summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--34313-8.txt6461
-rw-r--r--34313-8.zipbin0 -> 124954 bytes
-rw-r--r--34313-h.zipbin0 -> 167340 bytes
-rw-r--r--34313-h/34313-h.htm8683
-rw-r--r--34313-h/images/coverill.pngbin0 -> 727 bytes
-rw-r--r--34313-h/images/tp.pngbin0 -> 32714 bytes
-rw-r--r--34313.txt6461
-rw-r--r--34313.zipbin0 -> 124902 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
11 files changed, 21621 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/34313-8.txt b/34313-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c51ed10
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34313-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,6461 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Literature in the Making, by Various
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Literature in the Making
+ by some of its makers
+
+Author: Various
+
+Editor: Joyce Kilmer
+
+Release Date: November 13, 2010 [EBook #34313]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LITERATURE IN THE MAKING ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Elizaveta Shevyakhova, Suzanne Shell and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
+(This file was produced from images generously made
+available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ LITERATURE IN THE MAKING
+ BY
+ SOME OF ITS MAKERS
+
+ PRESENTED BY
+ JOYCE KILMER
+
+ [Illustration]
+
+ HARPER & BROTHERS
+ NEW YORK AND LONDON
+
+
+
+
+ Copyright, 1917, by Harper & Brothers
+ Printed in the United States of America
+ Published April, 1917
+
+
+
+
+ TO
+ LOUIS BEVIER, PH.D., LITT.D.
+ AND
+ LOUIS BEVIER, JR.
+
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+
+ PAGE
+
+_WAR STOPS LITERATURE_ 3
+
+ WILLIAM DEAN HOWELLS
+
+ William Dean Howells, the foremost American novelist of
+ his generation, was born at Martin's Ferry, Ohio, March
+ 11, 1837. Most of his many novels have been realistic
+ and sympathetic studies of contemporary American life.
+ For some years he has written "The Editor's Easy Chair"
+ in _Harper's Magazine_. He has received honorary
+ degrees from Harvard, Yale, Oxford, and Columbia, and
+ in 1915 the National Institute of Arts and Letters
+ awarded him its Gold Medal "For distinguished work in
+ fiction." _The Daughter of the Storage_ and _Years of
+ My Youth_ are his latest books.
+
+
+_THE JOYS OF THE POOR_ 19
+
+ KATHLEEN NORRIS
+
+ Kathleen Norris was born in San Francisco, California,
+ July 16, 1880. She is the wife of Charles Gilman
+ Norris, himself a writer and the brother of the late
+ Frank Norris. Among Mrs. Norris's best-known novels are
+ _Mother_, _The Story of Julia Page_, and _The Heart of
+ Rachel_.
+
+
+_NATIONAL PROSPERITY AND ART_ 35
+
+ BOOTH TARKINGTON
+
+ Booth Tarkington was born in Indianapolis, Indiana,
+ July 29, 1869. A prolific and brilliant writer, he has
+ scored many successes of different types, being the
+ author of the romantic drama _Monsieur Beaucaire_, and
+ of many novels dealing with contemporary Middle-Western
+ life. Recently he has, in _Seventeen_ and the "Penrod"
+ stories, given his attention to the comedies and
+ tragedies of American youth.
+
+
+_ROMANTICISM AND AMERICAN HUMOR_ 45
+
+ MONTAGUE GLASS
+
+ Montague Glass was born at Manchester, England, July
+ 23, 1877. Coming in his youth to the United States, he
+ brought into American fiction a new type--that of the
+ metropolitan Jewish-American business man. His _Potash
+ and Perlmutter_ and _Abe and Mawruss_ have given him a
+ European as well as an American reputation.
+
+
+_THE "MOVIES" BENEFIT LITERATURE_ 63
+
+ REX BEACH
+
+ Rex Beach was born at Atwood, Michigan, September 1,
+ 1877. His novels deal chiefly with the West and the
+ North, and his favorite theme is adventurous life in
+ the open. Among his best-known books are _The
+ Spoilers_, _The Silver Horde_, and _Rainbow's End_.
+
+
+_WHAT IS GENIUS?_ 75
+
+ ROBERT W. CHAMBERS
+
+ Robert W. Chambers was born in Brooklyn, New York, May
+ 26, 1865. One of the most widely read writers of his
+ time, he has given his attention chiefly to English and
+ American society, making it the theme of a large number
+ of novels, among which may be mentioned _The Fighting
+ Chance_, _Japonette_, and _Athalie_.
+
+
+_DETERIORATION OF THE SHORT STORY_ 89
+
+ JAMES LANE ALLEN
+
+ James Lane Allen was born near Lexington, Kentucky, in
+ 1849. In 1886 he gave up his profession of teaching to
+ devote his attention to literature. Many of his novels
+ deal with the South. Of them perhaps _The Kentucky
+ Cardinal_ and _The Choir Invisible_ are best known.
+
+
+_SOME HARMFUL INFLUENCES_ 101
+
+ HARRY LEON WILSON
+
+ Harry Leon Wilson was born in Oregon, Illinois, May 1,
+ 1867. He was co-author with Booth Tarkington of _The
+ Man from Home_, and his _Bunker Bean_ and _Ruggles of
+ Red Gap_ have given him a great reputation for
+ irresistible and peculiarly American humor.
+
+
+_THE PASSING OF THE SNOB_ 119
+
+ EDWARD S. MARTIN
+
+ Edward Sandford Martin was born in Willowbrook, Owasco,
+ New York, January 2, 1856. His keen yet sympathetic
+ observation of modern life finds expression in essays,
+ many of which have been used editorially in Life.
+ Several volumes of his essays have been published,
+ among which may be mentioned _The Luxury of Children,
+ and Some Other Luxuries_ and _Reflections of a
+ Beginning Husband_.
+
+
+_COMMERCIALIZING THE SEX INSTINCT_ 131
+
+ ROBERT HERRICK
+
+ Robert Herrick was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts,
+ April 26, 1868. He has been until recently a professor
+ at the University of Chicago. He is a critic and a
+ writer of realistic novels. _The Web of Life_, _The
+ Common Lot_, _Together_, and _Clark's Field_ are novels
+ that show Mr. Herrick's questioning attitude toward
+ some modern social institutions.
+
+
+_SIXTEEN DON'TS FOR POETS_ 145
+
+ ARTHUR GUITERMAN
+
+ Arthur Guiterman was born of American parents in
+ Vienna, Austria, November 28, 1871. He is a writer of
+ deft and humorous light verse, of which a volume was
+ recently published under the title _The Laughing Muse_.
+ He contributes a weekly rhymed review to _Life_.
+
+
+_MAGAZINES CHEAPEN FICTION_ 157
+
+ GEORGE BARR McCUTCHEON
+
+ George Barr McCutcheon was born on a farm in Tippecanoe
+ County, Indiana, July 26, 1866. He is a short-story
+ writer and novelist, devoting himself chiefly to tales
+ of adventure. _Beverley of Graustark_ and the volumes
+ that succeeded it have gained him many admirers among
+ lovers of romance.
+
+
+_BUSINESS INCOMPATIBLE WITH ART_ 169
+
+ FRANK H. SPEARMAN
+
+ Frank H. Spearman was born at Buffalo, New York,
+ September 6, 1859. He is known both as a short-story
+ writer and a writer of articles on economic topics. His
+ novels are founded chiefly on themes dealing with the
+ great industrial enterprises of the West, especially
+ the railroads. The best known of these are _The
+ Daughter of a Magnate_ and _The Strategy of Great
+ Railroads_.
+
+
+_THE NOVEL MUST GO_ 187
+
+ WILL N. HARBEN
+
+ Will N. Harben, who was born in Dalton, Georgia, July
+ 5, 1858, began his career in business in the South. His
+ entrance into literature began with the assistant
+ editorship of the _Youth's Companion_. He had gained a
+ distinctive place as an interpreter of phases of
+ Southern life in the company which includes Cable,
+ Harris, and Johnston. His novels include _Pole Baker_,
+ _Ann Boyd_, _Second Choice_, and many others.
+
+
+_LITERATURE IN THE COLLEGES_ 199
+
+ JOHN ERSKINE
+
+ John Erskine was born in New York City, October 5,
+ 1879. He is Adjunct Professor of English at Columbia
+ University, the author of many text-books and critical
+ works, of _Actæon and Other Poems_ and of _The Moral
+ Obligation to be Intelligent and Other Essays_.
+
+
+_CITY LIFE VERSUS LITERATURE_ 213
+
+ JOHN BURROUGHS
+
+ John Burroughs was born in Roxbury, New York, April 3,
+ 1837. He taught school in his early years, and held for
+ a time a clerkship in the United States Treasury. Since
+ 1874 he has devoted himself to literature and fruit
+ culture. Among his well-known "Nature" books may be
+ noted _Wake Robin_, _Bird and Bough_, and _Camping and
+ Tramping with Roosevelt_.
+
+
+_"EVASIVE IDEALISM" IN LITERATURE_ 229
+
+ ELLEN GLASGOW
+
+ Ellen Glasgow was born in Richmond, Virginia, April 22,
+ 1874. Her novels, among which may be mentioned _The
+ Voice of the People_, _The Romance of a Plain Man_, and
+ _Life and Gabriella_, deal chiefly with social and
+ psychological problems, and their scenes are for the
+ most part in the southern part of the United States.
+
+
+_"CHOCOLATE FUDGE" IN THE MAGAZINE_ 241
+
+ FANNIE HURST
+
+ Fannie Hurst was born in St. Louis, October 19, 1889.
+ She has served as a saleswoman and as a waitress and
+ crossed the Atlantic in the steerage to get material
+ for her short stories of the life of the working-woman,
+ selections of which have been published with the titles
+ _Just Around the Corner_ and _Every Soul Hath Its
+ Song_.
+
+
+_THE NEW SPIRIT IN POETRY_ 253
+
+ AMY LOWELL
+
+ Amy Lowell was born in Brookline, Massachusetts,
+ February 9, 1874. She is prominently identified with
+ _vers libre_, _imagisme_, and other ultra-modern poetic
+ tendencies. She has published a volume of essays on
+ modern French poetry and three books of poems, of
+ which _Men, Women, and Ghosts_ is the most recent.
+
+
+_A NEW DEFINITION OF POETRY_ 265
+
+ EDWIN ARLINGTON ROBINSON
+
+ Edwin Arlington Robinson was born in Head Tide, Maine,
+ December 22, 1869. He has written plays, but is chiefly
+ known for his poems, most of them studies of character.
+ His most recent volume is _Merlin: A Poem_.
+
+
+_LET POETRY BE FREE_ 277
+
+ JOSEPHINE PRESTON PEABODY
+
+ Josephine Preston Peabody was born in New York City.
+ She won the Stratford-on-Avon Prize for her poetic
+ drama _The Piper_. She has published many books of
+ verse, one of which, called _Harvest Moon_, deals
+ chiefly with woman's tragic share in the Great War. She
+ is the wife of Prof. Lionel Simeon Marks of Harvard.
+
+
+_THE HERESY OF SUPERMANISM_ 289
+
+ CHARLES RANN KENNEDY
+
+ Charles Rann Kennedy was born at Derby, England,
+ February 14, 1871. His plays, dealing with social and
+ religious questions, include _The Servant in the
+ House_, _The Terrible Meek_, _The Idol-Breakers_, and
+ _The Rib of the Man_, his latest work.
+
+
+_THE MASQUE AND DEMOCRACY_ 305
+
+ PERCY MACKAYE
+
+ Percy MacKaye was born in New York City, March 16,
+ 1875. He has written many poems and plays, and has been
+ especially identified with the production of community
+ pageants and masques, having written and directed the
+ St. Louis Civic Masque in 1914, and the Shakespeare
+ Masque in New York City in 1916. Among his published
+ works may be mentioned _The Scarecrow_, _Jeanne d'Arc_,
+ _Sappho and Phaon_ and _Anti-Matrimony_ (plays) and
+ _Uriel and Other Poems_.
+
+
+
+
+INTRODUCTION
+
+
+This book is an effort to bridge the gulf between literary theory and
+literary practice. In these days of specialization it is more than ever
+true that the man who lectures and writes about the craft of writing
+seldom has the time or the inclination to show, by actual work, that he
+can apply his principles. On the other hand, the successful novelist,
+poet, or playwright devotes himself to his craft and seldom attempts to
+analyze and display the methods by which he obtains his effect, or even
+to state his opinion on matters intellectual and æsthetic.
+
+Now, the professor of English and the literary critic are valuable
+members of society, and the development of literature owes much to their
+counsel and guardianship. But there is a special significance in the
+opinion which the writer holds concerning his own trade, in the advice
+which he bases upon his own experience, in the theory of life and art
+which he has formulated for himself.
+
+Therefore I have spent considerable time in talking with some of the
+most widely read authors of our day, and in obtaining from them frank
+and informal statements of their points of view. I have purposely
+refrained from confining myself to writers of any one school or type of
+mind--the dean of American letters and the most advanced of our newest
+poetical anarchists alike are represented in these pages. The authors
+have talked freely, realizing that this was an opportunity to set forth
+their views definitely and comprehensively. They have not the time to
+write or lecture about their art, but they are willing to talk about it.
+
+They knew that through me they spoke, in the first place, to the great
+army of readers of their books who have a natural and pleasing curiosity
+concerning the personality of the men and women who devote their lives
+to providing them with entertainment, and, in some cases, instruction.
+They knew that through me they spoke, in the second place, to all the
+literary apprentices of the country, who look eagerly for precept and
+example to those who have won fame by the delightful labor of writing.
+They knew that through me they spoke, in the third place, to critics and
+students of literature of our own generation and, perhaps, of those that
+shall come after us. How eagerly would we read, for instance, an
+interview with Francis Bacon on the question of the authorship of
+Shakespeare's plays, or an interview with Oliver Goldsmith in which he
+gave his real opinion of Dr. Johnson, Garrick, and Boswell! A century or
+so from now, some of the writers who in this book talk to the world may
+be the objects of curiosity as great.
+
+The writers who have talked with me received me with courtesy, gave me
+freely of their time and thought, and showed a sincere desire for the
+furtherance of the purpose of this book. To them, accordingly, I tender
+my gratitude for anything in these pages which the reader may find of
+interest or of value. Their explanations of their literary creeds and
+practices were furnished in the first instance for the _New York Times_,
+to which I desire to express my acknowledgments.
+
+ JOYCE KILMER.
+
+
+
+
+LITERATURE IN THE MAKING
+
+
+
+
+_WAR STOPS LITERATURE_
+
+WILLIAM DEAN HOWELLS
+
+
+War stops literature. This is the belief of a man who for more than a
+quarter of a century has been in the front rank of the world's
+novelists, who wrote _The Rise of Silas Lapham_ and _A Modern Instance_
+and nearly a hundred other sympathetic interpretations of American life.
+
+Mr. William Dean Howells was the third writer to whom was put the
+question, "What effect will the Great War have on literature?" And he
+was the first to give a direct answer.
+
+A famous French dramatist replied: "I am not a prophet. I have enough to
+do to understand the present and the past; I cannot concern myself with
+the future." A famous English short-story writer said, "The war has
+already inspired some splendid poetry; it may also inspire great plays
+and novels, but, of course, we cannot tell as yet."
+
+But Mr. Howells said, quite simply, "War stops literature." He said it
+as unemotionally as if he were stating a familiar axiom.
+
+He does not consider it an axiom, however, for he supplied proof.
+
+"I have never believed," he said, "that great events produced great
+literature. They seldom call forth the great creative powers of man. In
+poetry it is not the poems of occasion that endure, but the poems that
+have come into being independently, not as the result of momentous
+happenings.
+
+"This war does not furnish the poet, the novelist, and the dramatist
+with the material of literature. For instance, the Germans, as every one
+will admit, have shown extraordinary valor. But we do not think of
+celebrating that valor in poetry; it does not thrill the modern writers
+as such valor thrilled the writers of bygone centuries. When we think of
+the valor of the Germans, our emotion is not admiration but pity.
+
+"And the reason for this is that fighting is no longer our ideal.
+Fighting was not a great ideal, and therefore it is no longer our ideal.
+All that old material of literature--the clashing of swords, the thunder
+of shot and shell, the great clouds of smoke, the blood and fury--all
+this has gone out from literature. It is an anachronism."
+
+"But the American Civil War produced literature, did it not?" I asked.
+
+"What great literature did it produce?" asked Mr. Howells in turn. "As I
+look back over my life and recall to mind the great number of books that
+the Civil War inspired I find that I am thinking of things that the
+American people have forgotten. They did not become literature, these
+poems and stories that came in such quantities and seemed so important
+in the sixties.
+
+"There were the novels of J. W. De Forest, for instance. They were well
+written, they were interesting, they described some phases of the Civil
+War truthfully and vividly. We read them when they were written--but you
+probably have never heard of them. No one reads them now. They were
+literature, but that about which they were written has ceased to be of
+literary interest.
+
+"Of course, the Civil War, because of its peculiar nature, was followed
+by an expansion, intellectual as well as social and economic. And this
+expansion undoubtedly had its beneficial effect on literature. But the
+Civil War itself did not have, could not have, literary expression.
+
+"Of all the writings which the Civil War directly inspired I can think
+of only one that has endured to be called literature. That is Lowell's
+'Commemoration Ode.'
+
+"War stops literature. It is an upheaval of civilization, a return to
+barbarism; it means death to all the arts. Even the preparation for war
+stops literature. It stopped it in Germany years ago. A little anecdote
+is significant.
+
+"I was in Florence about 1883, long after the Franco-Prussian War, and
+there I met the editor of a great German literary weekly--I will not
+tell you its name or his. He was a man of refinement and education, and
+I have not forgotten his great kindness to my own fiction. One day I
+asked him about the German novelists of the day.
+
+"He said: 'There are no longer any German novelists worthy of the name.
+Our new ideal has stopped all that. Militarism is our new ideal--the
+ideal of Duty--and it has killed our imagination. So the German novel is
+dead.'"
+
+"Why is it, then," I asked, "that Russia, a nation of militaristic
+ideals, has produced so many great novels during the past century?"
+
+"Russia is not Germany," answered the man who taught Americans to read
+Turgenieff. "The people of Russia are not militaristic as the people of
+Germany are militaristic. In Germany war has for a generation been the
+chief idea of every one. The nation has had a militaristic obsession.
+And this, naturally, has stifled the imagination.
+
+"But in Russia nothing of the sort has happened. Whatever the designs of
+the ruling classes may be, the people of Russia keep their simplicity,
+their large intellectuality and spirituality. And, therefore, their
+imagination and other great intellectual and spiritual gifts find
+expression in their great novels and plays.
+
+"I well remember how the Russian novelists impressed me when I was a
+young man. They opened to me what seemed to be a new world--and it was
+only the real world. There is Tcheckoff--have you read his _Orchard_?
+What life, what color, what beauty of truth are in that book!
+
+"Then there is Turgenieff--how grateful I am for his books! It must be
+thirty years since I first read him. Thomas Sargent Perry, of Boston, a
+man of the greatest culture, was almost the first American to read
+Turgenieff. Stedman read Turgenieff in those days, too. Soon all of the
+younger writers were reading him.
+
+"I remember very well a dinner at Whitelaw Reid's house in Lexington
+Avenue, when some of us young men were enthusiastic over the Russian
+novel, and the author we mentioned most frequently was Turgenieff.
+
+"Dr. J. G. Holland, the poet who edited _The Century_, lived across the
+street from Mr. Reid, and during the evening he came over and joined us.
+He listened to us for a long time in silence, hardly speaking a word.
+When he rose to go, he said: 'I have been listening to the conversation
+of these young men for over an hour. They have been talking about books.
+And I have never before heard the names of any of the authors they have
+mentioned.'"
+
+"Were those the days," I asked, "in which you first read Tolstoy?"
+
+"That was long before the time," answered Mr. Howells. "Tolstoy
+afterward meant everything to me--his philosophy as well as his
+art--far more than Turgenieff. Tolstoy did not love all his writing.
+He loved the thing that he wrote about, the thing that he lived and
+taught--equality. And equality is the best thing in the world. It
+is the thing for which the Best of Men lived and died.
+
+"I never met Tolstoy," said Mr. Howells. "But I once sent him a message
+of appreciation after he had sent a message to me. Tolstoy was great in
+the way he wrote as well as in what he wrote. Tolstoy's force is a moral
+force. His great art is as simple as nature."
+
+"Do you think that the Russian novelists have influenced your work?" I
+asked.
+
+"I think," Mr. Howells replied, "that I had determined what I was to do
+before I read any Russian novels. I first thought that it was necessary
+to write only about things that I knew had already been written about.
+Certain things had already been in books; therefore, I thought, they
+legitimately were literary subjects and I might write about them.
+
+"But soon I knew that this idea was wrong, that I must get my material,
+not out of books, but out of life. And I also knew that it was not
+necessary for me to look at life through English spectacles. Most of our
+writers had been looking at life through English spectacles; they had
+been closely following in the footsteps of English novelists. I saw
+that around me were the materials for my work. I saw around me
+life--wholesome, natural, human.
+
+"I saw a young, free, energetic society. I saw a society in which
+love--the greatest and most beautiful thing in the world--was innocent;
+a society in which the relation between man and woman was simple and
+pure. Here, I thought, are the materials for novels. Why should I go
+back to the people of bygone ages and of lands not my own?"
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that romanticism has lost its hold on the
+novelists?"
+
+Mr. Howells smiled. "When realism," he said, "is once in a novelist's
+blood he never can degenerate into romanticism. Romanticism is no longer
+a literary force among English-speaking authors. Romanticism belongs to
+the days in which war was an aim, an ideal, instead of a tragic
+accident. It is something foreign to us. And literature must be native
+to the soil, affected, of course, by the culture of other lands and
+ages, but essentially of the people of the land and time in which it is
+produced. Realism is the material of democracy. And no great literature
+or art can arise outside of the democracy."
+
+Tolstoy was mentioned again, and Mr. Howells was asked if he did not
+think that the Russian novelist's custom of devoting a part of every day
+to work that was not literary showed that all writers would be better
+off if they were obliged to make a living in some other way than by
+writing. Mr. Howells gave his answer with considerable vigor. His calm,
+blue eyes lost something of their kindliness, and his lips were
+compressed into a straight, thin line before he said:
+
+"I certainly do not think so. The artist in letters or in lines should
+have leisure in which to perform his valuable service to society. The
+history of literature is full of heartbreaking instances of writers
+whose productive careers were retarded by their inability to earn a
+living at their chosen profession. The belief that poverty helps a
+writer is stupid and wrong. Necessity is not and never has been an
+incentive. Poverty is not and never has been an incentive. Writers and
+other creative artists are hindered, not helped, by lack of leisure.
+
+"I remember my own early experiences, and I know that my writing
+suffered very much because I could not devote all my time to it. I had
+to spend ten hours in drudgery for every two that I spent on my real
+work. The fact that authors who have given the world things that it
+treasures are forced to live in a state of anxiety over their finances
+is lamentable. This anxiety cannot but have a restrictive influence on
+literature. It is not want, but the fear of want, that kills."
+
+"Still, in spite of their precarious financial condition, modern authors
+are doing good work, are they not?" I asked.
+
+"Certainly they are," answered Mr. Howells, "the novelists especially.
+There is Robert Herrick, for example. His novels are interesting
+stories, and they also are faithful reflections of American life. Will
+Harben's work is admirable. It has splendid realism and fine humor.
+Perhaps one thing that has kept it, so far, from an appreciation so
+general as it will one day receive, is the fact that it deals, for the
+most part, with one special locality, a certain part of Georgia.
+
+"And in Spain--what excellent novelists they have there and have had for
+a long time! The realistic movement reached Spain long before it reached
+England and the United States. In fact, English-speaking countries were
+the last to accept it. I have taken great pleasure in the works of
+Armando Valdés. Then there are Pérez Galdós and Emilia Pardo Bazián, and
+that priest who wrote a realistic novel about Madrid society. All these
+novelists are realists, and realists of power.
+
+"Then there are the great Scandinavians. I hope that I may some time
+attempt to express a little of my gratitude for the pleasure that
+Björnson's works have given me."
+
+I asked, "What do you think of contemporary poetry?"
+
+"I admired chiefly that of Thomas Hardy," said Mr. Howells. "His poems
+have force and actuality and music and charm. Masefield I like, with
+reservations. Three modern poets who give me great pleasure are Thomas
+Hardy, William Watson, and Charles Hanson Towne. The first one of Mr.
+Towne's poems that I read was "Manhattan." I have not forgotten the
+truth of that poetic interpretation of New York. His poems are beautiful
+and they are full of humanity. In his latest book there is a poem called
+'A Ballad of Shame and Dread' that moved me deeply. It is a slight
+thing, but it is wonderfully powerful. Like all of Towne's poetry, it is
+warm with human sympathy."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that the great social problems of the day, the
+feminine unrest, for instance, are finding their expression in
+literature?"
+
+"No," said Mr. Howells, "I cannot call to mind any adequate literary
+expression of the woman movement. Perhaps this is because the women who
+know most about it and feel it most strongly are not writers. The best
+things that have been said about woman suffrage in our time have been
+said by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. She has written the noblest satire
+since Lowell. What wit she has, and what courage! Once I heard her
+address a meeting of Single-Taxers. Now, the Single-Taxers are all right
+so far as they go, but they don't go far enough. The Single-Taxers
+heckled her, but she had a retort ready for every interruption. She
+stood there with her brave smile and talked them all down."
+
+"Do you think that Ibsen expressed the modern feminine unrest in _The
+Doll's House_?" Mr. Howells was asked.
+
+"Ibsen seldom expressed things," was his reply. "He suggested them,
+mooted them, but he did not express them. _The Doll's House_ does not
+express the meaning of unrest, it suggests it. Ibsen told you where you
+stood, not where to go."
+
+Mr. Howells had recently presided at a meeting which was addressed by
+M. Brieux, and he expressed great admiration for the work of the French
+dramatist.
+
+"He is a great dramatist," he said. "He has given faithful reports of
+life, and faithful reports of life are necessarily criticisms of life.
+All great novels are criticisms of life. And I think that the poets will
+concern themselves more and more with the life around them. It is
+possible that soon we may have an epic in which the poet deals with the
+events of contemporary life."
+
+Mr. Howells is keenly awake to the effect which the war is having on
+conditions in New York. And in his sympathy for the society which
+inevitably must suffer for a war in which it is not directly concerned,
+the active interest of the novelist was evident. "If all this only could
+be reflected in a book!" he said. "If some novelist could interpret
+it!"
+
+
+
+
+_THE JOYS OF THE POOR_
+
+KATHLEEN NORRIS
+
+
+Any young woman who desires to become a famous novelist and short-story
+writer like Kathleen Norris will do well to take the following steps: In
+the first place, come to New York. In the second place, marry some one
+like Charles Gilman Norris.
+
+Of course, every one who read _Mother_ and _The Rich Mrs. Burgoyne_ and
+_Saturday's Child_ knew that the author was a married woman--and also a
+married woman with plenty of personal experience with babies and stoves
+and servants and other important domestic items. But not until I visited
+Kathleen Norris at her very genuine home in Port Washington did I
+appreciate the part which that domestic item called a husband has played
+in Kathleen Norris's communications to the world.
+
+I made this discovery after Charles Gilman Norris--accompanied by
+little Frank, who bears the name of the illustrious novelist who was his
+uncle--had motored me through Port Washington's pleasant avenues to the
+Norris house. Before a fire of crackling hickory logs, Kathleen Norris
+(clad in something very charming, which I will not attempt to describe)
+was talking about the qualities necessary to a writer's success. And one
+of these, she said, was a business sense.
+
+Now, Mrs. Norris did not look exactly business-like. Nor is "a business
+sense" the quality which most readers would immediately hit upon as the
+characteristic which made the author of _Gayley the Troubadour_
+different from the writers of other stories. I ventured to suggest this
+to Mrs. Norris.
+
+"I don't claim to possess a business sense," she said. "But my husband
+has a business sense. He has taken charge of selling my stories to the
+magazines and dealing with publishers and all of that. I do think that
+literally thousands of writers are hindered from ever reaching the
+public by the lack of business sense. And I know that my husband has
+been responsible for getting most of my work published. My stories have
+appeared since my marriage, you know. I don't need to have a business
+sense, all I have to do is to write the stories. My husband does all
+the rest--I don't need even to have any of the author's complacency, or
+the author's pride!"
+
+Mrs. Norris's fame is only about five years old--about as old as her
+son. I asked her about her life before she was known as a writer,
+expecting to hear picturesque tales of literary tribulations among the
+hills of California. But her description of her journey to success was
+not the conventional one; her journey was not for years paved with
+rejection slips and illumined with midnight oil.
+
+"It was New York that did it," she said. "When we first came to New York
+from California the editor of a magazine with which Mr. Norris was
+connected gave us a tea. Most of the people who were present were
+short-story writers and novelists. It was pleasant for me to meet them,
+and I enjoyed the afternoon. But my chief sensation was one of shock--it
+was a real shock to me to find that writers were people!
+
+"I felt as if I had met Joan of Arc, Cæsar, Cleopatra, Alexander the
+Great, and all the great figures of history, and found them to be human
+beings like myself. 'These writers are not supermen and superwomen,' I
+said to myself, 'they are human beings like me. Why can't I do what
+they're doing?'
+
+"I thought this over after we went home that evening. And I made a
+resolve. I resolved that before the next tea that I attended I would
+tell a story. And when I next went to a tea I had sold a story."
+
+"To what publication had you sold it?" I asked.
+
+"To an evening paper," said Mrs. Norris; "but I had written and sold a
+story. That was something; it meant a great deal to me. My first stories
+were all sold to this evening paper, for twelve dollars each. This paper
+printed a story every day, paying twelve dollars for each of them, and
+giving a prize of fifty dollars for the best story published each week.
+I won one of the fifty-dollar prizes."
+
+Any one who to-day could buy a Kathleen Norris story for fifty dollars
+would be not an editor, but a magician. Yet the memory of that early
+triumph seemed to give Mrs. Norris real pleasure.
+
+"I wrote _What Happened to Alanna_ two years before the Fire," she said.
+("The Fire" means only one thing when a Californian says it.) "But most
+of my stories have been written since I came to New York."
+
+I asked Mrs. Norris for the history of one of her earliest stories, a
+story of California life which appeared in the _Atlantic Monthly_. She
+said: "That story went to twenty-six magazines before it was printed. My
+husband had an alphabetical list of magazines. He sent the story first
+to the _Atlantic Monthly_ and then to twenty-five other magazines. They
+all returned it. Then he started at the top of the list again, and this
+time the _Atlantic Monthly_ accepted it."
+
+The mention of Mr. Norris's activities in selling this story brought our
+conversation back to the subject of the "business sense."
+
+"A writer needs the ability to sell a story as well as the ability to
+write it," said Mrs. Norris, "unless there is some one else to do the
+writing. Many a woman writes a really good story, sends it hopefully to
+an editor, gets it back with a printed notice of its rejection, and puts
+it away in a desk drawer. Then years later she tells her grandchildren
+that she once wanted to be an author, but found that she couldn't do it.
+
+"Now, that is no way for a writer to gain success. The writer must be
+persevering, not only in writing, but in trying to get his work before
+the public. Unless, as I said, there is some one else to supply the
+perseverance in getting the work before the public.
+
+"I think that the desire to write generally indicates the possession of
+the power to write. But young writers are too easily discouraged. But I
+have no right to blame a writer for being discouraged. I had frightful
+discouragement--until I was married."
+
+It is easy to see that Kathleen Norris does not hesitate to find in her
+own home life material for her industrious pen. Little Frank has
+undoubtedly served his mother as a model many times--which is not meant
+to indicate that he is that monstrosity, a model child. Indeed, Mrs.
+Norris believes that a novelist should use the material which lies ready
+at hand, instead of seeking for exotic and unusual topics. She sees that
+people want to read about the things with which they are already
+familiar, that they are not (as many young writers seem to think) eager
+for novelties.
+
+"I cannot understand," she said, "how it is that writers will clamor for
+recognition, and abuse the public for not welcoming them with
+enthusiasm, and yet will not give the public what they know that the
+public wants. So many people seem to want just their own sort of art,
+but to want money, too. Now, I wouldn't write for a million dollars some
+of those things that are called 'best sellers.' But I cannot see why a
+writer who is avowedly writing for the public should think it beneath
+him to treat the themes in which the public is interested. The greatest
+tragedy of literature is the writer who persists in trying to give the
+public what it does not want. Think of poor Gissing, for instance, dying
+embittered because he couldn't sell his work!"
+
+Mrs. Norris's conviction that a writer should use the material around
+him is so strong that she seems actually to be pained by the thought of
+all the excellent things for stories that are going to waste. I asked
+her if literature ever could come from apartment-houses. She said:
+
+"Of course it can! There is no reason why there shouldn't be good
+stories and novels of apartment-house life. One reason why we are not
+writing more and better stories of the life around us is because we are
+living that life so intensely--too intensely. We live in this country so
+close to our income that the problem of earning money makes us lose
+sight of the essentials of life. It would be a fine thing for us,
+mentally and spiritually, if we should live on less than we do. If, for
+example, a family that found it was in receipt of a few hundred dollars
+more a year than before should decide, therefore, to live under a
+simpler scale than before, to do away with some really worthless
+luxuries, what a fine thing that would be!"
+
+Of course many young writers come to Mrs. Norris for advice. And some of
+them excellently illustrate the tendency which she deprecates, the
+tendency to write about the unknown instead of the familiar.
+
+"I was talking the other day to a young girl of my acquaintance who is a
+costume model," she said. "She has literary aspirations. Now, her life
+itself has been an interesting story--her rise from a shopgirl to her
+present position. And every now and then she will say something to me
+that is a most interesting revelation--something that indicates the rich
+store of experience that she might, if she would, draw upon in her
+stories. On one occasion she said to me, 'I went home and put my
+shoe-drawer in order.'
+
+"'What do you mean?' I asked. 'What is your shoe-drawer?'
+
+"'Why, my shoe-drawer!' she answered. 'You see, we costume models have
+to have a drawer full of shoes, because we must change our shoes to
+match every costume.'
+
+"Why is it," asked Mrs. Norris, "that a girl like that cannot see the
+value of such an incident as that? That shoe-drawer is a picturesque and
+interesting thing, unknown to most people. And this girl, who knows all
+about it, and wants to write, cannot see its literary value! And yet
+what more interesting subject is there for her to write about than that
+shoe-drawer? I do not see why writers will not appreciate the importance
+of writing about the things that are around them."
+
+Mrs. Norris gave a somewhat embarrassed laugh. "I really shouldn't
+attempt to lay down the law in this way," she said. "I can speak only
+for myself--I must write of the people and things that I know best, but
+I ought not to attempt to prescribe what other people shall write
+about."
+
+Mrs. Norris's chief literary enthusiasm seems to be Charles Dickens.
+"When we were all infants out in the backwoods of California," she said,
+"we battened on Dickens. Dickens and a writer whom I don't suppose
+anybody reads nowadays--Henry Kingsley. The boys read Sir Walter
+Scott's novels, and left Dickens to me. I read Dickens with delight, and
+I still read him with delight. I have found passages in Dickens of which
+I honestly believe there are no equal in all English literature except
+in Shakespeare. I do not think that there is ever a year in which I do
+not read some of Dickens's novels over again. Of course, any one can
+find Dickens's faults--but I do not see how any one can fail to find his
+excellences."
+
+"What is it in Dickens that especially attracts you?" I asked.
+
+Mrs. Norris was silent for a moment. Then she said: "I think I like him
+chiefly because he saw so clearly the joys of the poor. He did not give
+his poor people nothing but disease and oppression and despair. He gave
+them roast goose and plum pudding for their Christmas dinner--he gave
+them faith and hope and love. He knew that often the rich suffer and the
+poor are happy.
+
+"Many of the modern realists seem ignorant of the fact that the poor may
+be happy. They think that the cotter's Saturday night must always be
+squalid and sordid and dismal, and that the millionaire's Saturday night
+must be splendid and joyful. As a matter of fact, the poor family may
+be, and often is, healthier and happier in every way than the rich
+family. But these extreme realists are not like Dickens, they have not
+his intimate knowledge of the life of the poor. They have the outsider's
+viewpoint.
+
+"Too many writers are telling us about the sorrows of the poor. We need
+writers who will tell us about the joys of the poor. We need writers who
+will be aware of the pleasures to be derived from a good dinner of
+corned beef and cabbage and a visit to a moving-picture theater. Often
+when I pass a row of mean houses, as they would be called, I think
+gratefully of the good times that I have had in just such places."
+
+The thought of that little Celtic Californian reading Dickens among the
+redwood-trees appealed to me. So I asked Mrs. Norris to tell more about
+her childhood.
+
+"Well," she said, "we hear a great deal about the misery, the bleak and
+barren lives of the children who live in the tenements of New York's
+lower East Side. But I think that an East Side tenement child would die
+of ennui if it should be brought up as we were brought up. We had none
+of the amusing and exciting experiences of the East Side child--we had
+no white stockings, no ice-cream cones, no Coney Island, nothing of the
+sort.
+
+"We never even went to school. We would study French for a while with
+some French neighbor who had sufficient leisure to teach us, and then
+we'd study Spanish for a while with some Spaniard. That was the extent
+of our schooling.
+
+"My parents died when I was eighteen years old. I went to the city and
+tried my hand at different sorts of work. For one thing, I tried to get
+up children's parties, but in eighteen months I managed only one. Then I
+did settlement work, was a librarian, a companion, and society reporter
+on a newspaper. Then I got married--and wrote stories."
+
+Mrs. Norris was at one time opposed to woman suffrage. Now, however, she
+is a suffragist, but she refuses to say that she has been "converted" to
+suffragism.
+
+"I can't say that I have been converted to suffragism," she said, "any
+more than I can say that I have been converted to warm baths and
+tooth-brushes. And it does not seem to me that any women should need to
+defend her right to vote any more than she should need to defend her
+right to love her children. There is a theme for a novel--a big
+suffrage novel will be written one of these days."
+
+It may be that the author of _Mother_ will be the author of this "big
+suffrage novel." But at present she disclaims any such intention. But
+she admits that there is a purpose in all her portrayals of normal,
+wholesome American home life.
+
+"I don't think that I believe in 'art for art's sake,' as it is
+generally interpreted," she said. "Of course, I don't believe in what is
+called the commercial point of view--I have never written anything just
+to have it printed. But I do not believe that there is any one standard
+of art. I think that any book which the people ought to read must have
+back of it something besides the mere desire of the writer to create
+something. I never could write without a moral intention."
+
+
+
+
+_NATIONAL PROSPERITY AND ART_
+
+BOOTH TARKINGTON
+
+
+Mr. Booth Tarkington never will be called the George M. Cohan of
+fiction. His novel, _The Turmoil_, is surely an indictment of modern
+American urban civilization; of its materialism, its braggadocio, its
+contempt for the things of the soul.
+
+It was with the purpose of making this indictment a little clearer than
+it could be when it is surrounded by a story, that I asked Mr.
+Tarkington a few questions. And his answers are not likely to increase
+our national complacencies.
+
+In the first place, I asked Mr. Tarkington if the atmosphere of a young
+and energetic nation might not reasonably be expected to be favorable to
+literary and artistic expression.
+
+"Yes, it might," said Mr. Tarkington. "There may be spiritual progress
+in America as phenomenal as her material progress.
+
+"There is and has been extraordinary progress in the arts. But the
+people as a whole are naturally preoccupied with their material
+progress. They are much more interested in Mr. Rockefeller than in Mr.
+Sargent."
+
+The last two sentences of Mr. Tarkington's reply made me eager for
+something a little more specific on that subject.
+
+"What are the forces in America to-day," I asked, "that hinder the
+development of art and letters?"
+
+Mr. Tarkington replied: "There are no forces in America to-day that
+hinder the development of individuals in art and letters, save in
+unimportant cases here and there. But there is a spirit that hinders
+general personal decency, knows and cares nothing for beauty, and is
+glad to have its body dirty for the sake of what it calls 'prosperity.'
+
+"It 'wouldn't give a nickel' for any kind of art. But it can't and
+doesn't hinder artists from producing works of art, though it makes them
+swear."
+
+"But do not these conditions in many instances seriously hinder
+individual artists?"
+
+Mr. Tarkington smiled. "Nothing stops an artist if he is one," he said.
+"But many things may prevent a people or a community from knowing or
+caring for art.
+
+"The climate may be unfavorable; we need not expect the Eskimos to be
+interested in architecture. In the United States politicians have
+usually controlled the public purchase of works of art and the erection
+of public buildings. This is bad for the public, naturally."
+
+"I suppose," I said, "that the conditions you describe are distinctively
+modern, are they not? At what time in the history of America have
+conditions been most favorable to literary expression?"
+
+Mr. Tarkington's reply was not what I expected. "At all times," he said.
+"Literary expression does not depend on the times, though the
+appreciation of it does, somewhat."
+
+I asked Mr. Tarkington if he agreed with Mr. Gouverneur Morris in
+considering the short story a modern development. He did not.
+
+"There are short stories in the Bible," he said, "and in every
+mythology; 'folk stories' of all races and tribes. Probably Mr. Morris's
+definition of the short story would exclude these. I agree with him that
+short stories are better written nowadays."
+
+"But you do not believe," I said, "that American literature in general
+is better than it used to be, do you? Why is it that there is now no
+group of American writers like the New England group which included
+Longfellow, Whittier, Lowell, Emerson, and Thoreau?"
+
+"Why is there," Mr. Tarkington asked in turn, "no group like Homer
+(wasn't he a group?) in Greece? There may be, but if there is just such
+a modern group it would tend only to repeat the work of the Homeric
+group, which wouldn't be interesting to the rest of us.
+
+"The important thing is to find a group unlike Longfellow, Whittier,
+Lowell, Emerson, and Thoreau. That is, if one accepts the idea that it
+is important to find a group."
+
+Mr. Tarkington's criticisms of the modern American city have been so
+severe that I expected him to tell me that all writers should live in
+the country. But again he surprised me. In reply to my question as to
+which environment was more favorable to the production of literature,
+the city or the country, he said:
+
+"It depends upon the nerves of the writer. A writer can be born
+anywhere, and he can grow up anywhere."
+
+There has recently been considerable discussion--Professor Edward
+Garnet and Gertrude Atherton have taken a considerable share in it--on
+the relative merits of contemporary English and American fiction. I
+asked Mr. Tarkington if in his opinion the United States had at the
+present time novelists equal to those of England.
+
+"That is unanswerable!" he answered. "Writers aren't like baseball
+teams. What's the value of my opinion that _The Undiscovered Country_ is
+a 'greater' novel than _A Pair of Blue Eyes_? These questions remind me
+of school debating societies. Nothing is demonstrated, but everybody has
+his own verdict."
+
+Until I asked Mr. Tarkington about it I had heard only two opinions as
+to the probable effect on literature of the war. One was that which
+William Dean Howells tersely expressed by saying: "War stops
+literature," and the other was that the war is purifying and
+strengthening all forms of literary expression.
+
+But Mr. Tarkington had something new to say about it. "What effect," I
+asked, "is the war likely to have on American literature?"
+
+"None of consequence," he answered. "The poet will find the subject, war
+or no war. The sculptor doesn't depend upon epaulets."
+
+Mr. Tarkington is so inveterate a writer of serials, and his work is so
+familiar to the readers of the American magazines, that I desired to get
+his expert opinion as to whether or not the American magazines, with
+their remarkably high prices, had harmed or benefited fiction. His reply
+was somewhat non-committal.
+
+"They have induced many people to look upon the production of fiction as
+a profitable business," he said. "But those people would merely not have
+'tried fiction' at all otherwise. Prices have nothing to do with art."
+
+Mr. Tarkington had some interesting things to say about that venerable
+mirage, the Great American Novel. I asked him if that longed-for work
+would ever be written; if, for example, there would ever be a work of
+fiction reflecting American life as _Vanity Fair_ reflects English life.
+He replied:
+
+"If Thackeray had been an American he would not have written a novel
+reflecting American life as _Vanity Fair_ reflected the English life of
+its time. He would have written of New York; his young men would have
+come there after Harvard. The only safe thing to say of the Great
+American Novel is that the author will never know he wrote it."
+
+Mr. Charles Belmont Davis had told me that a writer who had some means
+of making a living other than writing would do better work than one who
+devoted himself exclusively to literature. I asked Mr. Tarkington what
+he thought about this.
+
+"I think," he said, "that it would be very well for a writer to have
+some means of making a living other than writing. There are likely to be
+times in his career when it would give him a sense of security
+concerning food. But I doubt if it would much affect his writing, unless
+he considered writing to be a business."
+
+Mr. Tarkington's answer to my next question is hereby commended to the
+attention of all those feminine revolutionists who believe that they are
+engaged in the pleasant task of changing the whole current of modern
+thought.
+
+"How has literature been affected," I asked, "by the suffrage movement
+and feminism?"
+
+Mr. Tarkington looked up in some surprise. "I haven't heard of any
+change," he said.
+
+The author of _The Turmoil_ could never be accused of jingoism. But he
+is far from agreeing with those critics who believe that American
+literature is merely "a phase of English literature." I asked him if he
+believed that there was such a thing as a distinctively American
+literature.
+
+"Certainly," he replied. "Is _Huckleberry Finn_ a phase? It's a
+monument; not an English one. English happens to be the language largely
+used."
+
+The allusion in Mr. Tarkington's last reply suggested--what every reader
+of _Penrod_ must know--that this novelist is an enthusiastic admirer of
+Mark Twain. So I told him that Mr. T. A. Daly had classed Mark Twain
+with Artemus Ward and Q. K. Philander Doesticks, P.B., and had said that
+these men wrote nothing of real merit and were "the Charlie Chaplins of
+their time."
+
+Mr. Tarkington smiled. "Get Mr. T. A. Daly to talk some more," he said.
+"We'd like to hear something about Voltaire and Flo Ziegfeld. Second
+thoughts indicate that 'T. A. Daly' is the pen name of Mr. Charlie
+Chaplin. Of course! And that makes it all right and natural. I thought
+at first that it was a joke."
+
+
+
+
+_ROMANTICISM AND AMERICAN HUMOR_
+
+MONTAGUE GLASS
+
+
+Once upon a time William Dean Howells leveled the keen lance of his
+satire against what he called "the monstrous rag baby of romanticism."
+In those simple days, literary labels were easily applied. A man who
+wrote about Rome, Italy, was a romanticist; a man who wrote about Rome,
+New York, was a Realist.
+
+Now, however, a writer who finds his themes in the wholesale business
+district of New York City does not disavow the title formerly given
+exclusively to makers of drawn-sword-and-prancing-steed fiction.
+Montague Glass is a romanticist.
+
+The laureate of the cloak-and-suit trade and biographer of Mr. Abe
+Potash and Mr. Mawruss Perlmutter does not believe that romance is a
+matter of time and place. A realistic novel, he believes, may be written
+about the Young Pretender or Alexander the Great, and a romance
+about--well, about Elkan Lubliner, American.
+
+Of course, I asked him to defend his claim to the name of romanticist.
+He did so, but in general terms, without special reference to his own
+work. For this widely read author has the amazing virtue of modesty.
+
+"I do not think," he said, "that the so-called historical novelists are
+the only romanticists. The difference between the two schools of writers
+is in method, rather than in subject.
+
+"A romanticist is a writer who creates an atmosphere of his own about
+the things with which he deals. He is the poet, the constructive artist.
+He calls into being that which has not hitherto existed.
+
+"A realist, however, is a writer who faithfully reproduces an atmosphere
+that already exists. He reports, records; one of his distinguishing
+characteristics must be his attention to detail. The romanticist is as
+truthful as the realist, but he deals with a few large truths rather
+than with many small facts."
+
+"And you," I said, determined to make the conversation more personal,
+"prefer the romantic method?"
+
+"Yes," said Mr. Glass, "I do. I prefer to use the romantic method, and
+to read the works of the writers who use it. I believe that there is
+more value in suggestion than in detailed description. For instance, I
+do not think that my stories would gain vividness if I should put all
+the dialogue--I tell my stories chiefly by means of dialogues, you
+know--into dialect. So I do not put down the dialogue phonetically. I
+spell the words correctly, not in accordance with the pronunciation of
+my characters.
+
+"This is not an invariable rule. When, for instance, Abe or Mawruss has
+learned a new long word which he uses frequently to show it off, he
+generally mispronounces it. He may say 'quincidence' for 'coincidence.'
+Such a mispronunciation as this I reproduce, for it has its significance
+as a revelation of character. But I do not attempt to put down all
+mispronunciations; I let the dialect be imagined.
+
+"The romanticist, you see, uses his own imagination and expects
+imagination in his readers. His method might be called impressionistic;
+he outlines and suggests, instead of describing exhaustively. The
+romanticist really is more economical than the realist, and he has more
+restraint."
+
+"Who are the leading romanticists of the day?" I asked.
+
+"Well," Mr. Glass replied, "my favorite among contemporary romanticists
+is Joseph Conrad. There is a man who is certainly no swashbuckling
+novelist of the Wardour Street school. He writes of modern life, and yet
+he is a romanticist through and through.
+
+"I think that I may justly claim to be one of the first admirers of
+Conrad in America. I used to read him when apparently the only other man
+in this part of the world to appreciate him was William L. Alden, who
+praised him in the columns of the _New York Times Review of Books_.
+
+"I well remember my discovery of Conrad. I went to Brooklyn to hear
+'Tosca' sung at the Academy of Music. I had bought my ticket, and I had
+about an hour to spend before it would be time for the curtain to rise.
+So I went across the street to the Brooklyn Public Library.
+
+"While I was idly looking over the novels on the shelves I came upon
+Conrad's _Typhoon_. I sat down and began to read it.
+
+"When I arose, I had finished the book. Also, I had missed the first two
+acts of the opera--and I had been eager to hear them. But Conrad more
+than compensated for the loss of those two acts.
+
+"Many of the modern English writers are romanticists. Galsworthy surely
+is no realist. And William de Morgan, although he writes at great length
+and has abundance of detail, is a romanticist. He does not use detail
+for its own sake, as the realists use it; he uses it only when it has
+some definite value in unfolding the plot or revealing character. He
+uses it significantly; he is particularly successful in using it
+humorously, as Daudet and Dickens used it. Arnold Bennett is a realist,
+and I think that one of the reasons why he is so widely read in the
+United States is because the life which he describes so minutely is a
+life much like that of his American readers. People like to read about
+the sort of life they already know. The average reader wants to have a
+sense of familiarity with the characters in his novels."
+
+Mr. Glass is a contrary person. It is contrary for the only novelist who
+knows anything about New York's cloak-and-suit trade to be of English
+birth and to look like a poet. It is contrary of him to have that
+distinctively American play, "Potash and Perlmutter," start its London
+run two years ago and be "still going strong." And it was contrary of
+him not to say, as he might reasonably be expected to say in view of his
+own success, that the encounters and adventures of business must be the
+theme of the American novelists of the future.
+
+"No," he said, in answer to my question, "I do not see any reason for
+the novelist to confine himself to business life. Themes for fiction are
+universal. A novelist should write of the life he knows best, whatever
+it may be.
+
+"I do not mean that the novelist should write about his own business. I
+mean that he should write about the psychology that he understands. A
+man who spends years in the cloak-and-suit business is not, therefore,
+qualified to write novels about that business, even if he is qualified
+to write novels at all.
+
+"I had no real knowledge of the cloak-and-suit trade when I began to
+write about it. I made many technical blunders. For instance, I had
+Potash and Perlmutter buying goods by the gross instead of by the piece.
+And I received many indignant letters pointing out my mistake.
+
+"I had never been in the cloak-and-suit trade. But my work as a lawyer
+had brought me into contact with many people who were in that business,
+and I had intimate knowledge of the psychology of the Jew, his religion,
+his humor, his tragedy, his whole attitude toward life.
+
+"The trouble with many young writers," said Mr. Glass, "is that they
+don't know what they are writing about. They are attempting to describe
+psychological states of which they have only third-hand knowledge. Their
+ideas have no semblance of truth, and therefore their work is absolutely
+unconvincing."
+
+"At any rate," I said, "you will admit that American writers are more
+and more inclined to make the United States the scene of their stories.
+Do you think that O. Henry's influence is responsible for this?"
+
+"No," said Mr. Glass, "I do not think that this is due to O. Henry's
+influence. It was a natural development. You see, O. Henry's literary
+life lasted for only about four years, and while he has had many
+imitators, I do not think that he can be given credit for directing the
+attention of American writers to the life of their own country.
+
+"Probably William Dean Howells should be called the founder of the
+modern school of American fiction. He was the first writer to achieve
+distinguished success for tales of modern American life. There were
+several other authors who began to write about Americans soon after Mr.
+Howells began--Thomas Janvier, H. C. Bunner, and Brander Matthews were
+among them.
+
+"Kipling's popularity gave a great impetus to the writing of short
+stories of modern life. It is interesting to trace the course of the
+short story from Kipling to O. Henry.
+
+"Did you ever notice," asked Mr. Glass, "that the best stories on New
+York life are written by people who have been born and brought up
+outside of the city? The writer who has always lived in New York seems
+thereby to be disqualified from writing about it, just as the man in the
+cloak-and-suit trade is too close to his subject to reproduce it in
+fiction. The writer who comes to New York after spending his youth
+elsewhere gets the full romantic effect of New York; he gets a
+perspective on it which the native New-Yorker seldom attains. The
+viewpoint of the writer who has always lived in New York is subjective,
+whereas one must have the objective viewpoint to write about the city
+successfully.
+
+"I have been surprised by the caricatures of American life which come
+from the pen of writers American by birth and ancestry. Recently I read
+a novel by an American who has--and deserves, for he is a writer of
+talent and reputation--a large following. This was a story of life in a
+manufacturing town with which the novelist is thoroughly familiar. It,
+however, appears to have been written to satisfy a grudge and
+consequently one could mistake it for the work of an Englishman who had
+once made a brief tour of America. For the big manufacturer who was the
+principal character in the story was vulgar enough to satisfy the
+prejudice of any reader of the _London Daily Mail_. Certainly the
+descriptions of the gaudy and offensive furniture in the rich
+manufacturer's house and the dialogue of the members of his family and
+the servants could provide splendid ammunition for the _Saturday Review_
+or _The Academy_. The book appears to be a caricature, and yet that
+novelist had lived most of his life among the sort of people about whom
+he was writing!
+
+"And how absolutely ignorant most New-Yorkers are of New York. Irvin
+Cobb comes here from Louisville, Kentucky, and gets an intimate
+knowledge of the city, and puts that knowledge into his short stories.
+But a man brought up here makes the most ridiculous mistakes when he
+writes about New York.
+
+"I read a story of New York life recently that absolutely disgusted me,
+its author was so ignorant of his subject. Yet he was a born New-Yorker.
+Let me tell you what he wrote. He said that a man went into an arm-chair
+lunch-room and bought a meal. His check amounted to sixty-five cents!
+Now any one who knows anything about arm-chair lunch-rooms beyond the
+mere fact of their existence knows that the cashier of such an
+institution would drop dead if a customer paid him sixty-five cents at
+one time. Then, the hero of this story had as a part of his meal in this
+arm-chair lunch-room a baked potato, for which he paid fifteen cents!
+Imagine a baked potato in such a place, and a fifteen-cent baked potato
+at that!"
+
+Mr. Glass did not, like most successful humorists, begin as a writer of
+tragedy. His first story to be printed was "Aloysius of the Docks," a
+humorous story of an East Side Irish boy, which appeared in 1900. The
+lower East Side was for many years the scene of most of his stories. But
+he does resemble most other writers in this respect, that he wrote
+verse before he wrote fiction. I asked him to show me some of his
+poetry, and he demurred somewhat violently. But, after all, a poet is a
+poet, and at last I succeeded in persuading him to produce this exhibit.
+Here it is--a poem by the author of "Potash and Perlmutter":
+
+ FERRYBOATS
+
+ There sounds aloft a warning scream,
+ The jingling bell gives tongue below,
+ She breasts again the busy stream,
+ And cleaves its murky tide to snow.
+ Bereft of burnished glittering brass,
+ Ungainly bulging fore and aft,
+ Slowly from shore to shore they pass--
+ The matrons of the river craft.
+
+Mr. Glass believes that humorous writing in America has changed more
+than any other sort. But he does not, as I thought he would, attribute
+this change to the increased cosmopolitanism of the country, to the
+influx of people from other lands.
+
+"Certainly our ideas of what is funny have changed," he said. "Humor is
+an ephemeral thing. A generation ago we laughed at what to-day would
+merely make us ill. The subjects and the methods of the humorists are
+different. Who nowadays can find a laugh in the pages of Artemus Ward,
+Philander Q. Doesticks, or Petroleum V. Nasby? Yet in their time these
+men set the whole continent in a roar.
+
+"Contrast two humorists typical of their respective periods--Bill Nye
+and Abe Martin. I remember many years ago reading a story by Bill Nye
+which every one then considered tremendously funny. He told how he went
+downtown and got a shave and put on a clean collar and as he said,
+'otherwise disguised himself.' When he got home his little dog refused
+to recognize him, and several pages were devoted to his efforts to
+persuade the dog of his identity. Then, failing to convince the dog that
+he was really the same Bill Nye in spite of his shave and clean collar,
+he impaled it on a pitchfork and buried it, putting over it the epitaph,
+'Not dead, but jerked hence by request.'
+
+"Now contrast with that a good example of modern American humor--a joke
+by Abe Martin which I recently saw. There was a picture of two or three
+men looking at a tattered tramp, and one of them was represented as
+saying: 'You wouldn't think to look at him that that man played an
+elegant game of billiards ten years ago!'
+
+"It is an entirely different form of humor, you see. Bill Nye and the
+writers of his school got their effects by grotesque misspelling,
+fantastic ideas, and by the liberal use of shock and surprise. The
+modern humor is subtler, more delicate, and more likely to endure.
+
+"I do not think that the fact that America has become more cosmopolitan
+has anything to do with this altered sense of humor. The American
+humorists do not select cosmopolitan themes; the best of them are
+distinctively American in their subject. Irvin Cobb, George Fitch, Kate
+Douglas Wiggin, Edna Ferber Stewart, who wrote _The Fugitive
+Blacksmith_--all these people draw their inspiration from purely
+American phases of the life around them."
+
+"What is it, then," I asked, "that has changed American humor?"
+
+"Leisure," answered Mr. Glass. "Philander Q. Doesticks and other
+humorists of his time wrote to amuse pioneers, people rough and
+elemental in their tastes. Their audience consisted of men who worked
+hard most of the time, and therefore had to be hit hard by any joke that
+was to entertain them at all. But as Americans grew more leisurely, and
+therefore had time to read, see plays, and look at pictures, they lost
+their taste for crude and violent horseplay, and the new sort of humor
+came in. Undoubtedly the same thing occurs in every newly settled
+country--Australia, for example. It is unlikely that the Australian of
+one hundred years from now will be amused by the things that amuse
+Australians to-day.
+
+"But the humor that entertains the citizens of a country of which the
+civilization is well established is likely to retain its charm through
+the years. Mark Twain's stories do not lose their flavor. But Mark Twain
+was not exclusively a humorist; he was a student of life and he
+reflected the tragedy of existence as well as its comedy. So does Irvin
+Cobb, who is the nearest approach to Mark Twain now living.
+
+"One source of Mark Twain's strength is his occasional vulgarity. That
+surely is something that we should have in greater abundance in American
+humor. I do not mean that our humorists should be pornographic and
+obscene; I mean merely that they should be allowed great freedom in
+their choice of themes. There is no humor without vulgarity. Our
+humorists have been so limited and restrained that we have no paper fit
+to be compared with _Simplicissimus_ or _Le Rire_.
+
+"You see, a vulgar thing is not offensive if it is funny. Fun for fun's
+sake is a much more important maxim than art for art's sake. The
+humorists have a greater need for freedom in choice of themes than the
+serious writers, especially the realistic writers, who are always
+demanding greater freedom."
+
+Mr. Glass returned to the subject of the failure of cosmopolitanism to
+influence American literature by calling attention to the fact that very
+few American writers find their themes among their foreign-born
+fellow-citizens. "Where," he asked, "are the German-Americans and the
+Italian-Americans? No writer knows these foreign-born citizens well
+enough to write about them. The best American stories are about native
+Americans. I admit that my stories are not about people peculiar to New
+York--you can find counterparts of 'Potash and Perlmutter' in Berlin,
+Paris, and London. But mine are not among the best stories of American
+character. The best story of American character is 'Daisy Miller.'"
+
+Mr. Glass believes that the technique of the short story has improved
+greatly during the last score of years, but he is not so favorable in
+his view of the modern novel, especially of the "cross-section of life"
+type of work. He believes that the war will produce a great revival of
+literary excellence in Europe, just as the Franco-Prussian War did; and
+he called attention to something which has apparently been neglected by
+most people who have discussed the subject--the tremendous inspiration
+which Guy de Maupassant found in the Franco-Prussian War. But he said,
+in conclusion:
+
+"But any man who sits down to judge American literature in the course of
+a few minutes' talk is an ass for his pains. Literary snap judgments are
+foolish things. Nothing that I have said to you has any value at all."
+
+
+
+
+_THE "MOVIES" BENEFIT LITERATURE_
+
+REX BEACH
+
+
+Even the most prejudiced opponent of the moving pictures will admit that
+they are becoming more intellectually respectable. Crude farce and
+melodrama are being replaced by versions of classic plays and novels;
+literature is elevating the motion picture. And Mr. Rex Beach believes
+that the motion picture is benefiting literature.
+
+This author of widely read novels had been talking to me about the
+departments of literature--the novel, the short story, and the rest--and
+among them he named the moving picture. I asked him if he believed that
+moving pictures were dangerous for novelists, leading them to fill their
+books with action, with a view to the profits of cinematographic
+reproduction. He said:
+
+"Well, authors are human beings, of course. They like to make money and
+to have their work reach as large an audience as possible. I suppose
+that the great majority of them keep their eyes on the screen, because
+they know how profitable the moving picture is and because they want
+their work seen by more people than would read their novels."
+
+"Do you think that this harms their work?" I asked.
+
+"It might if the novelists overdid it," he answered. "It would harm
+their work if they became nothing but scenario writers. But so far the
+result has been good.
+
+"The tendency of the moving picture has been to make authors visualize
+more clearly than ever before their characters and scenes that they are
+writing about. Their work has become more realistic. I do not mean
+realistic in the sense in which this word is used of some French
+writers; I do not mean erotic or morbid. I mean actual, convincing,
+clearly visualized.
+
+"Literature has elevated the moving picture, keeping it out, to a great
+extent, of melodrama and slap-stick comedy. And in return, the moving
+picture has done a service to fiction, making the authors give more
+attention to exact visualization."
+
+"Has American fiction been lacking in visualization?" I asked.
+
+"No," said Mr. Beach. "American novelists visualize more clearly to-day
+than they did four or five years ago, before the moving picture had
+become so important, but they always were strong in visualization. This
+sort of realism is America's chief contribution to fiction."
+
+"Then you believe that there is a distinctively American literature?" I
+asked. "You do not agree with the critic who said that American
+literature was 'a condition of English literature'?"
+
+"I do not agree with him," Mr. Beach replied. "American writers use the
+English language, so I suppose that what they write belongs to English
+literature. But there is a distinctively American literature; Americans
+talk in their own manner, think in their own manner, and handle business
+propositions in their own manner, and naturally they write in their own
+manner. American literature is different from other kinds of literature
+just as American business methods are different from those of Europe.
+
+"Fiction written in America must necessarily be tinged with American
+thought and American action. I have no patience with people who say
+that America has no literature. They say that nothing we are writing
+to-day will live. Well, what if that is true? It's true not only of
+literature, but of everything else.
+
+"Our roads won't last forever; they're built in a hurry to be used in a
+hurry. But they're better roads to drive and motor over than those old
+Roman roads of Europe. Our office-buildings won't last as long as the
+Pyramids, but they're better for business purposes.
+
+"Personally, I've never been enthusiastic over things that have no
+virtues but age and ugliness. I'd rather have a good, strong,
+serviceable piece of Grand Rapids furniture than any ramshackle,
+moth-eaten antique."
+
+"But don't you think," I asked, "that the permanence of a book's appeal
+is a proof of its greatness?"
+
+"I don't see how we can tell anything definite about the permanence of
+the appeal of books written in our time. And I don't mean by literature
+writings that necessarily endure through the ages. I believe that
+literature is the expression of the mind, the sentiment, the
+intellectual attitude of the people who live at the time it is written.
+I admit that our literature is ephemeral--like everything else about
+us--but I believe that it is good."
+
+Mr. Rex Beach was not pacing his floor nervously; he was crossing the
+room with the practical intention of procuring a cigarette.
+Nevertheless, his firm tread lent emphasis to his remarks.
+
+"There is a sort of literary snobbery," he said, "noticeable among
+people who condemn contemporaneous literature just because it is
+contemporaneous. The strongest proof that there is something good in the
+literature of the day is that it reaches a great audience. There must be
+something in it or people wouldn't read it.
+
+"The people are the final judges; it is to them that authors must
+appeal. Take any big question of public importance--after it has been
+discussed by politicians and newspapers, it is the people who at last
+decide it.
+
+"A man may have devoted his life to some tremendous achievement, and
+have left it as a monument to his fame. But it is to public opinion that
+we must look for the verdict on the value of his life's work.
+
+"Take Carnegie, for example; when he dies, you bet people will have his
+number! His ideas are a tremendous menace, and the people who believe
+as he does about peace will find themselves generally execrated one of
+these days.
+
+"It may seem to you that this has nothing to do with literature. But it
+has a good deal to do with it. I know that many things have been said
+about the effect on literature of the war. But I want to say that the
+war will have, I hope, one admirable effect on American writers--it will
+make them stir up the American conscience to a sense of the necessity
+for national defensive preparation. The writers must educate the people
+in world politics and show them the necessity for defensive action.
+Americans have a sort of mental inertia in regard to public questions,
+and the writers must overcome this inertia.
+
+"The writers must stir up the politicians and the people. There's been a
+whole lot of mush written about peace. There always will be war. We
+can't reform the world.
+
+"The pacifists say that it is useless to arm because war cannot be
+prevented by armaments. The obvious answer to that is that neither can
+the failure to arm prevent war. And the verdict after the war will be
+better if we are prepared for it. The writers must call our attention to
+the folly of leaving ourselves open to attack.
+
+"It's hard to reach the conscience of the American people on any big
+issue. We are too independent, too indifferent, too ready to slump back.
+That's one of the penalties of democracy, I suppose; the national sense
+of patriotism becomes atrophied. It needs some whaling-big jolt to wake
+it up. Every American writer can help to do this.
+
+"The trouble is that we have too many men with feminine minds, too many
+of these delicate fellows with handkerchiefs up their sleeves. I can't
+imagine any women with ideas more feminine than those of Bryan--could
+any woman evolve anything more feminine than his peace-at-any-price
+idea?"
+
+Mr. Beach smiled. "I suppose I should not be talking about world
+politics," he said. "There are so many men who have specialized in that
+subject and are therefore competent to talk about it. I am only a
+specialist in writing."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that writers should be specialists in writing?
+Some people believe that the best fiction, for example, is produced by
+men who do some other work for a living."
+
+"I certainly believe that a writer should devote himself to writing,"
+said Mr. Beach. "This is an age of specialization, and literature is no
+exception to the general rule. Literature is like everything else--you
+must specialize in it to be successful."
+
+"This has not always been the case, has it?" I asked. "Has literature
+been produced by people who made writing only an avocation?"
+
+"Surely," said Mr. Beach. "It is only within the last few years that
+writers have been able to write for a living and make enough to keep the
+fringe off their cuffs."
+
+I asked what had caused this change.
+
+"It has been caused chiefly by the magazines. The modern magazines have
+done two important things for fiction--they have brought it within every
+one's reach, and they have increased the prices paid to the authors,
+thus enabling them to make a living by devoting themselves exclusively
+to writing."
+
+"But it has been said," I ventured, "that a writer, no matter how
+talented he may be, cannot make a comfortable living out of writing
+fiction unless he is most extraordinarily gifted with ideas, and that,
+therefore, a writer takes a tremendous risk if he throws himself upon
+literature for support."
+
+"How is a writer going to get ideas for stories," asked Mr. Beach, in
+turn, "unless he uses ideas? The more ideas a man uses, the more ideas
+will come to him.
+
+"The imaginative quality in a man is like any other quality; the more it
+is functioned the better it is functioned. If you fail to use any organ
+of your body, nature will in time let that organ go out of commission.
+
+"It is just the same with imagination as with any organ of the body. If
+a writer waits for ideas to come to him and ceases to exercise his
+imagination, his imagination will become atrophied. But if he uses his
+imagination it will grow stronger and ideas will come to him with
+increasing frequency."
+
+Mr. Beach is an enthusiastic advocate of the moving picture. In the
+course of his discussion of it he advanced an interesting theory as to
+the next stage of its development.
+
+"The next use of the moving picture," he said, "will be the editorial
+use. We have had the moving picture used as a comic device, as a device
+to spread news, and as an interpreter of fiction. But as yet no one has
+endeavored to use it as a means to mold public opinion in great vital
+issues of the day.
+
+"Of course, it has been used educationally, and as part of various
+propaganda schemes. But it will be used in connection with great
+political problems. It will become the most powerful of all influences
+for directing public opinion in politics and in everything else.
+
+"It will play a mighty part in the thought of the country and of the
+world.
+
+"I have seen men and women coming from a great moving-picture show
+almost hysterical with emotion. I have heard them shout and stamp and
+whistle at what they saw flashed before them on a white sheet as they
+never did in any theater.
+
+"What a strong argument 'The Birth of a Nation' presents! Now, suppose
+that same art and that same equipment were used to present arguments
+about some political issue of our own time, instead of one of our
+fathers' time. What a force that would be!"
+
+
+
+
+_WHAT IS GENIUS?_
+
+ROBERT W. CHAMBERS
+
+
+Sentimental Tommy's great predecessor in the relentless pursuit of the
+"right word" was, teachers of literature tell us, the unsentimental
+Gustave Flaubert. But these academic gentlemen, who insist that the
+writer shall spend hours, even days, if necessary, in perfecting a
+single sentence, seldom produce any literature. I asked Robert W.
+Chambers, who has written more "best sellers" than any other living
+writer, what he thought of Flaubert's method of work.
+
+He looked at me rather quizzically. "I think," he said, with a smile,
+"that Flaubert was slow. What else is there to think? Of course he was a
+matchless workman. But if he spent half a day in hunting for one word,
+he was slow, that's all. He might have gone on writing and then have
+come back later for that inevitable word."
+
+"But what do you think of Flaubert's method, as a method?" I asked. "Do
+you think that a writer who works with such laborious care is right?"
+
+"It's not a question of right or wrong," said Mr. Chambers, "it's a
+question of the individual writer's ability and tendency. If a man can
+produce novels like those of Flaubert, by writing slowly and
+laboriously, by all means let him write that way. But it would not be
+fair to establish that as the only legitimate method of writing.
+
+"Some authors always write slowly. With some of them it's like pulling
+teeth for them to get their ideas out on paper. It's the same way in
+painting. You may see half a dozen men drawing from the same model. One
+will make his sketch premier coup; another will devote an hour to his;
+another will work all day. They may be artists of equal ability. It is
+the result that counts, not the method or the time."
+
+"And what is it that makes a man an artist, in pigments or in words?" I
+asked. "Do you believe in the old saying that the poet--the creative
+artist--is born and not made?"
+
+"No," said Mr. Chambers, "I do not think that that is the truth. I think
+that with regard to the writer it is true to this extent, that there
+must exist, in the first place, the inclination to write, to express
+ideas in written words. Then the writer must have something to express
+really worthy of expression, and he must learn how to express it. These
+three things make the writer--the inclination to say something, the
+possession of something worth saying, and the knowledge of how to say
+it."
+
+"And where does genius come in?" I asked.
+
+"What is genius?" asked Mr. Chambers, in turn. "I don't know. Perhaps
+genius is the combination of these three qualities in the highest
+degree.
+
+"Of course," he added, with a laugh, "I know that all this is contrary
+to the opinion of the public. People like to believe that writers depend
+entirely upon an inspiration. They like to think that we are a hazy lot,
+sitting around and posing and waiting for some sort of divine afflatus.
+They think that writers sit around like a Quaker meeting, waiting for
+the spirit to move them."
+
+"But have there not been writers," I asked, "who seem to prove that
+there is some truth in the inspiration theory? There is William de
+Morgan, for example, beginning to write novels in his old age. He spent
+most of his life in working in ceramics, not with words."
+
+"On the contrary," said Mr. Chambers, "I think that William de Morgan
+proves my theory. He really spent all his life in learning to write--he
+was in training for being a novelist all the while. The novelist's
+training may be unconscious. He must have--as William de Morgan surely
+always has had--keen interest in the world. That is the main thing for
+the writer to have--a vivid interest in life. If we are to devote
+ourselves to the production of pictures of humanity according to our own
+temperaments, we must have this vivid interest in life; we must have
+intense curiosity. The men who have counted in literature have had this
+intense, never-satiated curiosity about life.
+
+"This is true for the romanticists as well as the realists. The most
+imaginative and fantastic romances must have their basis in real life.
+
+"I know of no better examples of this truth than the gargoyles which one
+sees in Gothic architecture in Europe. These extraordinary creatures
+that thrust their heads from the sides of cathedrals, misshapen and
+grotesque, are nevertheless thoroughly logical. That is, no matter how
+fantastic they may be, they have backbones and ribs and tails, and these
+backbones and ribs and tails are logical--that is, they could do what
+backbones and ribs and tails are supposed to do.
+
+"In real life there are no creatures like the gargoyles, but the
+important thing is that the gargoyles really could exist. This is a good
+example of the true method of construction. The base of the construction
+must rest on real knowledge. The medieval sculptors knew the formation
+of existing animals; therefore they knew how to make gargoyles."
+
+"How does this theory apply to poets?" I asked.
+
+"I don't know," answered Mr. Chambers, "but it seems to me to apply to
+all creative work. The artist must know life before he can build even a
+travesty on life."
+
+I called Mr. Chambers's attention to the work of certain ultra-modern
+poets who deliberately exclude life from their work. He was not inclined
+to take them seriously.
+
+"There always have been aberrations," he said, "and there always will
+be. They're bound to exist. And there is bound to be, from time to time,
+attitudinizing and straining after effect on the part of prose writers
+as well as poets. And it is all based on one thing--self-consciousness.
+It is self-consciousness that spoils the work of some modern writers."
+
+I asked Mr. Chambers to be more specific in his allusions. "I cannot
+mention names," he said, "but there are certain writers who are always
+conscious of the style in which they are writing. Sometimes they
+consciously write in the style of some other men. They are thinking all
+the while of their technique and equipment, and the result is that their
+work loses its effect. A writer should not be convinced all the while
+that he is a realist or a romanticist; he should not subject himself
+deliberately to some special school of writing, and certainly he should
+not be conscious of his own style. The less a writer thinks of his
+technique the sooner he arrives at self-expression.
+
+"It's just like ordinary conversation. A man is known by the way in
+which he talks--that is his 'style.' But he is not all the while acutely
+conscious of his manner of talking--unless he has an impediment in his
+speech. So the writer should be known by his untrammeled and
+unembarrassed expression."
+
+I asked Mr. Chambers what he thought of the idea that the popularity of
+magazines has vitiated the public taste and lowered the standard of
+fiction.
+
+"I do not think that this is the case," he said. "I do not see that the
+custom of serial publication has harmed the novel. It is not a modern
+innovation, you know. The novels of Dickens, Thackeray, and George Eliot
+had serial publication. But I do believe that the American public reads
+less fiction than it did a generation ago, and that its taste is not so
+good as it was."
+
+This was a surprising statement to come from an author whom the public
+has received with such enthusiasm, so I asked Mr. Chambers to explain.
+
+"In the days of our forefathers," he said, "this was an Anglo-Saxon
+country. Then the average intelligence of the nation was higher and the
+taste in literature better. But there came the great rush of immigration
+to the United States from Europe, and the Anglo-Saxon culture of the
+country was diluted.
+
+"You see signs of this lowered standard of taste in fiction and on
+the stage. The demand is for primitive and childish stuff, and the
+reason for this is that the audience has only a sort of backstairs
+intelligence. If we had progressed along the lines in which we were
+headed before this wave of immigration, we would not be satisfied with
+the books and magazines that are given us to-day.
+
+"Of course the magazines are mechanically better to-day than they were a
+generation ago. Then we had not the photogravure and the half-tone and
+the other processes that make our magazines beautiful. But we had better
+taste and also we had more leisure.
+
+"I remember when one of the most widely read of our magazines was a
+popular science monthly, which printed articles by great scientists on
+biological and other topics. That was in the days when Darwin was
+announcing his theory of evolution--the first great jolt which orthodoxy
+received. People would not take time to read a magazine of that sort
+now. They are so occupied with business and dancing and all sorts of
+occupations that they have little leisure for reading."
+
+Mr. Chambers stopped talking suddenly and laughed. "I'm not a good man
+for you to bring these questions to," he said, "because I never have had
+any special reverence for books or literature as such. I reverence the
+books that I like, not all books."
+
+"And have you such a thing as a favorite author?" I asked.
+
+"Yes," said Mr. Chambers. "Dumas."
+
+During the 1870's Mr. Chambers was an art student in Paris, and he has
+many interesting memories of the French and English writers and painters
+who have made that period memorable. He knew Paul Verlaine (whose poetry
+he greatly admires), Charles Conder, and Aubrey Beardsley.
+
+"One day," he said, "I was out on a shooting-trip--I think it was in
+Belgium--and I met a young English poet, a charming fellow, whose work I
+was later to know and like. It was the poet who wrote at least one great
+poem--'Cynara'--it was Ernest Dowson.
+
+"I knew many of the Beaux Arts crowd, because my brother was a student
+of architecture at the Beaux Arts. And they were a decent, clean
+crowd--they were not 'decadents.' I do not take much stock in the pose
+of 'decadence,' nor in the artistic temperament. I never saw a real
+artist with the artistic temperament. I always associated that with
+weakness."
+
+Mr. Chambers, although he has intimate knowledge of the Quartier Latin,
+has little use for "Bohemia."
+
+"What is Bohemia?" he asked. "If it is a place where a number of artists
+huddle together for the sake of animal warmth, I have nothing to say
+against it. But if it is a place where a number of artists come to
+scorn the world, then it is a dangerous thing. The artist should not
+separate himself from the world.
+
+"These artistic and literary cults are wrong. I do not believe in
+professional clubs and cliques. If writers form a combination for
+business reasons, that is all right, but a writer should not associate
+exclusively with other writers; he should do his work and then go out
+and see and talk to people in other professions. We should sweep the
+cobwebs from the profession of writing and not try to fence it in from
+the public."
+
+To the somewhat trite question as to the effects of the war on
+literature, Mr. Chambers made first his usual modest answer, "I don't
+know." But when I told him of the author who had dogmatically stated
+that war always stops literature, and that the Civil War had produced no
+writing worthy of preservation, Mr. Chambers reconsidered.
+
+"Did he say that the Civil War had produced no literature worthy of
+preservation?" he said. "He must have forgotten that the Civil War
+caused one man to make contributions to our literature as valuable as
+anything we possess. He must have forgotten Abraham Lincoln."
+
+Before I left, I mentioned to Mr. Chambers the theory that literature
+is better as a staff than as a crutch, as an avocation than as a
+vocation. This, like the "inevitable word" theory, is greatly beloved by
+college professors. Mr. Chambers said:
+
+"I disagree utterly with that theory. Do you remember how Dr. Johnson
+wrote _Rasselas_? It was in order to raise the money to pay for his
+mother's funeral. I believe that the best work is done under pressure.
+Of course the work must be enjoyed; a man in choosing a profession
+should select that sort of work which he prefers to do in his leisure
+moments. Let him do for his lifework the task which he would select for
+his leisure--and let him not take himself too seriously!"
+
+
+
+
+_DETERIORATION OF THE SHORT STORY_
+
+JAMES LANE ALLEN
+
+
+That Edgar Allan Poe, in spite of his acknowledged genius, has had
+practically no influence on the development of the short story in
+America, and that the current short story written in America is inferior
+to that written during the years between 1870 and 1895, these are two
+remarkable statements made to me by James Lane Allen, the distinguished
+author of _The Choir Invisible_, _The Mettle of the Pasture_, and many
+another memorable novel.
+
+I found Mr. Allen in the pleasant workroom of his New York residence.
+Himself a Southerner, he is an enthusiastic admirer of the poet whose
+name is inseparably linked with Southern letters. But I was soon to find
+that he does not share the opinion of those who consider Poe the
+originator of the modern short story, nor does he rate Poe's influence
+in fiction as very wide.
+
+"There is always much interest in short stories," he said, "among
+authors, and in the great body of readers. You say that Mr. Gouverneur
+Morris believes that except Poe almost no writer before our generation
+could write short stories.
+
+"I do not wish to be placed in a position of publicly criticizing Mr.
+Gouverneur Morris's opinion of the short story. But it may not seem
+antagonistic to the opinion of any one to call attention to the fact
+that, of all American short stories yet written, the two most widely
+known in and outside our country were written independently of Poe.
+These are _The Man Without a Country_ and _Rip Van Winkle_.
+
+"As the technique of the American short story is understood and applied
+to-day, neither of these two stories can be regarded as a work of
+impeccable art. But flaws have not kept them from fame. By a common
+verdict the flawless short stories of the day are fameless. Certainly,
+also, Hawthorne was uninfluenced by Poe in writing short stories that
+remain secure among brief American classics.
+
+"This, of course, is limiting the outlook to our own literature. Beyond
+our literature, what of Balzac? In the splendor of his achievements with
+the novel, Balzac has perhaps been slighted as a master of the short
+story. Think, for instance, of such a colossal fragment as _The Atheists
+Mass_.
+
+"And what of Boccaccio? For centuries before Poe, the _Decameron_ shone
+before the eyes of the world as the golden treasury of model forms for
+the short story.
+
+"And centuries before Boccaccio, flashing from hand to hand all over the
+world, there was a greater treasury still, the treasury of _The Arabian
+Nights_.
+
+"It is no disparagement to Poe to say that his genius did not
+originate the genius of the short story. His true place, his logical
+place, in the development of the short story is that of a man with
+ancestors--naturally!
+
+"Since there is a breath of nativity blowing through his stories, I
+think it is the breath of far distant romance from somewhere. Certainly
+his stories are as remote from our civilization and from all things
+American as are Oriental tales."
+
+Mr. Allen showed he had given much thought to Edgar Allan Poe's place
+among the American fiction writers, so I thought that he might also have
+some interesting things to say about Poe as a poet. He had. He mentioned
+a quality of Poe's verse which for some reason or other seems
+heretofore to have escaped the notice of students of American poetry.
+
+"It may be worth while calling attention," he said, "to the fact that
+nearly all of Poe's poems belong to the night. Twelve o'clock noon never
+strikes to his poetic genius. His best poems are Poe's Nights, if not
+_Arabian Nights_.
+
+"There is a saying that the German novel long ago died of the full moon.
+To Poe the dead moon was the orb of life. The sun blotted him out."
+
+Great as is his admiration for Poe's genius, Mr. Allen does not believe
+he has greatly influenced American prose. He said:
+
+"As to the influence of Poe's short stories in our country, this seems
+to be a tradition mainly fostered by professors of English in American
+universities and by the historians of our literature. The tradition does
+not prevail among American writers. Actually there is no traceable stamp
+of the influence of his prose writings on the work of any American
+short-story writer known to me, save one. That one is Ambrose Bierce."
+
+"Why is it," I asked, "that Poe's influence on American fiction has been
+so slight?"
+
+"The main reason," Mr. Allen answered, "why Poe's stories have remained
+outside American imitation or emulation is perhaps because they are
+projected outside American sympathies. They lie to-day where they lay
+when they were written--beyond the confines of what the German calls the
+literature of the soil.
+
+"Poe and Ambrose Bierce are at least to be linked in this: that they are
+the two greatest and the two coldest of all American short-story
+writers. Any living American fictionist will perhaps bear testimony to
+the fact that he has never met any other writer who has been influenced
+by the stories of Poe."
+
+"Mr. Allen," I said, "you believe that the American short story has not
+been influenced by Poe; has the American short story, however, improved
+since his time?"
+
+"The renascence of the American short story," said Mr. Allen,
+thoughtfully, "its real efflorescence as a natural literary art form,
+took place after the close of the Civil War. The historians of our
+literature have, perhaps, as is customary with them, held to the strict
+continuity of tradition as explaining this renascence. If so, they have
+omitted one of the instinctive forces of human nature, which invariably
+act in nations that have literatures and act ungovernably at the
+termination of all wars.
+
+"After any war spontaneity in story-telling is one of the ungovernable
+impulses of human nature. This can be traced from modern literature back
+to primitive man returning from his feuds. When he had no literature, he
+carved his story on the walls of his cave or on a bone to tell the glory
+of the fight. Before he could even carve a bone he hung up a row of the
+heads of the defeated. Perhaps the original form of the war short story
+was a good, thick volume of heads. Within our own civilization the
+American Indian told his short stories in this way--with American heads
+or tufts of scalps--a sad way of telling them for our forefathers.
+
+"At the close of the American Civil War the atmosphere, both North and
+South, was charged with stories. The amazing fact is not that short
+stories should have begun at that time, but that they should have begun
+with such perfection. This perfection expressed itself more richly
+during the period, say, from 1870 to 1895--twenty-five years--than it
+has ever done since.
+
+"The evidence is at hand that the best of the American short stories
+written during that period outweigh in value those that have been
+written later--with the exception of those of one man. And this evidence
+takes this form--that these stories were collected into volumes, had an
+enormous sale, had the highest critical appreciation, have passed into
+the histories of literature written since, have gone into the courses of
+English literature now being taught in the universities, and are still
+steadily being sold.
+
+"Is this true of the best short stories being written now? Are any of
+the short stories written since that period being bound into volumes and
+extensively sold? Do the professors of English literature recommend them
+to their classes? That is the practical test.
+
+"The one exception is O. Henry. He alone stands out in the later period
+as a world within himself; as much apart from any one else as are
+Hawthorne and Poe."
+
+Mr. Allen did not express an opinion as to the probable effects on
+literature of the war. He said:
+
+"Now, the North and the South in the renascence of the short story after
+the Civil War divide honors about equally. But it is impossible to speak
+of the Southern short story, or indeed of Southern literature at all,
+without being brought to the brink of a subject which lies back of the
+whole philosophy of Southern literature."
+
+Mr. Allen paused for a moment. Then he continued, speaking with an
+intensity which reminded me of his Southern birth and upbringing:
+
+"Suppose that at the end of the present European war Germany should be
+victorious and France defeated. And suppose that in France there should
+not be left a single publishing-house, a single literary periodical, a
+single literary editor, a single critic, and scarcely even a single
+buyer of books.
+
+"And suppose that the defeated French people wanted to cry out their
+soul over their defeat and against their conquerors. And suppose that in
+order to do this every French novelist, short-story writer, or poet,
+unable to keep silent, should begin to write and begin to send his novel
+or his short story or his poem over into Germany to be read by a German
+editor, published by a German publisher, and sold in a German bookshop
+to a German reader. What kind of French literature of the war do you
+think would appear in Germany and be fostered there?
+
+"But this is exactly what happened after the war between the North and
+the South.
+
+"The few voices that began to be sent northward across the demolished
+battle-line could only be the voices that would be listened to and
+welcomed on the other side. That is the reason why that first literature
+was so mild, so tempered, so thin, so devitalized, that it seemed not to
+come from an enraged people, but from the memories of their ghosts.
+
+"As a result of finding war literature inexpressible in such conditions,
+the young generation of Southerners dropped the theme of war altogether
+and explored other paths. So that perhaps the most original and
+spontaneous fragments of this new Southern post-bellum literature are in
+the regions of the imagination, where no note of war is heard.
+
+"It is not beyond the bounds of possibility that if Joel Chandler
+Harris, a young Southerner, had possessed full freedom to wreak his
+genius on the war, the world might never have heard of 'Uncle Remus.'
+The world might never have known that among the cotton-plantations there
+dwelt a brother to Æsop and to La Fontaine."
+
+
+
+
+_SOME HARMFUL INFLUENCES_
+
+HARRY LEON WILSON
+
+
+From the Pacific Coast--from what is enthusiastically termed "the Golden
+West"--from that section of the United States which is large and
+chivalrous and gladly suffers suffrage--comes a voice, replying to my
+question: "What is the matter with contemporary fiction?"
+
+And the voice says, "_Cherchez la femme!_"
+
+It is the voice of Mr. Harry Leon Wilson, author of _Bunker Bean_,
+_Ruggles of Red Gap_, and many another popular novel, and co-author with
+Mr. Booth Tarkington of several successful plays. Mr. Wilson believes
+that the dullness and insincerity of our novels are due to the taste of
+most of their readers--that is, to the taste of the women.
+
+I asked Mr. Wilson what, in his opinion, was the influence most harmful
+to the development of literature in America.
+
+"I know little about literature," Mr. Wilson replied, "but if you mean
+the novel, I should say the intense satisfaction with it as it is, of
+the maker, the seller, and the buyer. And to trace this baneful
+satisfaction to its source, I should say it lies in the lack of a
+cultivated taste in our women readers of fiction.
+
+"Publishers are agreed, I believe, that women buy the great bulk of
+their output. The current novel is as deliberately planned to please the
+woman buyer as is any other bit of trade goods. The publisher knows what
+she wants to read, the writer finds out from the publisher, and you can
+see the result in the advertisements--and the writer's royalty
+statements.
+
+"'We want,' says the publisher, 'a stunning girl for the cover and a
+corking good love interest to catch the women.' (Publishers do talk that
+way when they have safely locked themselves in their low dens.)
+
+"This love interest is always said to be wholesome and sweet. I don't
+know. Certainly it is sweet enough. In the trade novel it's as if you
+took a segment of rich layer cake, the chocolate-and-jelly kind, poured
+over it a half-pint of nice thick molasses, and then, just to make sure,
+sprinkled this abundantly with fine sugar.
+
+"Anyway, that's what the publisher has found--and he has the best means
+of knowing--that the American woman will buy year in and year out. And
+you can't blame him for printing it. A publisher with ideals of his own
+couldn't last any longer than a grocer with ideals of his own, or a
+clergyman.
+
+"And least of all can you blame the author for writing this slush,
+because nine times out of ten he doesn't know any better. How should he,
+with no one to tell him?
+
+"And that," said Mr. Wilson, "is another evil almost as great in its
+influence as the undeveloped taste of our women readers. I mean our lack
+of authoritative criticism. Now we really do get a good novel once in a
+blue moon, but one who has been made wary by the mass of trade novels
+would never suspect it from reading our book reviews. The good novel, it
+is true, is praised heartily, but then so are all the bad novels--and
+how is one to tell?
+
+"At least eighty-five per cent. of our book reviews are mere amiable,
+perfunctory echoes of the enthusiastic 'canned' review which the
+publisher obligingly prints on the paper jacket of his best seller. I
+sometimes suspect this task is allotted to a member of the staff who is
+known to be 'fond of reading.'
+
+"Another evil influence is often alleged--the pressure the business
+office puts on the reviewer to be tender with novels that are lavishly
+advertised, but I have never thought there was more than a grain of
+truth in this.
+
+"Perhaps a publisher wouldn't continue to patronize a sheet that
+habitually blurted out the truth about his best sellers, but I really
+doubt that this was ever put to an issue. I don't believe the average
+book-reviewer knows any better than the average novelist the difference
+between a good and a bad novel.
+
+"It isn't so with the other arts. We have critics for those. Music,
+sculpture, painting--we know the best and get the best.
+
+"But, then, the novel is scarcely considered to be an art form. Any one
+can--and does--write a novel, if he can only find the time. It isn't
+supposed to be a thing one must study, like plumbing or architecture.
+
+"The novelist who wants to write a best seller this year studies the
+best seller of last year, and wisely, because that is what the publisher
+wants--something like his last one that sold big. He is looking for it
+night and day and for nothing else. He wants good carpenters who have
+followed the design that women have liked. Fiction is the one art you
+don't take seriously, and there is no one to tell us we should; there
+are no critics to inform the writers and the readers and make the
+publishers timid.
+
+"True, we have in this country two or three, possibly four, critics who
+can speak with authority, men who know what the novel has been, what it
+is with us, what it ought to be. One of them is a friend of mine, and I
+reproached him lately for not speaking out in meeting oftener.
+
+"His defense was pathetic. First, that ninety out of a hundred of our
+novels are beneath criticism. Second, as to the remaining ten that would
+merit the rapier instead of the bludgeon--'criticism is harder to sell
+than post-meridian virtue. I have tried.'
+
+"And he has to eat as often as any publisher. So there you are! People
+are not going to pay him for finding fault with something they are
+intensely satisfied with. It all comes back to the women. When their
+taste is corrected we shall have better novels. But not before then!"
+
+"Mr. Wilson," I said, "do you believe that the development of the
+magazine, with its high prices and serialization, has been harmful or
+beneficial to fiction?"
+
+"In the first place, the magazine hasn't developed," he answered. "It
+has merely multiplied--the cheap ones, I mean. And prices have not
+increased except to about a dozen of our national favorites. Where there
+is one writer who can get fifteen hundred dollars for a short story, or
+fifteen thousand dollars for the serial rights to a novel, there are a
+thousand who can get not more than a fifteenth of those prices.
+
+"On the whole, I think that the effect of the cheap monthlies has been
+good. They are the only ones that welcome the new writer. They try him
+out. Then, if the public takes to him, the better magazines find it out
+after a while and form an alliance with him--that is, if his characters
+are so sweet and wholesome that the magazine can still be left on the
+center-table where Cuthbert or Berryl might see it after school.
+
+"Nowadays I never expect to find a good short story in any of the cheap
+magazines. Of course, it does happen now and then, but not often enough
+to make me impatient for their coming. And, of course, the cheap
+monthlies do print, for the most part, what are probably the worst
+short stories that will ever be written in the world--the very furthest
+from anything real.
+
+"These writers, too, like the novelists, study one another instead of
+life. We will say one of them writes a short story about a pure young
+shopgirl of flower-like beauty who, spending an evening of innocent
+recreation in a notorious Tenderloin dive (one of those places that I,
+for one, have never been able to find), is insulted by the leader of
+Tammany Hall, who is always hanging around there for evil purposes. At
+the last moment she is saved from his loathsome advances by a dashing
+young stranger in a cute-cut blue serge suit, who carries her off in a
+taxicab and marries her at 2 A.M. And he, of course, proves to be the
+great traction magnate who owns all the city's surface-car lines.
+
+"The other writers, and some new ones that never before thought of
+writing, read this story, which is called 'All for Love,' and learn to
+do the 'type'--the pure young shopgirl, a bit slangy in spite of her
+flower-like beauty; the abhorrent politician (some day he will have a
+distressing mix-up with his very own daughter in one of these evil
+places--see if he doesn't!), the low-browed dive-keeper, and the honest
+young traction magnate. They will learn with a little practice to do
+these as the dupes of the 'Be-a-cartoonist!' schools learn to draw 'An
+Irishman,' 'A German,' 'A Jew,' and the dental façade of Colonel
+Roosevelt.
+
+"But we must remember that O. Henry came to us from the cheap magazines,
+never did get into the higher-priced ones, and was, by the way,
+wretchedly paid for his stories. True, he received good prices in his
+later days, but I doubt if they raised the average for his output to two
+hundred dollars a story. He neglected to come to the feast in a wedding
+garment, so the more pretentious magazines would have none of him.
+
+"For one O. Henry, then, we can forgive the lesser monthlies for the
+bulk of their stuff that can be read only by born otoliths. The more
+magazines, the better our chance of finding the new man, and only in the
+cheap ones can he come to life."
+
+Many dogmatic statements have been made concerning the great American
+novel. I have been told that it would come from the South, that it would
+come from the West, that it would never be written. But Mr. Wilson has a
+new and revolutionary theory.
+
+"Will there," I asked, "ever be the great American novel? That is, will
+there ever be a novel which reflects American life as adequately as
+_Vanity Fair_ reflects English life?"
+
+"There have already been dozens of them!" was Mr. Wilson's emphatic
+reply. "To go no farther back, Booth Tarkington wrote one the other day,
+and so did Theodore Dreiser. (Dreiser's story, 'The "Genius,"' of course
+couldn't have appeared in any American magazine. Trust your canny
+publisher not to let his magazine hand know what his book hand is
+doing!)
+
+"But let us lay forever that dear old question that has haunted our
+literary columns for so many years. The answer, of course, is that there
+is no novel that reflects English life any more adequately than _The
+Turmoil_, or '_The Genius_,' or _The Virginian_, or _Perch of the
+Devil_, or _Unleavened Bread_, or _The Rise of Silas Lapham_ reflects
+American life.
+
+"Certainly _Vanity Fair_ doesn't do this. It reflects but a very narrow
+section of London life. For the purposes of fictional portrayal England
+is just as big and difficult--as impossible in one novel--as the United
+States.
+
+"To know England through fiction one must go to all her artists, past
+and present, getting a little from each. Hardy gives us an England that
+Thackeray never suspected, and Galsworthy gives us still another, not to
+go on to the England of George Moore, Phillpotts, Quiller-Couch, Wells,
+Bennett, Walpole, George, or Mackenzie. I hope at the proper time that a
+tasteful little tablet will be erected to my memory for having laid this
+ancient and highly respectable apparition."
+
+In his interesting contribution to a symposium of opinions as to what
+are the six best novels in the English language, Mr. Wilson had some
+things to say about Dickens which were not likely to bring him a vote of
+thanks from the Dickens Fellowship. I wished to have his opinion of
+Dickens stated more definitely, and so, basing my question on a
+statement he had made in the symposium, I asked, "What qualities in the
+work of Charles Dickens make him a bad model for novelists to follow?"
+
+Mr. Wilson replied: "Dickens has been a blight to most writers who were
+susceptible to his vices. He was a great humorist, but an inferior
+novelist, and countless other inferior novelists have believed that they
+could be great humorists by following his childishly easy formula.
+
+"That is, those who were influenced by him copy his faults. Witness our
+school of characterization based on the Dickens method, a school holding
+that 'character' is a mere trick of giving your creation exaggerated
+mannerisms or physical surfaces--as with Dickens it was rarely anything
+else.
+
+"Dickens created vaudeville 'characters'--unsurpassed for twenty-minute
+sketches, deadly beyond that to the mentally mature. His stock in trade
+was the grotesque make-up. In stage talk he couldn't create a 'straight'
+part.
+
+"Strip his people of their make-ups, verbal, hirsute, sartorial,
+surgical, pathological, what not--and dummies remain. Meet them once and
+you know them for the rest of the tale, the Micawbers, Gamps,
+Pecksniffs, Nicklebys; each has his stunt and does it over and over at
+each new meeting, to the--for me, at least--maddening delay of the
+melodrama. I like melodrama as well as any one, badgered heroines,
+falsely accused heroes, missing wills, trap-doors, disguised
+philanthropists, foul murders, and even slow-dying children who are not
+only moralists, but orators; and I like to see the villain get his at
+last, and get it good; but I can't read Dickens any more, because the
+tale must be held up every five minutes for one of the funny
+'characters' to do his stunt.
+
+"How many years will it take us--writers, I mean--to realize that there
+are no characters in Dickens in the sense that Dmitri in _The Brothers
+Caramazov_ is a character? How few of our current novelists can
+distinguish between the soulless caricaturing of Dickens and the genuine
+character-drawing of a Turgenieff or a Dostoievski!
+
+"How few of us can see how the soul of Dmitri is slowly unfolded to the
+reader with never a bit of make-up! To this moment, I don't know if he
+wore a beard or not; but I know the man. Dickens would have given him
+funny whiskers, astigmatism, a shortened leg, a purple nose, and still
+to make sure we wouldn't mistake him a catch phrase for his utterance.
+
+"Any novelist who has mastered the rudiments of his craft, even though
+he hasn't an atom of humor in his make-up, can write a Dickens novel,
+and any publisher will print it for the Christmas trade if it's fairly
+workman-like, and it will be warmly praised in the reviews. That happens
+every season.
+
+"And that's why Dickens is a bad model. If one must have a model, why
+not Hall Caine, infinitely the superior of Dickens as a craftsman? Of
+course, having no humor, he can't be read by people who have, but he
+knows his trade, where Dickens was a preposterous blunderer."
+
+Charles Belmont Davis once told me that a novelist should have some
+other regular occupation besides writing. I asked Mr. Wilson his opinion
+on this subject.
+
+"Mr. Davis didn't originate this theory," he said. "It's older than he
+is. Anyway, I don't believe in it. I know of no business to-day that
+would leave a man time to write novels, and a novelist worth his salt
+won't have time for any other business.
+
+"Of course, the ideal novelist would at one time or another have been
+anything. The ideal novelist has two passions, people and words, and he
+should have had and should continue to have as many points of contact
+with life as possible. But if he has reached the point where he can
+write to please me, I want him not to waste time doing anything else.
+
+"Personally, I wish I might have been, for varying intervals, a Russian
+Grand Duke, an Eighth Avenue undertaker, the manager of a
+five-and-ten-cent store, a head waiter, a burglar, a desk sergeant at
+the Thirtieth Street Police Station, and a malefactor of great wealth,
+preferably one that gets into the snapshots at Newport, reading from
+left to right. But Heaven has denied me practically all of these avenues
+to a knowledge of my humankind, and I am too busy keeping up with the
+current styles of all millinery fiction to take to any of them at this
+late day.
+
+"Besides, I have a bad example to deter me, having just read _The High
+Priestess_, by Robert Grant, who has another business than novel
+writing--something connected with the law, I believe, in Boston. I have
+no means of knowing how valuable a civic unit he may have been in his
+home town, but I do feel that he has cheated the world of a great deal
+by keeping to this other business, whatever it may be.
+
+"From the author of _Unleavened Bread_ we once had a right to expect
+much. But _The High Priestess_ chiefly makes me regret that he didn't
+have to write novels or starve; by its virtues of construction, which
+are many and admirable, and by its utter lack of power to communicate
+any emotion whatsoever, which is conspicuous and lamentable. He seems to
+have written his novel with an adding-machine, and instinctively I
+blame that 'other business' of his, in which he seems to have
+forgotten--for he did know it once--that a novelist may or may not think
+straight, but he must feel.
+
+"Perhaps he wasn't a real novelist, after all. I suspect a real novelist
+would starve in any other business."
+
+I told Mr. Wilson that a prominent American humorist writer had classed
+Mark Twain with Artemus Ward and Philander Doesticks, and said that
+these men were not genuine humorists, but "the Charlie Chaplins of their
+time."
+
+Mr. Wilson smiled. "Isn't this rather high praise for Charlie Chaplin?"
+he asked. "How far is this idolatry of the movie actor to go, anyway?
+True, Mr. Chaplin is a skilled comedian, pre-eminent in his curious new
+profession, but to my thinking he lacks repose at those supreme moments
+when he is battering the faces of his fellow-histrions with the wet mop
+or the stuffed club, or walking on their stomachs; but I may be
+prejudiced. I know I shouldn't have ranked him with Mark Twain,
+arch-humanist and satirist and one of the few literary artists who have
+attained the world stature--so that we must go back and back to
+Cervantes to find his like."
+
+
+
+
+_THE PASSING OF THE SNOB_
+
+EDWARD S. MARTIN
+
+
+If William Makepeace Thackeray were alive to-day he would not write a
+_Book of Snobs_. He might write a _Book of Reformers_.
+
+This is the opinion of that shrewd and kindly satirist, Edward S.
+Martin. I found him not in New York, the city whose lights and shadows
+are reflected in much of his graceful prose and pungent verse, but out
+among the Connecticut hills. In the pleasant study of his quaint
+Colonial cottage he talked about the thing he delights to
+observe--humanity.
+
+"Thackeray would not write a _Book of Snobs_ to-day," he said. "The snob
+is not now the appealing subject that he was in the early days of the
+reign of Queen Victoria. Thackeray could not now find enough snobs and
+snobbery to write about, either in England or in America. Snobs are by
+way of having punctured tires these days.
+
+"Don't you think that the snobs were always very much apart from our
+civilization and national ideals? They were a symptom of an established
+and conservative society. And this established and conservative society
+Thackeray in his way helped to break down.
+
+"To-day, in England and in the United States, that kind of society is in
+a precarious condition. If Thackeray were now writing, he would not
+satirize snobs. It is more likely that he would satirize the reformers.
+I think that all the snobs have hit the sawdust trail."
+
+"How did this happen?" I asked. "What was it that did away with the
+snobs?"
+
+"It was largely a natural process of change," said Mr. Martin. "The
+snobs were put on the defensive. You see, there is a harder push of
+democracy now than there was in Thackeray's time. The world of which the
+snob was so conspicuous a part seems, especially since the war began, to
+have passed away. Of course the literature of that world is not dead,
+but for the moment it seems obsolete.
+
+"To-day the whole attention of civilized mankind is fixed on the great
+fundamental problems; there is no time for snobbery. For one thing,
+there is the problem of national self-preservation. And there has
+recently been before the civilized world, more strongly than ever
+before, the great problem of the development of democracy.
+
+"I suppose that the war will check, to a certain extent, the development
+of democracy. In England the great task of the hour is to organize all
+the powers of society for defense against attack, against attack by a
+power organized for forty years for that attack.
+
+"I suppose England will get organization out of this war. And if we get
+into the war, we'll get organization out of it."
+
+Mr. Martin is generally thought of as a critic of social rather than
+political conditions. But he is keenly interested in politics. Speaking
+of American politics and the possibility of America's entering the war,
+he said:
+
+"For the past fifteen years our greatest activity in politics has been
+to rip things open. It seemed to most people that the organization was
+getting too strong and that it was controlled by too few people. The
+fight has been against that condition.
+
+"But if we became involved in a serious war trouble the energy of our
+people would be directed to an attempt to secure increased efficiency.
+We would become closely organized again. I don't think we'd lose the
+benefit of what has been done in the past years, but we would come to a
+turn in the road.
+
+"I suppose it would bring us all together, if we got into this war, and
+I suppose we'd get some good out of it.
+
+"You see, the people who formerly directed our Government haven't had
+much power for several years. Now they are valuable people. And they
+will come back into power again, but with greatly modified conditions.
+
+"I don't think that a new set of people are going to manage the affairs
+of the nation. I think that the affairs of the nation will be managed by
+the people who managed them before. But these people will be much more
+under control than they were before, and they will be subject to new
+laws.
+
+"How much good government by commission is going to do I don't know. We
+have not as yet had good enough men to enter into this important work,
+and the best of those who have entered have not stayed in this
+employment. So the development of experts in government has not come
+along as well as people hoped it would."
+
+The genial philosopher smiled quizzically and rose from his chair.
+
+"I'm afraid I'm getting too political," he said, pacing slowly up and
+down the room. "Let's get back to snobs and snobbery.
+
+"You asked me a few minutes ago why the snob had become so inconspicuous
+a figure in our modern society. Well, I know one reason for this altered
+condition of affairs. Woman has abolished the snob. Woman has changed
+man."
+
+"And what changed woman?" I asked.
+
+"Many things; the development of machinery, for instance," he replied.
+"Woman has not changed so much as the conditions of life have changed.
+
+"The development of machinery has caused changes that impress me deeply.
+It has produced immense alterations in the conditions of life and in the
+relations between people.
+
+"War has been changed in a striking manner by this development of
+machinery. Never in the history of warfare was machinery so prominent
+and important as to-day. In fact, I think I am justified in speaking of
+this war as a machine-bore!
+
+"Machinery really has had a great deal to do with changing the
+condition and activities of woman, and has been a powerful influence in
+bringing about the modern movement for women's suffrage. Machinery has
+changed the employment of women and forced them into kinds of work which
+are not domestic.
+
+"The typewriter and the telephone have revolutionized our methods of
+doing business. The typewriter and the telephone have filled our offices
+with women. They are doing work which twenty years ago would have been
+considered most unfeminine.
+
+"The war is strengthening this tendency of women to take up work that is
+not domestic. I have heard it said that women first got into the
+undomestic kinds of business in France during the Napoleonic wars.
+Napoleon wanted to have all the men out in the line of battle, so he had
+girls instructed in bookkeeping and other kinds of office work.
+
+"The business activities of Frenchwomen date from that time. And a
+similar result seems to be coming out of this war. In France, in
+England, in all the countries engaged in the war the women are filling
+the positions left vacant by the men."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that this is a good thing for civilization,
+this increased activity of women in business?"
+
+"I don't know," said Mr. Martin, musingly. "I don't know. But I do know
+this, that the main employment of woman is to rear a family. Office
+work, administrative work--these things are of only secondary
+importance. The one vital thing for women to do is to rear families.
+They must do this if the human race is to continue."
+
+"Mr. Martin," I said, "you told me that Thackeray, if he were alive,
+would satirize the reformers. Just what sort of reformer is it that has
+taken the place of the snob?"
+
+Mr. Martin did not at once answer. He smiled, as if enjoying some
+entertaining memory. Then he started to speak, and mentioned the name of
+a prominent reformer. But his New England caution checked him. He said:
+
+"No, I'd better not say anything about that. I'd rather not. I'd rather
+say that the things that the snobs admired and particularly embodied
+have lost prestige during the last twenty years.
+
+"After 1898, after our great rise to prosperity, the captains of
+industry and of finance were the great men of the country. But I think
+these great men are less stunning now than they were then. And money is
+less stunning, too.
+
+"All the business of money-making has had a great loss of prestige since
+1900. People think more of other things. And the people who are thinking
+of other things than money-making have more of a 'punch' than they had
+before. The wise have more of a punch, and so have the foolish."
+
+Again came that reminiscent smile. "Reformers can be very trying," he
+said. "Very trying, indeed. Did you ever read Brand Whitlock's _Forty
+Years of It_? Brand Whitlock had his own trials with the reformers.
+Whitlock is a sensible, generous man, and his attitude toward reformers
+is a good deal humorous and not at all violent. That would be
+Thackeray's attitude toward them, I think, if he were living to-day.
+He'd satirize the reformers instead of the snobs."
+
+Mr. Martin is not inclined to condemn or to accept absolutely any of the
+modern reform movements. "All reform movements," he said, "run until
+they get a check. Then they stop. But what they have accomplished is not
+lost."
+
+The society women who undertake sociological reform work find in Mr.
+Martin no unsympathetic critic.
+
+"These wealthy women," he said, "take up reform work as a recourse.
+Society life is not very filling. They have a sense of emptiness. So
+they go in for reform, to fill out their lives more adequately.
+
+"But I don't know that I'd call that kind of thing reform. I'd call it a
+large form of social activity. These women are attending to a great mass
+of people who need this attention. But the bulk of this kind of work is
+too small for it to be called reform.
+
+"In New York there are very many young people who need care and
+leadership. The neglected and incompetent must be looked after. The
+old-fashioned family control has been considerably loosened, and an
+attempt must be made to guard those who are therefore less protected
+than they would have been a generation ago. Certainly these efforts to
+look after young people who don't have enough care taken of them by
+their families are directed in the right direction."
+
+I asked Mr. Martin what he thought of the present condition of American
+literature, particularly the work presented to the public on the pages
+of magazines.
+
+"Just now," he said, "the newspapers seem to have almost everything. The
+great interest of the last few years has been in the newspapers. They
+have had a tremendous story to tell, they have told it every day, and
+other things have seemed, in comparison, flat and lifeless.
+
+"It has been a hard time for every sort of a publication not absolutely
+up to the minute all the time. The newspapers have had the field almost
+to themselves.
+
+"And I think that the newspapers have greatly improved. They have had an
+immense chance, and it has been very stimulating."
+
+
+
+
+_COMMERCIALIZING THE SEX INSTINCT_
+
+ROBERT HERRICK
+
+
+"Realism," said Robert Herrick, "is not the celebration of sexuality." I
+had not recalled to earth that merry divine whose lyric invitation to go
+a-Maying still echoes in the heart of every lover of poetry. The Robert
+Herrick with whom I was talking is a poet and a discriminating critic of
+poetry, but the world knows him chiefly for his novels--_The Common
+Lot_, _Together_, _Clark's Field_, and other intimate studies of
+American life and character. He is a realist, and not many years ago
+there were critics who thought that his manner of dealing with sexual
+themes was dangerously frank. Therefore, the statement that he had just
+made seemed to me particularly significant.
+
+"It seems to have become the fashion," he said, "to apply the term
+Realist to every writer who is obsessed with sex. I think I know the
+reason for this. Our Anglo-Saxon prudery kept all mention of sex
+relations out of our fiction for many years. Among comparatively modern
+novelists the realists were the first to break the shackles of this
+convention, and write frankly of sex. And from this it has come, most
+unfortunately, that realism and pornography are often confused by
+novelists and critics as well as by the public.
+
+"This confusion of ideas was apparent in some of the criticisms of my
+novel _Together_. In an early chapter of the book there was an incident
+which was intended to show that the man and woman who were the chief
+figures in the book were spiritually incompatible, that their relations
+as husband and wife would be wrong. This was, in fact, the theme of the
+book, and this incident in the first chapter was intended to foreshadow
+the later events of their married life. Well, the critics who disliked
+this chapter said that what they objected to was its 'gross realism.'
+
+"Now, as a matter of fact, that part of the book was not realistic at
+all. I was describing something unusual, abnormal, while realism has to
+do with the normal. The critic had, of course, a perfect right to
+believe that the subject ought not to be treated at all, but 'gross
+realism' was the most inappropriate description possible.
+
+"Undoubtedly there are many writers who believe that they are realists
+because they write about nothing but sex. Undoubtedly, too, there are
+many writers who are conscious of the commercial value of sex in
+literature. Of course a writer ought to be conscious of the sex impulse
+in life, but he ought not to display it constantly. I wish our writers
+would pay less attention to the direct manifestations of sex and more to
+its indirect influence, to the ways in which it affects all phases of
+activity."
+
+"Who are some of the writers who seem to you to be especially ready to
+avail themselves of the commercial value of sex?" I asked.
+
+Mr. Herrick smiled. "I think you know the writers I mean without my
+mentioning their names," he said. "They write for widely circulated
+magazines, and make a great deal of money, and their success is due
+almost entirely to their industrious celebration of sexual affairs. You
+know the sort of magazine for which they write--it always has on the
+cover a highly colored picture of a pretty woman, never anything else.
+That, too, is an example, and a rather wearying example, of the
+commercializing of the sex appeal.
+
+"I think that Zola, although he was a great artist, was often conscious
+of the business value of the sex theme. He knew that that sort of thing
+had a tremendous appeal, and, for me, much of his best work is marred by
+his deliberate introduction of sex, with the purpose--which, of course,
+he realized--of making a sensation and selling large editions of his
+books. This sort of commercialism was not found in the great Russian
+realists, the true realist--Dostoievski, for example. But it is found in
+the work of some of the modern Russian writers who are incorrectly
+termed realists."
+
+"Mr. Herrick," I asked, "just what is a realist?"
+
+Mr. Herrick's youthful face, which contrasts strangely with his white
+hair, took on a thoughtful expression.
+
+"The distinction between realism and romanticism," he said, "is one of
+spirit rather than of method. The realist has before him an aim which is
+entirely different from that of the romanticist.
+
+"The realist writes a novel with one purpose in view. And that purpose
+is to render into written words the normal aspect of things.
+
+"The aim of the romanticist is entirely different. He is concerned only
+with things which are exciting, astonishing--in a word, abnormal.
+
+"I do not like literary labels, and I think that the names 'realist' and
+'romanticist' have been so much misused that they are now almost
+meaningless. The significance of the term changes from year to year; the
+realists of one generation are the romanticists of the next.
+
+"Bulwer Lytton was considered a realist in his day. But we think of him
+only as a sentimental and melodramatic romanticist whose work has no
+connection with real life.
+
+"Charles Dickens was considered a realist by the critics of his own
+generation, and it is probable that he considered himself a realist. But
+his strongest instinct was toward the melodramatic. He wrote chiefly
+about simple people, it is true, and chiefly about his own land and
+time. But the fact that a writer used his contemporaries as subjects
+does not make him a realist. Dickens's people were unusual; they were
+better or worse than most people, and they had extraordinary adventures;
+they did not lead the sort of life which most people lead. Therefore,
+Dickens cannot accurately be called a realist."
+
+"You called Dostoievski a realist," I said. "What writers who use the
+English language seem to you to deserve best the name of realist?"
+
+"I think," said Mr. Herrick, "that the most thoroughgoing realist who
+ever wrote in England was Anthony Trollope. _Barchester Towers_ and
+_Framley Parsonage_ are masterpieces of realism; they give a faithful
+and convincing picture of the every-day life of a section of English
+society with which their author was thoroughly familiar. Trollope
+reflected life as he saw it--normal life. He was a great realist.
+
+"In the United States there has been only one writer who has as great a
+right to the name realist as had Anthony Trollope. That man is William
+Dean Howells. Mr. Howells has always been interested in the normal
+aspect of things. He has taken for his subject a sort of life which he
+knows intimately; he has not sought for extraordinary adventures for his
+theme, nor has he depicted characters remote from our experience. His
+novels are distinguished by such fidelity to life that he has an
+indisputable claim to be called a realist.
+
+"But, as I said, it is dangerous and unprofitable to attempt to label
+literary artists. Thackeray was a realist. Yet _Henry Esmond_ is classed
+as a romantic novel. In that book Thackeray used the realistic method;
+he spent a long time in studying the manners and customs of the time
+about which he was writing; and all the details of the sort of life
+which he describes are, I believe, historically accurate. And yet _Henry
+Esmond_ is a romance from beginning to end; it is a romantic novel
+written by a realist, and written according to what is called the
+realistic method.
+
+"On the other hand, Sir Walter Scott was a romanticist. No one will deny
+that. Yet in many of his early books he dealt with what may be called
+realistic material; he described with close fidelity to detail a sort of
+life and a sort of people with which he was well acquainted.
+
+"Whether a writer is a realist or a romanticist is, after all, I think,
+partly a matter of accident or culture. I happen to be a realist because
+I was brought up on the great Russian realists like Gogol and the great
+English realists from George Elliot down to Thomas Hardy. If I had been
+brought up on romantic writers I suppose that I might now be writing an
+entirely different sort of novel from that with which I am associated.
+
+"There is a sounder distinction," said Mr. Herrick, "than that which
+people try to draw between the realistic novel and the romantic novel.
+This is the distinction between the novel of character and the novel of
+events. Personally, I never have been able to see how the development of
+character can be separated from the plot of a novel. A book in which the
+characters exhibit exactly the same characteristics, moral and
+intellectual, in the last chapter as in the first, seems to me to be
+utterly worthless.
+
+"I will, however, make one exception--that is, the novel of the Jules
+Verne type. In this sort of book, and in romances of the Monte Cristo
+kind, action is the only thing with which the author and the reader are
+concerned, and any attempt to develop character would clog the wheels of
+the story.
+
+"But every other kind of novel depends on character. Even in the best
+work of Dumas, in _The Three Musketeers_, for example, the characters of
+the principal figures develop as the story progresses.
+
+"The highest interest of a novel depends upon the development of its
+characters. If the characters are static, then the book is feeble. I
+have never been able to see how the plot and the development of the
+characters can be separated.
+
+"Of course, the novel of character is full of adventure. The adventures
+of Henry James's characters are of absorbing interest, but they are
+psychological adventures, internal adventures. If some kind person
+wanted to give one of Henry James's novels what is commonly called 'a
+bully plot' the novel would fail."
+
+As to the probable effect on literature of the war, Mr. Herrick has a
+theory different from that of any other writer with whom I have
+discussed the subject.
+
+"I think," he said, "that after the war we shall return to fatuous
+romanticism and weak sentimentality in literature. The tendency will be
+to read novels in order to forget life, instead of reading them to
+realize life. There will be a revival of a deeper religious sense,
+perhaps, but there will also be a revival of mere empty formalism in
+religion. It has been so in the past after great convulsions. Men need
+time to recover their spiritual pride, their interest in ideas."
+
+But Mr. Herrick's own reaction to the war does not seem to justify his
+pessimistic prophecy. Certainly the personal experience which he next
+narrated to me does not indicate that Mr. Herrick is growing sentimental
+and romantic.
+
+"When I was in Rome recently," he said, "I was much impressed by
+D'Annunzio. I was interested in him as a problem, as a picturesque
+literary personality, as a decadent raffine type regenerated by the war.
+I have not read any of his books for many years.
+
+"I took some of D'Annunzio's books to read on my voyage home. I read _Il
+Piacere_. I realized its charm, I realized the highly æsthetic quality
+of its author, a scholarly and exact æstheticism as well as an emotional
+æstheticism. But, nevertheless, I had to force myself to read the book.
+It was simply a description of a young man's amorous adventures. And I
+could not see any reason for the existence of this carefully written
+record of passional experiences.
+
+"It seemed to me that the war had swept this sort of thing aside, or had
+swept aside my interest in this sort of thing. The book seemed to me as
+dull and trivial and as remote as a second-rate eighteenth-century
+novel. And I wondered if we would ever again return to the time when
+such a record of a young man's emotional and sensual experiences would
+be worth while.
+
+"I came to the conclusion that D'Annunzio himself would not now write
+such a novel. I think that it would seem to him to be too trivial a
+report on life. I think that the war has so forced the essential things
+of life upon the attention of young men."
+
+
+
+
+_SIXTEEN DON'TS FOR POETS_
+
+ARTHUR GUITERMAN
+
+
+Arthur Guiterman has been called the Owen Seaman of America. Of course
+he isn't, any more than Owen Seaman is the Arthur Guiterman of England.
+But the verse which brings Arthur Guiterman his daily bread is turned no
+less deftly than is that of _Punch's_ famous editor. Arthur Guiterman is
+not a humorist who writes verse; he is a poet with an abundant gift of
+humor.
+
+Now, the author of _The Antiseptic Baby and the Prophylactic Pup_ and
+_The Quest of the Riband_, and of those unforgetable rhymed reviews,
+differs from most other poets not only in possessing an abnormally
+developed sense of humor, but also in being able to make a comfortable
+living out of the sale of his verse. But when he talked to me recently
+he was by no means inclined to advise all able young poets to expect
+their poetry to provide them with board and lodging.
+
+"Of course it is possible to make a living out of verse," he said. "Walt
+Mason does, and so does Berton Braley. And now most of my income comes
+from my verse. Formerly I wrote short stories, but I haven't written one
+for seven or eight years.
+
+"Nevertheless, I think it is inadvisable for any one to set out with the
+idea of depending on the sale of verse as a means of livelihood. You
+see, there are, after all, two forms, and only two forms, of literary
+expression--the prose form and the verse form. Some subjects suit the
+prose form, others suit the verse form. Any one who makes writing his
+profession has ideas severally adapted to both of these forms. And every
+writer should be able to express his idea in whichever of these two
+forms suits it better.
+
+"Now, the verse form is older than the prose form. And so I have come to
+look upon it as the form peculiarly attractive to youth. Many writers
+outgrew the tendency to use the verse form, but some never outgrew it.
+Sir Walter Scott was a verse-writer before he was a prose-writer, and so
+was Shakespeare. So were many modern writers--Robert W. Chambers, for
+example.
+
+"This theory is true especially in regard to lyric verse. The lyric is
+nearly always the work of a young man. As a man grows older he sings
+less and preaches more. Certainly this was true of Milton.
+
+"I never thought that I should write verse for a living. But verse
+happens to be the medium that I love. I ran across my first poem the
+other day--it was about fireflies, and I was eight years old when I
+wrote it. Certainly nearly all writers write verse before they write
+prose; perhaps it is atavistic. I don't know that Henry James began with
+verse. But I would be willing to bet that he did.
+
+"One trouble with a great many people who make a living out of writing
+verse is that they feel obliged always to be verse-writers, never to
+write prose, even when the subject demands that medium. Alfred Noyes
+gives us an example of this unfortunate tendency in his _Drake_. I am
+not disparaging Alfred Noyes's work; he has written charming lyrics, but
+in _Drake_, and perhaps in some of the _Tales from the Mermaid Tavern_,
+I feel that he has written verse not because the subject was especially
+suited to that medium, but because he felt that he was a verse-writer
+and therefore should not write prose."
+
+Mr. Guiterman is firmly convinced, however, that a verse-writer ought to
+be able, in time, to make a living out of his work.
+
+"If a man calls himself a writer," he said, "he ought to be able to make
+a living out of writing. And I think that the writer of verse has a
+greater opportunity to-day than ever before. I don't mean to say that
+the appreciation of poetry is more intense than ever before, but it is
+more general. More people are reading poetry now than in bygone
+generations.
+
+"Compare with the traditions that we have to-day those of the early
+nineteenth century, of the time of Byron and Sir Walter Scott. Then
+books of verse sold in large quantities, it is true, but to a relatively
+small public, to one class of readers. Now not only the poet, but also
+the verse-writer has an enormous public. If a really great poet should
+arise to-day he would find awaiting him a larger public than that known
+by any poet of the past. But it would be necessary for the poet to be
+great for him to find this public. Byron would be more generally
+appreciated to-day, if he were to live again, than he was in his own
+generation. I mention Byron because I think it probable that the next
+great poet will have something of Byron's dynamic quality."
+
+"Who was the last great poet?" I asked.
+
+"How is one to decide whether or not a poet is great?" asked Mr.
+Guiterman in turn. "My own feeling is that the late William Vaughn Moody
+was a great poet in the making. Perhaps he never really fulfilled his
+early promise; perhaps he went back to the themes of bygone ages too
+much in finding themes for his poetry. It may be that the next really
+great poet will sing an entirely different strain; it may be that I will
+be one of those who will say that his work is all bosh.
+
+"But at any rate, he won't be an imitation Whitman or anything of that
+sort. He won't be any special school, nor will he think that he is
+founding a school. But it may be that his admirers will found a school
+with him as its leader, and they may force him to take himself
+seriously, and thus ruin himself."
+
+Returning to the subject of the advisability of a writer being able to
+express himself in verse as well as in prose, Mr. Guiterman said:
+
+"Especially in our generation is it true that good verse requires
+extreme condensation. In most work to-day brevity is desirable. The
+epigram beats the epic. If Milton were living to-day he would not write
+epics. I don't think it improbable that we have men with Miltonic minds,
+and they are not writing epics.
+
+"If a man finds that he cannot express his idea in verse more forcefully
+than he can in prose, then he ought to write prose. Very often a writer
+is interested in some little incident which he would not be justified in
+treating in prose, something too slight to be the theme of a short
+story. This is the sort of thing which he should put into verse. There
+is Leigh Hunt's _Jennie Kissed Me_, for example. Suppose he had made a
+short story of it."
+
+Thinking of this poet's financial success, I asked him just what course
+he would advise a young poet to pursue who had no means of livelihood
+except writing.
+
+"Well, the worst thing for him to do," said Mr. Guiterman, "would be to
+devote all his attention to writing an epic. He'd starve to death.
+
+"I suppose the best thing for him to do would be to write on as many
+subjects as possible, including those of intense interest to himself.
+What interests him intensely is sure to interest others, and the number
+of others whom it interests will depend on how close he is by nature to
+the mind of his place and time. He should get some sort of regular work
+so that he need not depend at first upon the sale of his writings. This
+work need not necessarily be literary in character, although it would be
+advisable for him to get employment in a magazine or newspaper office,
+so that he may get in touch with the conditions governing the sale of
+manuscripts.
+
+"He should write on themes suggested by the day's news. He should write
+topical verse; if there is a political campaign on, he should write
+verse bearing upon that; if a great catastrophe occurs, he should write
+about that, but he must not write on these subjects in a commonplace
+manner.
+
+"He should send his verses to the daily papers, for they are the
+publications most interested in topical verse. But also he should
+attempt to sell his work to the magazines, which pay better prices than
+the newspapers. If it is in him to do so, he should write humorous
+verse, for there is always a good market for humorous verse that is
+worth printing. He should look up the publishers of holiday cards, and
+submit to them Christmas, Thanksgiving, and Easter verses, for which he
+would receive, probably, about five dollars apiece. He should write
+advertising verses, and he should, perhaps, make an alliance with some
+artist with whom he can work, each supplementing the work of the other."
+
+"Mr. Guiterman," I said, "is this the advice that you would give to John
+Keats if he were to ask you?"
+
+"Yes, certainly," said Mr. Guiterman. "But you understand that our
+hypothetical poet must all the time be doing his own work, writing the
+sort of verse which he specially desires to write. If his pot-boiling is
+honestly done, it will help him with his other work.
+
+"He must study the needs and limitations of the various publications. He
+must recognize the fact that just because he has certain powers it does
+not follow that everything he writes will be desired by the editors.
+Marked ability and market ability are different propositions.
+
+"If he finds that the magazines are not printing sad sonnets, he must
+not write sad sonnets. He must adapt himself to the demands of the day.
+
+"There is high precedent for this course. You asked if I would give
+this advice to the young Keats. Why not, when Shakespeare himself
+followed the line of action of which I spoke? He began as a lyric poet,
+a writer of sonnets. He wrote plays because he saw that the demand was
+for plays, and because he wanted to make a living and more than a
+living. But because he was Shakespeare his plays are what they are.
+
+"The poet must be influenced by the demand. There is inspiration in the
+demand. Besides the material reward, the poet who is influenced by the
+demand has the encouraging, inspiring knowledge that he is writing
+something that people want to read."
+
+I asked Mr. Guiterman to give me a list of negative commandments for the
+guidance of aspiring poets. Here it is:
+
+"Don't think of yourself as a poet, and don't dress the part.
+
+"Don't classify yourself as a member of any special school or group.
+
+"Don't call your quarters a garret or a studio.
+
+"Don't frequent exclusively the company of writers.
+
+"Don't think of any class of work that you feel moved to do as either
+beneath you or above you.
+
+"Don't complain of lack of appreciation. (In the long run no really good
+published work can escape appreciation.)
+
+"Don't think you are entitled to any special rights, privileges, and
+immunities as a literary person, or have any more reason to consider
+your possible lack of fame a grievance against the world than has any
+shipping-clerk or traveling-salesman.
+
+"Don't speak of poetic license or believe that there is any such thing.
+
+"Don't tolerate in your own work any flaws in rhythm, rhyme, melody, or
+grammar.
+
+"Don't use 'e'er' for 'ever,' 'o'er' for 'over,' 'whenas' or 'what time'
+for 'when,' or any of the 'poetical' commonplaces of the past.
+
+"Don't say 'did go' for 'went,' even if you need an extra syllable.
+
+"Don't omit articles or prepositions for the sake of the rhythm.
+
+"Don't have your book published at your own expense by any house that
+makes a practice of publishing at the author's expense.
+
+"Don't write poems about unborn babies.
+
+"Don't--don't write hymns to the great god Pan. He is dead; let him rest
+in peace!
+
+"Don't write what everybody else is writing."
+
+
+
+
+_MAGAZINES CHEAPEN FICTION_
+
+GEORGE BARR McCUTCHEON
+
+
+Why is the modern American novel inferior to the modern English novel?
+Of course, there are some patriotic critics who believe that it is not
+inferior. But most readers of fiction speak of H. G. Wells and Compton
+Mackenzie, for example, with a respect and admiration which they do not
+extend to living American novelists.
+
+Why is this? Is it because of snobbishness or literary colonialism on
+the part of the American public? George Barr McCutcheon does not think
+so. The author of _Beverly of Graustark_ and many another popular
+romance believes that there is in America a force definitely harmful to
+the novel. And that force is the magazine.
+
+"The development of the magazine," he said to me, "has affected fiction
+in two ways. It has made it cheap and yet expensive, if you know what I
+mean.
+
+"Novels written solely with the view to sensationalism are more than
+likely to bring discredit, not upon the magazine, but upon the writer.
+He gets his price, however, and the public gets its fiction.
+
+"In my humble opinion, a writer should develop and complete his novel
+without a thought of its value or suitability to serial purposes. He
+should complete it to his own satisfaction--if that is possible--before
+submitting it to either editor or publisher. They should not be
+permitted to see it until it is in its complete form."
+
+"But you yourself write serial stories, do you not?" I asked.
+
+"I have never written a serial," answered Mr. McCutcheon. "Some of my
+stories have been published serially, but they were not written as
+serials.
+
+"I am quite convinced in my own mind that if we undertake to analyze the
+distinction between the first-class English writers of to-day and many
+of our Americans, we will find that their superiority resolves itself
+quite simply into the fact that they do not write their novels as
+serials. In other words, they write a novel and not a series of
+chapters, parts, and instalments."
+
+"Do you think that the American novel will always be inferior to the
+English novel?" I asked. "Is it not probable that the American novel
+will so develop as to escape the effects of serialization?"
+
+"There is no reason," Mr. McCutcheon replied, "why Americans should not
+produce novels equal to those of the English, provided the same care is
+exercised in the handling of their material, and that they make haste as
+slowly as possible. Just so long, however, as we are menaced by the
+perils of the serial our general output will remain inferior to that of
+England.
+
+"I do not mean to say that we have no writers in this country who are
+the equals in every respect of the best of the English novelists. We
+have some great men and women here, sincere, earnest workers who will
+not be spoiled."
+
+Mr. McCutcheon has no respect for the type of novel, increasingly
+popular of late, in which the author devotes page after page to glowing
+accounts of immorality with the avowed intention of teaching a high
+moral lesson. He has little faith in the honesty of purpose of the
+authors of works of this sort.
+
+"The so-called sex novel," he said, "is one of our gravest fatalities. I
+may be wrong, but I am inclined to think that most novels of that
+character are written, not from an æsthetic point of view, but for the
+somewhat laudable purpose of keeping the wolf from the door and at the
+same time allowing the head of the family to ride in an automobile of
+his own.
+
+"The typical serial writer is animated by the desire, or perhaps it is
+an obligation, to make the 'suspended interest' paramount to all else.
+This interest must not be allowed to flag between instalments.
+
+"The keen desire for thrills must be gratified at all costs. It is
+commanded by the editor--and I do not say that the editor errs. His
+public expects it in a serial. It must not be disappointed."
+
+I asked Mr. McCutcheon if he believed that a writer could produce
+sensational and poorly constructed fiction in order to make a living and
+yet keep his talent unimpaired; if a writer was justified in writing
+trash in order to gain leisure for serious work. He replied:
+
+"There are writers to-day who persist in turning out what they
+vaingloriously describe as 'stuff to meet the popular demand.' They
+invariably or inevitably declare that some day they will 'be in a
+position to write the sort of stuff they want to write.'
+
+"These writers say, in defense of their position, that they are not even
+trying to do their best work, that they are merely biding their time,
+and that--some day! I very much doubt their sincerity, or, at any rate,
+their capacity for self-analysis. I believe that when an author sets
+himself down to write a book (I refer to any author of recognized
+ability), he puts into that book the best that is in him at the time.
+
+"It is impossible for a good, conscientious writer to work on a plane
+lower than his best. Only hack writers can do such things.
+
+"There is not one of us who does not do his best when he undertakes to
+write his book. We only confess that we have not done our best when a
+critic accuses us of pot-boiling, and so forth. Then we rise in our
+pride and say, 'Oh, well, I can do better work than this, and they know
+it.'
+
+"It is true that we may not be doing the thing that we really want to
+do, but I am convinced that we are unconsciously doing our best, just
+the same. It all resolves itself into this statement--a good workman
+cannot deliberately do a poor piece of work.
+
+"I am free to confess that I have done my very best in everything I have
+undertaken. It may fall short of excellence as viewed from even my own
+viewpoint, but it is the best I know how to do.
+
+"So you may take it from me that the writer who declares that he is
+going to do something really worth while, just as soon as he gets
+through doing the thing that the public expects him to do, is deceiving
+himself and no one else. An author cannot stand still in his work. He
+either progresses or retrogrades, and no man progresses except by means
+of steady improvement. He cannot say, 'I will write a poor book this
+year and a great book next year.'"
+
+Mr. McCutcheon is so unashamedly a romanticist that I expected to find
+him an enthusiastic partisan of the first and greatest master of the
+romantic novel in English. But, to my surprise, he said:
+
+"I suppose the world has outgrown Sir Walter Scott's novels. It is quite
+natural that it should. The world is older and conditions have changed.
+The fairest simile I can offer in explanation is that as man himself
+grows older he loses, except in a too frequently elastic memory, his
+interest in the things that moved him when he was a boy."
+
+But while Mr. McCutcheon believes (in defiance of the opinion of the
+publishers who continue to bring out, year by year, their countless new
+editions of the Waverley Novels in all the languages of the civilized
+world) that the spell of the Wizard of the North has waned, he
+nevertheless believes that the romantic novel has lost none of its
+ancient appeal.
+
+"I do not believe," he said, "that the vogue of the romantic novel, or
+tale (which is a better word for describing the sort of fiction covered
+by this generic term), will ever die. The present war undoubtedly will
+alter the trend of the modern romantic fiction, but it will not in
+effect destroy it."
+
+"How will it alter it?" I asked.
+
+"Years most certainly will go by," he replied, "before the novelist may
+even hope to contend with the realities of this great and most
+unromantic conflict. Kings and courtiers are very ordinary, and, in some
+cases, ignoble creatures in these days, and none of them appears to be
+romantic.
+
+"We find a good many villains among our erstwhile heroes, and a good
+many heroes among our principal villains. People will not care to read
+war novels for a good many years to come, but it is inevitable that
+future generations will read even the lightest kind of fiction dealing
+with this war, horrible though it is. Just so long as the world exists
+there will be people who read nothing else but the red-blood, stirring
+romantic stories.
+
+"There exists, of course, a class of readers who will not be tempted by
+the romantic, who will not even tolerate it, because they cannot
+understand it. That class may increase, but so will its antithesis.
+
+"I know a man who has read the Bible through five or six times, not
+because he is of a religious turn of mind or even mildly devout, but
+because there is a lot of good, sound, exciting romance in it! A man who
+is without romance in his soul has no right to beget children, for he
+cannot love them as they ought to be loved. They represent romance at
+its best. He is, therefore, purely selfish in his possession of them."
+
+Mr. McCutcheon had spoken of the probable effect of the war on the
+popular taste for romantic fiction. I reminded him of William Dean
+Howells's much-quoted statement, "War stops literature."
+
+"War stops everything else," said Mr. McCutcheon, "so why not
+literature? It stops everything, I amend, except bloodshed, horror, and
+heartache.
+
+"And when the war itself is stopped, you will find that literature will
+be revived with farming and other innocent and productive industries. I
+venture to say that some of the greatest literature the world has ever
+known is being written to-day. Out of the history of this titanic
+struggle will come the most profound literary expressions of all time,
+and from men who to-day are unknown and unconsidered."
+
+I asked Mr. McCutcheon if he did not believe that the youthful energy of
+the United States was likely to make its citizens impatient of romance,
+that quality being generally considered the exclusive property of
+nations ancient in civilization. He did not think so.
+
+"America," he said, "is essentially a romantic country, our great and
+profound commercialism to the contrary notwithstanding. America was born
+of adventure; its infancy was cradled in romance; it has grown up in
+thrills. And while to-day it may not reflect romance as we are prone to
+consider it, there still rests in America a wonderful treasure in the
+shape of undeveloped possibilities.
+
+"We are, first of all, an eager, zestful, imaginative people. We are
+creatures of romance. We do two things exceedingly well--we dream and
+we perform.
+
+"Our dreams are of adventure, of risk, of chance, of impossibilities,
+and of deeds that only the bold may conceive. And we find on waking from
+these dreams that we have performed the deeds we dreamed of.
+
+"The Old World looks upon us as braggarts. Perhaps we are, but we are
+kindly, genial, smiling braggarts--and the braggart is, after all, our
+truest romanticist.
+
+"I like to hear a grown man admit that he still believes in fairies.
+That sort of man thinks of the things that are beautiful, even though
+they are invisible. And--if you stop to think about it--the most
+beautiful things in the world are invisible."
+
+
+
+
+_BUSINESS INCOMPATIBLE WITH ART_
+
+FRANK H. SPEARMAN
+
+
+The late J. Pierpont Morgan writing sonnet sequences, Rockefeller
+regarding oil as useful only when mixed with pigment and spread upon
+canvas by his own deft hand, Carnegie designing libraries instead of
+paying for them--these are some of the entertaining visions that occur
+to the mind of Frank H. Spearman when he contemplates in fancy a
+civilization in which business no longer draws the master minds away
+from art.
+
+I asked the author of _Nan of Music Mountain_ if he thought that the
+trend of present-day American life--its commercialism and
+materialism--affected the character of our literature. He replied:
+
+"Let us take commercialism first: By it you mean the pursuit of
+business. Success in business brings money, power, and that public
+esteem we may loosely term fame--the admiration of our fellow-men and
+the sense of power among them.
+
+"Commercialism, thus defined, affects the character of our literature in
+a way that none of our students of the subject seems to have
+apprehended. We live in an atmosphere of material striving. Our great
+rewards are material successes. The extremely important consequence is
+that our business life through its greater temptations--through its
+being able to offer the rewards of wealth and mastery and esteem--robs
+literature and the kindred arts of our keenest minds. We have, it is
+true, eminent doctors and lawyers, but the complaint that commercialism
+has invaded these professions only proves that they depend directly on
+business prosperity for a substantial portion of their own rewards.
+
+"I am not forgetting the crust and garret as the traditional setting for
+the literary genius; but, when this state of affairs existed, the genius
+had no chance to become a business millionaire within ten years--or, for
+that matter, within a hundred. And while poverty provides an excellent
+foundation for a career, it is not so good as a superstructure--at
+least, not outside the ranks of the heroic few who renounce riches for
+spiritual things.
+
+"More than once," continued Mr. Spearman, "in meeting men among our
+masters of industry, I have been struck by the thought that these are
+the men who should be writing great books, painting great pictures, and
+building great cathedrals; their tastes, I have sometimes found, run in
+these directions quite as strongly as the tastes of lesser men who give
+themselves to literature, painting, or architecture. But the present-day
+market for cathedrals is somewhat straitened, and a great ambition may
+nowadays easily neglect the prospective rewards of literature for those
+of steel-making.
+
+"Business success--not achieved in literature and the arts--comes first
+with us; in consequence, the ranks of those who follow these professions
+are robbed of the intellect that should contribute to them. This is the
+real way in which commercialism--our pursuit of business--affects our
+literature. It depletes, too, in the same way, the quality of men in our
+public life.
+
+"Charles G. Dawes has called my attention more than once to the falling
+off in caliber among men from whose ranks our politicians and public men
+are drawn. It is not that our present administration is so conspicuously
+weak; go to any of the Presidential conventions this year and note the
+falling off in quality among the politicians. In one generation the
+change has been startling. The sons of the men that loomed large in
+public life twenty-five years ago to-day are masters of business.
+
+"Business takes everything. We have had really magnificent financiers,
+such as the elder Morgan, who should be our Michael Angelo. I have known
+railroad executives who might have been distinguished novelists, and
+bankers who would have been great artists were the American people as
+obsessed with the painting of pictures and the making of statues as
+those of Europe once were.
+
+"In Michael Angelo's day public interest in solving problems in
+manufacture and transportation did not overshadow that in painting and
+sculpture. Leonardo in our day would be building railroads, digging
+canals, or inventing the aeroplane--and doing better, perhaps, at these
+things than any man living; he came perilously close to doing all of
+them in his own day.
+
+"Before you can bring our steel-founders and business men into
+literature you must make success in literature and its kindred arts
+esteemed as the greatest reward. As it is, I fear it is likely to be
+chiefly those who through lack of capacity, inclination, or robust
+health are unequal to the heat and burden of great business that will be
+left for the secondary callings, among which we must at present rank
+literature. It would be interesting, too, to consider to what extent
+this movement of men toward business rewards has been compensated for by
+the opportunities afforded to women in the field thus deserted; we
+certainly have many clever women cultivating it."
+
+"But what," I asked, "about materialism--not specifically commercialism,
+but materialism? Do you think that its evil effects are evident in
+contemporary literature?"
+
+"Materialism--you mean the philosophy--has quite a different effect on
+any literature--a poisonous, a baneful effect, rather than a merely
+harmful one," Mr. Spearman answered. "Can you possibly have, at any time
+or anywhere, great art without a great faith? Since the era of
+Christianity, at any rate, it seems to me that periods of faith, or at
+least periods enjoying the reflexes and echoes of faith, have afforded
+the really nourishing atmosphere for artistic development. Spirituality
+provides that which the imagination may seize upon for the substance of
+its creative effort; without spirituality the imagination shrivels, and
+the materialist, while losing none of his characteristic confidence,
+shrinks continually to punier artistic stature."
+
+Something in what Mr. Spearman had said reminded me of Henry Holt's
+criticisms of the modern magazines. So I asked Mr. Spearman what effect
+the development of the American magazine, with its high prices for
+serials and series of stories, had had upon our fiction. He answered:
+
+"Good, I think. Our fiction must compete in its rewards with those of
+business. One of the rewards of either--even if you put it, in the first
+case, the lowest--is the monetary reward, and the more substantial that
+can be made, the more chance fiction will have of holding up its head.
+
+"I have had occasion to watch pretty closely the development of the
+inclinations and ambitions of a number of average American boys--boys
+that have had fairly intimate opportunities to consider both literature
+and business. I have been startled more than once to find that as each
+of them came along and was asked what he wanted to do, the substance of
+his answer has been, 'Something to make money.'
+
+"If you question your own youthful acquaintances, you will receive in
+most cases, I dare say, similar answers. I am afraid if Giotto had been
+a Wyoming shepherd-boy he would want to be a steel-maker. Anything that
+tends to attract the young to the pursuit of literature as a calling
+strengthens our fiction, and the magazine should have credit for an
+'assist' in this direction. Don't forget, of course, that the magazine
+itself derives directly, by way of advertising, from business."
+
+"Do you think, then," I asked, "that our writers are producing work as
+likely to endure as that which is being produced in England?"
+
+Mr. Spearman smiled whimsically. "Your question suggests to me," he
+replied, "rather than any judgment in the case, the reflection that the
+average English writer has possessed over our average American writer
+the very great advantage of an opportunity to become really educated; to
+this extent their equipment is appreciably stronger than ours. If you
+will read the ordinary run of English fiction or play-writing and
+compare it with similar work of ours, you cannot fail to note the better
+finish in their work. And in expressing a conviction that our writers
+are somewhat handicapped as to this factor in their equipment, I do not
+indict them for wasted opportunities; I indict our own substantial
+failure in educational methods. For a generation or more we have
+experimented, and from the very first grade in our grammar-schools up to
+the university courses there have resulted confusion and ineptitude. I
+instance specifically our experimentation with electives and our
+widespread contempt for the classics. To attempt to master any of the
+arts and not to be intimately familiar with what the Greeks and the
+Romans have left us of their achievement--not to speak of those, to us,
+uncharted seas of medieval achievement in every direction following the
+twelfth century--is to make the effort under a distinct disadvantage.
+
+"The average English writer has had much more of this intimacy, or at
+least a chance at much more of it, than the average American writer. In
+the sphere of literary criticism I have heard Mr. Brownell speak of the
+better quality of even the anonymous English literary criticism so
+frequently to be found in their journals when compared with similar
+American work. There is only one explanation for these things, and it
+lies in the training. All of this not implying, in indirect answer to
+your question, that the English writer is to bear away the prize in the
+competition for literary permanence. American Samsons may, despite
+everything, burst their bonds; but if they win it will often be without
+what their teachers should have supplied.
+
+"Mr. Brownell, in his definitive essay on Cooper, in comparing the
+material at Balzac's hand with that at Cooper's, remarks on the fact
+that Cooper's background was essentially nature. 'Nothing, it is true,
+is more romantic than nature,' adds Mr. Brownell, 'except nature plus
+man. But the exception is prodigious.' Europe measures behind her
+writers almost three thousand years of man.
+
+"We have in this country no atmosphere of Christian tradition such as
+that which pervades Europe--English-speaking people parted with historic
+Christianity before they came here. But, willingly or unwillingly, the
+English and the Continental writers are saturated with this magnificent
+background of Christianity--they can't escape it. And what I note as
+striking evidence of the value to them of this brooding spirit of twenty
+European centuries is the fact that their very pagans choose Christian
+material to work with. Goethe himself, fine old pagan that he was,
+turned to Christian quarries for his _Faust_. The minor pagans turn in
+likewise, though naturally with slighter results. But to all of them,
+Christianity, paraphrasing Samson, might well say: 'If ye had not plowed
+with my heifer, ye had not read--your own riddle of longed-for
+recognition.'"
+
+"Why is it that the art of fiction is no longer taken as seriously as it
+was, for example, in the time of Sir Walter Scott?"
+
+"I don't know how seriously," countered Mr. Spearman, "you mean your
+question to be taken. It suggests that in the day of Walter Scott the
+field of novel-writing was still so new that only bolder spirits
+ventured into it. It was not a day when the many could attempt the novel
+with any assurances of success in marketing their wares. In consequence
+we got then the work of only big men and women. Pioneers--though not
+necessarily respectable--are a hardy lot.
+
+"Still--touching on your other question about the great American
+novel--if I wished to develop great musicians I should start every one
+possible at studying music, and I can't help thinking that the more
+there are among us who attempt novels the greater probability there will
+be for the production of a masterpiece. A man's mind is a mine. Neither
+he nor any one else knows what is in it. Possessing the property in fee
+simple, he has, of course, certain valuable proprietary rights. But the
+only way I know of to find out to a certainty just what lies within the
+property is persistently to tunnel and drift, or, as Mr. Brownell says,
+'to get out what is in you.' And I am in complete accord with him in the
+belief that temperament is the best possible endowment for a
+novelist--and temperament comes, if you are a Christian, from God; if a
+pagan, from the gods."
+
+Mr. Spearman returned to his theme of the effect of materialism on
+literature in the course of a discussion of the French novel of the day
+as compared to the novel of Zola and his imitators. He said:
+
+"I think the important thing for Zola was that his day coincided with a
+materialistic ascendency in the thought of France. He lived at a time
+admirably suited to a man of his type. Zola found a France weak and
+contemptible in its government, and in consequence a soil in which
+grossness could profitably be cultivated.
+
+"He was by no means a great artist; he was merely a writer writhing for
+recognition when he turned to filth. He took it up to commercialize it,
+to turn it into money and reputation. Men such as he are continually, at
+different times and in different countries, lifting their heads. But
+unless they are sustained by what chances to be a loose public attitude
+on questions of decency, they are clubbed into silence.
+
+"And just why should the exploitation of filth assume to monopolize the
+word 'realism'? To define precisely what realism should include and
+exclude would call for hard thinking. But it doesn't take much thought
+to reach the conclusion that mere annalists of grossness have no proper
+monopoly of the term. Grossness is no adequate foundation for a literary
+monument; it is not even a satisfactory corner-stone. The few writers
+one thinks of that constitute exceptions would have left a better
+monument without it.
+
+"But if you wish to realize how fortunate Zola was in coinciding with a
+period when the chief effort of the ruling spirits of France was to war
+on all forces that strove to conserve decency, try to imagine what sort
+of a reception _L'Assommoir_ would be accorded to-day by the tears of
+France stricken through calamity to its knees.
+
+"France is experiencing now realism of quite another sort from that
+propagated by Zola--a realism that is wringing the souls and turning
+the thoughts of a great and unhappy people back once more to the eternal
+verities; in these grossness never had a place.
+
+"And if you don't want to think in grossness, don't read in it; if you
+don't want to act in grossness, don't think in it. To exploit it is to
+exaggerate its proper significance in the affairs of life.
+
+"Twenty-five years ago an American writer set out as a Zola disciple to
+give us something American along Zola's lines. He made a failure of
+it--so complete that he was forced to complain that later efforts in
+which he returned to paths of decency were refused by editors and
+publishers. He had spoiled his name as an asset. If you are curious to
+note how far the bars have been let down in his direction in twenty-five
+years, contemplate what passes to-day among us with quite a footing of
+magazine and book popularity. It means simply that we are falling into
+those conditions of public indifference in which moral parasites may
+flourish. But if one were forced to-day to choose in France between the
+material taken up by Zola after his failure to cultivate successfully
+cleaner fields, and that chosen by Réné Bazin and the new and hopeful
+French school of spirituality, there could be no question that the
+latter would afford the better opportunity. And there can be no real
+question but that the exponents of grossness are likewise opportunists,
+looking first of all for a market for their names--as most men are
+doing. But some men, by reason of inclination or voluntary restraint,
+have restricted themselves in their choice of literary materials."
+
+Mr. Spearman has recently given much of his time to moving-picture work,
+with the result that his name is nearly as familiar to the devotees of
+the flickering screen as to habitual magazine readers. I asked him how
+the development of the moving picture is likely to affect literature. He
+replied:
+
+"What I can say on this point will perhaps be more directly of interest
+to writers themselves; the development of the moving picture broadens
+their market. It has, if you will let me put it in this way, increased
+the number of our theaters in their capacity for absorbing material for
+the drama a thousandfold. Inevitably a new industry developing with such
+amazing rapidity is still in the experimental stages, and those who know
+it best say its possibilities are but just beginning. What I note of
+interest to the literary worker is that men advanced and in authority
+in the production of pictures have reached this conclusion: Behind every
+good picture there must be a good story. The slogan to-day is 'The story
+is the thing.' And those close to the 'inside' of the industry say
+to-day to the fictionist: 'Hold on to your stories. Within a year or two
+they will command from the movies much higher prices than to-day,
+because the supply is fast becoming exhausted.'"
+
+It was in the course of his remarks about the rewards of literature that
+Mr. Spearman told an interesting story concerning Henry James and George
+du Maurier. He said:
+
+"The recent death of Henry James is bringing out many anecdotes
+concerning him. At the time of George du Maurier's death it was recalled
+that he had once given the material for _Trilby_ to Henry James with
+permission to use it; and the story ran that, resolving to use it
+himself, Mr. James returned the material to Du Maurier, who wrote the
+novel from it.
+
+"But I don't think it has ever appeared that the real reason why Henry
+James did not attempt _Trilby_ was that he possessed no musical sense;
+Mr. James himself told me this, and without a sense of music the
+material was useless to any one. I discussed the incident with him some
+ten years ago and he added, in connection with _Trilby_ and Du Maurier,
+other interesting facts.
+
+"_Trilby_ did not at first make a signal success in England. Its first
+big hit was made in _Harper's Magazine_. Not realizing the American
+possibilities, Mr. du Maurier, when offered by Harper & Brothers a
+choice between royalties and five thousand dollars outright for the book
+rights, took the lump sum as if it were descended straight from heaven.
+When the news of the extraordinary success of the book in this country
+reached him, he realized his serious mistake, and in the family circle
+there was keen depression over it. But further surprises were in store
+for him. To their eternal credit, the house of Harper &
+Brothers--honorable then as now--in view of the unfortunate situation in
+which their author had placed himself, voluntarily canceled the first
+contract and restored Du Maurier to a royalty basis. The fear in the
+English home then was that this arrangement would come too late to bring
+in anything. Not only, however, did the book continue to sell, but the
+play came on, and together the rights afforded George du Maurier a
+competency that banished further worry from the home."
+
+
+
+
+_THE NOVEL MUST GO_
+
+WILL N. HARBEN
+
+
+The novel is doomed. If the automobile, the aeroplane, and the moving
+picture continue to develop during the next ten years as they have
+developed during the last ten, people will cease almost entirely to take
+interest in fiction.
+
+It was not Henry Ford who told me this. Neither was it Mr. Wright, nor
+M. Pathé. The man who made this ominous prophecy about the novel is
+himself a successful novelist. He is Will N. Harben, author of _Pole
+Baker_, _Ann Boyd_, _The Desired Woman_, and many other widely read
+tales of life in rural Georgia.
+
+Although he is so closely associated with the Southern scenes about
+which he has written, Mr. Harben spends most of his time in New York
+nowadays. He justifies this course interestingly--but before I tell his
+views on this subject I will repeat what he had to say about this
+possible extinction of the novel.
+
+"You have read," he said, "of the tremendous vogue of _Pickwick Papers_
+when it was first published. No work of fiction since that time has been
+received with such enthusiasm.
+
+"In London at that time you would find statuettes of Pickwick, Mr.
+Winkle, and Sam Weller in the shop windows. There were Pickwick
+punch-ladles, Pickwick teaspoons, Pickwick souvenirs of all sorts.
+
+"Now, when you walk down Broadway, do you find any reminders of the
+popular novels of the day? You do not, except of course in the
+bookshops. But you do find things that remind you of contemporary taste.
+In the windows of stationers and druggists you find statuettes not of
+characters in the fiction of the day, but of Charlie Chaplin.
+
+"Of course the moving picture has not supplanted the novel. But people
+all over the country are becoming less and less interested in fiction.
+The time which many people formerly gave to the latest novel they now
+give to the latest film.
+
+"And the moving picture is by no means the only thing which is weaning
+us away from the novel. The automobile is a powerful influence in this
+direction.
+
+"Take, for instance, the town from which I come--Dalton, Georgia. There
+the people who used to read novels spend their time which they used to
+give to that entertainment riding around in automobiles. Sometimes they
+go on long trips, sometimes they go to visit their friends in near-by
+towns. But automobiling is the way in which they nowadays are accustomed
+to spend their leisure.
+
+"Naturally, this has its effect on their attitude toward novels. Years
+ago, when Dalton had a population of about three thousand, it had two
+well-patronized bookshops. Now it has a population of about seven
+thousand and no bookshops at all!
+
+"I suppose one of the reasons is that people live their adventures by
+means of the automobile, and therefore do not care so much about getting
+adventures from the printed page. But the chief reason is one of
+time--the fact is that people more and more prefer automobiling to
+reading.
+
+"Now, if the aeroplane were to be perfected--as we have every reason to
+believe it will be--so that we could travel in it as we now do in the
+automobile, what possible interest would we have in reading dry novels?
+It seems likely that in a hundred years we will be able to see clearly
+the surface of Mars--do you think that people will want to read novels
+when this wonderful new world is before their eyes?
+
+"The authors themselves are beginning to realize this. They are becoming
+more and more nervous. They are not the placid creatures that they were
+in Sir Walter Scott's day. They feel that people are not as interested
+in them and their works as they used to be. I doubt very much if any
+publisher to-day would be interested, for example, in an author who
+produced a novel as long as _David Copperfield_ and of the same
+excellence."
+
+"But do you think," I asked, "that the fault is entirely that of the
+public? Haven't the authors changed, too?"
+
+"I think that the authors have changed," said Mr. Harben, reflectively.
+"The authors do not live as they used to live.
+
+"The authors no longer live with the people about whom they write.
+Instead, they live with other authors.
+
+"Nowadays, an author achieves success by writing, we will say, about
+the people of his home in the Far West. Then he comes to New York. And
+instead of living with the sort of people about whom he writes, he lives
+with artists. That must have its effect upon his work."
+
+"But is not that what you yourself did?" I asked. "A New York
+apartment-house is certainly the last place in the world in which to
+look for the historian of _Pole Baker_!"
+
+Mr. Harben smiled. "But I don't live with artists," he said. "I try to
+live with the kind of people I write about. I resolved a long time ago
+to try to avoid living with literary people and to live with all sorts
+of human beings--with people who didn't know or care whether or not I
+was a writer.
+
+"So I have for my friends and acquaintances sailors, merchants--people
+of all sorts of professions and trade. And people of that sort--people
+who make no pretensions to be artists--are the best company for a
+writer, for they open their hearts to him. A writer can learn how to
+write about humanity by living with humanity, instead of with other
+people who are trying to write about humanity."
+
+"But at any rate you have left the part of the country about which you
+write," I said. "And wasn't that one of the things for which you
+condemned our hypothetical writer of Western tales?"
+
+"Not necessarily," said Mr. Harben. "It sometimes happens that an author
+can write about the scenes he knows best only after he has gone away
+from them. I know that this is true of myself.
+
+"It's in line with the old saws about 'distance lends enchantment' and
+'emotion remembered in tranquillity,' you know. I believe that Du
+Maurier was able to write his vivid descriptions of life in the Latin
+Quarter of Paris because he went to London to do it.
+
+"You see, I absorbed life in Georgia for many years. And in New York I
+can remember it and get a perspective on it and write about it."
+
+"Then," I said, "you would go to Georgia, I suppose, if you wanted to
+write a story about life in a New York apartment?"
+
+Mr. Harben thought for a moment. "No," he said, slowly, "I don't think
+that I'd go to Georgia to write about New York. I think that a novel
+about New York must be written in New York--while a novel about Dalton,
+Georgia, must be written away from Dalton, Georgia."
+
+"How do you account for that?" I asked.
+
+"Well," said Mr. Harben, "for one thing there is something bracing about
+New York's atmosphere that makes it easier to write when one is here.
+Once I tried to write a novel in Dalton, and I simply couldn't do it.
+
+"And the reason why a novel about New York must be written in New York
+is because you can't absorb New York as you might absorb Georgia, so to
+speak, and then go away and express it. New York is so thoroughly
+artificial that there is nothing about it which a writer can absorb.
+
+"New York hasn't the puzzles and adventures and surprises that Georgia
+has. Everybody knows about apartment-houses and skyscrapers and subways
+and elevators and dumb-waiters--there's nothing new to say about them.
+
+"I sometimes think that the reason why the modern novel about New York
+City is so uninteresting is because everybody tries to write about New
+York City. And their novels are all of one pattern--necessarily, because
+life in New York City is all of one pattern.
+
+"In bygone days this was not true of New York. For instance, Mr.
+Howells's novels about New York City were about a community in which
+people lived in real houses and had families and friends. In those days
+life in New York had its problems and surprises and adventures; it was
+not lived mechanically and according to a set pattern.
+
+"What I have said about the advisability of an author's leaving the
+scenes about which he is to write is not universally true. There are
+writers who do better work by staying in the place where the scenes of
+their stories are laid. For instance, Joel Chandler Harris did better
+work by staying in the South than he would have done if he had gone
+away."
+
+"But wasn't that because his negro folk-tales were a sort of 'glorified
+reporting' rather than creative work?" I asked.
+
+"No," said Mr. Harben; "they were creative work. Joel Chandler Harris
+remembered just the bare skeleton of the stories as the negro had told
+them to him. And he developed them imaginatively. That was creative
+work. And he did most of his writing, and the best of his writing, in
+the office of _The Constitution_."
+
+"In view of what you said about the difficulty of absorbing New York
+life," I suggested, "I suppose that, in your opinion, the great American
+novel will not be written about New York."
+
+"What do you mean by the great American novel?" asked Mr. Harben. "So
+far as I know there is no great English novel or great Russian novel."
+
+"I suppose that the term means a novel inevitably associated with the
+national literature," I said. "You cannot think of English literature
+without thinking of _Vanity Fair_, for instance. Certainly there is no
+American novel so conspicuously a reflection of our national life as
+that novel is of English life."
+
+"Well," said Mr. Harben, "it is difficult to think of American
+literature or of American life without thinking of the novels of William
+Dean Howells. But the great American novel, to use that term, would be
+less likely to come into being than the great English novel.
+
+"You see, the United States is not as compact as England. London, it may
+be said, is England; it has all the characteristics of England, and in
+the season all England may be met there."
+
+Mr. Harben is not in sympathy with the theories of some of our modern
+realists.
+
+"The trouble with the average realist," he said, "is that he doesn't
+believe that the emotions are real. As a matter of fact, the greatest
+source of material for the novelist is to be found in the emotional and
+spiritual side of human nature. If writers were more receptive to
+spiritual and emotional impressions they would make better novels. It is
+the soul of man that the greatest novels are written about--there is
+Dostoievski's _Crime and Punishment_, for example!"
+
+In spite of his criticisms of some of the methods of the modern
+realists, Mr. Harben believes strongly in the importance of one
+realistic dogma, that which has to do with detailed description.
+
+"Why is it that _Pepys's Diary_ is interesting to us?" he asked. "It is
+because of its detail.
+
+"But if Pepys had been a Howells--if he had been as careful in
+describing great things as he was in describing small things--then his
+_Diary_ would be ten times more valuable to us than it is. And so
+Howells's novels will be valuable to people who read them a thousand
+years from now to get an idea of how we live.
+
+"That is, Howells's novels will be valuable if people read novels in the
+years that are to come! Perhaps they will not be reading novels or
+anything else. For all we know, thought-transference may become as
+common a thing as telephony is now. And if this comes to pass nobody
+will read!"
+
+
+
+
+_LITERATURE IN THE COLLEGES_
+
+JOHN ERSKINE
+
+
+Brown of Harvard is no more. The play of that name may still be running,
+but of Harvard life it is now about as accurate a picture as _Trelawney
+of the Wells_ is of modern English life. At Harvard, and at all the
+great American universities, the dashing, picturesque young athlete is
+no longer the prevailing type of the undergraduate ideal.
+
+Of course, undergraduate athletics and undergraduate athletes
+persist--it would be a tragedy if they did not--but the type of youth
+that has been rather effectively denominated the "rah-rah boy" is
+increasingly difficult to find. His place has been taken, not by the
+"grind," the plodding, prematurely old student, caring only for his
+books and his scholastic record, but by a normal young man, aware that
+the campus is not the most important place in the world; aware, in
+fact, that the university is not the universe.
+
+This young man knows about class politics, but also about international
+politics; about baseball, but also about contemporary literature. He is
+much more a citizen than his predecessor of ten years since, less
+provincial, less aristocratic. And he not only enjoys literature, but
+actually desires to create it.
+
+The chief enthusiasm at Harvard seems to be the drama; indeed, the Brown
+of Harvard to-day must be represented not as a crimson-sweatered
+gladiator but as a cross between Strindberg and George M. Cohan. At
+Columbia--I have Prof. John Erskine's word for it--there has lately
+developed a genuine interest in--what do you suppose? Poetry!
+
+I interviewed the bulletin-board outside Hamilton Hall before I
+interviewed Professor Erskine, and it, too, surprised me. It was not the
+bulletin-board of my not altogether remote undergraduate days. It bore
+notices telling of a meeting of the "Forum for Religious Discussion," of
+an anti-militaristic mass-meeting, of a rehearsal of an Elizabethan
+drama. It was a sign of the times.
+
+Professor Erskine said that undergraduate ideals had greatly changed
+during the last few years. I asked him how this had come to pass.
+
+"Well," he replied, "I think that college life reflects the ordinary
+life of the world more closely than is usually believed. This is a day
+of general cultural and spiritual awakening. The college student is
+waking, just as everybody else is waking; like everybody else, he is
+becoming more interested in the great things of life. There is no reason
+why the college walls should shut him in from the hopes, ambitions, and
+problems of the rest of humanity.
+
+"It isn't only the boys that have changed--the parents have changed too.
+Time was when the father and mother wanted their son to go to college so
+that he could join a group of pleasant, nice-mannered boys of good
+family. Now they have a definite idea of the practical value of a
+college education, they send their son to college intelligently.
+
+"Also, the whole theory of teaching has changed. The purely Germanic
+system has been superseded by something more humane. The old idea of
+scholarship for its own sake is no longer insisted upon. Instead, the
+subjects taught are treated in their relation to life, the only way in
+which they can be of real interest to the students.
+
+"You will look in vain in the modern university for the old type of
+absent-minded, dry-as-dust professor. He has been superseded by the
+professor who is a man as well as a scholar. And naturally he approaches
+his subject and his classes in a different spirit from that of his
+predecessor.
+
+"We have a new sort of teacher of English. He is not now (as was once
+often the case) a retired clergyman, or a specialist recruited from some
+unliterary field. He is, in many cases, a creative artist, a dramatist,
+a novelist, or a poet.
+
+"When I was in college this was not generally true. Then such a
+professor as George Edward Woodberry or Brander Matthews was unique. Now
+the college wants poets and creative writers."
+
+These are Professor Erskine's actual words. I asked him to repeat his
+last statement and he said, apparently with no sense of the amazement
+which his words caused in me, "The college wants the poets!" The stone
+which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner.
+
+But, then, there are poets and poets. There is, for example, Prof.
+Curtis Hidden Page. There is also one John Erskine, author of _Actæon
+and Other Poems_, and Adjunct Professor of English at Columbia
+University. There is also Prof. Alfred Noyes. But there are also some
+thousand or so poets in the United States who will be surprised to know
+that the college wants them. Academic appreciation of poets has
+generally consisted of a cordial welcome given their collected works two
+hundred years after their deaths.
+
+"English as a cultural finish," Professor Erskine continued, "has gone
+by the board. English is taught nowadays with as much seriousness as
+philosophy or history. Art in all its forms is considered as the history
+of the race, and treated seriously by the student as well as by the
+professor. To-day the students regard Shakespeare and Tennyson as very
+important men. They study them as in a course in philosophy they would
+study Bergson. Literature, philosophy, and history have been drawn
+together as one subject, as they should be."
+
+"What," I asked, "are some of the extra-curricular manifestations of
+literary interest among the students?"
+
+"In the first place," he answered, "the extraordinary amount of writing
+done by the students. It is not at all unusual now for a Columbia
+student to sell his work to the regular magazines. The student who
+writes for the magazines and newspapers is no longer a novelty.
+Randolph Bourne, who was recently graduated, contributed a number of
+essays to the _Atlantic Monthly_ during his junior and senior years.
+
+"Many of the students write for the newspapers. The better sort of
+newspaper humorists have had a strong influence on the undergraduate
+mind; they have shown the way to writing things that are funny but have
+an intellectual appeal. This has resulted in the production of some
+really excellent light verse. Also, Horace's stock has gone up.
+
+"During the last two years some remarkable plays have been handed into
+the Columbia University Dramatic Association. Not only were they
+serious, but also they were highly poetic.
+
+"And this," said Professor Erskine, "marks what I hope is the
+distinguishing literary atmosphere at Columbia. The trend of the plays
+written by Columbia students is strongly poetic. This is not true,
+perhaps, of the plays written by students of other institutions. The
+writers of plays want to write poetic plays, and--what is perhaps even
+more surprising--the other students do not consider poetic drama
+'high-brow stuff.'
+
+"Philolexian, the oldest of the Columbia literary societies, has been
+producing Elizabethan plays. These plays have been enthusiastically
+received, and the enthusiasm does not seem to show any signs of dying
+down. The students come to the study of these plays with a feeling of
+familiarity, for they have seen them acted."
+
+"Does this enthusiasm for literature show itself in the college
+magazine?" I asked.
+
+"It shows itself," answered Professor Erskine, "by the absence of a
+literary magazine. The literary magazine has completely collapsed. In
+small colleges, far away from the cities where the regular magazines are
+published, the college magazine is the only available outlet for the
+work of the students who can write. But here in New York the students
+know the condition of the literary market, and the more skilful writers
+among them do not care to give their writings to an amateur publication
+when they can sell them off the campus. So the _Columbia Monthly_ got
+only second-best material. The boys who really could write would not
+sacrifice their work by burying it in a college publication, so the
+_Columbia Monthly_ died.
+
+"The history of a literary club we have up here, called Boar's Head, is
+significant. It was started as a sort of revival of an older
+organization called King's Crown. At first the program consisted of an
+address at each meeting by some prominent writer. For a while the
+meetings were well attended, but gradually the interest died down.
+
+"At length I found what the trouble was--the boys wanted to do their own
+entertaining. Now work by the members is read at every meeting; there
+are no addresses by outsiders.
+
+"And here again the poetic trend of the undergraduate mind at Columbia
+is displayed. The Scribblers' Club, which consisted of short-story
+writers, is dead--there were not enough short-story writers to support
+it. And at the meetings of Boar's Head there have been read, during the
+past two years, only one or two short stories.
+
+"The boys bring plays and poems to the Boar's Head meetings, but not
+short stories. Last year most of the poems which were read were short
+lyrics. Toward the end of last year and during the present year longer
+poems have been read. They are not poems in the Masefield manner; they
+are modeled rather on Keats and Coleridge. This fact has interested me
+because the magazines, as a rule, have not been buying long poems. I
+was interested to see that William Stanley Braithwaite, in his excellent
+_Anthology of Magazine Verse and Year-Book of American Poetry_, calls
+attention to the increasing popularity of the longer poem.
+
+"Last year Boar's Head decided to bring out a little book containing the
+best of the poems that were read at its meetings. A number of
+subscribers at twenty-five cents each were procured, and _Quad Ripples_
+was published. It contained only short poems. This year Boar's Head has
+published _Odes and Episodes_, a collection of light verse by one of its
+former members, Archie Austin Coates. It soon will publish a collection
+of poems read at its meetings, and all these poems are long. Some of
+these poems are so good that it is a real sacrifice for the boys to have
+them printed in this book instead of in some magazine.
+
+"Of course, there were always 'literary men' at Columbia, but they were
+considered unusual. Now they no longer even form a class by themselves.
+One of our best writers of light verse is the captain of the baseball
+team.
+
+"Speaking of light verse and baseball," continued Professor Erskine,
+"there is a certain connection between the _Columbia Monthly_ and
+football, besides the obvious parallel which lies in the fact that both
+have ceased to exist. Some of the boys express eagerness to revive the
+college magazine, just as they express eagerness to revive football. But
+it is, I believe, merely a matter of pride with them. They are eager to
+have football and to have a college magazine; they are not so eager to
+contribute to the support of either institution.
+
+"One proof of the literary renascence of Columbia is that the essays
+written in the regular course of the work in philosophy and in English
+are better than ever before."
+
+"Do you believe," I asked, "that being in the city has had a good effect
+on literary activity among Columbia students?"
+
+He answered: "I do think so, decidedly. It has produced an extreme
+individualism and has given the boys enterprising minds. It is true that
+it has its disadvantages, it has made the student, so to speak,
+centrifugal, and has destroyed collegiate co-operation of the old sort.
+But it has produced an original, independent type of student.
+
+"The older type of college student was interested in football because he
+knew that people expected him to be interested in football. The
+Columbia student of to-day is interested in poetry, not because it is a
+Columbia tradition to be interested in poetry, but because his tastes
+are naturally literary."
+
+Several of the causes of this poetic renascence at Columbia had been
+mentioned in the course of our conversation, but Professor Erskine had
+ignored one of the most important of them. So I will mention it now. It
+is John Erskine.
+
+
+
+
+_CITY LIFE VERSUS LITERATURE_
+
+JOHN BURROUGHS
+
+
+"Well," said John Burroughs, "she doesn't seem to want us out here, so I
+guess we'll have to go in." So we left the little summer-house
+overlooking the Hudson and went into the bark-walled study.
+
+Now, "she" was a fat and officious robin, and her nest was in a corner
+of the summer-house just over my head, as I sat with the
+poet-naturalist. The nest was full of hungry and unprepossessing young
+robins, and the mother robin seemed to be annoyed in her visits to it by
+our talk. As we walked to the study, leaving to the robin family
+undisputed possession of the summer-house, I heard John Burroughs say in
+tones of mild indignation, half to himself and half to me:
+
+"I won't stand this another year! This is the third year she's taken
+possession of that summer-house, and next May she simply must build her
+nest somewhere else!"
+
+Nevertheless, I think that this impudent robin will rear her 1917 brood
+in John Burroughs's summer-house, if she wants to.
+
+When I walked up from the station to Riverby--John Burroughs's
+twenty-acre home on the west shore of the Hudson--I was surprised by the
+agility of my seventy-nine-year-old companion. He walked with the
+elastic step of a young man, and his eyes and brain were as alert as in
+the days when he showed Emerson and Whitman the wild wonders of the
+hills.
+
+"Living in the city," he said, "is a discordant thing, an unnatural
+thing. The city is a place to which one goes to do business; it is a
+place where men overreach one another in the fight for money. But it is
+not a place in which one can live.
+
+"Years ago, I think, it was possible to have a home in the city. I used
+to think that a home in Boston might possibly be imagined. But no one
+can have a home in New York in all that noise and haste.
+
+"Sometimes I am worried by the thought of the effect that life in the
+city will have on coming generations. All this grind and rush and roar
+of the Subway and the surface cars must have some effect on the children
+of New-Yorkers. And that effect cannot be good.
+
+"And what effect can it have on our literature? It might produce, I
+suppose, in the writer's mind, a sense of the necessity of haste, a
+passionate desire to get his effect as quickly as possible. But can it
+give him sharpness of intellect and keenness of æsthetic perception! I'd
+like to think so, but I can't. I don't see how literature can be
+produced in the city. Literature must have repose, and there is no
+repose in New York so far as I can see.
+
+"Of course I have no right to speak for other writers. Some people can
+find repose in the city--I can't. I hear that people write on the
+trains, on the omnibus, and in the Subway--I don't see how they do it!"
+
+"Have you noticed," I asked, as we left the lane and walked down a
+grassy slope toward the study, "that the city has not as yet set its
+mark on our literature?"
+
+"I think," said John Burroughs, "that much of our modern fiction shows
+what I may call a metropolitan quality; it seems made up of showy
+streets and electric light. But I don't know. I don't read much
+fiction. I turn more to poetry and to meditative essays. Some poets find
+beauty in the city, and they must, I suppose, find repose there. Richard
+Watson Gilder spent nearly all his life in a city and reflected the life
+of the city in his poems. And Edmund Clarence Stedman was thoroughly a
+poet of the city. I don't think that any of Emerson's poems smack of the
+city. They smack of the country, and of Emerson's study in the country,
+his study under the pines, where, as he wrote:
+
+ the sacred pine-tree adds
+ To the leaves her myriads.
+
+"Of the younger poets, John James Piatt has written beautifully of the
+city. He wrote a very fine poem called 'The Morning Street,' which
+appeared in the _Atlantic Monthly_ some years ago. In it he describes
+vividly the hush of early morning in a great city, when the steps of a
+solitary traveler echo from the walls of the sleeping houses. I don't
+suppose Piatt is known to many readers of this generation. He was a
+friend of Howells, and was the co-author with Howells of _Poems by Two
+Friends_, published in the early sixties. This was Howells's first
+venture."
+
+We were in the bark-walled study now, seated before the great stone
+fireplace, in which some logs were blazing. On the stone shelf I saw,
+among the photographs of Carlyle and Emerson and other friends of my
+host, a portrait of Whitman.
+
+"Your friend, Walt Whitman," I said, "got inspiration from the city."
+
+"Yes," said John Burroughs, "he got inspiration from the city, but you
+wouldn't call his poems city poetry. His way of writing wasn't
+metropolitan, you know; you might say that he treated the city by a
+country method. What he loved about the city was its people--he loved
+the throngs of men, he loved human associations.
+
+"But he was a born lover of cities, Whitman was. He loved the city in
+all its phases, mainly because he was such a lover of his kind, of the
+'human critter,' as he calls him. Whitman spent most of his life in the
+city, and was more at home there than in the country. He came to
+Brooklyn when he was a boy, and there he worked in a law-office, and as
+a printer and on the _Eagle_.
+
+"For a while, I remember, he drove a 'bus up and down Broadway when the
+driver, who was a friend of his, was sick. That's where he got the
+stuff he put in _The Funeral of an Old Omnibus-driver_. He put in it all
+the signs and catch-words of the 'bus-drivers."
+
+John Burroughs pointed his steady old hand at a big framed photograph on
+the wall. It is an unusual portrait of Walt Whitman, showing him seated,
+with his hands clasped, with a flaring shirt collar, like a sailor's.
+
+"Whitman," John Burroughs continued, "seems to be appealing more and
+more to young men. But in the modern Whitmanesque young poets I don't
+see much to suggest Whitman, except in form. They do clever things, but
+not elemental things, not things with a cosmic basis. Whitman, with all
+his commonness and nearness, reached out into the abysmal depths, as his
+imitators fail to do. I think Robert Frost has been influenced by
+Whitman. His _North of Boston_ is very good; it is genuine realism; it
+is a faithful, convincing picture of New England farm life. When I first
+saw the book I didn't think I'd read three pages of it, but I read it
+all with keen interest. It's absolutely true.
+
+"I used to see Whitman often when he and I were working in Washington.
+And he came up to see me here. When I was in Washington Whitman used to
+like to come up to our house for Sunday morning breakfast. Mrs.
+Burroughs makes capital pancakes, and Walt was very fond of them, but he
+was always late for breakfast. The coffee would boil over, the griddle
+would smoke, car after car would go jingling by, and no Walt. But a car
+would stop at last, and Walt would roll off it and saunter up to the
+door--cheery, vigorous, serene, putting every one in good humor. And how
+he ate! He radiated health and hopefulness. This is what made his work
+among the sick soldiers in Washington of such inestimable value. Every
+one who came into personal relations with him felt his rare, compelling
+charm.
+
+"Very few young literary men of Whitman's day accepted him. Stedman did,
+and the fact is greatly to his credit. Howells and Aldrich were repelled
+by his bigness. All the Boston poets except Emerson hesitated. Emerson
+didn't hesitate--unlike Lowell and Holmes, he kept open house for big
+ideas."
+
+I asked Mr. Burroughs what, in his opinion, had brought about the change
+in the world's attitude toward Whitman.
+
+"Well," he replied, looking thoughtfully into the radiant depths of the
+open fire, "when Whitman first appeared we were all subservient to the
+conventional standards of English literature. We understood and
+appreciated only the pretty and exact. Whitman came in his working-man's
+garb, in his shirt sleeves he sauntered into the parlor of literature.
+
+"We resented it. But the young men nowadays are more liberal. More and
+more Whitman is forcing on them his open-air standards. Science
+supplemented by the human heart gives us a bigger and freer world than
+our forefathers knew. And then the European acceptance of Whitman had
+had its effect. We take our point of view so largely from Europe. And a
+force like Whitman's must be felt slowly; it's a cumulative thing."
+
+"You believe," I said, "that Whitman is our greatest poet?"
+
+"Oh yes," he replied, "Whitman is the greatest poet America has
+produced. He is great with the qualities that make Homer and the classic
+poets great. Emerson is more precious, more intellectual. Whitman and
+Emerson are our two greatest poets."
+
+While we strolled over the pleasant turf and watched a wood-thrush
+resting in the cool of the evening above her half-built nest among the
+cherry blossoms, John Burroughs returned to the subject that we had
+discussed on our way from the station--the city's evil effect on
+literature.
+
+"Business life," he said, "is inimical to poetry. To write poetry you
+must get into an atmosphere utterly different from that of the city. And
+one of the greatest of all enemies of literature is the newspaper. The
+style of writing that the newspaper has brought into existence is as far
+as possible from art and literature. When you are writing for a daily
+paper, you don't try to say a thing in a poetic or artistic way, but in
+an efficient way, in a business-like way. There is no appeal to the
+imagination, no ideality. A newspaper is a noisy thing that goes out
+into the street and shouts its way into the attention of people.
+
+"If you are going to write poetry you must say to certain phases of the
+newspapers, 'Get thee behind me, Satan!' A poet can't be developing his
+gossiping faculty and turning everything hot off the griddle. The daily
+paper is a new institution, and it has come to stay. But it has bad
+manners, and it is the enemy of all meditation, all privacy, all things
+that make for great art.
+
+"It's the same way with nature and writing about nature. From nature we
+get not literature, but the raw material for literature. It is very
+important for us to remember that the bee does not get honey from the
+flowers; it makes honey from what it gets from the flowers. What it gets
+from the flowers is nothing but sweet water. The bee gets its sweet
+water, retires, thinks it over, and by a private process makes it into
+honey.
+
+"So many nature-writers fail to profit by the example of the bee. They
+go into the woods and come out again and write about their
+experience--but they don't give us honey. They don't retire and subject
+what they find in the woods to a private process. They don't give us
+honey; they give us just a little sweet water, pretty thoroughly
+diluted.
+
+"In my own work--if I may mention it in all humbleness--I have tried for
+years not to give the world just a bare record, but to flavor it, so to
+speak, with my own personality, as the bee turns the sweet water that it
+gets into honey by adding its own formic acid.
+
+"If I lived in the city I couldn't do any writing, unless I succeeded in
+obliterating the city from my consciousness. But I shouldn't try to
+force my standards on every one. Other men live in the cities and
+write--Carlyle did most of his work in London. But he lived a secluded
+life even in the city, and he had to have his yearly pilgrimage to
+Scotland."
+
+It is some years since John Burroughs has written poetry, although all
+his prose is clearly the work of a poet. And it is safe to say that
+better known than any of his intimate prose studies of the out-of-door
+world--better known even than _Wake Robin_ and that immortal _A Hunt for
+the Nightingale_ and _In Fresh Fields_--is one of his poems, _Waiting_,
+the poem that begins:
+
+ Serene, I fold my hands and wait,
+ Nor care for wind, nor tide, nor sea;
+ I rave no more 'gainst time or fate,
+ For lo! my own shall come to me.
+
+"I wrote _Waiting_," he said, "in 1862, when I was reading medicine in
+the office of a country physician. It was a dingy afternoon, and I was
+feeling pretty blue. But the thought came to me--I suppose I got it from
+Goethe or some of the Orientals, probably by way of Emerson--that what
+belonged to me would come to me in time, if I waited--and if I also
+hustled. So I waited and I hustled, and my little poem turned out to be
+a prophecy. My own has come to me, as I never expected it to come. The
+best friends I have were seeking me all the while. There's Henry Ford;
+he had read all my books, and he came to me--that great-hearted man, the
+friend of all the birds, and my friend.
+
+"The poem first appeared in the _Knickerbocker Magazine_. That magazine
+was edited by a Cockney named Kinneha Cornwallis. It ran long enough to
+print one of Cornwallis's novels, and then it died. I remember that the
+_Knickerbocker Magazine_ never paid me for _Waiting_, and the poem
+didn't attract any attention until Whittier printed it in his _Songs of
+Three Centuries_.
+
+"It has been changed and tampered with and had all sorts of things done
+to it. It was found among the manuscripts of a poet down South after his
+death, and his literary executor was going to print it in his book. He
+wrote to me and asked if I could show a date for it earlier than 1882. I
+said, 'Yes, 1862!' and that settled that matter.
+
+"There was a man in Boston that I wanted to kick! He wrote to me and
+asked if he could print _Waiting_ on a card and circulate it among his
+friends. I told him he could, and sent him an autographed copy to make
+sure he'd get it straight. He sent me a package of the printed cards,
+and I found that he had added a stanza to it--a religious stanza, all
+about Heaven's gate! He had left out the second stanza, and added this
+religious stanza. He was worried because God had been left out of my
+poem--poor God, ignored by a little atom like me!
+
+"When people ask me where I got the idea in it, I generally say that my
+parents were old-school Baptists and believed in foreordination, and
+that's the way that foreordination cropped out in me--it's a sort of
+transcendental version of foreordination. I think the poem is true--like
+attracts like; it's the way in which we are constituted, rather than any
+conscious factor, that insures success. It's that that makes our
+fortunes, it's that that is the 'tide in the affairs of men' that
+Shakespeare meant."
+
+A few rods from John Burroughs's riverside house a brown thrush is
+building her nest in a cherry-tree. She is a bird of individual ideas,
+and is thoroughly convinced that paper, not twigs and leaves, forms the
+proper basis for her work. It is pleasant to think of John Burroughs
+seated in his study communing with the memories of Whitman and Emerson,
+and his other great dead friends. But it is pleasanter to think of him,
+as I saw him, anxious and intent, his great white beard mingled with the
+cherry blossoms, as he strolled over to fix the paper base of the
+thrush's nest so that the wind could not destroy it.
+
+
+
+
+_"EVASIVE IDEALISM" IN LITERATURE_
+
+ELLEN GLASGOW
+
+
+What is the matter with American literature? There are many answers that
+might be made to this often-asked question. "Nothing" might be one
+answer. "Commercialism" might be another. But the answer given by Ellen
+Glasgow, whose latest successful novel of American manners and morals is
+_Life and Gabriella_, is "evasive idealism."
+
+I found the young woman who has found in our Southern States themes for
+sympathetic realism rather than picturesque romance temporarily
+resident, inappropriately enough, in a hotel not far from Broadway and
+Forty-second Street. And I found her to be a woman of many ideas and
+strong convictions. One strongly felt and forcibly expressed conviction
+was that the "evasive idealism" which is evident in so much of our
+popular fiction is in reality the chief blemish on the American
+character, manifesting its baleful influence in our political, social,
+and economic life. Miss Glasgow first used the term "evasive idealism"
+in an effort to explain why contemporary English novels are better than
+contemporary American novels.
+
+"Certainly," she said, "the novels written by John Galsworthy and the
+other English novelists of the new generation are better than anything
+that we are producing in the United States at the present time. And I
+think that the reason for this is that in America we demand from our
+writers, as we demand from our politicians, and in general from those
+who theoretically are our men of light and leading, an evasive idealism
+instead of a straightforward facing of realities. In England the demand
+is for a direct and sincere interpretation of life, and that is what the
+novelists of England, especially the younger novelists, are making. But
+what the American public seems to desire is the cheapest sort of sham
+optimism. And apparently our writers--a great many of them--are ready
+and eager to meet this demand.
+
+"You know the sort of book which takes best in this country. It is the
+sort of book in which there is not from beginning to end a single
+attempt to portray a genuine human being. Instead there are a number of
+picturesque and attractive lay figures, and one of them is made to
+develop a whimsical, sentimental, and maudlinly optimistic philosophy of
+life.
+
+"That is what the people want--a sugary philosophy, utterly without any
+basis in logic or human experience. They want the cheapest sort of false
+optimism, and they want it to be uttered by a picturesque, whimsical
+character, in humorous dialect. Books made according to this receipt
+sell by the hundreds of thousands.
+
+"I don't know which is the more tragic, the fact that a desire for this
+sort of literary pabulum exists, or the fact that there are so many
+writers willing to satisfy that desire. But I do know that the
+widespread enthusiasm for this sort of writing is the reason for the
+inferiority of our novels to those of England. And, furthermore, I think
+that this evasive idealism, this preference for a pretty sham instead of
+the truth, is evident not only in literature, but in every phase of
+American life.
+
+"Look at our politics! We tolerate corruption; graft goes on
+undisturbed, except for some sporadic attacks of conscience on the part
+of various communities. The ugliness of sin is there, but we prefer not
+to look at it. Instead of facing the evil and attacking it manfully we
+go after any sort of a false god that will detract our attention from
+our shame. Just as in literature we want the books which deal not with
+life as it is, but with life as it might be imagined to be lived, so in
+politics we want to face not hard and unpleasant facts, but agreeable
+illusions.
+
+"Nevertheless," said Miss Glasgow, "I think that in literature there are
+signs of a movement away from this evasive idealism. It is much more
+evident in England than in America, but I think that in the course of
+time it will reach us, too. We shall cease to be 'slaves of words,' as
+Sophocles said, and learn that the novelist's duty is to understand and
+interpret life. And when our novelists and our readers of novels
+appreciate the advisability of this attitude, then will the social and
+political life of the United States be more wholesome than it has been
+for many a year. The new movement in the novel is away from sentimental
+optimism and toward an optimism that is genuine and robust."
+
+"Then a novel may be at once optimistic and realistic?" I said. "That
+is not in accord with the generally received ideas of realism."
+
+"It is true of the work of the great realists," answered Miss Glasgow.
+"True realism is optimistic, without being sentimental."
+
+"What realists have been optimistic?" I asked.
+
+"Well," said Miss Glasgow, "Henry Fielding, one of the first and
+greatest of English realists, surely was an optimist. And there was
+Charles Dickens--often, it is true, he was sentimental, but at his best
+he was a robust optimist.
+
+"But the greatest modern example of the robust optimistic realist,
+absolutely free from sentimentality, is George Meredith. Galsworthy, who
+surely is a realist, is optimistic in such works as _The Freelands_ and
+_The Patricians_. And Meredith is always realistic and always
+optimistic.
+
+"The optimism I mean, the optimism which is a distinguishing
+characteristic of George Meredith's works, does not come from an evasion
+of facts, but from a recognition of them. The constructive novelist, the
+novelist who really interprets life, never ignores any of the facts of
+life. Instead, he accepts them and builds upon them. And he perceives
+the power of the will to control destiny; he knows that life is not what
+you get out of it, but what you put into it. This is what the younger
+English novelists know and what our novelists must learn. And it is
+their growing recognition of this spirit that makes me feel that the
+tendency of modern literature is toward democracy."
+
+"What is the connection between democracy and the tendency you have
+described?" I asked.
+
+"To me," Miss Glasgow answered, "true democracy consists chiefly in the
+general recognition of the truth that will create destiny. Democracy
+does not consist in the belief that all men are born free and equal or
+in the desire that they shall be born free and equal. It consists in the
+knowledge that all people should possess an opportunity to use their
+will to control--to create--destiny, and that they should know that they
+have this opportunity. They must be educated to the use of the will, and
+they must be taught that character can create destiny.
+
+"Of course, environment inevitably has its effect on the character, and,
+therefore, on will, and, therefore, on destiny. You can so oppress and
+depress the body that the will has no chance. True democracy provides
+for all equal opportunities for the exercise of will. If you hang a
+man, you can't ask him to exercise his will. But if you give him a
+chance to live--which is the democratic thing to do--then you put before
+him an opportunity to exercise his will."
+
+"But what are the manifestations of this new democratic spirit?" I
+asked. "Is not the war, which is surely the greatest event of our time,
+an anti-democratic thing?"
+
+"The war is not anti-democratic," Miss Glasgow replied, "any more than
+it is anti-autocratic. Or rather, I may say it is both anti-democratic
+and anti-autocratic. It is a conflict of principles, a deadly struggle
+between democracy and imperialism. It is a fight for the new spirit of
+democracy against the old evil order of things.
+
+"Of course, I do not mean that the democracy of France and England is
+perfect. But with all its imperfections it is nearer true democracy than
+is the spirit of Germany. We should not expect the democracy of our
+country to be perfect. The time has not come for that. 'Man is not man
+as yet,' as Browning said in _Paracelsus_.
+
+"The war is turning people away from the false standards in art and
+letters which they served so long. The highly artificial romantic novel
+and drama are impossible in Europe to-day. The war has made that sort
+of thing absolutely absurd. And America must be affected by this just as
+every other nation in the world is affected. To our novelists and to all
+of us must come a sense of the serious importance of actual life,
+instead of a sense of the beauty of romantic illusions. There are many
+indications of this tendency in our contemporary literature. For
+instance, in poetry we have the Spoon River Anthology--surely a sign of
+the return of the poet to real life. But the greatest poets, like the
+greatest novelists, have always been passionately interested in real
+life. Walt Whitman and Robert Browning always were realists and always
+were optimistic. Whitman was a most exultant optimist; he was optimistic
+even about dying.
+
+"Among recent books of verse I have been much impressed by Masefield's
+_Good Friday_. There is a work which is both august and sympathetic; Mr.
+Masefield's treatment of his theme is realistic, yet thoroughly
+reverent. There is one line in it which I think I never shall forget. It
+is, 'The men who suffer most endure the least.'
+
+"_Good Friday_ is a sign of literature's strong tendency toward reality.
+It seems to me to be a phase of the general breaking down of the
+barriers between the nations, the classes, and the sexes. But this
+breaking down of barriers is something that most of our novelists have
+been ignoring. Mary Watts has recognized it, but she is one of the very
+few American novelists to do so."
+
+"But this sort of consciousness is not generally considered to be a
+characteristic of the realistic novelist," I said. And I mentioned to
+Miss Glasgow a certain conspicuous American novelist whose books are
+very long, very dull, and distinguished only by their author's obsession
+with sex. He, I said, was the man of whom most people would think first
+when the word realist was spoken.
+
+"Of course," said Miss Glasgow, "we must distinguish between a realist
+and a vulgarian, and I do not see how a writer who is absolutely without
+humor can justly be called a realist. Consider the great realists--Jane
+Austen, Henry Fielding, Anthony Trollope, George Meredith--they all had
+humor. What our novelists need chiefly are more humor and a more serious
+attitude toward life. If our novelists are titanic enough, they will
+have a serious attitude toward life, and if they stand far enough off
+they will have humor.
+
+"I hope," Miss Glasgow added, "that America will produce better
+literature after the war. I hope that a change for the better will be
+evident in all branches of literary endeavor. We have to-day many
+novelists who start out with the serious purpose of interpreting life.
+But they don't interpret it. They find that it is easier to give the
+people what they want than to interpret life. Therefore this change in
+the character of our novels must come after the people themselves are
+awakened to a sense of the importance of real life, instead of life
+sentimentally and deceptively portrayed.
+
+"I think that our novels to-day are better than they were twenty-five
+years ago. Of course, we have no Hawthorne to-day, but the general
+average of stories is better than it was. We have so many accomplished
+writers of short stories. There is Katharine Fullerton Gerould. What an
+admirable artist she is! Mary E. Wilkins has written some splendid
+interpretations of New England life, and Miss Jewett reflected the mind
+and soul of a part of our country."
+
+
+
+
+_"CHOCOLATE FUDGE" IN THE MAGAZINES_
+
+FANNIE HURST
+
+
+Only a few years ago Fannie Hurst's name was unknown to most readers.
+But in a surprisingly short time Miss Hurst's short stories, especially
+her sympathetic and poignantly realistic studies of the life of the
+Jewish citizens of New York, have earned for her popular as well as
+critical approval.
+
+Fannie Hurst's fame has been won almost entirely through the most widely
+circulated weekly and monthly magazines. And yet when I talked to this
+energetic young woman the other morning in her studio in Carnegie Hall,
+I found her attitude toward the magazines anything but friendly. She
+accused them of printing what she called "chocolate-fudge" fiction. And
+she said it in a way which indicated that chocolate fudge is not her
+favorite dish.
+
+"I do not feel," she said, "that the American magazine is exerting
+itself toward influencing our fiction for the better. In most cases it
+is content to pander to the untutored public taste instead of attempting
+anything constructive.
+
+"The magazine public is, after all, open to conviction. But phlegm and
+commercialism on the part of most of our magazines lead them to give the
+public what it wants rather than what is good for it.
+
+"'If chocolate-fudge fiction will sell the magazine, give 'em chocolate
+fudge!' say editors and publishers. Small wonder that American
+fiction-readers continue bilious in their demands. Authors, meanwhile,
+who like sweet butter on their bread--it is amazing how many
+do--continue to postpone that Big Idea, and American fiction pauses by
+the wayside."
+
+"What is the remedy for this condition, Miss Hurst?" I asked. "Would
+matters be better if the writers did not have to comply with the demands
+of the magazines--if they had some other means of making a living than
+writing?"
+
+Miss Hurst did not answer at once. At length she said, thoughtfully:
+
+"It would seem that to escape this almost inevitable overlapping of
+bread and sweet butter the writer of short stories should not depend
+upon the sale of his work for a living, but should endeavor to provide
+himself with some other source of income.
+
+"Theoretically, at least, such a condition would eliminate the
+pot-boilers and safeguard the serious worker from the possibility of
+'misshaping' his art to meet a commercial condition.
+
+"I say theoretically because from my own point of view I cannot conceive
+of short-story writing as an avocation. The gentle art of short fiction
+consumes just about six hours of my day at the rate of from twenty to
+twenty-five days on a story of from eight to ten thousand words. And
+since I work best from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., I can think of no remunerative
+occupation outside those hours except cabaret work or night clerking."
+
+"What about present-day relationship between American publishers and
+authors?" I asked, "Do you think they are all they should be?"
+
+"American publishers and authors," Miss Hurst replied, "to-day seem to
+be working somewhat at cross-purposes, owing partially, I think, to the
+great commercial significance that has become attached to the various
+rights, such as motion-picture, serial, dramatic, book, etc., and which
+are to be reckoned with in the sale of fiction.
+
+"There is little doubt that authors have suffered at the hands of
+publishers on these various scores, oftener than not the publisher and
+not the author reaping the benefits accruing from the author's ignorance
+of conditions or lack of foresight.
+
+"The Authors' League has been formed to remedy just that evil--and it
+was a crying one.
+
+"On the other hand, it is certain that fiction-writers are better paid
+to-day than ever in the history of literature, and if a man is writing a
+seventy-five-dollar story there is a pretty good reason why.
+
+"I feel a great deal of hesitancy about the present proposed affiliation
+of authors with labor. There is so much to be said on both sides!
+
+"If the publisher represents capital and the author labor, my sympathies
+immediately veer me toward labor. But do they? That same question has
+recently been thrashed out by the actors, and they have gone over to
+labor. Scores of our most prominent American authors are of that same
+persuasion.
+
+"I cannot help but feel that for publisher and author to assume the
+relationship of employer and employee is a dangerous step. All forms of
+labor do not come under the same head. And I am the last to say that
+writing is not hard labor. But Cellini could hardly have allied himself
+with an iron-workers' guild. All men are mammals, but not all mammals
+are men!
+
+"It seems doubly unfortunate, with the Authors' League in existence to
+direct and safeguard the financial destiny of the author, to take a step
+which immediately places the author and publisher on the same basis of
+relationship that exists between hod-carrier and contractor.
+
+"As a matter of fact, I am almost wont to question the traditional lack
+of business acumen in authors. On the contrary, almost every successful
+author of my acquaintance not only is pretty well able to take care of
+himself, but owns a motor-car and a safety-deposit box at the same time.
+And I find the not-so-successful authors prodding pretty faithfully to
+get their prices up.
+
+"The Authors' League is a great institution and fills a great need. It
+was formed for just the purpose that seems to be prompting authors to
+unionize--to instruct authors in their rights and protect them against
+infringements.
+
+"Why unionize? Next, an author will find himself obliged to lay aside
+his pen when the whistle blows, and publishers will be finding
+themselves obliged to deal in open-shop literature."
+
+"And what effect are the moving pictures going to have on fiction?" I
+asked. "Will it be good or bad?"
+
+"Up to the present," Miss Hurst replied, "moving pictures have, in my
+opinion, been little else than a destructive force where American
+fiction is concerned. Picturized fiction is on a cheap and sensational
+level. Even classics and standardized fiction are ruthlessly defamed by
+tawdry presentation. With the mechanics of the motion picture so
+advanced, it is unfortunate that the photoplay itself is not keeping
+pace with that advancement.
+
+"Motion pictures are in the hands of laymen, and they show it. The
+scenario-writers, so-called 'staff writers,' have sprung up overnight,
+so to speak, and, from what I understand, when authors venture into the
+field they are at the mercy of the moving-picture director.
+
+"Mrs. Frances Hodgson Burnett could not endure to sit through the
+picture presentation of _Little Lord Fauntleroy_, so mutilated was it.
+
+"Of course, scenario-writing is a new art, and this interesting form of
+expression has hardly emerged from its infancy. Except perhaps in such
+great spectacles as 'The Birth of a Nation,' where, after all, the play
+is not the thing."
+
+I asked Miss Hurst if she agreed with those who believe that Edgar Allan
+Poe's short stories have never been surpassed. I found that she did not.
+
+"I should say," she said, "that since Poe's time we have had masters of
+the short story who have equaled him. Poe is, of course, the legitimate
+father of the American short story, and, coupled with that fact, was
+possessed of that kind of self-consciousness which enabled him to
+formulate a law of composition which has not been without its influence
+upon our subsequent short fiction.
+
+"But in American letters there is little doubt that in the last one
+hundred years the short story has made more progress than any other
+literary type. We are becoming not only proficient, but pre-eminent in
+the short story. I can think off-hand of quite a group of writers, each
+of whom has contributed short-story classics to our literature.
+
+"There are Robert Louis Stevenson, Henry James (if we may claim him),
+Bret Harte, Mark Twain, Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, O. Henry, Richard
+Harding Davis, Jack London, and Booth Tarkington. And I am sure that
+there are various others whose names do not occur to me at this moment."
+
+"You mentioned O. Henry," I said. "Then you do not share Katharine
+Fullerton Gerould's belief that O. Henry's influence on modern fiction
+is bad?"
+
+"I decidedly disagree," said Miss Hurst, with considerable firmness,
+"with the statement that O. Henry wrote incidents rather than short
+stories, and is a pernicious influence in modern letters. That his
+structural form is more than anecdotal can be shown by an analysis of
+almost any of his plots.
+
+"But it seems pedantic to criticize O. Henry on the score of structure.
+Admitting that the substance of his writings does rest on frail
+framework, even sometimes upon the trick, he built with Gothic skill and
+with no obvious pillars of support.
+
+"Corot was none the less a landscape artist because he removed that
+particular brown tree from that particular green slope. O. Henry's
+facetiousness and, if you will, his frail structures, are no more to be
+reckoned with than, for instance, the extravagance of plot and the
+morbid formality we find in Poe.
+
+"The smiting word and the polished phrase he quite frankly subordinated
+to the laugh, or the tear with a sniffle. Just as soon call red woolen
+underwear pernicious!
+
+"The Henry James school has put a super-finish upon literature which, it
+is true, gives the same satisfying sense of wholeness that we get from a
+Greek urn. But, after all, chastity is not the first and last requisite.
+O. Henry loved to laugh with life! It was not in him to regard it with a
+Mona Lisa smile."
+
+Miss Hurst has confined her attention so closely to American
+metropolitan life that I thought it would be interesting to have her
+opinion as to the truth of the remark, attributed to William Dean
+Howells, that American literature is merely a phase of English
+literature. In reply to my question she said:
+
+"I agree with Mr. Howells that American literature up to now has been
+rather a phase of English literature. His own graceful art is an example
+of cousinship. American literature probably will continue to be an
+effort until our American melting-pot ceases boiling.
+
+"_David Copperfield_ and _Vanity Fair_ come from a people whose lineage
+goes back by century-plants and not by Mayflowers. Theodore Dreiser and
+Ernest Poole, sometimes more or less inarticulately, are preparing us
+for the great American novel. When we reach a proper consistency the
+boiling is bound to cease, and, just as inevitably, the epic novel must
+come."
+
+
+
+
+_THE NEW SPIRIT IN POETRY_
+
+AMY LOWELL
+
+
+Miss Amy Lowell, America's chief advocate and practitioner of the new
+poetry, would wear, I supposed, a gown by Bakst, with many Oriental
+jewels. And incense would be burning in a golden basin. And Miss Lowell
+would say that the art of poetry was discovered in 1916.
+
+But there is nothing exotic or artificial about Miss Lowell's appearance
+and surroundings. Nor did the author of _Sword Blades and Poppy Seed_
+express, when I talked to her the other day, any of the extravagant
+opinions which conservative critics attribute to the _vers libristes_.
+Miss Lowell talked with the practicality which is of New England and the
+serenity which is of Boston; she was positive, but not narrowly
+dogmatic; she is keenly appreciative of contemporary poetry, but she has
+the fullest sense of the value of the great heritage of poetical
+tradition that has come down to us through the ages.
+
+There is so much careless talk of _imagisme_, _vers libre_, and the new
+poetry in general that I thought it advisable to begin our talk by
+asking for a definition or a description of the new poetry. In reply to
+my question Miss Lowell said:
+
+"The thing that makes me feel sure that there is a future in the new
+poetry is the fact that those who write it follow so many different
+lines of thought. The new poetry is so large a subject that it can
+scarcely be covered by one definition. It seems to me that there are
+four definite sorts of new poetry, which I will attempt to describe.
+
+"One branch of the new poetry may be called the realistic school. This
+branch is descended partly from Whitman and partly from the
+prose-writers of France and England. The leading exponents of it are
+Robert Frost and Edgar Lee Masters. These two poets are different from
+each other, but they both are realists, they march under the same
+banner.
+
+"Another branch of the new poetry consists of the poets whose work shows
+a mixture of the highly imaginative and the realistic. Their thought
+verges on the purely imaginative, but is corrected by a scientific
+attitude of mind. I suppose that this particular movement in English
+poetry may be said to have started with Coleridge, but in England the
+movement hardly attained its due proportions. Half of literary England
+followed Wordsworth, half followed Byron. It is in America that we find
+the greatest disciple of Coleridge in the person of Edgar Allan Poe. The
+force of the movement then went back to France, where it showed clearly
+in Mallarmê and the later symbolists. To-day we see this tendency
+somewhat popularized in Vachell Lindsay, although perhaps he does not
+know it. And if I may be so bold as to mention myself, I should say that
+I in common with most other imagists belong to this branch, that I am at
+once a fantasist and a realist.
+
+"Thirdly, we have the lyrico-imaginative type of poet. Of this branch
+the best example that I can call to mind is John Gould Fletcher. The
+fourth group of the new poets consists of those who are descended
+straight from Matthew Arnold. They show the Wordsworth influence
+corrected by experience and education. Browning is in their line of
+descent. Characteristics of their work are high seriousness,
+astringency, and a certain pruning down of poetry so that redundancy is
+absolutely avoided. Of this type the most striking example is Edwin
+Arlington Robinson."
+
+"Miss Lowell," I said, "the opponents of the new poetry generally attack
+it chiefly on account of its form--or rather, on account of its
+formlessness. And yet what you have said has to do only with the idea
+itself. You have said nothing about the way in which the idea is
+expressed."
+
+"There is no special form which is characteristic of the new poetry,"
+said Miss Lowell, "and of course 'formlessness' is a word which is
+applied to it only by the ignorant. The new poetry is in every form.
+Edgar Lee Masters has written in _vers libre_ and in regular rhythm.
+Robert Frost writes in blank verse. Vachell Lindsay writes in varied
+rhyme schemes. I write in both the regular meters and the newer forms,
+such as _vers libre_ and 'polyphonic prose.'
+
+"It is a mistake to suppose, as many conservative critics do, that
+modern poetry is a matter of _vers libre_. _Vers libre_ is not new, but
+it is valuable to give vividness when vividness is desired. _Vers libre_
+is a difficult thing to write well, and a very easy thing to write
+badly. This particular branch of the new poetry movement has been
+imitated so extensively that it has brought the whole movement into
+disrepute in the eyes of casual observers. But we must remember that no
+movement is to be judged by its obscure imitators. A movement must be
+judged by the few people at its head who make the trend. There cannot be
+many of them. In the history of the world there are only a few supreme
+artists, only a small number of great artists, only a limited number of
+good artists. And to suppose that we in America at this particular
+moment can be possessed of many artists worthy of consideration is
+ridiculous.
+
+"Undoubtedly the fact that a great number of people are engaged to-day
+in producing poetry is a great stimulus and helps to create a proper
+atmosphere for those men whose work may live. For it is a curious fact
+that the artistic names that have come down to us are those of men who
+have lived in the so-called great artistic periods, when many other men
+were working at the same thing."
+
+I asked Miss Lowell to tell something of this _vers libre_ which is so
+much discussed and so little understood. She said:
+
+"_Vers libre_ is based upon rhythm. Its definition is 'A verse form
+based upon cadence rather than upon exact meter.' It is a little
+difficult to define cadence when dealing with poetry. I might call it
+the sense of balance.
+
+"The unit of _vers libre_ is the strophe, not the line or the foot, as
+in regular meter. The strophe is a group of words which round themselves
+satisfactorily to the ear. In short poems this complete rounding may
+take place only at the end, making the poem a unit of a single movement,
+the lines serving only to give the slight up-and-down effect necessary
+to the voice when the poem is read aloud.
+
+"In longer poems the strophe may be a group of lines. Poetry being a
+spoken and not a written art, those not well versed in the various
+poetic forms will find it simpler to read _vers libre_ poems aloud,
+rather than to try to get their rhythm from the printed page. For people
+who are used only to the exact meters, the printed arrangement of a
+_vers libre_ poem is a confusing process. To a certain extent cadence is
+dependent upon quantity--long and short syllables being of peculiar
+importance. Words hurried over in reading are balanced by words on which
+the reader pauses. Remember, also, that _vers libre_ can be either
+rhymed or unrhymed."
+
+"One objection," I said, "that many critics bring up against unrhymed
+poetry is that it cannot be remembered."
+
+"I cannot see that that is of the slightest importance," Miss Lowell
+replied. "The music that we whistle when we come out of the theater is
+not the greatest music we have heard.
+
+ "Zaccheus he
+ Did climb a tree
+ His Lord to see
+
+is easily remembered. But I refuse to think that it is great poetry.
+
+"The enemies of _vers libre_," she continued, "say that _vers libre_ is
+in no respect different from oratory. Now, there is a difference between
+the cadence of _vers libre_ and the cadence of oratory. Lincoln's
+Gettysburg address is not _vers libre_, it is rhythmical prose. At the
+prose end of cadence is rhythmical prose; at the verse end is _vers
+libre_. The difference is in the kind of cadence.
+
+"Recently a writer in _The Nation_ took some of Meredith's prose and
+made it into _vers libre_ poems which any poet would have been glad to
+write. Then he took some of my poems and turned them into prose, with a
+result which he was kind enough to call beautiful. He then pertinently
+asked what was the difference.
+
+"I might answer that there is no difference. Typography is not relevant
+to the discussion. Whether a thing is written as prose or as verse is
+immaterial. But if we would see the advantage which Meredith's
+imagination enjoyed in the freer forms of expression, we need only
+compare these lyrical passages from his prose works with his own
+metrical poetry."
+
+I asked Miss Lowell about the charge that the new poets are lacking in
+reverence for the great poets of the past. She believes that the charge
+is unfounded. Nevertheless, she believes that the new poets do well to
+take the New England group of writers less seriously than conservative
+critics would have them take them.
+
+"America has produced only two great poets, Whitman and Poe," said Miss
+Lowell. "The rest of the early American poets were cultivated gentlemen,
+but they were more exactly English provincial poets than American poets,
+and they were decidedly inferior to the parent stock. The men of the New
+England group, with the single exception of Emerson, were cultivated
+gentlemen with a taste for literature--they never rose above that level.
+
+"No one can judge his contemporaries. We cannot say with certainty that
+the poets of this generation are better than their predecessors. But
+surely we can see that the new poets have more originality, more of the
+stuff out of which poetry is made, than their predecessors had, aside
+from the two great exceptions that I have mentioned."
+
+"What is the thing that American poetry chiefly needs?" I asked.
+
+"Well," said Miss Lowell, "I wish that there were a great many changes
+in our attitude toward literature. I wish that no man could expect to
+make a living by writing. I wish that the magazines did not pay for
+contributions--few of them do in France, you know. And I wish that the
+newspapers did not try to review books. But the thing that we chiefly
+need is informed and authoritative criticism.
+
+"We have very few critics, we have practically none who are writing
+separate books on contemporary verse. When I was writing my _French
+Poets_ I read twenty or thirty books on contemporary French poetry,
+serious books, written by critics who make a specialty of the poetry of
+their own day.
+
+"We have nothing like this in America. The men who write critical books
+write of the literature of a hundred years ago. No critical mind is
+bent toward contemporary verse. There are a few newspaper critics who
+pay serious attention to contemporary verse--William Stanley
+Braithwaite, O. W. Firkins, and Louis Untermeyer, for example--but there
+are only a few of them.
+
+"What is to be desired is for some one to be as interested in criticism
+as the poets are in poetry. It was the regularity of Sainte-Beuve's
+'Causeries du Lundi' that gave it its weight. What we want is a critic
+like that, who is neither an old man despairing of a better job nor a
+young man using his newspaper work as a stepping-stone to something
+higher. Of course, brilliant criticisms of poetry appear from time to
+time, but what we need is criticism as an institution.
+
+"After all," said Miss Lowell, in conclusion, "there are only two kinds
+of poetry, good poetry and bad poetry. The form of poetry is a matter of
+individual idiosyncrasy. It is only the very young and the very old, the
+very inexperienced or the numbed, who say, 'This is the only way in
+which poetry shall be written!'"
+
+
+
+
+_A NEW DEFINITION OF POETRY_
+
+EDWIN ARLINGTON ROBINSON
+
+
+At no time in the history of literature have the critics been able to
+agree upon a definition of poetry. And the recent popularity of _vers
+libre_ and _imagisme_ has made the definer's task harder than ever
+before. Is rhyme essential to poetry? Is rhythm essential to poetry? Can
+a mere reflection of life justly be called poetry, or must imagination
+be present?
+
+I put some of these questions to Edwin Arlington Robinson, who wrote
+_Captain Craig_, _The Children of the Night_, _The Town Down the River_,
+_The Man Against the Sky_ and _Merlin: A Poem_. And this man, whom
+William Stanley Braithwaite and other authoritative critics have called
+the foremost of American poets, this student of life, who was revealing
+the mysterious poetry of humanity many years before Edgar Lee Masters
+discovered to the world the vexed spirits that haunt Spoon River,
+rewarded my questioning with a new definition of poetry. He said:
+
+"Poetry is a language that tells us, through a more or less emotional
+reaction, something that cannot be said.
+
+"All real poetry, great or small, does this," he added. "And it seems to
+me that poetry has two characteristics. One is that it is, after all,
+undefinable. The other is that it is eventually unmistakable."
+
+"'Eventually'!" I said. "Then you think that poetry is not always
+appreciated in the lifetime of its maker?"
+
+Mr. Robinson smiled whimsically. "I never use words enough," he said.
+"It is not unmistakable as soon as it is published, but sooner or later
+it is unmistakable.
+
+"And in the poet's lifetime there are always some people who will
+understand and appreciate his work. I really think that it is impossible
+for a real poet permanently to escape appreciation. And I can't imagine
+anything sillier for a man to do than to worry about poetry that has
+once been decently published. The rest is in the hands of Time, and Time
+has more than often a way of making a pretty thorough job of it."
+
+"But why is it," I asked, "that a great poet so often is without honor
+in his own generation, where mediocrity is immediately famous?"
+
+"It's hard to say," said Mr. Robinson, thoughtfully regarding the
+glowing end of his cigar. "Many causes prevent poetry from being
+correctly appraised in its own time. Any poetry that is marked by
+violence, that is conspicuous in color, that is sensationally odd, makes
+an immediate appeal. On the other hand, poetry that is not noticeably
+eccentric sometimes fails for years to attract any attention.
+
+"I think that this is why so many of Kipling's worst poems are greatly
+overpraised, while some of his best poems are not appreciated. _Gunga
+Din_, which is, of course, a good thing in its way, has been praised far
+more than it deserves, because of its oddity. And the poem beginning
+'There's a whisper down the field' has never been properly appreciated.
+It's one of the very best of Kipling's poems, although it is marred by a
+few lapses of taste. One of his greatest poems, by the way, _The
+Children of the Zodiac_, happens to be in prose.
+
+"But I am always revising my opinion of Kipling. I have changed my mind
+about him so often that I have no confidence in my critical judgment.
+That is one of the reasons why I do not like to criticise my American
+contemporaries."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that this tendency to pay attention chiefly to
+the more sensational poets is as characteristic of our generation as of
+those that came before?"
+
+"I think it applies particularly to our own time," he replied. "More
+than ever before oddity and violence are bringing into prominence poets
+who have little besides these two qualities to offer the world, and some
+who have much more. It may seem very strange to you, but I think that a
+great modern instance of this tendency is the case of Robert Browning.
+The eccentricities of Browning's method are the things that first turned
+popular attention upon him, but the startling quality in Browning made
+more sensation in his own time than it can ever make again. I say this
+in spite of the fact that Browning and Wordsworth are taken as the
+classic examples of slow recognition. Wordsworth, you know, had no
+respect for the judgment of youth. It may have been sour grapes, but I
+am inclined to think that there was a great deal of truth in his
+opinion.
+
+"I think it is safe to say that all real poetry is going to give at some
+time or other a suggestion of finality. In real poetry you find that
+something has been said, and yet you find also about it a sort of nimbus
+of what can't be said.
+
+"This nimbus may be there--I wouldn't say that it isn't there--and yet I
+can't find it in much of the self-conscious experimenting that is going
+on nowadays in the name of poetry.
+
+"I can't get over the impression," Mr. Robinson went on, with a
+meditative frown, "that these post-impressionists in painting and most
+of the _vers libristes_ in poetry are trying to find some sort of short
+cut to artistic success. I know that many of the new writers insist that
+it is harder to write good _vers libre_ than to write good rhymed
+poetry. And judging from some of their results, I am inclined to agree
+with them."
+
+I asked Mr. Robinson if he believed that the evident increase in
+interest in poetry, shown by the large sales of the work of Robert Frost
+and Edgar Lee Masters and Rupert Brooke, indicated a real renascence of
+poetry.
+
+"I think that it indicates a real renascence of poetry," he replied. "I
+am sufficiently child-like and hopeful to find it very encouraging."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that the poetry that is written in America
+to-day is better than that written a generation ago?"
+
+"I should hardly venture to say that," said Mr. Robinson. "For one
+thing, we have no Emerson. Emerson is the greatest poet who ever wrote
+in America. Passages scattered here and there in his work surely are the
+greatest of American poetry. In fact, I think that there are lines and
+sentences in Emerson's poetry that are as great as anything anywhere."
+
+I asked Mr. Robinson whether he thought the modern English poets were
+doing better work than their American contemporaries. At first he was
+unwilling to express an opinion on this subject, repeating his statement
+that he mistrusted his own critical judgment. But he said:
+
+"Within his limits, I believe that A. E. Housman is the most authentic
+poet now writing in England. But, of course, his limits are very sharply
+drawn. I don't think that any one who knows anything about poetry will
+ever think of questioning the inspiration of _A Shropshire Lad_."
+
+"Would you make a similar comment on any other poetry of our time?" I
+asked.
+
+"Well," said Mr. Robinson, reflectively, "I think that no one will
+question the inspiration of some of Kipling's poems, of parts of John
+Masefield's _Dauber_, and some of the long lyrics of Alfred Noyes. But I
+do not think that either of these poets gives the impression of finality
+which A. E. Housman gives. But the way in which I have shifted my
+opinion about some of Rudyard Kipling's poems, and most of Swinburne's,
+makes me think that Wordsworth was very largely right in his attitude
+toward the judgment of youth. But where my opinions have shifted, I
+think now that I always had misgivings. I fancy that youth always has
+misgivings in regard to what is later to be modified or repudiated."
+
+Then I asked Mr. Robinson if he thought that the war had anything to do
+with the renascence of poetry.
+
+"I can't see any connection," he replied. "The only effect on poetry
+that the war has had, so far as I know, is to produce those five sonnets
+by Rupert Brooke. I can't see that it has caused any poetical event. And
+there's no use prophesying what the war will or will not do to poetry,
+because no one knows anything about it. The Civil War seems to have had
+little effect on poetry except to produce Julia Ward Howe's _Battle
+Hymn of the Republic_, Whitman's poems on the death of Lincoln, and
+Lowell's 'Ode.'"
+
+"Mr. Robinson," I said, "there has been much discussion recently about
+the rewards of poetry, and Miss Amy Lowell has said that no poet ought
+to be expected to make a living by writing. What do you think about it?"
+
+"Should a poet be able to make a living out of poetry?" said Mr.
+Robinson. "Generally speaking, it is not possible for a poet to make a
+decent living by his work. In most cases it would be bad for his
+creative faculties for a poet to make as much money as a successful
+novelist makes. Fortunately, there is no danger of that. Now, assuming
+that a poet has enough money to live on, the most important thing for
+him to have is an audience. I mean that the best poetry is likely to be
+written when poetry is in the air. If a poet with no obligations and
+responsibilities except to stay alive can't live on a thousand dollars a
+year (I don't undertake to say just how he is going to get it), he'd
+better go into some other business."
+
+"Then you don't think," I said, "that literature has lost through the
+poverty of poets?"
+
+"I certainly do believe that literature has lost through the poverty of
+poets," said Mr. Robinson. "I don't believe in poverty. I never did. I
+think it is good for a poet to be bumped and knocked around when he is
+young, but all the difficulties that are put in his way after he gets to
+be twenty-five or thirty are certain to take something out of his work.
+I don't see how they can do anything else.
+
+"Some time ago you asked me," said Mr. Robinson, "how I accounted for
+our difficulty in making a correct estimate of the poetry of one's own
+time. The question is a difficult one. I don't even say that it has an
+answer. But the solution of the thing seems to me to be related to what
+I said about the quality of finality that seems to exist in all real
+poetry. Finality seems always to have had a way of not obtruding itself
+to any great extent."
+
+
+
+
+_LET POETRY BE FREE_
+
+JOSEPHINE PRESTON PEABODY
+
+
+Mrs. Lionel Marks--or Josephine Preston Peabody, to call her by the name
+which she has made famous--is a poet whose tendency has always been
+toward democracy. From _The Singing Leaves_, her first book of lyrics,
+to _The Piper_ (the dramatic poem which received the Stratford-on-Avon
+prize in 1910), and _The Wolf of Gubbio_, the poetic representation of
+events in St. Francis's life in her latest published book, she has
+chosen for her theme not fantastic and rare aspects of nature, nor the
+new answers of her own emotions, but things that are common to all
+normal mankind--such as love and religion. Also, without seeming to
+preach, she is always expressing her love for Liberty, Equality, and
+Fraternity, and although she never dwells upon the overworked term, she
+is as devoted an adherent of the brotherhood of man as was William
+Morris.
+
+Therefore I was eager to learn whether or not she held the
+opinion--often expressed during the past months--that poetry is becoming
+more democratic, less an art practised and appreciated by the chosen
+few. Also I wanted to know if she saw signs of this democratization of
+poetry in the development of free verse, or _vers libre_, as those who
+write it prefer to say, in the apparently growing tendency of poets to
+give up the use of rhyme and rhythm.
+
+"Certainly, poetry is steadily growing more democratic," said Mrs.
+Marks. "More people are writing poetry to-day than fifty years ago, and
+the appreciation of poetry is more general. Most poets of genuine
+calling are writing now with the world in mind as an audience, not
+merely for the entertainment of a little literary cult.
+
+"But I do not think that the _vers libre_ fad has any connection with
+this tendency, or with the development of poetry at all. Indeed, I do
+not think that the cult is growing; we hear more of it in the United
+States than we did a year or two ago, but that is chiefly because London
+and Paris have outworn its novelty, so the _vers libristes_ concentrate
+their energies on Chicago and New York.
+
+"I love some 'free verse.' Certainly, there may be times when a poet
+finds he can express his idea or his emotion better without rhyme and
+rhythm than with them. But verse that is ostentatiously free--free verse
+that obviously has been made deliberately--that is a highly artificial
+sort of writing, bears no more relation to literature than does an
+acrostic. Neither the themes nor the methods of those who call
+themselves _vers libristes_ are democratic; they are, in the worst sense
+of the word, the sense which came into use at the time of the French
+Revolution, aristocratic.
+
+"The canon of the _vers libristes_ is essentially aristocratic. They
+contend, absurdly enough, that all traditional forms of rhyme and rhythm
+constitute a sort of bondage, and therefore they arbitrarily rule them
+out. Not for them are the fetters that bound Shelley's spirit to the
+earth! Also they arbitrarily rule out what they call, with their
+fondness for labels, the 'sociological note,' 'didacticism,'
+'meanings'--any ideas or emotions, in fact, that may be called communal
+or democratic.
+
+"My own canon is that all themes are fit for poetry and that all methods
+must justify themselves. If I may be permitted to make a clumsy
+wooden-toy apothegm I would say that poetry is rhythmic without and
+within. If we turn Carlyle's sometimes cloudy prose inside out we find
+that it has a silver lining of poetry.
+
+"Neither can I understand why the _vers libristes_ believe that their
+sort of writing is new. Leopardi wrote what would be called good
+_imagisme_, although the _imagistes_ do not seem to be aware of the
+fact, and the theory that rhyme is undesirable in poetry has appeared
+sporadically time and again in the history of poetry. When Sir Philip
+Sidney was alive there were pedants who argued against the use of rhyme,
+and some of them confuted their own arguments by writing charming lyrics
+in the traditional manner. By dint of reading the fine eye-cracking
+print in the Globe Edition of Spenser I found that the author of the
+_Faerie Queen_ at one time took seriously Gabriel Harvey's arguments
+against rhyme and made an unbelievably frightful experiment in rhymeless
+verse--as bad as the parodists of our band-wagon.
+
+"The other day I asked some one in the Greek department of Harvard how
+to read a fragment of Sappho's that I wanted to teach my children to
+say. He said that no one nowadays could know how certain of Sappho's
+poems really should be read, because the music for them had been lost,
+and they were all true lyrics, meant to be sung and sung by Sappho to
+music of her own making. So you see that poets who avowedly make verses
+that can appeal only to the eye, successions of images, in which the
+position of the words on the page is of great importance, believe that
+they are the successors of poets whose work was meant not to be read,
+but to be sung, whose verses fitted the regular measure of music.
+
+"As I said before," said Mrs. Marks, smiling, "I have no objection to
+free verse when it is a spontaneous expression. But I do object to free
+verse when it is organized into a cult that denies other freedoms to
+other poets! And I object to the bigotry of some of the people who are
+trying to impose free verse upon an uninterested world.
+
+"And also I object to the unfairness of some of the advocates of free
+verse. When they compare free verse, and what I suppose I must call
+chained verse, they take the greatest example of unrhymed poetry that
+they can find--the King James version of the Book of Job, perhaps--and
+say: 'This is better than "Yankee Doodle." Therefore, free verse is
+better than traditional verse.'
+
+"You see," said Mrs. Marks, "the commonest thing there is, I may say the
+most democratic thing, is the rhythm of the heart-beat. A true poet
+cannot ignore this. At the greatest times in his life, when he is filled
+with joy or despair, or when he has a sense of portent, man is aware of
+his heart, of its beat, of its recurrent tick, tick; he is aware of the
+rhythm of life. When we are dying, perhaps the only sense that remains
+with us is the sense of rhythm--the feeling that the grains of sand are
+running, running, running out.
+
+"The pulse-beat is a tremendous thing. It is the basis of all that men
+have in common. All life is locked up in its regularly recurrent rhythm.
+And it is that rhythm that appears in our love-songs, our war-songs, in
+all the poetry of the human cycle from lullabies to funeral chants. In
+the great moments of life men feel that they must be sharing, that they
+must have something in common with other men, and so their emotions
+crystallize into the ritual of rhythm, which is the most democratic
+thing that there is.
+
+"Primitive poetry, poetry that comes straight from the hearts of the
+people, sometimes circulating for generations without being committed to
+paper, is strongly traditional. The convention of regular rhyme and
+rhythm is never absent. What could be more conventional and more
+democratic than the old ballad, with its recurrent refrain in which the
+audience joined? Centuries ago in the Scotch Highlands the
+ballad-makers, like the men who wrote the 'Come-all-ye's' in our
+great-grandfather's time, used regular rhyme and rhythm. And if these
+poets were not democratic, then there never was such a thing as a
+democratic poet."
+
+"But is it not true," I asked, "that Whitman is considered the most
+democratic poet of his day, and that his avoidance of rhyme and regular
+rhythm is advanced as proof of his democracy?"
+
+"Whitman," said Mrs. Marks, "was a democrat in principle, but not in
+poetic practice. He loved humanity, but he still waits to reach his
+widest audience because his verse lacks strongly stressed, communal
+music. The only poems which he wrote that really reached the hearts of
+the people quickly are those which are most nearly traditional in
+form--_When Lilacs Last in Dooryards Bloomed_ and _Captain, My Captain!_
+in which he used rhyme.
+
+"You see, nothing else establishes such a bond with memory as rhyme.
+
+"Did you ever think," said Mrs. Marks, suddenly, "that the truest
+exuberance of life always expresses itself rhythmically? Children are
+generous with the most intricate rhythms; they do not eat ice-cream in
+the disorderly grown-up way; they eat it in a pattern, turning the
+saucer around and around; they skit alternate flagstones or every third
+step on the stairway. Because they are overflowing with life they
+express themselves in rhythm. _Vers libre_ is too grown-up to be the
+most vital poetry; one of the ways in which the poet must be like a
+little child is in possessing an exuberance of life. His life must
+overflow.
+
+"The poets especially remember that Christ said, 'I am come that ye
+might have life and that ye might have it more abundantly.'
+
+"The rhythm of life," said Mrs. Marks, thoughtfully. "The rhythm of
+life. Who is conscious of his heart-beats except at the great moments of
+life, and who is unconscious of them then? The music of poetry is the
+witness of that intense moment when there is discovered to man or woman,
+when there reverberates through his brain and being, the tremendous
+rhythm and refrain whereby we live."
+
+Mrs. Marks has no patience with those who use the term "sociological" in
+depreciation of all poetry that is not intensely subjective and
+personal.
+
+"There are some critics," she said, "who would condemn the Lord's Prayer
+as 'sociological' because it begins 'Our Father' instead of 'My Father.'
+
+"The true poet must be a true democrat; he must, if he can, share with
+all the world the vision that lights him; he must be in sympathy with
+the people. The war has made a great many European poets aware of this
+fact. Think how the war changed Rupert Brooke, for instance? He had been
+a most aristocratic poet, making poems, some of which could only repel
+minds less in love with the fantastic. But he shared the great emotion
+of his countrymen, and so he wrote out of his deeply wakened, sudden
+simplicity those sonnets which they all can understand and must forever
+cherish.
+
+"The war will help make poetry. It has swept away the fads and cults
+from Europe; they find a peaceful haven in the United States, but they
+will not live as dogmas. In the democracy that is soon to come may all
+'isms' founder and lose themselves! And may all true freedoms come into
+their own, with the maker, his mind and his tools."
+
+
+
+
+_THE HERESY OF SUPERMANISM_
+
+CHARLES RANN KENNEDY
+
+
+"But, of course," said Charles Rann Kennedy, violently (he says most
+things rather violently), "you understand that the war's most important
+effect on literature was clearly evident long before the war began!"
+
+I did not understand this statement, and said so. Thereupon the author
+of _The Servant in the House_ and _The Terrible Meek_ said:
+
+"We have so often been told that great events cast their shadows before,
+that the tremendous truth of the phrase has ceased to impress us. The
+war which began in August, 1914, exercised a tremendous influence over
+the mind of the world in 1913, 1912, 1911, and 1910. The great wave of
+religious thought which swept over Europe and America during those years
+was caused by the approach of the war. The tremendous pacifist
+movement--not the weak, bloodless pacifism of the poltroon, but the
+heroic, flaming pacifism of the soldier-hearted convinced of sin--was a
+protest against the menacing injustice of the war; it was the world's
+shudder of dread.
+
+"The literature of the first decade of the twentieth century was more
+thoroughly and obviously influenced by the war than will be that of the
+decade following. Think of that amazing quickening of the conscience of
+the French nation, a quickening which found expression in the novels of
+Réné Bazin, the immortal ballads of Francis Jammes, and in the work of
+countless other writers! These people were preparing themselves and
+their fellow-countrymen for the mighty ordeal which was before them.
+
+"It is blasphemous to say that the war can only affect things that come
+after it; to say that is to attempt to limit the powers of God. There
+are, of course, some writers who can only feel the influence of a thing
+after it has become evident; after they have carefully studied and
+absorbed it. But there are others, the manikoi, the prophetic madmen,
+who are swayed by what is to happen rather than by what has happened.
+I'm one of them.
+
+"The war held me in its spell long before the German troops crossed
+Belgian soil. I wrote my _The Terrible Meek_ by direct inspiration from
+heaven in Holy Week, 1912.
+
+"I put that in," said Mr. Kennedy (who looks very much like Gilbert K.
+Chesterton's _Man-alive_), suddenly breaking off the thread of his
+discourse, "not only because I know that it is the absolute truth, but
+because of the highly entertaining way in which it is bound to be
+misinterpreted.
+
+"New York's dramatic critics, the Lord Chamberlain of England, the
+military authorities of Germany and Great Britain--all these people were
+charmingly unanimous in finding _The Terrible Meek_ blasphemous,
+villainous, poisonous. Even the New York MacDowell Club, after two
+stormy debates, decided to omit all mention of _The Terrible Meek_ from
+its bulletin. Perhaps this was not entirely because the play was
+'sacrilegious'; the club may possibly have been influenced by the fact
+that its author was a loud person with long hair, who told unpleasant
+truths in reputable gatherings. And copies of the published book of the
+play, which were accompanied by friendly letters from the author, were
+refused by every monarch now at war in Europe!
+
+"But in 1914 and 1915 _The Terrible Meek_ suddenly found, to its own
+amazement, that it had become a respectable play! Its connection with
+the present war became evident. It has been the subject of countless
+leading articles; it has been read, and even acted, in thousands of
+churches. On the occasion of the first production of the despised play
+in New York City, my wife and I received a small pot of roses from a
+girls' school which we sometimes visit. In due time this was planted by
+the porch of our summer home in Connecticut. This year--three years only
+after its planting--the rose-tree covers three-quarters of the big
+porch, and last summer it bore thousands of blooms. Now these things are
+a parable!
+
+"No, the Lord does not have to wait until the beginnings of mighty wars
+for them vitally to influence the literature of the world. Upon some of
+us He places the burden of the coming horror years before.
+
+"Although I am and always have been violently opposed to war, I cannot
+help observing what this war has already commenced to do for literature.
+It is killing Supermanism--and I purposely call it by that name to
+distinguish it from the mere actual doctrine that Nietzsche may or may
+not have taught. The damnable heresy, as it historically happened among
+us, was already beginning to influence very badly most of our young
+writers. Clever devilism caught the trick of it too easily. Now, heresy
+is sin always and everywhere; and this heresy was a particularly black
+and deadly kind of sin. It ate into the very heart of our life.
+
+"And yet there was a reason, almost an excuse, for the power which the
+Superman idea got over the minds of writers after Bernard Shaw's first
+brilliant and engaging popularization of it. And the excuse is that
+Supermanism, with its emphasis on strength and courage and life, was to
+a great extent a healthy and almost inevitable reaction from the maudlin
+milk-and-water sort of theology and morals that had been apologetically
+handed out to us by weak-kneed religious teachers.
+
+"We had too much of the 'gentle Jesus' of the Sunday-school. In our maze
+of evil Protestantisms, we had lost sight of the real Son of God who is
+Jesus Christ. We had lost the terrible and lovely doctrine of the wrath
+of the Lamb.
+
+"And so a great many writers turned to Supermanism with a shout of
+relief. They were sick of milk and water, and this seemed to be strong
+wine. But Supermanism is heresy, and it rapidly spread over the world,
+most perniciously influencing all intellectual life.
+
+"And there were so many things to help Supermanism! There was the
+general acceptance of the doctrine of biological necessity as an
+argument for war--Bernhardi actually used that phrase, I believe--the
+idea that affairs of the spirit are determined exteriorly. There was the
+acceptance of various extraordinary interpretations of Darwin's theory
+of evolution! Every little man called himself a scientist, and took his
+own little potterings-about very seriously. Everything had to be a
+matter of observation, these little fellows said; they would believe
+only what they saw. They didn't know that real scientists always begin
+_a priori_, that real scientists always know the truth first and then
+set about to prove it.
+
+"Well, all these people helped the heresy of Supermanism along. But the
+people who helped it along chiefly were the apologetic Christians, who
+should have combated it with fire and sword. It was helped along by the
+sort of Christian who calls himself 'liberal' and 'progressive,' the
+sort of Christian who says, 'Of course, I'm not orthodox.' When any one
+says that to me, I always answer him in the chaste little way which so
+endears me to my day and generation: 'Hell, aren't you? I hope I am!'
+
+"This sort of so-called Christian helps Supermanism in two ways. In the
+first place, the 'progressive' Christians are great connoisseurs of
+heresy, they simply love any new sort of blasphemous philosophy, whether
+it comes from Germany or Upper Tooting. They love to try to assimilate
+all the new mad and wicked ideas, and graft them on Christianity. I
+suppose it's their idea of making the Lord Jesus Christ up to date and
+attractive. They love to try to engrave pretty patterns on the Rock of
+Ages. And Supermanism was to them a new and alluring pattern.
+
+"Of course a Supermanism might be worked out on strictly Christian
+lines, the Superman in that case being the Christ. But that is not the
+way in which the theory has historically worked out. No! Mr. Superman as
+we've actually known him in the world recently is the Beast that was
+taken, and with him the false prophets that wrought miracles before him,
+with which he had deceived them that had received the mark of the Beast
+and them that had worshiped his image. And these, in the terrible
+symbolism of St. John, you will remember, got fire and brimstone for
+their pains! As now!
+
+"Then there was your Christian Supermanism that tried to get up a weak
+little imitation of the wrath of the Lamb. This was your bastard by
+theatricality and popularity out of so-called muscular Christianity. Not
+the virile 'muscular Christianity' of Charles Kingsley, mind you--a
+power he won almost alone, by blood and tears; but the 'safe' thing of
+the after generation, the 'all things to all men'--when success was well
+assured. This is your baseball Christianity, the Christianity of the
+'punch,' of the piled-up heap of dollars, of the commercially counted
+'conversions' and the rest of the blasphemies! Christ deliver us from
+it, if needs be, even by fire!
+
+"Well, Supermanism cast its shadow over all forms of literary
+expression. The big and the little mockers all fell under its
+spell--they had their fling at Christianity in their novels, their
+plays, their poems. In the novel Supermanism was evident not so much in
+direct attacks on Christianity as in a brutal and pitiless realism.
+Perhaps some of this hard realism was a natural reaction from the
+eye-piping sentimentality of some of the Victorian writers. But most of
+it was merely Supermanism in fiction--pessimism, egotism, fatalism,
+cruelty.
+
+"One thing to be said for the Christian Scientists, the Mental Healers,
+the New Thought people generally, is that they did a real service
+through all this bad time by refusing to recognize any such heresy as
+biological determination as applied to things spiritual. They really did
+teach man's freedom up there in the heavens where he properly belongs.
+They refused to be bound by the earth, and all the appearances and the
+exterior causes thereof. Their Superman, if they ever used the phrase,
+was at least the Healer, the spirit spent for others, not for self.
+
+"If you were to ask me what were the war's most conspicuous effects on
+literature just at present, I would say conviction of sin, repentance
+and turning to God. There can be no suggestion of Supermanism in our
+literature now. We have rediscovered the Christian Virtues. If a man
+writes something about blond-beasting through the world for his own
+good, all we have to do is to stick up in front of his eyes a crucifix.
+For the world has seen courage and self-abnegation of the kind that
+Christ taught--it has seen men throw their lives away. The war has
+shown the world that the man who will throw away his life is braver and
+stronger and greater than the man who plunges forward to safety over the
+lives of others. The world has learned that he who loses his life shall
+gain it.
+
+"The war has thrown a clear light upon Christianity, and now all the
+little apologetic 'progressive' Christians see that the world had never
+reacted against orthodox Christianity as such, but only against the
+bowelless unbelief which masqueraded as Christianity. We have had so
+many ministers who talked about Christ as they would have talked about
+kippered herrings--even with less enthusiasm. But now any one who speaks
+or writes about Christianity after this will have to know that he has to
+do with something terribly real.
+
+"Of course, during the war the only people who can write about it are
+those who are in the red-hot period of youth. Young men of genius write
+in times of stress. The war forces genius to flower prematurely--that is
+how we got the noble sonnets of Rupert Brooke.
+
+"And after the war will come to the making of literature the man who has
+conquered pain and agony. And that is the real Superman, the Christian
+Superman, the Superman who has always been the normal ideal of the
+world. Carlyle's Superman was nearer the truth than was Nietzsche's, for
+Carlyle's Superman idea was grounded in courage and sacrifice and love;
+his Superman was some one worth fighting for and dying for. And the war
+is showing us that this is the true Superman, if we want to save the
+world for nobler ends.
+
+"And the war, I believe, will do away with the tommy-rotten objection to
+'message' in literature. Don't misunderstand me. Of course, we all
+object to the stupid 'story with a purpose' in the Sunday-school sense
+of that phrase. We don't want literature used as a sugar-coating around
+the illuminating lesson that God loves little Willie because he fed the
+dicky-birds and didn't say 'damn'! Yet we want literature to awake again
+and be as always in the great days--a message. Literature must be a
+direct message from the heart of the author to the heart of the world.
+The _Prometheus Vinctus_ was such a message. So also the _Antigone_. All
+Greek drama was.
+
+"All the little literary and artistic cults are dead or dying. The idea
+of literature as a thing distinct from life is dead. Writers can never
+again think of themselves as a race separate from the rest of humanity.
+All the artificial Bohemias have been destroyed, and can never again
+exist; for now at last the new world is about to dawn. Christ is coming.
+
+"And yet this war has made evident the importance of literature. It has
+made words real again. It has shown that men cannot live forever on a
+lie, written or spoken. God has come upon us like a thief in the night,
+and He has judged by our words. Some of us He has turned to madness and
+the vain babblings of heathendom. I am no wild chauvinist; though a man,
+English-born, it gives me no joy to speak of Germans as Huns, and to
+heap up hate and indignation against them. Nor in my wildest flights of
+romanticism can I dream that an England yet possessing Lord Northcliffe
+and the present Government can be all that God might call delightful.
+Mr. Superman has invaded England right enough, that I sadly know; and
+Prussianism is not all in Potsdam.
+
+"Yet it is significant, in view of the Superman's birthplace, in view of
+the fact that the German people have very largely accepted his doctrine
+and ideal, that the men who stand for speech among them, in their public
+manifestoes have been delivered over unto confusion and a lie. The
+logician has been illogical, the literary artist rendered without form
+and void. Their very craft has turned to impotence and self-destruction.
+I repeat, this is no happiness to me. Rather, I think of the Germany I
+have loved, and I weep for the pity of it all. I am no friend of kings
+and kaisers and bankers and grocers and titled newspaper editors, that I
+should make their bloodiness mine. But I cannot help but see the sign of
+God written across the heavens in words of living fire.
+
+"As I said in _The Terrible Meek_: 'There is great power in words. All
+the things that ever get done in the world, good or bad, are done by
+words.'
+
+"What we'll have to rediscover is that literature, like life, begins
+with the utterance of a word. And until people realize once again that a
+word is no mere dead thing buried in a dictionary, but the actual,
+awful, wonderful Life of God Himself, we shall neither have nor deserve
+to have a literature!"
+
+
+
+
+_THE MASQUE AND DEMOCRACY_
+
+PERCY MACKAYE
+
+
+The community masque, _Caliban by the Yellow Sands_, is primarily
+intended to honor the memory of Shakespeare on the three-hundredth
+anniversary of his death. But its significance goes further than the
+purpose of commemoration. Mr. Percy MacKaye, the author, tells me that
+he sees his masque as part of a movement which shall bring poetry to the
+service of the entire community, which shall make poetry democratic, in
+the best sense of the word, and that the result of this movement will be
+to create conditions likely to produce out of the soil of America a
+great renascence of the drama.
+
+Mr. MacKaye undoubtedly is the busiest poet in the United States of
+America. When he talked to me about the significance of the community
+masque, rehearsals of the various groups that are to take part in it
+were going on all over the city. Every few minutes he was called away
+to confer with some of the directors of the masque, or some of the
+actors taking part in it. For a while Mr. John Drew was with us, talking
+of his appearance, in the character of Shakespeare, in epilogue. Mr.
+Robert Edmund Jones, the designer of the inner scenes, brought over some
+new drawings, and there were telephone conversations about music and
+costumes and other important details of the monster production.
+
+"The fact," said Mr. MacKaye, "that the masque is a poem primarily
+intended to be heard rather than to be read, is itself a movement toward
+the earlier and more democratic uses of poetry. Poetry appeals
+essentially to the ear, and is an art of the spoken word, yet, on
+account of our conditions of life, the written word is considered
+poetry.
+
+"This was not true in Shakespeare's time. And in the sort of work that I
+am doing is shown a return to the old ideal. A masque is a poem that can
+be visualized and acted. First of all it must be a poem, otherwise it
+cannot be anything but a more or less warped work of art.
+
+"With much of the new movement in the theater I am heartily in sympathy;
+but the movement seems to me one-sided. A large part of it has to do
+with visualization. Emphasis is laid on the appeal to the eye rather
+than the appeal to the ear, because the men of genius, like Gordon
+Craig, who have been leaders in the movement, have been interested in
+that phase of dramatic presentation.
+
+"Now I think that this one-sidedness is regrettable. When Gordon Craig
+called his book on dramatic visualization _The Art of the Theater_ he
+was wrong. He should have called it 'An Art of the Theater.'
+
+"These men have neglected part of the human soul. They have forgotten
+that the greatest part of the appeal of a drama is to the ear. The ear
+brings up the most subtle of all life's associations and connotations.
+By means of the ear the motions and ideas are conjured up in the mind of
+the audience.
+
+"Now, while the new movement in the theater is visual in character, the
+new movement in poetry is, so to speak, audible. The American poets are
+insisting more and more on the importance of the spoken word in poetry,
+as distinct from its shadow on the printed page. Whether they write
+_vers libre_ or the usual rhymed forms, they appreciate the fact that
+they must write poems that will be effective when read aloud. Surely
+this is a wholesome movement, likely to tend more and more toward
+definite dramatic expression on the part of the poets, whether to
+audiences through actors on the stage, or to audiences gathered to hear
+the direct utterances of the poets themselves.
+
+"This being so, the stage tending more toward visualization, and poetry
+tending more and more toward the spoken word, where shall we look for
+the co-ordinating development? I think that we shall find it in the
+community masque. The community masque draws out of the unlabored and
+untrammeled resources of our national life its inspiration and its
+theme. It requires our young poets to get closely in touch with our
+national life, with our history and with contemporary attitudes and
+ideals. To do this it is first of all necessary to have the poetic
+vision. The great need of the day is of the poet trained in the art of
+the theater.
+
+"The pageant and the masque offer the ideal conditions for the rendering
+of poetry. The poet who writes the lyric may or may not ordinarily be
+the one to speak it. In the masque the one who speaks the poem is the
+one chosen to do so because of his special fitness for the task. I have
+chosen my actors for the Shakespeare masque with special reference to
+their ability to speak poetry."
+
+"But what has this to do," I asked, "with making poetry more
+democratic?"
+
+"For one thing," Mr. MacKaye answered, "it gives the poet a larger
+audience. People who never read poetry will listen to poetry when it is
+presented to them in dramatic form. I have found that the result of the
+presentation of a community masque is to interest in poetry a large
+number of people who had hitherto been deaf to its appeal. In St. Louis,
+when I started a masque, that queer word with a 'q' in it was understood
+by a comparatively small number. But after the masque was produced
+nearly every high-school boy and girl in the town was writing masques.
+
+"No one can observe the progress of the community masque without seeing
+that it is surely a most democratic art form. I read my St. Louis masque
+before assemblies of ministers, in negro high schools, before clubs of
+advertising-men, at I. W. W. meetings--before men of all conditions of
+life and shades of opinion. It afforded them a sort of spiritual and
+intellectual meeting-place, it gave them a common interest. Surely that
+is a democratic function.
+
+"The democracy of the masque was forcefully brought to my attention
+again at the recent dinner by Otto Kahn to the Mayor's Honorary
+Committee for the New York Shakespeare Celebration. After James M. Beck
+had made a speech, Morris Hillquit, also a member of the committee,
+arose and addressed the company. He pointed out more clearly than I have
+heard it done before that in this cause extremes of opinion met, that
+art was producing practical democracy.
+
+"And yet," said Mr. MacKaye, hastily, "the masque stands for the
+democracy of excellence, not the democracy of mediocrity. What is art
+but self-government, the harmonizing of the elements of the mind? There
+can be no art where there is no discipline, there can be no art where
+there is not a high standard of excellence.
+
+"As I said," he continued, "the original appeal of poetry was to the ear
+as well as to the eye. In the days when poetry was a more democratic art
+than it has been in our time and that of our fathers, the poet spoke his
+poems to a circle of enthralled listeners. The masque is spoken through
+many mouths, but it might be spoken or chanted by the bard himself.
+
+"There has never before been so great an opportunity for the revival of
+the poetic drama. Ordinarily when a poetic drama is presented the cast
+has been drawn from actors trained in the rendition of prose. Inevitably
+the tendency has been for them to give a prose value to the lines of
+poetry. In selecting a cast for a masque, special attention is given to
+the ability of the actors to speak poetry, so the poem is presented as
+the poet intended.
+
+"It may be that the pageant and masque movement represents the full
+flowering of the renascence of poetry which all observers of
+intellectual events have recognized. But these movements are perennial;
+I do not like to think of a renascence of poetry because I do not think
+that poetry has been dead. I feel that it is desirable for the poets to
+become aware of the opportunities presented to them by the masque, the
+opportunities to combine the art of poetry with the art of the theater,
+and thus put poetry at the service of mankind.
+
+"I have felt that the Poetry Society of America, an organization whose
+activities certainly are stimulating and encouraging to every friend of
+the art, might serve poetry better if its members were to place more
+emphasis on creation and less on criticism. At their meetings now
+criticism is the dominant note. Poems written by the members are read
+aloud and criticized from the floor. This is excellent, in its place,
+but its effect is to lay stress on the critical function of the poet,
+which, after all, is not his main function. What the members of the
+Poetry Society should do is to seek co-operatively to create something.
+And for this the masque offers them a golden opportunity.
+
+"The flowering of poetry is a thing of infinite variety. There must be
+variety in a masque if the masque is to continue to be a worthy and
+popular art form. Standardization would be fatal to the masque, and I
+have stood out against it with all the power I possess. The masque and
+the pageant must not degenerate into traveling shows, done according to
+a fixed receipt. There must be the vision in it, and when the people see
+the vision they respond marvelously."
+
+Percy MacKaye is the son of Steele MacKaye, the author of _Hazel Kirke_
+and other popular plays. From the very beginning of his literary career
+his chief ambition has seemed to be to bring about a closer
+_rapprochement_ between poetry and the drama.
+
+When Mr. MacKaye was graduated from Harvard, in 1897, there were in that
+university no courses, technical or otherwise, in the modern drama. The
+official acceptance of his own commencement part _On the Need of
+Imagination in the Drama of To-day_ was the first official sanction of
+the subject, which was commented upon by the _Boston Transcript_ as
+something unprecedented in the annals of university discussion,
+especially of Harvard. It was not until seven or eight years had passed
+that Prof. George P. Baker began his courses in dramatic technique.
+
+The development of the pageant and the masque has been for years the
+object of Mr. MacKaye's tireless endeavors. He has spoken of the masque
+as "the potential drama of democracy." Two years ago in St. Louis he had
+his first technical opportunity on a large scale to experiment in
+devising this sort of communal entertainment. There, during five
+performances, witnessed by half a million people, some seven thousand
+citizens of St. Louis took part in his masque, in association with the
+pageant by Thomas Wood Stevens.
+
+"The outgoing cost of the St. Louis production," said Mr. MacKaye, "was
+$122,000; the income, $139,000. The balance of $17,000 has been devoted
+to a fund for civic art. If these seem large sums, we must look back to
+the days of the classic Greek drama and remember that the cost of
+producing a single play by Sophocles at Athens was $500,000.
+
+"The St. Louis production was truly a drama of, for, and by the people,
+a true community masque. _Caliban by the Yellow Sands_ is a community
+masque, given as the central popular expression of some hundreds of
+supplementary Shakespearian celebrations.
+
+"I call this work a masque, because it is a dramatic work of symbolism,
+involving in its structure pageantry, poetry, and the dance. But I have
+not thought to relate its structure to a historic form; I have simply
+sought by its structure to solve a problem of the art of the theater.
+That problem is the new one of creating a focus of dramatic technique
+for the growing but groping movement vaguely called 'pageantry,' which
+is itself a vital sign of social evolution--the half-desire of the
+people not merely to remain receptive to a popular art created by
+specialists, but to take part themselves in creating it; the
+desire,--that is, of democracy consistently to seek expression through
+a drama of and by the people, not merely for the people.
+
+"Six years ago, after the pageant-masque of the city of Gloucester,
+Massachusetts, I wrote, in _Scribner's Magazine_, an article in which I
+said that I found in the three American pageant-masques which I had seen
+recently, the Gloucester Pageant, the Masque at Aspet, and the
+California Redwood Festival, the expression of community spirit focused
+by co-operating artists in dramatic form. I said then, what I feel even
+more strongly after my work with the St. Louis Pageant and the
+Shakespearian Masque, that pageantry is poetry for the masses.
+
+"The parade of Election Day, the processions of Antics and Horribles on
+the Fourth of July and Thanksgiving Day, the May-Queen rituals of
+children--these make an elemental appeal to every one. What is this
+elemental appeal? Is it not the appeal of symbolism, the expression of
+life's meanings in sensuous form? Crude though it may be, pageantry
+satisfies an elemental instinct for art, a popular demand for poetry.
+This instinct and this demand, like other human instincts and demands,
+may be educated, refined, developed into a mighty agency of
+civilization. Refinement of this deep, popular instinct will result
+from a rational selection in correlation of the elements of pageantry.
+Painting, dancing, music, and sculpture (the last as applied to classic
+groupings) are appropriately the special arts for selecting those
+elements, and drama is the special art of correlating them.
+
+"The form of pageantry most popular and impressive in appeal as a fine
+art is that of the dramatic pageant, or masque. It is not limited to
+historic themes. All vital modern forces and institutions of our nation
+might appropriately find symbolic expression in the masque.
+
+"And in this would be seen the making of art democratic. Thus would the
+art of poetry and the art of the drama be put at the service of mankind.
+Artistic gifts, which now are individualized and dispersed, would be
+organized to express the labors and aspirations of communities,
+reviving, for the noblest humanism of our own times, the traditions of
+Leonardo da Vinci, Ben Jonson, and Inigo Jones. The development of the
+art of public masques, dedicated to civic education, would do more than
+any other agency to provide popular symbolic form and tradition for the
+stuff of a noble national drama. The present theaters cannot develop a
+public art, since they are dedicated to a private speculative business.
+The association of artists and civic leaders in the organization of
+public masques would tend gradually to establish a civic theater, owned
+by the people and conducted by artists, in every city of the nation.
+
+"I expressed these ideas," said Mr. MacKaye, "some years ago, before the
+pageant movement had reached its present pitch of popularity. All my
+experiences since that time have given me a firmer conviction that the
+masque is the drama of democracy, and I believe that the chief value of
+the Shakespearian masque is as a step forward in the progress of the
+co-operative dramatic and poetic expression of the people.
+
+"_Caliban by the Yellow Sands_ will be given at the City College Stadium
+May 23d, 24th, 25th, 26th, and 27th. After its New York performance it
+will be available for production elsewhere on a modified scale of stage
+performance. After June 1st it is planned that a professional company,
+which will co-operate with the local communities, will take the masque
+on tour.
+
+"The subtitle of _Caliban by the Yellow Sands_ is _A Community Masque of
+the Art of the Theater_, _Devised and Written to Commemorate the
+Tercentenary of the Death of Shakespeare_. The dramatic-symbolic motive
+of the masque I have taken from Scene 2 of Act I of _The Tempest_, where
+Prospero says:
+
+ It was mine art
+ When I arrived and heard thee, that made gape
+ The pine and let thee out.
+
+"The art of Prospero I have conceived as the art of Shakespeare in its
+universal scope--that many-visioned art of the theater, which age after
+age has come to liberate the imprisoned imagination of mankind from the
+fetters of brute force and ignorance; that same art which, being usurped
+or stifled by groping part-knowledge, prudery, or lust, has been botched
+in its ideal aims, and has wrought havoc, hypocrisy, and decadence.
+Caliban is in this masque that passionate child-curious part of us all,
+groveling close to his origin, yet groping up toward that serener plane
+of pity and love, reason, and disciplined will, on which Miranda and
+Prospero commune with Ariel and his spirits.
+
+"The theme of the masque--Caliban seeking to learn the art of
+Prospero--is, of course, the slow education of mankind through the
+influences of co-operative art--that is, of the art of the theater in
+its full social scope. This theme of co-operation is expressed earliest
+in the masque through the lyric of Ariel's Spirits taken from _The
+Tempest_; it is sounded, with central stress, in the chorus of peace
+when the kings clasp hands on the Field of the Cloth of Gold; and, with
+final emphasis, in the gathering together of the creative forces of
+dramatic art in the Epilogue.
+
+"So I have tried to make the masque bring that message of co-operation
+which I think all true art should bring. And the masque is the form
+which seems to me destined to bring about this desired co-operation, to
+bring back, perhaps, the conditions which existed in the spacious days
+of the great Greek drama. The growth in popularity of masques and
+pageants is preparing the way for a new race of poet dramatists, of
+poets who will use their knowledge of the art of the theater to
+interpret the people to themselves. And out of this new artistic
+democracy will come, let us hope, our new national poetry and our new
+national drama."
+
+THE END
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+
+
+TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES
+
+
+The duplicate book title and chapter titles have been removed. Also the
+following misprints have been corrected:
+
+ TOC: put in "Tippecanoe" without a hyphen (in "Tippecanoe
+ County, Indiana")
+
+ TOC: "Mackaye" changed to "MacKaye", as in all other instances
+ ("Percy Mackaye was born in New York City...")
+
+ p. 56: "countinent" changed to "continent" ("Yet in their time
+ these men set the whole countinent in a roar.")
+
+ p. 75: period is added after the middle initial W (ROBERT W.
+ CHAMBERS)
+
+ p. 78: period is added the following sentence: The most
+ imaginative and fantastic romances must have their basis in real
+ life.
+
+ p. 107: put in "dive-keeper" with a hyphen (no other instance in
+ the text)
+
+ p. 112: put in "soulless" without a hyphen (no other instances
+ in the text)
+
+ p. 178: opening double quote changed to single quote ('If ye had
+ not plowed with my heifer....)
+
+ p. 218: put in "catch-words" with a hyphen (no other instances
+ in the text)
+
+ p. 243: put in "motion-picture" with a hyphen (no other
+ instances in the text)
+
+ p. 247: put in "off-hand" with a hyphen ("I can think off-hand
+ of quite a group of writers....")
+
+ p. 283: put in "Dooryards" without a hyphen ("When Lilacs Last
+ in Dooryards Bloomed")
+
+ p. 293: put in "everywhere" without a hyphen ("heresy is sin
+ always and everywhere;")
+
+ p. 294: "Of couse" changed to "Of course" ("Of course, I'm not
+ orthodox.")
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Literature in the Making, by Various
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LITERATURE IN THE MAKING ***
+
+***** This file should be named 34313-8.txt or 34313-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/3/1/34313/
+
+Produced by Elizaveta Shevyakhova, Suzanne Shell and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
+(This file was produced from images generously made
+available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/34313-8.zip b/34313-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cacc6e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34313-8.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/34313-h.zip b/34313-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0d96b15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34313-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/34313-h/34313-h.htm b/34313-h/34313-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..698f29c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34313-h/34313-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,8683 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<!-- $Id: header.txt 236 2009-12-07 18:57:00Z vlsimpson $ -->
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of Literature in the Making, by Joyce Kilmer.
+ </title>
+ <style type="text/css">
+
+body {
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+p {
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+}
+
+hr {
+ width: 33%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+table {
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+}
+
+.pagenum {position: absolute; left: 92%;
+ font-size: 75%; text-indent: 0em;
+ border-top: solid gray 1px; border-bottom: solid gray 1px;
+ background-color: inherit; font-weight: normal;
+ font-style: normal; font-variant: normal;
+ text-decoration: none;}
+
+.blockquot {
+ margin-left: 5%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+
+.center {text-align: center;}
+
+.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
+
+.u {text-decoration: underline;}
+
+.caption {font-weight: bold;}
+
+/* Images */
+.figcenter {
+ margin: auto;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+/* Poetry */
+.poem {
+ margin-left:30%;
+ margin-right:10%;
+ text-align: left;
+}
+
+.poem br {display: none;}
+
+.poem .stanza {margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;}
+
+.poem span.i0 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 0em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i2 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 2em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i4 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 4em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i8 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 8em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;
+}
+
+.poem span.i18 {
+ display: block;
+ margin-left: 18em;
+ padding-left: 3em;
+ text-indent: -3em;}
+
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Literature in the Making, by Various
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Literature in the Making
+ by some of its makers
+
+Author: Various
+
+Editor: Joyce Kilmer
+
+Release Date: November 13, 2010 [EBook #34313]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LITERATURE IN THE MAKING ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Elizaveta Shevyakhova, Suzanne Shell and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
+(This file was produced from images generously made
+available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 389px;">
+<img src="images/tp.png" width="389" height="600" alt="Title page" title="Title page" />
+</div>
+
+
+
+<h1>LITERATURE<br />
+IN THE MAKING</h1>
+
+
+
+<h3>BY</h3>
+
+<h2>SOME OF ITS MAKERS</h2>
+
+
+
+<h4>PRESENTED BY</h4>
+
+<h2>JOYCE KILMER</h2>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 109px;">
+<img src="images/coverill.png" width="109" height="125" alt="One hand passes a staff to another hand" title="One hand passes a staff to another hand" />
+</div>
+
+
+
+<h3>HARPER &amp; BROTHERS</h3>
+
+<h4>NEW YORK AND LONDON</h4>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+
+
+<h6>Literature in the Making</h6>
+
+<p class="center"><small>Copyright, 1917, by Harper &amp; Brothers<br />
+Printed in the United States of America<br />
+Published April, 1917
+</small></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<h5>TO</h5>
+<h4>LOUIS BEVIER, PH.D., LITT.D.</h4>
+<h5>AND</h5>
+<h4>LOUIS BEVIER, JR.</h4>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+
+
+<h2>CONTENTS</h2>
+
+<div class="left">
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align="left">&nbsp;</td><td align="right"><small>PAGE</small></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_3">WAR STOPS LITERATURE</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_3">3</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>WILLIAM DEAN HOWELLS</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>William Dean Howells, the foremost American novelist
+of his generation, was born at Martin's Ferry, Ohio,
+March 11, 1837. Most of his many novels have been
+realistic and sympathetic studies of contemporary American
+life. For some years he has written "The Editor's
+Easy Chair" in <i>Harper's Magazine</i>. He has received
+honorary degrees from Harvard, Yale, Oxford, and Columbia,
+and in 1915 the National Institute of Arts and Letters
+awarded him its Gold Medal "For distinguished work
+in fiction." <i>The Daughter of the Storage</i> and <i>Years of My
+Youth</i> are his latest books.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_19">THE JOYS OF THE POOR</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_19">19</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>KATHLEEN NORRIS</small></td></tr>
+
+
+<tr><td>Kathleen Norris was born in San Francisco, California,
+July 16, 1880. She is the wife of Charles Gilman Norris,
+himself a writer and the brother of the late Frank Norris.
+Among Mrs. Norris's best-known novels are <i>Mother,
+The Story of Julia Page</i>, and <i>The Heart of Rachel</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_35">NATIONAL PROSPERITY AND ART</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_35">35</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>BOOTH TARKINGTON</small></td></tr>
+
+
+
+
+<tr><td>Booth Tarkington was born in Indianapolis, Indiana,
+July 29, 1869. A prolific and brilliant writer, he has
+scored many successes of different types, being the author
+of the romantic drama <i>Monsieur Beaucaire</i>, and of many
+novels dealing with contemporary Middle-Western life.
+Recently he has, in <i>Seventeen</i> and the "Penrod" stories,
+given his attention to the comedies and tragedies of
+American youth.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_45">ROMANTICISM AND AMERICAN HUMOR</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_45">45</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>MONTAGUE GLASS</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Montague Glass was born at Manchester, England, July
+23, 1877. Coming in his youth to the United States,
+he brought into American fiction a new type&mdash;that of
+the metropolitan Jewish-American business man. His
+<i>Potash and Perlmutter</i> and <i>Abe and Mawruss</i> have given
+him a European as well as an American reputation.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_63">THE "MOVIES" BENEFIT LITERATURE</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_63">63</a></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="right"><small>REX BEACH</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Rex Beach was born at Atwood, Michigan, September 1,
+1877. His novels deal chiefly with the West and the
+North, and his favorite theme is adventurous life in the
+open. Among his best-known books are <i>The Spoilers</i>,
+<i>The Silver Horde</i>, and <i>Rainbow's End</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_75">WHAT IS GENIUS?</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_75">75</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>ROBERT W. CHAMBERS</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Robert W. Chambers was born in Brooklyn, New York,
+May 26, 1865. One of the most widely read writers of
+his time, he has given his attention chiefly to English
+and American society, making it the theme of a large
+number of novels, among which may be mentioned
+<i>The Fighting Chance</i>, <i>Japonette</i>, and <i>Athalie</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_89">DETERIORATION OF THE SHORT STORY</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_89">89</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>JAMES LANE ALLEN</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>James Lane Allen was born near Lexington, Kentucky,
+in 1849. In 1886 he gave up his profession of teaching
+to devote his attention to literature. Many of his novels
+deal with the South. Of them perhaps <i>The Kentucky
+Cardinal</i> and <i>The Choir Invisible</i> are best known.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_101">SOME HARMFUL INFLUENCES</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>HARRY LEON WILSON</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Harry Leon Wilson was born in Oregon, Illinois, May
+1, 1867. He was co-author with Booth Tarkington of
+<i>The Man from Home</i>, and his <i>Bunker Bean</i> and <i>Ruggles
+of Red Gap</i> have given him a great reputation for irresistible
+and peculiarly American humor.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_119">THE PASSING OF THE SNOB</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_119">119</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>EDWARD S. MARTIN</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Edward Sandford Martin was born in Willowbrook,
+Owasco, New York, January 2, 1856. His keen yet
+sympathetic observation of modern life finds expression
+in essays, many of which have been used editorially in
+<i>Life</i>. Several volumes of his essays have been published,
+among which may be mentioned <i>The Luxury of
+Children, and Some Other Luxuries</i> and <i>Reflections of a
+Beginning Husband.</i><br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_131">COMMERCIALIZING THE SEX INSTINCT</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_131">131</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>ROBERT HERRICK</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Robert Herrick was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts,
+April 26, 1868. He has been until recently a professor
+at the University of Chicago. He is a critic and a writer
+of realistic novels. <i>The Web of Life</i>, <i>The Common Lot</i>,
+<i>Together</i>, and <i>Clark's Field</i> are novels that show Mr.
+Herrick's questioning attitude toward some modern
+social institutions.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_145">SIXTEEN DON'TS FOR POETS</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_145">145</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>ARTHUR GUITERMAN</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Arthur Guiterman was born of American parents in
+Vienna, Austria, November 28, 1871. He is a writer of
+deft and humorous light verse, of which a volume was
+recently published under the title <i>The Laughing Muse</i>.
+He contributes a weekly rhymed review to <i>Life</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_157">MAGAZINES CHEAPEN FICTION</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_157">157</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>GEORGE BARR McCUTCHEON</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>George Barr McCutcheon was born on a farm in Tippecanoe
+County, Indiana, July 26, 1866. He is a short-story
+writer and novelist, devoting himself chiefly to tales of
+adventure. <i>Beverley of Graustark</i> and the volumes that
+succeeded it have gained him many admirers among
+lovers of romance.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_169">BUSINESS INCOMPATIBLE WITH ART</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_169">169</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>FRANK H. SPEARMAN</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Frank H. Spearman was born at Buffalo, New York,
+September 6, 1859. He is known both as a short-story
+writer and a writer of articles on economic topics. His
+novels are founded chiefly on themes dealing with the
+great industrial enterprises of the West, especially the
+railroads. The best known of these are <i>The Daughter
+of a Magnate</i> and <i>The Strategy of Great Railroads</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_187">THE NOVEL MUST GO</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_187">187</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>WILL N. HARBEN</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Will N. Harben, who was born in Dalton, Georgia, July 5,
+1858, began his career in business in the South. His
+entrance into literature began with the assistant editorship
+of the <i>Youth's Companion</i>. He had gained a distinctive
+place as an interpreter of phases of Southern life
+in the company which includes Cable, Harris, and Johnston.
+His novels include <i>Pole Baker</i>, <i>Ann Boyd</i>, <i>Second
+Choice</i>, and many others.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_199">LITERATURE IN THE COLLEGES</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_199">199</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>JOHN ERSKINE</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>John Erskine was born in New York City, October 5,
+1879. He is Adjunct Professor of English at Columbia
+University, the author of many text-books and critical
+works, of <i>Actæon and Other Poems</i> and of <i>The Moral
+Obligation to be Intelligent and Other Essays</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_213">CITY LIFE VERSUS LITERATURE</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_213">213</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>JOHN BURROUGHS</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>John Burroughs was born in Roxbury, New York, April
+3, 1837. He taught school in his early years, and held for
+a time a clerkship in the United States Treasury. Since
+1874 he has devoted himself to literature and fruit culture.
+Among his well-known "Nature" books may be
+noted <i>Wake Robin</i>, <i>Bird and Bough</i>, and <i>Camping and
+Tramping with Roosevelt</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_229">"EVASIVE IDEALISM" IN LITERATURE</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_229">229</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>ELLEN GLASGOW</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Ellen Glasgow was born in Richmond, Virginia, April
+22, 1874. Her novels, among which may be mentioned
+<i>The Voice of the People</i>, <i>The Romance of a Plain Man</i>, and
+<i>Life and Gabriella</i>, deal chiefly with social and psychological
+problems, and their scenes are for the most part in
+the southern part of the United States.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_241">"CHOCOLATE FUDGE" IN THE MAGAZINE</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_241">241</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>FANNIE HURST</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Fannie Hurst was born in St. Louis, October 19, 1889.
+She has served as a saleswoman and as a waitress and
+crossed the Atlantic in the steerage to get material for
+her short stories of the life of the working-woman, selections
+of which have been published with the titles <i>Just
+Around the Corner</i> and <i>Every Soul Hath Its Song</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_253">THE NEW SPIRIT IN POETRY</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_253">253</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>AMY LOWELL</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Amy Lowell was born in Brookline, Massachusetts,
+February 9, 1874. She is prominently identified with
+<i>vers libre</i>, <i>imagisme</i>, and other ultra-modern poetic tendencies.
+She has published a volume of essays on modern
+French poetry and three books of poems, of which <i>Men,
+Women, and Ghosts</i> is the most recent.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_265">A NEW DEFINITION OF POETRY</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_265">265</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>EDWIN ARLINGTON ROBINSON</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Edwin Arlington Robinson was born in Head Tide,
+Maine, December 22, 1869. He has written plays, but
+is chiefly known for his poems, most of them studies of
+character. His most recent volume is <i>Merlin: A Poem</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_277">LET POETRY BE FREE</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_277">277</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>JOSEPHINE PRESTON PEABODY</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Josephine Preston Peabody was born in New York City.
+She won the Stratford-on-Avon Prize for her poetic
+drama <i>The Piper</i>. She has published many books of
+verse, one of which, called <i>Harvest Moon</i>, deals chiefly
+with woman's tragic share in the Great War. She is the
+wife of Prof. Lionel Simeon Marks of Harvard.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_289">THE HERESY OF SUPERMANISM</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_289">289</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>CHARLES RANN KENNEDY</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Charles Rann Kennedy was born at Derby, England,
+February 14, 1871. His plays, dealing with social and
+religious questions, include <i>The Servant in the House</i>,
+<i>The Terrible Meek</i>, <i>The Idol-Breakers</i>, and <i>The Rib of
+the Man</i>, his latest work.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+
+<tr><td align="left"><i><a href="#Page_305">THE MASQUE AND DEMOCRACY</a></i></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_305">305</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right"><small>PERCY MACKAYE</small></td></tr>
+
+<tr><td>Percy MacKaye was born in New York City, March 16,
+1875. He has written many poems and plays, and has
+been especially identified with the production of community
+pageants and masques, having written and
+directed the St. Louis Civic Masque in 1914, and the
+Shakespeare Masque in New York City in 1916. Among
+his published works may be mentioned <i>The Scarecrow</i>,
+<i>Jeanne d'Arc</i>, <i>Sappho and Phaon</i> and <i>Anti-Matrimony</i>
+(plays) and <i>Uriel and Other Poems</i>.<br />&nbsp;</td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+
+
+
+<h2><a name="INTRODUCTION" id="INTRODUCTION"></a>INTRODUCTION</h2>
+
+
+<p>This book is an effort to bridge the gulf
+between literary theory and literary practice.
+In these days of specialization it is more than
+ever true that the man who lectures and writes
+about the craft of writing seldom has the time
+or the inclination to show, by actual work, that
+he can apply his principles. On the other hand,
+the successful novelist, poet, or playwright devotes
+himself to his craft and seldom attempts to
+analyze and display the methods by which he obtains
+his effect, or even to state his opinion on
+matters intellectual and æsthetic.</p>
+
+<p>Now, the professor of English and the literary
+critic are valuable members of society, and the
+development of literature owes much to their
+counsel and guardianship. But there is a special
+significance in the opinion which the writer holds
+concerning his own trade, in the advice which he
+bases upon his own experience, in the theory of
+life and art which he has formulated for himself.</p>
+
+<p>Therefore I have spent considerable time in
+talking with some of the most widely read authors
+of our day, and in obtaining from them frank
+and informal statements of their points of view.
+I have purposely refrained from confining myself
+to writers of any one school or type of mind&mdash;the
+dean of American letters and the most advanced
+of our newest poetical anarchists alike are represented
+in these pages. The authors have talked
+freely, realizing that this was an opportunity to
+set forth their views definitely and comprehensively.
+They have not the time to write or lecture
+about their art, but they are willing to talk
+about it.</p>
+
+<p>They knew that through me they spoke, in the
+first place, to the great army of readers of their
+books who have a natural and pleasing curiosity
+concerning the personality of the men and women
+who devote their lives to providing them with
+entertainment, and, in some cases, instruction.
+They knew that through me they spoke, in the
+second place, to all the literary apprentices of the
+country, who look eagerly for precept and example
+to those who have won fame by the delightful
+labor of writing. They knew that through
+me they spoke, in the third place, to critics and
+students of literature of our own generation and,
+perhaps, of those that shall come after us. How
+eagerly would we read, for instance, an interview
+with Francis Bacon on the question of the authorship
+of Shakespeare's plays, or an interview with
+Oliver Goldsmith in which he gave his real opinion
+of Dr. Johnson, Garrick, and Boswell! A century
+or so from now, some of the writers who in
+this book talk to the world may be the objects
+of curiosity as great.</p>
+
+<p>The writers who have talked with me received
+me with courtesy, gave me freely of their time
+and thought, and showed a sincere desire for the
+furtherance of the purpose of this book. To
+them, accordingly, I tender my gratitude for
+anything in these pages which the reader may
+find of interest or of value. Their explanations
+of their literary creeds and practices were furnished
+in the first instance for the <i>New York
+Times</i>, to which I desire to express my acknowledgments.</p>
+
+<p style="text-align:right"><span class="smcap">Joyce Kilmer.</span></p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">3</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h1>LITERATURE<br />
+IN THE MAKING</h1>
+
+<h2><i>WAR STOPS LITERATURE</i></h2>
+
+<h4>WILLIAM DEAN HOWELLS</h4>
+
+
+<p>War stops literature. This is the belief of
+a man who for more than a quarter of a
+century has been in the front rank of the world's
+novelists, who wrote <i>The Rise of Silas Lapham</i>
+and <i>A Modern Instance</i> and nearly a hundred
+other sympathetic interpretations of American
+life.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. William Dean Howells was the third writer
+to whom was put the question, "What effect will
+the Great War have on literature?" And he was
+the first to give a direct answer.</p>
+
+<p>A famous French dramatist replied: "I am not
+a prophet. I have enough to do to understand the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">4</a></span>
+present and the past; I cannot concern myself
+with the future." A famous English short-story
+writer said, "The war has already inspired some
+splendid poetry; it may also inspire great plays
+and novels, but, of course, we cannot tell as yet."</p>
+
+<p>But Mr. Howells said, quite simply, "War stops
+literature." He said it as unemotionally as if he
+were stating a familiar axiom.</p>
+
+<p>He does not consider it an axiom, however,
+for he supplied proof.</p>
+
+<p>"I have never believed," he said, "that great
+events produced great literature. They seldom
+call forth the great creative powers of man. In
+poetry it is not the poems of occasion that endure,
+but the poems that have come into being independently,
+not as the result of momentous happenings.</p>
+
+<p>"This war does not furnish the poet, the
+novelist, and the dramatist with the material of
+literature. For instance, the Germans, as every
+one will admit, have shown extraordinary valor.
+But we do not think of celebrating that valor in
+poetry; it does not thrill the modern writers as
+such valor thrilled the writers of bygone centuries.
+When we think of the valor of the Germans,
+our emotion is not admiration but pity.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">5</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"And the reason for this is that fighting is no
+longer our ideal. Fighting was not a great ideal,
+and therefore it is no longer our ideal. All that
+old material of literature&mdash;the clashing of swords,
+the thunder of shot and shell, the great clouds of
+smoke, the blood and fury&mdash;all this has gone out
+from literature. It is an anachronism."</p>
+
+<p>"But the American Civil War produced literature,
+did it not?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"What great literature did it produce?" asked
+Mr. Howells in turn. "As I look back over my
+life and recall to mind the great number of books
+that the Civil War inspired I find that I am
+thinking of things that the American people have
+forgotten. They did not become literature, these
+poems and stories that came in such quantities and
+seemed so important in the sixties.</p>
+
+<p>"There were the novels of J. W. De Forest, for
+instance. They were well written, they were interesting,
+they described some phases of the
+Civil War truthfully and vividly. We read them
+when they were written&mdash;but you probably have
+never heard of them. No one reads them now.
+They were literature, but that about which they
+were written has ceased to be of literary interest.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course, the Civil War, because of its peculiar<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">6</a></span>
+nature, was followed by an expansion, intellectual
+as well as social and economic. And this expansion
+undoubtedly had its beneficial effect on literature.
+But the Civil War itself did not have,
+could not have, literary expression.</p>
+
+<p>"Of all the writings which the Civil War directly
+inspired I can think of only one that has endured
+to be called literature. That is Lowell's 'Commemoration
+Ode.'</p>
+
+<p>"War stops literature. It is an upheaval of
+civilization, a return to barbarism; it means
+death to all the arts. Even the preparation for
+war stops literature. It stopped it in Germany
+years ago. A little anecdote is significant.</p>
+
+<p>"I was in Florence about 1883, long after the
+Franco-Prussian War, and there I met the editor
+of a great German literary weekly&mdash;I will not tell
+you its name or his. He was a man of refinement
+and education, and I have not forgotten his great
+kindness to my own fiction. One day I asked him
+about the German novelists of the day.</p>
+
+<p>"He said: 'There are no longer any German
+novelists worthy of the name. Our new ideal has
+stopped all that. Militarism is our new ideal&mdash;the
+ideal of Duty&mdash;and it has killed our imagination.
+So the German novel is dead.'"<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">7</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Why is it, then," I asked, "that Russia, a nation
+of militaristic ideals, has produced so many
+great novels during the past century?"</p>
+
+<p>"Russia is not Germany," answered the man
+who taught Americans to read Turgenieff. "The
+people of Russia are not militaristic as the people
+of Germany are militaristic. In Germany war
+has for a generation been the chief idea of every
+one. The nation has had a militaristic obsession.
+And this, naturally, has stifled the imagination.</p>
+
+<p>"But in Russia nothing of the sort has happened.
+Whatever the designs of the ruling classes
+may be, the people of Russia keep their simplicity,
+their large intellectuality and spirituality. And,
+therefore, their imagination and other great intellectual
+and spiritual gifts find expression in their
+great novels and plays.</p>
+
+<p>"I well remember how the Russian novelists
+impressed me when I was a young man. They
+opened to me what seemed to be a new world&mdash;and
+it was only the real world. There is Tcheckoff&mdash;have
+you read his <i>Orchard</i>? What life, what
+color, what beauty of truth are in that book!</p>
+
+<p>"Then there is Turgenieff&mdash;how grateful I am
+for his books! It must be thirty years since I first
+read him. Thomas Sargent Perry, of Boston, a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">8</a></span>
+man of the greatest culture, was almost the first
+American to read Turgenieff. Stedman read
+Turgenieff in those days, too. Soon all of the
+younger writers were reading him.</p>
+
+<p>"I remember very well a dinner at Whitelaw
+Reid's house in Lexington Avenue, when some of
+us young men were enthusiastic over the Russian
+novel, and the author we mentioned most frequently
+was Turgenieff.</p>
+
+<p>"Dr. J. G. Holland, the poet who edited <i>The
+Century</i>, lived across the street from Mr. Reid,
+and during the evening he came over and joined
+us. He listened to us for a long time in silence,
+hardly speaking a word. When he rose to go, he
+said: 'I have been listening to the conversation of
+these young men for over an hour. They have
+been talking about books. And I have never
+before heard the names of any of the authors they
+have mentioned.'"</p>
+
+<p>"Were those the days," I asked, "in which you
+first read Tolstoy?"</p>
+
+<p>"That was long before the time," answered Mr.
+Howells. "Tolstoy afterward meant everything
+to me&mdash;his philosophy as well as his art&mdash;far more
+than Turgenieff. Tolstoy did not love all his
+writing. He loved the thing that he wrote about,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">9</a></span>
+the thing that he lived and taught&mdash;equality. And
+equality is the best thing in the world. It is the
+thing for which the Best of Men lived and died.</p>
+
+<p>"I never met Tolstoy," said Mr. Howells.
+"But I once sent him a message of appreciation
+after he had sent a message to me. Tolstoy was
+great in the way he wrote as well as in what he
+wrote. Tolstoy's force is a moral force. His
+great art is as simple as nature."</p>
+
+<p>"Do you think that the Russian novelists have
+influenced your work?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"I think," Mr. Howells replied, "that I had
+determined what I was to do before I read any
+Russian novels. I first thought that it was
+necessary to write only about things that I knew
+had already been written about. Certain things
+had already been in books; therefore, I thought,
+they legitimately were literary subjects and I
+might write about them.</p>
+
+<p>"But soon I knew that this idea was wrong,
+that I must get my material, not out of books,
+but out of life. And I also knew that it was not
+necessary for me to look at life through English
+spectacles. Most of our writers had been looking
+at life through English spectacles; they had been
+closely following in the footsteps of English<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">10</a></span>
+novelists. I saw that around me were the materials
+for my work. I saw around me life&mdash;wholesome,
+natural, human.</p>
+
+<p>"I saw a young, free, energetic society. I saw
+a society in which love&mdash;the greatest and most
+beautiful thing in the world&mdash;was innocent; a society
+in which the relation between man and woman
+was simple and pure. Here, I thought, are the
+materials for novels. Why should I go back to the
+people of bygone ages and of lands not my own?"</p>
+
+<p>"Do you think," I asked, "that romanticism
+has lost its hold on the novelists?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Howells smiled. "When realism," he said,
+"is once in a novelist's blood he never can degenerate
+into romanticism. Romanticism is no
+longer a literary force among English-speaking
+authors. Romanticism belongs to the days in
+which war was an aim, an ideal, instead of a
+tragic accident. It is something foreign to us.
+And literature must be native to the soil, affected,
+of course, by the culture of other lands and ages,
+but essentially of the people of the land and time
+in which it is produced. Realism is the material
+of democracy. And no great literature or art
+can arise outside of the democracy."</p>
+
+<p>Tolstoy was mentioned again, and Mr. Howells<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">11</a></span>
+was asked if he did not think that the Russian
+novelist's custom of devoting a part of every day
+to work that was not literary showed that all
+writers would be better off if they were obliged to
+make a living in some other way than by writing.
+Mr. Howells gave his answer with considerable
+vigor. His calm, blue eyes lost something of
+their kindliness, and his lips were compressed
+into a straight, thin line before he said:</p>
+
+<p>"I certainly do not think so. The artist in
+letters or in lines should have leisure in which to
+perform his valuable service to society. The history
+of literature is full of heartbreaking instances
+of writers whose productive careers were retarded
+by their inability to earn a living at their chosen
+profession. The belief that poverty helps a
+writer is stupid and wrong. Necessity is not and
+never has been an incentive. Poverty is not and
+never has been an incentive. Writers and other
+creative artists are hindered, not helped, by lack
+of leisure.</p>
+
+<p>"I remember my own early experiences, and I
+know that my writing suffered very much because
+I could not devote all my time to it. I had to
+spend ten hours in drudgery for every two that
+I spent on my real work. The fact that authors<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">12</a></span>
+who have given the world things that it treasures
+are forced to live in a state of anxiety over their
+finances is lamentable. This anxiety cannot but
+have a restrictive influence on literature. It is
+not want, but the fear of want, that kills."</p>
+
+<p>"Still, in spite of their precarious financial condition,
+modern authors are doing good work, are
+they not?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Certainly they are," answered Mr. Howells,
+"the novelists especially. There is Robert Herrick,
+for example. His novels are interesting
+stories, and they also are faithful reflections of
+American life. Will Harben's work is admirable.
+It has splendid realism and fine humor. Perhaps
+one thing that has kept it, so far, from an appreciation
+so general as it will one day receive, is
+the fact that it deals, for the most part, with one
+special locality, a certain part of Georgia.</p>
+
+<p>"And in Spain&mdash;what excellent novelists they
+have there and have had for a long time! The
+realistic movement reached Spain long before it
+reached England and the United States. In fact,
+English-speaking countries were the last to accept it.
+I have taken great pleasure in the works
+of Armando Valdés. Then there are Pérez Galdós
+and Emilia Pardo Bazián, and that priest<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">13</a></span>
+who wrote a realistic novel about Madrid society.
+All these novelists are realists, and realists of
+power.</p>
+
+<p>"Then there are the great Scandinavians. I
+hope that I may some time attempt to express a
+little of my gratitude for the pleasure that Björnson's
+works have given me."</p>
+
+<p>I asked, "What do you think of contemporary
+poetry?"</p>
+
+<p>"I admired chiefly that of Thomas Hardy," said
+Mr. Howells. "His poems have force and actuality
+and music and charm. Masefield I like,
+with reservations. Three modern poets who give
+me great pleasure are Thomas Hardy, William
+Watson, and Charles Hanson Towne. The first
+one of Mr. Towne's poems that I read was "Manhattan."
+I have not forgotten the truth of that
+poetic interpretation of New York. His poems
+are beautiful and they are full of humanity. In
+his latest book there is a poem called 'A Ballad
+of Shame and Dread' that moved me deeply. It
+is a slight thing, but it is wonderfully powerful.
+Like all of Towne's poetry, it is warm with human
+sympathy."</p>
+
+<p>"Do you think," I asked, "that the great
+social problems of the day, the feminine unrest,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">14</a></span>
+for instance, are finding their expression in literature?"</p>
+
+<p>"No," said Mr. Howells, "I cannot call to mind
+any adequate literary expression of the woman
+movement. Perhaps this is because the women
+who know most about it and feel it most strongly
+are not writers. The best things that have been
+said about woman suffrage in our time have been
+said by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. She has
+written the noblest satire since Lowell. What wit
+she has, and what courage! Once I heard her
+address a meeting of Single-Taxers. Now, the
+Single-Taxers are all right so far as they go, but
+they don't go far enough. The Single-Taxers
+heckled her, but she had a retort ready for every
+interruption. She stood there with her brave
+smile and talked them all down."</p>
+
+<p>"Do you think that Ibsen expressed the modern
+feminine unrest in <i>The Doll's House</i>?" Mr.
+Howells was asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Ibsen seldom expressed things," was his reply.
+"He suggested them, mooted them, but he did
+not express them. <i>The Doll's House</i> does not
+express the meaning of unrest, it suggests it.
+Ibsen told you where you stood, not where to go."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Howells had recently presided at a meeting<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">15</a></span>
+which was addressed by M. Brieux, and he expressed
+great admiration for the work of the French
+dramatist.</p>
+
+<p>"He is a great dramatist," he said. "He has
+given faithful reports of life, and faithful reports
+of life are necessarily criticisms of life. All great
+novels are criticisms of life. And I think that the
+poets will concern themselves more and more with
+the life around them. It is possible that soon
+we may have an epic in which the poet deals with
+the events of contemporary life."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Howells is keenly awake to the effect which
+the war is having on conditions in New York.
+And in his sympathy for the society which inevitably
+must suffer for a war in which it is not
+directly concerned, the active interest of the
+novelist was evident. "If all this only could be
+reflected in a book!" he said. "If some novelist
+could interpret it!"</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">18</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">19</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>THE JOYS OF THE POOR</i></h2>
+
+<h4>KATHLEEN NORRIS</h4>
+
+
+<p>Any young woman who desires to become a
+famous novelist and short-story writer like
+Kathleen Norris will do well to take the following
+steps: In the first place, come to New York. In
+the second place, marry some one like Charles
+Gilman Norris.</p>
+
+<p>Of course, every one who read <i>Mother</i> and
+<i>The Rich Mrs. Burgoyne</i> and <i>Saturday's Child</i> knew
+that the author was a married woman&mdash;and also
+a married woman with plenty of personal experience
+with babies and stoves and servants and
+other important domestic items. But not until
+I visited Kathleen Norris at her very genuine
+home in Port Washington did I appreciate the
+part which that domestic item called a husband
+has played in Kathleen Norris's communications
+to the world.</p>
+
+<p>I made this discovery after Charles Gilman<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">20</a></span>
+Norris&mdash;accompanied by little Frank, who bears
+the name of the illustrious novelist who was his
+uncle&mdash;had motored me through Port Washington's
+pleasant avenues to the Norris house.
+Before a fire of crackling hickory logs, Kathleen
+Norris (clad in something very charming, which
+I will not attempt to describe) was talking about
+the qualities necessary to a writer's success. And
+one of these, she said, was a business sense.</p>
+
+<p>Now, Mrs. Norris did not look exactly business-like.
+Nor is "a business sense" the quality which
+most readers would immediately hit upon as the
+characteristic which made the author of <i>Gayley the
+Troubadour</i> different from the writers of other
+stories. I ventured to suggest this to Mrs. Norris.</p>
+
+<p>"I don't claim to possess a business sense,"
+she said. "But my husband has a business sense.
+He has taken charge of selling my stories to the
+magazines and dealing with publishers and all of
+that. I do think that literally thousands of
+writers are hindered from ever reaching the public
+by the lack of business sense. And I know that
+my husband has been responsible for getting most
+of my work published. My stories have appeared
+since my marriage, you know. I don't need to
+have a business sense, all I have to do is to write<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">21</a></span>
+the stories. My husband does all the rest&mdash;I
+don't need even to have any of the author's complacency,
+or the author's pride!"</p>
+
+<p>Mrs. Norris's fame is only about five years old&mdash;about
+as old as her son. I asked her about her
+life before she was known as a writer, expecting
+to hear picturesque tales of literary tribulations
+among the hills of California. But her description
+of her journey to success was not the conventional
+one; her journey was not for years
+paved with rejection slips and illumined with
+midnight oil.</p>
+
+<p>"It was New York that did it," she said.
+"When we first came to New York from California
+the editor of a magazine with which Mr.
+Norris was connected gave us a tea. Most of the
+people who were present were short-story writers
+and novelists. It was pleasant for me to meet
+them, and I enjoyed the afternoon. But my chief
+sensation was one of shock&mdash;it was a real shock
+to me to find that writers were people!</p>
+
+<p>"I felt as if I had met Joan of Arc, Cæsar,
+Cleopatra, Alexander the Great, and all the great
+figures of history, and found them to be human
+beings like myself. 'These writers are not supermen
+and superwomen,' I said to myself, 'they are<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">22</a></span>
+human beings like me. Why can't I do what
+they're doing?'</p>
+
+<p>"I thought this over after we went home that
+evening. And I made a resolve. I resolved that
+before the next tea that I attended I would tell
+a story. And when I next went to a tea I had
+sold a story."</p>
+
+<p>"To what publication had you sold it?" I
+asked.</p>
+
+<p>"To an evening paper," said Mrs. Norris;
+"but I had written and sold a story. That was
+something; it meant a great deal to me. My
+first stories were all sold to this evening paper,
+for twelve dollars each. This paper printed a
+story every day, paying twelve dollars for each
+of them, and giving a prize of fifty dollars for the
+best story published each week. I won one of the
+fifty-dollar prizes."</p>
+
+<p>Any one who to-day could buy a Kathleen
+Norris story for fifty dollars would be not an
+editor, but a magician. Yet the memory of that
+early triumph seemed to give Mrs. Norris real
+pleasure.</p>
+
+<p>"I wrote <i>What Happened to Alanna</i> two years
+before the Fire," she said. ("The Fire" means
+only one thing when a Californian says it.) "But<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">23</a></span>
+most of my stories have been written since I came
+to New York."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mrs. Norris for the history of one of
+her earliest stories, a story of California life which
+appeared in the <i>Atlantic Monthly</i>. She said:
+"That story went to twenty-six magazines before
+it was printed. My husband had an alphabetical
+list of magazines. He sent the story first to the
+<i>Atlantic Monthly</i> and then to twenty-five other
+magazines. They all returned it. Then he started
+at the top of the list again, and this time the
+<i>Atlantic Monthly</i> accepted it."</p>
+
+<p>The mention of Mr. Norris's activities in selling
+this story brought our conversation back to the
+subject of the "business sense."</p>
+
+<p>"A writer needs the ability to sell a story as
+well as the ability to write it," said Mrs. Norris,
+"unless there is some one else to do the writing.
+Many a woman writes a really good story, sends
+it hopefully to an editor, gets it back with a
+printed notice of its rejection, and puts it away
+in a desk drawer. Then years later she tells her
+grandchildren that she once wanted to be an
+author, but found that she couldn't do it.</p>
+
+<p>"Now, that is no way for a writer to gain
+success. The writer must be persevering, not only<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">24</a></span>
+in writing, but in trying to get his work before the
+public. Unless, as I said, there is some one else
+to supply the perseverance in getting the work
+before the public.</p>
+
+<p>"I think that the desire to write generally indicates
+the possession of the power to write. But
+young writers are too easily discouraged. But I
+have no right to blame a writer for being discouraged.
+I had frightful discouragement&mdash;until
+I was married."</p>
+
+<p>It is easy to see that Kathleen Norris does not
+hesitate to find in her own home life material for
+her industrious pen. Little Frank has undoubtedly
+served his mother as a model many times&mdash;which
+is not meant to indicate that he is that
+monstrosity, a model child. Indeed, Mrs. Norris
+believes that a novelist should use the material
+which lies ready at hand, instead of seeking for
+exotic and unusual topics. She sees that people
+want to read about the things with which they
+are already familiar, that they are not (as many
+young writers seem to think) eager for novelties.</p>
+
+<p>"I cannot understand," she said, "how it is
+that writers will clamor for recognition, and abuse
+the public for not welcoming them with enthusiasm,
+and yet will not give the public what they<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">25</a></span>
+know that the public wants. So many people
+seem to want just their own sort of art, but to
+want money, too. Now, I wouldn't write for a
+million dollars some of those things that are called
+'best sellers.' But I cannot see why a writer who
+is avowedly writing for the public should think
+it beneath him to treat the themes in which the
+public is interested. The greatest tragedy of
+literature is the writer who persists in trying to
+give the public what it does not want. Think of
+poor Gissing, for instance, dying embittered because
+he couldn't sell his work!"</p>
+
+<p>Mrs. Norris's conviction that a writer should
+use the material around him is so strong that she
+seems actually to be pained by the thought of all
+the excellent things for stories that are going to
+waste. I asked her if literature ever could come
+from apartment-houses. She said:</p>
+
+<p>"Of course it can! There is no reason why
+there shouldn't be good stories and novels of apartment-house
+life. One reason why we are not
+writing more and better stories of the life around
+us is because we are living that life so intensely&mdash;too
+intensely. We live in this country so close
+to our income that the problem of earning money
+makes us lose sight of the essentials of life. It<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">26</a></span>
+would be a fine thing for us, mentally and spiritually,
+if we should live on less than we do. If, for
+example, a family that found it was in receipt
+of a few hundred dollars more a year than before
+should decide, therefore, to live under a simpler
+scale than before, to do away with some really
+worthless luxuries, what a fine thing that would
+be!"</p>
+
+<p>Of course many young writers come to Mrs.
+Norris for advice. And some of them excellently
+illustrate the tendency which she deprecates, the
+tendency to write about the unknown instead of
+the familiar.</p>
+
+<p>"I was talking the other day to a young girl
+of my acquaintance who is a costume model," she
+said. "She has literary aspirations. Now, her
+life itself has been an interesting story&mdash;her rise
+from a shopgirl to her present position. And
+every now and then she will say something to me
+that is a most interesting revelation&mdash;something
+that indicates the rich store of experience that she
+might, if she would, draw upon in her stories.
+On one occasion she said to me, 'I went home and
+put my shoe-drawer in order.'</p>
+
+<p>"'What do you mean?' I asked. 'What is
+your shoe-drawer?'<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">27</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"'Why, my shoe-drawer!' she answered. 'You
+see, we costume models have to have a drawer
+full of shoes, because we must change our shoes
+to match every costume.'</p>
+
+<p>"Why is it," asked Mrs. Norris, "that a girl
+like that cannot see the value of such an incident
+as that? That shoe-drawer is a picturesque and
+interesting thing, unknown to most people. And
+this girl, who knows all about it, and wants to
+write, cannot see its literary value! And yet what
+more interesting subject is there for her to write
+about than that shoe-drawer? I do not see why
+writers will not appreciate the importance of
+writing about the things that are around them."</p>
+
+<p>Mrs. Norris gave a somewhat embarrassed
+laugh. "I really shouldn't attempt to lay down
+the law in this way," she said. "I can speak only
+for myself&mdash;I must write of the people and things
+that I know best, but I ought not to attempt to
+prescribe what other people shall write about."</p>
+
+<p>Mrs. Norris's chief literary enthusiasm seems
+to be Charles Dickens. "When we were all infants
+out in the backwoods of California," she
+said, "we battened on Dickens. Dickens and a
+writer whom I don't suppose anybody reads nowadays&mdash;Henry
+Kingsley. The boys read Sir<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">28</a></span>
+Walter Scott's novels, and left Dickens to me. I
+read Dickens with delight, and I still read him
+with delight. I have found passages in Dickens
+of which I honestly believe there are no equal in
+all English literature except in Shakespeare. I
+do not think that there is ever a year in which
+I do not read some of Dickens's novels over again.
+Of course, any one can find Dickens's faults&mdash;but
+I do not see how any one can fail to find his excellences."</p>
+
+<p>"What is it in Dickens that especially attracts
+you?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>Mrs. Norris was silent for a moment. Then
+she said: "I think I like him chiefly because he
+saw so clearly the joys of the poor. He did not
+give his poor people nothing but disease and oppression
+and despair. He gave them roast goose
+and plum pudding for their Christmas dinner&mdash;he
+gave them faith and hope and love. He knew
+that often the rich suffer and the poor are happy.</p>
+
+<p>"Many of the modern realists seem ignorant of
+the fact that the poor may be happy. They think
+that the cotter's Saturday night must always be
+squalid and sordid and dismal, and that the
+millionaire's Saturday night must be splendid and
+joyful. As a matter of fact, the poor family may<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">29</a></span>
+be, and often is, healthier and happier in every
+way than the rich family. But these extreme
+realists are not like Dickens, they have not his
+intimate knowledge of the life of the poor. They
+have the outsider's viewpoint.</p>
+
+<p>"Too many writers are telling us about the
+sorrows of the poor. We need writers who will
+tell us about the joys of the poor. We need
+writers who will be aware of the pleasures to be
+derived from a good dinner of corned beef and
+cabbage and a visit to a moving-picture theater.
+Often when I pass a row of mean houses, as they
+would be called, I think gratefully of the good
+times that I have had in just such places."</p>
+
+<p>The thought of that little Celtic Californian
+reading Dickens among the redwood-trees appealed
+to me. So I asked Mrs. Norris to tell
+more about her childhood.</p>
+
+<p>"Well," she said, "we hear a great deal about
+the misery, the bleak and barren lives of the children
+who live in the tenements of New York's
+lower East Side. But I think that an East Side
+tenement child would die of ennui if it should be
+brought up as we were brought up. We had none
+of the amusing and exciting experiences of the
+East Side child&mdash;we had no white stockings, no<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">30</a></span>
+ice-cream cones, no Coney Island, nothing of the
+sort.</p>
+
+<p>"We never even went to school. We would
+study French for a while with some French neighbor
+who had sufficient leisure to teach us, and
+then we'd study Spanish for a while with some
+Spaniard. That was the extent of our schooling.</p>
+
+<p>"My parents died when I was eighteen years
+old. I went to the city and tried my hand at
+different sorts of work. For one thing, I tried to
+get up children's parties, but in eighteen months
+I managed only one. Then I did settlement work,
+was a librarian, a companion, and society reporter
+on a newspaper. Then I got married&mdash;and wrote
+stories."</p>
+
+<p>Mrs. Norris was at one time opposed to woman
+suffrage. Now, however, she is a suffragist, but
+she refuses to say that she has been "converted"
+to suffragism.</p>
+
+<p>"I can't say that I have been converted to
+suffragism," she said, "any more than I can say
+that I have been converted to warm baths and
+tooth-brushes. And it does not seem to me that
+any women should need to defend her right to
+vote any more than she should need to defend
+her right to love her children. There is a theme<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">31</a></span>
+for a novel&mdash;a big suffrage novel will be written
+one of these days."</p>
+
+<p>It may be that the author of <i>Mother</i> will be the
+author of this "big suffrage novel." But at present
+she disclaims any such intention. But she
+admits that there is a purpose in all her portrayals
+of normal, wholesome American home life.</p>
+
+<p>"I don't think that I believe in 'art for art's
+sake,' as it is generally interpreted," she said.
+"Of course, I don't believe in what is called the
+commercial point of view&mdash;I have never written
+anything just to have it printed. But I do not
+believe that there is any one standard of art. I
+think that any book which the people ought to
+read must have back of it something besides the
+mere desire of the writer to create something. I
+never could write without a moral intention."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">34</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">35</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>NATIONAL PROSPERITY AND ART</i></h2>
+
+<h4>BOOTH TARKINGTON</h4>
+
+
+<p>Mr. Booth Tarkington never will be
+called the George M. Cohan of fiction. His
+novel, <i>The Turmoil</i>, is surely an indictment of
+modern American urban civilization; of its materialism,
+its braggadocio, its contempt for the
+things of the soul.</p>
+
+<p>It was with the purpose of making this indictment
+a little clearer than it could be when it is
+surrounded by a story, that I asked Mr. Tarkington
+a few questions. And his answers are not
+likely to increase our national complacencies.</p>
+
+<p>In the first place, I asked Mr. Tarkington if
+the atmosphere of a young and energetic nation
+might not reasonably be expected to be favorable
+to literary and artistic expression.</p>
+
+<p>"Yes, it might," said Mr. Tarkington. "There
+may be spiritual progress in America as phenomenal
+as her material progress.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">36</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"There is and has been extraordinary progress
+in the arts. But the people as a whole are naturally
+preoccupied with their material progress.
+They are much more interested in Mr. Rockefeller
+than in Mr. Sargent."</p>
+
+<p>The last two sentences of Mr. Tarkington's
+reply made me eager for something a little more
+specific on that subject.</p>
+
+<p>"What are the forces in America to-day," I
+asked, "that hinder the development of art and
+letters?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Tarkington replied: "There are no forces
+in America to-day that hinder the development
+of individuals in art and letters, save in unimportant
+cases here and there. But there is a spirit
+that hinders general personal decency, knows and
+cares nothing for beauty, and is glad to have its
+body dirty for the sake of what it calls 'prosperity.'</p>
+
+<p>"It 'wouldn't give a nickel' for any kind of art.
+But it can't and doesn't hinder artists from producing
+works of art, though it makes them swear."</p>
+
+<p>"But do not these conditions in many instances
+seriously hinder individual artists?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Tarkington smiled. "Nothing stops an
+artist if he is one," he said. "But many things<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">37</a></span>
+may prevent a people or a community from knowing
+or caring for art.</p>
+
+<p>"The climate may be unfavorable; we need not
+expect the Eskimos to be interested in architecture.
+In the United States politicians have
+usually controlled the public purchase of works
+of art and the erection of public buildings. This
+is bad for the public, naturally."</p>
+
+<p>"I suppose," I said, "that the conditions you
+describe are distinctively modern, are they not?
+At what time in the history of America have conditions
+been most favorable to literary expression?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Tarkington's reply was not what I expected.
+"At all times," he said. "Literary expression
+does not depend on the times, though the
+appreciation of it does, somewhat."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. Tarkington if he agreed with Mr.
+Gouverneur Morris in considering the short story
+a modern development. He did not.</p>
+
+<p>"There are short stories in the Bible," he said,
+"and in every mythology; 'folk stories' of all
+races and tribes. Probably Mr. Morris's definition
+of the short story would exclude these. I
+agree with him that short stories are better written
+nowadays."</p>
+
+<p>"But you do not believe," I said, "that American<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">38</a></span>
+literature in general is better than it used to
+be, do you? Why is it that there is now no group
+of American writers like the New England group
+which included Longfellow, Whittier, Lowell,
+Emerson, and Thoreau?"</p>
+
+<p>"Why is there," Mr. Tarkington asked in
+turn, "no group like Homer (wasn't he a group?)
+in Greece? There may be, but if there is just
+such a modern group it would tend only to repeat
+the work of the Homeric group, which wouldn't
+be interesting to the rest of us.</p>
+
+<p>"The important thing is to find a group unlike
+Longfellow, Whittier, Lowell, Emerson, and Thoreau.
+That is, if one accepts the idea that it is
+important to find a group."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Tarkington's criticisms of the modern
+American city have been so severe that I expected
+him to tell me that all writers should live in the
+country. But again he surprised me. In reply
+to my question as to which environment was more
+favorable to the production of literature, the city
+or the country, he said:</p>
+
+<p>"It depends upon the nerves of the writer. A
+writer can be born anywhere, and he can grow
+up anywhere."</p>
+
+<p>There has recently been considerable discussion&mdash;Professor<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">39</a></span>
+Edward Garnet and Gertrude Atherton
+have taken a considerable share in it&mdash;on
+the relative merits of contemporary English and
+American fiction. I asked Mr. Tarkington if in
+his opinion the United States had at the present
+time novelists equal to those of England.</p>
+
+<p>"That is unanswerable!" he answered. "Writers
+aren't like baseball teams. What's the value of
+my opinion that <i>The Undiscovered Country</i> is a
+'greater' novel than <i>A Pair of Blue Eyes</i>? These
+questions remind me of school debating societies.
+Nothing is demonstrated, but everybody has his
+own verdict."</p>
+
+<p>Until I asked Mr. Tarkington about it I had
+heard only two opinions as to the probable effect
+on literature of the war. One was that which
+William Dean Howells tersely expressed by saying:
+"War stops literature," and the other was
+that the war is purifying and strengthening all
+forms of literary expression.</p>
+
+<p>But Mr. Tarkington had something new to
+say about it. "What effect," I asked, "is the
+war likely to have on American literature?"</p>
+
+<p>"None of consequence," he answered. "The
+poet will find the subject, war or no war. The
+sculptor doesn't depend upon epaulets."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">40</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Mr. Tarkington is so inveterate a writer of
+serials, and his work is so familiar to the readers
+of the American magazines, that I desired to get
+his expert opinion as to whether or not the American
+magazines, with their remarkably high prices,
+had harmed or benefited fiction. His reply was
+somewhat non-committal.</p>
+
+<p>"They have induced many people to look upon
+the production of fiction as a profitable business,"
+he said. "But those people would merely not
+have 'tried fiction' at all otherwise. Prices have
+nothing to do with art."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Tarkington had some interesting things
+to say about that venerable mirage, the Great
+American Novel. I asked him if that longed-for
+work would ever be written; if, for example,
+there would ever be a work of fiction reflecting
+American life as <i>Vanity Fair</i> reflects English
+life. He replied:</p>
+
+<p>"If Thackeray had been an American he would
+not have written a novel reflecting American life as
+<i>Vanity Fair</i> reflected the English life of its time.
+He would have written of New York; his young
+men would have come there after Harvard. The
+only safe thing to say of the Great American Novel
+is that the author will never know he wrote it."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">41</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Mr. Charles Belmont Davis had told me that
+a writer who had some means of making a living
+other than writing would do better work than
+one who devoted himself exclusively to literature.
+I asked Mr. Tarkington what he thought about
+this.</p>
+
+<p>"I think," he said, "that it would be very
+well for a writer to have some means of making
+a living other than writing. There are likely to
+be times in his career when it would give him a
+sense of security concerning food. But I doubt
+if it would much affect his writing, unless he considered
+writing to be a business."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Tarkington's answer to my next question
+is hereby commended to the attention of all those
+feminine revolutionists who believe that they are
+engaged in the pleasant task of changing the whole
+current of modern thought.</p>
+
+<p>"How has literature been affected," I asked,
+"by the suffrage movement and feminism?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Tarkington looked up in some surprise.
+"I haven't heard of any change," he said.</p>
+
+<p>The author of <i>The Turmoil</i> could never be accused
+of jingoism. But he is far from agreeing
+with those critics who believe that American literature
+is merely "a phase of English literature."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">42</a></span>
+I asked him if he believed that there was such a
+thing as a distinctively American literature.</p>
+
+<p>"Certainly," he replied. "Is <i>Huckleberry Finn</i>
+a phase? It's a monument; not an English one.
+English happens to be the language largely used."</p>
+
+<p>The allusion in Mr. Tarkington's last reply
+suggested&mdash;what every reader of <i>Penrod</i> must
+know&mdash;that this novelist is an enthusiastic admirer
+of Mark Twain. So I told him that Mr.
+T. A. Daly had classed Mark Twain with Artemus
+Ward and Q. K. Philander Doesticks, P.B., and had
+said that these men wrote nothing of real merit
+and were "the Charlie Chaplins of their time."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Tarkington smiled. "Get Mr. T. A. Daly
+to talk some more," he said. "We'd like to hear
+something about Voltaire and Flo Ziegfeld. Second
+thoughts indicate that 'T. A. Daly' is the
+pen name of Mr. Charlie Chaplin. Of course!
+And that makes it all right and natural. I
+thought at first that it was a joke."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">44</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">45</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>ROMANTICISM AND AMERICAN HUMOR</i></h2>
+
+<h4>MONTAGUE GLASS</h4>
+
+<p>Once upon a time William Dean Howells
+leveled the keen lance of his satire against
+what he called "the monstrous rag baby of romanticism."
+In those simple days, literary labels
+were easily applied. A man who wrote about
+Rome, Italy, was a romanticist; a man who
+wrote about Rome, New York, was a Realist.</p>
+
+<p>Now, however, a writer who finds his themes
+in the wholesale business district of New York
+City does not disavow the title formerly given
+exclusively to makers of drawn-sword-and-prancing-steed
+fiction. Montague Glass is a romanticist.</p>
+
+<p>The laureate of the cloak-and-suit trade and
+biographer of Mr. Abe Potash and Mr. Mawruss
+Perlmutter does not believe that romance is a
+matter of time and place. A realistic novel, he
+believes, may be written about the Young Pretender<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">46</a></span>
+or Alexander the Great, and a romance
+about&mdash;well, about Elkan Lubliner, American.</p>
+
+<p>Of course, I asked him to defend his claim to
+the name of romanticist. He did so, but in general
+terms, without special reference to his own
+work. For this widely read author has the amazing
+virtue of modesty.</p>
+
+<p>"I do not think," he said, "that the so-called
+historical novelists are the only romanticists.
+The difference between the two schools of writers
+is in method, rather than in subject.</p>
+
+<p>"A romanticist is a writer who creates an
+atmosphere of his own about the things with
+which he deals. He is the poet, the constructive
+artist. He calls into being that which has not
+hitherto existed.</p>
+
+<p>"A realist, however, is a writer who faithfully
+reproduces an atmosphere that already exists.
+He reports, records; one of his distinguishing
+characteristics must be his attention to detail.
+The romanticist is as truthful as the realist, but
+he deals with a few large truths rather than with
+many small facts."</p>
+
+<p>"And you," I said, determined to make the
+conversation more personal, "prefer the romantic
+method?"<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">47</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Yes," said Mr. Glass, "I do. I prefer to use
+the romantic method, and to read the works of
+the writers who use it. I believe that there is
+more value in suggestion than in detailed description.
+For instance, I do not think that my
+stories would gain vividness if I should put all the
+dialogue&mdash;I tell my stories chiefly by means of
+dialogues, you know&mdash;into dialect. So I do not
+put down the dialogue phonetically. I spell the
+words correctly, not in accordance with the pronunciation
+of my characters.</p>
+
+<p>"This is not an invariable rule. When, for
+instance, Abe or Mawruss has learned a new long
+word which he uses frequently to show it off, he
+generally mispronounces it. He may say 'quincidence'
+for 'coincidence.' Such a mispronunciation
+as this I reproduce, for it has its significance
+as a revelation of character. But I do not
+attempt to put down all mispronunciations; I
+let the dialect be imagined.</p>
+
+<p>"The romanticist, you see, uses his own imagination
+and expects imagination in his readers. His
+method might be called impressionistic; he outlines
+and suggests, instead of describing exhaustively.
+The romanticist really is more economical than
+the realist, and he has more restraint."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">48</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Who are the leading romanticists of the day?"
+I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Well," Mr. Glass replied, "my favorite among
+contemporary romanticists is Joseph Conrad.
+There is a man who is certainly no swashbuckling
+novelist of the Wardour Street school. He writes
+of modern life, and yet he is a romanticist through
+and through.</p>
+
+<p>"I think that I may justly claim to be one of
+the first admirers of Conrad in America. I used
+to read him when apparently the only other man
+in this part of the world to appreciate him was
+William L. Alden, who praised him in the columns
+of the <i>New York Times Review of Books</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"I well remember my discovery of Conrad. I
+went to Brooklyn to hear 'Tosca' sung at the
+Academy of Music. I had bought my ticket,
+and I had about an hour to spend before it would
+be time for the curtain to rise. So I went across
+the street to the Brooklyn Public Library.</p>
+
+<p>"While I was idly looking over the novels on
+the shelves I came upon Conrad's <i>Typhoon</i>. I
+sat down and began to read it.</p>
+
+<p>"When I arose, I had finished the book. Also,
+I had missed the first two acts of the opera&mdash;and
+I had been eager to hear them. But Conrad<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">49</a></span>
+more than compensated for the loss of those two
+acts.</p>
+
+<p>"Many of the modern English writers are
+romanticists. Galsworthy surely is no realist.
+And William de Morgan, although he writes at
+great length and has abundance of detail, is a
+romanticist. He does not use detail for its own
+sake, as the realists use it; he uses it only when
+it has some definite value in unfolding the plot
+or revealing character. He uses it significantly;
+he is particularly successful in using it humorously,
+as Daudet and Dickens used it. Arnold Bennett
+is a realist, and I think that one of the reasons
+why he is so widely read in the United States is
+because the life which he describes so minutely
+is a life much like that of his American readers.
+People like to read about the sort of life they
+already know. The average reader wants to have
+a sense of familiarity with the characters in his
+novels."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Glass is a contrary person. It is contrary
+for the only novelist who knows anything about
+New York's cloak-and-suit trade to be of English
+birth and to look like a poet. It is contrary of
+him to have that distinctively American play,
+"Potash and Perlmutter," start its London run<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">50</a></span>
+two years ago and be "still going strong." And it
+was contrary of him not to say, as he might reasonably
+be expected to say in view of his own success,
+that the encounters and adventures of business
+must be the theme of the American novelists of
+the future.</p>
+
+<p>"No," he said, in answer to my question, "I
+do not see any reason for the novelist to confine
+himself to business life. Themes for fiction are
+universal. A novelist should write of the life he
+knows best, whatever it may be.</p>
+
+<p>"I do not mean that the novelist should write
+about his own business. I mean that he should
+write about the psychology that he understands.
+A man who spends years in the cloak-and-suit
+business is not, therefore, qualified to write novels
+about that business, even if he is qualified to
+write novels at all.</p>
+
+<p>"I had no real knowledge of the cloak-and-suit
+trade when I began to write about it. I made
+many technical blunders. For instance, I had
+Potash and Perlmutter buying goods by the
+gross instead of by the piece. And I received
+many indignant letters pointing out my mistake.</p>
+
+<p>"I had never been in the cloak-and-suit trade.
+But my work as a lawyer had brought me into<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">51</a></span>
+contact with many people who were in that business,
+and I had intimate knowledge of the psychology
+of the Jew, his religion, his humor, his tragedy,
+his whole attitude toward life.</p>
+
+<p>"The trouble with many young writers," said
+Mr. Glass, "is that they don't know what they
+are writing about. They are attempting to describe
+psychological states of which they have
+only third-hand knowledge. Their ideas have no
+semblance of truth, and therefore their work is
+absolutely unconvincing."</p>
+
+<p>"At any rate," I said, "you will admit that
+American writers are more and more inclined to
+make the United States the scene of their stories.
+Do you think that O. Henry's influence is responsible
+for this?"</p>
+
+<p>"No," said Mr. Glass, "I do not think that
+this is due to O. Henry's influence. It was a
+natural development. You see, O. Henry's literary
+life lasted for only about four years, and
+while he has had many imitators, I do not think
+that he can be given credit for directing the attention
+of American writers to the life of their own
+country.</p>
+
+<p>"Probably William Dean Howells should be
+called the founder of the modern school of American<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">52</a></span>
+fiction. He was the first writer to achieve
+distinguished success for tales of modern American
+life. There were several other authors who began
+to write about Americans soon after Mr. Howells
+began&mdash;Thomas Janvier, H. C. Bunner, and
+Brander Matthews were among them.</p>
+
+<p>"Kipling's popularity gave a great impetus to
+the writing of short stories of modern life. It is
+interesting to trace the course of the short story
+from Kipling to O. Henry.</p>
+
+<p>"Did you ever notice," asked Mr. Glass, "that
+the best stories on New York life are written by
+people who have been born and brought up outside
+of the city? The writer who has always lived in
+New York seems thereby to be disqualified from
+writing about it, just as the man in the cloak-and-suit
+trade is too close to his subject to reproduce
+it in fiction. The writer who comes to New York
+after spending his youth elsewhere gets the full
+romantic effect of New York; he gets a perspective
+on it which the native New-Yorker seldom attains.
+The viewpoint of the writer who has always lived
+in New York is subjective, whereas one must have
+the objective viewpoint to write about the city
+successfully.</p>
+
+<p>"I have been surprised by the caricatures of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">53</a></span>
+American life which come from the pen of writers
+American by birth and ancestry. Recently I
+read a novel by an American who has&mdash;and deserves,
+for he is a writer of talent and reputation&mdash;a
+large following. This was a story of life in a
+manufacturing town with which the novelist is
+thoroughly familiar. It, however, appears to have
+been written to satisfy a grudge and consequently
+one could mistake it for the work of an Englishman
+who had once made a brief tour of America.
+For the big manufacturer who was the principal
+character in the story was vulgar enough to
+satisfy the prejudice of any reader of the <i>London
+Daily Mail</i>. Certainly the descriptions of the
+gaudy and offensive furniture in the rich manufacturer's
+house and the dialogue of the members
+of his family and the servants could provide splendid
+ammunition for the <i>Saturday Review</i> or <i>The
+Academy</i>. The book appears to be a caricature,
+and yet that novelist had lived most of his life
+among the sort of people about whom he was
+writing!</p>
+
+<p>"And how absolutely ignorant most New-Yorkers
+are of New York. Irvin Cobb comes
+here from Louisville, Kentucky, and gets an intimate
+knowledge of the city, and puts that knowledge<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">54</a></span>
+into his short stories. But a man brought
+up here makes the most ridiculous mistakes when
+he writes about New York.</p>
+
+<p>"I read a story of New York life recently that
+absolutely disgusted me, its author was so ignorant
+of his subject. Yet he was a born New-Yorker.
+Let me tell you what he wrote. He
+said that a man went into an arm-chair lunch-room
+and bought a meal. His check amounted
+to sixty-five cents! Now any one who knows
+anything about arm-chair lunch-rooms beyond the
+mere fact of their existence knows that the cashier
+of such an institution would drop dead if a customer
+paid him sixty-five cents at one time.
+Then, the hero of this story had as a part of his
+meal in this arm-chair lunch-room a baked potato,
+for which he paid fifteen cents! Imagine a baked
+potato in such a place, and a fifteen-cent baked
+potato at that!"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Glass did not, like most successful humorists,
+begin as a writer of tragedy. His first story
+to be printed was "Aloysius of the Docks," a
+humorous story of an East Side Irish boy, which
+appeared in 1900. The lower East Side was for
+many years the scene of most of his stories. But
+he does resemble most other writers in this respect,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">55</a></span>
+that he wrote verse before he wrote fiction.
+I asked him to show me some of his poetry, and
+he demurred somewhat violently. But, after all,
+a poet is a poet, and at last I succeeded in persuading
+him to produce this exhibit. Here it is&mdash;a
+poem by the author of "Potash and Perlmutter":</p>
+
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i4">FERRYBOATS<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i0">There sounds aloft a warning scream,<br /></span>
+<span class="i2">The jingling bell gives tongue below,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">She breasts again the busy stream,<br /></span>
+<span class="i2">And cleaves its murky tide to snow.<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">Bereft of burnished glittering brass,<br /></span>
+<span class="i2">Ungainly bulging fore and aft,<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">Slowly from shore to shore they pass&mdash;<br /></span>
+<span class="i2">The matrons of the river craft.<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>Mr. Glass believes that humorous writing in
+America has changed more than any other sort.
+But he does not, as I thought he would, attribute
+this change to the increased cosmopolitanism of
+the country, to the influx of people from other
+lands.</p>
+
+<p>"Certainly our ideas of what is funny have
+changed," he said. "Humor is an ephemeral
+thing. A generation ago we laughed at what
+to-day would merely make us ill. The subjects
+and the methods of the humorists are different.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">56</a></span>
+Who nowadays can find a laugh in the pages of
+Artemus Ward, Philander Q. Doesticks, or Petroleum
+V. Nasby? Yet in their time these men
+set the whole continent in a roar.</p>
+
+<p>"Contrast two humorists typical of their respective
+periods&mdash;Bill Nye and Abe Martin. I
+remember many years ago reading a story by
+Bill Nye which every one then considered tremendously
+funny. He told how he went downtown
+and got a shave and put on a clean collar
+and as he said, 'otherwise disguised himself.'
+When he got home his little dog refused to recognize
+him, and several pages were devoted to his
+efforts to persuade the dog of his identity. Then,
+failing to convince the dog that he was really the
+same Bill Nye in spite of his shave and clean
+collar, he impaled it on a pitchfork and buried it,
+putting over it the epitaph, 'Not dead, but jerked
+hence by request.'</p>
+
+<p>"Now contrast with that a good example of
+modern American humor&mdash;a joke by Abe Martin
+which I recently saw. There was a picture of two
+or three men looking at a tattered tramp, and one
+of them was represented as saying: 'You wouldn't
+think to look at him that that man played an
+elegant game of billiards ten years ago!'<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">57</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"It is an entirely different form of humor, you
+see. Bill Nye and the writers of his school got
+their effects by grotesque misspelling, fantastic
+ideas, and by the liberal use of shock and surprise.
+The modern humor is subtler, more delicate, and
+more likely to endure.</p>
+
+<p>"I do not think that the fact that America has
+become more cosmopolitan has anything to do
+with this altered sense of humor. The American
+humorists do not select cosmopolitan themes; the
+best of them are distinctively American in their
+subject. Irvin Cobb, George Fitch, Kate Douglas
+Wiggin, Edna Ferber Stewart, who wrote <i>The
+Fugitive Blacksmith</i>&mdash;all these people draw their
+inspiration from purely American phases of the
+life around them."</p>
+
+<p>"What is it, then," I asked, "that has changed
+American humor?"</p>
+
+<p>"Leisure," answered Mr. Glass. "Philander
+Q. Doesticks and other humorists of his time
+wrote to amuse pioneers, people rough and elemental
+in their tastes. Their audience consisted
+of men who worked hard most of the time, and
+therefore had to be hit hard by any joke that was
+to entertain them at all. But as Americans grew
+more leisurely, and therefore had time to read,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">58</a></span>
+see plays, and look at pictures, they lost their
+taste for crude and violent horseplay, and the
+new sort of humor came in. Undoubtedly the
+same thing occurs in every newly settled country&mdash;Australia,
+for example. It is unlikely that the
+Australian of one hundred years from now will
+be amused by the things that amuse Australians
+to-day.</p>
+
+<p>"But the humor that entertains the citizens of
+a country of which the civilization is well established
+is likely to retain its charm through the
+years. Mark Twain's stories do not lose their
+flavor. But Mark Twain was not exclusively a
+humorist; he was a student of life and he reflected
+the tragedy of existence as well as its
+comedy. So does Irvin Cobb, who is the nearest
+approach to Mark Twain now living.</p>
+
+<p>"One source of Mark Twain's strength is his
+occasional vulgarity. That surely is something
+that we should have in greater abundance in
+American humor. I do not mean that our humorists
+should be pornographic and obscene; I
+mean merely that they should be allowed great
+freedom in their choice of themes. There is no
+humor without vulgarity. Our humorists have
+been so limited and restrained that we have no<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">59</a></span>
+paper fit to be compared with <i>Simplicissimus</i> or
+<i>Le Rire</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"You see, a vulgar thing is not offensive if it is
+funny. Fun for fun's sake is a much more important
+maxim than art for art's sake. The
+humorists have a greater need for freedom in
+choice of themes than the serious writers, especially
+the realistic writers, who are always demanding
+greater freedom."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Glass returned to the subject of the failure
+of cosmopolitanism to influence American literature
+by calling attention to the fact that very few
+American writers find their themes among their
+foreign-born fellow-citizens. "Where," he asked,
+"are the German-Americans and the Italian-Americans?
+No writer knows these foreign-born
+citizens well enough to write about them. The
+best American stories are about native Americans.
+I admit that my stories are not about people peculiar
+to New York&mdash;you can find counterparts
+of 'Potash and Perlmutter' in Berlin, Paris, and
+London. But mine are not among the best stories
+of American character. The best story of American
+character is 'Daisy Miller.'"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Glass believes that the technique of the
+short story has improved greatly during the last<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">60</a></span>
+score of years, but he is not so favorable in his
+view of the modern novel, especially of the "cross-section
+of life" type of work. He believes that
+the war will produce a great revival of literary
+excellence in Europe, just as the Franco-Prussian
+War did; and he called attention to something
+which has apparently been neglected by most
+people who have discussed the subject&mdash;the tremendous
+inspiration which Guy de Maupassant
+found in the Franco-Prussian War. But he said,
+in conclusion:</p>
+
+<p>"But any man who sits down to judge American
+literature in the course of a few minutes' talk is
+an ass for his pains. Literary snap judgments are
+foolish things. Nothing that I have said to you
+has any value at all."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">62</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">63</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>THE "MOVIES" BENEFIT LITERATURE</i></h2>
+
+<h4>REX BEACH</h4>
+
+<p>Even the most prejudiced opponent of the
+moving pictures will admit that they are
+becoming more intellectually respectable. Crude
+farce and melodrama are being replaced by versions
+of classic plays and novels; literature is
+elevating the motion picture. And Mr. Rex
+Beach believes that the motion picture is benefiting
+literature.</p>
+
+<p>This author of widely read novels had been
+talking to me about the departments of literature&mdash;the
+novel, the short story, and the rest&mdash;and
+among them he named the moving picture. I
+asked him if he believed that moving pictures
+were dangerous for novelists, leading them to fill
+their books with action, with a view to the profits
+of cinematographic reproduction. He said:</p>
+
+<p>"Well, authors are human beings, of course.
+They like to make money and to have their work<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">64</a></span>
+reach as large an audience as possible. I suppose
+that the great majority of them keep their eyes
+on the screen, because they know how profitable
+the moving picture is and because they want
+their work seen by more people than would read
+their novels."</p>
+
+<p>"Do you think that this harms their work?" I
+asked.</p>
+
+<p>"It might if the novelists overdid it," he answered.
+"It would harm their work if they became
+nothing but scenario writers. But so far
+the result has been good.</p>
+
+<p>"The tendency of the moving picture has been
+to make authors visualize more clearly than ever
+before their characters and scenes that they are
+writing about. Their work has become more
+realistic. I do not mean realistic in the sense in
+which this word is used of some French writers;
+I do not mean erotic or morbid. I mean actual,
+convincing, clearly visualized.</p>
+
+<p>"Literature has elevated the moving picture,
+keeping it out, to a great extent, of melodrama
+and slap-stick comedy. And in return, the moving
+picture has done a service to fiction, making
+the authors give more attention to exact visualization."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">65</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Has American fiction been lacking in visualization?"
+I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"No," said Mr. Beach. "American novelists
+visualize more clearly to-day than they did four
+or five years ago, before the moving picture had
+become so important, but they always were
+strong in visualization. This sort of realism is
+America's chief contribution to fiction."</p>
+
+<p>"Then you believe that there is a distinctively
+American literature?" I asked. "You do not
+agree with the critic who said that American
+literature was 'a condition of English literature'?"</p>
+
+<p>"I do not agree with him," Mr. Beach replied.
+"American writers use the English language, so I
+suppose that what they write belongs to English
+literature. But there is a distinctively American
+literature; Americans talk in their own manner,
+think in their own manner, and handle business
+propositions in their own manner, and naturally
+they write in their own manner. American
+literature is different from other kinds of literature
+just as American business methods are different
+from those of Europe.</p>
+
+<p>"Fiction written in America must necessarily
+be tinged with American thought and American
+action. I have no patience with people who say<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">66</a></span>
+that America has no literature. They say that
+nothing we are writing to-day will live. Well,
+what if that is true? It's true not only of literature,
+but of everything else.</p>
+
+<p>"Our roads won't last forever; they're built in
+a hurry to be used in a hurry. But they're better
+roads to drive and motor over than those old
+Roman roads of Europe. Our office-buildings
+won't last as long as the Pyramids, but they're
+better for business purposes.</p>
+
+<p>"Personally, I've never been enthusiastic over
+things that have no virtues but age and ugliness.
+I'd rather have a good, strong, serviceable piece
+of Grand Rapids furniture than any ramshackle,
+moth-eaten antique."</p>
+
+<p>"But don't you think," I asked, "that the permanence
+of a book's appeal is a proof of its greatness?"</p>
+
+<p>"I don't see how we can tell anything definite
+about the permanence of the appeal of books
+written in our time. And I don't mean by literature
+writings that necessarily endure through the
+ages. I believe that literature is the expression
+of the mind, the sentiment, the intellectual attitude
+of the people who live at the time it is written.
+I admit that our literature is ephemeral&mdash;like<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">67</a></span>
+everything else about us&mdash;but I believe that it
+is good."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Rex Beach was not pacing his floor nervously;
+he was crossing the room with the practical
+intention of procuring a cigarette. Nevertheless,
+his firm tread lent emphasis to his remarks.</p>
+
+<p>"There is a sort of literary snobbery," he said,
+"noticeable among people who condemn contemporaneous
+literature just because it is contemporaneous.
+The strongest proof that there is
+something good in the literature of the day is
+that it reaches a great audience. There must be
+something in it or people wouldn't read it.</p>
+
+<p>"The people are the final judges; it is to them
+that authors must appeal. Take any big question
+of public importance&mdash;after it has been discussed
+by politicians and newspapers, it is the
+people who at last decide it.</p>
+
+<p>"A man may have devoted his life to some
+tremendous achievement, and have left it as a
+monument to his fame. But it is to public opinion
+that we must look for the verdict on the value
+of his life's work.</p>
+
+<p>"Take Carnegie, for example; when he dies,
+you bet people will have his number! His ideas
+are a tremendous menace, and the people who<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">68</a></span>
+believe as he does about peace will find themselves
+generally execrated one of these days.</p>
+
+<p>"It may seem to you that this has nothing to
+do with literature. But it has a good deal to do
+with it. I know that many things have been said
+about the effect on literature of the war. But I
+want to say that the war will have, I hope, one
+admirable effect on American writers&mdash;it will make
+them stir up the American conscience to a sense
+of the necessity for national defensive preparation.
+The writers must educate the people in
+world politics and show them the necessity for
+defensive action. Americans have a sort of mental
+inertia in regard to public questions, and the
+writers must overcome this inertia.</p>
+
+<p>"The writers must stir up the politicians and
+the people. There's been a whole lot of mush
+written about peace. There always will be war.
+We can't reform the world.</p>
+
+<p>"The pacifists say that it is useless to arm because
+war cannot be prevented by armaments.
+The obvious answer to that is that neither can
+the failure to arm prevent war. And the verdict
+after the war will be better if we are prepared for
+it. The writers must call our attention to the
+folly of leaving ourselves open to attack.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">69</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"It's hard to reach the conscience of the American
+people on any big issue. We are too independent,
+too indifferent, too ready to slump back.
+That's one of the penalties of democracy, I suppose;
+the national sense of patriotism becomes
+atrophied. It needs some whaling-big jolt to
+wake it up. Every American writer can help
+to do this.</p>
+
+<p>"The trouble is that we have too many men
+with feminine minds, too many of these delicate
+fellows with handkerchiefs up their sleeves. I
+can't imagine any women with ideas more feminine
+than those of Bryan&mdash;could any woman
+evolve anything more feminine than his peace-at-any-price
+idea?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Beach smiled. "I suppose I should not be
+talking about world politics," he said. "There
+are so many men who have specialized in that subject
+and are therefore competent to talk about
+it. I am only a specialist in writing."</p>
+
+<p>"Do you think," I asked, "that writers should
+be specialists in writing? Some people believe
+that the best fiction, for example, is produced by
+men who do some other work for a living."</p>
+
+<p>"I certainly believe that a writer should devote
+himself to writing," said Mr. Beach. "This is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">70</a></span>
+an age of specialization, and literature is no exception
+to the general rule. Literature is like
+everything else&mdash;you must specialize in it to be
+successful."</p>
+
+<p>"This has not always been the case, has it?"
+I asked. "Has literature been produced by people
+who made writing only an avocation?"</p>
+
+<p>"Surely," said Mr. Beach. "It is only within
+the last few years that writers have been able
+to write for a living and make enough to keep the
+fringe off their cuffs."</p>
+
+<p>I asked what had caused this change.</p>
+
+<p>"It has been caused chiefly by the magazines.
+The modern magazines have done two important
+things for fiction&mdash;they have brought it within
+every one's reach, and they have increased the
+prices paid to the authors, thus enabling them to
+make a living by devoting themselves exclusively
+to writing."</p>
+
+<p>"But it has been said," I ventured, "that a
+writer, no matter how talented he may be, cannot
+make a comfortable living out of writing fiction
+unless he is most extraordinarily gifted with ideas,
+and that, therefore, a writer takes a tremendous
+risk if he throws himself upon literature for support."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">71</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"How is a writer going to get ideas for stories,"
+asked Mr. Beach, in turn, "unless he uses ideas?
+The more ideas a man uses, the more ideas will
+come to him.</p>
+
+<p>"The imaginative quality in a man is like any
+other quality; the more it is functioned the better
+it is functioned. If you fail to use any organ of
+your body, nature will in time let that organ go
+out of commission.</p>
+
+<p>"It is just the same with imagination as with
+any organ of the body. If a writer waits for ideas
+to come to him and ceases to exercise his imagination,
+his imagination will become atrophied. But
+if he uses his imagination it will grow stronger and
+ideas will come to him with increasing frequency."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Beach is an enthusiastic advocate of the
+moving picture. In the course of his discussion
+of it he advanced an interesting theory as to the
+next stage of its development.</p>
+
+<p>"The next use of the moving picture," he said,
+"will be the editorial use. We have had the
+moving picture used as a comic device, as a device
+to spread news, and as an interpreter of fiction.
+But as yet no one has endeavored to use
+it as a means to mold public opinion in great
+vital issues of the day.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">72</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Of course, it has been used educationally,
+and as part of various propaganda schemes. But
+it will be used in connection with great political
+problems. It will become the most powerful of
+all influences for directing public opinion in politics
+and in everything else.</p>
+
+<p>"It will play a mighty part in the thought of
+the country and of the world.</p>
+
+<p>"I have seen men and women coming from a
+great moving-picture show almost hysterical with
+emotion. I have heard them shout and stamp
+and whistle at what they saw flashed before them
+on a white sheet as they never did in any theater.</p>
+
+<p>"What a strong argument 'The Birth of a
+Nation' presents! Now, suppose that same art
+and that same equipment were used to present
+arguments about some political issue of our own
+time, instead of one of our fathers' time. What
+a force that would be!"</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">74</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">75</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>WHAT IS GENIUS?</i></h2>
+
+<h4>ROBERT W. CHAMBERS</h4>
+
+<p>Sentimental Tommy's great predecessor
+in the relentless pursuit of the "right
+word" was, teachers of literature tell us, the unsentimental
+Gustave Flaubert. But these academic
+gentlemen, who insist that the writer shall
+spend hours, even days, if necessary, in perfecting
+a single sentence, seldom produce any literature.
+I asked Robert W. Chambers, who has written
+more "best sellers" than any other living writer,
+what he thought of Flaubert's method of work.</p>
+
+<p>He looked at me rather quizzically. "I think,"
+he said, with a smile, "that Flaubert was slow.
+What else is there to think? Of course he was
+a matchless workman. But if he spent half a day
+in hunting for one word, he was slow, that's all.
+He might have gone on writing and then have
+come back later for that inevitable word."</p>
+
+<p>"But what do you think of Flaubert's method,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">76</a></span>
+as a method?" I asked. "Do you think that a
+writer who works with such laborious care is
+right?"</p>
+
+<p>"It's not a question of right or wrong," said
+Mr. Chambers, "it's a question of the individual
+writer's ability and tendency. If a man can produce
+novels like those of Flaubert, by writing
+slowly and laboriously, by all means let him write
+that way. But it would not be fair to establish
+that as the only legitimate method of writing.</p>
+
+<p>"Some authors always write slowly. With
+some of them it's like pulling teeth for them to
+get their ideas out on paper. It's the same way
+in painting. You may see half a dozen men
+drawing from the same model. One will make his
+sketch premier coup; another will devote an hour
+to his; another will work all day. They may be
+artists of equal ability. It is the result that
+counts, not the method or the time."</p>
+
+<p>"And what is it that makes a man an artist,
+in pigments or in words?" I asked. "Do you
+believe in the old saying that the poet&mdash;the
+creative artist&mdash;is born and not made?"</p>
+
+<p>"No," said Mr. Chambers, "I do not think that
+that is the truth. I think that with regard to
+the writer it is true to this extent, that there must<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">77</a></span>
+exist, in the first place, the inclination to write,
+to express ideas in written words. Then the
+writer must have something to express really
+worthy of expression, and he must learn how to
+express it. These three things make the writer&mdash;the
+inclination to say something, the possession
+of something worth saying, and the knowledge of
+how to say it."</p>
+
+<p>"And where does genius come in?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"What is genius?" asked Mr. Chambers, in turn.
+"I don't know. Perhaps genius is the combination
+of these three qualities in the highest degree.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course," he added, with a laugh, "I know
+that all this is contrary to the opinion of the public.
+People like to believe that writers depend entirely
+upon an inspiration. They like to think that
+we are a hazy lot, sitting around and posing and
+waiting for some sort of divine afflatus. They
+think that writers sit around like a Quaker meeting,
+waiting for the spirit to move them."</p>
+
+<p>"But have there not been writers," I asked,
+"who seem to prove that there is some truth in
+the inspiration theory? There is William de
+Morgan, for example, beginning to write novels
+in his old age. He spent most of his life in working
+in ceramics, not with words."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">78</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"On the contrary," said Mr. Chambers, "I
+think that William de Morgan proves my theory.
+He really spent all his life in learning to write&mdash;he
+was in training for being a novelist all the while.
+The novelist's training may be unconscious. He
+must have&mdash;as William de Morgan surely always
+has had&mdash;keen interest in the world. That is
+the main thing for the writer to have&mdash;a vivid
+interest in life. If we are to devote ourselves to
+the production of pictures of humanity according
+to our own temperaments, we must have this
+vivid interest in life; we must have intense
+curiosity. The men who have counted in literature
+have had this intense, never-satiated curiosity
+about life.</p>
+
+<p>"This is true for the romanticists as well as the
+realists. The most imaginative and fantastic romances
+must have their basis in real life.</p>
+
+<p>"I know of no better examples of this truth
+than the gargoyles which one sees in Gothic architecture
+in Europe. These extraordinary creatures
+that thrust their heads from the sides of cathedrals,
+misshapen and grotesque, are nevertheless
+thoroughly logical. That is, no matter how fantastic
+they may be, they have backbones and ribs
+and tails, and these backbones and ribs and tails<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">79</a></span>
+are logical&mdash;that is, they could do what backbones
+and ribs and tails are supposed to do.</p>
+
+<p>"In real life there are no creatures like the gargoyles,
+but the important thing is that the gargoyles
+really could exist. This is a good example
+of the true method of construction. The base of
+the construction must rest on real knowledge.
+The medieval sculptors knew the formation of
+existing animals; therefore they knew how to
+make gargoyles."</p>
+
+<p>"How does this theory apply to poets?" I
+asked.</p>
+
+<p>"I don't know," answered Mr. Chambers, "but
+it seems to me to apply to all creative work. The
+artist must know life before he can build even a
+travesty on life."</p>
+
+<p>I called Mr. Chambers's attention to the work
+of certain ultra-modern poets who deliberately
+exclude life from their work. He was not inclined
+to take them seriously.</p>
+
+<p>"There always have been aberrations," he said,
+"and there always will be. They're bound to
+exist. And there is bound to be, from time to
+time, attitudinizing and straining after effect on
+the part of prose writers as well as poets. And
+it is all based on one thing&mdash;self-consciousness.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">80</a></span>
+It is self-consciousness that spoils the work of
+some modern writers."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. Chambers to be more specific in
+his allusions. "I cannot mention names," he said,
+"but there are certain writers who are always
+conscious of the style in which they are writing.
+Sometimes they consciously write in the style of
+some other men. They are thinking all the while
+of their technique and equipment, and the result
+is that their work loses its effect. A writer should
+not be convinced all the while that he is a realist
+or a romanticist; he should not subject himself
+deliberately to some special school of writing, and
+certainly he should not be conscious of his own
+style. The less a writer thinks of his technique
+the sooner he arrives at self-expression.</p>
+
+<p>"It's just like ordinary conversation. A man
+is known by the way in which he talks&mdash;that is
+his 'style.' But he is not all the while acutely
+conscious of his manner of talking&mdash;unless he has
+an impediment in his speech. So the writer
+should be known by his untrammeled and unembarrassed
+expression."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. Chambers what he thought of the
+idea that the popularity of magazines has vitiated
+the public taste and lowered the standard of fiction.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">81</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"I do not think that this is the case," he said.
+"I do not see that the custom of serial publication
+has harmed the novel. It is not a modern
+innovation, you know. The novels of Dickens,
+Thackeray, and George Eliot had serial publication.
+But I do believe that the American public
+reads less fiction than it did a generation ago,
+and that its taste is not so good as it was."</p>
+
+<p>This was a surprising statement to come from
+an author whom the public has received with such
+enthusiasm, so I asked Mr. Chambers to explain.</p>
+
+<p>"In the days of our forefathers," he said, "this
+was an Anglo-Saxon country. Then the average
+intelligence of the nation was higher and the taste
+in literature better. But there came the great
+rush of immigration to the United States from
+Europe, and the Anglo-Saxon culture of the
+country was diluted.</p>
+
+<p>"You see signs of this lowered standard of
+taste in fiction and on the stage. The demand is
+for primitive and childish stuff, and the reason for
+this is that the audience has only a sort of backstairs
+intelligence. If we had progressed along the
+lines in which we were headed before this wave
+of immigration, we would not be satisfied with
+the books and magazines that are given us to-day.</p>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">82</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Of course the magazines are mechanically
+better to-day than they were a generation ago.
+Then we had not the photogravure and the half-tone
+and the other processes that make our magazines
+beautiful. But we had better taste and also
+we had more leisure.</p>
+
+<p>"I remember when one of the most widely read
+of our magazines was a popular science monthly,
+which printed articles by great scientists on biological
+and other topics. That was in the days
+when Darwin was announcing his theory of evolution&mdash;the
+first great jolt which orthodoxy received.
+People would not take time to read a magazine
+of that sort now. They are so occupied with
+business and dancing and all sorts of occupations
+that they have little leisure for reading."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Chambers stopped talking suddenly and
+laughed. "I'm not a good man for you to bring
+these questions to," he said, "because I never
+have had any special reverence for books or literature
+as such. I reverence the books that I like,
+not all books."</p>
+
+<p>"And have you such a thing as a favorite
+author?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Yes," said Mr. Chambers. "Dumas."</p>
+
+<p>During the 1870's Mr. Chambers was an art<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">83</a></span>
+student in Paris, and he has many interesting
+memories of the French and English writers and
+painters who have made that period memorable.
+He knew Paul Verlaine (whose poetry he greatly
+admires), Charles Conder, and Aubrey Beardsley.</p>
+
+<p>"One day," he said, "I was out on a shooting-trip&mdash;I
+think it was in Belgium&mdash;and I met a
+young English poet, a charming fellow, whose
+work I was later to know and like. It was the
+poet who wrote at least one great poem&mdash;'Cynara'&mdash;it
+was Ernest Dowson.</p>
+
+<p>"I knew many of the Beaux Arts crowd, because
+my brother was a student of architecture at
+the Beaux Arts. And they were a decent, clean
+crowd&mdash;they were not 'decadents.' I do not take
+much stock in the pose of 'decadence,' nor in the
+artistic temperament. I never saw a real artist
+with the artistic temperament. I always associated
+that with weakness."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Chambers, although he has intimate knowledge
+of the Quartier Latin, has little use for
+"Bohemia."</p>
+
+<p>"What is Bohemia?" he asked. "If it is a
+place where a number of artists huddle together
+for the sake of animal warmth, I have nothing to
+say against it. But if it is a place where a number<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">84</a></span>
+of artists come to scorn the world, then it is a
+dangerous thing. The artist should not separate
+himself from the world.</p>
+
+<p>"These artistic and literary cults are wrong.
+I do not believe in professional clubs and cliques.
+If writers form a combination for business reasons,
+that is all right, but a writer should not
+associate exclusively with other writers; he should
+do his work and then go out and see and talk
+to people in other professions. We should sweep
+the cobwebs from the profession of writing and
+not try to fence it in from the public."</p>
+
+<p>To the somewhat trite question as to the effects
+of the war on literature, Mr. Chambers made first
+his usual modest answer, "I don't know." But
+when I told him of the author who had dogmatically
+stated that war always stops literature, and
+that the Civil War had produced no writing worthy
+of preservation, Mr. Chambers reconsidered.</p>
+
+<p>"Did he say that the Civil War had produced
+no literature worthy of preservation?" he said.
+"He must have forgotten that the Civil War
+caused one man to make contributions to our
+literature as valuable as anything we possess.
+He must have forgotten Abraham Lincoln."</p>
+
+<p>Before I left, I mentioned to Mr. Chambers the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">85</a></span>
+theory that literature is better as a staff than as
+a crutch, as an avocation than as a vocation.
+This, like the "inevitable word" theory, is greatly
+beloved by college professors. Mr. Chambers
+said:</p>
+
+<p>"I disagree utterly with that theory. Do you
+remember how Dr. Johnson wrote <i>Rasselas</i>? It
+was in order to raise the money to pay for his
+mother's funeral. I believe that the best work
+is done under pressure. Of course the work must
+be enjoyed; a man in choosing a profession should
+select that sort of work which he prefers to do
+in his leisure moments. Let him do for his lifework
+the task which he would select for his leisure&mdash;and
+let him not take himself too seriously!"</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">88</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">89</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>DETERIORATION OF THE SHORT STORY</i></h2>
+
+<h4>JAMES LANE ALLEN</h4>
+
+<p>That Edgar Allan Poe, in spite of his acknowledged
+genius, has had practically no influence
+on the development of the short story in America,
+and that the current short story written in America
+is inferior to that written during the years between
+1870 and 1895, these are two remarkable statements
+made to me by James Lane Allen, the distinguished
+author of <i>The Choir Invisible</i>, <i>The
+Mettle of the Pasture</i>, and many another memorable
+novel.</p>
+
+<p>I found Mr. Allen in the pleasant workroom
+of his New York residence. Himself a Southerner,
+he is an enthusiastic admirer of the poet whose
+name is inseparably linked with Southern letters.
+But I was soon to find that he does not share the
+opinion of those who consider Poe the originator
+of the modern short story, nor does he rate Poe's
+influence in fiction as very wide.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">90</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"There is always much interest in short stories,"
+he said, "among authors, and in the great body
+of readers. You say that Mr. Gouverneur Morris
+believes that except Poe almost no writer before
+our generation could write short stories.</p>
+
+<p>"I do not wish to be placed in a position of
+publicly criticizing Mr. Gouverneur Morris's opinion
+of the short story. But it may not seem antagonistic
+to the opinion of any one to call attention
+to the fact that, of all American short stories
+yet written, the two most widely known in and
+outside our country were written independently
+of Poe. These are <i>The Man Without a Country</i>
+and <i>Rip Van Winkle</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"As the technique of the American short story
+is understood and applied to-day, neither of these
+two stories can be regarded as a work of impeccable
+art. But flaws have not kept them from fame.
+By a common verdict the flawless short stories of
+the day are fameless. Certainly, also, Hawthorne
+was uninfluenced by Poe in writing short stories
+that remain secure among brief American classics.</p>
+
+<p>"This, of course, is limiting the outlook to our
+own literature. Beyond our literature, what of
+Balzac? In the splendor of his achievements with
+the novel, Balzac has perhaps been slighted as a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">91</a></span>
+master of the short story. Think, for instance, of
+such a colossal fragment as <i>The Atheists Mass</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"And what of Boccaccio? For centuries before
+Poe, the <i>Decameron</i> shone before the eyes of the
+world as the golden treasury of model forms for
+the short story.</p>
+
+<p>"And centuries before Boccaccio, flashing from
+hand to hand all over the world, there was a
+greater treasury still, the treasury of <i>The Arabian
+Nights</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"It is no disparagement to Poe to say that his
+genius did not originate the genius of the short
+story. His true place, his logical place, in the
+development of the short story is that of a man
+with ancestors&mdash;naturally!</p>
+
+<p>"Since there is a breath of nativity blowing
+through his stories, I think it is the breath of far
+distant romance from somewhere. Certainly his
+stories are as remote from our civilization and from
+all things American as are Oriental tales."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Allen showed he had given much thought
+to Edgar Allan Poe's place among the American
+fiction writers, so I thought that he might also
+have some interesting things to say about Poe
+as a poet. He had. He mentioned a quality of
+Poe's verse which for some reason or other seems<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">92</a></span>
+heretofore to have escaped the notice of students
+of American poetry.</p>
+
+<p>"It may be worth while calling attention," he
+said, "to the fact that nearly all of Poe's poems
+belong to the night. Twelve o'clock noon never
+strikes to his poetic genius. His best poems are
+Poe's Nights, if not <i>Arabian Nights</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"There is a saying that the German novel long
+ago died of the full moon. To Poe the dead
+moon was the orb of life. The sun blotted him
+out."</p>
+
+<p>Great as is his admiration for Poe's genius, Mr.
+Allen does not believe he has greatly influenced
+American prose. He said:</p>
+
+<p>"As to the influence of Poe's short stories in
+our country, this seems to be a tradition mainly
+fostered by professors of English in American
+universities and by the historians of our literature.
+The tradition does not prevail among American
+writers. Actually there is no traceable stamp of
+the influence of his prose writings on the work
+of any American short-story writer known to me,
+save one. That one is Ambrose Bierce."</p>
+
+<p>"Why is it," I asked, "that Poe's influence on
+American fiction has been so slight?"</p>
+
+<p>"The main reason," Mr. Allen answered, "why<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">93</a></span>
+Poe's stories have remained outside American
+imitation or emulation is perhaps because they
+are projected outside American sympathies. They
+lie to-day where they lay when they were written&mdash;beyond
+the confines of what the German calls
+the literature of the soil.</p>
+
+<p>"Poe and Ambrose Bierce are at least to be
+linked in this: that they are the two greatest
+and the two coldest of all American short-story
+writers. Any living American fictionist will perhaps
+bear testimony to the fact that he has never
+met any other writer who has been influenced
+by the stories of Poe."</p>
+
+<p>"Mr. Allen," I said, "you believe that the
+American short story has not been influenced by
+Poe; has the American short story, however, improved
+since his time?"</p>
+
+<p>"The renascence of the American short story,"
+said Mr. Allen, thoughtfully, "its real efflorescence
+as a natural literary art form, took place after the
+close of the Civil War. The historians of our
+literature have, perhaps, as is customary with
+them, held to the strict continuity of tradition as
+explaining this renascence. If so, they have
+omitted one of the instinctive forces of human
+nature, which invariably act in nations that have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">94</a></span>
+literatures and act ungovernably at the termination
+of all wars.</p>
+
+<p>"After any war spontaneity in story-telling is
+one of the ungovernable impulses of human nature.
+This can be traced from modern literature back
+to primitive man returning from his feuds. When
+he had no literature, he carved his story on the
+walls of his cave or on a bone to tell the glory of
+the fight. Before he could even carve a bone he
+hung up a row of the heads of the defeated. Perhaps
+the original form of the war short story was
+a good, thick volume of heads. Within our own
+civilization the American Indian told his short
+stories in this way&mdash;with American heads or tufts
+of scalps&mdash;a sad way of telling them for our forefathers.</p>
+
+<p>"At the close of the American Civil War the
+atmosphere, both North and South, was charged
+with stories. The amazing fact is not that short
+stories should have begun at that time, but that
+they should have begun with such perfection.
+This perfection expressed itself more richly during
+the period, say, from 1870 to 1895&mdash;twenty-five
+years&mdash;than it has ever done since.</p>
+
+<p>"The evidence is at hand that the best of the
+American short stories written during that period<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">95</a></span>
+outweigh in value those that have been written
+later&mdash;with the exception of those of one man.
+And this evidence takes this form&mdash;that these
+stories were collected into volumes, had an enormous
+sale, had the highest critical appreciation,
+have passed into the histories of literature written
+since, have gone into the courses of English literature
+now being taught in the universities, and are
+still steadily being sold.</p>
+
+<p>"Is this true of the best short stories being
+written now? Are any of the short stories written
+since that period being bound into volumes and
+extensively sold? Do the professors of English
+literature recommend them to their classes? That
+is the practical test.</p>
+
+<p>"The one exception is O. Henry. He alone
+stands out in the later period as a world within
+himself; as much apart from any one else as are
+Hawthorne and Poe."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Allen did not express an opinion as to the
+probable effects on literature of the war. He said:</p>
+
+<p>"Now, the North and the South in the renascence
+of the short story after the Civil War divide
+honors about equally. But it is impossible
+to speak of the Southern short story, or indeed of
+Southern literature at all, without being brought<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">96</a></span>
+to the brink of a subject which lies back of the
+whole philosophy of Southern literature."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Allen paused for a moment. Then he continued,
+speaking with an intensity which reminded
+me of his Southern birth and upbringing:</p>
+
+<p>"Suppose that at the end of the present European
+war Germany should be victorious and France
+defeated. And suppose that in France there
+should not be left a single publishing-house, a
+single literary periodical, a single literary editor,
+a single critic, and scarcely even a single buyer
+of books.</p>
+
+<p>"And suppose that the defeated French people
+wanted to cry out their soul over their defeat and
+against their conquerors. And suppose that in
+order to do this every French novelist, short-story
+writer, or poet, unable to keep silent, should
+begin to write and begin to send his novel or his
+short story or his poem over into Germany to
+be read by a German editor, published by a German
+publisher, and sold in a German bookshop
+to a German reader. What kind of French literature
+of the war do you think would appear in
+Germany and be fostered there?</p>
+
+<p>"But this is exactly what happened after the
+war between the North and the South.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">97</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"The few voices that began to be sent northward
+across the demolished battle-line could only
+be the voices that would be listened to and welcomed
+on the other side. That is the reason why
+that first literature was so mild, so tempered, so
+thin, so devitalized, that it seemed not to come
+from an enraged people, but from the memories
+of their ghosts.</p>
+
+<p>"As a result of finding war literature inexpressible
+in such conditions, the young generation
+of Southerners dropped the theme of war altogether
+and explored other paths. So that perhaps
+the most original and spontaneous fragments
+of this new Southern post-bellum literature are
+in the regions of the imagination, where no note
+of war is heard.</p>
+
+<p>"It is not beyond the bounds of possibility
+that if Joel Chandler Harris, a young Southerner,
+had possessed full freedom to wreak his genius
+on the war, the world might never have heard of
+'Uncle Remus.' The world might never have
+known that among the cotton-plantations there
+dwelt a brother to Æsop and to La Fontaine."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">100</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">101</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>SOME HARMFUL INFLUENCES</i></h2>
+
+<h4>HARRY LEON WILSON</h4>
+
+
+<p>From the Pacific Coast&mdash;from what is enthusiastically
+termed "the Golden West"&mdash;from
+that section of the United States which is
+large and chivalrous and gladly suffers suffrage&mdash;comes
+a voice, replying to my question: "What
+is the matter with contemporary fiction?"</p>
+
+<p>And the voice says, "<i>Cherchez la femme!</i>"</p>
+
+<p>It is the voice of Mr. Harry Leon Wilson, author
+of <i>Bunker Bean</i>, <i>Ruggles of Red Gap</i>, and many
+another popular novel, and co-author with Mr.
+Booth Tarkington of several successful plays. Mr.
+Wilson believes that the dullness and insincerity
+of our novels are due to the taste of most of their
+readers&mdash;that is, to the taste of the women.</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. Wilson what, in his opinion, was
+the influence most harmful to the development of
+literature in America.</p>
+
+<p>"I know little about literature," Mr. Wilson<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">102</a></span>
+replied, "but if you mean the novel, I should say
+the intense satisfaction with it as it is, of the
+maker, the seller, and the buyer. And to trace
+this baneful satisfaction to its source, I should say
+it lies in the lack of a cultivated taste in our women
+readers of fiction.</p>
+
+<p>"Publishers are agreed, I believe, that women
+buy the great bulk of their output. The current
+novel is as deliberately planned to please the
+woman buyer as is any other bit of trade goods.
+The publisher knows what she wants to read,
+the writer finds out from the publisher, and you
+can see the result in the advertisements&mdash;and the
+writer's royalty statements.</p>
+
+<p>"'We want,' says the publisher, 'a stunning
+girl for the cover and a corking good love interest
+to catch the women.' (Publishers do talk that
+way when they have safely locked themselves in
+their low dens.)</p>
+
+<p>"This love interest is always said to be wholesome
+and sweet. I don't know. Certainly it is
+sweet enough. In the trade novel it's as if you
+took a segment of rich layer cake, the chocolate-and-jelly
+kind, poured over it a half-pint of nice
+thick molasses, and then, just to make sure,
+sprinkled this abundantly with fine sugar.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">103</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Anyway, that's what the publisher has found&mdash;and
+he has the best means of knowing&mdash;that
+the American woman will buy year in and year
+out. And you can't blame him for printing it.
+A publisher with ideals of his own couldn't last
+any longer than a grocer with ideals of his own,
+or a clergyman.</p>
+
+<p>"And least of all can you blame the author for
+writing this slush, because nine times out of ten
+he doesn't know any better. How should he,
+with no one to tell him?</p>
+
+<p>"And that," said Mr. Wilson, "is another evil
+almost as great in its influence as the undeveloped
+taste of our women readers. I mean our lack of
+authoritative criticism. Now we really do get a
+good novel once in a blue moon, but one who has
+been made wary by the mass of trade novels
+would never suspect it from reading our book
+reviews. The good novel, it is true, is praised
+heartily, but then so are all the bad novels&mdash;and
+how is one to tell?</p>
+
+<p>"At least eighty-five per cent. of our book reviews
+are mere amiable, perfunctory echoes of the
+enthusiastic 'canned' review which the publisher
+obligingly prints on the paper jacket of his best
+seller. I sometimes suspect this task is allotted<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">104</a></span>
+to a member of the staff who is known to be 'fond
+of reading.'</p>
+
+<p>"Another evil influence is often alleged&mdash;the
+pressure the business office puts on the reviewer
+to be tender with novels that are lavishly advertised,
+but I have never thought there was more
+than a grain of truth in this.</p>
+
+<p>"Perhaps a publisher wouldn't continue to
+patronize a sheet that habitually blurted out the
+truth about his best sellers, but I really doubt
+that this was ever put to an issue. I don't believe
+the average book-reviewer knows any better
+than the average novelist the difference between
+a good and a bad novel.</p>
+
+<p>"It isn't so with the other arts. We have
+critics for those. Music, sculpture, painting&mdash;we
+know the best and get the best.</p>
+
+<p>"But, then, the novel is scarcely considered to
+be an art form. Any one can&mdash;and does&mdash;write
+a novel, if he can only find the time. It isn't supposed
+to be a thing one must study, like plumbing
+or architecture.</p>
+
+<p>"The novelist who wants to write a best seller
+this year studies the best seller of last year, and
+wisely, because that is what the publisher wants&mdash;something
+like his last one that sold big. He<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">105</a></span>
+is looking for it night and day and for nothing
+else. He wants good carpenters who have followed
+the design that women have liked. Fiction
+is the one art you don't take seriously, and there
+is no one to tell us we should; there are no critics
+to inform the writers and the readers and make
+the publishers timid.</p>
+
+<p>"True, we have in this country two or three,
+possibly four, critics who can speak with authority,
+men who know what the novel has been,
+what it is with us, what it ought to be. One of
+them is a friend of mine, and I reproached him
+lately for not speaking out in meeting oftener.</p>
+
+<p>"His defense was pathetic. First, that ninety
+out of a hundred of our novels are beneath criticism.
+Second, as to the remaining ten that would
+merit the rapier instead of the bludgeon&mdash;'criticism
+is harder to sell than post-meridian virtue.
+I have tried.'</p>
+
+<p>"And he has to eat as often as any publisher.
+So there you are! People are not going to pay
+him for finding fault with something they are
+intensely satisfied with. It all comes back to the
+women. When their taste is corrected we shall
+have better novels. But not before then!"</p>
+
+<p>"Mr. Wilson," I said, "do you believe that the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">106</a></span>
+development of the magazine, with its high prices
+and serialization, has been harmful or beneficial
+to fiction?"</p>
+
+<p>"In the first place, the magazine hasn't developed,"
+he answered. "It has merely multiplied&mdash;the
+cheap ones, I mean. And prices have
+not increased except to about a dozen of our
+national favorites. Where there is one writer who
+can get fifteen hundred dollars for a short story,
+or fifteen thousand dollars for the serial rights to
+a novel, there are a thousand who can get not
+more than a fifteenth of those prices.</p>
+
+<p>"On the whole, I think that the effect of the
+cheap monthlies has been good. They are the
+only ones that welcome the new writer. They
+try him out. Then, if the public takes to him,
+the better magazines find it out after a while and
+form an alliance with him&mdash;that is, if his characters
+are so sweet and wholesome that the magazine
+can still be left on the center-table where
+Cuthbert or Berryl might see it after school.</p>
+
+<p>"Nowadays I never expect to find a good short
+story in any of the cheap magazines. Of course,
+it does happen now and then, but not often enough
+to make me impatient for their coming. And, of
+course, the cheap monthlies do print, for the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">107</a></span>
+most part, what are probably the worst short
+stories that will ever be written in the world&mdash;the
+very furthest from anything real.</p>
+
+<p>"These writers, too, like the novelists, study
+one another instead of life. We will say one of
+them writes a short story about a pure young
+shopgirl of flower-like beauty who, spending an
+evening of innocent recreation in a notorious
+Tenderloin dive (one of those places that I, for
+one, have never been able to find), is insulted by
+the leader of Tammany Hall, who is always hanging
+around there for evil purposes. At the last
+moment she is saved from his loathsome advances
+by a dashing young stranger in a cute-cut blue
+serge suit, who carries her off in a taxicab and
+marries her at 2 <span class="smcap">A.M.</span> And he, of course, proves
+to be the great traction magnate who owns all
+the city's surface-car lines.</p>
+
+<p>"The other writers, and some new ones that
+never before thought of writing, read this story,
+which is called 'All for Love,' and learn to do the
+'type'&mdash;the pure young shopgirl, a bit slangy in
+spite of her flower-like beauty; the abhorrent politician
+(some day he will have a distressing mix-up
+with his very own daughter in one of these evil
+places&mdash;see if he doesn't!), the low-browed dive-keeper,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">108</a></span>
+and the honest young traction magnate.
+They will learn with a little practice to do these
+as the dupes of the 'Be-a-cartoonist!' schools
+learn to draw 'An Irishman,' 'A German,' 'A
+Jew,' and the dental façade of Colonel Roosevelt.</p>
+
+<p>"But we must remember that O. Henry came
+to us from the cheap magazines, never did get
+into the higher-priced ones, and was, by the way,
+wretchedly paid for his stories. True, he received
+good prices in his later days, but I doubt if they
+raised the average for his output to two hundred
+dollars a story. He neglected to come to the feast
+in a wedding garment, so the more pretentious
+magazines would have none of him.</p>
+
+<p>"For one O. Henry, then, we can forgive the
+lesser monthlies for the bulk of their stuff that
+can be read only by born otoliths. The more
+magazines, the better our chance of finding the
+new man, and only in the cheap ones can he
+come to life."</p>
+
+<p>Many dogmatic statements have been made
+concerning the great American novel. I have
+been told that it would come from the South, that
+it would come from the West, that it would never
+be written. But Mr. Wilson has a new and
+revolutionary theory.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">109</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Will there," I asked, "ever be the great
+American novel? That is, will there ever be a
+novel which reflects American life as adequately
+as <i>Vanity Fair</i> reflects English life?"</p>
+
+<p>"There have already been dozens of them!"
+was Mr. Wilson's emphatic reply. "To go no
+farther back, Booth Tarkington wrote one the
+other day, and so did Theodore Dreiser. (Dreiser's
+story, 'The "Genius,"' of course couldn't have
+appeared in any American magazine. Trust your
+canny publisher not to let his magazine hand
+know what his book hand is doing!)</p>
+
+<p>"But let us lay forever that dear old question
+that has haunted our literary columns for so many
+years. The answer, of course, is that there is no
+novel that reflects English life any more adequately
+than <i>The Turmoil</i>, or '<i>The Genius</i>,' or <i>The
+Virginian</i>, or <i>Perch of the Devil</i>, or <i>Unleavened
+Bread</i>, or <i>The Rise of Silas Lapham</i> reflects American
+life.</p>
+
+<p>"Certainly <i>Vanity Fair</i> doesn't do this. It reflects
+but a very narrow section of London life.
+For the purposes of fictional portrayal England
+is just as big and difficult&mdash;as impossible in one
+novel&mdash;as the United States.</p>
+
+<p>"To know England through fiction one must<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">110</a></span>
+go to all her artists, past and present, getting a
+little from each. Hardy gives us an England that
+Thackeray never suspected, and Galsworthy gives
+us still another, not to go on to the England of
+George Moore, Phillpotts, Quiller-Couch, Wells,
+Bennett, Walpole, George, or Mackenzie. I hope
+at the proper time that a tasteful little tablet will
+be erected to my memory for having laid this
+ancient and highly respectable apparition."</p>
+
+<p>In his interesting contribution to a symposium
+of opinions as to what are the six best novels in
+the English language, Mr. Wilson had some things
+to say about Dickens which were not likely to
+bring him a vote of thanks from the Dickens
+Fellowship. I wished to have his opinion of
+Dickens stated more definitely, and so, basing
+my question on a statement he had made in the
+symposium, I asked, "What qualities in the work
+of Charles Dickens make him a bad model for
+novelists to follow?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Wilson replied: "Dickens has been a blight
+to most writers who were susceptible to his vices.
+He was a great humorist, but an inferior novelist,
+and countless other inferior novelists have believed
+that they could be great humorists by following
+his childishly easy formula.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">111</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"That is, those who were influenced by him
+copy his faults. Witness our school of characterization
+based on the Dickens method, a school
+holding that 'character' is a mere trick of giving
+your creation exaggerated mannerisms or physical
+surfaces&mdash;as with Dickens it was rarely anything
+else.</p>
+
+<p>"Dickens created vaudeville 'characters'&mdash;unsurpassed
+for twenty-minute sketches, deadly beyond
+that to the mentally mature. His stock in
+trade was the grotesque make-up. In stage talk
+he couldn't create a 'straight' part.</p>
+
+<p>"Strip his people of their make-ups, verbal,
+hirsute, sartorial, surgical, pathological, what
+not&mdash;and dummies remain. Meet them once and
+you know them for the rest of the tale, the Micawbers,
+Gamps, Pecksniffs, Nicklebys; each has his
+stunt and does it over and over at each new
+meeting, to the&mdash;for me, at least&mdash;maddening delay
+of the melodrama. I like melodrama as well
+as any one, badgered heroines, falsely accused
+heroes, missing wills, trap-doors, disguised philanthropists,
+foul murders, and even slow-dying
+children who are not only moralists, but orators;
+and I like to see the villain get his at last, and get
+it good; but I can't read Dickens any more, because<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">112</a></span>
+the tale must be held up every five minutes
+for one of the funny 'characters' to do his stunt.</p>
+
+<p>"How many years will it take us&mdash;writers, I
+mean&mdash;to realize that there are no characters in
+Dickens in the sense that Dmitri in <i>The Brothers
+Caramazov</i> is a character? How few of our current
+novelists can distinguish between the soulless
+caricaturing of Dickens and the genuine character-drawing
+of a Turgenieff or a Dostoievski!</p>
+
+<p>"How few of us can see how the soul of Dmitri
+is slowly unfolded to the reader with never a bit
+of make-up! To this moment, I don't know if
+he wore a beard or not; but I know the man.
+Dickens would have given him funny whiskers,
+astigmatism, a shortened leg, a purple nose, and
+still to make sure we wouldn't mistake him a
+catch phrase for his utterance.</p>
+
+<p>"Any novelist who has mastered the rudiments
+of his craft, even though he hasn't an atom of
+humor in his make-up, can write a Dickens novel,
+and any publisher will print it for the Christmas
+trade if it's fairly workman-like, and it will be
+warmly praised in the reviews. That happens
+every season.</p>
+
+<p>"And that's why Dickens is a bad model. If
+one must have a model, why not Hall Caine, infinitely<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">113</a></span>
+the superior of Dickens as a craftsman?
+Of course, having no humor, he can't be read by
+people who have, but he knows his trade, where
+Dickens was a preposterous blunderer."</p>
+
+<p>Charles Belmont Davis once told me that a
+novelist should have some other regular occupation
+besides writing. I asked Mr. Wilson his
+opinion on this subject.</p>
+
+<p>"Mr. Davis didn't originate this theory," he
+said. "It's older than he is. Anyway, I don't
+believe in it. I know of no business to-day that
+would leave a man time to write novels, and a
+novelist worth his salt won't have time for any
+other business.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course, the ideal novelist would at one
+time or another have been anything. The ideal
+novelist has two passions, people and words, and
+he should have had and should continue to have
+as many points of contact with life as possible.
+But if he has reached the point where he can
+write to please me, I want him not to waste time
+doing anything else.</p>
+
+<p>"Personally, I wish I might have been, for varying
+intervals, a Russian Grand Duke, an Eighth
+Avenue undertaker, the manager of a five-and-ten-cent
+store, a head waiter, a burglar, a desk sergeant<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">114</a></span>
+at the Thirtieth Street Police Station, and
+a malefactor of great wealth, preferably one that
+gets into the snapshots at Newport, reading from
+left to right. But Heaven has denied me practically
+all of these avenues to a knowledge of my
+humankind, and I am too busy keeping up with
+the current styles of all millinery fiction to take
+to any of them at this late day.</p>
+
+<p>"Besides, I have a bad example to deter me,
+having just read <i>The High Priestess</i>, by Robert
+Grant, who has another business than novel writing&mdash;something
+connected with the law, I believe,
+in Boston. I have no means of knowing how
+valuable a civic unit he may have been in his
+home town, but I do feel that he has cheated the
+world of a great deal by keeping to this other
+business, whatever it may be.</p>
+
+<p>"From the author of <i>Unleavened Bread</i> we once
+had a right to expect much. But <i>The High
+Priestess</i> chiefly makes me regret that he didn't
+have to write novels or starve; by its virtues of
+construction, which are many and admirable, and
+by its utter lack of power to communicate any
+emotion whatsoever, which is conspicuous and
+lamentable. He seems to have written his novel
+with an adding-machine, and instinctively I blame<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">115</a></span>
+that 'other business' of his, in which he seems to
+have forgotten&mdash;for he did know it once&mdash;that a
+novelist may or may not think straight, but he
+must feel.</p>
+
+<p>"Perhaps he wasn't a real novelist, after all.
+I suspect a real novelist would starve in any
+other business."</p>
+
+<p>I told Mr. Wilson that a prominent American
+humorist writer had classed Mark Twain with
+Artemus Ward and Philander Doesticks, and said
+that these men were not genuine humorists, but
+"the Charlie Chaplins of their time."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Wilson smiled. "Isn't this rather high
+praise for Charlie Chaplin?" he asked. "How far
+is this idolatry of the movie actor to go, anyway?
+True, Mr. Chaplin is a skilled comedian, pre-eminent
+in his curious new profession, but to my
+thinking he lacks repose at those supreme moments
+when he is battering the faces of his fellow-histrions
+with the wet mop or the stuffed club,
+or walking on their stomachs; but I may be
+prejudiced. I know I shouldn't have ranked him
+with Mark Twain, arch-humanist and satirist
+and one of the few literary artists who have attained
+the world stature&mdash;so that we must go back
+and back to Cervantes to find his like."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">118</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">119</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>THE PASSING OF THE SNOB</i></h2>
+
+<h4>EDWARD S. MARTIN</h4>
+
+<p>If William Makepeace Thackeray were alive
+to-day he would not write a <i>Book of Snobs</i>.
+He might write a <i>Book of Reformers</i>.</p>
+
+<p>This is the opinion of that shrewd and kindly
+satirist, Edward S. Martin. I found him not in
+New York, the city whose lights and shadows are
+reflected in much of his graceful prose and pungent
+verse, but out among the Connecticut hills.
+In the pleasant study of his quaint Colonial cottage
+he talked about the thing he delights to observe&mdash;humanity.</p>
+
+<p>"Thackeray would not write a <i>Book of Snobs</i>
+to-day," he said. "The snob is not now the appealing
+subject that he was in the early days of
+the reign of Queen Victoria. Thackeray could
+not now find enough snobs and snobbery to write
+about, either in England or in America. Snobs
+are by way of having punctured tires these days.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">120</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Don't you think that the snobs were always
+very much apart from our civilization and national
+ideals? They were a symptom of an established
+and conservative society. And this established
+and conservative society Thackeray in his way
+helped to break down.</p>
+
+<p>"To-day, in England and in the United States,
+that kind of society is in a precarious condition.
+If Thackeray were now writing, he would not
+satirize snobs. It is more likely that he would
+satirize the reformers. I think that all the snobs
+have hit the sawdust trail."</p>
+
+<p>"How did this happen?" I asked. "What was
+it that did away with the snobs?"</p>
+
+<p>"It was largely a natural process of change,"
+said Mr. Martin. "The snobs were put on the
+defensive. You see, there is a harder push of
+democracy now than there was in Thackeray's
+time. The world of which the snob was so conspicuous
+a part seems, especially since the war
+began, to have passed away. Of course the literature
+of that world is not dead, but for the moment
+it seems obsolete.</p>
+
+<p>"To-day the whole attention of civilized mankind
+is fixed on the great fundamental problems;
+there is no time for snobbery. For one thing,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">121</a></span>
+there is the problem of national self-preservation.
+And there has recently been before the civilized
+world, more strongly than ever before, the great
+problem of the development of democracy.</p>
+
+<p>"I suppose that the war will check, to a certain
+extent, the development of democracy. In
+England the great task of the hour is to organize
+all the powers of society for defense against attack,
+against attack by a power organized for forty
+years for that attack.</p>
+
+<p>"I suppose England will get organization out
+of this war. And if we get into the war, we'll get
+organization out of it."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Martin is generally thought of as a critic
+of social rather than political conditions. But he
+is keenly interested in politics. Speaking of
+American politics and the possibility of America's
+entering the war, he said:</p>
+
+<p>"For the past fifteen years our greatest activity
+in politics has been to rip things open. It seemed
+to most people that the organization was getting
+too strong and that it was controlled by too few
+people. The fight has been against that condition.</p>
+
+<p>"But if we became involved in a serious war
+trouble the energy of our people would be directed
+to an attempt to secure increased efficiency. We<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">122</a></span>
+would become closely organized again. I don't
+think we'd lose the benefit of what has been done
+in the past years, but we would come to a turn
+in the road.</p>
+
+<p>"I suppose it would bring us all together, if
+we got into this war, and I suppose we'd get some
+good out of it.</p>
+
+<p>"You see, the people who formerly directed our
+Government haven't had much power for several
+years. Now they are valuable people. And they
+will come back into power again, but with greatly
+modified conditions.</p>
+
+<p>"I don't think that a new set of people are
+going to manage the affairs of the nation. I
+think that the affairs of the nation will be managed
+by the people who managed them before.
+But these people will be much more under control
+than they were before, and they will be subject
+to new laws.</p>
+
+<p>"How much good government by commission
+is going to do I don't know. We have not as
+yet had good enough men to enter into this important
+work, and the best of those who have
+entered have not stayed in this employment. So
+the development of experts in government has not
+come along as well as people hoped it would."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">123</a></span></p>
+
+<p>The genial philosopher smiled quizzically and
+rose from his chair.</p>
+
+<p>"I'm afraid I'm getting too political," he said,
+pacing slowly up and down the room. "Let's
+get back to snobs and snobbery.</p>
+
+<p>"You asked me a few minutes ago why the
+snob had become so inconspicuous a figure in our
+modern society. Well, I know one reason for
+this altered condition of affairs. Woman has
+abolished the snob. Woman has changed man."</p>
+
+<p>"And what changed woman?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Many things; the development of machinery,
+for instance," he replied. "Woman has not
+changed so much as the conditions of life have
+changed.</p>
+
+<p>"The development of machinery has caused
+changes that impress me deeply. It has produced
+immense alterations in the conditions of
+life and in the relations between people.</p>
+
+<p>"War has been changed in a striking manner
+by this development of machinery. Never in the
+history of warfare was machinery so prominent
+and important as to-day. In fact, I think I am
+justified in speaking of this war as a machine-bore!</p>
+
+<p>"Machinery really has had a great deal to do<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">124</a></span>
+with changing the condition and activities of
+woman, and has been a powerful influence in
+bringing about the modern movement for women's
+suffrage. Machinery has changed the employment
+of women and forced them into kinds of
+work which are not domestic.</p>
+
+<p>"The typewriter and the telephone have revolutionized
+our methods of doing business. The
+typewriter and the telephone have filled our offices
+with women. They are doing work which twenty
+years ago would have been considered most
+unfeminine.</p>
+
+<p>"The war is strengthening this tendency of
+women to take up work that is not domestic. I
+have heard it said that women first got into the
+undomestic kinds of business in France during
+the Napoleonic wars. Napoleon wanted to have
+all the men out in the line of battle, so he had girls
+instructed in bookkeeping and other kinds of
+office work.</p>
+
+<p>"The business activities of Frenchwomen date
+from that time. And a similar result seems to
+be coming out of this war. In France, in England,
+in all the countries engaged in the war
+the women are filling the positions left vacant
+by the men."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">125</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Do you think," I asked, "that this is a good
+thing for civilization, this increased activity of
+women in business?"</p>
+
+<p>"I don't know," said Mr. Martin, musingly.
+"I don't know. But I do know this, that the
+main employment of woman is to rear a family.
+Office work, administrative work&mdash;these things
+are of only secondary importance. The one
+vital thing for women to do is to rear families.
+They must do this if the human race is to continue."</p>
+
+<p>"Mr. Martin," I said, "you told me that
+Thackeray, if he were alive, would satirize the
+reformers. Just what sort of reformer is it that
+has taken the place of the snob?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Martin did not at once answer. He smiled,
+as if enjoying some entertaining memory. Then
+he started to speak, and mentioned the name of
+a prominent reformer. But his New England
+caution checked him. He said:</p>
+
+<p>"No, I'd better not say anything about that.
+I'd rather not. I'd rather say that the things
+that the snobs admired and particularly embodied
+have lost prestige during the last twenty years.</p>
+
+<p>"After 1898, after our great rise to prosperity,
+the captains of industry and of finance were the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">126</a></span>
+great men of the country. But I think these great
+men are less stunning now than they were then.
+And money is less stunning, too.</p>
+
+<p>"All the business of money-making has had a
+great loss of prestige since 1900. People think
+more of other things. And the people who are
+thinking of other things than money-making have
+more of a 'punch' than they had before. The
+wise have more of a punch, and so have the
+foolish."</p>
+
+<p>Again came that reminiscent smile. "Reformers
+can be very trying," he said. "Very trying,
+indeed. Did you ever read Brand Whitlock's
+<i>Forty Years of It</i>? Brand Whitlock had his own
+trials with the reformers. Whitlock is a sensible,
+generous man, and his attitude toward reformers
+is a good deal humorous and not at all violent.
+That would be Thackeray's attitude toward them,
+I think, if he were living to-day. He'd satirize
+the reformers instead of the snobs."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Martin is not inclined to condemn or to
+accept absolutely any of the modern reform movements.
+"All reform movements," he said, "run
+until they get a check. Then they stop. But
+what they have accomplished is not lost."</p>
+
+<p>The society women who undertake sociological<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">127</a></span>
+reform work find in Mr. Martin no unsympathetic
+critic.</p>
+
+<p>"These wealthy women," he said, "take up
+reform work as a recourse. Society life is not
+very filling. They have a sense of emptiness.
+So they go in for reform, to fill out their lives more
+adequately.</p>
+
+<p>"But I don't know that I'd call that kind of
+thing reform. I'd call it a large form of social
+activity. These women are attending to a great
+mass of people who need this attention. But the
+bulk of this kind of work is too small for it to be
+called reform.</p>
+
+<p>"In New York there are very many young
+people who need care and leadership. The neglected
+and incompetent must be looked after.
+The old-fashioned family control has been considerably
+loosened, and an attempt must be made
+to guard those who are therefore less protected
+than they would have been a generation ago.
+Certainly these efforts to look after young people
+who don't have enough care taken of them by
+their families are directed in the right direction."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. Martin what he thought of the
+present condition of American literature, particularly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">128</a></span>
+the work presented to the public on the
+pages of magazines.</p>
+
+<p>"Just now," he said, "the newspapers seem to
+have almost everything. The great interest of the
+last few years has been in the newspapers. They
+have had a tremendous story to tell, they have
+told it every day, and other things have seemed,
+in comparison, flat and lifeless.</p>
+
+<p>"It has been a hard time for every sort of a
+publication not absolutely up to the minute all
+the time. The newspapers have had the field
+almost to themselves.</p>
+
+<p>"And I think that the newspapers have greatly
+improved. They have had an immense chance,
+and it has been very stimulating."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">130</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">131</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>COMMERCIALIZING THE SEX INSTINCT</i></h2>
+
+<h4>ROBERT HERRICK</h4>
+
+<p>"Realism," said Robert Herrick, "is not
+the celebration of sexuality." I had not recalled
+to earth that merry divine whose lyric invitation
+to go a-Maying still echoes in the heart
+of every lover of poetry. The Robert Herrick
+with whom I was talking is a poet and a discriminating
+critic of poetry, but the world knows
+him chiefly for his novels&mdash;<i>The Common Lot</i>,
+<i>Together</i>, <i>Clark's Field</i>, and other intimate studies
+of American life and character. He is a realist,
+and not many years ago there were critics who
+thought that his manner of dealing with sexual
+themes was dangerously frank. Therefore, the
+statement that he had just made seemed to me
+particularly significant.</p>
+
+<p>"It seems to have become the fashion," he
+said, "to apply the term Realist to every writer
+who is obsessed with sex. I think I know the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">132</a></span>
+reason for this. Our Anglo-Saxon prudery kept
+all mention of sex relations out of our fiction
+for many years. Among comparatively modern
+novelists the realists were the first to break the
+shackles of this convention, and write frankly of
+sex. And from this it has come, most unfortunately,
+that realism and pornography are often
+confused by novelists and critics as well as by
+the public.</p>
+
+<p>"This confusion of ideas was apparent in some
+of the criticisms of my novel <i>Together</i>. In an
+early chapter of the book there was an incident
+which was intended to show that the man and
+woman who were the chief figures in the book
+were spiritually incompatible, that their relations
+as husband and wife would be wrong. This was,
+in fact, the theme of the book, and this incident
+in the first chapter was intended to foreshadow the
+later events of their married life. Well, the
+critics who disliked this chapter said that what
+they objected to was its 'gross realism.'</p>
+
+<p>"Now, as a matter of fact, that part of the
+book was not realistic at all. I was describing
+something unusual, abnormal, while realism has
+to do with the normal. The critic had, of course,
+a perfect right to believe that the subject ought<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">133</a></span>
+not to be treated at all, but 'gross realism' was
+the most inappropriate description possible.</p>
+
+<p>"Undoubtedly there are many writers who believe
+that they are realists because they write
+about nothing but sex. Undoubtedly, too, there
+are many writers who are conscious of the commercial
+value of sex in literature. Of course a
+writer ought to be conscious of the sex impulse
+in life, but he ought not to display it constantly.
+I wish our writers would pay less attention to the
+direct manifestations of sex and more to its indirect
+influence, to the ways in which it affects all
+phases of activity."</p>
+
+<p>"Who are some of the writers who seem to you
+to be especially ready to avail themselves of the
+commercial value of sex?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Herrick smiled. "I think you know the
+writers I mean without my mentioning their
+names," he said. "They write for widely circulated
+magazines, and make a great deal of money,
+and their success is due almost entirely to their
+industrious celebration of sexual affairs. You
+know the sort of magazine for which they write&mdash;it
+always has on the cover a highly colored
+picture of a pretty woman, never anything else.
+That, too, is an example, and a rather wearying<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">134</a></span>
+example, of the commercializing of the sex
+appeal.</p>
+
+<p>"I think that Zola, although he was a great
+artist, was often conscious of the business value
+of the sex theme. He knew that that sort of
+thing had a tremendous appeal, and, for me,
+much of his best work is marred by his deliberate
+introduction of sex, with the purpose&mdash;which, of
+course, he realized&mdash;of making a sensation and
+selling large editions of his books. This sort of
+commercialism was not found in the great Russian
+realists, the true realist&mdash;Dostoievski, for example.
+But it is found in the work of some of the modern
+Russian writers who are incorrectly termed
+realists."</p>
+
+<p>"Mr. Herrick," I asked, "just what is a
+realist?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Herrick's youthful face, which contrasts
+strangely with his white hair, took on a thoughtful
+expression.</p>
+
+<p>"The distinction between realism and romanticism,"
+he said, "is one of spirit rather than of
+method. The realist has before him an aim
+which is entirely different from that of the romanticist.</p>
+
+<p>"The realist writes a novel with one purpose in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">135</a></span>
+view. And that purpose is to render into written
+words the normal aspect of things.</p>
+
+<p>"The aim of the romanticist is entirely different.
+He is concerned only with things which
+are exciting, astonishing&mdash;in a word, abnormal.</p>
+
+<p>"I do not like literary labels, and I think that
+the names 'realist' and 'romanticist' have been
+so much misused that they are now almost meaningless.
+The significance of the term changes
+from year to year; the realists of one generation
+are the romanticists of the next.</p>
+
+<p>"Bulwer Lytton was considered a realist in his
+day. But we think of him only as a sentimental
+and melodramatic romanticist whose work has
+no connection with real life.</p>
+
+<p>"Charles Dickens was considered a realist by
+the critics of his own generation, and it is probable
+that he considered himself a realist. But
+his strongest instinct was toward the melodramatic.
+He wrote chiefly about simple people, it is
+true, and chiefly about his own land and time.
+But the fact that a writer used his contemporaries
+as subjects does not make him a realist. Dickens's
+people were unusual; they were better or worse
+than most people, and they had extraordinary
+adventures; they did not lead the sort of life<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">136</a></span>
+which most people lead. Therefore, Dickens
+cannot accurately be called a realist."</p>
+
+<p>"You called Dostoievski a realist," I said.
+"What writers who use the English language seem
+to you to deserve best the name of realist?"</p>
+
+<p>"I think," said Mr. Herrick, "that the most
+thoroughgoing realist who ever wrote in England
+was Anthony Trollope. <i>Barchester Towers</i> and
+<i>Framley Parsonage</i> are masterpieces of realism;
+they give a faithful and convincing picture of
+the every-day life of a section of English society
+with which their author was thoroughly familiar.
+Trollope reflected life as he saw it&mdash;normal life.
+He was a great realist.</p>
+
+<p>"In the United States there has been only one
+writer who has as great a right to the name realist
+as had Anthony Trollope. That man is William
+Dean Howells. Mr. Howells has always been
+interested in the normal aspect of things. He
+has taken for his subject a sort of life which he
+knows intimately; he has not sought for extraordinary
+adventures for his theme, nor has he depicted
+characters remote from our experience.
+His novels are distinguished by such fidelity to
+life that he has an indisputable claim to be called
+a realist.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">137</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"But, as I said, it is dangerous and unprofitable
+to attempt to label literary artists. Thackeray
+was a realist. Yet <i>Henry Esmond</i> is classed as a
+romantic novel. In that book Thackeray used
+the realistic method; he spent a long time in
+studying the manners and customs of the time
+about which he was writing; and all the details
+of the sort of life which he describes are, I believe,
+historically accurate. And yet <i>Henry Esmond</i> is
+a romance from beginning to end; it is a romantic
+novel written by a realist, and written according
+to what is called the realistic method.</p>
+
+<p>"On the other hand, Sir Walter Scott was a
+romanticist. No one will deny that. Yet in
+many of his early books he dealt with what may
+be called realistic material; he described with
+close fidelity to detail a sort of life and a sort of
+people with which he was well acquainted.</p>
+
+<p>"Whether a writer is a realist or a romanticist
+is, after all, I think, partly a matter of accident
+or culture. I happen to be a realist because I
+was brought up on the great Russian realists
+like Gogol and the great English realists from
+George Elliot down to Thomas Hardy. If I
+had been brought up on romantic writers I
+suppose that I might now be writing an entirely<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">138</a></span>
+different sort of novel from that with which I am
+associated.</p>
+
+<p>"There is a sounder distinction," said Mr. Herrick,
+"than that which people try to draw between
+the realistic novel and the romantic novel. This
+is the distinction between the novel of character
+and the novel of events. Personally, I never
+have been able to see how the development of
+character can be separated from the plot of a
+novel. A book in which the characters exhibit
+exactly the same characteristics, moral and intellectual,
+in the last chapter as in the first,
+seems to me to be utterly worthless.</p>
+
+<p>"I will, however, make one exception&mdash;that is,
+the novel of the Jules Verne type. In this sort
+of book, and in romances of the Monte Cristo
+kind, action is the only thing with which the
+author and the reader are concerned, and any
+attempt to develop character would clog the
+wheels of the story.</p>
+
+<p>"But every other kind of novel depends on
+character. Even in the best work of Dumas,
+in <i>The Three Musketeers</i>, for example, the characters
+of the principal figures develop as the story
+progresses.</p>
+
+<p>"The highest interest of a novel depends upon<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">139</a></span>
+the development of its characters. If the characters
+are static, then the book is feeble. I have
+never been able to see how the plot and the development
+of the characters can be separated.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course, the novel of character is full of
+adventure. The adventures of Henry James's
+characters are of absorbing interest, but they
+are psychological adventures, internal adventures.
+If some kind person wanted to give one of Henry
+James's novels what is commonly called 'a bully
+plot' the novel would fail."</p>
+
+<p>As to the probable effect on literature of the
+war, Mr. Herrick has a theory different from that
+of any other writer with whom I have discussed
+the subject.</p>
+
+<p>"I think," he said, "that after the war we shall
+return to fatuous romanticism and weak sentimentality
+in literature. The tendency will be to
+read novels in order to forget life, instead of reading
+them to realize life. There will be a revival of
+a deeper religious sense, perhaps, but there will
+also be a revival of mere empty formalism in religion.
+It has been so in the past after great
+convulsions. Men need time to recover their
+spiritual pride, their interest in ideas."</p>
+
+<p>But Mr. Herrick's own reaction to the war<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">140</a></span>
+does not seem to justify his pessimistic prophecy.
+Certainly the personal experience which he next
+narrated to me does not indicate that Mr. Herrick
+is growing sentimental and romantic.</p>
+
+<p>"When I was in Rome recently," he said, "I
+was much impressed by D'Annunzio. I was interested
+in him as a problem, as a picturesque
+literary personality, as a decadent raffine type
+regenerated by the war. I have not read any of
+his books for many years.</p>
+
+<p>"I took some of D'Annunzio's books to read on
+my voyage home. I read <i>Il Piacere</i>. I realized
+its charm, I realized the highly æsthetic quality of
+its author, a scholarly and exact æstheticism as
+well as an emotional æstheticism. But, nevertheless,
+I had to force myself to read the book. It
+was simply a description of a young man's amorous
+adventures. And I could not see any reason
+for the existence of this carefully written
+record of passional experiences.</p>
+
+<p>"It seemed to me that the war had swept this
+sort of thing aside, or had swept aside my interest
+in this sort of thing. The book seemed to me as
+dull and trivial and as remote as a second-rate
+eighteenth-century novel. And I wondered if we
+would ever again return to the time when such a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">141</a></span>
+record of a young man's emotional and sensual
+experiences would be worth while.</p>
+
+<p>"I came to the conclusion that D'Annunzio
+himself would not now write such a novel. I
+think that it would seem to him to be too trivial
+a report on life. I think that the war has so
+forced the essential things of life upon the attention
+of young men."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">144</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">145</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>SIXTEEN DON'TS FOR POETS</i></h2>
+
+<h4>ARTHUR GUITERMAN</h4>
+
+
+<p>Arthur Guiterman has been called the
+Owen Seaman of America. Of course he
+isn't, any more than Owen Seaman is the Arthur
+Guiterman of England. But the verse which
+brings Arthur Guiterman his daily bread is turned
+no less deftly than is that of <i>Punch's</i> famous
+editor. Arthur Guiterman is not a humorist who
+writes verse; he is a poet with an abundant gift
+of humor.</p>
+
+<p>Now, the author of <i>The Antiseptic Baby and
+the Prophylactic Pup</i> and <i>The Quest of the Riband</i>,
+and of those unforgetable rhymed reviews, differs
+from most other poets not only in possessing an
+abnormally developed sense of humor, but also in
+being able to make a comfortable living out of the
+sale of his verse. But when he talked to me
+recently he was by no means inclined to advise<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">146</a></span>
+all able young poets to expect their poetry to
+provide them with board and lodging.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course it is possible to make a living out
+of verse," he said. "Walt Mason does, and so
+does Berton Braley. And now most of my income
+comes from my verse. Formerly I wrote
+short stories, but I haven't written one for seven
+or eight years.</p>
+
+<p>"Nevertheless, I think it is inadvisable for any
+one to set out with the idea of depending on the
+sale of verse as a means of livelihood. You see,
+there are, after all, two forms, and only two forms,
+of literary expression&mdash;the prose form and the
+verse form. Some subjects suit the prose form,
+others suit the verse form. Any one who makes
+writing his profession has ideas severally adapted
+to both of these forms. And every writer should
+be able to express his idea in whichever of these
+two forms suits it better.</p>
+
+<p>"Now, the verse form is older than the prose
+form. And so I have come to look upon it as
+the form peculiarly attractive to youth. Many
+writers outgrew the tendency to use the verse
+form, but some never outgrew it. Sir Walter
+Scott was a verse-writer before he was a prose-writer,
+and so was Shakespeare. So were many<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">147</a></span>
+modern writers&mdash;Robert W. Chambers, for example.</p>
+
+<p>"This theory is true especially in regard to lyric
+verse. The lyric is nearly always the work of
+a young man. As a man grows older he sings less
+and preaches more. Certainly this was true of
+Milton.</p>
+
+<p>"I never thought that I should write verse for
+a living. But verse happens to be the medium
+that I love. I ran across my first poem the other
+day&mdash;it was about fireflies, and I was eight years
+old when I wrote it. Certainly nearly all writers
+write verse before they write prose; perhaps it is
+atavistic. I don't know that Henry James began
+with verse. But I would be willing to bet that
+he did.</p>
+
+<p>"One trouble with a great many people who
+make a living out of writing verse is that they
+feel obliged always to be verse-writers, never to
+write prose, even when the subject demands that
+medium. Alfred Noyes gives us an example of
+this unfortunate tendency in his <i>Drake</i>. I am
+not disparaging Alfred Noyes's work; he has
+written charming lyrics, but in <i>Drake</i>, and perhaps
+in some of the <i>Tales from the Mermaid
+Tavern</i>, I feel that he has written verse not because<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">148</a></span>
+the subject was especially suited to that
+medium, but because he felt that he was a verse-writer
+and therefore should not write prose."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Guiterman is firmly convinced, however,
+that a verse-writer ought to be able, in time, to
+make a living out of his work.</p>
+
+<p>"If a man calls himself a writer," he said, "he
+ought to be able to make a living out of writing.
+And I think that the writer of verse has a greater
+opportunity to-day than ever before. I don't
+mean to say that the appreciation of poetry is
+more intense than ever before, but it is more
+general. More people are reading poetry now
+than in bygone generations.</p>
+
+<p>"Compare with the traditions that we have
+to-day those of the early nineteenth century, of
+the time of Byron and Sir Walter Scott. Then
+books of verse sold in large quantities, it is true,
+but to a relatively small public, to one class of
+readers. Now not only the poet, but also the verse-writer
+has an enormous public. If a really great
+poet should arise to-day he would find awaiting
+him a larger public than that known by any poet
+of the past. But it would be necessary for the
+poet to be great for him to find this public. Byron
+would be more generally appreciated to-day, if<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">149</a></span>
+he were to live again, than he was in his own
+generation. I mention Byron because I think it
+probable that the next great poet will have something
+of Byron's dynamic quality."</p>
+
+<p>"Who was the last great poet?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"How is one to decide whether or not a poet is
+great?" asked Mr. Guiterman in turn. "My own
+feeling is that the late William Vaughn Moody
+was a great poet in the making. Perhaps he never
+really fulfilled his early promise; perhaps he went
+back to the themes of bygone ages too much in
+finding themes for his poetry. It may be that the
+next really great poet will sing an entirely different
+strain; it may be that I will be one of those
+who will say that his work is all bosh.</p>
+
+<p>"But at any rate, he won't be an imitation
+Whitman or anything of that sort. He won't be
+any special school, nor will he think that he is
+founding a school. But it may be that his admirers
+will found a school with him as its leader,
+and they may force him to take himself seriously,
+and thus ruin himself."</p>
+
+<p>Returning to the subject of the advisability of
+a writer being able to express himself in verse as
+well as in prose, Mr. Guiterman said:</p>
+
+<p>"Especially in our generation is it true that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">150</a></span>
+good verse requires extreme condensation. In
+most work to-day brevity is desirable. The epigram
+beats the epic. If Milton were living to-day
+he would not write epics. I don't think it
+improbable that we have men with Miltonic
+minds, and they are not writing epics.</p>
+
+<p>"If a man finds that he cannot express his idea
+in verse more forcefully than he can in prose, then
+he ought to write prose. Very often a writer is
+interested in some little incident which he would
+not be justified in treating in prose, something too
+slight to be the theme of a short story. This is
+the sort of thing which he should put into verse.
+There is Leigh Hunt's <i>Jennie Kissed Me</i>, for example.
+Suppose he had made a short story
+of it."</p>
+
+<p>Thinking of this poet's financial success, I
+asked him just what course he would advise a
+young poet to pursue who had no means of livelihood
+except writing.</p>
+
+<p>"Well, the worst thing for him to do," said
+Mr. Guiterman, "would be to devote all his attention
+to writing an epic. He'd starve to death.</p>
+
+<p>"I suppose the best thing for him to do would
+be to write on as many subjects as possible, including
+those of intense interest to himself. What<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">151</a></span>
+interests him intensely is sure to interest others,
+and the number of others whom it interests will
+depend on how close he is by nature to the mind
+of his place and time. He should get some sort
+of regular work so that he need not depend at
+first upon the sale of his writings. This work
+need not necessarily be literary in character, although
+it would be advisable for him to get employment
+in a magazine or newspaper office, so
+that he may get in touch with the conditions
+governing the sale of manuscripts.</p>
+
+<p>"He should write on themes suggested by the
+day's news. He should write topical verse; if
+there is a political campaign on, he should write
+verse bearing upon that; if a great catastrophe
+occurs, he should write about that, but he must
+not write on these subjects in a commonplace
+manner.</p>
+
+<p>"He should send his verses to the daily papers,
+for they are the publications most interested in
+topical verse. But also he should attempt to
+sell his work to the magazines, which pay better
+prices than the newspapers. If it is in him to do
+so, he should write humorous verse, for there is
+always a good market for humorous verse that is
+worth printing. He should look up the publishers<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">152</a></span>
+of holiday cards, and submit to them Christmas,
+Thanksgiving, and Easter verses, for which he
+would receive, probably, about five dollars apiece.
+He should write advertising verses, and he should,
+perhaps, make an alliance with some artist with
+whom he can work, each supplementing the work
+of the other."</p>
+
+<p>"Mr. Guiterman," I said, "is this the advice
+that you would give to John Keats if he were to
+ask you?"</p>
+
+<p>"Yes, certainly," said Mr. Guiterman. "But
+you understand that our hypothetical poet must
+all the time be doing his own work, writing the
+sort of verse which he specially desires to write.
+If his pot-boiling is honestly done, it will help
+him with his other work.</p>
+
+<p>"He must study the needs and limitations of the
+various publications. He must recognize the fact
+that just because he has certain powers it does not
+follow that everything he writes will be desired
+by the editors. Marked ability and market
+ability are different propositions.</p>
+
+<p>"If he finds that the magazines are not printing
+sad sonnets, he must not write sad sonnets. He
+must adapt himself to the demands of the day.</p>
+
+<p>"There is high precedent for this course. You<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">153</a></span>
+asked if I would give this advice to the young
+Keats. Why not, when Shakespeare himself followed
+the line of action of which I spoke? He
+began as a lyric poet, a writer of sonnets. He
+wrote plays because he saw that the demand was
+for plays, and because he wanted to make a
+living and more than a living. But because he
+was Shakespeare his plays are what they are.</p>
+
+<p>"The poet must be influenced by the demand.
+There is inspiration in the demand. Besides the
+material reward, the poet who is influenced by
+the demand has the encouraging, inspiring knowledge
+that he is writing something that people
+want to read."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. Guiterman to give me a list of
+negative commandments for the guidance of aspiring
+poets. Here it is:</p>
+
+<p>"Don't think of yourself as a poet, and don't
+dress the part.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't classify yourself as a member of any
+special school or group.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't call your quarters a garret or a studio.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't frequent exclusively the company of
+writers.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't think of any class of work that you feel
+moved to do as either beneath you or above you.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">154</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Don't complain of lack of appreciation. (In
+the long run no really good published work can
+escape appreciation.)</p>
+
+<p>"Don't think you are entitled to any special
+rights, privileges, and immunities as a literary
+person, or have any more reason to consider your
+possible lack of fame a grievance against the world
+than has any shipping-clerk or traveling-salesman.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't speak of poetic license or believe that
+there is any such thing.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't tolerate in your own work any flaws
+in rhythm, rhyme, melody, or grammar.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't use 'e'er' for 'ever,' 'o'er' for 'over,'
+'whenas' or 'what time' for 'when,' or any of the
+'poetical' commonplaces of the past.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't say 'did go' for 'went,' even if you need
+an extra syllable.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't omit articles or prepositions for the
+sake of the rhythm.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't have your book published at your own
+expense by any house that makes a practice of
+publishing at the author's expense.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't write poems about unborn babies.</p>
+
+<p>"Don't&mdash;don't write hymns to the great god
+Pan. He is dead; let him rest in peace!</p>
+
+<p>"Don't write what everybody else is writing."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">156</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">157</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>MAGAZINES CHEAPEN FICTION</i></h2>
+
+<h4>GEORGE BARR McCUTCHEON</h4>
+
+<p>Why is the modern American novel inferior
+to the modern English novel? Of course,
+there are some patriotic critics who believe that
+it is not inferior. But most readers of fiction
+speak of H. G. Wells and Compton Mackenzie,
+for example, with a respect and admiration which
+they do not extend to living American novelists.</p>
+
+<p>Why is this? Is it because of snobbishness or
+literary colonialism on the part of the American
+public? George Barr McCutcheon does not think
+so. The author of <i>Beverly of Graustark</i> and many
+another popular romance believes that there
+is in America a force definitely harmful to the
+novel. And that force is the magazine.</p>
+
+<p>"The development of the magazine," he said
+to me, "has affected fiction in two ways. It has
+made it cheap and yet expensive, if you know
+what I mean.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">158</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Novels written solely with the view to sensationalism
+are more than likely to bring discredit,
+not upon the magazine, but upon the writer. He
+gets his price, however, and the public gets its
+fiction.</p>
+
+<p>"In my humble opinion, a writer should develop
+and complete his novel without a thought
+of its value or suitability to serial purposes. He
+should complete it to his own satisfaction&mdash;if that
+is possible&mdash;before submitting it to either editor
+or publisher. They should not be permitted to
+see it until it is in its complete form."</p>
+
+<p>"But you yourself write serial stories, do you
+not?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"I have never written a serial," answered Mr.
+McCutcheon. "Some of my stories have been
+published serially, but they were not written as
+serials.</p>
+
+<p>"I am quite convinced in my own mind that
+if we undertake to analyze the distinction between
+the first-class English writers of to-day and many
+of our Americans, we will find that their superiority
+resolves itself quite simply into the fact that they
+do not write their novels as serials. In other
+words, they write a novel and not a series of
+chapters, parts, and instalments."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">159</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Do you think that the American novel will
+always be inferior to the English novel?" I asked.
+"Is it not probable that the American novel will
+so develop as to escape the effects of serialization?"</p>
+
+<p>"There is no reason," Mr. McCutcheon replied,
+"why Americans should not produce novels equal
+to those of the English, provided the same care is
+exercised in the handling of their material, and
+that they make haste as slowly as possible. Just
+so long, however, as we are menaced by the perils
+of the serial our general output will remain inferior
+to that of England.</p>
+
+<p>"I do not mean to say that we have no writers
+in this country who are the equals in every respect
+of the best of the English novelists. We have
+some great men and women here, sincere, earnest
+workers who will not be spoiled."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. McCutcheon has no respect for the type
+of novel, increasingly popular of late, in which the
+author devotes page after page to glowing accounts
+of immorality with the avowed intention
+of teaching a high moral lesson. He has little
+faith in the honesty of purpose of the authors of
+works of this sort.</p>
+
+<p>"The so-called sex novel," he said, "is one of
+our gravest fatalities. I may be wrong, but I<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">160</a></span>
+am inclined to think that most novels of that
+character are written, not from an æsthetic point
+of view, but for the somewhat laudable purpose
+of keeping the wolf from the door and at the
+same time allowing the head of the family to ride
+in an automobile of his own.</p>
+
+<p>"The typical serial writer is animated by the
+desire, or perhaps it is an obligation, to make the
+'suspended interest' paramount to all else. This
+interest must not be allowed to flag between
+instalments.</p>
+
+<p>"The keen desire for thrills must be gratified
+at all costs. It is commanded by the editor&mdash;and
+I do not say that the editor errs. His public
+expects it in a serial. It must not be disappointed."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. McCutcheon if he believed that a
+writer could produce sensational and poorly constructed
+fiction in order to make a living and yet
+keep his talent unimpaired; if a writer was justified
+in writing trash in order to gain leisure for
+serious work. He replied:</p>
+
+<p>"There are writers to-day who persist in turning
+out what they vaingloriously describe as 'stuff
+to meet the popular demand.' They invariably
+or inevitably declare that some day they will 'be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">161</a></span>
+in a position to write the sort of stuff they want
+to write.'</p>
+
+<p>"These writers say, in defense of their position,
+that they are not even trying to do their best
+work, that they are merely biding their time, and
+that&mdash;some day! I very much doubt their sincerity,
+or, at any rate, their capacity for self-analysis.
+I believe that when an author sets himself
+down to write a book (I refer to any author
+of recognized ability), he puts into that book the
+best that is in him at the time.</p>
+
+<p>"It is impossible for a good, conscientious writer
+to work on a plane lower than his best. Only
+hack writers can do such things.</p>
+
+<p>"There is not one of us who does not do his
+best when he undertakes to write his book. We
+only confess that we have not done our best when
+a critic accuses us of pot-boiling, and so forth.
+Then we rise in our pride and say, 'Oh, well, I
+can do better work than this, and they know it.'</p>
+
+<p>"It is true that we may not be doing the thing
+that we really want to do, but I am convinced
+that we are unconsciously doing our best, just the
+same. It all resolves itself into this statement&mdash;a
+good workman cannot deliberately do a poor
+piece of work.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">162</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"I am free to confess that I have done my very
+best in everything I have undertaken. It may fall
+short of excellence as viewed from even my own
+viewpoint, but it is the best I know how to do.</p>
+
+<p>"So you may take it from me that the writer
+who declares that he is going to do something
+really worth while, just as soon as he gets through
+doing the thing that the public expects him to
+do, is deceiving himself and no one else. An
+author cannot stand still in his work. He either
+progresses or retrogrades, and no man progresses
+except by means of steady improvement. He
+cannot say, 'I will write a poor book this year
+and a great book next year.'"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. McCutcheon is so unashamedly a romanticist
+that I expected to find him an enthusiastic
+partisan of the first and greatest master of the
+romantic novel in English. But, to my surprise,
+he said:</p>
+
+<p>"I suppose the world has outgrown Sir Walter
+Scott's novels. It is quite natural that it should.
+The world is older and conditions have changed.
+The fairest simile I can offer in explanation is
+that as man himself grows older he loses, except
+in a too frequently elastic memory, his interest in
+the things that moved him when he was a boy."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">163</a></span></p>
+
+<p>But while Mr. McCutcheon believes (in defiance
+of the opinion of the publishers who continue
+to bring out, year by year, their countless
+new editions of the Waverley Novels in all the
+languages of the civilized world) that the spell of
+the Wizard of the North has waned, he nevertheless
+believes that the romantic novel has lost
+none of its ancient appeal.</p>
+
+<p>"I do not believe," he said, "that the vogue
+of the romantic novel, or tale (which is a better
+word for describing the sort of fiction covered by
+this generic term), will ever die. The present
+war undoubtedly will alter the trend of the modern
+romantic fiction, but it will not in effect
+destroy it."</p>
+
+<p>"How will it alter it?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Years most certainly will go by," he replied,
+"before the novelist may even hope to contend
+with the realities of this great and most unromantic
+conflict. Kings and courtiers are very ordinary,
+and, in some cases, ignoble creatures in these
+days, and none of them appears to be romantic.</p>
+
+<p>"We find a good many villains among our erstwhile
+heroes, and a good many heroes among our
+principal villains. People will not care to read
+war novels for a good many years to come, but<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">164</a></span>
+it is inevitable that future generations will read
+even the lightest kind of fiction dealing with this
+war, horrible though it is. Just so long as the
+world exists there will be people who read nothing
+else but the red-blood, stirring romantic stories.</p>
+
+<p>"There exists, of course, a class of readers who
+will not be tempted by the romantic, who will not
+even tolerate it, because they cannot understand it.
+That class may increase, but so will its antithesis.</p>
+
+<p>"I know a man who has read the Bible through
+five or six times, not because he is of a religious
+turn of mind or even mildly devout, but because
+there is a lot of good, sound, exciting romance in
+it! A man who is without romance in his soul
+has no right to beget children, for he cannot love
+them as they ought to be loved. They represent
+romance at its best. He is, therefore, purely selfish
+in his possession of them."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. McCutcheon had spoken of the probable
+effect of the war on the popular taste for romantic
+fiction. I reminded him of William Dean
+Howells's much-quoted statement, "War stops
+literature."</p>
+
+<p>"War stops everything else," said Mr. McCutcheon,
+"so why not literature? It stops everything,
+I amend, except bloodshed, horror, and heartache.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">165</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"And when the war itself is stopped, you will
+find that literature will be revived with farming
+and other innocent and productive industries.
+I venture to say that some of the greatest literature
+the world has ever known is being written
+to-day. Out of the history of this titanic struggle
+will come the most profound literary expressions
+of all time, and from men who to-day are unknown
+and unconsidered."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. McCutcheon if he did not believe
+that the youthful energy of the United States
+was likely to make its citizens impatient of romance,
+that quality being generally considered
+the exclusive property of nations ancient in civilization.
+He did not think so.</p>
+
+<p>"America," he said, "is essentially a romantic
+country, our great and profound commercialism
+to the contrary notwithstanding. America was
+born of adventure; its infancy was cradled in
+romance; it has grown up in thrills. And while
+to-day it may not reflect romance as we are prone
+to consider it, there still rests in America a wonderful
+treasure in the shape of undeveloped
+possibilities.</p>
+
+<p>"We are, first of all, an eager, zestful, imaginative
+people. We are creatures of romance. We<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">166</a></span>
+do two things exceedingly well&mdash;we dream and
+we perform.</p>
+
+<p>"Our dreams are of adventure, of risk, of
+chance, of impossibilities, and of deeds that only
+the bold may conceive. And we find on waking
+from these dreams that we have performed the
+deeds we dreamed of.</p>
+
+<p>"The Old World looks upon us as braggarts.
+Perhaps we are, but we are kindly, genial, smiling
+braggarts&mdash;and the braggart is, after all, our
+truest romanticist.</p>
+
+<p>"I like to hear a grown man admit that he
+still believes in fairies. That sort of man thinks
+of the things that are beautiful, even though
+they are invisible. And&mdash;if you stop to think
+about it&mdash;the most beautiful things in the world
+are invisible."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">168</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">169</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>BUSINESS INCOMPATIBLE WITH ART</i></h2>
+
+<h4>FRANK H. SPEARMAN</h4>
+
+<p>The late J. Pierpont Morgan writing sonnet
+sequences, Rockefeller regarding oil as useful
+only when mixed with pigment and spread upon
+canvas by his own deft hand, Carnegie designing
+libraries instead of paying for them&mdash;these are
+some of the entertaining visions that occur to the
+mind of Frank H. Spearman when he contemplates
+in fancy a civilization in which business
+no longer draws the master minds away from art.</p>
+
+<p>I asked the author of <i>Nan of Music Mountain</i>
+if he thought that the trend of present-day
+American life&mdash;its commercialism and materialism&mdash;affected
+the character of our literature. He
+replied:</p>
+
+<p>"Let us take commercialism first: By it you
+mean the pursuit of business. Success in business
+brings money, power, and that public esteem
+we may loosely term fame&mdash;the admiration of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">170</a></span>
+our fellow-men and the sense of power among
+them.</p>
+
+<p>"Commercialism, thus defined, affects the character
+of our literature in a way that none of our
+students of the subject seems to have apprehended.
+We live in an atmosphere of material striving.
+Our great rewards are material successes. The
+extremely important consequence is that our
+business life through its greater temptations&mdash;through
+its being able to offer the rewards of
+wealth and mastery and esteem&mdash;robs literature
+and the kindred arts of our keenest minds. We
+have, it is true, eminent doctors and lawyers, but
+the complaint that commercialism has invaded
+these professions only proves that they depend
+directly on business prosperity for a substantial
+portion of their own rewards.</p>
+
+<p>"I am not forgetting the crust and garret as
+the traditional setting for the literary genius;
+but, when this state of affairs existed, the genius
+had no chance to become a business millionaire
+within ten years&mdash;or, for that matter, within a
+hundred. And while poverty provides an excellent
+foundation for a career, it is not so good as a
+superstructure&mdash;at least, not outside the ranks of the
+heroic few who renounce riches for spiritual things.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">171</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"More than once," continued Mr. Spearman,
+"in meeting men among our masters of industry,
+I have been struck by the thought that these are
+the men who should be writing great books,
+painting great pictures, and building great cathedrals;
+their tastes, I have sometimes found, run
+in these directions quite as strongly as the tastes
+of lesser men who give themselves to literature,
+painting, or architecture. But the present-day
+market for cathedrals is somewhat straitened, and
+a great ambition may nowadays easily neglect
+the prospective rewards of literature for those of
+steel-making.</p>
+
+<p>"Business success&mdash;not achieved in literature
+and the arts&mdash;comes first with us; in consequence,
+the ranks of those who follow these professions
+are robbed of the intellect that should contribute
+to them. This is the real way in which commercialism&mdash;our
+pursuit of business&mdash;affects our
+literature. It depletes, too, in the same way,
+the quality of men in our public life.</p>
+
+<p>"Charles G. Dawes has called my attention
+more than once to the falling off in caliber among
+men from whose ranks our politicians and public
+men are drawn. It is not that our present administration
+is so conspicuously weak; go to any<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">172</a></span>
+of the Presidential conventions this year and note
+the falling off in quality among the politicians.
+In one generation the change has been startling.
+The sons of the men that loomed large in public
+life twenty-five years ago to-day are masters of
+business.</p>
+
+<p>"Business takes everything. We have had
+really magnificent financiers, such as the elder
+Morgan, who should be our Michael Angelo. I
+have known railroad executives who might have
+been distinguished novelists, and bankers who
+would have been great artists were the American
+people as obsessed with the painting of pictures
+and the making of statues as those of Europe
+once were.</p>
+
+<p>"In Michael Angelo's day public interest in
+solving problems in manufacture and transportation
+did not overshadow that in painting and
+sculpture. Leonardo in our day would be building
+railroads, digging canals, or inventing the aeroplane&mdash;and
+doing better, perhaps, at these things
+than any man living; he came perilously close to
+doing all of them in his own day.</p>
+
+<p>"Before you can bring our steel-founders and
+business men into literature you must make success
+in literature and its kindred arts esteemed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">173</a></span>
+as the greatest reward. As it is, I fear it is likely
+to be chiefly those who through lack of capacity,
+inclination, or robust health are unequal to the
+heat and burden of great business that will be
+left for the secondary callings, among which
+we must at present rank literature. It would
+be interesting, too, to consider to what extent
+this movement of men toward business rewards
+has been compensated for by the opportunities
+afforded to women in the field thus deserted; we
+certainly have many clever women cultivating it."</p>
+
+<p>"But what," I asked, "about materialism&mdash;not
+specifically commercialism, but materialism? Do
+you think that its evil effects are evident in contemporary
+literature?"</p>
+
+<p>"Materialism&mdash;you mean the philosophy&mdash;has
+quite a different effect on any literature&mdash;a poisonous,
+a baneful effect, rather than a merely harmful
+one," Mr. Spearman answered. "Can you
+possibly have, at any time or anywhere, great
+art without a great faith? Since the era of
+Christianity, at any rate, it seems to me that
+periods of faith, or at least periods enjoying the
+reflexes and echoes of faith, have afforded the
+really nourishing atmosphere for artistic development.
+Spirituality provides that which the imagination<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">174</a></span>
+may seize upon for the substance of its
+creative effort; without spirituality the imagination
+shrivels, and the materialist, while losing
+none of his characteristic confidence, shrinks continually
+to punier artistic stature."</p>
+
+<p>Something in what Mr. Spearman had said
+reminded me of Henry Holt's criticisms of the
+modern magazines. So I asked Mr. Spearman
+what effect the development of the American
+magazine, with its high prices for serials and series
+of stories, had had upon our fiction. He answered:</p>
+
+<p>"Good, I think. Our fiction must compete in
+its rewards with those of business. One of the
+rewards of either&mdash;even if you put it, in the first
+case, the lowest&mdash;is the monetary reward, and the
+more substantial that can be made, the more
+chance fiction will have of holding up its head.</p>
+
+<p>"I have had occasion to watch pretty closely
+the development of the inclinations and ambitions
+of a number of average American boys&mdash;boys
+that have had fairly intimate opportunities to
+consider both literature and business. I have
+been startled more than once to find that as each
+of them came along and was asked what he wanted
+to do, the substance of his answer has been,
+'Something to make money.'<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">175</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"If you question your own youthful acquaintances,
+you will receive in most cases, I dare say,
+similar answers. I am afraid if Giotto had been
+a Wyoming shepherd-boy he would want to be
+a steel-maker. Anything that tends to attract
+the young to the pursuit of literature as a calling
+strengthens our fiction, and the magazine should
+have credit for an 'assist' in this direction. Don't
+forget, of course, that the magazine itself derives
+directly, by way of advertising, from business."</p>
+
+<p>"Do you think, then," I asked, "that our
+writers are producing work as likely to endure as
+that which is being produced in England?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Spearman smiled whimsically. "Your
+question suggests to me," he replied, "rather than
+any judgment in the case, the reflection that the
+average English writer has possessed over our
+average American writer the very great advantage
+of an opportunity to become really educated;
+to this extent their equipment is appreciably
+stronger than ours. If you will read the ordinary
+run of English fiction or play-writing and compare
+it with similar work of ours, you cannot fail
+to note the better finish in their work. And in
+expressing a conviction that our writers are somewhat
+handicapped as to this factor in their equipment,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">176</a></span>
+I do not indict them for wasted opportunities;
+I indict our own substantial failure in educational
+methods. For a generation or more we
+have experimented, and from the very first grade
+in our grammar-schools up to the university
+courses there have resulted confusion and ineptitude.
+I instance specifically our experimentation
+with electives and our widespread contempt
+for the classics. To attempt to master any of
+the arts and not to be intimately familiar with
+what the Greeks and the Romans have left us
+of their achievement&mdash;not to speak of those, to
+us, uncharted seas of medieval achievement in
+every direction following the twelfth century&mdash;is
+to make the effort under a distinct disadvantage.</p>
+
+<p>"The average English writer has had much
+more of this intimacy, or at least a chance at
+much more of it, than the average American writer.
+In the sphere of literary criticism I have heard
+Mr. Brownell speak of the better quality of even
+the anonymous English literary criticism so frequently
+to be found in their journals when compared
+with similar American work. There is
+only one explanation for these things, and it lies
+in the training. All of this not implying, in indirect
+answer to your question, that the English<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">177</a></span>
+writer is to bear away the prize in the competition
+for literary permanence. American Samsons may,
+despite everything, burst their bonds; but if they
+win it will often be without what their teachers
+should have supplied.</p>
+
+<p>"Mr. Brownell, in his definitive essay on
+Cooper, in comparing the material at Balzac's
+hand with that at Cooper's, remarks on the fact
+that Cooper's background was essentially nature.
+'Nothing, it is true, is more romantic than nature,'
+adds Mr. Brownell, 'except nature plus man.
+But the exception is prodigious.' Europe measures
+behind her writers almost three thousand
+years of man.</p>
+
+<p>"We have in this country no atmosphere of
+Christian tradition such as that which pervades
+Europe&mdash;English-speaking people parted with historic
+Christianity before they came here. But,
+willingly or unwillingly, the English and the Continental
+writers are saturated with this magnificent
+background of Christianity&mdash;they can't
+escape it. And what I note as striking evidence
+of the value to them of this brooding spirit of
+twenty European centuries is the fact that their
+very pagans choose Christian material to work
+with. Goethe himself, fine old pagan that he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">178</a></span>
+was, turned to Christian quarries for his <i>Faust</i>.
+The minor pagans turn in likewise, though naturally
+with slighter results. But to all of them,
+Christianity, paraphrasing Samson, might well say:
+'If ye had not plowed with my heifer, ye had not
+read&mdash;your own riddle of longed-for recognition.'"</p>
+
+<p>"Why is it that the art of fiction is no longer
+taken as seriously as it was, for example, in the
+time of Sir Walter Scott?"</p>
+
+<p>"I don't know how seriously," countered Mr.
+Spearman, "you mean your question to be taken.
+It suggests that in the day of Walter Scott the
+field of novel-writing was still so new that only
+bolder spirits ventured into it. It was not a day
+when the many could attempt the novel with any
+assurances of success in marketing their wares.
+In consequence we got then the work of only big
+men and women. Pioneers&mdash;though not necessarily
+respectable&mdash;are a hardy lot.</p>
+
+<p>"Still&mdash;touching on your other question about
+the great American novel&mdash;if I wished to develop
+great musicians I should start every one possible
+at studying music, and I can't help thinking that
+the more there are among us who attempt novels
+the greater probability there will be for the production
+of a masterpiece. A man's mind is a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">179</a></span>
+mine. Neither he nor any one else knows what
+is in it. Possessing the property in fee simple,
+he has, of course, certain valuable proprietary
+rights. But the only way I know of to find out
+to a certainty just what lies within the property
+is persistently to tunnel and drift, or, as Mr.
+Brownell says, 'to get out what is in you.' And
+I am in complete accord with him in the belief
+that temperament is the best possible endowment
+for a novelist&mdash;and temperament comes, if you are
+a Christian, from God; if a pagan, from the gods."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Spearman returned to his theme of the
+effect of materialism on literature in the course of
+a discussion of the French novel of the day as
+compared to the novel of Zola and his imitators.
+He said:</p>
+
+<p>"I think the important thing for Zola was that
+his day coincided with a materialistic ascendency
+in the thought of France. He lived at a time admirably
+suited to a man of his type. Zola found
+a France weak and contemptible in its government,
+and in consequence a soil in which grossness
+could profitably be cultivated.</p>
+
+<p>"He was by no means a great artist; he was
+merely a writer writhing for recognition when he
+turned to filth. He took it up to commercialize<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">180</a></span>
+it, to turn it into money and reputation. Men
+such as he are continually, at different times and
+in different countries, lifting their heads. But
+unless they are sustained by what chances to be
+a loose public attitude on questions of decency,
+they are clubbed into silence.</p>
+
+<p>"And just why should the exploitation of filth
+assume to monopolize the word 'realism'? To
+define precisely what realism should include and
+exclude would call for hard thinking. But it
+doesn't take much thought to reach the conclusion
+that mere annalists of grossness have no
+proper monopoly of the term. Grossness is no
+adequate foundation for a literary monument;
+it is not even a satisfactory corner-stone. The few
+writers one thinks of that constitute exceptions
+would have left a better monument without it.</p>
+
+<p>"But if you wish to realize how fortunate Zola
+was in coinciding with a period when the chief
+effort of the ruling spirits of France was to war
+on all forces that strove to conserve decency, try
+to imagine what sort of a reception <i>L'Assommoir</i>
+would be accorded to-day by the tears of
+France stricken through calamity to its knees.</p>
+
+<p>"France is experiencing now realism of quite
+another sort from that propagated by Zola&mdash;a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">181</a></span>
+realism that is wringing the souls and turning
+the thoughts of a great and unhappy people back
+once more to the eternal verities; in these grossness
+never had a place.</p>
+
+<p>"And if you don't want to think in grossness,
+don't read in it; if you don't want to act in grossness,
+don't think in it. To exploit it is to exaggerate
+its proper significance in the affairs of life.</p>
+
+<p>"Twenty-five years ago an American writer
+set out as a Zola disciple to give us something
+American along Zola's lines. He made a failure
+of it&mdash;so complete that he was forced to complain
+that later efforts in which he returned to
+paths of decency were refused by editors and
+publishers. He had spoiled his name as an
+asset. If you are curious to note how far the
+bars have been let down in his direction in twenty-five
+years, contemplate what passes to-day among
+us with quite a footing of magazine and book
+popularity. It means simply that we are falling
+into those conditions of public indifference in
+which moral parasites may flourish. But if one
+were forced to-day to choose in France between
+the material taken up by Zola after his failure to
+cultivate successfully cleaner fields, and that
+chosen by Réné Bazin and the new and hopeful<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">182</a></span>
+French school of spirituality, there could be no
+question that the latter would afford the better
+opportunity. And there can be no real question
+but that the exponents of grossness are likewise
+opportunists, looking first of all for a market
+for their names&mdash;as most men are doing. But
+some men, by reason of inclination or voluntary
+restraint, have restricted themselves in their
+choice of literary materials."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Spearman has recently given much of his
+time to moving-picture work, with the result that
+his name is nearly as familiar to the devotees of the
+flickering screen as to habitual magazine readers.
+I asked him how the development of the moving
+picture is likely to affect literature. He replied:</p>
+
+<p>"What I can say on this point will perhaps be
+more directly of interest to writers themselves;
+the development of the moving picture broadens
+their market. It has, if you will let me put it in
+this way, increased the number of our theaters in
+their capacity for absorbing material for the drama
+a thousandfold. Inevitably a new industry developing
+with such amazing rapidity is still in the
+experimental stages, and those who know it best
+say its possibilities are but just beginning. What
+I note of interest to the literary worker is that men<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">183</a></span>
+advanced and in authority in the production of
+pictures have reached this conclusion: Behind
+every good picture there must be a good story.
+The slogan to-day is 'The story is the thing.'
+And those close to the 'inside' of the industry
+say to-day to the fictionist: 'Hold on to your
+stories. Within a year or two they will command
+from the movies much higher prices than to-day,
+because the supply is fast becoming exhausted.'"</p>
+
+<p>It was in the course of his remarks about the
+rewards of literature that Mr. Spearman told an
+interesting story concerning Henry James and
+George du Maurier. He said:</p>
+
+<p>"The recent death of Henry James is bringing
+out many anecdotes concerning him. At the
+time of George du Maurier's death it was recalled
+that he had once given the material for <i>Trilby</i> to
+Henry James with permission to use it; and the
+story ran that, resolving to use it himself, Mr.
+James returned the material to Du Maurier, who
+wrote the novel from it.</p>
+
+<p>"But I don't think it has ever appeared that
+the real reason why Henry James did not attempt
+<i>Trilby</i> was that he possessed no musical
+sense; Mr. James himself told me this, and without
+a sense of music the material was useless to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">184</a></span>
+any one. I discussed the incident with him some
+ten years ago and he added, in connection with
+<i>Trilby</i> and Du Maurier, other interesting facts.</p>
+
+<p>"<i>Trilby</i> did not at first make a signal success
+in England. Its first big hit was made in <i>Harper's
+Magazine</i>. Not realizing the American possibilities,
+Mr. du Maurier, when offered by Harper
+&amp; Brothers a choice between royalties and five
+thousand dollars outright for the book rights, took
+the lump sum as if it were descended straight from
+heaven. When the news of the extraordinary
+success of the book in this country reached him,
+he realized his serious mistake, and in the family
+circle there was keen depression over it. But
+further surprises were in store for him. To their
+eternal credit, the house of Harper &amp; Brothers&mdash;honorable
+then as now&mdash;in view of the unfortunate
+situation in which their author had placed
+himself, voluntarily canceled the first contract
+and restored Du Maurier to a royalty basis. The
+fear in the English home then was that this arrangement
+would come too late to bring in anything.
+Not only, however, did the book continue
+to sell, but the play came on, and together the
+rights afforded George du Maurier a competency
+that banished further worry from the home."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">186</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">187</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>THE NOVEL MUST GO</i></h2>
+
+<h4>WILL N. HARBEN</h4>
+
+<p>The novel is doomed. If the automobile, the
+aeroplane, and the moving picture continue
+to develop during the next ten years as they have
+developed during the last ten, people will cease
+almost entirely to take interest in fiction.</p>
+
+<p>It was not Henry Ford who told me this.
+Neither was it Mr. Wright, nor M. Pathé. The
+man who made this ominous prophecy about the
+novel is himself a successful novelist. He is Will
+N. Harben, author of <i>Pole Baker</i>, <i>Ann Boyd</i>, <i>The
+Desired Woman</i>, and many other widely read tales
+of life in rural Georgia.</p>
+
+<p>Although he is so closely associated with the
+Southern scenes about which he has written, Mr.
+Harben spends most of his time in New York
+nowadays. He justifies this course interestingly&mdash;but
+before I tell his views on this subject I will<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">188</a></span>
+repeat what he had to say about this possible
+extinction of the novel.</p>
+
+<p>"You have read," he said, "of the tremendous
+vogue of <i>Pickwick Papers</i> when it was first published.
+No work of fiction since that time has
+been received with such enthusiasm.</p>
+
+<p>"In London at that time you would find
+statuettes of Pickwick, Mr. Winkle, and Sam
+Weller in the shop windows. There were Pickwick
+punch-ladles, Pickwick teaspoons, Pickwick
+souvenirs of all sorts.</p>
+
+<p>"Now, when you walk down Broadway, do
+you find any reminders of the popular novels of
+the day? You do not, except of course in the
+bookshops. But you do find things that remind
+you of contemporary taste. In the windows of
+stationers and druggists you find statuettes not
+of characters in the fiction of the day, but of
+Charlie Chaplin.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course the moving picture has not supplanted
+the novel. But people all over the country
+are becoming less and less interested in fiction.
+The time which many people formerly gave to
+the latest novel they now give to the latest film.</p>
+
+<p>"And the moving picture is by no means the
+only thing which is weaning us away from the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">189</a></span>
+novel. The automobile is a powerful influence
+in this direction.</p>
+
+<p>"Take, for instance, the town from which I
+come&mdash;Dalton, Georgia. There the people who
+used to read novels spend their time which they
+used to give to that entertainment riding around
+in automobiles. Sometimes they go on long trips,
+sometimes they go to visit their friends in near-by
+towns. But automobiling is the way in which
+they nowadays are accustomed to spend their
+leisure.</p>
+
+<p>"Naturally, this has its effect on their attitude
+toward novels. Years ago, when Dalton had a
+population of about three thousand, it had two
+well-patronized bookshops. Now it has a population
+of about seven thousand and no bookshops
+at all!</p>
+
+<p>"I suppose one of the reasons is that people
+live their adventures by means of the automobile,
+and therefore do not care so much about getting
+adventures from the printed page. But the chief
+reason is one of time&mdash;the fact is that people more
+and more prefer automobiling to reading.</p>
+
+<p>"Now, if the aeroplane were to be perfected&mdash;as
+we have every reason to believe it will be&mdash;so
+that we could travel in it as we now do in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">190</a></span>
+automobile, what possible interest would we have
+in reading dry novels? It seems likely that in a
+hundred years we will be able to see clearly the
+surface of Mars&mdash;do you think that people will
+want to read novels when this wonderful new
+world is before their eyes?</p>
+
+<p>"The authors themselves are beginning to
+realize this. They are becoming more and more
+nervous. They are not the placid creatures that
+they were in Sir Walter Scott's day. They feel
+that people are not as interested in them and
+their works as they used to be. I doubt very
+much if any publisher to-day would be interested,
+for example, in an author who produced a novel
+as long as <i>David Copperfield</i> and of the same
+excellence."</p>
+
+<p>"But do you think," I asked, "that the fault
+is entirely that of the public? Haven't the authors
+changed, too?"</p>
+
+<p>"I think that the authors have changed," said
+Mr. Harben, reflectively. "The authors do not
+live as they used to live.</p>
+
+<p>"The authors no longer live with the people
+about whom they write. Instead, they live with
+other authors.</p>
+
+<p>"Nowadays, an author achieves success by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">191</a></span>
+writing, we will say, about the people of his home
+in the Far West. Then he comes to New York.
+And instead of living with the sort of people about
+whom he writes, he lives with artists. That must
+have its effect upon his work."</p>
+
+<p>"But is not that what you yourself did?" I
+asked. "A New York apartment-house is certainly
+the last place in the world in which to look
+for the historian of <i>Pole Baker</i>!"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Harben smiled. "But I don't live with
+artists," he said. "I try to live with the kind
+of people I write about. I resolved a long time
+ago to try to avoid living with literary people
+and to live with all sorts of human beings&mdash;with
+people who didn't know or care whether or not
+I was a writer.</p>
+
+<p>"So I have for my friends and acquaintances
+sailors, merchants&mdash;people of all sorts of professions
+and trade. And people of that sort&mdash;people
+who make no pretensions to be artists&mdash;are
+the best company for a writer, for they open
+their hearts to him. A writer can learn how to
+write about humanity by living with humanity,
+instead of with other people who are trying to
+write about humanity."</p>
+
+<p>"But at any rate you have left the part of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">192</a></span>
+country about which you write," I said. "And
+wasn't that one of the things for which you condemned
+our hypothetical writer of Western tales?"</p>
+
+<p>"Not necessarily," said Mr. Harben. "It sometimes
+happens that an author can write about the
+scenes he knows best only after he has gone away
+from them. I know that this is true of myself.</p>
+
+<p>"It's in line with the old saws about 'distance
+lends enchantment' and 'emotion remembered in
+tranquillity,' you know. I believe that Du Maurier
+was able to write his vivid descriptions of life in
+the Latin Quarter of Paris because he went to
+London to do it.</p>
+
+<p>"You see, I absorbed life in Georgia for many
+years. And in New York I can remember it and
+get a perspective on it and write about it."</p>
+
+<p>"Then," I said, "you would go to Georgia, I
+suppose, if you wanted to write a story about life
+in a New York apartment?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Harben thought for a moment. "No," he
+said, slowly, "I don't think that I'd go to Georgia
+to write about New York. I think that a novel
+about New York must be written in New York&mdash;while
+a novel about Dalton, Georgia, must be
+written away from Dalton, Georgia."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">193</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"How do you account for that?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Well," said Mr. Harben, "for one thing there
+is something bracing about New York's atmosphere
+that makes it easier to write when one is
+here. Once I tried to write a novel in Dalton,
+and I simply couldn't do it.</p>
+
+<p>"And the reason why a novel about New York
+must be written in New York is because you can't
+absorb New York as you might absorb Georgia,
+so to speak, and then go away and express it.
+New York is so thoroughly artificial that there is
+nothing about it which a writer can absorb.</p>
+
+<p>"New York hasn't the puzzles and adventures
+and surprises that Georgia has. Everybody
+knows about apartment-houses and skyscrapers
+and subways and elevators and dumb-waiters&mdash;there's
+nothing new to say about them.</p>
+
+<p>"I sometimes think that the reason why the
+modern novel about New York City is so uninteresting
+is because everybody tries to write
+about New York City. And their novels are all
+of one pattern&mdash;necessarily, because life in New
+York City is all of one pattern.</p>
+
+<p>"In bygone days this was not true of New
+York. For instance, Mr. Howells's novels about
+New York City were about a community in which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">194</a></span>
+people lived in real houses and had families and
+friends. In those days life in New York had its
+problems and surprises and adventures; it was not
+lived mechanically and according to a set pattern.</p>
+
+<p>"What I have said about the advisability of an
+author's leaving the scenes about which he is to
+write is not universally true. There are writers
+who do better work by staying in the place where
+the scenes of their stories are laid. For instance,
+Joel Chandler Harris did better work by staying
+in the South than he would have done if he had
+gone away."</p>
+
+<p>"But wasn't that because his negro folk-tales
+were a sort of 'glorified reporting' rather than
+creative work?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"No," said Mr. Harben; "they were creative
+work. Joel Chandler Harris remembered just the
+bare skeleton of the stories as the negro had told
+them to him. And he developed them imaginatively.
+That was creative work. And he did
+most of his writing, and the best of his writing,
+in the office of <i>The Constitution</i>."</p>
+
+<p>"In view of what you said about the difficulty
+of absorbing New York life," I suggested, "I suppose
+that, in your opinion, the great American
+novel will not be written about New York."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">195</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"What do you mean by the great American
+novel?" asked Mr. Harben. "So far as I know
+there is no great English novel or great Russian
+novel."</p>
+
+<p>"I suppose that the term means a novel inevitably
+associated with the national literature,"
+I said. "You cannot think of English literature
+without thinking of <i>Vanity Fair</i>, for instance.
+Certainly there is no American novel so conspicuously
+a reflection of our national life as that
+novel is of English life."</p>
+
+<p>"Well," said Mr. Harben, "it is difficult to
+think of American literature or of American life
+without thinking of the novels of William Dean
+Howells. But the great American novel, to use
+that term, would be less likely to come into being
+than the great English novel.</p>
+
+<p>"You see, the United States is not as compact
+as England. London, it may be said, is England;
+it has all the characteristics of England, and in
+the season all England may be met there."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Harben is not in sympathy with the theories
+of some of our modern realists.</p>
+
+<p>"The trouble with the average realist," he
+said, "is that he doesn't believe that the emotions
+are real. As a matter of fact, the greatest<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">196</a></span>
+source of material for the novelist is to be found
+in the emotional and spiritual side of human
+nature. If writers were more receptive to spiritual
+and emotional impressions they would make
+better novels. It is the soul of man that the
+greatest novels are written about&mdash;there is Dostoievski's
+<i>Crime and Punishment</i>, for example!"</p>
+
+<p>In spite of his criticisms of some of the methods
+of the modern realists, Mr. Harben believes
+strongly in the importance of one realistic dogma,
+that which has to do with detailed description.</p>
+
+<p>"Why is it that <i>Pepys's Diary</i> is interesting to
+us?" he asked. "It is because of its detail.</p>
+
+<p>"But if Pepys had been a Howells&mdash;if he had
+been as careful in describing great things as he
+was in describing small things&mdash;then his <i>Diary</i>
+would be ten times more valuable to us than it
+is. And so Howells's novels will be valuable to
+people who read them a thousand years from now
+to get an idea of how we live.</p>
+
+<p>"That is, Howells's novels will be valuable if
+people read novels in the years that are to come!
+Perhaps they will not be reading novels or anything
+else. For all we know, thought-transference
+may become as common a thing as telephony is
+now. And if this comes to pass nobody will read!"</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">198</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">199</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>LITERATURE IN THE COLLEGES</i></h2>
+
+<h4>JOHN ERSKINE</h4>
+
+<p>Brown of Harvard is no more. The play
+of that name may still be running, but of
+Harvard life it is now about as accurate a picture
+as <i>Trelawney of the Wells</i> is of modern English
+life. At Harvard, and at all the great American
+universities, the dashing, picturesque young athlete
+is no longer the prevailing type of the undergraduate
+ideal.</p>
+
+<p>Of course, undergraduate athletics and undergraduate
+athletes persist&mdash;it would be a tragedy
+if they did not&mdash;but the type of youth that has
+been rather effectively denominated the "rah-rah
+boy" is increasingly difficult to find. His place
+has been taken, not by the "grind," the plodding,
+prematurely old student, caring only for his
+books and his scholastic record, but by a normal
+young man, aware that the campus is not the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">200</a></span>
+most important place in the world; aware, in
+fact, that the university is not the universe.</p>
+
+<p>This young man knows about class politics, but
+also about international politics; about baseball,
+but also about contemporary literature. He is
+much more a citizen than his predecessor of ten
+years since, less provincial, less aristocratic. And
+he not only enjoys literature, but actually desires
+to create it.</p>
+
+<p>The chief enthusiasm at Harvard seems to be
+the drama; indeed, the Brown of Harvard to-day
+must be represented not as a crimson-sweatered
+gladiator but as a cross between Strindberg and
+George M. Cohan. At Columbia&mdash;I have Prof.
+John Erskine's word for it&mdash;there has lately
+developed a genuine interest in&mdash;what do you
+suppose? Poetry!</p>
+
+<p>I interviewed the bulletin-board outside Hamilton
+Hall before I interviewed Professor Erskine,
+and it, too, surprised me. It was not the bulletin-board
+of my not altogether remote undergraduate
+days. It bore notices telling of a meeting of the
+"Forum for Religious Discussion," of an anti-militaristic
+mass-meeting, of a rehearsal of an
+Elizabethan drama. It was a sign of the times.</p>
+
+<p>Professor Erskine said that undergraduate ideals<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">201</a></span>
+had greatly changed during the last few years.
+I asked him how this had come to pass.</p>
+
+<p>"Well," he replied, "I think that college life
+reflects the ordinary life of the world more closely
+than is usually believed. This is a day of general
+cultural and spiritual awakening. The college
+student is waking, just as everybody else is waking;
+like everybody else, he is becoming more
+interested in the great things of life. There is
+no reason why the college walls should shut him
+in from the hopes, ambitions, and problems of
+the rest of humanity.</p>
+
+<p>"It isn't only the boys that have changed&mdash;the
+parents have changed too. Time was when the
+father and mother wanted their son to go to college
+so that he could join a group of pleasant, nice-mannered
+boys of good family. Now they have a
+definite idea of the practical value of a college education,
+they send their son to college intelligently.</p>
+
+<p>"Also, the whole theory of teaching has changed.
+The purely Germanic system has been superseded
+by something more humane. The old idea of
+scholarship for its own sake is no longer insisted
+upon. Instead, the subjects taught are treated
+in their relation to life, the only way in which
+they can be of real interest to the students.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">202</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"You will look in vain in the modern university
+for the old type of absent-minded, dry-as-dust
+professor. He has been superseded by the professor
+who is a man as well as a scholar. And
+naturally he approaches his subject and his classes
+in a different spirit from that of his predecessor.</p>
+
+<p>"We have a new sort of teacher of English.
+He is not now (as was once often the case) a retired
+clergyman, or a specialist recruited from
+some unliterary field. He is, in many cases, a
+creative artist, a dramatist, a novelist, or a poet.</p>
+
+<p>"When I was in college this was not generally
+true. Then such a professor as George Edward
+Woodberry or Brander Matthews was unique.
+Now the college wants poets and creative writers."</p>
+
+<p>These are Professor Erskine's actual words.
+I asked him to repeat his last statement and he
+said, apparently with no sense of the amazement
+which his words caused in me, "The college wants
+the poets!" The stone which the builders rejected
+is become the head of the corner.</p>
+
+<p>But, then, there are poets and poets. There
+is, for example, Prof. Curtis Hidden Page. There
+is also one John Erskine, author of <i>Actæon and
+Other Poems</i>, and Adjunct Professor of English
+at Columbia University. There is also Prof.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">203</a></span>
+Alfred Noyes. But there are also some thousand
+or so poets in the United States who will be surprised
+to know that the college wants them.
+Academic appreciation of poets has generally
+consisted of a cordial welcome given their collected
+works two hundred years after their deaths.</p>
+
+<p>"English as a cultural finish," Professor Erskine
+continued, "has gone by the board. English
+is taught nowadays with as much seriousness as
+philosophy or history. Art in all its forms is considered
+as the history of the race, and treated
+seriously by the student as well as by the professor.
+To-day the students regard Shakespeare
+and Tennyson as very important men. They
+study them as in a course in philosophy they
+would study Bergson. Literature, philosophy,
+and history have been drawn together as one subject,
+as they should be."</p>
+
+<p>"What," I asked, "are some of the extra-curricular
+manifestations of literary interest among
+the students?"</p>
+
+<p>"In the first place," he answered, "the extraordinary
+amount of writing done by the students.
+It is not at all unusual now for a Columbia student
+to sell his work to the regular magazines.
+The student who writes for the magazines and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">204</a></span>
+newspapers is no longer a novelty. Randolph
+Bourne, who was recently graduated, contributed
+a number of essays to the <i>Atlantic Monthly</i> during
+his junior and senior years.</p>
+
+<p>"Many of the students write for the newspapers.
+The better sort of newspaper humorists
+have had a strong influence on the undergraduate
+mind; they have shown the way to writing things
+that are funny but have an intellectual appeal.
+This has resulted in the production of some
+really excellent light verse. Also, Horace's stock
+has gone up.</p>
+
+<p>"During the last two years some remarkable
+plays have been handed into the Columbia University
+Dramatic Association. Not only were they
+serious, but also they were highly poetic.</p>
+
+<p>"And this," said Professor Erskine, "marks
+what I hope is the distinguishing literary atmosphere
+at Columbia. The trend of the plays
+written by Columbia students is strongly poetic.
+This is not true, perhaps, of the plays written by
+students of other institutions. The writers of
+plays want to write poetic plays, and&mdash;what is
+perhaps even more surprising&mdash;the other students
+do not consider poetic drama 'high-brow stuff.'</p>
+
+<p>"Philolexian, the oldest of the Columbia literary<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">205</a></span>
+societies, has been producing Elizabethan
+plays. These plays have been enthusiastically received,
+and the enthusiasm does not seem to show
+any signs of dying down. The students come to
+the study of these plays with a feeling of familiarity,
+for they have seen them acted."</p>
+
+<p>"Does this enthusiasm for literature show itself
+in the college magazine?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"It shows itself," answered Professor Erskine,
+"by the absence of a literary magazine.
+The literary magazine has completely collapsed.
+In small colleges, far away from the cities where
+the regular magazines are published, the college
+magazine is the only available outlet for the work
+of the students who can write. But here in New
+York the students know the condition of the
+literary market, and the more skilful writers
+among them do not care to give their writings to
+an amateur publication when they can sell them
+off the campus. So the <i>Columbia Monthly</i> got
+only second-best material. The boys who really
+could write would not sacrifice their work by
+burying it in a college publication, so the <i>Columbia
+Monthly</i> died.</p>
+
+<p>"The history of a literary club we have up
+here, called Boar's Head, is significant. It was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">206</a></span>
+started as a sort of revival of an older organization
+called King's Crown. At first the program
+consisted of an address at each meeting by some
+prominent writer. For a while the meetings were
+well attended, but gradually the interest died
+down.</p>
+
+<p>"At length I found what the trouble was&mdash;the
+boys wanted to do their own entertaining. Now
+work by the members is read at every meeting;
+there are no addresses by outsiders.</p>
+
+<p>"And here again the poetic trend of the undergraduate
+mind at Columbia is displayed. The
+Scribblers' Club, which consisted of short-story
+writers, is dead&mdash;there were not enough short-story
+writers to support it. And at the meetings
+of Boar's Head there have been read, during the
+past two years, only one or two short stories.</p>
+
+<p>"The boys bring plays and poems to the Boar's
+Head meetings, but not short stories. Last year
+most of the poems which were read were short
+lyrics. Toward the end of last year and during
+the present year longer poems have been read.
+They are not poems in the Masefield manner;
+they are modeled rather on Keats and Coleridge.
+This fact has interested me because the magazines,
+as a rule, have not been buying long poems.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">207</a></span>
+I was interested to see that William Stanley
+Braithwaite, in his excellent <i>Anthology of Magazine
+Verse and Year-Book of American Poetry</i>,
+calls attention to the increasing popularity of the
+longer poem.</p>
+
+<p>"Last year Boar's Head decided to bring out
+a little book containing the best of the poems
+that were read at its meetings. A number of
+subscribers at twenty-five cents each were procured,
+and <i>Quad Ripples</i> was published. It contained
+only short poems. This year Boar's Head
+has published <i>Odes and Episodes</i>, a collection of
+light verse by one of its former members, Archie
+Austin Coates. It soon will publish a collection
+of poems read at its meetings, and all these poems
+are long. Some of these poems are so good that
+it is a real sacrifice for the boys to have them
+printed in this book instead of in some magazine.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course, there were always 'literary men'
+at Columbia, but they were considered unusual.
+Now they no longer even form a class by themselves.
+One of our best writers of light verse is
+the captain of the baseball team.</p>
+
+<p>"Speaking of light verse and baseball," continued
+Professor Erskine, "there is a certain connection
+between the <i>Columbia Monthly</i> and football,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">208</a></span>
+besides the obvious parallel which lies in
+the fact that both have ceased to exist. Some of
+the boys express eagerness to revive the college
+magazine, just as they express eagerness to revive
+football. But it is, I believe, merely a matter of
+pride with them. They are eager to have football
+and to have a college magazine; they are
+not so eager to contribute to the support of either
+institution.</p>
+
+<p>"One proof of the literary renascence of Columbia
+is that the essays written in the regular course
+of the work in philosophy and in English are
+better than ever before."</p>
+
+<p>"Do you believe," I asked, "that being in the
+city has had a good effect on literary activity
+among Columbia students?"</p>
+
+<p>He answered: "I do think so, decidedly. It
+has produced an extreme individualism and has
+given the boys enterprising minds. It is true
+that it has its disadvantages, it has made the
+student, so to speak, centrifugal, and has destroyed
+collegiate co-operation of the old sort.
+But it has produced an original, independent type
+of student.</p>
+
+<p>"The older type of college student was interested
+in football because he knew that people<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">209</a></span>
+expected him to be interested in football. The
+Columbia student of to-day is interested in poetry,
+not because it is a Columbia tradition to be
+interested in poetry, but because his tastes are
+naturally literary."</p>
+
+<p>Several of the causes of this poetic renascence
+at Columbia had been mentioned in the course of
+our conversation, but Professor Erskine had ignored
+one of the most important of them. So I
+will mention it now. It is John Erskine.</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">212</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">213</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>CITY LIFE VERSUS LITERATURE</i></h2>
+
+<h4>JOHN BURROUGHS</h4>
+
+
+<p>"Well," said John Burroughs, "she doesn't
+seem to want us out here, so I guess we'll
+have to go in." So we left the little summer-house
+overlooking the Hudson and went into the bark-walled
+study.</p>
+
+<p>Now, "she" was a fat and officious robin, and
+her nest was in a corner of the summer-house just
+over my head, as I sat with the poet-naturalist.
+The nest was full of hungry and unprepossessing
+young robins, and the mother robin seemed to
+be annoyed in her visits to it by our talk. As
+we walked to the study, leaving to the robin
+family undisputed possession of the summer-house,
+I heard John Burroughs say in tones of
+mild indignation, half to himself and half to me:</p>
+
+<p>"I won't stand this another year! This is the
+third year she's taken possession of that summer-house,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">214</a></span>
+and next May she simply must build her
+nest somewhere else!"</p>
+
+<p>Nevertheless, I think that this impudent robin
+will rear her 1917 brood in John Burroughs's
+summer-house, if she wants to.</p>
+
+<p>When I walked up from the station to Riverby&mdash;John
+Burroughs's twenty-acre home on the west
+shore of the Hudson&mdash;I was surprised by the
+agility of my seventy-nine-year-old companion.
+He walked with the elastic step of a young man,
+and his eyes and brain were as alert as in the
+days when he showed Emerson and Whitman the
+wild wonders of the hills.</p>
+
+<p>"Living in the city," he said, "is a discordant
+thing, an unnatural thing. The city is a place
+to which one goes to do business; it is a place
+where men overreach one another in the fight for
+money. But it is not a place in which one can
+live.</p>
+
+<p>"Years ago, I think, it was possible to have a
+home in the city. I used to think that a home
+in Boston might possibly be imagined. But no
+one can have a home in New York in all that
+noise and haste.</p>
+
+<p>"Sometimes I am worried by the thought of
+the effect that life in the city will have on coming<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">215</a></span>
+generations. All this grind and rush and roar of
+the Subway and the surface cars must have some
+effect on the children of New-Yorkers. And that
+effect cannot be good.</p>
+
+<p>"And what effect can it have on our literature?
+It might produce, I suppose, in the writer's mind,
+a sense of the necessity of haste, a passionate
+desire to get his effect as quickly as possible. But
+can it give him sharpness of intellect and keenness
+of æsthetic perception! I'd like to think so, but I
+can't. I don't see how literature can be produced
+in the city. Literature must have repose, and there
+is no repose in New York so far as I can see.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course I have no right to speak for other
+writers. Some people can find repose in the city&mdash;I
+can't. I hear that people write on the trains,
+on the omnibus, and in the Subway&mdash;I don't see
+how they do it!"</p>
+
+<p>"Have you noticed," I asked, as we left the
+lane and walked down a grassy slope toward the
+study, "that the city has not as yet set its mark
+on our literature?"</p>
+
+<p>"I think," said John Burroughs, "that much of
+our modern fiction shows what I may call a
+metropolitan quality; it seems made up of showy
+streets and electric light. But I don't know. I<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">216</a></span>
+don't read much fiction. I turn more to poetry
+and to meditative essays. Some poets find beauty
+in the city, and they must, I suppose, find repose
+there. Richard Watson Gilder spent nearly all
+his life in a city and reflected the life of the city
+in his poems. And Edmund Clarence Stedman
+was thoroughly a poet of the city. I don't think
+that any of Emerson's poems smack of the city.
+They smack of the country, and of Emerson's
+study in the country, his study under the pines,
+where, as he wrote:</p>
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i2">the sacred pine-tree adds<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">To the leaves her myriads.<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>"Of the younger poets, John James Piatt has
+written beautifully of the city. He wrote a very
+fine poem called 'The Morning Street,' which
+appeared in the <i>Atlantic Monthly</i> some years ago.
+In it he describes vividly the hush of early morning
+in a great city, when the steps of a solitary
+traveler echo from the walls of the sleeping houses.
+I don't suppose Piatt is known to many readers
+of this generation. He was a friend of Howells,
+and was the co-author with Howells of <i>Poems by
+Two Friends</i>, published in the early sixties. This
+was Howells's first venture."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">217</a></span></p>
+
+<p>We were in the bark-walled study now, seated
+before the great stone fireplace, in which some
+logs were blazing. On the stone shelf I saw,
+among the photographs of Carlyle and Emerson
+and other friends of my host, a portrait of Whitman.</p>
+
+<p>"Your friend, Walt Whitman," I said, "got
+inspiration from the city."</p>
+
+<p>"Yes," said John Burroughs, "he got inspiration
+from the city, but you wouldn't call his poems
+city poetry. His way of writing wasn't metropolitan,
+you know; you might say that he treated
+the city by a country method. What he loved
+about the city was its people&mdash;he loved the throngs
+of men, he loved human associations.</p>
+
+<p>"But he was a born lover of cities, Whitman
+was. He loved the city in all its phases, mainly
+because he was such a lover of his kind, of the
+'human critter,' as he calls him. Whitman spent
+most of his life in the city, and was more at home
+there than in the country. He came to Brooklyn
+when he was a boy, and there he worked in a law-office,
+and as a printer and on the <i>Eagle</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"For a while, I remember, he drove a 'bus up
+and down Broadway when the driver, who was
+a friend of his, was sick. That's where he got<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">218</a></span>
+the stuff he put in <i>The Funeral of an Old Omnibus-driver</i>.
+He put in it all the signs and catch-words
+of the 'bus-drivers."</p>
+
+<p>John Burroughs pointed his steady old hand at
+a big framed photograph on the wall. It is an
+unusual portrait of Walt Whitman, showing him
+seated, with his hands clasped, with a flaring shirt
+collar, like a sailor's.</p>
+
+<p>"Whitman," John Burroughs continued, "seems
+to be appealing more and more to young men.
+But in the modern Whitmanesque young poets
+I don't see much to suggest Whitman, except in
+form. They do clever things, but not elemental
+things, not things with a cosmic basis. Whitman,
+with all his commonness and nearness, reached
+out into the abysmal depths, as his imitators fail
+to do. I think Robert Frost has been influenced
+by Whitman. His <i>North of Boston</i> is very
+good; it is genuine realism; it is a faithful, convincing
+picture of New England farm life. When
+I first saw the book I didn't think I'd read three
+pages of it, but I read it all with keen interest.
+It's absolutely true.</p>
+
+<p>"I used to see Whitman often when he and I
+were working in Washington. And he came up
+to see me here. When I was in Washington<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">219</a></span>
+Whitman used to like to come up to our house
+for Sunday morning breakfast. Mrs. Burroughs
+makes capital pancakes, and Walt was very fond
+of them, but he was always late for breakfast.
+The coffee would boil over, the griddle would
+smoke, car after car would go jingling by, and
+no Walt. But a car would stop at last, and Walt
+would roll off it and saunter up to the door&mdash;cheery,
+vigorous, serene, putting every one in
+good humor. And how he ate! He radiated
+health and hopefulness. This is what made his
+work among the sick soldiers in Washington of
+such inestimable value. Every one who came
+into personal relations with him felt his rare, compelling
+charm.</p>
+
+<p>"Very few young literary men of Whitman's
+day accepted him. Stedman did, and the fact
+is greatly to his credit. Howells and Aldrich
+were repelled by his bigness. All the Boston poets
+except Emerson hesitated. Emerson didn't hesitate&mdash;unlike
+Lowell and Holmes, he kept open
+house for big ideas."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. Burroughs what, in his opinion,
+had brought about the change in the world's
+attitude toward Whitman.</p>
+
+<p>"Well," he replied, looking thoughtfully into<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_220" id="Page_220">220</a></span>
+the radiant depths of the open fire, "when Whitman
+first appeared we were all subservient to the
+conventional standards of English literature. We
+understood and appreciated only the pretty and
+exact. Whitman came in his working-man's garb,
+in his shirt sleeves he sauntered into the parlor of
+literature.</p>
+
+<p>"We resented it. But the young men nowadays
+are more liberal. More and more Whitman
+is forcing on them his open-air standards.
+Science supplemented by the human heart gives
+us a bigger and freer world than our forefathers
+knew. And then the European acceptance of
+Whitman had had its effect. We take our point
+of view so largely from Europe. And a force like
+Whitman's must be felt slowly; it's a cumulative
+thing."</p>
+
+<p>"You believe," I said, "that Whitman is our
+greatest poet?"</p>
+
+<p>"Oh yes," he replied, "Whitman is the greatest
+poet America has produced. He is great with the
+qualities that make Homer and the classic poets
+great. Emerson is more precious, more intellectual.
+Whitman and Emerson are our two greatest
+poets."</p>
+
+<p>While we strolled over the pleasant turf and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">221</a></span>
+watched a wood-thrush resting in the cool of the
+evening above her half-built nest among the
+cherry blossoms, John Burroughs returned to the
+subject that we had discussed on our way from
+the station&mdash;the city's evil effect on literature.</p>
+
+<p>"Business life," he said, "is inimical to poetry.
+To write poetry you must get into an atmosphere
+utterly different from that of the city. And one
+of the greatest of all enemies of literature is the
+newspaper. The style of writing that the newspaper
+has brought into existence is as far as
+possible from art and literature. When you are
+writing for a daily paper, you don't try to say a
+thing in a poetic or artistic way, but in an efficient
+way, in a business-like way. There is no appeal to
+the imagination, no ideality. A newspaper is a
+noisy thing that goes out into the street and shouts
+its way into the attention of people.</p>
+
+<p>"If you are going to write poetry you must
+say to certain phases of the newspapers, 'Get thee
+behind me, Satan!' A poet can't be developing
+his gossiping faculty and turning everything hot
+off the griddle. The daily paper is a new institution,
+and it has come to stay. But it has bad manners,
+and it is the enemy of all meditation, all
+privacy, all things that make for great art.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">222</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"It's the same way with nature and writing
+about nature. From nature we get not literature,
+but the raw material for literature. It is very
+important for us to remember that the bee does
+not get honey from the flowers; it makes honey
+from what it gets from the flowers. What it gets
+from the flowers is nothing but sweet water. The
+bee gets its sweet water, retires, thinks it over, and
+by a private process makes it into honey.</p>
+
+<p>"So many nature-writers fail to profit by the
+example of the bee. They go into the woods and
+come out again and write about their experience&mdash;but
+they don't give us honey. They don't retire
+and subject what they find in the woods to
+a private process. They don't give us honey;
+they give us just a little sweet water, pretty
+thoroughly diluted.</p>
+
+<p>"In my own work&mdash;if I may mention it in all
+humbleness&mdash;I have tried for years not to give
+the world just a bare record, but to flavor it,
+so to speak, with my own personality, as the bee
+turns the sweet water that it gets into honey by
+adding its own formic acid.</p>
+
+<p>"If I lived in the city I couldn't do any writing,
+unless I succeeded in obliterating the city from
+my consciousness. But I shouldn't try to force<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">223</a></span>
+my standards on every one. Other men live in
+the cities and write&mdash;Carlyle did most of his work
+in London. But he lived a secluded life even in
+the city, and he had to have his yearly pilgrimage
+to Scotland."</p>
+
+<p>It is some years since John Burroughs has
+written poetry, although all his prose is clearly
+the work of a poet. And it is safe to say that
+better known than any of his intimate prose
+studies of the out-of-door world&mdash;better known
+even than <i>Wake Robin</i> and that immortal <i>A Hunt
+for the Nightingale</i> and <i>In Fresh Fields</i>&mdash;is one of
+his poems, <i>Waiting</i>, the poem that begins:</p>
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i0">Serene, I fold my hands and wait,<br /></span>
+<span class="i2">Nor care for wind, nor tide, nor sea;<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">I rave no more 'gainst time or fate,<br /></span>
+<span class="i2">For lo! my own shall come to me.<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>"I wrote <i>Waiting</i>," he said, "in 1862, when
+I was reading medicine in the office of a country
+physician. It was a dingy afternoon, and I was
+feeling pretty blue. But the thought came to
+me&mdash;I suppose I got it from Goethe or some of the
+Orientals, probably by way of Emerson&mdash;that
+what belonged to me would come to me in time,
+if I waited&mdash;and if I also hustled. So I waited
+and I hustled, and my little poem turned out to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">224</a></span>
+be a prophecy. My own has come to me, as I
+never expected it to come. The best friends I
+have were seeking me all the while. There's
+Henry Ford; he had read all my books, and he
+came to me&mdash;that great-hearted man, the friend
+of all the birds, and my friend.</p>
+
+<p>"The poem first appeared in the <i>Knickerbocker
+Magazine</i>. That magazine was edited by a Cockney
+named Kinneha Cornwallis. It ran long
+enough to print one of Cornwallis's novels, and
+then it died. I remember that the <i>Knickerbocker
+Magazine</i> never paid me for <i>Waiting</i>, and the
+poem didn't attract any attention until Whittier
+printed it in his <i>Songs of Three Centuries</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"It has been changed and tampered with and
+had all sorts of things done to it. It was found
+among the manuscripts of a poet down South
+after his death, and his literary executor was
+going to print it in his book. He wrote to me
+and asked if I could show a date for it earlier
+than 1882. I said, 'Yes, 1862!' and that settled
+that matter.</p>
+
+<p>"There was a man in Boston that I wanted
+to kick! He wrote to me and asked if he could
+print <i>Waiting</i> on a card and circulate it among
+his friends. I told him he could, and sent him<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">225</a></span>
+an autographed copy to make sure he'd get it
+straight. He sent me a package of the printed
+cards, and I found that he had added a stanza
+to it&mdash;a religious stanza, all about Heaven's
+gate! He had left out the second stanza, and
+added this religious stanza. He was worried
+because God had been left out of my poem&mdash;poor
+God, ignored by a little atom like me!</p>
+
+<p>"When people ask me where I got the idea in
+it, I generally say that my parents were old-school
+Baptists and believed in foreordination, and
+that's the way that foreordination cropped out
+in me&mdash;it's a sort of transcendental version of
+foreordination. I think the poem is true&mdash;like
+attracts like; it's the way in which we are constituted,
+rather than any conscious factor, that
+insures success. It's that that makes our fortunes,
+it's that that is the 'tide in the affairs of
+men' that Shakespeare meant."</p>
+
+<p>A few rods from John Burroughs's riverside
+house a brown thrush is building her nest in a
+cherry-tree. She is a bird of individual ideas,
+and is thoroughly convinced that paper, not
+twigs and leaves, forms the proper basis for her
+work. It is pleasant to think of John Burroughs
+seated in his study communing with the memories<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">226</a></span>
+of Whitman and Emerson, and his other
+great dead friends. But it is pleasanter to think
+of him, as I saw him, anxious and intent, his
+great white beard mingled with the cherry blossoms,
+as he strolled over to fix the paper base
+of the thrush's nest so that the wind could not
+destroy it.</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">228</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">229</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>"EVASIVE IDEALISM" IN LITERATURE</i></h2>
+
+<h4>ELLEN GLASGOW</h4>
+
+<p>What is the matter with American literature?
+There are many answers that
+might be made to this often-asked question.
+"Nothing" might be one answer. "Commercialism"
+might be another. But the answer
+given by Ellen Glasgow, whose latest successful
+novel of American manners and morals is <i>Life
+and Gabriella</i>, is "evasive idealism."</p>
+
+<p>I found the young woman who has found in our
+Southern States themes for sympathetic realism
+rather than picturesque romance temporarily resident,
+inappropriately enough, in a hotel not far
+from Broadway and Forty-second Street. And
+I found her to be a woman of many ideas
+and strong convictions. One strongly felt and
+forcibly expressed conviction was that the "evasive
+idealism" which is evident in so much of our<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">230</a></span>
+popular fiction is in reality the chief blemish on
+the American character, manifesting its baleful
+influence in our political, social, and economic life.
+Miss Glasgow first used the term "evasive idealism"
+in an effort to explain why contemporary
+English novels are better than contemporary
+American novels.</p>
+
+<p>"Certainly," she said, "the novels written by
+John Galsworthy and the other English novelists
+of the new generation are better than anything
+that we are producing in the United States at
+the present time. And I think that the reason
+for this is that in America we demand from our
+writers, as we demand from our politicians, and
+in general from those who theoretically are our
+men of light and leading, an evasive idealism instead
+of a straightforward facing of realities. In
+England the demand is for a direct and sincere
+interpretation of life, and that is what the novelists
+of England, especially the younger novelists, are
+making. But what the American public seems
+to desire is the cheapest sort of sham optimism.
+And apparently our writers&mdash;a great many of
+them&mdash;are ready and eager to meet this demand.</p>
+
+<p>"You know the sort of book which takes best
+in this country. It is the sort of book in which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">231</a></span>
+there is not from beginning to end a single attempt
+to portray a genuine human being. Instead
+there are a number of picturesque and attractive
+lay figures, and one of them is made to develop
+a whimsical, sentimental, and maudlinly optimistic
+philosophy of life.</p>
+
+<p>"That is what the people want&mdash;a sugary
+philosophy, utterly without any basis in logic or
+human experience. They want the cheapest
+sort of false optimism, and they want it to be
+uttered by a picturesque, whimsical character,
+in humorous dialect. Books made according to
+this receipt sell by the hundreds of thousands.</p>
+
+<p>"I don't know which is the more tragic, the
+fact that a desire for this sort of literary pabulum
+exists, or the fact that there are so many writers
+willing to satisfy that desire. But I do know
+that the widespread enthusiasm for this sort of
+writing is the reason for the inferiority of our
+novels to those of England. And, furthermore,
+I think that this evasive idealism, this preference
+for a pretty sham instead of the truth, is evident
+not only in literature, but in every phase of
+American life.</p>
+
+<p>"Look at our politics! We tolerate corruption;
+graft goes on undisturbed, except for some sporadic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">232</a></span>
+attacks of conscience on the part of various
+communities. The ugliness of sin is there, but
+we prefer not to look at it. Instead of facing the
+evil and attacking it manfully we go after any
+sort of a false god that will detract our attention
+from our shame. Just as in literature we want
+the books which deal not with life as it is, but
+with life as it might be imagined to be lived, so
+in politics we want to face not hard and unpleasant
+facts, but agreeable illusions.</p>
+
+<p>"Nevertheless," said Miss Glasgow, "I think
+that in literature there are signs of a movement
+away from this evasive idealism. It is much more
+evident in England than in America, but I think
+that in the course of time it will reach us, too.
+We shall cease to be 'slaves of words,' as Sophocles
+said, and learn that the novelist's duty is to
+understand and interpret life. And when our
+novelists and our readers of novels appreciate the
+advisability of this attitude, then will the social
+and political life of the United States be more
+wholesome than it has been for many a year.
+The new movement in the novel is away from
+sentimental optimism and toward an optimism
+that is genuine and robust."</p>
+
+<p>"Then a novel may be at once optimistic and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">233</a></span>
+realistic?" I said. "That is not in accord with
+the generally received ideas of realism."</p>
+
+<p>"It is true of the work of the great realists,"
+answered Miss Glasgow. "True realism is optimistic,
+without being sentimental."</p>
+
+<p>"What realists have been optimistic?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Well," said Miss Glasgow, "Henry Fielding,
+one of the first and greatest of English realists,
+surely was an optimist. And there was Charles
+Dickens&mdash;often, it is true, he was sentimental,
+but at his best he was a robust optimist.</p>
+
+<p>"But the greatest modern example of the robust
+optimistic realist, absolutely free from sentimentality,
+is George Meredith. Galsworthy, who
+surely is a realist, is optimistic in such works as
+<i>The Freelands</i> and <i>The Patricians</i>. And Meredith
+is always realistic and always optimistic.</p>
+
+<p>"The optimism I mean, the optimism which is
+a distinguishing characteristic of George Meredith's
+works, does not come from an evasion of
+facts, but from a recognition of them. The constructive
+novelist, the novelist who really interprets
+life, never ignores any of the facts of life.
+Instead, he accepts them and builds upon them.
+And he perceives the power of the will to control
+destiny; he knows that life is not what you get<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">234</a></span>
+out of it, but what you put into it. This is what
+the younger English novelists know and what
+our novelists must learn. And it is their growing
+recognition of this spirit that makes me feel that
+the tendency of modern literature is toward democracy."</p>
+
+<p>"What is the connection between democracy
+and the tendency you have described?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"To me," Miss Glasgow answered, "true
+democracy consists chiefly in the general recognition
+of the truth that will create destiny. Democracy
+does not consist in the belief that all men
+are born free and equal or in the desire that they
+shall be born free and equal. It consists in the
+knowledge that all people should possess an opportunity
+to use their will to control&mdash;to create&mdash;destiny,
+and that they should know that they have
+this opportunity. They must be educated to the
+use of the will, and they must be taught that
+character can create destiny.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course, environment inevitably has its
+effect on the character, and, therefore, on will,
+and, therefore, on destiny. You can so oppress
+and depress the body that the will has no chance.
+True democracy provides for all equal opportunities
+for the exercise of will. If you hang a man,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">235</a></span>
+you can't ask him to exercise his will. But if
+you give him a chance to live&mdash;which is the democratic
+thing to do&mdash;then you put before him an
+opportunity to exercise his will."</p>
+
+<p>"But what are the manifestations of this new
+democratic spirit?" I asked. "Is not the war,
+which is surely the greatest event of our time, an
+anti-democratic thing?"</p>
+
+<p>"The war is not anti-democratic," Miss Glasgow
+replied, "any more than it is anti-autocratic.
+Or rather, I may say it is both anti-democratic
+and anti-autocratic. It is a conflict of principles,
+a deadly struggle between democracy and imperialism.
+It is a fight for the new spirit of
+democracy against the old evil order of things.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course, I do not mean that the democracy
+of France and England is perfect. But with all its
+imperfections it is nearer true democracy than is
+the spirit of Germany. We should not expect the
+democracy of our country to be perfect. The
+time has not come for that. 'Man is not man
+as yet,' as Browning said in <i>Paracelsus</i>.</p>
+
+<p>"The war is turning people away from the
+false standards in art and letters which they
+served so long. The highly artificial romantic
+novel and drama are impossible in Europe to-day.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">236</a></span>
+The war has made that sort of thing absolutely
+absurd. And America must be affected by this
+just as every other nation in the world is affected.
+To our novelists and to all of us must come a sense
+of the serious importance of actual life, instead of
+a sense of the beauty of romantic illusions. There
+are many indications of this tendency in our contemporary
+literature. For instance, in poetry we
+have the Spoon River Anthology&mdash;surely a sign
+of the return of the poet to real life. But the
+greatest poets, like the greatest novelists, have always
+been passionately interested in real life.
+Walt Whitman and Robert Browning always were
+realists and always were optimistic. Whitman
+was a most exultant optimist; he was optimistic
+even about dying.</p>
+
+<p>"Among recent books of verse I have been
+much impressed by Masefield's <i>Good Friday</i>.
+There is a work which is both august and sympathetic;
+Mr. Masefield's treatment of his theme
+is realistic, yet thoroughly reverent. There is one
+line in it which I think I never shall forget. It
+is, 'The men who suffer most endure the least.'</p>
+
+<p>"<i>Good Friday</i> is a sign of literature's strong
+tendency toward reality. It seems to me to be
+a phase of the general breaking down of the barriers<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">237</a></span>
+between the nations, the classes, and the
+sexes. But this breaking down of barriers is something
+that most of our novelists have been ignoring.
+Mary Watts has recognized it, but she is
+one of the very few American novelists to do so."</p>
+
+<p>"But this sort of consciousness is not generally
+considered to be a characteristic of the realistic
+novelist," I said. And I mentioned to Miss Glasgow
+a certain conspicuous American novelist whose
+books are very long, very dull, and distinguished
+only by their author's obsession with sex. He, I
+said, was the man of whom most people would
+think first when the word realist was spoken.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course," said Miss Glasgow, "we must distinguish
+between a realist and a vulgarian, and I
+do not see how a writer who is absolutely without
+humor can justly be called a realist. Consider
+the great realists&mdash;Jane Austen, Henry Fielding,
+Anthony Trollope, George Meredith&mdash;they all
+had humor. What our novelists need chiefly are
+more humor and a more serious attitude toward
+life. If our novelists are titanic enough, they
+will have a serious attitude toward life, and if
+they stand far enough off they will have humor.</p>
+
+<p>"I hope," Miss Glasgow added, "that America
+will produce better literature after the war. I<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">238</a></span>
+hope that a change for the better will be evident
+in all branches of literary endeavor. We have
+to-day many novelists who start out with the serious
+purpose of interpreting life. But they don't
+interpret it. They find that it is easier to give the
+people what they want than to interpret life.
+Therefore this change in the character of our
+novels must come after the people themselves are
+awakened to a sense of the importance of real
+life, instead of life sentimentally and deceptively
+portrayed.</p>
+
+<p>"I think that our novels to-day are better than
+they were twenty-five years ago. Of course, we
+have no Hawthorne to-day, but the general average
+of stories is better than it was. We have so
+many accomplished writers of short stories. There
+is Katharine Fullerton Gerould. What an admirable
+artist she is! Mary E. Wilkins has written
+some splendid interpretations of New England
+life, and Miss Jewett reflected the mind and soul
+of a part of our country."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">240</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">241</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>"CHOCOLATE FUDGE" IN THE
+MAGAZINES</i></h2>
+
+<h4>FANNIE HURST</h4>
+
+
+<p>Only a few years ago Fannie Hurst's name
+was unknown to most readers. But in a
+surprisingly short time Miss Hurst's short stories,
+especially her sympathetic and poignantly realistic
+studies of the life of the Jewish citizens of
+New York, have earned for her popular as well
+as critical approval.</p>
+
+<p>Fannie Hurst's fame has been won almost entirely
+through the most widely circulated weekly
+and monthly magazines. And yet when I talked
+to this energetic young woman the other morning
+in her studio in Carnegie Hall, I found her
+attitude toward the magazines anything but
+friendly. She accused them of printing what she
+called "chocolate-fudge" fiction. And she said
+it in a way which indicated that chocolate fudge
+is not her favorite dish.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">242</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"I do not feel," she said, "that the American
+magazine is exerting itself toward influencing our
+fiction for the better. In most cases it is content
+to pander to the untutored public taste instead of
+attempting anything constructive.</p>
+
+<p>"The magazine public is, after all, open to conviction.
+But phlegm and commercialism on the
+part of most of our magazines lead them to give
+the public what it wants rather than what is good
+for it.</p>
+
+<p>"'If chocolate-fudge fiction will sell the magazine,
+give 'em chocolate fudge!' say editors and
+publishers. Small wonder that American fiction-readers
+continue bilious in their demands. Authors,
+meanwhile, who like sweet butter on their
+bread&mdash;it is amazing how many do&mdash;continue to
+postpone that Big Idea, and American fiction
+pauses by the wayside."</p>
+
+<p>"What is the remedy for this condition, Miss
+Hurst?" I asked. "Would matters be better if
+the writers did not have to comply with the demands
+of the magazines&mdash;if they had some other
+means of making a living than writing?"</p>
+
+<p>Miss Hurst did not answer at once. At length
+she said, thoughtfully:</p>
+
+<p>"It would seem that to escape this almost inevitable<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">243</a></span>
+overlapping of bread and sweet butter
+the writer of short stories should not depend upon
+the sale of his work for a living, but should endeavor
+to provide himself with some other source
+of income.</p>
+
+<p>"Theoretically, at least, such a condition would
+eliminate the pot-boilers and safeguard the serious
+worker from the possibility of 'misshaping' his
+art to meet a commercial condition.</p>
+
+<p>"I say theoretically because from my own
+point of view I cannot conceive of short-story
+writing as an avocation. The gentle art of short
+fiction consumes just about six hours of my day
+at the rate of from twenty to twenty-five days on
+a story of from eight to ten thousand words.
+And since I work best from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., I
+can think of no remunerative occupation outside
+those hours except cabaret work or night clerking."</p>
+
+<p>"What about present-day relationship between
+American publishers and authors?" I asked,
+"Do you think they are all they should be?"</p>
+
+<p>"American publishers and authors," Miss Hurst
+replied, "to-day seem to be working somewhat at
+cross-purposes, owing partially, I think, to the
+great commercial significance that has become
+attached to the various rights, such as motion-picture,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">244</a></span>
+serial, dramatic, book, etc., and which
+are to be reckoned with in the sale of fiction.</p>
+
+<p>"There is little doubt that authors have suffered
+at the hands of publishers on these various
+scores, oftener than not the publisher and not
+the author reaping the benefits accruing from
+the author's ignorance of conditions or lack of
+foresight.</p>
+
+<p>"The Authors' League has been formed to
+remedy just that evil&mdash;and it was a crying one.</p>
+
+<p>"On the other hand, it is certain that fiction-writers
+are better paid to-day than ever in the
+history of literature, and if a man is writing a
+seventy-five-dollar story there is a pretty good
+reason why.</p>
+
+<p>"I feel a great deal of hesitancy about the
+present proposed affiliation of authors with labor.
+There is so much to be said on both sides!</p>
+
+<p>"If the publisher represents capital and the
+author labor, my sympathies immediately veer
+me toward labor. But do they? That same question
+has recently been thrashed out by the actors,
+and they have gone over to labor. Scores of our
+most prominent American authors are of that
+same persuasion.</p>
+
+<p>"I cannot help but feel that for publisher and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">245</a></span>
+author to assume the relationship of employer and
+employee is a dangerous step. All forms of labor
+do not come under the same head. And I am
+the last to say that writing is not hard labor.
+But Cellini could hardly have allied himself with
+an iron-workers' guild. All men are mammals,
+but not all mammals are men!</p>
+
+<p>"It seems doubly unfortunate, with the Authors'
+League in existence to direct and safeguard the
+financial destiny of the author, to take a step
+which immediately places the author and publisher
+on the same basis of relationship that exists
+between hod-carrier and contractor.</p>
+
+<p>"As a matter of fact, I am almost wont to
+question the traditional lack of business acumen
+in authors. On the contrary, almost every successful
+author of my acquaintance not only is
+pretty well able to take care of himself, but owns
+a motor-car and a safety-deposit box at the same
+time. And I find the not-so-successful authors
+prodding pretty faithfully to get their prices up.</p>
+
+<p>"The Authors' League is a great institution and
+fills a great need. It was formed for just the purpose
+that seems to be prompting authors to unionize&mdash;to
+instruct authors in their rights and protect
+them against infringements.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">246</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Why unionize? Next, an author will find
+himself obliged to lay aside his pen when the
+whistle blows, and publishers will be finding themselves
+obliged to deal in open-shop literature."</p>
+
+<p>"And what effect are the moving pictures going
+to have on fiction?" I asked. "Will it be good or
+bad?"</p>
+
+<p>"Up to the present," Miss Hurst replied,
+"moving pictures have, in my opinion, been little
+else than a destructive force where American
+fiction is concerned. Picturized fiction is on a
+cheap and sensational level. Even classics and
+standardized fiction are ruthlessly defamed by
+tawdry presentation. With the mechanics of the
+motion picture so advanced, it is unfortunate that
+the photoplay itself is not keeping pace with
+that advancement.</p>
+
+<p>"Motion pictures are in the hands of laymen,
+and they show it. The scenario-writers, so-called
+'staff writers,' have sprung up overnight, so to
+speak, and, from what I understand, when authors
+venture into the field they are at the mercy
+of the moving-picture director.</p>
+
+<p>"Mrs. Frances Hodgson Burnett could not endure
+to sit through the picture presentation of
+<i>Little Lord Fauntleroy</i>, so mutilated was it.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">247</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Of course, scenario-writing is a new art, and
+this interesting form of expression has hardly
+emerged from its infancy. Except perhaps in
+such great spectacles as 'The Birth of a Nation,'
+where, after all, the play is not the thing."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Miss Hurst if she agreed with those who
+believe that Edgar Allan Poe's short stories have
+never been surpassed. I found that she did not.</p>
+
+<p>"I should say," she said, "that since Poe's
+time we have had masters of the short story who
+have equaled him. Poe is, of course, the legitimate
+father of the American short story, and,
+coupled with that fact, was possessed of that kind
+of self-consciousness which enabled him to formulate
+a law of composition which has not been
+without its influence upon our subsequent short
+fiction.</p>
+
+<p>"But in American letters there is little doubt
+that in the last one hundred years the short story
+has made more progress than any other literary
+type. We are becoming not only proficient, but
+pre-eminent in the short story. I can think off-hand
+of quite a group of writers, each of whom
+has contributed short-story classics to our literature.</p>
+
+<p>"There are Robert Louis Stevenson, Henry<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">248</a></span>
+James (if we may claim him), Bret Harte, Mark
+Twain, Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, O. Henry,
+Richard Harding Davis, Jack London, and Booth
+Tarkington. And I am sure that there are various
+others whose names do not occur to me at
+this moment."</p>
+
+<p>"You mentioned O. Henry," I said. "Then
+you do not share Katharine Fullerton Gerould's
+belief that O. Henry's influence on modern fiction
+is bad?"</p>
+
+<p>"I decidedly disagree," said Miss Hurst, with
+considerable firmness, "with the statement that
+O. Henry wrote incidents rather than short
+stories, and is a pernicious influence in modern
+letters. That his structural form is more than
+anecdotal can be shown by an analysis of almost
+any of his plots.</p>
+
+<p>"But it seems pedantic to criticize O. Henry on
+the score of structure. Admitting that the substance
+of his writings does rest on frail framework,
+even sometimes upon the trick, he built with
+Gothic skill and with no obvious pillars of support.</p>
+
+<p>"Corot was none the less a landscape artist
+because he removed that particular brown tree
+from that particular green slope. O. Henry's<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">249</a></span>
+facetiousness and, if you will, his frail structures,
+are no more to be reckoned with than, for instance,
+the extravagance of plot and the morbid
+formality we find in Poe.</p>
+
+<p>"The smiting word and the polished phrase he
+quite frankly subordinated to the laugh, or the
+tear with a sniffle. Just as soon call red woolen
+underwear pernicious!</p>
+
+<p>"The Henry James school has put a super-finish
+upon literature which, it is true, gives the
+same satisfying sense of wholeness that we get
+from a Greek urn. But, after all, chastity is not
+the first and last requisite. O. Henry loved to
+laugh with life! It was not in him to regard it
+with a Mona Lisa smile."</p>
+
+<p>Miss Hurst has confined her attention so closely
+to American metropolitan life that I thought it
+would be interesting to have her opinion as to
+the truth of the remark, attributed to William
+Dean Howells, that American literature is merely
+a phase of English literature. In reply to my
+question she said:</p>
+
+<p>"I agree with Mr. Howells that American
+literature up to now has been rather a phase of
+English literature. His own graceful art is an
+example of cousinship. American literature probably<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">250</a></span>
+will continue to be an effort until our American
+melting-pot ceases boiling.</p>
+
+<p>"<i>David Copperfield</i> and <i>Vanity Fair</i> come from
+a people whose lineage goes back by century-plants
+and not by Mayflowers. Theodore Dreiser
+and Ernest Poole, sometimes more or less inarticulately,
+are preparing us for the great American
+novel. When we reach a proper consistency
+the boiling is bound to cease, and, just as inevitably,
+the epic novel must come."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">252</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">253</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>THE NEW SPIRIT IN POETRY</i></h2>
+
+<h4>AMY LOWELL</h4>
+
+
+<p>Miss Amy Lowell, America's chief advocate
+and practitioner of the new poetry,
+would wear, I supposed, a gown by Bakst, with
+many Oriental jewels. And incense would be
+burning in a golden basin. And Miss Lowell
+would say that the art of poetry was discovered
+in 1916.</p>
+
+<p>But there is nothing exotic or artificial about
+Miss Lowell's appearance and surroundings. Nor
+did the author of <i>Sword Blades and Poppy Seed</i>
+express, when I talked to her the other day, any
+of the extravagant opinions which conservative
+critics attribute to the <i>vers libristes</i>. Miss Lowell
+talked with the practicality which is of New
+England and the serenity which is of Boston;
+she was positive, but not narrowly dogmatic;
+she is keenly appreciative of contemporary poetry,
+but she has the fullest sense of the value of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">254</a></span>
+the great heritage of poetical tradition that has
+come down to us through the ages.</p>
+
+<p>There is so much careless talk of <i>imagisme</i>,
+<i>vers libre</i>, and the new poetry in general that I
+thought it advisable to begin our talk by asking
+for a definition or a description of the new poetry.
+In reply to my question Miss Lowell said:</p>
+
+<p>"The thing that makes me feel sure that there
+is a future in the new poetry is the fact that those
+who write it follow so many different lines of
+thought. The new poetry is so large a subject
+that it can scarcely be covered by one definition.
+It seems to me that there are four definite sorts
+of new poetry, which I will attempt to describe.</p>
+
+<p>"One branch of the new poetry may be called
+the realistic school. This branch is descended
+partly from Whitman and partly from the prose-writers
+of France and England. The leading exponents
+of it are Robert Frost and Edgar Lee
+Masters. These two poets are different from
+each other, but they both are realists, they
+march under the same banner.</p>
+
+<p>"Another branch of the new poetry consists of
+the poets whose work shows a mixture of the
+highly imaginative and the realistic. Their
+thought verges on the purely imaginative, but is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">255</a></span>
+corrected by a scientific attitude of mind. I
+suppose that this particular movement in English
+poetry may be said to have started with Coleridge,
+but in England the movement hardly attained its
+due proportions. Half of literary England followed
+Wordsworth, half followed Byron. It is in
+America that we find the greatest disciple of
+Coleridge in the person of Edgar Allan Poe. The
+force of the movement then went back to France,
+where it showed clearly in Mallarmê and the later
+symbolists. To-day we see this tendency somewhat
+popularized in Vachell Lindsay, although perhaps
+he does not know it. And if I may be so bold
+as to mention myself, I should say that I in common
+with most other imagists belong to this
+branch, that I am at once a fantasist and a realist.</p>
+
+<p>"Thirdly, we have the lyrico-imaginative type
+of poet. Of this branch the best example that
+I can call to mind is John Gould Fletcher. The
+fourth group of the new poets consists of those
+who are descended straight from Matthew Arnold.
+They show the Wordsworth influence corrected
+by experience and education. Browning is in
+their line of descent. Characteristics of their work
+are high seriousness, astringency, and a certain
+pruning down of poetry so that redundancy is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">256</a></span>
+absolutely avoided. Of this type the most striking
+example is Edwin Arlington Robinson."</p>
+
+<p>"Miss Lowell," I said, "the opponents of the
+new poetry generally attack it chiefly on account
+of its form&mdash;or rather, on account of its formlessness.
+And yet what you have said has to do only
+with the idea itself. You have said nothing about
+the way in which the idea is expressed."</p>
+
+<p>"There is no special form which is characteristic
+of the new poetry," said Miss Lowell, "and of course
+'formlessness' is a word which is applied to it only
+by the ignorant. The new poetry is in every form.
+Edgar Lee Masters has written in <i>vers libre</i> and in
+regular rhythm. Robert Frost writes in blank verse.
+Vachell Lindsay writes in varied rhyme schemes. I
+write in both the regular meters and the newer
+forms, such as <i>vers libre</i> and 'polyphonic prose.'</p>
+
+<p>"It is a mistake to suppose, as many conservative
+critics do, that modern poetry is a matter of
+<i>vers libre</i>. <i>Vers libre</i> is not new, but it is valuable
+to give vividness when vividness is desired. <i>Vers
+libre</i> is a difficult thing to write well, and a very
+easy thing to write badly. This particular branch
+of the new poetry movement has been imitated so
+extensively that it has brought the whole movement
+into disrepute in the eyes of casual observers.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">257</a></span>
+But we must remember that no movement is to
+be judged by its obscure imitators. A movement
+must be judged by the few people at its head who
+make the trend. There cannot be many of them.
+In the history of the world there are only a few
+supreme artists, only a small number of great
+artists, only a limited number of good artists.
+And to suppose that we in America at this particular
+moment can be possessed of many artists
+worthy of consideration is ridiculous.</p>
+
+<p>"Undoubtedly the fact that a great number of
+people are engaged to-day in producing poetry is
+a great stimulus and helps to create a proper
+atmosphere for those men whose work may live.
+For it is a curious fact that the artistic names that
+have come down to us are those of men who have
+lived in the so-called great artistic periods, when
+many other men were working at the same thing."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Miss Lowell to tell something of this
+<i>vers libre</i> which is so much discussed and so little
+understood. She said:</p>
+
+<p>"<i>Vers libre</i> is based upon rhythm. Its definition
+is 'A verse form based upon cadence rather
+than upon exact meter.' It is a little difficult to
+define cadence when dealing with poetry. I might
+call it the sense of balance.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">258</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"The unit of <i>vers libre</i> is the strophe, not the
+line or the foot, as in regular meter. The strophe
+is a group of words which round themselves satisfactorily
+to the ear. In short poems this complete
+rounding may take place only at the end,
+making the poem a unit of a single movement,
+the lines serving only to give the slight up-and-down
+effect necessary to the voice when the poem
+is read aloud.</p>
+
+<p>"In longer poems the strophe may be a group
+of lines. Poetry being a spoken and not a written
+art, those not well versed in the various poetic
+forms will find it simpler to read <i>vers libre</i> poems
+aloud, rather than to try to get their rhythm from
+the printed page. For people who are used only
+to the exact meters, the printed arrangement of a
+<i>vers libre</i> poem is a confusing process. To a certain
+extent cadence is dependent upon quantity&mdash;long
+and short syllables being of peculiar importance.
+Words hurried over in reading are balanced
+by words on which the reader pauses.
+Remember, also, that <i>vers libre</i> can be either
+rhymed or unrhymed."</p>
+
+<p>"One objection," I said, "that many critics
+bring up against unrhymed poetry is that it cannot
+be remembered."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">259</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"I cannot see that that is of the slightest importance,"
+Miss Lowell replied. "The music that
+we whistle when we come out of the theater is not
+the greatest music we have heard.</p>
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i0">"Zaccheus he<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">Did climb a tree<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">His Lord to see<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>is easily remembered. But I refuse to think that
+it is great poetry.</p>
+
+<p>"The enemies of <i>vers libre</i>," she continued, "say
+that <i>vers libre</i> is in no respect different from
+oratory. Now, there is a difference between the
+cadence of <i>vers libre</i> and the cadence of oratory.
+Lincoln's Gettysburg address is not <i>vers libre</i>, it
+is rhythmical prose. At the prose end of cadence
+is rhythmical prose; at the verse end is <i>vers libre</i>.
+The difference is in the kind of cadence.</p>
+
+<p>"Recently a writer in <i>The Nation</i> took some of
+Meredith's prose and made it into <i>vers libre</i> poems
+which any poet would have been glad to write.
+Then he took some of my poems and turned them
+into prose, with a result which he was kind
+enough to call beautiful. He then pertinently
+asked what was the difference.</p>
+
+<p>"I might answer that there is no difference.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">260</a></span>
+Typography is not relevant to the discussion.
+Whether a thing is written as prose or as verse is
+immaterial. But if we would see the advantage
+which Meredith's imagination enjoyed in the
+freer forms of expression, we need only compare
+these lyrical passages from his prose works with
+his own metrical poetry."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Miss Lowell about the charge that the
+new poets are lacking in reverence for the great
+poets of the past. She believes that the charge
+is unfounded. Nevertheless, she believes that
+the new poets do well to take the New England
+group of writers less seriously than conservative
+critics would have them take them.</p>
+
+<p>"America has produced only two great poets,
+Whitman and Poe," said Miss Lowell. "The
+rest of the early American poets were cultivated
+gentlemen, but they were more exactly English
+provincial poets than American poets, and they
+were decidedly inferior to the parent stock. The
+men of the New England group, with the single
+exception of Emerson, were cultivated gentlemen
+with a taste for literature&mdash;they never rose above
+that level.</p>
+
+<p>"No one can judge his contemporaries. We
+cannot say with certainty that the poets of this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">261</a></span>
+generation are better than their predecessors.
+But surely we can see that the new poets have
+more originality, more of the stuff out of which
+poetry is made, than their predecessors had,
+aside from the two great exceptions that I have
+mentioned."</p>
+
+<p>"What is the thing that American poetry chiefly
+needs?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Well," said Miss Lowell, "I wish that there
+were a great many changes in our attitude toward
+literature. I wish that no man could expect to
+make a living by writing. I wish that the magazines
+did not pay for contributions&mdash;few of them
+do in France, you know. And I wish that the
+newspapers did not try to review books. But the
+thing that we chiefly need is informed and authoritative
+criticism.</p>
+
+<p>"We have very few critics, we have practically
+none who are writing separate books on contemporary
+verse. When I was writing my <i>French
+Poets</i> I read twenty or thirty books on contemporary
+French poetry, serious books, written by
+critics who make a specialty of the poetry of their
+own day.</p>
+
+<p>"We have nothing like this in America. The
+men who write critical books write of the literature<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">262</a></span>
+of a hundred years ago. No critical mind is
+bent toward contemporary verse. There are a
+few newspaper critics who pay serious attention
+to contemporary verse&mdash;William Stanley Braithwaite,
+O. W. Firkins, and Louis Untermeyer, for
+example&mdash;but there are only a few of them.</p>
+
+<p>"What is to be desired is for some one to be
+as interested in criticism as the poets are in poetry.
+It was the regularity of Sainte-Beuve's 'Causeries
+du Lundi' that gave it its weight. What we want
+is a critic like that, who is neither an old man despairing
+of a better job nor a young man using
+his newspaper work as a stepping-stone to something
+higher. Of course, brilliant criticisms of
+poetry appear from time to time, but what we
+need is criticism as an institution.</p>
+
+<p>"After all," said Miss Lowell, in conclusion,
+"there are only two kinds of poetry, good poetry
+and bad poetry. The form of poetry is a matter
+of individual idiosyncrasy. It is only the very
+young and the very old, the very inexperienced
+or the numbed, who say, 'This is the only way in
+which poetry shall be written!'"</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">264</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">265</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>A NEW DEFINITION OF POETRY</i></h2>
+
+<h4>EDWIN ARLINGTON ROBINSON</h4>
+
+
+<p>At no time in the history of literature have
+the critics been able to agree upon a definition
+of poetry. And the recent popularity of <i>vers
+libre</i> and <i>imagisme</i> has made the definer's task
+harder than ever before. Is rhyme essential to
+poetry? Is rhythm essential to poetry? Can a
+mere reflection of life justly be called poetry, or
+must imagination be present?</p>
+
+<p>I put some of these questions to Edwin Arlington
+Robinson, who wrote <i>Captain Craig</i>, <i>The Children
+of the Night</i>, <i>The Town Down the River</i>, <i>The
+Man Against the Sky</i> and <i>Merlin: A Poem</i>. And
+this man, whom William Stanley Braithwaite and
+other authoritative critics have called the foremost
+of American poets, this student of life, who was revealing
+the mysterious poetry of humanity many
+years before Edgar Lee Masters discovered to the
+world the vexed spirits that haunt Spoon River,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">266</a></span>
+rewarded my questioning with a new definition of
+poetry. He said:</p>
+
+<p>"Poetry is a language that tells us, through a
+more or less emotional reaction, something that
+cannot be said.</p>
+
+<p>"All real poetry, great or small, does this," he
+added. "And it seems to me that poetry has
+two characteristics. One is that it is, after all,
+undefinable. The other is that it is eventually
+unmistakable."</p>
+
+<p>"'Eventually'!" I said. "Then you think that
+poetry is not always appreciated in the lifetime
+of its maker?"</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Robinson smiled whimsically. "I never
+use words enough," he said. "It is not unmistakable
+as soon as it is published, but sooner or
+later it is unmistakable.</p>
+
+<p>"And in the poet's lifetime there are always
+some people who will understand and appreciate
+his work. I really think that it is impossible for
+a real poet permanently to escape appreciation.
+And I can't imagine anything sillier for a man to
+do than to worry about poetry that has once
+been decently published. The rest is in the hands
+of Time, and Time has more than often a way of
+making a pretty thorough job of it."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">267</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"But why is it," I asked, "that a great poet so
+often is without honor in his own generation,
+where mediocrity is immediately famous?"</p>
+
+<p>"It's hard to say," said Mr. Robinson, thoughtfully
+regarding the glowing end of his cigar.
+"Many causes prevent poetry from being correctly
+appraised in its own time. Any poetry
+that is marked by violence, that is conspicuous
+in color, that is sensationally odd, makes an immediate
+appeal. On the other hand, poetry that
+is not noticeably eccentric sometimes fails for
+years to attract any attention.</p>
+
+<p>"I think that this is why so many of Kipling's
+worst poems are greatly overpraised, while some
+of his best poems are not appreciated. <i>Gunga
+Din</i>, which is, of course, a good thing in its way,
+has been praised far more than it deserves, because
+of its oddity. And the poem beginning 'There's
+a whisper down the field' has never been properly
+appreciated. It's one of the very best of Kipling's
+poems, although it is marred by a few lapses
+of taste. One of his greatest poems, by the way,
+<i>The Children of the Zodiac</i>, happens to be in
+prose.</p>
+
+<p>"But I am always revising my opinion of Kipling.
+I have changed my mind about him so<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">268</a></span>
+often that I have no confidence in my critical
+judgment. That is one of the reasons why I
+do not like to criticise my American contemporaries."</p>
+
+<p>"Do you think," I asked, "that this tendency
+to pay attention chiefly to the more sensational
+poets is as characteristic of our generation as of
+those that came before?"</p>
+
+<p>"I think it applies particularly to our own time,"
+he replied. "More than ever before oddity and
+violence are bringing into prominence poets who
+have little besides these two qualities to offer the
+world, and some who have much more. It may
+seem very strange to you, but I think that a great
+modern instance of this tendency is the case of
+Robert Browning. The eccentricities of Browning's
+method are the things that first turned popular
+attention upon him, but the startling quality
+in Browning made more sensation in his own time
+than it can ever make again. I say this in spite
+of the fact that Browning and Wordsworth are
+taken as the classic examples of slow recognition.
+Wordsworth, you know, had no respect for the
+judgment of youth. It may have been sour
+grapes, but I am inclined to think that there was
+a great deal of truth in his opinion.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">269</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"I think it is safe to say that all real poetry is
+going to give at some time or other a suggestion
+of finality. In real poetry you find that something
+has been said, and yet you find also about it a
+sort of nimbus of what can't be said.</p>
+
+<p>"This nimbus may be there&mdash;I wouldn't say
+that it isn't there&mdash;and yet I can't find it in much
+of the self-conscious experimenting that is going
+on nowadays in the name of poetry.</p>
+
+<p>"I can't get over the impression," Mr. Robinson
+went on, with a meditative frown, "that these
+post-impressionists in painting and most of the
+<i>vers libristes</i> in poetry are trying to find some sort
+of short cut to artistic success. I know that
+many of the new writers insist that it is harder
+to write good <i>vers libre</i> than to write good rhymed
+poetry. And judging from some of their results,
+I am inclined to agree with them."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. Robinson if he believed that the
+evident increase in interest in poetry, shown by
+the large sales of the work of Robert Frost and
+Edgar Lee Masters and Rupert Brooke, indicated
+a real renascence of poetry.</p>
+
+<p>"I think that it indicates a real renascence of
+poetry," he replied. "I am sufficiently child-like
+and hopeful to find it very encouraging."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">270</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"Do you think," I asked, "that the poetry that
+is written in America to-day is better than that
+written a generation ago?"</p>
+
+<p>"I should hardly venture to say that," said
+Mr. Robinson. "For one thing, we have no Emerson.
+Emerson is the greatest poet who ever wrote
+in America. Passages scattered here and there
+in his work surely are the greatest of American
+poetry. In fact, I think that there are lines and
+sentences in Emerson's poetry that are as great
+as anything anywhere."</p>
+
+<p>I asked Mr. Robinson whether he thought the
+modern English poets were doing better work
+than their American contemporaries. At first he
+was unwilling to express an opinion on this subject,
+repeating his statement that he mistrusted
+his own critical judgment. But he said:</p>
+
+<p>"Within his limits, I believe that A. E. Housman
+is the most authentic poet now writing in England.
+But, of course, his limits are very sharply drawn.
+I don't think that any one who knows anything
+about poetry will ever think of questioning the
+inspiration of <i>A Shropshire Lad</i>."</p>
+
+<p>"Would you make a similar comment on any
+other poetry of our time?" I asked.</p>
+
+<p>"Well," said Mr. Robinson, reflectively, "I<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">271</a></span>
+think that no one will question the inspiration of
+some of Kipling's poems, of parts of John Masefield's
+<i>Dauber</i>, and some of the long lyrics of
+Alfred Noyes. But I do not think that either
+of these poets gives the impression of finality
+which A. E. Housman gives. But the way in which
+I have shifted my opinion about some of Rudyard
+Kipling's poems, and most of Swinburne's,
+makes me think that Wordsworth was very largely
+right in his attitude toward the judgment of
+youth. But where my opinions have shifted, I
+think now that I always had misgivings. I fancy
+that youth always has misgivings in regard to
+what is later to be modified or repudiated."</p>
+
+<p>Then I asked Mr. Robinson if he thought that
+the war had anything to do with the renascence
+of poetry.</p>
+
+<p>"I can't see any connection," he replied. "The
+only effect on poetry that the war has had, so far
+as I know, is to produce those five sonnets by
+Rupert Brooke. I can't see that it has caused
+any poetical event. And there's no use prophesying
+what the war will or will not do to poetry,
+because no one knows anything about it. The
+Civil War seems to have had little effect on poetry
+except to produce Julia Ward Howe's <i>Battle Hymn</i><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">272</a></span>
+<i>of the Republic</i>, Whitman's poems on the death of
+Lincoln, and Lowell's 'Ode.'"</p>
+
+<p>"Mr. Robinson," I said, "there has been much
+discussion recently about the rewards of poetry,
+and Miss Amy Lowell has said that no poet ought
+to be expected to make a living by writing. What
+do you think about it?"</p>
+
+<p>"Should a poet be able to make a living out of
+poetry?" said Mr. Robinson. "Generally speaking,
+it is not possible for a poet to make a decent
+living by his work. In most cases it would be
+bad for his creative faculties for a poet to make as
+much money as a successful novelist makes. Fortunately,
+there is no danger of that. Now, assuming
+that a poet has enough money to live on, the
+most important thing for him to have is an audience.
+I mean that the best poetry is likely to
+be written when poetry is in the air. If a poet
+with no obligations and responsibilities except to
+stay alive can't live on a thousand dollars a year
+(I don't undertake to say just how he is going
+to get it), he'd better go into some other business."</p>
+
+<p>"Then you don't think," I said, "that literature
+has lost through the poverty of poets?"</p>
+
+<p>"I certainly do believe that literature has lost
+through the poverty of poets," said Mr. Robinson.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">273</a></span>
+"I don't believe in poverty. I never did.
+I think it is good for a poet to be bumped and
+knocked around when he is young, but all the
+difficulties that are put in his way after he gets
+to be twenty-five or thirty are certain to take
+something out of his work. I don't see how they
+can do anything else.</p>
+
+<p>"Some time ago you asked me," said Mr.
+Robinson, "how I accounted for our difficulty in
+making a correct estimate of the poetry of one's
+own time. The question is a difficult one. I
+don't even say that it has an answer. But the
+solution of the thing seems to me to be related
+to what I said about the quality of finality that
+seems to exist in all real poetry. Finality seems
+always to have had a way of not obtruding itself
+to any great extent."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">276</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">277</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>LET POETRY BE FREE</i></h2>
+
+<h4>JOSEPHINE PRESTON PEABODY</h4>
+
+<p>Mrs. Lionel Marks&mdash;or Josephine Preston
+Peabody, to call her by the name which
+she has made famous&mdash;is a poet whose tendency has
+always been toward democracy. From <i>The Singing
+Leaves</i>, her first book of lyrics, to <i>The Piper</i>
+(the dramatic poem which received the Stratford-on-Avon
+prize in 1910), and <i>The Wolf of Gubbio</i>,
+the poetic representation of events in St.
+Francis's life in her latest published book, she
+has chosen for her theme not fantastic and rare
+aspects of nature, nor the new answers of her
+own emotions, but things that are common to
+all normal mankind&mdash;such as love and religion.
+Also, without seeming to preach, she is always
+expressing her love for Liberty, Equality, and
+Fraternity, and although she never dwells upon
+the overworked term, she is as devoted an adherent
+of the brotherhood of man as was William Morris.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">278</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Therefore I was eager to learn whether or not
+she held the opinion&mdash;often expressed during the
+past months&mdash;that poetry is becoming more
+democratic, less an art practised and appreciated
+by the chosen few. Also I wanted to know if she
+saw signs of this democratization of poetry in the
+development of free verse, or <i>vers libre</i>, as those
+who write it prefer to say, in the apparently growing
+tendency of poets to give up the use of rhyme
+and rhythm.</p>
+
+<p>"Certainly, poetry is steadily growing more
+democratic," said Mrs. Marks. "More people
+are writing poetry to-day than fifty years ago,
+and the appreciation of poetry is more general.
+Most poets of genuine calling are writing now with
+the world in mind as an audience, not merely for
+the entertainment of a little literary cult.</p>
+
+<p>"But I do not think that the <i>vers libre</i> fad has
+any connection with this tendency, or with the
+development of poetry at all. Indeed, I do not
+think that the cult is growing; we hear more of
+it in the United States than we did a year or two
+ago, but that is chiefly because London and Paris
+have outworn its novelty, so the <i>vers libristes</i> concentrate
+their energies on Chicago and New York.</p>
+
+<p>"I love some 'free verse.' Certainly, there may<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">279</a></span>
+be times when a poet finds he can express his idea
+or his emotion better without rhyme and rhythm
+than with them. But verse that is ostentatiously
+free&mdash;free verse that obviously has been made deliberately&mdash;that
+is a highly artificial sort of writing,
+bears no more relation to literature than does an
+acrostic. Neither the themes nor the methods
+of those who call themselves <i>vers libristes</i> are
+democratic; they are, in the worst sense of the
+word, the sense which came into use at the time
+of the French Revolution, aristocratic.</p>
+
+<p>"The canon of the <i>vers libristes</i> is essentially
+aristocratic. They contend, absurdly enough, that
+all traditional forms of rhyme and rhythm constitute
+a sort of bondage, and therefore they arbitrarily
+rule them out. Not for them are the
+fetters that bound Shelley's spirit to the earth!
+Also they arbitrarily rule out what they call,
+with their fondness for labels, the 'sociological
+note,' 'didacticism,' 'meanings'&mdash;any ideas or
+emotions, in fact, that may be called communal
+or democratic.</p>
+
+<p>"My own canon is that all themes are fit for
+poetry and that all methods must justify themselves.
+If I may be permitted to make a clumsy
+wooden-toy apothegm I would say that poetry<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">280</a></span>
+is rhythmic without and within. If we turn
+Carlyle's sometimes cloudy prose inside out we
+find that it has a silver lining of poetry.</p>
+
+<p>"Neither can I understand why the <i>vers libristes</i>
+believe that their sort of writing is new. Leopardi
+wrote what would be called good <i>imagisme</i>, although
+the <i>imagistes</i> do not seem to be aware of
+the fact, and the theory that rhyme is undesirable
+in poetry has appeared sporadically time and again
+in the history of poetry. When Sir Philip Sidney
+was alive there were pedants who argued against
+the use of rhyme, and some of them confuted their
+own arguments by writing charming lyrics in the
+traditional manner. By dint of reading the fine
+eye-cracking print in the Globe Edition of Spenser
+I found that the author of the <i>Faerie Queen</i> at
+one time took seriously Gabriel Harvey's arguments
+against rhyme and made an unbelievably
+frightful experiment in rhymeless verse&mdash;as bad
+as the parodists of our band-wagon.</p>
+
+<p>"The other day I asked some one in the Greek
+department of Harvard how to read a fragment
+of Sappho's that I wanted to teach my children
+to say. He said that no one nowadays could
+know how certain of Sappho's poems really should
+be read, because the music for them had been<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">281</a></span>
+lost, and they were all true lyrics, meant to be
+sung and sung by Sappho to music of her own
+making. So you see that poets who avowedly
+make verses that can appeal only to the eye, successions
+of images, in which the position of the
+words on the page is of great importance, believe
+that they are the successors of poets whose work
+was meant not to be read, but to be sung, whose
+verses fitted the regular measure of music.</p>
+
+<p>"As I said before," said Mrs. Marks, smiling,
+"I have no objection to free verse when it is a
+spontaneous expression. But I do object to free
+verse when it is organized into a cult that denies
+other freedoms to other poets! And I object to
+the bigotry of some of the people who are trying
+to impose free verse upon an uninterested world.</p>
+
+<p>"And also I object to the unfairness of some of
+the advocates of free verse. When they compare
+free verse, and what I suppose I must call chained
+verse, they take the greatest example of unrhymed
+poetry that they can find&mdash;the King James version
+of the Book of Job, perhaps&mdash;and say: 'This
+is better than "Yankee Doodle." Therefore, free
+verse is better than traditional verse.'</p>
+
+<p>"You see," said Mrs. Marks, "the commonest
+thing there is, I may say the most democratic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">282</a></span>
+thing, is the rhythm of the heart-beat. A true
+poet cannot ignore this. At the greatest times
+in his life, when he is filled with joy or despair,
+or when he has a sense of portent, man is aware
+of his heart, of its beat, of its recurrent tick, tick;
+he is aware of the rhythm of life. When we are
+dying, perhaps the only sense that remains with
+us is the sense of rhythm&mdash;the feeling that the
+grains of sand are running, running, running out.</p>
+
+<p>"The pulse-beat is a tremendous thing. It is
+the basis of all that men have in common. All life
+is locked up in its regularly recurrent rhythm.
+And it is that rhythm that appears in our love-songs,
+our war-songs, in all the poetry of the
+human cycle from lullabies to funeral chants. In
+the great moments of life men feel that they
+must be sharing, that they must have something
+in common with other men, and so their emotions
+crystallize into the ritual of rhythm, which is the
+most democratic thing that there is.</p>
+
+<p>"Primitive poetry, poetry that comes straight
+from the hearts of the people, sometimes circulating
+for generations without being committed to
+paper, is strongly traditional. The convention of
+regular rhyme and rhythm is never absent. What
+could be more conventional and more democratic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">283</a></span>
+than the old ballad, with its recurrent refrain in
+which the audience joined? Centuries ago in the
+Scotch Highlands the ballad-makers, like the men
+who wrote the 'Come-all-ye's' in our great-grandfather's
+time, used regular rhyme and
+rhythm. And if these poets were not democratic,
+then there never was such a thing as a democratic
+poet."</p>
+
+<p>"But is it not true," I asked, "that Whitman
+is considered the most democratic poet of his day,
+and that his avoidance of rhyme and regular
+rhythm is advanced as proof of his democracy?"</p>
+
+<p>"Whitman," said Mrs. Marks, "was a democrat
+in principle, but not in poetic practice. He
+loved humanity, but he still waits to reach his
+widest audience because his verse lacks strongly
+stressed, communal music. The only poems which
+he wrote that really reached the hearts of the
+people quickly are those which are most nearly
+traditional in form&mdash;<i>When Lilacs Last in Dooryards
+Bloomed</i> and <i>Captain, My Captain!</i> in which
+he used rhyme.</p>
+
+<p>"You see, nothing else establishes such a bond
+with memory as rhyme.</p>
+
+<p>"Did you ever think," said Mrs. Marks, suddenly,
+"that the truest exuberance of life always<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">284</a></span>
+expresses itself rhythmically? Children are generous
+with the most intricate rhythms; they do
+not eat ice-cream in the disorderly grown-up way;
+they eat it in a pattern, turning the saucer around
+and around; they skit alternate flagstones or
+every third step on the stairway. Because they
+are overflowing with life they express themselves
+in rhythm. <i>Vers libre</i> is too grown-up to be the
+most vital poetry; one of the ways in which the
+poet must be like a little child is in possessing
+an exuberance of life. His life must overflow.</p>
+
+<p>"The poets especially remember that Christ
+said, 'I am come that ye might have life and
+that ye might have it more abundantly.'</p>
+
+<p>"The rhythm of life," said Mrs. Marks, thoughtfully.
+"The rhythm of life. Who is conscious
+of his heart-beats except at the great moments of
+life, and who is unconscious of them then? The
+music of poetry is the witness of that intense moment
+when there is discovered to man or woman,
+when there reverberates through his brain and
+being, the tremendous rhythm and refrain whereby
+we live."</p>
+
+<p>Mrs. Marks has no patience with those who use
+the term "sociological" in depreciation of all poetry
+that is not intensely subjective and personal.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">285</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"There are some critics," she said, "who would
+condemn the Lord's Prayer as 'sociological' because
+it begins 'Our Father' instead of 'My
+Father.'</p>
+
+<p>"The true poet must be a true democrat; he
+must, if he can, share with all the world the
+vision that lights him; he must be in sympathy
+with the people. The war has made a great many
+European poets aware of this fact. Think how
+the war changed Rupert Brooke, for instance?
+He had been a most aristocratic poet, making
+poems, some of which could only repel minds less
+in love with the fantastic. But he shared the
+great emotion of his countrymen, and so he wrote
+out of his deeply wakened, sudden simplicity
+those sonnets which they all can understand and
+must forever cherish.</p>
+
+<p>"The war will help make poetry. It has swept
+away the fads and cults from Europe; they find
+a peaceful haven in the United States, but they
+will not live as dogmas. In the democracy that
+is soon to come may all 'isms' founder and lose
+themselves! And may all true freedoms come
+into their own, with the maker, his mind and his
+tools."</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">288</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">289</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>THE HERESY OF SUPERMANISM</i></h2>
+
+<h4>CHARLES RANN KENNEDY</h4>
+
+
+<p>"But, of course," said Charles Rann Kennedy,
+violently (he says most things rather violently),
+"you understand that the war's most
+important effect on literature was clearly evident
+long before the war began!"</p>
+
+<p>I did not understand this statement, and said
+so. Thereupon the author of <i>The Servant in the
+House</i> and <i>The Terrible Meek</i> said:</p>
+
+<p>"We have so often been told that great events
+cast their shadows before, that the tremendous
+truth of the phrase has ceased to impress us.
+The war which began in August, 1914, exercised
+a tremendous influence over the mind of the
+world in 1913, 1912, 1911, and 1910. The great
+wave of religious thought which swept over
+Europe and America during those years was
+caused by the approach of the war. The tremendous
+pacifist movement&mdash;not the weak, bloodless<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_290" id="Page_290">290</a></span>
+pacifism of the poltroon, but the heroic, flaming
+pacifism of the soldier-hearted convinced of sin&mdash;was
+a protest against the menacing injustice of
+the war; it was the world's shudder of dread.</p>
+
+<p>"The literature of the first decade of the
+twentieth century was more thoroughly and obviously
+influenced by the war than will be that
+of the decade following. Think of that amazing
+quickening of the conscience of the French nation,
+a quickening which found expression in the novels
+of Réné Bazin, the immortal ballads of Francis
+Jammes, and in the work of countless other
+writers! These people were preparing themselves
+and their fellow-countrymen for the mighty ordeal
+which was before them.</p>
+
+<p>"It is blasphemous to say that the war can
+only affect things that come after it; to say that
+is to attempt to limit the powers of God. There
+are, of course, some writers who can only feel the
+influence of a thing after it has become evident;
+after they have carefully studied and absorbed it.
+But there are others, the manikoi, the prophetic
+madmen, who are swayed by what is to happen
+rather than by what has happened. I'm one of
+them.</p>
+
+<p>"The war held me in its spell long before the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_291" id="Page_291">291</a></span>
+German troops crossed Belgian soil. I wrote my
+<i>The Terrible Meek</i> by direct inspiration from
+heaven in Holy Week, 1912.</p>
+
+<p>"I put that in," said Mr. Kennedy (who looks
+very much like Gilbert K. Chesterton's <i>Man-alive</i>),
+suddenly breaking off the thread of his
+discourse, "not only because I know that it is the
+absolute truth, but because of the highly entertaining
+way in which it is bound to be misinterpreted.</p>
+
+<p>"New York's dramatic critics, the Lord Chamberlain
+of England, the military authorities of
+Germany and Great Britain&mdash;all these people were
+charmingly unanimous in finding <i>The Terrible
+Meek</i> blasphemous, villainous, poisonous. Even
+the New York MacDowell Club, after two stormy
+debates, decided to omit all mention of <i>The Terrible
+Meek</i> from its bulletin. Perhaps this was
+not entirely because the play was 'sacrilegious';
+the club may possibly have been influenced by the
+fact that its author was a loud person with long
+hair, who told unpleasant truths in reputable
+gatherings. And copies of the published book of
+the play, which were accompanied by friendly letters
+from the author, were refused by every monarch
+now at war in Europe!<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_292" id="Page_292">292</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"But in 1914 and 1915 <i>The Terrible Meek</i> suddenly
+found, to its own amazement, that it had
+become a respectable play! Its connection with
+the present war became evident. It has been the
+subject of countless leading articles; it has been
+read, and even acted, in thousands of churches.
+On the occasion of the first production of the
+despised play in New York City, my wife and I
+received a small pot of roses from a girls' school
+which we sometimes visit. In due time this was
+planted by the porch of our summer home in
+Connecticut. This year&mdash;three years only after
+its planting&mdash;the rose-tree covers three-quarters
+of the big porch, and last summer it bore thousands
+of blooms. Now these things are a parable!</p>
+
+<p>"No, the Lord does not have to wait until the
+beginnings of mighty wars for them vitally to influence
+the literature of the world. Upon some
+of us He places the burden of the coming horror
+years before.</p>
+
+<p>"Although I am and always have been violently
+opposed to war, I cannot help observing what this
+war has already commenced to do for literature.
+It is killing Supermanism&mdash;and I purposely call
+it by that name to distinguish it from the mere
+actual doctrine that Nietzsche may or may not<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_293" id="Page_293">293</a></span>
+have taught. The damnable heresy, as it historically
+happened among us, was already beginning
+to influence very badly most of our young
+writers. Clever devilism caught the trick of it
+too easily. Now, heresy is sin always and everywhere;
+and this heresy was a particularly black
+and deadly kind of sin. It ate into the very heart
+of our life.</p>
+
+<p>"And yet there was a reason, almost an excuse,
+for the power which the Superman idea got over
+the minds of writers after Bernard Shaw's first
+brilliant and engaging popularization of it. And
+the excuse is that Supermanism, with its emphasis
+on strength and courage and life, was to a great
+extent a healthy and almost inevitable reaction
+from the maudlin milk-and-water sort of theology
+and morals that had been apologetically
+handed out to us by weak-kneed religious teachers.</p>
+
+<p>"We had too much of the 'gentle Jesus' of the
+Sunday-school. In our maze of evil Protestantisms,
+we had lost sight of the real Son of God
+who is Jesus Christ. We had lost the terrible and
+lovely doctrine of the wrath of the Lamb.</p>
+
+<p>"And so a great many writers turned to Supermanism
+with a shout of relief. They were sick
+of milk and water, and this seemed to be strong<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_294" id="Page_294">294</a></span>
+wine. But Supermanism is heresy, and it rapidly
+spread over the world, most perniciously influencing
+all intellectual life.</p>
+
+<p>"And there were so many things to help Supermanism!
+There was the general acceptance of
+the doctrine of biological necessity as an argument
+for war&mdash;Bernhardi actually used that
+phrase, I believe&mdash;the idea that affairs of the
+spirit are determined exteriorly. There was the
+acceptance of various extraordinary interpretations
+of Darwin's theory of evolution! Every little
+man called himself a scientist, and took his own
+little potterings-about very seriously. Everything
+had to be a matter of observation, these little
+fellows said; they would believe only what they
+saw. They didn't know that real scientists always
+begin <i>a priori</i>, that real scientists always
+know the truth first and then set about to prove it.</p>
+
+<p>"Well, all these people helped the heresy of
+Supermanism along. But the people who helped
+it along chiefly were the apologetic Christians,
+who should have combated it with fire and sword.
+It was helped along by the sort of Christian who
+calls himself 'liberal' and 'progressive,' the sort
+of Christian who says, 'Of course, I'm not orthodox.'
+When any one says that to me, I always answer<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_295" id="Page_295">295</a></span>
+him in the chaste little way which so endears me
+to my day and generation: 'Hell, aren't you? I
+hope I am!'</p>
+
+<p>"This sort of so-called Christian helps Supermanism
+in two ways. In the first place, the
+'progressive' Christians are great connoisseurs of
+heresy, they simply love any new sort of blasphemous
+philosophy, whether it comes from Germany
+or Upper Tooting. They love to try to
+assimilate all the new mad and wicked ideas, and
+graft them on Christianity. I suppose it's their
+idea of making the Lord Jesus Christ up to date
+and attractive. They love to try to engrave
+pretty patterns on the Rock of Ages. And
+Supermanism was to them a new and alluring
+pattern.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course a Supermanism might be worked
+out on strictly Christian lines, the Superman in
+that case being the Christ. But that is not the
+way in which the theory has historically worked
+out. No! Mr. Superman as we've actually
+known him in the world recently is the Beast that
+was taken, and with him the false prophets that
+wrought miracles before him, with which he had
+deceived them that had received the mark of the
+Beast and them that had worshiped his image.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_296" id="Page_296">296</a></span>
+And these, in the terrible symbolism of St. John,
+you will remember, got fire and brimstone for
+their pains! As now!</p>
+
+<p>"Then there was your Christian Supermanism
+that tried to get up a weak little imitation of the
+wrath of the Lamb. This was your bastard by
+theatricality and popularity out of so-called muscular
+Christianity. Not the virile 'muscular
+Christianity' of Charles Kingsley, mind you&mdash;a
+power he won almost alone, by blood and tears;
+but the 'safe' thing of the after generation, the
+'all things to all men'&mdash;when success was well assured.
+This is your baseball Christianity, the
+Christianity of the 'punch,' of the piled-up heap
+of dollars, of the commercially counted 'conversions'
+and the rest of the blasphemies! Christ
+deliver us from it, if needs be, even by fire!</p>
+
+<p>"Well, Supermanism cast its shadow over all
+forms of literary expression. The big and the little
+mockers all fell under its spell&mdash;they had their
+fling at Christianity in their novels, their plays,
+their poems. In the novel Supermanism was evident
+not so much in direct attacks on Christianity
+as in a brutal and pitiless realism. Perhaps some
+of this hard realism was a natural reaction from
+the eye-piping sentimentality of some of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_297" id="Page_297">297</a></span>
+Victorian writers. But most of it was merely
+Supermanism in fiction&mdash;pessimism, egotism, fatalism,
+cruelty.</p>
+
+<p>"One thing to be said for the Christian Scientists,
+the Mental Healers, the New Thought people
+generally, is that they did a real service through
+all this bad time by refusing to recognize any
+such heresy as biological determination as applied
+to things spiritual. They really did teach man's
+freedom up there in the heavens where he properly
+belongs. They refused to be bound by the earth,
+and all the appearances and the exterior causes
+thereof. Their Superman, if they ever used the
+phrase, was at least the Healer, the spirit spent
+for others, not for self.</p>
+
+<p>"If you were to ask me what were the war's
+most conspicuous effects on literature just at
+present, I would say conviction of sin, repentance
+and turning to God. There can be no suggestion
+of Supermanism in our literature now. We have
+rediscovered the Christian Virtues. If a man
+writes something about blond-beasting through
+the world for his own good, all we have to do is
+to stick up in front of his eyes a crucifix. For
+the world has seen courage and self-abnegation
+of the kind that Christ taught&mdash;it has seen men<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_298" id="Page_298">298</a></span>
+throw their lives away. The war has shown the
+world that the man who will throw away his life
+is braver and stronger and greater than the man
+who plunges forward to safety over the lives of
+others. The world has learned that he who loses
+his life shall gain it.</p>
+
+<p>"The war has thrown a clear light upon Christianity,
+and now all the little apologetic 'progressive'
+Christians see that the world had never
+reacted against orthodox Christianity as such, but
+only against the bowelless unbelief which masqueraded
+as Christianity. We have had so many
+ministers who talked about Christ as they would
+have talked about kippered herrings&mdash;even with
+less enthusiasm. But now any one who speaks
+or writes about Christianity after this will have
+to know that he has to do with something terribly
+real.</p>
+
+<p>"Of course, during the war the only people who
+can write about it are those who are in the red-hot
+period of youth. Young men of genius write
+in times of stress. The war forces genius to
+flower prematurely&mdash;that is how we got the noble
+sonnets of Rupert Brooke.</p>
+
+<p>"And after the war will come to the making of
+literature the man who has conquered pain and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_299" id="Page_299">299</a></span>
+agony. And that is the real Superman, the
+Christian Superman, the Superman who has always
+been the normal ideal of the world. Carlyle's
+Superman was nearer the truth than was Nietzsche's,
+for Carlyle's Superman idea was grounded
+in courage and sacrifice and love; his Superman
+was some one worth fighting for and dying for.
+And the war is showing us that this is the true
+Superman, if we want to save the world for
+nobler ends.</p>
+
+<p>"And the war, I believe, will do away with the
+tommy-rotten objection to 'message' in literature.
+Don't misunderstand me. Of course, we all object
+to the stupid 'story with a purpose' in the
+Sunday-school sense of that phrase. We don't
+want literature used as a sugar-coating around the
+illuminating lesson that God loves little Willie
+because he fed the dicky-birds and didn't say
+'damn'! Yet we want literature to awake again
+and be as always in the great days&mdash;a message.
+Literature must be a direct message from the heart
+of the author to the heart of the world. The
+<i>Prometheus Vinctus</i> was such a message. So also
+the <i>Antigone</i>. All Greek drama was.</p>
+
+<p>"All the little literary and artistic cults are
+dead or dying. The idea of literature as a thing<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_300" id="Page_300">300</a></span>
+distinct from life is dead. Writers can never again
+think of themselves as a race separate from the
+rest of humanity. All the artificial Bohemias
+have been destroyed, and can never again exist;
+for now at last the new world is about to dawn.
+Christ is coming.</p>
+
+<p>"And yet this war has made evident the importance
+of literature. It has made words real
+again. It has shown that men cannot live forever
+on a lie, written or spoken. God has come
+upon us like a thief in the night, and He has
+judged by our words. Some of us He has turned
+to madness and the vain babblings of heathendom.
+I am no wild chauvinist; though a man,
+English-born, it gives me no joy to speak of Germans
+as Huns, and to heap up hate and indignation
+against them. Nor in my wildest flights of
+romanticism can I dream that an England yet
+possessing Lord Northcliffe and the present
+Government can be all that God might call delightful.
+Mr. Superman has invaded England
+right enough, that I sadly know; and Prussianism
+is not all in Potsdam.</p>
+
+<p>"Yet it is significant, in view of the Superman's
+birthplace, in view of the fact that the German
+people have very largely accepted his doctrine<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_301" id="Page_301">301</a></span>
+and ideal, that the men who stand for speech
+among them, in their public manifestoes have been
+delivered over unto confusion and a lie. The
+logician has been illogical, the literary artist rendered
+without form and void. Their very craft
+has turned to impotence and self-destruction. I
+repeat, this is no happiness to me. Rather, I
+think of the Germany I have loved, and I weep
+for the pity of it all. I am no friend of kings and
+kaisers and bankers and grocers and titled newspaper
+editors, that I should make their bloodiness
+mine. But I cannot help but see the sign of God
+written across the heavens in words of living fire.</p>
+
+<p>"As I said in <i>The Terrible Meek</i>: 'There is
+great power in words. All the things that ever
+get done in the world, good or bad, are done by
+words.'</p>
+
+<p>"What we'll have to rediscover is that literature,
+like life, begins with the utterance of a
+word. And until people realize once again that
+a word is no mere dead thing buried in a dictionary,
+but the actual, awful, wonderful Life of God
+Himself, we shall neither have nor deserve to
+have a literature!"</p>
+
+
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_304" id="Page_304">304</a></span></p>
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_305" id="Page_305">305</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<h2><i>THE MASQUE AND DEMOCRACY</i></h2>
+
+<h4>PERCY MACKAYE</h4>
+
+<p>The community masque, <i>Caliban by the Yellow
+Sands</i>, is primarily intended to honor
+the memory of Shakespeare on the three-hundredth
+anniversary of his death. But its significance
+goes further than the purpose of commemoration.
+Mr. Percy MacKaye, the author,
+tells me that he sees his masque as part of a
+movement which shall bring poetry to the service
+of the entire community, which shall make poetry
+democratic, in the best sense of the word, and
+that the result of this movement will be to create
+conditions likely to produce out of the soil of
+America a great renascence of the drama.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. MacKaye undoubtedly is the busiest poet
+in the United States of America. When he
+talked to me about the significance of the community
+masque, rehearsals of the various groups
+that are to take part in it were going on all over<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_306" id="Page_306">306</a></span>
+the city. Every few minutes he was called away
+to confer with some of the directors of the masque,
+or some of the actors taking part in it. For a
+while Mr. John Drew was with us, talking of his
+appearance, in the character of Shakespeare, in
+epilogue. Mr. Robert Edmund Jones, the designer
+of the inner scenes, brought over some new
+drawings, and there were telephone conversations
+about music and costumes and other important
+details of the monster production.</p>
+
+<p>"The fact," said Mr. MacKaye, "that the
+masque is a poem primarily intended to be heard
+rather than to be read, is itself a movement toward
+the earlier and more democratic uses of poetry.
+Poetry appeals essentially to the ear, and
+is an art of the spoken word, yet, on account of
+our conditions of life, the written word is considered
+poetry.</p>
+
+<p>"This was not true in Shakespeare's time. And
+in the sort of work that I am doing is shown a
+return to the old ideal. A masque is a poem that
+can be visualized and acted. First of all it must
+be a poem, otherwise it cannot be anything but
+a more or less warped work of art.</p>
+
+<p>"With much of the new movement in the theater
+I am heartily in sympathy; but the movement<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_307" id="Page_307">307</a></span>
+seems to me one-sided. A large part of it has to
+do with visualization. Emphasis is laid on the
+appeal to the eye rather than the appeal to the
+ear, because the men of genius, like Gordon Craig,
+who have been leaders in the movement, have been
+interested in that phase of dramatic presentation.</p>
+
+<p>"Now I think that this one-sidedness is regrettable.
+When Gordon Craig called his book
+on dramatic visualization <i>The Art of the Theater</i>
+he was wrong. He should have called it 'An Art
+of the Theater.'</p>
+
+<p>"These men have neglected part of the human
+soul. They have forgotten that the greatest part
+of the appeal of a drama is to the ear. The ear
+brings up the most subtle of all life's associations
+and connotations. By means of the ear the motions
+and ideas are conjured up in the mind of
+the audience.</p>
+
+<p>"Now, while the new movement in the theater
+is visual in character, the new movement in poetry
+is, so to speak, audible. The American poets are
+insisting more and more on the importance of the
+spoken word in poetry, as distinct from its shadow
+on the printed page. Whether they write <i>vers
+libre</i> or the usual rhymed forms, they appreciate
+the fact that they must write poems that will<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_308" id="Page_308">308</a></span>
+be effective when read aloud. Surely this is a
+wholesome movement, likely to tend more and
+more toward definite dramatic expression on the
+part of the poets, whether to audiences through
+actors on the stage, or to audiences gathered to
+hear the direct utterances of the poets themselves.</p>
+
+<p>"This being so, the stage tending more toward
+visualization, and poetry tending more and
+more toward the spoken word, where shall we
+look for the co-ordinating development? I think
+that we shall find it in the community masque.
+The community masque draws out of the unlabored
+and untrammeled resources of our national
+life its inspiration and its theme. It requires our
+young poets to get closely in touch with our
+national life, with our history and with contemporary
+attitudes and ideals. To do this it is first
+of all necessary to have the poetic vision. The
+great need of the day is of the poet trained in the
+art of the theater.</p>
+
+<p>"The pageant and the masque offer the ideal
+conditions for the rendering of poetry. The poet
+who writes the lyric may or may not ordinarily
+be the one to speak it. In the masque the one
+who speaks the poem is the one chosen to do so
+because of his special fitness for the task. I have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_309" id="Page_309">309</a></span>
+chosen my actors for the Shakespeare masque with
+special reference to their ability to speak poetry."</p>
+
+<p>"But what has this to do," I asked, "with
+making poetry more democratic?"</p>
+
+<p>"For one thing," Mr. MacKaye answered, "it
+gives the poet a larger audience. People who
+never read poetry will listen to poetry when it is
+presented to them in dramatic form. I have
+found that the result of the presentation of a
+community masque is to interest in poetry a large
+number of people who had hitherto been deaf to
+its appeal. In St. Louis, when I started a masque,
+that queer word with a 'q' in it was understood by
+a comparatively small number. But after the
+masque was produced nearly every high-school
+boy and girl in the town was writing masques.</p>
+
+<p>"No one can observe the progress of the community
+masque without seeing that it is surely
+a most democratic art form. I read my St. Louis
+masque before assemblies of ministers, in negro
+high schools, before clubs of advertising-men, at
+I. W. W. meetings&mdash;before men of all conditions
+of life and shades of opinion. It afforded them
+a sort of spiritual and intellectual meeting-place, it
+gave them a common interest. Surely that is a
+democratic function.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_310" id="Page_310">310</a></span></p>
+
+<p>"The democracy of the masque was forcefully
+brought to my attention again at the recent dinner
+by Otto Kahn to the Mayor's Honorary Committee
+for the New York Shakespeare Celebration.
+After James M. Beck had made a speech,
+Morris Hillquit, also a member of the committee,
+arose and addressed the company. He pointed
+out more clearly than I have heard it done before
+that in this cause extremes of opinion met, that
+art was producing practical democracy.</p>
+
+<p>"And yet," said Mr. MacKaye, hastily, "the
+masque stands for the democracy of excellence,
+not the democracy of mediocrity. What is art
+but self-government, the harmonizing of the elements
+of the mind? There can be no art where
+there is no discipline, there can be no art where
+there is not a high standard of excellence.</p>
+
+<p>"As I said," he continued, "the original appeal
+of poetry was to the ear as well as to the eye. In
+the days when poetry was a more democratic art
+than it has been in our time and that of our
+fathers, the poet spoke his poems to a circle of
+enthralled listeners. The masque is spoken
+through many mouths, but it might be spoken or
+chanted by the bard himself.</p>
+
+<p>"There has never before been so great an opportunity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_311" id="Page_311">311</a></span>
+for the revival of the poetic drama.
+Ordinarily when a poetic drama is presented the
+cast has been drawn from actors trained in the
+rendition of prose. Inevitably the tendency has
+been for them to give a prose value to the lines
+of poetry. In selecting a cast for a masque,
+special attention is given to the ability of the
+actors to speak poetry, so the poem is presented
+as the poet intended.</p>
+
+<p>"It may be that the pageant and masque movement
+represents the full flowering of the renascence
+of poetry which all observers of intellectual
+events have recognized. But these movements
+are perennial; I do not like to think of a renascence
+of poetry because I do not think that poetry
+has been dead. I feel that it is desirable for the
+poets to become aware of the opportunities presented
+to them by the masque, the opportunities
+to combine the art of poetry with the art of the
+theater, and thus put poetry at the service of
+mankind.</p>
+
+<p>"I have felt that the Poetry Society of America,
+an organization whose activities certainly are
+stimulating and encouraging to every friend of
+the art, might serve poetry better if its members
+were to place more emphasis on creation and less<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_312" id="Page_312">312</a></span>
+on criticism. At their meetings now criticism is
+the dominant note. Poems written by the members
+are read aloud and criticized from the floor.
+This is excellent, in its place, but its effect is to
+lay stress on the critical function of the poet,
+which, after all, is not his main function. What
+the members of the Poetry Society should do is
+to seek co-operatively to create something. And
+for this the masque offers them a golden opportunity.</p>
+
+<p>"The flowering of poetry is a thing of infinite
+variety. There must be variety in a masque if
+the masque is to continue to be a worthy and
+popular art form. Standardization would be
+fatal to the masque, and I have stood out against
+it with all the power I possess. The masque and
+the pageant must not degenerate into traveling
+shows, done according to a fixed receipt. There
+must be the vision in it, and when the people see
+the vision they respond marvelously."</p>
+
+<p>Percy MacKaye is the son of Steele MacKaye,
+the author of <i>Hazel Kirke</i> and other popular
+plays. From the very beginning of his literary
+career his chief ambition has seemed to be to
+bring about a closer <i>rapprochement</i> between
+poetry and the drama.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_313" id="Page_313">313</a></span></p>
+
+<p>When Mr. MacKaye was graduated from Harvard,
+in 1897, there were in that university no
+courses, technical or otherwise, in the modern
+drama. The official acceptance of his own commencement
+part <i>On the Need of Imagination in
+the Drama of To-day</i> was the first official sanction
+of the subject, which was commented upon
+by the <i>Boston Transcript</i> as something unprecedented
+in the annals of university discussion, especially
+of Harvard. It was not until seven or
+eight years had passed that Prof. George P. Baker
+began his courses in dramatic technique.</p>
+
+<p>The development of the pageant and the masque
+has been for years the object of Mr. MacKaye's
+tireless endeavors. He has spoken of the masque
+as "the potential drama of democracy." Two
+years ago in St. Louis he had his first technical
+opportunity on a large scale to experiment in devising
+this sort of communal entertainment.
+There, during five performances, witnessed by
+half a million people, some seven thousand citizens
+of St. Louis took part in his masque, in association
+with the pageant by Thomas Wood
+Stevens.</p>
+
+<p>"The outgoing cost of the St. Louis production,"
+said Mr. MacKaye, "was $122,000; the income,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_314" id="Page_314">314</a></span>
+$139,000. The balance of $17,000 has been
+devoted to a fund for civic art. If these seem
+large sums, we must look back to the days of the
+classic Greek drama and remember that the cost
+of producing a single play by Sophocles at Athens
+was $500,000.</p>
+
+<p>"The St. Louis production was truly a drama
+of, for, and by the people, a true community
+masque. <i>Caliban by the Yellow Sands</i> is a community
+masque, given as the central popular
+expression of some hundreds of supplementary
+Shakespearian celebrations.</p>
+
+<p>"I call this work a masque, because it is a
+dramatic work of symbolism, involving in its
+structure pageantry, poetry, and the dance. But
+I have not thought to relate its structure to a
+historic form; I have simply sought by its structure
+to solve a problem of the art of the theater.
+That problem is the new one of creating a focus of
+dramatic technique for the growing but groping
+movement vaguely called 'pageantry,' which is
+itself a vital sign of social evolution&mdash;the half-desire
+of the people not merely to remain receptive
+to a popular art created by specialists, but
+to take part themselves in creating it; the desire,&mdash;that
+is, of democracy consistently to seek expression<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_315" id="Page_315">315</a></span>
+through a drama of and by the people,
+not merely for the people.</p>
+
+<p>"Six years ago, after the pageant-masque of
+the city of Gloucester, Massachusetts, I wrote, in
+<i>Scribner's Magazine</i>, an article in which I said that
+I found in the three American pageant-masques
+which I had seen recently, the Gloucester Pageant,
+the Masque at Aspet, and the California Redwood
+Festival, the expression of community spirit
+focused by co-operating artists in dramatic form.
+I said then, what I feel even more strongly after
+my work with the St. Louis Pageant and the
+Shakespearian Masque, that pageantry is poetry
+for the masses.</p>
+
+<p>"The parade of Election Day, the processions
+of Antics and Horribles on the Fourth of July
+and Thanksgiving Day, the May-Queen rituals of
+children&mdash;these make an elemental appeal to
+every one. What is this elemental appeal? Is it
+not the appeal of symbolism, the expression of
+life's meanings in sensuous form? Crude though
+it may be, pageantry satisfies an elemental instinct
+for art, a popular demand for poetry. This
+instinct and this demand, like other human instincts
+and demands, may be educated, refined,
+developed into a mighty agency of civilization.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_316" id="Page_316">316</a></span>
+Refinement of this deep, popular instinct will result
+from a rational selection in correlation of the
+elements of pageantry. Painting, dancing, music,
+and sculpture (the last as applied to classic
+groupings) are appropriately the special arts for
+selecting those elements, and drama is the special
+art of correlating them.</p>
+
+<p>"The form of pageantry most popular and impressive
+in appeal as a fine art is that of the
+dramatic pageant, or masque. It is not limited
+to historic themes. All vital modern forces and
+institutions of our nation might appropriately find
+symbolic expression in the masque.</p>
+
+<p>"And in this would be seen the making of art
+democratic. Thus would the art of poetry and
+the art of the drama be put at the service of mankind.
+Artistic gifts, which now are individualized
+and dispersed, would be organized to express the
+labors and aspirations of communities, reviving,
+for the noblest humanism of our own times, the
+traditions of Leonardo da Vinci, Ben Jonson, and
+Inigo Jones. The development of the art of
+public masques, dedicated to civic education,
+would do more than any other agency to provide
+popular symbolic form and tradition for the stuff
+of a noble national drama. The present theaters<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_317" id="Page_317">317</a></span>
+cannot develop a public art, since they are dedicated
+to a private speculative business. The association
+of artists and civic leaders in the organization
+of public masques would tend gradually
+to establish a civic theater, owned by the people
+and conducted by artists, in every city of the
+nation.</p>
+
+<p>"I expressed these ideas," said Mr. MacKaye,
+"some years ago, before the pageant movement
+had reached its present pitch of popularity. All
+my experiences since that time have given me a
+firmer conviction that the masque is the drama
+of democracy, and I believe that the chief value
+of the Shakespearian masque is as a step forward
+in the progress of the co-operative dramatic and
+poetic expression of the people.</p>
+
+<p>"<i>Caliban by the Yellow Sands</i> will be given at
+the City College Stadium May 23d, 24th, 25th,
+26th, and 27th. After its New York performance
+it will be available for production elsewhere on a
+modified scale of stage performance. After June
+1st it is planned that a professional company,
+which will co-operate with the local communities,
+will take the masque on tour.</p>
+
+<p>"The subtitle of <i>Caliban by the Yellow Sands</i> is
+<i>A Community Masque of the Art of the Theater</i>,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_318" id="Page_318">318</a></span>
+<i>Devised and Written to Commemorate the Tercentenary
+of the Death of Shakespeare</i>. The dramatic-symbolic
+motive of the masque I have taken from
+Scene 2 of Act I of <i>The Tempest</i>, where Prospero
+says:</p>
+
+<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
+<span class="i8">It was mine art<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">When I arrived and heard thee, that made gape<br /></span>
+<span class="i0">The pine and let thee out.<br /></span>
+</div></div>
+
+<p>"The art of Prospero I have conceived as the
+art of Shakespeare in its universal scope&mdash;that
+many-visioned art of the theater, which age after
+age has come to liberate the imprisoned imagination
+of mankind from the fetters of brute force and
+ignorance; that same art which, being usurped
+or stifled by groping part-knowledge, prudery, or
+lust, has been botched in its ideal aims, and has
+wrought havoc, hypocrisy, and decadence. Caliban
+is in this masque that passionate child-curious
+part of us all, groveling close to his origin, yet
+groping up toward that serener plane of pity and
+love, reason, and disciplined will, on which
+Miranda and Prospero commune with Ariel and
+his spirits.</p>
+
+<p>"The theme of the masque&mdash;Caliban seeking to
+learn the art of Prospero&mdash;is, of course, the slow
+education of mankind through the influences of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_319" id="Page_319">319</a></span>
+co-operative art&mdash;that is, of the art of the theater
+in its full social scope. This theme of co-operation
+is expressed earliest in the masque through
+the lyric of Ariel's Spirits taken from <i>The Tempest</i>;
+it is sounded, with central stress, in the
+chorus of peace when the kings clasp hands on
+the Field of the Cloth of Gold; and, with final
+emphasis, in the gathering together of the creative
+forces of dramatic art in the Epilogue.</p>
+
+<p>"So I have tried to make the masque bring
+that message of co-operation which I think all
+true art should bring. And the masque is the
+form which seems to me destined to bring about
+this desired co-operation, to bring back, perhaps,
+the conditions which existed in the spacious days
+of the great Greek drama. The growth in popularity
+of masques and pageants is preparing the
+way for a new race of poet dramatists, of poets
+who will use their knowledge of the art of the
+theater to interpret the people to themselves.
+And out of this new artistic democracy will come,
+let us hope, our new national poetry and our new
+national drama."</p>
+
+
+
+<p class="center">THE END
+</p>
+
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 95%;" />
+<h2>Transcriber's Notes</h2>
+
+<p>The duplicate book title and chapter titles have been removed. Also the
+following misprints have been corrected:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot">
+<p>TOC: put in "Tippecanoe" without a hyphen (in "Tippecanoe County,
+Indiana")</p>
+
+<p>TOC: "Mackaye" changed to "MacKaye", as in all other instances ("Percy
+Mackaye was born in New York City...")</p>
+
+<p>p. 56: "countinent" changed to "continent" ("Yet in their time these men
+set the whole countinent in a roar.")</p>
+
+<p>p. 75: period is added after the middle initial W (ROBERT W. CHAMBERS)</p>
+
+<p>p. 78: period is added the following sentence: The most imaginative and
+fantastic romances must have their basis in real life.</p>
+
+<p>p. 107: put in "dive-keeper" with a hyphen (no other instance in the
+text)</p>
+
+<p>p. 112: put in "soulless" without a hyphen (no other instances in the
+text)</p>
+
+<p>p. 178: opening double quote changed to single quote ('If ye had not
+plowed with my heifer....)</p>
+
+<p>p. 218: put in "catch-words" with a hyphen (no other instances in the
+text)</p>
+
+<p>p. 243: put in "motion-picture" with a hyphen (no other instances in the
+text)</p>
+
+<p>p. 247: put in "off-hand" with a hyphen ("I can think off-hand of quite
+a group of writers....")</p>
+
+<p>p. 283: put in "Dooryards" without a hyphen ("When Lilacs Last in
+Dooryards Bloomed")</p>
+
+<p>p. 293: put in "everywhere" without a hyphen ("heresy is sin always and
+everywhere;")</p>
+
+<p>p. 294: "Of couse" changed to "Of course" ("Of course, I'm not
+orthodox.")</p>
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Literature in the Making, by Various
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LITERATURE IN THE MAKING ***
+
+***** This file should be named 34313-h.htm or 34313-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/3/1/34313/
+
+Produced by Elizaveta Shevyakhova, Suzanne Shell and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
+(This file was produced from images generously made
+available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/34313-h/images/coverill.png b/34313-h/images/coverill.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6f49ece
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34313-h/images/coverill.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/34313-h/images/tp.png b/34313-h/images/tp.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..71d894f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34313-h/images/tp.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/34313.txt b/34313.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6a04b0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34313.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,6461 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Literature in the Making, by Various
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Literature in the Making
+ by some of its makers
+
+Author: Various
+
+Editor: Joyce Kilmer
+
+Release Date: November 13, 2010 [EBook #34313]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LITERATURE IN THE MAKING ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Elizaveta Shevyakhova, Suzanne Shell and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
+(This file was produced from images generously made
+available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ LITERATURE IN THE MAKING
+ BY
+ SOME OF ITS MAKERS
+
+ PRESENTED BY
+ JOYCE KILMER
+
+ [Illustration]
+
+ HARPER & BROTHERS
+ NEW YORK AND LONDON
+
+
+
+
+ Copyright, 1917, by Harper & Brothers
+ Printed in the United States of America
+ Published April, 1917
+
+
+
+
+ TO
+ LOUIS BEVIER, PH.D., LITT.D.
+ AND
+ LOUIS BEVIER, JR.
+
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+
+ PAGE
+
+_WAR STOPS LITERATURE_ 3
+
+ WILLIAM DEAN HOWELLS
+
+ William Dean Howells, the foremost American novelist of
+ his generation, was born at Martin's Ferry, Ohio, March
+ 11, 1837. Most of his many novels have been realistic
+ and sympathetic studies of contemporary American life.
+ For some years he has written "The Editor's Easy Chair"
+ in _Harper's Magazine_. He has received honorary
+ degrees from Harvard, Yale, Oxford, and Columbia, and
+ in 1915 the National Institute of Arts and Letters
+ awarded him its Gold Medal "For distinguished work in
+ fiction." _The Daughter of the Storage_ and _Years of
+ My Youth_ are his latest books.
+
+
+_THE JOYS OF THE POOR_ 19
+
+ KATHLEEN NORRIS
+
+ Kathleen Norris was born in San Francisco, California,
+ July 16, 1880. She is the wife of Charles Gilman
+ Norris, himself a writer and the brother of the late
+ Frank Norris. Among Mrs. Norris's best-known novels are
+ _Mother_, _The Story of Julia Page_, and _The Heart of
+ Rachel_.
+
+
+_NATIONAL PROSPERITY AND ART_ 35
+
+ BOOTH TARKINGTON
+
+ Booth Tarkington was born in Indianapolis, Indiana,
+ July 29, 1869. A prolific and brilliant writer, he has
+ scored many successes of different types, being the
+ author of the romantic drama _Monsieur Beaucaire_, and
+ of many novels dealing with contemporary Middle-Western
+ life. Recently he has, in _Seventeen_ and the "Penrod"
+ stories, given his attention to the comedies and
+ tragedies of American youth.
+
+
+_ROMANTICISM AND AMERICAN HUMOR_ 45
+
+ MONTAGUE GLASS
+
+ Montague Glass was born at Manchester, England, July
+ 23, 1877. Coming in his youth to the United States, he
+ brought into American fiction a new type--that of the
+ metropolitan Jewish-American business man. His _Potash
+ and Perlmutter_ and _Abe and Mawruss_ have given him a
+ European as well as an American reputation.
+
+
+_THE "MOVIES" BENEFIT LITERATURE_ 63
+
+ REX BEACH
+
+ Rex Beach was born at Atwood, Michigan, September 1,
+ 1877. His novels deal chiefly with the West and the
+ North, and his favorite theme is adventurous life in
+ the open. Among his best-known books are _The
+ Spoilers_, _The Silver Horde_, and _Rainbow's End_.
+
+
+_WHAT IS GENIUS?_ 75
+
+ ROBERT W. CHAMBERS
+
+ Robert W. Chambers was born in Brooklyn, New York, May
+ 26, 1865. One of the most widely read writers of his
+ time, he has given his attention chiefly to English and
+ American society, making it the theme of a large number
+ of novels, among which may be mentioned _The Fighting
+ Chance_, _Japonette_, and _Athalie_.
+
+
+_DETERIORATION OF THE SHORT STORY_ 89
+
+ JAMES LANE ALLEN
+
+ James Lane Allen was born near Lexington, Kentucky, in
+ 1849. In 1886 he gave up his profession of teaching to
+ devote his attention to literature. Many of his novels
+ deal with the South. Of them perhaps _The Kentucky
+ Cardinal_ and _The Choir Invisible_ are best known.
+
+
+_SOME HARMFUL INFLUENCES_ 101
+
+ HARRY LEON WILSON
+
+ Harry Leon Wilson was born in Oregon, Illinois, May 1,
+ 1867. He was co-author with Booth Tarkington of _The
+ Man from Home_, and his _Bunker Bean_ and _Ruggles of
+ Red Gap_ have given him a great reputation for
+ irresistible and peculiarly American humor.
+
+
+_THE PASSING OF THE SNOB_ 119
+
+ EDWARD S. MARTIN
+
+ Edward Sandford Martin was born in Willowbrook, Owasco,
+ New York, January 2, 1856. His keen yet sympathetic
+ observation of modern life finds expression in essays,
+ many of which have been used editorially in Life.
+ Several volumes of his essays have been published,
+ among which may be mentioned _The Luxury of Children,
+ and Some Other Luxuries_ and _Reflections of a
+ Beginning Husband_.
+
+
+_COMMERCIALIZING THE SEX INSTINCT_ 131
+
+ ROBERT HERRICK
+
+ Robert Herrick was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts,
+ April 26, 1868. He has been until recently a professor
+ at the University of Chicago. He is a critic and a
+ writer of realistic novels. _The Web of Life_, _The
+ Common Lot_, _Together_, and _Clark's Field_ are novels
+ that show Mr. Herrick's questioning attitude toward
+ some modern social institutions.
+
+
+_SIXTEEN DON'TS FOR POETS_ 145
+
+ ARTHUR GUITERMAN
+
+ Arthur Guiterman was born of American parents in
+ Vienna, Austria, November 28, 1871. He is a writer of
+ deft and humorous light verse, of which a volume was
+ recently published under the title _The Laughing Muse_.
+ He contributes a weekly rhymed review to _Life_.
+
+
+_MAGAZINES CHEAPEN FICTION_ 157
+
+ GEORGE BARR McCUTCHEON
+
+ George Barr McCutcheon was born on a farm in Tippecanoe
+ County, Indiana, July 26, 1866. He is a short-story
+ writer and novelist, devoting himself chiefly to tales
+ of adventure. _Beverley of Graustark_ and the volumes
+ that succeeded it have gained him many admirers among
+ lovers of romance.
+
+
+_BUSINESS INCOMPATIBLE WITH ART_ 169
+
+ FRANK H. SPEARMAN
+
+ Frank H. Spearman was born at Buffalo, New York,
+ September 6, 1859. He is known both as a short-story
+ writer and a writer of articles on economic topics. His
+ novels are founded chiefly on themes dealing with the
+ great industrial enterprises of the West, especially
+ the railroads. The best known of these are _The
+ Daughter of a Magnate_ and _The Strategy of Great
+ Railroads_.
+
+
+_THE NOVEL MUST GO_ 187
+
+ WILL N. HARBEN
+
+ Will N. Harben, who was born in Dalton, Georgia, July
+ 5, 1858, began his career in business in the South. His
+ entrance into literature began with the assistant
+ editorship of the _Youth's Companion_. He had gained a
+ distinctive place as an interpreter of phases of
+ Southern life in the company which includes Cable,
+ Harris, and Johnston. His novels include _Pole Baker_,
+ _Ann Boyd_, _Second Choice_, and many others.
+
+
+_LITERATURE IN THE COLLEGES_ 199
+
+ JOHN ERSKINE
+
+ John Erskine was born in New York City, October 5,
+ 1879. He is Adjunct Professor of English at Columbia
+ University, the author of many text-books and critical
+ works, of _Actaeon and Other Poems_ and of _The Moral
+ Obligation to be Intelligent and Other Essays_.
+
+
+_CITY LIFE VERSUS LITERATURE_ 213
+
+ JOHN BURROUGHS
+
+ John Burroughs was born in Roxbury, New York, April 3,
+ 1837. He taught school in his early years, and held for
+ a time a clerkship in the United States Treasury. Since
+ 1874 he has devoted himself to literature and fruit
+ culture. Among his well-known "Nature" books may be
+ noted _Wake Robin_, _Bird and Bough_, and _Camping and
+ Tramping with Roosevelt_.
+
+
+_"EVASIVE IDEALISM" IN LITERATURE_ 229
+
+ ELLEN GLASGOW
+
+ Ellen Glasgow was born in Richmond, Virginia, April 22,
+ 1874. Her novels, among which may be mentioned _The
+ Voice of the People_, _The Romance of a Plain Man_, and
+ _Life and Gabriella_, deal chiefly with social and
+ psychological problems, and their scenes are for the
+ most part in the southern part of the United States.
+
+
+_"CHOCOLATE FUDGE" IN THE MAGAZINE_ 241
+
+ FANNIE HURST
+
+ Fannie Hurst was born in St. Louis, October 19, 1889.
+ She has served as a saleswoman and as a waitress and
+ crossed the Atlantic in the steerage to get material
+ for her short stories of the life of the working-woman,
+ selections of which have been published with the titles
+ _Just Around the Corner_ and _Every Soul Hath Its
+ Song_.
+
+
+_THE NEW SPIRIT IN POETRY_ 253
+
+ AMY LOWELL
+
+ Amy Lowell was born in Brookline, Massachusetts,
+ February 9, 1874. She is prominently identified with
+ _vers libre_, _imagisme_, and other ultra-modern poetic
+ tendencies. She has published a volume of essays on
+ modern French poetry and three books of poems, of
+ which _Men, Women, and Ghosts_ is the most recent.
+
+
+_A NEW DEFINITION OF POETRY_ 265
+
+ EDWIN ARLINGTON ROBINSON
+
+ Edwin Arlington Robinson was born in Head Tide, Maine,
+ December 22, 1869. He has written plays, but is chiefly
+ known for his poems, most of them studies of character.
+ His most recent volume is _Merlin: A Poem_.
+
+
+_LET POETRY BE FREE_ 277
+
+ JOSEPHINE PRESTON PEABODY
+
+ Josephine Preston Peabody was born in New York City.
+ She won the Stratford-on-Avon Prize for her poetic
+ drama _The Piper_. She has published many books of
+ verse, one of which, called _Harvest Moon_, deals
+ chiefly with woman's tragic share in the Great War. She
+ is the wife of Prof. Lionel Simeon Marks of Harvard.
+
+
+_THE HERESY OF SUPERMANISM_ 289
+
+ CHARLES RANN KENNEDY
+
+ Charles Rann Kennedy was born at Derby, England,
+ February 14, 1871. His plays, dealing with social and
+ religious questions, include _The Servant in the
+ House_, _The Terrible Meek_, _The Idol-Breakers_, and
+ _The Rib of the Man_, his latest work.
+
+
+_THE MASQUE AND DEMOCRACY_ 305
+
+ PERCY MACKAYE
+
+ Percy MacKaye was born in New York City, March 16,
+ 1875. He has written many poems and plays, and has been
+ especially identified with the production of community
+ pageants and masques, having written and directed the
+ St. Louis Civic Masque in 1914, and the Shakespeare
+ Masque in New York City in 1916. Among his published
+ works may be mentioned _The Scarecrow_, _Jeanne d'Arc_,
+ _Sappho and Phaon_ and _Anti-Matrimony_ (plays) and
+ _Uriel and Other Poems_.
+
+
+
+
+INTRODUCTION
+
+
+This book is an effort to bridge the gulf between literary theory and
+literary practice. In these days of specialization it is more than ever
+true that the man who lectures and writes about the craft of writing
+seldom has the time or the inclination to show, by actual work, that he
+can apply his principles. On the other hand, the successful novelist,
+poet, or playwright devotes himself to his craft and seldom attempts to
+analyze and display the methods by which he obtains his effect, or even
+to state his opinion on matters intellectual and aesthetic.
+
+Now, the professor of English and the literary critic are valuable
+members of society, and the development of literature owes much to their
+counsel and guardianship. But there is a special significance in the
+opinion which the writer holds concerning his own trade, in the advice
+which he bases upon his own experience, in the theory of life and art
+which he has formulated for himself.
+
+Therefore I have spent considerable time in talking with some of the
+most widely read authors of our day, and in obtaining from them frank
+and informal statements of their points of view. I have purposely
+refrained from confining myself to writers of any one school or type of
+mind--the dean of American letters and the most advanced of our newest
+poetical anarchists alike are represented in these pages. The authors
+have talked freely, realizing that this was an opportunity to set forth
+their views definitely and comprehensively. They have not the time to
+write or lecture about their art, but they are willing to talk about it.
+
+They knew that through me they spoke, in the first place, to the great
+army of readers of their books who have a natural and pleasing curiosity
+concerning the personality of the men and women who devote their lives
+to providing them with entertainment, and, in some cases, instruction.
+They knew that through me they spoke, in the second place, to all the
+literary apprentices of the country, who look eagerly for precept and
+example to those who have won fame by the delightful labor of writing.
+They knew that through me they spoke, in the third place, to critics and
+students of literature of our own generation and, perhaps, of those that
+shall come after us. How eagerly would we read, for instance, an
+interview with Francis Bacon on the question of the authorship of
+Shakespeare's plays, or an interview with Oliver Goldsmith in which he
+gave his real opinion of Dr. Johnson, Garrick, and Boswell! A century or
+so from now, some of the writers who in this book talk to the world may
+be the objects of curiosity as great.
+
+The writers who have talked with me received me with courtesy, gave me
+freely of their time and thought, and showed a sincere desire for the
+furtherance of the purpose of this book. To them, accordingly, I tender
+my gratitude for anything in these pages which the reader may find of
+interest or of value. Their explanations of their literary creeds and
+practices were furnished in the first instance for the _New York Times_,
+to which I desire to express my acknowledgments.
+
+ JOYCE KILMER.
+
+
+
+
+LITERATURE IN THE MAKING
+
+
+
+
+_WAR STOPS LITERATURE_
+
+WILLIAM DEAN HOWELLS
+
+
+War stops literature. This is the belief of a man who for more than a
+quarter of a century has been in the front rank of the world's
+novelists, who wrote _The Rise of Silas Lapham_ and _A Modern Instance_
+and nearly a hundred other sympathetic interpretations of American life.
+
+Mr. William Dean Howells was the third writer to whom was put the
+question, "What effect will the Great War have on literature?" And he
+was the first to give a direct answer.
+
+A famous French dramatist replied: "I am not a prophet. I have enough to
+do to understand the present and the past; I cannot concern myself with
+the future." A famous English short-story writer said, "The war has
+already inspired some splendid poetry; it may also inspire great plays
+and novels, but, of course, we cannot tell as yet."
+
+But Mr. Howells said, quite simply, "War stops literature." He said it
+as unemotionally as if he were stating a familiar axiom.
+
+He does not consider it an axiom, however, for he supplied proof.
+
+"I have never believed," he said, "that great events produced great
+literature. They seldom call forth the great creative powers of man. In
+poetry it is not the poems of occasion that endure, but the poems that
+have come into being independently, not as the result of momentous
+happenings.
+
+"This war does not furnish the poet, the novelist, and the dramatist
+with the material of literature. For instance, the Germans, as every one
+will admit, have shown extraordinary valor. But we do not think of
+celebrating that valor in poetry; it does not thrill the modern writers
+as such valor thrilled the writers of bygone centuries. When we think of
+the valor of the Germans, our emotion is not admiration but pity.
+
+"And the reason for this is that fighting is no longer our ideal.
+Fighting was not a great ideal, and therefore it is no longer our ideal.
+All that old material of literature--the clashing of swords, the thunder
+of shot and shell, the great clouds of smoke, the blood and fury--all
+this has gone out from literature. It is an anachronism."
+
+"But the American Civil War produced literature, did it not?" I asked.
+
+"What great literature did it produce?" asked Mr. Howells in turn. "As I
+look back over my life and recall to mind the great number of books that
+the Civil War inspired I find that I am thinking of things that the
+American people have forgotten. They did not become literature, these
+poems and stories that came in such quantities and seemed so important
+in the sixties.
+
+"There were the novels of J. W. De Forest, for instance. They were well
+written, they were interesting, they described some phases of the Civil
+War truthfully and vividly. We read them when they were written--but you
+probably have never heard of them. No one reads them now. They were
+literature, but that about which they were written has ceased to be of
+literary interest.
+
+"Of course, the Civil War, because of its peculiar nature, was followed
+by an expansion, intellectual as well as social and economic. And this
+expansion undoubtedly had its beneficial effect on literature. But the
+Civil War itself did not have, could not have, literary expression.
+
+"Of all the writings which the Civil War directly inspired I can think
+of only one that has endured to be called literature. That is Lowell's
+'Commemoration Ode.'
+
+"War stops literature. It is an upheaval of civilization, a return to
+barbarism; it means death to all the arts. Even the preparation for war
+stops literature. It stopped it in Germany years ago. A little anecdote
+is significant.
+
+"I was in Florence about 1883, long after the Franco-Prussian War, and
+there I met the editor of a great German literary weekly--I will not
+tell you its name or his. He was a man of refinement and education, and
+I have not forgotten his great kindness to my own fiction. One day I
+asked him about the German novelists of the day.
+
+"He said: 'There are no longer any German novelists worthy of the name.
+Our new ideal has stopped all that. Militarism is our new ideal--the
+ideal of Duty--and it has killed our imagination. So the German novel is
+dead.'"
+
+"Why is it, then," I asked, "that Russia, a nation of militaristic
+ideals, has produced so many great novels during the past century?"
+
+"Russia is not Germany," answered the man who taught Americans to read
+Turgenieff. "The people of Russia are not militaristic as the people of
+Germany are militaristic. In Germany war has for a generation been the
+chief idea of every one. The nation has had a militaristic obsession.
+And this, naturally, has stifled the imagination.
+
+"But in Russia nothing of the sort has happened. Whatever the designs of
+the ruling classes may be, the people of Russia keep their simplicity,
+their large intellectuality and spirituality. And, therefore, their
+imagination and other great intellectual and spiritual gifts find
+expression in their great novels and plays.
+
+"I well remember how the Russian novelists impressed me when I was a
+young man. They opened to me what seemed to be a new world--and it was
+only the real world. There is Tcheckoff--have you read his _Orchard_?
+What life, what color, what beauty of truth are in that book!
+
+"Then there is Turgenieff--how grateful I am for his books! It must be
+thirty years since I first read him. Thomas Sargent Perry, of Boston, a
+man of the greatest culture, was almost the first American to read
+Turgenieff. Stedman read Turgenieff in those days, too. Soon all of the
+younger writers were reading him.
+
+"I remember very well a dinner at Whitelaw Reid's house in Lexington
+Avenue, when some of us young men were enthusiastic over the Russian
+novel, and the author we mentioned most frequently was Turgenieff.
+
+"Dr. J. G. Holland, the poet who edited _The Century_, lived across the
+street from Mr. Reid, and during the evening he came over and joined us.
+He listened to us for a long time in silence, hardly speaking a word.
+When he rose to go, he said: 'I have been listening to the conversation
+of these young men for over an hour. They have been talking about books.
+And I have never before heard the names of any of the authors they have
+mentioned.'"
+
+"Were those the days," I asked, "in which you first read Tolstoy?"
+
+"That was long before the time," answered Mr. Howells. "Tolstoy
+afterward meant everything to me--his philosophy as well as his
+art--far more than Turgenieff. Tolstoy did not love all his writing.
+He loved the thing that he wrote about, the thing that he lived and
+taught--equality. And equality is the best thing in the world. It
+is the thing for which the Best of Men lived and died.
+
+"I never met Tolstoy," said Mr. Howells. "But I once sent him a message
+of appreciation after he had sent a message to me. Tolstoy was great in
+the way he wrote as well as in what he wrote. Tolstoy's force is a moral
+force. His great art is as simple as nature."
+
+"Do you think that the Russian novelists have influenced your work?" I
+asked.
+
+"I think," Mr. Howells replied, "that I had determined what I was to do
+before I read any Russian novels. I first thought that it was necessary
+to write only about things that I knew had already been written about.
+Certain things had already been in books; therefore, I thought, they
+legitimately were literary subjects and I might write about them.
+
+"But soon I knew that this idea was wrong, that I must get my material,
+not out of books, but out of life. And I also knew that it was not
+necessary for me to look at life through English spectacles. Most of our
+writers had been looking at life through English spectacles; they had
+been closely following in the footsteps of English novelists. I saw
+that around me were the materials for my work. I saw around me
+life--wholesome, natural, human.
+
+"I saw a young, free, energetic society. I saw a society in which
+love--the greatest and most beautiful thing in the world--was innocent;
+a society in which the relation between man and woman was simple and
+pure. Here, I thought, are the materials for novels. Why should I go
+back to the people of bygone ages and of lands not my own?"
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that romanticism has lost its hold on the
+novelists?"
+
+Mr. Howells smiled. "When realism," he said, "is once in a novelist's
+blood he never can degenerate into romanticism. Romanticism is no longer
+a literary force among English-speaking authors. Romanticism belongs to
+the days in which war was an aim, an ideal, instead of a tragic
+accident. It is something foreign to us. And literature must be native
+to the soil, affected, of course, by the culture of other lands and
+ages, but essentially of the people of the land and time in which it is
+produced. Realism is the material of democracy. And no great literature
+or art can arise outside of the democracy."
+
+Tolstoy was mentioned again, and Mr. Howells was asked if he did not
+think that the Russian novelist's custom of devoting a part of every day
+to work that was not literary showed that all writers would be better
+off if they were obliged to make a living in some other way than by
+writing. Mr. Howells gave his answer with considerable vigor. His calm,
+blue eyes lost something of their kindliness, and his lips were
+compressed into a straight, thin line before he said:
+
+"I certainly do not think so. The artist in letters or in lines should
+have leisure in which to perform his valuable service to society. The
+history of literature is full of heartbreaking instances of writers
+whose productive careers were retarded by their inability to earn a
+living at their chosen profession. The belief that poverty helps a
+writer is stupid and wrong. Necessity is not and never has been an
+incentive. Poverty is not and never has been an incentive. Writers and
+other creative artists are hindered, not helped, by lack of leisure.
+
+"I remember my own early experiences, and I know that my writing
+suffered very much because I could not devote all my time to it. I had
+to spend ten hours in drudgery for every two that I spent on my real
+work. The fact that authors who have given the world things that it
+treasures are forced to live in a state of anxiety over their finances
+is lamentable. This anxiety cannot but have a restrictive influence on
+literature. It is not want, but the fear of want, that kills."
+
+"Still, in spite of their precarious financial condition, modern authors
+are doing good work, are they not?" I asked.
+
+"Certainly they are," answered Mr. Howells, "the novelists especially.
+There is Robert Herrick, for example. His novels are interesting
+stories, and they also are faithful reflections of American life. Will
+Harben's work is admirable. It has splendid realism and fine humor.
+Perhaps one thing that has kept it, so far, from an appreciation so
+general as it will one day receive, is the fact that it deals, for the
+most part, with one special locality, a certain part of Georgia.
+
+"And in Spain--what excellent novelists they have there and have had for
+a long time! The realistic movement reached Spain long before it reached
+England and the United States. In fact, English-speaking countries were
+the last to accept it. I have taken great pleasure in the works of
+Armando Valdes. Then there are Perez Galdos and Emilia Pardo Bazian, and
+that priest who wrote a realistic novel about Madrid society. All these
+novelists are realists, and realists of power.
+
+"Then there are the great Scandinavians. I hope that I may some time
+attempt to express a little of my gratitude for the pleasure that
+Bjoernson's works have given me."
+
+I asked, "What do you think of contemporary poetry?"
+
+"I admired chiefly that of Thomas Hardy," said Mr. Howells. "His poems
+have force and actuality and music and charm. Masefield I like, with
+reservations. Three modern poets who give me great pleasure are Thomas
+Hardy, William Watson, and Charles Hanson Towne. The first one of Mr.
+Towne's poems that I read was "Manhattan." I have not forgotten the
+truth of that poetic interpretation of New York. His poems are beautiful
+and they are full of humanity. In his latest book there is a poem called
+'A Ballad of Shame and Dread' that moved me deeply. It is a slight
+thing, but it is wonderfully powerful. Like all of Towne's poetry, it is
+warm with human sympathy."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that the great social problems of the day, the
+feminine unrest, for instance, are finding their expression in
+literature?"
+
+"No," said Mr. Howells, "I cannot call to mind any adequate literary
+expression of the woman movement. Perhaps this is because the women who
+know most about it and feel it most strongly are not writers. The best
+things that have been said about woman suffrage in our time have been
+said by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. She has written the noblest satire
+since Lowell. What wit she has, and what courage! Once I heard her
+address a meeting of Single-Taxers. Now, the Single-Taxers are all right
+so far as they go, but they don't go far enough. The Single-Taxers
+heckled her, but she had a retort ready for every interruption. She
+stood there with her brave smile and talked them all down."
+
+"Do you think that Ibsen expressed the modern feminine unrest in _The
+Doll's House_?" Mr. Howells was asked.
+
+"Ibsen seldom expressed things," was his reply. "He suggested them,
+mooted them, but he did not express them. _The Doll's House_ does not
+express the meaning of unrest, it suggests it. Ibsen told you where you
+stood, not where to go."
+
+Mr. Howells had recently presided at a meeting which was addressed by
+M. Brieux, and he expressed great admiration for the work of the French
+dramatist.
+
+"He is a great dramatist," he said. "He has given faithful reports of
+life, and faithful reports of life are necessarily criticisms of life.
+All great novels are criticisms of life. And I think that the poets will
+concern themselves more and more with the life around them. It is
+possible that soon we may have an epic in which the poet deals with the
+events of contemporary life."
+
+Mr. Howells is keenly awake to the effect which the war is having on
+conditions in New York. And in his sympathy for the society which
+inevitably must suffer for a war in which it is not directly concerned,
+the active interest of the novelist was evident. "If all this only could
+be reflected in a book!" he said. "If some novelist could interpret
+it!"
+
+
+
+
+_THE JOYS OF THE POOR_
+
+KATHLEEN NORRIS
+
+
+Any young woman who desires to become a famous novelist and short-story
+writer like Kathleen Norris will do well to take the following steps: In
+the first place, come to New York. In the second place, marry some one
+like Charles Gilman Norris.
+
+Of course, every one who read _Mother_ and _The Rich Mrs. Burgoyne_ and
+_Saturday's Child_ knew that the author was a married woman--and also a
+married woman with plenty of personal experience with babies and stoves
+and servants and other important domestic items. But not until I visited
+Kathleen Norris at her very genuine home in Port Washington did I
+appreciate the part which that domestic item called a husband has played
+in Kathleen Norris's communications to the world.
+
+I made this discovery after Charles Gilman Norris--accompanied by
+little Frank, who bears the name of the illustrious novelist who was his
+uncle--had motored me through Port Washington's pleasant avenues to the
+Norris house. Before a fire of crackling hickory logs, Kathleen Norris
+(clad in something very charming, which I will not attempt to describe)
+was talking about the qualities necessary to a writer's success. And one
+of these, she said, was a business sense.
+
+Now, Mrs. Norris did not look exactly business-like. Nor is "a business
+sense" the quality which most readers would immediately hit upon as the
+characteristic which made the author of _Gayley the Troubadour_
+different from the writers of other stories. I ventured to suggest this
+to Mrs. Norris.
+
+"I don't claim to possess a business sense," she said. "But my husband
+has a business sense. He has taken charge of selling my stories to the
+magazines and dealing with publishers and all of that. I do think that
+literally thousands of writers are hindered from ever reaching the
+public by the lack of business sense. And I know that my husband has
+been responsible for getting most of my work published. My stories have
+appeared since my marriage, you know. I don't need to have a business
+sense, all I have to do is to write the stories. My husband does all
+the rest--I don't need even to have any of the author's complacency, or
+the author's pride!"
+
+Mrs. Norris's fame is only about five years old--about as old as her
+son. I asked her about her life before she was known as a writer,
+expecting to hear picturesque tales of literary tribulations among the
+hills of California. But her description of her journey to success was
+not the conventional one; her journey was not for years paved with
+rejection slips and illumined with midnight oil.
+
+"It was New York that did it," she said. "When we first came to New York
+from California the editor of a magazine with which Mr. Norris was
+connected gave us a tea. Most of the people who were present were
+short-story writers and novelists. It was pleasant for me to meet them,
+and I enjoyed the afternoon. But my chief sensation was one of shock--it
+was a real shock to me to find that writers were people!
+
+"I felt as if I had met Joan of Arc, Caesar, Cleopatra, Alexander the
+Great, and all the great figures of history, and found them to be human
+beings like myself. 'These writers are not supermen and superwomen,' I
+said to myself, 'they are human beings like me. Why can't I do what
+they're doing?'
+
+"I thought this over after we went home that evening. And I made a
+resolve. I resolved that before the next tea that I attended I would
+tell a story. And when I next went to a tea I had sold a story."
+
+"To what publication had you sold it?" I asked.
+
+"To an evening paper," said Mrs. Norris; "but I had written and sold a
+story. That was something; it meant a great deal to me. My first stories
+were all sold to this evening paper, for twelve dollars each. This paper
+printed a story every day, paying twelve dollars for each of them, and
+giving a prize of fifty dollars for the best story published each week.
+I won one of the fifty-dollar prizes."
+
+Any one who to-day could buy a Kathleen Norris story for fifty dollars
+would be not an editor, but a magician. Yet the memory of that early
+triumph seemed to give Mrs. Norris real pleasure.
+
+"I wrote _What Happened to Alanna_ two years before the Fire," she said.
+("The Fire" means only one thing when a Californian says it.) "But most
+of my stories have been written since I came to New York."
+
+I asked Mrs. Norris for the history of one of her earliest stories, a
+story of California life which appeared in the _Atlantic Monthly_. She
+said: "That story went to twenty-six magazines before it was printed. My
+husband had an alphabetical list of magazines. He sent the story first
+to the _Atlantic Monthly_ and then to twenty-five other magazines. They
+all returned it. Then he started at the top of the list again, and this
+time the _Atlantic Monthly_ accepted it."
+
+The mention of Mr. Norris's activities in selling this story brought our
+conversation back to the subject of the "business sense."
+
+"A writer needs the ability to sell a story as well as the ability to
+write it," said Mrs. Norris, "unless there is some one else to do the
+writing. Many a woman writes a really good story, sends it hopefully to
+an editor, gets it back with a printed notice of its rejection, and puts
+it away in a desk drawer. Then years later she tells her grandchildren
+that she once wanted to be an author, but found that she couldn't do it.
+
+"Now, that is no way for a writer to gain success. The writer must be
+persevering, not only in writing, but in trying to get his work before
+the public. Unless, as I said, there is some one else to supply the
+perseverance in getting the work before the public.
+
+"I think that the desire to write generally indicates the possession of
+the power to write. But young writers are too easily discouraged. But I
+have no right to blame a writer for being discouraged. I had frightful
+discouragement--until I was married."
+
+It is easy to see that Kathleen Norris does not hesitate to find in her
+own home life material for her industrious pen. Little Frank has
+undoubtedly served his mother as a model many times--which is not meant
+to indicate that he is that monstrosity, a model child. Indeed, Mrs.
+Norris believes that a novelist should use the material which lies ready
+at hand, instead of seeking for exotic and unusual topics. She sees that
+people want to read about the things with which they are already
+familiar, that they are not (as many young writers seem to think) eager
+for novelties.
+
+"I cannot understand," she said, "how it is that writers will clamor for
+recognition, and abuse the public for not welcoming them with
+enthusiasm, and yet will not give the public what they know that the
+public wants. So many people seem to want just their own sort of art,
+but to want money, too. Now, I wouldn't write for a million dollars some
+of those things that are called 'best sellers.' But I cannot see why a
+writer who is avowedly writing for the public should think it beneath
+him to treat the themes in which the public is interested. The greatest
+tragedy of literature is the writer who persists in trying to give the
+public what it does not want. Think of poor Gissing, for instance, dying
+embittered because he couldn't sell his work!"
+
+Mrs. Norris's conviction that a writer should use the material around
+him is so strong that she seems actually to be pained by the thought of
+all the excellent things for stories that are going to waste. I asked
+her if literature ever could come from apartment-houses. She said:
+
+"Of course it can! There is no reason why there shouldn't be good
+stories and novels of apartment-house life. One reason why we are not
+writing more and better stories of the life around us is because we are
+living that life so intensely--too intensely. We live in this country so
+close to our income that the problem of earning money makes us lose
+sight of the essentials of life. It would be a fine thing for us,
+mentally and spiritually, if we should live on less than we do. If, for
+example, a family that found it was in receipt of a few hundred dollars
+more a year than before should decide, therefore, to live under a
+simpler scale than before, to do away with some really worthless
+luxuries, what a fine thing that would be!"
+
+Of course many young writers come to Mrs. Norris for advice. And some of
+them excellently illustrate the tendency which she deprecates, the
+tendency to write about the unknown instead of the familiar.
+
+"I was talking the other day to a young girl of my acquaintance who is a
+costume model," she said. "She has literary aspirations. Now, her life
+itself has been an interesting story--her rise from a shopgirl to her
+present position. And every now and then she will say something to me
+that is a most interesting revelation--something that indicates the rich
+store of experience that she might, if she would, draw upon in her
+stories. On one occasion she said to me, 'I went home and put my
+shoe-drawer in order.'
+
+"'What do you mean?' I asked. 'What is your shoe-drawer?'
+
+"'Why, my shoe-drawer!' she answered. 'You see, we costume models have
+to have a drawer full of shoes, because we must change our shoes to
+match every costume.'
+
+"Why is it," asked Mrs. Norris, "that a girl like that cannot see the
+value of such an incident as that? That shoe-drawer is a picturesque and
+interesting thing, unknown to most people. And this girl, who knows all
+about it, and wants to write, cannot see its literary value! And yet
+what more interesting subject is there for her to write about than that
+shoe-drawer? I do not see why writers will not appreciate the importance
+of writing about the things that are around them."
+
+Mrs. Norris gave a somewhat embarrassed laugh. "I really shouldn't
+attempt to lay down the law in this way," she said. "I can speak only
+for myself--I must write of the people and things that I know best, but
+I ought not to attempt to prescribe what other people shall write
+about."
+
+Mrs. Norris's chief literary enthusiasm seems to be Charles Dickens.
+"When we were all infants out in the backwoods of California," she said,
+"we battened on Dickens. Dickens and a writer whom I don't suppose
+anybody reads nowadays--Henry Kingsley. The boys read Sir Walter
+Scott's novels, and left Dickens to me. I read Dickens with delight, and
+I still read him with delight. I have found passages in Dickens of which
+I honestly believe there are no equal in all English literature except
+in Shakespeare. I do not think that there is ever a year in which I do
+not read some of Dickens's novels over again. Of course, any one can
+find Dickens's faults--but I do not see how any one can fail to find his
+excellences."
+
+"What is it in Dickens that especially attracts you?" I asked.
+
+Mrs. Norris was silent for a moment. Then she said: "I think I like him
+chiefly because he saw so clearly the joys of the poor. He did not give
+his poor people nothing but disease and oppression and despair. He gave
+them roast goose and plum pudding for their Christmas dinner--he gave
+them faith and hope and love. He knew that often the rich suffer and the
+poor are happy.
+
+"Many of the modern realists seem ignorant of the fact that the poor may
+be happy. They think that the cotter's Saturday night must always be
+squalid and sordid and dismal, and that the millionaire's Saturday night
+must be splendid and joyful. As a matter of fact, the poor family may
+be, and often is, healthier and happier in every way than the rich
+family. But these extreme realists are not like Dickens, they have not
+his intimate knowledge of the life of the poor. They have the outsider's
+viewpoint.
+
+"Too many writers are telling us about the sorrows of the poor. We need
+writers who will tell us about the joys of the poor. We need writers who
+will be aware of the pleasures to be derived from a good dinner of
+corned beef and cabbage and a visit to a moving-picture theater. Often
+when I pass a row of mean houses, as they would be called, I think
+gratefully of the good times that I have had in just such places."
+
+The thought of that little Celtic Californian reading Dickens among the
+redwood-trees appealed to me. So I asked Mrs. Norris to tell more about
+her childhood.
+
+"Well," she said, "we hear a great deal about the misery, the bleak and
+barren lives of the children who live in the tenements of New York's
+lower East Side. But I think that an East Side tenement child would die
+of ennui if it should be brought up as we were brought up. We had none
+of the amusing and exciting experiences of the East Side child--we had
+no white stockings, no ice-cream cones, no Coney Island, nothing of the
+sort.
+
+"We never even went to school. We would study French for a while with
+some French neighbor who had sufficient leisure to teach us, and then
+we'd study Spanish for a while with some Spaniard. That was the extent
+of our schooling.
+
+"My parents died when I was eighteen years old. I went to the city and
+tried my hand at different sorts of work. For one thing, I tried to get
+up children's parties, but in eighteen months I managed only one. Then I
+did settlement work, was a librarian, a companion, and society reporter
+on a newspaper. Then I got married--and wrote stories."
+
+Mrs. Norris was at one time opposed to woman suffrage. Now, however, she
+is a suffragist, but she refuses to say that she has been "converted" to
+suffragism.
+
+"I can't say that I have been converted to suffragism," she said, "any
+more than I can say that I have been converted to warm baths and
+tooth-brushes. And it does not seem to me that any women should need to
+defend her right to vote any more than she should need to defend her
+right to love her children. There is a theme for a novel--a big
+suffrage novel will be written one of these days."
+
+It may be that the author of _Mother_ will be the author of this "big
+suffrage novel." But at present she disclaims any such intention. But
+she admits that there is a purpose in all her portrayals of normal,
+wholesome American home life.
+
+"I don't think that I believe in 'art for art's sake,' as it is
+generally interpreted," she said. "Of course, I don't believe in what is
+called the commercial point of view--I have never written anything just
+to have it printed. But I do not believe that there is any one standard
+of art. I think that any book which the people ought to read must have
+back of it something besides the mere desire of the writer to create
+something. I never could write without a moral intention."
+
+
+
+
+_NATIONAL PROSPERITY AND ART_
+
+BOOTH TARKINGTON
+
+
+Mr. Booth Tarkington never will be called the George M. Cohan of
+fiction. His novel, _The Turmoil_, is surely an indictment of modern
+American urban civilization; of its materialism, its braggadocio, its
+contempt for the things of the soul.
+
+It was with the purpose of making this indictment a little clearer than
+it could be when it is surrounded by a story, that I asked Mr.
+Tarkington a few questions. And his answers are not likely to increase
+our national complacencies.
+
+In the first place, I asked Mr. Tarkington if the atmosphere of a young
+and energetic nation might not reasonably be expected to be favorable to
+literary and artistic expression.
+
+"Yes, it might," said Mr. Tarkington. "There may be spiritual progress
+in America as phenomenal as her material progress.
+
+"There is and has been extraordinary progress in the arts. But the
+people as a whole are naturally preoccupied with their material
+progress. They are much more interested in Mr. Rockefeller than in Mr.
+Sargent."
+
+The last two sentences of Mr. Tarkington's reply made me eager for
+something a little more specific on that subject.
+
+"What are the forces in America to-day," I asked, "that hinder the
+development of art and letters?"
+
+Mr. Tarkington replied: "There are no forces in America to-day that
+hinder the development of individuals in art and letters, save in
+unimportant cases here and there. But there is a spirit that hinders
+general personal decency, knows and cares nothing for beauty, and is
+glad to have its body dirty for the sake of what it calls 'prosperity.'
+
+"It 'wouldn't give a nickel' for any kind of art. But it can't and
+doesn't hinder artists from producing works of art, though it makes them
+swear."
+
+"But do not these conditions in many instances seriously hinder
+individual artists?"
+
+Mr. Tarkington smiled. "Nothing stops an artist if he is one," he said.
+"But many things may prevent a people or a community from knowing or
+caring for art.
+
+"The climate may be unfavorable; we need not expect the Eskimos to be
+interested in architecture. In the United States politicians have
+usually controlled the public purchase of works of art and the erection
+of public buildings. This is bad for the public, naturally."
+
+"I suppose," I said, "that the conditions you describe are distinctively
+modern, are they not? At what time in the history of America have
+conditions been most favorable to literary expression?"
+
+Mr. Tarkington's reply was not what I expected. "At all times," he said.
+"Literary expression does not depend on the times, though the
+appreciation of it does, somewhat."
+
+I asked Mr. Tarkington if he agreed with Mr. Gouverneur Morris in
+considering the short story a modern development. He did not.
+
+"There are short stories in the Bible," he said, "and in every
+mythology; 'folk stories' of all races and tribes. Probably Mr. Morris's
+definition of the short story would exclude these. I agree with him that
+short stories are better written nowadays."
+
+"But you do not believe," I said, "that American literature in general
+is better than it used to be, do you? Why is it that there is now no
+group of American writers like the New England group which included
+Longfellow, Whittier, Lowell, Emerson, and Thoreau?"
+
+"Why is there," Mr. Tarkington asked in turn, "no group like Homer
+(wasn't he a group?) in Greece? There may be, but if there is just such
+a modern group it would tend only to repeat the work of the Homeric
+group, which wouldn't be interesting to the rest of us.
+
+"The important thing is to find a group unlike Longfellow, Whittier,
+Lowell, Emerson, and Thoreau. That is, if one accepts the idea that it
+is important to find a group."
+
+Mr. Tarkington's criticisms of the modern American city have been so
+severe that I expected him to tell me that all writers should live in
+the country. But again he surprised me. In reply to my question as to
+which environment was more favorable to the production of literature,
+the city or the country, he said:
+
+"It depends upon the nerves of the writer. A writer can be born
+anywhere, and he can grow up anywhere."
+
+There has recently been considerable discussion--Professor Edward
+Garnet and Gertrude Atherton have taken a considerable share in it--on
+the relative merits of contemporary English and American fiction. I
+asked Mr. Tarkington if in his opinion the United States had at the
+present time novelists equal to those of England.
+
+"That is unanswerable!" he answered. "Writers aren't like baseball
+teams. What's the value of my opinion that _The Undiscovered Country_ is
+a 'greater' novel than _A Pair of Blue Eyes_? These questions remind me
+of school debating societies. Nothing is demonstrated, but everybody has
+his own verdict."
+
+Until I asked Mr. Tarkington about it I had heard only two opinions as
+to the probable effect on literature of the war. One was that which
+William Dean Howells tersely expressed by saying: "War stops
+literature," and the other was that the war is purifying and
+strengthening all forms of literary expression.
+
+But Mr. Tarkington had something new to say about it. "What effect," I
+asked, "is the war likely to have on American literature?"
+
+"None of consequence," he answered. "The poet will find the subject, war
+or no war. The sculptor doesn't depend upon epaulets."
+
+Mr. Tarkington is so inveterate a writer of serials, and his work is so
+familiar to the readers of the American magazines, that I desired to get
+his expert opinion as to whether or not the American magazines, with
+their remarkably high prices, had harmed or benefited fiction. His reply
+was somewhat non-committal.
+
+"They have induced many people to look upon the production of fiction as
+a profitable business," he said. "But those people would merely not have
+'tried fiction' at all otherwise. Prices have nothing to do with art."
+
+Mr. Tarkington had some interesting things to say about that venerable
+mirage, the Great American Novel. I asked him if that longed-for work
+would ever be written; if, for example, there would ever be a work of
+fiction reflecting American life as _Vanity Fair_ reflects English life.
+He replied:
+
+"If Thackeray had been an American he would not have written a novel
+reflecting American life as _Vanity Fair_ reflected the English life of
+its time. He would have written of New York; his young men would have
+come there after Harvard. The only safe thing to say of the Great
+American Novel is that the author will never know he wrote it."
+
+Mr. Charles Belmont Davis had told me that a writer who had some means
+of making a living other than writing would do better work than one who
+devoted himself exclusively to literature. I asked Mr. Tarkington what
+he thought about this.
+
+"I think," he said, "that it would be very well for a writer to have
+some means of making a living other than writing. There are likely to be
+times in his career when it would give him a sense of security
+concerning food. But I doubt if it would much affect his writing, unless
+he considered writing to be a business."
+
+Mr. Tarkington's answer to my next question is hereby commended to the
+attention of all those feminine revolutionists who believe that they are
+engaged in the pleasant task of changing the whole current of modern
+thought.
+
+"How has literature been affected," I asked, "by the suffrage movement
+and feminism?"
+
+Mr. Tarkington looked up in some surprise. "I haven't heard of any
+change," he said.
+
+The author of _The Turmoil_ could never be accused of jingoism. But he
+is far from agreeing with those critics who believe that American
+literature is merely "a phase of English literature." I asked him if he
+believed that there was such a thing as a distinctively American
+literature.
+
+"Certainly," he replied. "Is _Huckleberry Finn_ a phase? It's a
+monument; not an English one. English happens to be the language largely
+used."
+
+The allusion in Mr. Tarkington's last reply suggested--what every reader
+of _Penrod_ must know--that this novelist is an enthusiastic admirer of
+Mark Twain. So I told him that Mr. T. A. Daly had classed Mark Twain
+with Artemus Ward and Q. K. Philander Doesticks, P.B., and had said that
+these men wrote nothing of real merit and were "the Charlie Chaplins of
+their time."
+
+Mr. Tarkington smiled. "Get Mr. T. A. Daly to talk some more," he said.
+"We'd like to hear something about Voltaire and Flo Ziegfeld. Second
+thoughts indicate that 'T. A. Daly' is the pen name of Mr. Charlie
+Chaplin. Of course! And that makes it all right and natural. I thought
+at first that it was a joke."
+
+
+
+
+_ROMANTICISM AND AMERICAN HUMOR_
+
+MONTAGUE GLASS
+
+
+Once upon a time William Dean Howells leveled the keen lance of his
+satire against what he called "the monstrous rag baby of romanticism."
+In those simple days, literary labels were easily applied. A man who
+wrote about Rome, Italy, was a romanticist; a man who wrote about Rome,
+New York, was a Realist.
+
+Now, however, a writer who finds his themes in the wholesale business
+district of New York City does not disavow the title formerly given
+exclusively to makers of drawn-sword-and-prancing-steed fiction.
+Montague Glass is a romanticist.
+
+The laureate of the cloak-and-suit trade and biographer of Mr. Abe
+Potash and Mr. Mawruss Perlmutter does not believe that romance is a
+matter of time and place. A realistic novel, he believes, may be written
+about the Young Pretender or Alexander the Great, and a romance
+about--well, about Elkan Lubliner, American.
+
+Of course, I asked him to defend his claim to the name of romanticist.
+He did so, but in general terms, without special reference to his own
+work. For this widely read author has the amazing virtue of modesty.
+
+"I do not think," he said, "that the so-called historical novelists are
+the only romanticists. The difference between the two schools of writers
+is in method, rather than in subject.
+
+"A romanticist is a writer who creates an atmosphere of his own about
+the things with which he deals. He is the poet, the constructive artist.
+He calls into being that which has not hitherto existed.
+
+"A realist, however, is a writer who faithfully reproduces an atmosphere
+that already exists. He reports, records; one of his distinguishing
+characteristics must be his attention to detail. The romanticist is as
+truthful as the realist, but he deals with a few large truths rather
+than with many small facts."
+
+"And you," I said, determined to make the conversation more personal,
+"prefer the romantic method?"
+
+"Yes," said Mr. Glass, "I do. I prefer to use the romantic method, and
+to read the works of the writers who use it. I believe that there is
+more value in suggestion than in detailed description. For instance, I
+do not think that my stories would gain vividness if I should put all
+the dialogue--I tell my stories chiefly by means of dialogues, you
+know--into dialect. So I do not put down the dialogue phonetically. I
+spell the words correctly, not in accordance with the pronunciation of
+my characters.
+
+"This is not an invariable rule. When, for instance, Abe or Mawruss has
+learned a new long word which he uses frequently to show it off, he
+generally mispronounces it. He may say 'quincidence' for 'coincidence.'
+Such a mispronunciation as this I reproduce, for it has its significance
+as a revelation of character. But I do not attempt to put down all
+mispronunciations; I let the dialect be imagined.
+
+"The romanticist, you see, uses his own imagination and expects
+imagination in his readers. His method might be called impressionistic;
+he outlines and suggests, instead of describing exhaustively. The
+romanticist really is more economical than the realist, and he has more
+restraint."
+
+"Who are the leading romanticists of the day?" I asked.
+
+"Well," Mr. Glass replied, "my favorite among contemporary romanticists
+is Joseph Conrad. There is a man who is certainly no swashbuckling
+novelist of the Wardour Street school. He writes of modern life, and yet
+he is a romanticist through and through.
+
+"I think that I may justly claim to be one of the first admirers of
+Conrad in America. I used to read him when apparently the only other man
+in this part of the world to appreciate him was William L. Alden, who
+praised him in the columns of the _New York Times Review of Books_.
+
+"I well remember my discovery of Conrad. I went to Brooklyn to hear
+'Tosca' sung at the Academy of Music. I had bought my ticket, and I had
+about an hour to spend before it would be time for the curtain to rise.
+So I went across the street to the Brooklyn Public Library.
+
+"While I was idly looking over the novels on the shelves I came upon
+Conrad's _Typhoon_. I sat down and began to read it.
+
+"When I arose, I had finished the book. Also, I had missed the first two
+acts of the opera--and I had been eager to hear them. But Conrad more
+than compensated for the loss of those two acts.
+
+"Many of the modern English writers are romanticists. Galsworthy surely
+is no realist. And William de Morgan, although he writes at great length
+and has abundance of detail, is a romanticist. He does not use detail
+for its own sake, as the realists use it; he uses it only when it has
+some definite value in unfolding the plot or revealing character. He
+uses it significantly; he is particularly successful in using it
+humorously, as Daudet and Dickens used it. Arnold Bennett is a realist,
+and I think that one of the reasons why he is so widely read in the
+United States is because the life which he describes so minutely is a
+life much like that of his American readers. People like to read about
+the sort of life they already know. The average reader wants to have a
+sense of familiarity with the characters in his novels."
+
+Mr. Glass is a contrary person. It is contrary for the only novelist who
+knows anything about New York's cloak-and-suit trade to be of English
+birth and to look like a poet. It is contrary of him to have that
+distinctively American play, "Potash and Perlmutter," start its London
+run two years ago and be "still going strong." And it was contrary of
+him not to say, as he might reasonably be expected to say in view of his
+own success, that the encounters and adventures of business must be the
+theme of the American novelists of the future.
+
+"No," he said, in answer to my question, "I do not see any reason for
+the novelist to confine himself to business life. Themes for fiction are
+universal. A novelist should write of the life he knows best, whatever
+it may be.
+
+"I do not mean that the novelist should write about his own business. I
+mean that he should write about the psychology that he understands. A
+man who spends years in the cloak-and-suit business is not, therefore,
+qualified to write novels about that business, even if he is qualified
+to write novels at all.
+
+"I had no real knowledge of the cloak-and-suit trade when I began to
+write about it. I made many technical blunders. For instance, I had
+Potash and Perlmutter buying goods by the gross instead of by the piece.
+And I received many indignant letters pointing out my mistake.
+
+"I had never been in the cloak-and-suit trade. But my work as a lawyer
+had brought me into contact with many people who were in that business,
+and I had intimate knowledge of the psychology of the Jew, his religion,
+his humor, his tragedy, his whole attitude toward life.
+
+"The trouble with many young writers," said Mr. Glass, "is that they
+don't know what they are writing about. They are attempting to describe
+psychological states of which they have only third-hand knowledge. Their
+ideas have no semblance of truth, and therefore their work is absolutely
+unconvincing."
+
+"At any rate," I said, "you will admit that American writers are more
+and more inclined to make the United States the scene of their stories.
+Do you think that O. Henry's influence is responsible for this?"
+
+"No," said Mr. Glass, "I do not think that this is due to O. Henry's
+influence. It was a natural development. You see, O. Henry's literary
+life lasted for only about four years, and while he has had many
+imitators, I do not think that he can be given credit for directing the
+attention of American writers to the life of their own country.
+
+"Probably William Dean Howells should be called the founder of the
+modern school of American fiction. He was the first writer to achieve
+distinguished success for tales of modern American life. There were
+several other authors who began to write about Americans soon after Mr.
+Howells began--Thomas Janvier, H. C. Bunner, and Brander Matthews were
+among them.
+
+"Kipling's popularity gave a great impetus to the writing of short
+stories of modern life. It is interesting to trace the course of the
+short story from Kipling to O. Henry.
+
+"Did you ever notice," asked Mr. Glass, "that the best stories on New
+York life are written by people who have been born and brought up
+outside of the city? The writer who has always lived in New York seems
+thereby to be disqualified from writing about it, just as the man in the
+cloak-and-suit trade is too close to his subject to reproduce it in
+fiction. The writer who comes to New York after spending his youth
+elsewhere gets the full romantic effect of New York; he gets a
+perspective on it which the native New-Yorker seldom attains. The
+viewpoint of the writer who has always lived in New York is subjective,
+whereas one must have the objective viewpoint to write about the city
+successfully.
+
+"I have been surprised by the caricatures of American life which come
+from the pen of writers American by birth and ancestry. Recently I read
+a novel by an American who has--and deserves, for he is a writer of
+talent and reputation--a large following. This was a story of life in a
+manufacturing town with which the novelist is thoroughly familiar. It,
+however, appears to have been written to satisfy a grudge and
+consequently one could mistake it for the work of an Englishman who had
+once made a brief tour of America. For the big manufacturer who was the
+principal character in the story was vulgar enough to satisfy the
+prejudice of any reader of the _London Daily Mail_. Certainly the
+descriptions of the gaudy and offensive furniture in the rich
+manufacturer's house and the dialogue of the members of his family and
+the servants could provide splendid ammunition for the _Saturday Review_
+or _The Academy_. The book appears to be a caricature, and yet that
+novelist had lived most of his life among the sort of people about whom
+he was writing!
+
+"And how absolutely ignorant most New-Yorkers are of New York. Irvin
+Cobb comes here from Louisville, Kentucky, and gets an intimate
+knowledge of the city, and puts that knowledge into his short stories.
+But a man brought up here makes the most ridiculous mistakes when he
+writes about New York.
+
+"I read a story of New York life recently that absolutely disgusted me,
+its author was so ignorant of his subject. Yet he was a born New-Yorker.
+Let me tell you what he wrote. He said that a man went into an arm-chair
+lunch-room and bought a meal. His check amounted to sixty-five cents!
+Now any one who knows anything about arm-chair lunch-rooms beyond the
+mere fact of their existence knows that the cashier of such an
+institution would drop dead if a customer paid him sixty-five cents at
+one time. Then, the hero of this story had as a part of his meal in this
+arm-chair lunch-room a baked potato, for which he paid fifteen cents!
+Imagine a baked potato in such a place, and a fifteen-cent baked potato
+at that!"
+
+Mr. Glass did not, like most successful humorists, begin as a writer of
+tragedy. His first story to be printed was "Aloysius of the Docks," a
+humorous story of an East Side Irish boy, which appeared in 1900. The
+lower East Side was for many years the scene of most of his stories. But
+he does resemble most other writers in this respect, that he wrote
+verse before he wrote fiction. I asked him to show me some of his
+poetry, and he demurred somewhat violently. But, after all, a poet is a
+poet, and at last I succeeded in persuading him to produce this exhibit.
+Here it is--a poem by the author of "Potash and Perlmutter":
+
+ FERRYBOATS
+
+ There sounds aloft a warning scream,
+ The jingling bell gives tongue below,
+ She breasts again the busy stream,
+ And cleaves its murky tide to snow.
+ Bereft of burnished glittering brass,
+ Ungainly bulging fore and aft,
+ Slowly from shore to shore they pass--
+ The matrons of the river craft.
+
+Mr. Glass believes that humorous writing in America has changed more
+than any other sort. But he does not, as I thought he would, attribute
+this change to the increased cosmopolitanism of the country, to the
+influx of people from other lands.
+
+"Certainly our ideas of what is funny have changed," he said. "Humor is
+an ephemeral thing. A generation ago we laughed at what to-day would
+merely make us ill. The subjects and the methods of the humorists are
+different. Who nowadays can find a laugh in the pages of Artemus Ward,
+Philander Q. Doesticks, or Petroleum V. Nasby? Yet in their time these
+men set the whole continent in a roar.
+
+"Contrast two humorists typical of their respective periods--Bill Nye
+and Abe Martin. I remember many years ago reading a story by Bill Nye
+which every one then considered tremendously funny. He told how he went
+downtown and got a shave and put on a clean collar and as he said,
+'otherwise disguised himself.' When he got home his little dog refused
+to recognize him, and several pages were devoted to his efforts to
+persuade the dog of his identity. Then, failing to convince the dog that
+he was really the same Bill Nye in spite of his shave and clean collar,
+he impaled it on a pitchfork and buried it, putting over it the epitaph,
+'Not dead, but jerked hence by request.'
+
+"Now contrast with that a good example of modern American humor--a joke
+by Abe Martin which I recently saw. There was a picture of two or three
+men looking at a tattered tramp, and one of them was represented as
+saying: 'You wouldn't think to look at him that that man played an
+elegant game of billiards ten years ago!'
+
+"It is an entirely different form of humor, you see. Bill Nye and the
+writers of his school got their effects by grotesque misspelling,
+fantastic ideas, and by the liberal use of shock and surprise. The
+modern humor is subtler, more delicate, and more likely to endure.
+
+"I do not think that the fact that America has become more cosmopolitan
+has anything to do with this altered sense of humor. The American
+humorists do not select cosmopolitan themes; the best of them are
+distinctively American in their subject. Irvin Cobb, George Fitch, Kate
+Douglas Wiggin, Edna Ferber Stewart, who wrote _The Fugitive
+Blacksmith_--all these people draw their inspiration from purely
+American phases of the life around them."
+
+"What is it, then," I asked, "that has changed American humor?"
+
+"Leisure," answered Mr. Glass. "Philander Q. Doesticks and other
+humorists of his time wrote to amuse pioneers, people rough and
+elemental in their tastes. Their audience consisted of men who worked
+hard most of the time, and therefore had to be hit hard by any joke that
+was to entertain them at all. But as Americans grew more leisurely, and
+therefore had time to read, see plays, and look at pictures, they lost
+their taste for crude and violent horseplay, and the new sort of humor
+came in. Undoubtedly the same thing occurs in every newly settled
+country--Australia, for example. It is unlikely that the Australian of
+one hundred years from now will be amused by the things that amuse
+Australians to-day.
+
+"But the humor that entertains the citizens of a country of which the
+civilization is well established is likely to retain its charm through
+the years. Mark Twain's stories do not lose their flavor. But Mark Twain
+was not exclusively a humorist; he was a student of life and he
+reflected the tragedy of existence as well as its comedy. So does Irvin
+Cobb, who is the nearest approach to Mark Twain now living.
+
+"One source of Mark Twain's strength is his occasional vulgarity. That
+surely is something that we should have in greater abundance in American
+humor. I do not mean that our humorists should be pornographic and
+obscene; I mean merely that they should be allowed great freedom in
+their choice of themes. There is no humor without vulgarity. Our
+humorists have been so limited and restrained that we have no paper fit
+to be compared with _Simplicissimus_ or _Le Rire_.
+
+"You see, a vulgar thing is not offensive if it is funny. Fun for fun's
+sake is a much more important maxim than art for art's sake. The
+humorists have a greater need for freedom in choice of themes than the
+serious writers, especially the realistic writers, who are always
+demanding greater freedom."
+
+Mr. Glass returned to the subject of the failure of cosmopolitanism to
+influence American literature by calling attention to the fact that very
+few American writers find their themes among their foreign-born
+fellow-citizens. "Where," he asked, "are the German-Americans and the
+Italian-Americans? No writer knows these foreign-born citizens well
+enough to write about them. The best American stories are about native
+Americans. I admit that my stories are not about people peculiar to New
+York--you can find counterparts of 'Potash and Perlmutter' in Berlin,
+Paris, and London. But mine are not among the best stories of American
+character. The best story of American character is 'Daisy Miller.'"
+
+Mr. Glass believes that the technique of the short story has improved
+greatly during the last score of years, but he is not so favorable in
+his view of the modern novel, especially of the "cross-section of life"
+type of work. He believes that the war will produce a great revival of
+literary excellence in Europe, just as the Franco-Prussian War did; and
+he called attention to something which has apparently been neglected by
+most people who have discussed the subject--the tremendous inspiration
+which Guy de Maupassant found in the Franco-Prussian War. But he said,
+in conclusion:
+
+"But any man who sits down to judge American literature in the course of
+a few minutes' talk is an ass for his pains. Literary snap judgments are
+foolish things. Nothing that I have said to you has any value at all."
+
+
+
+
+_THE "MOVIES" BENEFIT LITERATURE_
+
+REX BEACH
+
+
+Even the most prejudiced opponent of the moving pictures will admit that
+they are becoming more intellectually respectable. Crude farce and
+melodrama are being replaced by versions of classic plays and novels;
+literature is elevating the motion picture. And Mr. Rex Beach believes
+that the motion picture is benefiting literature.
+
+This author of widely read novels had been talking to me about the
+departments of literature--the novel, the short story, and the rest--and
+among them he named the moving picture. I asked him if he believed that
+moving pictures were dangerous for novelists, leading them to fill their
+books with action, with a view to the profits of cinematographic
+reproduction. He said:
+
+"Well, authors are human beings, of course. They like to make money and
+to have their work reach as large an audience as possible. I suppose
+that the great majority of them keep their eyes on the screen, because
+they know how profitable the moving picture is and because they want
+their work seen by more people than would read their novels."
+
+"Do you think that this harms their work?" I asked.
+
+"It might if the novelists overdid it," he answered. "It would harm
+their work if they became nothing but scenario writers. But so far the
+result has been good.
+
+"The tendency of the moving picture has been to make authors visualize
+more clearly than ever before their characters and scenes that they are
+writing about. Their work has become more realistic. I do not mean
+realistic in the sense in which this word is used of some French
+writers; I do not mean erotic or morbid. I mean actual, convincing,
+clearly visualized.
+
+"Literature has elevated the moving picture, keeping it out, to a great
+extent, of melodrama and slap-stick comedy. And in return, the moving
+picture has done a service to fiction, making the authors give more
+attention to exact visualization."
+
+"Has American fiction been lacking in visualization?" I asked.
+
+"No," said Mr. Beach. "American novelists visualize more clearly to-day
+than they did four or five years ago, before the moving picture had
+become so important, but they always were strong in visualization. This
+sort of realism is America's chief contribution to fiction."
+
+"Then you believe that there is a distinctively American literature?" I
+asked. "You do not agree with the critic who said that American
+literature was 'a condition of English literature'?"
+
+"I do not agree with him," Mr. Beach replied. "American writers use the
+English language, so I suppose that what they write belongs to English
+literature. But there is a distinctively American literature; Americans
+talk in their own manner, think in their own manner, and handle business
+propositions in their own manner, and naturally they write in their own
+manner. American literature is different from other kinds of literature
+just as American business methods are different from those of Europe.
+
+"Fiction written in America must necessarily be tinged with American
+thought and American action. I have no patience with people who say
+that America has no literature. They say that nothing we are writing
+to-day will live. Well, what if that is true? It's true not only of
+literature, but of everything else.
+
+"Our roads won't last forever; they're built in a hurry to be used in a
+hurry. But they're better roads to drive and motor over than those old
+Roman roads of Europe. Our office-buildings won't last as long as the
+Pyramids, but they're better for business purposes.
+
+"Personally, I've never been enthusiastic over things that have no
+virtues but age and ugliness. I'd rather have a good, strong,
+serviceable piece of Grand Rapids furniture than any ramshackle,
+moth-eaten antique."
+
+"But don't you think," I asked, "that the permanence of a book's appeal
+is a proof of its greatness?"
+
+"I don't see how we can tell anything definite about the permanence of
+the appeal of books written in our time. And I don't mean by literature
+writings that necessarily endure through the ages. I believe that
+literature is the expression of the mind, the sentiment, the
+intellectual attitude of the people who live at the time it is written.
+I admit that our literature is ephemeral--like everything else about
+us--but I believe that it is good."
+
+Mr. Rex Beach was not pacing his floor nervously; he was crossing the
+room with the practical intention of procuring a cigarette.
+Nevertheless, his firm tread lent emphasis to his remarks.
+
+"There is a sort of literary snobbery," he said, "noticeable among
+people who condemn contemporaneous literature just because it is
+contemporaneous. The strongest proof that there is something good in the
+literature of the day is that it reaches a great audience. There must be
+something in it or people wouldn't read it.
+
+"The people are the final judges; it is to them that authors must
+appeal. Take any big question of public importance--after it has been
+discussed by politicians and newspapers, it is the people who at last
+decide it.
+
+"A man may have devoted his life to some tremendous achievement, and
+have left it as a monument to his fame. But it is to public opinion that
+we must look for the verdict on the value of his life's work.
+
+"Take Carnegie, for example; when he dies, you bet people will have his
+number! His ideas are a tremendous menace, and the people who believe
+as he does about peace will find themselves generally execrated one of
+these days.
+
+"It may seem to you that this has nothing to do with literature. But it
+has a good deal to do with it. I know that many things have been said
+about the effect on literature of the war. But I want to say that the
+war will have, I hope, one admirable effect on American writers--it will
+make them stir up the American conscience to a sense of the necessity
+for national defensive preparation. The writers must educate the people
+in world politics and show them the necessity for defensive action.
+Americans have a sort of mental inertia in regard to public questions,
+and the writers must overcome this inertia.
+
+"The writers must stir up the politicians and the people. There's been a
+whole lot of mush written about peace. There always will be war. We
+can't reform the world.
+
+"The pacifists say that it is useless to arm because war cannot be
+prevented by armaments. The obvious answer to that is that neither can
+the failure to arm prevent war. And the verdict after the war will be
+better if we are prepared for it. The writers must call our attention to
+the folly of leaving ourselves open to attack.
+
+"It's hard to reach the conscience of the American people on any big
+issue. We are too independent, too indifferent, too ready to slump back.
+That's one of the penalties of democracy, I suppose; the national sense
+of patriotism becomes atrophied. It needs some whaling-big jolt to wake
+it up. Every American writer can help to do this.
+
+"The trouble is that we have too many men with feminine minds, too many
+of these delicate fellows with handkerchiefs up their sleeves. I can't
+imagine any women with ideas more feminine than those of Bryan--could
+any woman evolve anything more feminine than his peace-at-any-price
+idea?"
+
+Mr. Beach smiled. "I suppose I should not be talking about world
+politics," he said. "There are so many men who have specialized in that
+subject and are therefore competent to talk about it. I am only a
+specialist in writing."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that writers should be specialists in writing?
+Some people believe that the best fiction, for example, is produced by
+men who do some other work for a living."
+
+"I certainly believe that a writer should devote himself to writing,"
+said Mr. Beach. "This is an age of specialization, and literature is no
+exception to the general rule. Literature is like everything else--you
+must specialize in it to be successful."
+
+"This has not always been the case, has it?" I asked. "Has literature
+been produced by people who made writing only an avocation?"
+
+"Surely," said Mr. Beach. "It is only within the last few years that
+writers have been able to write for a living and make enough to keep the
+fringe off their cuffs."
+
+I asked what had caused this change.
+
+"It has been caused chiefly by the magazines. The modern magazines have
+done two important things for fiction--they have brought it within every
+one's reach, and they have increased the prices paid to the authors,
+thus enabling them to make a living by devoting themselves exclusively
+to writing."
+
+"But it has been said," I ventured, "that a writer, no matter how
+talented he may be, cannot make a comfortable living out of writing
+fiction unless he is most extraordinarily gifted with ideas, and that,
+therefore, a writer takes a tremendous risk if he throws himself upon
+literature for support."
+
+"How is a writer going to get ideas for stories," asked Mr. Beach, in
+turn, "unless he uses ideas? The more ideas a man uses, the more ideas
+will come to him.
+
+"The imaginative quality in a man is like any other quality; the more it
+is functioned the better it is functioned. If you fail to use any organ
+of your body, nature will in time let that organ go out of commission.
+
+"It is just the same with imagination as with any organ of the body. If
+a writer waits for ideas to come to him and ceases to exercise his
+imagination, his imagination will become atrophied. But if he uses his
+imagination it will grow stronger and ideas will come to him with
+increasing frequency."
+
+Mr. Beach is an enthusiastic advocate of the moving picture. In the
+course of his discussion of it he advanced an interesting theory as to
+the next stage of its development.
+
+"The next use of the moving picture," he said, "will be the editorial
+use. We have had the moving picture used as a comic device, as a device
+to spread news, and as an interpreter of fiction. But as yet no one has
+endeavored to use it as a means to mold public opinion in great vital
+issues of the day.
+
+"Of course, it has been used educationally, and as part of various
+propaganda schemes. But it will be used in connection with great
+political problems. It will become the most powerful of all influences
+for directing public opinion in politics and in everything else.
+
+"It will play a mighty part in the thought of the country and of the
+world.
+
+"I have seen men and women coming from a great moving-picture show
+almost hysterical with emotion. I have heard them shout and stamp and
+whistle at what they saw flashed before them on a white sheet as they
+never did in any theater.
+
+"What a strong argument 'The Birth of a Nation' presents! Now, suppose
+that same art and that same equipment were used to present arguments
+about some political issue of our own time, instead of one of our
+fathers' time. What a force that would be!"
+
+
+
+
+_WHAT IS GENIUS?_
+
+ROBERT W. CHAMBERS
+
+
+Sentimental Tommy's great predecessor in the relentless pursuit of the
+"right word" was, teachers of literature tell us, the unsentimental
+Gustave Flaubert. But these academic gentlemen, who insist that the
+writer shall spend hours, even days, if necessary, in perfecting a
+single sentence, seldom produce any literature. I asked Robert W.
+Chambers, who has written more "best sellers" than any other living
+writer, what he thought of Flaubert's method of work.
+
+He looked at me rather quizzically. "I think," he said, with a smile,
+"that Flaubert was slow. What else is there to think? Of course he was a
+matchless workman. But if he spent half a day in hunting for one word,
+he was slow, that's all. He might have gone on writing and then have
+come back later for that inevitable word."
+
+"But what do you think of Flaubert's method, as a method?" I asked. "Do
+you think that a writer who works with such laborious care is right?"
+
+"It's not a question of right or wrong," said Mr. Chambers, "it's a
+question of the individual writer's ability and tendency. If a man can
+produce novels like those of Flaubert, by writing slowly and
+laboriously, by all means let him write that way. But it would not be
+fair to establish that as the only legitimate method of writing.
+
+"Some authors always write slowly. With some of them it's like pulling
+teeth for them to get their ideas out on paper. It's the same way in
+painting. You may see half a dozen men drawing from the same model. One
+will make his sketch premier coup; another will devote an hour to his;
+another will work all day. They may be artists of equal ability. It is
+the result that counts, not the method or the time."
+
+"And what is it that makes a man an artist, in pigments or in words?" I
+asked. "Do you believe in the old saying that the poet--the creative
+artist--is born and not made?"
+
+"No," said Mr. Chambers, "I do not think that that is the truth. I think
+that with regard to the writer it is true to this extent, that there
+must exist, in the first place, the inclination to write, to express
+ideas in written words. Then the writer must have something to express
+really worthy of expression, and he must learn how to express it. These
+three things make the writer--the inclination to say something, the
+possession of something worth saying, and the knowledge of how to say
+it."
+
+"And where does genius come in?" I asked.
+
+"What is genius?" asked Mr. Chambers, in turn. "I don't know. Perhaps
+genius is the combination of these three qualities in the highest
+degree.
+
+"Of course," he added, with a laugh, "I know that all this is contrary
+to the opinion of the public. People like to believe that writers depend
+entirely upon an inspiration. They like to think that we are a hazy lot,
+sitting around and posing and waiting for some sort of divine afflatus.
+They think that writers sit around like a Quaker meeting, waiting for
+the spirit to move them."
+
+"But have there not been writers," I asked, "who seem to prove that
+there is some truth in the inspiration theory? There is William de
+Morgan, for example, beginning to write novels in his old age. He spent
+most of his life in working in ceramics, not with words."
+
+"On the contrary," said Mr. Chambers, "I think that William de Morgan
+proves my theory. He really spent all his life in learning to write--he
+was in training for being a novelist all the while. The novelist's
+training may be unconscious. He must have--as William de Morgan surely
+always has had--keen interest in the world. That is the main thing for
+the writer to have--a vivid interest in life. If we are to devote
+ourselves to the production of pictures of humanity according to our own
+temperaments, we must have this vivid interest in life; we must have
+intense curiosity. The men who have counted in literature have had this
+intense, never-satiated curiosity about life.
+
+"This is true for the romanticists as well as the realists. The most
+imaginative and fantastic romances must have their basis in real life.
+
+"I know of no better examples of this truth than the gargoyles which one
+sees in Gothic architecture in Europe. These extraordinary creatures
+that thrust their heads from the sides of cathedrals, misshapen and
+grotesque, are nevertheless thoroughly logical. That is, no matter how
+fantastic they may be, they have backbones and ribs and tails, and these
+backbones and ribs and tails are logical--that is, they could do what
+backbones and ribs and tails are supposed to do.
+
+"In real life there are no creatures like the gargoyles, but the
+important thing is that the gargoyles really could exist. This is a good
+example of the true method of construction. The base of the construction
+must rest on real knowledge. The medieval sculptors knew the formation
+of existing animals; therefore they knew how to make gargoyles."
+
+"How does this theory apply to poets?" I asked.
+
+"I don't know," answered Mr. Chambers, "but it seems to me to apply to
+all creative work. The artist must know life before he can build even a
+travesty on life."
+
+I called Mr. Chambers's attention to the work of certain ultra-modern
+poets who deliberately exclude life from their work. He was not inclined
+to take them seriously.
+
+"There always have been aberrations," he said, "and there always will
+be. They're bound to exist. And there is bound to be, from time to time,
+attitudinizing and straining after effect on the part of prose writers
+as well as poets. And it is all based on one thing--self-consciousness.
+It is self-consciousness that spoils the work of some modern writers."
+
+I asked Mr. Chambers to be more specific in his allusions. "I cannot
+mention names," he said, "but there are certain writers who are always
+conscious of the style in which they are writing. Sometimes they
+consciously write in the style of some other men. They are thinking all
+the while of their technique and equipment, and the result is that their
+work loses its effect. A writer should not be convinced all the while
+that he is a realist or a romanticist; he should not subject himself
+deliberately to some special school of writing, and certainly he should
+not be conscious of his own style. The less a writer thinks of his
+technique the sooner he arrives at self-expression.
+
+"It's just like ordinary conversation. A man is known by the way in
+which he talks--that is his 'style.' But he is not all the while acutely
+conscious of his manner of talking--unless he has an impediment in his
+speech. So the writer should be known by his untrammeled and
+unembarrassed expression."
+
+I asked Mr. Chambers what he thought of the idea that the popularity of
+magazines has vitiated the public taste and lowered the standard of
+fiction.
+
+"I do not think that this is the case," he said. "I do not see that the
+custom of serial publication has harmed the novel. It is not a modern
+innovation, you know. The novels of Dickens, Thackeray, and George Eliot
+had serial publication. But I do believe that the American public reads
+less fiction than it did a generation ago, and that its taste is not so
+good as it was."
+
+This was a surprising statement to come from an author whom the public
+has received with such enthusiasm, so I asked Mr. Chambers to explain.
+
+"In the days of our forefathers," he said, "this was an Anglo-Saxon
+country. Then the average intelligence of the nation was higher and the
+taste in literature better. But there came the great rush of immigration
+to the United States from Europe, and the Anglo-Saxon culture of the
+country was diluted.
+
+"You see signs of this lowered standard of taste in fiction and on
+the stage. The demand is for primitive and childish stuff, and the
+reason for this is that the audience has only a sort of backstairs
+intelligence. If we had progressed along the lines in which we were
+headed before this wave of immigration, we would not be satisfied with
+the books and magazines that are given us to-day.
+
+"Of course the magazines are mechanically better to-day than they were a
+generation ago. Then we had not the photogravure and the half-tone and
+the other processes that make our magazines beautiful. But we had better
+taste and also we had more leisure.
+
+"I remember when one of the most widely read of our magazines was a
+popular science monthly, which printed articles by great scientists on
+biological and other topics. That was in the days when Darwin was
+announcing his theory of evolution--the first great jolt which orthodoxy
+received. People would not take time to read a magazine of that sort
+now. They are so occupied with business and dancing and all sorts of
+occupations that they have little leisure for reading."
+
+Mr. Chambers stopped talking suddenly and laughed. "I'm not a good man
+for you to bring these questions to," he said, "because I never have had
+any special reverence for books or literature as such. I reverence the
+books that I like, not all books."
+
+"And have you such a thing as a favorite author?" I asked.
+
+"Yes," said Mr. Chambers. "Dumas."
+
+During the 1870's Mr. Chambers was an art student in Paris, and he has
+many interesting memories of the French and English writers and painters
+who have made that period memorable. He knew Paul Verlaine (whose poetry
+he greatly admires), Charles Conder, and Aubrey Beardsley.
+
+"One day," he said, "I was out on a shooting-trip--I think it was in
+Belgium--and I met a young English poet, a charming fellow, whose work I
+was later to know and like. It was the poet who wrote at least one great
+poem--'Cynara'--it was Ernest Dowson.
+
+"I knew many of the Beaux Arts crowd, because my brother was a student
+of architecture at the Beaux Arts. And they were a decent, clean
+crowd--they were not 'decadents.' I do not take much stock in the pose
+of 'decadence,' nor in the artistic temperament. I never saw a real
+artist with the artistic temperament. I always associated that with
+weakness."
+
+Mr. Chambers, although he has intimate knowledge of the Quartier Latin,
+has little use for "Bohemia."
+
+"What is Bohemia?" he asked. "If it is a place where a number of artists
+huddle together for the sake of animal warmth, I have nothing to say
+against it. But if it is a place where a number of artists come to
+scorn the world, then it is a dangerous thing. The artist should not
+separate himself from the world.
+
+"These artistic and literary cults are wrong. I do not believe in
+professional clubs and cliques. If writers form a combination for
+business reasons, that is all right, but a writer should not associate
+exclusively with other writers; he should do his work and then go out
+and see and talk to people in other professions. We should sweep the
+cobwebs from the profession of writing and not try to fence it in from
+the public."
+
+To the somewhat trite question as to the effects of the war on
+literature, Mr. Chambers made first his usual modest answer, "I don't
+know." But when I told him of the author who had dogmatically stated
+that war always stops literature, and that the Civil War had produced no
+writing worthy of preservation, Mr. Chambers reconsidered.
+
+"Did he say that the Civil War had produced no literature worthy of
+preservation?" he said. "He must have forgotten that the Civil War
+caused one man to make contributions to our literature as valuable as
+anything we possess. He must have forgotten Abraham Lincoln."
+
+Before I left, I mentioned to Mr. Chambers the theory that literature
+is better as a staff than as a crutch, as an avocation than as a
+vocation. This, like the "inevitable word" theory, is greatly beloved by
+college professors. Mr. Chambers said:
+
+"I disagree utterly with that theory. Do you remember how Dr. Johnson
+wrote _Rasselas_? It was in order to raise the money to pay for his
+mother's funeral. I believe that the best work is done under pressure.
+Of course the work must be enjoyed; a man in choosing a profession
+should select that sort of work which he prefers to do in his leisure
+moments. Let him do for his lifework the task which he would select for
+his leisure--and let him not take himself too seriously!"
+
+
+
+
+_DETERIORATION OF THE SHORT STORY_
+
+JAMES LANE ALLEN
+
+
+That Edgar Allan Poe, in spite of his acknowledged genius, has had
+practically no influence on the development of the short story in
+America, and that the current short story written in America is inferior
+to that written during the years between 1870 and 1895, these are two
+remarkable statements made to me by James Lane Allen, the distinguished
+author of _The Choir Invisible_, _The Mettle of the Pasture_, and many
+another memorable novel.
+
+I found Mr. Allen in the pleasant workroom of his New York residence.
+Himself a Southerner, he is an enthusiastic admirer of the poet whose
+name is inseparably linked with Southern letters. But I was soon to find
+that he does not share the opinion of those who consider Poe the
+originator of the modern short story, nor does he rate Poe's influence
+in fiction as very wide.
+
+"There is always much interest in short stories," he said, "among
+authors, and in the great body of readers. You say that Mr. Gouverneur
+Morris believes that except Poe almost no writer before our generation
+could write short stories.
+
+"I do not wish to be placed in a position of publicly criticizing Mr.
+Gouverneur Morris's opinion of the short story. But it may not seem
+antagonistic to the opinion of any one to call attention to the fact
+that, of all American short stories yet written, the two most widely
+known in and outside our country were written independently of Poe.
+These are _The Man Without a Country_ and _Rip Van Winkle_.
+
+"As the technique of the American short story is understood and applied
+to-day, neither of these two stories can be regarded as a work of
+impeccable art. But flaws have not kept them from fame. By a common
+verdict the flawless short stories of the day are fameless. Certainly,
+also, Hawthorne was uninfluenced by Poe in writing short stories that
+remain secure among brief American classics.
+
+"This, of course, is limiting the outlook to our own literature. Beyond
+our literature, what of Balzac? In the splendor of his achievements with
+the novel, Balzac has perhaps been slighted as a master of the short
+story. Think, for instance, of such a colossal fragment as _The Atheists
+Mass_.
+
+"And what of Boccaccio? For centuries before Poe, the _Decameron_ shone
+before the eyes of the world as the golden treasury of model forms for
+the short story.
+
+"And centuries before Boccaccio, flashing from hand to hand all over the
+world, there was a greater treasury still, the treasury of _The Arabian
+Nights_.
+
+"It is no disparagement to Poe to say that his genius did not
+originate the genius of the short story. His true place, his logical
+place, in the development of the short story is that of a man with
+ancestors--naturally!
+
+"Since there is a breath of nativity blowing through his stories, I
+think it is the breath of far distant romance from somewhere. Certainly
+his stories are as remote from our civilization and from all things
+American as are Oriental tales."
+
+Mr. Allen showed he had given much thought to Edgar Allan Poe's place
+among the American fiction writers, so I thought that he might also have
+some interesting things to say about Poe as a poet. He had. He mentioned
+a quality of Poe's verse which for some reason or other seems
+heretofore to have escaped the notice of students of American poetry.
+
+"It may be worth while calling attention," he said, "to the fact that
+nearly all of Poe's poems belong to the night. Twelve o'clock noon never
+strikes to his poetic genius. His best poems are Poe's Nights, if not
+_Arabian Nights_.
+
+"There is a saying that the German novel long ago died of the full moon.
+To Poe the dead moon was the orb of life. The sun blotted him out."
+
+Great as is his admiration for Poe's genius, Mr. Allen does not believe
+he has greatly influenced American prose. He said:
+
+"As to the influence of Poe's short stories in our country, this seems
+to be a tradition mainly fostered by professors of English in American
+universities and by the historians of our literature. The tradition does
+not prevail among American writers. Actually there is no traceable stamp
+of the influence of his prose writings on the work of any American
+short-story writer known to me, save one. That one is Ambrose Bierce."
+
+"Why is it," I asked, "that Poe's influence on American fiction has been
+so slight?"
+
+"The main reason," Mr. Allen answered, "why Poe's stories have remained
+outside American imitation or emulation is perhaps because they are
+projected outside American sympathies. They lie to-day where they lay
+when they were written--beyond the confines of what the German calls the
+literature of the soil.
+
+"Poe and Ambrose Bierce are at least to be linked in this: that they are
+the two greatest and the two coldest of all American short-story
+writers. Any living American fictionist will perhaps bear testimony to
+the fact that he has never met any other writer who has been influenced
+by the stories of Poe."
+
+"Mr. Allen," I said, "you believe that the American short story has not
+been influenced by Poe; has the American short story, however, improved
+since his time?"
+
+"The renascence of the American short story," said Mr. Allen,
+thoughtfully, "its real efflorescence as a natural literary art form,
+took place after the close of the Civil War. The historians of our
+literature have, perhaps, as is customary with them, held to the strict
+continuity of tradition as explaining this renascence. If so, they have
+omitted one of the instinctive forces of human nature, which invariably
+act in nations that have literatures and act ungovernably at the
+termination of all wars.
+
+"After any war spontaneity in story-telling is one of the ungovernable
+impulses of human nature. This can be traced from modern literature back
+to primitive man returning from his feuds. When he had no literature, he
+carved his story on the walls of his cave or on a bone to tell the glory
+of the fight. Before he could even carve a bone he hung up a row of the
+heads of the defeated. Perhaps the original form of the war short story
+was a good, thick volume of heads. Within our own civilization the
+American Indian told his short stories in this way--with American heads
+or tufts of scalps--a sad way of telling them for our forefathers.
+
+"At the close of the American Civil War the atmosphere, both North and
+South, was charged with stories. The amazing fact is not that short
+stories should have begun at that time, but that they should have begun
+with such perfection. This perfection expressed itself more richly
+during the period, say, from 1870 to 1895--twenty-five years--than it
+has ever done since.
+
+"The evidence is at hand that the best of the American short stories
+written during that period outweigh in value those that have been
+written later--with the exception of those of one man. And this evidence
+takes this form--that these stories were collected into volumes, had an
+enormous sale, had the highest critical appreciation, have passed into
+the histories of literature written since, have gone into the courses of
+English literature now being taught in the universities, and are still
+steadily being sold.
+
+"Is this true of the best short stories being written now? Are any of
+the short stories written since that period being bound into volumes and
+extensively sold? Do the professors of English literature recommend them
+to their classes? That is the practical test.
+
+"The one exception is O. Henry. He alone stands out in the later period
+as a world within himself; as much apart from any one else as are
+Hawthorne and Poe."
+
+Mr. Allen did not express an opinion as to the probable effects on
+literature of the war. He said:
+
+"Now, the North and the South in the renascence of the short story after
+the Civil War divide honors about equally. But it is impossible to speak
+of the Southern short story, or indeed of Southern literature at all,
+without being brought to the brink of a subject which lies back of the
+whole philosophy of Southern literature."
+
+Mr. Allen paused for a moment. Then he continued, speaking with an
+intensity which reminded me of his Southern birth and upbringing:
+
+"Suppose that at the end of the present European war Germany should be
+victorious and France defeated. And suppose that in France there should
+not be left a single publishing-house, a single literary periodical, a
+single literary editor, a single critic, and scarcely even a single
+buyer of books.
+
+"And suppose that the defeated French people wanted to cry out their
+soul over their defeat and against their conquerors. And suppose that in
+order to do this every French novelist, short-story writer, or poet,
+unable to keep silent, should begin to write and begin to send his novel
+or his short story or his poem over into Germany to be read by a German
+editor, published by a German publisher, and sold in a German bookshop
+to a German reader. What kind of French literature of the war do you
+think would appear in Germany and be fostered there?
+
+"But this is exactly what happened after the war between the North and
+the South.
+
+"The few voices that began to be sent northward across the demolished
+battle-line could only be the voices that would be listened to and
+welcomed on the other side. That is the reason why that first literature
+was so mild, so tempered, so thin, so devitalized, that it seemed not to
+come from an enraged people, but from the memories of their ghosts.
+
+"As a result of finding war literature inexpressible in such conditions,
+the young generation of Southerners dropped the theme of war altogether
+and explored other paths. So that perhaps the most original and
+spontaneous fragments of this new Southern post-bellum literature are in
+the regions of the imagination, where no note of war is heard.
+
+"It is not beyond the bounds of possibility that if Joel Chandler
+Harris, a young Southerner, had possessed full freedom to wreak his
+genius on the war, the world might never have heard of 'Uncle Remus.'
+The world might never have known that among the cotton-plantations there
+dwelt a brother to AEsop and to La Fontaine."
+
+
+
+
+_SOME HARMFUL INFLUENCES_
+
+HARRY LEON WILSON
+
+
+From the Pacific Coast--from what is enthusiastically termed "the Golden
+West"--from that section of the United States which is large and
+chivalrous and gladly suffers suffrage--comes a voice, replying to my
+question: "What is the matter with contemporary fiction?"
+
+And the voice says, "_Cherchez la femme!_"
+
+It is the voice of Mr. Harry Leon Wilson, author of _Bunker Bean_,
+_Ruggles of Red Gap_, and many another popular novel, and co-author with
+Mr. Booth Tarkington of several successful plays. Mr. Wilson believes
+that the dullness and insincerity of our novels are due to the taste of
+most of their readers--that is, to the taste of the women.
+
+I asked Mr. Wilson what, in his opinion, was the influence most harmful
+to the development of literature in America.
+
+"I know little about literature," Mr. Wilson replied, "but if you mean
+the novel, I should say the intense satisfaction with it as it is, of
+the maker, the seller, and the buyer. And to trace this baneful
+satisfaction to its source, I should say it lies in the lack of a
+cultivated taste in our women readers of fiction.
+
+"Publishers are agreed, I believe, that women buy the great bulk of
+their output. The current novel is as deliberately planned to please the
+woman buyer as is any other bit of trade goods. The publisher knows what
+she wants to read, the writer finds out from the publisher, and you can
+see the result in the advertisements--and the writer's royalty
+statements.
+
+"'We want,' says the publisher, 'a stunning girl for the cover and a
+corking good love interest to catch the women.' (Publishers do talk that
+way when they have safely locked themselves in their low dens.)
+
+"This love interest is always said to be wholesome and sweet. I don't
+know. Certainly it is sweet enough. In the trade novel it's as if you
+took a segment of rich layer cake, the chocolate-and-jelly kind, poured
+over it a half-pint of nice thick molasses, and then, just to make sure,
+sprinkled this abundantly with fine sugar.
+
+"Anyway, that's what the publisher has found--and he has the best means
+of knowing--that the American woman will buy year in and year out. And
+you can't blame him for printing it. A publisher with ideals of his own
+couldn't last any longer than a grocer with ideals of his own, or a
+clergyman.
+
+"And least of all can you blame the author for writing this slush,
+because nine times out of ten he doesn't know any better. How should he,
+with no one to tell him?
+
+"And that," said Mr. Wilson, "is another evil almost as great in its
+influence as the undeveloped taste of our women readers. I mean our lack
+of authoritative criticism. Now we really do get a good novel once in a
+blue moon, but one who has been made wary by the mass of trade novels
+would never suspect it from reading our book reviews. The good novel, it
+is true, is praised heartily, but then so are all the bad novels--and
+how is one to tell?
+
+"At least eighty-five per cent. of our book reviews are mere amiable,
+perfunctory echoes of the enthusiastic 'canned' review which the
+publisher obligingly prints on the paper jacket of his best seller. I
+sometimes suspect this task is allotted to a member of the staff who is
+known to be 'fond of reading.'
+
+"Another evil influence is often alleged--the pressure the business
+office puts on the reviewer to be tender with novels that are lavishly
+advertised, but I have never thought there was more than a grain of
+truth in this.
+
+"Perhaps a publisher wouldn't continue to patronize a sheet that
+habitually blurted out the truth about his best sellers, but I really
+doubt that this was ever put to an issue. I don't believe the average
+book-reviewer knows any better than the average novelist the difference
+between a good and a bad novel.
+
+"It isn't so with the other arts. We have critics for those. Music,
+sculpture, painting--we know the best and get the best.
+
+"But, then, the novel is scarcely considered to be an art form. Any one
+can--and does--write a novel, if he can only find the time. It isn't
+supposed to be a thing one must study, like plumbing or architecture.
+
+"The novelist who wants to write a best seller this year studies the
+best seller of last year, and wisely, because that is what the publisher
+wants--something like his last one that sold big. He is looking for it
+night and day and for nothing else. He wants good carpenters who have
+followed the design that women have liked. Fiction is the one art you
+don't take seriously, and there is no one to tell us we should; there
+are no critics to inform the writers and the readers and make the
+publishers timid.
+
+"True, we have in this country two or three, possibly four, critics who
+can speak with authority, men who know what the novel has been, what it
+is with us, what it ought to be. One of them is a friend of mine, and I
+reproached him lately for not speaking out in meeting oftener.
+
+"His defense was pathetic. First, that ninety out of a hundred of our
+novels are beneath criticism. Second, as to the remaining ten that would
+merit the rapier instead of the bludgeon--'criticism is harder to sell
+than post-meridian virtue. I have tried.'
+
+"And he has to eat as often as any publisher. So there you are! People
+are not going to pay him for finding fault with something they are
+intensely satisfied with. It all comes back to the women. When their
+taste is corrected we shall have better novels. But not before then!"
+
+"Mr. Wilson," I said, "do you believe that the development of the
+magazine, with its high prices and serialization, has been harmful or
+beneficial to fiction?"
+
+"In the first place, the magazine hasn't developed," he answered. "It
+has merely multiplied--the cheap ones, I mean. And prices have not
+increased except to about a dozen of our national favorites. Where there
+is one writer who can get fifteen hundred dollars for a short story, or
+fifteen thousand dollars for the serial rights to a novel, there are a
+thousand who can get not more than a fifteenth of those prices.
+
+"On the whole, I think that the effect of the cheap monthlies has been
+good. They are the only ones that welcome the new writer. They try him
+out. Then, if the public takes to him, the better magazines find it out
+after a while and form an alliance with him--that is, if his characters
+are so sweet and wholesome that the magazine can still be left on the
+center-table where Cuthbert or Berryl might see it after school.
+
+"Nowadays I never expect to find a good short story in any of the cheap
+magazines. Of course, it does happen now and then, but not often enough
+to make me impatient for their coming. And, of course, the cheap
+monthlies do print, for the most part, what are probably the worst
+short stories that will ever be written in the world--the very furthest
+from anything real.
+
+"These writers, too, like the novelists, study one another instead of
+life. We will say one of them writes a short story about a pure young
+shopgirl of flower-like beauty who, spending an evening of innocent
+recreation in a notorious Tenderloin dive (one of those places that I,
+for one, have never been able to find), is insulted by the leader of
+Tammany Hall, who is always hanging around there for evil purposes. At
+the last moment she is saved from his loathsome advances by a dashing
+young stranger in a cute-cut blue serge suit, who carries her off in a
+taxicab and marries her at 2 A.M. And he, of course, proves to be the
+great traction magnate who owns all the city's surface-car lines.
+
+"The other writers, and some new ones that never before thought of
+writing, read this story, which is called 'All for Love,' and learn to
+do the 'type'--the pure young shopgirl, a bit slangy in spite of her
+flower-like beauty; the abhorrent politician (some day he will have a
+distressing mix-up with his very own daughter in one of these evil
+places--see if he doesn't!), the low-browed dive-keeper, and the honest
+young traction magnate. They will learn with a little practice to do
+these as the dupes of the 'Be-a-cartoonist!' schools learn to draw 'An
+Irishman,' 'A German,' 'A Jew,' and the dental facade of Colonel
+Roosevelt.
+
+"But we must remember that O. Henry came to us from the cheap magazines,
+never did get into the higher-priced ones, and was, by the way,
+wretchedly paid for his stories. True, he received good prices in his
+later days, but I doubt if they raised the average for his output to two
+hundred dollars a story. He neglected to come to the feast in a wedding
+garment, so the more pretentious magazines would have none of him.
+
+"For one O. Henry, then, we can forgive the lesser monthlies for the
+bulk of their stuff that can be read only by born otoliths. The more
+magazines, the better our chance of finding the new man, and only in the
+cheap ones can he come to life."
+
+Many dogmatic statements have been made concerning the great American
+novel. I have been told that it would come from the South, that it would
+come from the West, that it would never be written. But Mr. Wilson has a
+new and revolutionary theory.
+
+"Will there," I asked, "ever be the great American novel? That is, will
+there ever be a novel which reflects American life as adequately as
+_Vanity Fair_ reflects English life?"
+
+"There have already been dozens of them!" was Mr. Wilson's emphatic
+reply. "To go no farther back, Booth Tarkington wrote one the other day,
+and so did Theodore Dreiser. (Dreiser's story, 'The "Genius,"' of course
+couldn't have appeared in any American magazine. Trust your canny
+publisher not to let his magazine hand know what his book hand is
+doing!)
+
+"But let us lay forever that dear old question that has haunted our
+literary columns for so many years. The answer, of course, is that there
+is no novel that reflects English life any more adequately than _The
+Turmoil_, or '_The Genius_,' or _The Virginian_, or _Perch of the
+Devil_, or _Unleavened Bread_, or _The Rise of Silas Lapham_ reflects
+American life.
+
+"Certainly _Vanity Fair_ doesn't do this. It reflects but a very narrow
+section of London life. For the purposes of fictional portrayal England
+is just as big and difficult--as impossible in one novel--as the United
+States.
+
+"To know England through fiction one must go to all her artists, past
+and present, getting a little from each. Hardy gives us an England that
+Thackeray never suspected, and Galsworthy gives us still another, not to
+go on to the England of George Moore, Phillpotts, Quiller-Couch, Wells,
+Bennett, Walpole, George, or Mackenzie. I hope at the proper time that a
+tasteful little tablet will be erected to my memory for having laid this
+ancient and highly respectable apparition."
+
+In his interesting contribution to a symposium of opinions as to what
+are the six best novels in the English language, Mr. Wilson had some
+things to say about Dickens which were not likely to bring him a vote of
+thanks from the Dickens Fellowship. I wished to have his opinion of
+Dickens stated more definitely, and so, basing my question on a
+statement he had made in the symposium, I asked, "What qualities in the
+work of Charles Dickens make him a bad model for novelists to follow?"
+
+Mr. Wilson replied: "Dickens has been a blight to most writers who were
+susceptible to his vices. He was a great humorist, but an inferior
+novelist, and countless other inferior novelists have believed that they
+could be great humorists by following his childishly easy formula.
+
+"That is, those who were influenced by him copy his faults. Witness our
+school of characterization based on the Dickens method, a school holding
+that 'character' is a mere trick of giving your creation exaggerated
+mannerisms or physical surfaces--as with Dickens it was rarely anything
+else.
+
+"Dickens created vaudeville 'characters'--unsurpassed for twenty-minute
+sketches, deadly beyond that to the mentally mature. His stock in trade
+was the grotesque make-up. In stage talk he couldn't create a 'straight'
+part.
+
+"Strip his people of their make-ups, verbal, hirsute, sartorial,
+surgical, pathological, what not--and dummies remain. Meet them once and
+you know them for the rest of the tale, the Micawbers, Gamps,
+Pecksniffs, Nicklebys; each has his stunt and does it over and over at
+each new meeting, to the--for me, at least--maddening delay of the
+melodrama. I like melodrama as well as any one, badgered heroines,
+falsely accused heroes, missing wills, trap-doors, disguised
+philanthropists, foul murders, and even slow-dying children who are not
+only moralists, but orators; and I like to see the villain get his at
+last, and get it good; but I can't read Dickens any more, because the
+tale must be held up every five minutes for one of the funny
+'characters' to do his stunt.
+
+"How many years will it take us--writers, I mean--to realize that there
+are no characters in Dickens in the sense that Dmitri in _The Brothers
+Caramazov_ is a character? How few of our current novelists can
+distinguish between the soulless caricaturing of Dickens and the genuine
+character-drawing of a Turgenieff or a Dostoievski!
+
+"How few of us can see how the soul of Dmitri is slowly unfolded to the
+reader with never a bit of make-up! To this moment, I don't know if he
+wore a beard or not; but I know the man. Dickens would have given him
+funny whiskers, astigmatism, a shortened leg, a purple nose, and still
+to make sure we wouldn't mistake him a catch phrase for his utterance.
+
+"Any novelist who has mastered the rudiments of his craft, even though
+he hasn't an atom of humor in his make-up, can write a Dickens novel,
+and any publisher will print it for the Christmas trade if it's fairly
+workman-like, and it will be warmly praised in the reviews. That happens
+every season.
+
+"And that's why Dickens is a bad model. If one must have a model, why
+not Hall Caine, infinitely the superior of Dickens as a craftsman? Of
+course, having no humor, he can't be read by people who have, but he
+knows his trade, where Dickens was a preposterous blunderer."
+
+Charles Belmont Davis once told me that a novelist should have some
+other regular occupation besides writing. I asked Mr. Wilson his opinion
+on this subject.
+
+"Mr. Davis didn't originate this theory," he said. "It's older than he
+is. Anyway, I don't believe in it. I know of no business to-day that
+would leave a man time to write novels, and a novelist worth his salt
+won't have time for any other business.
+
+"Of course, the ideal novelist would at one time or another have been
+anything. The ideal novelist has two passions, people and words, and he
+should have had and should continue to have as many points of contact
+with life as possible. But if he has reached the point where he can
+write to please me, I want him not to waste time doing anything else.
+
+"Personally, I wish I might have been, for varying intervals, a Russian
+Grand Duke, an Eighth Avenue undertaker, the manager of a
+five-and-ten-cent store, a head waiter, a burglar, a desk sergeant at
+the Thirtieth Street Police Station, and a malefactor of great wealth,
+preferably one that gets into the snapshots at Newport, reading from
+left to right. But Heaven has denied me practically all of these avenues
+to a knowledge of my humankind, and I am too busy keeping up with the
+current styles of all millinery fiction to take to any of them at this
+late day.
+
+"Besides, I have a bad example to deter me, having just read _The High
+Priestess_, by Robert Grant, who has another business than novel
+writing--something connected with the law, I believe, in Boston. I have
+no means of knowing how valuable a civic unit he may have been in his
+home town, but I do feel that he has cheated the world of a great deal
+by keeping to this other business, whatever it may be.
+
+"From the author of _Unleavened Bread_ we once had a right to expect
+much. But _The High Priestess_ chiefly makes me regret that he didn't
+have to write novels or starve; by its virtues of construction, which
+are many and admirable, and by its utter lack of power to communicate
+any emotion whatsoever, which is conspicuous and lamentable. He seems to
+have written his novel with an adding-machine, and instinctively I
+blame that 'other business' of his, in which he seems to have
+forgotten--for he did know it once--that a novelist may or may not think
+straight, but he must feel.
+
+"Perhaps he wasn't a real novelist, after all. I suspect a real novelist
+would starve in any other business."
+
+I told Mr. Wilson that a prominent American humorist writer had classed
+Mark Twain with Artemus Ward and Philander Doesticks, and said that
+these men were not genuine humorists, but "the Charlie Chaplins of their
+time."
+
+Mr. Wilson smiled. "Isn't this rather high praise for Charlie Chaplin?"
+he asked. "How far is this idolatry of the movie actor to go, anyway?
+True, Mr. Chaplin is a skilled comedian, pre-eminent in his curious new
+profession, but to my thinking he lacks repose at those supreme moments
+when he is battering the faces of his fellow-histrions with the wet mop
+or the stuffed club, or walking on their stomachs; but I may be
+prejudiced. I know I shouldn't have ranked him with Mark Twain,
+arch-humanist and satirist and one of the few literary artists who have
+attained the world stature--so that we must go back and back to
+Cervantes to find his like."
+
+
+
+
+_THE PASSING OF THE SNOB_
+
+EDWARD S. MARTIN
+
+
+If William Makepeace Thackeray were alive to-day he would not write a
+_Book of Snobs_. He might write a _Book of Reformers_.
+
+This is the opinion of that shrewd and kindly satirist, Edward S.
+Martin. I found him not in New York, the city whose lights and shadows
+are reflected in much of his graceful prose and pungent verse, but out
+among the Connecticut hills. In the pleasant study of his quaint
+Colonial cottage he talked about the thing he delights to
+observe--humanity.
+
+"Thackeray would not write a _Book of Snobs_ to-day," he said. "The snob
+is not now the appealing subject that he was in the early days of the
+reign of Queen Victoria. Thackeray could not now find enough snobs and
+snobbery to write about, either in England or in America. Snobs are by
+way of having punctured tires these days.
+
+"Don't you think that the snobs were always very much apart from our
+civilization and national ideals? They were a symptom of an established
+and conservative society. And this established and conservative society
+Thackeray in his way helped to break down.
+
+"To-day, in England and in the United States, that kind of society is in
+a precarious condition. If Thackeray were now writing, he would not
+satirize snobs. It is more likely that he would satirize the reformers.
+I think that all the snobs have hit the sawdust trail."
+
+"How did this happen?" I asked. "What was it that did away with the
+snobs?"
+
+"It was largely a natural process of change," said Mr. Martin. "The
+snobs were put on the defensive. You see, there is a harder push of
+democracy now than there was in Thackeray's time. The world of which the
+snob was so conspicuous a part seems, especially since the war began, to
+have passed away. Of course the literature of that world is not dead,
+but for the moment it seems obsolete.
+
+"To-day the whole attention of civilized mankind is fixed on the great
+fundamental problems; there is no time for snobbery. For one thing,
+there is the problem of national self-preservation. And there has
+recently been before the civilized world, more strongly than ever
+before, the great problem of the development of democracy.
+
+"I suppose that the war will check, to a certain extent, the development
+of democracy. In England the great task of the hour is to organize all
+the powers of society for defense against attack, against attack by a
+power organized for forty years for that attack.
+
+"I suppose England will get organization out of this war. And if we get
+into the war, we'll get organization out of it."
+
+Mr. Martin is generally thought of as a critic of social rather than
+political conditions. But he is keenly interested in politics. Speaking
+of American politics and the possibility of America's entering the war,
+he said:
+
+"For the past fifteen years our greatest activity in politics has been
+to rip things open. It seemed to most people that the organization was
+getting too strong and that it was controlled by too few people. The
+fight has been against that condition.
+
+"But if we became involved in a serious war trouble the energy of our
+people would be directed to an attempt to secure increased efficiency.
+We would become closely organized again. I don't think we'd lose the
+benefit of what has been done in the past years, but we would come to a
+turn in the road.
+
+"I suppose it would bring us all together, if we got into this war, and
+I suppose we'd get some good out of it.
+
+"You see, the people who formerly directed our Government haven't had
+much power for several years. Now they are valuable people. And they
+will come back into power again, but with greatly modified conditions.
+
+"I don't think that a new set of people are going to manage the affairs
+of the nation. I think that the affairs of the nation will be managed by
+the people who managed them before. But these people will be much more
+under control than they were before, and they will be subject to new
+laws.
+
+"How much good government by commission is going to do I don't know. We
+have not as yet had good enough men to enter into this important work,
+and the best of those who have entered have not stayed in this
+employment. So the development of experts in government has not come
+along as well as people hoped it would."
+
+The genial philosopher smiled quizzically and rose from his chair.
+
+"I'm afraid I'm getting too political," he said, pacing slowly up and
+down the room. "Let's get back to snobs and snobbery.
+
+"You asked me a few minutes ago why the snob had become so inconspicuous
+a figure in our modern society. Well, I know one reason for this altered
+condition of affairs. Woman has abolished the snob. Woman has changed
+man."
+
+"And what changed woman?" I asked.
+
+"Many things; the development of machinery, for instance," he replied.
+"Woman has not changed so much as the conditions of life have changed.
+
+"The development of machinery has caused changes that impress me deeply.
+It has produced immense alterations in the conditions of life and in the
+relations between people.
+
+"War has been changed in a striking manner by this development of
+machinery. Never in the history of warfare was machinery so prominent
+and important as to-day. In fact, I think I am justified in speaking of
+this war as a machine-bore!
+
+"Machinery really has had a great deal to do with changing the
+condition and activities of woman, and has been a powerful influence in
+bringing about the modern movement for women's suffrage. Machinery has
+changed the employment of women and forced them into kinds of work which
+are not domestic.
+
+"The typewriter and the telephone have revolutionized our methods of
+doing business. The typewriter and the telephone have filled our offices
+with women. They are doing work which twenty years ago would have been
+considered most unfeminine.
+
+"The war is strengthening this tendency of women to take up work that is
+not domestic. I have heard it said that women first got into the
+undomestic kinds of business in France during the Napoleonic wars.
+Napoleon wanted to have all the men out in the line of battle, so he had
+girls instructed in bookkeeping and other kinds of office work.
+
+"The business activities of Frenchwomen date from that time. And a
+similar result seems to be coming out of this war. In France, in
+England, in all the countries engaged in the war the women are filling
+the positions left vacant by the men."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that this is a good thing for civilization,
+this increased activity of women in business?"
+
+"I don't know," said Mr. Martin, musingly. "I don't know. But I do know
+this, that the main employment of woman is to rear a family. Office
+work, administrative work--these things are of only secondary
+importance. The one vital thing for women to do is to rear families.
+They must do this if the human race is to continue."
+
+"Mr. Martin," I said, "you told me that Thackeray, if he were alive,
+would satirize the reformers. Just what sort of reformer is it that has
+taken the place of the snob?"
+
+Mr. Martin did not at once answer. He smiled, as if enjoying some
+entertaining memory. Then he started to speak, and mentioned the name of
+a prominent reformer. But his New England caution checked him. He said:
+
+"No, I'd better not say anything about that. I'd rather not. I'd rather
+say that the things that the snobs admired and particularly embodied
+have lost prestige during the last twenty years.
+
+"After 1898, after our great rise to prosperity, the captains of
+industry and of finance were the great men of the country. But I think
+these great men are less stunning now than they were then. And money is
+less stunning, too.
+
+"All the business of money-making has had a great loss of prestige since
+1900. People think more of other things. And the people who are thinking
+of other things than money-making have more of a 'punch' than they had
+before. The wise have more of a punch, and so have the foolish."
+
+Again came that reminiscent smile. "Reformers can be very trying," he
+said. "Very trying, indeed. Did you ever read Brand Whitlock's _Forty
+Years of It_? Brand Whitlock had his own trials with the reformers.
+Whitlock is a sensible, generous man, and his attitude toward reformers
+is a good deal humorous and not at all violent. That would be
+Thackeray's attitude toward them, I think, if he were living to-day.
+He'd satirize the reformers instead of the snobs."
+
+Mr. Martin is not inclined to condemn or to accept absolutely any of the
+modern reform movements. "All reform movements," he said, "run until
+they get a check. Then they stop. But what they have accomplished is not
+lost."
+
+The society women who undertake sociological reform work find in Mr.
+Martin no unsympathetic critic.
+
+"These wealthy women," he said, "take up reform work as a recourse.
+Society life is not very filling. They have a sense of emptiness. So
+they go in for reform, to fill out their lives more adequately.
+
+"But I don't know that I'd call that kind of thing reform. I'd call it a
+large form of social activity. These women are attending to a great mass
+of people who need this attention. But the bulk of this kind of work is
+too small for it to be called reform.
+
+"In New York there are very many young people who need care and
+leadership. The neglected and incompetent must be looked after. The
+old-fashioned family control has been considerably loosened, and an
+attempt must be made to guard those who are therefore less protected
+than they would have been a generation ago. Certainly these efforts to
+look after young people who don't have enough care taken of them by
+their families are directed in the right direction."
+
+I asked Mr. Martin what he thought of the present condition of American
+literature, particularly the work presented to the public on the pages
+of magazines.
+
+"Just now," he said, "the newspapers seem to have almost everything. The
+great interest of the last few years has been in the newspapers. They
+have had a tremendous story to tell, they have told it every day, and
+other things have seemed, in comparison, flat and lifeless.
+
+"It has been a hard time for every sort of a publication not absolutely
+up to the minute all the time. The newspapers have had the field almost
+to themselves.
+
+"And I think that the newspapers have greatly improved. They have had an
+immense chance, and it has been very stimulating."
+
+
+
+
+_COMMERCIALIZING THE SEX INSTINCT_
+
+ROBERT HERRICK
+
+
+"Realism," said Robert Herrick, "is not the celebration of sexuality." I
+had not recalled to earth that merry divine whose lyric invitation to go
+a-Maying still echoes in the heart of every lover of poetry. The Robert
+Herrick with whom I was talking is a poet and a discriminating critic of
+poetry, but the world knows him chiefly for his novels--_The Common
+Lot_, _Together_, _Clark's Field_, and other intimate studies of
+American life and character. He is a realist, and not many years ago
+there were critics who thought that his manner of dealing with sexual
+themes was dangerously frank. Therefore, the statement that he had just
+made seemed to me particularly significant.
+
+"It seems to have become the fashion," he said, "to apply the term
+Realist to every writer who is obsessed with sex. I think I know the
+reason for this. Our Anglo-Saxon prudery kept all mention of sex
+relations out of our fiction for many years. Among comparatively modern
+novelists the realists were the first to break the shackles of this
+convention, and write frankly of sex. And from this it has come, most
+unfortunately, that realism and pornography are often confused by
+novelists and critics as well as by the public.
+
+"This confusion of ideas was apparent in some of the criticisms of my
+novel _Together_. In an early chapter of the book there was an incident
+which was intended to show that the man and woman who were the chief
+figures in the book were spiritually incompatible, that their relations
+as husband and wife would be wrong. This was, in fact, the theme of the
+book, and this incident in the first chapter was intended to foreshadow
+the later events of their married life. Well, the critics who disliked
+this chapter said that what they objected to was its 'gross realism.'
+
+"Now, as a matter of fact, that part of the book was not realistic at
+all. I was describing something unusual, abnormal, while realism has to
+do with the normal. The critic had, of course, a perfect right to
+believe that the subject ought not to be treated at all, but 'gross
+realism' was the most inappropriate description possible.
+
+"Undoubtedly there are many writers who believe that they are realists
+because they write about nothing but sex. Undoubtedly, too, there are
+many writers who are conscious of the commercial value of sex in
+literature. Of course a writer ought to be conscious of the sex impulse
+in life, but he ought not to display it constantly. I wish our writers
+would pay less attention to the direct manifestations of sex and more to
+its indirect influence, to the ways in which it affects all phases of
+activity."
+
+"Who are some of the writers who seem to you to be especially ready to
+avail themselves of the commercial value of sex?" I asked.
+
+Mr. Herrick smiled. "I think you know the writers I mean without my
+mentioning their names," he said. "They write for widely circulated
+magazines, and make a great deal of money, and their success is due
+almost entirely to their industrious celebration of sexual affairs. You
+know the sort of magazine for which they write--it always has on the
+cover a highly colored picture of a pretty woman, never anything else.
+That, too, is an example, and a rather wearying example, of the
+commercializing of the sex appeal.
+
+"I think that Zola, although he was a great artist, was often conscious
+of the business value of the sex theme. He knew that that sort of thing
+had a tremendous appeal, and, for me, much of his best work is marred by
+his deliberate introduction of sex, with the purpose--which, of course,
+he realized--of making a sensation and selling large editions of his
+books. This sort of commercialism was not found in the great Russian
+realists, the true realist--Dostoievski, for example. But it is found in
+the work of some of the modern Russian writers who are incorrectly
+termed realists."
+
+"Mr. Herrick," I asked, "just what is a realist?"
+
+Mr. Herrick's youthful face, which contrasts strangely with his white
+hair, took on a thoughtful expression.
+
+"The distinction between realism and romanticism," he said, "is one of
+spirit rather than of method. The realist has before him an aim which is
+entirely different from that of the romanticist.
+
+"The realist writes a novel with one purpose in view. And that purpose
+is to render into written words the normal aspect of things.
+
+"The aim of the romanticist is entirely different. He is concerned only
+with things which are exciting, astonishing--in a word, abnormal.
+
+"I do not like literary labels, and I think that the names 'realist' and
+'romanticist' have been so much misused that they are now almost
+meaningless. The significance of the term changes from year to year; the
+realists of one generation are the romanticists of the next.
+
+"Bulwer Lytton was considered a realist in his day. But we think of him
+only as a sentimental and melodramatic romanticist whose work has no
+connection with real life.
+
+"Charles Dickens was considered a realist by the critics of his own
+generation, and it is probable that he considered himself a realist. But
+his strongest instinct was toward the melodramatic. He wrote chiefly
+about simple people, it is true, and chiefly about his own land and
+time. But the fact that a writer used his contemporaries as subjects
+does not make him a realist. Dickens's people were unusual; they were
+better or worse than most people, and they had extraordinary adventures;
+they did not lead the sort of life which most people lead. Therefore,
+Dickens cannot accurately be called a realist."
+
+"You called Dostoievski a realist," I said. "What writers who use the
+English language seem to you to deserve best the name of realist?"
+
+"I think," said Mr. Herrick, "that the most thoroughgoing realist who
+ever wrote in England was Anthony Trollope. _Barchester Towers_ and
+_Framley Parsonage_ are masterpieces of realism; they give a faithful
+and convincing picture of the every-day life of a section of English
+society with which their author was thoroughly familiar. Trollope
+reflected life as he saw it--normal life. He was a great realist.
+
+"In the United States there has been only one writer who has as great a
+right to the name realist as had Anthony Trollope. That man is William
+Dean Howells. Mr. Howells has always been interested in the normal
+aspect of things. He has taken for his subject a sort of life which he
+knows intimately; he has not sought for extraordinary adventures for his
+theme, nor has he depicted characters remote from our experience. His
+novels are distinguished by such fidelity to life that he has an
+indisputable claim to be called a realist.
+
+"But, as I said, it is dangerous and unprofitable to attempt to label
+literary artists. Thackeray was a realist. Yet _Henry Esmond_ is classed
+as a romantic novel. In that book Thackeray used the realistic method;
+he spent a long time in studying the manners and customs of the time
+about which he was writing; and all the details of the sort of life
+which he describes are, I believe, historically accurate. And yet _Henry
+Esmond_ is a romance from beginning to end; it is a romantic novel
+written by a realist, and written according to what is called the
+realistic method.
+
+"On the other hand, Sir Walter Scott was a romanticist. No one will deny
+that. Yet in many of his early books he dealt with what may be called
+realistic material; he described with close fidelity to detail a sort of
+life and a sort of people with which he was well acquainted.
+
+"Whether a writer is a realist or a romanticist is, after all, I think,
+partly a matter of accident or culture. I happen to be a realist because
+I was brought up on the great Russian realists like Gogol and the great
+English realists from George Elliot down to Thomas Hardy. If I had been
+brought up on romantic writers I suppose that I might now be writing an
+entirely different sort of novel from that with which I am associated.
+
+"There is a sounder distinction," said Mr. Herrick, "than that which
+people try to draw between the realistic novel and the romantic novel.
+This is the distinction between the novel of character and the novel of
+events. Personally, I never have been able to see how the development of
+character can be separated from the plot of a novel. A book in which the
+characters exhibit exactly the same characteristics, moral and
+intellectual, in the last chapter as in the first, seems to me to be
+utterly worthless.
+
+"I will, however, make one exception--that is, the novel of the Jules
+Verne type. In this sort of book, and in romances of the Monte Cristo
+kind, action is the only thing with which the author and the reader are
+concerned, and any attempt to develop character would clog the wheels of
+the story.
+
+"But every other kind of novel depends on character. Even in the best
+work of Dumas, in _The Three Musketeers_, for example, the characters of
+the principal figures develop as the story progresses.
+
+"The highest interest of a novel depends upon the development of its
+characters. If the characters are static, then the book is feeble. I
+have never been able to see how the plot and the development of the
+characters can be separated.
+
+"Of course, the novel of character is full of adventure. The adventures
+of Henry James's characters are of absorbing interest, but they are
+psychological adventures, internal adventures. If some kind person
+wanted to give one of Henry James's novels what is commonly called 'a
+bully plot' the novel would fail."
+
+As to the probable effect on literature of the war, Mr. Herrick has a
+theory different from that of any other writer with whom I have
+discussed the subject.
+
+"I think," he said, "that after the war we shall return to fatuous
+romanticism and weak sentimentality in literature. The tendency will be
+to read novels in order to forget life, instead of reading them to
+realize life. There will be a revival of a deeper religious sense,
+perhaps, but there will also be a revival of mere empty formalism in
+religion. It has been so in the past after great convulsions. Men need
+time to recover their spiritual pride, their interest in ideas."
+
+But Mr. Herrick's own reaction to the war does not seem to justify his
+pessimistic prophecy. Certainly the personal experience which he next
+narrated to me does not indicate that Mr. Herrick is growing sentimental
+and romantic.
+
+"When I was in Rome recently," he said, "I was much impressed by
+D'Annunzio. I was interested in him as a problem, as a picturesque
+literary personality, as a decadent raffine type regenerated by the war.
+I have not read any of his books for many years.
+
+"I took some of D'Annunzio's books to read on my voyage home. I read _Il
+Piacere_. I realized its charm, I realized the highly aesthetic quality
+of its author, a scholarly and exact aestheticism as well as an emotional
+aestheticism. But, nevertheless, I had to force myself to read the book.
+It was simply a description of a young man's amorous adventures. And I
+could not see any reason for the existence of this carefully written
+record of passional experiences.
+
+"It seemed to me that the war had swept this sort of thing aside, or had
+swept aside my interest in this sort of thing. The book seemed to me as
+dull and trivial and as remote as a second-rate eighteenth-century
+novel. And I wondered if we would ever again return to the time when
+such a record of a young man's emotional and sensual experiences would
+be worth while.
+
+"I came to the conclusion that D'Annunzio himself would not now write
+such a novel. I think that it would seem to him to be too trivial a
+report on life. I think that the war has so forced the essential things
+of life upon the attention of young men."
+
+
+
+
+_SIXTEEN DON'TS FOR POETS_
+
+ARTHUR GUITERMAN
+
+
+Arthur Guiterman has been called the Owen Seaman of America. Of course
+he isn't, any more than Owen Seaman is the Arthur Guiterman of England.
+But the verse which brings Arthur Guiterman his daily bread is turned no
+less deftly than is that of _Punch's_ famous editor. Arthur Guiterman is
+not a humorist who writes verse; he is a poet with an abundant gift of
+humor.
+
+Now, the author of _The Antiseptic Baby and the Prophylactic Pup_ and
+_The Quest of the Riband_, and of those unforgetable rhymed reviews,
+differs from most other poets not only in possessing an abnormally
+developed sense of humor, but also in being able to make a comfortable
+living out of the sale of his verse. But when he talked to me recently
+he was by no means inclined to advise all able young poets to expect
+their poetry to provide them with board and lodging.
+
+"Of course it is possible to make a living out of verse," he said. "Walt
+Mason does, and so does Berton Braley. And now most of my income comes
+from my verse. Formerly I wrote short stories, but I haven't written one
+for seven or eight years.
+
+"Nevertheless, I think it is inadvisable for any one to set out with the
+idea of depending on the sale of verse as a means of livelihood. You
+see, there are, after all, two forms, and only two forms, of literary
+expression--the prose form and the verse form. Some subjects suit the
+prose form, others suit the verse form. Any one who makes writing his
+profession has ideas severally adapted to both of these forms. And every
+writer should be able to express his idea in whichever of these two
+forms suits it better.
+
+"Now, the verse form is older than the prose form. And so I have come to
+look upon it as the form peculiarly attractive to youth. Many writers
+outgrew the tendency to use the verse form, but some never outgrew it.
+Sir Walter Scott was a verse-writer before he was a prose-writer, and so
+was Shakespeare. So were many modern writers--Robert W. Chambers, for
+example.
+
+"This theory is true especially in regard to lyric verse. The lyric is
+nearly always the work of a young man. As a man grows older he sings
+less and preaches more. Certainly this was true of Milton.
+
+"I never thought that I should write verse for a living. But verse
+happens to be the medium that I love. I ran across my first poem the
+other day--it was about fireflies, and I was eight years old when I
+wrote it. Certainly nearly all writers write verse before they write
+prose; perhaps it is atavistic. I don't know that Henry James began with
+verse. But I would be willing to bet that he did.
+
+"One trouble with a great many people who make a living out of writing
+verse is that they feel obliged always to be verse-writers, never to
+write prose, even when the subject demands that medium. Alfred Noyes
+gives us an example of this unfortunate tendency in his _Drake_. I am
+not disparaging Alfred Noyes's work; he has written charming lyrics, but
+in _Drake_, and perhaps in some of the _Tales from the Mermaid Tavern_,
+I feel that he has written verse not because the subject was especially
+suited to that medium, but because he felt that he was a verse-writer
+and therefore should not write prose."
+
+Mr. Guiterman is firmly convinced, however, that a verse-writer ought to
+be able, in time, to make a living out of his work.
+
+"If a man calls himself a writer," he said, "he ought to be able to make
+a living out of writing. And I think that the writer of verse has a
+greater opportunity to-day than ever before. I don't mean to say that
+the appreciation of poetry is more intense than ever before, but it is
+more general. More people are reading poetry now than in bygone
+generations.
+
+"Compare with the traditions that we have to-day those of the early
+nineteenth century, of the time of Byron and Sir Walter Scott. Then
+books of verse sold in large quantities, it is true, but to a relatively
+small public, to one class of readers. Now not only the poet, but also
+the verse-writer has an enormous public. If a really great poet should
+arise to-day he would find awaiting him a larger public than that known
+by any poet of the past. But it would be necessary for the poet to be
+great for him to find this public. Byron would be more generally
+appreciated to-day, if he were to live again, than he was in his own
+generation. I mention Byron because I think it probable that the next
+great poet will have something of Byron's dynamic quality."
+
+"Who was the last great poet?" I asked.
+
+"How is one to decide whether or not a poet is great?" asked Mr.
+Guiterman in turn. "My own feeling is that the late William Vaughn Moody
+was a great poet in the making. Perhaps he never really fulfilled his
+early promise; perhaps he went back to the themes of bygone ages too
+much in finding themes for his poetry. It may be that the next really
+great poet will sing an entirely different strain; it may be that I will
+be one of those who will say that his work is all bosh.
+
+"But at any rate, he won't be an imitation Whitman or anything of that
+sort. He won't be any special school, nor will he think that he is
+founding a school. But it may be that his admirers will found a school
+with him as its leader, and they may force him to take himself
+seriously, and thus ruin himself."
+
+Returning to the subject of the advisability of a writer being able to
+express himself in verse as well as in prose, Mr. Guiterman said:
+
+"Especially in our generation is it true that good verse requires
+extreme condensation. In most work to-day brevity is desirable. The
+epigram beats the epic. If Milton were living to-day he would not write
+epics. I don't think it improbable that we have men with Miltonic minds,
+and they are not writing epics.
+
+"If a man finds that he cannot express his idea in verse more forcefully
+than he can in prose, then he ought to write prose. Very often a writer
+is interested in some little incident which he would not be justified in
+treating in prose, something too slight to be the theme of a short
+story. This is the sort of thing which he should put into verse. There
+is Leigh Hunt's _Jennie Kissed Me_, for example. Suppose he had made a
+short story of it."
+
+Thinking of this poet's financial success, I asked him just what course
+he would advise a young poet to pursue who had no means of livelihood
+except writing.
+
+"Well, the worst thing for him to do," said Mr. Guiterman, "would be to
+devote all his attention to writing an epic. He'd starve to death.
+
+"I suppose the best thing for him to do would be to write on as many
+subjects as possible, including those of intense interest to himself.
+What interests him intensely is sure to interest others, and the number
+of others whom it interests will depend on how close he is by nature to
+the mind of his place and time. He should get some sort of regular work
+so that he need not depend at first upon the sale of his writings. This
+work need not necessarily be literary in character, although it would be
+advisable for him to get employment in a magazine or newspaper office,
+so that he may get in touch with the conditions governing the sale of
+manuscripts.
+
+"He should write on themes suggested by the day's news. He should write
+topical verse; if there is a political campaign on, he should write
+verse bearing upon that; if a great catastrophe occurs, he should write
+about that, but he must not write on these subjects in a commonplace
+manner.
+
+"He should send his verses to the daily papers, for they are the
+publications most interested in topical verse. But also he should
+attempt to sell his work to the magazines, which pay better prices than
+the newspapers. If it is in him to do so, he should write humorous
+verse, for there is always a good market for humorous verse that is
+worth printing. He should look up the publishers of holiday cards, and
+submit to them Christmas, Thanksgiving, and Easter verses, for which he
+would receive, probably, about five dollars apiece. He should write
+advertising verses, and he should, perhaps, make an alliance with some
+artist with whom he can work, each supplementing the work of the other."
+
+"Mr. Guiterman," I said, "is this the advice that you would give to John
+Keats if he were to ask you?"
+
+"Yes, certainly," said Mr. Guiterman. "But you understand that our
+hypothetical poet must all the time be doing his own work, writing the
+sort of verse which he specially desires to write. If his pot-boiling is
+honestly done, it will help him with his other work.
+
+"He must study the needs and limitations of the various publications. He
+must recognize the fact that just because he has certain powers it does
+not follow that everything he writes will be desired by the editors.
+Marked ability and market ability are different propositions.
+
+"If he finds that the magazines are not printing sad sonnets, he must
+not write sad sonnets. He must adapt himself to the demands of the day.
+
+"There is high precedent for this course. You asked if I would give
+this advice to the young Keats. Why not, when Shakespeare himself
+followed the line of action of which I spoke? He began as a lyric poet,
+a writer of sonnets. He wrote plays because he saw that the demand was
+for plays, and because he wanted to make a living and more than a
+living. But because he was Shakespeare his plays are what they are.
+
+"The poet must be influenced by the demand. There is inspiration in the
+demand. Besides the material reward, the poet who is influenced by the
+demand has the encouraging, inspiring knowledge that he is writing
+something that people want to read."
+
+I asked Mr. Guiterman to give me a list of negative commandments for the
+guidance of aspiring poets. Here it is:
+
+"Don't think of yourself as a poet, and don't dress the part.
+
+"Don't classify yourself as a member of any special school or group.
+
+"Don't call your quarters a garret or a studio.
+
+"Don't frequent exclusively the company of writers.
+
+"Don't think of any class of work that you feel moved to do as either
+beneath you or above you.
+
+"Don't complain of lack of appreciation. (In the long run no really good
+published work can escape appreciation.)
+
+"Don't think you are entitled to any special rights, privileges, and
+immunities as a literary person, or have any more reason to consider
+your possible lack of fame a grievance against the world than has any
+shipping-clerk or traveling-salesman.
+
+"Don't speak of poetic license or believe that there is any such thing.
+
+"Don't tolerate in your own work any flaws in rhythm, rhyme, melody, or
+grammar.
+
+"Don't use 'e'er' for 'ever,' 'o'er' for 'over,' 'whenas' or 'what time'
+for 'when,' or any of the 'poetical' commonplaces of the past.
+
+"Don't say 'did go' for 'went,' even if you need an extra syllable.
+
+"Don't omit articles or prepositions for the sake of the rhythm.
+
+"Don't have your book published at your own expense by any house that
+makes a practice of publishing at the author's expense.
+
+"Don't write poems about unborn babies.
+
+"Don't--don't write hymns to the great god Pan. He is dead; let him rest
+in peace!
+
+"Don't write what everybody else is writing."
+
+
+
+
+_MAGAZINES CHEAPEN FICTION_
+
+GEORGE BARR McCUTCHEON
+
+
+Why is the modern American novel inferior to the modern English novel?
+Of course, there are some patriotic critics who believe that it is not
+inferior. But most readers of fiction speak of H. G. Wells and Compton
+Mackenzie, for example, with a respect and admiration which they do not
+extend to living American novelists.
+
+Why is this? Is it because of snobbishness or literary colonialism on
+the part of the American public? George Barr McCutcheon does not think
+so. The author of _Beverly of Graustark_ and many another popular
+romance believes that there is in America a force definitely harmful to
+the novel. And that force is the magazine.
+
+"The development of the magazine," he said to me, "has affected fiction
+in two ways. It has made it cheap and yet expensive, if you know what I
+mean.
+
+"Novels written solely with the view to sensationalism are more than
+likely to bring discredit, not upon the magazine, but upon the writer.
+He gets his price, however, and the public gets its fiction.
+
+"In my humble opinion, a writer should develop and complete his novel
+without a thought of its value or suitability to serial purposes. He
+should complete it to his own satisfaction--if that is possible--before
+submitting it to either editor or publisher. They should not be
+permitted to see it until it is in its complete form."
+
+"But you yourself write serial stories, do you not?" I asked.
+
+"I have never written a serial," answered Mr. McCutcheon. "Some of my
+stories have been published serially, but they were not written as
+serials.
+
+"I am quite convinced in my own mind that if we undertake to analyze the
+distinction between the first-class English writers of to-day and many
+of our Americans, we will find that their superiority resolves itself
+quite simply into the fact that they do not write their novels as
+serials. In other words, they write a novel and not a series of
+chapters, parts, and instalments."
+
+"Do you think that the American novel will always be inferior to the
+English novel?" I asked. "Is it not probable that the American novel
+will so develop as to escape the effects of serialization?"
+
+"There is no reason," Mr. McCutcheon replied, "why Americans should not
+produce novels equal to those of the English, provided the same care is
+exercised in the handling of their material, and that they make haste as
+slowly as possible. Just so long, however, as we are menaced by the
+perils of the serial our general output will remain inferior to that of
+England.
+
+"I do not mean to say that we have no writers in this country who are
+the equals in every respect of the best of the English novelists. We
+have some great men and women here, sincere, earnest workers who will
+not be spoiled."
+
+Mr. McCutcheon has no respect for the type of novel, increasingly
+popular of late, in which the author devotes page after page to glowing
+accounts of immorality with the avowed intention of teaching a high
+moral lesson. He has little faith in the honesty of purpose of the
+authors of works of this sort.
+
+"The so-called sex novel," he said, "is one of our gravest fatalities. I
+may be wrong, but I am inclined to think that most novels of that
+character are written, not from an aesthetic point of view, but for the
+somewhat laudable purpose of keeping the wolf from the door and at the
+same time allowing the head of the family to ride in an automobile of
+his own.
+
+"The typical serial writer is animated by the desire, or perhaps it is
+an obligation, to make the 'suspended interest' paramount to all else.
+This interest must not be allowed to flag between instalments.
+
+"The keen desire for thrills must be gratified at all costs. It is
+commanded by the editor--and I do not say that the editor errs. His
+public expects it in a serial. It must not be disappointed."
+
+I asked Mr. McCutcheon if he believed that a writer could produce
+sensational and poorly constructed fiction in order to make a living and
+yet keep his talent unimpaired; if a writer was justified in writing
+trash in order to gain leisure for serious work. He replied:
+
+"There are writers to-day who persist in turning out what they
+vaingloriously describe as 'stuff to meet the popular demand.' They
+invariably or inevitably declare that some day they will 'be in a
+position to write the sort of stuff they want to write.'
+
+"These writers say, in defense of their position, that they are not even
+trying to do their best work, that they are merely biding their time,
+and that--some day! I very much doubt their sincerity, or, at any rate,
+their capacity for self-analysis. I believe that when an author sets
+himself down to write a book (I refer to any author of recognized
+ability), he puts into that book the best that is in him at the time.
+
+"It is impossible for a good, conscientious writer to work on a plane
+lower than his best. Only hack writers can do such things.
+
+"There is not one of us who does not do his best when he undertakes to
+write his book. We only confess that we have not done our best when a
+critic accuses us of pot-boiling, and so forth. Then we rise in our
+pride and say, 'Oh, well, I can do better work than this, and they know
+it.'
+
+"It is true that we may not be doing the thing that we really want to
+do, but I am convinced that we are unconsciously doing our best, just
+the same. It all resolves itself into this statement--a good workman
+cannot deliberately do a poor piece of work.
+
+"I am free to confess that I have done my very best in everything I have
+undertaken. It may fall short of excellence as viewed from even my own
+viewpoint, but it is the best I know how to do.
+
+"So you may take it from me that the writer who declares that he is
+going to do something really worth while, just as soon as he gets
+through doing the thing that the public expects him to do, is deceiving
+himself and no one else. An author cannot stand still in his work. He
+either progresses or retrogrades, and no man progresses except by means
+of steady improvement. He cannot say, 'I will write a poor book this
+year and a great book next year.'"
+
+Mr. McCutcheon is so unashamedly a romanticist that I expected to find
+him an enthusiastic partisan of the first and greatest master of the
+romantic novel in English. But, to my surprise, he said:
+
+"I suppose the world has outgrown Sir Walter Scott's novels. It is quite
+natural that it should. The world is older and conditions have changed.
+The fairest simile I can offer in explanation is that as man himself
+grows older he loses, except in a too frequently elastic memory, his
+interest in the things that moved him when he was a boy."
+
+But while Mr. McCutcheon believes (in defiance of the opinion of the
+publishers who continue to bring out, year by year, their countless new
+editions of the Waverley Novels in all the languages of the civilized
+world) that the spell of the Wizard of the North has waned, he
+nevertheless believes that the romantic novel has lost none of its
+ancient appeal.
+
+"I do not believe," he said, "that the vogue of the romantic novel, or
+tale (which is a better word for describing the sort of fiction covered
+by this generic term), will ever die. The present war undoubtedly will
+alter the trend of the modern romantic fiction, but it will not in
+effect destroy it."
+
+"How will it alter it?" I asked.
+
+"Years most certainly will go by," he replied, "before the novelist may
+even hope to contend with the realities of this great and most
+unromantic conflict. Kings and courtiers are very ordinary, and, in some
+cases, ignoble creatures in these days, and none of them appears to be
+romantic.
+
+"We find a good many villains among our erstwhile heroes, and a good
+many heroes among our principal villains. People will not care to read
+war novels for a good many years to come, but it is inevitable that
+future generations will read even the lightest kind of fiction dealing
+with this war, horrible though it is. Just so long as the world exists
+there will be people who read nothing else but the red-blood, stirring
+romantic stories.
+
+"There exists, of course, a class of readers who will not be tempted by
+the romantic, who will not even tolerate it, because they cannot
+understand it. That class may increase, but so will its antithesis.
+
+"I know a man who has read the Bible through five or six times, not
+because he is of a religious turn of mind or even mildly devout, but
+because there is a lot of good, sound, exciting romance in it! A man who
+is without romance in his soul has no right to beget children, for he
+cannot love them as they ought to be loved. They represent romance at
+its best. He is, therefore, purely selfish in his possession of them."
+
+Mr. McCutcheon had spoken of the probable effect of the war on the
+popular taste for romantic fiction. I reminded him of William Dean
+Howells's much-quoted statement, "War stops literature."
+
+"War stops everything else," said Mr. McCutcheon, "so why not
+literature? It stops everything, I amend, except bloodshed, horror, and
+heartache.
+
+"And when the war itself is stopped, you will find that literature will
+be revived with farming and other innocent and productive industries. I
+venture to say that some of the greatest literature the world has ever
+known is being written to-day. Out of the history of this titanic
+struggle will come the most profound literary expressions of all time,
+and from men who to-day are unknown and unconsidered."
+
+I asked Mr. McCutcheon if he did not believe that the youthful energy of
+the United States was likely to make its citizens impatient of romance,
+that quality being generally considered the exclusive property of
+nations ancient in civilization. He did not think so.
+
+"America," he said, "is essentially a romantic country, our great and
+profound commercialism to the contrary notwithstanding. America was born
+of adventure; its infancy was cradled in romance; it has grown up in
+thrills. And while to-day it may not reflect romance as we are prone to
+consider it, there still rests in America a wonderful treasure in the
+shape of undeveloped possibilities.
+
+"We are, first of all, an eager, zestful, imaginative people. We are
+creatures of romance. We do two things exceedingly well--we dream and
+we perform.
+
+"Our dreams are of adventure, of risk, of chance, of impossibilities,
+and of deeds that only the bold may conceive. And we find on waking from
+these dreams that we have performed the deeds we dreamed of.
+
+"The Old World looks upon us as braggarts. Perhaps we are, but we are
+kindly, genial, smiling braggarts--and the braggart is, after all, our
+truest romanticist.
+
+"I like to hear a grown man admit that he still believes in fairies.
+That sort of man thinks of the things that are beautiful, even though
+they are invisible. And--if you stop to think about it--the most
+beautiful things in the world are invisible."
+
+
+
+
+_BUSINESS INCOMPATIBLE WITH ART_
+
+FRANK H. SPEARMAN
+
+
+The late J. Pierpont Morgan writing sonnet sequences, Rockefeller
+regarding oil as useful only when mixed with pigment and spread upon
+canvas by his own deft hand, Carnegie designing libraries instead of
+paying for them--these are some of the entertaining visions that occur
+to the mind of Frank H. Spearman when he contemplates in fancy a
+civilization in which business no longer draws the master minds away
+from art.
+
+I asked the author of _Nan of Music Mountain_ if he thought that the
+trend of present-day American life--its commercialism and
+materialism--affected the character of our literature. He replied:
+
+"Let us take commercialism first: By it you mean the pursuit of
+business. Success in business brings money, power, and that public
+esteem we may loosely term fame--the admiration of our fellow-men and
+the sense of power among them.
+
+"Commercialism, thus defined, affects the character of our literature in
+a way that none of our students of the subject seems to have
+apprehended. We live in an atmosphere of material striving. Our great
+rewards are material successes. The extremely important consequence is
+that our business life through its greater temptations--through its
+being able to offer the rewards of wealth and mastery and esteem--robs
+literature and the kindred arts of our keenest minds. We have, it is
+true, eminent doctors and lawyers, but the complaint that commercialism
+has invaded these professions only proves that they depend directly on
+business prosperity for a substantial portion of their own rewards.
+
+"I am not forgetting the crust and garret as the traditional setting for
+the literary genius; but, when this state of affairs existed, the genius
+had no chance to become a business millionaire within ten years--or, for
+that matter, within a hundred. And while poverty provides an excellent
+foundation for a career, it is not so good as a superstructure--at
+least, not outside the ranks of the heroic few who renounce riches for
+spiritual things.
+
+"More than once," continued Mr. Spearman, "in meeting men among our
+masters of industry, I have been struck by the thought that these are
+the men who should be writing great books, painting great pictures, and
+building great cathedrals; their tastes, I have sometimes found, run in
+these directions quite as strongly as the tastes of lesser men who give
+themselves to literature, painting, or architecture. But the present-day
+market for cathedrals is somewhat straitened, and a great ambition may
+nowadays easily neglect the prospective rewards of literature for those
+of steel-making.
+
+"Business success--not achieved in literature and the arts--comes first
+with us; in consequence, the ranks of those who follow these professions
+are robbed of the intellect that should contribute to them. This is the
+real way in which commercialism--our pursuit of business--affects our
+literature. It depletes, too, in the same way, the quality of men in our
+public life.
+
+"Charles G. Dawes has called my attention more than once to the falling
+off in caliber among men from whose ranks our politicians and public men
+are drawn. It is not that our present administration is so conspicuously
+weak; go to any of the Presidential conventions this year and note the
+falling off in quality among the politicians. In one generation the
+change has been startling. The sons of the men that loomed large in
+public life twenty-five years ago to-day are masters of business.
+
+"Business takes everything. We have had really magnificent financiers,
+such as the elder Morgan, who should be our Michael Angelo. I have known
+railroad executives who might have been distinguished novelists, and
+bankers who would have been great artists were the American people as
+obsessed with the painting of pictures and the making of statues as
+those of Europe once were.
+
+"In Michael Angelo's day public interest in solving problems in
+manufacture and transportation did not overshadow that in painting and
+sculpture. Leonardo in our day would be building railroads, digging
+canals, or inventing the aeroplane--and doing better, perhaps, at these
+things than any man living; he came perilously close to doing all of
+them in his own day.
+
+"Before you can bring our steel-founders and business men into
+literature you must make success in literature and its kindred arts
+esteemed as the greatest reward. As it is, I fear it is likely to be
+chiefly those who through lack of capacity, inclination, or robust
+health are unequal to the heat and burden of great business that will be
+left for the secondary callings, among which we must at present rank
+literature. It would be interesting, too, to consider to what extent
+this movement of men toward business rewards has been compensated for by
+the opportunities afforded to women in the field thus deserted; we
+certainly have many clever women cultivating it."
+
+"But what," I asked, "about materialism--not specifically commercialism,
+but materialism? Do you think that its evil effects are evident in
+contemporary literature?"
+
+"Materialism--you mean the philosophy--has quite a different effect on
+any literature--a poisonous, a baneful effect, rather than a merely
+harmful one," Mr. Spearman answered. "Can you possibly have, at any time
+or anywhere, great art without a great faith? Since the era of
+Christianity, at any rate, it seems to me that periods of faith, or at
+least periods enjoying the reflexes and echoes of faith, have afforded
+the really nourishing atmosphere for artistic development. Spirituality
+provides that which the imagination may seize upon for the substance of
+its creative effort; without spirituality the imagination shrivels, and
+the materialist, while losing none of his characteristic confidence,
+shrinks continually to punier artistic stature."
+
+Something in what Mr. Spearman had said reminded me of Henry Holt's
+criticisms of the modern magazines. So I asked Mr. Spearman what effect
+the development of the American magazine, with its high prices for
+serials and series of stories, had had upon our fiction. He answered:
+
+"Good, I think. Our fiction must compete in its rewards with those of
+business. One of the rewards of either--even if you put it, in the first
+case, the lowest--is the monetary reward, and the more substantial that
+can be made, the more chance fiction will have of holding up its head.
+
+"I have had occasion to watch pretty closely the development of the
+inclinations and ambitions of a number of average American boys--boys
+that have had fairly intimate opportunities to consider both literature
+and business. I have been startled more than once to find that as each
+of them came along and was asked what he wanted to do, the substance of
+his answer has been, 'Something to make money.'
+
+"If you question your own youthful acquaintances, you will receive in
+most cases, I dare say, similar answers. I am afraid if Giotto had been
+a Wyoming shepherd-boy he would want to be a steel-maker. Anything that
+tends to attract the young to the pursuit of literature as a calling
+strengthens our fiction, and the magazine should have credit for an
+'assist' in this direction. Don't forget, of course, that the magazine
+itself derives directly, by way of advertising, from business."
+
+"Do you think, then," I asked, "that our writers are producing work as
+likely to endure as that which is being produced in England?"
+
+Mr. Spearman smiled whimsically. "Your question suggests to me," he
+replied, "rather than any judgment in the case, the reflection that the
+average English writer has possessed over our average American writer
+the very great advantage of an opportunity to become really educated; to
+this extent their equipment is appreciably stronger than ours. If you
+will read the ordinary run of English fiction or play-writing and
+compare it with similar work of ours, you cannot fail to note the better
+finish in their work. And in expressing a conviction that our writers
+are somewhat handicapped as to this factor in their equipment, I do not
+indict them for wasted opportunities; I indict our own substantial
+failure in educational methods. For a generation or more we have
+experimented, and from the very first grade in our grammar-schools up to
+the university courses there have resulted confusion and ineptitude. I
+instance specifically our experimentation with electives and our
+widespread contempt for the classics. To attempt to master any of the
+arts and not to be intimately familiar with what the Greeks and the
+Romans have left us of their achievement--not to speak of those, to us,
+uncharted seas of medieval achievement in every direction following the
+twelfth century--is to make the effort under a distinct disadvantage.
+
+"The average English writer has had much more of this intimacy, or at
+least a chance at much more of it, than the average American writer. In
+the sphere of literary criticism I have heard Mr. Brownell speak of the
+better quality of even the anonymous English literary criticism so
+frequently to be found in their journals when compared with similar
+American work. There is only one explanation for these things, and it
+lies in the training. All of this not implying, in indirect answer to
+your question, that the English writer is to bear away the prize in the
+competition for literary permanence. American Samsons may, despite
+everything, burst their bonds; but if they win it will often be without
+what their teachers should have supplied.
+
+"Mr. Brownell, in his definitive essay on Cooper, in comparing the
+material at Balzac's hand with that at Cooper's, remarks on the fact
+that Cooper's background was essentially nature. 'Nothing, it is true,
+is more romantic than nature,' adds Mr. Brownell, 'except nature plus
+man. But the exception is prodigious.' Europe measures behind her
+writers almost three thousand years of man.
+
+"We have in this country no atmosphere of Christian tradition such as
+that which pervades Europe--English-speaking people parted with historic
+Christianity before they came here. But, willingly or unwillingly, the
+English and the Continental writers are saturated with this magnificent
+background of Christianity--they can't escape it. And what I note as
+striking evidence of the value to them of this brooding spirit of twenty
+European centuries is the fact that their very pagans choose Christian
+material to work with. Goethe himself, fine old pagan that he was,
+turned to Christian quarries for his _Faust_. The minor pagans turn in
+likewise, though naturally with slighter results. But to all of them,
+Christianity, paraphrasing Samson, might well say: 'If ye had not plowed
+with my heifer, ye had not read--your own riddle of longed-for
+recognition.'"
+
+"Why is it that the art of fiction is no longer taken as seriously as it
+was, for example, in the time of Sir Walter Scott?"
+
+"I don't know how seriously," countered Mr. Spearman, "you mean your
+question to be taken. It suggests that in the day of Walter Scott the
+field of novel-writing was still so new that only bolder spirits
+ventured into it. It was not a day when the many could attempt the novel
+with any assurances of success in marketing their wares. In consequence
+we got then the work of only big men and women. Pioneers--though not
+necessarily respectable--are a hardy lot.
+
+"Still--touching on your other question about the great American
+novel--if I wished to develop great musicians I should start every one
+possible at studying music, and I can't help thinking that the more
+there are among us who attempt novels the greater probability there will
+be for the production of a masterpiece. A man's mind is a mine. Neither
+he nor any one else knows what is in it. Possessing the property in fee
+simple, he has, of course, certain valuable proprietary rights. But the
+only way I know of to find out to a certainty just what lies within the
+property is persistently to tunnel and drift, or, as Mr. Brownell says,
+'to get out what is in you.' And I am in complete accord with him in the
+belief that temperament is the best possible endowment for a
+novelist--and temperament comes, if you are a Christian, from God; if a
+pagan, from the gods."
+
+Mr. Spearman returned to his theme of the effect of materialism on
+literature in the course of a discussion of the French novel of the day
+as compared to the novel of Zola and his imitators. He said:
+
+"I think the important thing for Zola was that his day coincided with a
+materialistic ascendency in the thought of France. He lived at a time
+admirably suited to a man of his type. Zola found a France weak and
+contemptible in its government, and in consequence a soil in which
+grossness could profitably be cultivated.
+
+"He was by no means a great artist; he was merely a writer writhing for
+recognition when he turned to filth. He took it up to commercialize it,
+to turn it into money and reputation. Men such as he are continually, at
+different times and in different countries, lifting their heads. But
+unless they are sustained by what chances to be a loose public attitude
+on questions of decency, they are clubbed into silence.
+
+"And just why should the exploitation of filth assume to monopolize the
+word 'realism'? To define precisely what realism should include and
+exclude would call for hard thinking. But it doesn't take much thought
+to reach the conclusion that mere annalists of grossness have no proper
+monopoly of the term. Grossness is no adequate foundation for a literary
+monument; it is not even a satisfactory corner-stone. The few writers
+one thinks of that constitute exceptions would have left a better
+monument without it.
+
+"But if you wish to realize how fortunate Zola was in coinciding with a
+period when the chief effort of the ruling spirits of France was to war
+on all forces that strove to conserve decency, try to imagine what sort
+of a reception _L'Assommoir_ would be accorded to-day by the tears of
+France stricken through calamity to its knees.
+
+"France is experiencing now realism of quite another sort from that
+propagated by Zola--a realism that is wringing the souls and turning
+the thoughts of a great and unhappy people back once more to the eternal
+verities; in these grossness never had a place.
+
+"And if you don't want to think in grossness, don't read in it; if you
+don't want to act in grossness, don't think in it. To exploit it is to
+exaggerate its proper significance in the affairs of life.
+
+"Twenty-five years ago an American writer set out as a Zola disciple to
+give us something American along Zola's lines. He made a failure of
+it--so complete that he was forced to complain that later efforts in
+which he returned to paths of decency were refused by editors and
+publishers. He had spoiled his name as an asset. If you are curious to
+note how far the bars have been let down in his direction in twenty-five
+years, contemplate what passes to-day among us with quite a footing of
+magazine and book popularity. It means simply that we are falling into
+those conditions of public indifference in which moral parasites may
+flourish. But if one were forced to-day to choose in France between the
+material taken up by Zola after his failure to cultivate successfully
+cleaner fields, and that chosen by Rene Bazin and the new and hopeful
+French school of spirituality, there could be no question that the
+latter would afford the better opportunity. And there can be no real
+question but that the exponents of grossness are likewise opportunists,
+looking first of all for a market for their names--as most men are
+doing. But some men, by reason of inclination or voluntary restraint,
+have restricted themselves in their choice of literary materials."
+
+Mr. Spearman has recently given much of his time to moving-picture work,
+with the result that his name is nearly as familiar to the devotees of
+the flickering screen as to habitual magazine readers. I asked him how
+the development of the moving picture is likely to affect literature. He
+replied:
+
+"What I can say on this point will perhaps be more directly of interest
+to writers themselves; the development of the moving picture broadens
+their market. It has, if you will let me put it in this way, increased
+the number of our theaters in their capacity for absorbing material for
+the drama a thousandfold. Inevitably a new industry developing with such
+amazing rapidity is still in the experimental stages, and those who know
+it best say its possibilities are but just beginning. What I note of
+interest to the literary worker is that men advanced and in authority
+in the production of pictures have reached this conclusion: Behind every
+good picture there must be a good story. The slogan to-day is 'The story
+is the thing.' And those close to the 'inside' of the industry say
+to-day to the fictionist: 'Hold on to your stories. Within a year or two
+they will command from the movies much higher prices than to-day,
+because the supply is fast becoming exhausted.'"
+
+It was in the course of his remarks about the rewards of literature that
+Mr. Spearman told an interesting story concerning Henry James and George
+du Maurier. He said:
+
+"The recent death of Henry James is bringing out many anecdotes
+concerning him. At the time of George du Maurier's death it was recalled
+that he had once given the material for _Trilby_ to Henry James with
+permission to use it; and the story ran that, resolving to use it
+himself, Mr. James returned the material to Du Maurier, who wrote the
+novel from it.
+
+"But I don't think it has ever appeared that the real reason why Henry
+James did not attempt _Trilby_ was that he possessed no musical sense;
+Mr. James himself told me this, and without a sense of music the
+material was useless to any one. I discussed the incident with him some
+ten years ago and he added, in connection with _Trilby_ and Du Maurier,
+other interesting facts.
+
+"_Trilby_ did not at first make a signal success in England. Its first
+big hit was made in _Harper's Magazine_. Not realizing the American
+possibilities, Mr. du Maurier, when offered by Harper & Brothers a
+choice between royalties and five thousand dollars outright for the book
+rights, took the lump sum as if it were descended straight from heaven.
+When the news of the extraordinary success of the book in this country
+reached him, he realized his serious mistake, and in the family circle
+there was keen depression over it. But further surprises were in store
+for him. To their eternal credit, the house of Harper &
+Brothers--honorable then as now--in view of the unfortunate situation in
+which their author had placed himself, voluntarily canceled the first
+contract and restored Du Maurier to a royalty basis. The fear in the
+English home then was that this arrangement would come too late to bring
+in anything. Not only, however, did the book continue to sell, but the
+play came on, and together the rights afforded George du Maurier a
+competency that banished further worry from the home."
+
+
+
+
+_THE NOVEL MUST GO_
+
+WILL N. HARBEN
+
+
+The novel is doomed. If the automobile, the aeroplane, and the moving
+picture continue to develop during the next ten years as they have
+developed during the last ten, people will cease almost entirely to take
+interest in fiction.
+
+It was not Henry Ford who told me this. Neither was it Mr. Wright, nor
+M. Pathe. The man who made this ominous prophecy about the novel is
+himself a successful novelist. He is Will N. Harben, author of _Pole
+Baker_, _Ann Boyd_, _The Desired Woman_, and many other widely read
+tales of life in rural Georgia.
+
+Although he is so closely associated with the Southern scenes about
+which he has written, Mr. Harben spends most of his time in New York
+nowadays. He justifies this course interestingly--but before I tell his
+views on this subject I will repeat what he had to say about this
+possible extinction of the novel.
+
+"You have read," he said, "of the tremendous vogue of _Pickwick Papers_
+when it was first published. No work of fiction since that time has been
+received with such enthusiasm.
+
+"In London at that time you would find statuettes of Pickwick, Mr.
+Winkle, and Sam Weller in the shop windows. There were Pickwick
+punch-ladles, Pickwick teaspoons, Pickwick souvenirs of all sorts.
+
+"Now, when you walk down Broadway, do you find any reminders of the
+popular novels of the day? You do not, except of course in the
+bookshops. But you do find things that remind you of contemporary taste.
+In the windows of stationers and druggists you find statuettes not of
+characters in the fiction of the day, but of Charlie Chaplin.
+
+"Of course the moving picture has not supplanted the novel. But people
+all over the country are becoming less and less interested in fiction.
+The time which many people formerly gave to the latest novel they now
+give to the latest film.
+
+"And the moving picture is by no means the only thing which is weaning
+us away from the novel. The automobile is a powerful influence in this
+direction.
+
+"Take, for instance, the town from which I come--Dalton, Georgia. There
+the people who used to read novels spend their time which they used to
+give to that entertainment riding around in automobiles. Sometimes they
+go on long trips, sometimes they go to visit their friends in near-by
+towns. But automobiling is the way in which they nowadays are accustomed
+to spend their leisure.
+
+"Naturally, this has its effect on their attitude toward novels. Years
+ago, when Dalton had a population of about three thousand, it had two
+well-patronized bookshops. Now it has a population of about seven
+thousand and no bookshops at all!
+
+"I suppose one of the reasons is that people live their adventures by
+means of the automobile, and therefore do not care so much about getting
+adventures from the printed page. But the chief reason is one of
+time--the fact is that people more and more prefer automobiling to
+reading.
+
+"Now, if the aeroplane were to be perfected--as we have every reason to
+believe it will be--so that we could travel in it as we now do in the
+automobile, what possible interest would we have in reading dry novels?
+It seems likely that in a hundred years we will be able to see clearly
+the surface of Mars--do you think that people will want to read novels
+when this wonderful new world is before their eyes?
+
+"The authors themselves are beginning to realize this. They are becoming
+more and more nervous. They are not the placid creatures that they were
+in Sir Walter Scott's day. They feel that people are not as interested
+in them and their works as they used to be. I doubt very much if any
+publisher to-day would be interested, for example, in an author who
+produced a novel as long as _David Copperfield_ and of the same
+excellence."
+
+"But do you think," I asked, "that the fault is entirely that of the
+public? Haven't the authors changed, too?"
+
+"I think that the authors have changed," said Mr. Harben, reflectively.
+"The authors do not live as they used to live.
+
+"The authors no longer live with the people about whom they write.
+Instead, they live with other authors.
+
+"Nowadays, an author achieves success by writing, we will say, about
+the people of his home in the Far West. Then he comes to New York. And
+instead of living with the sort of people about whom he writes, he lives
+with artists. That must have its effect upon his work."
+
+"But is not that what you yourself did?" I asked. "A New York
+apartment-house is certainly the last place in the world in which to
+look for the historian of _Pole Baker_!"
+
+Mr. Harben smiled. "But I don't live with artists," he said. "I try to
+live with the kind of people I write about. I resolved a long time ago
+to try to avoid living with literary people and to live with all sorts
+of human beings--with people who didn't know or care whether or not I
+was a writer.
+
+"So I have for my friends and acquaintances sailors, merchants--people
+of all sorts of professions and trade. And people of that sort--people
+who make no pretensions to be artists--are the best company for a
+writer, for they open their hearts to him. A writer can learn how to
+write about humanity by living with humanity, instead of with other
+people who are trying to write about humanity."
+
+"But at any rate you have left the part of the country about which you
+write," I said. "And wasn't that one of the things for which you
+condemned our hypothetical writer of Western tales?"
+
+"Not necessarily," said Mr. Harben. "It sometimes happens that an author
+can write about the scenes he knows best only after he has gone away
+from them. I know that this is true of myself.
+
+"It's in line with the old saws about 'distance lends enchantment' and
+'emotion remembered in tranquillity,' you know. I believe that Du
+Maurier was able to write his vivid descriptions of life in the Latin
+Quarter of Paris because he went to London to do it.
+
+"You see, I absorbed life in Georgia for many years. And in New York I
+can remember it and get a perspective on it and write about it."
+
+"Then," I said, "you would go to Georgia, I suppose, if you wanted to
+write a story about life in a New York apartment?"
+
+Mr. Harben thought for a moment. "No," he said, slowly, "I don't think
+that I'd go to Georgia to write about New York. I think that a novel
+about New York must be written in New York--while a novel about Dalton,
+Georgia, must be written away from Dalton, Georgia."
+
+"How do you account for that?" I asked.
+
+"Well," said Mr. Harben, "for one thing there is something bracing about
+New York's atmosphere that makes it easier to write when one is here.
+Once I tried to write a novel in Dalton, and I simply couldn't do it.
+
+"And the reason why a novel about New York must be written in New York
+is because you can't absorb New York as you might absorb Georgia, so to
+speak, and then go away and express it. New York is so thoroughly
+artificial that there is nothing about it which a writer can absorb.
+
+"New York hasn't the puzzles and adventures and surprises that Georgia
+has. Everybody knows about apartment-houses and skyscrapers and subways
+and elevators and dumb-waiters--there's nothing new to say about them.
+
+"I sometimes think that the reason why the modern novel about New York
+City is so uninteresting is because everybody tries to write about New
+York City. And their novels are all of one pattern--necessarily, because
+life in New York City is all of one pattern.
+
+"In bygone days this was not true of New York. For instance, Mr.
+Howells's novels about New York City were about a community in which
+people lived in real houses and had families and friends. In those days
+life in New York had its problems and surprises and adventures; it was
+not lived mechanically and according to a set pattern.
+
+"What I have said about the advisability of an author's leaving the
+scenes about which he is to write is not universally true. There are
+writers who do better work by staying in the place where the scenes of
+their stories are laid. For instance, Joel Chandler Harris did better
+work by staying in the South than he would have done if he had gone
+away."
+
+"But wasn't that because his negro folk-tales were a sort of 'glorified
+reporting' rather than creative work?" I asked.
+
+"No," said Mr. Harben; "they were creative work. Joel Chandler Harris
+remembered just the bare skeleton of the stories as the negro had told
+them to him. And he developed them imaginatively. That was creative
+work. And he did most of his writing, and the best of his writing, in
+the office of _The Constitution_."
+
+"In view of what you said about the difficulty of absorbing New York
+life," I suggested, "I suppose that, in your opinion, the great American
+novel will not be written about New York."
+
+"What do you mean by the great American novel?" asked Mr. Harben. "So
+far as I know there is no great English novel or great Russian novel."
+
+"I suppose that the term means a novel inevitably associated with the
+national literature," I said. "You cannot think of English literature
+without thinking of _Vanity Fair_, for instance. Certainly there is no
+American novel so conspicuously a reflection of our national life as
+that novel is of English life."
+
+"Well," said Mr. Harben, "it is difficult to think of American
+literature or of American life without thinking of the novels of William
+Dean Howells. But the great American novel, to use that term, would be
+less likely to come into being than the great English novel.
+
+"You see, the United States is not as compact as England. London, it may
+be said, is England; it has all the characteristics of England, and in
+the season all England may be met there."
+
+Mr. Harben is not in sympathy with the theories of some of our modern
+realists.
+
+"The trouble with the average realist," he said, "is that he doesn't
+believe that the emotions are real. As a matter of fact, the greatest
+source of material for the novelist is to be found in the emotional and
+spiritual side of human nature. If writers were more receptive to
+spiritual and emotional impressions they would make better novels. It is
+the soul of man that the greatest novels are written about--there is
+Dostoievski's _Crime and Punishment_, for example!"
+
+In spite of his criticisms of some of the methods of the modern
+realists, Mr. Harben believes strongly in the importance of one
+realistic dogma, that which has to do with detailed description.
+
+"Why is it that _Pepys's Diary_ is interesting to us?" he asked. "It is
+because of its detail.
+
+"But if Pepys had been a Howells--if he had been as careful in
+describing great things as he was in describing small things--then his
+_Diary_ would be ten times more valuable to us than it is. And so
+Howells's novels will be valuable to people who read them a thousand
+years from now to get an idea of how we live.
+
+"That is, Howells's novels will be valuable if people read novels in the
+years that are to come! Perhaps they will not be reading novels or
+anything else. For all we know, thought-transference may become as
+common a thing as telephony is now. And if this comes to pass nobody
+will read!"
+
+
+
+
+_LITERATURE IN THE COLLEGES_
+
+JOHN ERSKINE
+
+
+Brown of Harvard is no more. The play of that name may still be running,
+but of Harvard life it is now about as accurate a picture as _Trelawney
+of the Wells_ is of modern English life. At Harvard, and at all the
+great American universities, the dashing, picturesque young athlete is
+no longer the prevailing type of the undergraduate ideal.
+
+Of course, undergraduate athletics and undergraduate athletes
+persist--it would be a tragedy if they did not--but the type of youth
+that has been rather effectively denominated the "rah-rah boy" is
+increasingly difficult to find. His place has been taken, not by the
+"grind," the plodding, prematurely old student, caring only for his
+books and his scholastic record, but by a normal young man, aware that
+the campus is not the most important place in the world; aware, in
+fact, that the university is not the universe.
+
+This young man knows about class politics, but also about international
+politics; about baseball, but also about contemporary literature. He is
+much more a citizen than his predecessor of ten years since, less
+provincial, less aristocratic. And he not only enjoys literature, but
+actually desires to create it.
+
+The chief enthusiasm at Harvard seems to be the drama; indeed, the Brown
+of Harvard to-day must be represented not as a crimson-sweatered
+gladiator but as a cross between Strindberg and George M. Cohan. At
+Columbia--I have Prof. John Erskine's word for it--there has lately
+developed a genuine interest in--what do you suppose? Poetry!
+
+I interviewed the bulletin-board outside Hamilton Hall before I
+interviewed Professor Erskine, and it, too, surprised me. It was not the
+bulletin-board of my not altogether remote undergraduate days. It bore
+notices telling of a meeting of the "Forum for Religious Discussion," of
+an anti-militaristic mass-meeting, of a rehearsal of an Elizabethan
+drama. It was a sign of the times.
+
+Professor Erskine said that undergraduate ideals had greatly changed
+during the last few years. I asked him how this had come to pass.
+
+"Well," he replied, "I think that college life reflects the ordinary
+life of the world more closely than is usually believed. This is a day
+of general cultural and spiritual awakening. The college student is
+waking, just as everybody else is waking; like everybody else, he is
+becoming more interested in the great things of life. There is no reason
+why the college walls should shut him in from the hopes, ambitions, and
+problems of the rest of humanity.
+
+"It isn't only the boys that have changed--the parents have changed too.
+Time was when the father and mother wanted their son to go to college so
+that he could join a group of pleasant, nice-mannered boys of good
+family. Now they have a definite idea of the practical value of a
+college education, they send their son to college intelligently.
+
+"Also, the whole theory of teaching has changed. The purely Germanic
+system has been superseded by something more humane. The old idea of
+scholarship for its own sake is no longer insisted upon. Instead, the
+subjects taught are treated in their relation to life, the only way in
+which they can be of real interest to the students.
+
+"You will look in vain in the modern university for the old type of
+absent-minded, dry-as-dust professor. He has been superseded by the
+professor who is a man as well as a scholar. And naturally he approaches
+his subject and his classes in a different spirit from that of his
+predecessor.
+
+"We have a new sort of teacher of English. He is not now (as was once
+often the case) a retired clergyman, or a specialist recruited from some
+unliterary field. He is, in many cases, a creative artist, a dramatist,
+a novelist, or a poet.
+
+"When I was in college this was not generally true. Then such a
+professor as George Edward Woodberry or Brander Matthews was unique. Now
+the college wants poets and creative writers."
+
+These are Professor Erskine's actual words. I asked him to repeat his
+last statement and he said, apparently with no sense of the amazement
+which his words caused in me, "The college wants the poets!" The stone
+which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner.
+
+But, then, there are poets and poets. There is, for example, Prof.
+Curtis Hidden Page. There is also one John Erskine, author of _Actaeon
+and Other Poems_, and Adjunct Professor of English at Columbia
+University. There is also Prof. Alfred Noyes. But there are also some
+thousand or so poets in the United States who will be surprised to know
+that the college wants them. Academic appreciation of poets has
+generally consisted of a cordial welcome given their collected works two
+hundred years after their deaths.
+
+"English as a cultural finish," Professor Erskine continued, "has gone
+by the board. English is taught nowadays with as much seriousness as
+philosophy or history. Art in all its forms is considered as the history
+of the race, and treated seriously by the student as well as by the
+professor. To-day the students regard Shakespeare and Tennyson as very
+important men. They study them as in a course in philosophy they would
+study Bergson. Literature, philosophy, and history have been drawn
+together as one subject, as they should be."
+
+"What," I asked, "are some of the extra-curricular manifestations of
+literary interest among the students?"
+
+"In the first place," he answered, "the extraordinary amount of writing
+done by the students. It is not at all unusual now for a Columbia
+student to sell his work to the regular magazines. The student who
+writes for the magazines and newspapers is no longer a novelty.
+Randolph Bourne, who was recently graduated, contributed a number of
+essays to the _Atlantic Monthly_ during his junior and senior years.
+
+"Many of the students write for the newspapers. The better sort of
+newspaper humorists have had a strong influence on the undergraduate
+mind; they have shown the way to writing things that are funny but have
+an intellectual appeal. This has resulted in the production of some
+really excellent light verse. Also, Horace's stock has gone up.
+
+"During the last two years some remarkable plays have been handed into
+the Columbia University Dramatic Association. Not only were they
+serious, but also they were highly poetic.
+
+"And this," said Professor Erskine, "marks what I hope is the
+distinguishing literary atmosphere at Columbia. The trend of the plays
+written by Columbia students is strongly poetic. This is not true,
+perhaps, of the plays written by students of other institutions. The
+writers of plays want to write poetic plays, and--what is perhaps even
+more surprising--the other students do not consider poetic drama
+'high-brow stuff.'
+
+"Philolexian, the oldest of the Columbia literary societies, has been
+producing Elizabethan plays. These plays have been enthusiastically
+received, and the enthusiasm does not seem to show any signs of dying
+down. The students come to the study of these plays with a feeling of
+familiarity, for they have seen them acted."
+
+"Does this enthusiasm for literature show itself in the college
+magazine?" I asked.
+
+"It shows itself," answered Professor Erskine, "by the absence of a
+literary magazine. The literary magazine has completely collapsed. In
+small colleges, far away from the cities where the regular magazines are
+published, the college magazine is the only available outlet for the
+work of the students who can write. But here in New York the students
+know the condition of the literary market, and the more skilful writers
+among them do not care to give their writings to an amateur publication
+when they can sell them off the campus. So the _Columbia Monthly_ got
+only second-best material. The boys who really could write would not
+sacrifice their work by burying it in a college publication, so the
+_Columbia Monthly_ died.
+
+"The history of a literary club we have up here, called Boar's Head, is
+significant. It was started as a sort of revival of an older
+organization called King's Crown. At first the program consisted of an
+address at each meeting by some prominent writer. For a while the
+meetings were well attended, but gradually the interest died down.
+
+"At length I found what the trouble was--the boys wanted to do their own
+entertaining. Now work by the members is read at every meeting; there
+are no addresses by outsiders.
+
+"And here again the poetic trend of the undergraduate mind at Columbia
+is displayed. The Scribblers' Club, which consisted of short-story
+writers, is dead--there were not enough short-story writers to support
+it. And at the meetings of Boar's Head there have been read, during the
+past two years, only one or two short stories.
+
+"The boys bring plays and poems to the Boar's Head meetings, but not
+short stories. Last year most of the poems which were read were short
+lyrics. Toward the end of last year and during the present year longer
+poems have been read. They are not poems in the Masefield manner; they
+are modeled rather on Keats and Coleridge. This fact has interested me
+because the magazines, as a rule, have not been buying long poems. I
+was interested to see that William Stanley Braithwaite, in his excellent
+_Anthology of Magazine Verse and Year-Book of American Poetry_, calls
+attention to the increasing popularity of the longer poem.
+
+"Last year Boar's Head decided to bring out a little book containing the
+best of the poems that were read at its meetings. A number of
+subscribers at twenty-five cents each were procured, and _Quad Ripples_
+was published. It contained only short poems. This year Boar's Head has
+published _Odes and Episodes_, a collection of light verse by one of its
+former members, Archie Austin Coates. It soon will publish a collection
+of poems read at its meetings, and all these poems are long. Some of
+these poems are so good that it is a real sacrifice for the boys to have
+them printed in this book instead of in some magazine.
+
+"Of course, there were always 'literary men' at Columbia, but they were
+considered unusual. Now they no longer even form a class by themselves.
+One of our best writers of light verse is the captain of the baseball
+team.
+
+"Speaking of light verse and baseball," continued Professor Erskine,
+"there is a certain connection between the _Columbia Monthly_ and
+football, besides the obvious parallel which lies in the fact that both
+have ceased to exist. Some of the boys express eagerness to revive the
+college magazine, just as they express eagerness to revive football. But
+it is, I believe, merely a matter of pride with them. They are eager to
+have football and to have a college magazine; they are not so eager to
+contribute to the support of either institution.
+
+"One proof of the literary renascence of Columbia is that the essays
+written in the regular course of the work in philosophy and in English
+are better than ever before."
+
+"Do you believe," I asked, "that being in the city has had a good effect
+on literary activity among Columbia students?"
+
+He answered: "I do think so, decidedly. It has produced an extreme
+individualism and has given the boys enterprising minds. It is true that
+it has its disadvantages, it has made the student, so to speak,
+centrifugal, and has destroyed collegiate co-operation of the old sort.
+But it has produced an original, independent type of student.
+
+"The older type of college student was interested in football because he
+knew that people expected him to be interested in football. The
+Columbia student of to-day is interested in poetry, not because it is a
+Columbia tradition to be interested in poetry, but because his tastes
+are naturally literary."
+
+Several of the causes of this poetic renascence at Columbia had been
+mentioned in the course of our conversation, but Professor Erskine had
+ignored one of the most important of them. So I will mention it now. It
+is John Erskine.
+
+
+
+
+_CITY LIFE VERSUS LITERATURE_
+
+JOHN BURROUGHS
+
+
+"Well," said John Burroughs, "she doesn't seem to want us out here, so I
+guess we'll have to go in." So we left the little summer-house
+overlooking the Hudson and went into the bark-walled study.
+
+Now, "she" was a fat and officious robin, and her nest was in a corner
+of the summer-house just over my head, as I sat with the
+poet-naturalist. The nest was full of hungry and unprepossessing young
+robins, and the mother robin seemed to be annoyed in her visits to it by
+our talk. As we walked to the study, leaving to the robin family
+undisputed possession of the summer-house, I heard John Burroughs say in
+tones of mild indignation, half to himself and half to me:
+
+"I won't stand this another year! This is the third year she's taken
+possession of that summer-house, and next May she simply must build her
+nest somewhere else!"
+
+Nevertheless, I think that this impudent robin will rear her 1917 brood
+in John Burroughs's summer-house, if she wants to.
+
+When I walked up from the station to Riverby--John Burroughs's
+twenty-acre home on the west shore of the Hudson--I was surprised by the
+agility of my seventy-nine-year-old companion. He walked with the
+elastic step of a young man, and his eyes and brain were as alert as in
+the days when he showed Emerson and Whitman the wild wonders of the
+hills.
+
+"Living in the city," he said, "is a discordant thing, an unnatural
+thing. The city is a place to which one goes to do business; it is a
+place where men overreach one another in the fight for money. But it is
+not a place in which one can live.
+
+"Years ago, I think, it was possible to have a home in the city. I used
+to think that a home in Boston might possibly be imagined. But no one
+can have a home in New York in all that noise and haste.
+
+"Sometimes I am worried by the thought of the effect that life in the
+city will have on coming generations. All this grind and rush and roar
+of the Subway and the surface cars must have some effect on the children
+of New-Yorkers. And that effect cannot be good.
+
+"And what effect can it have on our literature? It might produce, I
+suppose, in the writer's mind, a sense of the necessity of haste, a
+passionate desire to get his effect as quickly as possible. But can it
+give him sharpness of intellect and keenness of aesthetic perception! I'd
+like to think so, but I can't. I don't see how literature can be
+produced in the city. Literature must have repose, and there is no
+repose in New York so far as I can see.
+
+"Of course I have no right to speak for other writers. Some people can
+find repose in the city--I can't. I hear that people write on the
+trains, on the omnibus, and in the Subway--I don't see how they do it!"
+
+"Have you noticed," I asked, as we left the lane and walked down a
+grassy slope toward the study, "that the city has not as yet set its
+mark on our literature?"
+
+"I think," said John Burroughs, "that much of our modern fiction shows
+what I may call a metropolitan quality; it seems made up of showy
+streets and electric light. But I don't know. I don't read much
+fiction. I turn more to poetry and to meditative essays. Some poets find
+beauty in the city, and they must, I suppose, find repose there. Richard
+Watson Gilder spent nearly all his life in a city and reflected the life
+of the city in his poems. And Edmund Clarence Stedman was thoroughly a
+poet of the city. I don't think that any of Emerson's poems smack of the
+city. They smack of the country, and of Emerson's study in the country,
+his study under the pines, where, as he wrote:
+
+ the sacred pine-tree adds
+ To the leaves her myriads.
+
+"Of the younger poets, John James Piatt has written beautifully of the
+city. He wrote a very fine poem called 'The Morning Street,' which
+appeared in the _Atlantic Monthly_ some years ago. In it he describes
+vividly the hush of early morning in a great city, when the steps of a
+solitary traveler echo from the walls of the sleeping houses. I don't
+suppose Piatt is known to many readers of this generation. He was a
+friend of Howells, and was the co-author with Howells of _Poems by Two
+Friends_, published in the early sixties. This was Howells's first
+venture."
+
+We were in the bark-walled study now, seated before the great stone
+fireplace, in which some logs were blazing. On the stone shelf I saw,
+among the photographs of Carlyle and Emerson and other friends of my
+host, a portrait of Whitman.
+
+"Your friend, Walt Whitman," I said, "got inspiration from the city."
+
+"Yes," said John Burroughs, "he got inspiration from the city, but you
+wouldn't call his poems city poetry. His way of writing wasn't
+metropolitan, you know; you might say that he treated the city by a
+country method. What he loved about the city was its people--he loved
+the throngs of men, he loved human associations.
+
+"But he was a born lover of cities, Whitman was. He loved the city in
+all its phases, mainly because he was such a lover of his kind, of the
+'human critter,' as he calls him. Whitman spent most of his life in the
+city, and was more at home there than in the country. He came to
+Brooklyn when he was a boy, and there he worked in a law-office, and as
+a printer and on the _Eagle_.
+
+"For a while, I remember, he drove a 'bus up and down Broadway when the
+driver, who was a friend of his, was sick. That's where he got the
+stuff he put in _The Funeral of an Old Omnibus-driver_. He put in it all
+the signs and catch-words of the 'bus-drivers."
+
+John Burroughs pointed his steady old hand at a big framed photograph on
+the wall. It is an unusual portrait of Walt Whitman, showing him seated,
+with his hands clasped, with a flaring shirt collar, like a sailor's.
+
+"Whitman," John Burroughs continued, "seems to be appealing more and
+more to young men. But in the modern Whitmanesque young poets I don't
+see much to suggest Whitman, except in form. They do clever things, but
+not elemental things, not things with a cosmic basis. Whitman, with all
+his commonness and nearness, reached out into the abysmal depths, as his
+imitators fail to do. I think Robert Frost has been influenced by
+Whitman. His _North of Boston_ is very good; it is genuine realism; it
+is a faithful, convincing picture of New England farm life. When I first
+saw the book I didn't think I'd read three pages of it, but I read it
+all with keen interest. It's absolutely true.
+
+"I used to see Whitman often when he and I were working in Washington.
+And he came up to see me here. When I was in Washington Whitman used to
+like to come up to our house for Sunday morning breakfast. Mrs.
+Burroughs makes capital pancakes, and Walt was very fond of them, but he
+was always late for breakfast. The coffee would boil over, the griddle
+would smoke, car after car would go jingling by, and no Walt. But a car
+would stop at last, and Walt would roll off it and saunter up to the
+door--cheery, vigorous, serene, putting every one in good humor. And how
+he ate! He radiated health and hopefulness. This is what made his work
+among the sick soldiers in Washington of such inestimable value. Every
+one who came into personal relations with him felt his rare, compelling
+charm.
+
+"Very few young literary men of Whitman's day accepted him. Stedman did,
+and the fact is greatly to his credit. Howells and Aldrich were repelled
+by his bigness. All the Boston poets except Emerson hesitated. Emerson
+didn't hesitate--unlike Lowell and Holmes, he kept open house for big
+ideas."
+
+I asked Mr. Burroughs what, in his opinion, had brought about the change
+in the world's attitude toward Whitman.
+
+"Well," he replied, looking thoughtfully into the radiant depths of the
+open fire, "when Whitman first appeared we were all subservient to the
+conventional standards of English literature. We understood and
+appreciated only the pretty and exact. Whitman came in his working-man's
+garb, in his shirt sleeves he sauntered into the parlor of literature.
+
+"We resented it. But the young men nowadays are more liberal. More and
+more Whitman is forcing on them his open-air standards. Science
+supplemented by the human heart gives us a bigger and freer world than
+our forefathers knew. And then the European acceptance of Whitman had
+had its effect. We take our point of view so largely from Europe. And a
+force like Whitman's must be felt slowly; it's a cumulative thing."
+
+"You believe," I said, "that Whitman is our greatest poet?"
+
+"Oh yes," he replied, "Whitman is the greatest poet America has
+produced. He is great with the qualities that make Homer and the classic
+poets great. Emerson is more precious, more intellectual. Whitman and
+Emerson are our two greatest poets."
+
+While we strolled over the pleasant turf and watched a wood-thrush
+resting in the cool of the evening above her half-built nest among the
+cherry blossoms, John Burroughs returned to the subject that we had
+discussed on our way from the station--the city's evil effect on
+literature.
+
+"Business life," he said, "is inimical to poetry. To write poetry you
+must get into an atmosphere utterly different from that of the city. And
+one of the greatest of all enemies of literature is the newspaper. The
+style of writing that the newspaper has brought into existence is as far
+as possible from art and literature. When you are writing for a daily
+paper, you don't try to say a thing in a poetic or artistic way, but in
+an efficient way, in a business-like way. There is no appeal to the
+imagination, no ideality. A newspaper is a noisy thing that goes out
+into the street and shouts its way into the attention of people.
+
+"If you are going to write poetry you must say to certain phases of the
+newspapers, 'Get thee behind me, Satan!' A poet can't be developing his
+gossiping faculty and turning everything hot off the griddle. The daily
+paper is a new institution, and it has come to stay. But it has bad
+manners, and it is the enemy of all meditation, all privacy, all things
+that make for great art.
+
+"It's the same way with nature and writing about nature. From nature we
+get not literature, but the raw material for literature. It is very
+important for us to remember that the bee does not get honey from the
+flowers; it makes honey from what it gets from the flowers. What it gets
+from the flowers is nothing but sweet water. The bee gets its sweet
+water, retires, thinks it over, and by a private process makes it into
+honey.
+
+"So many nature-writers fail to profit by the example of the bee. They
+go into the woods and come out again and write about their
+experience--but they don't give us honey. They don't retire and subject
+what they find in the woods to a private process. They don't give us
+honey; they give us just a little sweet water, pretty thoroughly
+diluted.
+
+"In my own work--if I may mention it in all humbleness--I have tried for
+years not to give the world just a bare record, but to flavor it, so to
+speak, with my own personality, as the bee turns the sweet water that it
+gets into honey by adding its own formic acid.
+
+"If I lived in the city I couldn't do any writing, unless I succeeded in
+obliterating the city from my consciousness. But I shouldn't try to
+force my standards on every one. Other men live in the cities and
+write--Carlyle did most of his work in London. But he lived a secluded
+life even in the city, and he had to have his yearly pilgrimage to
+Scotland."
+
+It is some years since John Burroughs has written poetry, although all
+his prose is clearly the work of a poet. And it is safe to say that
+better known than any of his intimate prose studies of the out-of-door
+world--better known even than _Wake Robin_ and that immortal _A Hunt for
+the Nightingale_ and _In Fresh Fields_--is one of his poems, _Waiting_,
+the poem that begins:
+
+ Serene, I fold my hands and wait,
+ Nor care for wind, nor tide, nor sea;
+ I rave no more 'gainst time or fate,
+ For lo! my own shall come to me.
+
+"I wrote _Waiting_," he said, "in 1862, when I was reading medicine in
+the office of a country physician. It was a dingy afternoon, and I was
+feeling pretty blue. But the thought came to me--I suppose I got it from
+Goethe or some of the Orientals, probably by way of Emerson--that what
+belonged to me would come to me in time, if I waited--and if I also
+hustled. So I waited and I hustled, and my little poem turned out to be
+a prophecy. My own has come to me, as I never expected it to come. The
+best friends I have were seeking me all the while. There's Henry Ford;
+he had read all my books, and he came to me--that great-hearted man, the
+friend of all the birds, and my friend.
+
+"The poem first appeared in the _Knickerbocker Magazine_. That magazine
+was edited by a Cockney named Kinneha Cornwallis. It ran long enough to
+print one of Cornwallis's novels, and then it died. I remember that the
+_Knickerbocker Magazine_ never paid me for _Waiting_, and the poem
+didn't attract any attention until Whittier printed it in his _Songs of
+Three Centuries_.
+
+"It has been changed and tampered with and had all sorts of things done
+to it. It was found among the manuscripts of a poet down South after his
+death, and his literary executor was going to print it in his book. He
+wrote to me and asked if I could show a date for it earlier than 1882. I
+said, 'Yes, 1862!' and that settled that matter.
+
+"There was a man in Boston that I wanted to kick! He wrote to me and
+asked if he could print _Waiting_ on a card and circulate it among his
+friends. I told him he could, and sent him an autographed copy to make
+sure he'd get it straight. He sent me a package of the printed cards,
+and I found that he had added a stanza to it--a religious stanza, all
+about Heaven's gate! He had left out the second stanza, and added this
+religious stanza. He was worried because God had been left out of my
+poem--poor God, ignored by a little atom like me!
+
+"When people ask me where I got the idea in it, I generally say that my
+parents were old-school Baptists and believed in foreordination, and
+that's the way that foreordination cropped out in me--it's a sort of
+transcendental version of foreordination. I think the poem is true--like
+attracts like; it's the way in which we are constituted, rather than any
+conscious factor, that insures success. It's that that makes our
+fortunes, it's that that is the 'tide in the affairs of men' that
+Shakespeare meant."
+
+A few rods from John Burroughs's riverside house a brown thrush is
+building her nest in a cherry-tree. She is a bird of individual ideas,
+and is thoroughly convinced that paper, not twigs and leaves, forms the
+proper basis for her work. It is pleasant to think of John Burroughs
+seated in his study communing with the memories of Whitman and Emerson,
+and his other great dead friends. But it is pleasanter to think of him,
+as I saw him, anxious and intent, his great white beard mingled with the
+cherry blossoms, as he strolled over to fix the paper base of the
+thrush's nest so that the wind could not destroy it.
+
+
+
+
+_"EVASIVE IDEALISM" IN LITERATURE_
+
+ELLEN GLASGOW
+
+
+What is the matter with American literature? There are many answers that
+might be made to this often-asked question. "Nothing" might be one
+answer. "Commercialism" might be another. But the answer given by Ellen
+Glasgow, whose latest successful novel of American manners and morals is
+_Life and Gabriella_, is "evasive idealism."
+
+I found the young woman who has found in our Southern States themes for
+sympathetic realism rather than picturesque romance temporarily
+resident, inappropriately enough, in a hotel not far from Broadway and
+Forty-second Street. And I found her to be a woman of many ideas and
+strong convictions. One strongly felt and forcibly expressed conviction
+was that the "evasive idealism" which is evident in so much of our
+popular fiction is in reality the chief blemish on the American
+character, manifesting its baleful influence in our political, social,
+and economic life. Miss Glasgow first used the term "evasive idealism"
+in an effort to explain why contemporary English novels are better than
+contemporary American novels.
+
+"Certainly," she said, "the novels written by John Galsworthy and the
+other English novelists of the new generation are better than anything
+that we are producing in the United States at the present time. And I
+think that the reason for this is that in America we demand from our
+writers, as we demand from our politicians, and in general from those
+who theoretically are our men of light and leading, an evasive idealism
+instead of a straightforward facing of realities. In England the demand
+is for a direct and sincere interpretation of life, and that is what the
+novelists of England, especially the younger novelists, are making. But
+what the American public seems to desire is the cheapest sort of sham
+optimism. And apparently our writers--a great many of them--are ready
+and eager to meet this demand.
+
+"You know the sort of book which takes best in this country. It is the
+sort of book in which there is not from beginning to end a single
+attempt to portray a genuine human being. Instead there are a number of
+picturesque and attractive lay figures, and one of them is made to
+develop a whimsical, sentimental, and maudlinly optimistic philosophy of
+life.
+
+"That is what the people want--a sugary philosophy, utterly without any
+basis in logic or human experience. They want the cheapest sort of false
+optimism, and they want it to be uttered by a picturesque, whimsical
+character, in humorous dialect. Books made according to this receipt
+sell by the hundreds of thousands.
+
+"I don't know which is the more tragic, the fact that a desire for this
+sort of literary pabulum exists, or the fact that there are so many
+writers willing to satisfy that desire. But I do know that the
+widespread enthusiasm for this sort of writing is the reason for the
+inferiority of our novels to those of England. And, furthermore, I think
+that this evasive idealism, this preference for a pretty sham instead of
+the truth, is evident not only in literature, but in every phase of
+American life.
+
+"Look at our politics! We tolerate corruption; graft goes on
+undisturbed, except for some sporadic attacks of conscience on the part
+of various communities. The ugliness of sin is there, but we prefer not
+to look at it. Instead of facing the evil and attacking it manfully we
+go after any sort of a false god that will detract our attention from
+our shame. Just as in literature we want the books which deal not with
+life as it is, but with life as it might be imagined to be lived, so in
+politics we want to face not hard and unpleasant facts, but agreeable
+illusions.
+
+"Nevertheless," said Miss Glasgow, "I think that in literature there are
+signs of a movement away from this evasive idealism. It is much more
+evident in England than in America, but I think that in the course of
+time it will reach us, too. We shall cease to be 'slaves of words,' as
+Sophocles said, and learn that the novelist's duty is to understand and
+interpret life. And when our novelists and our readers of novels
+appreciate the advisability of this attitude, then will the social and
+political life of the United States be more wholesome than it has been
+for many a year. The new movement in the novel is away from sentimental
+optimism and toward an optimism that is genuine and robust."
+
+"Then a novel may be at once optimistic and realistic?" I said. "That
+is not in accord with the generally received ideas of realism."
+
+"It is true of the work of the great realists," answered Miss Glasgow.
+"True realism is optimistic, without being sentimental."
+
+"What realists have been optimistic?" I asked.
+
+"Well," said Miss Glasgow, "Henry Fielding, one of the first and
+greatest of English realists, surely was an optimist. And there was
+Charles Dickens--often, it is true, he was sentimental, but at his best
+he was a robust optimist.
+
+"But the greatest modern example of the robust optimistic realist,
+absolutely free from sentimentality, is George Meredith. Galsworthy, who
+surely is a realist, is optimistic in such works as _The Freelands_ and
+_The Patricians_. And Meredith is always realistic and always
+optimistic.
+
+"The optimism I mean, the optimism which is a distinguishing
+characteristic of George Meredith's works, does not come from an evasion
+of facts, but from a recognition of them. The constructive novelist, the
+novelist who really interprets life, never ignores any of the facts of
+life. Instead, he accepts them and builds upon them. And he perceives
+the power of the will to control destiny; he knows that life is not what
+you get out of it, but what you put into it. This is what the younger
+English novelists know and what our novelists must learn. And it is
+their growing recognition of this spirit that makes me feel that the
+tendency of modern literature is toward democracy."
+
+"What is the connection between democracy and the tendency you have
+described?" I asked.
+
+"To me," Miss Glasgow answered, "true democracy consists chiefly in the
+general recognition of the truth that will create destiny. Democracy
+does not consist in the belief that all men are born free and equal or
+in the desire that they shall be born free and equal. It consists in the
+knowledge that all people should possess an opportunity to use their
+will to control--to create--destiny, and that they should know that they
+have this opportunity. They must be educated to the use of the will, and
+they must be taught that character can create destiny.
+
+"Of course, environment inevitably has its effect on the character, and,
+therefore, on will, and, therefore, on destiny. You can so oppress and
+depress the body that the will has no chance. True democracy provides
+for all equal opportunities for the exercise of will. If you hang a
+man, you can't ask him to exercise his will. But if you give him a
+chance to live--which is the democratic thing to do--then you put before
+him an opportunity to exercise his will."
+
+"But what are the manifestations of this new democratic spirit?" I
+asked. "Is not the war, which is surely the greatest event of our time,
+an anti-democratic thing?"
+
+"The war is not anti-democratic," Miss Glasgow replied, "any more than
+it is anti-autocratic. Or rather, I may say it is both anti-democratic
+and anti-autocratic. It is a conflict of principles, a deadly struggle
+between democracy and imperialism. It is a fight for the new spirit of
+democracy against the old evil order of things.
+
+"Of course, I do not mean that the democracy of France and England is
+perfect. But with all its imperfections it is nearer true democracy than
+is the spirit of Germany. We should not expect the democracy of our
+country to be perfect. The time has not come for that. 'Man is not man
+as yet,' as Browning said in _Paracelsus_.
+
+"The war is turning people away from the false standards in art and
+letters which they served so long. The highly artificial romantic novel
+and drama are impossible in Europe to-day. The war has made that sort
+of thing absolutely absurd. And America must be affected by this just as
+every other nation in the world is affected. To our novelists and to all
+of us must come a sense of the serious importance of actual life,
+instead of a sense of the beauty of romantic illusions. There are many
+indications of this tendency in our contemporary literature. For
+instance, in poetry we have the Spoon River Anthology--surely a sign of
+the return of the poet to real life. But the greatest poets, like the
+greatest novelists, have always been passionately interested in real
+life. Walt Whitman and Robert Browning always were realists and always
+were optimistic. Whitman was a most exultant optimist; he was optimistic
+even about dying.
+
+"Among recent books of verse I have been much impressed by Masefield's
+_Good Friday_. There is a work which is both august and sympathetic; Mr.
+Masefield's treatment of his theme is realistic, yet thoroughly
+reverent. There is one line in it which I think I never shall forget. It
+is, 'The men who suffer most endure the least.'
+
+"_Good Friday_ is a sign of literature's strong tendency toward reality.
+It seems to me to be a phase of the general breaking down of the
+barriers between the nations, the classes, and the sexes. But this
+breaking down of barriers is something that most of our novelists have
+been ignoring. Mary Watts has recognized it, but she is one of the very
+few American novelists to do so."
+
+"But this sort of consciousness is not generally considered to be a
+characteristic of the realistic novelist," I said. And I mentioned to
+Miss Glasgow a certain conspicuous American novelist whose books are
+very long, very dull, and distinguished only by their author's obsession
+with sex. He, I said, was the man of whom most people would think first
+when the word realist was spoken.
+
+"Of course," said Miss Glasgow, "we must distinguish between a realist
+and a vulgarian, and I do not see how a writer who is absolutely without
+humor can justly be called a realist. Consider the great realists--Jane
+Austen, Henry Fielding, Anthony Trollope, George Meredith--they all had
+humor. What our novelists need chiefly are more humor and a more serious
+attitude toward life. If our novelists are titanic enough, they will
+have a serious attitude toward life, and if they stand far enough off
+they will have humor.
+
+"I hope," Miss Glasgow added, "that America will produce better
+literature after the war. I hope that a change for the better will be
+evident in all branches of literary endeavor. We have to-day many
+novelists who start out with the serious purpose of interpreting life.
+But they don't interpret it. They find that it is easier to give the
+people what they want than to interpret life. Therefore this change in
+the character of our novels must come after the people themselves are
+awakened to a sense of the importance of real life, instead of life
+sentimentally and deceptively portrayed.
+
+"I think that our novels to-day are better than they were twenty-five
+years ago. Of course, we have no Hawthorne to-day, but the general
+average of stories is better than it was. We have so many accomplished
+writers of short stories. There is Katharine Fullerton Gerould. What an
+admirable artist she is! Mary E. Wilkins has written some splendid
+interpretations of New England life, and Miss Jewett reflected the mind
+and soul of a part of our country."
+
+
+
+
+_"CHOCOLATE FUDGE" IN THE MAGAZINES_
+
+FANNIE HURST
+
+
+Only a few years ago Fannie Hurst's name was unknown to most readers.
+But in a surprisingly short time Miss Hurst's short stories, especially
+her sympathetic and poignantly realistic studies of the life of the
+Jewish citizens of New York, have earned for her popular as well as
+critical approval.
+
+Fannie Hurst's fame has been won almost entirely through the most widely
+circulated weekly and monthly magazines. And yet when I talked to this
+energetic young woman the other morning in her studio in Carnegie Hall,
+I found her attitude toward the magazines anything but friendly. She
+accused them of printing what she called "chocolate-fudge" fiction. And
+she said it in a way which indicated that chocolate fudge is not her
+favorite dish.
+
+"I do not feel," she said, "that the American magazine is exerting
+itself toward influencing our fiction for the better. In most cases it
+is content to pander to the untutored public taste instead of attempting
+anything constructive.
+
+"The magazine public is, after all, open to conviction. But phlegm and
+commercialism on the part of most of our magazines lead them to give the
+public what it wants rather than what is good for it.
+
+"'If chocolate-fudge fiction will sell the magazine, give 'em chocolate
+fudge!' say editors and publishers. Small wonder that American
+fiction-readers continue bilious in their demands. Authors, meanwhile,
+who like sweet butter on their bread--it is amazing how many
+do--continue to postpone that Big Idea, and American fiction pauses by
+the wayside."
+
+"What is the remedy for this condition, Miss Hurst?" I asked. "Would
+matters be better if the writers did not have to comply with the demands
+of the magazines--if they had some other means of making a living than
+writing?"
+
+Miss Hurst did not answer at once. At length she said, thoughtfully:
+
+"It would seem that to escape this almost inevitable overlapping of
+bread and sweet butter the writer of short stories should not depend
+upon the sale of his work for a living, but should endeavor to provide
+himself with some other source of income.
+
+"Theoretically, at least, such a condition would eliminate the
+pot-boilers and safeguard the serious worker from the possibility of
+'misshaping' his art to meet a commercial condition.
+
+"I say theoretically because from my own point of view I cannot conceive
+of short-story writing as an avocation. The gentle art of short fiction
+consumes just about six hours of my day at the rate of from twenty to
+twenty-five days on a story of from eight to ten thousand words. And
+since I work best from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., I can think of no remunerative
+occupation outside those hours except cabaret work or night clerking."
+
+"What about present-day relationship between American publishers and
+authors?" I asked, "Do you think they are all they should be?"
+
+"American publishers and authors," Miss Hurst replied, "to-day seem to
+be working somewhat at cross-purposes, owing partially, I think, to the
+great commercial significance that has become attached to the various
+rights, such as motion-picture, serial, dramatic, book, etc., and which
+are to be reckoned with in the sale of fiction.
+
+"There is little doubt that authors have suffered at the hands of
+publishers on these various scores, oftener than not the publisher and
+not the author reaping the benefits accruing from the author's ignorance
+of conditions or lack of foresight.
+
+"The Authors' League has been formed to remedy just that evil--and it
+was a crying one.
+
+"On the other hand, it is certain that fiction-writers are better paid
+to-day than ever in the history of literature, and if a man is writing a
+seventy-five-dollar story there is a pretty good reason why.
+
+"I feel a great deal of hesitancy about the present proposed affiliation
+of authors with labor. There is so much to be said on both sides!
+
+"If the publisher represents capital and the author labor, my sympathies
+immediately veer me toward labor. But do they? That same question has
+recently been thrashed out by the actors, and they have gone over to
+labor. Scores of our most prominent American authors are of that same
+persuasion.
+
+"I cannot help but feel that for publisher and author to assume the
+relationship of employer and employee is a dangerous step. All forms of
+labor do not come under the same head. And I am the last to say that
+writing is not hard labor. But Cellini could hardly have allied himself
+with an iron-workers' guild. All men are mammals, but not all mammals
+are men!
+
+"It seems doubly unfortunate, with the Authors' League in existence to
+direct and safeguard the financial destiny of the author, to take a step
+which immediately places the author and publisher on the same basis of
+relationship that exists between hod-carrier and contractor.
+
+"As a matter of fact, I am almost wont to question the traditional lack
+of business acumen in authors. On the contrary, almost every successful
+author of my acquaintance not only is pretty well able to take care of
+himself, but owns a motor-car and a safety-deposit box at the same time.
+And I find the not-so-successful authors prodding pretty faithfully to
+get their prices up.
+
+"The Authors' League is a great institution and fills a great need. It
+was formed for just the purpose that seems to be prompting authors to
+unionize--to instruct authors in their rights and protect them against
+infringements.
+
+"Why unionize? Next, an author will find himself obliged to lay aside
+his pen when the whistle blows, and publishers will be finding
+themselves obliged to deal in open-shop literature."
+
+"And what effect are the moving pictures going to have on fiction?" I
+asked. "Will it be good or bad?"
+
+"Up to the present," Miss Hurst replied, "moving pictures have, in my
+opinion, been little else than a destructive force where American
+fiction is concerned. Picturized fiction is on a cheap and sensational
+level. Even classics and standardized fiction are ruthlessly defamed by
+tawdry presentation. With the mechanics of the motion picture so
+advanced, it is unfortunate that the photoplay itself is not keeping
+pace with that advancement.
+
+"Motion pictures are in the hands of laymen, and they show it. The
+scenario-writers, so-called 'staff writers,' have sprung up overnight,
+so to speak, and, from what I understand, when authors venture into the
+field they are at the mercy of the moving-picture director.
+
+"Mrs. Frances Hodgson Burnett could not endure to sit through the
+picture presentation of _Little Lord Fauntleroy_, so mutilated was it.
+
+"Of course, scenario-writing is a new art, and this interesting form of
+expression has hardly emerged from its infancy. Except perhaps in such
+great spectacles as 'The Birth of a Nation,' where, after all, the play
+is not the thing."
+
+I asked Miss Hurst if she agreed with those who believe that Edgar Allan
+Poe's short stories have never been surpassed. I found that she did not.
+
+"I should say," she said, "that since Poe's time we have had masters of
+the short story who have equaled him. Poe is, of course, the legitimate
+father of the American short story, and, coupled with that fact, was
+possessed of that kind of self-consciousness which enabled him to
+formulate a law of composition which has not been without its influence
+upon our subsequent short fiction.
+
+"But in American letters there is little doubt that in the last one
+hundred years the short story has made more progress than any other
+literary type. We are becoming not only proficient, but pre-eminent in
+the short story. I can think off-hand of quite a group of writers, each
+of whom has contributed short-story classics to our literature.
+
+"There are Robert Louis Stevenson, Henry James (if we may claim him),
+Bret Harte, Mark Twain, Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, O. Henry, Richard
+Harding Davis, Jack London, and Booth Tarkington. And I am sure that
+there are various others whose names do not occur to me at this moment."
+
+"You mentioned O. Henry," I said. "Then you do not share Katharine
+Fullerton Gerould's belief that O. Henry's influence on modern fiction
+is bad?"
+
+"I decidedly disagree," said Miss Hurst, with considerable firmness,
+"with the statement that O. Henry wrote incidents rather than short
+stories, and is a pernicious influence in modern letters. That his
+structural form is more than anecdotal can be shown by an analysis of
+almost any of his plots.
+
+"But it seems pedantic to criticize O. Henry on the score of structure.
+Admitting that the substance of his writings does rest on frail
+framework, even sometimes upon the trick, he built with Gothic skill and
+with no obvious pillars of support.
+
+"Corot was none the less a landscape artist because he removed that
+particular brown tree from that particular green slope. O. Henry's
+facetiousness and, if you will, his frail structures, are no more to be
+reckoned with than, for instance, the extravagance of plot and the
+morbid formality we find in Poe.
+
+"The smiting word and the polished phrase he quite frankly subordinated
+to the laugh, or the tear with a sniffle. Just as soon call red woolen
+underwear pernicious!
+
+"The Henry James school has put a super-finish upon literature which, it
+is true, gives the same satisfying sense of wholeness that we get from a
+Greek urn. But, after all, chastity is not the first and last requisite.
+O. Henry loved to laugh with life! It was not in him to regard it with a
+Mona Lisa smile."
+
+Miss Hurst has confined her attention so closely to American
+metropolitan life that I thought it would be interesting to have her
+opinion as to the truth of the remark, attributed to William Dean
+Howells, that American literature is merely a phase of English
+literature. In reply to my question she said:
+
+"I agree with Mr. Howells that American literature up to now has been
+rather a phase of English literature. His own graceful art is an example
+of cousinship. American literature probably will continue to be an
+effort until our American melting-pot ceases boiling.
+
+"_David Copperfield_ and _Vanity Fair_ come from a people whose lineage
+goes back by century-plants and not by Mayflowers. Theodore Dreiser and
+Ernest Poole, sometimes more or less inarticulately, are preparing us
+for the great American novel. When we reach a proper consistency the
+boiling is bound to cease, and, just as inevitably, the epic novel must
+come."
+
+
+
+
+_THE NEW SPIRIT IN POETRY_
+
+AMY LOWELL
+
+
+Miss Amy Lowell, America's chief advocate and practitioner of the new
+poetry, would wear, I supposed, a gown by Bakst, with many Oriental
+jewels. And incense would be burning in a golden basin. And Miss Lowell
+would say that the art of poetry was discovered in 1916.
+
+But there is nothing exotic or artificial about Miss Lowell's appearance
+and surroundings. Nor did the author of _Sword Blades and Poppy Seed_
+express, when I talked to her the other day, any of the extravagant
+opinions which conservative critics attribute to the _vers libristes_.
+Miss Lowell talked with the practicality which is of New England and the
+serenity which is of Boston; she was positive, but not narrowly
+dogmatic; she is keenly appreciative of contemporary poetry, but she has
+the fullest sense of the value of the great heritage of poetical
+tradition that has come down to us through the ages.
+
+There is so much careless talk of _imagisme_, _vers libre_, and the new
+poetry in general that I thought it advisable to begin our talk by
+asking for a definition or a description of the new poetry. In reply to
+my question Miss Lowell said:
+
+"The thing that makes me feel sure that there is a future in the new
+poetry is the fact that those who write it follow so many different
+lines of thought. The new poetry is so large a subject that it can
+scarcely be covered by one definition. It seems to me that there are
+four definite sorts of new poetry, which I will attempt to describe.
+
+"One branch of the new poetry may be called the realistic school. This
+branch is descended partly from Whitman and partly from the
+prose-writers of France and England. The leading exponents of it are
+Robert Frost and Edgar Lee Masters. These two poets are different from
+each other, but they both are realists, they march under the same
+banner.
+
+"Another branch of the new poetry consists of the poets whose work shows
+a mixture of the highly imaginative and the realistic. Their thought
+verges on the purely imaginative, but is corrected by a scientific
+attitude of mind. I suppose that this particular movement in English
+poetry may be said to have started with Coleridge, but in England the
+movement hardly attained its due proportions. Half of literary England
+followed Wordsworth, half followed Byron. It is in America that we find
+the greatest disciple of Coleridge in the person of Edgar Allan Poe. The
+force of the movement then went back to France, where it showed clearly
+in Mallarme and the later symbolists. To-day we see this tendency
+somewhat popularized in Vachell Lindsay, although perhaps he does not
+know it. And if I may be so bold as to mention myself, I should say that
+I in common with most other imagists belong to this branch, that I am at
+once a fantasist and a realist.
+
+"Thirdly, we have the lyrico-imaginative type of poet. Of this branch
+the best example that I can call to mind is John Gould Fletcher. The
+fourth group of the new poets consists of those who are descended
+straight from Matthew Arnold. They show the Wordsworth influence
+corrected by experience and education. Browning is in their line of
+descent. Characteristics of their work are high seriousness,
+astringency, and a certain pruning down of poetry so that redundancy is
+absolutely avoided. Of this type the most striking example is Edwin
+Arlington Robinson."
+
+"Miss Lowell," I said, "the opponents of the new poetry generally attack
+it chiefly on account of its form--or rather, on account of its
+formlessness. And yet what you have said has to do only with the idea
+itself. You have said nothing about the way in which the idea is
+expressed."
+
+"There is no special form which is characteristic of the new poetry,"
+said Miss Lowell, "and of course 'formlessness' is a word which is
+applied to it only by the ignorant. The new poetry is in every form.
+Edgar Lee Masters has written in _vers libre_ and in regular rhythm.
+Robert Frost writes in blank verse. Vachell Lindsay writes in varied
+rhyme schemes. I write in both the regular meters and the newer forms,
+such as _vers libre_ and 'polyphonic prose.'
+
+"It is a mistake to suppose, as many conservative critics do, that
+modern poetry is a matter of _vers libre_. _Vers libre_ is not new, but
+it is valuable to give vividness when vividness is desired. _Vers libre_
+is a difficult thing to write well, and a very easy thing to write
+badly. This particular branch of the new poetry movement has been
+imitated so extensively that it has brought the whole movement into
+disrepute in the eyes of casual observers. But we must remember that no
+movement is to be judged by its obscure imitators. A movement must be
+judged by the few people at its head who make the trend. There cannot be
+many of them. In the history of the world there are only a few supreme
+artists, only a small number of great artists, only a limited number of
+good artists. And to suppose that we in America at this particular
+moment can be possessed of many artists worthy of consideration is
+ridiculous.
+
+"Undoubtedly the fact that a great number of people are engaged to-day
+in producing poetry is a great stimulus and helps to create a proper
+atmosphere for those men whose work may live. For it is a curious fact
+that the artistic names that have come down to us are those of men who
+have lived in the so-called great artistic periods, when many other men
+were working at the same thing."
+
+I asked Miss Lowell to tell something of this _vers libre_ which is so
+much discussed and so little understood. She said:
+
+"_Vers libre_ is based upon rhythm. Its definition is 'A verse form
+based upon cadence rather than upon exact meter.' It is a little
+difficult to define cadence when dealing with poetry. I might call it
+the sense of balance.
+
+"The unit of _vers libre_ is the strophe, not the line or the foot, as
+in regular meter. The strophe is a group of words which round themselves
+satisfactorily to the ear. In short poems this complete rounding may
+take place only at the end, making the poem a unit of a single movement,
+the lines serving only to give the slight up-and-down effect necessary
+to the voice when the poem is read aloud.
+
+"In longer poems the strophe may be a group of lines. Poetry being a
+spoken and not a written art, those not well versed in the various
+poetic forms will find it simpler to read _vers libre_ poems aloud,
+rather than to try to get their rhythm from the printed page. For people
+who are used only to the exact meters, the printed arrangement of a
+_vers libre_ poem is a confusing process. To a certain extent cadence is
+dependent upon quantity--long and short syllables being of peculiar
+importance. Words hurried over in reading are balanced by words on which
+the reader pauses. Remember, also, that _vers libre_ can be either
+rhymed or unrhymed."
+
+"One objection," I said, "that many critics bring up against unrhymed
+poetry is that it cannot be remembered."
+
+"I cannot see that that is of the slightest importance," Miss Lowell
+replied. "The music that we whistle when we come out of the theater is
+not the greatest music we have heard.
+
+ "Zaccheus he
+ Did climb a tree
+ His Lord to see
+
+is easily remembered. But I refuse to think that it is great poetry.
+
+"The enemies of _vers libre_," she continued, "say that _vers libre_ is
+in no respect different from oratory. Now, there is a difference between
+the cadence of _vers libre_ and the cadence of oratory. Lincoln's
+Gettysburg address is not _vers libre_, it is rhythmical prose. At the
+prose end of cadence is rhythmical prose; at the verse end is _vers
+libre_. The difference is in the kind of cadence.
+
+"Recently a writer in _The Nation_ took some of Meredith's prose and
+made it into _vers libre_ poems which any poet would have been glad to
+write. Then he took some of my poems and turned them into prose, with a
+result which he was kind enough to call beautiful. He then pertinently
+asked what was the difference.
+
+"I might answer that there is no difference. Typography is not relevant
+to the discussion. Whether a thing is written as prose or as verse is
+immaterial. But if we would see the advantage which Meredith's
+imagination enjoyed in the freer forms of expression, we need only
+compare these lyrical passages from his prose works with his own
+metrical poetry."
+
+I asked Miss Lowell about the charge that the new poets are lacking in
+reverence for the great poets of the past. She believes that the charge
+is unfounded. Nevertheless, she believes that the new poets do well to
+take the New England group of writers less seriously than conservative
+critics would have them take them.
+
+"America has produced only two great poets, Whitman and Poe," said Miss
+Lowell. "The rest of the early American poets were cultivated gentlemen,
+but they were more exactly English provincial poets than American poets,
+and they were decidedly inferior to the parent stock. The men of the New
+England group, with the single exception of Emerson, were cultivated
+gentlemen with a taste for literature--they never rose above that level.
+
+"No one can judge his contemporaries. We cannot say with certainty that
+the poets of this generation are better than their predecessors. But
+surely we can see that the new poets have more originality, more of the
+stuff out of which poetry is made, than their predecessors had, aside
+from the two great exceptions that I have mentioned."
+
+"What is the thing that American poetry chiefly needs?" I asked.
+
+"Well," said Miss Lowell, "I wish that there were a great many changes
+in our attitude toward literature. I wish that no man could expect to
+make a living by writing. I wish that the magazines did not pay for
+contributions--few of them do in France, you know. And I wish that the
+newspapers did not try to review books. But the thing that we chiefly
+need is informed and authoritative criticism.
+
+"We have very few critics, we have practically none who are writing
+separate books on contemporary verse. When I was writing my _French
+Poets_ I read twenty or thirty books on contemporary French poetry,
+serious books, written by critics who make a specialty of the poetry of
+their own day.
+
+"We have nothing like this in America. The men who write critical books
+write of the literature of a hundred years ago. No critical mind is
+bent toward contemporary verse. There are a few newspaper critics who
+pay serious attention to contemporary verse--William Stanley
+Braithwaite, O. W. Firkins, and Louis Untermeyer, for example--but there
+are only a few of them.
+
+"What is to be desired is for some one to be as interested in criticism
+as the poets are in poetry. It was the regularity of Sainte-Beuve's
+'Causeries du Lundi' that gave it its weight. What we want is a critic
+like that, who is neither an old man despairing of a better job nor a
+young man using his newspaper work as a stepping-stone to something
+higher. Of course, brilliant criticisms of poetry appear from time to
+time, but what we need is criticism as an institution.
+
+"After all," said Miss Lowell, in conclusion, "there are only two kinds
+of poetry, good poetry and bad poetry. The form of poetry is a matter of
+individual idiosyncrasy. It is only the very young and the very old, the
+very inexperienced or the numbed, who say, 'This is the only way in
+which poetry shall be written!'"
+
+
+
+
+_A NEW DEFINITION OF POETRY_
+
+EDWIN ARLINGTON ROBINSON
+
+
+At no time in the history of literature have the critics been able to
+agree upon a definition of poetry. And the recent popularity of _vers
+libre_ and _imagisme_ has made the definer's task harder than ever
+before. Is rhyme essential to poetry? Is rhythm essential to poetry? Can
+a mere reflection of life justly be called poetry, or must imagination
+be present?
+
+I put some of these questions to Edwin Arlington Robinson, who wrote
+_Captain Craig_, _The Children of the Night_, _The Town Down the River_,
+_The Man Against the Sky_ and _Merlin: A Poem_. And this man, whom
+William Stanley Braithwaite and other authoritative critics have called
+the foremost of American poets, this student of life, who was revealing
+the mysterious poetry of humanity many years before Edgar Lee Masters
+discovered to the world the vexed spirits that haunt Spoon River,
+rewarded my questioning with a new definition of poetry. He said:
+
+"Poetry is a language that tells us, through a more or less emotional
+reaction, something that cannot be said.
+
+"All real poetry, great or small, does this," he added. "And it seems to
+me that poetry has two characteristics. One is that it is, after all,
+undefinable. The other is that it is eventually unmistakable."
+
+"'Eventually'!" I said. "Then you think that poetry is not always
+appreciated in the lifetime of its maker?"
+
+Mr. Robinson smiled whimsically. "I never use words enough," he said.
+"It is not unmistakable as soon as it is published, but sooner or later
+it is unmistakable.
+
+"And in the poet's lifetime there are always some people who will
+understand and appreciate his work. I really think that it is impossible
+for a real poet permanently to escape appreciation. And I can't imagine
+anything sillier for a man to do than to worry about poetry that has
+once been decently published. The rest is in the hands of Time, and Time
+has more than often a way of making a pretty thorough job of it."
+
+"But why is it," I asked, "that a great poet so often is without honor
+in his own generation, where mediocrity is immediately famous?"
+
+"It's hard to say," said Mr. Robinson, thoughtfully regarding the
+glowing end of his cigar. "Many causes prevent poetry from being
+correctly appraised in its own time. Any poetry that is marked by
+violence, that is conspicuous in color, that is sensationally odd, makes
+an immediate appeal. On the other hand, poetry that is not noticeably
+eccentric sometimes fails for years to attract any attention.
+
+"I think that this is why so many of Kipling's worst poems are greatly
+overpraised, while some of his best poems are not appreciated. _Gunga
+Din_, which is, of course, a good thing in its way, has been praised far
+more than it deserves, because of its oddity. And the poem beginning
+'There's a whisper down the field' has never been properly appreciated.
+It's one of the very best of Kipling's poems, although it is marred by a
+few lapses of taste. One of his greatest poems, by the way, _The
+Children of the Zodiac_, happens to be in prose.
+
+"But I am always revising my opinion of Kipling. I have changed my mind
+about him so often that I have no confidence in my critical judgment.
+That is one of the reasons why I do not like to criticise my American
+contemporaries."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that this tendency to pay attention chiefly to
+the more sensational poets is as characteristic of our generation as of
+those that came before?"
+
+"I think it applies particularly to our own time," he replied. "More
+than ever before oddity and violence are bringing into prominence poets
+who have little besides these two qualities to offer the world, and some
+who have much more. It may seem very strange to you, but I think that a
+great modern instance of this tendency is the case of Robert Browning.
+The eccentricities of Browning's method are the things that first turned
+popular attention upon him, but the startling quality in Browning made
+more sensation in his own time than it can ever make again. I say this
+in spite of the fact that Browning and Wordsworth are taken as the
+classic examples of slow recognition. Wordsworth, you know, had no
+respect for the judgment of youth. It may have been sour grapes, but I
+am inclined to think that there was a great deal of truth in his
+opinion.
+
+"I think it is safe to say that all real poetry is going to give at some
+time or other a suggestion of finality. In real poetry you find that
+something has been said, and yet you find also about it a sort of nimbus
+of what can't be said.
+
+"This nimbus may be there--I wouldn't say that it isn't there--and yet I
+can't find it in much of the self-conscious experimenting that is going
+on nowadays in the name of poetry.
+
+"I can't get over the impression," Mr. Robinson went on, with a
+meditative frown, "that these post-impressionists in painting and most
+of the _vers libristes_ in poetry are trying to find some sort of short
+cut to artistic success. I know that many of the new writers insist that
+it is harder to write good _vers libre_ than to write good rhymed
+poetry. And judging from some of their results, I am inclined to agree
+with them."
+
+I asked Mr. Robinson if he believed that the evident increase in
+interest in poetry, shown by the large sales of the work of Robert Frost
+and Edgar Lee Masters and Rupert Brooke, indicated a real renascence of
+poetry.
+
+"I think that it indicates a real renascence of poetry," he replied. "I
+am sufficiently child-like and hopeful to find it very encouraging."
+
+"Do you think," I asked, "that the poetry that is written in America
+to-day is better than that written a generation ago?"
+
+"I should hardly venture to say that," said Mr. Robinson. "For one
+thing, we have no Emerson. Emerson is the greatest poet who ever wrote
+in America. Passages scattered here and there in his work surely are the
+greatest of American poetry. In fact, I think that there are lines and
+sentences in Emerson's poetry that are as great as anything anywhere."
+
+I asked Mr. Robinson whether he thought the modern English poets were
+doing better work than their American contemporaries. At first he was
+unwilling to express an opinion on this subject, repeating his statement
+that he mistrusted his own critical judgment. But he said:
+
+"Within his limits, I believe that A. E. Housman is the most authentic
+poet now writing in England. But, of course, his limits are very sharply
+drawn. I don't think that any one who knows anything about poetry will
+ever think of questioning the inspiration of _A Shropshire Lad_."
+
+"Would you make a similar comment on any other poetry of our time?" I
+asked.
+
+"Well," said Mr. Robinson, reflectively, "I think that no one will
+question the inspiration of some of Kipling's poems, of parts of John
+Masefield's _Dauber_, and some of the long lyrics of Alfred Noyes. But I
+do not think that either of these poets gives the impression of finality
+which A. E. Housman gives. But the way in which I have shifted my
+opinion about some of Rudyard Kipling's poems, and most of Swinburne's,
+makes me think that Wordsworth was very largely right in his attitude
+toward the judgment of youth. But where my opinions have shifted, I
+think now that I always had misgivings. I fancy that youth always has
+misgivings in regard to what is later to be modified or repudiated."
+
+Then I asked Mr. Robinson if he thought that the war had anything to do
+with the renascence of poetry.
+
+"I can't see any connection," he replied. "The only effect on poetry
+that the war has had, so far as I know, is to produce those five sonnets
+by Rupert Brooke. I can't see that it has caused any poetical event. And
+there's no use prophesying what the war will or will not do to poetry,
+because no one knows anything about it. The Civil War seems to have had
+little effect on poetry except to produce Julia Ward Howe's _Battle
+Hymn of the Republic_, Whitman's poems on the death of Lincoln, and
+Lowell's 'Ode.'"
+
+"Mr. Robinson," I said, "there has been much discussion recently about
+the rewards of poetry, and Miss Amy Lowell has said that no poet ought
+to be expected to make a living by writing. What do you think about it?"
+
+"Should a poet be able to make a living out of poetry?" said Mr.
+Robinson. "Generally speaking, it is not possible for a poet to make a
+decent living by his work. In most cases it would be bad for his
+creative faculties for a poet to make as much money as a successful
+novelist makes. Fortunately, there is no danger of that. Now, assuming
+that a poet has enough money to live on, the most important thing for
+him to have is an audience. I mean that the best poetry is likely to be
+written when poetry is in the air. If a poet with no obligations and
+responsibilities except to stay alive can't live on a thousand dollars a
+year (I don't undertake to say just how he is going to get it), he'd
+better go into some other business."
+
+"Then you don't think," I said, "that literature has lost through the
+poverty of poets?"
+
+"I certainly do believe that literature has lost through the poverty of
+poets," said Mr. Robinson. "I don't believe in poverty. I never did. I
+think it is good for a poet to be bumped and knocked around when he is
+young, but all the difficulties that are put in his way after he gets to
+be twenty-five or thirty are certain to take something out of his work.
+I don't see how they can do anything else.
+
+"Some time ago you asked me," said Mr. Robinson, "how I accounted for
+our difficulty in making a correct estimate of the poetry of one's own
+time. The question is a difficult one. I don't even say that it has an
+answer. But the solution of the thing seems to me to be related to what
+I said about the quality of finality that seems to exist in all real
+poetry. Finality seems always to have had a way of not obtruding itself
+to any great extent."
+
+
+
+
+_LET POETRY BE FREE_
+
+JOSEPHINE PRESTON PEABODY
+
+
+Mrs. Lionel Marks--or Josephine Preston Peabody, to call her by the name
+which she has made famous--is a poet whose tendency has always been
+toward democracy. From _The Singing Leaves_, her first book of lyrics,
+to _The Piper_ (the dramatic poem which received the Stratford-on-Avon
+prize in 1910), and _The Wolf of Gubbio_, the poetic representation of
+events in St. Francis's life in her latest published book, she has
+chosen for her theme not fantastic and rare aspects of nature, nor the
+new answers of her own emotions, but things that are common to all
+normal mankind--such as love and religion. Also, without seeming to
+preach, she is always expressing her love for Liberty, Equality, and
+Fraternity, and although she never dwells upon the overworked term, she
+is as devoted an adherent of the brotherhood of man as was William
+Morris.
+
+Therefore I was eager to learn whether or not she held the
+opinion--often expressed during the past months--that poetry is becoming
+more democratic, less an art practised and appreciated by the chosen
+few. Also I wanted to know if she saw signs of this democratization of
+poetry in the development of free verse, or _vers libre_, as those who
+write it prefer to say, in the apparently growing tendency of poets to
+give up the use of rhyme and rhythm.
+
+"Certainly, poetry is steadily growing more democratic," said Mrs.
+Marks. "More people are writing poetry to-day than fifty years ago, and
+the appreciation of poetry is more general. Most poets of genuine
+calling are writing now with the world in mind as an audience, not
+merely for the entertainment of a little literary cult.
+
+"But I do not think that the _vers libre_ fad has any connection with
+this tendency, or with the development of poetry at all. Indeed, I do
+not think that the cult is growing; we hear more of it in the United
+States than we did a year or two ago, but that is chiefly because London
+and Paris have outworn its novelty, so the _vers libristes_ concentrate
+their energies on Chicago and New York.
+
+"I love some 'free verse.' Certainly, there may be times when a poet
+finds he can express his idea or his emotion better without rhyme and
+rhythm than with them. But verse that is ostentatiously free--free verse
+that obviously has been made deliberately--that is a highly artificial
+sort of writing, bears no more relation to literature than does an
+acrostic. Neither the themes nor the methods of those who call
+themselves _vers libristes_ are democratic; they are, in the worst sense
+of the word, the sense which came into use at the time of the French
+Revolution, aristocratic.
+
+"The canon of the _vers libristes_ is essentially aristocratic. They
+contend, absurdly enough, that all traditional forms of rhyme and rhythm
+constitute a sort of bondage, and therefore they arbitrarily rule them
+out. Not for them are the fetters that bound Shelley's spirit to the
+earth! Also they arbitrarily rule out what they call, with their
+fondness for labels, the 'sociological note,' 'didacticism,'
+'meanings'--any ideas or emotions, in fact, that may be called communal
+or democratic.
+
+"My own canon is that all themes are fit for poetry and that all methods
+must justify themselves. If I may be permitted to make a clumsy
+wooden-toy apothegm I would say that poetry is rhythmic without and
+within. If we turn Carlyle's sometimes cloudy prose inside out we find
+that it has a silver lining of poetry.
+
+"Neither can I understand why the _vers libristes_ believe that their
+sort of writing is new. Leopardi wrote what would be called good
+_imagisme_, although the _imagistes_ do not seem to be aware of the
+fact, and the theory that rhyme is undesirable in poetry has appeared
+sporadically time and again in the history of poetry. When Sir Philip
+Sidney was alive there were pedants who argued against the use of rhyme,
+and some of them confuted their own arguments by writing charming lyrics
+in the traditional manner. By dint of reading the fine eye-cracking
+print in the Globe Edition of Spenser I found that the author of the
+_Faerie Queen_ at one time took seriously Gabriel Harvey's arguments
+against rhyme and made an unbelievably frightful experiment in rhymeless
+verse--as bad as the parodists of our band-wagon.
+
+"The other day I asked some one in the Greek department of Harvard how
+to read a fragment of Sappho's that I wanted to teach my children to
+say. He said that no one nowadays could know how certain of Sappho's
+poems really should be read, because the music for them had been lost,
+and they were all true lyrics, meant to be sung and sung by Sappho to
+music of her own making. So you see that poets who avowedly make verses
+that can appeal only to the eye, successions of images, in which the
+position of the words on the page is of great importance, believe that
+they are the successors of poets whose work was meant not to be read,
+but to be sung, whose verses fitted the regular measure of music.
+
+"As I said before," said Mrs. Marks, smiling, "I have no objection to
+free verse when it is a spontaneous expression. But I do object to free
+verse when it is organized into a cult that denies other freedoms to
+other poets! And I object to the bigotry of some of the people who are
+trying to impose free verse upon an uninterested world.
+
+"And also I object to the unfairness of some of the advocates of free
+verse. When they compare free verse, and what I suppose I must call
+chained verse, they take the greatest example of unrhymed poetry that
+they can find--the King James version of the Book of Job, perhaps--and
+say: 'This is better than "Yankee Doodle." Therefore, free verse is
+better than traditional verse.'
+
+"You see," said Mrs. Marks, "the commonest thing there is, I may say the
+most democratic thing, is the rhythm of the heart-beat. A true poet
+cannot ignore this. At the greatest times in his life, when he is filled
+with joy or despair, or when he has a sense of portent, man is aware of
+his heart, of its beat, of its recurrent tick, tick; he is aware of the
+rhythm of life. When we are dying, perhaps the only sense that remains
+with us is the sense of rhythm--the feeling that the grains of sand are
+running, running, running out.
+
+"The pulse-beat is a tremendous thing. It is the basis of all that men
+have in common. All life is locked up in its regularly recurrent rhythm.
+And it is that rhythm that appears in our love-songs, our war-songs, in
+all the poetry of the human cycle from lullabies to funeral chants. In
+the great moments of life men feel that they must be sharing, that they
+must have something in common with other men, and so their emotions
+crystallize into the ritual of rhythm, which is the most democratic
+thing that there is.
+
+"Primitive poetry, poetry that comes straight from the hearts of the
+people, sometimes circulating for generations without being committed to
+paper, is strongly traditional. The convention of regular rhyme and
+rhythm is never absent. What could be more conventional and more
+democratic than the old ballad, with its recurrent refrain in which the
+audience joined? Centuries ago in the Scotch Highlands the
+ballad-makers, like the men who wrote the 'Come-all-ye's' in our
+great-grandfather's time, used regular rhyme and rhythm. And if these
+poets were not democratic, then there never was such a thing as a
+democratic poet."
+
+"But is it not true," I asked, "that Whitman is considered the most
+democratic poet of his day, and that his avoidance of rhyme and regular
+rhythm is advanced as proof of his democracy?"
+
+"Whitman," said Mrs. Marks, "was a democrat in principle, but not in
+poetic practice. He loved humanity, but he still waits to reach his
+widest audience because his verse lacks strongly stressed, communal
+music. The only poems which he wrote that really reached the hearts of
+the people quickly are those which are most nearly traditional in
+form--_When Lilacs Last in Dooryards Bloomed_ and _Captain, My Captain!_
+in which he used rhyme.
+
+"You see, nothing else establishes such a bond with memory as rhyme.
+
+"Did you ever think," said Mrs. Marks, suddenly, "that the truest
+exuberance of life always expresses itself rhythmically? Children are
+generous with the most intricate rhythms; they do not eat ice-cream in
+the disorderly grown-up way; they eat it in a pattern, turning the
+saucer around and around; they skit alternate flagstones or every third
+step on the stairway. Because they are overflowing with life they
+express themselves in rhythm. _Vers libre_ is too grown-up to be the
+most vital poetry; one of the ways in which the poet must be like a
+little child is in possessing an exuberance of life. His life must
+overflow.
+
+"The poets especially remember that Christ said, 'I am come that ye
+might have life and that ye might have it more abundantly.'
+
+"The rhythm of life," said Mrs. Marks, thoughtfully. "The rhythm of
+life. Who is conscious of his heart-beats except at the great moments of
+life, and who is unconscious of them then? The music of poetry is the
+witness of that intense moment when there is discovered to man or woman,
+when there reverberates through his brain and being, the tremendous
+rhythm and refrain whereby we live."
+
+Mrs. Marks has no patience with those who use the term "sociological" in
+depreciation of all poetry that is not intensely subjective and
+personal.
+
+"There are some critics," she said, "who would condemn the Lord's Prayer
+as 'sociological' because it begins 'Our Father' instead of 'My Father.'
+
+"The true poet must be a true democrat; he must, if he can, share with
+all the world the vision that lights him; he must be in sympathy with
+the people. The war has made a great many European poets aware of this
+fact. Think how the war changed Rupert Brooke, for instance? He had been
+a most aristocratic poet, making poems, some of which could only repel
+minds less in love with the fantastic. But he shared the great emotion
+of his countrymen, and so he wrote out of his deeply wakened, sudden
+simplicity those sonnets which they all can understand and must forever
+cherish.
+
+"The war will help make poetry. It has swept away the fads and cults
+from Europe; they find a peaceful haven in the United States, but they
+will not live as dogmas. In the democracy that is soon to come may all
+'isms' founder and lose themselves! And may all true freedoms come into
+their own, with the maker, his mind and his tools."
+
+
+
+
+_THE HERESY OF SUPERMANISM_
+
+CHARLES RANN KENNEDY
+
+
+"But, of course," said Charles Rann Kennedy, violently (he says most
+things rather violently), "you understand that the war's most important
+effect on literature was clearly evident long before the war began!"
+
+I did not understand this statement, and said so. Thereupon the author
+of _The Servant in the House_ and _The Terrible Meek_ said:
+
+"We have so often been told that great events cast their shadows before,
+that the tremendous truth of the phrase has ceased to impress us. The
+war which began in August, 1914, exercised a tremendous influence over
+the mind of the world in 1913, 1912, 1911, and 1910. The great wave of
+religious thought which swept over Europe and America during those years
+was caused by the approach of the war. The tremendous pacifist
+movement--not the weak, bloodless pacifism of the poltroon, but the
+heroic, flaming pacifism of the soldier-hearted convinced of sin--was a
+protest against the menacing injustice of the war; it was the world's
+shudder of dread.
+
+"The literature of the first decade of the twentieth century was more
+thoroughly and obviously influenced by the war than will be that of the
+decade following. Think of that amazing quickening of the conscience of
+the French nation, a quickening which found expression in the novels of
+Rene Bazin, the immortal ballads of Francis Jammes, and in the work of
+countless other writers! These people were preparing themselves and
+their fellow-countrymen for the mighty ordeal which was before them.
+
+"It is blasphemous to say that the war can only affect things that come
+after it; to say that is to attempt to limit the powers of God. There
+are, of course, some writers who can only feel the influence of a thing
+after it has become evident; after they have carefully studied and
+absorbed it. But there are others, the manikoi, the prophetic madmen,
+who are swayed by what is to happen rather than by what has happened.
+I'm one of them.
+
+"The war held me in its spell long before the German troops crossed
+Belgian soil. I wrote my _The Terrible Meek_ by direct inspiration from
+heaven in Holy Week, 1912.
+
+"I put that in," said Mr. Kennedy (who looks very much like Gilbert K.
+Chesterton's _Man-alive_), suddenly breaking off the thread of his
+discourse, "not only because I know that it is the absolute truth, but
+because of the highly entertaining way in which it is bound to be
+misinterpreted.
+
+"New York's dramatic critics, the Lord Chamberlain of England, the
+military authorities of Germany and Great Britain--all these people were
+charmingly unanimous in finding _The Terrible Meek_ blasphemous,
+villainous, poisonous. Even the New York MacDowell Club, after two
+stormy debates, decided to omit all mention of _The Terrible Meek_ from
+its bulletin. Perhaps this was not entirely because the play was
+'sacrilegious'; the club may possibly have been influenced by the fact
+that its author was a loud person with long hair, who told unpleasant
+truths in reputable gatherings. And copies of the published book of the
+play, which were accompanied by friendly letters from the author, were
+refused by every monarch now at war in Europe!
+
+"But in 1914 and 1915 _The Terrible Meek_ suddenly found, to its own
+amazement, that it had become a respectable play! Its connection with
+the present war became evident. It has been the subject of countless
+leading articles; it has been read, and even acted, in thousands of
+churches. On the occasion of the first production of the despised play
+in New York City, my wife and I received a small pot of roses from a
+girls' school which we sometimes visit. In due time this was planted by
+the porch of our summer home in Connecticut. This year--three years only
+after its planting--the rose-tree covers three-quarters of the big
+porch, and last summer it bore thousands of blooms. Now these things are
+a parable!
+
+"No, the Lord does not have to wait until the beginnings of mighty wars
+for them vitally to influence the literature of the world. Upon some of
+us He places the burden of the coming horror years before.
+
+"Although I am and always have been violently opposed to war, I cannot
+help observing what this war has already commenced to do for literature.
+It is killing Supermanism--and I purposely call it by that name to
+distinguish it from the mere actual doctrine that Nietzsche may or may
+not have taught. The damnable heresy, as it historically happened among
+us, was already beginning to influence very badly most of our young
+writers. Clever devilism caught the trick of it too easily. Now, heresy
+is sin always and everywhere; and this heresy was a particularly black
+and deadly kind of sin. It ate into the very heart of our life.
+
+"And yet there was a reason, almost an excuse, for the power which the
+Superman idea got over the minds of writers after Bernard Shaw's first
+brilliant and engaging popularization of it. And the excuse is that
+Supermanism, with its emphasis on strength and courage and life, was to
+a great extent a healthy and almost inevitable reaction from the maudlin
+milk-and-water sort of theology and morals that had been apologetically
+handed out to us by weak-kneed religious teachers.
+
+"We had too much of the 'gentle Jesus' of the Sunday-school. In our maze
+of evil Protestantisms, we had lost sight of the real Son of God who is
+Jesus Christ. We had lost the terrible and lovely doctrine of the wrath
+of the Lamb.
+
+"And so a great many writers turned to Supermanism with a shout of
+relief. They were sick of milk and water, and this seemed to be strong
+wine. But Supermanism is heresy, and it rapidly spread over the world,
+most perniciously influencing all intellectual life.
+
+"And there were so many things to help Supermanism! There was the
+general acceptance of the doctrine of biological necessity as an
+argument for war--Bernhardi actually used that phrase, I believe--the
+idea that affairs of the spirit are determined exteriorly. There was the
+acceptance of various extraordinary interpretations of Darwin's theory
+of evolution! Every little man called himself a scientist, and took his
+own little potterings-about very seriously. Everything had to be a
+matter of observation, these little fellows said; they would believe
+only what they saw. They didn't know that real scientists always begin
+_a priori_, that real scientists always know the truth first and then
+set about to prove it.
+
+"Well, all these people helped the heresy of Supermanism along. But the
+people who helped it along chiefly were the apologetic Christians, who
+should have combated it with fire and sword. It was helped along by the
+sort of Christian who calls himself 'liberal' and 'progressive,' the
+sort of Christian who says, 'Of course, I'm not orthodox.' When any one
+says that to me, I always answer him in the chaste little way which so
+endears me to my day and generation: 'Hell, aren't you? I hope I am!'
+
+"This sort of so-called Christian helps Supermanism in two ways. In the
+first place, the 'progressive' Christians are great connoisseurs of
+heresy, they simply love any new sort of blasphemous philosophy, whether
+it comes from Germany or Upper Tooting. They love to try to assimilate
+all the new mad and wicked ideas, and graft them on Christianity. I
+suppose it's their idea of making the Lord Jesus Christ up to date and
+attractive. They love to try to engrave pretty patterns on the Rock of
+Ages. And Supermanism was to them a new and alluring pattern.
+
+"Of course a Supermanism might be worked out on strictly Christian
+lines, the Superman in that case being the Christ. But that is not the
+way in which the theory has historically worked out. No! Mr. Superman as
+we've actually known him in the world recently is the Beast that was
+taken, and with him the false prophets that wrought miracles before him,
+with which he had deceived them that had received the mark of the Beast
+and them that had worshiped his image. And these, in the terrible
+symbolism of St. John, you will remember, got fire and brimstone for
+their pains! As now!
+
+"Then there was your Christian Supermanism that tried to get up a weak
+little imitation of the wrath of the Lamb. This was your bastard by
+theatricality and popularity out of so-called muscular Christianity. Not
+the virile 'muscular Christianity' of Charles Kingsley, mind you--a
+power he won almost alone, by blood and tears; but the 'safe' thing of
+the after generation, the 'all things to all men'--when success was well
+assured. This is your baseball Christianity, the Christianity of the
+'punch,' of the piled-up heap of dollars, of the commercially counted
+'conversions' and the rest of the blasphemies! Christ deliver us from
+it, if needs be, even by fire!
+
+"Well, Supermanism cast its shadow over all forms of literary
+expression. The big and the little mockers all fell under its
+spell--they had their fling at Christianity in their novels, their
+plays, their poems. In the novel Supermanism was evident not so much in
+direct attacks on Christianity as in a brutal and pitiless realism.
+Perhaps some of this hard realism was a natural reaction from the
+eye-piping sentimentality of some of the Victorian writers. But most of
+it was merely Supermanism in fiction--pessimism, egotism, fatalism,
+cruelty.
+
+"One thing to be said for the Christian Scientists, the Mental Healers,
+the New Thought people generally, is that they did a real service
+through all this bad time by refusing to recognize any such heresy as
+biological determination as applied to things spiritual. They really did
+teach man's freedom up there in the heavens where he properly belongs.
+They refused to be bound by the earth, and all the appearances and the
+exterior causes thereof. Their Superman, if they ever used the phrase,
+was at least the Healer, the spirit spent for others, not for self.
+
+"If you were to ask me what were the war's most conspicuous effects on
+literature just at present, I would say conviction of sin, repentance
+and turning to God. There can be no suggestion of Supermanism in our
+literature now. We have rediscovered the Christian Virtues. If a man
+writes something about blond-beasting through the world for his own
+good, all we have to do is to stick up in front of his eyes a crucifix.
+For the world has seen courage and self-abnegation of the kind that
+Christ taught--it has seen men throw their lives away. The war has
+shown the world that the man who will throw away his life is braver and
+stronger and greater than the man who plunges forward to safety over the
+lives of others. The world has learned that he who loses his life shall
+gain it.
+
+"The war has thrown a clear light upon Christianity, and now all the
+little apologetic 'progressive' Christians see that the world had never
+reacted against orthodox Christianity as such, but only against the
+bowelless unbelief which masqueraded as Christianity. We have had so
+many ministers who talked about Christ as they would have talked about
+kippered herrings--even with less enthusiasm. But now any one who speaks
+or writes about Christianity after this will have to know that he has to
+do with something terribly real.
+
+"Of course, during the war the only people who can write about it are
+those who are in the red-hot period of youth. Young men of genius write
+in times of stress. The war forces genius to flower prematurely--that is
+how we got the noble sonnets of Rupert Brooke.
+
+"And after the war will come to the making of literature the man who has
+conquered pain and agony. And that is the real Superman, the Christian
+Superman, the Superman who has always been the normal ideal of the
+world. Carlyle's Superman was nearer the truth than was Nietzsche's, for
+Carlyle's Superman idea was grounded in courage and sacrifice and love;
+his Superman was some one worth fighting for and dying for. And the war
+is showing us that this is the true Superman, if we want to save the
+world for nobler ends.
+
+"And the war, I believe, will do away with the tommy-rotten objection to
+'message' in literature. Don't misunderstand me. Of course, we all
+object to the stupid 'story with a purpose' in the Sunday-school sense
+of that phrase. We don't want literature used as a sugar-coating around
+the illuminating lesson that God loves little Willie because he fed the
+dicky-birds and didn't say 'damn'! Yet we want literature to awake again
+and be as always in the great days--a message. Literature must be a
+direct message from the heart of the author to the heart of the world.
+The _Prometheus Vinctus_ was such a message. So also the _Antigone_. All
+Greek drama was.
+
+"All the little literary and artistic cults are dead or dying. The idea
+of literature as a thing distinct from life is dead. Writers can never
+again think of themselves as a race separate from the rest of humanity.
+All the artificial Bohemias have been destroyed, and can never again
+exist; for now at last the new world is about to dawn. Christ is coming.
+
+"And yet this war has made evident the importance of literature. It has
+made words real again. It has shown that men cannot live forever on a
+lie, written or spoken. God has come upon us like a thief in the night,
+and He has judged by our words. Some of us He has turned to madness and
+the vain babblings of heathendom. I am no wild chauvinist; though a man,
+English-born, it gives me no joy to speak of Germans as Huns, and to
+heap up hate and indignation against them. Nor in my wildest flights of
+romanticism can I dream that an England yet possessing Lord Northcliffe
+and the present Government can be all that God might call delightful.
+Mr. Superman has invaded England right enough, that I sadly know; and
+Prussianism is not all in Potsdam.
+
+"Yet it is significant, in view of the Superman's birthplace, in view of
+the fact that the German people have very largely accepted his doctrine
+and ideal, that the men who stand for speech among them, in their public
+manifestoes have been delivered over unto confusion and a lie. The
+logician has been illogical, the literary artist rendered without form
+and void. Their very craft has turned to impotence and self-destruction.
+I repeat, this is no happiness to me. Rather, I think of the Germany I
+have loved, and I weep for the pity of it all. I am no friend of kings
+and kaisers and bankers and grocers and titled newspaper editors, that I
+should make their bloodiness mine. But I cannot help but see the sign of
+God written across the heavens in words of living fire.
+
+"As I said in _The Terrible Meek_: 'There is great power in words. All
+the things that ever get done in the world, good or bad, are done by
+words.'
+
+"What we'll have to rediscover is that literature, like life, begins
+with the utterance of a word. And until people realize once again that a
+word is no mere dead thing buried in a dictionary, but the actual,
+awful, wonderful Life of God Himself, we shall neither have nor deserve
+to have a literature!"
+
+
+
+
+_THE MASQUE AND DEMOCRACY_
+
+PERCY MACKAYE
+
+
+The community masque, _Caliban by the Yellow Sands_, is primarily
+intended to honor the memory of Shakespeare on the three-hundredth
+anniversary of his death. But its significance goes further than the
+purpose of commemoration. Mr. Percy MacKaye, the author, tells me that
+he sees his masque as part of a movement which shall bring poetry to the
+service of the entire community, which shall make poetry democratic, in
+the best sense of the word, and that the result of this movement will be
+to create conditions likely to produce out of the soil of America a
+great renascence of the drama.
+
+Mr. MacKaye undoubtedly is the busiest poet in the United States of
+America. When he talked to me about the significance of the community
+masque, rehearsals of the various groups that are to take part in it
+were going on all over the city. Every few minutes he was called away
+to confer with some of the directors of the masque, or some of the
+actors taking part in it. For a while Mr. John Drew was with us, talking
+of his appearance, in the character of Shakespeare, in epilogue. Mr.
+Robert Edmund Jones, the designer of the inner scenes, brought over some
+new drawings, and there were telephone conversations about music and
+costumes and other important details of the monster production.
+
+"The fact," said Mr. MacKaye, "that the masque is a poem primarily
+intended to be heard rather than to be read, is itself a movement toward
+the earlier and more democratic uses of poetry. Poetry appeals
+essentially to the ear, and is an art of the spoken word, yet, on
+account of our conditions of life, the written word is considered
+poetry.
+
+"This was not true in Shakespeare's time. And in the sort of work that I
+am doing is shown a return to the old ideal. A masque is a poem that can
+be visualized and acted. First of all it must be a poem, otherwise it
+cannot be anything but a more or less warped work of art.
+
+"With much of the new movement in the theater I am heartily in sympathy;
+but the movement seems to me one-sided. A large part of it has to do
+with visualization. Emphasis is laid on the appeal to the eye rather
+than the appeal to the ear, because the men of genius, like Gordon
+Craig, who have been leaders in the movement, have been interested in
+that phase of dramatic presentation.
+
+"Now I think that this one-sidedness is regrettable. When Gordon Craig
+called his book on dramatic visualization _The Art of the Theater_ he
+was wrong. He should have called it 'An Art of the Theater.'
+
+"These men have neglected part of the human soul. They have forgotten
+that the greatest part of the appeal of a drama is to the ear. The ear
+brings up the most subtle of all life's associations and connotations.
+By means of the ear the motions and ideas are conjured up in the mind of
+the audience.
+
+"Now, while the new movement in the theater is visual in character, the
+new movement in poetry is, so to speak, audible. The American poets are
+insisting more and more on the importance of the spoken word in poetry,
+as distinct from its shadow on the printed page. Whether they write
+_vers libre_ or the usual rhymed forms, they appreciate the fact that
+they must write poems that will be effective when read aloud. Surely
+this is a wholesome movement, likely to tend more and more toward
+definite dramatic expression on the part of the poets, whether to
+audiences through actors on the stage, or to audiences gathered to hear
+the direct utterances of the poets themselves.
+
+"This being so, the stage tending more toward visualization, and poetry
+tending more and more toward the spoken word, where shall we look for
+the co-ordinating development? I think that we shall find it in the
+community masque. The community masque draws out of the unlabored and
+untrammeled resources of our national life its inspiration and its
+theme. It requires our young poets to get closely in touch with our
+national life, with our history and with contemporary attitudes and
+ideals. To do this it is first of all necessary to have the poetic
+vision. The great need of the day is of the poet trained in the art of
+the theater.
+
+"The pageant and the masque offer the ideal conditions for the rendering
+of poetry. The poet who writes the lyric may or may not ordinarily be
+the one to speak it. In the masque the one who speaks the poem is the
+one chosen to do so because of his special fitness for the task. I have
+chosen my actors for the Shakespeare masque with special reference to
+their ability to speak poetry."
+
+"But what has this to do," I asked, "with making poetry more
+democratic?"
+
+"For one thing," Mr. MacKaye answered, "it gives the poet a larger
+audience. People who never read poetry will listen to poetry when it is
+presented to them in dramatic form. I have found that the result of the
+presentation of a community masque is to interest in poetry a large
+number of people who had hitherto been deaf to its appeal. In St. Louis,
+when I started a masque, that queer word with a 'q' in it was understood
+by a comparatively small number. But after the masque was produced
+nearly every high-school boy and girl in the town was writing masques.
+
+"No one can observe the progress of the community masque without seeing
+that it is surely a most democratic art form. I read my St. Louis masque
+before assemblies of ministers, in negro high schools, before clubs of
+advertising-men, at I. W. W. meetings--before men of all conditions of
+life and shades of opinion. It afforded them a sort of spiritual and
+intellectual meeting-place, it gave them a common interest. Surely that
+is a democratic function.
+
+"The democracy of the masque was forcefully brought to my attention
+again at the recent dinner by Otto Kahn to the Mayor's Honorary
+Committee for the New York Shakespeare Celebration. After James M. Beck
+had made a speech, Morris Hillquit, also a member of the committee,
+arose and addressed the company. He pointed out more clearly than I have
+heard it done before that in this cause extremes of opinion met, that
+art was producing practical democracy.
+
+"And yet," said Mr. MacKaye, hastily, "the masque stands for the
+democracy of excellence, not the democracy of mediocrity. What is art
+but self-government, the harmonizing of the elements of the mind? There
+can be no art where there is no discipline, there can be no art where
+there is not a high standard of excellence.
+
+"As I said," he continued, "the original appeal of poetry was to the ear
+as well as to the eye. In the days when poetry was a more democratic art
+than it has been in our time and that of our fathers, the poet spoke his
+poems to a circle of enthralled listeners. The masque is spoken through
+many mouths, but it might be spoken or chanted by the bard himself.
+
+"There has never before been so great an opportunity for the revival of
+the poetic drama. Ordinarily when a poetic drama is presented the cast
+has been drawn from actors trained in the rendition of prose. Inevitably
+the tendency has been for them to give a prose value to the lines of
+poetry. In selecting a cast for a masque, special attention is given to
+the ability of the actors to speak poetry, so the poem is presented as
+the poet intended.
+
+"It may be that the pageant and masque movement represents the full
+flowering of the renascence of poetry which all observers of
+intellectual events have recognized. But these movements are perennial;
+I do not like to think of a renascence of poetry because I do not think
+that poetry has been dead. I feel that it is desirable for the poets to
+become aware of the opportunities presented to them by the masque, the
+opportunities to combine the art of poetry with the art of the theater,
+and thus put poetry at the service of mankind.
+
+"I have felt that the Poetry Society of America, an organization whose
+activities certainly are stimulating and encouraging to every friend of
+the art, might serve poetry better if its members were to place more
+emphasis on creation and less on criticism. At their meetings now
+criticism is the dominant note. Poems written by the members are read
+aloud and criticized from the floor. This is excellent, in its place,
+but its effect is to lay stress on the critical function of the poet,
+which, after all, is not his main function. What the members of the
+Poetry Society should do is to seek co-operatively to create something.
+And for this the masque offers them a golden opportunity.
+
+"The flowering of poetry is a thing of infinite variety. There must be
+variety in a masque if the masque is to continue to be a worthy and
+popular art form. Standardization would be fatal to the masque, and I
+have stood out against it with all the power I possess. The masque and
+the pageant must not degenerate into traveling shows, done according to
+a fixed receipt. There must be the vision in it, and when the people see
+the vision they respond marvelously."
+
+Percy MacKaye is the son of Steele MacKaye, the author of _Hazel Kirke_
+and other popular plays. From the very beginning of his literary career
+his chief ambition has seemed to be to bring about a closer
+_rapprochement_ between poetry and the drama.
+
+When Mr. MacKaye was graduated from Harvard, in 1897, there were in that
+university no courses, technical or otherwise, in the modern drama. The
+official acceptance of his own commencement part _On the Need of
+Imagination in the Drama of To-day_ was the first official sanction of
+the subject, which was commented upon by the _Boston Transcript_ as
+something unprecedented in the annals of university discussion,
+especially of Harvard. It was not until seven or eight years had passed
+that Prof. George P. Baker began his courses in dramatic technique.
+
+The development of the pageant and the masque has been for years the
+object of Mr. MacKaye's tireless endeavors. He has spoken of the masque
+as "the potential drama of democracy." Two years ago in St. Louis he had
+his first technical opportunity on a large scale to experiment in
+devising this sort of communal entertainment. There, during five
+performances, witnessed by half a million people, some seven thousand
+citizens of St. Louis took part in his masque, in association with the
+pageant by Thomas Wood Stevens.
+
+"The outgoing cost of the St. Louis production," said Mr. MacKaye, "was
+$122,000; the income, $139,000. The balance of $17,000 has been devoted
+to a fund for civic art. If these seem large sums, we must look back to
+the days of the classic Greek drama and remember that the cost of
+producing a single play by Sophocles at Athens was $500,000.
+
+"The St. Louis production was truly a drama of, for, and by the people,
+a true community masque. _Caliban by the Yellow Sands_ is a community
+masque, given as the central popular expression of some hundreds of
+supplementary Shakespearian celebrations.
+
+"I call this work a masque, because it is a dramatic work of symbolism,
+involving in its structure pageantry, poetry, and the dance. But I have
+not thought to relate its structure to a historic form; I have simply
+sought by its structure to solve a problem of the art of the theater.
+That problem is the new one of creating a focus of dramatic technique
+for the growing but groping movement vaguely called 'pageantry,' which
+is itself a vital sign of social evolution--the half-desire of the
+people not merely to remain receptive to a popular art created by
+specialists, but to take part themselves in creating it; the
+desire,--that is, of democracy consistently to seek expression through
+a drama of and by the people, not merely for the people.
+
+"Six years ago, after the pageant-masque of the city of Gloucester,
+Massachusetts, I wrote, in _Scribner's Magazine_, an article in which I
+said that I found in the three American pageant-masques which I had seen
+recently, the Gloucester Pageant, the Masque at Aspet, and the
+California Redwood Festival, the expression of community spirit focused
+by co-operating artists in dramatic form. I said then, what I feel even
+more strongly after my work with the St. Louis Pageant and the
+Shakespearian Masque, that pageantry is poetry for the masses.
+
+"The parade of Election Day, the processions of Antics and Horribles on
+the Fourth of July and Thanksgiving Day, the May-Queen rituals of
+children--these make an elemental appeal to every one. What is this
+elemental appeal? Is it not the appeal of symbolism, the expression of
+life's meanings in sensuous form? Crude though it may be, pageantry
+satisfies an elemental instinct for art, a popular demand for poetry.
+This instinct and this demand, like other human instincts and demands,
+may be educated, refined, developed into a mighty agency of
+civilization. Refinement of this deep, popular instinct will result
+from a rational selection in correlation of the elements of pageantry.
+Painting, dancing, music, and sculpture (the last as applied to classic
+groupings) are appropriately the special arts for selecting those
+elements, and drama is the special art of correlating them.
+
+"The form of pageantry most popular and impressive in appeal as a fine
+art is that of the dramatic pageant, or masque. It is not limited to
+historic themes. All vital modern forces and institutions of our nation
+might appropriately find symbolic expression in the masque.
+
+"And in this would be seen the making of art democratic. Thus would the
+art of poetry and the art of the drama be put at the service of mankind.
+Artistic gifts, which now are individualized and dispersed, would be
+organized to express the labors and aspirations of communities,
+reviving, for the noblest humanism of our own times, the traditions of
+Leonardo da Vinci, Ben Jonson, and Inigo Jones. The development of the
+art of public masques, dedicated to civic education, would do more than
+any other agency to provide popular symbolic form and tradition for the
+stuff of a noble national drama. The present theaters cannot develop a
+public art, since they are dedicated to a private speculative business.
+The association of artists and civic leaders in the organization of
+public masques would tend gradually to establish a civic theater, owned
+by the people and conducted by artists, in every city of the nation.
+
+"I expressed these ideas," said Mr. MacKaye, "some years ago, before the
+pageant movement had reached its present pitch of popularity. All my
+experiences since that time have given me a firmer conviction that the
+masque is the drama of democracy, and I believe that the chief value of
+the Shakespearian masque is as a step forward in the progress of the
+co-operative dramatic and poetic expression of the people.
+
+"_Caliban by the Yellow Sands_ will be given at the City College Stadium
+May 23d, 24th, 25th, 26th, and 27th. After its New York performance it
+will be available for production elsewhere on a modified scale of stage
+performance. After June 1st it is planned that a professional company,
+which will co-operate with the local communities, will take the masque
+on tour.
+
+"The subtitle of _Caliban by the Yellow Sands_ is _A Community Masque of
+the Art of the Theater_, _Devised and Written to Commemorate the
+Tercentenary of the Death of Shakespeare_. The dramatic-symbolic motive
+of the masque I have taken from Scene 2 of Act I of _The Tempest_, where
+Prospero says:
+
+ It was mine art
+ When I arrived and heard thee, that made gape
+ The pine and let thee out.
+
+"The art of Prospero I have conceived as the art of Shakespeare in its
+universal scope--that many-visioned art of the theater, which age after
+age has come to liberate the imprisoned imagination of mankind from the
+fetters of brute force and ignorance; that same art which, being usurped
+or stifled by groping part-knowledge, prudery, or lust, has been botched
+in its ideal aims, and has wrought havoc, hypocrisy, and decadence.
+Caliban is in this masque that passionate child-curious part of us all,
+groveling close to his origin, yet groping up toward that serener plane
+of pity and love, reason, and disciplined will, on which Miranda and
+Prospero commune with Ariel and his spirits.
+
+"The theme of the masque--Caliban seeking to learn the art of
+Prospero--is, of course, the slow education of mankind through the
+influences of co-operative art--that is, of the art of the theater in
+its full social scope. This theme of co-operation is expressed earliest
+in the masque through the lyric of Ariel's Spirits taken from _The
+Tempest_; it is sounded, with central stress, in the chorus of peace
+when the kings clasp hands on the Field of the Cloth of Gold; and, with
+final emphasis, in the gathering together of the creative forces of
+dramatic art in the Epilogue.
+
+"So I have tried to make the masque bring that message of co-operation
+which I think all true art should bring. And the masque is the form
+which seems to me destined to bring about this desired co-operation, to
+bring back, perhaps, the conditions which existed in the spacious days
+of the great Greek drama. The growth in popularity of masques and
+pageants is preparing the way for a new race of poet dramatists, of
+poets who will use their knowledge of the art of the theater to
+interpret the people to themselves. And out of this new artistic
+democracy will come, let us hope, our new national poetry and our new
+national drama."
+
+THE END
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+
+
+TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES
+
+
+The duplicate book title and chapter titles have been removed. Also the
+following misprints have been corrected:
+
+ TOC: put in "Tippecanoe" without a hyphen (in "Tippecanoe
+ County, Indiana")
+
+ TOC: "Mackaye" changed to "MacKaye", as in all other instances
+ ("Percy Mackaye was born in New York City...")
+
+ p. 56: "countinent" changed to "continent" ("Yet in their time
+ these men set the whole countinent in a roar.")
+
+ p. 75: period is added after the middle initial W (ROBERT W.
+ CHAMBERS)
+
+ p. 78: period is added the following sentence: The most
+ imaginative and fantastic romances must have their basis in real
+ life.
+
+ p. 107: put in "dive-keeper" with a hyphen (no other instance in
+ the text)
+
+ p. 112: put in "soulless" without a hyphen (no other instances
+ in the text)
+
+ p. 178: opening double quote changed to single quote ('If ye had
+ not plowed with my heifer....)
+
+ p. 218: put in "catch-words" with a hyphen (no other instances
+ in the text)
+
+ p. 243: put in "motion-picture" with a hyphen (no other
+ instances in the text)
+
+ p. 247: put in "off-hand" with a hyphen ("I can think off-hand
+ of quite a group of writers....")
+
+ p. 283: put in "Dooryards" without a hyphen ("When Lilacs Last
+ in Dooryards Bloomed")
+
+ p. 293: put in "everywhere" without a hyphen ("heresy is sin
+ always and everywhere;")
+
+ p. 294: "Of couse" changed to "Of course" ("Of course, I'm not
+ orthodox.")
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Literature in the Making, by Various
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LITERATURE IN THE MAKING ***
+
+***** This file should be named 34313.txt or 34313.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/4/3/1/34313/
+
+Produced by Elizaveta Shevyakhova, Suzanne Shell and the
+Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
+(This file was produced from images generously made
+available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/34313.zip b/34313.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a632e76
--- /dev/null
+++ b/34313.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a3f13b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #34313 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/34313)