summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 20:02:57 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 20:02:57 -0700
commitbfba78b5b29ca2c8132929b6e66cdcb879783024 (patch)
tree4d5a56e7f26fd12c69b467f08e2dddc4fec96b3b
initial commit of ebook 35062HEADmain
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--35062-8.txt3715
-rw-r--r--35062-8.zipbin0 -> 68442 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h.zipbin0 -> 700842 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/35062-h.htm4869
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/cover.jpgbin0 -> 32697 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_001.jpgbin0 -> 14496 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_002.jpgbin0 -> 13690 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_003.jpgbin0 -> 6858 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_004.jpgbin0 -> 28629 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_005.jpgbin0 -> 30449 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_006.jpgbin0 -> 24808 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_007.jpgbin0 -> 58195 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_008.jpgbin0 -> 28734 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_009.jpgbin0 -> 31168 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_010.jpgbin0 -> 18974 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_011.jpgbin0 -> 27849 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_012.jpgbin0 -> 14938 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_013.jpgbin0 -> 8257 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_014.jpgbin0 -> 14213 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_015.jpgbin0 -> 40179 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_016.jpgbin0 -> 34744 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_017.jpgbin0 -> 17810 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_018.jpgbin0 -> 11255 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_019.jpgbin0 -> 10417 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_020.jpgbin0 -> 9434 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_021.jpgbin0 -> 9078 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_022.jpgbin0 -> 15929 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_023.jpgbin0 -> 26506 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_024.jpgbin0 -> 12609 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/fig_025.jpgbin0 -> 14433 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/frontispiece.jpgbin0 -> 33339 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062-h/images/t_page.jpgbin0 -> 45336 bytes
-rw-r--r--35062.txt3715
-rw-r--r--35062.zipbin0 -> 68410 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
37 files changed, 12315 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/35062-8.txt b/35062-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d8526c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3715 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Woodpeckers, by Fannie Hardy Eckstorm
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Woodpeckers
+
+Author: Fannie Hardy Eckstorm
+
+Release Date: January 25, 2011 [EBook #35062]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WOODPECKERS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Bryan Ness, Steve Read and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+[Illustration]
+
+
+
+
+ THE WOODPECKERS
+
+ BY
+
+ FANNIE HARDY ECKSTORM
+
+ WITH ILLUSTRATIONS
+
+[Illustration]
+
+ BOSTON AND NEW YORK
+ HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY
+ The Riverside Press, Cambridge
+ 1901
+
+
+
+
+COPYRIGHT, 1900, BY FANNIE HARDY ECKSTORM
+
+ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
+
+_To_ MY FATHER MR. MANLY HARDY _A Lifelong Naturalist_
+
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+
+ CHAP. PAGE
+
+ FOREWORD: THE RIDDLERS 1
+
+ I. HOW TO KNOW A WOODPECKER 4
+
+ II. HOW THE WOODPECKER CATCHES A GRUB 9
+
+ III. HOW THE WOODPECKER COURTS HIS MATE 15
+
+ IV. HOW THE WOODPECKER MAKES A HOUSE 20
+
+ V. HOW A FLICKER FEEDS HER YOUNG 24
+
+ VI. FRIEND DOWNY 28
+
+ VII. PERSONA NON GRATA. (YELLOW-BELLIED SAPSUCKER) 33
+
+ VIII. EL CARPINTERO. (CALIFORNIAN WOODPECKER) 46
+
+ IX. A RED-HEADED COUSIN. (RED-HEADED WOODPECKER) 55
+
+ X. A STUDY OF ACQUIRED HABITS 60
+
+ XI. THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS BILL 68
+
+ XII. THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS FOOT 77
+
+ XIII. THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS TAIL 86
+
+ XIV. THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS TONGUE 99
+
+ XV. HOW EACH WOODPECKER IS FITTED FOR HIS OWN
+ KIND OF LIFE 104
+
+ XVI. THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN 110
+
+ APPENDIX 113
+
+ A. KEY TO THE WOODPECKERS OF NORTH AMERICA 114
+
+ B. DESCRIPTIONS OF THE WOODPECKERS OF
+ NORTH AMERICA 117
+
+
+
+
+LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
+
+
+ PAGE
+
+ Flicker (colored) _Frontispiece_
+
+ Boring Larva 10
+
+ Indian Spear 12
+
+ Solomon Islander's Spear 13
+
+ Downy Woodpecker (colored) _facing_ 28
+
+ Bark showing Work of Sapsucker 34
+
+ Yellow-bellied Sapsucker (colored) _facing_ 34
+
+ Trunk of Tree showing Work of Californian Woodpecker 47
+
+ Californian Woodpecker (colored) _facing_ 48
+
+ Red-headed Woodpecker (colored) _facing_ 56
+
+ Head of the Lewis's Woodpecker 59
+
+ Head of Ivory-billed Woodpecker 70
+
+ Foot of Woodpecker 77
+
+ Diagram of Right Foot 79
+
+ Foot of Three-toed Woodpecker 80
+
+ Tail of Hairy Woodpecker 86
+
+ Tails of Brown Creeper and Chimney Swift 87
+
+ Middle Tail Feathers of Flicker, Ivory-billed
+ Woodpecker, and Hairy Woodpecker 89
+
+ Diagram of Curvature of Tails of Woodpeckers 90
+
+ Patterns of Tails 91
+
+ Under Side of Middle Tail Feather of
+ Ivory-billed Woodpecker 97
+
+ Tongue of Hairy Woodpecker 99
+
+ Tongue-bones of Flicker 100
+
+ Skull of Woodpecker, showing Bones of Tongue 101
+
+ Hyoids of Sapsucker and Golden-fronted Woodpecker 102
+
+ Diagram of Head of a Flicker 113
+
+_The colored illustrations are by Louis Agassiz Fuertes.
+ The text cuts are from drawings by John L. Ridgway._
+
+
+
+
+THE WOODPECKERS
+
+
+
+
+FOREWORD: THE RIDDLERS
+
+
+Long ago in Greece, the legend runs, a terrible monster called the
+Sphinx used to waylay travelers to ask them riddles: whoever could not
+answer these she killed, but the man who did answer them killed her and
+made an end of her riddling.
+
+To-day there is no Sphinx to fear, yet the world is full of unguessed
+riddles. No thoughtful man can go far afield but some bird or flower or
+stone bars his way with a question demanding an answer; and though many
+men have been diligently spelling out the answers for many years, and we
+for the most part must study the answers they have proved, and must
+reply in their words, yet those shrewd old riddlers, the birds and
+flowers and bees, are always ready for a new victim, putting their heads
+together over some new enigma to bar the road to knowledge till that,
+too, shall be answered; so that other men's learning does not always
+suffice. So much of a man's pleasure in life, so much of his power,
+depends on his ability to silence these persistent questioners, that
+this little book was written with the hope of making clearer the kind of
+questions Dame Nature asks, and the way to get correct answers.
+
+This is purposely a _little_ book, dealing only with a single group of
+birds, treating particularly only some of the commoner species of that
+group, taking up only a few of the problems that present themselves to
+the naturalist for solution, and aiming rather to make the reader
+_acquainted with_ the birds than _learned about_ them.
+
+The woodpeckers were selected in preference to any other family because
+they are patient under observation, easily identified, resident in all
+parts of the country both in summer and in winter, and because more than
+any other birds they leave behind them records of their work which may
+be studied after the birds have flown. The book provides ample means for
+identifying every species and subspecies of woodpecker known in North
+America, though only five of the commonest and most interesting species
+have been selected for special study. At least three of these five
+should be found in almost every part of the country. The Californian
+woodpecker is never seen in the East, nor the red-headed in the far
+West, but the downy and the hairy are resident nearly everywhere, and
+some species of the flickers and sapsuckers, if not always the ones
+chosen for special notice, are visitors in most localities.
+
+Look for the woodpeckers in orchards and along the edges of thickets,
+among tangles of wild grapes and in patches of low, wild berries, upon
+which they often feed, among dead trees and in the track of forest
+fires. Wherever there are boring larvæ, beetles, ants, grasshoppers, the
+fruit of poison-ivy, dogwood, june-berry, wild cherry or wild grapes,
+woodpeckers may be confidently looked for if there are any in the
+neighborhood. Be patient, persistent, wide-awake, sure that you see what
+you think you see, careful to remember what you have seen, studious to
+compare your observations, and keen to hear the questions propounded
+you. If you do this seven years and a day, you will earn the name of
+Naturalist; and if you travel the road of the naturalist with curious
+patience, you may some day become as famous a riddle-reader as was that
+Oedipus, the king of Thebes, who slew the Sphinx.
+
+
+
+
+I
+
+HOW TO KNOW A WOODPECKER
+
+
+The woodpecker is the easiest of all birds to recognize. Even if
+entirely new to you, you may readily decide whether a bird is a
+woodpecker or not.
+
+The woodpecker is always striking and is often gay in color. He is
+usually noisy, and his note is clear and characteristic. His shape and
+habits are peculiar, so that whenever you see a bird clinging to the
+side of a tree "as if he had been thrown at it and stuck," you may
+safely call him a woodpecker. Not that all birds which cling to the bark
+of trees are woodpeckers,--for the chickadees, the crested titmice, the
+nuthatches, the brown creepers, and a few others like the kinglets and
+some wrens and wood-warblers more or less habitually climb up and down
+the tree-trunks; but these do it with a pretty grace wholly unlike the
+woodpecker's awkward, cling-fast way of holding on. As the largest of
+these is smaller than the smallest woodpecker, and as none of them
+(excepting only the tiny kinglets) ever shows the patch of yellow or
+scarlet which always marks the head of the male woodpecker, and which
+sometimes adorns his mate, there is no danger of making mistakes.
+
+The nuthatches are the only birds likely to be confused with
+woodpeckers, and these have the peculiar habit of traveling down a
+tree-trunk with their heads pointing to the ground. A woodpecker never
+does this; he may move down the trunk of the tree he is working on, but
+he will do it by hopping backward. A still surer sign of the woodpecker
+is the way he sits upon his tail, using it to brace him. No other birds
+except the chimney swift and the little brown creeper ever do this. A
+sure mark, also, is his feet, which have two toes turned forward and two
+turned backward. We find this arrangement in no other North American
+birds except the cuckoos and our one native parroquet. However, there is
+one small group of woodpeckers which have but three toes, and these are
+the only North American land-birds that do not have four well-developed
+toes.
+
+In coloration the woodpeckers show a strong family likeness. Except in
+some young birds, the color is always brilliant and often is gaudy.
+Usually it shows much clear black and white, with dashes of scarlet or
+yellow about the head. Sometimes the colors are "solid," as in the
+red-headed woodpecker; sometimes they lie in close bars, as in the
+red-bellied species; sometimes in spots and stripes, as in the downy and
+hairy; but there is always a _contrast_, never any blending of hues. The
+red or yellow is laid on in well-defined patches--square, oblong, or
+crescentic--upon the crown, the nape, the jaws, or the throat; or else
+in stripes or streaks down the sides of the head and neck, as in the
+logcock, or pileated woodpecker.
+
+There is no rule about the color markings of the sexes, as in some
+families of birds. Usually the female lacks all the bright markings of
+the male; sometimes, as in the logcock, she has them but in more
+restricted areas; sometimes, as in the flickers, she has all but one of
+the male's color patches; and in a few species, as the red-headed and
+Lewis's woodpeckers, the two sexes are precisely alike in color. In the
+black-breasted woodpecker, sometimes called Williamson's sapsucker, the
+male and female are so totally different that they were long described
+and named as different birds. It sometimes happens that a young female
+will show the color marks of the male, but will retain them only the
+first year.
+
+Though the woodpeckers cling to the trunks of trees, they are not
+exclusively climbing birds. Some kinds, like the flickers, are quite as
+frequently found on the ground, wading in the grass like meadowlarks.
+Often we may frighten them from the tangled vines of the frost grape and
+the branches of wild cherry trees, or from clumps of poison-ivy, whither
+they come to eat the fruit. The red-headed woodpecker is fond of sitting
+on fence posts and telegraph poles; and both he and the flicker
+frequently alight on the roofs of barns and houses and go pecking and
+pattering over the shingles. The sapsuckers and several other kinds will
+perch on dead limbs, like a flycatcher, on the watch for insects; the
+flickers, and more rarely other kinds, will sit crosswise of a limb
+instead of crouching lengthwise of it, as is the custom with
+woodpeckers.
+
+All these points you will soon learn. You will become familiar with the
+form, the flight, and the calls of the different woodpeckers; you will
+learn not only to know them by name, but to understand their characters;
+they will become your acquaintances, and later on your friends.
+
+This heavy bird, with straight, chisel bill and sharp-pointed
+tail-feathers; with his short legs and wide, flapping wings, his
+unmusical but not disagreeable voice, and his heavy, undulating,
+business-like flight, is distinctly bourgeois, the type of a bird
+devoted to business and enjoying it. No other bird has so much work to
+do all the year round, and none performs his task with more energy and
+sense. The woodpecker makes no aristocratic pretensions, puts on none of
+the coy graces and affectations of the professional singer; even his gay
+clothes fit him less jauntily than they would another bird. He is
+artisan to the backbone,--a plain, hard-working, useful citizen,
+spending his life in hammering holes in anything that appears to need a
+hole in it. Yet he is neither morose nor unsocial. There is a vein of
+humor in him, a large reserve of mirth and jollity. We see little of it
+except in the spring, and then for a time all the laughter in him
+bubbles up; he becomes uproarious in his glee, and the melody which he
+cannot vent in song he works out in the channels of his trade, filling
+the woodland with loud and harmonious rappings. Above all other birds he
+is the friend of man, and deserves to have the freedom of the fields.
+
+
+
+
+II
+
+HOW THE WOODPECKER CATCHES A GRUB
+
+
+Did you ever see a hairy woodpecker strolling about a tree for what he
+could pick up?
+
+There is a _whur-r-rp_ of gay black and white wings and the flash of a
+scarlet topknot as, with a sharp cry, he dashes past you, strikes the
+limb solidly with both feet, and instantly sidles behind it, from which
+safe retreat he keeps a sharp black eye fixed upon your motions. If you
+make friends with him by keeping quiet, he will presently forgive you
+for being there and hop to your side of the limb, pursuing his ordinary
+work in the usual way, turning his head from side to side, inspecting
+every crevice, and picking up whatever looks appetizing. Any knot or
+little seam in the bark is twice scanned; in such places moths and
+beetles lay their eggs. Little cocoons are always dainty morsels, and
+large cocoons contain a feast. The butterfly-hunter who is hoping to
+hatch out some fine cecropia moths knows well that a large proportion of
+all the cocoons he discovers will be empty. The hairy woodpecker has
+been there before him, and has torn the chrysalis out of its silken
+cradle. For this the farmer should thank him heartily, even if the
+butterfly-hunter does not, for the cecropia caterpillar is destructive.
+
+But sometimes, on the fair bark of a smooth limb, the woodpecker stops,
+listens, taps, and begins to drill. He works with haste and energy,
+laying open a deep hole. For what? An apple-tree borer was there cutting
+out the life of the tree. The farmer could see no sign of him; neither
+could the woodpecker, but he could hear the strong grub down in his
+little chamber gnawing to make it longer, or, frightened by the heavy
+footsteps on his roof, scrambling out of the way.
+
+[Illustration: Boring larva.]
+
+It is easy to hear the borer at work in the tree. When a pine forest has
+been burned and the trees are dead but still standing, there will be
+such a crunching and grinding of borers eating the dead wood that it can
+be heard on all sides many yards away. Even a single borer can sometimes
+be heard distinctly by putting the ear to the tree. Sound travels much
+farther through solids than it does through air; notice how much farther
+you can hear a railroad train by the click of the rails than by the
+noise that comes on the air. Even our dull ears can detect the woodworm,
+but we cannot locate him. How, then, is the woodpecker to do what we
+cannot do?
+
+Doubtless experience teaches him much, but one observer suggests that
+the woodpecker places the grub by the sense of touch. He says he has
+seen the red-headed woodpecker drop his wings till they trailed along
+the branch, as if to determine where the vibrations in the wood were
+strongest, and thus to decide where the grub was boring. But no one else
+appears to have noticed that woodpeckers are in the habit of trailing
+their wings as they drill for grubs. It would be a capital study for one
+to attempt to discover whether the woodpecker locates his grub by
+feeling, or whether he does it by hearing alone. Only one should be sure
+he is looking for grubs and not for beetles' eggs, nor for ants, nor for
+caterpillars. By the energy with which he drills, and the size of the
+hole left after he has found his tidbit, one can decide whether he was
+working for a borer.
+
+But when the borer has been located, he has yet to be captured. There
+are many kinds of borers. Some channel a groove just beneath the bark
+and are easily taken; but others tunnel deep into the wood. I measured
+such a hole the other day, and found it was more than eight inches long
+and larger than a lead-pencil, bored through solid rock-maple wood. The
+woodpecker must sink a hole at right angles to this channel and draw the
+big grub out through his small, rough-sided hole. You would be
+surprised, if you tried to do the same with a pair of nippers the size
+of the woodpecker's bill, to find how strong the borer is, how he can
+buckle and twist, how he braces himself against the walls of his house.
+Were your strength no greater than the woodpecker's, the task would be
+much harder. Indeed, a large grub would stand a good chance of getting
+away but for one thing, the woodpecker _spears_ him, and thereby saves
+many a dinner for himself.
+
+[Illustration: Indian spear.]
+
+Here is a primitive Indian fish-spear, such as the Penobscots used. To
+the end of a long pole two wooden jaws are tied loosely enough to spring
+apart a little under pressure, and midway between them, firmly driven
+into the end of the pole, is a point of iron. When a fish was struck,
+the jaws sprung apart under the force of the blow, guiding the iron
+through the body of the fish, which was held securely in the hollow
+above, that just fitted around his sides, and by the point itself.
+
+[Illustration: Solomon Islander's spear.]
+
+The tool with which the woodpecker fishes for a grub is very much the
+same. His mandibles correspond to the two movable jaws. They are
+knife-edged, and the lower fits exactly inside the upper, so that they
+give a very firm grip. In addition, the upper one is movable. All birds
+can move the upper mandible, because it is hinged to the skull. (Watch a
+parrot some day, if you do not believe it.) A medium-sized woodpecker,
+like the Lewis's, can elevate his upper mandible at least a quarter of
+an inch without opening his mouth at all. This enables him to draw his
+prey through a smaller hole than would be needed if he must open his
+jaws along their whole length. Between the mandibles is the
+sharp-pointed tongue, which can be thrust entirely through a grub,
+holding him impaled. Unlike the Indian's spear-point, the woodpecker's
+tongue is barbed heavily on both sides, and it is extensile. As a tool
+it resembles the Solomon Islander's spear. A medium-sized woodpecker can
+dart his tongue out two inches or more beyond the tip of his bill. A New
+Bedford boy might tell us, and very correctly, that the woodpecker
+_harpoons_ his grub, just as a whaleman harpoons a whale. If the grub
+tries to back off into his burrow, out darts the long, barbed tongue and
+spears him. Then it drags him along the crooked tunnel and into the
+narrow shaft picked by the woodpecker, where the strong jaws seize and
+hold him firmly.
+
+
+
+
+III
+
+HOW THE WOODPECKER COURTS HIS MATE
+
+
+Other birds woo their mates with songs, but the woodpecker has no voice
+for singing. He cannot pour out his soul in melody and tell his love his
+devotion in music. How do songless birds express their emotions? Some by
+grotesque actions and oglings, as the horned owl, and some by frantic
+dances, as the sharp-tailed grouse, woo and win their mates; but the
+amorous woodpecker, not excepting the flickers, which also woo by
+gestures, whacks a piece of seasoned timber, and rattles off
+interminable messages according to the signal code set down for
+woodpeckers' love affairs. He is the only instrumental performer among
+the birds; for the ruffed grouse, though he drums, has no drum.
+
+There is no cheerier spring sound, in our belated Northern season, than
+the quick, melodious rappings of the sapsucker from some dead ash limb
+high above the meadow. It is the best performance of its kind: he knows
+the capabilities of his instrument, and gets out of it all the music
+there is in it. Most if not all woodpeckers drum occasionally, but
+drumming is the special accomplishment of the sapsucker. He is easily
+first. In Maine, where they are abundant, they make the woods in
+springtime resound with their continual rapping. Early in April, before
+the trees are green with leaf, or the pussy-willows have lost their
+silky plumpness, when the early round-leafed yellow violet is cuddling
+among the brown, dead leaves, I hear the yellow-bellied sapsucker along
+the borders of the trout stream that winds down between the mountains.
+The dead branch of an elm-tree is his favorite perch, and there,
+elevated high above all the lower growth, he sits rolling forth a flood
+of sound like the tremolo of a great organ. Now he plays
+staccato,--detached, clear notes; and now, accelerating his time, he
+dashes through a few bars of impetuous hammerings. The woods reëcho with
+it; the mountains give it faintly back. Beneath him the ruffed grouse
+paces back and forth on his favorite mossy log before he raises the
+palpitating whirr of his drumming. A chickadee digging in a rotten limb
+pauses to spit out a mouthful of punky wood and the brown _Vanessa_,
+edged with yellow, first butterfly of the season, flutters by on
+rustling wings. So spring arrives in Maine, ushered in by the reveille
+of the sapsucker.
+
+So ambitious is the sapsucker of the excellence of his performance that
+no instrument but the best will satisfy him. He is always experimenting,
+and will change his anvil for another as soon as he discovers one of
+superior resonance. They say he tries the tin pails of the maple-sugar
+makers to see if these will not give him a clearer note; that he drums
+on tin roofs and waterspouts till he loosens the solder and they come
+tumbling down. But usually he finds nothing so near his liking as a
+hard-wood branch, dead and barkless, the drier, the harder, the thinner,
+the finer grained, so much the better for his uses.
+
+Deficient as they are in voice, the woodpeckers do not lack a musical
+ear. Mr. Burroughs tells us that a downy woodpecker of his acquaintance
+used to change his key by tapping on a knot an inch or two from his
+usual drumming place, thereby obtaining a higher note. Alternating
+between the two places, he gave to his music the charm of greater
+variety. The woodpeckers very quickly discover the superior conductivity
+of metals. In parts of the country where woodpeckers are more abundant
+than good drumming trees, a tin roof proves an almost irresistible
+attraction. A lightning-rod will sometimes draw them farther than it
+would an electric bolt; and a telegraph pole, with its tinkling glasses
+and ringing wires, gives them great satisfaction. If men did not put
+their singing poles in such public places, their music would be much
+more popular with the woodpeckers; but even now the birds often venture
+on the dangerous pastime and hammer you out a concord of sweet sounds
+from the mellow wood-notes, the clear peal of the glass, and the ringing
+overtones of the wires.
+
+The flicker often telegraphs his love by tapping either on a forest tree
+or on some loose board of a barn or outhouse; but he has other ways of
+courting his lady. On fine spring mornings, late in April, I have seen
+them on a horizontal bough, the lady sitting quietly while her lover
+tried to win her approval by strange antics. Quite often there are two
+males displaying their charms in open rivalry, but once I saw them when
+the field was clear. If fine clothes made a gentleman, this brave wooer
+would have been first in all the land: for his golden wings and tail
+showed their glittering under side as he spread them; his scarlet
+headdress glowed like fire; his rump was radiantly white, not to speak
+of the jetty black of his other ornaments and the beautiful
+ground-colors of his body. He danced before his lady, showing her all
+these beauties, and perhaps boasting a little of his own good looks,
+though she was no less beautiful. He spread his wings and tail for her
+inspection; he bowed, to show his red crescent; he bridled, he stepped
+forward and back and sidewise with deep bows to his mistress, coaxing
+her with the mellowest and most enticing _co-wee-tucks_, which no doubt
+in his language meant "Oh, promise me," laughing now and then his jovial
+_wick-a-wick-a-wick-a-wick-a_, either in glee or nervousness. It was all
+so very silly--and so very nice! I wonder how it all came out. Did she
+promise him? Or did she find a gayer suitor?
+
+
+
+
+IV
+
+HOW THE WOODPECKER MAKES A HOUSE
+
+
+All woodpeckers make their houses in the wood of trees, either the trunk
+or one of the branches. Almost the only exceptions to this rule are
+those that live in the treeless countries of the West. In the torrid
+deserts of Arizona and the Southwest, some species are obliged to build
+in the thorny branches of giant cacti, which there grow to an enormous
+size. In the treeless plains to the northward, a few individuals, for
+lack of anything so suitable as the cactus, dig holes in clay banks, or
+even lay their eggs upon the surface of the prairie. In a country where
+chimney swallows nest in deserted houses, and sand martins burrow in the
+sides of wells, who wonders at the flicker's thinking that the side of a
+haystack, the hollow of a wheel-hub, or the cavity under an old
+ploughshare, is an ideal home? But in wooded countries the woodpeckers
+habitually nest in trees. The only exceptions I know are a few flickers'
+holes in old posts, and a few instances where flickers have pecked
+through the weatherboarding of a house to nest in the space between the
+walls.
+
+But because a bird nests in a hole in a tree, it is not necessarily a
+woodpecker. The sparrow-hawk, the house sparrow, the tree swallow, the
+bluebird, most species of wrens, and several of the smaller species of
+owls nest either in natural cavities in trees or in deserted
+woodpeckers' holes. The chickadees, the crested titmice, and the
+nuthatches dig their own holes after the same pattern as the
+woodpecker's. However, the large, round holes were all made by
+woodpeckers, and of those under two inches in diameter, our friend Downy
+made his full share. It is easy to tell who made the hole, for the
+different birds have different styles of housekeeping. The chickadees
+and nuthatches always build a soft little nest of grass, leaves, and
+feathers, while the woodpeckers lay their eggs on a bed of chips, and
+carry nothing in from outside.
+
+Soon after they have mated in the spring, the woodpeckers begin to talk
+of housekeeping. First, a tree must be chosen. It may be sound or partly
+decayed, one of a clump or solitary; but it is usually dead or
+hollow-hearted, and at least partly surrounded by other trees. Sometimes
+a limb is chosen, sometimes an upright trunk, and the nest may be from
+two feet to one hundred feet from the ground, though most frequently it
+will be found not less than ten nor more than thirty feet up. However
+odd the location finally occupied, it is likely that it was not the
+first one selected. A woodpecker will dig half a dozen houses rather
+than occupy an undesirable tenement. It is very common to find their
+unfinished holes and the wider-mouthed, shallower pockets which they dig
+for winter quarters; for those that spend their winters in the cold
+North make a hole to live in nights and cold and stormy days.
+
+The first step in building is to strike out a circle in the bark as
+large as the doorway is to be; that is, from an inch and a half to three
+or four inches in diameter according to the size of the woodpecker. It
+is nearly always a perfect circle. Try, if you please, to draw freehand
+a circle of dots as accurate as that which the woodpecker strikes out
+hurriedly with his bill, and see whether it is easy to do as well as he
+does.
+
+If the size and shape of the doorway suit him, the woodpecker scales off
+the bark inside his circle of holes and begins his hard work. He seems
+to take off his coat and work in his shirtsleeves, so vigorously does he
+labor as he clings with his stout toes, braced in position by his
+pointed tail. The chips fly out past him, or if they lie in the hole,
+he sweeps them out with his bill and pelts again at the same place. The
+pair take turns at the work. Who knows how long they work before
+resting? Do they take turns of equal length? Does one work more than the
+other? A pair of flickers will dig about two inches in a day, the hole
+being nearly two and a half inches in diameter. A week or more is
+consumed in digging the nest, which, among the flickers, is commonly
+from ten to eighteen inches deep. The hole usually runs in horizontally
+for a few inches and then curves down, ending in a chamber large enough
+to make a comfortable nest for the mother and her babies.
+
+What a good time the little ones have in their hole! Rain and frost
+cannot chill them; no enemy but the red squirrel is likely to disturb
+them. There they lie in their warm, dark chamber, looking up at the ray
+of light that comes in the doorway, until at last they hear the
+scratching of their mother's feet as she alights on the outside of the
+tree and clambers up to feed them. What a piping and calling they raise
+inside the hole, and how they all scramble up the walls of their chamber
+and thrust out their beaks to be fed, till the old tree looks as if it
+were blossoming with little woodpeckers' hungry mouths!
+
+
+
+
+V
+
+HOW A FLICKER FEEDS HER YOUNG[1]
+
+
+[Footnote 1: Based upon the observations of Mr. William Brewster.]
+
+As the house of the woodpecker has no windows and the old bird very
+nearly fills the doorway when she comes home, it is hard to find out
+just how she feeds her little ones. But one of our best naturalists has
+had the opportunity to observe it, and has told what he saw.
+
+A flicker had built a nest in the trunk of a rather small dead tree
+which, after the eggs were hatched, was accidentally broken off just at
+the entrance hole. This left the whole cavity exposed to the weather;
+but it was too late to desert the nest, and impossible to remove the
+young birds to another nest.
+
+When first visited, the five little birds were blind, naked, and
+helpless. They were motherless, too. Some one must have killed their
+pretty mother; for she never came to feed them, and the father was
+taking all the care of his little family. When disturbed the little
+birds hissed like snakes, as is the habit of the callow young of
+woodpeckers, chickadees, and other birds nesting habitually in holes in
+trees. When they were older and their eyes were open, they made a
+clatter much like the noise of a mowing-machine, and loud enough to be
+heard thirty yards away.
+
+The father came at intervals of from twenty to sixty minutes to feed the
+little ones. He was very shy, and came so quietly that he would be first
+seen when he alighted close by with a low little laugh or a subdued but
+anxious call to the young. "Here I am again!" he laughed; or "Are you
+all right, children?" he called to them. "All right!" they would answer,
+clattering in concert like a two-horse mower.
+
+As soon as they heard him scratching on the tree-trunk, up they would
+all clamber to the edge of the nest and hold out their gaping mouths to
+be fed. Each one was anxious to be fed first, because there never was
+enough to go round. There was always one that, like the little pig of
+the nursery tale, "got none." When he came to the nest, the father would
+look around a moment, trying to choose the one he wanted to feed first.
+Did he always pick out the poor little one that had none the time
+before, I wonder?
+
+After the old bird had made his choice, he would bend over the little
+bird and drive his long bill down the youngster's throat as if to run
+it through him. Then the little bird would catch hold as tightly as he
+could and hang on while his father jerked him up and down for a second
+or a second and a half with great rapidity. What was he doing? He was
+pumping food from his own stomach into the little one's. Many birds feed
+their young in this way. They do not hold the food in their own mouths,
+but swallow and perhaps partially digest it, so that it shall be fit for
+the tender little stomachs.
+
+While the woodpecker was pumping in this manner his motions were much
+the same as when he drummed, but his tail twitched as rapidly as his
+head and his wings quivered. The motion seemed to shake his whole body.
+
+In two weeks from the time when the little birds were blind, naked,
+helpless nestlings they became fully feathered and full grown, able to
+climb up to the top of the nest, from which they looked out with
+curiosity and interest. At any noise they would slip silently back. A
+day or two later they left the old nest and began their journeys.
+
+No naturalist has been able to tell us whether other woodpeckers than
+the golden-winged flicker feed their young in this way; and little is
+known of the number of kinds of birds that use this method, but it is
+suspected that it is far more common than has ever been determined. If
+an old bird is seen to put her bill down a young one's throat and keep
+it there even so short a time as a second, it is probable that she is
+feeding the little one by regurgitation, that is, by pumping up food
+from her own stomach. Any bird seen doing this should be carefully
+watched. It has long been known that the domestic pigeon does this, and
+the same has been observed a number of times of the ruby-throated
+hummingbird. A California lady has taken some remarkable photographs of
+the Anna's hummingbird in the act, showing just how it is done.
+
+
+
+
+VI
+
+FRIEND DOWNY
+
+
+No better little bird comes to our orchards than our friend the downy
+woodpecker. He is the smallest and one of the most sociable of our
+woodpeckers,--a little, spotted, black-and-white fellow, precisely like
+his larger cousin the hairy, except in having the outer tail-feathers
+barred instead of plain. Nearly everything that can be said of one is
+equally true of the other on a smaller scale. They look alike, they act
+alike, and their nests and eggs are alike in everything but size.
+
+Downy is the most industrious of birds. He is seldom idle and never in
+mischief. As he does not fear men, but likes to live in orchards and in
+the neighborhood of fields, he is a good friend to us. On the farm he
+installs himself as Inspector of Apple-trees. It is an old and an
+honorable profession among birds. The pay is small, consisting only of
+what can be picked up, but, as cultivated trees are so infested with
+insects that food is always plentiful, and as they have usually a
+dead branch suitable to nest in, Downy asks no more. Summer and winter
+he works on our orchards. At sunrise he begins, and he patrols the
+branches till sunset. He taps on the trunks to see whether he can hear
+any rascally borers inside. He inspects every tree carefully in a
+thorough and systematic way, beginning low down and following up with a
+peek into every crevice and a tap upon every spot that looks suspicious.
+If he sees anything which ought not to be there, he removes it at once.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+A moth had laid her eggs in a crack in the bark, expecting to hatch out
+a fine brood of caterpillars: but Downy ate them all, thus saving a
+whole branch from being overrun with caterpillars and left fruitless,
+leafless, and dying. A beetle had just deposited her eggs here. Downy
+saw her, and took not only the eggs but the beetle herself. Those eggs
+would have hatched into boring larvæ, which would have girdled and
+killed some of the branches, or have burrowed under the bark, causing it
+to fall off, or have bored into the wood and, perhaps, have killed the
+tree. Nor is the full-grown borer exempt. Downy hears him, pecks a few
+strokes, and harpoons him with unerring aim. When Downy has made an
+arrest in this way, the prisoner does not escape from the police. Here
+is a colony of ants, running up the tree in one line and down in
+another, touching each other with their feelers as they pass. A feast
+for our friend! He takes both columns, and leaves none to tell the tale.
+This is a good deed, too, since ants are of no benefit to fruit-trees
+and are very fond of the dead-ripe fruit.
+
+And Downy is never too busy to listen for borers. They are fine plump
+morsels much to his taste, not so sour as ants, nor so hard-shelled as
+beetles, nor so insipid as insects' eggs. A good borer is his preferred
+dainty. The work he does in catching borers is of incalculable benefit,
+for no other bird can take his place. The warblers, the vireos, and some
+other birds in summer, the chickadees and nuthatches all the year round,
+are helping to eat up the eggs and insects that lie near the surface,
+but the only birds equipped for digging deep under the bark and dragging
+forth the refractory grubs are the woodpeckers.
+
+So Downy works at his self-appointed task in our orchards summer and
+winter, as regular as a policeman on his beat. But he is much more than
+a policeman, for he acts as judge, jury, jailer, and jail. All the
+evidence he asks against any insect is to find him loafing about the
+premises. "I swallow him first and find out afterwards whether he was
+guilty," says Downy with a wink and a nod.
+
+Most birds do not stay all the year, in the North, at least, and most,
+in return for their labors in the spring, demand some portion of the
+fruit or grain of midsummer and autumn. Not so Downy. His services are
+entirely gratuitous; he works twice as long as most others. He spends
+the year with us, no winter ever too severe for him, no summer too hot;
+and he never taxes the orchard, nor takes tribute from the berry patch.
+Only a quarter of his food is vegetable, the rest being made up of
+injurious insects; and the vegetable portion consists entirely of wild
+fruits and weed-seeds, nothing that man eats or uses. Downy feeds on the
+wild dogwood berries, a few pokeberries, the fruit of the woodbine, and
+the seeds of the poison-ivy,--whatever scanty and rather inferior fare
+is to be had at Nature's fall and winter table. If in the cold winter
+weather we will take pains to hang out a bone with some meat on it, raw
+or cooked, or a piece of suet, taking care that it is not salted,--for
+few wild birds except the crossbills can eat salted food,--we may see
+how he appreciates our thoughtfulness. Shall we grudge him a bone from
+our own abundance, or neglect to fasten it firmly out of reach of the
+cat and dog? If his cousin the hairy and his neighbor the chickadee
+come and eat with him, bid them a hearty welcome. The feast is spread
+for all the birds that help men, and friend Downy shall be their host.
+
+
+
+
+VII
+
+PERSONA NON GRATA
+
+
+We shall not attempt to deny that Downy has an unprincipled relative.
+While it is no discredit, it is a great misfortune to Downy, who is
+often murdered merely because he looks a little, a very little, like
+this disreputable cousin of his. The real offender is the sapsucker,
+that musical genius of whom we have already spoken.
+
+The popular belief is that every woodpecker is a sapsucker, and that
+every hole he digs in a tree is an injury to the tree. We have seen that
+every hole Downy digs is a benefit, and now we wish to learn why it is
+that the sapsucker's work is any more injurious than other woodpeckers'
+holes; how we are to recognize the sapsucker's work; and how much damage
+he does. We will do what the scientists often do,--examine the bird's
+work and make it tell us the story. There is no danger of hurting the
+sapsucker's reputation. The farmer could have no worse opinion of him;
+and, though the case has been appealed to the higher courts of science
+more than once, where the sapsucker's cause has been eloquently and
+ably defended, the verdict has gone against him. Scientists now do not
+deny that the sapsucker does harm. But his worst injury is less in the
+damage he does to the trees than in the ill-will and suspicion he
+creates against woodpeckers which do no harm at all. If you will study
+the picture and the descriptions in the Key to the Woodpeckers, you will
+be able to recognize the sapsucker and his nearest relatives, whether in
+the East or in the West. But all sapsuckers may be known by their pale
+yellowish under parts, and by the work they leave behind. As the
+yellow-bellied sapsucker is the only one found east of the Rocky
+Mountains, we shall speak only of him and his work.
+
+[Illustration: Work of Sapsucker.]
+
+Here is a specimen of the yellow-bellied sapsucker's work which I picked
+up under the tree from which it had fallen. We do not need to inquire
+whether the tree was injured by its falling, for we know that the loss
+of sound and healthy bark is always a damage. Was this sound bark? Yes,
+because it is still firm and new. The sap in it dried quickly,
+showing that neither disease nor worms caused it to fall; it is clean
+and hard on the back, showing that it came from a live tree, not from a
+dead, rotting log.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+How do I know that a bird caused it to fall? The marks are precisely
+such as are always left by a woodpecker's bill. How do I know that it
+was a sapsucker's work? Because no other woodpecker has the habit which
+characterizes the sapsucker, of sinking holes in straight lines. The
+sapsuckers drill lines of holes sometimes around and sometimes up and
+down the tree-trunk, but almost always in rings or belts about the trunk
+or branches. A girdle may be but a single line of holes, or it may
+consist of four or five, or more, lines. Sometimes a band will be two
+feet wide; and as many as eight hundred holes have been counted on the
+trunk of a single tree. Such extensive peckings, however, are to be
+expected only on large forest trees. Most fruit and ornamental trees are
+girdled a few times about the trunk, and about the principal branches
+just below the nodes, or forks.
+
+Why did the bird dig these holes? There are three things that he might
+have obtained,--sap, the inner bark, and boring larvæ. Some naturalists
+have suggested a fourth as possible,--the insects that would be
+attracted by the sap.
+
+We will see what the piece of bark tells us. It is four and a half
+inches long, by an inch and a half wide, and its area of six and three
+fourths square inches has forty-four punctures. Does this look as if the
+bird were digging grubs? Do borers live in such straight little streets?
+The number and arrangement of the holes show that he was not seeking
+borers, while the naturalists tell us that he never eats a borer unless
+by accident. What did he get? Undoubtedly he pecked away some of the
+inner bark. All these holes are much larger on the back side of the
+specimen than on the outer surface. While the damp inner bark would
+shrink a little on exposure to the air, we know that it could not shrink
+as much as this; and investigation has shown that the sapsucker feeds
+largely on just such food, for it has been found in his stomach. Two
+other possible food-substances remain,--sap and insects. We know that
+the sapsucker eats many insects, but it is impossible to prove that he
+intended these holes for insect lures. Sap he might have gotten from
+them, if he wished it. We know that the white birch is full of excellent
+sap, from which can be made a birch candy, somewhat bitter, but nearly
+as good as horehound candy. The rock and red maples and the white canoe
+birch are the only trees in our Northern forests from which we make
+candy. A strong probability that our bird wanted sap is indicated by the
+arrangement of the holes. Usually he drills his holes in rings around
+the tree-trunk, but in this instance his longest lines of holes are
+vertical. If our sapsucker was drilling for sap, he arranged his holes
+so that it would almost run into his mouth, lazy bird!
+
+Our piece of bark has taught us:--
+
+That the sapsucker injured this tree.
+
+That he was not after grubs.
+
+That he got, and undoubtedly ate, the soft inner bark of the tree.
+
+That he got, and may have drunk, the sap.
+
+We could not infer any more from a single instance, but the naturalists
+assure us that the bird is in the habit of injuring trees, that he never
+eats grubs intentionally, and that he eats too much bark for it to be
+regarded as taken accidentally with other food. About the sap they
+cannot be so sure, as it digests very quickly. There remain two points
+to prove: whether the sapsucker drills his holes for the sake of the
+sap, or for insects attracted by the sap, provided that he eats anything
+but the inner bark.
+
+Our little specimen can tell us no more, but two mountain ash trees
+which were intimate acquaintances of mine from childhood can go on with
+the story. Do not be surprised that I speak of them as friends; the
+naturalist who does not make _friends_ of the creatures and plants about
+will hear few stories from them. These trees would not tell this tale to
+any one but an intimate acquaintance. Let us hear what they have to say
+about the sapsucker.
+
+There are in the garden of my old home two mountain ash trees,
+thirty-six years of age, each having grown from a sprout that sprang up
+beside an older tree cut down in 1863. They stand not more than two rods
+apart; have the same soil, the same amount of sun and rain, the same
+exposure to wind, and equal care. During all the years of my childhood
+one was a perfectly healthy tree, full of fruit in its season, while the
+other bore only scanty crops, and was always troubled with cracked and
+scaling bark. To-day the unhealthy tree is more vigorous than ever
+before, while its formerly stalwart brother stands a mere wreck of its
+former life and beauty. What should be the cause of such a remarkable
+change when all conditions of growth have remained the same?
+
+I admit that there is some internal difference in the trees, for all the
+birds tell me of it. One has always borne larger and more abundant fruit
+than the other, but this is no reason why the birds should strip all
+the berries from that tree before eating any from the other. When we
+know that the favorite tree stands directly in front of the windows of a
+much-used room and overhangs a frequented garden path, the preference
+becomes more marked. But robins, grosbeaks, purple finches, and the
+whole berry-eating tribe agree to choose one and neglect the other, and
+even the spring migrants will leave the gay red tassels of fruit still
+swinging on one tree, to scratch over the leaves and eat the fallen
+berries that lie beneath the other. My own taste is not keen in choosing
+between bitter berries, but the birds all agree that there is a decided
+difference in these trees,--did agree, I should say, for their favorite
+is the tree that is dying. Evidently this is a question of taste. It is
+interesting to observe that the sapsucker, which was never seen to touch
+the fruit of the trees, agrees with the fruit-eating birds. Nearly all
+his punctures were in the tree now dying. Is there a difference in the
+taste of the sap? Does the taste of the sap affect the taste of the
+fruit? Or is it merely a question of quantity? If he comes for sap, he
+prefers one tree to the other on the score either of better quality or
+greater quantity.
+
+We will discuss later whether it is sap that he wishes: all that now
+concerns us is to note that the internal difference, whatever it is, is
+in favor of the tree that is dying; while the only external difference
+appears to be the marks left by the sapsucker. While one tree is
+sparingly marked by him, the other is tattooed with his punctures,
+placed in single rings and in belts around trunk and branches beneath
+every fork. It is a law of reasoning that, when every condition but one
+is the same and the effects are different, the one exceptional condition
+is the _cause_ of the difference. If these trees are alike in everything
+except the work of the sapsucker (the only internal difference
+apparently _offsetting_ his work in part), what inference do we draw as
+to the effect of his work?
+
+We presume that he is killing the tree, without as yet knowing how he
+does it. What is his object? Good observers have stated that he draws a
+little sap in order to attract flies and wasps; that the sap is not
+drawn for its own sake, but as a bait for insects. Is this theory true?
+
+The first objection is that it is improbable. The sapsucker is a
+retiring, woodland bird that would hesitate to come into a town garden a
+mile away from the nearest woods unless to get something he could not
+find in the woods. Had he wanted insects, he would have tapped a tree
+in the woods, or else he would have caught them in his usual flycatching
+fashion. There must have been something about the mountain ash tree that
+he craved. As it is a very rare tree in the vicinity of my home, the
+sapsucker's only chance to satisfy his longing was by coming to some
+town garden like our own.
+
+Not only is the theory improbable, but it fails to explain the
+sapsucker's actions in this instance. In twenty years he was never seen
+to catch an insect that was attracted by the sap he drew. This does not
+deny that he may have caught insects now and then, but it does deny that
+he set the sap running for a lure. As he was never far away, and was
+sometimes only four and a half feet by measure from a chamber window,
+all that he did could be seen. He did not catch insects at his holes. He
+drank sap and ate bark.
+
+Finally, the theory is not only improbable and inadequate, but in this
+instance it is impossible. I do not remember seeing a sapsucker in the
+tree in the spring; if he came in the summer, it must have been at rare
+intervals; but he was always there in the fall, when the leaves were
+dropping. At that season the insect hordes had been dispersed by the
+autumnal frosts, so that we know he did not come for insects.
+
+In the many years during which I watched the sapsuckers--for there were
+undoubtedly a number of different birds that came, although never more
+than one at a time--there was such a curious similarity in their actions
+that it is entirely proper to speak as if the same bird returned year
+after year. His visits, as I have said, were usually made at the same
+season. He would come silently and early, with the evident intention of
+making this an all-day excursion. By eight o'clock he would be seen
+clinging to a branch and curiously observant of the dining-room window,
+which at that hour probably excited both his interest and his alarm.
+Early in the day he showed considerable activity, flitting from limb to
+limb and sinking a few holes, three or four in a row, usually _above_
+the previous upper girdle of the limbs he selected to work upon. After
+he had tapped several limbs he would sit waiting patiently for the sap
+to flow, lapping it up quickly when the drop was large enough. At first
+he would be nervous, taking alarm at noises and wheeling away on his
+broad wings till his fright was over, when he would steal quietly back
+to his sap-holes. When not alarmed, his only movement was from one row
+of holes to another, and he tended them with considerable regularity. As
+the day wore on he became less excitable, and clung cloddishly to his
+tree-trunk with ever increasing torpidity, until finally he hung
+motionless as if intoxicated, tippling in sap, a disheveled, smutty,
+silent bird, stupefied with drink, with none of that brilliancy of
+plumage and light-hearted gayety which made him the noisiest and most
+conspicuous bird of our April woods.
+
+Our mountain ash trees have told us several facts about the sapsucker:--
+
+That he did not come to eat insects.
+
+That he did come to drink sap, and that he probably ate the inner bark
+also.
+
+That he drank the sap because he liked it, not for some secondary
+object, as insects.
+
+That he could detect difference in the quality or quantity of the sap,
+which caused him to prefer a particular tree.
+
+That this difference apparently was in the taste of the sap, and that
+the effects of a day's drinking of mountain ash sap seemed to indicate
+some intoxicant or narcotic quality in the sap of that particular tree.
+
+That the effect of his work upon the tree was apparently injurious, as
+it is the only cause assigned of a healthy tree's dying before a less
+healthy one of the same age and species, subject all its life to the
+same conditions.
+
+So much we have learned about this sapsucker's habits, and now we should
+like to know why his work is harmful, and why that of the other
+woodpeckers is not. It is not because he drinks the sap. All the sap he
+could eat or waste would not harm the tree, if allowed to run out of a
+few holes. Think how many gallons the sugar-makers drain out of a single
+tree without killing the tree. But the sugar-maker takes the sap in the
+spring, when the crude sap is mounting up in the tree, while the
+sapsucker does not begin his work till midsummer or autumn, when the
+tree is sending down its elaborated sap to feed the trunk and make it
+grow. This accounts for the woodpecker's digging his pits _above_ the
+lines of the holes already in the tree. The loss of this elaborated sap
+is a greater injury than the waste of a far larger quantity of crude
+sap, so that on the season of the year when the sapsucker digs his holes
+depends in large measure the amount of damage he does. The injury that
+he does to the wood itself is trivial. He is not a wood_pecker_ except
+at time of nesting, and most woodpeckers prefer to build in a dead or
+dying branch, where their work does no hurt. But we know very well that
+a tree may be a wreck, riven from top to bottom by lightning, split open
+to the heart by the tempest, entirely hollow the whole length of its
+trunk, and yet may flourish and bear fruit. The tree lives in its outer
+layers. It may be crippled in almost any way, if the bark is left
+uninjured; but if an inch of bark is cut out entirely around the tree,
+it will die, for the sap can no longer run up and down to nourish it.
+
+This is the sapsucker's crime: he girdles the tree,--not at his first
+coming, nor yet at his second, not with one row of holes, nor yet with
+two; but finally, after years perhaps, when row after row of punctures,
+each checking a little the flow of sap, have overlapped and offset each
+other and narrowed the channels through which it could mount and
+descend, until the flow is stopped. Then the tree dies. It is not the
+holes he makes, nor the sap he draws, but the way he places his holes
+that makes the sapsucker an unwelcome visitor. For an unacceptable
+individual he is to the farmer,--_persona non grata_, as kings say of
+ambassadors who do not please their majesties. What shall we do with
+him, the only black sheep in all the woodpecker flock? Let him alone,
+unless we are positively sure that we know him from every other kind of
+woodpecker. The damage he does is trifling compared with what we should
+do if we made war upon other woodpeckers for some supposed wrong-doing
+of the sapsucker.
+
+
+
+
+VIII
+
+EL CARPINTERO
+
+
+In California and along the southwestern boundary of the United States
+lives a woodpecker known among the Mexicans as El Carpintero, the
+Carpenter.
+
+Carpentering is both his profession and his pastime, and he seems really
+to enjoy the work. When there is nothing more pressing to be done, he
+spends his time tinkering around, fitting acorns into holes in such
+great numbers and in so workmanlike a fashion that we do not know which
+is more remarkable, his patience or his skill. Every acorn is fitted
+into a separate hole made purposely for it, every one is placed butt end
+out and is driven in flush with the surface, so that a much frequented
+tree often appears as if studded with ornamental nails. "What an
+industrious bird!" we exclaim; but still it takes some time to
+appreciate how enormous is the labor of the Carpenter. Whole trees will
+sometimes be covered with his work, until a single tree has thousands of
+acorns bedded into its bark so neatly and tightly that no other
+creature can remove them.
+
+[Illustration: Work of Californian Woodpecker.]
+
+We may take for examination, from specimens of the Carpenter's work, a
+piece of spruce bark seven inches long by six wide, containing ten
+acorns and two empty holes. As spruce bark is so much harder and rougher
+than the pine bark in which he usually stores his nuts,[1] this
+specimen looks rough and unfinished, and even shows some acorns driven
+in sidewise; but for another reason I have preferred it to
+better-looking examples of his work for study. As we shall see later, it
+gives us a definite bit of information about the bird.
+
+[Footnote 1: They often use white-oak bark, fence-posts, telegraph
+poles, even the stalks of century-plants, when trees are not convenient.
+(Merriam, _Auk_, viii. 117.)]
+
+Think of the work of digging these twelve holes. Think of the labor of
+carrying these ten large acorns and driving them in so tightly that
+after years of shrinking they cannot be removed by a knife without
+injuring either the acorn or the bark. Yet how small a part of the
+woodpecker's year's work is here! How long could he live on ten acorns?
+How many must he gather for his winter's needs? How many must he lose by
+forgetting to come back to them? We cannot calculate the work a single
+bird does nor the nuts he eats, for several birds usually work in
+company and may use the same tree; but all the woodpeckers are large
+eaters, and the Californian has been singled out for special mention.
+
+Can we estimate the amount of work required to lay up one day's food?
+Judging by the amount of nuts some other birds will eat, I should
+think that all ten acorns contained in this piece of bark could be eaten
+in one day without surfeit. The estimate seems to me well inside of his
+probable appetite. I have experimented on this piece of bark, using a
+woodpecker's bill for a tool, and it takes me twenty minutes to dig a
+hole as large but not as neat as these. Doubtless it would not take the
+woodpecker as long; but at my rate of working, four hours were spent in
+digging these twelve holes. Then each acorn had to be hunted up and
+brought to the hole prepared for it. This entailed a journey, it may
+have been only from one tree to another, or it may have been, and very
+likely was, a considerable flight. For these acorns grew on oak-trees,
+and we find them driven into the bark of pines and spruces.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+This it is which gives our specimen its particular interest. While oaks
+and pines may be intermingled, though they naturally prefer different
+soils and situations, and in the Rocky Mountains the pine-belt lies
+above the oak region, spruce and oak trees do not grow in the same soil.
+The spruce-belt stands higher up than the pine. As these nuts are stored
+in the bark of a spruce-tree, we have clear evidence that the bird must
+have carried them some distance. For every nut he made the whole
+journey back and forth, since he could carry but one at a time,--ten
+long trips back and forth, certainly consuming several minutes each.
+
+Then each acorn had to be fitted to its hole. We have already spoken of
+the accuracy with which this is done, so that the Carpenter's work is a
+standing taunt to the hungry jays and squirrels which would gladly eat
+his nuts if they could get them. A careful observer tells us that when
+the hole is too small, the woodpecker takes the acorn out and makes the
+hole a little larger, working so cautiously, however, that he sometimes
+makes several trials before the acorn can be fitted and driven in flush
+with the bark. Some of these acorns show cracks down the sides, as if
+they had been split either in forcibly pulling them out of a hole not
+deep enough for them, or in driving them when green and soft into a hole
+too small for them. Of course after each trial the acorn must be hunted
+up where it lies on the ground and driven in again, and this takes
+considerable time.
+
+As nearly as we can estimate it, not less than half a day must have been
+spent in putting these acorns where we find them. With smaller acorns,
+stored in pine bark, less time would have been required; but weeks, if
+not months, of work are spent in laying up the winter's stores.
+
+How the woodpecker's back and jaws must have ached! Surely he is human
+enough to get tired with his work, and it is not play to do what this
+bird has done. Some of the acorns measure seven tenths of an inch in
+diameter by nine tenths in length, and the bird that carried them is
+smaller than a robin. How he must have hurried to reach his tree when
+the acorn was extra large! Yet he took time to drive every one in point
+foremost. Even those that lie upon their sides must have been forced
+into position by tapping the butt. He knows very well which end of an
+acorn is which, does our Carpenter.
+
+But what is the use of all this work? Why, if he wants acorns, does he
+not eat them as they lie scattered under the oaks, instead of taking
+pains to carry them away and put them into holes for the fun of eating
+them out of the holes afterward? The absurdity of this has led some
+people to surmise that the Carpenter chooses none but weevilly acorns,
+and stores them that the grub inside may grow large and fat and
+delicious. This would be very interesting, if it were true. There must
+of course be more weevilly acorns on the ground than he picks up, so
+that he could get as many grubs without taking all this trouble, and
+there is no reason why they should not be as large and good as those
+hatched out in holes in trees. When I wish to keep nuts sweet, I spread
+them out on the attic floor in the sun and air, keeping them where they
+will not touch each other. The Carpenter does practically the same
+thing. Is it probable that he tries to raise a fine crop of grubs in
+this way? If so, one or the other of us is doing just the wrong thing.
+But if weevils are what the Carpenter wants, then the nuts in the bark
+should be wormy; yet only two of them show any sign of a weevil, and of
+these one appears from its dull color and weather-beaten look to be a
+nut deposited several years before the others by some other woodpecker.
+Every other acorn is as hard, shining, and bright colored as when it
+fell from the tree. Evidently the bird picked these nuts up while they
+were fresh and good; perhaps he chose them _because_ they were good and
+fresh. The possibility becomes almost a certainty when we observe that
+naturalists agree that the Carpenter uses no acorns but the
+sweet-tasting species. Now there are likely to be as many grubs in one
+kind of an acorn as in another, and he would scarcely refuse any kind
+that contained them, if grubs were what he wanted. The fact that he
+takes sweet acorns, and those only, shows that it is the meat of the nut
+that he wants. And all good naturalists agree that it is the kernel
+itself that he eats.
+
+Why he stores them is not hard to decide when we remember that the
+Californian woodpecker, over a large part of his range, is a mountain
+bird. Though we think of California as the land of sunshine, it is not
+universal summer there. The mountain ranges have a winter as severe as
+that of New England, with a heavy snowfall. When the snow lies several
+feet deep among the pines and spruces of the uplands, the Carpenter is
+not distressed for food: his pantry is always above the level of the
+snow; he need neither scratch a meagre living from the edges of the
+snow-banks, nor go fasting. His fall's work has provided him not only
+with the necessities, but with the luxuries of life.
+
+But why does he spend so much time in making holes? He might tuck his
+nuts into some natural crevice in the oak bark, or drop them into
+cavities which all birds know so well where to find. And leave them
+where any pilfering jay would be able to pick them out at his ease? Or
+put them in the track of every wandering squirrel? Jays and squirrels
+are never too honest to refuse to steal, but they find it harder to get
+the woodpecker's stores out of his pine-tree pantry than to pick up
+honest acorns of their own. So, like the woodpecker, they lay up their
+own stores of nuts, and feed on them in winter, or go hungry.
+
+We have had very little aid from anything except the piece of bark we
+were studying, yet we have learned that the Californian woodpecker is a
+good carpenter; that he works hard at his trade; that he shows
+remarkable foresight in collecting his food, much ingenuity in housing
+it, good judgment in putting it where his enemies cannot get it, and
+wisdom in the plan he has adopted to give him a good supply of fresh
+nuts at a season when the autumn's crop is buried under the deep snow.
+
+If I were a Californian boy, I think I should spend my time in trying to
+find out more about this wise woodpecker, concerning which much remains
+to be discovered.
+
+
+
+
+IX
+
+A RED-HEADED COUSIN
+
+
+Besides his half-brothers, the narrow-fronted and ant-eating
+woodpeckers, the Carpenter has a numerous family of cousins,--the
+red-headed, the red-bellied, the golden-fronted, the Gila,[1] and the
+Lewis's woodpeckers. These all belong to one genus, and are much alike
+in structure, though totally different in color. Most of them are
+Western or Southwestern birds, but one is found in nearly all parts of
+the United States lying between the Hudson River and the Rocky
+Mountains, and is the most abundant woodpecker of the middle West. This
+well-known cousin is the red-headed woodpecker, the tricolored beauty
+that sits on fence-posts and telegraph poles, and sallies out, a blaze
+of white, steel-blue, and scarlet, a gorgeous spectacle, whenever an
+insect flits by. He is the one that raps so merrily on your tin roofs
+when he feels musical.
+
+[Footnote 1: So named from being found along the Gila River.]
+
+In many ways the red-head, as he is familiarly called, is like his
+carpenter cousin. Both indulge in long-continued drumming; both catch
+flies expertly on the wing; and both have the curious habit of laying up
+stores of food for future use. The Californian woodpecker not only
+stores acorns, but insect food as well. But though the Carpenter's
+habits have long been known, it is a comparatively short time since the
+red-head was first detected laying up winter supplies.
+
+The first to report this habit of the red-head was a gentleman in South
+Dakota, who one spring noticed that they were eating _young_
+grasshoppers. At that season he supposed that all the insects of the
+year previous would be dead or torpid, and certainly full-grown, while
+those of the coming summer would be still in the egg. Where could the
+bird find half-grown grasshoppers? Being interested to explain this, he
+watched the red-heads until he saw that one went frequently to a post,
+and appeared to get something out of a crevice in its side. In that post
+he found nearly a hundred grasshoppers, still alive, but wedged in so
+tightly they could not escape. He also found other hiding-places all
+full of grasshoppers, and discovered that the woodpeckers lived upon
+these stores nearly all winter.
+
+But it is not grasshoppers only that the red-head hoards, though he
+is very fond of them. In some parts of the country it is easier to find
+nuts than to find grasshoppers, and they are much less perishable food.
+The red-head is very fond of both acorns and beechnuts. Probably he eats
+chestnuts also. Who knows how many kinds of nuts the red-head eats? You
+might easily determine not only what he will eat, but what he prefers,
+if a red-headed woodpecker lives near you. Lay out different kinds of
+nuts on different days, putting them on a shed roof, or in some place
+where squirrels and blue jays would not be likely to dare to steal them,
+and see whether he takes all the kinds you offer. Then lay out mixed
+nuts and notice which ones he carries off first. If he takes all of one
+kind before he takes any of the others, we may be sure that he has
+discovered his favorite nut. Such little experiments furnish just the
+information which scientific men are glad to get.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+It is well known that the red-head is very fond of beechnuts. Every
+other year we expect a full crop of nuts, and close observation shows
+that the red-heads come to the North in much larger numbers and stay
+much later on these years of plenty than on the years of scanty crops.
+Lately it has been discovered that they not only eat beechnuts all the
+fall, but store them up for winter use. This time the observation was
+made in Indiana. There, when the nuts were abundant, the red-heads were
+seen busily carrying them off. Their accumulations were found in all
+sorts of places: cavities in old tree-trunks contained nuts by the
+handful; knot-holes, cracks, crevices, seams in the barns were filled
+full of nuts. Nuts were tucked into the cracks in fence-posts; they were
+driven into railroad ties; they were pounded in between the shingles on
+the roofs; if a board was sprung out, the space behind it was filled
+with nuts, and bark or wood was often brought to cover over the gathered
+store. No doubt children often found these hiding-places and ate the
+nuts, thinking they were robbing some squirrel's hoard.
+
+In the South, where the beech-tree is replaced by the oak, the red-heads
+eat acorns. I should like to know whether they store acorns as they do
+beechnuts. Are chestnuts ever laid up for winter? How far south is the
+habit kept up? Is it observed beyond the limits of a regular and
+considerable snowfall? That is, do the birds lay up their nuts in order
+to keep them out of the snow, or for some other reason?
+
+It remains to be discovered if other woodpeckers have hoarding-places.
+We know that the sapsucker eats beechnuts, and the downy and the hairy
+woodpeckers also; that the red-bellied woodpecker and the golden-winged
+flicker eat acorns; and I have seen the downy woodpecker eating
+chestnuts, or the grubs in them, hanging head downward at the very tip
+of the branches like a chickadee. It may be possible that some of these
+lay up winter stores.
+
+[Illustration: Head of the Lewis's Woodpecker.]
+
+It is known that the Lewis's woodpecker occasionally shows signs of a
+hoarding instinct. It was recently noted that in the San Bernardino
+Mountains of California the Lewis's woodpecker, after driving away the
+smaller Californian woodpeckers, tried to put acorns into the holes the
+Carpenter had made, but, being unused to the work, did it very clumsily.
+Soon after this observation was published, a boy friend living near
+Denver told me that a short time before he had seen a woodpecker that
+had a large quantity of acorns shelled and broken into quarters, on
+which he was feeding. This woodpecker was identified beyond a doubt as
+the Lewis's woodpecker. So we begin to suspect that the habit of storing
+up food is not an uncommon one among the woodpeckers.
+
+
+
+
+X
+
+A STUDY OF ACQUIRED HABITS
+
+
+Something interesting yet remains to be discovered of the hoarding habit
+of the red-head. How strange that so familiar a bird should have a habit
+so easily detected, and yet that no one in all these years should speak
+of it! Who does not know how mice and chipmunks hide their food? Who has
+not watched the blue jay skulking off to hide an acorn where he will be
+sure to forget it? Who does not remember the articles his pet Jim Crow
+stole and lost to him forever? The hoarding habit has long been observed
+of many dull-colored, rare, or insignificant creatures. That one so
+noisy, gay-colored, tame, and abundant as our red-headed woodpecker
+should have the same habit and escape observation is certainly
+remarkable. But though it is over twenty years since the storing of
+grasshoppers was recorded and twelve since the practice of laying up
+beechnuts was observed, very little seems to have been learned of the
+habit since these records were made.
+
+There are two points to be considered: the habit long remained unknown;
+after it was discovered, it was long in being reaffirmed. It seems that,
+if it were a general habit, more would be known about it. Now if it is
+not a universal habit, it must be one of two alternatives, either a
+custom falling into disuse, or a new one just being acquired. That a
+habit so remarkable and so advantageous should be discarded after being
+universal is scarcely possible; that a habit so noticeable, if it were
+general, should remain unknown is improbable; that a habit which made
+life in winter both secure and easy should, if introduced by a few
+enterprising birds, become a universal custom, is not without a
+parallel. The probabilities point to the custom of hoarding food as a
+recently _acquired habit_.
+
+Acquired habits are not rare among birds. The chimney swift has learned
+to nest in chimneys since the Pilgrims landed; for there were no
+chimneys before that time. There is the evidence of old writers to show
+that they acquired the habit within fifty years of the time of the first
+permanent settlements in New England. The eaves swallow learned to
+transfer its nest from the side of a cliff to the side of a barn in less
+time. Most birds will change their food as soon as a new dainty is
+procurable, and they will even invent methods of getting it, if it is
+much to their taste. The way the English sparrows have learned to tear
+open corn husks so as to eat the corn in the milk is a good example, for
+our maize does not grow in England, and they have had to learn about its
+good qualities in the few years since they have become established
+outside of the cities. Yet it is already a well-established habit. So
+quickly does a habit spread from one bird to another, until it becomes
+the rule instead of the exception! Acquired habits always show
+adaptability, and often much forethought and reason. It is the shrewd
+bird that learns new tricks.
+
+Now there is not known among birds any evidence of greater forethought
+and reason than working hard in pleasant weather, when food is plentiful
+beyond all hope of ever exhausting it, to lay up provision for winter.
+How does the woodpecker know that winter will come this year? That there
+was a winter last year and the year before does not make it certain, but
+only probable, that there will be one this year. We cannot know
+ourselves that the seasons will change until we learn enough of
+astronomy to understand the proof. Nor does instinct explain the habit,
+as some would declare: since not all red-heads have the habit, though
+all must have instinct. It would seem as if memory and reason had
+devised this plan for outwitting winter, the bird's old enemy.
+
+The red-head is not a grub-eating woodpecker. Though beetles make up a
+third of his food, their larvæ do not form any part of it. Half his food
+for the entire year is vegetable, and the animal portion is composed
+principally of beetles, ants, caterpillars, and grasshoppers, which in
+winter time are hidden in snug places, or are dead under the snow. There
+are few berries in winter. The few seedy, weedy plants that stick up
+above the snow give to the birds the little they have; but the
+red-head's vegetable fare is limited at that season and his animal food
+almost lacking. Winter in the North is all very well for the hairy and
+downy cousins that like to hammer frozen tree-trunks for frozen grubs;
+but our red-headed friend does not eat grubs by preference. Rather than
+change his habits he will change his boarding-place. So he is a
+migratory woodpecker, though the woodpeckers are naturally home-loving
+birds, and do not migrate from preference. If, however, he can lay up a
+store of vegetable or animal food, he can winter in any climate.
+Hoarding is thus an invention as important to the woodpecker world as
+electric cars and telephones are to men. The probabilities are that
+this is a recent improvement in the red-head's ways of living.
+
+Another set of facts increases the probabilities of our supposition. It
+is a very delicate subject to handle because it affects the reputation
+of a family in good standing; but there is positive proof that sometimes
+the red-head has been guilty of crimes which would give a man a full
+column in the newspapers with staring headlines. If such deeds were not
+a thousand times less common among woodpeckers than they are among men
+the red-head would be declared an outlaw. He has been proved to be a
+hen-roost robber, a murderer, and a cannibal. In Florida he has sucked
+hen's eggs. In Iowa he has been seen to kill a duckling. There is a
+record in Ohio that he pecked holes in the walls of the eaves swallow's
+nest and stole all the eggs, and that he was finally killed in the act
+of robbing a setting hen's nest. Within the space of fifteen years, from
+Montana, Georgia, Colorado, New York, and Ontario, in addition to the
+records mentioned already from Florida, Ohio, and Iowa, come accounts of
+his stealing birds' eggs and murdering and eating other birds. The
+evidence is indisputable.
+
+It is charity to suppose that this is the work of natural criminals, or
+of degenerate, under-witted, or demented woodpeckers. Why should there
+not be such individuals among birds? One point is certain: so notable a
+habit could not long escape detection, since it is a barnyard crime. He
+who robs hen's nests gets caught--if he is a bird. Either these
+occurrences are very rare, not seen because of their extreme rarity, or
+they indicate a new custom just coming in. And the same is true of the
+habit of hoarding food; it is rare, or it is new.
+
+The frequency of such occurrences can be determined only by observation;
+but the time of their origin might be approximated in another way. If we
+could fix the date when the bird could not have done what he is now
+doing for simple lack of opportunity, we might say that the habit has
+been acquired since a certain date--as we have said of the English
+sparrow eating maize, of the chimney swift nesting in chimneys, and the
+cliff swallow building under the eaves. But we have no such help on the
+case of the red-head, which never has been without opportunities to get
+birds' eggs and to kill other birds.
+
+But there is a parallel case in another species where the date of an
+acquired habit can be proved. In Florida the red-bellied woodpecker has
+earned the names Orange Borer and Orange Sapsucker because he eats
+oranges. It is true that he is not charged with doing damage, because
+he attacks only the over-ripe and unmarketable fruit; it is known that
+the habit is not general yet, for even where the birds are abundant only
+a single bird or a pair will be found eating oranges, and always the
+same pair, proving that it is a habit not yet learned by all of the
+species; close observers declare, too, that it is but a few years since
+the bird took up the habit; and, finally, we know that this must be the
+case, for, though the wild orange was introduced by the Spaniards, the
+sweet fruit was not extensively cultivated until recently. Here is a
+habit which undoubtedly has been acquired within twenty years or so,
+which will in all probability increase until instead of being the
+exception it is the rule.
+
+Why may not the red-head's occasional cannibalism, unless this is mere
+individual degeneracy, and his more common custom of hoarding be habits
+that he is acquiring? Why, indeed, may not the Californian woodpecker's
+distinguishing trait be a habit which began like these among a few birds
+here and there, wiser or more progressive than the rest, and which in
+time became general and established? Why may not the two observed
+instances of the Lewis's woodpecker be examples of a similar habit just
+beginning? The very differences in their methods point to that
+explanation. The Lewis's woodpecker that had seen the Carpenter's work
+tried to imitate him; the one that lived outside his range adopted a way
+of his own, unnoticed before among woodpeckers, and shelled and
+quartered his nuts before he stored them.
+
+It is remarkable that these four woodpeckers are cousins; they belong to
+the same genus, and they have essentially the same structure, tastes,
+and habits. Why should it be strange if their minds were alike too? if
+they had a natural bent toward accumulativeness, and a natural desire to
+try new wrinkles? We are sure that one of them has acquired a new habit
+within a few years. Why may we not suppose as a basis and a spur to
+further investigation that the others also are acquiring ways new and
+strange?
+
+
+
+
+XI
+
+THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS BILL
+
+
+There is an old saying, "You may know a carpenter by his chips;" but,
+though chips are seldom long absent when a woodpecker is about, can we
+call the woodpecker a carpenter? Is he not both in his works and ways of
+working--with the one exception of the Californian woodpecker--more of a
+miner?
+
+For the carpenter takes pieces of wood, bit by bit, and joins them
+together till at last he has built a lofty skeleton or framework for his
+dwelling, which last of all he covers over and closes in; and the tools
+he uses are saw and hammer. With these alone he could build his house,
+though it might be neither very large nor very good. When a carpenter's
+house is finished, it is neither a cave nor a hole, but a pavilion built
+in the open air after the model of a spreading tree,--which frames a
+roof with its branches and shingles it with overlapping leaves. There is
+nothing in the woodpecker's way of building which corresponds to that.
+
+Quite different are the miner's methods. In the West, where the barren
+mountain sides stretch up into snowclad summits, on the face of slopes
+as seamed and gray and verdureless as the wrinkled trunk of an aged oak,
+I have seen holes where human woodpeckers burrow. The entrance to a mine
+half-way up a hillside looks strikingly like a woodpecker's hole and
+scarcely larger. Nor does the likeness vanish as we think how in their
+long tunnels inside their mountains of gold and iron and silver the
+delving miners are picking and prying and picking to lengthen their
+burrows just as the woodpeckers peck and pry and peck inside their
+wooden mountain, the tree-trunk. Which shall we call the woodpecker--a
+carpenter or a miner?
+
+What are the miner's tools? Pick and drill, are they not? What are the
+woodpecker's? The same. Certainly we shall see, if we stop to think,
+that it is not a chisel that he uses, as we sometimes say. A chisel is a
+knife driven by blows of a hammer; like a knife its effectiveness
+depends upon the sharpness and length of its cutting edge. But a
+woodpecker's bill is not a cutting tool. It is a wedge, but a wedge
+working on a different principle from a knife-edge. Look at this one and
+observe that, though strong and stout, it is not sharp and has no true
+cutting edge. It is a tapering, square-ended, flat-sided tool, rather
+six-sided at the base and holding its bevel and angles to the tip. The
+woodpecker's bill is a pick, not a chisel. It is used like a pick, being
+driven home with a heavy blow and getting its efficiency from its own
+weight and wedge-shape and from the force with which it is impelled.
+Watch the downy woodpecker at his work and see what sturdy blows he
+delivers, pausing after each one to aim and drive home another telling
+stroke. This is pick-axe work. But sometimes he rattles off a succession
+of taps so short and quick that they blend together in one continuous
+drumming, too light and quick to be likened to the ponderous swing of
+the pick-axe. Now he is drilling. The work of a drill is to cut out a
+small deep hole either by twirling (as in drilling metals) or by tapping
+(as in drilling stone). The woodpecker drills by the latter method and
+there is a curious likeness between his bill and the mason's tools.
+
+[Illustration: Head of Ivory-billed Woodpecker.]
+
+Any one who has lived in a granite country knows the deep round holes
+that stone masons make when they split rock. Did you ever wonder why
+they are as large at the bottom as at the top? If you remember the shape
+of a mason's drill, you will recollect that it looks a little like a
+stick of home-made molasses candy bitten off when it was just soft
+enough to stretch a little. The mason's drill is a round iron rod with a
+thin, flat end, sharpened on the edge and a little pointed in the
+centre. In the flattening of the sides and the width across the tip its
+end resembles that of a typical woodpecker's bill. The woodpeckers that
+drill for grubs, especially the largest, the logcock and the
+ivory-billed woodpecker, have the tip remarkably flattened. The likeness
+to the drill does not go farther because the woodpecker's bill is a
+combination tool; but it is drill-pointed rather than pick-pointed.
+
+What is the advantage of this compressed tip? Can the bird pick as well
+as he could with a sharp point? The bird and the mason reap the same
+benefit from this form of tool. A sharp-pointed drill would bind in the
+hole and could neither be driven ahead nor removed without difficulty,
+but the sharp-edged tool cuts a hole as wide as the instrument. There
+is, of course, some difference between working in stone and in wood, but
+the principle is the same. The mason strikes his drill with his hammer
+and cuts a crease in the stone; then lifts and turns the drill, cutting
+a crease in another direction; and so by continually changing the
+direction of the cuts until they radiate from a centre like the spokes
+of a wheel, he finally reduces a little circle of stone to a powder fine
+enough to be blown out of the hole. In drilling for a grub the
+woodpecker must do much the same thing. He wishes to keep his hole small
+at the top so as to save work, yet it must be large enough at the bottom
+to admit the borer when nipped between his mandibles; therefore he needs
+an instrument that, like a drill or a chisel, will cut a straight-sided
+hole. Indeed, we might call it a chisel just as well if it were not a
+double-wedge instead of a single wedge and if it did not move when it is
+struck instead of being held stationary beneath the blows.
+
+When he is digging his house the woodpecker uses his bill as a pick-axe.
+When he is digging for grubs he uses it as a drill. Now some species
+drill very little and some a great deal, according to the number of
+grubs they feed on; but all dig holes to nest in,--that is, all use
+their bills as picks but only a few employ them as drills. The flickers,
+for example, seldom drill for grubs, their food being picked up on the
+surface or dug from the earth; yet they excavate the deepest, roomiest
+holes made by any woodpeckers of their size; they use their bills
+effectively as pick-axes, but seldom, very seldom, as drills. And what
+do we find? No drill-point--not a truncate, compressed bill fit for
+drilling, but a sharper, pointed, rounded, _curving_ bill. Notice the
+ordinary pick-axe and see how much nearer the flicker's bill than the
+logcock's or the ivory-billed woodpecker's it is. Why is a flicker's
+bill better for being curved also? Why do the drilling woodpeckers have
+a perfectly straight bill? We should find by studying the birds and
+their food that there is a direct relation between the shape of the bill
+and the amount of drilling a woodpecker does; that the grub-eating or
+drilling woodpeckers have a straight bill, for working in small deep
+holes, while the flickers have a curved bill for prying out chips. And
+we should note that the flicker's bill is most like the ordinary bill of
+perching birds, while the drilling bill, as typified by the logcock's
+and the hairy woodpecker's bills, is a more specialized tool, limited to
+fewer uses, but more effective within its limits.
+
+There is another detail of the woodpecker's bills which casts light upon
+their habits. The species that drill most have their nostrils closely
+covered by little tufts of stiff feathers, scarcely more than bristles,
+which turn forward over the nostril. The density and the length of these
+tufts agree very well with the kind of work the woodpecker does; for in
+the hairy and the downy, which are continually drilling and raising a
+dust in rotten wood, they are very thick and noticeable, while in the
+red-head and the sapsucker they show as scarcely more than a few loose
+bristles, and in the flicker they barely cover the nostril. This seems a
+plain provision to keep the dust out of the bird's lungs; and we might
+cite as additional evidence the fact that the only other birds of
+similar tree-pecking habits, the nuthatches and the chickadees, have
+their nostrils protected in the same way. But we must always be cautious
+before drawing inferences of this sort to see what may be said on the
+other side. When we recollect that the crows and ravens and many kinds
+of finches, among other birds, none of which dig in the bark of trees or
+raise a dust, have their nostrils as completely covered, we see that we
+have perhaps discovered a _use_ for these nasal tufts but not the
+_cause_ of their being there. We must be careful not to mistake cause
+and accompaniment in our endeavor to explain differences in structure.
+
+Let us see what we have learned and how to interpret it:--
+
+That the woodpecker's bill is a combination of drill and pick-axe.
+
+That the shape varies with the use to which it is most commonly put.
+
+That the use varies with the food principally eaten; or, what is a step
+farther back, that the different kinds of food must be sought in
+different places and by different methods, and therefore require
+different tools.
+
+Therefore the shape of the woodpecker's bill has a direct relation to
+the kind of food he eats. Please notice that we do not assert that it
+_causes_ him to eat a certain kind of food nor that a certain diet may
+not have affected the shape of the bill, causing it to be what we now
+see. Both may be at least partially true, but to prove either or both
+would need profound study, and all that we have observed is that the
+shape of the woodpecker's bill is _adapted_ to his food and that it
+varies with the kind of food he eats, or, to be more exact, with his
+ways of procuring it.
+
+
+
+
+XII
+
+THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS FOOT
+
+
+We have studied the woodpecker's bill and have found that it is a very
+serviceable tool. We shall find that his feet are equally well adapted
+to their work.
+
+Here is the foot of a woodpecker. Observe how it differs from a
+chicken's foot, or a sparrow's foot. What is it that especially fits it
+for climbing? Perhaps you will notice that the tarsus is short, and you
+may be able to explain why it would be a disadvantage for a climbing
+bird to have long legs, as well as why it is a help for him to have long
+toes. Toes long and legs short is the rule with the woodpeckers.
+
+[Illustration: Foot of Woodpecker.]
+
+I never see a woodpecker's foot without thinking of an iceman's nippers
+with their short handles and long, sharp-toothed jaws. They are designed
+for similar uses,--to lift heavy weights by laying hold of smooth, flat
+surfaces. The iceman sets his nippers into the ice and lifts the block;
+but the bird sets his claws into the tree and lifts his own body.
+
+Suppose the nippers had one short jaw and one long one, would they then
+take as firm hold as they do with jaws of equal length? In perching
+birds the hind toe is much the shortest, but they sit balanced upon a
+limb and have merely to hold themselves in position. The woodpecker
+climbing a tree-trunk is out of balance; he would fall off unless he had
+a firm grip; and he could not get this firm hold if his hind toes were
+not long enough to give his foot a nearly equal spread back and forward.
+Other birds grasp a limb with the whole under surface of their toes, but
+the woodpecker when on a smooth, upright tree-trunk nips it only with
+his toenails. Try with your own hand to hold a stick as large and heavy
+as you can grasp, and you will see that when you clasp your hand around
+it as a perching bird takes hold of a perch, it makes little difference
+that the thumb is shorter than the fingers, but when you try to nip it
+with your finger tips alone, you must bend your fingers until they are
+not much longer than your thumb,--that is, a pair of nippers must be
+equal jawed.
+
+This simple illustration shows why the woodpecker's foot reaches as far
+backward as forward. But a sensible objection may be raised, namely,
+that as there are two hind toes of unequal length, it is by no means
+certain which is the more necessary.
+
+[Illustration: Diagram of right foot.]
+
+Scientists tell us that a woodpecker's foot, though it looks so unlike a
+chicken's, is really very much the same. When we ask how one of the
+front toes disappeared and how the extra hind toe came to be where it
+is, they tell us that there has been no addition and no loss, but the
+extra hind toe is only a front toe turned backward. They call it a
+_reversed fourth toe_. A bird's toes are numbered in order starting with
+the hind toe and going around the _inside_ of the foot to the outer or
+fourth toe. The hind toe is the thumb, and the others are numbered in
+the same order as the fingers of our hands. So we see that the
+woodpecker's real hind toe is rather small, like that of most birds. It
+looks very much as if it had been found _too_ small and as if another
+had turned back to help it do its work. Do you say that a bird cannot
+turn his toes about in this way? Most cannot, to be sure, but all of the
+owls can do it. An owl will sit either with two toes forward and two
+backward, or with three forward and one the other way. The owls have a
+reversible outer toe, and perhaps the woodpeckers did also before it
+became permanently reversed.
+
+[Illustration: Foot of Three-toed Woodpecker.]
+
+That this is exactly what had happened is curiously confirmed. There are
+a few woodpeckers in this country which have but three toes. They are
+the only North American land birds with less than four toes (though many
+sea and shore birds have but three). Compare this picture with a
+four-toed woodpecker's foot. One toe is gone completely, when or how no
+one can tell. But in some way the _first_ toe, the _thumb_, the one we
+always begin to count from, has disappeared. The one left is the
+reversed fourth toe, as we know by the number of joints in it.
+Undoubtedly this woodpecker needed a hind toe, but he must have needed a
+longer, stronger one than his natural first toe. A toe of the right
+length was supplied by turning one of the front toes back, and the short
+hind toe in some way disappeared.
+
+This may seem a roundabout way to show that a woodpecker's foot is a
+pair of nippers. First we studied nippers till we found out that they
+were not good nippers unless they were nearly equal-limbed. Next we
+studied the woodpecker's foot to learn about that extra hind toe. Then
+it occurred to us that four toes were not necessary, since some of our
+best climbers have but three. What was the essential point? Might it not
+be a foot equally divided without reference to the number of toes? But
+that is the principle of a pair of nippers. Then came the question, is
+there any similarity in their use? Yes, the nippers are used to lift
+heavy weights, and the woodpecker's foot is used to lift his heavy body
+in just the same way, by taking hold of a flat, smooth surface. We
+conclude that a wide-spread, equally divided, nipping foot would be the
+best device possible for the woodpecker's way of living, and we find by
+examination that every woodpecker shows this type of foot.
+
+There is additional evidence that this is the right explanation. Our
+only other North American birds that climb on the bark of trees
+professionally, as we may say, are the brown creepers and the
+nuthatches. In both these the tarsus is short, as we found it in the
+woodpeckers, and the hind toe and its claw are fully equal to the middle
+toe and claw, making an equally divided foot. On the other hand, the
+foot with two toes forward and two toes backward is confined neither to
+woodpeckers nor to climbing birds. The parrots, which climb after a
+fashion, have it; but so do the cuckoos, which do not climb, some of
+which, like our road-runner, or ground cuckoo of the West, are strictly
+terrestrial. The "yoking" of the toes may occur by the reversion of the
+fourth toe, as ordinarily, or of the second toe, as in the trogons; the
+arrangement appears to be definitely related to the distribution of the
+tendons that control the toes. But though accounting for the structure
+may give a clue to its descent, it does not justify its efficiency. The
+yoke-toed foot is not exclusively a climbing foot. All our families of
+climbers have at least one representative with but one toe behind, and
+this clearly proves that the yoke-toed structure is by no means
+necessary even though it may be an honorable inheritance among climbers.
+The natural conclusion is that the important point in climbing is not
+the number nor the arrangement of the toes, but the length of at least
+one hind toe so as to give an equally divided foot.
+
+There is an interesting point to notice about the woodpeckers. This
+reversed fourth toe is curiously variable in length. In the flickers,
+with its claw, it is a little shorter than the middle (third) toe with
+its claw; in the red-heads and their friends it a little exceeds the
+middle toe and claw; in the downy and the hairy it is much the longest
+toe, and in the ivory-billed woodpecker it is abnormally developed. We
+at once judge that it is some indication of the bird's manner of life,
+and we look for it to be largest in the species that live continually
+upon the trunks of trees, obtaining most of their food by drilling. We
+expect to see the finest development of drilling bill accompany this
+enormously developed toe, and we find them both in the ivory-billed
+woodpecker. In imagination we clearly see the use of it. The great bird,
+keen in his quest of grubs, sidling hastily round the tree, in an
+unsteady balance and unsupported by his tail, throws one long hind toe
+downward to steady himself, hooks the other into the bark above him, and
+hangs between the two as firmly supported as in his ordinary position.
+No doubt he does do this, but does it prove the supposition that the
+heaviest and most arboreal woodpeckers have the greatest development of
+the fourth toe? Not at all. There is our rare acquaintance the logcock,
+or pileated woodpecker, a bird nearly as large as the ivory-billed, one
+of the most persistent of our tree-climbers and more than any other
+woodpecker I ever observed given to scratching rapidly round and round a
+tree-trunk, clinging at ease in almost any position except
+head-downward, and drilling incessantly and at all seasons for grubs; he
+is a typical woodpecker of the largest size, but his hind toe and claw
+are, if anything, a trifle shorter than his middle toe with its claw. He
+throws it out and uses it as we have described, but it has not that
+disproportion to the other toes which we expected to find as the result
+of a strictly arboreal life.
+
+What have we proved? We have not shown that the long toe is _not_ more
+useful than the shorter one,--that is a matter of observation; but we
+have failed entirely to show that it is so, and this can be done only in
+one of two ways: either by proving that the logcock's habits are not
+what all previous observers have believed them to be,--which would be
+assuming a great burden of proof; or by demonstrating that his ancestry
+explains why his feet do not illustrate our theory,--and this, though it
+is undoubtedly the true solution, could be settled only by a very
+learned man.
+
+But we have encountered one truth which must always be held in mind in
+science--that a theory is not proved while a single fact remains
+rebellious and unsubdued. We might have examined every other woodpecker
+in the continent but just one; we might have seen that every other one
+agreed with our theory, as it does; we might have supposed that the
+explanation was good past doubting; but that one exception--if it was a
+logcock--would still over-turn the whole theory; and the very facts that
+we relied upon to strengthen us--its resemblance in size, habits, shape,
+and color to the ivory-billed woodpecker--have been the strongest
+possible means of totally demolishing our fine theory. We have learned,
+if nothing more, that all the facts must be examined and accounted for
+before an explanation is accepted as indisputable.
+
+
+
+
+XIII
+
+THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS TAIL
+
+
+If we study the woodpecker's anatomy and observe his broad, strong,
+highly-arched hip-bones and the heavy, triangular "ploughshare" bone in
+which the tail feathers are planted, as well as the stiffness and
+strength of the tail itself, we must conclude that it is not by accident
+that he uses his tail as a prop. The whole structure shows that the bird
+was intended "to lean on his tail." What we wish to discover is how good
+a tail it is to lean on.
+
+[Illustration: Tail of Hairy Woodpecker.]
+
+Our first impression is that the woodpecker's tail might be improved.
+Why are not the tips of the feathers stiffer? Why is it so rounded? Most
+of the work seems to fall on the middle feathers, and in some species,
+as the downy and the hairy woodpeckers, these end in decurved tips so
+soft and unresisting that they seem quite unfit to give any support.
+Would it not be better if the woodpecker's tail had been cut square
+across and made of feathers equally rigid and ending in short stiff
+spines? For we see that the woodpecker's tail is not only weak in its
+inner feathers, but weaker still in its outer ones, and it is stiff, in
+most species, only in the upper three fourths of its length.
+
+When we propose a change in nature it is wise to inquire whether our
+improvement has not been tried before and to learn how it worked. How
+many kinds of birds have we that use their tails for a support? What are
+their habits and what sort of tails have they?
+
+[Illustration: Tails of Brown Creeper (under surface) and Chimney Swift
+(upper surface.)]
+
+Besides the woodpeckers we have but two kinds of land birds that prop
+themselves with their tails,--the swifts and the creepers. The creeper
+has a tail very much like the woodpecker's as it is; while the chimney
+swift's is precisely like the woodpecker's as we thought it ought to be.
+But we observe that while the creeper's habits are almost precisely
+like the woodpecker's,--so much so that when we first make his
+acquaintance, some of us will be sure we have discovered a new kind of
+woodpecker,--the chimney swift has but one habit in common with the
+woodpecker, that of clinging to an upright surface and propping himself
+by his tail. If the bird with the tail most like the woodpecker's has
+the woodpecker's habits, is it not a fair inference that this form of
+tail is better fitted to this way of living than the other would be?
+
+Next, what variations in shapes do we observe among the woodpeckers
+themselves? The logcock and the ivory-billed woodpecker have the longest
+tails--because they are the largest birds. When we compare the length of
+the tails with the length of the birds we are surprised at the results.
+On measuring sixteen species, representing seven genera, I find that the
+tail is from three tenths to thirty-five hundredths of the entire
+length; that it is, in proportion, as long in the flicker as in the
+ivory-bill, as long in the downy as in the logcock, and longer (in the
+specimens measured) in the almost wholly terrestrial flicker than in the
+wholly arboreal logcock. Without much more study all that we can safely
+infer is that the woodpecker's tail is not far from one third the
+length of his whole body measured from the tip of the bill to the tip of
+the tail. Probably this is the proportion most convenient for his work.
+
+[Illustration: Middle tail feathers of Flicker, Ivory-billed Woodpecker,
+and Hairy Woodpecker.]
+
+All woodpeckers' tails agree in one particular: they are rounded at the
+end. At first sight we would say that some are but slightly rounded and
+others very deeply graduated; but as nearly as I can determine this is
+at least partly an optical illusion, explained by the great difference
+in the shape of the feathers making up the tail, which in some, as the
+flicker, are very broad and abruptly pointed, and in others taper
+gradually to the end and are very narrow for their length. The larger
+birds naturally appear to have longer tails, and the effect of narrow
+feathers is to make the tails appear longer and more sharply graduated
+than they really are. This diagram shows the shape of the curve in six
+species, and indicates that, while the curvature is less than we might
+expect, it bears some relation to the bird's way of living; for we see
+that the strictly arboreal woodpeckers have more pointed tails than the
+terrestrial species, and that the amount of gradation bears a direct
+relation to the amount of time spent upon the tree-trunks.
+
+There is a third difference, the shape of the individual feather, to
+which we shall refer again; but now we wish to examine the uses and
+meaning of the curved end.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+ Diagram of curvature of tails of Woodpeckers. Drawn to scale.
+
+ _a_, _a_, point of insertion in
+ rump.
+
+ _a_, _b_, outer tail feather.
+
+ _a_, _c_, middle tail feather.
+
+If the outer tail feather were of the same length in all cases, the
+curve at the end of the tail would be represented by the dotted lines.
+
+ 1. Flicker.
+
+ 2. Red-headed Woodpecker.
+
+ 3. Downy Woodpecker.
+
+ 4. Logcock.
+
+ 5. Central American Ivory-billed
+ Woodpecker.
+
+ 6. North American Ivory-billed
+ Woodpecker.
+
+
+I will show you how to prove this point so that you may be satisfied
+about it even if you should never see a woodpecker. We will make a
+little experiment, so simple that even a child can understand it.
+
+First, how many shapes can any bird's tail have? It may be one of three
+general patterns, and it can be nothing else unless we combine those
+patterns. It may be square across the end, it may have the middle
+feathers longest, or it may have the outer feathers longest. To one of
+these patterns every form of birds' tails may be referred; you can
+invent no other shape.
+
+Let us assume that you know nothing whatever of a woodpecker's tail
+except that it has ten feathers, is used as a prop, and is held at an
+angle of thirty or forty degrees with the tree-trunk. Now, take three
+strips of paper of the same width and length, and of any size not
+inconveniently small. Fold them all down the centre. Cut one square
+across; cut one with a rounded end and the third with a forked end,
+making them of any shape you please so long as the three papers are of
+the same length. To give our models a fair test they must be of the same
+width and length. Next, pin a sheet of paper of any size you please into
+the form of a cylinder and stand it on end to represent a tree-trunk.
+Then fit the patterns to the tree-trunk and see which is the form that
+would give the most support.
+
+[Illustration: Patterns of tails.]
+
+But first, in how many ways is it possible for a bird to use his tail as
+a prop? He may of course hold it open or closed; and the open tail may
+be held in a single plane, "spread flat," as we say; or curved up at the
+edges, like a crow blackbird's; or curved down at the edges. And the
+closed tail may be held in a single plane; or, by dropping each pair of
+feathers a little, in several planes. Thus we see there are five
+positions in which each shape may be held against the cylinder of paper.
+Try each one against it, holding it first in the open positions and then
+after folding the paper like a bird's tail with the outer feathers
+underneath, in the closed positions. The size of the model tree-trunk
+and the shape you cut your curves will make the results vary a little,
+but you will be surprised to observe, if your models are not too small,
+how many times you will get the same answers. Note the number and
+position of the pairs that touch:
+
+ _Spread._ _Square end._ _Forked end._ _Round end._
+
+ one plane, varies varies middle pair
+ curved up, middle pair middle pair middle pair
+ curved down, all all all
+ _Closed._
+ one plane, outer pair outer pair middle pair
+ different planes, outer pair outer pair all
+
+Which shape brings the most feathers into use in all positions? Which
+positions bring most feathers into use? We see at once that the rounded
+end has a decided advantage, that the middle pair of feathers is used in
+all possible positions, that the pair next outside is the next
+important, and that the spread tail curving downward at the edges and
+the closed tail in different planes are the two shapes which give the
+best support. There is therefore a reason for the rounded end which we
+said was the rule among the woodpeckers.
+
+Our little experiment is what we call a _deduction_. It shows us what we
+ought to expect under certain imaginary conditions. But it does not show
+us what actually exists, so there often comes a time when our deductions
+are faulty because Nature has done some unexpected thing, as when we
+found the single exception of the logcock's foot upsetting a fine theory
+of ours. A deduction must always be compared with facts, and is worth
+little or nothing if a single fact of the series we are studying is not
+explained by it. This time all the facts do agree; for I had, before we
+made our experiment, examined the tails of every species of woodpecker
+ever found in North America, and there was no exception to the rounded
+end. I had already drawn my conclusion that this form was better
+adapted to life on a tree-trunk than the square or the forked tail would
+be, reasoning by a different process called _induction_. An induction
+examines many, and, if possible, all the facts before drawing any
+conclusion; a deduction examines the facts after the conclusion is
+reached. There is no hard-and-fast line between the two kinds of
+reasoning, but we may say that a _deduction is reasoning out a guess and
+an induction is guessing out a reason_. Deductions are easier and
+quicker; inductions are surer, and in preparing them we often make other
+discoveries.
+
+The rounded tail is no doubt the best; but we have yet to decide whether
+the sharper curve is more advantageous than the lesser curve, as we
+thought probable from our observations. And there is still another
+deduction from our experiment which we did not make. If in the rounded
+tail the middle pairs of feathers do most of the work, and if use
+increases the size and efficiency of a part, which is almost an axiom in
+science, we should expect to find the middle tail feathers not only
+strongest in all woodpeckers but also strongest in increasing ratio in
+the species that use them most. To determine this we must study the use
+of the tail and the structure and shape of the individual tail
+feathers.
+
+We should remark, perhaps, that the woodpecker's tail is always composed
+of twelve feathers--ten pointed rectrices and two tiny abortive feathers
+so short and so hidden that no attention is paid to them. The ten
+principal feathers are arranged in corresponding pairs numbered from the
+outside to the centre as first, second, third, fourth, and fifth pairs.
+
+In the flickers all ten feathers have wide vanes and are similar in
+everything but the shape; all are more or less pointed. The flicker's
+tail looks and feels very much like that of any other bird except that
+the shafts are stiffer and the vanes contract to an acuminate tip. But
+as we take up the other species we notice a change, not only in the
+shape of the feathers but much more in their texture and in the
+difference between the various pairs. While in the flicker four pairs
+out of five are pointed and all are rigid, in the downy and the hairy
+three pairs out of five seem to be too soft to give any support, the
+sharp points have disappeared, and the tail has lost much of its
+stiffness. The two middle pairs of feathers are the only ones capable of
+doing much work and they are wavering and infirm at the tips where we
+should expect them to be strongest. In the logcock it is about the
+same,--two pairs are apparently unfit for work, one pair is infirm, and
+the two middle pairs are compelled to give all the support, except the
+little contributed by the third pair. In the ivory-billed woodpecker the
+two outer pairs are of no assistance and the three central ones do the
+work, and here again we find the base of the rectrices rigid and
+inflexible and the last fourth of their length weak and yielding. But
+what a difference in the individual feather! It is well able to do all
+the work; for, except for that weak tip which we cannot now explain, it
+is one of the toughest and strongest feathers to be found. The shaft is
+broad and flat, as elastic as a watch-spring; it looks like a band of
+burnished steel as it runs down between the vanes. And the vanes
+themselves are of a very curious pattern. They curl under at the edges
+so that we do not see their whole width, and the barbs crowd so thickly
+upon each other that they over-lie until they present an edge three or
+four broad. Indeed, the under side of one of these tail feathers reminds
+one of nothing so much as of the under side of a star-fish's arm with
+its two long lines of ambulacral suckers on each side of a central
+groove, so thickly do the spiny vanes of these strong rectrices over
+ride and crowd together. These spines lay hold of the bark of the tree,
+rank after rank, hundreds of bristling points that cannot be dislodged
+except by a forward motion of the bird or by lifting the tail. Compared
+with this, the spiny points on the flicker's tail were a poor invention.
+This device, which takes hold like a wool card, or a wire hair-brush,
+cannot slip from place. We begin to see, too, the use of that weak and
+flexible tip; it is to press down upon the tree-trunk a flat surface
+sufficiently large to hold hundreds of these little spiny points against
+the bark. The ivory-bill braces against this with the stiff upper part
+of the shaft and has a support that will not slip. The upper part of the
+shaft acts like a spring also, and adds tremendous force to the blow of
+the bill. Watch a hairy woodpecker when hard at work and see how his
+legs and tail form a triangular base by bracing against each other, and
+how his blow is delivered, not with the head alone, but with the whole
+body, swinging from the hips, the apex of the triangle on which he
+rests. He swings like a man wielding a sledge hammer, and to the
+strength of his neck adds the weight of his body, the spring of his
+tail, and the momentum of a blow delivered from a greater height. When
+the little hairy woodpecker does so much with his weak body, we can
+imagine what great birds like the logcock and the ivory-billed
+woodpecker, with their tremendous beaks, their huge claws, their springy
+tails, and their great physical strength can do. They are magnificent
+birds, the terror of all the grubs that hide in tree-trunks.
+
+[Illustration: Under side of middle tail feather of Ivory-billed
+Woodpecker.]
+
+One point we have left unexplained: What is the advantage, if there is
+any, in the sharper curve to the tails of the arboreal woodpeckers? It
+is a simple question. The curve is caused by the unequal length of the
+tail feathers; each tail feather is a prop, and by their inequality they
+become props of different lengths. Now ask any carpenter which will best
+support a tottering wall--props all of the same length set at the same
+angle, or props of different lengths set at different angles? His answer
+will help you to solve the problem. But if a little is good, why are not
+all the pairs used as props? Partly, perhaps, because the woodpecker is
+always crowded for houseroom, and while he must have tail enough, he
+cannot afford to have any which he does not use. Did you ever think what
+an inconvenience any tail at all must be in a woodpecker's hole?
+
+
+
+
+XIV
+
+THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS TONGUE
+
+
+We have seen how the woodpecker spears his grubs: now we will study his
+spear.
+
+[Illustration: Tongue of Hairy Woodpecker. (After Lucas.)]
+
+There are many interesting points about a woodpecker's tongue, and they
+are not hard to understand. If a woodpecker would kindly let us take
+hold of his tongue and pull it out to its full extent we should be
+afraid we were "spoiling his machinery," for the tongue can be drawn out
+almost incredibly--between two and three inches in a hairy woodpecker
+and more in a flicker. A strange-looking object it is, much resembling
+an angle-worm in form, color, and feeling; for it is round, soft, and
+sticky, except at the flat, horny, bayonet-pointed tip, and as it lies
+in the mouth it is wrinkled like the wrist of a loose glove; but it
+grows smaller and smoother the more we pull it out. Evidently we are
+only drawing it into its skin. But where does so much tongue come from?
+Does it stretch like a piece of elastic cord? Or is a part hidden
+somewhere? And if so, where is it kept?
+
+[Illustration: Tongue-bones of Flicker. (After Lucas.)]
+
+ _a._ Cerato-hyals, fused and short.
+ _b._ Basi-hyal, long, slender.
+ _c._ Cerato-branchials.
+ _d._ Epibranchials.
+ Basi-branchial is wanting.
+
+
+These questions are answered by studying the bones of the tongue, for
+without bones it could not be guided as swiftly and surely as it is.
+Indeed, all tongues have bones in them, as you will discover by cutting
+carefully the slices near the root of an ox-tongue; but no other
+creature has such long and elaborate tongue-bones as some of the
+woodpeckers. They are the slenderest and most delicate little bony rods,
+joined end to end, but not really hinged nor needing to be, because they
+are so elastic. Here are the bones of a flicker's tongue. The little
+knob at the end, marked _a_, bore the horny point of the tongue and
+directed it; the straight shaft marked _b_ was inside the round part of
+the tongue as it lay within the bird's mouth; but what was done with
+these two long branches, fully three quarters of the entire length of
+the bones? They are too sharply curved to pass down the bird's throat,
+and, not being jointed, they cannot be doubled back in his mouth. They
+were tucked away very neatly and curiously. As the hyoid or tongue-bone
+lies in the mouth its branches diverge just in front of the gullet, and,
+traveling along the inner sides of the fork of the lower jaw, pass up
+over the top of the skull, looking in their sheath of muscles like two
+tiny whipcords. But still the bones are too long by perhaps half an inch
+for the place they occupy, and the ends must be neatly disposed of.
+Usually both pass to the right nasal opening and along the hollow of the
+upper mandible. Very rarely they may curl down around the eyeball in a
+spiral spring. So when the flicker thrusts out his tongue he feels the
+pull in the end of his nose, for the tip of the tongue being run out,
+the long slender bones are drawn out of their hiding-places, down over
+the skull until they lie flat along the roof of his mouth. As soon as
+he wishes to shut his bill, back fly the little bones guided by their
+hollow sheaths of elastic muscle into their hiding-place in the top of
+the bill. The muscular covering is a part of the same soft envelope that
+we saw lying in wrinkles at the root of the tongue. It covers the whole
+length of the little bones just as the woven outside covers an elastic
+cord.
+
+[Illustration: Skull of Woodpecker, showing bones of tongue. _a._ Upper
+end of windpipe and gullet.]
+
+[Illustration: Hyoids of Sapsucker and Golden-fronted Woodpecker.]
+
+Not all woodpeckers have tongues precisely like this. The sapsucker's is
+the shortest of any, and reaches barely beyond the hinge of the jaws. In
+the Lewis's woodpecker and others of his genus the branches of the hyoid
+extend part-way up the back of the skull but in the kinds that live
+principally upon borers they are very long and resemble the flicker's in
+arrangement. The only other North American birds that have a tongue
+built upon this plan are the hummingbirds, in which also it is
+extensile. The flicker, in proportion to his size, has the longest
+tongue of any bird known.
+
+
+
+
+XV
+
+HOW EACH WOODPECKER IS FITTED FOR HIS OWN KIND OF LIFE
+
+
+We have studied the woodpeckers at some length: first, what all of them
+do; next, what some that are peculiar in their ways do; lastly, how each
+is fitted for a particular kind of life. At first we were inclined to
+think they were all alike; but now we begin to see that there are very
+real differences between them,--in tails, feet, bills, and tongues, and
+at the same time in their food and habits.
+
+The flicker's tail is less sharply curved than that of any other
+woodpecker,--a sign that he is probably not exclusively a tree-dweller;
+his bill is curved and rounded, a pick-axe rather than a drill,--an
+indication that he does not dig for grubs; his feet do not tell us much;
+but his long extensile tongue shows that, whatever he feeds upon, he
+seeks it in holes. We find a tongue like this in no other bird, but
+among mammals the aard-vark, the ant-bear, and the pangolins are all
+similarly equipped, and all live on ants which they extract from their
+mounds and burrows in hundreds by means of these round, sticky, and
+extensile tongues. This is precisely the way the flicker gets his
+living. He lives principally upon the ground or near it, pecks very
+little except when digging his nest, and feeds largely upon ants,
+thrusting his head into the ant-hills and drawing out the ants glued to
+his tongue rather than speared by it. As he has been known to eat three
+thousand ants for a meal, we see how much easier this is than spearing
+them one by one.
+
+The red-head is another type. The bill is still nearly of the pick-axe
+model, the feet not especially different from the flicker's, the tail
+rather better adapted to life on a tree-trunk, and the tongue entirely
+unlike the flicker's,--not very extensile and heavily clothed near the
+tip with long, thick, recurved bristles. We infer that though he may
+climb well, he is not a drilling woodpecker to any great extent, and
+that his tongue is adapted neither to extracting borers nor to eating
+ants from their burrows. His habits bear out the inference. He is
+arboreal, but his food is either vegetable or picked up from the
+surface, rasped up rather than speared.
+
+The sapsucker presents still another variation. The points to the tail
+feathers are more acuminate and the tail itself more resembles that of
+the tree-dwelling woodpeckers in shape; the feet are fitted for clinging
+to the trunk; the bill, now perfectly straight and no longer smoothly
+rounded but buttressed by strong angles that spring from the base and
+run down toward the tip, is the bill of a woodpecker that lives by
+drilling; but the tongue is wholly unadapted to catching grubs. What
+kind of food can an arboreal woodpecker with a drilling bill find upon a
+tree-trunk when his tongue can be extended only a fifth of an inch, and
+is furnished with a brush of bristles at the end? We have answered that
+question before: he eats the inner bark of trees and laps up the sap,
+for which this brushy tip is excellently fitted. It has been observed
+that the tongue much resembles the tongues of insect-eating birds, which
+cannot be extended beyond the end of the bill. It is true that the
+sapsucker catches great numbers of insects, taking them on the wing like
+a flycatcher. But he also eats nearly as many ants as the flicker,
+though their tongues are totally unlike. We have made the mistake
+perhaps of thinking that ants live only underground and can be obtained
+only by tongues like those of the flicker and the ant-bear, which hunt
+them there. But ants are abundant on the surface of the ground, and
+they excavate long tunnels in rotten wood. The black bear is a famous
+ant-hunter, yet his tongue is like a dog's and he gets his ants by
+lapping them up after he has torn open the rotten logs in which they
+live. This is the way that the sapsucker obtains his ants, and the brush
+of stiff hairs is a help to him in such work. We see, then, that it is
+not so much the food as the manner of feeding that explains the form of
+the tongue.
+
+The downy and the hairy are a step farther along in their development.
+The fourth toe is longer than the others, a condition that we do not
+find in any of the woodpeckers not strictly arboreal; the tail is of the
+improved pattern, holding by a brush of bristles rather than by one
+stiff point at the end of each feather; the bill is heavier, broader at
+the base, more heavily ridged, and in every way a stronger tool; and the
+tongue is highly extensible and of the spear pattern, sharp-pointed and
+barbed with recurved hooks. Everything about these birds indicates that
+they are fitted to live on tree-trunks and to dig for borers. This,
+indeed, is what they do.
+
+But the great logcock and the ivory-billed woodpecker, though of the
+same type as the other larvæ-eating woodpeckers, are more highly
+developed along the same line. We notice the great strength of the
+feet; the claws, as large and as sharp as a cat's; the enormous weight
+and strength of the bill, compared with that of the other woodpeckers,
+which enables them to cut into the hardest wood and even into frozen
+green timber; and the great development of the tail, which now becomes a
+strong spring to support and aid the bird in his work.
+
+As we try to group these particulars under general heads, we see that we
+have observed three things:--
+
+_That the structure of a bird is adapted to its kind of life._
+
+_That the structure varies by small degrees with the kind of life._
+
+_That the kind of life is conditioned largely upon the kind of food and
+upon the method of procuring it, more particularly the latter._
+
+These are not so much different truths as three aspects of one truth.
+When we study the first we see why birds are grouped together into
+orders and families: we study their resemblances. When we observe the
+second we see why they are divided into species, for we note their
+differences. But when we consider the third and reflect that birds have
+the power to choose new kinds of food or new places and means of getting
+it, we see how it is that there can come to be new kinds of birds, new
+subspecies and species, springing up from time to time. Wonderful and
+improbable as it seems, there is more reason to believe than there is to
+doubt that new kinds of animals and plants are constantly in process of
+making; that the laws of change are constantly at work, adapting
+creatures to their surroundings or crushing them out of existence
+because they will not learn new ways. And it is probable that these
+differences which we mark in the woodpeckers have been the result of
+efforts to adapt themselves to a peculiar kind of life where food was
+abundant; and also that by acquired habits and by acquired tastes for
+different kinds of foods they will be subject to still further
+variations in the future.
+
+
+
+
+XVI
+
+THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN
+
+
+But if the birds are making themselves into new species, where is the
+place for God in the universe? Did not God make all kinds of creatures
+in the beginning? How can they go on being made without God?
+
+These are questions every one ought to ask, but--did God leave his world
+after He had made it and go a long way off? Did He wind it up like a
+watch to go till it should run down? Is the world a machine, or is it
+alive?
+
+Long ago the wise and good man Socrates argued that if you did not know
+there was a God at all, you could at least infer it because everything
+was so wonderfully made. "There is our body," said he: "every part of it
+so perfect and so reasonable. Consider how the eyes not only please us
+with agreeable sensations but are protected in every way. The eyebrows
+stand like a thicket to keep the perspiration from them, the lids are a
+curtain to shut out too great light, the lashes screen them from
+dust,--everything is planned for some wise and reasonable end. And
+where the evidence of design is so convincing must we not believe that
+there was a Designer?" Words like these he spoke, and we know because
+everything is so perfectly contrived that there must have been a
+contriver, who knew all from the beginning. We are compelled to believe
+that there is a God.
+
+Shall we believe it less because we find in the creatures about us
+intelligence and the power to care for their own lives? Has God gone on
+a visit because these living creatures are looking out for themselves?
+Were they made less perfectly in the beginning because when new
+conditions surround them they are able to change to meet the strange
+requirements? This is not less evidence of a Designer, but more. It was
+long said that the existence of a watch was proof of a watchmaker who
+had planned and put together all the parts so that they worked
+harmoniously. But if the watch had the power to grow small to fit a
+small pocket, or large to fit a large one, to become luminous by night,
+and to correct its own time by the sun instead of being regulated by
+outside interference, what should we have said--that it was proof there
+was no watchmaker? or that it showed a far more skillful one, since he
+could make a living, self-regulating, adaptive watch?
+
+And so of the world and the creatures in it. Every evidence we get that
+they can care for themselves, that they can adapt themselves to new
+conditions, that they are intelligent and reasonable, capable of
+improvement in habits or in structure, is so much surer proof that a
+wise God made them what they are. Evolution--for that is the name by
+which we call these changes--does not take God out of the universe but
+makes the need of Him stronger. The argument from design is immensely
+strengthened when we consider that we have not only an obedient machine
+acting according to a few fundamental rules, but one that is intelligent
+also and capable of self-modification.
+
+
+
+
+APPENDIX
+
+_Explanation of Terms._
+
+
+[Illustration: Head of a Flicker.]
+
+ _a._ Forehead; _b._ crown; _c._ occiput; _d._ nape; _e._ chin; _f._
+ throat; _g._ jaw-patch, or mustache.
+
+ _Occipital_ means "on the occiput."
+
+ _Nuchal_ means "on the nape."
+
+ _Primaries_ are the nine or ten wing-quills borne upon the last
+ joint of the wing.
+
+ _Secondaries_ are the wing-quills attached to the fore-arm bones.
+
+ _Tertiaries_ are the wing-quills springing from the upper arm
+ bones.
+
+ _Wing coverts_ are the shorter lines of feathers overlapping these
+ long quills.
+
+ _Tail coverts_ are the lengthened feathers that overlap the root of
+ the tail both above and below, called respectively upper and under
+ tail coverts.
+
+ _Ear coverts_ are the feathers that over-lie the ear, often
+ specially modified or colored.
+
+ _Rump_, the space between the middle of the back and the root of
+ the tail.
+
+ [M] is the sign used to indicate the male sex.
+
+ [F] is the sign used to indicate the female sex.
+
+ A _subspecies_ is a geographical race, modified in size, color, or
+ proportions chiefly by the influence of climate. These variations
+ are especially marked in non-migratory birds of wide distribution,
+ subject, therefore, to climatic extremes. The Downy and the Hairy
+ Woodpeckers, for example, are split up into numerous races. It
+ should be remembered that when a species has been separated into
+ races, or subspecies, all the subspecies are of equal rank, even
+ though they are differently designated. The one originally
+ discovered and first described bears the old Latin name which
+ consisted of two words, while the new ones are designated by triple
+ Latin names--the old binomial and a new name in addition. The
+ binomial indicates the form first described. The forms designated
+ by trinomials may be equally well known, abundant, and widely
+ distributed. For example, among the woodpeckers, the northern form
+ of the Hairy Woodpecker was first discovered and bears the name
+ _Dryobates villosus_; but the first Downy Woodpecker described was
+ a southern bird, and the northern form was not separated until a
+ few years ago, so that the southern bird is the type, and the
+ northern one bears the trinomial, _Dryobates pubescens medianus_.
+
+ _North America_, by the decision of the American Ornithologists'
+ Union, is held to include the continent north of the present
+ boundary between Mexico and the United States, with Greenland, the
+ peninsula of Lower California, and the islands adjacent naturally
+ belonging to the same.
+
+ The following key and descriptions will enable the student to
+ identify any woodpecker known to occur within these limits:
+
+A. KEY TO THE WOODPECKERS OF NORTH AMERICA.
+
+Family characteristics: color always striking, usually in spots, bars,
+or patches of contrasting colors, especially black and white. Sexes
+usually unlike; male always with some portion of red or yellow about
+head, throat, or neck. Tails stiff, rounded, composed of ten fully
+developed pointed feathers (and two undeveloped feathers). Wings large,
+rounded, with long, conspicuous secondaries, and short coverts. Bill
+straight, stout, of medium length. Toes four, arranged in pairs, except
+in the three-toed genus. Iris brown, except when noted. Marked by a
+habit of clinging to upright surfaces and digging a deep hole in a
+tree-trunk for nesting. Eggs always pearly white.
+
+I. Very large--18 inches _or more_; conspicuously crested. A. II. Medium
+or small--14 inches _or less_; never crested. B.
+
+ A. a^1 Bill gleaming _ivory white_; fourth toe decidedly longest.
+ Ivory-billed Woodpecker. 1.
+
+ a^2 Bill _blackish_; fourth toe not decidedly longest.
+ Pileated Woodpecker or Logcock. 14.
+
+ B. a^1 Toes three; [M] with _yellow_ crown.
+ Three-toed Woodpeckers. 9 & 10.
+
+ a^2 Toes four; crown never yellow (b).
+
+ b^1 _Not spotted nor streaked either above or below_ (c).
+
+ c^1 Body clear black; _head white_.
+ White-headed Woodpecker. 8.
+
+ c^2 Blue-black above; _rump white_; _head_ and _neck red_.
+ Red-headed Woodpecker. 15.
+
+ c^3 Greenish black above, with _pinkish red belly_.
+ Lewis's Woodpecker. 17.
+
+ c^4 Greenish black with _sulphur yellow forehead_ and
+ _throat._
+ Californian Woodpecker. 16.
+
+ c^5 Glossy blue-black with _scarlet throat_ and _yellow
+ belly_.
+ Male of Williamson's Sapsucker. 13.
+
+ b^2 _Spotted with black or brown on breast and sides_,
+ but not streaked nor barred with white (d).
+
+ d^1 _Brown_ spots on breast and sides; upper parts plain
+ brown.
+ Arizona Woodpecker. 7.
+
+ d^2 _Black_ spots on breast and sides; wings and tail
+ brilliantly colored beneath (e).
+
+ e^1 Wings and tail _golden_ beneath; mustaches
+ _black_ in male, wanting in female.
+ Flicker. 21.
+
+ e^2 Wings and tail _golden_ beneath; mustaches
+ _red_ in both sexes.
+ Gilded Flicker. 23.
+
+ e^3 Wings and tail _golden red_ beneath; mustaches red.
+ Red-shafted Flicker. 22.
+
+ e^4 Wings and tail _golden red_ beneath; mustaches red;
+ crown brown.
+ Guadalupe Flicker. 24.
+
+ b^3 _Streaked, spotted, or barred with white on back and wings_ (f).
+
+ f^1 _Back streaked_, _plain_, or _varied_, _never_ barred
+ with white; wings _spotted_ with white (g).
+
+ g^1 _Clear_ white and black; _white streak down the
+ back_ (h).
+
+ h^1 Medium size, 9-11 inches.
+ Hairy Woodpecker. 2.
+
+ h^2 Small size, 6-7 inches.
+ Downy Woodpecker. 3.
+
+ g^2 _Grayish_ white and black; _sides closely barred_ (i).
+
+ i^1 Back plain black, white _stripe_ down side of throat.
+ Female of Arctic Three-toed Woodpecker. 9.
+
+ i^2 Back with interrupted white stripe, white _line_
+ down side of throat.
+ Female of American Three-toed Woodpecker. 10.
+ (NOTE.--The males are similar with the addition
+ of the yellow crown. The three toes
+ cannot ordinarily be seen in life.)
+
+ g^3 _Yellowish_ (often dingy or smutty), white and black;
+ under parts yellowish; back varied with white, no
+ line nor streak; _rump white_; _white wing-bars_ (j).
+
+ j^1 Breast with black patch; head of adult with red
+ patches.
+ Yellow-bellied Sapsucker. 11.
+
+ j^2 Breast and head red.
+ Red-breasted Sapsucker. 12.
+
+ f^2 _Back barred with white_; wings spotted or barred with
+ white (k).
+
+ k^1 Belly _white; ear coverts white_.
+ Red-cockaded Woodpecker. 4.
+
+ k^2 Belly _white; forehead black_.
+ Nuttall's Woodpecker. 6.
+
+ k^3 Belly _smoky brown_; forehead and breast same.
+ Texan Woodpecker. 5.
+
+ k^4 Belly _sulphur or lemon yellow_.
+ Female of Williamson's Woodpecker. 13.
+
+ k^5 Belly _pinkish red_.
+ Red-bellied Woodpecker. 18.
+
+ k^6 Belly _yellow_, hind neck and forehead orange.
+ Golden-fronted Woodpecker. 19.
+
+ k^7 Belly _yellow_, hind neck brown.
+ Gila Woodpecker. 20.
+
+B. DESCRIPTIONS OF THE WOODPECKERS OF NORTH AMERICA.
+
+The following are descriptions of all the species of Woodpeckers found
+in North America, arranged in their proper genera and in the order given
+in the check list of the American Ornithologists' Union, 1895; with the
+range of species and subspecies as defined by the same authority or by
+Bendire's "Life Histories of North American Birds."
+
+ 1. CAMPEPHILUS PRINCIPALIS, _Ivory-billed Woodpecker_.
+ Glossy black except _white secondaries_ (very conspicuous) and
+ white stripe from beneath ear down neck and shoulders; white
+ nasal tufts; _bill white_. Both sexes crested; [M]
+ with scarlet occipital crest, [F] with crest
+ black. Iris yellow. 20 inches.
+ Cypress swamps of Gulf States, locally distributed.
+ The largest, shyest, and rarest of our woodpeckers.
+
+ 2. DRYOBATES VILLOSUS, _Hairy Woodpecker_.
+ Black and white. Upper parts glossy black with a broad _white
+ stripe_ down the back; wings thickly spotted with white; under
+ parts white; three outer pairs of tail feathers white; two white
+ and two black stripes on sides of head; nasal tufts brownish
+ white. [M] with scarlet occipital patch. 9-10
+ inches.
+ Eastern United States except South Atlantic and Gulf
+ States, with the following subspecies, all the races being
+ resident the year round, and breeding in most places
+ where they are found:--
+
+ a. _D. v. leucomelas_, _Northern Hairy Woodpecker_. 10-11 inches.
+ Larger, whiter.
+ British America.
+
+ b. _D. v. audubonii_, _Southern Hairy Woodpecker_. 8-8.5 inches.
+ Smaller, more dingy white.
+ South Atlantic and Gulf States.
+
+ c. _D. v. harrisii_, _Harris's Woodpecker_. 9-10 inches.
+ Upper parts with less white, few wing spots, under parts
+ soiled white or smoky brown; larger than next.
+ Northwest coast, northern California to Alaska.
+
+ d. _D. v. hyloscopus_, _Cabanis's Woodpecker_. 8.5-9.5 inches.
+ White stripe down back very wide; purer white below than
+ _harrisii_; fewer wing spots than _leucomelas_ and _villosus_.
+ Western United States, except northwest coast, east to
+ the Rocky Mountains.
+
+ e. _D. v. monticola_, _Rocky Mountain Woodpecker_. 10-11 inches.
+ Larger; more white spots near bend of wing and secondaries
+ than _hyloscopus_, fewer than _villosus_; pure white below.
+ Rocky Mountains west to Uintah Mountains, Utah.
+
+ 3. DRYOBATES PUBESCENS, _Southern Downy Woodpecker_.
+ Black and white; broad _white stripe_ down back; wings thickly
+ spotted with white; under parts white. [M] with
+ scarlet occipital patch. A miniature Hairy Woodpecker, differing
+ only in having _four_ outer pairs of tail feathers more or less
+ white and the _outermost barred_. 6.5 inches. Like the Hairy
+ Woodpecker, the Downy and its subspecies are resident and breed
+ wherever they occur.
+ South Atlantic and Gulf States.
+
+ a. _D. p. gairdnerii_, _Gairdner's Woodpecker_. 6.75 inches.
+ Bears same relation to Downy that Harris's does to Hairy
+ Woodpecker; under parts smoky white; wings spots few.
+ Pacific coast north to about lat. 55°.
+
+ b. _D. p. oreoecus_, _Batchelder's Woodpecker_. 7.5 inches.
+ Under parts pure white; under tail coverts unspotted;
+ fewer wing spots than _medianus_ and _pubescens_.
+ Rocky Mountain region of United States.
+
+ c. _D. p. medianus_, _Downy Woodpecker_. 7 inches.
+ The larger, whiter form seen in New England and the
+ Northern States.
+
+ d. _D. p. nelsoni_, _Nelson's Downy Woodpecker_.
+ Whiter, larger, with fewer black bars on outer tail
+ feathers.
+ Alaska and region north of 55°.
+
+ 4. DRYOBATES BOREALIS, _Red-cockaded Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts black _barred_ with white, under parts dingy white;
+ sides streaked and spotted with black; wings spotted with white;
+ outer tail feathers barred; nasal tufts and _large ear patch
+ white_; stripe of black down side of neck. [M] with
+ a tiny tuft of scarlet feathers on each side of head. 7.5-8.5
+ inches.
+ Pine woods of southeastern United States, from Tennessee
+ southwest to eastern Texas and the Indian Territory;
+ casual north to Pennsylvania.
+
+ 5. DRYOBATES SCALARIS BAIRDI, _Texan Woodpecker_, _Ladder-backed
+ Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts barred with black and white on back, wings,
+ and outer tail feathers; sides of head striped; forehead,
+ nasal feathers, and under parts _smoky gray_, brownest on
+ belly; _crown speckled with white or red_; [M]
+ with nape crimson. 7-7.5 inches.
+ Southern border of United States, Texas to California,
+ north to southwestern Utah and southern Nevada; generally
+ resident.
+
+ a. _D. s. lucasanus_, _St. Lucas Woodpecker_. Larger.
+ Lower California, north to 34° in Colorado desert.
+ These are both subspecies of a Mexican species not occurring
+ within our limits.
+
+ 6. DRYOBATES NUTTALLII, _Nuttall's Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts barred with black and white; under parts and
+ _outer tail feathers white_ or dingy white; nasal tufts white;
+ _forehead and crown black sprinkled with white_. [M]
+ with red on occiput and nape. 7-7.5 inches.
+ Southern Oregon and California west of Sierra Nevada
+ and Cascade Ranges; most common in the oak belt of
+ the foothills.
+ Easily distinguished from Downy Woodpecker by being
+ barred on the back, instead of striped.
+
+ 7. DRYOBATES ARIZONÆ, _Arizona Woodpecker_.
+ _Upper parts plain brown, not spotted nor streaked_; primaries
+ dotted with fine white dots; outer tail feathers barred;
+ under parts white, _thickly spotted_ (except throat), _with large,
+ round, brown spots_. [M] with red occipital band.
+ 7.5-8.5 inches.
+ Southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico; among
+ oaks of the foothills from 4000 to 7000 feet elevation.
+
+ 8. XENOPICUS ALBOLARVATUS, _White-headed Woodpecker_.
+ Glossy black all over, except showy white patch on primaries,
+ and _head and throat pure white_ (forehead and crown
+ sometimes grayish). [M] with broad occipital band of
+ scarlet. 9 inches. "Iris pinkish red" (Bendire).
+ Mountains of Pacific coast, east to western Nevada and
+ western Idaho, usually in the pine and fir forests above
+ 4000 feet altitude.
+
+ 9. PICOIDES ARCTICUS, _Arctic Three-toed Woodpecker_.
+ _Glossy black above, unmarked_ except by fine white spots on
+ primaries; under parts grayish white, sides thickly barred
+ black and white; three outer pairs of tail feathers white,
+ sides of throat with broad _white stripe_. [M] with
+ _large crown patch of deep yellow_. 9.5 inches.
+ British America, south into the northern tier of States
+ and into the Sierra Nevada Mountains to Lake Tahoe.
+ Most commonly seen in the track of forest fires, where it
+ is usually abundant for about two years; rare outside of the
+ extensive soft wood tracts, and usually found singly or in
+ pairs except when on burnt land. I have found this species
+ far more common than the next, and the best mark in life
+ to be the white _stripe_ on the neck, in distinction from the
+ white _line_ of _P. americanus_.
+
+ 10. PICOIDES AMERICANUS, _American Three-toed Woodpecker_.
+ Very similar to preceding species, but with narrow bars of white
+ forming an _interrupted stripe down the back_; head thickly
+ sprinkled with white in both sexes and a white line on nape or
+ just below; a _white line_, too narrow to be called a stripe,
+ down side of throat.[M] with _crown bright yellow_.
+ 9 inches. Same range in the East as last; replaced in West by
+ following subspecies:--
+
+ a. _P. a. alascensis_, _Alaskan Three-toed Woodpecker_.
+ Smaller; more white; nape very white; more white on top
+ of head.
+ Alaska, south to 48°. (Mt. Baker, Washington).
+
+ b. _P. a. dorsalis_, _Alpine Three-toed Woodpecker_.
+ More white on back and head than _P. americanus_, less than
+ _alascensis_; but continuous, not barred. "Iris dark cherry-red"
+ (Mearns).
+ Rocky Mountain region, south to New Mexico and Arizona.
+
+ 11. SPHYRAPICUS VARIUS, _Yellow-bellied Sapsucker_.
+ Under parts whitish or pale sulphur yellow; upper parts black,
+ mottled with pure or yellowish white; _rump white_; wings
+ spotted, and with conspicuous white coverts; tail black with
+ _outer webs of outer feathers_ and _inner webs of middle
+ feathers light colored_; sides streaked; breast with a _broad
+ black patch_ extending in a "chin-strap" to the corners of the
+ mouth; sides of the head striped. Occiput black, nape white.
+ [M] with forehead, crown, chin, and throat crimson;
+ [F] usually with crown crimson, forehead black,
+ and throat white, back more brownish; [F]
+ sometimes, and young always, with crown blackish. 7.5-8.5
+ inches.
+
+ Colors vary much with age, sex, and season; the wing bar
+ and yellowish tinge are good marks for all plumages; the
+ rump and breast patch for adult birds.
+ Eastern North America, breeding from Massachusetts
+ northward, migrating in winter to the Southern States.
+
+ a. _S. v. nuchalis_, _Red-naped Sapsucker_.
+ Similar, but an additional red stripe on nape, and the black
+ chin-strap replaced by crimson. 8-8.5 inches.
+ Rocky Mountains to Coast Range, replacing the above in
+ the mountains; usually breeding at from 5000 to 10,000
+ feet elevation.
+
+ 12. SPHYRAPICUS RUBER, _Red-breasted Sapsucker_.
+ Body and under parts similar to _S. varius_, but back much
+ less variegated with white. No black on breast, no white
+ stripe through eyes. Nasal tufts brownish instead of white.
+ _Head_, _neck_, and _breast uniform crimson_. _Sexes alike._ Young
+ with crimson replaced by gray or "claret brown" (Bendire).
+ 8.5-9 inches.
+ Pacific coast, Sierra Nevada, and on both sides of Cascade
+ Mountains; a summer resident only north of northern
+ California.
+ At first sight the Red-breasted Sapsucker might be mistaken
+ for the Red-headed Woodpecker, but the two birds
+ do not inhabit the same country.
+
+ 13. SPHYRAPICUS THYROIDEUS, _Williamson's Sapsucker_.
+
+ Sexes totally dissimilar except in having a white rump and
+ yellow under parts. _Male, glossy black all over except_
+ conspicuous _white rump_ and _white wing coverts_, two white
+ stripes on sides of head, white nasal tufts, white spots on
+ primaries; sides and tail coverts mottled; a stripe of scarlet
+ down middle of throat and _brilliant yellow under parts_.
+ _Female, light brown_; head clear brown; body, wings, and tail
+ closely _barred_ with black and white; no white wing coverts;
+ rarely a red throat like male; usually but not always a large
+ black patch on breast, and always a _yellow belly_ and _white
+ rump_. Young males lack the red on the throat and usually the
+ yellow on the belly; the black is dull, and the throat a dingy
+ white. Young females lack the yellow on the belly and the black
+ on breast, and are dull-colored and indistinctly marked. 9-9.5
+ inches.
+
+ Rocky Mountain region, west to Sierra Nevada, Cascades
+ and northern Coast Ranges, breeding at from 5000
+ to 9000 feet elevation. The handsomest of our woodpeckers.
+
+ 14. CEOPHLOEUS PILEATUS, _Pileated Woodpecker, Logcock_.
+ Body blackish slate; wings with a large white patch conspicuous
+ only when flying; throat white; a white stripe
+ across cheek and down neck; jaw-stripe scarlet in male,
+ blackish in female; both sexes with scarlet crest, but in the
+ male the whole top of head (which is slaty black in female)
+ equally brilliant. This red cap gives the bird the name of
+ _pileated_. Iris yellow. 17 inches.
+ Wooded regions of Southern States, Florida to North
+ Carolina, very rarely near settlements, but far more common
+ than the following subspecies of the North and
+ West.
+
+ a. _C. p. abieticola_, _Northern Pileated Woodpecker_.
+ Larger; more extensive white markings; the black grayer
+ or browner.
+ From Virginia northward to 63° in the East, and in the
+ West among the Rocky Mountains, north of Colorado, to
+ the northwest coast; a shy woodland bird to be looked
+ for only in the primitive evergreen forests, though sometimes
+ occurring in any heavy timber and, in New England,
+ upon the higher well-wooded mountains. The
+ largest of the northern woodpeckers; resident.
+
+ 15. _Melanerpes erythrocephalus_, _Red-headed Woodpecker_.
+ Wings, tail, and upper parts glossy blue-black; rump, exposed
+ secondaries, and under parts from breast downward
+ pure white; _head_, _neck_, and _breast crimson._ _Sexes alike._
+ Young with red and black wholly or partly replaced by
+ grayish brown; can be recognized by white markings. 9.5
+ inches.
+ United States, west to Rocky Mountains; rare east of
+ Hudson River, but ordinarily breeding wherever found;
+ in winter usually migratory from its northern limits, the
+ migration depending principally upon the food supply
+ and depth of snow.
+
+ 16. MELANERPES FORMICIVORUS, _Ant-eating Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts, wings, and tail glossy greenish black; _rump_
+ and lower parts _white_; white patch on primaries, conspicuous
+ in flight; upper throat and line about the bill dull
+ black; _forehead_ with _wide white band_; lower _throat sulphur
+ yellow_; breast and sides thickly streaked with black and
+ white. [M] with crown and occiput crimson;
+ [F] with crown black, occiput crimson.
+ Iris white. 7-9 inches.
+ Mexico; western Texas.
+
+ a. _M. f. angustifrons_, _Narrow-fronted Woodpecker_.
+ Similar, but with a _narrow band of white_ across the _forehead_;
+ breast and sides not so thickly streaked.
+ Lower California, never occurring within the borders of
+ the United States.
+
+ b. _M. f. bairdi_, _Californian Woodpecker_, _El Carpintero_.
+ Similar to _M. formicivorus_, but the breast black, little
+ streaked with white except along the sides; yellow of throat
+ paler, or replaced by white. Iris white. Larger, 7.5-9.5
+ inches.
+ Pacific coast, north into Oregon to 44°, east to southern
+ New Mexico and Texas in the south and to the eastern
+ slopes of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Mountains in
+ the north, but more abundant, on the western than on the
+ eastern slopes of these mountains.
+
+ 17. MELANERPES TORQUATUS, _Lewis's Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts, wings, and tail glossy greenish black; under
+ parts _pinkish red_; chest and _collar round hind neck hoary
+ gray_; crown and sides of head black; forehead, cheeks, and
+ chin crimson. _Sexes alike._ Young with pink replaced by
+ grayish. 10.5-11.5 inches.
+ Pacific coast, east to Black Hills and Rocky Mountains
+ between Arizona and 49th parallel; casual still farther
+ east; migratory in its northern ranges; a silent, heavy
+ flying bird, different in habits and appearance from the
+ other woodpeckers; often seen flycatching.
+
+ 18. MELANERPES CAROLINUS, _Red-bellied Woodpecker_, _Zebra Bird_.
+ Back and wings black, _barred with white_; under and upper
+ tail coverts, middle and outer tail feathers, white varied with
+ black; head and under parts ashy; _belly tinged with reddish_.
+ [M] with whole top of head and nape bright red;
+ [F] with forehead and nape red, crown gray. 9-10
+ inches.
+ Eastern and Southern States between the Hudson River
+ and the Rocky Mountains, north to southern New York,
+ Ohio, southern Michigan, etc.; migratory in its northern
+ ranges.
+
+ 19. MELANERPES AURIFRONS, _Golden-fronted Woodpecker_.
+ Back and wings barred with black and white; rump white; entire
+ under parts brownish white, unspotted (except under tail
+ coverts); primaries unspotted, except at tip; tail black with
+ slightly barred outer feathers; _belly yellowish; forehead and
+ hind neck orange in both sexes_. [M] with _crown
+ red_ set in a larger patch of clear gray; [F]
+ with crown clear gray. 9.5 inches.
+ Central and southern Texas, north to about 33°; breeds
+ wherever found.
+
+ 20. MELANERPES UROPYGIALIS, _Gila Woodpecker_.
+ Back and wings barred with black and white; _head and
+ lower parts smoky brown_; rump black and white; tail barred
+ on inner and outer feathers; primaries unspotted; belly yellow
+ (not conspicuous). [M] with red crown surrounded by
+ brownish; "iris red" (Hayden). 9 inches.
+ Southwestern New Mexico and Arizona to southeastern
+ California, usually above 2000 feet altitude; its distribution
+ depending principally upon the giant cactus.
+
+ 21. COLAPTES AURATUS, _Flicker_, _Yellow-hammer_, _High-hole_,
+ _Clape_.
+ Back and wings (except primaries) brownish gray, barred with
+ black; under parts pale vinaceous spotted with black spots from
+ breast downward; _rump white; tail and wings golden yellow
+ beneath_, dark above, showing the yellow shafts; tail feathers
+ with black tips below; top of head ashy gray, sides of head and
+ throat vinaceous; a broad _black crescent_ across breast, a
+ bright scarlet one on nape. [M] _with black jaw
+ patches_; [F] without them. 12 inches.
+ South Atlantic and Gulf region, north to North Carolina.
+
+ a. _C. a. luteus_, _Northern Flicker_.
+ Larger; paler; black bars above narrower; less black and
+ white below.
+ North from North Carolina and west to the Rocky Mountains;
+ casual farther west; migratory from its northern
+ ranges.
+
+ 22. COLAPTES CAFER, _Red-shafted Flicker_.
+ Color pattern similar to above with the following differences:
+ _wings and tail red beneath_ instead of yellow; throat ashy
+ gray; usually no red on occiput (though some specimens show a
+ narrow crescent). [M] _with red jaw patches_.
+ 12.5-14 inches.
+ Rocky Mountain region west to Pacific coast from
+ Mexico to British Columbia, except northwest coast
+ region of Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia,
+ and occasionally east to Kansas and Nebraska; resident
+ except in the more northern portions of its range.
+
+ a. _C. c. saturatior_, _Northwestern Flicker_.
+ Darker; smaller; narrower breast crescent.
+ Northwest coast, replacing the above, from which it cannot
+ be separated in life.
+
+ 23. COLAPTES CHRYSOIDES, _Gilded Flicker_; _Cactus Flicker_.
+ Color pattern same as _C. auratus_, but throat gray; top of head
+ brown; _occiput without band_; tail band broader and yellow
+ paler than in _C. auratus_. [M] with _jaw patches
+ bright red_; "iris blood red" (Hayden).
+ Central and southern Arizona and Lower California.
+
+ a. _C. c. brunescens_, _Brown Flicker_.
+ A curious subspecies of the last, smaller, with larger,
+ more numerous spots and a smoky brown cast of plumage;
+ black tail band very wide; jaw patches red; wings and tail
+ yellow beneath.
+ Lower (not southern) California; casual only in southern
+ California; in Arizona to 35°.
+
+ 24. COLAPTES RUFIPILEUS, _Guadalupe Island Flicker_.
+ Coloration like _C. cafer_, crown decidedly brown; crescent
+ on nape wanting; jaw patches red; wings and tail _red_ beneath.
+ Guadalupe Island off the coast of Lower California.
+
+
+
+
+INDEX
+
+
+ Aard-vark, 104.
+
+ Acorns, eaten by woodpeckers, 46, 51, 57, 58, 59.
+
+ Acquired habits, 61-66.
+
+ Adaptations of woodpeckers to environment,104-109.
+
+ Ant-bear, 104, 106.
+
+ Ants, as food for woodpeckers, 3, 30, 63, 105, 106.
+
+ Argument from design, 110.
+
+
+ Bear, black, 107.
+
+ Beechnuts, as food for woodpeckers, 57, 58, 59.
+
+ Beetles, as food for woodpeckers, 3, 11, 63.
+
+ Bill of woodpeckers as a tool, 68-76.
+
+ Borers, 3, 10, 11, 29, 30, 36.
+
+ Burroughs, John, quoted, 17.
+
+
+ Cacti, woodpeckers nesting in, 20.
+
+ Cannibalism among woodpeckers, 64.
+
+ Carpenter, the. _See_ California woodpecker.
+
+ Carpintero, El. _See_ California woodpecker.
+
+ Caterpillars, as food for woodpeckers, 10, 11, 29, 63.
+
+ Cecropia chrysalids, eaten by woodpeckers, 9.
+
+ Chestnuts, eaten by woodpeckers, 59.
+
+ Chickadee, 16, 21, 25, 30, 32, 74.
+
+ Chipmunks, hoarding food, 60.
+
+ Clape. _See_ Flicker.
+
+ Creeper, brown, 5, 81, 87, 88.
+
+ Crossbills, eating salted food, 31.
+
+ Crow, hoarding habit, 60; 74.
+
+ Cuckoo, ground, 82.
+
+ Cuckoos, yoke-toed, 5, 82.
+
+
+ Drumming of yellow-bellied sapsucker, 16, 17.
+
+
+ Evolution, 109, 112.
+
+
+ Feeding young, how the flicker does it, 24, 25.
+
+ Fence-posts used by woodpeckers, 48, 56, 58.
+
+ Finch, purple, 39.
+
+ Finches, 74.
+
+ Fish-spears, 12, 13.
+
+ Flicker, 6, 7, 15, 18, 20, 23-26, 73, 74, 82, 88, 89, 95, 97-99,
+ 101, 103, 106, 125.
+ brown, 126.
+ cactus, 126.
+ gilded, 126.
+ Guadalupe Island, 127.
+ northern, 126.
+ northwestern, 126.
+ red-shafted, 126.
+
+ Flycatching habits of woodpeckers, 7, 56, 106, 124.
+
+ Foot, of a four-toed woodpecker figured, 77.
+ of a three-toed woodpecker figured, 80.
+ discussed as a tool, 77-85.
+
+
+ Grasshoppers, as food for woodpeckers, 3, 56, 63.
+
+ Grosbeaks, pine, 39.
+
+ Grouse, ruffed, 14, 15.
+
+ Grouse, sharp-tailed, 15.
+
+
+ Hawk, sparrow, 21.
+
+ High-hole. _See_ Flicker.
+
+ Hoarding habits, 62, 63.
+
+ Hummingbird, Anna's, 27.
+
+ Hummingbirds, 25, 103.
+
+ Hyoid bones, 100-103.
+
+
+ Jay, blue, hoarding habit, 53, 60.
+
+
+ Kinglets, 5.
+
+
+ Lightning rods attracting woodpeckers, 18.
+
+ Logcock. _See_ Woodpecker, pileated.
+
+
+ Maple, rock and red, sugar made from, 36.
+
+ Maize, eaten by English sparrows, 62, 65.
+
+ Mandibles of woodpeckers, 13, 101.
+
+ Martin, sand, 20.
+
+ Mice, hoarding habit, 60.
+
+ Migration, dependent upon food supply, 63.
+
+ Mountain-ash trees, sought by woodpeckers, 38.
+
+
+ Nesting of woodpeckers, 20-23.
+
+ Nests, in unusual places, 20.
+
+ North America, ornithologically defined, 114.
+
+ Nuthatches, 5, 21, 30, 81.
+
+
+ Oaks, used by Californian woodpecker for storing nuts, 48, 49.
+
+ Oranges, eaten by woodpeckers, 65, 66.
+
+ Owls, 15, 21, 80.
+
+
+ Pangolin, as an ant-eater, 104.
+
+ Parrot, 13, 82.
+
+ Parroquet, Carolina, 5.
+
+ Pigeon, domestic, 27.
+
+ Pines, acorns stored in, 49.
+
+ "Ploughshare," anchylosed vertebræ of tail, 86.
+
+
+ Ravens, 74.
+
+ Reason in woodpeckers' hoarding, 62.
+
+ Red-head. _See_ Woodpecker, red-headed.
+
+ Robins, 39.
+
+
+ Sap, not used as an insect-lure, 41.
+ how its loss harms the tree, 44, 45.
+
+ Sapsucker, orange, 65. _See, also_, Woodpecker, red-bellied.
+ red-breasted, 122.
+ red-naped, 121.
+ Williamson's, 122.
+ yellow-bellied, 7, 15-17, 33-45, 59, 102, 103, 105, 106.
+
+ Skull of woodpecker figured, 101.
+
+ Sparrow, English _or_ house, 21, 62, 65.
+
+ Spears, 12, 13.
+
+ Spruce, acorns stored in, 47, 49, 53.
+
+ Squirrels, thievishness of, 23, 53.
+
+ Subspecies defined, 114.
+
+ Swallow, eaves _or_ cliff, 61, 64, 65.
+
+ Swallow, tree, 21.
+
+ Swift, chimney, 5, 20, 61, 87, 88.
+
+
+ Tail, shape, 89.
+ number of rectrices, 95.
+ experimental demonstration of shape _a priori_, 91.
+ reason for shape, 98.
+
+ Tail-feathers studied, 94-97.
+
+ Taste in the woodpeckers, 38, 39.
+
+ Telegraph poles resorted to by woodpeckers, 7, 18, 48.
+
+ Thumb, of birds, 80.
+
+ Tin roofs resorted to by woodpeckers, 17, 55.
+
+ Titmouse, crested, 21.
+
+ Toes, numbering of, 79, 80.
+
+ Tongue, appearance of, 99.
+ figured, 99.
+ bones of, 13, 100-103.
+
+ Trogons, yoke-toed, 82.
+
+
+ Vanessa butterfly, 16.
+
+ Vegetable food of woodpeckers, 3, 31.
+
+ Vireos, 30.
+
+
+ Warblers, 30.
+
+ Weevils, not the object in storing nuts, 52.
+
+ Woodpecker, Alaskan three-toed, 121.
+ alpine three-toed, 121.
+ American three-toed, 121.
+ ant-eating, 123.
+ arctic three-toed, 120.
+ Arizona, 120.
+ Batchelder's, 118.
+ black-breasted, 6. _See, also_, Williamson's sapsucker.
+ Cabanis's, 118.
+ Californian, 46-54, 56, 66.
+ downy, 6, 17, 21, 28-33, 59, 63, 70, 74, 83, 86, 88, 95, 107,
+ 114, 118.
+ Gairdner's, 118.
+ Gila, 55, 125.
+ golden-fronted, 55, 102, 125.
+ hairy, 6, 9, 28, 32, 59, 63, 74, 83, 86, 88, 89, 95, 97-99, 107,
+ 114, 117.
+ Harris's, 118.
+ ivory-billed, 70, 71, 73, 83, 88, 89, 93, 97, 98, 107, 117.
+ ladder-backed, 119.
+ Lewis's, 6, 13, 55, 59, 66, 103, 124.
+ narrow-fronted, 124.
+ Nelson's downy, 119.
+ northern hairy, 118.
+ northern pileated, 123.
+ Nuttall's, 119.
+ pileated, 6, 71, 73, 83, 88, 93, 95, 98, 99, 107, 123.
+ red-bellied, 6, 55, 65, 124.
+ red-cockaded, 119.
+ red-headed, 6, 7, 11, 55-58, 60-64, 105, 123.
+ Rocky Mountain, 118.
+ St. Lucas, 119.
+ southern downy, 118.
+ southern hairy, 118.
+ Texan, 119.
+ three-toed, foot figured, 80.
+ white-headed, 120.
+
+ Woodpeckers, advantages of, as subject for study, 2.
+ bill as a tool, 69-73.
+ carpenters or miners, 68.
+ character of, 7, 8.
+ coloration of, 5.
+ coloration of sexes, 6.
+ covered nostrils, 74, 75.
+ favorite haunts, 3, 7.
+ foot, structure and uses, 77.
+ habit of drumming, 17.
+ how to recognize the woodpeckers, 4.
+ inferences from study of bills, 75.
+ hunting borers, 10, 11.
+ nesting, 21, 22.
+ preferred foods, 3, 7.
+ tail, study of, 86-99.
+ winter quarters, 22.
+ wooing, 15.
+
+
+ Yoke-toed feet, 82.
+
+
+ Zebra bird. _See_ Woodpecker, red-bellied.
+
+
+
+
+ The Riverside Press
+
+ _Electrotyped and printed by H. O. Houghton & Co.
+ Cambridge, Mass, U. S. A._
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+
+
+Transcribers Notes
+
+Pickaxe and pick-axe both used in the text
+Various punctuation and other printing errors corrected
+Inconsistent hyphenation of words regularised
+Spelling of reëcho (page 16) left intact
+Male symbol shown as [M] Female symbol shown as [F]
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's The Woodpeckers, by Fannie Hardy Eckstorm
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WOODPECKERS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 35062-8.txt or 35062-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/5/0/6/35062/
+
+Produced by Bryan Ness, Steve Read and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/35062-8.zip b/35062-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1e658ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-8.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h.zip b/35062-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ba9c7db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/35062-h.htm b/35062-h/35062-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca3114e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/35062-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,4869 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Woodpeckers, by Fannie Hardy Eckstorm.
+ </title>
+ <style type="text/css">
+
+ p { margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+ }
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+ }
+ hr { width: 65%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+ }
+ img { width: 70% ; }
+ .widetiny { width: 10% ; }
+ .wide0 { width: 20% ; }
+ .wide1 { width: 40% ; }
+ .wide2 { width: 55% ; }
+
+ table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;}
+
+ body{margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+ }
+
+ .pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */
+ /* visibility: hidden; */
+ position: absolute;
+ left: 92%;
+ font-size: smaller;
+ text-align: right;
+ } /* page numbers */
+
+ .blockquot{margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 10%;}
+
+ .center {text-align: center;}
+ .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;}
+
+ .caption {font-weight: bold;}
+
+ .figcenter {margin: auto; text-align: center;}
+
+ .footnote {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-size: 0.9em;}
+ .footnote .label {position: absolute; right: 84%; text-align: right;}
+ .fnanchor {vertical-align: super; font-size: .8em; text-decoration: none;}
+
+ dl { margin-bottom:0em; }
+ dd { margin-left:2em; text-align:justify; }
+ dd.range { margin-left:3em; }
+ dl.species dt { margin-top:1em; }
+ dl.subsp { margin-top:0em; }
+ dl.subsp dt { margin-left:1em; margin-top:0em; }
+ dl.key dt { margin-right:1em; text-align:right; }
+ dd.t0 { margin-left:3em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t1 { margin-left:4.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t2 { margin-left:5.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t3 { margin-left:6.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t4 { margin-left:7.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t5 { margin-left:8.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t6 { margin-left:9.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t7 { margin-left:10.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t8 { margin-left:11.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t9 { margin-left:12.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ dd.t10 { margin-left:13.5em; text-indent:-3em; }
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Woodpeckers, by Fannie Hardy Eckstorm
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Woodpeckers
+
+Author: Fannie Hardy Eckstorm
+
+Release Date: January 25, 2011 [EBook #35062]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WOODPECKERS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Bryan Ness, Steve Read and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/cover.jpg" alt="cover" title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">cover</span>
+</div>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_i" id="Page_i">[i]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/frontispiece.jpg" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ii" id="Page_ii">[ii]</a></span></p>
+
+<h1>THE WOODPECKERS</h1>
+
+<h3>BY</h3>
+
+<h2>FANNIE HARDY ECKSTORM</h2>
+
+<h4>WITH ILLUSTRATIONS</h4>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/t_page.jpg" class="wide0" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+<div class="center">
+BOSTON AND NEW YORK
+<br />HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY
+<br />The Riverside Press, Cambridge
+<br />1901
+</div>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_iii" id="Page_iii">[iii]</a></span>
+</p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h4>COPYRIGHT, 1900, BY FANNIE HARDY ECKSTORM</h4>
+
+<h4>ALL RIGHTS RESERVED</h4>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_iv" id="Page_iv">[iv]</a></span></p>
+
+<h4><i>To</i><br />
+MY FATHER<br />
+MR. MANLY HARDY<br />
+<i>A Lifelong Naturalist</i><br />
+</h4>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v"> </a></span></p>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[vi]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>CONTENTS</h2>
+
+<div class="center">
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align="left"><small>CHAP.</small></td><td align="left"> </td><td align="left"><small>PAGE</small></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left"> </td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">Foreword: the Riddlers</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">I.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">How to know a Woodpecker</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_4">4</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">II.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">How the Woodpecker catches a Grub</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_9">9</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">III.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">How the Woodpecker courts his Mate</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_15">15</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">IV.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">How the Woodpecker makes a House</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_20">20</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">V.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">How a Flicker feeds her Young</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_24">24</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">VI.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">Friend Downy</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_28">28</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">VII.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">Persona non Grata. (Yellow-bellied Sapsucker)</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_33">33</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">VIII.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">El Carpintero. (Californian Woodpecker)</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_46">46</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">IX.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">A Red-headed Cousin. (Red-headed Woodpecker)</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_55">55</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">X.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">A Study of Acquired Habits</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_60">60</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">XI.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">The Woodpecker&rsquo;s Tools: His Bill</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_68">68</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">XII.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">The Woodpecker&rsquo;s Tools: His Foot</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_77">77</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">XIII.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">The Woodpecker&rsquo;s Tools: His Tail</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_86">86</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">XIV.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">The Woodpecker&rsquo;s Tools: His Tongue</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_99">99</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">XV.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">How each Woodpecker is fitted for his own Kind of Life</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_104">104</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">XVI.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">The Argument from Design</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_110">110</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left" colspan="2">APPENDIX</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_113">113</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">A.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">Key to the Woodpeckers of North America</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_114">114</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="right">B.</td><td align="left"><span class="smcap">Descriptions of the Woodpeckers of North America</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_117">117</a></td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii"> </a></span></p>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[viii]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr />
+<h2><a name="LIST_OF_ILLUSTRATIONS" id="LIST_OF_ILLUSTRATIONS"></a>LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS</h2>
+
+<div class="center">
+<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" summary="">
+<tr><td align="left"> </td><td align="right">PAGE</td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Flicker (colored)</td><td align="left"><i>Frontispiece</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Boring Larva</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_10">10</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Indian Spear</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_12">12</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Solomon Islander&rsquo;s Spear</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_13">13</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Downy Woodpecker (colored)</td><td align="right"><i>facing </i><a href="#Page_28">28</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Bark showing Work of Sapsucker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_34">34</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Yellow-bellied Sapsucker (colored)</td><td align="right"><i>facing </i><a href="#Page_34">34</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Trunk of Tree showing Work of Californian Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_47">47</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Californian Woodpecker (colored)</td><td align="right"><i>facing </i><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Red-headed Woodpecker (colored)</td><td align="right"><i>facing </i><a href="#Page_56">56</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Head of the Lewis&rsquo;s Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_59">59</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Head of Ivory-billed Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_70">70</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Foot of Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_77">77</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Diagram of Right Foot</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_79">79</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Foot of Three-toed Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_80">80</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Tail of Hairy Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_86">86</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Tails of Brown Creeper and Chimney Swift</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_87">87</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Middle Tail Feathers of Flicker, Ivory-billed Woodpecker, and
+Hairy Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_89">89</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Diagram of Curvature of Tails of Woodpeckers</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_90">90</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Patterns of Tails</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_91">91</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Under Side of Middle Tail Feather of Ivory-billed Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_97">97</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Tongue of Hairy Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_99">99</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Tongue-bones of Flicker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_100">100</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Skull of Woodpecker, showing Bones of Tongue</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Hyoids of Sapsucker and Golden-fronted Woodpecker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_102">102</a></td></tr>
+<tr><td align="left">Diagram of Head of a Flicker</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_113">113</a></td></tr>
+</table></div>
+
+<p><i>The colored illustrations are by Louis Agassiz Fuertes. The text
+cuts are from drawings by John L. Ridgway.</i><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix"> </a></span></p>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[1]</a></span></p>
+
+<hr />
+<h2>THE WOODPECKERS</h2>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>FOREWORD: THE RIDDLERS</h2>
+
+
+<p>Long ago in Greece, the legend runs, a terrible
+monster called the Sphinx used to waylay
+travelers to ask them riddles: whoever could not
+answer these she killed, but the man who did
+answer them killed her and made an end of her
+riddling.</p>
+
+<p>To-day there is no Sphinx to fear, yet the
+world is full of unguessed riddles. No thoughtful
+man can go far afield but some bird or
+flower or stone bars his way with a question
+demanding an answer; and though many men
+have been diligently spelling out the answers
+for many years, and we for the most part must
+study the answers they have proved, and must
+reply in their words, yet those shrewd old riddlers,
+the birds and flowers and bees, are always
+ready for a new victim, putting their heads together
+over some new enigma to bar the road
+to knowledge till that, too, shall be answered;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[2]</a></span>
+so that other men&rsquo;s learning does not always
+suffice. So much of a man&rsquo;s pleasure in life, so
+much of his power, depends on his ability to
+silence these persistent questioners, that this little
+book was written with the hope of making
+clearer the kind of questions Dame Nature asks,
+and the way to get correct answers.</p>
+
+<p>This is purposely a <i>little</i> book, dealing only
+with a single group of birds, treating particularly
+only some of the commoner species of that
+group, taking up only a few of the problems
+that present themselves to the naturalist for solution,
+and aiming rather to make the reader
+<i>acquainted with</i> the birds than <i>learned about</i>
+them.</p>
+
+<p>The woodpeckers were selected in preference
+to any other family because they are patient
+under observation, easily identified, resident in
+all parts of the country both in summer and in
+winter, and because more than any other birds
+they leave behind them records of their work
+which may be studied after the birds have
+flown. The book provides ample means for identifying
+every species and subspecies of woodpecker
+known in North America, though only
+five of the commonest and most interesting
+species have been selected for special study.
+At least three of these five should be found in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[3]</a></span>
+almost every part of the country. The Californian
+woodpecker is never seen in the East, nor
+the red-headed in the far West, but the downy
+and the hairy are resident nearly everywhere,
+and some species of the flickers and sapsuckers,
+if not always the ones chosen for special notice,
+are visitors in most localities.</p>
+
+<p>Look for the woodpeckers in orchards and
+along the edges of thickets, among tangles of
+wild grapes and in patches of low, wild berries,
+upon which they often feed, among dead trees
+and in the track of forest fires. Wherever there
+are boring larv&aelig;, beetles, ants, grasshoppers, the
+fruit of poison-ivy, dogwood, june-berry, wild
+cherry or wild grapes, woodpeckers may be confidently
+looked for if there are any in the neighborhood.
+Be patient, persistent, wide-awake, sure
+that you see what you think you see, careful to
+remember what you have seen, studious to compare
+your observations, and keen to hear the
+questions propounded you. If you do this seven
+years and a day, you will earn the name of Naturalist;
+and if you travel the road of the naturalist
+with curious patience, you may some day become
+as famous a riddle-reader as was that OEdipus, the
+king of Thebes, who slew the Sphinx.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[4]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>I</h2>
+
+<h3>HOW TO KNOW A WOODPECKER</h3>
+
+
+<p>The woodpecker is the easiest of all birds to
+recognize. Even if entirely new to you, you may
+readily decide whether a bird is a woodpecker or
+not.</p>
+
+<p>The woodpecker is always striking and is
+often gay in color. He is usually noisy, and his
+note is clear and characteristic. His shape and
+habits are peculiar, so that whenever you see a
+bird clinging to the side of a tree &ldquo;as if he had
+been thrown at it and stuck,&rdquo; you may safely
+call him a woodpecker. Not that all birds which
+cling to the bark of trees are woodpeckers,&mdash;for
+the chickadees, the crested titmice, the nuthatches,
+the brown creepers, and a few others
+like the kinglets and some wrens and wood-warblers
+more or less habitually climb up and down
+the tree-trunks; but these do it with a pretty
+grace wholly unlike the woodpecker&rsquo;s awkward,
+cling-fast way of holding on. As the largest of
+these is smaller than the smallest woodpecker,
+and as none of them (excepting only the tiny<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[5]</a></span>
+kinglets) ever shows the patch of yellow or scarlet
+which always marks the head of the male
+woodpecker, and which sometimes adorns his
+mate, there is no danger of making mistakes.</p>
+
+<p>The nuthatches are the only birds likely to
+be confused with woodpeckers, and these have
+the peculiar habit of traveling down a tree-trunk
+with their heads pointing to the ground. A
+woodpecker never does this; he may move down
+the trunk of the tree he is working on, but he
+will do it by hopping backward. A still surer
+sign of the woodpecker is the way he sits upon
+his tail, using it to brace him. No other birds
+except the chimney swift and the little brown
+creeper ever do this. A sure mark, also, is his
+feet, which have two toes turned forward and
+two turned backward. We find this arrangement
+in no other North American birds except
+the cuckoos and our one native parroquet. However,
+there is one small group of woodpeckers
+which have but three toes, and these are the only
+North American land-birds that do not have four
+well-developed toes.</p>
+
+<p>In coloration the woodpeckers show a strong
+family likeness. Except in some young birds,
+the color is always brilliant and often is gaudy.
+Usually it shows much clear black and white,
+with dashes of scarlet or yellow about the head.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[6]</a></span>
+Sometimes the colors are &ldquo;solid,&rdquo; as in the red-headed
+woodpecker; sometimes they lie in close
+bars, as in the red-bellied species; sometimes in
+spots and stripes, as in the downy and hairy;
+but there is always a <i>contrast</i>, never any blending
+of hues. The red or yellow is laid on in
+well-defined patches&mdash;square, oblong, or crescentic&mdash;upon
+the crown, the nape, the jaws, or
+the throat; or else in stripes or streaks down
+the sides of the head and neck, as in the logcock,
+or pileated woodpecker.</p>
+
+<p>There is no rule about the color markings of
+the sexes, as in some families of birds. Usually
+the female lacks all the bright markings of the
+male; sometimes, as in the logcock, she has them
+but in more restricted areas; sometimes, as in
+the flickers, she has all but one of the male&rsquo;s
+color patches; and in a few species, as the red-headed
+and Lewis&rsquo;s woodpeckers, the two sexes
+are precisely alike in color. In the black-breasted
+woodpecker, sometimes called Williamson&rsquo;s
+sapsucker, the male and female are so
+totally different that they were long described
+and named as different birds. It sometimes
+happens that a young female will show the color
+marks of the male, but will retain them only the
+first year.</p>
+
+<p>Though the woodpeckers cling to the trunks<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[7]</a></span>
+of trees, they are not exclusively climbing birds.
+Some kinds, like the flickers, are quite as frequently
+found on the ground, wading in the
+grass like meadowlarks. Often we may frighten
+them from the tangled vines of the frost grape
+and the branches of wild cherry trees, or from
+clumps of poison-ivy, whither they come to eat
+the fruit. The red-headed woodpecker is fond
+of sitting on fence posts and telegraph poles;
+and both he and the flicker frequently alight on
+the roofs of barns and houses and go pecking
+and pattering over the shingles. The sapsuckers
+and several other kinds will perch on dead limbs,
+like a flycatcher, on the watch for insects; the
+flickers, and more rarely other kinds, will sit
+crosswise of a limb instead of crouching lengthwise
+of it, as is the custom with woodpeckers.</p>
+
+<p>All these points you will soon learn. You
+will become familiar with the form, the flight,
+and the calls of the different woodpeckers; you
+will learn not only to know them by name, but
+to understand their characters; they will become
+your acquaintances, and later on your friends.</p>
+
+<p>This heavy bird, with straight, chisel bill and
+sharp-pointed tail-feathers; with his short legs
+and wide, flapping wings, his unmusical but not
+disagreeable voice, and his heavy, undulating,
+business-like flight, is distinctly bourgeois, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[8]</a></span>
+type of a bird devoted to business and enjoying
+it. No other bird has so much work to do all
+the year round, and none performs his task with
+more energy and sense. The woodpecker makes
+no aristocratic pretensions, puts on none of the
+coy graces and affectations of the professional
+singer; even his gay clothes fit him less jauntily
+than they would another bird. He is artisan to
+the backbone,&mdash;a plain, hard-working, useful
+citizen, spending his life in hammering holes in
+anything that appears to need a hole in it. Yet
+he is neither morose nor unsocial. There is a
+vein of humor in him, a large reserve of mirth
+and jollity. We see little of it except in the
+spring, and then for a time all the laughter in
+him bubbles up; he becomes uproarious in his
+glee, and the melody which he cannot vent in
+song he works out in the channels of his trade,
+filling the woodland with loud and harmonious
+rappings. Above all other birds he is the friend
+of man, and deserves to have the freedom of the
+fields.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[9]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>II</h2>
+
+<h3>HOW THE WOODPECKER CATCHES A GRUB</h3>
+
+
+<p>Did you ever see a hairy woodpecker strolling
+about a tree for what he could pick up?</p>
+
+<p>There is a <i>whur-r-rp</i> of gay black and white
+wings and the flash of a scarlet topknot as, with
+a sharp cry, he dashes past you, strikes the
+limb solidly with both feet, and instantly sidles
+behind it, from which safe retreat he keeps a
+sharp black eye fixed upon your motions. If
+you make friends with him by keeping quiet, he
+will presently forgive you for being there and
+hop to your side of the limb, pursuing his ordinary
+work in the usual way, turning his head
+from side to side, inspecting every crevice, and
+picking up whatever looks appetizing. Any
+knot or little seam in the bark is twice scanned;
+in such places moths and beetles lay their eggs.
+Little cocoons are always dainty morsels, and
+large cocoons contain a feast. The butterfly-hunter
+who is hoping to hatch out some fine
+cecropia moths knows well that a large proportion
+of all the cocoons he discovers will be empty.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[10]</a></span>
+The hairy woodpecker has been there before him,
+and has torn the chrysalis out of its silken cradle.
+For this the farmer should thank him
+heartily, even if the butterfly-hunter does not,
+for the cecropia caterpillar is destructive.</p>
+
+<p>But sometimes, on the fair bark of a smooth
+limb, the woodpecker stops, listens, taps, and begins
+to drill. He works with haste and energy,
+laying open a deep hole. For what? An apple-tree
+borer was there cutting out the life of
+the tree. The farmer
+could see no sign of
+him; neither could
+the woodpecker, but
+he could hear the strong grub down in his little
+chamber gnawing to make it longer, or, frightened
+by the heavy footsteps on his roof, scrambling
+out of the way.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_001.jpg" alt="Boring larva." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Boring larva.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>It is easy to hear the borer at work in the
+tree. When a pine forest has been burned and
+the trees are dead but still standing, there will
+be such a crunching and grinding of borers eating
+the dead wood that it can be heard on all
+sides many yards away. Even a single borer
+can sometimes be heard distinctly by putting the
+ear to the tree. Sound travels much farther
+through solids than it does through air; notice
+how much farther you can hear a railroad train<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[11]</a></span>
+by the click of the rails than by the noise that
+comes on the air. Even our dull ears can detect
+the woodworm, but we cannot locate him.
+How, then, is the woodpecker to do what we
+cannot do?</p>
+
+<p>Doubtless experience teaches him much, but
+one observer suggests that the woodpecker places
+the grub by the sense of touch. He says he
+has seen the red-headed woodpecker drop his
+wings till they trailed along the branch, as if
+to determine where the vibrations in the wood
+were strongest, and thus to decide where the
+grub was boring. But no one else appears to
+have noticed that woodpeckers are in the habit
+of trailing their wings as they drill for grubs.
+It would be a capital study for one to attempt
+to discover whether the woodpecker locates his
+grub by feeling, or whether he does it by hearing
+alone. Only one should be sure he is looking
+for grubs and not for beetles&rsquo; eggs, nor for
+ants, nor for caterpillars. By the energy with
+which he drills, and the size of the hole left
+after he has found his tidbit, one can decide
+whether he was working for a borer.</p>
+
+<p>But when the borer has been located, he has
+yet to be captured. There are many kinds of
+borers. Some channel a groove just beneath the
+bark and are easily taken; but others tunnel<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[12]</a></span>
+deep into the wood. I measured such a hole
+the other day, and found it was more than eight
+inches long and larger than a lead-pencil, bored
+through solid rock-maple wood. The woodpecker
+must sink a hole at right angles to this
+channel and draw the big grub out through his
+small, rough-sided hole. You would be surprised,
+if you tried to do the same with a pair
+of nippers the size of the woodpecker&rsquo;s bill, to
+find how strong the borer is, how he can buckle
+and twist, how he braces himself against the
+walls of his house. Were your strength no
+greater than the woodpecker&rsquo;s, the task would
+be much harder. Indeed, a large grub would
+stand a good chance of getting away but for
+one thing, the woodpecker <i>spears</i> him, and
+thereby saves many a dinner for himself.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_002.jpg" alt="Indian spear." class="wide1" title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Indian spear.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>Here is a primitive Indian fish-spear, such as
+the Penobscots used. To the end of a long
+pole two wooden jaws are tied loosely enough to
+spring apart a little under pressure, and midway
+between them, firmly driven into the end of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[13]</a></span>
+pole, is a point of iron. When a fish
+was struck, the jaws sprung apart under
+the force of the blow, guiding the iron
+through the body of the fish, which was
+held securely in the hollow above, that
+just fitted around his sides, and by the
+point itself.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_003.jpg" class="widetiny" alt="Solomon Islander&#39;s spear." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Solomon Islander&#39;s spear.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>The tool with which the woodpecker
+fishes for a grub is very much the same.
+His mandibles correspond to the two movable
+jaws. They are knife-edged, and the
+lower fits exactly inside the upper, so that
+they give a very firm grip. In addition,
+the upper one is movable. All birds can
+move the upper mandible, because it is
+hinged to the skull. (Watch a parrot
+some day, if you do not believe it.) A
+medium-sized woodpecker, like the Lewis&rsquo;s,
+can elevate his upper mandible at least a
+quarter of an inch without opening his
+mouth at all. This enables him to draw
+his prey through a smaller hole than
+would be needed if he must open his
+jaws along their whole length. Between
+the mandibles is the sharp-pointed
+tongue, which can be thrust entirely through a
+grub, holding him impaled. Unlike the Indian&rsquo;s
+spear-point, the woodpecker&rsquo;s tongue is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[14]</a></span>
+barbed heavily on both sides, and it is extensile.
+As a tool it resembles the Solomon Islander&rsquo;s
+spear. A medium-sized woodpecker can dart his
+tongue out two inches or more beyond the tip of
+his bill. A New Bedford boy might tell us, and
+very correctly, that the woodpecker <i>harpoons</i>
+his grub, just as a whaleman harpoons a whale.
+If the grub tries to back off into his burrow,
+out darts the long, barbed tongue and spears
+him. Then it drags him along the crooked
+tunnel and into the narrow shaft picked by the
+woodpecker, where the strong jaws seize and
+hold him firmly.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[15]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>III</h2>
+
+<h3>HOW THE WOODPECKER COURTS HIS MATE</h3>
+
+
+<p>Other birds woo their mates with songs, but
+the woodpecker has no voice for singing. He cannot
+pour out his soul in melody and tell his love
+his devotion in music. How do songless birds
+express their emotions? Some by grotesque actions
+and oglings, as the horned owl, and some
+by frantic dances, as the sharp-tailed grouse,
+woo and win their mates; but the amorous
+woodpecker, not excepting the flickers, which
+also woo by gestures, whacks a piece of seasoned
+timber, and rattles off interminable messages
+according to the signal code set down for
+woodpeckers&rsquo; love affairs. He is the only instrumental
+performer among the birds; for the
+ruffed grouse, though he drums, has no drum.</p>
+
+<p>There is no cheerier spring sound, in our belated
+Northern season, than the quick, melodious
+rappings of the sapsucker from some dead ash
+limb high above the meadow. It is the best
+performance of its kind: he knows the capabilities
+of his instrument, and gets out of it all the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[16]</a></span>
+music there is in it. Most if not all woodpeckers
+drum occasionally, but drumming is the special
+accomplishment of the sapsucker. He is
+easily first. In Maine, where they are abundant,
+they make the woods in springtime resound
+with their continual rapping. Early in
+April, before the trees are green with leaf, or
+the pussy-willows have lost their silky plumpness,
+when the early round-leafed yellow violet
+is cuddling among the brown, dead leaves, I
+hear the yellow-bellied sapsucker along the
+borders of the trout stream that winds down
+between the mountains. The dead branch of
+an elm-tree is his favorite perch, and there, elevated
+high above all the lower growth, he sits
+rolling forth a flood of sound like the tremolo
+of a great organ. Now he plays staccato,&mdash;detached,
+clear notes; and now, accelerating his
+time, he dashes through a few bars of impetuous
+hammerings. The woods re&euml;cho with it;
+the mountains give it faintly back. Beneath
+him the ruffed grouse paces back and forth on
+his favorite mossy log before he raises the palpitating
+whirr of his drumming. A chickadee
+digging in a rotten limb pauses to spit out
+a mouthful of punky wood and the brown
+<i>Vanessa</i>, edged with yellow, first butterfly of
+the season, flutters by on rustling wings. So<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[17]</a></span>
+spring arrives in Maine, ushered in by the reveille
+of the sapsucker.</p>
+
+<p>So ambitious is the sapsucker of the excellence
+of his performance that no instrument but
+the best will satisfy him. He is always experimenting,
+and will change his anvil for another
+as soon as he discovers one of superior resonance.
+They say he tries the tin pails of the maple-sugar
+makers to see if these will not give him a
+clearer note; that he drums on tin roofs and
+waterspouts till he loosens the solder and they
+come tumbling down. But usually he finds nothing
+so near his liking as a hard-wood branch,
+dead and barkless, the drier, the harder, the
+thinner, the finer grained, so much the better
+for his uses.</p>
+
+<p>Deficient as they are in voice, the woodpeckers
+do not lack a musical ear. Mr. Burroughs
+tells us that a downy woodpecker of his acquaintance
+used to change his key by tapping on a
+knot an inch or two from his usual drumming
+place, thereby obtaining a higher note. Alternating
+between the two places, he gave to his
+music the charm of greater variety. The woodpeckers
+very quickly discover the superior conductivity
+of metals. In parts of the country
+where woodpeckers are more abundant than
+good drumming trees, a tin roof proves an<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[18]</a></span>
+almost irresistible attraction. A lightning-rod
+will sometimes draw them farther than it would
+an electric bolt; and a telegraph pole, with its
+tinkling glasses and ringing wires, gives them
+great satisfaction. If men did not put their
+singing poles in such public places, their music
+would be much more popular with the woodpeckers;
+but even now the birds often venture
+on the dangerous pastime and hammer you out a
+concord of sweet sounds from the mellow wood-notes,
+the clear peal of the glass, and the ringing
+overtones of the wires.</p>
+
+<p>The flicker often telegraphs his love by tapping
+either on a forest tree or on some loose
+board of a barn or outhouse; but he has other
+ways of courting his lady. On fine spring mornings,
+late in April, I have seen them on a horizontal
+bough, the lady sitting quietly while her
+lover tried to win her approval by strange antics.
+Quite often there are two males displaying their
+charms in open rivalry, but once I saw them
+when the field was clear. If fine clothes made
+a gentleman, this brave wooer would have been
+first in all the land: for his golden wings and
+tail showed their glittering under side as he
+spread them; his scarlet headdress glowed like
+fire; his rump was radiantly white, not to speak
+of the jetty black of his other ornaments and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[19]</a></span>
+the beautiful ground-colors of his body. He
+danced before his lady, showing her all these
+beauties, and perhaps boasting a little of his own
+good looks, though she was no less beautiful.
+He spread his wings and tail for her inspection;
+he bowed, to show his red crescent; he
+bridled, he stepped forward and back and sidewise
+with deep bows to his mistress, coaxing her
+with the mellowest and most enticing <i>co-wee-tucks</i>,
+which no doubt in his language meant
+&ldquo;Oh, promise me,&rdquo; laughing now and then his
+jovial <i>wick-a-wick-a-wick-a-wick-a</i>, either in glee
+or nervousness. It was all so very silly&mdash;and
+so very nice! I wonder how it all came out.
+Did she promise him? Or did she find a gayer
+suitor?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[20]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>IV</h2>
+
+<h3>HOW THE WOODPECKER MAKES A HOUSE</h3>
+
+
+<p>All woodpeckers make their houses in the
+wood of trees, either the trunk or one of the
+branches. Almost the only exceptions to this
+rule are those that live in the treeless countries
+of the West. In the torrid deserts of Arizona
+and the Southwest, some species are obliged to
+build in the thorny branches of giant cacti,
+which there grow to an enormous size. In the
+treeless plains to the northward, a few individuals,
+for lack of anything so suitable as the
+cactus, dig holes in clay banks, or even lay their
+eggs upon the surface of the prairie. In a country
+where chimney swallows nest in deserted
+houses, and sand martins burrow in the sides of
+wells, who wonders at the flicker&rsquo;s thinking that
+the side of a haystack, the hollow of a wheel-hub,
+or the cavity under an old ploughshare,
+is an ideal home? But in wooded countries
+the woodpeckers habitually nest in trees. The
+only exceptions I know are a few flickers&rsquo; holes
+in old posts, and a few instances where flickers<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[21]</a></span>
+have pecked through the weatherboarding of a
+house to nest in the space between the walls.</p>
+
+<p>But because a bird nests in a hole in a tree,
+it is not necessarily a woodpecker. The sparrow-hawk,
+the house sparrow, the tree swallow, the
+bluebird, most species of wrens, and several of
+the smaller species of owls nest either in natural
+cavities in trees or in deserted woodpeckers&rsquo; holes.
+The chickadees, the crested titmice, and the nuthatches
+dig their own holes after the same pattern
+as the woodpecker&rsquo;s. However, the large,
+round holes were all made by woodpeckers, and
+of those under two inches in diameter, our friend
+Downy made his full share. It is easy to tell
+who made the hole, for the different birds have
+different styles of housekeeping. The chickadees
+and nuthatches always build a soft little
+nest of grass, leaves, and feathers, while the
+woodpeckers lay their eggs on a bed of chips,
+and carry nothing in from outside.</p>
+
+<p>Soon after they have mated in the spring, the
+woodpeckers begin to talk of housekeeping.
+First, a tree must be chosen. It may be sound or
+partly decayed, one of a clump or solitary; but
+it is usually dead or hollow-hearted, and at least
+partly surrounded by other trees. Sometimes a
+limb is chosen, sometimes an upright trunk, and
+the nest may be from two feet to one hundred<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[22]</a></span>
+feet from the ground, though most frequently it
+will be found not less than ten nor more than
+thirty feet up. However odd the location finally
+occupied, it is likely that it was not the first one
+selected. A woodpecker will dig half a dozen
+houses rather than occupy an undesirable tenement.
+It is very common to find their unfinished
+holes and the wider-mouthed, shallower
+pockets which they dig for winter quarters; for
+those that spend their winters in the cold North
+make a hole to live in nights and cold and
+stormy days.</p>
+
+<p>The first step in building is to strike out a
+circle in the bark as large as the doorway is to
+be; that is, from an inch and a half to three
+or four inches in diameter according to the size
+of the woodpecker. It is nearly always a perfect
+circle. Try, if you please, to draw freehand a
+circle of dots as accurate as that which the woodpecker
+strikes out hurriedly with his bill, and see
+whether it is easy to do as well as he does.</p>
+
+<p>If the size and shape of the doorway suit him,
+the woodpecker scales off the bark inside his
+circle of holes and begins his hard work. He
+seems to take off his coat and work in his shirtsleeves,
+so vigorously does he labor as he clings
+with his stout toes, braced in position by his
+pointed tail. The chips fly out past him, or if<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[23]</a></span>
+they lie in the hole, he sweeps them out with his
+bill and pelts again at the same place. The
+pair take turns at the work. Who knows how
+long they work before resting? Do they take
+turns of equal length? Does one work more
+than the other? A pair of flickers will dig
+about two inches in a day, the hole being nearly
+two and a half inches in diameter. A week or
+more is consumed in digging the nest, which,
+among the flickers, is commonly from ten to
+eighteen inches deep. The hole usually runs in
+horizontally for a few inches and then curves
+down, ending in a chamber large enough to
+make a comfortable nest for the mother and her
+babies.</p>
+
+<p>What a good time the little ones have in their
+hole! Rain and frost cannot chill them; no
+enemy but the red squirrel is likely to disturb
+them. There they lie in their warm, dark chamber,
+looking up at the ray of light that comes in
+the doorway, until at last they hear the scratching
+of their mother&rsquo;s feet as she alights on the
+outside of the tree and clambers up to feed them.
+What a piping and calling they raise inside the
+hole, and how they all scramble up the walls of
+their chamber and thrust out their beaks to be
+fed, till the old tree looks as if it were blossoming
+with little woodpeckers&rsquo; hungry mouths!<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[24]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>V</h2>
+
+<h3>HOW A FLICKER FEEDS HER YOUNG<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a>
+</h3>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> Based upon the observations of Mr. William Brewster.</p></div>
+
+<p>As the house of the woodpecker has no windows
+and the old bird very nearly fills the doorway
+when she comes home, it is hard to find out
+just how she feeds her little ones. But one of
+our best naturalists has had the opportunity to
+observe it, and has told what he saw.</p>
+
+<p>A flicker had built a nest in the trunk of a
+rather small dead tree which, after the eggs were
+hatched, was accidentally broken off just at
+the entrance hole. This left the whole cavity
+exposed to the weather; but it was too late to
+desert the nest, and impossible to remove the
+young birds to another nest.</p>
+
+<p>When first visited, the five little birds were
+blind, naked, and helpless. They were motherless,
+too. Some one must have killed their pretty
+mother; for she never came to feed them, and
+the father was taking all the care of his little
+family. When disturbed the little birds hissed
+like snakes, as is the habit of the callow young<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[25]</a></span>
+of woodpeckers, chickadees, and other birds nesting
+habitually in holes in trees. When they were
+older and their eyes were open, they made a clatter
+much like the noise of a mowing-machine,
+and loud enough to be heard thirty yards away.</p>
+
+<p>The father came at intervals of from twenty
+to sixty minutes to feed the little ones. He
+was very shy, and came so quietly that he would
+be first seen when he alighted close by with a
+low little laugh or a subdued but anxious call
+to the young. &ldquo;Here I am again!&rdquo; he laughed;
+or &ldquo;Are you all right, children?&rdquo; he called to
+them. &ldquo;All right!&rdquo; they would answer, clattering
+in concert like a two-horse mower.</p>
+
+<p>As soon as they heard him scratching on the
+tree-trunk, up they would all clamber to the edge
+of the nest and hold out their gaping mouths to
+be fed. Each one was anxious to be fed first,
+because there never was enough to go round.
+There was always one that, like the little pig of
+the nursery tale, &ldquo;got none.&rdquo; When he came
+to the nest, the father would look around a
+moment, trying to choose the one he wanted to
+feed first. Did he always pick out the poor little
+one that had none the time before, I wonder?</p>
+
+<p>After the old bird had made his choice, he
+would bend over the little bird and drive his
+long bill down the youngster&rsquo;s throat as if to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[26]</a></span>
+run it through him. Then the little bird would
+catch hold as tightly as he could and hang on
+while his father jerked him up and down for a
+second or a second and a half with great rapidity.
+What was he doing? He was pumping
+food from his own stomach into the little one&rsquo;s.
+Many birds feed their young in this way. They
+do not hold the food in their own mouths, but
+swallow and perhaps partially digest it, so that it
+shall be fit for the tender little stomachs.</p>
+
+<p>While the woodpecker was pumping in this
+manner his motions were much the same as when
+he drummed, but his tail twitched as rapidly as
+his head and his wings quivered. The motion
+seemed to shake his whole body.</p>
+
+<p>In two weeks from the time when the little
+birds were blind, naked, helpless nestlings they
+became fully feathered and full grown, able to
+climb up to the top of the nest, from which
+they looked out with curiosity and interest.
+At any noise they would slip silently back. A
+day or two later they left the old nest and began
+their journeys.</p>
+
+<p>No naturalist has been able to tell us whether
+other woodpeckers than the golden-winged flicker
+feed their young in this way; and little is known
+of the number of kinds of birds that use this
+method, but it is suspected that it is far more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[27]</a></span>
+common than has ever been determined. If an
+old bird is seen to put her bill down a young one&rsquo;s
+throat and keep it there even so short a time as
+a second, it is probable that she is feeding the
+little one by regurgitation, that is, by pumping
+up food from her own stomach. Any bird seen
+doing this should be carefully watched. It has
+long been known that the domestic pigeon does
+this, and the same has been observed a number
+of times of the ruby-throated hummingbird. A
+California lady has taken some remarkable photographs
+of the Anna&rsquo;s hummingbird in the act,
+showing just how it is done.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[28]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>VI</h2>
+
+<h3>FRIEND DOWNY</h3>
+
+
+<p>No better little bird comes to our orchards
+than our friend the downy woodpecker. He is
+the smallest and one of the most sociable of our
+woodpeckers,&mdash;a little, spotted, black-and-white
+fellow, precisely like his larger cousin the hairy,
+except in having the outer tail-feathers barred
+instead of plain. Nearly everything that can be
+said of one is equally true of the other on a
+smaller scale. They look alike, they act alike,
+and their nests and eggs are alike in everything
+but size.</p>
+
+<p>Downy is the most industrious of birds. He
+is seldom idle and never in mischief. As he
+does not fear men, but likes to live in orchards
+and in the neighborhood of fields, he is a good
+friend to us. On the farm he installs himself
+as Inspector of Apple-trees. It is an old and an
+honorable profession among birds. The pay is
+small, consisting only of what can be picked up,
+but, as cultivated trees are so infested with insects
+that food is always plentiful, and as they have
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[29]</a></span>usually a dead branch suitable to nest in, Downy
+asks no more. Summer and winter he works on
+our orchards. At sunrise he begins, and he
+patrols the branches till sunset. He taps on the
+trunks to see whether he can hear any rascally
+borers inside. He inspects every tree carefully
+in a thorough and systematic way, beginning low
+down and following up with a peek into every
+crevice and a tap upon every spot that looks suspicious.
+If he sees anything which ought not to
+be there, he removes it at once.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_004.jpg" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p>A moth had laid her eggs in a crack in the
+bark, expecting to hatch out a fine brood of
+caterpillars: but Downy ate them all, thus saving
+a whole branch from being overrun with caterpillars
+and left fruitless, leafless, and dying. A
+beetle had just deposited her eggs here. Downy
+saw her, and took not only the eggs but the beetle
+herself. Those eggs would have hatched into
+boring larv&aelig;, which would have girdled and killed
+some of the branches, or have burrowed under
+the bark, causing it to fall off, or have bored
+into the wood and, perhaps, have killed the tree.
+Nor is the full-grown borer exempt. Downy
+hears him, pecks a few strokes, and harpoons
+him with unerring aim. When Downy has
+made an arrest in this way, the prisoner does
+not escape from the police. Here is a colony<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[30]</a></span>
+of ants, running up the tree in one line and
+down in another, touching each other with their
+feelers as they pass. A feast for our friend!
+He takes both columns, and leaves none to tell
+the tale. This is a good deed, too, since ants
+are of no benefit to fruit-trees and are very fond
+of the dead-ripe fruit.</p>
+
+<p>And Downy is never too busy to listen for
+borers. They are fine plump morsels much to
+his taste, not so sour as ants, nor so hard-shelled
+as beetles, nor so insipid as insects&rsquo; eggs. A
+good borer is his preferred dainty. The work he
+does in catching borers is of incalculable benefit,
+for no other bird can take his place. The warblers,
+the vireos, and some other birds in summer,
+the chickadees and nuthatches all the year
+round, are helping to eat up the eggs and
+insects that lie near the surface, but the only
+birds equipped for digging deep under the bark
+and dragging forth the refractory grubs are the
+woodpeckers.</p>
+
+<p>So Downy works at his self-appointed task in
+our orchards summer and winter, as regular as a
+policeman on his beat. But he is much more
+than a policeman, for he acts as judge, jury,
+jailer, and jail. All the evidence he asks against
+any insect is to find him loafing about the premises.
+&ldquo;I swallow him first and find out afterwards<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[31]</a></span>
+whether he was guilty,&rdquo; says Downy with
+a wink and a nod.</p>
+
+<p>Most birds do not stay all the year, in the
+North, at least, and most, in return for their
+labors in the spring, demand some portion of
+the fruit or grain of midsummer and autumn.
+Not so Downy. His services are entirely gratuitous;
+he works twice as long as most others.
+He spends the year with us, no winter ever
+too severe for him, no summer too hot; and
+he never taxes the orchard, nor takes tribute
+from the berry patch. Only a quarter of his
+food is vegetable, the rest being made up of
+injurious insects; and the vegetable portion
+consists entirely of wild fruits and weed-seeds,
+nothing that man eats or uses. Downy feeds
+on the wild dogwood berries, a few pokeberries,
+the fruit of the woodbine, and the seeds of the
+poison-ivy,&mdash;whatever scanty and rather inferior
+fare is to be had at Nature&rsquo;s fall and winter
+table. If in the cold winter weather we will take
+pains to hang out a bone with some meat on it,
+raw or cooked, or a piece of suet, taking care
+that it is not salted,&mdash;for few wild birds except
+the crossbills can eat salted food,&mdash;we may see
+how he appreciates our thoughtfulness. Shall we
+grudge him a bone from our own abundance, or
+neglect to fasten it firmly out of reach of the cat<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[32]</a></span>
+and dog? If his cousin the hairy and his neighbor
+the chickadee come and eat with him, bid
+them a hearty welcome. The feast is spread for
+all the birds that help men, and friend Downy
+shall be their host.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[33]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>VII</h2>
+
+<h3>PERSONA NON GRATA</h3>
+
+
+<p>We shall not attempt to deny that Downy
+has an unprincipled relative. While it is no discredit,
+it is a great misfortune to Downy, who is
+often murdered merely because he looks a little,
+a very little, like this disreputable cousin of his.
+The real offender is the sapsucker, that musical
+genius of whom we have already spoken.</p>
+
+<p>The popular belief is that every woodpecker is
+a sapsucker, and that every hole he digs in a
+tree is an injury to the tree. We have seen that
+every hole Downy digs is a benefit, and now we
+wish to learn why it is that the sapsucker&rsquo;s work
+is any more injurious than other woodpeckers&rsquo;
+holes; how we are to recognize the sapsucker&rsquo;s
+work; and how much damage he does. We will
+do what the scientists often do,&mdash;examine the
+bird&rsquo;s work and make it tell us the story. There
+is no danger of hurting the sapsucker&rsquo;s reputation.
+The farmer could have no worse opinion
+of him; and, though the case has been appealed
+to the higher courts of science more than once,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[34]</a></span>
+where the sapsucker&rsquo;s cause has been eloquently
+and ably defended, the verdict has gone against
+him. Scientists now do not deny that the sapsucker
+does harm. But his worst injury is less
+in the damage he does to the trees than in the ill-will
+and suspicion he creates against woodpeckers
+which do no harm at all. If you will study the
+picture and the descriptions in the Key to the
+Woodpeckers, you will be able
+to recognize the sapsucker and
+his nearest relatives, whether in
+the East or in the West. But
+all sapsuckers may be known by
+their pale yellowish under parts,
+and by the work they leave behind.
+As the yellow-bellied sapsucker
+is the only one found east
+of the Rocky Mountains, we shall
+speak only of him and his work.</p>
+
+<hr />
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_005.jpg" class="wide1" alt="Work of Sapsucker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Work of Sapsucker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>Here is a specimen of the
+yellow-bellied sapsucker&rsquo;s work
+which I picked up under the
+tree from which it had fallen.
+We do not need to inquire whether the tree
+was injured by its falling, for we know that
+the loss of sound and healthy bark is always a
+damage. Was this sound bark? Yes, because
+it is still firm and new. The sap in it dried
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[35]</a></span>quickly, showing that neither disease nor worms
+caused it to fall; it is clean and hard on the
+back, showing that it came from a live tree, not
+from a dead, rotting log.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_006.jpg" class="wide2" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p>How do I know that a bird caused it to fall?
+The marks are precisely such as are always left
+by a woodpecker&rsquo;s bill. How do I know that
+it was a sapsucker&rsquo;s work? Because no other
+woodpecker has the habit which characterizes
+the sapsucker, of sinking holes in straight lines.
+The sapsuckers drill lines of holes sometimes
+around and sometimes up and down the tree-trunk,
+but almost always in rings or belts about
+the trunk or branches. A girdle may be but a
+single line of holes, or it may consist of four or
+five, or more, lines. Sometimes a band will be
+two feet wide; and as many as eight hundred
+holes have been counted on the trunk of a single
+tree. Such extensive peckings, however, are to
+be expected only on large forest trees. Most
+fruit and ornamental trees are girdled a few
+times about the trunk, and about the principal
+branches just below the nodes, or forks.</p>
+
+<p>Why did the bird dig these holes? There are
+three things that he might have obtained,&mdash;sap,
+the inner bark, and boring larv&aelig;. Some
+naturalists have suggested a fourth as possible,&mdash;the
+insects that would be attracted by the sap.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[36]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>We will see what the piece of bark tells us.
+It is four and a half inches long, by an inch and
+a half wide, and its area of six and three fourths
+square inches has forty-four punctures. Does
+this look as if the bird were digging grubs?
+Do borers live in such straight little streets?
+The number and arrangement of the holes show
+that he was not seeking borers, while the naturalists
+tell us that he never eats a borer unless
+by accident. What did he get? Undoubtedly
+he pecked away some of the inner bark. All
+these holes are much larger on the back side of
+the specimen than on the outer surface. While
+the damp inner bark would shrink a little on
+exposure to the air, we know that it could not
+shrink as much as this; and investigation has
+shown that the sapsucker feeds largely on just
+such food, for it has been found in his stomach.
+Two other possible food-substances remain,&mdash;sap
+and insects. We know that the sapsucker
+eats many insects, but it is impossible to prove
+that he intended these holes for insect lures.
+Sap he might have gotten from them, if he
+wished it. We know that the white birch is full
+of excellent sap, from which can be made a birch
+candy, somewhat bitter, but nearly as good as
+horehound candy. The rock and red maples
+and the white canoe birch are the only trees in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[37]</a></span>
+our Northern forests from which we make candy.
+A strong probability that our bird wanted sap
+is indicated by the arrangement of the holes.
+Usually he drills his holes in rings around the
+tree-trunk, but in this instance his longest lines
+of holes are vertical. If our sapsucker was
+drilling for sap, he arranged his holes so that it
+would almost run into his mouth, lazy bird!</p>
+
+<p>Our piece of bark has taught us:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>That the sapsucker injured this tree.</p>
+
+<p>That he was not after grubs.</p>
+
+<p>That he got, and undoubtedly ate, the soft
+inner bark of the tree.</p>
+
+<p>That he got, and may have drunk, the sap.</p>
+
+<p>We could not infer any more from a single
+instance, but the naturalists assure us that the
+bird is in the habit of injuring trees, that he
+never eats grubs intentionally, and that he eats
+too much bark for it to be regarded as taken
+accidentally with other food. About the sap
+they cannot be so sure, as it digests very quickly.
+There remain two points to prove: whether the
+sapsucker drills his holes for the sake of the
+sap, or for insects attracted by the sap, provided
+that he eats anything but the inner bark.</p>
+
+<p>Our little specimen can tell us no more, but
+two mountain ash trees which were intimate
+acquaintances of mine from childhood can go on<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[38]</a></span>
+with the story. Do not be surprised that I
+speak of them as friends; the naturalist who
+does not make <i>friends</i> of the creatures and
+plants about will hear few stories from them.
+These trees would not tell this tale to any one
+but an intimate acquaintance. Let us hear what
+they have to say about the sapsucker.</p>
+
+<p>There are in the garden of my old home two
+mountain ash trees, thirty-six years of age, each
+having grown from a sprout that sprang up beside
+an older tree cut down in 1863. They stand
+not more than two rods apart; have the same
+soil, the same amount of sun and rain, the same
+exposure to wind, and equal care. During all
+the years of my childhood one was a perfectly
+healthy tree, full of fruit in its season, while the
+other bore only scanty crops, and was always
+troubled with cracked and scaling bark. To-day
+the unhealthy tree is more vigorous than
+ever before, while its formerly stalwart brother
+stands a mere wreck of its former life and beauty.
+What should be the cause of such a remarkable
+change when all conditions of growth have remained
+the same?</p>
+
+<p>I admit that there is some internal difference
+in the trees, for all the birds tell me of it. One
+has always borne larger and more abundant fruit
+than the other, but this is no reason why the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[39]</a></span>
+birds should strip all the berries from that tree
+before eating any from the other. When we
+know that the favorite tree stands directly in
+front of the windows of a much-used room and
+overhangs a frequented garden path, the preference
+becomes more marked. But robins, grosbeaks,
+purple finches, and the whole berry-eating
+tribe agree to choose one and neglect the other,
+and even the spring migrants will leave the gay
+red tassels of fruit still swinging on one tree, to
+scratch over the leaves and eat the fallen berries
+that lie beneath the other. My own taste is not
+keen in choosing between bitter berries, but the
+birds all agree that there is a decided difference
+in these trees,&mdash;did agree, I should say, for their
+favorite is the tree that is dying. Evidently
+this is a question of taste. It is interesting to
+observe that the sapsucker, which was never
+seen to touch the fruit of the trees, agrees with
+the fruit-eating birds. Nearly all his punctures
+were in the tree now dying. Is there a difference
+in the taste of the sap? Does the taste of
+the sap affect the taste of the fruit? Or is it
+merely a question of quantity? If he comes for
+sap, he prefers one tree to the other on the score
+either of better quality or greater quantity.</p>
+
+<p>We will discuss later whether it is sap that he
+wishes: all that now concerns us is to note<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[40]</a></span>
+that the internal difference, whatever it is, is in
+favor of the tree that is dying; while the only
+external difference appears to be the marks left
+by the sapsucker. While one tree is sparingly
+marked by him, the other is tattooed with his
+punctures, placed in single rings and in belts
+around trunk and branches beneath every fork.
+It is a law of reasoning that, when every condition
+but one is the same and the effects are different,
+the one exceptional condition is the <i>cause</i>
+of the difference. If these trees are alike in
+everything except the work of the sapsucker (the
+only internal difference apparently <i>offsetting</i> his
+work in part), what inference do we draw as to
+the effect of his work?</p>
+
+<p>We presume that he is killing the tree, without
+as yet knowing how he does it. What is
+his object? Good observers have stated that
+he draws a little sap in order to attract flies and
+wasps; that the sap is not drawn for its own
+sake, but as a bait for insects. Is this theory
+true?</p>
+
+<p>The first objection is that it is improbable.
+The sapsucker is a retiring, woodland bird that
+would hesitate to come into a town garden a
+mile away from the nearest woods unless to get
+something he could not find in the woods. Had
+he wanted insects, he would have tapped a tree<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[41]</a></span>
+in the woods, or else he would have caught them
+in his usual flycatching fashion. There must
+have been something about the mountain ash tree
+that he craved. As it is a very rare tree in the
+vicinity of my home, the sapsucker&rsquo;s only chance
+to satisfy his longing was by coming to some
+town garden like our own.</p>
+
+<p>Not only is the theory improbable, but it fails
+to explain the sapsucker&rsquo;s actions in this instance.
+In twenty years he was never seen to
+catch an insect that was attracted by the sap he
+drew. This does not deny that he may have
+caught insects now and then, but it does deny
+that he set the sap running for a lure. As he
+was never far away, and was sometimes only
+four and a half feet by measure from a chamber
+window, all that he did could be seen. He
+did not catch insects at his holes. He drank
+sap and ate bark.</p>
+
+<p>Finally, the theory is not only improbable and
+inadequate, but in this instance it is impossible.
+I do not remember seeing a sapsucker in the tree
+in the spring; if he came in the summer, it must
+have been at rare intervals; but he was always
+there in the fall, when the leaves were dropping.
+At that season the insect hordes had been dispersed
+by the autumnal frosts, so that we know
+he did not come for insects.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[42]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>In the many years during which I watched
+the sapsuckers&mdash;for there were undoubtedly a
+number of different birds that came, although
+never more than one at a time&mdash;there was such
+a curious similarity in their actions that it is
+entirely proper to speak as if the same bird
+returned year after year. His visits, as I have
+said, were usually made at the same season. He
+would come silently and early, with the evident
+intention of making this an all-day excursion.
+By eight o&rsquo;clock he would be seen clinging to
+a branch and curiously observant of the dining-room
+window, which at that hour probably excited
+both his interest and his alarm. Early in
+the day he showed considerable activity, flitting
+from limb to limb and sinking a few holes, three
+or four in a row, usually <i>above</i> the previous
+upper girdle of the limbs he selected to work
+upon. After he had tapped several limbs he
+would sit waiting patiently for the sap to flow,
+lapping it up quickly when the drop was large
+enough. At first he would be nervous, taking
+alarm at noises and wheeling away on his broad
+wings till his fright was over, when he would
+steal quietly back to his sap-holes. When not
+alarmed, his only movement was from one row
+of holes to another, and he tended them with
+considerable regularity. As the day wore on<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[43]</a></span>
+he became less excitable, and clung cloddishly to
+his tree-trunk with ever increasing torpidity, until
+finally he hung motionless as if intoxicated, tippling
+in sap, a disheveled, smutty, silent bird,
+stupefied with drink, with none of that brilliancy
+of plumage and light-hearted gayety which made
+him the noisiest and most conspicuous bird of our
+April woods.</p>
+
+<p>Our mountain ash trees have told us several
+facts about the sapsucker:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>That he did not come to eat insects.</p>
+
+<p>That he did come to drink sap, and that he
+probably ate the inner bark also.</p>
+
+<p>That he drank the sap because he liked it,
+not for some secondary object, as insects.</p>
+
+<p>That he could detect difference in the quality
+or quantity of the sap, which caused him to
+prefer a particular tree.</p>
+
+<p>That this difference apparently was in the
+taste of the sap, and that the effects of a day&rsquo;s
+drinking of mountain ash sap seemed to indicate
+some intoxicant or narcotic quality in the
+sap of that particular tree.</p>
+
+<p>That the effect of his work upon the tree
+was apparently injurious, as it is the only cause
+assigned of a healthy tree&rsquo;s dying before a less
+healthy one of the same age and species, subject
+all its life to the same conditions.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[44]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>So much we have learned about this sapsucker&rsquo;s
+habits, and now we should like to know why
+his work is harmful, and why that of the other
+woodpeckers is not. It is not because he drinks
+the sap. All the sap he could eat or waste
+would not harm the tree, if allowed to run out
+of a few holes. Think how many gallons the
+sugar-makers drain out of a single tree without
+killing the tree. But the sugar-maker takes the
+sap in the spring, when the crude sap is mounting
+up in the tree, while the sapsucker does not
+begin his work till midsummer or autumn, when
+the tree is sending down its elaborated sap to
+feed the trunk and make it grow. This accounts
+for the woodpecker&rsquo;s digging his pits
+<i>above</i> the lines of the holes already in the tree.
+The loss of this elaborated sap is a greater injury
+than the waste of a far larger quantity of
+crude sap, so that on the season of the year
+when the sapsucker digs his holes depends in
+large measure the amount of damage he does.
+The injury that he does to the wood itself is
+trivial. He is not a wood<i>pecker</i> except at time
+of nesting, and most woodpeckers prefer to build
+in a dead or dying branch, where their work
+does no hurt. But we know very well that a
+tree may be a wreck, riven from top to bottom
+by lightning, split open to the heart by the tempest,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[45]</a></span>
+entirely hollow the whole length of its
+trunk, and yet may flourish and bear fruit.
+The tree lives in its outer layers. It may be
+crippled in almost any way, if the bark is left
+uninjured; but if an inch of bark is cut out
+entirely around the tree, it will die, for the sap
+can no longer run up and down to nourish it.</p>
+
+<p>This is the sapsucker&rsquo;s crime: he girdles the
+tree,&mdash;not at his first coming, nor yet at his
+second, not with one row of holes, nor yet
+with two; but finally, after years perhaps, when
+row after row of punctures, each checking a
+little the flow of sap, have overlapped and offset
+each other and narrowed the channels through
+which it could mount and descend, until the flow
+is stopped. Then the tree dies. It is not the
+holes he makes, nor the sap he draws, but the
+way he places his holes that makes the sapsucker
+an unwelcome visitor. For an unacceptable
+individual he is to the farmer,&mdash;<i>persona
+non grata</i>, as kings say of ambassadors who do
+not please their majesties. What shall we do
+with him, the only black sheep in all the woodpecker
+flock? Let him alone, unless we are positively
+sure that we know him from every other
+kind of woodpecker. The damage he does is
+trifling compared with what we should do if we
+made war upon other woodpeckers for some supposed
+wrong-doing of the sapsucker.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[46]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>VIII</h2>
+
+<h3>EL CARPINTERO</h3>
+
+
+<p>In California and along the southwestern
+boundary of the United States lives a woodpecker
+known among the Mexicans as El Carpintero,
+the Carpenter.</p>
+
+<p>Carpentering is both his profession and his
+pastime, and he seems really to enjoy the work.
+When there is nothing more pressing to be done,
+he spends his time tinkering around, fitting
+acorns into holes in such great numbers and in
+so workmanlike a fashion that we do not know
+which is more remarkable, his patience or his
+skill. Every acorn is fitted into a separate hole
+made purposely for it, every one is placed butt
+end out and is driven in flush with the surface,
+so that a much frequented tree often appears as
+if studded with ornamental nails. &ldquo;What an
+industrious bird!&rdquo; we exclaim; but still it takes
+some time to appreciate how enormous is the
+labor of the Carpenter. Whole trees will sometimes
+be covered with his work, until a single
+tree has thousands of acorns bedded into its bark<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[47]</a></span>
+so neatly and tightly that no other creature can
+remove them.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_007.jpg" alt="Work of Californian Woodpecker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Work of Californian Woodpecker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>We may take for examination, from specimens
+of the Carpenter&rsquo;s work, a piece of spruce bark
+seven inches long by six wide, containing ten
+acorns and two empty holes. As spruce bark
+is so much harder and rougher than the pine<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[48]</a></span>
+bark in which he usually stores his nuts,<a name="FNanchor_1_2" id="FNanchor_1_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_2" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> this
+specimen looks rough and unfinished, and even
+shows some acorns driven in sidewise; but for
+another reason I have preferred it to better-looking
+examples of his work for study. As
+we shall see later, it gives us a definite bit of
+information about the bird.</p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_2" id="Footnote_1_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_2"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> They often use white-oak bark, fence-posts, telegraph poles,
+even the stalks of century-plants, when trees are not convenient.
+(Merriam, <i>Auk</i>, viii. 117.)</p></div>
+
+<p>Think of the work of digging these twelve
+holes. Think of the labor of carrying these ten
+large acorns and driving them in so tightly that
+after years of shrinking they cannot be removed
+by a knife without injuring either the acorn or
+the bark. Yet how small a part of the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+year&rsquo;s work is here! How long could
+he live on ten acorns? How many must he
+gather for his winter&rsquo;s needs? How many must
+he lose by forgetting to come back to them?
+We cannot calculate the work a single bird does
+nor the nuts he eats, for several birds usually
+work in company and may use the same tree;
+but all the woodpeckers are large eaters, and the
+Californian has been singled out for special
+mention.</p>
+
+<p>Can we estimate the amount of work required
+to lay up one day&rsquo;s food? Judging by the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[49]</a></span>
+amount of nuts some other birds will eat, I
+should think that all ten acorns contained in this
+piece of bark could be eaten in one day without
+surfeit. The estimate seems to me well inside
+of his probable appetite. I have experimented
+on this piece of bark, using a woodpecker&rsquo;s bill
+for a tool, and it takes me twenty minutes to
+dig a hole as large but not as neat as these.
+Doubtless it would not take the woodpecker as
+long; but at my rate of working, four hours
+were spent in digging these twelve holes. Then
+each acorn had to be hunted up and brought to
+the hole prepared for it. This entailed a journey,
+it may have been only from one tree to
+another, or it may have been, and very likely was,
+a considerable flight. For these acorns grew on
+oak-trees, and we find them driven into the bark
+of pines and spruces.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_008.jpg" class="wide2" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p>This it is which gives our specimen its particular
+interest. While oaks and pines may be intermingled,
+though they naturally prefer different
+soils and situations, and in the Rocky Mountains
+the pine-belt lies above the oak region, spruce
+and oak trees do not grow in the same soil.
+The spruce-belt stands higher up than the pine.
+As these nuts are stored in the bark of a spruce-tree,
+we have clear evidence that the bird must
+have carried them some distance. For every<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[50]</a></span>
+nut he made the whole journey back and forth,
+since he could carry but one at a time,&mdash;ten
+long trips back and forth, certainly consuming
+several minutes each.</p>
+
+<p>Then each acorn had to be fitted to its hole.
+We have already spoken of the accuracy with
+which this is done, so that the Carpenter&rsquo;s work
+is a standing taunt to the hungry jays and
+squirrels which would gladly eat his nuts if
+they could get them. A careful observer tells
+us that when the hole is too small, the woodpecker
+takes the acorn out and makes the hole
+a little larger, working so cautiously, however,
+that he sometimes makes several trials before the
+acorn can be fitted and driven in flush with the
+bark. Some of these acorns show cracks down
+the sides, as if they had been split either in
+forcibly pulling them out of a hole not deep
+enough for them, or in driving them when
+green and soft into a hole too small for them.
+Of course after each trial the acorn must be
+hunted up where it lies on the ground and
+driven in again, and this takes considerable
+time.</p>
+
+<p>As nearly as we can estimate it, not less than
+half a day must have been spent in putting
+these acorns where we find them. With smaller
+acorns, stored in pine bark, less time would have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[51]</a></span>
+been required; but weeks, if not months, of
+work are spent in laying up the winter&rsquo;s stores.</p>
+
+<p>How the woodpecker&rsquo;s back and jaws must
+have ached! Surely he is human enough to get
+tired with his work, and it is not play to do what
+this bird has done. Some of the acorns measure
+seven tenths of an inch in diameter by nine
+tenths in length, and the bird that carried them
+is smaller than a robin. How he must have
+hurried to reach his tree when the acorn was
+extra large! Yet he took time to drive every
+one in point foremost. Even those that lie
+upon their sides must have been forced into
+position by tapping the butt. He knows very
+well which end of an acorn is which, does our
+Carpenter.</p>
+
+<p>But what is the use of all this work? Why,
+if he wants acorns, does he not eat them as they
+lie scattered under the oaks, instead of taking
+pains to carry them away and put them into
+holes for the fun of eating them out of the
+holes afterward? The absurdity of this has
+led some people to surmise that the Carpenter
+chooses none but weevilly acorns, and stores
+them that the grub inside may grow large and
+fat and delicious. This would be very interesting,
+if it were true. There must of course be
+more weevilly acorns on the ground than he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[52]</a></span>
+picks up, so that he could get as many grubs
+without taking all this trouble, and there is no
+reason why they should not be as large and
+good as those hatched out in holes in trees.
+When I wish to keep nuts sweet, I spread them
+out on the attic floor in the sun and air, keeping
+them where they will not touch each other.
+The Carpenter does practically the same thing.
+Is it probable that he tries to raise a fine crop
+of grubs in this way? If so, one or the other
+of us is doing just the wrong thing. But if weevils
+are what the Carpenter wants, then the nuts
+in the bark should be wormy; yet only two of
+them show any sign of a weevil, and of these one
+appears from its dull color and weather-beaten
+look to be a nut deposited several years before
+the others by some other woodpecker. Every
+other acorn is as hard, shining, and bright colored
+as when it fell from the tree. Evidently the
+bird picked these nuts up while they were fresh
+and good; perhaps he chose them <i>because</i> they
+were good and fresh. The possibility becomes
+almost a certainty when we observe that naturalists
+agree that the Carpenter uses no acorns
+but the sweet-tasting species. Now there are
+likely to be as many grubs in one kind of an
+acorn as in another, and he would scarcely refuse
+any kind that contained them, if grubs<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[53]</a></span>
+were what he wanted. The fact that he takes
+sweet acorns, and those only, shows that it is the
+meat of the nut that he wants. And all good
+naturalists agree that it is the kernel itself that
+he eats.</p>
+
+<p>Why he stores them is not hard to decide
+when we remember that the Californian woodpecker,
+over a large part of his range, is a
+mountain bird. Though we think of California
+as the land of sunshine, it is not universal summer
+there. The mountain ranges have a winter
+as severe as that of New England, with a heavy
+snowfall. When the snow lies several feet deep
+among the pines and spruces of the uplands, the
+Carpenter is not distressed for food: his pantry
+is always above the level of the snow; he need
+neither scratch a meagre living from the edges
+of the snow-banks, nor go fasting. His fall&rsquo;s
+work has provided him not only with the necessities,
+but with the luxuries of life.</p>
+
+<p>But why does he spend so much time in making
+holes? He might tuck his nuts into some
+natural crevice in the oak bark, or drop them
+into cavities which all birds know so well where
+to find. And leave them where any pilfering
+jay would be able to pick them out at his ease?
+Or put them in the track of every wandering
+squirrel? Jays and squirrels are never too honest<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[54]</a></span>
+to refuse to steal, but they find it harder
+to get the woodpecker&rsquo;s stores out of his pine-tree
+pantry than to pick up honest acorns of
+their own. So, like the woodpecker, they lay
+up their own stores of nuts, and feed on them
+in winter, or go hungry.</p>
+
+<p>We have had very little aid from anything
+except the piece of bark we were studying,
+yet we have learned that the Californian woodpecker
+is a good carpenter; that he works hard
+at his trade; that he shows remarkable foresight
+in collecting his food, much ingenuity in
+housing it, good judgment in putting it where
+his enemies cannot get it, and wisdom in the
+plan he has adopted to give him a good supply
+of fresh nuts at a season when the autumn&rsquo;s
+crop is buried under the deep snow.</p>
+
+<p>If I were a Californian boy, I think I should
+spend my time in trying to find out more about
+this wise woodpecker, concerning which much
+remains to be discovered.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[55]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>IX</h2>
+
+<h3>A RED-HEADED COUSIN</h3>
+
+
+<p>Besides his half-brothers, the narrow-fronted
+and ant-eating woodpeckers, the Carpenter has
+a numerous family of cousins,&mdash;the red-headed,
+the red-bellied, the golden-fronted, the Gila,<a name="FNanchor_1_3" id="FNanchor_1_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_3" class="fnanchor">[1]</a>
+and the Lewis&rsquo;s woodpeckers. These all belong
+to one genus, and are much alike in structure,
+though totally different in color. Most of them
+are Western or Southwestern birds, but one is
+found in nearly all parts of the United States
+lying between the Hudson River and the Rocky
+Mountains, and is the most abundant woodpecker
+of the middle West. This well-known cousin is
+the red-headed woodpecker, the tricolored beauty
+that sits on fence-posts and telegraph poles, and
+sallies out, a blaze of white, steel-blue, and scarlet,
+a gorgeous spectacle, whenever an insect
+flits by. He is the one that raps so merrily on
+your tin roofs when he feels musical.</p>
+
+<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_3" id="Footnote_1_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_3"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> So named from being found along the Gila River.</p></div>
+
+<p>In many ways the red-head, as he is familiarly
+called, is like his carpenter cousin. Both<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[56]</a></span>
+indulge in long-continued drumming; both catch
+flies expertly on the wing; and both have the
+curious habit of laying up stores of food for
+future use. The Californian woodpecker not
+only stores acorns, but insect food as well. But
+though the Carpenter&rsquo;s habits have long been
+known, it is a comparatively short time since
+the red-head was first detected laying up winter
+supplies.</p>
+
+<p>The first to report this habit of the red-head
+was a gentleman in South Dakota, who one
+spring noticed that they were eating <i>young</i>
+grasshoppers. At that season he supposed that
+all the insects of the year previous would be
+dead or torpid, and certainly full-grown, while
+those of the coming summer would be still in
+the egg. Where could the bird find half-grown
+grasshoppers? Being interested to explain this,
+he watched the red-heads until he saw that one
+went frequently to a post, and appeared to get
+something out of a crevice in its side. In that
+post he found nearly a hundred grasshoppers,
+still alive, but wedged in so tightly they could
+not escape. He also found other hiding-places
+all full of grasshoppers, and discovered that the
+woodpeckers lived upon these stores nearly all
+winter.</p>
+
+<p>But it is not grasshoppers only that the red-head
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[57]</a></span>hoards, though he is very fond of them.
+In some parts of the country it is easier to find
+nuts than to find grasshoppers, and they are
+much less perishable food. The red-head is
+very fond of both acorns and beechnuts. Probably
+he eats chestnuts also. Who knows how
+many kinds of nuts the red-head eats? You
+might easily determine not only what he will
+eat, but what he prefers, if a red-headed woodpecker
+lives near you. Lay out different kinds
+of nuts on different days, putting them on a
+shed roof, or in some place where squirrels and
+blue jays would not be likely to dare to steal
+them, and see whether he takes all the kinds
+you offer. Then lay out mixed nuts and notice
+which ones he carries off first. If he takes all
+of one kind before he takes any of the others, we
+may be sure that he has discovered his favorite
+nut. Such little experiments furnish just the
+information which scientific men are glad to get.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_009.jpg" class="wide2" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p>It is well known that the red-head is very
+fond of beechnuts. Every other year we expect
+a full crop of nuts, and close observation shows
+that the red-heads come to the North in much
+larger numbers and stay much later on these
+years of plenty than on the years of scanty
+crops. Lately it has been discovered that they
+not only eat beechnuts all the fall, but store<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[58]</a></span>
+them up for winter use. This time the observation
+was made in Indiana. There, when the nuts
+were abundant, the red-heads were seen busily
+carrying them off. Their accumulations were
+found in all sorts of places: cavities in old tree-trunks
+contained nuts by the handful; knot-holes,
+cracks, crevices, seams in the barns were
+filled full of nuts. Nuts were tucked into the
+cracks in fence-posts; they were driven into
+railroad ties; they were pounded in between
+the shingles on the roofs; if a board was sprung
+out, the space behind it was filled with nuts,
+and bark or wood was often brought to cover
+over the gathered store. No doubt children
+often found these hiding-places and ate the nuts,
+thinking they were robbing some squirrel&rsquo;s
+hoard.</p>
+
+<p>In the South, where the beech-tree is replaced
+by the oak, the red-heads eat acorns. I
+should like to know whether they store acorns
+as they do beechnuts. Are chestnuts ever laid
+up for winter? How far south is the habit kept
+up? Is it observed beyond the limits of a regular
+and considerable snowfall? That is, do the
+birds lay up their nuts in order to keep them
+out of the snow, or for some other reason?</p>
+
+<p>It remains to be discovered if other woodpeckers
+have hoarding-places. We know that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[59]</a></span>
+the sapsucker eats beechnuts, and the downy
+and the hairy woodpeckers also; that the red-bellied
+woodpecker and the golden-winged flicker
+eat acorns; and I have seen the downy woodpecker
+eating chestnuts, or the grubs in them,
+hanging head downward at the very tip of the
+branches like a chickadee. It may be possible
+that some of these lay up winter stores.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_010.jpg" alt="Head of the Lewis&#39;s Woodpecker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Head of the Lewis&#39;s Woodpecker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>It is known that the Lewis&rsquo;s woodpecker occasionally
+shows signs of a hoarding instinct. It
+was recently noted that in the San Bernardino
+Mountains of California the Lewis&rsquo;s woodpecker,
+after driving away the smaller Californian woodpeckers,
+tried to put acorns into the holes the
+Carpenter had made, but, being unused to the
+work, did it very clumsily.
+Soon after this observation
+was published,
+a boy friend living near
+Denver told me that a
+short time before he had
+seen a woodpecker that had a large quantity
+of acorns shelled and broken into quarters, on
+which he was feeding. This woodpecker was
+identified beyond a doubt as the Lewis&rsquo;s woodpecker.
+So we begin to suspect that the habit
+of storing up food is not an uncommon one
+among the woodpeckers.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[60]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>X</h2>
+
+<h3>A STUDY OF ACQUIRED HABITS</h3>
+
+
+<p>Something interesting yet remains to be discovered
+of the hoarding habit of the red-head.
+How strange that so familiar a bird should have
+a habit so easily detected, and yet that no one in
+all these years should speak of it! Who does not
+know how mice and chipmunks hide their food?
+Who has not watched the blue jay skulking off to
+hide an acorn where he will be sure to forget it?
+Who does not remember the articles his pet Jim
+Crow stole and lost to him forever? The hoarding
+habit has long been observed of many dull-colored,
+rare, or insignificant creatures. That
+one so noisy, gay-colored, tame, and abundant
+as our red-headed woodpecker should have the
+same habit and escape observation is certainly
+remarkable. But though it is over twenty years
+since the storing of grasshoppers was recorded
+and twelve since the practice of laying up beechnuts
+was observed, very little seems to have been
+learned of the habit since these records were
+made.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[61]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>There are two points to be considered: the
+habit long remained unknown; after it was discovered,
+it was long in being reaffirmed. It
+seems that, if it were a general habit, more
+would be known about it. Now if it is not a
+universal habit, it must be one of two alternatives,
+either a custom falling into disuse, or a
+new one just being acquired. That a habit so
+remarkable and so advantageous should be discarded
+after being universal is scarcely possible;
+that a habit so noticeable, if it were general,
+should remain unknown is improbable; that a
+habit which made life in winter both secure and
+easy should, if introduced by a few enterprising
+birds, become a universal custom, is not without
+a parallel. The probabilities point to the custom
+of hoarding food as a recently <i>acquired habit</i>.</p>
+
+<p>Acquired habits are not rare among birds.
+The chimney swift has learned to nest in chimneys
+since the Pilgrims landed; for there were
+no chimneys before that time. There is the evidence
+of old writers to show that they acquired
+the habit within fifty years of the time of the
+first permanent settlements in New England.
+The eaves swallow learned to transfer its nest
+from the side of a cliff to the side of a barn
+in less time. Most birds will change their food
+as soon as a new dainty is procurable, and they<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[62]</a></span>
+will even invent methods of getting it, if it is
+much to their taste. The way the English sparrows
+have learned to tear open corn husks so as
+to eat the corn in the milk is a good example, for
+our maize does not grow in England, and they
+have had to learn about its good qualities in the
+few years since they have become established outside
+of the cities. Yet it is already a well-established
+habit. So quickly does a habit spread from
+one bird to another, until it becomes the rule instead
+of the exception! Acquired habits always
+show adaptability, and often much forethought
+and reason. It is the shrewd bird that learns
+new tricks.</p>
+
+<p>Now there is not known among birds any evidence
+of greater forethought and reason than
+working hard in pleasant weather, when food is
+plentiful beyond all hope of ever exhausting it,
+to lay up provision for winter. How does the
+woodpecker know that winter will come this
+year? That there was a winter last year and
+the year before does not make it certain, but
+only probable, that there will be one this year.
+We cannot know ourselves that the seasons will
+change until we learn enough of astronomy to
+understand the proof. Nor does instinct explain
+the habit, as some would declare: since not all
+red-heads have the habit, though all must have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[63]</a></span>
+instinct. It would seem as if memory and reason
+had devised this plan for outwitting winter, the
+bird&rsquo;s old enemy.</p>
+
+<p>The red-head is not a grub-eating woodpecker.
+Though beetles make up a third of his food,
+their larv&aelig; do not form any part of it. Half his
+food for the entire year is vegetable, and the
+animal portion is composed principally of beetles,
+ants, caterpillars, and grasshoppers, which in winter
+time are hidden in snug places, or are dead
+under the snow. There are few berries in winter.
+The few seedy, weedy plants that stick up
+above the snow give to the birds the little they
+have; but the red-head&rsquo;s vegetable fare is limited
+at that season and his animal food almost lacking.
+Winter in the North is all very well for the
+hairy and downy cousins that like to hammer
+frozen tree-trunks for frozen grubs; but our
+red-headed friend does not eat grubs by preference.
+Rather than change his habits he will
+change his boarding-place. So he is a migratory
+woodpecker, though the woodpeckers are naturally
+home-loving birds, and do not migrate from
+preference. If, however, he can lay up a store
+of vegetable or animal food, he can winter in
+any climate. Hoarding is thus an invention as
+important to the woodpecker world as electric
+cars and telephones are to men. The probabilities<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[64]</a></span>
+are that this is a recent improvement in
+the red-head&rsquo;s ways of living.</p>
+
+<p>Another set of facts increases the probabilities
+of our supposition. It is a very delicate subject
+to handle because it affects the reputation of a
+family in good standing; but there is positive
+proof that sometimes the red-head has been
+guilty of crimes which would give a man a full
+column in the newspapers with staring headlines.
+If such deeds were not a thousand times
+less common among woodpeckers than they are
+among men the red-head would be declared an
+outlaw. He has been proved to be a hen-roost
+robber, a murderer, and a cannibal. In Florida
+he has sucked hen&rsquo;s eggs. In Iowa he has been
+seen to kill a duckling. There is a record in
+Ohio that he pecked holes in the walls of the
+eaves swallow&rsquo;s nest and stole all the eggs, and
+that he was finally killed in the act of robbing
+a setting hen&rsquo;s nest. Within the space of fifteen
+years, from Montana, Georgia, Colorado,
+New York, and Ontario, in addition to the records
+mentioned already from Florida, Ohio, and
+Iowa, come accounts of his stealing birds&rsquo; eggs
+and murdering and eating other birds. The
+evidence is indisputable.</p>
+
+<p>It is charity to suppose that this is the work of
+natural criminals, or of degenerate, under-witted,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[65]</a></span>
+or demented woodpeckers. Why should there not
+be such individuals among birds? One point is
+certain: so notable a habit could not long escape
+detection, since it is a barnyard crime. He who
+robs hen&rsquo;s nests gets caught&mdash;if he is a bird.
+Either these occurrences are very rare, not seen
+because of their extreme rarity, or they indicate
+a new custom just coming in. And the same is
+true of the habit of hoarding food; it is rare, or
+it is new.</p>
+
+<p>The frequency of such occurrences can be determined
+only by observation; but the time of
+their origin might be approximated in another
+way. If we could fix the date when the bird
+could not have done what he is now doing for
+simple lack of opportunity, we might say that the
+habit has been acquired since a certain date&mdash;as
+we have said of the English sparrow eating
+maize, of the chimney swift nesting in chimneys,
+and the cliff swallow building under the eaves.
+But we have no such help on the case of the red-head,
+which never has been without opportunities
+to get birds&rsquo; eggs and to kill other birds.</p>
+
+<p>But there is a parallel case in another species
+where the date of an acquired habit can be
+proved. In Florida the red-bellied woodpecker
+has earned the names Orange Borer and Orange
+Sapsucker because he eats oranges. It is true<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[66]</a></span>
+that he is not charged with doing damage, because
+he attacks only the over-ripe and unmarketable
+fruit; it is known that the habit is not
+general yet, for even where the birds are abundant
+only a single bird or a pair will be found
+eating oranges, and always the same pair, proving
+that it is a habit not yet learned by all of
+the species; close observers declare, too, that it is
+but a few years since the bird took up the habit;
+and, finally, we know that this must be the case,
+for, though the wild orange was introduced by
+the Spaniards, the sweet fruit was not extensively
+cultivated until recently. Here is a habit
+which undoubtedly has been acquired within
+twenty years or so, which will in all probability
+increase until instead of being the exception it
+is the rule.</p>
+
+<p>Why may not the red-head&rsquo;s occasional cannibalism,
+unless this is mere individual degeneracy,
+and his more common custom of hoarding
+be habits that he is acquiring? Why, indeed,
+may not the Californian woodpecker&rsquo;s distinguishing
+trait be a habit which began like these
+among a few birds here and there, wiser or more
+progressive than the rest, and which in time
+became general and established? Why may not
+the two observed instances of the Lewis&rsquo;s woodpecker
+be examples of a similar habit just beginning?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[67]</a></span>
+The very differences in their methods
+point to that explanation. The Lewis&rsquo;s woodpecker
+that had seen the Carpenter&rsquo;s work tried
+to imitate him; the one that lived outside his
+range adopted a way of his own, unnoticed before
+among woodpeckers, and shelled and quartered
+his nuts before he stored them.</p>
+
+<p>It is remarkable that these four woodpeckers
+are cousins; they belong to the same genus,
+and they have essentially the same structure,
+tastes, and habits. Why should it be strange if
+their minds were alike too? if they had a natural
+bent toward accumulativeness, and a natural
+desire to try new wrinkles? We are sure that
+one of them has acquired a new habit within a
+few years. Why may we not suppose as a basis
+and a spur to further investigation that the
+others also are acquiring ways new and strange?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[68]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>XI</h2>
+
+<h3>THE WOODPECKER&rsquo;S TOOLS: HIS BILL</h3>
+
+
+<p>There is an old saying, &ldquo;You may know a
+carpenter by his chips;&rdquo; but, though chips are
+seldom long absent when a woodpecker is about,
+can we call the woodpecker a carpenter? Is he
+not both in his works and ways of working&mdash;with
+the one exception of the Californian woodpecker&mdash;more
+of a miner?</p>
+
+<p>For the carpenter takes pieces of wood, bit
+by bit, and joins them together till at last he
+has built a lofty skeleton or framework for his
+dwelling, which last of all he covers over and
+closes in; and the tools he uses are saw and
+hammer. With these alone he could build his
+house, though it might be neither very large
+nor very good. When a carpenter&rsquo;s house is
+finished, it is neither a cave nor a hole, but a
+pavilion built in the open air after the model
+of a spreading tree,&mdash;which frames a roof with
+its branches and shingles it with overlapping
+leaves. There is nothing in the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+way of building which corresponds to that.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[69]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>Quite different are the miner&rsquo;s methods. In the
+West, where the barren mountain sides stretch
+up into snowclad summits, on the face of slopes
+as seamed and gray and verdureless as the
+wrinkled trunk of an aged oak, I have seen
+holes where human woodpeckers burrow. The
+entrance to a mine half-way up a hillside looks
+strikingly like a woodpecker&rsquo;s hole and scarcely
+larger. Nor does the likeness vanish as we
+think how in their long tunnels inside their
+mountains of gold and iron and silver the delving
+miners are picking and prying and picking
+to lengthen their burrows just as the woodpeckers
+peck and pry and peck inside their wooden
+mountain, the tree-trunk. Which shall we call
+the woodpecker&mdash;a carpenter or a miner?</p>
+
+<p>What are the miner&rsquo;s tools? Pick and drill,
+are they not? What are the woodpecker&rsquo;s?
+The same. Certainly we shall see, if we stop to
+think, that it is not a chisel that he uses, as we
+sometimes say. A chisel is a knife driven by
+blows of a hammer; like a knife its effectiveness
+depends upon the sharpness and length of
+its cutting edge. But a woodpecker&rsquo;s bill is not
+a cutting tool. It is a wedge, but a wedge working
+on a different principle from a knife-edge.
+Look at this one and observe that, though strong
+and stout, it is not sharp and has no true cutting<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[70]</a></span>
+edge. It is a tapering, square-ended, flat-sided
+tool, rather six-sided at the base and
+holding its bevel and angles to the tip. The
+woodpecker&rsquo;s bill is a pick, not a chisel. It is
+used like a pick, being driven home with a heavy
+blow and getting its efficiency from its own
+weight and wedge-shape and from the force with
+which it is impelled. Watch the downy woodpecker
+at his work and see what sturdy blows
+he delivers, pausing after each one to aim and
+drive home another telling stroke. This is pick-axe
+work. But sometimes he rattles off a succession
+of taps so short and quick that they
+blend together in one continuous drumming, too<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[71]</a></span>
+light and quick to be likened to the ponderous
+swing of the pick-axe. Now he is drilling. The
+work of a drill is to cut out a small deep hole
+either by twirling (as in drilling metals) or by
+tapping (as in drilling stone). The woodpecker
+drills by the latter method and there is a curious
+likeness between his bill and the mason&rsquo;s tools.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_011.jpg" alt="Head of Ivory-billed Woodpecker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Head of Ivory-billed Woodpecker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>Any one who has lived in a granite country
+knows the deep round holes that stone masons
+make when they split rock. Did you ever wonder
+why they are as large at the bottom as at
+the top? If you remember the shape of a mason&rsquo;s
+drill, you will recollect that it looks a little
+like a stick of home-made molasses candy bitten
+off when it was just soft enough to stretch a
+little. The mason&rsquo;s drill is a round iron rod
+with a thin, flat end, sharpened on the edge and
+a little pointed in the centre. In the flattening
+of the sides and the width across the tip its
+end resembles that of a typical woodpecker&rsquo;s
+bill. The woodpeckers that drill for grubs, especially
+the largest, the logcock and the ivory-billed
+woodpecker, have the tip remarkably flattened.
+The likeness to the drill does not go
+farther because the woodpecker&rsquo;s bill is a combination
+tool; but it is drill-pointed rather than
+pick-pointed.</p>
+
+<p>What is the advantage of this compressed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[72]</a></span>
+tip? Can the bird pick as well as he could
+with a sharp point? The bird and the mason
+reap the same benefit from this form of tool.
+A sharp-pointed drill would bind in the hole
+and could neither be driven ahead nor removed
+without difficulty, but the sharp-edged tool cuts
+a hole as wide as the instrument. There is, of
+course, some difference between working in stone
+and in wood, but the principle is the same. The
+mason strikes his drill with his hammer and cuts
+a crease in the stone; then lifts and turns the
+drill, cutting a crease in another direction; and
+so by continually changing the direction of the
+cuts until they radiate from a centre like the
+spokes of a wheel, he finally reduces a little
+circle of stone to a powder fine enough to be
+blown out of the hole. In drilling for a grub
+the woodpecker must do much the same thing.
+He wishes to keep his hole small at the top so
+as to save work, yet it must be large enough
+at the bottom to admit the borer when nipped
+between his mandibles; therefore he needs an
+instrument that, like a drill or a chisel, will cut
+a straight-sided hole. Indeed, we might call it
+a chisel just as well if it were not a double-wedge
+instead of a single wedge and if it did
+not move when it is struck instead of being
+held stationary beneath the blows.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[73]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>When he is digging his house the woodpecker
+uses his bill as a pick-axe. When he is digging for
+grubs he uses it as a drill. Now some species
+drill very little and some a great deal, according
+to the number of grubs they feed on; but
+all dig holes to nest in,&mdash;that is, all use their
+bills as picks but only a few employ them as
+drills. The flickers, for example, seldom drill
+for grubs, their food being picked up on the surface
+or dug from the earth; yet they excavate
+the deepest, roomiest holes made by any woodpeckers
+of their size; they use their bills effectively
+as pick-axes, but seldom, very seldom, as
+drills. And what do we find? No drill-point&mdash;not
+a truncate, compressed bill fit for drilling,
+but a sharper, pointed, rounded, <i>curving</i> bill.
+Notice the ordinary pick-axe and see how much
+nearer the flicker&rsquo;s bill than the logcock&rsquo;s or the
+ivory-billed woodpecker&rsquo;s it is. Why is a flicker&rsquo;s
+bill better for being curved also? Why do the
+drilling woodpeckers have a perfectly straight
+bill? We should find by studying the birds
+and their food that there is a direct relation
+between the shape of the bill and the amount of
+drilling a woodpecker does; that the grub-eating
+or drilling woodpeckers have a straight bill, for
+working in small deep holes, while the flickers
+have a curved bill for prying out chips. And<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[74]</a></span>
+we should note that the flicker&rsquo;s bill is most like
+the ordinary bill of perching birds, while the
+drilling bill, as typified by the logcock&rsquo;s and
+the hairy woodpecker&rsquo;s bills, is a more specialized
+tool, limited to fewer uses, but more effective
+within its limits.</p>
+
+<p>There is another detail of the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+bills which casts light upon their habits. The
+species that drill most have their nostrils closely
+covered by little tufts of stiff feathers, scarcely
+more than bristles, which turn forward over the
+nostril. The density and the length of these
+tufts agree very well with the kind of work the
+woodpecker does; for in the hairy and the downy,
+which are continually drilling and raising a dust
+in rotten wood, they are very thick and noticeable,
+while in the red-head and the sapsucker they
+show as scarcely more than a few loose bristles,
+and in the flicker they barely cover the nostril.
+This seems a plain provision to keep the dust
+out of the bird&rsquo;s lungs; and we might cite as
+additional evidence the fact that the only other
+birds of similar tree-pecking habits, the nuthatches
+and the chickadees, have their nostrils
+protected in the same way. But we must always
+be cautious before drawing inferences of
+this sort to see what may be said on the other
+side. When we recollect that the crows and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[75]</a></span>
+ravens and many kinds of finches, among other
+birds, none of which dig in the bark of trees or
+raise a dust, have their nostrils as completely
+covered, we see that we have perhaps discovered
+a <i>use</i> for these nasal tufts but not the <i>cause</i> of
+their being there. We must be careful not to
+mistake cause and accompaniment in our endeavor
+to explain differences in structure.</p>
+
+<p>Let us see what we have learned and how to
+interpret it:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p>That the woodpecker&rsquo;s bill is a combination of
+drill and pick-axe.</p>
+
+<p>That the shape varies with the use to which it
+is most commonly put.</p>
+
+<p>That the use varies with the food principally
+eaten; or, what is a step farther back, that the
+different kinds of food must be sought in different
+places and by different methods, and therefore
+require different tools.</p>
+
+<p>Therefore the shape of the woodpecker&rsquo;s bill
+has a direct relation to the kind of food he eats.
+Please notice that we do not assert that it <i>causes</i>
+him to eat a certain kind of food nor that a certain
+diet may not have affected the shape of the
+bill, causing it to be what we now see. Both
+may be at least partially true, but to prove
+either or both would need profound study, and
+all that we have observed is that the shape of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[76]</a></span>
+the woodpecker&rsquo;s bill is <i>adapted</i> to his food and
+that it varies with the kind of food he eats,
+or, to be more exact, with his ways of procuring
+it.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[77]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>XII</h2>
+
+<h3>THE WOODPECKER&rsquo;S TOOLS: HIS FOOT</h3>
+
+
+<p>We have studied the woodpecker&rsquo;s bill and
+have found that it is a very serviceable tool. We
+shall find that his feet are equally well adapted
+to their work.</p>
+
+<p>Here is the foot of a woodpecker. Observe
+how it differs from a chicken&rsquo;s foot,
+or a sparrow&rsquo;s foot. What is it
+that especially fits it for climbing?
+Perhaps you will notice that the
+tarsus is short, and you may be able
+to explain why it would be a disadvantage
+for a climbing bird to
+have long legs, as well as why it is
+a help for him to have long toes. Toes long
+and legs short is the rule with the woodpeckers.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_012.jpg" class="wide1" alt="Foot of Woodpecker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Foot of Woodpecker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>I never see a woodpecker&rsquo;s foot without thinking
+of an iceman&rsquo;s nippers with their short
+handles and long, sharp-toothed jaws. They are
+designed for similar uses,&mdash;to lift heavy weights
+by laying hold of smooth, flat surfaces. The
+iceman sets his nippers into the ice and lifts the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[78]</a></span>
+block; but the bird sets his claws into the tree
+and lifts his own body.</p>
+
+<p>Suppose the nippers had one short jaw and one
+long one, would they then take as firm hold as
+they do with jaws of equal length? In perching
+birds the hind toe is much the shortest, but
+they sit balanced upon a limb and have merely
+to hold themselves in position. The woodpecker
+climbing a tree-trunk is out of balance;
+he would fall off unless he had a firm grip;
+and he could not get this firm hold if his hind
+toes were not long enough to give his foot a
+nearly equal spread back and forward. Other
+birds grasp a limb with the whole under surface
+of their toes, but the woodpecker when on a
+smooth, upright tree-trunk nips it only with his
+toenails. Try with your own hand to hold a
+stick as large and heavy as you can grasp, and
+you will see that when you clasp your hand
+around it as a perching bird takes hold of a
+perch, it makes little difference that the thumb
+is shorter than the fingers, but when you try to
+nip it with your finger tips alone, you must bend
+your fingers until they are not much longer than
+your thumb,&mdash;that is, a pair of nippers must be
+equal jawed.</p>
+
+<p>This simple illustration shows why the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+foot reaches as far backward as forward.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[79]</a></span>
+But a sensible objection may be raised,
+namely, that as there are two hind toes of unequal
+length, it is by no means certain which is
+the more necessary.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_013.jpg" class="wide1" alt="Diagram of right foot." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Diagram of right foot.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>Scientists tell us that a woodpecker&rsquo;s foot,
+though it looks so unlike a chicken&rsquo;s, is really
+very much the same. When we ask how one
+of the front toes disappeared and
+how the extra hind toe came to be
+where it is, they tell us that there
+has been no addition and no loss,
+but the extra hind toe is only a
+front toe turned backward. They
+call it a <i>reversed fourth toe</i>. A
+bird&rsquo;s toes are numbered in order
+starting with the hind toe and going
+around the <i>inside</i> of the foot
+to the outer or fourth toe. The hind toe is the
+thumb, and the others are numbered in the same
+order as the fingers of our hands. So we see
+that the woodpecker&rsquo;s real hind toe is rather
+small, like that of most birds. It looks very
+much as if it had been found <i>too</i> small and as if
+another had turned back to help it do its work.
+Do you say that a bird cannot turn his toes
+about in this way? Most cannot, to be sure,
+but all of the owls can do it. An owl will sit
+either with two toes forward and two backward,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[80]</a></span>
+or with three forward and one the other way.
+The owls have a reversible outer toe, and perhaps
+the woodpeckers did also before it became
+permanently reversed.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_014.jpg" alt="Foot of Three-toed Woodpecker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Foot of Three-toed Woodpecker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>That this is exactly what had happened is curiously
+confirmed. There are a few woodpeckers
+in this country which have but three toes. They
+are the only North
+American land birds
+with less than four toes
+(though many sea and
+shore birds have but
+three). Compare this
+picture with a four-toed woodpecker&rsquo;s foot. One
+toe is gone completely, when or how no one can
+tell. But in some way the <i>first</i> toe, the <i>thumb</i>,
+the one we always begin to count from, has disappeared.
+The one left is the reversed fourth
+toe, as we know by the number of joints in it.
+Undoubtedly this woodpecker needed a hind toe,
+but he must have needed a longer, stronger one
+than his natural first toe. A toe of the right
+length was supplied by turning one of the front
+toes back, and the short hind toe in some way
+disappeared.</p>
+
+<p>This may seem a roundabout way to show
+that a woodpecker&rsquo;s foot is a pair of nippers.
+First we studied nippers till we found out that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[81]</a></span>
+they were not good nippers unless they were
+nearly equal-limbed. Next we studied the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+foot to learn about that extra hind toe.
+Then it occurred to us that four toes were not
+necessary, since some of our best climbers have
+but three. What was the essential point?
+Might it not be a foot equally divided without
+reference to the number of toes? But that is
+the principle of a pair of nippers. Then came
+the question, is there any similarity in their use?
+Yes, the nippers are used to lift heavy weights,
+and the woodpecker&rsquo;s foot is used to lift his
+heavy body in just the same way, by taking
+hold of a flat, smooth surface. We conclude
+that a wide-spread, equally divided, nipping foot
+would be the best device possible for the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+way of living, and we find by examination
+that every woodpecker shows this type of
+foot.</p>
+
+<p>There is additional evidence that this is the
+right explanation. Our only other North American
+birds that climb on the bark of trees professionally,
+as we may say, are the brown creepers
+and the nuthatches. In both these the tarsus is
+short, as we found it in the woodpeckers, and
+the hind toe and its claw are fully equal to the
+middle toe and claw, making an equally divided
+foot. On the other hand, the foot with two toes<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[82]</a></span>
+forward and two toes backward is confined neither
+to woodpeckers nor to climbing birds. The
+parrots, which climb after a fashion, have it;
+but so do the cuckoos, which do not climb, some
+of which, like our road-runner, or ground cuckoo
+of the West, are strictly terrestrial. The &ldquo;yoking&rdquo;
+of the toes may occur by the reversion of
+the fourth toe, as ordinarily, or of the second
+toe, as in the trogons; the arrangement appears
+to be definitely related to the distribution of the
+tendons that control the toes. But though accounting
+for the structure may give a clue to its
+descent, it does not justify its efficiency. The
+yoke-toed foot is not exclusively a climbing foot.
+All our families of climbers have at least one
+representative with but one toe behind, and this
+clearly proves that the yoke-toed structure is by
+no means necessary even though it may be an
+honorable inheritance among climbers. The
+natural conclusion is that the important point in
+climbing is not the number nor the arrangement
+of the toes, but the length of at least one hind
+toe so as to give an equally divided foot.</p>
+
+<p>There is an interesting point to notice about
+the woodpeckers. This reversed fourth toe is
+curiously variable in length. In the flickers,
+with its claw, it is a little shorter than the middle
+(third) toe with its claw; in the red-heads and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[83]</a></span>
+their friends it a little exceeds the middle toe
+and claw; in the downy and the hairy it is much
+the longest toe, and in the ivory-billed woodpecker
+it is abnormally developed. We at once
+judge that it is some indication of the bird&rsquo;s
+manner of life, and we look for it to be largest
+in the species that live continually upon the
+trunks of trees, obtaining most of their food by
+drilling. We expect to see the finest development
+of drilling bill accompany this enormously
+developed toe, and we find them both in the
+ivory-billed woodpecker. In imagination we
+clearly see the use of it. The great bird, keen
+in his quest of grubs, sidling hastily round the
+tree, in an unsteady balance and unsupported by
+his tail, throws one long hind toe downward
+to steady himself, hooks the other into the bark
+above him, and hangs between the two as firmly
+supported as in his ordinary position. No doubt
+he does do this, but does it prove the supposition
+that the heaviest and most arboreal woodpeckers
+have the greatest development of the
+fourth toe? Not at all. There is our rare acquaintance
+the logcock, or pileated woodpecker,
+a bird nearly as large as the ivory-billed, one of
+the most persistent of our tree-climbers and more
+than any other woodpecker I ever observed given
+to scratching rapidly round and round a tree-trunk,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[84]</a></span>
+clinging at ease in almost any position
+except head-downward, and drilling incessantly
+and at all seasons for grubs; he is a typical
+woodpecker of the largest size, but his hind toe
+and claw are, if anything, a trifle shorter than
+his middle toe with its claw. He throws it out
+and uses it as we have described, but it has not
+that disproportion to the other toes which we
+expected to find as the result of a strictly arboreal
+life.</p>
+
+<p>What have we proved? We have not shown
+that the long toe is <i>not</i> more useful than the
+shorter one,&mdash;that is a matter of observation;
+but we have failed entirely to show that it is so,
+and this can be done only in one of two ways:
+either by proving that the logcock&rsquo;s habits are
+not what all previous observers have believed
+them to be,&mdash;which would be assuming a great
+burden of proof; or by demonstrating that his
+ancestry explains why his feet do not illustrate
+our theory,&mdash;and this, though it is undoubtedly
+the true solution, could be settled only by a very
+learned man.</p>
+
+<p>But we have encountered one truth which
+must always be held in mind in science&mdash;that
+a theory is not proved while a single fact remains
+rebellious and unsubdued. We might
+have examined every other woodpecker in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[85]</a></span>
+continent but just one; we might have seen that
+every other one agreed with our theory, as it
+does; we might have supposed that the explanation
+was good past doubting; but that one exception&mdash;if
+it was a logcock&mdash;would still over-turn
+the whole theory; and the very facts that
+we relied upon to strengthen us&mdash;its resemblance
+in size, habits, shape, and color to the
+ivory-billed woodpecker&mdash;have been the strongest
+possible means of totally demolishing our
+fine theory. We have learned, if nothing more,
+that all the facts must be examined and accounted
+for before an explanation is accepted as
+indisputable.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[86]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>XIII</h2>
+
+<h3>THE WOODPECKER&rsquo;S TOOLS: HIS TAIL</h3>
+
+
+<p>If we study the woodpecker&rsquo;s anatomy and
+observe his broad, strong, highly-arched hip-bones
+and the heavy, triangular &ldquo;ploughshare&rdquo;
+bone in which the tail feathers are planted, as
+well as the stiffness and strength of the tail itself,
+we must conclude that it is not by accident
+that he uses his tail as a prop. The whole
+structure shows that the bird was intended &ldquo;to
+lean on his tail.&rdquo; What we wish to discover is
+how good a tail it is to lean on.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_015.jpg" alt="Tail of Hairy Woodpecker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Tail of Hairy Woodpecker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>Our first impression is that the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+tail might be improved.
+Why are
+not the tips of the
+feathers stiffer?
+Why is it so
+rounded? Most of
+the work seems to
+fall on the middle
+feathers, and in
+some species, as the downy and the hairy woodpeckers,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[87]</a></span>
+these end in decurved tips so soft and
+unresisting that they seem quite unfit to give
+any support. Would it not be better if the
+woodpecker&rsquo;s tail had been cut square across
+and made of feathers equally rigid and ending
+in short stiff spines? For we see that the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+tail is not only weak in its inner feathers,
+but weaker still in its outer ones, and it is
+stiff, in most species, only in the upper three
+fourths of its length.</p>
+
+<p>When we propose a change in nature it is
+wise to inquire whether our improvement has
+not been tried before and to learn how it worked.
+How many kinds of birds have we that use
+their tails for a support? What are their habits
+and what sort of tails have they?</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_016.jpg" alt="Tails of Brown Creeper (under surface)
+and Chimney Swift (upper surface.)" title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Tails of Brown Creeper (under surface)
+and Chimney Swift (upper surface.)</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>Besides the woodpeckers we have but two kinds
+of land birds that prop themselves with their tails,&mdash;the
+swifts and
+the creepers. The
+creeper has a tail
+very much like the
+woodpecker&rsquo;s as it
+is; while the chimney
+swift&rsquo;s is precisely
+like the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+as we
+thought it ought to be. But we observe that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[88]</a></span>
+while the creeper&rsquo;s habits are almost precisely
+like the woodpecker&rsquo;s,&mdash;so much so that when
+we first make his acquaintance, some of us will
+be sure we have discovered a new kind of woodpecker,&mdash;the
+chimney swift has but one habit
+in common with the woodpecker, that of clinging
+to an upright surface and propping himself
+by his tail. If the bird with the tail most like
+the woodpecker&rsquo;s has the woodpecker&rsquo;s habits,
+is it not a fair inference that this form of tail is
+better fitted to this way of living than the other
+would be?</p>
+
+<p>Next, what variations in shapes do we observe
+among the woodpeckers themselves? The logcock
+and the ivory-billed woodpecker have the
+longest tails&mdash;because they are the largest
+birds. When we compare the length of the
+tails with the length of the birds we are surprised
+at the results. On measuring sixteen species,
+representing seven genera, I find that the tail is
+from three tenths to thirty-five hundredths of the
+entire length; that it is, in proportion, as long
+in the flicker as in the ivory-bill, as long in the
+downy as in the logcock, and longer (in the
+specimens measured) in the almost wholly terrestrial
+flicker than in the wholly arboreal logcock.
+Without much more study all that we can safely
+infer is that the woodpecker&rsquo;s tail is not far from<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[89]</a></span>
+one third the length of his whole body measured
+from the tip of the bill to the tip of the tail.
+Probably this is the proportion most convenient
+for his work.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_017.jpg" alt="Middle tail feathers of Flicker, Ivory-billed
+Woodpecker, and Hairy Woodpecker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Middle tail feathers of Flicker, Ivory-billed
+Woodpecker, and Hairy Woodpecker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>All woodpeckers&rsquo; tails agree in one particular:
+they are rounded at the end. At first sight we
+would say that some are but slightly rounded
+and others very deeply graduated; but as nearly
+as I can determine this is at least partly an optical
+illusion, explained by the great difference in the
+shape of the feathers making up the tail, which
+in some, as the flicker, are very broad and abruptly
+pointed, and in others taper gradually to
+the end and are very narrow for their length.
+The larger birds naturally appear to have longer
+tails, and the effect of narrow feathers is to
+make the tails appear longer and more sharply
+graduated than they really are. This diagram<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[90]</a></span>
+shows the shape of the curve in six species, and
+indicates that, while the curvature
+is less than we might
+expect, it bears some relation
+to the bird&rsquo;s way of living;
+for we see that the strictly
+arboreal woodpeckers have
+more pointed tails than the
+terrestrial species, and that
+the amount of gradation
+bears a direct relation to the
+amount of time spent upon
+the tree-trunks.</p>
+
+<p>There is a third difference,
+the shape of the individual
+feather, to which we shall refer
+again; but now we wish to
+examine the uses and meaning
+of the curved end.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_018.jpg" class="wide1" alt="" title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Diagram of curvature of
+tails of Woodpeckers.
+Drawn to scale.</span>
+</div>
+
+<div class="blockquot">
+<p>
+<i>a</i>, <i>a</i>, point of insertion in
+rump.<br />
+
+<i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, outer tail feather.<br />
+
+<i>a</i>, <i>c</i>, middle tail feather.<br />
+</p>
+
+<p>If the outer tail feather
+were of the same length in
+all cases, the curve at the end
+of the tail would be represented
+by the dotted lines.</p>
+
+<p>
+1. Flicker.<br />
+
+2. Red-headed Woodpecker.<br />
+
+3. Downy Woodpecker.<br />
+
+4. Logcock.<br />
+
+5. Central American Ivory-billed
+Woodpecker.<br />
+
+6. North American Ivory-billed
+Woodpecker.<br />
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<p>I will show you how to
+prove this point so that you
+may be satisfied about it even
+if you should never see a
+woodpecker. We will make
+a little experiment, so simple
+that even a child can understand it.</p>
+
+<p>First, how many shapes can any bird&rsquo;s tail
+have? It may be one of three general patterns,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[91]</a></span>
+and it can be nothing else unless we combine
+those patterns. It may be square across the
+end, it may have the middle feathers longest,
+or it may have the outer feathers longest. To
+one of these patterns every form of birds&rsquo; tails
+may be referred; you can invent no other shape.</p>
+
+<p>Let us assume that you know nothing whatever
+of a woodpecker&rsquo;s tail except that it has
+ten feathers, is used as a prop, and is held at
+an angle of thirty or forty degrees with the tree-trunk.
+Now, take three strips of paper of the
+same width and length, and of any size not inconveniently
+small. Fold them all down the
+centre. Cut one square across; cut one with a
+rounded end and the third with a forked end,
+making them of any shape you please so long
+as the three papers are of the same length. To
+give our models
+a fair test they
+must be of the
+same width and
+length. Next, pin
+a sheet of paper
+of any size you
+please into the
+form of a cylinder and stand it on end to represent
+a tree-trunk. Then fit the patterns to
+the tree-trunk and see which is the form that
+would give the most support.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_019.jpg" alt="Patterns of tails." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Patterns of tails.</span>
+</div><p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[92]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>But first, in how many ways is it possible for
+a bird to use his tail as a prop? He may of
+course hold it open or closed; and the open tail
+may be held in a single plane, &ldquo;spread flat,&rdquo; as
+we say; or curved up at the edges, like a crow
+blackbird&rsquo;s; or curved down at the edges. And
+the closed tail may be held in a single plane;
+or, by dropping each pair of feathers a little, in
+several planes. Thus we see there are five positions
+in which each shape may be held against
+the cylinder of paper. Try each one against it,
+holding it first in the open positions and then
+after folding the paper like a bird&rsquo;s tail with
+the outer feathers underneath, in the closed positions.
+The size of the model tree-trunk and
+the shape you cut your curves will make the results
+vary a little, but you will be surprised to
+observe, if your models are not too small, how
+many times you will get the same answers.
+Note the number and position of the pairs that
+touch:</p>
+
+<table summary="Using a tail as a prop">
+<tr><td><i>Spread.</i></td><td><i>Square end.</i></td><td><i>Forked end.</i></td><td><i>Round end.</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td>one plane,</td><td>varies</td><td>varies</td><td>middle pair</td></tr>
+<tr><td>curved up,</td><td>middle pair</td><td>middle pair</td><td>middle pair</td></tr>
+<tr><td>curved down,</td><td>all</td><td>all</td><td>all</td></tr>
+<tr><td><i>Closed.</i></td></tr>
+<tr><td>one plane,</td><td>outer pair</td><td>outer pair</td><td>middle pair</td></tr>
+<tr><td>different planes,</td><td>outer pair</td><td>outer pair</td><td>all</td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>Which shape brings the most feathers into use
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[93]</a></span>
+in all positions? Which positions bring most
+feathers into use? We see at once that the
+rounded end has a decided advantage, that the
+middle pair of feathers is used in all possible
+positions, that the pair next outside is the next
+important, and that the spread tail curving
+downward at the edges and the closed tail in different
+planes are the two shapes which give the
+best support. There is therefore a reason for the
+rounded end which we said was the rule among
+the woodpeckers.</p>
+
+<p>Our little experiment is what we call a <i>deduction</i>.
+It shows us what we ought to expect
+under certain imaginary conditions. But it does
+not show us what actually exists, so there often
+comes a time when our deductions are faulty because
+Nature has done some unexpected thing, as
+when we found the single exception of the logcock&rsquo;s
+foot upsetting a fine theory of ours. A
+deduction must always be compared with facts,
+and is worth little or nothing if a single fact of
+the series we are studying is not explained by
+it. This time all the facts do agree; for I had,
+before we made our experiment, examined the
+tails of every species of woodpecker ever found
+in North America, and there was no exception to
+the rounded end. I had already drawn my conclusion<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[94]</a></span>
+that this form was better adapted to life
+on a tree-trunk than the square or the forked
+tail would be, reasoning by a different process
+called <i>induction</i>. An induction examines many,
+and, if possible, all the facts before drawing any
+conclusion; a deduction examines the facts after
+the conclusion is reached. There is no hard-and-fast
+line between the two kinds of reasoning, but
+we may say that a <i>deduction is reasoning out a
+guess and an induction is guessing out a reason</i>.
+Deductions are easier and quicker; inductions
+are surer, and in preparing them we often
+make other discoveries.</p>
+
+<p>The rounded tail is no doubt the best; but
+we have yet to decide whether the sharper curve
+is more advantageous than the lesser curve, as
+we thought probable from our observations.
+And there is still another deduction from our
+experiment which we did not make. If in the
+rounded tail the middle pairs of feathers do most
+of the work, and if use increases the size and
+efficiency of a part, which is almost an axiom in
+science, we should expect to find the middle tail
+feathers not only strongest in all woodpeckers
+but also strongest in increasing ratio in the
+species that use them most. To determine this
+we must study the use of the tail and the structure
+and shape of the individual tail feathers.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[95]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>We should remark, perhaps, that the woodpecker&rsquo;s
+tail is always composed of twelve feathers&mdash;ten
+pointed rectrices and two tiny abortive
+feathers so short and so hidden that no attention
+is paid to them. The ten principal feathers are
+arranged in corresponding pairs numbered from
+the outside to the centre as first, second, third,
+fourth, and fifth pairs.</p>
+
+<p>In the flickers all ten feathers have wide vanes
+and are similar in everything but the shape; all
+are more or less pointed. The flicker&rsquo;s tail looks
+and feels very much like that of any other bird
+except that the shafts are stiffer and the vanes
+contract to an acuminate tip. But as we take
+up the other species we notice a change, not only
+in the shape of the feathers but much more in
+their texture and in the difference between the
+various pairs. While in the flicker four pairs
+out of five are pointed and all are rigid, in
+the downy and the hairy three pairs out of five
+seem to be too soft to give any support, the
+sharp points have disappeared, and the tail has
+lost much of its stiffness. The two middle pairs
+of feathers are the only ones capable of doing
+much work and they are wavering and infirm at
+the tips where we should expect them to be
+strongest. In the logcock it is about the same,&mdash;two
+pairs are apparently unfit for work, one<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[96]</a></span>
+pair is infirm, and the two middle pairs are compelled
+to give all the support, except the little
+contributed by the third pair. In the ivory-billed
+woodpecker the two outer pairs are of no
+assistance and the three central ones do the
+work, and here again we find the base of the
+rectrices rigid and inflexible and the last fourth
+of their length weak and yielding. But what a
+difference in the individual feather! It is well
+able to do all the work; for, except for that weak
+tip which we cannot now explain, it is one of the
+toughest and strongest feathers to be found.
+The shaft is broad and flat, as elastic as a watch-spring;
+it looks like a band of burnished steel
+as it runs down between the vanes. And the
+vanes themselves are of a very curious pattern.
+They curl under at the edges so that we do not
+see their whole width, and the barbs crowd so
+thickly upon each other that they over-lie until
+they present an edge three or four broad. Indeed,
+the under side of one of these tail feathers
+reminds one of nothing so much as of the under
+side of a star-fish&rsquo;s arm with its two long lines
+of ambulacral suckers on each side of a central
+groove, so thickly do the spiny vanes of these
+strong rectrices over ride and crowd together.
+These spines lay hold of the bark of the tree,
+rank after rank, hundreds of bristling points<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[97]</a></span>
+that cannot be dislodged except by a forward
+motion of the bird or by lifting the tail. Compared
+with this, the spiny points on the flicker&rsquo;s
+tail were a poor invention. This device, which
+takes hold like a wool card, or a wire hair-brush,
+cannot slip from place. We begin to see, too, the
+use of that weak and flexible tip; it is to press
+down upon the tree-trunk a flat surface sufficiently
+large to hold hundreds of these little
+spiny points against the bark. The ivory-bill
+braces against this with the stiff upper part of
+the shaft and has a support that will not slip.
+The upper part of the shaft acts like a spring
+also, and adds tremendous force to the blow
+of the bill. Watch a hairy woodpecker when
+hard at work and see how his legs and tail
+form a triangular base by bracing against each
+other, and how his blow is delivered, not with
+the head alone, but with the whole body, swinging
+from the hips, the apex of the triangle on
+which he rests. He swings like a man wielding
+a sledge hammer, and to the strength of his neck
+adds the weight of his body, the spring of his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[98]</a></span>
+tail, and the momentum of a blow delivered from
+a greater height. When the little hairy woodpecker
+does so much with his weak body, we can
+imagine what great birds like the logcock and
+the ivory-billed woodpecker, with their tremendous
+beaks, their huge claws, their springy tails,
+and their great physical strength can do. They
+are magnificent birds, the terror of all the grubs
+that hide in tree-trunks.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_020.jpg" alt="Under side of middle tail feather of
+Ivory-billed Woodpecker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Under side of middle tail feather of
+Ivory-billed Woodpecker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>One point we have left unexplained: What
+is the advantage, if there is any, in the sharper
+curve to the tails of the arboreal woodpeckers?
+It is a simple question. The curve is caused by
+the unequal length of the tail feathers; each
+tail feather is a prop, and by their inequality
+they become props of different lengths. Now
+ask any carpenter which will best support a
+tottering wall&mdash;props all of the same length
+set at the same angle, or props of different
+lengths set at different angles? His answer
+will help you to solve the problem. But if a
+little is good, why are not all the pairs used as
+props? Partly, perhaps, because the woodpecker
+is always crowded for houseroom, and while he
+must have tail enough, he cannot afford to have
+any which he does not use. Did you ever think
+what an inconvenience any tail at all must be in
+a woodpecker&rsquo;s hole?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[99]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>XIV</h2>
+
+<h3>THE WOODPECKER&rsquo;S TOOLS: HIS TONGUE</h3>
+
+
+<p>We have seen how the woodpecker spears his
+grubs: now we will study his spear.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_021.jpg" class="wide0" alt="Tongue of Hairy Woodpecker. (After Lucas.)" title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Tongue of Hairy Woodpecker. (After Lucas.)</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>There are many interesting points
+about a woodpecker&rsquo;s tongue, and they
+are not hard to understand. If a woodpecker
+would kindly let us take hold of
+his tongue and pull it out to its full extent
+we should be afraid we were &ldquo;spoiling
+his machinery,&rdquo; for the tongue can
+be drawn out almost incredibly&mdash;between
+two and three inches in a hairy
+woodpecker and more in a flicker. A
+strange-looking object it is, much resembling
+an angle-worm in form, color,
+and feeling; for it is round, soft, and
+sticky, except at the flat, horny, bayonet-pointed
+tip, and as it lies in the mouth it
+is wrinkled like the wrist of a loose glove;
+but it grows smaller and smoother the more we
+pull it out. Evidently we are only drawing it
+into its skin. But where does so much tongue<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[100]</a></span>
+come from? Does it stretch like a piece of
+elastic cord? Or is a part hidden somewhere?
+And if so, where is it kept?</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_022.jpg" alt="Tongue-bones of Flicker. (After Lucas.)" title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Tongue-bones of Flicker. (After Lucas.)</span>
+</div>
+
+<div class="blockquot">
+<p>
+<i>a.</i> Cerato-hyals, fused and short.<br />
+<i>b.</i> Basi-hyal, long, slender.<br />
+<i>c.</i> Cerato-branchials.<br />
+<i>d.</i> Epibranchials.<br />
+Basi-branchial is wanting.<br />
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<p>These questions are answered by studying the
+bones of the tongue, for without bones it could
+not be guided as swiftly and surely as it is. Indeed,
+all tongues have bones in them, as you will
+discover by cutting carefully the slices near the
+root of an ox-tongue; but no other creature
+has such long and elaborate tongue-bones as
+some of the woodpeckers. They are the slenderest
+and most delicate
+little bony rods,
+joined end to end,
+but not really hinged
+nor needing to be,
+because they are so
+elastic. Here are the
+bones of a flicker&rsquo;s
+tongue. The little
+knob at the end,
+marked <i>a</i>, bore the
+horny point of the
+tongue and directed
+it; the straight shaft
+marked <i>b</i> was inside
+the round part of the
+tongue as it lay within the bird&rsquo;s mouth; but<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[101]</a></span>
+what was done with these two long branches,
+fully three quarters of the entire length of the
+bones? They are too sharply curved to pass
+down the bird&rsquo;s throat, and, not being jointed,
+they cannot be doubled back in his mouth.
+They were
+tucked away
+very neatly
+and curiously.
+As the hyoid
+or tongue-bone
+lies in the
+mouth its
+branches diverge just in front of the gullet, and,
+traveling along the inner sides of the fork of
+the lower jaw, pass up over the top of the skull,
+looking in their sheath of muscles like two tiny
+whipcords. But still the bones are too long by
+perhaps half an inch for the place they occupy,
+and the ends must be neatly disposed of. Usually
+both pass to the right nasal opening and
+along the hollow of the upper mandible. Very
+rarely they may curl down around the eyeball in
+a spiral spring. So when the flicker thrusts out
+his tongue he feels the pull in the end of his
+nose, for the tip of the tongue being run out, the
+long slender bones are drawn out of their hiding-places,
+down over the skull until they lie flat<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[102]</a></span>
+along the roof of his mouth. As soon as he
+wishes to shut his bill, back fly the little bones
+guided by their hollow sheaths of elastic muscle
+into their hiding-place in the top of the bill.
+The muscular covering is a part of the same soft
+envelope that we saw lying in wrinkles at the
+root of the tongue. It covers the whole length<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[103]</a></span>
+of the little bones just as the woven outside
+covers an elastic cord.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_023.jpg" alt="Skull of Woodpecker, showing bones of tongue.
+a. Upper end of windpipe and gullet." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Skull of Woodpecker, showing bones of tongue.</span>
+</div>
+<div class="blockquot">
+<p><i>a.</i> Upper end of windpipe and gullet.</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_024.jpg" class="wide2" alt="Hyoids of Sapsucker and Golden-fronted Woodpecker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Hyoids of Sapsucker and Golden-fronted Woodpecker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<p>Not all woodpeckers have tongues precisely
+like this. The sapsucker&rsquo;s is the shortest of any,
+and reaches barely beyond the hinge of the
+jaws. In the Lewis&rsquo;s woodpecker and others of
+his genus the branches of the hyoid extend part-way
+up the back of the skull but in the kinds
+that live principally upon borers they are very
+long and resemble the flicker&rsquo;s in arrangement.
+The only other North American birds that have
+a tongue built upon this plan are the hummingbirds,
+in which also it is extensile. The flicker,
+in proportion to his size, has the longest tongue
+of any bird known.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[104]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>XV</h2>
+
+<h3>HOW EACH WOODPECKER IS FITTED FOR HIS
+OWN KIND OF LIFE</h3>
+
+
+<p>We have studied the woodpeckers at some
+length: first, what all of them do; next, what
+some that are peculiar in their ways do; lastly,
+how each is fitted for a particular kind of life.
+At first we were inclined to think they were all
+alike; but now we begin to see that there are
+very real differences between them,&mdash;in tails,
+feet, bills, and tongues, and at the same time in
+their food and habits.</p>
+
+<p>The flicker&rsquo;s tail is less sharply curved than
+that of any other woodpecker,&mdash;a sign that he
+is probably not exclusively a tree-dweller; his
+bill is curved and rounded, a pick-axe rather than
+a drill,&mdash;an indication that he does not dig for
+grubs; his feet do not tell us much; but his
+long extensile tongue shows that, whatever he
+feeds upon, he seeks it in holes. We find a
+tongue like this in no other bird, but among
+mammals the aard-vark, the ant-bear, and the
+pangolins are all similarly equipped, and all live<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[105]</a></span>
+on ants which they extract from their mounds and
+burrows in hundreds by means of these round,
+sticky, and extensile tongues. This is precisely
+the way the flicker gets his living. He lives
+principally upon the ground or near it, pecks
+very little except when digging his nest, and
+feeds largely upon ants, thrusting his head into
+the ant-hills and drawing out the ants glued to
+his tongue rather than speared by it. As he
+has been known to eat three thousand ants for a
+meal, we see how much easier this is than spearing
+them one by one.</p>
+
+<p>The red-head is another type. The bill is
+still nearly of the pick-axe model, the feet not
+especially different from the flicker&rsquo;s, the tail
+rather better adapted to life on a tree-trunk, and
+the tongue entirely unlike the flicker&rsquo;s,&mdash;not
+very extensile and heavily clothed near the tip
+with long, thick, recurved bristles. We infer
+that though he may climb well, he is not a drilling
+woodpecker to any great extent, and that
+his tongue is adapted neither to extracting borers
+nor to eating ants from their burrows. His
+habits bear out the inference. He is arboreal,
+but his food is either vegetable or picked up
+from the surface, rasped up rather than speared.</p>
+
+<p>The sapsucker presents still another variation.
+The points to the tail feathers are more acuminate<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[106]</a></span>
+and the tail itself more resembles that of
+the tree-dwelling woodpeckers in shape; the feet
+are fitted for clinging to the trunk; the bill,
+now perfectly straight and no longer smoothly
+rounded but buttressed by strong angles that
+spring from the base and run down toward the
+tip, is the bill of a woodpecker that lives by
+drilling; but the tongue is wholly unadapted
+to catching grubs. What kind of food can an
+arboreal woodpecker with a drilling bill find
+upon a tree-trunk when his tongue can be extended
+only a fifth of an inch, and is furnished
+with a brush of bristles at the end? We have
+answered that question before: he eats the inner
+bark of trees and laps up the sap, for which
+this brushy tip is excellently fitted. It has been
+observed that the tongue much resembles the
+tongues of insect-eating birds, which cannot be
+extended beyond the end of the bill. It is true
+that the sapsucker catches great numbers of insects,
+taking them on the wing like a flycatcher.
+But he also eats nearly as many ants as the
+flicker, though their tongues are totally unlike.
+We have made the mistake perhaps of thinking
+that ants live only underground and can be
+obtained only by tongues like those of the
+flicker and the ant-bear, which hunt them there.
+But ants are abundant on the surface of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[107]</a></span>
+ground, and they excavate long tunnels in rotten
+wood. The black bear is a famous ant-hunter,
+yet his tongue is like a dog&rsquo;s and he gets
+his ants by lapping them up after he has torn
+open the rotten logs in which they live. This
+is the way that the sapsucker obtains his ants,
+and the brush of stiff hairs is a help to him in
+such work. We see, then, that it is not so
+much the food as the manner of feeding that
+explains the form of the tongue.</p>
+
+<p>The downy and the hairy are a step farther
+along in their development. The fourth toe is
+longer than the others, a condition that we do
+not find in any of the woodpeckers not strictly
+arboreal; the tail is of the improved pattern,
+holding by a brush of bristles rather than by one
+stiff point at the end of each feather; the bill is
+heavier, broader at the base, more heavily ridged,
+and in every way a stronger tool; and the tongue
+is highly extensible and of the spear pattern,
+sharp-pointed and barbed with recurved hooks.
+Everything about these birds indicates that they
+are fitted to live on tree-trunks and to dig for
+borers. This, indeed, is what they do.</p>
+
+<p>But the great logcock and the ivory-billed
+woodpecker, though of the same type as the
+other larv&aelig;-eating woodpeckers, are more highly
+developed along the same line. We notice the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[108]</a></span>
+great strength of the feet; the claws, as large
+and as sharp as a cat&rsquo;s; the enormous weight
+and strength of the bill, compared with that of
+the other woodpeckers, which enables them to
+cut into the hardest wood and even into frozen
+green timber; and the great development of the
+tail, which now becomes a strong spring to support
+and aid the bird in his work.</p>
+
+<p>As we try to group these particulars under
+general heads, we see that we have observed
+three things:&mdash;</p>
+
+<p><i>That the structure of a bird is adapted to its
+kind of life.</i></p>
+
+<p><i>That the structure varies by small degrees
+with the kind of life.</i></p>
+
+<p><i>That the kind of life is conditioned largely
+upon the kind of food and upon the method of
+procuring it, more particularly the latter.</i></p>
+
+<p>These are not so much different truths as
+three aspects of one truth. When we study the
+first we see why birds are grouped together into
+orders and families: we study their resemblances.
+When we observe the second we see
+why they are divided into species, for we note
+their differences. But when we consider the
+third and reflect that birds have the power to
+choose new kinds of food or new places and
+means of getting it, we see how it is that there<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[109]</a></span>
+can come to be new kinds of birds, new subspecies
+and species, springing up from time to
+time. Wonderful and improbable as it seems,
+there is more reason to believe than there is to
+doubt that new kinds of animals and plants are
+constantly in process of making; that the laws
+of change are constantly at work, adapting creatures
+to their surroundings or crushing them
+out of existence because they will not learn new
+ways. And it is probable that these differences
+which we mark in the woodpeckers have been
+the result of efforts to adapt themselves to a
+peculiar kind of life where food was abundant;
+and also that by acquired habits and by acquired
+tastes for different kinds of foods they will be
+subject to still further variations in the future.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[110]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>XVI</h2>
+
+<h3>THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN</h3>
+
+
+<p>But if the birds are making themselves into
+new species, where is the place for God in the
+universe? Did not God make all kinds of creatures
+in the beginning? How can they go on
+being made without God?</p>
+
+<p>These are questions every one ought to ask,
+but&mdash;did God leave his world after He had
+made it and go a long way off? Did He wind
+it up like a watch to go till it should run down?
+Is the world a machine, or is it alive?</p>
+
+<p>Long ago the wise and good man Socrates
+argued that if you did not know there was a
+God at all, you could at least infer it because
+everything was so wonderfully made. &ldquo;There
+is our body,&rdquo; said he: &ldquo;every part of it so perfect
+and so reasonable. Consider how the eyes
+not only please us with agreeable sensations but
+are protected in every way. The eyebrows stand
+like a thicket to keep the perspiration from them,
+the lids are a curtain to shut out too great light,
+the lashes screen them from dust,&mdash;everything<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[111]</a></span>
+is planned for some wise and reasonable end.
+And where the evidence of design is so convincing
+must we not believe that there was a Designer?&rdquo;
+Words like these he spoke, and we
+know because everything is so perfectly contrived
+that there must have been a contriver,
+who knew all from the beginning. We are compelled
+to believe that there is a God.</p>
+
+<p>Shall we believe it less because we find in the
+creatures about us intelligence and the power to
+care for their own lives? Has God gone on a
+visit because these living creatures are looking
+out for themselves? Were they made less perfectly
+in the beginning because when new conditions
+surround them they are able to change
+to meet the strange requirements? This is not
+less evidence of a Designer, but more. It was
+long said that the existence of a watch was
+proof of a watchmaker who had planned and
+put together all the parts so that they worked
+harmoniously. But if the watch had the power
+to grow small to fit a small pocket, or large to
+fit a large one, to become luminous by night,
+and to correct its own time by the sun instead
+of being regulated by outside interference, what
+should we have said&mdash;that it was proof there
+was no watchmaker? or that it showed a far
+more skillful one, since he could make a living,
+self-regulating, adaptive watch?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[112]</a></span></p>
+
+<p>And so of the world and the creatures in it.
+Every evidence we get that they can care for
+themselves, that they can adapt themselves to
+new conditions, that they are intelligent and
+reasonable, capable of improvement in habits or
+in structure, is so much surer proof that a wise
+God made them what they are. Evolution&mdash;for
+that is the name by which we call these
+changes&mdash;does not take God out of the universe
+but makes the need of Him stronger.
+The argument from design is immensely
+strengthened when we consider that we have
+not only an obedient machine acting according
+to a few fundamental rules, but one that is intelligent
+also and capable of self-modification.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[113]</a></span></p>
+
+
+
+<hr />
+<h2>APPENDIX</h2>
+
+<h3><i>Explanation of Terms.</i></h3>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+<img src="images/fig_025.jpg" alt="Head of a Flicker." title="" />
+<br />
+<span class="caption">Head of a Flicker.</span>
+</div>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p><i>Occipital</i> means &ldquo;on the occiput.&rdquo;</p>
+<p><i>a.</i> Forehead; <i>b.</i> crown; <i>c.</i> occiput; <i>d.</i> nape; <i>e.</i> chin; <i>f.</i> throat;
+<i>g.</i> jaw-patch, or mustache.</p>
+
+<p><i>Nuchal</i> means &ldquo;on the nape.&rdquo;</p>
+
+<p><i>Primaries</i> are the nine or ten wing-quills borne upon the last
+joint of the wing.</p>
+
+<p><i>Secondaries</i> are the wing-quills attached to the fore-arm bones.</p>
+
+<p><i>Tertiaries</i> are the wing-quills springing from the upper arm
+bones.</p>
+
+<p><i>Wing coverts</i> are the shorter lines of feathers overlapping these
+long quills.</p>
+
+<p><i>Tail coverts</i> are the lengthened feathers that overlap the root of
+the tail both above and below, called respectively upper and
+under tail coverts.</p>
+
+<p><i>Ear coverts</i> are the feathers that over-lie the ear, often specially
+modified or colored.</p>
+
+<p><i>Rump</i>, the space between the middle of the back and the root of
+the tail.</p>
+
+<p>&#9794; is the sign used to indicate the male sex.</p></div><p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[114]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>&#9792; is the sign used to indicate the female sex.</p>
+
+<p>A <i>subspecies</i> is a geographical race, modified in size, color, or
+proportions chiefly by the influence of climate. These variations
+are especially marked in non-migratory birds of wide distribution,
+subject, therefore, to climatic extremes. The Downy
+and the Hairy Woodpeckers, for example, are split up into
+numerous races. It should be remembered that when a species
+has been separated into races, or subspecies, all the subspecies
+are of equal rank, even though they are differently
+designated. The one originally discovered and first described
+bears the old Latin name which consisted of two words, while
+the new ones are designated by triple Latin names&mdash;the old
+binomial and a new name in addition. The binomial indicates
+the form first described. The forms designated by trinomials
+may be equally well known, abundant, and widely distributed.
+For example, among the woodpeckers, the northern form of
+the Hairy Woodpecker was first discovered and bears the
+name <i>Dryobates villosus</i>; but the first Downy Woodpecker described
+was a southern bird, and the northern form was not
+separated until a few years ago, so that the southern bird is
+the type, and the northern one bears the trinomial, <i>Dryobates
+pubescens medianus</i>.</p>
+
+<p><i>North America</i>, by the decision of the American Ornithologists&rsquo;
+Union, is held to include the continent north of the present
+boundary between Mexico and the United States, with
+Greenland, the peninsula of Lower California, and the islands
+adjacent naturally belonging to the same.</p>
+
+<p>The following key and descriptions will enable the student to
+identify any woodpecker known to occur within these limits:</p></div>
+
+<h4>A. <span class="smcap">Key to the Woodpeckers of North America.</span></h4>
+
+<p>Family characteristics: color always striking, usually in spots,
+bars, or patches of contrasting colors, especially black and white.
+Sexes usually unlike; male always with some portion of red or
+yellow about head, throat, or neck. Tails stiff, rounded, composed
+of ten fully developed pointed feathers (and two undeveloped
+feathers). Wings large, rounded, with long, conspicuous
+secondaries, and short coverts. Bill straight, stout, of medium<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[115]</a></span>
+length. Toes four, arranged in pairs, except in the three-toed
+genus. Iris brown, except when noted. Marked by a habit of
+clinging to upright surfaces and digging a deep hole in a tree-trunk
+for nesting. Eggs always pearly white.</p>
+
+<p>I. Very large&mdash;18 inches <i>or more</i>; conspicuously crested. A.<br />
+II. Medium or small&mdash;14 inches <i>or less</i>; never crested. B.</p>
+
+<dl class="key">
+<dd class="t0">A. a<sup>1</sup> Bill gleaming <i>ivory white</i>; fourth toe decidedly longest.</dd>
+<dt>Ivory-billed Woodpecker. <a href="#b1">1.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t1">a<sup>2</sup> Bill <i>blackish</i>; fourth toe not decidedly longest.</dd>
+<dt>Pileated Woodpecker or Logcock. <a href="#b14">14.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t0">B. a<sup>1</sup> Toes three; &#9794; with <i>yellow</i> crown.</dd>
+<dt>Three-toed Woodpeckers. <a href="#b9">9</a> &amp; <a href="#b10">10.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t1">a<sup>2</sup> Toes four; crown never yellow (b).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t3">b<sup>1</sup> <i>Not spotted nor streaked either above or below</i> (c).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t5">c<sup>1</sup> Body clear black; <i>head white</i>.</dd>
+<dt>White-headed Woodpecker. <a href="#b8">8.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t5">c<sup>2</sup> Blue-black above; <i>rump white</i>; <i>head</i> and <i>neck red</i>.</dd>
+<dt>Red-headed Woodpecker. <a href="#b15">15.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t5">c<sup>3</sup> Greenish black above, with <i>pinkish red belly</i>.</dd>
+<dt>Lewis&rsquo;s Woodpecker. <a href="#b17">17.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t5">c<sup>4</sup> Greenish black with <i>sulphur yellow forehead</i> and <i>throat.</i></dd>
+<dt>Californian Woodpecker. <a href="#b16">16.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t5">c<sup>5</sup> Glossy blue-black with <i>scarlet throat</i> and <i>yellow belly</i>.</dd>
+<dt>Male of Williamson&rsquo;s Sapsucker. <a href="#b13">13.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t3">b<sup>2</sup> <i>Spotted with black or brown on breast and sides</i>, but not
+streaked nor barred with white (d).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t5">d<sup>1</sup> <i>Brown</i> spots on breast and sides; upper parts plain brown.</dd>
+<dt>Arizona Woodpecker. <a href="#b7">7.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t5">d<sup>2</sup> <i>Black</i> spots on breast and sides; wings and tail brilliantly colored beneath (e).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t7">e<sup>1</sup> Wings and tail <i>golden</i> beneath; mustaches <i>black</i> in male, wanting in female.</dd>
+<dt>Flicker. <a href="#b21">21.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">e<sup>2</sup> Wings and tail <i>golden</i> beneath; mustaches <i>red</i> in both sexes.</dd>
+<dt>Gilded Flicker. <a href="#b23">23.</a>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[116]</a></span></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">e<sup>3</sup> Wings and tail <i>golden red</i> beneath; mustaches red.</dd>
+<dt>Red-shafted Flicker. <a href="#b22">22.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">e<sup>4</sup> Wings and tail <i>golden red</i> beneath; mustaches red; crown brown.</dd>
+<dt>Guadalupe Flicker. <a href="#b24">24.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t3">b<sup>3</sup> <i>Streaked, spotted, or barred with white on back and wings</i> (f).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t5">f<sup>1</sup> <i>Back streaked</i>, <i>plain</i>, or <i>varied</i>, <i>never</i> barred with white; wings <i>spotted</i> with white (g).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t7">g<sup>1</sup> <i>Clear</i> white and black; <i>white streak down the back</i> (h).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t9">h<sup>1</sup> Medium size, 9-11 inches.</dd>
+<dt>Hairy Woodpecker. <a href="#b2">2.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t9">h<sup>2</sup> Small size, 6-7 inches.</dd>
+<dt>Downy Woodpecker. <a href="#b3">3.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">g<sup>2</sup> <i>Grayish</i> white and black; <i>sides closely barred</i> (i).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t9">i<sup>1</sup> Back plain black, white <i>stripe</i> down side of throat.</dd>
+<dt>Female of Arctic Three-toed Woodpecker. <a href="#b9">9.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t9">i<sup>2</sup> Back with interrupted white stripe, white <i>line</i> down side of throat.</dd>
+<dt>Female of American Three-toed Woodpecker. <a href="#b10">10.</a></dt>
+<dd class="t10">(<span class="smcap">Note.</span>&mdash;The males are similar with the addition
+of the yellow crown. The three toes cannot ordinarily be seen in life.)</dd>
+
+<dd class="t7">g<sup>3</sup> <i>Yellowish</i> (often dingy or smutty), white and black;
+under parts yellowish; back varied with white, no
+line nor streak; <i>rump white</i>; <i>white wing-bars</i> (j).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t9">j<sup>1</sup> Breast with black patch; head of adult with red patches.</dd>
+<dt>Yellow-bellied Sapsucker. <a href="#b11">11.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t9">j<sup>2</sup> Breast and head red.</dd>
+<dt>Red-breasted Sapsucker. <a href="#b12">12.</a></dt>
+
+<dd style="margin-left: 5.5em;">f<sup>2</sup> <i>Back barred with white</i>; wings spotted or barred with white (k).</dd>
+
+<dd class="t7">k<sup>1</sup> Belly <i>white; ear coverts white</i>.</dd>
+<dt>Red-cockaded Woodpecker. <a href="#b4">4.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">k<sup>2</sup> Belly <i>white; forehead black</i>.</dd>
+<dt>Nuttall&rsquo;s Woodpecker. <a href="#b6">6.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">k<sup>3</sup> Belly <i>smoky brown</i>; forehead and breast same.</dd>
+<dt>Texan Woodpecker. <a href="#b5">5.</a>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[117]</a></span></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">k<sup>4</sup> Belly <i>sulphur or lemon yellow</i>.</dd>
+<dt>Female of Williamson&rsquo;s Woodpecker. <a href="#b13">13.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">k<sup>5</sup> Belly <i>pinkish red</i>.</dd>
+<dt>Red-bellied Woodpecker. <a href="#b18">18.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">k<sup>6</sup> Belly <i>yellow</i>, hind neck and forehead orange.</dd>
+<dt>Golden-fronted Woodpecker. <a href="#b19">19.</a></dt>
+
+<dd class="t7">k<sup>7</sup> Belly <i>yellow</i>, hind neck brown.</dd>
+<dt>Gila Woodpecker. <a href="#b20">20.</a></dt>
+</dl>
+
+<h4>B. <span class="smcap">Descriptions of the Woodpeckers of North
+America.</span></h4>
+
+<p>The following are descriptions of all the species of Woodpeckers
+found in North America, arranged in their proper
+genera and in the order given in the check list of the American
+Ornithologists&rsquo; Union, 1895; with the range of species and subspecies
+as defined by the same authority or by Bendire&rsquo;s &ldquo;Life
+Histories of North American Birds.&rdquo;</p>
+
+<dl class="species">
+<dt id="b1">1. <span class="smcap">Campephilus principalis</span>, <i>Ivory-billed Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Glossy black except <i>white secondaries</i> (very conspicuous)
+and white stripe from beneath ear down neck and shoulders;
+white nasal tufts; <i>bill white</i>. Both sexes crested; &#9794;
+with scarlet occipital crest, &#9792; with crest black. Iris yellow.
+20 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Cypress swamps of Gulf States, locally distributed.</dd>
+<dd>The largest, shyest, and rarest of our woodpeckers.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b2">2. <span class="smcap">Dryobates villosus</span>, <i>Hairy Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+
+<dd>Black and white. Upper parts glossy black with a broad
+<i>white stripe</i> down the back; wings thickly spotted with
+white; under parts white; three outer pairs of tail feathers
+white; two white and two black stripes on sides of head;
+nasal tufts brownish white. &#9794; with scarlet occipital patch.
+9-10 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Eastern United States except South Atlantic and Gulf
+States, with the following subspecies, all the races being
+resident the year round, and breeding in most places
+where they are found:&mdash;
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[118]</a></span></dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>D. v. leucomelas</i>, <i>Northern Hairy Woodpecker</i>. 10-11 inches.</dt>
+<dd>Larger, whiter.</dd>
+<dd class="range">British America.</dd>
+
+<dt>b. <i>D. v. audubonii</i>, <i>Southern Hairy Woodpecker</i>. 8-8.5 inches.</dt>
+<dd>Smaller, more dingy white.</dd>
+<dd class="range">South Atlantic and Gulf States.</dd>
+
+<dt>c. <i>D. v. harrisii</i>, <i>Harris&rsquo;s Woodpecker</i>. 9-10 inches.</dt>
+<dd>Upper parts with less white, few wing spots, under parts
+soiled white or smoky brown; larger than next.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Northwest coast, northern California to Alaska.</dd>
+
+<dt>d. <i>D. v. hyloscopus</i>, <i>Cabanis&rsquo;s Woodpecker</i>. 8.5-9.5 inches.</dt>
+<dd>White stripe down back very wide; purer white below than
+<i>harrisii</i>; fewer wing spots than <i>leucomelas</i> and <i>villosus</i>.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Western United States, except northwest coast, east to
+the Rocky Mountains.</dd>
+
+<dt>e. <i>D. v. monticola</i>, <i>Rocky Mountain Woodpecker</i>. 10-11 inches.</dt>
+<dd>Larger; more white spots near bend of wing and secondaries
+than <i>hyloscopus</i>, fewer than <i>villosus</i>; pure white below.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Rocky Mountains west to Uintah Mountains, Utah.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+<dt id="b3">3. <span class="smcap">Dryobates pubescens</span>, <i>Southern Downy Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Black and white; broad <i>white stripe</i> down back; wings
+thickly spotted with white; under parts white. &#9794; with
+scarlet occipital patch. A miniature Hairy Woodpecker,
+differing only in having <i>four</i> outer pairs of tail feathers
+more or less white and the <i>outermost barred</i>. 6.5 inches.
+Like the Hairy Woodpecker, the Downy and its subspecies
+are resident and breed wherever they occur.</dd>
+<dd class="range">South Atlantic and Gulf States.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>D. p. gairdnerii</i>, <i>Gairdner&rsquo;s Woodpecker</i>. 6.75 inches.</dt>
+<dd>Bears same relation to Downy that Harris&rsquo;s does to Hairy
+Woodpecker; under parts smoky white; wings spots few.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Pacific coast north to about lat. 55&deg;.</dd>
+
+<dt>b. <i>D. p. oreoecus</i>, <i>Batchelder&rsquo;s Woodpecker</i>. 7.5 inches.</dt>
+<dd>Under parts pure white; under tail coverts unspotted;
+fewer wing spots than <i>medianus</i> and <i>pubescens</i>.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Rocky Mountain region of United States.</dd>
+
+<dt>c. <i>D. p. medianus</i>, <i>Downy Woodpecker</i>. 7 inches.
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[119]</a></span></dt>
+<dd>The larger, whiter form seen in New England and the
+Northern States.</dd>
+
+<dt>d. <i>D. p. nelsoni</i>, <i>Nelson&rsquo;s Downy Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Whiter, larger, with fewer black bars on outer tail
+feathers.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Alaska and region north of 55&deg;.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+<dt id="b4">4. <span class="smcap">Dryobates borealis</span>, <i>Red-cockaded Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Upper parts black <i>barred</i> with white, under parts dingy white;
+sides streaked and spotted with black; wings spotted with
+white; outer tail feathers barred; nasal tufts and <i>large ear</i>
+<i>patch white</i>; stripe of black down side of neck. &#9794; with
+a tiny tuft of scarlet feathers on each side of head. 7.5-8.5
+inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Pine woods of southeastern United States, from Tennessee
+southwest to eastern Texas and the Indian Territory;
+casual north to Pennsylvania.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b5">5. <span class="smcap">Dryobates scalaris bairdi</span>, <i>Texan Woodpecker</i>, <i>Ladder-backed Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Upper parts barred with black and white on back, wings,
+and outer tail feathers; sides of head striped; forehead,
+nasal feathers, and under parts <i>smoky gray</i>, brownest on
+belly; <i>crown speckled with white or red</i>; &#9794; with nape crimson.
+7-7.5 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Southern border of United States, Texas to California,
+north to southwestern Utah and southern Nevada; generally
+resident.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>D. s. lucasanus</i>, <i>St. Lucas Woodpecker</i>. Larger.</dt>
+<dd class="range">Lower California, north to 34&deg; in Colorado desert.</dd>
+<dd>These are both subspecies of a Mexican species not occurring
+within our limits.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+
+<dt id="b6">6. <span class="smcap">Dryobates nuttallii</span>, <i>Nuttall&rsquo;s Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Upper parts barred with black and white; under parts and
+<i>outer tail feathers white</i> or dingy white; nasal tufts white;
+<i>forehead and crown black sprinkled with white</i>. &#9794; with red
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[120]</a></span>
+on occiput and nape. 7-7.5 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Southern Oregon and California west of Sierra Nevada
+and Cascade Ranges; most common in the oak belt of
+the foothills.</dd>
+<dd>Easily distinguished from Downy Woodpecker by being
+barred on the back, instead of striped.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b7">7. <span class="smcap">Dryobates arizon&aelig;</span>, <i>Arizona Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd><i>Upper parts plain brown, not spotted nor streaked</i>; primaries
+dotted with fine white dots; outer tail feathers barred;
+under parts white, <i>thickly spotted</i> (except throat), <i>with large,</i>
+<i>round, brown spots</i>. &#9794; with red occipital band. 7.5-8.5
+inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico; among
+oaks of the foothills from 4000 to 7000 feet elevation.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b8">8. <span class="smcap">Xenopicus albolarvatus</span>, <i>White-headed Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd><i>Glossy black all over, except showy white patch on primaries,</i>
+and <i>head and throat pure white</i> (forehead and crown
+sometimes grayish). &#9794; with broad occipital band of scarlet.
+9 inches. &ldquo;Iris pinkish red&rdquo; (Bendire).</dd>
+<dd class="range">Mountains of Pacific coast, east to western Nevada and
+western Idaho, usually in the pine and fir forests above
+4000 feet altitude.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b9">9. <span class="smcap">Picoides arcticus</span>, <i>Arctic Three-toed Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd><i>Glossy black above, unmarked</i> except by fine white spots on
+primaries; under parts grayish white, sides thickly barred
+black and white; three outer pairs of tail feathers white,
+sides of throat with broad <i>white stripe</i>. &#9794; with <i>large crown</i>
+<i>patch of deep yellow</i>. 9.5 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">British America, south into the northern tier of States
+and into the Sierra Nevada Mountains to Lake Tahoe.</dd>
+<dd>Most commonly seen in the track of forest fires, where it
+is usually abundant for about two years; rare outside of the
+extensive soft wood tracts, and usually found singly or in
+pairs except when on burnt land. I have found this species
+far more common than the next, and the best mark in life
+to be the white <i>stripe</i> on the neck, in distinction from the
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[121]</a></span>
+white <i>line</i> of <i>P. americanus</i>.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b10">10. <span class="smcap">Picoides americanus</span>, <i>American Three-toed Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Very similar to preceding species, but with narrow bars of
+white forming an <i>interrupted stripe down the back</i>; head
+thickly sprinkled with white in both sexes and a white line
+on nape or just below; a <i>white line</i>, too narrow to be called
+a stripe, down side of throat. &#9794; with <i>crown bright yellow</i>.
+9 inches. Same range in the East as last; replaced in West
+by following subspecies:&mdash;</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>P. a. alascensis</i>, <i>Alaskan Three-toed Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Smaller; more white; nape very white; more white on top
+of head.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Alaska, south to 48&deg;. (Mt. Baker, Washington).</dd>
+
+<dt>b. <i>P. a. dorsalis</i>, <i>Alpine Three-toed Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>More white on back and head than <i>P. americanus</i>, less than
+<i>alascensis</i>; but continuous, not barred. &ldquo;Iris dark cherry-red&rdquo;
+(Mearns).</dd>
+<dd class="range">Rocky Mountain region, south to New Mexico and Arizona.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+<dt id="b11">11. <span class="smcap">Sphyrapicus varius</span>, <i>Yellow-bellied Sapsucker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Under parts whitish or pale sulphur yellow; upper parts
+black, mottled with pure or yellowish white; <i>rump white</i>;
+wings spotted, and with conspicuous white coverts; tail
+black with <i>outer webs of outer feathers</i> and <i>inner webs of middle</i>
+<i>feathers light colored</i>; sides streaked; breast with a <i>broad</i>
+<i>black patch</i> extending in a &ldquo;chin-strap&rdquo; to the corners of
+the mouth; sides of the head striped. Occiput black, nape
+white. &#9794; with forehead, crown, chin, and throat crimson;
+&#9792; usually with crown crimson, forehead black, and throat
+white, back more brownish; &#9792; sometimes, and young always,
+with crown blackish. 7.5-8.5 inches.</dd>
+<dd>Colors vary much with age, sex, and season; the wing bar
+and yellowish tinge are good marks for all plumages; the
+rump and breast patch for adult birds.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Eastern North America, breeding from Massachusetts
+northward, migrating in winter to the Southern States.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>S. v. nuchalis</i>, <i>Red-naped Sapsucker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Similar, but an additional red stripe on nape, and the black
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[122]</a></span>
+chin-strap replaced by crimson. 8-8.5 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Rocky Mountains to Coast Range, replacing the above in
+the mountains; usually breeding at from 5000 to 10,000
+feet elevation.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+<dt id="b12">12. <span class="smcap">Sphyrapicus ruber</span>, <i>Red-breasted Sapsucker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Body and under parts similar to <i>S. varius</i>, but back much
+less variegated with white. No black on breast, no white
+stripe through eyes. Nasal tufts brownish instead of white.
+<i>Head</i>, <i>neck</i>, and <i>breast uniform crimson</i>. <i>Sexes alike.</i> Young
+with crimson replaced by gray or &ldquo;claret brown&rdquo; (Bendire).
+8.5-9 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Pacific coast, Sierra Nevada, and on both sides of Cascade
+Mountains; a summer resident only north of northern
+California.</dd>
+<dd>At first sight the Red-breasted Sapsucker might be mistaken
+for the Red-headed Woodpecker, but the two birds
+do not inhabit the same country.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b13">13. <span class="smcap">Sphyrapicus thyroideus</span>, <i>Williamson&rsquo;s Sapsucker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Sexes totally dissimilar except in having a white rump and
+yellow under parts. <i>Male, glossy black all over except</i> conspicuous
+<i>white rump</i> and <i>white wing coverts</i>, two white stripes
+on sides of head, white nasal tufts, white spots on primaries;
+sides and tail coverts mottled; a stripe of scarlet down middle
+of throat and <i>brilliant yellow under parts</i>. <i>Female, light</i>
+<i>brown</i>; head clear brown; body, wings, and tail closely
+<i>barred</i> with black and white; no white wing coverts; rarely
+a red throat like male; usually but not always a large
+black patch on breast, and always a <i>yellow belly</i> and <i>white</i>
+<i>rump</i>. Young males lack the red on the throat and usually
+the yellow on the belly; the black is dull, and the throat a
+dingy white. Young females lack the yellow on the belly
+and the black on breast, and are dull-colored and indistinctly
+marked. 9-9.5 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Rocky Mountain region, west to Sierra Nevada, Cascades
+and northern Coast Ranges, breeding at from 5000
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[123]</a></span>
+to 9000 feet elevation. The handsomest of our woodpeckers.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b14">14. <span class="smcap">Ceophloeus pileatus</span>, <i>Pileated Woodpecker, Logcock</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Body blackish slate; wings with a large white patch conspicuous
+only when flying; throat white; a white stripe
+across cheek and down neck; jaw-stripe scarlet in male,
+blackish in female; both sexes with scarlet crest, but in the
+male the whole top of head (which is slaty black in female)
+equally brilliant. This red cap gives the bird the name of
+<i>pileated</i>. Iris yellow. 17 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Wooded regions of Southern States, Florida to North
+Carolina, very rarely near settlements, but far more common
+than the following subspecies of the North and
+West.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>C. p. abieticola</i>, <i>Northern Pileated Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Larger; more extensive white markings; the black grayer
+or browner.</dd>
+<dd class="range">From Virginia northward to 63&deg; in the East, and in the
+West among the Rocky Mountains, north of Colorado, to
+the northwest coast; a shy woodland bird to be looked
+for only in the primitive evergreen forests, though sometimes
+occurring in any heavy timber and, in New England,
+upon the higher well-wooded mountains. The
+largest of the northern woodpeckers; resident.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+<dt id="b15">15. <i>Melanerpes erythrocephalus</i>, <i>Red-headed Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Wings, tail, and upper parts glossy blue-black; rump, exposed
+secondaries, and under parts from breast downward
+pure white; <i>head</i>, <i>neck</i>, and <i>breast crimson.</i> <i>Sexes alike.</i>
+Young with red and black wholly or partly replaced by
+grayish brown; can be recognized by white markings. 9.5
+inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">United States, west to Rocky Mountains; rare east of
+Hudson River, but ordinarily breeding wherever found;
+in winter usually migratory from its northern limits, the
+migration depending principally upon the food supply
+and depth of snow.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b16">16. <span class="smcap">Melanerpes formicivorus</span>, <i>Ant-eating Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Upper parts, wings, and tail glossy greenish black; <i>rump</i>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[124]</a></span>
+and lower parts <i>white</i>; white patch on primaries, conspicuous
+in flight; upper throat and line about the bill dull
+black; <i>forehead</i> with <i>wide white band</i>; lower <i>throat sulphur</i>
+<i>yellow</i>; breast and sides thickly streaked with black and
+white. &#9794; with crown and occiput crimson; &#9792; with crown
+black, occiput crimson. Iris white. 7-9 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Mexico; western Texas.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>M. f. angustifrons</i>, <i>Narrow-fronted Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Similar, but with a <i>narrow band of white</i> across the <i>forehead</i>;
+breast and sides not so thickly streaked.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Lower California, never occurring within the borders of
+the United States.</dd>
+
+<dt>b. <i>M. f. bairdi</i>, <i>Californian Woodpecker</i>, <i>El Carpintero</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Similar to <i>M. formicivorus</i>, but the breast black, little
+streaked with white except along the sides; yellow of throat
+paler, or replaced by white. Iris white. Larger, 7.5-9.5
+inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Pacific coast, north into Oregon to 44&deg;, east to southern
+New Mexico and Texas in the south and to the eastern
+slopes of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Mountains in
+the north, but more abundant, on the western than on the
+eastern slopes of these mountains.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+<dt id="b17">17. <span class="smcap">Melanerpes torquatus</span>, <i>Lewis&rsquo;s Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Upper parts, wings, and tail glossy greenish black; under
+parts <i>pinkish red</i>; chest and <i>collar round hind neck hoary</i>
+<i>gray</i>; crown and sides of head black; forehead, cheeks, and
+chin crimson. <i>Sexes alike.</i> Young with pink replaced by
+grayish. 10.5-11.5 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Pacific coast, east to Black Hills and Rocky Mountains
+between Arizona and 49th parallel; casual still farther
+east; migratory in its northern ranges; a silent, heavy
+flying bird, different in habits and appearance from the
+other woodpeckers; often seen flycatching.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b18">18. <span class="smcap">Melanerpes carolinus</span>, <i>Red-bellied Woodpecker</i>, <i>Zebra Bird</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Back and wings black, <i>barred with white</i>; under and upper
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[125]</a></span>
+tail coverts, middle and outer tail feathers, white varied
+with black; head and under parts ashy; <i>belly tinged with reddish</i>.
+&#9794; with whole top of head and nape bright red;&#9792;
+with forehead and nape red, crown gray. 9-10 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Eastern and Southern States between the Hudson River
+and the Rocky Mountains, north to southern New York,
+Ohio, southern Michigan, etc.; migratory in its northern
+ranges.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b19">19. <span class="smcap">Melanerpes aurifrons</span>, <i>Golden-fronted Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Back and wings barred with black and white; rump white;
+entire under parts brownish white, unspotted (except under
+tail coverts); primaries unspotted, except at tip; tail black
+with slightly barred outer feathers; <i>belly yellowish; forehead</i>
+<i>and hind neck orange in both sexes</i>. &#9794; with <i>crown red</i> set in
+a larger patch of clear gray; &#9792; with crown clear gray. 9.5
+inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Central and southern Texas, north to about 33&ordm;; breeds
+wherever found.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b20">20. <span class="smcap">Melanerpes uropygialis</span>, <i>Gila Woodpecker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Back and wings barred with black and white; <i>head and</i>
+<i>lower parts smoky brown</i>; rump black and white; tail barred
+on inner and outer feathers; primaries unspotted; belly yellow
+(not conspicuous). &#9794; with red crown surrounded by
+brownish; &ldquo;iris red&rdquo; (Hayden). 9 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Southwestern New Mexico and Arizona to southeastern
+California, usually above 2000 feet altitude; its distribution
+depending principally upon the giant cactus.</dd>
+
+<dt id="b21">21. <span class="smcap">Colaptes auratus</span>, <i>Flicker</i>, <i>Yellow-hammer</i>, <i>High-hole</i>, <i>Clape</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Back and wings (except primaries) brownish gray, barred
+with black; under parts pale vinaceous spotted with black
+spots from breast downward; rump white; tail and wings
+<i>golden yellow beneath</i>, dark above, showing the yellow shafts;
+<i>tail feathers with black tips below; top of head ashy gray,</i>
+sides of head and throat vinaceous; a broad <i>black crescent</i>
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[126]</a></span>
+across breast, a bright scarlet one on nape. &#9794; <i>with black</i>
+<i>jaw patches</i>; &#9792; without them. 12 inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">South Atlantic and Gulf region, north to North Carolina.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>C. a. luteus</i>, <i>Northern Flicker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Larger; paler; black bars above narrower; less black and
+white below.</dd>
+<dd class="range">North from North Carolina and west to the Rocky Mountains;
+casual farther west; migratory from its northern
+ranges.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+<dt id="b22">22. <span class="smcap">Colaptes cafer</span>, <i>Red-shafted Flicker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Color pattern similar to above with the following differences:
+<i>wings and tail red beneath</i> instead of yellow; throat
+ashy gray; usually no red on occiput (though some specimens
+show a narrow crescent). &#9794; <i>with red jaw patches</i>. 12.5-14
+inches.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Rocky Mountain region west to Pacific coast from
+Mexico to British Columbia, except northwest coast
+region of Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia,
+and occasionally east to Kansas and Nebraska; resident
+except in the more northern portions of its range.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>C. c. saturatior</i>, <i>Northwestern Flicker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Darker; smaller; narrower breast crescent.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Northwest coast, replacing the above, from which it cannot
+be separated in life.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+
+<dt id="b23">23. <span class="smcap">Colaptes chrysoides</span>, <i>Gilded Flicker</i>; <i>Cactus Flicker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Color pattern same as <i>C. auratus</i>, but throat gray; top of
+head brown; <i>occiput without band</i>; tail band broader and
+yellow paler than in <i>C. auratus</i>. &#9794; with <i>jaw patches bright</i>
+<i>red</i>; &ldquo;iris blood red&rdquo; (Hayden).</dd>
+<dd class="range">Central and southern Arizona and Lower California.</dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="subsp">
+<dt>a. <i>C. c. brunescens</i>, <i>Brown Flicker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>A curious subspecies of the last, smaller, with larger,
+more numerous spots and a smoky brown cast of plumage;
+black tail band very wide; jaw patches red; wings and tail
+yellow beneath.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Lower (not southern) California; casual only in southern
+California; in Arizona to 35&deg;.
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[127]</a></span></dd>
+</dl>
+<dl class="species">
+<dt id="b24">24. <span class="smcap">Colaptes rufipileus</span>, <i>Guadalupe Island Flicker</i>.</dt>
+<dd>Coloration like <i>C. cafer</i>, crown decidedly brown; crescent
+on nape wanting; jaw patches red; wings and tail <i>red</i> beneath.</dd>
+<dd class="range">Guadalupe Island off the coast of Lower California.</dd>
+</dl>
+<hr />
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[129]</a></span></p>
+<h2><a name="INDEX" id="INDEX"></a>INDEX</h2>
+<p>
+Aard-vark, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Acorns, eaten by woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Acquired habits, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>-<a href="#Page_66">66</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Adaptations of woodpeckers to environment,<a href="#Page_104">104</a>-<a href="#Page_109">109</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Ant-bear, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Ants, as food for woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Argument from design, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Bear, black, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Beechnuts, as food for woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Beetles, as food for woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Bill of woodpeckers as a tool, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>-<a href="#Page_76">76</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Borers, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Burroughs, John, quoted, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Cacti, woodpeckers nesting in, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Cannibalism among woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Carpenter, the. <i>See</i> California woodpecker.<br />
+<br />
+Carpintero, El. <i>See</i> California woodpecker.<br />
+<br />
+Caterpillars, as food for woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Cecropia chrysalids, eaten by woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Chestnuts, eaten by woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Chickadee, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Chipmunks, hoarding food, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Clape. <i>See</i> Flicker.<br />
+<br />
+Creeper, brown, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Crossbills, eating salted food, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Crow, hoarding habit, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>; <a href="#Page_74">74</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Cuckoo, ground, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Cuckoos, yoke-toed, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Drumming of yellow-bellied sapsucker, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Evolution, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Feeding young, how the flicker does it, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Fence-posts used by woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Finch, purple, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Finches, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Fish-spears, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Flicker, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>-<a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>-<a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>.<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">brown, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">cactus, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">gilded, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Guadalupe Island, <a href="#Page_127">127</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">northern, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">northwestern, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">red-shafted, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>.</span><br />
+<br />
+Flycatching habits of woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Foot, of a four-toed woodpecker figured, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>.<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">of a three-toed woodpecker figured, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">discussed as a tool, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>-<a href="#Page_85">85</a>.</span><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Grasshoppers, as food for woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Grosbeaks, pine, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Grouse, ruffed, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Grouse, sharp-tailed, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Hawk, sparrow, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>.<br />
+<br />
+High-hole. <i>See</i> Flicker.<br />
+<br />
+Hoarding habits, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Hummingbird, Anna&rsquo;s, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[130]</a></span>
+Hummingbirds, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Hyoid bones, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>-<a href="#Page_103">103</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Jay, blue, hoarding habit, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Kinglets, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Lightning rods attracting woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Logcock. <i>See</i> Woodpecker, pileated.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Maple, rock and red, sugar made from, <a href="#Page_36">36</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Maize, eaten by English sparrows, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Mandibles of woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Martin, sand, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Mice, hoarding habit, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Migration, dependent upon food supply, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Mountain-ash trees, sought by woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Nesting of woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>-<a href="#Page_23">23</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Nests, in unusual places, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>.<br />
+<br />
+North America, ornithologically defined, <a href="#Page_114">114</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Nuthatches, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Oaks, used by Californian woodpecker for storing nuts, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Oranges, eaten by woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Owls, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Pangolin, as an ant-eater, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Parrot, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Parroquet, Carolina, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Pigeon, domestic, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Pines, acorns stored in, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>.<br />
+<br />
+&ldquo;Ploughshare,&rdquo; anchylosed vertebr&aelig; of tail, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Ravens, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Reason in woodpeckers&rsquo; hoarding, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Red-head. <i>See</i> Woodpecker, red-headed.<br />
+<br />
+Robins, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Sap, not used as an insect-lure, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>.<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">how its loss harms the tree, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>.</span><br />
+<br />
+Sapsucker, orange, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>. <i>See, also</i>, Woodpecker, red-bellied.<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">red-breasted, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">red-naped, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Williamson&rsquo;s, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">yellow-bellied, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>-<a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>-<a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_106">106</a>.</span><br />
+<br />
+Skull of woodpecker figured, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Sparrow, English <i>or</i> house, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Spears, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Spruce, acorns stored in, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Squirrels, thievishness of, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Subspecies defined, <a href="#Page_114">114</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Swallow, eaves <i>or</i> cliff, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Swallow, tree, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Swift, chimney, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Tail, shape, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>.<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">number of rectrices, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">experimental demonstration of shape <i>a priori</i>, <a href="#Page_91">91</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">reason for shape, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>.</span><br />
+<br />
+Tail-feathers studied, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>-<a href="#Page_97">97</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Taste in the woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Telegraph poles resorted to by woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Thumb, of birds, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Tin roofs resorted to by woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Titmouse, crested, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Toes, numbering of, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Tongue, appearance of, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>.<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">figured, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">bones of, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a>-<a href="#Page_103">103</a>.</span><br />
+<br />
+Trogons, yoke-toed, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Vanessa butterfly, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Vegetable food of woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Vireos, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Warblers, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Weevils, not the object in storing nuts, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>.<br />
+<br />
+Woodpecker, Alaskan three-toed, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>.<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">alpine three-toed, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">American three-toed, <a href="#Page_121">121</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">ant-eating, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">arctic three-toed, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Arizona, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Batchelder&rsquo;s, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[131]</a></span>
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Batchelder&rsquo;s, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">black-breasted, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>. <i>See, also</i>, Williamson&rsquo;s sapsucker.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Cabanis&rsquo;s, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Californian, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>-<a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">downy, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>-<a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Gairdner&rsquo;s, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Gila, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">golden-fronted, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">hairy, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>-<a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Harris&rsquo;s, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">ivory-billed, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">ladder-backed, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Lewis&rsquo;s, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">narrow-fronted, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Nelson&rsquo;s downy, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">northern hairy, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">northern pileated, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Nuttall&rsquo;s, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">pileated, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">red-bellied, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">red-cockaded, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">red-headed, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>-<a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>-<a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Rocky Mountain, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">St. Lucas, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">southern downy, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">southern hairy, <a href="#Page_118">118</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Texan, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">three-toed, foot figured, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">white-headed, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>.</span><br />
+<br />
+Woodpeckers, advantages of, as subject for study, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>.<br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">bill as a tool, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>-<a href="#Page_73">73</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">carpenters or miners, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">character of, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">coloration of, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">coloration of sexes, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">covered nostrils, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">favorite haunts, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">foot, structure and uses, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">habit of drumming, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">how to recognize the woodpeckers, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">inferences from study of bills, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">hunting borers, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">nesting, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">preferred foods, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">tail, study of, <a href="#Page_86">86</a>-<a href="#Page_99">99</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">winter quarters, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>.</span><br />
+<span style="margin-left: 1em;">wooing, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>.</span><br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Yoke-toed feet, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>.<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+Zebra bird. <i>See</i> Woodpecker, red-bellied.<br />
+</p>
+<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[132]</a></span></p>
+
+<div class="center">
+The Riverside Press<br />
+<br />
+<i>Electrotyped and printed by H. O. Houghton &amp; Co.<br />
+Cambridge, Mass, U. S. A.</i><br />
+</div>
+
+<hr />
+<h4>
+Transcribers Notes</h4>
+
+<ul>
+<li>Various punctuation and other printing errors corrected</li>
+<li>Inconsistent hyphenation of words regularised</li>
+<li>Spelling of re&euml;cho (page 16) left intact</li>
+<li>Male symbol shown as &#9794; Female symbol shown as &#9792;</li>
+<li>Illustrations have been moved to not break paragraphs, this means
+that the Illustration Index will not always give the exact location of pictures</li>
+</ul>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's The Woodpeckers, by Fannie Hardy Eckstorm
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WOODPECKERS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 35062-h.htm or 35062-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/5/0/6/35062/
+
+Produced by Bryan Ness, Steve Read and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/35062-h/images/cover.jpg b/35062-h/images/cover.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..faaeba9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/cover.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_001.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_001.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..82a4e74
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_001.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_002.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_002.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..89883ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_002.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_003.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_003.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e3a1ebc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_003.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_004.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_004.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d8426b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_004.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_005.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_005.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..81f5d06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_005.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_006.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_006.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..634963e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_006.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_007.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_007.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3dd800b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_007.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_008.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_008.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f1e0219
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_008.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_009.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_009.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6ebd385
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_009.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_010.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_010.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ad3e452
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_010.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_011.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_011.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c006150
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_011.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_012.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_012.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0d40c19
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_012.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_013.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_013.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4ba7ad9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_013.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_014.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_014.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..251b17c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_014.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_015.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_015.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b17a940
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_015.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_016.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_016.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a94203e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_016.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_017.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_017.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..214f909
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_017.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_018.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_018.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6c7fccd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_018.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_019.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_019.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d0e3243
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_019.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_020.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_020.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4925a39
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_020.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_021.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_021.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2b150e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_021.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_022.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_022.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..799beb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_022.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_023.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_023.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4071d8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_023.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_024.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_024.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ec7ee24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_024.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/fig_025.jpg b/35062-h/images/fig_025.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1f0d3a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/fig_025.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/frontispiece.jpg b/35062-h/images/frontispiece.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..17f7714
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/frontispiece.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062-h/images/t_page.jpg b/35062-h/images/t_page.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..53fa36e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062-h/images/t_page.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/35062.txt b/35062.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..02e05ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3715 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Woodpeckers, by Fannie Hardy Eckstorm
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Woodpeckers
+
+Author: Fannie Hardy Eckstorm
+
+Release Date: January 25, 2011 [EBook #35062]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WOODPECKERS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Bryan Ness, Steve Read and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+[Illustration]
+
+
+
+
+ THE WOODPECKERS
+
+ BY
+
+ FANNIE HARDY ECKSTORM
+
+ WITH ILLUSTRATIONS
+
+[Illustration]
+
+ BOSTON AND NEW YORK
+ HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY
+ The Riverside Press, Cambridge
+ 1901
+
+
+
+
+COPYRIGHT, 1900, BY FANNIE HARDY ECKSTORM
+
+ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
+
+_To_ MY FATHER MR. MANLY HARDY _A Lifelong Naturalist_
+
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+
+ CHAP. PAGE
+
+ FOREWORD: THE RIDDLERS 1
+
+ I. HOW TO KNOW A WOODPECKER 4
+
+ II. HOW THE WOODPECKER CATCHES A GRUB 9
+
+ III. HOW THE WOODPECKER COURTS HIS MATE 15
+
+ IV. HOW THE WOODPECKER MAKES A HOUSE 20
+
+ V. HOW A FLICKER FEEDS HER YOUNG 24
+
+ VI. FRIEND DOWNY 28
+
+ VII. PERSONA NON GRATA. (YELLOW-BELLIED SAPSUCKER) 33
+
+ VIII. EL CARPINTERO. (CALIFORNIAN WOODPECKER) 46
+
+ IX. A RED-HEADED COUSIN. (RED-HEADED WOODPECKER) 55
+
+ X. A STUDY OF ACQUIRED HABITS 60
+
+ XI. THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS BILL 68
+
+ XII. THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS FOOT 77
+
+ XIII. THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS TAIL 86
+
+ XIV. THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS TONGUE 99
+
+ XV. HOW EACH WOODPECKER IS FITTED FOR HIS OWN
+ KIND OF LIFE 104
+
+ XVI. THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN 110
+
+ APPENDIX 113
+
+ A. KEY TO THE WOODPECKERS OF NORTH AMERICA 114
+
+ B. DESCRIPTIONS OF THE WOODPECKERS OF
+ NORTH AMERICA 117
+
+
+
+
+LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
+
+
+ PAGE
+
+ Flicker (colored) _Frontispiece_
+
+ Boring Larva 10
+
+ Indian Spear 12
+
+ Solomon Islander's Spear 13
+
+ Downy Woodpecker (colored) _facing_ 28
+
+ Bark showing Work of Sapsucker 34
+
+ Yellow-bellied Sapsucker (colored) _facing_ 34
+
+ Trunk of Tree showing Work of Californian Woodpecker 47
+
+ Californian Woodpecker (colored) _facing_ 48
+
+ Red-headed Woodpecker (colored) _facing_ 56
+
+ Head of the Lewis's Woodpecker 59
+
+ Head of Ivory-billed Woodpecker 70
+
+ Foot of Woodpecker 77
+
+ Diagram of Right Foot 79
+
+ Foot of Three-toed Woodpecker 80
+
+ Tail of Hairy Woodpecker 86
+
+ Tails of Brown Creeper and Chimney Swift 87
+
+ Middle Tail Feathers of Flicker, Ivory-billed
+ Woodpecker, and Hairy Woodpecker 89
+
+ Diagram of Curvature of Tails of Woodpeckers 90
+
+ Patterns of Tails 91
+
+ Under Side of Middle Tail Feather of
+ Ivory-billed Woodpecker 97
+
+ Tongue of Hairy Woodpecker 99
+
+ Tongue-bones of Flicker 100
+
+ Skull of Woodpecker, showing Bones of Tongue 101
+
+ Hyoids of Sapsucker and Golden-fronted Woodpecker 102
+
+ Diagram of Head of a Flicker 113
+
+_The colored illustrations are by Louis Agassiz Fuertes.
+ The text cuts are from drawings by John L. Ridgway._
+
+
+
+
+THE WOODPECKERS
+
+
+
+
+FOREWORD: THE RIDDLERS
+
+
+Long ago in Greece, the legend runs, a terrible monster called the
+Sphinx used to waylay travelers to ask them riddles: whoever could not
+answer these she killed, but the man who did answer them killed her and
+made an end of her riddling.
+
+To-day there is no Sphinx to fear, yet the world is full of unguessed
+riddles. No thoughtful man can go far afield but some bird or flower or
+stone bars his way with a question demanding an answer; and though many
+men have been diligently spelling out the answers for many years, and we
+for the most part must study the answers they have proved, and must
+reply in their words, yet those shrewd old riddlers, the birds and
+flowers and bees, are always ready for a new victim, putting their heads
+together over some new enigma to bar the road to knowledge till that,
+too, shall be answered; so that other men's learning does not always
+suffice. So much of a man's pleasure in life, so much of his power,
+depends on his ability to silence these persistent questioners, that
+this little book was written with the hope of making clearer the kind of
+questions Dame Nature asks, and the way to get correct answers.
+
+This is purposely a _little_ book, dealing only with a single group of
+birds, treating particularly only some of the commoner species of that
+group, taking up only a few of the problems that present themselves to
+the naturalist for solution, and aiming rather to make the reader
+_acquainted with_ the birds than _learned about_ them.
+
+The woodpeckers were selected in preference to any other family because
+they are patient under observation, easily identified, resident in all
+parts of the country both in summer and in winter, and because more than
+any other birds they leave behind them records of their work which may
+be studied after the birds have flown. The book provides ample means for
+identifying every species and subspecies of woodpecker known in North
+America, though only five of the commonest and most interesting species
+have been selected for special study. At least three of these five
+should be found in almost every part of the country. The Californian
+woodpecker is never seen in the East, nor the red-headed in the far
+West, but the downy and the hairy are resident nearly everywhere, and
+some species of the flickers and sapsuckers, if not always the ones
+chosen for special notice, are visitors in most localities.
+
+Look for the woodpeckers in orchards and along the edges of thickets,
+among tangles of wild grapes and in patches of low, wild berries, upon
+which they often feed, among dead trees and in the track of forest
+fires. Wherever there are boring larvae, beetles, ants, grasshoppers, the
+fruit of poison-ivy, dogwood, june-berry, wild cherry or wild grapes,
+woodpeckers may be confidently looked for if there are any in the
+neighborhood. Be patient, persistent, wide-awake, sure that you see what
+you think you see, careful to remember what you have seen, studious to
+compare your observations, and keen to hear the questions propounded
+you. If you do this seven years and a day, you will earn the name of
+Naturalist; and if you travel the road of the naturalist with curious
+patience, you may some day become as famous a riddle-reader as was that
+Oedipus, the king of Thebes, who slew the Sphinx.
+
+
+
+
+I
+
+HOW TO KNOW A WOODPECKER
+
+
+The woodpecker is the easiest of all birds to recognize. Even if
+entirely new to you, you may readily decide whether a bird is a
+woodpecker or not.
+
+The woodpecker is always striking and is often gay in color. He is
+usually noisy, and his note is clear and characteristic. His shape and
+habits are peculiar, so that whenever you see a bird clinging to the
+side of a tree "as if he had been thrown at it and stuck," you may
+safely call him a woodpecker. Not that all birds which cling to the bark
+of trees are woodpeckers,--for the chickadees, the crested titmice, the
+nuthatches, the brown creepers, and a few others like the kinglets and
+some wrens and wood-warblers more or less habitually climb up and down
+the tree-trunks; but these do it with a pretty grace wholly unlike the
+woodpecker's awkward, cling-fast way of holding on. As the largest of
+these is smaller than the smallest woodpecker, and as none of them
+(excepting only the tiny kinglets) ever shows the patch of yellow or
+scarlet which always marks the head of the male woodpecker, and which
+sometimes adorns his mate, there is no danger of making mistakes.
+
+The nuthatches are the only birds likely to be confused with
+woodpeckers, and these have the peculiar habit of traveling down a
+tree-trunk with their heads pointing to the ground. A woodpecker never
+does this; he may move down the trunk of the tree he is working on, but
+he will do it by hopping backward. A still surer sign of the woodpecker
+is the way he sits upon his tail, using it to brace him. No other birds
+except the chimney swift and the little brown creeper ever do this. A
+sure mark, also, is his feet, which have two toes turned forward and two
+turned backward. We find this arrangement in no other North American
+birds except the cuckoos and our one native parroquet. However, there is
+one small group of woodpeckers which have but three toes, and these are
+the only North American land-birds that do not have four well-developed
+toes.
+
+In coloration the woodpeckers show a strong family likeness. Except in
+some young birds, the color is always brilliant and often is gaudy.
+Usually it shows much clear black and white, with dashes of scarlet or
+yellow about the head. Sometimes the colors are "solid," as in the
+red-headed woodpecker; sometimes they lie in close bars, as in the
+red-bellied species; sometimes in spots and stripes, as in the downy and
+hairy; but there is always a _contrast_, never any blending of hues. The
+red or yellow is laid on in well-defined patches--square, oblong, or
+crescentic--upon the crown, the nape, the jaws, or the throat; or else
+in stripes or streaks down the sides of the head and neck, as in the
+logcock, or pileated woodpecker.
+
+There is no rule about the color markings of the sexes, as in some
+families of birds. Usually the female lacks all the bright markings of
+the male; sometimes, as in the logcock, she has them but in more
+restricted areas; sometimes, as in the flickers, she has all but one of
+the male's color patches; and in a few species, as the red-headed and
+Lewis's woodpeckers, the two sexes are precisely alike in color. In the
+black-breasted woodpecker, sometimes called Williamson's sapsucker, the
+male and female are so totally different that they were long described
+and named as different birds. It sometimes happens that a young female
+will show the color marks of the male, but will retain them only the
+first year.
+
+Though the woodpeckers cling to the trunks of trees, they are not
+exclusively climbing birds. Some kinds, like the flickers, are quite as
+frequently found on the ground, wading in the grass like meadowlarks.
+Often we may frighten them from the tangled vines of the frost grape and
+the branches of wild cherry trees, or from clumps of poison-ivy, whither
+they come to eat the fruit. The red-headed woodpecker is fond of sitting
+on fence posts and telegraph poles; and both he and the flicker
+frequently alight on the roofs of barns and houses and go pecking and
+pattering over the shingles. The sapsuckers and several other kinds will
+perch on dead limbs, like a flycatcher, on the watch for insects; the
+flickers, and more rarely other kinds, will sit crosswise of a limb
+instead of crouching lengthwise of it, as is the custom with
+woodpeckers.
+
+All these points you will soon learn. You will become familiar with the
+form, the flight, and the calls of the different woodpeckers; you will
+learn not only to know them by name, but to understand their characters;
+they will become your acquaintances, and later on your friends.
+
+This heavy bird, with straight, chisel bill and sharp-pointed
+tail-feathers; with his short legs and wide, flapping wings, his
+unmusical but not disagreeable voice, and his heavy, undulating,
+business-like flight, is distinctly bourgeois, the type of a bird
+devoted to business and enjoying it. No other bird has so much work to
+do all the year round, and none performs his task with more energy and
+sense. The woodpecker makes no aristocratic pretensions, puts on none of
+the coy graces and affectations of the professional singer; even his gay
+clothes fit him less jauntily than they would another bird. He is
+artisan to the backbone,--a plain, hard-working, useful citizen,
+spending his life in hammering holes in anything that appears to need a
+hole in it. Yet he is neither morose nor unsocial. There is a vein of
+humor in him, a large reserve of mirth and jollity. We see little of it
+except in the spring, and then for a time all the laughter in him
+bubbles up; he becomes uproarious in his glee, and the melody which he
+cannot vent in song he works out in the channels of his trade, filling
+the woodland with loud and harmonious rappings. Above all other birds he
+is the friend of man, and deserves to have the freedom of the fields.
+
+
+
+
+II
+
+HOW THE WOODPECKER CATCHES A GRUB
+
+
+Did you ever see a hairy woodpecker strolling about a tree for what he
+could pick up?
+
+There is a _whur-r-rp_ of gay black and white wings and the flash of a
+scarlet topknot as, with a sharp cry, he dashes past you, strikes the
+limb solidly with both feet, and instantly sidles behind it, from which
+safe retreat he keeps a sharp black eye fixed upon your motions. If you
+make friends with him by keeping quiet, he will presently forgive you
+for being there and hop to your side of the limb, pursuing his ordinary
+work in the usual way, turning his head from side to side, inspecting
+every crevice, and picking up whatever looks appetizing. Any knot or
+little seam in the bark is twice scanned; in such places moths and
+beetles lay their eggs. Little cocoons are always dainty morsels, and
+large cocoons contain a feast. The butterfly-hunter who is hoping to
+hatch out some fine cecropia moths knows well that a large proportion of
+all the cocoons he discovers will be empty. The hairy woodpecker has
+been there before him, and has torn the chrysalis out of its silken
+cradle. For this the farmer should thank him heartily, even if the
+butterfly-hunter does not, for the cecropia caterpillar is destructive.
+
+But sometimes, on the fair bark of a smooth limb, the woodpecker stops,
+listens, taps, and begins to drill. He works with haste and energy,
+laying open a deep hole. For what? An apple-tree borer was there cutting
+out the life of the tree. The farmer could see no sign of him; neither
+could the woodpecker, but he could hear the strong grub down in his
+little chamber gnawing to make it longer, or, frightened by the heavy
+footsteps on his roof, scrambling out of the way.
+
+[Illustration: Boring larva.]
+
+It is easy to hear the borer at work in the tree. When a pine forest has
+been burned and the trees are dead but still standing, there will be
+such a crunching and grinding of borers eating the dead wood that it can
+be heard on all sides many yards away. Even a single borer can sometimes
+be heard distinctly by putting the ear to the tree. Sound travels much
+farther through solids than it does through air; notice how much farther
+you can hear a railroad train by the click of the rails than by the
+noise that comes on the air. Even our dull ears can detect the woodworm,
+but we cannot locate him. How, then, is the woodpecker to do what we
+cannot do?
+
+Doubtless experience teaches him much, but one observer suggests that
+the woodpecker places the grub by the sense of touch. He says he has
+seen the red-headed woodpecker drop his wings till they trailed along
+the branch, as if to determine where the vibrations in the wood were
+strongest, and thus to decide where the grub was boring. But no one else
+appears to have noticed that woodpeckers are in the habit of trailing
+their wings as they drill for grubs. It would be a capital study for one
+to attempt to discover whether the woodpecker locates his grub by
+feeling, or whether he does it by hearing alone. Only one should be sure
+he is looking for grubs and not for beetles' eggs, nor for ants, nor for
+caterpillars. By the energy with which he drills, and the size of the
+hole left after he has found his tidbit, one can decide whether he was
+working for a borer.
+
+But when the borer has been located, he has yet to be captured. There
+are many kinds of borers. Some channel a groove just beneath the bark
+and are easily taken; but others tunnel deep into the wood. I measured
+such a hole the other day, and found it was more than eight inches long
+and larger than a lead-pencil, bored through solid rock-maple wood. The
+woodpecker must sink a hole at right angles to this channel and draw the
+big grub out through his small, rough-sided hole. You would be
+surprised, if you tried to do the same with a pair of nippers the size
+of the woodpecker's bill, to find how strong the borer is, how he can
+buckle and twist, how he braces himself against the walls of his house.
+Were your strength no greater than the woodpecker's, the task would be
+much harder. Indeed, a large grub would stand a good chance of getting
+away but for one thing, the woodpecker _spears_ him, and thereby saves
+many a dinner for himself.
+
+[Illustration: Indian spear.]
+
+Here is a primitive Indian fish-spear, such as the Penobscots used. To
+the end of a long pole two wooden jaws are tied loosely enough to spring
+apart a little under pressure, and midway between them, firmly driven
+into the end of the pole, is a point of iron. When a fish was struck,
+the jaws sprung apart under the force of the blow, guiding the iron
+through the body of the fish, which was held securely in the hollow
+above, that just fitted around his sides, and by the point itself.
+
+[Illustration: Solomon Islander's spear.]
+
+The tool with which the woodpecker fishes for a grub is very much the
+same. His mandibles correspond to the two movable jaws. They are
+knife-edged, and the lower fits exactly inside the upper, so that they
+give a very firm grip. In addition, the upper one is movable. All birds
+can move the upper mandible, because it is hinged to the skull. (Watch a
+parrot some day, if you do not believe it.) A medium-sized woodpecker,
+like the Lewis's, can elevate his upper mandible at least a quarter of
+an inch without opening his mouth at all. This enables him to draw his
+prey through a smaller hole than would be needed if he must open his
+jaws along their whole length. Between the mandibles is the
+sharp-pointed tongue, which can be thrust entirely through a grub,
+holding him impaled. Unlike the Indian's spear-point, the woodpecker's
+tongue is barbed heavily on both sides, and it is extensile. As a tool
+it resembles the Solomon Islander's spear. A medium-sized woodpecker can
+dart his tongue out two inches or more beyond the tip of his bill. A New
+Bedford boy might tell us, and very correctly, that the woodpecker
+_harpoons_ his grub, just as a whaleman harpoons a whale. If the grub
+tries to back off into his burrow, out darts the long, barbed tongue and
+spears him. Then it drags him along the crooked tunnel and into the
+narrow shaft picked by the woodpecker, where the strong jaws seize and
+hold him firmly.
+
+
+
+
+III
+
+HOW THE WOODPECKER COURTS HIS MATE
+
+
+Other birds woo their mates with songs, but the woodpecker has no voice
+for singing. He cannot pour out his soul in melody and tell his love his
+devotion in music. How do songless birds express their emotions? Some by
+grotesque actions and oglings, as the horned owl, and some by frantic
+dances, as the sharp-tailed grouse, woo and win their mates; but the
+amorous woodpecker, not excepting the flickers, which also woo by
+gestures, whacks a piece of seasoned timber, and rattles off
+interminable messages according to the signal code set down for
+woodpeckers' love affairs. He is the only instrumental performer among
+the birds; for the ruffed grouse, though he drums, has no drum.
+
+There is no cheerier spring sound, in our belated Northern season, than
+the quick, melodious rappings of the sapsucker from some dead ash limb
+high above the meadow. It is the best performance of its kind: he knows
+the capabilities of his instrument, and gets out of it all the music
+there is in it. Most if not all woodpeckers drum occasionally, but
+drumming is the special accomplishment of the sapsucker. He is easily
+first. In Maine, where they are abundant, they make the woods in
+springtime resound with their continual rapping. Early in April, before
+the trees are green with leaf, or the pussy-willows have lost their
+silky plumpness, when the early round-leafed yellow violet is cuddling
+among the brown, dead leaves, I hear the yellow-bellied sapsucker along
+the borders of the trout stream that winds down between the mountains.
+The dead branch of an elm-tree is his favorite perch, and there,
+elevated high above all the lower growth, he sits rolling forth a flood
+of sound like the tremolo of a great organ. Now he plays
+staccato,--detached, clear notes; and now, accelerating his time, he
+dashes through a few bars of impetuous hammerings. The woods reecho with
+it; the mountains give it faintly back. Beneath him the ruffed grouse
+paces back and forth on his favorite mossy log before he raises the
+palpitating whirr of his drumming. A chickadee digging in a rotten limb
+pauses to spit out a mouthful of punky wood and the brown _Vanessa_,
+edged with yellow, first butterfly of the season, flutters by on
+rustling wings. So spring arrives in Maine, ushered in by the reveille
+of the sapsucker.
+
+So ambitious is the sapsucker of the excellence of his performance that
+no instrument but the best will satisfy him. He is always experimenting,
+and will change his anvil for another as soon as he discovers one of
+superior resonance. They say he tries the tin pails of the maple-sugar
+makers to see if these will not give him a clearer note; that he drums
+on tin roofs and waterspouts till he loosens the solder and they come
+tumbling down. But usually he finds nothing so near his liking as a
+hard-wood branch, dead and barkless, the drier, the harder, the thinner,
+the finer grained, so much the better for his uses.
+
+Deficient as they are in voice, the woodpeckers do not lack a musical
+ear. Mr. Burroughs tells us that a downy woodpecker of his acquaintance
+used to change his key by tapping on a knot an inch or two from his
+usual drumming place, thereby obtaining a higher note. Alternating
+between the two places, he gave to his music the charm of greater
+variety. The woodpeckers very quickly discover the superior conductivity
+of metals. In parts of the country where woodpeckers are more abundant
+than good drumming trees, a tin roof proves an almost irresistible
+attraction. A lightning-rod will sometimes draw them farther than it
+would an electric bolt; and a telegraph pole, with its tinkling glasses
+and ringing wires, gives them great satisfaction. If men did not put
+their singing poles in such public places, their music would be much
+more popular with the woodpeckers; but even now the birds often venture
+on the dangerous pastime and hammer you out a concord of sweet sounds
+from the mellow wood-notes, the clear peal of the glass, and the ringing
+overtones of the wires.
+
+The flicker often telegraphs his love by tapping either on a forest tree
+or on some loose board of a barn or outhouse; but he has other ways of
+courting his lady. On fine spring mornings, late in April, I have seen
+them on a horizontal bough, the lady sitting quietly while her lover
+tried to win her approval by strange antics. Quite often there are two
+males displaying their charms in open rivalry, but once I saw them when
+the field was clear. If fine clothes made a gentleman, this brave wooer
+would have been first in all the land: for his golden wings and tail
+showed their glittering under side as he spread them; his scarlet
+headdress glowed like fire; his rump was radiantly white, not to speak
+of the jetty black of his other ornaments and the beautiful
+ground-colors of his body. He danced before his lady, showing her all
+these beauties, and perhaps boasting a little of his own good looks,
+though she was no less beautiful. He spread his wings and tail for her
+inspection; he bowed, to show his red crescent; he bridled, he stepped
+forward and back and sidewise with deep bows to his mistress, coaxing
+her with the mellowest and most enticing _co-wee-tucks_, which no doubt
+in his language meant "Oh, promise me," laughing now and then his jovial
+_wick-a-wick-a-wick-a-wick-a_, either in glee or nervousness. It was all
+so very silly--and so very nice! I wonder how it all came out. Did she
+promise him? Or did she find a gayer suitor?
+
+
+
+
+IV
+
+HOW THE WOODPECKER MAKES A HOUSE
+
+
+All woodpeckers make their houses in the wood of trees, either the trunk
+or one of the branches. Almost the only exceptions to this rule are
+those that live in the treeless countries of the West. In the torrid
+deserts of Arizona and the Southwest, some species are obliged to build
+in the thorny branches of giant cacti, which there grow to an enormous
+size. In the treeless plains to the northward, a few individuals, for
+lack of anything so suitable as the cactus, dig holes in clay banks, or
+even lay their eggs upon the surface of the prairie. In a country where
+chimney swallows nest in deserted houses, and sand martins burrow in the
+sides of wells, who wonders at the flicker's thinking that the side of a
+haystack, the hollow of a wheel-hub, or the cavity under an old
+ploughshare, is an ideal home? But in wooded countries the woodpeckers
+habitually nest in trees. The only exceptions I know are a few flickers'
+holes in old posts, and a few instances where flickers have pecked
+through the weatherboarding of a house to nest in the space between the
+walls.
+
+But because a bird nests in a hole in a tree, it is not necessarily a
+woodpecker. The sparrow-hawk, the house sparrow, the tree swallow, the
+bluebird, most species of wrens, and several of the smaller species of
+owls nest either in natural cavities in trees or in deserted
+woodpeckers' holes. The chickadees, the crested titmice, and the
+nuthatches dig their own holes after the same pattern as the
+woodpecker's. However, the large, round holes were all made by
+woodpeckers, and of those under two inches in diameter, our friend Downy
+made his full share. It is easy to tell who made the hole, for the
+different birds have different styles of housekeeping. The chickadees
+and nuthatches always build a soft little nest of grass, leaves, and
+feathers, while the woodpeckers lay their eggs on a bed of chips, and
+carry nothing in from outside.
+
+Soon after they have mated in the spring, the woodpeckers begin to talk
+of housekeeping. First, a tree must be chosen. It may be sound or partly
+decayed, one of a clump or solitary; but it is usually dead or
+hollow-hearted, and at least partly surrounded by other trees. Sometimes
+a limb is chosen, sometimes an upright trunk, and the nest may be from
+two feet to one hundred feet from the ground, though most frequently it
+will be found not less than ten nor more than thirty feet up. However
+odd the location finally occupied, it is likely that it was not the
+first one selected. A woodpecker will dig half a dozen houses rather
+than occupy an undesirable tenement. It is very common to find their
+unfinished holes and the wider-mouthed, shallower pockets which they dig
+for winter quarters; for those that spend their winters in the cold
+North make a hole to live in nights and cold and stormy days.
+
+The first step in building is to strike out a circle in the bark as
+large as the doorway is to be; that is, from an inch and a half to three
+or four inches in diameter according to the size of the woodpecker. It
+is nearly always a perfect circle. Try, if you please, to draw freehand
+a circle of dots as accurate as that which the woodpecker strikes out
+hurriedly with his bill, and see whether it is easy to do as well as he
+does.
+
+If the size and shape of the doorway suit him, the woodpecker scales off
+the bark inside his circle of holes and begins his hard work. He seems
+to take off his coat and work in his shirtsleeves, so vigorously does he
+labor as he clings with his stout toes, braced in position by his
+pointed tail. The chips fly out past him, or if they lie in the hole,
+he sweeps them out with his bill and pelts again at the same place. The
+pair take turns at the work. Who knows how long they work before
+resting? Do they take turns of equal length? Does one work more than the
+other? A pair of flickers will dig about two inches in a day, the hole
+being nearly two and a half inches in diameter. A week or more is
+consumed in digging the nest, which, among the flickers, is commonly
+from ten to eighteen inches deep. The hole usually runs in horizontally
+for a few inches and then curves down, ending in a chamber large enough
+to make a comfortable nest for the mother and her babies.
+
+What a good time the little ones have in their hole! Rain and frost
+cannot chill them; no enemy but the red squirrel is likely to disturb
+them. There they lie in their warm, dark chamber, looking up at the ray
+of light that comes in the doorway, until at last they hear the
+scratching of their mother's feet as she alights on the outside of the
+tree and clambers up to feed them. What a piping and calling they raise
+inside the hole, and how they all scramble up the walls of their chamber
+and thrust out their beaks to be fed, till the old tree looks as if it
+were blossoming with little woodpeckers' hungry mouths!
+
+
+
+
+V
+
+HOW A FLICKER FEEDS HER YOUNG[1]
+
+
+[Footnote 1: Based upon the observations of Mr. William Brewster.]
+
+As the house of the woodpecker has no windows and the old bird very
+nearly fills the doorway when she comes home, it is hard to find out
+just how she feeds her little ones. But one of our best naturalists has
+had the opportunity to observe it, and has told what he saw.
+
+A flicker had built a nest in the trunk of a rather small dead tree
+which, after the eggs were hatched, was accidentally broken off just at
+the entrance hole. This left the whole cavity exposed to the weather;
+but it was too late to desert the nest, and impossible to remove the
+young birds to another nest.
+
+When first visited, the five little birds were blind, naked, and
+helpless. They were motherless, too. Some one must have killed their
+pretty mother; for she never came to feed them, and the father was
+taking all the care of his little family. When disturbed the little
+birds hissed like snakes, as is the habit of the callow young of
+woodpeckers, chickadees, and other birds nesting habitually in holes in
+trees. When they were older and their eyes were open, they made a
+clatter much like the noise of a mowing-machine, and loud enough to be
+heard thirty yards away.
+
+The father came at intervals of from twenty to sixty minutes to feed the
+little ones. He was very shy, and came so quietly that he would be first
+seen when he alighted close by with a low little laugh or a subdued but
+anxious call to the young. "Here I am again!" he laughed; or "Are you
+all right, children?" he called to them. "All right!" they would answer,
+clattering in concert like a two-horse mower.
+
+As soon as they heard him scratching on the tree-trunk, up they would
+all clamber to the edge of the nest and hold out their gaping mouths to
+be fed. Each one was anxious to be fed first, because there never was
+enough to go round. There was always one that, like the little pig of
+the nursery tale, "got none." When he came to the nest, the father would
+look around a moment, trying to choose the one he wanted to feed first.
+Did he always pick out the poor little one that had none the time
+before, I wonder?
+
+After the old bird had made his choice, he would bend over the little
+bird and drive his long bill down the youngster's throat as if to run
+it through him. Then the little bird would catch hold as tightly as he
+could and hang on while his father jerked him up and down for a second
+or a second and a half with great rapidity. What was he doing? He was
+pumping food from his own stomach into the little one's. Many birds feed
+their young in this way. They do not hold the food in their own mouths,
+but swallow and perhaps partially digest it, so that it shall be fit for
+the tender little stomachs.
+
+While the woodpecker was pumping in this manner his motions were much
+the same as when he drummed, but his tail twitched as rapidly as his
+head and his wings quivered. The motion seemed to shake his whole body.
+
+In two weeks from the time when the little birds were blind, naked,
+helpless nestlings they became fully feathered and full grown, able to
+climb up to the top of the nest, from which they looked out with
+curiosity and interest. At any noise they would slip silently back. A
+day or two later they left the old nest and began their journeys.
+
+No naturalist has been able to tell us whether other woodpeckers than
+the golden-winged flicker feed their young in this way; and little is
+known of the number of kinds of birds that use this method, but it is
+suspected that it is far more common than has ever been determined. If
+an old bird is seen to put her bill down a young one's throat and keep
+it there even so short a time as a second, it is probable that she is
+feeding the little one by regurgitation, that is, by pumping up food
+from her own stomach. Any bird seen doing this should be carefully
+watched. It has long been known that the domestic pigeon does this, and
+the same has been observed a number of times of the ruby-throated
+hummingbird. A California lady has taken some remarkable photographs of
+the Anna's hummingbird in the act, showing just how it is done.
+
+
+
+
+VI
+
+FRIEND DOWNY
+
+
+No better little bird comes to our orchards than our friend the downy
+woodpecker. He is the smallest and one of the most sociable of our
+woodpeckers,--a little, spotted, black-and-white fellow, precisely like
+his larger cousin the hairy, except in having the outer tail-feathers
+barred instead of plain. Nearly everything that can be said of one is
+equally true of the other on a smaller scale. They look alike, they act
+alike, and their nests and eggs are alike in everything but size.
+
+Downy is the most industrious of birds. He is seldom idle and never in
+mischief. As he does not fear men, but likes to live in orchards and in
+the neighborhood of fields, he is a good friend to us. On the farm he
+installs himself as Inspector of Apple-trees. It is an old and an
+honorable profession among birds. The pay is small, consisting only of
+what can be picked up, but, as cultivated trees are so infested with
+insects that food is always plentiful, and as they have usually a
+dead branch suitable to nest in, Downy asks no more. Summer and winter
+he works on our orchards. At sunrise he begins, and he patrols the
+branches till sunset. He taps on the trunks to see whether he can hear
+any rascally borers inside. He inspects every tree carefully in a
+thorough and systematic way, beginning low down and following up with a
+peek into every crevice and a tap upon every spot that looks suspicious.
+If he sees anything which ought not to be there, he removes it at once.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+A moth had laid her eggs in a crack in the bark, expecting to hatch out
+a fine brood of caterpillars: but Downy ate them all, thus saving a
+whole branch from being overrun with caterpillars and left fruitless,
+leafless, and dying. A beetle had just deposited her eggs here. Downy
+saw her, and took not only the eggs but the beetle herself. Those eggs
+would have hatched into boring larvae, which would have girdled and
+killed some of the branches, or have burrowed under the bark, causing it
+to fall off, or have bored into the wood and, perhaps, have killed the
+tree. Nor is the full-grown borer exempt. Downy hears him, pecks a few
+strokes, and harpoons him with unerring aim. When Downy has made an
+arrest in this way, the prisoner does not escape from the police. Here
+is a colony of ants, running up the tree in one line and down in
+another, touching each other with their feelers as they pass. A feast
+for our friend! He takes both columns, and leaves none to tell the tale.
+This is a good deed, too, since ants are of no benefit to fruit-trees
+and are very fond of the dead-ripe fruit.
+
+And Downy is never too busy to listen for borers. They are fine plump
+morsels much to his taste, not so sour as ants, nor so hard-shelled as
+beetles, nor so insipid as insects' eggs. A good borer is his preferred
+dainty. The work he does in catching borers is of incalculable benefit,
+for no other bird can take his place. The warblers, the vireos, and some
+other birds in summer, the chickadees and nuthatches all the year round,
+are helping to eat up the eggs and insects that lie near the surface,
+but the only birds equipped for digging deep under the bark and dragging
+forth the refractory grubs are the woodpeckers.
+
+So Downy works at his self-appointed task in our orchards summer and
+winter, as regular as a policeman on his beat. But he is much more than
+a policeman, for he acts as judge, jury, jailer, and jail. All the
+evidence he asks against any insect is to find him loafing about the
+premises. "I swallow him first and find out afterwards whether he was
+guilty," says Downy with a wink and a nod.
+
+Most birds do not stay all the year, in the North, at least, and most,
+in return for their labors in the spring, demand some portion of the
+fruit or grain of midsummer and autumn. Not so Downy. His services are
+entirely gratuitous; he works twice as long as most others. He spends
+the year with us, no winter ever too severe for him, no summer too hot;
+and he never taxes the orchard, nor takes tribute from the berry patch.
+Only a quarter of his food is vegetable, the rest being made up of
+injurious insects; and the vegetable portion consists entirely of wild
+fruits and weed-seeds, nothing that man eats or uses. Downy feeds on the
+wild dogwood berries, a few pokeberries, the fruit of the woodbine, and
+the seeds of the poison-ivy,--whatever scanty and rather inferior fare
+is to be had at Nature's fall and winter table. If in the cold winter
+weather we will take pains to hang out a bone with some meat on it, raw
+or cooked, or a piece of suet, taking care that it is not salted,--for
+few wild birds except the crossbills can eat salted food,--we may see
+how he appreciates our thoughtfulness. Shall we grudge him a bone from
+our own abundance, or neglect to fasten it firmly out of reach of the
+cat and dog? If his cousin the hairy and his neighbor the chickadee
+come and eat with him, bid them a hearty welcome. The feast is spread
+for all the birds that help men, and friend Downy shall be their host.
+
+
+
+
+VII
+
+PERSONA NON GRATA
+
+
+We shall not attempt to deny that Downy has an unprincipled relative.
+While it is no discredit, it is a great misfortune to Downy, who is
+often murdered merely because he looks a little, a very little, like
+this disreputable cousin of his. The real offender is the sapsucker,
+that musical genius of whom we have already spoken.
+
+The popular belief is that every woodpecker is a sapsucker, and that
+every hole he digs in a tree is an injury to the tree. We have seen that
+every hole Downy digs is a benefit, and now we wish to learn why it is
+that the sapsucker's work is any more injurious than other woodpeckers'
+holes; how we are to recognize the sapsucker's work; and how much damage
+he does. We will do what the scientists often do,--examine the bird's
+work and make it tell us the story. There is no danger of hurting the
+sapsucker's reputation. The farmer could have no worse opinion of him;
+and, though the case has been appealed to the higher courts of science
+more than once, where the sapsucker's cause has been eloquently and
+ably defended, the verdict has gone against him. Scientists now do not
+deny that the sapsucker does harm. But his worst injury is less in the
+damage he does to the trees than in the ill-will and suspicion he
+creates against woodpeckers which do no harm at all. If you will study
+the picture and the descriptions in the Key to the Woodpeckers, you will
+be able to recognize the sapsucker and his nearest relatives, whether in
+the East or in the West. But all sapsuckers may be known by their pale
+yellowish under parts, and by the work they leave behind. As the
+yellow-bellied sapsucker is the only one found east of the Rocky
+Mountains, we shall speak only of him and his work.
+
+[Illustration: Work of Sapsucker.]
+
+Here is a specimen of the yellow-bellied sapsucker's work which I picked
+up under the tree from which it had fallen. We do not need to inquire
+whether the tree was injured by its falling, for we know that the loss
+of sound and healthy bark is always a damage. Was this sound bark? Yes,
+because it is still firm and new. The sap in it dried quickly,
+showing that neither disease nor worms caused it to fall; it is clean
+and hard on the back, showing that it came from a live tree, not from a
+dead, rotting log.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+How do I know that a bird caused it to fall? The marks are precisely
+such as are always left by a woodpecker's bill. How do I know that it
+was a sapsucker's work? Because no other woodpecker has the habit which
+characterizes the sapsucker, of sinking holes in straight lines. The
+sapsuckers drill lines of holes sometimes around and sometimes up and
+down the tree-trunk, but almost always in rings or belts about the trunk
+or branches. A girdle may be but a single line of holes, or it may
+consist of four or five, or more, lines. Sometimes a band will be two
+feet wide; and as many as eight hundred holes have been counted on the
+trunk of a single tree. Such extensive peckings, however, are to be
+expected only on large forest trees. Most fruit and ornamental trees are
+girdled a few times about the trunk, and about the principal branches
+just below the nodes, or forks.
+
+Why did the bird dig these holes? There are three things that he might
+have obtained,--sap, the inner bark, and boring larvae. Some naturalists
+have suggested a fourth as possible,--the insects that would be
+attracted by the sap.
+
+We will see what the piece of bark tells us. It is four and a half
+inches long, by an inch and a half wide, and its area of six and three
+fourths square inches has forty-four punctures. Does this look as if the
+bird were digging grubs? Do borers live in such straight little streets?
+The number and arrangement of the holes show that he was not seeking
+borers, while the naturalists tell us that he never eats a borer unless
+by accident. What did he get? Undoubtedly he pecked away some of the
+inner bark. All these holes are much larger on the back side of the
+specimen than on the outer surface. While the damp inner bark would
+shrink a little on exposure to the air, we know that it could not shrink
+as much as this; and investigation has shown that the sapsucker feeds
+largely on just such food, for it has been found in his stomach. Two
+other possible food-substances remain,--sap and insects. We know that
+the sapsucker eats many insects, but it is impossible to prove that he
+intended these holes for insect lures. Sap he might have gotten from
+them, if he wished it. We know that the white birch is full of excellent
+sap, from which can be made a birch candy, somewhat bitter, but nearly
+as good as horehound candy. The rock and red maples and the white canoe
+birch are the only trees in our Northern forests from which we make
+candy. A strong probability that our bird wanted sap is indicated by the
+arrangement of the holes. Usually he drills his holes in rings around
+the tree-trunk, but in this instance his longest lines of holes are
+vertical. If our sapsucker was drilling for sap, he arranged his holes
+so that it would almost run into his mouth, lazy bird!
+
+Our piece of bark has taught us:--
+
+That the sapsucker injured this tree.
+
+That he was not after grubs.
+
+That he got, and undoubtedly ate, the soft inner bark of the tree.
+
+That he got, and may have drunk, the sap.
+
+We could not infer any more from a single instance, but the naturalists
+assure us that the bird is in the habit of injuring trees, that he never
+eats grubs intentionally, and that he eats too much bark for it to be
+regarded as taken accidentally with other food. About the sap they
+cannot be so sure, as it digests very quickly. There remain two points
+to prove: whether the sapsucker drills his holes for the sake of the
+sap, or for insects attracted by the sap, provided that he eats anything
+but the inner bark.
+
+Our little specimen can tell us no more, but two mountain ash trees
+which were intimate acquaintances of mine from childhood can go on with
+the story. Do not be surprised that I speak of them as friends; the
+naturalist who does not make _friends_ of the creatures and plants about
+will hear few stories from them. These trees would not tell this tale to
+any one but an intimate acquaintance. Let us hear what they have to say
+about the sapsucker.
+
+There are in the garden of my old home two mountain ash trees,
+thirty-six years of age, each having grown from a sprout that sprang up
+beside an older tree cut down in 1863. They stand not more than two rods
+apart; have the same soil, the same amount of sun and rain, the same
+exposure to wind, and equal care. During all the years of my childhood
+one was a perfectly healthy tree, full of fruit in its season, while the
+other bore only scanty crops, and was always troubled with cracked and
+scaling bark. To-day the unhealthy tree is more vigorous than ever
+before, while its formerly stalwart brother stands a mere wreck of its
+former life and beauty. What should be the cause of such a remarkable
+change when all conditions of growth have remained the same?
+
+I admit that there is some internal difference in the trees, for all the
+birds tell me of it. One has always borne larger and more abundant fruit
+than the other, but this is no reason why the birds should strip all
+the berries from that tree before eating any from the other. When we
+know that the favorite tree stands directly in front of the windows of a
+much-used room and overhangs a frequented garden path, the preference
+becomes more marked. But robins, grosbeaks, purple finches, and the
+whole berry-eating tribe agree to choose one and neglect the other, and
+even the spring migrants will leave the gay red tassels of fruit still
+swinging on one tree, to scratch over the leaves and eat the fallen
+berries that lie beneath the other. My own taste is not keen in choosing
+between bitter berries, but the birds all agree that there is a decided
+difference in these trees,--did agree, I should say, for their favorite
+is the tree that is dying. Evidently this is a question of taste. It is
+interesting to observe that the sapsucker, which was never seen to touch
+the fruit of the trees, agrees with the fruit-eating birds. Nearly all
+his punctures were in the tree now dying. Is there a difference in the
+taste of the sap? Does the taste of the sap affect the taste of the
+fruit? Or is it merely a question of quantity? If he comes for sap, he
+prefers one tree to the other on the score either of better quality or
+greater quantity.
+
+We will discuss later whether it is sap that he wishes: all that now
+concerns us is to note that the internal difference, whatever it is, is
+in favor of the tree that is dying; while the only external difference
+appears to be the marks left by the sapsucker. While one tree is
+sparingly marked by him, the other is tattooed with his punctures,
+placed in single rings and in belts around trunk and branches beneath
+every fork. It is a law of reasoning that, when every condition but one
+is the same and the effects are different, the one exceptional condition
+is the _cause_ of the difference. If these trees are alike in everything
+except the work of the sapsucker (the only internal difference
+apparently _offsetting_ his work in part), what inference do we draw as
+to the effect of his work?
+
+We presume that he is killing the tree, without as yet knowing how he
+does it. What is his object? Good observers have stated that he draws a
+little sap in order to attract flies and wasps; that the sap is not
+drawn for its own sake, but as a bait for insects. Is this theory true?
+
+The first objection is that it is improbable. The sapsucker is a
+retiring, woodland bird that would hesitate to come into a town garden a
+mile away from the nearest woods unless to get something he could not
+find in the woods. Had he wanted insects, he would have tapped a tree
+in the woods, or else he would have caught them in his usual flycatching
+fashion. There must have been something about the mountain ash tree that
+he craved. As it is a very rare tree in the vicinity of my home, the
+sapsucker's only chance to satisfy his longing was by coming to some
+town garden like our own.
+
+Not only is the theory improbable, but it fails to explain the
+sapsucker's actions in this instance. In twenty years he was never seen
+to catch an insect that was attracted by the sap he drew. This does not
+deny that he may have caught insects now and then, but it does deny that
+he set the sap running for a lure. As he was never far away, and was
+sometimes only four and a half feet by measure from a chamber window,
+all that he did could be seen. He did not catch insects at his holes. He
+drank sap and ate bark.
+
+Finally, the theory is not only improbable and inadequate, but in this
+instance it is impossible. I do not remember seeing a sapsucker in the
+tree in the spring; if he came in the summer, it must have been at rare
+intervals; but he was always there in the fall, when the leaves were
+dropping. At that season the insect hordes had been dispersed by the
+autumnal frosts, so that we know he did not come for insects.
+
+In the many years during which I watched the sapsuckers--for there were
+undoubtedly a number of different birds that came, although never more
+than one at a time--there was such a curious similarity in their actions
+that it is entirely proper to speak as if the same bird returned year
+after year. His visits, as I have said, were usually made at the same
+season. He would come silently and early, with the evident intention of
+making this an all-day excursion. By eight o'clock he would be seen
+clinging to a branch and curiously observant of the dining-room window,
+which at that hour probably excited both his interest and his alarm.
+Early in the day he showed considerable activity, flitting from limb to
+limb and sinking a few holes, three or four in a row, usually _above_
+the previous upper girdle of the limbs he selected to work upon. After
+he had tapped several limbs he would sit waiting patiently for the sap
+to flow, lapping it up quickly when the drop was large enough. At first
+he would be nervous, taking alarm at noises and wheeling away on his
+broad wings till his fright was over, when he would steal quietly back
+to his sap-holes. When not alarmed, his only movement was from one row
+of holes to another, and he tended them with considerable regularity. As
+the day wore on he became less excitable, and clung cloddishly to his
+tree-trunk with ever increasing torpidity, until finally he hung
+motionless as if intoxicated, tippling in sap, a disheveled, smutty,
+silent bird, stupefied with drink, with none of that brilliancy of
+plumage and light-hearted gayety which made him the noisiest and most
+conspicuous bird of our April woods.
+
+Our mountain ash trees have told us several facts about the sapsucker:--
+
+That he did not come to eat insects.
+
+That he did come to drink sap, and that he probably ate the inner bark
+also.
+
+That he drank the sap because he liked it, not for some secondary
+object, as insects.
+
+That he could detect difference in the quality or quantity of the sap,
+which caused him to prefer a particular tree.
+
+That this difference apparently was in the taste of the sap, and that
+the effects of a day's drinking of mountain ash sap seemed to indicate
+some intoxicant or narcotic quality in the sap of that particular tree.
+
+That the effect of his work upon the tree was apparently injurious, as
+it is the only cause assigned of a healthy tree's dying before a less
+healthy one of the same age and species, subject all its life to the
+same conditions.
+
+So much we have learned about this sapsucker's habits, and now we should
+like to know why his work is harmful, and why that of the other
+woodpeckers is not. It is not because he drinks the sap. All the sap he
+could eat or waste would not harm the tree, if allowed to run out of a
+few holes. Think how many gallons the sugar-makers drain out of a single
+tree without killing the tree. But the sugar-maker takes the sap in the
+spring, when the crude sap is mounting up in the tree, while the
+sapsucker does not begin his work till midsummer or autumn, when the
+tree is sending down its elaborated sap to feed the trunk and make it
+grow. This accounts for the woodpecker's digging his pits _above_ the
+lines of the holes already in the tree. The loss of this elaborated sap
+is a greater injury than the waste of a far larger quantity of crude
+sap, so that on the season of the year when the sapsucker digs his holes
+depends in large measure the amount of damage he does. The injury that
+he does to the wood itself is trivial. He is not a wood_pecker_ except
+at time of nesting, and most woodpeckers prefer to build in a dead or
+dying branch, where their work does no hurt. But we know very well that
+a tree may be a wreck, riven from top to bottom by lightning, split open
+to the heart by the tempest, entirely hollow the whole length of its
+trunk, and yet may flourish and bear fruit. The tree lives in its outer
+layers. It may be crippled in almost any way, if the bark is left
+uninjured; but if an inch of bark is cut out entirely around the tree,
+it will die, for the sap can no longer run up and down to nourish it.
+
+This is the sapsucker's crime: he girdles the tree,--not at his first
+coming, nor yet at his second, not with one row of holes, nor yet with
+two; but finally, after years perhaps, when row after row of punctures,
+each checking a little the flow of sap, have overlapped and offset each
+other and narrowed the channels through which it could mount and
+descend, until the flow is stopped. Then the tree dies. It is not the
+holes he makes, nor the sap he draws, but the way he places his holes
+that makes the sapsucker an unwelcome visitor. For an unacceptable
+individual he is to the farmer,--_persona non grata_, as kings say of
+ambassadors who do not please their majesties. What shall we do with
+him, the only black sheep in all the woodpecker flock? Let him alone,
+unless we are positively sure that we know him from every other kind of
+woodpecker. The damage he does is trifling compared with what we should
+do if we made war upon other woodpeckers for some supposed wrong-doing
+of the sapsucker.
+
+
+
+
+VIII
+
+EL CARPINTERO
+
+
+In California and along the southwestern boundary of the United States
+lives a woodpecker known among the Mexicans as El Carpintero, the
+Carpenter.
+
+Carpentering is both his profession and his pastime, and he seems really
+to enjoy the work. When there is nothing more pressing to be done, he
+spends his time tinkering around, fitting acorns into holes in such
+great numbers and in so workmanlike a fashion that we do not know which
+is more remarkable, his patience or his skill. Every acorn is fitted
+into a separate hole made purposely for it, every one is placed butt end
+out and is driven in flush with the surface, so that a much frequented
+tree often appears as if studded with ornamental nails. "What an
+industrious bird!" we exclaim; but still it takes some time to
+appreciate how enormous is the labor of the Carpenter. Whole trees will
+sometimes be covered with his work, until a single tree has thousands of
+acorns bedded into its bark so neatly and tightly that no other
+creature can remove them.
+
+[Illustration: Work of Californian Woodpecker.]
+
+We may take for examination, from specimens of the Carpenter's work, a
+piece of spruce bark seven inches long by six wide, containing ten
+acorns and two empty holes. As spruce bark is so much harder and rougher
+than the pine bark in which he usually stores his nuts,[1] this
+specimen looks rough and unfinished, and even shows some acorns driven
+in sidewise; but for another reason I have preferred it to
+better-looking examples of his work for study. As we shall see later, it
+gives us a definite bit of information about the bird.
+
+[Footnote 1: They often use white-oak bark, fence-posts, telegraph
+poles, even the stalks of century-plants, when trees are not convenient.
+(Merriam, _Auk_, viii. 117.)]
+
+Think of the work of digging these twelve holes. Think of the labor of
+carrying these ten large acorns and driving them in so tightly that
+after years of shrinking they cannot be removed by a knife without
+injuring either the acorn or the bark. Yet how small a part of the
+woodpecker's year's work is here! How long could he live on ten acorns?
+How many must he gather for his winter's needs? How many must he lose by
+forgetting to come back to them? We cannot calculate the work a single
+bird does nor the nuts he eats, for several birds usually work in
+company and may use the same tree; but all the woodpeckers are large
+eaters, and the Californian has been singled out for special mention.
+
+Can we estimate the amount of work required to lay up one day's food?
+Judging by the amount of nuts some other birds will eat, I should
+think that all ten acorns contained in this piece of bark could be eaten
+in one day without surfeit. The estimate seems to me well inside of his
+probable appetite. I have experimented on this piece of bark, using a
+woodpecker's bill for a tool, and it takes me twenty minutes to dig a
+hole as large but not as neat as these. Doubtless it would not take the
+woodpecker as long; but at my rate of working, four hours were spent in
+digging these twelve holes. Then each acorn had to be hunted up and
+brought to the hole prepared for it. This entailed a journey, it may
+have been only from one tree to another, or it may have been, and very
+likely was, a considerable flight. For these acorns grew on oak-trees,
+and we find them driven into the bark of pines and spruces.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+This it is which gives our specimen its particular interest. While oaks
+and pines may be intermingled, though they naturally prefer different
+soils and situations, and in the Rocky Mountains the pine-belt lies
+above the oak region, spruce and oak trees do not grow in the same soil.
+The spruce-belt stands higher up than the pine. As these nuts are stored
+in the bark of a spruce-tree, we have clear evidence that the bird must
+have carried them some distance. For every nut he made the whole
+journey back and forth, since he could carry but one at a time,--ten
+long trips back and forth, certainly consuming several minutes each.
+
+Then each acorn had to be fitted to its hole. We have already spoken of
+the accuracy with which this is done, so that the Carpenter's work is a
+standing taunt to the hungry jays and squirrels which would gladly eat
+his nuts if they could get them. A careful observer tells us that when
+the hole is too small, the woodpecker takes the acorn out and makes the
+hole a little larger, working so cautiously, however, that he sometimes
+makes several trials before the acorn can be fitted and driven in flush
+with the bark. Some of these acorns show cracks down the sides, as if
+they had been split either in forcibly pulling them out of a hole not
+deep enough for them, or in driving them when green and soft into a hole
+too small for them. Of course after each trial the acorn must be hunted
+up where it lies on the ground and driven in again, and this takes
+considerable time.
+
+As nearly as we can estimate it, not less than half a day must have been
+spent in putting these acorns where we find them. With smaller acorns,
+stored in pine bark, less time would have been required; but weeks, if
+not months, of work are spent in laying up the winter's stores.
+
+How the woodpecker's back and jaws must have ached! Surely he is human
+enough to get tired with his work, and it is not play to do what this
+bird has done. Some of the acorns measure seven tenths of an inch in
+diameter by nine tenths in length, and the bird that carried them is
+smaller than a robin. How he must have hurried to reach his tree when
+the acorn was extra large! Yet he took time to drive every one in point
+foremost. Even those that lie upon their sides must have been forced
+into position by tapping the butt. He knows very well which end of an
+acorn is which, does our Carpenter.
+
+But what is the use of all this work? Why, if he wants acorns, does he
+not eat them as they lie scattered under the oaks, instead of taking
+pains to carry them away and put them into holes for the fun of eating
+them out of the holes afterward? The absurdity of this has led some
+people to surmise that the Carpenter chooses none but weevilly acorns,
+and stores them that the grub inside may grow large and fat and
+delicious. This would be very interesting, if it were true. There must
+of course be more weevilly acorns on the ground than he picks up, so
+that he could get as many grubs without taking all this trouble, and
+there is no reason why they should not be as large and good as those
+hatched out in holes in trees. When I wish to keep nuts sweet, I spread
+them out on the attic floor in the sun and air, keeping them where they
+will not touch each other. The Carpenter does practically the same
+thing. Is it probable that he tries to raise a fine crop of grubs in
+this way? If so, one or the other of us is doing just the wrong thing.
+But if weevils are what the Carpenter wants, then the nuts in the bark
+should be wormy; yet only two of them show any sign of a weevil, and of
+these one appears from its dull color and weather-beaten look to be a
+nut deposited several years before the others by some other woodpecker.
+Every other acorn is as hard, shining, and bright colored as when it
+fell from the tree. Evidently the bird picked these nuts up while they
+were fresh and good; perhaps he chose them _because_ they were good and
+fresh. The possibility becomes almost a certainty when we observe that
+naturalists agree that the Carpenter uses no acorns but the
+sweet-tasting species. Now there are likely to be as many grubs in one
+kind of an acorn as in another, and he would scarcely refuse any kind
+that contained them, if grubs were what he wanted. The fact that he
+takes sweet acorns, and those only, shows that it is the meat of the nut
+that he wants. And all good naturalists agree that it is the kernel
+itself that he eats.
+
+Why he stores them is not hard to decide when we remember that the
+Californian woodpecker, over a large part of his range, is a mountain
+bird. Though we think of California as the land of sunshine, it is not
+universal summer there. The mountain ranges have a winter as severe as
+that of New England, with a heavy snowfall. When the snow lies several
+feet deep among the pines and spruces of the uplands, the Carpenter is
+not distressed for food: his pantry is always above the level of the
+snow; he need neither scratch a meagre living from the edges of the
+snow-banks, nor go fasting. His fall's work has provided him not only
+with the necessities, but with the luxuries of life.
+
+But why does he spend so much time in making holes? He might tuck his
+nuts into some natural crevice in the oak bark, or drop them into
+cavities which all birds know so well where to find. And leave them
+where any pilfering jay would be able to pick them out at his ease? Or
+put them in the track of every wandering squirrel? Jays and squirrels
+are never too honest to refuse to steal, but they find it harder to get
+the woodpecker's stores out of his pine-tree pantry than to pick up
+honest acorns of their own. So, like the woodpecker, they lay up their
+own stores of nuts, and feed on them in winter, or go hungry.
+
+We have had very little aid from anything except the piece of bark we
+were studying, yet we have learned that the Californian woodpecker is a
+good carpenter; that he works hard at his trade; that he shows
+remarkable foresight in collecting his food, much ingenuity in housing
+it, good judgment in putting it where his enemies cannot get it, and
+wisdom in the plan he has adopted to give him a good supply of fresh
+nuts at a season when the autumn's crop is buried under the deep snow.
+
+If I were a Californian boy, I think I should spend my time in trying to
+find out more about this wise woodpecker, concerning which much remains
+to be discovered.
+
+
+
+
+IX
+
+A RED-HEADED COUSIN
+
+
+Besides his half-brothers, the narrow-fronted and ant-eating
+woodpeckers, the Carpenter has a numerous family of cousins,--the
+red-headed, the red-bellied, the golden-fronted, the Gila,[1] and the
+Lewis's woodpeckers. These all belong to one genus, and are much alike
+in structure, though totally different in color. Most of them are
+Western or Southwestern birds, but one is found in nearly all parts of
+the United States lying between the Hudson River and the Rocky
+Mountains, and is the most abundant woodpecker of the middle West. This
+well-known cousin is the red-headed woodpecker, the tricolored beauty
+that sits on fence-posts and telegraph poles, and sallies out, a blaze
+of white, steel-blue, and scarlet, a gorgeous spectacle, whenever an
+insect flits by. He is the one that raps so merrily on your tin roofs
+when he feels musical.
+
+[Footnote 1: So named from being found along the Gila River.]
+
+In many ways the red-head, as he is familiarly called, is like his
+carpenter cousin. Both indulge in long-continued drumming; both catch
+flies expertly on the wing; and both have the curious habit of laying up
+stores of food for future use. The Californian woodpecker not only
+stores acorns, but insect food as well. But though the Carpenter's
+habits have long been known, it is a comparatively short time since the
+red-head was first detected laying up winter supplies.
+
+The first to report this habit of the red-head was a gentleman in South
+Dakota, who one spring noticed that they were eating _young_
+grasshoppers. At that season he supposed that all the insects of the
+year previous would be dead or torpid, and certainly full-grown, while
+those of the coming summer would be still in the egg. Where could the
+bird find half-grown grasshoppers? Being interested to explain this, he
+watched the red-heads until he saw that one went frequently to a post,
+and appeared to get something out of a crevice in its side. In that post
+he found nearly a hundred grasshoppers, still alive, but wedged in so
+tightly they could not escape. He also found other hiding-places all
+full of grasshoppers, and discovered that the woodpeckers lived upon
+these stores nearly all winter.
+
+But it is not grasshoppers only that the red-head hoards, though he
+is very fond of them. In some parts of the country it is easier to find
+nuts than to find grasshoppers, and they are much less perishable food.
+The red-head is very fond of both acorns and beechnuts. Probably he eats
+chestnuts also. Who knows how many kinds of nuts the red-head eats? You
+might easily determine not only what he will eat, but what he prefers,
+if a red-headed woodpecker lives near you. Lay out different kinds of
+nuts on different days, putting them on a shed roof, or in some place
+where squirrels and blue jays would not be likely to dare to steal them,
+and see whether he takes all the kinds you offer. Then lay out mixed
+nuts and notice which ones he carries off first. If he takes all of one
+kind before he takes any of the others, we may be sure that he has
+discovered his favorite nut. Such little experiments furnish just the
+information which scientific men are glad to get.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+It is well known that the red-head is very fond of beechnuts. Every
+other year we expect a full crop of nuts, and close observation shows
+that the red-heads come to the North in much larger numbers and stay
+much later on these years of plenty than on the years of scanty crops.
+Lately it has been discovered that they not only eat beechnuts all the
+fall, but store them up for winter use. This time the observation was
+made in Indiana. There, when the nuts were abundant, the red-heads were
+seen busily carrying them off. Their accumulations were found in all
+sorts of places: cavities in old tree-trunks contained nuts by the
+handful; knot-holes, cracks, crevices, seams in the barns were filled
+full of nuts. Nuts were tucked into the cracks in fence-posts; they were
+driven into railroad ties; they were pounded in between the shingles on
+the roofs; if a board was sprung out, the space behind it was filled
+with nuts, and bark or wood was often brought to cover over the gathered
+store. No doubt children often found these hiding-places and ate the
+nuts, thinking they were robbing some squirrel's hoard.
+
+In the South, where the beech-tree is replaced by the oak, the red-heads
+eat acorns. I should like to know whether they store acorns as they do
+beechnuts. Are chestnuts ever laid up for winter? How far south is the
+habit kept up? Is it observed beyond the limits of a regular and
+considerable snowfall? That is, do the birds lay up their nuts in order
+to keep them out of the snow, or for some other reason?
+
+It remains to be discovered if other woodpeckers have hoarding-places.
+We know that the sapsucker eats beechnuts, and the downy and the hairy
+woodpeckers also; that the red-bellied woodpecker and the golden-winged
+flicker eat acorns; and I have seen the downy woodpecker eating
+chestnuts, or the grubs in them, hanging head downward at the very tip
+of the branches like a chickadee. It may be possible that some of these
+lay up winter stores.
+
+[Illustration: Head of the Lewis's Woodpecker.]
+
+It is known that the Lewis's woodpecker occasionally shows signs of a
+hoarding instinct. It was recently noted that in the San Bernardino
+Mountains of California the Lewis's woodpecker, after driving away the
+smaller Californian woodpeckers, tried to put acorns into the holes the
+Carpenter had made, but, being unused to the work, did it very clumsily.
+Soon after this observation was published, a boy friend living near
+Denver told me that a short time before he had seen a woodpecker that
+had a large quantity of acorns shelled and broken into quarters, on
+which he was feeding. This woodpecker was identified beyond a doubt as
+the Lewis's woodpecker. So we begin to suspect that the habit of storing
+up food is not an uncommon one among the woodpeckers.
+
+
+
+
+X
+
+A STUDY OF ACQUIRED HABITS
+
+
+Something interesting yet remains to be discovered of the hoarding habit
+of the red-head. How strange that so familiar a bird should have a habit
+so easily detected, and yet that no one in all these years should speak
+of it! Who does not know how mice and chipmunks hide their food? Who has
+not watched the blue jay skulking off to hide an acorn where he will be
+sure to forget it? Who does not remember the articles his pet Jim Crow
+stole and lost to him forever? The hoarding habit has long been observed
+of many dull-colored, rare, or insignificant creatures. That one so
+noisy, gay-colored, tame, and abundant as our red-headed woodpecker
+should have the same habit and escape observation is certainly
+remarkable. But though it is over twenty years since the storing of
+grasshoppers was recorded and twelve since the practice of laying up
+beechnuts was observed, very little seems to have been learned of the
+habit since these records were made.
+
+There are two points to be considered: the habit long remained unknown;
+after it was discovered, it was long in being reaffirmed. It seems that,
+if it were a general habit, more would be known about it. Now if it is
+not a universal habit, it must be one of two alternatives, either a
+custom falling into disuse, or a new one just being acquired. That a
+habit so remarkable and so advantageous should be discarded after being
+universal is scarcely possible; that a habit so noticeable, if it were
+general, should remain unknown is improbable; that a habit which made
+life in winter both secure and easy should, if introduced by a few
+enterprising birds, become a universal custom, is not without a
+parallel. The probabilities point to the custom of hoarding food as a
+recently _acquired habit_.
+
+Acquired habits are not rare among birds. The chimney swift has learned
+to nest in chimneys since the Pilgrims landed; for there were no
+chimneys before that time. There is the evidence of old writers to show
+that they acquired the habit within fifty years of the time of the first
+permanent settlements in New England. The eaves swallow learned to
+transfer its nest from the side of a cliff to the side of a barn in less
+time. Most birds will change their food as soon as a new dainty is
+procurable, and they will even invent methods of getting it, if it is
+much to their taste. The way the English sparrows have learned to tear
+open corn husks so as to eat the corn in the milk is a good example, for
+our maize does not grow in England, and they have had to learn about its
+good qualities in the few years since they have become established
+outside of the cities. Yet it is already a well-established habit. So
+quickly does a habit spread from one bird to another, until it becomes
+the rule instead of the exception! Acquired habits always show
+adaptability, and often much forethought and reason. It is the shrewd
+bird that learns new tricks.
+
+Now there is not known among birds any evidence of greater forethought
+and reason than working hard in pleasant weather, when food is plentiful
+beyond all hope of ever exhausting it, to lay up provision for winter.
+How does the woodpecker know that winter will come this year? That there
+was a winter last year and the year before does not make it certain, but
+only probable, that there will be one this year. We cannot know
+ourselves that the seasons will change until we learn enough of
+astronomy to understand the proof. Nor does instinct explain the habit,
+as some would declare: since not all red-heads have the habit, though
+all must have instinct. It would seem as if memory and reason had
+devised this plan for outwitting winter, the bird's old enemy.
+
+The red-head is not a grub-eating woodpecker. Though beetles make up a
+third of his food, their larvae do not form any part of it. Half his food
+for the entire year is vegetable, and the animal portion is composed
+principally of beetles, ants, caterpillars, and grasshoppers, which in
+winter time are hidden in snug places, or are dead under the snow. There
+are few berries in winter. The few seedy, weedy plants that stick up
+above the snow give to the birds the little they have; but the
+red-head's vegetable fare is limited at that season and his animal food
+almost lacking. Winter in the North is all very well for the hairy and
+downy cousins that like to hammer frozen tree-trunks for frozen grubs;
+but our red-headed friend does not eat grubs by preference. Rather than
+change his habits he will change his boarding-place. So he is a
+migratory woodpecker, though the woodpeckers are naturally home-loving
+birds, and do not migrate from preference. If, however, he can lay up a
+store of vegetable or animal food, he can winter in any climate.
+Hoarding is thus an invention as important to the woodpecker world as
+electric cars and telephones are to men. The probabilities are that
+this is a recent improvement in the red-head's ways of living.
+
+Another set of facts increases the probabilities of our supposition. It
+is a very delicate subject to handle because it affects the reputation
+of a family in good standing; but there is positive proof that sometimes
+the red-head has been guilty of crimes which would give a man a full
+column in the newspapers with staring headlines. If such deeds were not
+a thousand times less common among woodpeckers than they are among men
+the red-head would be declared an outlaw. He has been proved to be a
+hen-roost robber, a murderer, and a cannibal. In Florida he has sucked
+hen's eggs. In Iowa he has been seen to kill a duckling. There is a
+record in Ohio that he pecked holes in the walls of the eaves swallow's
+nest and stole all the eggs, and that he was finally killed in the act
+of robbing a setting hen's nest. Within the space of fifteen years, from
+Montana, Georgia, Colorado, New York, and Ontario, in addition to the
+records mentioned already from Florida, Ohio, and Iowa, come accounts of
+his stealing birds' eggs and murdering and eating other birds. The
+evidence is indisputable.
+
+It is charity to suppose that this is the work of natural criminals, or
+of degenerate, under-witted, or demented woodpeckers. Why should there
+not be such individuals among birds? One point is certain: so notable a
+habit could not long escape detection, since it is a barnyard crime. He
+who robs hen's nests gets caught--if he is a bird. Either these
+occurrences are very rare, not seen because of their extreme rarity, or
+they indicate a new custom just coming in. And the same is true of the
+habit of hoarding food; it is rare, or it is new.
+
+The frequency of such occurrences can be determined only by observation;
+but the time of their origin might be approximated in another way. If we
+could fix the date when the bird could not have done what he is now
+doing for simple lack of opportunity, we might say that the habit has
+been acquired since a certain date--as we have said of the English
+sparrow eating maize, of the chimney swift nesting in chimneys, and the
+cliff swallow building under the eaves. But we have no such help on the
+case of the red-head, which never has been without opportunities to get
+birds' eggs and to kill other birds.
+
+But there is a parallel case in another species where the date of an
+acquired habit can be proved. In Florida the red-bellied woodpecker has
+earned the names Orange Borer and Orange Sapsucker because he eats
+oranges. It is true that he is not charged with doing damage, because
+he attacks only the over-ripe and unmarketable fruit; it is known that
+the habit is not general yet, for even where the birds are abundant only
+a single bird or a pair will be found eating oranges, and always the
+same pair, proving that it is a habit not yet learned by all of the
+species; close observers declare, too, that it is but a few years since
+the bird took up the habit; and, finally, we know that this must be the
+case, for, though the wild orange was introduced by the Spaniards, the
+sweet fruit was not extensively cultivated until recently. Here is a
+habit which undoubtedly has been acquired within twenty years or so,
+which will in all probability increase until instead of being the
+exception it is the rule.
+
+Why may not the red-head's occasional cannibalism, unless this is mere
+individual degeneracy, and his more common custom of hoarding be habits
+that he is acquiring? Why, indeed, may not the Californian woodpecker's
+distinguishing trait be a habit which began like these among a few birds
+here and there, wiser or more progressive than the rest, and which in
+time became general and established? Why may not the two observed
+instances of the Lewis's woodpecker be examples of a similar habit just
+beginning? The very differences in their methods point to that
+explanation. The Lewis's woodpecker that had seen the Carpenter's work
+tried to imitate him; the one that lived outside his range adopted a way
+of his own, unnoticed before among woodpeckers, and shelled and
+quartered his nuts before he stored them.
+
+It is remarkable that these four woodpeckers are cousins; they belong to
+the same genus, and they have essentially the same structure, tastes,
+and habits. Why should it be strange if their minds were alike too? if
+they had a natural bent toward accumulativeness, and a natural desire to
+try new wrinkles? We are sure that one of them has acquired a new habit
+within a few years. Why may we not suppose as a basis and a spur to
+further investigation that the others also are acquiring ways new and
+strange?
+
+
+
+
+XI
+
+THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS BILL
+
+
+There is an old saying, "You may know a carpenter by his chips;" but,
+though chips are seldom long absent when a woodpecker is about, can we
+call the woodpecker a carpenter? Is he not both in his works and ways of
+working--with the one exception of the Californian woodpecker--more of a
+miner?
+
+For the carpenter takes pieces of wood, bit by bit, and joins them
+together till at last he has built a lofty skeleton or framework for his
+dwelling, which last of all he covers over and closes in; and the tools
+he uses are saw and hammer. With these alone he could build his house,
+though it might be neither very large nor very good. When a carpenter's
+house is finished, it is neither a cave nor a hole, but a pavilion built
+in the open air after the model of a spreading tree,--which frames a
+roof with its branches and shingles it with overlapping leaves. There is
+nothing in the woodpecker's way of building which corresponds to that.
+
+Quite different are the miner's methods. In the West, where the barren
+mountain sides stretch up into snowclad summits, on the face of slopes
+as seamed and gray and verdureless as the wrinkled trunk of an aged oak,
+I have seen holes where human woodpeckers burrow. The entrance to a mine
+half-way up a hillside looks strikingly like a woodpecker's hole and
+scarcely larger. Nor does the likeness vanish as we think how in their
+long tunnels inside their mountains of gold and iron and silver the
+delving miners are picking and prying and picking to lengthen their
+burrows just as the woodpeckers peck and pry and peck inside their
+wooden mountain, the tree-trunk. Which shall we call the woodpecker--a
+carpenter or a miner?
+
+What are the miner's tools? Pick and drill, are they not? What are the
+woodpecker's? The same. Certainly we shall see, if we stop to think,
+that it is not a chisel that he uses, as we sometimes say. A chisel is a
+knife driven by blows of a hammer; like a knife its effectiveness
+depends upon the sharpness and length of its cutting edge. But a
+woodpecker's bill is not a cutting tool. It is a wedge, but a wedge
+working on a different principle from a knife-edge. Look at this one and
+observe that, though strong and stout, it is not sharp and has no true
+cutting edge. It is a tapering, square-ended, flat-sided tool, rather
+six-sided at the base and holding its bevel and angles to the tip. The
+woodpecker's bill is a pick, not a chisel. It is used like a pick, being
+driven home with a heavy blow and getting its efficiency from its own
+weight and wedge-shape and from the force with which it is impelled.
+Watch the downy woodpecker at his work and see what sturdy blows he
+delivers, pausing after each one to aim and drive home another telling
+stroke. This is pick-axe work. But sometimes he rattles off a succession
+of taps so short and quick that they blend together in one continuous
+drumming, too light and quick to be likened to the ponderous swing of
+the pick-axe. Now he is drilling. The work of a drill is to cut out a
+small deep hole either by twirling (as in drilling metals) or by tapping
+(as in drilling stone). The woodpecker drills by the latter method and
+there is a curious likeness between his bill and the mason's tools.
+
+[Illustration: Head of Ivory-billed Woodpecker.]
+
+Any one who has lived in a granite country knows the deep round holes
+that stone masons make when they split rock. Did you ever wonder why
+they are as large at the bottom as at the top? If you remember the shape
+of a mason's drill, you will recollect that it looks a little like a
+stick of home-made molasses candy bitten off when it was just soft
+enough to stretch a little. The mason's drill is a round iron rod with a
+thin, flat end, sharpened on the edge and a little pointed in the
+centre. In the flattening of the sides and the width across the tip its
+end resembles that of a typical woodpecker's bill. The woodpeckers that
+drill for grubs, especially the largest, the logcock and the
+ivory-billed woodpecker, have the tip remarkably flattened. The likeness
+to the drill does not go farther because the woodpecker's bill is a
+combination tool; but it is drill-pointed rather than pick-pointed.
+
+What is the advantage of this compressed tip? Can the bird pick as well
+as he could with a sharp point? The bird and the mason reap the same
+benefit from this form of tool. A sharp-pointed drill would bind in the
+hole and could neither be driven ahead nor removed without difficulty,
+but the sharp-edged tool cuts a hole as wide as the instrument. There
+is, of course, some difference between working in stone and in wood, but
+the principle is the same. The mason strikes his drill with his hammer
+and cuts a crease in the stone; then lifts and turns the drill, cutting
+a crease in another direction; and so by continually changing the
+direction of the cuts until they radiate from a centre like the spokes
+of a wheel, he finally reduces a little circle of stone to a powder fine
+enough to be blown out of the hole. In drilling for a grub the
+woodpecker must do much the same thing. He wishes to keep his hole small
+at the top so as to save work, yet it must be large enough at the bottom
+to admit the borer when nipped between his mandibles; therefore he needs
+an instrument that, like a drill or a chisel, will cut a straight-sided
+hole. Indeed, we might call it a chisel just as well if it were not a
+double-wedge instead of a single wedge and if it did not move when it is
+struck instead of being held stationary beneath the blows.
+
+When he is digging his house the woodpecker uses his bill as a pick-axe.
+When he is digging for grubs he uses it as a drill. Now some species
+drill very little and some a great deal, according to the number of
+grubs they feed on; but all dig holes to nest in,--that is, all use
+their bills as picks but only a few employ them as drills. The flickers,
+for example, seldom drill for grubs, their food being picked up on the
+surface or dug from the earth; yet they excavate the deepest, roomiest
+holes made by any woodpeckers of their size; they use their bills
+effectively as pick-axes, but seldom, very seldom, as drills. And what
+do we find? No drill-point--not a truncate, compressed bill fit for
+drilling, but a sharper, pointed, rounded, _curving_ bill. Notice the
+ordinary pick-axe and see how much nearer the flicker's bill than the
+logcock's or the ivory-billed woodpecker's it is. Why is a flicker's
+bill better for being curved also? Why do the drilling woodpeckers have
+a perfectly straight bill? We should find by studying the birds and
+their food that there is a direct relation between the shape of the bill
+and the amount of drilling a woodpecker does; that the grub-eating or
+drilling woodpeckers have a straight bill, for working in small deep
+holes, while the flickers have a curved bill for prying out chips. And
+we should note that the flicker's bill is most like the ordinary bill of
+perching birds, while the drilling bill, as typified by the logcock's
+and the hairy woodpecker's bills, is a more specialized tool, limited to
+fewer uses, but more effective within its limits.
+
+There is another detail of the woodpecker's bills which casts light upon
+their habits. The species that drill most have their nostrils closely
+covered by little tufts of stiff feathers, scarcely more than bristles,
+which turn forward over the nostril. The density and the length of these
+tufts agree very well with the kind of work the woodpecker does; for in
+the hairy and the downy, which are continually drilling and raising a
+dust in rotten wood, they are very thick and noticeable, while in the
+red-head and the sapsucker they show as scarcely more than a few loose
+bristles, and in the flicker they barely cover the nostril. This seems a
+plain provision to keep the dust out of the bird's lungs; and we might
+cite as additional evidence the fact that the only other birds of
+similar tree-pecking habits, the nuthatches and the chickadees, have
+their nostrils protected in the same way. But we must always be cautious
+before drawing inferences of this sort to see what may be said on the
+other side. When we recollect that the crows and ravens and many kinds
+of finches, among other birds, none of which dig in the bark of trees or
+raise a dust, have their nostrils as completely covered, we see that we
+have perhaps discovered a _use_ for these nasal tufts but not the
+_cause_ of their being there. We must be careful not to mistake cause
+and accompaniment in our endeavor to explain differences in structure.
+
+Let us see what we have learned and how to interpret it:--
+
+That the woodpecker's bill is a combination of drill and pick-axe.
+
+That the shape varies with the use to which it is most commonly put.
+
+That the use varies with the food principally eaten; or, what is a step
+farther back, that the different kinds of food must be sought in
+different places and by different methods, and therefore require
+different tools.
+
+Therefore the shape of the woodpecker's bill has a direct relation to
+the kind of food he eats. Please notice that we do not assert that it
+_causes_ him to eat a certain kind of food nor that a certain diet may
+not have affected the shape of the bill, causing it to be what we now
+see. Both may be at least partially true, but to prove either or both
+would need profound study, and all that we have observed is that the
+shape of the woodpecker's bill is _adapted_ to his food and that it
+varies with the kind of food he eats, or, to be more exact, with his
+ways of procuring it.
+
+
+
+
+XII
+
+THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS FOOT
+
+
+We have studied the woodpecker's bill and have found that it is a very
+serviceable tool. We shall find that his feet are equally well adapted
+to their work.
+
+Here is the foot of a woodpecker. Observe how it differs from a
+chicken's foot, or a sparrow's foot. What is it that especially fits it
+for climbing? Perhaps you will notice that the tarsus is short, and you
+may be able to explain why it would be a disadvantage for a climbing
+bird to have long legs, as well as why it is a help for him to have long
+toes. Toes long and legs short is the rule with the woodpeckers.
+
+[Illustration: Foot of Woodpecker.]
+
+I never see a woodpecker's foot without thinking of an iceman's nippers
+with their short handles and long, sharp-toothed jaws. They are designed
+for similar uses,--to lift heavy weights by laying hold of smooth, flat
+surfaces. The iceman sets his nippers into the ice and lifts the block;
+but the bird sets his claws into the tree and lifts his own body.
+
+Suppose the nippers had one short jaw and one long one, would they then
+take as firm hold as they do with jaws of equal length? In perching
+birds the hind toe is much the shortest, but they sit balanced upon a
+limb and have merely to hold themselves in position. The woodpecker
+climbing a tree-trunk is out of balance; he would fall off unless he had
+a firm grip; and he could not get this firm hold if his hind toes were
+not long enough to give his foot a nearly equal spread back and forward.
+Other birds grasp a limb with the whole under surface of their toes, but
+the woodpecker when on a smooth, upright tree-trunk nips it only with
+his toenails. Try with your own hand to hold a stick as large and heavy
+as you can grasp, and you will see that when you clasp your hand around
+it as a perching bird takes hold of a perch, it makes little difference
+that the thumb is shorter than the fingers, but when you try to nip it
+with your finger tips alone, you must bend your fingers until they are
+not much longer than your thumb,--that is, a pair of nippers must be
+equal jawed.
+
+This simple illustration shows why the woodpecker's foot reaches as far
+backward as forward. But a sensible objection may be raised, namely,
+that as there are two hind toes of unequal length, it is by no means
+certain which is the more necessary.
+
+[Illustration: Diagram of right foot.]
+
+Scientists tell us that a woodpecker's foot, though it looks so unlike a
+chicken's, is really very much the same. When we ask how one of the
+front toes disappeared and how the extra hind toe came to be where it
+is, they tell us that there has been no addition and no loss, but the
+extra hind toe is only a front toe turned backward. They call it a
+_reversed fourth toe_. A bird's toes are numbered in order starting with
+the hind toe and going around the _inside_ of the foot to the outer or
+fourth toe. The hind toe is the thumb, and the others are numbered in
+the same order as the fingers of our hands. So we see that the
+woodpecker's real hind toe is rather small, like that of most birds. It
+looks very much as if it had been found _too_ small and as if another
+had turned back to help it do its work. Do you say that a bird cannot
+turn his toes about in this way? Most cannot, to be sure, but all of the
+owls can do it. An owl will sit either with two toes forward and two
+backward, or with three forward and one the other way. The owls have a
+reversible outer toe, and perhaps the woodpeckers did also before it
+became permanently reversed.
+
+[Illustration: Foot of Three-toed Woodpecker.]
+
+That this is exactly what had happened is curiously confirmed. There are
+a few woodpeckers in this country which have but three toes. They are
+the only North American land birds with less than four toes (though many
+sea and shore birds have but three). Compare this picture with a
+four-toed woodpecker's foot. One toe is gone completely, when or how no
+one can tell. But in some way the _first_ toe, the _thumb_, the one we
+always begin to count from, has disappeared. The one left is the
+reversed fourth toe, as we know by the number of joints in it.
+Undoubtedly this woodpecker needed a hind toe, but he must have needed a
+longer, stronger one than his natural first toe. A toe of the right
+length was supplied by turning one of the front toes back, and the short
+hind toe in some way disappeared.
+
+This may seem a roundabout way to show that a woodpecker's foot is a
+pair of nippers. First we studied nippers till we found out that they
+were not good nippers unless they were nearly equal-limbed. Next we
+studied the woodpecker's foot to learn about that extra hind toe. Then
+it occurred to us that four toes were not necessary, since some of our
+best climbers have but three. What was the essential point? Might it not
+be a foot equally divided without reference to the number of toes? But
+that is the principle of a pair of nippers. Then came the question, is
+there any similarity in their use? Yes, the nippers are used to lift
+heavy weights, and the woodpecker's foot is used to lift his heavy body
+in just the same way, by taking hold of a flat, smooth surface. We
+conclude that a wide-spread, equally divided, nipping foot would be the
+best device possible for the woodpecker's way of living, and we find by
+examination that every woodpecker shows this type of foot.
+
+There is additional evidence that this is the right explanation. Our
+only other North American birds that climb on the bark of trees
+professionally, as we may say, are the brown creepers and the
+nuthatches. In both these the tarsus is short, as we found it in the
+woodpeckers, and the hind toe and its claw are fully equal to the middle
+toe and claw, making an equally divided foot. On the other hand, the
+foot with two toes forward and two toes backward is confined neither to
+woodpeckers nor to climbing birds. The parrots, which climb after a
+fashion, have it; but so do the cuckoos, which do not climb, some of
+which, like our road-runner, or ground cuckoo of the West, are strictly
+terrestrial. The "yoking" of the toes may occur by the reversion of the
+fourth toe, as ordinarily, or of the second toe, as in the trogons; the
+arrangement appears to be definitely related to the distribution of the
+tendons that control the toes. But though accounting for the structure
+may give a clue to its descent, it does not justify its efficiency. The
+yoke-toed foot is not exclusively a climbing foot. All our families of
+climbers have at least one representative with but one toe behind, and
+this clearly proves that the yoke-toed structure is by no means
+necessary even though it may be an honorable inheritance among climbers.
+The natural conclusion is that the important point in climbing is not
+the number nor the arrangement of the toes, but the length of at least
+one hind toe so as to give an equally divided foot.
+
+There is an interesting point to notice about the woodpeckers. This
+reversed fourth toe is curiously variable in length. In the flickers,
+with its claw, it is a little shorter than the middle (third) toe with
+its claw; in the red-heads and their friends it a little exceeds the
+middle toe and claw; in the downy and the hairy it is much the longest
+toe, and in the ivory-billed woodpecker it is abnormally developed. We
+at once judge that it is some indication of the bird's manner of life,
+and we look for it to be largest in the species that live continually
+upon the trunks of trees, obtaining most of their food by drilling. We
+expect to see the finest development of drilling bill accompany this
+enormously developed toe, and we find them both in the ivory-billed
+woodpecker. In imagination we clearly see the use of it. The great bird,
+keen in his quest of grubs, sidling hastily round the tree, in an
+unsteady balance and unsupported by his tail, throws one long hind toe
+downward to steady himself, hooks the other into the bark above him, and
+hangs between the two as firmly supported as in his ordinary position.
+No doubt he does do this, but does it prove the supposition that the
+heaviest and most arboreal woodpeckers have the greatest development of
+the fourth toe? Not at all. There is our rare acquaintance the logcock,
+or pileated woodpecker, a bird nearly as large as the ivory-billed, one
+of the most persistent of our tree-climbers and more than any other
+woodpecker I ever observed given to scratching rapidly round and round a
+tree-trunk, clinging at ease in almost any position except
+head-downward, and drilling incessantly and at all seasons for grubs; he
+is a typical woodpecker of the largest size, but his hind toe and claw
+are, if anything, a trifle shorter than his middle toe with its claw. He
+throws it out and uses it as we have described, but it has not that
+disproportion to the other toes which we expected to find as the result
+of a strictly arboreal life.
+
+What have we proved? We have not shown that the long toe is _not_ more
+useful than the shorter one,--that is a matter of observation; but we
+have failed entirely to show that it is so, and this can be done only in
+one of two ways: either by proving that the logcock's habits are not
+what all previous observers have believed them to be,--which would be
+assuming a great burden of proof; or by demonstrating that his ancestry
+explains why his feet do not illustrate our theory,--and this, though it
+is undoubtedly the true solution, could be settled only by a very
+learned man.
+
+But we have encountered one truth which must always be held in mind in
+science--that a theory is not proved while a single fact remains
+rebellious and unsubdued. We might have examined every other woodpecker
+in the continent but just one; we might have seen that every other one
+agreed with our theory, as it does; we might have supposed that the
+explanation was good past doubting; but that one exception--if it was a
+logcock--would still over-turn the whole theory; and the very facts that
+we relied upon to strengthen us--its resemblance in size, habits, shape,
+and color to the ivory-billed woodpecker--have been the strongest
+possible means of totally demolishing our fine theory. We have learned,
+if nothing more, that all the facts must be examined and accounted for
+before an explanation is accepted as indisputable.
+
+
+
+
+XIII
+
+THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS TAIL
+
+
+If we study the woodpecker's anatomy and observe his broad, strong,
+highly-arched hip-bones and the heavy, triangular "ploughshare" bone in
+which the tail feathers are planted, as well as the stiffness and
+strength of the tail itself, we must conclude that it is not by accident
+that he uses his tail as a prop. The whole structure shows that the bird
+was intended "to lean on his tail." What we wish to discover is how good
+a tail it is to lean on.
+
+[Illustration: Tail of Hairy Woodpecker.]
+
+Our first impression is that the woodpecker's tail might be improved.
+Why are not the tips of the feathers stiffer? Why is it so rounded? Most
+of the work seems to fall on the middle feathers, and in some species,
+as the downy and the hairy woodpeckers, these end in decurved tips so
+soft and unresisting that they seem quite unfit to give any support.
+Would it not be better if the woodpecker's tail had been cut square
+across and made of feathers equally rigid and ending in short stiff
+spines? For we see that the woodpecker's tail is not only weak in its
+inner feathers, but weaker still in its outer ones, and it is stiff, in
+most species, only in the upper three fourths of its length.
+
+When we propose a change in nature it is wise to inquire whether our
+improvement has not been tried before and to learn how it worked. How
+many kinds of birds have we that use their tails for a support? What are
+their habits and what sort of tails have they?
+
+[Illustration: Tails of Brown Creeper (under surface) and Chimney Swift
+(upper surface.)]
+
+Besides the woodpeckers we have but two kinds of land birds that prop
+themselves with their tails,--the swifts and the creepers. The creeper
+has a tail very much like the woodpecker's as it is; while the chimney
+swift's is precisely like the woodpecker's as we thought it ought to be.
+But we observe that while the creeper's habits are almost precisely
+like the woodpecker's,--so much so that when we first make his
+acquaintance, some of us will be sure we have discovered a new kind of
+woodpecker,--the chimney swift has but one habit in common with the
+woodpecker, that of clinging to an upright surface and propping himself
+by his tail. If the bird with the tail most like the woodpecker's has
+the woodpecker's habits, is it not a fair inference that this form of
+tail is better fitted to this way of living than the other would be?
+
+Next, what variations in shapes do we observe among the woodpeckers
+themselves? The logcock and the ivory-billed woodpecker have the longest
+tails--because they are the largest birds. When we compare the length of
+the tails with the length of the birds we are surprised at the results.
+On measuring sixteen species, representing seven genera, I find that the
+tail is from three tenths to thirty-five hundredths of the entire
+length; that it is, in proportion, as long in the flicker as in the
+ivory-bill, as long in the downy as in the logcock, and longer (in the
+specimens measured) in the almost wholly terrestrial flicker than in the
+wholly arboreal logcock. Without much more study all that we can safely
+infer is that the woodpecker's tail is not far from one third the
+length of his whole body measured from the tip of the bill to the tip of
+the tail. Probably this is the proportion most convenient for his work.
+
+[Illustration: Middle tail feathers of Flicker, Ivory-billed Woodpecker,
+and Hairy Woodpecker.]
+
+All woodpeckers' tails agree in one particular: they are rounded at the
+end. At first sight we would say that some are but slightly rounded and
+others very deeply graduated; but as nearly as I can determine this is
+at least partly an optical illusion, explained by the great difference
+in the shape of the feathers making up the tail, which in some, as the
+flicker, are very broad and abruptly pointed, and in others taper
+gradually to the end and are very narrow for their length. The larger
+birds naturally appear to have longer tails, and the effect of narrow
+feathers is to make the tails appear longer and more sharply graduated
+than they really are. This diagram shows the shape of the curve in six
+species, and indicates that, while the curvature is less than we might
+expect, it bears some relation to the bird's way of living; for we see
+that the strictly arboreal woodpeckers have more pointed tails than the
+terrestrial species, and that the amount of gradation bears a direct
+relation to the amount of time spent upon the tree-trunks.
+
+There is a third difference, the shape of the individual feather, to
+which we shall refer again; but now we wish to examine the uses and
+meaning of the curved end.
+
+[Illustration]
+
+ Diagram of curvature of tails of Woodpeckers. Drawn to scale.
+
+ _a_, _a_, point of insertion in
+ rump.
+
+ _a_, _b_, outer tail feather.
+
+ _a_, _c_, middle tail feather.
+
+If the outer tail feather were of the same length in all cases, the
+curve at the end of the tail would be represented by the dotted lines.
+
+ 1. Flicker.
+
+ 2. Red-headed Woodpecker.
+
+ 3. Downy Woodpecker.
+
+ 4. Logcock.
+
+ 5. Central American Ivory-billed
+ Woodpecker.
+
+ 6. North American Ivory-billed
+ Woodpecker.
+
+
+I will show you how to prove this point so that you may be satisfied
+about it even if you should never see a woodpecker. We will make a
+little experiment, so simple that even a child can understand it.
+
+First, how many shapes can any bird's tail have? It may be one of three
+general patterns, and it can be nothing else unless we combine those
+patterns. It may be square across the end, it may have the middle
+feathers longest, or it may have the outer feathers longest. To one of
+these patterns every form of birds' tails may be referred; you can
+invent no other shape.
+
+Let us assume that you know nothing whatever of a woodpecker's tail
+except that it has ten feathers, is used as a prop, and is held at an
+angle of thirty or forty degrees with the tree-trunk. Now, take three
+strips of paper of the same width and length, and of any size not
+inconveniently small. Fold them all down the centre. Cut one square
+across; cut one with a rounded end and the third with a forked end,
+making them of any shape you please so long as the three papers are of
+the same length. To give our models a fair test they must be of the same
+width and length. Next, pin a sheet of paper of any size you please into
+the form of a cylinder and stand it on end to represent a tree-trunk.
+Then fit the patterns to the tree-trunk and see which is the form that
+would give the most support.
+
+[Illustration: Patterns of tails.]
+
+But first, in how many ways is it possible for a bird to use his tail as
+a prop? He may of course hold it open or closed; and the open tail may
+be held in a single plane, "spread flat," as we say; or curved up at the
+edges, like a crow blackbird's; or curved down at the edges. And the
+closed tail may be held in a single plane; or, by dropping each pair of
+feathers a little, in several planes. Thus we see there are five
+positions in which each shape may be held against the cylinder of paper.
+Try each one against it, holding it first in the open positions and then
+after folding the paper like a bird's tail with the outer feathers
+underneath, in the closed positions. The size of the model tree-trunk
+and the shape you cut your curves will make the results vary a little,
+but you will be surprised to observe, if your models are not too small,
+how many times you will get the same answers. Note the number and
+position of the pairs that touch:
+
+ _Spread._ _Square end._ _Forked end._ _Round end._
+
+ one plane, varies varies middle pair
+ curved up, middle pair middle pair middle pair
+ curved down, all all all
+ _Closed._
+ one plane, outer pair outer pair middle pair
+ different planes, outer pair outer pair all
+
+Which shape brings the most feathers into use in all positions? Which
+positions bring most feathers into use? We see at once that the rounded
+end has a decided advantage, that the middle pair of feathers is used in
+all possible positions, that the pair next outside is the next
+important, and that the spread tail curving downward at the edges and
+the closed tail in different planes are the two shapes which give the
+best support. There is therefore a reason for the rounded end which we
+said was the rule among the woodpeckers.
+
+Our little experiment is what we call a _deduction_. It shows us what we
+ought to expect under certain imaginary conditions. But it does not show
+us what actually exists, so there often comes a time when our deductions
+are faulty because Nature has done some unexpected thing, as when we
+found the single exception of the logcock's foot upsetting a fine theory
+of ours. A deduction must always be compared with facts, and is worth
+little or nothing if a single fact of the series we are studying is not
+explained by it. This time all the facts do agree; for I had, before we
+made our experiment, examined the tails of every species of woodpecker
+ever found in North America, and there was no exception to the rounded
+end. I had already drawn my conclusion that this form was better
+adapted to life on a tree-trunk than the square or the forked tail would
+be, reasoning by a different process called _induction_. An induction
+examines many, and, if possible, all the facts before drawing any
+conclusion; a deduction examines the facts after the conclusion is
+reached. There is no hard-and-fast line between the two kinds of
+reasoning, but we may say that a _deduction is reasoning out a guess and
+an induction is guessing out a reason_. Deductions are easier and
+quicker; inductions are surer, and in preparing them we often make other
+discoveries.
+
+The rounded tail is no doubt the best; but we have yet to decide whether
+the sharper curve is more advantageous than the lesser curve, as we
+thought probable from our observations. And there is still another
+deduction from our experiment which we did not make. If in the rounded
+tail the middle pairs of feathers do most of the work, and if use
+increases the size and efficiency of a part, which is almost an axiom in
+science, we should expect to find the middle tail feathers not only
+strongest in all woodpeckers but also strongest in increasing ratio in
+the species that use them most. To determine this we must study the use
+of the tail and the structure and shape of the individual tail
+feathers.
+
+We should remark, perhaps, that the woodpecker's tail is always composed
+of twelve feathers--ten pointed rectrices and two tiny abortive feathers
+so short and so hidden that no attention is paid to them. The ten
+principal feathers are arranged in corresponding pairs numbered from the
+outside to the centre as first, second, third, fourth, and fifth pairs.
+
+In the flickers all ten feathers have wide vanes and are similar in
+everything but the shape; all are more or less pointed. The flicker's
+tail looks and feels very much like that of any other bird except that
+the shafts are stiffer and the vanes contract to an acuminate tip. But
+as we take up the other species we notice a change, not only in the
+shape of the feathers but much more in their texture and in the
+difference between the various pairs. While in the flicker four pairs
+out of five are pointed and all are rigid, in the downy and the hairy
+three pairs out of five seem to be too soft to give any support, the
+sharp points have disappeared, and the tail has lost much of its
+stiffness. The two middle pairs of feathers are the only ones capable of
+doing much work and they are wavering and infirm at the tips where we
+should expect them to be strongest. In the logcock it is about the
+same,--two pairs are apparently unfit for work, one pair is infirm, and
+the two middle pairs are compelled to give all the support, except the
+little contributed by the third pair. In the ivory-billed woodpecker the
+two outer pairs are of no assistance and the three central ones do the
+work, and here again we find the base of the rectrices rigid and
+inflexible and the last fourth of their length weak and yielding. But
+what a difference in the individual feather! It is well able to do all
+the work; for, except for that weak tip which we cannot now explain, it
+is one of the toughest and strongest feathers to be found. The shaft is
+broad and flat, as elastic as a watch-spring; it looks like a band of
+burnished steel as it runs down between the vanes. And the vanes
+themselves are of a very curious pattern. They curl under at the edges
+so that we do not see their whole width, and the barbs crowd so thickly
+upon each other that they over-lie until they present an edge three or
+four broad. Indeed, the under side of one of these tail feathers reminds
+one of nothing so much as of the under side of a star-fish's arm with
+its two long lines of ambulacral suckers on each side of a central
+groove, so thickly do the spiny vanes of these strong rectrices over
+ride and crowd together. These spines lay hold of the bark of the tree,
+rank after rank, hundreds of bristling points that cannot be dislodged
+except by a forward motion of the bird or by lifting the tail. Compared
+with this, the spiny points on the flicker's tail were a poor invention.
+This device, which takes hold like a wool card, or a wire hair-brush,
+cannot slip from place. We begin to see, too, the use of that weak and
+flexible tip; it is to press down upon the tree-trunk a flat surface
+sufficiently large to hold hundreds of these little spiny points against
+the bark. The ivory-bill braces against this with the stiff upper part
+of the shaft and has a support that will not slip. The upper part of the
+shaft acts like a spring also, and adds tremendous force to the blow of
+the bill. Watch a hairy woodpecker when hard at work and see how his
+legs and tail form a triangular base by bracing against each other, and
+how his blow is delivered, not with the head alone, but with the whole
+body, swinging from the hips, the apex of the triangle on which he
+rests. He swings like a man wielding a sledge hammer, and to the
+strength of his neck adds the weight of his body, the spring of his
+tail, and the momentum of a blow delivered from a greater height. When
+the little hairy woodpecker does so much with his weak body, we can
+imagine what great birds like the logcock and the ivory-billed
+woodpecker, with their tremendous beaks, their huge claws, their springy
+tails, and their great physical strength can do. They are magnificent
+birds, the terror of all the grubs that hide in tree-trunks.
+
+[Illustration: Under side of middle tail feather of Ivory-billed
+Woodpecker.]
+
+One point we have left unexplained: What is the advantage, if there is
+any, in the sharper curve to the tails of the arboreal woodpeckers? It
+is a simple question. The curve is caused by the unequal length of the
+tail feathers; each tail feather is a prop, and by their inequality they
+become props of different lengths. Now ask any carpenter which will best
+support a tottering wall--props all of the same length set at the same
+angle, or props of different lengths set at different angles? His answer
+will help you to solve the problem. But if a little is good, why are not
+all the pairs used as props? Partly, perhaps, because the woodpecker is
+always crowded for houseroom, and while he must have tail enough, he
+cannot afford to have any which he does not use. Did you ever think what
+an inconvenience any tail at all must be in a woodpecker's hole?
+
+
+
+
+XIV
+
+THE WOODPECKER'S TOOLS: HIS TONGUE
+
+
+We have seen how the woodpecker spears his grubs: now we will study his
+spear.
+
+[Illustration: Tongue of Hairy Woodpecker. (After Lucas.)]
+
+There are many interesting points about a woodpecker's tongue, and they
+are not hard to understand. If a woodpecker would kindly let us take
+hold of his tongue and pull it out to its full extent we should be
+afraid we were "spoiling his machinery," for the tongue can be drawn out
+almost incredibly--between two and three inches in a hairy woodpecker
+and more in a flicker. A strange-looking object it is, much resembling
+an angle-worm in form, color, and feeling; for it is round, soft, and
+sticky, except at the flat, horny, bayonet-pointed tip, and as it lies
+in the mouth it is wrinkled like the wrist of a loose glove; but it
+grows smaller and smoother the more we pull it out. Evidently we are
+only drawing it into its skin. But where does so much tongue come from?
+Does it stretch like a piece of elastic cord? Or is a part hidden
+somewhere? And if so, where is it kept?
+
+[Illustration: Tongue-bones of Flicker. (After Lucas.)]
+
+ _a._ Cerato-hyals, fused and short.
+ _b._ Basi-hyal, long, slender.
+ _c._ Cerato-branchials.
+ _d._ Epibranchials.
+ Basi-branchial is wanting.
+
+
+These questions are answered by studying the bones of the tongue, for
+without bones it could not be guided as swiftly and surely as it is.
+Indeed, all tongues have bones in them, as you will discover by cutting
+carefully the slices near the root of an ox-tongue; but no other
+creature has such long and elaborate tongue-bones as some of the
+woodpeckers. They are the slenderest and most delicate little bony rods,
+joined end to end, but not really hinged nor needing to be, because they
+are so elastic. Here are the bones of a flicker's tongue. The little
+knob at the end, marked _a_, bore the horny point of the tongue and
+directed it; the straight shaft marked _b_ was inside the round part of
+the tongue as it lay within the bird's mouth; but what was done with
+these two long branches, fully three quarters of the entire length of
+the bones? They are too sharply curved to pass down the bird's throat,
+and, not being jointed, they cannot be doubled back in his mouth. They
+were tucked away very neatly and curiously. As the hyoid or tongue-bone
+lies in the mouth its branches diverge just in front of the gullet, and,
+traveling along the inner sides of the fork of the lower jaw, pass up
+over the top of the skull, looking in their sheath of muscles like two
+tiny whipcords. But still the bones are too long by perhaps half an inch
+for the place they occupy, and the ends must be neatly disposed of.
+Usually both pass to the right nasal opening and along the hollow of the
+upper mandible. Very rarely they may curl down around the eyeball in a
+spiral spring. So when the flicker thrusts out his tongue he feels the
+pull in the end of his nose, for the tip of the tongue being run out,
+the long slender bones are drawn out of their hiding-places, down over
+the skull until they lie flat along the roof of his mouth. As soon as
+he wishes to shut his bill, back fly the little bones guided by their
+hollow sheaths of elastic muscle into their hiding-place in the top of
+the bill. The muscular covering is a part of the same soft envelope that
+we saw lying in wrinkles at the root of the tongue. It covers the whole
+length of the little bones just as the woven outside covers an elastic
+cord.
+
+[Illustration: Skull of Woodpecker, showing bones of tongue. _a._ Upper
+end of windpipe and gullet.]
+
+[Illustration: Hyoids of Sapsucker and Golden-fronted Woodpecker.]
+
+Not all woodpeckers have tongues precisely like this. The sapsucker's is
+the shortest of any, and reaches barely beyond the hinge of the jaws. In
+the Lewis's woodpecker and others of his genus the branches of the hyoid
+extend part-way up the back of the skull but in the kinds that live
+principally upon borers they are very long and resemble the flicker's in
+arrangement. The only other North American birds that have a tongue
+built upon this plan are the hummingbirds, in which also it is
+extensile. The flicker, in proportion to his size, has the longest
+tongue of any bird known.
+
+
+
+
+XV
+
+HOW EACH WOODPECKER IS FITTED FOR HIS OWN KIND OF LIFE
+
+
+We have studied the woodpeckers at some length: first, what all of them
+do; next, what some that are peculiar in their ways do; lastly, how each
+is fitted for a particular kind of life. At first we were inclined to
+think they were all alike; but now we begin to see that there are very
+real differences between them,--in tails, feet, bills, and tongues, and
+at the same time in their food and habits.
+
+The flicker's tail is less sharply curved than that of any other
+woodpecker,--a sign that he is probably not exclusively a tree-dweller;
+his bill is curved and rounded, a pick-axe rather than a drill,--an
+indication that he does not dig for grubs; his feet do not tell us much;
+but his long extensile tongue shows that, whatever he feeds upon, he
+seeks it in holes. We find a tongue like this in no other bird, but
+among mammals the aard-vark, the ant-bear, and the pangolins are all
+similarly equipped, and all live on ants which they extract from their
+mounds and burrows in hundreds by means of these round, sticky, and
+extensile tongues. This is precisely the way the flicker gets his
+living. He lives principally upon the ground or near it, pecks very
+little except when digging his nest, and feeds largely upon ants,
+thrusting his head into the ant-hills and drawing out the ants glued to
+his tongue rather than speared by it. As he has been known to eat three
+thousand ants for a meal, we see how much easier this is than spearing
+them one by one.
+
+The red-head is another type. The bill is still nearly of the pick-axe
+model, the feet not especially different from the flicker's, the tail
+rather better adapted to life on a tree-trunk, and the tongue entirely
+unlike the flicker's,--not very extensile and heavily clothed near the
+tip with long, thick, recurved bristles. We infer that though he may
+climb well, he is not a drilling woodpecker to any great extent, and
+that his tongue is adapted neither to extracting borers nor to eating
+ants from their burrows. His habits bear out the inference. He is
+arboreal, but his food is either vegetable or picked up from the
+surface, rasped up rather than speared.
+
+The sapsucker presents still another variation. The points to the tail
+feathers are more acuminate and the tail itself more resembles that of
+the tree-dwelling woodpeckers in shape; the feet are fitted for clinging
+to the trunk; the bill, now perfectly straight and no longer smoothly
+rounded but buttressed by strong angles that spring from the base and
+run down toward the tip, is the bill of a woodpecker that lives by
+drilling; but the tongue is wholly unadapted to catching grubs. What
+kind of food can an arboreal woodpecker with a drilling bill find upon a
+tree-trunk when his tongue can be extended only a fifth of an inch, and
+is furnished with a brush of bristles at the end? We have answered that
+question before: he eats the inner bark of trees and laps up the sap,
+for which this brushy tip is excellently fitted. It has been observed
+that the tongue much resembles the tongues of insect-eating birds, which
+cannot be extended beyond the end of the bill. It is true that the
+sapsucker catches great numbers of insects, taking them on the wing like
+a flycatcher. But he also eats nearly as many ants as the flicker,
+though their tongues are totally unlike. We have made the mistake
+perhaps of thinking that ants live only underground and can be obtained
+only by tongues like those of the flicker and the ant-bear, which hunt
+them there. But ants are abundant on the surface of the ground, and
+they excavate long tunnels in rotten wood. The black bear is a famous
+ant-hunter, yet his tongue is like a dog's and he gets his ants by
+lapping them up after he has torn open the rotten logs in which they
+live. This is the way that the sapsucker obtains his ants, and the brush
+of stiff hairs is a help to him in such work. We see, then, that it is
+not so much the food as the manner of feeding that explains the form of
+the tongue.
+
+The downy and the hairy are a step farther along in their development.
+The fourth toe is longer than the others, a condition that we do not
+find in any of the woodpeckers not strictly arboreal; the tail is of the
+improved pattern, holding by a brush of bristles rather than by one
+stiff point at the end of each feather; the bill is heavier, broader at
+the base, more heavily ridged, and in every way a stronger tool; and the
+tongue is highly extensible and of the spear pattern, sharp-pointed and
+barbed with recurved hooks. Everything about these birds indicates that
+they are fitted to live on tree-trunks and to dig for borers. This,
+indeed, is what they do.
+
+But the great logcock and the ivory-billed woodpecker, though of the
+same type as the other larvae-eating woodpeckers, are more highly
+developed along the same line. We notice the great strength of the
+feet; the claws, as large and as sharp as a cat's; the enormous weight
+and strength of the bill, compared with that of the other woodpeckers,
+which enables them to cut into the hardest wood and even into frozen
+green timber; and the great development of the tail, which now becomes a
+strong spring to support and aid the bird in his work.
+
+As we try to group these particulars under general heads, we see that we
+have observed three things:--
+
+_That the structure of a bird is adapted to its kind of life._
+
+_That the structure varies by small degrees with the kind of life._
+
+_That the kind of life is conditioned largely upon the kind of food and
+upon the method of procuring it, more particularly the latter._
+
+These are not so much different truths as three aspects of one truth.
+When we study the first we see why birds are grouped together into
+orders and families: we study their resemblances. When we observe the
+second we see why they are divided into species, for we note their
+differences. But when we consider the third and reflect that birds have
+the power to choose new kinds of food or new places and means of getting
+it, we see how it is that there can come to be new kinds of birds, new
+subspecies and species, springing up from time to time. Wonderful and
+improbable as it seems, there is more reason to believe than there is to
+doubt that new kinds of animals and plants are constantly in process of
+making; that the laws of change are constantly at work, adapting
+creatures to their surroundings or crushing them out of existence
+because they will not learn new ways. And it is probable that these
+differences which we mark in the woodpeckers have been the result of
+efforts to adapt themselves to a peculiar kind of life where food was
+abundant; and also that by acquired habits and by acquired tastes for
+different kinds of foods they will be subject to still further
+variations in the future.
+
+
+
+
+XVI
+
+THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN
+
+
+But if the birds are making themselves into new species, where is the
+place for God in the universe? Did not God make all kinds of creatures
+in the beginning? How can they go on being made without God?
+
+These are questions every one ought to ask, but--did God leave his world
+after He had made it and go a long way off? Did He wind it up like a
+watch to go till it should run down? Is the world a machine, or is it
+alive?
+
+Long ago the wise and good man Socrates argued that if you did not know
+there was a God at all, you could at least infer it because everything
+was so wonderfully made. "There is our body," said he: "every part of it
+so perfect and so reasonable. Consider how the eyes not only please us
+with agreeable sensations but are protected in every way. The eyebrows
+stand like a thicket to keep the perspiration from them, the lids are a
+curtain to shut out too great light, the lashes screen them from
+dust,--everything is planned for some wise and reasonable end. And
+where the evidence of design is so convincing must we not believe that
+there was a Designer?" Words like these he spoke, and we know because
+everything is so perfectly contrived that there must have been a
+contriver, who knew all from the beginning. We are compelled to believe
+that there is a God.
+
+Shall we believe it less because we find in the creatures about us
+intelligence and the power to care for their own lives? Has God gone on
+a visit because these living creatures are looking out for themselves?
+Were they made less perfectly in the beginning because when new
+conditions surround them they are able to change to meet the strange
+requirements? This is not less evidence of a Designer, but more. It was
+long said that the existence of a watch was proof of a watchmaker who
+had planned and put together all the parts so that they worked
+harmoniously. But if the watch had the power to grow small to fit a
+small pocket, or large to fit a large one, to become luminous by night,
+and to correct its own time by the sun instead of being regulated by
+outside interference, what should we have said--that it was proof there
+was no watchmaker? or that it showed a far more skillful one, since he
+could make a living, self-regulating, adaptive watch?
+
+And so of the world and the creatures in it. Every evidence we get that
+they can care for themselves, that they can adapt themselves to new
+conditions, that they are intelligent and reasonable, capable of
+improvement in habits or in structure, is so much surer proof that a
+wise God made them what they are. Evolution--for that is the name by
+which we call these changes--does not take God out of the universe but
+makes the need of Him stronger. The argument from design is immensely
+strengthened when we consider that we have not only an obedient machine
+acting according to a few fundamental rules, but one that is intelligent
+also and capable of self-modification.
+
+
+
+
+APPENDIX
+
+_Explanation of Terms._
+
+
+[Illustration: Head of a Flicker.]
+
+ _a._ Forehead; _b._ crown; _c._ occiput; _d._ nape; _e._ chin; _f._
+ throat; _g._ jaw-patch, or mustache.
+
+ _Occipital_ means "on the occiput."
+
+ _Nuchal_ means "on the nape."
+
+ _Primaries_ are the nine or ten wing-quills borne upon the last
+ joint of the wing.
+
+ _Secondaries_ are the wing-quills attached to the fore-arm bones.
+
+ _Tertiaries_ are the wing-quills springing from the upper arm
+ bones.
+
+ _Wing coverts_ are the shorter lines of feathers overlapping these
+ long quills.
+
+ _Tail coverts_ are the lengthened feathers that overlap the root of
+ the tail both above and below, called respectively upper and under
+ tail coverts.
+
+ _Ear coverts_ are the feathers that over-lie the ear, often
+ specially modified or colored.
+
+ _Rump_, the space between the middle of the back and the root of
+ the tail.
+
+ [M] is the sign used to indicate the male sex.
+
+ [F] is the sign used to indicate the female sex.
+
+ A _subspecies_ is a geographical race, modified in size, color, or
+ proportions chiefly by the influence of climate. These variations
+ are especially marked in non-migratory birds of wide distribution,
+ subject, therefore, to climatic extremes. The Downy and the Hairy
+ Woodpeckers, for example, are split up into numerous races. It
+ should be remembered that when a species has been separated into
+ races, or subspecies, all the subspecies are of equal rank, even
+ though they are differently designated. The one originally
+ discovered and first described bears the old Latin name which
+ consisted of two words, while the new ones are designated by triple
+ Latin names--the old binomial and a new name in addition. The
+ binomial indicates the form first described. The forms designated
+ by trinomials may be equally well known, abundant, and widely
+ distributed. For example, among the woodpeckers, the northern form
+ of the Hairy Woodpecker was first discovered and bears the name
+ _Dryobates villosus_; but the first Downy Woodpecker described was
+ a southern bird, and the northern form was not separated until a
+ few years ago, so that the southern bird is the type, and the
+ northern one bears the trinomial, _Dryobates pubescens medianus_.
+
+ _North America_, by the decision of the American Ornithologists'
+ Union, is held to include the continent north of the present
+ boundary between Mexico and the United States, with Greenland, the
+ peninsula of Lower California, and the islands adjacent naturally
+ belonging to the same.
+
+ The following key and descriptions will enable the student to
+ identify any woodpecker known to occur within these limits:
+
+A. KEY TO THE WOODPECKERS OF NORTH AMERICA.
+
+Family characteristics: color always striking, usually in spots, bars,
+or patches of contrasting colors, especially black and white. Sexes
+usually unlike; male always with some portion of red or yellow about
+head, throat, or neck. Tails stiff, rounded, composed of ten fully
+developed pointed feathers (and two undeveloped feathers). Wings large,
+rounded, with long, conspicuous secondaries, and short coverts. Bill
+straight, stout, of medium length. Toes four, arranged in pairs, except
+in the three-toed genus. Iris brown, except when noted. Marked by a
+habit of clinging to upright surfaces and digging a deep hole in a
+tree-trunk for nesting. Eggs always pearly white.
+
+I. Very large--18 inches _or more_; conspicuously crested. A. II. Medium
+or small--14 inches _or less_; never crested. B.
+
+ A. a^1 Bill gleaming _ivory white_; fourth toe decidedly longest.
+ Ivory-billed Woodpecker. 1.
+
+ a^2 Bill _blackish_; fourth toe not decidedly longest.
+ Pileated Woodpecker or Logcock. 14.
+
+ B. a^1 Toes three; [M] with _yellow_ crown.
+ Three-toed Woodpeckers. 9 & 10.
+
+ a^2 Toes four; crown never yellow (b).
+
+ b^1 _Not spotted nor streaked either above or below_ (c).
+
+ c^1 Body clear black; _head white_.
+ White-headed Woodpecker. 8.
+
+ c^2 Blue-black above; _rump white_; _head_ and _neck red_.
+ Red-headed Woodpecker. 15.
+
+ c^3 Greenish black above, with _pinkish red belly_.
+ Lewis's Woodpecker. 17.
+
+ c^4 Greenish black with _sulphur yellow forehead_ and
+ _throat._
+ Californian Woodpecker. 16.
+
+ c^5 Glossy blue-black with _scarlet throat_ and _yellow
+ belly_.
+ Male of Williamson's Sapsucker. 13.
+
+ b^2 _Spotted with black or brown on breast and sides_,
+ but not streaked nor barred with white (d).
+
+ d^1 _Brown_ spots on breast and sides; upper parts plain
+ brown.
+ Arizona Woodpecker. 7.
+
+ d^2 _Black_ spots on breast and sides; wings and tail
+ brilliantly colored beneath (e).
+
+ e^1 Wings and tail _golden_ beneath; mustaches
+ _black_ in male, wanting in female.
+ Flicker. 21.
+
+ e^2 Wings and tail _golden_ beneath; mustaches
+ _red_ in both sexes.
+ Gilded Flicker. 23.
+
+ e^3 Wings and tail _golden red_ beneath; mustaches red.
+ Red-shafted Flicker. 22.
+
+ e^4 Wings and tail _golden red_ beneath; mustaches red;
+ crown brown.
+ Guadalupe Flicker. 24.
+
+ b^3 _Streaked, spotted, or barred with white on back and wings_ (f).
+
+ f^1 _Back streaked_, _plain_, or _varied_, _never_ barred
+ with white; wings _spotted_ with white (g).
+
+ g^1 _Clear_ white and black; _white streak down the
+ back_ (h).
+
+ h^1 Medium size, 9-11 inches.
+ Hairy Woodpecker. 2.
+
+ h^2 Small size, 6-7 inches.
+ Downy Woodpecker. 3.
+
+ g^2 _Grayish_ white and black; _sides closely barred_ (i).
+
+ i^1 Back plain black, white _stripe_ down side of throat.
+ Female of Arctic Three-toed Woodpecker. 9.
+
+ i^2 Back with interrupted white stripe, white _line_
+ down side of throat.
+ Female of American Three-toed Woodpecker. 10.
+ (NOTE.--The males are similar with the addition
+ of the yellow crown. The three toes
+ cannot ordinarily be seen in life.)
+
+ g^3 _Yellowish_ (often dingy or smutty), white and black;
+ under parts yellowish; back varied with white, no
+ line nor streak; _rump white_; _white wing-bars_ (j).
+
+ j^1 Breast with black patch; head of adult with red
+ patches.
+ Yellow-bellied Sapsucker. 11.
+
+ j^2 Breast and head red.
+ Red-breasted Sapsucker. 12.
+
+ f^2 _Back barred with white_; wings spotted or barred with
+ white (k).
+
+ k^1 Belly _white; ear coverts white_.
+ Red-cockaded Woodpecker. 4.
+
+ k^2 Belly _white; forehead black_.
+ Nuttall's Woodpecker. 6.
+
+ k^3 Belly _smoky brown_; forehead and breast same.
+ Texan Woodpecker. 5.
+
+ k^4 Belly _sulphur or lemon yellow_.
+ Female of Williamson's Woodpecker. 13.
+
+ k^5 Belly _pinkish red_.
+ Red-bellied Woodpecker. 18.
+
+ k^6 Belly _yellow_, hind neck and forehead orange.
+ Golden-fronted Woodpecker. 19.
+
+ k^7 Belly _yellow_, hind neck brown.
+ Gila Woodpecker. 20.
+
+B. DESCRIPTIONS OF THE WOODPECKERS OF NORTH AMERICA.
+
+The following are descriptions of all the species of Woodpeckers found
+in North America, arranged in their proper genera and in the order given
+in the check list of the American Ornithologists' Union, 1895; with the
+range of species and subspecies as defined by the same authority or by
+Bendire's "Life Histories of North American Birds."
+
+ 1. CAMPEPHILUS PRINCIPALIS, _Ivory-billed Woodpecker_.
+ Glossy black except _white secondaries_ (very conspicuous) and
+ white stripe from beneath ear down neck and shoulders; white
+ nasal tufts; _bill white_. Both sexes crested; [M]
+ with scarlet occipital crest, [F] with crest
+ black. Iris yellow. 20 inches.
+ Cypress swamps of Gulf States, locally distributed.
+ The largest, shyest, and rarest of our woodpeckers.
+
+ 2. DRYOBATES VILLOSUS, _Hairy Woodpecker_.
+ Black and white. Upper parts glossy black with a broad _white
+ stripe_ down the back; wings thickly spotted with white; under
+ parts white; three outer pairs of tail feathers white; two white
+ and two black stripes on sides of head; nasal tufts brownish
+ white. [M] with scarlet occipital patch. 9-10
+ inches.
+ Eastern United States except South Atlantic and Gulf
+ States, with the following subspecies, all the races being
+ resident the year round, and breeding in most places
+ where they are found:--
+
+ a. _D. v. leucomelas_, _Northern Hairy Woodpecker_. 10-11 inches.
+ Larger, whiter.
+ British America.
+
+ b. _D. v. audubonii_, _Southern Hairy Woodpecker_. 8-8.5 inches.
+ Smaller, more dingy white.
+ South Atlantic and Gulf States.
+
+ c. _D. v. harrisii_, _Harris's Woodpecker_. 9-10 inches.
+ Upper parts with less white, few wing spots, under parts
+ soiled white or smoky brown; larger than next.
+ Northwest coast, northern California to Alaska.
+
+ d. _D. v. hyloscopus_, _Cabanis's Woodpecker_. 8.5-9.5 inches.
+ White stripe down back very wide; purer white below than
+ _harrisii_; fewer wing spots than _leucomelas_ and _villosus_.
+ Western United States, except northwest coast, east to
+ the Rocky Mountains.
+
+ e. _D. v. monticola_, _Rocky Mountain Woodpecker_. 10-11 inches.
+ Larger; more white spots near bend of wing and secondaries
+ than _hyloscopus_, fewer than _villosus_; pure white below.
+ Rocky Mountains west to Uintah Mountains, Utah.
+
+ 3. DRYOBATES PUBESCENS, _Southern Downy Woodpecker_.
+ Black and white; broad _white stripe_ down back; wings thickly
+ spotted with white; under parts white. [M] with
+ scarlet occipital patch. A miniature Hairy Woodpecker, differing
+ only in having _four_ outer pairs of tail feathers more or less
+ white and the _outermost barred_. 6.5 inches. Like the Hairy
+ Woodpecker, the Downy and its subspecies are resident and breed
+ wherever they occur.
+ South Atlantic and Gulf States.
+
+ a. _D. p. gairdnerii_, _Gairdner's Woodpecker_. 6.75 inches.
+ Bears same relation to Downy that Harris's does to Hairy
+ Woodpecker; under parts smoky white; wings spots few.
+ Pacific coast north to about lat. 55 deg.
+
+ b. _D. p. oreoecus_, _Batchelder's Woodpecker_. 7.5 inches.
+ Under parts pure white; under tail coverts unspotted;
+ fewer wing spots than _medianus_ and _pubescens_.
+ Rocky Mountain region of United States.
+
+ c. _D. p. medianus_, _Downy Woodpecker_. 7 inches.
+ The larger, whiter form seen in New England and the
+ Northern States.
+
+ d. _D. p. nelsoni_, _Nelson's Downy Woodpecker_.
+ Whiter, larger, with fewer black bars on outer tail
+ feathers.
+ Alaska and region north of 55 deg.
+
+ 4. DRYOBATES BOREALIS, _Red-cockaded Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts black _barred_ with white, under parts dingy white;
+ sides streaked and spotted with black; wings spotted with white;
+ outer tail feathers barred; nasal tufts and _large ear patch
+ white_; stripe of black down side of neck. [M] with
+ a tiny tuft of scarlet feathers on each side of head. 7.5-8.5
+ inches.
+ Pine woods of southeastern United States, from Tennessee
+ southwest to eastern Texas and the Indian Territory;
+ casual north to Pennsylvania.
+
+ 5. DRYOBATES SCALARIS BAIRDI, _Texan Woodpecker_, _Ladder-backed
+ Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts barred with black and white on back, wings,
+ and outer tail feathers; sides of head striped; forehead,
+ nasal feathers, and under parts _smoky gray_, brownest on
+ belly; _crown speckled with white or red_; [M]
+ with nape crimson. 7-7.5 inches.
+ Southern border of United States, Texas to California,
+ north to southwestern Utah and southern Nevada; generally
+ resident.
+
+ a. _D. s. lucasanus_, _St. Lucas Woodpecker_. Larger.
+ Lower California, north to 34 deg. in Colorado desert.
+ These are both subspecies of a Mexican species not occurring
+ within our limits.
+
+ 6. DRYOBATES NUTTALLII, _Nuttall's Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts barred with black and white; under parts and
+ _outer tail feathers white_ or dingy white; nasal tufts white;
+ _forehead and crown black sprinkled with white_. [M]
+ with red on occiput and nape. 7-7.5 inches.
+ Southern Oregon and California west of Sierra Nevada
+ and Cascade Ranges; most common in the oak belt of
+ the foothills.
+ Easily distinguished from Downy Woodpecker by being
+ barred on the back, instead of striped.
+
+ 7. DRYOBATES ARIZONAE, _Arizona Woodpecker_.
+ _Upper parts plain brown, not spotted nor streaked_; primaries
+ dotted with fine white dots; outer tail feathers barred;
+ under parts white, _thickly spotted_ (except throat), _with large,
+ round, brown spots_. [M] with red occipital band.
+ 7.5-8.5 inches.
+ Southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico; among
+ oaks of the foothills from 4000 to 7000 feet elevation.
+
+ 8. XENOPICUS ALBOLARVATUS, _White-headed Woodpecker_.
+ Glossy black all over, except showy white patch on primaries,
+ and _head and throat pure white_ (forehead and crown
+ sometimes grayish). [M] with broad occipital band of
+ scarlet. 9 inches. "Iris pinkish red" (Bendire).
+ Mountains of Pacific coast, east to western Nevada and
+ western Idaho, usually in the pine and fir forests above
+ 4000 feet altitude.
+
+ 9. PICOIDES ARCTICUS, _Arctic Three-toed Woodpecker_.
+ _Glossy black above, unmarked_ except by fine white spots on
+ primaries; under parts grayish white, sides thickly barred
+ black and white; three outer pairs of tail feathers white,
+ sides of throat with broad _white stripe_. [M] with
+ _large crown patch of deep yellow_. 9.5 inches.
+ British America, south into the northern tier of States
+ and into the Sierra Nevada Mountains to Lake Tahoe.
+ Most commonly seen in the track of forest fires, where it
+ is usually abundant for about two years; rare outside of the
+ extensive soft wood tracts, and usually found singly or in
+ pairs except when on burnt land. I have found this species
+ far more common than the next, and the best mark in life
+ to be the white _stripe_ on the neck, in distinction from the
+ white _line_ of _P. americanus_.
+
+ 10. PICOIDES AMERICANUS, _American Three-toed Woodpecker_.
+ Very similar to preceding species, but with narrow bars of white
+ forming an _interrupted stripe down the back_; head thickly
+ sprinkled with white in both sexes and a white line on nape or
+ just below; a _white line_, too narrow to be called a stripe,
+ down side of throat.[M] with _crown bright yellow_.
+ 9 inches. Same range in the East as last; replaced in West by
+ following subspecies:--
+
+ a. _P. a. alascensis_, _Alaskan Three-toed Woodpecker_.
+ Smaller; more white; nape very white; more white on top
+ of head.
+ Alaska, south to 48 deg. (Mt. Baker, Washington).
+
+ b. _P. a. dorsalis_, _Alpine Three-toed Woodpecker_.
+ More white on back and head than _P. americanus_, less than
+ _alascensis_; but continuous, not barred. "Iris dark cherry-red"
+ (Mearns).
+ Rocky Mountain region, south to New Mexico and Arizona.
+
+ 11. SPHYRAPICUS VARIUS, _Yellow-bellied Sapsucker_.
+ Under parts whitish or pale sulphur yellow; upper parts black,
+ mottled with pure or yellowish white; _rump white_; wings
+ spotted, and with conspicuous white coverts; tail black with
+ _outer webs of outer feathers_ and _inner webs of middle
+ feathers light colored_; sides streaked; breast with a _broad
+ black patch_ extending in a "chin-strap" to the corners of the
+ mouth; sides of the head striped. Occiput black, nape white.
+ [M] with forehead, crown, chin, and throat crimson;
+ [F] usually with crown crimson, forehead black,
+ and throat white, back more brownish; [F]
+ sometimes, and young always, with crown blackish. 7.5-8.5
+ inches.
+
+ Colors vary much with age, sex, and season; the wing bar
+ and yellowish tinge are good marks for all plumages; the
+ rump and breast patch for adult birds.
+ Eastern North America, breeding from Massachusetts
+ northward, migrating in winter to the Southern States.
+
+ a. _S. v. nuchalis_, _Red-naped Sapsucker_.
+ Similar, but an additional red stripe on nape, and the black
+ chin-strap replaced by crimson. 8-8.5 inches.
+ Rocky Mountains to Coast Range, replacing the above in
+ the mountains; usually breeding at from 5000 to 10,000
+ feet elevation.
+
+ 12. SPHYRAPICUS RUBER, _Red-breasted Sapsucker_.
+ Body and under parts similar to _S. varius_, but back much
+ less variegated with white. No black on breast, no white
+ stripe through eyes. Nasal tufts brownish instead of white.
+ _Head_, _neck_, and _breast uniform crimson_. _Sexes alike._ Young
+ with crimson replaced by gray or "claret brown" (Bendire).
+ 8.5-9 inches.
+ Pacific coast, Sierra Nevada, and on both sides of Cascade
+ Mountains; a summer resident only north of northern
+ California.
+ At first sight the Red-breasted Sapsucker might be mistaken
+ for the Red-headed Woodpecker, but the two birds
+ do not inhabit the same country.
+
+ 13. SPHYRAPICUS THYROIDEUS, _Williamson's Sapsucker_.
+
+ Sexes totally dissimilar except in having a white rump and
+ yellow under parts. _Male, glossy black all over except_
+ conspicuous _white rump_ and _white wing coverts_, two white
+ stripes on sides of head, white nasal tufts, white spots on
+ primaries; sides and tail coverts mottled; a stripe of scarlet
+ down middle of throat and _brilliant yellow under parts_.
+ _Female, light brown_; head clear brown; body, wings, and tail
+ closely _barred_ with black and white; no white wing coverts;
+ rarely a red throat like male; usually but not always a large
+ black patch on breast, and always a _yellow belly_ and _white
+ rump_. Young males lack the red on the throat and usually the
+ yellow on the belly; the black is dull, and the throat a dingy
+ white. Young females lack the yellow on the belly and the black
+ on breast, and are dull-colored and indistinctly marked. 9-9.5
+ inches.
+
+ Rocky Mountain region, west to Sierra Nevada, Cascades
+ and northern Coast Ranges, breeding at from 5000
+ to 9000 feet elevation. The handsomest of our woodpeckers.
+
+ 14. CEOPHLOEUS PILEATUS, _Pileated Woodpecker, Logcock_.
+ Body blackish slate; wings with a large white patch conspicuous
+ only when flying; throat white; a white stripe
+ across cheek and down neck; jaw-stripe scarlet in male,
+ blackish in female; both sexes with scarlet crest, but in the
+ male the whole top of head (which is slaty black in female)
+ equally brilliant. This red cap gives the bird the name of
+ _pileated_. Iris yellow. 17 inches.
+ Wooded regions of Southern States, Florida to North
+ Carolina, very rarely near settlements, but far more common
+ than the following subspecies of the North and
+ West.
+
+ a. _C. p. abieticola_, _Northern Pileated Woodpecker_.
+ Larger; more extensive white markings; the black grayer
+ or browner.
+ From Virginia northward to 63 deg. in the East, and in the
+ West among the Rocky Mountains, north of Colorado, to
+ the northwest coast; a shy woodland bird to be looked
+ for only in the primitive evergreen forests, though sometimes
+ occurring in any heavy timber and, in New England,
+ upon the higher well-wooded mountains. The
+ largest of the northern woodpeckers; resident.
+
+ 15. _Melanerpes erythrocephalus_, _Red-headed Woodpecker_.
+ Wings, tail, and upper parts glossy blue-black; rump, exposed
+ secondaries, and under parts from breast downward
+ pure white; _head_, _neck_, and _breast crimson._ _Sexes alike._
+ Young with red and black wholly or partly replaced by
+ grayish brown; can be recognized by white markings. 9.5
+ inches.
+ United States, west to Rocky Mountains; rare east of
+ Hudson River, but ordinarily breeding wherever found;
+ in winter usually migratory from its northern limits, the
+ migration depending principally upon the food supply
+ and depth of snow.
+
+ 16. MELANERPES FORMICIVORUS, _Ant-eating Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts, wings, and tail glossy greenish black; _rump_
+ and lower parts _white_; white patch on primaries, conspicuous
+ in flight; upper throat and line about the bill dull
+ black; _forehead_ with _wide white band_; lower _throat sulphur
+ yellow_; breast and sides thickly streaked with black and
+ white. [M] with crown and occiput crimson;
+ [F] with crown black, occiput crimson.
+ Iris white. 7-9 inches.
+ Mexico; western Texas.
+
+ a. _M. f. angustifrons_, _Narrow-fronted Woodpecker_.
+ Similar, but with a _narrow band of white_ across the _forehead_;
+ breast and sides not so thickly streaked.
+ Lower California, never occurring within the borders of
+ the United States.
+
+ b. _M. f. bairdi_, _Californian Woodpecker_, _El Carpintero_.
+ Similar to _M. formicivorus_, but the breast black, little
+ streaked with white except along the sides; yellow of throat
+ paler, or replaced by white. Iris white. Larger, 7.5-9.5
+ inches.
+ Pacific coast, north into Oregon to 44 deg., east to southern
+ New Mexico and Texas in the south and to the eastern
+ slopes of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Mountains in
+ the north, but more abundant, on the western than on the
+ eastern slopes of these mountains.
+
+ 17. MELANERPES TORQUATUS, _Lewis's Woodpecker_.
+ Upper parts, wings, and tail glossy greenish black; under
+ parts _pinkish red_; chest and _collar round hind neck hoary
+ gray_; crown and sides of head black; forehead, cheeks, and
+ chin crimson. _Sexes alike._ Young with pink replaced by
+ grayish. 10.5-11.5 inches.
+ Pacific coast, east to Black Hills and Rocky Mountains
+ between Arizona and 49th parallel; casual still farther
+ east; migratory in its northern ranges; a silent, heavy
+ flying bird, different in habits and appearance from the
+ other woodpeckers; often seen flycatching.
+
+ 18. MELANERPES CAROLINUS, _Red-bellied Woodpecker_, _Zebra Bird_.
+ Back and wings black, _barred with white_; under and upper
+ tail coverts, middle and outer tail feathers, white varied with
+ black; head and under parts ashy; _belly tinged with reddish_.
+ [M] with whole top of head and nape bright red;
+ [F] with forehead and nape red, crown gray. 9-10
+ inches.
+ Eastern and Southern States between the Hudson River
+ and the Rocky Mountains, north to southern New York,
+ Ohio, southern Michigan, etc.; migratory in its northern
+ ranges.
+
+ 19. MELANERPES AURIFRONS, _Golden-fronted Woodpecker_.
+ Back and wings barred with black and white; rump white; entire
+ under parts brownish white, unspotted (except under tail
+ coverts); primaries unspotted, except at tip; tail black with
+ slightly barred outer feathers; _belly yellowish; forehead and
+ hind neck orange in both sexes_. [M] with _crown
+ red_ set in a larger patch of clear gray; [F]
+ with crown clear gray. 9.5 inches.
+ Central and southern Texas, north to about 33 deg.; breeds
+ wherever found.
+
+ 20. MELANERPES UROPYGIALIS, _Gila Woodpecker_.
+ Back and wings barred with black and white; _head and
+ lower parts smoky brown_; rump black and white; tail barred
+ on inner and outer feathers; primaries unspotted; belly yellow
+ (not conspicuous). [M] with red crown surrounded by
+ brownish; "iris red" (Hayden). 9 inches.
+ Southwestern New Mexico and Arizona to southeastern
+ California, usually above 2000 feet altitude; its distribution
+ depending principally upon the giant cactus.
+
+ 21. COLAPTES AURATUS, _Flicker_, _Yellow-hammer_, _High-hole_,
+ _Clape_.
+ Back and wings (except primaries) brownish gray, barred with
+ black; under parts pale vinaceous spotted with black spots from
+ breast downward; _rump white; tail and wings golden yellow
+ beneath_, dark above, showing the yellow shafts; tail feathers
+ with black tips below; top of head ashy gray, sides of head and
+ throat vinaceous; a broad _black crescent_ across breast, a
+ bright scarlet one on nape. [M] _with black jaw
+ patches_; [F] without them. 12 inches.
+ South Atlantic and Gulf region, north to North Carolina.
+
+ a. _C. a. luteus_, _Northern Flicker_.
+ Larger; paler; black bars above narrower; less black and
+ white below.
+ North from North Carolina and west to the Rocky Mountains;
+ casual farther west; migratory from its northern
+ ranges.
+
+ 22. COLAPTES CAFER, _Red-shafted Flicker_.
+ Color pattern similar to above with the following differences:
+ _wings and tail red beneath_ instead of yellow; throat ashy
+ gray; usually no red on occiput (though some specimens show a
+ narrow crescent). [M] _with red jaw patches_.
+ 12.5-14 inches.
+ Rocky Mountain region west to Pacific coast from
+ Mexico to British Columbia, except northwest coast
+ region of Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia,
+ and occasionally east to Kansas and Nebraska; resident
+ except in the more northern portions of its range.
+
+ a. _C. c. saturatior_, _Northwestern Flicker_.
+ Darker; smaller; narrower breast crescent.
+ Northwest coast, replacing the above, from which it cannot
+ be separated in life.
+
+ 23. COLAPTES CHRYSOIDES, _Gilded Flicker_; _Cactus Flicker_.
+ Color pattern same as _C. auratus_, but throat gray; top of head
+ brown; _occiput without band_; tail band broader and yellow
+ paler than in _C. auratus_. [M] with _jaw patches
+ bright red_; "iris blood red" (Hayden).
+ Central and southern Arizona and Lower California.
+
+ a. _C. c. brunescens_, _Brown Flicker_.
+ A curious subspecies of the last, smaller, with larger,
+ more numerous spots and a smoky brown cast of plumage;
+ black tail band very wide; jaw patches red; wings and tail
+ yellow beneath.
+ Lower (not southern) California; casual only in southern
+ California; in Arizona to 35 deg.
+
+ 24. COLAPTES RUFIPILEUS, _Guadalupe Island Flicker_.
+ Coloration like _C. cafer_, crown decidedly brown; crescent
+ on nape wanting; jaw patches red; wings and tail _red_ beneath.
+ Guadalupe Island off the coast of Lower California.
+
+
+
+
+INDEX
+
+
+ Aard-vark, 104.
+
+ Acorns, eaten by woodpeckers, 46, 51, 57, 58, 59.
+
+ Acquired habits, 61-66.
+
+ Adaptations of woodpeckers to environment,104-109.
+
+ Ant-bear, 104, 106.
+
+ Ants, as food for woodpeckers, 3, 30, 63, 105, 106.
+
+ Argument from design, 110.
+
+
+ Bear, black, 107.
+
+ Beechnuts, as food for woodpeckers, 57, 58, 59.
+
+ Beetles, as food for woodpeckers, 3, 11, 63.
+
+ Bill of woodpeckers as a tool, 68-76.
+
+ Borers, 3, 10, 11, 29, 30, 36.
+
+ Burroughs, John, quoted, 17.
+
+
+ Cacti, woodpeckers nesting in, 20.
+
+ Cannibalism among woodpeckers, 64.
+
+ Carpenter, the. _See_ California woodpecker.
+
+ Carpintero, El. _See_ California woodpecker.
+
+ Caterpillars, as food for woodpeckers, 10, 11, 29, 63.
+
+ Cecropia chrysalids, eaten by woodpeckers, 9.
+
+ Chestnuts, eaten by woodpeckers, 59.
+
+ Chickadee, 16, 21, 25, 30, 32, 74.
+
+ Chipmunks, hoarding food, 60.
+
+ Clape. _See_ Flicker.
+
+ Creeper, brown, 5, 81, 87, 88.
+
+ Crossbills, eating salted food, 31.
+
+ Crow, hoarding habit, 60; 74.
+
+ Cuckoo, ground, 82.
+
+ Cuckoos, yoke-toed, 5, 82.
+
+
+ Drumming of yellow-bellied sapsucker, 16, 17.
+
+
+ Evolution, 109, 112.
+
+
+ Feeding young, how the flicker does it, 24, 25.
+
+ Fence-posts used by woodpeckers, 48, 56, 58.
+
+ Finch, purple, 39.
+
+ Finches, 74.
+
+ Fish-spears, 12, 13.
+
+ Flicker, 6, 7, 15, 18, 20, 23-26, 73, 74, 82, 88, 89, 95, 97-99,
+ 101, 103, 106, 125.
+ brown, 126.
+ cactus, 126.
+ gilded, 126.
+ Guadalupe Island, 127.
+ northern, 126.
+ northwestern, 126.
+ red-shafted, 126.
+
+ Flycatching habits of woodpeckers, 7, 56, 106, 124.
+
+ Foot, of a four-toed woodpecker figured, 77.
+ of a three-toed woodpecker figured, 80.
+ discussed as a tool, 77-85.
+
+
+ Grasshoppers, as food for woodpeckers, 3, 56, 63.
+
+ Grosbeaks, pine, 39.
+
+ Grouse, ruffed, 14, 15.
+
+ Grouse, sharp-tailed, 15.
+
+
+ Hawk, sparrow, 21.
+
+ High-hole. _See_ Flicker.
+
+ Hoarding habits, 62, 63.
+
+ Hummingbird, Anna's, 27.
+
+ Hummingbirds, 25, 103.
+
+ Hyoid bones, 100-103.
+
+
+ Jay, blue, hoarding habit, 53, 60.
+
+
+ Kinglets, 5.
+
+
+ Lightning rods attracting woodpeckers, 18.
+
+ Logcock. _See_ Woodpecker, pileated.
+
+
+ Maple, rock and red, sugar made from, 36.
+
+ Maize, eaten by English sparrows, 62, 65.
+
+ Mandibles of woodpeckers, 13, 101.
+
+ Martin, sand, 20.
+
+ Mice, hoarding habit, 60.
+
+ Migration, dependent upon food supply, 63.
+
+ Mountain-ash trees, sought by woodpeckers, 38.
+
+
+ Nesting of woodpeckers, 20-23.
+
+ Nests, in unusual places, 20.
+
+ North America, ornithologically defined, 114.
+
+ Nuthatches, 5, 21, 30, 81.
+
+
+ Oaks, used by Californian woodpecker for storing nuts, 48, 49.
+
+ Oranges, eaten by woodpeckers, 65, 66.
+
+ Owls, 15, 21, 80.
+
+
+ Pangolin, as an ant-eater, 104.
+
+ Parrot, 13, 82.
+
+ Parroquet, Carolina, 5.
+
+ Pigeon, domestic, 27.
+
+ Pines, acorns stored in, 49.
+
+ "Ploughshare," anchylosed vertebrae of tail, 86.
+
+
+ Ravens, 74.
+
+ Reason in woodpeckers' hoarding, 62.
+
+ Red-head. _See_ Woodpecker, red-headed.
+
+ Robins, 39.
+
+
+ Sap, not used as an insect-lure, 41.
+ how its loss harms the tree, 44, 45.
+
+ Sapsucker, orange, 65. _See, also_, Woodpecker, red-bellied.
+ red-breasted, 122.
+ red-naped, 121.
+ Williamson's, 122.
+ yellow-bellied, 7, 15-17, 33-45, 59, 102, 103, 105, 106.
+
+ Skull of woodpecker figured, 101.
+
+ Sparrow, English _or_ house, 21, 62, 65.
+
+ Spears, 12, 13.
+
+ Spruce, acorns stored in, 47, 49, 53.
+
+ Squirrels, thievishness of, 23, 53.
+
+ Subspecies defined, 114.
+
+ Swallow, eaves _or_ cliff, 61, 64, 65.
+
+ Swallow, tree, 21.
+
+ Swift, chimney, 5, 20, 61, 87, 88.
+
+
+ Tail, shape, 89.
+ number of rectrices, 95.
+ experimental demonstration of shape _a priori_, 91.
+ reason for shape, 98.
+
+ Tail-feathers studied, 94-97.
+
+ Taste in the woodpeckers, 38, 39.
+
+ Telegraph poles resorted to by woodpeckers, 7, 18, 48.
+
+ Thumb, of birds, 80.
+
+ Tin roofs resorted to by woodpeckers, 17, 55.
+
+ Titmouse, crested, 21.
+
+ Toes, numbering of, 79, 80.
+
+ Tongue, appearance of, 99.
+ figured, 99.
+ bones of, 13, 100-103.
+
+ Trogons, yoke-toed, 82.
+
+
+ Vanessa butterfly, 16.
+
+ Vegetable food of woodpeckers, 3, 31.
+
+ Vireos, 30.
+
+
+ Warblers, 30.
+
+ Weevils, not the object in storing nuts, 52.
+
+ Woodpecker, Alaskan three-toed, 121.
+ alpine three-toed, 121.
+ American three-toed, 121.
+ ant-eating, 123.
+ arctic three-toed, 120.
+ Arizona, 120.
+ Batchelder's, 118.
+ black-breasted, 6. _See, also_, Williamson's sapsucker.
+ Cabanis's, 118.
+ Californian, 46-54, 56, 66.
+ downy, 6, 17, 21, 28-33, 59, 63, 70, 74, 83, 86, 88, 95, 107,
+ 114, 118.
+ Gairdner's, 118.
+ Gila, 55, 125.
+ golden-fronted, 55, 102, 125.
+ hairy, 6, 9, 28, 32, 59, 63, 74, 83, 86, 88, 89, 95, 97-99, 107,
+ 114, 117.
+ Harris's, 118.
+ ivory-billed, 70, 71, 73, 83, 88, 89, 93, 97, 98, 107, 117.
+ ladder-backed, 119.
+ Lewis's, 6, 13, 55, 59, 66, 103, 124.
+ narrow-fronted, 124.
+ Nelson's downy, 119.
+ northern hairy, 118.
+ northern pileated, 123.
+ Nuttall's, 119.
+ pileated, 6, 71, 73, 83, 88, 93, 95, 98, 99, 107, 123.
+ red-bellied, 6, 55, 65, 124.
+ red-cockaded, 119.
+ red-headed, 6, 7, 11, 55-58, 60-64, 105, 123.
+ Rocky Mountain, 118.
+ St. Lucas, 119.
+ southern downy, 118.
+ southern hairy, 118.
+ Texan, 119.
+ three-toed, foot figured, 80.
+ white-headed, 120.
+
+ Woodpeckers, advantages of, as subject for study, 2.
+ bill as a tool, 69-73.
+ carpenters or miners, 68.
+ character of, 7, 8.
+ coloration of, 5.
+ coloration of sexes, 6.
+ covered nostrils, 74, 75.
+ favorite haunts, 3, 7.
+ foot, structure and uses, 77.
+ habit of drumming, 17.
+ how to recognize the woodpeckers, 4.
+ inferences from study of bills, 75.
+ hunting borers, 10, 11.
+ nesting, 21, 22.
+ preferred foods, 3, 7.
+ tail, study of, 86-99.
+ winter quarters, 22.
+ wooing, 15.
+
+
+ Yoke-toed feet, 82.
+
+
+ Zebra bird. _See_ Woodpecker, red-bellied.
+
+
+
+
+ The Riverside Press
+
+ _Electrotyped and printed by H. O. Houghton & Co.
+ Cambridge, Mass, U. S. A._
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+
+
+Transcribers Notes
+
+Pickaxe and pick-axe both used in the text
+Various punctuation and other printing errors corrected
+Inconsistent hyphenation of words regularised
+Spelling of reecho (page 16) left intact
+Male symbol shown as [M] Female symbol shown as [F]
+
+
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's The Woodpeckers, by Fannie Hardy Eckstorm
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WOODPECKERS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 35062.txt or 35062.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ https://www.gutenberg.org/3/5/0/6/35062/
+
+Produced by Bryan Ness, Steve Read and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This
+file was produced from images generously made available
+by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+https://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at https://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit https://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
+donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ https://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/35062.zip b/35062.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3a3eae8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/35062.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bd6adef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #35062 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/35062)