summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--448.txt10827
-rw-r--r--448.zipbin0 -> 185852 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
5 files changed, 10843 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/448.txt b/448.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..978122a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/448.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,10827 @@
+**The Project Gutenberg Etext of The Psychology of Revolution**
+#2 in our series by Gustave le Bon
+
+
+Copyright laws are changing all over the world, be sure to check
+the copyright laws for your country before posting these files!!
+
+Please take a look at the important information in this header.
+We encourage you to keep this file on your own disk, keeping an
+electronic path open for the next readers. Do not remove this.
+
+
+**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts**
+
+**Etexts Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971**
+
+*These Etexts Prepared By Hundreds of Volunteers and Donations*
+
+Information on contacting Project Gutenberg to get Etexts, and
+further information is included below. We need your donations.
+
+
+The Psychology of Revolution
+
+Gustave le Bon
+
+February, 1996 [Etext #448]
+
+
+**The Project Gutenberg Etext of The Psychology of Revolution**
+*****This file should be named 448.txt or 448.zip******
+
+
+We are now trying to release all our books one month in advance
+of the official release dates, for time for better editing.
+
+Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till
+midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
+The official release date of all Project Gutenberg Etexts is at
+Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A
+preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
+and editing by those who wish to do so. To be sure you have an
+up to date first edition [xxxxx10x.xxx] please check file sizes
+in the first week of the next month. Since our ftp program has
+a bug in it that scrambles the date [tried to fix and failed] a
+look at the file size will have to do, but we will try to see a
+new copy has at least one byte more or less.
+
+
+Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)
+
+We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The
+fifty hours is one conservative estimate for how long it we take
+to get any etext selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
+searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. This
+projected audience is one hundred million readers. If our value
+per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
+million dollars per hour this year as we release thirty-two text
+files per month: or 400 more Etexts in 1996 for a total of 800.
+If these reach just 10% of the computerized population, then the
+total should reach 80 billion Etexts.
+
+The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away One Trillion Etext
+Files by the December 31, 2001. [10,000 x 100,000,000=Trillion]
+This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
+which is only 10% of the present number of computer users. 2001
+should have at least twice as many computer users as that, so it
+will require us reaching less than 5% of the users in 2001.
+
+
+We need your donations more than ever!
+
+
+All donations should be made to "Project Gutenberg/IBC", and are
+tax deductible to the extent allowable by law ("IBC" is Illinois
+Benedictine College). (Subscriptions to our paper newsletter go
+to IBC, too)
+
+For these and other matters, please mail to:
+
+Project Gutenberg
+P. O. Box 2782
+Champaign, IL 61825
+
+When all other email fails try our Michael S. Hart, Executive
+Director:
+hart@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu (internet) hart@uiucvmd (bitnet)
+
+We would prefer to send you this information by email
+(Internet, Bitnet, Compuserve, ATTMAIL or MCImail).
+
+******
+If you have an FTP program (or emulator), please
+FTP directly to the Project Gutenberg archives:
+[Mac users, do NOT point and click. . .type]
+
+ftp uiarchive.cso.uiuc.edu
+login: anonymous
+password: your@login
+cd etext/etext90 through /etext96
+or cd etext/articles [get suggest gut for more information]
+dir [to see files]
+get or mget [to get files. . .set bin for zip files]
+GET INDEX?00.GUT
+for a list of books
+and
+GET NEW GUT for general information
+and
+MGET GUT* for newsletters.
+
+**Information prepared by the Project Gutenberg legal advisor**
+(Three Pages)
+
+
+***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS**START***
+Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
+They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
+your copy of this etext, even if you got it for free from
+someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
+fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement
+disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how
+you can distribute copies of this etext if you want to.
+
+*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS ETEXT
+By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
+etext, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept
+this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive
+a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this etext by
+sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person
+you got it from. If you received this etext on a physical
+medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request.
+
+ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM ETEXTS
+This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-
+tm etexts, is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor
+Michael S. Hart through the Project Gutenberg Association at
+Illinois Benedictine College (the "Project"). Among other
+things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright
+on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and
+distribute it in the United States without permission and
+without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth
+below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this etext
+under the Project's "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark.
+
+To create these etexts, the Project expends considerable
+efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain
+works. Despite these efforts, the Project's etexts and any
+medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other
+things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
+intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged
+disk or other etext medium, a computer virus, or computer
+codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
+
+LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES
+But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below,
+[1] the Project (and any other party you may receive this
+etext from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext) disclaims all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including
+legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR
+UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT,
+INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
+OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE
+POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
+
+If you discover a Defect in this etext within 90 days of
+receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any)
+you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that
+time to the person you received it from. If you received it
+on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and
+such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement
+copy. If you received it electronically, such person may
+choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to
+receive it electronically.
+
+THIS ETEXT IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS
+TO THE ETEXT OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
+PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or
+the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the
+above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you
+may have other legal rights.
+
+INDEMNITY
+You will indemnify and hold the Project, its directors,
+officers, members and agents harmless from all liability, cost
+and expense, including legal fees, that arise directly or
+indirectly from any of the following that you do or cause:
+[1] distribution of this etext, [2] alteration, modification,
+or addition to the etext, or [3] any Defect.
+
+DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm"
+You may distribute copies of this etext electronically, or by
+disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this
+"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg,
+or:
+
+[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this
+ requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the
+ etext or this "small print!" statement. You may however,
+ if you wish, distribute this etext in machine readable
+ binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form,
+ including any form resulting from conversion by word pro-
+ cessing or hypertext software, but only so long as
+ *EITHER*:
+
+ [*] The etext, when displayed, is clearly readable, and
+ does *not* contain characters other than those
+ intended by the author of the work, although tilde
+ (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may
+ be used to convey punctuation intended by the
+ author, and additional characters may be used to
+ indicate hypertext links; OR
+
+ [*] The etext may be readily converted by the reader at
+ no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent
+ form by the program that displays the etext (as is
+ the case, for instance, with most word processors);
+ OR
+
+ [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at
+ no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the
+ etext in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC
+ or other equivalent proprietary form).
+
+[2] Honor the etext refund and replacement provisions of this
+ "Small Print!" statement.
+
+[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Project of 20% of the
+ net profits you derive calculated using the method you
+ already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you
+ don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are
+ payable to "Project Gutenberg Association / Illinois
+ Benedictine College" within the 60 days following each
+ date you prepare (or were legally required to prepare)
+ your annual (or equivalent periodic) tax return.
+
+WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO?
+The Project gratefully accepts contributions in money, time,
+scanning machines, OCR software, public domain etexts, royalty
+free copyright licenses, and every other sort of contribution
+you can think of. Money should be paid to "Project Gutenberg
+Association / Illinois Benedictine College".
+
+*END*THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS*Ver.04.29.93*END*
+
+
+
+
+
+Scanned by Charles Keller with
+OmniPage Professional OCR software
+donated by Caere Corporation, 1-800-535-7226.
+Contact Mike Lough <Mikel@caere.com>
+
+
+
+
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGY OF REVOLUTION
+BY
+GUSTAVE LE BON
+
+
+
+
+CONTENTS
+
+INTRODUCTION. THE REVISION OF HISTORY
+PART I
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ELEMENTS OF REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENTS
+
+
+BOOK I
+
+GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF REVOLUTIONS
+
+CHAPTER I. SCIENTIFIC AND POLITICAL REVOLUTIONS
+1. Classification of Revolutions
+2. Scientific Revolutions
+3. Political Revolutions
+4. The results of Political Revolutions
+
+CHAPTER II. RELIGIOUS REVOLUTIONS
+1. The importance of the study of Religious Revolutions in
+ respect of the comprehension of the great Political
+ Revolutions
+2. The beginnings of the Reformation and its first
+ disciples
+3. Rational value of the doctrines of the Reformation
+4. Propagation of the Reformation
+5. Conflict between different religious beliefs. The
+ impossibility of tolerance
+6. The results of Religious Revolutions
+
+CHAPTER III. THE ACTION OF GOVERNMENTS IN REVOLUTIONS
+1. The feeble resistance of Governments in time of
+ Revolution
+2. How the resistance of Governments may overcome
+ Revolution
+3. Revolutions effected by Governments. Examples: China,
+ Turkey, &c
+4. Social elements which survive the changes of Government
+ after Revolution
+
+CHAPTER IV. THE PART PLAYED BY THE PEOPLE IN REVOLUTIONS
+1. The stability and malleability Of the national mind
+2. How the People regards Revolution
+3. The supposed part of the People during Revolution
+4. The popular entity and its constituent elements
+
+BOOK II
+
+THE FORMS OF MENTALITY PREVALENT DURING REVOLUTION
+
+CHAPTER I. INDIVIDUAL VARIATIONS OF CHARACTER IN TIME OF
+ REVOLUTION
+1. Transformations of Personality
+2. Elements of character predominant in time of Revolution
+
+CHAPTER II. THE MYSTIC MENTALITY AND THE JACOBIN MENTALITY
+1. Classification of mentalities predominant in time of
+ Revolution
+2. The Mystic Mentality
+3. The Jacobin Mentality
+
+CHAPTER III. THE REVOLUTIONARY AND CRIMINAL MENTALITIES
+1. The Revolutionary Mentality
+2. The Criminal Mentality
+
+CHAPTER IV. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF REVOLUTIONARY CROWDS
+1. General characteristics of the crowd
+2. How the stability of the racial mind limits the
+ oscillations of the mind of the crowd
+3. The role of the leader in Revolutionary Movements
+
+CHAPTER V. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE REVOLUTIONARY ASSEMBLIES
+1. Psychological characteristics of the great Revolutionary
+ Assemblies
+2. The Psychology of the Revolutionary Clubs
+3. A suggested explanation of the progressive exaggeration
+ of sentiments in assemblies
+
+PART II
+
+BOOK I
+
+THE ORIGINS OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
+
+CHAPTER 1. THE OPINIONS OF HISTORIANS CONCERNING THE FRENCH
+ REVOLUTION
+1. The Historians of the Revolution
+2. The theory of Fatalism in respect of the Revolution
+3. The hesitation of recent Historians of the Revolution
+4. Impartiality in History
+
+CHAPTER II. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE ANCIEN REGIME
+1. The Absolute Monarchy and the Basis of the Ancien Regime
+2. The inconveniences of the Ancien Regime
+3. Life under the Ancien Regime
+4. Evolution of Monarchical feeling during the Revolution
+
+CHAPTER III. MENTAL ANARCHY AT THE TIME OF THE REVOLUTION
+ AND THE INFLUENCE ATTRIBUTED TO THE PHILOSOPHERS
+1. Origin and Propagation of Revolutionary Ideas
+2. The supposed influence of the Philosophers of the
+ eighteenth century upon the Genesis of the Revolution.
+ Their dislike of Democracy
+3. The philosophical ideas of the Bourgeoisie at the time of
+ the Revolution
+
+CHAPTER IV. PSYCHOLOGICAL ILLUSIONS RESPECTING THE FRENCH
+ REVOLUTION
+1. Illusions respecting Primitive Man, the return to the
+ State of Nature, and the Psychology of the People
+2. Illusions respecting the possibility of separating Man
+ from his Past and the power of Transformation attributed
+ to the Law
+3. Illusions respecting the Theoretical Value of the great
+ Revolutionary Principles
+
+BOOK II
+
+THE RATIONAL, AFFECTIVE, MYSTIC, AND COLLECTIVE INFLUENCES ACTIVE
+DURING THE REVOLUTION
+
+CHAPTER I. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY
+1. Psychological influences active during the French
+Revolution
+2. Dissolution of the Ancien Regime. The assembling of
+ the States General
+3. The constituent Assembly
+
+CHAPTER II. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
+1. Political events during the life of the Legislative
+ Assembly
+2. Mental characteristics of the Legislative Assembly
+
+CHAPTER III. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE CONVENTION
+1. The Legend of the Convention
+2. Results of the triumph of the Jacobin Religion
+3. Mental characteristics of the Convention
+
+CHAPTER IV. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE CONVENTION
+1. The activity of the Clubs and the Commune during the
+ Convention
+2. The Government of France during the Convention: the
+ Terror
+3. The End of the Convention. The Beginnings of the
+ Directory
+
+CHAPTER V. INSTANCES OF REVOLUTIONARY VIOLENCE
+1. Psychological Causes of Revolutionary Violence
+2. The Revolutionary Tribunals
+3. The Terror in the Provinces
+
+CHAPTER VI. THE ARMIES OF THE REVOLUTION
+1. The Revolutionary Assemblies and the Armies
+2. The Struggle of Europe against the Revolution
+3. Psychological and Military Factors which determined the
+ success of the Revolutionary Armies
+
+CHAPTER VII. PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LEADERS OF THE REVOLUTION
+
+1. Mentality of the men of the Revolution. The respective
+ influence of violent and feeble characters
+2. Psychology of the Commissaries or Representatives
+ ``on Mission''
+3. Danton and Robespierre
+4. Fouquier-Tinville, Marat, Billaud-Varenne, &c.
+5. The destiny of those Members of the Convention who
+ survived the Revolution
+
+BOOK III
+
+THE CONFLICT BETWEEN ANCESTRAL INFLUENCES AND REVOLUTIONARY
+PRINCIPLES
+
+CHAPTER I. THE LAST CONVULSIONS OF ANARCHY. THE DIRECTORY
+1. Psychology of the Directory
+2. Despotic Government of the Directory. Recrudescence of
+ the Terror
+3. The Advent of Bonaparte
+4. Causes of the Duration of the Revolution
+
+CHAPTER II. THE RESTORATION OF ORDER. THE CONSULAR REPUBLIC
+1. How the work of the Revolution was confirmed by the
+ Consulate
+2. The re-organisation of France by the Consulate
+3. Psychological elements which determined the success of
+ the work of the Consulate
+
+CHAPTER III. POLITICAL RESULTS OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN
+TRADITIONS AND THE REVOLUTIONARY PRINCIPLES DURING THE
+LAST CENTURY
+1. The psychological causes of the continued Revolutionary
+ Movements to which France has been subject
+2. Summary of a century's Revolutionary Movements in France
+
+
+PART III
+
+THE RECENT EVOLUTION OF THE REVOLUTIONARY PRINCIPLES
+
+CHAPTER I. THE PROGRESS OF DEMOCRATIC BELIEFS SINCE THE
+ REVOLUTION
+1. Gradual propagation of Democratic Ideas after the
+ Revolution
+2. The unequal influence of the three fundamental principles
+ of the Revolution
+3. The Democracy of the ``Intellectuals'' and Popular
+ Democracy
+4. Natural Inequalities and Democratic Equalisation
+
+CHAPTER II. THE RESULTS OF DEMOCRATIC EVOLUTION
+1. The influence upon social evolution of theories of no
+ rational value
+2. The Jacobin Spirit and the Mentality created by
+ Democratic Beliefs
+3. Universal Suffrage and its representatives
+4. The craving for Reforms
+5. Social distinctions in Democracies and Democratic Ideas
+ in various countries
+
+CHAPTER III. THE NEW FORMS OF DEMOCRATIC BELIEF
+1. The conflict between Capital and Labour
+2. The evolution of the Working Classes and the Syndicalist
+ Movement
+3. Why certain modern Democratic Governments are gradually
+ being transformed into Governments by Administrative
+ Castes
+
+CONCLUSIONS
+
+
+
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGY OF REVOLUTION
+
+INTRODUCTION
+
+THE REVISION OF HISTORY
+
+The present age is not merely an epoch of discovery; it is also a
+period of revision of the various elements of knowledge. Having
+recognised that there are no phenomena of which the first cause
+is still accessible, science has resumed the examination of her
+ancient certitudes, and has proved their fragility. To-day she
+sees her ancient principles vanishing one by one. Mechanics is
+losing its axioms, and matter, formerly the eternal substratum of
+the worlds, becomes a simple aggregate of ephemeral forces in
+transitory condensation.
+
+Despite its conjectural side, by virtue of which it to some
+extent escapes the severest form of criticism, history has not
+been free from this universal revision. There is no longer a
+single one of its phases of which we can say that it is certainly
+known. What appeared to be definitely acquired is now once more
+put in question.
+
+Among the events whose study seemed completed was the French
+Revolution. Analysed by several generations of writers, one
+might suppose it to be perfectly elucidated. What new thing can
+be said of it, except in modification of some of its details?
+
+And yet its most positive defenders are beginning to hesitate in
+their judgments. Ancient evidence proves to be far from
+impeccable. The faith in dogmas once held sacred is shaken. The
+latest literature of the Revolution betrays these uncertainties.
+Having related, men are more and more chary of drawing
+conclusions.
+
+Not only are the heroes of this great drama discussed without
+indulgence, but thinkers are asking whether the new dispensation
+which followed the ancien regime would not have established
+itself naturally, without violence, in the course of progressive
+civilisation. The results obtained no longer seem in
+correspondence either with their immediate cost or with the
+remoter consequences which the Revolution evoked from the
+possibilities of history.
+
+Several causes have led to the revision of this tragic period.
+Time has calmed passions, numerous documents have gradually
+emerged from the archives, and the historian is learning to
+interpret them independently.
+
+But it is perhaps modern psychology that has most effectually
+influenced our ideas, by enabling us more surely to read men and
+the motives of their conduct.
+
+Among those of its discoveries which are henceforth applicable to
+history we must mention, above all, a more profound understanding
+of ancestral influences, the laws which rule the actions of the
+crowd, data relating to the disaggregation of personality, mental
+contagion, the unconscious formation of beliefs, and the
+distinction between the various forms of logic.
+
+To tell the truth, these applications of science, which are
+utilised in this book, have not been so utilised hitherto.
+Historians have generally stopped short at the study of
+documents, and even that study is sufficient to excite the doubts
+of which I have spoken.
+
+
+The great events which shape the destinies of peoples--
+revolutions, for example, and the outbreak of religious beliefs--
+are sometimes so difficult to explain that one must limit oneself
+to a mere statement.
+
+From the time of my first historical researches I have been
+struck by the impenetrable aspect of certain essential phenomena,
+those relating to the genesis of beliefs especially; I felt
+convinced that something fundamental was lacking that was
+essential to their interpretation. Reason having said all it
+could say, nothing more could be expected of it, and other means
+must be sought of comprehending what had not been elucidated.
+
+For a long time these important questions remained obscure to me.
+Extended travel, devoted to the study of the remnants of vanished
+civilisations, had not done much to throw light upon them.
+
+Reflecting upon it continually, I was forced to recognise that
+the problem was composed of a series of other problems, which I
+should have to study separately. This I did for a period of
+twenty years, presenting the results of my researches in a
+succession of volumes.
+
+One of the first was devoted to the study of the psychological
+laws of the evolution of peoples. Having shown that the
+historic races--that is, the races formed by the hazards of
+history--finally acquired psychological characteristics as stable
+as their anatomical characteristics, I attempted to explain how a
+people transforms its institutions, its languages, and its arts.
+I explained in the same work why it was that individual
+personalities, under the influence of sudden variations of
+environment, might be entirely disaggregated.
+
+But besides the fixed collectivities formed by the peoples, there
+are mobile and transitory collectivities known as crowds. Now
+these crowds or mobs, by the aid of which the great movements of
+history are accomplished, have characteristics absolutely
+different from those of the individuals who compose them. What
+are these characteristics, and how are they evolved? This new
+problem was examined in The Psychology of the Crowd.
+
+Only after these studies did I begin to perceive certain
+influences which had escaped me.
+
+But this was not all. Among the most important factors of
+history one was preponderant--the factor of beliefs. How are
+these beliefs born, and are they really rational and voluntary,
+as was long taught? Are they not rather unconscious and
+independent of all reason? A difficult question, which I dealt
+with in my last book, Opinions and Beliefs.
+
+So long as psychology regards beliefs as voluntary and rational
+they will remain inexplicable. Having proved that they are
+usually irrational and always involuntary, I was able to propound
+the solution of this important problem; how it was that beliefs
+which no reason could justify were admitted without
+difficulty by the most enlightened spirits of all ages.
+
+The solution of the historical difficulties which had so long
+been sought was thenceforth obvious. I arrived at the conclusion
+that beside the rational logic which conditions thought, and was
+formerly regarded as our sole guide, there exist very different
+forms of logic: affective logic, collective logic, and mystic
+logic, which usually overrule the reason and engender the
+generative impulses of our conduct.
+
+This fact well established, it seemed to me evident that if a
+great number of historical events are often uncomprehended, it is
+because we seek to interpret them in the light of a logic which
+in reality has very little influence upon their genesis.
+
+
+All these researches, which are here summed up in a few lines,
+demanded long years for their accomplishment. Despairing of
+completing them, I abandoned them more than once to return to
+those labours of the laboratory in which one is always sure of
+skirting the truth and of acquiring fragments at least of
+certitude.
+
+But while it is very interesting to explore the world of material
+phenomena, it is still more so to decipher men, for which reason
+I have always been led back to psychology.
+
+Certain principles deduced from my researches appearing likely to
+prove fruitful, I resolved to apply them to the study of concrete
+instances, and was thus led to deal with the Psychology of
+Revolutions--notably that of the French Revolution.
+
+Proceeding in the analysis of our great Revolution, the
+greater part of the opinions determined by the reading of books
+deserted me one by one, although I had considered them
+unshakable.
+
+To explain this period we must consider it as a whole, as many
+historians have done. It is composed of phenomena simultaneous
+but independent of one another.
+
+Each of its phases reveals events engendered by psychological
+laws working with the regularity of clockwork. The actors in
+this great drama seem to move like the characters of a previously
+determined drama. Each says what he must say, acts as he is
+bound to act.
+
+To be sure, the actors in the revolutionary drama differed from
+those of a written drama in that they had not studied their
+parts, but these were dictated by invisible forces.
+
+Precisely because they were subjected to the inevitable
+progression of logics incomprehensible to them we see them as
+greatly astonished by the events of which they were the heroes as
+are we ourselves. Never did they suspect the invisible powers
+which forced them to act. They were the masters neither of their
+fury nor their weakness. They spoke in the name of reason,
+pretending to be guided by reason, but in reality it was by no
+means reason that impelled them.
+
+``The decisions for which we are so greatly reproached,'' wrote
+Billaud-Varenne, ``were more often than otherwise not intended or
+desired by us two days or even one day beforehand: the crisis
+alone evoked them.''
+
+Not that we must consider the events of the Revolution as
+dominated by an imperious fatality. The readers of our works
+will know that we recognise in the man of superior qualities the
+role of averting fatalities. But he can dissociate himself
+only from a few of such, and is often powerless before the
+sequence of events which even at their origin could scarcely be
+ruled. The scientist knows how to destroy the microbe before it
+has time to act, but he knows himself powerless to prevent the
+evolution of the resulting malady.
+
+
+When any question gives rise to violently contradictory opinions
+we may be sure that it belongs to the province of beliefs and not
+to that of knowledge.
+
+We have shown in a preceding work that belief, of unconscious
+origin and independent of all reason, can never be influenced by
+reason.
+
+The Revolution, the work of believers, has seldom been judged by
+any but believers. Execrated by some and praised by others, it
+has remained one of those dogmas which are accepted or rejected
+as a whole, without the intervention of rational logic.
+
+Although in its beginnings a religious or political revolution
+may very well be supported by rational elements, it is developed
+only by the aid of mystic and affective elements which are
+absolutely foreign to reason.
+
+The historians who have judged the events of the French
+Revolution in the name of rational logic could not comprehend
+them, since this form of logic did not dictate them. As the
+actors of these events themselves understood them but ill, we
+shall not be far from the truth in saying that our
+Revolution was a phenomenon equally misunderstood by those
+who caused it and by those who have described it. At no period
+of history did men so little grasp the present, so greatly ignore
+the past, and so poorly divine the future.
+
+
+. . . The power of the Revolution did not reside in the
+principles--which for that matter were anything but novel--which
+it sought to propagate, nor in the institutions which it sought
+to found. The people cares very little for institutions and even
+less for doctrines. That the Revolution was potent indeed, that
+it made France accept the violence, the murders, the ruin and the
+horror of a frightful civil war, that finally it defended itself
+victoriously against a Europe in arms, was due to the fact that
+it had founded not a new system of government but a new religion.
+
+Now history shows us how irresistible is the might of a strong
+belief. Invincible Rome herself had to bow before the armies of
+nomad shepherds illuminated by the faith of Mahommed. For the
+same reason the kings of Europe could not resist the
+tatterdemalion soldiers of the Convention. Like all apostles,
+they were ready to immolate themselves in the sole end of
+propagating their beliefs, which according to their dream were to
+renew the world.
+
+The religion thus founded had the force of other religions, if
+not their duration. Yet it did not perish without leaving
+indelible traces, and its influence is active still.
+
+
+We shall not consider the Revolution as a clean sweep in
+history, as its apostles believed it. We know that to
+demonstrate their intention of creating a world distinct from the
+old they initiated a new era and professed to break entirely with
+all vestiges of the past.
+
+But the past never dies. It is even more truly within us than
+without us. Against their will the reformers of the Revolution
+remained saturated with the past, and could only continue, under
+other names, the traditions of the monarchy, even exaggerating
+the autocracy and centralisation of the old system. Tocqueville
+had no difficulty in proving that the Revolution did little but
+overturn that which was about to fall.
+
+If in reality the Revolution destroyed but little it favoured the
+fruition of certain ideas which continued thenceforth to develop.
+
+The fraternity and liberty which it proclaimed never greatly
+seduced the peoples, but equality became their gospel: the pivot
+of socialism and of the entire evolution of modern democratic
+ideas. We may therefore say that the Revolution did not end with
+the advent of the Empire, nor with the successive restorations
+which followed it. Secretly or in the light of day it has slowly
+unrolled itself and still affects men's minds.
+
+
+The study of the French Revolution to which a great part of this
+book is devoted will perhaps deprive the reader of more than one
+illusion, by proving to him that the books which recount the
+history of the Revolution contain in reality a mass of legends
+very remote from reality.
+
+These legends will doubtless retain more life than history
+itself. Do not regret this too greatly. It may interest a few
+philosophers to know the truth, but the peoples will always
+prefer dreams. Synthetising their ideal, such dreams will always
+constitute powerful motives of action. One would lose courage
+were it not sustained by false ideas, said Fontenelle. Joan of
+Arc, the Giants of the Convention, the Imperial epic--all these
+dazzling images of the past will always remain sources of hope in
+the gloomy hours that follow defeat. They form part of that
+patrimony of illusions left us by our fathers, whose power is
+often greater than that of reality. The dream, the ideal, the
+legend--in a word, the unreal--it is that which shapes history.
+
+
+PART I
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ELEMENTS OF REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENTS
+
+
+
+BOOK I
+
+GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF REVOLUTIONS
+
+CHAPTER I
+
+SCIENTIFIC AND POLITICAL REVOLUTIONS
+
+1. Classification of Revolutions.
+
+We generally apply the term revolution to sudden political
+changes, but the expression may be employed to denote all sudden
+transformations, or transformations apparently sudden, whether of
+beliefs, ideas, or doctrines.
+
+We have considered elsewhere the part played by the rational,
+affective, and mystic factors in the genesis of the opinions and
+beliefs which determine conduct. We need not therefore return to
+the subject here.
+
+A revolution may finally become a belief, but it often commences
+under the action of perfectly rational motives: the suppression
+of crying abuses, of a detested despotic government, or an
+unpopular sovereign, &c.
+
+Although the origin of a revolution may be perfectly rational, we
+must not forget that the reasons invoked in preparing for it do
+not influence the crowd until they have been transformed
+into sentiments. Rational logic can point to the abuses to be
+destroyed, but to move the multitude its hopes must be awakened.
+This can only be effected by the action of the affective and
+mystic elements which give man the power to act. At the time of
+the French Revolution, for example, rational logic, in the hands
+of the philosophers, demonstrated the inconveniences of the
+ancien regime, and excited the desire to change it. Mystic
+logic inspired belief in the virtues of a society created in all
+its members according to certain principles. Affective logic
+unchained the passions confined by the bonds of ages and led to
+the worst excesses. Collective logic ruled the clubs and the
+Assemblies and impelled their members to actions which neither
+rational nor affective nor mystic logic would ever have caused
+them to commit.
+
+Whatever its origin, a revolution is not productive of results
+until it has sunk into the soul of the multitude. Then events
+acquire special forms resulting from the peculiar psychology of
+crowds. Popular movements for this reason have characteristics
+so pronounced that the description of one will enable us to
+comprehend the others.
+
+The multitude is, therefore, the agent of a revolution; but not
+its point of departure. The crowd represents an amorphous being
+which can do nothing, and will nothing, without a head to lead
+it. It will quickly exceed the impulse once received, but it
+never creates it.
+
+The sudden political revolutions which strike the historian most
+forcibly are often the least important. The great revolutions
+are those of manners and thought. Changing the name of a
+government does not transform the mentality of a people. To
+overthrow the institutions of a people is not to re-shape its
+soul.
+
+The true revolutions, those which transform the destinies of the
+peoples, are most frequently accomplished so slowly that the
+historians can hardly point to their beginnings. The term
+evolution is, therefore, far more appropriate than revolution.
+
+The various elements we have enumerated as entering into the
+genesis of the majority of revolutions will not suffice to
+classify them. Considering only the designed object, we will
+divide them into scientific revolutions, political revolutions,
+and religious revolutions.
+
+2. Scientific Revolutions.
+
+
+Scientific revolutions are by far the most important. Although
+they attract but little attention, they are often fraught with
+remote consequences, such as are not engendered by political
+revolutions. We will therefore put them first, although we
+cannot study them here.
+
+For instance, if our conceptions of the universe have profoundly
+changed since the time of the Revolution, it is because
+astronomical discoveries and the application of experimental
+methods have revolutionised them, by demonstrating that
+phenomena, instead of being conditioned by the caprices of the
+gods, are ruled by invariable laws.
+
+Such revolutions are fittingly spoken of as evolution, on account
+of their slowness. But there are others which, although of the
+same order, deserve the name of revolution by reason of their
+rapidity: we may instance the theories of Darwin,
+overthrowing the whole science of biology in a few years; the
+discoveries of Pasteur, which revolutionised medicine during the
+lifetime of their author; and the theory of the dissociation of
+matter, proving that the atom, formerly supposed to be eternal,
+is not immune from the laws which condemn all the elements of the
+universe to decline and perish.
+
+These scientific revolutions in the domain of ideas are purely
+intellectual. Our sentiments and beliefs do not affect them.
+Men submit to them without discussing them. Their results being
+controllable by experience, they escape all criticism.
+
+
+3. Political Revolutions.
+
+
+Beneath and very remote from these scientific revolutions, which
+generate the progress of civilisations, are the religious and
+political revolutions, which have no kinship with them. While
+scientific revolutions derive solely from rational elements,
+political and religious beliefs are sustained almost exclusively
+by affective and mystic factors. Reason plays only a feeble part
+in their genesis.
+
+I insisted at some length in my book Opinions and Beliefs on
+the affective and mystic origin of beliefs, showing that a
+political or religious belief constitutes an act of faith
+elaborated in unconsciousness, over which, in spite of all
+appearances, reason has no hold. I also showed that belief often
+reaches such a degree of intensity that nothing can be opposed to
+it. The man hypnotised by his faith becomes an Apostle, ready to
+sacrifice his interests, his happiness, and even his life for the
+triumph of his faith. The absurdity of his belief matters
+little; for him it is a burning reality. Certitudes of mystic
+origin possess the marvellous power of entire domination over
+thought, and can only be affected by time.
+
+By the very fact that it is regarded as an absolute truth a
+belief necessarily becomes intolerant. This explains the
+violence, hatred, and persecution which were the habitual
+accompaniments of the great political and religious revolutions,
+notably of the Reformation and the French Revolution.
+
+Certain periods of French history remain incomprehensible if we
+forget the affective and mystic origin of beliefs, their
+necessary intolerance, the impossibility of reconciling them when
+they come into mutual contact, and, finally, the power conferred
+by mystic beliefs upon the sentiments which place themselves at
+their service.
+
+The foregoing conceptions are too novel as yet to have modified
+the mentality of the historians. They will continue to attempt
+to explain, by means of rational logic, a host of phenomena which
+are foreign to it.
+
+Events such as the Reformation, which overwhelmed France for a
+period of fifty years, were in no wise determined by rational
+influences. Yet rational influences are always invoked in
+explanation, even in the most recent works. Thus, in the
+General History of Messrs. Lavisse and Rambaud, we read the
+following explanation of the Reformation:--
+
+``It was a spontaneous movement, born here and there amidst the
+people, from the reading of the Gospels and the free individual
+reflections which were suggested to simple persons by an
+extremely pious conscience and a very bold reasoning power.''
+
+Contrary to the assertion of these historians, we may say with
+certainty, in the first place, that such movements are never
+spontaneous, and secondly, that reason takes no part in their
+elaboration.
+
+The force of the political and religious beliefs which have moved
+the world resides precisely in the fact that, being born of
+affective and mystic elements, they are neither created nor
+directed by reason.
+
+Political or religious beliefs have a common origin and obey the
+same laws. They are formed not with the aid of reason, but more
+often contrary to all reason. Buddhism, Islamism, the
+Reformation, Jacobinism, Socialism, &c., seem very different
+forms of thought. Yet they have identical affective and mystic
+bases, and obey a logic that has no affinity with rational logic.
+
+Political revolutions may result from beliefs established in the
+minds of men, but many other causes produce them. The word
+discontent sums them up. As soon as discontent is generalised a
+party is formed which often becomes strong enough to struggle
+against the Government.
+
+Discontent must generally have been accumulating for a long time
+in order to produce its effects. For this reason a revolution
+does not always represent a phenomenon in process of termination
+followed by another which is commencing but rather a continuous
+phenomenon, having somewhat accelerated its evolution. All the
+modern revolutions, however, have been abrupt movements,
+entailing the instantaneous overthrow of governments. Such, for
+example, were the Brazilian, Portuguese, Turkish, and Chinese
+revolutions.
+
+To the contrary of what might be supposed, the very conservative
+peoples are addicted to the most violent revolutions. Being
+conservative, they are not able to evolve slowly, or to adapt
+themselves to variations of environment, so that when the
+discrepancy becomes too extreme they are bound to adapt
+themselves suddenly. This sudden evolution constitutes a
+revolution.
+
+Peoples able to adapt themselves progressively do not always
+escape revolution. It was only by means of a revolution that the
+English, in 1688, were able to terminate the struggle which had
+dragged on for a century between the monarchy, which sought to
+make itself absolute, and the nation, which claimed the right to
+govern itself through the medium of its representatives.
+
+The great revolutions have usually commenced from the top, not
+from the bottom; but once the people is unchained it is to the
+people that revolution owes its might.
+
+It is obvious that revolutions have never taken place, and will
+never take place, save with the aid of an important fraction of
+the army. Royalty did not disappear in France on the day when
+Louis XVI. was guillotined, but at the precise moment when his
+mutinous troops refused to defend him.
+
+It is more particularly by mental contagion that armies become
+disaffected, being indifferent enough at heart to the established
+order of things. As soon as the coalition of a few officers had
+succeeded in overthrowing the Turkish Government the Greek
+officers thought to imitate them and to change their government,
+although there was no analogy between the two regimes.
+
+A military movement may overthrow a government--and in the
+Spanish republics the Government is hardly ever destroyed by any
+other means--but if the revolution is to be productive of great
+results it must always be based upon general discontent and
+general hopes.
+
+Unless it is universal and excessive, discontent alone is not
+sufficient to bring about a revolution. It is easy to lead a
+handful of men to pillage, destroy, and massacre, but to raise a
+whole people, or any great portion of that people, calls for the
+continuous or repeated action of leaders. These exaggerate the
+discontent; they persuade the discontented that the government is
+the sole cause of all the trouble, especially of the prevailing
+dearth, and assure men that the new system proposed by them will
+engender an age of felicity. These ideas germinate, propagating
+themselves by suggestion and contagion, and the moment arrives
+when the revolution is ripe.
+
+In this fashion the Christian Revolution and the French
+Revolution were prepared. That the latter was effected in a few
+years, while the first required many, was due to the fact that
+the French Revolution promptly had an armed force at its
+disposal, while Christianity was long in winning material power.
+In the beginning its only adepts were the lowly, the poor, and
+the slaves, filled with enthusiasm by the prospect of seeing
+their miserable life transformed into an eternity of delight. By
+a phenomenon of contagion from below, of which history affords us
+more than one example, the doctrine finally invaded the upper
+strata of the nation, but it was a long time before an
+emperor considered the new faith sufficiently widespread to be
+adopted as the official religion.
+
+
+4. The Results of Political Revolutions.
+
+
+When a political party is triumphant it naturally seeks to
+organise society in accordance with its interests. The
+organisation will differ accordingly as the revolution has been
+effected by the soldiers, the Radicals, or the Conservatives, &c.
+
+The new laws and institutions will depend on the interests of the
+triumphant party and of the classes which have assisted it--the
+clergy for instance.
+
+If the revolution has triumphed only after a violent struggle, as
+was the case with the French Revolution, the victors will reject
+at one sweep the whole arsenal of the old law. The supporters of
+the fallen regime will be persecuted, exiled, or exterminated.
+
+The maximum of violence in these persecutions is attained when
+the triumphant party is defending a belief in addition to its
+material interests. Then the conquered need hope for no pity.
+Thus may be explained the expulsion of the Moors from Spain, the
+autodafes of the Inquisition, the executions of the
+Convention, and the recent laws against the religious
+congregations in France.
+
+The absolute power which is assumed by the victors leads them
+sometimes to extreme measures, such as the Convention's decree
+that gold was to be replaced by paper, that goods were to be sold
+at determined prices, &c. Very soon it runs up against a wall of
+unavoidable necessities, which turn opinion against its tyranny,
+and finally leave it defenceless before attack, as befell at the
+end of the French Revolution. The same thing happened
+recently to a Socialist Australian ministry composed almost
+exclusively of working-men. It enacted laws so absurd, and
+accorded such privileges to the trade unions, that public opinion
+rebelled against it so unanimously that in three months it was
+overthrown.
+
+But the cases we have considered are exceptional. The majority
+of revolutions have been accomplished in order to place a new
+sovereign in power. Now this sovereign knows very well that the
+first condition of maintaining his power consists in not too
+exclusively favouring a single class, but in seeking to
+conciliate all. To do this he will establish a sort of
+equilibrium between them, so as not to be dominated by any one of
+these classes. To allow one class to become predominant is to
+condemn himself presently to accept that class as his master.
+This law is one of the most certain of political psychology. The
+kings of France understood it very well when they struggled so
+energetically against the encroachments first of the nobility and
+then of the clergy. If they had not done so their fate would
+have been that of the German Emperors of the Middle Ages, who,
+excommunicated by the Pope, were reduced, like Henry IV. at
+Canossa, to make a pilgrimage and humbly to sue for the Pope's
+forgiveness.
+
+This same law has continually been verified during the course of
+history. When at the end of the Roman Empire the military caste
+became preponderant, the emperors depended entirely upon their
+soldiers, who appointed and deposed them at will.
+
+It was therefore a great advantage for France that she was so
+long governed by a monarch almost absolute, supposed to
+hold his power by divine right, and surrounded therefore by a
+considerable prestige. Without such an authority he could have
+controlled neither the feudal nobility, nor the clergy, nor the
+parliaments. If Poland, towards the end of the sixteenth
+century, had also possessed an absolute and respected monarchy,
+she would not have descended the path of decadence which led to
+her disappearance from the map of Europe.
+
+We have shewn in this chapter that political revolutions may be
+accompanied by important social transformations. We shall soon
+see how slight are these transformations compared to those
+produced by religious revolutions.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER II
+
+RELIGIOUS REVOLUTIONS
+
+1. The importance of the study of Religious Revolutions in
+respect of the comprehension of the great Political Revolutions.
+
+
+A portion of this work will be devoted to the French Revolution.
+It was full of acts of violence which naturally had their
+psychological causes.
+
+These exceptional events will always fill us with astonishment,
+and we even feel them to be inexplicable. They become
+comprehensible, however, if we consider that the French
+Revolution, constituting a new religion, was bound to obey the
+laws which condition the propagation of all beliefs. Its fury
+and its hecatombs will then become intelligible.
+
+In studying the history of a great religious revolution, that of
+the Reformation, we shall see that a number of psychological
+elements which figured therein were equally active during the
+French Revolution. In both we observe the insignificant bearing
+of the rational value of a belief upon its propagation, the
+inefficacy of persecution, the impossibility of tolerance between
+contrary beliefs, and the violence and the desperate struggles
+resulting from the conflict of different faiths. We also observe
+the exploitation of a belief by interests quite independent
+of that belief. Finally we see that it is impossible to modify
+the convictions of men without also modifying their existence.
+
+These phenomena verified, we shall see plainly why the gospel of
+the Revolution was propagated by the same methods as all the
+religious gospels, notably that of Calvin. It could not have
+been propagated otherwise.
+
+But although there are close analogies between the genesis of a
+religious revolution, such as the Reformation, and that of a
+great political revolution like our own, their remote
+consequences are very different, which explains the difference of
+duration which they display. In religious revolutions no
+experience can reveal to the faithful that they are deceived,
+since they would have to go to heaven to make the discovery. In
+political revolutions experience quickly demonstrates the error
+of a false doctrine and forces men to abandon it.
+
+Thus at the end of the Directory the application of Jacobin
+beliefs had led France to such a degree of ruin, poverty, and
+despair that the wildest Jacobins themselves had to renounce
+their system. Nothing survived of their theories except a few
+principles which cannot be verified by experience, such as the
+universal happiness which equality should bestow upon humanity.
+
+
+2. The beginnings of the Reformation and its first disciples.
+
+
+The Reformation was finally to exercise a profound influence upon
+the sentiments and moral ideas of a great proportion of mankind.
+Modest in its beginnings, it was at first a simple struggle
+against the abuses of the clergy, and, from a practical point of
+view, a return to the prescriptions of the Gospel. It never
+constituted, as has been claimed, an aspiration towards freedom
+of thought. Calvin was as intolerant as Robespierre, and all the
+theorists of the age considered that the religion of subjects
+must be that of the prince who governed them. Indeed in every
+country where the Reformation was established the sovereign
+replaced the Pope of Rome, with the same rights and the same
+powers.
+
+In France, in default of publicity and means of communication,
+the new faith spread slowly enough at first. It was about 1520
+that Luther recruited a few adepts, and only towards 1535 was the
+new belief sufficiently widespread for men to consider it
+necessary to burn its disciples.
+
+In conformity with a well-known psychological law, these
+executions merely favoured the propagation of the Reformation.
+Its first followers included priests and magistrates, but were
+principally obscure artisans. Their conversion was effected
+almost exclusively by mental contagion and suggestion.
+
+As soon as a new belief extends itself, we see grouped round it
+many persons who are indifferent to the belief, but who find in
+it a pretext or opportunity for gratifying their passions or
+their greed. This phenomenon was observed at the time of the
+Reformation in many countries, notably in Germany and in England.
+
+Luther having taught that the clergy had no need of wealth, the
+German lords found many merits in a faith which enabled them to
+seize upon the goods of the Church. Henry VIII. enriched
+himself by a similar operation. Sovereigns who were often
+molested by the Pope could as a rule only look favourably upon a
+doctrine which added religious powers to their political powers
+and made each of them a Pope. Far from diminishing the
+absolutism of rulers, the Reformation only exaggerated it.
+
+
+3. Rational value of the doctrines of the Reformation.
+
+
+The Reformation overturned all Europe, and came near to ruining
+France, of which it made a battle-field for a period of fifty
+years. Never did a cause so insignificant from the rational
+point of view produce such great results.
+
+Here is one of the innumerable proofs of the fact that beliefs
+are propagated independently of all reason. The theological
+doctrines which aroused men's passions so violently, and notably
+those of Calvin, are not even worthy of examination in the light
+of rational logic.
+
+Greatly concerned about his salvation, having an excessive fear
+of the devil, which his confessor was unable to allay, Luther
+sought the surest means of pleasing God that he might avoid Hell.
+
+Having commenced by denying the Pope the right to sell
+indulgences, he presently entirely denied his authority, and that
+of the Church, condemned religious ceremonies, confession, and
+the worship of the saints, and declared that Christians should
+have no rules of conduct other than the Bible. He also
+considered that no one could be saved without the grace of God.
+
+This last theory, known as that of predestination, was in Luther
+rather uncertain, but was stated precisely by Calvin, who made it
+the very foundation of a doctrine to which the majority of
+Protestants are still subservient. According to him: ``From
+all eternity God has predestined certain men to be burned and
+others to be saved.'' Why this monstrous iniquity? Simply
+because ``it is the will of God.''
+
+Thus according to Calvin, who for that matter merely developed
+certain assertions of St. Augustine, an all-powerful God would
+amuse Himself by creating living beings simply in order to burn
+them during all eternity, without paying any heed to their acts
+or merits. It is marvellous that such revolting insanity could
+for such a length of time subjugate so many minds--marvellous
+that it does so still.[1]
+
+
+
+[1] The doctrine of predestination is still taught in Protestant
+catechisms, as is proved by the following passage extracted from
+the last edition of an official catechism for which I sent to
+Edinburgh:
+
+``By the decree of God, for the manifestation of His glory, some
+men and angels are predestinated unto everlasting life, and
+others foreordained to everlasting death.
+
+``These angels and men, thus predestinated and foreordained, are
+particularly and unchangeably designed; and their number is so
+certain and definite that it cannot be either increased or
+diminished.
+
+``Those of mankind that are predestinated unto life, God, before
+the foundation of the world was laid, according to His eternal
+and immutable purpose, and the secret counsel and good pleasure
+of His will, hath chosen in Christ unto everlasting glory, out of
+His mere free grace and love, without any foresight of faith or
+good works, or perseverance in either of them, or any other thing
+in the creature, as conditions, or causes moving him thereunto;
+and all to the praise of his glorious grace.
+
+``As God hath appointed the elect unto glory, so hath He, by the
+eternal and most free purpose of His will, foreordained all the
+means thereunto. Wherefore they who are elected being fallen in
+Adam, are redeemed by Christ; are effectually called unto faith
+in Christ by His spirit working in due season; are justified,
+adopted, sanctified, and kept by His power through faith unto
+salvation. Neither are any other redeemed by Christ, effectually
+called, justified, adopted, sanctified, and saved, but the elect
+only.''
+
+
+
+The psychology of Calvin is not without affinity with that of
+Robespierre. Like the latter, the master of the pure truth, he
+sent to death those who would not accept his doctrines. God, he
+stated, wishes ``that one should put aside all humanity when it
+is a question of striving for his glory.''
+
+The case of Calvin and his disciples shows that matters which
+rationally are the most contradictory become perfectly reconciled
+in minds which are hypnotised by a belief. In the eyes of
+rational logic, it seems impossible to base a morality upon the
+theory of predestination, since whatever they do men are sure of
+being either saved or damned. However, Calvin had no difficulty
+in erecting a most severe morality upon this totally illogical
+basis. Considering themselves the elect of God, his disciples
+were so swollen by pride and the sense of their own dignity that
+they felt obliged to serve as models in their conduct.
+
+
+4. Propagation of the Reformation.
+
+
+The new faith was propagated not by speech, still less by process
+of reasoning, but by the mechanism described in our preceding
+work: that is, by the influence of affirmation, repetition,
+mental contagion, and prestige. At a much later date
+revolutionary ideas were spread over France in the same fashion.
+
+Persecution, as we have already remarked, only favoured this
+propagation. Each execution led to fresh conversions, as was
+seen in the early years of the Christian Church. Anne Dubourg,
+Parliamentary councillor, condemned to be burned alive, marched
+to the stake exhorting the crowd to be converted. ``His
+constancy,'' says a witness, ``made more Protestants among the
+young men of the colleges than the books of Calvin.''
+
+To prevent the condemned from speaking to the people their
+tongues were cut out before they were burned. The horror of
+their sufferings was increased by attaching the victims to an
+iron chain, which enabled the executioners to plunge them into
+the fire and withdraw them several times in succession.
+
+But nothing induced the Protestants to retract, even the offer of
+an amnesty after they had felt the fire.
+
+In 1535 Francis I., forsaking his previous tolerance, ordered six
+fires to be lighted simultaneously in Paris. The Convention, as
+we know, limited itself to a single guillotine in the same city.
+It is probable that the sufferings of the victims were not very
+excruciating; the insensibility of the Christian martyrs had
+already been remarked. Believers are hypnotised by their faith,
+and we know to-day that certain forms of hypnotism engender
+complete insensibility.
+
+The new faith progressed rapidly. In 1560 there were two
+thousand reformed churches in France, and many great lords, at
+first indifferent enough, adhered to the new doctrine.
+
+
+5. Conflict between different religious beliefs--Impossibility
+of Tolerance.
+
+
+I have already stated that intolerance is always an accompaniment
+of powerful religious beliefs. Political and religious
+revolutions furnish us with numerous proofs of this fact, and
+show us also that the mutual intolerance of sectaries of the same
+religion is always much greater than that of the defenders
+of remote and alien faiths, such as Islamism and Christianity.
+In fact, if we consider the faiths for whose sake France was so
+long rent asunder, we shall find that they did not differ on any
+but accessory points. Catholics and Protestants adored exactly
+the same God, and only differed in their manner of adoring Him.
+If reason had played the smallest part in the elaboration of
+their belief, it could easily have proved to them that it must be
+quite indifferent to God whether He sees men adore Him in this
+fashion or in that.
+
+Reason being powerless to affect the brain of the convinced,
+Protestants and Catholics continued their ferocious conflicts.
+All the efforts of their sovereigns to reconcile them were in
+vain. Catherine de Medicis, seeing the party of the Reformed
+Church increasing day by day in spite of persecution, and
+attracting a considerable number of nobles and magistrates,
+thought to disarm them by convoking at Poissy, in 1561, an
+assembly of bishops and pastors with the object of fusing the two
+doctrines. Such an enterprise indicated that the queen, despite
+her subtlety, knew nothing of the laws of mystic logic. Not in
+all history can one cite an example of a belief destroyed or
+reduced by means of refutation. Catherine did not even know that
+although toleration is with difficulty possible between
+individuals, it is impossible between collectivities. Her
+attempt failed completely. The assembled theologians hurled
+texts and insults at one another's heads, but no one was moved.
+Catherine thought to succeed better in 1562 by promulgating an
+edict according Protestants the right to unite in the public
+celebration of their cult.
+
+This tolerance, very admirable from a philosophical point of
+view, but not at all wise from the political standpoint, had no
+other result beyond exasperating both parties. In the Midi,
+where the Protestants were strongest, they persecuted the
+Catholics, sought to convert them by violence, cut their throats
+if they did not succeed, and sacked their cathedrals. In the
+regions where the Catholics were more numerous the Reformers
+suffered like persecutions.
+
+Such hostilities as these inevitably engendered civil war. Thus
+arose the so-called religious wars, which so long spilled the
+blood of France. The cities were ravaged, the inhabitants
+massacred, and the struggle rapidly assumed that special quality
+of ferocity peculiar to religious or political conflicts, which,
+at a later date, was to reappear in the wars of La Vendee.
+
+Old men, women, and children, all were exterminated. A certain
+Baron d'Oppede, first president of the Parliament of Aix, had
+already set an example by killing 3,000 persons in the space of
+ten days, with refinements of cruelty, and destroying three
+cities and twenty-two villages. Montluc, a worthy forerunner of
+Carrier, had the Calvinists thrown living into the wells until
+these were full. The Protestants were no more humane. They did
+not spare even the Catholic churches, and treated the tombs and
+statues just as the delegates of the Convention were to treat the
+royal tombs of Saint Denis.
+
+Under the influence of these conflicts France was progressively
+disintegrated, and at the end of the reign of Henri III. was
+parcelled out into veritable little confederated municipal
+republics, forming so many sovereign states. The royal power was
+vanishing. The States of Blois claimed to dictate their wishes
+to Henri III., who had fled from his capital. In 1577 the
+traveller Lippomano, who traversed France, saw important cities--
+Orleans, Tours, Blois, Poitiers--entirely devastated, the
+cathedrals and churches in ruins, and the tombs shattered. This
+was almost the state of France at the end of the Directory.
+
+Among the events of this epoch, that which has left the darkest
+memory, although it was not perhaps the most murderous, was the
+massacre of St. Bartholomew in 1572, ordered, according to the
+historians, by Catherine de Medicis and Charles IX.
+
+One does not require a very profound knowledge of psychology to
+realise that no sovereign could have ordered such an event. St.
+Bartholomew's Day was not a royal but a popular crime. Catherine
+de Medicis, believing her existence and that of the king
+threatened by a plot directed by four or five Protestant leaders
+then in Paris, sent men to kill them in their houses, according
+to the summary fashion of the time. The massacre which followed
+is very well explained by M. Battifol in the following terms:--
+
+``At the report of what was afoot the rumour immediately ran
+through Paris that the Huguenots were being massacred; Catholic
+gentlemen, soldiers of the guard, archers, men of the people, in
+short all Paris, rushed into the streets, arms in hand, in order
+to participate in the execution, and the general massacre
+commenced, to the sound of ferocious cries of `The
+Huguenots! Kill, kill!' They were struck down, they were
+drowned, they were hanged. All that were known as heretics were
+so served. Two thousand persons were killed in Paris.''
+
+By contagion, the people of the provinces imitated those of
+Paris, and six to eight thousand Protestants were slain.
+
+When time had somewhat cooled religious passions, all the
+historians, even the Catholics, spoke of St. Bartholomew's Day
+with indignation. They thus showed how difficult it is for the
+mentality of one epoch to understand that of another.
+
+Far from being criticised, St. Bartholomew's Day provoked an
+indescribable enthusiasm throughout the whole of Catholic Europe.
+
+Philip II. was delirious with joy when he heard the news, and the
+King of France received more congratulations than if he had won a
+great battle.
+
+But it was Pope Gregory XIII. above all who manifested the
+keenest satisfaction. He had a medal struck to commemorate the
+happy event,[2] ordered joy-fires to be lit and cannon fired,
+celebrated several masses, and sent for the painter Vasari to
+depict on the walls of the Vatican the principal scenes of
+carnage. Further, he sent to the King of France an ambassador
+instructed to felicitate that monarch upon his fine action. It
+is historical details of this kind that enable us to comprehend
+the mind of the believer. The Jacobins of the Terror had a
+mentality very like that of Gregory XIII.
+
+
+
+[2] The medal must have been distributed pretty widely, for the
+cabinet of medals at the Bibliotheque Nationale possesses
+three examples: one in gold, one in silver, and one in copper.
+This medal, reproduced by Bonnani in his Numism. Pontific.
+(vol. i. p. 336), represents on one side Gregory XIII., and on
+the other an angel striking Huguenots with a sword. The exergue
+is Ugonotorum strages, that is, Massacre of the Huguenots.
+(The word strages may be translated by carnage or massacre, a
+sense which it possesses in Cicero and Livy; or again by
+disaster, ruin, a sense attributed to it in Virgil and Tacitus.)
+
+
+
+Naturally the Protestants were not indifferent to such a
+hecatomb, and they made such progress that in 1576 Henri III. was
+reduced to granting them, by the Edict of Beaulieu, entire
+liberty of worship, eight strong places, and, in the Parliaments,
+Chambers composed half of Catholics and half of Huguenots.
+
+These forced concessions did not lead to peace. A Catholic
+League was created, having the Duke of Guise at its head, and the
+conflict continued. But it could not last for ever. We know how
+Henri IV. put an end to it, at least for a time, by his
+abjuration in 1593, and by the Edict of Nantes.
+
+The struggle was quieted but not terminated. Under Louis XIII.
+the Protestants were still restless, and in 1627 Richelieu was
+obliged to besiege La Rochelle, where 15,000 Protestants
+perished. Afterwards, possessing more political than religious
+feeling, the famous Cardinal proved extremely tolerant toward the
+Reformers.
+
+This tolerance could not last. Contrary beliefs cannot come into
+contact without seeking to annihilate each other, as soon as one
+feels capable of dominating the other. Under Louis XIV. the
+Protestants had become by far the weaker, and were forced to
+renounce the struggle and live at peace. Their number was then
+about 1,200,000, and they possessed more than 600 churches,
+served by about 700 pastors. The presence of these
+heretics on French soil was intolerable to the Catholic clergy,
+who endeavoured to persecute them in various ways. As these
+persecutions had little result, Louis XIV. resorted to
+dragonnading them in 1685, when many individuals perished, but
+without further result. Under the pressure of the clergy,
+notably of Bossuett, the Edict of Nantes was revoked, and the
+Protestants were forced to accept conversion or to leave France.
+This disastrous emigration lasted a long time, and is said to
+have cost France 400,000 inhabitants, men of notable energy,
+since they had the courage to listen to their conscience rather
+than their interests.
+
+
+6. The results of Religious Revolutions.
+
+
+If religious revolutions were judged only by the gloomy story of
+the Reformation, we should be forced to regard them as highly
+disastrous. But all have not played a like part, the civilising
+influence of certain among them being considerable.
+
+By giving a people moral unity they greatly increase its material
+power. We see this notably when a new faith, brought by
+Mohammed, transforms the petty and impotent tribes of Arabia into
+a formidable nation.
+
+Such a new religious belief does not merely render a people
+homogeneous. It attains a result that no philosophy, no code
+ever attained: it sensibly transforms what is almost
+unchangeable, the sentiments of a race.
+
+We see this at the period when the most powerful religious
+revolution recorded by history overthrew paganism to substitute a
+God who came from the plains of Galilee. The new ideal demanded
+the renunciation of all the joys of existence in order to
+acquire the eternal happiness of heaven. No doubt such an ideal
+was readily accepted by the poor, the enslaved, the disinherited
+who were deprived of all the joys of life here below, to whom an
+enchanting future was offered in exchange for a life without
+hope. But the austere existence so easily embraced by the poor
+was also embraced by the rich. In this above all was the power
+of the new faith manifested.
+
+Not only did the Christian revolution transform manners: it also
+exercised, for a space of two thousand years, a preponderating
+influence over civilisation. Directly a religious faith triumphs
+all the elements of civilisation naturally adapt themselves to
+it, so that civilisation is rapidly transformed. Writers,
+artists and philosophers merely symbolise, in their works, the
+ideas of the new faith.
+
+When any religious or political faith whatsoever has triumphed,
+not only is reason powerless to affect it, but it even finds
+motives which impel it to interpret and so justify the faith in
+question, and to strive to impose it upon others. There were
+probably as many theologians and orators in the time of Moloch,
+to prove the utility of human sacrifices, as there were at other
+periods to glorify the Inquisition, the massacre of St.
+Bartholomew, and the hecatombs of the Terror.
+
+We must not hope to see peoples possessed by strong beliefs
+readily achieve tolerance. The only people who attained to
+toleration in the ancient world were the polytheists. The
+nations which practise toleration at the present time are those
+that might well be termed polytheistical, since, as in England
+and America, they are divided into innumerable sects.
+Under identical names they really adore very different deities.
+
+The multiplicity of beliefs which results in such toleration
+finally results also in weakness. We therefore come to a
+psychological problem not hitherto resolved: how to possess a
+faith at once powerful and tolerant.
+
+The foregoing brief explanation reveals the large part played by
+religious revolutions and the power of beliefs. Despite their
+slight rational value they shape history, and prevent the peoples
+from remaining a mass of individuals without cohesion or
+strength. Man has needed them at all times to orientate his
+thought and guide his conduct. No philosophy has as yet
+succeeded in replacing them.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER III
+
+THE ACTION OF GOVERNMENTS IN REVOLUTIONS
+
+1. The feeble resistance of Governments in time of Revolution.
+
+Many modern nations--France, Spain, Italy, Austria, Poland,
+Japan, Turkey, Portugal, &c.--have known revolutions within the
+last century. These were usually characterised by their
+instantaneous quality and the facility with which the governments
+attacked were overthrown.
+
+The instantaneous nature of these revolutions is explained by the
+rapidity of mental contagion due to modern methods of publicity.
+The slight resistance of the governments attacked is more
+surprising. It implies a total inability to comprehend and
+foresee created by a blind confidence in their own strength.
+
+The facility with which governments fall is not however a new
+phenomenon. It has been proved more than once, not only in
+autocratic systems, which are always overturned by palace
+conspiracies, but also in governments perfectly instructed in the
+state of public opinion by the press and their own agents.
+
+Among these instantaneous downfalls one of the most striking was
+that which followed the Ordinances of Charles X. This monarch
+was, as we know, overthrown in four days. His minister
+Polignac had taken no measures of defence, and the king was so
+confident of the tranquillity of Paris that he had gone hunting.
+The army was not in the least hostile, as in the reign of Louis
+XVI., but the troops, badly officered, disbanded before the
+attacks of a few insurgents.
+
+The overthrow of Louis-Philippe was still more typical, since it
+did not result from any arbitrary action on the part of the
+sovereign. This monarch was not surrounded by the hatred which
+finally surrounded Charles X., and his fall was the result of an
+insignificant riot which could easily have been repressed.
+
+Historians, who can hardly comprehend how a solidly constituted
+government, supported by an imposing army, can be overthrown by a
+few rioters, naturally attributed the fall of Louis-Philippe to
+deep-seated causes. In reality the incapacity of the generals
+entrusted with his defence was the real cause of his fall.
+
+This case is one of the most instructive that could be cited, and
+is worthy of a moment's consideration. It has been perfectly
+investigated by General Bonnal, in the light of the notes of an
+eye-witness, General Elchingen. Thirty-six thousand troops were
+then in Paris, but the weakness and incapacity of their officers
+made it impossible to use them. Contradictory orders were given,
+and finally the troops were forbidden to fire on the people, who,
+moreover--and nothing could have been more dangerous--were
+permitted to mingle with the troops. The riot succeeded without
+fighting and forced the king to abdicate.
+
+Applying to the preceding case our knowledge of the
+psychology of crowds, General Bonnal shows how easily the riot
+which overthrew Louis-Philippe could have been controlled. He
+proves, notably, that if the commanding officers had not
+completely lost their heads quite a small body of troops could
+have prevented the insurgents from invading the Chamber of
+Deputies. This last, composed of monarchists, would certainly
+have proclaimed the Count of Paris under the regency of his
+mother.
+
+Similar phenomena were observable in the revolutions of Spain and
+Portugal.
+
+These facts show the role of petty accessory circumstances
+in great events, and prove that one must not speak too readily of
+the general laws of history. Without the riot which overthrew
+Louis-Philippe, we should probably have seen neither the Republic
+of 1848, nor the Second Empire, nor Sedan, nor the invasion, nor
+the loss of Alsace.
+
+In the revolutions of which I have just been speaking the army
+was of no assistance to the government, but did not turn against
+it. It sometimes happens otherwise. It is often the army which
+effects the revolution, as in Turkey and Portugal. The
+innumerable revolutions of the Latin republics of America are
+effected by the army.
+
+When a revolution is effected by an army the new rulers naturally
+fall under its domination. I have already recalled the fact that
+this was the case at the end of the Roman Empire, when the
+emperors were made and unmade by the soldiery.
+
+The same thing has sometimes been witnessed in modern times. The
+following extract from a newspaper, with reference to the
+Greek revolution, shows what becomes of a government dominated by
+its army:--
+
+``One day it was announced that eighty officers of the navy would
+send in their resignations if the government did not dismiss the
+leaders of whom they complained. Another time it was the
+agricultural labourers on a farm (metairie) belonging to the
+Crown Prince who demanded the partition of the soil among them.
+The navy protested against the promotion promised to Colonel
+Zorbas. Colonel Zorbas, after a week of discussion with
+Lieutenant Typaldos, treated with the President of the Council as
+one power with another. During this time the Federation of the
+corporations abused the officers of the navy. A deputy demanded
+that these officers and their families should be treated as
+brigands. When Commander Miaoulis fired on the rebels, the
+sailors, who first of all had obeyed Typaldos, returned to duty.
+This is no longer the harmonious Greece of Pericles and
+Themistocles. It is a hideous camp of Agramant.''
+
+A revolution cannot be effected without the assistance or at
+least the neutrality of the army, but it often happens that the
+movement commences without it. This was the case with the
+revolutions of 1830 and 1848, and that of 1870, which overthrew
+the Empire after the humiliation of France by the surrender of
+Sedan.
+
+The majority of revolutions take place in the capitals, and by
+means of contagion spread through the country; but this is not a
+constant rule. We know that during the French Revolution La
+Vendee, Brittany, and the Midi revolted spontaneously against
+Paris.
+
+
+2. How the resistance of Governments may overcome Revolution.
+
+
+In the greater number of the revolutions enumerated above, we
+have seen governments perish by their weakness. As soon as they
+were touched they fell.
+
+The Russian Revolution proved that a government which defends
+itself energetically may finally triumph.
+
+Never was revolution more menacing to the government. After the
+disasters suffered in the Orient, and the severities of a too
+oppressive autocratic regime, all classes of society, including a
+portion of the army and the fleet, had revolted. The railways,
+posts, and telegraph services had struck, so that communications
+between the various portions of the vast empire were interrupted.
+
+The rural class itself, forming the majority of the nation, began
+to feel the influence of the revolutionary propaganda. The lot
+of the peasants was wretched. They were obliged, by the system
+of the mir, to cultivate soil which they could not acquire. The
+government resolved immediately to conciliate this large class of
+peasants by turning them into proprietors. Special laws forced
+the landlords to sell the peasants a portion of their lands, and
+banks intended to lend the buyers the necessary purchase-money
+were created. The sums lent were to be repaid by small annuities
+deducted from the product of the sale of the crops.
+
+Assured of the neutrality of the peasants, the government could
+contend with the fanatics who were burning the towns, throwing
+bombs among the crowds, and waging a merciless warfare. All
+those who could be taken were killed. Such extermination is the
+only method discovered since the beginning of the world by which
+a society can be protected against the rebels who wish to destroy
+it.
+
+The victorious government understood moreover the necessity of
+satisfying the legitimate claims of the enlightened portion of
+the nation. It created a parliament instructed to prepare laws
+and control expenditure.
+
+The history of the Russian Revolution shows us how a government,
+all of whose natural supports have crumbled in succession, can,
+with wisdom and firmness, triumph over the most formidable
+obstacles. It has been very justly said that governments are not
+overthrown, but that they commit suicide.
+
+
+3. Revolutions effected by Governments.--Examples:
+China, Turkey, &c.
+
+
+Governments almost invariably fight revolutions; they hardly ever
+create them. Representing the needs of the moment and general
+opinion, they follow the reformers timidly; they do not precede
+them. Sometimes, however, certain governments have attempted
+those sudden reforms which we know as revolutions. The stability
+or instability of the national mind decrees the success or
+failure of such attempts.
+
+They succeed when the people on whom the government seeks to
+impose new institutions is composed of semi-barbarous tribes,
+without fixed laws, without solid traditions; that is to say,
+without a settled national mind. Such was the condition of
+Russia in the days of Peter the Great. We know how he sought to
+Europeanise the semi-Asiatic populations by means of force.
+
+Japan is another example of a revolution effected by a
+government, but it was her machinery, not her mind that was
+reformed.
+
+It needs a very powerful autocrat, seconded by a man of genius,
+to succeed, even partially, in such a task. More often than not
+the reformer finds that the whole people rises up against him.
+Then, to the contrary of what befalls in an ordinary revolution,
+the autocrat is revolutionary and the people is conservative.
+But an attentive study will soon show you that the peoples are
+always extremely conservative.
+
+Failure is the rule with these attempts. Whether effected by the
+upper classes or the lower, revolutions do not change the souls
+of peoples that have been a long time established. They only
+change those things that are worn by time and ready to fall.
+
+China is at the present time making a very interesting but
+impossible experiment, in seeking, by means of the government,
+suddenly to renew the institutions of the country. The
+revolution which overturned the dynasty of her ancient sovereigns
+was the indirect consequence of the discontent provoked by
+reforms which the government had sought to impose with a view to
+ameliorating the condition of China. The suppression of opium
+and gaming, the reform of the army, and the creation of schools,
+involved an increase of taxation which, as well as the reforms
+themselves, greatly indisposed the general opinion.
+
+A few cultured Chinese educated in the schools of Europe profited
+by this discontent to raise the people and proclaim a republic,
+an institution of which the Chinese could have had no conception.
+
+It surely cannot long survive, for the impulse which has given
+birth to it is not a movement of progress, but of reaction. The
+word republic, to the Chinaman intellectualised by his European
+education, is simply synonymous with the rejection of the yoke of
+laws, rules, and long-established restraints. Cutting off his
+pigtail, covering his head with a cap, and calling himself a
+Republican, the young Chinaman thinks to give the rein to all his
+instincts. This is more or less the idea of a republic that a
+large part of the French people entertained at the time of the
+great Revolution.
+
+China will soon discover the fate that awaits a society deprived
+of the armour slowly wrought by the past. After a few years of
+bloody anarchy it will be necessary to establish a power whose
+tyranny will inevitably be far severer than that which was
+overthrown. Science has not yet discovered the magic ring
+capable of saving a society without discipline. There is no need
+to impose discipline when it has become hereditary, but when the
+primitive instincts have been allowed to destroy the barriers
+painfully erected by slow ancestral labours, they cannot be
+reconstituted save by an energetic tyranny.
+
+As a proof of these assertions we may instance an experiment
+analogous to that undertaken by China; that recently attempted by
+Turkey. A few years ago young men instructed in European schools
+and full of good intentions succeeded, with the aid of a
+number of officers, in overthrowing a Sultan whose tyranny seemed
+insupportable. Having acquired our robust Latin faith in the
+magic power of formulae, they thought they could establish the
+representative system in a country half-civilised, profoundly
+divided by religious hatred, and peopled by divers races.
+
+The attempt has not prospered hitherto. The authors of the
+reformation had to learn that despite their liberalism they were
+forced to govern by methods very like those employed by the
+government overthrown. They could neither prevent summary
+executions nor wholesale massacres of Christians, nor could they
+remedy a single abuse.
+
+It would be unjust to reproach them. What in truth could they
+have done to change a people whose traditions have been fixed so
+long, whose religious passions are so intense, and whose
+Mohammedans, although in the minority, legitimately claim to
+govern the sacred city of their faith according to their code?
+How prevent Islam from remaining the State religion in a country
+where civil law and religious law are not yet plainly separated,
+and where faith in the Koran is the only tie by which the idea of
+nationality can be maintained?
+
+It was difficult to destroy such a state of affairs, so that we
+were bound to see the re-establishment of an autocratic
+organisation with an appearance of constitutionalism--that is to
+say, practically the old system once again. Such attempts afford
+a good example of the fact that a people cannot choose its
+institutions until it has transformed its mind.
+
+
+4. Social elements which survive the changes of Government after
+Revolution.
+
+
+What we shall say later on as to the stable foundation of the
+national soul will enable us to appreciate the force of systems
+of government that have been long established, such as ancient
+monarchies. A monarch may easily be overthrown by conspirators,
+but these latter are powerless against the principles which the
+monarch represents. Napoleon at his fall was replaced not by his
+natural heir, but by the heir of kings. The latter incarnated an
+ancient principle, while the son of the Emperor personified ideas
+that were as yet imperfectly established in men's minds.
+
+For the same reason a minister, however able, however great the
+services he has rendered to his country, can very rarely
+overthrow his Sovereign. Bismarck himself could not have done
+so. This great minister had single-handed created the unity of
+Germany, yet his master had only to touch him with his finger and
+he vanished. A man is as nothing before a principle supported by
+opinion.
+
+But even when, for various reasons, the principle incarnated by a
+government is annihilated with that government, as happened at
+the time of the French Revolution, all the elements of social
+organisation do not perish at the same time.
+
+If we knew nothing of France but the disturbances of the last
+hundred years and more we might suppose the country to live in a
+state of profound anarchy. Now her economic, industrial, and
+even her political life manifests, on the contrary, a continuity
+that seems to be independent of all revolutions and governments.
+
+The fact is that beside the great events of which history treats
+are the little facts of daily life which the books neglect to
+tell. They are ruled by imperious necessities which halt for no
+man. Their total mass forms the real framework of the life of
+the people.
+
+While the study of great events shows us that the nominal
+government of France has been frequently changed in the space of
+a century, an examination of the little daily events will prove,
+on the contrary, that her real government has been little
+altered.
+
+Who in truth are the real rulers of a people? Kings and
+ministers, no doubt, in the great crises of national life, but
+they play no part whatever in the little realities which make up
+the life of every day. The real directing forces of a country
+are the administrations, composed of impersonal elements which
+are never affected by the changes of government. Conservative of
+traditions, they are anonymous and lasting, and constitute an
+occult power before which all others must eventually bow. Their
+action has even increased to such a degree that, as we shall
+presently show, there is a danger that they may form an anonymous
+State more powerful than the official State. France has thus
+come to be governed by heads of departments and government
+clerks. The more we study the history of revolutions the more we
+discover that they change practically nothing but the label. To
+create a revolution is easy, but to change the soul of a people
+is difficult indeed.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER IV
+
+THE PART PLAYED BY THE PEOPLE IN REVOLUTIONS
+
+1. The stability and malleability of the national mind.
+
+The knowledge of a people at any given moment of its history
+involves an understanding of its environment and above all of its
+past. Theoretically one may deny that past, as did the men of
+the Revolution, as many men of the present day have done, but its
+influence remains indestructible.
+
+In the past, built up by slow accumulations of centuries, was
+formed the aggregation of thoughts, sentiments, traditions, and
+prejudices constituting the national mind which makes the
+strength of a race. Without it no progress is possible. Each
+generation would necessitate a fresh beginning.
+
+The aggregate composing the soul of a people is solidly
+established only if it possesses a certain rigidity, but this
+rigidity must not pass a certain limit, or there would be no such
+thing as malleability.
+
+Without rigidity the ancestral soul would have no fixity, and
+without malleability it could not adapt itself to the changes of
+environment resulting from the progress of civilization.
+
+Excessive malleability of the national mind impels a people to
+incessant revolutions. Excess of rigidity leads it to
+decadence. Living species, like the races of humanity, disappear
+when, too fixedly established by a long past, they become
+incapable of adapting themselves to new conditions of existence.
+
+Few peoples have succeeded in effecting a just equilibrium
+between these two contrary qualities of stability and
+malleability. The Romans in antiquity and the English in modern
+times may be cited among those who have best attained it.
+
+The peoples whose mind is most fixed and established often effect
+the most violent revolutions. Not having succeeded in evolving
+progressively, in adapting themselves to changes of environment,
+they are forced to adapt themselves violently when such
+adaptation becomes indispensable.
+
+Stability is only acquired very slowly. The history of a race is
+above all the story of its long efforts to establish its mind.
+So long as it has not succeeded it forms a horde of barbarians
+without cohesion and strength. After the invasions of the end of
+the Roman Empire France took several centuries to form a national
+soul.
+
+She finally achieved one; but in the course of centuries this
+soul finally became too rigid. With a little more malleability,
+the ancient monarchy would have been slowly transformed as it was
+elsewhere, and we should have avoided, together with the
+Revolution and its consequences, the heavy task of remaking a
+national soul.
+
+The preceding considerations show us the part of race in the
+genesis of revolutions, and explain why the same revolutions will
+produce such different effects in different countries; why, for
+example, the ideas of the French Revolution, welcomed with
+such enthusiasm by some peoples, were rejected by others.
+
+Certainly England, although a very stable country, has suffered
+two revolutions and slain a king; but the mould of her mental
+armour was at once stable enough to retain the acquisitions of
+the past and malleable enough to modify them only within the
+necessary limits. Never did England dream, as did the men of the
+French Revolution, of destroying the ancestral heritage in order
+to erect a new society in the name of reason.
+
+``While the Frenchman,'' writes M. A. Sorel, ``despised his
+government, detested his clergy, hated the nobility, and revolted
+against the laws, the Englishman was proud of his religion, his
+constitution, his aristocracy, his House of Lords. These were
+like so many towers of the formidable Bastille in which he
+entrenched himself, under the British standard, to judge Europe
+and cover her with contempt. He admitted that the command was
+disputed inside the fort, but no stranger must approach.''
+
+The influence of race in the destiny of the peoples appears
+plainly in the history of the perpetual revolutions of the
+Spanish republics of South America. Composed of half-castes,
+that is to say, of individuals whose diverse heredities have
+dissociated their ancestral characteristics, these populations
+have no national soul and therefore no stability. A people of
+half-castes is always ungovernable.
+
+If we would learn more of the differences of political capacity
+which the racial factor creates we must examine the same nation
+as governed by two races successively.
+
+The event is not rare in history. It has been manifested in a
+striking manner of late in Cuba and the Philippines, which passed
+suddenly from the rule of Spain to that of the United States.
+
+We know in what anarchy and poverty Cuba existed under Spanish
+rule; we know, too, to what a degree of prosperity the island was
+brought in a few years when it fell into the hands of the United
+States.
+
+The same experience was repeated in the Philippines, which for
+centuries had been governed by Spain. Finally the country was no
+more than a vast jungle, the home of epidemics of every kind,
+where a miserable population vegetated without commerce or
+industry. After a few years of American rule the country was
+entirely transformed: malaria, yellow fever, plague and cholera
+had entirely disappeared. The swamps were drained; the country
+was covered with railways, factories and schools. In thirteen
+years the mortality was reduced by two-thirds.
+
+It is to such examples that we must refer the theorist who has
+not yet grasped the profound significance of the word race, and
+how far the ancestral soul of a people rules over its destiny.
+
+
+2. How the people regards Revolution.
+
+
+The part of the people has been the same in all revolutions. It
+is never the people that conceives them nor directs them. Its
+activity is released by means of leaders.
+
+Only when the direct interests of the people are involved do we
+see, as recently in Champagne, any fraction of the people rising
+spontaneously. A movement thus localised constitutes a mere
+riot.
+
+Revolution is easy when the leaders are very influential. Of
+this Portugal and Brazil have recently furnished proofs. But new
+ideas penetrate the people very slowly indeed. Generally it
+accepts a revolution without knowing why, and when by chance it
+does succeed in understanding why, the revolution is over long
+ago.
+
+The people will create a revolution because it is persuaded to do
+so, but it does not understand very much of the ideas of its
+leaders; it interprets them in its own fashion, and this fashion
+is by no means that of the true authors of the revolution. The
+French Revolution furnished a striking example of this fact.
+
+The Revolution of 1789 had as its real object the substitution of
+the power of the nobility by that of the bourgeoisie; that is,
+an old elite which had become incapable was to be replaced
+by a new elite which did possess capacity.
+
+There was little question of the people in this first phase of
+the Revolution. The sovereignty of the people was proclaimed,
+but it amounted only to the right of electing its
+representatives.
+
+Extremely illiterate, not hoping, like the middle classes, to
+ascend the social scale, not in any way feeling itself the equal
+of the nobles, and not aspiring ever to become their equal, the
+people had views and interests very different to those of the
+upper classes of society.
+
+The struggles of the assembly with the royal power led it to call
+for the intervention of the people in these struggles. It
+intervened more and more, and the bourgeois revolution rapidly
+became a popular revolution.
+
+An idea having no force of its own, and acting only by virtue of
+possessing an affective and mystic substratum which supports it,
+the theoretical ideas of the bourgeoisie, before they could act
+on the people, had to be transformed into a new and very definite
+faith, springing from obvious practical interests.
+
+This transformation was rapidly effected when the people heard
+the men envisaged by it as the Government assuring it that it was
+the equal of its former masters. It began to regard itself as a
+victim, and proceeded to pillage, burn, and massacre, imagining
+that in so doing it was exercising a right.
+
+The great strength of the revolutionary principles was that they
+gave a free course to the instincts of primitive barbarity which
+had been restrained by the secular and inhibitory action of
+environment, tradition, and law.
+
+All the social bonds that formerly contained the multitude were
+day by day dissolving, so that it conceived a notion of unlimited
+power, and the joy of seeing its ancient masters ferreted out and
+despoiled. Having become the sovereign people, were not all
+things permissible to it?
+
+The motto of Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, a true manifestation
+of hope and faith at the beginning of the Revolution, soon merely
+served to cover a legal justification of the sentiments of
+jealousy, cupidity, and hatred of superiors, the true motives of
+crowds unrestrained by discipline. This is why the Revolution so
+soon ended in disorder, violence, and anarchy.
+
+From the moment when the Revolution descended from the middle to
+the lower classes of society, it ceased to be a domination of the
+instinctive by the rational, and became, on the contrary,
+the effort of the instinctive to overpower the rational.
+
+This legal triumph of the atavistic instincts was terrible. The
+whole effort of societies an effort indispensable to their
+continued existence--had always been to restrain, thanks to the
+power of tradition, customs, and codes, certain natural instincts
+which man has inherited from his primitive animality. It is
+possible to dominate them--and the more a people does overcome
+them the more civilised it is--but they cannot be destroyed. The
+influence of various exciting causes will readily result in their
+reappearance.
+
+This is why the liberation of popular passions is so dangerous.
+The torrent, once escaped from its bed, does not return until it
+has spread devastation far and wide. ``Woe to him who stirs up
+the dregs of a nation,'' said Rivarol at the beginning of the
+Revolution. ``There is no age of enlightenment for the
+populace.''
+
+
+3. The supposed Part of the People during Revolution.
+
+
+The laws of the psychology of crowds show us that the people
+never acts without leaders, and that although it plays a
+considerable part in revolutions by following and exaggerating
+the impulses received, it never directs its own movements.
+
+In all political revolutions we discover the action of leaders.
+They do not create the ideas which serve as the basis of
+revolutions, but they utilise them as a means of action. Ideas,
+leaders, armies, and crowds constitute four elements which all
+have their part to play in revolutions.
+
+The crowd, roused by the leaders, acts especially by means of its
+mass. Its action is comparable to that of the shell which
+perforates an armour-plate by the momentum of a force it did not
+create. Rarely does the crowd understand anything of the
+revolutions accomplished with its assistance. It obediently
+follows its leaders without even trying to find out what they
+want. It overthrew Charles X. because of his Ordinances without
+having any idea of the contents of the latter, and would have
+been greatly embarrassed had it been asked at a later date why it
+overthrew Louis-Philippe.
+
+Deceived by appearances, many authors, from Michelet to Aulard,
+have supposed that the people effected our great Revolution.
+
+``The principal actor,'' said Michelet, ``is the people.''
+
+``It is an error to say,'' writes M. Aulard, ``that the French
+Revolution was effected by a few distinguished people or a few
+heroes. . . . I believe that in the whole history of the period
+included between 1789 and 1799 not a single person stands out who
+led or shaped events: neither Louis XVI. nor Mirabeau nor Danton
+nor Robespierre. Must we say that it was the French people that
+was the real hero of the French Revolution? Yes--provided we see
+the French people not as a multitude but as a number of organised
+groups.''
+
+And in a recent work M. A. Cochin insists on this conception of
+popular action.
+
+``And here is the wonder: Michelet is right. In proportion as
+we know them better the facts seem to consecrate the fiction:
+this crowd, without chiefs and without laws, the very image of
+chaos, did for five years govern and command, speak and act, with
+a precision, a consistency, and an entirety that were
+marvellous. Anarchy gave lessons in order and discipline to the
+defeated party of order . . . twenty-five millions of men, spread
+over an area of 30,000 square leagues, acted as one.''
+
+Certainly if this simultaneous conduct of the people had been
+spontaneous, as the author supposes, it would have been
+marvellous. M. Aulard himself understands very well the
+impossibilities of such a phenomenon, for he is careful, in
+speaking of the people, to say that he is speaking of groups, and
+that these groups may have been guided by leaders:--
+
+``And what, then, cemented the national unity? Who saved this
+nation, attacked by the king and rent by civil war? Was it
+Danton? Was it Robespierre? Was it Carnot? Certainly these
+individual men were of service: but unity was in fact maintained
+and independence assured by the grouping of the French into
+communes and popular societies--people's clubs. It was the
+municipal and Jacobin organisation of France that forced the
+coalition of Europe to retreat. But in each group, if we look
+more closely, there were two or three individuals more capable
+than the rest, who, whether leaders or led, executed decisions
+and had the appearance of leaders, but who (if, for instance, we
+read the proceedings of the people's clubs) seem to us to have
+drawn their strength far more from their group than from
+themselves.
+
+M. Aulard's mistake consists in supposing that all these groups
+were derived ``from a spontaneous movement of fraternity and
+reason.'' France at that time was covered with thousands of
+little clubs, receiving a single impulsion from the great
+Jacobin Club of Paris, and obeying it with perfect docility.
+This is what reality teaches us, though the illusions of the
+Jacobins do not permit them to accept the fact.[3]
+
+
+
+[3] In the historical manuals which M. Aulard has prepared for
+the use of classes in collaboration with M. Debidour the
+role attributed to the people as an entity is even more
+marked. We see it intervening continually and spontaneously;
+here are a few examples:--
+
+The ``Day'' of June the 20th: ``The king dismissed the
+Girondist members. The people of Paris, indignant, rose
+spontaneously and invaded the Tuileries.''
+
+The ``Day'' of August 10th: ``The Legislative Assembly dared
+not overthrow it; it was the people of Paris, aided by the
+Federals of the Departments, who effected this revolution at the
+price of its blood.''
+
+The conflict of the Girondists and the Mountain: ``This
+discord in the face of the enemy was dangerous. The people put
+an end to it on the days of the 31st of May and the 2nd of June,
+1793, when it forced the Convention to expel the leaders of the
+Gironde from its midst and to decree their arrest.''
+
+
+
+4. The Popular Entity and its Constituent Elements.
+
+
+In order to answer to certain theoretical conceptions the people
+was erected into a mystic entity, endowed with all the powers and
+all the virtues, incessantly praised by the politicians, and
+overwhelmed with flattery. We shall see what we are to make of
+this conception of the part played by the people in the French
+Revolution.
+
+To the Jacobins of this epoch, as to those of our own days, this
+popular entity constitutes a superior personality possessing the
+attributes, peculiar to divinities, of never having to answer for
+its actions and never making a mistake. Its wishes must be
+humbly acceded. The people may kill, burn, ravage, commit the
+most frightful cruelties, glorify its hero to-day and throw him
+into the gutter to-morrow; it is all one; the politicians will
+not cease to vaunt its virtues, its high wisdom, and to bow to
+its every decision.[4]
+
+
+
+[4] These pretensions do at least seem to be growing untenable to
+the more advanced republicans.
+
+``The rage with the socialists'' writes M. Clemenceau, ``is to
+endow with all the virtues, as though by a superhuman reason, the
+crowd whose reason cannot be much to boast of.'' The famous
+statesman might say more correctly that reason not only cannot be
+prominent in the crowd but is practically nonexistent.
+
+
+
+
+Now in what does this entity really consist, this mysterious
+fetich which revolutionists have revered for more than a century?
+
+It may be decomposed into two distinct categories. The first
+includes the peasants, traders, and workers of all sorts who need
+tranquillity and order that they may exercise their calling.
+This people forms the majority, but a majority which never caused
+a revolution. Living in laborious silence, it is ignored by the
+historians.
+
+The second category, which plays a capital part in all national
+disturbances, consists of a subversive social residue dominated
+by a criminal mentality. Degenerates of alcoholism and poverty,
+thieves, beggars, destitute ``casuals,'' indifferent workers
+without employment--these constitute the dangerous bulk of the
+armies of insurrection.
+
+The fear of punishment prevents many of them from becoming
+criminals at ordinary times, but they do become criminals as soon
+as they can exercise their evil instincts without danger.
+
+To this sinister substratum are due the massacres which stain all
+revolutions.
+
+It was this class which, guided by its leaders, continually
+invaded the great revolutionary Assemblies. These regiments of
+disorder had no other ideal than that of massacre, pillage, and
+incendiarism. Their indifference to theories and principles was
+complete.
+
+To the elements recruited from the lowest dregs of the populace
+are added, by way of contagion, a host of idle and indifferent
+persons who are simply drawn into the movement. They shout
+because there are men shouting, and revolt because there is a
+revolt, without having the vaguest idea of the cause of shouting
+or revolution. The suggestive power of their environment
+absolutely hypnotises them, and impels them to action.
+
+These noisy and maleficent crowds, the kernel of all
+insurrections, from antiquity to our own times, are the only
+crowds known to the orator. To the orator they are the sovereign
+people. As a matter of fact this sovereign people is principally
+composed of the lower populace of whom Thiers said:--
+
+``Since the time when Tacitus saw it applaud the crimes of the
+emperors the vile populace has not changed. These barbarians who
+swarm at the bottom of societies are always ready to stain the
+people with every crime, at the beck of every power, and to the
+dishonour of every cause.''
+
+At no period of history was the role of the lowest elements
+of the population exercised in such a lasting fashion as in the
+French Revolution.
+
+The massacres began as soon as the beast was unchained--that is,
+from 1789, long before the Convention. They were carried
+out with all possible refinements of cruelty. During the killing
+of September the prisoners were slowly chopped to bits by sabre-
+cuts in order to prolong their agonies and amuse the spectators,
+who experienced the greatest delight before the spectacle of the
+convulsions of the victims and their shrieks of agony.
+
+Similar scenes were observed all over France, even in the early
+days of the Revolution, although the foreign war did not excuse
+them then, nor any other pretext.
+
+From March to September a whole series of burnings, killings, and
+pillagings drenched all France in blood. Taine cites one hundred
+and twenty such cases. Rouen, Lyons, Strasbourg, &c., fell into
+the power of the populace.
+
+The Mayor of Troyes, his eyes destroyed by blows of scissors, was
+murdered after hours of suffering. The Colonel of Dragoons
+Belzuce was cut to pieces while living. In many places the
+hearts of the victims were torn out and carried about the cities
+on the point of a pike.
+
+Such is the behaviour of the base populace so soon as imprudent
+hands have broken the network of constraints which binds its
+ancestral savagery. It meets with every indulgence because it is
+in the interests of the politicians to flatter it. But let us
+for a moment suppose the thousands of beings who constitute it
+condensed into one single being. The personality thus formed
+would appear as a cruel and narrow and abominable monster, more
+horrible than the bloodiest tyrants of history.
+
+This impulsive and ferocious people has always been easily
+dominated so soon as a strong power has opposed it. If its
+violence is unlimited, so is its servility. All the despotisms
+have had it for their servant. The Caesars are certain of
+being acclaimed by it, whether they are named Caligula, Nero,
+Marat, Robespierre, or Boulanger.
+
+Beside these destructive hordes whose action during revolution is
+capital, there exists, as we have already remarked, the mass of
+the true people, which asks only the right to labour. It
+sometimes benefits by revolutions, but never causes them. The
+revolutionary theorists know little of it and distrust it, aware
+of its traditional and conservative basis. The resistant nucleus
+of a country, it makes the strength and continuity of the latter.
+
+Extremely docile through fear, easily influenced by its leaders,
+it will momentarily commit every excess while under their
+influence, but the ancestral inertia of the race will soon take
+charge again, which is the reason why it so quickly tires of
+revolution. Its traditional soul quickly incites it to oppose
+itself to anarchy when the latter goes too far. At such times it
+seeks the leader who will restore order.
+
+This people, resigned and peaceable, has evidently no very lofty
+nor complicated political conceptions. Its governmental ideal is
+always very simple, is something very like dictatorship. This is
+why, from the times of the Greeks to our own, dictatorship has
+always followed anarchy. It followed it after the first
+Revolution, when Bonaparte was acclaimed, and again when, despite
+opposition, four successive plebiscites raised Louis Napoleon to
+the head of the republic, ratified his coup d'etat,
+re-established the Empire, and in 1870, before the war, approved
+of his rule.
+
+Doubtless in these last instances the people was deceived. But
+without the revolutionary conspiracies which led to disorder, it
+would not have been impelled to seek the means of escape
+therefrom.
+
+The facts recalled in this chapter must not be forgotten if we
+wish fully to comprehend the various roles of the people
+during revolution. Its action is considerable, but very unlike
+that imagined by the legends whose repetition alone constitutes
+their vitality.
+
+
+
+BOOK II
+
+THE FORMS OF MENTALITY PREVALENT DURING REVOLUTION
+
+CHAPTER I
+
+INDIVIDUAL VARIATIONS OF CHARACTER IN TIME OF REVOLUTION
+
+1. Transformations of Personality.
+
+I have dwelt at length elsewhere upon a certain theory of
+character, without which it is absolutely impossible to
+understand divers transformations or inconsistencies of conduct
+which occur at certain moments, notably in time of revolution.
+Here are the principal points of this theory:
+
+Every individual possesses, besides his habitual mentality,
+which, when the environment does not alter, is almost constant,
+various possibilities of character which may be evoked by passing
+events.
+
+The people who surround us are the creatures of certain
+circumstances, but not of all circumstances. Our ego consists of
+the association of innumerable cellular egos, the residues of
+ancestral personalities. By their combination they form an
+equilibrium which is fairly permanent when the social environment
+does not vary. As soon as this environment is considerably
+modified, as in time of insurrection, this equilibrium is broken,
+and the dissociated elements constitute, by a fresh aggregation,
+a new personality, which is manifested by ideas, feelings, and
+actions very different from those formerly observed in the same
+individual. Thus it is that during the Terror we see honest
+bourgeois and peaceful magistrates who were noted for their
+kindness turned into bloodthirsty fanatics.
+
+Under the influence of environment the old personality may
+therefore give place to one entirely new. For this reason the
+actors in great religious and political crises often seem of a
+different essence to ourselves; yet they do not differ from us;
+the repetition of the same events would bring back the same men.
+
+Napoleon perfectly understood these possibilities of character
+when he said, in Saint Helena:--
+
+``It is because I know just how great a part chance plays in our
+political decisions, that I have always been without prejudices,
+and very indulgent as to the part men have taken during our
+disturbances. . . . In time of revolution one can only say what
+one has done; it would not be wise to say that one could not have
+done otherwise. . . . Men are difficult to understand if we want
+to be just. . . . Do they know themselves? Do they account for
+themselves very clearly? There are virtues and vices of
+circumstance.''
+
+When the normal personality has been disaggregated under the
+influence of certain events, how does the new personality form
+itself? By several means, the most active of which is the
+acquisition of a strong belief. This orientates all the elements
+of the understanding, as the magnet collects into regular
+curves the filings of a magnetic metal.
+
+Thus were formed the personalities observed in times of great
+crises: the Crusades, the Reformation, the Revolution notably.
+
+At normal times the environment varies little, so that as a rule
+we see only a single personality in the individuals that surround
+us. Sometimes, however, it happens that we observe several,
+which in certain circumstances may replace one another.
+
+These personalities may be contradictory and even inimical. This
+phenomenon, exceptional under normal conditions, is considerably
+accentuated in certain pathological conditions. Morbid
+psychology has recorded several examples of multiple personality
+in a single subject, such as the cases cited by Morton Prince and
+Pierre Janet.
+
+In all these variations of personality it is not the intelligence
+which is modified, but the feelings, whose association forms the
+character.
+
+
+2. Elements of Character Predominant in Time of Revolution.
+
+
+During revolution we see several sentiments developed which are
+commonly repressed, but to which the destruction of social
+constraints gives a free vent.
+
+These constraints, consisting of the law, morality, and
+tradition, are not always completely broken. Some survive the
+upheaval and serve to some extent to damp the explosion of
+dangerous sentiments.
+
+The most powerful of these restraints is the soul of the race.
+This determines a manner of seeing, feeling, and willing
+common to the majority of the individuals of the same people; it
+constitutes a hereditary custom, and nothing is more powerful
+than the ties of custom.
+
+This racial influence limits the variations of a people and
+determines its destiny within certain limits in spite of all
+superficial changes.
+
+For example, to take only the instances of history, it would seem
+that the mentality of France must have varied enormously during a
+single century. In a few years it passed from the Revolution to
+Caesarism, returned to the monarchy, effected another
+Revolution, and then summoned a new Caesar. In reality only
+the outsides of things had changed.
+
+We cannot insist further here on the limits of national
+variability, but must now consider the influence of certain
+affective elements, whose development during revolution
+contributes to modify individual or collective personalities. In
+particular I will mention hatred, fear, ambition, jealousy or
+envy, vanity, and enthusiasm. We observe their influence during
+several of the upheavals of history, notably during the course of
+the French Revolution, which will furnish us with most of our
+examples.
+
+Hatred.--The hatred of persons, institutions, and things which
+animated the men of the Revolution is one of these affective
+phenomena which are the more striking the more one studies their
+psychology. They detested, not only their enemies, but the
+members of their own party. ``If one were to accept
+unreservedly,'' said a recent writer, ``the judgments which they
+expressed of one another, we should have to conclude that they
+were all traitors and boasters, all incapable and corrupt,
+all assassins or tyrants.'' We know with what hatred, scarcely
+appeased by the death of their enemies, men persecuted the
+Girondists, Dantonists, Hebertists, Robespierrists, &c.
+
+One of the chief causes of this feeling resided in the fact that
+these furious sectaries, being apostles in possession of the
+absolute verity, were unable, like all believers, to tolerate the
+sight of infidels. A mystic or sentimental certitude is always
+accompanied by the need of forcing itself on others, is never
+convinced, and does not shrink from wholesale slaughter when it
+has the power to commit it.
+
+If the hatreds that divided the men of the Revolution had been of
+rational origin they would not have lasted long, but, arising
+from affective and mystic factors, men could neither forget nor
+forgive. Their sources being identical in the different parties,
+they manifested themselves on every hand with identical violence.
+
+It has been proved, by means of documents, that the Girondists
+were no less sanguinary than the Montagnards. They were the
+first to declare, with Petion, that the vanquished parties
+should perish. They also, according to M. Aulard, attempted to
+justify the massacres of September. The Terror must not be
+considered simply as a means of defence, but as the general
+process of destruction to which triumphant believers have always
+treated their detested enemies. Men who can put up with the
+greatest divergence of ideas cannot tolerate differences of
+belief.
+
+In religious or political warfare the vanquished can hope for no
+quarter. From Sulla, who cut the throats of two hundred senators
+and five or six thousand Romans, to the men who suppressed the
+Commune, and shot down more than twenty thousand after
+their victory, this bloody law has never failed. Proved over and
+over again in the past, it will doubtless be so in the future.
+
+The hatreds of the Revolution did not arise entirely from
+divergence of belief. Other sentiments--envy, ambition, and
+self-love--also engendered them. The rivalry of individuals
+aspiring to power led the chiefs of the various groups in
+succession to the scaffold.
+
+We must remember, moreover, that the need of division and the
+hatred resulting therefrom seem to be constituent elements of the
+Latin mind. They cost our Gaulish ancestors their independence,
+and had already struck Caesar.
+
+``No city,'' he said, ``but was divided into two factions; no
+canton, no village, no house in which the spirit of party did not
+breathe. It was very rarely that a year went by without a city
+taking up arms to attack or repulse its neighbours.''
+
+As man has only recently entered upon the age of knowledge, and
+has always hitherto been guided by sentiments and beliefs, we may
+conceive the vast importance of hatred as a factor of his
+history.
+
+Commandant Colin, professor at the College of War, remarks in the
+following terms on the importance of this feeling during certain
+wars:--
+
+``In war more than at any other time there is no better inspiring
+force than hatred; it was hatred that made Blucher victorious
+over Napoleon. Analyse the most wonderful manoeuvres, the most
+decisive operations, and if they are not the work of an
+exceptional man, a Frederick or a Napoleon, you will find they
+are inspired by passion more than by calculation. What
+would the war of 1870 have been without the hatred which we bore
+the Germans?''
+
+The writer might have added that the intense hatred of the
+Japanese for the Russians, who had so humiliated them, might be
+classed among the causes of their success. The Russian soldiers,
+ignorant of the very existence of the Japanese, had no animosity
+against them, which was one of the reasons of their failure.
+
+There was assuredly a good deal of talk of fraternity at the time
+of the Revolution, and there is even more to-day. Pacificism,
+humanitarianism, and solidarity have become catchwords of the
+advanced parties, but we know how profound are the hatreds
+concealed beneath these terms, and what dangers overhang our
+modern society.
+
+Fear.--Fear plays almost as large a part in revolutions as
+hatred. During the French Revolution there were many examples of
+great individual courage and many exhibitions of collective
+cowardice.
+
+Facing the scaffold, the men of the Convention were always brave
+in the extreme; but before the threats of the rioters who invaded
+the Assembly they constantly exhibited an excessive
+pusillanimity, obeying the most absurd injunctions, as we shall
+see if we re-read the history of the revolutionary Assemblies.
+
+All the forms of fear were observed at this period. One of the
+most widespread was the fear of appearing moderate. Members of
+the Assemblies, public prosecutors, representatives ``on
+mission,'' judges of the revolutionary tribunals, &c., all sought
+to appear more advanced than their rivals. Fear was one of the
+principal elements of the crimes committed at this period.
+If by some miracle it could have been eliminated from the
+revolutionary Assemblies, their conduct would have been quite
+other than it was, and the Revolution itself would have taken a
+very different direction.
+
+Ambition, Envy, Vanity, &c.--In normal times the influence of
+these various affective elements is forcibly contained by social
+necessities. Ambition, for instance, is necessarily limited in a
+hierarchical form of society. Although the soldier does
+sometimes become a general, it is only after a long term of
+service. In time of revolution, on the other hand, there is no
+need to wait. Every one may reach the upper ranks almost
+immediately, so that all ambitions are violently aroused. The
+humblest man believes himself fitted for the highest employments,
+and by this very fact his vanity grows out of all measure.
+
+All the passions being more or less aroused, including ambition
+and vanity, we see the development of jealousy and envy of those
+who have succeeded more quickly than others.
+
+The effect of jealousy, always important in times of revolution,
+was especially so during the great French Revolution. Jealousy
+of the nobility constituted one of its most important factors.
+The middle classes had increased in capacity and wealth, to the
+point of surpassing the nobility. Although they mingled with the
+nobles more and more, they felt, none the less, that they were
+held at a distance, and this they keenly resented. This frame of
+mind had unconsciously made the bourgeoisie keen supporters of
+the philosophic doctrine of equality.
+
+Wounded self-love and jealousy were thus the causes of
+hatreds that we can scarcely conceive today, when the social
+influence of the nobility is so small. Many members of the
+Convention--Carrier, Marat, and others--remembered with anger
+that they had once occupied subordinate positions in the
+establishments of great nobles. Mme. Roland was never able to
+forget that, when she and her mother were invited to the house of
+a great lady under the ancien regime, they had been sent to
+dine in the servants' quarters.
+
+The philosopher Rivarol has very well described in the following
+passage, already cited by Taine, the influence of wounded self-
+love and jealousy upon the revolutionary hatreds:--
+
+``It is not,'' he writes, ``the taxes, nor the lettres de
+cachet, nor any of the other abuses of authority; it is not the
+sins of the intendants, nor the long and ruinous delays of
+justice, that has most angered the nation; it is the prejudices
+of the nobility for which it has exhibited the greatest hatred.
+What proves this clearly is the fact that it is the bourgeois,
+the men of letters, the men of money, in fact all those who are
+jealous of the nobility, who have raised the poorer inhabitants
+of the cities against them, and the peasants in the country
+districts.''
+
+This very true statement partly justifies the saying of Napoleon:
+
+``Vanity made the Revolution; liberty was only the pretext.''
+
+Enthusiasm.--The enthusiasm of the founders of the Revolution
+equalled that of the apostles of the faith of Mohammed. And it
+was really a religion that the bourgeois of the first Assembly
+thought to found. They thought to have destroyed an old
+world, and to have built a new one upon its ruins. Never
+did illusion more seductive fire the hearts of men. Equality and
+fraternity, proclaimed by the new dogmas, were to bring the reign
+of eternal happiness to all the peoples. Man had broken for ever
+with a past of barbarity and darkness. The regenerated world
+would in future be illuminated by the lucid radiance of pure
+reason. On all hands the most brilliant oratorical formulae
+saluted the expected dawn.
+
+That this enthusiasm was so soon replaced by violence was due to
+the fact that the awakening was speedy and terrible. One can
+readily conceive the indignant fury with which the apostles of
+the Revolution attacked the daily obstacles opposed to the
+realisation of their dreams. They had sought to reject the past,
+to forget tradition, to make man over again. But the past
+reappeared incessantly, and men refused to change. The
+reformers, checked in their onward march, would not give in.
+They sought to impose by force a dictatorship which speedily made
+men regret the system abolished, and finally led to its return.
+
+It is to be remarked that although the enthusiasm of the first
+days did not last in the revolutionary Assemblies, it survived
+very much longer in the armies, and constituted their chief
+strength. To tell the truth, the armies of the Revolution were
+republican long before France became so, and remained republican
+long after France had ceased to be so.
+
+The variations of character considered in this chapter, being
+conditioned by certain common aspirations and identical changes
+of environment, finally became concrete in a small number
+of fairly homogeneous mentalities. Speaking only of the more
+characteristic, we may refer them to four types: the Jacobin,
+mystic, revolutionary, and criminal mentalities.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER II
+
+THE MYSTIC MENTALITY AND THE JACOBIN MENTALITY
+
+1. Classification of Mentalities predominant in Time of
+Revolution.
+
+The classifications without which the study of the sciences is
+impossible must necessarily establish the discontinuous in the
+continuous, and for that reason are to a certain extent
+artificial. But they are necessary, since the continuous is only
+accessible in the form of the discontinuous.
+
+To create broad distinctions between the various mentalities
+observable in time of revolution, as we are about to do, is
+obviously to separate elements which encroach upon one another,
+which are fused or superimposed. We must resign ourselves to
+losing a little in exactitude in order to gain in lucidity. The
+fundamental types enumerated at the end of the preceding chapter,
+and which we are about to describe, synthetise groups which would
+escape analysis were we to attempt to study them in all their
+complexity.
+
+We have shown that man is influenced by different logics, which
+under normal conditions exist in juxtaposition, without mutually
+influencing one another. Under the action of various events they
+enter into mutual conflict, and the irreducible differences
+which divide them are visibly manifested, involving considerable
+individual and social upheavals.
+
+Mystic logic, which we shall presently consider as it appears in
+the Jacobin mind, plays a very important part. But it is not
+alone in its action. The other forms of logic--affective logic,
+collective logic, and rational logic--may predominate according
+to circumstances.
+
+
+2. The Mystic Mentality.
+
+
+Leaving aside for the moment the influence of affective,
+rational, and collective logic, we will occupy ourselves solely
+with the considerable part played by the mystic elements which
+have prevailed in so many revolutions, and notably in the French
+Revolution.
+
+The chief characteristic of the mystic temperament consists in
+the attribution of a mysterious power to superior beings or
+forces, which are incarnated in the form of idols, fetiches,
+words, or formulae.
+
+The mystic spirit is at the bottom of all the religious and most
+political beliefs. These latter would often vanish could we
+deprive them of the mystic elements which are their chief
+support.
+
+Grafted on the sentiments and passionate impulses which it
+directs, mystic logic constitutes the might of the great popular
+movements. Men who would be by no means ready to allow
+themselves to be killed for the best of reasons will readily
+sacrifice their lives to a mystic ideal which has become an
+object of adoration.
+
+The principles of the Revolution speedily inspired a wave of
+mystic enthusiasm analogous to those provoked by the various
+religious beliefs which had preceded it. All they did was to
+change the orientation of a mental ancestry which the
+centuries had solidified.
+
+So there is nothing astonishing in the savage zeal of the men of
+the Convention. Their mystic mentality was the same as that of
+the Protestants at the time of the Reformation. The principal
+heroes of the Terror--Couthon, Saint-Just, Robespierre, &c.--were
+Apostles. Like Polyeuctes, destroying the altars of the false
+gods to propagate his faith, they dreamed of converting the
+globe. Their enthusiasm spilled itself over the earth.
+Persuaded that their magnificent formulae were sufficient to
+overturn thrones, they did not hesitate to declare war upon
+kings. And as a strong faith is always superior to a doubtful
+faith, they victoriously faced all Europe.
+
+The mystic spirit of the leaders of the Revolution was betrayed
+in the least details of their public life. Robespierre,
+convinced that he was supported by the Almighty, assured his
+hearers in a speech that the Supreme Being had ``decreed the
+Republic since the beginning of time.'' In his quality of High
+Pontiff of a State religion he made the Convention vote a decree
+declaring that ``the French People recognises the existence of
+the Supreme Being and the immortality of the soul.'' At the
+festival of this Supreme Being, seated on a kind of throne, he
+preached a lengthy sermon.
+
+The Jacobin Club, directed by Robespierre, finally assumed all
+the functions of a council. There Maximilien proclaimed ``the
+idea of a Great Being who watches over oppressed innocence and
+who punishes triumphant crime.''
+
+All the heretics who criticised the Jacobin orthodoxy were
+excommunicated--that is, were sent to the Revolutionary Tribunal,
+which they left only for the scaffold.
+
+The mystic mentality of which Robespierre was the most celebrated
+representative did not die with him. Men of identical mentality
+are to be found among the French politicians of to-day. The old
+religious beliefs no longer rule their minds, but they are the
+creatures of political creeds which they would very soon force on
+others, as did Robespierre, if they had the chance of so doing.
+Always ready to kill if killing would spread their faith, the
+mystics of all ages have employed the same means of persuasion as
+soon as they have become the masters.
+
+It is therefore quite natural that Robespierre should still have
+many admirers. Minds moulded like his are to be met with in
+their thousands. His conceptions were not guillotined with him.
+Old as humanity, they will only disappear with the last believer.
+
+This mystic aspect of all revolutions has escaped the majority of
+the historians. They will persist for a long time yet in trying
+to explain by means of rational logic a host of phenomena which
+have nothing to do with reason. I have already cited a passage
+from the history of MM. Lavisse and Rambaud, in which the
+Reformation is explained as ``the result of the free individual
+reflections suggested to simple folk by an extremely pious
+conscience, and a bold and courageous reason.''
+
+Such movements are never comprehended by those who imagine that
+their origin is rational. Political or religious, the beliefs
+which have moved the world possess a common origin and
+follow the same laws. They are formed, not by the reason, but
+more often contrary to reason. Buddhism, Christianity, Islamism,
+the Reformation, sorcery, Jacobinism, socialism, spiritualism,
+&c., seem very different forms of belief, but they have, I
+repeat, identical mystic and affective bases, and obey forms of
+logic which have no affinity with rational logic. Their might
+resides precisely in the fact that reason has as little power to
+create them as to transform them.
+
+The mystic mentality of our modern political apostles is strongly
+marked in an article dealing with one of our recent ministers,
+which I cite from a leading journal:
+
+``One may ask into what category does M. A----fall? Could we
+say, for instance, that he belongs to the group of unbelievers?
+Far from it! Certainly M. A---- has not adopted any positive
+faith; certainly he curses Rome and Geneva, rejecting all the
+traditional dogmas and all the known Churches. But if he makes a
+clean sweep it is in order to found his own Church on the ground
+so cleared, a Church more dogmatic than all the rest; and his own
+inquisition, whose brutal intolerance would have no reason to
+envy the most notorious of Torquemadas.
+
+`` `We cannot,' he says, `allow such a thing as scholastic
+neutrality. We demand lay instruction in all its plenitude, and
+are consequently the enemies of educational liberty.' If he does
+not suggest erecting the stake and the pyre, it is only on
+account of the evolution of manners, which he is forced to take
+into account to a certain extent, whether he will or no. But,
+not being able to commit men to the torture, he invokes the
+secular arm to condemn their doctrines to death. This is exactly
+the point of view of the great inquisitors. It is the same
+attack upon thought. This freethinker has so free a spirit that
+every philosophy he does not accept appears to him, not only
+ridiculous and grotesque, but criminal. He flatters himself that
+he alone is in possession of the absolute truth. Of this he is
+so entirely sure that everyone who contradicts him seems to him
+an execrable monster and a public enemy. He does not suspect for
+a moment that after all his personal views are only hypotheses,
+and that he is all the more laughable for claiming a Divine right
+for them precisely because they deny divinity. Or, at least,
+they profess to do so; but they re-establish it in another shape,
+which immediately makes one regret the old. M. A---- is a
+sectary of the goddess Reason, of whom he has made a Moloch, an
+oppressive deity hungry for sacrifice. No more liberty of
+thought for any one except for himself and his friends; such is
+the free thought of M. A----. The outlook is truly attractive.
+But perhaps too many idols have been cast down during the last
+few centuries for men to bow before this one.''
+
+We must hope for the sake of liberty that these gloomy fanatics
+will never finally become our masters.
+
+Given the silent power of reason over mystic beliefs, it is quite
+useless to seek to discuss, as is so often done, the rational
+value of revolutionary or political ideas. Only their influence
+can interest us. It matters little that the theories of the
+supposed equality of men, the original goodness of mankind, the
+possibility of re-making society by means of laws, have
+been given the lie by observation and experience. These empty
+illusions must be counted among the most potent motives of action
+that humanity has known.
+
+
+3. The Jacobin Mentality.
+
+
+Although the term ``Jacobin mentality'' does not really belong to
+any true classification, I employ it here because it sums up a
+clearly defined combination which constitutes a veritable
+psychological species.
+
+This mentality dominates the men of the French Revolution, but is
+not peculiar to them, as it still represents one of the most
+active elements in our politics.
+
+The mystic mentality which we have already considered is an
+essential factor of the Jacobin mind, but it is not in itself
+enough to constitute that mind. Other elements, which we shall
+now examine, must be added.
+
+The Jacobins do not in the least suspect their mysticism. On the
+contrary, they profess to be guided solely by pure reason.
+During the Revolution they invoked reason incessantly, and
+considered it as their only guide to conduct.
+
+The majority of historians have adopted this rationalist
+conception of the Jacobin mind, and Taine fell into the same
+error. It is in the abuse of rationalism that he seeks the
+origin of a great proportion of the acts of the Jacobins. The
+pages in which he has dealt with the subject contain many truths,
+however, and as they are in other ways very remarkable, I
+reproduce the most important passages here:--
+
+``Neither exaggerated self-love nor dogmatic reasoning is
+rare in the human species. In all countries these two roots of
+the Jacobin spirit subsist, secret and indestructible. . . . At
+twenty years of age, when a young man is entering into the world,
+his reason is stimulated simultaneously with his pride. In the
+first place, whatever society he may move in, it is contemptible
+to pure reason, for it has not been constructed by a philosophic
+legislator according to a principle, but successive generations
+have arranged it according to their multiple and ever-changing
+needs. It is not the work of logic, but of history, and the
+young reasoner shrugs his shoulders at the sight of this old
+building, whose site is arbitrary, whose architecture is
+incoherent, and whose inconveniences are obvious. . . . The
+majority of young people, above all those who have their way to
+make, are more or less Jacobin on leaving college. . . .
+Jacobinism is born of social decomposition just as mushrooms are
+born of a fermenting soil. Consider the authentic monuments of
+its thought--the speeches of Robespierre and Saint-Just, the
+debates of the Legislative Assembly and the Convention, the
+harangues, addresses, and reports of Girondists and Montagnards.
+Never did men speak so much to say so little; the empty verbiage
+and swollen emphasis swamp any truth there may be beneath their
+monotony and their turgidity. The Jacobin is full of respect for
+the phantoms of his reasoning brain; in his eyes they are more
+real than living men, and their suffrage is the only suffrage he
+recognises--he will march onward in all sincerity at the head of
+a procession of imaginary followers. The millions of
+metaphysical wills which he has created in the image of his own
+will sustain him by their unanimous assent, and he will
+project outwards, like a chorus of triumph and acclamation, the
+inward echo of his own voice.''
+
+While admiring Taine's description, I think he has not exactly
+grasped the psychology of the Jacobin.
+
+The mind of the true Jacobin, at the time of the Revolution as
+now, was composed of elements which we must analyse if we are to
+understand its function.
+
+This analysis will show in the first place that the Jacobin is
+not a rationalist, but a believer. Far from building his belief
+on reason, he moulds reason to his belief, and although his
+speeches are steeped in rationalism he employs it very little in
+his thoughts and his conduct.
+
+A Jacobin who reasoned as much as he is accused of reasoning
+would be sometimes accessible to the voice of reason. Now,
+observation proves, from the time of the Revolution to our own
+days, that the Jacobin is never influenced by reasoning, however
+just, and it is precisely here that his strength resides.
+
+And why is he not accessible to reason? Simply because his
+vision of things, always extremely limited, does not permit of
+his resisting the powerful and passionate impulses which guide
+him.
+
+These two elements, feeble reason and strong passions, would not
+of themselves constitute the Jacobin mind. There is another.
+
+Passion supports convictions, but hardly ever creates them. Now,
+the true Jacobin has forcible convictions. What is to sustain
+them? Here the mystic elements whose action we have already
+studied come into play. The Jacobin is a mystic who has
+replaced the old divinities by new gods. Imbued with the power
+of words and formulae, he attributes to these a mysterious
+power. To serve these exigent divinities he does not shrink from
+the most violent measures. The laws voted by our modern Jacobins
+furnish a proof of this fact.
+
+The Jacobin mentality is found especially in narrow and
+passionate characters. It implies, in fact, a narrow and rigid
+mind, inaccessible to all criticism and to all considerations but
+those of faith.
+
+The mystic and affective elements which dominate the mind of the
+Jacobin condemn him to an extreme simplicity. Grasping only the
+superficial relations of things, nothing prevents him from taking
+for realities the chimerical images which are born of his
+imagination. The sequence of phenomena and their results escape
+him. He never raises his eyes from his dream.
+
+As we may see, it is not by the development of his logical reason
+that the Jacobin exceeds. He possesses very little logic of this
+kind, and therefore he often becomes dangerous. Where a superior
+man would hesitate or halt the Jacobin, who has placed his feeble
+reason at the service of his impulses, goes forward with
+certainty.
+
+So that although the Jacobin is a great reasoner, this does not
+mean that he is in the least guided by reason. When he imagines
+he is being led by reason it is really his passions and his
+mysticism that lead him. Like all those who are convinced and
+hemmed in by the walls of faith, he can never escape therefrom.
+
+A true aggressive theologian, he is astonishingly like the
+disciples of Calvin described in a previous chapter. Hypnotised
+by their faith, nothing could deter them from their object. All
+those who contradicted their articles of faith were considered
+worthy of death. They too seemed to be powerful reasoners.
+Ignorant, like the Jacobins, of the secret forces that led them,
+they believed that reason was their sole guide, while in reality
+they were the slaves of mysticism and passion.
+
+The truly rationalistic Jacobin would be incomprehensible, and
+would merely make reason despair. The passionate and mystical
+Jacobin is, on the contrary, easily intelligible.
+
+With these three elements--a very weak reasoning power, very
+strong passions, and an intense mysticism--we have the true
+psychological components of the mind of the Jacobin.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER III
+
+THE REVOLUTIONARY AND CRIMINAL MENTALITIES
+
+1. The Revolutionary Mentality.
+
+We have just seen that the mystic elements are one of the
+components of the Jacobin mentality. We shall now see that they
+enter into another form of mentality which is also clearly
+defined, the revolutionary mentality.
+
+In all ages societies have contained a certain number of restless
+spirits, unstable and discontented, ready to rebel against any
+established order of affairs. They are actuated by the mere love
+of revolt, and if some magic power could realise all their
+desires they would simply revolt again.
+
+This special mentality often results from a faulty adaptation of
+the individual to his surroundings, or from an excess of
+mysticism, but it may also be merely a question of temperament or
+arise from pathological disturbances.
+
+The need of revolt presents very different degrees of intensity,
+from simple discontent expressed in words directed against men
+and things to the need of destroying them. Sometimes the
+individual turns upon himself the revolutionary frenzy that he
+cannot otherwise exercise. Russia is full of these madmen,
+who, not content with committing arson or throwing bombs at
+hazard into the crowd, finally mutilate themselves, like the
+Skopzis and other analogous sects.
+
+These perpetual rebels are generally highly suggestible beings,
+whose mystic mentality is obsessed by fixed ideas. Despite the
+apparent energy indicated by their actions they are really weak
+characters, and are incapable of mastering themselves
+sufficiently to resist the impulses that rule them. The mystic
+spirit which animates them furnishes pretexts for their violence,
+and enables them to regard themselves as great reformers.
+
+In normal times the rebels which every society contains are
+restrained by the laws, by their environment--in short, by all
+the usual social constraints, and therefore remain undetected.
+But as soon as a time of disturbance begins these constraints
+grow weaker, and the rebel can give a free reign to his
+instincts. He then becomes the accredited leader of a movement.
+The motive of the revolution matters little to him; he will give
+his life indifferently for the red flag or the white, or for the
+liberation of a country which he has heard vaguely mentioned.
+
+The revolutionary spirit is not always pushed to the extremes
+which render it dangerous. When, instead of deriving from
+affective or mystic impulses, it has an intellectual origin, it
+may become a source of progress. It is thanks to those spirits
+who are sufficiently independent to be intellectually
+revolutionary that a civilisation is able to escape from the yoke
+of tradition and habit when this becomes too heavy. The
+sciences, arts, and industries especially have progressed by
+the aid of such men. Galileo, Lavoisier, Darwin, and Pasteur
+were such revolutionaries.
+
+Although it is not necessary that a nation should possess any
+large number of such spirits, it is very necessary that it should
+possess some. Without them men would still be living in caves.
+
+The revolutionary audacity which results in discoveries implies
+very rare faculties. It necessitates notably an independence of
+mind sufficient to escape from the influence of current opinions,
+and a judgement that can grasp, under superficial analogies, the
+hidden realities. This form of revolutionary spirit is creative,
+while that examined above is destructive.
+
+The revolutionary mentality may, therefore, be compared to
+certain physiological states in the life of the individual which
+are normally useful, but which, when exaggerated, take a
+pathological form which is always hurtful.
+
+
+2. The Criminal Mentality.
+
+
+All the civilised societies inevitably drag behind them a residue
+of degenerates, of the unadapted, of persons affected by various
+taints. Vagabonds, beggars, fugitives from justice, thieves,
+assassins, and starving creatures that live from day to day, may
+constitute the criminal population of the great cities. In
+ordinary times these waste products of civilisation are more or
+less restrained by the police. During revolution nothing
+restrains them, and they can easily gratify their instincts to
+murder and plunder. In the dregs of society the revolutionaries
+of all times are sure of finding recruits. Eager only to kill
+and to plunder, little matters to them the cause they are
+sworn to defend. If the chances of murder and pillage are better
+in the party attacked, they will promptly change their colours.
+
+To these criminals, properly so called, the incurable plague of
+all societies, we must add the class of semi-criminals.
+Wrongdoers on occasion, they never rebel so long as the fear of
+the established order restrains them, but as soon as it weakens
+they enrol themselves in the army of revolution.
+
+These two categories--habitual and occasional criminals--form an
+army of disorder which is fit for nothing but the creation of
+disorder. All the revolutionaries, all the founders of religious
+or political leagues, have constantly counted on their support.
+
+We have already stated that this population, with its criminal
+mentality, exercised a considerable influence during the French
+Revolution. It always figured in the front rank of the riots
+which occurred almost daily. Certain historians have spoken with
+respect and emotion of the way in which the sovereign people
+enforced its will upon the Convention, invading the hall armed
+with pikes, the points of which were sometimes decorated with
+newly severed heads. If we analyse the elements composing the
+pretended delegations of the sovereign people, we shall find
+that, apart from a small number of simple souls who submitted to
+the impulses of the leaders, the mass was almost entirely formed
+of the bandits of whom I have been speaking. To them were due
+the innumerable murders of which the massacres of September and
+the killing of the Princesse de Lamballe were merely typical.
+
+They terrorised all the great Assemblies, from the Constituent
+Assembly to the Convention, and for ten years they helped to
+ravage France. If by some miracle this army of criminals could
+have been eliminated, the progress of the Revolution would have
+been very different. They stained it with blood from its dawn to
+its decline. Reason could do nothing with them but they could do
+much against reason.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER IV
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGY OF REVOLUTIONARY CROWDS
+
+1. General Characteristics of the Crowd.
+
+Whatever their origin, revolutions do not produce their full
+effects until they have penetrated the soul of the multitude.
+They therefore represent a consequence of the psychology of
+crowds.
+
+Although I have studied collective psychology at length in
+another volume, I must here recall its principal laws.
+
+Man, as part of a multitude, is a very different being from the
+same man as an isolated individual. His conscious individuality
+vanishes in the unconscious personality of the crowd.
+
+Material contact is not absolutely necessary to produce in the
+individual the mentality of the crowd. Common passions and
+sentiments, provoked by certain events, are often sufficient to
+create it.
+
+The collective mind, momentarily formed, represents a very
+special kind of aggregate. Its chief peculiarity is that it is
+entirely dominated by unconscious elements, and is subject to a
+peculiar collective logic.
+
+Among the other characteristics of crowds, we must note their
+infinite credulity and exaggerated sensibility, their short-
+sightedness, and their incapacity to respond to the influences of
+reason. Affirmation, contagion, repetition, and prestige
+constitute almost the only means of persuading them. Reality and
+experience have no effect upon them. The multitude will admit
+anything; nothing is impossible in the eyes of the crowd.
+
+By reason of the extreme sensibility of crowds, their sentiments,
+good or bad, are always exaggerated. This exaggeration increases
+still further in times of revolution. The least excitement will
+then lead the multitude to act with the utmost fury. Their
+credulity, so great even in the normal state, is still further
+increased; the most improbable statements are accepted. Arthur
+Young relates that when he visited the springs near Clermont, at
+the time of the French Revolution, his guide was stopped by the
+people, who were persuaded that he had come by order of the Queen
+to mine and blow up the town. The most horrible tales concerning
+the Royal Family were circulated, depicting it as a nest of
+ghouls and vampires.
+
+These various characteristics show that man in the crowd descends
+to a very low degree in the scale of civilisation. He becomes a
+savage, with all a savage's faults and qualities, with all his
+momentary violence, enthusiasm, and heroism. In the intellectual
+domain a crowd is always inferior to the isolated unit. In the
+moral and sentimental domain it may be his superior. A crowd
+will commit a crime as readily as an act of abnegation.
+
+Personal characteristics vanish in the crowd, which exerts an
+extraordinary influence upon the individuals which form it. The
+miser becomes generous, the sceptic a believer, the honest
+man a criminal, the coward a hero. Examples of such
+transformations abounded during the great Revolution.
+
+As part of a jury or a parliament, the collective man renders
+verdicts or passes laws of which he would never have dreamed in
+his isolated condition.
+
+One of the most notable consequences of the influence of a
+collectivity upon the individuals who compose it is the
+unification of their sentiments and wills. This psychological
+unity confers a remarkable force upon crowds.
+
+The formation of such a mental unity results chiefly from the
+fact that in a crowd gestures and actions are extremely
+contagious. Acclamations of hatred, fury, or love are
+immediately approved and repeated.
+
+What is the origin of these common sentiments, this common will?
+They are propagated by contagion, but a point of departure is
+necessary before this contagion can take effect. Without a
+leader the crowd is an amorphous entity incapable of action.
+
+A knowledge of the laws relating to the psychology of crowds is
+indispensable to the interpretation of the elements of our
+Revolution, and to a comprehension of the conduct of
+revolutionary assemblies, and the singular transformations of the
+individuals who form part of them. Pushed by the unconscious
+forces of the collective soul, they more often than not say what
+they did not intend, and vote what they would not have wished to
+vote.
+
+Although the laws of collective psychology have sometimes been
+divined instinctively by superior statesmen, the majority of
+Governments have not understood and do not understand
+them. It is because they do not understand them that so many of
+them have fallen so easily. When we see the facility with which
+certain Governments were overthrown by an insignificant riot--as
+happened in the case of the monarchy of Louis-Philippe--the
+dangers of an ignorance of collective psychology are evident.
+The marshal in command of the troops in 1848, which were more
+than sufficient to defend the king, certainly did not understand
+that the moment he allowed the crowd to mingle with the troops
+the latter, paralysed by suggestion and contagion, would cease to
+do their duty. Neither did he know that as the multitude is
+extremely sensible to prestige it needs a great display of force
+to impress it, and that such a display will at once suppress
+hostile demonstrations. He was equally ignorant of the fact that
+all gatherings should be dispersed immediately. All these things
+have been taught by experience, but in 1848 these lessons had not
+been grasped. At the time of the great Revolution the psychology
+of crowds was even less understood.
+
+
+2. How the Stability of the Racial Mind limits the Oscillations
+of the Mind of the Crowd.
+
+
+A people can in a sense be likened to a crowd. It possesses
+certain characteristics, but the oscillations of these
+characteristics are limited by the soul or mind of the race. The
+mind of the race has a fixity unknown to the transitory mind of
+the crowd.
+
+When a people possesses an ancestral soul established by a long
+past the soul of the crowd is always dominated thereby.
+
+A people differs from a crowd also in that it is composed of a
+collection of groups, each having different interests and
+passions. In a crowd properly so-called--a popular assembly, for
+example--there are unities which may belong to very different
+social categories.
+
+A people sometimes seems as mobile as a crowd, but we must not
+forget that behind its mobility, its enthusiasms, its violence
+and destructiveness, the extremely tenacious and conservative
+instincts of the racial mind persist. The history of the
+Revolution and the century which has followed shows how the
+conservative spirit finally overcomes the spirit of destruction.
+More than one system of government which the people has shattered
+has been restored by the people.
+
+It is not as easy to work upon the mind of the people--that is,
+the mind of the race--as on the mind of a crowd. The means of
+action are indirect and slower (journals, conferences, speeches,
+books, &c.). The elements of persuasion always come under the
+headings already given: affirmation, repetition, prestige, and
+contagion.
+
+Mental contagion may affect a whole people instantaneously, but
+more often it operates slowly, creeping from group to group.
+Thus was the Reformation propagated in France.
+
+A people is far less excitable than a crowd; but certain events--
+national insults, threats of invasion, &c.--may arouse it
+instantly. Such a phenomenon was observed on several occasions
+during the Revolution, notably at the time of the insolent
+manifesto issued by the Duke of Brunswick. The Duke knew little
+indeed of the psychology of the French race when he
+proffered his threats. Not only did he considerably prejudice
+the cause of Louis XVI.; but he also damaged his own, since his
+intervention raised from the soil an army eager to fight him.
+
+This sudden explosion of feeling throughout a whole race has been
+observed in all nations. Napoleon did not understand the power
+of such explosions when he invaded Spain and Russia. One may
+easily disaggregate the facile mind of a crowd, but one can do
+nothing before the permanent soul of a race. Certainly the
+Russian peasant is a very indifferent being, gross and narrow by
+nature, yet at the first news of invasion he was transformed.
+One may judge of this fact on reading a letter written by
+Elizabeth, wife of the Emperor Alexander I.
+
+``From the moment when Napoleon had crossed our frontiers it was
+as though an electric spark had spread through all Russia; and if
+the immensity of its area had made it possible for the news to
+penetrate simultaneously to every corner of the Empire a cry of
+indignation would have arisen so terrible that I believe it would
+have resounded to the ends of the earth. As Napoleon advances
+this feeling is growing yet stronger. Old men who have lost all
+or nearly all their goods are saying: `We shall find a way of
+living. Anything is preferable to a shameful peace.' Women all
+of whose kin are in the army regard the dangers they are running
+as secondary, and fear nothing but peace. Happily this peace,
+which would be the death-warrant of Russia, will not be
+negotiated; the Emperor does not conceive of such an idea, and
+even if he would he could not. This is the heroic side of our
+position.''
+
+The Empress describes to her mother the two following traits,
+which give some idea of the degree of resistance of which the
+soul of the Russian is capable:--
+
+``The Frenchmen had caught some unhappy peasants in Moscow, whom
+they thought to force to serve in their ranks, and in order that
+they should not be able to escape they branded their hands as one
+brands horses in the stud. One of them asked what this mark
+meant; he was told it signified that he was a French soldier.
+`What! I am a soldier of the Emperor of the French!' he said.
+And immediately he took his hatchet, cut off his hand, and threw
+it at the feet of those present, saying, `Take it--there's your
+mark!'
+
+``At Moscow, too, the French had taken a score of peasants of
+whom they wished to make an example in order to frighten the
+villagers, who were picking off the French foraging parties and
+were making war as well as the detachments of regular troops.
+They ranged them against a wall and read their sentence in
+Russian. They waited for them to beg for mercy: instead of that
+they took farewell of one another and made their sign of the
+cross. The French fired on the first of them; they waited for
+the rest to beg for pardon in their terror, and to promise to
+change their conduct. They fired on the second, and on the
+third, and so on all the twenty, without a single one having
+attempted to implore the clemency of the enemy. Napoleon has
+not once had the pleasure of profaning this word in Russia.''
+
+Among the characteristics of the popular mind we must mention
+that in all peoples and all ages it has been saturated
+with mysticism. The people will always be convinced that
+superior beings--divinities, Governments, or great men--have the
+power to change things at will. This mystic side produces an
+intense need of adoration. The people must have a fetich, either
+a man or a doctrine. This is why, when threatened with anarchy,
+it calls for a Messiah to save it.
+
+Like the crowd, but more slowly, the people readily passes from
+adoration to hatred. A man may be the hero of the people at one
+period, and finally earn its curses. These variations of popular
+opinion concerning political personalities may be observed in all
+times. The history of Cromwell furnishes us with a very curious
+example.[5]
+
+
+[5] After having overthrown a dynasty and refused a crown he was
+buried like a king among kings. Two years later his body was
+torn from the tomb, and his head, cut off by the executioner, was
+exposed above the gate of the House of Parliament. A little
+while ago a statue was raised to him. The old anarchist turned
+autocrat now figures in the gallery of demigods.
+
+
+
+4. The Role of the Leader in Revolutionary Movements.
+
+
+All the varieties of crowds--homogeneous and heterogeneous,
+assemblies, peoples, clubs, &c.--are, as we have often repeated,
+aggregates incapable of unity and action so long as they find no
+master to lead them.
+
+I have shown elsewhere, making use of certain physiological
+experiments, that the unconscious collective mind of the crowd
+seems bound up with the mind of the leader. The latter gives it
+a single will and imposes absolute obedience.
+
+The leader acts especially through suggestion. His success
+depends on his fashion of provoking this suggestion. Many
+experiments have shown to what point a collectivity may be
+subjected to suggestion.[6]
+
+
+[6] Among the numerous experiments made to prove this fact one of
+the most remarkable was performed on the pupils of his class by
+Professor Glosson and published in the Revue Scientifique for
+October 28, 1899.
+
+``I prepared a bottle filled with distilled water carefully
+wrapped in cotton and packed in a box. After several other
+experiments I stated that I wished to measure the rapidity with
+which an odour would diffuse itself through the air, and asked
+those present to raise their hands the moment they perceived the
+odour. . . . I took out the bottle and poured the water on the
+cotton, turning my head away during the operation, then took up a
+stop-watch and awaited the result. . . . I explained that I was
+absolutely sure that no one present had ever smelt the odour of
+the chemical composition I had spilt. . . . At the end of
+fifteen seconds the majority of those in front had held up their
+hands, and in forty seconds the odour had reached the back of the
+hall by fairly regular waves. About three-quarters of those
+present declared that they perceived the odour. A larger number
+would doubtless have succumbed to suggestion, if at the end of a
+minute I had not been forced to stop the experiment, some of
+those in the front rows being unpleasantly affected by the odour,
+and wishing to leave the hall.''
+
+
+
+According to the suggestions of the leaders, the multitude will
+be calm, furious, criminal, or heroic. These various suggestions
+may sometimes appear to present a rational aspect, but they will
+only appear to be reasonable. A crowd is in reality inaccessible
+to reason; the only ideas capable of influencing it will always
+be sentiments evoked in the form of images.
+
+The history of the Revolution shows on every page how easily the
+multitude follows the most contradictory impulses given by
+its different leaders. We see it applaud just as vigorously at
+the triumph of the Girondists, the Hebertists, the Dantonists,
+and the Terrorists as at their successive downfalls. One may be
+quite sure, also, that the crowd understood nothing of these
+events.
+
+At a distance one can only confusedly perceive the part played by
+the leaders, for they commonly work in the shade. To grasp this
+clearly we must study them in contemporary events. We shall then
+see how readily the leader can provoke the most violent popular
+movements. We are not thinking here of the strikes of the
+postmen or railway men, in which the discontent of the employees
+might intervene, but of events in which the crowd was not in the
+least interested. Such, for example, was the popular rising
+provoked by a few Socialist leaders amidst the Parisian populace
+on the morrow of the execution of Ferrer, in Spain. The French
+crowd had never heard of Ferrer. In Spain his execution was
+almost unnoticed. In Paris the incitements of a few leaders
+sufficed to hurl a regular popular army upon the Spanish Embassy,
+with the intention of burning it. Part of the garrison had to be
+employed to protect it. Energetically repulsed, the assailants
+contented themselves with sacking a few shops and building some
+barricades.
+
+At the same time, the leaders gave another proof of their
+influence. Finally understanding that the burning of a foreign
+embassy might be extremely dangerous, they ordered a pacific
+demonstration for the following day, and were as faithfully
+obeyed as if they had ordered the most violent riot. No
+example could better show the importance of leaders and the
+submission of the crowd
+
+The historians who, from Michelet to M. Aulard, have represented
+the revolutionary crowd as having acted on its own initiative,
+without leaders, do not comprehend its psychology.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER V
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE REVOLUTIONARY ASSEMBLIES
+
+1. Psychological Characteristics of the great Revolutionary
+Assemblies.
+
+A great political assembly, a parliament for example, is a crowd,
+but a crowd which sometimes fails in effectual action on account
+of the contrary sentiments of the hostile groups composing it.
+
+The presence of these groups, actuated by different interests,
+must make us consider an assembly as formed of superimposed and
+heterogeneous crowds, each obeying its particular leaders. The
+law of the mental unity of crowds is manifested only in each
+group, and it is only as a result of exceptional circumstances
+that the different groups act with a single intention.
+
+Each group in an assembly represents a single being. The
+individuals contributing to the formation of this being are no
+longer themselves, and will unhesitatingly vote against their
+convictions and their wishes. On the eve of the day when Louis
+XVI. was to be condemned Vergniaud protested with indignation
+against the suggestion that he should vote for his death; but he
+did so vote on the following day.
+
+The action of a group consists chiefly in fortifying hesitating
+opinions. All feeble individual convictions become confirmed
+upon becoming collective.
+
+Leaders of great repute or unusual violence can sometimes, by
+acting on all the groups of an assembly, make them a single
+crowd. The majority of the members of the Convention enacted
+measures entirely contrary to their opinions under the influence
+of a very small number of such leaders.
+
+Collectivities have always given way before active sectaries.
+The history of the revolutionary Assemblies shows how
+pusillanimous they were, despite the boldness of their language
+respecting kings, before the leaders of the popular riots. The
+invasion of a band of energumens commanded by an imperious leader
+was enough to make them vote then and there the most absurd and
+contradictory measures.
+
+An assembly, having the characteristics of a crowd, will, like a
+crowd, be extreme in its sentiments. Excessive in its violence,
+it will be excessive in its cowardice. In general it will be
+insolent to the weak and servile before the strong.
+
+We remember the fearful humility of the Parliament when the
+youthful Louis XIV. entered, whip in hand, to pronounce his brief
+speech. We know with what increasing impertinence the
+Constituent Assembly treated Louis XVI. as it felt that he was
+becoming defenceless. Finally, we recall the terror of the
+Convention under the reign of Robespierre.
+
+This characteristic of assemblies being a general law, the
+convocation of an assembly by a sovereign when his power is
+failing must be regarded as a gross error in psychology. The
+assembling of the States General cost the life of Louis
+XVI. It all but lost Henry III. his throne, when, obliged to
+leave Paris, he had the unhappy idea of assembling the Estates at
+Blois. Conscious of the weakness of the king, the Estates at
+once spoke as masters of the situation, modifying taxes,
+dismissing officials, and claiming that their decisions should
+have the force of law.
+
+This progressive exaggeration of sentiments was plainly
+demonstrated in all the assemblies of the Revolution. The
+Constituent Assembly, at first extremely respectful toward the
+royal authority and its prerogatives, finally proclaimed itself a
+sovereign Assembly, and treated Louis XVI as a mere official.
+The Convention, after relatively moderate beginnings, ended with
+a preliminary form of the Terror, when judgments were still
+surrounded by certain legal guarantees: then, quickly increasing
+its powers, it enacted a law depriving all accused persons of the
+right of defence, permitting their condemnation upon the mere
+suspicion of being suspect. Yielding more and more to its
+sanguinary frenzy, it finally decimated itself. Girondists,
+Hebertists, Dantonists, and Robespierrists successively ended
+their careers at the hands of the executioner.
+
+This exaggeration of the sentiments of assemblies explains why
+they were always so little able to control their own destinies
+and why they so often arrived at conclusions exactly contrary to
+the ends proposed. Catholic and royalist, the Constituent
+Assembly, instead of the constitutional monarchy it wished to
+establish and the religion it wished to defend, rapidly led
+France to a violent republic and the persecution of the clergy.
+
+Political assemblies are composed, as we have seen, of
+heterogeneous groups, but they have sometimes been formed of
+homogeneous groups, as, for instance, certain of the clubs, which
+played so enormous a part during the Revolution, and whose
+psychology deserves a special examination.
+
+
+2. The Psychology of the Revolutionary Clubs.
+
+
+Small assemblies of men possessing the same opinions, the same
+beliefs, and the same interests, which eliminate all dissentient
+voices, differ from the great assemblies by the unity of their
+sentiments and therefore their wills. Such were the communes,
+the religious congregations, the corporations, and the clubs
+during the Revolution, the secret societies during the first half
+of the nineteenth century, and the Freemasons and syndicalists of
+to-day.
+
+The points of difference between a heterogeneous assembly and a
+homogeneous club must be thoroughly grasped if we are to
+comprehend the progress of the French Revolution. Until the
+Directory and especially during the Convention the Revolution was
+directed by the clubs.
+
+Despite the unity of will due to the absence of dissident parties
+the clubs obey the laws of the psychology of crowds. They are
+consequently subjugated by leaders. This we see especially in
+the Jacobin Club, which was dominated by Robespierre.
+
+The function of the leader of a club, a homogeneous crowd, is far
+more difficult than that of a leader of a heterogeneous crowd.
+The latter may easily be led by harping on a small number of
+strings, but in a homogeneous group like a club, whose
+sentiments and interests are identical, the leader must
+know how to humour them and is often himself led.
+
+Part of the strength of homogeneous agglomerations resides in
+their anonymity. We know that during the Commune of 1871 a few
+anonymous orders sufficed to effect the burning of the finest
+monuments of Paris: the Hotel de Ville, the Tuileries, the
+Cour des Comptes, the buildings of the Legion of Honour, &c. A
+brief order from the anonymous committees, ``Burn Finances, burn
+Tuileries,'' &c., was immediately executed. An unlooked-for
+chance only saved the Louvre and its collections. We know too
+what religious attention is in our days accorded to the most
+absurd injunctions of the anonymous leaders of the trades unions.
+
+The clubs of Paris and the insurrectionary Commune were not less
+scrupulously obeyed at the time of the Revolution. An order
+emanating from these was sufficient to hurl upon the Assembly a
+popular army which dictated its wishes.
+
+Summing up the history of the Convention in another chapter, we
+shall see how frequent were these irruptions, and with what
+servility the Assembly, which according to the legends was so
+powerful bowed itself before the most imperative injunctions of a
+handful of rioters. Instructed by experience, the Directory
+closed the clubs and put an end to the invasion of the populace
+by energetically shooting them down.
+
+The Convention had early grasped the superiority of homogeneous
+groups over heterogeneous assemblies in matters of government,
+which is why it subdivided itself into committees composed each
+of a limited number of individuals. These committees--of
+Public Safety, of Finance, &c.--formed small sovereign assemblies
+in the midst of the larger Assembly. Their power was held in
+check only by that of the clubs.
+
+The preceding considerations show the power of groups over the
+wills of the members composing them. If the group is
+homogeneous, this action is considerable; if it is heterogeneous,
+it is less considerable but may still become important, either
+because the more powerful groups of an assembly will dominate
+those whose cohesion is weaker or because certain contagious
+sentiments will often extend themselves to all the members of an
+assembly.
+
+A memorable example of this influence of groups occurred at the
+time of the Revolution, when, on the night of the 4th of August,
+the nobles voted, on the proposition of one of their members, the
+abandonment of feudal privileges. Yet we know that the
+Revolution resulted in part from the refusal of the clergy and
+the nobles to renounce their privileges. Why did they refuse to
+renounce them at first? Simply because men in a crowd do not act
+as the same men singly. Individually no member of the nobility
+would ever have abandoned his rights.
+
+Of this influence of assemblies upon their members Napoleon at
+St. Helena cited some curious examples: ``Nothing was more
+common than to meet with men at this period quite unlike the
+reputation that their acts and words would seem to justify. For
+instance, one might have supposed Monge to be a terrible fellow;
+when war was decided upon he mounted the tribune of the Jacobins
+and declared that he would give his two daughters to the two
+first soldiers to be wounded by the enemy. He wanted the
+nobles to be killed, &c. Now, Monge was the most gentle and
+feeble of men, and wouldn't have had a chicken killed if he had
+had to do it with his own hands, or even to have it done in his
+presence.''
+
+
+3. A Suggested Explanation of the Progressive Exaggeration of
+Sentiments in Assemblies.
+
+
+If collective sentiments were susceptible of exact quantitative
+measurement, we might translate them by a curve which, after a
+first gradual ascent, runs upward with extreme rapidity and then
+falls almost vertically. The equation of this curve might be
+called the equation of the variations of collective sentiments
+subjected to a constant excitation.
+
+It is not always easy to explain the acceleration of certain
+sentiments under the influence of a constant exciting cause.
+Perhaps, however, one may say that if the laws of psychology are
+comparable to those of mechanics, a cause of invariable
+dimensions acting in a continuous fashion will rapidly increase
+the intensity of a sentiment. We know, for example, that a force
+which is constant in dimension and direction, such as gravity
+acting upon a mass, will cause an accelerated movement. The
+speed of a free object falling in space under the influence of
+gravity will be about 32 feet during the first second, 64 feet
+during the next, 96 feet during the next, &c. It would be easy,
+were the moving body allowed to fall from a sufficient height, to
+give it a velocity sufficient to perforate a plate of steel.
+
+But although this explanation is applicable to the acceleration
+of a sentiment subjected to a constant exciting cause, it
+does not tell us why the effects of acceleration finally and
+suddenly cease. Such a fall is only comprehensible if we bring
+in physiological factors--that is, if we remember that pleasure,
+like pain, cannot exceed certain limits, and that all sensations,
+when too violent, result in the paralysis of sensation. Our
+organism can only support a certain maximum of joy, pain, or
+effort, and it cannot support that maximum for long together.
+The hand which grasps a dynamometer soon exhausts its effort, and
+is obliged suddenly to let go.
+
+The study of the causes of the rapid disappearance of certain
+groups of sentiments in assemblies will remind us of the fact
+that beside the party which is predominant by means of its
+strength or prestige there are others whose sentiments,
+restrained by this force or prestige, have not reached their full
+development. Some chance circumstance may somewhat weaken the
+prevailing party, when immediately the suppressed sentiments of
+the adverse parties may become preponderant. The Mountain
+learned this lesson after Thermidor.
+
+All analogies that we may seek to establish between the laws of
+material phenomena and those which condition the evolution of
+affective and mystic factors are evidently extremely rough. They
+must be so until the mechanism of the cerebral functions is
+better understood than it is to-day.
+
+
+
+
+PART II
+
+THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
+
+
+BOOK I
+
+THE ORIGINS OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
+
+CHAPTER I
+
+THE OPINIONS OF HISTORIANS CONCERNING THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
+
+1. The Historians of the Revolution.
+
+The most contradictory opinions have been expressed respecting
+the French Revolution, and although only a century separates us
+from the period in question it seems impossible as yet to judge
+it calmly. For de Maistre it was ``a satanic piece of work,''
+and ``never was the action of the spirit of darkness so evidently
+manifested.'' For the modern Jacobins it has regenerated the
+human race.
+
+Foreigners who live in France still regard it as a subject to be
+avoided in conversation.
+
+``Everywhere,'' writes Barrett Wendell, ``this memory and these
+traditions are still endowed with such vitality that few persons
+are capable of considering them dispassionately. They still
+excite both enthusiasm and resentment; they are still regarded
+with a loyal and ardent spirit of partisanship. The better you
+come to understand France the more clearly you see that even to-
+day no study of the Revolution strikes any Frenchman as
+having been impartial.''
+
+This observation is perfectly correct. To be interpretable with
+equity, the events of the past must no longer be productive of
+results and must not touch the religious or political beliefs
+whose inevitable intolerance I have denoted.
+
+We must not therefore be surprised that historians express very
+different ideas respecting the Revolution. For a long time to
+come some will still see in it one of the most sinister events of
+history, while to others it will remain one of the most glorious.
+
+All writers on the subject have believed that they have related
+its course with impartiality, but in general they have merely
+supported contradictory theories of peculiar simplicity. The
+documents being innumerable and contradictory, their conscious or
+unconscious choice has readily enabled them to justify their
+respective theories.
+
+The older historians of the Revolution--Thiers, Quinet, and,
+despite his talent, Michelet himself, are somewhat eclipsed to-
+day. Their doctrines were by no means complicated; a historic
+fatalism prevails generally in their work. Thiers regarded the
+Revolution as the result of several centuries of absolute
+monarchy, and the Terror as the necessary consequence of foreign
+invasion. Quinet described the excesses of 1793 as the result of
+a long-continued despotism, but declared that the tyranny of the
+Convention was unnecessary, and hampered the work of the
+Revolution. Michelet saw in this last merely the work of the
+people, whom he blindly admired, and commenced the glorification
+continued by other historians.
+
+The former reputation of all these historians has been to a great
+extent effaced by that of Taine. Although equally impassioned,
+he threw a brilliant light upon the revolutionary period, and it
+will doubtless be long before his work is superseded.
+
+Work so important is bound to show faults. Taine is admirable in
+the representation of facts and persons, but he attempts to judge
+by the standard of rational logic events which were not dictated
+by reason, and which, therefore, he cannot interpret. His
+psychology, excellent when it is merely descriptive, is very weak
+as soon as it becomes explanatory. To affirm that Robespierre
+was a pedantic ``swotter'' is not to reveal the causes of his
+absolute power over the Convention, at a time when he had spent
+several months in decimating it with perfect impunity. It has
+very justly been said of Taine that he saw well and understood
+little.
+
+Despite these restrictions his work is highly remarkable and has
+not been equalled. We may judge of his immense influence by the
+exasperation which he causes among the faithful defenders of
+Jacobin orthodoxy, of which M. Aulard, professor at the Sorbonne,
+is to-day the high priest. The latter has devoted two years to
+writing a pamphlet against Taine, every line of which is steeped
+in passion. All this time spent in rectifying a few material
+errors which are not really significant has only resulted in the
+perpetration of the very same errors.
+
+Reviewing his work, M. A. Cochin shows that M. Aulard has at
+least on every other occasion been deceived by his quotations,
+whereas Taine erred far more rarely. The same historian shows
+also that we must not trust M. Aulard's sources.
+
+``These sources--proceedings, pamphlets, journals, and the
+speeches and writings of patriots--are precisely the authentic
+publications of patriotism, edited by patriots, and edited, as a
+rule, for the benefit of the public. He ought to have seen in
+all this simply the special pleading of the defendant: he had,
+before his eyes, a ready-made history of the Revolution, which
+presents, side by side with each of the acts of the `People,'
+from the massacres of September to the law of Prairial, a ready-
+made explanation according to the republican system of defence.''
+
+Perhaps the fairest criticism that one can make of the work of
+Taine is that it was left incomplete. He studied more especially
+the role of the populace and its leaders during the
+revolutionary period. This inspired him with pages vibrating
+with an indignation which we can still admire, but several
+important aspects of the Revolution escaped him.
+
+Whatever one may think of the Revolution, an irreducible
+difference will always exist between historians of the school of
+Taine and those of the school of M. Aulard. The latter regards
+the sovereign people as admirable, while the former shows us that
+when abandoned to its instincts and liberated from all social
+restraint it relapses into primitive savagery. The conception of
+M. Aulard, entirely contrary to the lessons of the psychology of
+crowds, is none the less a religious dogma in the eyes of modern
+Jacobins. They write of the Revolution according to the methods
+of believers, and take for learned works the arguments of virtual
+theologians.
+
+2. The Theory of Fatalism in respect of the Revolution.
+
+
+Advocates and detractors of the Revolution often admit the
+fatality of revolutionary events. This theory is well
+synthetised in the following passage from the History of the
+Revolution, by Emile Olivier:--
+
+``No man could oppose it. The blame belongs neither to those who
+perished nor to those who survived; there was no individual force
+capable of changing the elements and of foreseeing the events
+which were born of the nature of things and circumstances.''
+
+Taine himself inclines to this idea:--
+
+``At the moment when the States General were opened the course of
+ideas and events was not only determined but even visible. Each
+generation unwittingly bears within itself its future and its
+past; from the latter its destinies might have been foretold long
+before the issue.''
+
+Other modern authors, who profess no more indulgence for the
+violence of the revolutionaries than did Taine, are equally
+convinced of this fatality. M. Sorel, after recalling the saying
+of Bossuet concerning the revolutions of antiquity: ``Everything
+is surprising if we only consider particular causes, and yet
+everything goes forward in regular sequence,'' expresses an
+intention which he very imperfectly realises: ``to show in the
+Revolution, which seems to some the subversion and to others the
+regeneration of the old European world, the natural and necessary
+result of the history of Europe, and to show, moreover, that this
+revolution had no result--not even the most unexpected--that did
+not ensue from this history, and was not explained by the
+precedents of the ancien regime.''
+
+Guizot also had formerly attempted to prove that our Revolution,
+which he quite wrongly compared to that of England, was perfectly
+natural and effected no innovations:--
+
+``Far from having broken with the natural course of events in
+Europe, neither the English revolution nor our own did, intended,
+or said anything that had not been said, intended, and done a
+hundred years before its outbreak.
+
+`` . . . Whether we regard the general doctrines of the two
+revolutions or the application made of them--whether we deal with
+the government of the State or with the civil legislation, with
+property or with persons, with liberty or with power, we shall
+find nothing of which the invention can be attributed to them,
+nothing that will not be encountered elsewhere, or that was not
+at least originated in times which we qualify as normal.''
+
+All these assertions merely recall the banal law that a
+phenomenon is simply the consequence of previous phenomena. Such
+very general propositions do not teach us much.
+
+We must not try to explain too many events by the principle of
+fatality adopted by so many historians. I have elsewhere
+discussed the significance of such fatalities, and have shown
+that the whole effort of civilisation consists in trying to
+escape therefrom. Certainly history is full of necessities, but
+it is also full of contingent facts which were, and might not
+have been. Napoleon himself, on St. Helena, enumerated six
+circumstances which might have checked his prodigious career. He
+related, notably, that on taking a bath at Auxonne, in 1786, he
+only escaped death by the fortuitous presence of a sandbank. If
+Bonaparte had died, then we may admit that another general would
+have arisen, and might have become dictator. But what would have
+become of the Imperial epic and its consequences without
+the man of genius who led our victorious armies into all the
+capitals of Europe?
+
+It is permissible to consider the Revolution as being partly a
+necessity, but it was above all--which is what the fatalistic
+writers already cited do not show us--a permanent struggle
+between theorists who were imbued with a new ideal, and the
+economic, social, and political laws which ruled mankind, and
+which they did not understand. Not understanding them, they
+sought in vain to direct the course of events, were exasperated
+at their failure, and finally committed every species of
+violence. They decreed that the paper money known as assignats
+should be accepted as the equivalent of gold, and all their
+threats could not prevent the fictitious value of such money
+falling almost to nothing. They decreed the law of the maximum,
+and it merely increased the evils it was intended to remedy.
+Robespierre declared before the Convention ``that all the sans-
+culottes will be paid at the expense of the public treasury,
+which will be fed by the rich,'' and in spite of requisitions and
+the guillotine the treasury remained empty.
+
+Having broken all human restraints, the men of the Revolution
+finally discovered that a society cannot live without them; but
+when they sought to create them anew they saw that even the
+strongest society, though supported by the fear of the
+guillotine, could not replace the discipline which the past had
+slowly built up in the minds of men. As for understanding the
+evolution of society, or judging men's hearts and minds, or
+foreseeing the consequences of the laws they enacted, they
+scarcely attempted to do so.
+
+The events of the Revolution did not ensue from
+irreducible necessities. They were far more the consequence of
+Jacobin principles than of circumstances, and might have been
+quite other than they were. Would the Revolution have followed
+the same path if Louis XVI. had been better advised, or if the
+Constituent Assembly had been less cowardly in times of popular
+insurrection? The theory of revolutionary fatality is only
+useful to justify violence by presenting it as inevitable.
+
+Whether we are dealing with science or with history we must
+beware of the ignorance which takes shelter under the shibboleth
+of fatalism Nature was formerly full of a host of fatalities
+which science is slowly contriving to avoid. The function of the
+superior man is, as I have shown elsewhere, to avert such
+fatalities.
+
+
+3. The Hesitations of recent Historians of the Revolution.
+
+
+The historians whose ideas we have examined in the preceding
+chapter were extremely positive in their special pleading.
+Confined within the limits of belief, they did not attempt to
+penetrate the domain of knowledge. A monarchical writer was
+violently hostile to the Revolution, and a liberal writer was its
+violent apologist.
+
+At the present time we can see the commencement of a movement
+which will surely lead to the study of the Revolution as one of
+those scientific phenomena into which the opinions and beliefs of
+a writer enter so little that the reader does not even suspect
+them.
+
+This period has not yet come into being; we are still in the
+period of doubt. The liberal writers who used to be so positive
+are now so no longer. One may judge of this new state of
+mind by the following extracts from recent authors:--
+
+M. Hanotaux, having vaunted the utility of the Revolution, asks
+whether its results were not bought too dearly, and adds:--
+
+``History hesitates, and will, for a long time yet, hesitate to
+answer.''
+
+M. Madelin is equally dubious in the book he has recently
+published:--
+
+``I have never felt sufficient authority to form, even in my
+inmost conscience, a categorical judgment on so complex a
+phenomenon as the French Revolution. To-day I find it even more
+difficult to form a brief judgement. Causes, facts, and
+consequences seem to me to be still extremely debatable
+subjects.''
+
+One may obtain a still better idea of the transformation of the
+old ideas concerning the Revolution by perusing the latest
+writings of its official defenders. While they professed
+formerly to justify every act of violence by representing it as a
+simple act of defence, they now confine themselves to pleading
+extenuating circumstances. I find a striking proof of this new
+frame of mind in the history of France for the use of schools,
+published by MM. Aulard and Debidour. Concerning the Terror we
+read the following lines:--
+
+``Blood flowed in waves; there were acts of injustice and crimes
+which were useless from the point of view of national defence,
+and odious. But men had lost their heads in the tempest, and,
+harassed by a thousand dangers, the patriots struck out in their
+rage.''
+
+We shall see in another part of this work that the first of the
+two authors whom I have cited is, in spite of his
+uncompromising Jacobinism, by no means indulgent toward the men
+formerly qualified as the ``Giants of the Convention.''
+
+The judgments of foreigners upon our Revolution are usually
+distinctly severe, and we cannot be surprised when we remember
+how Europe suffered during the twenty years of upheaval in
+France.
+
+The Germans in particular have been most severe. Their opinion
+is summed up in the following lines by M. Faguet:--
+
+``Let us say it courageously and patriotically, for patriotism
+consists above all in telling the truth to one's own country:
+Germany sees in France, with regard to the past, a people who,
+with the great words `liberty' and `fraternity' in its mouth,
+oppressed, trampled, murdered, pillaged, and fleeced her for
+fifteen years; and with regard to the present, a people who, with
+the same words on its banners, is organising a despotic,
+oppressive, mischievous, and ruinous democracy, which none would
+seek to imitate. This is what Germany may well see in France;
+and this, according to her books and journals, is, we may assure
+ourselves, what she does see.''
+
+For the rest, whatever the worth of the verdicts pronounced upon
+the French Revolution, we may be certain that the writers of the
+future will consider it as an event as passionately interesting
+as it is instructive.
+
+A Government bloodthirsty enough to guillotine old men of eighty
+years, young girls, and little children: which covered France
+with ruins, and yet succeeded in repulsing Europe in arms; an
+archduchess of Austria, Queen of France, dying on the
+scaffold, and a few years later another archduchess, her
+relative, replacing her on the same throne and marrying a sub-
+lieutenant, turned Emperor--here are tragedies unique in human
+history. The psychologists, above all, will derive lessons from
+a history hitherto so little studied by them. No doubt they will
+finally discover that psychology can make no progress until it
+renounces chimerical theories and laboratory experiments in order
+to study the events and the men who surround us.[7]
+
+
+
+[7] This advice is far from being banal. The psychologists of
+the day pay very little attention to the world about them, and
+are even surprised that any one should study it. I have come
+across an interesting proof of this indifferent frame of mind in
+a review of one of my books which appeared in the Revue
+philosophique and was inspired by the editor of the review. The
+author reproaches me with ``exploring the world and the
+newspapers rather than books.''
+
+I most gladly accept this reproach. The manifold facts of the
+journals and the realities of the world are far more instructive
+than philosophical lucubrations such as the Revue is stuffed
+with.
+
+Philosophers are beginning to see the puerility of such
+reproaches. It was certainly of the forty volumes of this
+fastidious publication that Mr. William James was thinking when
+he wrote that all these dissertations simply represented ``a
+string of facts clumsily observed and a few quarrelsome
+discussions.'' Although he is the author of the best known
+treatise on psychology extant, the eminent thinker realises ``the
+fragility of a science that oozes metaphysical criticism at every
+joint.'' For more than twenty years I have tried to interest
+psychologists in the study of realities, but the stream of
+university metaphysics is hardly yet turned aside, although it
+has lost its former force
+
+
+
+4. Impartiality in History.
+
+
+Impartiality has always been considered as the most essential
+quality of the historian. All historians since Tacitus have
+assured us that they are impartial.
+
+In reality the writer sees events as the painter sees a
+landscape--that is, through his own temperament; through his
+character and the mind of the race.
+
+A number of artists, placed before the same landscape, would
+necessarily interpret it in as many different fashions. Some
+would lay stress upon details neglected by others. Each
+reproduction would thus be a personal work--that is to say, would
+be interpreted by a certain form of sensibility.
+
+It is the same with the writer. We can no more speak of the
+impartiality of the historian than we can speak of the
+impartiality of the painter.
+
+Certainly the historian may confine himself to the reproduction
+of documents, and this is the present tendency. But these
+documents, for periods as near us as the Revolution, are so
+abundant that a man's whole life would not suffice to go through
+them. Therefore the historian must make a choice.
+
+Consciously sometimes, but more often unconsciously, the author
+will select the material which best corresponds with his
+political, moral, and social opinions.
+
+It is therefore impossible, unless he contents himself with
+simple chronologies summing up each event with a few words and a
+date, to produce a truly impartial volume of history. No author
+could be impartial; and it is not to be regretted. The claim to
+impartiality, so common to-day, results in those flat, gloomy,
+and prodigiously wearisome works which render the comprehension
+of a period completely impossible.
+
+Should the historian, under a pretext of impartiality, abstain
+from judging men--that is, from speaking in tones of admiration
+or reprobation?
+
+This question, I admit, allows of two very different solutions,
+each of which is perfectly correct, according to the point of
+view assumed--that of the moralist or that of the psychologist.
+
+The moralist must think exclusively of the interest of society,
+and must judge men only according to that interest. By the very
+fact that it exists and wishes to continue to exist a society is
+obliged to admit a certain number of rules, to have an
+indestructible standard of good and evil, and consequently to
+create very definite distinctions between vice and virtue. It
+thus finally creates average types, to which the man of the
+period approaches more or less closely, and from which he cannot
+depart very widely without peril to society.
+
+It is by such similar types and the rules derived from social
+necessities that the moralist must judge the men of the past.
+Praising those which were useful and blaming the rest, he thus
+helps to form the moral types which are indispensable to the
+progress of civilisation and which may serve others as models.
+Poets such as Corneille, for example, create heroes superior to
+the majority of men, and possibly inimitable; but they thereby
+help greatly to stimulate our efforts. The example of heroes
+must always be set before a people in order to ennoble its mind.
+
+Such is the moralist's point of view. That of the psychologist
+would be quite different. While a society has no right to be
+tolerant, because its first duty is to live, the psychologist may
+remain indifferent. Considering things as a scientist, he no
+longer asks their utilitarian value, but seeks merely to explain
+them.
+
+His situation is that of the observer before any phenomenon. It
+is obviously difficult to read in cold blood that Carrier ordered
+his victims to be buried up to the neck so that they might then
+be blinded and subjected to horrible torments. Yet if we wish to
+comprehend such acts we must be no more indignant than the
+naturalist before the spider slowly devouring a fly. As soon as
+the reason is moved it is no longer reason, and can explain
+nothing.
+
+The functions of the historian and the psychologist are not, as
+we see, identical, but of both we may demand the endeavour, by a
+wise interpretation of the facts, to discover, under the visible
+evidences, the invisible forces which determine them.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER II
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE ANCIEN REGIME
+
+1. The Absolute Monarchy and the Bases of the Ancien Regime.
+
+Many historians assure us that the Revolution was directed
+against the autocracy of the monarchy. In reality the kings of
+France had ceased to be absolute monarchs long before its
+outbreak.
+
+Only very late in history--not until the reign of Louis XIV.--did
+they finally obtain incontestable power. All the preceding
+sovereigns, even the most powerful, such as Francis I., for
+example, had to sustain a constant struggle either against the
+seigneurs, or the clergy, or the parliaments, and they did not
+always win. Francis himself had not sufficient power to protect
+his most intimate friends against the Sorbonne and the
+Parliament. His friend and councillor Berquin, having offended
+the Sorbonne, was arrested upon the order of the latter body.
+The king ordered his release, which was refused. He was obliged
+to send archers to remove him from the Conciergerie, and could
+find no other means of protecting him than that of keeping him
+beside him in the Louvre. The Sorbonne by no means considered
+itself beaten. Profiting by the king's absence, it
+arrested Berquin again and had him tried by Parliament.
+Condemned at ten in the morning, he was burned alive at noon.
+
+Built up very gradually, the power of the kings of France was not
+absolute until the time of Louis XIV. It then rapidly declined,
+and it would be truly difficult to speak of the absolutism of
+Louis XVI.
+
+This pretended master was the slave of his court, his ministers,
+the clergy, and the nobles. He did what they forced him to do
+and rarely what he wished. Perhaps no Frenchman was so little
+free as the king.
+
+The great power of the monarchy resided originally in the Divine
+origin which was attributed to it, and in the traditions which
+had accumulated during the ages. These formed the real social
+framework of the country.
+
+The true cause of the disappearance of the ancien regime was
+simply the weakening of the traditions which served as its
+foundations. When after repeated criticism it could find no more
+defenders, the ancien regime crumbled like a building whose
+foundations have been destroyed.
+
+
+2. The Inconveniences of the Ancien Regime
+
+
+A long-established system of government will always finally seem
+acceptable to the people governed. Habit masks its
+inconveniences, which appear only when men begin to think. Then
+they ask how they could ever have supported them. The truly
+unhappy man is the man who believes himself miserable.
+
+It was precisely this belief which was gaining ground at the time
+of the Revolution, under the influence of the writers whose work
+we shall presently study. Then the imperfections of the
+ancien regime stared all men in the face. They were
+numerous; it is enough to mention a few.
+
+Despite the apparent authority of the central power, the kingdom,
+formed by the successive conquest of independent provinces, was
+divided into territories each of which had its own laws and
+customs, and each of which paid different imposts. Internal
+customs-houses separated them. The unity of France was thus
+somewhat artificial. It represented an aggregate of various
+countries which the repeated efforts of the kings, including
+Louis XIV., had not succeeded in wholly unifying. The most
+useful effect of the Revolution was this very unification.
+
+To such material divisions were added social divisions
+constituted by different classes--nobles, clergy, and the Third
+Estate, whose rigid barriers could only with the utmost
+difficulty be crossed.
+
+Regarding the division of the classes as one of its sources of
+power, the ancien regime had rigorously maintained that
+division. This became the principal cause of the hatreds which
+the system inspired. Much of the violence of the triumphant
+bourgeoisie represented vengeance for a long past of disdain
+and oppression. The wounds of self-love are the most difficult
+of all to forget. The Third Estate had suffered many such
+wounds. At a meeting of the States General in 1614, at which its
+representatives were obliged to remain bareheaded on their knees,
+one member of the Third Estate having dared to say that the three
+orders were like three brothers, the spokesman of the nobles
+replied ``that there was no fraternity between it and the Third;
+that the nobles did not wish the children of cobblers and
+tanners to call them their brothers.''
+
+Despite the march of enlightenment the nobles and the clergy
+obstinately preserved their privileges and their demands, no
+longer justifiable now that these classes had ceased to render
+services.
+
+Kept from the exercise of public functions by the royal power,
+which distrusted them, and progressively replaced by a
+bourgeoisie which was more and more learned and capable, the
+social role of nobility and clergy was only an empty show.
+This point has been luminously expounded by Taine:--
+
+``Since the nobility, having lost its special capacity, and the
+Third Estate, having acquired general capacity, were now on a
+level in respect of education and aptitudes, the inequality which
+divided them had become hurtful and useless. Instituted by
+custom, it was no longer ratified by the consciousness, and the
+Third Estate was with reason angered by privileges which nothing
+justified, neither the capacity of the nobles nor the incapacity
+of the bourgeoisie.''
+
+By reason of the rigidity of castes established by a long past we
+cannot see what could have persuaded the nobles and the clergy to
+renounce their privileges. Certainly they did finally abandon
+them one memorable evening, when events forced them to do so; but
+then it was too late, and the Revolution, unchained, was pursuing
+its course.
+
+It is certain that modern progress would successively have
+established all that the Revolution effected--the equality of
+citizens before the law, the suppression of the privileges of
+birth, &c. Despite the conservative spirit of the Latins, these
+things would have been won, as they were by the majority
+of the peoples. We might in this manner have been saved twenty
+years of warfare and devastation; but we must have had a
+different mental constitution, and, above all, different
+statesmen.
+
+The profound hostility of the bourgeoisie against the classes
+maintained above it by tradition was one of the great factors of
+the Revolution, and perfectly explains why, after its triumph,
+the first class despoiled the vanquished of their wealth. They
+behaved as conquerors--like William the Conqueror, who, after the
+conquest of England, distributed the soil among his soldiers.
+
+But although the bourgeoisie detested the nobility they had no
+hatred for royalty, and did not regard it as revocable. The
+maladdress of the king and his appeals to foreign powers only
+very gradually made him unpopular.
+
+The first Assembly never dreamed of founding a republic.
+Extremely royalist, in fact, it thought simply to substitute a
+constitutional for an absolute monarchy. Only the consciousness
+of its increasing power exasperated it against the resistance of
+the king; but it dared not overthrow him.
+
+
+3. Life under the Ancien Regime.
+
+
+It is difficult to form a very clear idea of life under the
+ancien regime, and, above all, of the real situation of the
+peasants.
+
+The writers who defend the Revolution as theologians defend
+religious dogmas draw such gloomy pictures of the existence of
+the peasants under the ancien regime that we ask ourselves
+how it was that all these unhappy creatures had not died
+of hunger long before. A good example of this style of writing
+may be found in a book by M. A. Rambaud, formerly professor at
+the Sorbonne, published under the title History of the French
+Revolution. One notices especially an engraving bearing the
+legend, Poverty of Peasants under Louis XIV. In the foreground
+a man is fighting some dogs for some bones, which for that matter
+are already quite fleshless. Beside him a wretched fellow is
+twisting himself and compressing his stomach. Farther back a
+woman lying on the ground is eating grass. At the back of the
+landscape figures of which one cannot say whether they are
+corpses or persons starving are also stretched on the soil. As
+an example of the administration of the ancien regime the
+same author assures us that ``a place in the police cost 300
+livres and brought in 400,000.'' Such figures surely indicate a
+great disinterestedness on the part of those who sold such
+productive employment! He also informs us ``that it cost only
+120 livres to get people arrested,'' and that ``under Louis XV.
+more than 150,000 lettres de cachet were distributed.''
+
+The majority of books dealing with the Revolution are conceived
+with as little impartiality and critical spirit, which is one
+reason why this period is really so little known to us.
+
+Certainly there is no lack of documents, but they are absolutely
+contradictory. To the celebrated description of La Bruyere we
+may oppose the enthusiastic picture drawn by the English
+traveller Young of the prosperous condition of the peasants of
+some of the French provinces.
+
+Were they really crushed by taxation, and did they, as has been
+stated, pay four-fifths of their revenue instead of a fifth as
+to-day? Impossible to say with certainty. One capital fact,
+however, seems to prove that under the ancien regime the
+situation of the inhabitants of the rural districts could not
+have been so very wretched, since it seems established that more
+than a third of the soil had been bought by peasants.
+
+We are better informed as to the financial system. It was very
+oppressive and extremely complicated. The budgets usually showed
+deficits, and the imposts of all kinds were raised by tyrannical
+farmers-general. At the very moment of the Revolution this
+condition of the finances became the cause of universal
+discontent, which is expressed in the cahiers of the States
+General. Let us remark that these cahiers did not represent a
+previous state of affairs, but an actual condition due to a
+crisis of poverty produced by the bad harvest of 1788 and the
+hard winter of 1789. What would these cahiers have told us had
+they been written ten years earlier?
+
+Despite these unfavourable circumstances the cahiers contained
+no revolutionary ideas. The most advanced merely asked that
+taxes should be imposed only with the consent of the States
+General and paid by all alike. The same cahiers sometimes
+expressed a wish that the power of the king should be limited by
+a Constitution defining his rights and those of the nation. If
+these wishes had been granted a constitutional monarchy could
+very easily have been substituted for the absolute monarchy, and
+the Revolution would probably have been avoided.
+
+Unhappily, the nobility and the clergy were too strong and Louis
+XVI. too weak for such a solution to be possible.
+
+Moreover, it would have been rendered extremely difficult by the
+demands of the bourgeoisie, who claimed to substitute themselves
+for the nobles, and were the real authors of the Revolution. The
+movement started by the middle classes rapidly exceeded their
+hopes, needs, and aspirations. They had claimed equality for
+their own profit, but the people also demanded equality. The
+Revolution thus finally became the popular government which it
+was not and had no intention of becoming at the outset.
+
+
+4. Evolution of Monarchical Feeling during the Revolution.
+
+
+Despite the slow evolution of the affective elements, it is
+certain that during the Revolution the sentiments, not of the
+people only, but also of the revolutionary Assemblies with regard
+to the monarchy, underwent a very rapid change. Between the
+moment when the legislators of the first Assembly surrounded
+Louis XVI. with respect and the moment when his head was cut off
+a very few years had elapsed.
+
+These changes, superficial rather than profound, were in reality
+a mere transposition of sentiments of the same order. The love
+which the men of this period professed for the king was
+transferred to the new Government which had inherited his power.
+The mechanism of such a transfer may easily be demonstrated.
+
+Under the ancien regime, the sovereign, holding his power by
+Divine right, was for this reason invested with a kind of
+supernatural power. His people looked up to him from every
+corner of the country.
+
+This mystic belief in the absolute power of royalty was shattered
+only when repeated experience proved that the power attributed to
+the adored being was fictitious. He then lost his prestige.
+Now, when prestige is lost the crowd will not forgive the fallen
+idol for deluding them, and seek anew the idol without which they
+cannot exist.
+
+From the outset of the Revolution numerous facts, which were
+daily repeated, revealed to the most fervent believers the fact
+that royalty no longer possessed any power, and that there were
+other powers capable, not only of contending with royalty, but
+possessed of superior force.
+
+What, for instance, was thought of the royal power by the
+multitudes who saw the king held in check by the Assembly, and
+incapable, in the heart of Paris, of defending his strongest
+fortress against the attacks of armed bands?
+
+The royal weakness thus being obvious, the power of the Assembly
+was increasing. Now, in the eyes of the crowd weakness has no
+prestige; it turns always to force.
+
+In the Assemblies feeling was very fluid, but did not evolve very
+rapidly, for which reason the monarchical faith survived the
+taking of the Bastille the flight of the king, and his
+understanding with foreign sovereigns.
+
+The royalist faith was still so powerful that the Parisian riots
+and the events which led to the execution of Louis XVI. were not
+enough finally to destroy, in the provinces, the species
+of secular piety which enveloped the old monarchy.[8]
+
+
+
+[8] As an instance of the depth of this hereditary love of the
+people for its kings, Michelet relates the following fact, which
+occurred in the reign of Louis XV.: ``When it was known in Paris
+that Louis XV., who had left for the army, was detained ill at
+Metz, it was night. People got up and ran tumultuously hither
+and thither without knowing where they were going; the churches
+were opened in the middle of the night . . . people assembled at
+every cross-road, jostling and questioning one another without
+knowing what they were after. In several churches the priest who
+was reciting the prayer for the king's health was stopped by his
+tears, and the people replied by sobs and cries. . . . The
+courier who brought the news of his convalescence was embraced
+and almost stifled; people kissed his horse, and led him in
+triumph. . . . Every street resounded with a cry of joy: `The
+king is healed.' ''
+
+
+
+
+It persisted in a great part of France during the whole of the
+Revolution, and was the origin of the royalist conspiracies and
+insurrections in various departments which the Convention had
+such trouble to suppress. The royalist faith had disappeared in
+Paris, where the weakness of the king was too plainly visible;
+but in the provinces the royal power, representing God on earth,
+still retained its prestige.
+
+The royalist sentiments of the people must have been deeply
+rooted to survive the guillotine. The royalist movements
+persisted, indeed, during the whole of the Revolution, and were
+accentuated under the Directory, when forty-nine departments sent
+royalist deputies to Paris, which provoked the Directory to the
+coup d'etat of Fructidor.
+
+This monarchical-feeling, with difficulty repressed by the
+Revolution, contributed to the success of Bonaparte when he came
+to occupy the throne of the ancient kings, and in great measure
+to re-establish the ancien regime.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER III
+
+MENTAL ANARCHY AT THE TIME OF THE REVOLUTION AND THE INFLUENCE
+ATTRIBUTED TO THE PHILOSOPHERS
+
+1. Origin and Propagation of Revolutionary Ideas.
+
+The outward life of men in every age is moulded upon an inward
+life consisting of a framework of traditions, sentiments, and
+moral influences which direct their conduct and maintain certain
+fundamental notions which they accept without discussion.
+
+Let the resistance of this social framework weaken, and ideas
+which could have had no force before will germinate and develop.
+Certain theories whose success was enormous at the time of the
+Revolution would have encountered an impregnable wall two
+centuries earlier.
+
+The aim of these considerations is to recall to the reader the
+fact that the outward events of revolutions are always a
+consequence of invisible transformations which have slowly gone
+forward in men's minds. Any profound study of a revolution
+necessitates a study of the mental soil upon which the ideas that
+direct its course have to germinate.
+
+Generally slow in the extreme, the evolution of ideas is often
+invisible for a whole generation. Its extent can only be grasped
+by comparing the mental condition of the same social
+classes at the two extremities of the curve which the mind has
+followed. To realise the different conceptions of royalty
+entertained by educated men under Louis XIV. and Louis XVI., we
+must compare the political theories of Bossuet and Turgot.
+
+Bossuet expressed the general conceptions of his time concerning
+the absolute monarchy when he based the authority of a Government
+upon the will of God, ``sole judge of the actions of kings,
+always irresponsible before men.'' Religious faith was then as
+strong as the monarchical faith from which it seemed inseparable,
+and no philosopher could have shaken it.
+
+The writings of the reforming ministers of Louis XVI., those of
+Turgot, for instance, are animated by quite another spirit. Of
+the Divine right of kings there is hardly a word, and the rights
+of the peoples begin to be clearly defined.
+
+Many events had contributed to prepare for such an evolution--
+unfortunate wars, famines, imposts, general poverty at the end of
+the reign of Louis XV., &c. Slowly destroyed, respect for
+monarchical authority was replaced by a mental revolt which was
+ready to manifest itself as soon as occasion should arise.
+
+When once the mental framework commences to crumble the end comes
+rapidly. This is why at the time of the Revolution ideas were so
+quickly propagated which were by no means new, but which until
+then had exerted no influence, as they had not fallen on fruitful
+ground.
+
+Yet the ideas which were then so attractive and effectual had
+often been expressed. For a long time they had inspired the
+politics of England. Two thousand years earlier the Greek and
+Latin authors had written in defence of liberty, had
+cursed tyrants, and proclaimed the rights of popular sovereignty.
+
+The middle classes who effected the Revolution, although, like
+their fathers, they had learned all these things in text-books,
+were not in any degree moved by them, because the moment when
+such ideas could move them had not arrived. How should the
+people have been impressed by them at a time when all men were
+accustomed to regard all hierarchies as natural necessities?
+
+The actual influence of the philosophers in the genesis of the
+Revolution was not that which was attributed to them. They
+revealed nothing new, but they developed the critical spirit
+which no dogma can resist once the way is prepared for its
+downfall.
+
+Under the influence of this developing critical spirit things
+which were no longer very greatly respected came to be respected
+less and less. When tradition and prestige had disappeared the
+social edifice suddenly fell.
+
+This progressive disaggregation finally descended to the people,
+but was not commenced by the people. The people follows
+examples, but never sets them.
+
+The philosophers, who could not have exerted any influence over
+the people, did exert a great influence over the enlightened
+portion of the nation. The unemployed nobility, who had long
+been ousted from their old functions, and who were consequently
+inclined to be censorious, followed their leadership. Incapable
+of foresight, the nobles were the first to break with the
+traditions that were their only raison d'etre. As steeped
+in humanitarianism and rationalism as the bourgeoisie of to-
+day, they continually sapped their own privileges by their
+criticisms. As to-day, the most ardent reformers were found
+among the favourites of fortune. The aristocracy encouraged
+dissertations on the social contract, the rights of man, and the
+equality of citizens. At the theatre it applauded plays which
+criticised privileges, the arbitrariness and the incapacity of
+men in high places, and abuses of all kinds.
+
+As soon as men lose confidence in the foundations of the mental
+framework which guides their conduct they feel at first uneasy
+and then discontented. All classes felt their old motives of
+action gradually disappearing. Things that had seemed sacred for
+centuries were now sacred no longer.
+
+The censorious spirit of the nobility and of the writers of the
+day would not have sufficed to move the heavy load of tradition,
+but that its action was added to that of other powerful
+influences. We have already stated, in citing Bossuet, that
+under the ancien regime the religious and civil governments,
+widely separated in our days, were intimately connected. To
+injure one was inevitably to injure the other. Now, even before
+the monarchical idea was shaken the force of religious tradition
+was greatly diminished among cultivated men. The constant
+progress of knowledge had sent an increasing number of minds from
+theology to science by opposing the truth observed to the truth
+revealed.
+
+This mental evolution, although as yet very vague, was sufficient
+to show that the traditions which for so many centuries had
+guided men had not the value which had been attributed to them,
+and that it would soon be necessary to replace them.
+
+But where discover the new elements which might; take the place
+of tradition? Where seek the magic ring which would raise a new
+social edifice on the remains of that which no longer contented
+men?
+
+Men were agreed in attributing to reason the power that tradition
+and the gods seemed to have lost. How could its force be
+doubted? Its discoveries having been innumerable, was it not
+legitimate to suppose that by applying it to the construction of
+societies it would entirely transform them? Its possible
+function increased very rapidly in the thoughts of the more
+enlightened, in proportion as tradition seemed more and more to
+be distrusted.
+
+The sovereign power attributed to reason must be regarded as the
+culminating idea which not only engendered the Revolution but
+governed it throughout. During the whole Revolution men gave
+themselves up to the most persevering efforts to break with the
+past, and to erect society upon a new plan dictated by logic.
+
+Slowly filtering downward, the rationalistic theories of the
+philosophers meant to the people simply that all the things which
+had been regarded as worthy of respect were now no longer worthy.
+
+Men being declared equal, the old masters need no longer be
+obeyed.
+
+The multitude easily succeeded in ceasing to respect what the
+upper classes themselves no longer respected. When the barrier
+of respect was down the Revolution was accomplished.
+
+The first result of this new mentality was a general
+insubordination. Mme. Vigee Lebrun relates that on the
+promenade at Longchamps men of the people leaped on the
+footboards of the carriages, saying, ``Next year you will be
+behind and we shall be inside.''
+
+The populace was not alone in manifesting insubordination and
+discontent. These sentiments were general on the eve of the
+Revolution. ``The lesser clergy,'' says Taine, ``are hostile to
+the prelates; the provincial gentry to the nobility of the court;
+the vassals to the seigneurs; the peasants to the townsmen,'' &c.
+
+This state of mind, which had been communicated from the nobles
+and clergy to the people, also invaded the army. At the moment
+the States General were opened Necker said: ``We are not sure of
+the troops.'' The officers were becoming humanitarian and
+philosophical. The soldiers, recruited from the lowest class of
+the population, did not philosophise, but they no longer obeyed.
+
+In their feeble minds the ideas of equality meant simply the
+suppression of all leaders and masters, and therefore of all
+obedience. In 1790 more than twenty regiments threatened their
+officers, and sometimes, as at Nancy, threw them into prison.
+
+The mental anarchy which, after spreading through all the classes
+of society, finally invaded the army was the principal cause of
+the disappearance of the ancien regime. ``It was the
+defection of the army affected by the ideas of the Third
+Estate,'' wrote Rivarol, ``that destroyed royalty.''
+
+
+2. The supposed Influence of the Philosophers of the Eighteenth
+Century upon the Genesis of the Revolution--Their dislike of
+Democracy.
+
+
+Although the philosophers who have been supposed the inspirers of
+the French Revolution did attack certain privileges and
+abuses, we must not for that reason regard them as partisans of
+popular government. Democracy, whose role in Greek history
+was familiar to them, was generally highly antipathetic to them.
+They were not ignorant of the destruction and violence which are
+its invariable accompaniments, and knew that in the time of
+Aristotle it was already defined as ``a State in which
+everything, even the law, depends on the multitude set up as a
+tyrant and governed by a few declamatory speakers.''
+
+Pierre Bayle, the true forerunner of Voltaire, recalled in the
+following terms the consequences of popular government in
+Athens:--
+
+``If one considers this history, which displays at great length
+the tumult of the assemblies, the factions dividing the city, the
+seditious disturbing it, the most illustrious subjects
+persecuted, exiled, and punished by death at the will of a
+violent windbag, one would conclude that this people, which so
+prided itself on its liberty, was really the slave of a small
+number of caballers, whom they called demagogues, and who made it
+turn now in this direction, now in that, as their passions
+changed, almost as the sea heaps the waves now one way, now
+another, according to the winds which trouble it. You will seek
+in vain in Macedonia, which was a monarchy, for as many examples
+of tyranny as Athenian history will afford.''
+
+Montesquieu had no greater admiration for the democracy. Having
+described the three forms of government--republican, monarchical,
+and despotic--he shows very clearly what popular government may
+lead to:--
+
+``Men were free with laws; men would fain be free without
+them; what was a maxim is called severity; what was order is
+called hindrance. Formerly the welfare of individuals
+constituted the public wealth, but now the public wealth becomes
+the patrimony of individuals. The republic is spoil, and its
+strength is merely the power of a few citizens and the licence of
+all.''
+
+``. . . Little petty tyrants spring up who have all the vices of
+a single tyrant. Very soon what is left of liberty becomes
+untenable; a single tyrant arises, and the people loses all, even
+the advantages of corruption.
+
+``Democracy has therefore two extremes to avoid; the extreme of
+the spirit of equality leads to the despotism of a single person,
+as the despotism of a single person leads to conquest.''
+
+The ideal of Montesquieu was the English constitutional
+government, which prevented the monarchy from degenerating into
+despotism. Otherwise the influence of this philosopher at the
+moment of the Revolution was very slight.
+
+As for the Encyclopaedists, to whom such a considerable
+role is attributed, they hardly dealt with politics,
+excepting d'Holbach, a liberal monarchist like Voltaire and
+Diderot. They wrote chiefly in defence of individual liberty,
+opposing the encroachments of the Church, at that time extremely
+intolerant and inimical to philosophers. Being neither
+Socialists nor democrats, the Revolution could not utilise any of
+their principles.
+
+Voltaire himself was by no means a partisan of democracy.
+
+``Democracy,'' he said, ``seems only to suit a very small
+country, and even then it must be fortunately situated.
+Little as it may be, it will make many mistakes, because it will
+be composed of men. Discord will prevail there as in a convent
+full of monks; but there will be no St. Bartholomew's day, no
+Irish massacres, no Sicilian Vespers, no Inquisition, no
+condemnation to the galleys for having taken water from the sea
+without paying for it; unless we suppose this republic to be
+composed of devils in a corner of hell.''
+
+All these men who are supposed to have inspired the Revolution
+had opinions which were far from subversive, and it is really
+difficult to see that they had any real influence on the
+development of the revolutionary movement. Rousseau was one of
+the very few democratic philosophers of his age, which is why his
+Contrat Social became the Bible of the men of the Terror. It
+seemed to furnish the rational justification necessary to excuse
+the acts deriving from unconscious mystic and affective impulses
+which no philosophy had inspired.
+
+To be quite truthful, the democratic instincts of Rousseau were
+by no means above suspicion. He himself considered that his
+projects for social reorganisation, based upon popular
+sovereignty, could be applied only to a very small State; and
+when the Poles asked him for a draft democratic Constitution he
+advised them to choose a hereditary monarch.
+
+Among the theories of Rousseau that relating to the perfection of
+the primitive social state had a great success. He asserted,
+together with various writers of his time, that primitive mankind
+was perfect; it was corrupted only by society. By modifying
+society by means of good laws one might bring back the
+happiness of the early world. Ignorant of all psychology, he
+believed that men were the same throughout time and space and
+that they could all be ruled by the same laws and institutions.
+This was then the general belief. ``The vices and virtues of the
+people,'' wrote Helvetius, ``are always a necessary effect of its
+legislation. . . . How can we doubt that virtue is in the case
+of all peoples the result of the wisdom, more or less perfect, of
+the administration?''
+
+There could be no greater mistake.
+
+
+3. The Philosophical Ideas of the Bourgeoisie at the Time of
+the Revolution.
+
+
+It is by no means easy to say just what were the social and
+political conceptions of a Frenchman of the middle classes at the
+moment of the Revolution. They might be reduced to a few
+formulae concerning fraternity, equality, and popular
+government, summed up in the celebrated Declaration of the Rights
+of Man, of which we shall have occasion to quote a few passages.
+
+The philosophers of the eighteenth century do not seem to have
+been very highly rated by the men of the Revolution. Rarely are
+they quoted in the speeches of the time. Hypnotised by their
+classical memories of Greece and Rome, the new legislators re-
+read their Plato and their Plutarch. They wished to revive the
+constitution of Sparta, with its manners, its frugal habits, and
+its laws.
+
+Lycurgus, Solon, Miltiades, Manlius Torquatus, Brutus, Mucius
+Scaevola, even the fabulous Minos himself, became as familiar
+in the tribune as in the theatre, and the public went crazy over
+them. The shades of the heroes of antiquity hovered over
+the revolutionary assemblies. Posterity alone has replaced them
+by the shades of the philosophers of the eighteenth century.
+
+We shall see that in reality the men of this period, generally
+represented as bold innovators guided by subtle philosophers,
+professed to effect no innovations whatever, but to return to a
+past long buried in the mists of history, and which, moreover,
+they scarcely ever in the least understood.
+
+The more reasonable, who did not go so far back for their models,
+aimed merely at adopting the English constitutional system, of
+which Montesquieu and Voltaire had sung the praises, and which
+all nations were finally to imitate without violent crises.
+
+Their ambitions were confined to a desire to perfect the existing
+monarchy, not to overthrow it. But in time of revolution men
+often take a very different path from that they propose to take.
+At the time of the convocation of the States General no one would
+ever have supposed that a revolution of peaceful bourgeoisie
+and men of letters would rapidly be transformed into one of the
+most sanguinary dictatorships of history.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER IV
+
+PSYCHOLOGICAL ILLUSIONS RESPECTING THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
+
+1. Illusions respecting Primitive Man, the Return to a State of
+Nature, and the Psychology of the People.
+
+We have already repeated, and shall again repeat, that the errors
+of a doctrine do not hinder its propagation, so that all we have
+to consider here is its influence upon men's minds.
+
+But although the criticism of erroneous doctrines is seldom of
+practical utility, it is extremely interesting from a
+psychological point of view. The philosopher who wishes to
+understand the working of men's minds should always carefully
+consider the illusions which they live with. Never, perhaps, in
+the course of history have these illusions appeared so profound
+and so numerous as during the Revolution.
+
+One of the most prominent was the singular conception of the
+nature of our first ancestors and primitive societies.
+Anthropology not having as yet revealed the conditions of our
+remoter forbears, men supposed, being influenced by the legends
+of the Bible, that man had issued perfect from the hands of the
+Creator. The first societies were models which were afterwards
+ruined by civilisation, but to which mankind must return.
+The return to the state of nature was very soon the general cry.
+``The fundamental principle of all morality, of which I have
+treated in my writings,'' said Rousseau, ``is that man is a being
+naturally good, loving justice and order.''
+
+Modern science, by determining, from the surviving remnants, the
+conditions of life of our first ancestors, has long ago shown the
+error of this doctrine. Primitive man has become an ignorant and
+ferocious brute, as ignorant as the modern savage of goodness,
+morality, and pity. Governed only by his instinctive impulses,
+he throws himself on his prey when hunger drives him from his
+cave, and falls upon his enemy the moment he is aroused by
+hatred. Reason, not being born, could have no hold over his
+instincts.
+
+The aim of civilisation, contrary to all revolutionary beliefs,
+has been not to return to the state of nature but to escape from
+it. It was precisely because the Jacobins led mankind back to
+the primitive condition by destroying all the social restraints
+without which no civilisation can exist that they transformed a
+political society into a barbarian horde.
+
+The ideas of these theorists concerning the nature of man were
+about as valuable as those of a Roman general concerning the
+power of omens. Yet their influence as motives of action was
+considerable. The Convention was always inspired by such ideas.
+
+The errors concerning our primitive ancestors were excusable
+enough, since before modern discoveries had shown us the real
+conditions of their existence these were absolutely unknown. But
+the absolute ignorance of human psychology displayed by the men
+of the Revolution is far less easy to understand.
+
+It would really seem as though the philosophers and writers of
+the eighteenth century must have been totally deficient in the
+smallest faculty of observation. They lived amidst their
+contemporaries without seeing them and without understanding
+them. Above all, they had not a suspicion of the true nature of
+the popular mind. The man of the people always appeared to them
+in the likeness of the chimerical model created by their dreams.
+As ignorant of psychology as of the teachings of history, they
+considered the plebeian man as naturally good, affectionate,
+grateful, and always ready to listen to reason.
+
+The speeches delivered by members of the Assembly show how
+profound were these illusions. When the peasants began to burn
+the chateaux they were greatly astonished, and addressed
+them in sentimental harangues, praying them to cease, in order
+not to ``give pain to their good king,'' and adjured them ``to
+surprise him by their virtues.''
+
+
+2. Illusions respecting the Possibility of separating Man from
+his Past and the Power of Transformation attributed to the Law.
+
+
+One of the principles which served as a foundation for the
+revolutionary institutions was that man may readily be cut off
+from his past, and that a society may be re-made in all its parts
+by means of institutions. Persuaded in the light of reason that,
+except for the primitive ages which were to serve as models, the
+past represented an inheritance of errors and superstitions, the
+legislators of the day resolved to break entirely with that past.
+
+The better to emphasise their intention, they founded a
+new era, transformed the calendar, and changed the names of the
+months and seasons.
+
+Supposing all men to be alike, they thought they could legislate
+for the human race. Condorcet imagined that he was expressing an
+evident truth when he said: ``A good law must be good for all
+men, just as a geometrical proposition is true for all.''
+
+The theorists of the Revolution never perceived, behind the world
+of visible things, the secret springs which moved them. A
+century of biological progress was needed to show how grievous
+were their mistakes, and how wholly a being of whatever species
+depends on its past.
+
+With the influence of the past, the reformers of the Revolution
+were always clashing, without ever understanding it. They wanted
+to annihilate it, but were annihilated by it instead.
+
+The faith of law-makers in the absolute power of laws and
+institutions, rudely shaken by the end of the Revolution, was
+absolute at its outbreak. Gregoire said from the tribune of
+the Constituent Assembly, without provoking the least
+astonishment: ``We could if we would change religion, but we do
+not want to.'' We know that they did want to later, and we know
+how miserably their attempt failed.
+
+Yet the Jacobins had in their hands all the elements of success.
+Thanks to the completest of tyrannies, all obstacles were
+removed, and the laws which it pleased them to impose were always
+accepted. After ten years of violence, of destruction and
+burning and pillage and massacre and general upheaval,
+their impotence was revealed so startlingly that they fell into
+universal reprobation. The dictator then invoked by the whole of
+France was obliged to re-establish the greater part of that which
+had been destroyed.
+
+The attempt of the Jacobins to re-fashion society in the name of
+pure reason constitutes an experiment of the highest interest.
+Probably mankind will never have occasion to repeat it on so vast
+a scale.
+
+Although the lesson was a terrible one, it does not seem to have
+been sufficient for a considerable class of minds, since even in
+our days we hear Socialists propose to rebuild society from top
+to bottom according to their chimerical plans.
+
+
+3. Illusions respecting the Theoretical Value of the great
+Revolutionary Principles.
+
+The fundamental principles on which the Revolution was based in
+order to create a new dispensation are contained in the
+Declarations of Rights which were formulated successively in
+1789, 1793, and 1795. All three Declarations agree in
+proclaiming that ``the principle of sovereignty resides in the
+nation.''
+
+For the rest, the three Declarations differ on several points,
+notably in the matter of equality. That of 1789 simply states
+(Article 1): ``Men are born and remain free and having equal
+rights.'' That of 1793 goes farther, and assures us (Article 3):
+
+``All men are equal by nature.'' That of 1795 is more modest and
+says (Article 3): ``Equality consists in the law being the same
+for all.'' Besides this, having mentioned rights, the third
+Declaration considers it useful to speak of duties. Its
+morality is simply that of the Gospel. Article 2 says: ``All
+the duties of a man and a citizen derive from these two
+principles engraved on all hearts by nature: do not do unto
+others that which you would not they should do unto you; do
+constantly unto others the good you would wish to receive from
+them.''
+
+The essential portions of these proclamations, the only portions
+which have really survived, were those relating to equality and
+popular sovereignty.
+
+Despite the weakness of its rational meaning, the part played by
+the Republican device, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, was
+considerable.
+
+This magic formula, which is still left engraven on many of our
+walls until it shall be engraven on our hearts, has really
+possessed the supernatural power attributed to certain words by
+the old sorcerers.
+
+Thanks to the new hopes excited by its promises, its power of
+expansion was considerable. Thousands of men lost their lives
+for it. Even in our days, when a revolution breaks out in any
+part of the world, the same formula is always invoked.
+
+Its choice was happy in the extreme. It belongs to the category
+of indefinite dream-evoking sentences, which every one is free to
+interpret according to his own desires, hatreds, and hopes. In
+matters of faith the real sense of words matters very little; it
+is the meaning attached to them that makes their importance.
+
+Of the three principles of the revolutionary device, equality was
+most fruitful of consequences. We shall see in another part of
+this book that it is almost the only one which still
+survives, and is still productive of effects.
+
+It was certainly not the Revolution that introduced the idea of
+equality into the world. Without going back even to the Greek
+republics, we may remark that the theory of equality was taught
+in the clearest fashion by Christianity and Islamism. All men,
+subjects of the one God, were equal before Him, and judged solely
+according to their merits. The dogma of the equality of souls
+before God was an essential dogma with Mohammedans as well as
+with Christians.
+
+But to proclaim a principle is not enough to secure its
+observation. The Christian Church soon renounced its theoretical
+equality, and the men of the Revolution only remembered it in
+their speeches.
+
+The sense of the term ``equality'' varies according to the
+persons using it. It often conceals sentiments very contrary to
+its real sense, and then represents the imperious need of having
+no one above one, joined to the no less lively desire to feel
+above others. With the Jacobins of the Revolution, as with those
+of our days, the word ``equality'' simply involves a jealous
+hatred of all superiority. To efface superiority, such men
+pretend to unify manners, customs, and situations. All
+despotisms but that exercised by themselves seem odious.
+
+Not being able to avoid the natural inequalities, they deny them.
+
+The second Declaration of Rights, that of 1793, affirms, contrary
+to the evidence, that ``all men are equal by nature.''
+
+It would seem that in many of the men of the Revolution
+the ardent desire for equality merely concealed an intense need
+of inequalities. Napoleon was obliged to re-establish titles of
+nobility and decorations for their benefit. Having shown that it
+was among the most rabid revolutionists that he found the most
+docile instruments of domination, Taine continues:--
+
+``Suddenly, through all their preaching of liberty and equality,
+appeared their authoritative instincts, their need of commanding,
+even as subordinates, and also, in most cases, an appetite for
+money or for pleasure. Between the delegate of the Committee of
+Public Safety and the minister, prefect, or subprefect of the
+Empire the difference is small: it is the same man under the two
+costumes, first en carmagnole, then in the braided coat.''
+
+The dogma of equality had as its first consequence the
+proclamation of popular sovereignty by the bourgeoisie. This
+sovereignty remained otherwise highly theoretical during the
+whole Revolution.
+
+The principle of authority was the lasting legacy of the
+Revolution. The two terms ``liberty'' and ``fraternity'' which
+accompany it in the republican device had never much influence.
+We may even say that they had none during the Revolution and the
+Empire, but merely served to decorate men's speeches.
+
+Their influence was hardly more considerable later. Fraternity
+was never practised and the peoples have never cared much for
+liberty. To-day our working-men have completely surrendered it
+to their unions.
+
+To sum up: although the Republican motto has been little
+applied it has exerted a very great influence. Of the French
+Revolution practically nothing has remained in the popular mind
+but the three celebrated words which sum up its gospel, and which
+its armies spread over Europe.
+
+
+
+BOOK II
+
+THE RATIONAL, AFFECTIVE, MYSTIC, AND COLLECTIVE INFLUENCES ACTIVE
+DURING THE REVOLUTION
+
+CHAPTER I
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY
+
+1. Psychological Influences active during the French Revolution.
+
+The genesis of the French Revolution, as well as its duration,
+was conditioned by elements of a rational, affective, mystic, and
+collective nature, each category of which was ruled by a
+different logic. It is, as I have said, because they have not
+been able to dissociate the respective influences of these
+factors that so many historians have interpreted this period so
+indifferently
+
+The rational element usually invoked as an explanation exerted in
+reality but a very slight influence. It prepared the way for the
+Revolution, but maintained it only at the outset, while it was
+still exclusively middle-class. Its action was manifested by
+many measures of the time, such as the proposals to reform the
+taxes, the suppression of the privileges of a useless nobility,
+&c.
+
+As soon as the Revolution reached the people, the influence of
+the rational elements speedily vanished before that of the
+affective and collective elements. As for the mystic elements,
+the foundation of the revolutionary faith, they made the army
+fanatical and propagated the new belief throughout the world.
+
+We shall see these various elements as they appeared in events
+and in the psychology of individuals. Perhaps the most important
+was the mystic element. The Revolution cannot be clearly
+comprehended--we cannot repeat it too often--unless it is
+considered as the formation of a religious belief. What I have
+said elsewhere of all beliefs applies equally to the Revolution.
+Referring, for instance, to the chapter on the Reformation, the
+reader will see that it presents more than one analogy with the
+Revolution.
+
+Having wasted so much time in demonstrating the slight rational
+value of beliefs, the philosophers are to-day beginning to
+understand their function better. They have been forced to admit
+that these are the only factors which possess an influence
+sufficient to transform all the elements of a civilisation.
+
+They impose themselves on men apart from reason and have the
+power to polarise men's thoughts and feelings in one direction.
+Pure reason had never such a power, for men were never
+impassioned by reason.
+
+The religious form rapidly assumed by the Revolution explains its
+power of expansion and the prestige which it possessed and has
+retained.
+
+Few historians have understood that this great monument ought to
+be regarded as the foundation of a new religion. The penetrating
+mind of Tocqueville, I believe, was the first to perceive as
+much.
+
+``The French Revolution,'' he wrote, ``was a political revolution
+which operated in the manner of and assumed something of the
+aspect of a religious revolution. See by what regular and
+characteristic traits it finally resembled the latter: not only
+did it spread itself far and wide like a religious revolution,
+but, like the latter, it spread itself by means of preaching and
+propaganda. A political revolution which inspires proselytes,
+which is preached as passionately to foreigners as it is
+accomplished at home: consider what a novel spectacle was this.''
+
+The religious side of the Revolution being granted, the
+accompanying fury and devastation are easily explained. History
+shows us that such are always the accompaniments of the birth of
+religions. The Revolution was therefore certain to provoke the
+violence and intolerance the triumphant deities demand from their
+adepts. It overturned all Europe for twenty years, ruined
+France, caused the death of millions of men, and cost the country
+several invasions: but it is as a rule only at the cost of such
+catastrophes that a people can change its beliefs.
+
+Although the mystic element is always the foundation of beliefs,
+certain affective and rational elements are quickly added
+thereto. A belief thus serves to group sentiments and passions
+and interests which belong to the affective domain. Reason then
+envelops the whole, seeking to justify events in which, however,
+it played no part whatever.
+
+At the moment of the Revolution every one, according to his
+aspirations, dressed the new belief in a different rational
+vesture. The peoples saw in it only the suppression of the
+religious and political despotisms and hierarchies under
+which they had so often suffered. Writers like Goethe and
+thinkers like Kant imagined that they saw in it the triumph of
+reason. Foreigners like Humboldt came to France ``to breathe the
+air of liberty and to assist at the obsequies of despotism.''
+
+These intellectual illusions did not last long. The evolution of
+the drama soon revealed the true foundations of the dream.
+
+
+2. Dissolution of the Ancien Regime. The assembling of the
+States General.
+
+
+Before they are realised in action, revolutions are sketched out
+in men's thoughts. Prepared by the causes already studied, the
+French Revolution commenced in reality with the reign of Louis
+XVI. More discontented and censorious every day, the middle
+classes added claim to claim. Everybody was calling for reform.
+
+Louis XVI. thoroughly understood the utility of reform, but he
+was too weak to impose it on the clergy and the nobility. He
+could not even retain his reforming ministers, Malesherbes and
+Turgot. What with famines and increased taxation, the poverty of
+all classes increased, and the huge pensions drawn by the Court
+formed a shocking contrast to the general distress.
+
+The notables convoked to attempt to remedy the financial
+situation refused a system of equal taxation, and granted only
+insignificant reforms which the Parliament did not even consent
+to register. It had to be dissolved. The provincial Parliaments
+made common cause with that of Paris, and were also dissolved.
+But they led opinion, and in all parts of France promoted
+the demand for a meeting of the States General, which had not
+been convoked for nearly two hundred years.
+
+The decision was taken: 5,000,000 Frenchmen, of whom 100,000
+were ecclesiastics and 150,000 nobles, sent their
+representatives. There were in all 1,200 deputies, of whom 578
+were of the Third Estate, consisting chiefly of magistrates,
+advocates, and physicians. Of the 300 deputies of the clergy,
+200, of plebeian origin, threw in their lot with the Third Estate
+against the nobility and clergy.
+
+From the first sessions a psychological conflict broke out
+between the deputies of different social conditions and
+(therefore) different mentalities. The magnificent costumes of
+the privileged deputies contrasted in a humiliating fashion with
+the sombre fashions of the Third Estate.
+
+At the first session the members of the nobility and the clergy
+ were covered, according to the prerogatives of their class,
+before the king. Those of the Third Estate wished to imitate
+them, but the privileged members protested. On the following day
+more protests of wounded self-love were heard. The deputies of
+the Third Estate invited those of the nobility and the clergy who
+were sitting in separate halls to join them for the verification
+of their powers. The nobles refused. The negotiations lasted
+more than a month. Finally, the deputies of the Third Estate, on
+the proposition of the Abbe Sieyes, considering that
+they represented 95 per cent. of the nation, declared themselves
+constituted as a National Assembly. From that moment the
+Revolution pursued its course.
+
+
+3. The Constituent Assembly.
+
+
+The power of a political assembly resides, above all, in the
+weakness of its adversaries. Astonished by the slight resistance
+encountered, and carried away by the ascendancy of a handful of
+orators, the Constituent Assembly, from its earliest sessions,
+spoke and acted as a sovereign body. Notably it arrogated to
+itself the power of decreeing imposts, a serious encroachment
+upon the prerogatives of the royal power.
+
+The resistance of Louis XVI. was feeble enough. He simply had
+the hall in which the States assembled closed. The deputies then
+met in the hall of the tennis-court, and took the oath that they
+would not separate until the Constitution of the kingdom was an
+established fact.
+
+The majority of the deputies of the clergy went with them. The
+king revoked the decision of the Assembly, and ordered the
+deputies to retire. The Marquis de Dreux-Breze, the Grand
+Master of Ceremonies, having invited them to obey the order of
+the sovereign, the President of the Assembly declared ``that the
+nation assembled cannot receive orders,'' and Mirabeau replied to
+the envoy of the sovereign that, being united by the will of the
+people, the Assembly would only withdraw at the point of the
+bayonet. Again the king gave way.
+
+On the 9th of June the meeting of deputies took the title of the
+Constituent Assembly. For the first time in centuries the king
+was forced to recognise the existence of a new power, formerly
+ignored--that of the people, represented by its elected
+representatives. The absolute monarchy was no more.
+
+Feeling himself more and more seriously threatened, Louis XVI.
+summoned to Versailles a number of regiments composed of foreign
+mercenaries. The Assembly demanded the withdrawal of the troops.
+
+The king refused, and dismissed Necker, replacing him by the
+Marshal de Broglie, reputed to be an extremely authoritative
+person.
+
+But the Assembly had able supporters. Camille Desmoulins and
+others harangued the crowd in all directions, calling it to the
+defence of liberty. They sounded the tocsin, organised a militia
+of 12,000 men, took muskets and cannon from the Invalides, and on
+the 14th of July the armed bands marched upon the Bastille. The
+fortress, barely defended, capitulated in a few hours. Seven
+prisoners were found within it, of whom one was an idiot and four
+were accused of forgery.
+
+The Bastille, the prison of many victims of arbitrary power,
+symbolised the royal power to many minds; but the people who
+demolished it had not suffered by it. Scarcely any but members
+of the nobility were imprisoned there.
+
+The influence exercised by the taking of this fortress has
+continued to our days. Serious historians like M. Rambaud assure
+us that ``the taking of the Bastille is a culminating fact in the
+history, not of France only but of all Europe, and inaugurates a
+new epoch in the history of the world.''
+
+Such credulity is a little excessive. The importance of the
+event lay simply in the psychological fact that for the first
+time the people received an obvious proof of the weakness of an
+authority which had lately been formidable.
+
+When the principle of authority is injured in the public mind it
+dissolves very rapidly. What might not one demand of a king who
+could not defend his principal fortress against popular attacks?
+The master regarded as all-powerful had ceased to be so.
+
+The taking of the Bastille was the beginning of one of those
+phenomena of mental contagion which abound in the history of the
+Revolution. The foreign mercenary troops, although they could
+scarcely be interested in the movement, began to show symptoms of
+mutiny. Louis XVI. was reduced to accepting their disbandment.
+He recalled Necker, went to the Hotel de Ville, sanctioned by
+his presence the accomplished facts, and accepted from La
+Fayette, commandant of the National Guard, the new cockade of
+red, white, and blue which allied the colours of Paris to those
+of the king.
+
+Although the riot which ended in the taking of the Bastille can
+by no means be regarded as ``a culminating fact in history,'' it
+does mark the precise moment of the commencement of popular
+government. The armed people thenceforth intervened daily in the
+deliberations of the revolutionary Assemblies, and seriously
+influenced their conduct.
+
+This intervention of the people in conformity with the dogma of
+its sovereignty has provoked the respectful admiration of many
+historians of the Revolution. Even a superficial study of the
+psychology of crowds would speedily have shown them that the
+mystic entity which they call the people was merely translating
+the will of a few leaders. It is not correct to say that the
+people took the Bastille, attacked the Tuileries, invaded the
+Convention, &c., but that certain leaders--generally by
+means of the clubs--united armed bands of the populace, which
+they led against the Bastille, the Tuileries, &c. During the
+Revolution the same crowds attacked or defended the most contrary
+parties, according to the leaders who happened to be at their
+heads. A crowd never has any opinion but that of its leaders.
+
+Example constituting one of the most potent forms of suggestion,
+the taking of the Bastille was inevitably followed by the
+destruction of other fortresses. Many chateaux were regarded as
+so many little Bastilles, and in order to imitate the Parisians
+who had destroyed theirs the peasants began to burn them. They
+did so with the greater fury because the seigneurial homes
+contained the titles of feudal dues. It was a species of
+Jacquerie.
+
+The Constituent Assembly, so proud and haughty towards the king,
+was, like all the revolutionary assemblies which followed it,
+extremely pusillanimous before the people.
+
+Hoping to put an end to the disorders of the night of August 4th,
+it voted, on the proposition of a member of the nobility, the
+Comte de Noailles, the abolition of seigneurial rights. Although
+this measure suppressed at one stroke the privileges of the
+nobles, it was voted with tears and embracings. Such accesses of
+sentimental enthusiasm are readily explained when we recall how
+contagious emotion is in a crowd, above all in an assembly
+oppressed by fear.
+
+If the renunciation of their rights had been effected by the
+nobility a few years earlier, the Revolution would doubtless have
+been avoided, but it was now too late. To give way only when one
+is forced to do so merely increases the demands of those
+to whom one yields. In politics one should always look ahead and
+give way long before one is forced to do so.
+
+Louis XVI. hesitated for two months to ratify the decisions voted
+by the Assembly on the night of the 4th of August. He had
+retired to Versailles. The leaders sent thither a band of 7,000
+or 8,000 men and women of the people, assuring them that the
+royal residence contained great stores of bread. The railings of
+the palace were forced, some of the bodyguard were killed, and
+the king and all his family were led back to Paris in the midst
+of a shrieking crowd, many of whom bore on the ends of their
+pikes the heads of the soldiers massacred. The dreadful journey
+lasted six hours. These events constituted what are known as the
+``days'' of October.
+
+The popular power increased, and in reality the king, like the
+whole assembly, was henceforth in the hands of the people--that
+is, at the mercy of the clubs and their leaders. This popular
+power was to prevail for nearly ten years, and the Revolution was
+to be almost entirely its work.
+
+While proclaiming that the people constituted the only sovereign,
+the Assembly was greatly embarrassed by riots which went far
+beyond its theoretical expectations. It had supposed that order
+would be restored while it fabricated a Constitution destined to
+assure the eternal happiness of mankind.
+
+We know that during the whole duration of the Revolution one of
+the chief occupations of the assemblies was to make, unmake, and
+remake Constitutions. The theorists attributed to them then, as
+they do to-day, the power of transforming society; the
+Assembly, therefore, could not neglect its task. In the meantime
+it published a solemn Declaration of the Rights of Man which
+summarised its principles.
+
+The Constitution, proclamations, declarations, and speeches had
+not the slightest effect on the popular movements, nor on the
+dissentients who daily increased in number in the heart of the
+Assembly. The latter became more and more subjected to the
+ascendancy of the advanced party, which was supported by the
+clubs. Danton, Camille Desmoulins, and later Marat and
+Hebert, violently excited the populace by their harangues and
+their journals. The Assembly was rapidly going down the slope
+that leads to extremes.
+
+During all these disorders the finances of the country were not
+improving. Finally convinced that philanthropic speeches would
+not alter their lamentable condition, and seeing that bankruptcy
+threatened, the Assembly decreed, on the 2nd of November, 1789,
+the confiscation of the goods of the Church. Their revenues,
+consisting of the tithes collected from the faithful, amounted to
+some L8,000,000, and their value was estimated at about
+L120,000,000. They were divided among some hundreds of
+prelates, Court abbes, &c., who owned a quarter of all France.
+These goods, henceforth entitled is ``national domains,'' formed
+the guarantee of the assignats, the first issue of which was
+for 400,000,000 francs (L16,000,000 sterling). The public
+accepted them at the outset, but they multiplied so under the
+Directory and the Convention, which issued 45,000,000,000 francs
+in this form (L1,800,000,000 sterling), that an assignat of
+100 livres was finally worth only a few halfpence.
+
+Stimulated by his advisers, the feeble Louis attempted in
+vain to struggle against the decrees of the Assembly by refusing
+to sanction them.
+
+Under the influence of the daily suggestions of the leaders and
+the power of mental contagion the revolutionary movement was
+spreading everywhere independently of the Assembly and often even
+against it.
+
+In the towns and villages revolutionary municipalities were
+instituted, protected by the local National Guards. Those of
+neighbouring towns commenced to make mutual arrangements to
+defend themselves should need arise. Thus federations were
+formed, which were soon rolled into one; this sent 14,000
+National Guards to Paris, who assembled on the Champ-de-Mars on
+the 14th of July, 1790. There the king swore to maintain the
+Constitution decreed by the National Assembly.
+
+Despite this vain oath it became more evident every day that no
+agreement was possible between the hereditary principles of the
+monarchy and those proclaimed by the Assembly.
+
+Feeling himself completely powerless, the king thought only of
+flight. Arrested at Varennes and brought back a prisoner to
+Paris, he was shut up in the Tuileries. The Assembly, although
+still extremely royalist, suspended him from power, and decided
+to assume the sole charge of the government.
+
+Never did sovereign find himself in a position so difficult as
+that of Louis at the time of his flight. The genius of a
+Richelieu would hardly have extricated him. The only element of
+defence on which he could have relied had from the beginning
+absolutely failed him.
+
+During the whole duration of the Constituent Assembly the
+immense majority of Frenchmen and of the Assembly remained
+royalist, so that had the sovereign accepted a liberal monarchy
+he could perhaps have remained in power. It would seem that
+Louis had little to promise in order to come to an agreement with
+the Assembly.
+
+Little, perhaps, but with his structure of mind that little was
+strictly impossible. All the shades of his forbears would have
+risen up in front of him had he consented to modify the mechanism
+of the monarchy inherited from so many ancestors. And even had
+he attempted to do so, the opposition of his family, the clergy,
+the nobles, and the Court could never have been surmounted. The
+ancient castes on which the monarchy rested, the nobility and the
+clergy, were then almost as powerful as the monarch himself.
+Every time it seemed as though he might yield to the injunctions
+of the Assembly it was because he was constrained to do so by
+force, and to attempt to gain time. His appeals to alien Powers
+represented the resolution of a desperate man who had seen all
+his natural defences fail him.
+
+He, and especially the queen, entertained the strangest illusions
+as to the possible assistance of Austria, for centuries the rival
+of France. If Austria indolently consented to come to his aid,
+it was only in the hope of receiving a great reward. Mercy gave
+him to understand that the payment expected consisted of Alsace,
+the Alps, and Navarre.
+
+The leaders of the clubs, finding the Assembly too royalist, sent
+the people against it. A petition was signed, inviting the
+Assembly to convoke a new constituent power to proceed to the
+trial of Louis XVI.
+
+Monarchical in spite of all, and finding that the Revolution was
+assuming a character far too demagogic, the Assembly resolved to
+defend itself against the actions of the people. A battalion of
+the National Guard, commanded by La Fayette, was sent to the
+Champ-de-Mars, where the crowd was assembled, to disperse it.
+Fifty of those present were killed.
+
+The Assembly did not long persist in its feeble resistance.
+Extremely fearful of the people, it increased its arrogance
+towards the king, depriving him every day of some part of his
+prerogatives and authority. He was now scarcely more than a mere
+official obliged to execute the wishes of others.
+
+The Assembly had imagined that it would be able to exercise the
+authority of which it had deprived the king, but such a task was
+infinitely above its resources. A power so divided is always
+weak. ``I know nothing more terrible,'' said Mirabeau, ``than
+the sovereign authority of six hundred persons.''
+
+Having flattered itself that it could combine in itself all the
+powers of the State, and exercise them as Louis XVI. had done,
+the Assembly very soon exercised none whatever.
+
+As its authority failed anarchy increased. The popular leaders
+continually stirred up the people. Riot and insurrection became
+the sole power. Every day the Assembly was invaded by rowdy and
+imperious delegations which operated by means of threats and
+demands.
+
+All these popular movements, which the Assembly, under the stress
+of fear, invariably obeyed, had nothing spontaneous about them.
+They simply represented the manifestations of new powers--the
+clubs and the Commune--which had been set up beside the
+Assembly.
+
+The most powerful of these clubs was the Jacobin, which had
+quickly created more than five hundred branches in the country,
+all of which were under the orders of the central body. Its
+influence remained preponderant during the whole duration of the
+Revolution. It was the master of the Assembly, and then of
+France, its only rival the insurrectionary Commune, whose power
+was exercised only in Paris.
+
+The weakness of the national Assembly and all its failures had
+made it extremely unpopular. It became conscious of this, and,
+feeling that it was every day more powerless, decided to hasten
+the creation of the new Constitution in order that it might
+dissolve. Its last action, which was tactless enough, was to
+decree that no member of the Constituent Assembly should be
+elected to the Legislative Assembly. The members of the latter
+were thus deprived of the experience acquired by their
+predecessors.
+
+The Constitution was completed on the 3rd of September, 1791, and
+accepted on the 13th by the king, to whom the Assembly had
+restored his powers.
+
+This Constitution organised a representative Government,
+delegating the legislative power to deputies elected by the
+people, and the executive power to the king, whose right of veto
+over the decrees of the Assembly was recognised. New
+departmental divisions were substituted for the old provinces.
+The imposts were abolished, and replaced by direct and indirect
+taxes, which are still in force.
+
+The Assembly, which had just altered the territorial divisions
+and overthrown all the old social organisation, thought
+itself powerful enough to transform the religious organisation of
+the country also. It claimed notably that the members of the
+clergy should be elected by the people, and should be thus
+withdrawn from the influence of their supreme head, the Pope.
+
+This civil constitution of the clergy was the origin of religious
+struggles and persecutions which lasted until the days of the
+Consulate. Two-thirds of the priests refused the oath demanded
+of them.
+
+During the three years which represented the life of the
+Constituent Assembly the Revolution had produced considerable
+results. The principal result was perhaps the beginning of the
+transference to the Third Estate of the riches of the privileged
+classes. In this way while interests were created to be defended
+fervent adherents were raised up to the new regime. A
+Revolution supported by the gratification of acquired appetites
+is bound to be powerful. The Third Estate, which had supplanted
+the nobles, and the peasants, who had bought the national
+domains, would readily understand that the restoration of the
+ancien regime would despoil them of all their advantages.
+The energetic defence of the Revolution was merely the defence of
+their own fortunes.
+
+This is why we see, during part of the Revolution, nearly half
+the departments vainly rising against the despotism that crushed
+them. The Republicans triumphed over all opposition. They were
+extremely powerful in that they had to defend, not only a new
+ideal, but new material interests. We shall see that the
+influence of these two factors lasted during the whole of the
+Revolution, and contributed powerfully to the establishment of
+the Empire.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER II
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
+
+1. Political Events during the Life of the Legislative Assembly.
+
+Before examining the mental characteristics of the Legislative
+Assembly let us briefly sum up the considerable political events
+which marked its short year's life. They naturally played an
+important part in respect of its psychological manifestations.
+
+Extremely monarchical, the Legislative Assembly had no more idea
+than its predecessor of destroying the monarchy. The king
+appeared to it to be slightly suspect, but it still hoped to be
+able to retain him on the throne.
+
+Unhappily for him, Louis was incessantly begging for intervention
+from abroad. Shut up in the Tuileries, defended only by his
+Swiss Guards, the timid sovereign was drifting among contrary
+influences. He subsidised journals intended to modify public
+opinion, but the obscure ``penny-a-liners'' who edited them knew
+nothing of acting on the mind of the crowd. Their only means of
+persuasion was to menace with the gallows all the partisans of
+the Revolution, and to predict the invasion of France by an army
+which would rescue the king.
+
+Royalty no longer counted on anything but the foreign
+Courts. The nobles were emigrating. Prussia, Austria, and
+Russia were threatening France with a war of invasion. The Court
+favoured their lead. To the coalition of the three kings against
+France the Jacobin Club proposed to oppose a league of peoples.
+The Girondists were then, with the Jacobins, at the head of the
+revolutionary movement. They incited the masses to arm
+themselves--600,000 volunteers were equipped. The Court accepted
+a Girondist minister. Dominated by him, Louis XVI. was obliged
+to propose to the Assembly a war against Austria. It was
+immediately agreed to.
+
+In declaring war the king was not sincere. The queen revealed
+the French plans of campaign and the secret deliberations of the
+Council to the Austrians.
+
+The beginnings of the struggle were disastrous. Several columns
+of troops, attacked by panic, disbanded. Stimulated by the
+clubs, and persuaded--justly, for that matter--that the king was
+conspiring with the enemies of France, the population of the
+faubourgs rose in insurrection. Its leaders, the Jacobins, and
+above all Danton, sent to the Tuileries on the 20th of June a
+petition threatening the king with revocation. It then invaded
+the Tuileries, heaping invectives on the sovereign.
+
+Fatality impelled Louis toward his tragic destiny. While the
+threats of the Jacobins against royalty had roused many of the
+departments to indignation, it was learned that a Prussian army
+had arrived on the frontiers of Lorraine.
+
+The hope of the king and queen respecting the help to be obtained
+from abroad was highly chimerical. Marie-Antoinette
+suffered from an absolute illusion as to the psychology of the
+Austrian and the French peoples. Seeing France terrorised by a
+few energumens, she supposed that it would be equally easy to
+terrify the Parisians, and by means of threats to lead them back
+under the king's authority. Inspired by her, Fersen undertook to
+publish the manifesto of the Duke of Brunswick, threatening Paris
+with ``total subversion if the royal family were molested.''
+
+The effect produced was diametrically opposite to that intended.
+The manifesto aroused indignation against the monarch, who was
+regarded as an accomplice, and increased his unpopularity. From
+that day he was marked for the scaffold.
+
+Carried away by Danton, the delegates of the sections installed
+themselves at the Hotel de Ville as an insurrectionary
+Commune, which arrested the commandant of the National Guard, who
+was devoted to the king, sounded the tocsin, equipped the
+National Guard, and on the 10th of August hurled them, with the
+populace, against the Tuileries. The regiments called in by
+Louis disbanded themselves. Soon none were left to defend him
+but his Swiss and a few gentlemen. Nearly all were killed. Left
+alone, the king took refuge with the Assembly. The crowds
+demanded his denouncement. The Legislative Assembly decreed his
+suspension and left a future Assembly, the Convention, to decide
+upon his fate.
+
+
+2. Mental Characteristics of the Legislative Assembly.
+
+
+The Legislative Assembly, formed of new men, presented quite a
+special interest from the psychological point of view.
+Few assemblies have offered in such a degree the characteristics
+of the political collectivity.
+
+It comprised seven hundred and fifty deputies, divided into pure
+royalists, constitutional royalists, republicans, Girondists, and
+Montagnards. Advocates and men of letters formed the majority.
+It also contained, but in smaller numbers, superior officers,
+priests, and a very few scientists.
+
+The philosophical conceptions of the members of this Assembly
+seem rudimentary enough. Many were imbued with Rousseau's idea
+of a return to a state of nature. But all, like their
+predecessors, were dominated more especially by recollections of
+Greek and Latin antiquity. Cato, Brutus, Gracchus, Plutarch,
+Marcus Aurelius, and Plato, continually evoked, furnished the
+images of their speech. When the orator wished to insult Louis
+XVI. he called him Caligula.
+
+In hoping to destroy tradition they were revolutionaries, but in
+claiming to return to a remote past they showed themselves
+extremely reactionary.
+
+For the rest, all these theories had very little influence on
+their conduct. Reason was continually figuring in their
+speeches, but never in their actions. These were always
+dominated by those affective and mystic elements whose potency we
+have so often demonstrated.
+
+The psychological characteristics of the Legislative Assembly
+were those of the Constituent Assembly, but were greatly
+accentuated. They may be summed up in four words:
+impressionability, mobility, timidity, and weakness.
+
+This mobility and impressionability are revealed in the constant
+variability of their conduct. One day they exchange noisy
+invective and blows. On the following day we see them ``throwing
+themselves into one another's arms with torrents of tears.''
+They eagerly applaud an address demanding the punishment of those
+who have petitioned for the king's dethronement, and the same day
+accord the honours of the session to a delegation which has come
+to demand his downfall.
+
+The pusillanimity and weakness of the Assembly in the face of
+threats was extreme. Although royalist it voted the suspension
+of the king, and on the demand of the Commune delivered him, with
+his family, to be imprisoned in the Temple,
+
+Thanks to its weakness, it was as incapable as the Constituent
+Assembly of exercising any power, and allowed itself to be
+dominated by the Commune and the clubs, which were directed by
+such influential leaders as Hebert, Tallien, Rossignol, Marat,
+Robespierre, &c.
+
+Until Thermidor, 1794, the insurrectionary Commune constituted
+the chief power in the State, and behaved precisely as if it had
+been charged with the government of Paris.
+
+It was the Commune that demanded the imprisonment of Louis XVI.
+in the tower of the Temple, when the Assembly wished to imprison
+him in the palace of the Luxembourg. It was the Commune again
+that filled the prisons with suspects, and then ordered them to
+be killed.
+
+We know with what refinements of cruelty a handful of some 150
+bandits, paid at the rate of 24 livres a day, and directed by a
+few members of the Commune, exterminated some 1,200 persons in
+four days. This crime was known as the massacre of September.
+The mayor of Paris, Petion, received the band of assassins with
+respect, and gave them drink. A few Girondists protested
+somewhat, but the Jacobins were silent.
+
+The terrorised Assembly affected at first to ignore the
+massacres, which were encouraged by several of its more
+influential deputies, notably Couthon and Billaud-Varenne. When
+at last it decided to condemn them it was without attempting to
+prevent their continuation.
+
+Conscious of its impotence, the Legislative Assembly dissolved
+itself a fortnight later in order to give way to the Convention.
+
+Its work was obviously disastrous, not in intention but in fact.
+Royalist, it abandoned the monarchy; humanitarian, it allowed the
+massacres of September; pacific, it pushed France into a
+formidable war, thus showing that a weak Government always ends
+by bringing ruin upon its country.
+
+The history of the two previous revolutionary Assemblies proves
+once more to what point events carry within them their inevitable
+consequences. They constitute a train of necessities of which we
+can sometimes choose the first, but which then evolve without
+consulting us. We are free to make a decision, but powerless to
+avert its consequences.
+
+The first measures of the Constituent Assembly were rational and
+voluntary, but the results which followed were beyond all will or
+reason or foresight.
+
+Which of the men of 1789 would have ventured to desire or predict
+the death of Louis XVI., the wars of La Vendee, the Terror, the
+permanent guillotine and the final anarchy, or the ensuing return
+to tradition and order, guided by the iron hand of a soldier?
+
+In the development of events which ensued from the early actions
+of the revolutionary Assemblies the most striking, perhaps, was
+the rise and development of the government of the crowd--of mob
+rule.
+
+Behind the facts which we have been considering--the taking of
+the Bastille, the invasion of Versailles, the massacres of
+September, the attack on the Tuileries, the murder of the Swiss
+Guards, and the downfall and imprisonment of the king--we can
+readily perceive the laws affecting the psychology of crowds and
+their leaders.
+
+We shall now see that the power of the multitude will
+progressively increase, overcome all other powers, and finally
+replace them.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER III
+
+THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE CONVENTION
+
+1. The Legend of the Convention.
+
+The history of the Convention is not merely fertile in
+psychological documents. It also shows how powerless the
+witnesses of any period and even their immediate successors are
+to form an exact idea of the events which they have witnessed,
+and the men who have surrounded them.
+
+More than a century has elapsed since the Revolution, and men are
+only just beginning to form judgments concerning this period
+which, if still often doubtful enough, are slightly more accurate
+than of old.
+
+This happens, not only because new documents are being drawn from
+the archives, but because the legends which enveloped that
+sanguinary period in a magical cloud are gradually vanishing with
+the passage of time.
+
+Perhaps the most tenacious legend of all was that which until
+formerly used to surround the personages to whom our fathers
+applied the glorious epithet, ``the Giants of the Convention.''
+
+The struggles of the Convention against France in insurrection
+and Europe in arms produced such an impression that the heroes of
+this formidable struggle seemed to belong to a race of supermen
+or Titans.
+
+The epithet ``giant'' seemed justified so long as the events of
+the period were confused and massed together. Regarded as
+connected when it was simply simultaneous, the work of the armies
+was confounded with that of the Convention. The glory of the
+first recoiled upon the second, and served as an excuse for the
+hecatombs of the Terror, the ferocity of the civil war, and the
+devastation of France.
+
+Under the penetrating scrutiny of modern criticism, the
+heterogeneous mass of events has been slowly disentangled. The
+armies of the Republic have retained their old prestige, but we
+have been forced to recognise that the men of the Convention,
+absorbed entirely by their intestine conflicts, had very little
+to do with their victories. At the most two or three members of
+the committees of the Assembly were concerned with the armies,
+and the fact that they were victorious was due, apart from their
+numbers and the talents of their young generals, to the
+enthusiasm with which a new faith had inspired them.
+
+In a later chapter, devoted to the revolutionary armies, we shall
+see how they conquered Europe in arms. They set out inspired by
+the ideas of liberty and equality which constituted the new
+gospel, and once on the frontiers, which were to keep them so
+long, they retained a special mentality, very different from that
+of the Government, which they first knew nothing of and
+afterwards despised.
+
+Having no part whatever in their victories, the men of the
+Convention contented themselves with legislating at hazard
+according to the injunctions of the leaders who directed them,
+and who claimed to be regenerating France by means of the
+guillotine.
+
+But it was thanks to these valiant armies that the history of the
+Convention was transformed into an apotheosis which affected
+several generations with a religious respect which even to-day is
+hardly extinct.
+
+Studying in detail the psychology of the ``Giants'' of the
+Convention, we find their magnitude shrink very rapidly. They
+were in general extremely mediocre. Their most fervent
+defenders, such as M. Aulard, are obliged to admit as much.
+
+This is how M. Aulard puts it in his History of the French
+Revolution:--
+
+``It has been said that the generation which from 1789 to 1799
+did such great and terrible things was a generation of giants,
+or, to put it more plainly, that it was a generation more
+distinguished than that which preceded it or that which followed.
+
+This is a retrospective illusion. The citizens who formed the
+municipal and Jacobin or nationalist groups by which the
+Revolution was effected do not seem to have been superior, either
+in enlightenment or in talents, to the Frenchmen of the time of
+Louis XV. or of Louis Philippe. Were those exceptionally gifted
+whose names history has retained because they appeared on the
+stage of Paris, or because they were the most brilliant orators
+of the various revolutionary Assemblies? Mirabeau, up to a
+certain point, deserved the title of genius; but as to the rest--
+Robespierre, Danton, Vergniaud--had they truly more talent, for
+example, than our modern orators? In 1793, in the time of the
+supposed `giants,' Mme. Roland wrote in her memoirs: `France was
+as though drained of men; their dearth during this revolution is
+truly surprising; there have scarcely been any but pigmies.' ''
+
+If after considering the men of the Convention individually we
+consider them in a body, we may say that they did not shine
+either by intelligence or by virtue or by courage. Never did a
+body of men manifest such pusillanimity. They had no courage
+save in their speeches or in respect of remote dangers. This
+Assembly, so proud and threatening in its speech when addressing
+royalty, was perhaps the most timid and docile political
+collectivity that the world has ever known. We see it slavishly
+obedient to the orders of the clubs and the Commune, trembling
+before the popular delegations which invaded it daily, and
+obeying the injunctions of the rioters to the point of handing
+over to them its most brilliant members. The Convention affords
+the world a melancholy spectacle, voting, at the popular behest,
+laws so absurd that it is obliged to annul them as soon as the
+rioters have quitted the hall.
+
+Few Assemblies have given proof of such weakness. When we wish
+to show how low a popular Government can fall we have only to
+point to the Convention.
+
+
+2. Results of the Triumph of the Jacobin Religion
+
+
+Among the causes that gave the Convention its special
+physiognomy, one of the most important was the definite
+establishment of a revolutionary religion. A dogma which was at
+first in process of formation was at last finally erected.
+
+This dogma was composed of an aggregate of somewhat inconsistent
+elements. Nature, the rights of man, liberty, equality, the
+social contract, hatred of tyrants, and popular sovereignty
+formed the articles of a gospel which, to its disciples, was
+above discussion. The new truths had found apostles who were
+certain of their power, and who finally, like believers all the
+world over, sought to impose them by force. No heed should be
+taken of the opinion of unbelievers; they all deserved to be
+exterminated.
+
+The hatred of heretics having been always, as we have seen, in
+respect of the Reformation, an irreducible characteristic of
+great beliefs, we can readily comprehend the intolerance of the
+Jacobin religion.
+
+The history of the Reformation proves also that the conflict
+between two allied beliefs is very bitter. We must not,
+therefore, be astonished that in the Convention the Jacobins
+fought furiously against the other republicans, whose faith
+hardly differed from their own.
+
+The propaganda of the new apostles was very energetic. To
+convert the provinces they sent thither zealous disciples
+escorted by guillotines. The inquisitors of the new faith would
+have no paltering with error. As Robespierre said, ``The
+republic is the destruction of everything that is opposed to
+it.'' What matter that the country refused to be regenerated?
+It should be regenerated despite itself. ``We will make a
+cemetery of France,'' said Carrier, ``rather than fail to
+regenerate it in our own way.''
+
+The Jacobin policy derived from the new faith was very simple.
+It consisted in a sort of equalitarian Socialism, directed by a
+dictatorship which would brook no opposition.
+
+Of practical ideas consistent with the economic necessities and
+the true nature of man, the theorists who ruled France would have
+nothing to say. Speech and the guillotine sufficed them. Their
+speeches were childish. ``Never a fact,'' says Taine, ``nothing
+but abstractions, strings of sentences about Nature, reason, the
+people, tyrants, liberty: like so many puffed-out balloons
+uselessly jostling in space. If we did not know that it all
+ended in practical and dreadful results, we should think they
+were games of logic, school exercises, academical demonstrations,
+ideological combinations.''
+
+The theories of the Jacobins amounted practically to an absolute
+tyranny. To them it seemed evident that a sovereign State must
+be obeyed without discussion by citizens rendered equal as to
+conditions and fortune.
+
+The power with which they invested themselves was far greater
+than that of the monarchs who had preceded them. They fixed the
+prices of merchandise and arrogated the right to dispose of the
+life and property of citizens.
+
+Their confidence in the regenerative virtues of the revolutionary
+faith was such that after having declared war upon kings they
+declared war upon the gods. A calendar was established from
+which the saints were banished. They created a new divinity,
+Reason, whose worship was celebrated in Notre-Dame, with
+ceremonies which were in many ways identical with those of the
+Catholic faith, upon the altar of the ``late Holy Virgin.'' This
+cult lasted until Robespierre substituted a personal religion of
+which he constituted himself the high priest.
+
+The sole masters of France, the Jacobins and their
+disciples were able to plunder the country with impunity,
+although they were never in the majority anywhere.
+
+Their numbers are not easy to determine exactly. We know only
+that they were very small. Taine valued them at 5,000 in Paris,
+among 700,000 inhabitants; in Besancon 300 among 300,000; and
+in all France about 300,000.
+
+``A small feudality of brigands, set over a conquered France,''
+according to the words of the same author, they were able, in
+spite of their small numbers, to dominate the country, and this
+for several reasons. In the first place, their faith gave them a
+considerable strength. Then, because they represented the
+Government, and for centuries the French had obeyed those who
+were in command. Finally, because it was believed that to
+overthrow them would be to bring back the ancien regime,
+which was greatly dreaded by the numerous purchasers of the
+national domains. Their tyranny must have grown frightful indeed
+to force so many departments to rise against them.
+
+The first factor of their power was very important. In the
+conflict between powerful faiths and weak faiths victory never
+falls to the latter. A powerful faith creates strong wills,
+which will always overpower weak wills. That the Jacobins
+themselves did finally perish was because their accumulated
+violence had bound together thousands of weak wills whose united
+weight overbalanced their own strong wills.
+
+It is true that the Girondists, whom the Jacobins persecuted with
+so much hatred, had also well-established beliefs, but in the
+struggle which ensued their education told against them,
+together with their respect for certain traditions and the rights
+of others, scruples which did not in the least trouble their
+adversaries.
+
+``The majority of the sentiments of the Girondists,'' writes
+Emile Ollivier, ``were delicate and generous; those of the
+Jacobin mob were low, gross, and brutal. The name of Vergniaud,
+compared with that of the `divine' Marat, measures a gulf which
+nothing could span.''
+
+Dominating the Convention at the outset by the superiority of
+their talents and their eloquence, the Girondists soon fell under
+the domination of the Montagnards--worthless energumens, who
+carried little weight, but were always active, and who knew how
+to excite the passions of the populace. It was violence and not
+talent that impressed the Assemblies.
+
+
+3. Mental Characteristics of the Convention.
+
+
+Beside the characteristics common to all assemblies there are
+some created by influences of environment and circumstances,
+which give any particular assembly of men a special physiognomy.
+Most of the characteristics observable in the Constituent and
+Legislative Assemblies reappeared, in an exaggerated form, in the
+Convention.
+
+This Assembly comprised about seven hundred and fifty deputies,
+of whom rather more than a third had sat in the Constituent or
+the Legislative Assembly. By terrorising the population the
+Jacobins contrived to triumph at the elections. The majority of
+the electors, six millions out of seven, preferred to abstain
+from voting.
+
+As to the professions, the Assembly contained a large number of
+lawyers, advocates, notaries, bailiffs, ex-magistrates, and a few
+literary men.
+
+The mentality of the Convention was not homogeneous. Now, an
+assembly composed of individuals of widely different characters
+soon splits up into a number of groups. The Convention very
+early contained three--the Gironde, the Mountain, and the Plain.
+The constitutional monarchists had almost disappeared.
+
+The Gironde and the Mountain, extreme parties, consisted of about
+a hundred members apiece, who successively became leaders. In
+the Mountain were the most advanced members: Couthon, Herault
+de Sechelles, Danton, Camille Desmoulins, Marat, Collot
+d'Herbois, Billaud-Varennes, Barras, Saint-Just, Fouche,
+Tallien, Carrier, Robespierre, &c. In the Gironde were Brissot,
+Petion, Condorcet, Vergniaud, &c.
+
+The five hundred other members of the Assembly--that is, the
+great majority--constituted what was known as the Plain.
+
+This latter formed a floating mass, silent, undecided, and timid;
+ready to follow every impulse and to be carried away by the
+excitement of the moment. It gave ear indifferently to the
+stronger of the two preceding groups. After obeying the Gironde
+for some time it allowed itself to be led away by the Mountain,
+when the latter triumphed over its enemy. This was a natural
+consequence of the law already stated, by which the weak
+invariably fall under the dominion of the stronger wills.
+
+The influence of great manipulators of men was displayed
+in a high degree during the Convention. It was constantly led by
+a violent minority of narrow minds, whose intense convictions
+lent them great strength.
+
+A brutal and audacious minority will always lead a fearful and
+irresolute majority. This explains the constant tendency toward
+extremes to be observed in all revolutionary assemblies. The
+history of the Convention verifies once more the law of
+acceleration studied in another chapter.
+
+The men of the Convention were thus bound to pass from moderation
+to greater and greater violence. Finally they decimated
+themselves. Of the 180 Girondists who at the outset led the
+Convention 140 were killed or fled, and finally the most
+fanatical of the Terrorists, Robespierre, reigned alone over a
+terrified crowd of servile representatives.
+
+Yet it was among the five hundred members of the majority,
+uncertain and floating as it was, that the intelligence and
+experience were to be found. The technical committees to whom
+the useful work of the Convention was due were recruited from the
+Plain.
+
+More or less indifferent to politics, the members of the Plain
+were chiefly anxious that no one should pay particular attention
+to them. Shut up in their committees, they showed themselves as
+little as possible in the Assembly, which explains why the
+sessions of the Convention contained barely a third of the
+deputies.
+
+Unhappily, as often happens, these intelligent and honest men
+were completely devoid of character, and the fear which always
+dominated them made them vote for the worst of the
+measures introduced by their dreaded masters.
+
+The men of the Plain voted for everything they were ordered to
+vote for--the creation of the Revolutionary Tribunal, the Terror,
+&c. It was with their assistance that the Mountain crushed the
+Gironde, and Robespierre destroyed the Hebertists and
+Dantonists. Like all weak people, they followed the strong. The
+gentle philanthropists who composed the Plain, and constituted
+the majority of the Assembly, contributed, by their
+pusillanimity, to bring about the frightful excesses of the
+Convention.
+
+The psychological note always prevailing in the Convention was a
+horrible fear. It was more especially through fear that men cut
+off one another's heads, in the doubtful hope of keeping their
+own on their shoulders.
+
+Such a fear was, of course, very comprehensible. The unhappy
+deputies deliberated amid the hootings and vociferations of the
+tribunes. At every moment veritable savages, armed with pikes,
+invaded the Assembly, and the majority of the members no longer
+dared to attend the sessions. When by chance they did go it was
+only to vote in silence according to the orders of the Mountain,
+which was only a third as numerous.
+
+The fear which dominated the latter, although less visible, was
+just as profound. Men destroyed their enemies, not only because
+they were shallow fanatics, but because they were convinced that
+their own existence was threatened. The judges of the
+revolutionary Tribunals trembled no less. They would have
+willingly acquitted Danton, and the widow of Camille
+Desmoulins, and many others. They dared not.
+
+But it was above all when Robespierre became the sole master that
+the phantom of fear oppressed the Assembly. It has truly been
+said that a glance from the master made his colleagues shrink
+with fear. On their faces one read ``the pallor of fear and the
+abandon of despair.''
+
+All feared Robespierre and Robespierre feared all. It was
+because he feared conspiracies against him that he cut off men's
+heads, and it was also through fear that others allowed him to do
+so.
+
+The memoirs of members of the Convention show plainly what a
+horrible memory they retained of this gloomy period. Questioned
+twenty years later, says Taine, on the true aim and the intimate
+thoughts of the Committee of Public Safety, Barrere replied:--
+
+``We had only one feeling, that of self-preservation; only one
+desire, that of preserving our lives, which each of us believed
+to be threatened. You had your neighbour's head cut off so that
+your neighbour should not have you yourself guillotined.''
+
+The history of the Convention constitutes one of the most
+striking examples that could be given of the influence of leaders
+and of fear upon an assembly.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER IV
+
+THE GOVERNMENT OF THE CONVENTION
+
+1. The activity of the Clubs and the Commune during the
+Convention.
+
+During the whole of its existence the Convention was governed by
+the leaders of the clubs and of the Commune.
+
+We have already seen what was their influence on the preceding
+Assemblies. It became overwhelming during the Convention. The
+history of this latter is in reality that of the clubs and the
+Commune which dominated it. They enslaved, not only the
+Convention, but also all France. Numerous little provincial
+clubs, directed by that of the capital, supervised magistrates,
+denounced suspects, and undertook the execution of all the
+revolutionary orders.
+
+When the clubs or the Commune had decided upon certain measures
+they had them voted by the Assembly then and there. If the
+Assembly resisted, they sent their armed delegations thither--
+that is, armed bands recruited from the scum of the populace.
+They conveyed injunctions which were always slavishly obeyed.
+The Commune was so sure of its strength that it even demanded of
+the Convention the immediate expulsion of deputies who displeased
+it.
+
+While the Convention was composed generally of educated
+men, the members of the Commune and the clubs comprised a
+majority of small shopkeepers, labourers, and artisans, incapable
+of personal opinions, and always guided by their leaders--Danton,
+Camille Desmoulins, Robespierre, &c.
+
+Of the two powers, clubs and insurrectionary Commune, the latter
+exercised the greater influence in Paris, because it had made for
+itself a revolutionary army. It held under its orders forty-
+eight committees of National Guards, who asked nothing more than
+to kill, sack, and, above all, plunder.
+
+The tyranny with which the Commune crushed Paris was frightful.
+For example, it delegated to a certain cobbler, Chalandon by
+name, the right of surveillance over a portion of the capital--a
+right implying the power to send to the Revolutionary Tribunal,
+and therefore to the guillotine, all those whom he suspected.
+Certain streets were thus almost depopulated by him.
+
+The Convention struggled feebly against the Commune at the
+outset, but did not prolong its resistance. The culminating
+point of the conflict occurred when the Convention wished to
+arrest Hebert, the friend of the Commune, and the latter sent
+armed bands who threatened the Assembly and demanded the
+expulsion of the Girondists who had provoked the measure. Upon
+the Convention refusing the Commune besieged it on June 2, 1798,
+by means of its revolutionary army, which was under the orders of
+Hanriot. Terrified, the Assembly gave up twenty-seven of its
+members. The Commune immediately sent a delegation ironically to
+felicitate it upon its obedience.
+
+After the fall of the Girondists the Convention submitted itself
+completely to the injunctions of the omnipotent Commune. The
+latter decreed the levy of a revolutionary army, to be
+accompanied by a tribunal and a guillotine, which was to traverse
+the whole of France in order to execute suspects.
+
+Only towards the end of its existence, after the fall of
+Robespierre, did the Convention contrive to escape from the yoke
+of the Jacobins and the Commune. It closed the Jacobin club and
+guillotined its leading members.
+
+Despite such sanctions the leaders still continued to excite the
+populace and hurl it against the Convention. In Germinal and
+Prairial it underwent regular sieges. Armed delegations even
+succeeded in forcing the Convention to vote the re-establishment
+of the Commune and the convocation of a new Assembly, a measure
+which the Convention hastened to annul the moment the insurgents
+had withdrawn. Ashamed of its fear, it sent for regiments which
+disarmed the faubourgs and made nearly ten thousand arrests.
+Twenty-six leaders of the movement were put to death, and six
+deputies who were concerned in the riot were guillotined.
+
+But the Convention did not resist to any purpose. When it was no
+longer led by the clubs and the Commune it obeyed the Committee
+of Public Safety and voted its decrees without discussion.
+
+``The Convention,'' writes H. Williams, ``which spoke of nothing
+less than having all the princes and kings of Europe brought to
+its feet loaded with chains, was made prisoner in its own
+sanctuary by a handful of mercenaries.''
+
+
+2. The Government of France during the Convention--The Terror.
+
+
+As soon as it assembled in 1792 the Convention began by decreeing
+the abolition of royalty, and in spite of the hesitation of a
+great number of its members, who knew that the provinces were
+royalist, it proclaimed the Republic.
+
+Intimately persuaded that such a proclamation would transform the
+civilised world, it instituted a new era and a new calendar. The
+year I. of this era marked the dawn of a world in which reason
+alone was to reign. It was inaugurated by the trial of Louis
+XVI., a measure which was ordered by the Commune, but which the
+majority of the Convention did not desire.
+
+At its outset, in fact, the Convention was governed by its
+relatively moderate elements, the Girondists. The president and
+the secretaries had been chosen among the best known of this
+party. Robespierre, who was later to become the absolute master
+of the Convention, possessed so little influence at this time
+that he obtained only six votes for the presidency, while
+Petion received two hundred and thirty-five.
+
+The Montagnards had at first only a very slight influence. Their
+power was of later growth. When they were in power there was no
+longer room in the Convention for moderate members.
+
+Despite their minority the Montagnards found a way to force the
+Assembly to bring Louis to trial. This was at once a victory
+over the Girondists, the condemnation of all kings, and a final
+divorce between the old order and the new.
+
+To bring about the trial they manoeuvred very skilfully,
+bombarding the Convention with petitions from the provinces, and
+sending a deputation from the insurrectional Commune of Paris,
+which demanded a trial.
+
+According to a characteristic common to the Assemblies of the
+Revolution, that of yielding to threats and always doing the
+contrary of what they wished, the men of the Convention dared not
+resist. The trial was decided upon.
+
+The Girondists, who individually would not have wished for the
+death of the king, voted for it out of fear once they were
+assembled. Hoping to save his own head, the Duc d'Orleans,
+Louis' cousin, voted with them. If, on mounting the scaffold on
+January 21, 1793, Louis had had that vision of the future which
+we attribute to the gods, he would have seen following him, one
+by one, the greater number of the Girondists whose weakness had
+been unable to defend him.
+
+Regarded only from the purely utilitarian point of view, the
+execution of the king was one of the mistakes of the Revolution.
+It engendered civil war and armed Europe against France. In the
+Convention itself his death gave rise to intestine struggles,
+which finally led to the triumph of the Montagnards and the
+expulsion of the Girondists.
+
+The measures passed under the influence of the Montagnards
+finally became so despotic that sixty departments, comprising the
+West and the South, revolted. The insurrection, which was headed
+by many of the expelled deputies, would perhaps have succeeded
+had not the compromising assistance of the royalists caused men
+to fear the return of the ancien regime. At Toulon, in fact, the
+insurgents acclaimed Louis XVII.
+
+The civil war thus begun lasted during the greater part of the
+life of the Revolution. It was fought with the utmost savagery.
+Old men, women, children, all were massacred, and villages and
+crops were burned. In the Vendee alone the number of the killed
+was reckoned at something between half a million and a million.
+
+Civil war was soon followed by foreign war. The Jacobins thought
+to remedy all these ills by creating a new Constitution. It was
+always a tradition with all the revolutionary assemblies to
+believe in the magic virtues of formula. In France this
+conviction has never been affected by the failure of experiments.
+
+``A robust faith,'' writes one of the great admirers of the
+Revolution, M. Rambaud, ``sustained the Convention in this
+labour; it believed firmly that when it had formulated in a law
+the principles of the Revolution its enemies would be confounded,
+or, still better, converted, and that the advent of justice would
+disarm the insurgents.''
+
+During its lifetime the Convention drafted two Constitutions--
+that of 1793, or the year I., and that of 1795, or the year III.
+The first was never applied, an absolute dictatorship very soon
+replacing it; the second created the Directory.
+
+The Convention contained a large number of lawyers and men of
+affairs, who promptly comprehended the impossibility of
+government by means of a large Assembly. They soon divided the
+Convention into small committees, each of which had an
+independent existence--business committees, committees of
+legislation, finance, agriculture, arts, &c. These committees
+prepared the laws which the Assembly usually voted with its eyes
+closed.
+
+Thanks to them, the work of the Convention was not purely
+destructive. They drafted many very useful measures, creating
+important colleges, establishing the metric system, &c. The
+majority of the members of the Assembly, as we have already seen,
+took refuge in these committees in order to evade the political
+conflict which would have endangered their heads.
+
+Above the business committees, which had nothing to do with
+politics, was the Committee of Public Safety, instituted in
+April, 1793, and composed of nine members. Directed at first by
+Danton, and in the July of the same year by Robespierre, it
+gradually absorbed all the powers of government, including that
+of giving orders to ministers and generals. Carnot directed the
+operations of the war, Cambon the finances, and Saint-Just and
+Collot-d'Herbois the general policy.
+
+Although the laws voted by the technical committees were often
+very wise, and constituted the lasting work of the Convention,
+those which the Assembly voted in a body under the threats of the
+delegations which invaded it were manifestly ridiculous.
+
+Among these laws, which were not greatly in the interests of the
+public or of the Convention itself, were the law of the maximum,
+voted in September, 1793, which pretended to fix the price of
+provisions, and which merely established a continual dearth; the
+destruction of the royal tombs at Saint-Denis; the trial
+of the queen, the systematic devastation of the Vendee by
+fire, the establishment of the Revolutionary Tribunal, &c.
+
+The Terror was the chief means of government during the
+Convention. Commencing in September, 1793, it reigned for six
+months--that is, until the death of Robespierre. Vainly did
+certain Jacobins-- Danton, Camille Desmoulins, Herault de
+Sechelles, &c.--propose that clemency should be given a trial.
+The only result of this proposition was that its authors were
+sent to the scaffold. It was merely the lassitude of the public
+that finally put an end to this shameful period.
+
+The successive struggles of the various parties in the Convention
+and its tendency towards extremes eliminated one by one the men
+of importance who had once played their part therein. Finally it
+fell under the exclusive domination of Robespierre. While the
+Convention was disorganising and ravaging France, the armies were
+winning brilliant victories. They had seized the left bank of
+the Rhine, Belgium, and Holland. The treaty of Basle ratified
+these conquests.
+
+We have already mentioned, and we shall return to the matter
+again, that the work of the armies must be considered absolutely
+apart from that of the Convention. Contemporaries understood
+this perfectly, but to-day it is often forgotten.
+
+When the Convention was dissolved, in 1795, after lasting for
+three years, it was regarded with universal distrust. The
+perpetual plaything of popular caprice, it had not succeeded in
+pacifying France, but had plunged her into anarchy. The
+general opinion respecting the Convention is well summed up in a
+letter written in July, 1799, by the Swedish charge
+d'affaires, Baron Drinkmann: ``I venture to hope that no people
+will ever be governed by the will of more cruel and imbecile
+scoundrels than those that have ruled France since the beginning
+of her new liberty.''
+
+
+3. The End of the Convention. The Beginnings of the Directory.
+
+
+At the end of its existence, the Convention, always trusting to
+the power of formulae, drafted a new Constitution, that of the
+year III., intended to replace that of 1793, which had never been
+put into execution. The legislative power was to be shared by a
+so-called Council of Ancients composed of 150 members, and a
+council of deputies numbering 500. The executive power was
+confided to a Directory of five members, who were appointed by
+the Ancients upon nomination by the Five Hundred, and renewed
+every year by the election of one of their number. It was
+specified that two-thirds of the members of the new Assembly
+should be chosen from among the deputies of the Convention. This
+prudent measure was not very efficacious, as only ten departments
+remained faithful to the Jacobins.
+
+To avoid the election of royalists, the Convention had decided to
+banish all emigres in perpetuity.
+
+The announcement of this Constitution did not produce the
+anticipated effect upon the public. It had no effect upon the
+popular riots, which continued. One of the most important was
+that which threatened the Convention on the 5th of October, 1795.
+
+The leaders hurled a veritable army upon the Assembly.
+Before such provocation, the Convention finally decided to defend
+itself, and sent for troops, entrusting the command to Barras.
+
+Bonaparte, who was then beginning to emerge from obscurity, was
+entrusted with the task of repression. With such a leader action
+was swift and energetic. Vigorously pounded with ball near the
+church at St. Roch, the insurgents fled, leaving some hundreds of
+dead on the spot.
+
+This action, which displayed a firmness to which the Convention
+was little habituated, was only due to the celerity of the
+military operations, for while these were being carried out the
+insurgents had sent delegates to the Assembly, which, as usual,
+showed itself quite ready to yield to them.
+
+The repression of this riot constituted the last important act of
+the Convention. On the 26th of October, 1795, it declared its
+mission terminated, and gave way to the Directory.
+
+We have already laid stress upon some of the psychological
+lessons furnished by the government of the Convention. One of
+the most striking of these is the impotence of violence to
+dominate men's minds in permanence.
+
+Never did any Government possess such formidable means of action,
+yet in spite of the permanent guillotine, despite the delegates
+sent with the guillotine into the provinces, despite its
+Draconian laws, the Convention had to struggle perpetually
+against riots, insurrections, and conspiracies. The cities, the
+departments, and the faubourgs of Paris were continually rising
+in revolt, although heads were falling by the thousand.
+
+This Assembly, which thought itself sovereign, fought against the
+invincible forces which were fixed in men's minds, and which
+material constraint was powerless to overcome. Of these hidden
+motive forces it never understood the power, and it struggled
+against them in vain. In the end the invisible forces triumphed.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER V
+
+INSTANCES OF REVOLUTIONARY VIOLENCE
+
+1. Psychological Causes of Revolutionary Violence.
+
+We have shown in the course of the preceding chapters that the
+revolutionary theories constituted a new faith.
+
+Humanitarian and sentimental, they exalted liberty and
+fraternity. But, as in many religions, we can observe a complete
+contradiction between doctrine and action. In practice no
+liberty was tolerated, and fraternity was quickly replaced by
+frenzied massacres.
+
+This opposition between principles and conduct results from the
+intolerance which accompanies all beliefs. A religion may be
+steeped in humanitarianism and forbearance, but its sectaries
+will always want to impose it on others by force, so that
+violence is the inevitable result.
+
+The cruelties of the Revolution were thus the inherent results of
+the propagation of the new dogmas. The Inquisition, the
+religious wars of France, St. Bartholomew's Day, the revocation
+of the Edict of Nantes, the ``Dragonnades,'' the persecution of
+the Jansenists, &c., belonged to the same family as the Terror
+and derived from the same psychological sources.
+
+Louis XIV. was not a cruel king, yet under the impulse of
+his faith he drove hundreds of thousands of Protestants out of
+France, after first shooting down a considerable number and
+sending others to the galleys.
+
+The methods of persuasion adopted by all believers are by no
+means a consequence of their fear of the dissentient opposition.
+Protestants and Jansenists were anything but dangerous under
+Louis XIV. Intolerance arises above all from the indignation
+experienced by a mind which is convinced that it possesses the
+most dazzling verities against the men who deny those truths, and
+who are surely not acting in good faith. How can one support
+error when one has the necessary strength to wipe it out?
+
+Thus have reasoned the believers of all ages. Thus reasoned
+Louis XIV. and the men of the Terror. These latter also were
+convinced that they were in possession of absolute truths, which
+they believed to be obvious, and whose triumph was certain to
+regenerate humanity. Could they be more tolerant toward their
+adversaries than the Church and the kings of France had been
+toward heretics?
+
+We are forced to believe that terror is a method which all
+believers regard as a necessity, since from the beginning of the
+ages religious codes have always been based upon terror. To
+force men to observe their prescriptions, believers have sought
+to terrify them with threats of an eternal hell of torments.
+
+The apostles of the Jacobin belief behaved as their fathers had
+done, and employed the same methods. If similar events occurred
+again we should see identical actions repeated. If a new
+belief--Socialism, for example--were to triumph to-morrow, it
+would be led to employ methods of propaganda like those of
+the Inquisition and the Terror.
+
+But were we to regard the Jacobin Terror solely as the result of
+a religious movement, we should not completely apprehend it.
+Around a triumphant religious belief, as we saw in the case of
+the Reformation, gather a host of individual interests which are
+dependent on that belief. The Terror was directed by a few
+fanatical apostles, but beside this small number of ardent
+proselytes, whose narrow minds dreamed of regenerating the world,
+were great numbers of men who lived only to enrich themselves.
+They rallied readily around the first victorious leader who
+promised to enable them to enjoy the results of their pillage.
+
+``The Terrorists of the Revolution,'' writes Albert Sorel,
+``resorted to the Terror because they wished to remain in power,
+and were incapable of doing so by other means. They employed it
+for their own salvation, and after the event they stated that
+their motive was the salvation of the State. Before it became a
+system it was a means of government, and the system was only
+invented to justify the means.''
+
+We may thus fully agree with the following verdict on the Terror,
+written by Emile Ollivier in his work on the Revolution: ``The
+Terror was above all a Jacquerie, a regularised pillage, the
+vastest enterprise of theft that any association of criminals has
+ever organised.''
+
+
+2. The Revolutionary Tribunals.
+
+
+The Revolutionary Tribunals constituted the principal means of
+action of the Terror. Besides that of Paris, created at the
+instigation of Danton, and which a year afterwards sent
+its founder to the guillotine, France was covered with
+such tribunals.
+
+``One hundred and seventy-eight tribunals,'' says Taine, ``of
+which 40 were perambulant, pronounced death sentences in all
+parts of the country, which were carried out instantly on the
+spot. Between the 16th of April, 1793, and the 9th of Thermidor
+in the year II. that of Paris guillotined 2,625 persons, and the
+provincial judges worked as hard as those of Paris. In the
+little town of Orange alone 331 persons were guillotined. In the
+city of Arras 299 men and 93 women were guillotined. . . . In
+the city of Lyons alone the revolutionary commissioner admitted
+to 1,684 executions. . . . The total number of these murders has
+been put at 17,000, among whom were 1,200 women, of whom a number
+were octogenarians.''
+
+Although the Revolutionary Tribunal of Paris claimed only 2,625
+victims, it must not be forgotten that all the suspects had
+already been summarily massacred during the ``days'' of
+September.
+
+The Revolutionary Tribunal of Paris, a mere instrument of the
+Committee of Public Safety, limited itself in reality, as
+Fouquier-Tinville justly remarked during his trial, to executing
+its orders. It surrounded itself at first with a few legal forms
+which did not long survive. Interrogatory, defence, witnesses--
+all were finally suppressed. Moral proof--that is, mere
+suspicion--sufficed to procure condemnation. The president
+usually contented himself with putting a vague question to the
+accused. To work more rapidly still, Fouquier-Tinville proposed
+to have the guillotine installed on the same premises as the
+Tribunal.
+
+This Tribunal sent indiscriminately to the scaffold all the
+accused persons arrested by reason of party hatred, and very
+soon, in the hands of Robespierre, it constituted an instrument
+of the bloodiest tyranny. When Danton, one of its founders,
+became its victim, he justly asked pardon of God and men, before
+mounting the scaffold for having assisted to create such a
+Tribunal.
+
+Nothing found mercy before it: neither the genius of Lavoisier,
+nor the gentleness of Lucile Desmoulins, nor the merit of
+Malesherbes. ``So much talent,'' said Benjamin Constant,
+``massacred by the most cowardly and brutish of men!''
+
+To find any excuse for the Revolutionary Tribunal, we must return
+to our conception of the religious mentality of the Jacobins, who
+founded and directed it. It was a piece of work comparable in
+its spirit and its aim to the Inquisition. The men who furnished
+its victims--Robespierre, Saint-Just, and Couthon--believed
+themselves the benefactors of the human race in suppressing all
+infidels, the enemies of the faith that was to regenerate the
+earth.
+
+The executions during the Terror did not affect the members of
+the aristocracy only, since 4,000 peasants and 3,000 working-men
+were guillotined.
+
+Given the emotion produced in Paris in our days by a capital
+execution, one might suppose that the execution of so many
+persons at one time would produce a very great emotion. But
+habit had so dulled sensibility that people paid but little
+attention to the matter at last. Mothers would take their
+children to see people guillotined as to-day they take them to
+the marionette theatre.
+
+The daily spectacle of executions made the men of the time
+very indifferent to death. All mounted the scaffold with perfect
+tranquillity, the Girondists singing the Marseillaise as they
+climbed the steps.
+
+This resignation resulted from the law of habitude, which very
+rapidly dulls emotion. To judge by the fact that royalist
+risings were taking place daily, the prospect of the guillotine
+no longer terrified men. Things happened as though the Terror
+terrorised no one. Terror is an efficacious psychological
+process so long as it does not last. The real terror resides far
+more in threats than in their realisation.
+
+
+3. The Terror in the Provinces.
+
+
+The executions of the Revolutionary Tribunals in the provinces
+represented only a portion of the massacres effected in the
+departments during the Terror. The revolutionary army, composed
+of vagabonds and brigands, marched through France killing and
+pillaging. Its method of procedure is well indicated by the
+following passage from Taine:--
+
+``At Bedouin, a town of 2,000 inhabitants, where unknown hands
+had cut down the tree of liberty, 433 houses were demolished or
+fired, 16 persons were guillotined, and 47 shot down; all the
+other inhabitants were expelled and reduced to living as
+vagabonds in the mountains, and to taking shelter in caverns
+which they hollowed out of the earth.''
+
+The fate of the wretches sent before the Revolutionary Tribunals
+was no better. The first mockery of trial was quickly
+suppressed. At Nantes, Carrier drowned and shot down according
+to his fancy nearly 5,000 persons--men, women, and children.
+
+The details of these massacres figured in the Moniteur
+after the reaction of Thermidor. I cite a few lines:--
+
+``I saw,'' says Thomas, ``after the taking of Noirmoutier, men
+and women and old people burned alive . . . women violated, girls
+of fourteen and fifteen, and massacred afterward, and tender
+babes thrown from bayonet to bayonet; children who were taken
+from beside their mothers stretched out on the ground.''
+
+In the same number we read a deposition by one Julien, relating
+how Carrier forced his victims to dig their graves and to allow
+themselves to be buried alive. The issue of October 15, 1794,
+contained a report by Merlin de Thionville proving that the
+captain of the vessel le Destin had received orders to embark
+forty-one victims to be drowned--``among them a blind man of 78,
+twelve women, twelve girls, and fourteen children, of whom ten
+were from 10 to 6 and five at the breast.''
+
+In the course of Carrier's trial (Moniteur, December 30, 1794)
+it was proved that he ``had given orders to drown and shoot women
+and children, and had ordered General Haxo to exterminate all the
+inhabitants of La Vendee and to burn down their dwellings.''
+
+Carrier, like all wholesale murderers, took an intense joy in
+seeing his victims suffer. ``In the department in which I hunted
+the priests,'' he said, ``I have never laughed so much or
+experienced such pleasure as in watching their dying grimaces''
+(Moniteur, December 22, 1794).
+
+Carrier was tried to satisfy the reaction of Thermidor. But
+the massacres of Nantes were repeated in many other towns.
+Fouche slew more than 2,000 persons at Lyons, and so many were
+killed at Toulon that the population fell from 29,000 to 7,000 in
+a few months.
+
+We must say in defence of Carrier, Freron, Fouche and all
+these sinister persons, that they were incessantly stimulated by
+the Committee of Public Safety. Carrier gave proof of this
+during his trial.
+
+``I admit,'' said he (Moniteur, December 24, 1794), ``that 150
+or 200 prisoners were shot every day, but it was by order of the
+commission. I informed the Convention that the brigands were
+being shot down by hundreds, and it applauded this letter, and
+ordered its insertion in the Bulletin. What were these deputies
+doing then who are so furious against me now? They were
+applauding. Why did they still keep me `on mission'? Because I
+was then the saviour of the country, and now I am a bloodthirsty
+man.''
+
+Unhappily for him, Carrier did not know, as he remarked in the
+same speech, that only seven or eight persons led the Convention.
+
+But the terrorised Assembly approved of all that these seven or
+eight ordered, so that they could say nothing in reply to
+Carrier's argument. He certainly deserved to be guillotined, but
+the whole Convention deserved to be guillotined with him, since
+it had approved of the massacres.
+
+The defence of Carrier, justified by the letters of the
+Committee, by which the representatives ``on mission'' were
+incessantly stimulated, shows that the violence of the Terror
+resulted from a system, and not, as has sometimes been claimed,
+from the initiative of a few individuals.
+
+The thirst for destruction during the Terror was by no means
+assuaged by the destruction of human beings only; there was an
+even greater destruction of inanimate things. The true believer
+is always an iconoclast. Once in power, he destroys with equal
+zeal the enemies of his faith and the images, temples, and
+symbols which recall the faith attacked.
+
+We know that the first action of the Emperor Theodosius when
+converted to the Christian religion was to break down the
+majority of the temples which for six thousand years had been
+built beside the Nile. We must not, therefore, be surprised to
+see the leaders of the Revolution attacking the monuments and
+works of art which for them were the vestiges of an abhorred
+past.
+
+Statues, manuscripts, stained glass windows, and plate were
+frenziedly broken. When Fouche, the future Duke of Otranto
+under Napoleon, and minister under Louis XVIII., was sent as
+commissary of the Convention to the Nievre, he ordered the
+demolition of all the towers of the chateaux and the
+belfries of the churches ``because they wounded equality.''
+
+Revolutionary vandalism expended itself even on the tomb.
+Following a report read by Barrere to the Convention, the
+magnificent royal tombs at Saint-Denis, among which was the
+admirable mausoleum of Henri II., by Germain Pilon, were smashed
+to pieces, the coffins emptied, and the body of Turenne sent to
+the Museum as a curiosity, after one of the keepers had extracted
+the teeth in order to sell them as curiosities. The moustache
+and beard of Henri IV. were also torn out.
+
+It is impossible to witness such comparatively enlightened
+men consenting to the destruction of the artistic patriotism of
+France without a feeling of sadness. To excuse them, we must
+remember that intense beliefs give rise to the worst excesses,
+and also that the Convention, almost daily invaded by rioters,
+always yielded to the popular will.
+
+This glowing record of devastation proves, not only the power of
+fanaticism: it shows us what becomes of men who are liberated
+from all social restraints, and of the country which falls into
+their hands.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER VI
+
+THE ARMIES OF THE REVOLUTION
+
+1. The Revolutionary Assemblies and the Armies.
+
+If nothing were known of the revolutionary Assemblies, and
+notably of the Convention, beyond their internal dissensions,
+their weakness, and their acts of violence, their memory would
+indeed be a gloomy one.
+
+But even for its enemies this bloodstained epoch must always
+retain an undeniable glory, thanks to the success of its armies.
+When the Convention dissolved France was already the greater by
+Belgium and the territories on the left bank of the Rhine.
+
+Regarding the Convention as a whole, it seems equitable to credit
+it with the victories of the armies of France, but if we analyse
+this whole in order to study each of its elements separately
+their independence will at once be obvious. It is at once
+apparent that the Convention had a very small share in the
+military events of the time. The armies on the frontier and the
+revolutionary Assemblies in Paris formed two separate worlds,
+which had very little influence over one another, and which
+regarded matters in a very different light.
+
+We have seen that the Convention was a weak Government, which
+changed its ideas daily, according to popular impulse; it was
+really an example of the profoundest anarchy. It directed
+nothing, but was itself continually directed; how, then, could it
+have commanded armies?
+
+Completely absorbed in its intestine quarrels, the Assembly had
+abandoned all military questions to a special committee, which
+was directed almost single-handed by Carnot, and whose real
+function was to furnish the troops with provisions and
+ammunition. The merit of Carnot consisted in the fact that
+besides directing over 752,000 men at the disposal of France,
+upon points which were strategically valuable, he also advised
+the generals of the armies to take the offensive, and to preserve
+a strict discipline.
+
+The sole share of the Assembly in the defence of the country was
+the decree of the general levy. In the face of the numerous
+enemies then threatening France, no Government could have avoided
+such a measure. For some little time, too, the Assembly had sent
+representatives to the armies instructed to decapitate certain
+generals, but this policy was soon abandoned.
+
+As a matter of fact the military activities of the Assembly were
+always extremely slight. The armies, thanks to their numbers,
+their enthusiasm, and the tactics devised by their youthful
+generals, achieved their victories unaided. They fought and
+conquered independently of the Convention.
+
+
+2. The Struggle of Europe against the Revolution.
+
+
+Before enumerating the various psychological factors which
+contributed to the successes of the revolutionary armies, it will
+be useful briefly to recall the origin and the development of the
+war against Europe.
+
+At the commencement of the Revolution the foreign sovereigns
+regarded with satisfaction the difficulties of the French
+monarchy, which they had long regarded as a rival power. The
+King of Prussia, believing France to be greatly enfeebled,
+thought to enrich himself at her expense, so he proposed to the
+Emperor of Austria to help Louis on condition of receiving
+Flanders and Alsace as an indemnity. The two sovereigns signed
+an alliance against France in February, 1792. The French
+anticipated attack by declaring war upon Austria, under the
+influence of the Girondists. The French army was at the outset
+subjected to several checks. The allies penetrated into
+Champagne, and came within 130 miles of Paris. Dumouriez'
+victory at Valmy forced them to retire.
+
+Although 300 French and 200 Prussians only were killed in this
+battle, it had very significant results. The fact that an army
+reputed invincible had been forced to retreat gave boldness to
+the young revolutionary troops, and everywhere they took the
+offensive. In a few weeks the soldiers of Valmy had chased the
+Austrians out of Belgium, where they were welcomed as liberators.
+
+But it was under the Convention that the war assumed such
+importance. At the beginning of 1793 the Assembly declared that
+Belgium was united to France. From this resulted a conflict with
+England which lasted for twenty-two years.
+
+Assembled at Antwerp in April, 1793, the representatives of
+England, Prussia, and Austria resolved to dismember France. The
+Prussians were to seize Alsace and Lorraine; the Austrians,
+Flanders and Artois; the English, Dunkirk. The Austrian
+ambassador proposed to crush the Revolution by terror,
+``by exterminating practically the whole of the party directing
+the nation.'' In the face of such declarations France had
+perforce to conquer or to perish.
+
+During this first coalition, between 1793 and 1797, France had to
+fight on all her frontiers, from the Pyrenees to the north.
+
+At the outset she lost her former conquests, and suffered several
+reverses. The Spaniards took Perpignan and Bayonne; the English,
+Toulon; and the Austrians, Valenciennes. It was then that the
+Convention, towards the end of 1793, ordered a general levy of
+all Frenchmen between the ages of eighteen and forty, and
+succeeded in sending to the frontiers a total of some 750,000
+men. The old regiments of the royal army were combined with
+battalions of volunteers and conscripts.
+
+The allies were repulsed, and Maubeuge was relieved after the
+victory of Wattigny, which was gained by Jourdan. Hoche rescued
+Lorraine. France took the offensive, reconquering Belgium and
+the left bank of the Rhine. Jourdan defeated the Austrians at
+Fleurus, drove them back upon the Rhine, and occupied Cologne and
+Coblentz. Holland was invaded. The allied sovereigns resigned
+themselves to suing for peace, and recognised the French
+conquests.
+
+The successes of the French were favoured by the fact that the
+enemy never put their whole heart into the affair, as they were
+preoccupied by the partition of Poland, which they effected in
+1793-5. Each Power wished to be on the spot in order to obtain
+more territory. This motive had already caused the King
+of Prussia to retire after the battle of Valmy in 1792.
+
+The hesitations of the allies and their mutual distrust were
+extremely advantageous to the French. Had the Austrians marched
+upon Paris in the summer of 1793, ``we should,'' said General
+Thiebault, ``have lost a hundred times for one. They alone
+saved us, by giving us time to make soldiers, officers, and
+generals.''
+
+After the treaty of Basle, France had no important adversaries on
+the Continent, save the Austrians. It was then that the
+Directory attacked Austria in Italy. Bonaparte was entrusted
+with the charge of this campaign. After a year of fighting, from
+April, 1796, to April, 1797, he forced the last enemies of France
+to demand peace.
+
+
+3. Psychological and Military Factors which determined the
+Success of the Revolutionary Armies.
+
+
+To realise the causes of the success of the revolutionary armies
+we must remember the prodigious enthusiasm, endurance, and
+abnegation of these ragged and often barefoot troops. Thoroughly
+steeped in revolutionary principles, they felt that they were the
+apostles of a new religion, which was destined to regenerate the
+world.
+
+The history of the armies of the Revolution recalls that of the
+nomads of Arabia, who, excited to fanaticism by the ideals of
+Mohammed, were transformed into formidable armies which rapidly
+conquered a portion of the old Roman world. An analogous faith
+endowed the Republican soldiers with a heroism and intrepidity
+which never failed them, and which no reverse could shake
+When the Convention gave place to the Directory they had
+liberated the country, and had carried a war of invasion into the
+enemy's territory. At this period the soldiers were the only
+true Republicans left in France.
+
+Faith is contagious, and the Revolution was regarded as a new
+era, so that several of the nations invaded, oppressed by the
+absolutism of their monarchs, welcomed the invaders as
+liberators. The inhabitants of Savoy ran out to meet the troops.
+
+At Mayence the crowd welcomed them with enthusiasm planted trees
+of liberty, and formed a Convention in imitation of that of
+Paris.
+
+So long as the armies of the Revolution had to deal with peoples
+bent under the yoke of absolute monarchy, and having no personal
+ideal to defend, their success was relatively easy. But when
+they entered into conflict with peoples who had an ideal as
+strong as their own victory became far more difficult.
+
+The new ideal of liberty and equality was capable of seducing
+peoples who had no precise convictions, and were suffering from
+the despotism of their masters, but it was naturally powerless
+against those who possessed a potent ideal of their own which had
+been long established in their minds. For this reason Bretons
+and Vendeeans, whose religious and monarchical sentiments were
+extremely powerful, successfully struggled for years against the
+armies of the Republic.
+
+In March, 1793, the insurrections of the Vendee and Brittany
+had spread to ten departments. The Vendeeans in Poitou
+and the Chouans in Brittany put 80,000 men in the field.
+
+The conflicts between contrary ideals--that is, between beliefs
+in which reason can play no part--are always pitiless, and the
+struggle with the Vendee immediately assumed the ferocious
+savagery always observable in religious wars. It lasted until
+the end of 1795, when Hoche finally ``pacified'' the country.
+This pacification was the simple result of the practical
+extermination of its defenders.
+
+``After two years of civil war,'' writes Molinari, ``the
+Vendee was no more than a hideous heap of ruins. About
+900,000 individuals--men, women, children, and aged people--had
+perished, and the small number of those who had escaped massacre
+could scarcely find food or shelter. The fields were devastated,
+the hedges and walls destroyed, and the houses burned.''
+
+Besides their faith, which so often rendered them invincible, the
+soldiers of the Revolution had usually the advantage of being led
+by remarkable generals, full of ardour and formed on the battle-
+field.
+
+The majority of the former leaders of the army, being nobles, had
+emigrated so that a new body of officers had to be organised.
+The result was that those gifted with innate military aptitudes
+had a chance of showing them, and passed through all the grades
+of rank in a few months. Hoche, for instance, a corporal in
+1789, was a general of division and commander of an army at the
+age of twenty-five. The extreme youth of these leaders resulted
+in a spirit of aggression to which the armies opposed to them
+were not accustomed. Selected only according to merit,
+and hampered by no traditions, no routine, they quickly succeeded
+in working out a tactics suited to the new necessities.
+
+Of soldiers without experience opposed to seasoned professional
+troops, drilled and trained according to the methods in use
+everywhere since the Seven Years' War, one could not expect
+complicated manoeuvres.
+
+Attacks were delivered simply by great masses of troops. Thanks
+to the numbers of the men at the disposal of their generals, the
+considerable gaps provoked by this efficacious but barbarous
+procedure could be rapidly filled.
+
+Deep masses of men attacked the enemy with the bayonet, and
+quickly routed men accustomed to methods which were more careful
+of the lives of soldiers. The slow rate of fire in those days
+rendered the French tactics relatively easy of employment. It
+triumphed, but at the cost of enormous losses. It has been
+calculated that between 1792 and 1800 the French army left more
+than a third of its effective force on the battle-field (700,000
+men out of 2,000,000).
+
+Examining events from a psychological point of view, we shall
+continue to elicit the consequences from the facts on which they
+are consequent.
+
+A study of the revolutionary crowds in Paris and in the armies
+presents very different but readily interpreted pictures.
+
+We have proved that crowds, unable to reason, obey simply their
+impulses, which are always changing, but we have also seen that
+they are readily capable of heroism, that their altruism is often
+highly developed, and that it is easy to find thousands of
+men ready to give their lives for a belief.
+
+Psychological characteristics so diverse must naturally,
+according to the circumstances, lead to dissimilar and even
+absolutely contradictory actions. The history of the Convention
+and its armies proves as much. It shows us crowds composed of
+similar elements acting so differently in Paris and on the
+frontiers that one can hardly believe the same people can be in
+question.
+
+In Paris the crowds were disorderly, violent, murderous, and so
+changeable in their demands as to make all government impossible.
+
+In the armies the picture was entirely different. The same
+multitudes of unaccustomed men, restrained by the orderly
+elements of a laborious peasant population, standardised by
+military discipline, and inspired by contagious enthusiasm,
+heroically supported privations, disdained perils, and
+contributed to form that fabulous strain which triumphed over the
+most redoubtable troops in Europe.
+
+These facts are among those which should always be invoked to
+show the force of discipline. It transforms men. Liberated from
+its influence, peoples and armies become barbarian hordes.
+
+This truth is daily and increasingly forgotten. Ignoring the
+fundamental laws of collective logic, we give way more and more
+to shifting popular impulses, instead of learning to direct them.
+
+The multitude must be shown the road to follow; it is not for
+them to choose it.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER VII
+
+PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LEADERS OF THE REVOLUTION
+
+
+1. Mentality of the Men of the Revolution. The respective
+Influence of Violent and Feeble Characters.
+
+Men judge with their intelligence, and are guided by their
+characters. To understand a man fully one must separate these
+two elements.
+
+During the great periods of activity--and the revolutionary
+movements naturally belong to such periods--character always
+takes the first rank.
+
+Having in several chapters described the various mentalities
+which predominate in times of disturbance, we need not return to
+the subject now. They constitute general types which are
+naturally modified by each man's inherited and acquired
+personality.
+
+We have seen what an important part was played by the mystic
+element in the Jacobin mentality, and the ferocious fanaticism to
+which it led the sectaries of the new faith.
+
+We have also seen that all the members of the Assemblies were not
+fanatics. These latter were even in the minority, since in the
+most sanguinary of the revolutionary assemblies the great
+majority was composed of timid and moderate men of neutral
+character. Before Thermidor the members of this group
+voted from fear with the violent and after Thermidor with the
+moderate deputies.
+
+In time of revolution, as at other times, these neutral
+characters, obeying the most contrary impulses, are always the
+most numerous. They are also as dangerous in reality as the
+violent characters. The force of the latter is supported by the
+weakness of the former.
+
+In all revolutions, and in particularly in the French Revolution,
+we observe a small minority of narrow but decided minds which
+imperiously dominate an immense majority of men who are often
+very intelligent but are lacking in character
+
+Besides the fanatical apostles and the feeble characters, a
+revolution always produces individuals who merely think how to
+profit thereby. These were numerous during the French
+Revolution. Their aim was simply to utilise circumstances so as
+to enrich themselves. Such were Barras, Tallien, Fouche,
+Barrere, and many more. Their politics consisted simply in
+serving the strong against the weak.
+
+From the outset of the Revolution these ``arrivists,'' as one
+would call them to-day, were numerous. Camille Desmoulins wrote
+in 1792: ``Our Revolution has its roots only in the egotism and
+self-love of each individual, of the combination of which the
+general interest is composed.''
+
+If we add to these indications the observations contained in
+another chapter concerning the various forms of mentality to be
+observed in times of political upheaval, we shall obtain a
+general idea of the character of the men of the Revolution. We
+shall now apply the principles already expounded to the
+most remarkable personages of the revolutionary period.
+
+
+2. Psychology of the Commissaries or Representatives ``on
+Mission.''
+
+
+In Paris the conduct of the members of the Convention was always
+directed, restrained, or excited by the action of their
+colleagues, and that of their environment.
+
+To judge them properly we should observe them when left to
+themselves and uncontrolled, when they possessed full liberty.
+Such were the representatives who were sent ``on mission'' into
+the departments by the Convention.
+
+The power of these delegates was absolute. No censure
+embarrassed them. Functionaries and magistrates had perforce to
+obey them.
+
+A representative ``on mission'' ``requisitions,'' sequestrates,
+or confiscates as seems good to him; taxes, imprisons, deports,
+or decapitates as he thinks fit, and in his own district he is a
+''pasha.''
+
+Regarding themselves as ``pashas,'' they displayed themselves
+``drawn in carriages with six horses, surrounded by guards;
+sitting at sumptuous tables with thirty covers, eating to the
+sound of music, with a following of players, courtezans, and
+mercenaries. . . .'' At Lyons ``the solemn appearance of Collot
+d'Herbois is like that of the Grand Turk. No one can come into
+his presence without three repeated requests; a string of
+apartments precedes his reception-room, and no one approaches
+nearer than fifteen paces.''
+
+One can picture the immense vanity of these dictators as
+they solemnly entered the towns, surrounded by guards, men whose
+gesture was enough to cause heads to fall.
+
+Petty lawyers without clients, doctors without patients,
+unfrocked clergymen, obscure attorneys, who had formerly known
+the most colourless of lives, were suddenly made the equals of
+the most powerful tyrants of history. Guillotining, drowning,
+shooting without mercy, at the hazard of their fancy, they were
+raised from their former humble condition to the level of the
+most celebrated potentates.
+
+Never did Nero or Heliogabalus surpass in tyranny the
+representatives of the Convention. Laws and customs always
+restrained the former to a certain extent. Nothing restrained
+the commissaries.
+
+``Fouche,'' writes Taine, ``lorgnette in hand, watched the
+butchery of 210 inhabitants of Lyons from his window. Collot,
+Laporte, and Fouche feasted on days of execution (fusillades),
+and at the sound of each discharge sprang up with cries of joy,
+waving their hats.''
+
+Among the representatives ``on mission'' who exhibit this
+murderous mentality we may cite as a type the ex-cure Lebon,
+who, having become possessed of supreme power, ravaged Arras and
+Cambrai. His example, with that of Carrier, contributes to show
+what man can become when he escapes from the yoke of law and
+tradition. The cruelty of the ferocious commissary was
+complicated by Sadism; the scaffold was raised under his windows,
+so that he, his wife, and his helpers could rejoice in the
+carnage. At the foot of the guillotine a drinking-booth was
+established where the sans-culottes could come to drink.
+To amuse them the executioner would group on the pavement, in
+ridiculous attitudes, the naked bodies of the decapitated.
+
+``The reading of the two volumes of his trial, printed at Amiens
+in 1795, may be counted as a nightmare. During twenty sessions
+the survivors of the hecatombs of Arras and Cambrai passed
+through the ancient hall of the bailiwick at Amiens, where the
+ex-member of the Convention was tried. What these phantoms in
+mourning related is unheard of. Entire streets dispeopled;
+nonagenarians and girls of sixteen decapitated after a mockery of
+a trial; death buffeted, insulted, adorned, rejoiced in;
+executions to music; battalions of children recruited to guard
+the scaffold; the debauchery, the cynicism, the refinements of an
+insane satrap; a romance by Sade turned epic; it seems, as we
+watch the unpacking of these horrors, that a whole country, long
+terrorised, is at last disgorging its terror and revenging itself
+for its cowardice by overwhelming the wretch there, the scapegoat
+of an abhorred and vanished system.''
+
+The only defence of the ex-clergyman was that he had obeyed
+orders. The facts with which he was reproached had long been
+known, and the Convention had in no wise blamed him for them.
+
+I have already spoken of the vanity of the deputies ``on
+mission,'' who were suddenly endowed with a power greater than
+that of the most powerful despots; but this vanity is not enough
+to explain their ferocity.
+
+That arose from other sources. Apostles of a severe faith, the
+delegates of the Convention, like the inquisitors of the Holy
+Office, could feel, can have felt, no pity for their victims.
+Freed, moreover, from all the bonds of tradition and law,
+they could give rein to the most savage instincts that primitive
+animality has left in us.
+
+Civilisation restrains these instincts, but they never die. The
+need to kill which makes the hunter is a permanent proof of this.
+
+M. Cunisset-Carnot has expressed in the following lines the grip
+of this hereditary tendency, which, in the pursuit of the most
+harmless game, re-awakens the barbarian in every hunter:--
+
+``The pleasure of killing for killing's sake is, one may say,
+universal; it is the basis of the hunting instinct, for it must
+be admitted that at present, in civilised countries, the need to
+live no longer counts for anything in its propagation. In
+reality we are continuing an action which was imperiously imposed
+upon our savage ancestors by the harsh necessities of existence,
+during which they had either to kill or die of hunger, while to-
+day there is no longer any legitimate excuse for it. But so it
+is, and we can do nothing; probably we shall never break the
+chains of a slavery which has bound us for so long. We cannot
+prevent ourselves from feeling an intense, often passionate,
+pleasure in shedding the blood of animals towards whom, when the
+love of the chase possesses us, we lose all feeling of pity. The
+gentlest and prettiest creatures, the song-birds, the charm of
+our springtime, fall to our guns or are choked in our snares, and
+not a shudder of pity troubles our pleasure at seeing them
+terrified, bleeding, writhing in the horrible suffering we
+inflict on them, seeking to flee on their poor broken paws or
+desperately beating their wings, which can no longer support
+them. . . . The excuse is the impulse of that imperious
+atavism which the best of us have not the strength to resist.''
+
+At ordinary times this singular atavism, restrained by fear of
+the laws, can only be exercised on animals. When codes are no
+longer operative it immediately applies itself to man, which is
+why so many terrorists took an intense pleasure in killing.
+Carrier's remark concerning the joy he felt in contemplating the
+faces of his victims during their torment is very typical. In
+many civilised men ferocity is a restrained instinct, but it is
+by no means eliminated.
+
+
+3. Danton and Robespierre.
+
+
+Danton and Robespierre represented the two principal personages
+of the Revolution. I shall say little of the former: his
+psychology, besides being simple, is familiar. A club orator
+firstly, impulsive and violent, he showed himself always ready to
+excite the people. Cruel only in his speeches, he often
+regretted their effects. From the outset he shone in the first
+rank, while his future rival, Robespierre, was vegetating almost
+in the lowest.
+
+At one given moment Danton became the soul of the Revolution, but
+he was deficient in tenacity and fixity of conduct. Moreover, he
+was needy, while Robespierre was not. The continuous fanaticism
+of the latter defeated the intermittent efforts of the former.
+Nevertheless, it was an amazing spectacle to see so powerful a
+tribune sent to the scaffold by his pale, venemous enemy and
+mediocre rival.
+
+Robespierre, the most influential man of the Revolution and the
+most frequently studied, is yet the least explicable. It is
+difficult to understand the prodigious influence which
+gave him the power of life and death, not only over the enemies
+of the Revolution but also over colleagues who could not have
+been considered as enemies of the existing Government.
+
+We certainly cannot explain the matter by saying with Taine that
+Robespierre was a pedant lost in abstractions, nor by asserting
+with the Michelet that he succeeded on account of his principles,
+nor by repeating with his contemporary Williams that ``one of the
+secrets of his government was to take men marked by opprobrium or
+soiled with crime as stepping-stones to his ambition.''
+
+It is impossible to regard his eloquence as the cause of his
+success. His eyes protected by goggles, he painfully read his
+speeches, which were composed of cold and indefinite
+abstractions. The Assembly contained orators who possessed an
+immensely superior talent, such as Danton and the Girondists; yet
+it was Robespierre who destroyed them.
+
+We have really no acceptable explanation of the ascendancy which
+the dictator finally obtained. Without influence in the National
+Assembly, he gradually became the master of the Convention and of
+the Jacobins. ``When he reached the Committee of Public Safety
+he was already,'' said Billaud-Varennes, ``the most important
+person in France.''
+
+``His history,'' writes Michelet, ``is prodigious, far more
+marvellous than that of Bonaparte. The threads, the wheels, the
+preparation of forces, are far less visible. It is an honest
+man, an austere but pious figure, of middling talents, that
+shoots up one morning, borne upward by I know not what cataclysm.
+There is nothing like it in the Arabian Nights. And in a moment
+he goes higher than the throne. He is set upon the altar.
+Astonishing story!''
+
+Certainly circumstances helped him considerably. People turned
+to him as to the master of whom all felt the need. But then he
+was already there, and what we wish to discover is the cause of
+his rapid ascent. I would willingly suppose in him the existence
+of a species of personal fascination which escapes us to-day.
+His successes with women might be quoted in support of this
+theory. On the days when he speaks ``the passages are choked
+with women . . . there are seven or eight hundred in the
+tribunes, and with what transports they applaud! At the
+Jacobins, when he speaks there are sobs and cries of emotion, and
+men stamp as though they would bring the hall down.'' A young
+widow, Mme. de Chalabre, possessed of sixteen hundred pounds a
+year, sends him burning love-letters and is eager to marry him.
+
+We cannot seek in his character for the causes of his popularity.
+A hypochondriac by temperament, of mediocre intelligence,
+incapable of grasping realities, confined to abstractions, crafty
+and dissimulating, his prevailing note was an excessive pride
+which increased until his last day. High priest of a new faith,
+he believed himself sent on earth by God to establish the
+reign of virtue. He received writings stating ``that he
+was the Messiah whom the Eternal Being had promised to reform
+the world.''
+
+Full of literary pretensions, he laboriously polished his
+speeches. His profound jealousy of other orators or men of
+letters, such as Camille Desmoulins, caused their death.
+
+``Those who were particularly the objects of the tyrant's rage,''
+writes the author already cited, ``were the men of letters. With
+regard to them the jealousy of a colleague was mingled with the
+fury of the oppressor; for the hatred with which he persecuted
+them was caused less by their resistance to his despotism than by
+their talents, which eclipsed his.''
+
+The contempt of the dictator for his colleagues was immense and
+almost unconcealed. Giving audience to Barras at the hour of his
+toilet, he finished shaving, spitting in the direction of his
+colleague as though he did not exist, and disdaining to reply to
+his questions.
+
+He regarded the bourgeoisie and the deputies with the same
+hateful disdain. Only the multitude found grace in his eyes.
+``When the sovereign people exercises its power,'' he said, ``we
+can only bow before it. In all it does all is virtue and truth,
+and no excess, error, or crime is possible.''
+
+Robespierre suffered from the persecution mania. That he had
+others' heads cut off was not only because he had a mission as an
+apostle, but because he believed himself hemmed in by enemies and
+conspirators. ``Great as was the cowardice of his colleagues
+where he was concerned,'' writes M. Sorel, ``the fear he had of
+them was still greater.''
+
+His dictatorship, absolute during five months, is a striking
+example of the power of certain leaders. We can understand that
+a tyrant backed by an army can easily destroy whom he pleases,
+but that a single man should succeed in sending to death a large
+number of his equals is a thing that is not easily explained.
+
+The power of Robespierre was so absolute that he was able to send
+to the Tribunal, and therefore to the scaffold, the most eminent
+deputies: Desmoulins, Hebert, Danton, and many another. The
+brilliant Girondists melted away before him. He attacked even
+the terrible Commune, guillotined its leaders, and replaced it by
+a new Commune obedient to his orders.
+
+In order to rid himself more quickly of the men who displeased
+him he induced the Convention to enact the law of Prairial, which
+permitted the execution of mere suspects, and by means of which
+he had 1,373 heads cut off in Paris in forty-nine days. His
+colleagues, the victims of an insane terror, no longer slept at
+home; scarcely a hundred deputies were present at sessions.
+David said: ``I do not believe twenty of us members of the
+Mountain will be left.''
+
+It was his very excess of confidence in his own powers and in the
+cowardice of the Convention that lost Robespierre his life.
+Having attempted to make them vote a measure which would permit
+deputies to be sent before the Revolutionary Tribunal, which
+meant the scaffold, without the authorisation of the Assembly, on
+an order from the governing Committee, several Montagnards
+conspired with some members of the Plain to overthrow him.
+Tallien, knowing himself marked down for early execution, and
+having therefore nothing to lose, accused him loudly of tyranny.
+Robespierre wished to defend himself by reading a speech which he
+had long had in hand, but he learned to his cost that although it
+is possible to destroy men in the name of logic it is not
+possible to lead an assembly by means of logic. The
+shouts of the conspirators drowned his voice; the cry ``Down with
+the tyrant!'' quickly repeated, thanks to mental contagion, by
+many of the members present, was enough to complete his downfall.
+Without losing a moment the Assembly decreed his accusation.
+
+The Commune having wished to save him, the Assembly outlawed him.
+Struck by this magic formula, he was definitely lost.
+
+``This cry of outlawry,'' writes Williams, ``at this period
+produced the same effect on a Frenchman as the cry of pestilence;
+the outlaw became civilly excommunicated, and it was as though
+men believed that they would be contaminated passing through the
+air which he had breathed. Such was the effect it produced upon
+the gunners who had trained their cannon against the Convention.
+Without receiving further orders, merely on hearing that the
+Commune was `outside the law,' they immediately turned their
+batteries about.''
+
+Robespierre and all his band--Saint-Just, the president of the
+Revolutionary Tribunal, the mayor of the Commune, &c.,--were
+guillotined on the 10th of Thermidor to the number of twenty-one.
+
+Their execution was followed on the morrow by a fresh batch of
+seventy Jacobins, and on the next day by thirteen. The Terror,
+which had lasted ten months, was at an end.
+
+The downfall of the Jacobin edifice in Thermidor is one of the
+most curious psychological events of the revolutionary period.
+None of the Montagnards who had worked for the downfall of
+Robespierre had for a moment dreamed that it would mark the end
+of the Terror.
+
+Tallien, Barras, Fouche, &c., overthrew Robespierre as he had
+overthrown Hebert, Danton, the Girondists, and many others.
+But when the acclamations of the crowd told them that the death
+of Robespierre was regarded as having put an end to the Terror
+they acted as though such had been their intention. They were
+the more obliged to do so in that the Plain--that is, the great
+majority of the Assembly--which had allowed itself to be
+decimated by Robespierre, now rebelled furiously against the
+system it had so long acclaimed even while it abhorred it.
+Nothing is more terrible than a body of men who have been afraid
+and are afraid no longer. The Plain revenged itself for being
+terrorised by the Mountain, and terrorised that body in turn.
+
+The servility of the colleagues of Robespierre in the Convention
+was by no means based upon any feeling of sympathy for him. The
+dictator filled them with an unspeakable alarm, but beneath the
+marks of admiration and enthusiasm which they lavished on him out
+of fear was concealed an intense hatred. We can gather as much
+by reading the reports of various deputies inserted in the
+Moniteur of August 11, 15, and 29, 1794, and notably that on
+``the conspiracy of the triumvirs, Robespierre, Couthon, and
+Saint-Just.'' Never did slaves heap such invectives on a fallen
+master.
+
+We learn that ``these monsters had for some time been renewing
+the most horrible prescriptions of Marius and Sulla.''
+Robespierre is represented as a most frightful scoundrel; we are
+assured that ``like Caligula, he would soon have asked the French
+people to worship his horse . . . He sought security in
+the execution of all who aroused his slightest suspicion.''
+
+These reports forget to add that the power of Robespierre
+obtained no support, as did that of the Marius and Sulla to whom
+they allude, from a powerful army, but merely from the repeated
+adhesion of the members of the Convention. Without their
+extreme timidity the power of the dictator could not have lasted
+a single day.
+
+Robespierre was one of the most odious tyrants of history, but he
+is distinguished from all others in that he made himself a tyrant
+without soldiers.
+
+We may sum up his doctrines by saying that he was the most
+perfect incarnation, save perhaps Saint-Just, of the Jacobin
+faith, in all its narrow logic, its intense mysticism, and its
+inflexible rigidity. He has admirers even to-day. M. Hamel
+describes him as ``the martyr of Thermidor.'' There has been
+some talk of erecting a monument to him. I would willingly
+subscribe to such a purpose, feeling that it is useful to
+preserve proofs of the blindness of the crowd, and of the
+extraordinary docility of which an assembly is capable when the
+leader knows how to handle it. His statue would recall the
+passionate cries of admiration and enthusiasm with which the
+Convention acclaimed the most threatening measures of the
+dictator, on the very eve of the day when it was about to cast
+him down.
+
+
+4. Fouquier-Tinville, Marat, Billaud-Varenne, &c.
+
+
+I shall devote a paragraph to certain revolutionists who were
+famous for the development of their most sanguinary instincts.
+Their ferocity was complicated by other sentiments, by
+fear and hatred, which could but fortify it.
+
+Fouquier-Tinville, the public prosecutor of the Revolutionary
+Tribunal, was one of those who have left the most sinister
+memories. This magistrate, formerly reputed for his kindness,
+and who became the bloodthirsty creature whose memory evokes such
+repulsion, has already served me as an example in other works,
+when I have wished to show the transformation of certain natures
+in time of revolution.
+
+Needy in the extreme at the moment of the fall of the monarchy,
+he had everything to hope from a social upheaval and nothing to
+lose. He was one of those men whom a period of disorder will
+always find ready to sustain it.
+
+The Convention abandoned its powers to him. He had to pronounce
+upon the fate of nearly two thousand accused, among whom were
+Marie-Antoinette, the Girondists, Danton, Hebert, &c. He had
+all the suspects brought before him executed, and did not scruple
+to betray his former protectors. As soon as one of them fell
+into his power--Camille Desmoulins, Danton, or another--he would
+plead against him.
+
+Fouquier-Tinville had a very inferior mind, which the Revolution
+brought to the top. Under normal conditions, hedged about by
+professional rules, his destiny would have been that of a
+peaceable and obscure magistrate. This was precisely the lot of
+his deputy, or substitute, at the Tribunal, Gilbert-Liendon.
+``He should,'' writes M. Durel, ``have inspired the same horror
+as his colleague, yet he completed his career in the upper ranks
+of the Imperial magistracy.''
+
+One of the great benefits of an organised society is that it does
+restrain these dangerous characters, whom nothing but social
+restraints can hold.
+
+Fouquier-Tinville died without understanding why he was
+condemned, and from the revolutionary point of view his
+condemnation was not justifiable. Had he not merely zealously
+executed the orders of his superiors? It is impossible to class
+him with the representatives who were sent into the provinces,
+who could not be supervised. The delegates of the Convention
+examined all his sentences and approved of them up to the last.
+If his cruelty and his summary fashion of trying the prisoners
+before him had not been encouraged by his chiefs, he could not
+have remained in power. In condemning Fouquier-Tinville, the
+Convention condemned its own frightful system of government. It
+understood this fact, and sent to the scaffold a number of
+Terrorists whom Fouquier-Tinville had merely served as a faithful
+agent.
+
+Beside Fouquier-Tinville we may set Dumas, who presided over the
+Revolutionary Tribunal, and who also displayed an excessive
+cruelty, which was whetted by an intense fear. He never went out
+without two loaded pistols, barricaded himself in his house, and
+only spoke to visitors through a wicket. His distrust of
+everybody, including his own wife, was absolute. He even
+imprisoned the latter, and was about to have her executed when
+Thermidor arrived.
+
+Among the men whom the Convention brought to light, Billaud-
+Varenne was one of the wildest and, most brutal. He may be
+regarded as a perfect type of bestial ferocity.
+
+``In these hours of fruitful anger and heroic anguish he
+remained calm, acquitting himself methodically of his task--and
+it was a frightful task: he appeared officially at the massacres
+of the Abbaye, congratulated the assassins, and promised them
+money; upon which he went home as if he had merely been taking a
+walk. We see him as president of the Jacobin Club, president of
+the Convention, and member of the Committee of Public Safety; he
+drags the Girondists to the scaffold: he drags the queen thither,
+and his former patron, Danton, said of him, `Billaud has a dagger
+under his tongue.' He approves of the cannonades at Lyons, the
+drownings at Nantes, the massacres at Arras; he organises the
+pitiless commission of Orange; he is concerned in the laws of
+Prairial; he eggs on Fouquier-Tinville; on all decrees of death
+is his name, often the first; he signs before his colleagues; he
+is without pity, without emotion, without enthusiasm; when others
+are frightened, hesitate, and draw back, he goes his way,
+speaking in turgid sentences, `shaking his lion's mane'--for to
+make his cold and impassive face more in harmony with the
+exuberance that surrounds him he now decks himself in a yellow
+wig which would make one laugh were it on any but the sinister
+head of Billaud-Varenne. When Robespierre, Saint-Just, and
+Couthon are threatened in turn, he deserts them and goes over to
+the enemy, and pushes them under the knife. . . . Why? What is
+his aim? No one knows; he is not in any way ambitious; he
+desires neither power nor money.''
+
+I do not think it would be difficult to answer why. The thirst
+for blood, of which we have already spoken, and which is very
+common among certain criminals, perfectly explains the
+conduct of Billaud-Varennes. Bandits of this type kill for the
+sake of killing, as sportsmen shoot game--for the very pleasure
+of exercising their taste for destruction. In ordinary times men
+endowed with these homicidal tendencies refrain, generally from
+fear of the policeman and the scaffold. When they are able to
+give them free vent nothing can stop them. Such was the case
+with Billaud-Varenne and many others.
+
+The psychology of Marat is rather more complicated, not only
+because his craving for murder was combined with other elements--
+wounded self-love, ambition, mystic beliefs, &c.--but also
+because we must regard him as a semi-lunatic, affected by
+megalomania, and haunted by fixed ideas.
+
+Before the Revolution he had advanced great scientific
+pretensions, but no one attached much importance to his
+maunderings. Dreaming of place and honour, he had only obtained
+a very subordinate situation in the household of a great noble.
+The Revolution opened up an unhoped-for future. Swollen with
+hatred of the old social system which had not recognised his
+merits, he put himself at the head of the most violent section of
+the people. Having publicly glorified the massacres of
+September, he founded a journal which denounced everybody and
+clamoured incessantly for executions.
+
+Speaking continually of the interests of the people, Marat became
+their idol. The majority of his colleagues heartily despised
+him. Had he escaped the knife of Charlotte Corday, he certainly
+would not have escaped that of the guillotine.
+
+
+5. The Destiny of those Members of the Convention who survived
+the Revolution.
+
+
+Beside the members of the Convention whose psychology presents
+particular characteristics there were others--Barras, Fouche,
+Tallien, Merlin de Thionville, &c.--completely devoid of
+principles or belief, who only sought to enrich themselves.
+
+They sought to build up enormous fortunes out of the public
+misery. In ordinary times they would have been qualified as
+simple scoundrels, but in periods of revolution all standards
+of vice and virtue seem to disappear.
+
+Although a few Jacobins remained fanatics, the majority renounced
+their convictions as soon as they had obtained riches, and became
+the faithful courtiers of Napoleon. Cambaceres, who, on
+addressing Louis XVI. in prison, called him Louis Capet, under
+the Empire required his friends to call him ``Highness'' in
+public and ``Monseigneur'' in private, thus displaying the
+envious feeling which accompanied the craving for equality in
+many of the Jacobins.
+
+``The majority of the Jacobins,'' writes M. Madelin ``were
+greatly enriched, and like Chabot, Bazire, Merlin, Barras,
+Boursault, Tallien, Barrere, &c., possessed chateaux and
+estates. Those who were not wealthy as yet were soon to become
+so. . . In the Committee of the year III. alone the staff of the
+Thermidorian party comprised a future prince, 13 future counts, 5
+future barons, 7 future senators of the Empire, and 6 future
+Councillors of State, and beside them in the Convention there
+were, between the future Duke of Otranto to the future Count
+Regnault, no less than 50 democrats who fifteen years
+later possessed titles, coats of arms, plumes, carriages,
+endowments, entailed estates, hotels, and chateaux.
+Fouche died worth L600,000.''
+
+The privileges of the ancien regime which had been so
+bitterly decried were thus very soon re-established for the
+benefit of the bourgeoisie. To arrive at this result it was
+necessary to ruin France, to burn entire provinces, to multiply
+suffering, to plunge innumerable families into despair, to
+overturn Europe, and to destroy men by the hundred thousand on
+the field of battle.
+
+In closing this chapter we will recall what we have already said
+concerning the possibility of judging the men of this period.
+
+Although the moralist is forced to deal severely with certain
+individuals, because he judges them by the types which society
+must respect if it is to succeed in maintaining itself, the
+psychologist is not in the same case. His aim is to understand,
+and criticism vanishes before a complete comprehension.
+
+The human mind is a very fragile mechanism, and the marionettes
+which dance upon the stage of history are rarely able to resist
+the imperious forces which impel them. Heredity, environment,
+and circumstances are imperious masters. No one can say with
+certainty what would have been his conduct in the place of the
+men whose actions he endeavours to interpret.
+
+
+
+BOOK III
+
+THE CONFLICT BETWEEN ANCESTRAL INFLUENCES AND REVOLUTIONARY
+PRINCIPLES
+
+CHAPTER I
+
+THE LAST CONVULSIONS OF ANARCHY--THE DIRECTORY
+
+1. The Psychology of the Directory.
+
+As the various revolutionary assemblies were composed in part of
+the same men, one might suppose that their psychology would be
+very similar.
+
+At ordinary periods this would have been so, for a constant
+environment means constancy of character. But when circumstances
+change as rapidly as they did under the Revolution, character
+must perforce transform itself to adapt itself thereto. Such was
+the case with the Directory.
+
+The Directory comprised several distinct assemblies: two large
+chambers, consisting of different categories of deputies, and one
+very small chamber, which consisted of the five Directors.
+
+The two larger Assemblies remind one strongly of the Convention
+by their weakness. They were no longer forced to obey popular
+riots, as these were energetically prevented by the Directors,
+but they yielded without discussion to the dictatorial
+injunctions of the latter.
+
+The first deputies to be elected were mostly moderates. Everyone
+was weary of the Jacobin tyranny. The new Assembly dreamed of
+rebuilding the ruins with which France was covered, and
+establishing a liberal government without violence.
+
+But by one of those fatalities which were a law of the
+Revolution, and which prove that the course of events is often
+superior to men's wills, these deputies, like their predecessors,
+may be said always to have done the contrary of what they wished
+to do. They hoped to be moderate, and they were violent; they
+wanted to eliminate the influence of the Jacobins, and they
+allowed themselves to be led by them; they thought to repair the
+ruins of the country and they succeeded only in adding others to
+them; they aspired to religious peace, and they finally
+persecuted and massacred the priests with greater rigour than
+during the Terror.
+
+The psychology of the little assembly formed by the five
+Directors was very different from that of the Chamber of
+Deputies. Encountering fresh difficulties daily, the directors
+were forced to resolve them, while the large Assemblies, without
+contact with realities, had only their aspirations.
+
+The prevailing thought of the Directors was very simple. Highly
+indifferent to principles, they wished above all to remain the
+masters of France. To attain that result they did not shrink
+from resorting to the most illegitimate measures, even annulling
+the elections of a great number of the departments when these
+embarrassed them.
+
+Feeling themselves incapable of reorganising France, they left
+her to herself. By their despotism they contrived to dominate
+her, but they never governed her. Now, what France needed more
+than anything at this juncture was to be governed.
+
+The convention has left behind it the reputation of a strong
+Government, and the Directory that of a weak Government. The
+contrary is true: it was the Directory that was the strong
+Government.
+
+Psychologically we may readily explain the difference between the
+Government of the Directory and that of the preceding Assemblies
+by recalling the fact that a gathering of six hundred to seven
+hundred persons may well suffer from waves of contagious
+enthusiasm, as on the night of the 4th of August, or even
+impulses of energetic will-power, such as that which launched
+defiance against the kings of Europe. But such impulses are too
+ephemeral to possess any great force. A committee of five
+members, easily dominated by the will of one, is far more
+susceptible of continuous resolution--that is, of perseverance in
+a settled line of conduct.
+
+The Government of the Directory proved to be always incapable of
+governing, but it never lacked a strong will. Nothing
+restraining it, neither respect for law nor consideration for the
+citizens, nor love of the public welfare, it was able to impose
+upon France a despotism more crushing than that of any Government
+since the beginning of the Revolution, not excepting the Terror.
+
+Although it utilised methods analogous to those of the
+Convention, and ruled France in the most tyrannical manner, the
+Directory, no more than the Convention, was never the master of
+France.
+
+This fact, which I have already noted, proves once more the
+impotence of material constraint to dominate moral forces. It
+cannot be too often repeated that the true guide of mankind is
+the moral scaffolding erected by his ancestors.
+
+Accustomed to live in an organised society, supported by codes
+and respected traditions, we can with difficulty represent to
+ourselves the condition of a nation deprived of such a basis. As
+a general thing we only see the irksome side of our environment,
+too readily forgetting that society can exist only on condition
+of imposing certain restraints, and that laws, manners, and
+custom constitute a check upon the natural instincts of barbarism
+which never entirely perishes.
+
+The history of the Convention and the Directory which followed it
+shows plainly to what degree disorder may overcome a nation
+deprived of its ancient structure, and having for guide only the
+artificial combinations of an insufficient reason.
+
+
+2. Despotic Government of the Directory. Recrudescence of the
+Terror.
+
+
+With the object of diverting attention, occupying the army, and
+obtaining resources by the pillage of neighbouring countries, the
+Directors decided to resume the wars of conquest which had
+succeeded under the Convention.
+
+These continued during the life time of the Directory. The
+armies won a rich booty, especially in Italy.
+
+Some of the invaded populations were so simple as to suppose that
+these invasions were undertaken in their interest. They were not
+long in discovering that all military operations were
+accompanied by crushing taxes and the pillage of churches, public
+treasuries, &c.
+
+The final consequence of this policy of conquest was the
+formation of a new coalition against France, which lasted until
+1801.
+
+Indifferent to the state of the country and incapable of
+reorganising it, the Directors were principally concerned in
+struggling against an incessant series of conspiracies in order
+to keep in power.
+
+This task was enough to occupy their leisure, for the political
+parties had not disarmed. Anarchy had reached such a point that
+all were calling for a hand powerful enough to restore order.
+Everyone felt, the Directors included, that the republican system
+could not last much longer.
+
+Some dreamed of re-establishing royalty, others the Terrorist
+system, while others waited for a general. Only the purchasers
+of the national property feared a change of Government.
+
+The unpopularity of the Directory increased daily, and when in
+May, 1797, the third part of the Assembly had to be renewed, the
+majority of those elected were hostile to the system.
+
+The Directors were not embarrassed by a little thing like that.
+They annulled the elections in 49 departments; 154 of the new
+deputies were invalidated and expelled, 53 condemned to
+deportation. Among these latter figured the most illustrious
+names of the Revolution: Portalis, Carnot, Tronson du Coudray,
+&c.
+
+To intimidate the electors, military commissions condemned to
+death, rather at random, 160 persons, and sent to Guiana 330, of
+whom half speedily died. The emigres and priests who
+had returned to France were violently expelled. This was known
+as the coup d'etat of Fructidor.
+
+This coup, which struck more especially at the moderates, was
+not the only one of its kind; another quickly followed. The
+Directors, finding the Jacobin deputies too numerous, annulled
+the elections of sixty of them.
+
+The preceding facts displayed the tyrannical temper of the
+Directors, but this appeared even more plainly in the details of
+their measures. The new masters of France also proved to be as
+bloodthirsty as the most ferocious deputies of the Terror.
+
+The guillotine was not re-established as a permanency, but
+replaced by deportation under conditions which left the victims
+little chance of survival. Sent to Rochefort in cages of iron
+bars, exposed to all the severities of the weather, they were
+then packed into boats.
+
+``Between the decks of the Decade and the Bayonnaise,''
+says Taine, ``the miserable prisoners, suffocated by the lack of
+air and the torrid heat, bullied and fleeced, died of hunger or
+asphyxia, and Guiana completed the work of the voyage: of 193
+taken thither by the Decade 39 were left alive at the end of
+twenty-two months; of 120 taken by the Bayonnaise 1 remained.
+
+Observing everywhere a Catholic renascence, and imagining that
+the clergy were conspiring against them, the Directors deported
+or sent to the galleys in one year 1,448 priests, to say nothing
+of a large number who were summarily executed. The Terror was in
+reality completely re-established.
+
+The autocratic despotism of the Directory was exercised in all
+the branches of the administration, notably the finances. Thus,
+having need of six hundred million francs, it forced the
+deputies, always docile, to vote a progressive impost, which
+yielded, however, only twelve millions. Being presently in the
+same condition, it decreed a forced loan of a hundred millions,
+which resulted in the closing of workshops, the stoppage of
+business, and the dismissal of domestics. It was only at the
+price of absolute ruin that forty millions could be obtained.
+
+To assure itself of domination in the provinces the Directory
+caused a so-called law of hostages to be passed, according to
+which a list of hostages, responsible for all offences, was drawn
+up in each commune.
+
+It is easy to understand what hatred such a system provoked. At
+the end of 1799 fourteen departments were in revolt and forty-six
+were ready to rise. If the Directory had lasted the dissolution
+of society would have been complete.
+
+For that matter, this dissolution was far advanced. Finances,
+administration, everything was crumbling. The receipts of the
+Treasury, consisting of depreciated assignats fallen to a
+hundredth part of their original value, were negligible. Holders
+of Government stock and officers could no longer obtain payment.
+
+France at this time gave travellers the impression of a country
+ravaged by war and abandoned by its inhabitants. The broken
+bridges and dykes and ruined buildings made all traffic
+impossible. The roads, long deserted, were infested by brigands.
+
+Certain departments could only be crossed at the price of buying
+a safe-conduct from the leaders of these bands. Industry
+and commerce were annihilated. In Lyons 13,000 workshops and
+mills out of 15,000 had been forced to close. Lille, Havre,
+Bordeaux, Lyons, Marseilles, &c., were like dead cities. Poverty
+and famine were general.
+
+The moral disorganisation was no less terrible. Luxury and the
+craving for pleasure, costly dinners, jewels, and extravagant
+households were the appanage of a new society composed entirely
+of stock-jobbers, army contractors, and shady financiers enriched
+by pillage. They gave Paris that superficial aspect of luxury
+and gaiety which has deluded so many historians of this period,
+because the insolent prodigality displayed covered the general
+misery.
+
+The chronicles of the Directory as told in books help to show us
+of what lies the web of history is woven. The theatre has lately
+got hold of this period, of which the fashions are still
+imitated. It has left the memory of a joyous period of re-birth
+after the gloomy drama of the Terror. In reality the drama of
+the Directory was hardly an improvement on the Terror and was
+quite as sanguinary. Finally, it inspired such loathing that the
+Directors, feeling that it could not last, sought themselves for
+the dictator capable of replacing it and also of protecting them.
+
+
+3. The Advent of Bonaparte.
+
+
+We have seen that at the end of the Directory the anarchy and
+disorganisation were such that every one was desperately calling
+for the man of energy capable of re-establishing order. As early
+as 1795 a number of deputies had thought for a moment of re-
+establishing royalty. Louis XVIII., having been tactless
+enough to declare that he would restore the ancien regime in
+its entirety, return all property to its original owners, and
+punish the men of the Revolution, was immediately thrown over.
+The senseless expedition of Quiberon finally alienated the
+supporters of the future sovereign. The royalists gave a proof
+during the whole of the Revolution of an incapacity and a
+narrowness of mind which justified most of the measures taken
+against them.
+
+The monarchy being impossible, it was necessary to find a
+general. Only one existed whose name carried weight--Bonaparte.
+The campaign in Italy had just made him famous. Having crossed
+the Alps, he had marched from victory to victory, penetrated to
+Milan and Venice, and everywhere obtained important war
+contributions. He then made towards Vienna, and was only twenty-
+five leagues from its gates when the Emperor of Austria decided
+to sue for peace.
+
+But great as was his renown, the young general did not consider
+it sufficient. To increase it he persuaded the Directory that
+the power of England could be shaken by an invasion of Egypt, and
+in May, 1798, he embarked at Toulon.
+
+This need of increasing his prestige arose from a very sound
+psychological conception which he clearly expounded at St.
+Helena:--
+
+``The most influential and enlightened generals had long been
+pressing the general of Italy to take steps to place himself at
+the head of the Republic. He refused; he was not yet strong
+enough to walk quite alone. He had ideas upon the art of
+governing and upon what was necessary to a great nation
+which were so different from those of the men of the
+Revolution and the assemblies that, not being able to act alone,
+he feared to compromise his character. He determined to set out
+for Egypt, but resolved to reappear if circumstances should arise
+to render his presence useful or necessary.''
+
+Bonaparte did not stay long in Egypt. Recalled by his friends,
+he landed at Frejus, and the announcement of his return provoked
+universal enthusiasm. There were illuminations everywhere.
+France collaborated in advance in the coup d'etat prepared
+by two Directors and the principal ministers. The plot was
+organised in three weeks. Its execution on the 18th of Brumaire
+was accomplished with the greatest ease.
+
+All parties experienced the greatest delight at being rid of the
+sinister gangs who had so long oppressed and exploited the
+country. The French were doubtless about to enter upon a
+despotic system of government, but it could not be so intolerable
+as that which had been endured for so many years.
+
+The history of the coup d'etat of Brumaire justifies all
+that we have already said of the impossibility of forming exact
+judgments of events which apparently are fully understood and
+attested by no matter how many witnesses.
+
+We know what ideas people had thirty years ago concerning the
+coup of Brumaire. It was regarded as a crime committed by the
+ambition of a man who was supported by his army. As a matter of
+fact the army played no part whatever in the affair. The little
+body of men who expelled the few recalcitrant deputies were not
+soldiers even, but the gendarmes of the Assembly itself. The
+true author of the coup d'etat was the Government itself, with
+the complicity of all France.
+
+
+4. Causes of the Duration of the Revolution.
+
+
+If we limit the Revolution to the time necessary for the conquest
+of its fundamental principles--equality before the law, free
+access to public functions, popular sovereignty, control of
+expenditures, &c.--we may say that it lasted only a few months.
+Towards the middle of 1789 all this was accomplished, and during
+the years that followed nothing was added to it, yet the
+Revolution lasted much longer.
+
+Confining the duration to the dates admitted by the official
+historians, we see it persisting until the advent of Bonaparte, a
+space of some ten years.
+
+Why did this period of disorganisation and violence follow the
+establishment of the new principles? We need not seek the cause
+in the foreign war, which might on several occasions have been
+terminated, thanks to the divisions of the allies and the
+constant victories of the French; neither must we look for it in
+the sympathy of Frenchmen for the revolutionary Government.
+Never was rule more cordially hated and despised than that of the
+Assemblies. By its revolts as well as by its repeated votes a
+great part of the nation displayed the horror with which it
+regarded the system.
+
+This last point, the aversion of France for the revolutionary
+regime, so long misunderstood, has been well displayed by
+recent historians. The author of the last book published on the
+Revolution, M. Madelin, has well summarised their opinion in the
+following words:--
+
+``As early as 1793 a party by no means numerous had seized upon
+France, the Revolution, and the Republic. Now, three-quarters of
+France longed for the Revolution to be checked, or rather
+delivered from its odious exploiters; but these held the unhappy
+country by a thousand means. . . . As the Terror was essential
+to them if they were to rule, they struck at whomsoever seemed at
+any given moment to be opposed to the Terror, were they the best
+servants of the Revolution.''
+
+Up to the end of the Directory the government was exercised by
+Jacobins, who merely desired to retain, along with the supreme
+power, the riches they had accumulated by murder and pillage, and
+were ready to surrender France to any one who would guarantee
+them free possession of these. That they negotiated the coup
+d'etat of Brumaire with Napoleon was simply to the fact that
+they had not been able to realise their wishes with regard to
+Louis XVIII.
+
+But how explain the fact that a Government so tyrannical and so
+dishonoured was able to survive for so many years?
+
+It was not merely because the revolutionary religion still
+survived in men's minds, nor because it was forced on them by
+means of persecution and bloodshed, but especially, as I have
+already stated, on account of the great interest which a large
+portion of the population had in maintaining it.
+
+This point is fundamental. If the Revolution had remained a
+theoretical religion, it would probably have been of short
+duration. But the belief which had just been founded very
+quickly emerged from the domain of pure theory.
+
+The Revolution did not confine itself to despoiling the monarchy,
+the nobility, and the clergy of their powers of government. In
+throwing into the hands of the bourgeoisie and the large
+numbers of peasantry the wealth and the employments of the old
+privileged classes it had at the same stroke turned them into
+obstinate supporters of the revolutionary system. All those who
+had acquired the property of which the nobles and clergy had been
+despoiled had obtained lands and chateaux at low prices, and
+were terrified lest the restoration of the monarchy should force
+them to make general restitution.
+
+It was largely for these reasons that a Government which, at any
+normal period, would never have been endured, was able to survive
+until a master should re-establish order, while promising to
+maintain not only the moral but also the material conquests of
+the Revolution. Bonaparte realised these anxieties, and was
+promptly and enthusiastically welcomed. Material conquests which
+were still contestable and theoretical principles which were
+still fragile were by him incorporated in institutions and the
+laws. It is an error to say that the Revolution terminated with
+his advent. Far from destroying it, he ratified and consolidated
+it.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER II
+
+THE RESTORATION OF ORDER. THE CONSULAR REPUBLIC
+
+1. How the Work of the Revolution was Confirmed by the
+Consulate.
+
+The history of the Consulate is as rich as the preceding period
+in psychological material. In the first place it shows us that
+the work of a powerful individual is superior to that of a
+collectivity. Bonaparte immediately replaced the bloody anarchy
+in which the Republic had for ten years been writhing by a period
+of order. That which none of the four Assemblies of the
+Revolution had been able to realise, despite the most violent
+oppression, a single man accomplished in a very short space of
+time.
+
+His authority immediately put an end to all the Parisian
+insurrections and the attempts at monarchical resistance, and re-
+established the moral unity of France, so profoundly divided by
+intense hatreds. Bonaparte replaced an unorganised collective
+despotism by a perfectly organised individual despotism.
+Everyone gained thereby, for his tyranny was infinitely less
+heavy than that which had been endured for ten long years. We
+must suppose, moreover, that it was unwelcome to very few, as it
+was very soon accepted with immense enthusiasm.
+
+We know better to-day than to repeat with the old historians that
+Bonaparte overthrew the Republic. On the contrary, he retained
+of it all that could be retained, and never would have been
+retained without him, by establishing all the practicable work of
+the Revolution--the abolition of privileges, equality before the
+law, &c.--in institutions and codes of law. The Consular
+Government continued, moreover, to call itself the Republic.
+
+It is infinitely probable that without the Consulate a
+monarchical restoration would have terminated the Directory, and
+would have wiped out the greater part of the work of the
+Revolution. Let us suppose Bonaparte erased from history. No
+one, I think, will imagine that the Directory could have survived
+the universal weariness of its rule. It would certainly have
+been overturned by the royalist conspiracies which were breaking
+out daily, and Louis XVIII. would probably have ascended the
+throne. Certainly he was to mount it sixteen years later, but
+during this interval Bonaparte gave such force to the principles
+of the Revolution, by establishing them in laws and customs, that
+the restored sovereign dared not touch them, nor restore the
+property of the returned emigres.
+
+Matters would have been very different had Louis XVIII.
+immediately followed the Directory. He would have brought with
+him all the absolutism of the ancien regime, and fresh
+revolutions would have been necessary to abolish it. We know
+that a mere attempt to return to the past overthrew Charles X.
+
+It would be a little ingenuous to complain of the tyranny
+of Bonaparte. Under the ancien regime Frenchmen had
+supported every species of tyranny, and the Republic had created
+a despotism even heavier than that of the monarchy. Despotism
+was then a normal condition, which aroused no protest save when
+it was accompanied by disorder.
+
+A constant law of the psychology of crowds shows them as creating
+anarchy, and then seeking the master who will enable them to
+emerge therefrom. Bonaparte was this master.
+
+
+2. The Reorganisation of France by the Consulate.
+
+
+Upon assuming power Bonaparte undertook a colossal task. All was
+in ruins; all was to be rebuilt. On the morrow of the coup of
+Brumaire he drafted, almost single-handed, the Constitution
+destined to give him the absolute power which was to enable him
+to reorganise the country and to prevail over the factions. In a
+month it was completed.
+
+This Constitution, known as that of the year VIII., survived,
+with slight modifications, until the end of his reign. The
+executive power was the attribute of three Consuls, two of whom
+possessed a consultative voice only. The first Consul,
+Bonaparte, was therefore sole master of France. He appointed
+ministers, councillors of state, ambassadors, magistrates, and
+other officials, and decided upon peace or war. The legislative
+power was his also, since only he could initiate the laws, which
+were subsequently submitted to three Assemblies--the Council of
+State, the Tribunate, and the Legislative Corps. A fourth
+Assembly, the Senate, acted effectually as the guardian of
+the Constitution.
+
+Despotic as he was and became, Bonaparte always called the other
+Consuls about him before proceeding with the most trivial
+measure. The Legislative Corps did not exercise much influence
+during his reign, but he signed no decrees of any kind without
+first discussing them with the Council of State. This Council,
+composed of the most enlightened and learned men of France,
+prepared laws, which were then presented to the Legislative
+Corps, which could criticise them very freely, since voting was
+secret. Presided over by Bonaparte, the Council of State was a
+kind of sovereign tribunal, judging even the actions of
+ministers.[9]
+
+
+
+[9] Napoleon naturally often overruled the Council of State, but
+by no means always did so. In one instance, reported in the
+Memorial de Sainte-Helene, he was the only one of his own
+opinion, and accepted that of the majority in the following
+terms: ``Gentlemen, matters are decided here by majority, and
+being alone, I must give way; but I declare that in my conscience
+I yield only to form. You have reduced me to silence, but in no
+way convinced me.''
+
+Another day the Emperor, interrupted three times in the
+expression of his opinion, addressed himself to the speaker who
+had just interrupted him: ``Sir, I have not yet finished; I beg
+you to allow me to continue. After all, it seems to me that
+every one has a perfect right to express his opinion here.''
+
+``The Emperor, contrary to the accepted opinion, was so far from
+absolute, and so easy with his Council of State, that he often
+resumed a discussion, or even annulled a decision, because one of
+the members of the Council had since, in private, given him fresh
+reasons, or had urged that the Emperor's personal opinion had
+influenced the majority.''
+
+
+
+
+The new master had great confidence in this Council, as it was
+composed more particularly of eminent jurists, each of whom dealt
+with his own speciality. He was too good a psychologist not to
+entertain the greatest suspicion of large and incompetent
+assemblies of popular origin, whose disastrous results had been
+obvious to him during the whole of the Revolution.
+
+Wishing to govern for the people, but never with its assistance,
+Bonaparte accorded it no part in the government, reserving to it
+only the right of voting, once for all, for or against the
+adoption of the new Constitution. He only in rare instances had
+recourse to universal suffrage. The members of the Legislative
+Corps recruited themselves, and were not elected by the people.
+
+In creating a Constitution intended solely to fortify his own
+power, the First Consul had no illusion that it would serve to
+restore the country. Consequently, while he was drafting it he
+also undertook the enormous task of the administrative, judicial,
+and financial reorganisation of France. The various powers were
+centralised in Paris. Each department was directed by a prefect,
+assisted by a consul-general; the arrondissement by a sub-
+prefect, assisted by a council; the commune by a mayor, assisted
+by a municipal council. All were appointed by the ministers, and
+not by election, as under the Republic.
+
+This system, which created the omnipotent State and a powerful
+centralisation, was retained by all subsequent Governments and is
+preserved to-day. Centralisation being, in spite of its
+drawbacks, the only means of avoiding local tyrannies in a
+country profoundly divided within itself, has always been
+maintained.
+
+This organisation, based on a profound knowledge of the soul of
+the French people, immediately restored that tranquillity and
+order which had for so long been unknown.
+
+To complete the mental pacification of the country, the political
+exiles were recalled and the churches restored to the faithful.
+
+Continuing to rebuild the social edifice, Bonaparte busied
+himself also with the drafting of a code, the greater part of
+which consisted of customs borrowed from the ancien regime.
+It was, as has been said, a sort of transition or compromise
+between the old law and the new.
+
+Considering the enormous task accomplished by the First Consul in
+so short a time, we realise that he had need, before all, of a
+Constitution according him absolute power. If all the measures
+by which he restored France had been submitted to assemblies of
+attorneys, he could never have extricated the country from the
+disorder into which it had fallen.
+
+The Constitution of the year VIII. obviously transformed the
+Republic into a monarchy at least as absolute as the ``Divine
+right'' monarchy of Louis XIV. Being the only Constitution
+adapted to the needs of the moment, it represented a
+psychological necessity.
+
+
+3. Psychological Elements which determined the Success of the
+Work of the Consulate.
+
+
+All the external forces which act upon men--economic, historical,
+geographical, &c.--may be finally translated into psychological
+forces. These psychological forces a ruler must understand in
+order to govern. The Revolutionary Assemblies were completely
+ignorant of them; Bonaparte knew how to employ them.
+
+The various Assemblies, the Convention notably, were composed of
+conflicting parties. Napoleon understood that to dominate them
+he must not belong to any one of these parties. Very well aware
+that the value of a country is disseminated among the superior
+intelligences of the various parties, he tried to utilise them
+all. His agents of government--ministers, priests, magistrates,
+&c.--were taken indifferently from among the Liberals, Royalists,
+Jacobites, &c., having regard only to their capacities.
+
+While accepting the assistance of men of the ancien regime,
+Bonaparte took care to make it understood that he intended to
+maintain the fundamental principles of the Revolution.
+Nevertheless many Royalists rallied round the new Government.
+
+One of the most remarkable feats of the Consulate, from the
+psychological point of view, was the restoration of religious
+peace. France was far more divided by religious disagreement
+than by political differences. The systematic destruction of a
+portion of the Vendee had almost completely terminated the
+struggle by force of arms, but without pacifying men's minds. As
+only one man, and he the head of Christianity, could assist in
+this pacification, Bonaparte did not hesitate to treat with him.
+His concordat was the work of a real psychologist, who knew that
+moral forces do not use violence, and the great danger of
+persecuting such. While conciliating the clergy he contrived to
+place them under his own domination. The bishops were to
+be appointed and remunerated by the State, so that he would still
+be master.
+
+The religious policy of Napoleon had a bearing which escapes our
+modern Jacobins. Blinded by their narrow fanaticism, they do not
+understand that to detach the Church from the Government is to
+create a state within the State, so that they are liable to find
+themselves opposed by a formidable caste, directed by a master
+outside France, and necessarily hostile to France. To give one's
+enemies a liberty they did not possess is extremely dangerous.
+Never would Napoleon, nor any of the sovereigns who preceded him,
+have consented to make the clergy independent of the State, as
+they have become to-day.
+
+The difficulties of Bonaparte the First Consul were far greater
+than those he had to surmount after his coronation. Only a
+profound knowledge of men enabled him to triumph over them. The
+future master was far from being the master as yet. Many
+departments were still in insurrection. Brigandage persisted,
+and the Midi was ravaged by the struggles of partisans.
+Bonaparte, as Consul, had to conciliate and handle Talleyrand,
+Fouche, and a number of generals who thought themselves his
+equal. Even his brothers conspired against his power. Napoleon,
+as Emperor, had no hostile party to face, but as Consul he
+had to combat all the parties and to hold the balance equal among
+them. This must indeed have been a difficult task, since during
+the last century very few Governments have succeeded in
+accomplishing it.
+
+The success of such an undertaking demanded an extremely subtle
+mixture of finesse, firmness, and diplomacy. Not feeling
+himself powerful enough as yet, Bonaparte the Consul made a rule,
+according to his own expression, ``of governing men as the
+greater number wish to be governed.'' As Emperor he often
+managed to govern them according to his own ideal.
+
+We have travelled a long way since the time when historians, in
+their singular blindness, and great poets, who possessed more
+talent than psychology, would hold forth in indignant accents
+against the coup d'etat of Brumaire. What profound
+illusions underlay the assertion that ``France lay fair in
+Messidor's great sun''! And other illusions no less profound
+underlay such verdicts as that of Victor Hugo concerning this
+period. We have seen that the ``Crime of Brumaire'' had as an
+enthusiastic accomplice, not only the Government itself but the
+whole of France, which it delivered from anarchy.
+
+One may wonder how intelligent men could so misjudge a period of
+history which is nevertheless so clear. It was doubtless because
+they saw events through their own convictions, and we know what
+transformations the truth may suffer for the man who is
+imprisoned in the valleys of belief. The most luminous facts are
+obscured, and the history of events is the history of his dreams.
+
+The psychologist who desires to understand the period which we
+have so briefly sketched can only do so if, being attached to no
+party, he stands clear of the passions which are the soul of
+parties. He will never dream of recriminating a past which was
+dictated by such imperious necessities. Certainly Napoleon has
+cost France dear: his epic was terminated by two invasions, and
+there was yet to be a third, whose consequences are felt
+even to-day, when the prestige which he exerted even from the
+tomb set upon the throne the inheritor of his name.
+
+All these events are narrowly connected in their origin. They
+represent the price of that capital phenomenon in the evolution
+of a people, a change of ideal. Man can never make the attempt
+to break suddenly with his ancestors without profoundly affecting
+the course of his own history.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER III
+
+POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN TRADITIONS AND
+REVOLUTIONARY PRINCIPLES DURING THE LAST CENTURY
+
+1. The Psychological Causes of the continued Revolutionary
+Movements to which France has been subject.
+
+In examining, in a subsequent chapter, the evolution of
+revolutionary ideas during the last century, we shall see that
+during more than fifty years they very slowly spread through the
+various strata of society.
+
+During the whole of this period the great majority of the people
+and the bourgeoisie rejected them, and their diffusion was
+effected only by a very limited number of apostles. But their
+influence, thanks principally to the faults of Governments, was
+sufficient to provoke several revolutions. We shall examine
+these briefly when we have examined the psychological influences
+which gave them birth.
+
+The history of our political upheavals during the last century is
+enough to prove, even if we did not yet realise the fact, that
+men are governed by their mentalities far more than by the
+institutions which their rulers endeavour to force upon them.
+
+The successive revolutions which France has suffered have been
+the consequences of struggles between two portions of the
+nation whose mentalities are different. One is religious and
+monarchical and is dominated by long ancestral influences; the
+other is subjected to the same influences, but gives them a
+revolutionary form.
+
+From the commencement of the Revolution the struggle between
+contrary mentalities was plainly manifested. We have seen that
+in spite of the most frightful repression insurrections and
+conspiracies lasted until the end of the Directory. They proved
+that the traditions of the past had left profound roots in the
+popular soul. At a certain moment sixty departments were in
+revolt against the new Government, and were only repressed by
+repeated massacres on a vast scale.
+
+To establish some sort of compromise between the ancien
+regime and the new ideals was the most difficult of the
+problems which Bonaparte had to resolve. He had to discover
+institutions which would suit the two mentalities into which
+France was divided. He succeeded, as we have seen, by
+conciliatory measures, and also by dressing very ancient things
+in new names.
+
+His reign was one of those rare periods of French history during
+which the mental unity of France was complete.
+
+This unity could not outlive him. On the morrow of his fall all
+the old parties reappeared, and have survived until the present
+day. Some attach themselves to traditional influences; others
+violently reject them.
+
+If this long conflict had been between believers and the
+indifferent, it could not have lasted, for indifference is
+always tolerant; but the struggle was really between two
+different beliefs. The lay Church very soon assumed a religious
+aspect, and its pretended rationalism has become, especially in
+recent years, a barely attenuated form of the narrowest clerical
+spirit. Now, we have shown that no conciliation is possible
+between dissimilar religious beliefs. The clericals when in
+power could not therefore show themselves more tolerant towards
+freethinkers than these latter are to-day toward the clericals.
+
+These divisions, determined by differences of belief, were
+complicated by the addition of the political conceptions derived
+from those beliefs.
+
+Many simple souls have for long believed that the real history of
+France began with the year I. of the Republic. This rudimentary
+conception is at last dying out. Even the most rigid
+revolutionaries renounce it,[10] and are quite willing to
+recognise that the past was something better than an epoch of
+black barbarism dominated by low superstitions.
+
+
+
+[10] We may judge of the recent evolution of ideas upon this
+point by the following passage from a speech by M. Jaures,
+delivered in the Chamber of Deputies: ``The greatness of to-day
+is built of the efforts of past centuries. France is not
+contained in a day nor in an epoch, but in the succession of all
+days, all periods, all her twilights and all her dawns.''
+
+
+
+
+The religious origin of most of the political beliefs held in
+France inspires their adepts with an inextinguishable hatred
+which always strikes foreigners with amazement.
+
+``Nothing is more obvious, nothing is more certain,'' writes Mr.
+Barret-Wendell, in his book on France, ``than this fact: that not
+only have the royalists, revolutionaries, and Bonapartists
+always been mortally opposed to one another, but that, owing to
+the passionate ardour of the French character, they have always
+entertained a profound intellectual horror for one another. Men
+who believe themselves in possession of the truth cannot refrain
+from affirming that those who do not think with them are
+instruments of error.
+
+``Each party will gravely inform you that the advocates of the
+adverse cause are afflicted by a dense stupidity or are
+consciously dishonest. Yet when you meet these latter, who will
+say exactly the same things as their detractors, you cannot but
+recognise, in all good faith, that they are neither stupid nor
+dishonest.''
+
+This reciprocal execration of the believers of each party has
+always facilitated the overthrow of Governments and ministers in
+France. The parties in the minority will never refuse to ally
+themselves against the triumphant party. We know that a great
+number of revolutionary Socialists have been elected to the
+present Chamber only by the aid of the monarchists, who are still
+as unintelligent as they were at the time of the Revolution.
+
+Our religious and political differences do not constitute the
+only cause of dissension in France. They are held by men
+possessing that particular mentality which I have already
+described under the name of the revolutionary mentality. We have
+seen that each period always presents a certain number of
+individuals ready to revolt against the established order of
+things, whatever that may be, even though it may realise all
+their desires.
+
+The intolerance of the parties in France, and their desire to
+seize upon power, are further favoured by the conviction, so
+prevalent under the Revolution, that societies can be remade by
+means of laws. The modern State, whatever its leader, has
+inherited in the eyes of the multitudes and their leaders the
+mystic power attributed to the ancient kings, when these latter
+were regarded as an incarnation of the Divine will. Not only the
+people is inspired by this confidence in the power of Government;
+all our legislators entertain it also.[11]
+
+
+
+[11] After the publication of an article of mine concerning
+legislative illusions, I received from one of our most eminent
+politicians, M. Boudenot the senator, a letter from which I
+extract the following passage: ``Twenty years passed in the
+Chamber and the Senate have shown me how right you are. How many
+times I have heard my colleagues say: `The Government ought to
+prevent this, order that,' &c. What would you have? there are
+fourteen centuries of monarchical atavism in our blood.''
+
+
+
+
+Legislating always, politicians never realise that as
+institutions are effects, and not causes, they have no virtue in
+themselves. Heirs to the great revolutionary illusion, they do
+not see that man is created by a past whose foundations we are
+powerless to reshape.
+
+The conflict between the principles dividing France, which has
+lasted more than a century, will doubtless continue for a long
+time yet, and no one can foresee what fresh upheavals it may
+engender. No doubt if before our era the Athenians could have
+divined that their social dissensions would have led to the
+enslavement of Greece, they would have renounced them; but how
+could they have foreseen as much? M. Guiraud justly writes: ``A
+generation of men very rarely realises the task which it
+is accomplishing. It is preparing for the future; but this
+future is often the contrary of what it wishes.''
+
+
+2. Summary of a Century's Revolutionary Movement in France.
+
+
+The psychological causes of the revolutionary movements which
+France has seen during the past century having been explained, it
+will now suffice to present a summary picture of these successive
+revolutions.
+
+The sovereigns in coalition having defeated Napoleon, they
+reduced France to her former limits, and placed Louis XVIII., the
+only possible sovereign, on the throne.
+
+By a special charter the new king accepted the position of a
+constitutional monarch under a representative system of
+government. He recognised all the conquests of the Revolution:
+the civil Code, equality before the law, liberty of worship,
+irrevocability of the sale of national property, &c. The right
+of suffrage, however, was limited to those paying a certain
+amount in taxes.
+
+This liberal Constitution was opposed by the ultra-royalists.
+Returned emigres, they wanted the restitution of the national
+property, and the re-establishment of their ancient privileges.
+
+Fearing that such a reaction might cause a new revolution, Louis
+XVIII. was reduced to dissolving the Chamber. The election
+having returned moderate deputies, he was able to continue to
+govern with the same principles, understanding very well that any
+attempt to govern the French by the ancien regime would be
+enough to provoke a general rebellion.
+
+Unfortunately, his death, in 1824, placed Charles X., formerly
+Comte d'Artois, on the throne. Extremely narrow, incapable of
+understanding the new world which surrounded him, and boasting
+that he had not modified his ideas since 1789, he prepared a
+series of reactionary laws--a law by which an indemnity of forty
+millions sterling was to be paid to emigres; a law of sacrilege;
+and laws establishing the rights of primogeniture, the
+preponderance of the clergy, &c.
+
+The majority of the deputies showing themselves daily more
+opposed to his projects, in 1830 he enacted Ordinances dissolving
+the Chamber, suppressing the liberty of the Press, and preparing
+for the restoration of the ancien regime.
+
+The effect was immediate. This autocratic action provoked a
+coalition of the leaders of all parties. Republicans,
+Bonapartists, Liberals, Royalists--all united in order to raise
+the Parisian populace. Four days after the publication of the
+Ordinances the insurgents were masters of the capital, and
+Charles X. fled to England.
+
+The leaders of the movement--Thiers, Casimir-Perier, La Fayette,
+&c.--summoned to Paris Louis-Philippe, of whose existence the
+people were scarcely aware, and declared him king of the French.
+
+Between the indifference of the people and the hostility of the
+nobles, who had remained faithful to the legitimate dynasty, the
+new king relied chiefly upon the bourgeoisie. An electoral law
+having reduced the electors to less than 200,000, this class
+played an exclusive part in the government.
+
+The situation of the sovereign was not easy. He had to struggle
+simultaneously against the legitimist supporters of Henry
+V. the grandson of Charles X., and the Bonapartists, who
+recognised as their head Louis-Napoleon, the Emperor's nephew,
+and finally against the republicans.
+
+By means of their secret societies, analogous to the clubs of the
+Revolution, the latter provoked numerous riots at various
+intervals between 1830 and 1840, but these were easily repressed.
+
+The clericals and legitimists, on their side, did not cease their
+intrigues. The Duchess de Berry, the mother of Henry V., tried
+in vain to raise the Vendee. As to the clergy, their demands
+finally made them so intolerable that an insurrection broke out,
+in the course of which the palace of the archbishop of Paris was
+sacked.
+
+The republicans as a party were not very dangerous, as the
+Chamber sided with the king in the struggle against them. The
+minister Guizot, who advocated a strong central power, declared
+that two things were indispensable to government--``reason and
+cannon.'' The famous statesman was surely somewhat deluded as to
+the necessity or efficacy of reason.
+
+Despite this strong central power, which in reality was not
+strong, the republicans, and above all the Socialists, continued
+to agitate. One of the most influential, Louis Blanc, claimed
+that it was the duty of the Government to procure work for every
+citizen. The Catholic party, led by Lacordaire and Montalembert,
+united with the Socialists--as to-day in Belgium--to oppose the
+Government.
+
+A campaign in favour of electoral reform ended in 1848 in a fresh
+riot, which unexpectedly overthrew Louis-Philippe.
+
+His fall was far less justifiable than that of Charles X. There
+was little with which he could be reproached. Doubtless he was
+suspicious of universal suffrage, but the French Revolution had
+more than once been quite suspicious of it. Louis-Philippe not
+being, like the Directory, an absolute ruler, could not, as the
+latter had done, annul unfavourable elections.
+
+A provisional Government was installed in the Hotel de Ville,
+to replace the fallen monarchy. It proclaimed the Republic,
+established universal suffrage, and decreed that the people
+should proceed to the election of a National Assembly of nine
+hundred members.
+
+From the first days of its existence the new Government found
+itself the victim of socialistic manoeuvres and riots.
+
+The psychological phenomena observed during the first Revolution
+were now to be witnessed again. Clubs were formed, whose leaders
+sent the people from time to time against the Assembly, for
+reasons which were generally quite devoid of common sense--for
+example, to force the Government to support an insurrection in
+Poland, &c.
+
+In the hope of satisfying the Socialists, every day more noisy
+and exigent, the Assembly organised national workshops, in which
+the workers were occupied in various forms of labour. In these
+100,000 men cost the State more than L40,000 weekly. Their
+claim to receive pay without working for it forced the Assembly
+to close the workshops.
+
+This measure was the origin of a formidable insurrection, 50,000
+workers revolting. The Assembly, terrified, confided all
+the executive powers to General Cavaignac. There was a four-days
+battle with the insurgents, during which three generals and the
+Archbishop of Paris were killed; 3,000 prisoners were deported by
+the Assembly to Algeria, and revolutionary Socialism was
+annihilated for a space of fifty years.
+
+These events brought Government stock down from 116 to 50 francs.
+Business was at a standstill. The peasants, who thought
+themselves threatened by the Socialists, and the bourgeois,
+whose taxes the Assembly had increased by half, turned against
+the Republic, and when Louis-Napoleon promised to re-establish
+order he found himself welcomed with enthusiasm. A candidate for
+the position of President of the Republic, who according to the
+new Constitution must be elected by the whole body of citizens,
+he was chosen by 5,500,000 votes.
+
+Very soon at odds with the Chamber, the prince decided on a coup
+d'etat. The Assembly was dissolved; 30,000 persons were
+arrested, 10,000 deported, and a hundred deputies were exiled.
+
+This coup d'etat, although summary, was very favourably
+received, for when submitted to a plebiscite it received
+7,500,000 votes out of 8,000,000.
+
+On the 2nd of November, 1852, Napoleon had himself named Emperor
+by an even greater majority: The horror which the generality of
+Frenchmen felt for demagogues and Socialists had restored the
+Empire.
+
+In the first part of its existence it constituted an absolute
+Government, and during the latter half a liberal Government.
+After eighteen years of rule the Emperor was overthrown by the
+revolution of the 4th of September, 1870, after the capitulation
+of Sedan.
+
+Since that time revolutionary movements have been rare; the only
+one of importance was the revolution of March, 1871, which
+resulted in the burning of many of the monuments of Paris and the
+execution of about 20,000 insurgents.
+
+After the war of 1870 the electors, who, amid so many disasters,
+did not know which way to turn, sent a great number of Orleanist
+and legitimist deputies to the Constituent Assembly. Unable to
+agree upon the establishment of a monarchy, they appointed M.
+Thiers President of the Republic, later replacing him by Marshal
+MacMahon. In 1876 the new elections, like all those that have
+followed, sent a majority of republicans to the Chamber.
+
+The various assemblies which have succeeded to this have always
+been divided into numerous parties, which have provoked
+innumerable changes of ministry.
+
+However, thanks to the equilibrium resulting from this division
+of parties, we have for forty years enjoyed comparative quiet.
+Four Presidents of the Republic have been overthrown without
+revolution, and the riots that have occurred, such as those of
+Champagne and the Midi, have not had serious consequences.
+
+A great popular movement, in 1888, did nearly overthrow the
+Republic for the benefit of General Boulanger, but it has
+survived and triumphed over the attacks of all parties.
+
+Various reasons contribute to the maintenance of the present
+Republic. In the first place, of the conflicting factions
+none is strong enough to crush the rest. In the second place,
+the head of the State being purely decorative, and possessing no
+power, it is impossible to attribute to him the evils from which
+the country may suffer, and to feel sure that matters would be
+different were he overthrown. Finally, as the supreme power is
+distributed among thousands of hands, responsibilities are so
+disseminated that it would be difficult to know where to begin.
+A tyrant can be overthrown, but what can be done against a host
+of little anonymous tyrannies?
+
+If we wished to sum up in a word the great transformations which
+have been effected in France by a century of riots and
+revolutions, we might say that individual tyranny, which was weak
+and therefore easily overthrown, has been replaced by collective
+tyrannies, which are very strong and difficult to destroy. To a
+people avid of equality and habituated to hold its Governments
+responsible for every event individual tyranny seemed
+insupportable, while a collective tyranny is readily endured,
+although generally much more severe.
+
+The extension of the tyranny of the State has therefore been the
+final result of all our revolutions, and the common
+characteristic of all systems of government which we have known
+in France. This form of tyranny may be regarded as a racial
+ideal, since successive upheavals of France have only fortified
+it. Statism is the real political system of the Latin peoples,
+and the only system that receives all suffrages. The other forms
+of government--republic, monarchy, empire--represent empty
+labels, powerless shadows.
+
+
+PART III
+
+THE RECENT EVOLUTION OF THE REVOLUTIONARY PRINCIPLES
+
+
+CHAPTER I
+
+THE PROGRESS OF DEMOCRATIC BELIEFS SINCE THE REVOLUTION
+
+1. Gradual Propagation of Democratic Ideas after the Revolution.
+
+Ideas which are firmly established, incrusted, as it were, in
+men's minds, continue to act for several generations. Those
+which resulted from the French Revolution were, like others,
+subject to this law.
+
+Although the life of the Revolution as a Government was short,
+the influence of its principles was, on the contrary, very long-
+lived. Becoming a form of religious belief, they profoundly
+modified the orientation of the sentiments and ideas of several
+generations.
+
+Despite a few intervals, the French Revolution has continued up
+to the present, and still survives. The role of Napoleon
+was not confined to overturning the world, changing the map of
+Europe, and remaking the exploits of Alexander. The new rights
+of the people, created by the Revolution and established by its
+institutions, have exercised a profound influence. The military
+work of the conqueror was soon dissolved, but the revolutionary
+principles which he contributed to propagate have survived him.
+
+The various restorations which followed the Empire caused men at
+first to become somewhat forgetful of the principles of the
+Revolution. For fifty years this propagation was far from rapid.
+One might almost have supposed that the people had forgotten
+them. Only a small number of theorists maintained their
+influence. Heirs to the ``simplicist'' spirit of the Jacobins,
+believing, like them, that societies can be remade from top to
+bottom by the laws, and persuaded that the Empire had only
+interrupted the task of revolution, they wished to resume it.
+
+While waiting until they could recommence, they attempted to
+spread the principles of the Revolution by means of their
+writings. Faithful imitators of the men of the Revolution, they
+never stopped to ask if their schemes for reform were in
+conformity with human nature. They too were erecting a
+chimerical society for an ideal man, and were persuaded that the
+application of their dreams would regenerate the human species.
+
+Deprived of all constructive power, the theorists of all the ages
+have always been very ready to destroy. Napoleon at St. Helena
+stated that ``if there existed a monarchy of granite the
+idealists and theorists would manage to reduce it to powder.''
+
+Among the galaxy of dreamers such as Saint-Simon, Fourier, Pierre
+Leroux, Louis Blanc, Quinet, &c., we find that only Auguste Comte
+understood that a transformation of manners and ideas must
+precede political reorganisation.
+
+Far from favouring the diffusion of democratic ideas, the
+projects of reform of the theorists of this period merely impeded
+their progress. Communistic Socialism, which several of
+them professed would restore the Revolution, finally alarmed the
+bourgeoisie and even the working-classes. We have already seen
+that the fear of their ideas was one of the principal causes of
+the restoration of the Empire.
+
+If none of the chimerical lucubrations of the writers of the
+first half of the nineteenth century deserve to be discussed, it
+is none the less interesting to examine them in order to observe
+the part played by religious and moral ideas which to-day are
+regarded with contempt. Persuaded that a new society could not,
+any more than the societies of old, be built up without religious
+and moral beliefs, the reformers were always endeavouring to
+found such beliefs.
+
+But on what could they be based? Evidently on reason. By means
+of reason men create complicated machines: why not therefore a
+religion and a morality, things which are apparently so simple?
+Not one of them suspected the fact that no religious or moral
+belief ever had rational logic as its basis. Auguste Comte saw
+no more clearly. We know that he founded a so-called positivist
+religion, which still has a few followers. Scientists were to
+form a clergy directed by a new Pope, who was to replace the
+Catholic Pope.
+
+All these conceptions--political, religious, or moral--had, I
+repeat, no other results for a long time than to turn the
+multitude away from democratic principles.
+
+If these principles did finally become widespread, it was not on
+account of the theorists, but because new conditions of life had
+arisen. Thanks to the discoveries of science, industry developed
+and led to the erection of immense factories. Economic
+necessities increasingly dominated the wills of Governments and
+the people and finally created a favourable soil for the
+extension of Socialism, and above all of Syndicalism, the modern
+forms of democratic ideas.
+
+
+2. The Unequal Influence of the Three Fundamental Principles of
+the Revolution.
+
+
+The heritage of the Revolution is summed up in its entirety in
+the one phrase--Liberty, equality, and Fraternity. The
+principle of equality, as we have seen, has exerted a powerful
+influence, but the two others did not share its lot.
+
+Although the sense of these terms seems clear enough, they were
+comprehended in very different fashions according to men and
+times. We know that the various interpretation of the same words
+by persons of different mentality has been one of the most
+frequent causes of the conflicts of history.
+
+To the member of the Convention liberty signified merely the
+exercise of its unlimited despotism. To a young modern
+``intellectual'' the same word means a general release from
+everything irksome: tradition, law, superiority, &c. To the
+modern Jacobin liberty consists especially in the right to
+persecute his adversaries.
+
+Although political orators still occasionally mention liberty in
+their speeches, they have generally ceased to evoke fraternity.
+It is the conflict of the different classes and not their
+alliance that they teach to-day. Never did a more profound
+hatred divide the various strata of society and the political
+parties which lead them.
+
+But while liberty has become very doubtful and fraternity has
+completely vanished, the principle of equality has grown
+unchecked. It has been supreme in all the political upheavals of
+which France has been the stage during the last century, and has
+reached such a development that our political and social life,
+our laws, manners, and customs are at least in theory based on
+this principle. It constitutes the real legacy of the
+Revolution. The craving for equality, not only before the law,
+but in position and fortune, is the very pivot of the last
+product of democracy: Socialism. This craving is so powerful
+that it is spreading in all directions, although in contradiction
+with all biological and economic laws. It is a new phase of the
+interrupted struggle of the sentiments against reason, in which
+reason so rarely triumphs.
+
+
+2. The Democracy of the ``Intellectuals'' and Popular Democracy.
+
+
+All ideas that have hitherto caused an upheaval of the world of
+men have been subject to two laws: they evolve slowly, and they
+completely change their sense according to the mentalities in
+which they find reception.
+
+A doctrine may be compared to a living being. It subsists only
+by process of transformation. The books are necessarily silent
+upon these variations, so that the phase of things which they
+establish belongs only to the past. They do not reflect the
+image of the living, but of the dead. The written statement of a
+doctrine often represents the most negligible side of that
+doctrine.
+
+I have shown in another work how institutions, arts, and
+languages are modified in passing from one people to another, and
+how the laws of these transformations differ from the truth as
+stated in books. I allude to this matter now merely to show why,
+in examining the subject of democratic ideas, we occupy ourselves
+so little with the text of doctrines, and seek only for the
+psychological elements of which they constitute the vestment, and
+the reactions which they provoke in the various categories of men
+who have accepted them.
+
+Modified rapidly by men of different mentalities, the original
+theory is soon no more than a label which denotes something quite
+unlike itself.
+
+Applicable to religious beliefs, these principles are equally so
+to political beliefs. When a man speaks of democracy, for
+example, must we inquire what this word means to various peoples,
+and also whether in the same people there is not a great
+difference between the democracy of the ``intellectuals'' and
+popular democracy.
+
+In confining ourselves now to the consideration of this latter
+point we shall readily perceive that the democratic ideas to be
+found in books and journals are purely the theories of literary
+people, of which the people know nothing, and by the application
+of which they would have nothing to gain. Although the working-
+man possesses the theoretical right of passing the barriers which
+separate him from the upper classes by a whole series of
+competitions and examinations, his chance of reaching them is in
+reality extremely slight.
+
+The democracy of the lettered classes has no other object than to
+set up a selection which shall recruit the directing classes
+exclusively from themselves. I should have nothing to say
+against this if the selection were real. It would then
+constitute the application of the maxim of Napoleon: ``The true
+method of government is to employ the aristocracy, but under the
+forms of democracy.''
+
+Unhappily the democracy of the ``intellectuals'' would simply
+lead to the substitution of the Divine right of kings by the
+Divine right of a petty oligarchy, which is too often narrow and
+tyrannical. Liberty cannot be created by replacing a tyranny.
+
+Popular democracy by no means aims at manufacturing rulers.
+Dominated entirely by the spirit of equality and the desire to
+ameliorate the lot of the workers, it rejects the idea of
+fraternity, and exhibits no anxiety in respect of liberty. No
+government is conceivable to popular democracy except in the form
+of an autocracy. We see this, not only in history, which shows
+us that since the Revolution all despotic Governments have been
+vigorously acclaimed, but also in the autocratic fashion in which
+the workers' trades unions are conducted.
+
+This profound distinction between the democracy of the lettered
+classes and popular democracy is far more obvious to the workers
+than to the intellectuals. In their mentalities there is nothing
+in common; the two classes do not speak the same language. The
+syndicalists emphatically assert to-day that no alliance could
+possibly exist between them and the politicians of the
+bourgeoisie. This assertion is strictly true.
+
+It was always so, and this, no doubt, is why popular
+democracy, from Plato's to our own times, has never been defended
+by the great thinkers.
+
+This fact has greatly struck Emile Faguet. ``Almost all the
+thinkers of the nineteenth century,'' he says, ``were not
+democrats. When I was writing my Politiques et moralistes du
+XIXe siecle this was my despair. I could not find one who had
+been a democrat; yet I was extremely anxious to find one so that
+I could give the democratic doctrine as formulated by him.''
+
+The eminent writer might certainly have found plenty of
+professional politicians, but these latter rarely belong to the
+category of thinkers.
+
+
+2. Natural Inequalities and Democratic Equalisation.
+
+
+The difficulty of reconciling democratic equalisation with
+natural inequalities constitutes one of the most difficult
+problems of the present hour. We know what are the desires of
+democracy. Let us see what Nature replies to these demands.
+
+The democratic ideas which have so often shaken the world from
+the heroic ages of Greece to modern times are always clashing
+with natural inequalities. Some observers have held, with
+Helvetius, that the inequality between men is created by
+education.
+
+As a matter of fact, Nature does not know such a thing as
+equality. She distributes unevenly genius, beauty, health,
+vigour, intelligence, and all the qualities which confer on their
+possessors a superiority over their fellows.
+
+No theory can alter these discrepancies, so that democratic
+doctrines will remain confined to words until the laws of
+heredity consent to unify the capacities of men.
+
+Can we suppose that societies will ever succeed in establishing
+artificially the equality refused by Nature?
+
+A few theorists have believed for a long time that education
+might effect a general levelling. Many years of experience have
+shown the depth of this illusion.
+
+It would not, however, be impossible for a triumphant Socialism
+to establish equality for a time by rigorously eliminating all
+superior individuals. One can easily foresee what would become
+of a people that had suppressed its best individuals while
+surrounded by other nations progressing by means of their best
+individuals.
+
+Not only does Nature not know equality, but since the beginning
+of the ages she has always realised progress by means of
+successive differentiations--that is to say, by increasing
+inequalities. These alone could raise the obscure cell of the
+early geological periods to the superior beings whose inventions
+were to change the face of the earth.
+
+The same phenomenon is to be observed in societies. The forms of
+democracy which select the better elements of the popular classes
+finally result in the creation of an intellectual aristocracy, a
+result the contrary of the dream of the pure theorists, to beat
+down the superior elements of society to the level of the
+inferior elements.
+
+On the side of natural law, which is hostile to theories of
+equality, are the conditions of modern progress. Science and
+industry demand more and more considerable intellectual
+efforts, so that mental inequalities and the differences of
+social condition which spring from them cannot but become
+accentuated.
+
+We therefore observe this striking phenomenon: as laws and
+institutions seek to level individuals the progress of
+civilisation tends still further to differentiate them. From the
+peasant to the feudal baron the intellectual difference was not
+great, but from the working-man to the engineer it is immense and
+is increasing daily.
+
+Capacity being the principal factor of progress, the capable of
+each class rise while the mediocre remain stationary or sink.
+What could laws do in the face of such inevitable necessities?
+
+In vain do the incapable pretend that, representing number, they
+also represent force. Deprived of the superior brains by whose
+researches all workers profit, they would speedily sink into
+poverty and anarchy.
+
+The capital role of the elect in modern civilisation seems
+too obvious to need pointing out. In the case of civilised
+nations and barbarian peoples, which contain similar averages of
+mediocrities, the superiority of the former arises solely from
+the superior minds which they contain. The United States have
+understood this so thoroughly that they forbid the immigration of
+Chinese workers, whose capacity is identical with that of
+American workers, and who, working for lower wages, tend to
+create a formidable competition with the latter. Despite these
+evidences we see the antagonism between the multitude and the
+elect increasing day by day. At no period were the elect more
+necessary, yet never were they supported with such difficulty.
+
+One of the most solid foundations of Socialism is an intense
+hatred of the elect. Its adepts always forget that scientific,
+artistic, and industrial progress, which creates the strength of
+a country and the prosperity of millions of workers, is due
+solely to a small number of superior brains.
+
+If the worker makes three times as much to-day as he did a
+hundred years ago, and enjoys commodities then unknown to great
+nobles, he owes it entirely to the elect.
+
+Suppose that by some miracle Socialism had been universally
+accepted a century ago. Risk, speculation, initiative--in a
+word, all the stimulants of human activity--being suppressed, no
+progress would have been possible, and the worker would have
+remained as poor as he was. Men would merely have established
+that equality in poverty desired by the jealousy and envy of a
+host of mediocre minds. Humanity will never renounce the
+progress of civilisation to satisfy so low an ideal.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER II
+
+THE RESULTS OF DEMOCRATIC EVOLUTION
+
+1. The Influence upon Social Evolution of Theories of no
+Rational Value.
+
+We have seen that natural laws do not agree with the aspirations
+of democracy. We know, also, that such a statement has never
+affected doctrines already in men's minds. The man led by a
+belief never troubles about its real value.
+
+The philosopher who studies a belief must obviously discuss its
+rational content, but he is more concerned with its influences
+upon the general mind.
+
+Applied to the interpretation of all the great beliefs of
+history, the importance of this distinction is at once evident.
+Jupiter, Moloch, Vishnu, Allah, and so many other divinities,
+were, no doubt, from the rational point of view, mere illusions,
+yet their effect upon the life of the peoples has been
+considerable.
+
+The same distinction is applicable to the beliefs which prevailed
+during the Middle Ages. Equally illusory, they nevertheless
+exercised as profound an influence as if they had corresponded
+with realities.
+
+If any one doubts this, let him compare the domination of the
+Roman Empire and that of the Church of Rome. The first was
+perfectly real and tangible, and implied no illusion. The
+second, while its foundations were entirely chimerical, was fully
+as powerful. Thanks to it, during the long night of the Middle
+Ages, semi-barbarous peoples acquired those social bonds and
+restraints and that national soul without which there is no
+civilisation.
+
+The power possessed by the Church proves, again, that the power
+of certain illusions is sufficiently great to create, at least
+momentarily, sentiments as contrary to the interests of the
+individual as they are to that of society--such as the love of
+the monastic life, the desire for martyrdom, the crusades, the
+religious wars, &c.
+
+The application to democratic and socialistic ideas of the
+preceding considerations shows that it matters little that these
+ideas have no defensible basis. They impress and influence men's
+minds, and that is sufficient. Their results may be disastrous
+in the extreme, but we cannot prevent them.
+
+The apostles of the new doctrines are quite wrong in taking so
+much trouble to find a rational basis for their aspirations.
+They would be far more convincing were they to confine themselves
+to making affirmations and awakening hopes. Their real strength
+resides in the religious mentality which is inherent in the heart
+of man, and which during the ages has only changed its object.
+
+Later on we shall consider from a philosophical point of view
+various consequences of the democratic evolution whose course we
+see accelerating. We may say in respect of the Church in the
+Middle Ages that it had the power of profoundly influencing the
+mentality of men. Examining certain results of the
+democratic doctrines, we shall see that the power of these is no
+less than that of the Church.
+
+
+2. The Jacobin Spirit and the Mentality created by Democratic
+Beliefs.
+
+
+Existing generations have inherited, not only the revolutionary
+principles but also the special mentality which achieves their
+success.
+
+Describing this mentality when we were examining the Jacobin
+spirit, we saw that it always endeavours to impose by force
+illusions which it regards as the truth. The Jacobin spirit has
+finally become so general in France and in other Latin countries
+that it has affected all political parties, even the most
+conservative. The bourgeoisie is strongly affected by it, and
+the people still more so.
+
+This increase of the Jacobin spirit has resulted in the fact that
+political conceptions, institutions, and laws tend to impose
+themselves by force. Syndicalism, peaceful enough in other
+countries, immediately assumed in France an uncompromising and
+anarchical aspect, which betrayed itself in the shape of riots,
+sabotage, and incendiarism.
+
+Not to be repressed by timid Governments, the Jacobin spirit
+produces melancholy ravages in minds of mediocre capacity. At a
+recent congress of railway men a third of the delegates voted
+approval of sabotage, and one of the secretaries of the
+Congress began his speech by saying: ``I send all saboteurs my
+fraternal greeting and all my admiration.''
+
+This general mentality engenders an increasing anarchy. That
+France is not in a permanent state of anarchy is, as I have
+already remarked, due to the fact that the parties by which she
+is divided produce something like equilibrium. They are animated
+by a mortal hatred for one another, but none of them is strong
+enough to enslave its rivals.
+
+This Jacobin intolerance is spreading to such an extent that the
+rulers themselves employ without scruple the most revolutionary
+tactics with regard to their enemies, violently persecuting any
+party that offers the least resistance, and even despoiling it of
+its property. Our rulers to-day behave as the ancient conquerors
+used; the vanquished have nothing to hope from the victors.
+
+Far from being peculiar to the lower orders, intolerance is
+equally prominent among the ruling classes. Michelet remarked
+long ago that the violence of the cultivated classes is often
+greater than that of the people. It is true that they do not
+break the street lamps, but they are ready enough to cause heads
+to be broken. The worst violence of the revolution was the work
+of cultivated bourgeoisie--professors, lawyers, &c., possessors
+of that classical education which is supposed to soften the
+manners. It has not done so in these days, any more than it did
+of old. One can make sure of this by reading the advanced
+journals, whose contributors and editors are recruited chiefly
+from among the professors of the University.
+
+Their books are as violent as their articles, and one wonders how
+such favourites of fortune can have secreted such stores of
+hatred.
+
+One would find it hard to credit them did they assure us that
+they were consumed by an intense passion for altruism. One
+might more readily admit that apart from a narrow religious
+mentality the hope of being remarked by the mighty ones of the
+day, or of creating a profitable popularity, is the only
+possible explanation of the violence recommended in their
+written propaganda.
+
+I have already, in one of my preceding works, cited some passages
+from a book written by a professor at the College of France, in
+which the author incites the people to seize upon the riches of
+the bourgeoisie, whom he furiously abuses, and have arrived at
+the conclusion that a new revolution would readily find among the
+authors of such books the Marats, Robespierres, and Carriers whom
+it might require.
+
+The Jacobin religion--above all in its Socialist form--has all
+the power of the ancient faiths over feeble minds Blinded by
+their faith, they believe that reason is their guide, but are
+really actuated solely by their passions and their dreams.
+
+The evolution of democratic ideas has thus produced not only the
+political results already mentioned, but also a considerable
+effect upon the mentality of modern men.
+
+If the ancient dogmas have long ago exhausted their power, the
+theories of democracy are far from having lost theirs, and we see
+their consequences increasing daily. One of the chief results
+has been the general hatred of superiority.
+
+This hatred of whatever passes the average in social fortune or
+intelligence is to-day general in all classes, from the working-
+classes to the upper strata of the bourgeoisie. The results
+are envy, detraction, and a love of attack, of raillery, of
+persecution, and a habit of attributing all actions to low
+motives, of refusing to believe in probity, disinterestedness,
+and intelligence.
+
+Conversation, among the people as among the most cultivated
+Frenchmen, is stamped with the craze for abasing and abusing
+everything and everyone. Even the greatest of the dead do not
+escape this tendency. Never were so many books written to
+depreciate the merit of famous men, men who were formerly
+regarded as the most precious patrimony of their country.
+
+Envy and hatred seem from all time to have been inseparable from
+democratic theories, but the spread of these sentiments has never
+been so great as to-day. It strikes all observers.
+
+``There is a low demagogic instinct,'' writes M. Bourdeau,
+``without any moral inspiration, which dreams of pulling humanity
+down to the lowest level, and for which any superiority, even of
+culture, is an offence to society. . . it is the sentiment of
+ignoble equality which animated the Jacobin butchers when they
+struck off the head of a Lavoisier or a Chenier.
+
+This hatred of superiority, the most prominent element in the
+modern progress of Socialism, is not the only characteristic of
+the new spirit created by democratic ideas.
+
+Other consequences, although indirect, are not less profound.
+Such, for example, are the progress of ``statism,'' the
+diminution of the power of the bourgeoisie, the increasing
+activity of financiers, the conflict of the classes, the
+vanishing of the old social constraints, and the degradation
+of morality.
+
+All these effects are displayed in a general insubordination and
+anarchy. The son revolts against the father, the employee
+against his patron, the soldier against his officers.
+Discontent, hatred, and envy reign throughout.
+
+A social movement which continues is necessarily like a machine
+in movement which accelerates its motion. We shall therefore
+find that the results of this mentality will become yet more
+important. It is betrayed from time to time by incidents whose
+gravity is daily increasing--railway strikes, postmen's strikes,
+explosions on board ironclads, &c. A propos of the destruction
+of the Liberte, which cost more than two million pounds and
+slew two hundred men in the space of a minute, an ex-Minister of
+Marine, M. de Lanessan, expresses himself as follows:--
+
+''The evil that is gnawing at our fleet is the same as that which
+is devouring our army, our public administrations, our
+parliamentary system, our governmental system, and the whole
+fabric of our society. This evil is anarchy--that is to say,
+such a disorder of minds and things that nothing is done as
+reason would dictate, and no one behaves as his professional or
+moral duty should require him to behave.''
+
+On the subject of the catastrophe of the Liberte, which
+followed that of the Iena, M. Felix Roussel said, in a
+speech delivered as president of the municipal council of
+Paris:--
+
+``The causes of the evil are not peculiar to our day. The evil
+is more general, and bears a triple name: irresponsibility,
+indiscipline, and anarchy.''
+
+These quotations, which state facts with which everyone is
+familiar, show that the staunchest upholders of the republican
+system themselves recognise the progress of social
+disorganisation.[12] Everyone sees it, while he is conscious of
+his own impotence to change anything. It results, in fact, from
+mental influences whose power is greater than that of our wills.
+
+
+
+[12] This disorder is the same in all the Government departments
+Interesting examples will be found in a report of M. Dausset to
+the Municipal Council:--
+
+``The service of the public highways, which ought above all to be
+noted for its rapid execution, is, on the contrary, the very type
+of red-tape, bureaucratic, and ink-slinging administration,
+possessing men and money and wasting both in tasks which are
+often useless, for lack of order, initiative, and method--in a
+word, of organisation.
+
+Speaking then of the directors of departments, each of whom works
+as he pleases, and after his own fashion, he adds:--
+
+``These important persons completely ignore one another; they
+prepare and execute their plans without knowing anything of what
+their neighbours are doing; there is no one above them to group
+and co-ordinate their work.'' This is why a road is often torn
+up, repaired, and then torn up again a few days later, because
+the departments dealing with the supply of water, gas,
+electricity, and the sewers are mutually jealous, and never
+attempt to work together. This anarchy and indiscipline
+naturally cost enormous sums of money, and a private firm which
+operated in this manner would soon find itself bankrupt.
+
+
+
+3. Universal Suffrage and its Representatives.
+
+
+Among the dogmas of democracy perhaps the most fundamental of all
+and the most attractive is that of universal suffrage. It gives
+the masses the idea of equality, since for a moment at least rich
+and poor, learned and ignorant, are equal before the electoral
+urn. The minister elbows the least of his servants, and during
+this brief moment the power of one is as great as the others.
+
+All Governments, including that of the Revolution, have feared
+universal suffrage. At a first glance, indeed, the objections
+which suggests themselves are numerous. The idea that the
+multitude could usefully choose the men capable of governing,
+that individuals of indifferent morality, feeble knowledge, and
+narrow minds should possess, by the sole fact of number, a
+certain talent for judging the candidate proposed for its
+selection is surely a shocking one.
+
+From a rational point of view the suffrage of numbers is to a
+certain extent justified if we think with Pascal.
+
+``Plurality is the best way, because it is visible and has
+strength to make itself obeyed; it is, however, the advice of the
+less able.''
+
+As universal suffrage cannot in our times be replaced by any
+other institution, we must accept it and try to adapt it. It is
+accordingly useless to protest against it or to repeat with the
+queen Marie Caroline, at the time of her struggle with Napoleon:
+``Nothing is more dreadful than to govern men in this enlightened
+century, when every cobbler reasons and criticises the
+Government.''
+
+To tell the truth, the objections are not always as great as they
+appear. The laws of the psychology of crowds being admitted, it
+is very doubtful whether a limited suffrage would give a much
+better choice of men than that obtained by universal suffrage.
+
+These same psychological laws also show us that so-called
+universal suffrage is in reality a pure fiction. The crowd, save
+in very rare cases, has no opinion but that of its leaders.
+Universal suffrage really represents the most limited of
+suffrages.
+
+There justly resides its real danger. Universal suffrage is made
+dangerous by the fact that the leaders who are its masters are
+the creatures of little local committees analogous to the clubs
+of the Revolution. The leader who canvasses for a mandate is
+chosen by them.
+
+Once nominated, he exercises an absolute local power, on
+condition of satisfying the interests of his committees. Before
+this necessity the general interest of the country disappears
+almost totally from the mind of the elected representative.
+
+Naturally the committees, having need of docile servants, do not
+choose for this task individuals gifted with a lofty intelligence
+nor, above all, with a very high morality. They must have men
+without character, without social position, and always docile.
+
+By reason of these necessities the servility of the deputy in
+respect of these little groups which patronise him, and without
+which he would be no one, is absolute. He will speak and vote
+just as his committee tells him. His political ideal may be
+expressed in a few words: it is to obey, that he may retain his
+post.
+
+Sometimes, rarely indeed, and only when by name or position or
+wealth he has a great prestige, a superior character may impose
+himself upon the popular vote by overcoming the tyranny of the
+impudent minorities which constitute the local committees.
+
+Democratic countries like France are only apparently governed by
+universal suffrage. For this reason is it that so many measures
+are passed which do not interest the people and which the people
+never demanded. Such were the purchase of the Western railways,
+the laws respecting congregations, &c. These absurd
+manifestations merely translated the demands of fanatical local
+committees, and were imposed upon deputies whom they had chosen.
+
+We may judge of the influence of these committees when we see
+moderate deputies forced to patronise the anarchical
+destroyers of arsenals, to ally themselves with anti-militarists,
+and, in a word, to obey the most atrocious demands in order to
+ensure re-election. The will of the lowest elements of democracy
+has thus created among the elected representatives manners and a
+morality which we can but recognise are of the lowest. The
+politician is the man in public employment, and as Nietzsche
+says:--
+
+``Where public employment begins there begins also the clamour of
+the great comedians and the buzzing of venomous flies. . . . The
+comedian always believes in that which makes him obtain his best
+effects, in that which impels the people to believe in him. To-
+morrow he will have a new faith, and the day after to-morrow yet
+another. . . . All that is great has its being far from public
+employment and glory.''
+
+
+4. The Craving for Reforms.
+
+
+The craze for reforms imposed suddenly by means of decrees is one
+of the most disastrous conceptions of the Jacobin spirit, one of
+the formidable legacies left by the Revolution. It is among the
+principal factors of all the incessant political upheavals of the
+last century in France.
+
+One of the psychological causes of this intense thirst for
+reforms arises from the difficulty of determining the real causes
+of the evils complained of. The need of explanation creates
+fictitious causes of the simplest nature. Therefore the remedies
+also appear simple.
+
+For forty years we have incessantly been passing reforms, each of
+which is a little revolution in itself. In spite of all these,
+or rather because of them, the French have evolved almost
+as little as any race in Europe.
+
+The slowness of our actual evolution may be seen if we compare
+the principal elements of our social life--commerce, industry,
+&c.--with those of other nations. The progress of other
+nations--of the Germans especially--then appears enormous, while
+our own has been very slow.
+
+Our administrative, industrial, and commercial organisation is
+considerably out of date, and is no longer equal to our new
+needs. Our industry is not prospering; our marine is declining.
+Even in our own colonies we cannot compete with foreign
+countries, despite the enormous pecuniary subventions accorded by
+the State. M. Cruppi, an ex-Minister of Commerce, has insisted
+on this melancholy decline in a recent book. Falling into the
+usual errors, he believed it easy to remedy this inferiority by
+new laws.
+
+All politicians share the same opinion, which is why we progress
+so slowly. Each party is persuaded that by means of reforms all
+evils could be remedied. This conviction results in struggles
+such as have made France the most divided country in the world
+and the most subject to anarchy.
+
+No one yet seems to understand that individuals and their
+methods, not regulations, make the value of a people. The
+efficacious reforms are not the revolutionary reforms but the
+trifling ameliorations of every day accumulated in course of
+time. The great social changes, like the great geological
+changes, are effected by the daily addition of minute causes.
+The economic history of Germany during the last forty
+years proves in a striking manner the truth of this law.
+
+Many important events which seem to depend more or less on
+hazard--as battles, for example--are themselves subject to this
+law of the accumulation of small causes. No doubt the decisive
+struggle is sometimes terminated in a day or less, but many
+minute efforts, slowly accumulated, are essential to victory. We
+had a painful experience of this in 1870, and the Russians have
+learned it more recently. Barely half an hour did Admiral Togo
+need to annihilate the Russian fleet, at the battle of Tsushima,
+which finally decided the fate of Japan, but thousands of little
+factors, small and remote, determined that success. Causes not
+less numerous engendered the defeat of the Russians--a
+bureaucracy as complicated as ours, and as irresponsible;
+lamentable material, although paid for by its weight in gold; a
+system of graft at every degree of the social hierarchy, and
+general indifference to the interests of the country.
+
+Unhappily the progress in little things which by their total make
+up the greatness of a nation is rarely apparent, produces no
+impression on the public, and cannot serve the interests of
+politicians at elections. These latter care nothing for such
+matters, and permit the accumulation, in the countries subject to
+their influence, of the little successive disorganisations which
+finally result in great downfalls.
+
+
+5. Social Distinctions in Democracies and Democratic Ideas in
+Various Countries.
+
+
+When men were divided into castes and differentiated chiefly by
+birth, social distinctions were generally accepted as the
+consequences of an unavoidable natural law.
+
+As soon as the old social divisions were destroyed the
+distinctions of the classes appeared artificial, and for that
+reason ceased to be tolerated.
+
+The necessity of equality being theoretical, we have seen among
+democratic peoples the rapid development of artificial
+inequalities, permitting their possessors to make for themselves
+a plainly visible supremacy. Never was the thirst for titles and
+decorations so general as to-day.
+
+In really democratic countries, such as the United States, titles
+and decorations do not exert much influence, and fortune alone
+creates distinctions. It is only by exception that we see
+wealthy young American girls allying themselves to the old names
+of the European aristocracy. They are then instinctively
+employing the only means which will permit a young race to
+acquire a past that will establish its moral framework.
+
+But in a general fashion the aristocracy that we see springing up
+in America is by no means founded on titles and decorations.
+Purely financial, it does not provoke much jealousy, because
+every one hopes one day to form part of it.
+
+When, in his book on democracy in America, Toqueville spoke of
+the general aspiration towards equality he did not realise that
+the prophesied equality would end in the classification of men
+founded exclusively on the number of dollars possessed by them.
+No other exists in the United States, and it will doubtless one
+day be the same in Europe.
+
+At present we cannot possibly regard France as a democratic
+country save on paper, and here we feel the necessity, already
+referred to, of examining the various ideas which in different
+countries are expressed by the word ``democracy.''
+
+Of truly democratic nations we can practically mention only
+England and the United States. There, democracy occurs in
+different forms, but the same principles are observed--notably, a
+perfect toleration of all opinions. Religious persecutions are
+unknown. Real superiority easily reveals itself in the various
+professions which any one can enter at any age if he possesses
+the necessary capacity. There is no barrier to individual
+effort.
+
+In such countries men believe themselves equal because all have
+the idea that they are free to attain the same position. The
+workman knows he can become foreman, and then engineer. Forced
+to begin on the lower rungs of the ladder instead of high up the
+scale, as in France, the engineer does not regard himself as made
+of different stuff to the rest of mankind. It is the same in all
+professions. This is why the class hatred, so intense in Europe,
+is so little developed in England and America.
+
+In France the democracy is practically non-existent save in
+speeches. A system of competitions and examinations, which must
+be worked through in youth, firmly closes the door upon the
+liberal professions, and creates inimical and separate classes.
+
+The Latin democracies are therefore purely theoretical. The
+absolutism of the State has replaced monarchical absolutism, but
+it is no less severe. The aristocracy of fortune has replaced
+that of birth, and its privileges are no less considerable.
+
+Monarchies and democracies differ far more in form than in
+substance. It is only the variable mentality of men that varies
+their effects. All the discussions as to various systems of
+government are really of no interest, for these have no special
+virtue of themselves. Their value will always depend on that of
+the people governed. A people effects great and rapid progress
+when it discovers that it is the sum of the personal efforts of
+each individual and not the system of government that determines
+the rank of a nation in the world.
+
+
+
+CHAPTER III
+
+THE NEW FORMS OF DEMOCRATIC BELIEF
+
+1. The Conflict between Capital and Labour.
+
+While our legislators are reforming and legislating at hazard,
+the natural evolution of the world is slowly pursuing its course.
+New interests arise, the economic competition between nation and
+nation increases in severity, the working-classes are bestirring
+themselves, and on all sides we see the birth of formidable
+problems which the harangues of the politicians will never
+resolve.
+
+Among these new problems one of the most complicated will be the
+problem of the conflict between labour and capital. It is
+becoming acute even in such a country of tradition as England.
+Workingmen are ceasing to respect the collective contracts which
+formerly constituted their charter, strikes are declared for
+insignificant motives, and unemployment and pauperism are
+attaining disquieting proportions.
+
+In America these strikes would finally have affected all
+industries but that the very excess of the evil created a remedy.
+During the last ten years the industrial leaders have organised
+great employers' federations, which have become powerful enough
+to force the workers to submit to arbitration.
+
+The labour question is complicated in France by the
+intervention of numerous foreign workers, which the stagnation of
+our population has rendered necessary.[13] This stagnation will
+also make it difficult for France to contend with her rivals,
+whose soil will soon no longer be able to nourish its
+inhabitants, who, following one of the oldest laws of history,
+will necessarily invade the less densely peopled countries.
+
+
+
+[13] Population of the Great Powers:--
+ 1789. 1906.
+
+Russia ... ... 28,000,000 129,000,000
+Germany ... ... 28,000,000 57,000,000
+Austria ... ... 18,000,000 44,000,000
+England ... ... 12,000,000 40,000,000
+France ... ... 26,000,000 39,000,000
+
+
+
+
+These conflicts between the workers and employers of the same
+nation will be rendered still more acute by the increasing
+economic struggle between the Asiatics, whose needs are small,
+and who can therefore produce manufactured articles at very low
+prices, and the Europeans, whose needs are many. For twenty-five
+years I have laid stress upon this point. General Hamilton, ex-
+military attache to the Japanese army, who foresaw the
+Japanese victories long before the outbreak of hostilities,
+writes as follows in an essay translated by General Langlois:--
+
+``The Chinaman, such as I have seen him in Manchuria, is capable
+of destroying the present type of worker of the white races. He
+will drive him off the face of the earth. The Socialists, who
+preach equality to the labourer, are far from thinking what would
+be the practical result of carrying out their theories. Is it,
+then, the destiny of the white races to disappear in the long
+run? In my humble opinion this destiny depends upon one
+single factor: Shall we or shall we not have the good sense to
+close our ears to speeches which present war and preparation for
+war as a useless evil?
+
+``I believe the workers must choose. Given the present
+constitution of the world, they must cultivate in their children
+the military ideal, and accept gracefully the cost and trouble
+which militarism entails, or they will be let in for a cruel
+struggle for life with a rival worker of whose success there is
+not the slightest doubt. There is only one means of refusing
+Asiatics the right to emigrate, to lower wages by competition,
+and to live in our midst, and that is the sword. If Americans
+and Europeans forget that their privileged position is held only
+by force of arms, Asia will soon have taken her revenge.''
+
+We know that in America the invasion of Chinese and Japanese,
+owing to the competition between them and the workers of white
+race, has become a national calamity. In Europe the invasion is
+commencing, but has not as yet gone far. But already Chinese
+emigrants have formed important colonies in certain centres--
+London, Cardiff, Liverpool, &c. They have provoked several riots
+by working for low wages. Their appearance has always lowered
+salaries.
+
+But these problems belong to the future, and those of the present
+are so disquieting that it is useless at the moment to occupy
+ourselves with others.
+
+
+2. The Evolution of the Working-Classes and the Syndicalist
+Movement.
+
+
+The most important democratic problem of the day will perhaps
+result from the recent development of the working-class
+engendered by the Syndicalist or Trades Union movement.
+
+The aggregation of similar interests known as Syndicalism has
+rapidly assumed such enormous developments in all countries that
+it may be called world-wide. Certain corporations have budgets
+comparable to those of small States. Some German leagues have
+been cited as having saved over three millions sterling in
+subscriptions.
+
+The extension of the labour movement in all countries shows that
+it is not, like Socialism, a dream of Utopian theorists, but the
+result of economic necessities. In its aim, its means of action,
+and its tendencies, Syndicalism presents no kinship with
+Socialism. Having sufficiently explained it in my Political
+Psychology, it will suffice here to recall in a few words the
+difference between the two doctrines.
+
+Socialism would obtain possession of all industries, and have
+them managed by the State, which would distribute the products
+equally between the citizens. Syndicalism, on the other hand,
+would entirely eliminate the action of the State, and divide
+society into small professional groups which would be
+self-governing.
+
+Although despised by the Syndicalists and violently attacked by
+them, the Socialists are trying to ignore the conflict, but it is
+rapidly becoming too obvious to be concealed. The political
+influence which the Socialists still possess will soon escape
+them.
+
+If Syndicalism is everywhere increasing at the expense of
+Socialism, it is, I repeat, because this corporative movement,
+although a renewal of the past, synthetises certain needs
+born of the specialisation of modern industry.
+
+We see its manifestations under a great variety of circumstances.
+In France its success has not as yet been as great as elsewhere.
+Having taken the revolutionary form already mentioned, it has
+fallen, at least for the time being, into the hands of the
+anarchists, who care as little for Syndicalism as for any sort of
+organisation, and are simply using the new doctrine in an attempt
+to destroy modern society. Socialists, Syndicalists, and
+anarchists, although directed by entirely different conceptions,
+are thus collaborating in the same eventual aim--the violent
+suppression of the ruling classes and the pillage of their
+wealth.
+
+The Syndicalist doctrine does not in any way derive from the
+principles of Revolution. On many points it is entirely in
+contradiction with the Revolution. Syndicalism represents rather
+a return to certain forms of collective organisation similar to
+the guilds or corporations proscribed by the Revolution. It thus
+constitutes one of those federations which the Revolution
+condemned. It entirely rejects the State centralisation which
+the Revolution established.
+
+Syndicalism cares nothing for the democratic principles of
+liberty, equality, and fraternity. The Syndicalists demand of
+their members an absolute discipline which eliminates all
+liberty.
+
+Not being as yet strong enough to exercise mutual tyranny, the
+syndicates so far profess sentiments in respect of one another
+which might by a stretch be called fraternal. But as soon as
+they are sufficiently powerful, when their contrary interests
+will necessarily enter into conflict, as during the Syndicalist
+period of the old Italian republics--Florence and Siena, for
+example--the present fraternity will speedily be forgotten, and
+equality will be replaced by the despotism of the most powerful.
+
+Such a future seems near at hand. The new power is increasing
+very rapidly, and finds the Governments powerless before it, able
+to defend themselves only by yielding to every demand--an odious
+policy, which may serve for the moment, but which heavily
+compromises the future.
+
+It was, however, to this poor recourse that the English
+Government recently resorted in its struggle against the Miners'
+Union, which threatened to suspend the industrial life of
+England. The Union demanded a minimum wage for its members, but
+they were not bound to furnish a minimum of work.
+
+Although such a demand was inadmissible, the Government agreed to
+propose to Parliament a law to sanction such a measure. We may
+profitably read the weighty words pronounced by Mr. Balfour
+before the House of Commons:--
+
+``The country has never in its so long and varied history had to
+face a danger of this nature and this importance.
+
+``We are confronted with the strange and sinister spectacle of a
+mere organisation threatening to paralyse--and paralysing in a
+large measure--the commerce and manufactures of a community which
+lives by commerce and manufacture.
+
+``The power possessed by the miners is in the present state of
+the law almost unlimited. Have we ever seen the like of it? Did
+ever feudal baron exert a comparable tyranny? Was there
+ever an American trust which served the rights which it holds
+from the law with such contempt of the general interest? The
+very degree of perfection to which we have brought our laws, our
+social organisation, the mutual relation between the various
+professions and industries, exposes us more than our predecessors
+in ruder ages to the grave peril which at present threatens
+society. . . . We are witnesses at the present moment of the
+first manifestation of the power of elements which, if we are not
+heedful, will submerge the whole of society. . . . The attitude
+of the Government in yielding to the injunction of the miners
+gives some appearance of reality to the victory of those who are
+pitting themselves against society.''
+
+
+3. Why certain modern Democratic Governments are gradually
+being transformed into Governments by Administrative Castes.
+
+
+Anarchy and the social conflicts resulting from democratic ideas
+are to-day impelling some Governments towards an unforeseen
+course of evolution which will end by leaving them only a nominal
+power. This development, of which I shall briefly denote the
+effects, is effected spontaneously under the stress of those
+imperious necessities which are still the chief controlling power
+of events.
+
+The Governments of democratic countries to-day consist of the
+representatives elected by universal suffrage. They vote laws,
+and appoint and dismiss ministers chosen from themselves, and
+provisionally entrusted with the executive power. These
+ministers are naturally often replaced, since a vote will do
+it. Those who follow them, belonging to a different
+party, will govern according to different principles.
+
+It might at first seem that a country thus pulled to and fro by
+various influences could have no continuity or stability. But in
+spite of all these conditions of instability a democratic
+Government like that of France works with fair regularity. How
+explain such a phenomenon?
+
+Its interpretation, which is very simple, results from the fact
+that the ministers who have the appearance of governing really
+govern the country only to a very limited extent. Strictly
+limited and circumscribed, their power is exercised principally
+in speeches which are hardly noticed and in a few inorganic
+measures.
+
+But behind the superficial authority of ministers, without force
+or duration, the playthings of every demand of the politician, an
+anonymous power is secretly at work whose might is continually
+increasing the administrations. Possessing traditions, a
+hierarchy, and continuity, they are a power against which, as the
+ministers quickly realise, they are incapable of struggling.[14]
+Responsibility is so divided in the administrative machine that a
+minister may never find himself opposed by any person of
+importance. His momentary impulses are checked by a network of
+regulations, customs, and decrees, which are continually quoted
+to him, and which he knows so little that he dare not infringe
+them.
+
+
+
+[14] The impotence of ministers in their own departments has been
+well described by one of them, M. Cruppi, in a recent book. The
+most ardent wishes of the minister being immediately paralysed by
+his department, he promptly ceases to struggle against it.
+
+
+
+
+This diminution of the power of democratic Governments can
+only develop. One of the most constant laws of history is that
+of which I have already spoken: Immediately any one class
+becomes preponderant--nobles, clergy, army, or the people--it
+speedily tends to enslave others. Such were the Roman armies,
+which finally appointed and overthrew the emperors; such were the
+clergy, against whom the kings of old could hardly struggle; such
+were the States General, which at the moment of Revolution
+speedily absorbed all the powers of government, and supplanted
+the monarchy.
+
+The caste of functionaries is destined to furnish a fresh proof
+of the truth of this law. Preponderant already, they are
+beginning to speak loudly, to make threats, and even to indulge
+in strikes, such as that of the postmen, which was quickly
+followed by that of the Government railway employees. The
+administrative power thus forms a little State within the State,
+and if its present rate of revolution continues it will soon
+constitute the only power in the State. Under a Socialist
+Government there would be no other power. All our revolutions
+would then have resulted in stripping the king of his powers and
+his throne in order to bestow them upon the irresponsible,
+anonymous and despotic class of Government clerks.
+
+To foresee the issue of all the conflicts which threaten to cloud
+the future is impossible. We must steer clear of pessimism as of
+optimism; all we can say is that necessity will always finally
+bring things to an equilibrium. The world pursues its way
+without bothering itself with our speeches, and sooner or later
+we manage to adapt ourselves to the variations of our
+environment. The difficulty is to do so without too much
+friction, and above all to resist the chimerical conceptions of
+dreamers. Always powerless to re-organise the world, they have
+often contrived to upset it.
+
+Athens, Rome, Florence, and many other cities which formerly
+shone in history, were victims of these terrible theorists. The
+results of their influence has always been the same--anarchy,
+dictatorship, and decadence.
+
+But such lessons will not affect the numerous Catilines of the
+present day. They do not yet see that the movements unchained by
+their ambitions threaten to submerge them. All these Utopians
+have awakened impossible hopes in the mind of the crowd, excited
+their appetites, and sapped the dykes which have been slowly
+erected during the centuries to restrain them.
+
+The struggle of the blind multitudes against the elect is one of
+the continuous facts of history, and the triumph of popular
+sovereignties without counterpoise has already marked the end of
+more than one civilisation. The elect create, the plebs
+destroys. As soon as the first lose their hold the latter begins
+its precious work.
+
+The great civilisations have only prospered by dominating their
+lower elements. It is not only in Greece that anarchy,
+dictatorship, invasion, and, finally, the loss of independence
+has resulted from the despotism of a democracy. Individual
+tyranny is always born of collective tyranny. It ended the first
+cycle of the greatness of Rome; the Barbarians achieved the
+second.
+
+
+
+CONCLUSIONS
+
+The principal revolutions of history have been studied in this
+volume. But we have dealt more especially with the most
+important of all--that which for more than twenty years
+overwhelmed all Europe, and whose echoes are still to be heard.
+
+The French Revolution is an inexhaustible mine of psychological
+documents. No period of the life of humanity has presented such
+a mass of experience, accumulated in so short a time.
+
+On each page of this great drama we have found numerous
+applications of the principles expounded in my various works,
+concerning the transitory mentality of crowds and the permanent
+soul of the peoples, the action of beliefs, the influence of
+mystic, affective, and collective elements, and the conflict
+between the various forms of logic.
+
+The Revolutionary Assemblies illustrate all the known laws of the
+psychology of crowds. Impulsive and timid, they are dominated by
+a small number of leaders, and usually act in a sense contrary to
+the wishes of their individual members.
+
+The Royalist Constituent Assembly destroyed an ancient monarchy;
+the humanitarian Legislative Assembly allowed the massacres of
+September. The same pacific body led France into the most
+formidable campaigns.
+
+There were similar contradictions during the Convention. The
+immense majority of its members abhorred violence. Sentimental
+philosophers, they exalted equality, fraternity, and liberty, yet
+ended by exerting the most terrible despotism.
+
+The same contradictions were visible during the Directory.
+Extremely moderate in their intentions at the outset, the
+Assemblies were continually effecting bloodthirsty coups
+d'etat. They wished to re-establish religious peace, and
+finally sent thousands of priests into imprisonment. They wished
+to repair the ruins which covered France, and only succeeded in
+adding to them.
+
+Thus there was always a complete contradiction between the
+individual wills of the men of the revolutionary period and the
+deeds of the Assemblies of which they were units.
+
+The truth is that they obeyed invisible forces of which they were
+not the masters. Believing that they acted in the name of pure
+reason, they were really subject to mystic, affective, and
+collective influences, incomprehensible to them, and which we are
+only to-day beginning to understand.
+
+
+Intelligence has progressed in the course of the ages, and has
+opened a marvellous outlook to man, although his character, the
+real foundation of his mind, and the sure motive of his actions,
+has scarcely changed. Overthrown one moment, it reappears the
+next. Human nature must be accepted as it is.
+
+The founders of the Revolution did not resign themselves to the
+facts of human nature. For the first time in the history
+of humanity they attempted to transform men and society in the
+name of reason.
+
+Never was any undertaking commenced with such chances of success.
+The theorists, who claimed to effect it, had a power in their
+hands greater than that of any despot.
+
+Yet, despite this power, despite the success of the armies,
+despite Draconian laws and repeated coups d'etat, the
+Revolution merely heaped ruin upon ruin, and ended in a
+dictatorship.
+
+Such an attempt was not useless, since experience is necessary to
+the education of the peoples. Without the Revolution it would
+have been difficult to prove that pure reason does not enable us
+to change human nature, and, consequently, that no society can be
+rebuilt by the will of legislators, however absolute their power.
+
+
+Commenced by the middle classes for their own profit, the
+Revolution speedily became a popular movement, and at the same
+time a struggle of the instinctive against the rational, a revolt
+against all the constraints which make civilisation out of
+barbarism. It was by relying on the principle of popular
+sovereignty that the reformers attempted to impose their
+doctrines. Guided by leaders, the people intervened incessantly
+in the deliberations of the Assemblies, and committed the most
+sanguinary acts of violence.
+
+The history of the multitudes during the Revolution is eminently
+instructive. It shows the error of the politicians who attribute
+all the virtues to the popular soul.
+
+The facts of the Revolution teach us, on the contrary, that a
+people freed from social constraints, the foundations of
+civilisation, and abandoned to its instinctive impulses, speedily
+relapses into its ancestral savagery. Every popular revolution
+which succeeds in triumphing is a temporary return to barbarism.
+If the Commune of 1871 had lasted, it would have repeated the
+Terror. Not having the power to kill so many people, it had to
+confine itself to burning the principal monuments of the capital.
+
+The Revolution represents the conflict of psychological forces
+liberated from the bonds whose function it is to restrain them.
+Popular instincts, Jacobin beliefs, ancestral influences,
+appetites, and passions unloosed, all these various influences
+engaged in a furious mutual conflict for the space of ten years,
+during which time they soaked France in blood and covered the
+land with ruins.
+
+Seen from a distance, this seems to be the whole upshot of the
+Revolution. There was nothing homogeneous about it. One must
+resort to analysis before one can understand and grasp the great
+drama and display the impulses which continually actuated its
+heroes. In normal times we are guided by the various forms of
+logic--rational, affective, collective, and mystic--which more or
+less perfectly balance one another. During seasons of upheaval
+they enter into conflict, and man is no longer himself.
+
+
+We have by no means undervalued in this work the importance of
+certain acquisitions of the Revolution in respect of the rights
+of the people. But with many other historians, we are
+forced to admit that the prize gained at the cost of such ruin
+and bloodshed would have been obtained at a later date without
+effort, by the mere progress of civilisation. For a few years
+gained, what a load of material disaster, what moral
+disintegration! We are still suffering as a result of the
+latter. These brutal pages in the book of history will take long
+to efface: they are not effaced as yet.
+
+Our young men of to-day seem to prefer action to thought.
+Disdaining the sterile dissertations of the philosophers, they
+take no interest in vain speculation concerning matters whose
+essential nature remains unknown.
+
+Action is certainly an excellent thing, and all real progress is
+a result of action, but it is only useful when properly directed.
+The men of the Revolution were assuredly men of action, yet the
+illusions which they accepted as guides led them to disaster.
+
+Action is always hurtful when, despising realities, it professes
+violently to change the course of events. One cannot experiment
+with society as with apparatus in a laboratory. Our political
+upheavals show us what such social errors may cost.
+
+Although the lesson of the Revolution was extremely categorical,
+many unpractical spirits, hallucinated by their dreams, are
+hoping to recommence it. Socialism, the modern synthesis of this
+hope, would be a regression to lower forms of evolution, for it
+would paralyse the greatest sources of our activity. By
+replacing individual initiative and responsibility by collective
+initiative and responsibility mankind would descend several steps
+on the scale of human values.
+
+The present time is hardly favourable to such experiments. While
+dreamers are pursuing their dreams, exciting appetites and the
+passions of the multitude, the peoples are every day arming
+themselves more powerfully. All feel that amid the universal
+competition of the present time there is no room for weak
+nations.
+
+In the centre of Europe a formidable military Power is increasing
+in strength, and aspiring to dominate the world, in order to find
+outlets for its goods, and for an increasing population, which it
+will soon be unable to nourish.
+
+If we continue to shatter our cohesion by intestine struggles,
+party rivalries, base religious persecutions, and laws which
+fetter industrial development, our part in the world will soon be
+over. We shall have to make room for peoples more solidly knit,
+who have been able to adapt themselves to natural necessities
+instead of pretending to turn back upon their course. The
+present does not repeat the past, and the details of history are
+full of unforeseen consequences; but in their main lines events
+are conditioned by eternal laws.
+
+
+
+INDEX
+
+Absolute monarchy, the
+Acceleration of forces of violence
+Administrations, real ruling forces
+Affective logic
+Affirmation, power of
+Alexander I of Russia
+Alsace loss of
+Ambition, as a motive of revolution
+Anarchy, followed by dictatorship; mental
+Ancestral soul
+Ancien regime, bases of the; inconveniences of; life under;
+dissolution of
+Ancients, Council of
+Anti-clerical laws
+Armies, of the Republic; character of; victories of; causes of
+success
+Army, role of, in revolution; in 1789
+Assemblies, the Revolutionary; psychology of; obedient to the
+clubs; see National, Constituent, Legislative Assemblies,
+Convention, &c.
+Assignats
+Augustine, St.
+Aulaud, M.
+Austria, revolution in; royalist illusions as to her attitude;
+attacks the Republic
+
+Balfour, Rt. Hon. A. J., on coal strike
+Barras
+Barrere
+Bartholomew, St., Massacre of; European rejoicing over
+Bastille, taking of the
+Battifol, M.
+Bayle, P.
+Beaulieu, Edict of
+Bedouin, executions at
+Belgium, invasion of
+Beliefs, affective and mystic origin of; intolerance of;
+justification of; intolerance greatest between allied beliefs;
+intolerance of democratic and socialistic beliefs
+Berquin, executed by Sorbonne
+Berry, Duchess de
+Billaud-Varenne
+Bismarck
+Blanc, Louis
+Blois, States of
+Bonaparte, see Napoleon
+Bonnal, General
+Bossuet
+Bourdeau, M.
+Bourgeoisie, their jealousy of the nobles causes the Revolution;
+their thirst for revenge; the real authors of the Revolution;
+philosophic ideas of
+Brazilian Revolution, the
+Britanny, revolt in
+Broglie, de
+Brumaire, coup d'etat of
+Brunswick, Duke of, his manifesto
+Buddhism
+Bureaucracy in France
+
+Caesar, on division amid the Gauls
+Caesarism
+Caesars follow anarchy and dominate mobs
+Cahiers, the
+Calvin; compared to Robespierre
+Carnot
+Carrier; crimes of, and trial
+Catechism of the Scottish Presbyterians
+Catherine de Medicis
+Catholic League
+Cavaignac, General
+Chalandon
+Champ-de-Mars, affair of the
+Charles IX
+Charles X
+China, revolution in
+Chinese labour
+Christian Revolution, the
+Christians, mutual hatred of
+Church, confiscation of goods of the
+Civil War
+Clemenceau, M.
+Clergy; civil constitution of
+Clubs, the, 24- psychology of the; obeyed by the Assemblies;
+closed; increasing power of the; see Jacobins
+Coalition, the
+Cochin, A.
+Colin, M.
+Collective ideas; collective logic
+Collot d'Herbois
+Commissaries of the Convention, psychology of
+Committees, the Governmental
+Commune of Paris, the; in insurrection; chief power in State;
+orders massacre of September; tyranny of
+Commune of 1871
+Communes, the revolutionary
+Comte, A.
+Concordat, the
+Condorcet
+Constituent Assembly, the; psychology of the; its fear of the
+people; temporarily resists the people; loses power; its last
+action
+Constitution of 1791; of 1793; of 1795; of the year VIII
+Constitutions, faith in
+Constraints, social, necessity of
+Consulate, the
+Contagion, mental; causes of; in crowds
+Contrat Social, the
+Convention, giants of the; inconsistency of; decimates itself;
+psychology of the; cowardice of; mental characteristics of;
+composition of; fear in the; besieged by the Commune; surrenders
+Girondists; Government of the; abolishes royalty; dissolved
+Council of State
+Couthon
+Criminal mentality
+Cromwell
+Crowd, Psychology of the
+Crowds in the French Revolution
+Cruppi, M.
+Cuba
+Cunisset-Carnot
+Currency, paper
+
+Danton
+Darwin, Charles
+Dausset, M.
+``Days,''of May 31; June 2; of June 20; of Aug. 10; of June 2; of
+Oct. 5
+Debidour, M.
+Declaration of Rights, the
+Democracy; intellectual and popular
+Departmental insurrections
+Desmoulins, Camille
+Dictatorship follows anarchy
+Diderot
+Directory, the, failure of; closes clubs; psychology of the;
+government of the; deportations under
+Discontent, result of
+Dreux-Breze
+Drinkmann, Baron
+Dubourg, Anne, burned
+Dumas, President of the Revolutionary Tribunal
+Dumouriez
+Durel
+
+Ego, analysis of the
+Elchingen, General
+Elizabeth, Empress of Russia
+Emigres, banished
+Empire, the Second
+Encyclopaedists, the
+England, coal strike in
+English Revolution; Constitution
+Enthusiasm
+Envy
+Equality
+Evolution
+
+Faguet, E.
+Fatalism, historians on
+Faubourgs, disarmed
+Fear
+Federation
+Ferrer, notes on anniversary of execution of
+Fersen
+Five Hundred, the
+Fontenelle
+France, kings of; artificial unity of
+Francis I
+Franco-Prussian war
+Fraternity
+Freethinkers, intolerance of
+French Revolution, the, revision of ideas concerning; generally
+misunderstood; a new religious movement; origins of; religions
+nature of; descends to lower classes; causes of; opinions of
+historians concerning; becomes a popular government; causes of
+democratisation; causes of the Revolution; a struggle of instinct
+against reason
+Fouche, at Lyons
+Fouquier-Tinville
+Freron
+
+Galileo
+German Emperors
+``Giants'' of the Convention; mediocrity of
+Gilbert-Liendon
+Girondists, the; late of the; surrendered by the Convention; vote
+for Louis' death
+Glosson, Professor, experiment in crowd psychology
+Governments, feeble resistance of, to revolution; best tactics to
+pursue; revolutions effected by
+Greek Revolution
+Gregoire
+Gregory XIII
+Guillotine, regeneration by
+Guiraud, M.
+Guise, Duke of
+Guizot
+
+Hamel, M.
+Hamilton, General
+Hanotaux, G.
+Hanriot
+Hatred, value of
+Haxo, General
+Hebert
+Hebertists
+Helvetius
+Henri II
+Henri III
+Henri IV
+Henry IV of Germany
+Henry VIII of England
+
+Historians, mistaken views of, re French Revolution; opinions of;
+concerning
+Hoche, General
+Holbach
+Holland, invasion of
+Hugo, Victor
+Huguenots, massacre of
+Humboldt
+Hunter's ancestral instinct of carnage
+
+Iena, explosion on board of
+Impartiality, impossibility of
+Incendiarism, of Commune of 1871
+Inequality, craving for
+Inquisition, the
+Islam
+Italy, revolution in
+
+Jacobinism; failure of; modern; its craze for reforms
+Jacobins, the; real protagonists of the Revolution; claim to
+reorganise France in name of pure reason; they rule France;
+results of their triumph; theories of; small numbers of; the
+clubs closed,; downfall of
+Jourdan, General
+
+La Bruyere
+La Fayette
+Lanessan, M.
+Langlois, General
+Latin mind, the
+Lavisse
+Lavoisier
+Leaders, popular, psychology of
+Lebon
+Lebrun, Mme. Vigee
+Legendary history
+Legislation, faith in
+Legislative Assembly, the psychology of; character of; timidity
+of
+Lettres de cachet
+Levy, General
+Liberte, the, explosion on board
+``Liberty, Equality, Fraternity''
+Lippomano
+Logics, different species of
+Louis XIII
+Louis XIV; poverty under
+Louis XVI; flight and capture; his chance; powers restored,; a
+prisoner;regarded as traitor; suspended; trial of;execution of, a
+blunder
+Louis XVII
+Louis XVIII
+Louis-Philippe
+Luther
+
+MacMahon, Marshal
+Madelin
+Mohammed
+Maistre, de
+Malesherbes
+Marat
+Marie Antoinette; influence of
+Marie Louise
+Massacres, during wars of religion; during the French Revolution;
+see September, Commissaries, &c.
+Mentalities prevalent in time of revolution
+Merlin
+Michelet
+Midi, revolt in the
+Mirabeau
+Monarch, position of, under the Reformation
+Monarchical feeling
+Montagnards
+Montesquieu
+Montluc
+Moors in Spain
+Mountain, the
+Mystic logic
+Mystic mentality
+
+Nantes, Edict of; revoked
+Nantes, massacres at
+Napoleon; in Russia; on fatalism; on the 5th of October; in
+Italy; in Egypt; returns; as Consul; reorganises France; defeated
+Napoleon III
+National Assembly, the
+National Guard
+Nature, return to, illusions respecting
+Necker
+Noailles, Comte de
+Nobles renounce privileges; emigrate
+
+October, ``days'' of
+Olivier, E.
+Opinions and Beliefs
+Oppede, Baron d'
+Orleans, Duc d'
+
+Paris, her share in the Revolution. See People
+Pasteur
+Peasants, condition of, before Revolution; burn chateaux
+People, the, in revolution; never directs itself; supposed part
+of; the reality; analysis of; the base populace; commences to
+terrorise the Assemblies; the sections rise
+Peoples, the Psychology of
+Persecution, religious
+Personality, transformation of, during revolution
+Peter the Great
+Petion
+Philip II
+Philippines
+Philosophers, influence of
+Plain, the
+Poissy, assembly of
+Poland, decadence of; revolution in; partition of
+Political beliefs
+Pope, the
+Portuguese Revolution
+Positivism
+Predestination
+Presbyterian Catechism
+Protestants, martyrs; persecute Catholics; exodus of; mentality
+ of
+Prussia, invades France
+Public safety, committee of
+
+Quinet
+
+Racial mind, stability of the
+Rambaud, M.
+Rational logic, seldom guides conduct; original motive in French
+Revolution
+Reason, Goddess of
+Reformation, the; rational poverty of doctrines
+Reforms, Jacobin craving for
+Religion, the French republic a form of
+Religion, wars of, the
+Repetition, value of
+Republic, the first; the second; the third
+Revision, necessity of
+Revolution of 1789; see French Revolution; of 1836; of 1848; of
+1870
+Revolutions, classification of; origin of; usual object of
+Revolutions, political; results of
+Revolutions, religious
+Revolutions, scientific
+Revolutionary army
+Revolutionary communes
+Revolutionary mentality
+Revolutionary municipalities
+Revolutionary tribunals
+Robespierre; compared to Calvin; High Pontiff; pontiff; reigns
+alone; sole master of the Convention; psychology of; his fall
+Rochelle
+Roland, Mme.
+Roman Empire
+Rossignol
+Rousseau
+Roussel, F.
+Russia
+Russian Revolution
+Russo-Japanese war
+
+Saint-Denis, destruction of tombs at
+Saint-Just
+Sedan
+September, massacres of
+Sieyes
+Social distinctions
+Socialism; hates the elect
+Sorel, A.
+Spain, revolution in
+States General
+Sulla
+Suspects, Law of
+Syndicalism
+
+Tacitus
+Taine; on Jacobinism; his work
+Taxes, pro-revolutionary
+Terror, the; motives of;psychology of; executions during;
+stupefying effect of; in the provinces; in the departments
+Thermidor, reaction of
+Thiebault, General
+Thiers; President
+Third Estate, jealousy of the
+Tocqueville
+
+Tolerance, impossible between opposed or related beliefs
+Togo, Admiral
+Toulon; fall of
+Tradition
+Tsushima
+Tuileries, attacked; Louis prisoner in; attacked by populace
+Turenne
+Turgot
+Turkey, revolution in
+
+United States
+Universal suffrage
+
+Valmy
+Vanity, cause of revolution
+Varennes, flight to
+Vasari
+Vendee, La
+Vergniaud
+Versailles, attack on
+Violence, causes of
+Voltaire
+
+Wendell, Barrett
+Williams, H.
+
+Young, Arthur
+
+
+
+
+End of The Project Gutenberg Etext of The Psychology of Revolution
+
diff --git a/448.zip b/448.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..adc5e45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/448.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d8a0386
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #448 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/448)