diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 19:06:46 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 19:06:46 -0700 |
| commit | 0aa65bbc3c30270680463d108c1be5f4ba40ff6b (patch) | |
| tree | accfe12da2411abb735b0a340bcdf3fcc8519641 | |
27 files changed, 7394 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/48589-0.txt b/48589-0.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..28f3e5e --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-0.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1306 @@ +*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 48589 *** + +[Illustration: Emil Edward Kusel] + + + Humanitarian + + Philosophy + + * * * * * + + By + + EMIL EDWARD KUSEL + + + Extracts From His Letters + + Fourth Edition + + * * * * * + + Thou shalt not kill.--Bible. + + The individuality created by God is not carnivorous.--Mary Baker G. Eddy. + + Kill not but have regard for life.--Buddha. + + * * * * * + + Los Angeles, California + 1912 + + + + + Copyright 1912 + + by Emil Edward Kusel. + + All rights reserved. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +NOTE. + + +When one meets with adversity and all the world seems bitterly against +him or when one realizes the short duration of life and hopes for a +splendid immortality, no doubt it is a consolation for many to read the +inspired and lofty sentiments of the Bible. + +Therefore in writing the following epigrams condemning inhumanity, I +felt confident that kindly people would see that it is far from my +motive to cast reflection upon any individual inclined to accept the +comforting and humane passages of either the Old or New Testament. + +I merely aimed to prove the inhuman Mosaical law giving man the idea to +kill is not a law of a kind and loving God. I also aimed to prove that +the flesh-eating religionist is an accessory to a crime more bestial in +the sight of God than any other sin known to the human family. + + EMIL E. KUSEL. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +KIND WORDS. + + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" has taught me that God and conscience are in +unison. I would have liked to condemn the writer for opening my eyes to +the truth, but the Lord is on his side. + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" is an eye opener for the true religionist who +never before thought on the wickedness of killing. + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" is a blessing for those who wish to live the +Christ life, although it will not appeal to the religionist who is +inhumanly self-righteous. + +Since digesting "Humanitarian Philosophy" I know a conscientious person +can read the stinging truth without a selfish protest. The truth is +mighty. + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" at first reading made me angry, but praise +God, the vegetarian's heart is in the right place. + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" is an inspiration. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +COMPLIMENTARY. + + +Have always been very much interested in the subjects of our able +ministers, but since receiving a copy of Mr. Kusel's philosophy against +flesh eating I am a convert to the doctrine that neither minister nor +congregation can be "a child of God" until they are vegetarians. + +It is impossible for me to now believe otherwise on account of the +tremendous cruelty and horror of taking the life of animals. + +I never thought of the truth as Mr. Kusel puts it forth, and I am +surprised to think preachers never preached against blood food. I also +thought it would be meet and proper to criticise shoe, glove and belt +wearing, but the leather using is a secondary proposition; the animal +is first killed for food purposes and secondarily to avoid the waste we +may utilize the hide, and still we should discourage that argument. + +Mr. Kusel is defending God Almighty nobly in his "Humanitarian +Philosophy" and has given the church doctrines a slap no man can +gainsay. + +When we favor meat eating we favor killing, and when we favor killing +in the name of God we know we are liars and murderers, for God is kind +and loving, and surely opposes the taking of life. Let churches preach +the murder of animals, but pray do not say wickedness (killing) is +God's will. The world needs more conscientious men like Mr. Kusel to +protect God Almighty from defamation. + + T. J. W. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +A NOBLE WOMAN. + + + Mr. Emil Edward Kusel, + + Los Angeles, Cal. + +Dear Mr. Kusel:--I have been wonderfully guided and blessed by reading +"Humanitarian Philosophy" as it is truly an inspired work that should +be thought upon by all religious people. + +The beauty of your blessed reasoning is that you cast all biblical +chaff to the four winds and look to God in the true light of love and +mercy. + +Yes indeed, you show the inconsistency of a religion that gives us +an evil right to kill things while every last one of us, without +exception, cling to life with the tenacity of a coward. + +You fully convince me that false prophets had a hand in writing the +Scriptures because God in His Infinite Love could not have created +the dear innocent lamb our Savior carried in his bosom to be killed +nor could he have created the sweet little baby calf to be slain +and eaten by human beings. You convince me that God is not in the +slaughter-house, neither in the midst of those who patronize the +butcher any more than He is in the heart of the wild beast of prey. + +I do believe in a personal God as I could not live without hope for a +blissful future life beyond the grave. This pilgrimage, to me, without +religion would make this world a very dreary and lonesome place. + +Heretofore I lived a carnivorous life, always wondering why God created +poor sentient things for human food but now, thank God, I realize, +without humanitarianism spirituality is not a reality and I applaud +such men as Mr. Kusel for standing out boldly on a grand philosophy +that puts all church doctrines to shame and presents a religion +consistent with reason. + +Your trend of thought, my dear brother, is indeed marvelous from a +gracious heart and I believe some mighty power is preparing you for a +special great work. + + Yours very truly, + + MRS. J. R. B. + + St. Paul, Minn., May 16, 1911. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +THE HERMIT. + + No flocks that roam the valley free, + To slaughter I condemn, + Taught by the power that pities me, + I learn to pity them. + + --Goldsmith. + + * * * * * + +In religion, what damned error but some sober brow will bless it and +approve it with a text, hiding the grossness with fair ornament. + + --Shakespeare. + + * * * * * + +The untold suffering the human family sanctions through a wrong +conception of what is right, should make every Christian heart ache. + + --Platt. + + * * * * * + +When men go hunting (to kill) they call it sport but when the hunted +animal (perhaps wounded) turns to fight for its life, they call _that_ +ferocity.--Shaw. + + * * * * * + +Let all creatures live, as we desire to live. + + --Tolstoy. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +THE RELIGION OF BUDDHA. + +(An Idea from "Light of Asia.") + + 'Twere good to be humane + to the helpless beast; + Better than to deplore the + sins of the world + With priests who pray for + mankind, + And yet have no mercy + on God's dumb creatures-- + "They pray for mercy + Whilst they themselves + are merciless." + + --Kusel. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +Humanitarian Philosophy + +By Emil Edward Kusel + +No doubt some of the conscience-stricken readers will brand the +author of the sentiments herein as an extremist rather than a humane +enthusiast, but bethink yourself it is far better to be "an extremist" +on a logical, noble basis than to be inconsistent under false pretense. + + * * * * * + +The author is presenting truths from an absolutely rational standpoint +standing firmly on a real philosophical basis that cannot be overthrown +by a cyclone of protests from the "religious" flesh-eating faction. + +The idea is to show that man, when he gets "right with God," drifts +away from the customs of ancient times and reasons from the Golden +Rule foundation which is consistent with a higher life and makes him +religiously humane as well as "pious." + + * * * * * + +You may allow your quasi-religious principle to prevail against reason; +you may pout and cry against the Humanitarian's noble philosophy; you +may dream of the imps of hell awaiting his quietus; you may consult +your Bible to bless your inhumanity and yet mercy for our dumb +fellow-creatures is unselfish, pure and gentle, resultant from a proper +conception of man's superiority and his God. + +If a man's religion is pure and good and undefiled it would be wrong +to present facts to blast his belief (be it ever so superstitious); +however, when he insists upon inhumanity toward any sentient creature, +he should be severely criticised. + + * * * * * + +The scriptural passages that are well flavored with indecency and the +scriptural inhumanity written in God's name are not one whit more +inspired than are the objectionable lines of sensational literature. + + * * * * * + +The Bible has caused more bloodshed, more hatred; made more hypocrites +and caused more suffering than all else combined. It is a book +containing some lofty ideas and moral laws by good men, but the +many inconsistencies therein have caused superstition, imagination, +insanity, contemptibility and horrible cruelty that haunts the brain of +the honorable thinking masses. + + * * * * * + +It is proper to impress indelibly in the minds of the pretenders of the +several creeds "Thou shalt not kill;" neither shalt thou be accessory +in the killing by encouraging the slaughter through patronage. + +You may erect your massive temples and dedicate them to Jehovah; you +may pray to your heart's content and sing psalms until doomsday, yet +the earthquake, the cyclone, the tornado, the volcano overthrows the +synagogue, the cathedral, the church, the brothel and the saloon +without distinction. Evidently the god of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is +not omnipresent to protect an institution that stands for inhumanity. + + * * * * * + +One of the most noticeable inconsistencies ever presented to thinking +people is the representation of "Divine Love" portrayed under the title +"Peace," symbolized by a child leading the cow, the calf, the lion, +the leopard and the lamb. This taken from the Bible, is supposed to +represent, "And a little child shall lead them." + +Just think of symbolizing "Peace" with an innocent child leading +animals we actually murder! No doubt every religionist looks upon that +painting as a masterpiece--an inspiration. Yet most of them sanction +the slaughter of innocence by relishing a lamb chop or a veal cutlet. + +"And a little child shall lead them!" Whither? To the slaughter? Is not +that a miserable symbolization of "Divine Love" and "Peace?" + +Such inconsistency painted in the name of religion is an abomination +and deserves strenuous criticism. + +Not the least in the realm of inconsistency are the Jewish people who +fast on their day of atonement and break the Sabbath fifty-two times a +year by bartering. Now where is the consistency in such an atonement +when the Bible says explicitly: "Remember the Sabbath day and keep it +holy." + +Such incongruity is practised universally among the orthodox as well +as the reformed element. Like the Gentile, the Jewish religionist, +notwithstanding that he admits the horror of viewing the death throes +of a butchered animal, eats his flesh food "kosher" to satisfy his +palate rather than live up to the promptings of conscience. + + * * * * * + +Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism, and Christian Sciencism alike +disregard the sacredness of all animal kingdom, and yet, after +admitting the horror of the slaughter pen, they all encourage the +merciless killing under the cloak of the Bible. + + * * * * * + +"The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose" may well be applied to +the religionist who upholds the killing of our dumb fellow creatures. + + * * * * * + +The fact that the Bible encourages the murder of an animal proves it is +not entirely from the pen of holy men. + +The individual who professes religion and says it is right to slay and +eat when he can live without taking sentient life, on the vegetation +which nature so bountifully provides, is a liar, a murderer and a +hypocrite in his own higher conscience. + + * * * * * + +The so-called devout man wants to live and enjoy life, but he eats of +the innocent animal that has been battered to death by the blow of +the ax; he contends that a body which suffers pain was created for +slaughter to satisfy his beastly palate. Such a man is destitute of the +very essence of God-life be he minister, church-goer or layman. + + * * * * * + +Above all things the minister of the Gospel and the church attendant +should be kind and considerate toward all animal creation and should +construe the Scriptures and preach to prove the sacredness of +their Holy Bible. They should do God's will one earth as it is in +Heaven, absolutely abstaining from the fleshpots of Egypt, thereby +discouraging the blotting out of animal life, proving conclusively by +their lives that their God is just and kind and merciful. + + * * * * * + +The man who opposes the spilling of life blood of Nature's creatures is +on the higher plane of life. + +After searching for a mode of living through which we might find +perfect peace on earth and good will toward our fellow-men, we become +partially interested in the different religions, but we cannot +conscientiously close our eyes and believe a meat-eating, gormandizing +religionist is undefiled and passing on to spiritual perfection to +ultimately, at dissolution, burst into a glorious immortality. + + * * * * * + +Read the memorable Sermon on the Mount, supposed to have been delivered +by Christ Jesus, and note the humility, the tenderness, the love and +all therein that is grand and noble--then decide that such a meek +and lowly Nazarene could have eaten of the fleshpots or even have +sanctioned the killing of any living creature, and you deprive that +character of the very essence of divinity. + + * * * * * + +Flesh eating man's religion cannot emanate from a kindly heart because +with all his intellectuality and knowledge of right and wrong, his +animalistic tendencies are in excess. His horror for the slaughter pen +is conclusive and positive evidence that the higher consciousness is +dormant proving that carnivorous man hath no pre-eminence above the +beast. + +We fail to see any Christianity in the present-day Sunday churchianity, +and we positively know there is nothing sacred in the person upholding +the merciless slaughter of animals. Through all this we are made to +fully realize the inconsistency of nearly all religious professions. +We finally study the Laws of Nature, and we live from that time on +according to the dictates of conscience and reason, with some little +faith in addition. The first thought that impresses us is the inhuman +custom of taking life blood, knowing that every man, woman and child, +who possesses an atom of feeling, would shudder to look upon the +butchery of our dumb fellow-creatures, and we know if the horror of the +slaughter pen is admitted, it surely is a heinous crime to slaughter. +Then we begin to delve deep into the real scientific subjects of +real scientific men and really discover the real body builders are +proper food, proper mastication, proper air and proper breathing, and +occasional proper fasting, etc. We live the life as recommended by +these noble logicians and benefactors. Now we look from the heights +to the vast expanse of empty faith cure, cults and isms, creeds and +dogmas, and theories, and realize how narrow they all are by not +embodying humanitarianism and the laws of health and hygiene in their +teachings. + + * * * * * + +From a spiritual conception, it is just as reasonable to recommend +human cannibalism as the eating of butcher shop carrion. + +The 25th day of December is the day set aside to present gifts to our +sweethearts, wives and friends; the day Santa Claus brings toys to our +little ones to overflow their little hearts with gladness, but mainly +to commemorate the birth of one of the kindliest characters the world +has ever known. + +That holy day is horribly desecrated by the quasi-pious element +throughout our Christian land in the killing of countless numbers of +Nature's sentient creation. + +Thanksgiving Day, likewise set aside for a sacred purpose--to thank +God for the many blessings bestowed upon our great nation--is also +desecrated by religious people as well as by the laity. On the day we +should send our thanks to that invisible something (The First Great +Cause) we praise an imaginary personal deity by killing things to +satiate the craving of the palate. + + * * * * * + +The Bible condemns the eating of swine flesh (Deut. 14: 8; Is. 65: 4), +but what care the pharisee so long as he intends pleasing the palate +rather than obey the law of his God and conscience? + + * * * * * + +When we reach the Holy Mountain (consistent religion) we will abstain +from eating flesh food and have a heartfelt desire for all creatures to +live and enjoy life as we wish to live (Golden Rule.) + +Selfish civilized intellectual human takes his gun and repairs to the +forest and wantonly slaughters wild game. Perhaps he kills outright; +perhaps he wounds; perhaps the animal he has wounded is dying a slow, +painful death; perhaps he wounds or kills a mother and the young are +starving in nest or lair, and perhaps a professed Jew, Catholic, +Protestant or Christian Scientist is relishing the seasoned carrion +while the little ones are dying for the want of that mother's care. God +forbid the belief in such a god! + + * * * * * + +The huntsman, who wounds the wild game, goes to his couch and rests +peacefully while the poor dumb, wounded animal is dying in the forest, +suffering most excruciating pain. + +The deer, the dove, the quail and all of Nature's blood creation must +suffer with horrifying wounds at the hands of the thoughtless, cruel +hunter; upheld by so-called religious people who contend that such +inhumanity is permissible in God's sight. + +This very day thousands upon thousands of our dumb fellow-creatures +are suffering agonizing deaths caused through wounds inflicted by the +merciless hunter; and thousands upon thousands of professed Jews, +Catholics, Protestants and Christian Scientists worship the god that +tolerates such cruelty. Hypocrisy! Inconsistency! Shame! + +Sift mankind down to his noblest thought, and he must admit the life of +an animal is just as sacred as his own. + + * * * * * + +Knowing that all humanity feels the horrors of taking the life blood +of defenseless animals, you are compelled to condemn every religious +institution that does not embody within its creed the vegetarian diet. + + * * * * * + +Animals instinctively flee from danger, and suffer pain, which proves +the brute creation has a right to an appointed time upon the earth. +When man slaughters these helpless creatures under the selfish idea +that they were created for that purpose, he is destitute of divine +principle. + + * * * * * + +The almighty dollar is the god of the civilized people--mankind takes +the sacred life blood of God's creatures and barters the carcass in +exchange for money. Nearly all clergymen and the laity eat of the +murdered animal. Shame! + + * * * * * + +Let us be at least considerate and reason on the side of mercy. If your +religion sanctions the killing of innocent animals, well then, in the +name of all that is pure and good, lay aside your religion and get your +soul in tune with the Infinite, and then use your faculties of reason +to develop up to the highest ideal. + +Condemn the killing of innocent, defenseless animals, and do away with +the fleshpots of Egypt, and praise Deity for endowing you with reason +sufficient to realize the wrong of shedding life blood, and then sing +hosannas for the nobility of living according to the promptings of +higher conscience. + + * * * * * + +Do not think of the savory beef and mutton as it hangs in the market +place, but turn your mind and heart to the abattoirs and see the horror +of slaughter and then acknowledge that if God is not in the slaughter +house to hinder the killing of a dumb brute he is surely not in the +churches reserving crowns and halos for a sanctimonious element whose +palate takes precedence of principle. + + * * * * * + +The church folk encourage the killing of quadruped, fish and fowl and +then have the audacity to say grace at meal time, thanking God and +imploring Him to shower blessings upon them. + + * * * * * + +You believe in all that elevates man to the highest standard of +excellence and yet in the eating of a slaughtered animal you are an +accessory to the crime of murder--a crime that is far more morally +wrong and horrible than any so-called venial sin. + +The man who "believes" and has "faith" solely for his soul's safety +through fear rather than through love; the man who affiliates with +the church with mercenary motive; the man who testifies with lying +tongue to the virtue of his carnivorous unfeeling religion; the man who +shifts the blame of his cussedness to the mythical Satan; the man who +is weak and bent toward religious emotionalism; the man who sees the +mote in every eye but his own; the man who stands on the street corner +preaching hell and damnation, "fighting the devil," are the sorts of +men who decry that all beings have an equal right to live. + + * * * * * + +If perchance a fellow human becomes tired and weary of the vicissitudes +of this world and cancels his own captivity (suicide), we frantically +throw up our hands realizing the enormity of such a crime. + +His life is his own and he may do as he pleases; his sin of +self-destruction is between himself and his God, and yet we grieve +at such a sad exit. The very same man who shudders at the uncanny +thought of another's self-murder will uphold the killing of a dumb +brute to satiate the "human" palate. The animal does not want to die +yet the intelligent man who has a "merciful loving God" makes murder +permissible taking his authority from the book he calls "The Sacred +Bible." + +The Proverbs, the Psalms, the Sermon on the Mount, and many other +portions of the Good Book are beautiful, and no doubt the writers of +the select passages were inspired, but the evil spirit was surely +predominant in the man who depicted the Prince of Peace, in all his +humility, as a flesh eater. + + * * * * * + +A pitiful story to be told about a little girl whose father was +supposed to be very devout, and in whose residence the motto, + + "GODI S NOW HERE I NOUR HOME" + +adorned the wall, confusedly printed by her illiterate parent. + +One beautiful day, as all nature seemed in perfect harmony, the child +strolled to the barnyard where the hired man was killing the petted +calf preparatory to having a great feast in honor of the son, returning +from a western college of theology. + +A thought struck the child as she saw the life blood of an innocent +animal ebbing away, through a horrible knife wound. + +She hastened back to her father's home, sad but wiser, and +appropriately divided the motto on the wall: + + GOD IS NO WHERE IN OUR HOME. + +or as Daniel interpreted King Belshazzar's dream, the thinking child +weighed her papa in the balances and found him very much wanting in God +principle. + +Many so-called pious people throughout the land condemn theaters, +dancing, sociable drinking, prize-fighting, card playing, pastime +smoking, Sunday recreation, the innocent custom of Santa Claus and +the comic supplements of our Sunday newspapers, yet none of these +pleasures and pastimes could be half so abominable and sinful as the +encouragement of slaughter. + + * * * * * + +Every church member construes the Scriptures to please his own +individuality; sometimes he construes literally but when the passage +does not coincide with his appetite or manner of living he invariably +finds a figurative meaning. + + * * * * * + +We justify almost any sort of life by the Holy Bible, but we cannot +pull the blinds over the eyes of conscience. + + * * * * * + +The Women's Christian Temperance Union cannot influence towards +reformation effectively; the women of this religious order are trying +to defeat liquor and cigarette traffic, yet loth to realize under their +profession of Christianity, they are sinners greater than either the +unfortunate cigarette fiend or the drunkard, because they all admit +the horror of killing, at the same time relishing a mess of carrion, +thereby virtually encouraging the killer to kill more. + +The tiger pounces upon the giraffe and rides it to death, all the while +tearing the flesh from the bleeding animal; the puma pounces upon the +mountain goat; the hyena tears the entrails from its living prey and +the cat pounces upon the beautiful song bird and takes its innocent +life--where is your merciful, loving, personal God? + + * * * * * + +The religionist who lives on hallucination or believes that faith alone +"is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not +seen," and will not reason, is living in the dark ages still. + + * * * * * + +If one desires going into absolute truth concerning the killing of +helpless animals, he may justly condemn the wearing of leather shoes, +gloves, etc., all of which are worn contrary to Nature's Law. + + * * * * * + +The self-styled religious element send missionaries to foreign lands to +spread the gospel of love when they, themselves, as well as those they +send, are insufficiently human to recognize the brutality of slaughter. + + * * * * * + +Take man to the slaughter house to view the butchery, and then if he +contends God created helpless, dumb brutes for the slaughter pen, he is +positively heartless. If he shudders to witness the hideous butchery, +that proves conclusively that God is not omnipresent. + +If man wishes to disregard spirituality and remain an agnostic, infidel +or an atheist, that is his privilege and he may continue eating carrion +and encouraging slaughter, from the lower animal plane, but when he +steps over the threshold into religion and affiliates with the churches +and talks of man's pre-eminence above the beast he must of necessity +be in sympathy with his dumb fellow creatures and abstain from +flesh-eating to discourage all things not in harmony with God. (Higher +self). + + * * * * * + +Does it not hurt the innocent lamb when you cut its little throat? Does +it not hurt the little calf when you take its tender life? Does it not +hurt the cow when you wield the axe with tremendous force against its +forehead? Does it not hurt the sheep when in the agonies of death? Does +it not hurt when the goat pitifully gurgles the sound "Oh Lord," as its +life-blood is passing the butcher's knife? If pain does attend this +horrible inhumanity of man, what right then has he to establish for +himself a God in Heaven when in reality he hath no more feeling in his +miserable carcass than hath the cannibal of the uncivilized isles. + + * * * * * + +All things may be possible to God, but the idea of placing the breath +of life into our fellow-beings to be snuffed out by a superior +intellectual animal is the absurdest of all absurdities. + +Dancing, theater-going, rag-time music, and all other pleasures to +kill the monotony of daily routine, are under the ban of the churches. +We carry ourselves aloof from these awful (?) sins and walk in the +attitude of solemnity to impress Almighty God with our piety. We preach +against liquor and tobacco while we ourselves are addicted to the use +of tea and coffee (stimulants). We condemn everything we ourselves do +not care for and we jealously admonish others to be just like us. Now +if dancing, theater-going, rag-time music, etc., and the immoralities +of life are sins of venial proportion, of what colossal magnitude +must be the sin of taking life we cannot restore and how immeasurably +hellish are the churches that uphold the killing in the name of a +merciful God! + + * * * * * + +The dumb animals were created by Nature same as man (except that we +are a little above the animal in intellect), and have a divine right +to live out their respective allotted time same as man (minister, +church-goer or layman.) + + * * * * * + +The Buddhist who regards all animal life sacred is on the right path to +spirituality, while the carnivorous Jew, Catholic and Protestant are +drifting in the rut of dark age fantasy and fanaticism. + + + + +QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS + + +Q. Are you not a little bit radical on the subject of Humanitarianism? + +A. To you I may be "a little bit radical" because I oppose all +religions (yours inclusive) which make mankind selfish and unfeeling. + +Q. If the Bible teaches me to slay and eat have I not a right to eat +flesh? + +A. Yes, a legal right and your Bible right, but not a moral right. + +Q. Do not some people believe it is right to slay and eat lower animals? + +A. Yes, from their palate, but all honorable conscientious men see a +wrong in taking life. + +Q. Has not environment throughout one's life something to do with our +eating of flesh? + +A. Yes, but come out of it and be in line with a grander, nobler and +consistent life. Lay aside your palate and let your conscience rule. + +Q. Is not the devil in your philosophy? + +A. It seems so to you because it is an exposé of churchianity, proving +beyond question the nothingness of the flesh eating religionist's piety. + +Q. Suppose man lives in a country where he cannot find vegetarian food? + +A. Then he might be justified in eating flesh to preserve his life. + +Q. If there is no personal God, who created this world? + +A. It is a scientific proposition, and so acknowledged by all thinking +men. + +Q. Do church people get angry at your philosophy? + +A. Yes, sometimes, as when their conscience is seared by a hot iron. + +Q. Have not vegetables life? + +A. Not life which suffers an evident pain nor do they flee when you +threaten to pluck them. Such a question is invariably asked by a +carnivorous wiseacre. + +Q. Why are all Vegetarians lank, lean and skinny? + +A. Because you like the taste of meat and intend to continue eating it. + +Q. I know animals have fear and pain, but supposing God did place them +on earth for man to slay and eat, what then? + +A. "God" is no better then than your "devil." + +Q. What were animals created for? + +A. What were YOU created for? + +Q. What is your conception of God? + +A. Nature. Higher self--Conscience. + +Q. Do you not kill insects when you drink water; and do you not cripple +and trample harmless bugs to death with every step you take? + +A. Yes, but involuntarily and not with pre-meditation and not selfishly +to satisfy an inhuman desire or appetite. + +Q. Would you "swat" a fly or kill a flea or a snake? + +A. If a pest or venomous reptile disturbed my peace and quiet I would +be justified in protecting myself. + +Q. Is not the survival of the fittest a natural law; consequently being +superior I may slay and eat? + +A. That's your idea because the "fittest" is yourself--in your own +estimation and power; but there's no godliness in such a contention. +It is your selfish conclusion that might is right at the expense of +sentient life. + +Q. Do I not work hard and do I not know that I need meat to sustain me +in my manual labor? Do I not know what my system needs. + +A. Your system does not require food which must come from a murdered +animal! When you contend that you must subsist on flesh, you know not +whereof you speak. You are talking to uphold your inhuman appetite. + +Q. Where would medical research be were it not for vivisection +(torture) and killing animals for experiment in the interest of science? + +A. I do not know, but I do know scientific men have not a moral right +to torture and kill harmless, helpless animals. Experimenting in +surgery, etc., should be done on humans who believe in the advancement +of medical science at the expense of life. + +Q. Do you object to the infidel eating flesh food? + +A. I do not object to anyone eating flesh food--eat whatever you like, +but I do point out the wrong of taking life and I emphatically say the +religious institution upholding slaughter is a farce and a pharisaical +monument to a man-made deity. + +Q. Do you actually consider flesh eating the most abominable of sins? + +A. Yes, absolutely the most abominable. + +Q. What do you think of religious emotionalism and ecstasy? + +A. If from the mouth of a carnivorous worshipper it is sham and +pretense--a mockery. + +Q. Is not your feeling toward animals mawkish sentimentality? + +A. There is no such thing as mawkish sentimentality in decrying +inhumanity. + +Q. Do not the lower animals prey upon one another, and do not the big +fish eat the little fish? + +A. You profess to be above the inferior animals and you profess to have +a soul; you also have a Golden Rule supposed to have been handed down +by a kind and merciful Creator. + +Q. What shall we do with all the animals if we do not kill them? + +A. Is that why you eat flesh? + +Q. Do you really think carnivorous churchites are not of God? + +A. I don't _think_ it, I _know_ it _absolutely_, because I know it +is wrong to kill and I know they know it and I know they search the +Scriptures for "proof" to satisfy palate while Conscience rebels. + +Q. What do you think of a religionist who says, "I am living under a +new dispensation since Christ came and went, and I now eat anything the +Lord sets before me?" + +A. If he means he can eat at the expense of sentient life he is not a +Godly man; he is not living in harmony with the Golden Rule; he is not +living according to the promptings of a higher self, consequently the +God spirit is dormant. + +The church carnivora's favorite Bible quotations to justify his +inhumanity are invariably quoted from a petrified conscience and the +region of the palate. Here are several of the passages: + + "There is nothing from without a man, entering into him can defile + him; but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile + the man." + + * * * * * + + "For one believeth that he may eat all things; another, who is weak, + eateth herbs. But to him that esteemeth anything to be unclean to him + it is unclean." + + * * * * * + + "Now the spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some + shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and + doctrines of devils. Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their + conscience seared with a hot iron; commanding to abstain from meats, + which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them, which + believe and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and + nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving; for it is + sanctified by the word of God and prayer." + + * * * * * + + "In a trance I saw a vision; a certain vessel descend as it had been + a great sheet let down from heaven by four corners. I considered and + saw four-footed beasts of the earth and beasts and creeping things and + fowls of the air; and a voice said unto me, Arise, Peter, slay and + eat." + + + + +IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES + + +The Bible says: Be not among eaters of flesh. + +The Bible says: It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise than to +hear the hymns of fools. + +The Bible says: If an animal dieth of itself do not eat it but give it +to thy neighbor and let him eat thereof. + +The Bible says: Who knoweth that the spirit of man goeth upward and the +spirit of the beast goeth downward? + +The Bible says: Your stomachs are an open sepulchre. + +The Bible says: Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy. + +The Bible says: Prove all things and hold fast of that which is good. + +The Bible says: Do not be as the hypocrites are, testifying in public +places and yet living apart from God. + +The Bible says: Reason is too high for a fool. + +The Bible says: He that follows after mercy findeth life. + +The Bible says: The wise man's eyes are in his head (he reasons), but +the fool's eyes are neither here nor there, he walketh in darkness. + +The Bible says: When a man's ways are in harmony with higher +consciousness he maketh his enemies be at peace with him. + +The Bible says: The Spirit of God made Samson a murderer. + +The Bible says: The beasts of the field shall honor me. + +The Bible says: Fool thou art to believe all that the prophets have +said. + +The Bible says: God sent plagues to torment his people. + +The Bible says: Shed not innocent blood. + +The Bible says: Praise the Lord every living creature--the beasts of +the field, the birds of the air and earth, the fish of the waters and +all mankind. + +The Bible says: Thy will be done on earth as it is in Heaven. + +The Bible says: Thou art weighed in the balances and art found wanting. + +The Bible says: There are many false lords and false gods the people +are worshipping. + +The Bible says: Come now, let us reason together. + +The Bible says: Faith without works is dead. + +The Bible says: He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a human. + +The Bible says: Beast and man have one breath; so that man hath no +pre-eminence above the beast; as one dieth so dieth the other. + +The Bible says: Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter for thy +heart is not right in the sight of God. + +The Bible says: Every moving thing that liveth (grain, fruits, +vegetables, nuts, etc.) shall be food for you, but flesh with the life +thereof which is blood shall ye not eat. + +The Bible says: God blessed every creature. + +The Bible says: Behold I have given you every herb bearing seed, which +is upon the face of the earth and every tree, on the which is the fruit +of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for food. + +The Bible says: All that cry Lord, Lord, are not of God. + +The Bible says: They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my Holy Mountain. + +The Bible says: I am God, I change not. + +The Bible says: Do a little consistent heart cleaning so that the human +mind's eye shall be spiritual to see and segregate right from wrong. + +The Bible says: Christ taught love, leniency, forgiveness, tenderness +and mercy. + +The Bible says: Dead flies cause the apothecary's ointment to send +forth a stinking savour. + +Capital punishment or legalized murder is another miscarriage of +consistency; it does not dovetail into mercy and it does not blend into +the law that God has given man an allotted time upon the earth. What +right have twelve jurors to virtually cancel the life of a murderer? +Incarcerate the offender under a life sentence with proper food and +training, and ultimately that murderer's heart and soul might be purer +than Judge, jurors and all connected with the courts of justice. + + * * * * * + +If a criminal under excitement or cool pre-meditation takes the life +of a human being, the cool, considerate jurors, responsible for the +death penalty, are just as guilty of murder as the prisoner. + + * * * * * + +The butcher is rejected as a juror on a murder trial on the ground that +his business has hardened his heart, and yet the Judge of the Superior +Court, the sheriff and his deputies and the eligible jurors all eat of +the beef the butcher slaughters. + + * * * * * + +Despite the protests that may come to the surface in reading the +inspired, pointed truths, the fact should be reiterated that Justice, +Kindness and Mercy for every living creature is in the heart and soul +of the true religionist. + +The sand-blind carnivorous faith curist (who reads his Bible through +a pair of eye-glasses not made by God Almighty) tells us of a divine +healing power. + +We hear many testimonies from the lips of these people praising this +wonderful (?) curative agency, but when sensibly considered we know the +"power" removes only visionary ills. + +Imaginary tumors, etc., hypochondria and other nervous troubles readily +yield to this mythical physician, but no disease or defect in reality, +can be removed until we remove the physical cause. + +If we continue living regardless of natural health laws all the +"belief" and all the "faith" and all the "Blood" cannot offset the +inevitable result of continued disobedience. + +They sometimes speculate as to the stubbornness and apparent +incurability of an ailment and finally lay the blame to a spiritual +insufficiency. Ridiculous! + + * * * * * + +Mankind is filled with patriotism when a victorious war is ended, +forgetting the awful gloom pervading some poor mother's home. The +higher self should make us grieve with those that grieve rather than +be exultant at the loss or downfall of any nation. We should love all +nations and nationalities as we do our own, and be bound together by +inseparable bonds, realizing that we all must pass to the final tomb of +man on the same level. + +A bow of horse hair coming in contact with the gut strings of a violin +produces exquisite harmony that thrills every fibre of our being with +ecstasy. We can attribute the melody to the spirit of the deceased +animal appealing to the human heart. Strange that after life has +departed we can charm the muses with tones produced on a stringed +instrument. What human being has ever bequeathed to the world a +substance to awaken the emotions of our soul through concord of sweet +sounds like unto the gut of a deceased animal? Evidently there is more +harmony in the entrails of lower creatures than we find in the entire +carcass of religious civilized carnivorous man. + + * * * * * + +The scientist who upholds painful experimental surgery in the interest +of science should give over his own body for experiment instead of +encouraging the cruelties of vivisection. It hurts being "cut to +pieces," consequently the heartless scientific fellow, instead of +offering his own body for the dissecting table, tortures a poor +friendless dog or other animal. + +The horrible suffering thousands of helpless creatures have undergone +through the process of vivisection is heartrending. + +There should be stringent law against such inhumanity. + + + + +A DEVOUT (?) ADMONITION. + + + E. E. Kusel, + + Los Angeles, Cal. + +Sir: I read your "Humanitarian Philosophy" booklet and I take it as a +mass of devil talk. It is not in favor of the Holy Bible and it says it +is wrong to kill animals. This is crossing God's word. You say it says +swine meat is forbidden. That is the only true statement in your book +but that is the law for the Jews only. You say it says thou shalt not +kill; of course it does, and that has references to the human family +only. You say the religious man that does not shudder at the works of +a butcher is heartless and godless. You tell a falsehood there. I have +been a believer fifteen years and I know all animals were made for man. + +I can see the devil has a powerful influence over you as it had over +Voltaire, Paine, Ingersoll, Edison, Hubbard and other non-believers. +You infidels preach against God's Bible and will be burned in the +everlasting fires of hell for it. You will be glad to have a drop of +cold water in your suffering, but god will not have mercy--it will be +too late then. + +Hell is full of agnostics and infidels and non-believers burning and +suffering and I warn you to have a care as to what you say. + +The Catholics and Christian Scientists are as much of the devil's +doings as you are, so you'll have company if you do not repent of your +infidelity. + +You are adding to God's word and it is punishable by his wrath (Rev. +22:18.) + +Your book is a lot of lies and infidelity. + + N. S. W. + + Birmingham, Ala., Jan. 30, 1911. + + + + +A REPLY. + + + Mr. N. S. W., + + Birmingham, Ala. + +My dear sir: In reply to your letter of Jan. 30th, concerning my +"Humanitarian Philosophy," I wish to candidly tell you that I am not at +all afraid of your sort of god. The God I worship is not very likely +to materialize in a selfish fanatical subject, but always comes to the +surface in the heart and soul of honorable, conscientious thinking +men--men who either profess nothing and live according to custom or +in men who profess religion and uphold their God as kind, loving and +merciful. + +This latter man is an ethical vegetarian and will not accept the +cruelties and inconsistencies of the Bible but says "it is an error in +translation." + +As to the lower animals, one preying upon the other, the conscientious, +devout Bible believer presents the theory of his own freeing God +Almighty from the sinful responsibility. He divides Bible truth from +Bible error--he accepts the lofty and beautiful and holds fast to that +which is good. + +If you intend to preach a gospel of Love you will find it an utter +impossibility to do so if you do not live a Humanitarian life--a life +that forbids the killing of any thing that suffers pain, and fear of +death as you yourself may sometimes suffer. + +In conclusion I wish to impress you with the fact that your letter is +sufficient proof that you read the Bible in a haphazard style and know +not its contents. + +Every assertion, every quotation and every conclusion in my +"Humanitarian Philosophy," my dear sir, is absolutely true and +justified. + + Respectfully, + + E. E. KUSEL. + + + + +FROM THE W. A. T. L. + + +The tobacco smoking on street cars has been very much discussed in +your valuable paper recently. Now, I will suggest that all persons +who object to the poisonous effects of tobacco register a protest +every chance they get and spend some good money, as I am doing, to +back up their argument against the most deadly plant used by human +beings. There is no traffic so degrading in its influence and effect as +tobacco. It goes hand in hand with liquor, and when we stop the youth +of the land from using the weed, then the saloon will have no customers. + + G. L. R. + + Founder World's Anti-Tobacco League, + Los Angeles, Cal. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + + + + +THE "WORST" SIN. + + +The church element construe the Bible to blend into their own desires +and appetites and then in the name of their god (little g) they commit +every iniquity under the sun, the most abominable of which is the +eating of "a beef which has been battered in the head by the blow of an +ax or mutton which has had its throat cut from ear to ear." + +Get yourself in touch with the Infinite and you will see that the +taking of animal life for food is a greater sin than smoking, drinking +or satisfying animal desires. The three last named are only sinning +against the body but not commendable by any means, while the first is +the horrible sin of taking life. + +Carnivorous reader (church people included) think these lines over well +and then move thy tongue seven times before thou speakest of sin! + + E. E. KUSEL. + + Los Angeles, Cal. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + + + + +MAN AND BEAST. + + +What queer and wild notions religious faddists get into their heads. T. +J. W. wants us to quit killing cattle and hogs, etc., in fact all kinds +of animals and birds because God has put them on earth. I would like Mr +W. to tell us what would become of us if we followed his advice. Why, +the animals would crowd man off the earth in a short while. The farmer +could not raise any crops. Cattle, deer, hares and sheep would eat his +grain, the coyotes his chickens and the lions would eat him. + + C. V. Pasadena, Cal. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + + + + +VEGETARIAN'S REPLY. + + +If you please, Mr. V., I am not a "religious faddist." I am not +religious at all. I am a firm believer in the Golden Rule, applying it +to man and beast. + +In reply to your query, Mr. V. I will answer briefly: Self-preservation +is the first law of nature, so protect yourself against the presumed +invasion of tame and wild beasts, birds, etc., but do not presume we +have the right to take life of anything which endures pain or runs away +from impending danger unless occasion calls for it. + +My letter to the Herald, if you please, was for those who profess to be +godly and "in the kingdom." Religious people must be strictly humane +or they are minus the God character and their profession is either a +phantom or hypocrisy. + +Of course men like yourself, who are afraid of being crowded off the +earth, have a special self-given right to raise and cruelly slaughter +any living creature for eating. + +Meat eating will continue until the end of the world, no doubt, but the +Humanitarian will not eat it; it will be devoured by ungodly church +people and outsiders who like the flavor of flesh food, regardless of +the wrong of premeditated killing. + + T. J. W. + + Compton, Cal. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + + * * * * * + +Transcriber's Notes + +Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected. + +The repetition of the headings "QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS" on five and +"IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES" on three consecutive pages has been removed. + +Italics are represented thus _italics_. + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Humanitarian Philosophy, 4th Edition, by +Emil Edward Kusel + +*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 48589 *** diff --git a/48589-h/48589-h.htm b/48589-h/48589-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5be48a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/48589-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,1976 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" /> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of Humanitarian Philosophy, by Emil Edward Kusel. + </title> + <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" /> + <style type="text/css"> + +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +h1 +{ + margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em; + text-align: center; + font-size: x-large; + font-weight: normal; + line-height: 1.6; +} + + h2,h3{ + text-align: center; + clear: both; + } + +div.chapter {page-break-before: always;} + +p +{ + margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; +} + +.pi {margin-left: 40%;} + +hr { + width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: 33.5%; + margin-right: 33.5%; + clear: both; +} + +hr.tb {width: 45%; margin-left: 27.5%; margin-right: 27.5%;} +hr.chap {width: 65%; margin-left: 17.5%; margin-right: 17.5%;} +hr.small {width: 20%; margin-left: 40%; margin-right: 40%;} + + +.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ + /* visibility: hidden; */ + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; +} /* page numbers */ + + +.blockquote { + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +div.hangsection p {text-indent: -3em; margin-left: 3em;} + +.bbox {border: solid medium;} + +.center {text-align: center;} + +.right {text-align: right;} + + +.small {font-size: small;} + + +/* Images */ +.figcenter {margin: 1em auto; text-align: center;} +.caption {font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;} + + +/* Poetry */ +.poem-container +{ + text-align: center; +} + +.poem +{ + display: inline-block; + text-align: left; +} + +.poem .stanza {margin: 1em auto;} + +.poem .verse +{ + text-indent: -3em; + padding-left: 3em; +} + +@media handheld +{ + .poem + { + display: block; + margin-left: 1em; + } +} + .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 1em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i6 {display: block; margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i16 {display: block; margin-left: 8em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + +/* Transcriber's notes */ +.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA; + color: black; + font-size:smaller; + padding:0.5em; + margin-bottom:5em; + font-family:sans-serif, serif; } + </style> + </head> +<body> +<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 48589 ***</div> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 337px;"> +<img src="images/portrait.jpg" width="337" height="600" alt="" /> +<div class="caption">Emil Edward Kusel</div> +</div> + +<div class="bbox"> +<h1>Humanitarian + +Philosophy</h1> + + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p class="center">By</p> + +<p class="center">EMIL EDWARD KUSEL</p> + + +<p class="center">Extracts From His Letters</p> + +<p class="center">Fourth Edition</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p class="center">Thou shalt not kill.—Bible.</p> + +<p class="center">The individuality created by God is not carnivorous.—Mary Baker G. Eddy.</p> + +<p class="center">Kill not but have regard for life.—Buddha.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p class="center">Los Angeles, California</p> +<p class="center">1912</p> +</div> + +<hr class="tb" /> +<p class="center">Copyright 1912</p> + +<p class="center">by Emil Edward Kusel.</p> + +<p class="center">All rights reserved.</p> +<hr class="tb" /> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p class="center"> +Table of Contents<br /><br /> + +<a href="#NOTE">NOTE.</a><br /> +<a href="#KIND_WORDS">KIND WORDS.</a><br /> +<a href="#COMPLIMENTARY">COMPLIMENTARY.</a><br /> +<a href="#A_NOBLE_WOMAN">A NOBLE WOMAN.</a><br /> +<a href="#THE_HERMIT">THE HERMIT.</a><br /> +<a href="#Humanitarian_Philosophy">Humanitarian Philosophy</a><br /> +<a href="#QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS">QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS</a><br /> +<a href="#IN_AND_BETWEEN_THE_LINES">IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES</a><br /> +<a href="#A_DEVOUT_ADMONITION">A DEVOUT (?) ADMONITION.</a><br /> +<a href="#A_REPLY">A REPLY.</a><br /> +<a href="#FROM_THE_W_A_T_L">FROM THE W. A. T. L.</a><br /> +<a href="#THE_WORST_SIN">THE "WORST" SIN.</a><br /> +<a href="#MAN_AND_BEAST">MAN AND BEAST.</a><br /> +<a href="#VEGETARIANS_REPLY">VEGETARIAN'S REPLY.</a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">1</span></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p01.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + + +<h3 id="NOTE">NOTE.</h3> + + +<p>When one meets with adversity and +all the world seems bitterly against +him or when one realizes the short duration +of life and hopes for a splendid +immortality, no doubt it is a consolation +for many to read the inspired and +lofty sentiments of the Bible.</p> + +<p>Therefore in writing the following +epigrams condemning inhumanity, I felt +confident that kindly people would see +that it is far from my motive to cast +reflection upon any individual inclined +to accept the comforting and humane +passages of either the Old or New Testament.</p> + +<p>I merely aimed to prove the inhuman +Mosaical law giving man the idea to +kill is not a law of a kind and loving +God. I also aimed to prove that the +flesh-eating religionist is an accessory +to a crime more bestial in the sight of +God than any other sin known to the +human family.</p> + +<p class="right"> +EMIL E. KUSEL. </p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p01.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">2</span></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p02.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + + +<h3><a name="KIND_WORDS" id="KIND_WORDS">KIND WORDS.</a></h3> + + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" has +taught me that God and conscience +are in unison. I would have liked to +condemn the writer for opening my eyes +to the truth, but the Lord is on his +side.</p> + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" is an eye +opener for the true religionist who +never before thought on the wickedness +of killing.</p> + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" is a blessing +for those who wish to live the +Christ life, although it will not appeal +to the religionist who is inhumanly +self-righteous.</p> + +<p>Since digesting "Humanitarian Philosophy" +I know a conscientious person +can read the stinging truth without a +selfish protest. The truth is mighty.</p> + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" at first +reading made me angry, but praise God, +the vegetarian's heart is in the right +place.</p> + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" is an inspiration.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p02inv.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">3</span></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p03.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + + +<h3 id="COMPLIMENTARY">COMPLIMENTARY.</h3> + + +<p>Have always been very much interested +in the subjects of our able ministers, +but since receiving a copy of +Mr. Kusel's philosophy against flesh +eating I am a convert to the doctrine +that neither minister nor congregation +can be "a child of God" until they are +vegetarians.</p> + +<p>It is impossible for me to now believe +otherwise on account of the tremendous +cruelty and horror of taking the life of +animals.</p> + +<p>I never thought of the truth as Mr. +Kusel puts it forth, and I am surprised +to think preachers never preached +against blood food. I also thought it +would be meet and proper to criticise +shoe, glove and belt wearing, but the +leather using is a secondary proposition; +the animal is first killed for food +purposes and secondarily to avoid the +waste we may utilize the hide, and still +we should discourage that argument.</p> + +<p>Mr. Kusel is defending God Almighty +nobly in his "Humanitarian Philosophy" +and has given the church doctrines +a slap no man can gainsay.</p> + +<p>When we favor meat eating we favor +killing, and when we favor killing in +the name of God we know we are liars +and murderers, for God is kind and loving, +and surely opposes the taking of +life. Let churches preach the murder +of animals, but pray do not say wickedness +(killing) is God's will. The +world needs more conscientious men +like Mr. Kusel to protect God Almighty +from defamation.</p> + +<p class="right"> +T. J. W. </p> +<p class="center"> +(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p03inv.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">4</span></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p04.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + + +<h3 id="A_NOBLE_WOMAN">A NOBLE WOMAN.</h3> + + +<p> +Mr. Emil Edward Kusel,<br /> +<br /> + Los Angeles, Cal.<br /> +</p> + +<p>Dear Mr. Kusel:—I have been wonderfully +guided and blessed by reading +"Humanitarian Philosophy" as it is +truly an inspired work that should be +thought upon by all religious people.</p> + +<p>The beauty of your blessed reasoning +is that you cast all biblical chaff +to the four winds and look to God in +the true light of love and mercy.</p> + +<p>Yes indeed, you show the inconsistency +of a religion that gives us an +evil right to kill things while every +last one of us, without exception, cling +to life with the tenacity of a coward.</p> + +<p>You fully convince me that false +prophets had a hand in writing the +Scriptures because God in His Infinite +Love could not have created the dear +innocent lamb our Savior carried in his +bosom to be killed nor could he have +created the sweet little baby calf to be +slain and eaten by human beings. You +convince me that God is not in the +slaughter-house, neither in the midst +of those who patronize the butcher any +more than He is in the heart of the +wild beast of prey.</p> + +<p>I do believe in a personal God as I +could not live without hope for a +blissful future life beyond the grave. +This pilgrimage, to me, without religion +would make this world a very +dreary and lonesome place.</p> + +<p>Heretofore I lived a carnivorous life, +always wondering why God created +poor sentient things for human food +but now, thank God, I realize, without +humanitarianism spirituality is not a +reality and I applaud such men as Mr. +Kusel for standing out boldly on a +grand philosophy that puts all church +doctrines to shame and presents a religion +consistent with reason.</p> + +<p>Your trend of thought, my dear +brother, is indeed marvelous from a +gracious heart and I believe some +mighty power is preparing you for a +special great work.</p> + +<p class="pi"> +Yours very truly,</p> +<p class="right"> +MRS. J. R. B. </p> +<p> +St. Paul, Minn., May 16, 1911.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p04.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">5</span></p> + + +<h3 id="THE_HERMIT">THE HERMIT.</h3> +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">No flocks that roam the valley free,<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i2">To slaughter I condemn,<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">Taught by the power that pities me,<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i2">I learn to pity them.<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i16">—Goldsmith.</span></div> +</div></div></div> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>In religion, what damned error but some +sober brow will bless it and approve it with a +text, hiding the grossness with fair ornament.</p> + +<p class="right"> +—Shakespeare. +</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The untold suffering the human family sanctions +through a wrong conception of what is +right, should make every Christian heart ache.</p> + +<p class="right"> +—Platt. +</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>When men go hunting (to kill) they call it +sport but when the hunted animal (perhaps +wounded) turns to fight for its life, they call +<em>that</em> ferocity.—Shaw.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Let all creatures live, as we desire to live.</p> + +<p class="right"> +—Tolstoy. +</p> +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">6</span></p> + + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p06.jpg" alt="Decorative Border" /> +</div> + + +<h3 id="THE_RELIGION_OF_BUDDHA">THE RELIGION OF BUDDHA.</h3> + +<p class="center">(An Idea from "Light of Asia.")</p> +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">'Twere good to be humane<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">to the helpless beast;<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">Better than to deplore the<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">sins of the world<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">With priests who pray for<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">mankind,<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">And yet have no mercy<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">on God's dumb creatures—<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">"They pray for mercy<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">Whilst they themselves<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">are merciless."<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i16">—Kusel.</span></div> +</div></div></div> + + + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p06.jpg" alt="Decorative Border" /> +</div> + + +<hr class="chap" /><div class="chapter" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">7</span></p> + + + + +<h2 id="Humanitarian_Philosophy">Humanitarian Philosophy</h2> + +<p class="center">By Emil Edward Kusel</p> + +<p>No doubt some of the conscience-stricken +readers will brand the author of the sentiments +herein as an extremist rather than a humane enthusiast, +but bethink yourself it is far better to +be "an extremist" on a logical, noble basis than +to be inconsistent under false pretense.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The author is presenting truths from an absolutely +rational standpoint standing firmly on a +real philosophical basis that cannot be overthrown +by a cyclone of protests from the "religious" +flesh-eating faction.</p> + +<p>The idea is to show that man, when he gets +"right with God," drifts away from the customs +of ancient times and reasons from the +Golden Rule foundation which is consistent +with a higher life and makes him religiously humane +as well as "pious."</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>You may allow your quasi-religious principle to +prevail against reason; you may pout and cry +against the Humanitarian's noble philosophy; +you may dream of the imps of hell awaiting his +quietus; you may consult your Bible to bless +your inhumanity and yet mercy for our dumb +fellow-creatures is unselfish, pure and gentle, +resultant from a proper conception of man's superiority +and his God.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">8</span></p> + +<p>If a man's religion is pure and good and undefiled +it would be wrong to present facts to +blast his belief (be it ever so superstitious); +however, when he insists upon inhumanity toward +any sentient creature, he should be severely +criticised.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The scriptural passages that are well flavored +with indecency and the scriptural inhumanity +written in God's name are not one whit more +inspired than are the objectionable lines of sensational +literature.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The Bible has caused more bloodshed, more +hatred; made more hypocrites and caused more +suffering than all else combined. It is a book +containing some lofty ideas and moral laws by +good men, but the many inconsistencies therein +have caused superstition, imagination, insanity, +contemptibility and horrible cruelty that haunts +the brain of the honorable thinking masses.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>It is proper to impress indelibly in the minds +of the pretenders of the several creeds "Thou +shalt not kill;" neither shalt thou be accessory +in the killing by encouraging the slaughter +through patronage.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">9</span></p> + +<p>You may erect your massive temples and +dedicate them to Jehovah; you may pray to your +heart's content and sing psalms until doomsday, +yet the earthquake, the cyclone, the tornado, +the volcano overthrows the synagogue, the cathedral, +the church, the brothel and the saloon +without distinction. Evidently the god of Abraham, +Isaac and Jacob is not omnipresent to protect +an institution that stands for inhumanity.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>One of the most noticeable inconsistencies +ever presented to thinking people is the representation +of "Divine Love" portrayed under the +title "Peace," symbolized by a child leading +the cow, the calf, the lion, the leopard and the +lamb. This taken from the Bible, is supposed +to represent, "And a little child shall lead +them."</p> + +<p>Just think of symbolizing "Peace" with an +innocent child leading animals we actually murder! +No doubt every religionist looks upon +that painting as a masterpiece—an inspiration. +Yet most of them sanction the slaughter of innocence +by relishing a lamb chop or a veal +cutlet.</p> + +<p>"And a little child shall lead them!" +Whither? To the slaughter? Is not that a +miserable symbolization of "Divine Love" and +"Peace?"</p> + +<p>Such inconsistency painted in the name of religion +is an abomination and deserves strenuous +criticism.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">10</span></p> + +<p>Not the least in the realm of inconsistency +are the Jewish people who fast on their day of +atonement and break the Sabbath fifty-two times +a year by bartering. Now where is the consistency +in such an atonement when the Bible +says explicitly: "Remember the Sabbath day +and keep it holy."</p> + +<p>Such incongruity is practised universally +among the orthodox as well as the reformed +element. Like the Gentile, the Jewish religionist, +notwithstanding that he admits the horror +of viewing the death throes of a butchered animal, +eats his flesh food "kosher" to satisfy his +palate rather than live up to the promptings +of conscience.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism, and +Christian Sciencism alike disregard the sacredness +of all animal kingdom, and yet, after admitting +the horror of the slaughter pen, they all encourage +the merciless killing under the cloak +of the Bible.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>"The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose" +may well be applied to the religionist who +upholds the killing of our dumb fellow creatures.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The fact that the Bible encourages the murder +of an animal proves it is not entirely from +the pen of holy men.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">11</span></p> + +<p>The individual who professes religion and +says it is right to slay and eat when he can live +without taking sentient life, on the vegetation +which nature so bountifully provides, is a liar, +a murderer and a hypocrite in his own higher +conscience.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The so-called devout man wants to live and +enjoy life, but he eats of the innocent animal +that has been battered to death by the blow of +the ax; he contends that a body which suffers +pain was created for slaughter to satisfy his +beastly palate. Such a man is destitute of the +very essence of God-life be he minister, church-goer +or layman.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Above all things the minister of the Gospel +and the church attendant should be kind and +considerate toward all animal creation and +should construe the Scriptures and preach to +prove the sacredness of their Holy Bible. They +should do God's will one earth as it is in +Heaven, absolutely abstaining from the fleshpots +of Egypt, thereby discouraging the blotting +out of animal life, proving conclusively +by their lives that their God is just and kind +and merciful.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The man who opposes the spilling of life +blood of Nature's creatures is on the higher +plane of life.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">12</span></p> + +<p>After searching for a mode of living through +which we might find perfect peace on earth +and good will toward our fellow-men, we become +partially interested in the different religions, +but we cannot conscientiously close our +eyes and believe a meat-eating, gormandizing +religionist is undefiled and passing on to spiritual +perfection to ultimately, at dissolution, burst +into a glorious immortality.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Read the memorable Sermon on the Mount, +supposed to have been delivered by Christ Jesus, +and note the humility, the tenderness, the love +and all therein that is grand and noble—then +decide that such a meek and lowly Nazarene +could have eaten of the fleshpots or even have +sanctioned the killing of any living creature, and +you deprive that character of the very essence +of divinity.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Flesh eating man's religion cannot emanate +from a kindly heart because with all his intellectuality +and knowledge of right and wrong, +his animalistic tendencies are in excess. His +horror for the slaughter pen is conclusive and +positive evidence that the higher consciousness +is dormant proving that carnivorous man hath +no pre-eminence above the beast.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">13</span></p> + +<p>We fail to see any Christianity in the present-day +Sunday churchianity, and we positively +know there is nothing sacred in the person upholding +the merciless slaughter of animals. +Through all this we are made to fully realize +the inconsistency of nearly all religious professions. +We finally study the Laws of Nature, +and we live from that time on according to the +dictates of conscience and reason, with some +little faith in addition. The first thought that +impresses us is the inhuman custom of taking +life blood, knowing that every man, woman +and child, who possesses an atom of feeling, +would shudder to look upon the butchery of +our dumb fellow-creatures, and we know if the +horror of the slaughter pen is admitted, it surely +is a heinous crime to slaughter. Then we begin to +delve deep into the real scientific subjects of real +scientific men and really discover the real body +builders are proper food, proper mastication, +proper air and proper breathing, and occasional +proper fasting, etc. We live the life as recommended +by these noble logicians and benefactors. +Now we look from the heights to the +vast expanse of empty faith cure, cults and isms, +creeds and dogmas, and theories, and realize +how narrow they all are by not embodying humanitarianism +and the laws of health and hygiene +in their teachings.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>From a spiritual conception, it is just as +reasonable to recommend human cannibalism as +the eating of butcher shop carrion.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">14</span></p> + +<p>The 25th day of December is the day set +aside to present gifts to our sweethearts, wives +and friends; the day Santa Claus brings toys +to our little ones to overflow their little hearts +with gladness, but mainly to commemorate the +birth of one of the kindliest characters the world +has ever known.</p> + +<p>That holy day is horribly desecrated by the +quasi-pious element throughout our Christian +land in the killing of countless numbers of Nature's +sentient creation.</p> + +<p>Thanksgiving Day, likewise set aside for a +sacred purpose—to thank God for the many +blessings bestowed upon our great nation—is also +desecrated by religious people as well as by the +laity. On the day we should send our thanks +to that invisible something (The First Great +Cause) we praise an imaginary personal deity +by killing things to satiate the craving of the +palate.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The Bible condemns the eating of swine flesh +(Deut. 14: 8; Is. 65: 4), but what care the +pharisee so long as he intends pleasing the palate +rather than obey the law of his God and conscience?</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>When we reach the Holy Mountain (consistent +religion) we will abstain from eating +flesh food and have a heartfelt desire for all +creatures to live and enjoy life as we wish to +live (Golden Rule.)</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">15</span></p> + +<p>Selfish civilized intellectual human takes his +gun and repairs to the forest and wantonly +slaughters wild game. Perhaps he kills outright; +perhaps he wounds; perhaps the animal +he has wounded is dying a slow, painful death; +perhaps he wounds or kills a mother and the +young are starving in nest or lair, and perhaps +a professed Jew, Catholic, Protestant or Christian +Scientist is relishing the seasoned carrion +while the little ones are dying for the want of +that mother's care. God forbid the belief in +such a god!</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The huntsman, who wounds the wild game, +goes to his couch and rests peacefully while +the poor dumb, wounded animal is dying in +the forest, suffering most excruciating pain.</p> + +<p>The deer, the dove, the quail and all of +Nature's blood creation must suffer with horrifying +wounds at the hands of the thoughtless, +cruel hunter; upheld by so-called religious people +who contend that such inhumanity is permissible +in God's sight.</p> + +<p>This very day thousands upon thousands of +our dumb fellow-creatures are suffering agonizing +deaths caused through wounds inflicted +by the merciless hunter; and thousands upon +thousands of professed Jews, Catholics, Protestants +and Christian Scientists worship the god +that tolerates such cruelty. Hypocrisy! Inconsistency! +Shame!</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">16</span></p> + +<p>Sift mankind down to his noblest thought, +and he must admit the life of an animal is just +as sacred as his own.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Knowing that all humanity feels the horrors +of taking the life blood of defenseless animals, +you are compelled to condemn every religious +institution that does not embody within its creed +the vegetarian diet.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Animals instinctively flee from danger, and +suffer pain, which proves the brute creation has +a right to an appointed time upon the earth. +When man slaughters these helpless creatures +under the selfish idea that they were created for +that purpose, he is destitute of divine principle.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The almighty dollar is the god of the civilized +people—mankind takes the sacred life +blood of God's creatures and barters the carcass +in exchange for money. Nearly all clergymen +and the laity eat of the murdered animal. +Shame!</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Let us be at least considerate and reason on +the side of mercy. If your religion sanctions +the killing of innocent animals, well then, in the +name of all that is pure and good, lay aside +your religion and get your soul in tune with the +Infinite, and then use your faculties of reason +to develop up to the highest ideal.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">17</span></p> + +<p>Condemn the killing of innocent, defenseless +animals, and do away with the fleshpots of +Egypt, and praise Deity for endowing you with +reason sufficient to realize the wrong of shedding +life blood, and then sing hosannas for the +nobility of living according to the promptings of +higher conscience.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Do not think of the savory beef and mutton +as it hangs in the market place, but turn your +mind and heart to the abattoirs and see the +horror of slaughter and then acknowledge that +if God is not in the slaughter house to hinder +the killing of a dumb brute he is surely not in +the churches reserving crowns and halos for +a sanctimonious element whose palate takes +precedence of principle.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The church folk encourage the killing of +quadruped, fish and fowl and then have the +audacity to say grace at meal time, thanking +God and imploring Him to shower blessings +upon them.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>You believe in all that elevates man to the +highest standard of excellence and yet in the +eating of a slaughtered animal you are an accessory +to the crime of murder—a crime that +is far more morally wrong and horrible than +any so-called venial sin.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">18</span></p> + +<p>The man who "believes" and has "faith" +solely for his soul's safety through fear rather +than through love; the man who affiliates with +the church with mercenary motive; the man who +testifies with lying tongue to the virtue of his +carnivorous unfeeling religion; the man who +shifts the blame of his cussedness to the mythical +Satan; the man who is weak and bent toward +religious emotionalism; the man who sees +the mote in every eye but his own; the man +who stands on the street corner preaching hell +and damnation, "fighting the devil," are the +sorts of men who decry that all beings have an +equal right to live.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>If perchance a fellow human becomes tired +and weary of the vicissitudes of this world and +cancels his own captivity (suicide), we frantically +throw up our hands realizing the enormity +of such a crime.</p> + +<p>His life is his own and he may do as he +pleases; his sin of self-destruction is between himself +and his God, and yet we grieve at such a sad +exit. The very same man who shudders at the +uncanny thought of another's self-murder will +uphold the killing of a dumb brute to satiate +the "human" palate. The animal does not want +to die yet the intelligent man who has a "merciful +loving God" makes murder permissible taking +his authority from the book he calls "The +Sacred Bible."</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">19</span></p> + +<p>The Proverbs, the Psalms, the Sermon on +the Mount, and many other portions of the +Good Book are beautiful, and no doubt the +writers of the select passages were inspired, +but the evil spirit was surely predominant in the +man who depicted the Prince of Peace, in all +his humility, as a flesh eater.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>A pitiful story to be told about a little girl +whose father was supposed to be very devout, +and in whose residence the motto,</p> + +<p class="center">"GODI S NOW HERE I NOUR HOME"</p> + +<p>adorned the wall, confusedly printed by her +illiterate parent.</p> + +<p>One beautiful day, as all nature seemed in +perfect harmony, the child strolled to the barnyard +where the hired man was killing the petted +calf preparatory to having a great feast in honor +of the son, returning from a western college of +theology.</p> + +<p>A thought struck the child as she saw the +life blood of an innocent animal ebbing away, +through a horrible knife wound.</p> + +<p>She hastened back to her father's home, sad +but wiser, and appropriately divided the motto +on the wall:</p> + +<p class="center">GOD IS NO WHERE IN OUR HOME.</p> + +<p>or as Daniel interpreted King Belshazzar's +dream, the thinking child weighed her +papa in the balances and found him very much +wanting in God principle.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">20</span></p> + +<p>Many so-called pious people throughout the +land condemn theaters, dancing, sociable drinking, +prize-fighting, card playing, pastime +smoking, Sunday recreation, the innocent custom +of Santa Claus and the comic supplements +of our Sunday newspapers, yet none of these +pleasures and pastimes could be half so abominable +and sinful as the encouragement of +slaughter.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Every church member construes the Scriptures +to please his own individuality; sometimes he +construes literally but when the passage does +not coincide with his appetite or manner of +living he invariably finds a figurative meaning.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>We justify almost any sort of life by the +Holy Bible, but we cannot pull the blinds over +the eyes of conscience.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The Women's Christian Temperance Union +cannot influence towards reformation effectively; +the women of this religious order are trying +to defeat liquor and cigarette traffic, yet loth +to realize under their profession of Christianity, +they are sinners greater than either the unfortunate +cigarette fiend or the drunkard, because +they all admit the horror of killing, at the same +time relishing a mess of carrion, thereby virtually +encouraging the killer to kill more.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">21</span></p> + +<p>The tiger pounces upon the giraffe and rides +it to death, all the while tearing the flesh from +the bleeding animal; the puma pounces upon the +mountain goat; the hyena tears the entrails from +its living prey and the cat pounces upon the +beautiful song bird and takes its innocent life—where +is your merciful, loving, personal God?</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The religionist who lives on hallucination or +believes that faith alone "is the substance of +things hoped for, the evidence of things not +seen," and will not reason, is living in the dark +ages still.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>If one desires going into absolute truth concerning +the killing of helpless animals, he +may justly condemn the wearing of leather +shoes, gloves, etc., all of which are worn contrary +to Nature's Law.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The self-styled religious element send missionaries +to foreign lands to spread the gospel +of love when they, themselves, as well as those +they send, are insufficiently human to recognize +the brutality of slaughter.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Take man to the slaughter house to view +the butchery, and then if he contends God +created helpless, dumb brutes for the slaughter +pen, he is positively heartless. If he shudders +to witness the hideous butchery, that proves +conclusively that God is not omnipresent.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">22</span></p> + +<p>If man wishes to disregard spirituality and +remain an agnostic, infidel or an atheist, that is +his privilege and he may continue eating carrion +and encouraging slaughter, from the lower animal +plane, but when he steps over the threshold +into religion and affiliates with the churches and +talks of man's pre-eminence above the beast he +must of necessity be in sympathy with his dumb +fellow creatures and abstain from flesh-eating +to discourage all things not in harmony with +God. (Higher self).</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Does it not hurt the innocent lamb when +you cut its little throat? Does it not hurt the +little calf when you take its tender life? Does +it not hurt the cow when you wield the axe with +tremendous force against its forehead? Does it +not hurt the sheep when in the agonies of death? +Does it not hurt when the goat pitifully gurgles +the sound "Oh Lord," as its life-blood is passing +the butcher's knife? If pain does attend +this horrible inhumanity of man, what right +then has he to establish for himself a God in +Heaven when in reality he hath no more feeling +in his miserable carcass than hath the cannibal +of the uncivilized isles.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>All things may be possible to God, but the +idea of placing the breath of life into our fellow-beings +to be snuffed out by a superior intellectual +animal is the absurdest of all absurdities.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">23</span></p> + +<p>Dancing, theater-going, rag-time music, and +all other pleasures to kill the monotony of daily +routine, are under the ban of the churches. We +carry ourselves aloof from these awful (?) sins +and walk in the attitude of solemnity to impress +Almighty God with our piety. We preach +against liquor and tobacco while we ourselves +are addicted to the use of tea and coffee (stimulants). +We condemn everything we ourselves +do not care for and we jealously admonish others +to be just like us. Now if dancing, theater-going, +rag-time music, etc., and the immoralities +of life are sins of venial proportion, of what colossal +magnitude must be the sin of taking life +we cannot restore and how immeasurably hellish +are the churches that uphold the killing in the +name of a merciful God!</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The dumb animals were created by Nature +same as man (except that we are a little above +the animal in intellect), and have a divine right +to live out their respective allotted time same as +man (minister, church-goer or layman.)</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The Buddhist who regards all animal life sacred +is on the right path to spirituality, while the +carnivorous Jew, Catholic and Protestant are +drifting in the rut of dark age fantasy and +fanaticism.</p> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">24</span></p> + + + + +<h3 id="QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS">QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS</h3> + + +<p>Q. Are you not a little bit radical on the +subject of Humanitarianism?</p> + +<p>A. To you I may be "a little bit radical" +because I oppose all religions (yours inclusive) +which make mankind selfish and unfeeling.</p> + +<p>Q. If the Bible teaches me to slay and eat +have I not a right to eat flesh?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, a legal right and your Bible right, +but not a moral right.</p> + +<p>Q. Do not some people believe it is right +to slay and eat lower animals?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, from their palate, but all honorable +conscientious men see a wrong in taking +life.</p> + +<p>Q. Has not environment throughout one's +life something to do with our eating of flesh?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, but come out of it and be in line +with a grander, nobler and consistent life. Lay +aside your palate and let your conscience rule.</p> + +<p>Q. Is not the devil in your philosophy?</p> + +<p>A. It seems so to you because it is an exposé +of churchianity, proving beyond question the +nothingness of the flesh eating religionist's piety.</p> + +<p>Q. Suppose man lives in a country where +he cannot find vegetarian food?</p> + +<p>A. Then he might be justified in eating +flesh to preserve his life.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">25</span></p> + +<p>Q. If there is no personal God, who created +this world?</p> + +<p>A. It is a scientific proposition, and +so acknowledged by all thinking men.</p> + +<p>Q. Do church people get angry at your +philosophy?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, sometimes, as when their conscience +is seared by a hot iron.</p> + +<p>Q. Have not vegetables life?</p> + +<p>A. Not life which suffers an evident pain +nor do they flee when you threaten to pluck +them. Such a question is invariably asked by a +carnivorous wiseacre.</p> + +<p>Q. Why are all Vegetarians lank, lean and +skinny?</p> + +<p>A. Because you like the taste of meat and +intend to continue eating it.</p> + +<p>Q. I know animals have fear and pain, but +supposing God did place them on earth for man +to slay and eat, what then?</p> + +<p>A. "God" is no better then than your +"devil."</p> + +<p>Q. What were animals created for?</p> + +<p>A. What were YOU created for?</p> + +<p>Q. What is your conception of God?</p> + +<p>A. Nature. Higher self—Conscience.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">26</span></p> + +<p>Q. Do you not kill insects when you drink +water; and do you not cripple and trample +harmless bugs to death with every step you take?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, but involuntarily and not with premeditation +and not selfishly to satisfy an inhuman +desire or appetite.</p> + +<p>Q. Would you "swat" a fly or kill a flea +or a snake?</p> + +<p>A. If a pest or venomous reptile disturbed +my peace and quiet I would be justified in protecting +myself.</p> + +<p>Q. Is not the survival of the fittest a natural +law; consequently being superior I may slay and +eat?</p> + +<p>A. That's your idea because the "fittest" is +yourself—in your own estimation and power; but +there's no godliness in such a contention. It is +your selfish conclusion that might is right at the +expense of sentient life.</p> + +<p>Q. Do I not work hard and do I not know +that I need meat to sustain me in my manual +labor? Do I not know what my system needs.</p> + +<p>A. Your system does not require food which +must come from a murdered animal! When you +contend that you must subsist on flesh, you know +not whereof you speak. You are talking to uphold +your inhuman appetite.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">27</span></p> + +<p>Q. Where would medical research be were +it not for vivisection (torture) and killing animals +for experiment in the interest of science?</p> + +<p>A. I do not know, but I do know scientific +men have not a moral right to torture and kill +harmless, helpless animals. Experimenting in +surgery, etc., should be done on humans who believe +in the advancement of medical science at +the expense of life.</p> + +<p>Q. Do you object to the infidel eating flesh +food?</p> + +<p>A. I do not object to anyone eating flesh +food—eat whatever you like, but I do point +out the wrong of taking life and I emphatically +say the religious institution upholding slaughter +is a farce and a pharisaical monument to a man-made +deity.</p> + +<p>Q. Do you actually consider flesh eating +the most abominable of sins?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, absolutely the most abominable.</p> + +<p>Q. What do you think of religious emotionalism +and ecstasy?</p> + +<p>A. If from the mouth of a carnivorous +worshipper it is sham and pretense—a mockery.</p> + +<p>Q. Is not your feeling toward animals +mawkish sentimentality?</p> + +<p>A. There is no such thing as mawkish sentimentality +in decrying inhumanity.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">28</span></p> + +<p>Q. Do not the lower animals prey upon +one another, and do not the big fish eat the little +fish?</p> + +<p>A. You profess to be above the inferior +animals and you profess to have a soul; you also +have a Golden Rule supposed to have been +handed down by a kind and merciful Creator.</p> + +<p>Q. What shall we do with all the animals +if we do not kill them?</p> + +<p>A. Is that why you eat flesh?</p> + +<p>Q. Do you really think carnivorous +churchites are not of God?</p> + +<p>A. I don't <em>think</em> it, I <em>know</em> it <em>absolutely</em>, because +I know it is wrong to kill and I know they +know it and I know they search the Scriptures +for "proof" to satisfy palate while Conscience +rebels.</p> + +<p>Q. What do you think of a religionist who +says, "I am living under a new dispensation +since Christ came and went, and I now eat anything +the Lord sets before me?"</p> + +<p>A. If he means he can eat at the expense +of sentient life he is not a Godly man; he is +not living in harmony with the Golden Rule; +he is not living according to the promptings of +a higher self, consequently the God spirit is dormant.</p> + +<hr class="chap" /> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">29</span></p> + +<p>The church carnivora's favorite Bible quotations +to justify his inhumanity are invariably +quoted from a petrified conscience and the region +of the palate. Here are several of the +passages:</p> + +<blockquote> + +<p>"There is nothing from without a +man, entering into him can defile him; +but the things which come out of him, +those are they that defile the man."</p></blockquote> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<blockquote> + +<p>"For one believeth that he may eat all +things; another, who is weak, eateth +herbs. But to him that esteemeth anything +to be unclean to him it is unclean."</p></blockquote> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<blockquote> + +<p>"Now the spirit speaketh expressly, +that in the latter times some shall depart +from the faith, giving heed to seducing +spirits and doctrines of devils. +Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their +conscience seared with a hot iron; commanding +to abstain from meats, which +God hath created to be received with +thanksgiving of them, which believe and +know the truth. For every creature of +God is good, and nothing to be refused, +if it be received with thanksgiving; for +it is sanctified by the word of God and +prayer."</p></blockquote> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<blockquote> + +<p>"In a trance I saw a vision; a certain +vessel descend as it had been a great +sheet let down from heaven by four corners. +I considered and saw four-footed +beasts of the earth and beasts and +creeping things and fowls of the air; +and a voice said unto me, Arise, Peter, +slay and eat."</p></blockquote> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">30</span></p> + + + + +<h2 id="IN_AND_BETWEEN_THE_LINES">IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES</h2> + + +<p>The Bible says: Be not among eaters of +flesh.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: It is better to hear the rebuke +of the wise than to hear the hymns of fools.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: If an animal dieth of itself +do not eat it but give it to thy neighbor and let +him eat thereof.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Who knoweth that the +spirit of man goeth upward and the spirit of the +beast goeth downward?</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Your stomachs are an open +sepulchre.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Blessed are the merciful, +for they shall obtain mercy.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Prove all things and hold +fast of that which is good.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Do not be as the hypocrites +are, testifying in public places and yet living +apart from God.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Reason is too high for a +fool.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: He that follows after mercy +findeth life.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: The wise man's eyes are in +his head (he reasons), but the fool's eyes are +neither here nor there, he walketh in darkness.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">31</span></p> + +<p>The Bible says: When a man's ways are in +harmony with higher consciousness he maketh +his enemies be at peace with him.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: The Spirit of God made +Samson a murderer.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: The beasts of the field shall +honor me.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Fool thou art to believe all +that the prophets have said.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: God sent plagues to torment +his people.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Shed not innocent blood.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Praise the Lord every living +creature—the beasts of the field, the birds of +the air and earth, the fish of the waters and +all mankind.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Thy will be done on earth +as it is in Heaven.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Thou art weighed in the +balances and art found wanting.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: There are many false lords +and false gods the people are worshipping.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Come now, let us reason +together.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Faith without works is dead.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: He that killeth an ox is as +if he slew a human.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">32</span></p> + +<p>The Bible says: Beast and man have one +breath; so that man hath no pre-eminence above +the beast; as one dieth so dieth the other.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Thou hast neither part nor +lot in this matter for thy heart is not right in +the sight of God.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Every moving thing that +liveth (grain, fruits, vegetables, nuts, etc.) shall +be food for you, but flesh with the life thereof +which is blood shall ye not eat.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: God blessed every creature.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Behold I have given you +every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face +of the earth and every tree, on the which is +the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall +be for food.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: All that cry Lord, Lord, +are not of God.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: They shall not hurt nor +destroy in all my Holy Mountain.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: I am God, I change not.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Do a little consistent heart +cleaning so that the human mind's eye shall be +spiritual to see and segregate right from wrong.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Christ taught love, leniency, +forgiveness, tenderness and mercy.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Dead flies cause the apothecary's +ointment to send forth a stinking savour.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">33</span></p> + +<p>Capital punishment or legalized murder is +another miscarriage of consistency; it does not +dovetail into mercy and it does not blend into +the law that God has given man an allotted +time upon the earth. What right have twelve +jurors to virtually cancel the life of a murderer? +Incarcerate the offender under a life sentence +with proper food and training, and ultimately +that murderer's heart and soul might be purer +than Judge, jurors and all connected with the +courts of justice.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>If a criminal under excitement or cool premeditation +takes the life of a human being, the +cool, considerate jurors, responsible for the death +penalty, are just as guilty of murder as the +prisoner.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The butcher is rejected as a juror on a murder +trial on the ground that his business has +hardened his heart, and yet the Judge of the +Superior Court, the sheriff and his deputies and +the eligible jurors all eat of the beef the butcher +slaughters.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Despite the protests that may come to the +surface in reading the inspired, pointed truths, +the fact should be reiterated that Justice, Kindness +and Mercy for every living creature is in +the heart and soul of the true religionist.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">34</span></p> + +<p>The sand-blind carnivorous faith curist +(who reads his Bible through a pair of eye-glasses +not made by God Almighty) tells us of +a divine healing power.</p> + +<p>We hear many testimonies from the lips of +these people praising this wonderful (?) curative +agency, but when sensibly considered we +know the "power" removes only visionary ills.</p> + +<p>Imaginary tumors, etc., hypochondria and +other nervous troubles readily yield to this mythical +physician, but no disease or defect in reality, +can be removed until we remove the physical +cause.</p> + +<p>If we continue living regardless of natural +health laws all the "belief" and all the "faith" +and all the "Blood" cannot offset the inevitable +result of continued disobedience.</p> + +<p>They sometimes speculate as to the stubbornness +and apparent incurability of an ailment and +finally lay the blame to a spiritual insufficiency. +Ridiculous!</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Mankind is filled with patriotism when a +victorious war is ended, forgetting the awful +gloom pervading some poor mother's home. +The higher self should make us grieve with +those that grieve rather than be exultant at the +loss or downfall of any nation. We should +love all nations and nationalities as we do our +own, and be bound together by inseparable +bonds, realizing that we all must pass to the +final tomb of man on the same level.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">35</span></p> + +<p>A bow of horse hair coming in contact with +the gut strings of a violin produces exquisite +harmony that thrills every fibre of our being +with ecstasy. We can attribute the melody to +the spirit of the deceased animal appealing to +the human heart. Strange that after life has +departed we can charm the muses with tones +produced on a stringed instrument. What human +being has ever bequeathed to the world a +substance to awaken the emotions of our soul +through concord of sweet sounds like unto the +gut of a deceased animal? Evidently there +is more harmony in the entrails of lower creatures +than we find in the entire carcass of religious +civilized carnivorous man.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The scientist who upholds painful experimental +surgery in the interest of science should +give over his own body for experiment instead +of encouraging the cruelties of vivisection. It +hurts being "cut to pieces," consequently the +heartless scientific fellow, instead of offering his +own body for the dissecting table, tortures a +poor friendless dog or other animal.</p> + +<p>The horrible suffering thousands of helpless +creatures have undergone through the process +of vivisection is heartrending.</p> + +<p>There should be stringent law against such +inhumanity.</p> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">36</span></p> + + + + +<h3 id="A_DEVOUT_ADMONITION">A DEVOUT (?) ADMONITION.</h3> + +<p> +E. E. Kusel,<br /> + Los Angeles, Cal.<br /> +</p> + +<p>Sir: I read your "Humanitarian Philosophy" +booklet and I take it as a mass +of devil talk. It is not in favor of the +Holy Bible and it says it is wrong to +kill animals. This is crossing God's +word. You say it says swine meat is +forbidden. That is the only true statement +in your book but that is the law +for the Jews only. You say it says +thou shalt not kill; of course it does, +and that has references to the human +family only. You say the religious man +that does not shudder at the works of +a butcher is heartless and godless. You +tell a falsehood there. I have been a +believer fifteen years and I know all +animals were made for man.</p> + +<p>I can see the devil has a powerful +influence over you as it had over Voltaire, +Paine, Ingersoll, Edison, Hubbard +and other non-believers. You infidels +preach against God's Bible and +will be burned in the everlasting fires +of hell for it. You will be glad to have +a drop of cold water in your suffering, +but god will not have mercy—it will be +too late then.</p> + +<p>Hell is full of agnostics and infidels +and non-believers burning and suffering +and I warn you to have a care as +to what you say.</p> + +<p>The Catholics and Christian Scientists +are as much of the devil's doings +as you are, so you'll have company if +you do not repent of your infidelity.</p> + +<p>You are adding to God's word and it +is punishable by his wrath (Rev. 22:18.)</p> + +<p>Your book is a lot of lies and infidelity.</p> + +<p class="right"> +N. S. W. <br /> +Birmingham, Ala., Jan. 30, 1911. </p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">37</span></p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<h3 id="A_REPLY">A REPLY.</h3> + + +<p> +Mr. N. S. W.,<br /> + Birmingham, Ala.<br /> +</p> + +<p>My dear sir: In reply to your letter of +Jan. 30th, concerning my "Humanitarian +Philosophy," I wish to candidly tell +you that I am not at all afraid of your +sort of god. The God I worship is not +very likely to materialize in a selfish +fanatical subject, but always comes to +the surface in the heart and soul of honorable, +conscientious thinking men—men +who either profess nothing and +live according to custom or in men who +profess religion and uphold their God +as kind, loving and merciful.</p> + +<p>This latter man is an ethical vegetarian +and will not accept the cruelties +and inconsistencies of the Bible but +says "it is an error in translation."</p> + +<p>As to the lower animals, one preying +upon the other, the conscientious, devout +Bible believer presents the theory +of his own freeing God Almighty from +the sinful responsibility. He divides +Bible truth from Bible error—he accepts +the lofty and beautiful and holds +fast to that which is good.</p> + +<p>If you intend to preach a gospel of +Love you will find it an utter impossibility +to do so if you do not live a Humanitarian +life—a life that forbids the +killing of any thing that suffers pain, +and fear of death as you yourself may +sometimes suffer.</p> + +<p>In conclusion I wish to impress you +with the fact that your letter is sufficient +proof that you read the Bible in a +haphazard style and know not its contents.</p> + +<p>Every assertion, every quotation and +every conclusion in my "Humanitarian +Philosophy," my dear sir, is absolutely +true and justified.</p> + +<p class="right"> +Respectfully, <br /> +E. E. KUSEL. <br /> +</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">38</span></p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<h3 id="FROM_THE_W_A_T_L">FROM THE W. A. T. L.</h3> + + +<p>The tobacco smoking on street cars +has been very much discussed in your +valuable paper recently. Now, I will +suggest that all persons who object to +the poisonous effects of tobacco register +a protest every chance they get and +spend some good money, as I am doing, +to back up their argument against the +most deadly plant used by human beings. +There is no traffic so degrading +in its influence and effect as tobacco. +It goes hand in hand with liquor, and +when we stop the youth of the land +from using the weed, then the saloon +will have no customers.</p> + +<p class="right"> +G. L. R. </p> + +<p>Founder World's Anti-Tobacco League,<br /> +Los Angeles, Cal.</p> + +<p class="center">(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + + +<h3 id="THE_WORST_SIN">THE "WORST" SIN.</h3> + + +<p>The church element construe the +Bible to blend into their own desires +and appetites and then in the name of +their god (little g) they commit every +iniquity under the sun, the most abominable +of which is the eating of "a beef +which has been battered in the head +by the blow of an ax or mutton which +has had its throat cut from ear to ear."</p> + +<p>Get yourself in touch with the Infinite +and you will see that the taking of +animal life for food is a greater sin +than smoking, drinking or satisfying +animal desires. The three last named +are only sinning against the body but +not commendable by any means, while +the first is the horrible sin of taking +life.</p> + +<p>Carnivorous reader (church people +included) think these lines over well +and then move thy tongue seven times +before thou speakest of sin!</p> + +<p class="right"> +E. E. KUSEL. </p> + +<p>Los Angeles, Cal.</p> + +<p class="center">(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">39</span></p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<h3 id="MAN_AND_BEAST">MAN AND BEAST.</h3> + + +<p>What queer and wild notions religious +faddists get into their heads. T. +J. W. wants us to quit killing cattle +and hogs, etc., in fact all kinds of animals +and birds because God has put +them on earth. I would like Mr W. to +tell us what would become of us if we +followed his advice. Why, the animals +would crowd man off the earth in a +short while. The farmer could not +raise any crops. Cattle, deer, hares and +sheep would eat his grain, the coyotes +his chickens and the lions would eat +him.</p> +<p class="right"> +C. V. Pasadena, Cal. </p> +<p class="center"> +(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<h3 id="VEGETARIANS_REPLY">VEGETARIAN'S REPLY.</h3> + + +<p>If you please, Mr. V., I am not a "religious +faddist." I am not religious at +all. I am a firm believer in the Golden +Rule, applying it to man and beast.</p> + +<p>In reply to your query, Mr. V. I will +answer briefly: Self-preservation is the +first law of nature, so protect yourself +against the presumed invasion of tame +and wild beasts, birds, etc., but do not +presume we have the right to take life +of anything which endures pain or runs +away from impending danger unless +occasion calls for it.</p> + +<p>My letter to the Herald, if you please, +was for those who profess to be godly +and "in the kingdom." Religious people +must be strictly humane or they +are minus the God character and their +profession is either a phantom or hypocrisy.</p> + +<p>Of course men like yourself, who are +afraid of being crowded off the earth, +have a special self-given right to raise +and cruelly slaughter any living creature +for eating.</p> + +<p>Meat eating will continue until the +end of the world, no doubt, but the Humanitarian +will not eat it; it will be +devoured by ungodly church people and +outsiders who like the flavor of flesh +food, regardless of the wrong of premeditated +killing.</p> + +<p class="right"> +T. J. W. </p> +<p> +Compton, Cal.</p> +<p class="center"> +(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<div class="transnote"> +<h3 id="Transcribers_Notes">Transcriber's Notes</h3> + +<p>Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected.</p> + +<p>A Table of Contents has been added.</p> + +<p>The repetition of the headings "QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS" on five and "IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES" +on three consecutive pages has been removed.</p> + +</div> + +<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 48589 ***</div> +</body> +</html> diff --git a/48589-h/images/cover.jpg b/48589-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..be1eb22 --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/images/cover.jpg diff --git a/48589-h/images/decos_p01.jpg b/48589-h/images/decos_p01.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3948029 --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/images/decos_p01.jpg diff --git a/48589-h/images/decos_p02.jpg b/48589-h/images/decos_p02.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8b174b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/images/decos_p02.jpg diff --git a/48589-h/images/decos_p02inv.jpg b/48589-h/images/decos_p02inv.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ffc70ab --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/images/decos_p02inv.jpg diff --git a/48589-h/images/decos_p03.jpg b/48589-h/images/decos_p03.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c8ea8f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/images/decos_p03.jpg diff --git a/48589-h/images/decos_p03inv.jpg b/48589-h/images/decos_p03inv.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4de1a28 --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/images/decos_p03inv.jpg diff --git a/48589-h/images/decos_p04.jpg b/48589-h/images/decos_p04.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b494c08 --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/images/decos_p04.jpg diff --git a/48589-h/images/decos_p06.jpg b/48589-h/images/decos_p06.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0bd244f --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/images/decos_p06.jpg diff --git a/48589-h/images/portrait.jpg b/48589-h/images/portrait.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8e8e475 --- /dev/null +++ b/48589-h/images/portrait.jpg diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..09ebd61 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #48589 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/48589) diff --git a/old/48589-8.txt b/old/48589-8.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..39b867c --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-8.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1700 @@ +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Humanitarian Philosophy, 4th Edition, by +Emil Edward Kusel + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most +other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions +whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of +the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at +www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have +to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook. + + + +Title: Humanitarian Philosophy, 4th Edition + +Author: Emil Edward Kusel + +Release Date: March 26, 2015 [EBook #48589] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK HUMANITARIAN PHILOSOPHY, 4TH *** + + + + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Les Galloway and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.) + + + + + + + +[Illustration: Emil Edward Kusel] + + + Humanitarian + + Philosophy + + * * * * * + + By + + EMIL EDWARD KUSEL + + + Extracts From His Letters + + Fourth Edition + + * * * * * + + Thou shalt not kill.--Bible. + + The individuality created by God is not carnivorous.--Mary Baker G. Eddy. + + Kill not but have regard for life.--Buddha. + + * * * * * + + Los Angeles, California + 1912 + + + + + Copyright 1912 + + by Emil Edward Kusel. + + All rights reserved. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +NOTE. + + +When one meets with adversity and all the world seems bitterly against +him or when one realizes the short duration of life and hopes for a +splendid immortality, no doubt it is a consolation for many to read the +inspired and lofty sentiments of the Bible. + +Therefore in writing the following epigrams condemning inhumanity, I +felt confident that kindly people would see that it is far from my +motive to cast reflection upon any individual inclined to accept the +comforting and humane passages of either the Old or New Testament. + +I merely aimed to prove the inhuman Mosaical law giving man the idea to +kill is not a law of a kind and loving God. I also aimed to prove that +the flesh-eating religionist is an accessory to a crime more bestial in +the sight of God than any other sin known to the human family. + + EMIL E. KUSEL. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +KIND WORDS. + + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" has taught me that God and conscience are in +unison. I would have liked to condemn the writer for opening my eyes to +the truth, but the Lord is on his side. + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" is an eye opener for the true religionist who +never before thought on the wickedness of killing. + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" is a blessing for those who wish to live the +Christ life, although it will not appeal to the religionist who is +inhumanly self-righteous. + +Since digesting "Humanitarian Philosophy" I know a conscientious person +can read the stinging truth without a selfish protest. The truth is +mighty. + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" at first reading made me angry, but praise +God, the vegetarian's heart is in the right place. + +"Humanitarian Philosophy" is an inspiration. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +COMPLIMENTARY. + + +Have always been very much interested in the subjects of our able +ministers, but since receiving a copy of Mr. Kusel's philosophy against +flesh eating I am a convert to the doctrine that neither minister nor +congregation can be "a child of God" until they are vegetarians. + +It is impossible for me to now believe otherwise on account of the +tremendous cruelty and horror of taking the life of animals. + +I never thought of the truth as Mr. Kusel puts it forth, and I am +surprised to think preachers never preached against blood food. I also +thought it would be meet and proper to criticise shoe, glove and belt +wearing, but the leather using is a secondary proposition; the animal +is first killed for food purposes and secondarily to avoid the waste we +may utilize the hide, and still we should discourage that argument. + +Mr. Kusel is defending God Almighty nobly in his "Humanitarian +Philosophy" and has given the church doctrines a slap no man can +gainsay. + +When we favor meat eating we favor killing, and when we favor killing +in the name of God we know we are liars and murderers, for God is kind +and loving, and surely opposes the taking of life. Let churches preach +the murder of animals, but pray do not say wickedness (killing) is +God's will. The world needs more conscientious men like Mr. Kusel to +protect God Almighty from defamation. + + T. J. W. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +A NOBLE WOMAN. + + + Mr. Emil Edward Kusel, + + Los Angeles, Cal. + +Dear Mr. Kusel:--I have been wonderfully guided and blessed by reading +"Humanitarian Philosophy" as it is truly an inspired work that should +be thought upon by all religious people. + +The beauty of your blessed reasoning is that you cast all biblical +chaff to the four winds and look to God in the true light of love and +mercy. + +Yes indeed, you show the inconsistency of a religion that gives us +an evil right to kill things while every last one of us, without +exception, cling to life with the tenacity of a coward. + +You fully convince me that false prophets had a hand in writing the +Scriptures because God in His Infinite Love could not have created +the dear innocent lamb our Savior carried in his bosom to be killed +nor could he have created the sweet little baby calf to be slain +and eaten by human beings. You convince me that God is not in the +slaughter-house, neither in the midst of those who patronize the +butcher any more than He is in the heart of the wild beast of prey. + +I do believe in a personal God as I could not live without hope for a +blissful future life beyond the grave. This pilgrimage, to me, without +religion would make this world a very dreary and lonesome place. + +Heretofore I lived a carnivorous life, always wondering why God created +poor sentient things for human food but now, thank God, I realize, +without humanitarianism spirituality is not a reality and I applaud +such men as Mr. Kusel for standing out boldly on a grand philosophy +that puts all church doctrines to shame and presents a religion +consistent with reason. + +Your trend of thought, my dear brother, is indeed marvelous from a +gracious heart and I believe some mighty power is preparing you for a +special great work. + + Yours very truly, + + MRS. J. R. B. + + St. Paul, Minn., May 16, 1911. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +THE HERMIT. + + No flocks that roam the valley free, + To slaughter I condemn, + Taught by the power that pities me, + I learn to pity them. + + --Goldsmith. + + * * * * * + +In religion, what damned error but some sober brow will bless it and +approve it with a text, hiding the grossness with fair ornament. + + --Shakespeare. + + * * * * * + +The untold suffering the human family sanctions through a wrong +conception of what is right, should make every Christian heart ache. + + --Platt. + + * * * * * + +When men go hunting (to kill) they call it sport but when the hunted +animal (perhaps wounded) turns to fight for its life, they call _that_ +ferocity.--Shaw. + + * * * * * + +Let all creatures live, as we desire to live. + + --Tolstoy. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +THE RELIGION OF BUDDHA. + +(An Idea from "Light of Asia.") + + 'Twere good to be humane + to the helpless beast; + Better than to deplore the + sins of the world + With priests who pray for + mankind, + And yet have no mercy + on God's dumb creatures-- + "They pray for mercy + Whilst they themselves + are merciless." + + --Kusel. + +[Illustration: Decorative Border] + + + + +Humanitarian Philosophy + +By Emil Edward Kusel + +No doubt some of the conscience-stricken readers will brand the +author of the sentiments herein as an extremist rather than a humane +enthusiast, but bethink yourself it is far better to be "an extremist" +on a logical, noble basis than to be inconsistent under false pretense. + + * * * * * + +The author is presenting truths from an absolutely rational standpoint +standing firmly on a real philosophical basis that cannot be overthrown +by a cyclone of protests from the "religious" flesh-eating faction. + +The idea is to show that man, when he gets "right with God," drifts +away from the customs of ancient times and reasons from the Golden +Rule foundation which is consistent with a higher life and makes him +religiously humane as well as "pious." + + * * * * * + +You may allow your quasi-religious principle to prevail against reason; +you may pout and cry against the Humanitarian's noble philosophy; you +may dream of the imps of hell awaiting his quietus; you may consult +your Bible to bless your inhumanity and yet mercy for our dumb +fellow-creatures is unselfish, pure and gentle, resultant from a proper +conception of man's superiority and his God. + +If a man's religion is pure and good and undefiled it would be wrong +to present facts to blast his belief (be it ever so superstitious); +however, when he insists upon inhumanity toward any sentient creature, +he should be severely criticised. + + * * * * * + +The scriptural passages that are well flavored with indecency and the +scriptural inhumanity written in God's name are not one whit more +inspired than are the objectionable lines of sensational literature. + + * * * * * + +The Bible has caused more bloodshed, more hatred; made more hypocrites +and caused more suffering than all else combined. It is a book +containing some lofty ideas and moral laws by good men, but the +many inconsistencies therein have caused superstition, imagination, +insanity, contemptibility and horrible cruelty that haunts the brain of +the honorable thinking masses. + + * * * * * + +It is proper to impress indelibly in the minds of the pretenders of the +several creeds "Thou shalt not kill;" neither shalt thou be accessory +in the killing by encouraging the slaughter through patronage. + +You may erect your massive temples and dedicate them to Jehovah; you +may pray to your heart's content and sing psalms until doomsday, yet +the earthquake, the cyclone, the tornado, the volcano overthrows the +synagogue, the cathedral, the church, the brothel and the saloon +without distinction. Evidently the god of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is +not omnipresent to protect an institution that stands for inhumanity. + + * * * * * + +One of the most noticeable inconsistencies ever presented to thinking +people is the representation of "Divine Love" portrayed under the title +"Peace," symbolized by a child leading the cow, the calf, the lion, +the leopard and the lamb. This taken from the Bible, is supposed to +represent, "And a little child shall lead them." + +Just think of symbolizing "Peace" with an innocent child leading +animals we actually murder! No doubt every religionist looks upon that +painting as a masterpiece--an inspiration. Yet most of them sanction +the slaughter of innocence by relishing a lamb chop or a veal cutlet. + +"And a little child shall lead them!" Whither? To the slaughter? Is not +that a miserable symbolization of "Divine Love" and "Peace?" + +Such inconsistency painted in the name of religion is an abomination +and deserves strenuous criticism. + +Not the least in the realm of inconsistency are the Jewish people who +fast on their day of atonement and break the Sabbath fifty-two times a +year by bartering. Now where is the consistency in such an atonement +when the Bible says explicitly: "Remember the Sabbath day and keep it +holy." + +Such incongruity is practised universally among the orthodox as well +as the reformed element. Like the Gentile, the Jewish religionist, +notwithstanding that he admits the horror of viewing the death throes +of a butchered animal, eats his flesh food "kosher" to satisfy his +palate rather than live up to the promptings of conscience. + + * * * * * + +Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism, and Christian Sciencism alike +disregard the sacredness of all animal kingdom, and yet, after +admitting the horror of the slaughter pen, they all encourage the +merciless killing under the cloak of the Bible. + + * * * * * + +"The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose" may well be applied to +the religionist who upholds the killing of our dumb fellow creatures. + + * * * * * + +The fact that the Bible encourages the murder of an animal proves it is +not entirely from the pen of holy men. + +The individual who professes religion and says it is right to slay and +eat when he can live without taking sentient life, on the vegetation +which nature so bountifully provides, is a liar, a murderer and a +hypocrite in his own higher conscience. + + * * * * * + +The so-called devout man wants to live and enjoy life, but he eats of +the innocent animal that has been battered to death by the blow of +the ax; he contends that a body which suffers pain was created for +slaughter to satisfy his beastly palate. Such a man is destitute of the +very essence of God-life be he minister, church-goer or layman. + + * * * * * + +Above all things the minister of the Gospel and the church attendant +should be kind and considerate toward all animal creation and should +construe the Scriptures and preach to prove the sacredness of +their Holy Bible. They should do God's will one earth as it is in +Heaven, absolutely abstaining from the fleshpots of Egypt, thereby +discouraging the blotting out of animal life, proving conclusively by +their lives that their God is just and kind and merciful. + + * * * * * + +The man who opposes the spilling of life blood of Nature's creatures is +on the higher plane of life. + +After searching for a mode of living through which we might find +perfect peace on earth and good will toward our fellow-men, we become +partially interested in the different religions, but we cannot +conscientiously close our eyes and believe a meat-eating, gormandizing +religionist is undefiled and passing on to spiritual perfection to +ultimately, at dissolution, burst into a glorious immortality. + + * * * * * + +Read the memorable Sermon on the Mount, supposed to have been delivered +by Christ Jesus, and note the humility, the tenderness, the love and +all therein that is grand and noble--then decide that such a meek +and lowly Nazarene could have eaten of the fleshpots or even have +sanctioned the killing of any living creature, and you deprive that +character of the very essence of divinity. + + * * * * * + +Flesh eating man's religion cannot emanate from a kindly heart because +with all his intellectuality and knowledge of right and wrong, his +animalistic tendencies are in excess. His horror for the slaughter pen +is conclusive and positive evidence that the higher consciousness is +dormant proving that carnivorous man hath no pre-eminence above the +beast. + +We fail to see any Christianity in the present-day Sunday churchianity, +and we positively know there is nothing sacred in the person upholding +the merciless slaughter of animals. Through all this we are made to +fully realize the inconsistency of nearly all religious professions. +We finally study the Laws of Nature, and we live from that time on +according to the dictates of conscience and reason, with some little +faith in addition. The first thought that impresses us is the inhuman +custom of taking life blood, knowing that every man, woman and child, +who possesses an atom of feeling, would shudder to look upon the +butchery of our dumb fellow-creatures, and we know if the horror of the +slaughter pen is admitted, it surely is a heinous crime to slaughter. +Then we begin to delve deep into the real scientific subjects of +real scientific men and really discover the real body builders are +proper food, proper mastication, proper air and proper breathing, and +occasional proper fasting, etc. We live the life as recommended by +these noble logicians and benefactors. Now we look from the heights +to the vast expanse of empty faith cure, cults and isms, creeds and +dogmas, and theories, and realize how narrow they all are by not +embodying humanitarianism and the laws of health and hygiene in their +teachings. + + * * * * * + +From a spiritual conception, it is just as reasonable to recommend +human cannibalism as the eating of butcher shop carrion. + +The 25th day of December is the day set aside to present gifts to our +sweethearts, wives and friends; the day Santa Claus brings toys to our +little ones to overflow their little hearts with gladness, but mainly +to commemorate the birth of one of the kindliest characters the world +has ever known. + +That holy day is horribly desecrated by the quasi-pious element +throughout our Christian land in the killing of countless numbers of +Nature's sentient creation. + +Thanksgiving Day, likewise set aside for a sacred purpose--to thank +God for the many blessings bestowed upon our great nation--is also +desecrated by religious people as well as by the laity. On the day we +should send our thanks to that invisible something (The First Great +Cause) we praise an imaginary personal deity by killing things to +satiate the craving of the palate. + + * * * * * + +The Bible condemns the eating of swine flesh (Deut. 14: 8; Is. 65: 4), +but what care the pharisee so long as he intends pleasing the palate +rather than obey the law of his God and conscience? + + * * * * * + +When we reach the Holy Mountain (consistent religion) we will abstain +from eating flesh food and have a heartfelt desire for all creatures to +live and enjoy life as we wish to live (Golden Rule.) + +Selfish civilized intellectual human takes his gun and repairs to the +forest and wantonly slaughters wild game. Perhaps he kills outright; +perhaps he wounds; perhaps the animal he has wounded is dying a slow, +painful death; perhaps he wounds or kills a mother and the young are +starving in nest or lair, and perhaps a professed Jew, Catholic, +Protestant or Christian Scientist is relishing the seasoned carrion +while the little ones are dying for the want of that mother's care. God +forbid the belief in such a god! + + * * * * * + +The huntsman, who wounds the wild game, goes to his couch and rests +peacefully while the poor dumb, wounded animal is dying in the forest, +suffering most excruciating pain. + +The deer, the dove, the quail and all of Nature's blood creation must +suffer with horrifying wounds at the hands of the thoughtless, cruel +hunter; upheld by so-called religious people who contend that such +inhumanity is permissible in God's sight. + +This very day thousands upon thousands of our dumb fellow-creatures +are suffering agonizing deaths caused through wounds inflicted by the +merciless hunter; and thousands upon thousands of professed Jews, +Catholics, Protestants and Christian Scientists worship the god that +tolerates such cruelty. Hypocrisy! Inconsistency! Shame! + +Sift mankind down to his noblest thought, and he must admit the life of +an animal is just as sacred as his own. + + * * * * * + +Knowing that all humanity feels the horrors of taking the life blood +of defenseless animals, you are compelled to condemn every religious +institution that does not embody within its creed the vegetarian diet. + + * * * * * + +Animals instinctively flee from danger, and suffer pain, which proves +the brute creation has a right to an appointed time upon the earth. +When man slaughters these helpless creatures under the selfish idea +that they were created for that purpose, he is destitute of divine +principle. + + * * * * * + +The almighty dollar is the god of the civilized people--mankind takes +the sacred life blood of God's creatures and barters the carcass in +exchange for money. Nearly all clergymen and the laity eat of the +murdered animal. Shame! + + * * * * * + +Let us be at least considerate and reason on the side of mercy. If your +religion sanctions the killing of innocent animals, well then, in the +name of all that is pure and good, lay aside your religion and get your +soul in tune with the Infinite, and then use your faculties of reason +to develop up to the highest ideal. + +Condemn the killing of innocent, defenseless animals, and do away with +the fleshpots of Egypt, and praise Deity for endowing you with reason +sufficient to realize the wrong of shedding life blood, and then sing +hosannas for the nobility of living according to the promptings of +higher conscience. + + * * * * * + +Do not think of the savory beef and mutton as it hangs in the market +place, but turn your mind and heart to the abattoirs and see the horror +of slaughter and then acknowledge that if God is not in the slaughter +house to hinder the killing of a dumb brute he is surely not in the +churches reserving crowns and halos for a sanctimonious element whose +palate takes precedence of principle. + + * * * * * + +The church folk encourage the killing of quadruped, fish and fowl and +then have the audacity to say grace at meal time, thanking God and +imploring Him to shower blessings upon them. + + * * * * * + +You believe in all that elevates man to the highest standard of +excellence and yet in the eating of a slaughtered animal you are an +accessory to the crime of murder--a crime that is far more morally +wrong and horrible than any so-called venial sin. + +The man who "believes" and has "faith" solely for his soul's safety +through fear rather than through love; the man who affiliates with +the church with mercenary motive; the man who testifies with lying +tongue to the virtue of his carnivorous unfeeling religion; the man who +shifts the blame of his cussedness to the mythical Satan; the man who +is weak and bent toward religious emotionalism; the man who sees the +mote in every eye but his own; the man who stands on the street corner +preaching hell and damnation, "fighting the devil," are the sorts of +men who decry that all beings have an equal right to live. + + * * * * * + +If perchance a fellow human becomes tired and weary of the vicissitudes +of this world and cancels his own captivity (suicide), we frantically +throw up our hands realizing the enormity of such a crime. + +His life is his own and he may do as he pleases; his sin of +self-destruction is between himself and his God, and yet we grieve +at such a sad exit. The very same man who shudders at the uncanny +thought of another's self-murder will uphold the killing of a dumb +brute to satiate the "human" palate. The animal does not want to die +yet the intelligent man who has a "merciful loving God" makes murder +permissible taking his authority from the book he calls "The Sacred +Bible." + +The Proverbs, the Psalms, the Sermon on the Mount, and many other +portions of the Good Book are beautiful, and no doubt the writers of +the select passages were inspired, but the evil spirit was surely +predominant in the man who depicted the Prince of Peace, in all his +humility, as a flesh eater. + + * * * * * + +A pitiful story to be told about a little girl whose father was +supposed to be very devout, and in whose residence the motto, + + "GODI S NOW HERE I NOUR HOME" + +adorned the wall, confusedly printed by her illiterate parent. + +One beautiful day, as all nature seemed in perfect harmony, the child +strolled to the barnyard where the hired man was killing the petted +calf preparatory to having a great feast in honor of the son, returning +from a western college of theology. + +A thought struck the child as she saw the life blood of an innocent +animal ebbing away, through a horrible knife wound. + +She hastened back to her father's home, sad but wiser, and +appropriately divided the motto on the wall: + + GOD IS NO WHERE IN OUR HOME. + +or as Daniel interpreted King Belshazzar's dream, the thinking child +weighed her papa in the balances and found him very much wanting in God +principle. + +Many so-called pious people throughout the land condemn theaters, +dancing, sociable drinking, prize-fighting, card playing, pastime +smoking, Sunday recreation, the innocent custom of Santa Claus and +the comic supplements of our Sunday newspapers, yet none of these +pleasures and pastimes could be half so abominable and sinful as the +encouragement of slaughter. + + * * * * * + +Every church member construes the Scriptures to please his own +individuality; sometimes he construes literally but when the passage +does not coincide with his appetite or manner of living he invariably +finds a figurative meaning. + + * * * * * + +We justify almost any sort of life by the Holy Bible, but we cannot +pull the blinds over the eyes of conscience. + + * * * * * + +The Women's Christian Temperance Union cannot influence towards +reformation effectively; the women of this religious order are trying +to defeat liquor and cigarette traffic, yet loth to realize under their +profession of Christianity, they are sinners greater than either the +unfortunate cigarette fiend or the drunkard, because they all admit +the horror of killing, at the same time relishing a mess of carrion, +thereby virtually encouraging the killer to kill more. + +The tiger pounces upon the giraffe and rides it to death, all the while +tearing the flesh from the bleeding animal; the puma pounces upon the +mountain goat; the hyena tears the entrails from its living prey and +the cat pounces upon the beautiful song bird and takes its innocent +life--where is your merciful, loving, personal God? + + * * * * * + +The religionist who lives on hallucination or believes that faith alone +"is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not +seen," and will not reason, is living in the dark ages still. + + * * * * * + +If one desires going into absolute truth concerning the killing of +helpless animals, he may justly condemn the wearing of leather shoes, +gloves, etc., all of which are worn contrary to Nature's Law. + + * * * * * + +The self-styled religious element send missionaries to foreign lands to +spread the gospel of love when they, themselves, as well as those they +send, are insufficiently human to recognize the brutality of slaughter. + + * * * * * + +Take man to the slaughter house to view the butchery, and then if he +contends God created helpless, dumb brutes for the slaughter pen, he is +positively heartless. If he shudders to witness the hideous butchery, +that proves conclusively that God is not omnipresent. + +If man wishes to disregard spirituality and remain an agnostic, infidel +or an atheist, that is his privilege and he may continue eating carrion +and encouraging slaughter, from the lower animal plane, but when he +steps over the threshold into religion and affiliates with the churches +and talks of man's pre-eminence above the beast he must of necessity +be in sympathy with his dumb fellow creatures and abstain from +flesh-eating to discourage all things not in harmony with God. (Higher +self). + + * * * * * + +Does it not hurt the innocent lamb when you cut its little throat? Does +it not hurt the little calf when you take its tender life? Does it not +hurt the cow when you wield the axe with tremendous force against its +forehead? Does it not hurt the sheep when in the agonies of death? Does +it not hurt when the goat pitifully gurgles the sound "Oh Lord," as its +life-blood is passing the butcher's knife? If pain does attend this +horrible inhumanity of man, what right then has he to establish for +himself a God in Heaven when in reality he hath no more feeling in his +miserable carcass than hath the cannibal of the uncivilized isles. + + * * * * * + +All things may be possible to God, but the idea of placing the breath +of life into our fellow-beings to be snuffed out by a superior +intellectual animal is the absurdest of all absurdities. + +Dancing, theater-going, rag-time music, and all other pleasures to +kill the monotony of daily routine, are under the ban of the churches. +We carry ourselves aloof from these awful (?) sins and walk in the +attitude of solemnity to impress Almighty God with our piety. We preach +against liquor and tobacco while we ourselves are addicted to the use +of tea and coffee (stimulants). We condemn everything we ourselves do +not care for and we jealously admonish others to be just like us. Now +if dancing, theater-going, rag-time music, etc., and the immoralities +of life are sins of venial proportion, of what colossal magnitude +must be the sin of taking life we cannot restore and how immeasurably +hellish are the churches that uphold the killing in the name of a +merciful God! + + * * * * * + +The dumb animals were created by Nature same as man (except that we +are a little above the animal in intellect), and have a divine right +to live out their respective allotted time same as man (minister, +church-goer or layman.) + + * * * * * + +The Buddhist who regards all animal life sacred is on the right path to +spirituality, while the carnivorous Jew, Catholic and Protestant are +drifting in the rut of dark age fantasy and fanaticism. + + + + +QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS + + +Q. Are you not a little bit radical on the subject of Humanitarianism? + +A. To you I may be "a little bit radical" because I oppose all +religions (yours inclusive) which make mankind selfish and unfeeling. + +Q. If the Bible teaches me to slay and eat have I not a right to eat +flesh? + +A. Yes, a legal right and your Bible right, but not a moral right. + +Q. Do not some people believe it is right to slay and eat lower animals? + +A. Yes, from their palate, but all honorable conscientious men see a +wrong in taking life. + +Q. Has not environment throughout one's life something to do with our +eating of flesh? + +A. Yes, but come out of it and be in line with a grander, nobler and +consistent life. Lay aside your palate and let your conscience rule. + +Q. Is not the devil in your philosophy? + +A. It seems so to you because it is an exposé of churchianity, proving +beyond question the nothingness of the flesh eating religionist's piety. + +Q. Suppose man lives in a country where he cannot find vegetarian food? + +A. Then he might be justified in eating flesh to preserve his life. + +Q. If there is no personal God, who created this world? + +A. It is a scientific proposition, and so acknowledged by all thinking +men. + +Q. Do church people get angry at your philosophy? + +A. Yes, sometimes, as when their conscience is seared by a hot iron. + +Q. Have not vegetables life? + +A. Not life which suffers an evident pain nor do they flee when you +threaten to pluck them. Such a question is invariably asked by a +carnivorous wiseacre. + +Q. Why are all Vegetarians lank, lean and skinny? + +A. Because you like the taste of meat and intend to continue eating it. + +Q. I know animals have fear and pain, but supposing God did place them +on earth for man to slay and eat, what then? + +A. "God" is no better then than your "devil." + +Q. What were animals created for? + +A. What were YOU created for? + +Q. What is your conception of God? + +A. Nature. Higher self--Conscience. + +Q. Do you not kill insects when you drink water; and do you not cripple +and trample harmless bugs to death with every step you take? + +A. Yes, but involuntarily and not with pre-meditation and not selfishly +to satisfy an inhuman desire or appetite. + +Q. Would you "swat" a fly or kill a flea or a snake? + +A. If a pest or venomous reptile disturbed my peace and quiet I would +be justified in protecting myself. + +Q. Is not the survival of the fittest a natural law; consequently being +superior I may slay and eat? + +A. That's your idea because the "fittest" is yourself--in your own +estimation and power; but there's no godliness in such a contention. +It is your selfish conclusion that might is right at the expense of +sentient life. + +Q. Do I not work hard and do I not know that I need meat to sustain me +in my manual labor? Do I not know what my system needs. + +A. Your system does not require food which must come from a murdered +animal! When you contend that you must subsist on flesh, you know not +whereof you speak. You are talking to uphold your inhuman appetite. + +Q. Where would medical research be were it not for vivisection +(torture) and killing animals for experiment in the interest of science? + +A. I do not know, but I do know scientific men have not a moral right +to torture and kill harmless, helpless animals. Experimenting in +surgery, etc., should be done on humans who believe in the advancement +of medical science at the expense of life. + +Q. Do you object to the infidel eating flesh food? + +A. I do not object to anyone eating flesh food--eat whatever you like, +but I do point out the wrong of taking life and I emphatically say the +religious institution upholding slaughter is a farce and a pharisaical +monument to a man-made deity. + +Q. Do you actually consider flesh eating the most abominable of sins? + +A. Yes, absolutely the most abominable. + +Q. What do you think of religious emotionalism and ecstasy? + +A. If from the mouth of a carnivorous worshipper it is sham and +pretense--a mockery. + +Q. Is not your feeling toward animals mawkish sentimentality? + +A. There is no such thing as mawkish sentimentality in decrying +inhumanity. + +Q. Do not the lower animals prey upon one another, and do not the big +fish eat the little fish? + +A. You profess to be above the inferior animals and you profess to have +a soul; you also have a Golden Rule supposed to have been handed down +by a kind and merciful Creator. + +Q. What shall we do with all the animals if we do not kill them? + +A. Is that why you eat flesh? + +Q. Do you really think carnivorous churchites are not of God? + +A. I don't _think_ it, I _know_ it _absolutely_, because I know it +is wrong to kill and I know they know it and I know they search the +Scriptures for "proof" to satisfy palate while Conscience rebels. + +Q. What do you think of a religionist who says, "I am living under a +new dispensation since Christ came and went, and I now eat anything the +Lord sets before me?" + +A. If he means he can eat at the expense of sentient life he is not a +Godly man; he is not living in harmony with the Golden Rule; he is not +living according to the promptings of a higher self, consequently the +God spirit is dormant. + +The church carnivora's favorite Bible quotations to justify his +inhumanity are invariably quoted from a petrified conscience and the +region of the palate. Here are several of the passages: + + "There is nothing from without a man, entering into him can defile + him; but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile + the man." + + * * * * * + + "For one believeth that he may eat all things; another, who is weak, + eateth herbs. But to him that esteemeth anything to be unclean to him + it is unclean." + + * * * * * + + "Now the spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some + shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and + doctrines of devils. Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their + conscience seared with a hot iron; commanding to abstain from meats, + which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them, which + believe and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and + nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving; for it is + sanctified by the word of God and prayer." + + * * * * * + + "In a trance I saw a vision; a certain vessel descend as it had been + a great sheet let down from heaven by four corners. I considered and + saw four-footed beasts of the earth and beasts and creeping things and + fowls of the air; and a voice said unto me, Arise, Peter, slay and + eat." + + + + +IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES + + +The Bible says: Be not among eaters of flesh. + +The Bible says: It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise than to +hear the hymns of fools. + +The Bible says: If an animal dieth of itself do not eat it but give it +to thy neighbor and let him eat thereof. + +The Bible says: Who knoweth that the spirit of man goeth upward and the +spirit of the beast goeth downward? + +The Bible says: Your stomachs are an open sepulchre. + +The Bible says: Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy. + +The Bible says: Prove all things and hold fast of that which is good. + +The Bible says: Do not be as the hypocrites are, testifying in public +places and yet living apart from God. + +The Bible says: Reason is too high for a fool. + +The Bible says: He that follows after mercy findeth life. + +The Bible says: The wise man's eyes are in his head (he reasons), but +the fool's eyes are neither here nor there, he walketh in darkness. + +The Bible says: When a man's ways are in harmony with higher +consciousness he maketh his enemies be at peace with him. + +The Bible says: The Spirit of God made Samson a murderer. + +The Bible says: The beasts of the field shall honor me. + +The Bible says: Fool thou art to believe all that the prophets have +said. + +The Bible says: God sent plagues to torment his people. + +The Bible says: Shed not innocent blood. + +The Bible says: Praise the Lord every living creature--the beasts of +the field, the birds of the air and earth, the fish of the waters and +all mankind. + +The Bible says: Thy will be done on earth as it is in Heaven. + +The Bible says: Thou art weighed in the balances and art found wanting. + +The Bible says: There are many false lords and false gods the people +are worshipping. + +The Bible says: Come now, let us reason together. + +The Bible says: Faith without works is dead. + +The Bible says: He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a human. + +The Bible says: Beast and man have one breath; so that man hath no +pre-eminence above the beast; as one dieth so dieth the other. + +The Bible says: Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter for thy +heart is not right in the sight of God. + +The Bible says: Every moving thing that liveth (grain, fruits, +vegetables, nuts, etc.) shall be food for you, but flesh with the life +thereof which is blood shall ye not eat. + +The Bible says: God blessed every creature. + +The Bible says: Behold I have given you every herb bearing seed, which +is upon the face of the earth and every tree, on the which is the fruit +of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for food. + +The Bible says: All that cry Lord, Lord, are not of God. + +The Bible says: They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my Holy Mountain. + +The Bible says: I am God, I change not. + +The Bible says: Do a little consistent heart cleaning so that the human +mind's eye shall be spiritual to see and segregate right from wrong. + +The Bible says: Christ taught love, leniency, forgiveness, tenderness +and mercy. + +The Bible says: Dead flies cause the apothecary's ointment to send +forth a stinking savour. + +Capital punishment or legalized murder is another miscarriage of +consistency; it does not dovetail into mercy and it does not blend into +the law that God has given man an allotted time upon the earth. What +right have twelve jurors to virtually cancel the life of a murderer? +Incarcerate the offender under a life sentence with proper food and +training, and ultimately that murderer's heart and soul might be purer +than Judge, jurors and all connected with the courts of justice. + + * * * * * + +If a criminal under excitement or cool pre-meditation takes the life +of a human being, the cool, considerate jurors, responsible for the +death penalty, are just as guilty of murder as the prisoner. + + * * * * * + +The butcher is rejected as a juror on a murder trial on the ground that +his business has hardened his heart, and yet the Judge of the Superior +Court, the sheriff and his deputies and the eligible jurors all eat of +the beef the butcher slaughters. + + * * * * * + +Despite the protests that may come to the surface in reading the +inspired, pointed truths, the fact should be reiterated that Justice, +Kindness and Mercy for every living creature is in the heart and soul +of the true religionist. + +The sand-blind carnivorous faith curist (who reads his Bible through +a pair of eye-glasses not made by God Almighty) tells us of a divine +healing power. + +We hear many testimonies from the lips of these people praising this +wonderful (?) curative agency, but when sensibly considered we know the +"power" removes only visionary ills. + +Imaginary tumors, etc., hypochondria and other nervous troubles readily +yield to this mythical physician, but no disease or defect in reality, +can be removed until we remove the physical cause. + +If we continue living regardless of natural health laws all the +"belief" and all the "faith" and all the "Blood" cannot offset the +inevitable result of continued disobedience. + +They sometimes speculate as to the stubbornness and apparent +incurability of an ailment and finally lay the blame to a spiritual +insufficiency. Ridiculous! + + * * * * * + +Mankind is filled with patriotism when a victorious war is ended, +forgetting the awful gloom pervading some poor mother's home. The +higher self should make us grieve with those that grieve rather than +be exultant at the loss or downfall of any nation. We should love all +nations and nationalities as we do our own, and be bound together by +inseparable bonds, realizing that we all must pass to the final tomb of +man on the same level. + +A bow of horse hair coming in contact with the gut strings of a violin +produces exquisite harmony that thrills every fibre of our being with +ecstasy. We can attribute the melody to the spirit of the deceased +animal appealing to the human heart. Strange that after life has +departed we can charm the muses with tones produced on a stringed +instrument. What human being has ever bequeathed to the world a +substance to awaken the emotions of our soul through concord of sweet +sounds like unto the gut of a deceased animal? Evidently there is more +harmony in the entrails of lower creatures than we find in the entire +carcass of religious civilized carnivorous man. + + * * * * * + +The scientist who upholds painful experimental surgery in the interest +of science should give over his own body for experiment instead of +encouraging the cruelties of vivisection. It hurts being "cut to +pieces," consequently the heartless scientific fellow, instead of +offering his own body for the dissecting table, tortures a poor +friendless dog or other animal. + +The horrible suffering thousands of helpless creatures have undergone +through the process of vivisection is heartrending. + +There should be stringent law against such inhumanity. + + + + +A DEVOUT (?) ADMONITION. + + + E. E. Kusel, + + Los Angeles, Cal. + +Sir: I read your "Humanitarian Philosophy" booklet and I take it as a +mass of devil talk. It is not in favor of the Holy Bible and it says it +is wrong to kill animals. This is crossing God's word. You say it says +swine meat is forbidden. That is the only true statement in your book +but that is the law for the Jews only. You say it says thou shalt not +kill; of course it does, and that has references to the human family +only. You say the religious man that does not shudder at the works of +a butcher is heartless and godless. You tell a falsehood there. I have +been a believer fifteen years and I know all animals were made for man. + +I can see the devil has a powerful influence over you as it had over +Voltaire, Paine, Ingersoll, Edison, Hubbard and other non-believers. +You infidels preach against God's Bible and will be burned in the +everlasting fires of hell for it. You will be glad to have a drop of +cold water in your suffering, but god will not have mercy--it will be +too late then. + +Hell is full of agnostics and infidels and non-believers burning and +suffering and I warn you to have a care as to what you say. + +The Catholics and Christian Scientists are as much of the devil's +doings as you are, so you'll have company if you do not repent of your +infidelity. + +You are adding to God's word and it is punishable by his wrath (Rev. +22:18.) + +Your book is a lot of lies and infidelity. + + N. S. W. + + Birmingham, Ala., Jan. 30, 1911. + + + + +A REPLY. + + + Mr. N. S. W., + + Birmingham, Ala. + +My dear sir: In reply to your letter of Jan. 30th, concerning my +"Humanitarian Philosophy," I wish to candidly tell you that I am not at +all afraid of your sort of god. The God I worship is not very likely +to materialize in a selfish fanatical subject, but always comes to the +surface in the heart and soul of honorable, conscientious thinking +men--men who either profess nothing and live according to custom or +in men who profess religion and uphold their God as kind, loving and +merciful. + +This latter man is an ethical vegetarian and will not accept the +cruelties and inconsistencies of the Bible but says "it is an error in +translation." + +As to the lower animals, one preying upon the other, the conscientious, +devout Bible believer presents the theory of his own freeing God +Almighty from the sinful responsibility. He divides Bible truth from +Bible error--he accepts the lofty and beautiful and holds fast to that +which is good. + +If you intend to preach a gospel of Love you will find it an utter +impossibility to do so if you do not live a Humanitarian life--a life +that forbids the killing of any thing that suffers pain, and fear of +death as you yourself may sometimes suffer. + +In conclusion I wish to impress you with the fact that your letter is +sufficient proof that you read the Bible in a haphazard style and know +not its contents. + +Every assertion, every quotation and every conclusion in my +"Humanitarian Philosophy," my dear sir, is absolutely true and +justified. + + Respectfully, + + E. E. KUSEL. + + + + +FROM THE W. A. T. L. + + +The tobacco smoking on street cars has been very much discussed in +your valuable paper recently. Now, I will suggest that all persons +who object to the poisonous effects of tobacco register a protest +every chance they get and spend some good money, as I am doing, to +back up their argument against the most deadly plant used by human +beings. There is no traffic so degrading in its influence and effect as +tobacco. It goes hand in hand with liquor, and when we stop the youth +of the land from using the weed, then the saloon will have no customers. + + G. L. R. + + Founder World's Anti-Tobacco League, + Los Angeles, Cal. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + + + + +THE "WORST" SIN. + + +The church element construe the Bible to blend into their own desires +and appetites and then in the name of their god (little g) they commit +every iniquity under the sun, the most abominable of which is the +eating of "a beef which has been battered in the head by the blow of an +ax or mutton which has had its throat cut from ear to ear." + +Get yourself in touch with the Infinite and you will see that the +taking of animal life for food is a greater sin than smoking, drinking +or satisfying animal desires. The three last named are only sinning +against the body but not commendable by any means, while the first is +the horrible sin of taking life. + +Carnivorous reader (church people included) think these lines over well +and then move thy tongue seven times before thou speakest of sin! + + E. E. KUSEL. + + Los Angeles, Cal. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + + + + +MAN AND BEAST. + + +What queer and wild notions religious faddists get into their heads. T. +J. W. wants us to quit killing cattle and hogs, etc., in fact all kinds +of animals and birds because God has put them on earth. I would like Mr +W. to tell us what would become of us if we followed his advice. Why, +the animals would crowd man off the earth in a short while. The farmer +could not raise any crops. Cattle, deer, hares and sheep would eat his +grain, the coyotes his chickens and the lions would eat him. + + C. V. Pasadena, Cal. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + + + + +VEGETARIAN'S REPLY. + + +If you please, Mr. V., I am not a "religious faddist." I am not +religious at all. I am a firm believer in the Golden Rule, applying it +to man and beast. + +In reply to your query, Mr. V. I will answer briefly: Self-preservation +is the first law of nature, so protect yourself against the presumed +invasion of tame and wild beasts, birds, etc., but do not presume we +have the right to take life of anything which endures pain or runs away +from impending danger unless occasion calls for it. + +My letter to the Herald, if you please, was for those who profess to be +godly and "in the kingdom." Religious people must be strictly humane +or they are minus the God character and their profession is either a +phantom or hypocrisy. + +Of course men like yourself, who are afraid of being crowded off the +earth, have a special self-given right to raise and cruelly slaughter +any living creature for eating. + +Meat eating will continue until the end of the world, no doubt, but the +Humanitarian will not eat it; it will be devoured by ungodly church +people and outsiders who like the flavor of flesh food, regardless of +the wrong of premeditated killing. + + T. J. W. + + Compton, Cal. + + (From Los Angeles Herald.) + + * * * * * + +Transcriber's Notes + +Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected. + +The repetition of the headings "QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS" on five and +"IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES" on three consecutive pages has been removed. + +Italics are represented thus _italics_. + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Humanitarian Philosophy, 4th Edition, by +Emil Edward Kusel + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK HUMANITARIAN PHILOSOPHY, 4TH *** + +***** This file should be named 48589-8.txt or 48589-8.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/4/8/5/8/48589/ + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Les Galloway and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at + www.gutenberg.org/license. + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 +North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email +contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the +Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + diff --git a/old/48589-8.zip b/old/48589-8.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..5aa1ae9 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-8.zip diff --git a/old/48589-h.zip b/old/48589-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0e1a097 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h.zip diff --git a/old/48589-h/48589-h.htm b/old/48589-h/48589-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..360e672 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/48589-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,2396 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of Humanitarian Philosophy, by Emil Edward Kusel. + </title> + <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" /> + <style type="text/css"> + +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +h1 +{ + margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em; + text-align: center; + font-size: x-large; + font-weight: normal; + line-height: 1.6; +} + + h2,h3{ + text-align: center; + clear: both; + } + +div.chapter {page-break-before: always;} + +p +{ + margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; +} + +.pi {margin-left: 40%;} + +hr { + width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: 33.5%; + margin-right: 33.5%; + clear: both; +} + +hr.tb {width: 45%; margin-left: 27.5%; margin-right: 27.5%;} +hr.chap {width: 65%; margin-left: 17.5%; margin-right: 17.5%;} +hr.small {width: 20%; margin-left: 40%; margin-right: 40%;} + + +.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ + /* visibility: hidden; */ + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; +} /* page numbers */ + + +.blockquote { + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +div.hangsection p {text-indent: -3em; margin-left: 3em;} + +.bbox {border: solid medium;} + +.center {text-align: center;} + +.right {text-align: right;} + + +.small {font-size: small;} + + +/* Images */ +.figcenter {margin: 1em auto; text-align: center;} +.caption {font-size: smaller; font-weight: bold;} + + +/* Poetry */ +.poem-container +{ + text-align: center; +} + +.poem +{ + display: inline-block; + text-align: left; +} + +.poem .stanza {margin: 1em auto;} + +.poem .verse +{ + text-indent: -3em; + padding-left: 3em; +} + +@media handheld +{ + .poem + { + display: block; + margin-left: 1em; + } +} + .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 1em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i6 {display: block; margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + .poem span.i16 {display: block; margin-left: 8em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + +/* Transcriber's notes */ +.transnote {background-color: #E6E6FA; + color: black; + font-size:smaller; + padding:0.5em; + margin-bottom:5em; + font-family:sans-serif, serif; } + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Humanitarian Philosophy, 4th Edition, by +Emil Edward Kusel + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most +other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions +whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of +the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at +www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have +to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook. + + + +Title: Humanitarian Philosophy, 4th Edition + +Author: Emil Edward Kusel + +Release Date: March 26, 2015 [EBook #48589] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK HUMANITARIAN PHILOSOPHY, 4TH *** + + + + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Les Galloway and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.) + + + + + + +</pre> + + + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 337px;"> +<img src="images/portrait.jpg" width="337" height="600" alt="" /> +<div class="caption">Emil Edward Kusel</div> +</div> + +<div class="bbox"> +<h1>Humanitarian + +Philosophy</h1> + + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p class="center">By</p> + +<p class="center">EMIL EDWARD KUSEL</p> + + +<p class="center">Extracts From His Letters</p> + +<p class="center">Fourth Edition</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p class="center">Thou shalt not kill.—Bible.</p> + +<p class="center">The individuality created by God is not carnivorous.—Mary Baker G. Eddy.</p> + +<p class="center">Kill not but have regard for life.—Buddha.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p class="center">Los Angeles, California</p> +<p class="center">1912</p> +</div> + +<hr class="tb" /> +<p class="center">Copyright 1912</p> + +<p class="center">by Emil Edward Kusel.</p> + +<p class="center">All rights reserved.</p> +<hr class="tb" /> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p class="center"> +Table of Contents<br /><br /> + +<a href="#NOTE">NOTE.</a><br /> +<a href="#KIND_WORDS">KIND WORDS.</a><br /> +<a href="#COMPLIMENTARY">COMPLIMENTARY.</a><br /> +<a href="#A_NOBLE_WOMAN">A NOBLE WOMAN.</a><br /> +<a href="#THE_HERMIT">THE HERMIT.</a><br /> +<a href="#Humanitarian_Philosophy">Humanitarian Philosophy</a><br /> +<a href="#QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS">QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS</a><br /> +<a href="#IN_AND_BETWEEN_THE_LINES">IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES</a><br /> +<a href="#A_DEVOUT_ADMONITION">A DEVOUT (?) ADMONITION.</a><br /> +<a href="#A_REPLY">A REPLY.</a><br /> +<a href="#FROM_THE_W_A_T_L">FROM THE W. A. T. L.</a><br /> +<a href="#THE_WORST_SIN">THE "WORST" SIN.</a><br /> +<a href="#MAN_AND_BEAST">MAN AND BEAST.</a><br /> +<a href="#VEGETARIANS_REPLY">VEGETARIAN'S REPLY.</a></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">1</span></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p01.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + + +<h3 id="NOTE">NOTE.</h3> + + +<p>When one meets with adversity and +all the world seems bitterly against +him or when one realizes the short duration +of life and hopes for a splendid +immortality, no doubt it is a consolation +for many to read the inspired and +lofty sentiments of the Bible.</p> + +<p>Therefore in writing the following +epigrams condemning inhumanity, I felt +confident that kindly people would see +that it is far from my motive to cast +reflection upon any individual inclined +to accept the comforting and humane +passages of either the Old or New Testament.</p> + +<p>I merely aimed to prove the inhuman +Mosaical law giving man the idea to +kill is not a law of a kind and loving +God. I also aimed to prove that the +flesh-eating religionist is an accessory +to a crime more bestial in the sight of +God than any other sin known to the +human family.</p> + +<p class="right"> +EMIL E. KUSEL. </p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p01.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">2</span></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p02.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + + +<h3><a name="KIND_WORDS" id="KIND_WORDS">KIND WORDS.</a></h3> + + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" has +taught me that God and conscience +are in unison. I would have liked to +condemn the writer for opening my eyes +to the truth, but the Lord is on his +side.</p> + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" is an eye +opener for the true religionist who +never before thought on the wickedness +of killing.</p> + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" is a blessing +for those who wish to live the +Christ life, although it will not appeal +to the religionist who is inhumanly +self-righteous.</p> + +<p>Since digesting "Humanitarian Philosophy" +I know a conscientious person +can read the stinging truth without a +selfish protest. The truth is mighty.</p> + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" at first +reading made me angry, but praise God, +the vegetarian's heart is in the right +place.</p> + +<p>"Humanitarian Philosophy" is an inspiration.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p02inv.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">3</span></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p03.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + + +<h3 id="COMPLIMENTARY">COMPLIMENTARY.</h3> + + +<p>Have always been very much interested +in the subjects of our able ministers, +but since receiving a copy of +Mr. Kusel's philosophy against flesh +eating I am a convert to the doctrine +that neither minister nor congregation +can be "a child of God" until they are +vegetarians.</p> + +<p>It is impossible for me to now believe +otherwise on account of the tremendous +cruelty and horror of taking the life of +animals.</p> + +<p>I never thought of the truth as Mr. +Kusel puts it forth, and I am surprised +to think preachers never preached +against blood food. I also thought it +would be meet and proper to criticise +shoe, glove and belt wearing, but the +leather using is a secondary proposition; +the animal is first killed for food +purposes and secondarily to avoid the +waste we may utilize the hide, and still +we should discourage that argument.</p> + +<p>Mr. Kusel is defending God Almighty +nobly in his "Humanitarian Philosophy" +and has given the church doctrines +a slap no man can gainsay.</p> + +<p>When we favor meat eating we favor +killing, and when we favor killing in +the name of God we know we are liars +and murderers, for God is kind and loving, +and surely opposes the taking of +life. Let churches preach the murder +of animals, but pray do not say wickedness +(killing) is God's will. The +world needs more conscientious men +like Mr. Kusel to protect God Almighty +from defamation.</p> + +<p class="right"> +T. J. W. </p> +<p class="center"> +(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p03inv.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">4</span></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p04.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + + +<h3 id="A_NOBLE_WOMAN">A NOBLE WOMAN.</h3> + + +<p> +Mr. Emil Edward Kusel,<br /> +<br /> + Los Angeles, Cal.<br /> +</p> + +<p>Dear Mr. Kusel:—I have been wonderfully +guided and blessed by reading +"Humanitarian Philosophy" as it is +truly an inspired work that should be +thought upon by all religious people.</p> + +<p>The beauty of your blessed reasoning +is that you cast all biblical chaff +to the four winds and look to God in +the true light of love and mercy.</p> + +<p>Yes indeed, you show the inconsistency +of a religion that gives us an +evil right to kill things while every +last one of us, without exception, cling +to life with the tenacity of a coward.</p> + +<p>You fully convince me that false +prophets had a hand in writing the +Scriptures because God in His Infinite +Love could not have created the dear +innocent lamb our Savior carried in his +bosom to be killed nor could he have +created the sweet little baby calf to be +slain and eaten by human beings. You +convince me that God is not in the +slaughter-house, neither in the midst +of those who patronize the butcher any +more than He is in the heart of the +wild beast of prey.</p> + +<p>I do believe in a personal God as I +could not live without hope for a +blissful future life beyond the grave. +This pilgrimage, to me, without religion +would make this world a very +dreary and lonesome place.</p> + +<p>Heretofore I lived a carnivorous life, +always wondering why God created +poor sentient things for human food +but now, thank God, I realize, without +humanitarianism spirituality is not a +reality and I applaud such men as Mr. +Kusel for standing out boldly on a +grand philosophy that puts all church +doctrines to shame and presents a religion +consistent with reason.</p> + +<p>Your trend of thought, my dear +brother, is indeed marvelous from a +gracious heart and I believe some +mighty power is preparing you for a +special great work.</p> + +<p class="pi"> +Yours very truly,</p> +<p class="right"> +MRS. J. R. B. </p> +<p> +St. Paul, Minn., May 16, 1911.</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p04.jpg" alt="Decorative border" /> +</div> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">5</span></p> + + +<h3 id="THE_HERMIT">THE HERMIT.</h3> +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">No flocks that roam the valley free,<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i2">To slaughter I condemn,<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">Taught by the power that pities me,<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i2">I learn to pity them.<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i16">—Goldsmith.</span></div> +</div></div></div> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>In religion, what damned error but some +sober brow will bless it and approve it with a +text, hiding the grossness with fair ornament.</p> + +<p class="right"> +—Shakespeare. +</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The untold suffering the human family sanctions +through a wrong conception of what is +right, should make every Christian heart ache.</p> + +<p class="right"> +—Platt. +</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>When men go hunting (to kill) they call it +sport but when the hunted animal (perhaps +wounded) turns to fight for its life, they call +<em>that</em> ferocity.—Shaw.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Let all creatures live, as we desire to live.</p> + +<p class="right"> +—Tolstoy. +</p> +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">6</span></p> + + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p06.jpg" alt="Decorative Border" /> +</div> + + +<h3 id="THE_RELIGION_OF_BUDDHA">THE RELIGION OF BUDDHA.</h3> + +<p class="center">(An Idea from "Light of Asia.")</p> +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">'Twere good to be humane<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">to the helpless beast;<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">Better than to deplore the<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">sins of the world<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">With priests who pray for<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">mankind,<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">And yet have no mercy<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">on God's dumb creatures—<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">"They pray for mercy<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i0">Whilst they themselves<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i6">are merciless."<br /></span></div> +<div class="verse"><span class="i16">—Kusel.</span></div> +</div></div></div> + + + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 450px;"> +<img src="images/decos_p06.jpg" alt="Decorative Border" /> +</div> + + +<hr class="chap" /><div class="chapter" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">7</span></p> + + + + +<h2 id="Humanitarian_Philosophy">Humanitarian Philosophy</h2> + +<p class="center">By Emil Edward Kusel</p> + +<p>No doubt some of the conscience-stricken +readers will brand the author of the sentiments +herein as an extremist rather than a humane enthusiast, +but bethink yourself it is far better to +be "an extremist" on a logical, noble basis than +to be inconsistent under false pretense.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The author is presenting truths from an absolutely +rational standpoint standing firmly on a +real philosophical basis that cannot be overthrown +by a cyclone of protests from the "religious" +flesh-eating faction.</p> + +<p>The idea is to show that man, when he gets +"right with God," drifts away from the customs +of ancient times and reasons from the +Golden Rule foundation which is consistent +with a higher life and makes him religiously humane +as well as "pious."</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>You may allow your quasi-religious principle to +prevail against reason; you may pout and cry +against the Humanitarian's noble philosophy; +you may dream of the imps of hell awaiting his +quietus; you may consult your Bible to bless +your inhumanity and yet mercy for our dumb +fellow-creatures is unselfish, pure and gentle, +resultant from a proper conception of man's superiority +and his God.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">8</span></p> + +<p>If a man's religion is pure and good and undefiled +it would be wrong to present facts to +blast his belief (be it ever so superstitious); +however, when he insists upon inhumanity toward +any sentient creature, he should be severely +criticised.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The scriptural passages that are well flavored +with indecency and the scriptural inhumanity +written in God's name are not one whit more +inspired than are the objectionable lines of sensational +literature.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The Bible has caused more bloodshed, more +hatred; made more hypocrites and caused more +suffering than all else combined. It is a book +containing some lofty ideas and moral laws by +good men, but the many inconsistencies therein +have caused superstition, imagination, insanity, +contemptibility and horrible cruelty that haunts +the brain of the honorable thinking masses.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>It is proper to impress indelibly in the minds +of the pretenders of the several creeds "Thou +shalt not kill;" neither shalt thou be accessory +in the killing by encouraging the slaughter +through patronage.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">9</span></p> + +<p>You may erect your massive temples and +dedicate them to Jehovah; you may pray to your +heart's content and sing psalms until doomsday, +yet the earthquake, the cyclone, the tornado, +the volcano overthrows the synagogue, the cathedral, +the church, the brothel and the saloon +without distinction. Evidently the god of Abraham, +Isaac and Jacob is not omnipresent to protect +an institution that stands for inhumanity.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>One of the most noticeable inconsistencies +ever presented to thinking people is the representation +of "Divine Love" portrayed under the +title "Peace," symbolized by a child leading +the cow, the calf, the lion, the leopard and the +lamb. This taken from the Bible, is supposed +to represent, "And a little child shall lead +them."</p> + +<p>Just think of symbolizing "Peace" with an +innocent child leading animals we actually murder! +No doubt every religionist looks upon +that painting as a masterpiece—an inspiration. +Yet most of them sanction the slaughter of innocence +by relishing a lamb chop or a veal +cutlet.</p> + +<p>"And a little child shall lead them!" +Whither? To the slaughter? Is not that a +miserable symbolization of "Divine Love" and +"Peace?"</p> + +<p>Such inconsistency painted in the name of religion +is an abomination and deserves strenuous +criticism.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">10</span></p> + +<p>Not the least in the realm of inconsistency +are the Jewish people who fast on their day of +atonement and break the Sabbath fifty-two times +a year by bartering. Now where is the consistency +in such an atonement when the Bible +says explicitly: "Remember the Sabbath day +and keep it holy."</p> + +<p>Such incongruity is practised universally +among the orthodox as well as the reformed +element. Like the Gentile, the Jewish religionist, +notwithstanding that he admits the horror +of viewing the death throes of a butchered animal, +eats his flesh food "kosher" to satisfy his +palate rather than live up to the promptings +of conscience.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism, and +Christian Sciencism alike disregard the sacredness +of all animal kingdom, and yet, after admitting +the horror of the slaughter pen, they all encourage +the merciless killing under the cloak +of the Bible.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>"The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose" +may well be applied to the religionist who +upholds the killing of our dumb fellow creatures.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The fact that the Bible encourages the murder +of an animal proves it is not entirely from +the pen of holy men.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">11</span></p> + +<p>The individual who professes religion and +says it is right to slay and eat when he can live +without taking sentient life, on the vegetation +which nature so bountifully provides, is a liar, +a murderer and a hypocrite in his own higher +conscience.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The so-called devout man wants to live and +enjoy life, but he eats of the innocent animal +that has been battered to death by the blow of +the ax; he contends that a body which suffers +pain was created for slaughter to satisfy his +beastly palate. Such a man is destitute of the +very essence of God-life be he minister, church-goer +or layman.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Above all things the minister of the Gospel +and the church attendant should be kind and +considerate toward all animal creation and +should construe the Scriptures and preach to +prove the sacredness of their Holy Bible. They +should do God's will one earth as it is in +Heaven, absolutely abstaining from the fleshpots +of Egypt, thereby discouraging the blotting +out of animal life, proving conclusively +by their lives that their God is just and kind +and merciful.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The man who opposes the spilling of life +blood of Nature's creatures is on the higher +plane of life.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">12</span></p> + +<p>After searching for a mode of living through +which we might find perfect peace on earth +and good will toward our fellow-men, we become +partially interested in the different religions, +but we cannot conscientiously close our +eyes and believe a meat-eating, gormandizing +religionist is undefiled and passing on to spiritual +perfection to ultimately, at dissolution, burst +into a glorious immortality.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Read the memorable Sermon on the Mount, +supposed to have been delivered by Christ Jesus, +and note the humility, the tenderness, the love +and all therein that is grand and noble—then +decide that such a meek and lowly Nazarene +could have eaten of the fleshpots or even have +sanctioned the killing of any living creature, and +you deprive that character of the very essence +of divinity.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Flesh eating man's religion cannot emanate +from a kindly heart because with all his intellectuality +and knowledge of right and wrong, +his animalistic tendencies are in excess. His +horror for the slaughter pen is conclusive and +positive evidence that the higher consciousness +is dormant proving that carnivorous man hath +no pre-eminence above the beast.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">13</span></p> + +<p>We fail to see any Christianity in the present-day +Sunday churchianity, and we positively +know there is nothing sacred in the person upholding +the merciless slaughter of animals. +Through all this we are made to fully realize +the inconsistency of nearly all religious professions. +We finally study the Laws of Nature, +and we live from that time on according to the +dictates of conscience and reason, with some +little faith in addition. The first thought that +impresses us is the inhuman custom of taking +life blood, knowing that every man, woman +and child, who possesses an atom of feeling, +would shudder to look upon the butchery of +our dumb fellow-creatures, and we know if the +horror of the slaughter pen is admitted, it surely +is a heinous crime to slaughter. Then we begin to +delve deep into the real scientific subjects of real +scientific men and really discover the real body +builders are proper food, proper mastication, +proper air and proper breathing, and occasional +proper fasting, etc. We live the life as recommended +by these noble logicians and benefactors. +Now we look from the heights to the +vast expanse of empty faith cure, cults and isms, +creeds and dogmas, and theories, and realize +how narrow they all are by not embodying humanitarianism +and the laws of health and hygiene +in their teachings.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>From a spiritual conception, it is just as +reasonable to recommend human cannibalism as +the eating of butcher shop carrion.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">14</span></p> + +<p>The 25th day of December is the day set +aside to present gifts to our sweethearts, wives +and friends; the day Santa Claus brings toys +to our little ones to overflow their little hearts +with gladness, but mainly to commemorate the +birth of one of the kindliest characters the world +has ever known.</p> + +<p>That holy day is horribly desecrated by the +quasi-pious element throughout our Christian +land in the killing of countless numbers of Nature's +sentient creation.</p> + +<p>Thanksgiving Day, likewise set aside for a +sacred purpose—to thank God for the many +blessings bestowed upon our great nation—is also +desecrated by religious people as well as by the +laity. On the day we should send our thanks +to that invisible something (The First Great +Cause) we praise an imaginary personal deity +by killing things to satiate the craving of the +palate.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The Bible condemns the eating of swine flesh +(Deut. 14: 8; Is. 65: 4), but what care the +pharisee so long as he intends pleasing the palate +rather than obey the law of his God and conscience?</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>When we reach the Holy Mountain (consistent +religion) we will abstain from eating +flesh food and have a heartfelt desire for all +creatures to live and enjoy life as we wish to +live (Golden Rule.)</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">15</span></p> + +<p>Selfish civilized intellectual human takes his +gun and repairs to the forest and wantonly +slaughters wild game. Perhaps he kills outright; +perhaps he wounds; perhaps the animal +he has wounded is dying a slow, painful death; +perhaps he wounds or kills a mother and the +young are starving in nest or lair, and perhaps +a professed Jew, Catholic, Protestant or Christian +Scientist is relishing the seasoned carrion +while the little ones are dying for the want of +that mother's care. God forbid the belief in +such a god!</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The huntsman, who wounds the wild game, +goes to his couch and rests peacefully while +the poor dumb, wounded animal is dying in +the forest, suffering most excruciating pain.</p> + +<p>The deer, the dove, the quail and all of +Nature's blood creation must suffer with horrifying +wounds at the hands of the thoughtless, +cruel hunter; upheld by so-called religious people +who contend that such inhumanity is permissible +in God's sight.</p> + +<p>This very day thousands upon thousands of +our dumb fellow-creatures are suffering agonizing +deaths caused through wounds inflicted +by the merciless hunter; and thousands upon +thousands of professed Jews, Catholics, Protestants +and Christian Scientists worship the god +that tolerates such cruelty. Hypocrisy! Inconsistency! +Shame!</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">16</span></p> + +<p>Sift mankind down to his noblest thought, +and he must admit the life of an animal is just +as sacred as his own.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Knowing that all humanity feels the horrors +of taking the life blood of defenseless animals, +you are compelled to condemn every religious +institution that does not embody within its creed +the vegetarian diet.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Animals instinctively flee from danger, and +suffer pain, which proves the brute creation has +a right to an appointed time upon the earth. +When man slaughters these helpless creatures +under the selfish idea that they were created for +that purpose, he is destitute of divine principle.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The almighty dollar is the god of the civilized +people—mankind takes the sacred life +blood of God's creatures and barters the carcass +in exchange for money. Nearly all clergymen +and the laity eat of the murdered animal. +Shame!</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Let us be at least considerate and reason on +the side of mercy. If your religion sanctions +the killing of innocent animals, well then, in the +name of all that is pure and good, lay aside +your religion and get your soul in tune with the +Infinite, and then use your faculties of reason +to develop up to the highest ideal.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">17</span></p> + +<p>Condemn the killing of innocent, defenseless +animals, and do away with the fleshpots of +Egypt, and praise Deity for endowing you with +reason sufficient to realize the wrong of shedding +life blood, and then sing hosannas for the +nobility of living according to the promptings of +higher conscience.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Do not think of the savory beef and mutton +as it hangs in the market place, but turn your +mind and heart to the abattoirs and see the +horror of slaughter and then acknowledge that +if God is not in the slaughter house to hinder +the killing of a dumb brute he is surely not in +the churches reserving crowns and halos for +a sanctimonious element whose palate takes +precedence of principle.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The church folk encourage the killing of +quadruped, fish and fowl and then have the +audacity to say grace at meal time, thanking +God and imploring Him to shower blessings +upon them.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>You believe in all that elevates man to the +highest standard of excellence and yet in the +eating of a slaughtered animal you are an accessory +to the crime of murder—a crime that +is far more morally wrong and horrible than +any so-called venial sin.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">18</span></p> + +<p>The man who "believes" and has "faith" +solely for his soul's safety through fear rather +than through love; the man who affiliates with +the church with mercenary motive; the man who +testifies with lying tongue to the virtue of his +carnivorous unfeeling religion; the man who +shifts the blame of his cussedness to the mythical +Satan; the man who is weak and bent toward +religious emotionalism; the man who sees +the mote in every eye but his own; the man +who stands on the street corner preaching hell +and damnation, "fighting the devil," are the +sorts of men who decry that all beings have an +equal right to live.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>If perchance a fellow human becomes tired +and weary of the vicissitudes of this world and +cancels his own captivity (suicide), we frantically +throw up our hands realizing the enormity +of such a crime.</p> + +<p>His life is his own and he may do as he +pleases; his sin of self-destruction is between himself +and his God, and yet we grieve at such a sad +exit. The very same man who shudders at the +uncanny thought of another's self-murder will +uphold the killing of a dumb brute to satiate +the "human" palate. The animal does not want +to die yet the intelligent man who has a "merciful +loving God" makes murder permissible taking +his authority from the book he calls "The +Sacred Bible."</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">19</span></p> + +<p>The Proverbs, the Psalms, the Sermon on +the Mount, and many other portions of the +Good Book are beautiful, and no doubt the +writers of the select passages were inspired, +but the evil spirit was surely predominant in the +man who depicted the Prince of Peace, in all +his humility, as a flesh eater.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>A pitiful story to be told about a little girl +whose father was supposed to be very devout, +and in whose residence the motto,</p> + +<p class="center">"GODI S NOW HERE I NOUR HOME"</p> + +<p>adorned the wall, confusedly printed by her +illiterate parent.</p> + +<p>One beautiful day, as all nature seemed in +perfect harmony, the child strolled to the barnyard +where the hired man was killing the petted +calf preparatory to having a great feast in honor +of the son, returning from a western college of +theology.</p> + +<p>A thought struck the child as she saw the +life blood of an innocent animal ebbing away, +through a horrible knife wound.</p> + +<p>She hastened back to her father's home, sad +but wiser, and appropriately divided the motto +on the wall:</p> + +<p class="center">GOD IS NO WHERE IN OUR HOME.</p> + +<p>or as Daniel interpreted King Belshazzar's +dream, the thinking child weighed her +papa in the balances and found him very much +wanting in God principle.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">20</span></p> + +<p>Many so-called pious people throughout the +land condemn theaters, dancing, sociable drinking, +prize-fighting, card playing, pastime +smoking, Sunday recreation, the innocent custom +of Santa Claus and the comic supplements +of our Sunday newspapers, yet none of these +pleasures and pastimes could be half so abominable +and sinful as the encouragement of +slaughter.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Every church member construes the Scriptures +to please his own individuality; sometimes he +construes literally but when the passage does +not coincide with his appetite or manner of +living he invariably finds a figurative meaning.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>We justify almost any sort of life by the +Holy Bible, but we cannot pull the blinds over +the eyes of conscience.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The Women's Christian Temperance Union +cannot influence towards reformation effectively; +the women of this religious order are trying +to defeat liquor and cigarette traffic, yet loth +to realize under their profession of Christianity, +they are sinners greater than either the unfortunate +cigarette fiend or the drunkard, because +they all admit the horror of killing, at the same +time relishing a mess of carrion, thereby virtually +encouraging the killer to kill more.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">21</span></p> + +<p>The tiger pounces upon the giraffe and rides +it to death, all the while tearing the flesh from +the bleeding animal; the puma pounces upon the +mountain goat; the hyena tears the entrails from +its living prey and the cat pounces upon the +beautiful song bird and takes its innocent life—where +is your merciful, loving, personal God?</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The religionist who lives on hallucination or +believes that faith alone "is the substance of +things hoped for, the evidence of things not +seen," and will not reason, is living in the dark +ages still.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>If one desires going into absolute truth concerning +the killing of helpless animals, he +may justly condemn the wearing of leather +shoes, gloves, etc., all of which are worn contrary +to Nature's Law.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The self-styled religious element send missionaries +to foreign lands to spread the gospel +of love when they, themselves, as well as those +they send, are insufficiently human to recognize +the brutality of slaughter.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Take man to the slaughter house to view +the butchery, and then if he contends God +created helpless, dumb brutes for the slaughter +pen, he is positively heartless. If he shudders +to witness the hideous butchery, that proves +conclusively that God is not omnipresent.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">22</span></p> + +<p>If man wishes to disregard spirituality and +remain an agnostic, infidel or an atheist, that is +his privilege and he may continue eating carrion +and encouraging slaughter, from the lower animal +plane, but when he steps over the threshold +into religion and affiliates with the churches and +talks of man's pre-eminence above the beast he +must of necessity be in sympathy with his dumb +fellow creatures and abstain from flesh-eating +to discourage all things not in harmony with +God. (Higher self).</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Does it not hurt the innocent lamb when +you cut its little throat? Does it not hurt the +little calf when you take its tender life? Does +it not hurt the cow when you wield the axe with +tremendous force against its forehead? Does it +not hurt the sheep when in the agonies of death? +Does it not hurt when the goat pitifully gurgles +the sound "Oh Lord," as its life-blood is passing +the butcher's knife? If pain does attend +this horrible inhumanity of man, what right +then has he to establish for himself a God in +Heaven when in reality he hath no more feeling +in his miserable carcass than hath the cannibal +of the uncivilized isles.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>All things may be possible to God, but the +idea of placing the breath of life into our fellow-beings +to be snuffed out by a superior intellectual +animal is the absurdest of all absurdities.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">23</span></p> + +<p>Dancing, theater-going, rag-time music, and +all other pleasures to kill the monotony of daily +routine, are under the ban of the churches. We +carry ourselves aloof from these awful (?) sins +and walk in the attitude of solemnity to impress +Almighty God with our piety. We preach +against liquor and tobacco while we ourselves +are addicted to the use of tea and coffee (stimulants). +We condemn everything we ourselves +do not care for and we jealously admonish others +to be just like us. Now if dancing, theater-going, +rag-time music, etc., and the immoralities +of life are sins of venial proportion, of what colossal +magnitude must be the sin of taking life +we cannot restore and how immeasurably hellish +are the churches that uphold the killing in the +name of a merciful God!</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The dumb animals were created by Nature +same as man (except that we are a little above +the animal in intellect), and have a divine right +to live out their respective allotted time same as +man (minister, church-goer or layman.)</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The Buddhist who regards all animal life sacred +is on the right path to spirituality, while the +carnivorous Jew, Catholic and Protestant are +drifting in the rut of dark age fantasy and +fanaticism.</p> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">24</span></p> + + + + +<h3 id="QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS">QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS</h3> + + +<p>Q. Are you not a little bit radical on the +subject of Humanitarianism?</p> + +<p>A. To you I may be "a little bit radical" +because I oppose all religions (yours inclusive) +which make mankind selfish and unfeeling.</p> + +<p>Q. If the Bible teaches me to slay and eat +have I not a right to eat flesh?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, a legal right and your Bible right, +but not a moral right.</p> + +<p>Q. Do not some people believe it is right +to slay and eat lower animals?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, from their palate, but all honorable +conscientious men see a wrong in taking +life.</p> + +<p>Q. Has not environment throughout one's +life something to do with our eating of flesh?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, but come out of it and be in line +with a grander, nobler and consistent life. Lay +aside your palate and let your conscience rule.</p> + +<p>Q. Is not the devil in your philosophy?</p> + +<p>A. It seems so to you because it is an exposé +of churchianity, proving beyond question the +nothingness of the flesh eating religionist's piety.</p> + +<p>Q. Suppose man lives in a country where +he cannot find vegetarian food?</p> + +<p>A. Then he might be justified in eating +flesh to preserve his life.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">25</span></p> + +<p>Q. If there is no personal God, who created +this world?</p> + +<p>A. It is a scientific proposition, and +so acknowledged by all thinking men.</p> + +<p>Q. Do church people get angry at your +philosophy?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, sometimes, as when their conscience +is seared by a hot iron.</p> + +<p>Q. Have not vegetables life?</p> + +<p>A. Not life which suffers an evident pain +nor do they flee when you threaten to pluck +them. Such a question is invariably asked by a +carnivorous wiseacre.</p> + +<p>Q. Why are all Vegetarians lank, lean and +skinny?</p> + +<p>A. Because you like the taste of meat and +intend to continue eating it.</p> + +<p>Q. I know animals have fear and pain, but +supposing God did place them on earth for man +to slay and eat, what then?</p> + +<p>A. "God" is no better then than your +"devil."</p> + +<p>Q. What were animals created for?</p> + +<p>A. What were YOU created for?</p> + +<p>Q. What is your conception of God?</p> + +<p>A. Nature. Higher self—Conscience.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">26</span></p> + +<p>Q. Do you not kill insects when you drink +water; and do you not cripple and trample +harmless bugs to death with every step you take?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, but involuntarily and not with premeditation +and not selfishly to satisfy an inhuman +desire or appetite.</p> + +<p>Q. Would you "swat" a fly or kill a flea +or a snake?</p> + +<p>A. If a pest or venomous reptile disturbed +my peace and quiet I would be justified in protecting +myself.</p> + +<p>Q. Is not the survival of the fittest a natural +law; consequently being superior I may slay and +eat?</p> + +<p>A. That's your idea because the "fittest" is +yourself—in your own estimation and power; but +there's no godliness in such a contention. It is +your selfish conclusion that might is right at the +expense of sentient life.</p> + +<p>Q. Do I not work hard and do I not know +that I need meat to sustain me in my manual +labor? Do I not know what my system needs.</p> + +<p>A. Your system does not require food which +must come from a murdered animal! When you +contend that you must subsist on flesh, you know +not whereof you speak. You are talking to uphold +your inhuman appetite.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">27</span></p> + +<p>Q. Where would medical research be were +it not for vivisection (torture) and killing animals +for experiment in the interest of science?</p> + +<p>A. I do not know, but I do know scientific +men have not a moral right to torture and kill +harmless, helpless animals. Experimenting in +surgery, etc., should be done on humans who believe +in the advancement of medical science at +the expense of life.</p> + +<p>Q. Do you object to the infidel eating flesh +food?</p> + +<p>A. I do not object to anyone eating flesh +food—eat whatever you like, but I do point +out the wrong of taking life and I emphatically +say the religious institution upholding slaughter +is a farce and a pharisaical monument to a man-made +deity.</p> + +<p>Q. Do you actually consider flesh eating +the most abominable of sins?</p> + +<p>A. Yes, absolutely the most abominable.</p> + +<p>Q. What do you think of religious emotionalism +and ecstasy?</p> + +<p>A. If from the mouth of a carnivorous +worshipper it is sham and pretense—a mockery.</p> + +<p>Q. Is not your feeling toward animals +mawkish sentimentality?</p> + +<p>A. There is no such thing as mawkish sentimentality +in decrying inhumanity.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">28</span></p> + +<p>Q. Do not the lower animals prey upon +one another, and do not the big fish eat the little +fish?</p> + +<p>A. You profess to be above the inferior +animals and you profess to have a soul; you also +have a Golden Rule supposed to have been +handed down by a kind and merciful Creator.</p> + +<p>Q. What shall we do with all the animals +if we do not kill them?</p> + +<p>A. Is that why you eat flesh?</p> + +<p>Q. Do you really think carnivorous +churchites are not of God?</p> + +<p>A. I don't <em>think</em> it, I <em>know</em> it <em>absolutely</em>, because +I know it is wrong to kill and I know they +know it and I know they search the Scriptures +for "proof" to satisfy palate while Conscience +rebels.</p> + +<p>Q. What do you think of a religionist who +says, "I am living under a new dispensation +since Christ came and went, and I now eat anything +the Lord sets before me?"</p> + +<p>A. If he means he can eat at the expense +of sentient life he is not a Godly man; he is +not living in harmony with the Golden Rule; +he is not living according to the promptings of +a higher self, consequently the God spirit is dormant.</p> + +<hr class="chap" /> +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">29</span></p> + +<p>The church carnivora's favorite Bible quotations +to justify his inhumanity are invariably +quoted from a petrified conscience and the region +of the palate. Here are several of the +passages:</p> + +<blockquote> + +<p>"There is nothing from without a +man, entering into him can defile him; +but the things which come out of him, +those are they that defile the man."</p></blockquote> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<blockquote> + +<p>"For one believeth that he may eat all +things; another, who is weak, eateth +herbs. But to him that esteemeth anything +to be unclean to him it is unclean."</p></blockquote> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<blockquote> + +<p>"Now the spirit speaketh expressly, +that in the latter times some shall depart +from the faith, giving heed to seducing +spirits and doctrines of devils. +Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their +conscience seared with a hot iron; commanding +to abstain from meats, which +God hath created to be received with +thanksgiving of them, which believe and +know the truth. For every creature of +God is good, and nothing to be refused, +if it be received with thanksgiving; for +it is sanctified by the word of God and +prayer."</p></blockquote> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<blockquote> + +<p>"In a trance I saw a vision; a certain +vessel descend as it had been a great +sheet let down from heaven by four corners. +I considered and saw four-footed +beasts of the earth and beasts and +creeping things and fowls of the air; +and a voice said unto me, Arise, Peter, +slay and eat."</p></blockquote> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">30</span></p> + + + + +<h2 id="IN_AND_BETWEEN_THE_LINES">IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES</h2> + + +<p>The Bible says: Be not among eaters of +flesh.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: It is better to hear the rebuke +of the wise than to hear the hymns of fools.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: If an animal dieth of itself +do not eat it but give it to thy neighbor and let +him eat thereof.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Who knoweth that the +spirit of man goeth upward and the spirit of the +beast goeth downward?</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Your stomachs are an open +sepulchre.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Blessed are the merciful, +for they shall obtain mercy.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Prove all things and hold +fast of that which is good.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Do not be as the hypocrites +are, testifying in public places and yet living +apart from God.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Reason is too high for a +fool.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: He that follows after mercy +findeth life.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: The wise man's eyes are in +his head (he reasons), but the fool's eyes are +neither here nor there, he walketh in darkness.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">31</span></p> + +<p>The Bible says: When a man's ways are in +harmony with higher consciousness he maketh +his enemies be at peace with him.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: The Spirit of God made +Samson a murderer.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: The beasts of the field shall +honor me.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Fool thou art to believe all +that the prophets have said.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: God sent plagues to torment +his people.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Shed not innocent blood.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Praise the Lord every living +creature—the beasts of the field, the birds of +the air and earth, the fish of the waters and +all mankind.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Thy will be done on earth +as it is in Heaven.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Thou art weighed in the +balances and art found wanting.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: There are many false lords +and false gods the people are worshipping.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Come now, let us reason +together.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Faith without works is dead.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: He that killeth an ox is as +if he slew a human.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">32</span></p> + +<p>The Bible says: Beast and man have one +breath; so that man hath no pre-eminence above +the beast; as one dieth so dieth the other.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Thou hast neither part nor +lot in this matter for thy heart is not right in +the sight of God.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Every moving thing that +liveth (grain, fruits, vegetables, nuts, etc.) shall +be food for you, but flesh with the life thereof +which is blood shall ye not eat.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: God blessed every creature.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Behold I have given you +every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face +of the earth and every tree, on the which is +the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall +be for food.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: All that cry Lord, Lord, +are not of God.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: They shall not hurt nor +destroy in all my Holy Mountain.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: I am God, I change not.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Do a little consistent heart +cleaning so that the human mind's eye shall be +spiritual to see and segregate right from wrong.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Christ taught love, leniency, +forgiveness, tenderness and mercy.</p> + +<p>The Bible says: Dead flies cause the apothecary's +ointment to send forth a stinking savour.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">33</span></p> + +<p>Capital punishment or legalized murder is +another miscarriage of consistency; it does not +dovetail into mercy and it does not blend into +the law that God has given man an allotted +time upon the earth. What right have twelve +jurors to virtually cancel the life of a murderer? +Incarcerate the offender under a life sentence +with proper food and training, and ultimately +that murderer's heart and soul might be purer +than Judge, jurors and all connected with the +courts of justice.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>If a criminal under excitement or cool premeditation +takes the life of a human being, the +cool, considerate jurors, responsible for the death +penalty, are just as guilty of murder as the +prisoner.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The butcher is rejected as a juror on a murder +trial on the ground that his business has +hardened his heart, and yet the Judge of the +Superior Court, the sheriff and his deputies and +the eligible jurors all eat of the beef the butcher +slaughters.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Despite the protests that may come to the +surface in reading the inspired, pointed truths, +the fact should be reiterated that Justice, Kindness +and Mercy for every living creature is in +the heart and soul of the true religionist.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">34</span></p> + +<p>The sand-blind carnivorous faith curist +(who reads his Bible through a pair of eye-glasses +not made by God Almighty) tells us of +a divine healing power.</p> + +<p>We hear many testimonies from the lips of +these people praising this wonderful (?) curative +agency, but when sensibly considered we +know the "power" removes only visionary ills.</p> + +<p>Imaginary tumors, etc., hypochondria and +other nervous troubles readily yield to this mythical +physician, but no disease or defect in reality, +can be removed until we remove the physical +cause.</p> + +<p>If we continue living regardless of natural +health laws all the "belief" and all the "faith" +and all the "Blood" cannot offset the inevitable +result of continued disobedience.</p> + +<p>They sometimes speculate as to the stubbornness +and apparent incurability of an ailment and +finally lay the blame to a spiritual insufficiency. +Ridiculous!</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>Mankind is filled with patriotism when a +victorious war is ended, forgetting the awful +gloom pervading some poor mother's home. +The higher self should make us grieve with +those that grieve rather than be exultant at the +loss or downfall of any nation. We should +love all nations and nationalities as we do our +own, and be bound together by inseparable +bonds, realizing that we all must pass to the +final tomb of man on the same level.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">35</span></p> + +<p>A bow of horse hair coming in contact with +the gut strings of a violin produces exquisite +harmony that thrills every fibre of our being +with ecstasy. We can attribute the melody to +the spirit of the deceased animal appealing to +the human heart. Strange that after life has +departed we can charm the muses with tones +produced on a stringed instrument. What human +being has ever bequeathed to the world a +substance to awaken the emotions of our soul +through concord of sweet sounds like unto the +gut of a deceased animal? Evidently there +is more harmony in the entrails of lower creatures +than we find in the entire carcass of religious +civilized carnivorous man.</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<p>The scientist who upholds painful experimental +surgery in the interest of science should +give over his own body for experiment instead +of encouraging the cruelties of vivisection. It +hurts being "cut to pieces," consequently the +heartless scientific fellow, instead of offering his +own body for the dissecting table, tortures a +poor friendless dog or other animal.</p> + +<p>The horrible suffering thousands of helpless +creatures have undergone through the process +of vivisection is heartrending.</p> + +<p>There should be stringent law against such +inhumanity.</p> + +<hr class="chap" /> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">36</span></p> + + + + +<h3 id="A_DEVOUT_ADMONITION">A DEVOUT (?) ADMONITION.</h3> + +<p> +E. E. Kusel,<br /> + Los Angeles, Cal.<br /> +</p> + +<p>Sir: I read your "Humanitarian Philosophy" +booklet and I take it as a mass +of devil talk. It is not in favor of the +Holy Bible and it says it is wrong to +kill animals. This is crossing God's +word. You say it says swine meat is +forbidden. That is the only true statement +in your book but that is the law +for the Jews only. You say it says +thou shalt not kill; of course it does, +and that has references to the human +family only. You say the religious man +that does not shudder at the works of +a butcher is heartless and godless. You +tell a falsehood there. I have been a +believer fifteen years and I know all +animals were made for man.</p> + +<p>I can see the devil has a powerful +influence over you as it had over Voltaire, +Paine, Ingersoll, Edison, Hubbard +and other non-believers. You infidels +preach against God's Bible and +will be burned in the everlasting fires +of hell for it. You will be glad to have +a drop of cold water in your suffering, +but god will not have mercy—it will be +too late then.</p> + +<p>Hell is full of agnostics and infidels +and non-believers burning and suffering +and I warn you to have a care as +to what you say.</p> + +<p>The Catholics and Christian Scientists +are as much of the devil's doings +as you are, so you'll have company if +you do not repent of your infidelity.</p> + +<p>You are adding to God's word and it +is punishable by his wrath (Rev. 22:18.)</p> + +<p>Your book is a lot of lies and infidelity.</p> + +<p class="right"> +N. S. W. <br /> +Birmingham, Ala., Jan. 30, 1911. </p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">37</span></p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<h3 id="A_REPLY">A REPLY.</h3> + + +<p> +Mr. N. S. W.,<br /> + Birmingham, Ala.<br /> +</p> + +<p>My dear sir: In reply to your letter of +Jan. 30th, concerning my "Humanitarian +Philosophy," I wish to candidly tell +you that I am not at all afraid of your +sort of god. The God I worship is not +very likely to materialize in a selfish +fanatical subject, but always comes to +the surface in the heart and soul of honorable, +conscientious thinking men—men +who either profess nothing and +live according to custom or in men who +profess religion and uphold their God +as kind, loving and merciful.</p> + +<p>This latter man is an ethical vegetarian +and will not accept the cruelties +and inconsistencies of the Bible but +says "it is an error in translation."</p> + +<p>As to the lower animals, one preying +upon the other, the conscientious, devout +Bible believer presents the theory +of his own freeing God Almighty from +the sinful responsibility. He divides +Bible truth from Bible error—he accepts +the lofty and beautiful and holds +fast to that which is good.</p> + +<p>If you intend to preach a gospel of +Love you will find it an utter impossibility +to do so if you do not live a Humanitarian +life—a life that forbids the +killing of any thing that suffers pain, +and fear of death as you yourself may +sometimes suffer.</p> + +<p>In conclusion I wish to impress you +with the fact that your letter is sufficient +proof that you read the Bible in a +haphazard style and know not its contents.</p> + +<p>Every assertion, every quotation and +every conclusion in my "Humanitarian +Philosophy," my dear sir, is absolutely +true and justified.</p> + +<p class="right"> +Respectfully, <br /> +E. E. KUSEL. <br /> +</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">38</span></p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<h3 id="FROM_THE_W_A_T_L">FROM THE W. A. T. L.</h3> + + +<p>The tobacco smoking on street cars +has been very much discussed in your +valuable paper recently. Now, I will +suggest that all persons who object to +the poisonous effects of tobacco register +a protest every chance they get and +spend some good money, as I am doing, +to back up their argument against the +most deadly plant used by human beings. +There is no traffic so degrading +in its influence and effect as tobacco. +It goes hand in hand with liquor, and +when we stop the youth of the land +from using the weed, then the saloon +will have no customers.</p> + +<p class="right"> +G. L. R. </p> + +<p>Founder World's Anti-Tobacco League,<br /> +Los Angeles, Cal.</p> + +<p class="center">(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + + +<h3 id="THE_WORST_SIN">THE "WORST" SIN.</h3> + + +<p>The church element construe the +Bible to blend into their own desires +and appetites and then in the name of +their god (little g) they commit every +iniquity under the sun, the most abominable +of which is the eating of "a beef +which has been battered in the head +by the blow of an ax or mutton which +has had its throat cut from ear to ear."</p> + +<p>Get yourself in touch with the Infinite +and you will see that the taking of +animal life for food is a greater sin +than smoking, drinking or satisfying +animal desires. The three last named +are only sinning against the body but +not commendable by any means, while +the first is the horrible sin of taking +life.</p> + +<p>Carnivorous reader (church people +included) think these lines over well +and then move thy tongue seven times +before thou speakest of sin!</p> + +<p class="right"> +E. E. KUSEL. </p> + +<p>Los Angeles, Cal.</p> + +<p class="center">(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">39</span></p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<h3 id="MAN_AND_BEAST">MAN AND BEAST.</h3> + + +<p>What queer and wild notions religious +faddists get into their heads. T. +J. W. wants us to quit killing cattle +and hogs, etc., in fact all kinds of animals +and birds because God has put +them on earth. I would like Mr W. to +tell us what would become of us if we +followed his advice. Why, the animals +would crowd man off the earth in a +short while. The farmer could not +raise any crops. Cattle, deer, hares and +sheep would eat his grain, the coyotes +his chickens and the lions would eat +him.</p> +<p class="right"> +C. V. Pasadena, Cal. </p> +<p class="center"> +(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<hr class="tb" /> + +<h3 id="VEGETARIANS_REPLY">VEGETARIAN'S REPLY.</h3> + + +<p>If you please, Mr. V., I am not a "religious +faddist." I am not religious at +all. I am a firm believer in the Golden +Rule, applying it to man and beast.</p> + +<p>In reply to your query, Mr. V. I will +answer briefly: Self-preservation is the +first law of nature, so protect yourself +against the presumed invasion of tame +and wild beasts, birds, etc., but do not +presume we have the right to take life +of anything which endures pain or runs +away from impending danger unless +occasion calls for it.</p> + +<p>My letter to the Herald, if you please, +was for those who profess to be godly +and "in the kingdom." Religious people +must be strictly humane or they +are minus the God character and their +profession is either a phantom or hypocrisy.</p> + +<p>Of course men like yourself, who are +afraid of being crowded off the earth, +have a special self-given right to raise +and cruelly slaughter any living creature +for eating.</p> + +<p>Meat eating will continue until the +end of the world, no doubt, but the Humanitarian +will not eat it; it will be +devoured by ungodly church people and +outsiders who like the flavor of flesh +food, regardless of the wrong of premeditated +killing.</p> + +<p class="right"> +T. J. W. </p> +<p> +Compton, Cal.</p> +<p class="center"> +(From Los Angeles Herald.)</p> + +<div class="transnote"> +<h3 id="Transcribers_Notes">Transcriber's Notes</h3> + +<p>Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected.</p> + +<p>A Table of Contents has been added.</p> + +<p>The repetition of the headings "QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS" on five and "IN AND BETWEEN THE LINES" +on three consecutive pages has been removed.</p> + +</div> + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Humanitarian Philosophy, 4th Edition, by +Emil Edward Kusel + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK HUMANITARIAN PHILOSOPHY, 4TH *** + +***** This file should be named 48589-h.htm or 48589-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/4/8/5/8/48589/ + +Produced by Bryan Ness, Les Galloway and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This +file was produced from images generously made available +by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at + www.gutenberg.org/license. + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 +North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email +contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the +Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/old/48589-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/48589-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..be1eb22 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/images/cover.jpg diff --git a/old/48589-h/images/decos_p01.jpg b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p01.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3948029 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p01.jpg diff --git a/old/48589-h/images/decos_p02.jpg b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p02.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8b174b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p02.jpg diff --git a/old/48589-h/images/decos_p02inv.jpg b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p02inv.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..ffc70ab --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p02inv.jpg diff --git a/old/48589-h/images/decos_p03.jpg b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p03.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..c8ea8f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p03.jpg diff --git a/old/48589-h/images/decos_p03inv.jpg b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p03inv.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4de1a28 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p03inv.jpg diff --git a/old/48589-h/images/decos_p04.jpg b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p04.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b494c08 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p04.jpg diff --git a/old/48589-h/images/decos_p06.jpg b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p06.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0bd244f --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/images/decos_p06.jpg diff --git a/old/48589-h/images/portrait.jpg b/old/48589-h/images/portrait.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8e8e475 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/48589-h/images/portrait.jpg |
