summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes4
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
-rw-r--r--old/55062-0.txt5825
-rw-r--r--old/55062-0.zipbin112349 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h.zipbin5381315 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/55062-h.htm6166
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/back.jpgbin70443 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/colophon.jpgbin107210 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/cover.jpgbin73526 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/cover_lg.jpgbin150330 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_001_lg.jpgbin153082 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_001_sml.jpgbin74525 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_003_lg.jpgbin150535 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_003_sml.jpgbin76723 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_004_lg.jpgbin148405 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_004_sml.jpgbin72427 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_005_lg.jpgbin152793 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_005_sml.jpgbin73484 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_006_lg.jpgbin151331 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_006_sml.jpgbin73040 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_007_lg.jpgbin151277 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_007_sml.jpgbin74621 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_008_lg.jpgbin150269 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_008_sml.jpgbin74576 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_009_lg.jpgbin150484 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_009_sml.jpgbin75463 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_010_lg.jpgbin148859 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_010_sml.jpgbin68999 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_011_lg.jpgbin150647 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_011_sml.jpgbin73125 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_012_lg.jpgbin150951 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_012_sml.jpgbin73265 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_013_lg.jpgbin152188 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_013_sml.jpgbin71026 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_014_lg.jpgbin152378 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_014_sml.jpgbin72912 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_015_lg.jpgbin150248 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_015_sml.jpgbin74186 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_016_lg.jpgbin152821 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_016_sml.jpgbin72345 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_017_lg.jpgbin153220 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_017_sml.jpgbin76004 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_018_lg.jpgbin149273 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_018_sml.jpgbin70591 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_019_lg.jpgbin153453 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_019_sml.jpgbin76094 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_020_lg.jpgbin151030 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_020_sml.jpgbin75937 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_021_lg.jpgbin153394 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_021_sml.jpgbin74582 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_022_huge.pngbin210442 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_022_lg.pngbin107569 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/55062-h/images/ill_022_sml.pngbin32966 -> 0 bytes
54 files changed, 17 insertions, 11991 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d7b82bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+*.txt text eol=lf
+*.htm text eol=lf
+*.html text eol=lf
+*.md text eol=lf
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c8ad382
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #55062 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/55062)
diff --git a/old/55062-0.txt b/old/55062-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 2062306..0000000
--- a/old/55062-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,5825 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Inns of Court, by Cecil Headlam
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-
-Title: The Inns of Court
-
-Author: Cecil Headlam
-
-Illustrator: Gordon Home
-
-Release Date: July 6, 2017 [EBook #55062]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE INNS OF COURT ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images available at The Internet Archive)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- THE INNS OF COURT
-
- UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME
-
-
- WESTMINSTER ABBEY
-
- PAINTED BY JOHN FULLEYLOVE, R.I. DESCRIBED BY MRS. A. MURRAY SMITH
-
-CONTAINING 21 FULL-PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS IN COLOUR. SQ. DEMY 8VO., CLOTH,
- GILT TOP PRICE =7/6= NET (POST FREE, PRICE 7/11)
-
- “In general appearance, in wealth of illustration, and in
- trustworthy letterpress, it is a charming book.”--_Guardian._
-
-
- THE TOWER OF LONDON
-
- PAINTED BY JOHN FULLEYLOVE, R.I. DESCRIBED BY ARTHUR POYSER
-
-CONTAINING 20 FULL-PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS IN COLOUR. SQ. DEMY 8VO., CLOTH,
- GILT TOP PRICE =7/6= NET (POST FREE, PRICE 7/11)
-
- “Perhaps one of the best books of modern times on the great
- fortification.... The fine paintings by Mr. John Fulleylove give
- added charm to the book.”--_Globe._
-
-
- A. & C. BLACK. SOHO SQUARE. LONDON, W.
-
-
- AGENTS
-
- =AMERICA= THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
- 64 & 66 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK
-
- =AUSTRALASIA= OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
- 205 FLINDERS LANE, MELBOURNE
-
- =CANADA= THE MACMILLAN COMPANY OF CANADA, LTD.
- 27 RICHMOND STREET WEST, TORONTO
-
- =INDIA= MACMILLAN & COMPANY, LTD.
- MACMILLAN BUILDING, BOMBAY
- 309 BOW BAZAAR STREET, CALCUTTA
-
-[Illustration: OLD HALL AND OLD SQUARE FROM THE TOWER OF THE NEW HALL,
-LINCOLN’S INN
-
-On the left is the Old Hall, dating from the reign of Edward VI.
-(_circa_ 1555), and the scene of the Chancery case of Jarndyce _v._
-Jarndyce in ‘Bleak House.’ Beyond the Hall are the red roofs of Old
-Square, and in the distance the domes of the Central Criminal Court and
-St. Paul’s, the latter appearing over a portion of the buildings of the
-Record Office.]
-
-
-
-
- THE INNS
- OF COURT
-
- PAINTED
- BY·GORDON·HOME
- DESCRIBED
- BY·CECIL·HEADLAM
-
- [Illustration: colophon]
-
- LONDON
- ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK
- 1909
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS
-
-
-CHAPTER I
-
- PAGE
-
-ORIGIN OF THE INNS 1
-
-
-CHAPTER II
-
-THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS 27
-
-
-CHAPTER III
-
-THE TEMPLE CHURCH 44
-
-
-CHAPTER IV
-
-THE MIDDLE TEMPLE 54
-
-
-CHAPTER V
-
-THE INNER TEMPLE 86
-
-
-CHAPTER VI
-
-LINCOLN’S INN AND THE DEVIL’S OWN 106
-
-
-CHAPTER VII
-
-GRAY’S INN 135
-
-
-CHAPTER VIII
-
-INNS OF CHANCERY 165
-
-
-CHAPTER IX
-
-THE SERJEANTS AND SERJEANTS’ INNS 186
-
-
-
-
-LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
-
-
- 1. Old Hall and Old Square from the Tower of the New
- Hall, Lincoln’s Inn _Frontispiece_
-
- FACING PAGE
-
- 2. Middle Temple Lane 6
-
- 3. Interior of the Middle Temple Hall 20
-
- 4. Lamb Building from Pump Court, Temple 34
-
- 5. Interior of the Temple Church 46
-
- 6. The East End of the Temple Church and the Master’s House 56
-
- 7. The Middle Temple Gatehouse in Fleet Street 66
-
- 8. Fountain Court and Middle Temple Hall 74
-
- 9. Middle Temple Library 84
-
-10. Hall and Library, Inner Temple 94
-
-11. No. 5, King’s Bench Walk, Inner Temple 102
-
-12. Old Square, Lincoln’s Inn 112
-
-13. The New Gateway and Hall of Lincoln’s Inn 118
-
-14. Stone Buildings, Lincoln’s Inn, from the Gardens 128
-
-15. A Doorway in South Square, Gray’s Inn 144
-
-16. Gray’s Inn Square 154
-
-17. The Gabled Houses outside Staple Inn, Holborn 164
-
-18. Staple Inn Hall and Courtyard 172
-
-19. The Great Hall of the Royal Courts of Justice 176
-
-20. Clifford’s Inn 184
-
-
-_Sketch-plan at end of volume._
-
-
-
-
-THE INNS OF COURT
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER I
-
-ORIGIN OF THE INNS
-
-
-The features of every ancient City are marked with the wrinkles and the
-scars of Time. The narrow lanes, the winding streets, the huddled
-houses, the blind alleys form, as it were, the furrows upon her aged
-countenance. They contribute enormously to the charm and beauty of her
-riper years, for they point to a life rich in experience and varied
-reminiscences. But, like other wrinkles, they have their drawbacks. As
-the bottle-neck of Bond Street, which blocks the traffic half the
-season, is the direct topographical result of the river which once
-flowed thereabouts, so the boundary of the property of the Knights
-Templars, marked by the Inner and Middle Temple Gateways, imposes the
-southern limit of Fleet Street, opposite to Street’s Gothic pile of Law
-Courts and to Chancery Lane. Hence the narrowness of that famous street,
-and the consequent congestion of traffic on the main route to the City.
-Then come the Beauty Doctors, who smooth out the old wrinkles, and
-broaden the ancient, narrow lines, which Time has cut so deeply on the
-face of the Town. The old landmarks are removed, and Wren’s gateways and
-buildings must disappear in order that broad, straight paths be driven
-right to the sanctuary of Business.
-
-And yet the old influences and the effects of historic movements and
-historic events persist, and will persist. It may seem far-fetched to
-say that everyone whose business or pleasure takes him to Fleet Street
-is directly subject to the influence of the Crusades. Yet it is so. But
-for those strange wars of mingled religious enthusiasm and commercial
-aggression, there would have been no Templars, and had there been no
-Templars, the whole nomenclature and topographical arrangement of this
-part of London would have been different; for the Societies of Lawyers,
-who succeeded to their property, succeeded, of course, to the boundaries
-of the messuages, as to the Round Church of the Knights Templars.
-
-Of the Temple, and the Templars, and their successors, we shall deal
-more at length in their proper places. It will be convenient first to
-consider what these Societies of Lawyers were and are, how they arose,
-and why they settled in the particular vicinity wherein they have chosen
-to set their ‘dusty purlieus.’
-
-William the Conqueror had established the Law Courts in his Palace. The
-great officers of State and the Barons were the Judges of this King’s
-Court--_Aula Regis_--which developed into three distinct divisions:
-King’s Bench and Common Pleas, under a Chief Justice, and Exchequer,
-where a Chief Baron presided to try all causes relating to the royal
-revenue. It was the business of a Norman King to ride about the country
-settling the affairs of the realm, which was his estate, and
-administering justice. The great Court of Justice, therefore, naturally
-accompanied the King in all his progresses, and suitors were obliged to
-follow and to find him, travelling for that purpose from all parts of
-the country to London, to Exeter, or to York.
-
-It was a system that was found ‘cumbersome, painful, and chargeable to
-the people,’ as Stow[1] puts it, and one of the provisions of Magna
-Charta accordingly enacted that the Court of Common Pleas should no
-longer follow the King, but be held in some determined place. The place
-determined was Westminster. The Court was held, though not at first, in
-the famous Hall, which William Rufus had erected and Richard II.
-rebuilt.
-
-It was to be expected that the fixing of the Courts would be followed by
-the settlement of ‘Students in the Law and the Ministers of each
-Court,’[2] as Dugdale has it, somewhere near at hand. Advocates had been
-drawn at first from the ranks of the clergy. This was natural enough,
-seeing that they formed the only educated class of the day. _Nullus
-clericus nisi causidicus_, the historian complains. It was equally
-natural that in the course of time objection should be taken to the
-spectacle of the professors of Christianity wrangling at the Bar, and
-monopolizing the power born of legal knowledge. Dugdale notes the first
-instance of an attempt to check their presence in the Courts as
-occurring at the beginning of the reign of Henry III. The clergy were at
-length excluded from practising in the Civil Courts, and a privileged
-class of lay Lawyers came into existence. Edward I. specially appointed
-the Justices of the Court of Common Pleas to ‘ordain from every County
-certain Attorneys and Lawyers of the best and most apt for their
-learning and skill, who might do service to his Court and People, and
-who alone should follow his Court and transact affairs therein.’
-
-And at this date, or shortly after it, we may assume that ‘students in
-the University of the Laws’[3] began to congregate in Hostels, or Inns,
-of Court, in order to study as ‘apprentices’ in the Guild of Law. For,
-as at Oxford or Cambridge, an Inn, or Hostel of residence, was the
-natural necessary requirement of such students when they began to come
-in numbers to sit at the feet of their teachers, the Masters of Law. The
-earliest mention of an Inn for housing apprentices of the Law occurs in
-1344, in a demise from the Lady Clifford of the house near Fleet Street,
-called Clifford’s Inn, to the _apprenticiis de banco_, the lawyers
-belonging to the Court of Common Pleas. And Thavie’s Inn was similarly
-leased from one John Thavie, ‘a worthy citizen and armourer,’ of London,
-who died in 1348. In such hostels, leased to the senior members,
-voluntary associations, or guilds of teachers and learners of law would
-congregate, and gradually evolve their own regulations and customs.
-
-Other references occur to the ‘apprentices in hostels’ during this same
-reign (Edward III.). And from about this date the four Inns of
-Court--Gray’s Inn, Lincoln’s Inn, and the Inner and Middle
-Temple--‘which are almost coincident in antiquity, similar in
-constitution, and identical in purpose,’[4] begin to emerge from the
-mists of the past.
-
-It is noticeable that all the Inns of Court and Chancery cluster about
-the borders of the City Ward called Faringdon Without, and were once
-placed, as old Sir John Fortescue observed, ‘in the suburbs, out of the
-noise and turmoil of the City.’
-
-The Lawyers were thus conveniently placed between the seat of judicature
-at Westminster and the centre of business in the City of London, and
-secured the advantage of ‘ready access to the one and plenty of
-provisions in the other.’ In the wall which bounds the Temple Gardens
-upon the modern Embankment of the Thames is set a stone which marks the
-western boundary of the Liberty of the City and the spot where Queen
-Victoria received the City Sword (1900); the old Bar of the City, which
-took its name from the Temple, and
-
-[Illustration: MIDDLE TEMPLE LANE
-
-THE overhanging buildings just inside Sir Christopher Wren’s Gateway in
-Fleet Street (see p. 67).]
-
-Holborn Bar, marked the limit farther north. It is to be remembered that
-this famous Temple Bar did not mark the boundary of the City proper, but
-only of the later extension known as the Liberty of the City, and the
-Temple buildings within the Bar were yet without the narrower boundary
-of the City.
-
-Temple Bar consisted originally of a post, rails, and chain. Next, a
-house of timber was erected across the street, with a narrow gateway and
-entry on the south side under the house.[5] This was superseded about
-1670 by the stone gate-house, designed by Christopher Wren, which was
-the scene of so many historic pageants when Lord Mayors have received
-their Sovereigns, and presented to them the keys of the City. It was
-here, notably, that the Lord Mayor delivered the City sword to good
-Queen Bess when she rode to St. Paul’s to return thanks for the victory
-over the Spanish Armada. Hereon, as upon London Bridge, the heads of
-famous criminals or rebels were stuck to warn the passers-by; and in the
-pillory here stood Titus Oates and Daniel de Foe--the latter for
-publishing his scandalous and seditious pamphlet, ‘The Shortest Way with
-the Dissenters.’ The citizens, however, pelted De Foe, not with rotten
-eggs, but with flowers. This noble gate-house was removed when the
-Strand was widened and the new Law Courts erected. It was rebuilt at
-Meux Park, Waltham Cross, and its original site is marked by a column
-surmounted by a griffin, representing the City arms (1880).
-
-It would appear that the Lawyers in choosing sites just outside the City
-boundaries for the Inns of their University were further influenced by
-the ordinance of Henry III. (1234), which enjoined the Mayor and
-Sheriffs to see to it that ‘no man should set up Schools of Law within
-the City.’ The object of this prohibition is a matter of dispute;
-Stubbs, for instance, maintaining that it applied to Canon Law, and
-others[6] that only Civil Law was intended, the object being to confine
-the clergy to the Theology and Canon Law, which seemed more properly
-their province.
-
-By the middle of the fourteenth century, then, we find the students of
-what we may call a London University of National Law established in
-their Inns or Hostels, which clustered about the boundaries of the City,
-from Holborn to Chancery Lane, from Fleet Street to the River. The
-Schools of Law, of which this University was composed, were
-distinctively English, and the University itself developed upon the
-peculiarly English lines of a College system, closely similar to that of
-Oxford and Cambridge. The Inns of Court and Chancery were the Colleges
-of Lawyers in the London University of Jurisprudence.
-
-Here dwelt, and here were trained for the Courts those guilds or
-fraternities of Lawyers, according to a scheme of oral and practical
-education which they gradually evolved. Trade Guilds were the basis of
-medieval social life, and medieval Universities were, in fact, nothing
-more nor less than Guilds of Study.[7] The four Inns of Court survive
-to-day as instances of the old Guilds of Law in London, and the lawyers,
-in their relations with the Courts, the public and solicitors, seem to
-represent still a highly organized Trade Union.
-
-The Inns of Court, then, have always exhibited, and still retain, the
-salient features of a University based upon the procedure of the
-medieval Guild. Just as, in other Universities, no one was allowed to
-teach until he had served an apprenticeship of terms, and, having been
-duly approved by the Masters of their Art, had received his degree or
-diploma of teaching; just as no butcher or tailor was allowed to ply his
-trade until he had qualified himself and had been duly approved by the
-Masters of his Guild, so in the Masters of these Guilds of Law was
-vested the monopoly of granting the legal degree, or call to practise at
-the Bar, to apprentices who had served a stipulated term of study and
-passed the ordeal of certain oral and practical preparation. And as
-though to emphasize beyond dispute the Collegiate nature of these
-Societies, we find that each one of them made haste to provide itself
-with buildings and surroundings, which still present to us, in the midst
-of the dirt and turmoil of busy London, something of the charm and
-seclusion and self-sufficiency of an Oxford College, with its Hall and
-Chapel, its residential buildings, its Library, and grassy quadrangles,
-and its Gateway to insure its privacy.
-
-The same system of discipline, of celibate life, of a common Hall, of
-residence in community, and of compulsory attendance at the services of
-the Church, which marked the ordinary life of a medieval University, was
-repeated at the Inns of Court.
-
-And the kind of Collegiate Order into which they shaped themselves was
-also shown by the several grades existing within the Societies
-themselves. The word ‘barrister’ itself perpetuates the ancient
-discipline of the Inns, where the dais of the governing body, or
-Benchers, corresponding to the High Table of an Oxford College, was
-separated by a bar from the profane crowd of the Hall. The Halls of the
-Inns were not only the scenes of that business of eating and drinking,
-the ‘dinners’ to which so much attention was devoted, and by which the
-students ‘eat their way to the Bench,’ but also the centres of the
-social life and educational system of these Guilds.
-
-Dugdale gives at length the degrees of Tables in the Halls of the
-Inns--the Benchers’ Tables, the tables of the Utter Barristers, the
-tables of the Inner-Bar, and the Clerks’ Commons, and, without the
-screen, the Yeoman’s Table for Benchers’ Clerks.
-
-The _Utter-_ or _Outer Barristers_ ranked next to the Benchers. They
-were the advanced students who, after they had attained a certain
-standing, were called from the body of the Hall to the first place
-outside the bar for the purpose of taking part in the _moots_ or public
-debates on points of law. The _Inner Barristers_ assembled near the
-centre of the Hall.
-
-‘For the space of seven years or thereabouts,’ says Stow, ‘they frequent
-readings, meetings, boltinges, and other learned exercises, whereby
-growing ripe in the knowledge of the lawes, and approved withal to be of
-honest conversation, they are either by the general consent of the
-Benchers or Readers, being of the most auncient, grave and iudiciall men
-of everie Inn of the Court, or by the special priviledge of the present
-Reader there, selected and called to the degree of Utter Barristers, and
-so enabled to be Common Counsellors, and to practise the law, both in
-their Chambers, and at the Barres.’
-
-Readers, to help the younger students, were chosen from the Utter
-Barristers. From the Utter Barristers, too, were chosen by the Benchers
-‘the chiefest and best learned’ to increase the number of the Bench and
-to be Readers there also. After this ‘second reading’ the young
-Barrister was named an Apprentice at the Law, and might be advanced at
-the pleasure of the Prince, as Stow says, to the place of Serjeant, ‘and
-from the number of Serjeants also the void places of Judges are likewise
-ordinarily filled.’ ‘From thenceforth they hold not any roome in those
-Innes of Court, being translated to the Serjeants’ Innes, where none
-but the Serjeants and Judges do converse’ (Stow, i., pp. 78, 79).
-
-Upon the Benchers, or Ancients, devolved the government of the Inn, and
-from their number a treasurer was chosen annually.
-
-_Readings_ and _Mootings_ would seem to have been the chief forms of
-legal training provided by the Societies, and they may be said roughly
-to represent the theoretical and practical side of their system of
-education. As to Readings, the procedure in general was as follows:
-Every year the Benchers chose two Readers, who entered upon their duties
-to the accompaniment of the most elaborate ceremonial and feasting. Then
-upon certain solemn occasions it was the duty of one of them to deliver
-a lecture upon some statute rich in nice points of law. The Reader would
-first explain the whole matter at large, and after summing up the
-various arguments bearing on the case, would deliver his opinion. The
-Utter Barristers then discussed with him the points that had been
-raised, after which some of the Judges and Serjeants present gave their
-opinions in turn.[8]
-
-I have referred to the _feasting_ that attended the appointment of the
-Readers. We have seen that medieval Universities were Guilds of
-Learning, scholastic fraternities of masters or students, who framed
-rules and exacted compliance with certain tests of skill, precisely in
-the same way as did the masters and apprentices of ordinary manual
-trades. It was a universal feature of the Guilds, whether of manual
-crafts or of Learning, that the newly-elected Master was expected to
-entertain the Fraternity to which he had been admitted, or in which he
-had just been raised to the full honours of Mastership. And just as at
-Oxford, Cambridge, or Paris, a Master was obliged to give a feast, or
-even some more sumptuous form of hospitality, such as a tilt or tourney,
-upon the attainment of his degree, so at the Inns of Court the
-newly-appointed Reader was obliged by custom to entertain the Benchers
-and Barristers in Hall. It was the general experience everywhere that
-such entertainments tended to increase in splendour and costliness, and
-to be a severe tax upon the resources of the new Masters, and a check,
-consequently, upon the number of aspirants. So here the excessive
-charges attending Readers’ feasts led to a decrease in the Readers,
-which was regarded as tending to ‘an utter overthrow to the learning and
-study of the Law,’ and the Justices of both Benches accordingly issued
-an order insisting upon their observance, and at the same time
-regulating the amount that a Reader might expend upon ‘diet in the
-Hall.’
-
-_Moots_ were a kind of rehearsal of real trials at the Bar. They were
-cases argued in Hall by the Utter and Inner Barristers before the
-Benchers.
-
-When the horn had blown to dinner, says Dugdale, a paper containing
-notice of the Case which was to be argued after dinner was laid upon the
-salt. Then, after dinner, in open Hall, the mock-trial began. An Inner
-Barrister advanced to the table, and there propounded in Law-French--an
-exceedingly hybrid lingo--some kind of action on behalf of an imaginary
-client. Another Inner Barrister replied in defence of the fictitious
-defendant, and the Reader and Benchers gave their opinions in turn.
-
-As in other Universities, other subjects besides Law were included in
-the educational curriculum.
-
-‘Upon festival days,’ says Fortescue, who wrote in the seventeenth
-century, ‘after the offices of the Church are over, they employ
-themselves in the study of sacred and profane history; here everything
-which is good and virtuous is to be learned, all vice is discouraged and
-banished. So that knights, barons, and the greatest nobility of the
-kingdom often place their children in those Inns of Court, to form their
-manners, and to preserve them from the contagion of vice.’
-
-As time went on, in fact, the Inns of Court gradually changed their
-character, and became a kind of aristocratic University, where many of
-the leading men in politics and literature received a general training
-and education.
-
-And whilst Oxford and Cambridge, essentially more democratic, drew their
-students chiefly from the yeoman and artisan class, the Inns of Court
-became the fashionable colleges for young noblemen and gentlemen.
-
-Throughout the Renaissance, indeed, the Inns of Court men were the
-leaders of Society, and the Gentlemen of the Long Robe laid down the
-law, not only upon questions of politics, but upon points of taste, of
-dress, and of art.
-
-In the reign of Henry VI. the four Inns of Court contained each 200
-persons, and the ten Inns of Chancery 100 each. The expense of
-maintaining the students there was so great that ‘the sons of gentlemen
-do only study the Law in these hostels.’
-
-‘There is scarce an eminent lawyer who is not a gentleman by birth and
-fortune,’ says Fortescue; ‘consequently they have a greater regard for
-their character and honour.’
-
-And John Ferne, a student of the Inner Temple, wrote,[9] in 1586,
-especially commending the wisdom of the regulation that none should be
-admitted to the Houses of Court except he were a gentleman of blood,
-since ‘nobleness of blood, joyned with virtue, compteth the person as
-most meet to the enterprizing of any publick service.’
-
-Shortly after the accession of James I., a royal mandate denied
-admission to a House of Court to anyone that was ‘not a gentleman by
-descent.’
-
-‘The younger sort,’ says Stow (1603), ‘are either gentlemen, or the sons
-of gentlemen, or of other most welthie persons.’
-
-It is one of the almost unvarying features of a Guild that a fixed
-period of apprenticeship must be served before admission to be a Master.
-The term of apprenticeship in the Inns of Court has varied with each
-Society, and in different epochs.
-
-In June, 1596, the period of probation which must be spent by a student
-in attending preliminary exercises in the Inns, before graduating in
-Law, was limited by an ordinance of the Judges and Benchers to seven
-years. Before that date the ‘exercises’ necessary for ‘a call to the
-Bar’ occupied eight years, during which twelve grand moots must be
-attended in one of the Inns of Chancery, and twenty petty moots in term
-time before the Readers of one of the greater Societies.
-
-But in 1617, in a ‘Parliament’ of the Benchers of the Inner Temple, it
-was ordained that ‘no man shall be called to the Bar before he has been
-full eight years of the House.’ Nor was lapse of time to be considered
-sufficient without proportionate acquisition of learning. Only ‘painful
-and sufficient students’ were to be called, who had ‘frequented and
-argued grand and petty moots in the Inns of Chancery, and brought in
-moots and argued clerks’ common cases within this House.’ A proviso
-against outside influence was added by the injunction that ‘anyone who
-procured letters from any great person to the Treasurer or Benchers in
-order to be called to the Bar, should forever be disqualified from
-receiving that degree within that House.’
-
-In the seventeenth century, however, ‘readings’ and ‘mootings’ alike
-fell into desuetude, and official instruction practically disappeared.
-The Inns became merely formal institutions, residence within the walls
-of which, indicated by the eating of dinners, was alone necessary for
-admittance to the Bar. The loss of the Law was the gain of Letters. A
-new class of students, educated in literature and politics, and highly
-born, were bred up to take their place in the direction of affairs and
-the criticism of writers.
-
-‘When the “readings” with their odds and ends of law-French and Latin
-went out into the darkness of oblivion, polite literature stepped into
-their place. “Wood’s Institutes” and “Finch’s Law” shared a divided
-reign with Beaumont and Fletcher, Butler and Dryden, Congreve and Aphra
-Behn. The “pert Templar” became a critic of _belles lettres_, and
-foremost among the wits, whereas his predecessors had been simply
-regarded by the outer world as a race that knew or cared for little else
-save black-letter tomes and musty precedents. Polite literature
-ultimately came to clothe the very forms of law with an elegance of
-diction not dreamed of in the philosophy of the older jurists, and thus
-deprived an arduous study of one of its most repellent features.’[10]
-
-Another cause which greatly contributed to the brilliant record of the
-Inns as homes of Literature and the Drama, as well as of the Law, was
-the rule which, up till quite a few years ago, compelled Irish
-Law-students to keep a certain number of terms in London prior to ‘call’
-at the King’s Inn, Dublin. Daniel O’Connell, at Lincoln’s Inn, Curran,
-Flood, Grattan, the orators; Tom Moore, the poet, and Richard Brinsley
-Sheridan, the dramatist, at the Temple, are among the later ‘Wild
-Irishmen’ who owed something to the London Inns in accordance with this
-rule, and rewarded the Metropolis with their eloquence and wit.
-
-In modern times the need of general regulations as to qualification by
-the keeping of terms and of examinations as a guarantee of competency
-has been recognized.
-
-After over 200 years of survival as an obsolete office, Readerships have
-been revived again to perform their proper functions. ‘A council of
-eight Benchers, representing all the Inns of Court, was appointed to
-frame lectures “open to the members of each society,” and five
-Readerships were established in several branches of legal science
-(1852). Attendance at these lectures was made compulsory, unless the
-candidate preferred submitting to an examination in Roman and English
-Law and Constitutional History. Three years
-
-[Illustration: INTERIOR OF THE MIDDLE TEMPLE HALL
-
-THE date of its erection (1570) is in the stained-glass window on the
-right. In this Hall Queen Elizabeth may have danced with Sir Christopher
-Hatton, and here Shakespeare’s ‘Twelfth Night’ was first performed (see
-pp. 75-78).]
-
-later, a Royal Commission advised the establishment of a preliminary and
-final examination for all Bar students, together with the formation of a
-Law University with power to confer degrees in Law. The suggestions of
-the Commission were only partially acted upon, and then not till 1870,
-when Lord Chancellor Westbury succeeded in getting a preliminary
-examination in Latin and English subjects adopted and the final
-examination made obligatory.’[11]
-
-And it is pleasant to note, too, that about the same time (1875) the
-custom of the ancient mootings, so useful for promoting ready address
-and sound knowledge of the Law among the aspirants to the Bar, was
-revived at Gray’s Inn.
-
-The discipline which the Inns of Court enforced upon their students
-corresponded in general to that exercised by an Oxford or Cambridge
-College.
-
-Fines and ‘putting out of Commons’ were the usual forms of punishment,
-though the power of imprisoning ‘gentlemen of the House’ for wilful
-misdemeanour and disobedience ‘was sometimes exercised by the Masters of
-the Bench.’[12]
-
-Attendance at Divine Service was insisted upon, and the wearing of long
-beards forbidden. A beard of over three weeks’ growth was subject to a
-fine of 20s. A student’s gown and a round cap must be worn in Hall and
-in Church, and gentlemen of these Societies were forbidden to go into
-the City in boots and spurs, or into Hall with any weapon except
-daggers. They were forbidden to keep Hawkes, or to ill-treat the
-Butlers. They were not allowed to play shove-groat. In the reign of
-Elizabeth, by an order of the Judges for all the Inns of Court, the
-wearing of a sword or buckler, of a beard above a fortnight’s growth, or
-of great hose, great ruffs, any silk or fur, was equally forbidden, and
-no Fellow of these Societies was allowed to go into the City or suburbs
-‘otherwise than in his gown according to the ancient usage of the
-gentlemen of the Inns of Court,’ upon penalty of expulsion for the third
-transgression. The wearing of gowns of a sad colour was enjoined by
-Philip and Mary, and long hair, or curled, was forbidden as surely as
-white doublets and velvet. These are echoes of the ordinary sumptuary
-laws of the period.
-
-‘There is both in the Inns of Court and the Inns of Chancery,’ says
-Fortescue, ‘a sort of an Academy or Gymnasium fit for persons of their
-station, where they learn singing and all kinds of music, dancing and
-Revels.’ These forms of recreation constituted, indeed, the lighter side
-of the educational and social life of the Inns.
-
-All-Hallowe’en, Candlemas, and Ascension Day, were the grand days for
-‘dancing, revelling, and musick,’ when, before the Judges and Benchers
-seated at the upper end of the Hall, the Utter Barristers and Inner
-Barristers performed ‘a solemn revel,’ which was followed by a
-post-revel, when ‘some of the Gentlemen of the Inner-Barr do present the
-House with dancing.’[13] On occasions of more particular festivity, even
-so great dignitaries as the Lord-Chancellor, the Justices, Serjeants,
-and Benchers, would dance round the coal fire which blazed beneath the
-louvre in the centre of the Hall, whilst the verses of the Song of the
-House rang out in rousing chorus, like the song of the Mallard of All
-Souls, at Oxford.
-
-Dugdale gives the order of the Christmas ceremonies in delightful
-detail: ‘At night, before supper, are revels and dancing, and so also
-after supper, during the twelve daies of Christmas. The antientest
-Master of the Revels is after dinner and supper to sing a carol or song,
-and command other gentlemen then there present to sing with him and the
-company.’ On Christmas Day ‘Service in the Church ended, the gentlemen
-presently repair into the Hall, to breakfast with Brawn, Mustard and
-Malmsey,’ and so forth. The good-fellowship and the long evenings of
-Christmastide had natural issue in the production of plays and masques
-in these Halls, by students who have always been in close touch with the
-drama. It is not surprising, therefore, that one of Shakespeare’s plays
-was written for Twelfth Night, and first produced by the students of
-Law, at the Temple, for this merry and convivial season (see Chapter
-IV.).
-
-On St. Stephen’s Day the Lord of Misrule was abroad, and at dinner and
-afterwards games and pageants were performed about the fire that burned
-in the centre of the Hall, and whence the smoke escaped through the open
-chimney in the roof. For instance: ‘Then cometh in the Master of the
-Game apparelled in green velvet, and the Ranger of the Forest also, in a
-green suit of satten, bearing in his hand a green bow and divers arrows,
-with either of them a hunting horn about their necks; blowing together
-three blasts of Venery, they pace round about the fire three times.’
-They make obeisance to the Lord Chancellor, and then ‘a Huntsman cometh
-into the Hall, with a Fox and a Purse-net, with a Cat, both bound at the
-end of a staff, and with them nine or ten couple of Hounds. And the Fox
-and Cat are by the Hounds set upon, and killed beneath the fire’
-(Dugdale).
-
-The Post Revels, we are told, were ‘performed by the better sort of the
-young gentlemen of the Societies, with Galliards, Corrantoes, or else
-with Stage-plays.’ Masques were frequently performed by the members of
-the Inns, and Sir Christopher Hatton first obtained Queen Elizabeth’s
-favour by his appearance in a masque prepared by the lawyers.
-
-Besides the solemnities of Christmas and Readers’ Feasts, the _Antique
-Masques and Revelries_, as Wynne in his ‘Eunomus’ observes (ii., p.
-253), ‘introduced upon extraordinary occasions, as to the grandeur of
-the preparations, the dignity of the performers and of the spectators,
-at which our Kings and Queens have condescended to be so often present,
-seem to have exceeded every public exhibition of the kind.’
-
-One famous masque was presented by the four Inns of Court to Charles I.
-and Henrietta (1633), which cost some £24,000. So pleased were the King
-and Queen with ‘the noble bravery of it,’ and the answer implied in it
-to Prynne’s ‘Histrio Mastix,’ that they returned the compliment by
-inviting 120 gentlemen of the Inns of Court to the masque at Whitehall
-on Shrove Tuesday.
-
-If these and other old customs have fallen into abeyance, the
-traditional spirit of sociability is far from being dead, and on ‘Grand
-Nights’ their old habit of hospitality is gratefully revived by the Inns
-of Court in favour of famous men, who are honoured as their guests.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER II
-
-THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS
-
-
-About the year 1118 certain noblemen, horsemen, religiously bent, bound
-themselves by vow in the hands of the Patriarch of Jerusalem, ‘to serve
-Christ after the manner of Regular Canons in chastity and obedience, and
-to renounce their owne proper willes for ever.’
-
-The Order was founded by a Burgundian Knight who had mightily
-distinguished himself at the capture of Jerusalem. Hugh de Paganis was
-his name. Only seven of his comrades joined the Brotherhood at first.
-
-Their first profession was to safeguard pilgrims on their way to visit
-the Holy Sepulchre, and to keep the highways safe from thieves. A rule
-and a white habit were granted to this pilgrims’ police by Pope Honorius
-II. Crosses of red cloth were afterwards added to their white upper
-garments, and earned them the familiar title of the Red-Cross Knights.
-And for their first banner they adopted the Beaucéant, the upper part of
-which was black, signifying, it is said, death to their enemies; the
-lower part white, symbolizing love for their friends.
-
-Their services were rewarded and their efforts encouraged by Baldwin,
-King of Jerusalem, who granted them quarters in his palace, within the
-sacred enclosure of the Temple on Mount Moriah.
-
-Hence they came to be known as the Knights of the Temple, or Knights
-Templars. For Baldwin’s Palace was formed partly of a building erected
-by the Emperor Justinian, partly of a mosque built by the Caliph Omar,
-upon the site of Solomon’s Temple.
-
-The Order increased rapidly in popularity. It spread over Europe and the
-East, accumulating property and privileges. It was most highly
-organized, and at its head was a Grand Master, who resided at first in
-Jerusalem. A visit paid by the Founder, Paganis, to Henry I. in Normandy
-led to the establishment of settlements in England. Cambridge,
-Canterbury, Warwick, and Dover are mentioned amongst others by Stow.
-Temples, ‘built after the form of the Temple near to the Sepulchre at
-Jerusalem,’ were erected in many of the chief towns in England. And
-this circular shape of church, modelled upon the Holy Sepulchre in
-accordance with a prevailing love of imitating the holy places at
-Jerusalem, as, for instance, the Stations of the Cross, was the design
-adopted for the Templars’ London Churches. The date of their first
-settlement in London is not certain, but about the middle of the twelfth
-century they are said to have established themselves in Chancery Lane,
-between Southampton Buildings and Holborn Bars. Their property, which
-was afterwards to be known as the Old Temple, embraced part of the site
-of what is now Lincoln’s Inn. The foundations of a round church were
-discovered in 1595 near the site of the present Southampton Buildings.
-
-But it was not long before they moved to a pleasanter site, to the ‘most
-elegant spot in the Metropolis,’ as Charles Lamb declared. For, about
-the year 1180, the Templars acquired a large meadow sloping down to the
-broad River Thames, on the south side of Fleet Street, and stretching
-from Whitefriars on the east to Essex Street on the west. Here they
-built themselves a lordly dwelling-place and a splendid Church, again a
-round Church upon the same sacred model, part of which still stands.
-Across the way lay their recreation ground. For the site of the modern
-Law Courts--that Gothic pile which we can never wholly see, and in which
-Street just failed to design a truly complete, effective, and absolute
-building, and failed entirely to produce a building practically suited
-for its purpose--was known then as Fitchett’s Field. The scene of the
-labours of the Lawyers, who have succeeded to their inheritance, was
-once the tilting-ground of the Knights Templars.
-
-Five years later, in 1185, in the presence of Henry II. and all his
-Court, the dedication of the Round Church of the ‘New Temple’ took
-place. The ceremony was performed by Heraclius, Patriarch of Jerusalem.
-
-The surroundings of the ‘New Temple,’ when Henry graced it upon this
-occasion with his royal presence, were extraordinarily different even
-from the aspect they wore a century later.
-
-Fleet Street itself was not yet in existence. Its neighbourhood was a
-mere marsh, and Fleet Ditch, at the bottom of Ludgate Hill, was spanned
-by no bridge. The two highways to the City, when the Templars first
-settled at this spot, were first and foremost the River, and, secondly,
-by land, the old Roman Way through Newgate, up Holborn Hill to Holborn
-Bars, striking southwards from St. Mary-le-Strand, past the Roman Bath,
-to the River. But seventy years later a new main route to the City was
-constructed, which passed by the boundary of the Templars’ plot. For the
-marshes were drained, a bridge was thrown across the Fleet, and the
-‘Street of Fleetbrigge’ came into existence.
-
-The grandeur of the ceremony of dedication and the splendour of the
-Templars’ Church itself indicate clearly enough the importance of the
-‘New Temple’ as the headquarters of the Order in England, and also the
-waxing wealth and power of the Order itself.
-
-For these ‘fellow-soldiers of Christ,’ as they termed themselves, ‘poor
-and of the Temple of Solomon,’ had bound themselves to a vow of poverty,
-but they soon changed their allegiance to Mammon. The heraldic sign of
-the Winged Horse, which is now the well-known badge of the Inner Temple,
-and meets the eye at every turn as we pass through the narrow lanes and
-devious courts of which their property is composed, recalls and typifies
-the changing purposes of the ancient Templars and their successors. For
-the old crest of the Templars was a horse carrying two men, which
-probably was intended to suggest their profession of helping Christian
-pilgrims upon their road, but in which some saw an emblem of humiliation
-and of a vow to poverty so strict that they could afford but one horse
-for two knights. Whatever its significance, the badge was changed with
-changing circumstances. The two riders were converted into two wings,
-and the horse transformed into a Pegasus--Pegasus argent on a field
-azure--upon the occasion of some Christmas Revels and pageantry held at
-the Inner Temple in honour of Lord Robert Dudley, 1563, when it appears
-that this emblem, typical of the soaring ambitions of the new Society,
-was adopted by that Inn. The Middle Temple appropriated another badge,
-which the Templars had assumed in the thirteenth century. This was the
-sign of the _Agnus Dei_, the Holy Lamb, with the banner and nimbus,
-which figures so prominently upon the buildings of this Inn. These
-heraldic signs of Winged Horse and Holy Lamb should be encouraging to
-the young litigant, who, in his first experience of the Law, may be led
-to expect ‘justice without guile and law without delay’ from these legal
-fraternities, supposing that, in the words of the witty skit,
-
- ‘The Lamb sets forth their innocence,
- The Horse their expedition.’
-
-The Order of Templars followed the almost invariable practice of such
-Institutions in accumulating treasure at the expense of the devout, and
-they succeeded more strikingly than most. By the beginning of the
-fourteenth century they had long abandoned all pretence to the
-performance of their original duties, but had at least earned the
-reputation of being exceedingly wealthy. The Treasury, indeed, of these
-devotees of Poverty was a prominent feature of their House, and they
-seem to have acted as Bankers, to whom the charge of money and jewels
-was entrusted in those troublous times.
-
-Here King John stored his Royal Treasury; here he often lodged, seeking
-refuge from his Barons; and here he passed the night before he signed
-the Great Charter at Runnymede. Henry III. followed his example in
-endowing the Temple with manors and privileges, whilst from his
-guardian, Hubert de Burgh, Earl of Kent, whom he had imprisoned in the
-Tower, he extracted all the Treasure that careful nobleman had committed
-to the custody of the Master of the Temple.
-
-Hither came King Edward I., and under pretence of seeing his mother’s
-jewels there laid up, this royal burglar broke open the coffers of
-certain persons who had likewise lodged their money here, and took away
-to the value of a thousand pounds.
-
-Of the Templars’ Treasure House nothing now remains, but the Treasurer
-survives, one of the chief officials of the Inn, whose duties correspond
-roughly to those of a Bursar of an Oxford College.
-
-The laying up of treasure upon earth is always apt to provoke the
-predatory instinct, even in the breast of a Chancellor of the Exchequer,
-and to the motive of greed was added, in the case of the Templars, the
-unanswerable charge that they had done nothing for many years to redeem
-their vows to succour Jerusalem or protect pilgrims. They were also
-accused, not without reason, of indulging in odious vices, and of being
-a masonic society devoted to the propagation of some heresy. The rival
-fraternity of military Knights, the Order of St. John, who had settled
-themselves in the rural seclusion of Clerkenwell, envied them. The Pope
-himself turned against them. Philip le Bel, who seems to have been the
-leading spirit in a general attack, dealt cruelly with the Order in
-France, causing the chief Members of it to be put to death. In England
-Edward II. contented himself with confiscating their possessions. The
-Order was abolished (1312), and, by decree of the Pope,
-
-[Illustration: LAMB BUILDING FROM PUMP COURT, TEMPLE
-
-A GLIMPSE of the Temple Church appears on the left.]
-
-confirmed by the Council of Vienne, all their property was granted to
-the Knights Hospitallers, the rival Order of St. John of Jerusalem.
-Edward, however, at first ignored their claims. He granted that part of
-the Templars’ domain which was not within the City boundaries, and which
-is now represented by the Outer Temple, to Walter de Stapleton, Bishop
-of Exeter. It was thenceforth known indifferently as Stapleton Inn,
-Exeter Inn, or the Outer Temple. It passed by purchase to Robert
-Devereux, Earl of Essex. Essex House was then erected, which, with its
-gardens, covered the site now occupied by Essex Court, Devereux Court,
-and Essex Street, and the buildings that abut upon the Strand.
-
-The Gate at the end of Essex Street, with the staircase to the water, is
-the only portion of the old building that survives. The Outer Temple was
-never occupied by any College or Society of Lawyers. But the history of
-the portion of the Templars’ property which lay within the liberties of
-the City, indicated by Temple Bar, was destined to be very different.
-This property was granted by Edward II. to Thomas, Earl of Lancaster. On
-his rebellion the estate reverted to the Crown, and was granted, in
-1322, to Aymer de Valence, Earl of Pembroke. He died without issue, and
-Edward bestowed the property upon his new favourite, Hugh le Despencer,
-upon whose attainder it passed again to the Crown. At length the claim
-of the Knights Hospitallers was admitted. For in 1324 Edward II.
-assigned to them ‘all the lands of the Templars,’ except, of course,
-some nineteen-twentieths which King and Pope ‘touched’ in transference.
-The King finally made to them an absolute grant of the whole Temple,
-apart from the Outer Temple, in consideration of £100 contributed for
-the wars.
-
-What happened next it is impossible, owing to lack of documentary
-evidence, with certainty to say. This absence of evidence is partly due,
-no doubt, to the behaviour of Wat Tyler’s men in 1381, as quoted by
-Stow. For they not only sacked and burned John of Gaunt’s noble palace,
-the neighbouring Savoy, but also ‘destroyed and plucked down the houses
-and lodgings of the Temple, and took out of the Church the books and
-records that were in Hutches of the apprentices of the law, carried them
-into the streets and burnt them.’ And later records must have
-disappeared in other ways, notably in the fire of 1678. Be that as it
-may, the fact with which everybody is familiar is that the Temple
-property passed into the occupancy, and finally into the possession, of
-two Societies of Lawyers, who existed, and still exist, on terms of
-absolute equality, neither taking precedence of the other, and both
-sharing equally the Round Church of the Knights Templars. These two
-Societies or Inns are called after the property of the Knights within
-the boundaries of the City, which they divided between them--the Inner
-and the Middle Temple.
-
-Now, the first discoverable mention of the Temple as an abode of lawyers
-occurs in Chaucer’s ‘Prologue to the Canterbury Tales’ (_c._ 1387).
-Geoffrey Chaucer himself, a fond tradition would have us believe, dwelt
-for a while in these Courts, and was a student of the Inner Temple. Be
-that as it may, he tells us
-
- ‘A manciple there was of a Temple ...
- Of Masters had he mo than thrice ten,
- That were of Law expert and curious;
- Of which there was a dozen in that house
- Worthy to been Stewards of rent and land
- Of any Lord that is in England,’ etc.
-
-Here, then, we have a clear indication of a Society of Masters dwelling
-in the Temple, whilst Walsingham’s account of Wat Tyler’s rebellion
-refers to apprentices of the Law there. But there is nothing to indicate
-the existence of the two Inns till about the middle of the fifteenth
-century, when we find references to them in the Paston Letters (1440
-_ff._), and in the Black Book of Lincoln’s Inn (1466 _ff._). This does
-not, of course, prove that there was only one Inn before. Such, however,
-is the traditional account. ‘In spite of the damage done by the rebels
-under Wat Tyler,’ says Dugdale, ‘the number of students so increased
-that at length they divided themselves in two bodies--the Society of the
-Inner and the Society of the Middle Temple.’ Those who believe this
-maintain that when, in course of natural development--rapid expansion
-apparently following the rebels’ onslaught--the original Society had
-attained an unwieldy bulk and outgrown the capacity of the Old Hall, a
-split was made. Two distinct and divided Societies, upon a footing of
-absolute equality, took the place of the parent body. A new Hall was
-built, but equal rights in the Old Church and the contiguous property
-were maintained.
-
-This form of propagation by subdivision is common enough, of course, in
-the vegetable and insect world, but it seems highly improbable in the
-case of a learned body. It is to me an incredible dichotomy. And it is
-not necessary to stretch one’s credulity so far. There are
-indications--faint, it is true, but still indications--of the existence
-of two Societies of Lawyers settled here on two parcels of land that
-once belonged to the Knights Templars, and dating from almost the
-earliest days after Edward’s confiscation.
-
-For, according to Dugdale, who repeats a tradition which is probably
-correct, the Knights Hospitallers leased the property soon after they
-had acquired it to ‘divers apprentices of the Law that came from
-Thavie’s Inn in Holborn’ at an annual rental of £10. This must have been
-before 1348. For in that year died John Thavye, who bequeathed this Inn
-to his wife, and described it in his will as one ‘in which certain
-apprentices of the Law _used_ to reside’ (_solebant_). But there is also
-evidence of another and earlier settlement of lawyers on this property.
-Some lawyers, it is recorded, ‘made a composition with the Earl of
-Lancaster for a lodging in the Temple, and so came thither and have
-continued ever since.’[14] The Earl of Lancaster, as we have seen above,
-held the Temple _c._ 1315-1322.
-
-Here, then, we have indications of two Societies of Lawyers settling in
-the Temple. The first body, holding from the Earl of Lancaster, may
-reasonably be supposed to have had their grant confirmed by the owners
-who succeeded him. The Society of the Middle Temple must be considered
-the successors of those tenants. And this Society Mr. Pitt Lewis,
-K.C.,[15] has traced to a former home in St. George’s Inn, a students’
-hostel mentioned by Stow.
-
-The second body, migrating from Thavye’s Inn, obtained a lease of the
-part not occupied by the former, at an annual rental of £10, as Dugdale
-states. And from them are descended the Inner Templars of to-day.
-
-From the time when the Order of the Knights Hospitallers was dissolved,
-till 1608, these two Societies held these two separate parcels of land
-direct of the Crown by lease, paying two separate rents. Then they
-discovered that James I. was beginning to negotiate a sale of the
-freehold.
-
-The present of a ‘stately cup of pure gold, filled with gold pieces,’
-presented by the two Societies, converted the Scholar-Monarch. On August
-13, 1608, he granted a Charter to the Treasurers and Benchers of the
-Inner and Middle Temple, conferring upon them the freehold of the
-Temple, together with the Church, ‘for the hospitation and education of
-the Professors and Students of the Laws of this Realm,’ subject to a
-rent charge of £10, payable by each of the two Societies. In 1673 these
-rents were extinguished by purchase by the two Societies.
-
-This patent of James I. is the only existing formal document concerning
-the relations between the Crown and the Inns, though it would be strange
-indeed if no other grant or patent ever existed. It is preserved in the
-Church in a chest kept beneath the Communion Table, which can only be
-opened by the keys held by the two Treasurers. The importance of the
-patent is, for the purpose of our investigation, that it is based almost
-certainly upon documents that have disappeared, but which reached back
-to the original conveyance, and it shows that there were two separate
-parcels, exacting two separate rents. Moreover, it provided that _each_
-Society should continue to pay a rental of £10. Now, if these two
-Societies represented a division of the one parent body which had come
-from Thavye’s Inn and held the _whole_ Inner and Middle Temple at a
-rent of £10, it is hardly conceivable that when this supposed division
-took place, each Society should have continued to pay the whole rent.
-The first thing they would have divided, after dividing themselves,
-would surely have been that rent of £10.[16]
-
-That the theory of a division having taken place early caused much
-wonderment is shown by a report that was rife in the seventeenth
-century. This ‘report’ was to the effect that the division arose from
-the sides taken by the Lawyers in the Wars of the Roses. Those wars,
-however, took place after the date when there is evidence of the
-existence of the two Societies. The ‘report’ represents an attempt to
-explain the existence of the two Societies when their origin was already
-forgotten, and was perhaps suggested by the fact that it was in the
-Temple Gardens that Shakespeare placed the famous incident that led to
-the Wars of the Roses:
-
- ‘PLANTAGENET. Let him that is a true-born gentleman,
- And stands upon the honour of his birth,
- If he suppose that I have pleaded truth,
- From off this briar pluck a white rose with me.
-
- ‘SOMERSET. Let him that is no coward, nor no flatterer,
- But dare maintain the party of the truth,
- Pluck a red rose from off this thorn with me.
-
- ‘WARWICK. This brawl to-day,
- Grown to this faction in the Temple Garden,
- Shall send, between the red rose and the white,
- A thousand souls to death and deadly night.’
-
-In 1732, in order to put an end to many questions of property, an
-elaborate deed of partition was agreed to by the two Inns, and forms the
-final authority upon what belongs to each.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER III
-
-THE TEMPLE CHURCH
-
-
-It is natural to turn from this story of the Templars to the Round
-Church in the Temple, which is their chief memorial. We leave the roar
-and rattle of Fleet Street, and pass through the low Gateway of the
-Inner Temple into the narrow lane which leads us between the gross
-modern buildings, called after Oliver Goldsmith and Dr. Johnson, to the
-west end of the Church--the west end, which is formed by the round
-building which we have already mentioned.
-
-The Gate-House beneath which we have passed is in itself a building of
-no ordinary interest. It is, as we now see it, a modern (1905) version
-of an old timber and rough-cast house, with projecting upper stories,
-pleasantly contrasting with the Palladian splendour of the adjoining
-Bank. It was built ‘over and beside the gateway and the lane’ in 1610 by
-one John Bennett, and was perhaps designed by Inigo Jones. The room on
-the first floor was, there is every reason to suppose, used by the
-Prince of Wales as his Council Chamber for the Duchy of Cornwall. It
-contains some fine Jacobean and Georgian panelling, an admirable
-eighteenth-century staircase, and an elaborate and beautiful Jacobean
-plaster ceiling, with the initials, motto, and feathers of Prince Henry,
-who died 1612.
-
-This is No. 17, Fleet Street. No. 16, to the west of it, with the sign
-of the Pope’s Head, was the shop of Bernard Lintot, who published Pope’s
-‘Homer,’ and later of Jacob Robinson, the bookseller and publisher, with
-whom Edmund Burke lodged when ‘eating his dinners’ as a student of the
-Middle Temple.
-
-The Gate-House escaped the Fire of London, and, having been restored, is
-now preserved to the public use by the London County Council.[17] It
-forms an appropriate introduction to those narrow lanes and quiet Courts
-and that lovely Church, whose pavements once resounded with the tread of
-the mail-clad champions of Christendom, and echo now with the softer
-footfall of bewigged, begowned Limbs of the Law. Dull and prosaic must
-he be indeed who cannot here feel the thrill of imagination which
-stirred the soul of Tom Pinch as he wandered through these Courts:
-
-‘Every echo of his footsteps sounded to him like a sound from the old
-walls and pavements, wanting language to relate the histories of the
-dim, dismal rooms; to tell him what lost documents were decaying in
-forgotten corners of the shut-up cellars, from whose lattices such
-mouldy sighs came breathing forth as he went past; to whisper of dark
-bins of rare old wine, bricked up in vaults among the old foundations of
-the Halls; or mutter in a lower tone yet darker legends of the
-cross-legged knights, whose marble effigies were in the Church’ (‘Martin
-Chuzzlewit’).
-
-The Round part of the Church of the Knights Templars, which we now see
-lying below us, is one of the very few instances of Norman work left in
-London--the only instance, save the superb fragments of St.
-Bartholomew’s Church and the splendid whole of the Tower of London. It
-was dedicated, as we have seen, in 1185 to St. Mary by Heraclius,
-Patriarch of Jerusalem. This fact was recorded on a stone over the door,
-engraved in the time of Elizabeth, and said by Stow to be an
-
-[Illustration: INTERIOR OF THE TEMPLE CHURCH
-
-A ROUND CHURCH of the Order of Knights Templars (dedicated in 1185). The
-oblong nave is seen through the pillars of polished Purbeck marble
-(1240).]
-
-accurate copy of an older one. It also proclaimed an Indulgence of sixty
-days to annual visitors, the earliest known example, I believe, of this
-particular form of taxation. The Church was again dedicated in 1240. The
-rectangular portion of the Church, the Eastern portion added to the
-Western Round, was now probably reconstructed, supplanting a former
-chancel or choir, just at the period when the new Pointed style had
-ousted the round Norman.
-
-The circular type of church is not peculiar to the Order of Templars, as
-we have seen, or even to the Christians, but the choice of it was due in
-this case to the practice of imitating the architecture, as the
-topography, of the Holy Places at Jerusalem. In England, Round Churches
-occur at Ludlow and Cambridge (1101), built before the Knights of the
-Temple were established. St. Sepulchre at Northampton is possibly a
-Templar Church, but the Round Church at Little Maplestead in Essex
-belongs to the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and was built by the
-Knights Hospitallers.
-
-The Temple Church escaped the Fire of London as by a miracle, for the
-flames came as near as the Master’s House at the East End. It escaped
-the fire of 1678, when the old Chapel[18] of St. Anne, once perhaps the
-scene of the initiation of the Knights Templars, lying at the junction
-of Round and Rectangle, was destroyed by gunpowder to save the church.
-But it could not escape the destroying hands of the nineteenth-century
-Goths. For here, between 1824 and 1840, the great Gothic Revivalists
-indulged in one of their most ineffable and ineffaceable triumphs of
-intemperate enthusiasm. The Round part of the Church was almost rebuilt,
-and the old carvings were supplanted by inferior modern work. The
-conical roof was added; the horrid battlements banished. The old marble
-columns were removed and replaced by new ones, to obtain which the old
-Purbeck quarries were reopened. This marble takes an extraordinarily
-high polish, and presents a surface so clean and lustrous as to be
-almost shocking in its contrast to our dingy London atmosphere, and
-buildings begrimed with dirt and soot.
-
-The many brasses, which Camden praised, have disappeared; the rich
-collection of tablets and monuments and inscribed gravestones that once
-pleased the eye of Pepys, and formed a feast of heraldic ornament, has
-been dispersed, and found sanctuary in the tiny Churchyard without, on
-the north side of the Church, or in the Triforium. The floor of the
-Church was, at the same time, wisely lowered to its original level, and
-covered with a pavement of tiles designed after the pattern of the
-remains of old ones found there, or in the Chapter House of Westminster.
-
-A continuous stone bench, or sedile, which runs round the base of the
-walls was added at this period, together with the delightful arcade
-above it, with grotesque and other heads in the spandrels. The wheel
-window--a lovely thing--was uncovered and filled with stained glass, and
-the windows in the circular aisle of the Round have since been filled by
-Mr. Charles Winston with stained glass which is good, but the colour of
-which it is absurd to compare, as Mr. Baylis does, with the blues and
-rubies of the glass of the best period. It is to be hoped that the
-remaining windows will not be filled with coloured glass, as Mr.
-Baylis[19] suggests, for the interior of the Round is too dark already.
-
-The result of all this Gothic reconstruction is that, save for the old
-rough stones in the exterior Round walls, and some of the ornate
-semicircular arches, the Templars’ Church exists no more. The grandeur,
-beauty, and historical interest of their building can be gathered now
-from old engravings only; the monuments of many famous men, in judicial
-robes and with shields rich in heraldry, a representative gallery of
-unbroken centuries, which once crowded its floors, must be judged by
-broken and scattered fragments. What we have is a reconstruction such as
-the Restorers chose to give us--that is, a light and very pleasing Early
-English interior, fitted into a Round Norman exterior, beneath the
-remaining arcade of round arches and windows.[20]
-
-If the enthusiasm of the Restorers, however, led them to destroy so that
-we can never forgive them for having taken from us original work for the
-sake of indulging their own fancy, yet it is evident that there was
-much for them legitimately to undo. There were plaster and stucco, and
-dividing gallery and whitewashed ceiling, and all the usual horrors of
-the eighteenth century, to be got rid of. The graves and monuments were
-historically interesting, but they crowded the little church unbearably.
-And at least the Restorers have given us beautiful work of their own,
-and a seemly and beautiful sanctuary worthy of the place.
-
-The Round is entered by a western door--a massive oaken door superbly
-hung upon enormous hinges, quite modern. It closes beneath a
-semicircular arch enriched by deeply-recessed columns with foliated
-capitals of the transitional Norman style, though all this work, like
-the Gothic Porch which contains it, is modern restoration. The scene as
-we enter the Church is one of striking singularity. Near at hand is the
-arcaded sedile about the walls of the Round, and through six clustered
-columns of great elegance, made of polished Purbeck marble, which
-support the dome, we catch a glimpse of the polished marble columns in
-the Choir, the lancet windows in the North and South walls, and the
-three stained windows of the East End, beneath which the gilded Reredos
-glitters. And through the painted windows of the Round itself the light
-strikes upon a wonderful series of monumental recumbent figures, some of
-which are made of this flashing Purbeck marble too. It is a strange,
-unforgettable sight, that summons up unbidden the vision of the
-Red-Cross Knights, to the tread of whose mailed feet these pavements
-rang, when, beneath their baucéant banners, they gathered here to the
-Dedication of their Temple.
-
-These monuments, though re-arranged and restored indeed by Richardson,
-1840, are still of great interest. Nine only out of eleven formerly
-mentioned remain. Two groups of four each lie beneath the Dome, with the
-ninth close by the South wall, balancing a stone coffin near the North.
-Two of them belong to the twelfth century and seven to the thirteenth,
-and these silent figures wear the armour of that period--the chain mail
-and long surcoats, the early goad spurs, the long shields and swords,
-the belts, and mufflers of mail.
-
-The Monuments in the Temple Church have been frequently described, by
-Stow and Weever, for instance, by Dugdale,[21] and by Gough.[22] The
-tradition that they represent ‘ancient British Kings,’ or even
-necessarily Templars, has been long exploded. The theory that every
-figure whose legs are crossed in effigy belonged to that Order has been
-consigned to the limbo of vulgar errors. But five of these effigies are
-mentioned by Stow as being of armed Knights ‘lying cross-legged as men
-vowed to the Holy Land, against the infidels and unbelieving Jews.’ And
-it is very probable that cross-legs did indicate those who had either
-undertaken a Crusade or vowed themselves to the Holy Land. At any rate,
-I know no evidence to show that this was _not_ the symbolism by which
-the medieval mason in England and Ireland chose to indicate the
-Crusader.
-
-None of these remarkable monuments can with certainty be identified. Of
-those now grouped upon the South side Stow says: ‘The first of the
-crosse-legged was W. Marshall, the elder Earl of Pembroke, who died
-1219; Wil. Marshall, his son, the second, and Gilbert Marshall, his
-brother, also Earl of Pembroke, slayne in a tournament at Hertford,
-besides Ware,’ in 1241. And this may or may not be so. The fourth is
-nameless; the fifth, near the wall, is possibly that of Sir Robert
-Rosse, who, according to Stow, was buried here.
-
-Of the group upon the North side, only that of the cross-legged knight
-in a coat of mail and a round helmet flattened on top, whose head rests
-on a cushion, and whose long, pointed shield is charged with an
-escarbuncle on a diapered field, can with any probability be named. For
-these are the arms of Mandeville (_de Magnavilla_)--‘quarterly, or and
-gules, an escarbuncle, sable’--and this monument of Sussex marble gives
-us the first example of arms upon a sepulchral figure in England.[23] It
-is supposed to be the effigy of Geoffrey Mandeville, whom Stephen made
-first Earl of Essex, and Matilda Constable of the Tower. A ferocious and
-turbulent knight, he received an arrow-wound at last in an attack upon
-Burwell Castle, and was carried off by the Templars to die. But, as he
-died under sentence of excommunication, it is said that they hung his
-body in a lead coffin upon a tree in the Old Temple Orchard, until
-absolution had been obtained for him from the Pope. Then they brought
-him to the new Temple and buried him there (1182).
-
-The Choir, or rectangular part of the Church, of which the nave is
-broader than the aisles, but of the same height, is a beautiful example
-of the Early English style, and is lighted by five lancet triplet
-windows. By the Restorers the old panelling and the beautiful
-seventeenth-century Reredos were removed. Tiers of deplorable pews,
-deplorably arranged, and a very feeble Gothic Reredos[24] were
-substituted. The roof, supported by the Purbeck marble clustered columns
-that culminate in richly-moulded capitals, was painted with shields and
-mottoes in painstaking imitation of the thirteenth century. The windows
-at the East End were filled with very inferior modern stained glass,
-none of it of the least interest, poor in colour and wretchedly ignorant
-in design--ignorant, that is, of the rules which guided the art of the
-medieval glazier.
-
-A bust of the ‘Judicious’ Hooker, Master of the Temple Church, and
-author of the ‘Ecclesiastical Polity,’ the grave of Selden near the
-South-West corner of the Choir, and above it a mural tablet to his
-memory, are the monuments of known men most worthy of attention. The
-fine fourteenth-century sepulchral effigy near the double piscina of
-Purbeck marble is supposed to be that of Silvester de Everden, Bishop of
-Carlisle.
-
-The Organ, frequently reconstructed and finally renewed by Forster and
-Andrews, 1882, has been famous for generations. It was originally built
-by Bernard Schmidt. Dr. Blow and Purcell, his pupil, played upon it in
-competition with that built by Harris. The decision of this Battle of
-the Organs was referred to the famous, or infamous, Lord Chief Justice
-Jeffreys, who was a good musician, and in this matter, at least, seems
-to have proved himself a good Judge.
-
-The _Triforium_[25] is reached by a small Norman door in the North-West
-corner of the oblong. A winding staircase leads to the Penitential
-Cell--4 feet long, by 2 feet 6 inches wide--where many of the Knights
-were confined. To the Triforium many tablets and monuments (_e.g._, of
-Plowden), once in the Church below, have been removed.
-
-Among the epitaphs in brass, quoted at length by Dugdale, is one in
-memory of John White:
-
- ‘Here lieth a John, a burning, shining light;
- His name, life, actions, were all White.’
-
-The Templars’ Church was equally divided between the two Societies of
-Lawyers from ‘East to West, the North Aisle to the Middle, the South
-
-[Illustration: THE EAST END OF THE TEMPLE CHURCH AND THE MASTER’S
-HOUSE]
-
-to the Inner Temple.’ This fact, with many others, clearly indicates the
-basis of perfect equality upon which the two Societies were agreed to
-stand, and on which, in spite of subsequent claims to precedence on the
-part of both, declared groundless by judicial authority, they will
-henceforth continue. As to the Round, it appears to have been used by
-both Societies in common, largely as a place of business, like the
-Parvis of St. Paul’s, where lawyers congregated, and contracts were
-concluded. Butler refers to this custom in his ‘Hudibras’:
-
- ‘Walk the Round with Knights o’ the Posts
- About the cross-legged Knights, their hosts,
- Or wait for customers between
- The pillar rows in Lincoln’s Inn.’
- BUTLER: _Hudibras_.
-
-Joint property of the two Societies, also, is that exquisite example of
-Georgian domestic architecture, the Master’s House (1764). This perfect
-model of a Gentleman’s Town-House owes its great charm almost entirely
-to its beautiful proportions, and to the appropriate material of good
-red brick and stone of which it is built. It is a thousand pities that
-blue slates have been allowed to supplant the good red tiles that should
-form the roof. The House itself is the successor of one which was
-erected (1700) after the Great Fire.[26] The original Lodge is said to
-have been upon the site of the present Garden, directly in line with the
-east end of the Church. In the vaults beneath this Garden many Benchers
-of both Inns have been laid to rest.
-
-In this Lodge, then, dwells the Master of the Temple Church.
-
-‘There are certain buildings,’ says Camden, ‘on the east part of the
-Churchyard, in part whereof he hath his lodgings, and the rest he
-letteth out to students. His dyet he hath in either House, at the upper
-end of the Bencher’s Table, except in the time of reading, it then being
-the Reader’s place. Besides the Master, there is a Reader, who readeth
-Divine Service each morning and evening, for which he hath his salary
-from the Master.’
-
-A Custos of the Church had been appointed by the Knights Hospitallers,
-but after the Dissolution of the Monasteries the presentation of the
-office was reserved to the Crown. The Church is not within the Bishop’s
-jurisdiction. On appointment by the Crown, the Master is admitted
-forthwith without any institution or induction. But the Master of the
-Temple Church is Master of nothing else. When, in the reign of James
-I., Dr. Micklethwaite laid claim to wider authority, the Benchers of
-both Temples succeeded in proving to the Attorney-General that his
-jurisdiction was confined to his Church.
-
-Masters of real eminence have been few. By far the greatest was the
-learned Dr. John Hooker, appointed by Elizabeth, who resigned in 1591.
-Dr. John Gauden, who claimed to have written the ‘Eikon Basilike,’ was
-Master of the Temple before he became Bishop of Exeter and Worcester.
-And in our own day Canon Ainger added to the charm of a singularly
-attractive personality the accomplishments of a scholar who devoted much
-of his time to the works of another devout lover of the Temple--Charles
-Lamb.
-
-The Church was once connected with the Old Hall by Cloisters,
-communicating with the Chapel of St. Thomas that once stood outside the
-north door of it, and with the Refectory of the Priests, a room with
-groined arches and corbels at the west end of the present Inner Temple
-Hall, which still survives (see p. 48). Later on, Chambers were built
-over the Cloisters, and the Church itself was almost stifled by the
-shops and chambers that were allowed to cluster about it, along the
-South Wall, and even over the Porch. Beneath the shelter of these
-Cloisters the Students of the Law were wont to walk, in order to ‘bolt’
-or discuss points of law, whilst ‘all sorts of witnesses Plied in the
-Temple under trees.’
-
-The Fire of 1678 burnt down the old Cloisters and other buildings at the
-south-west extremity of the Church. The present Cloisters at that angle,
-designed by Wren, were rebuilt in 1681, as a Tablet proudly proclaims.
-
-The Cloister Court is completed by Lamb Building, which, though
-apparently within the bounds of the Inner Temple, belongs (by purchase)
-to the Middle Temple, and is named from the badge of that Inn, the Agnus
-Dei, which figures over the characteristic entrance of this delightful
-Jacobean building, and has now given its title to the whole Court. Here
-lived that brilliant Oriental Scholar, Sir William Jones, sharing
-chambers with the eccentric author of ‘Sandford and Merton,’ Thomas Day.
-And it was to the attics of these buildings, where Pen and Warrington
-dwelt, that Major Pendennis groped his way through the fog, piloted, as
-he might be to-day, ‘by a civil personage with a badge and white apron
-through some dark alleys and under various melancholy archways into
-courts each more dismal than the other.’[27]
-
-The consecrated nature of their tenement resulted in certain
-inconveniences to the Lawyers. On the one hand, the Temple was a place
-of Sanctuary, and its character suffered accordingly. Debtors,
-criminals, and dissolute persons flocked to it as a refuge, so that it
-became necessary to issue orders of Council (1614) that the Inns should
-be searched for strangers at regular intervals, whilst, with the vain
-view of reserving the precincts for none but lawyers, it was ordained
-that ‘no gentleman foreigner or discontinuer’ should lodge therein, so
-that the Inns might not be converted into ‘taverns’ (_diversoria_). On
-the other hand, the benevolence of the Benchers was taxed by many
-unnatural or unfortunate parents, who used the Temple as a crèche, and
-left their babies at its doors. The records give many instances of
-payments made towards the support of such infants, who were frequently
-given the ‘place-name’ of Temple.
-
-I have quoted from Thackeray a phrase not so over-complimentary to the
-surroundings of Lamb Building.
-
-But now, before passing on to the story of the Halls of these renowned
-Societies, and the Chambers which have harboured so many famous men, I
-must quote, as an introduction, the passage in which the novelist makes
-amends, and nobly sums up the spirit of the life men lead there, and the
-atmosphere of strenuous work and literary tradition which lightens those
-‘dismal courts’ and ‘bricky towers.’
-
-‘Nevertheless, those venerable Inns which have the “Lamb and Flag” and
-the “Winged Horse” for their ensigns have attractions for persons who
-inhabit them, and a share of rough comforts and freedom, which men
-always remember with pleasure. I don’t know whether the student of law
-permits himself the refreshment of enthusiasm, or indulges in poetical
-reminiscences as he passes by historical chambers, and says, “Yonder
-Eldon lived; upon this site Coke mused upon Lyttelton; here Chitty
-toiled; here Barnwell and Alderson joined in their famous labours; here
-Byles composed his great work upon bills, and Smith compiled his
-immortal leading cases; here Gustavus still toils with Solomon to aid
-him.” But the man of letters can’t but love the place which has been
-inhabited by so many of his brethren or peopled by their creations, as
-real to us at this day as the authors whose children they were; and Sir
-Roger de Coverley walking in the Temple Gardens, and discoursing with
-Mr. Spectator about the beauties in hoops and patches who are sauntering
-over the grass, is just as lively a figure to me as old Samuel Johnson
-rolling through the fog with the Scotch Gentleman at his heels, on their
-way to Dr. Goldsmith’s chambers in Brick Court, or Harry Fielding, with
-inked ruffles and a wet towel round his head, dashing off articles at
-midnight for the _Covent Garden Journal_, while the printer’s boy is
-asleep in the passage.’[28]
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IV
-
-THE MIDDLE TEMPLE
-
-
-The passage I have quoted from Thackeray at the end of the last chapter
-shadows forth eloquently enough something of the feeling of respect and
-awe which the young barrister--and even those who are not young
-barristers--may naturally feel for the precincts within which the great
-English Lawyers lived and worked--the Inns of Court, where the splendid
-fabric of English Law was gradually built up, ‘not without dust and
-heat.’
-
-But for most laymen the Temple and its sister Inns have other and
-perhaps more obvious charms. For as we pass by unexpected avenues into
-‘the magnificent ample squares and classic green recesses’ of the
-Temple, they seem to be bathed in the rich afterglow of suns that have
-set, the light which never was on sea or land, shed by the glorious
-associations connected with some of the greatest names in English
-literature. Here, we remember, by fond tradition Geoffrey Chaucer is
-reputed to have lived. Here Oliver Goldsmith worked and died, and here
-his mortal remains were laid to rest. Here, within hail of his beloved
-Fleet Street, Dr. Johnson dwelt, and Blackstone wrote his famous
-‘Commentaries.’ Here the gentle Elia was born. Hither possibly came
-Shakespeare to superintend the production of ‘Twelfth Night.’ Here, in
-the Inner Temple Hall, was acted the first English tragedy, ‘Gorboduc;
-or Ferrex and Porrex,’ a bloodthirsty play, by Thomas Sackville, Lord
-High Treasurer of England, and Thomas Norton, both members of the Inner
-Temple. And hither, to witness these or other performances, came the
-Virgin Queen.
-
-The main entrance to the Middle Temple is the gateway from Fleet Street,
-scene of many a bonfire lit of yore by Inns of Court men on occasions of
-public rejoicing.[29] This characteristic building, of red brick and
-Portland stone, with a classical pediment, was designed by Sir
-Christopher Wren, and built, as an inscription records, in 1684. An old
-iron gas-lamp hangs above the arch, beneath the sign of the Middle
-Temple Lamb.
-
-Wren’s noble gate-house replaced a Tudor building, erected, according to
-tradition, by Sir Amias Paulet, who, being forbidden--so Cavendish[30]
-tells the story--to leave London without license by Cardinal Wolsey,
-‘lodged in this Gate-house, which he re-edified and sumptuously
-beautified on the outside with the Cardinal’s Arms, Hat, Cognisance,
-Badges, and other devices, in a glorious manner,’ to appease him. The
-fact seems to be that this old Gateway was built in the ordinary way
-when one Sir Amisius Pawlett was Treasurer.[31]
-
-Adjoining this Gateway is Child’s Bank, where King Charles himself once
-banked, and Nell Gwynne and Prince Rupert, whose jewels were disposed of
-in a lottery by the firm. Part of this building covers the site of the
-famous Devil’s Tavern, which boasted the sign of St. Dunstan--patron of
-the Church so near at hand--tweaking the devil’s nose. Here Ben Jonson
-drank the floods of Canary that inspired his plays; hither to the sanded
-floor of the Apollo club-room came those boon companions of his who
-desired to be ‘sealed of the tribe of Ben,’ and here, in after-years,
-Dr. Johnson loved to foregather, and Swift with Addison, Steele with
-Bickerstaff.
-
-Immediately within the Gateway, on the left, is
-
-[Illustration: THE MIDDLE TEMPLE GATEHOUSE IN FLEET STREET
-
-IT stands on the south side close to the site of Temple Bar, was
-designed by Sir Christopher Wren, and built in 1684.]
-
-an old and very picturesque stationer’s shop, belonging to the firm of
-Abram and Sons, in whose family it has been since 1774. It is much more
-than a stationer’s shop, for Messrs. Abram have accumulated in the
-course of years a very valuable and interesting collection of old deeds
-and documents and prints. The overhanging stories of the house rest upon
-a row of slender iron pillars--pillars which Dr. Johnson used to touch
-with superstitious reverence each time he passed, in unconscious
-continuation of that ancient pillar-worship of which many traces linger,
-for those who have eyes to see, about the Temple and St. Paul’s. We are
-now in Middle Temple Lane, the narrow street down which the citizens of
-London were wont to hurry in order to take boat to Westminster from the
-Temple Stairs, in the days when the River was the highway between the
-City and the Court, between London and Westminster, the counting-houses
-of the merchants and the palace and abbey of the King. Of late years the
-introduction of tramways and of motor traffic on the Embankment has
-tended largely to revive the popularity of the old route, though not all
-the thousands of pounds squandered by the London County Council upon an
-ill-considered scheme of steamboats could induce the Londoner to adopt
-again the water-way, which the bend of the River and the tide must make
-slow. Next below us on the left is the group of chambers called Hare
-Court, a plain to ugly, red-brick to stock-brick barracks, through which
-one can reach the Temple Church. Beyond, on the right, we come to what
-remains of Brick Court. This is a most charming specimen of the Queen
-Anne style. An inscription over the doorway of No. 3, _Phœnicis
-instar revivisco_, informs us that it rose like the Phœnix from its
-ashes in 1704. But in this present year of Grace (1909), an old brick
-building has been removed, which fronted the Hall and the Lane, and
-which claimed to be the oldest building left in the Temple, the first
-constructed of brick, erected there in Elizabeth’s reign, and referred
-to by Spenser in the lines of his ‘Prothalamion’:--
-
- ‘Those bricky towres,
- The which on Themmes brode aged backe doe ryde,
- Where now the studious lawyers have their bowers,
- There whylome wont the Templar Knights to byde,
- Till they decayed thro’ pride.’
-
-There is nothing, however, to prove that Spenser was referring to Brick
-Court. The ‘Prothalamion’ was published in 1596; and I would suggest
-that the phrase ‘bricky towres’ might apply most naturally to the Middle
-Temple Hall.
-
-Of all the Chambers in the Inns of Court rich in reminiscences of famous
-men, none are so redolent of literary fame as No. 2, Brick Court. We
-cannot, as Thackeray[32] wrote, who himself, like Winthrop Mackworth
-Praed, had chambers here, pass without emotion ‘the staircase which
-Johnson, Burke, and Reynolds trod to see their friend, their kind
-Goldsmith--the stair on which the poor women sat weeping bitterly when
-they heard that the greatest and most generous of all men was dead
-within the black oak door.’
-
-Not the Temple, but No. 6, Wine Office Court, nearly opposite the
-Cheshire Cheese, was the scene of Dr. Johnson’s famous rescue of the
-author of ‘The Vicar of Wakefield,’ who had been arrested by his
-landlady for his rent, and sent for his friend in great distress. ‘I
-sent him a guinea,’ says Johnson, ‘and promised to come to him
-directly.... I perceived that he had already changed my guinea, and had
-a bottle of Madeira and a glass before him. I put the cork into the
-bottle, desired he would be calm, and began to talk to him of the means
-by which he might be extricated. He then told me that he had a novel
-ready for the press. I looked into it, and saw its merit; told the
-landlady I should soon return, and, having gone to a bookseller, sold it
-for sixty pounds.’
-
-Goldsmith left Wine Office Court and lodged for a while in Gray’s Inn,
-and thence migrated to some humble Chambers upon the site of No. 2,
-Garden Court, Middle Temple (1764). These buildings have disappeared.
-But the success of his play, ‘The Good-Natured Man,’ for which he
-received £500, enabled him to launch forth into more splendid
-apartments. He purchased the lease of No. 2, Brick Court, which still
-stands as he left it, for £400. He furnished his rooms with mahogany and
-Wilton carpets, and, bedecking himself in a suit of ‘Tyrian bloom satin
-grain,’ prepared to entertain his most aristocratic acquaintances.
-Johnson, Percy, Reynolds, Bickerstaff, and a host of other friends of
-either sex, climbed those stairs to the rooms on the second floor on the
-right-hand side (‘two pair right’), were entertained to dinners and
-suppers, much to the discomposure of the studious Blackstone, who,
-painfully compiling his great ‘Commentaries’ in the chambers below,
-found good cause to grumble at the racket made by ‘his revelling
-neighbour.’[33] And some years later the staircase that led to the rooms
-of that most lovable of geniuses was crowded by friends, ‘mourners of
-all ranks and conditions of life, conspicuous among them being the
-outcasts of both sexes, who loved and wept for him because of the
-goodness he had done.’[34] For from these rooms, one April afternoon,
-the mortal remains of Oliver Goldsmith were borne forth, to be buried
-somewhere on the north side of the Temple Church. The exact spot is not
-known, but as near to it as can be ascertained a plain gravestone now
-bears the inscription (1860): ‘Here lies Oliver Goldsmith.’ The
-Goldsmith Buildings, that run parallel to the north side of the Church,
-belong, like Lamb Buildings, somewhat unexpectedly to the Middle Temple,
-but they have no immediate connection with Oliver Goldsmith.
-
-The bedroom in Goldsmith’s Chambers Thackeray describes as a mere
-closet, but he commented upon the excellence of the carved woodwork in
-the rooms. The windows looked upon a rookery, which for long flourished
-in the elm-trees, since cut down, which gave their name to Elm Court.
-Gazing upon this colony, Goldsmith, in the intervals of composing his
-‘Traveller’ or ‘Deserted Village,’ would note their ways, and so
-recorded them in his ‘Animated Nature’:[35] ‘The rook builds in the
-neighbourhood of man, and sometimes makes choice of groves in the very
-midst of cities for the place of its retreat and security. In these it
-establishes a kind of legal constitution, by which all intruders are
-excluded from coming to live among them, and none suffered to build but
-acknowledged natives of the place. I have often amused myself with
-observing their plan of policy from my window in the Temple, that looks
-upon a grove where they have made a colony in the midst of the City....’
-
-In recent years many of the brightest ornaments of the English Bar have
-had Chambers in Brick Court, including Lord Coleridge, Lord Bowen, Lord
-Russell, and Sir William Anson. There is a sundial in this Court--one of
-the many for which the Inn is famous--from which Goldsmith may often
-have taken the hour. It warns us that Time and Tide tarry for no man,
-and took the place (1704) of one that bore the motto, ‘Begone about your
-business,’ of which the story goes that it was a Bencher’s curt
-dismissal of a Mason who asked him for the motto to be engraved thereon.
-
-The Buildings in the Inns grew up in haphazard fashion. They were
-erected by individual members or Benchers at their own cost, and
-interspersed with stalls and shops, with the sanction of the Benchers.
-The builders were granted the right of calling their blocks of chambers
-after their own names, if they chose, and of nominating a certain number
-of successors from among members of the Society, who might become
-tenants without paying rent to the Inn.
-
-To this haphazard method of building, and to the influence of numerous
-fires, is due the devious labyrinth of little Courts, the inextricable
-maze of blocks of Chambers, which lie upon our left as we descend Middle
-Temple Lane, and which lend so peculiar a character to the Temple Inns.
-Pump Court, Elm Court, Fig-Tree Court, which fill the spaces between the
-Lane and Wren’s Cloisters and the Inner Temple Hall, owe their irregular
-shape to these causes, and their titles to the chief features of the
-plots about which they were built.
-
-First comes Pump Court, where Henry Fielding, the novelist, and Cowper,
-the poet, once had chambers. Upon its old brick walls is a sundial with
-its warning motto: ‘Shadows we are, and like shadows depart.’[36] The
-great fire of 1679, which damaged the Middle Temple far more than the
-Fire of London, broke out at midnight in Pump Court. It raged for twelve
-hours. The Thames was frozen, and barrels of ale, so tradition runs,
-were broached to feed the pumping engines in lieu of water. Pump Court,
-Elm-Tree Court, Vine Court, the Cloisters, and part of Brick Court were
-consumed. The Church and Middle Temple Hall were only saved by the
-timely use of gunpowder, a device that had been found effective in the
-Great Fire of 1666.
-
-Elm Court Buildings, as they now are, date from 1880. They are built of
-good red brick and stone, but marred by feeble Renaissance ornament.
-They boast a sundial, facing the Lane, which proclaims that the years
-pass and are reckoned--_pereunt et imputantur_. The Middle Temple Lane
-ends in the atrocities of the nineteenth century: between the walls of
-the feeble Harcourt Buildings, the stock-brick ugliness of Plowden
-Buildings, which have rather less architectural charm than a
-soap-factory, and in the dreadful Temple Gardens and the Gateway which
-opens upon the Embankment, a gross abomination of florid ugliness.
-
-On the right, below Brick Court, beneath a gas-lamp raised upon a
-graceful iron arch, some steps
-
-[Illustration: FOUNTAIN COURT AND MIDDLE TEMPLE HALL]
-
-lead us to a raised pavement, dotted with a few plane-trees, beyond
-which lies the Fountain. This pavement is the forecourt of the Middle
-Temple Hall, a building which, in spite of restorations and recasings
-and counter-restorations, remains of unique and unsurpassed interest.
-For now that Crosby Hall is to be translated, it is the only building
-left _in situ_ in London which can be directly and certainly connected
-with William Shakespeare. The Middle Temples had an ancient Hall between
-Pump Court and Elm Court, the west end of which abutted upon Middle
-Temple Lane. This was superseded in 1572 by the present famous building.
-
- ‘Gray’s Inn for walks,
- Lincoln’s Inn for a wall,
- The Inner Temple for a garden,
- And the Middle for a Hall.’
-
-The old doggerel lines fairly sum up the features of the Inns. And this
-lovely Hall of the Middle Temple, whose proportions are so fair--it is
-100 feet by 42 feet by 47 feet high--produces a delightful impression of
-space and lightness. A magnificent timber roof with Elizabethan
-hammer-beams harmonizes with the rich panelling, on which are painted
-the arms of ‘Readers,’ and the gorgeous carving of the Renaissance
-Screen, which was erected in 1574, some fourteen years before the date
-of the Spanish Armada, from the spoils of which fond tradition says it
-was constructed.
-
-The Hall is very rich in heraldry, and has some interesting portraits,
-chiefly of royal personages. Above the Bench Table hangs Van Dyck’s
-portrait of Charles I. The windows illustrate the survival of Gothic
-detail long after other details had passed into the Italian style. The
-points are very slight, but contrast sharply enough with the Renaissance
-curves and pendent roof. There is some modern stained glass, tolerable
-in colour, but incongruous in style.
-
-Parliament Chamber and the Benchers’ rooms are approached through old
-carved oak doors, relics of the old Hall in Pump Court.
-
-The Entrance Tower was designed by Savage (1831): the Louvre was
-restored by Hakewill. An oil-painting, attributed to Hogarth, of the
-Hall Court, with the Entrance Tower of the Hall in its ancient state, is
-to be seen in the Benchers’ Committee Room of the Inner Temple.
-
-One of the most splendid Refectories in England, comparable to the Hall
-of Christ Church at Oxford, this noble room adds to the charm of its
-beauty the charm of a literary memorial. For from this stage the
-exquisite poetry and gentle fun of Shakespeare’s ‘Twelfth Night’ first
-fell upon the ears of the listening lawyers upon occasion of a Christmas
-Revel three hundred years ago. Here Shakespeare himself, we must
-believe, has trodden; those rafters rang once with the poet’s voice. For
-even if he did not act himself in his play that night of wonderful
-Post-Revels--and that, in spite of tradition, is indeed scarcely
-probable, for the dramas performed on these occasions were, as we have
-seen, acted by members of the Inn--yet it is more than probable that he
-would be employed as Stage-Manager for the occasion, and would take his
-natural part in rehearsing the play.
-
-It so happens that one John Manningham--a fellow-student, by the way, of
-John Pym--kept a diary of his residence in the Temple from 1601 to 1603.
-That diary has been preserved among the Harleian Manuscripts now in the
-British Museum. And on February, 160½, he made a note which will cause
-his name to live for ever. ‘At our feast,’ he wrote, ‘Wee had a play
-called “Twelve Night, or What you will,” much like the “Commedy of
-Errores,” or “Menechmi” in Plautus, but most like and neere to that in
-Italian called “Inganni.”[37]
-
-And to this stately Hall, we may be sure, came Elizabeth, surrounded by
-a brilliant group of statesmen, lawyers, sailors, to witness such plays,
-or perchance to lead the dance with some comely courtier like Sir
-Christopher Hatton. The connection of the Middle Temple with the great
-Elizabethan Admirals and Adventurers is indeed noteworthy.
-
-Sir Francis Drake was honourably received by the Benchers in this Hall
-after his victories in the West Indies (1586), and in the Hall, below
-the daïs, is a serving-table made out of the timber of his ship, the
-_Golden Hind_. He had been admitted, _honoris causa_, to the Society of
-the Inner Temple four years earlier. Other famous Elizabethan seamen
-were admitted at the Middle Temple in the persons of Sir Martin
-Frobisher, Admiral Norris, Sir Francis Vere (all in 1592), and Sir John
-Hawkins (1594). Taken in conjunction with the fact that Richard Hakluyt,
-the elder, was a Bencher of the Middle Temple; that Sir Walter Raleigh,
-who had been admitted to membership of the Inn in 1575, placed the
-expedition he sent out in 1602 under the command of Bartholomew Gosnold,
-another Middle Templar; that the records show that several members of
-the Middle Temple were interested in the early development of Virginia;
-and that the Inn possesses the only existing copy of the ‘Molyneux
-Globes,’ this and other indications seem to justify Mr. Bedwell’s
-contention[38] that ‘the colonizing enterprises of the closing years of
-the sixteenth century were closely associated with the Middle Temple,’
-and that on both sides of the Atlantic members of that Inn took a
-prominent part in the ‘birth of the American Nation.’
-
-This connection with the Colonies, natural, necessary and profitable
-both to those new countries, which thus obtained the services of
-educated men--Governors trained in knowledge of affairs, and
-Attorney-Generals imbued with the high traditions of English Law--and to
-the Inns themselves, which were thus kept in touch with the New World,
-is illustrated by the fact that the Middle Temple is represented by no
-less than five of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence. Of
-these, Thomas McKean is said to have written the Constitution of
-Delaware in a single night. And of the other four, Edward Rutledge,
-Thomas Lynch, Thomas Heyward, and Arthur Midleton--all Representatives
-of South Carolina--the first is believed to have drafted the greater
-part of the Constitution of that State, and was afterwards Chairman of
-the Committee of Five who drafted the first Constitution of the United
-States.
-
-Meanwhile the literary and dramatic tradition of the Middle Temple was
-continued by such members of the Society as Congreve, Wycherley, Ford,
-Sir Thomas Overbury, and Shadwell, King William’s Poet Laureate, who
-lives in Dryden’s Satire. Later, that tradition was continued by
-Sheridan, Thomas Moore, Thomas de Quincey, and Henry Hallam, the
-historian of the Middle Ages.
-
-Since 1688, when a change was made in the oath of supremacy, which, by a
-statute of 1563, all Utter Barristers were required to take, the names
-of the members of the Inns of Court who are entitled to practise in the
-Courts have been preserved in the Barristers’ Roll. Since 1868
-barristers have been excused the oath, but the Roll must still be signed
-after call to the Bar. The lists are kept in the Public Record Office.
-
-The names of eminence inscribed upon this wonderful Roll can only be
-hinted at here. The Middle Temple can boast such great lawyers as Edmund
-Plowden and Blackstone, and Lord Chancellors in Clarendon, Jeffreys (who
-was a student here, but called to the Bar at the Inner Temple), Somers,
-Cowper, and Eldon; whilst Mansfield, C.J., Lord Ashburton, Robert
-Gifford, Lord Stowell, Lord Campbell, Cockburn, the Norths, and the
-Pollocks, were men and lawyers of no less eminence. Nor must we omit to
-mention one whose undying fame was earned, not in the Courts, but in the
-Camp; for Sir Henry Havelock, the hero of Cawnpore and Lucknow, figured
-among the Templars ere he went to India. Of another kind of eminence was
-Elias Ashmole, the Antiquary, whose name lives at Oxford. In the
-destructive fire of 1678 he lost in his rooms at the Middle Temple his
-papers, books, and rich collection of coins and medals. His friend, John
-Evelyn, the diarist, also had rooms in the Middle Temple, in Essex
-Court, just over against the Hall Court (1640).
-
-The north wing of Essex Court, which forms part of Brick Court, was
-rebuilt in 1883;[39] the remainder of these charming brick buildings,
-with the Wigmaker’s shop, belong to the second half of the seventeenth
-century.
-
-Though the Gateway which leads to Middle Temple Lane is the grander,
-there is another entrance by ‘the little Gate,’ which is still more
-charming and characteristic. Screened by the tortuous ways of Devereux
-Court, an old wrought-iron gate opens onto an ancient and spacious
-quadrangle.
-
-As we stand beneath the old brick buildings of this ‘New Court’--so
-‘new’ that it was built by Sir Christopher Wren (1677)--the whole charm
-of the Temple scenery unfolds before our eyes, and we understand at once
-the ‘cheerful, liberal look of it’ which Charles Lamb loved.
-
-For below us lies the most unique and one of the loveliest views in
-London, a city of beautiful vistas. A flight of steps, framed by ancient
-iron standards bearing the sign of the Lamb, leads down to a Fountain in
-the centre of a broad paved terrace. And through the trees that shade it
-we catch glimpses of green lawns and flower-beds hedged about by Hall
-and Library and Chambers. Here still, beneath the shady trees--though
-Goldsmith’s rooks no longer caw in them--sparkles the water of the
-Temple Fountain, though the Fountain itself is not that which provoked
-Lamb’s wit, nor that which Dickens loved. It was through the smoky
-shrubs of Fountain Court that the delicate figure of Ruth Pinch flitted,
-in fulfilment of her little plot of assignation with Tom, who was always
-to come out of the Temple past the Fountain and look for her ‘down the
-steps leading into Garden Court,’ to be greeted ‘with the best little
-laugh upon her face that ever played in opposition to the Fountain, and
-beat it all to nothing. The Temple Fountain might have leaped twenty
-feet to greet the spring of hopeful maidenhood that in her person stole
-on, sparkling, through the dry and dusty channels of the Law; the
-chirping sparrows, bred in Temple chinks and crannies, might have held
-their peace to listen to imaginary skylarks, as so fresh a little
-creature passed; the dingy boughs, unused to droop, otherwise than in
-their puny growth, might have bent down in a kindred gracefulness, to
-shed their benedictions on her graceful head; old love letters, shut up
-in iron boxes in the neighbouring offices, and made of no account among
-the heaps of family papers into which they had strayed, and of which, in
-their degeneracy, they formed a part, might have stirred and fluttered
-with a moment’s recollection of their ancient tenderness, as she went
-lightly by.’[40]
-
-From the Fountain Terrace we look down upon a terraced garden framed by
-various blocks of buildings, which, if they do not group and harmonize
-so as to form a perfect whole, yet produce an effect which is quite
-singular and has a charm of its own. Beneath the Terrace, on the left
-the west end of the Hall abuts upon a green lawn; on the right a flight
-of steps leads down to a path which skirts the not unpleasing gabled
-façade, in red brick and stone, of the Garden Court (1883). Facing us
-now, are the steps which lead up to the embattled Lobby of the Library,
-beneath which an archway leads to the Library Chambers facing Milford
-Lane. Hence a private gate leads out into the Lane, where are the steps
-to Essex Street, remains of the old Water Gate of Essex House. The
-left-hand side of the green parallelogram of garden is formed by those
-ugly Plowden Buildings, for which the only hope is that they may soon be
-buried in the decent obscurity of Virginia Creeper, which can cover a
-multitude of architectural sins, and the still uglier Temple Gardens,
-and the Gateway, for which there is no hope at all.
-
-In Dugdale’s time the Middle Temple Library, owing to the fact that it
-always stood open, had been completely despoiled of books. The present
-
-[Illustration: MIDDLE TEMPLE LIBRARY
-
-ON the left are the buttresses of Middle Temple Hall.]
-
-building, in the Gothic style by H. R. Abraham, is ugly in itself, its
-proportions, especially when viewed from the Embankment, being painfully
-bad. Its height is far too great for its length and breadth, and this is
-due to the fact that two stories of offices and chambers are beneath the
-Library Room, which is approached by a charming outside staircase. The
-Library itself, which is 86 feet long, is a beautiful room with a fine
-open hammer-beam roof. It was opened on October 31, 1861, by King Edward
-VII., then Prince of Wales, who was called to the Bar and admitted as a
-Bencher of the Middle Temple on the same day.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER V
-
-THE INNER TEMPLE
-
-
-Mr. Loftie very justly observes of the Middle Temple that ‘Its Lawn
-seems wider, its trees are higher, its Hall is older, its Courts are
-quainter, than those of the other member of this inseparable pair.’ The
-Middle Temple has, indeed, been unkindly compared to a beautiful woman
-with a plain husband. This comparison, however, is far from just. For
-though its beauty is perhaps less obvious and has been much impaired by
-the ravages of modern builders, yet the Inner Temple remains a _locus
-classicus_ for the fine beauty of the Jacobean and Queen Anne styles,
-and across its green lawn the view of the Embankment, the River, and
-Surrey Hills--too often, alas! shrouded in smoke--is extremely
-delightful. Moreover, the heart of the Inner Temple presents the
-engaging completeness of a Collegiate Building. The Church and Master’s
-House on the North; the Cloisters on the West; the Buttery,
-Refectories, Hall, and Library on the South; the Master’s Garden, the
-Graveyard and Garden of the Inn on the East, form just such a Court or
-Quadrangle as delights the eye at Oxford or Cambridge.
-
-I have spoken of the Inner Temple Gateway. In King’s Bench Walk--once
-known as Benchers’ Walk--the Inner Temple can boast a row of typical
-Jacobean mansions, with handsome doorways,[41] which look upon a broad
-and classic avenue of trees. Nor can an Inn, which records the names of
-Sir Edward Coke and of John Selden amongst its members, and which was
-the home of Dr. Johnson and Charles Lamb, be reckoned inferior to any in
-the fame and interest of its _alumni_.
-
-Dr. Johnson moved from Staple Inn to Gray’s Inn, and from Gray’s Inn to
-No. 1, Inner Temple Lane (1760). Here, in a spot so favourable for
-retirement and meditation, as Boswell calls it, in a house whose site is
-indicated by the ugly block of Johnson’s Buildings (1851), were those
-rooms which have been so vividly described by the great man’s admirers.
-Here, in two garrets over his chambers, his library was stored, ‘good
-books, but very dusty and in great confusion.’ Here was housed an
-apparatus for the chemical experiments in which he delighted, whilst the
-floor was strewn with his manuscripts for Boswell to scan ‘with a degree
-of veneration, supposing they might perhaps contain portions of the
-“Rambler” or of “Rasselas.”’ It was in his chambers here on the first
-floor, furnished like an old counting-house, that the uncouth genius
-received Madame de Boufflers--received her, no doubt, clad, as usual, in
-a rusty brown suit, discoloured with snuff, an old black wig too small
-for his head, his shirt collar and sleeves unbuttoned, his black worsted
-stockings slipping down to his feet, which were thrust into a pair of
-unbuckled shoes. And then, when he began to talk, ‘with all the
-correctness of a second edition,’ all thought of his slovenly appearance
-and his uncouth gestures vanished; the knowledge and the racy wit of the
-man triumphed. We see the lady, fascinated by the great man’s
-conversation, bowed out of those dirty old rooms, whilst the ponderous
-scholar rolls back to his books. Then her escort hears ‘all at once a
-noise like thunder.’ It has occurred to Johnson that he ought to have
-done the honours of his literary residence to a foreign lady of
-quality.
-
-Eager to show himself a man of gallantry, he hurries down the stairs in
-violent agitation. ‘He overtook us,’ says Beauclerc, ‘before we reached
-the Temple Gate, and, brushing in between me and Madame de Boufflers,
-seized her hand and conducted her to the coach.’ To the bottom of Inner
-Temple Lane came the devoted Boswell, and took chambers in Farrar’s
-Buildings--now rebuilt (1876)--in order to be near to the object of his
-biographical enthusiasm. Another name famous in Literature the Inner
-Temple can boast. Francis Beaumont, the dramatist, was a Member of this
-Inn, and in 1612 he wrote the Masques performed by this Inn and Gray’s
-Inn before King James at Whitehall, in honour of the marriage of
-Princess Elizabeth and the Count Palatine of the Rhine. This Masque he
-dedicated to Sir Francis Bacon, who represented Gray’s Inn in its
-preparation.
-
-The grey walls of Paper Buildings; the plain yellow brick of Crown
-Office Row; the stock-brick of Mitre Court, the Goldsmith Buildings that
-have supplanted the dingy attic of No. 4, Inner Temple Lane, which
-looked through the trees upon the (now vanished) pump in Hare Court, are
-none of them buildings which in themselves can stir any emotion but
-repulsion, but they have a lasting charm and interest, for they are the
-sites of the homes of Elia; they are haunted by the ‘old familiar faces’
-of Charles Lamb and his friends.
-
-Charles Lamb first saw the light in No. 2, Crown Office Row, ‘right
-opposite the stately stream which washes the garden-foot,’ and there
-passed the first seven years of his life. ‘Its church, its halls, its
-gardens, its fountain, its river, I had almost said, for in those young
-years what was this king of rivers to me but a stream that watered our
-pleasant places?--these are of my earliest recollections.’
-
-The name of these buildings was derived naturally enough, because, at
-least from the days of Henry VII., the Clerk of the Crown occupied the
-Crown Office in this Inn until its removal to the Courts of Justice in
-1882. The eastern yellow brick half of the row, Nos. 1, 2, and 3, was
-built in 1737, the western half, Nos. 4, 5, and 6, of stone in the
-Italian style, in 1864, by Sydney Smirke. The Row no longer extends to
-No. 10, where Thackeray had chambers, sharing them possibly with Tom
-Taylor, before he migrated to No. 2, Brick Court.
-
-Of his old Chambers here Taylor wrote with affectionate regret when he
-heard of the ‘bringing low of those old chambers, dear old friend, at
-Ten, Crown Office Row.’
-
- ‘They were fusty, they were musty, they were grimy, dull, and dim,
- The paint scaled off the panelling, the stairs were all untrim;
- The flooring creaked, the windows gaped, the doorposts stood awry,
- The wind whipt round the corner with a wild and wailing cry.
- In a dingier set of chambers no man need wish to stow,
- Than those, old friend, wherein we denned at Ten, Crown Office Row.’
-
-The present Mitre Court Buildings date from 1830. At No. 16, in the old
-block, Charles Lamb once lived (1800), preferring ‘the attic story for
-the air.’ ‘Bring your glass,’ he writes to a friend, ‘and I will show
-you the Surrey Hills. My bed faces the river, so as by perking upon my
-haunches and supporting my carcass upon my elbows, without much wrying
-my neck, I can see the white sails glide by the bottom of King’s Bench
-Walk, as I lie in my bed.’ In Fuller’s Rents, now replaced by Nos. 1 and
-2, Mitre Court Buildings, the Earl of Leicester, Elizabeth’s favourite,
-and Sir Edward Coke, the great Chief Justice, once had chambers (1588
-_ff._).[42]
-
-Coke was a Bencher before he became Chief Justice and wrote upon
-Lyttleton. Sir Thomas Lyttleton (author of the famous ‘Treatise on
-Tenures’) is the first name upon the list of the Benchers of the Inner
-Temple.
-
-A heavy iron gate, shut at night, marks the entry to Mitre Court and
-what was formerly Ram Alley. Between the North side of Mitre Court
-Buildings and the entrance to Serjeants’ Inn are the remains of a small
-garden, marked by a few sickly trees. Beyond, is a passage leading into
-Serjeants’ Inn, which is approached by a flight of steps, and is shut
-off from Mitre Court by a door, which at the present day is seldom, if
-ever, closed. Through this private way of his, the lines of which can
-still be traced, the compact and wiry figure of the great Lord Chief
-Justice, Coke, might often have been seen passing between the two
-Inns.[43]
-
-From 1809 to 1817 Charles Lamb lived at No. 4, Inner Temple Lane, a
-house that has been replaced by part of the ugly Johnson’s Buildings.
-‘It looks out,’ he says, ‘upon a gloomy churchyard-like Court, called
-Hare Court, with three trees and a pump in it. I was born near it, and
-used to drink at that pump, when I was a Rechabite of six years old.’
-
-‘That goodly pile of building strong, albeit of Paper hight,’ as Lamb
-facetiously calls it, succeeded Heyward’s Buildings, where Selden
-laboured. Paper Buildings were burnt down in 1838, thanks to the
-carelessness of Sir John Maule, the eccentric Judge, who left a candle
-burning by his bedside. Both he and Campbell, afterwards Chancellor,
-lost everything in the flames.
-
-In Paper Buildings George Canning, the Statesman, and Samuel Rogers, the
-poet, had chambers, and Lord Ellenborough also (No. 6). The present
-block, by Smirke, contains the chambers of another Prime Minister in Mr.
-Asquith. The Inner Temple can boast yet another Premier in George
-Grenville, who became Prime Minister (1763) in the same year as he was
-elected Bencher.
-
-The name of Edward Thurlow, the rough-tongued, overbearing Lord
-Chancellor, is unhappily connected, like that of Grenville, with the
-policy which resulted in the loss of our American Colonies.
-
-Thurlow had chambers in Fig-Tree Court, the smallest and most dismal of
-these legal warrens in the Temple. He died in 1806, and was buried in
-the Temple Church.
-
-Amongst other great lawyers who had chambers in Paper Buildings, Stephen
-Lushington, Edward Hall Alderson, and Sir Frank Lockwood must be named.
-
-Paper Buildings form the Western boundary of the ‘Great Garden,’ which,
-indeed, before the erection of buildings here, used to extend to King’s
-Bench Walk. It stretched from Whitefriars to Harcourt Buildings and
-Middle Temple Lane, and from the Hall to the river wall, and if it has
-been narrowed by Paper Buildings, it has been elongated by the
-successive embankments of the River. Always carefully cultivated and
-planted with shrubs and roses, it remains, little altered by the passing
-centuries, one of the sweetest and most grateful of things--a trim
-garden in the midst of a grimy town. This is the scene chosen for that
-great and growing Flower Show, which is one of the most popular and
-pleasing of the social functions of the London season. The great
-wrought-iron gate opposite Crown Office Row is a magnificent specimen of
-eighteenth-century craftsmanship. It will be noticed that it bears, in
-addition to the winged Horse, the arms of
-
-[Illustration: HALL AND LIBRARY, INNER TEMPLE
-
-CROWN OFFICE ROW is on the left, Paper Buildings on the right. The
-Gardens run right down to the Thames Embankment, and are the scene of
-the Temple Flower Show.]
-
-Gray’s Inn--a compliment to the ancient ally of this Inn, which was
-returned upon the gateway of Gray’s Inn Gardens, and over the arch of
-the Gatehouse leading to Gray’s Inn Road. It was upon the neighbouring
-terrace that the Old Benchers, of whom Lamb wrote so pleasingly, used to
-pace. Immediately within the railings is a sundial, which dates from the
-beginning of the eighteenth century. Of these ‘garden gods of Christian
-gardens, these primitive clocks, the horologes of the first world, there
-is a delightful profusion in the Temple. Best known of all of them,
-perhaps, is that which is borne by a kneeling black figure in a corner
-of the garden near the foot of King’s Bench Walk. It was brought here
-from Clement’s Inn. The oft-quoted epigram, which was one day found
-attached to this Blackamoor, is feeble enough:
-
- ‘In vain, poor sable son of woe,
- Thou seek’st the tender tear;
- From thee in vain with pangs they flow,
- For mercy dwells not here.
- From cannibals thou fled’st in vain;
- Lawyers less quarter give--
- The first won’t eat you till you’re slain,
- The last will do’t alive.’
-
-Occasionally as I pass these many sundials, shrouded in the yellow haze
-of London fog, or scarce visible through the murk upon the dark walls
-of narrow Courts, I find myself repeating Edward Fitzgerald’s mot, when,
-after a wet week spent with James Spedding at Mirehouse, he gazed
-reflectively upon the sundial in the garden there, and observed: ‘It
-_must_ have an easy time of it.’
-
-Fires, frequent and disastrous, have destroyed nearly all the old
-buildings in the Inner Temple. Only the Church and a fragment of the
-Hall survive from medieval days. The Great Fire (1666), which left the
-Middle Temple almost unscathed, wrought devastation in the Inner. The
-Inn was then rebuilt with great rapidity, the erection of Chambers being
-left to the enterprise of Members, as before, whilst the Society as a
-whole devoted itself to the construction of the Library and Moot-Chamber
-beneath. In the fire of 1678 the old Library was blown up with gunpowder
-in order to save the Hall.
-
-The present Inner Temple Hall is a crude, pseudo-Gothic structure, which
-was designed by Sydney Smirke, and was opened by the Princess Louise in
-1870. It supplanted the restored and tinkered remains of the old Hall.
-For the ancient Refectory of the Knights Templars stood in the time of
-Henry VII. on the same site as this Hall, and does, indeed, form the
-nucleus of it.[44] The Clock Tower, at the East end of the Library,
-which forms one side of the nondescript Tanfield Court, perpetuates an
-ancient tower, which was surmounted by a turret built of chalk, rubble,
-and ragstone, like the Church, and carried a bell under a wooden cupola.
-It stood near to this spot, and was attached to the Treasurer’s house.
-The feeble architecture of the exterior is agreeably at variance with
-the fine interior of the Hall, with its open timber roof and handsome
-screen. Upon the panelled walls, like those of the Middle Temple Hall,
-are painted the coats of arms of past Treasurers and Readers, in
-perpetuation, as it were, of the old custom of the Knights Templars, who
-used to hang their shields upon the walls when they sat two by two at
-dinner in the old Hall, wherein, as the Accusers averred, the Novices of
-the Order were compelled to spit upon the Cross, to kiss an Idol with a
-black face and shining eyes, and to worship the Golden Head kept in the
-Treasury adjoining. The doors in the panelling at the East End lead now
-to nothing more thrilling than Parliament Chambers--‘a handsome set of
-rooms, the walls of which are covered with portraits and engravings of
-legal luminaries.’[45]
-
-In the minstrel gallery hang some old drums and banners, which serve to
-remind us of the martial achievements of the Lawyers, when ‘forth they
-ride a-colonelling.’ Two very richly carved doors at the north and south
-entrances to the Hall, one of which bears the date 1575, are reasonably
-supposed to be surviving fragments of the great carved screen, said by
-Dugdale to have been erected in the Hall in 1574.
-
-The four fine bronze statues of Knights Templars and Knights
-Hospitallers are by H. H. Armstead (1875). The Hall is rich in
-portraits. Beneath a large painting of Pegasus are portraits of King
-William III. and Queen Mary, of Queen Anne, George II., and Queen
-Caroline. Portraits of Sir Edward Coke and Sir Thomas Lyttleton, Sir
-Matthew Hale, Sir Randolph Carew, and Sir Simon Harcourt, among others,
-hang upon the walls.
-
-The old Hall of this, as of the other Inns, was frequently the scene of
-Revels and Merry-making.[46] Here, as elsewhere, Christmas Feasts
-formed prominent incidents in the life of the Society, and one such has
-been described by Gerard Leigh (1576), when the guests were served ‘with
-tender meats, sweet fruits and dainty delicates confectioned with other
-curious cookery ... and at every course the Trumpeters blew the
-courageous blast of deadly War, with noise of drum and fyfe; with the
-sweet harmony of Violins, Sackbutts, Recorders and Cornetts, with other
-instruments of music, as it seemed Apollo’s harp had tuned their stroke.
-Thus the Hall was served after the most antient of the Island.’ And it
-was in the old Hall of the Inner Temple that the first performance of
-the first English tragedy took place in 1561. This was ‘Gorboduc; or
-Ferrex and Porrex,’ and it was written by two distinguished members of
-this Society: Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville. A hundred years later
-Sir Heneage Finch, afterwards Lord Chancellor and Earl of Nottingham,
-‘the Oracle of Impartial Justice,’ gave in this Hall the most
-magnificent ‘Reader’s Feast’ upon record.
-
-King Charles came in his barge from Whitehall, with his Court, and was
-received at the Stairs by the Reader and the Lord Chief Justice in his
-scarlet robes. He passed into the Temple Garden through rows of Readers’
-servants, clad in scarlet cloaks and white Tabba doubtlets, and the
-Gentlemen of the Society in their gowns, whilst music and violins
-sounded a welcome to His Majesty. The Duke of York was also present upon
-this occasion, and so delighted was he with the entertainment that he,
-together with Prince Rupert, was at once admitted to the Society, and
-presently became a Bencher.
-
-Sir Heneage Finch was the most famous of a long line of distinguished
-members of that family who have been Benchers. It is characteristic of
-the Inner Temple that it has and always has had a tendency for members
-of the same families to supply the vacancies among the Benchers. The
-Pollocks, Wests, Wards, and Finches point back to a long roll of
-ancestors distinguished in the Law and the annals of the Temple. This
-tendency coincides with the aristocratic nature of the Society. For many
-centuries a candidate for Bencher was required to show at least three
-generations of ‘gentle blood,’ a regulation which affords a curious
-contrast to the more democratic nature of Oxford and Cambridge. In
-Elizabeth’s reign it was ordered that ‘none should be admitted of the
-Society, except he were of good parentage and not of ill-behaviour.’
-Such another Inner Temple family was that of the Hares, who lived for
-generations in Hare Court, the south side of which was built by Nicholas
-Hare about 1570. Hare Court, together with the rooms once occupied by
-Chief Justice Jeffreys, has been recently rebuilt. A doubtful portrait
-of that ferocious Judge by Sir Peter Lely was presented to the Inn by
-Sir Harry Poland, K.C.
-
-The exterior of the Library Building is not imposing. It contains on the
-ground and first floors the Parliament Chambers, offices, and
-lecture-rooms, and on the second floor a very fine library, admirably
-arranged in a room perfectly suited to the student.
-
-Very early indications of a Library existing with chambers under it are
-found in the records. It stood at the west end of the Hall. A later
-building, apparently, at the east end of the Hall was afterwards used as
-the Library, and was rebuilt in 1680, after having been destroyed by
-gunpowder in 1678 in order to save the Hall from the fire in that year.
-
-The north wing, upon the site of No. 2, Tanfield Court, was opened in
-1882. A case containing a collection of ‘Serjeants’ Rings’ is of some
-interest. In the anteroom to the Parliament Chambers hangs a portrait of
-William Petyt, a former Treasurer of the House and Keeper of the Records
-at the Tower, who bequeathed his exceedingly valuable collection of
-historical documents, etc., to the Inn. A fine piece of carving by
-Grinling Gibbons, as it is supposed, which is placed in this anteroom
-also, bears the inscription ‘T. Thoma Walker Arm. A.D. 1705,’ and was
-the result of a payment of £20 5s. made by Sylvester Petyt, Principal of
-Barnard’s Inn and brother of William, as executor of the latter’s
-will.[47]
-
-The narrow alley that leads from Fleet Street through Mitre Court and
-Mitre Buildings, gives little promise of the broad open expanse of
-gravel
-
-[Illustration: NO. 5, KING’S BENCH WALK, INNER TEMPLE
-
-A DOORWAY, probably by Sir Christopher Wren.]
-
-walks, sparsely dotted with plane-trees, and narrowing down to a distant
-glimpse of gardens, and of the River beyond, to which it guides our
-feet.
-
-This stretch of gravel walks is enclosed on the west by Paper Buildings
-and on the east by the buildings of the King’s Bench Walk. The lower
-half of the latter, below the gateway leading into Temple Lane, and
-facing the Gardens, dates from 1780, and is quite devoid of
-architectural merit or even any pretence to it; but the northern section
-is composed of houses of rare excellence. The fine proportions, the
-appropriate material, the handsome doorways of these houses, and the
-graceful iron lamp-brackets in front of them (Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6), all
-proclaim the influence of a great master in a good period. The doorways
-of Nos. 4 and 5 are, indeed, with every probability, attributed to Sir
-Christopher Wren, whose genius was largely employed in the re-building
-of the Temple. For the Fire of London reached the Temple two days after
-it broke out, and almost completely destroyed all the buildings east of
-the Church, King’s Bench Walk included. The houses then were quickly
-rebuilt, but, as an inscription on a tablet on No. 4 records, only to be
-burnt down again in 1677. No. 4 was rebuilt in 1678, No. 5 in 1684.
-
-In No. 1, James Scarlett, Lord Abinger, had chambers; at No. 5, William
-Murray, Lord Mansfield, of whom Colley Cibber, parodying the lines of
-Pope, wrote:
-
- ‘Persuasion tips his tongue whene’er he talks,
- And he has chambers in the King’s Bench Walks.’
-
-Another famous lawyer who had rooms here was Frederick Thesiger, Lord
-Chelmsford. The most remarkable of the cases tried by him is said to
-have formed the basis of Samuel Warren’s ‘Ten Thousand a Year,’ a novel
-whose title we most of us know now better than its contents. The author
-of this popular novel, with its legal satire of Quirk, Gammon, and Snap,
-was written at No. 12, King’s Bench Walk, in what Warren calls ‘this
-green old solitude, pleasantly recalling long past scenes of the
-bustling professional life’;--though how King’s Bench Walk can be called
-a solitude, or why a solitude should recall the bustling professional
-life, deponent sayeth not. Warren was treasurer in 1868. A painting,
-attributed to Hogarth, of King’s Bench Walk in 1734, hangs in the
-Benchers’ Committee Room, together with a painting of Fountain Court,
-also attributed to him. At No. 3 lived Goldsmith in 1765.
-
-And now, since we have drifted again from law to poetry, mention must be
-made of two other poets whose names are connected with the Inner Temple.
-About the year 1755 William Cowper left his lodging in the Middle
-Temple, and took Chambers in the Inner, remaining there till his removal
-to the Asylum ten years later. That was nearly three hundred years after
-the Father of English poetry is said to have lived here. For, if we
-could believe the life of Chaucer prefixed to the Black Letter Folio of
-1598, both he and Gower, the poet, were members of the Inner Temple.
-‘For not many years since Master Buckley did see a record in the same
-house, where Geoffrey Chaucer was fined two shillings for beating a
-Franciscan Friar in Fleet Street.’ Master Buckley was Chief Butler of
-the Inner Temple (1564), and as such performed the functions of
-Librarian. He may, therefore, quite well have seen a record to this
-effect. But there is no reason to identify this Chaucer with the poet.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VI
-
-LINCOLN’S INN AND THE DEVIL’S OWN
-
-
-It was probably the removal of the Knights Templars to the New Temple
-that gave rise to the construction of New Street. Some thoroughfare
-connecting their old property in Holborn with their new premises and the
-river was necessary to their convenience and their trade. Thus, probably
-through their instrumentality, New Street, or, as we now call it,
-Chancery Lane, came into existence, and, connecting two of the main
-arteries leading from the western suburbs into the City, and cutting
-through the very heart of the area occupied by the Inns of Court, it
-soon developed into what Leigh Hunt described as ‘the greatest legal
-thoroughfare in England.’[48] Chancery Lane, or Chancellor’s Lane, as
-the name appears in its earlier form, is said to have been called after
-a Bishop of Chichester, who was Chancellor of England at the end of the
-thirteenth century. A house and garden, near the southern end of
-Chancery Lane, was, we know, the town residence of the Bishops of
-Chichester. Here dwelt St. Richard, Bishop of Chichester (1245-1253),
-‘in true possession thereof in right of his Church of Chichester.’ The
-name of Chichester Rents perpetuated the memory of this episcopal
-habitation. Possession of this town residence of the Bishops of
-Chichester was finally acquired by the lawyers about the middle of the
-sixteenth century. A few years later (1580) they obtained the freehold
-of the open space known as Coney Garth, or Cotterell’s Garden. But it is
-not at all clear how the Society of Lincoln’s Inn came into occupation
-of these premises, or how its name had come to be attached to property
-properly belonging to the See of Chichester and St. Giles’s Hospital. In
-the absence of any other obvious explanation, we must look back for the
-origin of the Society of Lincoln’s Inn to a group of lawyers housed in
-an Inn belonging to the Earl of Lincoln, and must try to account for
-their presence on their present property by the theory of a migration
-from their first hostel. This theory fortunately presents no difficulty,
-and it is supported by various facts and indications.
-
-The parent house of Lincoln’s Inn would appear to be the Inn of the
-great Justiciar Henry de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, which stood to the
-south-east of St. Andrew’s Church. It was natural and necessary for the
-great Administrators of the Law to gather about their Courts a following
-of trained lawyers to help them to enunciate the theory, and to perform
-the business thereof. As the followers of Le Scrope, the great Justice
-of King’s Bench, settled in Scrope’s Inn, and the followers of De Grey,
-the Justiciar of Chester, in Grey’s Inn, so about the residence of the
-great Justice Henry de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, in his Manor of Holborn,
-congregated the forerunners of the Society of Lincoln’s Inn, students of
-law and practisers in the Justiciar’s Court.
-
-The hostel of the Earl of Lincoln stood at the north end of Shoe Lane,
-near Holeburn Bridge. The buildings were erected upon the ruins of the
-Monastery of the Blackfriars. The Blackfriars had settled themselves in
-Holborn, west of the north end of Chancery Lane, and gradually amassed
-property that reached down to the house of the Bishops of Chichester.
-But presently they followed the example of the Knights Templars, and
-moved nearer the River to the site of what is still called Blackfriars,
-just within the City Wall. Their Holborn property they sold a few years
-later (1286) to the Earl of Lincoln, who undertook to pay 550 marks, in
-instalments, to the Friars, ‘for all their place, buildings and
-habitation near Holeborn.’[49]
-
-Now, of Henry, Earl of Lincoln, tradition says that he developed his new
-estate by cultivating the gardens and orchards upon it, and that he made
-large sums by selling the fruit grown there. But it was, no doubt, to
-the labours of the former monkish owners, the preceding Blackfriars,
-that the gardens and orchards of the Earl of Lincoln owed their so rich
-and wonderful harvests.
-
-Lincoln, it is said, had so great a love for Lawyers that his house was
-filled with students of the Law. He had already arranged, according to
-this tradition, to transfer his house to them entirely, when, in 1311,
-he died. Such, according to Dugdale, was the story current ‘among the
-antients here.’ This tradition represents the fact that the Justiciar
-gathered about him a nucleus of men conversant with the Law, who should
-be capable of transacting the business of his Court, and who would
-naturally make it part of their business to train others to their
-trade. Equally naturally such Lawyers of Lincoln’s Inn would, in
-accordance with the almost invariable custom of medieval times, form
-themselves into a Guild, the Society of Lincoln’s Inn. It is probable,
-then, that the students ‘apt and eager,’ whom the Earl had gathered
-about him, formed themselves into the very Society which still exists,
-though it has changed its habitation. That change did not take place
-immediately after the Earl of Lincoln’s death. Through Lincoln’s
-daughter and heiress, Alesia, all his property passed to Thomas, Earl of
-Lancaster. The great quantities of wax and parchment recorded, among his
-household expenses,[50] as used in his Hostel at Shoe Lane, would seem
-to indicate that the legal business was still carried on here in 1314.
-Before entering upon the inheritance of Alesia, the Earl of Lancaster
-had already acquired the property of the Knights Templars, which
-included not only the New Temple, but also nearly the whole of the
-western side of New Street or Chancery Lane. Upon the attainder of the
-Earl of Lancaster in 1321, all his property, including Lincoln’s Inn in
-Shoe Lane, became the escheat of the King. This was subsequently
-restored to Alesia, who was known as Countess of Lincoln.
-
-The business of the Law had by this time become centred round Chancery
-Lane, and the Society of Old Lincoln’s Inn may well have deemed it
-desirable to migrate southwards. In such case it would be natural to
-find them settling upon a site which was likewise part of the property
-of the Earldom afterwards the Duchy, of Lancaster.
-
-Once in full possession of their property, the Lawyers turned with great
-energy to the business of building. They began to enclose their domain
-with lofty brick walls. The great Gateway, a Hall, a Library, and a
-Chapel were begun in the reign of Henry VII. The material chosen was the
-native red brick of London, so admirably suited to the Town, and the
-style adopted was that Tudor treatment of brick so admirably suited to
-the material. The Lawyers were guided in their choice, no doubt, by the
-possession of a Brick-field in the Coney Garth (= Searle’s Court, now
-New Square).
-
-One of the chief features of Lincoln’s Inn is the Tudor Gateway, which
-forms the main entrance into Chancery Lane. The liberality of Sir Thomas
-Lovell, one of the Benchers of the Society, and Treasurer of the
-Household of Henry VII., was chiefly responsible for its erection. This
-magnificent Gatehouse, with its flanking Towers of brick, built in 1518,
-whilst Wolsey was Chancellor, narrowly escaped destruction, in obedience
-to the imperious will of Lord Grimthorpe and his Gothic followers.
-
-Fortunately it has survived, and, with the exception of the magnificent
-Gatehouses of Lambeth Palace and St. James’s Palace, remains almost
-alone as a specimen of this period of architecture in London, when the
-Gothic was yielding place to the Palladian style.
-
-The walls of the massive tower, four stories high, are striped with
-diagonal lines of darker brick. The entrance, under an obtusely-pointed
-arch, was originally vaulted. The groining has disappeared, but the
-front still bears, in a heraldic compartment over the arch, the arms of
-Henry VIII. within the Garter, and crowned, having on the dexter side
-the purple lion of Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, and on the sinister the arms
-and quarterings of Sir Thomas Lovell.
-
-The bricks of which this Gatehouse and the outer wall of Lincoln’s Inn
-are built have an interest beyond their colour and their age. For upon
-the task of laying them ‘Rare Ben Jonson’
-
-[Illustration: OLD SQUARE, LINCOLN’S INN
-
-SHOWING the interior side of the gateway, built in 1518. Ben Jonson
-worked as a bricklayer on this gatehouse.]
-
-is said to have laboured, trowel in hand and book in pocket. Aubrey, in
-his ‘Lives,’ records that Ben Jonson worked some time with his
-father-in-law, a bricklayer, ‘and particularly on the garden wall of
-Lincoln’s Inne, next to Chancery Lane.... A bencher, walking thro’ and
-hearing him repeat some Greeke verses out of Homer, and finding him to
-have a wit extraordinary, gave him some exhibition to maintain him at
-Trinity College in Cambridge.’ This is only a tradition, though a very
-likely one; and, as Leigh Hunt says, tradition is valuable when it helps
-to make such a flower grow out of an old wall.
-
-Within the Gatehouse a small Quadrangle is formed by the Chapel, Old
-Library, and the two wings of Old Buildings. Octagonal turret-staircases
-fill the corners of these brick buildings, and in the turret at the
-South-East corner lived Thurloe, who was Secretary of State to Oliver
-Cromwell. A tablet in Chancery Lane, on the outer face of the building,
-records this fact, whilst the Treasurership of William Pitt in 1794 is
-apparently thought so little worthy of memorial that the sundial which
-once commemorated it has been allowed to disappear.[51] A portrait by
-Gainsborough of that great Statesman hangs in the Benchers’ Room.
-Tradition has it that Oliver Cromwell once had chambers in Lincoln’s
-Inn, an idea which probably sprang from the fact that Richard Cromwell
-was a student here in 1647.
-
-The brick buildings forming this Court within the Gatehouse were
-constructed during James’s reign, and it was then decided to build ‘a
-fair large chapel, with three double chambers under the same,’[52] in
-place of the one then standing, which had grown ruinous, and was no
-longer large enough for the Society. This older chapel, which did not
-stand on precisely the same site, was dedicated to St. Richard of
-Chichester. The new chapel was raised on arches, which form in
-themselves a tiny cloister, and produce a pleasing and unexpected effect
-amid these dusty purlieus of the Law.
-
-The Chapel of Lincoln’s Inn, which was designed, according to Dugdale,
-by Inigo Jones, in his Gothic manner, and in which Dr. Donne, the witty
-prelate and great poet, preached the first sermon on Ascension Day,
-1623, suffered even more than the Church of the Templars at the hands of
-the destructive Gothic Revivalists. The Chapel was needlessly enlarged.
-The buttresses were stuccoed. The beautiful proportions, which Inigo
-Jones, like all the truly great architects, knew how to impart to his
-buildings, were wantonly and inexcusably destroyed.
-
-John Donne had entered as a law student at Lincoln’s Inn, and, after
-taking Orders, he was appointed preacher to the Inn. Before this, when
-Secretary to Lord Keeper Egerton, he had been secretly married to Anne,
-Lady Egerton’s niece. Ruin stared him in the face when, on discovery of
-the marriage, he was dismissed. With a characteristic ‘conceit’ he ‘sent
-a sad letter to his wife,’ as Walton[53] says, ‘and signed it John
-Donne, Anne Done, Un-done.’
-
-Having taken Orders at the instance of King James, he was soon
-afterwards ‘importuned by the grave Benchers of Lincoln’s Inn, who were
-once the companions and friends of his youth, to accept of their
-lecture.’ Before he finally left the Inn to be Dean of St. Paul’s, he
-laid the foundation-stone of the new Chapel, and at the consecration
-ceremony, 1623, Ascension Day, he preached a sermon on the text, ‘And it
-was at Jerusalem, the feast of the dedication, and it was winter.’ So
-great was the throng of listeners that ‘two or three were endangered
-and taken up dead for the time with the extreme press.’ But Donne, great
-preacher as he was, lives, not by his sermons, but by his poems and by
-the Life with which the pen of Izaak Walton conferred immortality upon
-him.
-
-Like the Master of the Temple, the Chaplain of Lincoln’s Inn presides
-over the Chapel and attends in Hall during term-time. A Preachership was
-instituted in 1581, and the office has been filled by such men as
-Reginald Heber, Bishop of Calcutta and hymnologist, and Thomson,
-Archbishop of York. Amongst earlier Preachers may be mentioned Herring
-(1726), afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury, and Warburton (1746),
-Bishop of Gloucester, who founded the Warburton Lectures on Religion,
-which are annually delivered in the Chapel.
-
-The old coloured glass, representing Old Testament figures and the
-Twelve Apostles, made by Hall, of Fetter Lane, but probably designed by
-the Flemish artist, Bernard van Linge, is very good. It is contemporary
-with the original building, and was paid for by subscribers, who
-included in their number Noy, the Attorney-General, and Southampton and
-Pembroke, the friends of Shakespeare.
-
-In the Vaults lie Prynne, whose grave is unmarked, and the youthful
-daughter of the great Lord Brougham (1839), the only woman ever buried
-here. Lord Wellesley composed a Latin epitaph to grace her tomb. It has
-no great merit as a composition.
-
-The Old Hall stands at right angles to the Chapel. Older than the
-Gatehouse itself, it has been quite ruined by frequent alterations,
-restorations, and by hideous plastering. It was stuccoed by Bernasconi
-about the year 1800. ‘The Loover or Lanthorn,’ according to the Records
-of the Society, was ‘set up in the sixth of Edward VI.’
-
-That the same customs obtained in Lincoln’s Inn as in the other Inns,
-and were celebrated in this Hall, is indicated by an order of the
-Society during the reign of Henry VIII., that the ‘King of Cockneys on
-Childermass Day should sit and have due service; and that he and all his
-officers should use honest manner and good order, without any waste or
-destruction making, in wine, brawn, chely, or other vitails ... and that
-Jack Straw and all his adherents should be banisht and no more be used
-in this House.’
-
-It was in this Hall that the Lord Chancellor used to sit and hold his
-Court, under a picture by Hogarth of ‘S. Paul before Felix’ (1750),
-before the new Law Courts were built.
-
-Adjoining the Hall, on the South side, was the Library. The building is
-now let out in chambers. This Library was founded by John Nethersale, a
-member of the Society, who bequeathed forty marks to be spent on the
-building and on Masses for the repose of his soul (1497). Ever since, it
-has been increased, and, passing from Old Square to Stone Buildings, and
-from Stone Buildings to its present noble home, has grown in wealth and
-usefulness.
-
-Many of the volumes still retain the iron rings attached to their
-covers, by which, in old times, books in a Library were chained to the
-desks--as may be seen in the College and University Libraries at Oxford
-and Cambridge. The Library was further enriched by Sir Matthew Hale,
-Chief Justice, 1671, who bequeathed his MSS. to it.
-
-In 1787 the Library was moved to Stone Buildings, and finally to a noble
-building adjoining the New Hall, which Hardwick had just erected. The
-fair proportions of this building were unfortunately ruined by Sir
-Gilbert Scott, who, backed by Lord Grimthorpe, altered them to 130 feet
-by 40 feet. This new Library and the magnificent Hall adjoining
-
-[Illustration: THE NEW GATEWAY AND HALL OF LINCOLN’S INN
-
-THE Hall was built in 1843, and opened by Queen Victoria on the occasion
-when Prince Albert was created a Bencher.]
-
-it were erected in 1843 on the west side of that garden, where Ben
-Jonson is said to have laboured; and thus, whilst the southern half of
-the view into Lincoln’s Inn Fields was sacrificed by the Society, a
-beautiful site, amidst broad green stretches of lawns, shady trees, and
-flower-beds, was secured for their new blocks. Moreover, the Benchers
-took great and praiseworthy pains[54] to procure a good design, which
-should harmonize with the existing buildings ‘in the style of the
-sixteenth century, before the admixture of Italian architecture.’[55]
-The result of much deliberation and delay was a singularly successful
-design by Philip Hardwick, the architect who built the classical
-portions of Euston Station. Nobly proportioned, constructed of striped
-brick in the Tudor fashion, with stone dressings, so as to harmonize
-fitly with the Gatehouse opposite, and decorated with six bays, a
-projecting window at the north end, and a great south window, fine in
-detail and fine in its proportions, Lincoln’s Inn Hall is a building as
-distinguished as it is surprising, when we remember that it is a product
-of the year 1843.
-
-This Hall was opened with great ceremony by Queen Victoria, and upon
-that occasion Prince Albert was created a Bencher of the Inn. Within, as
-without, the Hall is superb; the proportions and the materials are
-excellent. The roof is elaborately carved, and ornamented with colour
-and gilt. The windows are rich in stained glass; the royal arms figure
-in the centre of the beautiful south window, the others are filled with
-old glass. In some directions, it must be confessed, the decoration is a
-trifle overdone, especially the heraldic decoration. The arms of the
-Inn, fifteen _fers de moline_ on a blue ground, with the shield of Lacy
-‘or, a lion rampant purpure,’ are repeated with bewildering frequency in
-every material.
-
-Above the daïs is the great fresco ‘School of Legislation’ (1852). G. F.
-Watts had proposed to paint the larger hall of Euston Station, gratis,
-with a series of frescoes illustrating the ‘Progress of Cosmos.’ The
-Directors of the London and North-Western Railway fought shy of so
-unbusinesslike a proposal. Nor can it be said that they were not in some
-degree wise, for London atmosphere is by no means suitable for
-fresco-work. The work of art, which the Directors rejected, took shape
-upon the north wall of the Hall of Lincoln’s Inn. For the Benchers
-accepted a similar offer from Watts, and that generous-minded artist
-adorned their Hall with the greatest of English fresco-decorations:
-‘Justice, a Hemicycle of Law-givers,’ a group of legislators from Moses
-to Edward I. The painting has suffered sadly from the acids of the
-smoke-laden compost known as London air.
-
-The Benchers’ rooms, delightful sanctums that remind one of Oxford
-Common-rooms, contain some very fine portraits of distinguished members
-of the Inn: Chief Justice Rayner, by Soest; Pitt, by Gainsborough; Lord
-Erskine, by Sir Thomas Lawrence; and later portraits by Cope, Sargent,
-Watts and others, of Lord Davey, Lord Russell of Killowen, Sir Frank
-Lockwood, Lord Macnaghten, etc. The men famous in Law, in Letters, and
-in Politics, who have been members of Lincoln’s Inn, are too numerous to
-mention. Of lawyers, besides Lord Brougham, there are Murray, Lord
-Mansfield, Lord Chancellor, the Earl of Bathurst, and Lord Campbell.
-Canning, Perceval, Disraeli, Gladstone, Daniel O’Connell, William Penn,
-and William Prynne stand out among the makers of history who have been
-members of this Inn; whilst, among men of Letters, the George Colmans
-(father and son), Horace Walpole, Charles Kingsley, and George Wither,
-are amongst the most prominent, though the latter produced his
-best-known poem in the Marshalsea Prison. And another shade, one may
-fancy, haunts the green fields of Lincoln’s Inn and the busy, muddy
-thoroughfare of Chancery Lane: it is that of Sir Thomas More, who passed
-from Oxford and New Inn to enter at Lincoln’s Inn in 1496, and was
-presently appointed Reader at Furnival’s Inn. Here, in the intervals of
-his political career, he made a very large income at the Bar.
-
-The south end of the Hall faces the garden, which is enclosed by the old
-houses of New Square. The fig-tree and the vine, like some stray
-survivals from the monkish vineyard, flourish against the soot-blackened
-bricks at the corner of these old houses, which, in pleasing calm and
-quiet dignity, surround the well-kept lawn and flower-beds. An empty
-basin in the centre of this garden marks the spot which was once adorned
-by a sun-dial and fountain, said to have been designed by Inigo Jones.
-By Inigo Jones were certainly designed the noble houses on the western
-side of the great green expanse of Lincoln’s Inn Fields--houses with
-‘Palladian walls, Venetian doors, grotesque roofs, and stucco floors.’ I
-believe some of these houses contain beautiful work in the ceilings,
-mantelpieces, etc.
-
-The whole Square, indeed, was ‘intended to have been built all in the
-same style and taste, but, unfortunately, not finished agreeable to the
-design of that great architect, because the inhabitants had not taste
-enough to be of the same mind, or to unite their sentiments for the
-public ornament and reputation’ (Herbert).
-
-Just as the Templars rented a field adjoining their buildings which they
-used for tilting, so, beyond the houses of Henry Lacy, Earl of Lincoln,
-and the Bishop of Chichester, lay a meadow, and beyond it again the
-Common, still known as Lincoln’s Inn Fields.
-
-Before 1602 there were no buildings on the north side of Lincoln’s Inn,
-and, so late as the reign of Henry VIII., so rural were the surroundings
-that rabbits abounded there, and had, indeed, to be preserved from the
-sporting proclivities of the students.
-
-In Great Turnstile and Little Turnstile we have the names of narrow
-lanes which still recall the days when Lincoln’s Inn Fields were fields
-indeed, and the Turnstiles gave access to a path which ran under the
-boundary wall of the Inn, and formed a short cut to the Strand.[56] The
-enclosing of the Fields with buildings caused much heart-burning among
-the Benchers and Students of Lincoln’s Inn, and in 1641 the Society
-presented a petition to Parliament, complaining of the great increase of
-buildings in their neighbourhood, and ‘the loss of fresh air which the
-petitioners formerly enjoyed.’ But Parliament turned a deaf ear to the
-stifling Lawyers, and the building went on unchecked. A century later
-Gay, in his ‘Trivia,’ recounted the dangers of the neighbourhood:
-
- ‘Where Lincoln’s Inn’s wide space is railed around,
- Cross not with venturous step; there oft is found
- The lurking thief; who while the daylight shone,
- Made the wall echo with his begging tone:
- That crutch which late compassion moved, shall wound
- Thy bleeding head, and fell thee to the ground.’
-
-No. 13, Lincoln’s Inn Fields is one of the most fascinating, as it is
-one of the richest, of the smaller museums that I know. It is the house
-of an architectural and artistic genius, filled with the treasures he
-collected, amidst which he loved to live and work. It is preserved for
-us as he left it. For this is the home which Sir John Soane built for
-himself, and in which he died, at the age of eighty-three, in 1837,
-bequeathing his house and treasures to be preserved as a trust for the
-Public, and more especially for Amateurs and Students in Painting,
-Sculpture, and Architecture.
-
-Sir John Soane started life as an office boy at Reading; he was the
-Architect of the Bank of England and the Dulwich Galleries; he
-surrounded himself with a school of young architects, and for their
-instruction and his own delight ransacked Europe for treasures of art,
-both antiques and of his own day. The scope of this Collection is as
-striking as its very high level of excellence. Chippendale furniture,
-French fifteenth-century glass, a noble architectural library, and many
-historical curios--these are the least of the lovely things he has given
-to us. Beautiful bronzes and Greek and Etruscan vases are balanced by
-the work of Wedgwood and Flaxman; superb illuminated manuscripts by the
-exquisite Mercury of Giovanni di Bologna, and curious ancient gems, upon
-one of which a head is cut so cunningly that whichever way you turn its
-gaze follows you. We pass from the marvellous alabaster tomb of Seti I.,
-King of Egypt about 1370 B.C., and Greek and Roman sculptured marbles,
-to a room in which first editions of ‘Paradise Lost’ and ‘Robinson
-Crusoe’ confront Tasso’s manuscript, Reynolds’ sketch-book, and the
-folios of Shakespeare’s plays which Boswell possessed. And yet we have
-taken no account of the pictures--of Sir Joshua Reynolds’ ‘Snake in the
-Grass,’ of Canaletto’s ‘Venice’ and Turner’s ‘Van Tromp’s Barge,’ of
-Watteau’s ‘Les Noces,’ of Raffael’s Cartoons--of a score of pictures and
-portraits by first-rate artists; and yet there remains that wonderful
-little room, which is lined by the masterpieces of Hogarth--‘The
-Election Scenes’ and the ‘Rake’s Progress.’ It is a wonderful place,
-this London, in which such a treasure-house can lie, unnoticed and
-almost unvisited, in the centre of an old square in the City.
-
-It is somewhat outside the scope of this book to deal with the dwellers
-in Lincoln’s Inn Fields, but mention may be made of Thomas Campbell, the
-poet, who had chambers at No. 61, whilst No. 58 was the House of
-Forster, the biographer of Dickens, which is described in ‘Bleak House’:
-‘Formerly a house of State ... in these shrunken fragments of its
-greatness lawyers lie, like maggots in nuts.’
-
-More fascinating than all is that ‘Old Curiosity Shop’ which still
-survives upon a tiny triangular plot amidst the ruin of tenements that
-have been lately razed to the ground. It proclaims itself the house
-immortalized by Dickens, and may very well have been the shop which
-suggested to him the scene of his ‘Old Curiosity Shop.’ It is an ancient
-building--an old red-tiled cottage, possibly as old as those superb
-houses of Inigo Jones, ornamented with the Rose of England and the
-Fleur-de-Lys of France, on the west side of Lincoln’s Inn Fields, which
-were put up a year before Charles laid his head upon the block in
-Whitehall.
-
-A legend, however, says that it is of later date, a relic of a dairy
-once belonging to that famous Louise Renée de Perrincourt de
-Queronaille, favourite of Charles II., who was created by him Duchess of
-Portsmouth. Portsmouth House stood opposite, and was believed to have
-been purchased by the Duchess from the proceeds of a ship and cargo
-presented to her by King Charles. But whether this was so or not, and
-whether the little shop in question is the actual begetter of Dickens’s
-vision, we cannot say with certainty. We need at least say nothing to
-discourage the belief which guides the feet of the lover of Dickens to
-Portsmouth Street, there to purchase souvenirs and conjure up the vision
-of the dark little shop, with its low ceiling and odd, unexpected
-corners, once more littered with knick-knacks and second-hand furniture
-in all stages of breakage and decay, and little Nell and her tender old
-grandfather sitting there again in the candlelight.[57]
-
-It remains to mention the Northern wing of Lincoln’s Inn, the
-rectangular Court which lines Chancery Lane on the one side and faces
-the green sward of the Garden on the other. ‘The Terrace walk,’ says
-Herbert (p. 301) truly enough, ‘forms an uncommonly fine promenade ...
-and the gardens themselves, adorned with a number of fine, stately
-trees, receive a sort of consequence from the grandeur of the adjoining
-pile.’ This is Stone Building, and is the outcome of a design to rebuild
-the whole Inn in 1780 in the Palladian style. The design was not carried
-out, and even this section of the undertaking remained incomplete for
-sixty years. Even now much of the building is of brown brick. In 1845
-Hardwick, who was then carrying out his fine Gothic design for the Hall,
-completed the façade commenced by Sir Robert Taylor. The fine Corinthian
-pilasters of freestone, the simple pediments, and the chaste greys and
-pearly whites of the plain stone, thrown into strong relief by the
-soot-blackened portions of the building where it is not exposed to the
-cleansing effect of wind and rain, render this nobly-proportioned
-
-[Illustration: STONE BUILDINGS, LINCOLN’S INN, FROM THE GARDENS
-
-COMMENCED in 1780 as part of a great scheme of rebuilding the whole Inn
-in the Palladian style. The illustration shows the so-called ‘Pitt’
-sundial.]
-
-Court delightful to the eye, and, contrasting with the warm reds of the
-other buildings in Lincoln’s Inn, convince one, if one needs convincing,
-that red-brick and Portland stone are the only materials suitable for
-London architecture.
-
-In the Eastern wing of Stone Buildings is the Drill Hall of the Inns of
-Court Volunteers, and here are preserved various memorials of the many
-Volunteer Associations which have been connected with the Inns of Court.
-
-So far back as the time of the Spanish Armada an armed force was raised
-amongst the barristers and officers of the Inns for the defence of the
-country.
-
-A copy of the original deed of this association of lawyers to resist the
-threatened invasion (1584), relating to Lincoln’s Inn, hangs in the
-Drill Hall. The original is still in possession of the Earl of
-Ellesmere, whose ancestor, Thomas Egerton, then Solicitor-General and
-afterwards Chancellor, was the first to sign it.
-
-Upon the arrest of the Five Members in 1642, five hundred warlike
-Lawyers marched down to Westminster to express their determination to
-protect their Sovereign, Charles I.
-
-Upon the outbreak of the Civil War, Charles, who from the beginning of
-his reign had always encouraged the Benchers and Students to exercise
-themselves in arms and horsemanship, granted a commission to Edward,
-Lord Lyttleton, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, to raise a regiment of
-infantry from ‘the Gentlemen of the Inns of Court and Chancery.’
-Lyttleton died of a chill contracted whilst drilling his recruits, and
-was succeeded by Chief Justice Heath. A regiment of foot ‘for the
-security of the Universitie and Cittie of Oxford,’ and a regiment of
-cavalry ‘very fine and well-horsed,’ to guard the King’s person, did not
-exhaust the fighting capacity of the Lawyers, for the majority of the
-Bar, who saw the real issue at stake in the country, sided with the
-Parliament. Bulstrode Whitelock, Lieutenant-General Jones, and
-Commissary Ireton were Gentlemen of the Robe, who rose to eminence in
-the service of the Commonwealth. John Hampden, we have seen, was a
-member of the Inner Temple; Oliver St. John was a member of Lincoln’s
-Inn, and so, too, tradition says, was Oliver Cromwell, who, when Captain
-of the Slepe Troop of the Essex Association, occupied chambers in the
-old Gatehouse here.
-
-Dugdale quotes some orders that were drawn up, in the reign of King
-James, for establishing ‘the Company of the Inns of Court and Chancery
-in their exercises of Military Discipline,’ among which was the wise
-provision that ‘if anyone be a common swearer, or quarreller, he shall
-be cashiered.’ The number was limited to 600, and ‘It is intended that
-no Gentlemen are to be enjoyned to exercise in this kind, but such as
-shall voluntarily offer themselves, to be tolerated to do it at their
-own voluntary charge.’ The officers were to be chosen by their Captain;
-every House to give their own Gentlemen their rank, and the priority of
-the Houses to be decided by chance of dice.
-
-During the rising of the Young Pretender in ’45, Chief Justice Willes
-raised a regiment ‘for the defence of the King’s person.’ The occasion
-for arms passed away quickly, and it was not till 1780 that the
-barristers and students found themselves compelled once more to meet
-force by force. For the Gordon Rioters, after sacking Lord Mansfield’s
-house in Lincoln’s Inn Fields, set fire to a distillery belonging to a
-papist, near Barnard’s Inn, and the gutters of Holborn ran with blazing
-spirit, of which the rioters drank until they died. It was to escape the
-fury of the mob that John Scott, afterwards Lord Eldon, escorted his
-lovely young wife from his house in Carey Street to the Middle Temple,
-of which he was a member. Her dress was torn, her hat lost, and her hair
-dishevelled by the violence of the rioters. ‘The scoundrels have got
-your hat, Bessie,’ cried the gallant husband, who had made a runaway
-match with her, ‘but never mind, they have left you your hair!’
-
-So long as the riots continued, the Lawyers kept armed watch in the
-Halls of their respective Societies. At the Inner Temple the mob forced
-the gate, ‘and would no doubt have plundered and burnt the place as Wat
-Tyler’s followers did four centuries before, had not a sergeant of the
-Guards, who acted as military instructor to the law-gentlemen, called
-out to the armed Templars: “Take care no gentleman fires from behind!”
-The rioters, fearing that some ambush had been prepared for them, took
-to their heels and never again molested this sanctuary of the law. In
-and around Gray’s Inn, a similar armed watch kept the ‘No Popery’ people
-at bay, and many years later Sir Samuel Romilly used to point out the
-gate where, musket in hand, he had stood sentry during some of the worst
-nights of the riots. The Lincoln’s Inn students, it seems--or, as
-another account says, those of the Temple--would have joined the
-military in repressing the riots, but were told by one of the officers
-in command that he did not wish ‘to see his own men shot!’[58]
-
-After the French Revolution, at the first rumour of invasion by the
-armies of the Republic, companies of Volunteers were recruited from
-Lincoln’s Inn and the Temple. Two corps appear to have been formed--one
-known as the Bloomsbury and Inns of Court Association, and the other the
-Legal Association. The Lincoln’s Inn Corps was commanded by Sir William
-Grant, then Master of the Rolls, who had seen service in Canada, at the
-Siege of Quebec. The Temple Companies were commanded by Lord Erskine,
-who had served in the Royal Navy before he took to the Law.
-
-Embodied in 1803, the Gentlemen of the Inns of Court took part in the
-grand Review of Volunteers in Hyde Park before the King. When the Temple
-Companies defiled before King George III., His Majesty asked Lord
-Erskine, who commanded them, who they were. ‘They are all lawyers, sir,’
-said Erskine. ‘What! what!’ exclaimed the King. ‘All lawyers? Then call
-them the Devil’s Own!’
-
-Many amusing stories are told of the Lawyer Volunteers--how Erskine used
-to read the word of command from the back of a paper like a brief, and
-how Lord Eldon and Lord Ellenborough had to be dismissed for sheer
-inability to learn the ‘goose-step.’ And it was said that when the word
-‘charge’ was given, every member of the Corps produced a note-book and
-forthwith wrote down six and eightpence! Such was the origin of the
-subsequent Volunteer Corps, which, when the Volunteer movement came
-again to the front in the crisis of 1859, was enrolled as the 23rd
-Middlesex--a title afterwards changed to the 14th Middlesex. Upon the
-standard of this Inns of Court Volunteer Corps it was proposed to
-inscribe the appropriate phrase, ‘Retained for the Defence.’ Its popular
-title, the Devil’s Own, which it still keeps, is inherited from George
-III.’s witticism--if it was indeed his--anent the Legal Association.
-
-For the South African War some forty men were selected from the Inns of
-Court for service with the specially raised City Imperial Volunteers,
-popularly known as the C.I.V. In the welter of War Office rearrangements
-the existence of the Devil’s Own has been almost miraculously preserved
-‘for the Defence.’ But, of course, its title has been altered. The 14th
-(Inns of Court) Middlesex Volunteer Rifle Corps has now become the 27th
-London Regiment.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VII
-
-GRAY’S INN
-
-
-Beyond Lincoln’s Inn, across Holborn--the road which takes its name from
-the burn that flowed through the hollow--lies Gray’s Inn, a great quiet
-domain, quadrangle upon quadrangle, with a large space of greensward
-enclosed within it.
-
-‘Nothing else in London,’ so Nathaniel Hawthorne noted, ‘is so like the
-effect of a spell as to pass under one of these archways and find
-yourself transported from the jumble, rush, tumult, uproar, as of an age
-of weekdays condensed into the present hour, into what seems an eternal
-Sabbath. It is very strange to find so much of ancient quietude right in
-the monster city’s very jaws--which yet the monster shall not eat
-up--right in its very belly indeed, which yet in all these ages it shall
-not digest and convert into the same substance as the rest of its
-bustling streets.’
-
-Yet the site of Gray’s Inn lies outside the City Boundary, and the
-Chambers, where Francis Bacon wrote, were set in a quiet spot amidst
-gardens, beyond which stretched Gray’s Inn Fields, intersected by the
-country roads of Holborn and Gray’s Inn Lane. The latter lane took the
-name of Theobald’s Road later, because it led to Theobalds in
-Hertfordshire, which was the favourite hunting seat of King James I. In
-these fields beyond Gray’s Inn Lord Berkeley’s hounds showed sport to
-the Gentlemen of the Inns of Court in the reign of Queen Mary.
-
-It is indeed difficult to realize and remember how small London was, how
-comparatively tiny even the ‘Great Wen,’ which moved Cobbett’s wrath and
-disgust, and how recent is the growth of that continuous monotony of
-streets, which have spread over the fields where our grandfathers shot
-snipe and partridges. Even at the beginning of the last century Gray’s
-Inn was a ‘private place in the suburbs,’ suitable for study, removed
-from the bustle of the City. ‘The moment the sun peeps out,’ wrote Sir
-Samuel Romilly from his Chambers in 1780, ‘I am in the country, having
-only one row of houses between me and Highgate and Hampstead.’
-
-There is a popular legend that Gray’s Inn derives its name from the
-Grey Friars, whose Church stood hard by. But this legend is not in any
-way supported by the probabilities. Gray’s Inn, in fact, was the Inn,
-_hospitium_, or dwelling-house of the Greys of Wilton. Its site was
-included in the Manor of Portpool, the name of which survives in
-Portpool Lane. The name of this Manor is derived from Port (= market or
-gate), and pool, just as in West Smithfield there was a pool called
-Horsepool.[59] The ‘market-pool’ in question may have been that in the
-northern Courtyard of Staple Inn, or somewhere else on the property of
-the De Greys.
-
-A very large portion of the Hundred of Ossulston, in which Gray’s Inn
-lies, appears to have belonged to the Bishop and Canons of St. Paul’s,
-and from the Manor of Portpool an ancient prebend of St. Paul’s
-Cathedral takes its name.
-
-The exact date when the De Greys first came into possession of the Manor
-of Portpool is not certain. But Reginald de Grey died in 1308, according
-to an Inquisition taken after his death at ‘Purtpole,’ seized of a
-messuage and certain lands there, which he held of the Dean and Chapter
-of St. Paul, London, by rent, service, and suit.
-
-This Reginald de Grey was Justiciar of Chester, whose work would often
-bring him to the Capital. It is reasonable to suppose that his following
-of clerks and lawyers would, as in the case of the Earl of Lincoln, be
-resident in his London ‘Inn,’ and thus form the nucleus of what
-afterwards developed into a School, Guild, or Society of Lawyers.
-
-The Society of Gray’s Inn probably came into corporate existence some
-time in the fourteenth century. The exact date cannot, indeed, be
-determined. As in the case of the other Inns, the known surviving
-records are scanty. And this, perhaps, is due to the same cause.
-
-Fire wrought havoc in Gray’s Inn, as elsewhere, and the earliest
-archives of this Inn, as of the Temple, were probably destroyed at the
-end of the seventeenth century. In 1687 we learn that, ‘as they were in
-the midst of their revels and masquerades, a violent fire broke out,
-which destroyed most of the paper buildings that remained; several
-records are also lost and burnt or blown up.’
-
-Such early records as do exist of the Inn as a corporate institution in
-its early days do not amount to convincing evidence, but they do point
-to the existence of Gray’s Inn as an Inn of Court in the fourteenth
-century. A list of the Readers of the Inn, with their Arms, from the
-year 1359, compiled in the reign of Henry VIII. (Harleian MSS.), we may
-take for what it is worth. It is said that William Skipwith, a
-Serjeant-at-Law in 1355, belonged to Gray’s Inn, and was the first
-Reader. Again, in 1589, Sir Christopher Yelverton, in resigning his
-membership of Gray’s Inn, as it was compulsory for him to do on being
-appointed a Serjeant-at-Law, made a farewell speech to his brother
-members, stating that ‘I doe acknowledge myself deeplie and infinitely
-indebted unto this House for the singular and exceeding favours that I
-and myne ancestors have received in it ... _for two hundred years agoe
-at least_ some of them lived here.’ This statement, if accurate, would
-prove the Inn to have been a corporate institution at least as early as
-1389. Again, we gather from the ‘Paston Letters’ that Sir William
-Byllyng, Chief Justice in 1464, told William Paston that he had been ‘a
-felaw in Gray’s Inn,’ and also mentioned one Ledam as a ‘felaw’ there.
-This is the first, and for many years the last, mention of any Fellows
-in Gray’s Inn. It may either be considered to be a confirmation of the
-view that the Lawyers’ Society was in possession in the fifteenth
-century, or merely a proof that Byllyng himself and Ledam were
-fellow-lodgers in some part of Lord Grey’s tenement. But there is, in
-fact, no indubitable mention of the Lawyers’ settlement here until the
-time of Henry VIII. However, the great-grandson of the Justiciar,
-Reginald de Wilton, leased out the _hospitium_ in Pourtepole in 1343.
-And in 1370 Lord Grey de Wilton let ‘a certain Inn in Portepole’ for 100
-shillings. Stow, on the authority of one Master Saintlow Kniveton, says
-that gentlemen and professors of the Common Law were Lord Grey’s
-tenants. At any rate, before the end of the fourteenth century (1397)
-the records show that the Lords de Grey had enfeoffed others--who
-possibly represented the Society of the Inn--with the use of their
-property. Then, in 1506, Edmund, Lord de Grey, decided to part with it
-altogether. He was perhaps persuaded to adopt this course by the fact
-that the suburban villa of the De Greys was by this time already being
-swamped by the rising tide of houses that was flowing westward from the
-City. He sold to Hugh Denys and others ‘the Manor of Portpoole,
-otherwise called Gray’s Inn, four messuages, four gardens, the site of a
-windmill, eight acres of land, ten shillings of free rent, and the
-advowson of the Chantry of Portpoole aforesaid.’
-
-The Manor presently escheated to the King, and licence was granted to
-the previous tenants to alienate to the House of Jesus of Bethlehem at
-Shene (_i.e._, Richmond) in Surrey, both the Manor of Portepoole and the
-lands in the parish of St. Andrew of Holborn, and the advowson of the
-chantry pertaining thereto, to be held to the annual value of ten marks
-(£6 13s. 4d.). Then, in 1516, occurs the first distinct mention of a
-Society of Lawyers settled in these four messuages, with their gardens,
-windmill, and chapel. For an association consisting of two Serjeants and
-four Barristers, representatives of a Society of Students of Law, took
-out a lease in that year of the Manor of Portpool from the Prior and
-Convent of Shene at a rent of £6 13s. 4d. This lease was renewed, at the
-same rent, by Henry VIII. when, at the dissolution of the monasteries,
-the Inn, together with the whole of the Priory of Shene, passed into the
-hands of the Crown. The rent was commuted into a freehold by the
-Commissioners of the Commonwealth in 1651, upon payment of a heavy fine.
-It was resumed by Charles II., the sale being declared null and void,
-and was sold to Sir Philip Matthews. Gray’s Inn thenceforth paid the old
-rent to him and his heirs, until, in 1733, the Benchers bought the
-freehold of the property from them. It is now the absolute legal
-property of the Society of Gray’s Inn.
-
-By the reign of Queen Elizabeth, Gray’s Inn had risen into great
-popularity. The Inns of Court now formed one of the leading Universities
-of England--‘the noblest nurseries of humanity and liberty in the
-Kingdom,’ Ben Jonson declared. And chief among the Colleges of Law, with
-almost double the number of students in any other Inn, stood Gray’s Inn.
-The great Lord Burghley always refers to it with the deepest affection,
-mentioning it as ‘the place where myself came forthe unto service.’
-
-Its popularity, however, can hardly have been due to the luxuriousness
-of its chambers, which, we are told, were ‘disagreeably incommodious.’
-
-Dugdale remarks that there was ‘not much of beauty or uniformity’ in the
-buildings, ‘the structure of the more ancient having been not only very
-mean, but of so slender capacity that even the Ancients of this House
-were necessitated to lodge double’--as, for instance, in Henry VIII.’s
-day, Sir Thomas Nevile wrote to say that he would accept of Mr.
-Attorney-General to be his bedfellow in his Chamber there.
-
-In 1688, it appears, the Inn was divided into three Courts--Holborn,
-Coney, and Middle or Chapel Court. Coney and Chapel Courts were
-afterwards converted into Gray’s Inn Square--a title conferred upon them
-in 1793.
-
-Holborn Court must have included South Square and Field Court, the
-latter so called from its being a passage into the Red Lion Fields,[60]
-where a Bowling-Green was laid out in the seventeenth century. When, at
-the close of that century, Dr. Barebone, the great builder, bought Red
-Lion Fields and began to build upon that site, ‘the Gentlemen of Graies
-Inn took notice of it, and thinking it an injury to them, went with a
-considerable body of 100 persons, upon which the workmen assaulted the
-gentlemen, and flung bricks at them, and the gentlemen at them again, so
-a sharp engagement ensued, but the gentlemen routed them at last.’[61]
-
-The principal entrance to Gray’s Inn was formerly from Gray’s Inn Lane.
-It was not till the end of the sixteenth century that, as Stow puts it,
-‘the Gentlemen of this House purchased a messuage and a curtillage
-situate upon the south side of this House, and thereupon erected a fayre
-gate and a gatehouse, for a more convenient and more honourable passage
-into the High Street of Holborne, whereof this house stood in much
-neede, for the former gates were rather posterns than gates.’
-
-By Gray’s Inn Gate, Jacob Tonson, Pope’s publisher, kept his shop before
-moving to Fleet Street. Soon after Holborn Gate was erected, the shop
-underneath was taken by another bookseller, one Henry Tomes by name,
-who, appropriately enough, published the first edition of Bacon’s
-‘Advancement of Learning.’
-
-The Entrance Gate from Holborn leads us from the throng and bustle of
-the streets, the din and rush of the City, and the noisome fumes of
-twopenny tubes and motor-buses, through a dull and narrow alley into
-South Square--a large, irregular quadrangle of pleasing, harmonious
-eighteenth-century houses. Opposite the entrance passage a detached
-block faces us (No. 10), containing the Common Room, admirably rebuilt
-in 1905. This is connected by an archway with the Hall, Chapel, and
-Library.
-
-The foundation of the Library has been
-
-[Illustration: A DOORWAY IN SOUTH SQUARE, GRAY’S INN
-
-IT is one of several classic entrances of this type in the Square, and
-bears the date 1738.]
-
-attributed to Francis Bacon, Lord Verulam. But references to it occur
-before 1576, the year in which he became a Member of the Inn.[62] But it
-was not till 1737 that the need was felt for the erection of a building
-specially intended to house it. Then an Order was passed for building a
-Library in Holborn Court, now known as South Square. A hundred years
-later additions were made, and in 1883 a new Library building was added,
-which is entered separately from the internal angle of South Square, and
-which fronts externally upon the then newly-made Gray’s Inn Road. The
-Library boasts a small but valuable collection of manuscripts, including
-that of Bracton’s ‘De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliæ.’
-
-The old Hall was rebuilt in 1556. It follows the usual plan of a
-sixteenth-century Hall, having a raised dais and ‘high’ table at the
-east end, and the characteristic Tudor bay window on the north side. A
-very handsome oak screen, richly carved with Renaissance ornament, and
-divided into round arched bays by Ionic columns, conceals the vestibule.
-Above the enriched cartouche frieze of the Screen is an open and carved
-balustrade, extremely handsome, though of later date, which forms a
-front to the Minstrel Gallery. A glazed lantern in the centre of the
-Hall indicates the ancient louvre. A very fine open timber roof of the
-hammer-beam type covers this charming room, and harmonizes with the
-eighteenth-century oak panelling, which lines the walls, and is
-decorated with the arms of the Treasurers. A large traceried window over
-the Minstrel Gallery, five mullioned and transomed windows on the south
-side, and four similar windows, in addition to the large bay window, on
-the north, adequately light the Hall. Many of the windows contain fine
-heraldic glass, with escutcheons of famous members of the Society.[63]
-On the walls of the Hall hang portraits of Kings Charles I. and II., and
-James II., Sir Nicholas Bacon and Francis Bacon, Viscount St. Albans,
-Baron Verulam, Lord Coke, Sir Christopher Yelverton (1602), Sir John
-Turton (1689), Lord Raymond, Chief Justice (1725), Sir James Eyre
-(1787), Sir John Hullock (1823), Stephen Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester,
-etc. But the chief treasure is the portrait of Queen Elizabeth, hung
-above the dais, which was presented to the Society by Henry Griffith,
-one of the Masters of the Bench.
-
-The exterior of the Hall was sadly ruined by the Goths, or Vandals, of
-1826. The walls and gables of dark red brick, ornamented with brick
-battlements, and relieved by labels and mullions of stone, were, like
-those of the Chapel, rendered hideous by the stucco madness of the age;
-mean modern battlements were added; slate was substituted for the warm
-red tiles of the old roof; and a wooden lantern of new and feeble design
-placed instead of the octangular wooden lantern, with a leaded cupola,
-which rose from the centre of the roof. More recently the stucco
-disfigurations have been removed, and the old red-brick buttresses and
-walls with the stone labels have been happily revealed again.
-
-There is a tradition in the Inn that the Screen which we have mentioned,
-and also some of the dining-tables now used in the Hall, were given to
-the Society by Queen Elizabeth. At dinner on Grand Day in each term ‘the
-glorious, pious, and immortal memory of good Queen Bess’ is still
-solemnly drunk in Hall. Certainly and happily this Hall, one of the most
-venerable and most beautiful of all the Halls in London, remains very
-much, as regards the interior, what it was in the days of the Virgin
-Queen.
-
-There is another legend which connects the name of good Queen Bess with
-this Hall. It is said that Her Majesty was present at the performance in
-Gray’s Inn Hall of the masque, ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream,’ under the
-stage management of Shakespeare. There is no intrinsic improbability
-about this. Though the Pension Book does not record any visit of
-Elizabeth to Gray’s Inn, the nature of the entries is such that omission
-therefrom cannot be said to prove the non-occurrence of an event.
-Francis Bacon, who was made a Bencher in 1586, and was elected Treasurer
-in 1590, was a _persona grata_ at Court, and not only took a delight in
-the preparation of pageantries, but also knew Shakespeare well. It is,
-therefore, quite likely that Queen Elizabeth visited the Inn on the
-occasion of the production of a masque by Shakespeare.[64] It is at
-least certain that in February, 1587, eight Members of Gray’s Inn,
-acting apparently with the approval of the Bench, produced a play called
-‘The Misfortunes of Arthur’ for the entertainment of Queen Elizaabeth
-at Greenwich while Her Majesty was visiting the fair. It was apparently
-in connection with this play that Bacon, being then Reader of Gray’s
-Inn, wrote to Lord Burleigh as follows: ‘There are a dozen gentlemen of
-Gray’s Inn that, out of the honour which they bear to your Lordship and
-my Lord Chamberlain, to whom at their last masque they were so much
-bounden, are ready to furnish a masque: wishing it were in their power
-to perform it according to their minds.’[65]
-
-The Benchers and Students of Gray’s Inn indulged in the Christmas
-_Saturnalia_ of Masques and Revels with as great, or even greater, zest
-than the other Societies of Lawyers. And Bacon, philosopher, statesman,
-and courtier, was by no means backward in his enjoyment of ‘Masques and
-Triumphs.’ ‘These things are but toys,’ he wrote, ‘but since Princes
-will have such things, it is better they should be graced with elegancy
-than daubed with cost.’ And accordingly he devoted some of his abundant
-energy to superintending the festivities in his own Inn, and even to
-assisting in the composition of some of the ‘Triumphs.’
-
-As early as 1525 mention is made of a masque that was acted in the Hall
-here, which was composed by John Roo, Serjeant at the Law, and ‘sore
-displeased’ Cardinal Wolsey. George Gascoigne, the poet, a Member of the
-Inn, translated plays from the Greek (Euripides’ ‘Jocasta’--the
-‘Phœnissæ’?) and Italian for the students to act. And now, in 1594,
-there were high festivities at Gray’s Inn, when an extravaganza was
-produced bearing the significant title: ‘History of the High and Mighty
-Prince Henry, Prince of Purpoole [Portpool], Archduke of Stapulia
-[Staple’s Inn] and Bernarda [Barnard’s Inn], Duke of High and Nether
-Holborn, Marquis of St. Giles and Tottenham, Great Lord of the Cantons
-of Islington, Kentish Town, Paddington, and Knightsbridge, Knight of the
-most Heroical Order of the Helmet and Sovereign of the same; who reigned
-and died A.D. 1594.’ Owing to the Hall being overcrowded on the first
-night, the students of the Inner and Middle Temples quitted the Hall in
-dudgeon, and the performance of the main piece had to be adjourned. To
-make up for the withdrawal of ‘The History of Prince Henry’ from the
-playbill, it was thought ‘good not to offer anything of account saving
-Dancing and Revelling with Gentlewomen.... To eke out the programme
-Shakespeare’s “Comedy of Errors” was then played by the players.’
-
-Thus Gray’s Inn Hall shares with the Hall of the Middle Temple the
-distinction of being the only buildings now remaining in London in
-which, so far as we know, any of the plays of Shakespeare were performed
-in his own time.[66]
-
-At Shrovetide the Prince of Purpoole and his company entertained Queen
-Elizabeth at Greenwich. After the performance Her Majesty ‘willed the
-Lord Chamberlain that the gentlemen should be invited on the next day,
-which was done, and her Majesty gave them her hand to kiss with most
-gracious words of commendation to them: particularly in respect of
-Gray’s Inn, as an House that she was much beholden unto for that it did
-always study for some Sports to present her with.’
-
-The success of this Masque was no doubt largely due to the fact that it
-was supposed to contain veiled allusions to many living persons of note,
-and that these allusions, uttered by the mimic Councillors of the
-Purpoole Court, were known to be written by the greatest of the sons of
-Gray’s Inn, Bacon himself. ‘The speeches of the six Councillors,’ says
-James Spedding, ‘carry his signature in every sentence.’[67] That they
-were written by him, and by him alone, no one who is at all familiar
-with his style, either of thought or expression, will for a moment
-doubt.
-
-The Masque prepared by Francis Beaumont, to celebrate the marriage of
-the Count Palatine with the Princess Elizabeth, was performed before the
-King and Royal Family in the Banqueting House at Whitehall (February 20,
-1613), and Francis Bacon, it is recorded, then Solicitor-General,
-‘spared no time in the setting forth, ordering, and furnishing’ of it.
-
-On Twelfth Night, 1614, the ‘Maske of Flowers’ was presented ‘by the
-Gentlemen of Graies Inn’ in the same Banqueting Hall upon the occasion
-of the marriage of the Earl of Somerset. This Masque, when published,
-was dedicated to Sir Francis Bacon, who apparently bore the whole
-expense of the performance. In 1887 ‘The Masque of Flowers’ was revived,
-being again performed with great success in Gray’s Inn Hall. Other
-masques of this and later times are mentioned by Mr. Douthwaite (p. 234
-_et seq._). Of the Masque performed by the Inns of Court before Charles
-I., which has been already referred to, ‘The Triumph of Peace,’ James
-Shirley, the dramatist, was the author. He had chambers in Gray’s Inn.
-
-The form of self-government that obtained at Gray’s Inn was very similar
-to that which the other Inns enjoyed.
-
-The Officer named Treasurer at other Inns was at Gray’s Inn known as the
-Pensioner. According to Sir Nicholas Bacon and some other Commissioners
-who drew up a report upon the Houses of Court for the information of
-Henry VIII., ‘a Pension, or, as some Houses call it, a Parliament,’ was
-summoned every quarter, or more if need be, ‘for the good ordering of
-the House, and the reformation of such things as seem meet to be
-reformed.’ These Pensions or Parliaments were ‘nothing else but a
-conference of Benchers and Utter Barristers only, and in some other
-Houses an Assembly of Benchers and such of the Utter Barristers and
-other ancient and wise men of the House as the Benchers have elected to
-them before time, and these together are named the Sage Company.’ This
-report does not mention the Ancients of Gray’s Inn. ‘The Grand Company
-of Ancients’ consisted of three classes--Barristers called by seniority
-to that degree; sons of Judges, who by right of inheritance were
-admitted Ancients; and persons of distinction who, in the words of
-Fortescue already quoted, were placed in the Inns of Court, not so much
-to make the Laws their study as to form their manners and to preserve
-them from the contagion of vice. The Constitution of the Inns, and the
-correct relation between the Benchers and Junior Members, were not
-arrived at without certain crises. The internal politics of the Houses
-were occasionally lively. Thus at the Middle Temple the right of the
-Benchers to regulate the affairs of the Inn, without reference to the
-Parliaments of barristers and students to whom, apparently, the right of
-self-government within certain limits was, by ancient custom, entrusted
-in the Vacations, was a ground of hot dispute in the seventeenth and
-eighteenth centuries. The right to hold a Parliament at any time was
-demanded. The Benchers replied that the Junior Members were only
-entitled to deliberate and represent on matters occurring in
-Vacation.[68]
-
-The Chapel of Gray’s Inn Loftie describes with equal brevity and justice
-as ‘ancient, but without interest.’
-
-In 1315 John, Lord Grey, had given lands in
-
-[Illustration: GRAYS INN SQUARE
-
-THE Hall (on the right) was rebuilt in 1556, and the chapel, covered
-with greenish stucco (in the centre), is ancient, but has suffered much
-from wholesale restorations.]
-
-the manor to the Canons of St. Bartholomew, to endow a Chaplain.
-Chaplain and Chapel alike passed to the lawyers along with the Inn, and
-it is likely enough that the present old Chapel, in spite of plaster and
-bad stained glass, represents at heart the fourteenth-century Chapel of
-the Greys.
-
-The earliest mention of it in the existing records of the Society is in
-the eleventh year of Elizabeth. It was ‘beautified and renewed’ at the
-end of the seventeenth century, and received a blanket of stucco, a
-fringe of silly battlements, and an ugly slate roof in the first
-part of the nineteenth. Some armorial bearings, chiefly of the
-seventeenth-century Bishops and Archbishops, survive in the Eastern
-Window of five lights, but much of the painted glass mentioned by
-Dugdale has disappeared or been removed to the Hall.
-
-Beyond South Square stretches a delightful quadrangle of homogeneous
-houses, which contains a large gravelled centre, bordered by a few
-sickly plane-trees. This is Gray’s Inn Square, which, as we have seen,
-took the place of Coney Court and Chapel Court. It was at No. 1, Coney
-Court, burnt down in 1678, that Bacon, ‘the greatest, wisest, meanest of
-mankind,’ is said to have lived. The site of his rooms is covered now by
-No. 1, Gray’s Inn Square, part of the row of buildings erected in 1868
-at the West end of this Court. In 1622 Bacon was granted chambers in the
-Inn consisting of ‘certayne buildings in Graies Inne [of late called
-Bacon’s Buildings] for the terme of fiftie years.’
-
-Francis Bacon was entered by his father, the Lord Keeper, on June 27,
-1576, together with his four brothers, Nicholas, Nathaniel, Edward, and
-Anthony. This was that Sir Nicholas who founded the Cursitor’s Office or
-Inn, from which Cursitor Street takes its name; Cursitor Street, with
-its bitter memories of sponging-houses and bailiffs, which have been
-improved away along with the lumbering machinery of the law that made
-such things possible. Sir Nicholas had been Treasurer of the Inn in
-1536. Francis Bacon, in the dedication quoted below, describes Gray’s
-Inn as ‘the place whence my father was called to the highest place of
-justice, and where myself have lived and had my proceedings, and
-therefore few men are so bound to their Societies by obligation both
-ancestral and personal as I am to yours.’ An Order in the following
-year, 1577, directed that all the sons of Sir Nicholas Bacon should be
-‘of the Grand Company and not be bound to any vacations.’ In the
-twenty-eighth year of Elizabeth, Francis Bacon was advanced to the
-Readers’ Table. He was elected Treasurer in 1608.[69] As
-Solicitor-General he dedicated his ‘Arguments of Law’ to ‘my lovinge
-friends and fellowes, the Readers, Ancients, Utter Barresters and
-Students of Graies Inn,’ signing himself ‘your assured loving friend and
-fellow, F. B.’
-
-It was from Gray’s Inn that the procession of Earls, Barons, Knights and
-Gentlemen started, which accompanied him to Westminster when he became
-Lord Keeper. And it was to Gray’s Inn that he returned after his
-impeachment and fall, coming ‘to lie at his old lodgings,’ and write
-many of his Treatises and Essays. ‘Those noble studies,’ says Macaulay,
-the brilliant historian, who himself occupied chambers at No. 8, South
-Square, in a building that was destroyed to make room for the extension
-of the Library--‘those noble studies, for which he had found leisure in
-the midst of professional drudgery and of courtly intrigues, gave to
-this last sad stage of his life a dignity beyond what power or titles
-could bestow. Impeached, convicted, sentenced, driven with ignominy
-from the presence of his Sovereign, shut out from the deliberations of
-his fellow-nobles, loaded with debt, branded with dishonour, sinking
-under the weight of years, sorrows and diseases, Bacon was Bacon still.’
-He commenced a Digest of the Laws of England, a History of England under
-the Tudors, a body of Natural History, a Philosophical Romance. ‘He made
-extensive and valuable additions to his Essays. He published the
-inestimable treatise, “De Augmentis Scientiarum.” The very trifles with
-which he amused himself in hours of pain and languor bore the marks of
-his mind. The best collection of jests in the world is that which he
-dictated from memory, without referring to any book, on a day on which
-illness had rendered him incapable of serious study.’ It is the brain
-and personality of such a genius that haunts this spacious, quiet square
-of Gray’s Inn. And presently we shall see how upon the Inn itself and
-its pleasaunces this many-sided mind impressed itself to our advantage.
-
-Through an arch in the far angle of the Square we pass to a narrow,
-oblong building of the crudest early nineteenth-century type, looking
-across an ugly wall upon the noisy Gray’s Inn Road. This is the ugly
-line of Verulam Buildings (1811), which Charles Lamb justly called
-‘accursed,’ for they encroached upon the gardens, ‘cutting out delicate
-crankles, and shouldering away one or two of the stately alcoves of the
-terrace.’ A postern-gate at the far corner leads out to the junction of
-Gray’s Inn Road with Theobald’s Road, a dismal thoroughfare, which is
-bounded by a railing, through which a delightful vista of green trees
-and turf gladdens the sight of the passer-by--turf and green trees which
-form the gracious playground of the children for whom the gates are
-opened each summer evening.
-
-Another Gateway by ‘Jockey Fields,’ in Theobald’s Road, leads past
-Raymond Buildings, the same kind of ugly, unabashed, stock-brick
-barracks as Verulam Buildings, and dating from the same period. Crude
-and unpleasing as these dull blocks are to behold, they have the great
-advantage of being very pleasant to live in, for they line and look out
-upon the Gardens which the great Philosopher laid out. Raymond Buildings
-end in Field Court, which in turn adjoins South Square. One side of
-Field Court is formed by the iron railings and fine iron Gateway (1723)
-which terminate the Gardens. Square stone gate-posts carry the Griffin
-of the Inn. For the device of Gray’s Inn is a Griffin, or, in a field
-sable. Within this Gate a broad avenue of plane-trees, flanked by grassy
-lawns and terraces, leads to a green earth-work terrace at the northern
-end of the gardens. This terrace was probably constructed with the
-intention of shutting out the view of the squalid houses that had begun
-to spring up in that direction.
-
-James Spedding records that Raleigh, just before his last disastrous
-voyage to the New World, had a long conversation with Bacon in those
-Gardens. And it is said that Bacon planted here a ‘catalpa tree,’ very
-likely brought home by Raleigh, which still survives, and is certainly
-one of the oldest in England. This is the sprawling, senile tree,
-tottering to its grave with the aid of a dozen propping sticks, which
-forms a striking feature upon the left-hand side of the path, looking
-from the Gateway.
-
-Bacon’s love of gardening is breathed in every line of his delightful
-Essay upon Gardens. ‘God Almighty first planted a garden. And indeed it
-is the purest of human pleasures. It is the greatest refreshment to the
-spirits of man, without which buildings and palaces are but gross
-handyworks.’ And it appears probable that the Gardens of Gray’s Inn were
-laid out under his direction in 1597 and the following years. For in
-1597 the Society ordered ‘that the summe of £7 15s. 4d., due to Mr.
-Bacon for planting of trees in the walkes, be paid next terme.’ In the
-following year a further supply was ordered ‘of more yonge elme trees in
-the places of such as are decayed, and that a new Rayle and quicksett
-hedge bee set uppon the upper walke at the good discretion of Mr. Bacon
-and Mr. Wilbraham, soe that the charges thereof do not exceed the sum of
-seventy pounds.’ And, this limit having apparently been carefully
-observed, in 1600, £60 6s. 8d. was paid to Mr. Bacon ‘for money
-disbursed about the Garnishing of the Walkes.’
-
-There is also record of a Summer-house erected by Bacon ‘upon a small
-mount’ in the Gardens, which bore a Latin inscription to the effect that
-Francis Bacon erected it in memory of Jeremy Bettenham, formerly Rector
-of the Inn, in the year 1609. It was destroyed in the eighteenth
-century.
-
-The rooks which nest in the trees of Gray’s Inn Gardens, and which fare
-sumptuously upon the fragments of food daily offered to them by the
-residents in the Chambers of Gray’s Inn, made their first appearance
-when the elms on the Chesterfield property in May Fair were felled.
-They appear to have driven out a pair of carrion crows which had built
-here time out of mind, and whose ancestors may well have looked down
-upon the author of the ‘Novum Organum,’ as he walked in those quiet
-alleys with his friend, or mused as he rested on the seat which was so
-callously destroyed a century and a half ago.[70]
-
-The principal entrance to the Gardens was from Fullwood’s Rents, and,
-when coffee-drinking first came into vogue, Coffee-Houses sprang up
-here, and reaped a rich harvest from the crowds who made of Gray’s Inn
-Gardens a fashionable and popular promenade.
-
-For Gray’s Inn Walks became as fashionable a resort in the seventeenth
-century as Merton Gardens at Oxford in the eighteenth, and when Pepys’
-wife was ‘making some clothes,’ he took her here to observe the
-fashions. And Sir Roger de Coverley loved to pace the green terrace of
-Gray’s Inn.
-
-The figure of the great Philosopher overshadows all others at Gray’s
-Inn, but the Society can boast a long line of members distinguished in
-Politics, the Law and Literature. Sir Philip Sidney was a Member of this
-Inn; so were John Hampden and John Pym, and Thomas Cromwell became an
-Ancient in 1534.
-
-Sir William Gascoigne, Chief Justice 1400, is claimed by both Gray’s Inn
-and the Middle Temple. The former can at any rate point to Gascoigne’s
-arms in the bay-window of the Hall.
-
-George Gascoigne, the poet, William Camden, and William Dugdale, the
-great and learned antiquaries, were all members of Gray’s Inn. Among the
-poets who resided here are George Chapman, Samuel Butler, John
-Cleveland, Oliver Goldsmith, and Robert Southey, who entered the Inn in
-1797. Cobbett dwelt here for a season, and another ‘Rymer’ in the author
-of the ‘Fœdera.’ Dr. Kenealy, who defended ‘the Claimant,’ was the
-last barrister to have business Chambers here, the tide of legal
-business having flowed down Chancery Lane. Gray’s Inn can boast a Royal
-Bencher in the person of H.R.H. the Duke of Connaught, who, by a
-‘Special Pension’ in 1881, was admitted a Member, called to the Bar, and
-elected a Bencher in one day.
-
-Such, in brief outline, is the history of the Four Inns of Court, in
-which is vested the monopoly of calling to the Bar of England such
-students as have kept terms at the Inn, and have commended themselves
-to the approval of the Benchers. Starting as independent voluntary
-associations of students and practisers of the law, either in connection
-with the Court of some great Justiciar, or merely in hostels, where the
-apprentices might find board and lodging during their years of learning,
-they developed into Societies, nobly housed, which controlled their
-students after a collegiate fashion.
-
-Without charters, endowments, or title-deeds, they developed on the
-lines of self-governing Guilds, subject only to a certain ill-defined
-control by the Judges, whilst their property was vested in a
-self-elected Committee of Benchers for the time being. It is under the
-guidance of these Committees that the Inns of Court have gained and
-maintained their position through the centuries, training the successive
-generations of barristers in the high traditions of honour and ability
-characteristic of the English Bar, and imparting to their youthful
-apprentices at the law, through the social system of ‘keeping terms,’
-the unwritten rules of right conduct in the legal profession.
-
-It remains now to glance at the Inns which started level in the race
-with the Inns of Court, but whose history and development have been so
-different.
-
-[Illustration: THE GABLED HOUSES OUTSIDE STAPLE INN, HOLBORN
-
-THEY are the sole survivors of Elizabethan domestic architecture to be
-found in the streets of London. The restoration of the frontage was made
-in 1884, under the care of Mr. Alfred Waterhouse.]
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VIII
-
-INNS OF CHANCERY
-
-
-As is the case with regard to the origin of the Inns of Court, the first
-beginnings of the Inns of Chancery are buried in obscurity, from which
-they can only be retrieved by the discovery of new documents. It seems
-probable, in the absence of definite evidence, that there was at first
-no distinction between Inns of Court and Inns of Chancery, but that, all
-alike, Inns of Court and the ten lesser Inns called Inns of Chancery,
-mentioned by Fortescue, were originally mere Hostels where Students of
-the Law congregated, lived and learned. Then, in course of time, the
-natural laws of differentiation and development came into play, and
-these Inns or Hostels gradually resolved themselves into two classes.
-The four great Inns of Court developed, as we have seen, from small
-associations in small hostels into great and wealthy institutions upon
-lines of aristocratic monopoly. The other Inns, taking their names from
-the Clerks of the Chancery who chiefly studied there, passed through
-different stages of development into subjection under the Inns of Court,
-and after a period, during which they partly performed the function of
-preparatory schools for the preliminary training of young students who
-were afterwards admitted as members of the Inns of Court, crystallized
-into close corporations of Solicitors and Attorneys. Then all official
-connection between the two kinds of Inns came to an end.
-
-Thus, whilst the Inns of Court became aristocratic Schools of Law,
-reserved for lawyers of gentle birth, the Inns of Chancery were
-gradually monopolized by Writ clerks, both of the Court of Chancery and
-of the Court of Common Pleas, and by other minor officials. These
-gradually ousted the well-born Apprentices who were training on for the
-Inns of Court. On the one hand Attorneys and Solicitors were excluded
-from the Inns of Court. In 1557, for instance, they were refused
-admission to the Inner Temple, and ordered to repair to their Inns of
-Chancery. In 1574 such as remained were expelled the House. The Middle
-Temple soon followed the example of the Inner. On the other hand, in
-spite of the remonstrances of the Benchers, the Attorneys, who had
-gained an ascendancy over the Inns of Chancery, set themselves to secure
-a monopoly of them. Without definitely excluding students for the Bar,
-they received them so ungraciously that, for instance, Sir Mathew Hale
-passed straight from Magdalen College, Oxford, to Lincoln’s Inn (1629).
-Indeed, John Selden, the antiquary (1584-1654), seems to have been the
-last of the great lawyers to be trained at these schools for the larger
-Societies. Thus one step in the ladder of education, so much approved by
-Coke and Fortescue, was eliminated. The Inns of Chancery were abandoned
-to the Attorneys.[71] They then gradually fell out of fashion and
-deteriorated in discipline as in prestige. By the middle of the
-eighteenth century they had become obsolete. But if they fell early into
-decline, their decadence was long drawn out. The proceedings of the
-Court of Chancery in 1900, in regard to the sale of Clifford’s Inn,
-marked their final disappearance.
-
-Of these ten lesser Inns, mentioned by Fortescue as having, in his day,
-each one hundred students studying the first principles of the Law and
-preparing to pass into the four Inns of Court, all have been now
-dissolved, and many of them have been destroyed.
-
-In the days when Clerks of Chancery and Attorneys dwelt in these Inns,
-together with embryo Barristers who were learning the rudiments of their
-legal craft, Stow neatly describes them as Provinces, for they were
-severally subject to one of the Inns of Court. Their relationship is
-obscure. Mr. Inderwick[72] compares it to that which the smaller seaport
-towns of the Kent and Sussex coast bore to the more important Cinque
-Ports.
-
-An Inn of Court appointed Readers for its Inns of Chancery, settled the
-precedence of their Principals, admitted their members at a reduced fee,
-and entertained their Ancients at grand feasts and festivals. Each Inn
-of Chancery had its own Hall for meetings, moots, readings, and
-festivity, but none could boast of a Chapel of its own. It was only
-after having studied the necessary exercises at these ‘provincial’ Inns,
-including boltings, moots, and putting of cases, that the young students
-or apprentices were admitted as students at one of the four Inns of
-Court.
-
-Of the Inns of Chancery, Staple Inn and Barnard’s Inn were attached to
-Gray’s Inn; Clifford’s Inn, Clement’s Inn, and Lyon’s Inn to the Inner
-Temple; Furnival’s Inn and Thavie’s Inn to Lincoln’s Inn; and to the
-Middle Temple, New Inn and Strand Inn.
-
-Of these by far the most interesting and picturesque at the present time
-is Staple Inn.
-
-It was of this ‘little nook composed of two irregular quadrangles’ that
-Dickens wrote in ‘Edwin Drood’:
-
-‘It is one of those nooks, the turning into which out of the clashing
-street imparts to the relieved pedestrian the sensation of having cotton
-in his ears, and velvet soles on his boots. It is one of those nooks
-where a few smoky sparrows twitter in smoky trees, as though they called
-to one another: “Let us play at country,” and where a few feet of
-garden-mould and a few yards of gravel enable them to do that refreshing
-violence to their tiny understandings.’
-
-Nothing could be more striking or delightful than the block of quaint
-old buildings, with its overhanging stories of timber and rough-cast,
-and its gabled roof. The preservation of this delightful specimen of
-Elizabethan domestic architecture, which stands at Holborn Bars like an
-island of art in an ocean of crude ugliness, we owe to the wisdom and
-good taste of the Directors of the Prudential Assurance Company, to whom
-the site now belongs. It is a pleasure to express one’s gratitude to
-them.
-
-Staple Inn Hall, which forms the south side of the first Court within
-the old entrance archway facing Holborn, was built and embellished
-between 1580 and 1592. The frontage dates from about the same time, so
-that Sir George Buck, writing in 1615, could describe it as ‘the fayrest
-Inn of Chancery in this University.’ The Hall is now used for the
-Institute of Actuaries. It retains a delightful little louvre, with a
-bell in a cupola. Mullioned windows and a charming Gothic doorway (1753)
-open, on the far side of the Hall, upon the garden front.
-
-Beyond this old sunk garden, which is bounded by a terrace and iron
-railing, the Patent Office occupies part of what was once the property
-of the Inn. To the west the garden is overshadowed by the flamboyant
-atrocity of a gross Bank building. The houses which form these quiet
-courts were for the most part rebuilt in the eighteenth century. No. 10,
-in the second Court, is that immortalized by Dickens in ‘Edwin Drood’
-(Chapter XI.). It was rebuilt in 1747, and the initials over the doorway
-do _not_ stand for Perhaps John Thomas, or Perhaps Joe Tyler, nor for
-any other of the phrases the humourist suggests, but for plain Principal
-John Thomson, who ruled in that year.
-
-Staple, or Stapled Inn, has been so called since the beginning of the
-fourteenth century (1313). The Staple Inn, or House, was the Warehouse
-in which commodities, especially wool, chargeable with export duties,
-might be stored, weighed, and taxed. It was the business of the Company
-of Staplers, established in the reign of Edward III., ‘to see the Custom
-duly paid.’[73] The proximity of Portpool Market--or Ely Fair, as it was
-called, after the Bishops of Ely, whose large property lay on the North
-side of Holborn--doubtless added much to the importance of this Staple
-Inn.
-
-The site of this Inn may possibly have been included in the Old Temple
-property, which the Templars sold to the Bishopric of Lincoln when they
-moved South (Chapter I.). However that may be, some time in the
-fifteenth century Staple Inn ceased to have any claim to be a
-Customs-house,[74] and was given over to the Lawyers. It was not a
-surprising change, for the conduct of the King’s wool-trade and the
-settlement of the disputes that must have arisen in connection with the
-clearing of woollen merchandise for export were likely to have made ‘Le
-Stapled Halle’ long ere this a home of clerks and apprentices of the
-Law.[75] The steps by which this home of lawyers passed into the control
-of the ‘Grand Company and Fellows’ of Staple Inn, with a Principal and
-Pensioner at their Head, are not known. They must, at least, have been
-taken long before ‘the first Grant of the inheritance thereof to the
-Ancients of Gray’s Inn’ mentioned by Dugdale as being dated in the
-twentieth year of Henry VIII. The transaction referred to would seem to
-have been rather in the nature of the creation of a trust. At any rate,
-Staple Inn became an appendance of Gray’s Inn. But by the end of the
-last century it had long ceased to fulfil the functions either of a
-Customs-house or of an Inn for Law-students.
-
-Finally, in 1884, the Society of Staple sold their property, and the
-Prudential Assurance Company presently acquired it. Under their
-public-spirited and artistic care, Mr. Alfred Waterhouse made a
-practical and scholarly restoration, displacing from
-
-[Illustration: STAPLE INN HALL AND COURTYARD
-
-THE Hall was built between 1580 and 1592, and has a fine hammer-beam
-roof, and some old stained glass in its windows.]
-
-the frontage the plaster with which the eighteenth century had
-disfigured it.
-
-The most famous occupant of rooms in Staple Inn was Dr. Johnson (1759),
-who came here after he had completed his ‘Dixonary.’ It was here that he
-wrote his little romance of ‘Rasselas,’ in order to pay for his mother’s
-funeral.
-
-The Mackworth coat-of-arms over a modest doorway between 22 and 23
-Holborn used to indicate until recently the entrance to Barnard’s Inn,
-the other Inn attached to Gray’s Inn.
-
-This was the residence of Dr. John Mackworth, who was Dean of Lincoln in
-the reign of Henry VI. When leased by his successor to Lyonel Barnard,
-it took the name which it now bears. The Inn was let to students of Law
-as early as 1454, for in that year Stow records that there was a great
-affray in Fleet Street between ‘men of Court’ and the inhabitants there,
-in the course of which the Queen’s Attorney was slain. As punishment,
-the principal Governors of Clifford’s Inn, Furnival’s Inn, and Barnard’s
-Inn were sent to prison.
-
-Barnard’s Inn was governed by a Principal and twelve Ancients. The study
-of legal forms was insisted on with great strictness. Fines were imposed
-of one halfpenny for every defective word, one farthing for every
-defective syllable, and one penny for every improper word in writing the
-writs according to the form of the Chancery, in the moots of the
-House.[76]
-
-A Reader was appointed by Gray’s Inn, and great respect was paid to him.
-The Principal, accompanied by the Ancients and Gentlemen in Commons in
-their gowns, met him at the rails of the House on his coming, and
-conducted him into the Hall.
-
-This is a delightful fifteenth-century building. The original timber and
-rough-cast exterior was cased in red brick in the eighteenth century. It
-has a high-pitched roof and louvre in the centre, and, within, an open
-timber roof, and some heraldic glass in the windows (1500). It stands in
-a small courtyard, beyond which there used to be another Court, wherein
-were the Library and Kitchen, and, beyond, houses grouped about a
-railed-in garden.
-
-Portraits of Lord Chief Justice Holt, the most distinguished Principal,
-and of Lord Burghley, Bacon, Lord Keeper Coventry, and Charles II. once
-hung upon the walls. In 1854 the Society consisted of a Principal, nine
-Ancients, and five Companions. The Companions were chosen by the
-Principal and Ancients. The advantage of being a Companion was, in the
-evidence given before the Royal Commission in 1855, stated to be ‘the
-dining’; the advantage of being an Ancient ‘dinners and some little
-fees.’ Barnard’s Inn is now the property of the Mercers’ Company, who
-moved their School hither in 1894. Only the Hall now (1909) remains of
-the old buildings. Even the passage from Holborn has been altered, and
-an imposing block of offices, fronting Holborn, is in course of
-erection, behind which lie the Hall and modern School buildings.
-
-Furnival’s Inn, which Stow says belonged to Sir William Furnival and
-Thomasin, his wife, in the reign of Richard II., lay to the west of the
-Bishop of Ely’s Palace in Holborn. It was brought by the heiress of the
-Furnivals to the Earls of Shrewsbury, from whom it passed to the Society
-of Lincoln’s Inn, and was by them leased to the Principal and Fellows of
-the Inn of Chancery there inhabiting (1548).
-
-Inigo Jones erected a building on this site in 1640, which was
-afterwards demolished. It was rebuilt in 1820, and the site is now
-occupied by part of the new offices of the Prudential Assurance Company.
-Of this Inn Sir Thomas More was Reader for more than three years, and
-here Charles Dickens wrote the ‘Pickwick Papers,’ and here he gave John
-Westlock chambers in ‘Martin Chuzzlewit.’ To Charles Dickens’s rooms in
-Furnival’s Inn came an artist seeking employment, who offered two or
-three drawings to illustrate ‘Pickwick,’ which the rising young author
-did not think suitable. This artist was William Makepeace Thackeray. A
-bust of Dickens by Percy Fitzgerald is placed within the entrance of the
-modern pink pile of offices.
-
-Opposite Ely House, and adjoining Crookhorn Alley, stood Thavie’s Inn,
-which is another form, no doubt, of Davy’s Inn. It is spelt so in the
-early records, and the will of John Tavy (1348) mentions his hospice in
-St. Andrew, Holborn (see pp. 5 and 39). The spelling ‘Tavy,’ I suppose,
-indicates the Welsh origin of this Mr. Davy. A John Davy occurs as
-holding lands in Holborn fifty years later. This Inn was also closely
-connected with Lincoln’s Inn.
-
-Of the Inns of Chancery which were attached to the Inner Temple, only
-Clifford’s Inn survives, and its days are numbered. Lyon’s Inn, which is
-mentioned as an Inn of Chancery in King Henry V.’s time, lay between Old
-Wych Street and Holywell Street, and disappeared with them
-
-[Illustration: THE GREAT HALL OF THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE
-
-STREET’S noble Gothic Hall, through which the Judges pass in dignified
-procession at the opening of the Courts after the Long Vacation.]
-
-in the course of the recent Strand improvements. Clement’s Inn took its
-name probably from ‘a fountain called St. Clement’s Well,’ which Stow
-describes (1603) as ‘North from the parish Church of S. Clement’s, and
-neare unto an Inn of Chancerie called Clement’s Inne; [it] is faire
-curbed square with hard stone, kept cleane for common use, and is
-alwayes full.’
-
-The picturesque Queen Anne buildings of the Inn have disappeared, and in
-their place some more pretentious flats and offices have been erected.
-They looked out, until the beginning of 1909, upon a green open space,
-some two acres in extent, bounded by the Law Courts, Carey Street, and
-the Strand. A road runs under the Judges’ Rooms in the Law Courts from
-the Strand to a flight of steps, which lead up to Carey Street beneath
-ornamental arches. This space was intended to be covered by the Law
-Courts, according to the original design. But the estimates were cut
-down, and the block which was meant to cover this space was sacrificed.
-The inconvenience which has resulted for lawyers and litigants ever
-since has been the gain of the less litigious public. For, thanks to the
-generosity of the late Mr. W. H. Smith, the vacant place was laid out as
-a lawn and flower-garden, and has long formed a refreshing strip of
-greensward in the heart of this busy centre of London. Two-thirds of it
-have now been sacrificed, for the pressing need of more accommodation is
-at last to be met by the extension of the Law Courts, and the erection
-of four new Courts, which have been begun at the north-west end of this
-plot. The new building, designed to harmonize with Street’s somewhat
-bastard Gothic building, will be connected with it by a bridge of three
-arches spanning the walk between Carey Street and the Strand.
-
-Clifford’s Inn still survives. It can be approached either from Chancery
-Lane, through Serjeants’ Inn, from Fetter Lane, or from Fleet Street.
-Out of the roar and bustle of that busy thoroughfare a passage leads up
-past the porch of St. Dunstan’s Church. On the north side of a tiny
-Court, from which an archway leads into a larger one, stands a tiny
-Hall, with a large clock and windows full of heraldic glass, amongst
-which the chequers of the Cliffords are conspicuous. This Hall in its
-present shape, re-cased and transmogrified, dates from 1797, but a
-fourteenth-century arch at the end of it points to pristine beauty.
-
-A few separate houses are dotted irregularly about on the opposite
-side. But the chief charm of Clifford’s Inn lies in the green grass
-space and shady trees, a garden bounded by railings, and on two sides by
-old brick buildings, with deep cornices and tiled roofs, which forms so
-grateful a view from the interior of the Record Office, or from the
-Court of Serjeants’ Inn.
-
-The Inn is called after Robert de Clifford, whose widow (1344) let the
-messuage to students of the law for £10 per annum. It was acquired by
-the Society at a rental of £4 towards the end of the fifteenth century.
-The Society was composed of the Principal and Rulers, and the Juniors or
-‘Kentish Men.’ It would be of interest, if for no other reason, because
-Coke and Selden once resided here.
-
-It was in Clifford’s Inn that Sir Matthew Hale and the other
-Commissioners sat to deal with the cases which arose after the Great
-Fire of London and the questions of boundaries and rebuilding.
-
-Clifford’s Inn was always reckoned, except by its members, a dependency
-of the Inner Temple. No Inn of Court, at any rate, acquired its lease or
-freehold. Clifford’s Inn paid its own way, had its own customs, its
-great days, and peculiar rules. The most interesting of its old customs
-was a kind of grace, which used to be performed after dinner by a
-member of what was mysteriously called the Kentish Mess. The Chairman of
-this Mess, for which a special table was always provided, after bowing
-gravely to the Principal, took from a servitor four small loaves joined
-together in the shape of a cross. These he dashed upon the table before
-him three times, amid profound silence. The bread was then passed down
-to the last man in the Kentish Mess, who carried it from the Hall. A
-number of old women used to wait at the buttery to receive these crumbs
-which had fallen from the rich man’s table. The exact significance of
-the symbolism of this performance is not clear. It is probably the usual
-mixture of Pagan rites and Christian observance. Antiquaries, indeed,
-have suggested that ‘this singular custom typifies offerings to Ceres,
-who first taught mankind the use of laws, and originated those peculiar
-ornaments of civilization, their expounders, the lawyers.’[77]
-
-Of the Inns attached to the Middle Temple, the Strand, or Chester’s Inn,
-so-called ‘for the nearnesse to the Bishop of Chester’s house’ (Stow),
-stood near the Church of St. Mary le Strand, without Temple Bar. It was
-pulled down by the Protector, Duke of Somerset, ‘who in place thereof
-raised that large and beautiful house, but yet unfinished, called
-Somerset house.’
-
-Lastly, there was New Inn. In St. George’s Lane, near the Old Bailey,
-was an Inn of Chancery, whence the Society, Stow tells us, moved to ‘a
-common hostelry, called of the sign Our Lady Inne, not far from
-Clement’s Inne, and which they hold by the name of the New Inn, paying
-therefor £6 rent, for more cannot be gotten of them, and much less will
-they be put from it.’ (See p. 40.)
-
-This ‘New Inn,’ which lay west of Clement’s Inn, in Wych Street, has
-also disappeared. Here Sir Thomas More studied prior to his being
-admitted to Lincoln’s Inn.
-
-Next to Serjeants’ Inn in Chancery Lane, and adjoining the garden of
-Clifford’s Inn, stood the House of the Converted Jews, founded by Henry
-III., in place of a Jew’s house forfeited to him (1233).
-
-There were gathered a great number of converted Jews and Infidels, who
-were ‘ordayned and appointed, under an honest rule of life, sufficient
-maintenance,’ and who lived under a learned Christian appointed to
-govern them. As was the case, however, with the similar House of
-Converts founded by Henry at Oxford, when all Jews were banished from
-the Kingdom in 1290, the number of converts naturally decayed, and the
-House was accordingly annexed by Patent to William Burstall, Clerk,
-Custos Rotulorum, or Keeper of the Rolls of the Chancery, in 1377. ‘This
-first Maister of the Rolles was sworne in Westminster Hall at the Table
-of Marble Stone; since the which time, that house hath beene commonly
-called the Rolles in Chancerie Lane.’ So the invaluable Stow, who adds
-that Jewish converts continued none the less to be relieved there.
-
-Henry III. also built for his Converts ‘a fair Church,’ afterwards ‘used
-and called the Chapel for the custody of Rolls and Records of
-Chancerie.’ The fabric of Rolls Chapel, after being frequently rebuilt,
-had ceased to have any merit. It was demolished when the recent
-additions to the Record Office were made (1895), and when to the vast
-Gothic Tower, designed by Pennethorne, the section facing Chancery Lane
-was added. This building, in spite of its feeble minarets and decadent,
-nondescript ornamentation, often, by virtue of its mass and handsome
-material, looks extremely effective, especially when London sun, shining
-through London mist, dimly suffuses its pearly domes with delicate
-pinks and yellows.
-
-Upon the site of Rolls Chapel a Museum of equal size has been built,
-which the present Deputy Keeper of the Records, Sir Henry Maxwell Lyte,
-has made so interesting a feature of our National Archives. In this
-Museum of the Public Record Office, three large monuments, once in the
-Rolls Chapel, have been re-erected, two of them in their former
-positions. They are of great interest and beauty. Chief among them is
-the Tomb of Dr. Young, who was Dean of York and Master of the Rolls
-(died 1516). This beautiful terra-cotta monument is ascribed to
-Torrigiano, who made the splendid tomb in Henry VII.’s Chapel. Here,
-too, are the monuments, in alabaster, of Sir Richard Allington (died
-1561), and of Edward Bruce, Lord Kinlosse, Master of the Rolls, who died
-in 1611.
-
-Amongst other Masters who were buried in Rolls Chapel, Pennant mentions
-Sir John Strange, but without the quibbling line--
-
- ‘Here lies an honest lawyer, that is Strange.’
-
-Bishop Butler’s ‘Sermons at the Rolls’ and the fame of Bishop Atterbury
-and Bishop Burnet keep alive the memory of the office of ‘Preacher at
-the Rolls,’ an office held also by the late Dr. Brewer, whose name is
-famous in the annals of historical research. As to Bishop Burnet, the
-story runs that, in 1684, he preached here upon the text, ‘Save me from
-the lion’s mouth, for Thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns’
-(Ps. xxii. 21), and was promptly dismissed for a sermon supposed to be
-levelled at the Royal Arms.
-
-Seven panels of heraldic glass have been transferred from the old Chapel
-to the new windows of the Museum, and some fragments of a fine chancel
-arch of the thirteenth century, found in the East wall, are there
-preserved. In the Museum a series of Documents of historical interest
-are exhibited, ranging from Domesday Book to the Coronation Roll of
-Queen Victoria. One of the most interesting, perhaps, of the many
-autographs is the suggestive signature of Guy Fawkes before and after he
-had been examined by torture.[78]
-
-In view of the origin of this House of the Rolls, it is interesting to
-note that Jews began to be admitted to the Bar at the beginning of last
-century. In 1833 Mr. (afterwards Sir) Francis
-
-[Illustration: CLIFFORD’S INN
-
-SHOWING the gloomy little Hall reconstructed in 1797 (see p. 178), a
-corner of the shady garden, and the fretted lantern of St. Dunstan’s
-Church in Fleet Street.]
-
-Goldsmid was ‘called’ at Lincoln’s Inn, and Sir George Jessel in 1847.
-The latter, in 1873, succeeded Lord Romilly as Master of the Rolls, and
-Keeper of those Records which are stored upon the site of the House
-founded for the maintenance of converted Jews and Infidels.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IX
-
-THE SERJEANTS AND SERJEANTS’ INNS
-
-
-Like so much of the history of the Lawyers and their Inns, the origin of
-the Serjeants and the steps by which they obtained a monopoly of
-pleading are buried in obscurity. It is, at any rate, certain that the
-Serjeants-at-Law, or _Servientes ad legem_, early acquired the exclusive
-right of audience in the Court of Common Pleas, wherein were determined
-all matters between subject and subject, where the King was not a party.
-
-The Serjeants-at-Law had secured a monopoly of pleading; but, as
-business increased in the Courts, they found themselves unable to deal
-with it. In 1292, therefore, they were empowered, by an ordinance of
-Edward I., to select from the students and apprentices of the Common Law
-some of those best qualified to transact affairs in the King’s Courts
-(_cf._ p. 6). It is not clear who these students and apprentices were,
-but they were destined in the course of time to supersede the body of
-Counsel whom they were called in to aid.
-
-‘Apprentice’ is a term that smacks of the Guild, and though in the
-fifteenth century it came to be applied to the Serjeants themselves, it
-must originally have denoted the students who sat at the feet of some
-recognized teacher of the Law. But, in truth, we have not enough
-evidence to enable us to trace the developments of the relationship
-between the Serjeants, the Students, and the Inns. The fact that the
-Serjeants, or Doctors of Law, upon attaining that degree, entirely
-severed their connection with their Inns, and that it was the Masters,
-and not they, who formed the governing bodies of the Inns, may be
-significant of some early difference or antagonism between the original
-Serjeants-and Apprentices-at-Law.
-
-The custom of tolling a newly-elected Serjeant out of Lincoln’s Inn by
-ringing the chapel bell--‘a half-humorous, half-serious reminder that
-hence-forward he was dead to the Society’--may be considered to support
-this view.[79]
-
-The obscurity of this question is enhanced, not only by the lack of
-documentary evidence, but also by the fact that the technical terms of
-the profession had no stationary significance. _Apprenticii ad legem_
-was a fluid phrase; it came to be applied to the genuine junior
-apprentices of the law in the Inns of Chancery, to the senior students
-who instructed them, as well as to those who had completed the eight
-years’ curriculum of the University, and, having passed their
-examinations, were admitted to practise as advocates in Court, to the
-very Serjeants and Judges themselves.
-
-We have seen how the topography of the Inns of Court--and of London
-itself--is bound up with the history of the Crusades and the Order of
-Templars who sprang from them. It is supposed that the Order of
-Serjeants, these Professors of the Common Law, who acquired the
-exclusive privilege of practising in the Court of Common Pleas, imitated
-the second degree of the Old Templars, and derived their name from the
-‘free serving brethren’ of the Order of the Temple. The word Serjeant is
-said to translate the Latin _Servientes_, and the King’s
-Servants-at-Law, _Servientes domini Regis ad legem_, were, it is
-suggested, the lineal descendants of the _fratres servientes_, the
-servant brethren, of the Knights Templars. The peculiar dress of the
-‘Order of the Coif’ is advanced as an argument in support of this
-fascinating pedigree. The Serjeants-at-Law marked their rank, it is
-suggested, by wearing red caps, under which, as in the East, a linen
-cap, or coif, was worn. Did the Templars bring this habit from the East,
-and were their first ‘servants’ Mohammedan prisoners? At any rate, the
-coif proper was a kind of white hood made of lawn (later of silk), which
-completely covered the head like a wig, and whilst the later black patch
-represented the cornered cap worn over it, the true vestigial
-representative of the coif is to be found in the white border of the
-lawyer’s wig.[80] A connection may be traced between the white linen
-thrown over the head of a Serjeant on his creation and the white mantle
-in which the novice was clothed when, in the Chapel of St. Anne, he was
-initiated into the Order of the Knights Templars, and declared a free,
-equal, elected and admitted brother.
-
-In this connection it is at least noteworthy that the Serjeants had a
-cult for St. Thomas of Acre (Thomas à Becket), and that in the Chapel of
-their patron Saint, adjoining the Old Hall of the Temple, they used to
-pray before going to St. Paul’s to select their pillars. The Knights of
-St. Thomas in Palestine were placed at Acre under the Templars in the
-Holy Land, and a Chapel dedicated to St. Thomas of Acre was built for
-them. Can it be that the Serjeants trace from the subservient Order of
-the Knights of St. Thomas?
-
-There is some trace of an ecclesiastical origin, not only in their
-‘long, priest-like robes,’ which Fortescue describes, ‘with a cape,
-furred with white lamb about their shoulders, and thereupon a hood with
-two labels,’ but also in their performance of a rite, which none but
-priests might offer, in a solemn ceremony that lasted down to the
-Reformation. When feasts were held in the Temple Hall, the Serjeants, in
-the middle of the feast, went to the Chapel of St. Thomas of Acre in
-Cheapside, built by Thomas à Becket’s sister after his canonization, and
-there offered; and then to St. Paul’s, where they offered at St.
-Erkenwald’s shrine; then into the body of the Church. Here they were
-appointed to their pillars by the Steward of the feast, to which they
-then returned.
-
-The theory has, indeed, been advanced that the coif was a device for
-covering the tonsure of ecclesiastical pleaders after clerics had been
-forbidden to practise in the secular Courts. But this explanation seems
-too ingenious.
-
-The ceremony of choosing a pillar at St. Paul’s, referred to above,
-points to the ancient practice of the Lawyers taking each his station at
-one of the pillars in the Cathedral, and there waiting for clients. ‘The
-legal sage stood, it is said, with pen in hand, and dexterously noted
-down the particulars of every man’s case on his knee.’[81]
-
-It long remained the custom of the Law-Courts to adjourn at noon. Then
-the Serjeants would repair to the ‘Parvis,’ or porch, of St. Paul’s to
-meet their clients in consultation. And this practice is alluded to by
-Chaucer:
-
- ‘A serjeant of the law ware and wise,
- That often had y been at the “Parvise,”
- There was also, full rich of excellence.
- Discreet he was, and of great reverence;
- He seemed such, his words were so wise.
- Justice he was full often in assize,
- By patent and by pleine commissioun.’
- _‘Prologue,’ Canterbury Tales._
-
-Whatever the exact history of their lineage, the trained lawyers who
-were summoned to attend and advise the King in Council did, undoubtedly,
-become a recognized Order, styled _Servientes Regis ad Legem_--King’s
-Serjeants-at-Law. From their ranks the Judges were always supposed to be
-chosen. The old formula at Westminster, when a new Serjeant approached
-the Judges, was, ‘I think I see a brother.’ Down to the time of the
-abolition of the Order, a lawyer, when nominated a Judge, first had to
-get himself admitted a Serjeant, and to enter the Order of the Coif.
-This was always an expensive step.
-
-Fortescue enlarges upon the cost which attended the ceremonies, when one
-of the persons ‘pitched upon by the Lord Chief Justice with the advice
-and consent of all the Judges’ was summoned in virtue of the King’s Writ
-to take upon him the state and degree of a Serjeant-at-Law.
-
-His own bill for the gold rings he was obliged to present--_fidei
-symbolo_--on such an occasion to the Princes, Dukes, Archbishops and
-Judges who were present at the ‘sumptuous feast, like that at a
-Coronation, lasting seven days, which the new-created Serjeants were
-called upon to give,’ amounted to £50. There is record of a Serjeants’
-Feast held in the Inner Temple, 1555, which cost over £660. These feasts
-were held at first at Ely Place, Lambeth Palace, or St. John’s Priory at
-Clerkenwell. Afterwards they took place in the Hall of the Inn of which
-the new Serjeant had been a Student. The whole House contributed to the
-expense of this degree. The elaborate ceremonies which attended the
-creation of a new Serjeant-at-Law are given at length by Dugdale
-(chapter xli. _et seq._). It would be out of place to recount them here.
-
-It has been humorously, though not quite accurately, observed that the
-Bar ‘went into mourning for Queen Anne, and has remained in mourning
-ever since.’ The sombre robes now worn by the English Bar may well be
-thought to symbolize the dignity of the law and the gravity of the
-profession, as the ‘spotless ermine’ typifies the integrity and
-independence of the Judges. But, as was the case with the hoods and
-gowns of other degrees in other Universities, or the black _felze_ of a
-gondola at Venice, brilliancy and splendour of colour was the original
-note, and dulness was the result of restriction. The robes which the
-Serjeants wore varied from time to time, and with different occasions.
-
-In the seventeenth century Dugdale observes that their robes still in
-some degree resembled ‘those of the Justices of either Bench, and were
-of murrey, black furred with white, and scarlet. But the robe which they
-usually wear at their Creation only is of murrey and mouse-colour,’ with
-a suitable hood and the coif.
-
-Arrangements were made about 1635 between the Judges and Serjeants, in
-accordance with which gowns of black cloth were to be worn for
-term-time; violet cloth for Court or holidays; scarlet in procession to
-St. Paul’s, or when dining in state at the Guildhall or attending the
-Sovereign’s presence at the House of Lords, and black silk for trials at
-_Nisi Prius_. But the fashions and colours were always changing. The
-violet gown, which superseded the mustard and murrey worn in Court
-during term-time, gave occasion for Jekyll’s witty rhyme, when a dull
-Serjeant was wearying the Court with a prosy argument:
-
- ‘The Serjeants are a grateful race;
- Their dress and language show it;
- Their purple robes from Tyre we trace;
- Their arguments go to it.’
-
-It was the militant Chief Justice Willes who, ten years after the ’45,
-first endeavoured to secure the abolition of the exclusive right of the
-Serjeants to practise in the Court of Common Pleas. But their hour had
-not yet come. In 1834 a mandate was obtained from William IV. abolishing
-the privilege of the Serjeants, but this was set aside by the Privy
-Council as being defective in form. At length doom fell upon the old
-Order of the Coif, in the shape of an Act of Parliament, 1846, which
-threw open the Common Pleas to all counsel indiscriminately. The last
-Queen’s Serjeants to be appointed were Serjeants Byles, Channel, Shee,
-and Wrangham, in 1857. By the Judicature Act of 1873, which consolidated
-the three Courts of Law at Westminster (_See_ Chapter I.) into the High
-Court of Justice, the Judges were no longer required to receive the coif
-on their nomination to the bench. The knell of the Serjeants’ doom had
-now rung. Five years later their Inn in Chancery Lane and the
-Brotherhood were dissolved.
-
-When the mere pillars of St. Paul’s had ceased to be regarded as
-satisfactory ‘chambers,’ the Serjeants, like the law-apprentices, took
-possession of Inns for the purposes of practice and residence. These
-Inns remained independent bodies, and never became, like the Inns of
-Chancery, subject to the Inns of Court.
-
-Scrope’s Inn, adjoining the Palace of the Bishops of Ely, and opposite
-the Church of St. Andrew in Holborn, was the first abode of the
-Serjeants. Its site was long marked by Scrope’s Court in Holborn. It
-took its name from the Le Scropes, who rose to eminence under Edward I.
-Two brothers, Sir Henry and Sir Geoffrey, both became Chief Justice of
-King’s Bench, in 1317 and 1324 respectively. Richard Le Scrope, son of
-the former, was created Baron Scrope of Bolton, and was twice Chancellor
-of England. He died in 1403, whilst in residence at his Inn. Scrope’s
-Inn would thus naturally be a centre round which the trained professors
-of the law would congregate, as round Lincoln’s Inn and Grey’s Inn, to
-help in the transaction of the business of the Justice of King’s Bench.
-It then became an Inn for Judges and Serjeants-at-Law, and so continued
-until, in 1498, it was abandoned. For the lawyers were concentrating
-upon the southern end of Chancellor’s Lane and Fleet Street. The
-Serjeants took up their residence in Serjeants’ Inn (Fleet Street) at
-least as early as the reign of Henry VI., and probably much earlier
-(Dugdale). This Inn is connected with the Inner Temple by a passage past
-the little garden once in the possession of Sir Edward Coke, and
-afterwards known as the ‘Benchers’ Garden.’ But the principal entrance
-is from Fleet Street, through a pair of handsome iron gates, in which
-are wrought the arms of the Inn, a dove and a serpent.
-
-The Gate House forms the offices of the Norwich Union Fire and Life
-Assurance Society. The whole Inn was burnt down in the Great Fire, and
-was afterwards rebuilt (1670) by means of voluntary subscriptions on
-the part of the Serjeants. But upon the expiration of the lease then
-granted to them, the Serjeants abandoned their Inn, with its fine
-chapel, hall, and houses that surrounded the Court, and united with
-their brethren in Chancery Lane. The Inn was afterwards pulled down and
-rebuilt from the designs of Adam, the architect of the Adelphi, for
-private houses and Assurance offices. The ‘elegant building,’ as Herbert
-calls it, in the classical style, which was erected on the site of the
-old Hall, formed at first the offices of the Amicable Assurance Company,
-and is now occupied by the Church of England Sunday School Institute.
-The quiet quadrangle is surrounded by pleasing eighteenth-century
-houses, with decorated porches and fine iron-work. Some of them have
-extinguishers for the links in front of their porches. Loftie noted the
-initials “S. I.” and the date 1669 upon one survivor of the Serjeants’
-rebuilding.
-
-The Inn, which the Serjeants joined when they left Fleet Street, had
-been occupied by their brethren since the end of the fourteenth century.
-But, though leased to their representatives by the Bishops of Ely, who
-held the freehold, or their lessees, it was not called Serjeants’ Inn
-until 1484. Prior to that date it was known as Faryngdon’s Inn in
-Chancellor’s Lane. Here all the Judges, as having been Serjeants-at-Law
-before their elevation to the Bench, had chambers assigned to them.
-
-A plain, unpleasing, stuccoed, Early Victorian building now faces
-Chancery Lane, and drops as a screen of ugliness across the old brick
-buildings within. This we owe to Sir Robert Smirke, who rebuilt the Inn
-(1837-1838), with the exception of the old Hall, which was ‘approached
-by a handsome flight of stone steps and balustrade.’ So Herbert, who
-says that in his day (1804) all the buildings were modern. He describes
-the Inn as then consisting of two small Courts, the principal entrance
-from Chancery Lane fronting the Hall, and the second Court communicating
-with Clifford’s Inn by a small passage. As there is an exit from
-Clifford’s Inn to Fetter Lane, it is thus possible to pass from Chancery
-Lane to Fetter[82] Lane without going into Fleet Street. When, in 1877,
-the Brotherhood of Serjeants dissolved, they sold the Inn for some
-£60,000 to Serjeant Cox, and divided the proceeds, but gave the
-twenty-six valuable portraits of their predecessors, that had adorned
-the walls of the Hall, to the National Portrait Gallery. The tiny Hall,
-the single, narrow Court of plain stuccoed houses, and some trees and
-turf behind some railings, remain to remind us of the Serjeants’ Inn and
-the Serjeants’ Garden, where Lord Keeper Guildford would take his ease,
-and where the great roll of English Judges have had chambers. But the
-beautiful old stained glass windows of the Hall and Chapel, which bore
-the arms of the various members, together with the heraldic device of
-the Order--an ibis _proper_ on a shield _or_--were removed by the
-purchaser to his residence of Millhill, where he built a chamber, the
-facsimile of the Hall, for their reception.
-
-Such is the story of the Inns of Court, which have gone on from strength
-to strength, and of the Inns of Chancery and the Serjeants’ Inns, which
-have almost vanished, together with the Societies which made them
-famous, from off the changing face of London. It is a story which,
-though briefly told, and told by a layman who makes no claim to
-originality of material, can hardly fail to be of interest to those who
-are alive to the charm of the old things of the Capital.
-
-It brings before us, not only the vision of the great Justiciars who
-transacted the business of the King’s Courts, of the great Lawyers who
-built up the mighty fabric of English Law, and the great Judges who
-defended the rights and liberties and progress of the people, but also
-many of the greatest names in literature and architecture. The precincts
-of the Temple remind us of the Order of the Red-Cross Knights, and near
-at hand are the vacated Inns of that other Order which has been likewise
-dissolved. For we see no more, save in the light of imagination, either
-the mail-clad figures of the Templars in their white cloaks stamped with
-the red cross, or the Serjeants in their white lawn coifs and
-parti-coloured gowns, wending their way from the Temple Hall to the
-shrine of St. Thomas.
-
-The silver tongue of Harcourt is mute as the impassioned eloquence of
-Burke and Sheridan, yet these buildings seem to echo with their voices,
-with the sonorous declamation of Dr. Johnson, or the witty stammer of
-Charles Lamb. There, in Gray’s Inn, we still seem to see the figure of
-Francis Bacon, pacing the walks with Raleigh, talking of trees and
-politics and high adventure; from the Gateway of Lincoln’s Inn, and past
-the red bricks laid by Ben Jonson, when Wolsey was Cardinal, the form
-of Sir Thomas More emerges; and across the way the thin, alert figure of
-Sir Edward Coke steps briskly from his tiny garden into Old Serjeants’
-Inn.
-
-Here Dickens talks with Thackeray, and Blackstone scowls at Goldsmith;
-there, in the Middle Temple Hall, Queen Elizabeth leads the dance with
-Sir Christopher Hatton, and the rafters ring with the music of
-Shakespeare’s voice and Shakespeare’s poetry. And the buildings
-themselves are the works of a noble army of English Architects,
-admirable creations and memorials of the genius of Sir Christopher Wren,
-Inigo Jones, Adam, Hardwick, Street, and of the unknown builders of
-Norman, Gothic, and Elizabethan things. These facts once known, not all
-the dirt and fog of London air, not all the noise and distraction of
-City business and legal affairs, can ever again wholly obscure the
-charm, the romance, the historical and literary associations, which
-haunt these homes of so many great English Lawyers, Writers, and
-Administrators.
-
-
-
-
- APPENDIX
-
-
- The following is a list of the chief authorities referred to in the
- foregoing pages:
-
- ADDISON, C. G.: The Knights Templars.
- BAYLISS, T.: The Temple Church.
- BEDWELL, C. E. A.: Quarterly Review, 1908.
- BELLOT, H.: The Inner and Middle Temple.
- DOUTHWAITE: Gray’s Inn, 1886.
- DUGDALE, WILLIAM: Origines Juridicales, 1671.
- FLETCHER, J.: The Pension Book of Gray’s Inn, 1901.
- FORTESCUE, SIR JOHN: De Laudibus Legum.
- GOUGH: Sepulchral Monuments.
- HERBERT, WILLIAM: Antiquities of the Inns of Court and Chancery, 1804.
- INDERWICK, F. C., K.C.: Calendar of the Inner Temple Records.
- KELLY, J.: Short History of the English Bar.
- LEIGH, GERARD: Accedence of Armorie, 1653.
- Lincoln’s Inn, The Black Books of, 1897.
- LOFTIE, W. J.: Inns of Court and Chancery, 1895.
- MANNINGHAM, JOHN, Diary of, 1868.
- Minutes of Parliament of the Middle Temple.
- PITT-LEWIS, G.: History of the Temple, 1898.
- POLLOCK and MAITLAND: History of English Law.
- PULLING, ALEXANDER: The Order of the Coif, 1884.
- SPEDDING, JAMES: Life and Letters of Francis Bacon.
- SPILSBURY, W. H.: Lincoln’s Inn, 1850.
- STOW, JOHN: Survey of London, Ed. Kingsford, 1908.
- WHEATLEY, H. B.: Literary Landmarks of London.
- WILLIAMS, E.: Staple Inn.
-
-
-
-
-INDEX
-
-
-Abinger, Lord, 103
-
-Abram, Messrs., shop, 67
-
-Adam, architect, 197, 201
-
-Addison, Joseph, 62, 66
-
-Ainger, Canon, 59
-
-Albert, Prince, 120
-
-Alderson, Edward Hall, 94
-
-Allington, Sir Richard, 183
-
-Ancients. See Benchers
-
-Anson, Sir William, 72
-
-Apprentices at the Law, 5, 6, 9, 12, 17 _ff._, 36, 38, 39, 166, 186-188
-
-Ashburton, Lord, 81
-
-Ashmole, Elias, 81
-
-Asquith, Right Hon. H. H., 93
-
-Atterbury, Bishop, 183
-
-
-Bacon, 136
- Sir Francis, 89, 144-146, 148-152, 155-162
- Sir Nicholas, 146, 153, 156
-
-Barebone, Dr., 143
-
-Barnard’s Inn, 102, 173-175
-
-Barristers, Inner, 11 _ff._
- Outer, or Utter, 11 _ff._
- Roll, 80
-
-Bathurst, Lord, 121
-
-Beaumont, Francis, 89, 152
-
-Benchers, 11 _ff._, 61, 95, 100, 153
-
-Bernasconi, 117
-
-Bettenham, Jeremy, 161
-
-Blackfriars, 108, 109
-
-Blackstone, Sir W., 70, 165
-
-Boswell, James, 87-89
-
-Bolting, 59
-
-Bowen, Lord, 72
-
-Brewer, Dr., 184
-
-Brougham, Lord, 117, 121
-
-Burghley, Lord, 142
-
-Burke, Edmund, 45, 69
-
-Burleigh, Lord, 149
-
-Burnet, Bishop, 183, 184
-
-Butler, Bishop, 183
-
-Butler, Samuel, 57, 163
-
-Byllyng, Sir W., 139
-
-
-Camden, William, 163
-
-Campbell, Lord, 81, 93, 121
- Thomas, 126
-
-Canning, George, 93, 121
-
-Carew, Sir Randolph, 98
-
-Carey Street, 177, 178
-
-Chancery Lane (= Chancellor’s Lane = New Street), 1, 8, 106,
- 107, 122, 128, 196-199
- Old Temple in, 29
-
-Chapman, George, 163
-
-Chaucer, Geoffrey, 37, 64, 104, 105, 191
-
-Chelmsford, Lord, 103
-
-Cheshire Cheese, the, 69
-
-Chester Inn, 180
-
-Chichester, Bishop of, 106, 107
-
-Child’s Bank, 66
-
-Churches, Round, 28, 29, 47
-
-Cibber, Colley, 103
-
-City, the, boundaries of, 6, 7
-
-Clarendon, Lord Chancellor, 80
-
-Clement’s Inn, 95, 177
-
-Clergy excluded from the Courts, 4, 8
-
-Cleveland, John, 163
-
-Clifford’s Inn, 5, 167, 176, 178-180, 198
- Kentish Mess, 180
-
-Cobbett, William, 163
-
-Cockburn, Sir Alexander, 81
-
-Coif, the, 192, 195
- Order of the, 188, 189
-
-Coke, Sir Edward, 87, 92, 98, 179, 196, 201
- Lord, 146
-
-Coleridge, Lord, 72
-
-Colman, George, 121
-
-Colonies, the, and the Inns of Court, 78-80
-
-‘Comedy of Errors,’ the, 150
-
-Coney Garth, 107, 111
-
-Congreve, William, 80
-
-Connaught, H.R.H. the Duke of, 163
-
-Converts, House of the, 181 _ff._
-
-Courts, the Civil, 3, 4
-
-Coverley, Sir Roger de, 162
-
-Cowper, Lord Chancellor, 81
- William, 73, 104
-
-Cox, Serjeant, 199
-
-Cromwell, Oliver, 113, 114, 130
- Thomas, 163
-
-Crusades, 188
- influence of, 2
-
-Cursitor Street, 156
-
-
-Davey, Lord, 121
-
-Day, Thomas, 60
-
-Denys, Hugh, 140
-
-Despencer, Hugh le, 36
-
-Devereux Court, 35, 82
-
-Devil Tavern, the, 66
-
-Devil’s Own, the, 129 _ff._
-
-Dickens, Charles, 126-128, 169-171, 176
- quoted, 46, 82, 83
-
-Disraeli, Benjamin, 121
-
-Donne, Dr., 114 _ff._
-
-Drake, Sir Francis, 78
-
-
-Eldon, Lord Chancellor, 81, 131, 134
-
-Ellenborough, Lord, 93, 94, 134
-
-Ellesmere, Earl of, 129
-
-Ely, Bishops of, 197
-
-Ely Place, 171
-
-Embankment, the, 67, 74, 94
-
-Erskine, Lord, 121, 133
-
-Essex House, 35
- Water Gate, 84
- Inn, 35
- Street, 29, 35
-
-Evelyn, John, 81
-
-Eyre, Sir James, 146
-
-
-Faryngdon’s Inn, 198
-
-Feasts and Bevels. See Inns of Court
-
-Fetter Lane, 178, 198
-
-Fielding, Henry, 62, 73
-
-Finch, Sir Heneage, 99, 100
-
-Fire of London, the, 45, 47, 57, 74, 96, 103, 179
- of 1678, 59, 73, 81, 96
-
-Fitchett’s Field, 30
-
-Fitzgerald, Edward, quoted, 96
- Percy, 176
-
-Fleet Street, 1, 2, 5, 9, 29-31, 44, 65, 102, 178, 196
- No. 16, 45
- No. 17, 45
-
-Ford, John, 80
-
-Fresco by Watts, 120
-
-Furnival’s Inn, 122, 175, 176
-
-
-Gainsborough, 113
-
-Gardiner, Bishop, 146
-
-Gascoigne, George, 163
- Sir William, 163
-
-Gauden, Dr. John, 58
-
-Gibbons, Grinling, 102
-
-Gifford, Robert, M.R., 81
-
-Gladstone, W. E., 121
-
-Goldsmith, Oliver, 62, 65, 69-72, 104, 163
-
-Goldsmith’s grave, 71
-
-Goldsmith, Sir Francis, 185
-
-‘_Gorboduc_,’ 99
-
-Gordon Riots, 131, 132
-
-Grant, Sir William, 133
-
-Gray, Earl de, 108
-
-Gray’s Inn, 6, 70, 87, 89, 108, 135 _ff._, 195
- Ancients of, 153
- and Barnard’s Inn, 173-175
- and Francis Bacon, 148 _ff._
- and Queen Elizabeth, 146-152
- and Shakespeare, 148, 150
- and Staple Inn, 172
- arms of, 160
- buildings of, 142 _ff._
- Chapel, 144, 154, 155
- Field Court, 159
- Fields, 136
- Fullwood’s Rents, 162
- Gardens, 159 _ff._
- Gateways, 143, 144
- Hall, 144 _ff._
- Lane, 136, 143
- Library, 144, 145
- masques and plays at, 148 _ff._
- moots received at, 21
- origin of, 137-142
- pensions and pensioners of, 153
- Raymond Buildings, 159
- Road, 145, 158
- rookery in, 161
- South Square, 143 _ff._, 157, 159
- Square, 143, 155, 156
- surroundings of, 135, 136
- Verulam Buildings, 158, 159
- Walks, 162
-
-Grenville, George, 93
-
-Grey Friars, the, 137
-
-Greys, the, of Wilton, 137 _ff._
-
-Griffith, Henry, 147
-
-Grimthorpe, Lord, 112, 118
-
-
-Hale, Sir Matthew, 98, 118, 167, 179
-
-Hallam, Henry, 80
-
-Halls of the Inns, 11 _ff._
-
-Hampden, John, 162
-
-Harcourt, Sir Simon, 98
-
-Hardwick, Philip, 118, 119, 128
-
-Hatton, Sir C., 25
-
-Havelock, Sir Henry, 81
-
-Hawthorne, Nathaniel, 135
-
-Heath, C. J., 130
-
-Heber, Bishop, 116
-
-Herring, Archbishop, 116
-
-Hogarth, William, 76, 104, 118, 126
-
-Holborn, 8, 131, 135, 144, 195
- Bars, 6, 7, 29, 31
- Bridge, 108
-
-Hooker, bust of, 55
- Dr. John, 58
-
-Hullock, Sir John, 146
-
-
-Inner Temple. See Temple Lane, 87, 89, 92
-
-Inns of Chancery, 9, 18
- dissolution of, 167
- monopolized by attorneys, 167
- origin of, 165 _ff._
- relation of Inns of Court to, 166-168.
- See Barnard’s Inn, Clement’s Inn, Clifford’s Inn, Furnival’s Inn,
- Lyon’s Inn, New Inn, Staple Inn, Strand Inn, Thavie’s Inn
-
-Inns of Court, 61-64, 75, 106, 142
- and the Colonies, 79, 80
- a University of Law, 8-11, 16
- an aristocratic University, 16, 17
- buildings of, 73
- degrees, discipline, and customs of, 11-26
- Feastings, Revels, and Post-Revels, 13, 22-26, 77, 98, 117, 192, 193
- Guilds of Study, 9, 10, 17
- Halls, 23-26
- homes of literature, 19 _ff._
- Irish Law-students at the Inns of Court, 20
- masques and plays performed at, 24-26, 65, 77, 89, 148 _ff._, 192
- origin of, 2 _ff._
- Parliaments of, 153, 154
- position of, 163, 164
- relation of, to Inns of Chancery, 165-168
- Volunteers, 129 _ff._
-
-Ireton, Commissary, 130
-
-
-Jeffreys, Lord Chancellor, 55, 80, 101
-
-Jessel, Sir George, 185
-
-Jews, House of the Converted, 181 _ff._
-
-Johnson, Dr., 62, 65-67, 69, 87-89, 173
-
-Jones, Inigo, 45, 114, 115, 122, 127, 175
- Lieutenant-General, 130
- Sir William, 60
-
-Jonson, Ben, 66, 112, 113, 142
-
-
-Kenealy, Dr., 163
-
-Kentish Mess (Clifford’s Inn), 180
-
-King Charles I., 25, 76, 99, 129, 130, 146, 152
- Charles II., 127, 141, 146
- Edward I., 33
- Ordinance of, 4, 186
- Edward II., 34-36
- Edward VII., 85
- George II., 98
- George III., 133
- Henry II., 30
- Henry III., 33, 181
- Ordinance of, 8
- Henry VII., 111
- Henry VIII., 112
- James I., 40, 89, 100, 136
- patent of, 41
- James II., 146
- John, 33
- William III., 98
-
-King’s Bench Walk, 94
-
-Kingsley, Charles, 121
-
-Kinlosse, Lord, 183
-
-Knights Hospitallers (Order of St. John), 34-36, 39, 40, 47, 58, 98
-
-Knights Templars. See Templars, Knights
-
-
-Lamb, Charles, 29, 59, 65, 82, 87, 89-95, 159
-
-Lambeth Palace, 112
-
-Lancaster, Thomas, Earl of, 35, 39, 40, 110
-
-Law Courts, the, 1, 3, 8, 30, 118, 177, 178
-
-Leicester, Earl of, 91
-
-Leigh, Gerard, 99
-
-Lincoln, Earl of, 107 _ff._
-
-Lincoln’s Inn, 6, 20, 29, 107 _ff._, 167
- Buildings, 111 _ff._
- Chapel, 113-117
- Chaplain of, 114-116
- custom at, 187
- Fields, 122-128, 131
- No. 13 (Soane Museum), 124-126
- fresco, by Watts, 120, 121
- Gateway, 111-113, 130
- Library, 113, 118
- New Hall, 118-122
- Square, 122
- Old Buildings, 113
- Hall, 117, 118
- origin of, 107-111
- Revels at, 117
- Stone Buildings, 118, 128, 129
-
-Linge, Bernard van, 116
-
-Lockwood, Sir Frank, 94, 121
-
-London County Council, 45, 67
-
-London, growth of, 1, 136
-
-Louvres, 23, 24, 76, 117
-
-Lovell, Sir Thomas, 111, 112
-
-Lushington, Stephen, 94
-
-Lyon’s Inn, 176
-
-Lyte, Sir Henry Maxwell, 183
-
-Lyttleton, Edward, Lord, 92, 130
- Sir Thomas, 92, 98
-
-
-Macaulay, Lord, 157
-
-Mackworth, Dr. John, 173
-
-Macnaghten, Lord, 121
-
-Mandeville, Geoffrey, effigy of, 54
-
-Manningham, John, diary of, 77
-
-Mansfield, Lord, C.J., 81, 103, 121, 131
-
-Masque of Flowers, the, 152
-
-Masques and Plays, 24-26, 65, 89, 148 _ff._
-
-Matthews, Sir Philip, 141
-
-Maule, Sir John, 93
-
-Mercers’ Company, the, 175
-
-Micklethwaite, Dr., 58
-
-Middle Temple. See Temple, Middle
- Lane, 67, 74
-
-Midsummer Night’s Dream, 148
-
-Milford Lane, 84
-
-Molyneux Globes, 79
-
-Moots, 11 _ff._
-
-More, Sir Thomas, 122, 175, 181
-
-Museum, Sir John Soane, 124-126
- Record Office, 183, 184
-
-
-Nethersale, John, 118
-
-Neville, Sir Thomas, 142
-
-New Inn, 40, 181
-
-Norths, the, 81
-
-Norton, Thomas, 65, 99
-
-
-O’Connell, Daniel, 20, 121
-
-‘Old Curiosity Shop,’ the, 126-128
-
-Ossulston, Manor of, 137
-
-Overbury, Sir Thomas, 80
-
-
-Parvis, the, of St. Paul’s, 191
-
-Paston Letters, the, 139
-
-Paulet, Sir Amias, 66
-
-Pembroke, Earl of, 35, 36
- Earls of, effigies of, 53
-
-Penn, William, 121
-
-Perceval, 121
-
-Petyt, Sylvester, 102
- William, 102
-
-Pitt, William, 113, 121
-
-Plays. See Inns of Court, Masques
-
-Plowden, Edmund, 80
- Monument, 56
-
-Poland, Sir Harry, 101
-
-Pollocks, the, 81, 100
-
-Portpool, Manor of, 137, 140, 141
- Market, 171
-
-Portsmouth, Duchess of, 127
- Street, 127
-
-Post-Revels. See Inns of Court, Feasts, etc.
-
-Praed, W. M., 69
-
-Prudential Assurance Company, 169, 170, 172, 175, 176
-
-Prynne, John, 25
- William, 117, 121
-
-Pym, John, 77, 163
-
-
-Queen Anne, 98
- Caroline, 98
- Elizabeth, 25, 78, 146-152
- Mary, 98
- Victoria, 6, 119, 184
-
-Quincey, Thomas de, 80
-
-
-Raleigh, Sir Walter, 78, 160
-
-Raymond, Lord, 146
-
-Rayner, C. J., 121
-
-Readers, 12 _ff._
-
-Readerships, revived, 20
-
-Readings, 11 _ff._
-
-Record Office, the Public, 80, 179, 182-185
- Museum of the, 183, 184
-
-Red Cross Knights. _See_ Templars Lion Fields, 143
-
-Revels. See Inns of Court
-
-Reynolds, Sir Joshua, 69
-
-Robes of the Bar, 193, 194
-
-Rogers, Samuel, 93
-
-Rolls Chapel, 182-185
- Monuments, 183
- Master of the, 182 _ff._
-
-Romilly, Sir Samuel, 132, 136
-
-Roo, John, 150
-
-Rupert, Prince, 100
-
-Russell, Lord, 72, 121
-
-
-Sackville, Thomas, 65, 99
-
-Savoy, the, 36
-
-Scott, Sir G., 118
-
-Scrope’s Inn, 108, 195
-
-Scropes, Le, the, 108, 195, 196
-
-Selden, John, 87, 93, 167, 179
- grave of, 55
-
-Serjeants, the, 12, 13, 186 _ff._
- Abolition of the Order of, 194, 195
- the, at St. Paul’s, 190, 191
- Feasts, 192, 193
- Inn (Chancery Lane), 178, 179, 197-199
- Inn (Fleet Street), 92, 196, 197
- Inns, 12, 195 _ff._
- Robes of the, 193, 194
-
-Shadwell, William, 80
-
-Shakespeare, William, 42, 43, 75, 148, 150
- at the Temple, 24
- ‘Twelfth Night,’ 77, 78
-
-Shene, Convent of, 141
-
-Sheridan, Richard Brinsley, 20
-
-Shirley, James, 153
-
-Shoe Lane, 108
-
-Sidney, Sir Philip, 162
-
-Skipworth, W., 139
-
-Smirke, Sir Robert, 198
- Sydney, 96
-
-Soane, Sir John, Museum, 124-126
-
-Solicitors excluded from the Inns of Court, 166
-
-Somers, Lord Chancellor, 81
-
-Somerset, Earl of, 152
- House, 181
-
-Southey, Robert, 163
-
-Spedding, James, 96, 149, 151, 160
-
-Spenser, Edmund, 68, 69
-
-St. Anne, Chapel of. See Temple
-
-St. Dunstan’s Church, 178
-
-St. George’s Inn. See New Inn
-
-St. James’s Palace, 112
-
-St. John, Oliver, 130
- Order of. See Knights Hospitallers
-
-St. Paul’s Cathedral, 56, 67, 137
- the Serjeants and, 189-191, 195
-
-St. Thomas, Chapel of. See Temple
- Knights of, 190
-
-Staple Inn, 87, 137, 169-173
-
-Stapleton Inn, 35
-
-Steele, Richard, 66
-
-Stowell, Lord, 81
-
-Strand Inn, 180
- the, 35, 177
-
-Strange, Sir John, 183
-
-Street, 30, 178
- Architect, 1
-
-Sundials (Temple), 72, 73, 81 _n._, 95, 96
-
-Swift, Dean, 66
-
-
-Taylor, Sir Robert, 128
- Tom, 90, 91
-
-Templars, the Knights, 1, 2, 27 _ff._, 48, 98, 106, 171
- and the Serjeants, 188, 189
- badge of the, 31, 32
- customs of, 97
- decadence and dissolution of the Order of the, 33 _ff._
- effigies of, 46, 51-55
- origin of the Order, 27, 28
- settlement in England, 28 _ff._
-
-Temple, the, 29, 110
- a place of sanctuary, 60, 61
- attacked by Wat Tyler’s men, 36
-
-Temple Bar, 6-8
- Chapel of St. Thomas, 59, 189, 200
- Church, the, 44-59, 71, 74, 97
- Chapel of St. Anne, 48, 189
- dedication of the, 30, 31
- description of, 46-56
- Master of the, 57-59
- Master’s House, 47, 57, 58
- Cloisters, 59, 60
- Flower Show, 94
- Gardens, 6, 42, 43
- buildings, 74
-
-Temple, Inner, 6, 37, 86 _ff._ See Clifford’s Inn and Temple, Templars
- Benchers’ Garden, 196
- characteristics of the, 86, 87
- charter of the, 40, 41
- Clock Tower, 97
- Cloister Court, 60
- crest of the, 31, 32
- Crown Office Row, 89-91
- Farrar’s Buildings, 89
- Feasts, 192
- Fig-tree Court, 73, 93, 94
- Garden, 94, 95
- gateway, 1, 44, 45
- Gordon Rioters at, 132
- Hall, 38, 59, 65, 76, 96-99, 101
- Harcourt Buildings, 74
- Hare Court, 68, 89, 92, 93, 101
- Johnson’s Buildings, 44, 87
- King’s Bench Walk, 87, 91, 102-104
- Library, 96, 101, 102
- Mitre Court, 89, 92
- Buildings, 91, 92
- Paper Buildings, 89 _ff._, 93, 102
- Parliament, 18
- rebuilding of, 96
- Revels at, 98 _ff._
- solicitors excluded from, 166
- sundial, Temple Gardens, 95
- Tanfield Court, 97
- Treasurer’s House, 97
- Irishmen at the, 20
- Lane, 102
- lawyers first mentioned in, 37, 38
-
-Temple, Middle, 6, 37 _ff._, 45, 64 _ff._, 131. See Temple, Templars
- Brick Court, 68 _ff._, 90
- sundial in, 72
- Charter of, 40, 41
- crest of the, 31, 32
- Elizabethan sailors, 78
- Elm Court, 71
- Buildings, 74
- Essex Court, 81
- sundial, 81 _n._
- Fountain, 75, 82-84
- (or Hall) Court, 76
- Garden Court, 70, 84
- Gardens, 84
- gateways, 1, 65 _ff._, 74
- Goldsmith Buildings, 44, 71, 89
- Hall, 38, 68, 69, 74 _ff._
- Lamb Building, 60
- Library, 84, 85
- Little Gateway, 82
- New Court, 82
- Parliaments of, 154
- Plowden Buildings, 74, 84
- Pump Court, 73, 74
- sundial in, 73
- Rookery, 71, 72
- Vine Court, 74
-
-Temple, New, site of the, 29-31
- Outer, 35
- Refectory of the Priests, 59
- Stairs, 67
- St. Dunstan, 66
- the Old, 171
- Treasure House, 33, 34
-
-Temple, ‘Twelfth Night,’ 24
-
-Temples (Round Churches of the Templars), 28, 29
-
-Thackeray, W. M., quoted, 4, 60-63, 69, 71, 90, 176
-
-Thames, Embankment, 67, 74, 94
- River, 9, 29, 30, 67, 68, 74
-
-Thavie’s Inn, 5, 39, 176
-
-Theobald’s Road, 136, 159
-
-Thomson, Archbishop, 116
-
-Thurloe, --, 113
-
-Thurlow, Edward, Lord Chancellor, 93, 94
-
-Titus Gates, 7, 8
-
-Torrigiano, 183
-
-Turnstiles, the, 123
-
-Turton, Sir John, 146
-
-Tyler, Wat, Rebellion, 36
-
-
-Valence, Aymer de, 35, 36
-
-Virginia, 78
-
-
-Walpole, Horace, 121
-
-Warburton, Bishop, 116
-
-Warren, Samuel, 104
-
-Watts, G. F., fresco by, 120, 121
-
-Wellesley, Lord, 117
-
-Westbury, Lord Chancellor, 21
-
-Whitefriars, 29
-
-Whitelock, Bulstrode, 130
-
-Willes, C.J., 131, 194
-
-William IV., mandate of, 194
-
-Wine Office Court, 69
-
-Wither, George, 121
-
-Wolsey, Cardinal, 112, 150
-
-Wren, Sir Christopher, 2, 59, 65, 82, 87 _n._, 103
- Temple Bar, 7
-
-Wycherley, William, 80
-
-
-Yelverton, Sir C., 139, 146
-
-Young, Dr., 183
-
-
- THE END
-
-
- BILLING AND SONS, LTD., PRINTERS, GUILDFORD
-
-[Illustration: MAP ACCOMPANYING ‘INNS OF COURT.’ BY GORDON HOME AND
-CECIL HEADLAM. (A. AND C. BLACK, LONDON.)]
-
-
-FOOTNOTES:
-
- [1] ‘Survey of London.’
-
- [2] Dugdale, ‘Origines Juridiciales.’
-
- [3] Fortescue, ‘De Laudibus Legum.’
-
- [4] Bedwell, _Quarterly Review_, October, 1908.
-
- [5] Strype.
-
- [6] Pollock and Maitland, ‘History of English Law,’ vol. i., p. 102.
-
- [7] See my ‘Story of Oxford,’ chap. iv.
-
- [8] Kelly, ‘Short History of the English Bar.’
-
- [9] ‘The Glory of Generosity,’ quoted by Herbert, ‘Aniquities of the
- Inns of Court.’
-
- [10] Kelly, p. 56.
-
- [11] Kelly, p. 127.
-
- [12] Bellot, ‘Inner and Middle Temple,’ p. 36.
-
- [13] Dugdale.
-
- [14] MS. cited by Addison, ‘Knights Templars,’ p. 348.
-
- [15] ‘History of the Temple,’ pp. 64-67.
-
- [16] See Hutchinson, ‘Minutes of Parliament of Middle Temple,’ vol.
- i., p. 12.
-
- [17] An excellent little brochure on No. 17, Fleet Street, is
- published by the L.C.C., and obtainable in ‘Prince Henry’s Council
- Chamber.’
-
- [18] The site is marked by seven large stone slabs. Outside the north
- door of the old Hall stood the Chapel of St. Thomas. It was connected
- with the Cloisters, and thereby with the Chapel of St. Anne or with
- the present main entrance of the Temple Church. Indications of the old
- cloister are traceable in the present Buttery and the ancient chamber
- beneath it. The walls of this chamber are of rubble and Kentish rag,
- and the ceiling is supported by groined arches. Its floor is on the
- same level as that of the ancient Church. There is an open fireplace
- of later date. Mr. Inderwick takes this room to have been the old
- “Refectory of the Priests.”
-
- [19] ‘The Temple Church.’
-
- [20] _Cf._ ‘The Inns of Court and Chancery’ (W. J. Loftie).
-
- [21] ‘Origines Juridiciales.’
-
- [22] ‘Sepulchral Monuments,’ vol. i., pp. 24, 50.
-
- [23] Gough, ‘Sepulchral Monuments.’
-
- [24] Raised 2 feet in 1908, but otherwise unaltered.
-
- [25] Can only be visited by obtaining an order. It would be gracious
- of the Benchers to relax this restriction.
-
- [26] Bellot, ‘Inner and Middle Temple.’
-
- [27] Thackeray, ‘Pendennis.’
-
- [28] ‘Pendennis.’ Before migrating to No. 2, Brick Court, William
- Makepeace Thackeray lived at 10, Crown Office Row, probably sharing
- chambers, which have since disappeared, with Tom Taylor.
-
- [29] ‘Middle Temple Records.’
-
- [30] ‘Life of Wolsey.’
-
- [31] Bellot, p. 269.
-
- [32] ‘English Humourists.’
-
- [33] See Irving, ‘Goldsmith.’
-
- [34] Wheatley, ‘Literary Landmarks of London.’
-
- [35] Vol. v., p. 231.
-
- [36] Restored 1903.
-
- [37] ‘Diary of John Manningham, of the Middle Temple.’
-
- [38] _Quarterly Review_, October, 1908; _Green Bag_, April, 1908.
-
- [39] Upon the seventeenth-century block, which it replaced, there used
- to be a sundial, which has disappeared. Perhaps its motto, ‘Vestigia
- nulla retrorsum,’ was deemed too generous a warning against entering
- upon the perilous paths of litigation.
-
- [40] Dickens, ‘Martin Chuzzlewit.’
-
- [41] Those of Nos. 4 and 5 are attributed to Sir Christopher Wren.
-
- [42] His portrait, by Van Somer, hangs in the Hall.
-
- [43] Inderwick, ‘Inner Temple Records,’ vol. ii., p. lxii.
-
- [44] Inderwick, ‘Inner Temple Records,’ vol. i., p. xxiv. _Cf._ p. 48,
- _supra_.
-
- [45] Bellot.
-
- [46] The last occasion of a Revel taking place in the Halls of the
- Inns of Court was upon the elevation of Mr. Talbot to the woolsack
- (1734). Then, after dinner, the Benchers all assembled in the Great
- Hall of the Inner Temple, and a large ring having been formed round
- the fireplace, the Master of the Revels took the Lord Chancellor by
- the hand, who with his left took Mr. Justice Page, and the other
- serjeants and benchers being joined together, all danced about the
- fireplace three times, while the ancient song, ‘Round about our Coal
- Fire,’ accompanied by music, was sung by the Comedian, Tony Aston,
- dressed as a barrister. This song of the House has unfortunately been
- lost.
-
- [47] Bellot, ‘Inner and Middle Temple,’ p. 49.
-
- [48] _Notes and Queries_, April 2, 1892.
-
- [49] Duchy of Lancaster, Ancient Deeds, L, 137; Close Rolls, 14 Edward
- I., M, 2d.
-
- [50] Quoted by Stow.
-
- [51] Loftie, p. 53.
-
- [52] Dugdale.
-
- [53] ‘Life of Dr. Donne,’ by Izaak Walton.
-
- [54] ‘Black Book of Lincoln’s Inn.’
-
- [55] _Ibid._
-
- [56] Loftie.
-
- [57] Cf. _Daily Telegraph_, January 4, 1909.
-
- [58] Kelly, ‘Short History of the English Bar.’
-
- [59] Stow, vol. i., p. 11; ed. Kingsford.
-
- [60] Douthwaite, ‘Notes on Gray’s Inn,’ 1876.
-
- [61] Luttrell’s ‘Diary,’ June 10, 1684, quoted by Douthwaite.
-
- [62] Douthwaite, p. 175.
-
- [63] Enumerated by Douthwaite, ‘Gray’s Inn,’ 1886, and, with plates,
- by Dugdale.
-
- [64] _Cf._ Professor A. V. Dicey, in the _Nineteenth Century_,
- September, 1903.
-
- [65] Spedding, ‘Life and Letters of Francis Bacon.’
-
- [66] Halliwell-Phillipps, ‘Outlines of the Life of Shakespeare,’ p.
- 104.
-
- [67] _Op. cit._, vol. i., p. 342.
-
- [68] ‘Master Worsley’s Book’--Observations on the Constitution, etc.,
- of the Middle Temple. Written, 1733.
-
- [69] To commemorate the centenary of this date a bronze statue of the
- Philosopher is shortly to be placed in the centre of the grass plot in
- South Square.
-
- [70] W. J. Broderip, _Fraser’s Magazine_, 1857.
-
- [71] _Cf._ _Edinburgh Review_, vol. cxxxiv., p. 488.
-
- [72] ‘Calendar of Inner Temple Records,’ vol. i., p. xiii.
-
- [73] Historical MSS. Commission, XII., part i., vol. i., p. 60.
-
- [74] By a charter of Edward IV., 1463, the Staple of wools was set at
- Leadenhall.
-
- [75] _Cf._ ‘Staple Inn,’ by E. Williams, F.R.G.S., p. 100.
-
- [76] Douthwaite, p. 257.
-
- [77] _Notes and Queries_, April 2, 1892.
-
- [78] A full descriptive catalogue, drawn up by Sir Henry Maxwell Lyte,
- is obtainable at the Public Record Office.
-
- [79] ‘Black Books of Lincoln’s Inn,’ vol. i., p. xxxix.
-
- [80] See Serjeant Pulling, ‘The Order of the Coif.’
-
- [81] _Notes and Queries_, April 2, 1892.
-
- [82] Fetter Lane is said to be derived from ‘Fewters,’ as the abode of
- vagrants, cheats, and fortune-tellers.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Inns of Court, by Cecil Headlam
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE INNS OF COURT ***
-
-***** This file should be named 55062-0.txt or 55062-0.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/5/5/0/6/55062/
-
-Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images available at The Internet Archive)
-
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
-will be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
-one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
-(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
-permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
-set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
-copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
-protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
-Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
-charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
-do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
-rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
-such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
-research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
-practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
-subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
-redistribution.
-
-
-
-*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
-http://gutenberg.org/license).
-
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
-all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
-If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
-terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
-entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
-and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
-or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
-collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
-individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
-located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
-copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
-works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
-are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
-Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
-freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
-this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
-the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
-keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
-a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
-the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
-before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
-creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
-Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
-the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
-States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
-access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
-whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
-copied or distributed:
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
-from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
-posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
-and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
-or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
-with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
-work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
-through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
-Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
-1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
-terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
-to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
-permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
-word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
-distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
-"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
-posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
-you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
-copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
-request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
-form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
-that
-
-- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
- owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
- has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
- Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
- must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
- prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
- returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
- sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
- address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
- the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or
- destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
- and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
- Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
- money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
- of receipt of the work.
-
-- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
-forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
-both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
-Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
-Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
-collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
-"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
-corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
-property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
-computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
-your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
-your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
-the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
-refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
-providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
-receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
-is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
-opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
-WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
-WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
-If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
-law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
-interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
-the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
-provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
-with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
-promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
-harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
-that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
-or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
-work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
-Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
-
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
-including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
-because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
-people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
-To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
-and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
-Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
-http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
-permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
-Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
-throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
-809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
-business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
-information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
-page at http://pglaf.org
-
-For additional contact information:
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
-SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
-particular state visit http://pglaf.org
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
-To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
-
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
-with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
-Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
-
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
-unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
-keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
-
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
-
- http://www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/old/55062-0.zip b/old/55062-0.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index 631918b..0000000
--- a/old/55062-0.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h.zip b/old/55062-h.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index 55b3f0c..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/55062-h.htm b/old/55062-h/55062-h.htm
deleted file mode 100644
index 2b22287..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/55062-h.htm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6166 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
-"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
-
-<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
- <head> <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" />
-<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
-<title>
- The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Inns Of Court, by Gordon Home.
-</title>
-<style type="text/css">
- p {margin-top:.2em;text-align:justify;margin-bottom:.2em;text-indent:4%;}
-
-.c {text-align:center;text-indent:0%;}
-
-.cb {text-align:center;text-indent:0%;font-weight:bold;}
-
-.cov {text-align:center;text-indent:0%;text-decoration:overline;
-margin-top:2em;}
-
- ul {list-style-type:none;text-indent:-1em;margin-left:15%;}
-
-.lftspc {margin-left:.25em;}
-
-.nind {text-indent:0%;}
-
-.nonvis {display:inline;}
- @media all
- {.nonvis
- {display: none;}
- }
-
-.rt {text-align:right;}
-
-small {font-size: 70%;}
-
-big {font-size: 130%;}
-
- h1 {margin-top:5%;text-align:center;clear:both;}
-
- h2 {margin-top:4%;margin-bottom:2%;text-align:center;clear:both;
- font-size:120%;}
-
- hr {width:100%;margin:.1em auto .1em auto;clear:both;color:black;}
-
- hr.full {width: 60%;margin:2% auto 2% auto;border-top:1px solid black;
-padding:.1em;border-bottom:1px solid black;border-left:none;border-right:none;}
-
- table {margin-top:2%;margin-bottom:2%;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;border:none;}
-
-th {padding-top:.5em;}
-
- body{margin-left:4%;margin-right:6%;background:#ffffff;color:black;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;font-size:medium;}
-
-a:link {background-color:#ffffff;color:blue;text-decoration:none;}
-
- link {background-color:#ffffff;color:blue;text-decoration:none;}
-
-a:visited {background-color:#ffffff;color:purple;text-decoration:none;}
-
-a:hover {background-color:#ffffff;color:#FF0000;text-decoration:underline;}
-
-.smcap {font-variant:small-caps;font-size:100%;}
-
- img {border:24px solid #e5e8e8 ;}
-
-.bbox {border:solid 1px black;margin:auto auto;
-max-width:50%;padding:1em;font-size:85%;}
-
-.bboxx {border:solid 1px black;padding:.5em;}
-
-.caption {font-weight:bold;font-size:75%;}
-
-.figcenter {margin-top:3%;margin-bottom:3%;clear:both;
-margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;text-align:center;text-indent:0%;}
- @media all
- {.figcenter
- {page-break-before: avoid;page-break-after: avoid;}
- }
-
-.footnotes {border:dotted 3px gray;margin-top:5%;clear:both;}
-
-.footnote {width:95%;margin:auto 3% 1% auto;font-size:0.9em;position:relative;}
-
-.label {position:relative;left:-.5em;top:0;text-align:left;font-size:.8em;}
-
-.fnanchor {vertical-align:30%;font-size:.8em;}
-
-div.poetry {text-align:center;}
-div.poem {font-size:90%;margin:auto auto;text-indent:0%;
-display: inline-block; text-align: left;}
-.poem .stanza {margin-top: 1em;margin-bottom:1em;}
-.poem .stanza1 {margin-top: 1em;margin-bottom:1em;font-size:90%;}
-.poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
-.poem span.i1 {display: block; margin-left: .35em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
-.poem span.i2 {display: block; margin-left: 1em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
-.poem span.i5 {display: block; margin-left: 3.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
-.poem span.i12 {display: block; margin-left: 11em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
-
-.pagenum {font-style:normal;position:absolute;
-left:95%;font-size:55%;text-align:right;color:gray;
-background-color:#ffffff;font-variant:normal;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0em;}
-@media print, handheld
-{.pagenum
- {display: none;}
- }
-
-.poem span.i7 {display: block; margin-left: 7em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;}
-</style>
- </head>
-<body>
-
-
-<pre>
-
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Inns of Court, by Cecil Headlam
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-
-Title: The Inns of Court
-
-Author: Cecil Headlam
-
-Illustrator: Gordon Home
-
-Release Date: July 6, 2017 [EBook #55062]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE INNS OF COURT ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images available at The Internet Archive)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-</pre>
-
-<hr class="full" />
-
-<p class="figcenter">
-<a href="images/cover_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/cover.jpg" style="border:none;" height="500" alt="[Image
-of the book's cover unavailable.]" /></a>
-</p>
-
-<p class="cb">THE INNS OF COURT</p>
-
-<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary=""
-style="border: 2px black solid;margin:2em auto 2em auto;max-width:50%;
-padding:1%;">
-<tr><td>
-
-<p class="c"><a href="#CONTENTS">Contents</a></p>
-
-<p class="c"><a href="#LIST_OF_ILLUSTRATIONS">List of Illustrations</a><br /> <span class="nonvis">(In certain versions of this etext [in certain browsers]
-clicking o the image,
-will bring up a larger version.)</span></p>
-<p class="c"><a href="#INDEX">Index</a>:
-<a href="#A">A</a>,
-<a href="#B">B</a>,
-<a href="#C">C</a>,
-<a href="#D">D</a>,
-<a href="#E">E</a>,
-<a href="#F">F</a>,
-<a href="#G">G</a>,
-<a href="#H">H</a>,
-<a href="#I-i">I</a>,
-<a href="#J">J</a>,
-<a href="#K">K</a>,
-<a href="#L">L</a>,
-<a href="#M">M</a>,
-<a href="#N">N</a>,
-<a href="#O">O</a>,
-<a href="#P">P</a>,
-<a href="#Q">Q</a>,
-<a href="#R">R</a>,
-<a href="#S">S</a>,
-<a href="#T">T</a>,
-<a href="#V-i">V</a>,
-<a href="#W">W</a>,
-<a href="#Y">Y</a>.</p>
-<p class="c">(etext transcriber's note)</p></td></tr>
-</table>
-
-<div class="bbox">
-<p class="cb"><span class="smcap">Uniform with this Volume</span><br />
-&nbsp;</p>
-<div class="bboxx">
-<p class="cb"><big>WESTMINSTER ABBEY</big></p>
-
-<p class="nind">PAINTED BY JOHN FULLEYLOVE, R.I. DESCRIBED BY MRS. A. MURRAY SMITH</p>
-
-<p class="nind">CONTAINING 21 FULL-PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS IN COLOUR. SQ. DEMY 8VO., CLOTH,
-GILT TOP PRICE <b>7/6</b> NET (POST FREE, PRICE 7/11)</p>
-
-<p>“In general appearance, in wealth of illustration, and in
-trustworthy letterpress, it is a charming book.”&mdash;<i>Guardian.</i></p>
-
-<hr />
-
-<p class="cb"><big>THE TOWER OF<br /> LONDON</big></p>
-
-<p class="nind">PAINTED BY JOHN FULLEYLOVE, R.I. DESCRIBED BY ARTHUR POYSER</p>
-
-<p class="nind">CONTAINING 20 FULL-PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS IN COLOUR. SQ. DEMY 8VO., CLOTH,
-GILT TOP PRICE <b>7/6</b> NET (POST FREE, PRICE 7/11)</p>
-
-<p>“Perhaps one of the best books of modern times on the great
-fortification.... The fine paintings by Mr. John Fulleylove give
-added charm to the book.”&mdash;<i>Globe.</i></p></div>
-
-<p class="c"><span class="smcap">A. &amp; C. Black. Soho Square. London, W.</span></p>
-</div>
-
-<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" summary=""
-style="font-size:75%;">
-<tr valign="top"><td class="c" colspan="2">AGENTS</td></tr>
-<tr valign="top"><td><b>AMERICA</b></td><td align="left">THE MACMILLAN COMPANY<br /> <span class="smcap">64 &amp; 66 Fifth Avenue, NEW YORK</span></td></tr>
-<tr valign="top"><td><b>AUSTRALASIA</b></td><td align="left">OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS<br /> <span class="smcap">205 Flinders Lane, MELBOURNE</span></td></tr>
-<tr valign="top"><td><b>CANADA</b></td><td align="left">THE MACMILLAN COMPANY OF CANADA, LTD.<br /> <span class="smcap">27 Richmond Street West, TORONTO</span></td></tr>
-<tr valign="top"><td><b>INDIA</b></td><td align="left">MACMILLAN &amp; COMPANY, LTD.<br />
-<span class="smcap">Macmillan Building, BOMBAY</span><br />
-<span class="smcap">309 Bow Bazaar Street, CALCUTTA</span></td></tr>
-</table>
-
-<p><a name="front" id="front"></a></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_001" id="ill_001"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 349px;">
-<a href="images/ill_001_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_001_sml.jpg" width="349" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<br />
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">OLD HALL AND OLD SQUARE FROM THE TOWER OF THE NEW HALL,
-LINCOLN’S INN</p>
-
-<p class="nind">On the left is the Old Hall, dating from the reign of Edward VI.
-(circa 1555), and the scene of the Chancery case of Jarndyce v.
-Jarndyce in ‘Bleak House.’ Beyond the Hall are the red roofs of Old
-Square, and in the distance the domes of the Central Criminal Court and
-St. Paul’s, the latter appearing over a portion of the buildings of the
-Record Office.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<h1>THE &nbsp; INNS<br />
-OF &nbsp;COURT</h1>
-
-<p class="cb"><big>
-PAINTED<br />
-BY·GORDON·HOME<br />
-DESCRIBED<br />
-BY·CECIL·HEADLAM</big><br />
-<br />
-<img src="images/colophon.jpg"
-style="border:none;"
-width="75"
-alt=""
-/><br />
-<br />
-LONDON<br />
-ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK<br />
-1909<br />
-</p>
-
-<h2><a name="CONTENTS" id="CONTENTS"></a>CONTENTS</h2>
-
-<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" summary="">
-<tr><td>&nbsp;</td><td class="rt"><small>PAGE</small></td></tr>
-
-<tr><th colspan="2"><a href="#CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I</a></th></tr>
-
-<tr><td valign="top"><span class="smcap">Origin of the Inns</span></td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_001">1</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><th colspan="2"><a href="#CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II</a></th></tr>
-
-<tr><td valign="top"><span class="smcap">The Knights Templars</span></td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_027">27</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><th colspan="2"><a href="#CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III</a></th></tr>
-
-<tr><td valign="top"><span class="smcap">The Temple Church</span></td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_044">44</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><th colspan="2"><a href="#CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV</a></th></tr>
-
-<tr><td valign="top"><span class="smcap">The Middle Temple</span></td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_054">54</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><th colspan="2"><a href="#CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V</a></th></tr>
-
-<tr><td valign="top"><span class="smcap">The Inner Temple</span></td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_086">86</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><th colspan="2"><a href="#CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI</a></th></tr>
-
-<tr><td valign="top"><span class="smcap">Lincoln’s Inn and the Devil’s Own</span></td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_106">106</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><th colspan="2"><a href="#CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII</a></th></tr>
-
-<tr><td valign="top"><span class="smcap">Gray’s Inn</span></td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_135">135</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><th colspan="2"><a href="#CHAPTER_VIII">CHAPTER VIII</a></th></tr>
-
-<tr><td valign="top"><span class="smcap">Inns of Chancery</span></td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_165">165</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><th colspan="2"><a href="#CHAPTER_IX">CHAPTER IX</a></th></tr>
-
-<tr><td valign="top"><span class="smcap">The Serjeants and Serjeants’ Inns</span></td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_186">186</a></td></tr>
-</table>
-
-<h2><a name="LIST_OF_ILLUSTRATIONS" id="LIST_OF_ILLUSTRATIONS"></a>LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS</h2>
-
-<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" summary="">
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_001">1.</a></td><td valign="top">Old Hall and Old Square from the Tower of the New Hall, Lincoln’s Inn&nbsp; &nbsp; </td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#front"><i>Frontispiece</i></a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td>&nbsp;</td>
-<td>&nbsp;</td>
-<td class="rt"><small>FACING PAGE</small></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_002">2.</a></td><td valign="top"> Middle Temple Lane</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_006">6</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_003">3.</a></td><td valign="top"> Interior of the Middle Temple Hall</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_020">20</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_004">4.</a></td><td valign="top"> Lamb Building from Pump Court, Temple</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_034">34</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_005">5.</a></td><td valign="top"> Interior of the Temple Church</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_046">46</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_006">6.</a></td><td valign="top"> The East End of the Temple Church and the Master’s House</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_056">56</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_007">7.</a></td><td valign="top"> The Middle Temple Gatehouse in Fleet Street</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_066">66</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_008">8.</a></td><td valign="top"> Fountain Court and Middle Temple Hall</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_074">74</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_009">9.</a></td><td valign="top"> Middle Temple Library</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_084">84</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_010">10.</a></td><td valign="top"> Hall and Library, Inner Temple</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_094">94</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_011">11.</a></td><td valign="top"> No. 5, King’s Bench Walk, Inner Temple</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_102">102</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_012">12.</a></td><td valign="top"> Old Square, Lincoln’s Inn</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_112">112</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_013">13.</a></td><td valign="top"> The New Gateway and Hall of Lincoln’s Inn</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_118">118</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_014">14.</a></td><td valign="top"> Stone Buildings, Lincoln’s Inn, from the Gardens</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_128">128</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_015">15.</a></td><td valign="top"> A Doorway in South Square, Gray’s Inn</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_144">144</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_016">16.</a></td><td valign="top"> Gray’s Inn Square</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_154">154</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_017">17.</a></td><td valign="top"> The Gabled Houses outside Staple Inn, Holborn</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_164">164</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_018">18.</a></td><td valign="top"> Staple Inn Hall and Courtyard</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_172">172</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_019">19.</a></td><td valign="top"> The Great Hall of the Royal Courts of Justice</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_176">176</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td class="rt" valign="top"><a href="#ill_020">20.</a></td><td valign="top"> Clifford’s Inn</td><td class="rt" valign="bottom"><a href="#page_184">184</a></td></tr>
-
-<tr><td colspan="3" class="c"><a href="#ill_021"><i>Sketch-plan at end of volume.</i></a></td></tr>
-</table>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_001" id="page_001"></a>{1}</span></p>
-
-<h1>THE &nbsp; INNS &nbsp; OF &nbsp; COURT</h1>
-
-<h2><a name="CHAPTER_I" id="CHAPTER_I"></a>CHAPTER I<br /><br />
-<small>ORIGIN OF THE INNS</small></h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">The</span> features of every ancient City are marked with the wrinkles and the
-scars of Time. The narrow lanes, the winding streets, the huddled
-houses, the blind alleys form, as it were, the furrows upon her aged
-countenance. They contribute enormously to the charm and beauty of her
-riper years, for they point to a life rich in experience and varied
-reminiscences. But, like other wrinkles, they have their drawbacks. As
-the bottle-neck of Bond Street, which blocks the traffic half the
-season, is the direct topographical result of the river which once
-flowed thereabouts, so the boundary of the property of the Knights
-Templars, marked by the Inner and Middle Temple Gateways, imposes the
-southern limit of Fleet Street, opposite to Street’s Gothic pile of Law
-Courts and to Chancery Lane. Hence the narrowness of that famous street,
-and<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_002" id="page_002"></a>{2}</span> the consequent congestion of traffic on the main route to the City.
-Then come the Beauty Doctors, who smooth out the old wrinkles, and
-broaden the ancient, narrow lines, which Time has cut so deeply on the
-face of the Town. The old landmarks are removed, and Wren’s gateways and
-buildings must disappear in order that broad, straight paths be driven
-right to the sanctuary of Business.</p>
-
-<p>And yet the old influences and the effects of historic movements and
-historic events persist, and will persist. It may seem far-fetched to
-say that everyone whose business or pleasure takes him to Fleet Street
-is directly subject to the influence of the Crusades. Yet it is so. But
-for those strange wars of mingled religious enthusiasm and commercial
-aggression, there would have been no Templars, and had there been no
-Templars, the whole nomenclature and topographical arrangement of this
-part of London would have been different; for the Societies of Lawyers,
-who succeeded to their property, succeeded, of course, to the boundaries
-of the messuages, as to the Round Church of the Knights Templars.</p>
-
-<p>Of the Temple, and the Templars, and their successors, we shall deal
-more at length in their proper places. It will be convenient first to
-consider what<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_003" id="page_003"></a>{3}</span> these Societies of Lawyers were and are, how they arose,
-and why they settled in the particular vicinity wherein they have chosen
-to set their ‘dusty purlieus.’</p>
-
-<p>William the Conqueror had established the Law Courts in his Palace. The
-great officers of State and the Barons were the Judges of this King’s
-Court&mdash;<i>Aula Regis</i>&mdash;which developed into three distinct divisions:
-King’s Bench and Common Pleas, under a Chief Justice, and Exchequer,
-where a Chief Baron presided to try all causes relating to the royal
-revenue. It was the business of a Norman King to ride about the country
-settling the affairs of the realm, which was his estate, and
-administering justice. The great Court of Justice, therefore, naturally
-accompanied the King in all his progresses, and suitors were obliged to
-follow and to find him, travelling for that purpose from all parts of
-the country to London, to Exeter, or to York.</p>
-
-<p>It was a system that was found ‘cumbersome, painful, and chargeable to
-the people,’ as Stow<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> puts it, and one of the provisions of Magna
-Charta accordingly enacted that the Court of Common Pleas should no
-longer follow the King, but be<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_004" id="page_004"></a>{4}</span> held in some determined place. The place
-determined was Westminster. The Court was held, though not at first, in
-the famous Hall, which William Rufus had erected and Richard II.
-rebuilt.</p>
-
-<p>It was to be expected that the fixing of the Courts would be followed by
-the settlement of ‘Students in the Law and the Ministers of each
-Court,’<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> as Dugdale has it, somewhere near at hand. Advocates had been
-drawn at first from the ranks of the clergy. This was natural enough,
-seeing that they formed the only educated class of the day. <i>Nullus
-clericus nisi causidicus</i>, the historian complains. It was equally
-natural that in the course of time objection should be taken to the
-spectacle of the professors of Christianity wrangling at the Bar, and
-monopolizing the power born of legal knowledge. Dugdale notes the first
-instance of an attempt to check their presence in the Courts as
-occurring at the beginning of the reign of Henry III. The clergy were at
-length excluded from practising in the Civil Courts, and a privileged
-class of lay Lawyers came into existence. Edward I. specially appointed
-the Justices of the Court of Common Pleas to ‘ordain from every County
-certain Attorneys and Lawyers of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_005" id="page_005"></a>{5}</span> best and most apt for their
-learning and skill, who might do service to his Court and People, and
-who alone should follow his Court and transact affairs therein.’</p>
-
-<p>And at this date, or shortly after it, we may assume that ‘students in
-the University of the Laws’<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> began to congregate in Hostels, or Inns,
-of Court, in order to study as ‘apprentices’ in the Guild of Law. For,
-as at Oxford or Cambridge, an Inn, or Hostel of residence, was the
-natural necessary requirement of such students when they began to come
-in numbers to sit at the feet of their teachers, the Masters of Law. The
-earliest mention of an Inn for housing apprentices of the Law occurs in
-1344, in a demise from the Lady Clifford of the house near Fleet Street,
-called Clifford’s Inn, to the <i>apprenticiis de banco</i>, the lawyers
-belonging to the Court of Common Pleas. And Thavie’s Inn was similarly
-leased from one John Thavie, ‘a worthy citizen and armourer,’ of London,
-who died in 1348. In such hostels, leased to the senior members,
-voluntary associations, or guilds of teachers and learners of law would
-congregate, and gradually evolve their own regulations and customs.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_006" id="page_006"></a>{6}</span></p>
-
-<p>Other references occur to the ‘apprentices in hostels’ during this same
-reign (Edward III.). And from about this date the four Inns of
-Court&mdash;Gray’s Inn, Lincoln’s Inn, and the Inner and Middle
-Temple&mdash;‘which are almost coincident in antiquity, similar in
-constitution, and identical in purpose,’<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> begin to emerge from the
-mists of the past.</p>
-
-<p>It is noticeable that all the Inns of Court and Chancery cluster about
-the borders of the City Ward called Faringdon Without, and were once
-placed, as old Sir John Fortescue observed, ‘in the suburbs, out of the
-noise and turmoil of the City.’</p>
-
-<p>The Lawyers were thus conveniently placed between the seat of judicature
-at Westminster and the centre of business in the City of London, and
-secured the advantage of ‘ready access to the one and plenty of
-provisions in the other.’ In the wall which bounds the Temple Gardens
-upon the modern Embankment of the Thames is set a stone which marks the
-western boundary of the Liberty of the City and the spot where Queen
-Victoria received the City Sword (1900); the old Bar of the City, which
-took its name from the Temple, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_007" id="page_007"></a>{7}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_002" id="ill_002"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 357px;">
-<a href="images/ill_003_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_003_sml.jpg" width="357" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">MIDDLE TEMPLE LANE</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">The</span> overhanging buildings just inside Sir Christopher Wren’s Gateway in
-Fleet Street (see <a href="#page_067">p. 67</a>).</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Holborn Bar, marked the limit farther north. It is to be remembered that
-this famous Temple Bar did not mark the boundary of the City proper, but
-only of the later extension known as the Liberty of the City, and the
-Temple buildings within the Bar were yet without the narrower boundary
-of the City.</p>
-
-<p>Temple Bar consisted originally of a post, rails, and chain. Next, a
-house of timber was erected across the street, with a narrow gateway and
-entry on the south side under the house.<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> This was superseded about
-1670 by the stone gate-house, designed by Christopher Wren, which was
-the scene of so many historic pageants when Lord Mayors have received
-their Sovereigns, and presented to them the keys of the City. It was
-here, notably, that the Lord Mayor delivered the City sword to good
-Queen Bess when she rode to St. Paul’s to return thanks for the victory
-over the Spanish Armada. Hereon, as upon London Bridge, the heads of
-famous criminals or rebels were stuck to warn the passers-by; and in the
-pillory here stood Titus Oates and Daniel de Foe&mdash;the latter for
-publishing his scandalous and seditious pamphlet, ‘The Shortest Way with
-the Dissenters.’ The<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_008" id="page_008"></a>{8}</span> citizens, however, pelted De Foe, not with rotten
-eggs, but with flowers. This noble gate-house was removed when the
-Strand was widened and the new Law Courts erected. It was rebuilt at
-Meux Park, Waltham Cross, and its original site is marked by a column
-surmounted by a griffin, representing the City arms (1880).</p>
-
-<p>It would appear that the Lawyers in choosing sites just outside the City
-boundaries for the Inns of their University were further influenced by
-the ordinance of Henry III. (1234), which enjoined the Mayor and
-Sheriffs to see to it that ‘no man should set up Schools of Law within
-the City.’ The object of this prohibition is a matter of dispute;
-Stubbs, for instance, maintaining that it applied to Canon Law, and
-others<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> that only Civil Law was intended, the object being to confine
-the clergy to the Theology and Canon Law, which seemed more properly
-their province.</p>
-
-<p>By the middle of the fourteenth century, then, we find the students of
-what we may call a London University of National Law established in
-their Inns or Hostels, which clustered about the boundaries of the City,
-from Holborn to Chancery Lane, from<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_009" id="page_009"></a>{9}</span> Fleet Street to the River. The
-Schools of Law, of which this University was composed, were
-distinctively English, and the University itself developed upon the
-peculiarly English lines of a College system, closely similar to that of
-Oxford and Cambridge. The Inns of Court and Chancery were the Colleges
-of Lawyers in the London University of Jurisprudence.</p>
-
-<p>Here dwelt, and here were trained for the Courts those guilds or
-fraternities of Lawyers, according to a scheme of oral and practical
-education which they gradually evolved. Trade Guilds were the basis of
-medieval social life, and medieval Universities were, in fact, nothing
-more nor less than Guilds of Study.<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> The four Inns of Court survive
-to-day as instances of the old Guilds of Law in London, and the lawyers,
-in their relations with the Courts, the public and solicitors, seem to
-represent still a highly organized Trade Union.</p>
-
-<p>The Inns of Court, then, have always exhibited, and still retain, the
-salient features of a University based upon the procedure of the
-medieval Guild. Just as, in other Universities, no one was allowed to
-teach until he had served an apprenticeship of terms, and, having been
-duly approved by the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_010" id="page_010"></a>{10}</span> Masters of their Art, had received his degree or
-diploma of teaching; just as no butcher or tailor was allowed to ply his
-trade until he had qualified himself and had been duly approved by the
-Masters of his Guild, so in the Masters of these Guilds of Law was
-vested the monopoly of granting the legal degree, or call to practise at
-the Bar, to apprentices who had served a stipulated term of study and
-passed the ordeal of certain oral and practical preparation. And as
-though to emphasize beyond dispute the Collegiate nature of these
-Societies, we find that each one of them made haste to provide itself
-with buildings and surroundings, which still present to us, in the midst
-of the dirt and turmoil of busy London, something of the charm and
-seclusion and self-sufficiency of an Oxford College, with its Hall and
-Chapel, its residential buildings, its Library, and grassy quadrangles,
-and its Gateway to insure its privacy.</p>
-
-<p>The same system of discipline, of celibate life, of a common Hall, of
-residence in community, and of compulsory attendance at the services of
-the Church, which marked the ordinary life of a medieval University, was
-repeated at the Inns of Court.</p>
-
-<p>And the kind of Collegiate Order into which<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_011" id="page_011"></a>{11}</span> they shaped themselves was
-also shown by the several grades existing within the Societies
-themselves. The word ‘barrister’ itself perpetuates the ancient
-discipline of the Inns, where the dais of the governing body, or
-Benchers, corresponding to the High Table of an Oxford College, was
-separated by a bar from the profane crowd of the Hall. The Halls of the
-Inns were not only the scenes of that business of eating and drinking,
-the ‘dinners’ to which so much attention was devoted, and by which the
-students ‘eat their way to the Bench,’ but also the centres of the
-social life and educational system of these Guilds.</p>
-
-<p>Dugdale gives at length the degrees of Tables in the Halls of the
-Inns&mdash;the Benchers’ Tables, the tables of the Utter Barristers, the
-tables of the Inner-Bar, and the Clerks’ Commons, and, without the
-screen, the Yeoman’s Table for Benchers’ Clerks.</p>
-
-<p>The <i>Utter-</i> or <i>Outer Barristers</i> ranked next to the Benchers. They
-were the advanced students who, after they had attained a certain
-standing, were called from the body of the Hall to the first place
-outside the bar for the purpose of taking part in the <i>moots</i> or public
-debates on points of law. The <i>Inner Barristers</i> assembled near the
-centre of the Hall.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_012" id="page_012"></a>{12}</span></p>
-
-<p>‘For the space of seven years or thereabouts,’ says Stow, ‘they frequent
-readings, meetings, boltinges, and other learned exercises, whereby
-growing ripe in the knowledge of the lawes, and approved withal to be of
-honest conversation, they are either by the general consent of the
-Benchers or Readers, being of the most auncient, grave and iudiciall men
-of everie Inn of the Court, or by the special priviledge of the present
-Reader there, selected and called to the degree of Utter Barristers, and
-so enabled to be Common Counsellors, and to practise the law, both in
-their Chambers, and at the Barres.’</p>
-
-<p>Readers, to help the younger students, were chosen from the Utter
-Barristers. From the Utter Barristers, too, were chosen by the Benchers
-‘the chiefest and best learned’ to increase the number of the Bench and
-to be Readers there also. After this ‘second reading’ the young
-Barrister was named an Apprentice at the Law, and might be advanced at
-the pleasure of the Prince, as Stow says, to the place of Serjeant, ‘and
-from the number of Serjeants also the void places of Judges are likewise
-ordinarily filled.’ ‘From thenceforth they hold not any roome in those
-Innes of Court, being translated to the Serjeants’ Innes, where none<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_013" id="page_013"></a>{13}</span>
-but the Serjeants and Judges do converse’ (Stow, i., pp. 78, 79).</p>
-
-<p>Upon the Benchers, or Ancients, devolved the government of the Inn, and
-from their number a treasurer was chosen annually.</p>
-
-<p><i>Readings</i> and <i>Mootings</i> would seem to have been the chief forms of
-legal training provided by the Societies, and they may be said roughly
-to represent the theoretical and practical side of their system of
-education. As to Readings, the procedure in general was as follows:
-Every year the Benchers chose two Readers, who entered upon their duties
-to the accompaniment of the most elaborate ceremonial and feasting. Then
-upon certain solemn occasions it was the duty of one of them to deliver
-a lecture upon some statute rich in nice points of law. The Reader would
-first explain the whole matter at large, and after summing up the
-various arguments bearing on the case, would deliver his opinion. The
-Utter Barristers then discussed with him the points that had been
-raised, after which some of the Judges and Serjeants present gave their
-opinions in turn.<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a></p>
-
-<p>I have referred to the <i>feasting</i> that attended the appointment of the
-Readers. We have seen that<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_014" id="page_014"></a>{14}</span> medieval Universities were Guilds of
-Learning, scholastic fraternities of masters or students, who framed
-rules and exacted compliance with certain tests of skill, precisely in
-the same way as did the masters and apprentices of ordinary manual
-trades. It was a universal feature of the Guilds, whether of manual
-crafts or of Learning, that the newly-elected Master was expected to
-entertain the Fraternity to which he had been admitted, or in which he
-had just been raised to the full honours of Mastership. And just as at
-Oxford, Cambridge, or Paris, a Master was obliged to give a feast, or
-even some more sumptuous form of hospitality, such as a tilt or tourney,
-upon the attainment of his degree, so at the Inns of Court the
-newly-appointed Reader was obliged by custom to entertain the Benchers
-and Barristers in Hall. It was the general experience everywhere that
-such entertainments tended to increase in splendour and costliness, and
-to be a severe tax upon the resources of the new Masters, and a check,
-consequently, upon the number of aspirants. So here the excessive
-charges attending Readers’ feasts led to a decrease in the Readers,
-which was regarded as tending to ‘an utter overthrow to the learning and
-study of the Law,’ and the Justices<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_015" id="page_015"></a>{15}</span> of both Benches accordingly issued
-an order insisting upon their observance, and at the same time
-regulating the amount that a Reader might expend upon ‘diet in the
-Hall.’</p>
-
-<p><i>Moots</i> were a kind of rehearsal of real trials at the Bar. They were
-cases argued in Hall by the Utter and Inner Barristers before the
-Benchers.</p>
-
-<p>When the horn had blown to dinner, says Dugdale, a paper containing
-notice of the Case which was to be argued after dinner was laid upon the
-salt. Then, after dinner, in open Hall, the mock-trial began. An Inner
-Barrister advanced to the table, and there propounded in Law-French&mdash;an
-exceedingly hybrid lingo&mdash;some kind of action on behalf of an imaginary
-client. Another Inner Barrister replied in defence of the fictitious
-defendant, and the Reader and Benchers gave their opinions in turn.</p>
-
-<p>As in other Universities, other subjects besides Law were included in
-the educational curriculum.</p>
-
-<p>‘Upon festival days,’ says Fortescue, who wrote in the seventeenth
-century, ‘after the offices of the Church are over, they employ
-themselves in the study of sacred and profane history; here everything
-which is good and virtuous is to be learned, all vice is discouraged and
-banished. So<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_016" id="page_016"></a>{16}</span> that knights, barons, and the greatest nobility of the
-kingdom often place their children in those Inns of Court, to form their
-manners, and to preserve them from the contagion of vice.’</p>
-
-<p>As time went on, in fact, the Inns of Court gradually changed their
-character, and became a kind of aristocratic University, where many of
-the leading men in politics and literature received a general training
-and education.</p>
-
-<p>And whilst Oxford and Cambridge, essentially more democratic, drew their
-students chiefly from the yeoman and artisan class, the Inns of Court
-became the fashionable colleges for young noblemen and gentlemen.</p>
-
-<p>Throughout the Renaissance, indeed, the Inns of Court men were the
-leaders of Society, and the Gentlemen of the Long Robe laid down the
-law, not only upon questions of politics, but upon points of taste, of
-dress, and of art.</p>
-
-<p>In the reign of Henry VI. the four Inns of Court contained each 200
-persons, and the ten Inns of Chancery 100 each. The expense of
-maintaining the students there was so great that ‘the sons of gentlemen
-do only study the Law in these hostels.’</p>
-
-<p>‘There is scarce an eminent lawyer who is not a gentleman by birth and
-fortune,’ says Fortescue;<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_017" id="page_017"></a>{17}</span> ‘consequently they have a greater regard for
-their character and honour.’</p>
-
-<p>And John Ferne, a student of the Inner Temple, wrote,<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a> in 1586,
-especially commending the wisdom of the regulation that none should be
-admitted to the Houses of Court except he were a gentleman of blood,
-since ‘nobleness of blood, joyned with virtue, compteth the person as
-most meet to the enterprizing of any publick service.’</p>
-
-<p>Shortly after the accession of James I., a royal mandate denied
-admission to a House of Court to anyone that was ‘not a gentleman by
-descent.’</p>
-
-<p>‘The younger sort,’ says Stow (1603), ‘are either gentlemen, or the sons
-of gentlemen, or of other most welthie persons.’</p>
-
-<p>It is one of the almost unvarying features of a Guild that a fixed
-period of apprenticeship must be served before admission to be a Master.
-The term of apprenticeship in the Inns of Court has varied with each
-Society, and in different epochs.</p>
-
-<p>In June, 1596, the period of probation which must be spent by a student
-in attending preliminary exercises in the Inns, before graduating in
-Law, was limited by an ordinance of the Judges and<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_018" id="page_018"></a>{18}</span> Benchers to seven
-years. Before that date the ‘exercises’ necessary for ‘a call to the
-Bar’ occupied eight years, during which twelve grand moots must be
-attended in one of the Inns of Chancery, and twenty petty moots in term
-time before the Readers of one of the greater Societies.</p>
-
-<p>But in 1617, in a ‘Parliament’ of the Benchers of the Inner Temple, it
-was ordained that ‘no man shall be called to the Bar before he has been
-full eight years of the House.’ Nor was lapse of time to be considered
-sufficient without proportionate acquisition of learning. Only ‘painful
-and sufficient students’ were to be called, who had ‘frequented and
-argued grand and petty moots in the Inns of Chancery, and brought in
-moots and argued clerks’ common cases within this House.’ A proviso
-against outside influence was added by the injunction that ‘anyone who
-procured letters from any great person to the Treasurer or Benchers in
-order to be called to the Bar, should forever be disqualified from
-receiving that degree within that House.’</p>
-
-<p>In the seventeenth century, however, ‘readings’ and ‘mootings’ alike
-fell into desuetude, and official instruction practically disappeared.
-The Inns became merely formal institutions, residence<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_019" id="page_019"></a>{19}</span> within the walls
-of which, indicated by the eating of dinners, was alone necessary for
-admittance to the Bar. The loss of the Law was the gain of Letters. A
-new class of students, educated in literature and politics, and highly
-born, were bred up to take their place in the direction of affairs and
-the criticism of writers.</p>
-
-<p>‘When the “readings” with their odds and ends of law-French and Latin
-went out into the darkness of oblivion, polite literature stepped into
-their place. “Wood’s Institutes” and “Finch’s Law” shared a divided
-reign with Beaumont and Fletcher, Butler and Dryden, Congreve and Aphra
-Behn. The “pert Templar” became a critic of <i>belles lettres</i>, and
-foremost among the wits, whereas his predecessors had been simply
-regarded by the outer world as a race that knew or cared for little else
-save black-letter tomes and musty precedents. Polite literature
-ultimately came to clothe the very forms of law with an elegance of
-diction not dreamed of in the philosophy of the older jurists, and thus
-deprived an arduous study of one of its most repellent features.’<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a></p>
-
-<p>Another cause which greatly contributed to the brilliant record of the
-Inns as homes of Literature<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_020" id="page_020"></a>{20}</span> and the Drama, as well as of the Law, was
-the rule which, up till quite a few years ago, compelled Irish
-Law-students to keep a certain number of terms in London prior to ‘call’
-at the King’s Inn, Dublin. Daniel O’Connell, at Lincoln’s Inn, Curran,
-Flood, Grattan, the orators; Tom Moore, the poet, and Richard Brinsley
-Sheridan, the dramatist, at the Temple, are among the later ‘Wild
-Irishmen’ who owed something to the London Inns in accordance with this
-rule, and rewarded the Metropolis with their eloquence and wit.</p>
-
-<p>In modern times the need of general regulations as to qualification by
-the keeping of terms and of examinations as a guarantee of competency
-has been recognized.</p>
-
-<p>After over 200 years of survival as an obsolete office, Readerships have
-been revived again to perform their proper functions. ‘A council of
-eight Benchers, representing all the Inns of Court, was appointed to
-frame lectures “open to the members of each society,” and five
-Readerships were established in several branches of legal science
-(1852). Attendance at these lectures was made compulsory, unless the
-candidate preferred submitting to an examination in Roman and English
-Law and Constitutional History. Three years<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_021" id="page_021"></a>{21}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_003" id="ill_003"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 342px;">
-<a href="images/ill_004_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_004_sml.jpg" width="342" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">INTERIOR OF THE MIDDLE TEMPLE HALL</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">The</span> date of its erection (1570) is in the stained-glass window on the
-right. In this Hall Queen Elizabeth may have danced with Sir Christopher
-Hatton, and here Shakespeare’s ‘Twelfth Night’ was first performed (see
-<a href="#page_075">pp. 75-78</a>).</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">later, a Royal Commission advised the establishment of a preliminary and
-final examination for all Bar students, together with the formation of a
-Law University with power to confer degrees in Law. The suggestions of
-the Commission were only partially acted upon, and then not till 1870,
-when Lord Chancellor Westbury succeeded in getting a preliminary
-examination in Latin and English subjects adopted and the final
-examination made obligatory.’<a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a></p>
-
-<p>And it is pleasant to note, too, that about the same time (1875) the
-custom of the ancient mootings, so useful for promoting ready address
-and sound knowledge of the Law among the aspirants to the Bar, was
-revived at Gray’s Inn.</p>
-
-<p>The discipline which the Inns of Court enforced upon their students
-corresponded in general to that exercised by an Oxford or Cambridge
-College.</p>
-
-<p>Fines and ‘putting out of Commons’ were the usual forms of punishment,
-though the power of imprisoning ‘gentlemen of the House’ for wilful
-misdemeanour and disobedience ‘was sometimes exercised by the Masters of
-the Bench.’<a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a></p>
-
-<p>Attendance at Divine Service was insisted upon,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_022" id="page_022"></a>{22}</span> and the wearing of long
-beards forbidden. A beard of over three weeks’ growth was subject to a
-fine of 20s. A student’s gown and a round cap must be worn in Hall and
-in Church, and gentlemen of these Societies were forbidden to go into
-the City in boots and spurs, or into Hall with any weapon except
-daggers. They were forbidden to keep Hawkes, or to ill-treat the
-Butlers. They were not allowed to play shove-groat. In the reign of
-Elizabeth, by an order of the Judges for all the Inns of Court, the
-wearing of a sword or buckler, of a beard above a fortnight’s growth, or
-of great hose, great ruffs, any silk or fur, was equally forbidden, and
-no Fellow of these Societies was allowed to go into the City or suburbs
-‘otherwise than in his gown according to the ancient usage of the
-gentlemen of the Inns of Court,’ upon penalty of expulsion for the third
-transgression. The wearing of gowns of a sad colour was enjoined by
-Philip and Mary, and long hair, or curled, was forbidden as surely as
-white doublets and velvet. These are echoes of the ordinary sumptuary
-laws of the period.</p>
-
-<p>‘There is both in the Inns of Court and the Inns of Chancery,’ says
-Fortescue, ‘a sort of an Academy or Gymnasium fit for persons of their
-station, where<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_023" id="page_023"></a>{23}</span> they learn singing and all kinds of music, dancing and
-Revels.’ These forms of recreation constituted, indeed, the lighter side
-of the educational and social life of the Inns.</p>
-
-<p>All-Hallowe’en, Candlemas, and Ascension Day, were the grand days for
-‘dancing, revelling, and musick,’ when, before the Judges and Benchers
-seated at the upper end of the Hall, the Utter Barristers and Inner
-Barristers performed ‘a solemn revel,’ which was followed by a
-post-revel, when ‘some of the Gentlemen of the Inner-Barr do present the
-House with dancing.’<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a> On occasions of more particular festivity, even
-so great dignitaries as the Lord-Chancellor, the Justices, Serjeants,
-and Benchers, would dance round the coal fire which blazed beneath the
-louvre in the centre of the Hall, whilst the verses of the Song of the
-House rang out in rousing chorus, like the song of the Mallard of All
-Souls, at Oxford.</p>
-
-<p>Dugdale gives the order of the Christmas ceremonies in delightful
-detail: ‘At night, before supper, are revels and dancing, and so also
-after supper, during the twelve daies of Christmas. The antientest
-Master of the Revels is after dinner and supper to sing a carol or song,
-and command other<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_024" id="page_024"></a>{24}</span> gentlemen then there present to sing with him and the
-company.’ On Christmas Day ‘Service in the Church ended, the gentlemen
-presently repair into the Hall, to breakfast with Brawn, Mustard and
-Malmsey,’ and so forth. The good-fellowship and the long evenings of
-Christmastide had natural issue in the production of plays and masques
-in these Halls, by students who have always been in close touch with the
-drama. It is not surprising, therefore, that one of Shakespeare’s plays
-was written for Twelfth Night, and first produced by the students of
-Law, at the Temple, for this merry and convivial season (see <a href="#CHAPTER_IV">Chapter
-IV</a>.).</p>
-
-<p>On St. Stephen’s Day the Lord of Misrule was abroad, and at dinner and
-afterwards games and pageants were performed about the fire that burned
-in the centre of the Hall, and whence the smoke escaped through the open
-chimney in the roof. For instance: ‘Then cometh in the Master of the
-Game apparelled in green velvet, and the Ranger of the Forest also, in a
-green suit of satten, bearing in his hand a green bow and divers arrows,
-with either of them a hunting horn about their necks; blowing together
-three blasts of Venery, they pace round about the fire three times.’
-They make obeisance to the Lord Chancellor, and then ‘a<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_025" id="page_025"></a>{25}</span> Huntsman cometh
-into the Hall, with a Fox and a Purse-net, with a Cat, both bound at the
-end of a staff, and with them nine or ten couple of Hounds. And the Fox
-and Cat are by the Hounds set upon, and killed beneath the fire’
-(Dugdale).</p>
-
-<p>The Post Revels, we are told, were ‘performed by the better sort of the
-young gentlemen of the Societies, with Galliards, Corrantoes, or else
-with Stage-plays.’ Masques were frequently performed by the members of
-the Inns, and Sir Christopher Hatton first obtained Queen Elizabeth’s
-favour by his appearance in a masque prepared by the lawyers.</p>
-
-<p>Besides the solemnities of Christmas and Readers’ Feasts, the <i>Antique
-Masques and Revelries</i>, as Wynne in his ‘Eunomus’ observes (ii., p.
-253), ‘introduced upon extraordinary occasions, as to the grandeur of
-the preparations, the dignity of the performers and of the spectators,
-at which our Kings and Queens have condescended to be so often present,
-seem to have exceeded every public exhibition of the kind.’</p>
-
-<p>One famous masque was presented by the four Inns of Court to Charles I.
-and Henrietta (1633), which cost some £24,000. So pleased were the King
-and Queen with ‘the noble bravery of it,’ and the answer implied in it
-to Prynne’s ‘Histrio Mastix,’<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_026" id="page_026"></a>{26}</span> that they returned the compliment by
-inviting 120 gentlemen of the Inns of Court to the masque at Whitehall
-on Shrove Tuesday.</p>
-
-<p>If these and other old customs have fallen into abeyance, the
-traditional spirit of sociability is far from being dead, and on ‘Grand
-Nights’ their old habit of hospitality is gratefully revived by the Inns
-of Court in favour of famous men, who are honoured as their guests.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_027" id="page_027"></a>{27}</span></p>
-
-<h2><a name="CHAPTER_II" id="CHAPTER_II"></a>CHAPTER II<br /><br />
-<small>THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS</small></h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">About</span> the year 1118 certain noblemen, horsemen, religiously bent, bound
-themselves by vow in the hands of the Patriarch of Jerusalem, ‘to serve
-Christ after the manner of Regular Canons in chastity and obedience, and
-to renounce their owne proper willes for ever.’</p>
-
-<p>The Order was founded by a Burgundian Knight who had mightily
-distinguished himself at the capture of Jerusalem. Hugh de Paganis was
-his name. Only seven of his comrades joined the Brotherhood at first.</p>
-
-<p>Their first profession was to safeguard pilgrims on their way to visit
-the Holy Sepulchre, and to keep the highways safe from thieves. A rule
-and a white habit were granted to this pilgrims’ police by Pope Honorius
-II. Crosses of red cloth were afterwards added to their white upper
-garments, and earned them the familiar title of the Red-Cross<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_028" id="page_028"></a>{28}</span> Knights.
-And for their first banner they adopted the Beaucéant, the upper part of
-which was black, signifying, it is said, death to their enemies; the
-lower part white, symbolizing love for their friends.</p>
-
-<p>Their services were rewarded and their efforts encouraged by Baldwin,
-King of Jerusalem, who granted them quarters in his palace, within the
-sacred enclosure of the Temple on Mount Moriah.</p>
-
-<p>Hence they came to be known as the Knights of the Temple, or Knights
-Templars. For Baldwin’s Palace was formed partly of a building erected
-by the Emperor Justinian, partly of a mosque built by the Caliph Omar,
-upon the site of Solomon’s Temple.</p>
-
-<p>The Order increased rapidly in popularity. It spread over Europe and the
-East, accumulating property and privileges. It was most highly
-organized, and at its head was a Grand Master, who resided at first in
-Jerusalem. A visit paid by the Founder, Paganis, to Henry I. in Normandy
-led to the establishment of settlements in England. Cambridge,
-Canterbury, Warwick, and Dover are mentioned amongst others by Stow.
-Temples, ‘built after the form of the Temple near to the Sepulchre at
-Jerusalem,’ were erected in many of the chief towns<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_029" id="page_029"></a>{29}</span> in England. And
-this circular shape of church, modelled upon the Holy Sepulchre in
-accordance with a prevailing love of imitating the holy places at
-Jerusalem, as, for instance, the Stations of the Cross, was the design
-adopted for the Templars’ London Churches. The date of their first
-settlement in London is not certain, but about the middle of the twelfth
-century they are said to have established themselves in Chancery Lane,
-between Southampton Buildings and Holborn Bars. Their property, which
-was afterwards to be known as the Old Temple, embraced part of the site
-of what is now Lincoln’s Inn. The foundations of a round church were
-discovered in 1595 near the site of the present Southampton Buildings.</p>
-
-<p>But it was not long before they moved to a pleasanter site, to the ‘most
-elegant spot in the Metropolis,’ as Charles Lamb declared. For, about
-the year 1180, the Templars acquired a large meadow sloping down to the
-broad River Thames, on the south side of Fleet Street, and stretching
-from Whitefriars on the east to Essex Street on the west. Here they
-built themselves a lordly dwelling-place and a splendid Church, again a
-round Church upon the same sacred model, part of which still stands.
-Across the way lay their<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_030" id="page_030"></a>{30}</span> recreation ground. For the site of the modern
-Law Courts&mdash;that Gothic pile which we can never wholly see, and in which
-Street just failed to design a truly complete, effective, and absolute
-building, and failed entirely to produce a building practically suited
-for its purpose&mdash;was known then as Fitchett’s Field. The scene of the
-labours of the Lawyers, who have succeeded to their inheritance, was
-once the tilting-ground of the Knights Templars.</p>
-
-<p>Five years later, in 1185, in the presence of Henry II. and all his
-Court, the dedication of the Round Church of the ‘New Temple’ took
-place. The ceremony was performed by Heraclius, Patriarch of Jerusalem.</p>
-
-<p>The surroundings of the ‘New Temple,’ when Henry graced it upon this
-occasion with his royal presence, were extraordinarily different even
-from the aspect they wore a century later.</p>
-
-<p>Fleet Street itself was not yet in existence. Its neighbourhood was a
-mere marsh, and Fleet Ditch, at the bottom of Ludgate Hill, was spanned
-by no bridge. The two highways to the City, when the Templars first
-settled at this spot, were first and foremost the River, and, secondly,
-by land, the old Roman Way through Newgate, up Holborn Hill<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_031" id="page_031"></a>{31}</span> to Holborn
-Bars, striking southwards from St. Mary-le-Strand, past the Roman Bath,
-to the River. But seventy years later a new main route to the City was
-constructed, which passed by the boundary of the Templars’ plot. For the
-marshes were drained, a bridge was thrown across the Fleet, and the
-‘Street of Fleetbrigge’ came into existence.</p>
-
-<p>The grandeur of the ceremony of dedication and the splendour of the
-Templars’ Church itself indicate clearly enough the importance of the
-‘New Temple’ as the headquarters of the Order in England, and also the
-waxing wealth and power of the Order itself.</p>
-
-<p>For these ‘fellow-soldiers of Christ,’ as they termed themselves, ‘poor
-and of the Temple of Solomon,’ had bound themselves to a vow of poverty,
-but they soon changed their allegiance to Mammon. The heraldic sign of
-the Winged Horse, which is now the well-known badge of the Inner Temple,
-and meets the eye at every turn as we pass through the narrow lanes and
-devious courts of which their property is composed, recalls and typifies
-the changing purposes of the ancient Templars and their successors. For
-the old crest of the Templars was a horse carrying two men, which
-probably was intended to suggest their profession<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_032" id="page_032"></a>{32}</span> of helping Christian
-pilgrims upon their road, but in which some saw an emblem of humiliation
-and of a vow to poverty so strict that they could afford but one horse
-for two knights. Whatever its significance, the badge was changed with
-changing circumstances. The two riders were converted into two wings,
-and the horse transformed into a Pegasus&mdash;Pegasus argent on a field
-azure&mdash;upon the occasion of some Christmas Revels and pageantry held at
-the Inner Temple in honour of Lord Robert Dudley, 1563, when it appears
-that this emblem, typical of the soaring ambitions of the new Society,
-was adopted by that Inn. The Middle Temple appropriated another badge,
-which the Templars had assumed in the thirteenth century. This was the
-sign of the <i>Agnus Dei</i>, the Holy Lamb, with the banner and nimbus,
-which figures so prominently upon the buildings of this Inn. These
-heraldic signs of Winged Horse and Holy Lamb should be encouraging to
-the young litigant, who, in his first experience of the Law, may be led
-to expect ‘justice without guile and law without delay’ from these legal
-fraternities, supposing that, in the words of the witty skit,</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘The Lamb sets forth their innocence,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">The Horse their expedition.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_033" id="page_033"></a>{33}</span></p>
-
-<p>The Order of Templars followed the almost invariable practice of such
-Institutions in accumulating treasure at the expense of the devout, and
-they succeeded more strikingly than most. By the beginning of the
-fourteenth century they had long abandoned all pretence to the
-performance of their original duties, but had at least earned the
-reputation of being exceedingly wealthy. The Treasury, indeed, of these
-devotees of Poverty was a prominent feature of their House, and they
-seem to have acted as Bankers, to whom the charge of money and jewels
-was entrusted in those troublous times.</p>
-
-<p>Here King John stored his Royal Treasury; here he often lodged, seeking
-refuge from his Barons; and here he passed the night before he signed
-the Great Charter at Runnymede. Henry III. followed his example in
-endowing the Temple with manors and privileges, whilst from his
-guardian, Hubert de Burgh, Earl of Kent, whom he had imprisoned in the
-Tower, he extracted all the Treasure that careful nobleman had committed
-to the custody of the Master of the Temple.</p>
-
-<p>Hither came King Edward I., and under pretence of seeing his mother’s
-jewels there laid up, this royal burglar broke open the coffers of
-certain<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_034" id="page_034"></a>{34}</span> persons who had likewise lodged their money here, and took away
-to the value of a thousand pounds.</p>
-
-<p>Of the Templars’ Treasure House nothing now remains, but the Treasurer
-survives, one of the chief officials of the Inn, whose duties correspond
-roughly to those of a Bursar of an Oxford College.</p>
-
-<p>The laying up of treasure upon earth is always apt to provoke the
-predatory instinct, even in the breast of a Chancellor of the Exchequer,
-and to the motive of greed was added, in the case of the Templars, the
-unanswerable charge that they had done nothing for many years to redeem
-their vows to succour Jerusalem or protect pilgrims. They were also
-accused, not without reason, of indulging in odious vices, and of being
-a masonic society devoted to the propagation of some heresy. The rival
-fraternity of military Knights, the Order of St. John, who had settled
-themselves in the rural seclusion of Clerkenwell, envied them. The Pope
-himself turned against them. Philip le Bel, who seems to have been the
-leading spirit in a general attack, dealt cruelly with the Order in
-France, causing the chief Members of it to be put to death. In England
-Edward II. contented himself with confiscating their possessions. The
-Order was abolished (1312), and, by decree of the Pope,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_035" id="page_035"></a>{35}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_004" id="ill_004"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;">
-<a href="images/ill_005_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_005_sml.jpg" width="500" height="368" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">LAMB BUILDING FROM PUMP COURT, TEMPLE</p>
-
-<p class="nind">A <span class="smcap">GLIMPSE</span> of the Temple Church appears on the left.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">confirmed by the Council of Vienne, all their property was granted to
-the Knights Hospitallers, the rival Order of St. John of Jerusalem.
-Edward, however, at first ignored their claims. He granted that part of
-the Templars’ domain which was not within the City boundaries, and which
-is now represented by the Outer Temple, to Walter de Stapleton, Bishop
-of Exeter. It was thenceforth known indifferently as Stapleton Inn,
-Exeter Inn, or the Outer Temple. It passed by purchase to Robert
-Devereux, Earl of Essex. Essex House was then erected, which, with its
-gardens, covered the site now occupied by Essex Court, Devereux Court,
-and Essex Street, and the buildings that abut upon the Strand.</p>
-
-<p>The Gate at the end of Essex Street, with the staircase to the water, is
-the only portion of the old building that survives. The Outer Temple was
-never occupied by any College or Society of Lawyers. But the history of
-the portion of the Templars’ property which lay within the liberties of
-the City, indicated by Temple Bar, was destined to be very different.
-This property was granted by Edward II. to Thomas, Earl of Lancaster. On
-his rebellion the estate reverted to the Crown, and was granted, in
-1322, to Aymer de Valence,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_036" id="page_036"></a>{36}</span> Earl of Pembroke. He died without issue, and
-Edward bestowed the property upon his new favourite, Hugh le Despencer,
-upon whose attainder it passed again to the Crown. At length the claim
-of the Knights Hospitallers was admitted. For in 1324 Edward II.
-assigned to them ‘all the lands of the Templars,’ except, of course,
-some nineteen-twentieths which King and Pope ‘touched’ in transference.
-The King finally made to them an absolute grant of the whole Temple,
-apart from the Outer Temple, in consideration of £100 contributed for
-the wars.</p>
-
-<p>What happened next it is impossible, owing to lack of documentary
-evidence, with certainty to say. This absence of evidence is partly due,
-no doubt, to the behaviour of Wat Tyler’s men in 1381, as quoted by
-Stow. For they not only sacked and burned John of Gaunt’s noble palace,
-the neighbouring Savoy, but also ‘destroyed and plucked down the houses
-and lodgings of the Temple, and took out of the Church the books and
-records that were in Hutches of the apprentices of the law, carried them
-into the streets and burnt them.’ And later records must have
-disappeared in other ways, notably in the fire of 1678. Be that as it
-may, the fact with which<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_037" id="page_037"></a>{37}</span> everybody is familiar is that the Temple
-property passed into the occupancy, and finally into the possession, of
-two Societies of Lawyers, who existed, and still exist, on terms of
-absolute equality, neither taking precedence of the other, and both
-sharing equally the Round Church of the Knights Templars. These two
-Societies or Inns are called after the property of the Knights within
-the boundaries of the City, which they divided between them&mdash;the Inner
-and the Middle Temple.</p>
-
-<p>Now, the first discoverable mention of the Temple as an abode of lawyers
-occurs in Chaucer’s ‘Prologue to the Canterbury Tales’ (<i>c.</i> 1387).
-Geoffrey Chaucer himself, a fond tradition would have us believe, dwelt
-for a while in these Courts, and was a student of the Inner Temple. Be
-that as it may, he tells us</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘A manciple there was of a Temple ...<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Of Masters had he mo than thrice ten,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">That were of Law expert and curious;<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Of which there was a dozen in that house<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Worthy to been Stewards of rent and land<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Of any Lord that is in England,’ etc.<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Here, then, we have a clear indication of a Society of Masters dwelling
-in the Temple, whilst<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_038" id="page_038"></a>{38}</span> Walsingham’s account of Wat Tyler’s rebellion
-refers to apprentices of the Law there. But there is nothing to indicate
-the existence of the two Inns till about the middle of the fifteenth
-century, when we find references to them in the Paston Letters (1440
-<i>ff.</i>), and in the Black Book of Lincoln’s Inn (1466 <i>ff.</i>). This does
-not, of course, prove that there was only one Inn before. Such, however,
-is the traditional account. ‘In spite of the damage done by the rebels
-under Wat Tyler,’ says Dugdale, ‘the number of students so increased
-that at length they divided themselves in two bodies&mdash;the Society of the
-Inner and the Society of the Middle Temple.’ Those who believe this
-maintain that when, in course of natural development&mdash;rapid expansion
-apparently following the rebels’ onslaught&mdash;the original Society had
-attained an unwieldy bulk and outgrown the capacity of the Old Hall, a
-split was made. Two distinct and divided Societies, upon a footing of
-absolute equality, took the place of the parent body. A new Hall was
-built, but equal rights in the Old Church and the contiguous property
-were maintained.</p>
-
-<p>This form of propagation by subdivision is common enough, of course, in
-the vegetable and insect world, but it seems highly improbable in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_039" id="page_039"></a>{39}</span>
-case of a learned body. It is to me an incredible dichotomy. And it is
-not necessary to stretch one’s credulity so far. There are
-indications&mdash;faint, it is true, but still indications&mdash;of the existence
-of two Societies of Lawyers settled here on two parcels of land that
-once belonged to the Knights Templars, and dating from almost the
-earliest days after Edward’s confiscation.</p>
-
-<p>For, according to Dugdale, who repeats a tradition which is probably
-correct, the Knights Hospitallers leased the property soon after they
-had acquired it to ‘divers apprentices of the Law that came from
-Thavie’s Inn in Holborn’ at an annual rental of £10. This must have been
-before 1348. For in that year died John Thavye, who bequeathed this Inn
-to his wife, and described it in his will as one ‘in which certain
-apprentices of the Law <i>used</i> to reside’ (<i>solebant</i>). But there is also
-evidence of another and earlier settlement of lawyers on this property.
-Some lawyers, it is recorded, ‘made a composition with the Earl of
-Lancaster for a lodging in the Temple, and so came thither and have
-continued ever since.’<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> The Earl of Lancaster, as we have seen above,
-held the Temple <i>c.</i> 1315-1322.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_040" id="page_040"></a>{40}</span></p>
-
-<p>Here, then, we have indications of two Societies of Lawyers settling in
-the Temple. The first body, holding from the Earl of Lancaster, may
-reasonably be supposed to have had their grant confirmed by the owners
-who succeeded him. The Society of the Middle Temple must be considered
-the successors of those tenants. And this Society Mr. Pitt Lewis,
-K.C.,<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a> has traced to a former home in St. George’s Inn, a students’
-hostel mentioned by Stow.</p>
-
-<p>The second body, migrating from Thavye’s Inn, obtained a lease of the
-part not occupied by the former, at an annual rental of £10, as Dugdale
-states. And from them are descended the Inner Templars of to-day.</p>
-
-<p>From the time when the Order of the Knights Hospitallers was dissolved,
-till 1608, these two Societies held these two separate parcels of land
-direct of the Crown by lease, paying two separate rents. Then they
-discovered that James I. was beginning to negotiate a sale of the
-freehold.</p>
-
-<p>The present of a ‘stately cup of pure gold, filled with gold pieces,’
-presented by the two Societies, converted the Scholar-Monarch. On August
-13, 1608, he granted a Charter to the Treasurers and<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_041" id="page_041"></a>{41}</span> Benchers of the
-Inner and Middle Temple, conferring upon them the freehold of the
-Temple, together with the Church, ‘for the hospitation and education of
-the Professors and Students of the Laws of this Realm,’ subject to a
-rent charge of £10, payable by each of the two Societies. In 1673 these
-rents were extinguished by purchase by the two Societies.</p>
-
-<p>This patent of James I. is the only existing formal document concerning
-the relations between the Crown and the Inns, though it would be strange
-indeed if no other grant or patent ever existed. It is preserved in the
-Church in a chest kept beneath the Communion Table, which can only be
-opened by the keys held by the two Treasurers. The importance of the
-patent is, for the purpose of our investigation, that it is based almost
-certainly upon documents that have disappeared, but which reached back
-to the original conveyance, and it shows that there were two separate
-parcels, exacting two separate rents. Moreover, it provided that <i>each</i>
-Society should continue to pay a rental of £10. Now, if these two
-Societies represented a division of the one parent body which had come
-from Thavye’s Inn and held the <i>whole</i> Inner and Middle Temple at a<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_042" id="page_042"></a>{42}</span>
-rent of £10, it is hardly conceivable that when this supposed division
-took place, each Society should have continued to pay the whole rent.
-The first thing they would have divided, after dividing themselves,
-would surely have been that rent of £10.<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a></p>
-
-<p>That the theory of a division having taken place early caused much
-wonderment is shown by a report that was rife in the seventeenth
-century. This ‘report’ was to the effect that the division arose from
-the sides taken by the Lawyers in the Wars of the Roses. Those wars,
-however, took place after the date when there is evidence of the
-existence of the two Societies. The ‘report’ represents an attempt to
-explain the existence of the two Societies when their origin was already
-forgotten, and was perhaps suggested by the fact that it was in the
-Temple Gardens that Shakespeare placed the famous incident that led to
-the Wars of the Roses:</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza1">
-<span class="i2">‘<span class="smcap">Plantagenet.</span> Let him that is a true-born gentleman,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">And stands upon the honour of his birth,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">If he suppose that I have pleaded truth,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">From off this briar pluck a white rose with me.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_043" id="page_043"></a>{43}</span><br /></span>
-</div><div class="stanza1">
-<span class="i2">‘<span class="smcap">Somerset.</span> Let him that is no coward, nor no flatterer,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">But dare maintain the party of the truth,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">Pluck a red rose from off this thorn with me.<br /></span>
-</div><div class="stanza1">
-<span class="i2">‘<span class="smcap">Warwick.</span> This brawl to-day,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">Grown to this faction in the Temple Garden,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">Shall send, between the red rose and the white,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">A thousand souls to death and deadly night.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>In 1732, in order to put an end to many questions of property, an
-elaborate deed of partition was agreed to by the two Inns, and forms the
-final authority upon what belongs to each.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_044" id="page_044"></a>{44}</span></p>
-
-<h2><a name="CHAPTER_III" id="CHAPTER_III"></a>CHAPTER III<br /><br />
-<small>THE TEMPLE CHURCH</small></h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">It</span> is natural to turn from this story of the Templars to the Round
-Church in the Temple, which is their chief memorial. We leave the roar
-and rattle of Fleet Street, and pass through the low Gateway of the
-Inner Temple into the narrow lane which leads us between the gross
-modern buildings, called after Oliver Goldsmith and Dr. Johnson, to the
-west end of the Church&mdash;the west end, which is formed by the round
-building which we have already mentioned.</p>
-
-<p>The Gate-House beneath which we have passed is in itself a building of
-no ordinary interest. It is, as we now see it, a modern (1905) version
-of an old timber and rough-cast house, with projecting upper stories,
-pleasantly contrasting with the Palladian splendour of the adjoining
-Bank. It was built ‘over and beside the gateway and the lane’ in 1610 by
-one John Bennett, and was perhaps designed<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_045" id="page_045"></a>{45}</span> by Inigo Jones. The room on
-the first floor was, there is every reason to suppose, used by the
-Prince of Wales as his Council Chamber for the Duchy of Cornwall. It
-contains some fine Jacobean and Georgian panelling, an admirable
-eighteenth-century staircase, and an elaborate and beautiful Jacobean
-plaster ceiling, with the initials, motto, and feathers of Prince Henry,
-who died 1612.</p>
-
-<p>This is No. 17, Fleet Street. No. 16, to the west of it, with the sign
-of the Pope’s Head, was the shop of Bernard Lintot, who published Pope’s
-‘Homer,’ and later of Jacob Robinson, the bookseller and publisher, with
-whom Edmund Burke lodged when ‘eating his dinners’ as a student of the
-Middle Temple.</p>
-
-<p>The Gate-House escaped the Fire of London, and, having been restored, is
-now preserved to the public use by the London County Council.<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> It
-forms an appropriate introduction to those narrow lanes and quiet Courts
-and that lovely Church, whose pavements once resounded with the tread of
-the mail-clad champions of Christendom, and echo now with the softer
-footfall of bewigged, begowned<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_046" id="page_046"></a>{46}</span> Limbs of the Law. Dull and prosaic must
-he be indeed who cannot here feel the thrill of imagination which
-stirred the soul of Tom Pinch as he wandered through these Courts:</p>
-
-<p>‘Every echo of his footsteps sounded to him like a sound from the old
-walls and pavements, wanting language to relate the histories of the
-dim, dismal rooms; to tell him what lost documents were decaying in
-forgotten corners of the shut-up cellars, from whose lattices such
-mouldy sighs came breathing forth as he went past; to whisper of dark
-bins of rare old wine, bricked up in vaults among the old foundations of
-the Halls; or mutter in a lower tone yet darker legends of the
-cross-legged knights, whose marble effigies were in the Church’ (‘Martin
-Chuzzlewit’).</p>
-
-<p>The Round part of the Church of the Knights Templars, which we now see
-lying below us, is one of the very few instances of Norman work left in
-London&mdash;the only instance, save the superb fragments of St.
-Bartholomew’s Church and the splendid whole of the Tower of London. It
-was dedicated, as we have seen, in 1185 to St. Mary by Heraclius,
-Patriarch of Jerusalem. This fact was recorded on a stone over the door,
-engraved in the time of Elizabeth, and said by Stow to be an<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_047" id="page_047"></a>{47}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_005" id="ill_005"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 339px;">
-<a href="images/ill_006_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_006_sml.jpg" width="339" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">INTERIOR OF THE TEMPLE CHURCH</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">A Round Church</span> of the Order of Knights Templars (dedicated in 1185). The
-oblong nave is seen through the pillars of polished Purbeck marble
-(1240).</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">accurate copy of an older one. It also proclaimed an Indulgence of sixty
-days to annual visitors, the earliest known example, I believe, of this
-particular form of taxation. The Church was again dedicated in 1240. The
-rectangular portion of the Church, the Eastern portion added to the
-Western Round, was now probably reconstructed, supplanting a former
-chancel or choir, just at the period when the new Pointed style had
-ousted the round Norman.</p>
-
-<p>The circular type of church is not peculiar to the Order of Templars, as
-we have seen, or even to the Christians, but the choice of it was due in
-this case to the practice of imitating the architecture, as the
-topography, of the Holy Places at Jerusalem. In England, Round Churches
-occur at Ludlow and Cambridge (1101), built before the Knights of the
-Temple were established. St. Sepulchre at Northampton is possibly a
-Templar Church, but the Round Church at Little Maplestead in Essex
-belongs to the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and was built by the
-Knights Hospitallers.</p>
-
-<p>The Temple Church escaped the Fire of London as by a miracle, for the
-flames came as near as the Master’s House at the East End. It escaped
-the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_048" id="page_048"></a>{48}</span> fire of 1678, when the old Chapel<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> of St. Anne, once perhaps the
-scene of the initiation of the Knights Templars, lying at the junction
-of Round and Rectangle, was destroyed by gunpowder to save the church.
-But it could not escape the destroying hands of the nineteenth-century
-Goths. For here, between 1824 and 1840, the great Gothic Revivalists
-indulged in one of their most ineffable and ineffaceable triumphs of
-intemperate enthusiasm. The Round part of the Church was almost rebuilt,
-and the old carvings were supplanted by inferior modern work. The
-conical roof was added; the horrid battlements banished. The old marble
-columns were removed and replaced by new ones, to obtain which the old
-Purbeck quarries were reopened. This marble<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_049" id="page_049"></a>{49}</span> takes an extraordinarily
-high polish, and presents a surface so clean and lustrous as to be
-almost shocking in its contrast to our dingy London atmosphere, and
-buildings begrimed with dirt and soot.</p>
-
-<p>The many brasses, which Camden praised, have disappeared; the rich
-collection of tablets and monuments and inscribed gravestones that once
-pleased the eye of Pepys, and formed a feast of heraldic ornament, has
-been dispersed, and found sanctuary in the tiny Churchyard without, on
-the north side of the Church, or in the Triforium. The floor of the
-Church was, at the same time, wisely lowered to its original level, and
-covered with a pavement of tiles designed after the pattern of the
-remains of old ones found there, or in the Chapter House of Westminster.</p>
-
-<p>A continuous stone bench, or sedile, which runs round the base of the
-walls was added at this period, together with the delightful arcade
-above it, with grotesque and other heads in the spandrels. The wheel
-window&mdash;a lovely thing&mdash;was uncovered and filled with stained glass, and
-the windows in the circular aisle of the Round have since been filled by
-Mr. Charles Winston with stained glass which is good, but the colour of
-which it is absurd to compare, as Mr. Baylis does, with the blues and<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_050" id="page_050"></a>{50}</span>
-rubies of the glass of the best period. It is to be hoped that the
-remaining windows will not be filled with coloured glass, as Mr.
-Baylis<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> suggests, for the interior of the Round is too dark already.</p>
-
-<p>The result of all this Gothic reconstruction is that, save for the old
-rough stones in the exterior Round walls, and some of the ornate
-semicircular arches, the Templars’ Church exists no more. The grandeur,
-beauty, and historical interest of their building can be gathered now
-from old engravings only; the monuments of many famous men, in judicial
-robes and with shields rich in heraldry, a representative gallery of
-unbroken centuries, which once crowded its floors, must be judged by
-broken and scattered fragments. What we have is a reconstruction such as
-the Restorers chose to give us&mdash;that is, a light and very pleasing Early
-English interior, fitted into a Round Norman exterior, beneath the
-remaining arcade of round arches and windows.<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a></p>
-
-<p>If the enthusiasm of the Restorers, however, led them to destroy so that
-we can never forgive them for having taken from us original work for the
-sake of indulging their own fancy, yet it is evident<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_051" id="page_051"></a>{51}</span> that there was
-much for them legitimately to undo. There were plaster and stucco, and
-dividing gallery and whitewashed ceiling, and all the usual horrors of
-the eighteenth century, to be got rid of. The graves and monuments were
-historically interesting, but they crowded the little church unbearably.
-And at least the Restorers have given us beautiful work of their own,
-and a seemly and beautiful sanctuary worthy of the place.</p>
-
-<p>The Round is entered by a western door&mdash;a massive oaken door superbly
-hung upon enormous hinges, quite modern. It closes beneath a
-semicircular arch enriched by deeply-recessed columns with foliated
-capitals of the transitional Norman style, though all this work, like
-the Gothic Porch which contains it, is modern restoration. The scene as
-we enter the Church is one of striking singularity. Near at hand is the
-arcaded sedile about the walls of the Round, and through six clustered
-columns of great elegance, made of polished Purbeck marble, which
-support the dome, we catch a glimpse of the polished marble columns in
-the Choir, the lancet windows in the North and South walls, and the
-three stained windows of the East End, beneath which the gilded Reredos
-glitters. And through the painted windows of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_052" id="page_052"></a>{52}</span> Round itself the light
-strikes upon a wonderful series of monumental recumbent figures, some of
-which are made of this flashing Purbeck marble too. It is a strange,
-unforgettable sight, that summons up unbidden the vision of the
-Red-Cross Knights, to the tread of whose mailed feet these pavements
-rang, when, beneath their baucéant banners, they gathered here to the
-Dedication of their Temple.</p>
-
-<p>These monuments, though re-arranged and restored indeed by Richardson,
-1840, are still of great interest. Nine only out of eleven formerly
-mentioned remain. Two groups of four each lie beneath the Dome, with the
-ninth close by the South wall, balancing a stone coffin near the North.
-Two of them belong to the twelfth century and seven to the thirteenth,
-and these silent figures wear the armour of that period&mdash;the chain mail
-and long surcoats, the early goad spurs, the long shields and swords,
-the belts, and mufflers of mail.</p>
-
-<p>The Monuments in the Temple Church have been frequently described, by
-Stow and Weever, for instance, by Dugdale,<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> and by Gough.<a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a> The
-tradition that they represent ‘ancient British<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_053" id="page_053"></a>{53}</span> Kings,’ or even
-necessarily Templars, has been long exploded. The theory that every
-figure whose legs are crossed in effigy belonged to that Order has been
-consigned to the limbo of vulgar errors. But five of these effigies are
-mentioned by Stow as being of armed Knights ‘lying cross-legged as men
-vowed to the Holy Land, against the infidels and unbelieving Jews.’ And
-it is very probable that cross-legs did indicate those who had either
-undertaken a Crusade or vowed themselves to the Holy Land. At any rate,
-I know no evidence to show that this was <i>not</i> the symbolism by which
-the medieval mason in England and Ireland chose to indicate the
-Crusader.</p>
-
-<p>None of these remarkable monuments can with certainty be identified. Of
-those now grouped upon the South side Stow says: ‘The first of the
-crosse-legged was W. Marshall, the elder Earl of Pembroke, who died
-1219; Wil. Marshall, his son, the second, and Gilbert Marshall, his
-brother, also Earl of Pembroke, slayne in a tournament at Hertford,
-besides Ware,’ in 1241. And this may or may not be so. The fourth is
-nameless; the fifth, near the wall, is possibly that of Sir Robert
-Rosse, who, according to Stow, was buried here.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_054" id="page_054"></a>{54}</span></p>
-
-<p>Of the group upon the North side, only that of the cross-legged knight
-in a coat of mail and a round helmet flattened on top, whose head rests
-on a cushion, and whose long, pointed shield is charged with an
-escarbuncle on a diapered field, can with any probability be named. For
-these are the arms of Mandeville (<i>de Magnavilla</i>)&mdash;‘quarterly, or and
-gules, an escarbuncle, sable’&mdash;and this monument of Sussex marble gives
-us the first example of arms upon a sepulchral figure in England.<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> It
-is supposed to be the effigy of Geoffrey Mandeville, whom Stephen made
-first Earl of Essex, and Matilda Constable of the Tower. A ferocious and
-turbulent knight, he received an arrow-wound at last in an attack upon
-Burwell Castle, and was carried off by the Templars to die. But, as he
-died under sentence of excommunication, it is said that they hung his
-body in a lead coffin upon a tree in the Old Temple Orchard, until
-absolution had been obtained for him from the Pope. Then they brought
-him to the new Temple and buried him there (1182).</p>
-
-<p>The Choir, or rectangular part of the Church, of which the nave is
-broader than the aisles, but of <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_055" id="page_055"></a>{55}</span>the same height, is a beautiful example
-of the Early English style, and is lighted by five lancet triplet
-windows. By the Restorers the old panelling and the beautiful
-seventeenth-century Reredos were removed. Tiers of deplorable pews,
-deplorably arranged, and a very feeble Gothic Reredos<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> were
-substituted. The roof, supported by the Purbeck marble clustered columns
-that culminate in richly-moulded capitals, was painted with shields and
-mottoes in painstaking imitation of the thirteenth century. The windows
-at the East End were filled with very inferior modern stained glass,
-none of it of the least interest, poor in colour and wretchedly ignorant
-in design&mdash;ignorant, that is, of the rules which guided the art of the
-medieval glazier.</p>
-
-<p>A bust of the ‘Judicious’ Hooker, Master of the Temple Church, and
-author of the ‘Ecclesiastical Polity,’ the grave of Selden near the
-South-West corner of the Choir, and above it a mural tablet to his
-memory, are the monuments of known men most worthy of attention. The
-fine fourteenth-century sepulchral effigy near the double piscina of
-Purbeck marble is supposed to be that of Silvester de Everden, Bishop of
-Carlisle.</p>
-
-<p>The Organ, frequently reconstructed and finally renewed by Forster and
-Andrews, 1882, has been<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_056" id="page_056"></a>{56}</span> famous for generations. It was originally built
-by Bernard Schmidt. Dr. Blow and Purcell, his pupil, played upon it in
-competition with that built by Harris. The decision of this Battle of
-the Organs was referred to the famous, or infamous, Lord Chief Justice
-Jeffreys, who was a good musician, and in this matter, at least, seems
-to have proved himself a good Judge.</p>
-
-<p>The <i>Triforium</i><a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> is reached by a small Norman door in the North-West
-corner of the oblong. A winding staircase leads to the Penitential
-Cell&mdash;4 feet long, by 2 feet 6 inches wide&mdash;where many of the Knights
-were confined. To the Triforium many tablets and monuments (<i>e.g.</i>, of
-Plowden), once in the Church below, have been removed.</p>
-
-<p>Among the epitaphs in brass, quoted at length by Dugdale, is one in
-memory of John White:</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘Here lieth a John, a burning, shining light;<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">His name, life, actions, were all White.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>The Templars’ Church was equally divided between the two Societies of
-Lawyers from ‘East to West, the North Aisle to the Middle, the South<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_057" id="page_057"></a>{57}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_006" id="ill_006"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 347px;">
-<a href="images/ill_007_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_007_sml.jpg" width="347" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">THE EAST END OF THE TEMPLE CHURCH AND THE MASTER’S
-HOUSE</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">to the Inner Temple.’ This fact, with many others, clearly indicates the
-basis of perfect equality upon which the two Societies were agreed to
-stand, and on which, in spite of subsequent claims to precedence on the
-part of both, declared groundless by judicial authority, they will
-henceforth continue. As to the Round, it appears to have been used by
-both Societies in common, largely as a place of business, like the
-Parvis of St. Paul’s, where lawyers congregated, and contracts were
-concluded. Butler refers to this custom in his ‘Hudibras’:</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘Walk the Round with Knights o’ the Posts<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">About the cross-legged Knights, their hosts,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Or wait for customers between<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">The pillar rows in Lincoln’s Inn.’<br /></span>
-<span class="i12"><span class="smcap">Butler</span>: <i>Hudibras</i>.<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Joint property of the two Societies, also, is that exquisite example of
-Georgian domestic architecture, the Master’s House (1764). This perfect
-model of a Gentleman’s Town-House owes its great charm almost entirely
-to its beautiful proportions, and to the appropriate material of good
-red brick and stone of which it is built. It is a thousand pities that
-blue slates have been allowed to supplant the good red tiles that should
-form the roof. The House itself is the successor of one<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_058" id="page_058"></a>{58}</span> which was
-erected (1700) after the Great Fire.<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> The original Lodge is said to
-have been upon the site of the present Garden, directly in line with the
-east end of the Church. In the vaults beneath this Garden many Benchers
-of both Inns have been laid to rest.</p>
-
-<p>In this Lodge, then, dwells the Master of the Temple Church.</p>
-
-<p>‘There are certain buildings,’ says Camden, ‘on the east part of the
-Churchyard, in part whereof he hath his lodgings, and the rest he
-letteth out to students. His dyet he hath in either House, at the upper
-end of the Bencher’s Table, except in the time of reading, it then being
-the Reader’s place. Besides the Master, there is a Reader, who readeth
-Divine Service each morning and evening, for which he hath his salary
-from the Master.’</p>
-
-<p>A Custos of the Church had been appointed by the Knights Hospitallers,
-but after the Dissolution of the Monasteries the presentation of the
-office was reserved to the Crown. The Church is not within the Bishop’s
-jurisdiction. On appointment by the Crown, the Master is admitted
-forthwith without any institution or induction. But the Master of the
-Temple Church is Master of nothing<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_059" id="page_059"></a>{59}</span> else. When, in the reign of James
-I., Dr. Micklethwaite laid claim to wider authority, the Benchers of
-both Temples succeeded in proving to the Attorney-General that his
-jurisdiction was confined to his Church.</p>
-
-<p>Masters of real eminence have been few. By far the greatest was the
-learned Dr. John Hooker, appointed by Elizabeth, who resigned in 1591.
-Dr. John Gauden, who claimed to have written the ‘Eikon Basilike,’ was
-Master of the Temple before he became Bishop of Exeter and Worcester.
-And in our own day Canon Ainger added to the charm of a singularly
-attractive personality the accomplishments of a scholar who devoted much
-of his time to the works of another devout lover of the Temple&mdash;Charles
-Lamb.</p>
-
-<p>The Church was once connected with the Old Hall by Cloisters,
-communicating with the Chapel of St. Thomas that once stood outside the
-north door of it, and with the Refectory of the Priests, a room with
-groined arches and corbels at the west end of the present Inner Temple
-Hall, which still survives (see <a href="#page_048">p. 48</a>). Later on, Chambers were built
-over the Cloisters, and the Church itself was almost stifled by the
-shops and chambers that were allowed to cluster about it, along the
-South Wall,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_060" id="page_060"></a>{60}</span> and even over the Porch. Beneath the shelter of these
-Cloisters the Students of the Law were wont to walk, in order to ‘bolt’
-or discuss points of law, whilst ‘all sorts of witnesses Plied in the
-Temple under trees.’</p>
-
-<p>The Fire of 1678 burnt down the old Cloisters and other buildings at the
-south-west extremity of the Church. The present Cloisters at that angle,
-designed by Wren, were rebuilt in 1681, as a Tablet proudly proclaims.</p>
-
-<p>The Cloister Court is completed by Lamb Building, which, though
-apparently within the bounds of the Inner Temple, belongs (by purchase)
-to the Middle Temple, and is named from the badge of that Inn, the Agnus
-Dei, which figures over the characteristic entrance of this delightful
-Jacobean building, and has now given its title to the whole Court. Here
-lived that brilliant Oriental Scholar, Sir William Jones, sharing
-chambers with the eccentric author of ‘Sandford and Merton,’ Thomas Day.
-And it was to the attics of these buildings, where Pen and Warrington
-dwelt, that Major Pendennis groped his way through the fog, piloted, as
-he might be to-day, ‘by a civil personage with a badge and white apron
-through some dark alleys and under various<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_061" id="page_061"></a>{61}</span> melancholy archways into
-courts each more dismal than the other.’<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a></p>
-
-<p>The consecrated nature of their tenement resulted in certain
-inconveniences to the Lawyers. On the one hand, the Temple was a place
-of Sanctuary, and its character suffered accordingly. Debtors,
-criminals, and dissolute persons flocked to it as a refuge, so that it
-became necessary to issue orders of Council (1614) that the Inns should
-be searched for strangers at regular intervals, whilst, with the vain
-view of reserving the precincts for none but lawyers, it was ordained
-that ‘no gentleman foreigner or discontinuer’ should lodge therein, so
-that the Inns might not be converted into ‘taverns’ (<i>diversoria</i>). On
-the other hand, the benevolence of the Benchers was taxed by many
-unnatural or unfortunate parents, who used the Temple as a crèche, and
-left their babies at its doors. The records give many instances of
-payments made towards the support of such infants, who were frequently
-given the ‘place-name’ of Temple.</p>
-
-<p>I have quoted from Thackeray a phrase not so over-complimentary to the
-surroundings of Lamb Building.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_062" id="page_062"></a>{62}</span></p>
-
-<p>But now, before passing on to the story of the Halls of these renowned
-Societies, and the Chambers which have harboured so many famous men, I
-must quote, as an introduction, the passage in which the novelist makes
-amends, and nobly sums up the spirit of the life men lead there, and the
-atmosphere of strenuous work and literary tradition which lightens those
-‘dismal courts’ and ‘bricky towers.’</p>
-
-<p>‘Nevertheless, those venerable Inns which have the “Lamb and Flag” and
-the “Winged Horse” for their ensigns have attractions for persons who
-inhabit them, and a share of rough comforts and freedom, which men
-always remember with pleasure. I don’t know whether the student of law
-permits himself the refreshment of enthusiasm, or indulges in poetical
-reminiscences as he passes by historical chambers, and says, “Yonder
-Eldon lived; upon this site Coke mused upon Lyttelton; here Chitty
-toiled; here Barnwell and Alderson joined in their famous labours; here
-Byles composed his great work upon bills, and Smith compiled his
-immortal leading cases; here Gustavus still toils with Solomon to aid
-him.” But the man of letters can’t but love the place which has been
-inhabited by so many of his brethren or peopled by their<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_063" id="page_063"></a>{63}</span> creations, as
-real to us at this day as the authors whose children they were; and Sir
-Roger de Coverley walking in the Temple Gardens, and discoursing with
-Mr. Spectator about the beauties in hoops and patches who are sauntering
-over the grass, is just as lively a figure to me as old Samuel Johnson
-rolling through the fog with the Scotch Gentleman at his heels, on their
-way to Dr. Goldsmith’s chambers in Brick Court, or Harry Fielding, with
-inked ruffles and a wet towel round his head, dashing off articles at
-midnight for the <i>Covent Garden Journal</i>, while the printer’s boy is
-asleep in the passage.’<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_064" id="page_064"></a>{64}</span></p>
-
-<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV"></a>CHAPTER IV<br /><br />
-<small>THE MIDDLE TEMPLE</small></h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">The</span> passage I have quoted from Thackeray at the end of the last chapter
-shadows forth eloquently enough something of the feeling of respect and
-awe which the young barrister&mdash;and even those who are not young
-barristers&mdash;may naturally feel for the precincts within which the great
-English Lawyers lived and worked&mdash;the Inns of Court, where the splendid
-fabric of English Law was gradually built up, ‘not without dust and
-heat.’</p>
-
-<p>But for most laymen the Temple and its sister Inns have other and
-perhaps more obvious charms. For as we pass by unexpected avenues into
-‘the magnificent ample squares and classic green recesses’ of the
-Temple, they seem to be bathed in the rich afterglow of suns that have
-set, the light which never was on sea or land, shed by the glorious
-associations connected with some of the greatest names in English
-literature. Here, we remember, by fond tradition Geoffrey Chaucer is<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_065" id="page_065"></a>{65}</span>
-reputed to have lived. Here Oliver Goldsmith worked and died, and here
-his mortal remains were laid to rest. Here, within hail of his beloved
-Fleet Street, Dr. Johnson dwelt, and Blackstone wrote his famous
-‘Commentaries.’ Here the gentle Elia was born. Hither possibly came
-Shakespeare to superintend the production of ‘Twelfth Night.’ Here, in
-the Inner Temple Hall, was acted the first English tragedy, ‘Gorboduc;
-or Ferrex and Porrex,’ a bloodthirsty play, by Thomas Sackville, Lord
-High Treasurer of England, and Thomas Norton, both members of the Inner
-Temple. And hither, to witness these or other performances, came the
-Virgin Queen.</p>
-
-<p>The main entrance to the Middle Temple is the gateway from Fleet Street,
-scene of many a bonfire lit of yore by Inns of Court men on occasions of
-public rejoicing.<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> This characteristic building, of red brick and
-Portland stone, with a classical pediment, was designed by Sir
-Christopher Wren, and built, as an inscription records, in 1684. An old
-iron gas-lamp hangs above the arch, beneath the sign of the Middle
-Temple Lamb.</p>
-
-<p>Wren’s noble gate-house replaced a Tudor building, erected, according to
-tradition, by Sir Amias<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_066" id="page_066"></a>{66}</span> Paulet, who, being forbidden&mdash;so Cavendish<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a>
-tells the story&mdash;to leave London without license by Cardinal Wolsey,
-‘lodged in this Gate-house, which he re-edified and sumptuously
-beautified on the outside with the Cardinal’s Arms, Hat, Cognisance,
-Badges, and other devices, in a glorious manner,’ to appease him. The
-fact seems to be that this old Gateway was built in the ordinary way
-when one Sir Amisius Pawlett was Treasurer.<a name="FNanchor_31_31" id="FNanchor_31_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a></p>
-
-<p>Adjoining this Gateway is Child’s Bank, where King Charles himself once
-banked, and Nell Gwynne and Prince Rupert, whose jewels were disposed of
-in a lottery by the firm. Part of this building covers the site of the
-famous Devil’s Tavern, which boasted the sign of St. Dunstan&mdash;patron of
-the Church so near at hand&mdash;tweaking the devil’s nose. Here Ben Jonson
-drank the floods of Canary that inspired his plays; hither to the sanded
-floor of the Apollo club-room came those boon companions of his who
-desired to be ‘sealed of the tribe of Ben,’ and here, in after-years,
-Dr. Johnson loved to foregather, and Swift with Addison, Steele with
-Bickerstaff.</p>
-
-<p>Immediately within the Gateway, on the left, is<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_067" id="page_067"></a>{67}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_007" id="ill_007"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 361px;">
-<a href="images/ill_008_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_008_sml.jpg" width="361" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">THE MIDDLE TEMPLE GATEHOUSE IN FLEET STREET</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">It</span> stands on the south side close to the site of Temple Bar, was
-designed by Sir Christopher Wren, and built in 1684.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">an old and very picturesque stationer’s shop, belonging to the firm of
-Abram and Sons, in whose family it has been since 1774. It is much more
-than a stationer’s shop, for Messrs. Abram have accumulated in the
-course of years a very valuable and interesting collection of old deeds
-and documents and prints. The overhanging stories of the house rest upon
-a row of slender iron pillars&mdash;pillars which Dr. Johnson used to touch
-with superstitious reverence each time he passed, in unconscious
-continuation of that ancient pillar-worship of which many traces linger,
-for those who have eyes to see, about the Temple and St. Paul’s. We are
-now in Middle Temple Lane, the narrow street down which the citizens of
-London were wont to hurry in order to take boat to Westminster from the
-Temple Stairs, in the days when the River was the highway between the
-City and the Court, between London and Westminster, the counting-houses
-of the merchants and the palace and abbey of the King. Of late years the
-introduction of tramways and of motor traffic on the Embankment has
-tended largely to revive the popularity of the old route, though not all
-the thousands of pounds squandered by the London County Council upon an
-ill-considered scheme of<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_068" id="page_068"></a>{68}</span> steamboats could induce the Londoner to adopt
-again the water-way, which the bend of the River and the tide must make
-slow. Next below us on the left is the group of chambers called Hare
-Court, a plain to ugly, red-brick to stock-brick barracks, through which
-one can reach the Temple Church. Beyond, on the right, we come to what
-remains of Brick Court. This is a most charming specimen of the Queen
-Anne style. An inscription over the doorway of No. 3, <i>Phœnicis
-instar revivisco</i>, informs us that it rose like the Phœnix from its
-ashes in 1704. But in this present year of Grace (1909), an old brick
-building has been removed, which fronted the Hall and the Lane, and
-which claimed to be the oldest building left in the Temple, the first
-constructed of brick, erected there in Elizabeth’s reign, and referred
-to by Spenser in the lines of his ‘Prothalamion’:&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i12">‘Those bricky towres,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">The which on Themmes brode aged backe doe ryde,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">Where now the studious lawyers have their bowers,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">There whylome wont the Templar Knights to byde,<br /></span>
-<span class="i0">Till they decayed thro’ pride.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">There is nothing, however, to prove that Spenser was referring to Brick
-Court. The ‘Prothalamion’<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_069" id="page_069"></a>{69}</span> was published in 1596; and I would suggest
-that the phrase ‘bricky towres’ might apply most naturally to the Middle
-Temple Hall.</p>
-
-<p>Of all the Chambers in the Inns of Court rich in reminiscences of famous
-men, none are so redolent of literary fame as No. 2, Brick Court. We
-cannot, as Thackeray<a name="FNanchor_32_32" id="FNanchor_32_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> wrote, who himself, like Winthrop Mackworth
-Praed, had chambers here, pass without emotion ‘the staircase which
-Johnson, Burke, and Reynolds trod to see their friend, their kind
-Goldsmith&mdash;the stair on which the poor women sat weeping bitterly when
-they heard that the greatest and most generous of all men was dead
-within the black oak door.’</p>
-
-<p>Not the Temple, but No. 6, Wine Office Court, nearly opposite the
-Cheshire Cheese, was the scene of Dr. Johnson’s famous rescue of the
-author of ‘The Vicar of Wakefield,’ who had been arrested by his
-landlady for his rent, and sent for his friend in great distress. ‘I
-sent him a guinea,’ says Johnson, ‘and promised to come to him
-directly.... I perceived that he had already changed my guinea, and had
-a bottle of Madeira and a glass before him. I put the cork into the
-bottle, desired he would be calm, and began to talk to him of the means
-by<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_070" id="page_070"></a>{70}</span> which he might be extricated. He then told me that he had a novel
-ready for the press. I looked into it, and saw its merit; told the
-landlady I should soon return, and, having gone to a bookseller, sold it
-for sixty pounds.’</p>
-
-<p>Goldsmith left Wine Office Court and lodged for a while in Gray’s Inn,
-and thence migrated to some humble Chambers upon the site of No. 2,
-Garden Court, Middle Temple (1764). These buildings have disappeared.
-But the success of his play, ‘The Good-Natured Man,’ for which he
-received £500, enabled him to launch forth into more splendid
-apartments. He purchased the lease of No. 2, Brick Court, which still
-stands as he left it, for £400. He furnished his rooms with mahogany and
-Wilton carpets, and, bedecking himself in a suit of ‘Tyrian bloom satin
-grain,’ prepared to entertain his most aristocratic acquaintances.
-Johnson, Percy, Reynolds, Bickerstaff, and a host of other friends of
-either sex, climbed those stairs to the rooms on the second floor on the
-right-hand side (‘two pair right’), were entertained to dinners and
-suppers, much to the discomposure of the studious Blackstone, who,
-painfully compiling his great ‘Commentaries’ in the chambers below,
-found good cause to grumble at the racket made by ‘his<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_071" id="page_071"></a>{71}</span> revelling
-neighbour.’<a name="FNanchor_33_33" id="FNanchor_33_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</a> And some years later the staircase that led to the rooms
-of that most lovable of geniuses was crowded by friends, ‘mourners of
-all ranks and conditions of life, conspicuous among them being the
-outcasts of both sexes, who loved and wept for him because of the
-goodness he had done.’<a name="FNanchor_34_34" id="FNanchor_34_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> For from these rooms, one April afternoon,
-the mortal remains of Oliver Goldsmith were borne forth, to be buried
-somewhere on the north side of the Temple Church. The exact spot is not
-known, but as near to it as can be ascertained a plain gravestone now
-bears the inscription (1860): ‘Here lies Oliver Goldsmith.’ The
-Goldsmith Buildings, that run parallel to the north side of the Church,
-belong, like Lamb Buildings, somewhat unexpectedly to the Middle Temple,
-but they have no immediate connection with Oliver Goldsmith.</p>
-
-<p>The bedroom in Goldsmith’s Chambers Thackeray describes as a mere
-closet, but he commented upon the excellence of the carved woodwork in
-the rooms. The windows looked upon a rookery, which for long flourished
-in the elm-trees, since cut down, which gave their name to Elm Court.
-Gazing upon this colony, Goldsmith, in the intervals<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_072" id="page_072"></a>{72}</span> of composing his
-‘Traveller’ or ‘Deserted Village,’ would note their ways, and so
-recorded them in his ‘Animated Nature’:<a name="FNanchor_35_35" id="FNanchor_35_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> ‘The rook builds in the
-neighbourhood of man, and sometimes makes choice of groves in the very
-midst of cities for the place of its retreat and security. In these it
-establishes a kind of legal constitution, by which all intruders are
-excluded from coming to live among them, and none suffered to build but
-acknowledged natives of the place. I have often amused myself with
-observing their plan of policy from my window in the Temple, that looks
-upon a grove where they have made a colony in the midst of the City....’</p>
-
-<p>In recent years many of the brightest ornaments of the English Bar have
-had Chambers in Brick Court, including Lord Coleridge, Lord Bowen, Lord
-Russell, and Sir William Anson. There is a sundial in this Court&mdash;one of
-the many for which the Inn is famous&mdash;from which Goldsmith may often
-have taken the hour. It warns us that Time and Tide tarry for no man,
-and took the place (1704) of one that bore the motto, ‘Begone about your
-business,’ of which the story goes that it was a Bencher’s curt
-dismissal of a Mason who asked him for the motto to be engraved thereon.</p>
-
-<p>The Buildings in the Inns grew up in haphazard<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_073" id="page_073"></a>{73}</span> fashion. They were
-erected by individual members or Benchers at their own cost, and
-interspersed with stalls and shops, with the sanction of the Benchers.
-The builders were granted the right of calling their blocks of chambers
-after their own names, if they chose, and of nominating a certain number
-of successors from among members of the Society, who might become
-tenants without paying rent to the Inn.</p>
-
-<p>To this haphazard method of building, and to the influence of numerous
-fires, is due the devious labyrinth of little Courts, the inextricable
-maze of blocks of Chambers, which lie upon our left as we descend Middle
-Temple Lane, and which lend so peculiar a character to the Temple Inns.
-Pump Court, Elm Court, Fig-Tree Court, which fill the spaces between the
-Lane and Wren’s Cloisters and the Inner Temple Hall, owe their irregular
-shape to these causes, and their titles to the chief features of the
-plots about which they were built.</p>
-
-<p>First comes Pump Court, where Henry Fielding, the novelist, and Cowper,
-the poet, once had chambers. Upon its old brick walls is a sundial with
-its warning motto: ‘Shadows we are, and like shadows depart.’<a name="FNanchor_36_36" id="FNanchor_36_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_36" class="fnanchor">[36]</a> The
-great fire of 1679,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_074" id="page_074"></a>{74}</span> which damaged the Middle Temple far more than the
-Fire of London, broke out at midnight in Pump Court. It raged for twelve
-hours. The Thames was frozen, and barrels of ale, so tradition runs,
-were broached to feed the pumping engines in lieu of water. Pump Court,
-Elm-Tree Court, Vine Court, the Cloisters, and part of Brick Court were
-consumed. The Church and Middle Temple Hall were only saved by the
-timely use of gunpowder, a device that had been found effective in the
-Great Fire of 1666.</p>
-
-<p>Elm Court Buildings, as they now are, date from 1880. They are built of
-good red brick and stone, but marred by feeble Renaissance ornament.
-They boast a sundial, facing the Lane, which proclaims that the years
-pass and are reckoned&mdash;<i>pereunt et imputantur</i>. The Middle Temple Lane
-ends in the atrocities of the nineteenth century: between the walls of
-the feeble Harcourt Buildings, the stock-brick ugliness of Plowden
-Buildings, which have rather less architectural charm than a
-soap-factory, and in the dreadful Temple Gardens and the Gateway which
-opens upon the Embankment, a gross abomination of florid ugliness.</p>
-
-<p>On the right, below Brick Court, beneath a gas-lamp raised upon a
-graceful iron arch, some steps<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_075" id="page_075"></a>{75}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_008" id="ill_008"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 356px;">
-<a href="images/ill_009_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_009_sml.jpg" width="356" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">FOUNTAIN COURT AND MIDDLE TEMPLE HALL</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">lead us to a raised pavement, dotted with a few plane-trees, beyond
-which lies the Fountain. This pavement is the forecourt of the Middle
-Temple Hall, a building which, in spite of restorations and recasings
-and counter-restorations, remains of unique and unsurpassed interest.
-For now that Crosby Hall is to be translated, it is the only building
-left <i>in situ</i> in London which can be directly and certainly connected
-with William Shakespeare. The Middle Temples had an ancient Hall between
-Pump Court and Elm Court, the west end of which abutted upon Middle
-Temple Lane. This was superseded in 1572 by the present famous building.</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘Gray’s Inn for walks,<br /></span>
-<span class="i2">Lincoln’s Inn for a wall,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">The Inner Temple for a garden,<br /></span>
-<span class="i2">And the Middle for a Hall.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>The old doggerel lines fairly sum up the features of the Inns. And this
-lovely Hall of the Middle Temple, whose proportions are so fair&mdash;it is
-100 feet by 42 feet by 47 feet high&mdash;produces a delightful impression of
-space and lightness. A magnificent timber roof with Elizabethan
-hammer-beams harmonizes with the rich panelling, on which are painted
-the arms of ‘Readers,’ and the gorgeous carving of the Renaissance
-Screen, which was<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_076" id="page_076"></a>{76}</span> erected in 1574, some fourteen years before the date
-of the Spanish Armada, from the spoils of which fond tradition says it
-was constructed.</p>
-
-<p>The Hall is very rich in heraldry, and has some interesting portraits,
-chiefly of royal personages. Above the Bench Table hangs Van Dyck’s
-portrait of Charles I. The windows illustrate the survival of Gothic
-detail long after other details had passed into the Italian style. The
-points are very slight, but contrast sharply enough with the Renaissance
-curves and pendent roof. There is some modern stained glass, tolerable
-in colour, but incongruous in style.</p>
-
-<p>Parliament Chamber and the Benchers’ rooms are approached through old
-carved oak doors, relics of the old Hall in Pump Court.</p>
-
-<p>The Entrance Tower was designed by Savage (1831): the Louvre was
-restored by Hakewill. An oil-painting, attributed to Hogarth, of the
-Hall Court, with the Entrance Tower of the Hall in its ancient state, is
-to be seen in the Benchers’ Committee Room of the Inner Temple.</p>
-
-<p>One of the most splendid Refectories in England, comparable to the Hall
-of Christ Church at Oxford, this noble room adds to the charm of its
-beauty the charm of a literary memorial. For from this<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_077" id="page_077"></a>{77}</span> stage the
-exquisite poetry and gentle fun of Shakespeare’s ‘Twelfth Night’ first
-fell upon the ears of the listening lawyers upon occasion of a Christmas
-Revel three hundred years ago. Here Shakespeare himself, we must
-believe, has trodden; those rafters rang once with the poet’s voice. For
-even if he did not act himself in his play that night of wonderful
-Post-Revels&mdash;and that, in spite of tradition, is indeed scarcely
-probable, for the dramas performed on these occasions were, as we have
-seen, acted by members of the Inn&mdash;yet it is more than probable that he
-would be employed as Stage-Manager for the occasion, and would take his
-natural part in rehearsing the play.</p>
-
-<p>It so happens that one John Manningham&mdash;a fellow-student, by the way, of
-John Pym&mdash;kept a diary of his residence in the Temple from 1601 to 1603.
-That diary has been preserved among the Harleian Manuscripts now in the
-British Museum. And on February, 160½, he made a note which will cause
-his name to live for ever. ‘At our feast,’ he wrote, ‘Wee had a play
-called “Twelve Night, or What you will,” much like the “Commedy of
-Errores,” or “Menechmi” in Plautus, but most like and neere to that in
-Italian called “Inganni.”<a name="FNanchor_37_37" id="FNanchor_37_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_37" class="fnanchor">[37]</a></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_078" id="page_078"></a>{78}</span></p>
-
-<p>And to this stately Hall, we may be sure, came Elizabeth, surrounded by
-a brilliant group of statesmen, lawyers, sailors, to witness such plays,
-or perchance to lead the dance with some comely courtier like Sir
-Christopher Hatton. The connection of the Middle Temple with the great
-Elizabethan Admirals and Adventurers is indeed noteworthy.</p>
-
-<p>Sir Francis Drake was honourably received by the Benchers in this Hall
-after his victories in the West Indies (1586), and in the Hall, below
-the daïs, is a serving-table made out of the timber of his ship, the
-<i>Golden Hind</i>. He had been admitted, <i>honoris causa</i>, to the Society of
-the Inner Temple four years earlier. Other famous Elizabethan seamen
-were admitted at the Middle Temple in the persons of Sir Martin
-Frobisher, Admiral Norris, Sir Francis Vere (all in 1592), and Sir John
-Hawkins (1594). Taken in conjunction with the fact that Richard Hakluyt,
-the elder, was a Bencher of the Middle Temple; that Sir Walter Raleigh,
-who had been admitted to membership of the Inn in 1575, placed the
-expedition he sent out in 1602 under the command of Bartholomew Gosnold,
-another Middle Templar; that the records show that several members of
-the Middle Temple were interested in the early development of Virginia;<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_079" id="page_079"></a>{79}</span>
-and that the Inn possesses the only existing copy of the ‘Molyneux
-Globes,’ this and other indications seem to justify Mr. Bedwell’s
-contention<a name="FNanchor_38_38" id="FNanchor_38_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_38" class="fnanchor">[38]</a> that ‘the colonizing enterprises of the closing years of
-the sixteenth century were closely associated with the Middle Temple,’
-and that on both sides of the Atlantic members of that Inn took a
-prominent part in the ‘birth of the American Nation.’</p>
-
-<p>This connection with the Colonies, natural, necessary and profitable
-both to those new countries, which thus obtained the services of
-educated men&mdash;Governors trained in knowledge of affairs, and
-Attorney-Generals imbued with the high traditions of English Law&mdash;and to
-the Inns themselves, which were thus kept in touch with the New World,
-is illustrated by the fact that the Middle Temple is represented by no
-less than five of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence. Of
-these, Thomas McKean is said to have written the Constitution of
-Delaware in a single night. And of the other four, Edward Rutledge,
-Thomas Lynch, Thomas Heyward, and Arthur Midleton&mdash;all Representatives
-of South Carolina&mdash;the first is believed to have drafted the greater
-part of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_080" id="page_080"></a>{80}</span> Constitution of that State, and was afterwards Chairman of
-the Committee of Five who drafted the first Constitution of the United
-States.</p>
-
-<p>Meanwhile the literary and dramatic tradition of the Middle Temple was
-continued by such members of the Society as Congreve, Wycherley, Ford,
-Sir Thomas Overbury, and Shadwell, King William’s Poet Laureate, who
-lives in Dryden’s Satire. Later, that tradition was continued by
-Sheridan, Thomas Moore, Thomas de Quincey, and Henry Hallam, the
-historian of the Middle Ages.</p>
-
-<p>Since 1688, when a change was made in the oath of supremacy, which, by a
-statute of 1563, all Utter Barristers were required to take, the names
-of the members of the Inns of Court who are entitled to practise in the
-Courts have been preserved in the Barristers’ Roll. Since 1868
-barristers have been excused the oath, but the Roll must still be signed
-after call to the Bar. The lists are kept in the Public Record Office.</p>
-
-<p>The names of eminence inscribed upon this wonderful Roll can only be
-hinted at here. The Middle Temple can boast such great lawyers as Edmund
-Plowden and Blackstone, and Lord Chancellors in Clarendon, Jeffreys (who
-was a student here, but called to the Bar at the Inner<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_081" id="page_081"></a>{81}</span> Temple), Somers,
-Cowper, and Eldon; whilst Mansfield, C.J., Lord Ashburton, Robert
-Gifford, Lord Stowell, Lord Campbell, Cockburn, the Norths, and the
-Pollocks, were men and lawyers of no less eminence. Nor must we omit to
-mention one whose undying fame was earned, not in the Courts, but in the
-Camp; for Sir Henry Havelock, the hero of Cawnpore and Lucknow, figured
-among the Templars ere he went to India. Of another kind of eminence was
-Elias Ashmole, the Antiquary, whose name lives at Oxford. In the
-destructive fire of 1678 he lost in his rooms at the Middle Temple his
-papers, books, and rich collection of coins and medals. His friend, John
-Evelyn, the diarist, also had rooms in the Middle Temple, in Essex
-Court, just over against the Hall Court (1640).</p>
-
-<p>The north wing of Essex Court, which forms part of Brick Court, was
-rebuilt in 1883;<a name="FNanchor_39_39" id="FNanchor_39_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_39" class="fnanchor">[39]</a> the remainder of these charming brick buildings,
-with the Wigmaker’s shop, belong to the second half of the seventeenth
-century.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_082" id="page_082"></a>{82}</span></p>
-
-<p>Though the Gateway which leads to Middle Temple Lane is the grander,
-there is another entrance by ‘the little Gate,’ which is still more
-charming and characteristic. Screened by the tortuous ways of Devereux
-Court, an old wrought-iron gate opens onto an ancient and spacious
-quadrangle.</p>
-
-<p>As we stand beneath the old brick buildings of this ‘New Court’&mdash;so
-‘new’ that it was built by Sir Christopher Wren (1677)&mdash;the whole charm
-of the Temple scenery unfolds before our eyes, and we understand at once
-the ‘cheerful, liberal look of it’ which Charles Lamb loved.</p>
-
-<p>For below us lies the most unique and one of the loveliest views in
-London, a city of beautiful vistas. A flight of steps, framed by ancient
-iron standards bearing the sign of the Lamb, leads down to a Fountain in
-the centre of a broad paved terrace. And through the trees that shade it
-we catch glimpses of green lawns and flower-beds hedged about by Hall
-and Library and Chambers. Here still, beneath the shady trees&mdash;though
-Goldsmith’s rooks no longer caw in them&mdash;sparkles the water of the
-Temple Fountain, though the Fountain itself is not that which provoked
-Lamb’s wit, nor that which Dickens loved. It was through the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_083" id="page_083"></a>{83}</span> smoky
-shrubs of Fountain Court that the delicate figure of Ruth Pinch flitted,
-in fulfilment of her little plot of assignation with Tom, who was always
-to come out of the Temple past the Fountain and look for her ‘down the
-steps leading into Garden Court,’ to be greeted ‘with the best little
-laugh upon her face that ever played in opposition to the Fountain, and
-beat it all to nothing. The Temple Fountain might have leaped twenty
-feet to greet the spring of hopeful maidenhood that in her person stole
-on, sparkling, through the dry and dusty channels of the Law; the
-chirping sparrows, bred in Temple chinks and crannies, might have held
-their peace to listen to imaginary skylarks, as so fresh a little
-creature passed; the dingy boughs, unused to droop, otherwise than in
-their puny growth, might have bent down in a kindred gracefulness, to
-shed their benedictions on her graceful head; old love letters, shut up
-in iron boxes in the neighbouring offices, and made of no account among
-the heaps of family papers into which they had strayed, and of which, in
-their degeneracy, they formed a part, might have stirred and fluttered
-with a moment’s recollection of their ancient tenderness, as she went
-lightly by.’<a name="FNanchor_40_40" id="FNanchor_40_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_084" id="page_084"></a>{84}</span></p>
-
-<p>From the Fountain Terrace we look down upon a terraced garden framed by
-various blocks of buildings, which, if they do not group and harmonize
-so as to form a perfect whole, yet produce an effect which is quite
-singular and has a charm of its own. Beneath the Terrace, on the left
-the west end of the Hall abuts upon a green lawn; on the right a flight
-of steps leads down to a path which skirts the not unpleasing gabled
-façade, in red brick and stone, of the Garden Court (1883). Facing us
-now, are the steps which lead up to the embattled Lobby of the Library,
-beneath which an archway leads to the Library Chambers facing Milford
-Lane. Hence a private gate leads out into the Lane, where are the steps
-to Essex Street, remains of the old Water Gate of Essex House. The
-left-hand side of the green parallelogram of garden is formed by those
-ugly Plowden Buildings, for which the only hope is that they may soon be
-buried in the decent obscurity of Virginia Creeper, which can cover a
-multitude of architectural sins, and the still uglier Temple Gardens,
-and the Gateway, for which there is no hope at all.</p>
-
-<p>In Dugdale’s time the Middle Temple Library, owing to the fact that it
-always stood open, had been completely despoiled of books. The present<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_085" id="page_085"></a>{85}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_009" id="ill_009"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 354px;">
-<a href="images/ill_010_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_010_sml.jpg" width="354" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">MIDDLE TEMPLE LIBRARY</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">On</span> the left are the buttresses of Middle Temple Hall.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">building, in the Gothic style by H. R. Abraham, is ugly in itself, its
-proportions, especially when viewed from the Embankment, being painfully
-bad. Its height is far too great for its length and breadth, and this is
-due to the fact that two stories of offices and chambers are beneath the
-Library Room, which is approached by a charming outside staircase. The
-Library itself, which is 86 feet long, is a beautiful room with a fine
-open hammer-beam roof. It was opened on October 31, 1861, by King Edward
-VII., then Prince of Wales, who was called to the Bar and admitted as a
-Bencher of the Middle Temple on the same day.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_086" id="page_086"></a>{86}</span></p>
-
-<h2><a name="CHAPTER_V" id="CHAPTER_V"></a>CHAPTER V<br /><br />
-<small>THE INNER TEMPLE</small></h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">Mr. Loftie</span> very justly observes of the Middle Temple that ‘Its Lawn
-seems wider, its trees are higher, its Hall is older, its Courts are
-quainter, than those of the other member of this inseparable pair.’ The
-Middle Temple has, indeed, been unkindly compared to a beautiful woman
-with a plain husband. This comparison, however, is far from just. For
-though its beauty is perhaps less obvious and has been much impaired by
-the ravages of modern builders, yet the Inner Temple remains a <i>locus
-classicus</i> for the fine beauty of the Jacobean and Queen Anne styles,
-and across its green lawn the view of the Embankment, the River, and
-Surrey Hills&mdash;too often, alas! shrouded in smoke&mdash;is extremely
-delightful. Moreover, the heart of the Inner Temple presents the
-engaging completeness of a Collegiate Building. The Church and Master’s
-House on the North; the Cloisters on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_087" id="page_087"></a>{87}</span> West; the Buttery,
-Refectories, Hall, and Library on the South; the Master’s Garden, the
-Graveyard and Garden of the Inn on the East, form just such a Court or
-Quadrangle as delights the eye at Oxford or Cambridge.</p>
-
-<p>I have spoken of the Inner Temple Gateway. In King’s Bench Walk&mdash;once
-known as Benchers’ Walk&mdash;the Inner Temple can boast a row of typical
-Jacobean mansions, with handsome doorways,<a name="FNanchor_41_41" id="FNanchor_41_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_41" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> which look upon a broad
-and classic avenue of trees. Nor can an Inn, which records the names of
-Sir Edward Coke and of John Selden amongst its members, and which was
-the home of Dr. Johnson and Charles Lamb, be reckoned inferior to any in
-the fame and interest of its <i>alumni</i>.</p>
-
-<p>Dr. Johnson moved from Staple Inn to Gray’s Inn, and from Gray’s Inn to
-No. 1, Inner Temple Lane (1760). Here, in a spot so favourable for
-retirement and meditation, as Boswell calls it, in a house whose site is
-indicated by the ugly block of Johnson’s Buildings (1851), were those
-rooms which have been so vividly described by the great man’s admirers.
-Here, in two garrets over his chambers, his library was stored, ‘good<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_088" id="page_088"></a>{88}</span>
-books, but very dusty and in great confusion.’ Here was housed an
-apparatus for the chemical experiments in which he delighted, whilst the
-floor was strewn with his manuscripts for Boswell to scan ‘with a degree
-of veneration, supposing they might perhaps contain portions of the
-“Rambler” or of “Rasselas.”<span class="lftspc">’</span> It was in his chambers here on the first
-floor, furnished like an old counting-house, that the uncouth genius
-received Madame de Boufflers&mdash;received her, no doubt, clad, as usual, in
-a rusty brown suit, discoloured with snuff, an old black wig too small
-for his head, his shirt collar and sleeves unbuttoned, his black worsted
-stockings slipping down to his feet, which were thrust into a pair of
-unbuckled shoes. And then, when he began to talk, ‘with all the
-correctness of a second edition,’ all thought of his slovenly appearance
-and his uncouth gestures vanished; the knowledge and the racy wit of the
-man triumphed. We see the lady, fascinated by the great man’s
-conversation, bowed out of those dirty old rooms, whilst the ponderous
-scholar rolls back to his books. Then her escort hears ‘all at once a
-noise like thunder.’ It has occurred to Johnson that he ought to have
-done the honours of his literary residence to a foreign lady of
-quality.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_089" id="page_089"></a>{89}</span></p>
-
-<p>Eager to show himself a man of gallantry, he hurries down the stairs in
-violent agitation. ‘He overtook us,’ says Beauclerc, ‘before we reached
-the Temple Gate, and, brushing in between me and Madame de Boufflers,
-seized her hand and conducted her to the coach.’ To the bottom of Inner
-Temple Lane came the devoted Boswell, and took chambers in Farrar’s
-Buildings&mdash;now rebuilt (1876)&mdash;in order to be near to the object of his
-biographical enthusiasm. Another name famous in Literature the Inner
-Temple can boast. Francis Beaumont, the dramatist, was a Member of this
-Inn, and in 1612 he wrote the Masques performed by this Inn and Gray’s
-Inn before King James at Whitehall, in honour of the marriage of
-Princess Elizabeth and the Count Palatine of the Rhine. This Masque he
-dedicated to Sir Francis Bacon, who represented Gray’s Inn in its
-preparation.</p>
-
-<p>The grey walls of Paper Buildings; the plain yellow brick of Crown
-Office Row; the stock-brick of Mitre Court, the Goldsmith Buildings that
-have supplanted the dingy attic of No. 4, Inner Temple Lane, which
-looked through the trees upon the (now vanished) pump in Hare Court, are
-none of them buildings which in themselves can<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_090" id="page_090"></a>{90}</span> stir any emotion but
-repulsion, but they have a lasting charm and interest, for they are the
-sites of the homes of Elia; they are haunted by the ‘old familiar faces’
-of Charles Lamb and his friends.</p>
-
-<p>Charles Lamb first saw the light in No. 2, Crown Office Row, ‘right
-opposite the stately stream which washes the garden-foot,’ and there
-passed the first seven years of his life. ‘Its church, its halls, its
-gardens, its fountain, its river, I had almost said, for in those young
-years what was this king of rivers to me but a stream that watered our
-pleasant places?&mdash;these are of my earliest recollections.’</p>
-
-<p>The name of these buildings was derived naturally enough, because, at
-least from the days of Henry VII., the Clerk of the Crown occupied the
-Crown Office in this Inn until its removal to the Courts of Justice in
-1882. The eastern yellow brick half of the row, Nos. 1, 2, and 3, was
-built in 1737, the western half, Nos. 4, 5, and 6, of stone in the
-Italian style, in 1864, by Sydney Smirke. The Row no longer extends to
-No. 10, where Thackeray had chambers, sharing them possibly with Tom
-Taylor, before he migrated to No. 2, Brick Court.</p>
-
-<p>Of his old Chambers here Taylor wrote with<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_091" id="page_091"></a>{91}</span> affectionate regret when he
-heard of the ‘bringing low of those old chambers, dear old friend, at
-Ten, Crown Office Row.’</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘They were fusty, they were musty, they were grimy, dull, and dim,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">The paint scaled off the panelling, the stairs were all untrim;<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">The flooring creaked, the windows gaped, the doorposts stood awry,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">The wind whipt round the corner with a wild and wailing cry.<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">In a dingier set of chambers no man need wish to stow,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Than those, old friend, wherein we denned at Ten, Crown Office Row.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>The present Mitre Court Buildings date from 1830. At No. 16, in the old
-block, Charles Lamb once lived (1800), preferring ‘the attic story for
-the air.’ ‘Bring your glass,’ he writes to a friend, ‘and I will show
-you the Surrey Hills. My bed faces the river, so as by perking upon my
-haunches and supporting my carcass upon my elbows, without much wrying
-my neck, I can see the white sails glide by the bottom of King’s Bench
-Walk, as I lie in my bed.’ In Fuller’s Rents, now replaced by Nos. 1 and
-2, Mitre Court Buildings, the Earl of Leicester, Elizabeth’s favourite,
-and<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_092" id="page_092"></a>{92}</span> Sir Edward Coke, the great Chief Justice, once had chambers (1588
-<i>ff.</i>).<a name="FNanchor_42_42" id="FNanchor_42_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_42" class="fnanchor">[42]</a></p>
-
-<p>Coke was a Bencher before he became Chief Justice and wrote upon
-Lyttleton. Sir Thomas Lyttleton (author of the famous ‘Treatise on
-Tenures’) is the first name upon the list of the Benchers of the Inner
-Temple.</p>
-
-<p>A heavy iron gate, shut at night, marks the entry to Mitre Court and
-what was formerly Ram Alley. Between the North side of Mitre Court
-Buildings and the entrance to Serjeants’ Inn are the remains of a small
-garden, marked by a few sickly trees. Beyond, is a passage leading into
-Serjeants’ Inn, which is approached by a flight of steps, and is shut
-off from Mitre Court by a door, which at the present day is seldom, if
-ever, closed. Through this private way of his, the lines of which can
-still be traced, the compact and wiry figure of the great Lord Chief
-Justice, Coke, might often have been seen passing between the two
-Inns.<a name="FNanchor_43_43" id="FNanchor_43_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a></p>
-
-<p>From 1809 to 1817 Charles Lamb lived at No. 4, Inner Temple Lane, a
-house that has been replaced by part of the ugly Johnson’s Buildings.
-‘It looks out,’ he says, ‘upon a gloomy churchyard-like Court,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_093" id="page_093"></a>{93}</span> called
-Hare Court, with three trees and a pump in it. I was born near it, and
-used to drink at that pump, when I was a Rechabite of six years old.’</p>
-
-<p>‘That goodly pile of building strong, albeit of Paper hight,’ as Lamb
-facetiously calls it, succeeded Heyward’s Buildings, where Selden
-laboured. Paper Buildings were burnt down in 1838, thanks to the
-carelessness of Sir John Maule, the eccentric Judge, who left a candle
-burning by his bedside. Both he and Campbell, afterwards Chancellor,
-lost everything in the flames.</p>
-
-<p>In Paper Buildings George Canning, the Statesman, and Samuel Rogers, the
-poet, had chambers, and Lord Ellenborough also (No. 6). The present
-block, by Smirke, contains the chambers of another Prime Minister in Mr.
-Asquith. The Inner Temple can boast yet another Premier in George
-Grenville, who became Prime Minister (1763) in the same year as he was
-elected Bencher.</p>
-
-<p>The name of Edward Thurlow, the rough-tongued, overbearing Lord
-Chancellor, is unhappily connected, like that of Grenville, with the
-policy which resulted in the loss of our American Colonies.</p>
-
-<p>Thurlow had chambers in Fig-Tree Court, the smallest and most dismal of
-these legal warrens in<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_094" id="page_094"></a>{94}</span> the Temple. He died in 1806, and was buried in
-the Temple Church.</p>
-
-<p>Amongst other great lawyers who had chambers in Paper Buildings, Stephen
-Lushington, Edward Hall Alderson, and Sir Frank Lockwood must be named.</p>
-
-<p>Paper Buildings form the Western boundary of the ‘Great Garden,’ which,
-indeed, before the erection of buildings here, used to extend to King’s
-Bench Walk. It stretched from Whitefriars to Harcourt Buildings and
-Middle Temple Lane, and from the Hall to the river wall, and if it has
-been narrowed by Paper Buildings, it has been elongated by the
-successive embankments of the River. Always carefully cultivated and
-planted with shrubs and roses, it remains, little altered by the passing
-centuries, one of the sweetest and most grateful of things&mdash;a trim
-garden in the midst of a grimy town. This is the scene chosen for that
-great and growing Flower Show, which is one of the most popular and
-pleasing of the social functions of the London season. The great
-wrought-iron gate opposite Crown Office Row is a magnificent specimen of
-eighteenth-century craftsmanship. It will be noticed that it bears, in
-addition to the winged Horse, the arms of<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_095" id="page_095"></a>{95}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_010" id="ill_010"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;">
-<a href="images/ill_011_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_011_sml.jpg" width="350" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">HALL AND LIBRARY, INNER TEMPLE</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">Crown Office Row</span> is on the left, Paper Buildings on the right. The
-Gardens run right down to the Thames Embankment, and are the scene of
-the Temple Flower Show.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Gray’s Inn&mdash;a compliment to the ancient ally of this Inn, which was
-returned upon the gateway of Gray’s Inn Gardens, and over the arch of
-the Gatehouse leading to Gray’s Inn Road. It was upon the neighbouring
-terrace that the Old Benchers, of whom Lamb wrote so pleasingly, used to
-pace. Immediately within the railings is a sundial, which dates from the
-beginning of the eighteenth century. Of these ‘garden gods of Christian
-gardens, these primitive clocks, the horologes of the first world, there
-is a delightful profusion in the Temple. Best known of all of them,
-perhaps, is that which is borne by a kneeling black figure in a corner
-of the garden near the foot of King’s Bench Walk. It was brought here
-from Clement’s Inn. The oft-quoted epigram, which was one day found
-attached to this Blackamoor, is feeble enough:</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘In vain, poor sable son of woe,<br /></span>
-<span class="i2">Thou seek’st the tender tear;<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">From thee in vain with pangs they flow,<br /></span>
-<span class="i2">For mercy dwells not here.<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">From cannibals thou fled’st in vain;<br /></span>
-<span class="i2">Lawyers less quarter give&mdash;<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">The first won’t eat you till you’re slain,<br /></span>
-<span class="i2">The last will do’t alive.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Occasionally as I pass these many sundials, shrouded in the yellow haze
-of London fog, or<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_096" id="page_096"></a>{96}</span> scarce visible through the murk upon the dark walls
-of narrow Courts, I find myself repeating Edward Fitzgerald’s mot, when,
-after a wet week spent with James Spedding at Mirehouse, he gazed
-reflectively upon the sundial in the garden there, and observed: ‘It
-<i>must</i> have an easy time of it.’</p>
-
-<p>Fires, frequent and disastrous, have destroyed nearly all the old
-buildings in the Inner Temple. Only the Church and a fragment of the
-Hall survive from medieval days. The Great Fire (1666), which left the
-Middle Temple almost unscathed, wrought devastation in the Inner. The
-Inn was then rebuilt with great rapidity, the erection of Chambers being
-left to the enterprise of Members, as before, whilst the Society as a
-whole devoted itself to the construction of the Library and Moot-Chamber
-beneath. In the fire of 1678 the old Library was blown up with gunpowder
-in order to save the Hall.</p>
-
-<p>The present Inner Temple Hall is a crude, pseudo-Gothic structure, which
-was designed by Sydney Smirke, and was opened by the Princess Louise in
-1870. It supplanted the restored and tinkered remains of the old Hall.
-For the ancient Refectory of the Knights Templars<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_097" id="page_097"></a>{97}</span> stood in the time of
-Henry VII. on the same site as this Hall, and does, indeed, form the
-nucleus of it.<a name="FNanchor_44_44" id="FNanchor_44_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_44" class="fnanchor">[44]</a> The Clock Tower, at the East end of the Library,
-which forms one side of the nondescript Tanfield Court, perpetuates an
-ancient tower, which was surmounted by a turret built of chalk, rubble,
-and ragstone, like the Church, and carried a bell under a wooden cupola.
-It stood near to this spot, and was attached to the Treasurer’s house.
-The feeble architecture of the exterior is agreeably at variance with
-the fine interior of the Hall, with its open timber roof and handsome
-screen. Upon the panelled walls, like those of the Middle Temple Hall,
-are painted the coats of arms of past Treasurers and Readers, in
-perpetuation, as it were, of the old custom of the Knights Templars, who
-used to hang their shields upon the walls when they sat two by two at
-dinner in the old Hall, wherein, as the Accusers averred, the Novices of
-the Order were compelled to spit upon the Cross, to kiss an Idol with a
-black face and shining eyes, and to worship the Golden Head kept in the
-Treasury adjoining. The doors in the panelling at the East End lead now
-to nothing more thrilling<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_098" id="page_098"></a>{98}</span> than Parliament Chambers&mdash;‘a handsome set of
-rooms, the walls of which are covered with portraits and engravings of
-legal luminaries.’<a name="FNanchor_45_45" id="FNanchor_45_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_45" class="fnanchor">[45]</a></p>
-
-<p>In the minstrel gallery hang some old drums and banners, which serve to
-remind us of the martial achievements of the Lawyers, when ‘forth they
-ride a-colonelling.’ Two very richly carved doors at the north and south
-entrances to the Hall, one of which bears the date 1575, are reasonably
-supposed to be surviving fragments of the great carved screen, said by
-Dugdale to have been erected in the Hall in 1574.</p>
-
-<p>The four fine bronze statues of Knights Templars and Knights
-Hospitallers are by H. H. Armstead (1875). The Hall is rich in
-portraits. Beneath a large painting of Pegasus are portraits of King
-William III. and Queen Mary, of Queen Anne, George II., and Queen
-Caroline. Portraits of Sir Edward Coke and Sir Thomas Lyttleton, Sir
-Matthew Hale, Sir Randolph Carew, and Sir Simon Harcourt, among others,
-hang upon the walls.</p>
-
-<p>The old Hall of this, as of the other Inns, was frequently the scene of
-Revels and Merry-making.<a name="FNanchor_46_46" id="FNanchor_46_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46_46" class="fnanchor">[46]</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_099" id="page_099"></a>{99}</span> Here, as elsewhere, Christmas Feasts
-formed prominent incidents in the life of the Society, and one such has
-been described by Gerard Leigh (1576), when the guests were served ‘with
-tender meats, sweet fruits and dainty delicates confectioned with other
-curious cookery ... and at every course the Trumpeters blew the
-courageous blast of deadly War, with noise of drum and fyfe; with the
-sweet harmony of Violins, Sackbutts, Recorders and Cornetts, with other
-instruments of music, as it seemed Apollo’s harp had tuned their stroke.
-Thus the Hall was served after the most antient of the Island.’ And it
-was in the old Hall of the Inner Temple that the first performance of
-the first English tragedy took place in 1561. This was ‘Gorboduc; or
-Ferrex and Porrex,’ and it was written by two distinguished members of
-this<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_100" id="page_100"></a>{100}</span> Society: Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville. A hundred years later
-Sir Heneage Finch, afterwards Lord Chancellor and Earl of Nottingham,
-‘the Oracle of Impartial Justice,’ gave in this Hall the most
-magnificent ‘Reader’s Feast’ upon record.</p>
-
-<p>King Charles came in his barge from Whitehall, with his Court, and was
-received at the Stairs by the Reader and the Lord Chief Justice in his
-scarlet robes. He passed into the Temple Garden through rows of Readers’
-servants, clad in scarlet cloaks and white Tabba doubtlets, and the
-Gentlemen of the Society in their gowns, whilst music and violins
-sounded a welcome to His Majesty. The Duke of York was also present upon
-this occasion, and so delighted was he with the entertainment that he,
-together with Prince Rupert, was at once admitted to the Society, and
-presently became a Bencher.</p>
-
-<p>Sir Heneage Finch was the most famous of a long line of distinguished
-members of that family who have been Benchers. It is characteristic of
-the Inner Temple that it has and always has had a tendency for members
-of the same families to supply the vacancies among the Benchers. The
-Pollocks, Wests, Wards, and Finches point back<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_101" id="page_101"></a>{101}</span> to a long roll of
-ancestors distinguished in the Law and the annals of the Temple. This
-tendency coincides with the aristocratic nature of the Society. For many
-centuries a candidate for Bencher was required to show at least three
-generations of ‘gentle blood,’ a regulation which affords a curious
-contrast to the more democratic nature of Oxford and Cambridge. In
-Elizabeth’s reign it was ordered that ‘none should be admitted of the
-Society, except he were of good parentage and not of ill-behaviour.’
-Such another Inner Temple family was that of the Hares, who lived for
-generations in Hare Court, the south side of which was built by Nicholas
-Hare about 1570. Hare Court, together with the rooms once occupied by
-Chief Justice Jeffreys, has been recently rebuilt. A doubtful portrait
-of that ferocious Judge by Sir Peter Lely was presented to the Inn by
-Sir Harry Poland, K.C.</p>
-
-<p>The exterior of the Library Building is not imposing. It contains on the
-ground and first floors the Parliament Chambers, offices, and
-lecture-rooms, and on the second floor a very fine library, admirably
-arranged in a room perfectly suited to the student.</p>
-
-<p>Very early indications of a Library existing with<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_102" id="page_102"></a>{102}</span> chambers under it are
-found in the records. It stood at the west end of the Hall. A later
-building, apparently, at the east end of the Hall was afterwards used as
-the Library, and was rebuilt in 1680, after having been destroyed by
-gunpowder in 1678 in order to save the Hall from the fire in that year.</p>
-
-<p>The north wing, upon the site of No. 2, Tanfield Court, was opened in
-1882. A case containing a collection of ‘Serjeants’ Rings’ is of some
-interest. In the anteroom to the Parliament Chambers hangs a portrait of
-William Petyt, a former Treasurer of the House and Keeper of the Records
-at the Tower, who bequeathed his exceedingly valuable collection of
-historical documents, etc., to the Inn. A fine piece of carving by
-Grinling Gibbons, as it is supposed, which is placed in this anteroom
-also, bears the inscription ‘T. Thoma Walker Arm. <small>A.D.</small> 1705,’ and was
-the result of a payment of £20 5s. made by Sylvester Petyt, Principal of
-Barnard’s Inn and brother of William, as executor of the latter’s
-will.<a name="FNanchor_47_47" id="FNanchor_47_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_47" class="fnanchor">[47]</a></p>
-
-<p>The narrow alley that leads from Fleet Street through Mitre Court and
-Mitre Buildings, gives little promise of the broad open expanse of
-gravel<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_103" id="page_103"></a>{103}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_011" id="ill_011"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 356px;">
-<a href="images/ill_012_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_012_sml.jpg" width="356" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">NO. 5, KING’S BENCH WALK, INNER TEMPLE</p>
-
-<p class="c"><span class="smcap">A doorway</span>, probably by Sir Christopher Wren.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">walks, sparsely dotted with plane-trees, and narrowing down to a distant
-glimpse of gardens, and of the River beyond, to which it guides our
-feet.</p>
-
-<p>This stretch of gravel walks is enclosed on the west by Paper Buildings
-and on the east by the buildings of the King’s Bench Walk. The lower
-half of the latter, below the gateway leading into Temple Lane, and
-facing the Gardens, dates from 1780, and is quite devoid of
-architectural merit or even any pretence to it; but the northern section
-is composed of houses of rare excellence. The fine proportions, the
-appropriate material, the handsome doorways of these houses, and the
-graceful iron lamp-brackets in front of them (Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6), all
-proclaim the influence of a great master in a good period. The doorways
-of Nos. 4 and 5 are, indeed, with every probability, attributed to Sir
-Christopher Wren, whose genius was largely employed in the re-building
-of the Temple. For the Fire of London reached the Temple two days after
-it broke out, and almost completely destroyed all the buildings east of
-the Church, King’s Bench Walk included. The houses then were quickly
-rebuilt, but, as an inscription on a tablet on No. 4 records, only to be
-burnt down again in 1677. No. 4 was rebuilt in 1678, No. 5 in 1684.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_104" id="page_104"></a>{104}</span></p>
-
-<p>In No. 1, James Scarlett, Lord Abinger, had chambers; at No. 5, William
-Murray, Lord Mansfield, of whom Colley Cibber, parodying the lines of
-Pope, wrote:</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘Persuasion tips his tongue whene’er he talks,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">And he has chambers in the King’s Bench Walks.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Another famous lawyer who had rooms here was Frederick Thesiger, Lord
-Chelmsford. The most remarkable of the cases tried by him is said to
-have formed the basis of Samuel Warren’s ‘Ten Thousand a Year,’ a novel
-whose title we most of us know now better than its contents. The author
-of this popular novel, with its legal satire of Quirk, Gammon, and Snap,
-was written at No. 12, King’s Bench Walk, in what Warren calls ‘this
-green old solitude, pleasantly recalling long past scenes of the
-bustling professional life’;&mdash;though how King’s Bench Walk can be called
-a solitude, or why a solitude should recall the bustling professional
-life, deponent sayeth not. Warren was treasurer in 1868. A painting,
-attributed to Hogarth, of King’s Bench Walk in 1734, hangs in the
-Benchers’ Committee Room, together with a painting of Fountain Court,
-also attributed to him. At No. 3 lived Goldsmith in 1765.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_105" id="page_105"></a>{105}</span></p>
-
-<p>And now, since we have drifted again from law to poetry, mention must be
-made of two other poets whose names are connected with the Inner Temple.
-About the year 1755 William Cowper left his lodging in the Middle
-Temple, and took Chambers in the Inner, remaining there till his removal
-to the Asylum ten years later. That was nearly three hundred years after
-the Father of English poetry is said to have lived here. For, if we
-could believe the life of Chaucer prefixed to the Black Letter Folio of
-1598, both he and Gower, the poet, were members of the Inner Temple.
-‘For not many years since Master Buckley did see a record in the same
-house, where Geoffrey Chaucer was fined two shillings for beating a
-Franciscan Friar in Fleet Street.’ Master Buckley was Chief Butler of
-the Inner Temple (1564), and as such performed the functions of
-Librarian. He may, therefore, quite well have seen a record to this
-effect. But there is no reason to identify this Chaucer with the poet.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_106" id="page_106"></a>{106}</span></p>
-
-<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VI" id="CHAPTER_VI"></a>CHAPTER VI<br /><br />
-<small>LINCOLN’S INN AND THE DEVIL’S OWN</small></h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">It</span> was probably the removal of the Knights Templars to the New Temple
-that gave rise to the construction of New Street. Some thoroughfare
-connecting their old property in Holborn with their new premises and the
-river was necessary to their convenience and their trade. Thus, probably
-through their instrumentality, New Street, or, as we now call it,
-Chancery Lane, came into existence, and, connecting two of the main
-arteries leading from the western suburbs into the City, and cutting
-through the very heart of the area occupied by the Inns of Court, it
-soon developed into what Leigh Hunt described as ‘the greatest legal
-thoroughfare in England.’<a name="FNanchor_48_48" id="FNanchor_48_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_48" class="fnanchor">[48]</a> Chancery Lane, or Chancellor’s Lane, as
-the name appears in its earlier form, is said to have been called after
-a Bishop of Chichester, who was Chancellor of England at the end of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_107" id="page_107"></a>{107}</span>
-thirteenth century. A house and garden, near the southern end of
-Chancery Lane, was, we know, the town residence of the Bishops of
-Chichester. Here dwelt St. Richard, Bishop of Chichester (1245-1253),
-‘in true possession thereof in right of his Church of Chichester.’ The
-name of Chichester Rents perpetuated the memory of this episcopal
-habitation. Possession of this town residence of the Bishops of
-Chichester was finally acquired by the lawyers about the middle of the
-sixteenth century. A few years later (1580) they obtained the freehold
-of the open space known as Coney Garth, or Cotterell’s Garden. But it is
-not at all clear how the Society of Lincoln’s Inn came into occupation
-of these premises, or how its name had come to be attached to property
-properly belonging to the See of Chichester and St. Giles’s Hospital. In
-the absence of any other obvious explanation, we must look back for the
-origin of the Society of Lincoln’s Inn to a group of lawyers housed in
-an Inn belonging to the Earl of Lincoln, and must try to account for
-their presence on their present property by the theory of a migration
-from their first hostel. This theory fortunately presents no difficulty,
-and it is supported by various facts and indications.</p>
-
-<p>The parent house of Lincoln’s Inn would appear<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_108" id="page_108"></a>{108}</span> to be the Inn of the
-great Justiciar Henry de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, which stood to the
-south-east of St. Andrew’s Church. It was natural and necessary for the
-great Administrators of the Law to gather about their Courts a following
-of trained lawyers to help them to enunciate the theory, and to perform
-the business thereof. As the followers of Le Scrope, the great Justice
-of King’s Bench, settled in Scrope’s Inn, and the followers of De Grey,
-the Justiciar of Chester, in Grey’s Inn, so about the residence of the
-great Justice Henry de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, in his Manor of Holborn,
-congregated the forerunners of the Society of Lincoln’s Inn, students of
-law and practisers in the Justiciar’s Court.</p>
-
-<p>The hostel of the Earl of Lincoln stood at the north end of Shoe Lane,
-near Holeburn Bridge. The buildings were erected upon the ruins of the
-Monastery of the Blackfriars. The Blackfriars had settled themselves in
-Holborn, west of the north end of Chancery Lane, and gradually amassed
-property that reached down to the house of the Bishops of Chichester.
-But presently they followed the example of the Knights Templars, and
-moved nearer the River to the site of what is still called Blackfriars,
-just within the City Wall. Their<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_109" id="page_109"></a>{109}</span> Holborn property they sold a few years
-later (1286) to the Earl of Lincoln, who undertook to pay 550 marks, in
-instalments, to the Friars, ‘for all their place, buildings and
-habitation near Holeborn.’<a name="FNanchor_49_49" id="FNanchor_49_49"></a><a href="#Footnote_49_49" class="fnanchor">[49]</a></p>
-
-<p>Now, of Henry, Earl of Lincoln, tradition says that he developed his new
-estate by cultivating the gardens and orchards upon it, and that he made
-large sums by selling the fruit grown there. But it was, no doubt, to
-the labours of the former monkish owners, the preceding Blackfriars,
-that the gardens and orchards of the Earl of Lincoln owed their so rich
-and wonderful harvests.</p>
-
-<p>Lincoln, it is said, had so great a love for Lawyers that his house was
-filled with students of the Law. He had already arranged, according to
-this tradition, to transfer his house to them entirely, when, in 1311,
-he died. Such, according to Dugdale, was the story current ‘among the
-antients here.’ This tradition represents the fact that the Justiciar
-gathered about him a nucleus of men conversant with the Law, who should
-be capable of transacting the business of his Court, and who would
-naturally make it part of their<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_110" id="page_110"></a>{110}</span> business to train others to their
-trade. Equally naturally such Lawyers of Lincoln’s Inn would, in
-accordance with the almost invariable custom of medieval times, form
-themselves into a Guild, the Society of Lincoln’s Inn. It is probable,
-then, that the students ‘apt and eager,’ whom the Earl had gathered
-about him, formed themselves into the very Society which still exists,
-though it has changed its habitation. That change did not take place
-immediately after the Earl of Lincoln’s death. Through Lincoln’s
-daughter and heiress, Alesia, all his property passed to Thomas, Earl of
-Lancaster. The great quantities of wax and parchment recorded, among his
-household expenses,<a name="FNanchor_50_50" id="FNanchor_50_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50_50" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> as used in his Hostel at Shoe Lane, would seem
-to indicate that the legal business was still carried on here in 1314.
-Before entering upon the inheritance of Alesia, the Earl of Lancaster
-had already acquired the property of the Knights Templars, which
-included not only the New Temple, but also nearly the whole of the
-western side of New Street or Chancery Lane. Upon the attainder of the
-Earl of Lancaster in 1321, all his property, including Lincoln’s Inn in
-Shoe Lane, became the escheat of the King. This was subsequently
-restored<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_111" id="page_111"></a>{111}</span> to Alesia, who was known as Countess of Lincoln.</p>
-
-<p>The business of the Law had by this time become centred round Chancery
-Lane, and the Society of Old Lincoln’s Inn may well have deemed it
-desirable to migrate southwards. In such case it would be natural to
-find them settling upon a site which was likewise part of the property
-of the Earldom afterwards the Duchy, of Lancaster.</p>
-
-<p>Once in full possession of their property, the Lawyers turned with great
-energy to the business of building. They began to enclose their domain
-with lofty brick walls. The great Gateway, a Hall, a Library, and a
-Chapel were begun in the reign of Henry VII. The material chosen was the
-native red brick of London, so admirably suited to the Town, and the
-style adopted was that Tudor treatment of brick so admirably suited to
-the material. The Lawyers were guided in their choice, no doubt, by the
-possession of a Brick-field in the Coney Garth (= Searle’s Court, now
-New Square).</p>
-
-<p>One of the chief features of Lincoln’s Inn is the Tudor Gateway, which
-forms the main entrance into Chancery Lane. The liberality of Sir Thomas
-Lovell, one of the Benchers of the Society, and Treasurer of the
-Household of Henry VII., was<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_112" id="page_112"></a>{112}</span> chiefly responsible for its erection. This
-magnificent Gatehouse, with its flanking Towers of brick, built in 1518,
-whilst Wolsey was Chancellor, narrowly escaped destruction, in obedience
-to the imperious will of Lord Grimthorpe and his Gothic followers.</p>
-
-<p>Fortunately it has survived, and, with the exception of the magnificent
-Gatehouses of Lambeth Palace and St. James’s Palace, remains almost
-alone as a specimen of this period of architecture in London, when the
-Gothic was yielding place to the Palladian style.</p>
-
-<p>The walls of the massive tower, four stories high, are striped with
-diagonal lines of darker brick. The entrance, under an obtusely-pointed
-arch, was originally vaulted. The groining has disappeared, but the
-front still bears, in a heraldic compartment over the arch, the arms of
-Henry VIII. within the Garter, and crowned, having on the dexter side
-the purple lion of Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, and on the sinister the arms
-and quarterings of Sir Thomas Lovell.</p>
-
-<p>The bricks of which this Gatehouse and the outer wall of Lincoln’s Inn
-are built have an interest beyond their colour and their age. For upon
-the task of laying them ‘Rare Ben Jonson’<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_113" id="page_113"></a>{113}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_012" id="ill_012"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 347px;">
-<a href="images/ill_013_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_013_sml.jpg" width="347" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">OLD SQUARE, LINCOLN’S INN</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">Showing</span> the interior side of the gateway, built in 1518. Ben Jonson
-worked as a bricklayer on this gatehouse.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">is said to have laboured, trowel in hand and book in pocket. Aubrey, in
-his ‘Lives,’ records that Ben Jonson worked some time with his
-father-in-law, a bricklayer, ‘and particularly on the garden wall of
-Lincoln’s Inne, next to Chancery Lane.... A bencher, walking thro’ and
-hearing him repeat some Greeke verses out of Homer, and finding him to
-have a wit extraordinary, gave him some exhibition to maintain him at
-Trinity College in Cambridge.’ This is only a tradition, though a very
-likely one; and, as Leigh Hunt says, tradition is valuable when it helps
-to make such a flower grow out of an old wall.</p>
-
-<p>Within the Gatehouse a small Quadrangle is formed by the Chapel, Old
-Library, and the two wings of Old Buildings. Octagonal turret-staircases
-fill the corners of these brick buildings, and in the turret at the
-South-East corner lived Thurloe, who was Secretary of State to Oliver
-Cromwell. A tablet in Chancery Lane, on the outer face of the building,
-records this fact, whilst the Treasurership of William Pitt in 1794 is
-apparently thought so little worthy of memorial that the sundial which
-once commemorated it has been allowed to disappear.<a name="FNanchor_51_51" id="FNanchor_51_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51_51" class="fnanchor">[51]</a> A portrait by
-Gainsborough<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_114" id="page_114"></a>{114}</span> of that great Statesman hangs in the Benchers’ Room.
-Tradition has it that Oliver Cromwell once had chambers in Lincoln’s
-Inn, an idea which probably sprang from the fact that Richard Cromwell
-was a student here in 1647.</p>
-
-<p>The brick buildings forming this Court within the Gatehouse were
-constructed during James’s reign, and it was then decided to build ‘a
-fair large chapel, with three double chambers under the same,’<a name="FNanchor_52_52" id="FNanchor_52_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52_52" class="fnanchor">[52]</a> in
-place of the one then standing, which had grown ruinous, and was no
-longer large enough for the Society. This older chapel, which did not
-stand on precisely the same site, was dedicated to St. Richard of
-Chichester. The new chapel was raised on arches, which form in
-themselves a tiny cloister, and produce a pleasing and unexpected effect
-amid these dusty purlieus of the Law.</p>
-
-<p>The Chapel of Lincoln’s Inn, which was designed, according to Dugdale,
-by Inigo Jones, in his Gothic manner, and in which Dr. Donne, the witty
-prelate and great poet, preached the first sermon on Ascension Day,
-1623, suffered even more than the Church of the Templars at the hands of
-the destructive Gothic Revivalists. The Chapel was needlessly enlarged.
-The buttresses<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_115" id="page_115"></a>{115}</span> were stuccoed. The beautiful proportions, which Inigo
-Jones, like all the truly great architects, knew how to impart to his
-buildings, were wantonly and inexcusably destroyed.</p>
-
-<p>John Donne had entered as a law student at Lincoln’s Inn, and, after
-taking Orders, he was appointed preacher to the Inn. Before this, when
-Secretary to Lord Keeper Egerton, he had been secretly married to Anne,
-Lady Egerton’s niece. Ruin stared him in the face when, on discovery of
-the marriage, he was dismissed. With a characteristic ‘conceit’ he ‘sent
-a sad letter to his wife,’ as Walton<a name="FNanchor_53_53" id="FNanchor_53_53"></a><a href="#Footnote_53_53" class="fnanchor">[53]</a> says, ‘and signed it John
-Donne, Anne Done, Un-done.’</p>
-
-<p>Having taken Orders at the instance of King James, he was soon
-afterwards ‘importuned by the grave Benchers of Lincoln’s Inn, who were
-once the companions and friends of his youth, to accept of their
-lecture.’ Before he finally left the Inn to be Dean of St. Paul’s, he
-laid the foundation-stone of the new Chapel, and at the consecration
-ceremony, 1623, Ascension Day, he preached a sermon on the text, ‘And it
-was at Jerusalem, the feast of the dedication, and it was winter.’ So
-great was the throng of listeners that ‘two or three<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_116" id="page_116"></a>{116}</span> were endangered
-and taken up dead for the time with the extreme press.’ But Donne, great
-preacher as he was, lives, not by his sermons, but by his poems and by
-the Life with which the pen of Izaak Walton conferred immortality upon
-him.</p>
-
-<p>Like the Master of the Temple, the Chaplain of Lincoln’s Inn presides
-over the Chapel and attends in Hall during term-time. A Preachership was
-instituted in 1581, and the office has been filled by such men as
-Reginald Heber, Bishop of Calcutta and hymnologist, and Thomson,
-Archbishop of York. Amongst earlier Preachers may be mentioned Herring
-(1726), afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury, and Warburton (1746),
-Bishop of Gloucester, who founded the Warburton Lectures on Religion,
-which are annually delivered in the Chapel.</p>
-
-<p>The old coloured glass, representing Old Testament figures and the
-Twelve Apostles, made by Hall, of Fetter Lane, but probably designed by
-the Flemish artist, Bernard van Linge, is very good. It is contemporary
-with the original building, and was paid for by subscribers, who
-included in their number Noy, the Attorney-General, and Southampton and
-Pembroke, the friends of Shakespeare.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_117" id="page_117"></a>{117}</span></p>
-
-<p>In the Vaults lie Prynne, whose grave is unmarked, and the youthful
-daughter of the great Lord Brougham (1839), the only woman ever buried
-here. Lord Wellesley composed a Latin epitaph to grace her tomb. It has
-no great merit as a composition.</p>
-
-<p>The Old Hall stands at right angles to the Chapel. Older than the
-Gatehouse itself, it has been quite ruined by frequent alterations,
-restorations, and by hideous plastering. It was stuccoed by Bernasconi
-about the year 1800. ‘The Loover or Lanthorn,’ according to the Records
-of the Society, was ‘set up in the sixth of Edward VI.’</p>
-
-<p>That the same customs obtained in Lincoln’s Inn as in the other Inns,
-and were celebrated in this Hall, is indicated by an order of the
-Society during the reign of Henry VIII., that the ‘King of Cockneys on
-Childermass Day should sit and have due service; and that he and all his
-officers should use honest manner and good order, without any waste or
-destruction making, in wine, brawn, chely, or other vitails ... and that
-Jack Straw and all his adherents should be banisht and no more be used
-in this House.’</p>
-
-<p>It was in this Hall that the Lord Chancellor used to sit and hold his
-Court, under a picture by<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_118" id="page_118"></a>{118}</span> Hogarth of ‘S. Paul before Felix’ (1750),
-before the new Law Courts were built.</p>
-
-<p>Adjoining the Hall, on the South side, was the Library. The building is
-now let out in chambers. This Library was founded by John Nethersale, a
-member of the Society, who bequeathed forty marks to be spent on the
-building and on Masses for the repose of his soul (1497). Ever since, it
-has been increased, and, passing from Old Square to Stone Buildings, and
-from Stone Buildings to its present noble home, has grown in wealth and
-usefulness.</p>
-
-<p>Many of the volumes still retain the iron rings attached to their
-covers, by which, in old times, books in a Library were chained to the
-desks&mdash;as may be seen in the College and University Libraries at Oxford
-and Cambridge. The Library was further enriched by Sir Matthew Hale,
-Chief Justice, 1671, who bequeathed his MSS. to it.</p>
-
-<p>In 1787 the Library was moved to Stone Buildings, and finally to a noble
-building adjoining the New Hall, which Hardwick had just erected. The
-fair proportions of this building were unfortunately ruined by Sir
-Gilbert Scott, who, backed by Lord Grimthorpe, altered them to 130 feet
-by 40 feet. This new Library and the magnificent Hall adjoining<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_119" id="page_119"></a>{119}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_013" id="ill_013"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 344px;">
-<a href="images/ill_014_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_014_sml.jpg" width="344" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">THE NEW GATEWAY AND HALL OF LINCOLN’S INN</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">The</span> Hall was built in 1843, and opened by Queen Victoria on the occasion
-when Prince Albert was created a Bencher.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">it were erected in 1843 on the west side of that garden, where Ben
-Jonson is said to have laboured; and thus, whilst the southern half of
-the view into Lincoln’s Inn Fields was sacrificed by the Society, a
-beautiful site, amidst broad green stretches of lawns, shady trees, and
-flower-beds, was secured for their new blocks. Moreover, the Benchers
-took great and praiseworthy pains<a name="FNanchor_54_54" id="FNanchor_54_54"></a><a href="#Footnote_54_54" class="fnanchor">[54]</a> to procure a good design, which
-should harmonize with the existing buildings ‘in the style of the
-sixteenth century, before the admixture of Italian architecture.’<a name="FNanchor_55_55" id="FNanchor_55_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_55_55" class="fnanchor">[55]</a>
-The result of much deliberation and delay was a singularly successful
-design by Philip Hardwick, the architect who built the classical
-portions of Euston Station. Nobly proportioned, constructed of striped
-brick in the Tudor fashion, with stone dressings, so as to harmonize
-fitly with the Gatehouse opposite, and decorated with six bays, a
-projecting window at the north end, and a great south window, fine in
-detail and fine in its proportions, Lincoln’s Inn Hall is a building as
-distinguished as it is surprising, when we remember that it is a product
-of the year 1843.</p>
-
-<p>This Hall was opened with great ceremony by <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_120" id="page_120"></a>{120}</span>Queen Victoria, and upon
-that occasion Prince Albert was created a Bencher of the Inn. Within, as
-without, the Hall is superb; the proportions and the materials are
-excellent. The roof is elaborately carved, and ornamented with colour
-and gilt. The windows are rich in stained glass; the royal arms figure
-in the centre of the beautiful south window, the others are filled with
-old glass. In some directions, it must be confessed, the decoration is a
-trifle overdone, especially the heraldic decoration. The arms of the
-Inn, fifteen <i>fers de moline</i> on a blue ground, with the shield of Lacy
-‘or, a lion rampant purpure,’ are repeated with bewildering frequency in
-every material.</p>
-
-<p>Above the daïs is the great fresco ‘School of Legislation’ (1852). G. F.
-Watts had proposed to paint the larger hall of Euston Station, gratis,
-with a series of frescoes illustrating the ‘Progress of Cosmos.’ The
-Directors of the London and North-Western Railway fought shy of so
-unbusinesslike a proposal. Nor can it be said that they were not in some
-degree wise, for London atmosphere is by no means suitable for
-fresco-work. The work of art, which the Directors rejected, took shape
-upon the north wall of the Hall of Lincoln’s Inn. For the Benchers
-accepted a similar offer from Watts, and that generous-minded artist<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_121" id="page_121"></a>{121}</span>
-adorned their Hall with the greatest of English fresco-decorations:
-‘Justice, a Hemicycle of Law-givers,’ a group of legislators from Moses
-to Edward I. The painting has suffered sadly from the acids of the
-smoke-laden compost known as London air.</p>
-
-<p>The Benchers’ rooms, delightful sanctums that remind one of Oxford
-Common-rooms, contain some very fine portraits of distinguished members
-of the Inn: Chief Justice Rayner, by Soest; Pitt, by Gainsborough; Lord
-Erskine, by Sir Thomas Lawrence; and later portraits by Cope, Sargent,
-Watts and others, of Lord Davey, Lord Russell of Killowen, Sir Frank
-Lockwood, Lord Macnaghten, etc. The men famous in Law, in Letters, and
-in Politics, who have been members of Lincoln’s Inn, are too numerous to
-mention. Of lawyers, besides Lord Brougham, there are Murray, Lord
-Mansfield, Lord Chancellor, the Earl of Bathurst, and Lord Campbell.
-Canning, Perceval, Disraeli, Gladstone, Daniel O’Connell, William Penn,
-and William Prynne stand out among the makers of history who have been
-members of this Inn; whilst, among men of Letters, the George Colmans
-(father and son), Horace Walpole, Charles Kingsley, and George Wither,
-are amongst the most prominent,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_122" id="page_122"></a>{122}</span> though the latter produced his
-best-known poem in the Marshalsea Prison. And another shade, one may
-fancy, haunts the green fields of Lincoln’s Inn and the busy, muddy
-thoroughfare of Chancery Lane: it is that of Sir Thomas More, who passed
-from Oxford and New Inn to enter at Lincoln’s Inn in 1496, and was
-presently appointed Reader at Furnival’s Inn. Here, in the intervals of
-his political career, he made a very large income at the Bar.</p>
-
-<p>The south end of the Hall faces the garden, which is enclosed by the old
-houses of New Square. The fig-tree and the vine, like some stray
-survivals from the monkish vineyard, flourish against the soot-blackened
-bricks at the corner of these old houses, which, in pleasing calm and
-quiet dignity, surround the well-kept lawn and flower-beds. An empty
-basin in the centre of this garden marks the spot which was once adorned
-by a sun-dial and fountain, said to have been designed by Inigo Jones.
-By Inigo Jones were certainly designed the noble houses on the western
-side of the great green expanse of Lincoln’s Inn Fields&mdash;houses with
-‘Palladian walls, Venetian doors, grotesque roofs, and stucco floors.’ I
-believe some of these houses contain beautiful work in the ceilings,
-mantelpieces, etc.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_123" id="page_123"></a>{123}</span></p>
-
-<p>The whole Square, indeed, was ‘intended to have been built all in the
-same style and taste, but, unfortunately, not finished agreeable to the
-design of that great architect, because the inhabitants had not taste
-enough to be of the same mind, or to unite their sentiments for the
-public ornament and reputation’ (Herbert).</p>
-
-<p>Just as the Templars rented a field adjoining their buildings which they
-used for tilting, so, beyond the houses of Henry Lacy, Earl of Lincoln,
-and the Bishop of Chichester, lay a meadow, and beyond it again the
-Common, still known as Lincoln’s Inn Fields.</p>
-
-<p>Before 1602 there were no buildings on the north side of Lincoln’s Inn,
-and, so late as the reign of Henry VIII., so rural were the surroundings
-that rabbits abounded there, and had, indeed, to be preserved from the
-sporting proclivities of the students.</p>
-
-<p>In Great Turnstile and Little Turnstile we have the names of narrow
-lanes which still recall the days when Lincoln’s Inn Fields were fields
-indeed, and the Turnstiles gave access to a path which ran under the
-boundary wall of the Inn, and formed a short cut to the Strand.<a name="FNanchor_56_56" id="FNanchor_56_56"></a><a href="#Footnote_56_56" class="fnanchor">[56]</a> The
-enclosing of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_124" id="page_124"></a>{124}</span> Fields with buildings caused much heart-burning among
-the Benchers and Students of Lincoln’s Inn, and in 1641 the Society
-presented a petition to Parliament, complaining of the great increase of
-buildings in their neighbourhood, and ‘the loss of fresh air which the
-petitioners formerly enjoyed.’ But Parliament turned a deaf ear to the
-stifling Lawyers, and the building went on unchecked. A century later
-Gay, in his ‘Trivia,’ recounted the dangers of the neighbourhood:</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘Where Lincoln’s Inn’s wide space is railed around,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Cross not with venturous step; there oft is found<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">The lurking thief; who while the daylight shone,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Made the wall echo with his begging tone:<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">That crutch which late compassion moved, shall wound<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Thy bleeding head, and fell thee to the ground.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>No. 13, Lincoln’s Inn Fields is one of the most fascinating, as it is
-one of the richest, of the smaller museums that I know. It is the house
-of an architectural and artistic genius, filled with the treasures he
-collected, amidst which he loved to live and work. It is preserved for
-us as he left it. For this is the home which Sir John Soane built for
-himself, and in which he died, at the age of eighty-three, in 1837,
-bequeathing his house and treasures to be preserved as a trust for the
-Public,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_125" id="page_125"></a>{125}</span> and more especially for Amateurs and Students in Painting,
-Sculpture, and Architecture.</p>
-
-<p>Sir John Soane started life as an office boy at Reading; he was the
-Architect of the Bank of England and the Dulwich Galleries; he
-surrounded himself with a school of young architects, and for their
-instruction and his own delight ransacked Europe for treasures of art,
-both antiques and of his own day. The scope of this Collection is as
-striking as its very high level of excellence. Chippendale furniture,
-French fifteenth-century glass, a noble architectural library, and many
-historical curios&mdash;these are the least of the lovely things he has given
-to us. Beautiful bronzes and Greek and Etruscan vases are balanced by
-the work of Wedgwood and Flaxman; superb illuminated manuscripts by the
-exquisite Mercury of Giovanni di Bologna, and curious ancient gems, upon
-one of which a head is cut so cunningly that whichever way you turn its
-gaze follows you. We pass from the marvellous alabaster tomb of Seti I.,
-King of Egypt about 1370 <small>B.C.</small>, and Greek and Roman sculptured marbles,
-to a room in which first editions of ‘Paradise Lost’ and ‘Robinson
-Crusoe’ confront Tasso’s manuscript, Reynolds’ sketch-book, and the
-folios of Shakespeare’s plays which<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_126" id="page_126"></a>{126}</span> Boswell possessed. And yet we have
-taken no account of the pictures&mdash;of Sir Joshua Reynolds’ ‘Snake in the
-Grass,’ of Canaletto’s ‘Venice’ and Turner’s ‘Van Tromp’s Barge,’ of
-Watteau’s ‘Les Noces,’ of Raffael’s Cartoons&mdash;of a score of pictures and
-portraits by first-rate artists; and yet there remains that wonderful
-little room, which is lined by the masterpieces of Hogarth&mdash;‘The
-Election Scenes’ and the ‘Rake’s Progress.’ It is a wonderful place,
-this London, in which such a treasure-house can lie, unnoticed and
-almost unvisited, in the centre of an old square in the City.</p>
-
-<p>It is somewhat outside the scope of this book to deal with the dwellers
-in Lincoln’s Inn Fields, but mention may be made of Thomas Campbell, the
-poet, who had chambers at No. 61, whilst No. 58 was the House of
-Forster, the biographer of Dickens, which is described in ‘Bleak House’:
-‘Formerly a house of State ... in these shrunken fragments of its
-greatness lawyers lie, like maggots in nuts.’</p>
-
-<p>More fascinating than all is that ‘Old Curiosity Shop’ which still
-survives upon a tiny triangular plot amidst the ruin of tenements that
-have been lately razed to the ground. It proclaims itself the house
-immortalized by Dickens, and may very<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_127" id="page_127"></a>{127}</span> well have been the shop which
-suggested to him the scene of his ‘Old Curiosity Shop.’ It is an ancient
-building&mdash;an old red-tiled cottage, possibly as old as those superb
-houses of Inigo Jones, ornamented with the Rose of England and the
-Fleur-de-Lys of France, on the west side of Lincoln’s Inn Fields, which
-were put up a year before Charles laid his head upon the block in
-Whitehall.</p>
-
-<p>A legend, however, says that it is of later date, a relic of a dairy
-once belonging to that famous Louise Renée de Perrincourt de
-Queronaille, favourite of Charles II., who was created by him Duchess of
-Portsmouth. Portsmouth House stood opposite, and was believed to have
-been purchased by the Duchess from the proceeds of a ship and cargo
-presented to her by King Charles. But whether this was so or not, and
-whether the little shop in question is the actual begetter of Dickens’s
-vision, we cannot say with certainty. We need at least say nothing to
-discourage the belief which guides the feet of the lover of Dickens to
-Portsmouth Street, there to purchase souvenirs and conjure up the vision
-of the dark little shop, with its low ceiling and odd, unexpected
-corners, once more littered with knick-knacks and second-hand furniture
-in all stages of breakage and decay,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_128" id="page_128"></a>{128}</span> and little Nell and her tender old
-grandfather sitting there again in the candlelight.<a name="FNanchor_57_57" id="FNanchor_57_57"></a><a href="#Footnote_57_57" class="fnanchor">[57]</a></p>
-
-<p>It remains to mention the Northern wing of Lincoln’s Inn, the
-rectangular Court which lines Chancery Lane on the one side and faces
-the green sward of the Garden on the other. ‘The Terrace walk,’ says
-Herbert (p. 301) truly enough, ‘forms an uncommonly fine promenade ...
-and the gardens themselves, adorned with a number of fine, stately
-trees, receive a sort of consequence from the grandeur of the adjoining
-pile.’ This is Stone Building, and is the outcome of a design to rebuild
-the whole Inn in 1780 in the Palladian style. The design was not carried
-out, and even this section of the undertaking remained incomplete for
-sixty years. Even now much of the building is of brown brick. In 1845
-Hardwick, who was then carrying out his fine Gothic design for the Hall,
-completed the façade commenced by Sir Robert Taylor. The fine Corinthian
-pilasters of freestone, the simple pediments, and the chaste greys and
-pearly whites of the plain stone, thrown into strong relief by the
-soot-blackened portions of the building where it is not exposed to the
-cleansing effect of wind and rain, render this nobly-proportioned<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_129" id="page_129"></a>{129}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_014" id="ill_014"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 350px;">
-<a href="images/ill_015_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_015_sml.jpg" width="350" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">STONE BUILDINGS, LINCOLN’S INN, FROM THE GARDENS</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">Commenced</span> in 1780 as part of a great scheme of rebuilding the whole Inn
-in the Palladian style. The illustration shows the so-called ‘Pitt’
-sundial.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Court delightful to the eye, and, contrasting with the warm reds of the
-other buildings in Lincoln’s Inn, convince one, if one needs convincing,
-that red-brick and Portland stone are the only materials suitable for
-London architecture.</p>
-
-<p>In the Eastern wing of Stone Buildings is the Drill Hall of the Inns of
-Court Volunteers, and here are preserved various memorials of the many
-Volunteer Associations which have been connected with the Inns of Court.</p>
-
-<p>So far back as the time of the Spanish Armada an armed force was raised
-amongst the barristers and officers of the Inns for the defence of the
-country.</p>
-
-<p>A copy of the original deed of this association of lawyers to resist the
-threatened invasion (1584), relating to Lincoln’s Inn, hangs in the
-Drill Hall. The original is still in possession of the Earl of
-Ellesmere, whose ancestor, Thomas Egerton, then Solicitor-General and
-afterwards Chancellor, was the first to sign it.</p>
-
-<p>Upon the arrest of the Five Members in 1642, five hundred warlike
-Lawyers marched down to Westminster to express their determination to
-protect their Sovereign, Charles I.</p>
-
-<p>Upon the outbreak of the Civil War, Charles, who from the beginning of
-his reign had always<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_130" id="page_130"></a>{130}</span> encouraged the Benchers and Students to exercise
-themselves in arms and horsemanship, granted a commission to Edward,
-Lord Lyttleton, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, to raise a regiment of
-infantry from ‘the Gentlemen of the Inns of Court and Chancery.’
-Lyttleton died of a chill contracted whilst drilling his recruits, and
-was succeeded by Chief Justice Heath. A regiment of foot ‘for the
-security of the Universitie and Cittie of Oxford,’ and a regiment of
-cavalry ‘very fine and well-horsed,’ to guard the King’s person, did not
-exhaust the fighting capacity of the Lawyers, for the majority of the
-Bar, who saw the real issue at stake in the country, sided with the
-Parliament. Bulstrode Whitelock, Lieutenant-General Jones, and
-Commissary Ireton were Gentlemen of the Robe, who rose to eminence in
-the service of the Commonwealth. John Hampden, we have seen, was a
-member of the Inner Temple; Oliver St. John was a member of Lincoln’s
-Inn, and so, too, tradition says, was Oliver Cromwell, who, when Captain
-of the Slepe Troop of the Essex Association, occupied chambers in the
-old Gatehouse here.</p>
-
-<p>Dugdale quotes some orders that were drawn up, in the reign of King
-James, for establishing ‘the Company of the Inns of Court and Chancery<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_131" id="page_131"></a>{131}</span>
-in their exercises of Military Discipline,’ among which was the wise
-provision that ‘if anyone be a common swearer, or quarreller, he shall
-be cashiered.’ The number was limited to 600, and ‘It is intended that
-no Gentlemen are to be enjoyned to exercise in this kind, but such as
-shall voluntarily offer themselves, to be tolerated to do it at their
-own voluntary charge.’ The officers were to be chosen by their Captain;
-every House to give their own Gentlemen their rank, and the priority of
-the Houses to be decided by chance of dice.</p>
-
-<p>During the rising of the Young Pretender in ’45, Chief Justice Willes
-raised a regiment ‘for the defence of the King’s person.’ The occasion
-for arms passed away quickly, and it was not till 1780 that the
-barristers and students found themselves compelled once more to meet
-force by force. For the Gordon Rioters, after sacking Lord Mansfield’s
-house in Lincoln’s Inn Fields, set fire to a distillery belonging to a
-papist, near Barnard’s Inn, and the gutters of Holborn ran with blazing
-spirit, of which the rioters drank until they died. It was to escape the
-fury of the mob that John Scott, afterwards Lord Eldon, escorted his
-lovely young wife from his house in Carey Street to the Middle Temple,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_132" id="page_132"></a>{132}</span>
-of which he was a member. Her dress was torn, her hat lost, and her hair
-dishevelled by the violence of the rioters. ‘The scoundrels have got
-your hat, Bessie,’ cried the gallant husband, who had made a runaway
-match with her, ‘but never mind, they have left you your hair!’</p>
-
-<p>So long as the riots continued, the Lawyers kept armed watch in the
-Halls of their respective Societies. At the Inner Temple the mob forced
-the gate, ‘and would no doubt have plundered and burnt the place as Wat
-Tyler’s followers did four centuries before, had not a sergeant of the
-Guards, who acted as military instructor to the law-gentlemen, called
-out to the armed Templars: “Take care no gentleman fires from behind!”
-The rioters, fearing that some ambush had been prepared for them, took
-to their heels and never again molested this sanctuary of the law. In
-and around Gray’s Inn, a similar armed watch kept the ‘No Popery’ people
-at bay, and many years later Sir Samuel Romilly used to point out the
-gate where, musket in hand, he had stood sentry during some of the worst
-nights of the riots. The Lincoln’s Inn students, it seems&mdash;or, as
-another account says, those of the Temple&mdash;would have joined the
-military in repressing the riots, but were told by<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_133" id="page_133"></a>{133}</span> one of the officers
-in command that he did not wish ‘to see his own men shot!’<a name="FNanchor_58_58" id="FNanchor_58_58"></a><a href="#Footnote_58_58" class="fnanchor">[58]</a></p>
-
-<p>After the French Revolution, at the first rumour of invasion by the
-armies of the Republic, companies of Volunteers were recruited from
-Lincoln’s Inn and the Temple. Two corps appear to have been formed&mdash;one
-known as the Bloomsbury and Inns of Court Association, and the other the
-Legal Association. The Lincoln’s Inn Corps was commanded by Sir William
-Grant, then Master of the Rolls, who had seen service in Canada, at the
-Siege of Quebec. The Temple Companies were commanded by Lord Erskine,
-who had served in the Royal Navy before he took to the Law.</p>
-
-<p>Embodied in 1803, the Gentlemen of the Inns of Court took part in the
-grand Review of Volunteers in Hyde Park before the King. When the Temple
-Companies defiled before King George III., His Majesty asked Lord
-Erskine, who commanded them, who they were. ‘They are all lawyers, sir,’
-said Erskine. ‘What! what!’ exclaimed the King. ‘All lawyers? Then call
-them the Devil’s Own!’</p>
-
-<p>Many amusing stories are told of the Lawyer Volunteers&mdash;how Erskine used
-to read the word of command from the back of a paper like a brief,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_134" id="page_134"></a>{134}</span> and
-how Lord Eldon and Lord Ellenborough had to be dismissed for sheer
-inability to learn the ‘goose-step.’ And it was said that when the word
-‘charge’ was given, every member of the Corps produced a note-book and
-forthwith wrote down six and eightpence! Such was the origin of the
-subsequent Volunteer Corps, which, when the Volunteer movement came
-again to the front in the crisis of 1859, was enrolled as the 23rd
-Middlesex&mdash;a title afterwards changed to the 14th Middlesex. Upon the
-standard of this Inns of Court Volunteer Corps it was proposed to
-inscribe the appropriate phrase, ‘Retained for the Defence.’ Its popular
-title, the Devil’s Own, which it still keeps, is inherited from George
-III.’s witticism&mdash;if it was indeed his&mdash;anent the Legal Association.</p>
-
-<p>For the South African War some forty men were selected from the Inns of
-Court for service with the specially raised City Imperial Volunteers,
-popularly known as the C.I.V. In the welter of War Office rearrangements
-the existence of the Devil’s Own has been almost miraculously preserved
-‘for the Defence.’ But, of course, its title has been altered. The 14th
-(Inns of Court) Middlesex Volunteer Rifle Corps has now become the 27th
-London Regiment.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_135" id="page_135"></a>{135}</span></p>
-
-<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VII" id="CHAPTER_VII"></a>CHAPTER VII<br /><br />
-<small>GRAY’S INN</small></h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">Beyond</span> Lincoln’s Inn, across Holborn&mdash;the road which takes its name from
-the burn that flowed through the hollow&mdash;lies Gray’s Inn, a great quiet
-domain, quadrangle upon quadrangle, with a large space of greensward
-enclosed within it.</p>
-
-<p>‘Nothing else in London,’ so Nathaniel Hawthorne noted, ‘is so like the
-effect of a spell as to pass under one of these archways and find
-yourself transported from the jumble, rush, tumult, uproar, as of an age
-of weekdays condensed into the present hour, into what seems an eternal
-Sabbath. It is very strange to find so much of ancient quietude right in
-the monster city’s very jaws&mdash;which yet the monster shall not eat
-up&mdash;right in its very belly indeed, which yet in all these ages it shall
-not digest and convert into the same substance as the rest of its
-bustling streets.’</p>
-
-<p>Yet the site of Gray’s Inn lies outside the City<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_136" id="page_136"></a>{136}</span> Boundary, and the
-Chambers, where Francis Bacon wrote, were set in a quiet spot amidst
-gardens, beyond which stretched Gray’s Inn Fields, intersected by the
-country roads of Holborn and Gray’s Inn Lane. The latter lane took the
-name of Theobald’s Road later, because it led to Theobalds in
-Hertfordshire, which was the favourite hunting seat of King James I. In
-these fields beyond Gray’s Inn Lord Berkeley’s hounds showed sport to
-the Gentlemen of the Inns of Court in the reign of Queen Mary.</p>
-
-<p>It is indeed difficult to realize and remember how small London was, how
-comparatively tiny even the ‘Great Wen,’ which moved Cobbett’s wrath and
-disgust, and how recent is the growth of that continuous monotony of
-streets, which have spread over the fields where our grandfathers shot
-snipe and partridges. Even at the beginning of the last century Gray’s
-Inn was a ‘private place in the suburbs,’ suitable for study, removed
-from the bustle of the City. ‘The moment the sun peeps out,’ wrote Sir
-Samuel Romilly from his Chambers in 1780, ‘I am in the country, having
-only one row of houses between me and Highgate and Hampstead.’</p>
-
-<p>There is a popular legend that Gray’s Inn derives<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_137" id="page_137"></a>{137}</span> its name from the
-Grey Friars, whose Church stood hard by. But this legend is not in any
-way supported by the probabilities. Gray’s Inn, in fact, was the Inn,
-<i>hospitium</i>, or dwelling-house of the Greys of Wilton. Its site was
-included in the Manor of Portpool, the name of which survives in
-Portpool Lane. The name of this Manor is derived from Port (= market or
-gate), and pool, just as in West Smithfield there was a pool called
-Horsepool.<a name="FNanchor_59_59" id="FNanchor_59_59"></a><a href="#Footnote_59_59" class="fnanchor">[59]</a> The ‘market-pool’ in question may have been that in the
-northern Courtyard of Staple Inn, or somewhere else on the property of
-the De Greys.</p>
-
-<p>A very large portion of the Hundred of Ossulston, in which Gray’s Inn
-lies, appears to have belonged to the Bishop and Canons of St. Paul’s,
-and from the Manor of Portpool an ancient prebend of St. Paul’s
-Cathedral takes its name.</p>
-
-<p>The exact date when the De Greys first came into possession of the Manor
-of Portpool is not certain. But Reginald de Grey died in 1308, according
-to an Inquisition taken after his death at ‘Purtpole,’ seized of a
-messuage and certain lands there, which he held of the Dean and Chapter
-of St. Paul, London, by rent, service, and suit.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_138" id="page_138"></a>{138}</span></p>
-
-<p>This Reginald de Grey was Justiciar of Chester, whose work would often
-bring him to the Capital. It is reasonable to suppose that his following
-of clerks and lawyers would, as in the case of the Earl of Lincoln, be
-resident in his London ‘Inn,’ and thus form the nucleus of what
-afterwards developed into a School, Guild, or Society of Lawyers.</p>
-
-<p>The Society of Gray’s Inn probably came into corporate existence some
-time in the fourteenth century. The exact date cannot, indeed, be
-determined. As in the case of the other Inns, the known surviving
-records are scanty. And this, perhaps, is due to the same cause.</p>
-
-<p>Fire wrought havoc in Gray’s Inn, as elsewhere, and the earliest
-archives of this Inn, as of the Temple, were probably destroyed at the
-end of the seventeenth century. In 1687 we learn that, ‘as they were in
-the midst of their revels and masquerades, a violent fire broke out,
-which destroyed most of the paper buildings that remained; several
-records are also lost and burnt or blown up.’</p>
-
-<p>Such early records as do exist of the Inn as a corporate institution in
-its early days do not amount to convincing evidence, but they do point
-to the existence of Gray’s Inn as an Inn of Court in the fourteenth
-century. A list of the Readers of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_139" id="page_139"></a>{139}</span> Inn, with their Arms, from the
-year 1359, compiled in the reign of Henry VIII. (Harleian MSS.), we may
-take for what it is worth. It is said that William Skipwith, a
-Serjeant-at-Law in 1355, belonged to Gray’s Inn, and was the first
-Reader. Again, in 1589, Sir Christopher Yelverton, in resigning his
-membership of Gray’s Inn, as it was compulsory for him to do on being
-appointed a Serjeant-at-Law, made a farewell speech to his brother
-members, stating that ‘I doe acknowledge myself deeplie and infinitely
-indebted unto this House for the singular and exceeding favours that I
-and myne ancestors have received in it ... <i>for two hundred years agoe
-at least</i> some of them lived here.’ This statement, if accurate, would
-prove the Inn to have been a corporate institution at least as early as
-1389. Again, we gather from the ‘Paston Letters’ that Sir William
-Byllyng, Chief Justice in 1464, told William Paston that he had been ‘a
-felaw in Gray’s Inn,’ and also mentioned one Ledam as a ‘felaw’ there.
-This is the first, and for many years the last, mention of any Fellows
-in Gray’s Inn. It may either be considered to be a confirmation of the
-view that the Lawyers’ Society was in possession in the fifteenth
-century, or merely a proof that Byllyng himself<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_140" id="page_140"></a>{140}</span> and Ledam were
-fellow-lodgers in some part of Lord Grey’s tenement. But there is, in
-fact, no indubitable mention of the Lawyers’ settlement here until the
-time of Henry VIII. However, the great-grandson of the Justiciar,
-Reginald de Wilton, leased out the <i>hospitium</i> in Pourtepole in 1343.
-And in 1370 Lord Grey de Wilton let ‘a certain Inn in Portepole’ for 100
-shillings. Stow, on the authority of one Master Saintlow Kniveton, says
-that gentlemen and professors of the Common Law were Lord Grey’s
-tenants. At any rate, before the end of the fourteenth century (1397)
-the records show that the Lords de Grey had enfeoffed others&mdash;who
-possibly represented the Society of the Inn&mdash;with the use of their
-property. Then, in 1506, Edmund, Lord de Grey, decided to part with it
-altogether. He was perhaps persuaded to adopt this course by the fact
-that the suburban villa of the De Greys was by this time already being
-swamped by the rising tide of houses that was flowing westward from the
-City. He sold to Hugh Denys and others ‘the Manor of Portpoole,
-otherwise called Gray’s Inn, four messuages, four gardens, the site of a
-windmill, eight acres of land, ten shillings of free rent, and the
-advowson of the Chantry of Portpoole aforesaid.’<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_141" id="page_141"></a>{141}</span></p>
-
-<p>The Manor presently escheated to the King, and licence was granted to
-the previous tenants to alienate to the House of Jesus of Bethlehem at
-Shene (<i>i.e.</i>, Richmond) in Surrey, both the Manor of Portepoole and the
-lands in the parish of St. Andrew of Holborn, and the advowson of the
-chantry pertaining thereto, to be held to the annual value of ten marks
-(£6 13s. 4d.). Then, in 1516, occurs the first distinct mention of a
-Society of Lawyers settled in these four messuages, with their gardens,
-windmill, and chapel. For an association consisting of two Serjeants and
-four Barristers, representatives of a Society of Students of Law, took
-out a lease in that year of the Manor of Portpool from the Prior and
-Convent of Shene at a rent of £6 13s. 4d. This lease was renewed, at the
-same rent, by Henry VIII. when, at the dissolution of the monasteries,
-the Inn, together with the whole of the Priory of Shene, passed into the
-hands of the Crown. The rent was commuted into a freehold by the
-Commissioners of the Commonwealth in 1651, upon payment of a heavy fine.
-It was resumed by Charles II., the sale being declared null and void,
-and was sold to Sir Philip Matthews. Gray’s Inn thenceforth paid the old
-rent to him and his heirs, until, in 1733, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_142" id="page_142"></a>{142}</span> Benchers bought the
-freehold of the property from them. It is now the absolute legal
-property of the Society of Gray’s Inn.</p>
-
-<p>By the reign of Queen Elizabeth, Gray’s Inn had risen into great
-popularity. The Inns of Court now formed one of the leading Universities
-of England&mdash;‘the noblest nurseries of humanity and liberty in the
-Kingdom,’ Ben Jonson declared. And chief among the Colleges of Law, with
-almost double the number of students in any other Inn, stood Gray’s Inn.
-The great Lord Burghley always refers to it with the deepest affection,
-mentioning it as ‘the place where myself came forthe unto service.’</p>
-
-<p>Its popularity, however, can hardly have been due to the luxuriousness
-of its chambers, which, we are told, were ‘disagreeably incommodious.’</p>
-
-<p>Dugdale remarks that there was ‘not much of beauty or uniformity’ in the
-buildings, ‘the structure of the more ancient having been not only very
-mean, but of so slender capacity that even the Ancients of this House
-were necessitated to lodge double’&mdash;as, for instance, in Henry VIII.’s
-day, Sir Thomas Nevile wrote to say that he would accept of Mr.
-Attorney-General to be his bedfellow in his Chamber there.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_143" id="page_143"></a>{143}</span></p>
-
-<p>In 1688, it appears, the Inn was divided into three Courts&mdash;Holborn,
-Coney, and Middle or Chapel Court. Coney and Chapel Courts were
-afterwards converted into Gray’s Inn Square&mdash;a title conferred upon them
-in 1793.</p>
-
-<p>Holborn Court must have included South Square and Field Court, the
-latter so called from its being a passage into the Red Lion Fields,<a name="FNanchor_60_60" id="FNanchor_60_60"></a><a href="#Footnote_60_60" class="fnanchor">[60]</a>
-where a Bowling-Green was laid out in the seventeenth century. When, at
-the close of that century, Dr. Barebone, the great builder, bought Red
-Lion Fields and began to build upon that site, ‘the Gentlemen of Graies
-Inn took notice of it, and thinking it an injury to them, went with a
-considerable body of 100 persons, upon which the workmen assaulted the
-gentlemen, and flung bricks at them, and the gentlemen at them again, so
-a sharp engagement ensued, but the gentlemen routed them at last.’<a name="FNanchor_61_61" id="FNanchor_61_61"></a><a href="#Footnote_61_61" class="fnanchor">[61]</a></p>
-
-<p>The principal entrance to Gray’s Inn was formerly from Gray’s Inn Lane.
-It was not till the end of the sixteenth century that, as Stow puts it,
-‘the Gentlemen of this House purchased a messuage<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_144" id="page_144"></a>{144}</span> and a curtillage
-situate upon the south side of this House, and thereupon erected a fayre
-gate and a gatehouse, for a more convenient and more honourable passage
-into the High Street of Holborne, whereof this house stood in much
-neede, for the former gates were rather posterns than gates.’</p>
-
-<p>By Gray’s Inn Gate, Jacob Tonson, Pope’s publisher, kept his shop before
-moving to Fleet Street. Soon after Holborn Gate was erected, the shop
-underneath was taken by another bookseller, one Henry Tomes by name,
-who, appropriately enough, published the first edition of Bacon’s
-‘Advancement of Learning.’</p>
-
-<p>The Entrance Gate from Holborn leads us from the throng and bustle of
-the streets, the din and rush of the City, and the noisome fumes of
-twopenny tubes and motor-buses, through a dull and narrow alley into
-South Square&mdash;a large, irregular quadrangle of pleasing, harmonious
-eighteenth-century houses. Opposite the entrance passage a detached
-block faces us (No. 10), containing the Common Room, admirably rebuilt
-in 1905. This is connected by an archway with the Hall, Chapel, and
-Library.</p>
-
-<p>The foundation of the Library has been<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_145" id="page_145"></a>{145}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_015" id="ill_015"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 343px;">
-<a href="images/ill_016_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_016_sml.jpg" width="343" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">A DOORWAY IN SOUTH SQUARE, GRAY’S INN</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">It</span> is one of several classic entrances of this type in the Square, and
-bears the date 1738.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">attributed to Francis Bacon, Lord Verulam. But references to it occur
-before 1576, the year in which he became a Member of the Inn.<a name="FNanchor_62_62" id="FNanchor_62_62"></a><a href="#Footnote_62_62" class="fnanchor">[62]</a> But it
-was not till 1737 that the need was felt for the erection of a building
-specially intended to house it. Then an Order was passed for building a
-Library in Holborn Court, now known as South Square. A hundred years
-later additions were made, and in 1883 a new Library building was added,
-which is entered separately from the internal angle of South Square, and
-which fronts externally upon the then newly-made Gray’s Inn Road. The
-Library boasts a small but valuable collection of manuscripts, including
-that of Bracton’s ‘De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliæ.’</p>
-
-<p>The old Hall was rebuilt in 1556. It follows the usual plan of a
-sixteenth-century Hall, having a raised dais and ‘high’ table at the
-east end, and the characteristic Tudor bay window on the north side. A
-very handsome oak screen, richly carved with Renaissance ornament, and
-divided into round arched bays by Ionic columns, conceals the vestibule.
-Above the enriched cartouche frieze of the Screen is an open and carved
-balustrade, extremely handsome, though of<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_146" id="page_146"></a>{146}</span> later date, which forms a
-front to the Minstrel Gallery. A glazed lantern in the centre of the
-Hall indicates the ancient louvre. A very fine open timber roof of the
-hammer-beam type covers this charming room, and harmonizes with the
-eighteenth-century oak panelling, which lines the walls, and is
-decorated with the arms of the Treasurers. A large traceried window over
-the Minstrel Gallery, five mullioned and transomed windows on the south
-side, and four similar windows, in addition to the large bay window, on
-the north, adequately light the Hall. Many of the windows contain fine
-heraldic glass, with escutcheons of famous members of the Society.<a name="FNanchor_63_63" id="FNanchor_63_63"></a><a href="#Footnote_63_63" class="fnanchor">[63]</a>
-On the walls of the Hall hang portraits of Kings Charles I. and II., and
-James II., Sir Nicholas Bacon and Francis Bacon, Viscount St. Albans,
-Baron Verulam, Lord Coke, Sir Christopher Yelverton (1602), Sir John
-Turton (1689), Lord Raymond, Chief Justice (1725), Sir James Eyre
-(1787), Sir John Hullock (1823), Stephen Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester,
-etc. But the chief treasure is the portrait of Queen Elizabeth, hung
-above the dais, which was presented to the Society by<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_147" id="page_147"></a>{147}</span> Henry Griffith,
-one of the Masters of the Bench.</p>
-
-<p>The exterior of the Hall was sadly ruined by the Goths, or Vandals, of
-1826. The walls and gables of dark red brick, ornamented with brick
-battlements, and relieved by labels and mullions of stone, were, like
-those of the Chapel, rendered hideous by the stucco madness of the age;
-mean modern battlements were added; slate was substituted for the warm
-red tiles of the old roof; and a wooden lantern of new and feeble design
-placed instead of the octangular wooden lantern, with a leaded cupola,
-which rose from the centre of the roof. More recently the stucco
-disfigurations have been removed, and the old red-brick buttresses and
-walls with the stone labels have been happily revealed again.</p>
-
-<p>There is a tradition in the Inn that the Screen which we have mentioned,
-and also some of the dining-tables now used in the Hall, were given to
-the Society by Queen Elizabeth. At dinner on Grand Day in each term ‘the
-glorious, pious, and immortal memory of good Queen Bess’ is still
-solemnly drunk in Hall. Certainly and happily this Hall, one of the most
-venerable and most beautiful of all the Halls in London, remains very<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_148" id="page_148"></a>{148}</span>
-much, as regards the interior, what it was in the days of the Virgin
-Queen.</p>
-
-<p>There is another legend which connects the name of good Queen Bess with
-this Hall. It is said that Her Majesty was present at the performance in
-Gray’s Inn Hall of the masque, ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream,’ under the
-stage management of Shakespeare. There is no intrinsic improbability
-about this. Though the Pension Book does not record any visit of
-Elizabeth to Gray’s Inn, the nature of the entries is such that omission
-therefrom cannot be said to prove the non-occurrence of an event.
-Francis Bacon, who was made a Bencher in 1586, and was elected Treasurer
-in 1590, was a <i>persona grata</i> at Court, and not only took a delight in
-the preparation of pageantries, but also knew Shakespeare well. It is,
-therefore, quite likely that Queen Elizabeth visited the Inn on the
-occasion of the production of a masque by Shakespeare.<a name="FNanchor_64_64" id="FNanchor_64_64"></a><a href="#Footnote_64_64" class="fnanchor">[64]</a> It is at
-least certain that in February, 1587, eight Members of Gray’s Inn,
-acting apparently with the approval of the Bench, produced a play called
-‘The Misfortunes of Arthur’ for the entertainment of Queen Elizaabeth<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_149" id="page_149"></a>{149}</span>
-at Greenwich while Her Majesty was visiting the fair. It was apparently
-in connection with this play that Bacon, being then Reader of Gray’s
-Inn, wrote to Lord Burleigh as follows: ‘There are a dozen gentlemen of
-Gray’s Inn that, out of the honour which they bear to your Lordship and
-my Lord Chamberlain, to whom at their last masque they were so much
-bounden, are ready to furnish a masque: wishing it were in their power
-to perform it according to their minds.’<a name="FNanchor_65_65" id="FNanchor_65_65"></a><a href="#Footnote_65_65" class="fnanchor">[65]</a></p>
-
-<p>The Benchers and Students of Gray’s Inn indulged in the Christmas
-<i>Saturnalia</i> of Masques and Revels with as great, or even greater, zest
-than the other Societies of Lawyers. And Bacon, philosopher, statesman,
-and courtier, was by no means backward in his enjoyment of ‘Masques and
-Triumphs.’ ‘These things are but toys,’ he wrote, ‘but since Princes
-will have such things, it is better they should be graced with elegancy
-than daubed with cost.’ And accordingly he devoted some of his abundant
-energy to superintending the festivities in his own Inn, and even to
-assisting in the composition of some of the ‘Triumphs.’</p>
-
-<p>As early as 1525 mention is made of a masque that was acted in the Hall
-here, which was <span class="pagenum"><a name="page_150" id="page_150"></a>{150}</span>composed by John Roo, Serjeant at the Law, and ‘sore
-displeased’ Cardinal Wolsey. George Gascoigne, the poet, a Member of the
-Inn, translated plays from the Greek (Euripides’ ‘Jocasta’&mdash;the
-‘Phœnissæ’?) and Italian for the students to act. And now, in 1594,
-there were high festivities at Gray’s Inn, when an extravaganza was
-produced bearing the significant title: ‘History of the High and Mighty
-Prince Henry, Prince of Purpoole [Portpool], Archduke of Stapulia
-[Staple’s Inn] and Bernarda [Barnard’s Inn], Duke of High and Nether
-Holborn, Marquis of St. Giles and Tottenham, Great Lord of the Cantons
-of Islington, Kentish Town, Paddington, and Knightsbridge, Knight of the
-most Heroical Order of the Helmet and Sovereign of the same; who reigned
-and died <small>A.D.</small> 1594.’ Owing to the Hall being overcrowded on the first
-night, the students of the Inner and Middle Temples quitted the Hall in
-dudgeon, and the performance of the main piece had to be adjourned. To
-make up for the withdrawal of ‘The History of Prince Henry’ from the
-playbill, it was thought ‘good not to offer anything of account saving
-Dancing and Revelling with Gentlewomen.... To eke out the programme
-Shakespeare’s “Comedy of Errors” was then played by the players.’<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_151" id="page_151"></a>{151}</span></p>
-
-<p>Thus Gray’s Inn Hall shares with the Hall of the Middle Temple the
-distinction of being the only buildings now remaining in London in
-which, so far as we know, any of the plays of Shakespeare were performed
-in his own time.<a name="FNanchor_66_66" id="FNanchor_66_66"></a><a href="#Footnote_66_66" class="fnanchor">[66]</a></p>
-
-<p>At Shrovetide the Prince of Purpoole and his company entertained Queen
-Elizabeth at Greenwich. After the performance Her Majesty ‘willed the
-Lord Chamberlain that the gentlemen should be invited on the next day,
-which was done, and her Majesty gave them her hand to kiss with most
-gracious words of commendation to them: particularly in respect of
-Gray’s Inn, as an House that she was much beholden unto for that it did
-always study for some Sports to present her with.’</p>
-
-<p>The success of this Masque was no doubt largely due to the fact that it
-was supposed to contain veiled allusions to many living persons of note,
-and that these allusions, uttered by the mimic Councillors of the
-Purpoole Court, were known to be written by the greatest of the sons of
-Gray’s Inn, Bacon himself. ‘The speeches of the six Councillors,’ says
-James Spedding, ‘carry his signature in every<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_152" id="page_152"></a>{152}</span> sentence.’<a name="FNanchor_67_67" id="FNanchor_67_67"></a><a href="#Footnote_67_67" class="fnanchor">[67]</a> That they
-were written by him, and by him alone, no one who is at all familiar
-with his style, either of thought or expression, will for a moment
-doubt.</p>
-
-<p>The Masque prepared by Francis Beaumont, to celebrate the marriage of
-the Count Palatine with the Princess Elizabeth, was performed before the
-King and Royal Family in the Banqueting House at Whitehall (February 20,
-1613), and Francis Bacon, it is recorded, then Solicitor-General,
-‘spared no time in the setting forth, ordering, and furnishing’ of it.</p>
-
-<p>On Twelfth Night, 1614, the ‘Maske of Flowers’ was presented ‘by the
-Gentlemen of Graies Inn’ in the same Banqueting Hall upon the occasion
-of the marriage of the Earl of Somerset. This Masque, when published,
-was dedicated to Sir Francis Bacon, who apparently bore the whole
-expense of the performance. In 1887 ‘The Masque of Flowers’ was revived,
-being again performed with great success in Gray’s Inn Hall. Other
-masques of this and later times are mentioned by Mr. Douthwaite (p. 234
-<i>et seq.</i>). Of the Masque performed by the Inns of Court before Charles
-I., which has been already referred to, ‘The Triumph<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_153" id="page_153"></a>{153}</span> of Peace,’ James
-Shirley, the dramatist, was the author. He had chambers in Gray’s Inn.</p>
-
-<p>The form of self-government that obtained at Gray’s Inn was very similar
-to that which the other Inns enjoyed.</p>
-
-<p>The Officer named Treasurer at other Inns was at Gray’s Inn known as the
-Pensioner. According to Sir Nicholas Bacon and some other Commissioners
-who drew up a report upon the Houses of Court for the information of
-Henry VIII., ‘a Pension, or, as some Houses call it, a Parliament,’ was
-summoned every quarter, or more if need be, ‘for the good ordering of
-the House, and the reformation of such things as seem meet to be
-reformed.’ These Pensions or Parliaments were ‘nothing else but a
-conference of Benchers and Utter Barristers only, and in some other
-Houses an Assembly of Benchers and such of the Utter Barristers and
-other ancient and wise men of the House as the Benchers have elected to
-them before time, and these together are named the Sage Company.’ This
-report does not mention the Ancients of Gray’s Inn. ‘The Grand Company
-of Ancients’ consisted of three classes&mdash;Barristers called by seniority
-to that degree; sons of Judges, who by right of inheritance were
-admitted Ancients; and<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_154" id="page_154"></a>{154}</span> persons of distinction who, in the words of
-Fortescue already quoted, were placed in the Inns of Court, not so much
-to make the Laws their study as to form their manners and to preserve
-them from the contagion of vice. The Constitution of the Inns, and the
-correct relation between the Benchers and Junior Members, were not
-arrived at without certain crises. The internal politics of the Houses
-were occasionally lively. Thus at the Middle Temple the right of the
-Benchers to regulate the affairs of the Inn, without reference to the
-Parliaments of barristers and students to whom, apparently, the right of
-self-government within certain limits was, by ancient custom, entrusted
-in the Vacations, was a ground of hot dispute in the seventeenth and
-eighteenth centuries. The right to hold a Parliament at any time was
-demanded. The Benchers replied that the Junior Members were only
-entitled to deliberate and represent on matters occurring in
-Vacation.<a name="FNanchor_68_68" id="FNanchor_68_68"></a><a href="#Footnote_68_68" class="fnanchor">[68]</a></p>
-
-<p>The Chapel of Gray’s Inn Loftie describes with equal brevity and justice
-as ‘ancient, but without interest.’</p>
-
-<p>In 1315 John, Lord Grey, had given lands in<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_155" id="page_155"></a>{155}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_016" id="ill_016"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;">
-<a href="images/ill_017_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_017_sml.jpg" width="500" height="372" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">GRAYS INN SQUARE</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">The</span> Hall (on the right) was rebuilt in 1556, and the chapel, covered
-with greenish stucco (in the centre), is ancient, but has suffered much
-from wholesale restorations.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">the manor to the Canons of St. Bartholomew, to endow a Chaplain.
-Chaplain and Chapel alike passed to the lawyers along with the Inn, and
-it is likely enough that the present old Chapel, in spite of plaster and
-bad stained glass, represents at heart the fourteenth-century Chapel of
-the Greys.</p>
-
-<p>The earliest mention of it in the existing records of the Society is in
-the eleventh year of Elizabeth. It was ‘beautified and renewed’ at the
-end of the seventeenth century, and received a blanket of stucco, a
-fringe of silly battlements, and an ugly slate roof in the first part of
-the nineteenth. Some armorial bearings, chiefly of the
-seventeenth-century Bishops and Archbishops, survive in the Eastern
-Window of five lights, but much of the painted glass mentioned by
-Dugdale has disappeared or been removed to the Hall.</p>
-
-<p>Beyond South Square stretches a delightful quadrangle of homogeneous
-houses, which contains a large gravelled centre, bordered by a few
-sickly plane-trees. This is Gray’s Inn Square, which, as we have seen,
-took the place of Coney Court and Chapel Court. It was at No. 1, Coney
-Court, burnt down in 1678, that Bacon, ‘the greatest, wisest, meanest of
-mankind,’ is said to have lived. The site of his rooms is covered now by
-No. 1,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_156" id="page_156"></a>{156}</span> Gray’s Inn Square, part of the row of buildings erected in 1868
-at the West end of this Court. In 1622 Bacon was granted chambers in the
-Inn consisting of ‘certayne buildings in Graies Inne [of late called
-Bacon’s Buildings] for the terme of fiftie years.’</p>
-
-<p>Francis Bacon was entered by his father, the Lord Keeper, on June 27,
-1576, together with his four brothers, Nicholas, Nathaniel, Edward, and
-Anthony. This was that Sir Nicholas who founded the Cursitor’s Office or
-Inn, from which Cursitor Street takes its name; Cursitor Street, with
-its bitter memories of sponging-houses and bailiffs, which have been
-improved away along with the lumbering machinery of the law that made
-such things possible. Sir Nicholas had been Treasurer of the Inn in
-1536. Francis Bacon, in the dedication quoted below, describes Gray’s
-Inn as ‘the place whence my father was called to the highest place of
-justice, and where myself have lived and had my proceedings, and
-therefore few men are so bound to their Societies by obligation both
-ancestral and personal as I am to yours.’ An Order in the following
-year, 1577, directed that all the sons of Sir Nicholas Bacon should be
-‘of the Grand Company and not be bound to any vacations.’ In the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_157" id="page_157"></a>{157}</span>
-twenty-eighth year of Elizabeth, Francis Bacon was advanced to the
-Readers’ Table. He was elected Treasurer in 1608.<a name="FNanchor_69_69" id="FNanchor_69_69"></a><a href="#Footnote_69_69" class="fnanchor">[69]</a> As
-Solicitor-General he dedicated his ‘Arguments of Law’ to ‘my lovinge
-friends and fellowes, the Readers, Ancients, Utter Barresters and
-Students of Graies Inn,’ signing himself ‘your assured loving friend and
-fellow, F. B.’</p>
-
-<p>It was from Gray’s Inn that the procession of Earls, Barons, Knights and
-Gentlemen started, which accompanied him to Westminster when he became
-Lord Keeper. And it was to Gray’s Inn that he returned after his
-impeachment and fall, coming ‘to lie at his old lodgings,’ and write
-many of his Treatises and Essays. ‘Those noble studies,’ says Macaulay,
-the brilliant historian, who himself occupied chambers at No. 8, South
-Square, in a building that was destroyed to make room for the extension
-of the Library&mdash;‘those noble studies, for which he had found leisure in
-the midst of professional drudgery and of courtly intrigues, gave to
-this last sad stage of his life a dignity beyond what power or titles
-could bestow. Impeached, convicted, sentenced, driven with ignominy
-from<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_158" id="page_158"></a>{158}</span> the presence of his Sovereign, shut out from the deliberations of
-his fellow-nobles, loaded with debt, branded with dishonour, sinking
-under the weight of years, sorrows and diseases, Bacon was Bacon still.’
-He commenced a Digest of the Laws of England, a History of England under
-the Tudors, a body of Natural History, a Philosophical Romance. ‘He made
-extensive and valuable additions to his Essays. He published the
-inestimable treatise, “De Augmentis Scientiarum.” The very trifles with
-which he amused himself in hours of pain and languor bore the marks of
-his mind. The best collection of jests in the world is that which he
-dictated from memory, without referring to any book, on a day on which
-illness had rendered him incapable of serious study.’ It is the brain
-and personality of such a genius that haunts this spacious, quiet square
-of Gray’s Inn. And presently we shall see how upon the Inn itself and
-its pleasaunces this many-sided mind impressed itself to our advantage.</p>
-
-<p>Through an arch in the far angle of the Square we pass to a narrow,
-oblong building of the crudest early nineteenth-century type, looking
-across an ugly wall upon the noisy Gray’s Inn Road. This is the ugly
-line of Verulam Buildings (1811), which<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_159" id="page_159"></a>{159}</span> Charles Lamb justly called
-‘accursed,’ for they encroached upon the gardens, ‘cutting out delicate
-crankles, and shouldering away one or two of the stately alcoves of the
-terrace.’ A postern-gate at the far corner leads out to the junction of
-Gray’s Inn Road with Theobald’s Road, a dismal thoroughfare, which is
-bounded by a railing, through which a delightful vista of green trees
-and turf gladdens the sight of the passer-by&mdash;turf and green trees which
-form the gracious playground of the children for whom the gates are
-opened each summer evening.</p>
-
-<p>Another Gateway by ‘Jockey Fields,’ in Theobald’s Road, leads past
-Raymond Buildings, the same kind of ugly, unabashed, stock-brick
-barracks as Verulam Buildings, and dating from the same period. Crude
-and unpleasing as these dull blocks are to behold, they have the great
-advantage of being very pleasant to live in, for they line and look out
-upon the Gardens which the great Philosopher laid out. Raymond Buildings
-end in Field Court, which in turn adjoins South Square. One side of
-Field Court is formed by the iron railings and fine iron Gateway (1723)
-which terminate the Gardens. Square stone gate-posts carry the Griffin
-of the Inn. For the device of<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_160" id="page_160"></a>{160}</span> Gray’s Inn is a Griffin, or, in a field
-sable. Within this Gate a broad avenue of plane-trees, flanked by grassy
-lawns and terraces, leads to a green earth-work terrace at the northern
-end of the gardens. This terrace was probably constructed with the
-intention of shutting out the view of the squalid houses that had begun
-to spring up in that direction.</p>
-
-<p>James Spedding records that Raleigh, just before his last disastrous
-voyage to the New World, had a long conversation with Bacon in those
-Gardens. And it is said that Bacon planted here a ‘catalpa tree,’ very
-likely brought home by Raleigh, which still survives, and is certainly
-one of the oldest in England. This is the sprawling, senile tree,
-tottering to its grave with the aid of a dozen propping sticks, which
-forms a striking feature upon the left-hand side of the path, looking
-from the Gateway.</p>
-
-<p>Bacon’s love of gardening is breathed in every line of his delightful
-Essay upon Gardens. ‘God Almighty first planted a garden. And indeed it
-is the purest of human pleasures. It is the greatest refreshment to the
-spirits of man, without which buildings and palaces are but gross
-handyworks.’ And it appears probable that the Gardens of Gray’s Inn were
-laid out under his direction in 1597 and<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_161" id="page_161"></a>{161}</span> the following years. For in
-1597 the Society ordered ‘that the summe of £7 15s. 4d., due to Mr.
-Bacon for planting of trees in the walkes, be paid next terme.’ In the
-following year a further supply was ordered ‘of more yonge elme trees in
-the places of such as are decayed, and that a new Rayle and quicksett
-hedge bee set uppon the upper walke at the good discretion of Mr. Bacon
-and Mr. Wilbraham, soe that the charges thereof do not exceed the sum of
-seventy pounds.’ And, this limit having apparently been carefully
-observed, in 1600, £60 6s. 8d. was paid to Mr. Bacon ‘for money
-disbursed about the Garnishing of the Walkes.’</p>
-
-<p>There is also record of a Summer-house erected by Bacon ‘upon a small
-mount’ in the Gardens, which bore a Latin inscription to the effect that
-Francis Bacon erected it in memory of Jeremy Bettenham, formerly Rector
-of the Inn, in the year 1609. It was destroyed in the eighteenth
-century.</p>
-
-<p>The rooks which nest in the trees of Gray’s Inn Gardens, and which fare
-sumptuously upon the fragments of food daily offered to them by the
-residents in the Chambers of Gray’s Inn, made their first appearance
-when the elms on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_162" id="page_162"></a>{162}</span> Chesterfield property in May Fair were felled.
-They appear to have driven out a pair of carrion crows which had built
-here time out of mind, and whose ancestors may well have looked down
-upon the author of the ‘Novum Organum,’ as he walked in those quiet
-alleys with his friend, or mused as he rested on the seat which was so
-callously destroyed a century and a half ago.<a name="FNanchor_70_70" id="FNanchor_70_70"></a><a href="#Footnote_70_70" class="fnanchor">[70]</a></p>
-
-<p>The principal entrance to the Gardens was from Fullwood’s Rents, and,
-when coffee-drinking first came into vogue, Coffee-Houses sprang up
-here, and reaped a rich harvest from the crowds who made of Gray’s Inn
-Gardens a fashionable and popular promenade.</p>
-
-<p>For Gray’s Inn Walks became as fashionable a resort in the seventeenth
-century as Merton Gardens at Oxford in the eighteenth, and when Pepys’
-wife was ‘making some clothes,’ he took her here to observe the
-fashions. And Sir Roger de Coverley loved to pace the green terrace of
-Gray’s Inn.</p>
-
-<p>The figure of the great Philosopher overshadows all others at Gray’s
-Inn, but the Society can boast a long line of members distinguished in
-Politics, the Law and Literature. Sir Philip Sidney was a Member of this
-Inn; so were John Hampden<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_163" id="page_163"></a>{163}</span> and John Pym, and Thomas Cromwell became an
-Ancient in 1534.</p>
-
-<p>Sir William Gascoigne, Chief Justice 1400, is claimed by both Gray’s Inn
-and the Middle Temple. The former can at any rate point to Gascoigne’s
-arms in the bay-window of the Hall.</p>
-
-<p>George Gascoigne, the poet, William Camden, and William Dugdale, the
-great and learned antiquaries, were all members of Gray’s Inn. Among the
-poets who resided here are George Chapman, Samuel Butler, John
-Cleveland, Oliver Goldsmith, and Robert Southey, who entered the Inn in
-1797. Cobbett dwelt here for a season, and another ‘Rymer’ in the author
-of the ‘Fœdera.’ Dr. Kenealy, who defended ‘the Claimant,’ was the
-last barrister to have business Chambers here, the tide of legal
-business having flowed down Chancery Lane. Gray’s Inn can boast a Royal
-Bencher in the person of H.R.H. the Duke of Connaught, who, by a
-‘Special Pension’ in 1881, was admitted a Member, called to the Bar, and
-elected a Bencher in one day.</p>
-
-<p>Such, in brief outline, is the history of the Four Inns of Court, in
-which is vested the monopoly of calling to the Bar of England such
-students as have kept terms at the Inn, and have commended<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_164" id="page_164"></a>{164}</span> themselves
-to the approval of the Benchers. Starting as independent voluntary
-associations of students and practisers of the law, either in connection
-with the Court of some great Justiciar, or merely in hostels, where the
-apprentices might find board and lodging during their years of learning,
-they developed into Societies, nobly housed, which controlled their
-students after a collegiate fashion.</p>
-
-<p>Without charters, endowments, or title-deeds, they developed on the
-lines of self-governing Guilds, subject only to a certain ill-defined
-control by the Judges, whilst their property was vested in a
-self-elected Committee of Benchers for the time being. It is under the
-guidance of these Committees that the Inns of Court have gained and
-maintained their position through the centuries, training the successive
-generations of barristers in the high traditions of honour and ability
-characteristic of the English Bar, and imparting to their youthful
-apprentices at the law, through the social system of ‘keeping terms,’
-the unwritten rules of right conduct in the legal profession.</p>
-
-<p>It remains now to glance at the Inns which started level in the race
-with the Inns of Court, but whose history and development have been so
-different.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_165" id="page_165"></a>{165}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_017" id="ill_017"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 356px;">
-<a href="images/ill_018_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_018_sml.jpg" width="356" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">THE GABLED HOUSES OUTSIDE STAPLE INN, HOLBORN</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">They</span> are the sole survivors of Elizabethan domestic architecture to be
-found in the streets of London. The restoration of the frontage was made
-in 1884, under the care of Mr. Alfred Waterhouse.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VIII" id="CHAPTER_VIII"></a>CHAPTER VIII<br /><br />
-<small>INNS OF CHANCERY</small></h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">As</span> is the case with regard to the origin of the Inns of Court, the first
-beginnings of the Inns of Chancery are buried in obscurity, from which
-they can only be retrieved by the discovery of new documents. It seems
-probable, in the absence of definite evidence, that there was at first
-no distinction between Inns of Court and Inns of Chancery, but that, all
-alike, Inns of Court and the ten lesser Inns called Inns of Chancery,
-mentioned by Fortescue, were originally mere Hostels where Students of
-the Law congregated, lived and learned. Then, in course of time, the
-natural laws of differentiation and development came into play, and
-these Inns or Hostels gradually resolved themselves into two classes.
-The four great Inns of Court developed, as we have seen, from small
-associations in small hostels into great and wealthy institutions upon
-lines of aristocratic<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_166" id="page_166"></a>{166}</span> monopoly. The other Inns, taking their names from
-the Clerks of the Chancery who chiefly studied there, passed through
-different stages of development into subjection under the Inns of Court,
-and after a period, during which they partly performed the function of
-preparatory schools for the preliminary training of young students who
-were afterwards admitted as members of the Inns of Court, crystallized
-into close corporations of Solicitors and Attorneys. Then all official
-connection between the two kinds of Inns came to an end.</p>
-
-<p>Thus, whilst the Inns of Court became aristocratic Schools of Law,
-reserved for lawyers of gentle birth, the Inns of Chancery were
-gradually monopolized by Writ clerks, both of the Court of Chancery and
-of the Court of Common Pleas, and by other minor officials. These
-gradually ousted the well-born Apprentices who were training on for the
-Inns of Court. On the one hand Attorneys and Solicitors were excluded
-from the Inns of Court. In 1557, for instance, they were refused
-admission to the Inner Temple, and ordered to repair to their Inns of
-Chancery. In 1574 such as remained were expelled the House. The Middle
-Temple soon followed the example of the Inner.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_167" id="page_167"></a>{167}</span> On the other hand, in
-spite of the remonstrances of the Benchers, the Attorneys, who had
-gained an ascendancy over the Inns of Chancery, set themselves to secure
-a monopoly of them. Without definitely excluding students for the Bar,
-they received them so ungraciously that, for instance, Sir Mathew Hale
-passed straight from Magdalen College, Oxford, to Lincoln’s Inn (1629).
-Indeed, John Selden, the antiquary (1584-1654), seems to have been the
-last of the great lawyers to be trained at these schools for the larger
-Societies. Thus one step in the ladder of education, so much approved by
-Coke and Fortescue, was eliminated. The Inns of Chancery were abandoned
-to the Attorneys.<a name="FNanchor_71_71" id="FNanchor_71_71"></a><a href="#Footnote_71_71" class="fnanchor">[71]</a> They then gradually fell out of fashion and
-deteriorated in discipline as in prestige. By the middle of the
-eighteenth century they had become obsolete. But if they fell early into
-decline, their decadence was long drawn out. The proceedings of the
-Court of Chancery in 1900, in regard to the sale of Clifford’s Inn,
-marked their final disappearance.</p>
-
-<p>Of these ten lesser Inns, mentioned by Fortescue as having, in his day,
-each one hundred students studying the first principles of the Law and
-preparing<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_168" id="page_168"></a>{168}</span> to pass into the four Inns of Court, all have been now
-dissolved, and many of them have been destroyed.</p>
-
-<p>In the days when Clerks of Chancery and Attorneys dwelt in these Inns,
-together with embryo Barristers who were learning the rudiments of their
-legal craft, Stow neatly describes them as Provinces, for they were
-severally subject to one of the Inns of Court. Their relationship is
-obscure. Mr. Inderwick<a name="FNanchor_72_72" id="FNanchor_72_72"></a><a href="#Footnote_72_72" class="fnanchor">[72]</a> compares it to that which the smaller seaport
-towns of the Kent and Sussex coast bore to the more important Cinque
-Ports.</p>
-
-<p>An Inn of Court appointed Readers for its Inns of Chancery, settled the
-precedence of their Principals, admitted their members at a reduced fee,
-and entertained their Ancients at grand feasts and festivals. Each Inn
-of Chancery had its own Hall for meetings, moots, readings, and
-festivity, but none could boast of a Chapel of its own. It was only
-after having studied the necessary exercises at these ‘provincial’ Inns,
-including boltings, moots, and putting of cases, that the young students
-or apprentices were admitted as students at one of the four Inns of
-Court.</p>
-
-<p>Of the Inns of Chancery, Staple Inn and Barnard’s<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_169" id="page_169"></a>{169}</span> Inn were attached to
-Gray’s Inn; Clifford’s Inn, Clement’s Inn, and Lyon’s Inn to the Inner
-Temple; Furnival’s Inn and Thavie’s Inn to Lincoln’s Inn; and to the
-Middle Temple, New Inn and Strand Inn.</p>
-
-<p>Of these by far the most interesting and picturesque at the present time
-is Staple Inn.</p>
-
-<p>It was of this ‘little nook composed of two irregular quadrangles’ that
-Dickens wrote in ‘Edwin Drood’:</p>
-
-<p>‘It is one of those nooks, the turning into which out of the clashing
-street imparts to the relieved pedestrian the sensation of having cotton
-in his ears, and velvet soles on his boots. It is one of those nooks
-where a few smoky sparrows twitter in smoky trees, as though they called
-to one another: “Let us play at country,” and where a few feet of
-garden-mould and a few yards of gravel enable them to do that refreshing
-violence to their tiny understandings.’</p>
-
-<p>Nothing could be more striking or delightful than the block of quaint
-old buildings, with its overhanging stories of timber and rough-cast,
-and its gabled roof. The preservation of this delightful specimen of
-Elizabethan domestic architecture, which stands at Holborn Bars like an
-island of art in an ocean of crude ugliness, we owe to the wisdom<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_170" id="page_170"></a>{170}</span> and
-good taste of the Directors of the Prudential Assurance Company, to whom
-the site now belongs. It is a pleasure to express one’s gratitude to
-them.</p>
-
-<p>Staple Inn Hall, which forms the south side of the first Court within
-the old entrance archway facing Holborn, was built and embellished
-between 1580 and 1592. The frontage dates from about the same time, so
-that Sir George Buck, writing in 1615, could describe it as ‘the fayrest
-Inn of Chancery in this University.’ The Hall is now used for the
-Institute of Actuaries. It retains a delightful little louvre, with a
-bell in a cupola. Mullioned windows and a charming Gothic doorway (1753)
-open, on the far side of the Hall, upon the garden front.</p>
-
-<p>Beyond this old sunk garden, which is bounded by a terrace and iron
-railing, the Patent Office occupies part of what was once the property
-of the Inn. To the west the garden is overshadowed by the flamboyant
-atrocity of a gross Bank building. The houses which form these quiet
-courts were for the most part rebuilt in the eighteenth century. No. 10,
-in the second Court, is that immortalized by Dickens in ‘Edwin Drood’
-(Chapter XI.). It was rebuilt in 1747, and the initials over the doorway
-do <i>not</i> stand for Perhaps John Thomas, or<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_171" id="page_171"></a>{171}</span> Perhaps Joe Tyler, nor for
-any other of the phrases the humourist suggests, but for plain Principal
-John Thomson, who ruled in that year.</p>
-
-<p>Staple, or Stapled Inn, has been so called since the beginning of the
-fourteenth century (1313). The Staple Inn, or House, was the Warehouse
-in which commodities, especially wool, chargeable with export duties,
-might be stored, weighed, and taxed. It was the business of the Company
-of Staplers, established in the reign of Edward III., ‘to see the Custom
-duly paid.’<a name="FNanchor_73_73" id="FNanchor_73_73"></a><a href="#Footnote_73_73" class="fnanchor">[73]</a> The proximity of Portpool Market&mdash;or Ely Fair, as it was
-called, after the Bishops of Ely, whose large property lay on the North
-side of Holborn&mdash;doubtless added much to the importance of this Staple
-Inn.</p>
-
-<p>The site of this Inn may possibly have been included in the Old Temple
-property, which the Templars sold to the Bishopric of Lincoln when they
-moved South (Chapter I.). However that may be, some time in the
-fifteenth century Staple Inn ceased to have any claim to be a
-Customs-house,<a name="FNanchor_74_74" id="FNanchor_74_74"></a><a href="#Footnote_74_74" class="fnanchor">[74]</a> and was given over to the Lawyers. It<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_172" id="page_172"></a>{172}</span> was not a
-surprising change, for the conduct of the King’s wool-trade and the
-settlement of the disputes that must have arisen in connection with the
-clearing of woollen merchandise for export were likely to have made ‘Le
-Stapled Halle’ long ere this a home of clerks and apprentices of the
-Law.<a name="FNanchor_75_75" id="FNanchor_75_75"></a><a href="#Footnote_75_75" class="fnanchor">[75]</a> The steps by which this home of lawyers passed into the control
-of the ‘Grand Company and Fellows’ of Staple Inn, with a Principal and
-Pensioner at their Head, are not known. They must, at least, have been
-taken long before ‘the first Grant of the inheritance thereof to the
-Ancients of Gray’s Inn’ mentioned by Dugdale as being dated in the
-twentieth year of Henry VIII. The transaction referred to would seem to
-have been rather in the nature of the creation of a trust. At any rate,
-Staple Inn became an appendance of Gray’s Inn. But by the end of the
-last century it had long ceased to fulfil the functions either of a
-Customs-house or of an Inn for Law-students.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, in 1884, the Society of Staple sold their property, and the
-Prudential Assurance Company presently acquired it. Under their
-public-spirited and artistic care, Mr. Alfred Waterhouse made a
-practical and scholarly restoration, displacing from<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_173" id="page_173"></a>{173}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_018" id="ill_018"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 348px;">
-<a href="images/ill_019_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_019_sml.jpg" width="348" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">STAPLE INN HALL AND COURTYARD</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">The</span> Hall was built between 1580 and 1592, and has a fine hammer-beam
-roof, and some old stained glass in its windows.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">the frontage the plaster with which the eighteenth century had
-disfigured it.</p>
-
-<p>The most famous occupant of rooms in Staple Inn was Dr. Johnson (1759),
-who came here after he had completed his ‘Dixonary.’ It was here that he
-wrote his little romance of ‘Rasselas,’ in order to pay for his mother’s
-funeral.</p>
-
-<p>The Mackworth coat-of-arms over a modest doorway between 22 and 23
-Holborn used to indicate until recently the entrance to Barnard’s Inn,
-the other Inn attached to Gray’s Inn.</p>
-
-<p>This was the residence of Dr. John Mackworth, who was Dean of Lincoln in
-the reign of Henry VI. When leased by his successor to Lyonel Barnard,
-it took the name which it now bears. The Inn was let to students of Law
-as early as 1454, for in that year Stow records that there was a great
-affray in Fleet Street between ‘men of Court’ and the inhabitants there,
-in the course of which the Queen’s Attorney was slain. As punishment,
-the principal Governors of Clifford’s Inn, Furnival’s Inn, and Barnard’s
-Inn were sent to prison.</p>
-
-<p>Barnard’s Inn was governed by a Principal and twelve Ancients. The study
-of legal forms was insisted on with great strictness. Fines were imposed
-of one halfpenny for every defective word,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_174" id="page_174"></a>{174}</span> one farthing for every
-defective syllable, and one penny for every improper word in writing the
-writs according to the form of the Chancery, in the moots of the
-House.<a name="FNanchor_76_76" id="FNanchor_76_76"></a><a href="#Footnote_76_76" class="fnanchor">[76]</a></p>
-
-<p>A Reader was appointed by Gray’s Inn, and great respect was paid to him.
-The Principal, accompanied by the Ancients and Gentlemen in Commons in
-their gowns, met him at the rails of the House on his coming, and
-conducted him into the Hall.</p>
-
-<p>This is a delightful fifteenth-century building. The original timber and
-rough-cast exterior was cased in red brick in the eighteenth century. It
-has a high-pitched roof and louvre in the centre, and, within, an open
-timber roof, and some heraldic glass in the windows (1500). It stands in
-a small courtyard, beyond which there used to be another Court, wherein
-were the Library and Kitchen, and, beyond, houses grouped about a
-railed-in garden.</p>
-
-<p>Portraits of Lord Chief Justice Holt, the most distinguished Principal,
-and of Lord Burghley, Bacon, Lord Keeper Coventry, and Charles II. once
-hung upon the walls. In 1854 the Society consisted of a Principal, nine
-Ancients, and five Companions. The Companions were chosen by the
-Principal and Ancients. The advantage of<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_175" id="page_175"></a>{175}</span> being a Companion was, in the
-evidence given before the Royal Commission in 1855, stated to be ‘the
-dining’; the advantage of being an Ancient ‘dinners and some little
-fees.’ Barnard’s Inn is now the property of the Mercers’ Company, who
-moved their School hither in 1894. Only the Hall now (1909) remains of
-the old buildings. Even the passage from Holborn has been altered, and
-an imposing block of offices, fronting Holborn, is in course of
-erection, behind which lie the Hall and modern School buildings.</p>
-
-<p>Furnival’s Inn, which Stow says belonged to Sir William Furnival and
-Thomasin, his wife, in the reign of Richard II., lay to the west of the
-Bishop of Ely’s Palace in Holborn. It was brought by the heiress of the
-Furnivals to the Earls of Shrewsbury, from whom it passed to the Society
-of Lincoln’s Inn, and was by them leased to the Principal and Fellows of
-the Inn of Chancery there inhabiting (1548).</p>
-
-<p>Inigo Jones erected a building on this site in 1640, which was
-afterwards demolished. It was rebuilt in 1820, and the site is now
-occupied by part of the new offices of the Prudential Assurance Company.
-Of this Inn Sir Thomas More was Reader for more than three years, and
-here Charles<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_176" id="page_176"></a>{176}</span> Dickens wrote the ‘Pickwick Papers,’ and here he gave John
-Westlock chambers in ‘Martin Chuzzlewit.’ To Charles Dickens’s rooms in
-Furnival’s Inn came an artist seeking employment, who offered two or
-three drawings to illustrate ‘Pickwick,’ which the rising young author
-did not think suitable. This artist was William Makepeace Thackeray. A
-bust of Dickens by Percy Fitzgerald is placed within the entrance of the
-modern pink pile of offices.</p>
-
-<p>Opposite Ely House, and adjoining Crookhorn Alley, stood Thavie’s Inn,
-which is another form, no doubt, of Davy’s Inn. It is spelt so in the
-early records, and the will of John Tavy (1348) mentions his hospice in
-St. Andrew, Holborn (see pp.<a href="#page_005"> 5</a> and <a href="#page_039">39</a>). The spelling ‘Tavy,’ I suppose,
-indicates the Welsh origin of this Mr. Davy. A John Davy occurs as
-holding lands in Holborn fifty years later. This Inn was also closely
-connected with Lincoln’s Inn.</p>
-
-<p>Of the Inns of Chancery which were attached to the Inner Temple, only
-Clifford’s Inn survives, and its days are numbered. Lyon’s Inn, which is
-mentioned as an Inn of Chancery in King Henry V.’s time, lay between Old
-Wych Street and Holywell Street, and disappeared with them<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_177" id="page_177"></a>{177}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_019" id="ill_019"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 379px;">
-<a href="images/ill_020_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_020_sml.jpg" width="379" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">THE GREAT HALL OF THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">Street’s</span> noble Gothic Hall, through which the Judges pass in dignified
-procession at the opening of the Courts after the Long Vacation.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="nind">in the course of the recent Strand improvements. Clement’s Inn took its
-name probably from ‘a fountain called St. Clement’s Well,’ which Stow
-describes (1603) as ‘North from the parish Church of S. Clement’s, and
-neare unto an Inn of Chancerie called Clement’s Inne; [it] is faire
-curbed square with hard stone, kept cleane for common use, and is
-alwayes full.’</p>
-
-<p>The picturesque Queen Anne buildings of the Inn have disappeared, and in
-their place some more pretentious flats and offices have been erected.
-They looked out, until the beginning of 1909, upon a green open space,
-some two acres in extent, bounded by the Law Courts, Carey Street, and
-the Strand. A road runs under the Judges’ Rooms in the Law Courts from
-the Strand to a flight of steps, which lead up to Carey Street beneath
-ornamental arches. This space was intended to be covered by the Law
-Courts, according to the original design. But the estimates were cut
-down, and the block which was meant to cover this space was sacrificed.
-The inconvenience which has resulted for lawyers and litigants ever
-since has been the gain of the less litigious public. For, thanks to the
-generosity of the late Mr. W. H. Smith, the vacant place was laid out as
-a lawn<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_178" id="page_178"></a>{178}</span> and flower-garden, and has long formed a refreshing strip of
-greensward in the heart of this busy centre of London. Two-thirds of it
-have now been sacrificed, for the pressing need of more accommodation is
-at last to be met by the extension of the Law Courts, and the erection
-of four new Courts, which have been begun at the north-west end of this
-plot. The new building, designed to harmonize with Street’s somewhat
-bastard Gothic building, will be connected with it by a bridge of three
-arches spanning the walk between Carey Street and the Strand.</p>
-
-<p>Clifford’s Inn still survives. It can be approached either from Chancery
-Lane, through Serjeants’ Inn, from Fetter Lane, or from Fleet Street.
-Out of the roar and bustle of that busy thoroughfare a passage leads up
-past the porch of St. Dunstan’s Church. On the north side of a tiny
-Court, from which an archway leads into a larger one, stands a tiny
-Hall, with a large clock and windows full of heraldic glass, amongst
-which the chequers of the Cliffords are conspicuous. This Hall in its
-present shape, re-cased and transmogrified, dates from 1797, but a
-fourteenth-century arch at the end of it points to pristine beauty.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_179" id="page_179"></a>{179}</span>A few separate houses are dotted irregularly about on the opposite
-side. But the chief charm of Clifford’s Inn lies in the green grass
-space and shady trees, a garden bounded by railings, and on two sides by
-old brick buildings, with deep cornices and tiled roofs, which forms so
-grateful a view from the interior of the Record Office, or from the
-Court of Serjeants’ Inn.</p>
-
-<p>The Inn is called after Robert de Clifford, whose widow (1344) let the
-messuage to students of the law for £10 per annum. It was acquired by
-the Society at a rental of £4 towards the end of the fifteenth century.
-The Society was composed of the Principal and Rulers, and the Juniors or
-‘Kentish Men.’ It would be of interest, if for no other reason, because
-Coke and Selden once resided here.</p>
-
-<p>It was in Clifford’s Inn that Sir Matthew Hale and the other
-Commissioners sat to deal with the cases which arose after the Great
-Fire of London and the questions of boundaries and rebuilding.</p>
-
-<p>Clifford’s Inn was always reckoned, except by its members, a dependency
-of the Inner Temple. No Inn of Court, at any rate, acquired its lease or
-freehold. Clifford’s Inn paid its own way, had its own customs, its
-great days, and peculiar rules. The most interesting of its old customs
-was a kind<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_180" id="page_180"></a>{180}</span> of grace, which used to be performed after dinner by a
-member of what was mysteriously called the Kentish Mess. The Chairman of
-this Mess, for which a special table was always provided, after bowing
-gravely to the Principal, took from a servitor four small loaves joined
-together in the shape of a cross. These he dashed upon the table before
-him three times, amid profound silence. The bread was then passed down
-to the last man in the Kentish Mess, who carried it from the Hall. A
-number of old women used to wait at the buttery to receive these crumbs
-which had fallen from the rich man’s table. The exact significance of
-the symbolism of this performance is not clear. It is probably the usual
-mixture of Pagan rites and Christian observance. Antiquaries, indeed,
-have suggested that ‘this singular custom typifies offerings to Ceres,
-who first taught mankind the use of laws, and originated those peculiar
-ornaments of civilization, their expounders, the lawyers.’<a name="FNanchor_77_77" id="FNanchor_77_77"></a><a href="#Footnote_77_77" class="fnanchor">[77]</a></p>
-
-<p>Of the Inns attached to the Middle Temple, the Strand, or Chester’s Inn,
-so-called ‘for the nearnesse to the Bishop of Chester’s house’ (Stow),
-stood near the Church of St. Mary le Strand, without Temple Bar. It was
-pulled down by the Protector,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_181" id="page_181"></a>{181}</span> Duke of Somerset, ‘who in place thereof
-raised that large and beautiful house, but yet unfinished, called
-Somerset house.’</p>
-
-<p>Lastly, there was New Inn. In St. George’s Lane, near the Old Bailey,
-was an Inn of Chancery, whence the Society, Stow tells us, moved to ‘a
-common hostelry, called of the sign Our Lady Inne, not far from
-Clement’s Inne, and which they hold by the name of the New Inn, paying
-therefor £6 rent, for more cannot be gotten of them, and much less will
-they be put from it.’ (See <a href="#page_040">40.</a>)</p>
-
-<p>This ‘New Inn,’ which lay west of Clement’s Inn, in Wych Street, has
-also disappeared. Here Sir Thomas More studied prior to his being
-admitted to Lincoln’s Inn.</p>
-
-<p>Next to Serjeants’ Inn in Chancery Lane, and adjoining the garden of
-Clifford’s Inn, stood the House of the Converted Jews, founded by Henry
-III., in place of a Jew’s house forfeited to him (1233).</p>
-
-<p>There were gathered a great number of converted Jews and Infidels, who
-were ‘ordayned and appointed, under an honest rule of life, sufficient
-maintenance,’ and who lived under a learned Christian appointed to
-govern them. As was the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_182" id="page_182"></a>{182}</span> case, however, with the similar House of
-Converts founded by Henry at Oxford, when all Jews were banished from
-the Kingdom in 1290, the number of converts naturally decayed, and the
-House was accordingly annexed by Patent to William Burstall, Clerk,
-Custos Rotulorum, or Keeper of the Rolls of the Chancery, in 1377. ‘This
-first Maister of the Rolles was sworne in Westminster Hall at the Table
-of Marble Stone; since the which time, that house hath beene commonly
-called the Rolles in Chancerie Lane.’ So the invaluable Stow, who adds
-that Jewish converts continued none the less to be relieved there.</p>
-
-<p>Henry III. also built for his Converts ‘a fair Church,’ afterwards ‘used
-and called the Chapel for the custody of Rolls and Records of
-Chancerie.’ The fabric of Rolls Chapel, after being frequently rebuilt,
-had ceased to have any merit. It was demolished when the recent
-additions to the Record Office were made (1895), and when to the vast
-Gothic Tower, designed by Pennethorne, the section facing Chancery Lane
-was added. This building, in spite of its feeble minarets and decadent,
-nondescript ornamentation, often, by virtue of its mass and handsome
-material, looks extremely effective, especially when London sun, shining
-through London mist, dimly<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_183" id="page_183"></a>{183}</span> suffuses its pearly domes with delicate
-pinks and yellows.</p>
-
-<p>Upon the site of Rolls Chapel a Museum of equal size has been built,
-which the present Deputy Keeper of the Records, Sir Henry Maxwell Lyte,
-has made so interesting a feature of our National Archives. In this
-Museum of the Public Record Office, three large monuments, once in the
-Rolls Chapel, have been re-erected, two of them in their former
-positions. They are of great interest and beauty. Chief among them is
-the Tomb of Dr. Young, who was Dean of York and Master of the Rolls
-(died 1516). This beautiful terra-cotta monument is ascribed to
-Torrigiano, who made the splendid tomb in Henry VII.’s Chapel. Here,
-too, are the monuments, in alabaster, of Sir Richard Allington (died
-1561), and of Edward Bruce, Lord Kinlosse, Master of the Rolls, who died
-in 1611.</p>
-
-<p>Amongst other Masters who were buried in Rolls Chapel, Pennant mentions
-Sir John Strange, but without the quibbling line&mdash;</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘Here lies an honest lawyer, that is Strange.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Bishop Butler’s ‘Sermons at the Rolls’ and the fame of Bishop Atterbury
-and Bishop Burnet keep alive the memory of the office of ‘Preacher at
-the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_184" id="page_184"></a>{184}</span> Rolls,’ an office held also by the late Dr. Brewer, whose name is
-famous in the annals of historical research. As to Bishop Burnet, the
-story runs that, in 1684, he preached here upon the text, ‘Save me from
-the lion’s mouth, for Thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns’
-(Ps. xxii. 21), and was promptly dismissed for a sermon supposed to be
-levelled at the Royal Arms.</p>
-
-<p>Seven panels of heraldic glass have been transferred from the old Chapel
-to the new windows of the Museum, and some fragments of a fine chancel
-arch of the thirteenth century, found in the East wall, are there
-preserved. In the Museum a series of Documents of historical interest
-are exhibited, ranging from Domesday Book to the Coronation Roll of
-Queen Victoria. One of the most interesting, perhaps, of the many
-autographs is the suggestive signature of Guy Fawkes before and after he
-had been examined by torture.<a name="FNanchor_78_78" id="FNanchor_78_78"></a><a href="#Footnote_78_78" class="fnanchor">[78]</a></p>
-
-<p>In view of the origin of this House of the Rolls, it is interesting to
-note that Jews began to be admitted to the Bar at the beginning of last
-century. In 1833 Mr. (afterwards Sir) Francis<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_185" id="page_185"></a>{185}</span></p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_020" id="ill_020"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 340px;">
-<a href="images/ill_021_lg.jpg">
-<img src="images/ill_021_sml.jpg" width="340" height="500" alt="[Image unavailable.]" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p class="c">CLIFFORD’S INN</p>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">Showing</span> the gloomy little Hall reconstructed in 1797 (see <a href="#page_178">p. 178</a>), a
-corner of the shady garden, and the fretted lantern of St. Dunstan’s
-Church in Fleet Street.</p></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Goldsmid was ‘called’ at Lincoln’s Inn, and Sir George Jessel in 1847.
-The latter, in 1873, succeeded Lord Romilly as Master of the Rolls, and
-Keeper of those Records which are stored upon the site of the House
-founded for the maintenance of converted Jews and Infidels.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_186" id="page_186"></a>{186}</span></p>
-
-<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IX" id="CHAPTER_IX"></a>CHAPTER IX<br /><br />
-<small>THE SERJEANTS AND SERJEANTS’ INNS</small></h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">Like</span> so much of the history of the Lawyers and their Inns, the origin of
-the Serjeants and the steps by which they obtained a monopoly of
-pleading are buried in obscurity. It is, at any rate, certain that the
-Serjeants-at-Law, or <i>Servientes ad legem</i>, early acquired the exclusive
-right of audience in the Court of Common Pleas, wherein were determined
-all matters between subject and subject, where the King was not a party.</p>
-
-<p>The Serjeants-at-Law had secured a monopoly of pleading; but, as
-business increased in the Courts, they found themselves unable to deal
-with it. In 1292, therefore, they were empowered, by an ordinance of
-Edward I., to select from the students and apprentices of the Common Law
-some of those best qualified to transact affairs in the King’s Courts
-(<i>cf.</i> p. 6). It is not clear who these students and apprentices were,
-but they were destined in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_187" id="page_187"></a>{187}</span> course of time to supersede the body of
-Counsel whom they were called in to aid.</p>
-
-<p>‘Apprentice’ is a term that smacks of the Guild, and though in the
-fifteenth century it came to be applied to the Serjeants themselves, it
-must originally have denoted the students who sat at the feet of some
-recognized teacher of the Law. But, in truth, we have not enough
-evidence to enable us to trace the developments of the relationship
-between the Serjeants, the Students, and the Inns. The fact that the
-Serjeants, or Doctors of Law, upon attaining that degree, entirely
-severed their connection with their Inns, and that it was the Masters,
-and not they, who formed the governing bodies of the Inns, may be
-significant of some early difference or antagonism between the original
-Serjeants-and Apprentices-at-Law.</p>
-
-<p>The custom of tolling a newly-elected Serjeant out of Lincoln’s Inn by
-ringing the chapel bell&mdash;‘a half-humorous, half-serious reminder that
-hence-forward he was dead to the Society’&mdash;may be considered to support
-this view.<a name="FNanchor_79_79" id="FNanchor_79_79"></a><a href="#Footnote_79_79" class="fnanchor">[79]</a></p>
-
-<p>The obscurity of this question is enhanced, not only by the lack of
-documentary evidence, but also by the fact that the technical terms of
-the profession<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_188" id="page_188"></a>{188}</span> had no stationary significance. <i>Apprenticii ad legem</i>
-was a fluid phrase; it came to be applied to the genuine junior
-apprentices of the law in the Inns of Chancery, to the senior students
-who instructed them, as well as to those who had completed the eight
-years’ curriculum of the University, and, having passed their
-examinations, were admitted to practise as advocates in Court, to the
-very Serjeants and Judges themselves.</p>
-
-<p>We have seen how the topography of the Inns of Court&mdash;and of London
-itself&mdash;is bound up with the history of the Crusades and the Order of
-Templars who sprang from them. It is supposed that the Order of
-Serjeants, these Professors of the Common Law, who acquired the
-exclusive privilege of practising in the Court of Common Pleas, imitated
-the second degree of the Old Templars, and derived their name from the
-‘free serving brethren’ of the Order of the Temple. The word Serjeant is
-said to translate the Latin <i>Servientes</i>, and the King’s
-Servants-at-Law, <i>Servientes domini Regis ad legem</i>, were, it is
-suggested, the lineal descendants of the <i>fratres servientes</i>, the
-servant brethren, of the Knights Templars. The peculiar dress of the
-‘Order of the Coif’ is advanced as an argument in support of this
-fascinating pedigree. The Serjeants-at-Law marked<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_189" id="page_189"></a>{189}</span> their rank, it is
-suggested, by wearing red caps, under which, as in the East, a linen
-cap, or coif, was worn. Did the Templars bring this habit from the East,
-and were their first ‘servants’ Mohammedan prisoners? At any rate, the
-coif proper was a kind of white hood made of lawn (later of silk), which
-completely covered the head like a wig, and whilst the later black patch
-represented the cornered cap worn over it, the true vestigial
-representative of the coif is to be found in the white border of the
-lawyer’s wig.<a name="FNanchor_80_80" id="FNanchor_80_80"></a><a href="#Footnote_80_80" class="fnanchor">[80]</a> A connection may be traced between the white linen
-thrown over the head of a Serjeant on his creation and the white mantle
-in which the novice was clothed when, in the Chapel of St. Anne, he was
-initiated into the Order of the Knights Templars, and declared a free,
-equal, elected and admitted brother.</p>
-
-<p>In this connection it is at least noteworthy that the Serjeants had a
-cult for St. Thomas of Acre (Thomas à Becket), and that in the Chapel of
-their patron Saint, adjoining the Old Hall of the Temple, they used to
-pray before going to St. Paul’s to select their pillars. The Knights of
-St. Thomas in Palestine were placed at Acre under the Templars in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_190" id="page_190"></a>{190}</span>
-Holy Land, and a Chapel dedicated to St. Thomas of Acre was built for
-them. Can it be that the Serjeants trace from the subservient Order of
-the Knights of St. Thomas?</p>
-
-<p>There is some trace of an ecclesiastical origin, not only in their
-‘long, priest-like robes,’ which Fortescue describes, ‘with a cape,
-furred with white lamb about their shoulders, and thereupon a hood with
-two labels,’ but also in their performance of a rite, which none but
-priests might offer, in a solemn ceremony that lasted down to the
-Reformation. When feasts were held in the Temple Hall, the Serjeants, in
-the middle of the feast, went to the Chapel of St. Thomas of Acre in
-Cheapside, built by Thomas à Becket’s sister after his canonization, and
-there offered; and then to St. Paul’s, where they offered at St.
-Erkenwald’s shrine; then into the body of the Church. Here they were
-appointed to their pillars by the Steward of the feast, to which they
-then returned.</p>
-
-<p>The theory has, indeed, been advanced that the coif was a device for
-covering the tonsure of ecclesiastical pleaders after clerics had been
-forbidden to practise in the secular Courts. But this explanation seems
-too ingenious.</p>
-
-<p>The ceremony of choosing a pillar at St. Paul’s,<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_191" id="page_191"></a>{191}</span> referred to above,
-points to the ancient practice of the Lawyers taking each his station at
-one of the pillars in the Cathedral, and there waiting for clients. ‘The
-legal sage stood, it is said, with pen in hand, and dexterously noted
-down the particulars of every man’s case on his knee.’<a name="FNanchor_81_81" id="FNanchor_81_81"></a><a href="#Footnote_81_81" class="fnanchor">[81]</a></p>
-
-<p>It long remained the custom of the Law-Courts to adjourn at noon. Then
-the Serjeants would repair to the ‘Parvis,’ or porch, of St. Paul’s to
-meet their clients in consultation. And this practice is alluded to by
-Chaucer:</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘A serjeant of the law ware and wise,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">That often had y been at the “Parvise,”<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">There was also, full rich of excellence.<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Discreet he was, and of great reverence;<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">He seemed such, his words were so wise.<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Justice he was full often in assize,<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">By patent and by pleine commissioun.’<br /></span>
-<span class="i7"><i>‘Prologue,’ Canterbury Tales.</i><br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Whatever the exact history of their lineage, the trained lawyers who
-were summoned to attend and advise the King in Council did, undoubtedly,
-become a recognized Order, styled <i>Servientes Regis ad Legem</i>&mdash;King’s
-Serjeants-at-Law. From their ranks the Judges were always supposed to be
-chosen. The old formula at Westminster, when<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_192" id="page_192"></a>{192}</span> a new Serjeant approached
-the Judges, was, ‘I think I see a brother.’ Down to the time of the
-abolition of the Order, a lawyer, when nominated a Judge, first had to
-get himself admitted a Serjeant, and to enter the Order of the Coif.
-This was always an expensive step.</p>
-
-<p>Fortescue enlarges upon the cost which attended the ceremonies, when one
-of the persons ‘pitched upon by the Lord Chief Justice with the advice
-and consent of all the Judges’ was summoned in virtue of the King’s Writ
-to take upon him the state and degree of a Serjeant-at-Law.</p>
-
-<p>His own bill for the gold rings he was obliged to present&mdash;<i>fidei
-symbolo</i>&mdash;on such an occasion to the Princes, Dukes, Archbishops and
-Judges who were present at the ‘sumptuous feast, like that at a
-Coronation, lasting seven days, which the new-created Serjeants were
-called upon to give,’ amounted to £50. There is record of a Serjeants’
-Feast held in the Inner Temple, 1555, which cost over £660. These feasts
-were held at first at Ely Place, Lambeth Palace, or St. John’s Priory at
-Clerkenwell. Afterwards they took place in the Hall of the Inn of which
-the new Serjeant had been a Student. The whole House contributed to the
-expense of this degree. The elaborate ceremonies<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_193" id="page_193"></a>{193}</span> which attended the
-creation of a new Serjeant-at-Law are given at length by Dugdale
-(chapter xli. <i>et seq.</i>). It would be out of place to recount them here.</p>
-
-<p>It has been humorously, though not quite accurately, observed that the
-Bar ‘went into mourning for Queen Anne, and has remained in mourning
-ever since.’ The sombre robes now worn by the English Bar may well be
-thought to symbolize the dignity of the law and the gravity of the
-profession, as the ‘spotless ermine’ typifies the integrity and
-independence of the Judges. But, as was the case with the hoods and
-gowns of other degrees in other Universities, or the black <i>felze</i> of a
-gondola at Venice, brilliancy and splendour of colour was the original
-note, and dulness was the result of restriction. The robes which the
-Serjeants wore varied from time to time, and with different occasions.</p>
-
-<p>In the seventeenth century Dugdale observes that their robes still in
-some degree resembled ‘those of the Justices of either Bench, and were
-of murrey, black furred with white, and scarlet. But the robe which they
-usually wear at their Creation only is of murrey and mouse-colour,’ with
-a suitable hood and the coif.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_194" id="page_194"></a>{194}</span></p>
-
-<p>Arrangements were made about 1635 between the Judges and Serjeants, in
-accordance with which gowns of black cloth were to be worn for
-term-time; violet cloth for Court or holidays; scarlet in procession to
-St. Paul’s, or when dining in state at the Guildhall or attending the
-Sovereign’s presence at the House of Lords, and black silk for trials at
-<i>Nisi Prius</i>. But the fashions and colours were always changing. The
-violet gown, which superseded the mustard and murrey worn in Court
-during term-time, gave occasion for Jekyll’s witty rhyme, when a dull
-Serjeant was wearying the Court with a prosy argument:</p>
-
-<div class="poetry">
-<div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
-<span class="i0">‘The Serjeants are a grateful race;<br /></span>
-<span class="i2">Their dress and language show it;<br /></span>
-<span class="i1">Their purple robes from Tyre we trace;<br /></span>
-<span class="i2">Their arguments go to it.’<br /></span>
-</div></div>
-</div>
-
-<p>It was the militant Chief Justice Willes who, ten years after the ’45,
-first endeavoured to secure the abolition of the exclusive right of the
-Serjeants to practise in the Court of Common Pleas. But their hour had
-not yet come. In 1834 a mandate was obtained from William IV. abolishing
-the privilege of the Serjeants, but this was set aside by the Privy
-Council as being defective in form. At length doom fell upon the old
-Order of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_195" id="page_195"></a>{195}</span> Coif, in the shape of an Act of Parliament, 1846, which
-threw open the Common Pleas to all counsel indiscriminately. The last
-Queen’s Serjeants to be appointed were Serjeants Byles, Channel, Shee,
-and Wrangham, in 1857. By the Judicature Act of 1873, which consolidated
-the three Courts of Law at Westminster (<i>See</i> Chapter I.) into the High
-Court of Justice, the Judges were no longer required to receive the coif
-on their nomination to the bench. The knell of the Serjeants’ doom had
-now rung. Five years later their Inn in Chancery Lane and the
-Brotherhood were dissolved.</p>
-
-<p>When the mere pillars of St. Paul’s had ceased to be regarded as
-satisfactory ‘chambers,’ the Serjeants, like the law-apprentices, took
-possession of Inns for the purposes of practice and residence. These
-Inns remained independent bodies, and never became, like the Inns of
-Chancery, subject to the Inns of Court.</p>
-
-<p>Scrope’s Inn, adjoining the Palace of the Bishops of Ely, and opposite
-the Church of St. Andrew in Holborn, was the first abode of the
-Serjeants. Its site was long marked by Scrope’s Court in Holborn. It
-took its name from the Le Scropes, who rose to eminence under Edward I.
-Two brothers, Sir Henry and Sir Geoffrey, both became Chief Justice<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_196" id="page_196"></a>{196}</span> of
-King’s Bench, in 1317 and 1324 respectively. Richard Le Scrope, son of
-the former, was created Baron Scrope of Bolton, and was twice Chancellor
-of England. He died in 1403, whilst in residence at his Inn. Scrope’s
-Inn would thus naturally be a centre round which the trained professors
-of the law would congregate, as round Lincoln’s Inn and Grey’s Inn, to
-help in the transaction of the business of the Justice of King’s Bench.
-It then became an Inn for Judges and Serjeants-at-Law, and so continued
-until, in 1498, it was abandoned. For the lawyers were concentrating
-upon the southern end of Chancellor’s Lane and Fleet Street. The
-Serjeants took up their residence in Serjeants’ Inn (Fleet Street) at
-least as early as the reign of Henry VI., and probably much earlier
-(Dugdale). This Inn is connected with the Inner Temple by a passage past
-the little garden once in the possession of Sir Edward Coke, and
-afterwards known as the ‘Benchers’ Garden.’ But the principal entrance
-is from Fleet Street, through a pair of handsome iron gates, in which
-are wrought the arms of the Inn, a dove and a serpent.</p>
-
-<p>The Gate House forms the offices of the Norwich Union Fire and Life
-Assurance Society. The whole Inn was burnt down in the Great Fire, and
-was<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_197" id="page_197"></a>{197}</span> afterwards rebuilt (1670) by means of voluntary subscriptions on
-the part of the Serjeants. But upon the expiration of the lease then
-granted to them, the Serjeants abandoned their Inn, with its fine
-chapel, hall, and houses that surrounded the Court, and united with
-their brethren in Chancery Lane. The Inn was afterwards pulled down and
-rebuilt from the designs of Adam, the architect of the Adelphi, for
-private houses and Assurance offices. The ‘elegant building,’ as Herbert
-calls it, in the classical style, which was erected on the site of the
-old Hall, formed at first the offices of the Amicable Assurance Company,
-and is now occupied by the Church of England Sunday School Institute.
-The quiet quadrangle is surrounded by pleasing eighteenth-century
-houses, with decorated porches and fine iron-work. Some of them have
-extinguishers for the links in front of their porches. Loftie noted the
-initials “S. I.” and the date 1669 upon one survivor of the Serjeants’
-rebuilding.</p>
-
-<p>The Inn, which the Serjeants joined when they left Fleet Street, had
-been occupied by their brethren since the end of the fourteenth century.
-But, though leased to their representatives by the Bishops of Ely, who
-held the freehold, or their lessees, it was not called Serjeants’ Inn
-until 1484.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_198" id="page_198"></a>{198}</span> Prior to that date it was known as Faryngdon’s Inn in
-Chancellor’s Lane. Here all the Judges, as having been Serjeants-at-Law
-before their elevation to the Bench, had chambers assigned to them.</p>
-
-<p>A plain, unpleasing, stuccoed, Early Victorian building now faces
-Chancery Lane, and drops as a screen of ugliness across the old brick
-buildings within. This we owe to Sir Robert Smirke, who rebuilt the Inn
-(1837-1838), with the exception of the old Hall, which was ‘approached
-by a handsome flight of stone steps and balustrade.’ So Herbert, who
-says that in his day (1804) all the buildings were modern. He describes
-the Inn as then consisting of two small Courts, the principal entrance
-from Chancery Lane fronting the Hall, and the second Court communicating
-with Clifford’s Inn by a small passage. As there is an exit from
-Clifford’s Inn to Fetter Lane, it is thus possible to pass from Chancery
-Lane to Fetter<a name="FNanchor_82_82" id="FNanchor_82_82"></a><a href="#Footnote_82_82" class="fnanchor">[82]</a> Lane without going into Fleet Street. When, in 1877,
-the Brotherhood of Serjeants dissolved, they sold the Inn for some
-£60,000 to Serjeant Cox, and divided the proceeds, but gave the
-twenty-six valuable<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_199" id="page_199"></a>{199}</span> portraits of their predecessors, that had adorned
-the walls of the Hall, to the National Portrait Gallery. The tiny Hall,
-the single, narrow Court of plain stuccoed houses, and some trees and
-turf behind some railings, remain to remind us of the Serjeants’ Inn and
-the Serjeants’ Garden, where Lord Keeper Guildford would take his ease,
-and where the great roll of English Judges have had chambers. But the
-beautiful old stained glass windows of the Hall and Chapel, which bore
-the arms of the various members, together with the heraldic device of
-the Order&mdash;an ibis <i>proper</i> on a shield <i>or</i>&mdash;were removed by the
-purchaser to his residence of Millhill, where he built a chamber, the
-facsimile of the Hall, for their reception.</p>
-
-<p>Such is the story of the Inns of Court, which have gone on from strength
-to strength, and of the Inns of Chancery and the Serjeants’ Inns, which
-have almost vanished, together with the Societies which made them
-famous, from off the changing face of London. It is a story which,
-though briefly told, and told by a layman who makes no claim to
-originality of material, can hardly fail to be of interest to those who
-are alive to the charm of the old things of the Capital.</p>
-
-<p>It brings before us, not only the vision of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_200" id="page_200"></a>{200}</span> great Justiciars who
-transacted the business of the King’s Courts, of the great Lawyers who
-built up the mighty fabric of English Law, and the great Judges who
-defended the rights and liberties and progress of the people, but also
-many of the greatest names in literature and architecture. The precincts
-of the Temple remind us of the Order of the Red-Cross Knights, and near
-at hand are the vacated Inns of that other Order which has been likewise
-dissolved. For we see no more, save in the light of imagination, either
-the mail-clad figures of the Templars in their white cloaks stamped with
-the red cross, or the Serjeants in their white lawn coifs and
-parti-coloured gowns, wending their way from the Temple Hall to the
-shrine of St. Thomas.</p>
-
-<p>The silver tongue of Harcourt is mute as the impassioned eloquence of
-Burke and Sheridan, yet these buildings seem to echo with their voices,
-with the sonorous declamation of Dr. Johnson, or the witty stammer of
-Charles Lamb. There, in Gray’s Inn, we still seem to see the figure of
-Francis Bacon, pacing the walks with Raleigh, talking of trees and
-politics and high adventure; from the Gateway of Lincoln’s Inn, and past
-the red bricks laid by Ben Jonson, when Wolsey was<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_201" id="page_201"></a>{201}</span> Cardinal, the form
-of Sir Thomas More emerges; and across the way the thin, alert figure of
-Sir Edward Coke steps briskly from his tiny garden into Old Serjeants’
-Inn.</p>
-
-<p>Here Dickens talks with Thackeray, and Blackstone scowls at Goldsmith;
-there, in the Middle Temple Hall, Queen Elizabeth leads the dance with
-Sir Christopher Hatton, and the rafters ring with the music of
-Shakespeare’s voice and Shakespeare’s poetry. And the buildings
-themselves are the works of a noble army of English Architects,
-admirable creations and memorials of the genius of Sir Christopher Wren,
-Inigo Jones, Adam, Hardwick, Street, and of the unknown builders of
-Norman, Gothic, and Elizabethan things. These facts once known, not all
-the dirt and fog of London air, not all the noise and distraction of
-City business and legal affairs, can ever again wholly obscure the
-charm, the romance, the historical and literary associations, which
-haunt these homes of so many great English Lawyers, Writers, and
-Administrators.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_202" id="page_202"></a>{202}</span></p>
-
-<h2><a name="APPENDIX" id="APPENDIX"></a>APPENDIX</h2>
-
-<p class="nind"><span class="smcap">The</span> following is a list of the chief authorities referred to in the
-foregoing pages:</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li><span class="smcap">Addison, C. G.</span>: The Knights Templars.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Bayliss, T.</span>: The Temple Church.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Bedwell, C. E. A.</span>: Quarterly Review, 1908.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Bellot, H.</span>: The Inner and Middle Temple.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Douthwaite</span>: Gray’s Inn, 1886.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Dugdale, William</span>: Origines Juridicales, 1671.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Fletcher, J.</span>: The Pension Book of Gray’s Inn, 1901.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Fortescue, Sir John</span>: De Laudibus Legum.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Gough</span>: Sepulchral Monuments.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Herbert, William</span>: Antiquities of the Inns of Court and Chancery, 1804.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Inderwick, F. C., K.C.</span>: Calendar of the Inner Temple Records.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Kelly, J.</span>: Short History of the English Bar.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Leigh, Gerard</span>: Accedence of Armorie, 1653.</li>
-<li>Lincoln’s Inn, The Black Books of, 1897.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Loftie, W. J.</span>: Inns of Court and Chancery, 1895.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Manningham, John</span>, Diary of, 1868.</li>
-<li>Minutes of Parliament of the Middle Temple.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Pitt-Lewis, G.</span>: History of the Temple, 1898.<span class="pagenum"><a name="page_203" id="page_203"></a>{203}</span></li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Pollock</span> and <span class="smcap">Maitland</span>: History of English Law.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Pulling, Alexander</span>: The Order of the Coif, 1884.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Spedding, James</span>: Life and Letters of Francis Bacon.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Spilsbury, W. H.</span>: Lincoln’s Inn, 1850.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Stow, John</span>: Survey of London, Ed. Kingsford, 1908.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Wheatley, H. B.</span>: Literary Landmarks of London.</li>
-<li><span class="smcap">Williams, E.</span>: Staple Inn.</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_204" id="page_204"></a>{204}</span></p>
-
-<h2><a name="INDEX" id="INDEX"></a>INDEX</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><a href="#A">A</a>,
-<a href="#B">B</a>,
-<a href="#C">C</a>,
-<a href="#D">D</a>,
-<a href="#E">E</a>,
-<a href="#F">F</a>,
-<a href="#G">G</a>,
-<a href="#H">H</a>,
-<a href="#I-i">I</a>,
-<a href="#J">J</a>,
-<a href="#K">K</a>,
-<a href="#L">L</a>,
-<a href="#M">M</a>,
-<a href="#N">N</a>,
-<a href="#O">O</a>,
-<a href="#P">P</a>,
-<a href="#Q">Q</a>,
-<a href="#R">R</a>,
-<a href="#S">S</a>,
-<a href="#T">T</a>,
-<a href="#V-i">V</a>,
-<a href="#W">W</a>,
-<a href="#Y">Y</a>.</p>
-
-<p class="nind">
-<a name="A" id="A"></a>Abinger, Lord, <a href="#page_103">103</a><br />
-
-Abram, Messrs., shop, <a href="#page_067">67</a><br />
-
-Adam, architect, <a href="#page_197">197</a>, <a href="#page_201">201</a><br />
-
-Addison, Joseph, <a href="#page_062">62</a>, <a href="#page_066">66</a><br />
-
-Ainger, Canon, <a href="#page_059">59</a><br />
-
-Albert, Prince, <a href="#page_120">120</a><br />
-
-Alderson, Edward Hall, <a href="#page_094">94</a><br />
-
-Allington, Sir Richard, <a href="#page_183">183</a><br />
-
-Ancients. See Benchers<br />
-
-Anson, Sir William, <a href="#page_072">72</a><br />
-
-Apprentices at the Law, <a href="#page_005">5</a>, <a href="#page_006">6</a>, <a href="#page_009">9</a>, <a href="#page_012">12</a>, 1<a href="#page_007">7</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_036">36</a>, <a href="#page_038">38</a>, <a href="#page_039">39</a>, <a href="#page_166">166</a>, <a href="#page_186">186-188</a><br />
-
-Ashburton, Lord, <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-
-Ashmole, Elias, <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-
-Asquith, Right Hon. H. H., <a href="#page_093">93</a><br />
-
-Atterbury, Bishop, <a href="#page_183">183</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="B" id="B"></a>Bacon, <a href="#page_136">136</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Sir Francis, <a href="#page_089">89</a>, <a href="#page_144">144-146</a>, <a href="#page_148">148-152</a>, <a href="#page_155">155-162</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Sir Nicholas, <a href="#page_146">146</a>, <a href="#page_153">153</a>, <a href="#page_156">156</a></span><br />
-
-Barebone, Dr., <a href="#page_143">143</a><br />
-
-Barnard’s Inn, <a href="#page_102">102</a>, <a href="#page_173">173-175</a><br />
-
-Barristers, Inner, <a href="#page_011">11</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Outer, or Utter, <a href="#page_011">11</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Roll, <a href="#page_080">80</a></span><br />
-
-Bathurst, Lord, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Beaumont, Francis, <a href="#page_089">89</a>, <a href="#page_152">152</a><br />
-
-Benchers, <a href="#page_011">11</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_061">61</a>, <a href="#page_095">95</a>, <a href="#page_100">100</a>, <a href="#page_153">153</a><br />
-
-Bernasconi, <a href="#page_117">117</a><br />
-
-Bettenham, Jeremy, <a href="#page_161">161</a><br />
-
-Blackfriars, <a href="#page_108">108</a>, <a href="#page_109">109</a><br />
-
-Blackstone, Sir W., <a href="#page_070">70</a>, <a href="#page_165">165</a><br />
-
-Boswell, James, <a href="#page_087">87-89</a><br />
-
-Bolting, <a href="#page_059">59</a><br />
-
-Bowen, Lord, <a href="#page_072">72</a><br />
-
-Brewer, Dr., <a href="#page_184">184</a><br />
-
-Brougham, Lord, <a href="#page_117">117</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Burghley, Lord, <a href="#page_142">142</a><br />
-
-Burke, Edmund, <a href="#page_045">45</a>, <a href="#page_069">69</a><br />
-
-Burleigh, Lord, <a href="#page_149">149</a><br />
-
-Burnet, Bishop, <a href="#page_183">183</a>, <a href="#page_184">184</a><br />
-
-Butler, Bishop, <a href="#page_183">183</a><br />
-
-Butler, Samuel, <a href="#page_057">57</a>, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-Byllyng, Sir W., <a href="#page_139">139</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="C" id="C"></a>Camden, William, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-Campbell, Lord, <a href="#page_081">81</a>, <a href="#page_093">93</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Thomas, <a href="#page_126">126</a></span><br />
-
-Canning, George, <a href="#page_093">93</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Carew, Sir Randolph, <a href="#page_098">98</a><br />
-
-Carey Street, <a href="#page_177">177</a>, <a href="#page_178">178</a><br />
-
-Chancery Lane (= Chancellor’s Lane = New Street), <a href="#page_001">1</a>, <a href="#page_008">8</a>, <a href="#page_106">106</a>, <a href="#page_107">107</a>, <a href="#page_122">122</a>, <a href="#page_128">128</a>, <a href="#page_196">196-199</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Old Temple in, <a href="#page_029">29</a></span><br />
-
-Chapman, George, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-Chaucer, Geoffrey, <a href="#page_037">37</a>, <a href="#page_064">64</a>, <a href="#page_104">104</a>, <a href="#page_105">105</a>, <a href="#page_191">191</a><br />
-
-Chelmsford, Lord, <a href="#page_103">103</a><br />
-
-Cheshire Cheese, the, <a href="#page_069">69</a><br />
-
-Chester Inn, <a href="#page_180">180</a><br />
-
-Chichester, Bishop of, <a href="#page_106">106</a>, <a href="#page_107">107</a><br />
-
-Child’s Bank, <a href="#page_066">66</a><br />
-
-Churches, Round, <a href="#page_028">28</a>, <a href="#page_029">29</a>, <a href="#page_047">47</a><br />
-
-Cibber, Colley, <a href="#page_103">103</a><br />
-
-City, the, boundaries of, <a href="#page_006">6</a>, <a href="#page_007">7</a><br />
-
-Clarendon, Lord Chancellor, <a href="#page_080">80</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_205" id="page_205"></a>{205}</span><br />
-
-Clement’s Inn, <a href="#page_095">95</a>, <a href="#page_177">177</a><br />
-
-Clergy excluded from the Courts, <a href="#page_004">4</a>, <a href="#page_008">8</a><br />
-
-Cleveland, John, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-Clifford’s Inn, <a href="#page_005">5</a>, <a href="#page_167">167</a>, <a href="#page_176">176</a>, <a href="#page_178">178-180</a>, <a href="#page_198">198</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Kentish Mess, <a href="#page_180">180</a></span><br />
-
-Cobbett, William, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-Cockburn, Sir Alexander, <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-
-Coif, the, <a href="#page_192">192</a>, <a href="#page_195">195</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Order of the, <a href="#page_188">188</a>, <a href="#page_189">189</a></span><br />
-
-Coke, Sir Edward, <a href="#page_087">87</a>, <a href="#page_092">92</a>, <a href="#page_098">98</a>, <a href="#page_179">179</a>, <a href="#page_196">196</a>, <a href="#page_201">201</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Lord, <a href="#page_146">146</a></span><br />
-
-Coleridge, Lord, <a href="#page_072">72</a><br />
-
-Colman, George, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Colonies, the, and the Inns of Court, <a href="#page_078">78-80</a><br />
-
-‘Comedy of Errors,’ the, <a href="#page_150">150</a><br />
-
-Coney Garth, <a href="#page_107">107</a>, <a href="#page_111">111</a><br />
-
-Congreve, William, <a href="#page_080">80</a><br />
-
-Connaught, H.R.H. the Duke of, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-Converts, House of the, <a href="#page_181">181</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Courts, the Civil, <a href="#page_003">3</a>, <a href="#page_004">4</a><br />
-
-Coverley, Sir Roger de, <a href="#page_162">162</a><br />
-
-Cowper, Lord Chancellor, <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">William, <a href="#page_073">73</a>, <a href="#page_104">104</a></span><br />
-
-Cox, Serjeant, <a href="#page_199">199</a><br />
-
-Cromwell, Oliver, <a href="#page_113">113</a>, <a href="#page_114">114</a>, <a href="#page_130">130</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Thomas, <a href="#page_163">163</a></span><br />
-
-Crusades, <a href="#page_188">188</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">influence of, <a href="#page_002">2</a></span><br />
-
-Cursitor Street, <a href="#page_156">156</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="D" id="D"></a>Davey, Lord, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Day, Thomas, <a href="#page_060">60</a><br />
-
-Denys, Hugh, <a href="#page_140">140</a><br />
-
-Despencer, Hugh le, <a href="#page_036">36</a><br />
-
-Devereux Court, <a href="#page_035">35</a>, <a href="#page_082">82</a><br />
-
-Devil Tavern, the, <a href="#page_066">66</a><br />
-
-Devil’s Own, the, <a href="#page_129">129</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Dickens, Charles, <a href="#page_126">126-128</a>, <a href="#page_169">169-171</a>, <a href="#page_176">176</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">quoted, <a href="#page_046">46</a>, <a href="#page_082">82</a>, <a href="#page_083">83</a></span><br />
-
-Disraeli, Benjamin, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Donne, Dr., <a href="#page_114">114</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Drake, Sir Francis, <a href="#page_078">78</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="E" id="E"></a>Eldon, Lord Chancellor, <a href="#page_081">81</a>, <a href="#page_131">131</a>, <a href="#page_134">134</a><br />
-
-Ellenborough, Lord, <a href="#page_093">93</a>, <a href="#page_094">94</a>, <a href="#page_134">134</a><br />
-
-Ellesmere, Earl of, <a href="#page_129">129</a><br />
-
-Ely, Bishops of, <a href="#page_197">197</a><br />
-
-Ely Place, <a href="#page_171">171</a><br />
-
-Embankment, the, <a href="#page_067">67</a>, <a href="#page_074">74</a>, <a href="#page_094">94</a><br />
-
-Erskine, Lord, <a href="#page_121">121</a>, <a href="#page_133">133</a><br />
-
-Essex House, <a href="#page_035">35</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Water Gate, <a href="#page_084">84</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Inn, <a href="#page_035">35</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Street, <a href="#page_029">29</a>, <a href="#page_035">35</a></span><br />
-
-Evelyn, John, <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-
-Eyre, Sir James, <a href="#page_146">146</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="F" id="F"></a>Faryngdon’s Inn, <a href="#page_198">198</a><br />
-
-Feasts and Bevels. See Inns of Court<br />
-
-Fetter Lane, <a href="#page_178">178</a>, <a href="#page_198">198</a><br />
-
-Fielding, Henry, <a href="#page_062">62</a>, <a href="#page_073">73</a><br />
-
-Finch, Sir Heneage, <a href="#page_099">99</a>, <a href="#page_100">100</a><br />
-
-Fire of London, the, <a href="#page_045">45</a>, <a href="#page_047">47</a>, <a href="#page_057">57</a>, <a href="#page_074">74</a>, <a href="#page_096">96</a>, <a href="#page_103">103</a>, <a href="#page_179">179</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">of 1678, <a href="#page_059">59</a>, <a href="#page_073">73</a>, <a href="#page_081">81</a>, <a href="#page_096">96</a></span><br />
-
-Fitchett’s Field, <a href="#page_030">30</a><br />
-
-Fitzgerald, Edward, quoted, <a href="#page_096">96</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Percy, <a href="#page_176">176</a></span><br />
-
-Fleet Street, <a href="#page_001">1</a>, <a href="#page_002">2</a>, <a href="#page_005">5</a>, <a href="#page_009">9</a>, <a href="#page_029">29-31</a>, <a href="#page_044">44</a>, <a href="#page_065">65</a>, <a href="#page_102">102</a>, <a href="#page_178">178</a>, <a href="#page_196">196</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">No. <a href="#page_016">16</a>, <a href="#page_045">45</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">No. <a href="#page_017">17</a>, <a href="#page_045">45</a></span><br />
-
-Ford, John, <a href="#page_080">80</a><br />
-
-Fresco by Watts, <a href="#page_120">120</a><br />
-
-Furnival’s Inn, <a href="#page_122">122</a>, <a href="#page_175">175</a>, <a href="#page_176">176</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="G" id="G"></a>Gainsborough, <a href="#page_113">113</a><br />
-
-Gardiner, Bishop, <a href="#page_146">146</a><br />
-
-Gascoigne, George, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Sir William, <a href="#page_163">163</a></span><br />
-
-Gauden, Dr. John, <a href="#page_058">58</a><br />
-
-Gibbons, Grinling, <a href="#page_102">102</a><br />
-
-Gifford, Robert, M.R., <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-
-Gladstone, W. E., <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Goldsmith, Oliver, <a href="#page_062">62</a>, <a href="#page_065">65</a>, <a href="#page_069">69-72</a>, <a href="#page_104">104</a>, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-Goldsmith’s grave, <a href="#page_071">71</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_206" id="page_206"></a>{206}</span><br />
-
-Goldsmith, Sir Francis, <a href="#page_185">185</a><br />
-
-‘<i>Gorboduc</i>,’ <a href="#page_099">99</a><br />
-
-Gordon Riots, <a href="#page_131">131</a>, <a href="#page_132">132</a><br />
-
-Grant, Sir William, <a href="#page_133">133</a><br />
-
-Gray, Earl de, <a href="#page_108">108</a><br />
-
-Gray’s Inn, <a href="#page_006">6</a>, <a href="#page_070">70</a>, <a href="#page_087">87</a>, <a href="#page_089">89</a>, <a href="#page_108">108</a>, <a href="#page_135">135</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_195">195</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Ancients of, <a href="#page_153">153</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">and Barnard’s Inn, <a href="#page_173">173-175</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">and Francis Bacon, <a href="#page_148">148</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">and Queen Elizabeth, <a href="#page_146">146-152</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">and Shakespeare, <a href="#page_148">148</a>, <a href="#page_150">150</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">and Staple Inn, <a href="#page_172">172</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">arms of, <a href="#page_160">160</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">buildings of, <a href="#page_142">142</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Chapel, <a href="#page_144">144</a>, <a href="#page_154">154</a>, <a href="#page_155">155</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Field Court, <a href="#page_159">159</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Fields, <a href="#page_136">136</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Fullwood’s Rents, <a href="#page_162">162</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Gardens, <a href="#page_159">159</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Gateways, <a href="#page_143">143</a>, <a href="#page_144">144</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Hall, <a href="#page_144">144</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Lane, <a href="#page_136">136</a>, <a href="#page_143">143</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Library, <a href="#page_144">144</a>, <a href="#page_145">145</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">masques and plays at, <a href="#page_148">148</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">moots received at, <a href="#page_021">21</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">origin of, <a href="#page_137">137-142</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">pensions and pensioners of, <a href="#page_153">153</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Raymond Buildings, <a href="#page_159">159</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Road, <a href="#page_145">145</a>, <a href="#page_158">158</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">rookery in, <a href="#page_161">161</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">South Square, <a href="#page_143">143</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_157">157</a>, <a href="#page_159">159</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Square, <a href="#page_143">143</a>, <a href="#page_155">155</a>, <a href="#page_156">156</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">surroundings of, <a href="#page_135">135</a>, <a href="#page_136">136</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Verulam Buildings, <a href="#page_158">158</a>, <a href="#page_159">159</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Walks, <a href="#page_162">162</a></span><br />
-
-Grenville, George, <a href="#page_093">93</a><br />
-
-Grey Friars, the, <a href="#page_137">137</a><br />
-
-Greys, the, of Wilton, <a href="#page_137">137</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Griffith, Henry, <a href="#page_147">147</a><br />
-
-Grimthorpe, Lord, <a href="#page_112">112</a>, <a href="#page_118">118</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="H" id="H"></a>Hale, Sir Matthew, <a href="#page_098">98</a>, <a href="#page_118">118</a>, <a href="#page_167">167</a>, <a href="#page_179">179</a><br />
-
-Hallam, Henry, <a href="#page_080">80</a><br />
-
-Halls of the Inns, <a href="#page_011">11</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Hampden, John, <a href="#page_162">162</a><br />
-
-Harcourt, Sir Simon, <a href="#page_098">98</a><br />
-
-Hardwick, Philip, <a href="#page_118">118</a>, <a href="#page_119">119</a>, <a href="#page_128">128</a><br />
-
-Hatton, Sir C., <a href="#page_025">25</a><br />
-
-Havelock, Sir Henry, <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-
-Hawthorne, Nathaniel, <a href="#page_135">135</a><br />
-
-Heath, C. J., <a href="#page_130">130</a><br />
-
-Heber, Bishop, <a href="#page_116">116</a><br />
-
-Herring, Archbishop, <a href="#page_116">116</a><br />
-
-Hogarth, William, <a href="#page_076">76</a>, <a href="#page_104">104</a>, <a href="#page_118">118</a>, <a href="#page_126">126</a><br />
-
-Holborn, <a href="#page_008">8</a>, <a href="#page_131">131</a>, <a href="#page_135">135</a>, <a href="#page_144">144</a>, <a href="#page_195">195</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Bars, <a href="#page_006">6</a>, <a href="#page_007">7</a>, <a href="#page_029">29</a>, <a href="#page_031">31</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Bridge, <a href="#page_108">108</a></span><br />
-
-Hooker, bust of, <a href="#page_055">55</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Dr. John, <a href="#page_058">58</a></span><br />
-
-Hullock, Sir John, <a href="#page_146">146</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="I-i" id="I-i"></a>Inner Temple. See Temple Lane, <a href="#page_087">87</a>, <a href="#page_089">89</a>, <a href="#page_092">92</a><br />
-
-Inns of Chancery, <a href="#page_009">9</a>, <a href="#page_018">18</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">dissolution of, <a href="#page_167">167</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">monopolized by attorneys, <a href="#page_167">167</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">origin of, <a href="#page_165">165</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">relation of Inns of Court to, <a href="#page_166">166-168</a>.</span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">See Barnard’s Inn, Clement’s Inn, Clifford’s Inn, Furnival’s Inn, Lyon’s Inn, New Inn, Staple Inn, Strand Inn, Thavie’s Inn</span><br />
-
-Inns of Court, <a href="#page_061">61-64</a>, <a href="#page_075">75</a>, <a href="#page_106">106</a>, <a href="#page_142">142</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">and the Colonies, <a href="#page_079">79</a>, <a href="#page_080">80</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">a University of Law, <a href="#page_008">8-11</a>, <a href="#page_016">16</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">an aristocratic University, <a href="#page_016">16</a>, <a href="#page_017">17</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">buildings of, <a href="#page_073">73</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_207" id="page_207"></a>{207}</span></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">degrees, discipline, and customs of, <a href="#page_011">11-26</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Feastings, Revels, and Post-Revels, <a href="#page_013">13</a>, <a href="#page_022">22-26</a>, <a href="#page_077">77</a>, <a href="#page_098">98</a>, <a href="#page_117">117</a>, <a href="#page_192">192</a>, <a href="#page_193">193</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Guilds of Study, <a href="#page_009">9</a>, <a href="#page_010">10</a>, <a href="#page_017">17</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Halls, <a href="#page_023">23-26</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">homes of literature, <a href="#page_019">19</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Irish Law-students at the Inns of Court, <a href="#page_020">20</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">masques and plays performed at, <a href="#page_024">24-26</a>, <a href="#page_065">65</a>, <a href="#page_077">77</a>, <a href="#page_089">89</a>, <a href="#page_148">148</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_192">192</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">origin of, <a href="#page_002">2</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Parliaments of, <a href="#page_153">153</a>, <a href="#page_154">154</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">position of, <a href="#page_163">163</a>, <a href="#page_164">164</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">relation of, to Inns of Chancery, <a href="#page_165">165-168</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Volunteers, <a href="#page_129">129</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-
-Ireton, Commissary, <a href="#page_130">130</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="J" id="J"></a>Jeffreys, Lord Chancellor, <a href="#page_055">55</a>, <a href="#page_080">80</a>, <a href="#page_101">101</a><br />
-
-Jessel, Sir George, <a href="#page_185">185</a><br />
-
-Jews, House of the Converted, <a href="#page_181">181</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Johnson, Dr., <a href="#page_062">62</a>, <a href="#page_065">65-67</a>, <a href="#page_069">69</a>, <a href="#page_087">87-89</a>, <a href="#page_173">173</a><br />
-
-Jones, Inigo, <a href="#page_045">45</a>, <a href="#page_114">114</a>, <a href="#page_115">115</a>, <a href="#page_122">122</a>, <a href="#page_127">127</a>, <a href="#page_175">175</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Lieutenant-General, <a href="#page_130">130</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Sir William, <a href="#page_060">60</a></span><br />
-
-Jonson, Ben, <a href="#page_066">66</a>, <a href="#page_112">112</a>, <a href="#page_113">113</a>, <a href="#page_142">142</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="K" id="K"></a>Kenealy, Dr., <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-Kentish Mess (Clifford’s Inn), <a href="#page_180">180</a><br />
-
-King Charles I., <a href="#page_025">25</a>, <a href="#page_076">76</a>, <a href="#page_099">99</a>, <a href="#page_129">129</a>, <a href="#page_130">130</a>, <a href="#page_146">146</a>, <a href="#page_152">152</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Charles II., <a href="#page_127">127</a>, <a href="#page_141">141</a>, <a href="#page_146">146</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Edward I., <a href="#page_033">33</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Ordinance of, <a href="#page_004">4</a>, <a href="#page_186">186</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Edward II., <a href="#page_034">34-36</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Edward VII., <a href="#page_085">85</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">George II., <a href="#page_098">98</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">George III., <a href="#page_133">133</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Henry II., <a href="#page_030">30</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Henry III., <a href="#page_033">33</a>, <a href="#page_181">181</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Ordinance of, <a href="#page_008">8</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Henry VII., <a href="#page_111">111</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Henry VIII., <a href="#page_112">112</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">James I., <a href="#page_040">40</a>, <a href="#page_089">89</a>, <a href="#page_100">100</a>, <a href="#page_136">136</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">patent of, <a href="#page_041">41</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">James II., <a href="#page_146">146</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">John, <a href="#page_033">33</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">William III., <a href="#page_098">98</a></span><br />
-
-King’s Bench Walk, <a href="#page_094">94</a><br />
-
-Kingsley, Charles, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Kinlosse, Lord, <a href="#page_183">183</a><br />
-
-Knights Hospitallers (Order of St. John), <a href="#page_034">34-36</a>, <a href="#page_039">39</a>, <a href="#page_040">40</a>, <a href="#page_047">47</a>, <a href="#page_058">58</a>, <a href="#page_098">98</a><br />
-
-Knights Templars. See Templars, Knights<br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="L" id="L"></a>Lamb, Charles, <a href="#page_029">29</a>, <a href="#page_059">59</a>, <a href="#page_065">65</a>, <a href="#page_082">82</a>, <a href="#page_087">87</a>, <a href="#page_089">89-95</a>, <a href="#page_159">159</a><br />
-
-Lambeth Palace, <a href="#page_112">112</a><br />
-
-Lancaster, Thomas, Earl of, <a href="#page_035">35</a>, <a href="#page_039">39</a>, <a href="#page_040">40</a>, <a href="#page_110">110</a><br />
-
-Law Courts, the, <a href="#page_001">1</a>, <a href="#page_003">3</a>, <a href="#page_008">8</a>, <a href="#page_030">30</a>, <a href="#page_118">118</a>, <a href="#page_177">177</a>, <a href="#page_178">178</a><br />
-
-Leicester, Earl of, <a href="#page_091">91</a><br />
-
-Leigh, Gerard, <a href="#page_099">99</a><br />
-
-Lincoln, Earl of, <a href="#page_107">107</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Lincoln’s Inn, <a href="#page_006">6</a>, <a href="#page_020">20</a>, <a href="#page_029">29</a>, <a href="#page_107">107</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_167">167</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Buildings, <a href="#page_111">111</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Chapel, <a href="#page_113">113-117</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Chaplain of, <a href="#page_114">114-116</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">custom at, <a href="#page_187">187</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Fields, <a href="#page_122">122-128</a>, <a href="#page_131">131</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">No. 13 (Soane Museum), <a href="#page_124">124-126</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">fresco, by Watts, <a href="#page_120">120</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Gateway, <a href="#page_111">111-113</a>, <a href="#page_130">130</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Library, <a href="#page_113">113</a>, <a href="#page_118">118</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">New Hall, <a href="#page_118">118-122</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Square, <a href="#page_122">122</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Old Buildings, <a href="#page_113">113</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Hall, <a href="#page_117">117</a>, <a href="#page_118">118</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">origin of, <a href="#page_107">107-111</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Revels at, <a href="#page_117">117</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Stone Buildings, <a href="#page_118">118</a>, <a href="#page_128">128</a>, <a href="#page_129">129</a></span><br />
-
-Linge, Bernard van, <a href="#page_116">116</a><br />
-
-Lockwood, Sir Frank, <a href="#page_094">94</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_208" id="page_208"></a>{208}</span><br />
-
-London County Council, <a href="#page_045">45</a>, <a href="#page_067">67</a><br />
-
-London, growth of, <a href="#page_001">1</a>, <a href="#page_136">136</a><br />
-
-Louvres, <a href="#page_023">23</a>, <a href="#page_024">24</a>, <a href="#page_076">76</a>, <a href="#page_117">117</a><br />
-
-Lovell, Sir Thomas, <a href="#page_111">111</a>, <a href="#page_112">112</a><br />
-
-Lushington, Stephen, <a href="#page_094">94</a><br />
-
-Lyon’s Inn, <a href="#page_176">176</a><br />
-
-Lyte, Sir Henry Maxwell, <a href="#page_183">183</a><br />
-
-Lyttleton, Edward, Lord, <a href="#page_092">92</a>, <a href="#page_130">130</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Sir Thomas, <a href="#page_092">92</a>, <a href="#page_098">98</a></span><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="M" id="M"></a>Macaulay, Lord, <a href="#page_157">157</a><br />
-
-Mackworth, Dr. John, <a href="#page_173">173</a><br />
-
-Macnaghten, Lord, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Mandeville, Geoffrey, effigy of, <a href="#page_054">54</a><br />
-
-Manningham, John, diary of, <a href="#page_077">77</a><br />
-
-Mansfield, Lord, C.J., <a href="#page_081">81</a>, <a href="#page_103">103</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a>, <a href="#page_131">131</a><br />
-
-Masque of Flowers, the, <a href="#page_152">152</a><br />
-
-Masques and Plays, <a href="#page_024">24-26</a>, <a href="#page_065">65</a>, <a href="#page_089">89</a>, <a href="#page_148">148</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Matthews, Sir Philip, <a href="#page_141">141</a><br />
-
-Maule, Sir John, <a href="#page_093">93</a><br />
-
-Mercers’ Company, the, <a href="#page_175">175</a><br />
-
-Micklethwaite, Dr., <a href="#page_058">58</a><br />
-
-Middle Temple. See Temple, Middle<br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Lane, <a href="#page_067">67</a>, <a href="#page_074">74</a></span><br />
-
-Midsummer Night’s Dream, <a href="#page_148">148</a><br />
-
-Milford Lane, <a href="#page_084">84</a><br />
-
-Molyneux Globes, <a href="#page_079">79</a><br />
-
-Moots, <a href="#page_011">11</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-More, Sir Thomas, <a href="#page_122">122</a>, <a href="#page_175">175</a>, <a href="#page_181">181</a><br />
-
-Museum, Sir John Soane, <a href="#page_124">124-126</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Record Office, <a href="#page_183">183</a>, <a href="#page_184">184</a></span><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="N" id="N"></a>Nethersale, John, <a href="#page_118">118</a><br />
-
-Neville, Sir Thomas, <a href="#page_142">142</a><br />
-
-New Inn, <a href="#page_040">40</a>, <a href="#page_181">181</a><br />
-
-Norths, the, <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-
-Norton, Thomas, <a href="#page_065">65</a>, <a href="#page_099">99</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="O" id="O"></a>O’Connell, Daniel, <a href="#page_020">20</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-‘Old Curiosity Shop,’ the, <a href="#page_126">126-128</a><br />
-
-Ossulston, Manor of, <a href="#page_137">137</a><br />
-
-Overbury, Sir Thomas, <a href="#page_080">80</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="P" id="P"></a>Parvis, the, of St. Paul’s, <a href="#page_191">191</a><br />
-
-Paston Letters, the, <a href="#page_139">139</a><br />
-
-Paulet, Sir Amias, <a href="#page_066">66</a><br />
-
-Pembroke, Earl of, <a href="#page_035">35</a>, <a href="#page_036">36</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Earls of, effigies of, <a href="#page_053">53</a></span><br />
-
-Penn, William, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Perceval, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Petyt, Sylvester, <a href="#page_102">102</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">William, <a href="#page_102">102</a></span><br />
-
-Pitt, William, <a href="#page_113">113</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Plays. See Inns of Court, Masques<br />
-
-Plowden, Edmund, <a href="#page_080">80</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Monument, <a href="#page_056">56</a></span><br />
-
-Poland, Sir Harry, <a href="#page_101">101</a><br />
-
-Pollocks, the, <a href="#page_081">81</a>, <a href="#page_100">100</a><br />
-
-Portpool, Manor of, <a href="#page_137">137</a>, <a href="#page_140">140</a>, <a href="#page_141">141</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Market, <a href="#page_171">171</a></span><br />
-
-Portsmouth, Duchess of, <a href="#page_127">127</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Street, <a href="#page_127">127</a></span><br />
-
-Post-Revels. See Inns of Court, Feasts, etc.<br />
-
-Praed, W. M., <a href="#page_069">69</a><br />
-
-Prudential Assurance Company, <a href="#page_169">169</a>, <a href="#page_170">170</a>, <a href="#page_172">172</a>, <a href="#page_175">175</a>, <a href="#page_176">176</a><br />
-
-Prynne, John, <a href="#page_025">25</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">William, <a href="#page_117">117</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a></span><br />
-
-Pym, John, <a href="#page_077">77</a>, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="Q" id="Q"></a>Queen Anne, <a href="#page_098">98</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Caroline, <a href="#page_098">98</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Elizabeth, <a href="#page_025">25</a>, <a href="#page_078">78</a>, <a href="#page_146">146-152</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Mary, <a href="#page_098">98</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Victoria, <a href="#page_006">6</a>, <a href="#page_119">119</a>, <a href="#page_184">184</a></span><br />
-
-Quincey, Thomas de, <a href="#page_080">80</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="R" id="R"></a>Raleigh, Sir Walter, <a href="#page_078">78</a>, <a href="#page_160">160</a><br />
-
-Raymond, Lord, <a href="#page_146">146</a><br />
-
-Rayner, C. J., <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Readers, <a href="#page_012">12</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Readerships, revived, <a href="#page_020">20</a><br />
-
-Readings, <a href="#page_011">11</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-
-Record Office, the Public, <a href="#page_080">80</a>, <a href="#page_179">179</a>, <a href="#page_182">182-185</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Museum of the, <a href="#page_183">183</a>, <a href="#page_184">184</a></span><br />
-
-Red Cross Knights. <i>See</i> Templars Lion Fields, <a href="#page_143">143</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_209" id="page_209"></a>{209}</span><br />
-
-Revels. See Inns of Court<br />
-
-Reynolds, Sir Joshua, <a href="#page_069">69</a><br />
-
-Robes of the Bar, <a href="#page_193">193</a>, <a href="#page_194">194</a><br />
-
-Rogers, Samuel, <a href="#page_093">93</a><br />
-
-Rolls Chapel, <a href="#page_182">182-185</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Monuments, <a href="#page_183">183</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Master of the, <a href="#page_182">182</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-
-Romilly, Sir Samuel, <a href="#page_132">132</a>, <a href="#page_136">136</a><br />
-
-Roo, John, <a href="#page_150">150</a><br />
-
-Rupert, Prince, <a href="#page_100">100</a><br />
-
-Russell, Lord, <a href="#page_072">72</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="S" id="S"></a>Sackville, Thomas, <a href="#page_065">65</a>, <a href="#page_099">99</a><br />
-
-Savoy, the, <a href="#page_036">36</a><br />
-
-Scott, Sir G., <a href="#page_118">118</a><br />
-
-Scrope’s Inn, <a href="#page_108">108</a>, <a href="#page_195">195</a><br />
-
-Scropes, Le, the, <a href="#page_108">108</a>, <a href="#page_195">195</a>, <a href="#page_196">196</a><br />
-
-Selden, John, <a href="#page_087">87</a>, <a href="#page_093">93</a>, <a href="#page_167">167</a>, <a href="#page_179">179</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">grave of, <a href="#page_055">55</a></span><br />
-
-Serjeants, the, <a href="#page_012">12</a>, <a href="#page_013">13</a>, <a href="#page_186">186</a> <i>ff.</i><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Abolition of the Order of, <a href="#page_194">194</a>, <a href="#page_195">195</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">the, at St. Paul’s, <a href="#page_190">190</a>, <a href="#page_191">191</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Feasts, <a href="#page_192">192</a>, <a href="#page_193">193</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Inn (Chancery&nbsp; Lane), <a href="#page_178">178</a>, <a href="#page_179">179</a>, <a href="#page_197">197-199</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Inn (Fleet Street), <a href="#page_092">92</a>, <a href="#page_196">196</a>, <a href="#page_197">197</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Inns, <a href="#page_012">12</a>, <a href="#page_195">195</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Robes of the, <a href="#page_193">193</a>, <a href="#page_194">194</a></span><br />
-
-Shadwell, William, <a href="#page_080">80</a><br />
-
-Shakespeare, William, <a href="#page_042">42</a>, <a href="#page_043">43</a>, <a href="#page_075">75</a>, <a href="#page_148">148</a>, <a href="#page_150">150</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">at the Temple, <a href="#page_024">24</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">‘Twelfth Night,’ <a href="#page_077">77</a>, <a href="#page_078">78</a></span><br />
-
-Shene, Convent of, <a href="#page_141">141</a><br />
-
-Sheridan, Richard Brinsley, <a href="#page_020">20</a><br />
-
-Shirley, James, <a href="#page_153">153</a><br />
-
-Shoe Lane, <a href="#page_108">108</a><br />
-
-Sidney, Sir Philip, <a href="#page_162">162</a><br />
-
-Skipworth, W., <a href="#page_139">139</a><br />
-
-Smirke, Sir Robert, <a href="#page_198">198</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Sydney, <a href="#page_096">96</a></span><br />
-
-Soane, Sir John, Museum, <a href="#page_124">124-126</a><br />
-
-Solicitors excluded from the Inns of Court, <a href="#page_166">166</a><br />
-
-Somers, Lord Chancellor, <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-
-Somerset, Earl of, <a href="#page_152">152</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">House, <a href="#page_181">181</a></span><br />
-
-Southey, Robert, <a href="#page_163">163</a><br />
-
-Spedding, James, <a href="#page_096">96</a>, <a href="#page_149">149</a>, <a href="#page_151">151</a>, <a href="#page_160">160</a><br />
-
-Spenser, Edmund, <a href="#page_068">68</a>, <a href="#page_069">69</a><br />
-
-St. Anne, Chapel of. See Temple<br />
-
-St. Dunstan’s Church, <a href="#page_178">178</a><br />
-
-St. George’s Inn. See New Inn<br />
-
-St. James’s Palace, <a href="#page_112">112</a><br />
-
-St. John, Oliver, <a href="#page_130">130</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Order of. See Knights Hospitallers</span><br />
-
-St. Paul’s Cathedral, <a href="#page_056">56</a>, <a href="#page_067">67</a>, <a href="#page_137">137</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">the Serjeants and, <a href="#page_189">189-191</a>, <a href="#page_195">195</a></span><br />
-
-St. Thomas, Chapel of. See Temple<br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Knights of, <a href="#page_190">190</a></span><br />
-
-Staple Inn, <a href="#page_087">87</a>, <a href="#page_137">137</a>, <a href="#page_169">169-173</a><br />
-
-Stapleton Inn, <a href="#page_035">35</a><br />
-
-Steele, Richard, <a href="#page_066">66</a><br />
-
-Stowell, Lord, <a href="#page_081">81</a><br />
-
-Strand Inn, <a href="#page_180">180</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">the, <a href="#page_035">35</a>, <a href="#page_177">177</a></span><br />
-
-Strange, Sir John, <a href="#page_183">183</a><br />
-
-Street, <a href="#page_030">30</a>, <a href="#page_178">178</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Architect, <a href="#page_001">1</a></span><br />
-
-Sundials (Temple), <a href="#page_072">72</a>, <a href="#page_073">73</a>, 81 <i>n.</i>, <a href="#page_095">95</a>, <a href="#page_096">96</a><br />
-
-Swift, Dean, <a href="#page_066">66</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="T" id="T"></a>Taylor, Sir Robert, <a href="#page_128">128</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Tom, <a href="#page_090">90</a>, <a href="#page_091">91</a></span><br />
-
-Templars, the Knights, <a href="#page_001">1</a>, <a href="#page_002">2</a>, <a href="#page_027">27</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_048">48</a>, <a href="#page_098">98</a>, <a href="#page_106">106</a>, <a href="#page_171">171</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">and the Serjeants, <a href="#page_188">188</a>, <a href="#page_189">189</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">badge of the, <a href="#page_031">31</a>, <a href="#page_032">32</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">customs of, <a href="#page_097">97</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">decadence and dissolution of the Order of the, <a href="#page_033">33</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">effigies of, <a href="#page_046">46</a>, <a href="#page_051">51-55</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">origin of the Order, <a href="#page_027">27</a>, <a href="#page_028">28</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">settlement in England, <a href="#page_028">28</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-
-Temple, the, <a href="#page_029">29</a>, <a href="#page_110">110</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">a place of sanctuary, <a href="#page_060">60</a>, <a href="#page_061">61</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">attacked by Wat Tyler’s men, <a href="#page_036">36</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_210" id="page_210"></a>{210}</span></span><br />
-
-Temple Bar, <a href="#page_006">6-8</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Chapel of St. Thomas, <a href="#page_059">59</a>, <a href="#page_189">189</a>, <a href="#page_200">200</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Church, the, <a href="#page_044">44-59</a>, <a href="#page_071">71</a>, <a href="#page_074">74</a>, <a href="#page_097">97</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Chapel of St. Anne, <a href="#page_048">48</a>, <a href="#page_189">189</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">dedication of the, <a href="#page_030">30</a>, <a href="#page_031">31</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">description of, <a href="#page_046">46-56</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Master of the, <a href="#page_057">57-59</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Master’s House, <a href="#page_047">47</a>, <a href="#page_057">57</a>, <a href="#page_058">58</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Cloisters, <a href="#page_059">59</a>, <a href="#page_060">60</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Flower Show, <a href="#page_094">94</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Gardens, <a href="#page_006">6</a>, <a href="#page_042">42</a>, <a href="#page_043">43</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">buildings, <a href="#page_074">74</a></span><br />
-
-Temple, Inner, <a href="#page_006">6</a>, <a href="#page_037">37</a>, <a href="#page_086">86</a> <i>ff.</i> See Clifford’s Inn and Temple, Templars<br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Benchers’ Garden, <a href="#page_196">196</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">characteristics of the, <a href="#page_086">86</a>, <a href="#page_087">87</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">charter of the, <a href="#page_040">40</a>, <a href="#page_041">41</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Clock Tower, <a href="#page_097">97</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Cloister Court, <a href="#page_060">60</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">crest of the, <a href="#page_031">31</a>, <a href="#page_032">32</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Crown Office Row, <a href="#page_089">89-91</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Farrar’s Buildings, <a href="#page_089">89</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Feasts, <a href="#page_192">192</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Fig-tree Court, <a href="#page_073">73</a>, <a href="#page_093">93</a>, <a href="#page_094">94</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Garden, <a href="#page_094">94</a>, <a href="#page_095">95</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">gateway, <a href="#page_001">1</a>, <a href="#page_044">44</a>, <a href="#page_045">45</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Gordon Rioters at, <a href="#page_132">132</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Hall, <a href="#page_038">38</a>, <a href="#page_059">59</a>, <a href="#page_065">65</a>, <a href="#page_076">76</a>, <a href="#page_096">96-99</a>, <a href="#page_101">101</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Harcourt Buildings, <a href="#page_074">74</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Hare Court, <a href="#page_068">68</a>, <a href="#page_089">89</a>, <a href="#page_092">92</a>, <a href="#page_093">93</a>, <a href="#page_101">101</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Johnson’s Buildings, <a href="#page_044">44</a>, <a href="#page_087">87</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">King’s Bench Walk, <a href="#page_087">87</a>, <a href="#page_091">91</a>, <a href="#page_102">102-104</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Library, <a href="#page_096">96</a>, <a href="#page_101">101</a>, <a href="#page_102">102</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Mitre Court, <a href="#page_089">89</a>, <a href="#page_092">92</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 3em;">Buildings, <a href="#page_091">91</a>, <a href="#page_092">92</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Paper Buildings, <a href="#page_089">89</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_093">93</a>, <a href="#page_102">102</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Parliament, <a href="#page_018">18</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">rebuilding of, <a href="#page_096">96</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Revels at, <a href="#page_098">98</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">solicitors excluded from, <a href="#page_166">166</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">sundial, Temple Gardens, <a href="#page_095">95</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Tanfield Court, <a href="#page_097">97</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Treasurer’s House, <a href="#page_097">97</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Irishmen at the, <a href="#page_020">20</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Lane, <a href="#page_102">102</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">lawyers first mentioned in, <a href="#page_037">37</a>, <a href="#page_038">38</a></span><br />
-
-Temple, Middle, <a href="#page_006">6</a>, <a href="#page_037">37</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_045">45</a>, <a href="#page_064">64</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_131">131</a>. See Temple, Templars<br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Brick Court, <a href="#page_068">68</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_090">90</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">sundial in, <a href="#page_072">72</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Charter of, <a href="#page_040">40</a>, <a href="#page_041">41</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">crest of the, <a href="#page_031">31</a>, <a href="#page_032">32</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Elizabethan sailors, <a href="#page_078">78</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Elm Court, <a href="#page_071">71</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Buildings, <a href="#page_074">74</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Essex Court, <a href="#page_081">81</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">sundial, 81 <i>n.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Fountain, <a href="#page_075">75</a>, <a href="#page_082">82-84</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">(or Hall) Court, <a href="#page_076">76</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Garden Court, <a href="#page_070">70</a>, <a href="#page_084">84</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Gardens, <a href="#page_084">84</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">gateways, <a href="#page_001">1</a>, <a href="#page_065">65</a> <i>ff.</i>, <a href="#page_074">74</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Goldsmith Buildings, <a href="#page_044">44</a>, <a href="#page_071">71</a>, <a href="#page_089">89</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Hall, <a href="#page_038">38</a>, <a href="#page_068">68</a>, <a href="#page_069">69</a>, <a href="#page_074">74</a> <i>ff.</i></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Lamb Building, <a href="#page_060">60</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Library, <a href="#page_084">84</a>, <a href="#page_085">85</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Little Gateway, <a href="#page_082">82</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">New Court, <a href="#page_082">82</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Parliaments of, <a href="#page_154">154</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Plowden&nbsp; Buildings, <a href="#page_074">74</a>, <a href="#page_084">84</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Pump Court, <a href="#page_073">73</a>, <a href="#page_074">74</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 2em;">sundial in, <a href="#page_073">73</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Rookery, <a href="#page_071">71</a>, <a href="#page_072">72</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Vine Court, <a href="#page_074">74</a></span><br />
-
-Temple, New, site of the, <a href="#page_029">29-31</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Outer, <a href="#page_035">35</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Refectory of the Priests, <a href="#page_059">59</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Stairs, <a href="#page_067">67</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">St. Dunstan, <a href="#page_066">66</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">the Old, <a href="#page_171">171</a></span><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Treasure House, <a href="#page_033">33</a>, <a href="#page_034">34</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_211" id="page_211"></a>{211}</span></span><br />
-
-Temple, ‘Twelfth Night,’ <a href="#page_024">24</a><br />
-
-Temples (Round Churches of the Templars), <a href="#page_028">28</a>, <a href="#page_029">29</a><br />
-
-Thackeray, W. M., quoted, <a href="#page_004">4</a>, <a href="#page_060">60-63</a>, <a href="#page_069">69</a>, <a href="#page_071">71</a>, <a href="#page_090">90</a>, <a href="#page_176">176</a><br />
-
-Thames, Embankment, <a href="#page_067">67</a>, <a href="#page_074">74</a>, <a href="#page_094">94</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">River, <a href="#page_009">9</a>, <a href="#page_029">29</a>, <a href="#page_030">30</a>, <a href="#page_067">67</a>, <a href="#page_068">68</a>, <a href="#page_074">74</a></span><br />
-
-Thavie’s Inn, <a href="#page_005">5</a>, <a href="#page_039">39</a>, <a href="#page_176">176</a><br />
-
-Theobald’s Road, <a href="#page_136">136</a>, <a href="#page_159">159</a><br />
-
-Thomson, Archbishop, <a href="#page_116">116</a><br />
-
-Thurloe, &mdash;, <a href="#page_113">113</a><br />
-
-Thurlow, Edward, Lord Chancellor, <a href="#page_093">93</a>, <a href="#page_094">94</a><br />
-
-Titus Gates, <a href="#page_007">7</a>, <a href="#page_008">8</a><br />
-
-Torrigiano, <a href="#page_183">183</a><br />
-
-Turnstiles, the, <a href="#page_123">123</a><br />
-
-Turton, Sir John, <a href="#page_146">146</a><br />
-
-Tyler, Wat, Rebellion, <a href="#page_036">36</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="V-i" id="V-i"></a>Valence, Aymer de, <a href="#page_035">35</a>, <a href="#page_036">36</a><br />
-
-Virginia, <a href="#page_078">78</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="W" id="W"></a>Walpole, Horace, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Warburton, Bishop, <a href="#page_116">116</a><br />
-
-Warren, Samuel, <a href="#page_104">104</a><br />
-
-Watts, G. F., fresco by, <a href="#page_120">120</a>, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Wellesley, Lord, <a href="#page_117">117</a><br />
-
-Westbury, Lord Chancellor, <a href="#page_021">21</a><br />
-
-Whitefriars, <a href="#page_029">29</a><br />
-
-Whitelock, Bulstrode, <a href="#page_130">130</a><br />
-
-Willes, C.J., <a href="#page_131">131</a>, <a href="#page_194">194</a><br />
-
-William IV., mandate of, <a href="#page_194">194</a><br />
-
-Wine Office Court, <a href="#page_069">69</a><br />
-
-Wither, George, <a href="#page_121">121</a><br />
-
-Wolsey, Cardinal, <a href="#page_112">112</a>, <a href="#page_150">150</a><br />
-
-Wren, Sir Christopher, <a href="#page_002">2</a>, <a href="#page_059">59</a>, <a href="#page_065">65</a>, <a href="#page_082">82</a>, 87 <i>n.</i>, <a href="#page_103">103</a><br />
-<span style="margin-left: 1em;">Temple Bar, <a href="#page_007">7</a></span><br />
-
-Wycherley, William, <a href="#page_080">80</a><br />
-
-<br />
-<a name="Y" id="Y"></a>Yelverton, Sir C., <a href="#page_139">139</a>, <a href="#page_146">146</a><br />
-
-Young, Dr., <a href="#page_183">183</a><br />
-</p>
-
-<p class="c">THE END</p>
-
-<p class="cov"><small>BILLING AND SONS, LTD., PRINTERS, GUILDFORD</small></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_212" id="page_212"></a>{212}</span>&nbsp; </p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="page_213" id="page_213"></a>{213}</span>&nbsp; </p>
-
-<p><a name="ill_021" id="ill_021"></a></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter" style="width: 254px;">
-<a href="images/ill_022_lg.png">
-<img src="images/ill_022_sml.png" width="254" height="500" alt="" /></a>
-<div class="caption"><p>MAP ACCOMPANYING ‘INNS OF COURT.’ BY GORDON HOME AND
-CECIL HEADLAM. (A. AND C. BLACK, LONDON.)</p>
-<a href="images/ill_022_lg.png">[Larger version.]</a>
-<a href="images/ill_022_huge.png">[Largest version.]</a>
-
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnotes"><p class="cb">FOOTNOTES:</p>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> ‘Survey of London.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> Dugdale, ‘Origines Juridiciales.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> Fortescue, ‘De Laudibus Legum.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> Bedwell, <i>Quarterly Review</i>, October, 1908.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> Strype.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> Pollock and Maitland, ‘History of English Law,’ vol. i., p.
-102.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> See my ‘Story of Oxford,’ chap. iv.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Kelly, ‘Short History of the English Bar.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> ‘The Glory of Generosity,’ quoted by Herbert, ‘Aniquities
-of the Inns of Court.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> Kelly, p. 56.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> Kelly, p. 127.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> Bellot, ‘Inner and Middle Temple,’ p. 36.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> Dugdale.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> MS. cited by Addison, ‘Knights Templars,’ p. 348.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> ‘History of the Temple,’ pp. 64-67.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> See Hutchinson, ‘Minutes of Parliament of Middle Temple,’
-vol. i., p. 12.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> An excellent little brochure on No. 17, Fleet Street, is
-published by the L.C.C., and obtainable in ‘Prince Henry’s Council
-Chamber.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> The site is marked by seven large stone slabs. Outside the
-north door of the old Hall stood the Chapel of St. Thomas. It was
-connected with the Cloisters, and thereby with the Chapel of St. Anne or
-with the present main entrance of the Temple Church. Indications of the
-old cloister are traceable in the present Buttery and the ancient
-chamber beneath it. The walls of this chamber are of rubble and Kentish
-rag, and the ceiling is supported by groined arches. Its floor is on the
-same level as that of the ancient Church. There is an open fireplace of
-later date. Mr. Inderwick takes this room to have been the old
-“Refectory of the Priests.”</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> ‘The Temple Church.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> <i>Cf.</i> ‘The Inns of Court and Chancery’ (W. J. Loftie).</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> ‘Origines Juridiciales.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> ‘Sepulchral Monuments,’ vol. i., pp. 24, 50.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> Gough, ‘Sepulchral Monuments.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> Raised 2 feet in 1908, but otherwise unaltered.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> Can only be visited by obtaining an order. It would be
-gracious of the Benchers to relax this restriction.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> Bellot, ‘Inner and Middle Temple.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> Thackeray, ‘Pendennis.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> ‘Pendennis.’ Before migrating to No. 2, Brick Court,
-William Makepeace Thackeray lived at 10, Crown Office Row, probably
-sharing chambers, which have since disappeared, with Tom Taylor.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> ‘Middle Temple Records.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> ‘Life of Wolsey.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_31_31" id="Footnote_31_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_31"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> Bellot, p. 269.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_32_32" id="Footnote_32_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_32"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> ‘English Humourists.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_33_33" id="Footnote_33_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_33"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> See Irving, ‘Goldsmith.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_34_34" id="Footnote_34_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_34"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> Wheatley, ‘Literary Landmarks of London.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_35_35" id="Footnote_35_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_35"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> Vol. v., p. 231.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_36_36" id="Footnote_36_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_36"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> Restored 1903.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_37_37" id="Footnote_37_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_37"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> ‘Diary of John Manningham, of the Middle Temple.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_38_38" id="Footnote_38_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_38"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> <i>Quarterly Review</i>, October, 1908; <i>Green Bag</i>, April,
-1908.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_39_39" id="Footnote_39_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_39"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> Upon the seventeenth-century block, which it replaced,
-there used to be a sundial, which has disappeared. Perhaps its motto,
-‘Vestigia nulla retrorsum,’ was deemed too generous a warning against
-entering upon the perilous paths of litigation.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_40_40" id="Footnote_40_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_40"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> Dickens, ‘Martin Chuzzlewit.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_41_41" id="Footnote_41_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_41"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> Those of Nos. 4 and 5 are attributed to Sir Christopher
-Wren.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_42_42" id="Footnote_42_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_42"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> His portrait, by Van Somer, hangs in the Hall.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_43_43" id="Footnote_43_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_43"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> Inderwick, ‘Inner Temple Records,’ vol. ii., p. lxii.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_44_44" id="Footnote_44_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_44"><span class="label">[44]</span></a> Inderwick, ‘Inner Temple Records,’ vol. i., p. xxiv. <i>Cf.</i>
-p. 48, <i>supra</i>.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_45_45" id="Footnote_45_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45_45"><span class="label">[45]</span></a> Bellot.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_46_46" id="Footnote_46_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46_46"><span class="label">[46]</span></a> The last occasion of a Revel taking place in the Halls of
-the Inns of Court was upon the elevation of Mr. Talbot to the woolsack
-(1734). Then, after dinner, the Benchers all assembled in the Great Hall
-of the Inner Temple, and a large ring having been formed round the
-fireplace, the Master of the Revels took the Lord Chancellor by the
-hand, who with his left took Mr. Justice Page, and the other serjeants
-and benchers being joined together, all danced about the fireplace three
-times, while the ancient song, ‘Round about our Coal Fire,’ accompanied
-by music, was sung by the Comedian, Tony Aston, dressed as a barrister.
-This song of the House has unfortunately been lost.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_47_47" id="Footnote_47_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47_47"><span class="label">[47]</span></a> Bellot, ‘Inner and Middle Temple,’ p. 49.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_48_48" id="Footnote_48_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48_48"><span class="label">[48]</span></a> <i>Notes and Queries</i>, April 2, 1892.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_49_49" id="Footnote_49_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49_49"><span class="label">[49]</span></a> Duchy of Lancaster, Ancient Deeds, L, 137; Close Rolls, 14
-Edward I., M, 2d.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_50_50" id="Footnote_50_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50_50"><span class="label">[50]</span></a> Quoted by Stow.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_51_51" id="Footnote_51_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51_51"><span class="label">[51]</span></a> Loftie, p. 53.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_52_52" id="Footnote_52_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52_52"><span class="label">[52]</span></a> Dugdale.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_53_53" id="Footnote_53_53"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53_53"><span class="label">[53]</span></a> ‘Life of Dr. Donne,’ by Izaak Walton.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_54_54" id="Footnote_54_54"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54_54"><span class="label">[54]</span></a> ‘Black Book of Lincoln’s Inn.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_55_55" id="Footnote_55_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_55"><span class="label">[55]</span></a> <i>Ibid.</i></p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_56_56" id="Footnote_56_56"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56_56"><span class="label">[56]</span></a> Loftie.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_57_57" id="Footnote_57_57"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57_57"><span class="label">[57]</span></a> Cf. <i>Daily Telegraph</i>, January 4, 1909.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_58_58" id="Footnote_58_58"></a><a href="#FNanchor_58_58"><span class="label">[58]</span></a> Kelly, ‘Short History of the English Bar.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_59_59" id="Footnote_59_59"></a><a href="#FNanchor_59_59"><span class="label">[59]</span></a> Stow, vol. i., p. 11; ed. Kingsford.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_60_60" id="Footnote_60_60"></a><a href="#FNanchor_60_60"><span class="label">[60]</span></a> Douthwaite, ‘Notes on Gray’s Inn,’ 1876.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_61_61" id="Footnote_61_61"></a><a href="#FNanchor_61_61"><span class="label">[61]</span></a> Luttrell’s ‘Diary,’ June 10, 1684, quoted by Douthwaite.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_62_62" id="Footnote_62_62"></a><a href="#FNanchor_62_62"><span class="label">[62]</span></a> Douthwaite, p. 175.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_63_63" id="Footnote_63_63"></a><a href="#FNanchor_63_63"><span class="label">[63]</span></a> Enumerated by Douthwaite, ‘Gray’s Inn,’ 1886, and, with
-plates, by Dugdale.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_64_64" id="Footnote_64_64"></a><a href="#FNanchor_64_64"><span class="label">[64]</span></a> <i>Cf.</i> Professor A. V. Dicey, in the <i>Nineteenth Century</i>,
-September, 1903.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_65_65" id="Footnote_65_65"></a><a href="#FNanchor_65_65"><span class="label">[65]</span></a> Spedding, ‘Life and Letters of Francis Bacon.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_66_66" id="Footnote_66_66"></a><a href="#FNanchor_66_66"><span class="label">[66]</span></a> Halliwell-Phillipps, ‘Outlines of the Life of
-Shakespeare,’ p. 104.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_67_67" id="Footnote_67_67"></a><a href="#FNanchor_67_67"><span class="label">[67]</span></a> <i>Op. cit.</i>, vol. i., p. 342.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_68_68" id="Footnote_68_68"></a><a href="#FNanchor_68_68"><span class="label">[68]</span></a> ‘Master Worsley’s Book’&mdash;Observations on the Constitution,
-etc., of the Middle Temple. Written, 1733.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_69_69" id="Footnote_69_69"></a><a href="#FNanchor_69_69"><span class="label">[69]</span></a> To commemorate the centenary of this date a bronze statue
-of the Philosopher is shortly to be placed in the centre of the grass
-plot in South Square.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_70_70" id="Footnote_70_70"></a><a href="#FNanchor_70_70"><span class="label">[70]</span></a> W. J. Broderip, <i>Fraser’s Magazine</i>, 1857.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_71_71" id="Footnote_71_71"></a><a href="#FNanchor_71_71"><span class="label">[71]</span></a> <i>Cf.</i> <i>Edinburgh Review</i>, vol. cxxxiv., p. 488.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_72_72" id="Footnote_72_72"></a><a href="#FNanchor_72_72"><span class="label">[72]</span></a> ‘Calendar of Inner Temple Records,’ vol. i., p. xiii.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_73_73" id="Footnote_73_73"></a><a href="#FNanchor_73_73"><span class="label">[73]</span></a> Historical MSS. Commission, XII., part i., vol. i., p.
-60.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_74_74" id="Footnote_74_74"></a><a href="#FNanchor_74_74"><span class="label">[74]</span></a> By a charter of Edward IV., 1463, the Staple of wools was
-set at Leadenhall.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_75_75" id="Footnote_75_75"></a><a href="#FNanchor_75_75"><span class="label">[75]</span></a> <i>Cf.</i> ‘Staple Inn,’ by E. Williams, F.R.G.S., p. 100.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_76_76" id="Footnote_76_76"></a><a href="#FNanchor_76_76"><span class="label">[76]</span></a> Douthwaite, p. 257.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_77_77" id="Footnote_77_77"></a><a href="#FNanchor_77_77"><span class="label">[77]</span></a> <i>Notes and Queries</i>, April 2, 1892.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_78_78" id="Footnote_78_78"></a><a href="#FNanchor_78_78"><span class="label">[78]</span></a> A full descriptive catalogue, drawn up by Sir Henry
-Maxwell Lyte, is obtainable at the Public Record Office.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_79_79" id="Footnote_79_79"></a><a href="#FNanchor_79_79"><span class="label">[79]</span></a> ‘Black Books of Lincoln’s Inn,’ vol. i., p. xxxix.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_80_80" id="Footnote_80_80"></a><a href="#FNanchor_80_80"><span class="label">[80]</span></a> See Serjeant Pulling, ‘The Order of the Coif.’</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_81_81" id="Footnote_81_81"></a><a href="#FNanchor_81_81"><span class="label">[81]</span></a> <i>Notes and Queries</i>, April 2, 1892.</p></div>
-
-<div class="footnote"><p><a name="Footnote_82_82" id="Footnote_82_82"></a><a href="#FNanchor_82_82"><span class="label">[82]</span></a> Fetter Lane is said to be derived from ‘Fewters,’ as the
-abode of vagrants, cheats, and fortune-tellers.</p></div>
-
-</div>
-
-<p class="figcenter">
-<img src="images/back.jpg" height="500" style="border:none;" alt="[Image
-of the book's back unavailable.]" />
-</p>
-
-<hr class="full" />
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-<pre>
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Inns of Court, by Cecil Headlam
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE INNS OF COURT ***
-
-***** This file should be named 55062-h.htm or 55062-h.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/5/5/0/6/55062/
-
-Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images available at The Internet Archive)
-
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
-will be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
-one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
-(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
-permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
-set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
-copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
-protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
-Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
-charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
-do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
-rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
-such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
-research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
-practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
-subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
-redistribution.
-
-
-
-*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
-http://gutenberg.org/license).
-
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
-all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
-If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
-terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
-entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
-and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
-or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
-collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
-individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
-located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
-copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
-works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
-are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
-Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
-freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
-this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
-the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
-keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
-Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
-a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
-the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
-before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
-creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
-Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
-the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
-States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
-access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
-whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
-copied or distributed:
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
-almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
-re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
-with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
-from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
-posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
-and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
-or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
-with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
-work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
-through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
-Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
-1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
-terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
-to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
-permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
-word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
-distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
-"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
-posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
-you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
-copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
-request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
-form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
-that
-
-- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
- owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
- has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
- Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
- must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
- prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
- returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
- sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
- address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
- the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or
- destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
- and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
- Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
- money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
- of receipt of the work.
-
-- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
-forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
-both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
-Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
-Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
-collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
-"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
-corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
-property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
-computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
-your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
-your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
-the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
-refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
-providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
-receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
-is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
-opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
-WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
-WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
-If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
-law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
-interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
-the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
-provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
-with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
-promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
-harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
-that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
-or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
-work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
-Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
-
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
-including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
-because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
-people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
-To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
-and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
-Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
-http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
-permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
-Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
-throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
-809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
-business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
-information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
-page at http://pglaf.org
-
-For additional contact information:
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
-SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
-particular state visit http://pglaf.org
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
-To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
-
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
-works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
-with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
-Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
-
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
-unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
-keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
-
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
-
- http://www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-
-
-</pre>
-
-</body>
-</html>
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/back.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/back.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 4a881b4..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/back.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/colophon.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/colophon.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index c81d86c..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/colophon.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/cover.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 6149c32..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/cover.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/cover_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/cover_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index bdc1899..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/cover_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_001_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_001_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index f104ead..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_001_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_001_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_001_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 0b96ab5..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_001_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_003_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_003_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 2212562..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_003_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_003_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_003_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 45474ac..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_003_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_004_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_004_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index c5aa2af..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_004_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_004_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_004_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index d6c138f..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_004_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_005_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_005_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 0c356ee..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_005_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_005_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_005_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 51426b0..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_005_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_006_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_006_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index dbf2496..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_006_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_006_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_006_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index f63cfa0..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_006_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_007_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_007_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 8bfd8d7..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_007_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_007_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_007_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index de4191c..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_007_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_008_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_008_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index d24a99c..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_008_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_008_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_008_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index db9c83d..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_008_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_009_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_009_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 5b4f4ef..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_009_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_009_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_009_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 2d053b8..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_009_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_010_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_010_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 9663319..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_010_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_010_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_010_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 9ca28d2..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_010_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_011_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_011_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 467e185..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_011_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_011_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_011_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 2889e93..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_011_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_012_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_012_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index c6956a0..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_012_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_012_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_012_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 9dd5c17..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_012_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_013_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_013_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 0b065ed..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_013_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_013_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_013_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 88fbcf6..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_013_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_014_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_014_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index f1d5789..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_014_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_014_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_014_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 5b199b6..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_014_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_015_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_015_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 3ae11fa..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_015_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_015_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_015_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index cfc84c2..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_015_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_016_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_016_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index da64524..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_016_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_016_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_016_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 21603b9..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_016_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_017_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_017_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 49626e8..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_017_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_017_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_017_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 7f95721..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_017_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_018_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_018_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 72e0b45..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_018_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_018_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_018_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 3d10d65..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_018_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_019_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_019_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 177a958..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_019_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_019_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_019_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 8c38743..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_019_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_020_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_020_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 672cdb8..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_020_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_020_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_020_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 0aaa2be..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_020_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_021_lg.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_021_lg.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 19d7d3c..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_021_lg.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_021_sml.jpg b/old/55062-h/images/ill_021_sml.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 973b3ed..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_021_sml.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_022_huge.png b/old/55062-h/images/ill_022_huge.png
deleted file mode 100644
index c2761ae..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_022_huge.png
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_022_lg.png b/old/55062-h/images/ill_022_lg.png
deleted file mode 100644
index e57495a..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_022_lg.png
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/55062-h/images/ill_022_sml.png b/old/55062-h/images/ill_022_sml.png
deleted file mode 100644
index 5afd31c..0000000
--- a/old/55062-h/images/ill_022_sml.png
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ