summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--7175-0.txt1303
-rw-r--r--7175-0.zipbin0 -> 26274 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
5 files changed, 1319 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/7175-0.txt b/7175-0.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..25e9cdb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/7175-0.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1303 @@
+Project Gutenberg's The Tattva-Muktavali, by Purnananda Chakravartin
+
+Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the
+copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing
+this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook.
+
+This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project
+Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the
+header without written permission.
+
+Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the
+eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is
+important information about your specific rights and restrictions in
+how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a
+donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved.
+
+
+**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts**
+
+**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971**
+
+*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!*****
+
+
+Title: The Tattva-Muktavali
+
+Author: Purnananda Chakravartin
+
+Release Date: December, 2004 [EBook #7175]
+[Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule]
+[This file was first posted on March 21, 2003]
+
+Edition: 10
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE TATTVA-MUKTAVALI ***
+
+
+
+
+Originally scanned at sacred-texts.com by John B. Hare.
+This eBook was produced by Chetan K. Jain
+
+
+
+THE TATTVA-MUKTAVÂLÎ
+
+
+by Pûr.nânanda Chakravartin
+
+
+
+
+JOURNAL
+
+OF
+
+THE ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY.
+
+
+
+[New Series, Volume XV]
+
+
+[London, Trübner and Company]
+
+[1883]
+
+
+{Scanned and edited by Christopher M. Weimer, April 2002}
+
+
+
+ART. IV.--__The Tattva-muktavâlî of Gau.da-pûr.nânanda-chakra-
+vartin__. Edited and Translated by Prof. E. B. COWELL.
+
+
+The following poem was written by a native of Bengal, named
+Pûr.nânanda Chakravartin. Nothing is known as to his date; if
+the work were identical with the poem of the same name mentioned
+in the account of the Râmânuja system in Mâdhava's
+Sarvadaršanasa.mgraha, it would be, of course, older than the
+fourteenth century, but this is very uncertain; I should be
+inclined to assign it to a later date. The chief interest of the
+poem consists in its being a vigorous attack on the Vedânta
+system by a follower of the Pûr.naprajña school, which was
+founded by Madhva (or Ânandatîrtha) in the thirteenth century in
+the South of India. Some account of his system (which in many
+respects agrees with that of Râmânuja) is given in Wilson's
+"Hindu Sects;" [Footnote: Works, vol. i. pp. 139-150. See also
+Prof. Monier Williams, J.R.A.S. Vol. XIV. N.S. p. 304.] but the
+fullest account is to be found in the fifth chapter of the
+Sarvadaršanasa.mgraha. Both the Râmânujas and the Pûr.naprajñas
+hold in opposition to the Vedânta [Footnote: As the different
+systems are arranged in the Sarva D. S. according to the
+irrespective relation to the Vedânta, we can easily understand why
+Mâdhava there places these two systems so low down in the scale,
+and only just above the atheistic schools of the Chârvâkas,
+Buddhists, and Jainas.] that individual souls are distinct from
+Brahman; but they differ as to the sense in which they are thus
+distinct. The former maintain that "unity" and "plurality" are
+equally true from different points of view; the latter hold that
+the relation between the individual soul and Brahman is that of a
+master and a servant, and consequently that they are absolutely
+separate. It need not surprise us, therefore, to see that,
+although Râmânuja is praised in the fifty-third sloka of this
+poem as "the foremost of the learned," some of his tenets are
+attacked in the eightieth.
+
+The Sanskrit text of this poem was published in the Benares
+Pa.n.dit for Sept. 1871, by Pa.n.dit Vechârâma Šarman. An edition,
+with a Bengali translation, was also published some years ago in
+Calcutta, by Jagadânanda Goswâmin; [Footnote: No date is given.]
+but the text is so full of false readings of every kind, and the
+translation in consequence goes so often astray, that I have not
+found much help from it. I have collated the text in the Benares
+Pa.n.dit (A.) with a MS. (B.) sent to me by my friend, Pa.n.dit
+Mahešachandra Nyâyaratna, the Principal of the Calcutta Sanskrit
+College. He has also sent me the readings in certain passages from
+two MSS. in the Calcutta Sanskrit College Library (C.D.); and I
+have to thank him for his help in explaining some obscure allusions.
+
+The poem itself seems to me an interesting contribution to the
+history of Hindu philosophical controversy, [Footnote: Dr. Banerjea
+has quoted and translated several stanzas in his 'Dialogues on Hindu
+Philosophy.'] and so I have subjoined a literal English translation.
+I would venture to remind my readers of the words of the manager in
+the prologue of the Mâlavikâgnimitra, "Every old poem is not good
+because it is old, nor is every modern poem to be blamed simply
+because it is modern."
+
+
+
+TRANSLATION.
+
+
+1. Victorious is the garland-wearing foster-son of Nanda,--the
+protector of his devotees,--the destroyer of the cruel king,--
+dark-blue like the delicate tamâla blossoms,--formidable with his
+many outspread rays,--mighty with all his attendant powers,
+[Footnote: The Bengali translation explains these as the internal
+powers (__antara"ngâ__) Hlâdinî, etc., and the external
+(__bahira"ngâ__) Prahvâ, etc.]--and having his forehead radiant
+like the moon.
+
+2. This follower of the Purâ.nas, who holds by his own belief,
+reads to his heart's content the Purâ.na in the morning, and he
+listens devotedly with profound meditation, his whole mind intent
+on the meaning of the book.
+
+3. Having abandoned the doctrine of the oneness of the individual
+and the Supreme Soul, he establishes by argument their mutual
+difference; having used Šruti and Šm.riti as a manifold proof, he
+employs Inference in many ways in the controversy.
+
+4. This individual soul must be different from Brahman because it
+is always circumscribed,--many are the similar arguments which are
+to be acknowledged in the course of our reasonings.
+
+5. "Might we not say that a jar and a web could be called identical
+because both are cognizable?" [Footnote: There is a favourite
+Naiyâyik example of a __kevalânvayi__ middle term, "a jar is
+nameable because it is cognizable as a web is."] But we cannot say
+so in regard to these two things in question, for Brahman alone is
+that which cannot be cognized.
+
+6. The sentence "Thou art That" (__tat tvam asi__) which is
+understood in its primary meaning as referring to the object of the
+Veda, [Footnote: Or __vedavishaye__ may perhaps simply mean __vede__,
+cf. šl. 112.]--the author thus explains its meaning, as he knows his
+own doctrine, and has fixed his mind on the system of Duality; since
+the word 'that' (__tat__) is here indeclinable and implies a
+difference, and the word 'thou' (__tvam__) means that which is to be
+differentiated, the sign of the genitive case has been elided;
+[Footnote: The author here explains the sentence __tat tvam asi__, as
+really meaning __tasya tvam asi__ "thou art Its."] "thou only," such
+is not the meaning of the sentence [Footnote: In "Thou art that,"
+'thou' and 'that' would refer to the same subject
+(__sâmânâdhikara.nya__)].
+
+7. He is all-knowing, all-seeing, Himself the three worlds, in whose
+belly thou art thyself contained,--He causes at once by a movement of
+the brow the creation, preservation, and absorption of all beings!
+Thou art ignorant, and only seest relatively, He is the adorable, the
+one Witness of all worlds; thou art changing, He is One; thou art all
+dull and stained, not such is He.
+
+8. As for the text "I am Brahman," you must take the nominative case
+as only used there for the genitive by the licence of an inspired
+speaker. How, if it were otherwise, would there be a genitive in the
+illustration, [Footnote: This is often used as an illustration in
+Vedânta works, as __e.g.__ B.rihad Âra.ny. Up. ii. 1. 20, "as the
+spider proceeds with his web, as the little sparks proceed from fire,
+so from this Soul proceed all vital airs, all worlds, all gods, all
+beings."] as in the sentence "as the sparks of the fire"?
+
+9. The poets call a lad fire (from his hot temper), the face the orb
+of a full moon, the eye a blue lotus, the bosom mount Meru, and the
+hand a young shoot; by a confusion of the superimposed appearance we
+may thus have the idea of identity where there is still a real
+difference; and so too must we deal with those words of Šruti "I am
+Brahman." [Footnote: This is another suggested method of interpreting
+the words "I am Brahman." It may be only a common case of "qualified
+superimponent indication," as "the man of the Panjâb is an ox" (cf.
+Kâvya Prakâša, ii. 10-12). Cf. the definition of upachâra in the
+Sâhitya Darpa.na: __upachâro hi nâmâtyanta.m višakalitayoh
+šâd.rišyâtišayamahimnâ bhedapratîtisthaganamâtram__].
+
+10. As there are many waves in the sea, so are we many individual
+souls in Brahman; the wave can never become the sea; how then wilt
+thou, the individual soul, become Brahman?
+
+11. In the depths of all Šâstras the two things are both recognized,
+knowledge and ignorance; so too virtue and vice; and thus also
+science, and next to it closely clinging behind, but other than it,
+appears false science; thus everywhere there are opposite pairs, and
+similar is the notorious pair, Brahman and the soul. How can these
+two have oneness? Let the good answer with an upright mind.
+
+12. Thou, O Soul, art the reflection of the Supreme Being, who
+possesses the power of illusion and is the substratum of all, while
+He, the adorable, shines forth as Himself the original; the one moon
+in the sky is seen manifold in water and the like; therefore there
+is a difference between thee and Brahman as between the reflection
+and its original.
+
+13. Yonder Brahman is described by the words of the sacred texts as
+not to be known, nor to be reasoned about, and as devoid of all
+desire; but thou art within the range of speech and of thought; how
+shall there be oneness of thee and Brahman?
+
+14. Thou art verily bereft of thy understanding, O individual Soul,
+by the darkness of this doctrine of Mâyâ, while thou constantly
+proclaimest like a madman "I am Brahman"; where is thy sovereignty,
+where thy empire, where thy omniscience? There is as vast a
+difference between Brahman and thee as between mount Meru and a
+mustard-seed!
+
+15. Thou art a finite soul, He is indeed all-pervading; thou
+standest only on one spot, while He is everywhere always; thou,
+being of a moment, art happy and unhappy; He is happy at all times;
+how canst thou say "I am He"? Fie! art thou not ashamed?
+
+16. Glass is glass, and a gem is a gem; a shell is but a shell,
+and silver is silver; there is never seen a transposition
+[Footnote: Dr. Banerjea (__Dialogues__, p. 379) reads __kadâpy
+atyayajñânam, i.e.__ vyabhichâra; but all the MSS. which I have
+compared read __na kadâ vyatyaya__ (or __vyatyaya.m__) __jñânam;
+kadâ__ seems irregularly used for __kadâpi__, as it is also in
+šl. 113, __c.__] among them. But wherever other things are
+imagined, to be found in something else, it is through an error;
+and so it is when the soul utters such words as "that art thou!"
+
+17. The meaning of the word "__that__" (__tat__) is an ocean of
+immortality, filled with manifest and supreme felicity; the
+meaning of the word "__thou__" is a most miserable being,
+bewildered in mind through the burden of the fear of existence;
+these two can never be one, they are divided by the nature of
+things; the doctrine of Non-unity is the truth for all worlds,
+thou art but His slave.
+
+18. If Brahman were meant by these words, the power employed
+would not be Denotation, for their literal meaning does not apply;
+[Footnote: In such sentences as "That art thou," "I am Brahman,"
+etc., the primary power of the words, __i.e.__ " Denotation"
+(__abhidhâ__), could not express the unconditioned Brahman
+destitute of all attributes; for Denotation rests upon the ordinary
+conventional meaning, and how could this take in an idea so far
+removed from ordinary experience? Nor could it be the secondary
+power "Indication" (__laksha.nâ__), as in the well- known instance
+of "the herd-station on the Ganges," where the Ganges, by
+"indication," means the shore and not the stream. For "indication"
+must be based on some connexion between the primary and the
+indicated secondary meaning; but how can that which is "without a
+second" be connected with anything?] consequently it must be the
+second power of a word, Indication.
+
+19. Yet if so, why should it be Indication? for this arises from
+some association with the primary meaning; but with what can that
+substance be associated which is disconnected with everything and
+without a second?
+
+20. That power of a word is Indication, by which, when the primary
+meaning is precluded, some other meaning is indicated in connexion
+therewith, through some motive or through common currency; and its
+causes are thus three [Footnote: I suppose that these are (1) the
+incompatibility of the primary sense; (2) the common currency of the
+secondary meaning, __e.g.__ when "Europe" is used to imply its
+inhabitants in the phrase "Europe makes war:" (3) a motive, as in
+"a herd-station on the Ganges," where "Ganges" is used instead of
+"the bank of the Ganges," in order to imply the coolness and purity
+of the spot].
+
+21. Now if there is no Denotation in a phrase, how can there arise
+any Indication? First there should be some primary meaning
+precluded, and then there may be the Indication of something else.
+
+22. Where there is no accepted Denotation, how can you there have
+Indication? If there is no village, how can there be a boundary?--
+there is no child without a father [Footnote: Cf. the Bengali proverb
+__mâthâ nâi târ mâthâbyathâ__, "he has no head and yet he has a
+headache."]
+
+23. "The lances enter, the swords, the bows and arrows,"--here we
+have Indication; for the sentence must suggest something else to
+complete itself, as there cannot be "entrance" in the case of an
+inanimate subject.
+
+24. "A herd-station on the Ganges,"--here we have the self-sacrifice
+of the primary to another meaning, since the Ganges, as being in the
+form of water, cannot be the site of a herd-station.
+
+25. In the example "ghî is life" there is produced the idea of
+sameness of form; in the example "this is life" there arises the
+idea of identity [Footnote: In the first ex. there is __šuddha-
+sâropa-laksha.nâ__ or "pure superimponent indication," in the second
+there is __šuddha-sâdhyavasâna-l.__ or "pure introspeceptive
+indication," where the ghî is swallowed up in the "life." Most
+writers, however, disallow __upachâra__ in __šuddha-laksha.nâ__];
+but the knowledge of the meaning of the sentences will be produced
+by a metaphor,--there is not brought about a real oneness.
+
+26. The doctrine of Identity is established with a desperate effort,
+and men have recourse to the power "Indication"; but there are three
+things which should rise to our view,--the primary meaning, the
+indicated meaning, and their connexion [Footnote: He seems to imply
+that each of these three requisites fails in the present case,--
+there is no primary meaning, and still less a secondary, and there is
+no connexion with any other object.].
+
+27. There is here no Denotation from the absence of conventional
+agreement; there is no Indication from the absence of any reason [to
+establish it]; by what reason, on the theory of Mâyâ, can Brahman be
+ever made known?
+
+28. He is described [Footnote: He now proceeds to declare his own
+opinions] in the Veda by the primary power of words [Denotation] as
+the Maker of the Universe; and by Inference we establish the
+conclusion that all these things have a Maker.
+
+29. The Vedas are a proof, the Šm.ritis are a proof; there is a being
+to be proved and known there in many passages; it is the great
+Personality which is to be made known by all the Vedas,--therefore it
+is this which the Veda takes as its subject.
+
+30. True verbal testimony produces knowledge even in regard to that
+which is absolutely non-existent,--then how much more in regard to
+Brahman the Lord, the maker of all that moves or is motionless!
+
+31. It is said, [Footnote: Taitt. Upanish. ii. 4.] "Speech retires
+therefrom together with the Mind,"--but this is its explanation,--
+give ear: Together with the Mind Speech makes Him its object, and
+then retires, because His nature is not to be fathomed.
+
+32. "Brahman is not to be made the object of mind or of words,"
+[Footnote: Cf. the Ka.tha Up. vi. 12, "The soul is not to be reached
+by speech nor by the mind nor by the eye."]--from this saying it is
+understood that he is only to be declared by Revelation, Revelation
+has no faltering action [Footnote: For __skhaladgati__, cf.
+__Kâvyaprakâša__, ii. 16.].
+
+33. "He who is versed in the Word-Brahman attains to the highest
+Brahman," [Footnote: This line is quoted from Šruti in the Maitri
+Upanishad, vi. 22.]--surely such words of inspired sages are not
+mistaken babble.
+
+34. Assuredly the conventional meaning of the words "existent,"
+"thought," and "joy" applies to Brahman, just as the words "pot,"
+"cloth," etc., refer to those particular objects.
+
+35. The perception of the conventional meaning of words is aroused
+by the dialogue of the orderer and the ordered; and afterwards by
+insertion and omission the child becomes thoroughly skilled in the
+use of the words. [Footnote: Cf. Sâhityadarpa.na, ii. "On the old
+man's saying, when giving directions to the middle-aged man," etc.
+The Sâhitya D. uses the terms __âvâpoddhârau__, the
+Siddhântamuktâvalî (p. 80) uses __âvâpodvâpan__].
+
+36. So through hearing the words of the teacher and repeated study
+of the šâstras the conventional meaning of such words as Brahman,
+etc., is assuredly produced in the pupil.
+
+37. This earth must surely have had a maker; for its having the
+nature of an effect is a sign, just as we see to be the case in
+pots, etc.
+
+38. If it is established that the supreme Lord is the maker, then
+his having a body follows as a matter of course [Footnote: This is
+one of the tenets of Râmânujas as well as Pûr.naprajñas.]; for in
+all effects, as pots and the like, the maker is seen to have a body
+and not to be bodiless.
+
+39. [The objector urges] "If the supreme Lord has a body, then he
+will be like to beings such as we are; there cannot be a maker
+without an intermediate agency [Footnote: The __vyâpâra__ or
+intermediate agency is defined as __taj-janyatve sati taj-janya-
+janako hi vyâpâra.h__],--I see no difference whatever."
+
+40. But great is the difference which is declared to exist between
+the Adorable Lord and men working with spades, sickles, ploughshares,
+and hands; these are helpless in the six waves [Footnote: Compare
+the memorial line, __Šokamohau jarâm.rityû kshutpipâse
+sha.dûrmaya.h__.] (of human infirmity,) and wearied with the burden
+of labour,--He effects everything by a mere motion of his brow.
+
+41. The Master can make, not make [Footnote: With this curious use
+of __akartum__ (extending the analogy of such forms as __akurvan,
+ak.ritvâ__, etc.) cf. Theognis, 621: {Greek: __pas tis ploúsion
+ándpa tíei atíei dè penixrón__}. Cf. Shilleto, Cambridge Journ. of
+Philology, 1876, p. 161.], and alter; hence one may learn that vast
+is the interval between the two.
+
+42. If the body is called the site of enjoyment, it is well known
+that this definition will hold good (even in this highest case
+[Footnote: Could __loke__ mean that it will hold good "of the world"
+as his body?]),--there is nothing deficient but everything is present
+in the Lord's body [Footnote: Cf. "Whose body nature is and God the
+soul."], since He is the husband of Lakshmî.
+
+43. "Every body is influenced by deserts,"--if this universal law is
+accepted, then He who is the Maker of all must be impelled [to create
+the world] by the deserts which dominate over beings like us
+[Footnote: __I.e.__ he creates the world to give their deserts to the
+different souls.]
+
+44. "Every body must be non-eternal,"--this is a general law, yet
+still Κvara's body may be eternal; for earth is everywhere seen to
+be non-eternal, while in the form of its atoms it is eternal.
+
+45. One must not say, "why should the desert of one attach itself to
+another?" For it was in consequence of the respective merits and
+demerits of the elephant and the crocodile that the holder of the
+discus made all haste to interfere in the battle [Footnote: The
+objector urges "why should our good or evil deserts oblige God to
+act in a certain way?" He answers by referring to the well-known
+legend given in the Bhâgavata Purâ.na, viii. ch. 2-4. A certain
+king, named Indradyumna, became an elephant through Agastya's curse.
+One day, while drinking in a lake, he was seized by a crocodile, and
+the struggle lasted for a thousand years. At last, in despair, he
+prayed to Vish.nu, who came down mounted on Garu.da and killed the
+crocodile. Thus we see that, although in one sense the deserts of one
+being cannot attach themselves to another, still they must cause
+certain actions in another being, or it would be impossible that each
+should receive its due reward or punishment.]
+
+46. It has been heard of old that all this universe proceeded from
+the lotus of the navel of the Lord; hence is it established that be
+has a body, for how can there be a navel without a body?
+
+47. The body of God is very pure,--to be enjoyed by all the senses,
+as being richly endowed with the six qualities [Footnote: These six
+qualities, according to the Commentator on the Bhâgavata P. i. 3. 36,
+are sovereignty, knowledge, glory, prosperity, dispassion, and
+virtue; a different list is given in the Sarva Darš. S. p. 54, l. 22
+(but cf. p. 69, l. 18). See also __infra__ in šl. 95.],--and to be
+discovered by means of all the Vedas,--Gangâ verily is the water
+wherewith he washes his feet.
+
+48. Whenever by the influence of time there comes the increase of evil
+and the diminution of right, then the adorable Lord accomplishes the
+preservation of the good and the destruction of the wicked.
+
+49. The Lord is said to be twofold, as the Incarnation and He who
+becomes incarnate; so too the souls are twofold, as divided into
+faithful and faithless.
+
+50. Now some say that the personal soul is only the reflection of the
+Supreme; but their opinion does not at all hold, since it cannot be
+established.
+
+51. For how could there arise a reflection of that Infinite and
+stainless one? and how could an insentient [reflection] enjoy the pain
+and pleasure arising from the merit and demerit declared in the Veda?
+
+52. There may indeed be a reflection of that which is limited; but how
+shall there be one of Him whose attribute is infinity?
+
+53. Râmânuja, the foremost of the learned, condemned this theory of an
+original and its reflection; the fact that this doctrine is not
+accepted by the learned, will not make it seem more plausible.
+
+54. There is an eternal division between the two, from the words of
+the Veda, "two birds;" [Footnote: Rig V. i. 164, 20, "Two birds
+associated together, two friends, take refuge in the same tree; one
+of them eats the sweet fig; the other, abstaining from food, merely
+looks on."] from the mention there of "two friends," how can there
+be identity between them?
+
+55. I become Brahman, that is, I cease to have mundane existence
+through beholding the soul in Brahman; the result of this would be
+the abolition of sorrow, etc., but in no way absolute Oneness.
+
+56. I become Brahman also through beholding Brahman in the soul
+[Footnote: Another reading is __brahma.ny âtmanirîksha.nât__]; the
+result would be the abolition of His being out of sight [Footnote:
+__I.e.__ it would be always __videre videntem__], but in no way
+Oneness.
+
+57. It must not be said that by continued meditation with intent
+thought a man becomes Brahman; there will only enter into him a
+little merit; as we see indeed in the case of worms, bees, and the
+like [Footnote: Cf. Hitopadeša, Introd. šl. 45.];
+
+58. By devotedly worshipping Brâhmans without ceasing, a Šûdra will
+never become a Brâhman; there may enter into him a little merit, but
+one of the Šûdra caste will never become a Brâhman.
+
+59. The venerable author of the Aphorisms himself established a
+duality when he spoke of the application of the terms "object" and
+"agent" [Footnote: In Vedânta S. i. 2. 4, it is shown that certain
+passages in the Upanishads refer to Brahman and not the embodied
+soul, "because of the application therein of the terms object
+and agent;" as __e.g.__ in the passage of the Chhândogya Upan. iii.
+14, "I shall attain it when I have departed from hence." These
+words imply an agent who attains and also an object which is
+attained, __i.e.__ Brahman. Ša"nkara in his comment on i. 2. 11
+illustrates this by the passage in the Katha Upanishad iii. 1, "The
+two, drinking the due reward from their works, in this world
+entered the cave, in the highest place of the supreme soul" (sc.
+the heart)]; and thus has it been explained by the author of the
+commentary by quoting passages of the Veda which imply duality, as
+that which says "the two entered the cave."
+
+60. The soul is also shown to be different [from Brahman] by the
+evidence of Šm.riti [Footnote: Cf. Vedânta Sûtras i. 2. 6, where
+Ša"nkara quotes the passage from the Bhagavad Gîtâ (xviii. 61),
+"The Lord of all beings abides in the region of the heart,--causing
+all beings to revolve by his illusion as though mounted on a
+machine."]; thus their difference is proved to be essential. If it
+were not so, how could the Commentator have used such an expression
+as "the worshipper" and "the worshipped" [Footnote: He uses this
+very expression __upâsyopâsakabhâva__ in his Comment. on i. 2. 4.]?
+
+61. I am sometimes happy, sometimes miserable; He, the supreme Soul,
+is always essentially happy. Such is the difference,--then how can
+there be identity between these two different substances?
+
+62. He is eternally self-luminous and unobscured,-- intensely pure,
+the one witness of the world; not so is the individual soul,--thus
+a thunderbolt falls on the tree of the theory of Identity.
+
+63. For those who maintain the identity of the individual and supreme
+soul, the hypothesis of a __dvandva compound__ [Footnote: __I.e.__ in
+the word __jîvâtmânau__] is precluded; or they bring forward such
+words as __d.rishadupala__ as parallel cases [Footnote: I suppose that
+this means that the __dvandva__ compound __d.rishadupala__ has some
+analogy to one like __jîvâtmânau__, which involves identity, as the
+upper and lower millstone form one instrument; but there (in
+accordance with Pâ.n. 2. 2. 34, __vârtt.__) the less important word
+meaning the upper and smaller stone (__upalâ__) is placed last
+(cf. 2. 2. 31)]; the __dvandva__ is only consistent with "difference,"
+but in no way with "identity."
+
+64. Where identity is the meaning, there arises the __karmadhâraya__
+compound,--for [such a __karmadhâraya__ as] __nîlotpala__ "the
+blue-lotus" is used as implying that the two members of the compound
+refer to the same subject [Footnote: But __jîvâtmânau__ is a
+__dvandva__, not a __karmadhâraya__ compound.]
+
+65. As there are many passages in Šruti such as that which says
+"food is Brahman," [Footnote: Brihad Âra.nyaka Upan. v. 12. 1.] so
+too this passage "I am Brahman" is to be understood as meaning
+worship [Footnote: __I.e.__ this is one of the modes of worshipping
+Brahman by meditating on him in some lower visible form, not as
+really expressing his real nature.]
+
+66. The doctrine of Identity is not true; wherever it appears to be
+declared in Šruti, all those passages are to be taken as only
+meaning worship.
+
+67. There are many sentences in the ancient Veda which speak for
+non-identity as also for identity; having expelled envy and discussed
+the truth, let the wise declare that which each thinks wholesome.
+
+68. O soul, bewildered by a deceived opinion, drive far from thy
+mouth these words "I am Brahman"; how canst thou be That, O thou who
+art utterly at the mercy of fate, plunged as thou art in the great
+ocean of mundane existence hard to be crossed!
+
+69. He who is the beloved of Lakshmi, the ambrosia-ocean, full of
+manifest supreme joy; the water of whose feet is Gangâ, worthy to be
+worshipped by Rudra and the other gods; who before creation created
+all instantaneously by a movement of his brow,--how canst thou say,
+O soul, "I am He,"--thou who art a poor beggar, not a king.
+
+70. O slow of mind, how canst thou say, I am He with whom are filled
+all the vast stores of this universe in its entirety? Collect thy
+faculties calmly in thy heart and consider thine own power; can a
+host of fierce world-supporting elephants enter into the belly of a
+gnat?
+
+71. Whose art thou? whence art thou come? how is the course of this
+mundane bondage? Ponder this matter in thy heart and forsake the
+path of the erring. Say not "I am He"; but worship Hari continually
+in the relation of adorer and adored; by this thou mayst attain the
+happy journey, but otherwise thou wilt assuredly fall.
+
+72. Great is the misery which thou hast experienced, O Soul, while
+dwelling in the womb in various births, and thou hast wandered again
+and again in heaven or in hell; this theory "I am He" is an error of
+thine,--worship thou Hari's lotus feet; thou art His worshipper, He
+is the adorable, for He is the lord of the three worlds.
+
+73. Renouncing the so-called theory of identity, forthwith devote
+thyself to duality, if there now dwells in thy heart a supreme
+feeling of faith in Hari; and, having learned the doctrine in
+Nârada's Pañcharâtra and everywhere else, let all the hymns of the
+Vaish.nava sacred books be thoroughly examined, as is truly for thy
+good.
+
+74. By what foolish teacher hast thou been instructed, that thou
+utterest these words "I am Brahman"? How art thou that being who is
+continually worshipped by Rudra and all the gods? O fool, consider
+it and see aright.
+
+75. The wicked cannot understand the difference between the embodied
+and the Supreme Souls; the great reason for this is a mind possessed
+by an evil obstinacy in favour of the doctrine of Illusion; just as
+the tongue of those who suffer from excess of bile cannot taste the
+sweetness of molasses, nor the eyes of those afflicted with gutta
+serena or jaundice see the whiteness of a shell.
+
+76. He by a particle of whose intellect thou, O Soul, hast been
+produced the foremost of intelligent beings--say not, O knave, that
+thou art __He__; for who but the ingrate desires to seize the seat
+of his Master?
+
+77. A particle of intelligence has been deposited in thee by the
+supreme Lord in His mercy,--it becomes thee not, O knave, to say
+that therefore thou art God; just as if some evil-minded man had
+received elephants, horses, and infantry from the king and then set
+his heart on seizing his kingdom.
+
+78. He under whose control is that mighty illusion which deceives
+the three worlds, He is to be recognized as the Supreme Lord, the
+adorable, essentially thought, existence and joy; but he who is
+himself always under her control like a camel drawn by a string
+through his nostrils, is to be recognized as the individual soul,--
+vast indeed is the difference between the two!
+
+79. Having studied the doctrines of the Sâ"nkhya, Ka.nâda, and
+Gautama, and the doctrine of Patañjali, the doctrines of the
+Mîmâ.msâ and Bha.t.tabhâskara [Footnote: Colebrooke's Essays,
+vol i. p. 359.], --amidst all the six current systems,--let the wise
+tell the final conclusion if they can as to the real nature of the
+supreme and the individual soul,--is it duality, or is it oneness,
+or is it again a oneness in duality?
+
+80. In five of the systems I have only heard peremptorily asserted
+in many places the difference between the supreme and the individual
+souls; what is this that I hear asserted in the Vedânta system?
+"Plurality, unity, both,"--this is a threefold marvel! [Footnote:
+This is an attack on Râmânuja's system, as opposed to that of
+Pûr.naprajña or Madhva, cf. Sarva-daršana S. p. 52, l. 20, "What is
+the real truth? The real truth is plurality, unity, and both. Thus
+unity is admitted in saying that Brahman alone subsists in all forms
+as all is its body; both unity and plurality are admitted in saying
+that one only Brahman subsists under a plurality of forms, diverse
+as soul and non-soul; and plurality is admitted in saying that the
+essential natures of soul, non-soul, and the Lord are different and
+not to be confounded." This doctrine is opposed by the followers of
+Madhva, see __ibid.__, Pûr.naprajña-darš. p. 61, l. 11.]
+
+81. He who is the maker of all and the Lord of the world is
+independent by reason of his essential independence; the individual
+soul is notoriously dependent; how can they say then that these two
+are identical?
+
+82. There are various flavours in honey [existing distinct] through
+the difference of the trees [from whose flowers it is produced];
+how else could it remove the three-fold disorders? [Footnote:
+__I.e.__ those affecting the three "humours" of the body, __i.e.
+vâyu__ 'wind,' __pitta__ 'bile,' and __kapha__ 'phlegm.' Certain
+flavours of the honey counteract one disorder and others another.
+The Sušruta thus describes honey (vol. i. p. 185): "When cooked it
+removes the three-fold disorders, but when raw or sour it causes
+them; when used in various applications it cures many disorders;
+and since it is composed of many different things it is an
+excellent medium for mixing. But as it consists of the juices of
+flowers which are mutually contrary in the action, potency, and
+qualities of their various ingredients, and it may happen that
+poisonous insects may be included, it is only good as a remedy for
+cold diseases."] So the individual souls at the world's
+dissolution are absorbed in the Lord; but they do not become
+identified with Him, for they are again separated at the next
+creation.
+
+83. There is a difference between rivers and the sea, with their
+respective sweet and salt water; so too God and the soul are
+different and possessed of distinct attributes [Footnote: In
+allusion to Mu.n.d. Upan. iii. 2. 8.].
+
+84. Rivers, when joined to the sea from all sides, are not
+identified with it nor yet do they appear to be separate; but from
+the difference between salt water and sweet water [Footnote: Most
+of the MSS. and the Benares Pa.n.dit read __kshî roda__; but the
+Calcutta ed. and one of the two MSS. in the Library of the Calcutta
+Sanskrit College read __kshâroda__, which seems preferable. If we
+read __kshîroda__, the line would require to be rendered, "but from
+the difference between milk mixed with water and pure water," or
+perhaps "from the difference between the milk-ocean and the water-
+ocean."] there must be a real difference between them.
+
+85. Others see not the difference when water is mixed with milk, but
+the swan at once separates the milk and the water [Footnote: Cf.
+Šakunt. šl. 155.]; so too when the souls are absorbed in the supreme
+Brahman, the Lord,--the faithful, who have received the Guru's words,
+can at once draw a difference between them.
+
+86. Even when milk is mixed with milk and water with water, they do
+not become absolutely identified, for they still retain their fixed
+measure as before; so, when the souls through intense contemplation
+are absorbed in the Supreme Spirit, they do not become identified
+with Him; thus say the pure-minded saints.
+
+87. There are certain disputants, sunk in a sea of false logic,
+addicted to an evil way, filled with a hundred imaginations of idle
+babble, deceived themselves and deceiving the world,--all that they
+say, "I am Brahman and all this visible universe also is Brahman,"--
+is now shown clearly to be an empty desire.
+
+88. If I and all this universe were Brahman, then there would be an
+identity between thee and me; then thy wealth, sons, and wife would
+be mine, and mine would be thine, for there would be no distinction
+between us.
+
+89. And how then could there be injunction or prohibition, since all
+are one, and there is no distinction of caste? If the doctrine of
+non-duality be thus held to be established, then what offence has
+the Buddhist committed?
+
+90. "The Soul is different from the elements, the senses, the
+internal organ, and primary matter, and also from that which is
+called the individual,"--thus has it been declared of old by Kapila
+to his mother in the third book of the Bhâgavata [Footnote: Bhâg.
+Pûr. iii. 28. 41.] (Purâ.na).
+
+91. Those who study the path pointed out by the teacher, resting
+upon a foundation of naught, and maintain with an empty
+understanding that all is void and that all the recognized deities
+are naught,--how can many words be uttered about them, for language
+fails in a topic of naught; naught indeed is their wisdom, and
+their fruit shall be also mostly naught.
+
+92. There are words uttered by Vyâsa in the Bhârata condemning this
+doctrine of the nothingness of all things [Footnote: The name
+__šûnyavâda__ is generally applied to Buddhism; here it is applied by
+way of reproach to the Vedânta, which is called in the Padma-purâ.na
+"secret Buddhism" (__prachchhanna.m Bauddham__)]; "their bodies are
+composed of the quality of darkness, and verily darkness shall be
+their end;" [Footnote: Mahâbh. xii. 9690.]
+
+93. These words which were uttered of old by Kapila in the presence
+of the sage Syûmarašmi [Footnote: This dialogue occurs in Mahâbh. xii.
+9604, ff.], were afterwards recounted by Vyâsa in the Bhâ.rata.
+
+94. This theory of theirs concerning a void of qualities in Him who
+is the ocean of qualities [Footnote: The Râmânujas and the Mâdhvas
+deny that the Supreme Being is __nirgu.na__,--thus there is a
+quotation in the Sarva Daršana S. p. 64. "Vâsudeva is the supreme
+Brahman, endowed with auspicious attributes" (cf. p. 69, l. 18;
+p. 73, l. 2)], --it is but like the blind hurrying of sheep after
+the ewe that leads them! Having made a separate commentary of their
+own on the Sûtras they deceive those who follow their doctrine.
+
+95. All these qualities, sovereignty, creation, and the like,
+eternally belong to the Supreme Lord; how then can He be "without
+qualities" who is thus "possessed of qualities"? he theory of a void
+of qualities is mere disputation.
+
+96. The adorable one possesses knowledge, volition, and creative
+power; how then can he be destitute of qualities? or, if he is
+destitute of qualities, how can he be set forth by the Vedas? How
+can the absence of qualities be predicated of the sea of qualities,
+and yet all remonstrance be silent? Ponder it well in thine own
+mind, and then determine what is right.
+
+97. A substance without attributes, like the sky-flower, is not
+admitted either in the Veda or in the world; if the knowledge of such
+a thing were derived from the Veda, the Veda itself would then cease
+to be an authority.
+
+98. [The Vedântin may reply] "The bunch of Darbha grass [Footnote:
+This is the __prastara__ or bundle of sacred grass, which plays an
+important part in the sacrificial ritual, cf. Taittirîya S. i. 7. 4,
+"__yajamâna.h prastara.h,__" where Sâya.na remarks, "__yajamânavad
+yâgasâdhanatvât prastare yajamânatvopachâra.h.__" This description
+of the grass as the sacrificer is really only meant as metaphorical
+praise, since the actual attributes of the sacrificer are evidently
+absent from the grass. (Cf. Mîmâ.msâ Sûtras, i. 4. 23.)] is said to
+be the sacrificer, as it is the means of performing the sacrifice;
+[as the Darbha grass is understood by this description,] even though
+the attributes thus ascribed are not found in it, so is Brahman
+understood when we ascribe certain qualities [as 'truth,' etc., even
+though these qualities are precluded in a being without qualities]."
+
+99. [I answer] A thorough Vedântin like thee does not accept any
+where the existence of qualities or that which possesses qualities;
+but if imagined qualities are done away with [by deeper insight],
+real qualities are nowhere done away with [Footnote: Clearer insight
+abolishes imagined attributes, as __e. g.__ the supposed snake in
+the rope; but real attributes remain untouched, and we hold
+Brahman's attributes to be real.--I read __abâdha.h__ in I. 2.].
+
+100. If Brahman is understood to be destitute of qualities, then
+"truth," etc., will not be applicable to Him; but, if so, there
+arises a contradiction in such passages [of Šruti] as "he is the
+truthful," etc. [Footnote: I do not know where this passage occurs,
+but the kindred word __satyadharman__ is applied to several deities
+in the Rigveda.]
+
+101. When the existence of such a thing as a quality is admitted,
+we can imagine it in something else [Footnote: The Vedântins hold
+that nothing exists besides Brahman; and yet, although they thus
+deny the existence of any other thing or quality, they hold that
+certain qualities are imagined to exist in him, forgetting that
+only one who has seen silver can imagine __rajatatva__ in nacre.];
+but to imagine that nacre is silver, we must first know clearly
+what silver is.
+
+102. This universe is based on the soul as its site, being imagined
+in it by ignorance; some teachers would describe it as an illusory
+emanation [Footnote: It is a favourite doctrine of the Vedânta that
+ignorance, as being imagined by ignorance, is itself false.]; but
+this is not a pleasing doctrine to me.
+
+103. It cannot be said that all this universe is false; since it is
+really the plaything of Hari, who is eternally engaged in sport
+[Footnote: Manu, i. 80, "There are numberless Manvantaras,
+creations and destructions numberless; the being supremely exalted
+performs all this, as in sport, again and again."]
+
+104. The external world is not like a dream; for in dreams there is
+sleep and a host of imperfections; what we eat or drink in dreams
+gives us no enjoyment, but these things are enjoyable in our waking
+state.
+
+105. If all that is seen were false, then how could it produce
+effects? The carrying of water in a jar is not false; all we can
+say is that it is transient.
+
+106. The idea that all this world is false, is opposed to
+experience; for of what use would be all the expiations for sin,
+prescribed in the law-books? Why are these thieves to be punished
+even by the king? The upholder of the doctrine of Mâyâ can assert
+anything on his oath, but all is false.
+
+107. Thou canst not say that the visible world is only like the
+transitory enjoyment of one who smells a wreath of flowers; however
+closely it is scanned, there is no overpowering evidence of its
+unreality [to preclude the presumption founded on experience]; it
+continually manifests itself to us as eternal in its stream of
+successive events.
+
+108. This world is not false but it is rendered true by Vish.nu's
+protection [Footnote: Or this may mean "since Vish.nu has accepted
+it as the instrument of his sport."]; thou art made pure by the
+knowledge of Him, as all minerals shine as gold [when brought in
+contact with the philosopher's stone].
+
+109. Dispassion and enjoyment stand equally aloof as disinterested
+spectators and are lost in faith; the partaking of the consecrated
+food is in no sense to be called an "enjoyment,"--it is itself an
+act of faith [Footnote: "The __prasâda__ is any article of food
+that has been consecrated by previous presentation to an idol,
+after which it is distributed among the worshippers on the spot, or
+sent to persons of consequence at their own houses" (Wilson's Works,
+vol. 1. p. 116). Cf. also the legend in p. 134, where "Râm Dâs at
+noon halted and bathed the god, and prepared his food, and presented
+it, and then took the __prasâd__, and put it in a vessel, and fed
+upon what remained." (The food consecrated at the temple of Puri is
+especially called the __Mahâprasâda.__) There is a distich current
+among the Bhâktas:].
+
+110. By intense devotion to his object the man of the world will
+become the devotee of enjoyment, and by the absence of all enjoyment
+a man becomes absolutely dispassionate; this is the real truth
+[Footnote: But the true devotee is neither devoted to enjoyment nor
+to dispassion, is equally apart from and superior to both.
+
+/*
+ __jñâna.m nirâk.ritir, Brahma tyaktvâ bhaktyâ bhajâchyutam__ |
+ __yatra prasâdasevâpi bhaktir anyasya kâ kathâ__ ||
+*/
+
+"Knowledge is rejection; abandon Brahman and worship Vish.nu. Here
+where even the homage paid to the __prasâda__ counts as faith, what
+need to mention anything besides?" Thus the devotee does everything
+by faith, and dispassion and enjoyment are to him alike swallowed up
+in faith].
+
+111. By association with the good and by repeatedly listening to the
+story of K.rish.na's sports there has arisen in the lake of the mind
+the great wave of pure faith and pure affection; abandoning the
+doctrine of unity and without hesitation embracing that of duality,
+we worship with our whole heart the lotus-feet of the beloved of
+Lakshmî.
+
+112. There is a rule in the things of the world, that he who is near
+the king may be called the king; so too in the things of Brahman and
+the soul must we understand the various sacred texts [which at first
+sight appear to identify them].
+
+113. He in whom the universe,--sun, moon, and the rest, with the three
+worlds,--rose into being,--in whom it all abides until it perishes,--
+and in whom, each in its own time, it is all finally dissolved,--He,
+the Lord, whom, being beyond all qualities [Footnote: Cf. Sarva D. S.
+p. 52, l. 8 infr. "The statements that the Supreme Spirit is devoid
+of qualities, are intended to deny his possession of phenomenal
+qualities (such as liking, disliking, etc.)."], even Brahman himself
+cannot declare in the Vedas,--why, O teacher, dost thou teach this
+miserable me the words "I am He"?
+
+114. He in whom the storehouse of the universe with all its creatures
+great and small, was all contained like a line of insects drowned in
+a ripe fruit of the glomerous fig-tree,--in whom it abides until the
+final destruction,--and in whom it is eventually dissolved,--Ah! how
+can there come from my mouth, O teacher, these words "I am He"?
+
+115. Him, the Supreme Lord, by whose compassion even the dumb becomes
+eloquent, the lame in a moment obtains strength to leap mountains,
+and even the man blind from his birth receives eyes beautiful like
+two lotuses,--or what still greater marvel shall I add?--Him I
+worship, the moon-faced son of Nanda, the philosopher's stone of the
+faithful.
+
+116. Boundless is time, bounteous the earth, and great is the family
+of the devout worshippers of Vish.nu; somebody will be found at some
+time or other on the earth who will appreciate my merits [Footnote:
+Cf. the šloka in the prologue of the Mâlatîmâdhava.]
+
+117. Having studied under my preceptor Nârâya.na, the best of
+teachers, his book, which bears the title of "The Ornament of
+Faith,"--having read it with all its supplements and appendices, and
+by his kindness to his faithful disciples having mastered all its
+mysteries,--and having become a receptacle of faith myself, I have
+now composed according to my ability this century of stanzas, a
+necklace of pearls of good doctrine, which have for their subject
+the distinction of the individual Soul and Brahman.
+
+118. If we have uttered through inadvertence what is wrong, may the
+intelligent, observing it, correct all the errors; the feet of the
+traveller do sometimes stumble, and sometimes the speaker speaks
+through bewilderment what is incompatible.
+
+119. In a poem strung of all excellences the mean man hunts for
+faults and never an excellence; in a palace all compact of jewels
+it is the ant that will see a flaw.
+
+120. Let those who are envious and bereft of sense, detect a fault
+if they will; but let the connoisseurs count the merits; they who
+behold the merits and not the faults,--these are the good, these
+give the highest satisfaction.
+
+121. Let this work of the poet Pûr.nânanda be read and be heard,
+which is devoted to proving the difference of the individual soul
+from the Supreme,--which is excellent with its sentences that
+distinguish truth from falsehood, and is approved by the devotees
+of Vish.nu,--based on the doctrine of Madhva, and pleasing with a
+composition full of sweet words,--O ye best of the worshippers of
+Bhagavat, if faith be desired in your minds.
+
+122. On the neck of the faithful may this Tattvamuktâvalî
+[Footnote: Or "the necklace of the pearls of truth."] abide for
+ever,--whose beauty is increased by the apt arrangement of sweet
+and soft words but which is free from rhetorical ornaments,--
+beautiful with a profusion of sentences sweet like milk, and with
+its parts all bright and elegant,--a special source of delight to
+the intelligent,--charming with a host of excellences and devoid
+of even the trace of a fault.
+
+
+
+
+Tattva-muktavâlî by Pûr.nânanda Chakravartin
+
+
+
+End of Project Gutenberg's The Tattva-Muktavali, by Purnananda Chakravartin
+
+*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE TATTVA-MUKTAVALI ***
+
+This file should be named 7175-0.txt or 7175-0.zip
+Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks get a new NUMBER, 8ttva11u.txt
+VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, 8ttva10ua.txt
+
+Originally scanned at sacred-texts.com by John B. Hare.
+This eBook was produced by Chetan K. Jain
+
+Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we usually do not
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+We are now trying to release all our eBooks one year in advance
+of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing.
+Please be encouraged to tell us about any error or corrections,
+even years after the official publication date.
+
+Please note neither this listing nor its contents are final til
+midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
+The official release date of all Project Gutenberg eBooks is at
+Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A
+preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
+and editing by those who wish to do so.
+
+Most people start at our Web sites at:
+https://gutenberg.org or
+http://promo.net/pg
+
+These Web sites include award-winning information about Project
+Gutenberg, including how to donate, how to help produce our new
+eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter (free!).
+
+
+Those of you who want to download any eBook before announcement
+can get to them as follows, and just download by date. This is
+also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the
+indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an
+announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter.
+
+http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext03 or
+ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext03
+
+Or /etext02, 01, 00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90
+
+Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want,
+as it appears in our Newsletters.
+
+
+Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)
+
+We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The
+time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours
+to get any eBook selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
+searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. Our
+projected audience is one hundred million readers. If the value
+per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
+million dollars per hour in 2002 as we release over 100 new text
+files per month: 1240 more eBooks in 2001 for a total of 4000+
+We are already on our way to trying for 2000 more eBooks in 2002
+If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total
+will reach over half a trillion eBooks given away by year's end.
+
+The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away 1 Trillion eBooks!
+This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
+which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users.
+
+Here is the briefest record of our progress (* means estimated):
+
+eBooks Year Month
+
+ 1 1971 July
+ 10 1991 January
+ 100 1994 January
+ 1000 1997 August
+ 1500 1998 October
+ 2000 1999 December
+ 2500 2000 December
+ 3000 2001 November
+ 4000 2001 October/November
+ 6000 2002 December*
+ 9000 2003 November*
+10000 2004 January*
+
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been created
+to secure a future for Project Gutenberg into the next millennium.
+
+We need your donations more than ever!
+
+As of February, 2002, contributions are being solicited from people
+and organizations in: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut,
+Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois,
+Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts,
+Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New
+Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
+Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South
+Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West
+Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
+
+We have filed in all 50 states now, but these are the only ones
+that have responded.
+
+As the requirements for other states are met, additions to this list
+will be made and fund raising will begin in the additional states.
+Please feel free to ask to check the status of your state.
+
+In answer to various questions we have received on this:
+
+We are constantly working on finishing the paperwork to legally
+request donations in all 50 states. If your state is not listed and
+you would like to know if we have added it since the list you have,
+just ask.
+
+While we cannot solicit donations from people in states where we are
+not yet registered, we know of no prohibition against accepting
+donations from donors in these states who approach us with an offer to
+donate.
+
+International donations are accepted, but we don't know ANYTHING about
+how to make them tax-deductible, or even if they CAN be made
+deductible, and don't have the staff to handle it even if there are
+ways.
+
+Donations by check or money order may be sent to:
+
+Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+PMB 113
+1739 University Ave.
+Oxford, MS 38655-4109
+
+Contact us if you want to arrange for a wire transfer or payment
+method other than by check or money order.
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been approved by
+the US Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) organization with EIN
+[Employee Identification Number] 64-622154. Donations are
+tax-deductible to the maximum extent permitted by law. As fund-raising
+requirements for other states are met, additions to this list will be
+made and fund-raising will begin in the additional states.
+
+We need your donations more than ever!
+
+You can get up to date donation information online at:
+
+https://www.gutenberg.org/donation.html
+
+
+***
+
+If you can't reach Project Gutenberg,
+you can always email directly to:
+
+Michael S. Hart <hart@pobox.com>
+
+Prof. Hart will answer or forward your message.
+
+We would prefer to send you information by email.
+
+
+**The Legal Small Print**
+
+
+(Three Pages)
+
+***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS**START***
+Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
+They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
+your copy of this eBook, even if you got it for free from
+someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
+fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement
+disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how
+you may distribute copies of this eBook if you want to.
+
+*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS EBOOK
+By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
+eBook, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept
+this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive
+a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this eBook by
+sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person
+you got it from. If you received this eBook on a physical
+medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request.
+
+ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM EBOOKS
+This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBooks,
+is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart
+through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project").
+Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright
+on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and
+distribute it in the United States without permission and
+without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth
+below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this eBook
+under the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark.
+
+Please do not use the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark to market
+any commercial products without permission.
+
+To create these eBooks, the Project expends considerable
+efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain
+works. Despite these efforts, the Project's eBooks and any
+medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other
+things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
+intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged
+disk or other eBook medium, a computer virus, or computer
+codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
+
+LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES
+But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below,
+[1] Michael Hart and the Foundation (and any other party you may
+receive this eBook from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook) disclaims
+all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including
+legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR
+UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT,
+INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
+OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE
+POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
+
+If you discover a Defect in this eBook within 90 days of
+receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any)
+you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that
+time to the person you received it from. If you received it
+on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and
+such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement
+copy. If you received it electronically, such person may
+choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to
+receive it electronically.
+
+THIS EBOOK IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS
+TO THE EBOOK OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
+PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or
+the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the
+above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you
+may have other legal rights.
+
+INDEMNITY
+You will indemnify and hold Michael Hart, the Foundation,
+and its trustees and agents, and any volunteers associated
+with the production and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
+texts harmless, from all liability, cost and expense, including
+legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the
+following that you do or cause: [1] distribution of this eBook,
+[2] alteration, modification, or addition to the eBook,
+or [3] any Defect.
+
+DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm"
+You may distribute copies of this eBook electronically, or by
+disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this
+"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg,
+or:
+
+[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this
+ requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the
+ eBook or this "small print!" statement. You may however,
+ if you wish, distribute this eBook in machine readable
+ binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form,
+ including any form resulting from conversion by word
+ processing or hypertext software, but only so long as
+ *EITHER*:
+
+ [*] The eBook, when displayed, is clearly readable, and
+ does *not* contain characters other than those
+ intended by the author of the work, although tilde
+ (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may
+ be used to convey punctuation intended by the
+ author, and additional characters may be used to
+ indicate hypertext links; OR
+
+ [*] The eBook may be readily converted by the reader at
+ no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent
+ form by the program that displays the eBook (as is
+ the case, for instance, with most word processors);
+ OR
+
+ [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at
+ no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the
+ eBook in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC
+ or other equivalent proprietary form).
+
+[2] Honor the eBook refund and replacement provisions of this
+ "Small Print!" statement.
+
+[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Foundation of 20% of the
+ gross profits you derive calculated using the method you
+ already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you
+ don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are
+ payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation"
+ the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were
+ legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent
+ periodic) tax return. Please contact us beforehand to
+ let us know your plans and to work out the details.
+
+WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO?
+Project Gutenberg is dedicated to increasing the number of
+public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed
+in machine readable form.
+
+The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time,
+public domain materials, or royalty free copyright licenses.
+Money should be paid to the:
+"Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or
+software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at:
+hart@pobox.com
+
+[Portions of this eBook's header and trailer may be reprinted only
+when distributed free of all fees. Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 by
+Michael S. Hart. Project Gutenberg is a TradeMark and may not be
+used in any sales of Project Gutenberg eBooks or other materials be
+they hardware or software or any other related product without
+express permission.]
+
+*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS*Ver.02/11/02*END*
+
diff --git a/7175-0.zip b/7175-0.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd10d48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/7175-0.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e03bc6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #7175 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7175)