summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/29259.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 02:47:10 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 02:47:10 -0700
commit3aba186ac50aa45b49e2c28777f984e92564ad27 (patch)
tree0eb722d72d963c929477fcbd947c51be85576694 /29259.txt
initial commit of ebook 29259HEADmain
Diffstat (limited to '29259.txt')
-rw-r--r--29259.txt1126
1 files changed, 1126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/29259.txt b/29259.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8bf3814
--- /dev/null
+++ b/29259.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1126 @@
+The Project Gutenberg eBook, The Child and the Curriculum, by John Dewey
+
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+
+
+
+Title: The Child and the Curriculum
+
+
+Author: John Dewey
+
+
+
+Release Date: June 28, 2009 [eBook #29259]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-646-US (US-ASCII)
+
+
+***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE CHILD AND THE CURRICULUM***
+
+
+E-text prepared by Jonathan Ingram, Andrew D. Hwang, and the Project
+Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from
+digital material generously made available by Internet Archive/Canadian
+Libraries (http://www.archive.org/details/toronto)
+
+
+
+Note: Images of the original pages are available through
+ Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries. See
+ http://www.archive.org/details/childandcurricul00deweuoft
+
+
+
+
+
+THE CHILD AND THE CURRICULUM
+
+by
+
+JOHN DEWEY
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+[Illustration: Publisher's Device]
+
+The University of Chicago Press
+Chicago & London
+
+The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London
+
+The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada
+
+Copyright 1902 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
+Published 1902. Twenty-eighth Impression 1966 Printed in the United
+States of America
+
+
+
+
+_The Child and the Curriculum_
+
+
+Profound differences in theory are never gratuitous or invented. They
+grow out of conflicting elements in a genuine problem--a problem
+which is genuine just because the elements, taken as they stand, are
+conflicting. Any significant problem involves conditions that for the
+moment contradict each other. Solution comes only by getting away from
+the meaning of terms that is already fixed upon and coming to see the
+conditions from another point of view, and hence in a fresh light. But
+this reconstruction means travail of thought. Easier than thinking with
+surrender of already formed ideas and detachment from facts already
+learned is just to stick by what is already said, looking about for
+something with which to buttress it against attack.
+
+Thus sects arise: schools of opinion. Each selects that set of
+conditions that appeals to it; and then erects them into a complete and
+independent truth, instead of treating them as a factor in a problem,
+needing adjustment.
+
+The fundamental factors in the educative process are an immature,
+undeveloped being; and certain social aims, meanings, values incarnate
+in the matured experience of the adult. The educative process is the due
+interaction of these forces. Such a conception of each in relation to
+the other as facilitates completest and freest interaction is the
+essence of educational theory.
+
+But here comes the effort of thought. It is easier to see the conditions
+in their separateness, to insist upon one at the expense of the other,
+to make antagonists of them, than to discover a reality to which each
+belongs. The easy thing is to seize upon something in the nature of the
+child, or upon something in the developed consciousness of the adult,
+and insist upon _that_ as the key to the whole problem. When this
+happens a really serious practical problem--that of interaction--is
+transformed into an unreal, and hence insoluble, theoretic problem.
+Instead of seeing the educative steadily and as a whole, we see
+conflicting terms. We get the case of the child _vs._ the curriculum; of
+the individual nature _vs._ social culture. Below all other divisions in
+pedagogic opinion lies this opposition.
+
+The child lives in a somewhat narrow world of personal contacts. Things
+hardly come within his experience unless they touch, intimately and
+obviously, his own well-being, or that of his family and friends. His
+world is a world of persons with their personal interests, rather than
+a realm of facts and laws. Not truth, in the sense of conformity to
+external fact, but affection and sympathy, is its keynote. As against
+this, the course of study met in the school presents material stretching
+back indefinitely in time, and extending outward indefinitely into
+space. The child is taken out of his familiar physical environment,
+hardly more than a square mile or so in area, into the wide world--yes,
+and even to the bounds of the solar system. His little span of personal
+memory and tradition is overlaid with the long centuries of the history
+of all peoples.
+
+Again, the child's life is an integral, a total one. He passes quickly
+and readily from one topic to another, as from one spot to another,
+but is not conscious of transition or break. There is no conscious
+isolation, hardly conscious distinction. The things that occupy him are
+held together by the unity of the personal and social interests which
+his life carries along. Whatever is uppermost in his mind constitutes
+to him, for the time being, the whole universe. That universe is fluid
+and fluent; its contents dissolve and re-form with amazing rapidity.
+But, after all, it is the child's own world. It has the unity and
+completeness of his own life. He goes to school, and various studies
+divide and fractionize the world for him. Geography selects, it
+abstracts and analyzes one set of facts, and from one particular point
+of view. Arithmetic is another division, grammar another department, and
+so on indefinitely.
+
+Again, in school each of these subjects is classified. Facts are torn
+away from their original place in experience and rearranged with
+reference to some general principle. Classification is not a matter
+of child experience; things do not come to the individual pigeonholed.
+The vital ties of affection, the connecting bonds of activity, hold
+together the variety of his personal experiences. The adult mind is so
+familiar with the notion of logically ordered facts that it does not
+recognize--it cannot realize--the amount of separating and reformulating
+which the facts of direct experience have to undergo before they can
+appear as a "study," or branch of learning. A principle, for the
+intellect, has had to be distinguished and defined; facts have had
+to be interpreted in relation to this principle, not as they are in
+themselves. They have had to be regathered about a new center which is
+wholly abstract and ideal. All this means a development of a special
+intellectual interest. It means ability to view facts impartially and
+objectively; that is, without reference to their place and meaning in
+one's own experience. It means capacity to analyze and to synthesize. It
+means highly matured intellectual habits and the command of a definite
+technique and apparatus of scientific inquiry. The studies as classified
+are the product, in a word, of the science of the ages, not of the
+experience of the child.
+
+These apparent deviations and differences between child and curriculum
+might be almost indefinitely widened. But we have here sufficiently
+fundamental divergences: first, the narrow but personal world of the
+child against the impersonal but infinitely extended world of space and
+time; second, the unity, the single wholeheartedness of the child's
+life, and the specializations and divisions of the curriculum; third, an
+abstract principle of logical classification and arrangement, and the
+practical and emotional bonds of child life.
+
+From these elements of conflict grow up different educational sects.
+One school fixes its attention upon the importance of the subject-matter
+of the curriculum as compared with the contents of the child's own
+experience. It is as if they said: Is life petty, narrow, and crude?
+Then studies reveal the great, wide universe with all its fulness and
+complexity of meaning. Is the life of the child egoistic, self-centered,
+impulsive? Then in these studies is found an objective universe of
+truth, law, and order. Is his experience confused, vague, uncertain,
+at the mercy of the moment's caprice and circumstance? Then studies
+introduce a world arranged on the basis of eternal and general truth; a
+world where all is measured and defined. Hence the moral: ignore and
+minimize the child's individual peculiarities, whims, and experiences.
+They are what we need to get away from. They are to be obscured or
+eliminated. As educators our work is precisely to substitute for these
+superficial and casual affairs stable and well-ordered realities; and
+these are found in studies and lessons.
+
+Subdivide each topic into studies; each study into lessons; each lesson
+into specific facts and formulae. Let the child proceed step by step to
+master each one of these separate parts, and at last he will have
+covered the entire ground. The road which looks so long when viewed in
+its entirety is easily traveled, considered as a series of particular
+steps. Thus emphasis is put upon the logical subdivisions and
+consecutions of the subject-matter. Problems of instruction are problems
+of procuring texts giving logical parts and sequences, and of presenting
+these portions in class in a similar definite and graded way.
+Subject-matter furnishes the end, and it determines method. The child is
+simply the immature being who is to be matured; he is the superficial
+being who is to be deepened; his is narrow experience which is to be
+widened. It is his to receive, to accept. His part is fulfilled when he
+is ductile and docile.
+
+Not so, says the other sect. The child is the starting-point, the
+center, and the end. His development, his growth, is the ideal. It
+alone furnishes the standard. To the growth of the child all studies
+are subservient; they are instruments valued as they serve the needs
+of growth. Personality, character, is more than subject-matter. Not
+knowledge or information, but self-realization, is the goal. To possess
+all the world of knowledge and lose one's own self is as awful a fate in
+education as in religion. Moreover, subject-matter never can be got into
+the child from without. Learning is active. It involves reaching out
+of the mind. It involves organic assimilation starting from within.
+Literally, we must take our stand with the child and our departure from
+him. It is he and not the subject-matter which determines both quality
+and quantity of learning.
+
+The only significant method is the method of the mind as it reaches
+out and assimilates. Subject-matter is but spiritual food, possible
+nutritive material. It cannot digest itself; it cannot of its own
+accord turn into bone and muscle and blood. The source of whatever
+is dead, mechanical, and formal in schools is found precisely in the
+subordination of the life and experience of the child to the curriculum.
+It is because of this that "study" has become a synonym for what is
+irksome, and a lesson identical with a task.
+
+This fundamental opposition of child and curriculum set up by these
+two modes of doctrine can be duplicated in a series of other terms.
+"Discipline" is the watchword of those who magnify the course of study;
+"interest" that of those who blazon "The Child" upon their banner. The
+standpoint of the former is logical; that of the latter psychological.
+The first emphasizes the necessity of adequate training and scholarship
+on the part of the teacher; the latter that of need of sympathy with the
+child, and knowledge of his natural instincts. "Guidance and control"
+are the catchwords of one school; "freedom and initiative" of the other.
+Law is asserted here; spontaneity proclaimed there. The old, the
+conservation of what has been achieved in the pain and toil of the ages,
+is dear to the one; the new, change, progress, wins the affection of the
+other. Inertness and routine, chaos and anarchism, are accusations
+bandied back and forth. Neglect of the sacred authority of duty is
+charged by one side, only to be met by counter-charges of suppression
+of individuality through tyrannical despotism.
+
+Such oppositions are rarely carried to their logical conclusion.
+Common-sense recoils at the extreme character of these results. They
+are left to theorists, while common-sense vibrates back and forward
+in a maze of inconsistent compromise. The need of getting theory and
+practical common-sense into closer connection suggests a return to our
+original thesis: that we have here conditions which are necessarily
+related to each other in the educative process, since this is precisely
+one of interaction and adjustment.
+
+What, then, is the problem? It is just to get rid of the prejudicial
+notion that there is some gap in kind (as distinct from degree) between
+the child's experience and the various forms of subject-matter that make
+up the course of study. From the side of the child, it is a question of
+seeing how his experience already contains within itself elements--facts
+and truths--of just the same sort as those entering into the formulated
+study; and, what is of more importance, of how it contains within itself
+the attitudes, the motives, and the interests which have operated in
+developing and organizing the subject-matter to the plane which it now
+occupies. From the side of the studies, it is a question of interpreting
+them as outgrowths of forces operating in the child's life, and of
+discovering the steps that intervene between the child's present
+experience and their richer maturity.
+
+Abandon the notion of subject-matter as something fixed and ready-made
+in itself, outside the child's experience; cease thinking of the child's
+experience as also something hard and fast; see it as something fluent,
+embryonic, vital; and we realize that the child and the curriculum are
+simply two limits which define a single process. Just as two points
+define a straight line, so the present standpoint of the child and the
+facts and truths of studies define instruction. It is continuous
+reconstruction, moving from the child's present experience out into that
+represented by the organized bodies of truth that we call studies.
+
+On the face of it, the various studies, arithmetic, geography, language,
+botany, etc., are themselves experience--they are that of the race. They
+embody the cumulative outcome of the efforts, the strivings, and the
+successes of the human race generation after generation. They present
+this, not as a mere accumulation, not as a miscellaneous heap of
+separate bits of experience, but in some organized and systematized
+way--that is, as reflectively formulated.
+
+Hence, the facts and truths that enter into the child's present
+experience, and those contained in the subject-matter of studies, are
+the initial and final terms of one reality. To oppose one to the other
+is to oppose the infancy and maturity of the same growing life; it is to
+set the moving tendency and the final result of the same process over
+against each other; it is to hold that the nature and the destiny of the
+child war with each other.
+
+If such be the case, the problem of the relation of the child and the
+curriculum presents itself in this guise: Of what use, educationally
+speaking, is it to be able to see the end in the beginning? How does
+it assist us in dealing with the early stages of growth to be able to
+anticipate its later phases? The studies, as we have agreed, represent
+the possibilities of development inherent in the child's immediate crude
+experience. But, after all, they are not parts of that present and
+immediate life. Why, then, or how, make account of them?
+
+Asking such a question suggests its own answer. To see the outcome is
+to know in what direction the present experience is moving, provided
+it move normally and soundly. The far-away point, which is of no
+significance to us simply as far away, becomes of huge importance the
+moment we take it as defining a present direction of movement. Taken
+in this way it is no remote and distant result to be achieved, but a
+guiding method in dealing with the present. The systematized and defined
+experience of the adult mind, in other words, is of value to us in
+interpreting the child's life as it immediately shows itself, and in
+passing on to guidance or direction.
+
+Let us look for a moment at these two ideas: interpretation and
+guidance. The child's present experience is in no way self-explanatory.
+It is not final, but transitional. It is nothing complete in itself, but
+just a sign or index of certain growth-tendencies. As long as we confine
+our gaze to what the child here and now puts forth, we are confused and
+misled. We cannot read its meaning. Extreme depreciations of the child
+morally and intellectually, and sentimental idealizations of him, have
+their root in a common fallacy. Both spring from taking stages of a
+growth or movement as something cut off and fixed. The first fails
+to see the promise contained in feelings and deeds which, taken by
+themselves, are uncompromising and repellent; the second fails to see
+that even the most pleasing and beautiful exhibitions are but signs,
+and that they begin to spoil and rot the moment they are treated as
+achievements.
+
+What we need is something which will enable us to interpret, to
+appraise, the elements in the child's present puttings forth and
+fallings away, his exhibitions of power and weakness, in the light of
+some larger growth-process in which they have their place. Only in this
+way can we discriminate. If we isolate the child's present inclinations,
+purposes, and experiences from the place they occupy and the part they
+have to perform in a developing experience, all stand upon the same
+level; all alike are equally good and equally bad. But in the movement
+of life different elements stand upon different planes of value. Some of
+the child's deeds are symptoms of a waning tendency; they are survivals
+in functioning of an organ which has done its part and is passing out of
+vital use. To give positive attention to such qualities is to arrest
+development upon a lower level. It is systematically to maintain a
+rudimentary phase of growth. Other activities are signs of a culminating
+power and interest; to them applies the maxim of striking while the
+iron is hot. As regards them, it is perhaps a matter of now or never.
+Selected, utilized, emphasized, they may mark a turning-point for good
+in the child's whole career; neglected, an opportunity goes, never to
+be recalled. Other acts and feelings are prophetic; they represent the
+dawning of flickering light that will shine steadily only in the far
+future. As regards them there is little at present to do but give them
+fair and full chance, waiting for the future for definite direction.
+
+Just as, upon the whole, it was the weakness of the "old education" that
+it made invidious comparisons between the immaturity of the child and
+the maturity of the adult, regarding the former as something to be got
+away from as soon as possible and as much as possible; so it is the
+danger of the "new education" that it regard the child's present powers
+and interests as something finally significant in themselves. In truth,
+his learnings and achievements are fluid and moving. They change from
+day to day and from hour to hour.
+
+It will do harm if child-study leave in the popular mind the impression
+that a child of a given age has a positive equipment of purposes and
+interests to be cultivated just as they stand. Interests in reality are
+but attitudes toward possible experiences; they are not achievements;
+their worth is in the leverage they afford, not in the accomplishment
+they represent. To take the phenomena presented at a given age as
+in any way self-explanatory or self-contained is inevitably to result
+in indulgence and spoiling. Any power, whether of child or adult,
+is indulged when it is taken on its given and present level in
+consciousness. Its genuine meaning is in the propulsion it affords
+toward a higher level. It is just something to do with. Appealing to the
+interest upon the present plane means excitation; it means playing with
+a power so as continually to stir it up without directing it toward
+definite achievement. Continuous initiation, continuous starting of
+activities that do not arrive, is, for all practical purposes, as bad
+as the continual repression of initiative in conformity with supposed
+interests of some more perfect thought or will. It is as if the child
+were forever tasting and never eating; always having his palate tickled
+upon the emotional side, but never getting the organic satisfaction that
+comes only with digestion of food and transformation of it into working
+power.
+
+As against such a view, the subject-matter of science and history and
+art serves to reveal the real child to us. We do not know the meaning
+either of his tendencies or of his performances excepting as we take
+them as germinating seed, or opening bud, of some fruit to be borne. The
+whole world of visual nature is all too small an answer to the problem
+of the meaning of the child's instinct for light and form. The entire
+science of physics is none too much to interpret adequately to us what
+is involved in some simple demand of the child for explanation of some
+casual change that has attracted his attention. The art of Raphael or of
+Corot is none too much to enable us to value the impulses stirring in
+the child when he draws and daubs.
+
+So much for the use of the subject-matter in interpretation. Its further
+employment in direction or guidance is but an expansion of the same
+thought. To interpret the fact is to see it in its vital movement, to
+see it in its relation to growth. But to view it as a part of a normal
+growth is to secure the basis for guiding it. Guidance is not external
+imposition. _It is freeing the life-process for its own most adequate
+fulfilment._ What was said about disregard of the child's present
+experience because of its remoteness from mature experience; and of the
+sentimental idealization of the child's naive caprices and performances,
+may be repeated here with slightly altered phrase. There are those who
+see no alternative between forcing the child from without, or leaving
+him entirely alone. Seeing no alternative, some choose one mode, some
+another. Both fall into the same fundamental error. Both fail to see
+that development is a definite process, having its own law which can be
+fulfilled only when adequate and normal conditions are provided. Really
+to interpret the child's present crude impulses in counting, measuring,
+and arranging things in rhythmic series involves mathematical
+scholarship--a knowledge of the mathematical formulae and relations
+which have, in the history of the race, grown out of just such crude
+beginnings. To see the whole history of development which intervenes
+between these two terms is simply to see what step the child needs to
+take just here and now; to what use he needs to put his blind impulse in
+order that it may get clarity and gain force.
+
+If, once more, the "old education" tended to ignore the dynamic quality,
+the developing force inherent in the child's present experience, and
+therefore to assume that direction and control were just matters of
+arbitrarily putting the child in a given path and compelling him to
+walk there, the "new education" is in danger of taking the idea of
+development in altogether too formal and empty a way. The child is
+expected to "develop" this or that fact or truth out of his own mind. He
+is told to think things out, or work things out for himself, without
+being supplied any of the environing conditions which are requisite to
+start and guide thought. Nothing can be developed from nothing; nothing
+but the crude can be developed out of the crude--and this is what surely
+happens when we throw the child back upon his achieved self as a
+finality, and invite him to spin new truths of nature or of conduct
+out of that. It is certainly as futile to expect a child to evolve a
+universe out of his own mere mind as it is for a philosopher to attempt
+that task. Development does not mean just getting something out of the
+mind. It is a development of experience and into experience that is
+really wanted. And this is impossible save as just that educative medium
+is provided which will enable the powers and interests that have been
+selected as valuable to function. They must operate, and how they
+operate will depend almost entirely upon the stimuli which surround
+them and the material upon which they exercise themselves. The problem
+of direction is thus the problem of selecting appropriate stimuli for
+instincts and impulses which it is desired to employ in the gaining
+of new experience. What new experiences are desirable, and thus what
+stimuli are needed, it is impossible to tell except as there is some
+comprehension of the development which is aimed at; except, in a word,
+as the adult knowledge is drawn upon as revealing the possible career
+open to the child.
+
+It may be of use to distinguish and to relate to each other the logical
+and the psychological aspects of experience--the former standing for
+subject-matter in itself, the latter for it in relation to the child. A
+psychological statement of experience follows its actual growth; it is
+historic; it notes steps actually taken, the uncertain and tortuous, as
+well as the efficient and successful. The logical point of view, on the
+other hand, assumes that the development has reached a certain positive
+stage of fulfilment. It neglects the process and considers the outcome.
+It summarizes and arranges, and thus separates the achieved results from
+the actual steps by which they were forthcoming in the first instance.
+We may compare the difference between the logical and the psychological
+to the difference between the notes which an explorer makes in a new
+country, blazing a trail and finding his way along as best he may,
+and the finished map that is constructed after the country has been
+thoroughly explored. The two are mutually dependent. Without the more
+or less accidental and devious paths traced by the explorer there would
+be no facts which could be utilized in the making of the complete and
+related chart. But no one would get the benefit of the explorer's trip
+if it was not compared and checked up with similar wanderings undertaken
+by others; unless the new geographical facts learned, the streams
+crossed, the mountains climbed, etc., were viewed, not as mere incidents
+in the journey of the particular traveler, but (quite apart from the
+individual explorer's life) in relation to other similar facts already
+known. The map orders individual experiences, connecting them with one
+another irrespective of the local and temporal circumstances and
+accidents of their original discovery.
+
+Of what use is this formulated statement of experience? Of what use is
+the map?
+
+Well, we may first tell what the map is not. The map is not a substitute
+for a personal experience. The map does not take the place of an actual
+journey. The logically formulated material of a science or branch of
+learning, of a study, is no substitute for the having of individual
+experiences. The mathematical formula for a falling body does not take
+the place of personal contact and immediate individual experience with
+the falling thing. But the map, a summary, an arranged and orderly
+view of previous experiences, serves as a guide to future experience;
+it gives direction; it facilitates control; it economizes effort,
+preventing useless wandering, and pointing out the paths which lead most
+quickly and most certainly to a desired result. Through the map every
+new traveler may get for his own journey the benefits of the results
+of others' explorations without the waste of energy and loss of time
+involved in their wanderings--wanderings which he himself would be
+obliged to repeat were it not for just the assistance of the objective
+and generalized record of their performances. That which we call a
+science or study puts the net product of past experience in the
+form which makes it most available for the future. It represents a
+capitalization which may at once be turned to interest. It economizes
+the workings of the mind in every way. Memory is less taxed because the
+facts are grouped together about some common principle, instead of being
+connected solely with the varying incidents of their original discovery.
+Observation is assisted; we know what to look for and where to look.
+It is the difference between looking for a needle in a haystack, and
+searching for a given paper in a well-arranged cabinet. Reasoning is
+directed, because there is a certain general path or line laid out
+along which ideas naturally march, instead of moving from one chance
+association to another.
+
+There is, then, nothing final about a logical rendering of experience.
+Its value is not contained in itself; its significance is that of
+standpoint, outlook, method. It intervenes between the more casual,
+tentative, and roundabout experiences of the past, and more controlled
+and orderly experiences of the future. It gives past experience in that
+net form which renders it most available and most significant, most
+fecund for future experience. The abstractions, generalizations, and
+classifications which it introduces all have prospective meaning.
+
+The formulated result is then not to be opposed to the process of
+growth. The logical is not set over against the psychological. The
+surveyed and arranged result occupies a critical position in the process
+of growth. It marks a turning-point. It shows how we may get the benefit
+of past effort in controlling future endeavor. In the largest sense the
+logical standpoint is itself psychological; it has its meaning as a
+point in the development of experience, and its justification is in its
+functioning in the future growth which it insures.
+
+Hence the need of reinstating into experience the subject-matter of the
+studies, or branches of learning. It must be restored to the experience
+from which it has been abstracted. It needs to be _psychologized_;
+turned over, translated into the immediate and individual experiencing
+within which it has its origin and significance.
+
+Every study or subject thus has two aspects: one for the scientist as a
+scientist; the other for the teacher as a teacher. These two aspects are
+in no sense opposed or conflicting. But neither are they immediately
+identical. For the scientist, the subject-matter represents simply a
+given body of truth to be employed in locating new problems, instituting
+new researches, and carrying them through to a verified outcome. To him
+the subject-matter of the science is self-contained. He refers various
+portions of it to each other; he connects new facts with it. He is not,
+as a scientist, called upon to travel outside its particular bounds;
+if he does, it is only to get more facts of the same general sort.
+The problem of the teacher is a different one. As a teacher he is
+not concerned with adding new facts to the science he teaches; in
+propounding new hypotheses or in verifying them. He is concerned with
+the subject-matter of the science as _representing a given stage and
+phase of the development of experience_. His problem is that of inducing
+a vital and personal experiencing. Hence, what concerns him, as teacher,
+is the ways in which that subject may become a part of experience; what
+there is in the child's present that is usable with reference to it;
+how such elements are to be used; how his own knowledge of the
+subject-matter may assist in interpreting the child's needs and doings,
+and determine the medium in which the child should be placed in order
+that his growth may be properly directed. He is concerned, not with the
+subject-matter as such, but with the subject-matter as a related factor
+in a total and growing experience. Thus to see it is to psychologize it.
+
+It is the failure to keep in mind the double aspect of subject-matter
+which causes the curriculum and child to be set over against each other
+as described in our early pages. The subject-matter, just as it is for
+the scientist, has no direct relationship to the child's present
+experience. It stands outside of it. The danger here is not a merely
+theoretical one. We are practically threatened on all sides. Textbook
+and teacher vie with each other in presenting to the child the
+subject-matter as it stands to the specialist. Such modification and
+revision as it undergoes are a mere elimination of certain scientific
+difficulties, and the general reduction to a lower intellectual level.
+The material is not translated into life-terms, but is directly offered
+as a substitute for, or an external annex to, the child's present life.
+
+Three typical evils result: In the first place, the lack of any organic
+connection with what the child has already seen and felt and loved makes
+the material purely formal and symbolic. There is a sense in which it is
+impossible to value too highly the formal and the symbolic. The genuine
+form, the real symbol, serve as methods in the holding and discovery of
+truth. They are tools by which the individual pushes out most surely and
+widely into unexplored areas. They are means by which he brings to bear
+whatever of reality he has succeeded in gaining in past searchings. But
+this happens only when the symbol really symbolizes--when it stands for
+and sums up in shorthand actual experiences which the individual has
+already gone through. A symbol which is induced from without, which has
+not been led up to in preliminary activities, is, as we say, a _bare_
+or _mere_ symbol; it is dead and barren. Now, any fact, whether of
+arithmetic, or geography, or grammar, which is not led up to and into
+out of something which has previously occupied a significant position
+in the child's life for its own sake, is forced into this position.
+It is not a reality, but just the sign of a reality which _might_ be
+experienced if certain conditions were fulfilled. But the abrupt
+presentation of the fact as something known by others, and requiring
+only to be studied and learned by the child, rules out such conditions
+of fulfilment. It condemns the fact to be a hieroglyph: it would mean
+something if one only had the key. The clue being lacking, it remains
+an idle curiosity, to fret and obstruct the mind, a dead weight to
+burden it.
+
+The second evil in this external presentation is lack of motivation.
+There are not only no facts or truths which have been previously felt
+as such with which to appropriate and assimilate the new, but there is
+no craving, no need, no demand. When the subject-matter has been
+psychologized, that is, viewed as an out-growth of present tendencies
+and activities, it is easy to locate in the present some obstacle,
+intellectual, practical, or ethical, which can be handled more
+adequately if the truth in question be mastered. This need supplies
+motive for the learning. An end which is the child's own carries him
+on to possess the means of its accomplishment. But when material is
+directly supplied in the form of a lesson to be learned as a lesson, the
+connecting links of need and aim are conspicuous for their absence. What
+we mean by the mechanical and dead in instruction is a result of this
+lack of motivation. The organic and vital mean interaction--they mean
+play of mental demand and material supply.
+
+The third evil is that even the most scientific matter, arranged in
+most logical fashion, loses this quality, when presented in external,
+ready-made fashion, by the time it gets to the child. It has to undergo
+some modification in order to shut out some phases too hard to grasp,
+and to reduce some of the attendant difficulties. What happens? Those
+things which are most significant to the scientific man, and most
+valuable in the logic of actual inquiry and classification, drop out.
+The really thought-provoking character is obscured, and the organizing
+function disappears. Or, as we commonly say, the child's reasoning
+powers, the faculty of abstraction and generalization, are not
+adequately developed. So the subject-matter is evacuated of its logical
+value, and, though it is what it is only from the logical standpoint, is
+presented as stuff only for "memory." This is the contradiction: the
+child gets the advantage neither of the adult logical formulation, nor
+of his own native competencies of apprehension and response. Hence
+the logic of the child is hampered and mortified, and we are almost
+fortunate if he does not get actual non-science, flat and common-place
+residua of what was gaining scientific vitality a generation or two
+ago--degenerate reminiscence of what someone else once formulated on the
+basis of the experience that some further person had, once upon a time,
+experienced.
+
+The train of evils does not cease. It is all too common for opposed
+erroneous theories to play straight into each other's hands.
+Psychological considerations may be slurred or shoved one side; they
+cannot be crowded out. Put out of the door, they come back through the
+window. Somehow and somewhere motive must be appealed to, connection
+must be established between the mind and its material. There is no
+question of getting along without this bond of connection; the only
+question is whether it be such as grows out of the material itself in
+relation to the mind, or be imported and hitched on from some outside
+source. If the subject-matter of the lessons be such as to have an
+appropriate place within the expanding consciousness of the child, if it
+grows out of his own past doings, thinkings, and sufferings, and grows
+into application in further achievements and receptivities, then no
+device or trick of method has to be resorted to in order to enlist
+"interest." The psychologized _is_ of interest--that is, it is placed in
+the whole of conscious life so that it shares the worth of that life.
+But the externally presented material, conceived and generated in
+standpoints and attitudes remote from the child, and developed in
+motives alien to him, has no such place of its own. Hence the recourse
+to adventitious leverage to push it in, to factitious drill to drive it
+in, to artificial bribe to lure it in.
+
+Three aspects of this recourse to outside ways for giving the
+subject-matter some psychological meaning may be worth mentioning.
+Familiarity breeds contempt, but it also breeds something like
+affection. We get used to the chains we wear, and we miss them when
+removed. 'Tis an old story that through custom we finally embrace
+what at first wore a hideous mien. Unpleasant, because meaningless,
+activities may get agreeable if long enough persisted in. _It is
+possible for the mind to develop interest in a routine or mechanical
+procedure if conditions are continually supplied which demand that mode
+of operation and preclude any other sort._ I frequently hear dulling
+devices and empty exercises defended and extolled because "the children
+take such an 'interest' in them." Yes, that is the worst of it; the
+mind, shut out from worthy employ and missing the taste of adequate
+performance, comes down to the level of that which is left to it to
+know and do, and perforce takes an interest in a cabined and cramped
+experience. To find satisfaction in its own exercise is the normal law
+of mind, and if large and meaningful business for the mind be denied, it
+tries to content itself with the formal movements that remain to it--and
+too often succeeds, save in those cases of more intense activity which
+cannot accommodate themselves, and that make up the unruly and
+_declasse_ of our school product. An interest in the formal apprehension
+of symbols and in their memorized reproduction becomes in many pupils
+a substitute for the original and vital interest in reality; and all
+because, the subject-matter of the course of study being out of relation
+to the concrete mind of the individual, some substitute bond to hold it
+in some kind of working relation to the mind must be discovered and
+elaborated.
+
+The second substitute for living motivation in the subject-matter is
+that of contrast-effects; the material of the lesson is rendered
+interesting, if not in itself, at least in contrast with some
+alternative experience. To learn the lesson is more interesting than to
+take a scolding, be held up to general ridicule, stay after school,
+receive degradingly low marks, or fail to be promoted. And very much of
+what goes by the name of "discipline," and prides itself upon opposing
+the doctrines of a soft pedagogy and upon upholding the banner of effort
+and duty, is nothing more or less than just this appeal to "interest" in
+its obverse aspect--to fear, to dislike of various kinds of physical,
+social, and personal pain. The subject-matter does not appeal; it cannot
+appeal; it lacks origin and bearing in a growing experience. So the
+appeal is to the thousand and one outside and irrelevant agencies which
+may serve to throw, by sheer rebuff and rebound, the mind back upon the
+material from which it is constantly wandering.
+
+Human nature being what it is, however, it tends to seek its motivation
+in the agreeable rather than in the disagreeable, in direct pleasure
+rather than in alternative pain. And so has come up the modern theory
+and practice of the "interesting," in the false sense of that term. The
+material is still left; so far as its own characteristics are concerned,
+just material externally selected and formulated. It is still just
+so much geography and arithmetic and grammar study; not so much
+potentiality of child-experience with regard to language, earth, and
+numbered and measured reality. Hence the difficulty of bringing the mind
+to bear upon it; hence its repulsiveness; the tendency for attention to
+wander; for other acts and images to crowd in and expel the lesson.
+The legitimate way out is to transform the material; to psychologize
+it--that is, once more, to take it and to develop it within the range
+and scope of the child's life. But it is easier and simpler to leave it
+as it is, and then by trick of method to _arouse_ interest, to _make_ it
+_interesting_; to cover it with sugar-coating; to conceal its barrenness
+by intermediate and unrelated material; and finally, as it were, to get
+the child to swallow and digest the unpalatable morsel while he is
+enjoying tasting something quite different. But alas for the analogy!
+Mental assimilation is a matter of consciousness; and if the attention
+has not been playing upon the actual material, that has not been
+apprehended, nor worked into faculty.
+
+How, then, stands the case of Child _vs._ Curriculum? What shall the
+verdict be? The radical fallacy in the original pleadings with which we
+set out is the supposition that we have no choice save either to leave
+the child to his own unguided spontaneity or to inspire direction upon
+him from without. Action is response; it is adaptation, adjustment.
+There is no such thing as sheer self-activity possible--because all
+activity takes place in a medium, in a situation, and with reference to
+its conditions. But, again, no such thing as imposition of truth from
+without, as insertion of truth from without, is possible. All depends
+upon the activity which the mind itself undergoes in responding to what
+is presented from without. Now, the value of the formulated wealth of
+knowledge that makes up the course of study is that it may enable the
+educator to _determine the environment of the child_, and thus by
+indirection to direct. Its primary value, its primary indication, is for
+the teacher, not for the child. It says to the teacher: Such and such
+are the capacities, the fulfilments, in truth and beauty and behavior,
+open to these children. Now see to it that day by day the conditions are
+such that _their own activities_ move inevitably in this direction,
+toward such culmination of themselves. Let the child's nature fulfil its
+own destiny, revealed to you in whatever of science and art and industry
+the world now holds as its own.
+
+The case is of Child. It is his present powers which are to assert
+themselves; his present capacities which are to be exercised; his
+present attitudes which are to be realized. But save as the teacher
+knows, knows wisely and thoroughly, the race-expression which is
+embodied in that thing we call the Curriculum, the teacher knows neither
+what the present power, capacity, or attitude is, nor yet how it is to
+be asserted, exercised, and realized.
+
+
+
+
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+
+
+Transcriber's note.
+
+Two half-title pages have been omitted.
+
+
+
+***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE CHILD AND THE CURRICULUM***
+
+
+******* This file should be named 29259.txt or 29259.zip *******
+
+
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/2/9/2/5/29259
+
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://www.gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://www.gutenberg.org/about/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit:
+http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+