diff options
Diffstat (limited to '2926-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 2926-h/2926-h.htm | 1148 |
1 files changed, 1148 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2926-h/2926-h.htm b/2926-h/2926-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7d0cc8e --- /dev/null +++ b/2926-h/2926-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,1148 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?> + +<!DOCTYPE html + PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd" > + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"> + <head> + <title> + Lecture to Working Men, No. 5 (of 6), The Present Condition of Organic + Nature, A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE POSITION OF MR. DARWIN'S WORK by + Thomas H. Huxley + </title> + <style type="text/css" xml:space="preserve"> + + body { margin:5%; background:#faebd0; text-align:justify} + P { text-indent: 1em; margin-top: .25em; margin-bottom: .25em; } + H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; margin-left: 15%; margin-right: 15%; } + hr { width: 50%; text-align: center;} + .foot { margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%; text-align: justify; text-indent: -3em; font-size: 90%; } + blockquote {font-size: 97%; font-style: italic; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;} + .mynote {background-color: #DDE; color: #000; padding: .5em; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 95%;} + .toc { margin-left: 10%; margin-bottom: .75em;} + .toc2 { margin-left: 20%;} + div.fig { display:block; margin:0 auto; text-align:center; } + div.middle { margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%; text-align: justify; } + .figleft {float: left; margin-left: 0%; margin-right: 1%;} + .figright {float: right; margin-right: 0%; margin-left: 1%;} + .pagenum {display:inline; font-size: 70%; font-style:normal; + margin: 0; padding: 0; position: absolute; right: 1%; + text-align: right;} + pre { font-style: italic; font-size: 90%; margin-left: 10%;} + +</style> + </head> + <body> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of A Critical Examination Of The Position Of +Mr. Darwin's Work, "On The Origin Of Species," In Relation To The Complete Theory Of The Causes Of The Phenomena Of Organic Nature, by Thomas H. Huxley + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: A Critical Examination Of The Position Of Mr. Darwin's Work, "On The Origin Of Species," In Relation To The Complete Theory Of The Causes Of The Phenomena Of Organic Nature + Lecture VI. (of VI.), Lectures To Working Men, at the + Museum of Practical Geology, 1863, On Darwin's work: "Origin + of Species" + +Author: Thomas H. Huxley + +Release Date: January 4, 2009 [EBook #2926] +Last Updated: January 22, 2013 + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES *** + + + + +Produced by Amy E. Zelmer, and David Widger + + + + + + +</pre> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <h1> + A CRITICAL EXAMINATION <br />OF THE POSITION<br />OF MR. DARWIN'S WORK, + <br />"ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES," + </h1> + <h2> + IN RELATION TO THE COMPLETE THEORY OF THE CAUSES OF THE PHENOMENA OF + ORGANIC NATURE + </h2> + <p> + <br /> + </p> + <h3> + Lecture VI. (of VI.), "Lectures To Working Men", at the Museum of + Practical Geology, 1863, On Darwin's work: "Origin of Species". + </h3> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <h2> + By Thomas H. Huxley + </h2> + <p> + <br /> <br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <br /> <br /> + </p> + <p> + IN the preceding five lectures I have endeavoured to give you an account + of those facts, and of those reasonings from facts, which form the data + upon which all theories regarding the causes of the phenomena of organic + nature must be based. And, although I have had frequent occasion to quote + Mr. Darwin—as all persons hereafter, in speaking upon these + subjects, will have occasion to quote his famous book on the "Origin of + Species,"—you must yet remember that, wherever I have quoted him, it + has not been upon theoretical points, or for statements in any way + connected with his particular speculations, but on matters of fact, + brought forward by himself, or collected by himself, and which appear + incidentally in his book. If a man 'will' make a book, professing to + discuss a single question, an encyclopaedia, I cannot help it. + </p> + <p> + Now, having had an opportunity of considering in this sort of way the + different statements bearing upon all theories whatsoever, I have to lay + before you, as fairly as I can, what is Mr. Darwin's view of the matter + and what position his theories hold, when judged by the principles which I + have previously laid down, as deciding our judgments upon all theories and + hypotheses. + </p> + <p> + I have already stated to you that the inquiry respecting the causes of the + phenomena of organic nature resolves itself into two problems—the + first being the question of the origination of living or organic beings; + and the second being the totally distinct problem of the modification and + perpetuation of organic beings when they have already come into existence. + The first question Mr. Darwin does not touch; he does not deal with it at + all; but he says—given the origin of organic matter—supposing + its creation to have already taken place, my object is to show in + consequence of what laws and what demonstrable properties of organic + matter, and of its environments, such states of organic nature as those + with which we are acquainted must have come about. This, you will observe, + is a perfectly legitimate proposition; every person has a right to define + the limits of the inquiry which he sets before himself; and yet it is a + most singular thing that in all the multifarious, and, not unfrequently, + ignorant attacks which have been made upon the 'Origin of Species', there + is nothing which has been more speciously criticised than this particular + limitation. If people have nothing else to urge against the book, they say—"Well, + after all, you see, Mr. Darwin's explanation of the 'Origin of Species' is + not good for much, because, in the long run, he admits that he does not + know how organic matter began to exist. But if you admit any special + creation for the first particle of organic matter you may just as well + admit it for all the rest; five hundred or five thousand distinct + creations are just as intelligible, and just as little difficult to + understand, as one." The answer to these cavils is two-fold. In the first + place, all human inquiry must stop somewhere; all our knowledge and all + our investigation cannot take us beyond the limits set by the finite and + restricted character of our faculties, or destroy the endless unknown, + which accompanies, like its shadow, the endless procession of phenomena. + So far as I can venture to offer an opinion on such a matter, the purpose + of our being in existence, the highest object that human beings can set + before themselves, is not the pursuit of any such chimera as the + annihilation of the unknown; but it is simply the unwearied endeavour to + remove its boundaries a little further from our little sphere of action. + </p> + <p> + I wonder if any historian would for a moment admit the objection, that it + is preposterous to trouble ourselves about the history of the Roman + Empire, because we do not know anything positive about the origin and + first building of the city of Rome! Would it be a fair objection to urge, + respecting the sublime discoveries of a Newton, or a Kepler, those great + philosophers, whose discoveries have been of the profoundest benefit and + service to all men,—to say to them—"After all that you have + told us as to how the planets revolve, and how they are maintained in + their orbits, you cannot tell us what is the cause of the origin of the + sun, moon, and stars. So what is the use of what you have done?" Yet these + objections would not be one whit more preposterous than the objections + which have been made to the 'Origin of Species.' Mr. Darwin, then, had a + perfect right to limit his inquiry as he pleased, and the only question + for us—the inquiry being so limited—is to ascertain whether + the method of his inquiry is sound or unsound; whether he has obeyed the + canons which must guide and govern all investigation, or whether he has + broken them; and it was because our inquiry this evening is essentially + limited to that question, that I spent a good deal of time in a former + lecture (which, perhaps, some of you thought might have been better + employed), in endeavouring to illustrate the method and nature of + scientific inquiry in general. We shall now have to put in practice the + principles that I then laid down. + </p> + <p> + I stated to you in substance, if not in words, that wherever there are + complex masses of phenomena to be inquired into, whether they be phenomena + of the affairs of daily life, or whether they belong to the more abstruse + and difficult problems laid before the philosopher, our course of + proceeding in unravelling that complex chain of phenomena with a view to + get at its cause, is always the same; in all cases we must invent an + hypothesis; we must place before ourselves some more or less likely + supposition respecting that cause; and then, having assumed an hypothesis, + having supposed cause for the phenomena in question, we must endeavour, on + the one hand, to demonstrate our hypothesis, or, on the other, to upset + and reject it altogether, by testing it in three ways. We must, in the + first place, be prepared to prove that the supposed causes of the + phenomena exist in nature; that they are what the logicians call 'vera + causae'—true causes;—in the next place, we should be prepared + to show that the assumed causes of the phenomena are competent to produce + such phenomena as those which we wish to explain by them; and in the last + place, we ought to be able to show that no other known causes are + competent to produce those phenomena. If we can succeed in satisfying + these three conditions we shall have demonstrated our hypothesis; or + rather I ought to say we shall have proved it as far as certainty is + possible for us; for, after all, there is no one of our surest convictions + which may not be upset, or at any rate modified by a further accession of + knowledge. It was because it satisfied these conditions that we accepted + the hypothesis as to the disappearance of the tea-pot and spoons in the + case I supposed in a previous lecture; we found that our hypothesis on + that subject was tenable and valid, because the supposed cause existed in + nature, because it was competent to account for the phenomena, and because + no other known cause was competent to account for them; and it is upon + similar grounds that any hypothesis you choose to name is accepted in + science as tenable and valid. + </p> + <p> + What is Mr. Darwin's hypothesis? As I apprehend it—for I have put it + into a shape more convenient for common purposes than I could find + 'verbatim' in his book—as I apprehend it, I say, it is, that all the + phenomena of organic nature, past and present, result from, or are caused + by, the inter-action of those properties of organic matter, which we have + called ATAVISM and VARIABILITY, with the CONDITIONS OF EXISTENCE; or, in + other words,—given the existence of organic matter, its tendency to + transmit its properties, and its tendency occasionally to vary; and, + lastly, given the conditions of existence by which organic matter is + surrounded—that these put together are the causes of the Present and + of the Past conditions of ORGANIC NATURE. + </p> + <p> + Such is the hypothesis as I understand it. Now let us see how it will + stand the various tests which I laid down just now. In the first place, do + these supposed causes of the phenomena exist in nature? Is it the fact + that in nature these properties of organic matter—atavism and + variability—and those phenomena which we have called the conditions + of existence,—is it true that they exist? Well, of course, if they + do not exist, all that I have told you in the last three or four lectures + must be incorrect, because I have been attempting to prove that they do + exist, and I take it that there is abundant evidence that they do exist; + so far, therefore, the hypothesis does not break down. + </p> + <p> + But in the next place comes a much more difficult inquiry:—Are the + causes indicated competent to give rise to the phenomena of organic + nature? I suspect that this is indubitable to a certain extent. It is + demonstrable, I think, as I have endeavoured to show you, that they are + perfectly competent to give rise to all the phenomena which are exhibited + by RACES in nature. Furthermore, I believe that they are quite competent + to account for all that we may call purely structural phenomena which are + exhibited by SPECIES in nature. On that point also I have already enlarged + somewhat. Again, I think that the causes assumed are competent to account + for most of the physiological characteristics of species, and I not only + think that they are competent to account for them, but I think that they + account for many things which otherwise remain wholly unaccountable and + inexplicable, and I may say incomprehensible. For a full exposition of the + grounds on which this conviction is based, I must refer you to Mr. + Darwin's work; all that I can do now is to illustrate what I have said by + two or three cases taken almost at random. + </p> + <p> + I drew your attention, on a previous evening, to the facts which are + embodied in our systems of Classification, which are the results of the + examination and comparison of the different members of the animal kingdom + one with another. I mentioned that the whole of the animal kingdom is + divisible into five sub-kingdoms; that each of these sub-kingdoms is again + divisible into provinces; that each province may be divided into classes, + and the classes into the successively smaller groups, orders, families, + genera, and species. + </p> + <p> + Now, in each of these groups, the resemblance in structure among the + members of the group is closer in proportion as the group is smaller. + Thus, a man and a worm are members of the animal kingdom in virtue of + certain apparently slight though really fundamental resemblances which + they present. But a man and a fish are members of the same sub-kingdom + 'Vertebrata', because they are much more like one another than either of + them is to a worm, or a snail, or any member of the other sub-kingdoms. + For similar reasons men and horses are arranged as members of the same + Class, 'Mammalia'; men and apes as members of the same Order, 'Primates'; + and if there were any animals more like men than they were like any of the + apes, and yet different from men in important and constant particulars of + their organization, we should rank them as members of the same Family, or + of the same Genus, but as of distinct Species. + </p> + <p> + That it is possible to arrange all the varied forms of animals into + groups, having this sort of singular subordination one to the other, is a + very remarkable circumstance; but, as Mr. Darwin remarks, this is a result + which is quite to be expected, if the principles which he lays down be + correct. Take the case of the races which are known to be produced by the + operation of atavism and variability, and the conditions of existence + which check and modify these tendencies. Take the case of the pigeons that + I brought before you; there it was shown that they might be all classed as + belonging to some one of five principal divisions, and that within these + divisions other subordinate groups might be formed. The members of these + groups are related to one another in just the same way as the genera of a + family, and the groups themselves as the families of an order, or the + orders of a class; while all have the same sort of structural relations + with the wild rock-pigeon, as the members of any great natural group have + with a real or imaginary typical form. Now, we know that all varieties of + pigeons of every kind have arisen by a process of selective breeding from + a common stock, the rock-pigeon; hence, you see, that if all species of + animals have proceeded from some common stock, the general character of + their structural relations, and of our systems of classification, which + express those relations, would be just what we find them to be. In other + words, the hypothetical cause is, so far, competent to produce effects + similar to those of the real cause. + </p> + <p> + Take, again, another set of very remarkable facts,—the existence of + what are called rudimentary organs, organs for which we can find no + obvious use, in the particular animal economy in which they are found, and + yet which are there. + </p> + <p> + Such are the splint-like bones in the leg of the horse, which I here show + you, and which correspond with bones which belong to certain toes and + fingers in the human hand and foot. In the horse you see they are quite + rudimentary, and bear neither toes nor fingers; so that the horse has only + one "finger" in his fore-foot and one "toe" in his hind foot. But it is a + very curious thing that the animals closely allied to the horse show more + toes than he; as the rhinoceros, for instance: he has these extra toes + well formed, and anatomical facts show very clearly that he is very + closely related to the horse indeed. So we may say that animals, in an + anatomical sense nearly related to the horse, have those parts which are + rudimentary in him, fully developed. + </p> + <p> + Again, the sheep and the cow have no cutting-teeth, but only a hard pad in + the upper jaw. That is the common characteristic of ruminants in general. + But the calf has in its upper jaw some rudiments of teeth which never are + developed, and never play the part of teeth at all. Well, if you go back + in time, you find some of the older, now extinct, allies of the ruminants + have well-developed teeth in their upper jaws; and at the present day the + pig (which is in structure closely connected with ruminants) has + well-developed teeth in its upper jaw; so that here is another instance of + organs well-developed and very useful, in one animal, represented by + rudimentary organs, for which we can discover no purpose whatsoever, in + another closely allied animal. The whalebone whale, again, has horny + "whalebone" plates in its mouth, and no teeth; but the young foetal whale, + before it is born, has teeth in its jaws; they, however, are never used, + and they never come to anything. But other members of the group to which + the whale belongs have well-developed teeth in both jaws. + </p> + <p> + Upon any hypothesis of special creation, facts of this kind appear to me + to be entirely unaccountable and inexplicable, but they cease to be so if + you accept Mr. Darwin's hypothesis, and see reason for believing that the + whalebone whale and the whale with teeth in its mouth both sprang from a + whale that had teeth, and that the teeth of the foetal whale are merely + remnants—recollections, if we may so say—of the extinct whale. + So in the case of the horse and the rhinoceros: suppose that both have + descended by modification from some earlier form which had the normal + number of toes, and the persistence of the rudimentary bones which no + longer support toes in the horse becomes comprehensible. + </p> + <p> + In the language that we speak in England, and in the language of the + Greeks, there are identical verbal roots, or elements entering into the + composition of words. That fact remains unintelligible so long as we + suppose English and Greek to be independently created tongues; but when it + is shown that both languages are descended from one original, the + Sanscrit, we give an explanation of that resemblance. In the same way the + existence of identical structural roots, if I may so term them, entering + into the composition of widely different animals, is striking evidence in + favour of the descent of those animals from a common original. + </p> + <p> + To turn to another kind of illustration:—If you regard the whole + series of stratified rocks—that enormous thickness of sixty or + seventy thousand feet that I have mentioned before, constituting the only + record we have of a most prodigious lapse of time, that time being, in all + probability, but a fraction of that of which we have no record;—if + you observe in these successive strata of rocks successive groups of + animals arising and dying out, a constant succession, giving you the same + kind of impression, as you travel from one group of strata to another, as + you would have in travelling from one country to another;—when you + find this constant succession of forms, their traces obliterated except to + the man of science,—when you look at this wonderful history, and ask + what it means, it is only a paltering with words if you are offered the + reply,—'They were so created.' + </p> + <p> + But if, on the other hand, you look on all forms of organized beings as + the results of the gradual modification of a primitive type, the facts + receive a meaning, and you see that these older conditions are the + necessary predecessors of the present. Viewed in this light the facts of + palaeontology receive a meaning—upon any other hypothesis, I am + unable to see, in the slightest degree, what knowledge or signification we + are to draw out of them. Again, note as bearing upon the same point, the + singular likeness which obtains between the successive Faunae and Florae, + whose remains are preserved on the rocks: you never find any great and + enormous difference between the immediately successive Faunae and Florae, + unless you have reason to believe there has also been a great lapse of + time or a great change of conditions. The animals, for instance, of the + newest tertiary rocks, in any part of the world, are always, and without + exception, found to be closely allied with those which now live in that + part of the world. For example, in Europe, Asia, and Africa, the large + mammals are at present rhinoceroses, hippopotamuses, elephants, lions, + tigers, oxen, horses, etc.; and if you examine the newest tertiary + deposits, which contain the animals and plants which immediately preceded + those which now exist in the same country, you do not find gigantic + specimens of ant-eaters and kangaroos, but you find rhinoceroses, + elephants, lions, tigers, etc.,—of different species to those now + living,—but still their close allies. If you turn to South America, + where, at the present day, we have great sloths and armadilloes and + creatures of that kind, what do you find in the newest tertiaries? You + find the great sloth-like creature, the 'Megatherium', and the great + armadillo, the 'Glyptodon', and so on. And if you go to Australia you find + the same law holds good, namely, that that condition of organic nature + which has preceded the one which now exists, presents differences perhaps + of species, and of genera, but that the great types of organic structure + are the same as those which now flourish. + </p> + <p> + What meaning has this fact upon any other hypothesis or supposition than + one of successive modification? But if the population of the world, in any + age, is the result of the gradual modification of the forms which peopled + it in the preceding age,—if that has been the case, it is + intelligible enough; because we may expect that the creature that results + from the modification of an elephantine mammal shall be something like an + elephant, and the creature which is produced by the modification of an + armadillo-like mammal shall be like an armadillo. Upon that supposition, I + say, the facts are intelligible; upon any other, that I am aware of, they + are not. + </p> + <p> + So far, the facts of palaeontology are consistent with almost any form of + the doctrine of progressive modification; they would not be absolutely + inconsistent with the wild speculations of De Maillet, or with the less + objectionable hypothesis of Lamarck. But Mr. Darwin's views have one + peculiar merit; and that is, that they are perfectly consistent with an + array of facts which are utterly inconsistent with and fatal to, any other + hypothesis of progressive modification which has yet been advanced. It is + one remarkable peculiarity of Mr. Darwin's hypothesis that it involves no + necessary progression or incessant modification, and that it is perfectly + consistent with the persistence for any length of time of a given + primitive stock, contemporaneously with its modifications. To return to + the case of the domestic breeds of pigeons, for example; you have the + Dove-cot pigeon, which closely resembles the Rock pigeon, from which they + all started, existing at the same time with the others. And if species are + developed in the same way in nature, a primitive stock and its + modifications may, occasionally, all find the conditions fitted for their + existence; and though they come into competition, to a certain extent, + with one another, the derivative species may not necessarily extirpate the + primitive one, or 'vice versa'. + </p> + <p> + Now palaeontology shows us many facts which are perfectly harmonious with + these observed effects of the process by which Mr. Darwin supposes species + to have originated, but which appear to me to be totally inconsistent with + any other hypothesis which has been proposed. There are some groups of + animals and plants, in the fossil world, which have been said to belong to + "persistent types," because they have persisted, with very little change + indeed, through a very great range of time, while everything about them + has changed largely. There are families of fishes whose type of + construction has persisted all the way from the carboniferous rock right + up to the cretaceous; and others which have lasted through almost the + whole range of the secondary rocks, and from the lias to the older + tertiaries. It is something stupendous this—to consider a genus + lasting without essential modifications through all this enormous lapse of + time while almost everything else was changed and modified. + </p> + <p> + Thus I have no doubt that Mr. Darwin's hypothesis will be found competent + to explain the majority of the phenomena exhibited by species in nature; + but in an earlier lecture I spoke cautiously with respect to its power of + explaining all the physiological peculiarities of species. + </p> + <p> + There is, in fact, one set of these peculiarities which the theory of + selective modification, as it stands at present, is not wholly competent + to explain, and that is the group of phenomena which I mentioned to you + under the name of Hybridism, and which I explained to consist in the + sterility of the offspring of certain species when crossed one with + another. It matters not one whit whether this sterility is universal, or + whether it exists only in a single case. Every hypothesis is bound to + explain, or, at any rate, not be inconsistent with, the whole of the facts + which it professes to account for; and if there is a single one of these + facts which can be shown to be inconsistent with (I do not merely mean + inexplicable by, but contrary to) the hypothesis, the hypothesis falls to + the ground,—it is worth nothing. One fact with which it is + positively inconsistent is worth as much, and as powerful in negativing + the hypothesis, as five hundred. If I am right in thus defining the + obligations of an hypothesis, Mr. Darwin, in order to place his views + beyond the reach of all possible assault, ought to be able to demonstrate + the possibility of developing from a particular stock by selective + breeding, two forms, which should either be unable to cross one with + another, or whose cross-bred offspring should be infertile with one + another. + </p> + <p> + For, you see, if you have not done that you have not strictly fulfilled + all the conditions of the problem; you have not shown that you can + produce, by the cause assumed, all the phenomena which you have in nature. + Here are the phenomena of Hybridism staring you in the face, and you + cannot say, 'I can, by selective modification, produce these same + results.' Now, it is admitted on all hands that, at present, so far as + experiments have gone, it has not been found possible to produce this + complete physiological divergence by selective breeding. I stated this + very clearly before, and I now refer to the point, because, if it could be + proved, not only that this 'has' not been done, but that it 'cannot' be + done; if it could be demonstrated that it is impossible to breed + selectively, from any stock, a form which shall not breed with another, + produced from the same stock; and if we were shown that this must be the + necessary and inevitable results of all experiments, I hold that Mr. + Darwin's hypothesis would be utterly shattered. + </p> + <p> + But has this been done? or what is really the state of the case? It is + simply that, so far as we have gone yet with our breeding, we have not + produced from a common stock two breeds which are not more or less fertile + with one another. + </p> + <p> + I do not know that there is a single fact which would justify any one in + saying that any degree of sterility has been observed between breeds + absolutely known to have been produced by selective breeding from a common + stock. On the other hand, I do not know that there is a single fact which + can justify any one in asserting that such sterility cannot be produced by + proper experimentation. For my own part, I see every reason to believe + that it may, and will be so produced. For, as Mr. Darwin has very properly + urged, when we consider the phenomena of sterility, we find they are most + capricious; we do not know what it is that the sterility depends on. There + are some animals which will not breed in captivity; whether it arises from + the simple fact of their being shut up and deprived of their liberty, or + not, we do not know, but they certainly will not breed. What an astounding + thing this is, to find one of the most important of all functions + annihilated by mere imprisonment! + </p> + <p> + So, again, there are cases known of animals which have been thought by + naturalists to be undoubted species, which have yielded perfectly fertile + hybrids; while there are other species which present what everybody + believes to be varieties <a href="#linknote-1" name="linknoteref-1" + id="linknoteref-1"><small>1</small></a> which are more or less infertile + with one another. There are other cases which are truly extraordinary; + there is one, for example, which has been carefully examined,—of two + kinds of sea-weed, of which the male element of the one, which we may call + A, fertilizes the female element of the other, B; while the male element + of B will not fertilize the female element of A; so that, while the former + experiment seems to show us that they are 'varieties', the latter leads to + the conviction that they are 'species'. + </p> + <p> + When we see how capricious and uncertain this sterility is, how unknown + the conditions on which it depends, I say that we have no right to affirm + that those conditions will not be better understood by and by, and we have + no ground for supposing that we may not be able to experiment so as to + obtain that crucial result which I mentioned just now. So that though Mr. + Darwin's hypothesis does not completely extricate us from this difficulty + at present, we have not the least right to say it will not do so. + </p> + <p> + There is a wide gulf between the thing you cannot explain and the thing + that upsets you altogether. There is hardly any hypothesis in this world + which has not some fact in connection with it which has not been + explained, but that is a very different affair to a fact that entirely + opposes your hypothesis; in this case all you can say is, that your + hypothesis is in the same position as a good many others. + </p> + <p> + Now, as to the third test, that there are no other causes competent to + explain the phenomena, I explained to you that one should be able to say + of an hypothesis, that no other known causes than those supposed by it are + competent to give rise to the phenomena. Here, I think, Mr. Darwin's view + is pretty strong. I really believe that the alternative is either + Darwinism or nothing, for I do not know of any rational conception or + theory of the organic universe which has any scientific position at all + beside Mr. Darwin's. I do not know of any proposition that has been put + before us with the intention of explaining the phenomena of organic + nature, which has in its favour a thousandth part of the evidence which + may be adduced in favour of Mr. Darwin's views. Whatever may be the + objections to his views, certainly all others are absolutely out of court. + </p> + <p> + Take the Lamarckian hypothesis, for example. Lamarck was a great + naturalist, and to a certain extent went the right way to work; he argued + from what was undoubtedly a true cause of some of the phenomena of organic + nature. He said it is a matter of experience that an animal may be + modified more or less in consequence of its desires and consequent + actions. Thus, if a man exercise himself as a blacksmith, his arms will + become strong and muscular; such organic modification is a result of this + particular action and exercise. Lamarck thought that by a very simple + supposition based on this truth he could explain the origin of the various + animal species: he said, for example, that the short-legged birds which + live on fish had been converted into the long-legged waders by desiring to + get the fish without wetting their bodies, and so stretching their legs + more and more through successive generations. If Lamarck could have shown + experimentally, that even races of animals could be produced in this way, + there might have been some ground for his speculations. But he could show + nothing of the kind, and his hypothesis has pretty well dropped into + oblivion, as it deserved to do. I said in an earlier lecture that there + are hypotheses and hypotheses, and when people tell you that Mr. Darwin's + strongly-based hypothesis is nothing but a mere modification of Lamarck's, + you will know what to think of their capacity for forming a judgment on + this subject. + </p> + <p> + But you must recollect that when I say I think it is either Mr. Darwin's + hypothesis or nothing; that either we must take his view, or look upon the + whole of organic nature as an enigma, the meaning of which is wholly + hidden from us; you must understand that I mean that I accept it + provisionally, in exactly the same way as I accept any other hypothesis. + Men of science do not pledge themselves to creeds; they are bound by + articles of no sort; there is not a single belief that it is not a bounden + duty with them to hold with a light hand and to part with it cheerfully, + the moment it is really proved to be contrary to any fact, great or small. + And if, in course of time I see good reasons for such a proceeding, I + shall have no hesitation in coming before you, and pointing out any change + in my opinion without finding the slightest occasion to blush for so + doing. So I say that we accept this view as we accept any other, so long + as it will help us, and we feel bound to retain it only so long as it will + serve our great purpose—the improvement of Man's estate and the + widening of his knowledge. The moment this, or any other conception, + ceases to be useful for these purposes, away with it to the four winds; we + care not what becomes of it! + </p> + <p> + But to say truth, although it has been my business to attend closely to + the controversies roused by the publication of Mr. Darwin's book, I think + that not one of the enormous mass of objections and obstacles which have + been raised is of any very great value, except that sterility case which I + brought before you just now. All the rest are misunderstandings of some + sort, arising either from prejudice, or want of knowledge, or still more + from want of patience and care in reading the work. + </p> + <p> + For you must recollect that it is not a book to be read with as much ease + as its pleasant style may lead you to imagine. You spin through it as if + it were a novel the first time you read it, and think you know all about + it; the second time you read it you think you know rather less about it; + and the third time, you are amazed to find how little you have really + apprehended its vast scope and objects. I can positively say that I never + take it up without finding in it some new view, or light, or suggestion + that I have not noticed before. That is the best characteristic of a + thorough and profound book; and I believe this feature of the 'Origin of + Species' explains why so many persons have ventured to pass judgment and + criticisms upon it which are by no means worth the paper they are written + on. + </p> + <p> + Before concluding these lectures there is one point to which I must + advert,—though, as Mr. Darwin has said nothing about man in his + book, it concerns myself rather than him;—for I have strongly + maintained on sundry occasions that if Mr. Darwin's views are sound, they + apply as much to man as to the lower mammals, seeing that it is perfectly + demonstrable that the structural differences which separate man from the + apes are not greater than those which separate some apes from others. + There cannot be the slightest doubt in the world that the argument which + applies to the improvement of the horse from an earlier stock, or of ape + from ape, applies to the improvement of man from some simpler and lower + stock than man. There is not a single faculty—functional or + structural, moral, intellectual, or instinctive,—there is no faculty + whatever that is not capable of improvement; there is no faculty + whatsoever which does not depend upon structure, and as structure tends to + vary, it is capable of being improved. + </p> + <p> + Well, I have taken a good deal of pains at various times to prove this, + and I have endeavoured to meet the objections of those who maintain, that + the structural differences between man and the lower animals are of so + vast a character and enormous extent, that even if Mr. Darwin's views are + correct, you cannot imagine this particular modification to take place. It + is, in fact, easy matter to prove that, so far as structure is concerned, + man differs to no greater extent from the animals which are immediately + below him than these do from other members of the same order. Upon the + other hand, there is no one who estimates more highly than I do the + dignity of human nature, and the width of the gulf in intellectual and + moral matters, which lies between man and the whole of the lower creation. + </p> + <p> + But I find this very argument brought forward vehemently by some. "You say + that man has proceeded from a modification of some lower animal, and you + take pains to prove that the structural differences which are said to + exist in his brain do not exist at all, and you teach that all functions, + intellectual, moral, and others, are the expression or the result, in the + long run, of structures, and of the molecular forces which they exert." It + is quite true that I do so. + </p> + <p> + "Well, but," I am told at once, somewhat triumphantly, "you say in the + same breath that there is a great moral and intellectual chasm between man + and the lower animals. How is this possible when you declare that moral + and intellectual characteristics depend on structure, and yet tell us that + there is no such gulf between the structure of man and that of the lower + animals?" + </p> + <p> + I think that objection is based upon a misconception of the real relations + which exist between structure and function, between mechanism and work. + Function is the expression of molecular forces and arrangements no doubt; + but, does it follow from this, that variation in function so depends upon + variation in structure that the former is always exactly proportioned to + the latter? If there is no such relation, if the variation in function + which follows on a variation in structure, may be enormously greater than + the variation of the structure, then, you see, the objection falls to the + ground. + </p> + <p> + Take a couple of watches—made by the same maker, and as completely + alike as possible; set them upon the table, and the function of each—which + is its rate of going—will be performed in the same manner, and you + shall be able to distinguish no difference between them; but let me take a + pair of pincers, and if my hand is steady enough to do it, let me just + lightly crush together the bearings of the balance-wheel, or force to a + slightly different angle the teeth of the escapement of one of them, and + of course you know the immediate result will be that the watch, so + treated, from that moment will cease to go. But what proportion is there + between the structural alteration and the functional result? Is it not + perfectly obvious that the alteration is of the minutest kind, yet that + slight as it is, it has produced an infinite difference in the performance + of the functions of these two instruments? + </p> + <p> + Well, now, apply that to the present question. What is it that constitutes + and makes man what he is? What is it but his power of language—that + language giving him the means of recording his experience—making + every generation somewhat wiser than its predecessor,—more in + accordance with the established order of the universe? + </p> + <p> + What is it but this power of speech, of recording experience, which + enables men to be men—looking before and after and, in some dim + sense, understanding the working of this wondrous universe—and which + distinguishes man from the whole of the brute world? I say that this + functional difference is vast, unfathomable, and truly infinite in its + consequences; and I say at the same time, that it may depend upon + structural differences which shall be absolutely inappreciable to us with + our present means of investigation. What is this very speech that we are + talking about? I am speaking to you at this moment, but if you were to + alter, in the minutest degree, the proportion of the nervous forces now + active in the two nerves which supply the muscles of my glottis, I should + become suddenly dumb. The voice is produced only so long as the vocal + chords are parallel; and these are parallel only so long as certain + muscles contract with exact equality; and that again depends on the + equality of action of those two nerves I spoke of. So that a change of the + minutest kind in the structure of one of these nerves, or in the structure + of the part in which it originates, or of the supply of blood to that + part, or of one of the muscles to which it is distributed, might render + all of us dumb. But a race of dumb men, deprived of all communication with + those who could speak, would be little indeed removed from the brutes. And + the moral and intellectual difference between them and ourselves would be + practically infinite, though the naturalist should not be able to find a + single shadow of even specific structural difference. + </p> + <p> + But let me dismiss this question now, and, in conclusion, let me say that + you may go away with it as my mature conviction, that Mr. Darwin's work is + the greatest contribution which has been made to biological science since + the publication of the 'Regne Animal' of Cuvier, and since that of the + 'History of Development' of Von Baer. I believe that if you strip it of + its theoretical part it still remains one of the greatest encyclopaedias + of biological doctrine that any one man ever brought forth; and I believe + that, if you take it as the embodiment of an hypothesis, it is destined to + be the guide of biological and psychological speculation for the next + three or four generations. + </p> + <p> + <a name="linknote-1" id="linknote-1"> + <!-- Note --></a> + </p> + <p class="foot"> + 1 (<a href="#linknoteref-1">return</a>)<br /> [ And as I conceive with very + good reason; but if any objector urges that we cannot prove that they have + been produced by artificial or natural selection, the objection must be + admitted— ultrasceptical as it is. But in science, scepticism is a + duty.] + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of A Critical Examination Of The Position +Of Mr. Darwin's Work, "On The Origin Of Species," In Relation To The Complete Theory Of The Causes Of The Phenomena Of Organic Nature, by Thomas H. Huxley + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES *** + +***** This file should be named 2926-h.htm or 2926-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/2/9/2/2926/ + +Produced by Amy E. Zelmer, and David Widger + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + </body> +</html> |