summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/2927-h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:20:07 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:20:07 -0700
commit03db3d311bfad1348cdf949610e68b5fbb58c067 (patch)
tree3c7b42830af2e06a704b45651c3ac7cdd0a5a105 /2927-h
initial commit of ebook 2927HEADmain
Diffstat (limited to '2927-h')
-rw-r--r--2927-h/2927-h.htm1005
1 files changed, 1005 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2927-h/2927-h.htm b/2927-h/2927-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5490973
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2927-h/2927-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,1005 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
+<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Darwinian Hypothesis, by Thomas H. Huxley</title>
+
+<style type="text/css">
+
+body { margin-left: 20%;
+ margin-right: 20%;
+ text-align: justify; }
+
+h1, h2, h3, h4, h5 {text-align: center; font-style: normal; font-weight:
+normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-top: .5em; margin-bottom: .5em;}
+
+h1 {font-size: 300%;
+ margin-top: 0.6em;
+ margin-bottom: 0.6em;
+ letter-spacing: 0.12em;
+ word-spacing: 0.2em;
+ text-indent: 0em;}
+h2 {font-size: 150%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 1em;}
+h3 {font-size: 130%; margin-top: 1em;}
+h4 {font-size: 120%;}
+h5 {font-size: 110%;}
+
+hr {width: 80%; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 2em;}
+
+p {text-indent: 1em;
+ margin-top: 0.25em;
+ margin-bottom: 0.25em; }
+
+p.letter {text-indent: 0%;
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+ margin-top: 1em;
+ margin-bottom: 1em; }
+
+p.noindent {text-indent: 0% }
+
+p.center {text-align: center;
+ text-indent: 0em;
+ margin-top: 1em;
+ margin-bottom: 1em; }
+
+p.footnote {font-size: 90%;
+ text-indent: 0%;
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+ margin-top: 1em;
+ margin-bottom: 1em; }
+
+sup { vertical-align: top; font-size: 0.6em; }
+
+a:link {color:blue; text-decoration:none}
+a:visited {color:blue; text-decoration:none}
+a:hover {color:red}
+
+</style>
+
+</head>
+
+<body>
+
+<pre>
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Darwinian Hypothesis, by Thomas H. Huxley
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
+other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
+whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
+the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
+www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
+to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
+
+Title: The Darwinian Hypothesis
+
+Author: Thomas H. Huxley
+
+Release Date: November, 2001 [Etext #2927]
+[Most recently updated: October 30, 2020]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DARWINIAN HYPOTHESIS ***
+
+
+
+
+This eBook was converted to HTML, with additional editing, by Jose Menendez
+from the text edition produced by Amy E. Zelmer.
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+<h1>The Darwinian Hypothesis<a href="#fn-1" name="fnref-1" id="fnref-1"><sup>*</sup></a></h1>
+
+<h2>by Thomas H. Huxley</h2>
+
+<hr />
+
+<p class="center">
+<b>DARWIN ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES.</b>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+<big><big>T</big></big>HERE is a growing immensity in the speculations of
+science to which no human thing or thought at this day is comparable. Apart
+from the results which science brings us home and securely harvests, there is
+an expansive force and latitude in its tentative efforts, which lifts us out of
+ourselves and transfigures our mortality. We may have a preference for moral
+themes, like the Homeric sage, who had seen and known much:&mdash;
+</p>
+
+<p class="letter">
+&ldquo;Cities of men<br />
+And manners, climates, councils, governments&rdquo;;
+</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">
+yet we must end by confession that
+</p>
+
+<p class="letter">
+&ldquo;The windy ways of men<br />
+Are but dust which rises up<br />
+And is lightly laid again,&rdquo;
+</p>
+
+<p class="noindent">
+in comparison with the work of nature, to which science testifies, but which
+has no boundaries in time or space to which science can approximate.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+There is something altogether out of the reach of science, and yet the compass
+of science is practically illimitable. Hence it is that from time to time we
+are startled and perplexed by theories which have no parallel in the contracted
+moral world; for the generalizations of science sweep on in ever-widening
+circles, and more aspiring flights, through a limitless creation. While
+astronomy, with its telescope, ranges beyond the known stars, and physiology,
+with its microscope, is subdividing infinite minutiae, we may expect that our
+historic centuries may be treated as inadequate counters in the history of the
+planet on which we are placed. We must expect new conceptions of the nature and
+relations of its denizens, as science acquires the materials for fresh
+generalizations; nor have we occasion for alarms if a highly advanced
+knowledge, like that of the eminent Naturalist before us, confronts us with an
+hypothesis as vast as it is novel. This hypothesis may or may not be
+sustainable hereafter; it may give way to something else, and higher science
+may reverse what science has here built up with so much skill and patience, but
+its sufficiency must be tried by the tests of science alone, if we are to
+maintain our position as the heirs of Bacon and the acquitters of Galileo. We
+must weigh this hypothesis strictly in the controversy which is coming, by the
+only tests which are appropriate, and by no others whatsoever.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The hypothesis to which we point, and of which the present work of Mr. Darwin
+is but the preliminary outline, may be stated in his own language as
+follows:&mdash;&ldquo;Species originated by means of natural selection, or
+through the preservation of the favoured races in the struggle for life.&rdquo;
+To render this thesis intelligible, it is necessary to interpret its terms. In
+the first place, what is a species? The question is a simple one, but the right
+answer to it is hard to find, even if we appeal to those who should know most
+about it. It is all those animals or plants which have descended from a single
+pair of parents; it is the smallest distinctly definable group of living
+organisms; it is an eternal and immutable entity; it is a mere abstraction of
+the human intellect having no existence in nature. Such are a few of the
+significations attached to this simple word which may be culled from
+authoritative sources; and if, leaving terms and theoretical subtleties aside,
+we turn to facts and endeavour to gather a meaning for ourselves, by studying
+the things to which, in practice, the name of species is applied, it profits us
+little. For practice varies as much as theory. Let the botanist or the
+zoologist examine and describe the productions of a country, and one will
+pretty certainly disagree with the other as to the number, limits, and
+definitions of the species into which he groups the very same things. In these
+islands, we are in the habit of regarding mankind as of one species, but a
+fortnight&rsquo;s steam will land us in a country where divines and savants,
+for once in agreement, vie with one another in loudness of assertion, if not in
+cogency of proof, that men are of different species; and, more particularly,
+that the species negro is so distinct from our own that the Ten Commandments
+have actually no reference to him. Even in the calm region of entomology,
+where, if anywhere in this sinful world, passion and prejudice should fail to
+stir the mind, one learned coleopterist will fill ten attractive volumes with
+descriptions of species of beetles, nine-tenths of which are immediately
+declared by his brother beetle-mongers to be no species at all.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The truth is that the number of distinguishable living creatures almost
+surpasses imagination. At least a hundred thousand such kinds of insects alone
+have been described and may be identified in collections, and the number of
+separable kinds of living things is underestimated at half a million. Seeing
+that most of these obvious kinds have their accidental varieties, and that they
+often shade into others by imperceptible degrees, it may well be imagined that
+the task of distinguishing between what is permanent and what fleeting, what is
+a species and what a mere variety, is sufficiently formidable.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But is it not possible to apply a test whereby a true species may be known from
+a mere variety? Is there no criterion of species? Great authorities affirm that
+there is&mdash;that the unions of members of the same species are always
+fertile, while those of distinct species are either sterile, or their
+offspring, called hybrids, are so. It is affirmed not only that this is an
+experimental fact, but that it is a provision for the preservation of the
+purity of species. Such a criterion as this would be invaluable; but,
+unfortunately, not only is it not obvious how to apply it in the great majority
+of cases in which its aid is needed, but its general validity is stoutly
+denied. The Hon. and Rev. Mr. Herbert, a most trustworthy authority, not only
+asserts as the result of his own observations and experiments that many hybrids
+are quite as fertile as the parent species, but he goes so far as to assert
+that the particular plant <i>Crinum capense</i> is much more fertile when
+crossed by a distinct species than when fertilised by its proper pollen! On the
+other hand, the famous Gaertner, though he took the greatest pains to cross the
+primrose and the cowslip, succeeded only once or twice in several years; and
+yet it is a well-established fact that the primrose and the cowslip are only
+varieties of the same kind of plant. Again, such cases as the following are
+well established. The female of species A, if crossed with the male of species
+B, is fertile; but, if the female of B is crossed with the male of A, she
+remains barren. Facts of this kind destroy the value of the supposed criterion.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+If, weary of the endless difficulties involved in the determination of species,
+the investigator, contenting himself with the rough practical distinction of
+separable kinds, endeavours to study them as they occur in nature&mdash;to
+ascertain their relations to the conditions which surround them, their mutual
+harmonies and discordances of structure, the bond of union of their parts and
+their past history, he finds himself, according to the received notions, in a
+mighty maze, and with, at most, the dimmest adumbration of a plan. If he starts
+with any one clear conviction, it is that every part of a living creature is
+cunningly adapted to some special use in its life. Has not his Paley told him
+that that seemingly useless organ, the spleen, is beautifully adjusted as so
+much packing between the other organs? And yet, at the outset of his studies,
+he finds that no adaptive reason whatsoever can be given for one-half of the
+peculiarities of vegetable structure; he also discovers rudimentary teeth,
+which are never used, in the gums of the young calf and in those of the foetal
+whale; insects which never bite have rudimental jaws, and others which never
+fly have rudimental wings; naturally blind creatures have rudimental eyes; and
+the halt have rudimentary limbs. So, again, no animal or plant puts on its
+perfect form at once, but all have to start from the same point, however
+various the course which each has to pursue. Not only men and horses, and cats
+and dogs, lobsters and beetles, periwinkles and mussels, but even the very
+sponges and animalcules commence their existence under forms which are
+essentially undistinguishable; and this is true of all the infinite variety of
+plants. Nay, more, all living beings march side by side along the high road of
+development, and separate the later the more like they are; like people leaving
+church, who all go down the aisle, but having reached the door some turn into
+the parsonage, others go down the village, and others part only in the next
+parish. A man in his development runs for a little while parallel with, though
+never passing through, the form of the meanest worm, then travels for a space
+beside the fish, then journeys along with the bird and the reptile for his
+fellow travellers; and only at last, after a brief companionship with the
+highest of the four-footed and four-handed world, rises into the dignity of
+pure manhood. No competent thinker of the present day dreams of explaining
+these indubitable facts by the notion of the existence of unknown and
+undiscoverable adaptations to purpose. And we would remind those who, ignorant
+of the facts, must be moved by authority, that no one has asserted the
+incompetence of the doctrine of final causes, in its application to physiology
+and anatomy, more strongly than our own eminent anatomist, Professor Owen, who,
+speaking of such cases, says (<i>On the Nature of Limbs</i>, pp. 39, 40):
+&ldquo;I think it will be obvious that the principle of final adaptations fails
+to satisfy all the conditions of the problem.&rdquo;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But, if the doctrine of final causes will not help us to comprehend the
+anomalies of living structure, the principle of adaptation must surely lead us
+to understand why certain living beings are found in certain regions of the
+world and not in others. The palm, as we know, will not grow in our climate,
+nor the oak in Greenland. The white bear cannot live where the tiger thrives,
+nor <i>vice versa</i>, and the more the natural habits of animal and vegetable
+species are examined, the more do they seem, on the whole, limited to
+particular provinces. But when we look into the facts established by the study
+of the geographical distribution of animals and plants it seems utterly
+hopeless to attempt to understand the strange and apparently capricious
+relations which they exhibit. One would be inclined to suppose <i>a priori</i>
+that every country must be naturally peopled by those animals that are fittest
+to live and thrive in it. And yet how, on this hypothesis, are we to account
+for the absence of cattle in the Pampas of South America, when those parts of
+the New World were discovered? It is not that they were unfit for cattle, for
+millions of cattle now run wild there; and the like holds good of Australia and
+New Zealand. It is a curious circumstance, in fact, that the animals and plants
+of the Northern Hemisphere are not only as well adapted to live in the Southern
+Hemisphere as its own autochthones, but are in many cases absolutely better
+adapted, and so overrun and extirpate the aborigines. Clearly, therefore, the
+species which naturally inhabit a country are not necessarily the best adapted
+to its climate and other conditions. The inhabitants of islands are often
+distinct from any other known species of animal or plants (witness our recent
+examples from the work of Sir Emerson Tennent, on Ceylon), and yet they have
+almost always a sort of general family resemblance to the animals and plants of
+the nearest mainland. On the other hand, there is hardly a species of fish,
+shell, or crab common to the opposite sides of the narrow isthmus of Panama.
+Wherever we look, then, living nature offers us riddles of difficult solution,
+if we suppose that what we see is all that can be known of it.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But our knowledge of life is not confined to the existing world. Whatever their
+minor differences, geologists are agreed as to the vast thickness of the
+accumulated strata which compose the visible part of our earth, and the
+inconceivable immensity of the time of whose lapse they are the imperfect, but
+the only accessible witnesses. Now, throughout the greater part of this long
+series of stratified rocks are scattered, sometimes very abundantly, multitudes
+of organic remains, the fossilized exuviae of animals and plants which lived
+and died while the mud of which the rocks are formed was yet soft ooze, and
+could receive and bury them. It would be a great error to suppose that these
+organic remains were fragmentary relics. Our museums exhibit fossil shells of
+immeasurable antiquity, as perfect as the day they were formed, whole skeletons
+without a limb disturbed&mdash;nay, the changed flesh, the developing embryos,
+and even the very footsteps of primeval organisms. Thus the naturalist finds in
+the bowels of the earth species as well defined as, and in some groups of
+animals more numerous than, those that breathe the upper air. But, singularly
+enough, the majority of these entombed species are wholly distinct from those
+that now live. Nor is this unlikeness without its rule and order. As a broad
+fact, the further we go back in time the less the buried species are like
+existing forms; and the further apart the sets of extinct creatures are the
+less they are like one another. In other words, there has been a regular
+succession of living beings, each younger set being in a very broad and general
+sense somewhat more like those which now live.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It was once supposed that this succession had been the result of vast
+successive catastrophes, destructions, and re-creations <i>en masse</i>; but
+catastrophes are now almost eliminated from geological, or at least
+palaeontological speculation; and it is admitted on all hands that the seeming
+breaks in the chain of being are not absolute, but only relative to our
+imperfect knowledge; that species have replaced species, not in assemblages,
+but one by one; and that, if it were possible to have all the phenomena of the
+past presented to us, the convenient epochs and formations of the geologist,
+though having a certain distinctness, would fade into one another with limits
+as undefinable as those of the distinct and yet separable colours of the solar
+spectrum.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Such is a brief summary of the main truths which have been established
+concerning species. Are these truths ultimate and irresolvable facts, or are
+their complexities and perplexities the mere expressions of a higher law?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+A large number of persons practically assume the former position to be correct.
+They believe that the writer of the Pentateuch was empowered and commissioned
+to teach us scientific as well as other truth, that the account we find there
+of the creation of living things is simply and literally correct, and that
+anything which seems to contradict it is, by the nature of the case, false.
+All the phenomena which have been detailed are, on this view, the immediate
+product of a creative fiat and consequently are out of the domain of science
+altogether.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Whether this view prove ultimately to be true or false, it is, at any rate, not
+at present supported by what is commonly regarded as logical proof, even if it
+be capable of discussion by reason; and hence we consider ourselves at liberty
+to pass it by, and to turn to those views which profess to rest on a scientific
+basis only, and therefore admit of being argued to their consequences. And we
+do this with the less hesitation as it so happens that those persons who are
+practically conversant with the facts of the case (plainly a considerable
+advantage) have always thought fit to range themselves under the latter
+category.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The majority of these competent persons have up to the present time maintained
+two positions,&mdash;the first, that every species is, within certain defined
+or definable limits, fixed and incapable of modification; the second, that
+every species was originally produced by a distinct creative act. The second
+position is obviously incapable of proof or disproof, the direct operations of
+the Creator not being subjects of science; and it must therefore be regarded as
+a corollary from the first, the truth or falsehood of which is a matter of
+evidence. Most persons imagine that the arguments in favour of it are
+overwhelming; but to some few minds, and these, it must be confessed,
+intellects of no small power and grasp of knowledge, they have not brought
+conviction. Among these minds, that of the famous naturalist Lamarck, who
+possessed a greater acquaintance with the lower forms of life than any man of
+his day, Cuvier not excepted, and was a good botanist to boot, occupies a
+prominent place.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Two facts appear to have strongly affected the course of thought of this
+remarkable man&mdash;the one, that finer or stronger links of affinity connect
+all living beings with one another, and that thus the highest creature grades
+by multitudinous steps into the lowest; the other, that an organ may be
+developed in particular directions by exerting itself in particular ways, and
+that modifications once induced may be transmitted and become hereditary.
+Putting these facts together, Lamarck endeavoured to account for the first by
+the operation of the second. Place an animal in new circumstances, says he, and
+its needs will be altered; the new needs will create new desires, and the
+attempt to gratify such desires will result in an appropriate modification of
+the organs exerted. Make a man a blacksmith, and his brachial muscles will
+develop in accordance with the demands made upon them, and in like manner, says
+Lamarck, &ldquo;the efforts of some short-necked bird to catch fish without
+wetting himself have, with time and perseverance, given rise to all our herons
+and long-necked waders.&rdquo;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The Lamarckian hypothesis has long since been justly condemned, and it is the
+established practice for every tyro to raise his heel against the carcass of
+the dead lion. But it is rarely either wise or instructive to treat even the
+errors of a really great man with mere ridicule, and in the present case the
+logical form of the doctrine stands on a very different footing from its
+substance.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+If species have really arisen by the operation of natural conditions, we ought
+to be able to find those conditions now at work; we ought to be able to
+discover in nature some power adequate to modify any given kind of animal or
+plant in such a manner as to give rise to another kind, which would be admitted
+by naturalists as a distinct species. Lamarck imagined that he had discovered
+this <i>vera causa</i> in the admitted facts that some organs may be modified
+by exercise; and that modifications, once produced, are capable of hereditary
+transmission. It does not seem to have occurred to him to inquire whether there
+is any reason to believe that there are any limits to the amount of
+modification producible, or to ask how long an animal is likely to endeavour to
+gratify an impossible desire. The bird, in our example, would surely have
+renounced fish dinners long before it had produced the least effect on leg or
+neck.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Since Lamarck&rsquo;s time, almost all competent naturalists have left
+speculations on the origin of species to such dreamers as the author of the
+&ldquo;Vestiges,&rdquo; by whose well-intentioned efforts the Lamarckian theory
+received its final condemnation in the minds of all sound thinkers.
+Notwithstanding this silence, however, the transmutation theory, as it has been
+called, has been a &ldquo;skeleton in the closet&rdquo; to many an honest
+zoologist and botanist who had a soul above the mere naming of dried plants and
+skins. Surely, has such an one thought, nature is a mighty and consistent
+whole, and the providential order established in the world of life must, if we
+could only see it rightly, be consistent with that dominant over the multiform
+shapes of brute matter. But what is the history of astronomy, of all the
+branches of physics, of chemistry, of medicine, but a narration of the steps by
+which the human mind has been compelled, often sorely against its will, to
+recognize the operation of secondary causes in events where ignorance beheld an
+immediate intervention of a higher power? And when we know that living things
+are formed of the same elements as the inorganic world, that they act and react
+upon it, bound by a thousand ties of natural piety, is it probable, nay is it
+possible, that they, and they alone, should have no order in their seeming
+disorder, no unity in their seeming multiplicity, should suffer no explanation
+by the discovery of some central and sublime law of mutual connexion?
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Questions of this kind have assuredly often arisen, but it might have been long
+before they received such expression as would have commanded the respect and
+attention of the scientific world, had it not been for the publication of the
+work which prompted this article. Its author, Mr. Darwin, inheritor of a once
+celebrated name, won his spurs in science when most of those now distinguished
+were young men, and has for the last 20 years held a place in the front ranks
+of British philosophers. After a circumnavigatory voyage, undertaken solely for
+the love of his science, Mr. Darwin published a series of researches which at
+once arrested the attention of naturalists and geologists; his generalizations
+have since received ample confirmation, and now command universal assent, nor
+is it questionable that they have had the most important influence on the
+progress of science. More recently Mr. Darwin, with a versatility which is
+among the rarest of gifts, turned his attention to a most difficult question of
+zoology and minute anatomy; and no living naturalist and anatomist has
+published a better monograph than that which resulted from his labours. Such a
+man, at all events, has not entered the sanctuary with unwashed hands, and when
+he lays before us the results of 20 years&rsquo; investigation and reflection
+we must listen even though we be disposed to strike. But, in reading his work
+it must be confessed that the attention which might at first be dutifully, soon
+becomes willingly, given, so clear is the author&rsquo;s thought, so outspoken
+his conviction, so honest and fair the candid expression of his doubts. Those
+who would judge the book must read it; we shall endeavour only to make its line
+of argument and its philosophical position intelligible to the general reader
+in our own way.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The Baker-street Bazaar has just been exhibiting its familiar annual spectacle.
+Straight-backed, small-headed, big-barrelled oxen, as dissimilar from any wild
+species as can well be imagined, contended for attention and praise with sheep
+of half-a-dozen different breeds and styes of bloated preposterous pigs, no
+more like a wild boar or sow than a city alderman is like an ourang-outang. The
+cattle show has been, and perhaps may again be, succeeded by a poultry show, of
+whose crowing and clucking prodigies it can only be certainly predicated that
+they will be very unlike the aboriginal <i>Phasianus gallus</i>. If the seeker
+after animal anomalies is not satisfied, a turn or two in Seven Dials will
+convince him that the breeds of pigeons are quite as extraordinary and unlike
+one another and their parent stock, while the Horticultural Society will
+provide him with any number of corresponding vegetable aberrations from
+nature&rsquo;s types. He will learn with no little surprise, too, in the course
+of his travels, that the proprietors and producers of these animal and
+vegetable anomalies regard them as distinct species, with a firm belief, the
+strength of which is exactly proportioned to their ignorance of scientific
+biology, and which is the more remarkable as they are all proud of their skill
+in <i>originating</i> such &ldquo;species.&rdquo;
+</p>
+
+<p>
+On careful inquiry it is found that all these, and the many other artificial
+breeds or races of animals and plants, have been produced by one method. The
+breeder&mdash;and a skilful one must be a person of much sagacity and natural
+or acquired perceptive faculty&mdash;notes some slight difference, arising he
+knows not how, in some individuals of his stock. If he wish to perpetuate the
+difference, to form a breed with the peculiarity in question strongly marked,
+he selects such male and female individuals as exhibit the desired character,
+and breeds from them. Their offspring are then carefully examined, and those
+which exhibit the peculiarity the most distinctly are selected for breeding,
+and this operation is repeated until the desired amount of divergence from the
+primitive stock is reached. It is then found that by continuing the process of
+selection&mdash;always breeding, that is, from well-marked forms, and allowing
+no impure crosses to interfere,&mdash;a race may be formed, the tendency of
+which to reproduce itself is exceedingly strong; nor is the limit to the amount
+of divergence which may be thus produced known, but one thing is certain, that,
+if certain breeds of dogs, or of pigeons, or of horses, were known only in a
+fossil state, no naturalist would hesitate in regarding them as distinct
+species.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But, in all these cases we have <i>human interference</i>. Without the breeder
+there would be no selection, and without the selection no race. Before
+admitting the possibility of natural species having originated in any similar
+way, it must be proved that there is in nature some power which takes the place
+of man, and performs a selection <i>sua sponte</i>. It is the claim of Mr.
+Darwin that he professes to have discovered the existence and the <i>modus
+operandi</i> of this natural selection, as he terms it; and, if he be right,
+the process is perfectly simple and comprehensible, and irresistibly deducible
+from very familiar but well nigh forgotten facts.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Who, for instance, has duly reflected upon all the consequences of the
+marvellous struggle for existence which is daily and hourly going on among
+living beings? Not only does every animal live at the expense of some other
+animal or plant, but the very plants are at war. The ground is full of seeds
+that cannot rise into seedlings; the seedlings rob one another of air, light
+and water, the strongest robber winning the day, and extinguishing his
+competitors. Year after year, the wild animals with which man never interferes
+are, on the average, neither more nor less numerous than they were; and yet we
+know that the annual produce of every pair is from one to perhaps a million
+young,&mdash;so that it is mathematically certain that, on the average, as many
+are killed by natural causes as are born every year, and those only escape
+which happen to be a little better fitted to resist destruction than those
+which die. The individuals of a species are like the crew of a foundered ship,
+and none but good swimmers have a chance of reaching the land.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Such being unquestionably the necessary conditions under which living creatures
+exist, Mr. Darwin discovers in them the instrument of natural selection.
+Suppose that in the midst of this incessant competition some individuals of a
+species (A) present accidental variations which happen to fit them a little
+better than their fellows for the struggle in which they are engaged, then the
+chances are in favour, not only of these individuals being better nourished
+than the others, but of their predominating over their fellows in other ways,
+and of having a better chance of leaving offspring, which will of course tend
+to reproduce the peculiarities of their parents. Their offspring will, by a
+parity of reasoning, tend to predominate over their contemporaries, and there
+being (suppose) no room for more than one species such as A, the weaker variety
+will eventually be destroyed by the new destructive influence which is thrown
+into the scale, and the stronger will take its place. Surrounding conditions
+remaining unchanged, the new variety (which we may call B)&mdash;supposed, for
+argument&rsquo;s sake, to be the best adapted for these conditions which can be
+got out of the original stock&mdash;will remain unchanged, all accidental
+deviations from the type becoming at once extinguished, as less fit for their
+post than B itself. The tendency of B to persist will grow with its persistence
+through successive generations, and it will acquire all the characters of a new
+species.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But, on the other hand, if the conditions of life change in any degree, however
+slight, B may no longer be that form which is best adapted to withstand their
+destructive, and profit by their sustaining, influence; in which case if it
+should give rise to a more competent variety (C), this will take its place and
+become a new species; and thus, by <i>natural selection</i>, the species B and
+C will be successively derived from A.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+That this most ingenious hypothesis enables us to give a reason for many
+apparent anomalies in the distribution of living beings in time and space, and
+that it is not contradicted by the main phenomena of life and organization
+appear to us to be unquestionable; and so far it must be admitted to have an
+immense advantage over any of its predecessors. But it is quite another matter
+to affirm absolutely either the truth or falsehood of Mr. Darwin&rsquo;s views
+at the present stage of the inquiry. Goethe has an excellent aphorism defining
+that state of mind which he calls <i>Thätige Skepsis</i>&mdash;active doubt.
+It is doubt which so loves truth that it neither dares rest in doubting, nor
+extinguish itself by unjustified belief; and we commend this state of mind to
+students of species, with respect to Mr. Darwin&rsquo;s or any other
+hypothesis, as to their origin. The combined investigations of another 20 years
+may, perhaps, enable naturalists to say whether the modifying causes and the
+selective power, which Mr. Darwin has satisfactorily shown to exist in nature,
+are competent to produce all the effects he ascribes to them, or whether, on
+the other hand, he has been led to over-estimate the value of his principle of
+natural selection, as greatly as Lamarck overestimated his <i>vera causa</i> of
+modification by exercise.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+But there is, at all events, one advantage possessed by the more recent writer
+over his predecessor. Mr. Darwin abhors mere speculation as nature abhors a
+vacuum. He is as greedy of cases and precedents as any constitutional lawyer,
+and all the principles he lays down are capable of being brought to the test of
+observation and experiment. The path he bids us follow professes to be, not a
+mere airy track, fabricated of ideal cobwebs, but a solid and broad bridge of
+facts. If it be so, it will carry us safely over many a chasm in our knowledge,
+and lead us to a region free from the snares of those fascinating but barren
+Virgins, the Final Causes, against whom a high authority has so justly warned
+us. &ldquo;My sons, dig in the vineyard,&rdquo; were the last words of the old
+man in the fable; and, though the sons found no treasure, they made their
+fortunes by the grapes.
+</p>
+
+<p class="footnote">
+<a name="fn-1" id="fn-1"></a> <a href="#fnref-1">*</a>
+<i>Times</i>, December 26th, 1850.
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Darwinian Hypothesis, by Thomas H. Huxley
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DARWINIAN HYPOTHESIS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 2927-h.htm or 2927-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/2/9/2/2927/
+
+This eBook was converted to HTML, with additional editing, by Jose Menendez
+from the text edition produced by Amy E. Zelmer.
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
+be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
+law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
+so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
+States without permission and without paying copyright
+royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
+of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
+concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
+and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
+specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
+eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
+for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
+performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
+away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
+not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
+trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
+
+START: FULL LICENSE
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
+Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
+www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
+destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
+possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
+Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
+by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
+person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
+1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
+agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
+Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
+of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
+works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
+States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
+United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
+claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
+displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
+all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
+that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
+free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
+works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
+Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
+comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
+same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
+you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
+in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
+check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
+agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
+distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
+other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
+representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
+country outside the United States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
+immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
+prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
+on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
+performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
+
+ This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
+ most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
+ restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
+ under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
+ eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
+ United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
+ are located before using this ebook.
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
+derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
+contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
+copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
+the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
+redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
+either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
+obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
+trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
+additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
+will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
+posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
+beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
+any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
+to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
+other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
+version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
+(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
+to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
+of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
+Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
+full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+provided that
+
+* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
+ to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
+ agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
+ Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
+ within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
+ legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
+ payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
+ Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
+ Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
+ Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
+ copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
+ all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
+ works.
+
+* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
+ any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
+ receipt of the work.
+
+* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
+are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
+from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
+Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
+Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
+contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
+or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
+intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
+other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
+cannot be read by your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
+with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
+with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
+lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
+or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
+opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
+the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
+without further opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
+OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
+damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
+violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
+agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
+limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
+unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
+remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
+accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
+production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
+including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
+the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
+or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
+additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
+Defect you cause.
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
+computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
+exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
+from people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
+generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
+Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
+www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
+U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
+mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
+volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
+locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
+Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
+date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
+official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
+DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
+state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
+donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
+freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
+distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
+volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
+the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
+necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
+edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
+facility: www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+
+</html>
+
+