summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/2927-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '2927-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--2927-0.txt902
1 files changed, 902 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2927-0.txt b/2927-0.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5133016
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2927-0.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,902 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Darwinian Hypothesis, by Thomas H. Huxley
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
+other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
+whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
+the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
+www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
+to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
+
+Title: The Darwinian Hypothesis
+
+Author: Thomas H. Huxley
+
+Release Date: November, 2001 [Etext #2927]
+[Most recently updated: October 30, 2020]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: UTF-8
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DARWINIAN HYPOTHESIS ***
+
+
+
+
+This eBook was converted to HTML, with additional editing, by Jose Menendez
+from the text edition produced by Amy E. Zelmer.
+
+
+
+
+The Darwinian Hypothesis*
+
+by Thomas H. Huxley
+
+
+
+DARWIN ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES.
+
+
+THERE is a growing immensity in the speculations of science to which no
+human thing or thought at this day is comparable. Apart from the
+results which science brings us home and securely harvests, there is an
+expansive force and latitude in its tentative efforts, which lifts us
+out of ourselves and transfigures our mortality. We may have a
+preference for moral themes, like the Homeric sage, who had seen and
+known much:—
+
+ “Cities of men
+ And manners, climates, councils, governments”;
+
+yet we must end by confession that
+
+ “The windy ways of men
+ Are but dust which rises up
+ And is lightly laid again,”
+
+in comparison with the work of nature, to which science testifies, but
+which has no boundaries in time or space to which science can
+approximate.
+
+There is something altogether out of the reach of science, and yet the
+compass of science is practically illimitable. Hence it is that from
+time to time we are startled and perplexed by theories which have no
+parallel in the contracted moral world; for the generalizations of
+science sweep on in ever-widening circles, and more aspiring flights,
+through a limitless creation. While astronomy, with its telescope,
+ranges beyond the known stars, and physiology, with its microscope, is
+subdividing infinite minutiae, we may expect that our historic
+centuries may be treated as inadequate counters in the history of the
+planet on which we are placed. We must expect new conceptions of the
+nature and relations of its denizens, as science acquires the materials
+for fresh generalizations; nor have we occasion for alarms if a highly
+advanced knowledge, like that of the eminent Naturalist before us,
+confronts us with an hypothesis as vast as it is novel. This hypothesis
+may or may not be sustainable hereafter; it may give way to something
+else, and higher science may reverse what science has here built up
+with so much skill and patience, but its sufficiency must be tried by
+the tests of science alone, if we are to maintain our position as the
+heirs of Bacon and the acquitters of Galileo. We must weigh this
+hypothesis strictly in the controversy which is coming, by the only
+tests which are appropriate, and by no others whatsoever.
+
+The hypothesis to which we point, and of which the present work of Mr.
+Darwin is but the preliminary outline, may be stated in his own
+language as follows:—“Species originated by means of natural selection,
+or through the preservation of the favoured races in the struggle for
+life.” To render this thesis intelligible, it is necessary to interpret
+its terms. In the first place, what is a species? The question is a
+simple one, but the right answer to it is hard to find, even if we
+appeal to those who should know most about it. It is all those animals
+or plants which have descended from a single pair of parents; it is the
+smallest distinctly definable group of living organisms; it is an
+eternal and immutable entity; it is a mere abstraction of the human
+intellect having no existence in nature. Such are a few of the
+significations attached to this simple word which may be culled from
+authoritative sources; and if, leaving terms and theoretical subtleties
+aside, we turn to facts and endeavour to gather a meaning for
+ourselves, by studying the things to which, in practice, the name of
+species is applied, it profits us little. For practice varies as much
+as theory. Let the botanist or the zoologist examine and describe the
+productions of a country, and one will pretty certainly disagree with
+the other as to the number, limits, and definitions of the species into
+which he groups the very same things. In these islands, we are in the
+habit of regarding mankind as of one species, but a fortnight’s steam
+will land us in a country where divines and savants, for once in
+agreement, vie with one another in loudness of assertion, if not in
+cogency of proof, that men are of different species; and, more
+particularly, that the species negro is so distinct from our own that
+the Ten Commandments have actually no reference to him. Even in the
+calm region of entomology, where, if anywhere in this sinful world,
+passion and prejudice should fail to stir the mind, one learned
+coleopterist will fill ten attractive volumes with descriptions of
+species of beetles, nine-tenths of which are immediately declared by
+his brother beetle-mongers to be no species at all.
+
+The truth is that the number of distinguishable living creatures almost
+surpasses imagination. At least a hundred thousand such kinds of
+insects alone have been described and may be identified in collections,
+and the number of separable kinds of living things is underestimated at
+half a million. Seeing that most of these obvious kinds have their
+accidental varieties, and that they often shade into others by
+imperceptible degrees, it may well be imagined that the task of
+distinguishing between what is permanent and what fleeting, what is a
+species and what a mere variety, is sufficiently formidable.
+
+But is it not possible to apply a test whereby a true species may be
+known from a mere variety? Is there no criterion of species? Great
+authorities affirm that there is—that the unions of members of the same
+species are always fertile, while those of distinct species are either
+sterile, or their offspring, called hybrids, are so. It is affirmed not
+only that this is an experimental fact, but that it is a provision for
+the preservation of the purity of species. Such a criterion as this
+would be invaluable; but, unfortunately, not only is it not obvious how
+to apply it in the great majority of cases in which its aid is needed,
+but its general validity is stoutly denied. The Hon. and Rev. Mr.
+Herbert, a most trustworthy authority, not only asserts as the result
+of his own observations and experiments that many hybrids are quite as
+fertile as the parent species, but he goes so far as to assert that the
+particular plant _Crinum capense_ is much more fertile when crossed by
+a distinct species than when fertilised by its proper pollen! On the
+other hand, the famous Gaertner, though he took the greatest pains to
+cross the primrose and the cowslip, succeeded only once or twice in
+several years; and yet it is a well-established fact that the primrose
+and the cowslip are only varieties of the same kind of plant. Again,
+such cases as the following are well established. The female of species
+A, if crossed with the male of species B, is fertile; but, if the
+female of B is crossed with the male of A, she remains barren. Facts of
+this kind destroy the value of the supposed criterion.
+
+If, weary of the endless difficulties involved in the determination of
+species, the investigator, contenting himself with the rough practical
+distinction of separable kinds, endeavours to study them as they occur
+in nature—to ascertain their relations to the conditions which surround
+them, their mutual harmonies and discordances of structure, the bond of
+union of their parts and their past history, he finds himself,
+according to the received notions, in a mighty maze, and with, at most,
+the dimmest adumbration of a plan. If he starts with any one clear
+conviction, it is that every part of a living creature is cunningly
+adapted to some special use in its life. Has not his Paley told him
+that that seemingly useless organ, the spleen, is beautifully adjusted
+as so much packing between the other organs? And yet, at the outset of
+his studies, he finds that no adaptive reason whatsoever can be given
+for one-half of the peculiarities of vegetable structure; he also
+discovers rudimentary teeth, which are never used, in the gums of the
+young calf and in those of the foetal whale; insects which never bite
+have rudimental jaws, and others which never fly have rudimental wings;
+naturally blind creatures have rudimental eyes; and the halt have
+rudimentary limbs. So, again, no animal or plant puts on its perfect
+form at once, but all have to start from the same point, however
+various the course which each has to pursue. Not only men and horses,
+and cats and dogs, lobsters and beetles, periwinkles and mussels, but
+even the very sponges and animalcules commence their existence under
+forms which are essentially undistinguishable; and this is true of all
+the infinite variety of plants. Nay, more, all living beings march side
+by side along the high road of development, and separate the later the
+more like they are; like people leaving church, who all go down the
+aisle, but having reached the door some turn into the parsonage, others
+go down the village, and others part only in the next parish. A man in
+his development runs for a little while parallel with, though never
+passing through, the form of the meanest worm, then travels for a space
+beside the fish, then journeys along with the bird and the reptile for
+his fellow travellers; and only at last, after a brief companionship
+with the highest of the four-footed and four-handed world, rises into
+the dignity of pure manhood. No competent thinker of the present day
+dreams of explaining these indubitable facts by the notion of the
+existence of unknown and undiscoverable adaptations to purpose. And we
+would remind those who, ignorant of the facts, must be moved by
+authority, that no one has asserted the incompetence of the doctrine of
+final causes, in its application to physiology and anatomy, more
+strongly than our own eminent anatomist, Professor Owen, who, speaking
+of such cases, says (_On the Nature of Limbs_, pp. 39, 40): “I think it
+will be obvious that the principle of final adaptations fails to
+satisfy all the conditions of the problem.”
+
+But, if the doctrine of final causes will not help us to comprehend the
+anomalies of living structure, the principle of adaptation must surely
+lead us to understand why certain living beings are found in certain
+regions of the world and not in others. The palm, as we know, will not
+grow in our climate, nor the oak in Greenland. The white bear cannot
+live where the tiger thrives, nor _vice versa_, and the more the
+natural habits of animal and vegetable species are examined, the more
+do they seem, on the whole, limited to particular provinces. But when
+we look into the facts established by the study of the geographical
+distribution of animals and plants it seems utterly hopeless to attempt
+to understand the strange and apparently capricious relations which
+they exhibit. One would be inclined to suppose _a priori_ that every
+country must be naturally peopled by those animals that are fittest to
+live and thrive in it. And yet how, on this hypothesis, are we to
+account for the absence of cattle in the Pampas of South America, when
+those parts of the New World were discovered? It is not that they were
+unfit for cattle, for millions of cattle now run wild there; and the
+like holds good of Australia and New Zealand. It is a curious
+circumstance, in fact, that the animals and plants of the Northern
+Hemisphere are not only as well adapted to live in the Southern
+Hemisphere as its own autochthones, but are in many cases absolutely
+better adapted, and so overrun and extirpate the aborigines. Clearly,
+therefore, the species which naturally inhabit a country are not
+necessarily the best adapted to its climate and other conditions. The
+inhabitants of islands are often distinct from any other known species
+of animal or plants (witness our recent examples from the work of Sir
+Emerson Tennent, on Ceylon), and yet they have almost always a sort of
+general family resemblance to the animals and plants of the nearest
+mainland. On the other hand, there is hardly a species of fish, shell,
+or crab common to the opposite sides of the narrow isthmus of Panama.
+Wherever we look, then, living nature offers us riddles of difficult
+solution, if we suppose that what we see is all that can be known of
+it.
+
+But our knowledge of life is not confined to the existing world.
+Whatever their minor differences, geologists are agreed as to the vast
+thickness of the accumulated strata which compose the visible part of
+our earth, and the inconceivable immensity of the time of whose lapse
+they are the imperfect, but the only accessible witnesses. Now,
+throughout the greater part of this long series of stratified rocks are
+scattered, sometimes very abundantly, multitudes of organic remains,
+the fossilized exuviae of animals and plants which lived and died while
+the mud of which the rocks are formed was yet soft ooze, and could
+receive and bury them. It would be a great error to suppose that these
+organic remains were fragmentary relics. Our museums exhibit fossil
+shells of immeasurable antiquity, as perfect as the day they were
+formed, whole skeletons without a limb disturbed—nay, the changed
+flesh, the developing embryos, and even the very footsteps of primeval
+organisms. Thus the naturalist finds in the bowels of the earth species
+as well defined as, and in some groups of animals more numerous than,
+those that breathe the upper air. But, singularly enough, the majority
+of these entombed species are wholly distinct from those that now live.
+Nor is this unlikeness without its rule and order. As a broad fact, the
+further we go back in time the less the buried species are like
+existing forms; and the further apart the sets of extinct creatures are
+the less they are like one another. In other words, there has been a
+regular succession of living beings, each younger set being in a very
+broad and general sense somewhat more like those which now live.
+
+It was once supposed that this succession had been the result of vast
+successive catastrophes, destructions, and re-creations _en masse_; but
+catastrophes are now almost eliminated from geological, or at least
+palaeontological speculation; and it is admitted on all hands that the
+seeming breaks in the chain of being are not absolute, but only
+relative to our imperfect knowledge; that species have replaced
+species, not in assemblages, but one by one; and that, if it were
+possible to have all the phenomena of the past presented to us, the
+convenient epochs and formations of the geologist, though having a
+certain distinctness, would fade into one another with limits as
+undefinable as those of the distinct and yet separable colours of the
+solar spectrum.
+
+Such is a brief summary of the main truths which have been established
+concerning species. Are these truths ultimate and irresolvable facts,
+or are their complexities and perplexities the mere expressions of a
+higher law?
+
+A large number of persons practically assume the former position to be
+correct. They believe that the writer of the Pentateuch was empowered
+and commissioned to teach us scientific as well as other truth, that
+the account we find there of the creation of living things is simply
+and literally correct, and that anything which seems to contradict it
+is, by the nature of the case, false. All the phenomena which have been
+detailed are, on this view, the immediate product of a creative fiat
+and consequently are out of the domain of science altogether.
+
+Whether this view prove ultimately to be true or false, it is, at any
+rate, not at present supported by what is commonly regarded as logical
+proof, even if it be capable of discussion by reason; and hence we
+consider ourselves at liberty to pass it by, and to turn to those views
+which profess to rest on a scientific basis only, and therefore admit
+of being argued to their consequences. And we do this with the less
+hesitation as it so happens that those persons who are practically
+conversant with the facts of the case (plainly a considerable
+advantage) have always thought fit to range themselves under the latter
+category.
+
+The majority of these competent persons have up to the present time
+maintained two positions,—the first, that every species is, within
+certain defined or definable limits, fixed and incapable of
+modification; the second, that every species was originally produced by
+a distinct creative act. The second position is obviously incapable of
+proof or disproof, the direct operations of the Creator not being
+subjects of science; and it must therefore be regarded as a corollary
+from the first, the truth or falsehood of which is a matter of
+evidence. Most persons imagine that the arguments in favour of it are
+overwhelming; but to some few minds, and these, it must be confessed,
+intellects of no small power and grasp of knowledge, they have not
+brought conviction. Among these minds, that of the famous naturalist
+Lamarck, who possessed a greater acquaintance with the lower forms of
+life than any man of his day, Cuvier not excepted, and was a good
+botanist to boot, occupies a prominent place.
+
+Two facts appear to have strongly affected the course of thought of
+this remarkable man—the one, that finer or stronger links of affinity
+connect all living beings with one another, and that thus the highest
+creature grades by multitudinous steps into the lowest; the other, that
+an organ may be developed in particular directions by exerting itself
+in particular ways, and that modifications once induced may be
+transmitted and become hereditary. Putting these facts together,
+Lamarck endeavoured to account for the first by the operation of the
+second. Place an animal in new circumstances, says he, and its needs
+will be altered; the new needs will create new desires, and the attempt
+to gratify such desires will result in an appropriate modification of
+the organs exerted. Make a man a blacksmith, and his brachial muscles
+will develop in accordance with the demands made upon them, and in like
+manner, says Lamarck, “the efforts of some short-necked bird to catch
+fish without wetting himself have, with time and perseverance, given
+rise to all our herons and long-necked waders.”
+
+The Lamarckian hypothesis has long since been justly condemned, and it
+is the established practice for every tyro to raise his heel against
+the carcass of the dead lion. But it is rarely either wise or
+instructive to treat even the errors of a really great man with mere
+ridicule, and in the present case the logical form of the doctrine
+stands on a very different footing from its substance.
+
+If species have really arisen by the operation of natural conditions,
+we ought to be able to find those conditions now at work; we ought to
+be able to discover in nature some power adequate to modify any given
+kind of animal or plant in such a manner as to give rise to another
+kind, which would be admitted by naturalists as a distinct species.
+Lamarck imagined that he had discovered this _vera causa_ in the
+admitted facts that some organs may be modified by exercise; and that
+modifications, once produced, are capable of hereditary transmission.
+It does not seem to have occurred to him to inquire whether there is
+any reason to believe that there are any limits to the amount of
+modification producible, or to ask how long an animal is likely to
+endeavour to gratify an impossible desire. The bird, in our example,
+would surely have renounced fish dinners long before it had produced
+the least effect on leg or neck.
+
+Since Lamarck’s time, almost all competent naturalists have left
+speculations on the origin of species to such dreamers as the author of
+the “Vestiges,” by whose well-intentioned efforts the Lamarckian theory
+received its final condemnation in the minds of all sound thinkers.
+Notwithstanding this silence, however, the transmutation theory, as it
+has been called, has been a “skeleton in the closet” to many an honest
+zoologist and botanist who had a soul above the mere naming of dried
+plants and skins. Surely, has such an one thought, nature is a mighty
+and consistent whole, and the providential order established in the
+world of life must, if we could only see it rightly, be consistent with
+that dominant over the multiform shapes of brute matter. But what is
+the history of astronomy, of all the branches of physics, of chemistry,
+of medicine, but a narration of the steps by which the human mind has
+been compelled, often sorely against its will, to recognize the
+operation of secondary causes in events where ignorance beheld an
+immediate intervention of a higher power? And when we know that living
+things are formed of the same elements as the inorganic world, that
+they act and react upon it, bound by a thousand ties of natural piety,
+is it probable, nay is it possible, that they, and they alone, should
+have no order in their seeming disorder, no unity in their seeming
+multiplicity, should suffer no explanation by the discovery of some
+central and sublime law of mutual connexion?
+
+Questions of this kind have assuredly often arisen, but it might have
+been long before they received such expression as would have commanded
+the respect and attention of the scientific world, had it not been for
+the publication of the work which prompted this article. Its author,
+Mr. Darwin, inheritor of a once celebrated name, won his spurs in
+science when most of those now distinguished were young men, and has
+for the last 20 years held a place in the front ranks of British
+philosophers. After a circumnavigatory voyage, undertaken solely for
+the love of his science, Mr. Darwin published a series of researches
+which at once arrested the attention of naturalists and geologists; his
+generalizations have since received ample confirmation, and now command
+universal assent, nor is it questionable that they have had the most
+important influence on the progress of science. More recently Mr.
+Darwin, with a versatility which is among the rarest of gifts, turned
+his attention to a most difficult question of zoology and minute
+anatomy; and no living naturalist and anatomist has published a better
+monograph than that which resulted from his labours. Such a man, at all
+events, has not entered the sanctuary with unwashed hands, and when he
+lays before us the results of 20 years’ investigation and reflection we
+must listen even though we be disposed to strike. But, in reading his
+work it must be confessed that the attention which might at first be
+dutifully, soon becomes willingly, given, so clear is the author’s
+thought, so outspoken his conviction, so honest and fair the candid
+expression of his doubts. Those who would judge the book must read it;
+we shall endeavour only to make its line of argument and its
+philosophical position intelligible to the general reader in our own
+way.
+
+The Baker-street Bazaar has just been exhibiting its familiar annual
+spectacle. Straight-backed, small-headed, big-barrelled oxen, as
+dissimilar from any wild species as can well be imagined, contended for
+attention and praise with sheep of half-a-dozen different breeds and
+styes of bloated preposterous pigs, no more like a wild boar or sow
+than a city alderman is like an ourang-outang. The cattle show has
+been, and perhaps may again be, succeeded by a poultry show, of whose
+crowing and clucking prodigies it can only be certainly predicated that
+they will be very unlike the aboriginal _Phasianus gallus_. If the
+seeker after animal anomalies is not satisfied, a turn or two in Seven
+Dials will convince him that the breeds of pigeons are quite as
+extraordinary and unlike one another and their parent stock, while the
+Horticultural Society will provide him with any number of corresponding
+vegetable aberrations from nature’s types. He will learn with no little
+surprise, too, in the course of his travels, that the proprietors and
+producers of these animal and vegetable anomalies regard them as
+distinct species, with a firm belief, the strength of which is exactly
+proportioned to their ignorance of scientific biology, and which is the
+more remarkable as they are all proud of their skill in _originating_
+such “species.”
+
+On careful inquiry it is found that all these, and the many other
+artificial breeds or races of animals and plants, have been produced by
+one method. The breeder—and a skilful one must be a person of much
+sagacity and natural or acquired perceptive faculty—notes some slight
+difference, arising he knows not how, in some individuals of his stock.
+If he wish to perpetuate the difference, to form a breed with the
+peculiarity in question strongly marked, he selects such male and
+female individuals as exhibit the desired character, and breeds from
+them. Their offspring are then carefully examined, and those which
+exhibit the peculiarity the most distinctly are selected for breeding,
+and this operation is repeated until the desired amount of divergence
+from the primitive stock is reached. It is then found that by
+continuing the process of selection—always breeding, that is, from
+well-marked forms, and allowing no impure crosses to interfere,—a race
+may be formed, the tendency of which to reproduce itself is exceedingly
+strong; nor is the limit to the amount of divergence which may be thus
+produced known, but one thing is certain, that, if certain breeds of
+dogs, or of pigeons, or of horses, were known only in a fossil state,
+no naturalist would hesitate in regarding them as distinct species.
+
+But, in all these cases we have _human interference_. Without the
+breeder there would be no selection, and without the selection no race.
+Before admitting the possibility of natural species having originated
+in any similar way, it must be proved that there is in nature some
+power which takes the place of man, and performs a selection _sua
+sponte_. It is the claim of Mr. Darwin that he professes to have
+discovered the existence and the _modus operandi_ of this natural
+selection, as he terms it; and, if he be right, the process is
+perfectly simple and comprehensible, and irresistibly deducible from
+very familiar but well nigh forgotten facts.
+
+Who, for instance, has duly reflected upon all the consequences of the
+marvellous struggle for existence which is daily and hourly going on
+among living beings? Not only does every animal live at the expense of
+some other animal or plant, but the very plants are at war. The ground
+is full of seeds that cannot rise into seedlings; the seedlings rob one
+another of air, light and water, the strongest robber winning the day,
+and extinguishing his competitors. Year after year, the wild animals
+with which man never interferes are, on the average, neither more nor
+less numerous than they were; and yet we know that the annual produce
+of every pair is from one to perhaps a million young,—so that it is
+mathematically certain that, on the average, as many are killed by
+natural causes as are born every year, and those only escape which
+happen to be a little better fitted to resist destruction than those
+which die. The individuals of a species are like the crew of a
+foundered ship, and none but good swimmers have a chance of reaching
+the land.
+
+Such being unquestionably the necessary conditions under which living
+creatures exist, Mr. Darwin discovers in them the instrument of natural
+selection. Suppose that in the midst of this incessant competition some
+individuals of a species (A) present accidental variations which happen
+to fit them a little better than their fellows for the struggle in
+which they are engaged, then the chances are in favour, not only of
+these individuals being better nourished than the others, but of their
+predominating over their fellows in other ways, and of having a better
+chance of leaving offspring, which will of course tend to reproduce the
+peculiarities of their parents. Their offspring will, by a parity of
+reasoning, tend to predominate over their contemporaries, and there
+being (suppose) no room for more than one species such as A, the weaker
+variety will eventually be destroyed by the new destructive influence
+which is thrown into the scale, and the stronger will take its place.
+Surrounding conditions remaining unchanged, the new variety (which we
+may call B)—supposed, for argument’s sake, to be the best adapted for
+these conditions which can be got out of the original stock—will remain
+unchanged, all accidental deviations from the type becoming at once
+extinguished, as less fit for their post than B itself. The tendency of
+B to persist will grow with its persistence through successive
+generations, and it will acquire all the characters of a new species.
+
+But, on the other hand, if the conditions of life change in any degree,
+however slight, B may no longer be that form which is best adapted to
+withstand their destructive, and profit by their sustaining, influence;
+in which case if it should give rise to a more competent variety (C),
+this will take its place and become a new species; and thus, by
+_natural selection_, the species B and C will be successively derived
+from A.
+
+That this most ingenious hypothesis enables us to give a reason for
+many apparent anomalies in the distribution of living beings in time
+and space, and that it is not contradicted by the main phenomena of
+life and organization appear to us to be unquestionable; and so far it
+must be admitted to have an immense advantage over any of its
+predecessors. But it is quite another matter to affirm absolutely
+either the truth or falsehood of Mr. Darwin’s views at the present
+stage of the inquiry. Goethe has an excellent aphorism defining that
+state of mind which he calls _Thätige Skepsis_—active doubt. It is
+doubt which so loves truth that it neither dares rest in doubting, nor
+extinguish itself by unjustified belief; and we commend this state of
+mind to students of species, with respect to Mr. Darwin’s or any other
+hypothesis, as to their origin. The combined investigations of another
+20 years may, perhaps, enable naturalists to say whether the modifying
+causes and the selective power, which Mr. Darwin has satisfactorily
+shown to exist in nature, are competent to produce all the effects he
+ascribes to them, or whether, on the other hand, he has been led to
+over-estimate the value of his principle of natural selection, as
+greatly as Lamarck overestimated his _vera causa_ of modification by
+exercise.
+
+But there is, at all events, one advantage possessed by the more recent
+writer over his predecessor. Mr. Darwin abhors mere speculation as
+nature abhors a vacuum. He is as greedy of cases and precedents as any
+constitutional lawyer, and all the principles he lays down are capable
+of being brought to the test of observation and experiment. The path he
+bids us follow professes to be, not a mere airy track, fabricated of
+ideal cobwebs, but a solid and broad bridge of facts. If it be so, it
+will carry us safely over many a chasm in our knowledge, and lead us to
+a region free from the snares of those fascinating but barren Virgins,
+the Final Causes, against whom a high authority has so justly warned
+us. “My sons, dig in the vineyard,” were the last words of the old man
+in the fable; and, though the sons found no treasure, they made their
+fortunes by the grapes.
+
+ * _Times_, December 26th, 1850.
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Darwinian Hypothesis, by Thomas H. Huxley
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DARWINIAN HYPOTHESIS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 2927-0.txt or 2927-0.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/2/9/2/2927/
+
+This eBook was converted to HTML, with additional editing, by Jose Menendez
+from the text edition produced by Amy E. Zelmer.
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
+be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
+law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
+so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
+States without permission and without paying copyright
+royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
+of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
+concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
+and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
+specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
+eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
+for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
+performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
+away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
+not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
+trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
+
+START: FULL LICENSE
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
+Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
+www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
+destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
+possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
+Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
+by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
+person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
+1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
+agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
+Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
+of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
+works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
+States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
+United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
+claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
+displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
+all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
+that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
+free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
+works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
+Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
+comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
+same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
+you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
+in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
+check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
+agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
+distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
+other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
+representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
+country outside the United States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
+immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
+prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
+on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
+performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
+
+ This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
+ most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
+ restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
+ under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
+ eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
+ United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
+ are located before using this ebook.
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
+derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
+contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
+copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
+the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
+redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
+either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
+obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
+trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
+additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
+will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
+posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
+beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
+any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
+to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
+other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
+version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
+(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
+to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
+of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
+Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
+full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+provided that
+
+* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
+ to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
+ agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
+ Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
+ within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
+ legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
+ payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
+ Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
+ Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
+ Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
+ copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
+ all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
+ works.
+
+* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
+ any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
+ receipt of the work.
+
+* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
+are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
+from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
+Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
+Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
+contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
+or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
+intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
+other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
+cannot be read by your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
+with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
+with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
+lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
+or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
+opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
+the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
+without further opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
+OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
+damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
+violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
+agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
+limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
+unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
+remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
+accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
+production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
+including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
+the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
+or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
+additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
+Defect you cause.
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
+computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
+exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
+from people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
+generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
+Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
+www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
+U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
+mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
+volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
+locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
+Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
+date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
+official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+For additional contact information:
+
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
+DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
+state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
+donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
+freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
+distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
+volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
+the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
+necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
+edition.
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
+facility: www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+