diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:20:07 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:20:07 -0700 |
| commit | 6cc9fbd919925267320998dc116e6c527f9e593a (patch) | |
| tree | ffe09c52d755d6664e1cdbd71d194262dbc01d07 /old | |
Diffstat (limited to 'old')
| -rw-r--r-- | old/thx1510.txt | 1139 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/thx1510.zip | bin | 0 -> 23642 bytes |
2 files changed, 1139 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/thx1510.txt b/old/thx1510.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9baf369 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/thx1510.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1139 @@ +Project Gutenberg Etext On the Study of Zoology, by T. H. Huxley +#25 in our series by Thomas H. Huxley + +Copyright laws are changing all over the world, be sure to check +the laws for your country before redistributing these files!!! + +Please take a look at the important information in this header. +We encourage you to keep this file on your own disk, keeping an +electronic path open for the next readers. + +Please do not remove this. + +This should be the first thing seen when anyone opens the book. +Do not change or edit it without written permission. The words +are carefully chosen to provide users with the information they +need about what they can legally do with the texts. + + +**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** + +**Etexts Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** + +*These Etexts Prepared By Hundreds of Volunteers and Donations* + +Information on contacting Project Gutenberg to get Etexts, and +further information is included below. We need your donations. + +Presently, contributions are only being solicited from people in: +Texas, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, South Dakota, +Iowa, Indiana, and Vermont. As the requirements for other states +are met, additions to this list will be made and fund raising will +begin in the additional states. These donations should be made to: + +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +PMB 113 +1739 University Ave. +Oxford, MS 38655 + + +Title: On the Study of Zoology + +Author: Thomas H. Huxley + +Release Date: November, 2001 [Etext #2935] +[Yes, we are about one year ahead of schedule] + +Edition: 10 + +Project Gutenberg Etext On the Study of Zoology, by T. H. Huxley +******This file should be named thx1510.txt or thx1510.zip****** + +Corrected EDITIONS of our etexts get a new NUMBER, thx1511.txt +VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, thx1510a.txt + +This etext was prepared by Amy E. Zelmer. + +Project Gutenberg Etexts are usually created from multiple editions, +all of which are in the Public Domain in the United States, unless a +copyright notice is included. Therefore, we usually do NOT keep any +of these books in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +We are now trying to release all our books one year in advance +of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing. +Please be encouraged to send us error messages even years after +the official publication date. + +Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till +midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement. +The official release date of all Project Gutenberg Etexts is at +Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A +preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment +and editing by those who wish to do so. + +Most people start at our sites at: +http://gutenberg.net +http://promo.net/pg + + +Those of you who want to download any Etext before announcement +can surf to them as follows, and just download by date; this is +also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the +indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an +announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter. + +http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext01 +or +ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext01 + +Or /etext00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90 + +Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want, +as it appears in our Newsletters. + + +Information about Project Gutenberg (one page) + +We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The +time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours +to get any etext selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright +searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. This +projected audience is one hundred million readers. If our value +per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2 +million dollars per hour this year as we release fifty new Etext +files per month, or 500 more Etexts in 2000 for a total of 3000+ +If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total +should reach over 300 billion Etexts given away by year's end. + +The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away One Trillion Etext +Files by December 31, 2001. [10,000 x 100,000,000 = 1 Trillion] +This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers, +which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users. + +At our revised rates of production, we will reach only one-third +of that goal by the end of 2001, or about 3,333 Etexts unless we +manage to get some real funding. + +Something is needed to create a future for Project Gutenberg for +the next 100 years. + +We need your donations more than ever! + +Presently, contributions are only being solicited from people in: +Texas, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, South Dakota, +Iowa, Indiana, and Vermont. As the requirements for other states +are met, additions to this list will be made and fund raising will +begin in the additional states. + +All donations should be made to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation and will be tax deductible to the extent +permitted by law. + +Mail to: + +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +PMB 113 +1739 University Avenue +Oxford, MS 38655 [USA] + +We are working with the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation to build more stable support and ensure the +future of Project Gutenberg. + +We need your donations more than ever! + +You can get up to date donation information at: + +http://www.gutenberg.net/donation.html + + +*** + +You can always email directly to: + +Michael S. Hart <hart@pobox.com> + +hart@pobox.com forwards to hart@prairienet.org and archive.org +if your mail bounces from archive.org, I will still see it, if +it bounces from prairienet.org, better resend later on. . . . + +We would prefer to send you this information by email. + + +Example command-line FTP session: + +ftp metalab.unc.edu +login: anonymous +password: your@login +cd pub/docs/books/gutenberg +cd etext90 through etext99 or etext00 through etext01, etc. +dir [to see files] +get or mget [to get files. . .set bin for zip files] +GET GUTINDEX.?? [to get a year's listing of books, e.g., GUTINDEX.99] +GET GUTINDEX.ALL [to get a listing of ALL books] + + +**The Legal Small Print** + + +(Three Pages) + +***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS**START*** +Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers. +They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with +your copy of this etext, even if you got it for free from +someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our +fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement +disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how +you can distribute copies of this etext if you want to. + +*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS ETEXT +By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm +etext, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept +this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive +a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this etext by +sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person +you got it from. If you received this etext on a physical +medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request. + +ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM ETEXTS +This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etexts, +is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart +through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project"). +Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright +on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and +distribute it in the United States without permission and +without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth +below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this etext +under the Project's "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark. + +To create these etexts, the Project expends considerable +efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain +works. Despite these efforts, the Project's etexts and any +medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other +things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other +intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged +disk or other etext medium, a computer virus, or computer +codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment. + +LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES +But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below, +[1] the Project (and any other party you may receive this +etext from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm etext) disclaims all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including +legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR +UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT, +INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE +OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE +POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. + +If you discover a Defect in this etext within 90 days of +receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) +you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that +time to the person you received it from. If you received it +on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and +such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement +copy. If you received it electronically, such person may +choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to +receive it electronically. + +THIS ETEXT IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS +TO THE ETEXT OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT +LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A +PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or +the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the +above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you +may have other legal rights. + +INDEMNITY +You will indemnify and hold the Project, its directors, +officers, members and agents harmless from all liability, cost +and expense, including legal fees, that arise directly or +indirectly from any of the following that you do or cause: +[1] distribution of this etext, [2] alteration, modification, +or addition to the etext, or [3] any Defect. + +DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm" +You may distribute copies of this etext electronically, or by +disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this +"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg, +or: + +[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this + requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the + etext or this "small print!" statement. You may however, + if you wish, distribute this etext in machine readable + binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form, + including any form resulting from conversion by word + processing or hypertext software, but only so long as + *EITHER*: + + [*] The etext, when displayed, is clearly readable, and + does *not* contain characters other than those + intended by the author of the work, although tilde + (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may + be used to convey punctuation intended by the + author, and additional characters may be used to + indicate hypertext links; OR + + [*] The etext may be readily converted by the reader at + no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent + form by the program that displays the etext (as is + the case, for instance, with most word processors); + OR + + [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at + no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the + etext in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC + or other equivalent proprietary form). + +[2] Honor the etext refund and replacement provisions of this + "Small Print!" statement. + +[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Project of 20% of the + gross profits you derive calculated using the method you + already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you + don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are + payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation" + the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were + legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent + periodic) tax return. Please contact us beforehand to + let us know your plans and to work out the details. + +WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO? +The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time, +public domain etexts, and royalty free copyright licenses. +If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or +software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at: +hart@pobox.com + +*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN ETEXTS*Ver.04.07.00*END* + + + + + +This etext was prepared by Amy E. Zelmer. +This etext is based on^M +http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/CE2/Hypo.html^M + + + + + +ON THE STUDY OF ZOOLOGY* + +by Thomas H. Huxley + + + + + [footnote] *A Lecture delivered at the South Kensington + Museum in 1861. + +NATURAL HISTORY is the name familiarly applied to the study of the +properties of such natural bodies as minerals, plants, and animals; the +sciences which embody the knowledge man has acquired upon these +subjects are commonly termed Natural Sciences, in contradistinction to +other so-called "physical" sciences; and those who devote themselves +especially to the pursuit of such sciences have been and are commonly +termed "Naturalists." + +Linnaeus was a naturalist in this wide sense, and his 'Systema Naturae' +was a work upon natural history, in the broadest acceptation of the +term; in it, that great methodising spirit embodied all that was known +in his time of the distinctive characters of minerals, animals, and +plants. But the enormous stimulus which Linnaeus gave to the +investigation of nature soon rendered it impossible that any one man +should write another 'Systema Naturae,' and extremely difficult for any +one to become even a naturalist such as Linnaeus was. + +Great as have been the advances made by all the three branches of +science, of old included under the title of natural history, there can +be no doubt that zoology and botany have grown in an enormously greater +ratio than mineralogy; and hence, as I suppose, the name of "natural +history" has gradually become more and more definitely attached to these +prominent divisions of the subject, and by "naturalist" people have +meant more and more distinctly to imply a student of the structure and +function of living beings. + +However this may be, it is certain that the advance of knowledge has +gradually widened the distance between mineralogy and its old +associates, while it has drawn zoology and botany closer together; so +that of late years it has been found convenient (and indeed necessary) +to associate the sciences which deal with vitality and all its +phenomena under the common head of "biology"; and the biologists have +come to repudiate any blood-relationship with their foster-brothers, +the mineralogists. + +Certain broad laws have a general application throughout both the animal +and the vegetable worlds, but the ground common to these kingdoms of +nature is not of very wide extent, and the multiplicity of details is +so great, that the student of living beings finds himself obliged to +devote his attention exclusively either to the one or the other. If he +elects to study plants, under any aspect, we know at once what to call +him. He is a botanist, and his science is botany. But if the +investigation of animal life be his choice, the name generally applied +to him will vary according to the kind of animals he studies, or the +particular phenomena of animal life to which he confines his +attention. If the study of man is his object, he is called an +anatomist, or a physiologist, or an ethnologist; but if he dissects +animals, or examines into the mode in which their functions are +performed, he is a comparative anatomist or comparative physiologist. +If he turns his attention to fossil animals, he is a palaeontologist. +If his mind is more particularly directed to the specific description, +discrimination, classification, and distribution of animals, he is +termed a zoologist. + +For the purpose of the present discourse, however, I shall recognise +none of these titles save the last, which I shall employ as the +equivalent of botanist, and I shall use the term zoology as denoting +the whole doctrine of animal life, in contradistinction to botany, which +signifies the whole doctrine of vegetable life. + +Employed in this sense, zoology, like botany, is divisible into three +great but subordinate sciences, morphology, physiology, and +distribution, each of which may, to a very great extent, be studied +independently of the other. + +Zoological morphology is the doctrine of animal form or structure. +Anatomy is one of its branches; development is another; while +classification is the expression of the relations which different +animals bear to one another, in respect of their anatomy and their +development. + +Zoological distribution is the study of animals in relation to the +terrestrial conditions which obtain now, or have obtained at any +previous epoch of the earth's history. + +Zoological physiology, lastly, is the doctrine of the functions or +actions of animals. It regards animal bodies as machines impelled by +certain forces, and performing an amount of work which can be expressed +in terms of the ordinary forces of nature. The final object of +physiology is to deduce the facts of morphology, on the one hand, and +those of distribution on the other, from the laws of the molecular +forces of matter. + +Such is the scope of zoology. But if I were to content myself with the +enunciation of these dry definitions, I should ill exemplify that +method of teaching this branch of physical science, which it is my +chief business to-night to recommend. Let us turn away then from +abstract definitions. Let us take some concrete living thing, some +animal, the commoner the better, and let us see how the application of +common sense and common logic to the obvious facts it presents, +inevitably leads us into all these branches of zoological science. + +I have before me a lobster. When I examine it, what appears to be the +most striking character it presents? Why, I observe that this part +which we call the tail of the lobster, is made up of six distinct hard +rings and a seventh terminal piece. If I separate one of the middle +rings, say the third, I find it carries upon its under surface a pair +of limbs or appendages, each of which consists of a stalk and two +terminal pieces. So that I can represent a transverse section of the +ring and its appendages upon the diagram board in this way. + +If I now take the fourth ring, I find it has the same structure, and so +have the fifth and the second; so that, in each of these divisions of +the tail, I find parts which correspond with one another, a ring and +two appendages; and in each appendage a stalk and two end pieces. +These corresponding parts are called, in the technical language of +anatomy, "homologous parts." The ring of the third division is the +"homologue" of the ring of the fifth, the appendage of the former is +the homologue of the appendage of the latter. And, as each division +exhibits corresponding parts in corresponding places, we say that all +the divisions are constructed upon the same plan. But now let us +consider the sixth division. It is similar to, and yet different from, +the others. The ring is essentially the same as in the other divisions; +but the appendages look at first as if they were very different; and +yet when we regard them closely, what do we find? A stalk and two +terminal divisions, exactly as in the others, but the stalk is very +short and very thick, the terminal divisions are very broad and flat, +and one of them is divided into two pieces. + +I may say, therefore, that the sixth segment is like the others in plan, +but that it is modified in its details. + +The first segment is like the others, so far as its ring is concerned, +and though its appendages differ from any of those yet examined in the +simplicity of their structure, parts corresponding with the stem and +one of the divisions of the appendages of the other segments can be +readily discerned in them. + +Thus it appears that the lobster's tail is composed of a series of +segments which are fundamentally similar, though each presents peculiar +modifications of the plan common to all. But when I turn to the +forepart of the body I see, at first, nothing but a great shield-like +shell, called technically the "carapace," ending in front in a sharp +spine, on either side of which are the curious compound eyes, set upon +the ends of stout movable stalks. Behind these, on the under side of +the body, are two pairs of long feelers, or antennae, followed by six +pairs of jaws folded against one another over the mouth, and five pairs +of legs, the foremost of these being the great pinchers, or claws, of +the lobster. + +It looks, at first, a little hopeless to attempt to find in this complex +mass a series of rings, each with its pair of appendages, such as I +have shown you in the abdomen, and yet it is not difficult to +demonstrate their existence. Strip off the legs, and you will find that +each pair is attached to a very definite segment of the under wall of +the body; but these segments, instead of being the lower parts of free +rings, as in the tail, are such parts of rings which are all solidly +united and bound together; and the like is true of the jaws, the +feelers, and the eye-stalks, every pair of which is borne upon its own +special segment. Thus the conclusion is gradually forced upon us, that +the body of the lobster is composed of as many rings as there are pairs +of appendages, namely, twenty in all, but that the six hindmost rings +remain free and movable, while the fourteen front rings become firmly +soldered together, their backs forming one continuous shield--the +carapace. + +Unity of plan, diversity in execution, is the lesson taught by the study +of the rings of the body, and the same instruction is given still more +emphatically by the appendages. If I examine the outermost jaw I find +it consists of three distinct portions, an inner, a middle, and an +outer, mounted upon a common stem; and if I compare this jaw with the +legs behind it, or the jaws in front of it, I find it quite easy to +see, that, in the legs, it is the part of the appendage which +corresponds with the inner division, which becomes modified into what we +know familiarly as the "leg," while the middle division disappears, and +the outer division is hidden under the carapace. Nor is it more +difficult to discern that, in the appendages of the tail, the middle +division appears again and the outer vanishes; while, on the other hand, +in the foremost jaw, the so-called mandible, the inner division only is +left; and, in the same way, the parts of the feelers and of the +eye-stalks can be identified with those of the legs and jaws. + +But whither does all this tend? To the very remarkable conclusion that +a unity of plan, of the same kind as that discoverable in the tail or +abdomen of the lobster, pervades the whole organization of its +skeleton, so that I can return to the diagram representing any one of +the rings of the tail, which I drew upon the board, and by adding a +third division to each appendage, I can use it as a sort of scheme or +plan of any ring of the body. I can give names to all the parts of +that figure, and then if I take any segment of the body of the lobster, +I can point out to you exactly, what modification the general plan has +undergone in that particular segment; what part has remained movable, +and what has become fixed to another; what has been excessively +developed and metamorphosed and what has been suppressed. + +But I imagine I hear the question, How is all this to be tested? No +doubt it is a pretty and ingenious way of looking at the structure of +any animal; but is it anything more? Does Nature acknowledge, in any +deeper way, this unity of plan we seem to trace? + +The objection suggested by these questions is a very valid and important +one, and morphology was in an unsound state so long as it rested upon +the mere perception of the analogies which obtain between fully formed +parts. The unchecked ingenuity of speculative anatomists proved itself +fully competent to spin any number of contradictory hypotheses out of +the same facts, and endless morphological dreams threatened to supplant +scientific theory. + +Happily, however, there is a criterion of morphological truth, and a +sure test of all homologies. Our lobster has not always been what we +see it; it was once an egg, a semifluid mass of yolk, not so big as a +pin's head, contained in a transparent membrane, and exhibiting not the +least trace of any one of those organs, whose multiplicity and +complexity, in the adult, are so surprising. After a time a delicate +patch of cellular membrane appeared upon one face of this yolk, and +that patch was the foundation of the whole creature, the clay out of +which it would be moulded. Gradually investing the yolk, it became +subdivided by transverse constrictions into segments, the forerunners +of the rings of the body. Upon the ventral surface of each of the +rings thus sketched out, a pair of bud-like prominences made their +appearance--the rudiments of the appendages of the ring. At first, all +the appendages were alike, but, as they grew, most of them became +distinguished into a stem and two terminal divisions, to which in the +middle part of the body, was added a third outer division; and it was +only at a later period, that by the modification, or absorption, of +certain of these primitive constituents, the limbs acquired their +perfect form. + +Thus the study of development proves that the doctrine of unity of plan +is not merely a fancy, that it is not merely one way of looking at the +matter, but that it is the expression of deep-seated natural facts. The +legs and jaws of the lobster may not merely be regarded as +modifications of a common type,--in fact and in nature they are so,--the +leg and the jaw of the young animal being, at first, indistinguishable. + +These are wonderful truths, the more so because the zoologist finds them +to be of universal application. The investigation of a polype, of a +snail, of a fish, of a horse, or of a man, would have led us, though by +a less easy path, perhaps, to exactly the same point. Unity of plan +everywhere lies hidden under the mask of diversity of structure--the +complex is everywhere evolved out of the simple. Every animal has at +first the form of an egg, and every animal and every organic part, in +reaching its adult state, passes through conditions common to other +animals and other adult parts; and this leads me to another point. I +have hitherto spoken as if the lobster were alone in the world, but, as +I need hardly remind you, there are myriads of other animal organisms. +Of these, some, such as men, horses, birds, fishes, snails, slugs, +oysters, corals, and sponges, are not in the least like the lobster. +But other animals, though they may differ a good deal from the lobster, +are yet either very like it, or are like something that is like it. The +cray fish, the rock lobster, and the prawn, and the shrimp, for +example, however different, are yet so like lobsters, that a child +would group them as of the lobster kind, in contradistinction to snails +and slugs; and these last again would form a kind by themselves, in +contradistinction to cows, horses, and sheep, the cattle kind. + +But this spontaneous grouping into "kinds" is the first essay of the +human mind at classification, or the calling by a common name of those +things that are alike, and the arranging them in such a manner as best +to suggest the sum of their likenesses and unlikenesses to other +things. + +Those kinds which include no other subdivisions than the sexes, or +various breeds, are called, in technical language, species. The +English lobster is a species, our cray fish is another, our prawn is +another. In other countries, however, there are lobsters, cray fish, +and prawns, very like ours, and yet presenting sufficient differences +to deserve distinction. Naturalists, therefore, express this +resemblance and this diversity by grouping them as distinct species of +the same "genus." But the lobster and the cray fish, though belonging +to distinct genera, have many features in common, and hence are grouped +together in an assemblage which is called a family. More distant +resemblances connect the lobster with the prawn and the crab, which are +expressed by putting all these into the same order. Again, more remote, +but still very definite, resemblances unite the lobster with the +woodlouse, the king crab, the water flea, and the barnacle, and +separate them from all other animals; whence they collectively +constitute the larger group, or class, 'Crustacea'. But the +'Crustacea' exhibit many peculiar features in common with insects, +spiders, and centipedes, so that these are grouped into the still +larger assemblage or "province" 'Articulata'; and, finally, the +relations which these have to worms and other lower animals, are +expressed by combining the whole vast aggregate into the sub-kingdom of +'Annulosa'. + +If I had worked my way from a sponge instead of a lobster, I should have +found it associated, by like ties, with a great number of other animals +into the sub-kingdom 'Protozoa'; if I had selected a fresh-water polype +or a coral, the members of what naturalists term the sub-kingdom +'Coelenterata', would have grouped themselves around my type; had a +snail been chosen, the inhabitants of all univalve and bivalve, land +and water, shells, the lamp shells, the squids, and the sea-mat would +have gradually linked themselves on to it as members of the same +sub-kingdom of 'Mollusca'; and finally, starting from man, I should have +been compelled to admit first, the ape, the rat, the horse, the dog, +into the same class; and then the bird, the crocodile, the turtle, the +frog, and the fish, into the same sub-kingdom of 'Vertebrata'. + +And if I had followed out all these various lines of classification +fully, I should discover in the end that there was no animal, either +recent or fossil, which did not at once fall into one or other of these +sub-kingdoms. In other words, every animal is organized upon one or +other of the five, or more, plans, whose existence renders our +classification possible. And so definitely and precisely marked is the +structure of each animal, that, in the present state of our knowledge, +there is not the least evidence to prove that a form, in the slightest +degree transitional between any of the two groups 'Vertebrata', +'Annulosa', 'Mollusca', and 'Coelenterata', either exists, or has +existed, during that period of the earth's history which is recorded by +the geologist. Nevertheless, you must not for a moment suppose, because +no such transitional forms are known, that the members of the +sub-kingdoms are disconnected from, or independent of, one another. On +the contrary, in their earliest condition they are all alike, and the +primordial germs of a man, a dog, a bird, a fish, a beetle, a snail, and +a polype are, in no essential structural respects, distinguishable. + +In this broad sense, it may with truth be said, that all living animals, +and all those dead creations which geology reveals, are bound together +by an all-pervading unity of organization, of the same character, +though not equal in degree, to that which enables us to discern one and +the same plan amidst the twenty different segments of a lobster's body. +Truly it has been said, that to a clear eye the smallest fact is a +window through which the Infinite may be seen. + +Turning from these purely morphological considerations, let us now +examine into the manner in which the attentive study of the lobster +impels us into other lines of research. + +Lobsters are found in all the European seas; but on the opposite shores +of the Atlantic and in the seas of the southern hemisphere they do not +exist. They are, however, represented in these regions by very closely +allied, but distinct forms--the 'Homarus Americanus' and the 'Homarus +Capensis': so that we may say that the European has one species of +'Homarus'; the American, another; the African, another; and thus the +remarkable facts of geographical distribution begin to dawn upon us. + +Again, if we examine the contents of the earth's crust, we shall find in +the latter of those deposits, which have served as the great burying +grounds of past ages, numberless lobster-like animals, but none so +similar to our living lobster as to make zoologists sure that they +belonged even to the same genus. If we go still further back in time, +we discover, in the oldest rocks of all, the remains of animals, +constructed on the same general plan as the lobster, and belonging to +the same great group of 'Crustacea'; but for the most part totally +different from the lobster, and indeed from any other living form of +crustacean; and thus we gain a notion of that successive change of the +animal population of the globe, in past ages, which is the most +striking fact revealed by geology. + +Consider, now, where our inquiries have led us. We studied our type +morphologically, when we determined its anatomy and its development, +and when comparing it, in these respects, with other animals, we made +out its place in a system of classification. If we were to examine +every animal in a similar manner, we should establish a complete body of +zoological morphology. + +Again, we investigated the distribution of our type in space and in +time, and, if the like had been done with every animal, the sciences of +geographical and geological distribution would have attained their +limit. + +But you will observe one remarkable circumstance, that, up to this +point, the question of the life of these organisms has not come under +consideration. Morphology and distribution might be studied almost as +well, if animals and plants were a peculiar kind of crystals, and +possessed none of those functions which distinguish living beings so +remarkably. But the facts of morphology and distribution have to be +accounted for, and the science, whose aim it is to account for them, is +Physiology. + +Let us return to our lobster once more. If we watched the creature in +its native element, we should see it climbing actively the submerged +rocks, among which it delights to live, by means of its strong legs; or +swimming by powerful strokes of its great tail, the appendages of whose +sixth joint are spread out into a broad fan-like propeller: seize it, +and it will show you that its great claws are no mean weapons of +offence; suspend a piece of carrion among its haunts, and it will +greedily devour it, tearing and crushing the flesh by means of its +multitudinous jaws. + +Suppose that we had known nothing of the lobster but as an inert mass, +an organic crystal, if I may use the phrase, and that we could suddenly +see it exerting all these powers, what wonderful new ideas and new +questions would arise in our minds! The great new question would be, +"How does all this take place?" the chief new idea would be, the idea +of adaptation to purpose,--the notion, that the constituents of animal +bodies are not mere unconnected parts, but organs working together to +an end. Let us consider the tail of the lobster again from this point +of view. Morphology has taught us that it is a series of segments +composed of homologous parts, which undergo various +modifications--beneath and through which a common plan of formation is +discernible. But if I look at the same part physiologically, I see +that it is a most beautifully constructed organ of locomotion, by means +of which the animal can swiftly propel itself either backwards or +forwards. + +But how is this remarkable propulsive machine made to perform its +functions? If I were suddenly to kill one of these animals and to take +out all the soft parts, I should find the shell to be perfectly inert, +to have no more power of moving itself than is possessed by the +machinery of a mill when disconnected from its steam-engine or +water-wheel. But if I were to open it, and take out the viscera only, +leaving the white flesh, I should perceive that the lobster could bend +and extend its tail as well as before. If I were to cut off the tail, I +should cease to find any spontaneous motion in it; but on pinching any +portion of the flesh, I should observe that it underwent a very curious +change--each fibre becoming shorter and thicker. By this act of +contraction, as it is termed, the parts to which the ends of the fibre +are attached are, of course, approximated; and according to the +relations of their points of attachment to the centres of motions of +the different rings, the bending or the extension of the tail results. +Close observation of the newly-opened lobster would soon show that all +its movements are due to the same cause--the shortening and thickening +of these fleshy fibres, which are technically called muscles. + +Here, then, is a capital fact. The movements of the lobster are due to +muscular contractility. But why does a muscle contract at one time and +not at another? Why does one whole group of muscles contract when the +lobster wishes to extend his tail, and another group when he desires to +bend it? What is it originates, directs, and controls the motive +power? + +Experiment, the great instrument for the ascertainment of truth in +physical science, answers this question for us. In the head of the +lobster there lies a small mass of that peculiar tissue which is known +as nervous substance. Cords of similar matter connect this brain of +the lobster, directly or indirectly, with the muscles. Now, if these +communicating cords are cut, the brain remaining entire, the power of +exerting what we call voluntary motion in the parts below the section +is destroyed; and on the other hand, if, the cords remaining entire, the +brain mass be destroyed, the same voluntary mobility is equally lost. +Whence the inevitable conclusion is, that the power of originating +these motions resides in the brain, and is propagated along the nervous +cords. + +In the higher animals the phenomena which attend this transmission have +been investigated, and the exertion of the peculiar energy which +resides in the nerves has been found to be accompanied by a disturbance +of the electrical state of their molecules. + +If we could exactly estimate the signification of this disturbance; if +we could obtain the value of a given exertion of nerve force by +determining the quantity of electricity, or of heat, of which it is the +equivalent; if we could ascertain upon what arrangement, or other +condition of the molecules of matter, the manifestation of the nervous +and muscular energies depends (and doubtless science will some day or +other ascertain these points), physiologists would have attained their +ultimate goal in this direction; they would have determined the relation +of the motive force of animals to the other forms of force found in +nature; and if the same process had been successfully performed for all +the operations which are carried on in, and by, the animal frame, +physiology would be perfect, and the facts of morphology and +distribution would be deducible from the laws which physiologists had +established, combined with those determining the condition of the +surrounding universe. + +There is not a fragment of the organism of this humble animal whose +study would not lead us into regions of thought as large as those which +I have briefly opened up to you; but what I have been saying, I trust, +has not only enabled you to form a conception of the scope and purport +of zoology, but has given you an imperfect example of the manner in +which, in my opinion, that science, or indeed any physical science, may +be best taught. The great matter is, to make teaching real and +practical, by fixing the attention of the student on particular facts; +but at the same time it should be rendered broad and comprehensive, by +constant reference to the generalizations of which all particular facts +are illustrations. The lobster has served as a type of the whole +animal kingdom, and its anatomy and physiology have illustrated for us +some of the greatest truths of biology. The student who has once seen +for himself the facts which I have described, has had their relations +explained to him, and has clearly comprehended them, has, so far, a +knowledge of zoology, which is real and genuine, however limited it may +be, and which is worth more than all the mere reading knowledge of the +science he could ever acquire. His zoological information is, so far, +knowledge and not mere hear-say. + +And if it were my business to fit you for the certificate in zoological +science granted by this department, I should pursue a course precisely +similar in principle to that which I have taken to-night. I should +select a fresh-water sponge, a fresh-water polype or a 'Cyanaea', a +fresh-water mussel, a lobster, a fowl, as types of the five primary +divisions of the animal kingdom. I should explain their structure very +fully, and show how each illustrated the great principles of zoology. +Having gone very carefully and fully over this ground, I should feel +that you had a safe foundation, and I should then take you in the same +way, but less minutely, over similarly selected illustrative types of +the classes; and then I should direct your attention to the special +forms enumerated under the head of types, in this syllabus, and to the +other facts there mentioned. + +That would, speaking generally, be my plan. But I have undertaken to +explain to you the best mode of acquiring and communicating a knowledge +of zoology, and you may therefore fairly ask me for a more detailed and +precise account of the manner in which I should propose to furnish you +with the information I refer to. + +My own impression is, that the best model for all kinds of training in +physical science is that afforded by the method of teaching anatomy, in +use in the medical schools. This method consists of three +elements--lectures, demonstrations, and examinations. + +The object of lectures is, in the first place, to awaken the attention +and excite the enthusiasm of the student; and this, I am sure, may be +effected to a far greater extent by the oral discourse and by the +personal influence of a respected teacher than in any other way. +Secondly, lectures have the double use of guiding the student to the +salient points of a subject, and at the same time forcing him to attend +to the whole of it, and not merely to that part which takes his fancy. +And lastly, lectures afford the student the opportunity of seeking +explanations of those difficulties which will, and indeed ought to, +arise in the course of his studies. + +But for a student to derive the utmost possible value from lectures, +several precautions are needful. + +I have a strong impression that the better a discourse is, as an +oration, the worse it is as a lecture. The flow of the discourse +carries you on without proper attention to its sense; you drop a word +or a phrase, you lose the exact meaning for a moment, and while you +strive to recover yourself, the speaker has passed on to something +else. + +The practice I have adopted of late years, in lecturing to students, is +to condense the substance of the hour's discourse into a few dry +propositions, which are read slowly and taken down from dictation; the +reading of each being followed by a free commentary expanding and +illustrating the proposition, explaining terms, and removing any +difficulties that may be attackable in that way, by diagrams made +roughly, and seen to grow under the lecturer's hand. In this manner +you, at any rate, insure the co-operation of the student to a certain +extent. He cannot leave the lecture-room entirely empty if the taking +of notes is enforced; and a student must be preternaturally dull and +mechanical, if he can take notes and hear them properly explained, and +yet learn nothing. + +What books shall I read? is a question constantly put by the student to +the teacher. My reply usually is, "None: write your notes out +carefully and fully; strive to understand them thoroughly; come to me +for the explanation of anything you cannot understand; and I would +rather you did not distract your mind by reading." A properly composed +course of lectures ought to contain fully as much matter as a student +can assimilate in the time occupied by its delivery; and the teacher +should always recollect that his business is to feed, and not to cram +the intellect. Indeed, I believe that a student who gains from a course +of lectures the simple habit of concentrating his attention upon a +definitely limited series of facts, until they are thoroughly mastered, +has made a step of immeasurable importance. + +But, however good lectures may be, and however extensive the course of +reading by which they are followed up, they are but accessories to the +great instrument of scientific teaching--demonstration. If I insist +unweariedly, nay fanatically, upon the importance of physical science +as an educational agent, it is because the study of any branch of +science, if properly conducted, appears to me to fill up a void left by +all other means of education. I have the greatest respect and love for +literature; nothing would grieve me more than to see literary training +other than a very prominent branch of education: indeed, I wish that +real literary discipline were far more attended to than it is; but I +cannot shut my eyes to the fact, that there is a vast difference +between men who have had a purely literary, and those who have had a +sound scientific, training. + +Seeking for the cause of this difference, I imagine I can find it in the +fact that, in the world of letters, learning and knowledge are one, and +books are the source of both; whereas in science, as in life, learning +and knowledge are distinct, and the study of things, and not of books, +is the source of the latter. + +All that literature has to bestow may be obtained by reading and by +practical exercise in writing and in speaking; but I do not exaggerate +when I say, that none of the best gifts of science are to be won by +these means. On the contrary, the great benefit which a scientific +education bestows, whether as training or as knowledge, is dependent +upon the extent to which the mind of the student is brought into +immediate contact with facts--upon the degree to which he learns the +habit of appealing directly to Nature, and of acquiring through his +senses concrete images of those properties of things, which are, and +always will be, but approximatively expressed in human language. Our +way of looking at Nature, and of speaking about her, varies from year +to year; but a fact once seen, a relation of cause and effect, once +demonstratively apprehended, are possessions which neither change nor +pass away, but, on the contrary, form fixed centres, about which other +truths aggregate by natural affinity. + +Therefore, the great business of the scientific teacher is, to imprint +the fundamental, irrefragable facts of his science, not only by words +upon the mind, but by sensible impressions upon the eye, and ear, and +touch of the student, in so complete a manner, that every term used, or +law enunciated, should afterwards call up vivid images of the particular +structural, or other, facts which furnished the demonstration of the +law, or the illustration of the term. + +Now this important operation can only be achieved by constant +demonstration, which may take place to a certain imperfect extent +during a lecture, but which ought also to be carried on independently, +and which should be addressed to each individual student, the teacher +endeavouring, not so much to show a thing to the learner, as to make him +see it for himself. + +I am well aware that there are great practical difficulties in the way +of effectual zoological demonstrations. The dissection of animals is +not altogether pleasant, and requires much time; nor is it easy to +secure an adequate supply of the needful specimens. The botanist has +here a great advantage; his specimens are easily obtained, are clean +and wholesome, and can be dissected in a private house as well as +anywhere else; and hence, I believe, the fact, that botany is so much +more readily and better taught than its sister science. But, be it +difficult or be it easy, if zoological science is to be properly +studied, demonstration, and, consequently, dissection, must be had. +Without it, no man can have a really sound knowledge of animal +organization. + +A good deal may be done, however, without actual dissection on the +student's part, by demonstration upon specimens and preparations; and +in all probability it would not be very difficult, were the demand +sufficient, to organize collections of such objects, sufficient for all +the purposes of elementary teaching, at a comparatively cheap rate. +Even without these, much might be effected, if the zoological +collections, which are open to the public, were arranged according to +what has been termed the "typical principle"; that is to say, if the +specimens exposed to public view were so selected that the public could +learn something from them, instead of being, as at present, merely +confused by their multiplicity. For example, the grand ornithological +gallery at the British Museum contains between two and three thousand +species of birds, and sometimes five or six specimens of a species. +They are very pretty to look at, and some of the cases are, indeed, +splendid; but I will undertake to say, that no man but a professed +ornithologist has ever gathered much information from the collection. +Certainly, no one of the tens of thousands of the general public who +have walked through that gallery ever knew more about the essential +peculiarities of birds when he left the gallery than when he entered +it. But if, somewhere in that vast hall, there were a few preparations, +exemplifying the leading structural peculiarities and the mode of +development of a common fowl; if the types of the genera, the leading +modifications in the skeleton, in the plumage at various ages, in the +mode of nidification, and the like, among birds, were displayed; and if +the other specimens were put away in a place where the men of science, +to whom they are alone useful, could have free access to them, I can +conceive that this collection might become a great instrument of +scientific education. + +The last implement of the teacher to which I have adverted is +examination--a means of education now so thoroughly understood that I +need hardly enlarge upon it. I hold that both written and oral +examinations are indispensable, and, by requiring the description of +specimens, they may be made to supplement demonstration. + +Such is the fullest reply the time at my disposal will allow me to give +to the question--how may a knowledge of zoology be best acquired and +communicated? + +But there is a previous question which may be moved, and which, in fact, +I know many are inclined to move. It is the question, why should +training masters be encouraged to acquire a knowledge of this, or any +other branch of physical science? What is the use, it is said, of +attempting to make physical science a branch of primary education? Is +it not probable that teachers, in pursuing such studies, will be led +astray from the acquirement of more important but less attractive +knowledge? And, even if they can learn something of science without +prejudice to their usefulness, what is the good of their attempting to +instil that knowledge into boys whose real business is the acquisition +of reading, writing, and arithmetic? + +These questions are, and will be, very commonly asked, for they arise +from that profound ignorance of the value and true position of physical +science, which infests the minds of the most highly educated and +intelligent classes of the community. But if I did not feel well +assured that they are capable of being easily and satisfactorily +answered; that they have been answered over and over again; and that +the time will come when men of liberal education will blush to raise +such questions,--I should be ashamed of my position here to-night. +Without doubt, it is your great and very important function to carry +out elementary education; without question, anything that should +interfere with the faithful fulfilment of that duty on your part would +be a great evil; and if I thought that your acquirement of the elements +of physical science, and your communication of those elements to your +pupils, involved any sort of interference with your proper duties, I +should be the first person to protest against your being encouraged to +do anything of the kind. + +But is it true that the acquisition of such a knowledge of science as is +proposed, and the communication of that knowledge, are calculated to +weaken your usefulness? Or may I not rather ask, is it possible for +you to discharge your functions properly without these aids? + +What is the purpose of primary intellectual education? I apprehend that +its first object is to train the young in the use of those tools +wherewith men extract knowledge from the ever-shifting succession of +phenomena which pass before their eyes; and that its second object is +to inform them of the fundamental laws which have been found by +experience to govern the course of things, so that they may not be +turned out into the world naked, defenceless, and a prey to the events +they might control. + +A boy is taught to read his own and other languages, in order that he +may have access to infinitely wider stores of knowledge than could ever +be opened to him by oral intercourse with his fellow men; he learns to +write, that his means of communication with the rest of mankind may be +indefinitely enlarged, and that he may record and store up the knowledge +he acquires. He is taught elementary mathematics, that he may +understand all those relations of number and form, upon which the +transactions of men, associated in complicated societies, are built, +and that he may have some practice in deductive reasoning. + +All these operations of reading, writing, and ciphering, are +intellectual tools, whose use should, before all things, be learned, +and learned thoroughly; so that the youth may be enabled to make his +life that which it ought to be, a continual progress in learning and in +wisdom. + +But, in addition, primary education endeavours to fit a boy out with a +certain equipment of positive knowledge. He is taught the great laws +of morality; the religion of his sect; so much history and geography as +will tell him where the great countries of the world are, what they +are, and how they have become what they are. + +Without doubt all these are most fitting and excellent things to teach a +boy; I should be very sorry to omit any of them from any scheme of +primary intellectual education. The system is excellent, so far as it +goes. + +But if I regard it closely, a curious reflection arises. I suppose +that, fifteen hundred years ago, the child of any well-to-do Roman +citizen was taught just these same things; reading and writing in his +own, and, perhaps, the Greek tongue; the elements of mathematics; and +the religion, morality, history, and geography current in his time. +Furthermore, I do not think I err in affirming, that, if such a +Christian Roman boy, who had finished his education, could be +transplanted into one of our public schools, and pass through its course +of instruction, he would not meet with a single unfamiliar line of +thought; amidst all the new facts he would have to learn, not one would +suggest a different mode of regarding the universe from that current in +his own time. + +And yet surely there is some great difference between the civilization +of the fourth century and that of the nineteenth, and still more +between the intellectual habits and tone of thought of that day and +this? + +And what has made this difference? I answer fearlessly--The prodigious +development of physical science within the last two centuries. + +Modern civilization rests upon physical science; take away her gifts to +our own country, and our position among the leading nations of the +world is gone to-morrow; for it is physical science only, that makes +intelligence and moral energy stronger than brute force. + +The whole of modern thought is steeped in science; it has made its way +into the works of our best poets, and even the mere man of letters, who +affects to ignore and despise science, is unconsciously impregnated +with her spirit, and indebted for his best products to her methods. I +believe that the greatest intellectual revolution mankind has yet seen +is now slowly taking place by her agency. She is teaching the world +that the ultimate court of appeal is observation and experiment, and +not authority; she is teaching it to estimate the value of evidence; she +is creating a firm and living faith in the existence of immutable moral +and physical laws, perfect obedience to which is the highest possible +aim of an intelligent being. + +But of all this your old stereotyped system of education takes no note. +Physical science, its methods, its problems, and its difficulties, will +meet the poorest boy at every turn, and yet we educate him in such a +manner that he shall enter the world as ignorant of the existence of +the methods and facts of science as the day he was born. The modern +world is full of artillery; and we turn out our children to do battle +in it, equipped with the shield and sword of an ancient gladiator. + +Posterity will cry shame on us if we do not remedy this deplorable state +of things. Nay, if we live twenty years longer, our own consciences +will cry shame on us. + +It is my firm conviction that the only way to remedy it is, to make the +elements of physical science an integral part of primary education. I +have endeavoured to show you how that may be done for that branch of +science which it is my business to pursue; and I can but add, that I +should look upon the day when every schoolmaster throughout this land +was a centre of genuine, however rudimentary, scientific knowledge, as +an epoch in the history of the country. + +But let me entreat you to remember my last words. Addressing myself to +you, as teachers, I would say, mere book learning in physical science +is a sham and a delusion--what you teach, unless you wish to be +impostors, that you must first know; and real knowledge in science +means personal acquaintance with the facts, be they few or many.* + + [footnote] *It has been suggested to me that these words may + be taken to imply a discouragement on my part of any sort + of scientific instruction which does not give an + acquaintance with the facts at first hand. But this is not + my meaning. The ideal of scientific teaching is, no doubt, + a system by which the scholar sees every fact for himself, + and the teacher supplies only the explanations. + Circumstances, however, do not often allow of the + attainment of that ideal, and we must put up with the next + best system--one in which the scholar takes a good deal on + trust from a teacher, who, knowing the facts by his own + knowledge, can describe them with so much vividness as to + enable his audience to form competent ideas concerning + them. The system which I repudiate is that which allows + teachers who have not come into direct contact with the + leading facts of a science to pass their second-hand + information on. The scientific virus, like vaccine lymph, + if passed through too long a succession of organisms, will + lose all its effect in protecting the young against the + intellectual epidemics to which they are exposed. + + + + + +End of Project Gutenberg Etext On the Study of Zoology, by T. H. Huxley + diff --git a/old/thx1510.zip b/old/thx1510.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..3ef93d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/thx1510.zip |
