diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 19:53:24 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 19:53:24 -0700 |
| commit | 996a35f5e47605680f45caf5e349d96b66e55b65 (patch) | |
| tree | db32bd22c37ede3182536092caba9d6b64c3c800 | |
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitattributes | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 30252-0.txt | 838 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 30252-h/30252-h.htm | 905 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 30252-h/images/image_001.jpg | bin | 0 -> 31547 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 30252-h/images/image_002.jpg | bin | 0 -> 31464 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 30252-h/images/image_003.jpg | bin | 0 -> 33216 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 30252-h/images/image_004.jpg | bin | 0 -> 36783 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 30252-h/images/image_w.jpg | bin | 0 -> 2588 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | LICENSE.txt | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/30252-h.zip | bin | 0 -> 153632 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/30252-h/30252-h.htm | 1323 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg | bin | 0 -> 31547 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg | bin | 0 -> 31464 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg | bin | 0 -> 33216 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg | bin | 0 -> 36783 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg | bin | 0 -> 2588 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/30252.txt | 1230 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/30252.zip | bin | 0 -> 22426 bytes |
19 files changed, 4312 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6833f05 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +* text=auto +*.txt text +*.md text diff --git a/30252-0.txt b/30252-0.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1e71d75 --- /dev/null +++ b/30252-0.txt @@ -0,0 +1,838 @@ +*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 30252 *** + + Transcriber's Note: + + This etext was produced from Analog Science Fact & Fiction March 1961. + Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U.S. copyright + on this publication was renewed. + + + + THE + + FOUR-FACED + + VISITORS + + OF ... EZEKIEL + + + + + By ARTHUR W. ORTON + + + + _Ezekiel, they say, "saw de wheel"--but he saw somewhat more + than that. And Orton suggests that what he saw made + perfectly good sense ... to the understanding!_ + + + + Illustrated by Orton + + * * * * * + + + + +We are told from our Sunday School days that the Bible is a "living +book," the oldest of man's written works that is read and used anew, +from generation to generation. It remains "living" because we are able +to find new meaning to fit our daily lives. Although it is not the +usual kind of new meaning, I believe that I have found something of +the sort in the very old prophesies of Ezekiel. + +Bible scholars have long recognized the first chapter of Ezekiel as a +strange and nearly unfathomable account of a vision. I suggest that it +is strange only because it is written by a man far removed from us in +time and experience, about a subject totally unfamiliar to men of his +time. I do not think that this was a vision in the usual sense, nor +was it meant to be mystical. This particular chapter has been called +"Science fiction in the Bible" and many attempts have been made to +unravel the meaning of the original author, along both spiritual and +mundane lines. I am convinced that this chapter is the account of an +actual happening; the landing of extraterrestial beings, reported by a +careful, truthful and self-possessed observer. + +I am not a student of theology and therefore you may feel that I am +being presumptive in attempting to throw light on a mystery as old and +well-studied as Ezekiel's first chapter. I feel that any success that +I may have in doing so will be due to the accident of my birth at the +very beginning of an era when the events I have to describe are fact, +or are about to become fact. + +If, as I believe, this is an account of an actual encounter with men +from space, I may be better able to interpret the meaning than a +student of theology, who by training and interest, is looking for a +theological meaning. I have worked with mechanical things, and as an +instructor of aircraft mechanics for most of my adult life. During +this time I have had to untangle a lot of mechanical misconceptions +and misunderstandings. I think that this gives me some insight into +this problem. + +If you are not too familiar with the Old Testament, I suggest that you +read through the first chapter of Ezekiel to get the feeling of the +flow of words, and a general idea of what sort of material we will be +covering. If you have done a considerable amount of reading in the +Bible, I am sure you will notice at once how different and +"un-Bible-like" this chapter sounds. It isn't long. The first chapter +covers little more than one page. Don't expect to get a clear picture +the first time through. It seems to have an elusive quality. About the +time you feel that you have hold of a fact, it seems to be +contradicted in a later verse. I am going to try to show you that this +is due to your own preconceived notions of what some of the words and +phrases mean. You, not Ezekiel, are supplying the contradictions. + +You will see that I am not going to make excuses for the words, as +written. It is my belief that those who had the task of translating +the Bible from its original tongue and re-copying it through the ages +were particularly careful of this chapter because they did not +understand it and were afraid of damaging it. + +Let us begin with the first verse of chapter one: + + +_The Book of The Prophet EZEKIEL_ + + +803. Chapter 1 + + +_Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in +the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river +of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God._ + + +_2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king +Jehoiachin's captivity._ + + +_3. The word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the +son of Buzi, in the Land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the +hand of the Lord was there upon him._ + +This fixes the location of this incident on the outskirts of Bagdad. +The Chebar is sometimes called "The Grand Canal of Bagdad." Although +the entire book was supposed to have been written by Ezekiel, the +second and third verses sound like an editor's note, inserted by a +later writer. + + +_4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a +great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about +it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the +midst of the fire._ + +Here is a man who had lived most of his life in arid desert country. +He had probably seen whirlwinds of all kinds, from dust-devils to +full-scale tornadoes. He was an accurate and honest observer, as we +shall see later. If he said it was a whirlwind, it must have really +been one, or at least it looked enough like one to fool him for a +while. Notice that he does not say that it was high in the air, or +that it came out of the sky, but, "... out of the north," or toward +him from the north. + +The first thing that he noticed was that it had fire associated with +it, a strange companion for a whirlwind. There is something strange +about the fire itself. He says that it "infolds itself," which +suggests a fire of more active nature than Ezekiel would be accustomed +to. The association of fire and whirlwind must have struck him as +peculiar. + +Also something amber colored was associated with the cloud and fire. +He said that this color came "out of the midst," which might mean that +it was above the cloud and flame, or appeared as the fire and cloud +subsided, or blew to one side. Considering the detail he gives in +later verses, this is quite vague, as it might be if he saw it from a +distance. + + +_5. Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living +creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a +man._ + +Why didn't he say that out came four men? Remember that he is telling +this to very primitive, superstitious people. He was himself bred in a +time when the supernatural was taken for granted. Under these +conditions he has gone about as far as he could by saying that they +certainly looked like four men. He does not say here that he took them +for angels or any other kind of supernatural beings. + + +_6. And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings._ + +This short verse is very clear, yet you wonder how a creature with +four faces and four wings could possibly be taken for a man, even by +you or me. + +Although he does not say so, we can imply that these creatures must +have advanced much closer to him after they got out of the fire and +cloud, for him to be able to see so much detail. + +Imagine the courage it took for him to stay put in order to observe +these creatures. Notice also how objective he is, never mentioning his +own feelings. + + +_7. And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was +like the sole of a calf's foot; and they sparkled like the colour of +burnished brass._ + +Each verse of the description covers one or two parts of the +creatures. When Ezekiel mentions more than one part it becomes +confusing, so that one verse seems to contradict another. These can +usually be sorted out however. Nowhere will you find a direct +contradiction. + +Here he is describing the feet only. The word "straight" can be taken +several ways. Does he mean _regular feet_, or feet that point straight +forward, or feet that are straight up and down, like an elephant's? +Probably he means regular, forward-pointing feet because he does not +dwell on the point. In other places he leans heavily on simile to +describe some unusual feature of the beings. + +The sole of the foot sounds as if it was heavily cleated. What then +has he described in this verse? For a person living in a warm climate +who had never seen any footwear more complicated than a sandal, he has +described a highly polished leather, plastic or metal boot very well. + + +_8. And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four +sides; and they four had their faces and their wings._ + +Notice carefully that he is _not_ saying that each creature had four +man-like hands, one on each of four sides. He is saying that each has +the normal number of hands and they are located _below_ their wings. +Remember that he was a careful observer and he had probably noticed +that birds have wings _instead_ of arms. These had both. In addition, +he has given us another bit of information about the distribution of +the wings. They do not appear to be arranged like a biplane, but each +wing is at a ninety-degree angle from its neighboring wing like a +helicopter. + +Ezekiel must have been something of a numerologist. He points out that +there are four creatures, and each of the four has four faces each, +and each has four wings each--but not four hands. + + +_9. Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they +went; they went every one straight forward._ + +He is not saying that the wings of one creature are joined to the +wings of another creature. He is saying that each wing is joined to +another wing, not directly to the creature. + +The second and third parts of this verse present a mystery. We do not +know what the "theys" refer to. There are three "theys" in this verse, +one after another and we are given very few clues to which refer to +_creatures_ and which refer to wings. The first "they" most likely is +tied to the first part of the verse and therefore refers to the wings. +Given this, there are still three interpretations: + + 1. _The wings_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The wings_ + went every one straight forward. + + 2. _The wings_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; _The + wings_ went every one straight forward. + + 3. _The wings_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; _The + creatures_ went every one straight forward. + +None of these three statements make much of a point, whether the +creatures have helicopter wings, or bird-angel wings. Let us assume +then that the first "they" refers to the creatures: + + 1. _The creatures_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; + _The creatures_ went every one straight forward. + + 2. _The creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The + wings_ went every one straight forward. + + 3. _The creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The + creatures_ went every one straight forward. + +This last statement would pretty well describe the action of the +blades of an inoperative helicopter being carried forward in a +straight line. It would strike Ezekiel as odd that the wings might +move and turn without turning the men under them. You might wonder why +he would say "... wings went ..." instead of "... wings turned...." +When a light breeze moves the blades of an inoperative helicopter the +blades not only turn, but they change their pitch and plane in a most +random manner. + +Although Ezekiel has not completed his description of the creatures, +we can try now to form a picture of what he saw. No matter how we bend +and squeeze, we are not going to get a Michelangelo-type angel. Look +at figure one. Go back over the points that Ezekiel has described. You +will see that it fits quite well. + + +_10. As for the likeness of the faces, they four had the face of a +man, and the face of a lion, on the right side; and they four had the +face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an +eagle._ + +[Illustration] + +This again does not sound very man-like. You wonder what could have +kept him from pronouncing them demons. If you will study figure two, +you will see what Ezekiel described. Now look at figure three. How +much better could a man living six centuries before Christ describe +figure three? + + +_11. Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; Two +wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their +bodies._ + +See figure one again. The arrangement is like he describes. Notice +that when he talks about "... the wings ..." of one creature, he +apparently means the whole system of wings and attachments. + + +_12. And they went every one straight forward: wither the spirit was +to go, they went; and they turned not as they went._ + +Again we have trouble with the "theys." Notice however, that the first part +of this verse repeats the last part of verse nine. If we were right in that +verse, the first "they" in this refers to the creatures again. The second +part of this verse contains a new idea, "whither the spirit was to go ...", +has an opposite meaning from "... they went ... straight forward ..." +and, "... they turned not when they went." The first and last part sounds +like the four creatures were marching purposefully in one direction. If +then the second or middle part refers to the wings, we could read it: + + "And _the creatures_ went every one straight forward: + whither the spirit was to go, _the wings_ went; and _the + creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went." + +Again we have a picture of four men walking with their inoperative +helicopters moving in several different ways as the breeze and the +men's motions cause them to move slightly. + +Notice that Ezekiel seems to be more impressed with the wings and +their motion than with any other feature of what he witnessed. + + +_13. As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was +like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went +up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and +out of the fire went forth lightning._ + +[Illustration] + +Here he is describing their over-all appearance. We can assume that +creatures that look like men but has a surface that resembles lights, +coals and fire must be wearing suits with a brightly colored metallic +surface. The modern anodized aluminium coatings glisten and sparkle +with an effect like he describes. If these are space-suits, there is a +good reason for making them gaudy. If they were worn in space while +working on and around a ship, they should be as bright and +eye-catching as possible, in the case the man became detached and +floated away. He would be quite visible against the blackness of +space. + + +_14. And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a +flash of lightning._ + +This might mean that they moved swiftly, but more than likely it means +that they sparkled and shined on all sides, and this was visible as +they moved about. + +This ends the description for a while. There are two later verses of +description, but we will take this when we come to it. It is +surprising that Ezekiel has organized his material so well. It reads +like a scientific report. If he had headed the section that we just +covered, "Description," we would not have been too surprised to find +the following section headed, "Action": + + +_15. Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the +earth by the living creatures, with his four faces._ + +If we read Ezekiel correctly and the creatures did have helicopter +attachments on their backs, we can assume that one of them now +started his helicopter, which would appear as a "wheel" to Ezekiel, +and probably surprised him greatly. + + +_16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the +colour of Beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance +and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel._ + +Here we must digress in order to put ourselves into the life and time +of this man because he has mentioned the wheel. A wheel did not have +quite the same meaning for him as it does for you and I, living in a +mechanical age. The wheel in 600 B.C. in the area around the eastern +end of the Mediterranean, the most civilized part of the world at that +time, had only a few very limited uses. + +One use, old even in Ezekiel's time was the potter's wheel; a simple +platform mounted on crude vertical bearings so that it could be turned +with one hand while the clay was worked with the other. From this the +grindstone and the lapidary wheel developed for working metal and +stone. These early machines probably employed some form of foot +treadle but even these could not turn the wheel very fast. If the +stone had a large enough diameter, it was possible to get the speed at +the outer edge high enough to produce sparks when grinding hard +material. The "work" took place at some distance from the axis, +usually at the edge of the stone. + +The wheel we usually associate with ancient times is the cart wheel. +In its earliest form it was a solid wheel, like those still in use in +primitive sections of Mexico. Even with the cart wheel, ancient man +would associate the edge of the wheel with the "work" of the wheel. +This was the part that left a track in the mud and dust, crushed an +occasional rock and fractured an occasional toe. + +In order to increase the efficiency of military chariots it was +necessary to build a wheel that was lighter, yet just as strong as the +solid model. This was first done by cutting out "lightening holes" +between the hub and rim. Pressing this invention to the ultimate +produced a spoked wheel. The Egyptians used a six-spoked chariot wheel +thousands of years before Ezekiel's time, and the Greeks and others +had four-spoke models. This was quite an invention and in addition to +its useful aspects, it produced some rather unusual, even magical +side-effects. As every child knows, if you turn your tricycle +upside-down and spin the wheel, the spokes seem to vanish. All that +can be seen is the rim and the parts of the hub near the center of +rotation. No matter what shape the hub actually is, it too looks round +like a wheel. It is very likely that such an effect was referred to as +"a wheel within a wheel." + +In verse 16 Ezekiel says that, "wheels and their work was the colour +of beryl ...", a blue-green color. This sounds like the emphasis is on +the color at the _edge_ of the wheel. This could be from a flame +coming from jets on the tips of the rotors. + +All of the creatures must have started their rotors. ("... they four +had one likeness.") They looked like "... a wheel in the middle of a +wheel." Or the spinning spokes of a wheel. Notice also that he never +mentions "wings" and "wheels" at the same time, for when one appears +the other vanishes. + + +_17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned +not when they went._ + +If four men were standing fairly close together on the ground with +running helicopters, they would tend to spread out as they left the +ground, so as to not run into each other. Moreover, with a helicopter, +it is not necessary to _face_ the direction you intend to go. This +sounds like four men lifting off the ground, spreading out slightly +and starting up and away, in formation. + + +_18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; +and their rings were full of eyes round about them four._ + +The four creatures are now high in the air above Ezekiel, a dreadful +and awe-inspiring sight for a man of Ezekiel's time. Their "rings" +obviously are the flames from their tip-jets, seen from below--the +only part of the wheel now visible from far below. And the rings +_would_ be full of eyes. When a jet or rocket motor is operating there +is a shock wave generated in the tailpipe which tends to cut the +exhaust gas into segments. Time exposures of jet aircraft at night +often show this. When a tip-jet is operating, these bright, evenly +spaced spots give it the appearance of a string of pearls, "... full +of eyes round about them...." + + +_19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went up by them: +and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the +wheels were lifted up._ + +Ezekiel makes it clear that he does not know whether the men are +lifting the wheels or the wheels lifting the men, but both went up +together. + + +_20. Withersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their +spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted over against them: for the +spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels._ + +This is a most sophisticated opinion. Although Ezekiel was describing +only what he saw, he could not help but have some opinions about the +creatures. In verse nineteen he makes it clear that he does not know +whether man is lifting the machine, or the other way around, but here +he makes it clear that whichever, there is no doubt that the creatures +are _controlling_. They are not being carried off by the will of the +wheel. + + +_21. When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood; +and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted +up over against them: for the spirit of the living creatures was in +the wheels._ + +This carries the idea of control one step farther. Not only are the +men controlling the wheels, but they are self-controlled: They are +flying in formation. + + +_22. And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living +creatures was as the colour of terrible crystal, stretched forth over +their heads above._ + +Perhaps this verse was moved out of it's original position, for it +returns to the description of the creatures. You may have noticed that +many of the verses are written so that it is in part, an enlargement +of the thought put forward in the preceding verse, and part new +thought, to be enlarged upon in the following verse. Verses twenty-two +and twenty-three _seem_ to go together. Both would fit the rest of the +chapter better if they were between verses twelve and thirteen. + +What is meant by "firmament"? These people had no term for a +hollow-sphere. Most spherical objects were not hollow. They had no +soap, so they had no soap bubbles. The most common thing to compare a +hollow sphere to was the sky, the bowl of the heavens--the firmament. +This crystal-clear bubble was over the heads of the creatures, one on +each creature. + +We will come to the word firmament again, but notice that this is, +"... the _likeness_ of the firmament ...", not the firmament itself. +Later verses speak only of the "firmament". + + +_23. And under the firmaments were their wings straight, the one +toward the other: every one had two, which covered on this side, and +every one had two which covered on that side, their bodies._ + +If you changed "... under the firmament ..." to, "... below the sky" +you would get a clearer picture. If you look at the picture of a +house, the roof is, "below the sky," if you start at the top and work +down. If you start at the ground and work up, the roof is, "at the +top" of the house. Ezekiel's description of the wings, which is +continued in this verse, concerns the wings "at the top." They are +(connected), "... one toward the other, about like in figure one." + + +_24. And when they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the +noise of great waters, like the voice of the Almighty, the voice of +speech, as the noise of the host: when they stood they let down their +wings._ + +If you have ever stood near a running tip-jet, or any jet engine, I +think you will know what Ezekiel means. The last statement is most +interesting. It seems that when the creatures landed again they +detached the helicopter mechanisms and set them down, as anyone will +with a heavy back-pack who is resting or waiting. + + +_25. And there was a voice from the firmament that was over their +heads, when they stood, and had let down their wings._ + +This voice, or sound, was not from the _likeness_ of the firmament, +but from the sky, as they stood there with their wings off. + +This is the end of Ezekiel's attention to the four creatures. + + +_26. And above the firmament that was over their heads was the +likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone; and upon +the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man +above upon it._ + +Out of the sky comes a man on a green seat. But a throne is more than +a chair. It is usually associated with a platform. This may be some +kind of flying platform similar to those being tested for the +transporting of infantry. + + +_27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round +about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and +from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the +appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about._ + +Since this thing was high over their heads, and he saw fire round +about it, the fire may have been on the under side. What he says about +the man is very like what he said about the other four, except that he +describes the man from the waist, up and down, as if he could not see +the area near the man's waist. + + +_28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of +rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was +the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I +saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one who spake._ + +What prismatic effect, brighter than the outdoor desert sunshine is +hard to imagine, but a large shining object close at hand would be +pretty terrifying. It seems strange that Ezekiel would not throw +himself upon the ground, after withstanding all he had seen up till +now, but we must remember that a man seated on a throne, a flying +throne at that might have a lot more meaning for him than it would for +you and me. If this object happened to come down closer to him than +the other creatures had, he might well have broken. + +We have now covered every verse of the first chapter quite thoroughly. +Since the Book of Ezekiel contains forty-eight chapters, we might fear +that this is just the beginning of a long and tiring study. +Fortunately or unfortunately this is not the case. The second chapter +begins: + + +_804._ + +_And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon they feet, and I will +speak to thee._ + +_2. And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me +upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me._ + +_3. And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of +Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and +their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day._ + +This typically prophetic writing goes on for many pages, telling the +woes and sins of the Israelites. Reference is made in a few places to +the material in the first chapter, but even this dies out before the +end of the book. + +No mention is made again of the living creatures till chapter three +where the following verse is found: + + +_13. I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that +touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against them, +and a noise of great rushing._ + +This combines some of the ideas of earlier verses without adding any +new information. Notice that writer has the notion that the wings of +one creature touched those of another, or that the creatures touched +one another. + +This verse is typical of several more scattered throughout the first +third of the book. All the verses mentioning the living creatures +after the first chapter are more dramatic and all fail to continue the +style of a careful reporter. No new ideas are advanced, but some +rather unusual contradictions are introduced, by using several parts +of several verses of Chapter One. Chapter Ten reads like an attempt at +rephrasing Chapter One and Chapter Eleven is the last mention of the +living creatures in the entire book. + +Although it contains no further information on the living creatures, +Chapter Three has a verse that should be mentioned. Verse fifteen +sounds like a fitting conclusion to the first chapter: + +[Illustration] + + +_15. Then I came to them of the captivity at Tel-Abib, that dwelt by +the river Chebar, and I sat where they sat, and remained there +astonished among them for seven days._ + +Just what do we have? We have a description of four spacesuited and +helicopter-equipped men, getting off of, or out of something that +landed in a cloud of dust or smoke. The four men start their +helicopters, take off and fly to some height. On returning to the +ground they remove their flying gear and wait. They are met by a fifth +man, riding on a flying platform. Such an event would cause some +interest in any community today, but in those times it could only be +interpreted as supernatural--a miracle. The miracle may well be that +the story has been preserved for us, twenty-six centuries later. + +A word for word interpretation is only part of the oddity of this +chapter. Several other aspects are worth pondering. The whole chapter +has a well-worn feeling, as though the author had told and re-told it +many times. It reads like a deposition, taken down by a police +officer, after the witness, who prides himself on truthfulness, has +told the story over and over to his incredulous friends. It has a +certain poetic beauty. It has the style of one who is telling you the +truth, no matter whether you are going to believe it or not. It is +the presentation of a tableau that makes no sense to the man who +witnessed it, or to those to whom he is describing it. + +The product of a man's imagination is tied to his own experience, his +own time. A wonderful tale of the supernatural may sound very +imaginative to the contemporary of the teller, but it will date itself +to a later generation. The lives of the Greek gods are related to the +lives of the early Greeks. An imaginative science-fiction writer such +as Jules Verne is limited in the same way. As good as he was, +experience has set an outer limit to his imagination. Ezekiel's tale +is not in this class. To his contemporaries, it was out of step with +reality. To us it is real enough, but out of step with time. The most +credible explanation is that it really happened. + + * * * * * + +Perhaps there are some points of my interpretation that you do not +agree with, but as a whole the story does hang together rather well. +If you have the feeling that it would be easy to fit the words around +an entirely different set of circumstances, I suggest that you try. + +It is interesting to know that some years ago a verbal battle raged in +theological circles as to whether Ezekiel wrote the Book of Ezekiel. +One school of thought held that he did, while the other school held +that the first chapter was a "forgery," written in the third century +before Christ, and tacked on as a sort of "leader" to Ezekiel's book. +For our purposes it cannot be a forgery. It makes little difference +how long ago it was written, so long as it was not since World War II! + +Suppose Ezekiel or some ancient man actually saw what I have proposed. +What are the possible explanations? Is it possible that some ancient +race, unknown to us, could have developed such equipment? It is not +likely. During the last one hundred years we have been prodding about +in the earth and finding so many ancient records that someone else +besides Ezekiel would certainly have left us a report on them. + +The things that were science fiction twenty years ago are solid fact +now. We know that a landing on the Moon is only a question of time, a +few years at the most. The planets of our Solar System will follow, at +least some before the turn of the century, probably. As for the +planets of neighboring stars we cannot say. We have no way of +exploring them at present, but that is not the same as saying that we +never will. If the past performance of the human race is any measure, +they will likely fall to exploration within two hundred years. + +If you concede that it is possible that we can visit other star +systems in a future not too distant, why then could we not have been +visited some time in the past? It may tend to deflate our ego to think +that there may be intelligent beings not too different from us who are +advanced beyond us. It need not. One of the most striking features of +Ezekiel's story, if it has been decoded correctly, is that these +beings are very much like we are, right at the present time. That puts +them three or four thousand years ahead of us, a very small amount +indeed when we consider the long sweep of human life and development +before the dawn of written history. + +We are so used to stories of "Bug-eyed Monsters" coming to Earth, that +the idea of beings from other worlds looking and acting human seems +fantastic. It should not. There is good sound scientific reason to +believe that there is little chance of it being any other way. Life is +a delicate and fragile thing when compared to cosmic extremes of +temperature and environment in our universe. If life formed on earth +as science now believes that it did, we must have had just the right +size planet at just the right distance from a particular type of star. +While such extremely narrow limits are going to reduce the number of +places in the universe where life can develop, it is also going to +limit the _differences_. In our creation things operate by rule. The +rule is that in similar circumstance there are similar solutions to a +problem. Man is the solution of the problem of building the highest +form of life on Earth. On a similar planet we can expect to find a +similar solution. This is simply the extension of the theory of +_parallel evolution_ to a cosmic scale. + +If then, we were visited by people from another world, what were they +doing here? Strangely enough, there is considerable evidence of what +they were up to from Ezekiel's own testimony. Let us suppose that +these creatures were very much like we expect to be in five hundred +years. They have come from some other star system in a ship whose +principle of operation is as yet unknown to us. We can assume that it +was a rather large ship, being that there were five beings on board at +once, and we can presume that enough of a crew remained aboard to +return it home in case something happened to the explorers. How would +we proceed in such a case? + +It is not likely that such a large ship would be brought down to the +surface of the earth. After arriving in the neighborhood of the earth, +it would be put into orbit, and the surface of the earth would be +studied through telescopes for days or weeks. The entire radio +spectrum would be scanned to determine if there were inhabitants +below, capable of operating electrical equipment. A small--manned or +unmanned--flyer would be sent down into the upper atmosphere to +determine the level of radioactivity, air components, spore and +bacteria count and radio signals incapable of penetrating the +atmosphere. From the ship the land areas would be mapped and studied. +Any large object on the ground that appeared to be of an artificial +nature would be given particular attention. During the night-time +hours below, these objects and areas would be very carefully observed +for signs of light. + +In the case of our visitors of twenty-six centuries ago, this is what +they would have found: Quite a few artificial works could be seen. +Cultivated fields and large buildings would be easily visible in many +places around the eastern end of the Mediterranean. The Pyramids were +old even then. (The Great Wall in China probably had not been +started.) There would be no radio sounds, except for an occasional +lightning click. We do not know how well their cities were lighted at +night, but they were probably too dim to see. Tiny orange pinpoints of +light from outdoor bonfires could probably be seen around the globe, +but there would be more of them around the Mediterranean and in the +East and Near East than anywhere else. The radioactivity level would +be low. Our visitors would conclude that the inhabitants were either +in the early stages of civilization, or were once highly civilized and +now sunk back to a primitive stage. They would know that this was due +to something other than atomic war. + +We have to conclude that these were moral beings. If the conditions +below were as they seemed to be, that of an early civilization, they +would not want to interfere. They would want to observe without being +observed, so even if it were technically possible they would not want +to bring a large ship down. They would send down as small and +inconspicuous a vehicle as possible. + +We usually picture such a craft as a small version of the larger ship, +or a large--by our standards--rocket, or an aircraft similar to our +Dyna-soar. For people this advanced technologically something a lot +simpler might be used. It might be an open vehicle, similar to our +flying platforms, but with vastly more powerful nuclear power plants. +The men going down would have to wear air-tight suits--spacesuits, and +would have to leave them on all the time they were below, for fear of +becoming infected with molds and viruses that the natives would long +since have become immune to. One man, the pilot, would stay with the +platform while the others did the observing and recording. + +The flying platform would have no need for rapid forward motion, at +least inside the atmosphere and therefore would have little need for +streamlining or protective covering for the passengers, who would +carry their equipment with them. Most of the equipment for the survey +would be built into the suits. They would each carry a set of portable +helicopter attachments so they could cover more ground in a hurry. +Like small helicopters of our time, these probably would have a rather +limited speed and range, but they would be extremely maneuverable. + +The platform on the other hand, being nuclear powered, would probably +be very powerful and have almost unlimited range, but it would be less +maneuverable. The products of its exhaust might be radioactive and +therefore its operators would be reluctant to operate it above or +near the natives of the planet, or places that they frequented. + +As they push away from the mother-ship the spacemen would be in +free-fall and would tend to "float" nearby until they turned the +bottom side of the platform toward the direction of their orbit and +applied power. They would then drop toward the surface, but with +almost unlimited power available they could keep the downward +component of their fall within limits and prevent overheating. They +could probably be on the surface in less than an hour. + +The first and most likely area of exploration would be Egypt. The +platform could be landed a few miles back from the Nile and be in +completely unoccupied desert. The four helicopter-equipped explorers +could put on their rotating-wing backpacks and by keeping low, come up +very close to some center of civilization without being seen. By going +up to a few thousand feet they could observe a fairly large area. Even +if they were spotted, they would be small and unrecognizable, and +cause a minimum amount of excitement. + +Like any tourist in any age they would probably be most interested in +the territory around the pyramids. When they had finished here they +might want to look over the country around what is now Bagdad, but +_then_ only near the capital city of Nebuchadnezzar's empire. This is +about eight hundred miles away, an impractical trip by helicopter, so +they would return to the platform, climb to a few hundred thousand +feet, and scoot over in a few minutes. Here they would land again in +some uninhabited spot and repeat the maneuver. This country was +probably sprinkled with more people than they expected. Maybe that's +why this is the legendary flying carpet country, or maybe not. At any +rate, one lonely military prisoner, working by himself near the banks +of a stream must have seen them. Even if they did notice him, what +possible harm could he do? In the present state of the civilization +who would remember what he said or even believe him? I do. + + +THE END + + * * * * * + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by +Arthur W. Orton + +*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 30252 *** diff --git a/30252-h/30252-h.htm b/30252-h/30252-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1b94229 --- /dev/null +++ b/30252-h/30252-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,905 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" /> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of ... Ezekiel, by Arthur W. Orton + </title> + <style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; background-color: #FFFFFF; +} + + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { + text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ + clear: both; +} + +p { + margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; +} + +hr { + width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; +} + + +.tr {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; margin-top: 5%; margin-bottom: 5%; padding: 2em; background-color: #f6f2f2; color: black; border: dotted black 1px;} + +.blockquot { + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +.f1 { margin-left:40%; font-size:larger; font-weight:bold; } +.center {text-align: center;} + +/* Images */ +.figcenter { + margin: auto; + text-align: center; +} + +.figleft { + float: left; + clear: left; + margin-left: 0; + margin-bottom: 0em; + margin-top: 0.25em; + margin-right: 0.25em; + padding: 0; + text-align: center; +} + + +/* XML end ]]>*/ + </style> + </head> +<body> +<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 30252 ***</div> + +<div class="tr"><p class="center">Transcriber's Note:</p> +<p class="center">This etext was produced from Analog Science Fact & Fiction March 1961. Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U.S. copyright on this publication was renewed.</p></div> +<p> </p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<img src="images/image_001.jpg" width="400" height="545" alt="" title="" /> +</div> + +<h1>THE<br /> + +FOUR-FACED<br /> + +VISITORS<br /> + +OF ... EZEKIEL</h1> + +<p> </p> +<h2>By ARTHUR W. ORTON</h2> +<p> </p> +<div class="blockquot"><p><i>Ezekiel, they say, "saw de wheel"—but he saw somewhat more +than that. And Orton suggests that what he saw made +perfectly good sense ... to the understanding!</i></p></div> +<p> </p> +<h3>Illustrated by Orton</h3> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<div class="figleft" style="width: 50px;"> +<img src="images/image_w.jpg" width="50" height="50" alt="" title="" /> +</div> +<p>e are told from our Sunday School days that the Bible is a "living +book," the oldest of man's written works that is read and used anew, +from generation to generation. It remains "living" because we are able +to find new meaning to fit our daily lives. Although it is not the +usual kind of new meaning, I believe that I have found something of +the sort in the very old prophesies of Ezekiel.</p> + +<p>Bible scholars have long recognized the first chapter of Ezekiel as a +strange and nearly unfathomable account of a vision. I suggest that it +is strange only because it is written by a man far removed from us in +time and experience, about a subject totally unfamiliar to men of his +time. I do not think that this was a vision in the usual sense, nor +was it meant to be mystical. This particular chapter has been called +"Science fiction in the Bible" and many attempts have been made to +unravel the meaning of the original author, along both spiritual and +mundane lines. I am convinced that this chapter is the account of an +actual happening; the landing of extraterrestial beings, reported by a +careful, truthful and self-possessed observer.</p> + +<p>I am not a student of theology and therefore you may feel that I am +being presumptive in attempting to throw light on a mystery as old and +well-studied as Ezekiel's first chapter. I feel that any success that +I may have in doing so will be due to the accident of my birth at the +very beginning of an era when the events I have to describe are fact, +or are about to become fact.</p> + +<p>If, as I believe, this is an account of an actual encounter with men +from space, I may be better able to interpret the meaning than a +student of theology, who by training and interest, is looking for a +theological meaning. I have worked with mechanical things, and as an +instructor of aircraft mechanics for most of my adult life. During +this time I have had to untangle a lot of mechanical misconceptions +and misunderstandings. I think that this gives me some insight into +this problem.</p> + +<p>If you are not too familiar with the Old Testament, I suggest that you +read through the first chapter of Ezekiel to get the feeling of the +flow of words, and a general idea of what sort of material we will be +covering. If you have done a considerable amount of reading in the +Bible, I am sure you will notice at once how different and +"un-Bible-like" this chapter sounds. It isn't long. The first chapter +covers little more than one page. Don't expect to get a clear picture +the first time through. It seems to have an elusive quality. About the +time you feel that you have hold of a fact, it seems to be +contradicted in a later verse. I am going to try to show you that this +is due to your own preconceived notions of what some of the words and +phrases mean. You, not Ezekiel, are supplying the contradictions.</p> + +<p>You will see that I am not going to make excuses for the words, as +written. It is my belief that those who had the task of translating +the Bible from its original tongue and re-copying it through the ages +were particularly careful of this chapter because they did not +understand it and were afraid of damaging it.</p> + +<p>Let us begin with the first verse of chapter one:</p> + + +<h4><i>The Book of The Prophet</i></h4> +<h3><i>EZEKIEL</i></h3> + +<p>803.<span class="f1">Chapter 1</span></p> + +<p><i>Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in +the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river +of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God.</i></p> + + +<p><i>2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king +Jehoiachin's captivity.</i></p> + + +<p><i>3. The word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the +son of Buzi, in the Land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the +hand of the Lord was there upon him.</i></p> + +<p>This fixes the location of this incident on the outskirts of Bagdad. +The Chebar is sometimes called "The Grand Canal of Bagdad." Although +the entire book was supposed to have been written by Ezekiel, the +second and third verses sound like an editor's note, inserted by a +later writer.</p> + + +<p><i>4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a +great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about +it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the +midst of the fire.</i></p> + +<p>Here is a man who had lived most of his life in arid desert country. +He had probably seen whirlwinds of all kinds, from dust-devils to +full-scale tornadoes. He was an accurate and honest observer, as we +shall see later. If he said it was a whirlwind, it must have really +been one, or at least it looked enough like one to fool him for a +while. Notice that he does not say that it was high in the air, or +that it came out of the sky, but, "... out of the north," or toward +him from the north.</p> + +<p>The first thing that he noticed was that it had fire associated with +it, a strange companion for a whirlwind. There is something strange +about the fire itself. He says that it "infolds itself," which +suggests a fire of more active nature than Ezekiel would be accustomed +to. The association of fire and whirlwind must have struck him as +peculiar.</p> + +<p>Also something amber colored was associated with the cloud and fire. +He said that this color came "out of the midst," which might mean that +it was above the cloud and flame, or appeared as the fire and cloud +subsided, or blew to one side. Considering the detail he gives in +later verses, this is quite vague, as it might be if he saw it from a +distance.</p> + + +<p><i>5. Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living +creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a +man.</i></p> + +<p>Why didn't he say that out came four men? Remember that he is telling +this to very primitive, superstitious people. He was himself bred in a +time when the supernatural was taken for granted. Under these +conditions he has gone about as far as he could by saying that they +certainly looked like four men. He does not say here that he took them +for angels or any other kind of supernatural beings.</p> + + +<p><i>6. And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings.</i></p> + +<p>This short verse is very clear, yet you wonder how a creature with +four faces and four wings could possibly be taken for a man, even by +you or me.</p> + +<p>Although he does not say so, we can imply that these creatures must +have advanced much closer to him after they got out of the fire and +cloud, for him to be able to see so much detail.</p> + +<p>Imagine the courage it took for him to stay put in order to observe +these creatures. Notice also how objective he is, never mentioning his +own feelings.</p> + + +<p><i>7. And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was +like the sole of a calf's foot; and they sparkled like the colour of +burnished brass.</i></p> + +<p>Each verse of the description covers one or two parts of the +creatures. When Ezekiel mentions more than one part it becomes +confusing, so that one verse seems to contradict another. These can +usually be sorted out however. Nowhere will you find a direct +contradiction.</p> + +<p>Here he is describing the feet only. The word "straight" can be taken +several ways. Does he mean <i>regular feet</i>, or feet that point straight +forward, or feet that are straight up and down, like an elephant's? +Probably he means regular, forward-pointing feet because he does not +dwell on the point. In other places he leans heavily on simile to +describe some unusual feature of the beings.</p> + +<p>The sole of the foot sounds as if it was heavily cleated. What then +has he described in this verse? For a person living in a warm climate +who had never seen any footwear more complicated than a sandal, he has +described a highly polished leather, plastic or metal boot very well.</p> + + +<p><i>8. And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four +sides; and they four had their faces and their wings.</i></p> + +<p>Notice carefully that he is <i>not</i> saying that each creature had four +man-like hands, one on each of four sides. He is saying that each has +the normal number of hands and they are located <i>below</i> their wings. +Remember that he was a careful observer and he had probably noticed +that birds have wings <i>instead</i> of arms. These had both. In addition, +he has given us another bit of information about the distribution of +the wings. They do not appear to be arranged like a biplane, but each +wing is at a ninety-degree angle from its neighboring wing like a +helicopter.</p> + +<p>Ezekiel must have been something of a numerologist. He points out that +there are four creatures, and each of the four has four faces each, +and each has four wings each—but not four hands.</p> + + +<p><i>9. Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they +went; they went every one straight forward.</i></p> + +<p>He is not saying that the wings of one creature are joined to the +wings of another creature. He is saying that each wing is joined to +another wing, not directly to the creature.</p> + +<p>The second and third parts of this verse present a mystery. We do not +know what the "theys" refer to. There are three "theys" in this verse, +one after another and we are given very few clues to which refer to +<i>creatures</i> and which refer to wings. The first "they" most likely is +tied to the first part of the verse and therefore refers to the wings. +Given this, there are still three interpretations:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>1. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The wings</i> +went every one straight forward.</p> + +<p>2. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; <i>The +wings</i> went every one straight forward.</p> + +<p>3. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; <i>The +creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p></div> + +<p>None of these three statements make much of a point, whether the +creatures have helicopter wings, or bird-angel wings. Let us assume +then that the first "they" refers to the creatures:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>1. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; +<i>The creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p> + +<p>2. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The +wings</i> went every one straight forward.</p> + +<p>3. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The +creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p></div> + +<p>This last statement would pretty well describe the action of the +blades of an inoperative helicopter being carried forward in a +straight line. It would strike Ezekiel as odd that the wings might +move and turn without turning the men under them. You might wonder why +he would say "... wings went ..." instead of "... wings turned...." +When a light breeze moves the blades of an inoperative helicopter the +blades not only turn, but they change their pitch and plane in a most +random manner.</p> + +<p>Although Ezekiel has not completed his description of the creatures, +we can try now to form a picture of what he saw. No matter how we bend +and squeeze, we are not going to get a Michelangelo-type angel. Look +at figure one. Go back over the points that Ezekiel has described. You +will see that it fits quite well.</p> + + +<p><i>10. As for the likeness of the faces, they four had the face of a +man, and the face of a lion, on the right side; and they four had the +face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an +eagle.</i></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<img src="images/image_002.jpg" width="400" height="337" alt="" title="" /> +</div> + +<p>This again does not sound very man-like. You wonder what could have +kept him from pronouncing them demons. If you will study figure two, +you will see what Ezekiel described. Now look at figure three. How +much better could a man living six centuries before Christ describe +figure three?</p> + + +<p><i>11. Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; Two +wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their +bodies.</i></p> + +<p>See figure one again. The arrangement is like he describes. Notice +that when he talks about "... the wings ..." of one creature, he +apparently means the whole system of wings and attachments.</p> + + +<p><i>12. And they went every one straight forward: wither the spirit was +to go, they went; and they turned not as they went.</i></p> + +<p>Again we have trouble with the "theys." Notice however, that the first +part of this verse repeats the last part of verse nine. If we were +right in that verse, the first "they" in this refers to the creatures +again. The second part of this verse contains a new idea, "whither the +spirit was to go ...", has an opposite meaning from "... they went +... straight forward ..." and, "... they turned not when they went." +The first and last part sounds like the four creatures were marching +purposefully in one direction. If then the second or middle part +refers to the wings, we could read it:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"And <i>the creatures</i> went every one straight forward: +whither the spirit was to go, <i>the wings</i> went; and <i>the +creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went."</p></div> + +<p>Again we have a picture of four men walking with their inoperative +helicopters moving in several different ways as the breeze and the +men's motions cause them to move slightly.</p> + +<p>Notice that Ezekiel seems to be more impressed with the wings and +their motion than with any other feature of what he witnessed.</p> + + +<p><i>13. As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was +like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went +up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and +out of the fire went forth lightning.</i></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<img src="images/image_003.jpg" width="400" height="338" alt="" title="" /> +</div> + +<p>Here he is describing their over-all appearance. We can assume that +creatures that look like men but has a surface that resembles lights, +coals and fire must be wearing suits with a brightly colored metallic +surface. The modern anodized aluminium coatings glisten and sparkle +with an effect like he describes. If these are space-suits, there is a +good reason for making them gaudy. If they were worn in space while +working on and around a ship, they should be as bright and +eye-catching as possible, in the case the man became detached and +floated away. He would be quite visible against the blackness of +space.</p> + + +<p><i>14. And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a +flash of lightning.</i></p> + +<p>This might mean that they moved swiftly, but more than likely it means +that they sparkled and shined on all sides, and this was visible as +they moved about.</p> + +<p>This ends the description for a while. There are two later verses of +description, but we will take this when we come to it. It is +surprising that Ezekiel has organized his material so well. It reads +like a scientific report. If he had headed the section that we just +covered, "Description," we would not have been too surprised to find +the following section headed, "Action":</p> + + +<p><i>15. Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the +earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.</i></p> + +<p>If we read Ezekiel correctly and the creatures did have helicopter +attachments on their backs, we can assume that one of them now +started his helicopter, which would appear as a "wheel" to Ezekiel, +and probably surprised him greatly.</p> + + +<p><i>16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the +colour of Beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance +and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.</i></p> + +<p>Here we must digress in order to put ourselves into the life and time +of this man because he has mentioned the wheel. A wheel did not have +quite the same meaning for him as it does for you and I, living in a +mechanical age. The wheel in 600 B.C. in the area around the eastern +end of the Mediterranean, the most civilized part of the world at that +time, had only a few very limited uses.</p> + +<p>One use, old even in Ezekiel's time was the potter's wheel; a simple +platform mounted on crude vertical bearings so that it could be turned +with one hand while the clay was worked with the other. From this the +grindstone and the lapidary wheel developed for working metal and +stone. These early machines probably employed some form of foot +treadle but even these could not turn the wheel very fast. If the +stone had a large enough diameter, it was possible to get the speed at +the outer edge high enough to produce sparks when grinding hard +material. The "work" took place at some distance from the axis, +usually at the edge of the stone.</p> + +<p>The wheel we usually associate with ancient times is the cart wheel. +In its earliest form it was a solid wheel, like those still in use in +primitive sections of Mexico. Even with the cart wheel, ancient man +would associate the edge of the wheel with the "work" of the wheel. +This was the part that left a track in the mud and dust, crushed an +occasional rock and fractured an occasional toe.</p> + +<p>In order to increase the efficiency of military chariots it was +necessary to build a wheel that was lighter, yet just as strong as the +solid model. This was first done by cutting out "lightening holes" +between the hub and rim. Pressing this invention to the ultimate +produced a spoked wheel. The Egyptians used a six-spoked chariot wheel +thousands of years before Ezekiel's time, and the Greeks and others +had four-spoke models. This was quite an invention and in addition to +its useful aspects, it produced some rather unusual, even magical +side-effects. As every child knows, if you turn your tricycle +upside-down and spin the wheel, the spokes seem to vanish. All that +can be seen is the rim and the parts of the hub near the center of +rotation. No matter what shape the hub actually is, it too looks round +like a wheel. It is very likely that such an effect was referred to as +"a wheel within a wheel."</p> + +<p>In verse 16 Ezekiel says that, "wheels and their work was the colour +of beryl ...", a blue-green color. This sounds like the emphasis is on +the color at the <i>edge</i> of the wheel. This could be from a flame +coming from jets on the tips of the rotors.</p> + +<p>All of the creatures must have started their rotors. ("... they four +had one likeness.") They looked like "... a wheel in the middle of a +wheel." Or the spinning spokes of a wheel. Notice also that he never +mentions "wings" and "wheels" at the same time, for when one appears +the other vanishes.</p> + + +<p><i>17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned +not when they went.</i></p> + +<p>If four men were standing fairly close together on the ground with +running helicopters, they would tend to spread out as they left the +ground, so as to not run into each other. Moreover, with a helicopter, +it is not necessary to <i>face</i> the direction you intend to go. This +sounds like four men lifting off the ground, spreading out slightly +and starting up and away, in formation.</p> + + +<p><i>18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; +and their rings were full of eyes round about them four.</i></p> + +<p>The four creatures are now high in the air above Ezekiel, a dreadful +and awe-inspiring sight for a man of Ezekiel's time. Their "rings" +obviously are the flames from their tip-jets, seen from below—the +only part of the wheel now visible from far below. And the rings +<i>would</i> be full of eyes. When a jet or rocket motor is operating there +is a shock wave generated in the tailpipe which tends to cut the +exhaust gas into segments. Time exposures of jet aircraft at night +often show this. When a tip-jet is operating, these bright, evenly +spaced spots give it the appearance of a string of pearls, "... full +of eyes round about them...."</p> + + +<p><i>19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went up by them: +and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the +wheels were lifted up.</i></p> + +<p>Ezekiel makes it clear that he does not know whether the men are +lifting the wheels or the wheels lifting the men, but both went up +together.</p> + + +<p><i>20. Withersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their +spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted over against them: for the +spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels.</i></p> + +<p>This is a most sophisticated opinion. Although Ezekiel was describing +only what he saw, he could not help but have some opinions about the +creatures. In verse nineteen he makes it clear that he does not know +whether man is lifting the machine, or the other way around, but here +he makes it clear that whichever, there is no doubt that the creatures +are <i>controlling</i>. They are not being carried off by the will of the +wheel.</p> + + +<p><i>21. When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood; +and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted +up over against them: for the spirit of the living creatures was in +the wheels.</i></p> + +<p>This carries the idea of control one step farther. Not only are the +men controlling the wheels, but they are self-controlled: They are +flying in formation.</p> + + +<p><i>22. And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living +creatures was as the colour of terrible crystal, stretched forth over +their heads above.</i></p> + +<p>Perhaps this verse was moved out of it's original position, for it +returns to the description of the creatures. You may have noticed that +many of the verses are written so that it is in part, an enlargement +of the thought put forward in the preceding verse, and part new +thought, to be enlarged upon in the following verse. Verses twenty-two +and twenty-three <i>seem</i> to go together. Both would fit the rest of the +chapter better if they were between verses twelve and thirteen.</p> + +<p>What is meant by "firmament"? These people had no term for a +hollow-sphere. Most spherical objects were not hollow. They had no +soap, so they had no soap bubbles. The most common thing to compare a +hollow sphere to was the sky, the bowl of the heavens—the firmament. +This crystal-clear bubble was over the heads of the creatures, one on +each creature.</p> + +<p>We will come to the word firmament again, but notice that this is, +"... the <i>likeness</i> of the firmament ...", not the firmament itself. +Later verses speak only of the "firmament".</p> + + +<p><i>23. And under the firmaments were their wings straight, the one +toward the other: every one had two, which covered on this side, and +every one had two which covered on that side, their bodies.</i></p> + +<p>If you changed "... under the firmament ..." to, "... below the sky" +you would get a clearer picture. If you look at the picture of a +house, the roof is, "below the sky," if you start at the top and work +down. If you start at the ground and work up, the roof is, "at the +top" of the house. Ezekiel's description of the wings, which is +continued in this verse, concerns the wings "at the top." They are +(connected), "... one toward the other, about like in figure one."</p> + + +<p><i>24. And when they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the +noise of great waters, like the voice of the Almighty, the voice of +speech, as the noise of the host: when they stood they let down their +wings.</i></p> + +<p>If you have ever stood near a running tip-jet, or any jet engine, I +think you will know what Ezekiel means. The last statement is most +interesting. It seems that when the creatures landed again they +detached the helicopter mechanisms and set them down, as anyone will +with a heavy back-pack who is resting or waiting.</p> + + +<p><i>25. And there was a voice from the firmament that was over their +heads, when they stood, and had let down their wings.</i></p> + +<p>This voice, or sound, was not from the <i>likeness</i> of the firmament, +but from the sky, as they stood there with their wings off.</p> + +<p>This is the end of Ezekiel's attention to the four creatures.</p> + + +<p><i>26. And above the firmament that was over their heads was the +likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone; and upon +the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man +above upon it.</i></p> + +<p>Out of the sky comes a man on a green seat. But a throne is more than +a chair. It is usually associated with a platform. This may be some +kind of flying platform similar to those being tested for the +transporting of infantry.</p> + + +<p><i>27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round +about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and +from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the +appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.</i></p> + +<p>Since this thing was high over their heads, and he saw fire round +about it, the fire may have been on the under side. What he says about +the man is very like what he said about the other four, except that he +describes the man from the waist, up and down, as if he could not see +the area near the man's waist.</p> + + +<p><i>28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of +rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was +the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I +saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one who spake.</i></p> + +<p>What prismatic effect, brighter than the outdoor desert sunshine is +hard to imagine, but a large shining object close at hand would be +pretty terrifying. It seems strange that Ezekiel would not throw +himself upon the ground, after withstanding all he had seen up till +now, but we must remember that a man seated on a throne, a flying +throne at that might have a lot more meaning for him than it would for +you and me. If this object happened to come down closer to him than +the other creatures had, he might well have broken.</p> + +<p>We have now covered every verse of the first chapter quite thoroughly. +Since the Book of Ezekiel contains forty-eight chapters, we might fear +that this is just the beginning of a long and tiring study. +Fortunately or unfortunately this is not the case. The second chapter +begins:</p> + + +<p><i>804.</i></p> + +<p><i>And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon they feet, and I will +speak to thee.</i></p> + +<p><i>2. And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me +upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me.</i></p> + +<p><i>3. And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of +Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and +their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day.</i></p> + +<p>This typically prophetic writing goes on for many pages, telling the +woes and sins of the Israelites. Reference is made in a few places to +the material in the first chapter, but even this dies out before the +end of the book.</p> + +<p>No mention is made again of the living creatures till chapter three +where the following verse is found:</p> + + +<p><i>13. I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that +touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against them, +and a noise of great rushing.</i></p> + +<p>This combines some of the ideas of earlier verses without adding any +new information. Notice that writer has the notion that the wings of +one creature touched those of another, or that the creatures touched +one another.</p> + +<p>This verse is typical of several more scattered throughout the first +third of the book. All the verses mentioning the living creatures +after the first chapter are more dramatic and all fail to continue the +style of a careful reporter. No new ideas are advanced, but some +rather unusual contradictions are introduced, by using several parts +of several verses of Chapter One. Chapter Ten reads like an attempt at +rephrasing Chapter One and Chapter Eleven is the last mention of the +living creatures in the entire book.</p> + +<p>Although it contains no further information on the living creatures, +Chapter Three has a verse that should be mentioned. Verse fifteen +sounds like a fitting conclusion to the first chapter:</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"> +<img src="images/image_004.jpg" width="500" height="370" alt="" title="" /> +</div> + + +<p><i>15. Then I came to them of the captivity at Tel-Abib, that dwelt by +the river Chebar, and I sat where they sat, and remained there +astonished among them for seven days.</i></p> + +<p>Just what do we have? We have a description of four spacesuited and +helicopter-equipped men, getting off of, or out of something that +landed in a cloud of dust or smoke. The four men start their +helicopters, take off and fly to some height. On returning to the +ground they remove their flying gear and wait. They are met by a fifth +man, riding on a flying platform. Such an event would cause some +interest in any community today, but in those times it could only be +interpreted as supernatural—a miracle. The miracle may well be that +the story has been preserved for us, twenty-six centuries later.</p> + +<p>A word for word interpretation is only part of the oddity of this +chapter. Several other aspects are worth pondering. The whole chapter +has a well-worn feeling, as though the author had told and re-told it +many times. It reads like a deposition, taken down by a police +officer, after the witness, who prides himself on truthfulness, has +told the story over and over to his incredulous friends. It has a +certain poetic beauty. It has the style of one who is telling you the +truth, no matter whether you are going to believe it or not. It is +the presentation of a tableau that makes no sense to the man who +witnessed it, or to those to whom he is describing it.</p> + +<p>The product of a man's imagination is tied to his own experience, his +own time. A wonderful tale of the supernatural may sound very +imaginative to the contemporary of the teller, but it will date itself +to a later generation. The lives of the Greek gods are related to the +lives of the early Greeks. An imaginative science-fiction writer such +as Jules Verne is limited in the same way. As good as he was, +experience has set an outer limit to his imagination. Ezekiel's tale +is not in this class. To his contemporaries, it was out of step with +reality. To us it is real enough, but out of step with time. The most +credible explanation is that it really happened.</p> + +<hr style="width: 45%;" /> + +<p>Perhaps there are some points of my interpretation that you do not +agree with, but as a whole the story does hang together rather well. +If you have the feeling that it would be easy to fit the words around +an entirely different set of circumstances, I suggest that you try.</p> + +<p>It is interesting to know that some years ago a verbal battle raged in +theological circles as to whether Ezekiel wrote the Book of Ezekiel. +One school of thought held that he did, while the other school held +that the first chapter was a "forgery," written in the third century +before Christ, and tacked on as a sort of "leader" to Ezekiel's book. +For our purposes it cannot be a forgery. It makes little difference +how long ago it was written, so long as it was not since World War II!</p> + +<p>Suppose Ezekiel or some ancient man actually saw what I have proposed. +What are the possible explanations? Is it possible that some ancient +race, unknown to us, could have developed such equipment? It is not +likely. During the last one hundred years we have been prodding about +in the earth and finding so many ancient records that someone else +besides Ezekiel would certainly have left us a report on them.</p> + +<p>The things that were science fiction twenty years ago are solid fact +now. We know that a landing on the Moon is only a question of time, a +few years at the most. The planets of our Solar System will follow, at +least some before the turn of the century, probably. As for the +planets of neighboring stars we cannot say. We have no way of +exploring them at present, but that is not the same as saying that we +never will. If the past performance of the human race is any measure, +they will likely fall to exploration within two hundred years.</p> + +<p>If you concede that it is possible that we can visit other star +systems in a future not too distant, why then could we not have been +visited some time in the past? It may tend to deflate our ego to think +that there may be intelligent beings not too different from us who are +advanced beyond us. It need not. One of the most striking features of +Ezekiel's story, if it has been decoded correctly, is that these +beings are very much like we are, right at the present time. That puts +them three or four thousand years ahead of us, a very small amount +indeed when we consider the long sweep of human life and development +before the dawn of written history.</p> + +<p>We are so used to stories of "Bug-eyed Monsters" coming to Earth, that +the idea of beings from other worlds looking and acting human seems +fantastic. It should not. There is good sound scientific reason to +believe that there is little chance of it being any other way. Life is +a delicate and fragile thing when compared to cosmic extremes of +temperature and environment in our universe. If life formed on earth +as science now believes that it did, we must have had just the right +size planet at just the right distance from a particular type of star. +While such extremely narrow limits are going to reduce the number of +places in the universe where life can develop, it is also going to +limit the <i>differences</i>. In our creation things operate by rule. The +rule is that in similar circumstance there are similar solutions to a +problem. Man is the solution of the problem of building the highest +form of life on Earth. On a similar planet we can expect to find a +similar solution. This is simply the extension of the theory of +<i>parallel evolution</i> to a cosmic scale.</p> + +<p>If then, we were visited by people from another world, what were they +doing here? Strangely enough, there is considerable evidence of what +they were up to from Ezekiel's own testimony. Let us suppose that +these creatures were very much like we expect to be in five hundred +years. They have come from some other star system in a ship whose +principle of operation is as yet unknown to us. We can assume that it +was a rather large ship, being that there were five beings on board at +once, and we can presume that enough of a crew remained aboard to +return it home in case something happened to the explorers. How would +we proceed in such a case?</p> + +<p>It is not likely that such a large ship would be brought down to the +surface of the earth. After arriving in the neighborhood of the earth, +it would be put into orbit, and the surface of the earth would be +studied through telescopes for days or weeks. The entire radio +spectrum would be scanned to determine if there were inhabitants +below, capable of operating electrical equipment. A small—manned or +unmanned—flyer would be sent down into the upper atmosphere to +determine the level of radioactivity, air components, spore and +bacteria count and radio signals incapable of penetrating the +atmosphere. From the ship the land areas would be mapped and studied. +Any large object on the ground that appeared to be of an artificial +nature would be given particular attention. During the night-time +hours below, these objects and areas would be very carefully observed +for signs of light.</p> + +<p>In the case of our visitors of twenty-six centuries ago, this is what +they would have found: Quite a few artificial works could be seen. +Cultivated fields and large buildings would be easily visible in many +places around the eastern end of the Mediterranean. The Pyramids were +old even then. (The Great Wall in China probably had not been +started.) There would be no radio sounds, except for an occasional +lightning click. We do not know how well their cities were lighted at +night, but they were probably too dim to see. Tiny orange pinpoints of +light from outdoor bonfires could probably be seen around the globe, +but there would be more of them around the Mediterranean and in the +East and Near East than anywhere else. The radioactivity level would +be low. Our visitors would conclude that the inhabitants were either +in the early stages of civilization, or were once highly civilized and +now sunk back to a primitive stage. They would know that this was due +to something other than atomic war.</p> + +<p>We have to conclude that these were moral beings. If the conditions +below were as they seemed to be, that of an early civilization, they +would not want to interfere. They would want to observe without being +observed, so even if it were technically possible they would not want +to bring a large ship down. They would send down as small and +inconspicuous a vehicle as possible.</p> + +<p>We usually picture such a craft as a small version of the larger ship, +or a large—by our standards—rocket, or an aircraft similar to our +Dyna-soar. For people this advanced technologically something a lot +simpler might be used. It might be an open vehicle, similar to our +flying platforms, but with vastly more powerful nuclear power plants. +The men going down would have to wear air-tight suits—spacesuits, and +would have to leave them on all the time they were below, for fear of +becoming infected with molds and viruses that the natives would long +since have become immune to. One man, the pilot, would stay with the +platform while the others did the observing and recording.</p> + +<p>The flying platform would have no need for rapid forward motion, at +least inside the atmosphere and therefore would have little need for +streamlining or protective covering for the passengers, who would +carry their equipment with them. Most of the equipment for the survey +would be built into the suits. They would each carry a set of portable +helicopter attachments so they could cover more ground in a hurry. +Like small helicopters of our time, these probably would have a rather +limited speed and range, but they would be extremely maneuverable.</p> + +<p>The platform on the other hand, being nuclear powered, would probably +be very powerful and have almost unlimited range, but it would be less +maneuverable. The products of its exhaust might be radioactive and +therefore its operators would be reluctant to operate it above or +near the natives of the planet, or places that they frequented.</p> + +<p>As they push away from the mother-ship the spacemen would be in +free-fall and would tend to "float" nearby until they turned the +bottom side of the platform toward the direction of their orbit and +applied power. They would then drop toward the surface, but with +almost unlimited power available they could keep the downward +component of their fall within limits and prevent overheating. They +could probably be on the surface in less than an hour.</p> + +<p>The first and most likely area of exploration would be Egypt. The +platform could be landed a few miles back from the Nile and be in +completely unoccupied desert. The four helicopter-equipped explorers +could put on their rotating-wing backpacks and by keeping low, come up +very close to some center of civilization without being seen. By going +up to a few thousand feet they could observe a fairly large area. Even +if they were spotted, they would be small and unrecognizable, and +cause a minimum amount of excitement.</p> + +<p>Like any tourist in any age they would probably be most interested in +the territory around the pyramids. When they had finished here they +might want to look over the country around what is now Bagdad, but +<i>then</i> only near the capital city of Nebuchadnezzar's empire. This is +about eight hundred miles away, an impractical trip by helicopter, so +they would return to the platform, climb to a few hundred thousand +feet, and scoot over in a few minutes. Here they would land again in +some uninhabited spot and repeat the maneuver. This country was +probably sprinkled with more people than they expected. Maybe that's +why this is the legendary flying carpet country, or maybe not. At any +rate, one lonely military prisoner, working by himself near the banks +of a stream must have seen them. Even if they did notice him, what +possible harm could he do? In the present state of the civilization +who would remember what he said or even believe him? I do.</p> + + +<h3>THE END</h3> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 30252 ***</div> +</body> +</html> diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7dfcb6e --- /dev/null +++ b/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8165d00 --- /dev/null +++ b/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9755dbb --- /dev/null +++ b/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4c60f7e --- /dev/null +++ b/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a6fe1eb --- /dev/null +++ b/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6312041 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements, +metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be +in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES. + +Procedures for determining public domain status are described in +the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org. + +No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in +jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize +this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright +status under the laws that apply to them. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..386ff1a --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for +eBook #30252 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/30252) diff --git a/old/30252-h.zip b/old/30252-h.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..0ae07e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/30252-h.zip diff --git a/old/30252-h/30252-h.htm b/old/30252-h/30252-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8bfe028 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/30252-h/30252-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,1323 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of ... Ezekiel, by Arthur W. Orton + </title> + <style type="text/css"> +/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */ +<!-- +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; background-color: #FFFFFF; +} + + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { + text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ + clear: both; +} + +p { + margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; +} + +hr { + width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; +} + + +.tr {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; margin-top: 5%; margin-bottom: 5%; padding: 2em; background-color: #f6f2f2; color: black; border: dotted black 1px;} + +.blockquot { + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +.f1 { margin-left:40%; font-size:larger; font-weight:bold; } +.center {text-align: center;} + +/* Images */ +.figcenter { + margin: auto; + text-align: center; +} + +.figleft { + float: left; + clear: left; + margin-left: 0; + margin-bottom: 0em; + margin-top: 0.25em; + margin-right: 0.25em; + padding: 0; + text-align: center; +} + + +/* XML end ]]>*/ + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +Project Gutenberg's The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by Arthur W. Orton + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel + +Author: Arthur W. Orton + +Illustrator: Orton + +Release Date: October 14, 2009 [EBook #30252] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FOUR-FACED VISITORS OF EZEKIEL *** + + + + +Produced by Sankar Viswanathan, Greg Weeks, and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + +</pre> + +<div class="tr"><p class="center">Transcriber's Note:</p> +<p class="center">This etext was produced from Analog Science Fact & Fiction March 1961. Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U.S. copyright on this publication was renewed.</p></div> +<p> </p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<img src="images/image_001.jpg" width="400" height="545" alt="" title="" /> +</div> + +<h1>THE<br /> + +FOUR-FACED<br /> + +VISITORS<br /> + +OF ... EZEKIEL</h1> + +<p> </p> +<h2>By ARTHUR W. ORTON</h2> +<p> </p> +<div class="blockquot"><p><i>Ezekiel, they say, "saw de wheel"—but he saw somewhat more +than that. And Orton suggests that what he saw made +perfectly good sense ... to the understanding!</i></p></div> +<p> </p> +<h3>Illustrated by Orton</h3> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<div class="figleft" style="width: 50px;"> +<img src="images/image_w.jpg" width="50" height="50" alt="" title="" /> +</div> +<p>e are told from our Sunday School days that the Bible is a "living +book," the oldest of man's written works that is read and used anew, +from generation to generation. It remains "living" because we are able +to find new meaning to fit our daily lives. Although it is not the +usual kind of new meaning, I believe that I have found something of +the sort in the very old prophesies of Ezekiel.</p> + +<p>Bible scholars have long recognized the first chapter of Ezekiel as a +strange and nearly unfathomable account of a vision. I suggest that it +is strange only because it is written by a man far removed from us in +time and experience, about a subject totally unfamiliar to men of his +time. I do not think that this was a vision in the usual sense, nor +was it meant to be mystical. This particular chapter has been called +"Science fiction in the Bible" and many attempts have been made to +unravel the meaning of the original author, along both spiritual and +mundane lines. I am convinced that this chapter is the account of an +actual happening; the landing of extraterrestial beings, reported by a +careful, truthful and self-possessed observer.</p> + +<p>I am not a student of theology and therefore you may feel that I am +being presumptive in attempting to throw light on a mystery as old and +well-studied as Ezekiel's first chapter. I feel that any success that +I may have in doing so will be due to the accident of my birth at the +very beginning of an era when the events I have to describe are fact, +or are about to become fact.</p> + +<p>If, as I believe, this is an account of an actual encounter with men +from space, I may be better able to interpret the meaning than a +student of theology, who by training and interest, is looking for a +theological meaning. I have worked with mechanical things, and as an +instructor of aircraft mechanics for most of my adult life. During +this time I have had to untangle a lot of mechanical misconceptions +and misunderstandings. I think that this gives me some insight into +this problem.</p> + +<p>If you are not too familiar with the Old Testament, I suggest that you +read through the first chapter of Ezekiel to get the feeling of the +flow of words, and a general idea of what sort of material we will be +covering. If you have done a considerable amount of reading in the +Bible, I am sure you will notice at once how different and +"un-Bible-like" this chapter sounds. It isn't long. The first chapter +covers little more than one page. Don't expect to get a clear picture +the first time through. It seems to have an elusive quality. About the +time you feel that you have hold of a fact, it seems to be +contradicted in a later verse. I am going to try to show you that this +is due to your own preconceived notions of what some of the words and +phrases mean. You, not Ezekiel, are supplying the contradictions.</p> + +<p>You will see that I am not going to make excuses for the words, as +written. It is my belief that those who had the task of translating +the Bible from its original tongue and re-copying it through the ages +were particularly careful of this chapter because they did not +understand it and were afraid of damaging it.</p> + +<p>Let us begin with the first verse of chapter one:</p> + + +<h4><i>The Book of The Prophet</i></h4> +<h3><i>EZEKIEL</i></h3> + +<p>803.<span class="f1">Chapter 1</span></p> + +<p><i>Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in +the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river +of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God.</i></p> + + +<p><i>2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king +Jehoiachin's captivity.</i></p> + + +<p><i>3. The word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the +son of Buzi, in the Land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the +hand of the Lord was there upon him.</i></p> + +<p>This fixes the location of this incident on the outskirts of Bagdad. +The Chebar is sometimes called "The Grand Canal of Bagdad." Although +the entire book was supposed to have been written by Ezekiel, the +second and third verses sound like an editor's note, inserted by a +later writer.</p> + + +<p><i>4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a +great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about +it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the +midst of the fire.</i></p> + +<p>Here is a man who had lived most of his life in arid desert country. +He had probably seen whirlwinds of all kinds, from dust-devils to +full-scale tornadoes. He was an accurate and honest observer, as we +shall see later. If he said it was a whirlwind, it must have really +been one, or at least it looked enough like one to fool him for a +while. Notice that he does not say that it was high in the air, or +that it came out of the sky, but, "... out of the north," or toward +him from the north.</p> + +<p>The first thing that he noticed was that it had fire associated with +it, a strange companion for a whirlwind. There is something strange +about the fire itself. He says that it "infolds itself," which +suggests a fire of more active nature than Ezekiel would be accustomed +to. The association of fire and whirlwind must have struck him as +peculiar.</p> + +<p>Also something amber colored was associated with the cloud and fire. +He said that this color came "out of the midst," which might mean that +it was above the cloud and flame, or appeared as the fire and cloud +subsided, or blew to one side. Considering the detail he gives in +later verses, this is quite vague, as it might be if he saw it from a +distance.</p> + + +<p><i>5. Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living +creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a +man.</i></p> + +<p>Why didn't he say that out came four men? Remember that he is telling +this to very primitive, superstitious people. He was himself bred in a +time when the supernatural was taken for granted. Under these +conditions he has gone about as far as he could by saying that they +certainly looked like four men. He does not say here that he took them +for angels or any other kind of supernatural beings.</p> + + +<p><i>6. And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings.</i></p> + +<p>This short verse is very clear, yet you wonder how a creature with +four faces and four wings could possibly be taken for a man, even by +you or me.</p> + +<p>Although he does not say so, we can imply that these creatures must +have advanced much closer to him after they got out of the fire and +cloud, for him to be able to see so much detail.</p> + +<p>Imagine the courage it took for him to stay put in order to observe +these creatures. Notice also how objective he is, never mentioning his +own feelings.</p> + + +<p><i>7. And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was +like the sole of a calf's foot; and they sparkled like the colour of +burnished brass.</i></p> + +<p>Each verse of the description covers one or two parts of the +creatures. When Ezekiel mentions more than one part it becomes +confusing, so that one verse seems to contradict another. These can +usually be sorted out however. Nowhere will you find a direct +contradiction.</p> + +<p>Here he is describing the feet only. The word "straight" can be taken +several ways. Does he mean <i>regular feet</i>, or feet that point straight +forward, or feet that are straight up and down, like an elephant's? +Probably he means regular, forward-pointing feet because he does not +dwell on the point. In other places he leans heavily on simile to +describe some unusual feature of the beings.</p> + +<p>The sole of the foot sounds as if it was heavily cleated. What then +has he described in this verse? For a person living in a warm climate +who had never seen any footwear more complicated than a sandal, he has +described a highly polished leather, plastic or metal boot very well.</p> + + +<p><i>8. And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four +sides; and they four had their faces and their wings.</i></p> + +<p>Notice carefully that he is <i>not</i> saying that each creature had four +man-like hands, one on each of four sides. He is saying that each has +the normal number of hands and they are located <i>below</i> their wings. +Remember that he was a careful observer and he had probably noticed +that birds have wings <i>instead</i> of arms. These had both. In addition, +he has given us another bit of information about the distribution of +the wings. They do not appear to be arranged like a biplane, but each +wing is at a ninety-degree angle from its neighboring wing like a +helicopter.</p> + +<p>Ezekiel must have been something of a numerologist. He points out that +there are four creatures, and each of the four has four faces each, +and each has four wings each—but not four hands.</p> + + +<p><i>9. Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they +went; they went every one straight forward.</i></p> + +<p>He is not saying that the wings of one creature are joined to the +wings of another creature. He is saying that each wing is joined to +another wing, not directly to the creature.</p> + +<p>The second and third parts of this verse present a mystery. We do not +know what the "theys" refer to. There are three "theys" in this verse, +one after another and we are given very few clues to which refer to +<i>creatures</i> and which refer to wings. The first "they" most likely is +tied to the first part of the verse and therefore refers to the wings. +Given this, there are still three interpretations:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>1. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The wings</i> +went every one straight forward.</p> + +<p>2. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; <i>The +wings</i> went every one straight forward.</p> + +<p>3. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; <i>The +creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p></div> + +<p>None of these three statements make much of a point, whether the +creatures have helicopter wings, or bird-angel wings. Let us assume +then that the first "they" refers to the creatures:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>1. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; +<i>The creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p> + +<p>2. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The +wings</i> went every one straight forward.</p> + +<p>3. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The +creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p></div> + +<p>This last statement would pretty well describe the action of the +blades of an inoperative helicopter being carried forward in a +straight line. It would strike Ezekiel as odd that the wings might +move and turn without turning the men under them. You might wonder why +he would say "... wings went ..." instead of "... wings turned...." +When a light breeze moves the blades of an inoperative helicopter the +blades not only turn, but they change their pitch and plane in a most +random manner.</p> + +<p>Although Ezekiel has not completed his description of the creatures, +we can try now to form a picture of what he saw. No matter how we bend +and squeeze, we are not going to get a Michelangelo-type angel. Look +at figure one. Go back over the points that Ezekiel has described. You +will see that it fits quite well.</p> + + +<p><i>10. As for the likeness of the faces, they four had the face of a +man, and the face of a lion, on the right side; and they four had the +face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an +eagle.</i></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<img src="images/image_002.jpg" width="400" height="337" alt="" title="" /> +</div> + +<p>This again does not sound very man-like. You wonder what could have +kept him from pronouncing them demons. If you will study figure two, +you will see what Ezekiel described. Now look at figure three. How +much better could a man living six centuries before Christ describe +figure three?</p> + + +<p><i>11. Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; Two +wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their +bodies.</i></p> + +<p>See figure one again. The arrangement is like he describes. Notice +that when he talks about "... the wings ..." of one creature, he +apparently means the whole system of wings and attachments.</p> + + +<p><i>12. And they went every one straight forward: wither the spirit was +to go, they went; and they turned not as they went.</i></p> + +<p>Again we have trouble with the "theys." Notice however, that the first +part of this verse repeats the last part of verse nine. If we were +right in that verse, the first "they" in this refers to the creatures +again. The second part of this verse contains a new idea, "whither the +spirit was to go ...", has an opposite meaning from "... they went +... straight forward ..." and, "... they turned not when they went." +The first and last part sounds like the four creatures were marching +purposefully in one direction. If then the second or middle part +refers to the wings, we could read it:</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"And <i>the creatures</i> went every one straight forward: +whither the spirit was to go, <i>the wings</i> went; and <i>the +creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went."</p></div> + +<p>Again we have a picture of four men walking with their inoperative +helicopters moving in several different ways as the breeze and the +men's motions cause them to move slightly.</p> + +<p>Notice that Ezekiel seems to be more impressed with the wings and +their motion than with any other feature of what he witnessed.</p> + + +<p><i>13. As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was +like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went +up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and +out of the fire went forth lightning.</i></p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;"> +<img src="images/image_003.jpg" width="400" height="338" alt="" title="" /> +</div> + +<p>Here he is describing their over-all appearance. We can assume that +creatures that look like men but has a surface that resembles lights, +coals and fire must be wearing suits with a brightly colored metallic +surface. The modern anodized aluminium coatings glisten and sparkle +with an effect like he describes. If these are space-suits, there is a +good reason for making them gaudy. If they were worn in space while +working on and around a ship, they should be as bright and +eye-catching as possible, in the case the man became detached and +floated away. He would be quite visible against the blackness of +space.</p> + + +<p><i>14. And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a +flash of lightning.</i></p> + +<p>This might mean that they moved swiftly, but more than likely it means +that they sparkled and shined on all sides, and this was visible as +they moved about.</p> + +<p>This ends the description for a while. There are two later verses of +description, but we will take this when we come to it. It is +surprising that Ezekiel has organized his material so well. It reads +like a scientific report. If he had headed the section that we just +covered, "Description," we would not have been too surprised to find +the following section headed, "Action":</p> + + +<p><i>15. Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the +earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.</i></p> + +<p>If we read Ezekiel correctly and the creatures did have helicopter +attachments on their backs, we can assume that one of them now +started his helicopter, which would appear as a "wheel" to Ezekiel, +and probably surprised him greatly.</p> + + +<p><i>16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the +colour of Beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance +and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.</i></p> + +<p>Here we must digress in order to put ourselves into the life and time +of this man because he has mentioned the wheel. A wheel did not have +quite the same meaning for him as it does for you and I, living in a +mechanical age. The wheel in 600 B.C. in the area around the eastern +end of the Mediterranean, the most civilized part of the world at that +time, had only a few very limited uses.</p> + +<p>One use, old even in Ezekiel's time was the potter's wheel; a simple +platform mounted on crude vertical bearings so that it could be turned +with one hand while the clay was worked with the other. From this the +grindstone and the lapidary wheel developed for working metal and +stone. These early machines probably employed some form of foot +treadle but even these could not turn the wheel very fast. If the +stone had a large enough diameter, it was possible to get the speed at +the outer edge high enough to produce sparks when grinding hard +material. The "work" took place at some distance from the axis, +usually at the edge of the stone.</p> + +<p>The wheel we usually associate with ancient times is the cart wheel. +In its earliest form it was a solid wheel, like those still in use in +primitive sections of Mexico. Even with the cart wheel, ancient man +would associate the edge of the wheel with the "work" of the wheel. +This was the part that left a track in the mud and dust, crushed an +occasional rock and fractured an occasional toe.</p> + +<p>In order to increase the efficiency of military chariots it was +necessary to build a wheel that was lighter, yet just as strong as the +solid model. This was first done by cutting out "lightening holes" +between the hub and rim. Pressing this invention to the ultimate +produced a spoked wheel. The Egyptians used a six-spoked chariot wheel +thousands of years before Ezekiel's time, and the Greeks and others +had four-spoke models. This was quite an invention and in addition to +its useful aspects, it produced some rather unusual, even magical +side-effects. As every child knows, if you turn your tricycle +upside-down and spin the wheel, the spokes seem to vanish. All that +can be seen is the rim and the parts of the hub near the center of +rotation. No matter what shape the hub actually is, it too looks round +like a wheel. It is very likely that such an effect was referred to as +"a wheel within a wheel."</p> + +<p>In verse 16 Ezekiel says that, "wheels and their work was the colour +of beryl ...", a blue-green color. This sounds like the emphasis is on +the color at the <i>edge</i> of the wheel. This could be from a flame +coming from jets on the tips of the rotors.</p> + +<p>All of the creatures must have started their rotors. ("... they four +had one likeness.") They looked like "... a wheel in the middle of a +wheel." Or the spinning spokes of a wheel. Notice also that he never +mentions "wings" and "wheels" at the same time, for when one appears +the other vanishes.</p> + + +<p><i>17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned +not when they went.</i></p> + +<p>If four men were standing fairly close together on the ground with +running helicopters, they would tend to spread out as they left the +ground, so as to not run into each other. Moreover, with a helicopter, +it is not necessary to <i>face</i> the direction you intend to go. This +sounds like four men lifting off the ground, spreading out slightly +and starting up and away, in formation.</p> + + +<p><i>18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; +and their rings were full of eyes round about them four.</i></p> + +<p>The four creatures are now high in the air above Ezekiel, a dreadful +and awe-inspiring sight for a man of Ezekiel's time. Their "rings" +obviously are the flames from their tip-jets, seen from below—the +only part of the wheel now visible from far below. And the rings +<i>would</i> be full of eyes. When a jet or rocket motor is operating there +is a shock wave generated in the tailpipe which tends to cut the +exhaust gas into segments. Time exposures of jet aircraft at night +often show this. When a tip-jet is operating, these bright, evenly +spaced spots give it the appearance of a string of pearls, "... full +of eyes round about them...."</p> + + +<p><i>19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went up by them: +and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the +wheels were lifted up.</i></p> + +<p>Ezekiel makes it clear that he does not know whether the men are +lifting the wheels or the wheels lifting the men, but both went up +together.</p> + + +<p><i>20. Withersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their +spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted over against them: for the +spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels.</i></p> + +<p>This is a most sophisticated opinion. Although Ezekiel was describing +only what he saw, he could not help but have some opinions about the +creatures. In verse nineteen he makes it clear that he does not know +whether man is lifting the machine, or the other way around, but here +he makes it clear that whichever, there is no doubt that the creatures +are <i>controlling</i>. They are not being carried off by the will of the +wheel.</p> + + +<p><i>21. When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood; +and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted +up over against them: for the spirit of the living creatures was in +the wheels.</i></p> + +<p>This carries the idea of control one step farther. Not only are the +men controlling the wheels, but they are self-controlled: They are +flying in formation.</p> + + +<p><i>22. And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living +creatures was as the colour of terrible crystal, stretched forth over +their heads above.</i></p> + +<p>Perhaps this verse was moved out of it's original position, for it +returns to the description of the creatures. You may have noticed that +many of the verses are written so that it is in part, an enlargement +of the thought put forward in the preceding verse, and part new +thought, to be enlarged upon in the following verse. Verses twenty-two +and twenty-three <i>seem</i> to go together. Both would fit the rest of the +chapter better if they were between verses twelve and thirteen.</p> + +<p>What is meant by "firmament"? These people had no term for a +hollow-sphere. Most spherical objects were not hollow. They had no +soap, so they had no soap bubbles. The most common thing to compare a +hollow sphere to was the sky, the bowl of the heavens—the firmament. +This crystal-clear bubble was over the heads of the creatures, one on +each creature.</p> + +<p>We will come to the word firmament again, but notice that this is, +"... the <i>likeness</i> of the firmament ...", not the firmament itself. +Later verses speak only of the "firmament".</p> + + +<p><i>23. And under the firmaments were their wings straight, the one +toward the other: every one had two, which covered on this side, and +every one had two which covered on that side, their bodies.</i></p> + +<p>If you changed "... under the firmament ..." to, "... below the sky" +you would get a clearer picture. If you look at the picture of a +house, the roof is, "below the sky," if you start at the top and work +down. If you start at the ground and work up, the roof is, "at the +top" of the house. Ezekiel's description of the wings, which is +continued in this verse, concerns the wings "at the top." They are +(connected), "... one toward the other, about like in figure one."</p> + + +<p><i>24. And when they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the +noise of great waters, like the voice of the Almighty, the voice of +speech, as the noise of the host: when they stood they let down their +wings.</i></p> + +<p>If you have ever stood near a running tip-jet, or any jet engine, I +think you will know what Ezekiel means. The last statement is most +interesting. It seems that when the creatures landed again they +detached the helicopter mechanisms and set them down, as anyone will +with a heavy back-pack who is resting or waiting.</p> + + +<p><i>25. And there was a voice from the firmament that was over their +heads, when they stood, and had let down their wings.</i></p> + +<p>This voice, or sound, was not from the <i>likeness</i> of the firmament, +but from the sky, as they stood there with their wings off.</p> + +<p>This is the end of Ezekiel's attention to the four creatures.</p> + + +<p><i>26. And above the firmament that was over their heads was the +likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone; and upon +the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man +above upon it.</i></p> + +<p>Out of the sky comes a man on a green seat. But a throne is more than +a chair. It is usually associated with a platform. This may be some +kind of flying platform similar to those being tested for the +transporting of infantry.</p> + + +<p><i>27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round +about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and +from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the +appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.</i></p> + +<p>Since this thing was high over their heads, and he saw fire round +about it, the fire may have been on the under side. What he says about +the man is very like what he said about the other four, except that he +describes the man from the waist, up and down, as if he could not see +the area near the man's waist.</p> + + +<p><i>28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of +rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was +the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I +saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one who spake.</i></p> + +<p>What prismatic effect, brighter than the outdoor desert sunshine is +hard to imagine, but a large shining object close at hand would be +pretty terrifying. It seems strange that Ezekiel would not throw +himself upon the ground, after withstanding all he had seen up till +now, but we must remember that a man seated on a throne, a flying +throne at that might have a lot more meaning for him than it would for +you and me. If this object happened to come down closer to him than +the other creatures had, he might well have broken.</p> + +<p>We have now covered every verse of the first chapter quite thoroughly. +Since the Book of Ezekiel contains forty-eight chapters, we might fear +that this is just the beginning of a long and tiring study. +Fortunately or unfortunately this is not the case. The second chapter +begins:</p> + + +<p><i>804.</i></p> + +<p><i>And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon they feet, and I will +speak to thee.</i></p> + +<p><i>2. And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me +upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me.</i></p> + +<p><i>3. And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of +Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and +their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day.</i></p> + +<p>This typically prophetic writing goes on for many pages, telling the +woes and sins of the Israelites. Reference is made in a few places to +the material in the first chapter, but even this dies out before the +end of the book.</p> + +<p>No mention is made again of the living creatures till chapter three +where the following verse is found:</p> + + +<p><i>13. I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that +touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against them, +and a noise of great rushing.</i></p> + +<p>This combines some of the ideas of earlier verses without adding any +new information. Notice that writer has the notion that the wings of +one creature touched those of another, or that the creatures touched +one another.</p> + +<p>This verse is typical of several more scattered throughout the first +third of the book. All the verses mentioning the living creatures +after the first chapter are more dramatic and all fail to continue the +style of a careful reporter. No new ideas are advanced, but some +rather unusual contradictions are introduced, by using several parts +of several verses of Chapter One. Chapter Ten reads like an attempt at +rephrasing Chapter One and Chapter Eleven is the last mention of the +living creatures in the entire book.</p> + +<p>Although it contains no further information on the living creatures, +Chapter Three has a verse that should be mentioned. Verse fifteen +sounds like a fitting conclusion to the first chapter:</p> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;"> +<img src="images/image_004.jpg" width="500" height="370" alt="" title="" /> +</div> + + +<p><i>15. Then I came to them of the captivity at Tel-Abib, that dwelt by +the river Chebar, and I sat where they sat, and remained there +astonished among them for seven days.</i></p> + +<p>Just what do we have? We have a description of four spacesuited and +helicopter-equipped men, getting off of, or out of something that +landed in a cloud of dust or smoke. The four men start their +helicopters, take off and fly to some height. On returning to the +ground they remove their flying gear and wait. They are met by a fifth +man, riding on a flying platform. Such an event would cause some +interest in any community today, but in those times it could only be +interpreted as supernatural—a miracle. The miracle may well be that +the story has been preserved for us, twenty-six centuries later.</p> + +<p>A word for word interpretation is only part of the oddity of this +chapter. Several other aspects are worth pondering. The whole chapter +has a well-worn feeling, as though the author had told and re-told it +many times. It reads like a deposition, taken down by a police +officer, after the witness, who prides himself on truthfulness, has +told the story over and over to his incredulous friends. It has a +certain poetic beauty. It has the style of one who is telling you the +truth, no matter whether you are going to believe it or not. It is +the presentation of a tableau that makes no sense to the man who +witnessed it, or to those to whom he is describing it.</p> + +<p>The product of a man's imagination is tied to his own experience, his +own time. A wonderful tale of the supernatural may sound very +imaginative to the contemporary of the teller, but it will date itself +to a later generation. The lives of the Greek gods are related to the +lives of the early Greeks. An imaginative science-fiction writer such +as Jules Verne is limited in the same way. As good as he was, +experience has set an outer limit to his imagination. Ezekiel's tale +is not in this class. To his contemporaries, it was out of step with +reality. To us it is real enough, but out of step with time. The most +credible explanation is that it really happened.</p> + +<hr style="width: 45%;" /> + +<p>Perhaps there are some points of my interpretation that you do not +agree with, but as a whole the story does hang together rather well. +If you have the feeling that it would be easy to fit the words around +an entirely different set of circumstances, I suggest that you try.</p> + +<p>It is interesting to know that some years ago a verbal battle raged in +theological circles as to whether Ezekiel wrote the Book of Ezekiel. +One school of thought held that he did, while the other school held +that the first chapter was a "forgery," written in the third century +before Christ, and tacked on as a sort of "leader" to Ezekiel's book. +For our purposes it cannot be a forgery. It makes little difference +how long ago it was written, so long as it was not since World War II!</p> + +<p>Suppose Ezekiel or some ancient man actually saw what I have proposed. +What are the possible explanations? Is it possible that some ancient +race, unknown to us, could have developed such equipment? It is not +likely. During the last one hundred years we have been prodding about +in the earth and finding so many ancient records that someone else +besides Ezekiel would certainly have left us a report on them.</p> + +<p>The things that were science fiction twenty years ago are solid fact +now. We know that a landing on the Moon is only a question of time, a +few years at the most. The planets of our Solar System will follow, at +least some before the turn of the century, probably. As for the +planets of neighboring stars we cannot say. We have no way of +exploring them at present, but that is not the same as saying that we +never will. If the past performance of the human race is any measure, +they will likely fall to exploration within two hundred years.</p> + +<p>If you concede that it is possible that we can visit other star +systems in a future not too distant, why then could we not have been +visited some time in the past? It may tend to deflate our ego to think +that there may be intelligent beings not too different from us who are +advanced beyond us. It need not. One of the most striking features of +Ezekiel's story, if it has been decoded correctly, is that these +beings are very much like we are, right at the present time. That puts +them three or four thousand years ahead of us, a very small amount +indeed when we consider the long sweep of human life and development +before the dawn of written history.</p> + +<p>We are so used to stories of "Bug-eyed Monsters" coming to Earth, that +the idea of beings from other worlds looking and acting human seems +fantastic. It should not. There is good sound scientific reason to +believe that there is little chance of it being any other way. Life is +a delicate and fragile thing when compared to cosmic extremes of +temperature and environment in our universe. If life formed on earth +as science now believes that it did, we must have had just the right +size planet at just the right distance from a particular type of star. +While such extremely narrow limits are going to reduce the number of +places in the universe where life can develop, it is also going to +limit the <i>differences</i>. In our creation things operate by rule. The +rule is that in similar circumstance there are similar solutions to a +problem. Man is the solution of the problem of building the highest +form of life on Earth. On a similar planet we can expect to find a +similar solution. This is simply the extension of the theory of +<i>parallel evolution</i> to a cosmic scale.</p> + +<p>If then, we were visited by people from another world, what were they +doing here? Strangely enough, there is considerable evidence of what +they were up to from Ezekiel's own testimony. Let us suppose that +these creatures were very much like we expect to be in five hundred +years. They have come from some other star system in a ship whose +principle of operation is as yet unknown to us. We can assume that it +was a rather large ship, being that there were five beings on board at +once, and we can presume that enough of a crew remained aboard to +return it home in case something happened to the explorers. How would +we proceed in such a case?</p> + +<p>It is not likely that such a large ship would be brought down to the +surface of the earth. After arriving in the neighborhood of the earth, +it would be put into orbit, and the surface of the earth would be +studied through telescopes for days or weeks. The entire radio +spectrum would be scanned to determine if there were inhabitants +below, capable of operating electrical equipment. A small—manned or +unmanned—flyer would be sent down into the upper atmosphere to +determine the level of radioactivity, air components, spore and +bacteria count and radio signals incapable of penetrating the +atmosphere. From the ship the land areas would be mapped and studied. +Any large object on the ground that appeared to be of an artificial +nature would be given particular attention. During the night-time +hours below, these objects and areas would be very carefully observed +for signs of light.</p> + +<p>In the case of our visitors of twenty-six centuries ago, this is what +they would have found: Quite a few artificial works could be seen. +Cultivated fields and large buildings would be easily visible in many +places around the eastern end of the Mediterranean. The Pyramids were +old even then. (The Great Wall in China probably had not been +started.) There would be no radio sounds, except for an occasional +lightning click. We do not know how well their cities were lighted at +night, but they were probably too dim to see. Tiny orange pinpoints of +light from outdoor bonfires could probably be seen around the globe, +but there would be more of them around the Mediterranean and in the +East and Near East than anywhere else. The radioactivity level would +be low. Our visitors would conclude that the inhabitants were either +in the early stages of civilization, or were once highly civilized and +now sunk back to a primitive stage. They would know that this was due +to something other than atomic war.</p> + +<p>We have to conclude that these were moral beings. If the conditions +below were as they seemed to be, that of an early civilization, they +would not want to interfere. They would want to observe without being +observed, so even if it were technically possible they would not want +to bring a large ship down. They would send down as small and +inconspicuous a vehicle as possible.</p> + +<p>We usually picture such a craft as a small version of the larger ship, +or a large—by our standards—rocket, or an aircraft similar to our +Dyna-soar. For people this advanced technologically something a lot +simpler might be used. It might be an open vehicle, similar to our +flying platforms, but with vastly more powerful nuclear power plants. +The men going down would have to wear air-tight suits—spacesuits, and +would have to leave them on all the time they were below, for fear of +becoming infected with molds and viruses that the natives would long +since have become immune to. One man, the pilot, would stay with the +platform while the others did the observing and recording.</p> + +<p>The flying platform would have no need for rapid forward motion, at +least inside the atmosphere and therefore would have little need for +streamlining or protective covering for the passengers, who would +carry their equipment with them. Most of the equipment for the survey +would be built into the suits. They would each carry a set of portable +helicopter attachments so they could cover more ground in a hurry. +Like small helicopters of our time, these probably would have a rather +limited speed and range, but they would be extremely maneuverable.</p> + +<p>The platform on the other hand, being nuclear powered, would probably +be very powerful and have almost unlimited range, but it would be less +maneuverable. The products of its exhaust might be radioactive and +therefore its operators would be reluctant to operate it above or +near the natives of the planet, or places that they frequented.</p> + +<p>As they push away from the mother-ship the spacemen would be in +free-fall and would tend to "float" nearby until they turned the +bottom side of the platform toward the direction of their orbit and +applied power. They would then drop toward the surface, but with +almost unlimited power available they could keep the downward +component of their fall within limits and prevent overheating. They +could probably be on the surface in less than an hour.</p> + +<p>The first and most likely area of exploration would be Egypt. The +platform could be landed a few miles back from the Nile and be in +completely unoccupied desert. The four helicopter-equipped explorers +could put on their rotating-wing backpacks and by keeping low, come up +very close to some center of civilization without being seen. By going +up to a few thousand feet they could observe a fairly large area. Even +if they were spotted, they would be small and unrecognizable, and +cause a minimum amount of excitement.</p> + +<p>Like any tourist in any age they would probably be most interested in +the territory around the pyramids. When they had finished here they +might want to look over the country around what is now Bagdad, but +<i>then</i> only near the capital city of Nebuchadnezzar's empire. This is +about eight hundred miles away, an impractical trip by helicopter, so +they would return to the platform, climb to a few hundred thousand +feet, and scoot over in a few minutes. Here they would land again in +some uninhabited spot and repeat the maneuver. This country was +probably sprinkled with more people than they expected. Maybe that's +why this is the legendary flying carpet country, or maybe not. At any +rate, one lonely military prisoner, working by himself near the banks +of a stream must have seen them. Even if they did notice him, what +possible harm could he do? In the present state of the civilization +who would remember what he said or even believe him? I do.</p> + + +<h3>THE END</h3> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by +Arthur W. Orton + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FOUR-FACED VISITORS OF EZEKIEL *** + +***** This file should be named 30252-h.htm or 30252-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/0/2/5/30252/ + +Produced by Sankar Viswanathan, Greg Weeks, and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..7dfcb6e --- /dev/null +++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..8165d00 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..9755dbb --- /dev/null +++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..4c60f7e --- /dev/null +++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a6fe1eb --- /dev/null +++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg diff --git a/old/30252.txt b/old/30252.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b868839 --- /dev/null +++ b/old/30252.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1230 @@ +Project Gutenberg's The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by Arthur W. Orton + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel + +Author: Arthur W. Orton + +Illustrator: Orton + +Release Date: October 14, 2009 [EBook #30252] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ASCII + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FOUR-FACED VISITORS OF EZEKIEL *** + + + + +Produced by Sankar Viswanathan, Greg Weeks, and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + + + + + + + Transcriber's Note: + + This etext was produced from Analog Science Fact & Fiction March 1961. + Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U.S. copyright + on this publication was renewed. + + + + THE + + FOUR-FACED + + VISITORS + + OF ... EZEKIEL + + + + + By ARTHUR W. ORTON + + + + _Ezekiel, they say, "saw de wheel"--but he saw somewhat more + than that. And Orton suggests that what he saw made + perfectly good sense ... to the understanding!_ + + + + Illustrated by Orton + + * * * * * + + + + +We are told from our Sunday School days that the Bible is a "living +book," the oldest of man's written works that is read and used anew, +from generation to generation. It remains "living" because we are able +to find new meaning to fit our daily lives. Although it is not the +usual kind of new meaning, I believe that I have found something of +the sort in the very old prophesies of Ezekiel. + +Bible scholars have long recognized the first chapter of Ezekiel as a +strange and nearly unfathomable account of a vision. I suggest that it +is strange only because it is written by a man far removed from us in +time and experience, about a subject totally unfamiliar to men of his +time. I do not think that this was a vision in the usual sense, nor +was it meant to be mystical. This particular chapter has been called +"Science fiction in the Bible" and many attempts have been made to +unravel the meaning of the original author, along both spiritual and +mundane lines. I am convinced that this chapter is the account of an +actual happening; the landing of extraterrestial beings, reported by a +careful, truthful and self-possessed observer. + +I am not a student of theology and therefore you may feel that I am +being presumptive in attempting to throw light on a mystery as old and +well-studied as Ezekiel's first chapter. I feel that any success that +I may have in doing so will be due to the accident of my birth at the +very beginning of an era when the events I have to describe are fact, +or are about to become fact. + +If, as I believe, this is an account of an actual encounter with men +from space, I may be better able to interpret the meaning than a +student of theology, who by training and interest, is looking for a +theological meaning. I have worked with mechanical things, and as an +instructor of aircraft mechanics for most of my adult life. During +this time I have had to untangle a lot of mechanical misconceptions +and misunderstandings. I think that this gives me some insight into +this problem. + +If you are not too familiar with the Old Testament, I suggest that you +read through the first chapter of Ezekiel to get the feeling of the +flow of words, and a general idea of what sort of material we will be +covering. If you have done a considerable amount of reading in the +Bible, I am sure you will notice at once how different and +"un-Bible-like" this chapter sounds. It isn't long. The first chapter +covers little more than one page. Don't expect to get a clear picture +the first time through. It seems to have an elusive quality. About the +time you feel that you have hold of a fact, it seems to be +contradicted in a later verse. I am going to try to show you that this +is due to your own preconceived notions of what some of the words and +phrases mean. You, not Ezekiel, are supplying the contradictions. + +You will see that I am not going to make excuses for the words, as +written. It is my belief that those who had the task of translating +the Bible from its original tongue and re-copying it through the ages +were particularly careful of this chapter because they did not +understand it and were afraid of damaging it. + +Let us begin with the first verse of chapter one: + + +_The Book of The Prophet EZEKIEL_ + + +803. Chapter 1 + + +_Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in +the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river +of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God._ + + +_2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king +Jehoiachin's captivity._ + + +_3. The word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the +son of Buzi, in the Land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the +hand of the Lord was there upon him._ + +This fixes the location of this incident on the outskirts of Bagdad. +The Chebar is sometimes called "The Grand Canal of Bagdad." Although +the entire book was supposed to have been written by Ezekiel, the +second and third verses sound like an editor's note, inserted by a +later writer. + + +_4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a +great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about +it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the +midst of the fire._ + +Here is a man who had lived most of his life in arid desert country. +He had probably seen whirlwinds of all kinds, from dust-devils to +full-scale tornadoes. He was an accurate and honest observer, as we +shall see later. If he said it was a whirlwind, it must have really +been one, or at least it looked enough like one to fool him for a +while. Notice that he does not say that it was high in the air, or +that it came out of the sky, but, "... out of the north," or toward +him from the north. + +The first thing that he noticed was that it had fire associated with +it, a strange companion for a whirlwind. There is something strange +about the fire itself. He says that it "infolds itself," which +suggests a fire of more active nature than Ezekiel would be accustomed +to. The association of fire and whirlwind must have struck him as +peculiar. + +Also something amber colored was associated with the cloud and fire. +He said that this color came "out of the midst," which might mean that +it was above the cloud and flame, or appeared as the fire and cloud +subsided, or blew to one side. Considering the detail he gives in +later verses, this is quite vague, as it might be if he saw it from a +distance. + + +_5. Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living +creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a +man._ + +Why didn't he say that out came four men? Remember that he is telling +this to very primitive, superstitious people. He was himself bred in a +time when the supernatural was taken for granted. Under these +conditions he has gone about as far as he could by saying that they +certainly looked like four men. He does not say here that he took them +for angels or any other kind of supernatural beings. + + +_6. And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings._ + +This short verse is very clear, yet you wonder how a creature with +four faces and four wings could possibly be taken for a man, even by +you or me. + +Although he does not say so, we can imply that these creatures must +have advanced much closer to him after they got out of the fire and +cloud, for him to be able to see so much detail. + +Imagine the courage it took for him to stay put in order to observe +these creatures. Notice also how objective he is, never mentioning his +own feelings. + + +_7. And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was +like the sole of a calf's foot; and they sparkled like the colour of +burnished brass._ + +Each verse of the description covers one or two parts of the +creatures. When Ezekiel mentions more than one part it becomes +confusing, so that one verse seems to contradict another. These can +usually be sorted out however. Nowhere will you find a direct +contradiction. + +Here he is describing the feet only. The word "straight" can be taken +several ways. Does he mean _regular feet_, or feet that point straight +forward, or feet that are straight up and down, like an elephant's? +Probably he means regular, forward-pointing feet because he does not +dwell on the point. In other places he leans heavily on simile to +describe some unusual feature of the beings. + +The sole of the foot sounds as if it was heavily cleated. What then +has he described in this verse? For a person living in a warm climate +who had never seen any footwear more complicated than a sandal, he has +described a highly polished leather, plastic or metal boot very well. + + +_8. And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four +sides; and they four had their faces and their wings._ + +Notice carefully that he is _not_ saying that each creature had four +man-like hands, one on each of four sides. He is saying that each has +the normal number of hands and they are located _below_ their wings. +Remember that he was a careful observer and he had probably noticed +that birds have wings _instead_ of arms. These had both. In addition, +he has given us another bit of information about the distribution of +the wings. They do not appear to be arranged like a biplane, but each +wing is at a ninety-degree angle from its neighboring wing like a +helicopter. + +Ezekiel must have been something of a numerologist. He points out that +there are four creatures, and each of the four has four faces each, +and each has four wings each--but not four hands. + + +_9. Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they +went; they went every one straight forward._ + +He is not saying that the wings of one creature are joined to the +wings of another creature. He is saying that each wing is joined to +another wing, not directly to the creature. + +The second and third parts of this verse present a mystery. We do not +know what the "theys" refer to. There are three "theys" in this verse, +one after another and we are given very few clues to which refer to +_creatures_ and which refer to wings. The first "they" most likely is +tied to the first part of the verse and therefore refers to the wings. +Given this, there are still three interpretations: + + 1. _The wings_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The wings_ + went every one straight forward. + + 2. _The wings_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; _The + wings_ went every one straight forward. + + 3. _The wings_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; _The + creatures_ went every one straight forward. + +None of these three statements make much of a point, whether the +creatures have helicopter wings, or bird-angel wings. Let us assume +then that the first "they" refers to the creatures: + + 1. _The creatures_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; + _The creatures_ went every one straight forward. + + 2. _The creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The + wings_ went every one straight forward. + + 3. _The creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The + creatures_ went every one straight forward. + +This last statement would pretty well describe the action of the +blades of an inoperative helicopter being carried forward in a +straight line. It would strike Ezekiel as odd that the wings might +move and turn without turning the men under them. You might wonder why +he would say "... wings went ..." instead of "... wings turned...." +When a light breeze moves the blades of an inoperative helicopter the +blades not only turn, but they change their pitch and plane in a most +random manner. + +Although Ezekiel has not completed his description of the creatures, +we can try now to form a picture of what he saw. No matter how we bend +and squeeze, we are not going to get a Michelangelo-type angel. Look +at figure one. Go back over the points that Ezekiel has described. You +will see that it fits quite well. + + +_10. As for the likeness of the faces, they four had the face of a +man, and the face of a lion, on the right side; and they four had the +face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an +eagle._ + +[Illustration] + +This again does not sound very man-like. You wonder what could have +kept him from pronouncing them demons. If you will study figure two, +you will see what Ezekiel described. Now look at figure three. How +much better could a man living six centuries before Christ describe +figure three? + + +_11. Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; Two +wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their +bodies._ + +See figure one again. The arrangement is like he describes. Notice +that when he talks about "... the wings ..." of one creature, he +apparently means the whole system of wings and attachments. + + +_12. And they went every one straight forward: wither the spirit was +to go, they went; and they turned not as they went._ + +Again we have trouble with the "theys." Notice however, that the first part +of this verse repeats the last part of verse nine. If we were right in that +verse, the first "they" in this refers to the creatures again. The second +part of this verse contains a new idea, "whither the spirit was to go ...", +has an opposite meaning from "... they went ... straight forward ..." +and, "... they turned not when they went." The first and last part sounds +like the four creatures were marching purposefully in one direction. If +then the second or middle part refers to the wings, we could read it: + + "And _the creatures_ went every one straight forward: + whither the spirit was to go, _the wings_ went; and _the + creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went." + +Again we have a picture of four men walking with their inoperative +helicopters moving in several different ways as the breeze and the +men's motions cause them to move slightly. + +Notice that Ezekiel seems to be more impressed with the wings and +their motion than with any other feature of what he witnessed. + + +_13. As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was +like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went +up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and +out of the fire went forth lightning._ + +[Illustration] + +Here he is describing their over-all appearance. We can assume that +creatures that look like men but has a surface that resembles lights, +coals and fire must be wearing suits with a brightly colored metallic +surface. The modern anodized aluminium coatings glisten and sparkle +with an effect like he describes. If these are space-suits, there is a +good reason for making them gaudy. If they were worn in space while +working on and around a ship, they should be as bright and +eye-catching as possible, in the case the man became detached and +floated away. He would be quite visible against the blackness of +space. + + +_14. And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a +flash of lightning._ + +This might mean that they moved swiftly, but more than likely it means +that they sparkled and shined on all sides, and this was visible as +they moved about. + +This ends the description for a while. There are two later verses of +description, but we will take this when we come to it. It is +surprising that Ezekiel has organized his material so well. It reads +like a scientific report. If he had headed the section that we just +covered, "Description," we would not have been too surprised to find +the following section headed, "Action": + + +_15. Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the +earth by the living creatures, with his four faces._ + +If we read Ezekiel correctly and the creatures did have helicopter +attachments on their backs, we can assume that one of them now +started his helicopter, which would appear as a "wheel" to Ezekiel, +and probably surprised him greatly. + + +_16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the +colour of Beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance +and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel._ + +Here we must digress in order to put ourselves into the life and time +of this man because he has mentioned the wheel. A wheel did not have +quite the same meaning for him as it does for you and I, living in a +mechanical age. The wheel in 600 B.C. in the area around the eastern +end of the Mediterranean, the most civilized part of the world at that +time, had only a few very limited uses. + +One use, old even in Ezekiel's time was the potter's wheel; a simple +platform mounted on crude vertical bearings so that it could be turned +with one hand while the clay was worked with the other. From this the +grindstone and the lapidary wheel developed for working metal and +stone. These early machines probably employed some form of foot +treadle but even these could not turn the wheel very fast. If the +stone had a large enough diameter, it was possible to get the speed at +the outer edge high enough to produce sparks when grinding hard +material. The "work" took place at some distance from the axis, +usually at the edge of the stone. + +The wheel we usually associate with ancient times is the cart wheel. +In its earliest form it was a solid wheel, like those still in use in +primitive sections of Mexico. Even with the cart wheel, ancient man +would associate the edge of the wheel with the "work" of the wheel. +This was the part that left a track in the mud and dust, crushed an +occasional rock and fractured an occasional toe. + +In order to increase the efficiency of military chariots it was +necessary to build a wheel that was lighter, yet just as strong as the +solid model. This was first done by cutting out "lightening holes" +between the hub and rim. Pressing this invention to the ultimate +produced a spoked wheel. The Egyptians used a six-spoked chariot wheel +thousands of years before Ezekiel's time, and the Greeks and others +had four-spoke models. This was quite an invention and in addition to +its useful aspects, it produced some rather unusual, even magical +side-effects. As every child knows, if you turn your tricycle +upside-down and spin the wheel, the spokes seem to vanish. All that +can be seen is the rim and the parts of the hub near the center of +rotation. No matter what shape the hub actually is, it too looks round +like a wheel. It is very likely that such an effect was referred to as +"a wheel within a wheel." + +In verse 16 Ezekiel says that, "wheels and their work was the colour +of beryl ...", a blue-green color. This sounds like the emphasis is on +the color at the _edge_ of the wheel. This could be from a flame +coming from jets on the tips of the rotors. + +All of the creatures must have started their rotors. ("... they four +had one likeness.") They looked like "... a wheel in the middle of a +wheel." Or the spinning spokes of a wheel. Notice also that he never +mentions "wings" and "wheels" at the same time, for when one appears +the other vanishes. + + +_17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned +not when they went._ + +If four men were standing fairly close together on the ground with +running helicopters, they would tend to spread out as they left the +ground, so as to not run into each other. Moreover, with a helicopter, +it is not necessary to _face_ the direction you intend to go. This +sounds like four men lifting off the ground, spreading out slightly +and starting up and away, in formation. + + +_18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; +and their rings were full of eyes round about them four._ + +The four creatures are now high in the air above Ezekiel, a dreadful +and awe-inspiring sight for a man of Ezekiel's time. Their "rings" +obviously are the flames from their tip-jets, seen from below--the +only part of the wheel now visible from far below. And the rings +_would_ be full of eyes. When a jet or rocket motor is operating there +is a shock wave generated in the tailpipe which tends to cut the +exhaust gas into segments. Time exposures of jet aircraft at night +often show this. When a tip-jet is operating, these bright, evenly +spaced spots give it the appearance of a string of pearls, "... full +of eyes round about them...." + + +_19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went up by them: +and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the +wheels were lifted up._ + +Ezekiel makes it clear that he does not know whether the men are +lifting the wheels or the wheels lifting the men, but both went up +together. + + +_20. Withersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their +spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted over against them: for the +spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels._ + +This is a most sophisticated opinion. Although Ezekiel was describing +only what he saw, he could not help but have some opinions about the +creatures. In verse nineteen he makes it clear that he does not know +whether man is lifting the machine, or the other way around, but here +he makes it clear that whichever, there is no doubt that the creatures +are _controlling_. They are not being carried off by the will of the +wheel. + + +_21. When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood; +and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted +up over against them: for the spirit of the living creatures was in +the wheels._ + +This carries the idea of control one step farther. Not only are the +men controlling the wheels, but they are self-controlled: They are +flying in formation. + + +_22. And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living +creatures was as the colour of terrible crystal, stretched forth over +their heads above._ + +Perhaps this verse was moved out of it's original position, for it +returns to the description of the creatures. You may have noticed that +many of the verses are written so that it is in part, an enlargement +of the thought put forward in the preceding verse, and part new +thought, to be enlarged upon in the following verse. Verses twenty-two +and twenty-three _seem_ to go together. Both would fit the rest of the +chapter better if they were between verses twelve and thirteen. + +What is meant by "firmament"? These people had no term for a +hollow-sphere. Most spherical objects were not hollow. They had no +soap, so they had no soap bubbles. The most common thing to compare a +hollow sphere to was the sky, the bowl of the heavens--the firmament. +This crystal-clear bubble was over the heads of the creatures, one on +each creature. + +We will come to the word firmament again, but notice that this is, +"... the _likeness_ of the firmament ...", not the firmament itself. +Later verses speak only of the "firmament". + + +_23. And under the firmaments were their wings straight, the one +toward the other: every one had two, which covered on this side, and +every one had two which covered on that side, their bodies._ + +If you changed "... under the firmament ..." to, "... below the sky" +you would get a clearer picture. If you look at the picture of a +house, the roof is, "below the sky," if you start at the top and work +down. If you start at the ground and work up, the roof is, "at the +top" of the house. Ezekiel's description of the wings, which is +continued in this verse, concerns the wings "at the top." They are +(connected), "... one toward the other, about like in figure one." + + +_24. And when they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the +noise of great waters, like the voice of the Almighty, the voice of +speech, as the noise of the host: when they stood they let down their +wings._ + +If you have ever stood near a running tip-jet, or any jet engine, I +think you will know what Ezekiel means. The last statement is most +interesting. It seems that when the creatures landed again they +detached the helicopter mechanisms and set them down, as anyone will +with a heavy back-pack who is resting or waiting. + + +_25. And there was a voice from the firmament that was over their +heads, when they stood, and had let down their wings._ + +This voice, or sound, was not from the _likeness_ of the firmament, +but from the sky, as they stood there with their wings off. + +This is the end of Ezekiel's attention to the four creatures. + + +_26. And above the firmament that was over their heads was the +likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone; and upon +the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man +above upon it._ + +Out of the sky comes a man on a green seat. But a throne is more than +a chair. It is usually associated with a platform. This may be some +kind of flying platform similar to those being tested for the +transporting of infantry. + + +_27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round +about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and +from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the +appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about._ + +Since this thing was high over their heads, and he saw fire round +about it, the fire may have been on the under side. What he says about +the man is very like what he said about the other four, except that he +describes the man from the waist, up and down, as if he could not see +the area near the man's waist. + + +_28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of +rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was +the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I +saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one who spake._ + +What prismatic effect, brighter than the outdoor desert sunshine is +hard to imagine, but a large shining object close at hand would be +pretty terrifying. It seems strange that Ezekiel would not throw +himself upon the ground, after withstanding all he had seen up till +now, but we must remember that a man seated on a throne, a flying +throne at that might have a lot more meaning for him than it would for +you and me. If this object happened to come down closer to him than +the other creatures had, he might well have broken. + +We have now covered every verse of the first chapter quite thoroughly. +Since the Book of Ezekiel contains forty-eight chapters, we might fear +that this is just the beginning of a long and tiring study. +Fortunately or unfortunately this is not the case. The second chapter +begins: + + +_804._ + +_And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon they feet, and I will +speak to thee._ + +_2. And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me +upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me._ + +_3. And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of +Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and +their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day._ + +This typically prophetic writing goes on for many pages, telling the +woes and sins of the Israelites. Reference is made in a few places to +the material in the first chapter, but even this dies out before the +end of the book. + +No mention is made again of the living creatures till chapter three +where the following verse is found: + + +_13. I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that +touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against them, +and a noise of great rushing._ + +This combines some of the ideas of earlier verses without adding any +new information. Notice that writer has the notion that the wings of +one creature touched those of another, or that the creatures touched +one another. + +This verse is typical of several more scattered throughout the first +third of the book. All the verses mentioning the living creatures +after the first chapter are more dramatic and all fail to continue the +style of a careful reporter. No new ideas are advanced, but some +rather unusual contradictions are introduced, by using several parts +of several verses of Chapter One. Chapter Ten reads like an attempt at +rephrasing Chapter One and Chapter Eleven is the last mention of the +living creatures in the entire book. + +Although it contains no further information on the living creatures, +Chapter Three has a verse that should be mentioned. Verse fifteen +sounds like a fitting conclusion to the first chapter: + +[Illustration] + + +_15. Then I came to them of the captivity at Tel-Abib, that dwelt by +the river Chebar, and I sat where they sat, and remained there +astonished among them for seven days._ + +Just what do we have? We have a description of four spacesuited and +helicopter-equipped men, getting off of, or out of something that +landed in a cloud of dust or smoke. The four men start their +helicopters, take off and fly to some height. On returning to the +ground they remove their flying gear and wait. They are met by a fifth +man, riding on a flying platform. Such an event would cause some +interest in any community today, but in those times it could only be +interpreted as supernatural--a miracle. The miracle may well be that +the story has been preserved for us, twenty-six centuries later. + +A word for word interpretation is only part of the oddity of this +chapter. Several other aspects are worth pondering. The whole chapter +has a well-worn feeling, as though the author had told and re-told it +many times. It reads like a deposition, taken down by a police +officer, after the witness, who prides himself on truthfulness, has +told the story over and over to his incredulous friends. It has a +certain poetic beauty. It has the style of one who is telling you the +truth, no matter whether you are going to believe it or not. It is +the presentation of a tableau that makes no sense to the man who +witnessed it, or to those to whom he is describing it. + +The product of a man's imagination is tied to his own experience, his +own time. A wonderful tale of the supernatural may sound very +imaginative to the contemporary of the teller, but it will date itself +to a later generation. The lives of the Greek gods are related to the +lives of the early Greeks. An imaginative science-fiction writer such +as Jules Verne is limited in the same way. As good as he was, +experience has set an outer limit to his imagination. Ezekiel's tale +is not in this class. To his contemporaries, it was out of step with +reality. To us it is real enough, but out of step with time. The most +credible explanation is that it really happened. + + * * * * * + +Perhaps there are some points of my interpretation that you do not +agree with, but as a whole the story does hang together rather well. +If you have the feeling that it would be easy to fit the words around +an entirely different set of circumstances, I suggest that you try. + +It is interesting to know that some years ago a verbal battle raged in +theological circles as to whether Ezekiel wrote the Book of Ezekiel. +One school of thought held that he did, while the other school held +that the first chapter was a "forgery," written in the third century +before Christ, and tacked on as a sort of "leader" to Ezekiel's book. +For our purposes it cannot be a forgery. It makes little difference +how long ago it was written, so long as it was not since World War II! + +Suppose Ezekiel or some ancient man actually saw what I have proposed. +What are the possible explanations? Is it possible that some ancient +race, unknown to us, could have developed such equipment? It is not +likely. During the last one hundred years we have been prodding about +in the earth and finding so many ancient records that someone else +besides Ezekiel would certainly have left us a report on them. + +The things that were science fiction twenty years ago are solid fact +now. We know that a landing on the Moon is only a question of time, a +few years at the most. The planets of our Solar System will follow, at +least some before the turn of the century, probably. As for the +planets of neighboring stars we cannot say. We have no way of +exploring them at present, but that is not the same as saying that we +never will. If the past performance of the human race is any measure, +they will likely fall to exploration within two hundred years. + +If you concede that it is possible that we can visit other star +systems in a future not too distant, why then could we not have been +visited some time in the past? It may tend to deflate our ego to think +that there may be intelligent beings not too different from us who are +advanced beyond us. It need not. One of the most striking features of +Ezekiel's story, if it has been decoded correctly, is that these +beings are very much like we are, right at the present time. That puts +them three or four thousand years ahead of us, a very small amount +indeed when we consider the long sweep of human life and development +before the dawn of written history. + +We are so used to stories of "Bug-eyed Monsters" coming to Earth, that +the idea of beings from other worlds looking and acting human seems +fantastic. It should not. There is good sound scientific reason to +believe that there is little chance of it being any other way. Life is +a delicate and fragile thing when compared to cosmic extremes of +temperature and environment in our universe. If life formed on earth +as science now believes that it did, we must have had just the right +size planet at just the right distance from a particular type of star. +While such extremely narrow limits are going to reduce the number of +places in the universe where life can develop, it is also going to +limit the _differences_. In our creation things operate by rule. The +rule is that in similar circumstance there are similar solutions to a +problem. Man is the solution of the problem of building the highest +form of life on Earth. On a similar planet we can expect to find a +similar solution. This is simply the extension of the theory of +_parallel evolution_ to a cosmic scale. + +If then, we were visited by people from another world, what were they +doing here? Strangely enough, there is considerable evidence of what +they were up to from Ezekiel's own testimony. Let us suppose that +these creatures were very much like we expect to be in five hundred +years. They have come from some other star system in a ship whose +principle of operation is as yet unknown to us. We can assume that it +was a rather large ship, being that there were five beings on board at +once, and we can presume that enough of a crew remained aboard to +return it home in case something happened to the explorers. How would +we proceed in such a case? + +It is not likely that such a large ship would be brought down to the +surface of the earth. After arriving in the neighborhood of the earth, +it would be put into orbit, and the surface of the earth would be +studied through telescopes for days or weeks. The entire radio +spectrum would be scanned to determine if there were inhabitants +below, capable of operating electrical equipment. A small--manned or +unmanned--flyer would be sent down into the upper atmosphere to +determine the level of radioactivity, air components, spore and +bacteria count and radio signals incapable of penetrating the +atmosphere. From the ship the land areas would be mapped and studied. +Any large object on the ground that appeared to be of an artificial +nature would be given particular attention. During the night-time +hours below, these objects and areas would be very carefully observed +for signs of light. + +In the case of our visitors of twenty-six centuries ago, this is what +they would have found: Quite a few artificial works could be seen. +Cultivated fields and large buildings would be easily visible in many +places around the eastern end of the Mediterranean. The Pyramids were +old even then. (The Great Wall in China probably had not been +started.) There would be no radio sounds, except for an occasional +lightning click. We do not know how well their cities were lighted at +night, but they were probably too dim to see. Tiny orange pinpoints of +light from outdoor bonfires could probably be seen around the globe, +but there would be more of them around the Mediterranean and in the +East and Near East than anywhere else. The radioactivity level would +be low. Our visitors would conclude that the inhabitants were either +in the early stages of civilization, or were once highly civilized and +now sunk back to a primitive stage. They would know that this was due +to something other than atomic war. + +We have to conclude that these were moral beings. If the conditions +below were as they seemed to be, that of an early civilization, they +would not want to interfere. They would want to observe without being +observed, so even if it were technically possible they would not want +to bring a large ship down. They would send down as small and +inconspicuous a vehicle as possible. + +We usually picture such a craft as a small version of the larger ship, +or a large--by our standards--rocket, or an aircraft similar to our +Dyna-soar. For people this advanced technologically something a lot +simpler might be used. It might be an open vehicle, similar to our +flying platforms, but with vastly more powerful nuclear power plants. +The men going down would have to wear air-tight suits--spacesuits, and +would have to leave them on all the time they were below, for fear of +becoming infected with molds and viruses that the natives would long +since have become immune to. One man, the pilot, would stay with the +platform while the others did the observing and recording. + +The flying platform would have no need for rapid forward motion, at +least inside the atmosphere and therefore would have little need for +streamlining or protective covering for the passengers, who would +carry their equipment with them. Most of the equipment for the survey +would be built into the suits. They would each carry a set of portable +helicopter attachments so they could cover more ground in a hurry. +Like small helicopters of our time, these probably would have a rather +limited speed and range, but they would be extremely maneuverable. + +The platform on the other hand, being nuclear powered, would probably +be very powerful and have almost unlimited range, but it would be less +maneuverable. The products of its exhaust might be radioactive and +therefore its operators would be reluctant to operate it above or +near the natives of the planet, or places that they frequented. + +As they push away from the mother-ship the spacemen would be in +free-fall and would tend to "float" nearby until they turned the +bottom side of the platform toward the direction of their orbit and +applied power. They would then drop toward the surface, but with +almost unlimited power available they could keep the downward +component of their fall within limits and prevent overheating. They +could probably be on the surface in less than an hour. + +The first and most likely area of exploration would be Egypt. The +platform could be landed a few miles back from the Nile and be in +completely unoccupied desert. The four helicopter-equipped explorers +could put on their rotating-wing backpacks and by keeping low, come up +very close to some center of civilization without being seen. By going +up to a few thousand feet they could observe a fairly large area. Even +if they were spotted, they would be small and unrecognizable, and +cause a minimum amount of excitement. + +Like any tourist in any age they would probably be most interested in +the territory around the pyramids. When they had finished here they +might want to look over the country around what is now Bagdad, but +_then_ only near the capital city of Nebuchadnezzar's empire. This is +about eight hundred miles away, an impractical trip by helicopter, so +they would return to the platform, climb to a few hundred thousand +feet, and scoot over in a few minutes. Here they would land again in +some uninhabited spot and repeat the maneuver. This country was +probably sprinkled with more people than they expected. Maybe that's +why this is the legendary flying carpet country, or maybe not. At any +rate, one lonely military prisoner, working by himself near the banks +of a stream must have seen them. Even if they did notice him, what +possible harm could he do? In the present state of the civilization +who would remember what he said or even believe him? I do. + + +THE END + + * * * * * + + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by +Arthur W. Orton + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FOUR-FACED VISITORS OF EZEKIEL *** + +***** This file should be named 30252.txt or 30252.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/0/2/5/30252/ + +Produced by Sankar Viswanathan, Greg Weeks, and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/old/30252.zip b/old/30252.zip Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..a7bff8c --- /dev/null +++ b/old/30252.zip |
