summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 19:53:24 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 19:53:24 -0700
commit996a35f5e47605680f45caf5e349d96b66e55b65 (patch)
treedb32bd22c37ede3182536092caba9d6b64c3c800
initial commit of ebook 30252HEADmain
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--30252-0.txt838
-rw-r--r--30252-h/30252-h.htm905
-rw-r--r--30252-h/images/image_001.jpgbin0 -> 31547 bytes
-rw-r--r--30252-h/images/image_002.jpgbin0 -> 31464 bytes
-rw-r--r--30252-h/images/image_003.jpgbin0 -> 33216 bytes
-rw-r--r--30252-h/images/image_004.jpgbin0 -> 36783 bytes
-rw-r--r--30252-h/images/image_w.jpgbin0 -> 2588 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
-rw-r--r--old/30252-h.zipbin0 -> 153632 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/30252-h/30252-h.htm1323
-rw-r--r--old/30252-h/images/image_001.jpgbin0 -> 31547 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/30252-h/images/image_002.jpgbin0 -> 31464 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/30252-h/images/image_003.jpgbin0 -> 33216 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/30252-h/images/image_004.jpgbin0 -> 36783 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/30252-h/images/image_w.jpgbin0 -> 2588 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/30252.txt1230
-rw-r--r--old/30252.zipbin0 -> 22426 bytes
19 files changed, 4312 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/30252-0.txt b/30252-0.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1e71d75
--- /dev/null
+++ b/30252-0.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,838 @@
+*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 30252 ***
+
+ Transcriber's Note:
+
+ This etext was produced from Analog Science Fact & Fiction March 1961.
+ Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U.S. copyright
+ on this publication was renewed.
+
+
+
+ THE
+
+ FOUR-FACED
+
+ VISITORS
+
+ OF ... EZEKIEL
+
+
+
+
+ By ARTHUR W. ORTON
+
+
+
+ _Ezekiel, they say, "saw de wheel"--but he saw somewhat more
+ than that. And Orton suggests that what he saw made
+ perfectly good sense ... to the understanding!_
+
+
+
+ Illustrated by Orton
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+
+
+We are told from our Sunday School days that the Bible is a "living
+book," the oldest of man's written works that is read and used anew,
+from generation to generation. It remains "living" because we are able
+to find new meaning to fit our daily lives. Although it is not the
+usual kind of new meaning, I believe that I have found something of
+the sort in the very old prophesies of Ezekiel.
+
+Bible scholars have long recognized the first chapter of Ezekiel as a
+strange and nearly unfathomable account of a vision. I suggest that it
+is strange only because it is written by a man far removed from us in
+time and experience, about a subject totally unfamiliar to men of his
+time. I do not think that this was a vision in the usual sense, nor
+was it meant to be mystical. This particular chapter has been called
+"Science fiction in the Bible" and many attempts have been made to
+unravel the meaning of the original author, along both spiritual and
+mundane lines. I am convinced that this chapter is the account of an
+actual happening; the landing of extraterrestial beings, reported by a
+careful, truthful and self-possessed observer.
+
+I am not a student of theology and therefore you may feel that I am
+being presumptive in attempting to throw light on a mystery as old and
+well-studied as Ezekiel's first chapter. I feel that any success that
+I may have in doing so will be due to the accident of my birth at the
+very beginning of an era when the events I have to describe are fact,
+or are about to become fact.
+
+If, as I believe, this is an account of an actual encounter with men
+from space, I may be better able to interpret the meaning than a
+student of theology, who by training and interest, is looking for a
+theological meaning. I have worked with mechanical things, and as an
+instructor of aircraft mechanics for most of my adult life. During
+this time I have had to untangle a lot of mechanical misconceptions
+and misunderstandings. I think that this gives me some insight into
+this problem.
+
+If you are not too familiar with the Old Testament, I suggest that you
+read through the first chapter of Ezekiel to get the feeling of the
+flow of words, and a general idea of what sort of material we will be
+covering. If you have done a considerable amount of reading in the
+Bible, I am sure you will notice at once how different and
+"un-Bible-like" this chapter sounds. It isn't long. The first chapter
+covers little more than one page. Don't expect to get a clear picture
+the first time through. It seems to have an elusive quality. About the
+time you feel that you have hold of a fact, it seems to be
+contradicted in a later verse. I am going to try to show you that this
+is due to your own preconceived notions of what some of the words and
+phrases mean. You, not Ezekiel, are supplying the contradictions.
+
+You will see that I am not going to make excuses for the words, as
+written. It is my belief that those who had the task of translating
+the Bible from its original tongue and re-copying it through the ages
+were particularly careful of this chapter because they did not
+understand it and were afraid of damaging it.
+
+Let us begin with the first verse of chapter one:
+
+
+_The Book of The Prophet EZEKIEL_
+
+
+803. Chapter 1
+
+
+_Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in
+the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river
+of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God._
+
+
+_2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king
+Jehoiachin's captivity._
+
+
+_3. The word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the
+son of Buzi, in the Land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the
+hand of the Lord was there upon him._
+
+This fixes the location of this incident on the outskirts of Bagdad.
+The Chebar is sometimes called "The Grand Canal of Bagdad." Although
+the entire book was supposed to have been written by Ezekiel, the
+second and third verses sound like an editor's note, inserted by a
+later writer.
+
+
+_4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a
+great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about
+it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the
+midst of the fire._
+
+Here is a man who had lived most of his life in arid desert country.
+He had probably seen whirlwinds of all kinds, from dust-devils to
+full-scale tornadoes. He was an accurate and honest observer, as we
+shall see later. If he said it was a whirlwind, it must have really
+been one, or at least it looked enough like one to fool him for a
+while. Notice that he does not say that it was high in the air, or
+that it came out of the sky, but, "... out of the north," or toward
+him from the north.
+
+The first thing that he noticed was that it had fire associated with
+it, a strange companion for a whirlwind. There is something strange
+about the fire itself. He says that it "infolds itself," which
+suggests a fire of more active nature than Ezekiel would be accustomed
+to. The association of fire and whirlwind must have struck him as
+peculiar.
+
+Also something amber colored was associated with the cloud and fire.
+He said that this color came "out of the midst," which might mean that
+it was above the cloud and flame, or appeared as the fire and cloud
+subsided, or blew to one side. Considering the detail he gives in
+later verses, this is quite vague, as it might be if he saw it from a
+distance.
+
+
+_5. Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living
+creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a
+man._
+
+Why didn't he say that out came four men? Remember that he is telling
+this to very primitive, superstitious people. He was himself bred in a
+time when the supernatural was taken for granted. Under these
+conditions he has gone about as far as he could by saying that they
+certainly looked like four men. He does not say here that he took them
+for angels or any other kind of supernatural beings.
+
+
+_6. And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings._
+
+This short verse is very clear, yet you wonder how a creature with
+four faces and four wings could possibly be taken for a man, even by
+you or me.
+
+Although he does not say so, we can imply that these creatures must
+have advanced much closer to him after they got out of the fire and
+cloud, for him to be able to see so much detail.
+
+Imagine the courage it took for him to stay put in order to observe
+these creatures. Notice also how objective he is, never mentioning his
+own feelings.
+
+
+_7. And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was
+like the sole of a calf's foot; and they sparkled like the colour of
+burnished brass._
+
+Each verse of the description covers one or two parts of the
+creatures. When Ezekiel mentions more than one part it becomes
+confusing, so that one verse seems to contradict another. These can
+usually be sorted out however. Nowhere will you find a direct
+contradiction.
+
+Here he is describing the feet only. The word "straight" can be taken
+several ways. Does he mean _regular feet_, or feet that point straight
+forward, or feet that are straight up and down, like an elephant's?
+Probably he means regular, forward-pointing feet because he does not
+dwell on the point. In other places he leans heavily on simile to
+describe some unusual feature of the beings.
+
+The sole of the foot sounds as if it was heavily cleated. What then
+has he described in this verse? For a person living in a warm climate
+who had never seen any footwear more complicated than a sandal, he has
+described a highly polished leather, plastic or metal boot very well.
+
+
+_8. And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four
+sides; and they four had their faces and their wings._
+
+Notice carefully that he is _not_ saying that each creature had four
+man-like hands, one on each of four sides. He is saying that each has
+the normal number of hands and they are located _below_ their wings.
+Remember that he was a careful observer and he had probably noticed
+that birds have wings _instead_ of arms. These had both. In addition,
+he has given us another bit of information about the distribution of
+the wings. They do not appear to be arranged like a biplane, but each
+wing is at a ninety-degree angle from its neighboring wing like a
+helicopter.
+
+Ezekiel must have been something of a numerologist. He points out that
+there are four creatures, and each of the four has four faces each,
+and each has four wings each--but not four hands.
+
+
+_9. Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they
+went; they went every one straight forward._
+
+He is not saying that the wings of one creature are joined to the
+wings of another creature. He is saying that each wing is joined to
+another wing, not directly to the creature.
+
+The second and third parts of this verse present a mystery. We do not
+know what the "theys" refer to. There are three "theys" in this verse,
+one after another and we are given very few clues to which refer to
+_creatures_ and which refer to wings. The first "they" most likely is
+tied to the first part of the verse and therefore refers to the wings.
+Given this, there are still three interpretations:
+
+ 1. _The wings_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The wings_
+ went every one straight forward.
+
+ 2. _The wings_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; _The
+ wings_ went every one straight forward.
+
+ 3. _The wings_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; _The
+ creatures_ went every one straight forward.
+
+None of these three statements make much of a point, whether the
+creatures have helicopter wings, or bird-angel wings. Let us assume
+then that the first "they" refers to the creatures:
+
+ 1. _The creatures_ turned not when _the creatures_ went;
+ _The creatures_ went every one straight forward.
+
+ 2. _The creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The
+ wings_ went every one straight forward.
+
+ 3. _The creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The
+ creatures_ went every one straight forward.
+
+This last statement would pretty well describe the action of the
+blades of an inoperative helicopter being carried forward in a
+straight line. It would strike Ezekiel as odd that the wings might
+move and turn without turning the men under them. You might wonder why
+he would say "... wings went ..." instead of "... wings turned...."
+When a light breeze moves the blades of an inoperative helicopter the
+blades not only turn, but they change their pitch and plane in a most
+random manner.
+
+Although Ezekiel has not completed his description of the creatures,
+we can try now to form a picture of what he saw. No matter how we bend
+and squeeze, we are not going to get a Michelangelo-type angel. Look
+at figure one. Go back over the points that Ezekiel has described. You
+will see that it fits quite well.
+
+
+_10. As for the likeness of the faces, they four had the face of a
+man, and the face of a lion, on the right side; and they four had the
+face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an
+eagle._
+
+[Illustration]
+
+This again does not sound very man-like. You wonder what could have
+kept him from pronouncing them demons. If you will study figure two,
+you will see what Ezekiel described. Now look at figure three. How
+much better could a man living six centuries before Christ describe
+figure three?
+
+
+_11. Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; Two
+wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their
+bodies._
+
+See figure one again. The arrangement is like he describes. Notice
+that when he talks about "... the wings ..." of one creature, he
+apparently means the whole system of wings and attachments.
+
+
+_12. And they went every one straight forward: wither the spirit was
+to go, they went; and they turned not as they went._
+
+Again we have trouble with the "theys." Notice however, that the first part
+of this verse repeats the last part of verse nine. If we were right in that
+verse, the first "they" in this refers to the creatures again. The second
+part of this verse contains a new idea, "whither the spirit was to go ...",
+has an opposite meaning from "... they went ... straight forward ..."
+and, "... they turned not when they went." The first and last part sounds
+like the four creatures were marching purposefully in one direction. If
+then the second or middle part refers to the wings, we could read it:
+
+ "And _the creatures_ went every one straight forward:
+ whither the spirit was to go, _the wings_ went; and _the
+ creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went."
+
+Again we have a picture of four men walking with their inoperative
+helicopters moving in several different ways as the breeze and the
+men's motions cause them to move slightly.
+
+Notice that Ezekiel seems to be more impressed with the wings and
+their motion than with any other feature of what he witnessed.
+
+
+_13. As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was
+like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went
+up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and
+out of the fire went forth lightning._
+
+[Illustration]
+
+Here he is describing their over-all appearance. We can assume that
+creatures that look like men but has a surface that resembles lights,
+coals and fire must be wearing suits with a brightly colored metallic
+surface. The modern anodized aluminium coatings glisten and sparkle
+with an effect like he describes. If these are space-suits, there is a
+good reason for making them gaudy. If they were worn in space while
+working on and around a ship, they should be as bright and
+eye-catching as possible, in the case the man became detached and
+floated away. He would be quite visible against the blackness of
+space.
+
+
+_14. And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a
+flash of lightning._
+
+This might mean that they moved swiftly, but more than likely it means
+that they sparkled and shined on all sides, and this was visible as
+they moved about.
+
+This ends the description for a while. There are two later verses of
+description, but we will take this when we come to it. It is
+surprising that Ezekiel has organized his material so well. It reads
+like a scientific report. If he had headed the section that we just
+covered, "Description," we would not have been too surprised to find
+the following section headed, "Action":
+
+
+_15. Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the
+earth by the living creatures, with his four faces._
+
+If we read Ezekiel correctly and the creatures did have helicopter
+attachments on their backs, we can assume that one of them now
+started his helicopter, which would appear as a "wheel" to Ezekiel,
+and probably surprised him greatly.
+
+
+_16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the
+colour of Beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance
+and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel._
+
+Here we must digress in order to put ourselves into the life and time
+of this man because he has mentioned the wheel. A wheel did not have
+quite the same meaning for him as it does for you and I, living in a
+mechanical age. The wheel in 600 B.C. in the area around the eastern
+end of the Mediterranean, the most civilized part of the world at that
+time, had only a few very limited uses.
+
+One use, old even in Ezekiel's time was the potter's wheel; a simple
+platform mounted on crude vertical bearings so that it could be turned
+with one hand while the clay was worked with the other. From this the
+grindstone and the lapidary wheel developed for working metal and
+stone. These early machines probably employed some form of foot
+treadle but even these could not turn the wheel very fast. If the
+stone had a large enough diameter, it was possible to get the speed at
+the outer edge high enough to produce sparks when grinding hard
+material. The "work" took place at some distance from the axis,
+usually at the edge of the stone.
+
+The wheel we usually associate with ancient times is the cart wheel.
+In its earliest form it was a solid wheel, like those still in use in
+primitive sections of Mexico. Even with the cart wheel, ancient man
+would associate the edge of the wheel with the "work" of the wheel.
+This was the part that left a track in the mud and dust, crushed an
+occasional rock and fractured an occasional toe.
+
+In order to increase the efficiency of military chariots it was
+necessary to build a wheel that was lighter, yet just as strong as the
+solid model. This was first done by cutting out "lightening holes"
+between the hub and rim. Pressing this invention to the ultimate
+produced a spoked wheel. The Egyptians used a six-spoked chariot wheel
+thousands of years before Ezekiel's time, and the Greeks and others
+had four-spoke models. This was quite an invention and in addition to
+its useful aspects, it produced some rather unusual, even magical
+side-effects. As every child knows, if you turn your tricycle
+upside-down and spin the wheel, the spokes seem to vanish. All that
+can be seen is the rim and the parts of the hub near the center of
+rotation. No matter what shape the hub actually is, it too looks round
+like a wheel. It is very likely that such an effect was referred to as
+"a wheel within a wheel."
+
+In verse 16 Ezekiel says that, "wheels and their work was the colour
+of beryl ...", a blue-green color. This sounds like the emphasis is on
+the color at the _edge_ of the wheel. This could be from a flame
+coming from jets on the tips of the rotors.
+
+All of the creatures must have started their rotors. ("... they four
+had one likeness.") They looked like "... a wheel in the middle of a
+wheel." Or the spinning spokes of a wheel. Notice also that he never
+mentions "wings" and "wheels" at the same time, for when one appears
+the other vanishes.
+
+
+_17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned
+not when they went._
+
+If four men were standing fairly close together on the ground with
+running helicopters, they would tend to spread out as they left the
+ground, so as to not run into each other. Moreover, with a helicopter,
+it is not necessary to _face_ the direction you intend to go. This
+sounds like four men lifting off the ground, spreading out slightly
+and starting up and away, in formation.
+
+
+_18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful;
+and their rings were full of eyes round about them four._
+
+The four creatures are now high in the air above Ezekiel, a dreadful
+and awe-inspiring sight for a man of Ezekiel's time. Their "rings"
+obviously are the flames from their tip-jets, seen from below--the
+only part of the wheel now visible from far below. And the rings
+_would_ be full of eyes. When a jet or rocket motor is operating there
+is a shock wave generated in the tailpipe which tends to cut the
+exhaust gas into segments. Time exposures of jet aircraft at night
+often show this. When a tip-jet is operating, these bright, evenly
+spaced spots give it the appearance of a string of pearls, "... full
+of eyes round about them...."
+
+
+_19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went up by them:
+and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the
+wheels were lifted up._
+
+Ezekiel makes it clear that he does not know whether the men are
+lifting the wheels or the wheels lifting the men, but both went up
+together.
+
+
+_20. Withersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their
+spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted over against them: for the
+spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels._
+
+This is a most sophisticated opinion. Although Ezekiel was describing
+only what he saw, he could not help but have some opinions about the
+creatures. In verse nineteen he makes it clear that he does not know
+whether man is lifting the machine, or the other way around, but here
+he makes it clear that whichever, there is no doubt that the creatures
+are _controlling_. They are not being carried off by the will of the
+wheel.
+
+
+_21. When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood;
+and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted
+up over against them: for the spirit of the living creatures was in
+the wheels._
+
+This carries the idea of control one step farther. Not only are the
+men controlling the wheels, but they are self-controlled: They are
+flying in formation.
+
+
+_22. And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living
+creatures was as the colour of terrible crystal, stretched forth over
+their heads above._
+
+Perhaps this verse was moved out of it's original position, for it
+returns to the description of the creatures. You may have noticed that
+many of the verses are written so that it is in part, an enlargement
+of the thought put forward in the preceding verse, and part new
+thought, to be enlarged upon in the following verse. Verses twenty-two
+and twenty-three _seem_ to go together. Both would fit the rest of the
+chapter better if they were between verses twelve and thirteen.
+
+What is meant by "firmament"? These people had no term for a
+hollow-sphere. Most spherical objects were not hollow. They had no
+soap, so they had no soap bubbles. The most common thing to compare a
+hollow sphere to was the sky, the bowl of the heavens--the firmament.
+This crystal-clear bubble was over the heads of the creatures, one on
+each creature.
+
+We will come to the word firmament again, but notice that this is,
+"... the _likeness_ of the firmament ...", not the firmament itself.
+Later verses speak only of the "firmament".
+
+
+_23. And under the firmaments were their wings straight, the one
+toward the other: every one had two, which covered on this side, and
+every one had two which covered on that side, their bodies._
+
+If you changed "... under the firmament ..." to, "... below the sky"
+you would get a clearer picture. If you look at the picture of a
+house, the roof is, "below the sky," if you start at the top and work
+down. If you start at the ground and work up, the roof is, "at the
+top" of the house. Ezekiel's description of the wings, which is
+continued in this verse, concerns the wings "at the top." They are
+(connected), "... one toward the other, about like in figure one."
+
+
+_24. And when they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the
+noise of great waters, like the voice of the Almighty, the voice of
+speech, as the noise of the host: when they stood they let down their
+wings._
+
+If you have ever stood near a running tip-jet, or any jet engine, I
+think you will know what Ezekiel means. The last statement is most
+interesting. It seems that when the creatures landed again they
+detached the helicopter mechanisms and set them down, as anyone will
+with a heavy back-pack who is resting or waiting.
+
+
+_25. And there was a voice from the firmament that was over their
+heads, when they stood, and had let down their wings._
+
+This voice, or sound, was not from the _likeness_ of the firmament,
+but from the sky, as they stood there with their wings off.
+
+This is the end of Ezekiel's attention to the four creatures.
+
+
+_26. And above the firmament that was over their heads was the
+likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone; and upon
+the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man
+above upon it._
+
+Out of the sky comes a man on a green seat. But a throne is more than
+a chair. It is usually associated with a platform. This may be some
+kind of flying platform similar to those being tested for the
+transporting of infantry.
+
+
+_27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round
+about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and
+from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the
+appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about._
+
+Since this thing was high over their heads, and he saw fire round
+about it, the fire may have been on the under side. What he says about
+the man is very like what he said about the other four, except that he
+describes the man from the waist, up and down, as if he could not see
+the area near the man's waist.
+
+
+_28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of
+rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was
+the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I
+saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one who spake._
+
+What prismatic effect, brighter than the outdoor desert sunshine is
+hard to imagine, but a large shining object close at hand would be
+pretty terrifying. It seems strange that Ezekiel would not throw
+himself upon the ground, after withstanding all he had seen up till
+now, but we must remember that a man seated on a throne, a flying
+throne at that might have a lot more meaning for him than it would for
+you and me. If this object happened to come down closer to him than
+the other creatures had, he might well have broken.
+
+We have now covered every verse of the first chapter quite thoroughly.
+Since the Book of Ezekiel contains forty-eight chapters, we might fear
+that this is just the beginning of a long and tiring study.
+Fortunately or unfortunately this is not the case. The second chapter
+begins:
+
+
+_804._
+
+_And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon they feet, and I will
+speak to thee._
+
+_2. And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me
+upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me._
+
+_3. And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of
+Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and
+their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day._
+
+This typically prophetic writing goes on for many pages, telling the
+woes and sins of the Israelites. Reference is made in a few places to
+the material in the first chapter, but even this dies out before the
+end of the book.
+
+No mention is made again of the living creatures till chapter three
+where the following verse is found:
+
+
+_13. I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that
+touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against them,
+and a noise of great rushing._
+
+This combines some of the ideas of earlier verses without adding any
+new information. Notice that writer has the notion that the wings of
+one creature touched those of another, or that the creatures touched
+one another.
+
+This verse is typical of several more scattered throughout the first
+third of the book. All the verses mentioning the living creatures
+after the first chapter are more dramatic and all fail to continue the
+style of a careful reporter. No new ideas are advanced, but some
+rather unusual contradictions are introduced, by using several parts
+of several verses of Chapter One. Chapter Ten reads like an attempt at
+rephrasing Chapter One and Chapter Eleven is the last mention of the
+living creatures in the entire book.
+
+Although it contains no further information on the living creatures,
+Chapter Three has a verse that should be mentioned. Verse fifteen
+sounds like a fitting conclusion to the first chapter:
+
+[Illustration]
+
+
+_15. Then I came to them of the captivity at Tel-Abib, that dwelt by
+the river Chebar, and I sat where they sat, and remained there
+astonished among them for seven days._
+
+Just what do we have? We have a description of four spacesuited and
+helicopter-equipped men, getting off of, or out of something that
+landed in a cloud of dust or smoke. The four men start their
+helicopters, take off and fly to some height. On returning to the
+ground they remove their flying gear and wait. They are met by a fifth
+man, riding on a flying platform. Such an event would cause some
+interest in any community today, but in those times it could only be
+interpreted as supernatural--a miracle. The miracle may well be that
+the story has been preserved for us, twenty-six centuries later.
+
+A word for word interpretation is only part of the oddity of this
+chapter. Several other aspects are worth pondering. The whole chapter
+has a well-worn feeling, as though the author had told and re-told it
+many times. It reads like a deposition, taken down by a police
+officer, after the witness, who prides himself on truthfulness, has
+told the story over and over to his incredulous friends. It has a
+certain poetic beauty. It has the style of one who is telling you the
+truth, no matter whether you are going to believe it or not. It is
+the presentation of a tableau that makes no sense to the man who
+witnessed it, or to those to whom he is describing it.
+
+The product of a man's imagination is tied to his own experience, his
+own time. A wonderful tale of the supernatural may sound very
+imaginative to the contemporary of the teller, but it will date itself
+to a later generation. The lives of the Greek gods are related to the
+lives of the early Greeks. An imaginative science-fiction writer such
+as Jules Verne is limited in the same way. As good as he was,
+experience has set an outer limit to his imagination. Ezekiel's tale
+is not in this class. To his contemporaries, it was out of step with
+reality. To us it is real enough, but out of step with time. The most
+credible explanation is that it really happened.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Perhaps there are some points of my interpretation that you do not
+agree with, but as a whole the story does hang together rather well.
+If you have the feeling that it would be easy to fit the words around
+an entirely different set of circumstances, I suggest that you try.
+
+It is interesting to know that some years ago a verbal battle raged in
+theological circles as to whether Ezekiel wrote the Book of Ezekiel.
+One school of thought held that he did, while the other school held
+that the first chapter was a "forgery," written in the third century
+before Christ, and tacked on as a sort of "leader" to Ezekiel's book.
+For our purposes it cannot be a forgery. It makes little difference
+how long ago it was written, so long as it was not since World War II!
+
+Suppose Ezekiel or some ancient man actually saw what I have proposed.
+What are the possible explanations? Is it possible that some ancient
+race, unknown to us, could have developed such equipment? It is not
+likely. During the last one hundred years we have been prodding about
+in the earth and finding so many ancient records that someone else
+besides Ezekiel would certainly have left us a report on them.
+
+The things that were science fiction twenty years ago are solid fact
+now. We know that a landing on the Moon is only a question of time, a
+few years at the most. The planets of our Solar System will follow, at
+least some before the turn of the century, probably. As for the
+planets of neighboring stars we cannot say. We have no way of
+exploring them at present, but that is not the same as saying that we
+never will. If the past performance of the human race is any measure,
+they will likely fall to exploration within two hundred years.
+
+If you concede that it is possible that we can visit other star
+systems in a future not too distant, why then could we not have been
+visited some time in the past? It may tend to deflate our ego to think
+that there may be intelligent beings not too different from us who are
+advanced beyond us. It need not. One of the most striking features of
+Ezekiel's story, if it has been decoded correctly, is that these
+beings are very much like we are, right at the present time. That puts
+them three or four thousand years ahead of us, a very small amount
+indeed when we consider the long sweep of human life and development
+before the dawn of written history.
+
+We are so used to stories of "Bug-eyed Monsters" coming to Earth, that
+the idea of beings from other worlds looking and acting human seems
+fantastic. It should not. There is good sound scientific reason to
+believe that there is little chance of it being any other way. Life is
+a delicate and fragile thing when compared to cosmic extremes of
+temperature and environment in our universe. If life formed on earth
+as science now believes that it did, we must have had just the right
+size planet at just the right distance from a particular type of star.
+While such extremely narrow limits are going to reduce the number of
+places in the universe where life can develop, it is also going to
+limit the _differences_. In our creation things operate by rule. The
+rule is that in similar circumstance there are similar solutions to a
+problem. Man is the solution of the problem of building the highest
+form of life on Earth. On a similar planet we can expect to find a
+similar solution. This is simply the extension of the theory of
+_parallel evolution_ to a cosmic scale.
+
+If then, we were visited by people from another world, what were they
+doing here? Strangely enough, there is considerable evidence of what
+they were up to from Ezekiel's own testimony. Let us suppose that
+these creatures were very much like we expect to be in five hundred
+years. They have come from some other star system in a ship whose
+principle of operation is as yet unknown to us. We can assume that it
+was a rather large ship, being that there were five beings on board at
+once, and we can presume that enough of a crew remained aboard to
+return it home in case something happened to the explorers. How would
+we proceed in such a case?
+
+It is not likely that such a large ship would be brought down to the
+surface of the earth. After arriving in the neighborhood of the earth,
+it would be put into orbit, and the surface of the earth would be
+studied through telescopes for days or weeks. The entire radio
+spectrum would be scanned to determine if there were inhabitants
+below, capable of operating electrical equipment. A small--manned or
+unmanned--flyer would be sent down into the upper atmosphere to
+determine the level of radioactivity, air components, spore and
+bacteria count and radio signals incapable of penetrating the
+atmosphere. From the ship the land areas would be mapped and studied.
+Any large object on the ground that appeared to be of an artificial
+nature would be given particular attention. During the night-time
+hours below, these objects and areas would be very carefully observed
+for signs of light.
+
+In the case of our visitors of twenty-six centuries ago, this is what
+they would have found: Quite a few artificial works could be seen.
+Cultivated fields and large buildings would be easily visible in many
+places around the eastern end of the Mediterranean. The Pyramids were
+old even then. (The Great Wall in China probably had not been
+started.) There would be no radio sounds, except for an occasional
+lightning click. We do not know how well their cities were lighted at
+night, but they were probably too dim to see. Tiny orange pinpoints of
+light from outdoor bonfires could probably be seen around the globe,
+but there would be more of them around the Mediterranean and in the
+East and Near East than anywhere else. The radioactivity level would
+be low. Our visitors would conclude that the inhabitants were either
+in the early stages of civilization, or were once highly civilized and
+now sunk back to a primitive stage. They would know that this was due
+to something other than atomic war.
+
+We have to conclude that these were moral beings. If the conditions
+below were as they seemed to be, that of an early civilization, they
+would not want to interfere. They would want to observe without being
+observed, so even if it were technically possible they would not want
+to bring a large ship down. They would send down as small and
+inconspicuous a vehicle as possible.
+
+We usually picture such a craft as a small version of the larger ship,
+or a large--by our standards--rocket, or an aircraft similar to our
+Dyna-soar. For people this advanced technologically something a lot
+simpler might be used. It might be an open vehicle, similar to our
+flying platforms, but with vastly more powerful nuclear power plants.
+The men going down would have to wear air-tight suits--spacesuits, and
+would have to leave them on all the time they were below, for fear of
+becoming infected with molds and viruses that the natives would long
+since have become immune to. One man, the pilot, would stay with the
+platform while the others did the observing and recording.
+
+The flying platform would have no need for rapid forward motion, at
+least inside the atmosphere and therefore would have little need for
+streamlining or protective covering for the passengers, who would
+carry their equipment with them. Most of the equipment for the survey
+would be built into the suits. They would each carry a set of portable
+helicopter attachments so they could cover more ground in a hurry.
+Like small helicopters of our time, these probably would have a rather
+limited speed and range, but they would be extremely maneuverable.
+
+The platform on the other hand, being nuclear powered, would probably
+be very powerful and have almost unlimited range, but it would be less
+maneuverable. The products of its exhaust might be radioactive and
+therefore its operators would be reluctant to operate it above or
+near the natives of the planet, or places that they frequented.
+
+As they push away from the mother-ship the spacemen would be in
+free-fall and would tend to "float" nearby until they turned the
+bottom side of the platform toward the direction of their orbit and
+applied power. They would then drop toward the surface, but with
+almost unlimited power available they could keep the downward
+component of their fall within limits and prevent overheating. They
+could probably be on the surface in less than an hour.
+
+The first and most likely area of exploration would be Egypt. The
+platform could be landed a few miles back from the Nile and be in
+completely unoccupied desert. The four helicopter-equipped explorers
+could put on their rotating-wing backpacks and by keeping low, come up
+very close to some center of civilization without being seen. By going
+up to a few thousand feet they could observe a fairly large area. Even
+if they were spotted, they would be small and unrecognizable, and
+cause a minimum amount of excitement.
+
+Like any tourist in any age they would probably be most interested in
+the territory around the pyramids. When they had finished here they
+might want to look over the country around what is now Bagdad, but
+_then_ only near the capital city of Nebuchadnezzar's empire. This is
+about eight hundred miles away, an impractical trip by helicopter, so
+they would return to the platform, climb to a few hundred thousand
+feet, and scoot over in a few minutes. Here they would land again in
+some uninhabited spot and repeat the maneuver. This country was
+probably sprinkled with more people than they expected. Maybe that's
+why this is the legendary flying carpet country, or maybe not. At any
+rate, one lonely military prisoner, working by himself near the banks
+of a stream must have seen them. Even if they did notice him, what
+possible harm could he do? In the present state of the civilization
+who would remember what he said or even believe him? I do.
+
+
+THE END
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by
+Arthur W. Orton
+
+*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 30252 ***
diff --git a/30252-h/30252-h.htm b/30252-h/30252-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1b94229
--- /dev/null
+++ b/30252-h/30252-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,905 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" />
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of ... Ezekiel, by Arthur W. Orton
+ </title>
+ <style type="text/css">
+/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */
+<!--
+body {
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%; background-color: #FFFFFF;
+}
+
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+p {
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+}
+
+hr {
+ width: 33%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+
+.tr {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; margin-top: 5%; margin-bottom: 5%; padding: 2em; background-color: #f6f2f2; color: black; border: dotted black 1px;}
+
+.blockquot {
+ margin-left: 5%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+.f1 { margin-left:40%; font-size:larger; font-weight:bold; }
+.center {text-align: center;}
+
+/* Images */
+.figcenter {
+ margin: auto;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+.figleft {
+ float: left;
+ clear: left;
+ margin-left: 0;
+ margin-bottom: 0em;
+ margin-top: 0.25em;
+ margin-right: 0.25em;
+ padding: 0;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+
+/* XML end ]]>*/
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 30252 ***</div>
+
+<div class="tr"><p class="center">Transcriber's Note:</p>
+<p class="center">This etext was produced from Analog Science Fact &amp; Fiction March 1961. Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U.S. copyright on this publication was renewed.</p></div>
+<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;">
+<img src="images/image_001.jpg" width="400" height="545" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<h1>THE<br />
+
+FOUR-FACED<br />
+
+VISITORS<br />
+
+OF ... EZEKIEL</h1>
+
+<p>&nbsp;</p>
+<h2>By ARTHUR W. ORTON</h2>
+<p>&nbsp;</p>
+<div class="blockquot"><p><i>Ezekiel, they say, "saw de wheel"&mdash;but he saw somewhat more
+than that. And Orton suggests that what he saw made
+perfectly good sense ... to the understanding!</i></p></div>
+<p>&nbsp;</p>
+<h3>Illustrated by Orton</h3>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+<div class="figleft" style="width: 50px;">
+<img src="images/image_w.jpg" width="50" height="50" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+<p>e are told from our Sunday School days that the Bible is a "living
+book," the oldest of man's written works that is read and used anew,
+from generation to generation. It remains "living" because we are able
+to find new meaning to fit our daily lives. Although it is not the
+usual kind of new meaning, I believe that I have found something of
+the sort in the very old prophesies of Ezekiel.</p>
+
+<p>Bible scholars have long recognized the first chapter of Ezekiel as a
+strange and nearly unfathomable account of a vision. I suggest that it
+is strange only because it is written by a man far removed from us in
+time and experience, about a subject totally unfamiliar to men of his
+time. I do not think that this was a vision in the usual sense, nor
+was it meant to be mystical. This particular chapter has been called
+"Science fiction in the Bible" and many attempts have been made to
+unravel the meaning of the original author, along both spiritual and
+mundane lines. I am convinced that this chapter is the account of an
+actual happening; the landing of extraterrestial beings, reported by a
+careful, truthful and self-possessed observer.</p>
+
+<p>I am not a student of theology and therefore you may feel that I am
+being presumptive in attempting to throw light on a mystery as old and
+well-studied as Ezekiel's first chapter. I feel that any success that
+I may have in doing so will be due to the accident of my birth at the
+very beginning of an era when the events I have to describe are fact,
+or are about to become fact.</p>
+
+<p>If, as I believe, this is an account of an actual encounter with men
+from space, I may be better able to interpret the meaning than a
+student of theology, who by training and interest, is looking for a
+theological meaning. I have worked with mechanical things, and as an
+instructor of aircraft mechanics for most of my adult life. During
+this time I have had to untangle a lot of mechanical misconceptions
+and misunderstandings. I think that this gives me some insight into
+this problem.</p>
+
+<p>If you are not too familiar with the Old Testament, I suggest that you
+read through the first chapter of Ezekiel to get the feeling of the
+flow of words, and a general idea of what sort of material we will be
+covering. If you have done a considerable amount of reading in the
+Bible, I am sure you will notice at once how different and
+"un-Bible-like" this chapter sounds. It isn't long. The first chapter
+covers little more than one page. Don't expect to get a clear picture
+the first time through. It seems to have an elusive quality. About the
+time you feel that you have hold of a fact, it seems to be
+contradicted in a later verse. I am going to try to show you that this
+is due to your own preconceived notions of what some of the words and
+phrases mean. You, not Ezekiel, are supplying the contradictions.</p>
+
+<p>You will see that I am not going to make excuses for the words, as
+written. It is my belief that those who had the task of translating
+the Bible from its original tongue and re-copying it through the ages
+were particularly careful of this chapter because they did not
+understand it and were afraid of damaging it.</p>
+
+<p>Let us begin with the first verse of chapter one:</p>
+
+
+<h4><i>The Book of The Prophet</i></h4>
+<h3><i>EZEKIEL</i></h3>
+
+<p>803.<span class="f1">Chapter 1</span></p>
+
+<p><i>Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in
+the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river
+of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God.</i></p>
+
+
+<p><i>2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king
+Jehoiachin's captivity.</i></p>
+
+
+<p><i>3. The word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the
+son of Buzi, in the Land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the
+hand of the Lord was there upon him.</i></p>
+
+<p>This fixes the location of this incident on the outskirts of Bagdad.
+The Chebar is sometimes called "The Grand Canal of Bagdad." Although
+the entire book was supposed to have been written by Ezekiel, the
+second and third verses sound like an editor's note, inserted by a
+later writer.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a
+great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about
+it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the
+midst of the fire.</i></p>
+
+<p>Here is a man who had lived most of his life in arid desert country.
+He had probably seen whirlwinds of all kinds, from dust-devils to
+full-scale tornadoes. He was an accurate and honest observer, as we
+shall see later. If he said it was a whirlwind, it must have really
+been one, or at least it looked enough like one to fool him for a
+while. Notice that he does not say that it was high in the air, or
+that it came out of the sky, but, "... out of the north," or toward
+him from the north.</p>
+
+<p>The first thing that he noticed was that it had fire associated with
+it, a strange companion for a whirlwind. There is something strange
+about the fire itself. He says that it "infolds itself," which
+suggests a fire of more active nature than Ezekiel would be accustomed
+to. The association of fire and whirlwind must have struck him as
+peculiar.</p>
+
+<p>Also something amber colored was associated with the cloud and fire.
+He said that this color came "out of the midst," which might mean that
+it was above the cloud and flame, or appeared as the fire and cloud
+subsided, or blew to one side. Considering the detail he gives in
+later verses, this is quite vague, as it might be if he saw it from a
+distance.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>5. Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living
+creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a
+man.</i></p>
+
+<p>Why didn't he say that out came four men? Remember that he is telling
+this to very primitive, superstitious people. He was himself bred in a
+time when the supernatural was taken for granted. Under these
+conditions he has gone about as far as he could by saying that they
+certainly looked like four men. He does not say here that he took them
+for angels or any other kind of supernatural beings.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>6. And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings.</i></p>
+
+<p>This short verse is very clear, yet you wonder how a creature with
+four faces and four wings could possibly be taken for a man, even by
+you or me.</p>
+
+<p>Although he does not say so, we can imply that these creatures must
+have advanced much closer to him after they got out of the fire and
+cloud, for him to be able to see so much detail.</p>
+
+<p>Imagine the courage it took for him to stay put in order to observe
+these creatures. Notice also how objective he is, never mentioning his
+own feelings.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>7. And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was
+like the sole of a calf's foot; and they sparkled like the colour of
+burnished brass.</i></p>
+
+<p>Each verse of the description covers one or two parts of the
+creatures. When Ezekiel mentions more than one part it becomes
+confusing, so that one verse seems to contradict another. These can
+usually be sorted out however. Nowhere will you find a direct
+contradiction.</p>
+
+<p>Here he is describing the feet only. The word "straight" can be taken
+several ways. Does he mean <i>regular feet</i>, or feet that point straight
+forward, or feet that are straight up and down, like an elephant's?
+Probably he means regular, forward-pointing feet because he does not
+dwell on the point. In other places he leans heavily on simile to
+describe some unusual feature of the beings.</p>
+
+<p>The sole of the foot sounds as if it was heavily cleated. What then
+has he described in this verse? For a person living in a warm climate
+who had never seen any footwear more complicated than a sandal, he has
+described a highly polished leather, plastic or metal boot very well.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>8. And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four
+sides; and they four had their faces and their wings.</i></p>
+
+<p>Notice carefully that he is <i>not</i> saying that each creature had four
+man-like hands, one on each of four sides. He is saying that each has
+the normal number of hands and they are located <i>below</i> their wings.
+Remember that he was a careful observer and he had probably noticed
+that birds have wings <i>instead</i> of arms. These had both. In addition,
+he has given us another bit of information about the distribution of
+the wings. They do not appear to be arranged like a biplane, but each
+wing is at a ninety-degree angle from its neighboring wing like a
+helicopter.</p>
+
+<p>Ezekiel must have been something of a numerologist. He points out that
+there are four creatures, and each of the four has four faces each,
+and each has four wings each&mdash;but not four hands.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>9. Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they
+went; they went every one straight forward.</i></p>
+
+<p>He is not saying that the wings of one creature are joined to the
+wings of another creature. He is saying that each wing is joined to
+another wing, not directly to the creature.</p>
+
+<p>The second and third parts of this verse present a mystery. We do not
+know what the "theys" refer to. There are three "theys" in this verse,
+one after another and we are given very few clues to which refer to
+<i>creatures</i> and which refer to wings. The first "they" most likely is
+tied to the first part of the verse and therefore refers to the wings.
+Given this, there are still three interpretations:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>1. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The wings</i>
+went every one straight forward.</p>
+
+<p>2. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; <i>The
+wings</i> went every one straight forward.</p>
+
+<p>3. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; <i>The
+creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p></div>
+
+<p>None of these three statements make much of a point, whether the
+creatures have helicopter wings, or bird-angel wings. Let us assume
+then that the first "they" refers to the creatures:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>1. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went;
+<i>The creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p>
+
+<p>2. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The
+wings</i> went every one straight forward.</p>
+
+<p>3. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The
+creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p></div>
+
+<p>This last statement would pretty well describe the action of the
+blades of an inoperative helicopter being carried forward in a
+straight line. It would strike Ezekiel as odd that the wings might
+move and turn without turning the men under them. You might wonder why
+he would say "... wings went ..." instead of "... wings turned...."
+When a light breeze moves the blades of an inoperative helicopter the
+blades not only turn, but they change their pitch and plane in a most
+random manner.</p>
+
+<p>Although Ezekiel has not completed his description of the creatures,
+we can try now to form a picture of what he saw. No matter how we bend
+and squeeze, we are not going to get a Michelangelo-type angel. Look
+at figure one. Go back over the points that Ezekiel has described. You
+will see that it fits quite well.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>10. As for the likeness of the faces, they four had the face of a
+man, and the face of a lion, on the right side; and they four had the
+face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an
+eagle.</i></p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;">
+<img src="images/image_002.jpg" width="400" height="337" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p>This again does not sound very man-like. You wonder what could have
+kept him from pronouncing them demons. If you will study figure two,
+you will see what Ezekiel described. Now look at figure three. How
+much better could a man living six centuries before Christ describe
+figure three?</p>
+
+
+<p><i>11. Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; Two
+wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their
+bodies.</i></p>
+
+<p>See figure one again. The arrangement is like he describes. Notice
+that when he talks about "... the wings ..." of one creature, he
+apparently means the whole system of wings and attachments.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>12. And they went every one straight forward: wither the spirit was
+to go, they went; and they turned not as they went.</i></p>
+
+<p>Again we have trouble with the "theys." Notice however, that the first
+part of this verse repeats the last part of verse nine. If we were
+right in that verse, the first "they" in this refers to the creatures
+again. The second part of this verse contains a new idea, "whither the
+spirit was to go ...", has an opposite meaning from "... they went
+... straight forward ..." and, "... they turned not when they went."
+The first and last part sounds like the four creatures were marching
+purposefully in one direction. If then the second or middle part
+refers to the wings, we could read it:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>"And <i>the creatures</i> went every one straight forward:
+whither the spirit was to go, <i>the wings</i> went; and <i>the
+creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went."</p></div>
+
+<p>Again we have a picture of four men walking with their inoperative
+helicopters moving in several different ways as the breeze and the
+men's motions cause them to move slightly.</p>
+
+<p>Notice that Ezekiel seems to be more impressed with the wings and
+their motion than with any other feature of what he witnessed.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>13. As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was
+like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went
+up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and
+out of the fire went forth lightning.</i></p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;">
+<img src="images/image_003.jpg" width="400" height="338" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p>Here he is describing their over-all appearance. We can assume that
+creatures that look like men but has a surface that resembles lights,
+coals and fire must be wearing suits with a brightly colored metallic
+surface. The modern anodized aluminium coatings glisten and sparkle
+with an effect like he describes. If these are space-suits, there is a
+good reason for making them gaudy. If they were worn in space while
+working on and around a ship, they should be as bright and
+eye-catching as possible, in the case the man became detached and
+floated away. He would be quite visible against the blackness of
+space.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>14. And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a
+flash of lightning.</i></p>
+
+<p>This might mean that they moved swiftly, but more than likely it means
+that they sparkled and shined on all sides, and this was visible as
+they moved about.</p>
+
+<p>This ends the description for a while. There are two later verses of
+description, but we will take this when we come to it. It is
+surprising that Ezekiel has organized his material so well. It reads
+like a scientific report. If he had headed the section that we just
+covered, "Description," we would not have been too surprised to find
+the following section headed, "Action":</p>
+
+
+<p><i>15. Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the
+earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.</i></p>
+
+<p>If we read Ezekiel correctly and the creatures did have helicopter
+attachments on their backs, we can assume that one of them now
+started his helicopter, which would appear as a "wheel" to Ezekiel,
+and probably surprised him greatly.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the
+colour of Beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance
+and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.</i></p>
+
+<p>Here we must digress in order to put ourselves into the life and time
+of this man because he has mentioned the wheel. A wheel did not have
+quite the same meaning for him as it does for you and I, living in a
+mechanical age. The wheel in 600 B.C. in the area around the eastern
+end of the Mediterranean, the most civilized part of the world at that
+time, had only a few very limited uses.</p>
+
+<p>One use, old even in Ezekiel's time was the potter's wheel; a simple
+platform mounted on crude vertical bearings so that it could be turned
+with one hand while the clay was worked with the other. From this the
+grindstone and the lapidary wheel developed for working metal and
+stone. These early machines probably employed some form of foot
+treadle but even these could not turn the wheel very fast. If the
+stone had a large enough diameter, it was possible to get the speed at
+the outer edge high enough to produce sparks when grinding hard
+material. The "work" took place at some distance from the axis,
+usually at the edge of the stone.</p>
+
+<p>The wheel we usually associate with ancient times is the cart wheel.
+In its earliest form it was a solid wheel, like those still in use in
+primitive sections of Mexico. Even with the cart wheel, ancient man
+would associate the edge of the wheel with the "work" of the wheel.
+This was the part that left a track in the mud and dust, crushed an
+occasional rock and fractured an occasional toe.</p>
+
+<p>In order to increase the efficiency of military chariots it was
+necessary to build a wheel that was lighter, yet just as strong as the
+solid model. This was first done by cutting out "lightening holes"
+between the hub and rim. Pressing this invention to the ultimate
+produced a spoked wheel. The Egyptians used a six-spoked chariot wheel
+thousands of years before Ezekiel's time, and the Greeks and others
+had four-spoke models. This was quite an invention and in addition to
+its useful aspects, it produced some rather unusual, even magical
+side-effects. As every child knows, if you turn your tricycle
+upside-down and spin the wheel, the spokes seem to vanish. All that
+can be seen is the rim and the parts of the hub near the center of
+rotation. No matter what shape the hub actually is, it too looks round
+like a wheel. It is very likely that such an effect was referred to as
+"a wheel within a wheel."</p>
+
+<p>In verse 16 Ezekiel says that, "wheels and their work was the colour
+of beryl ...", a blue-green color. This sounds like the emphasis is on
+the color at the <i>edge</i> of the wheel. This could be from a flame
+coming from jets on the tips of the rotors.</p>
+
+<p>All of the creatures must have started their rotors. ("... they four
+had one likeness.") They looked like "... a wheel in the middle of a
+wheel." Or the spinning spokes of a wheel. Notice also that he never
+mentions "wings" and "wheels" at the same time, for when one appears
+the other vanishes.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned
+not when they went.</i></p>
+
+<p>If four men were standing fairly close together on the ground with
+running helicopters, they would tend to spread out as they left the
+ground, so as to not run into each other. Moreover, with a helicopter,
+it is not necessary to <i>face</i> the direction you intend to go. This
+sounds like four men lifting off the ground, spreading out slightly
+and starting up and away, in formation.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful;
+and their rings were full of eyes round about them four.</i></p>
+
+<p>The four creatures are now high in the air above Ezekiel, a dreadful
+and awe-inspiring sight for a man of Ezekiel's time. Their "rings"
+obviously are the flames from their tip-jets, seen from below&mdash;the
+only part of the wheel now visible from far below. And the rings
+<i>would</i> be full of eyes. When a jet or rocket motor is operating there
+is a shock wave generated in the tailpipe which tends to cut the
+exhaust gas into segments. Time exposures of jet aircraft at night
+often show this. When a tip-jet is operating, these bright, evenly
+spaced spots give it the appearance of a string of pearls, "... full
+of eyes round about them...."</p>
+
+
+<p><i>19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went up by them:
+and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the
+wheels were lifted up.</i></p>
+
+<p>Ezekiel makes it clear that he does not know whether the men are
+lifting the wheels or the wheels lifting the men, but both went up
+together.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>20. Withersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their
+spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted over against them: for the
+spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels.</i></p>
+
+<p>This is a most sophisticated opinion. Although Ezekiel was describing
+only what he saw, he could not help but have some opinions about the
+creatures. In verse nineteen he makes it clear that he does not know
+whether man is lifting the machine, or the other way around, but here
+he makes it clear that whichever, there is no doubt that the creatures
+are <i>controlling</i>. They are not being carried off by the will of the
+wheel.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>21. When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood;
+and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted
+up over against them: for the spirit of the living creatures was in
+the wheels.</i></p>
+
+<p>This carries the idea of control one step farther. Not only are the
+men controlling the wheels, but they are self-controlled: They are
+flying in formation.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>22. And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living
+creatures was as the colour of terrible crystal, stretched forth over
+their heads above.</i></p>
+
+<p>Perhaps this verse was moved out of it's original position, for it
+returns to the description of the creatures. You may have noticed that
+many of the verses are written so that it is in part, an enlargement
+of the thought put forward in the preceding verse, and part new
+thought, to be enlarged upon in the following verse. Verses twenty-two
+and twenty-three <i>seem</i> to go together. Both would fit the rest of the
+chapter better if they were between verses twelve and thirteen.</p>
+
+<p>What is meant by "firmament"? These people had no term for a
+hollow-sphere. Most spherical objects were not hollow. They had no
+soap, so they had no soap bubbles. The most common thing to compare a
+hollow sphere to was the sky, the bowl of the heavens&mdash;the firmament.
+This crystal-clear bubble was over the heads of the creatures, one on
+each creature.</p>
+
+<p>We will come to the word firmament again, but notice that this is,
+"... the <i>likeness</i> of the firmament ...", not the firmament itself.
+Later verses speak only of the "firmament".</p>
+
+
+<p><i>23. And under the firmaments were their wings straight, the one
+toward the other: every one had two, which covered on this side, and
+every one had two which covered on that side, their bodies.</i></p>
+
+<p>If you changed "... under the firmament ..." to, "... below the sky"
+you would get a clearer picture. If you look at the picture of a
+house, the roof is, "below the sky," if you start at the top and work
+down. If you start at the ground and work up, the roof is, "at the
+top" of the house. Ezekiel's description of the wings, which is
+continued in this verse, concerns the wings "at the top." They are
+(connected), "... one toward the other, about like in figure one."</p>
+
+
+<p><i>24. And when they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the
+noise of great waters, like the voice of the Almighty, the voice of
+speech, as the noise of the host: when they stood they let down their
+wings.</i></p>
+
+<p>If you have ever stood near a running tip-jet, or any jet engine, I
+think you will know what Ezekiel means. The last statement is most
+interesting. It seems that when the creatures landed again they
+detached the helicopter mechanisms and set them down, as anyone will
+with a heavy back-pack who is resting or waiting.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>25. And there was a voice from the firmament that was over their
+heads, when they stood, and had let down their wings.</i></p>
+
+<p>This voice, or sound, was not from the <i>likeness</i> of the firmament,
+but from the sky, as they stood there with their wings off.</p>
+
+<p>This is the end of Ezekiel's attention to the four creatures.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>26. And above the firmament that was over their heads was the
+likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone; and upon
+the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man
+above upon it.</i></p>
+
+<p>Out of the sky comes a man on a green seat. But a throne is more than
+a chair. It is usually associated with a platform. This may be some
+kind of flying platform similar to those being tested for the
+transporting of infantry.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round
+about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and
+from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the
+appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.</i></p>
+
+<p>Since this thing was high over their heads, and he saw fire round
+about it, the fire may have been on the under side. What he says about
+the man is very like what he said about the other four, except that he
+describes the man from the waist, up and down, as if he could not see
+the area near the man's waist.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of
+rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was
+the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I
+saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one who spake.</i></p>
+
+<p>What prismatic effect, brighter than the outdoor desert sunshine is
+hard to imagine, but a large shining object close at hand would be
+pretty terrifying. It seems strange that Ezekiel would not throw
+himself upon the ground, after withstanding all he had seen up till
+now, but we must remember that a man seated on a throne, a flying
+throne at that might have a lot more meaning for him than it would for
+you and me. If this object happened to come down closer to him than
+the other creatures had, he might well have broken.</p>
+
+<p>We have now covered every verse of the first chapter quite thoroughly.
+Since the Book of Ezekiel contains forty-eight chapters, we might fear
+that this is just the beginning of a long and tiring study.
+Fortunately or unfortunately this is not the case. The second chapter
+begins:</p>
+
+
+<p><i>804.</i></p>
+
+<p><i>And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon they feet, and I will
+speak to thee.</i></p>
+
+<p><i>2. And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me
+upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me.</i></p>
+
+<p><i>3. And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of
+Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and
+their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day.</i></p>
+
+<p>This typically prophetic writing goes on for many pages, telling the
+woes and sins of the Israelites. Reference is made in a few places to
+the material in the first chapter, but even this dies out before the
+end of the book.</p>
+
+<p>No mention is made again of the living creatures till chapter three
+where the following verse is found:</p>
+
+
+<p><i>13. I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that
+touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against them,
+and a noise of great rushing.</i></p>
+
+<p>This combines some of the ideas of earlier verses without adding any
+new information. Notice that writer has the notion that the wings of
+one creature touched those of another, or that the creatures touched
+one another.</p>
+
+<p>This verse is typical of several more scattered throughout the first
+third of the book. All the verses mentioning the living creatures
+after the first chapter are more dramatic and all fail to continue the
+style of a careful reporter. No new ideas are advanced, but some
+rather unusual contradictions are introduced, by using several parts
+of several verses of Chapter One. Chapter Ten reads like an attempt at
+rephrasing Chapter One and Chapter Eleven is the last mention of the
+living creatures in the entire book.</p>
+
+<p>Although it contains no further information on the living creatures,
+Chapter Three has a verse that should be mentioned. Verse fifteen
+sounds like a fitting conclusion to the first chapter:</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;">
+<img src="images/image_004.jpg" width="500" height="370" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+
+<p><i>15. Then I came to them of the captivity at Tel-Abib, that dwelt by
+the river Chebar, and I sat where they sat, and remained there
+astonished among them for seven days.</i></p>
+
+<p>Just what do we have? We have a description of four spacesuited and
+helicopter-equipped men, getting off of, or out of something that
+landed in a cloud of dust or smoke. The four men start their
+helicopters, take off and fly to some height. On returning to the
+ground they remove their flying gear and wait. They are met by a fifth
+man, riding on a flying platform. Such an event would cause some
+interest in any community today, but in those times it could only be
+interpreted as supernatural&mdash;a miracle. The miracle may well be that
+the story has been preserved for us, twenty-six centuries later.</p>
+
+<p>A word for word interpretation is only part of the oddity of this
+chapter. Several other aspects are worth pondering. The whole chapter
+has a well-worn feeling, as though the author had told and re-told it
+many times. It reads like a deposition, taken down by a police
+officer, after the witness, who prides himself on truthfulness, has
+told the story over and over to his incredulous friends. It has a
+certain poetic beauty. It has the style of one who is telling you the
+truth, no matter whether you are going to believe it or not. It is
+the presentation of a tableau that makes no sense to the man who
+witnessed it, or to those to whom he is describing it.</p>
+
+<p>The product of a man's imagination is tied to his own experience, his
+own time. A wonderful tale of the supernatural may sound very
+imaginative to the contemporary of the teller, but it will date itself
+to a later generation. The lives of the Greek gods are related to the
+lives of the early Greeks. An imaginative science-fiction writer such
+as Jules Verne is limited in the same way. As good as he was,
+experience has set an outer limit to his imagination. Ezekiel's tale
+is not in this class. To his contemporaries, it was out of step with
+reality. To us it is real enough, but out of step with time. The most
+credible explanation is that it really happened.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<p>Perhaps there are some points of my interpretation that you do not
+agree with, but as a whole the story does hang together rather well.
+If you have the feeling that it would be easy to fit the words around
+an entirely different set of circumstances, I suggest that you try.</p>
+
+<p>It is interesting to know that some years ago a verbal battle raged in
+theological circles as to whether Ezekiel wrote the Book of Ezekiel.
+One school of thought held that he did, while the other school held
+that the first chapter was a "forgery," written in the third century
+before Christ, and tacked on as a sort of "leader" to Ezekiel's book.
+For our purposes it cannot be a forgery. It makes little difference
+how long ago it was written, so long as it was not since World War II!</p>
+
+<p>Suppose Ezekiel or some ancient man actually saw what I have proposed.
+What are the possible explanations? Is it possible that some ancient
+race, unknown to us, could have developed such equipment? It is not
+likely. During the last one hundred years we have been prodding about
+in the earth and finding so many ancient records that someone else
+besides Ezekiel would certainly have left us a report on them.</p>
+
+<p>The things that were science fiction twenty years ago are solid fact
+now. We know that a landing on the Moon is only a question of time, a
+few years at the most. The planets of our Solar System will follow, at
+least some before the turn of the century, probably. As for the
+planets of neighboring stars we cannot say. We have no way of
+exploring them at present, but that is not the same as saying that we
+never will. If the past performance of the human race is any measure,
+they will likely fall to exploration within two hundred years.</p>
+
+<p>If you concede that it is possible that we can visit other star
+systems in a future not too distant, why then could we not have been
+visited some time in the past? It may tend to deflate our ego to think
+that there may be intelligent beings not too different from us who are
+advanced beyond us. It need not. One of the most striking features of
+Ezekiel's story, if it has been decoded correctly, is that these
+beings are very much like we are, right at the present time. That puts
+them three or four thousand years ahead of us, a very small amount
+indeed when we consider the long sweep of human life and development
+before the dawn of written history.</p>
+
+<p>We are so used to stories of "Bug-eyed Monsters" coming to Earth, that
+the idea of beings from other worlds looking and acting human seems
+fantastic. It should not. There is good sound scientific reason to
+believe that there is little chance of it being any other way. Life is
+a delicate and fragile thing when compared to cosmic extremes of
+temperature and environment in our universe. If life formed on earth
+as science now believes that it did, we must have had just the right
+size planet at just the right distance from a particular type of star.
+While such extremely narrow limits are going to reduce the number of
+places in the universe where life can develop, it is also going to
+limit the <i>differences</i>. In our creation things operate by rule. The
+rule is that in similar circumstance there are similar solutions to a
+problem. Man is the solution of the problem of building the highest
+form of life on Earth. On a similar planet we can expect to find a
+similar solution. This is simply the extension of the theory of
+<i>parallel evolution</i> to a cosmic scale.</p>
+
+<p>If then, we were visited by people from another world, what were they
+doing here? Strangely enough, there is considerable evidence of what
+they were up to from Ezekiel's own testimony. Let us suppose that
+these creatures were very much like we expect to be in five hundred
+years. They have come from some other star system in a ship whose
+principle of operation is as yet unknown to us. We can assume that it
+was a rather large ship, being that there were five beings on board at
+once, and we can presume that enough of a crew remained aboard to
+return it home in case something happened to the explorers. How would
+we proceed in such a case?</p>
+
+<p>It is not likely that such a large ship would be brought down to the
+surface of the earth. After arriving in the neighborhood of the earth,
+it would be put into orbit, and the surface of the earth would be
+studied through telescopes for days or weeks. The entire radio
+spectrum would be scanned to determine if there were inhabitants
+below, capable of operating electrical equipment. A small&mdash;manned or
+unmanned&mdash;flyer would be sent down into the upper atmosphere to
+determine the level of radioactivity, air components, spore and
+bacteria count and radio signals incapable of penetrating the
+atmosphere. From the ship the land areas would be mapped and studied.
+Any large object on the ground that appeared to be of an artificial
+nature would be given particular attention. During the night-time
+hours below, these objects and areas would be very carefully observed
+for signs of light.</p>
+
+<p>In the case of our visitors of twenty-six centuries ago, this is what
+they would have found: Quite a few artificial works could be seen.
+Cultivated fields and large buildings would be easily visible in many
+places around the eastern end of the Mediterranean. The Pyramids were
+old even then. (The Great Wall in China probably had not been
+started.) There would be no radio sounds, except for an occasional
+lightning click. We do not know how well their cities were lighted at
+night, but they were probably too dim to see. Tiny orange pinpoints of
+light from outdoor bonfires could probably be seen around the globe,
+but there would be more of them around the Mediterranean and in the
+East and Near East than anywhere else. The radioactivity level would
+be low. Our visitors would conclude that the inhabitants were either
+in the early stages of civilization, or were once highly civilized and
+now sunk back to a primitive stage. They would know that this was due
+to something other than atomic war.</p>
+
+<p>We have to conclude that these were moral beings. If the conditions
+below were as they seemed to be, that of an early civilization, they
+would not want to interfere. They would want to observe without being
+observed, so even if it were technically possible they would not want
+to bring a large ship down. They would send down as small and
+inconspicuous a vehicle as possible.</p>
+
+<p>We usually picture such a craft as a small version of the larger ship,
+or a large&mdash;by our standards&mdash;rocket, or an aircraft similar to our
+Dyna-soar. For people this advanced technologically something a lot
+simpler might be used. It might be an open vehicle, similar to our
+flying platforms, but with vastly more powerful nuclear power plants.
+The men going down would have to wear air-tight suits&mdash;spacesuits, and
+would have to leave them on all the time they were below, for fear of
+becoming infected with molds and viruses that the natives would long
+since have become immune to. One man, the pilot, would stay with the
+platform while the others did the observing and recording.</p>
+
+<p>The flying platform would have no need for rapid forward motion, at
+least inside the atmosphere and therefore would have little need for
+streamlining or protective covering for the passengers, who would
+carry their equipment with them. Most of the equipment for the survey
+would be built into the suits. They would each carry a set of portable
+helicopter attachments so they could cover more ground in a hurry.
+Like small helicopters of our time, these probably would have a rather
+limited speed and range, but they would be extremely maneuverable.</p>
+
+<p>The platform on the other hand, being nuclear powered, would probably
+be very powerful and have almost unlimited range, but it would be less
+maneuverable. The products of its exhaust might be radioactive and
+therefore its operators would be reluctant to operate it above or
+near the natives of the planet, or places that they frequented.</p>
+
+<p>As they push away from the mother-ship the spacemen would be in
+free-fall and would tend to "float" nearby until they turned the
+bottom side of the platform toward the direction of their orbit and
+applied power. They would then drop toward the surface, but with
+almost unlimited power available they could keep the downward
+component of their fall within limits and prevent overheating. They
+could probably be on the surface in less than an hour.</p>
+
+<p>The first and most likely area of exploration would be Egypt. The
+platform could be landed a few miles back from the Nile and be in
+completely unoccupied desert. The four helicopter-equipped explorers
+could put on their rotating-wing backpacks and by keeping low, come up
+very close to some center of civilization without being seen. By going
+up to a few thousand feet they could observe a fairly large area. Even
+if they were spotted, they would be small and unrecognizable, and
+cause a minimum amount of excitement.</p>
+
+<p>Like any tourist in any age they would probably be most interested in
+the territory around the pyramids. When they had finished here they
+might want to look over the country around what is now Bagdad, but
+<i>then</i> only near the capital city of Nebuchadnezzar's empire. This is
+about eight hundred miles away, an impractical trip by helicopter, so
+they would return to the platform, climb to a few hundred thousand
+feet, and scoot over in a few minutes. Here they would land again in
+some uninhabited spot and repeat the maneuver. This country was
+probably sprinkled with more people than they expected. Maybe that's
+why this is the legendary flying carpet country, or maybe not. At any
+rate, one lonely military prisoner, working by himself near the banks
+of a stream must have seen them. Even if they did notice him, what
+possible harm could he do? In the present state of the civilization
+who would remember what he said or even believe him? I do.</p>
+
+
+<h3>THE END</h3>
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 30252 ***</div>
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7dfcb6e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8165d00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9755dbb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c60f7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg b/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6fe1eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..386ff1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #30252 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/30252)
diff --git a/old/30252-h.zip b/old/30252-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0ae07e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/30252-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/30252-h/30252-h.htm b/old/30252-h/30252-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8bfe028
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/30252-h/30252-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,1323 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+ <head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" />
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of ... Ezekiel, by Arthur W. Orton
+ </title>
+ <style type="text/css">
+/*<![CDATA[ XML blockout */
+<!--
+body {
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ margin-right: 10%; background-color: #FFFFFF;
+}
+
+ h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
+ text-align: center; /* all headings centered */
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+p {
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ text-align: justify;
+ margin-bottom: .75em;
+}
+
+hr {
+ width: 33%;
+ margin-top: 2em;
+ margin-bottom: 2em;
+ margin-left: auto;
+ margin-right: auto;
+ clear: both;
+}
+
+
+.tr {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; margin-top: 5%; margin-bottom: 5%; padding: 2em; background-color: #f6f2f2; color: black; border: dotted black 1px;}
+
+.blockquot {
+ margin-left: 5%;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+}
+
+.f1 { margin-left:40%; font-size:larger; font-weight:bold; }
+.center {text-align: center;}
+
+/* Images */
+.figcenter {
+ margin: auto;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+.figleft {
+ float: left;
+ clear: left;
+ margin-left: 0;
+ margin-bottom: 0em;
+ margin-top: 0.25em;
+ margin-right: 0.25em;
+ padding: 0;
+ text-align: center;
+}
+
+
+/* XML end ]]>*/
+ </style>
+ </head>
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+Project Gutenberg's The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by Arthur W. Orton
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel
+
+Author: Arthur W. Orton
+
+Illustrator: Orton
+
+Release Date: October 14, 2009 [EBook #30252]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FOUR-FACED VISITORS OF EZEKIEL ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Sankar Viswanathan, Greg Weeks, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+<div class="tr"><p class="center">Transcriber's Note:</p>
+<p class="center">This etext was produced from Analog Science Fact &amp; Fiction March 1961. Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U.S. copyright on this publication was renewed.</p></div>
+<p>&nbsp;</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;">
+<img src="images/image_001.jpg" width="400" height="545" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<h1>THE<br />
+
+FOUR-FACED<br />
+
+VISITORS<br />
+
+OF ... EZEKIEL</h1>
+
+<p>&nbsp;</p>
+<h2>By ARTHUR W. ORTON</h2>
+<p>&nbsp;</p>
+<div class="blockquot"><p><i>Ezekiel, they say, "saw de wheel"&mdash;but he saw somewhat more
+than that. And Orton suggests that what he saw made
+perfectly good sense ... to the understanding!</i></p></div>
+<p>&nbsp;</p>
+<h3>Illustrated by Orton</h3>
+
+
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+<div class="figleft" style="width: 50px;">
+<img src="images/image_w.jpg" width="50" height="50" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+<p>e are told from our Sunday School days that the Bible is a "living
+book," the oldest of man's written works that is read and used anew,
+from generation to generation. It remains "living" because we are able
+to find new meaning to fit our daily lives. Although it is not the
+usual kind of new meaning, I believe that I have found something of
+the sort in the very old prophesies of Ezekiel.</p>
+
+<p>Bible scholars have long recognized the first chapter of Ezekiel as a
+strange and nearly unfathomable account of a vision. I suggest that it
+is strange only because it is written by a man far removed from us in
+time and experience, about a subject totally unfamiliar to men of his
+time. I do not think that this was a vision in the usual sense, nor
+was it meant to be mystical. This particular chapter has been called
+"Science fiction in the Bible" and many attempts have been made to
+unravel the meaning of the original author, along both spiritual and
+mundane lines. I am convinced that this chapter is the account of an
+actual happening; the landing of extraterrestial beings, reported by a
+careful, truthful and self-possessed observer.</p>
+
+<p>I am not a student of theology and therefore you may feel that I am
+being presumptive in attempting to throw light on a mystery as old and
+well-studied as Ezekiel's first chapter. I feel that any success that
+I may have in doing so will be due to the accident of my birth at the
+very beginning of an era when the events I have to describe are fact,
+or are about to become fact.</p>
+
+<p>If, as I believe, this is an account of an actual encounter with men
+from space, I may be better able to interpret the meaning than a
+student of theology, who by training and interest, is looking for a
+theological meaning. I have worked with mechanical things, and as an
+instructor of aircraft mechanics for most of my adult life. During
+this time I have had to untangle a lot of mechanical misconceptions
+and misunderstandings. I think that this gives me some insight into
+this problem.</p>
+
+<p>If you are not too familiar with the Old Testament, I suggest that you
+read through the first chapter of Ezekiel to get the feeling of the
+flow of words, and a general idea of what sort of material we will be
+covering. If you have done a considerable amount of reading in the
+Bible, I am sure you will notice at once how different and
+"un-Bible-like" this chapter sounds. It isn't long. The first chapter
+covers little more than one page. Don't expect to get a clear picture
+the first time through. It seems to have an elusive quality. About the
+time you feel that you have hold of a fact, it seems to be
+contradicted in a later verse. I am going to try to show you that this
+is due to your own preconceived notions of what some of the words and
+phrases mean. You, not Ezekiel, are supplying the contradictions.</p>
+
+<p>You will see that I am not going to make excuses for the words, as
+written. It is my belief that those who had the task of translating
+the Bible from its original tongue and re-copying it through the ages
+were particularly careful of this chapter because they did not
+understand it and were afraid of damaging it.</p>
+
+<p>Let us begin with the first verse of chapter one:</p>
+
+
+<h4><i>The Book of The Prophet</i></h4>
+<h3><i>EZEKIEL</i></h3>
+
+<p>803.<span class="f1">Chapter 1</span></p>
+
+<p><i>Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in
+the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river
+of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God.</i></p>
+
+
+<p><i>2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king
+Jehoiachin's captivity.</i></p>
+
+
+<p><i>3. The word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the
+son of Buzi, in the Land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the
+hand of the Lord was there upon him.</i></p>
+
+<p>This fixes the location of this incident on the outskirts of Bagdad.
+The Chebar is sometimes called "The Grand Canal of Bagdad." Although
+the entire book was supposed to have been written by Ezekiel, the
+second and third verses sound like an editor's note, inserted by a
+later writer.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a
+great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about
+it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the
+midst of the fire.</i></p>
+
+<p>Here is a man who had lived most of his life in arid desert country.
+He had probably seen whirlwinds of all kinds, from dust-devils to
+full-scale tornadoes. He was an accurate and honest observer, as we
+shall see later. If he said it was a whirlwind, it must have really
+been one, or at least it looked enough like one to fool him for a
+while. Notice that he does not say that it was high in the air, or
+that it came out of the sky, but, "... out of the north," or toward
+him from the north.</p>
+
+<p>The first thing that he noticed was that it had fire associated with
+it, a strange companion for a whirlwind. There is something strange
+about the fire itself. He says that it "infolds itself," which
+suggests a fire of more active nature than Ezekiel would be accustomed
+to. The association of fire and whirlwind must have struck him as
+peculiar.</p>
+
+<p>Also something amber colored was associated with the cloud and fire.
+He said that this color came "out of the midst," which might mean that
+it was above the cloud and flame, or appeared as the fire and cloud
+subsided, or blew to one side. Considering the detail he gives in
+later verses, this is quite vague, as it might be if he saw it from a
+distance.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>5. Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living
+creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a
+man.</i></p>
+
+<p>Why didn't he say that out came four men? Remember that he is telling
+this to very primitive, superstitious people. He was himself bred in a
+time when the supernatural was taken for granted. Under these
+conditions he has gone about as far as he could by saying that they
+certainly looked like four men. He does not say here that he took them
+for angels or any other kind of supernatural beings.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>6. And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings.</i></p>
+
+<p>This short verse is very clear, yet you wonder how a creature with
+four faces and four wings could possibly be taken for a man, even by
+you or me.</p>
+
+<p>Although he does not say so, we can imply that these creatures must
+have advanced much closer to him after they got out of the fire and
+cloud, for him to be able to see so much detail.</p>
+
+<p>Imagine the courage it took for him to stay put in order to observe
+these creatures. Notice also how objective he is, never mentioning his
+own feelings.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>7. And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was
+like the sole of a calf's foot; and they sparkled like the colour of
+burnished brass.</i></p>
+
+<p>Each verse of the description covers one or two parts of the
+creatures. When Ezekiel mentions more than one part it becomes
+confusing, so that one verse seems to contradict another. These can
+usually be sorted out however. Nowhere will you find a direct
+contradiction.</p>
+
+<p>Here he is describing the feet only. The word "straight" can be taken
+several ways. Does he mean <i>regular feet</i>, or feet that point straight
+forward, or feet that are straight up and down, like an elephant's?
+Probably he means regular, forward-pointing feet because he does not
+dwell on the point. In other places he leans heavily on simile to
+describe some unusual feature of the beings.</p>
+
+<p>The sole of the foot sounds as if it was heavily cleated. What then
+has he described in this verse? For a person living in a warm climate
+who had never seen any footwear more complicated than a sandal, he has
+described a highly polished leather, plastic or metal boot very well.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>8. And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four
+sides; and they four had their faces and their wings.</i></p>
+
+<p>Notice carefully that he is <i>not</i> saying that each creature had four
+man-like hands, one on each of four sides. He is saying that each has
+the normal number of hands and they are located <i>below</i> their wings.
+Remember that he was a careful observer and he had probably noticed
+that birds have wings <i>instead</i> of arms. These had both. In addition,
+he has given us another bit of information about the distribution of
+the wings. They do not appear to be arranged like a biplane, but each
+wing is at a ninety-degree angle from its neighboring wing like a
+helicopter.</p>
+
+<p>Ezekiel must have been something of a numerologist. He points out that
+there are four creatures, and each of the four has four faces each,
+and each has four wings each&mdash;but not four hands.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>9. Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they
+went; they went every one straight forward.</i></p>
+
+<p>He is not saying that the wings of one creature are joined to the
+wings of another creature. He is saying that each wing is joined to
+another wing, not directly to the creature.</p>
+
+<p>The second and third parts of this verse present a mystery. We do not
+know what the "theys" refer to. There are three "theys" in this verse,
+one after another and we are given very few clues to which refer to
+<i>creatures</i> and which refer to wings. The first "they" most likely is
+tied to the first part of the verse and therefore refers to the wings.
+Given this, there are still three interpretations:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>1. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The wings</i>
+went every one straight forward.</p>
+
+<p>2. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; <i>The
+wings</i> went every one straight forward.</p>
+
+<p>3. <i>The wings</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went; <i>The
+creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p></div>
+
+<p>None of these three statements make much of a point, whether the
+creatures have helicopter wings, or bird-angel wings. Let us assume
+then that the first "they" refers to the creatures:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>1. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the creatures</i> went;
+<i>The creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p>
+
+<p>2. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The
+wings</i> went every one straight forward.</p>
+
+<p>3. <i>The creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went; <i>The
+creatures</i> went every one straight forward.</p></div>
+
+<p>This last statement would pretty well describe the action of the
+blades of an inoperative helicopter being carried forward in a
+straight line. It would strike Ezekiel as odd that the wings might
+move and turn without turning the men under them. You might wonder why
+he would say "... wings went ..." instead of "... wings turned...."
+When a light breeze moves the blades of an inoperative helicopter the
+blades not only turn, but they change their pitch and plane in a most
+random manner.</p>
+
+<p>Although Ezekiel has not completed his description of the creatures,
+we can try now to form a picture of what he saw. No matter how we bend
+and squeeze, we are not going to get a Michelangelo-type angel. Look
+at figure one. Go back over the points that Ezekiel has described. You
+will see that it fits quite well.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>10. As for the likeness of the faces, they four had the face of a
+man, and the face of a lion, on the right side; and they four had the
+face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an
+eagle.</i></p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;">
+<img src="images/image_002.jpg" width="400" height="337" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p>This again does not sound very man-like. You wonder what could have
+kept him from pronouncing them demons. If you will study figure two,
+you will see what Ezekiel described. Now look at figure three. How
+much better could a man living six centuries before Christ describe
+figure three?</p>
+
+
+<p><i>11. Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; Two
+wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their
+bodies.</i></p>
+
+<p>See figure one again. The arrangement is like he describes. Notice
+that when he talks about "... the wings ..." of one creature, he
+apparently means the whole system of wings and attachments.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>12. And they went every one straight forward: wither the spirit was
+to go, they went; and they turned not as they went.</i></p>
+
+<p>Again we have trouble with the "theys." Notice however, that the first
+part of this verse repeats the last part of verse nine. If we were
+right in that verse, the first "they" in this refers to the creatures
+again. The second part of this verse contains a new idea, "whither the
+spirit was to go ...", has an opposite meaning from "... they went
+... straight forward ..." and, "... they turned not when they went."
+The first and last part sounds like the four creatures were marching
+purposefully in one direction. If then the second or middle part
+refers to the wings, we could read it:</p>
+
+<div class="blockquot"><p>"And <i>the creatures</i> went every one straight forward:
+whither the spirit was to go, <i>the wings</i> went; and <i>the
+creatures</i> turned not when <i>the wings</i> went."</p></div>
+
+<p>Again we have a picture of four men walking with their inoperative
+helicopters moving in several different ways as the breeze and the
+men's motions cause them to move slightly.</p>
+
+<p>Notice that Ezekiel seems to be more impressed with the wings and
+their motion than with any other feature of what he witnessed.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>13. As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was
+like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went
+up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and
+out of the fire went forth lightning.</i></p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 400px;">
+<img src="images/image_003.jpg" width="400" height="338" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+<p>Here he is describing their over-all appearance. We can assume that
+creatures that look like men but has a surface that resembles lights,
+coals and fire must be wearing suits with a brightly colored metallic
+surface. The modern anodized aluminium coatings glisten and sparkle
+with an effect like he describes. If these are space-suits, there is a
+good reason for making them gaudy. If they were worn in space while
+working on and around a ship, they should be as bright and
+eye-catching as possible, in the case the man became detached and
+floated away. He would be quite visible against the blackness of
+space.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>14. And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a
+flash of lightning.</i></p>
+
+<p>This might mean that they moved swiftly, but more than likely it means
+that they sparkled and shined on all sides, and this was visible as
+they moved about.</p>
+
+<p>This ends the description for a while. There are two later verses of
+description, but we will take this when we come to it. It is
+surprising that Ezekiel has organized his material so well. It reads
+like a scientific report. If he had headed the section that we just
+covered, "Description," we would not have been too surprised to find
+the following section headed, "Action":</p>
+
+
+<p><i>15. Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the
+earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.</i></p>
+
+<p>If we read Ezekiel correctly and the creatures did have helicopter
+attachments on their backs, we can assume that one of them now
+started his helicopter, which would appear as a "wheel" to Ezekiel,
+and probably surprised him greatly.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the
+colour of Beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance
+and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.</i></p>
+
+<p>Here we must digress in order to put ourselves into the life and time
+of this man because he has mentioned the wheel. A wheel did not have
+quite the same meaning for him as it does for you and I, living in a
+mechanical age. The wheel in 600 B.C. in the area around the eastern
+end of the Mediterranean, the most civilized part of the world at that
+time, had only a few very limited uses.</p>
+
+<p>One use, old even in Ezekiel's time was the potter's wheel; a simple
+platform mounted on crude vertical bearings so that it could be turned
+with one hand while the clay was worked with the other. From this the
+grindstone and the lapidary wheel developed for working metal and
+stone. These early machines probably employed some form of foot
+treadle but even these could not turn the wheel very fast. If the
+stone had a large enough diameter, it was possible to get the speed at
+the outer edge high enough to produce sparks when grinding hard
+material. The "work" took place at some distance from the axis,
+usually at the edge of the stone.</p>
+
+<p>The wheel we usually associate with ancient times is the cart wheel.
+In its earliest form it was a solid wheel, like those still in use in
+primitive sections of Mexico. Even with the cart wheel, ancient man
+would associate the edge of the wheel with the "work" of the wheel.
+This was the part that left a track in the mud and dust, crushed an
+occasional rock and fractured an occasional toe.</p>
+
+<p>In order to increase the efficiency of military chariots it was
+necessary to build a wheel that was lighter, yet just as strong as the
+solid model. This was first done by cutting out "lightening holes"
+between the hub and rim. Pressing this invention to the ultimate
+produced a spoked wheel. The Egyptians used a six-spoked chariot wheel
+thousands of years before Ezekiel's time, and the Greeks and others
+had four-spoke models. This was quite an invention and in addition to
+its useful aspects, it produced some rather unusual, even magical
+side-effects. As every child knows, if you turn your tricycle
+upside-down and spin the wheel, the spokes seem to vanish. All that
+can be seen is the rim and the parts of the hub near the center of
+rotation. No matter what shape the hub actually is, it too looks round
+like a wheel. It is very likely that such an effect was referred to as
+"a wheel within a wheel."</p>
+
+<p>In verse 16 Ezekiel says that, "wheels and their work was the colour
+of beryl ...", a blue-green color. This sounds like the emphasis is on
+the color at the <i>edge</i> of the wheel. This could be from a flame
+coming from jets on the tips of the rotors.</p>
+
+<p>All of the creatures must have started their rotors. ("... they four
+had one likeness.") They looked like "... a wheel in the middle of a
+wheel." Or the spinning spokes of a wheel. Notice also that he never
+mentions "wings" and "wheels" at the same time, for when one appears
+the other vanishes.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned
+not when they went.</i></p>
+
+<p>If four men were standing fairly close together on the ground with
+running helicopters, they would tend to spread out as they left the
+ground, so as to not run into each other. Moreover, with a helicopter,
+it is not necessary to <i>face</i> the direction you intend to go. This
+sounds like four men lifting off the ground, spreading out slightly
+and starting up and away, in formation.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful;
+and their rings were full of eyes round about them four.</i></p>
+
+<p>The four creatures are now high in the air above Ezekiel, a dreadful
+and awe-inspiring sight for a man of Ezekiel's time. Their "rings"
+obviously are the flames from their tip-jets, seen from below&mdash;the
+only part of the wheel now visible from far below. And the rings
+<i>would</i> be full of eyes. When a jet or rocket motor is operating there
+is a shock wave generated in the tailpipe which tends to cut the
+exhaust gas into segments. Time exposures of jet aircraft at night
+often show this. When a tip-jet is operating, these bright, evenly
+spaced spots give it the appearance of a string of pearls, "... full
+of eyes round about them...."</p>
+
+
+<p><i>19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went up by them:
+and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the
+wheels were lifted up.</i></p>
+
+<p>Ezekiel makes it clear that he does not know whether the men are
+lifting the wheels or the wheels lifting the men, but both went up
+together.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>20. Withersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their
+spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted over against them: for the
+spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels.</i></p>
+
+<p>This is a most sophisticated opinion. Although Ezekiel was describing
+only what he saw, he could not help but have some opinions about the
+creatures. In verse nineteen he makes it clear that he does not know
+whether man is lifting the machine, or the other way around, but here
+he makes it clear that whichever, there is no doubt that the creatures
+are <i>controlling</i>. They are not being carried off by the will of the
+wheel.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>21. When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood;
+and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted
+up over against them: for the spirit of the living creatures was in
+the wheels.</i></p>
+
+<p>This carries the idea of control one step farther. Not only are the
+men controlling the wheels, but they are self-controlled: They are
+flying in formation.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>22. And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living
+creatures was as the colour of terrible crystal, stretched forth over
+their heads above.</i></p>
+
+<p>Perhaps this verse was moved out of it's original position, for it
+returns to the description of the creatures. You may have noticed that
+many of the verses are written so that it is in part, an enlargement
+of the thought put forward in the preceding verse, and part new
+thought, to be enlarged upon in the following verse. Verses twenty-two
+and twenty-three <i>seem</i> to go together. Both would fit the rest of the
+chapter better if they were between verses twelve and thirteen.</p>
+
+<p>What is meant by "firmament"? These people had no term for a
+hollow-sphere. Most spherical objects were not hollow. They had no
+soap, so they had no soap bubbles. The most common thing to compare a
+hollow sphere to was the sky, the bowl of the heavens&mdash;the firmament.
+This crystal-clear bubble was over the heads of the creatures, one on
+each creature.</p>
+
+<p>We will come to the word firmament again, but notice that this is,
+"... the <i>likeness</i> of the firmament ...", not the firmament itself.
+Later verses speak only of the "firmament".</p>
+
+
+<p><i>23. And under the firmaments were their wings straight, the one
+toward the other: every one had two, which covered on this side, and
+every one had two which covered on that side, their bodies.</i></p>
+
+<p>If you changed "... under the firmament ..." to, "... below the sky"
+you would get a clearer picture. If you look at the picture of a
+house, the roof is, "below the sky," if you start at the top and work
+down. If you start at the ground and work up, the roof is, "at the
+top" of the house. Ezekiel's description of the wings, which is
+continued in this verse, concerns the wings "at the top." They are
+(connected), "... one toward the other, about like in figure one."</p>
+
+
+<p><i>24. And when they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the
+noise of great waters, like the voice of the Almighty, the voice of
+speech, as the noise of the host: when they stood they let down their
+wings.</i></p>
+
+<p>If you have ever stood near a running tip-jet, or any jet engine, I
+think you will know what Ezekiel means. The last statement is most
+interesting. It seems that when the creatures landed again they
+detached the helicopter mechanisms and set them down, as anyone will
+with a heavy back-pack who is resting or waiting.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>25. And there was a voice from the firmament that was over their
+heads, when they stood, and had let down their wings.</i></p>
+
+<p>This voice, or sound, was not from the <i>likeness</i> of the firmament,
+but from the sky, as they stood there with their wings off.</p>
+
+<p>This is the end of Ezekiel's attention to the four creatures.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>26. And above the firmament that was over their heads was the
+likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone; and upon
+the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man
+above upon it.</i></p>
+
+<p>Out of the sky comes a man on a green seat. But a throne is more than
+a chair. It is usually associated with a platform. This may be some
+kind of flying platform similar to those being tested for the
+transporting of infantry.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round
+about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and
+from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the
+appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about.</i></p>
+
+<p>Since this thing was high over their heads, and he saw fire round
+about it, the fire may have been on the under side. What he says about
+the man is very like what he said about the other four, except that he
+describes the man from the waist, up and down, as if he could not see
+the area near the man's waist.</p>
+
+
+<p><i>28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of
+rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was
+the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I
+saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one who spake.</i></p>
+
+<p>What prismatic effect, brighter than the outdoor desert sunshine is
+hard to imagine, but a large shining object close at hand would be
+pretty terrifying. It seems strange that Ezekiel would not throw
+himself upon the ground, after withstanding all he had seen up till
+now, but we must remember that a man seated on a throne, a flying
+throne at that might have a lot more meaning for him than it would for
+you and me. If this object happened to come down closer to him than
+the other creatures had, he might well have broken.</p>
+
+<p>We have now covered every verse of the first chapter quite thoroughly.
+Since the Book of Ezekiel contains forty-eight chapters, we might fear
+that this is just the beginning of a long and tiring study.
+Fortunately or unfortunately this is not the case. The second chapter
+begins:</p>
+
+
+<p><i>804.</i></p>
+
+<p><i>And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon they feet, and I will
+speak to thee.</i></p>
+
+<p><i>2. And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me
+upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me.</i></p>
+
+<p><i>3. And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of
+Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and
+their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day.</i></p>
+
+<p>This typically prophetic writing goes on for many pages, telling the
+woes and sins of the Israelites. Reference is made in a few places to
+the material in the first chapter, but even this dies out before the
+end of the book.</p>
+
+<p>No mention is made again of the living creatures till chapter three
+where the following verse is found:</p>
+
+
+<p><i>13. I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that
+touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against them,
+and a noise of great rushing.</i></p>
+
+<p>This combines some of the ideas of earlier verses without adding any
+new information. Notice that writer has the notion that the wings of
+one creature touched those of another, or that the creatures touched
+one another.</p>
+
+<p>This verse is typical of several more scattered throughout the first
+third of the book. All the verses mentioning the living creatures
+after the first chapter are more dramatic and all fail to continue the
+style of a careful reporter. No new ideas are advanced, but some
+rather unusual contradictions are introduced, by using several parts
+of several verses of Chapter One. Chapter Ten reads like an attempt at
+rephrasing Chapter One and Chapter Eleven is the last mention of the
+living creatures in the entire book.</p>
+
+<p>Although it contains no further information on the living creatures,
+Chapter Three has a verse that should be mentioned. Verse fifteen
+sounds like a fitting conclusion to the first chapter:</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="width: 500px;">
+<img src="images/image_004.jpg" width="500" height="370" alt="" title="" />
+</div>
+
+
+<p><i>15. Then I came to them of the captivity at Tel-Abib, that dwelt by
+the river Chebar, and I sat where they sat, and remained there
+astonished among them for seven days.</i></p>
+
+<p>Just what do we have? We have a description of four spacesuited and
+helicopter-equipped men, getting off of, or out of something that
+landed in a cloud of dust or smoke. The four men start their
+helicopters, take off and fly to some height. On returning to the
+ground they remove their flying gear and wait. They are met by a fifth
+man, riding on a flying platform. Such an event would cause some
+interest in any community today, but in those times it could only be
+interpreted as supernatural&mdash;a miracle. The miracle may well be that
+the story has been preserved for us, twenty-six centuries later.</p>
+
+<p>A word for word interpretation is only part of the oddity of this
+chapter. Several other aspects are worth pondering. The whole chapter
+has a well-worn feeling, as though the author had told and re-told it
+many times. It reads like a deposition, taken down by a police
+officer, after the witness, who prides himself on truthfulness, has
+told the story over and over to his incredulous friends. It has a
+certain poetic beauty. It has the style of one who is telling you the
+truth, no matter whether you are going to believe it or not. It is
+the presentation of a tableau that makes no sense to the man who
+witnessed it, or to those to whom he is describing it.</p>
+
+<p>The product of a man's imagination is tied to his own experience, his
+own time. A wonderful tale of the supernatural may sound very
+imaginative to the contemporary of the teller, but it will date itself
+to a later generation. The lives of the Greek gods are related to the
+lives of the early Greeks. An imaginative science-fiction writer such
+as Jules Verne is limited in the same way. As good as he was,
+experience has set an outer limit to his imagination. Ezekiel's tale
+is not in this class. To his contemporaries, it was out of step with
+reality. To us it is real enough, but out of step with time. The most
+credible explanation is that it really happened.</p>
+
+<hr style="width: 45%;" />
+
+<p>Perhaps there are some points of my interpretation that you do not
+agree with, but as a whole the story does hang together rather well.
+If you have the feeling that it would be easy to fit the words around
+an entirely different set of circumstances, I suggest that you try.</p>
+
+<p>It is interesting to know that some years ago a verbal battle raged in
+theological circles as to whether Ezekiel wrote the Book of Ezekiel.
+One school of thought held that he did, while the other school held
+that the first chapter was a "forgery," written in the third century
+before Christ, and tacked on as a sort of "leader" to Ezekiel's book.
+For our purposes it cannot be a forgery. It makes little difference
+how long ago it was written, so long as it was not since World War II!</p>
+
+<p>Suppose Ezekiel or some ancient man actually saw what I have proposed.
+What are the possible explanations? Is it possible that some ancient
+race, unknown to us, could have developed such equipment? It is not
+likely. During the last one hundred years we have been prodding about
+in the earth and finding so many ancient records that someone else
+besides Ezekiel would certainly have left us a report on them.</p>
+
+<p>The things that were science fiction twenty years ago are solid fact
+now. We know that a landing on the Moon is only a question of time, a
+few years at the most. The planets of our Solar System will follow, at
+least some before the turn of the century, probably. As for the
+planets of neighboring stars we cannot say. We have no way of
+exploring them at present, but that is not the same as saying that we
+never will. If the past performance of the human race is any measure,
+they will likely fall to exploration within two hundred years.</p>
+
+<p>If you concede that it is possible that we can visit other star
+systems in a future not too distant, why then could we not have been
+visited some time in the past? It may tend to deflate our ego to think
+that there may be intelligent beings not too different from us who are
+advanced beyond us. It need not. One of the most striking features of
+Ezekiel's story, if it has been decoded correctly, is that these
+beings are very much like we are, right at the present time. That puts
+them three or four thousand years ahead of us, a very small amount
+indeed when we consider the long sweep of human life and development
+before the dawn of written history.</p>
+
+<p>We are so used to stories of "Bug-eyed Monsters" coming to Earth, that
+the idea of beings from other worlds looking and acting human seems
+fantastic. It should not. There is good sound scientific reason to
+believe that there is little chance of it being any other way. Life is
+a delicate and fragile thing when compared to cosmic extremes of
+temperature and environment in our universe. If life formed on earth
+as science now believes that it did, we must have had just the right
+size planet at just the right distance from a particular type of star.
+While such extremely narrow limits are going to reduce the number of
+places in the universe where life can develop, it is also going to
+limit the <i>differences</i>. In our creation things operate by rule. The
+rule is that in similar circumstance there are similar solutions to a
+problem. Man is the solution of the problem of building the highest
+form of life on Earth. On a similar planet we can expect to find a
+similar solution. This is simply the extension of the theory of
+<i>parallel evolution</i> to a cosmic scale.</p>
+
+<p>If then, we were visited by people from another world, what were they
+doing here? Strangely enough, there is considerable evidence of what
+they were up to from Ezekiel's own testimony. Let us suppose that
+these creatures were very much like we expect to be in five hundred
+years. They have come from some other star system in a ship whose
+principle of operation is as yet unknown to us. We can assume that it
+was a rather large ship, being that there were five beings on board at
+once, and we can presume that enough of a crew remained aboard to
+return it home in case something happened to the explorers. How would
+we proceed in such a case?</p>
+
+<p>It is not likely that such a large ship would be brought down to the
+surface of the earth. After arriving in the neighborhood of the earth,
+it would be put into orbit, and the surface of the earth would be
+studied through telescopes for days or weeks. The entire radio
+spectrum would be scanned to determine if there were inhabitants
+below, capable of operating electrical equipment. A small&mdash;manned or
+unmanned&mdash;flyer would be sent down into the upper atmosphere to
+determine the level of radioactivity, air components, spore and
+bacteria count and radio signals incapable of penetrating the
+atmosphere. From the ship the land areas would be mapped and studied.
+Any large object on the ground that appeared to be of an artificial
+nature would be given particular attention. During the night-time
+hours below, these objects and areas would be very carefully observed
+for signs of light.</p>
+
+<p>In the case of our visitors of twenty-six centuries ago, this is what
+they would have found: Quite a few artificial works could be seen.
+Cultivated fields and large buildings would be easily visible in many
+places around the eastern end of the Mediterranean. The Pyramids were
+old even then. (The Great Wall in China probably had not been
+started.) There would be no radio sounds, except for an occasional
+lightning click. We do not know how well their cities were lighted at
+night, but they were probably too dim to see. Tiny orange pinpoints of
+light from outdoor bonfires could probably be seen around the globe,
+but there would be more of them around the Mediterranean and in the
+East and Near East than anywhere else. The radioactivity level would
+be low. Our visitors would conclude that the inhabitants were either
+in the early stages of civilization, or were once highly civilized and
+now sunk back to a primitive stage. They would know that this was due
+to something other than atomic war.</p>
+
+<p>We have to conclude that these were moral beings. If the conditions
+below were as they seemed to be, that of an early civilization, they
+would not want to interfere. They would want to observe without being
+observed, so even if it were technically possible they would not want
+to bring a large ship down. They would send down as small and
+inconspicuous a vehicle as possible.</p>
+
+<p>We usually picture such a craft as a small version of the larger ship,
+or a large&mdash;by our standards&mdash;rocket, or an aircraft similar to our
+Dyna-soar. For people this advanced technologically something a lot
+simpler might be used. It might be an open vehicle, similar to our
+flying platforms, but with vastly more powerful nuclear power plants.
+The men going down would have to wear air-tight suits&mdash;spacesuits, and
+would have to leave them on all the time they were below, for fear of
+becoming infected with molds and viruses that the natives would long
+since have become immune to. One man, the pilot, would stay with the
+platform while the others did the observing and recording.</p>
+
+<p>The flying platform would have no need for rapid forward motion, at
+least inside the atmosphere and therefore would have little need for
+streamlining or protective covering for the passengers, who would
+carry their equipment with them. Most of the equipment for the survey
+would be built into the suits. They would each carry a set of portable
+helicopter attachments so they could cover more ground in a hurry.
+Like small helicopters of our time, these probably would have a rather
+limited speed and range, but they would be extremely maneuverable.</p>
+
+<p>The platform on the other hand, being nuclear powered, would probably
+be very powerful and have almost unlimited range, but it would be less
+maneuverable. The products of its exhaust might be radioactive and
+therefore its operators would be reluctant to operate it above or
+near the natives of the planet, or places that they frequented.</p>
+
+<p>As they push away from the mother-ship the spacemen would be in
+free-fall and would tend to "float" nearby until they turned the
+bottom side of the platform toward the direction of their orbit and
+applied power. They would then drop toward the surface, but with
+almost unlimited power available they could keep the downward
+component of their fall within limits and prevent overheating. They
+could probably be on the surface in less than an hour.</p>
+
+<p>The first and most likely area of exploration would be Egypt. The
+platform could be landed a few miles back from the Nile and be in
+completely unoccupied desert. The four helicopter-equipped explorers
+could put on their rotating-wing backpacks and by keeping low, come up
+very close to some center of civilization without being seen. By going
+up to a few thousand feet they could observe a fairly large area. Even
+if they were spotted, they would be small and unrecognizable, and
+cause a minimum amount of excitement.</p>
+
+<p>Like any tourist in any age they would probably be most interested in
+the territory around the pyramids. When they had finished here they
+might want to look over the country around what is now Bagdad, but
+<i>then</i> only near the capital city of Nebuchadnezzar's empire. This is
+about eight hundred miles away, an impractical trip by helicopter, so
+they would return to the platform, climb to a few hundred thousand
+feet, and scoot over in a few minutes. Here they would land again in
+some uninhabited spot and repeat the maneuver. This country was
+probably sprinkled with more people than they expected. Maybe that's
+why this is the legendary flying carpet country, or maybe not. At any
+rate, one lonely military prisoner, working by himself near the banks
+of a stream must have seen them. Even if they did notice him, what
+possible harm could he do? In the present state of the civilization
+who would remember what he said or even believe him? I do.</p>
+
+
+<h3>THE END</h3>
+
+<hr style="width: 65%;" />
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by
+Arthur W. Orton
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FOUR-FACED VISITORS OF EZEKIEL ***
+
+***** This file should be named 30252-h.htm or 30252-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/0/2/5/30252/
+
+Produced by Sankar Viswanathan, Greg Weeks, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7dfcb6e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_001.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8165d00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_002.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9755dbb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_003.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c60f7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_004.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg b/old/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6fe1eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/30252-h/images/image_w.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/30252.txt b/old/30252.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b868839
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/30252.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1230 @@
+Project Gutenberg's The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by Arthur W. Orton
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel
+
+Author: Arthur W. Orton
+
+Illustrator: Orton
+
+Release Date: October 14, 2009 [EBook #30252]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FOUR-FACED VISITORS OF EZEKIEL ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Sankar Viswanathan, Greg Weeks, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Transcriber's Note:
+
+ This etext was produced from Analog Science Fact & Fiction March 1961.
+ Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U.S. copyright
+ on this publication was renewed.
+
+
+
+ THE
+
+ FOUR-FACED
+
+ VISITORS
+
+ OF ... EZEKIEL
+
+
+
+
+ By ARTHUR W. ORTON
+
+
+
+ _Ezekiel, they say, "saw de wheel"--but he saw somewhat more
+ than that. And Orton suggests that what he saw made
+ perfectly good sense ... to the understanding!_
+
+
+
+ Illustrated by Orton
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+
+
+We are told from our Sunday School days that the Bible is a "living
+book," the oldest of man's written works that is read and used anew,
+from generation to generation. It remains "living" because we are able
+to find new meaning to fit our daily lives. Although it is not the
+usual kind of new meaning, I believe that I have found something of
+the sort in the very old prophesies of Ezekiel.
+
+Bible scholars have long recognized the first chapter of Ezekiel as a
+strange and nearly unfathomable account of a vision. I suggest that it
+is strange only because it is written by a man far removed from us in
+time and experience, about a subject totally unfamiliar to men of his
+time. I do not think that this was a vision in the usual sense, nor
+was it meant to be mystical. This particular chapter has been called
+"Science fiction in the Bible" and many attempts have been made to
+unravel the meaning of the original author, along both spiritual and
+mundane lines. I am convinced that this chapter is the account of an
+actual happening; the landing of extraterrestial beings, reported by a
+careful, truthful and self-possessed observer.
+
+I am not a student of theology and therefore you may feel that I am
+being presumptive in attempting to throw light on a mystery as old and
+well-studied as Ezekiel's first chapter. I feel that any success that
+I may have in doing so will be due to the accident of my birth at the
+very beginning of an era when the events I have to describe are fact,
+or are about to become fact.
+
+If, as I believe, this is an account of an actual encounter with men
+from space, I may be better able to interpret the meaning than a
+student of theology, who by training and interest, is looking for a
+theological meaning. I have worked with mechanical things, and as an
+instructor of aircraft mechanics for most of my adult life. During
+this time I have had to untangle a lot of mechanical misconceptions
+and misunderstandings. I think that this gives me some insight into
+this problem.
+
+If you are not too familiar with the Old Testament, I suggest that you
+read through the first chapter of Ezekiel to get the feeling of the
+flow of words, and a general idea of what sort of material we will be
+covering. If you have done a considerable amount of reading in the
+Bible, I am sure you will notice at once how different and
+"un-Bible-like" this chapter sounds. It isn't long. The first chapter
+covers little more than one page. Don't expect to get a clear picture
+the first time through. It seems to have an elusive quality. About the
+time you feel that you have hold of a fact, it seems to be
+contradicted in a later verse. I am going to try to show you that this
+is due to your own preconceived notions of what some of the words and
+phrases mean. You, not Ezekiel, are supplying the contradictions.
+
+You will see that I am not going to make excuses for the words, as
+written. It is my belief that those who had the task of translating
+the Bible from its original tongue and re-copying it through the ages
+were particularly careful of this chapter because they did not
+understand it and were afraid of damaging it.
+
+Let us begin with the first verse of chapter one:
+
+
+_The Book of The Prophet EZEKIEL_
+
+
+803. Chapter 1
+
+
+_Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in
+the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river
+of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God._
+
+
+_2. In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of king
+Jehoiachin's captivity._
+
+
+_3. The word of the Lord came expressly unto Ezekiel the priest, the
+son of Buzi, in the Land of the Chaldeans by the river Chebar; and the
+hand of the Lord was there upon him._
+
+This fixes the location of this incident on the outskirts of Bagdad.
+The Chebar is sometimes called "The Grand Canal of Bagdad." Although
+the entire book was supposed to have been written by Ezekiel, the
+second and third verses sound like an editor's note, inserted by a
+later writer.
+
+
+_4. And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a
+great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about
+it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the
+midst of the fire._
+
+Here is a man who had lived most of his life in arid desert country.
+He had probably seen whirlwinds of all kinds, from dust-devils to
+full-scale tornadoes. He was an accurate and honest observer, as we
+shall see later. If he said it was a whirlwind, it must have really
+been one, or at least it looked enough like one to fool him for a
+while. Notice that he does not say that it was high in the air, or
+that it came out of the sky, but, "... out of the north," or toward
+him from the north.
+
+The first thing that he noticed was that it had fire associated with
+it, a strange companion for a whirlwind. There is something strange
+about the fire itself. He says that it "infolds itself," which
+suggests a fire of more active nature than Ezekiel would be accustomed
+to. The association of fire and whirlwind must have struck him as
+peculiar.
+
+Also something amber colored was associated with the cloud and fire.
+He said that this color came "out of the midst," which might mean that
+it was above the cloud and flame, or appeared as the fire and cloud
+subsided, or blew to one side. Considering the detail he gives in
+later verses, this is quite vague, as it might be if he saw it from a
+distance.
+
+
+_5. Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living
+creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a
+man._
+
+Why didn't he say that out came four men? Remember that he is telling
+this to very primitive, superstitious people. He was himself bred in a
+time when the supernatural was taken for granted. Under these
+conditions he has gone about as far as he could by saying that they
+certainly looked like four men. He does not say here that he took them
+for angels or any other kind of supernatural beings.
+
+
+_6. And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings._
+
+This short verse is very clear, yet you wonder how a creature with
+four faces and four wings could possibly be taken for a man, even by
+you or me.
+
+Although he does not say so, we can imply that these creatures must
+have advanced much closer to him after they got out of the fire and
+cloud, for him to be able to see so much detail.
+
+Imagine the courage it took for him to stay put in order to observe
+these creatures. Notice also how objective he is, never mentioning his
+own feelings.
+
+
+_7. And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was
+like the sole of a calf's foot; and they sparkled like the colour of
+burnished brass._
+
+Each verse of the description covers one or two parts of the
+creatures. When Ezekiel mentions more than one part it becomes
+confusing, so that one verse seems to contradict another. These can
+usually be sorted out however. Nowhere will you find a direct
+contradiction.
+
+Here he is describing the feet only. The word "straight" can be taken
+several ways. Does he mean _regular feet_, or feet that point straight
+forward, or feet that are straight up and down, like an elephant's?
+Probably he means regular, forward-pointing feet because he does not
+dwell on the point. In other places he leans heavily on simile to
+describe some unusual feature of the beings.
+
+The sole of the foot sounds as if it was heavily cleated. What then
+has he described in this verse? For a person living in a warm climate
+who had never seen any footwear more complicated than a sandal, he has
+described a highly polished leather, plastic or metal boot very well.
+
+
+_8. And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four
+sides; and they four had their faces and their wings._
+
+Notice carefully that he is _not_ saying that each creature had four
+man-like hands, one on each of four sides. He is saying that each has
+the normal number of hands and they are located _below_ their wings.
+Remember that he was a careful observer and he had probably noticed
+that birds have wings _instead_ of arms. These had both. In addition,
+he has given us another bit of information about the distribution of
+the wings. They do not appear to be arranged like a biplane, but each
+wing is at a ninety-degree angle from its neighboring wing like a
+helicopter.
+
+Ezekiel must have been something of a numerologist. He points out that
+there are four creatures, and each of the four has four faces each,
+and each has four wings each--but not four hands.
+
+
+_9. Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they
+went; they went every one straight forward._
+
+He is not saying that the wings of one creature are joined to the
+wings of another creature. He is saying that each wing is joined to
+another wing, not directly to the creature.
+
+The second and third parts of this verse present a mystery. We do not
+know what the "theys" refer to. There are three "theys" in this verse,
+one after another and we are given very few clues to which refer to
+_creatures_ and which refer to wings. The first "they" most likely is
+tied to the first part of the verse and therefore refers to the wings.
+Given this, there are still three interpretations:
+
+ 1. _The wings_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The wings_
+ went every one straight forward.
+
+ 2. _The wings_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; _The
+ wings_ went every one straight forward.
+
+ 3. _The wings_ turned not when _the creatures_ went; _The
+ creatures_ went every one straight forward.
+
+None of these three statements make much of a point, whether the
+creatures have helicopter wings, or bird-angel wings. Let us assume
+then that the first "they" refers to the creatures:
+
+ 1. _The creatures_ turned not when _the creatures_ went;
+ _The creatures_ went every one straight forward.
+
+ 2. _The creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The
+ wings_ went every one straight forward.
+
+ 3. _The creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went; _The
+ creatures_ went every one straight forward.
+
+This last statement would pretty well describe the action of the
+blades of an inoperative helicopter being carried forward in a
+straight line. It would strike Ezekiel as odd that the wings might
+move and turn without turning the men under them. You might wonder why
+he would say "... wings went ..." instead of "... wings turned...."
+When a light breeze moves the blades of an inoperative helicopter the
+blades not only turn, but they change their pitch and plane in a most
+random manner.
+
+Although Ezekiel has not completed his description of the creatures,
+we can try now to form a picture of what he saw. No matter how we bend
+and squeeze, we are not going to get a Michelangelo-type angel. Look
+at figure one. Go back over the points that Ezekiel has described. You
+will see that it fits quite well.
+
+
+_10. As for the likeness of the faces, they four had the face of a
+man, and the face of a lion, on the right side; and they four had the
+face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an
+eagle._
+
+[Illustration]
+
+This again does not sound very man-like. You wonder what could have
+kept him from pronouncing them demons. If you will study figure two,
+you will see what Ezekiel described. Now look at figure three. How
+much better could a man living six centuries before Christ describe
+figure three?
+
+
+_11. Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; Two
+wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their
+bodies._
+
+See figure one again. The arrangement is like he describes. Notice
+that when he talks about "... the wings ..." of one creature, he
+apparently means the whole system of wings and attachments.
+
+
+_12. And they went every one straight forward: wither the spirit was
+to go, they went; and they turned not as they went._
+
+Again we have trouble with the "theys." Notice however, that the first part
+of this verse repeats the last part of verse nine. If we were right in that
+verse, the first "they" in this refers to the creatures again. The second
+part of this verse contains a new idea, "whither the spirit was to go ...",
+has an opposite meaning from "... they went ... straight forward ..."
+and, "... they turned not when they went." The first and last part sounds
+like the four creatures were marching purposefully in one direction. If
+then the second or middle part refers to the wings, we could read it:
+
+ "And _the creatures_ went every one straight forward:
+ whither the spirit was to go, _the wings_ went; and _the
+ creatures_ turned not when _the wings_ went."
+
+Again we have a picture of four men walking with their inoperative
+helicopters moving in several different ways as the breeze and the
+men's motions cause them to move slightly.
+
+Notice that Ezekiel seems to be more impressed with the wings and
+their motion than with any other feature of what he witnessed.
+
+
+_13. As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was
+like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went
+up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and
+out of the fire went forth lightning._
+
+[Illustration]
+
+Here he is describing their over-all appearance. We can assume that
+creatures that look like men but has a surface that resembles lights,
+coals and fire must be wearing suits with a brightly colored metallic
+surface. The modern anodized aluminium coatings glisten and sparkle
+with an effect like he describes. If these are space-suits, there is a
+good reason for making them gaudy. If they were worn in space while
+working on and around a ship, they should be as bright and
+eye-catching as possible, in the case the man became detached and
+floated away. He would be quite visible against the blackness of
+space.
+
+
+_14. And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a
+flash of lightning._
+
+This might mean that they moved swiftly, but more than likely it means
+that they sparkled and shined on all sides, and this was visible as
+they moved about.
+
+This ends the description for a while. There are two later verses of
+description, but we will take this when we come to it. It is
+surprising that Ezekiel has organized his material so well. It reads
+like a scientific report. If he had headed the section that we just
+covered, "Description," we would not have been too surprised to find
+the following section headed, "Action":
+
+
+_15. Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the
+earth by the living creatures, with his four faces._
+
+If we read Ezekiel correctly and the creatures did have helicopter
+attachments on their backs, we can assume that one of them now
+started his helicopter, which would appear as a "wheel" to Ezekiel,
+and probably surprised him greatly.
+
+
+_16. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the
+colour of Beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance
+and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel._
+
+Here we must digress in order to put ourselves into the life and time
+of this man because he has mentioned the wheel. A wheel did not have
+quite the same meaning for him as it does for you and I, living in a
+mechanical age. The wheel in 600 B.C. in the area around the eastern
+end of the Mediterranean, the most civilized part of the world at that
+time, had only a few very limited uses.
+
+One use, old even in Ezekiel's time was the potter's wheel; a simple
+platform mounted on crude vertical bearings so that it could be turned
+with one hand while the clay was worked with the other. From this the
+grindstone and the lapidary wheel developed for working metal and
+stone. These early machines probably employed some form of foot
+treadle but even these could not turn the wheel very fast. If the
+stone had a large enough diameter, it was possible to get the speed at
+the outer edge high enough to produce sparks when grinding hard
+material. The "work" took place at some distance from the axis,
+usually at the edge of the stone.
+
+The wheel we usually associate with ancient times is the cart wheel.
+In its earliest form it was a solid wheel, like those still in use in
+primitive sections of Mexico. Even with the cart wheel, ancient man
+would associate the edge of the wheel with the "work" of the wheel.
+This was the part that left a track in the mud and dust, crushed an
+occasional rock and fractured an occasional toe.
+
+In order to increase the efficiency of military chariots it was
+necessary to build a wheel that was lighter, yet just as strong as the
+solid model. This was first done by cutting out "lightening holes"
+between the hub and rim. Pressing this invention to the ultimate
+produced a spoked wheel. The Egyptians used a six-spoked chariot wheel
+thousands of years before Ezekiel's time, and the Greeks and others
+had four-spoke models. This was quite an invention and in addition to
+its useful aspects, it produced some rather unusual, even magical
+side-effects. As every child knows, if you turn your tricycle
+upside-down and spin the wheel, the spokes seem to vanish. All that
+can be seen is the rim and the parts of the hub near the center of
+rotation. No matter what shape the hub actually is, it too looks round
+like a wheel. It is very likely that such an effect was referred to as
+"a wheel within a wheel."
+
+In verse 16 Ezekiel says that, "wheels and their work was the colour
+of beryl ...", a blue-green color. This sounds like the emphasis is on
+the color at the _edge_ of the wheel. This could be from a flame
+coming from jets on the tips of the rotors.
+
+All of the creatures must have started their rotors. ("... they four
+had one likeness.") They looked like "... a wheel in the middle of a
+wheel." Or the spinning spokes of a wheel. Notice also that he never
+mentions "wings" and "wheels" at the same time, for when one appears
+the other vanishes.
+
+
+_17. When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned
+not when they went._
+
+If four men were standing fairly close together on the ground with
+running helicopters, they would tend to spread out as they left the
+ground, so as to not run into each other. Moreover, with a helicopter,
+it is not necessary to _face_ the direction you intend to go. This
+sounds like four men lifting off the ground, spreading out slightly
+and starting up and away, in formation.
+
+
+_18. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful;
+and their rings were full of eyes round about them four._
+
+The four creatures are now high in the air above Ezekiel, a dreadful
+and awe-inspiring sight for a man of Ezekiel's time. Their "rings"
+obviously are the flames from their tip-jets, seen from below--the
+only part of the wheel now visible from far below. And the rings
+_would_ be full of eyes. When a jet or rocket motor is operating there
+is a shock wave generated in the tailpipe which tends to cut the
+exhaust gas into segments. Time exposures of jet aircraft at night
+often show this. When a tip-jet is operating, these bright, evenly
+spaced spots give it the appearance of a string of pearls, "... full
+of eyes round about them...."
+
+
+_19. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went up by them:
+and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the
+wheels were lifted up._
+
+Ezekiel makes it clear that he does not know whether the men are
+lifting the wheels or the wheels lifting the men, but both went up
+together.
+
+
+_20. Withersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their
+spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted over against them: for the
+spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels._
+
+This is a most sophisticated opinion. Although Ezekiel was describing
+only what he saw, he could not help but have some opinions about the
+creatures. In verse nineteen he makes it clear that he does not know
+whether man is lifting the machine, or the other way around, but here
+he makes it clear that whichever, there is no doubt that the creatures
+are _controlling_. They are not being carried off by the will of the
+wheel.
+
+
+_21. When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood;
+and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted
+up over against them: for the spirit of the living creatures was in
+the wheels._
+
+This carries the idea of control one step farther. Not only are the
+men controlling the wheels, but they are self-controlled: They are
+flying in formation.
+
+
+_22. And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living
+creatures was as the colour of terrible crystal, stretched forth over
+their heads above._
+
+Perhaps this verse was moved out of it's original position, for it
+returns to the description of the creatures. You may have noticed that
+many of the verses are written so that it is in part, an enlargement
+of the thought put forward in the preceding verse, and part new
+thought, to be enlarged upon in the following verse. Verses twenty-two
+and twenty-three _seem_ to go together. Both would fit the rest of the
+chapter better if they were between verses twelve and thirteen.
+
+What is meant by "firmament"? These people had no term for a
+hollow-sphere. Most spherical objects were not hollow. They had no
+soap, so they had no soap bubbles. The most common thing to compare a
+hollow sphere to was the sky, the bowl of the heavens--the firmament.
+This crystal-clear bubble was over the heads of the creatures, one on
+each creature.
+
+We will come to the word firmament again, but notice that this is,
+"... the _likeness_ of the firmament ...", not the firmament itself.
+Later verses speak only of the "firmament".
+
+
+_23. And under the firmaments were their wings straight, the one
+toward the other: every one had two, which covered on this side, and
+every one had two which covered on that side, their bodies._
+
+If you changed "... under the firmament ..." to, "... below the sky"
+you would get a clearer picture. If you look at the picture of a
+house, the roof is, "below the sky," if you start at the top and work
+down. If you start at the ground and work up, the roof is, "at the
+top" of the house. Ezekiel's description of the wings, which is
+continued in this verse, concerns the wings "at the top." They are
+(connected), "... one toward the other, about like in figure one."
+
+
+_24. And when they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the
+noise of great waters, like the voice of the Almighty, the voice of
+speech, as the noise of the host: when they stood they let down their
+wings._
+
+If you have ever stood near a running tip-jet, or any jet engine, I
+think you will know what Ezekiel means. The last statement is most
+interesting. It seems that when the creatures landed again they
+detached the helicopter mechanisms and set them down, as anyone will
+with a heavy back-pack who is resting or waiting.
+
+
+_25. And there was a voice from the firmament that was over their
+heads, when they stood, and had let down their wings._
+
+This voice, or sound, was not from the _likeness_ of the firmament,
+but from the sky, as they stood there with their wings off.
+
+This is the end of Ezekiel's attention to the four creatures.
+
+
+_26. And above the firmament that was over their heads was the
+likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone; and upon
+the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man
+above upon it._
+
+Out of the sky comes a man on a green seat. But a throne is more than
+a chair. It is usually associated with a platform. This may be some
+kind of flying platform similar to those being tested for the
+transporting of infantry.
+
+
+_27. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round
+about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and
+from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the
+appearance of fire, and it had brightness round about._
+
+Since this thing was high over their heads, and he saw fire round
+about it, the fire may have been on the under side. What he says about
+the man is very like what he said about the other four, except that he
+describes the man from the waist, up and down, as if he could not see
+the area near the man's waist.
+
+
+_28. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of
+rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was
+the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I
+saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one who spake._
+
+What prismatic effect, brighter than the outdoor desert sunshine is
+hard to imagine, but a large shining object close at hand would be
+pretty terrifying. It seems strange that Ezekiel would not throw
+himself upon the ground, after withstanding all he had seen up till
+now, but we must remember that a man seated on a throne, a flying
+throne at that might have a lot more meaning for him than it would for
+you and me. If this object happened to come down closer to him than
+the other creatures had, he might well have broken.
+
+We have now covered every verse of the first chapter quite thoroughly.
+Since the Book of Ezekiel contains forty-eight chapters, we might fear
+that this is just the beginning of a long and tiring study.
+Fortunately or unfortunately this is not the case. The second chapter
+begins:
+
+
+_804._
+
+_And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon they feet, and I will
+speak to thee._
+
+_2. And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me
+upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me._
+
+_3. And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of
+Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and
+their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day._
+
+This typically prophetic writing goes on for many pages, telling the
+woes and sins of the Israelites. Reference is made in a few places to
+the material in the first chapter, but even this dies out before the
+end of the book.
+
+No mention is made again of the living creatures till chapter three
+where the following verse is found:
+
+
+_13. I heard also the noise of the wings of the living creatures that
+touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against them,
+and a noise of great rushing._
+
+This combines some of the ideas of earlier verses without adding any
+new information. Notice that writer has the notion that the wings of
+one creature touched those of another, or that the creatures touched
+one another.
+
+This verse is typical of several more scattered throughout the first
+third of the book. All the verses mentioning the living creatures
+after the first chapter are more dramatic and all fail to continue the
+style of a careful reporter. No new ideas are advanced, but some
+rather unusual contradictions are introduced, by using several parts
+of several verses of Chapter One. Chapter Ten reads like an attempt at
+rephrasing Chapter One and Chapter Eleven is the last mention of the
+living creatures in the entire book.
+
+Although it contains no further information on the living creatures,
+Chapter Three has a verse that should be mentioned. Verse fifteen
+sounds like a fitting conclusion to the first chapter:
+
+[Illustration]
+
+
+_15. Then I came to them of the captivity at Tel-Abib, that dwelt by
+the river Chebar, and I sat where they sat, and remained there
+astonished among them for seven days._
+
+Just what do we have? We have a description of four spacesuited and
+helicopter-equipped men, getting off of, or out of something that
+landed in a cloud of dust or smoke. The four men start their
+helicopters, take off and fly to some height. On returning to the
+ground they remove their flying gear and wait. They are met by a fifth
+man, riding on a flying platform. Such an event would cause some
+interest in any community today, but in those times it could only be
+interpreted as supernatural--a miracle. The miracle may well be that
+the story has been preserved for us, twenty-six centuries later.
+
+A word for word interpretation is only part of the oddity of this
+chapter. Several other aspects are worth pondering. The whole chapter
+has a well-worn feeling, as though the author had told and re-told it
+many times. It reads like a deposition, taken down by a police
+officer, after the witness, who prides himself on truthfulness, has
+told the story over and over to his incredulous friends. It has a
+certain poetic beauty. It has the style of one who is telling you the
+truth, no matter whether you are going to believe it or not. It is
+the presentation of a tableau that makes no sense to the man who
+witnessed it, or to those to whom he is describing it.
+
+The product of a man's imagination is tied to his own experience, his
+own time. A wonderful tale of the supernatural may sound very
+imaginative to the contemporary of the teller, but it will date itself
+to a later generation. The lives of the Greek gods are related to the
+lives of the early Greeks. An imaginative science-fiction writer such
+as Jules Verne is limited in the same way. As good as he was,
+experience has set an outer limit to his imagination. Ezekiel's tale
+is not in this class. To his contemporaries, it was out of step with
+reality. To us it is real enough, but out of step with time. The most
+credible explanation is that it really happened.
+
+ * * * * *
+
+Perhaps there are some points of my interpretation that you do not
+agree with, but as a whole the story does hang together rather well.
+If you have the feeling that it would be easy to fit the words around
+an entirely different set of circumstances, I suggest that you try.
+
+It is interesting to know that some years ago a verbal battle raged in
+theological circles as to whether Ezekiel wrote the Book of Ezekiel.
+One school of thought held that he did, while the other school held
+that the first chapter was a "forgery," written in the third century
+before Christ, and tacked on as a sort of "leader" to Ezekiel's book.
+For our purposes it cannot be a forgery. It makes little difference
+how long ago it was written, so long as it was not since World War II!
+
+Suppose Ezekiel or some ancient man actually saw what I have proposed.
+What are the possible explanations? Is it possible that some ancient
+race, unknown to us, could have developed such equipment? It is not
+likely. During the last one hundred years we have been prodding about
+in the earth and finding so many ancient records that someone else
+besides Ezekiel would certainly have left us a report on them.
+
+The things that were science fiction twenty years ago are solid fact
+now. We know that a landing on the Moon is only a question of time, a
+few years at the most. The planets of our Solar System will follow, at
+least some before the turn of the century, probably. As for the
+planets of neighboring stars we cannot say. We have no way of
+exploring them at present, but that is not the same as saying that we
+never will. If the past performance of the human race is any measure,
+they will likely fall to exploration within two hundred years.
+
+If you concede that it is possible that we can visit other star
+systems in a future not too distant, why then could we not have been
+visited some time in the past? It may tend to deflate our ego to think
+that there may be intelligent beings not too different from us who are
+advanced beyond us. It need not. One of the most striking features of
+Ezekiel's story, if it has been decoded correctly, is that these
+beings are very much like we are, right at the present time. That puts
+them three or four thousand years ahead of us, a very small amount
+indeed when we consider the long sweep of human life and development
+before the dawn of written history.
+
+We are so used to stories of "Bug-eyed Monsters" coming to Earth, that
+the idea of beings from other worlds looking and acting human seems
+fantastic. It should not. There is good sound scientific reason to
+believe that there is little chance of it being any other way. Life is
+a delicate and fragile thing when compared to cosmic extremes of
+temperature and environment in our universe. If life formed on earth
+as science now believes that it did, we must have had just the right
+size planet at just the right distance from a particular type of star.
+While such extremely narrow limits are going to reduce the number of
+places in the universe where life can develop, it is also going to
+limit the _differences_. In our creation things operate by rule. The
+rule is that in similar circumstance there are similar solutions to a
+problem. Man is the solution of the problem of building the highest
+form of life on Earth. On a similar planet we can expect to find a
+similar solution. This is simply the extension of the theory of
+_parallel evolution_ to a cosmic scale.
+
+If then, we were visited by people from another world, what were they
+doing here? Strangely enough, there is considerable evidence of what
+they were up to from Ezekiel's own testimony. Let us suppose that
+these creatures were very much like we expect to be in five hundred
+years. They have come from some other star system in a ship whose
+principle of operation is as yet unknown to us. We can assume that it
+was a rather large ship, being that there were five beings on board at
+once, and we can presume that enough of a crew remained aboard to
+return it home in case something happened to the explorers. How would
+we proceed in such a case?
+
+It is not likely that such a large ship would be brought down to the
+surface of the earth. After arriving in the neighborhood of the earth,
+it would be put into orbit, and the surface of the earth would be
+studied through telescopes for days or weeks. The entire radio
+spectrum would be scanned to determine if there were inhabitants
+below, capable of operating electrical equipment. A small--manned or
+unmanned--flyer would be sent down into the upper atmosphere to
+determine the level of radioactivity, air components, spore and
+bacteria count and radio signals incapable of penetrating the
+atmosphere. From the ship the land areas would be mapped and studied.
+Any large object on the ground that appeared to be of an artificial
+nature would be given particular attention. During the night-time
+hours below, these objects and areas would be very carefully observed
+for signs of light.
+
+In the case of our visitors of twenty-six centuries ago, this is what
+they would have found: Quite a few artificial works could be seen.
+Cultivated fields and large buildings would be easily visible in many
+places around the eastern end of the Mediterranean. The Pyramids were
+old even then. (The Great Wall in China probably had not been
+started.) There would be no radio sounds, except for an occasional
+lightning click. We do not know how well their cities were lighted at
+night, but they were probably too dim to see. Tiny orange pinpoints of
+light from outdoor bonfires could probably be seen around the globe,
+but there would be more of them around the Mediterranean and in the
+East and Near East than anywhere else. The radioactivity level would
+be low. Our visitors would conclude that the inhabitants were either
+in the early stages of civilization, or were once highly civilized and
+now sunk back to a primitive stage. They would know that this was due
+to something other than atomic war.
+
+We have to conclude that these were moral beings. If the conditions
+below were as they seemed to be, that of an early civilization, they
+would not want to interfere. They would want to observe without being
+observed, so even if it were technically possible they would not want
+to bring a large ship down. They would send down as small and
+inconspicuous a vehicle as possible.
+
+We usually picture such a craft as a small version of the larger ship,
+or a large--by our standards--rocket, or an aircraft similar to our
+Dyna-soar. For people this advanced technologically something a lot
+simpler might be used. It might be an open vehicle, similar to our
+flying platforms, but with vastly more powerful nuclear power plants.
+The men going down would have to wear air-tight suits--spacesuits, and
+would have to leave them on all the time they were below, for fear of
+becoming infected with molds and viruses that the natives would long
+since have become immune to. One man, the pilot, would stay with the
+platform while the others did the observing and recording.
+
+The flying platform would have no need for rapid forward motion, at
+least inside the atmosphere and therefore would have little need for
+streamlining or protective covering for the passengers, who would
+carry their equipment with them. Most of the equipment for the survey
+would be built into the suits. They would each carry a set of portable
+helicopter attachments so they could cover more ground in a hurry.
+Like small helicopters of our time, these probably would have a rather
+limited speed and range, but they would be extremely maneuverable.
+
+The platform on the other hand, being nuclear powered, would probably
+be very powerful and have almost unlimited range, but it would be less
+maneuverable. The products of its exhaust might be radioactive and
+therefore its operators would be reluctant to operate it above or
+near the natives of the planet, or places that they frequented.
+
+As they push away from the mother-ship the spacemen would be in
+free-fall and would tend to "float" nearby until they turned the
+bottom side of the platform toward the direction of their orbit and
+applied power. They would then drop toward the surface, but with
+almost unlimited power available they could keep the downward
+component of their fall within limits and prevent overheating. They
+could probably be on the surface in less than an hour.
+
+The first and most likely area of exploration would be Egypt. The
+platform could be landed a few miles back from the Nile and be in
+completely unoccupied desert. The four helicopter-equipped explorers
+could put on their rotating-wing backpacks and by keeping low, come up
+very close to some center of civilization without being seen. By going
+up to a few thousand feet they could observe a fairly large area. Even
+if they were spotted, they would be small and unrecognizable, and
+cause a minimum amount of excitement.
+
+Like any tourist in any age they would probably be most interested in
+the territory around the pyramids. When they had finished here they
+might want to look over the country around what is now Bagdad, but
+_then_ only near the capital city of Nebuchadnezzar's empire. This is
+about eight hundred miles away, an impractical trip by helicopter, so
+they would return to the platform, climb to a few hundred thousand
+feet, and scoot over in a few minutes. Here they would land again in
+some uninhabited spot and repeat the maneuver. This country was
+probably sprinkled with more people than they expected. Maybe that's
+why this is the legendary flying carpet country, or maybe not. At any
+rate, one lonely military prisoner, working by himself near the banks
+of a stream must have seen them. Even if they did notice him, what
+possible harm could he do? In the present state of the civilization
+who would remember what he said or even believe him? I do.
+
+
+THE END
+
+ * * * * *
+
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Four-Faced Visitors of Ezekiel, by
+Arthur W. Orton
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE FOUR-FACED VISITORS OF EZEKIEL ***
+
+***** This file should be named 30252.txt or 30252.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/0/2/5/30252/
+
+Produced by Sankar Viswanathan, Greg Weeks, and the Online
+Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/old/30252.zip b/old/30252.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a7bff8c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/30252.zip
Binary files differ