diff options
Diffstat (limited to '35415.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | 35415.txt | 8013 |
1 files changed, 8013 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/35415.txt b/35415.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..99abc18 --- /dev/null +++ b/35415.txt @@ -0,0 +1,8013 @@ +The Project Gutenberg eBook, Jewish Immigration to the United States from +1881 to 1910, by Samuel Joseph + + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + + + + +Title: Jewish Immigration to the United States from 1881 to 1910 + Studies in History, Economics and Public Law, Vol. LIX, No. 4, 1914 + + +Author: Samuel Joseph + + + +Release Date: February 27, 2011 [eBook #35415] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-646-US (US-ASCII) + + +***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED +STATES FROM 1881 TO 1910*** + + +E-text prepared by Jeannie Howse, Fritz Ohrenschall, and the Online +Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) + + + + +-----------------------------------------------------------+ + | Transcriber's Note: | + | | + | This document was produced from an AMS Press reprint. | + | All modern material has been removed. The original, | + | printed in 1914, is an article in a journal, with it's | + | own page numbering (as well as the journal page numbering,| + | which has been removed from this transcription). | + | | + | Inconsistent hyphenation in the original document has | + | been preserved. | + | | + | Obvious typographical errors have been corrected. For | + | a complete list, please see the end of this document. | + | | + +-----------------------------------------------------------+ + + + + + +4 + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES + + +Studies in History, Economics and Public Law + +Edited by the Faculty of Political Science +of Columbia University + +Volume LIX] [Number 4 + +Whole Number 145 + + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES + +FROM 1881 TO 1910 + +by + +SAMUEL JOSEPH + + +1914 + + + + + To + MY FATHER AND MY MOTHER + + + + +PREFACE + + +In this survey of Jewish immigration to the United States for the past +thirty years, my purpose has been to present the main features of a +movement of population that is one of the most striking of modern +times. The causes of Jewish emigration from Eastern Europe, the course +of Jewish immigration to the United States and the most important +social qualities of the Jewish immigrants are studied, for the light +they throw upon the character of this movement. The method employed in +this investigation has been largely statistical and comparative, a +fact which is partly due to the kind of material that was available +and partly to the point of view that has been taken. Certain economic +and social factors, having a close bearing upon the past and present +situation of the Jews in Eastern Europe and frequently neglected in +the discussion of the various phases of this movement, have been +emphasized in the examination into the causes of the emigration of the +Jews from Eastern Europe and have been found vital in determining the +specific character of the Jewish immigration to this country. + +I desire gratefully to acknowledge my deep indebtedness to Mr. A.S. +Freidus, head of the Jewish department of the New York Public Library, +for his ever-ready assistance in the preparation of this work. Thanks +are due as well to Dr. C.C. Williamson, head of the Economics +department of the library, and to his able and courteous staff; to +Professor Robert E. Chaddock for his many valuable suggestions and +aid in the making of the statistical tables and in the reading of the +proof; and to Professor Edwin R.A. Seligman for his painstaking +reading of the manuscript. + + SAMUEL JOSEPH. + + + + +TABLE OF CONTENTS. + + + PART I.--THE CAUSES OF JEWISH EMIGRATION. + + PAGE + + CHAPTER I + + _Introduction._ + 1. Character of Jewish immigration 21 + 2. Eastern Europe 22 + 3. Distribution of Jews in Eastern Europe 22 + 4. Uniform character of East-European Jews 22 + + + CHAPTER II + + EASTERN EUROPE: ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONDITIONS. + + I. _Russia._ + 1. Medieval past 27 + 2. Agricultural character 28 + 3. Emancipation of serfs 29 + 4. Reminiscences of serfdom 29 + 5. Changes since the emancipation 30 + 6. Epoch of transition 31 + 7. Social orders: classes, the church 31 + 8. Political order: autocracy, bureaucracy 32 + 9. Political struggle: Russian liberalism 32 + 10. Reaction since Alexander III 33 + + II. _Roumania._ + + 1. Social-economic classes 34 + 2. Emancipation of the serfs: results 35 + 3. Development of industry and commerce 36 + 4. Growth of a middle class 36 + + III. _Austria-Hungary._ + + 1. Reminiscences of medieval economy 37 + 2. Transitional nature of economic life 37 + 3. Organization of industry and commerce 37 + 4. Politico-economic struggles 38 + 5. Galicia: economic and social conditions 39 + + IV. _Summary._ + + + CHAPTER III + + THE JEWS IN EASTERN EUROPE: ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL POSITION + + I. _Russia._ + 1. Economic characteristics 42 + a. Occupational distribution of the Jews 42 + b. Comparison with the non-Jews 42 + c. Participation of the Jews in principal + occupational groups 43 + d. Comparison of occupational distribution of Jews + and non-Jews in the Pale 43 + e. Economic activities of the Jews 44 + 2. Social characteristics 46 + a. Urban distribution of the Jews 46 + b. Comparison with the non-Jews 46 + c. Literacy: comparison with the non-Jews 47 + d. Liberal professions: comparison with the non-Jews 48 + + II. _Roumania._ + + 1. Economic characteristics 48 + a. The Jews as merchants and entrepreneurs 48 + b. The Jewish artisans 49 + c. Participation of the Jews in industry and commerce 49 + 2. Social characteristics 49 + a. Urban distribution of the Jews 49 + b. Comparison with the non-Jews 49 + c. Literacy: comparison with the non-Jews 50 + + III. _Austria-Hungary._ + 1. Economic characteristics 50 + a. Occupational distribution of the Jews 50 + b. Comparison with the non-Jews 51 + c. Participation of the Jews in principal + occupational groups 51 + Galicia 51 + a. Occupational distribution of the Jews 51 + b. Comparison with the non-Jews 51 + c. Participation of the Jews in principal + occupational groups 51 + d. Industrial and commercial position of the Jews + in East and West Galicia 52 + + 2. Social characteristics 52 + a. Urban distribution of the Jews 52 + b. Comparison with the non-Jews 52 + c. Liberal professions: comparison with the non-Jews 52 + + IV. _Summary._ + + + CHAPTER IV + + THIRTY YEARS OF JEWISH HISTORY + + I. _Russia._ + 1. Treatment of the Jews after the partitions of Poland 56 + 2. Pale of Jewish Settlement: special Jewish laws 57 + 3. Attitude of Russian government toward the Jews 57 + 4. Alexander II and liberalism 58 + 5. Reaction: antagonism to the Jews 59 + 6. Economic attack: the May Laws 60 + 7. Effect of the May Laws 61 + 8. Educational restrictions: the "percentage rule" 62 + 9. _Pogroms: pogroms of 1881-2_ 63 + 10. Expulsions from Moscow 64 + 11. Nicholas II: anti-Jewish agitation: Kishineff 64 + 12. War and revolution: effect upon the Jews 65 + 13. _Pogroms_ as counter-revolution 66 + 14. Results: economic and social pressure 67 + 15. Jewish policy of reactionary regime 68 + + II. _Roumania._ + 1. Early legal status of the Jews 69 + 2. Convention of Paris 69 + 3. Anti-Jewish activities of the government: Article VII 70 + 4. Berlin Congress 70 + 5. Article 44 of the Berlin Treaty 71 + 6. The revised Article VII 71 + 7. Legal status of the Jews fixed 72 + 8. Campaign of discrimination 73 + 9. Exclusion of Jews from economic activities 73 + 10. Educational restrictions: restrictions to + professional service 74 + 11. Political basis of anti-Jewish policy 75 + 12. Results: economic and social pressure 76 + 13. Jewish policy of Roumanian government: Hay's + circular note 76 + + III. _Austria-Hungary._ + 1. Early legal status of the Jews: emancipation 77 + 2. Jews attacked as liberals and capitalists 78 + 3. Rise of political antisemitism: its triumph: the + clericals 78 + Galicia 78 + 1. Rise of a Polish middle class: displacement of Jews + in industry and commerce 79 + 2. Economic boycott of Jewish artisans and traders 79 + 3. Anti-Jewish activity of local authorities 79 + 4. Over-competition and surplus of Jews in industry and + commerce 80 + 5. Historical role of the Jews: antagonism of peasantry + and clergy 80 + + + CHAPTER V + + CONCLUSION + + + PART II.--JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES + + A. ITS MOVEMENT + + + CHAPTER I + + DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS + + 1. Construction of table: difficulties 87 + 2. Sources utilized: reports of Jewish societies 87 + 3. Rearrangement of numbers from 1886 to 1898 88 + 4. Determination of numbers by country of nativity: + methods used 88 + 5. Determination of numbers from 1881 to 1885: methods + used 90 + 6. Tendency to magnify numbers of Jewish immigrants 91 + 7. Results 92 + + + CHAPTER II + + IMMIGRATION OF JEWS FROM EASTERN EUROPE + 1. Jewish immigration East-European 95 + 2. Summary by decades of Jewish immigration from Russia, + Roumania and Austria-Hungary 95 + 3. Annual contributions of Jewish immigration from + Russia, Roumania and Austria-Hungary 96 + + + CHAPTER III + + IMMIGRATION OF JEWS FROM RUSSIA + 1. Russian Jewish immigration a movement of steady + growth 98 + a. Summary by decades 98 + b. Annual variations: effect of the Moscow expulsions 98 + 2. Participation of Jews in the immigration from Russia 101 + a. Annual variations 101 + b. Summary by decades 102 + c. Relative predominance of Jewish in total 102 + 3. Intensity of Jewish immigration from Russia 103 + a. Rate of immigration 103 + b. Fluctuations of rate 104 + + + CHAPTER IV + + IMMIGRATION OF JEWS FROM ROUMANIA + 1. Roumanian Jewish immigration a rising movement 105 + a. Summary by decades 105 + b. Annual variations 105 + 2. Participation of Jews in the immigration from + Roumania 107 + a. Jewish and total synonymous 107 + b. Annual variations 107 + 3. Intensity of Jewish immigration from Roumania 108 + a. Rate of immigration 108 + b. Fluctuations of rate 108 + + + CHAPTER V + + IMMIGRATION OF JEWS FROM AUSTRIA-HUNGARY + 1. Jewish immigration from Austria-Hungary a rising + movement 109 + a. Summary by decades 109 + b. Annual variations 109 + c. Comparison of Jewish with total + 2. Participation of Jews in the immigration from + Austria-Hungary 110 + a. Summary by decades 110 + b. Annual variations 111 + 3. Comparison of immigration of Jews from Austria and + Hungary 111 + a. Numbers 111 + b. Participation in total 111 + 4. Immigration of Jews and other peoples from + Austria-Hungary 112 + 5. Rate of Jewish immigration from Austria-Hungary 112 + + + CHAPTER VI + + JEWISH IMMIGRATION + 1. Total movement one of geometrical progression 113 + a. Summary by decades 113 + b. Summary by six-year periods 113 + c. Annual variations 114 + + + CHAPTER VII + + PARTICIPATION OF JEWS IN TOTAL IMMIGRATION + 1. Rise in proportion of Jewish to total 117 + 2. Summary by decades 117 + 3. Annual variations 117 + 4. Comparison of annual variations of Jewish and total + immigration 118 + 5. Rank of Jewish in total immigration 119 + 6. Rate of immigration 120 + + + CHAPTER VIII + + SUMMARY + + + B. ITS CHARACTERISTICS + + CHAPTER I + + FAMILY MOVEMENT + + 1. Importance of sex and age distribution 127 + 2. Proportion of females in Jewish immigration 127 + a. Tendency towards increase 127 + 3. Proportion of children in Jewish immigration 128 + 4. Proportion of sexes in total and Jewish immigration 129 + 5. Proportion of children in total and Jewish + immigration 129 + 6. Comparison of composition by sex of Jews and other + immigrant peoples 130 + 7. Comparison of composition by age of Jews and other + immigrant peoples 130 + 8. Comparison of composition by sex and age of Jews and + the Slavic races 131 + 9. Comparison of composition by sex and age of Jews + from Roumania and Roumanians 131 + 10. Comparison of composition by sex and age of Jewish + and "old" and "new" immigration 132 + 11. Conclusion 132 + + + CHAPTER II. + + PERMANENT SETTLEMENT + + 1. Emigration of Jews compared with immigration of Jews 133 + 2. Comparison of return movement of total and Jewish + immigration 134 + 3. Comparison of return movement of Jews and other + immigrant peoples 134 + 4. Emigration tendency of Jews from Russia, Roumania + and Austria-Hungary 135 + 5. Comparison of return movement of Jews and Poles + from Russia and Austria-Hungary 136 + 6. Comparison of return movement of Jewish and "old" + and "new" immigration 137 + 7. Comparison of return movement of Jews and other + immigrant peoples, 1908 137 + 8. Response of Jewish immigration to economic + conditions in the United States 138 + 9. Comparison of Jews and other immigrant peoples who + have been previously in the United States 138 + 10. Conclusion 139 + + + CHAPTER III + + OCCUPATIONS + + 1. Occupational distribution of Jewish immigrants 140 + 2. Jewish immigrants reporting occupations 141 + a. Number and percentage of occupational groups 141 + 3. Skilled laborers 141 + a. Garment workers 141 + b. Other important groups 142 + 4. Participation of Jews in occupational distribution + of total immigration 142 + 5. Comparison of occupational distribution of Jews and + other immigrant peoples 143 + 6. Comparison of occupational distribution of Jews and + Slavic peoples 144 + 7. Comparison of occupational distribution of Jewish + and "old" and "new" immigration 144 + 8. Conclusion 145 + + + CHAPTER IV + + ILLITERACY + + 1. Illiteracy of Jewish immigrants 146 + 2. Influence of sex upon illiteracy of Jewish + immigrants 146 + 3. Illiteracy of Jewish male and female immigrants 147 + 4. Comparison of rate of illiteracy of Jews and other + immigrant peoples 147 + 5. Comparison of rate of illiteracy of Jewish and + "old" and "new" immigration 147 + 6. Comparison of rate of illiteracy of Jews and + East-European peoples 148 + 7. Comparison of rate of illiteracy of each sex among + Jews and East-European peoples 148 + 8. Conclusion 148 + + + CHAPTER V + + DESTINATION + + 1. Factors influencing destination 149 + 2. Proportion of Jewish immigrants destined for + divisions 149 + 3. Proportion of Jewish immigrants destined for + principal states 149 + 4. Comparison of destination of Jews and other + immigrant peoples 150 + 5. Participation of Jews in the immigration destined + for divisions 150 + 6. Final disposition of Jewish immigrants 151 + + + CHAPTER VI + + SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS + + + + +STATISTICAL TABLES + + + PAGE + + IA. Participation of Jews in occupations in the + Russian Empire, 1897 158 + + IB. Participation of Jews in occupations in the Pale + of Jewish Settlement, 1897 159 + + II. Jewish immigration at the ports of New York, + Philadelphia and Baltimore, July to June, 1886 to + 1898 159 + + III. Jewish immigration at the port of New York, July, + 1885 to June, 1886, by month and country of + nativity 159 + + IVA. Jewish immigration at the port of Philadelphia, + 1886 to 1898, by country of nativity 160 + + IVB. Jewish immigration at the port of Baltimore, 1891 + to 1898, by country of nativity 160 + + V. Jewish immigration at the ports of New York, + Philadelphia and Baltimore, 1886 to 1898, by + country of nativity 161 + + VI. Jewish immigration to the United States, 1881 to + 1910 93 + + VII. Percentage of annual Jewish immigration to the + United States, contributed by each country of + nativity, 1881 to 1910 94 + + VIII. Jewish immigration to the United States, 1881 to + 1910, absolute numbers and percentages, by decade + and country of nativity 162 + + IX. Jewish immigration from Russia, 1881 to 1910, and + percentage of total arriving each year 162 + + X. Jewish immigration from Russia, 1881 to 1910, by + decade and percentage of total arriving each decade 163 + + XI. Jewish immigration from Russia at the port of New + York, January 1, 1891 to December 31, 1891, and + January 1, 1892 to December 31, 1892, by month 163 + + XII. Total immigration from Russia and Jewish immigration + from Russia, 1881 to 1910, and percentage Jewish of + total 164 + + XIII. Total immigration from Russia and Jewish immigration + from Russia, 1881 to 1910, by decade and percentage + Jewish of total 164 + + XIV. Immigration to the United States from the Russian + Empire, 1899 to 1910, by annual percentage of + contribution of principal peoples 165 + + XV. Rate of immigration of peoples predominant in the + immigration from Russia, 1899 to 1910 165 + + XVI. Rate of Jewish immigration from Russia per 10,000 + of Jewish population, 1899 to 1910 166 + + XVII. Jewish immigration from Roumania, 1881 to 1910, by + decade and percentage of total arriving each decade 166 + + XVIII. Jewish immigration from Roumania, 1881 to 1910, and + percentage of total arriving each year 167 + + XIX. Total immigration from Roumania and Jewish + immigration from Roumania, 1899 to 1910, and + percentage Jewish of total 168 + + XX. Rate of Jewish immigration from Roumania per 10,000 + of Jewish population, 1899 to 1910 168 + + XXI. Jewish immigration from Austria Hungary, 1881 to + 1910, by decade and percentage of total arriving + each decade 169 + + XXII. Jewish immigration from Austria-Hungary, 1881 to + 1910, and percentage of total arriving each year 169 + + XXIII. Total and Jewish immigration from Austria-Hungary, + 1881 to 1910, by decade and percentage Jewish of + total 170 + + XXIV. Total and Jewish immigration from Austria-Hungary, + 1881 to 1910, and percentage Jewish of total 170 + + XXV. Percentage of annual immigration from + Austria-Hungary contributed by principal peoples, + 1899 to 1910 171 + + XXVI. Rate of Jewish immigration from Austria-Hungary per + 10,000 of Jewish population, 1899 to 1910 171 + + XXVII. Jewish immigration, 1881 to 1910, by decade 172 + + XXVIII. Jewish immigration, 1881 to 1910, by six-year + period 172 + + XXIX. Jewish immigration to the United States, 1881 to + 1910 173 + + XXX. Total immigration and Jewish immigration, 1881 to + 1910, by decade and percentage Jewish of total 174 + + XXXI. Total immigration and Jewish immigration, 1881 to + 1910, by year and percentage Jewish of total 174 + + XXXII. Total and Jewish immigration, 1881 to 1910, by + number and percentage of increase or decrease 175 + + XXXIII. Sex of Jewish immigrants, 1899 to 1910 176 + + XXXIV. Sex of Jewish immigrant adults at the port of New + York, 1886 to 1898 176 + + XXXV. Age of Jewish immigrants, 1809 to 1910 177 + + XXXVI. Age of Jewish immigrants at the port of New York, + 1886 to 1898 177 + + XXXVII. Sex of total and Jewish immigrants, 1899 to 1910 178 + + XXXVIII. Sex of European immigrants, 1899 to 1910 179 + + XXXIX. Age of European immigrants, 1899 to 1909 180 + + XL. Sex, 1899 to 1910, and age, 1899 to 1909, of Slavic + immigrants 181 + + XLIA. Sex of Roumanian immigrants, 1899 to 1910, and of + immigrants from Roumania. 1900 to 1910 181 + + XLIB. Age of Jewish and Roumanian immigrants, 1899 to + 1909 181 + + XLII. Sex and age of "old" and "new" immigration (Jewish + excepted) and of Jewish immigration, 1899 to 1909 182 + + XLIII. Jewish immigration and emigration, 1908 to 1912 182 + + XLIV. Total and Jewish emigrant aliens and percentage + Jewish immigrant aliens of total immigrant aliens, + 1908 to 1912 183 + + XLV. European immigrant aliens admitted, and European + emigrant aliens departed, 1908, 1909 and 1910 183 + + XLVI. Jewish immigration and emigration, Russia, + Austria-Hungary and Roumania, 1908 to 1912 184 + + XLVII. Polish immigration and emigration, Russia and + Austria-Hungary, 1908 to 1912 184 + + XLVIII. "Old" and "new" (Jewish excepted) and Jewish + immigration and emigration, 1908 to 1910 185 + + XLIX. European immigrant aliens, 1907, and European + emigrant aliens, 1908 185 + + L. Total European immigrants admitted and total of those + admitted during this period in the United States + previously, 1899 to 1910 186 + + LI. Occupational distribution of Jewish immigrants, + 1899 to 1910 186 + + LII. Jewish immigrants reporting occupations, 1899 + to 1910 187 + + LIII. Jewish immigrants engaged in professional + occupations, 1899 to 1910 187 + + LIV. Jewish immigrants reporting skilled occupations, + 1899 to 1910 188 + + LV. Occupations of total European and Jewish immigrants, + 1899 to 1909, and percentage Jewish of total 189 + + LVI. Total European immigrants and immigrants without + occupation, 1899 to 1910 189 + + LVII. Occupations of European immigrants reporting + employment, 1899 to 1910 190 + + LVIII. Occupations of Slavic and Jewish immigrants + reporting employment, 1890 to 1910 191 + + LIX. Occupations of "old" and "new" immigration (Jewish + excepted) and of Jewish immigration, 1899 to 1909 191 + + LX. Illiteracy of Jewish immigrants, 1899 to 1910 192 + + LXI. Sex of Jewish immigrant illiterates, 1908 to 1912 192 + + LXII. Illiteracy of European immigrants, 1899 to 1910 193 + + LXIII. Illiteracy of "old" and "new" immigration (Jewish + excepted) and of Jewish immigration, 1899 to 1909 194 + + LXIV. Illiteracy of peoples from Eastern Europe, 1899 to + 1910 194 + + LXV. Sex of illiterates of peoples from Eastern Europe, + 1908 194 + + LXVI. Destination of Jewish immigrants, 1899 to 1910, by + principal divisions 195 + + LXVII. Destination of Jewish immigrants, 1899 to 1910, by + principal states 195 + + LXVIII. Percentage of Jewish and total immigrants destined + for each division, 1899 to 1910 196 + + LXIX. Participation of Jewish immigrants in destination of + total immigrants, 1899 to 1910, by principal + divisions 196 + + + APPENDICES + + A. President Harrison's Message, 1891 199 + B. Article VII of the Constitution of Roumania 200 + C. Secretary Hay's Note 201 + BIBLIOGRAPHY 207 + + + + +CHAPTER I + +INTRODUCTION + + +Thirty years have elapsed since the Jews began to enter the United +States in numbers sufficiently large to make their immigration +conspicuous in the general movement to this country. A study of Jewish +immigration, in itself and in relation to the general movement, +reveals an interesting phase of this historic and many-sided social +phenomenon and throws light upon a number of important problems +incident to it. + +Especially does it become clear that the Jewish immigration, although +in part the result of the same forces as have affected the general +immigration and the separate groups composing it, differs, +nevertheless, in certain marked respects, from the typical +immigration. Some of these differences indeed are fundamental and +far-reaching in their effects and practically stamp the Jewish +immigration as a movement _sui generis_. + +Generally speaking, in the forces which are behind the emigration of +the Jews from the countries of the Old World, in the character of +their immigration--its movement and its distinguishing qualities--the +Jewish immigration strikes a distinctly individual note. + +Three European countries--Russia, Austria-Hungary and +Roumania--furnish the vast majority of the Jewish immigrants to the +United States.[1] It is to these countries, therefore, that we must +turn for light upon the causes of this movement. + +Geographically, these countries are closely connected; they form +practically the whole of the division of Eastern Europe. Here the +Slavonic races so largely predominate that the term Slavonic Europe +has been applied to this section of Europe. + +Eastern or Slavonic Europe is a social as well as a geographical fact. +In racial stratification, economic and social institutions, cultural +position and, in part, religious traditions as well, these countries +present strong similarities to one another and equally strong +differences in most of these respects from the countries of Western +Europe. + +It is here that the Jews are found concentrated in the greatest +numbers. Nearly seven and a half-million Jews--more than half of the +Jews of the world--live in these countries. Of this number more than +five millions are in Russia, more than two millions in Austria-Hungary, +and a quarter of a million in Roumania. The great majority of these are +massed on the contiguous borders, in a zone which embraces Poland, and +Western Russia, Galicia, and Moldavia. This is the emigration zone. The +relative density of the Jews is greatest in these parts. Every seventh +man in Poland, every ninth man in Western Russia and in Galicia, and +every tenth man in Moldavia, is a Jew. Thus the center of gravity of +the Jewish populations is still the former kingdom of Poland, as it was +constituted before the partitions at the end of the eighteenth century. + +United originally in Poland, the Jews of Eastern Europe still retain +the same general characteristics, in spite of the changes that have +been brought about by a century of rule under different governments. +Speaking a common language, Yiddish, and possessing common religious +traditions, as well as similar social and psychological traits, the +East-European Jews present on the whole a striking uniformity of +character. + +Through the centuries they have become deeply rooted in the +East-European soil, their economic and social life intimately +connected with the economic and social conditions of these countries +and their history deeply influenced by the transformations that have +been taking place in them for half a century. + +As these conditions and transformations furnish the foundation of +Jewish life in Eastern Europe, and contain the explanation of the +situation that has been largely responsible for the recent Jewish +emigration to Western Europe and the United States, a rapid review of +the economic, social and political conditions of Russia, Roumania and +Austria-Hungary will be made. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[1] _Cf. infra_, p. 95. + + + + +PART I + +THE CAUSES OF JEWISH EMIGRATION + + + + +CHAPTER II + +EASTERN EUROPE: ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONDITIONS + + +I. RUSSIA + +The difficulty of the average American to understand the character of +Russian life, some traits of which have been so vividly brought home +to him in recent years, may be attributed to a general idea that a +country rubbing elbows as it were with Western civilization for +several centuries must perforce itself possess the characteristics of +modern civilization. A closer survey of the economic, social and +political conditions prevailing in Russia to-day, however, reveals +many points of difference from those of the countries of Western +Europe, and presents a remarkable contrast with those prevailing in +the United States. Russia and the United States, indeed, stand, in +Leroy-Beaulieu's phrase, at the two poles of modern civilization. So +far apart are they in the character of their economic, social and +political structures, in the degree in which they utilize the forms +and institutions of modern life, and, in the difference in the mental +make-up of their peoples, that there exist few, if any, points of real +contact. + +Up to the middle of the 19th century, Russia was, in nearly all +respects, a medieval state. She was a society, which, in the words of +Kovalevsky, "preserved still of feudalism, not its political spirit +but its economic structure, serfdom, monopoly and the privileges of +the nobility, its immunities in the matter of taxes, its exclusive +right to landed property, and its seignorial rights."[2] Her modern +era dates from the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, when she became, +at least in form, a European state. But, though the Russia of our day +has witnessed great transformations in the direction of modernization, +she still retains many of the conditions and much of the spirit of her +medieval past. + +A rapid review of the economic, social and political conditions of +Russia will serve to make clearer this situation, which has an +important bearing upon the exceptional position, legal, economic, +social, of the Jews in the Empire, and upon the fateful events of +their history for a third of a century. + +The most striking fact in the economic life of present-day Russia is +that it is overwhelmingly agricultural. More than three-fourths of her +population are engaged in some form of agricultural labor. The vast +majority are peasants living in villages. Towns are relatively few and +sparsely populated. Agricultural products constitute 85 per cent of +the annual exports. What a contrast does this agricultural state, this +"peasant empire", present to the industrially and commercially +developed countries of Western Europe and the United States! + +The Russian peasant still practices a primitive system of agriculture. +His method of extensive cultivation, the three-field system in vogue, +his primitive implements, his domestic economy of half a century ago, +with its home production for home consumption, which is still +maintained in many parts of Russia to this day--all these present +conditions not far removed from those of the middle ages of Western +Europe.[3] + +The existence to our day of this almost primitive economy finds its +explanation in the fact that serfdom existed in Russia, in all its +unmitigated cruelty, until comparatively recent times. Its abolition +through the Emancipation Act of Alexander II--antedating our own +Emancipation Proclamation by a few years--struck off the chains that +bound twenty millions of peasants to the soil. The emancipation, +however, was not complete. The land the peasants received was +insufficient for their needs. Other conditions co-operated in the +course of time with this primary one, to create a situation of chronic +starvation for the great mass of the Russian peasants. Forced by the +government to pay heavy taxes, in addition to redemption dues for the +land, which they paid until recently, and receiving little help from +either government or the nobility for the improvement of their +position, they are virtually exploited almost as completely as before +the emancipation. + +Thus, though freed in person, the peasants are to a great extent bound +by economic ties to their former masters, the nobles. These two +social-economic classes maintain towards each other practically the +same relative position held by them before the emancipation. The manor +still controls the hut. + +The former servile relations have persisted psychologically as well. +The Russian peasant is still largely a serf in his mentality, in his +feeling of dependence, in his inertia and lack of individual +enterprise, and, above all, in the smallness of his demands upon +life.[4] This fact permeates, as it serves to explain, many aspects of +contemporary Russian life. + +The industrial and commercial stage of Russian economy began with the +emancipation, which set free a great supply of labor. The changes +that have taken place have nevertheless not obliterated many of the +landmarks of the feudal, pre-reformation period. The economic +activities of the last half-century present a curious juxtaposition of +old and new, medieval and modern. Cottage and village industries but +little removed from the natural economy of the earlier period exist by +the side of great factories and industrial establishments employing +thousands of workmen. Fairs and markets still play a large part in +supplying the needs of the peasants, rapidly as they are being +supplanted by the commercial activities of the towns. The industrial +laborers, recruited mainly from the country, retain largely their +peasant interests, relations and characteristics. The payment of wages +in kind, which is still in vogue in many parts, and the right of +inflicting corporal punishment retained by the employers, give +evidence of the strong impress of the servile conditions of the past. + +Vast changes have nevertheless taken place since the emancipation. +Capitalism has made rapid, if uneven, progress. Under the fostering +care of the government, industry and commerce have made immense +strides. The factory system has taken firm root and has been +developing a specialized class of industrial laborers. Great +industrial centers have sprung up; towns have grown rapidly. The +middle class, hitherto insignificant, has increased in number, wealth +and influence. Among the peasants as well, freedom has given birth to +the spirit of individualism. The differentiation of the peasantry into +wealthier peasants and landless agricultural laborers, the great mass +of the peasantry occupying the middle ground, and the gradual +dissolution of the two great forces of Russian agricultural life--the +patriarchal family and the village community--have been the most +important results. + +Russia is clearly in a state of transition from the agricultural or +medieval to the industrial and commercial or modern economic life. +This transformation of the economic structure is being effected under +great difficulties and the strong opposition of the ruling classes, +whose privileges are threatened by the new order of things. + +The Russian social and political order reflects the medieval +background which formed the setting for her entrance upon the modern +stage. The class distinctions, naturally obtaining, are hardened into +rigidity by the law, which divides Russian society into a hierarchy of +five classes or orders--the nobles, the clergy, the merchants, the +townsmen and the peasants--each with separate legal status, rights and +obligations. + +The individual is thus not an independent unit, as in the legal codes +of Western Europe or the United States. Accompanying the legal +stratification there is an exceedingly strong, almost caste-like, +sense of difference between the members of the different groups. + +This emphasis on the person is characteristic of the medieval social +order. In Russia it finds additional expression in the control of +individual movement by means of the passport, without which document a +Russian may be said to have no legal existence. + +Even more striking is the position of the Russian Church, as well as +the religio-national conception which dominates the Russian mind and +according to which orthodoxy and nationality are regarded as one. The +Russian Orthodox is the only true Russian; all others are foreigners. +In the alliance of church and state--which in Russia reaches a degree +of strength not attained in any other European state--in the complete +control exercised by the Church over the lives of the faithful and the +clergy, in secular as in religious matters, in its intolerant attitude +towards other creeds and its unceasing attempts to suppress them--it +presents characteristics strongly reminiscent of the position of the +medieval church in Western Europe. + +The one great political fact of Russia has been the autocracy. The +degree of control which the autocratic Czars exercised unopposed over +their subjects marks an important difference between the political +development of Russia and that of the countries of Western Europe. At +an early period the Czars had transformed the nobility into a body of +state officials, thus at a blow depriving them of any real powers, +apart from the will of the Crown, and making them serve the interests +of the state. In this way the nobles, or the landed aristocracy, +became the main source from which the members of the bureaucracy were +recruited. The lack of a middle class of any real size and influence, +which could play a part in the demand for political rights, explains +in a measure the strength of the autocratic powers.[5] The autocracy +in turn has been largely dependent upon its servant, the bureaucracy. +To such an extent has the Russian government been the expression of +the will and interests of this all-powerful body as to justify +Leroy-Beaulieu's designation of Russia as the "Bureaucratic State". + +Thus the autocracy, the nobility-bureaucracy and the church have been +the dominating forces in the economic, social and political life of +Russia. + +In the light of this analysis, the political struggles that have been +so conspicuous a feature of Russian life during the last half of the +19th century become an accompaniment as well as an expression of the +progressive development of Russia towards modern economic, social and +political institutions. + +Russian liberalism,--largely revolutionary because of the denial of +even elementary rights, such as the freedom of person, of speech, of +the press and of meeting,--rights which were secured to Englishmen +through the Magna Charta--has had the serious task not only of +securing these rights but at the same time of creating in Russia the +conditions of modern civilization. For the twenty years in which its +spirit ruled, during the reign of Alexander II, the reforms begun +under its influence amounted to a veritable revolution. The economic, +social, political and juridical reforms of this epoch generated new +forces and began the modernization of Russia. These reforms +encountered the formidable opposition of the nobility and the church +and finally of the autocracy, when the latter felt that its position +was gradually being undermined, especially by the demand for a +constitution. With the assassination of Alexander II, the liberal era +was brought to a close, and a reaction was ushered in which has lasted +to our day. + +The classes that came into power with Alexander III and Pobedonostseff +were, from their economic interests, social outlook and political +ideals, essentially medieval and may properly be termed the feudal +party. Guided by its economic interests--which had been seriously +threatened by the emancipation--and swayed by the Slavophilistic +philosophy,[6] this party sought to nullify as far as possible +the reforms of the epoch of emancipation and to carry through a +many-sided program for putting the order of things backward to the +medieval, pre-reform days. Autocracy, Greek Orthodoxy and Russian +Nationalism--the famous Slavophilistic trinity--were glorified, +the first two as peculiarly national institutions, the policy of +russification and the repression of non-orthodox faiths by force +were proclaimed as vital to the social health of Russia, the blind +ignorance and illiteracy of the peasants were extolled as a virtue and +the control over them by the nobility was strengthened in many ways. +Freedom of every form was condemned as an aping of the "rotten" +civilization of the West with its decaying institutions, and as false +to the true Russian national, historical development. + +During this period of reaction, however, the liberal movement was kept +alive, largely as revolutionary propaganda. The earlier movement had +been directed by the educated classes, the "_Intelligenzia_" of +Russia. Lately, with the growth of the middle class and a population +of industrial workers in the towns and the factories, and a wealthier +class of peasants, the cry for reform has become more insistent, and +only recently partly successful in results. + +Summarizing his impressions of Russian life and institutions obtained +while serving as Ambassador to Russia, Andrew D. White remarked: +"During two centuries Russia has been coming slowly out of the middle +ages--indeed, out of perhaps the most cruel phases of medieval +life."[7] One of the phases of this process has been the bitter +struggle between the feudal and the modern forces that has occupied +Russia for the last third of a century. + + +II. ROUMANIA + +In Roumania,[8] in spite of a liberal constitution modeled upon the +Belgian, granting all rights enjoyed by citizens of a free state, the +underlying economic, social and, in a measure, political conditions +point to a state of things little removed from the medieval forms of +life. The main social-economic classes are the large landed +proprietors, composed chiefly of the old nobility or boyars, and the +peasants, who were formerly serfs. In the hands of the former are +concentrated the greater part of the land. Five thousand large landed +proprietors together owned nearly half of the cultivable land. Nearly +a million of peasants, on the other hand, comprising with their +dependents a great majority of the population, together owned a little +over two-fifths of the cultivable land.[9] + +This situation is an inheritance from the servile system which existed +in Roumania until 1864, when it was legally abolished. The freedom +granted to the peasants was, however, more formal than real. The land +given them being insufficient for their needs, and pasture land +especially having been denied them, they were as a rule compelled to +lease land or pasture right from their former masters at ruinous +rates, often paying by labor on their former masters' estates. Thus +the essential feudal services were in the main continued, especially +as the lease and labor contracts, generally drawn up in the interests +of the landed proprietor, were often usurious and extremely +oppressive.[10] In twenty years there was little change from the +previous condition of serfdom, so that a law was necessary, in 1882, +to permit the peasants to work at least two days during the week on +their own land. + +Since this period there has been practically little change in this +essentially feudal relation of the peasantry to the landed +proprietors. As the owners of the great estates are a ruling power in +the political life of the country, the greater part of peasants being +disqualified from voting through property and educational +requirements, the former have been enabled to keep the peasantry in +this condition of semi-servitude. The result is a state of ignorance, +misery and degradation on the part of the peasantry that is difficult +to parallel in another European country. That the peasants are not +entirely passive under their wrongs is shown in the repeated uprisings +against their masters and in the two great social revolutions of 1888 +and 1907, both of which were put down by military force. + +Roumania's advent into industry and commerce may be dated from the +eighties of the last century, and was initiated by the industrial law +of 1887, which sought to create a national industry by means of +subsidies, land grants and other favors to undertakers of large +industrial enterprises. Since then the growth has been sufficiently +rapid to place Roumania as the industrial and commercial leader of the +Balkan States. Relatively, however, it is still very backward. Only 14 +per cent of the population is urban. The industrial laborers are +estimated at no more than 40,000. There are only a few cities. Only +the largest--Bucarest--has above 100,000 inhabitants, three other +cities have between fifty and seventy-five thousand inhabitants. The +chief industrial establishments, such as saw mills, flour mills and +distilleries, are concerned mainly in the working up of the raw +materials produced in the country. Nevertheless, industrial progress +has made for the growth of a small but influential middle class, which +divides the control of affairs with the large landed proprietors. Its +influence can be traced in the electoral law, which gives the urban +classes, constituting the backbone of the liberal party, a majority in +the Chamber of Deputies. + + +III. AUSTRIA-HUNGARY + +Though relatively far advanced along the road of modern civilization, +Austria-Hungary, through its prevailing mode of economic and social +life, and through its large Slavic populations, belongs rather to +Eastern than to Western Europe. Historically, it began its modern +career about the same time as Russia, when it abolished, in 1867, the +feudal services and dues, survivals of the previous servile +institutions. Nevertheless, in its large agricultural population, in +the primitive system of cultivation generally in vogue, in the +scattered character of the peasant holdings, in the strong contrast +between the great landed estates or _Latifundia_, held chiefly by the +nobility, and the small, even minute, estates of the majority of the +peasant proprietors, and in the natural economy prevailing in many +parts of the Dual Monarchy and constituting the main foundation upon +which the life of the peasants rests--in all these characteristics, is +reflected the almost medieval economy which existed in the empire +before 1848 and which is not yet entirely outgrown. + +Industrially and commercially, Austria, far more than Hungary, has +indeed made really remarkable progress. Yet in this respect the +greatest contrast exists between the various Austrian provinces. +Certain of these--Galicia and Bukowina, for instance--are not only the +most backward in these pursuits, but their agricultural population is +even relatively increasing. Even in the industrially advanced +provinces, such as Lower Austria and Bohemia, the transitional nature +of the industrial life is evident in the unspecialized character of a +larger portion of the town laborers, many of whom are peasants +temporarily employed in factories and mines. + +The Austrian organization of industry and commerce is a modernized +version of the guilds and crafts of medieval Western Europe. How these +medieval economic forms with their underlying psychologic forces still +live and dominate Austria, especially its Slavic nationalities, is +shown by the revival in 1859 of the Austrian guilds, the direct +descendants of the medieval _Innungen_. These were, in 1883, developed +in the form of _Zwangsgenossenschaften_ or compulsory trade-guilds, +which, in their regulations concerning the _Befaehigungsnachweis_ or +certificate of capacity, the three orders of master, journeyman and +apprentice, the principle of compulsory entrance into the local guild, +the workman's passport or _Arbeitsbuch_, unite the methods of +regulating and restricting industry and trade characteristic of the +Middle Ages, with modern methods of combination, arbitration, and +assistance of members. By the side of these compulsory guilds are to +be found the _Gewerkschaften_, or the modern voluntary trade-unions. + +The transition to modern economic and social conditions is, +nevertheless, well advanced. This is seen in a decrease of the +agricultural classes and an increase of the industrial and commercial +classes in the thirty years from 1869 to 1900. Another sign is the +fairly strong differentiation of the economic-social classes, in both +the agricultural and the industrial groups, which has advanced quite +rapidly. The middle class, while neither as large nor as influential +as in the countries of Western Europe, has played an important role +towards hastening this transition. + +Politically, the Dual Monarchy occupies a middle ground between +absolutist Russia and constitutional England. The court, the nobility +and the Roman Church with its strong aristocratic leanings, represent +the dominant power in Austria. The economic and social changes of the +transitional period have been accompanied by politico-economic +struggles which have played a vital part and have cut through and +across the racial, national and religious conflicts of this +much-distracted conglomeration of peoples. Amid the confusion of +parties, with their complexity of programs, may be distinguished the +German-Austrian liberals, representatives of the middle class or +industrialists, whose historic mission was to create a modern state +in Austria, and who carried out, in large measure, their program of +constitutionalism, economic freedom and the secular state. Against +them were arrayed the powerful forces of the agrarian party or the +landed aristocracy--the upholders of the feudal economic-social order +of privilege and class distinction, the clericals--the upholders of +the idea of the Christian State--and the representatives of the lower +middle class, composed chiefly of petty artisans and traders, whose +ideal was the medieval industrial organization, largely co-operative +and regulated, as opposed to the individualistic and competitive +system of the modern era, with its great concentration of wealth, +capital and power in the hands of the middle class. That the present +structure of Austria is so much of a compromise and crosspatch between +modern and medieval economic, social and political forms, and contains +so much that is essentially incongruous, is due largely to the +successful struggle which the chief parties of the medieval order--the +feudal-clericals--the party of the upper classes, and the Christian +Socialists--the party of the lower classes--have waged against the +growing constitutionalization, industrialization and secularization of +Austria--in short, against the transformation of Austria into a modern +state. + +It is in Galicia that the conditions obtaining in Russia are largely +duplicated. Geographically, racially and socially, Galicia is a part +of Russia. Galicia is a preponderatingly agricultural land and +possesses the densest agricultural population in Europe. Modern +industry is relatively little developed, its place being held to a +great extent by the domestic system of industry. The contrast between +the large and small estates is sharper here than perhaps in any other +section of Europe. The Polish nobility, in whose hands the large +estates are mostly found, are the ruling social and political, as well +as economic, power in Galicia. The autonomous Galician _Diet_ is +practically the instrument of their interests. A middle class has been +gradually rising and contesting their supremacy. The peasantry is one +of the most illiterate, degraded, and oppressed in all Europe. + + +IV. SUMMARY + +This brief review of the economic and social conditions in Russia, +Roumania and Austria-Hungary has shown that, broadly speaking, these +countries present points of similarity in their situation and their +recent movement. In all of these countries, economic and social +conditions closely resembling those that obtained in the countries of +Western Europe several centuries ago were found until comparatively +recent times. The abolition of serfdom in Russia and in Roumania, and +of feudal dues in Austria-Hungary, paved the way for the entrance of +these states into modern European civilization. The succeeding period +has been marked by a rapid transition from the old domestic economy to +a modern exchange economy, through the growth of industry and +commerce. The medieval conditions of the earlier period have +nevertheless not been entirely obliterated. They exist, in Russia, in +the privileges and powers of the nobility, in the inferior status and +oppressed condition of the peasantry, in the strong class +distinctions, in the restraints upon economic activity and upon +movement. Though in smaller measure, the same conditions are found in +Austria-Hungary, especially in Galicia. In Roumania, so far as the +peasantry is concerned, the pre-emancipation conditions remain +practically, if not legally, in force. Owing to the increase of +population, the minute subdivision of the estates of the peasants, the +backwardness of their agricultural methods, and their over-taxation, +the position of the peasants has been rendered precarious. +Revolutionary uprisings directed chiefly against the landed +proprietors have been a recurring expression of their discontent. + +An important consequence has been the rapid evolution of the +industrial and commercial, or the middle class. The growth of the +middle class has been accompanied by a struggle in each of these +countries between the privileged classes of the feudal state and the +middle class, including in the latter the educated classes and the +industrial workers of the towns. + +It is in this middle class that the Jews are chiefly to be found. +Owing to this fact, as well as through the action of historical +conditions, the Jews occupy an exceptional position in the economic +activities and the social life of each of the countries of Eastern +Europe. A survey of their economic and social position in each country +will serve to clarify the last thirty years of their history in +Eastern Europe and to give some of the causes underlying their vast +movement from these countries to Western Europe and particularly to +the United States. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[2] Kovalevsky, _La crise russe_ (Paris, 1906), p. 111. + +[3] _Cf._ Witte, _Vorlesungen ueber Volks- und Staatswirtschaft_ +(Stuttgart and Berlin, 1913), p. 40. + +Milyoukov, _Russia and its Crisis_ (University of Chicago Press, +1905), p. 439. + +[4] _Cf._ Witte, _op. cit._, p. 52. + +[5] _Cf._ Milyoukov, _op. cit._, p. 246 _et seq._ + +[6] An interesting statement of the principles of the Slavophiles may +be obtained from Simkhovitch (_International Quarterly_, Oct., 1904). + +[7] White, _Autobiography_ (New York, 1905), vol. ii, p. 35. + +[8] Owing to the similarity of conditions in Russia and Roumania, +particularly as regards the Jews, Roumania has been considered, +practically throughout, immediately after Russia. + +[9] Kogalniceancu, "Die Agrarfrage in Rumaenien" _Archiv fuer +Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik_, vol. xxxii, p. 804. + +[10] _Ibid._, p. 184. + +Jorga, _Geschichte des Rumaenischen Volkes_ (Gotha, 1905), vol. ii, p. +374. + + + + +CHAPTER III + +THE JEWS IN EASTERN EUROPE: ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL POSITION + + +The economic and social life of the Jews in Eastern Europe has moved +along the familiar channels of commerce, industry and urban life +characteristic of the Jews in all countries during the middle ages. An +examination of the economic position and function and the principal +social characteristics of the Jews reveals the fact that they play an +important part in each of these countries. This we shall see by +tracing their principal economic activities and some significant +phases of their social life. + + +I. RUSSIA + +A review of the occupations of the Jews in the Russian Empire shows +that those engaged in the manufacturing and mechanical pursuits +constituted 39 per cent of the total Jewish population gainfully +employed. This was the largest occupational group. Commerce engaged 32 +per cent. Together the industrial and commercial classes comprised +seven-tenths of all Jews engaged in gainful occupations. On the other +hand, only 3 per cent were employed in agricultural pursuits. + +It is in comparison with the occupations of the non-Jewish population +in Russia that the significance of this distribution becomes evident. +Of the non-Jews in Russia, agricultural pursuits engaged 61 per cent, +manufacturing and mechanical pursuits 15 per cent, and commerce only 3 +per cent. The non-Jews engaged in industry and commerce thus +constituted somewhat less than one-fifth of the total non-Jewish +population gainfully employed. More than twice as many Jews, +relatively, as non-Jews were engaged in industrial pursuits and +practically twelve times as many Jews as non-Jews in commercial +pursuits.[11] + +This difference of occupational grouping makes itself felt in the +participation of the Jews in the principal occupational groups. Of the +total Russian population gainfully employed, the Jews were 5 per cent. +They constituted, however, 11 per cent of all engaged in industry, and +36 per cent of all engaged in commerce.[12] Thus, in the Russian +Empire the Jews formed a considerable proportion of the commercial +classes and a large proportion of those engaged in industrial +pursuits. + +Properly to gauge the economic function of the Jews in Russia, +comparison should be made not with the population of the Russian +Empire but rather with that of the Pale of Settlement, where nearly 95 +per cent of the Jews live. There the contrast was even stronger. Of +the Jews, 70 per cent were employed in industry and commerce as +compared with 13 per cent on the part of the non-Jews. Though the Jews +are only 12 per cent of the total working population of the Pale, they +formed 32 per cent of all engaged in industry and 77 per cent of all +engaged in commerce.[13] This clearly shows that the Jews constituted +the commercial classes and a significant part of the industrial +classes of the Pale. In other words, what is true of the place of the +Jews in the occupational distribution of all Russia is still more true +of the Pale. The Jews are preponderatingly industrial and commercial, +in striking contrast to the rest of the population, which is +preponderatingly agricultural. + +What is the nature of their activities and their function in the +industrial and commercial life of Russia? The great majority of Jews +engaged in manufacturing and mechanical pursuits are artisans. In the +present relatively backward stage of Russian industrial development +these are chiefly handicraftsmen, who mainly supply the needs of local +consumers. These artisans, who number more than half a million,[14] +support nearly one-third of the Jewish population. + +The most important industry is the manufacture of clothing and wearing +apparel, which employed more than one-third of the Jewish working +population and supported more than one-seventh of the total Jewish +population. It is in effect a Jewish industry: practically all the +tailors and shoemakers in the Pale are Jews. They predominate as well +in the preparation of food products, in the building trades, in the +metal, wood and tobacco industries.[15] Hampered by legal +restrictions, lack of technical education, and lack of capital, they +nevertheless have become an essential part of the economic life of the +Pale, supplying the needs for industrial products not only of the Jews +but of the entire Pale, and, especially of the peasants. + +In the development of large-scale industry, the Jews have taken a +smaller part than the Germans or foreigners, owing to the conditions +above referred to. Yet, in 1898, in the fifteen provinces of the Pale, +more than one-third of the factories were in Jewish hands.[16] Jewish +factory workers were estimated at one-fifth of all the factory +workers in the Pale.[17] + +Trade and commerce engage Jews chiefly, supporting nearly two-thirds +of the total Jewish population.[18] + +As Russia is essentially an agricultural country, trade in +agricultural products, such as grain, cattle, furs and hides, _etc._, +is of prime importance. Nearly half of the Jewish merchants in the +Pale were dealers in these products. Of the dealers in the principal +grain products, Jews formed an overwhelming majority. Relatively +twenty-six times as many Jews as Russians, in the Pale, were grain +dealers.[19] Four-fifths of all the dealers in furs and hides, +three-fourths of all the dealers in cattle were Jews.[20] The Jewish +traders are agents in the movement of the crops, in the various stages +from the direct purchase of the grain from the peasant to its export +for the world markets. In view of the lack of development in Russia of +modern methods for marketing the agricultural produce, and in view of +the fact that the Russian peasant is ignorant of the most elementary +principles of trade, the Jewish merchants, with their knowledge of the +market and their skillful use of credit, play a vital part in the +organization of the Russian grain trade, and control this trade in the +Pale and on the Black Sea. + +In other branches of commerce, the Jews are almost as strongly +represented. As sellers to the village and city populations, they +carry on the largest part of the retail trade of the Pale. The great +majority of the merchants, however, are petty traders or +store-keepers. The wholesale merchants enrolled in the guilds, on the +other hand, constitute a large proportion of all the guild merchants. + +Thus, through their activity as petty artisans, traders and merchants, +the Jews preponderate in the industrial and commercial life of the +Pale. As manufacturers and wholesale merchants they play a less +important but nevertheless significant part in all Russia. + +In general the Jewish merchants are quite strongly distinguished from +the Russian merchants in their employment of the competitive +principles and methods common to the commercial operations of Western +Europe and the United States. Their principle of a quick turnover with +a small profit, and their use of credit, are not in vogue among the +Russian merchants who operate on the basis of customary prices and +long credits. + +In their social characteristics as well, the Jews are strongly set off +from the rest of the population. The Jews are essentially urban, the +non-Jews are overwhelmingly rural. In all Russia, 51 per cent of the +Jews lived in incorporated towns, as against only 12 per cent of the +non-Jews. Though the Jews constituted 4 per cent of the total +population, they constituted 16 per cent of the town population.[21] +In the Pale, where they constituted 12 per cent of the total +population, they comprised 38 per cent of the urban population.[22] +Their concentration in the cities of the Pale is striking. In nine out +of the fifteen provinces of the Pale, they constituted a majority of +the urban population. In twenty-four towns, they were from two-fifths +to seven-tenths of the population. In the important cities of Warsaw +and Odessa they were one-third of the population.[23] + +The urban and occupational distribution of the Jews places them higher +than the great majority of the non-Jews among the social classes into +which the Russian people are legally divided. Townsmen are of a higher +rank than peasants. Nearly 95 per cent of the Jews belong to this +category and only 7 per cent of the Russians. The vast majority of the +Russians--86 per cent--are peasants. Only 4 per cent of the Jews are +of this class. Again, 2 per cent of the Jews are merchants, as against +only .2 per cent of the Russians. Thus in these two classes of +townsmen and merchants there were twelve times as many Jews, +relatively, as Russians.[24] + +The higher cultural standing of the Jews may be partly measured by the +relative literacy of the Jews and of the total population. According +to the census of 1897, in the Jewish population ten years of age or +over there were relatively one and a half times as many literates as +in the total population of the corresponding group. In each of the +age-groups there were relatively more literates among the Jews than +among the total population. In the highest age-group, that of sixty +years of age and over, the Jews had relatively more literates than any +of the age-groups of the total population, indicating that the +educational standing of the Jews half a century ago was higher than +that of the Russian population of to-day.[25] + +The fact that the Jews dwell chiefly in towns has considerably to do +with their higher educational standing. If the statistics of relative +literacy of the Jewish and the non-Jewish population in the towns were +obtainable, the chances are strong that they would not show a much +higher rate of literacy on the part of the Jews. At the same time the +difficulties that are put in the way of Jewish attendance in the +elementary schools must be regarded as a considerable factor in +explaining this possibility.[26] + +The participation of the Jews in the liberal professions, which +implies the possession of a higher education, is also very large, even +with the great obstacles that have been placed in the way of the +entrance of the Jews into the universities, into the liberal +professions and the state service. Relatively seven times as many Jews +as Russians are found in the liberal professions.[27] + + +II. ROUMANIA + +The economic activities of the Jews in Roumanian industry and commerce +closely resemble those of their Russian brethren.[28] The large part +taken by the Jews in Roumanian commerce may be gathered from the fact +that, in 1904, one-fifth of those who paid the merchant-license tax +were Jews. Equally great is their participation in large-scale +industry, where, as an inquiry in 1901-2 shows, nearly one-fifth of +the large industries were conducted by Jewish entrepreneurs. In some +of the most important ones--the glass industry, the clothing industry, +the wood and furniture industry and the textile industry--from +one-fourth to one-half of the total number of entrepreneurs were Jews. + +As in the case of Russia, it is in _Klein-industrie_ or handicraft, +which is more nearly characteristic of the present form of Roumanian +industrial economy, that the Jews are mostly concentrated and where +they participate so largely as to constitute "the backbone of the +young Roumanian industry". + +The latest inquiry--that of 1908--shows that the Jews were one-fifth +of all inscribed in the corporations as artisans. They formed more +than one-fourth of the master-workmen and nearly one-sixth of the +laborers. In the five principal industries Jewish master-workmen +formed from nearly one-tenth to nearly one-half. In the following +trades Jews formed between one-fourth and nearly two-thirds of the +entire workers: watchmakers, tinners, modistes, tailors, glazers, +housepainters, coopers and bookbinders. In all the garment industries +nearly one-third of the workers were Jews. The principal trades of the +Jews, in which two-thirds of the Jewish industrial workers were found, +were, in order: tailors, shoemakers, tinners, joiners and planers, and +bakers.[29] The Jews in Roumania were thus more strongly concentrated +in industry and less in commerce than their Russian brethren. + +As masters and workmen they play a part in Roumanian large-scale and +small-scale industry nearly four and a half times as large as their +proportion in the total population. Their participation in commerce is +equally large. + +The Jews in Roumania present the same social characteristics, +relatively to the surrounding population, as the Jews in Russia. The +Jews were overwhelmingly concentrated in the towns. 80 per cent of the +Jews dwelt in the towns; 84 per cent of the non-Jews dwelt in the +villages. Of the population in the department-capitals the Jews +constituted one-fifth. Of the population of the other towns they +constituted more than one-tenth. In some of the department-capitals, +notably Jassi, the Jews were a majority of the total population. In +six other department-capitals they constituted from one-fourth to +one-half of the population. + +That the Jews are of a higher educational standing than the Roumanians +is seen in the fact that they possessed a higher rate of literacy, +having relatively twice as many literates among the males and nearly +twice as many among the females. Confining this comparison to the +cities, however, we find that the Jews had a higher literacy only in +the age-groups above fifteen. The Roumanian urban population between +the ages of seven and fifteen showed a higher literacy than the +corresponding group among the Jews, indicating the influence of the +special restrictions on Jewish education which will later be +discussed. + +While the higher literacy of the Jews in Russia and Roumania is due +partly to residence in towns, the restrictions on the Jewish +participation in the educational facilities afforded by the Russian +and Roumanian governments have been so great as to make the higher +educational standing of the Jews practically a product of their own +efforts. + + +III. AUSTRIA-HUNGARY + +The economic position of the Jews in Austria-Hungary presents a close +parallel to that in Russia. The largest proportion of the Jews--44 per +cent--were engaged in commerce and in trade, and 29 per cent were +engaged in industry.[30] A significantly large proportion were engaged +in public service and in the liberal professions. A surprisingly large +proportion--11 per cent--were engaged in agriculture and allied +occupations. Thus, a little over seven-tenths of the Jews were +concentrated in commerce and trade, and industry. + +The contrast between the Jewish and the non-Jewish population is most +striking in the relative proportions of those engaged in agriculture, +and commerce and trade. 54 per cent of the non-Jews were engaged in +agriculture, or five times as many, relatively, as Jews. On the other +hand, only 8 per cent were engaged in commerce and trade, or +relatively one-fifth as many as Jews. + +Of the total population engaged in commerce and trade the Jews +constituted 21 per cent. They constituted, on the other hand, 5 per +cent of all engaged in industry. Thus, the Jews in Austria-Hungary +were concentrated in commerce and trade to a much larger extent than +in all other occupations, constituting an important part of all +engaged in this branch. + +It is in Galicia, however, where conditions in general most resemble +those in Russia, that the Jews are seen to occupy relatively the same +position as their brethren in Russia. In Galicia, 29 per cent of the +Jews were engaged in commerce and trade, and 26 per cent in industry. +Together the Jews engaged in these two branches constituted more than +half of the total Jewish working population. + +By far the largest part of the non-Jewish population--86 per +cent--were engaged in agriculture. In industry only 4 per cent of the +non-Jews were engaged and in commerce only 1 per cent. Thus the Jews +were largely concentrated in commerce and industry, the non-Jews +preponderatingly concentrated in agriculture. + +As compared with the Jews in Russia and Roumania the Galician Jews +engaged in agriculture show a surprising proportion--18 per cent being +so engaged--a larger proportion than in any other country. + +The Jews in East Galicia were 13 per cent of the total +population.[31] Of all the "independents" engaged in commerce in East +Galicia 92 per cent were Jews; of all the "independents" engaged in +industry 48 per cent were Jews. The Jews in West Galicia were 8 per +cent of the total population. Of all "independents" engaged in +commerce they constituted 82 per cent; of all "independents" engaged +in industry they constituted 33 per cent. This gives the crux of the +economic position of the Jews in Galicia. They play an overwhelming +part in its commercial life, practically monopolizing it. In industry +their participation is very significant. + +Socially the Jews in Austria-Hungary and especially in Galicia, +present characteristics similar to those in Russia and Roumania. In +the forty cities in Galicia with a population above five thousand +there dwelt 34 per cent of the total Jewish population. Only 7 per +cent of the non-Jewish population lived in these cities. Thus, +relatively five times as many Jews as non-Jews were urban. Though the +Jews in Galicia were 11 per cent of the total population, they +constituted 37 per cent of the population in these cities, thus being +represented in the cities by more than three times their proportion in +the total population. In nine of these towns they formed a majority of +the population. They were more than one-third in twelve, and more than +one-fourth in eleven other towns. In the two chief cities in +Galicia--Lemberg and Cracow--they constituted a third of the total +population. + +The figures regarding literacy are not available for Austria-Hungary +or Galicia, but there is every reason to believe that essentially the +same situation exists as in Russia and Roumania. In the liberal +professions in Austria-Hungary there were 16 per cent of the Jews so +engaged as compared with 11 per cent of the non-Jews. In Galicia the +contrast is much sharper. Relatively ten times as many Jews as +non-Jews were represented in the liberal professions.[32] + + +IV. SUMMARY + +A review of the occupations, economic function and social +characteristics of the Jews in the countries of Eastern Europe reveals +them in an important and essentially similar role in each country. +Pursuing mainly industrial and commercial occupations, the Jews +constitute by far the largest part of the middle classes of each +country. The historical position which they held in the ancient +kingdom of Poland as the middle class has been practically maintained +to this day. + +By virtue of their occupations, the Jews are possessed of liquid +wealth to a greater extent than the nobility or the peasantry, and in +the lack of proper credit facilities still serve as bankers and +money-lenders. The Jews have also been conspicuous in Eastern Europe +as stewards or administrators of the estates of the nobility, who are, +as a rule, absentee landlords, distinguished as a class by their +serious lack of interest or ability in the management of their +estates. The Jewish _Hofjuden_, as they were known, were particularly +useful in the utilization of the products of the soil, through +distilleries, mills, trade with agricultural products and exploitation +of the forests.[33] In this way, however, Jews often acted as +intermediaries in the oppression of the peasantry by the nobles. They +were often keepers or lessees of the taverns, the ownership of which +was formerly vested in the nobles as one of their feudal privileges. + +It is, however, as artisans, industrial laborers and merchants, +retail and wholesale, that Jews chiefly obtain their living. Their +monopoly of industry and commerce has given them an influence far +above their numerical proportions. + +In each of these countries, again, the Jews are essentially town +dwellers in the midst of preponderatingly rural populations. That the +degree of the contrast is due to the artificial workings of +restrictive laws is unquestioned. The chief reason for this, however, +is occupational. The Jews as an industrial and commercial people +constitute one of the main elements out of which the town populations +are recruited. Towns are ordinarily the foci of all the cultural +forces and the movement and enterprise of a country. In Eastern +Europe, where the number of towns is so few, this is much more the +case than in Western Europe. The fact that the Jews are so largely +concentrated in these comparatively few towns serves to give them a +cultural position and influence far out of proportion to their +numbers. Their economic activities and their relatively large +participation in the liberal professions strengthens this position +considerably. + +Amidst populations preponderatingly devoted to agricultural +occupations and dwelling in villages, the Jews represent an industrial +and commercial people, strongly concentrated in towns. This economic +and social position of the Jews is of the greatest significance, +especially in the present period of transition in these countries. +Possessed of the characteristics of a modern people in their economic +and social life and in their mentality, they present a sharp contrast +with the peoples among whom they dwell and whose economic and social +life are only now taking on modern forms. It is this that makes the +Jews personify in a large degree the forces of economic enterprise and +of social progress in these countries. + +On the other hand, the exceptional economic and social position held +by the Jews among the East-European peoples has made them peculiarly +susceptible to the changes that have been taking place, as their +inferior legal status and sharp differentiation from the mass of the +people have made them favorable objects of attack in the +politico-economic struggles that have largely accompanied the +transition. + +A consideration of the legal status of the Jews in each of the +countries of Eastern Europe and of the chief forces that have ruled +their history for more than a third of a century will enable us to see +some of the dynamic aspects of the recent history of the East-European +Jews and the underlying causes of their recent emigration. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[11] Rubinow, _Economic Condition of the Jews in Russia_ (Washington, +1907), p. 500. + +[12] _Cf._ table IA, p. 158. + +[13] _Cf._ table IB, p. 158. + +Rubinow, _op. cit._, p. 501. + +[14] Margolin puts the number at 600,000. + +[15] Ruppin, _Die Sozialen Verhaeltnisse der Juden in Russland_ +(Berlin, 1906), p. 59. + +[16] Rubinow, _op. cit._, p. 537. + +[17] Rubinow, _op. cit._, p. 542. + +[18] _Ibid._, p. 553. + +[19] Ruppin, _op. cit._, p. 62. + +[20] Rubinow, _op. cit._, p. 556. + +[21] Ruppin, _op. cit._, p. 100. + +[22] Rubinow, _op. cit._, p. 493. + +[23] Ruppin, _op. cit._, p. 19. + +[24] Ruppin, _op. cit._, p. 65. + +[25] Rubinow, _op. cit._, pp. 577-578. + +[26] In a personal communication to the writer, Dr. Rubinow gives it +as his opinion that the Jews as a group consisting primarily of +artisans and merchants will show a very much higher rate of literacy +than a group of factory employes, and, we may add, of unskilled +laborers, to which groups the majority of the non-Jews in the towns +belong. + +[27] Ruppin, _op. cit._, p. 62. + +[28] On the economic activities and social characteristics of the Jews +in Roumania, _cf._ Ruppin, _Die Juden in Rumaenien_, p. 27 _et seq._ + +[29] _Enquete sur les artisans_ (Bucarest, 1909), p. 157 _et seq._ + +[30] Thon, _Die Juden in Oesterreich_ (Berlin, 1908), p. 112. + +[31] Thon, _op. cit._, p. 124. + +[32] Thon, _op. cit._, p. 127. + +[33] _Grenzboten: Galizische Wirtschaft_, vol. lxii, p. 402. + + + + +CHAPTER IV + +THIRTY YEARS OF JEWISH HISTORY IN EASTERN EUROPE + + +I. RUSSIA + +Religious intolerance had been the prime motive of Russia's policy of +completely excluding the Jews from her borders. Through the partitions +of Poland from 1772 to 1795, she became the unwilling ruler over the +destinies of millions of Jews living in Lithuania, Western and +Southwestern Russia and Poland proper. The historic medieval principle +by which the Jews were regarded as an alien and heretic race living +among the Christian peoples--a principle that had, with the growth of +modern ideas, been rapidly losing its hold upon the West-European +nations--expressed Russia's attitude towards the Jews and conformed to +her strongly medieval outlook and organization of this period. Thus, +at the time when the emancipation of the Jews had begun to be in +Western Europe a concomitant of social progress, Russia set to work to +recreate almost typically medieval conditions for a vaster Jewish +population than had ever before been assembled in any European +country. + +The Jews were placed in the position practically of aliens, whose +activities were regulated by special laws. The first and the most +far-reaching of these laws limited their right of residence to those +provinces in which they lived at the time of the Polish partitions. In +this way originated that reproduction on a vast scale of the medieval +Ghetto--the Pale of Jewish Settlement. The elementary right of free +movement and choice of residence, which was denied to the Jews, has +remained the principal restriction to which they are subjected. + +The Pale of Jewish Settlement, continued with but few changes to our +day, includes the fifteen provinces of Western and Southwestern +Russia--Vilna, Kovno, Grodno, Minsk, Vitebsk, Mohileff, Volhynia, +Podolia, Kiev (except the city of Kiev), Chernigov, Poltava, +Bessarabia, Kherson, Jekaterinoslav, Taurida (except the city of +Yalta), and the ten provinces into which Poland is divided--Warsaw, +Kalisz, Kielce, Lomza, Lublin, Petrikow, Plock, Radom, Suvalk and +Siedlec. From the rest of the eighty-nine provinces and +territories--constituting nearly 95 per cent of the total territory of +the Russian Empire--the Jews were excluded. + +In the course of a century the special laws relating to the Jews have +multiplied greatly until they now consist of more than a thousand +articles, regulating their religious and communal life, economic +activities and occupations, military service, property rights, +education, _etc._, and imposing special taxes over and above those +borne by all other Russian subjects. The direct consequence of these +laws was to mark the status of the Jews as the lowest in the Empire, +placing them in the position of aliens as to rights and citizens as to +obligations.[34] + +The policy of the Russian government throughout the 19th century has +been full of contrasts and contradictions. Attempts at forcible +russification and assimilation, which with Nicholas I practically +spelled conversion, have alternated with methods of repression which +sought to prevent closer contact between the Jewish and the native +populations. + +It was the liberal epoch of Alexander II that gave the first real +promise of emancipation to Russian Jewry. The great reforms of this +era benefited the Jews along with the other subjects of the Empire. +With the influence of the liberals over the government there came a +new attitude regarding the Jews and their value as economic and +cultural forces. Partly to relieve the intense competition in the +Pale, harmful both to the Christian and the Jewish populations, but +chiefly to give the provinces of interior Russia the benefit of the +superior industrial and commercial, and professional abilities of the +Jews, laws were enacted allowing certain classes of Jews to live +outside of the Pale. These were, chiefly, master-artisans, merchants +of the first guild, students and graduates of universities and higher +educational institutions, and members of the liberal professions. + +With these laws and with the opening of the high schools and +universities to the Jews, the movement for Russianization received a +mighty impetus. Though these reforms, hedged about and limited by +onerous conditions, affected comparatively few and hardly touched the +life of the Jewish masses in a radical way, nevertheless, the impulse +which even these relatively slight reforms gave to the current of +Jewish life in Russia was far out of proportion to the relief they +afforded. Jewish hopes for a final emancipation soared high: it seemed +as if the walls of the Pale needed but little more to be broken down. + +The reaction that followed the assassination of Alexander II fell upon +the Jews as a national calamity. To the feudal party which now came +into control, the Jews seemed the very embodiment of the forces in the +Empire whose progress they were seeking to stem. No other nationality +in the Russian Empire concentrated in itself so many characteristics +and tendencies opposed to the ideals and interests of the Russian +ruling classes. To the Church, dominated by a religio-national point +of view, they were the very opposite of her ideal type of Russian +orthodox, their very existence in Russia being regarded as an anomaly +and as an actual and possible influence in disintegrating the +religious faith of the orthodox peasants. To the nationalists they +were an alien people racially and religiously, whose assimilation with +the Russian people was neither possible nor desirable. To the +autocracy and the bureaucracy there was the added fear from their +intellectual superiority and their zeal for education of their playing +a powerful part among the liberal forces seeking political freedom. +Indeed, the Jews, whose economic and cultural activities and interests +bound them closely to Western Europe and were in themselves +modernizing and liberalizing influences, growing all the stronger +through the greater freedom offered them during the liberal epoch, +excited the deep repugnance of the feudal forces now directing the +destinies of the state. To them the Jews spelled anathema. Separated +from the great masses of the Russian people by race, nationality, +religion, occupations and other social and psychological +characteristics, they offered an unusually favorable object of attack. + +It soon became clear that the new regime had determined upon making +the Jews a central feature in their policy of reaction. At once a +many-sided campaign against the Jews was begun. A powerful machinery +of persecution was at hand in the existing Jewish laws. All that was +necessary was to revive them, to interpret them rigorously, to tighten +the legislative screws which had become loosened during the preceding +liberal regime. This, however, seemed insufficient. It was determined +that a powerful and definitive blow must be struck at the roots of +their very existence in Russia. + +The main attack was economic. The industrial and commercial activities +of the Jews, especially in the Pale, make them, as we have seen, among +the chief industrial producers for the peasants, as well as the chief +buyers of their agricultural produce. This contact between the Jews +and the peasants was a vital need in the economic life of both. The +familiar charge that the Jews were exploiters of the peasantry was +revived. Behind this charge lay the medieval economic prejudice, which +attributes no really useful role to the merchant or trader.[35] In a +custom-ridden economic order, the competitive methods of the Jewish +traders smacked of commercial deceit. Principally, however, this +charge served for a convenient explanation of the change of policy +towards the Jews. + +In this wise were introduced the "Temporary Regulations" of May, 1882, +or the May Laws, the main clauses of which are the following: + + 1. As a temporary measure and until a general revision is made + of the legal status of the Jews, they are forbidden to settle + anew outside of towns and townlets (boroughs), an exception + being made only in the case of existing Jewish agricultural + colonies. + + 2. Until further orders, the execution of deeds of sale and + mortgage in the names of Jews is forbidden, as well as the + registration of Jews as lessees of real estate situated outside + of towns and townlets, and also the issuing to Jews of powers of + stewardship or attorney to manage and dispose of such real + property. + +The May Laws may be regarded as an extension of the general principle +underlying the creation of the Pale. Through the first clause they +were now to be forbidden free movement even within the Pale. As far as +possible, their contact with the peasantry was to be cut off. The +second clause aimed to put an end to the ownership by Jews of land in +rural districts and the employment of Jews as stewards or managers of +estates. A further construction of this clause forbade Jews to be +connected with any business directly or indirectly depending upon the +purchase of landed property outside of the towns of the Pale, thus +debarring them from the utilization of land for industrial and +commercial, as well as for agricultural purposes. + +In the actual execution of these laws, and in the legal +interpretations given them by the highest courts, the effect was far +greater. A series of wholesale expulsions from the villages into the +towns of the Pale began, on the ground of illegal residence. This was +increased by the device, which became normal, of renaming towns as +villages--easily possible in Russia where towns are frequently only +administrative units--the resident Jews then being expelled as illegal +settlers. Again, movement within the villages even on the part of Jews +who had the right to live in villages was prohibited. + +A further effect of this change in policy was upon the position of the +Jews outside of the Pale, who enjoyed the right of residence in the +interior of Russia, through the laws of the preceding regime. A +stricter interpretation of these laws, added to a change in the +administrative policy, had the effect not only of stopping the +comparatively slight current of Jewish artisans into the interior of +Russia, but also of starting a never-ending series of expulsions from +the interior to the Pale. These expulsions have since continued, with +individuals, families and whole groups, until they have become a +constant phenomenon of Jewish life in Russia and a familiar item of +world news. + +While the May Laws thus touched to the quick the economic life of the +Russian Jews, another series of laws sought to break down their +cultural life by barring them from the higher educational and +professional institutions. The contrast with the policy of the +preceding regime was here as complete as possible. The principle of +liberal assimilation with regard to the Jews had dictated the policy +of opening wide to them the doors of the secondary schools and +universities, and the liberal professions. The new regime, however, +not only opposed education generally, and higher education +particularly, as the means by which the reform and westernization of +Russia was being accomplished, but it regarded the russification of +the Jews as a special evil. Culturally as well, the Jews were to be +separated from the Russian people. + +Hence the introduction of the "percentage rule" in 1886 and 1887, +restricting the proportion of Jewish students admitted to the +secondary and high schools, and universities, within the Pale, to 10 +per cent of the total number of students admitted. Outside of the +Pale, the proportion was 5 per cent, except in St. Petersburg and +Moscow, where it was placed at 3 per cent. In addition, the Jews were +completely barred from a number of these institutions. As the Jews +constituted so large a part of the populations in the towns of the +Pale and had distinguished themselves in Russia as elsewhere by the +eagerness with which they grasped the educational and professional +opportunities offered them, the introduction of the "percentage rule" +meant that the vast majority of the Jewish youth were to be deprived +of the normal chances for education. Thus the "percentage rule", which +was extended to institutions founded by the Jews themselves, was +almost as great a blow as the May Laws. It threatened the cultural +ruin of Russian Jewry. Bound up as the admission to these schools was +with the liberal professions and with the opportunity of escaping from +the limits of the Pale, it meant that one of the main highways to +freedom in Russia had been closed to the Jews. + +The most striking method of repression introduced by the new regime +and its feudal supporters was that combination of murder, outrage and +pillage--the _pogrom_. The revival of this characteristic expression +of the antisemitism of the middle ages was not the result of +spontaneous outbreaks of fury on the part of the Russian masses, but a +deliberate and calculated awakening of latent racial and religious +prejudices, evoked as powerful aids to inflame against the Jews the +Russian masses, who are, religiously speaking, a tolerant people and +whose relations to the Jews had been marked, on the whole, with +friendliness. + +The first _pogroms_ began a month after the accession of Alexander III +to the throne, and extended in the course of a year to 160 places in +Southern Russia. Though the connivance of the local authorities was +clearly established, the originators of the _pogroms_ were never +found.[36] However, moral support was lent by the government in the +promulgation of the May Laws which closely followed. The doctrine that +the misery of the peasants was due to their exploitation by the Jews, +and that the _pogroms_ were the instinctive expression of the fury of +the peasants, was officially sanctioned. The _pogroms_ of 1881-2 +served as notice to all Russia and particularly to Russian Jewry, that +the old order had given place to the new. Apart from the loss of life +and damage to property they left the Russian Jews in a state of +stupefaction and horror, with the sense of living on the brink of a +precipice. + +The first decade of Alexander III's reign had opened with these +_pogroms_. The second decade opened with the wholesale expulsions from +Moscow. Within six months, more than ten thousand Jews were expelled +from the city on the ground of illegal residence. So vast a number of +Jewish families was affected and so summary was the manner of +executing the decree of expulsion, that several governments, among +them our own, protested to the Russian government. President Harrison, +discussing this protest in his message to Congress, frankly stated +that + + the banishment, whether by direct decree or by not less certain + indirect methods, of so large a number of men and women is not a + local question. A decree to leave one country is in the nature + of things an order to enter another--some other. This + consideration, as well as the suggestion of humanity, furnishes + ample ground for the remonstrances which we have presented to + Russia.[37] + +The expulsions were preceded by a year of ominous rumors of a program +of new restrictions beside which the May Laws would pale into +insignificance. An offer of ten million dollars for the cause of +Jewish education made by Baron de Hirsch to the Russian government was +refused. His scheme, however, for the organization of a +mass-emigration of Jews to Argentine was sanctioned. All these facts +lent strength to the feeling of the Jews that they had nothing to hope +for under the existing regime. Thus closed the reign of Alexander III +and a memorable chapter in Russian Jewish history. + +The early years of Nicholas II were marked by a relaxation in the +strict administration and interpretation of the existing restrictive +laws. Hopes for the amelioration of the Jewish situation began to be +entertained. These hopes were destined shortly to be shattered. + +The first decade of the twentieth century opened with threatening +unrest. Economic depression began and was accompanied by revolutionary +attacks. For the Jews, the most alarming symptom was the rise and +uninterrupted progress of a group of antisemitic agitators and Russian +loyalists, who sought to counteract the revolutionary movement by +denouncing the Jews as the leaders of the revolution and the enemies +of the autocracy and the Orthodox religion. Thus was sown the seed of +the Kishineff massacre of April, 1903, which lasted three days. Before +the echoes of Kishineff had died away, the massacre at Gomel followed. + +But Kishineff proved to be merely a bloody prelude. The air was +surcharged with explosives. The outbreak of the Russo-Japanese war and +of the first organized revolution created a dangerous combination of +events for the Jews. To the discontent of the peasants, forced to go +to the front in a war for which they had no enthusiasm, and sore with +the reverses of the Russian army, was added the increased activity of +the agitators who declared that the war with Japan had been forced +upon Russia by the Jews, eager to profit through its ruin, and who +called upon their followers and the peasants through propaganda and +proclamations to revenge themselves upon the Jews. The government at +bay, on the verge of breakdown under the revolutionary attacks, and +anxious to excuse its incompetency and failure in the conduct of the +war, sought a means of diverting the peasants from the uprisings +against the landed proprietors spreading over the land, and, above +all, of stifling the revolution, which had met with such opportune +and unlooked-for success among all classes. This was a situation +alive with danger for the Jews, whose proletarians in the cities had +taken an active part in the revolution. The organization of Jewish +massacres by responsible agents of the government became the central +feature of its program of counter-revolution.[38] A veritable +holocaust ensued in nearly every province of the Empire for two years, +only the climaxes of which became known to the world in Zhitomir, +Odessa, Bialystok, and Siedlec. + +The role of the bureaucracy in the creation of the _pogroms_, +especially in 1906, in which year there took place hundreds of +_pogroms_, was made abundantly clear by the Russian press, by Prince +Urussov's disclosures in the Duma, and by the report of the Duma +Commission appointed to investigate the causes of the Bialystok +_pogrom_ of 1906. As announced in their official report, an +investigation had shown that the relations between the Jews and the +Christians of Bialystok previous to the bloodshed had been amicable, +and that preparations for a _pogrom_ had been deliberately and +carefully made by agents of the bureaucracy and carried out with the +aid of the local authorities. + +Both periods of _pogroms_ in these thirty years were periods of +revolution. In both the government had felt the ground shaking under +its feet from terroristic attacks and from peasant uprisings. In the +first period Jews had taken only slight part. In the late revolution, +however, the participation of the Jews of the Pale, through the Jewish +labor organization, the _Bund_, was quite strong. The earlier +_pogroms_ gave a hint as to the policy of the new regime. The later +ones occurred at the end of years of repression and persecution, and +were a culminating point in the fury of the reactionary forces at +their failure to stem the tide of liberalism in the struggle for +parliamentary institutions and for the rights of citizens in a modern +state. + +The results of these thirty years of reaction remain to be considered. +Though the effects of the _pogroms_ upon the Russian Jews can hardly +be overestimated, the less evident, because less spectacular, methods +of restrictive law and administrative action have in the long run left +a far more enduring impress. + +The introduction of the May Laws at the very beginning of the eighties +awakened the Jews to the realization that their future in Russia was +threatened. The May Laws and the laws that were developed from them, +the obstacles that were placed in the way of Jewish education and, in +general, the administrative difficulties that were created, have +affected every movement of their life. + +Freedom of movement of the individual is the very essence of the life +of modern states and the basis of their economic, social and political +institutions. The lack of this freedom, especially to the extent +created by the May Laws, bars the Jews from the possibilities of +normal economic growth and progress. The Jewish manufacturers and +capitalists are prevented from participating in the industrial and +commercial development of Russia, which is so rapidly proceeding and +to which, owing to their economic position and capacities, they could +powerfully contribute. Legal interference with economic activities, so +frequently the rule in Russia, is emphasized in the case of the Jews. + +A far more serious situation confronts the great mass of the Jewish +artisans, petty merchants and factory workers, to which the vast +majority of the Jews belong. Largely prevented access to their natural +customers, the peasants, by the prohibition of rural residence, and +confined to the relatively few towns of the Pale, where over-crowding +and over-competition are the necessary and unavoidable results, the +Jewish artisans and petty merchants have a bitter struggle to maintain +a position of economic independence. + +Added to this, there is the social pressure to which the Jews have +been subjected. Not until this period has the century-long position of +the Jews as the "pariahs of the Empire" been so sharply emphasized. +Enmeshed in a net of special laws and regulations, at the mercy of +ministerial decree, secret circular, arbitrary administrative act, law +has lost all meaning for the Jews. In this atmosphere they exist +mainly through bribery, at once their bane and their salvation. + +The unusual economic and social pressure exerted by the reactionary +regime upon its Jewish subjects, through the new restrictive laws that +were put into operation during the last thirty years, the +administrative harrying that became the order of the day and the +introduction of the hitherto unused method of physical repression, the +_pogrom_, becomes clear in the light of its policy. Beginning as a +movement to suppress the Jews in their economic and cultural +activities, and to separate them as far as possible from their Russian +neighbors, the anti-Jewish program became in its final form the +expulsion and extermination of the Jews from Russia. The historic +sentence of Count Ignatiev, author of the May Laws, at the very +beginning of this period, "the Western borders are open to you Jews", +strikes the keynote of this policy. And, in fact, for practically the +first time in its history, the Russian government relaxed in 1892 its +rigorous rules forbidding emigration, and gave its sanction to Baron +de Hirsch's plan of organizing a vast emigration of Jews from Russia, +which its author hoped would, at the end of a quarter of a century, +result in the complete transplantation of the Jews from Russia. The +famous principle of the Russian government, "once a Russian always a +Russian", was for once put aside in favor of the Jews. They were given +one right not enjoyed by other Russians, that of leaving Russia under +the obligation of abandoning Russian citizenship forever.[39] + + +II. ROUMANIA + +Up to very recent years, the history of the Jews in Roumania centers +about those resident in Moldavia. Its proximity to ancient Poland and +close association with Bessarabia, naturally made for a back-and-forth +movement of the Polish and Russian Jews, whose settlement was invited +by the boyars or landed nobility because of resulting industrial and +commercial advantages. + +The position of the Jews in Moldavia up to the middle of the +nineteenth century did not differ to any extent from that of their +brethren in Russia. Moldavia, as a Christian state, denied civil and +political rights to all non-Christians. The Jews in Moldavia were +regarded as aliens, whose activities were subject to special +regulation. The beginning of the last century witnessed the first +special Jewish laws. The Jews were forbidden to buy the products of +the soil, to acquire real property; non-resident Jews were debarred +unless they could prove an occupation and show the possession of +property. Definite restrictions as to occupation, residence in the +villages, the ownership, in villages, of houses, land, vineyards, +_etc._, existed. As vagabonds they could be expelled from the country +by administrative decree. Thus was their legal status fixed. + +The emancipation of Jews was first demanded by the liberal party +during the revolutionary days of 1848. But no practical change +resulted until the Convention of Paris in 1856, which, in granting +autonomy to the two provinces, guaranteed civil rights to all +Moldavians, regardless of creed. Though political rights were granted +only to Christian Moldo-Wallachians, the provision was made that, by +legislative arrangements, the enjoyment of political rights could be +extended to other creeds. Thus was established the possibility of a +gradual emancipation of the Jews, foreshadowed in the communal law of +1864, which granted the right of naturalization to certain classes of +native Roumanian Jews. Those who had passed through college or had a +recognized foreign degree, or who had founded a factory in the land +employing at least fifty workmen were among the favored classes. + +Shortly afterwards, this section was abrogated, and, with the +abdication of the liberal Couza and the accession of Charles +Hohenzollern, the present king, to the throne, the situation changed. +Article VII of the constitution of the newly-created kingdom read that +foreigners not of the Christian faith could not be naturalized. As +within the term foreigner the great mass of the Jews residing in the +land was included, this was a denial of the conditions laid down in +the Treaty of Paris. At the same time, old laws against the Jews which +had fallen into abeyance were revived, expulsions of the Jews from the +villages into the towns began to take place with great frequency, laws +requiring all sellers of liquor in rural communes to be naturalized +Roumanians deprived many Jewish families of a livelihood--in short, +the usual symptoms of anti-Jewish activity became the order of the +day. + +It was at the famous Berlin Congress, convened to decide questions +created by the Russo-Turkish war of 1877, that the subject of the +Jewish disabilities in Roumania was brought up, in connection with the +demand of Roumania for recognition as an independent state. The chief +objection made especially by the representatives of three of the +European powers--France, England and Germany--was Roumania's treatment +of the Jews. It was finally decided by the Congress to recognize her +independence on the condition that she grant civil and political +equality to all her citizens without distinction of race or creed. +This was expressed in Article 44 of the historic Berlin Treaty, which +read as follows: + + Article 44. In Roumania, difference in religious beliefs and + confessions shall not be brought against anyone as a ground for + exclusion or unfitness as regards the enjoyment of civil and + political rights, admission to public offices, functions, and + honors, or the exercise of various professions and industries in + any place whatever. Freedom in outward observance of all creeds + will be assured to all subjects of the Roumanian state, as well + as to strangers, and no obstacle will be raised either to the + ecclesiastical organization of different bodies, or to their + intercourse with their spiritual heads. + + The citizens of all states, whether merchants or others, shall + be dealt with, in Roumania, without distinction of religion, on + the basis of perfect equality. + +In the _constituante_ which was convoked soon after to discuss the +question of giving the Jews equal political rights, an interesting +picture is obtained of the sentiment of the upper and middle classes +of Roumania.[40] An overwhelming majority was opposed to the granting +of political rights to the Jews on the ground that Roumania was a +Christian-Latin State, or on the purely nationalistic ground that the +Jews were an alien and utterly unassimilable element of the +population. To meet the demands of the Powers the principle of +individual naturalization was adopted, by which an alien could be +granted naturalization individually and only by a special vote of the +Chamber of Deputies. Other onerous conditions, such as the +requirement of a ten years' residence in the country for citizenship, +and the prohibition of the purchase by aliens of rural estates, showed +conclusively that Roumania was prepared to give only formal assent to +the demand of the Powers.[41] After a year of negotiations, the three +Powers agreed to the recognition of her independence, expressing the +hope that the Roumanian government would recognize the inadequacy of +the revised article and especially of the principle of individual +naturalization as meeting the conditions of the Berlin Treaty, and +would aim towards a complete emancipation of all her subjects.[42] + +The situation at the beginning of the eighties presented but little +hope of improvement in the political condition of the Jews. Eight +hundred and eighty-three Jews who had fought in the war for +independence had been naturalized _en masse_. With the exception of +this small number, the Jews were legally classed as foreigners.[43] +Shortly after, owing to the fact that Austria-Hungary had withdrawn +its protection from several thousands of its Jewish citizens resident +in Roumania, the entire body of Jews received a new legal status, that +of "foreigners not subject to any foreign Power". In other words, they +were stateless, though subject to all the obligations of Roumanian +citizens, including military service and the payment of taxes. This +legal status of the Jews has received the attention of the world and +marks a condition of things which according to Bluntschli is "a denial +of the entire development of European states".[44] + +Freed from the control of the Powers, Roumania now entered on a new +campaign of discrimination against the Jews. The first decade of the +eighties saw this begun in a series of laws which for completeness +finds no parallel even in Russia. At the very beginning, a law giving +the police the right of domiciliary visitation and of expelling under +the vagabond law anyone in the rural districts, was employed against +the Jews, resulting in their frequent expulsions into the towns. The +enforcement of the law against rural residence was so strict as to +create practically the same situation as exists in the Russian Pale. +The law of 1883, prohibiting lotteries, and in the following year the +law prohibiting hawking or any form of sale from house to house or on +the streets deprived several thousands of Jewish families of their +livelihood. + +It was in 1886 and 1887, however, when the laws which were to create a +national industry and commerce were introduced, that a serious step +was taken to exclude the Jews from economic activity. On the +assumption that occupations were a civil right to which aliens could +or could not be admitted, the Jews were systematically deprived even +of the civil rights which had been theirs, to a great extent, before +the Berlin Congress sought to make them politically free. As +foreigners, the Jews were prohibited the right of choosing electors +for the newly-created Chambers of Commerce and Trade, or of becoming +members of these chambers although they formed a large majority of the +merchants and manufacturers represented in these important bodies. A +still more serious provision was that which decreed that five years +after the foundation of a factory two-thirds of the workingmen +employed therein must be Roumanians. Jews were also partly excluded +from the administrative positions in joint-stock companies. They were +completely excluded from employment in the financial institutions of +the state, from the state railway service, and, by a provision that +two-thirds of the employes on private railways must be Roumanians, +were practically excluded from these as well. The sharpest blow, +however, was struck in 1902, when a new law for the organization of +trades, popularly known as the Artisans' Bill, was passed. In this law +there is to be seen a revival of the guild organizations of the Middle +Ages. To pursue his occupation every artisan was required to obtain a +certificate from a guild. Jewish master artisans and workmen were hit +by the requirement that aliens in order to have the right of working +in accordance with this law must prove that in their own country +reciprocal rights existed for Roumanians, or obtain an authorization +from a Chamber of Commerce or Industry. Whatever value this +requirement may have had for the protection of Roumanian workmen in +foreign countries, its chief effect was to place in a position of +economic helplessness the majority of the Jewish workmen as "aliens +not subject to any foreign Power", and largely unable to secure +authorization from such chambers controlled by competitors. Other +clauses, requiring that all workingmen belong to a guild, and that +fifty workmen possessing civil and political rights are empowered to +form a guild, put the control of trades into the hands of non-Jews, +although the majority of the artisans in many of the trades were Jews. + +A similar policy was pursued with reference to the cultural activities +of the Jews. A circular of the minister of public instruction, issued +in 1887, ordered that preference should be given to Roumanian +children, in cases where there was not enough room in the elementary +schools for all. This began the gradual exclusion of Jewish children +from the Roumanian elementary schools. The formal treatment of the +Jews as aliens in the educational system was introduced in 1893, when +all aliens were required to pay fees for entrance into the public +schools, and were admitted only in case there was enough room for +them. The effect of these laws was seen in the diminished proportion +of Jewish children in the elementary schools. Similar provisions for +the secondary and high schools and universities largely closed the +doors of these institutions to the Jews. From schools of agriculture +and forestry, and of commerce they were completely excluded. + +To the educational restrictions were added restrictions to +professional service. As aliens, they were forbidden to be employed in +the public sanitary service and health department as physicians, +pharmacists, _etc._, from owning as well as working in private +pharmacies, and from entering other professional fields. + +The almost complete agreement of the two principal parties--liberal +and conservative--explains the thoroughness and uninterrupted progress +of this process of piling up disability upon disability. The +explanation is partly to be found in the constitution of Roumania, the +electoral law of which places the political powers in the hands of two +classes--the landed aristocracy and the urban, or middle class. The +vast majority of the peasants are excluded by educational and property +qualifications, obtaining only indirect representation. Had the Jews +been granted political rights, they would have shared political power +with the other two classes. It is through the second electoral +college, of both the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, that the +middle class is represented politically. As manufacturers and +merchants, as urban dwellers, as members of the liberal professions +and as graduates of the elementary schools, the Jews would have become +the most important part of this electoral college. + +Again, the creation of an industry and commerce along national lines +was largely a course of action in the interests of this middle class +of Roumanian merchants, artisans and laborers. It was in favor of this +class that the laws were passed debarring Jews from various +occupations and seeking essentially to wrest the industrial and +commercial monopoly from their hands. + +In this course of action, powerful aid was extended by the +bureaucracy, recruited mainly from the lower nobility and the middle +classes. Depending for their support upon the urbans, and seeking to +prevent the entrance of Jews into state service, which would have +resulted from the granting of political rights to the Jews, the +bureaucracy have acted in harmony with the middle classes in the +attempt to make the Jews politically, economically, and culturally +powerless. + +Thus the situation that the Jews in Roumania have been facing for +thirty years is abnormal, from every standpoint. At no time within +thirty years has there been any serious question of giving to the Jews +the political rights, the granting of which had been made the +condition of the recognition of Roumania's independence by the Powers. +The history of the succeeding thirty years has been one of gradual, +steady and systematic deprivation of one civil right after another. To +the prohibition of freedom of movement has been added that of work; +one occupation after another has been prohibited to Jews under the +mask of foreigners. From all the branches of state service Jews have +been almost completely debarred. Participation in important private +and public enterprises has similarly been limited. The schools have +been largely closed to them. The effect has been partly registered in +a rate of illiteracy higher in the cities among the Jewish children +between seven and fifteen than among the non-Jewish children of the +same age. + +Thus the conscious policy of Roumania has been that of oppression, +political, economic and social, with the deliberate aim of making it +impossible for the Jews to live in Roumania. This method of indirect +expulsion is the essence of her policy of thirty years. As such it was +recognized and openly stated in the only formal protest against her +manner of fulfilling the conditions of the Berlin Treaty, made by the +United States, through its Secretary of State, John Hay, whose +circular to the Powers signatory to the Treaty demanded that Roumania +be called to account for her treatment of the Jews, and her dishonesty +in violating the pledges given by her to the Powers.[45] + + +III. AUSTRIA-HUNGARY + +Until the middle of the nineteenth century, the legal position of the +Jews in Austria-Hungary differed from that of their brethren in Russia +and Roumania only in degree. Prohibited the free exercise of their +religion, the right to hold real property, and to enter certain +occupations, and burdened by special Jewish taxes, the Jews remained a +class apart and governed in all their activities by special laws. +Their legal emancipation, begun in 1848, was definitely established by +the promulgation in each division of the Empire of the Fundamental Law +of 1867, declaring that religion should not be a ground for +discrimination in civil and political rights. + +The civil and political equality of the Jews was a cardinal principle +of the creed of German-Austrian liberalism and one of a number of its +victories embodied in the Constitution of 1867. Austrian economic and +social life at this period was, however, too saturated with +medievalism to allow for a complete revolution in the attitude toward +the Jews. On the other hand, the influential part played by the Jews +in the liberal movement and the fact that a group of wealthy Jews +were powerful factors in the _haute finance_ and in the commercial +life of the country were made the basis of an attack by the +feudal-clericals upon the Jews. + +The great financial crash of 1873, in which several Jewish financial +houses were concerned, was the starting-point of political +antisemitism in Austria. The Jews were denounced as the +representatives of the capitalist order of society, with its +overwhelming concentration of wealth and its exploitation of the +industrial and the agricultural proletariat. The Christian-Socialist +movement began with antisemitism as the corner-stone of its economic +and social doctrines. Its opposition to the Jews and to capitalism was +largely due to medieval prejudices in favor of the Christian-feudal +state and the medieval industrial organization. In the early eighties +it began to triumph when the "small man" or petty industrialist +received political power through an extension of the suffrage. + +It reached its height in the nineties, when, under the combined +influence of feudal-clerical nobles, the clergy and the lower middle +class, a period of reaction set in. In Vienna, in 1895, the antisemite +Lueger was elected mayor. Powerless though they were to change the +legal status of the Jews, the antisemites succeeded in creating in +both upper and lower circles of Austrian society an atmosphere of +antagonism to the Jews which has prevented the complete fulfillment of +the principle of equality as set forth in the constitution. + +The clericals have fanned the flames of religious hatred especially +among the peasantry by ritual-murder accusations, which have been rife +and have played a large part in strengthening the sentiment of +hostility toward the Jews. + +In Galicia, the position of the Jews became unsettled, owing to a +variety of causes.[46] Although one of the least advanced among the +Austrian crown lands, Galicia has experienced within the last +half-century an industrial and commercial development along with the +rest of the Empire. This resulted in the growth of a middle class +particularly among the Poles, which began to compete for supremacy +with the Jews. The improvements in transportation and communication, +the organization of agricultural syndicates, for the purpose of +directly purchasing and selling the produce of the peasants, and the +creation of rural credit societies, helped considerably to displace +the Jewish middlemen and traders as well as the Jewish money-lenders, +who dealt largely with the peasantry. The movement to develop Galicia +industrially was fostered on national lines by these Polish +organizations, which carried on an extensive propaganda and +systematically organized economic boycotts against the Jews. "Do not +buy of Jews", "Do not patronize Jewish artisans", became familiar +cries in Galicia as in other parts of Austria. + +The process of wrestling the monopoly of industry, trade and commerce +from the Jews in favor of the Polish petty merchants and artisans was +considerably accelerated by the official bodies, the autonomous +Galician _Diet_ and the municipal boards, controlled chiefly by the +Polish-Catholic nobility, who saw in the national-industry movement a +means of capturing the votes of the middle class and of thus retaining +their position as leaders of the Polish people. Communal funds were +used to establish Poles in business. Attempts were made to take away +from the Jews the small-salt and tobacco trades. The taxes on the +taverns were increased. In the public financial institutions organized +for various purposes Jews were not given representation. In nearly all +the activities designed to promote the interest of the urban +population and the peasantry, the Jews were systematically excluded by +the local authorities. + +Added to this, the increasing distress of the Galician peasants has +reacted strongly upon the Jews, who depend so largely upon their +buying power. The poverty of the peasantry, the competition for the +control of the rural market created by public and private agencies, +added to the increasing competition in the towns from other sections +of the population, have all co-operated to create a great surplus, in +proportion to the population, of petty merchants and artisans among +the Jews. This had its effect in an over-competition from the side of +the Jews themselves. + +The Jews have suffered as well from their historical role of +intermediaries between a most avaricious nobility and a bitterly +exploited peasantry. Acting as stewards and as tavern keepers for the +Polish nobles, who are mainly absentee landlords, and who, until very +recently, enjoyed the right of keeping taverns as one of their feudal +privileges, the Jews have become the buffers of the deep-seated +antagonism between the two chief classes of Galicia. + +Agrarian uprisings have been frequent of late, particularly after the +failure of the crops, which here as in Russia and Roumania spells a +crisis. These, chiefly directed against the nobles, have frequently +been diverted toward the Jews, to whom the peasants are largely +indebted, and in whom they see the visible instruments of the +oppression of their lords. + +Economic antagonism has been intensified by the religious hatred which +has been fostered by the Polish clergy and which has been the basis of +numerous ritual-murder charges. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[34] Leroy-Beaulieu, _The Empire of the Tsars_ (New York, 1894), vol. +iii, p. 558. + +[35] For an example of typically medieval economic notions regarding +trade and commerce prevalent among the feudal classes of Eastern +Europe, _cf._ Carmen Sylva's criticism on the economic activities of +the Jews in Roumania in _Century_, March, 1906. + +[36] The part played by the authorities in these _pogroms_ is +discussed by A. Linden in _Die Judenpogromen_, vol. i, pp. 12-96. + +[37] President Harrison's Message is given in Appendix A, page 199. + +[38] Semenoff, _The Russian Government and the Jewish Massacres_ +(London, 1907), pp. 147-167. + +[39] Immigration Commission: _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, pp. +261-262. + +[40] The discussions are presented in _La question juive_. + +[41] Article VII is given in Appendix B, p. 200. + +[42] _Cf. English Parliamentary Papers_, 1880, vol. lxxix, +Correspondence relative to the recognition of Roumania. + +[43] In the following twenty years only 85 Jews were granted +citizenship. + +[44] Bluntschli's pamphlet is a valuable statement of the situation. +For title _cf._ Bibliography. + +[45] The Hay note is given in Appendix C, pp. 201-206. + +[46] _Juedische Statistik_, p. 208 et seq. + + + + +CHAPTER V + +CONCLUSION + + +An intimate connection has thus been established between the present +state of economic and social transition through which the countries of +Eastern Europe are passing and the situation which has confronted the +Jews in each of these countries and has profoundly influenced their +position and their history for the last third of a century. What the +forces are behind the emigration of the Jews from these countries to +Western Europe and the United States during this period now become +clear. + +The industrial and commercial development of the recent decades +brought about changes in themselves unfavorable to the economic +activities of the Jews. The improvements in communication and +transportation through the extension of railroads, the building of +roads, and the creation of credit facilities especially for the +peasantry served partly to displace the Jews, whose economic position +had been largely based upon the services they rendered in a relatively +backward industrial and commercial civilization. The rise of a middle +class among the Christian populations, chiefly engaged in industry, +added an element of competition not before present. Not the least +important in its effects was the increasing poverty of the peasantry, +which seriously affected the Jews, as the principal buyers of their +produce and sellers of finished products. Agricultural crises, so +frequent in recent years in Eastern Europe, have often involved the +Jews in financial ruin.[47] + +These purely economic factors served to weaken the position of the +Jews and to cause an over-concentration in trade and industry, to +their detriment. The gradual readjustment that would have followed +naturally was, however, prevented by the existence of other forces, in +the action of which we find the key to the situation faced by the Jews +and the impelling forces of Jewish emigration. + +One of these was the economic antisemitism that rose partly from the +competition of the middle classes of both populations. This +competitive jealousy awakened racial and religious prejudices and +found particularly in Galicia an active expression in the organization +of economic boycotts, and in the co-operative agencies that were +created to foster the growth of the Christian artisans and merchants. +The sufferings of the agricultural population, again, were charged to +the Jews, with whom the peasants were in close business relations and +to whom they were deeply indebted. Preached from platform, press and +pulpit, the doctrine of Jewish exploitation of the peasantry found a +ready acceptance among all classes. + +Economic and social hostility was furthered by the feudal ruling +classes whose antagonism to the Jews was deep-seated and many-sided. +As these formed the ruling economic, social and political power in +Eastern Europe, they were the chief instrument in creating a situation +that was full of danger for the Jews. In the politico-economic +struggles between these privileged classes and the liberal middle +classes that accompanied the transition, the Jews were found, +consciously or unconsciously, on the side of the liberals, who sought +to introduce the economic, social and political conditions of modern +civilization. Thus they served as a convenient object of attack. In +Russia, where, since the reaction, the control of the feudal classes +over the government was complete, the new laws restricting residence, +movement, occupations and economic activity in general, checked the +economic growth of the Jews and put them at a great disadvantage in +the struggle for existence. This situation was created to an even +greater degree in Roumania, where the economic interests of the +Roumanian middle class were furthered at the expense of the Jews. +Economic helplessness was essentially the condition created for the +Jews, so narrow was the margin left for the exercise of their powers. +The social pressure that was added, through laws limiting the entrance +of Jews to the educational institutions and the liberal professions, +seeking to limit their cultural influence, was part and parcel of the +same policy. In the case of Russia, repression reached the form of +massacres of Jews, when these were found politically useful. + +Governmental oppression was thus the chief force in unsettling the +economic and social position of the Jews. Throughout the course of +thirty years the leading motive of the Russian and Roumanian +governments was the reduction, through every possible means, of the +number of their Jewish populations. + +This governmental pressure which began to be applied at the beginning +of the eighties became equivalent in the course of time to an +expulsive force. The only outlet to the intolerable conditions that +had been created by the forces of governmental repression and +oppression was emigration. This was sensed by the Jews at the very +beginning of the period. How eagerly it has been seized upon the +following pages will show. It is enough for the moment to point out +that the vast and steadily increasing stream of Russian Jewish +immigrants to the United States alone, has risen to such proportions +that its average for the past decade has approached the estimated +annual increase of the Jews in Russia. In other words, emigration has +begun to mean the decline, not only relatively, but even absolutely, +of the Jewish population in Russia. + +The fact that the persecution of the Jews in the case of Russia and +Roumania amounts to a force of rejection has been widely recognized +during the course of the emigration of the Jews from Eastern Europe. +In England, where the number of Jewish immigrants increased rapidly, +it found expression in the official reports, and in the United States, +it became a subject of direct diplomatic correspondence in the formal +protest to Russia in 1891 by President Harrison, and in 1902 in the +circular note to the Powers by Secretary Hay, regarding Roumania's +treatment of the Jews. + +A still more significant recognition of the exceptional forces behind +the Jewish immigration was given by the Jews of Western Europe and the +United States, living in a state of freedom, security and comparative +wealth, to whom the oncoming of thousands of Jewish refugees at all +the critical periods, and the steady stream of Jewish immigrants at +other times has meant a taking-up of onerous burdens and a sharing of +the hardships of the situation thus suddenly thrust upon them. The +attempt to organize and regulate Jewish emigration from Eastern Europe +was a task early undertaken by the _Alliance Israelite Universelle_. +The Jewish Colonization Association was expressly founded by Baron de +Hirsch to open up, in various countries, new paths for the Jewish +emigrants. At all periods of exceptional emigration, national and +international committees met to consider the problems of the +immigrants thrown upon their responsibility. + +The vast majority of the emigrants made the United States their goal. +In their movement and their economic and social characteristics we +shall find a striking reflection of the impelling forces of their +emigration. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[47] _Cf. Hersch_, chap. v. He gives to this factor far more +importance than it deserves. For criticism of his method, _cf._ p. 92, +note I. + + + + +PART II + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES + +A. ITS MOVEMENT + + + + +CHAPTER I + +DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS + + +In a study of Jewish immigration to the United States the first +problem is to determine the number of Jews who entered this country +during the thirty years from 1881 to 1910, and their nationality, or +their countries of nativity. The determination of these figures meets +with the difficulty that prior to 1899, immigrants were classified in +the official statistics by country of nativity or residence, and not +by race or nationality. Thus the figures regarding Jewish immigration +are obtainable from official sources only from 1899. Those relating to +previous years have to be sought for elsewhere. + +The main sources that have been used to obtain the figures before 1899 +are the reports of three Jewish societies which were concerned with +the care of the Jewish immigrants arriving at the principal ports of +New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore. These were the United Hebrew +Charities, of New York; the Association for the Protection of Jewish +Immigrants, of Philadelphia; and the Hebrew Benevolent Society, of +Baltimore. Each of these maintained an agent who, besides his other +duties, collected statistical information concerning the sex, age, +country of nativity, occupation, destination, etc., of the Jewish +immigrants, partly from the ships' manifests and partly through +personal inquiry. The statistical information thus obtained was +regularly included in the annual reports of these societies. These +records were begun by the New York and Philadelphia societies, in +1884, and by the Baltimore society, in 1891. + +As the yearly statistical tables of these reports were made to +correspond with the annual meeting of these societies,[48] it was +found advisable to rearrange them from July to June, in order to have +them correspond with the fiscal year, and thus allow for a proper +comparison with the official data furnished by the immigration +authorities. + +As rearranged, the tables presented the number of Jewish immigrants +entering the ports of New York and Philadelphia from July 1, 1886, to +June 30, 1898, and the number of Jewish immigrants entering the port +of Baltimore from July 1, 1891, to June 30, 1898.[49] As these three +ports were, up to recent years, the places of entry of all but a very +small number of Jewish immigrants, the figures thus obtained represent +practically the total Jewish immigration to the United States from +1886 to 1898. + +To ascertain the nationality or country of nativity of the Jewish +immigrants from 1886 to 1898, it was necessary to redistribute in +accordance with the fiscal year the monthly arrivals found in the +tables of the United Hebrew Charities, which contain the figures for +each nationality.[50] As the reports of the Philadelphia society gave +only the totals of arrivals of each nationality for each year but not +distributed by months, the following method was employed. The +percentage the immigration of each nativity constituted of the total +immigration from November to October (the society's year) was used as +the basis for calculating the annual immigration of each nativity +from July to June.[51] There being no essential difference between +Baltimore and Philadelphia, so far as Jewish immigrants of each +nationality are concerned, the same percentages were used as for +Philadelphia.[52] + +The discrepancy between the official figures of the total immigration +from Roumania from 1886 to 1898 and those of the Jewish societies for +the Jewish immigrants from Roumania for the same period is worthy of +note. In each of four years the number of Jewish immigrants from +Roumania as reported by the Jewish societies exceeded the total +immigration from Roumania as reported in the official statistics. For +two years, 1892 and 1893, the official statistics do not report any +immigrants from Roumania, whereas the Jewish societies report,[53] +respectively, 740 and 555 Jewish immigrants from Roumania, which +represented a normal number from this country, as the other years +indicate.[54] + +The total number of immigrants of each nationality arriving from July +1, 1886, to June 30, 1898, was thus obtained. The total number of +Jewish immigrants arriving from Russia, Austria-Hungary and Roumania, +at each of the principal ports, for each year from 1886 to 1898, are +summarized in table V.[55] + +The figures of Jewish immigration before 1886 were not obtainable +either from the official or the Jewish sources, there being only an +estimate of the number of the Jewish immigrants from 1881 to 1884 in +the _American Jewish Year Book_ of 1899-1900 (as 74,310), and in the +_Jewish Encyclopedia_ (as 62,022), without any indications as to how +these were obtained. To secure a fairly accurate statement, the +proportion the Russian Jewish immigration from 1886 to 1898 bore to +the total Russian immigration was used as the basis for calculating +the total number of Russian Jewish immigrants from 1881 to 1885.[56] +This was distributed yearly according to the proportion of each year's +contribution to the five years' total. By a similar calculation the +number of Jewish immigrants from Austria-Hungary was obtained.[57] For +Roumania, the proportion of Jews being more than ninety per cent, and +at this period practically the entire Roumanian immigration being +Jewish, the figures were taken _in toto_. The results for each year +added together constituted the total Jewish immigration for the year. + +The general tendency among writers on the subject of Jewish +immigration has been to exaggerate the magnitude of this movement. In +a discussion in the _Jewish Encyclopedia_ regarding the dimensions of +the Jewish immigration before 1899, exact figures were given that are +on their face erroneous.[58] The inaccuracy of these figures is +explained by the fact that the writer committed a gross error in +making his table. The total Russian immigration to the United States +from 1880 to 1898 was designated as the Jewish immigration from +Russia, though it should have been evident that the number of other +peoples coming from Russia and included in these figures must have +been very large. Another column gave as Jewish immigrants coming from +countries other than Russia, the totals of the Jewish immigrants +entering the United States from 1885 to 1898, as reported in the +_American Jewish Year Book_ of 1899 (the latter figures of which +included Russian Jews as well as those of other nativities), thereby +doubling the number of Russian Jewish immigrants for this period. The +result has been to more than triple the numbers of the Jewish +immigrants. These figures have been widely used and quoted, and have +generally created the impression of a Jewish immigration larger by +several hundred thousands than is really the case.[59] + +The results of the foregoing are summarized in Table VI, which gives +the number of Jewish immigrants arriving in each of the thirty years +from 1881 to 1910, and the principal countries of nativity of these +immigrants. We are thus in a position closely to study the movement of +Jewish immigration for practically the entire period since it became a +significant part of the recent immigration to the United States, and +thereby to throw light upon the character of this movement, in itself +and as a part of the general immigration. + +TABLE VI + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES, 1881 TO 1910 + + Year Austria- United + Russia Hungary Roumania Kingdom Germany + 1881 3125 2537 30 -- -- + 1882 10489 2648 65 -- -- + 1883 6144 2510 77 -- -- + 1884 7867 3340 238 -- -- + 1885 10648 3938 803 -- 1473 + 1886 14092 5326 518 -- 983 + 1887 23103 6898 2063 -- 780 + 1888 20216 5985 1653 -- 727 + 1889 18338 4998 1058 -- 758 + 1890 20981 6439 462 -- 633 + 1891 43457 5890 854 -- 636 + 1892 64253 8643 740 -- 1787 + 1893 25161 6363 555 -- 1814 + 1894 20747 5916 616 -- 1109 + 1895 16727 6047 518 -- 1028 + 1896 20168 9831 744 -- 829 + 1897 13063 5672 516 -- 586 + 1898 14949 7367 720 -- 296 + 1899 24275 11071 1343 174 405 + 1900 37011 16920 6183 133 337 + 1901 37660 13006 6827 110 272 + 1902 37846 12848 6589 55 182 + 1903 47689 18759 8562 420 477 + 1904 77544 20211 6446 817 669 + 1905 92388 17352 3854 14299 734 + 1906 125234 14884 3872 6113 979 + 1907 114937 18885 3605 7032 734 + 1908 71978 15293 4455 6260 869 + 1909 39150 8431 1390 3385 652 + 1910 59824 13142 1701 4098 705 + ---------------------------------------------------------------- + Total 1119059 281150 67057 42896 20454 + + Year Brit. All + N.A. Turkey France Others Total + 1881 -- -- -- -- 5692 + 1882 -- -- -- -- 13202 + 1883 -- -- -- -- 8731 + 1884 -- -- -- -- 11445 + 1885 -- -- -- -- 16862 + 1886 -- -- -- 254 21173 + 1887 -- -- -- 200 33044 + 1888 -- -- -- 300 28881 + 1889 -- -- -- 200 25352 + 1890 -- -- -- 124 28639 + 1891 -- -- -- 561 51398 + 1892 -- -- -- 950 76373 + 1893 -- -- -- 429 35322 + 1894 -- -- -- 791 29179 + 1895 -- -- -- 871 26191 + 1896 -- -- -- 276 32848 + 1897 -- -- -- 535 20372 + 1898 -- -- -- 322 23654 + 1899 5 81 9 52 37415 + 1900 -- 114 17 49 60764 + 1901 -- 154 20 49 58098 + 1902 -- 138 9 21 57688 + 1903 -- 211 11 74 76203 + 1904 8 313 32 196 106236 + 1905 11 173 327 772 129910 + 1906 429 461 479 1297 153748 + 1907 1818 918 306 952 149182 + 1908 2393 635 425 1079 103387* + 1909 2780 690 325 748 57551* + 1910 2262 1388 339 801 84260* + ----------------------------------------------------------- + Total 9706 5276 2299 14903 1562800 + + * From 1908 immigrants were classified in the reports of the + Commissioner-General of Immigration as "immigrant aliens," those + intending to reside permanently in the United States and + "non-immigrant aliens," those making a temporary trip to the + United States. In the figures of 1908, 1909 and 1910, only the + "immigrant aliens" are considered. + +TABLE VII + +PERCENTAGE OF ANNUAL JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES +CONTRIBUTED BY EACH COUNTRY OF NATIVITY, 1881 TO 1910 + + Austria- United + Year Russia Hungary Roumania Kingdom Germany + 1881 54.8 44.7 0.5 -- -- + 1882 79.5 20.1 0.4 -- -- + 1883 70.4 28.7 0.9 -- -- + 1884 68.7 29.2 2.1 -- -- + 1885 63.1 23.4 4.8 -- 8.7 + 1886 66.6 25.2 2.4 -- 4.6 + 1887 69.9 20.8 6.3 -- 2.4 + 1888 70.0 20.7 5.7 -- 2.5 + 1889 72.3 19.7 4.2 -- 3.0 + 1890 73.3 22.5 1.6 -- 2.2 + 1891 84.6 11.5 1.6 -- 1.2 + 1892 84.1 11.3 1.1 -- 2.2 + 1893 71.2 18.0 1.6 -- 5.1 + 1894 71.1 20.3 2.1 -- 3.8 + 1895 63.9 23.1 2.0 -- 3.9 + 1896 61.4 29.9 2.3 -- 2.5 + 1897 64.1 27.9 2.5 -- 2.9 + 1898 63.2 31.1 3.0 -- 1.3 + 1899 64.9 29.5 3.6 .5 1.1 + 1900 60.9 27.8 10.2 .2 .6 + 1901 64.8 22.4 11.8 .2 .5 + 1902 65.6 22.3 11.4 .1 .3 + 1903 62.6 24.6 11.2 .6 .6 + 1904 73.0 19.0 6.1 .8 .6 + 1905 71.1 13.4 3.0 11.0 .6 + 1906 81.5 9.7 2.5 4.0 .6 + 1907 77.1 12.7 2.4 4.7 .5 + 1908 69.6 14.8 4.3 6.1 .8 + 1909 68.0 14.7 2.4 5.9 1.2 + 1910 71.1 15.6 2.0 4.9 .8 + -------------------------------------------------------- + Total 71.6 17.9 4.3 2.8 1.3 + + Year Brit. All + N.A. Turkey France Others Total + 1881 -- -- -- -- 100.0 + 1882 -- -- -- -- 100.0 + 1883 -- -- -- -- 100.0 + 1884 -- -- -- -- 100.0 + 1885 -- -- -- -- 100.0 + 1886 -- -- -- 1.2 100.0 + 1887 -- -- -- .6 100.0 + 1888 -- -- -- 1.1 100.0 + 1889 -- -- -- .8 100.0 + 1890 -- -- -- .4 100.0 + 1891 -- -- -- 1.1 100.0 + 1892 -- -- -- 1.3 100.0 + 1893 -- -- -- 4.1 100.0 + 1894 -- -- -- 2.7 100.0 + 1895 -- -- -- 7.1 100.0 + 1896 -- -- -- 3.9 100.0 + 1897 -- -- -- 2.6 100.0 + 1898 -- -- -- 1.4 100.0 + 1899 -- -- -- .4 100.0 + 1900 -- -- -- .3 100.0 + 1901 -- .2 -- .1 100.0 + 1902 -- .2 -- .1 100.0 + 1903 -- .3 -- .1 100.0 + 1904 -- .3 -- .2 100.0 + 1905 -- .1 .2 .6 100.0 + 1906 .3 .3 .3 .8 100.0 + 1907 1.2 .6 .2 .6 100.0 + 1908 2.3 .6 .4 1.1 100.0 + 1909 4.7 1.2 .6 1.3 100.0 + 1910 2.7 1.6 .4 .9 100.0 + ------------------------------------------------------ + Total 0.6 0.3 0.2 1.0 100.0 + +FOOTNOTES: + +[48] The year of the United Hebrew Charities is from October to +September, that of the Philadelphia society is from November to +October, that of the Baltimore society is from July to June. + +[49] _Cf._ table II, p. 159. The figures for Baltimore were furnished +by the Baron de Hirsch Fund. + +[50] For an example of this distribution _cf._ table III, p. 159. + +[51] _Cf._ table IVA, p. 160. Thus, from November 1885 to October 1886 +there entered the port of Philadelphia 2165 Jews, of whom 1624 or 75 +per cent were from Russia, 260 or 12 per cent were from +Austria-Hungary, 43 or 2 per cent were from Roumania, and 238 or 11 +per cent were from all other countries. From July 1, 1885 to June 30, +1886, there entered the port of Philadelphia 1625 Jews. To ascertain +the numbers of each nationality for this fiscal year, we may use the +percentages given above for each nationality. Calculating these, we +find that in the fiscal year 1886 of the 1625 Jews entering the port +of Philadelphia, 1218 were from Russia, 196 were from Austria-Hungary, +33 were from Roumania, and 178 were from all other countries. In like +manner, the numbers of each nationality for the other years were +obtained. + +[52] _Cf._ table IVB, p. 160. + +[53] As corrected by the methods described. + +[54] For the four years mentioned, the figures are as follows, those +reported by the Jewish societies preceding those from official +sources: in 1886, 518, 494; in 1887, 2063, 2045; in 1888, 1653, 1188; +in 1889, 1058, 893. For the official figures _cf._ Immigration +Commission: _Statistical Review of Immigration_, pp. 40-44. + +[55] _Cf._ table V, p. 161. + +[56] Out of a total of 505,078 Russian immigrants from 1886 to 1898, +the Russian Jewish immigrants constituted 315,355, or 62 per cent. + +[57] In calculating the number of Jewish immigrants from +Austria-Hungary the percentage the Jewish immigration was of the total +immigration from Austria-Hungary from 1886 to 1910 and not, as in the +case with the Jewish immigration from Russia, from 1886 to 1898, was +used through an oversight as the basis for calculation. As the +immigration of Jews from Austria-Hungary for 1885 at the port of New +York alone constituted 14 per cent of the total immigration from +Austria-Hungary, this figure was put down _in toto_, being a higher +number than the one obtained by calculation. As the Jewish immigration +from 1886 to 1910 constituted 9 per cent of the total immigration from +Austria-Hungary and the immigration from 1886 to 1898 constituted 14 +per cent of the total immigration, the difference is not large. +Following is the table indicating the difference for each year from +1881 to 1884. + + Year. Total Jewish immigration. Difference. + immigration. at 14 at 9 + per cent per cent + 1881 27935 3882 2537 1345 + 1882 29150 4051 2648 1403 + 1883 27625 3840 2510 1330 + 1884 36571 5083 3340 1743 + +The increased numbers from the higher percentage involve no change in +the relative position of Jewish immigration from the three principal +countries of emigration, except in 1881, when the Jewish immigration +from Austria-Hungary would have exceeded that from Russia. + +[58] _Jewish Encyclopedia_: "Migration," vol. viii, p. 584. _Ibid._, +"Russia"--Emigration, vol. x, p. 547. + +[59] Ruppin uses these figures in _Die Sozialen Verhaeltnisse der Juden +in Russland_, p. 11. + +Hersch, (_Le juif errant d'aujourd'hui_), subjects the figures given +in the _Jewish Encyclopedia_ to a thorough analysis and shows their +absurdity. Unaware, however, of the nature of the error committed by +the writer and of the existence of authoritative sources for the +figures of Jewish immigration, he drew the conclusion that it is +impossible to obtain any really accurate figures of Jewish immigration +before 1899. This leads him into serious errors owing to the fact that +he discusses the movement of Jewish immigration from the basis of the +twelve years from 1899 to 1910, representing the height of the +movement, instead of for the entire period of thirty years. This +vitiates his principal conclusions regarding the character of the +Jewish movement to this country. Particularly noticeable is his +neglect of the phenomena presented by the Russian and Roumanian +movements and his elevation of the movement from Austria-Hungary as +the type of Jewish immigration to this country. + + + + +CHAPTER II + +IMMIGRATION OF JEWS FROM EASTERN EUROPE + + +In the thirty years between 1881 and 1910, 1,562,800 Jews entered the +United States. An examination of Tables VI and VII reveals the fact +that the great majority of the immigrants came from Russia, +Austria-Hungary and Roumania. Of the total number, Russia contributed +1,119,059 immigrants, or 71.6 percent; Austria-Hungary 281,150 +immigrants, or 17.9 per cent, and Roumania 67,057 immigrants, or 4.3 +per cent. Together these three countries contributed 93.8 per cent of +the total for the thirty years. The great majority of the Jewish +immigrants from the United Kingdom and British North America are not +English or Canadian Jews but transmigrants or transient East-European +Jews, to whom England and Canada were a halfway house from the +countries of Eastern Europe to the United States.[60] If we included +these immigrants, the Jewish immigration from these three countries of +Eastern Europe would be considerably above 95 per cent. The Jewish +immigration of the last third of a century is thus practically wholly +from Eastern Europe. + +Summarizing the results for the three decades,[61] we find that the +Jewish immigrants from Russia maintained a fairly constant proportion +to the total Jewish immigration, contributing 135,003, in the decade +between 1881 and 1890 or 69.9 per cent of the total for the decade, +279,811 or 71.1 per cent in the decade between 1891 and 1900, and +704,245, or 72.1 per cent, in the decade between 1901 and 1910. + +Roumanian Jewish immigration was relatively smaller in the earlier +decades, numbering 6,967 in the first, 12,789 in the second decade, +comprising 3.2 per cent and 3.6 per cent, respectively, of the total, +and in the last decade, numbering 47,301 and constituting 4.8 per cent +of the total immigration of the decade. + +The Jewish immigration from Austria-Hungary bore a proportion to the +total higher in the first two decades, contributing 44,619 immigrants +in the first decade and 83,720 immigrants in the second decade, or +23.1 per cent and 21.3 per cent, respectively, of the total, and +152,810 immigrants, or 15.7 per cent, in the last decade. + +The Jewish immigrants from the United Kingdom and British North +America, which, in the first two decades constituting less than one +per cent of the total of each decade, were included in the rubric "all +others", rose in the last decade to 42,589, constituting 4.4 per cent, +and to 9,701, constituting one per cent, of the total of this decade. + +An examination of the yearly contributions made by the Jews of the +principal countries[62] shows that the immigrants from Russia formed +the majority of the immigrants for each year of the entire period, and +as a rule, did not deviate far from the general proportion established +for the thirty years. The greatest increases occurred during the years +of maximum Jewish immigration, in 1882, 1891, 1892 and 1906, when the +Russian Jewish immigrants constituted four-fifths or more of the total +for the year. + +The immigrants from Roumania showed higher percentages than their +average in 1887 and in 1888, and a remarkable increase of their +contribution from 1900 to 1903, in which years they constituted more +than a tenth of the total number of immigrants. + +The immigrants from Austria-Hungary formed, on the average, less than +one-fifth of the total, but varied considerably in their proportions. +In general, they maintained a rate higher than their average during +the earlier years of their movement. In the later years they showed a +relative decline, especially during the last decade, owing to the +greater relative increase of the Jewish immigration from Russia and +Roumania, though their absolute numbers increased greatly during this +period. Their highest ratios of contribution were made from 1883 to +1886 and from 1896 to 1900, the latter period marking their maximum +relative contributions. + +The influence of the Russian Jewish immigration is thus paramount. It +dominates and controls the entire movement, owing to its great +preponderance of numbers. To a closer consideration of its movement we +shall now turn. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[60] Landa, _The Alien Problem and its Remedy_, pp. 54-57. + +[61] _Cf._ table VIII, p. 162. + +[62] _Cf._ tables VI and VII, pp. 93-94. + + + + +CHAPTER III + +IMMIGRATION OF JEWS FROM RUSSIA + + +The mass-movement of the Russian Jews to the United States began in +the first year of Alexander III's reign. Though in this year the +number of Russian Jews entering this country amounted to a little over +three thousand, the immigration grew so rapidly and in such +proportions that at the end of thirty years, more than a million +Russian Jews had been admitted to the United States. + +An examination of the figures of the Russian Jewish immigration for +the thirty years[63] reveals that it is a movement of steady growth. +The Russian Jewish immigration falls practically into two periods; the +first culminating in 1892, the second culminating in 1906. Considering +it by decades,[64] we find that the movement is one of geometrical +progression. In the first decade, from 1881 to 1890, 135,003 Russian +Jews entered the country, 12.1 per cent of the total Russian Jewish +immigrants. Between 1891 and 1900, 279,811 Russian Jews entered, +constituting 25.0 per cent of the total. In the last decade, from 1901 +to 1910, there entered 704,245 Russian Jews, or 62.9 per cent of the +total. + +The annual variations are, nevertheless, considerable and largely +explainable by the special conditions in Russia that have influenced +the lives of the Jews throughout this period. At the beginning of this +period, in 1881, the immigration of Russian Jews was small. The +_pogroms_ of 1881-2 were reflected in the sudden rise in 1882 to +10,489 immigrants, more than three times the number of the preceding +year. The immigration of this year was rather a flight than a normal +movement. The great majority of the immigrants were refugees, fleeing +from massacre and pillage.[65] + +In this year Russian Jewish immigration began its upward course. +Another high point was reached in 1887 with 23,103 immigrants, when +the educational restrictions and the expulsions that followed a strict +application of the May Laws indicated a renewal of the policy of the +Russian government. + +The rumors of new restrictions that marked the beginning of the +nineties, and the opening of the second decade of Alexander III's +reign, were followed by the wholesale expulsions from Moscow. The +immigration in 1891 of 43,457 and in 1892 of 64,253 Russian Jews--the +latter the highest number reached in two decades--reflects this +situation. Nearly a tenth of the total immigration entered in these +two years. + +The direct effect of the administrative activity of this year and +especially of the Moscow expulsions upon the Russian Jewish +immigration is seen in the number of Russian Jews who entered New York +during the months closely following these expulsions.[66] For the +first five months of 1891, the immigration averaged approximately +2,300, evidently a normal figure for this decade. It reached its +lowest in May, when 1,225 Jews entered the country. In June, two +months after the order of expulsion, the number of immigrants jumped +to 8,667--a six-fold increase--which up to this year was the largest +number of Russian Jews entering this country in one month. This +figure was surpassed in the immigration of August and September. Out +of a total of 60,261 Russian Jews who entered in 1891, 11,449 came the +first five months from January to May, and 40,706, or more than three +times the previous immigration, came the next five months from June to +October. The following five months there came only 16,832, less than +half the number of immigrants of the months of June to October. And, +finally, taking the year as a whole, there came over 60,261 Russian +Jews in 1891, the year of the Moscow expulsions, as compared with the +28,834 Russian Jews who entered in 1892, when no exceptional +circumstances occurred to affect their immigration tendency. + +The six years from 1893 to 1898 were relatively mild years for the +Russian Jews. The change of rulers in Russia and the comparatively +lenient attitude shown by Nicholas II toward the Jews in the beginning +of his reign resulted in a less stringent administration of the +special Jewish laws. The financial depression in the United States +which began in 1893 and embraced this period, was an additional +influence in diminishing the flow of Russian Jewish immigrants. The +fall, however, was not as large as the existence of unfavorable +economic conditions in this country might lead one to expect. For in +spite of it, Russian Jewish immigration resumed the rate it maintained +in the years before 1891. From 1893 to 1898 there entered this country +110,815 Russian Jews as against the 107,378 Russian Jews who entered +in the six years from 1885 to 1890. + +Another rise began in 1899. Economic depression, revolutionary +terrorism and anti-Jewish propaganda paved the way for a great +inpouring of Russian Jews to the United States. The Kishineff massacre +of 1903 sent thousands of Jews in veritable flight to the United +States, a fact which is reflected in an immigration of 77,544 Russian +Jews in 1904, the greatest number up to this year. With the beginning +of the Russo-Japanese war, the outbreak of the revolution and, above +all, of the Jewish massacres the immigration rose in 1905 to 92,388. +In 1906, a year of _pogroms_, it reached the number of 125,234, the +highest in the entire period--and in 1907, 114,932, the second largest +immigration. The diminution in the numbers in 1908 reflects largely +the relative change for the better that took place in the situation in +Russia, with the beginning of parliamentary government, as well as the +panic conditions in the United States of the preceding year. How great +still was the impulse to leave is shown by the fact that in spite of +the panic of 1907, the number of immigrants for 1908 was 71,978. The +great rise of the immigration from the United Kingdom during these +years was also due to the number of Russian Jews that came to the +United States by way of England. In all, during these five years which +form an epoch in contemporary Russian Jewish history, there streamed +into the United States half a million Russian Jews, constituting more +than two-fifths of the total immigration for the entire thirty years. + +Of special significance is the part the Jewish immigrants play in the +total Russian immigration to the United States.[67] By far the largest +group of immigrants coming from Russia are Jews. For the entire thirty +years they constituted 48.3 per cent of the total Russian immigration. + +As a general rule, the proportion of the Jewish in the total Russian +immigration rises during the critical periods of these thirty years. +Thus in 1891, the year of the Moscow expulsions, the Jewish immigrants +constituted 91.6 per cent of the total immigration from Russia, and in +the following year, under the same influences, 78.8 per cent. The +years 1886 and 1887 are also signalized by the great proportion of the +Jewish immigrants, who formed 79.2 per cent and 75.1 per cent, +respectively, of the total Russian immigration for these years. In the +last decade, when the Jewish participation in the total immigration +had become relatively lessened, the three years which represented the +climax of the movement, 1904, 1905 and 1906, show a higher relative +proportion, 53.4 per cent, 50 per cent and 58.1 per cent, +respectively, than the average for the decade or for the entire +period. + +Considering the proportions by decades,[68] we find that of the total +of 213,282 Russian immigrants entering in the decade from 1881 to +1890, the Jewish immigrants contributed 135,003, or 63.3 per cent. Of +a total of 505,280 Russian immigrants in the decade from 1891 to 1900, +the Jewish immigrants numbered 279,811, or 55.4 per cent. In the last +decade, from 1901 to 1910, of a total of 1,597,306 Russian immigrants, +the Jewish immigrants were 704,245, or 44.1 per cent. The diminishing +importance of the Jewish in the total Russian immigration, in spite of +the fact that the former shows so great an increase, is due to the +rapid growth of the immigration tendency among the other races in +Russia, especially in the last decade. + +Nevertheless, a closer examination of the relative participation by +the various peoples of Russia in the immigration from that country +from 1899 to 1910[69] shows that the Jews maintain their position of +predominance, contributing a larger proportion to the total Russian +immigration than any other people throughout this period, except in +1910, when the Poles contributed a slightly higher proportion to the +immigration of that year. The Polish contribution is next to that of +the Jews, attaining its maximum at a point where the Jewish +immigration is at its lowest, relatively, in the twelve years. + +The preceding sufficiently indicates the abnormal extent of the +Russian Jewish immigration but its intensity may be judged further +from the fact that though the Jews in Russia were less than +one-twentieth of the total Russian population, they formed nearly half +of the Russian immigrants to the United States. In other words, they +were represented in the Russian immigration by more than eleven times +their proportion in the Russian population. As, however, the +emigration movement of the Russians proper is directed chiefly to +Siberia, we may limit the comparison to the Pale, where the Jews are +overwhelmingly concentrated, and where they constitute more than a +tenth of the total population. Even with this limitation they were +represented in the immigration to the United States by more than four +times their proportion of the population. + +Another method of judging the degree of intensity of the Russian +Jewish movement is to compare the proportion the number of Jewish +immigrants for a period bears to the total Jewish population in +Russia--their rate of immigration--with that of the other Russian +peoples represented in the immigration to the United States. The rate +of immigration of the Jews is by far the highest among the peoples of +Russia. From 1899 to 1910 the Jewish immigrants to the United States +constituted on the average one out of every 79 of the Jewish +population in Russia.[70] The Finnish immigrants constituted one out +of every 191 Finns, the Polish immigrants one out of every 200 Poles, +and the Russian immigrants proper one out of every 11,552 of the +Russian population. The relative position of the Jews is thus +strikingly indicated. The rate of immigration truly becomes an index +of the economic and social pressure to which the Jews have been +subjected for a third of a century. This rate of immigration for the +Jews, moreover, shows large fluctuations in the twelve years from 1899 +to 1910.[71] Of every 10,000 Jews in Russia there came to this country +on the average for the twelve years from 1899 to 1910, 125 Jews. From +1899 to 1903 the annual rate of immigration was much lower than the +average. In 1904, with the beginning of the critical years, the annual +rate rose to 152, and in 1905, to 181. It reached its climax in 1906, +with 246, almost twice as large as the average for the entire period. +It fell slightly below this in 1907 with 226. In 1908, there was a +great fall to 141, though the rate was still above the average for the +period. + +The movement of the Russian Jews to this country in the last thirty +years is seen to be steadily rising and to reach enormous dimensions +in the last decade. The Jews are more largely represented in the +movement from Russia than any other people, and predominate +practically for the entire thirty years. The rate of immigration is +abnormally high, as compared with that of any other of the immigrant +races from Russia. For the most part the Russian Jewish immigration +reflects the unusual situation confronting the Jews in Russia. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[63] _Cf._ table IX, p. 162. + +[64] _Cf._ table X, p. 163. + +[65] Sulzberger, _The Beginnings of Russo-Jewish Immigration to +Philadelphia_ (Philadelphia, 1910), pp. 125-150. + +[66] _Cf._ table XI, p. 163. + +[67] _Cf._ table XII, p. 164. + +[68] _Cf._ table XIII, p. 164. + +[69] _Cf._ table XIV, p. 165. + +[70] _Cf._ table XV, p. 165. + +[71] _Cf._ table XVI, p. 166. + + + + +CHAPTER IV + +IMMIGRATION OF JEWS FROM ROUMANIA + + +The immigration of Roumanian Jews to the United States began as a +small stream at the end of the sixties, and assumed significant +dimensions in the eighties. Two important periods of rising +immigration are clearly distinguishable. The first period attains its +maximum between 1885 and 1889. The second attains its maximum and that +of the entire movement between 1900 and 1904. + +In the thirty years between 1881 and 1910, 67,057 immigrants entered +the United States.[72] In the first decade, 6,967 immigrants, or 10.4 +per cent of the total, arrived. In the second decade, 12,789 +immigrants arrived, or 19.1 per cent of the total. The great majority, +47,301 immigrants, or 70.5 per cent of the total, arrived in the last +decade, more than twice as many as had arrived in the two preceding +decades. The Roumanian Jews thus began to take a significant part in +the Jewish movement only within the last decade. + +The annual variations are closely connected with the conditions in +Roumania which have been previously discussed.[73] The rise in 1885 to +803 immigrants, the first number of any consequence, reflects the +measures taken in Roumania to restrict the economic activity of the +Jews, chiefly through the hawkers' law of 1884. The continuation of +the administrative activities against the Jews, the expulsion of many +from the villages, and particularly the beginning in earnest of the +attempt to drive them from industry and commerce, by the law of 1887, +are responsible for the wholesale exodus in that and the following two +years. In these three years more than 7 per cent of the total +Roumanian Jewish immigration entered the country. + +After 1889 and for nearly a decade the immigration of Jews from +Roumania subsided, resuming the proportions established before 1887. + +Another rise began in 1899. In 1900, the Roumanian Jewish immigration +reached the relatively great number of 6,183, around which point it +stood for the next two years. In 1903, it reached its maximum with an +immigration of 8,562 Jews, one-eighth of the entire Roumanian Jewish +immigration for the thirty years. In the following year the +immigration still held to the high numbers reached before 1903. The +years following 1904 show a fall to less than 4,000, which was +interrupted in 1908, when the immigration rose to 4,455. In 1909, a +sharp fall ensued to 1,390, and in 1910 to 1,701. + +The great rise from 1900 to 1904, during which period there came more +than half of the total number of Jewish immigrants from Roumania, was +largely due to the resumption of the government program against the +Jews. The chief form of restriction was the passing of the Artisans' +Law in 1902, preceded by some years of agitation and administrative +activity directed against the Jews, which aimed to make it impossible +for the Jewish artisans to secure work. The feeling that the Jews had +nothing to hope from the government, as much as the actual distress +occasioned, was largely responsible for the unprecedented +immigration.[74] + +The Jewish forms so large a part of the Roumanian immigration as to be +practically synonymous with it. As we have before noted, the figures +obtained from the Jewish sources indicate a larger immigration from +1886 to 1898 on the part of the Jews alone than the official figures +give for the entire immigration from Roumania for this period. +Confining our attention to the figures of immigration from 1899 to +1910,[75] we find that, from 1899 to 1910, of the 61,073 immigrants +from Roumania who entered the United States, 54,827, or 89.8 per cent, +were Jews. Thus practically nine-tenths of the immigrants from +Roumania are Jews. In the five years in which the Jewish movement was +at its height, the Jews constituted from 91 per cent to 95.7 per cent +of the Roumanian immigration. The immigration of other peoples from +Roumania is insignificant. The highest number entering in any of the +twelve years amounted to less than 800. + +Still more significant is the intensity of immigration of the +Roumanian Jews, especially in view of the negligible number of +immigrants from Roumania other than Jews. The rate of immigration of +the Roumanian Jews is far higher than that even of their Russian +brethren.[76] The average annual immigration of Roumanian Jews, for +the twelve years, from 1899 to 1910, amounted to 4,569, which +represented an average rate of immigration for the Roumanian Jews of +175 per 10,000 of the Jewish population in Roumania. In the five years +of maximum immigration, from 1900 to 1904, the rate was considerably +higher, reaching in 1903 the enormous proportion of 329 immigrants to +every 10,000 Jews in Roumania. The lowest rate during this period, +that of 1900, was only slightly smaller than the maximum rate +approached by the Jewish immigrants from Russia. However, in the three +years which represented the highest point of the rate of immigration +of the Jews from Russia, from 1905 to 1907, the rate of immigration +for the corresponding years in Roumania was considerably smaller. + +The Jewish immigration from Roumania is thus a product chiefly of the +last decade. The rise in the first decade and the relatively +tremendous rise in the last decade are a result largely of the +activities of the Roumanian government. The vast majority of the +immigrants from Roumania are Jews, whose rate of immigration is +unprecedented. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[72] _Cf._ table XVII, p. 166. + +[73] _Cf._ table XVIII, p. 167. + +[74] In the _Century_ of Nov., 1913, Professor Ross, writing on "The +Old World in the New," remarks (p. 28) that "the emigration of 50,000 +Roumanian Jews between January and August, 1900, was brought about by +steamship agents who created great excitement in Roumania by +distributing glowing circulars about America." + +It is remarkable that with so large an emigration of Roumanian Jews +during these eight months, ostensibly directed to America, only 6183 +Roumanian Jews were recorded as arriving in the United States in 1900, +and only 6,827 in 1901. In the twelve years from 1899 to 1910, +Professor Ross's figure is approached; for the entire period 54,827 +Roumanian Jews are officially recorded as entering the United States. + +Even of the relatively large immigration of Jews from Roumania in +1900, the cause clearly was not the activity of steamship agents. +Compare the report of the president of the United Hebrew Charities, +keenly alive to the problems presented to the American Jews by the +Jewish immigration: + +"The last few months have been noteworthy in the history of the Jewish +race for an outbreak of Anti-Semitism in a far-away country, the +far-reaching effects of which have been keenly felt in this city. I +refer of course, to the persecutions of the Jews in Roumania. A small +group of Jewish philanthropists of this city (under the direction of +the IOOB) has taken up the task of providing for the newcomers." Such +a response is not usually given to immigrants lured to this country by +promises of gain. + +_United Hebrew Charities of New York City_, Oct., 1900, p. 19. + +[75] _Cf._ table XIX, p. 168. + +[76] _Cf._ table XX, p. 168. + + + + +CHAPTER V + +IMMIGRATION OF JEWS FROM AUSTRIA-HUNGARY + + +The immigration of Jews from Austria-Hungary began before the eighties +of the last century, becoming at the beginning of the nineties a +relatively strong and steady current. Until recently, this immigration +was almost exclusively from Galicia.[77] + +Summarizing the movement by decades,[78] we find that 44,619 Jews, or +15.9 per cent of the total, came during the decade from 1881 to 1890; +83,720 immigrants, or 29.8 per cent of the total, came during the +decade from 1891 to 1900. In the last decade, from 1901 to 1910, there +entered 152,811 immigrants, or 54.3 per cent of the total. Thus there +is a nearly steady rise of the movement, though it is not as great as +that found in the Jewish immigration from Russia. + +The annual variations are also not as large as are found in the +Russian Jewish movement.[79] The greatest number that came in any year +in the first decade was in 1887, when 6,898 immigrants arrived, +contributing 2.4 per cent of the total for the year. The highest +number that came in the second decade was in 1899, when 11,071 +immigrants arrived, contributing 3.9 per cent of the total. From this +year there began a great rise which reached its maximum in 1904 with +an immigration of 20,211 Jews, constituting 7.2 per cent of the +total--the highest point attained in the entire movement. + +A comparison of the fluctuations of the Jewish with those of the total +Austro-Hungarian immigration shows that the former follows the general +movement quite closely, though there are minor differences and the +maximum periods of both movements do not coincide.[80] + +An examination of the part the Jewish played in the general +immigration from Austria-Hungary shows that during the entire period +of thirty years there entered into the United States from +Austria-Hungary 3,091,692 immigrants, to which the Jews contributed +281,150 immigrants, or 9.1 per cent.[81] That the Jewish movement was +relatively stronger in the earlier period than the general movement +from Austria-Hungary is indicated by the fact that the Jews +participate to a much larger extent in the movement of the first +decades than in that of the last. In the first decade, from 1881 to +1890, of the 353,719 immigrants from Austria-Hungary, the Jews were +44,619, or 12.6 per cent of the total for the decade. In the decade +from 1891 to 1900, of the 592,707 immigrants they were 83,720, or 14.1 +per cent of the total. In the last decade, of 2,145,266 immigrants, +they were 158,811, or 7.4 per cent of the entire movement. The Jewish +movement is thus seen to be relatively the strongest in the second +decade. Its fall in the last decade to almost half the proportion of +the preceding decade was due to the tremendous growth in the +immigration of the other races from Austria-Hungary. Whereas the +general movement nearly quadrupled its numbers in the last decade, the +Jewish movement did not quite double its numbers. + +The largest part in the movement from Austria-Hungary was taken by +the Jews during the earlier years.[82] The highest point was reached +in 1886, when the Jews constituted 18.6 per cent of the total +movement. In the following year the Jewish immigrants constituted 17.1 +per cent. Other years in which the Jews participated strongly were +1895, and from 1897 to 1899. In 1898 the second highest point was +reached, the Jews constituting 18.5 per cent of the movement. From +1904 a great fall ensued. The lowest point was reached in 1909, when +the Jews constituted only 5 per cent of the total movement. + +A clearer idea of the situation would be obtained if the figures for +the years and decades could be ascertained for Austria and Hungary +separately, as the Jews in each of the divisions of the Dual Monarchy +differ considerably in their immigration tendency. Austria and Hungary +are distinguished in the immigration statistics only since 1910. +Nevertheless, the three years from 1910 to 1912 serve to show that the +Jews from Austria immigrate to the United States in much larger +numbers than their brethren in Hungary. From 1910 to 1912, out of a +total of 36,684 Jewish immigrants from Austria-Hungary, 29,340, or +fully four-fifths, came from Austria. The participation of the +Austrian Jews in the general movement is also correspondingly larger. +From 1910 to 1912, the Jewish immigrants from Austria numbered 29,340 +out of a total of 303,776, constituting 9.7 per cent of the total +Austrian immigration. For the same period the Jewish immigrants from +Hungary numbered only 7,344 out of a total of 292,900, constituting +2.5 per cent of the total. Thus the Jews participate in the movement +from Austria practically four times as much as in the movement from +Hungary. + +The relative position of the Jews among the peoples immigrating from +Austria is of interest in this connection. The peoples with which +comparison must be maintained are those concentrated in Galicia, the +chief source of the Jewish, Polish and Ruthenian immigration.[83] For +the seven years between 1899 and 1905, the Jewish immigrants +constituted the second largest group. From 1906, they fell into the +third position (excepting in 1908), owing to the rapid increase of +immigration among the Ruthenians. + +The average rate of immigration of the Jews of Austria-Hungary for the +twelve-year period from 1899 to 1910, is 74 for every 10,000 Jews in +the Empire.[84] The maximum rate was 97, which was reached in the +immigration of 1904. In comparison with the Russian and Roumanian +Jewish immigrants, those from Austria-Hungary have a far lower rate of +immigration. This is true for the average as well as for the single +years. However, in the first two years, 1899 and 1900, the rate of +immigration was higher among the Jewish immigrants from +Austria-Hungary. In comparison with the rate of immigration of the +Poles and the Ruthenians, the Jews occupy an intermediate position, +having a lower rate than the Poles and a higher rate than the +Ruthenians.[85] + +The Jewish movement from Austria-Hungary thus shows a fairly steady +rise, but neither in its yearly variations nor its rate of immigration +does it give evidence of any exceptional characteristics. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[77] Buzek, "Das Auswanderungsproblem in Oesterreich," _Zeitschrift +fuer Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung_, p. 458. + +[78] _Cf._ table XXI, p. 169. + +[79] _Cf._ table XXII, p. 169. + +[80] _Cf._ table XXIII, p. 170. + +[81] _Cf._ table XXIV, p. 170. + +[82] _Cf._ table XXIV, p. 170. + +[83] _Cf._ table XXV, p. 171. + +[84] _Cf._ table XXVI, p. 171. + +[85] _Cf._ Hersch, _op. cit._, p. 43. This comparison gives a lower +rate of immigration to the Jews than they really possess, owing to the +fact that it is based upon the total Jewish population of +Austria-Hungary, and not upon that of Galicia, from which province the +great majority of the Jewish immigrants come. + + + + +CHAPTER VI + +TOTAL JEWISH IMMIGRATION + + +The movement of the total Jewish immigration for the thirty years +becomes clear in the light of the preceding pages. It is a rising +movement, divided into two parts, the first culminating in 1892 and the +second culminating in 1906. Like the Russian Jewish immigration which +underlies it, the movement is one of geometrical progression.[86] From +1881 to 1890, 193,021 Jewish immigrants entered this country, 12.3 per +cent of the total Jewish immigration. From 1891 to 1900, 393,516 Jewish +immigrants, or 25.2 per cent entered. In the last decade there entered +the enormous number of 976,263 Jewish immigrants, representing 62.5 per +cent of the total Jewish immigration for the thirty years. This was +more than twice as many as had entered the preceding decade, and more +than five times the number of those who had entered the first decade. +The Jewish immigration is in its largest part a product of the last +decade. + +The rise has not, however, been uniformly steady, as a division of the +entire period into five six-year periods shows.[87] In the period from +1893 to 1898, there was a fall in the Jewish immigration. This period +coincides with the years of depression in the United States following +the panic of 1893. The fall was chiefly due to that in the Russian +Jewish immigration. The Jewish immigration from Austria-Hungary on the +contrary showed a relative rise. For this period, as well as for a +few years before, the Roumanian Jewish immigration contributed smaller +numbers than in the previous decade. As in the case of the Russian +Jewish movement, if we compare the immigration of the six-year period +from 1885 to 1890, with that from 1893 to 1898, omitting the years +1891 and 1892 which are influenced in their great rise by the +exceptional circumstances occurring within these two years, we find +that the Jewish immigration was higher during the latter period of +depression in the United States than during the earlier period, the +total number of immigrants being 167,567 for the latter period, and +153,951 for the former. + +In the period from 1899 to 1904 there was a great rise. A quarter of +the entire immigration came in this period. The largest number of +immigrants--more than two-fifths of the total of thirty years--came in +the period from 1905 to 1910. If we included the immigration of 1904, +which properly belongs to the later movement, we find that half of the +entire Jewish immigration came within the seven years from 1904 to +1910. + +The yearly variations of the total Jewish immigration correspond +closely in the main to those of the Russian Jewish movement.[88] The +influence of the other movements is, however, felt, at times quite +strongly. Before 1885 the total Jewish immigration was quite small; +less than 10,000 (except in 1882) or less than 1 per cent of the +total, arrived each year. The rise of the immigration in 1882 to +13,202 was wholly due to the increase in the number of Russian Jewish +immigrants. The second half of this decade was marked by a rising tide +in the Jewish immigration from all the countries of Eastern Europe, +which reached a height in 1887, with an immigration of 33,044, +constituting more than 2 per cent of the total number. This was but a +prelude to the great rise at the opening of the second decade which in +1892 reached the number of 76,373 Jewish immigrants, the highest +number attained in the first two decades. The immigration for this +year alone constituted nearly one-twentieth of the total Jewish +immigration. The increase of these years is due solely to the increase +in the Russian Jewish immigration. From this point a fall ensued, +which lasted until 1899. The fall was strongest in the Russian and the +Roumanian movements. The absolute numbers and the relative proportions +in the Jewish movement from Austria-Hungary increased. The tremendous +rise of the last decade began in 1899. In 1900 the number of Jewish +arrivals rose to 60,764. This increase was general, though it reached +unusual proportions in the immigration from Roumania. + +The fall in the next two years was due to a decrease in the number of +immigrants from Austria-Hungary. That from Russia remained the same as +in 1900, and the Roumanian Jewish immigration maintained the high +level established in that year. + +The immigration of 1903 surpassed the great numbers attained in 1892. +The rise of nearly 20,000 of this year was general, though relatively +greatest in the Jewish immigrants from Austria-Hungary. + +The next three years marks the heights of the movement. In 1904, the +30,000 immigrants which represented the increase from the preceding +year were Russian Jews. This is equally true of the large increase of +1905. In this year a fall took place both in the Austrian and +Roumanian Jewish immigration. The Jewish immigration from the United +Kingdom rose tremendously from 817 of the preceding year to +14,299,[89] an increase which reflects the influences of the Russian +Jewish movement for this year, and indicates that this movement from +the United Kingdom must be considered as largely Russian Jewish. + +The year 1906 marked the high-water mark of Jewish immigration for +thirty years. 153,748 immigrants, practically one-tenth of the total +movement, came in this year. As in the preceding year, the increase in +the immigration from Russia (including the numbers from the United +Kingdom) was the basis of the increase in the total. + +From this point on we have a decline. The decline in 1907 to 149,182 +immigrants reflected the decline in the numbers of the Russian Jewish +immigrants, those from Austria-Hungary increasing. In this year the +number of immigrants from British North America became conspicuous. In +1908 the immigration fell to 103,387, reflecting almost wholly the +fall in the numbers of the Russian Jewish immigrants. The year 1909 +marked a tremendous decline of the Jewish immigration to 57,551 +immigrants. This decline was general, though relatively the greatest +in the Austro-Hungarian and the Roumanian immigration. + +A speedy recovery in numbers was shown in 1910 when the immigration +rose to 84,260, recurring to the numbers at the beginning of the +recent great rise, and higher than the immigration of any year before +1904. The rise was felt equally in the Russian and Austro-Hungarian +immigration, relatively little in the Roumanian. + +Thus by far the chief influence in the movement of the Jewish +immigration for these thirty years has been the Russian Jewish +immigration. In its growth of numbers, and in its rise and fall, the +total Jewish immigration of the last thirty years is a reflection of +the movement of the Russian Jews to this country. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[86] _Cf._ table XXVII, p. 172. + +[87] _Cf._ table XXVIII, p. 172. + +[88] _Cf._ table XXIX, p. 173. + +[89] _Cf._ table VI, p. 93. + + + + +CHAPTER VII + +PARTICIPATION OF JEWS IN TOTAL IMMIGRATION + + +We turn now to a consideration of the part played by the Jewish +immigration in the total immigration to this country for these thirty +years.[90] A general rise is revealed in the proportions the Jewish +bore to the total immigration. In the decade between 1881 and 1890, of +the 5,246,613 immigrants, the Jewish immigrants were 193,021, or 3.7 +per cent of the total. In the decade between 1891 and 1900, of the +3,687,564 immigrants, the Jewish immigrants numbered 393,516. The +Jewish proportion of the total rose to 10.7 per cent. This really +tremendous rise was due to the fact that while the total number of +immigrants fell off one-third in this decade, the Jewish immigrants +doubled their numbers. It is from this decade that the Jewish +immigrants become conspicuous in the immigration to the United States. +In the decade between 1901 and 1910, of the 8,795,386 immigrants, the +Jewish immigrants numbered 976,263. The proportion of the Jewish +immigrants to the total rose to 11.1 per cent. Even in this decade of +tremendous increase in the general immigration, the Jewish immigration +rose at a still greater rate. + +For the entire period the Jewish immigration was 8.8 per cent of the +total immigration.[91] This proportion was not reached before 1891. +The maximum in the first decade was in 1887, when the Jewish +immigration constituted 6.7 per cent of the total for the year. In +1891, this proportion rose to 9.2 per cent. It reached its highest +point during nineteen years, in 1892, when the Jewish immigrants +constituted 13.2 per cent of the total for the year. Throughout the +period of depression, from 1893 to 1898, the contribution of the +Jewish to the total immigration was, with two exceptions, above its +average for the thirty years. In 1893, when the number of Jewish +immigrants fell to half of that of the preceding year, its +contribution to the total was 8 per cent. In 1897, a year of lowest +Jewish as well as general immigration, its proportion was the same as +the average. In the following years the contribution of the Jewish +immigration rose proportionately, and in 1900 it reached the maximum +for thirty years, constituting 13.5 per cent of the total for the +year. The next highest proportion was reached in the year of maximum +Jewish immigration, 1906, when the Jewish immigrants represented 13.4 +per cent of the total for the year. Throughout the years from 1904 to +1908, the Jewish immigrants contributed above their average for the +period. In 1908, when the numbers both of the Jewish and the total +immigration had been greatly reduced, the Jewish immigrants +contributed 13.2 per cent of the total, one of the highest proportions +in the entire period, a fact which indicates that the Jewish immigrant +tide recedes more slowly than that of the total immigration. In 1909, +the year in which the effect of the panic of 1907 was registered in +the Jewish immigration, the proportion of the Jewish immigrants to the +total fell to 7.7 per cent. A slight relative rise took place in 1910 +to 8.1 per cent. + +A comparison of the annual fluctuations of the Jewish and the total +immigration enables us to distinguish some points of difference.[92] +Though, on the whole, the Jewish corresponds with the total +immigration in its rise and fall, there are significant differences. +Thus, 1882 represents a year of high immigration in each, but the rise +is in the case of the total immigration one of 17.9 per cent over that +of the preceding year, but in the case of the Jewish, it represents a +rise of 131.9 per cent over that of the preceding year, +proportionately more than seven times as great. Another period of +rising movement is in 1891 and 1892. Where, however, in 1891 the total +immigration rose 20.9 per cent, the Jewish rose 79.5 per cent. In +1892, the total rose 3.4 per cent, the Jewish rose 48.6 per cent. In +all these cases the difference is so great as to indicate the working +of special influences in the Jewish movement. + +The existence of these special influences is again evident in the last +decade. In 1904, the total immigration fell off 5.2 per cent, but the +Jewish immigration rose 39.4 per cent. In 1906, in spite of the great +total immigration of that year, and its increase of 7.2 per cent over +the preceding year, the increase of the Jewish was 18.2 per cent--more +than double that of the total. Again, the maximum periods of the two +movements do not coincide. The total immigration reached its highest +point for the thirty years in 1907. The maximum of the Jewish movement +was in 1906. + +The panic of 1907 also appears to have influenced the Jewish +immigration more slowly than the total. The greatest fall in the +latter took place in 1908, immediately after the panic. The greatest +fall of the Jewish immigration took place in 1909. This is another +indication of the slowness of the response of the Jewish immigration +to business conditions in this country, as compared with the rapid +response of the general body of immigrants. + +As the racial classification was introduced only in 1899, it is +impossible to determine for the entire thirty years the exact place +the Jews occupy in the movement of peoples from the Old World to the +New. During the twelve years from 1899 to 1910, there entered the +United States a total of 1,074,442 Jewish immigrants, an annual +average of nearly ninety thousand. This was the second largest body of +immigrants, constituting more than a tenth of the total immigration +for this period. In this regard the Jews were surpassed only by the +South Italians.[93] + +This is an immense volume of immigration, both relatively and +absolutely, and indicates to what an extent the immigration tendency +has seized the Jews. In this tendency, however, the Jews from the +different countries of Europe differ very strongly. As practically +only three countries of Eastern Europe--Russia, Roumania and +Austria-Hungary--are represented in the recent Jewish immigration, a +rate of immigration established for the Jews should be based upon the +population of these countries rather than upon the total Jewish +population in Europe. Thus established, the Jews have the highest rate +of immigration of any immigrant peoples. In 1906, during the maximum +period of Jewish immigration, the rate of immigration of the +East-European Jews was twenty out of every thousand. In 1907, the rate +of the Jewish immigration was nineteen out of every thousand. The Jews +are approached in this respect only by the Slovaks, who, in 1907, had +a rate of immigration of eighteen per thousand. In this respect, the +Jewish immigration is seen to occupy an exceptional position in the +recent movement of peoples from Europe to this country. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[90] _Cf._ table XXX, p. 174. + +[91] _Cf._ table XXXI, p. 174. + +[92] _Cf._ table XXXII, p. 175. + +[93] This average and the same relative position is maintained if we +take the fifteen years from 1899 to 1913, in which period there +entered 1,347,590 Jewish immigrants. + + + + +CHAPTER VIII + +SUMMARY + + +The preceding analysis of the movement of the Jewish immigration to +the United States and that of its Russian, Roumanian and +Austro-Hungarian tributaries, from 1881 to 1910, has revealed certain +facts of importance. + +The progressive nature of the Jewish movement has been disclosed. The +greatest numbers have come within the last decade. This is +particularly true of the movement from Roumania, and to a less extent +of the movement from Russia. On the other hand, a larger relative +proportion of the Jews from Austria-Hungary came during the first two +decades. Throughout, the Jews from Russia have predominated in the +total movement, governing its course for practically the entire +period. + +In the total movement from the three countries of Eastern Europe, the +Jews have participated most strongly in the Roumanian immigration, +constituting nine-tenths of this immigration. The Jews are nearly a +half of the immigrants from Russia. Their participation in the +immigration from Austria-Hungary is relatively much smaller, being +less than a tenth of the total immigration. In the immigration of the +two latter countries, the Jews show a lessening participation, due to +the great growth of the immigration of the other peoples. In the +movements from Russia and Roumania, the participation of the Jewish +immigrants rises greatly in all periods significant in the situation +of the Jews in these countries. The influence of the unusual +conditions facing the Jews in Russia and Roumania and of the +principal events in their history for these thirty years is reflected +in the annual fluctuations of the Jewish immigration of each of these +countries to the United States. The economic and social pressure +exerted upon the Jews in Russia and Roumania is reflected in the +degree emigration is utilized by them. The Jews from Russia have a +much higher rate of immigration than any other people immigrating from +Russia. The rate of immigration of the Jews from Roumania is the +highest among the Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe. In both +annual fluctuations and rate of immigration the movement of the Jews +from Austria-Hungary does not indicate the existence of special +influences. + +The participation of the Jews in the total immigration to the United +States is large and increasing in importance. For the last fifteen +years they formed the second largest body of immigrants. Their fate of +immigration is also higher than that of any other immigrant people. Of +note, too, is the slow response of their immigration to unfavorable +economic conditions in this country. When these facts are joined to +those which have shown the striking relative participation of the Jews +in the movements from Russia and Roumania, and the existence of +special causes operating in these countries and indicating their +influence in the yearly variations and in an extraordinary rate of +immigration, it becomes clear that for the largest part of this period +of thirty years Jewish immigration is controlled mainly by the +conditions and events affecting the fate of the Jews in the countries +of Eastern Europe. + +That the conditions in the United States exercise an influence, +favorable or unfavorable, upon the immigration of Jews is undoubted. +The influences, however, exerted by the conditions abroad are far +stronger and steadier, and, on the whole, override the latter. + +The conclusion previously reached that the Jewish immigration is for +the largest part the result of the expulsive and rejective forces of +governmental persecution is thus strengthened by this examination into +the situation as presented by the figures of the Jewish immigration to +the United States. With it as a guiding principle, some of the main +characteristics peculiar to the Jewish immigration are explained. To +these we now turn. + + + + +PART II + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES + +B. ITS CHARACTERISTICS + + + + +CHAPTER I + +FAMILY MOVEMENT + + +Vital aspects of an immigrant people are revealed in its sex and age +distribution. Generally speaking, whether an immigration is composed +of individuals or of families is shown in the relative proportion of +males and females, and of adults and children, of which it is +composed. + +That the Jewish movement is essentially a family movement is shown by +the great proportion of females and children found in it.[94] From +1899 to 1910, out of a total immigration of 1,074,442 Jews, 607,822, +or 56.6 per cent were males, and 466,620, or 43.4 per cent, were +females. These proportions have varied but slightly throughout the +period. The greatest departures were in the years 1904 and 1905. The +increase of the immigration of males in these years is explained by +the unusual conditions existing in Russia at this time--economic +unrest, revolution--which had the effect of sending over the men as an +_avantgarde_ to prepare the way for their families. Young men fleeing +to escape conscription also swelled the numbers. In 1906, however, the +number of males decreased by 2,000, but that of females increased by +more than 25,000. In this tremendous increase of females is registered +the effect of the _pogroms_ of 1905-6, in which years the movement +became a veritable flight. + +The general tendency has been towards an increase in the proportion of +females. For the thirteen years preceding, from 1886 to 1898,[95] out +of a total immigration at the port of New York of 251,623 Jewish +adults, 147,053, or 58.4 per cent, were males, and 104,570, or 41.6 +per cent, were females. The proportion of males is here somewhat +higher than that for the period from 1899 to 1910. The difference is, +however, relatively small. The tendency, previously noted, towards the +increase in the proportion of females is found here. The greater +relative diminution of the males in the later years--in 1894 reaching +the point where there were more females--is even striking. + +Turning to a consideration of the ages of the Jewish immigrants, we +learn that, between 1899 and 1910, 267,656, or practically one-fourth +of all the Jewish immigrants, were children under fourteen years.[96] +The large part that is taken in the Jewish immigration by the children +is apparent. + +Here, again, 1904 and 1905 represent periods of great increase in the +immigration of those between fourteen and forty-four years. As was the +case with the females, the proportion of children in the immigration +is at its greatest in the year 1906, by far the largest part of the +increase for this year being children, thus giving a significant +indication of the extent and literalness of the flight from Russia in +this year of _pogroms_.[97] In the thirteen years preceding, from 1886 +to 1898, of the 380,278 Jewish immigrants that entered the port of New +York for this period, 128,655, or 33.8 per cent, were children under +sixteen years of age.[98] A steady increase in the latter years is +noted in the proportion of children, which harmonizes with a similar +tendency noted of the females for the same period. + +That these facts reveal a family movement of considerable size, there +is no question. They become truly significant when comparison is made +with the proportions of the females and the children in the general +immigration and with those of the peoples of which it is composed. + +A comparison of the proportion of males and females in the total and +the Jewish immigration from 1899 to 1910 shows that for the entire +period the percentage of females in the Jewish was much higher than in +the total immigration, 43.4 per cent of the Jewish immigration being +females as compared with 30.5 per cent of the total.[99] The +percentage of females in the Jewish immigration was higher for every +year from 1899 to 1910. + +While the percentage of males in the total immigration was above 70 +per cent in five years, the percentage of males in the Jewish +immigration was less than 60 per cent in all but two years, 1904 and +1905, when it rose to 61.2 per cent and 63.2 per cent. The latter, +which represents the highest point in the percentage of males in the +Jewish immigration, was smaller than the percentage of males in the +total immigration for every year but 1899. In other words the maximum +percentage of males in the Jewish and the minimum percentage in the +total immigration practically coincide. + +In the period between 1899 and 1909 the proportion of children under +fourteen years of age in the Jewish immigration was 24.8 per cent, +while that in the total immigration was only 12.3 per cent.[100] The +Jewish thus had proportionately twice as many children as the total +immigration. + +The exceptional position of the Jews in regard to their family +movement is most strikingly shown when the composition of the Jewish +immigration by sex and age is compared with that of the other +immigrant peoples.[101] In a comparison with immigrant races which +contributed more than 100,000 to the total immigration from 1899 to +1910, the Jews are seen to have a higher proportion of females than +any other people except the Irish. The Irish present in this regard an +anomaly, in that they have more females than males in their +immigration. That it is not in the main a family movement is shown by +reference to the proportion of children under fourteen in the Irish +immigration, which is only 5 per cent, one of the lowest in the entire +series. The anomaly is easily explained by the well-known fact that +their females for the most part are single, who come to the United +States to work as servants.[102] + +Only one other people, the Bohemian and Moravian, approached the +Jewish in its high proportion of females. On the other hand, the one +people with a larger immigration than the Jewish, the South Italian, +presents a striking contrast to the Jewish immigration, in that its +proportion of females was about half that of the Jews. Although its +immigrants numbered twice as many as the Jewish, the females in the +Italian movement were only 408,965, as compared with 466,620 females +in the Jewish immigration. + +A comparison of the immigrant peoples with reference to their +composition by age shows that the Jewish movement contains without any +exception the largest proportion of children.[103] Out of a total of +990,182 Jewish immigrants from 1899 to 1909, 245,787, or 24.8 per +cent, were children under fourteen. In this regard, again, the +Bohemian and Moravian approach the Jewish, though not as closely as +in the proportion of females. The contrast with the South Italians +obtains here as well. As the Jewish immigration, during the twelve +years from 1899 to 1910, was the second highest in numbers, +contributing more than a million to the total, the number of females +and children found in its movement was higher than that of any other +immigrant race, not only relatively but absolutely as well. + +Most striking, indeed, is the contrast in these respects between the +Jewish immigrants and the other races coming from the countries of +Eastern Europe, particularly the Slavic immigrant races with whom the +Jews have been associated in the official statistics.[104] An +examination of the proportion of females in the immigration of the +eight races composing the Slavic group, shows that, with the exception +of the Bohemians and Moravians (whose movement presents strong +similarities to that of the Jews), the percentage of females was less +than a third of the total immigration of each race, the highest being +that of the Poles, which was 30.5 per cent. The contrast is even more +striking in respect to children under fourteen. Here, again, excluding +the Bohemians and Moravians, the highest percentage in the group was +that of the Poles, 9.5 per cent. In this respect, therefore, the +association of the Jewish immigrants with the other immigrants from +Eastern Europe, under the rubric "Slavic races", is seen to be +untenable. + +Strongest of all is the contrast between the Jewish immigration and +that of the Roumanian people.[105] The Roumanian movement is seen to +be composed practically wholly of individuals, only 9 per cent being +females, while that of the people from Roumania (nine-tenths of whom +are Jews[106]) is seen to have a proportion of females higher even +than that in the total Jewish immigration. Even greater is the +contrast with respect to age, only 2.2 per cent of the Roumanians +being children under fourteen. + +The division of the peoples represented in the immigration to the +United States into "old" and "new", the former consisting of the +peoples from Northern and Western Europe, the latter of the peoples +from Southern and Eastern Europe, is a convenient classification +essentially of two periods of immigration coinciding largely with +changes in the economic conditions in the United States. + +A comparison of the proportion of females and children in the "old" +and the "new" immigration with that in the Jewish shows that the +Jewish immigration has proportionately almost twice as many females as +the "new" immigration (Jews excepted), and surpasses even the "old" +immigration in this regard.[107] Of children under fourteen the Jewish +movement has proportionately more than two and one-half times as many +as the "new" immigration (Jews excepted), and nearly twice as many as +the "old" immigration. + +This analysis shows conclusively that the Jewish immigration is +essentially a family movement; that it is approached by no other +immigrant people in this regard; that it not only cannot be classed +with the "new" immigration, but shows a tendency towards family +movement far stronger than that of the peoples composing the "old" +immigration. + +The significance of this characteristic of the Jewish immigration is +obvious. Their unequaled family movement gives one of the clearest +indications that the Jewish immigrants are essentially composed of +permanent settlers. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[94] _Cf._ table XXXIII, p. 176. + +[95] _Cf._ table XXXIV, p. 176. + +[96] _Cf._ table XXXV, p. 177. + +[97] _Cf._ Hersch, _op. cit._, p. 76. + +[98] _Cf._ table XXXVI, p. 177. + +[99] _Cf._ table XXXVII, p. 178. + +[100] _Cf. Abstract of Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 14. See +Bibliography. + +[101] _Cf._ table XXXVIII, p. 179. + +[102] _Cf. Abstract of Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 15, for +the high proportion of servants among the Irish immigrants. + +[103] _Cf._ table XXXIX, p. 180. + +[104] _Cf._ table XL, p. 181. + +[105] _Cf._ table XLI, p. 181. The Roumanian immigrants come +principally from Austria-Hungary, and only slightly from Roumania. + +[106] _Cf. supra_, p. 131, note 2. + +[107] _Cf._ table XLII, p. 182. + + + + +CHAPTER II + +PERMANENT SETTLEMENT + + +Our studies of the sex and age distribution of the Jewish immigrants +have shown a family movement unsurpassed in degree. This in itself is +sufficient indication that the Jews are essentially permanent settlers +in this country and not transients, "who have no intention of +permanently changing their residence and whose only purpose in coming +to America is temporarily to take advantage of greater wages paid for +industrial labor in this country."[108] + +Equally convincing evidence is afforded by a survey of the facts +regarding the outward movement of Jews from this country.[109] The +figures of Jewish immigration are obtainable only from 1908, the law +of 1907 having required all steamship companies to furnish information +regarding their emigrant passengers. + +The relative stability of an immigration may be determined by +contrasting the departure of the aliens composing the immigration with +the arriving immigrants of this group for the same period. From 1908 +to 1912, 33,315 Jews left the United States--an average annual +emigration of 6,660 Jews. This is a strikingly low number, especially +when compared with the large Jewish immigration for the same period, +which numbered 417,016, and averaged annually 83,400 Jewish +immigrants. Thus, for every hundred Jews admitted, only eight Jews +left the country. This average proportion was largely exceeded only in +1909, not, however, because of any great increase in the absolute +numbers of the Jewish emigrants, but because of the great fall in the +number of Jewish immigrants of this year. + +The part that is taken by the Jewish emigrants in the total emigration +is insignificant and is in striking contrast with the great part taken +by the Jewish immigrants in the total immigration.[110] From 1908 to +1912, the Jewish immigrants constituted 9.7 per cent of the total +immigrants. In the same period, the Jewish emigrants constituted only +2.3 per cent of the total emigrants. Moreover, while the proportion +that the Jewish immigrants constituted of the total immigrants +exhibited a considerable and significant variation, fluctuating from +7.7 per cent to 13.2 per cent, the proportion the Jewish emigrants +constituted of the total emigrants remained around 2 per cent and +showed practically no variation. Relatively both to the number of +Jewish immigrants and of total emigrants, therefore, the number of the +Jewish emigrants is exceedingly small and practically negligible. + +How great the relative stability of the Jewish immigration is may be +seen when its return movement is compared with that of the total +immigration and of other peoples conspicuous in the immigration to the +United States.[111] Whereas, from 1908 to 1910, for every hundred +admitted in the total immigration, thirty-two departed--the outward +movement thus approximating one-third of the inward--in the case of +the Jewish immigration, only eight departed, an outward movement only +one-quarter as large, relatively, as the total. This was the smallest +outward movement, relatively to the inward, of any immigrant people, +except the Irish, whose outward movement was 6 per cent of the inward. +Relatively to the inward movement, the Jews had an outward movement +one-seventh as large as the South Italians, almost one-fourth as large +as the Poles, and less than one-half as large as the Germans. + +In the total immigration for these years, the Jews were the third +largest group with 236,100 immigrants, which constituted 10.2 per cent +of the total immigration. To the outward movement for this period, +however, they contributed 18,543 Jews, which constituted only 2.5 per +cent of the total number of emigrants, one of the smallest +contributions. The Poles, who constituted 11.7 per cent of the +immigration for the three years, contributed practically the same +proportion, 11.4 per cent, to the outward movement. Even more striking +is the contrast with the Italian movement. The Italians contributed +19.8 per cent of the inward movement for the period and 35.7 per cent +of the outward movement for the three years. Though their immigration +for these three years was only twice as large as that of the Jews, +their emigration was more than fourteen times that of the Jews. In +other words, no people combined in an equal degree as the Jews so +small a number of emigrants with so large a number of immigrants. + +It is interesting to determine what is the emigration tendency of the +Jews coming from Russia, Roumania and Austria-Hungary. This may be +gathered from the number of emigrants returned for each of these +countries, from 1908 to 1912, as compared with the number +admitted.[112] From 1908 to 1912, 294,813 Jews from Russia entered the +United States and 20,546 Jews departed for Russia; 11,246 Jews from +Roumania entered the United States and 546 Jews departed for Roumania; +60,408 Jews from Austria-Hungary entered the United States, and 8,513 +Jews departed for Austria-Hungary. In other words, for every hundred +Jews entering from Russia seven departed, for every hundred Jews +entering from Roumania five Jews departed, for every hundred Jews +entering from Austria-Hungary fourteen departed for their respective +countries. The emigration tendency was thus smaller with the Roumanian +and the Russian Jews than with the Austro-Hungarian Jews. This held +true for each of the five years. Relatively twice as many Jews from +Austria-Hungary as from Russia returned. The Roumanian Jews showed the +smallest tendency to return. + +Of importance is the question of the relative stability of the Jewish +movement from Russia and Austria-Hungary and that of their close +neighbors in these countries, the Poles, who contributed almost as +large a current of immigrants to the United States as the Jews, and +who, since they constitute the most important Slavic group, may be +taken as the type of the Slavic movement to this country. + +From 1908 to 1912, 265,964 Polish immigrants from Russia were admitted +to the United States and 60,290 Poles departed for Russia, this +constituting an average emigration of twenty-two per hundred +admitted.[113] As, for every hundred Russian Jews admitted in this +period, only seven departed, this constituted a relative emigration +one-third as large as that of the Poles. For the same period, 214,931 +Poles were admitted from Austria-Hungary and 88,994 Poles left for +that country, which constituted an average emigration of forty-one per +hundred admitted. The average emigration of the Jews from +Austria-Hungary was fourteen per hundred admitted or practically +one-third as large as that of the Poles. Thus, the Jewish immigrants +from Russia and Austria-Hungary present relatively three times as +stable a movement as the Polish immigrants from these countries. + +The fact that the Jewish emigration from Galicia was a movement of +families and was essentially a movement of permanent settlement in +their new home was noted by Buzek as characteristic of this emigration +even in the early eighties, and as strongly contrasted with the +emigration of the Poles from Galicia.[114] + +A comparison of the return movement of the "old" and the "new" +immigration with that of the Jewish immigration gives similar +results.[115] For every hundred admitted, there were, in the "new" +immigration, forty-two emigrants, relatively more than five times as +many as among the Jews. Even in the "old" immigration, which is +largely accepted as the type of permanent immigration, for every +hundred admitted, there were thirteen emigrants, about one and a half +times as many relatively as among the Jews. The Jewish immigration +must thus be accorded the place of distinction in American immigration +for permanence of settlement. + +An unusual test of this conclusion was afforded by the remarkable +emigration following the crisis of 1907.[116] The general opinion that +"the causes which retard emigration from abroad also accelerate the +exodus from the United States", was considerably strengthened by the +great exodus of 1908. To this rule the Jewish immigration forms, +again, a most striking exception. Although its number in 1907--149,182 +immigrants--was only slightly below its maximum for thirty years, and +constituted the second highest immigration for the year, only 7,702 +Jews left the country in 1908. This constituted only two per cent of +the total emigration for that year. Relatively to the number admitted +the Jewish emigration was, without exception, the lowest, being only +five departed for every hundred admitted. The remarkable disparity in +this regard with the Poles and the Italian was again shown here. For +every hundred Poles entering in 1907, thirty-three emigrated in 1908. +For every hundred South Italians entering in 1907, sixty emigrated in +1908. + +That the business conditions of this country affect Jewish immigration +is unquestioned, but the difference in the degree and the manner of +the response puts it in a class apart. A comparison of the total gain +in population in 1908 and 1909 in the immigration of Italians and Jews +shows that whereas in the Italian inward and outward movement in 1908 +there was a net loss to this country of 79,966, but in 1909 a net gain +of 94,806, in the Jewish inward and outward movement in 1908 there was +a net gain of 95,685, and in 1909 a net gain of 50,705.[117] The +Jewish immigration responds in its inward movement much more slowly +and less completely to the pressure of unfavorable conditions in this +country. In its outward movement it shows practically no response. + +The conclusion that the Jewish immigrants constitute to an unusual +degree a body of permanent settlers is strengthened by an examination +of the figures concerning immigrants who have been in the United +States previously.[118] Of the total from 1899 to 1910 of 9,220,066 +immigrants, 1,108,948, or 12 per cent, had been here before. Of the +1,074,442 Jews who entered the country during this period, only +22,914, or 2.1 per cent, had been previously in the United States. The +proportion of Jews who have been in this country before is by far the +lowest of any immigrant peoples. + +As the total Jewish exodus is insignificant as compared both with the +total emigration and the proportion of the Jewish immigration in the +total inward movement; as the Jewish outward movement shows +practically no response to unfavorable economic conditions in this +country, and as the Jewish inward movement presents the phenomenon of +a practically new body of immigrants, we are led to conclude that the +Jewish immigration exhibits a quality of permanence and stability to +so great a degree as to render this fact one of its distinguishing +characteristics. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[108] Immigration Commission: _Conclusions and Recommendations_, p. +16. + +[109] _Cf._ table XLIII, p. 182. + +[110] _Cf._ table XLIV, p. 183. + +[111] _Cf._ table XLV, p. 183. + +[112] _Cf._ table XLVI, p. 134. + +[113] _Cf._ table XLVII, p. 184. + +[114] Buzek, _op. cit._, p. 467. + +[115] _Cf._ table XLVIII, p. 185. + +[116] _Cf._ table XLIX, p. 185. + +[117] The number of Jewish emigrant aliens in 1908 was deducted from +the number of Jewish immigrant aliens: the combined number of Jewish +emigrant and non-emigrant aliens in 1909 was deducted from the +combined number of Jewish immigrant and non-immigrant aliens. _Cf._ +Fairchild, _Immigration_, 1913, p. 361. + +[118] _Cf._ table L, p. 186. + + + + +CHAPTER III + +OCCUPATIONS + + +The occupations of an immigrant people throw light upon their +industrial equipment and their probable future occupations in this +country. A study of the occupational distribution of the Jewish +immigrants from 1899 to 1910 will serve to illuminate some of the +characteristics of their movement.[119] + +The largest group is that classed as having "no occupation". This +group comprises 484,175 immigrants, and is 45.1 per cent of the total. +In the fact that it holds so large a place in the occupational +distribution, there is reflected the great number of women and +children among the Jewish immigrants. The rise in the proportion of +the "no occupation" group in the second half of the twelve years +follows a similar rise in the proportion of women and children in the +Jewish movement, which has been previously noted.[120] These are, in +the main, economically dependent, a fact which is of the highest +importance with reference to the character of this immigration, as +well as in its influence upon the economic and social problems facing +the immigrant Jews in their new home. + +Skilled laborers were the second largest group, numbering 395,823 +immigrants and comprising 36.8 per cent of the total. Next in order +was the group classed as "miscellaneous", with 186,989 immigrants, +representing 17.4 per cent of the total. This group included common +and farm laborers, servants, merchants and dealers, _etc._ In +professional occupations there were 7,455 immigrants, comprising 7 per +cent of the total. + +Omitting the "no occupation" group, and considering the 590,267 Jewish +immigrants reporting occupations, we find that of these the great +majority--67.1 per cent--were skilled laborers.[121] Laborers numbered +69,444 and comprised 11.8 per cent. Next in order of numbers were +servants, 65,532, who comprised 11.1 per cent. A much smaller group +was that composed of merchants and dealers (chiefly petty merchants, +hucksters, and peddlers), who numbered 31,491 and were 5.3 per cent of +the total. Of farm laborers there were 11,460, comprising 1.9 per +cent. The entire professional class comprised 1.3 per cent of the +total. There were 1,000 farmers, who comprised .2 per cent. + +In the professional classes the teachers were the largest group, +represented by 2,192, and comprising 29.4 per cent.[122] The next +class were the musicians, who numbered 1,624, comprising 21.8 per cent +of the total. Together these two groups were more than half of the +total. + +Thus, by far the most important occupational group was that of the +skilled laborers.[123] An examination of the distribution of this +group shows that they were represented in thirty-five trades. By far +the largest group of the skilled laborers were the tailors, numbering +145,272, and comprising 36.6 per cent. The dressmakers and +seamstresses numbered 39,482, and comprised one-tenth of the total. +Including the closely allied trades such as hat and cap makers, +milliners, _etc._, the garment workers composed practically one-half +of the entire body of skilled laborers. Second in rank were the +carpenters and joiners, who, together with the cabinet makers and +woodworkers (not specified) numbered 40,901, and comprised more than +one-tenth of the total. The fourth highest group were the shoemakers, +with 23,519, or 5.9 per cent of the total. Clerks and accountants, and +painters and glaziers contributed an almost equal number--the former +17,066, the latter 16,387--representing 4.3 per cent and 4.1 per cent +respectively of the total. Of butchers there were 11,413, or 2.9 per +cent, and of bakers 10,925, or 2.8 per cent. There were also 9,385 +locksmiths, or 2.4 per cent, and 8,517 blacksmiths, or 2.2 per cent. +Together, these ten groups comprised 318,104, or 80.4 per cent of the +Jews in skilled occupations. + +Another skilled occupation represented by more than 5,000 was tinners. +Trade groups of more than 3,000 were watch and clock makers, tobacco +workers, hat and cap makers, barbers and hairdressers, weavers and +spinners, tanners and curriers, furriers and fur workers, and +bookbinders. More than a thousand skilled laborers were found in the +following trades: photographers and upholsterers, mechanics (not +specified), masons, printers, saddlers and harness makers, milliners, +metal workers (other than iron, steel and tin), machinists, jewelers +and millers. Less than a thousand laborers were found in two groups: +iron and steel workers, and textile workers (not specified). + +The Jewish immigrants were therefore concentrated in the two groups of +"no occupation" and "skilled laborers", to which belonged more than +four-fifths of the total number. + +In the part taken by the Jewish immigrants in the occupational +distribution of the total immigrants from 1899 to 1909, these two +groups are prominent.[124] To the 1,247,674 skilled laborers, the +Jewish immigrants contributed 362,936, or 29.1 per cent. This was +more than twice the proportion of the Jewish immigrants in the total +number of immigrants. They were also represented in the "no +occupation" group by more than one and one-half times their proportion +of the total immigration, contributing to a total of 2,165,287 +immigrants, 445,728, or 20.6 per cent. In striking contrast with the +great contribution to these two classes is their insignificant +contributions to the groups of common laborers and farmers, and farm +laborers, to which they contributed respectively 2.9 per cent, 1.1 per +cent, and 0.1 per cent. + +It is, however, in comparison with the occupational grouping of the +other races that the peculiarities of the distribution of the Jewish +immigrants are most clearly seen.[125] An examination of the number of +those classed as having "no occupation" of each European immigrant +people and the percentage this group comprised of the total +immigration of each people, shows that the Jews have the highest +proportion, 45.1 per cent, of all immigrants belonging to this group. +The Bohemians and Moravians are next in order, with 39.5 per cent. The +absolute numbers of the Jews belonging to this group are also higher +than those of any other people. The Italians have only 440,274 +immigrants in the "no occupation" group, as compared with the 484,175 +Jewish immigrants in this group. Even more striking is the contrast +with the Poles, who have only 200,634 immigrants belonging to this +group. This corresponds closely with similar facts as to the relative +proportions of females and children found in the Jewish immigration +and among the other immigrant races. + +An even greater contrast exists in the proportions of skilled laborers +between the Jewish and the other immigrant peoples.[126] Of those +reporting occupations the Jews have, by far, the highest proportion of +those in skilled occupations. The nearest approach to their proportion +of skilled laborers is found among the Scotch, with 57.9 per cent. The +next in order are the English, with 48.7 per cent. A much smaller +proportion is found among the Bohemians and Moravians and the Germans. +All these races contribute not only much smaller proportions than the +Jews, but very much smaller absolute numbers to the total body of +skilled laborers. + +Of laborers (including farm laborers), the Jews, on the other hand, +have a smaller proportion, 13.7 per cent, than any people, except the +Scotch (who resemble the Jews most strongly in their high proportion +of skilled laborers and their low proportion of common laborers). + +The most striking contrast, in occupational distribution, however, is +presented with the Slavic peoples.[127] Of those reporting +occupations, the Slavic peoples, with the exception of the Bohemians +and Moravians, are seen to be overwhelmingly concentrated in the two +related groups of common and farm laborers, whereas the Jews are +mostly to be found in the group of skilled laborers. Relatively ten +times as many Jews as Poles, for instance, are in the skilled +occupations. + +That the Jews form a striking exception in their occupational grouping +is evident. A comparison of the occupational distribution of the "old" +and the "new" immigrants with that of the Jewish immigrants, from 1899 +to 1909, leads to the same conclusion.[128] The Jewish immigrants have +twice as many in the "no occupation" group as the "new" immigrants, +and a much higher percentage than the "old" immigrants. They have +relatively four times as many skilled laborers as the "new" +immigrants, and more than one and one-half times as many as the "old" +immigrants. Most remarkable is the fact that in spite of the +relatively great proportion of women among the Jewish immigrants, they +have a smaller proportion of servants than the "new" immigrants and +one-third as large a proportion as the "old" immigrants. This +indicates that the Jewish women are, as a rule, not servants, but +either do not engage in work, or, if they do, are employed in skilled +occupations. The latter group is, however, relatively inconspicuous. + +In professional occupations the Jews occupy an intermediate position +between the "old" and the "new" immigrants. In common and farm +laborers, the Jews have an exceedingly low proportion as compared with +the "old" and a strikingly low proportion as compared with the "new" +immigrants. + +Some distinctive traits in the occupational grouping of the Jewish +immigrants have become evident. They are apart from all the other +immigrant peoples in the great number of those having "no occupation". +In other words, the Jewish immigrants are burdened with a far greater +number of dependents than any other immigrant people, standing apart +in this respect from the peoples of the "old" immigration and to a far +greater extent from the peoples of the "new" immigration. Secondly, +the Jewish immigrants are distinguished by a far greater proportion of +skilled laborers. In this respect again they exceed even the peoples +of the "old" immigration. The fact that the skilled laborers are more +largely represented among the Jewish immigrants than they are in the +occupations of the Jews in the countries of Eastern Europe is +significant as showing an unusual pressure upon these classes abroad. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[119] _Cf._ table LI, p. 186. + +[120] _Cf. supra_, pp. 127-128. + +[121] _Cf._ table LII, p. 187. + +[122] _Cf._ table LIII, p. 187. + +[123] _Cf._ table LIV, p. 188. + +[124] _Cf._ table LV, p. 189. + +[125] _Cf._ table LVI, p. 189. + +[126] _Cf._ table LVII, p. 190. + +[127] _Cf._ table LVIII, p. 191. + +[128] _Cf._ table LIX, p. 191. + + + + +CHAPTER IV + +ILLITERACY + + +The rate of illiteracy has been generally used as a rough standard for +estimating the mental equipment of the immigrants. A consideration of +the rate of illiteracy among the Jewish immigrants dispels the popular +impression that practically every Jew is able to read and write.[129] +Out of a total of 806,786 Jews fourteen years of age and over who +entered this country from 1899 to 1910, 209,507 or 26 per cent, were +unable to read and write. As the average rate of illiteracy among all +the immigrants, from 1899 to 1910, was 26.7 per cent, the rate of +Jewish illiteracy is seen to be only slightly below the average. + +A number of considerations enter. One of these is the influence of +sex. It is generally recognized that, as a rule, females are more +usually unlettered than males. This difference of illiteracy between +the sexes is also more pronounced in countries where popular education +is less widely spread than in those where it is the rule. Such is the +case with the countries of Eastern Europe, which are the source of the +recent Jewish immigration. The contrast between male and female +illiteracy is strongest among the East-European Jews, who neglect the +education of their daughters as much as they strive to educate their +sons. This is reflected in the relative illiteracy of males and +females among the Jewish immigrants.[130] Of the 172,718 Jewish males +fourteen years of age and over entering this country from 1908 to +1912, 33,970, or 19.7 per cent, were illiterates. Of the 139,283 +females fourteen years of age and over, 51,303, or 36.8 per cent, were +illiterates. The illiteracy of Jewish females is thus almost twice as +high as that of Jewish males. As the proportion of females in the +Jewish immigration is so large, the influence of the sex factor in +increasing the rate of illiteracy among the Jewish immigrants is +considerable. A tendency from a lower to a higher rate of illiteracy +is discernible. The average rate for the first six years was 23.8 per +cent, that for the last six years was 27.2 per cent. This corresponds +with the increase in the latter years in the proportion of females in +the Jewish immigration, which has been previously noted. + +A comparison of the rate of illiteracy of the Jewish immigrants with +that of the other immigrant peoples shows that the Jews occupy an +intermediate position.[131] They have a relatively high rate of +illiteracy, as compared with the peoples from Northern and Western +Europe. In comparison with the Slavs, their rate of illiteracy is also +much higher than that of the Bohemians and Moravians, and, higher +also, though to a far less degree, than that of the Slovaks. + +The relative position of the Jews is clearly shown in a comparison of +their rate of illiteracy from 1899 to 1910 with that for the same +period of the "old" and the "new" immigration (from the latter of +which the Jews are excepted.)[132] The rate of illiteracy of the "old" +immigration is 2.5 per cent, that of the "new" immigration (Jews +excepted) is 37.2 per cent, that of the Jews is 25.7 per cent. The +Jews occupy a middle ground, yet near enough to the "new" immigration +to be classed with it in this respect. + +The conclusion reached in the first part that the educational standing +of the Jews is higher than that of the peoples in Eastern Europe among +whom they live is reflected in the greater relative literacy of their +immigrants.[133] The rate of illiteracy of the Jewish immigrants is +lower than that of the peoples among whom the Jews are found. In the +case of the Lithuanians and the Ruthenians the difference is +considerable. This is seen to hold true for each sex.[134] The +illiterates among the Jewish males constituted 21.9 per cent of the +total number of Jewish males. The illiterates among the Jewish females +constituted 40.0 per cent of the total number of Jewish females. In +both sexes, the proportion of illiterates was lower than that +prevailing among the other immigrant peoples. + +Here, again, the fact is noticeable of a wider difference in the case +of the Jews between the illiteracy of their males and females than +exists among any of the other peoples. Owing to the fact that the Jews +have in their immigration a notably higher proportion of females than +any of these peoples, the difference between their rate of illiteracy +and that of these peoples is lessened to some extent. + +That the illiteracy of the Jews is due chiefly to their exceptional +status in Russia and Roumania, our review of the conditions affecting +Jewish education in those countries has shown. No more striking +illustration exists of the fact that the literacy of the Jews is +conditioned by their freedom than the degree in which they are taking +advantage of the educational opportunities offered in this country, +remarkable testimony to which is presented in the reports of the +recent Immigration Commission. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[129] _Cf._ table LX, p. 192. + +[130] _Cf._ table LXI, p. 192. + +[131] _Cf._ table LXII, p. 193. + +[132] _Cf._ table LXIII, p. 194. + +[133] _Cf._ table LXIV, p. 194. + +[134] _Cf._ table LXV, p. 194. + + + + +CHAPTER V + +DESTINATION + + +The destination, or intended future residence, of immigrants is +influenced by certain considerations, such as the place of residence +of friends or relatives, the port arrived at, and the funds at the +disposal of the immigrants. + +The most important influence is that exercised by the occupations of +the immigrants. The preponderance of the industrially skilled and +commercial groups among the Jewish immigrants makes for residence in +the industrial and commercial centers. The great majority of the +Jewish immigrants arriving from 1899 to 1910 were destined for the +eastern states.[135] Of the total number of Jewish immigrants from +1889 to 1910, 923,549 immigrants, or 86 per cent, gave the North +Atlantic States as their destination and 110,998 immigrants, or 10.3 +per cent, the North Central States. Less than one-twentieth gave all +the other divisions as their destination. + +A great proportion of the Jewish immigrants, numbering 690,296, or +64.2 per cent of the total, gave New York as their destination.[136] +Pennsylvania was the destination of the next largest number of +immigrants, 108,534, constituting 10.1 per cent of the total. For +Massachusetts there were destined 66,023 immigrants, or 6.1 per cent +of the total. Four-fifths of the total number of immigrants were +destined for these three states. Other eastern states receiving a +large number of immigrants were New Jersey, for which 34,279 were +destined, and Connecticut, for which 16,254 immigrants were destined. +Of the North Central States, Illinois was the destination of the +largest number, 50,931 immigrants, constituting 4.7 per cent of the +total. Ohio was the destination of the next largest number, 20,531 +immigrants, or 1.9 per cent of the total. One state in the South +Central division, Maryland, was given as the destination of 18,700 +immigrants, constituting 1.7 per cent of the total, and the largest +number of those destined for this division. The tendency of the Jewish +immigrants towards industrial and commercial centers is here +reflected. + +The destination of the Jewish immigrants to the eastern states agrees +with that of the total immigration for the same period.[137] A larger +proportion of the Jewish immigrants than of the total immigrants was +destined for the North Atlantic States, which contain the commercial +and manufacturing centers. Less than one-half as many Jewish +immigrants as total immigrants were destined for the North Central +States. About an equal proportion of each was destined for the South +Atlantic States. A much smaller proportion of the Jewish than of the +total was destined for the Western States. In view of the industrial +equipment of the Jewish immigrants discussed previously, this tendency +is explained. + +The Jewish immigrants destined for the eastern states play a +correspondingly large part among the total number destined for these +states.[138] The Jewish immigrants destined for the North Atlantic +States were 14.5 per cent of all the immigrants destined for this +division. Their next highest proportion was of those destined for the +South Central States, of which they constituted 9.9 per cent. They +constituted an almost equal proportion of the immigrants destined for +the North Central and the South Central States, 5.2 per cent, and 5.0 +per cent, respectively. Of the immigrants destined for the Western +States they constituted only 1.2 per cent. + +The final destination of the immigrants very frequently is different +from the destination stated at the time of landing. An examination of +the disposition of Jewish immigrants landing at the port of New York +from 1886 to 1906 showed that a large part of the immigrants left +within a very short time for other parts.[139] Of the 918,388 +immigrants that landed at the port of New York, from 1886 to 1906, +669,453, or 72.9 per cent, remained in New York, and 248,935, or 27.1 +per cent, left for other points. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[135] _Cf._ table LXVI, p. 195. + +[136] _Cf._ table LXVII, p. 195. + +[137] _Cf._ table LXVIII, p. 196. + +[138] _Cf._ table LXIX, p. 196. + +[139] _Cf._ reports of the United Hebrew Charities of New York City, +1886 to 1906. + + + + +CHAPTER VI + +SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS + + +Some of the principal characteristics of the Jewish immigration to the +United States have been presented in the preceding pages. The Jewish +immigration has been shown to consist essentially of permanent +settlers. Its family movement is incomparable in degree, and contains +a larger relative proportion as well as absolute number of women and +children, than any other immigrant people. This in turn is reflected +in the greater relative proportion as well as absolute number of those +classified as having "no occupation". The element of dependency thus +predicated is another indication of the family composition of the +Jewish immigration. Its return movement is the smallest of any, as +compared both with its large immigration and the number of total +emigrants. The Jewish immigrants are distinguished as well by a larger +relative proportion and absolute number of skilled laborers, than any +other immigrant people. In these four primary characteristics the +Jewish immigrants stand apart from all the others. + +It is with the neighboring Slavic races emigrating from the countries +of Eastern Europe and with whom the Jewish immigrants are closely +associated that the contrasts, in all these respects, are strongest. +The Slavic immigrants are chiefly male adults. Their movement is +largely composed of transients, as evidenced by a relatively large +outward movement and emphasized by the fact that the vast majority of +them are unskilled laborers. An exception, in large measure, must be +made of the Bohemian and Moravian immigrants who present +characteristics strongly similar to those of the Jewish immigrants. + +The division into "old" and "new" immigration brings out even more +clearly the exceptional position of the Jews in regard to these +characteristics. Although the Jewish immigration has been +contemporaneous with the "new" immigration from Eastern and +Southeastern Europe, and is furthermore essentially East-European in +origin, its characteristics place it altogether with the "old" +immigration.[140] Most striking, however is the fact that in all of +these respects--family composition, and small return movement (both +indicating permanent settlement) and in the proportion of skilled +laborers--the Jewish immigration stands apart even from the "old" +immigration. + +Further confirmation may be obtained, in the study of the +characteristics of the Jewish immigration, of the principle +established in the preceding sections that the rejective forces of +governmental oppression are responsible for the largest part of this +immigration. The large family movement of the Jewish immigration is a +symptom of abnormal conditions and amounts almost to a reversal of the +normal immigration, in which single or married men without families +predominate. Even the family movement of the "old" immigrants may +largely be attributed to the longer residence of their peoples in the +United States as well as to their greater familiarity with the +conditions and customs of the United States. That so large a part of +the Jewish immigrants is composed of dependent females and children +creates a situation of economic disadvantage for the Jewish +immigrants, all the stronger because of their relative unfamiliarity +with the language or the conditions facing them in this country. + +Again, the Jews respond slowly and incompletely to the pressure of +unfavorable economic conditions in this country. This was emphasized +by the almost complete lack of response to the panic of 1907, as well +as expressed in the small, practically unchanging return movement of +the Jews to their European homes. + +The pressure upon the Jewish artisans, or skilled laborers, in Eastern +Europe is reflected in the predominance of this class among the Jewish +immigrants to this country. That so useful an element in Eastern +Europe with its still relatively backward industrial development--a +fact that was given express recognition by the permission accorded the +Jewish artisans in Alexander II's time to live in the interior of +Russia--should have been compelled to emigrate indicates that the +voyage across the Atlantic was easier for them than the trip into the +interior of Russia, access to which is still legally accorded to them. + +That the oppressive conditions created particularly in Russia and +Roumania and operating as a pressure equivalent to an expulsive force +does not explain the entire Jewish immigration to this country is +evident from the preceding pages. In a great measure, the immigration +of Jews from Austria-Hungary is an economic movement. The existence, +however, of a certain degree of pressure created by economic and +political antisemitism has however been recognized. The Jewish +movement from Austria-Hungary shares largely with the movement from +Russia and Roumania the social and economic characteristics of the +Jewish immigration which we have described. A strong family movement +and a relative permanence of settlement, especially as compared with +the Poles, and a movement of skilled laborers must be predicated of +the Jewish immigrants from Austria-Hungary, though undoubtedly not to +the same degree as in the case of the Jewish movements from Russia and +Roumania. + +It is also clear that the forces of economic attraction in the United +States do not play an altogether passive part in the Jewish +immigration. The very fact of an immigrant-nucleus formed in this +country and serving as a center of attraction to relatives and friends +abroad--a force which increases in direct and multiple proportion to +the growth of immigration--is an active and positive force in +strengthening the immigration current. This was early understood by +the _Alliance Israelite Universelle_ which had acted upon this +principle in the seventies and had prophetically sought to direct a +healthy movement of Jewish immigrants to this country in the hope of +thereby laying a foundation for future Jewish immigration to this +country. This current, however, once started and growing only by the +force of its increasing attraction, would reflect in its movement +almost wholly the economic conditions in this country. That so large a +part of the Jewish immigration, and so many of the phenomena peculiar +to it, find their explanation, for the largest part of the thirty +years, in the situation and the course of events in the countries of +Eastern Europe leads to the inevitable conclusion that the key to the +Jewish immigration is to be found not in the force of economic +attraction exercised in the United States but rather in the +exceptional economic, social and legal conditions in Eastern Europe +which have been created as a result of governmental persecution. + +Reviewing the various phases of the history of Jewish immigration for +these thirty years, we are enabled to see more closely its nature. The +study of the immigration, its movement and its social and economic +characteristics, in comparison with those of other immigrant peoples, +has revealed in it a number of distinguishing traits. In the causes of +the emigration of the Jews, in the pressure exerted upon their +movement as reflected in their rate of immigration, in their family +movement, in the permanence of their settlement, and in their +occupational distribution have been found characteristics which mark +them off from the rest of the immigrant peoples. The number of these +characteristics and the degree in which they are found in the Jewish +immigration, put it in a class by itself. + +The facts of governmental pressure amounting to an expulsive force, +and reflected in an extraordinary rate of immigration, in a movement +of families unsurpassed in the American immigration, the largest part +economically dependent, in an occupational grouping of skilled +artisans, able to earn their livelihood under normal conditions, and +in a permanence of settlement in this country incomparable in degree +and indicating that practically all who come stay--all these facts +lead irresistibly to the conclusion that in the Jewish movement we are +dealing, not with an immigration, but with a migration. What we are +witnessing to-day and for these thirty years, is a Jewish migration of +a kind and degree almost without a parallel in the history of the +Jewish people. When speaking of the beginnings of Russian Jewish +immigration to Philadelphia, David Sulzberger said: "In thirty years +the movement of Jews from Russia to the United States has almost +reached the dignity of the migration of a people," he used no literary +phrase. In view of the facts that have developed, this statement is +true without any qualification. + +This migration-process explains the remarkable growth of the Jewish +population in the United States, within a relatively short period of +time. In this transplantation, the spirit of social solidarity and +communal responsibility prevalent among the Jews has played a vital +part. + +The family rather than the individual thus becomes the unit for the +social life of the Jewish immigrant population in the United States. +In this respect the latter approaches more nearly the native American +population than does the foreign white or immigrant population. One of +the greatest evils incident to and characteristic of the general +immigration to this country is thereby minimized. + +Again, the concentration of the Jewish immigrants in certain trades +explains in great measure the peculiarities of the occupational and +the urban distribution of the Jews in the United States. The +development of the garment trades through Jewish agencies is largely +explained by the recruiting of the material for this development +through these laborers. + +These primary characteristics of the Jewish immigration of the last +thirty years will serve to explain some of the most important phases +of the economic and social life of the Jews in the United States, +three-fourths of whom are immigrants of this period. + +Of all the features of this historic movement of the Jews from Eastern +Europe to the United States, not the least interesting is their +passing from civilizations whose bonds with their medieval past are +still strong to a civilization which began its course unhampered by +tradition and unyoked to the forms and institutions of the past. The +contrast between the broad freedom of this democracy and the +intolerable despotism from whose yoke most of them fled, has given +them a sense of appreciation of American political and social +institutions that is felt in every movement of their mental life. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[140] So strongly was this the case that the Immigration Commission in +discussing these characteristics was compelled to separate the Jewish +from the "new" immigration, in order to bring out the essential +differences of the latter from the "old" immigration. + + + + +STATISTICAL TABLES + + +TABLE IA + +PARTICIPATION OF JEWS IN OCCUPATIONS IN THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE, 1897[1] + + ------------------------+----------+----------+------------------- + Group of occupation | Total | Jews | Per cent of total + ------------------------+----------+----------+------------------- + Agricultural pursuits | 18245287 | 40611 | .2 + Professional service | 988813 | 71950 | 7.5 + Personal service[2] | 5150012 | 277466 | 5.4 + Manufacturing and | | | + mechanical pursuits | 5169919 | 542563 | 10.5 + Transportation | 714745 | 45944 | 6.4 + Commerce[2] | 1256330 | 452193 | 36.0 + ------------------------+----------+----------+------------------- + Total | 31525106 | 1430727 | 4.5 + ------------------------+----------+----------+------------------- + [1] Compiled from Rubinow, p. 500. + + [2] _Cf._ Rubinow, note, p. 500. + + +TABLE IB + +PARTICIPATION OF JEWS IN OCCUPATIONS IN THE PALE OF JEWISH SETTLEMENT, +1897[1] + + -----------------------+----------+----------+------------------ + Group of occupation | Total | Jews |Per cent of total + -----------------------+----------+----------+------------------ + Agricultural pursuits | 6071413 | 38538 | .6 + Professional service | 317710 | 67238 | 21.1 + Personal service[2] | 2139981 | 250078 | 11.6 + Manufacturing and | | | + mechanical pursuits | 1573519 | 504844 | 32.1 + Transportation | 211983 | 44177 | 20.8 + Commerce[2] | 556086 | 426628 | 76.7 + -----------------------+----------+----------+------------------ + Total | 10870692 | 1331503 | 12.2 + -----------------------+----------+----------+------------------ + + [1] Compiled from Rubinow, p. 501. + + [2] _Cf._ Rubinow, note, p. 500. + + +TABLE II + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION AT THE PORTS OF NEW YORK, PHILADELPHIA AND +BALTIMORE, JULY TO JUNE, 1886 to 1898[1] + + -------+----------+--------------+-----------+-------- + Year | New York | Philadelphia | Baltimore | Total + -------+----------+--------------+-----------+-------- + 1886 | 19548 | 1625 | -- | 21173 + 1887 | 30866 | 2178 | -- | 33044 + 1888 | 26946 | 1935 | -- | 28881 + 1889 | 23958 | 1394 | -- | 25352 + 1890 | 26963 | 1676 | -- | 28639 + 1891 | 47098 | 2719 | 1581[2]| 51398 + 1892 | 66544 | 4677 | 5152 | 76373 + 1893 | 29059 | 4322[3] | 1941 | 35322 + 1894 | 23444 | 3833 | 1902 | 29179 + 1895 | 21422 | 3672 | 1097 | 26191 + 1896 | 27846 | 3016 | 1986 | 32848 + 1897 | 17362 | 1613 | 1397 | 20372 + 1898 | 19222 | 2121 | 2311 | 23654 + -------+----------+--------------+-----------+-------- + Total | 380278 | 34781 | 17367 | 432426 + -------+----------+--------------+-----------+-------- + + [1] Table II and all succeeding tables are arranged from July 1st to + June 30th, the fiscal year. + + [2] Baltimore statistics begin October. + + [3] Philadelphia figures for August missing. + + +TABLE III + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION AT THE PORT OF NEW YORK, JULY, 1885, TO JUNE, 1886, +BY MONTH AND COUNTRY OF NATIVITY[1] + + -----------+--------+-----------------+----------+--------+------- + Month | Russia | Austria-Hungary | Roumania | Others | Total + -----------+--------+-----------------+----------+--------+------- + July | 1130 | 354 | 58 | 107 | 1649 + August | 1512 | 448 | 33 | 121 | 2114 + September | 945 | 185 | 20 | 119 | 1269 + October | 785 | 236 | 12 | 216 | 1249 + November | 1347 | 589 | 21 | 80 | 2037 + December | 574 | 249 | 17 | 62 | 902 + January | 565 | 202 | 4 | 26 | 797 + February | 492 | 228 | 16 | 44 | 780 + March | 1077 | 444 | 35 | 66 | 1622 + April | 639 | 309 | 28 | 55 | 1031 + May | 791 | 521 | 31 | 70 | 1413 + June | 3017 | 1365 | 210 | 93 | 4685 + -----------+--------+-----------------+----------+--------+------- + Total | 12874 | 5130 | 485 | 1059 | 19548 + -----------+--------+-----------------+----------+--------+------- + + [1] Compiled from reports of the United Hebrew Charities of New + York. + + +TABLE IVA + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION AT THE PORT OF PHILADELPHIA, 1886 TO 1898, BY +COUNTRY OF NATIVITY + + -------+------+-----+--------+-----+--------+-----+------+-----+------ + | | Per |Austria-| Per | | Per | | Per | + Year |Russia| cent|Hungary | cent|Roumania| cent|Others| cent|Total + -------+------+-----+--------+-----+--------+-----+------+-----+------ + 1886 | 1218 | 75 | 196 | 12 | 33 | 2 | 178 | 11 | 1625 + 1887 | 1699 | 78 | 262 | 12 | 86 | 4 | 131 | 6 | 2178 + 1888 | 1432 | 74 | 232 | 12 | 97 | 5 | 174 | 9 | 1935 + 1889 | 1129 | 81 | 125 | 9 | 42 | 3 | 98 | 7 | 1394 + 1890 | 1424 | 85 | 184 | 11 | 34 | 2 | 34 | 2 | 1676 + 1891 | 2447 | 90 | [1] | -- | [1] | -- | 272 | 10 | 2719 + 1892 | 3929 | 84 | 561 | 12 | 47 | 1 | 140 | 3 | 4677 + 1893 | 3025 | 70 | 519 | 12 | 43 | 1 | 735 | 17 | 4322 + 1894 | 2951 | 77 | 422 | 11 | 77 | 2 | 383 | 10 | 3833 + 1895 | 1983 | 54 | 624 | 17 | 73 | 2 | 992 | 27 | 3672 + 1896 | 1538 | 51 | 875 | 29 | 60 | 2 | 543 | 18 | 3016 + 1897 | 1049 | 65 | 355 | 22 | 32 | 2 | 177 | 11 | 1613 + 1898 | 1611 | 76 | 382 | 18 | 64 | 3 | 64 | 3 | 2121 + -------+------+-----+--------+-----+--------+-----+------+-----+------ + Total |25435 | 73 | 4737 | 14 | 688 | 2 | 3921 | 11 |34781 + -------+------+-----+--------+-----+--------+-----+------+-----+------ + + [1] Immigrants from Austria-Hungary and Roumania were this year + grouped under "all others" in the original tables. + + +TABLE IVB + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION AT THE PORT OF BALTIMORE, 1891 TO 1898, BY COUNTRY +OF NATIVITY + + -------+------+-----+--------+-----+--------+-----+------+-----+------ + | | Per |Austria-| Per | | Per | | Per | + Year |Russia| cent|Hungary | cent|Roumania| cent|Others| cent| Total + -------+------+-----+--------+-----+--------+-----+------+-----+------ + 1891 | 1423 | 90 | [1] | -- | [1] | -- | 158 | 10 | 1581 + 1892 | 4328 | 84 | 618 | 12 | 52 | 1 | 154 | 3 | 5152 + 1893 | 1388 | 70 | 232 | 12 | 19 | 1 | 302 | 17 | 1941 + 1894 | 1465 | 77 | 209 | 11 | 38 | 2 | 190 | 10 | 1902 + 1895 | 592 | 54 | 187 | 17 | 22 | 2 | 296 | 27 | 1097 + 1896 | 1013 | 51 | 576 | 29 | 40 | 2 | 357 | 18 | 1986 + 1897 | 908 | 65 | 307 | 22 | 28 | 2 | 154 | 11 | 1397 + 1898 | 1757 | 76 | 416 | 18 | 69 | 3 | 69 | 3 | 2311 + -------+------+-----+--------+-----+--------+-----+------+-----+------ + Total |12874 | 74 | 2545 | 15 | 268 | 2 | 1680 | 9 |17367 + -------+------+-----+--------+-----+--------+-----+------+-----+------ + + [1] Immigrants from Austria-Hungary and Roumania were this year + grouped under "all others" in the original tables. + + +TABLE V[1] + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION AT THE PORTS OF NEW YORK, PHILADELPHIA AND +BALTIMORE, 1886 TO 1898, BY COUNTRY OF NATIVITY + + -------+-----------------+-----------------------------------+-------- + | | Ports | + Year | Country of |----------+------------+-----------| Total + | nativity | New York |Philadelphia| Baltimore | + -------+-----------------+----------+------------+-----------+-------- + 1886 | Russia | 12874 | 1218 | -- | 14092 + | Austria-Hungary | 5130 | 196 | -- | 5326 + | Roumania | 485 | 33 | -- | 518 + 1887 | Russia | 21404 | 1699 | -- | 23103 + | Austria-Hungary | 6636 | 262 | -- | 6898 + | Roumania | 1977 | 86 | -- | 2063 + 1888 | Russia | 18784 | 1432 | -- | 20216 + | Austria-Hungary | 5753 | 232 | -- | 5985 + | Roumania | 1556 | 97 | -- | 1653 + 1889 | Russia | 17209 | 1129 | -- | 18338 + | Austria-Hungary | 4873 | 125 | -- | 4998 + | Roumania | 1016 | 42 | -- | 1058 + 1890 | Russia | 19557 | 1424 | -- | 20981 + | Austria-Hungary | 6255 | 184 | -- | 6439 + | Roumania | 428 | 34 | -- | 462 + 1891 | Russia | 39587 | 2447 | 1423 | 43457 + | Austria-Hungary | 5890 | [1] | [1] | 5890 + | Roumania | 854 | [1] | [1] | 854 + 1892 | Russia | 55996 | 3929 | 4328 | 64253 + | Austria-Hungary | 7464 | 561 | 618 | 8643 + | Roumania | 641 | 47 | 52 | 740 + 1893 | Russia | 20748 | 3025 | 1388 | 25161 + | Austria-Hungary | 5612 | 519 | 232 | 6363 + | Roumania | 493 | 43 | 19 | 555 + 1894 | Russia | 16331 | 2951 | 1465 | 20747 + | Austria-Hungary | 5285 | 422 | 209 | 5916 + | Roumania | 501 | 77 | 38 | 616 + 1895 | Russia | 14152 | 1983 | 592 | 16727 + | Austria-Hungary | 5236 | 624 | 187 | 6047 + | Roumania | 423 | 73 | 22 | 518 + 1896 | Russia | 17617 | 1538 | 1013 | 20168 + | Austria-Hungary | 8380 | 875 | 576 | 9831 + | Roumania | 644 | 60 | 40 | 744 + 1897 | Russia | 11106 | 1049 | 908 | 13063 + | Austria-Hungary | 5010 | 355 | 307 | 5672 + | Roumania | 456 | 32 | 28 | 516 + 1898 | Russia | 11581 | 1611 | 1757 | 14949 + | Austria-Hungary | 6569 | 382 | 416 | 7367 + | Roumania | 587 | 64 | 69 | 720 + -------+-----------------+----------+------------+-----------+-------- + Total | ------ | 380278 | 34781 | 17367 | 432426 + -------+-----------------+----------+------------+-----------+-------- + + [1] See note to Tables IVa and IVb. For Tables VI and VII, see + pp. 93 and 94. + + +TABLE VIII + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES, 1881 TO 1910, ABSOLUTE +NUMBERS AND PERCENTAGES, BY DECADE AND COUNTRY OF NATIVITY + + -------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------- + | Absolute numbers | Percentages + Country of +-------+---------------+-------+-----+-----+------ + nativity | | 1881- | 1891- | 1901- |1881-|1891-|1901- + | Total | 1890 | 1900 | 1910 |1890 |1900 |1910 + -------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-----+-----+------ + Russia |1119059| 135003| 279811| 704245| 69.9| 71.1| 72.1 + Austria-Hungary | 281150| 44619| 83720| 152811| 23.1| 21.3| 15.7 + Roumania | 67057| 6967| 12789| 47301| 3.6| 3.2| 4.8 + United Kingdom | 42589| -- | -- | 42589| --| --| 4.4 + Germany | 20454| 5354| 8827| 6273| 2.8| 2.3| .7 + British North | | | | | | | + America | 9701| -- | -- | 9701| --| --| 1.0 + Turkey | 5081| -- | -- | 5081| --| --| .5 + France | 2273| -- | -- | 2273| --| --| .2 + All others | 15436| 1078| 8369| 5989| .6| 2.1| .6 + -------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-----+------------ + Total |1562800| 193021| 393516| 976263|100.0|100.0|100.0 + -------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-----+------------ + + +TABLE IX + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM RUSSIA, 1881 TO 1910, BY YEAR AND PERCENTAGE +OF TOTAL ARRIVING EACH YEAR + + -------+-------------------+------------------- + Year | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + -------+-------------------+------------------- + 1881 | 3125 | 0.3 + 1882 | 10489 | 0.9 + 1883 | 6144 | 0.5 + 1884 | 7867 | 0.7 + 1885 | 10648 | 1.0 + 1886 | 14092 | 1.3 + 1887 | 23103 | 2.1 + 1888 | 20216 | 1.8 + 1889 | 18338 | 1.6 + 1890 | 20981 | 1.9 + 1891 | 43457 | 3.9 + 1892 | 64253 | 5.7 + 1893 | 25161 | 2.2 + 1894 | 20747 | 1.9 + 1895 | 16727 | 1.5 + 1896 | 20168 | 1.8 + 1897 | 13063 | 1.2 + 1898 | 14949 | 1.3 + 1899 | 24275 | 2.2 + 1900 | 37011 | 3.3 + 1901 | 37660 | 3.4 + 1902 | 37846 | 3.4 + 1903 | 47689 | 4.3 + 1904 | 77544 | 6.9 + 1905 | 92388 | 8.2 + 1906 | 125234 | 11.2 + 1907 | 114932 | 10.3 + 1908 | 71978 | 6.4 + 1909 | 39150 | 3.5 + 1910 | 59824 | 5.3 + -------+-------------------+------------------- + Total | 1119059 | 100.0 + -------+-------------------+------------------- + + +TABLE X + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM RUSSIA, 1887 to 1910, BY DECADE AND PERCENTAGE +OF TOTAL ARRIVING EACH DECADE + + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Decade | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + 1881-1890 | 135003 | 12.1 + 1891-1900 | 279811 | 25.0 + 1901-1910 | 704245 | 62.9 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Total | 1119059 | 100.0 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + + +TABLE XI + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM RUSSIA AT THE PORT OF NEW YORK, JANUARY 1, +1891 TO DECEMBER 31, 1891, AND JANUARY 1, 1892 TO DECEMBER 31, 1892, +BY MONTH + +(From reports of United Hebrew Charities of New York City, 1891 and +1892) + + ---------------+----------------------- + | Jewish immigrants + +----------+------------ + Month | 1891 | 1892 + ---------------+----------+------------ + January | 2179 | 3276 + February | 2185 | 3057 + March | 3150 | 2397 + April | 2714 | 1468 + May | 1225 | 1620 + June | 8667 | 4028 + July | 8253 | 5673 + August | 9109 | 4842 + September | 9422 | 1729 + October | 5255 | 416 + November | 3792 | 121 + December | 4310 | 198 + ---------------+----------+------------ + Total | 60261 | 28834 + ---------------+----------+------------ + + +TABLE XII + +TOTAL IMMIGRATION FROM RUSSIA AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM RUSSIA, 1881 +TO 1910, AND PERCENTAGE JEWISH OF TOTAL + + --------+------------+------------+------------- + | Total | Jewish | Per cent of + | immigrants | immigrants | total + --------+------------+------------+------------- + 1881 | 5041 | 3125 | Est. + 1882 | 16918 | 10489 | + 1883 | 9909 | 6144 | at + 1884 | 12689 | 7867 | + 1885 | 17158 | 10648 | 62.0 + 1886 | 17800 | 14092 | 79.2 + 1887 | 30766 | 23103 | 75.1 + 1888 | 33487 | 20316 | 60.4 + 1889 | 33916 | 18338 | 54.1 + 1890 | 35598 | 20981 | 58.9 + | | | + 1891 | 47426 | 43457 | 91.6 + 1892 | 81511 | 64253 | 78.8 + 1893 | 42310 | 25161 | 59.5 + 1894 | 39278 | 20747 | 52.8 + 1895 | 35907 | 16727 | 43.2 + 1896 | 51435 | 20168 | 39.2 + 1897 | 25816 | 13063 | 50.6 + 1898 | 29828 | 14949 | 50.1 + 1899 | 60982 | 24275 | 39.8 + 1900 | 90787 | 37011 | 40.8 + | | | + 1901 | 85257 | 37660 | 44.2 + 1902 | 107347 | 37846 | 35.3 + 1903 | 136093 | 47689 | 35.0 + 1904 | 145141 | 77544 | 53.4 + 1905 | 184897 | 92388 | 50.0 + 1906 | 215665 | 125234 | 58.1 + 1907 | 258943 | 114932 | 44.4 + 1908 | 156711 | 71978 | 45.9 + 1909 | 120460 | 39150 | 32.5 + 1910 | 186792 | 59824 | 32.1 + --------+------------+------------+------------- + Total | 2315868 | 1119059 | 48.3 + --------+------------+------------+------------- + + +TABLE XIII + +TOTAL IMMIGRATION FROM RUSSIA AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM RUSSIA, 1881 +TO 1910, BY DECADE, AND PERCENTAGE JEWISH OF TOTAL + + ------------+------------+------------+------------- + Decade | Total | Jewish | Per cent of + | immigrants | immigrants | total + ------------+------------+------------+------------- + 1881-1890 | 213282 | 135003 | 63.3 + 1891-1900 | 505280 | 279811 | 55.4 + 1901-1910 | 1597306 | 704245 | 44.1 + ------------+------------+------------+------------- + Total | 2315868 | 1119059 | 48.3 + ------------+------------+------------+------------- + + +TABLE XIV + +IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES FROM THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE, 1899 TO +1910, BY ANNUAL PERCENTAGE OF CONTRIBUTION OF PRINCIPAL PEOPLES[1] + + -------+---------+--------+--------+------------+--------+--------- + | Finnish | German | Jewish | Lithuanian | Polish | Russian + -------+---------+--------+--------+------------+--------+--------- + 1899 | 9.9 | 8.8 | 39.8 | 11.2 | 25.4 | 2.7 + 1900 | 13.8 | 5.9 | 40.8 | 11.3 | 24.8 | 1.3 + 1901 | 11.7 | 6.6 | 44.2 | 10.0 | 25.2 | .8 + 1902 | 12.9 | 8.0 | 35.3 | 9.3 | 31.5 | 1.4 + 1903 | 13.8 | 7.7 | 35.0 | 10.6 | 29.1 | 2.6 + 1904 | 6.9 | 4.9 | 53.4 | 8.8 | 22.4 | 2.7 + 1905 | 9.0 | 3.6 | 50.0 | 9.5 | 25.5 | 1.8 + 1906 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 58.1 | 6.4 | 21.4 | 2.4 + 1907 | 5.5 | 5.2 | 44.4 | 9.6 | 28.2 | 6.2 + 1908 | 4.0 | 6.4 | 45.9 | 8.5 | 24.2 | 10.4 + 1909 | 9.3 | 6.5 | 32.5 | 12.1 | 31.4 | 7.6 + 1910 | 8.0 | 5.4 | 32.1 | 11.6 | 34.1 | 7.9 + -------+---------+--------+--------+------------+--------+--------- + Total | 8.5 | 5.8 | 43.8 | 9.6 | 27.0 | 4.4 + -------+---------+--------+--------+------------+--------+--------- + [1] From Immigration Commission: _Emigration Conditions in + Europe_, p. 338. + + +TABLE XV + +RATE OF IMMIGRATION OF PEOPLES PREDOMINANT IN THE IMMIGRATION FROM +RUSSIA, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + ------------+--------------------+-------------------+---------------- + | |Average annual | + |Population in Russia|immigration to U.S.| Ratio of + People |1897 and in Finland |from Russia and | immigration + | 1900 combined |Finland 1899-1910 | to population + ------------+--------------------+-------------------+---------------- + Jewish | 5082343[2] | 63794 | 1 to 79 + Finnish | 2352990 | 12348 | 1 to 191 + Polish | 7865437 | 39282 | 1 to 200 + German | 1721387 | 8401 | 1 to 205 + Lithuanian | 3077436 | 14062 | 1 to 212 + Swedish | 349733 | 1135 | 1 to 308 + Russian | 75434753 | 6530 | 1 to 11552 + ------------+--------------------+-------------------+---------------- + + [1] Ibid., p. 339. + + [2] The figure for the Jewish population in Russia as given in + _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 339, is incorrect. + See Goldberg, _Juedische Statistik_, pages 266 and 270. + + +TABLE XVI + +RATE OF JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM RUSSIA, PER 10000 OF JEWISH +POPULATION, 1899 TO 1910 + + ------+---------------------- + Year | Ratio of immigration + ------+---------------------- + 1899 | 47 + 1900 | 72 + 1901 | 74 + 1902 | 74 + 1903 | 93 + 1904 | 152 + 1905 | 181 + 1906 | 246 + 1907 | 226 + 1908 | 141 + 1909 | 77 + 1910 | 117 + ------+---------------------- + Total | 125 + ------+---------------------- + + +TABLE XVII + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM ROUMANIA, 1881 TO 1910, BY DECADE AND +PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ARRIVING EACH DECADE + + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Decade | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + 1881-1890 | 6067 | 10.4 + 1891-1900 | 12789 | 19.1 + 1901-1910 | 47301 | 70.5 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Total | 67057 | 100.0 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + + +TABLE XVIII + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM ROUMANIA, 1881 TO 1910, BY YEAR AND PERCENTAGE +OF TOTAL ARRIVING EACH YEAR + + --------+-------------------+------------------- + Year | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + --------+-------------------+------------------- + 1881 | 30 | [1] + 1882 | 65 | .1 + 1883 | 77 | .1 + 1884 | 238 | .3 + 1885 | 803 | 1.2 + 1886 | 518 | .8 + 1887 | 2063 | 3.1 + 1888 | 1653 | 2.5 + 1889 | 1058 | 1.6 + 1890 | 462 | .7 + | | + 1891 | 854 | 1.3 + 1892 | 740 | 1.1 + 1893 | 555 | .8 + 1894 | 616 | .9 + 1895 | 518 | .8 + 1896 | 744 | 1.1 + 1897 | 516 | .8 + 1898 | 720 | 1.1 + 1899 | 1343 | 2.0 + 1900 | 6183 | 9.2 + | | + 1901 | 6827 | 10.2 + 1902 | 6589 | 9.8 + 1903 | 8562 | 12.8 + 1904 | 6446 | 9.6 + 1905 | 3854 | 5.7 + 1906 | 3872 | 5.8 + 1907 | 3605 | 5.4 + 1908 | 4455 | 6.6 + 1909 | 1390 | 2.1 + 1910 | 1701 | 2.5 + --------+-------------------+------------------- + Total | 67057 | 100.0 + --------+-------------------+------------------- + + [1] Below one-tenth per cent. + + +TABLE XIX + +TOTAL IMMIGRATION FROM ROUMANIA AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM ROUMANIA, +1899 TO 1910, AND PERCENTAGE JEWISH OF TOTAL + + --------+----------------+-----------------+------------------- + Year |Total immigrants|Jewish immigrants|Per cent of total + --------+----------------+-----------------+------------------- + 1899 | 1606 | 1343 | 83.6 + 1900 | 6459 | 6183 | 95.7 + 1901 | 7155 | 6827 | 95.4 + 1902 | 7196 | 6589 | 91.6 + 1903 | 9310 | 8562 | 91.9 + 1904 | 7087 | 6446 | 91.0 + 1905 | 4437 | 3854 | 86.8 + 1906 | 4476 | 3872 | 86.5 + 1907 | 4384 | 3605 | 82.2 + 1908 | 5228 | 4455 | 85.2 + 1909 | 1590 | 1390 | 87.4 + 1910 | 2145 | 1701 | 79.3 + --------+----------------+-----------------+------------------- + Total | 61073 | 54827 | 89.8 + --------+----------------+-----------------+------------------- + + +TABLE XX + +RATE OF JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM ROUMANIA, PER 10000 OF JEWISH +POPULATION, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + --------+----------------------- + Year | Ratio of immigration + --------+----------------------- + 1899 | 51 + 1900 | 238 + 1901 | 262 + 1902 | 253 + 1903 | 329 + 1904 | 246 + 1905 | 148 + 1906 | 149 + 1907 | 138 + 1908 | 171 + 1909 | 53 + 1910 | 65 + --------+----------------------- + Total | 175 + --------+----------------------- + + [1] For Jewish population in Roumania _cf._ Ruppin, _The Jews of + To-Day_, p. 39. + + +TABLE XXI + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM AUSTRIA-HUNGARY, 1881 TO 1910, BY DECADE AND +PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ARRIVING EACH DECADE + + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Decade | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + 1881-1890 | 44619 | 15.9 + 1891-1900 | 83720 | 29.8 + 1901-1910 | 152811 | 54.3 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Total | 281150 | 100.0 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + + +TABLE XXII + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM AUSTRIA-HUNGARY, 1881 TO 1910, BY YEAR, AND +PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ARRIVING EACH YEAR + + ----------+-------------------+------------------- + Year | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + ----------+-------------------+------------------- + 1881 | 2537 | .9 + 1882 | 2648 | .9 + 1883 | 2510 | .9 + 1884 | 3340 | 1.2 + 1885 | 3938 | 1.4 + 1886 | 5326 | 1.9 + 1887 | 6898 | 2.4 + 1888 | 5985 | 2.1 + 1889 | 4998 | 1.8 + 1890 | 6439 | 2.3 + | | + 1891 | 5890 | 2.1 + 1892 | 8643 | 3.1 + 1893 | 6363 | 2.3 + 1894 | 5916 | 2.1 + 1895 | 6047 | 2.2 + 1896 | 9831 | 3.5 + 1897 | 5672 | 2.0 + 1898 | 7367 | 2.6 + 1899 | 11071 | 3.9 + 1900 | 16920 | 6.0 + | | + 1901 | 13006 | 4.6 + 1902 | 12848 | 4.6 + 1903 | 18759 | 6.7 + 1904 | 20211 | 7.2 + 1905 | 17352 | 6.2 + 1906 | 14884 | 5.3 + 1907 | 18885 | 6.7 + 1908 | 15293 | 5.4 + 1909 | 8431 | 3.0 + 1910 | 13142 | 4.7 + ----------+-------------------+------------------- + Total | 281150 | 100.0 + ----------+-------------------+------------------- + + +TABLE XXIII + +TOTAL AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM AUSTRIA-HUNGARY, 1881 TO 1910, BY +DECADE AND PERCENTAGE JEWISH OF TOTAL + + -----------+----------------+-----------------+------------------ + Decade |Total immigrants|Jewish immigrants|Per cent of total + -----------+----------------+-----------------+------------------ + 1881-1890 | 353719 | 44619 | 12.6 + 1891-1900 | 592707 | 83720 | 14.1 + 1901-1910 | 2145266 | 158811 | 7.4 + -----------+----------------+-----------------+------------------ + Total | 3091692 | 281150 | 9.1 + -----------+----------------+-----------------+------------------ + + +TABLE XXIV + +TOTAL AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM AUSTRIA-HUNGARY, 1881 TO 1910, AND +PERCENTAGE JEWISH OF TOTAL + + -------------------------------------------------------------------- + Year | Total immigrants | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + ----------+------------------+-------------------+------------------ + 1881 | 27935 | 2537 | Est. + 1882 | 29150 | 2648 | at + 1883 | 27625 | 2510 | + 1884 | 36571 | 3340 | 9.0 + 1885 | 27309 | 3938 | 14.4 + 1886 | 28680 | 5326 | 18.6 + 1887 | 40265 | 6898 | 17.1 + 1888 | 45811 | 5985 | 13.1 + 1889 | 34174 | 4998 | 14.6 + 1890 | 56199 | 6439 | 11.5 + | | | + 1891 | 71042 | 5890 | 8.3 + 1892 | 76937 | 8643 | 11.2 + 1893 | 57420 | 6363 | 11.1 + 1894 | 38638 | 5916 | 15.3 + 1895 | 33401 | 6047 | 18.1 + 1896 | 65103 | 9831 | 15.1 + 1897 | 33031 | 5672 | 17.2 + 1898 | 39797 | 7367 | 18.5 + 1899 | 62401 | 11071 | 17.7 + 1900 | 114847 | 16920 | 14.7 + | | | + 1901 | 113390 | 13006 | 11.5 + 1902 | 171989 | 12848 | 7.5 + 1903 | 206011 | 18759 | 9.1 + 1904 | 177156 | 20211 | 11.4 + 1905 | 275693 | 17352 | 6.3 + 1906 | 265138 | 14884 | 5.6 + 1907 | 338452 | 18885 | 5.6 + 1908 | 168509 | 15293 | 9.1 + 1909 | 170191 | 8431 | 5.0 + 1910 | 258737 | 13142 | 5.1 + ----------+------------------+-------------------+------------------ + Total | 3091692 | 281150 | 9.1 + -------------------------------------------------------------------- + + +TABLE XXV + +PERCENTAGE OF ANNUAL IMMIGRATION FROM AUSTRIA-HUNGARY CONTRIBUTED BY +PRINCIPAL PEOPLES, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + --------+--------+--------+----------- + Year | Polish | Jewish | Ruthenian + --------+--------+--------+----------- + 1899 | 18.7 | 17.7 | 2.2 + 1900 | 19.9 | 14.7 | 2.5 + 1901 | 17.9 | 11.5 | 4.7 + 1902 | 18.9 | 7.5 | 4.4 + 1903 | 18.2 | 9.1 | 4.8 + 1904 | 17.1 | 11.4 | 5.3 + 1905 | 18.4 | 6.3 | 5.2 + 1906 | 16.5 | 5.6 | 5.9 + 1907 | 17.6 | 5.6 | 7.0 + 1908 | 15.7 | 9.1 | 7.2 + 1909 | 21.4 | 5.0 | 9.0 + 1910 | 22.6 | 4.9 | 10.2 + --------+--------+--------+----------- + Total | 18.6 | 7.8 | 6.2 + --------+--------+--------+----------- + + [1] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 373. + + +TABLE XXVI + +RATE OF JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM AUSTRIA-HUNGARY, PER 10000 OF JEWISH +POPULATION, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + --------+---------------------- + | Ratio of immigration + --------+---------------------- + 1899 | 53 + 1900 | 83 + 1901 | 63 + 1902 | 62 + 1903 | 90 + 1904 | 97 + 1905 | 84 + 1906 | 72 + 1907 | 91 + 1908 | 74 + 1909 | 41 + 1910 | 63 + --------+---------------------- + Total | 74 + --------+---------------------- + + [1] For Jewish population in Austria-Hungary _cf._ Ruppin, _The + Jews of To-Day_, pp. 38-39. + + +TABLE XXVII + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION, 1881 TO 1910, BY DECADE + + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Decade | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + 1881-1890 | 193021 | 12.3 + 1891-1900 | 393516 | 25.2 + 1900-1910 | 976263 | 62.5 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Total | 1562800 | 100.0 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + + +TABLE XXVIII + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION, 1881 TO 1910, BY SIX-YEAR PERIOD + + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Period | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + 1881-1886 | 77105 | 4.9 + 1887-1892 | 243687 | 15.6 + 1893-1898 | 167566 | 10.7 + 1899-1904 | 396404 | 25.4 + 1905-1910 | 678038 | 43.4 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + Total | 1562800 | 100.0 + -----------+-------------------+------------------- + + +TABLE XXIX + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES, 1881 TO 1910 + + -------+-------------------+-------------------- + Year | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + -------+-------------------+-------------------- + 1881 | 5692 | .4 + 1882 | 13202 | .8 + 1883 | 8731 | .5 + 1884 | 11445 | .7 + 1885 | 16862 | 1.1 + 1886 | 21173 | 1.3 + 1887 | 33044 | 2.1 + 1888 | 28881 | 1.8 + 1889 | 25352 | 1.6 + 1890 | 28639 | 1.8 + | | + 1891 | 51398 | 3.3 + 1892 | 76373 | 4.9 + 1893 | 35322 | 2.3 + 1894 | 29179 | 1.9 + 1895 | 26191 | 1.7 + 1896 | 32848 | 2.1 + 1897 | 20372 | 1.3 + 1898 | 23654 | 1.5 + 1899 | 37415 | 2.4 + 1900 | 60764 | 3.9 + | | + 1901 | 58008 | 3.7 + 1902 | 57688 | 3.7 + 1903 | 76203 | 4.9 + 1904 | 106236 | 6.8 + 1905 | 129910 | 8.3 + 1906 | 153748 | 9.9 + 1907 | 149182 | 9.6 + 1908 | 103387 | 6.6 + 1909 | 57551 | 3.7 + 1910 | 84260 | 5.4 + -------+-------------------+-------------------- + Total | 1562800 | 100.0 + -------+-------------------+-------------------- + + +TABLE XXX + +TOTAL IMMIGRATION AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION, 1881 TO 1910, BY DECADE AND +PERCENTAGE JEWISH OF TOTAL + + -----------+------------+------------+---------- + Decade | Total | Jewish | Per cent + | immigrants | immigrants | of total + -----------+------------+------------+---------- + 1881-1890 | 5246613 | 193021 | 3.7 + 1891-1900 | 3687564 | 393516 | 10.7 + 1901-1910 | 8795386 | 976263 | 11.1 + -----------+------------+------------+---------- + Total | 17729563 | 1562800 | 8.8 + -----------+------------+------------+---------- + + +TABLE XXXI + +TOTAL IMMIGRATION AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION, 1881 TO 1910, BY YEAR AND +PERCENTAGE JEWISH OF TOTAL + + -----------+------------+------------+----------- + Year | Total | Jewish | Per cent + | immigrants | immigrants | of total + -----------+------------+------------+----------- + 1881 | 669431 | 5692 | .9 + 1882 | 788992 | 13202 | 1.7 + 1883 | 603322 | 8731 | 1.4 + 1884 | 518592 | 11445 | 2.2 + 1885 | 395346 | 16862 | 4.3 + 1886 | 334203 | 21173 | 6.3 + 1887 | 490109 | 33044 | 6.7 + 1888 | 546889 | 28881 | 5.3 + 1889 | 444427 | 25352 | 5.7 + 1890 | 455302 | 28639 | 6.3 + | | | + 1891 | 560319 | 51398 | 9.2 + 1892 | 579663 | 76373 | 13.2 + 1893 | 439730 | 35322 | 8.0 + 1894 | 285631 | 29179 | 10.2 + 1895 | 258536 | 26191 | 10.1 + 1896 | 343267 | 32848 | 9.6 + 1897 | 230832 | 20372 | 8.8 + 1898 | 229229 | 23654 | 10.7 + 1899 | 311715 | 37415 | 12.0 + 1900 | 448572 | 60764 | 13.5 + | | | + 1901 | 487918 | 58098 | 12.1 + 1902 | 648743 | 57688 | 8.9 + 1903 | 857046 | 76203 | 8.9 + 1904 | 812870 | 106236 | 11.8 + 1905 | 1026499 | 129910 | 12.6 + 1906 | 1100735 | 153748 | 13.4 + 1907 | 1285349 | 149182 | 11.6 + 1908[1] | 782870 | 103387 | 13.2 + 1909[1] | 751786 | 57551 | 7.7 + 1910[1] | 1041570 | 84260 | 8.1 + -----------+------------+------------+----------- + Total | 17729563 | 1562800 | 8.8 + -----------+------------+------------+----------- + + [1] Only immigrant aliens taken these years. + + +TABLE XXXII + +TOTAL AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION, 1881 TO 1910, BY NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE +OF INCREASE OR DECREASE + + --------+-------------------+------------------- + | Total immigrants | Jewish immigrants + +-------------------+------------------- + Year | Increase (+) | Increase (+) + | or decrease (-) | or decrease (-) + +----------+--------+---------+--------- + | Number | Per | Number | Per + | | cent | | cent + --------+----------+--------+---------+--------- + 1881 | -- | -- | -- | -- + 1882 | +119561 | +17.9 | + 7509 | +131.9 + 1883 | -185670 | -23.5 | - 4471 | - 33.9 + 1884 | - 84730 | -14.0 | + 2714 | + 31.1 + 1885 | -123246 | -23.8 | + 5417 | + 47.3 + 1886 | - 61143 | -15.5 | + 4491 | + 26.7 + 1887 | +155906 | +46.7 | +11871 | + 56.1 + 1888 | + 56780 | +11.6 | + 4163 | + 12.6 + 1889 | -102462 | -18.7 | - 3529 | - 12.2 + 1890 | + 10875 | + 2.4 | + 3287 | + 13.0 + | | | | + 1891 | +105017 | +20.9 | +22759 | + 79.5 + 1892 | + 19344 | + 3.4 | +24975 | + 48.6 + 1893 | -139933 | -24.1 | -39051 | - 51.1 + 1894 | -154099 | -35.0 | - 6143 | - 17.4 + 1895 | - 27095 | - 9.5 | - 2988 | - 10.2 + 1896 | + 84731 | +32.8 | + 6657 | + 25.4 + 1897 | -112435 | -32.8 | -12476 | - 38.0 + 1898 | - 1533 | - .7 | + 3282 | + 16.1 + 1899 | + 82416 | +36.0 | +13761 | + 58.2 + 1900 | +136857 | +43.9 | +23349 | + 62.4 + | | | | + 1901 | + 39346 | + 8.8 | - 2666 | - 4.4 + 1902 | +160825 | +33.0 | - 410 | - .7 + 1903 | +208303 | +32.1 | +18515 | + 32.1 + 1904 | - 44176 | - 5.2 | +30033 | + 39.4 + 1905 | +213629 | +26.3 | +23674 | + 22.1 + 1906 | + 74236 | + 7.2 | +23838 | + 18.2 + 1907 | +184614 | +16.8 | - 4566 | - 3.0 + 1908 | -502479 | -39.1 | -45795 | - 30.7 + 1909 | - 31084 | - 4.0 | -45836 | - 44.3 + 1910 | +289784 | +38.5 | +26709 | + 46.4 + --------+----------+--------+---------+--------- + + +TABLE XXXIII + +SEX OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + -------+---------+-----------------+--------------- + | | Number | Per cent + Year | Total +--------+--------+------+-------- + | | Male | Female | Male | Female + -------+---------+--------+--------+------+-------- + 1899 | 37415 | 21153 | 16262 | 56.5 | 43.5 + 1900 | 60764 | 36330 | 24434 | 59.8 | 40.2 + 1901 | 58098 | 32345 | 25753 | 55.7 | 44.3 + 1902 | 57688 | 32737 | 24951 | 56.7 | 44.3 + 1903 | 76203 | 43985 | 32218 | 57.7 | 42.3 + 1904 | 106236 | 65040 | 41196 | 61.2 | 38.8 + 1905 | 129910 | 82076 | 47834 | 63.2 | 36.8 + 1906 | 153748 | 80086 | 73662 | 52.1 | 47.9 + 1907 | 149182 | 80530 | 68652 | 54.0 | 46.0 + 1908 | 103387 | 56277 | 47110 | 54.4 | 45.6 + 1909 | 57551 | 31057 | 26494 | 54.0 | 46.0 + 1910 | 84260 | 46206 | 38054 | 54.8 | 45.2 + -------+---------+--------+--------+------+-------- + Total | 1074442 | 607822 | 466620 | 56.6 | 43.4 + -------+---------+--------+--------+------+-------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE XXXIV + +SEX OF JEWISH IMMIGRANT ADULTS[1] AT THE PORT OF NEW YORK, 1886 TO +1898[2] + + -------+---------+-----------------+--------------- + | | Number | Per cent + Year | Total +--------+--------+------+-------- + | | Male | Female | Male | Female + -------+---------+--------+--------+------+-------- + 1886 | 14212 | 9598 | 4614 | 67.5 | 32.5 + 1887 | 22223 | 13872 | 8351 | 62.4 | 37.6 + 1888 | 19456 | 11691 | 7765 | 60.1 | 39.9 + 1889 | 17155 | 9946 | 7209 | 58.0 | 42.0 + 1890 | 19449 | 11524 | 7925 | 59.3 | 40.7 + 1891 | 33343 | 20980 | 12363 | 62.9 | 37.1 + 1892 | 43155 | 25338 | 17817 | 58.7 | 41.3 + 1893 | 18314 | 9715 | 8599 | 53.0 | 47.0 + 1894 | 13142 | 6404 | 6738 | 48.7 | 51.3 + 1895 | 12366 | 6275 | 6091 | 50.7 | 49.3 + 1896 | 17052 | 9703 | 7349 | 56.9 | 43.1 + 1897 | 10226 | 5447 | 4779 | 53.3 | 46.7 + 1898 | 11530 | 6560 | 4970 | 56.9 | 43.1 + -------+---------+--------+--------+------+-------- + Total | 251623 | 147053 | 104570 | 58.4 | 41.6 + -------+---------+--------+--------+------+-------- + + [1] Sixteen years of age and over. + + [2] From _Reports of United Hebrew Charities of N.Y. City_. + + +TABLE XXXV + +AGE OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + ------+---------+--------------------------+------------------------ + | | Number | Percentage + Year| Total +--------+--------+--------+-------+-------+-------- + | | Under | 14 to | 45 and | Under | 14 to | 45 and + | | 14 | 44 | over | 14 | 44 | over + ------+---------+--------+--------+--------+-------+-------+-------- + 1899 | 37415 | 8987 | 26019 | 2409 | 24.0 | 69.5 | 6.5 + 1900 | 60764 | 13092 | 44239 | 3433 | 21.6 | 72.8 | 5.6 + 1901 | 58098 | 14731 | 39830 | 3537 | 25.4 | 68.6 | 6.0 + 1902 | 57688 | 15312 | 38937 | 3439 | 26.5 | 67.5 | 6.0 + 1903 | 76203 | 19044 | 53074 | 4085 | 25.0 | 69.6 | 5.4 + 1904 | 106236 | 23529 | 77224 | 5483 | 22.1 | 72.7 | 5.2 + 1905 | 129910 | 28553 | 95964 | 5393 | 22.0 | 73.9 | 4.1 + 1906 | 153748 | 43620 | 101875 | 8253 | 28.4 | 66.2 | 5.4 + 1907 | 149182 | 37696 | 103779 | 7707 | 25.3 | 69.5 | 5.2 + 1908 | 103387 | 26013 | 71388 | 5986 | 25.1 | 69.1 | 5.8 + 1909 | 57551 | 15210 | 38465 | 3876 | 26.5 | 66.7 | 6.8 + 1910 | 84260 | 21869 | 57191 | 5200 | 26.0 | 67.9 | 6.1 + ------+---------+--------+--------+--------+-------+-------+-------- + Total| 1074442 | 267656 | 747985 | 58801 | 24.9 | 69.6 | 5.5 + ------+---------+--------+--------+--------+-------+-------+-------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE XXXVI + +AGE OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS AT THE PORT OF NEW YORK, 1886 TO 1898[1] + + -------+--------+--------------------+--------------------- + | | Number | Percentage + Year | Total +--------+-----------+--------+------------ + | | Adults |Children[2]| Adults |Children[2] + -------+--------+--------+-----------+--------+------------ + 1886 | 19548 | 14212 | 5336 | 72.7 | 27.3 + 1887 | 30866 | 22223 | 8643 | 72.0 | 28.0 + 1888 | 26946 | 19456 | 7490 | 72.2 | 27.8 + 1889 | 23958 | 17155 | 6803 | 71.6 | 28.4 + 1890 | 26963 | 19449 | 7514 | 72.1 | 27.9 + 1891 | 47098 | 33343 | 13755 | 70.8 | 29.2 + 1892 | 66544 | 43155 | 23389 | 64.8 | 35.2 + 1893 | 29059 | 18314 | 10745 | 63.0 | 37.0 + 1894 | 23444 | 13142 | 10302 | 56.1 | 43.9 + 1895 | 21422 | 12366 | 9056 | 57.7 | 42.3 + 1896 | 27846 | 17052 | 10794 | 61.2 | 38.8 + 1897 | 17362 | 10226 | 7136 | 58.9 | 41.1 + 1898 | 19222 | 11530 | 7692 | 60.0 | 40.0 + -------+--------+--------+-----------+--------+------------ + Total | 380278 | 251623 | 128655 | 66.2 | 33.8 + -------+--------+--------+-----------+--------+------------ + + [1] From _Reports of United Hebrew Charities of N.Y. City_. + + [2] Children under sixteen. + + +TABLE XXXVII + +SEX OF TOTAL AND JEWISH IMMIGRANTS, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + -------+-------------------+------------------ + | Total immigrants |Jewish immigrants + +-------------------+------------------ + Year | Per cent | Per cent + +--------+----------+--------+--------- + | Male | Female | Male | Female + -------+--------+----------+--------+--------- + 1899 | 62.6 | 37.4 | 56.5 | 43.5 + 1900 | 67.8 | 32.2 | 59.8 | 40.2 + 1901 | 67.9 | 32.1 | 55.7 | 44.3 + 1902 | 71.9 | 28.1 | 56.7 | 43.3 + 1903 | 71.5 | 28.5 | 57.7 | 42.3 + 1904 | 67.6 | 32.4 | 61.2 | 38.8 + 1905 | 70.6 | 29.4 | 63.2 | 36.8 + 1906 | 69.5 | 30.5 | 52.1 | 47.9 + 1907 | 72.4 | 27.6 | 54.0 | 46.0 + 1908 | 64.8 | 35.2 | 54.4 | 45.6 + 1909 | 69.2 | 30.8 | 54.0 | 46.0 + 1910 | 70.7 | 29.3 | 54.8 | 45.2 + -------+--------+----------+--------+--------- + Total | 69.5 | 30.5 | 56.6 | 43.4 + -------+--------+----------+--------+--------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE XXXVIII + +SEX[1] OF EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS,[2] 1899 TO 1910[3] + + ------------------------+---------+-------------------+--------------- + | | Number | Per cent + People | Total |---------+---------+------+-------- + | | Male | Female | Male | Female + ------------------------+---------+---------+---------+------+-------- + Irish | 439724 | 210686 | 229038 | 47.9 | 52.1 + Jewish | 1074442 | 607822 | 466620 | 56.6 | 43.4 + Bohemian and Moravian | 100189 | 57111 | 43078 | 57.0 | 43.0 + French | 115783 | 67217 | 48566 | 58.1 | 41.9 + German | 754375 | 448054 | 306321 | 59.4 | 40.6 + English | 408614 | 251421 | 157193 | 61.5 | 38.5 + Scandinavian | 586306 | 362467 | 223839 | 61.8 | 38.2 + Scotch | 136842 | 86938 | 49904 | 63.5 | 36.5 + Finnish | 151774 | 100289 | 51485 | 66.1 | 33.9 + Polish | 949064 | 659267 | 289797 | 69.5 | 30.5 + Slovak | 377527 | 266262 | 111265 | 70.5 | 29.5 + Lithuanian | 175258 | 123777 | 51481 | 70.6 | 29.4 + Magyar | 338151 | 244221 | 93930 | 72.2 | 27.8 + Ruthenian | 147375 | 109614 | 37761 | 74.4 | 25.6 + Italian North | 372668 | 291877 | 80791 | 78.3 | 21.7 + Italian South | 1911933 | 1502968 | 408965 | 78.6 | 21.4 + Croatian and Slovenian | 355543 | 284866 | 50677 | 84.9 | 15.1 + Greek | 216962 | 206306 | 10656 | 95.1 | 4.9 + ------------------------+---------+---------+---------+------+-------- + Total[4] | 9555673 | 6641367 | 2914306 | 69.5 | 30.5 + ------------------------+---------+---------+---------+------+-------- + + [1] Arranged in order of percentage of females. + + [2] Excluding all races with an immigration below 100,000. + + [3] From _Statistical Review of Immigration_, p. 49. + + [4] Total includes all races. + + +TABLE XXXIX + +AGE[1] OF EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS,[2] 1899 TO 1909. + + ----------------+----------------------------------+--------------------- + | Number | Per cent + People +--------+--------+--------+-------+------+------+------- + | Total | Under | 14 to | 45 and| Under| 14 to|45 and + | | 14 | 44 | over | 14 | 44 | over + ----------------+--------+--------+--------+-------+------+------+------- + Jewish | 990182| 245787 | 690794 | 53601 | 24.8 | 69.8 | 5.4 + Bohemian and | | | | | | | + Moravian | 91727| 18965 | 67487 | 5275 | 20.7 | 73.6 | 5.8 + German | 682995| 116416 | 520437 | 46142 | 17.0 | 76.2 | 6.8 + Scotch | 112230| 17157 | 85123 | 9950 | 15.3 | 75.8 | 8.9 + English | 355116| 52459 | 262334 | 40323 | 14.8 | 73.9 | 11.4 + Italian, South | 1719260| 201492 |1416075 |101693 | 11.7 | 82.4 | 5.9 + Scandinavian | 534269| 51220 | 457306 | 25743 | 9.6 | 85.6 | 4.8 + Polish | 820716| 77963 | 723226 | 19527 | 9.5 | 88.1 | 2.4 + Slovak | 345111| 32157 | 302399 | 10555 | 9.3 | 87.6 | 3.1 + Finnish | 136038| 12623 | 119771 | 3644 | 9.3 | 88.0 | 2.7 + Italian, North | 341888| 30645 | 297442 | 13801 | 9.0 | 87.0 | 4.0 + Magyar | 310049| 27312 | 270376 | 12361 | 8.8 | 87.2 | 4.0 + Lithuanian | 152544| 12004 | 137880 | 2660 | 7.9 | 90.4 | 1.7 + Irish | 401342| 20247 | 363797 | 17298 | 5.0 | 90.6 | 4.3 + Ruthenian | 119468| 5537 | 110705 | 3226 | 4.6 | 92.7 | 2.7 + Croatian and | | | | | | | + Slovenian | 295981| 12711 | 273685 | 9585 | 4.3 | 92.5 | 3.2 + Greek | 177827| 7314 | 168250 | 2263 | 4.1 | 94.6 | 1.3 + ----------------+--------+--------+--------+-------+------+------+------- + Total[3] | 8213034|1013974 |6786506 |412554 | 12.3 | 82.6 | 5.0 + ----------------+--------+--------+--------+-------+------+------+------- + + [1] Arranged in order of highest percentage of children. + + [2] Excluding all races with an immigration below 100,000, except the + Bohemian and Moravian. + + [3] Total includes all European races. + + +TABLE XL + +SEX,[1] 1899 TO 1910, AND AGE,[2] 1899 TO 1909, OF SLAVIC AND JEWISH +IMMIGRANTS + + ------------------------+-------------+------------------------------ + |Sex--per cent| Age--per cent + Group +------+------+--------+--------+------------ + | Male |Female|Under 14|14 to 44|45 and over + ------------------------+------+------+--------+--------+------------ + Polish | 69.5 | 30.5 | 9.5 | 88.1 | 2.4 + Ruthenian | 74.4 | 25.6 | 4.6 | 92.7 | 2.7 + Russian | 85.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 90.0 | 2.5 + Slovak | 70.5 | 29.5 | 9.3 | 87.6 | 3.1 + Croatian and Slovenian | 84.9 | 15.1 | 4.3 | 92.5 | 3.2 + Bohemian and | | | | | + Moravian | 57.0 | 43.0 | 20.7 | 73.6 | 5.8 + Jewish | 56.6 | 43.4 | 24.8 | 69.8 | 5.4 + ------------------------+------+------+--------+--------+------------ + + [1] From _Statistical Review of Immigration_, p. 49. + + [2] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 25. + + +TABLE XLI + +A. SEX OF ROUMANIAN IMMIGRANTS,[1] 1899 TO 1910, AND OF IMMIGRANTS +FROM ROUMANIA,[2] 1900 TO 1910 + + ----------------+------------------------------------------------ + | | Number | Per cent + Group | Total +---------+----------+--------+-------- + | | Male | Female | Male | Female + ----------------+---------+---------+----------+--------+-------- + From Roumania | 59467 | 31968 | 27499 | 53.8 | 46.2 + Roumanian | 82704 | 75238 | 7466 | 91.0 | 9.0 + ----------------+---------+---------+----------+--------+-------- + +B. AGE OF JEWISH AND ROUMANIAN IMMIGRANTS[3] 1899 TO 1909 + + -----------+--------+--------------------+------------------------ + | | Number | Per cent + Race | Total +------+------+------+-------+-------+-------- + | Number | Under| 14 to|45 and| Under | 14 to | 45 and + | | 14 | 44 | over | 14 | 44 | over + -----------+--------+------+------+------+-------+-------+-------- + Jewish | 990182 |245787|690794| 53601| 24.8 | 69.8 | 5.4 + Roumanian | 68505 | 1476| 63997| 3032| 2.2 | 93.4 | 4.4 + -----------+--------+------+------+------+-------+-------+-------- + + [1] From _Statistical Review of Emigration_, pp. 44-48. + + [2] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 23. + + [3] _Ibid._, p. 25. + + +TABLE XLII + +SEX AND AGE OF "OLD" AND "NEW" IMMIGRATION (JEWISH EXCEPTED), AND OF +JEWISH IMMIGRATION, 1899 TO 1909[1] + + ---------------------+-------+---------------+------------------------ + | | Sex--per cent | Age--per cent + Group | +------+--------+-------+-------+-------- + | Total | | | Under | 14 to | 45 and + | | Male | Female | 14 | 44 | over + ---------------------+-------+------+--------+-------+-------+-------- + Old immigration |2273782| 58.5 | 41.5 | 12.8 | 80.4 | 6.8 + New immigration | | | | | | + (Jewish excepted) |4949070| 76.3 | 23.7 | 9.7 | 86.2 | 4.1 + Jewish immigration | 990182| 56.7 | 43.3 | 24.8 | 69.8 | 5.4 + ---------------------+-------+------+--------+-------+-------+-------- + + [1] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, pp. 23-26. + + +TABLE XLIII + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION AND EMIGRATION, 1908 TO 1912[1] + + --------+-----------+-----------+--------------- + | Jewish | Jewish | Number + Year | immigrant | emigrant | departed per + | aliens[2] | aliens[3] | 100 admitted + --------+-----------+-----------+--------------- + 1908 | 103387 | 7702 | 7 + 1909 | 57551 | 6105 | 10 + 1910 | 84260 | 5689 | 6 + 1911 | 91223 | 6401 | 7 + 1912 | 80595 | 7418 | 9 + --------+-----------+-----------+--------------- + Total | 417016 | 33315 | 8 + --------+-----------+-----------+--------------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + [2] See note, page 93. + + [3] Emigrant aliens are aliens whose permanent residence has been in + the United States and who intend to reside permanently abroad. + + +TABLE XLIV + +TOTAL AND JEWISH EMIGRANT ALIENS AND PERCENTAGE JEWISH IMMIGRANT +ALIENS OF TOTAL IMMIGRANT ALIENS, 1908 TO 1912[1] + + -------+---------------------------+------------------------------ + | Emigrant aliens | Immigrant aliens + +--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+---------- + Year | Total | Jewish |Per cent.| Total | Jewish |Per cent. + |emigrant|emigrant|Jewish of|immigrant|immigrant|Jewish of + | aliens | aliens | total | aliens | aliens | total + -------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+---------- + 1908 | 381044 | 7702 | 2.0 | 782870 | 103387 | 13.2 + 1909 | 225802 | 6105 | 2.7 | 751876 | 57551 | 7.7 + 1910 | 202436 | 5689 | 2.8 | 1041570 | 84260 | 8.1 + 1911 | 295666 | 6401 | 2.1 | 878587 | 91223 | 10.4 + 1912 | 333262 | 7418 | 2.2 | 838172 | 80595 | 9.5 + -------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+---------- + Total | 1438210| 33315 | 2.3 | 4293075 | 417016 | 9.7 + -------+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------+---------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE XLV + +EUROPEAN IMMIGRANT ALIENS ADMITTED[1] AND EUROPEAN EMIGRANT ALIENS +DEPARTED, 1908, 1909 AND 1910[2] + + -----------------+-----------------+------------------------------- + |Immigrant aliens | Emigrant aliens departed + | admitted | + +--------+--------+--------+--------+------------- + People | |Per cent| |Per cent| Number + | Number |of total| Number |of total| departed + | |admitted| |departed| for every + | | | | |100 admitted + -----------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+------------- + Jewish | 236100 | 10.2 | 18543 | 2.5 | 8 + Croatian and | | | | | + Slovenian | 78658 | 3.4 | 44316 | 5.2 | 56 + English | 101611 | 4.4 | 11152 | 1.5 | 11 + German | 192644 | 8.3 | 35823 | 5.0 | 19 + Greek | 86257 | 3.7 | 21196 | 2.9 | 25 + Irish | 93090 | 4.0 | 5728 | .8 | 6 + Italian, North | 77661 | 3.3 | 47870 | 6.7 | 62 + Italian, South | 457414 | 19.8 | 255188 | 35.7 | 56 + Lithuanian | 51129 | 2.2 | 7185 | 1.0 | 14 + Magyar | 78910 | 3.4 | 50597 | 7.1 | 64 + Polish | 269646 | 11.7 | 82080 | 11.4 | 30 + Ruthenian | 55106 | 2.3 | 6681 | .9 | 12 + Scandinavian | 113786 | 4.8 | 11193 | 1.5 | 10 + Slovak | 70717 | 3.0 | 41383 | 5.8 | 59 + -----------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+------------- + Total[3] |2297338 | | 713356 | | 32 + -----------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+------------- + + [1] All peoples with an inward movement of less than 50,000 excluded. + + [2] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 41. + + [3] Total for all races, including Syrians. + + +TABLE XLVI + +JEWISH IMMIGRATION AND EMIGRATION, RUSSIA, AUSTRIA-HUNGARY AND +ROUMANIA, 1908 TO 1912[1] + + ---------+--------------------------------------------+ + | Russia | + +-------------+------------+-----------------+ + | Immigrant | Emigrant | Number departed | + Year | aliens | aliens | per 100 admitted| + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + 1908 | 71978 | 5439 | 7 | + 1909 | 39150 | 3989 | 10 | + 1910 | 59824 | 3295 | 5 | + 1911 | 65472 | 3375 | 5 | + 1912 | 58389 | 4448 | 7 | + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + Total | 294813 | 20546 | 7 | + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + ---------+--------------------------------------------+ + | Austria-Hungary | + +-------------+------------+-----------------+ + | Immigrant | Emigrant | Number departed | + Year | aliens | aliens | per 100 admitted| + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + 1908 | 15293 | 1758 | 11 | + 1909 | 8431 | 1398 | 16 | + 1910 | 13142 | 1409 | 10 | + 1911 | 12785 | 1827 | 14 | + 1912 | 10757 | 2121 | 19 | + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + Total | 60408 | 8513 | 14 | + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + ---------+--------------------------------------------- + | Roumania + +-------------+------------+-----------------+ + | Immigrant | Emigrant | Number departed | + Year | aliens | aliens | per 100 admitted| + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + 1908 | 4455 | 158 | 3 + 1909 | 1390 | 87 | 6 + 1910 | 1701 | 101 | 6 + 1911 | 2188 | 78 | 3 + 1912 | 1512 | 122 | 8 + ---------+-------------+------------+------------------ + Total | 11246 | 546 | 5 + ---------+-------------+------------+------------------ + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE XLVII + +POLISH IMMIGRATION AND EMIGRATION, RUSSIA AND AUSTRIA-HUNGARY, 1908 TO +1912[1] + + ---------+--------------------------------------------+ + | Russian Poles | + +-------------+------------+-----------------+ + | Immigrant | Emigrant | Number departed | + Year | aliens | aliens | per 100 admitted| + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + 1908 | 73122 | 18187 | 25 | + 1909 | 37770 | 8421 | 22 | + 1910 | 63635 | 6705 | 10 | + 1911 | 40193 | 12276 | 30 | + 1912 | 51244 | 14701 | 28 | + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + Total | 265964 | 60290 | 22 | + ---------+-------------+------------+-----------------+ + ---------+--------------------------------------------+ + | Austro-Hungarian Poles + +-------------+------------+------------------ + | Immigrant | Emigrant | Number departed + Year | aliens | aliens | per 100 admitted + ---------+-------------+------------+------------------ + 1908 | 59719 | 28048 | 47 + 1909 | 336483 | 10292 | 28 + 1910 | 60565 | 9609 | 15 + 1911 | 27515 | 18499 | 67 + 1912 | 30649 | 22546 | 73 + ---------+-------------+------------+------------------ + Total | 214931 | 88994 | 41 + ---------+-------------+------------+------------------ + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE XLVIII + +"OLD" AND "NEW" (JEWISH EXCEPTED) AND JEWISH IMMIGRATION AND +EMIGRATION, 1908 TO 1910[1] + + ---------------------------+-----------+----------+-------------- + | Immigrant | Emigrant | Number + Class | aliens | aliens | departed per + | | | 100 admitted + ---------------------------+-----------+----------+-------------- + Old Immigration | 599732 | 79664 | 13 + New immigration (Jewish | | | + excepted) | 1461506 | 615549 | 42 + Jewish immigration | 236100 | 18543 | 8 + ---------------------------+-----------+----------+-------------- + Total | 2297338 | 713356 | 32 + ---------------------------+-----------+----------+-------------- + + [1] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 42. + + +TABLE XLIX + +EUROPEAN IMMIGRANT ALIENS,[1] 1907, AND EUROPEAN EMIGRANT ALIENS, +1908[2] + + -----------------+---------------------+---------------------------- + | Immigrant aliens | Emigrant aliens, 1908 + | 1907 | + +-----------+---------+--------+---------+-------- + People | | | | | Number + | Number |Per cent.| Number |Per cent.|departed + | | of total| | of total| per 100 + | | | | |admitted + -----------------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+--------- + Jewish | 149182 | 12.1 | 7702 | 2.0 | 5 + Bulgarian, | 27174 | 2.2 | 5965 | 1.6 | 22 + Servian and | | | | | + Montenegrin | | | | | + Croatian and | | | | | + Slovenian | 47826 | 3.9 | 28584 | 7.5 | 60 + English | 51126 | 4.1 | 5320 | 1.4 | 10 + German | 92936 | 7.5 | 14418 | 3.8 | 15 + Greek | 46283 | 3.7 | 6763 | 1.8 | 14 + Irish | 38706 | 3.1 | 2441 | .6 | 6 + Italian, North | 1564 | 4.2 | 19507 | 5.1 | 37 + Italian, South | 242497 | 19.6 | 147828 | 38.8 | 60 + Lithuanian | 25884 | 2.1 | 3388 | .9 | 13 + Magyar | 60071 | 4.9 | 29276 | 7.7 | 48 + Polish | 138033 | 11.2 | 46727 | 12.3 | 33 + Scandinavian | 53425 | 4.3 | 5801 | 1.5 | 11 + Slovak | 42041 | 3.4 | 23573 | 6.2 | 56 + -----------------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+--------- + Total | 1237341[3]| | 381044 | | 32 + -----------------+-----------+---------+--------+---------+--------- + + [1] All peoples with an inward movement of less than 25,000 omitted. + + [2] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, pp. 39-40. + + [3] All European immigrants, including Syrians. + + +TABLE L + +TOTAL EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS ADMITTED[1] AND TOTAL OF THOSE ADMITTED +DURING THIS PERIOD IN THE UNITED STATES PREVIOUSLY, 1899 TO 1910[2] + + --------------------------+----------+----------------------- + | | In United States + | | previously + People | Number |---------+------------- + | admitted | | Per cent of + | | Number | admitted + --------------------------+----------+---------+------------- + Jewish | 1074442 | 22914 | 2.1 + Bohemian and Moravian | 100189 | 4066 | 4.1 + Croatian and Slovenian | 355542 | 43037 | 12.8 + English | 408614 | 103828 | 25.4 + Finnish | 151774 | 17189 | 11.3 + French | 115783 | 33859 | 29.2 + German | 754375 | 86458 | 11.5 + Greek | 216962 | 12283 | 5.7 + Irish | 439742 | 80636 | 18.3 + Italian, North | 372668 | 56738 | 15.2 + Italian, South | 1911933 | 262508 | 13.7 + Lithuanian | 175258 | 6186 | 3.5 + Magyar | 337351 | 39785 | 11.8 + Polish | 949064 | 65155 | 6.9 + Ruthenian | 147375 | 18492 | 12.5 + Scandinavian | 586306 | 86700 | 14.8 + Scotch | 136842 | 27684 | 20.2 + Slovak | 377527 | 71889 | 19.0 + --------------------------+----------+---------+------------- + Total[3] | 9220066 | 1108948 | 12.0 + --------------------------+----------+---------+------------- + + [1] All peoples with an immigration below 100,000 omitted. + + [2] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 51. + + [3] Includes all European peoples entered and Syrians. + + +TABLE LI + +OCCUPATIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + -------------------+-----------+------------ + Group | Number | Per cent + -------------------+-----------+------------ + No occupation | 484175 | 45.1 + Skilled laborers | 395823 | 36.8 + Professional | 7455 | .7 + Miscellaneous | 186989 | 17.4 + -------------------+-----------+------------ + Total | 1074442 | 100.0 + -------------------+-----------+------------ + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE LII + +JEWISH IMMIGRANTS REPORTING OCCUPATIONS, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + -------------------------+----------+------------ + Group | Number | Per cent + -------------------------+----------+------------ + Professional | 7455 | 1.3 + Skilled laborers | 395823 | 67.1 + Laborers | 69444 | 11.8 + Merchants and dealers | 31491 | 5.3 + Farm laborers | 11460 | 1.9 + Farmers | 1008 | .2 + Miscellaneous | 8051 | 1.3 + -------------------------+----------+------------ + Total | 590267 | 100.0 + -------------------------+----------+------------ + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE LIII + +JEWISH IMMIGRANTS ENGAGED IN PROFESSIONAL OCCUPATIONS[1] + + -------------------------------------+--------- + Occupation | Number + -------------------------------------+--------- + Actors | 232 + Architects | 108 + Clergymen | 350 + Editors | 84 + Electricians | 359 + Engineers | 484 + Lawyers | 34 + Literary and scientific persons | 385 + Musicians | 1624 + Officials (gov.) | 18 + Physicians | 290 + Sculptors and artists | 357 + Teachers | 2192 + Others | 938 + -------------------------------------+--------- + Total | 7455 + -------------------------------------+--------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE LIV + +JEWISH IMMIGRANTS REPORTING SKILLED OCCUPATIONS, 1899 TO 1910[1] + +A. _Principal skilled occupations_ + + -----------------------------------+----------+------------ + | | Per cent + Occupation | Number | of total + | | skilled + -----------------------------------+----------+------------ + Tailors | 145272 | 36.6 + Carpenters, joiners, etc.[2] | 40901 | 10.3 + Dressmakers and seamstresses[2] | 39482 | 10.0 + Shoemakers | 23519 | 5.9 + Clerks and accountants | 17066 | 4.3 + Painters and glaziers | 16387 | 4.1 + Butchers | 11413 | 2.9 + Bakers | 10925 | 2.8 + Locksmiths | 9385 | 2.4 + Blacksmiths | 8517 | 2.2 + -----------------------------------+----------+------------ + Total | 322867 | 81.5 + -----------------------------------+----------+------------ + +B. _Other skilled occupations_ + + --------------------------------------------------+-----------+-------- + Occupation | Number | + --------------------------------------------------+-----------+-------- + Tinners | 6967 | + Watch and clockmakers | 4444 | + Tobacco workers | 4350 | + Hat and capmakers | 4070 | + Barbers and hairdressers | 4054 | + Weavers and spinners | 3971 | + Tanners and curriers | 3715 | + Furriers and fur workers | 3144 | + Bookbinders | 3009 | + Masons | 2507 | + Plumbers | 2455 | + Saddlers and harness makers | 2311 | + Milliners | 2291 | + Metal workers (other than iron, steel and tin) | 2231 | + Machinists | 1907 | + Jewelers | 1837 | + Millers | 1390 | + Mechanics (not specified) | 1203 | + Upholsterers | 1109 | + Photographers | 1013 | + Iron and steel workers | 604 | + Textile workers (not specified) | 436 | + Others | 13938 | + --------------------------------------------------+-----------+-------- + Total | 72956 | + +-----------+ + Grand total | 395823 | + --------------------------------------------------+-----------+-------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + [2] Seamstresses are included with dressmakers; cabinetmakers and + woodworkers (not specified) with carpenters and joiners. + + +TABLE LV + +OCCUPATIONS OF TOTAL EUROPEAN AND JEWISH IMMIGRANTS, 1899 TO 1909, AND +PERCENTAGE JEWISH OF TOTAL[1] + + --------------------+------------+------------+---------- + Group | Total | Jewish |Per cent + | immigrants | immigrants |of total + --------------------+------------+------------+---------- + Professional | 803222 | 6836 | 8.5 + Skilled laborers | 1247674 | 362936 | 29.1 + Farm laborers | 1290295 | 9633 | 0.1 + Farmers | 841466 | 908 | 1.1 + Common laborers | 2282565 | 66311 | 2.9 + Servants | 890093 | 61611 | 6.9 + No occupation | 2165287 | 445728 | 20.6 + Miscellaneous | 172652 | 36219 | 21.0 + --------------------+------------+------------+---------- + Total | 8213034 | 990182 | 12.1 + --------------------+------------+------------+---------- + + [1] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 27. + + +TABLE LVI + +TOTAL EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS[1] AND IMMIGRANTS WITHOUT OCCUPATION, 1899 +TO 1910[2] + + --------------------------+-----------+------------------+--------- + | Total |Without occupation|Per cent + People |Immigrants | (including women | of + | | and children) | total + --------------------------+-----------+------------------+--------- + Jewish | 1074442 | 484175 | 45.1 + Bohemian and Moravian | 100189 | 39700 | 39.5 + Croatian and Slovenian | 355542 | 37219 | 11.1 + English | 408614 | 158616 | 38.8 + Finnish | 151774 | 28766 | 18.9 + French | 115783 | 45745 | 39.5 + German | 745375 | 296082 | 39.7 + Greek | 216962 | 19244 | 8.9 + Irish | 439724 | 63456 | 14.4 + Italian, North | 372668 | 76046 | 20.4 + Italian, South | 1911933 | 440274 | 23.0 + Lithuanian | 175258 | 33718 | 19.2 + Magyar | 338151 | 78875 | 23.3 + Polish | 949064 | 200634 | 21.1 + Ruthenian | 147375 | 18915 | 12.9 + Scandinavian | 586306 | 111212 | 18.9 + Scotch | 136842 | 47634 | 34.9 + Slovak | 377527 | 87280 | 23.1 + --------------------------+-----------+------------------+--------- + Total | 9555673[3]| 2506713 | 26.2 + --------------------------+-----------+------------------+--------- + + [1] All races with an immigration below 100,000 omitted. + + [2] From _Statistical Review of Immigration_, p. 52. + + [3] Total includes all races. + + +TABLE LVII + +OCCUPATIONS OF EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS[1] REPORTING EMPLOYMENT, 1899 TO +1910[2] + + ----------------+----------+-------------------------------------------- + | | Per cent + | +------------+-----------+---------+--------- + | | | |Laborers,| + | Number |In | |including| + | reporting|professional|In skilled |farm |Miscell- + People |employment|occupations |occupations|laborers |aneous + ----------------+----------+------------+-----------+---------+--------- + Jewish | 590267 | 1.3 | 67.1 | 13.7 | 18.0 + Bohemian and | | | | | + Moravia | 60489 | 1.3 | 40.8 | 28.5 | 29.4 + Bulgarian, | | | | | + Servian and | | | | | + Montenegrin | 90991 | .1 | 3.3 | 92.0 | 4.6 + Croatian and | | | | | + Slovenian | 298324 | .1 | 5.0 | 86.4 | 8.5 + English | 249908 | 9.0 | 48.7 | 14.1 | 28.1 + Finnish | 123008 | .3 | 6.0 | 67.2 | 26.5 + French | 70038 | 9.3 | 34.5 | 26.0 | 30.2 + German | 458293 | 3.5 | 30.0 | 37.7 | 28.8 + Greek | 197718 | .3 | 7.7 | 86.2 | 5.8 + Irish | 376268 | 1.3 | 12.6 | 35.2 | 50.9 + Italian, North | 296622 | 1.1 | 20.4 | 66.5 | 12.0 + Italian, South |1471659 | .4 | 14.6 | 77.0 | 7.9 + Lithuanian | 141540 | .1 | 6.7 | 76.1 | 17.2 + Magyar | 259276 | .5 | 8.6 | 77.5 | 13.4 + Polish | 748430 | .2 | 6.3 | 75.3 | 18.1 + Roumanian | 75531 | .2 | 2.7 | 93.8 | 3.3 + Russian | 69986 | 1.4 | 9.1 | 82.7 | 6.8 + Ruthenian | 128460 | .1 | 2.0 | 80.6 | 17.4 + Scandinavian | 475094 | 1.2 | 20.5 | 43.8 | 34.5 + Scotch | 89208 | 5.7 | 57.9 | 12.1 | 24.3 + Slovak | 290247 | .1 | 4.4 | 80.0 | 15.5 + ----------------+----------+------------+-----------+---------+--------- + Total |7048953[3]| 1.4 | 20.2 | 79.3 | 19.1 + ----------------+----------+------------+-----------+---------+--------- + + [1] All races with an immigration below 50,000 omitted. + + [2] From _Statistical Review of Immigration_, p. 53. + + [3] Total includes all races. + + +TABLE LVIII + +OCCUPATIONS OF SLAVIC AND JEWISH IMMIGRANTS REPORTING EMPLOYMENT, 1899 +TO 1910[1] + + ---------------+-----------+-------------------------------------------- + | | Per cent + | +------------+-----------+----------+-------- + | | | | Common | + People | | | | laborers |Miscel- + | No. |In |In |(including|laneous + | reporting |professional|skilled | farm | + |occupations|occupations |occupations| laborers)| + ---------------+-----------+------------+-----------+----------+-------- + Jewish | 590267 | 1.3 | 67.1 | 13.7 | 18.0 + Bohemian and | | | | | + Moravian | 60489 | 1.3 | 40.8 | 28.5 | 29.4 + Bulgarian, | | | | | + Servian and | | | | | + Montenegrin | 90991 | .1 | 3.3 | 92.0 | 4.6 + Croatian and | | | | | + Slovenian | 298324 | .1 | 5.0 | 86.4 | 8.5 + Polish | 748430 | .2 | 6.3 | 75.3 | 18.1 + Russian | 69986 | 1.4 | 9.1 | 82.7 | 6.8 + Ruthenian | 128460 | .1 | 2.0 | 80.6 | 17.4 + Slovak | 290247 | .1 | 4.4 | 80.0 | 15.5 + ---------------+-----------+------------+-----------+----------+-------- + + [1] From _Statistical Review of Immigration_, p. 53. + + +TABLE LIX + +OCCUPATIONS OF "OLD" AND "NEW" IMMIGRATION (JEWISH EXCEPTED) AND OF +JEWISH IMMIGRATION, 1899 TO 1909[1] + + ------------------+-----------------+-----------------+----------------- + | |"New" immigration| Jewish + |"Old" immigration|(Jewish excepted)| immigration + Occupations +-------+---------+-------+---------+-------+--------- + | Number| Per cent| Number| Per cent| Number| Per cent + ------------------+-------+---------+-------+---------+-------+--------- + Professional | 56406| 2.5 | 17080| .3 | 6836| .7 + Skilled laborers | 442754| 19.5 | 441984| 8.9 | 362936| 36.7 + Farm laborers | 138598| 6.1 |1142064| 23.1 | 9633| 1.0 + Farmers | 40633| 1.8 | 42605| .9 | 908| .1 + Common laborers | 402074| 17.7 |1814180| 36.7 | 66311| 6.7 + Servants | 424698| 18.7 | 403784| 8.2 | 61611| 6.2 + No occupation | 678510| 29.8 |1041049| 21.0 | 445728| 45.0 + Miscellaneous | 90109| 4.0 | 46324| .9 | 36219| 3.7 + ------------------+-------+---------+-------+---------+-------+--------- + Total |2273782| 100.0 |4949070| 100.0 | 990182| 100.0 + ------------------+-------+---------+-------+---------+-------+--------- + + [1] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 29. + + +TABLE LX + +ILLITERACY OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + ---------+-----------------+-----------------------+----------- + |Jewish immigrants| Jewish immigrant | Per cent + Year | 14 years of age |illiterates[2] 14 years|illiterate + | and over | of age and over | + ---------+-----------------+-----------------------+----------- + 1899 | 28428 | 5637 | 19.5 + 1900 | 47672 | 10607 | 22.2 + 1901 | 43367 | 10119 | 23.3 + 1902 | 42376 | 11921 | 28.1 + 1903 | 57159 | 14980 | 26.2 + 1904 | 82707 | 18763 | 22.6 + 1905 | 101357 | 22770 | 22.4 + 1906 | 110128 | 29444 | 26.7 + 1907 | 111486 | 31885 | 28.6 + 1908 | 77374 | 23217 | 30.3 + 1909 | 42341 | 12201 | 28.8 + 1910 | 62391 | 17963 | 28.8 + ---------+-----------------+-----------------------+----------- + Total | 806786 | 209507 | 26.0 + ---------+-----------------+-----------------------+----------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + [2] Those who could neither read nor write. + + +TABLE LXI + +SEX OF JEWISH IMMIGRANT ILLITERATES, 1908 TO 1912[1] + + ---------+---------------------+----------------------------------- + | | Jewish immigrant illiterates + | Jewish immigrants | 14 years of age and over + | 14 years of age |-----------------+----------------- + Year | and over | Number | Per cent + |----------+----------+--------+--------+--------+-------- + | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female + ---------+----------+----------+--------+--------+--------+-------- + 1908 | 43270 | 34104 | 9455 | 13762 | 21.9 | 40.4 + 1909 | 23452 | 18889 | 4832 | 7369 | 20.6 | 39.0 + 1910 | 35272 | 27120 | 7593 | 10370 | 21.5 | 38.2 + 1911 | 38018 | 31370 | 6453 | 10304 | 16.9 | 32.8 + 1912 | 32706 | 27799 | 5637 | 9498 | 17.2 | 34.2 + ---------+----------+----------+--------+--------+--------+-------- + Total | 172718 | 139282 | 33970 | 51303 | 19.7 | 36.8 + ---------+----------+----------+--------+--------+--------+-------- + + [1] In order to ascertain the number of males and females, 14 years + of age and over, the number of Jewish immigrants under 14 years + of age were distributed equally between the sexes. Subtracting + these respectively from the number of males and females, we + obtain the above totals. Cf. _Report of New York State + Commission on Immigration_, 1908, p. 171. + + +TABLE LXII + +ILLITERACY OF EUROPEAN IMMIGRANTS,[1] 1899 to 1910[2] + + ------------------------+---------------+--------------------------- + | | Immigrant illiterates 14 + | Immigrants 14 | years of age and over + People | years of age +-------------+------------- + | and over | Number | Per cent + ------------------------+---------------+-------------+------------- + Jewish | 806786 | 209507 | 26.0 + Bohemian and Moravian | 79721 | 1322 | 1.7 + Croatian and Slovenian | 320977 | 115785 | 36.1 + English | 347458 | 3647 | 1.0 + Finnish | 137916 | 1745 | 1.3 + German | 625793 | 32236 | 5.2 + Greek | 208608 | 55089 | 26.4 + Irish | 416640 | 10721 | 2.6 + Italian, North | 339301 | 38897 | 11.5 + Italian, South | 1690376 | 911566 | 53.9 + Lithuanian | 161441 | 79001 | 48.9 + Magyar | 307082 | 35004 | 11.4 + Polish | 861303 | 304675 | 35.4 + Ruthenian | 140775 | 75165 | 53.4 + Scandinavian | 530634 | 2221 | .4 + Scotch | 115788 | 767 | .7 + Slovak | 342583 | 82216 | 24.0 + ------------------------+---------------+-------------+------------- + Total[3] | 8398624 | 2238801 | 26.7 + ------------------------+---------------+-------------+------------- + + [1] All peoples with an immigration below 100,000 excluded, except + the Bohemian and Moravian. + + [2] From _Statistical Review of Immigration_, p. 51. + + [3] Total for all races. + + +TABLE LXIII + +ILLITERACY OF "OLD" AND "NEW" IMMIGRATION (JEWISH EXCEPTED) AND OF +JEWISH IMMIGRATION, 1899 TO 1909[1] + + ---------------------+-----------------+--------------------------- + | | Immigrant illiterates 14 + | Immigrants 14 | years of age and over + Classed | years of age +------------+-------------- + | and over | Number | Per cent + ---------------------+-----------------+------------+-------------- + Old immigration | 1983618 | 52833 | 2.7 + New immigration | | | + (Jewish excepted) | 4471047 | 1667754 | 37.3 + Jewish immigration | 744395 | 191544 | 25.7 + ---------------------+-----------------+------------+-------------- + Total | 7199060 | 1912131 | 26.6 + ---------------------+-----------------+------------+-------------- + + [1] From _Emigration Conditions in Europe_, p. 30. + + +TABLE LXIV + +ILLITERACY OF PEOPLES FROM EASTERN EUROPE, 1899 TO 1910[1] + + ---------------------+-----------------+------------------------- + | Immigrants 14 | Illiterates + People | years of age +------------+------------ + | and over | Number | Per cent. + ---------------------+-----------------+------------+------------ + Jewish | 806786 | 209507 | 26.0 + Lithuanian | 161441 | 79001 | 48.9 + Polish | 861303 | 304675 | 35.4 + Russian | 77479 | 29777 | 38.4 + Ruthenian | 140775 | 75165 | 63.4 + ---------------------+-----------------+------------+------------ + [1] From _Statistical Review of Immigration_, p. 51. + + +TABLE LXV + +SEX OF ILLITERATES OF PEOPLES FROM EASTERN EUROPE, 1908[1] + + ---------------+-----------------------+--------------------- + | Number illiterates 14 | Per cent. + | years and over | + Race +-----------+-----------+----------+---------- + | Male | Female | Male | Female + ---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+---------- + Jewish | 9455 | 13762 | 21.9 | 40.4 + Lithuanian | 4215 | 2897 | 53.4 | 63.4 + Polish | 14573 | 8813 | 36.7 | 42.9 + Russian | 5820 | 828 | 40.1 | 50.8 + Ruthenian | 4203 | 1836 | 49.6 | 57.4 + ---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+---------- + + [1] From _Report of New York State Commission on Immigration_, + 1908, p. 171. + + +TABLE LXVI + +DESTINATION OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS, 1899 TO 1910, BY DIVISION[1] + + --------------------------+-------------------+---------- + Division | Jewish immigrants | Per cent + --------------------------+-------------------+---------- + North Atlantic States | 923549 | 86.0 + North Central States | 110998 | 10.3 + South Atlantic States | 25149 | 2.3 + South Central States | 8324 | .8 + Western States | 6384 | .6 + --------------------------+-------------------+---------- + Total | 1074404[2] | 100.0 + --------------------------+-------------------+---------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + [2] 27 were destined for Alaska, Hawaii, and Porto Rico, and 11 were + tourists. + + +TABLE LXVII + +DESTINATION OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS, 1899 to 1910, BY PRINCIPAL STATES + + ----------------+-------------------+------------------- + State | Jewish immigrants | Per cent of total + ----------------+-------------------+------------------- + New York | 690296 | 64.2 + Pennsylvania | 108534 | 10.1 + Massachusetts | 66023 | 6.1 + Illinois | 59931 | 4.7 + New Jersey | 31279 | 3.2 + Ohio | 20531 | 1.9 + Maryland | 18700 | 1.7 + Connecticut | 16254 | 1.5 + Missouri | 12476 | 1.2 + Minnesota | 7029 | .7 + Wisconsin | 6369 | .6 + Michigan | 5970 | .6 + Rhode Island | 5023 | .5 + All others | 31989 | 3.0 + ----------------+-------------------+------------------- + Total | 1074404[1] | 100.0 + ----------------+-------------------+------------------- + + [1] _Cf._ note 2 of table LXVI. + +TABLE LXVIII + +PERCENTAGE OF JEWISH AND TOTAL IMMIGRANTS DESTINED FOR EACH DIVISION, +1899 TO 1910[1] + + -----------------------+------------------+------------------- + Division | Per cent of | Per cent of + | total immigrants | Jewish immigrants + -----------------------+------------------+------------------- + South Atlantic States | 67.5 | 86.0 + North Central States | 22.4 | 10.3 + South Atlantic States | 2.7 | 2.3 + South Central States | 1.8 | .8 + Western | 5.6 | .6 + -----------------------+------------------+------------------- + Total | 100.0 | 100.0 + -----------------------+------------------+------------------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + +TABLE LXIX + +PARTICIPATION OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS IN DESTINATION OF TOTAL IMMIGRANTS, +1899 TO 1910, BY DIVISION + + -----------------+--------------+-------------+----------------- + Division | Total | Jewish | Per cent + | immigrants | immigrants | Jewish of total + -----------------+--------------+-------------+----------------- + North Atlantic | 6368243 | 923549 | 14.5 + North Central | 2116327 | 110998 | 5.2 + South Atlantic | 254936 | 25149 | 9.9 + South Central | 167437 | 8324 | 5.0 + Western | 532824 | 6384 | 1.2 + -----------------+--------------+-------------+----------------- + Total | 9439757 | 1074404[2] | 11.4 + -----------------+--------------+-------------+----------------- + + [1] From _Reports of Commissioner-General of Immigration_. + + [2] _Cf._ note 2 of table LXVI. + + + + +APPENDICES + + + + +APPENDIX A. + +PRESIDENT HARRISON'S MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, DECEMBER 9, 1891.[141] + + +This Government has found occasion to express in a friendly spirit, +but with much earnestness, to the Government of the Czar its concern +because of the harsh measures now being enforced against the Hebrews +in Russia. By the revival of antisemitic laws, long in abeyance, great +numbers of those unfortunate people have been constrained to abandon +their homes and leave the Empire by reason of the impossibility of +finding subsistence within the pale to which it is sought to confine +them. The immigration of these people to the United States--many other +countries being closed to them--is largely increasing and is likely to +assume proportions which may make it difficult to find homes and +employment for them here and to seriously affect the labor market. It +is estimated that over 1,000,000 will be forced from Russia in a few +years. The Hebrew is never a beggar; he has always kept the law--life +by toil--often under severe and oppressive civil restrictions. It is +also true that no race, set or class has more fully cared for its own +than the Hebrew race. But the sudden transfer of such a multitude +under conditions that tend to strip them of their small accumulations +and to depress their energies and courage is neither good for them nor +for us. + +The banishment, whether by direct decree or by not less certain +indirect methods, of so large a number of men and women is not a local +question. A decree to leave one country is in the nature of things an +order to enter another--some other. This consideration, as well as the +suggestion of humanity, furnishes ample ground for the remonstrances +which we have presented to Russia, while our historic friendship for +that government can not fail to give assurance that our +representations are those of a sincere wellwisher. + +FOOTNOTES: + +[141] (_Messages and Papers of the Presidents_, 1789-1897, vol. ix, +1889-97, p. 188. Washington, 1898). + + + + +APPENDIX B. + +ARTICLE VII OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ROUMANIA. + + +Difference in religious beliefs and confessions does not constitute in +Roumania an obstacle to the obtainment of civil and political rights, +nor to the exercise of these rights. + +(1) A foreigner without distinction of religion, and whether a subject +or not of a foreign government, can become naturalized under the +following conditions: + +(a) He shall address to the government an application for +naturalization, in which he shall indicate the capital he possesses, +the profession or craft which he follows, and his abode in Roumania. + +(b) He shall reside, after this application, ten years in the country, +and prove, by action, that he is of service to it. + +(2) The following may be exempted from the intermediary stages: + +(a) Those who have brought into the country industries, useful +inventions, or talent, or who have founded large establishments of +commerce or industry. + +(b) Those who, born and bred in Roumania, of parents established in +the country, have never been subjected, either themselves or their +parents, to any protection by a foreign power. + +(c) Those who have served under the colors during the war of +independence; these may be naturalized collectively by government +decree, by a single resolution, and without any further formality. + +(3) Naturalization can not be given except by law, and individually. + +(4) A special law shall determine the manner in which foreigners may +establish their home on Roumanian territory. + +(5) Only Roumanians, and those who have been naturalized Roumanians, +can buy rural estates in Roumania. + + + + +APPENDIX C. + +SECRETARY HAY'S NOTE. + + + DEPARTMENT OF STATE, } + WASHINGTON, _August 11, 1902_. } + +"Excellency:--In the course of an instruction recently sent to the +Minister accredited to the Government of Roumania in regard to the +bases of negotiation begun with that government looking to a +convention of naturalization between the United States and Roumania, +certain considerations were set forth for the Minister's guidance +concerning the character of the emigration from that country, the +causes which constrain it, and the consequences so far as they +adversely affect the United States. + +"It has seemed to the President appropriate that these considerations, +relating as they do to the obligations entered into by the signatories +of the Treaty of Berlin, of July 13, 1878, should be brought to the +attention of the Governments concerned, and commended to their +consideration in the hope that, if they are so fortunate as to meet +the approval of the several Powers, such measures as to them may seem +wise may be taken to persuade the Government of Roumania to reconsider +the subject of the grievances in question. + +"The United States welcomes now, as it has welcomed from the +foundation of its Government, the voluntary immigration of all aliens +coming hither under conditions fitting them to become merged in the +body politic of this land. Our laws provide the means for them to +become incorporated indistinguishably in the mass of citizens, and +prescribe their absolute equality with the native born, guaranteeing +to them equal civil rights at home and equal protection abroad. The +conditions are few, looking to their coming as free agents, so +circumstanced physically and morally as to supply the healthful and +intelligent material of free citizenhood. The pauper, the criminal, +the contagiously or incurably diseased are excluded from the benefits +of immigration only when they are likely to become a source of danger +or a burden upon the community. The voluntary character of their +coming is essential; hence we shut out all immigration assisted or +constrained by foreign agencies. The purpose of our generous treatment +of the alien immigrant is to benefit us and him alike--not to afford +to another state a field upon which to cast its own objectionable +elements. The alien, coming hither voluntarily and prepared to take +upon himself the preparatory and in due course the definitive +obligations of citizenship, retains thereafter, in domestic and +international relations, the initial character of free agency, in the +full enjoyment of which it is incumbent upon his adoptive State to +protect him. + +"The foregoing considerations, whilst pertinent to the examination of +the purpose and scope of a naturalization treaty, have a larger aim. +It behooves the State to scrutinize most jealously the character of +the immigration from a foreign land, and, if it be obnoxious to +objection, to examine the causes which render it so. Should those +causes originate in the act of another sovereign State, to the +detriment of its neighbors, it is the prerogative of an injured State, +to point out the evil and to make remonstrance: for with nations, as +with individuals the social law holds good, that the right of each is +bounded by the right of the neighbor. + +"The condition of a large class of the inhabitants of Roumania has for +many years been a source of grave concern to the United States. I +refer to the Roumanian Jews, numbering some 400,000. Long ago, while +the Danubian principalities labored under oppressive conditions, which +only war and a general action of European powers sufficed to end, the +persecution of the indigenous Jews under Turkish rule called forth in +1872 the strong remonstrance of the United States. The Treaty of +Berlin was hailed as a cure for the wrong, in view of the express +provisions of its forty-fourth article, prescribing that "in +Roumania, the difference of religious creeds and confessions shall not +be alleged against any person as ground for exclusion or incapacity in +matters relating to the enjoyment of civil and political rights, +admission to public employments, functions, and honors, or the +exercise of the various professions and industries in any locality +whatsoever," and stipulating freedom in the exercise of all forms of +worship to Roumanian dependents and foreigners alike, as well as +guaranteeing that all foreigners in Roumania shall be treated, without +distinction of creed, on a footing of perfect equality. + +"With the lapse of time these just prescriptions have been rendered +nugatory in great part, as regards the native Jews, by the legislation +and municipal regulations of Roumania. Starting from the arbitrary and +controvertible premise that the native Jews of Roumania domiciled +there for centuries are "aliens not subject to foreign protection," +the ability of the Jew to earn even the scanty means of existence that +suffice for a frugal race has been constricted by degrees, until +nearly every opportunity to win a livelihood is denied; and until the +helpless poverty of the Jew has constrained an exodus of such +proportions as to cause general concern. + +"The political disabilities of the Jews in Roumania, their exclusion +from the public service and the learned professions, the limitations +of their civil rights and the imposition upon them of exceptional +taxes, involving as they do wrongs repugnant to the moral sense of +liberal modern peoples, are not so directly in point for my present +purpose as the public acts which attack the inherent right of man as a +breadwinner in the ways of agriculture and trade. The Jews are +prohibited from owning land, or even from cultivating it as common +laborers. They are debarred from residing in the rural districts. Many +branches of petty trade and manual production are closed to them in +the overcrowded cities where they are forced to dwell and engage, +against fearful odds, in the desperate struggle for existence. Even as +ordinary artisans or hired laborers they may only find employment in +proportion of one "unprotected alien" to two "Roumanians" under any +one employer. In short, by the cumulative effect of successive +restrictions, the Jews of Roumania have become reduced to a state of +wretched misery. Shut out from nearly every avenue of self-support +which is open to the poor of other lands, and ground down by poverty +as the natural result of their discriminatory treatment, they are +rendered incapable of lifting themselves from the enforced degradation +they endure. Even were the fields of education, of civil employment +and of commerce open to them as to "Roumanian citizens," their penury +would prevent their rising by individual effort. Human beings so +circumstanced have virtually no alternatives but submissive suffering +or flight to some land less unfavorable to them. Removal under such +conditions is not and cannot be the healthy, intelligent emigration of +a free and self-reliant being. It must be, in most cases, the mere +transplantation of an artificially produced diseased growth to a new +place. + +"Granting that, in better and more healthful surroundings, the morbid +conditions will eventually change for good, such emigration is +necessarily for a time a burden to the community upon which the +fugitives may be cast. Self-reliance and the knowledge and ability +that evolve the power of self-support must be developed, and, at the +same time, avenues of employment must be opened in quarters where +competition is already keen and opportunities scarce. The teachings of +history and the experience of our own nation show that the Jews +possess in a high degree the mental and moral qualifications of +conscientious citizenhood. No class of immigrants is more welcome to +our shores, when coming equipped in mind and body for entrance upon +the struggle for bread, and inspired with the high purpose to give the +best service of heart and brain to the land they adopt of their own +free will. But when they come as outcasts, made doubly paupers by +physical and moral oppression in their native land, and thrown upon +the long-suffering generosity of a more favored community, their +migration lacks the essential conditions which make alien immigration +either acceptable or beneficial. So well is this appreciated on the +Continent that, even in the countries where anti-Semitism has no +foothold, it is difficult for these fleeing Jews to obtain any +lodgment. America is their only goal. + +"The United States offers asylum to the oppressed of all lands. But +its sympathy with them in no wise impairs its just liberty and right +to weigh the acts of the oppressor in the light of their effects upon +this country and to judge accordingly. + +"Putting together the facts now plainly brought home to this +Government during the past few years, that many of the inhabitants of +Roumania are being forced, by artificially adverse discriminations, to +quit their native country; that the hospitable asylum offered by this +country is almost the only refuge left to them; that they come hither +unfitted, by the conditions of their exile, to take part in the new +life of this land under circumstances either profitable to themselves +or beneficial to the community; and that they are objects of charity +from the outset and for a long time--the right of remonstrance against +the acts of the Roumanian Government is clearly established in favor +of this Government. Whether consciously and of purpose or not, these +helpless people, burdened and spurned by their native land, are forced +by the sovereign power of Roumania upon the charity of the United +States. This Government cannot be a tacit party to such an +international wrong. It is constrained to protest against the +treatment to which the Jews of Roumania are subjected, not alone +because it has unimpeachable ground to remonstrate against the +resultant injury to itself, but in the name of humanity. The United +States may not authoritatively appeal to the stipulations of the +Treaty of Berlin to which it was not and cannot become a signatory, +but it does earnestly appeal to the principles consigned therein +because they are the principles of international law and eternal +justice, advocating the broad toleration which that solemn compact +enjoins and standing ready to lend its moral support to the fulfilment +thereof by its co-signatories, for the act of Roumania itself has +effectively joined the United States to them as an interested party in +this regard. + +"You will take an early occasion to read this instruction to the +Minister for Foreign Affairs and, should he request it, leave with him +a copy. + + "I have the honor to be, + "Your obedient servant, + "JOHN HAY". + + + + +BIBLIOGRAPHY + + (All works referred to in the text are given below. A number of + other works that have been found useful are also included.) + + + Alexinsky, Gregor. _Modern Russia._ New York, Charles Scribner's + Sons, 1913. + + _Alliance Israelite Universelle_, 1870 to 1900. + + _The American Jewish Year Book._ Philadelphia, Jewish Publication + Society of America, 1900-1913. + + ---- 1913. Jewish Immigration to the United States, pp. 283-4. + + Association for the Protection of Jewish Immigrants of + Philadelphia. _Annual Reports_, 1885 to 1910. + + Balch, Emily Greene. _Our Slavic Fellow-Citizens._ New York + Charities Publication Committee, 1910. + + Bluntschli. Dr. _Roumania and the Legal Status of the Jews in + Roumania._ London, Anglo-Jewish Association, 1879. + + Buzek, Dr. Joseph. "Das Auswanderungsproblem in Oesterreich," + _Zeitschrift fuer Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und + Verwaltung_, vol. 10, 1901. + + Carmen Sylva. "Roumania and the Foreigners," _Century_, March, + 1906. + + Charmatz, Richard. _Deutsch-Oesterreichische Politik._ Leipzig, + Duncker und Humblot, 1907. + + Demidoff San Donato, Prince. _The Jewish Question in Russia._ + London, Darling & Son, 1884. + + _Die Judenpogromen in Russland._ 2 vols. Koeln, Juedischer Verlag, + 1910. + + English Royal Commission on Alien Immigration, 1904. + + _Enquete sur les Artisans--premiere partie_, Ministere de + l'Industrie et du Commerce, Royaume de Roumanie, Bucarest + 1909. + + Fairchild. _Immigration._ New York, Macmillan Co., 1913. + + Frederic, Harold. _The New Exodus._ New York, G.P. Putnam's Sons, + 1892. + + Goldberg. "Die Juden unter der staedtischer Bevoelkerung Russlands." + _Zeitschrift fuer Demographie und Statistik der Juden._ Bureau + fuer Statistik der Juden, Berlin. + + _Grenzboten_, vol. 62, 1903. (1) "Galizische Wirtschaft." (2) + "Galizien." + + Hersch, L. _Le Juif errant d'aujourd'hui._ Paris, M. Giard et E. + Briere, 1913. + + Hillman, Anselm. _Juedisches Genossenschaftswesen in Russland_, + Bureau fuer Statistik der Juden, Berlin, 1911. + + Immigration Commission. _Emigration Conditions in Europe._ Report + to 61st Congress, 2nd Session, Senate Document No. 748, + Washington, 1911. + + ---- _Conclusions and Recommendations._ + + ---- _Abstract of Emigration Conditions in Europe._ + + ---- _Abstract of Statistical Review of Immigration to the United + States, 1820-1910._ Washington, 1911. + + _Jewish Chronicle_, 1875-1910. + + _Jewish Encyclopedia._ 1. "Antisemitism." 2. "Austria." 3. + "Migration." 4. "Roumania." 5. "Russia." + + Jorga, N. _Geschichte des Rumaenischen Volkes._ 2 vols. Gotha, + Fredrich Andreas Perthes, 1905. + + Juedische Statistik, Berlin, Juedischer Verlag, 1903. + + ---- _Enquete ueber die Lage der juedischen Bevoelkerung Galiziens_, + von Dr. S. Fleischer. + + ---- _Zur Bewegung der juedischen Bevoelkerung in Galizien_, von Dr. + A. Korkis. + + Kogalniceanu, Vasile M. "Die Agrarfrage in Rumaenien." _Archiv fuer + Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik_, vol. 32, 1911. + + Kovalevsky, Maxim. _La crise russe._ V. Giard et E. Briere, Paris, + 1906. + + ---- _Russian Political Institutions._ University of Chicago + Press, 1902. + + Landa, M.J. _The Alien Problem and its Remedy._ London, P.S. King + & Son, 1911. + + _La question juive dans les Chambres roumaines._ Seconde edition. + Paris, Ch. Marechal, 1879. + + Lazare, Bernard. _Die Juden in Rumaenien._ H.S. Hermann, Berlin, + 1902. + + Leroy-Beaulieu, Anatole. _The Empire of the Tsars._ 3 vols. New + York, G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1894. + + Loeb, Isidore. _La Situation des Israelites en Turquie, en Serbie + et en Roumanie._ Paris, Joseph Baer et Cie, 1877. + + Margolin, Salomon. "Die wirtschaftliche Lage der juedischen + arbeitenden Klassen in Russland." _Archiv fuer + Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik._ Band 26, Heft I. + + Milyoukov, Paul. _Russia and its Crisis._ University of Chicago + Press, 1905. + + Palmer, Francis H.E. _Austro-Hungarian Life in Town and Country._ + New York, G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1903. + + ---- _Russian Life in Town and Country._ New York, G.P. Putnam's + Sons, 1903. + + _Persecution of the Jews in Russia_ (issued by the Russo-Jewish + committee of London). Philadelphia, Jewish Publication Society + of America, 1891. + + _Reports of the Commissioner-General of Immigration_, 1881 to + 1912. + + _Report on the Causes inciting Immigration to the United States_, + 1892. + + Rubinow, I.M. _Economic Condition of the Jews in Russia._ Bulletin + of the Bureau of Labor, Department of Commerce and Labor, + Washington, 1907. + + Ruppin, Dr. A. _Die Sozialen Verhaeltnisse der Juden in Russland._ + Berlin, Juedischer Verlag, 1906. + + ---- _Die Juden in Rumaenien._ Bureau fuer Statistik der Juden. Heft + 5. Louis Lamm, Berlin, 1908. + + ---- _The Jews of To-Day._ New York, Henry Holt & Co., 1913. + + Schulze-Gaevernitz, Dr. G. von. _Volkswirtschaftliche Studien aus + Russland._ Leipzig, 1899. + + Semenoff, E. _The Russian Government and the Jewish Massacres._ + London, John Murray, 1907. + + Simkhovitch, Valdimir G. "An Interpretation of Russian Autocracy." + _The International Quarterly_, Oct., 1904. + + Sincerus, Edmond. _Les Juifs en Roumanie._ New York, Macmillan & + Co., 1901. + + Sturdza, A.A.C. _La Terre et la Race roumaines._ Paris, Lucien + Lavens, 1904. + + Sulzberger, David. _The Beginnings of Russo-Jewish Immigration to + Philadelphia._ Publications of the American Jewish Historical + Society, No. 19, 1910. + + Thon, Dr. Jacob. _Die Juden in Oesterreich._ Bureau fuer Statistik + der Juden. Heft 4. Louis Lamm, Berlin, 1908. + + United Hebrew Charities of New York, _Annual Reports_, 1884 to + 1910. + + Urussov, Prince Serge. _Memoirs of a Russian Governor._ New York, + Harper Bros., 1908. + + Wallace, Sir Donald Mackenzie. _Russia._ 2nd edition. New York, + Henry Holt & Co., 1905. + + White, Andrew D. _Autobiography._ 2 vols. New York, Century Co., + 1905. + + Witte, S.J. _Vorlesungen ueber Volks und Staatswirtschaft._ + Stuttgart and Berlin, 1913. + + Wolf, Lucien. _The Legal Sufferings of the Jews in Russia._ + London, T. Fisher Unwin, 1912. + + + + + * * * * * + + + + + +-------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Typographical errors corrected in text: | + | | + | Page 74: acordance replaced with accordance | + | Page 75: elementay replaced with elementary | + | Page 103: Jewism replaced with Jewish | + | Page 183: Croation replaced with Croatian | + | Page 185: Croation replaced with Croatian | + | Page 187: Commissiomer replaced with Commissioner | + | Page 196: Table LXIX (2nd) North Central replaced with | + | South Central | + | | + | On page 146 the typesetter misplaced four lines of text: | + | "Out of a total | + | this country from 1899 to 1910, 209,507 or 26 per | + | of 806,786 Jews fourteen years of age and over who entered | + | cent, were unable to read and write." | + | This has been changed to read: | + | "Out of a total | + | of 806,786 Jews fourteen years of age and over who entered | + | this country from 1899 to 1910, 209,507 or 26 per | + | cent, were unable to read and write." | + | | + +-------------------------------------------------------------+ + + + +***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK JEWISH IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED +STATES FROM 1881 TO 1910*** + + +******* This file should be named 35415.txt or 35415.zip ******* + + +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: +http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/3/5/4/1/35415 + + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://www.gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/pglaf. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://www.gutenberg.org/about/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: +http://www.gutenberg.org/fundraising/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + |
