summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 20:06:15 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-14 20:06:15 -0700
commit3a34b9e81d39f49f0fd0669133c06e485b94ded9 (patch)
treec892719759efb24c99e1757495a1e3154dddc1c9
initial commit of ebook 36653HEADmain
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes3
-rw-r--r--36653-8.txt1395
-rw-r--r--36653-8.zipbin0 -> 22645 bytes
-rw-r--r--36653-h.zipbin0 -> 100972 bytes
-rw-r--r--36653-h/36653-h.htm2417
-rw-r--r--36653-h/images/decoration.pngbin0 -> 3413 bytes
-rw-r--r--36653-h/images/p005.jpgbin0 -> 44739 bytes
-rw-r--r--36653-h/images/p011.jpgbin0 -> 30783 bytes
-rw-r--r--36653.txt1395
-rw-r--r--36653.zipbin0 -> 22630 bytes
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
12 files changed, 5223 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6833f05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+* text=auto
+*.txt text
+*.md text
diff --git a/36653-8.txt b/36653-8.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d6b2293
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36653-8.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1395 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas,
+[KU. Vol. 1 No. 11], by Bernardo Villa-R and E. Raymond Hall
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas, [KU. Vol. 1 No. 11]
+
+Author: Bernardo Villa-R
+ E. Raymond Hall
+
+Release Date: July 7, 2011 [EBook #36653]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK POCKET GOPHERS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Matthew Wheaton
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ SUBSPECIATION IN POCKET GOPHERS OF KANSAS
+
+ By BERNARDO VILLA-R. and E. RAYMOND HALL
+
+
+ University of Kansas Publications
+ Museum of Natural History
+
+ Volume 1, No. 11, pp. 217-236
+ November 29, 1947
+
+ UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
+ LAWRENCE
+ 1947
+
+ UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS, MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
+ Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, H. H. Lane, and Edward H. Taylor
+ Volume 1, No. 11, pp. 217-236
+ Published November 29, 1947
+
+ UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
+ Lawrence, Kansas
+
+ PRINTED BY
+ FRED VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER
+ TOPEKA, KANSAS
+ 1947
+
+ 21-8188
+
+
+
+
+Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas
+
+By BERNARDO VILLA-R. AND E. RAYMOND HALL
+
+
+Several full species of the genus _Geomys_ have been recorded from
+Kansas. The purpose of the study now reported upon was to determine the
+present taxonomic status of these animals and the distribution of each
+within the boundaries of Kansas. No pocket gopher of any kind has been
+reported from the southeastern part of the state; in all other parts
+_Geomys_ is locally common.
+
+
+
+
+HISTORY
+
+
+The first published reference that we have found to pocket gophers of
+Kansas is Prof. Spencer F. Baird's (1857:377, 380) mention of two
+specimens from Fort Riley. One he identified as _Geomys bursarius_ (p.
+377) and the other (p. 380) he doubtfully referred to _Geomys
+breviceps_. Both specimens were obtained by Dr. W. A. Hammond. J. A.
+Allen (1874:49) reported pocket gophers from Kansas under the generic
+name "Geomys?". Professor M. V. B. Knox (1875:21) published a list of
+Kansas mammals in which he used the names _Geomys bursarius_ Shaw and
+_Geomys breviceps_ Baird, the last one for the specimen taken by Dr.
+Hammond, at Fort Riley. Baker (1889:57) employed the name _Geomys
+bursarius_ Rich. for the gopher "found along the hundredth meridian,
+between N latitude 38° 30' and 39° 30'." He reported this animal as
+common in western Kansas. Merriam (1895:129) recorded _G. bursarius_ and
+_G. lutescens_ from Kansas. Allen (1895:265) recorded five specimens of
+_Geomys lutescens_ collected between September 16 and October 13 at Long
+Island, Phillips County, Kansas, by W. W. Granger. Since that time
+several papers, some of them dealing mostly with habits of pocket
+gophers, have been published in which reference is made to _Geomys_ in
+Kansas. Hibbard (1933:240) recognized three species: _G. bursarius_, _G.
+lutescens_, and _G. breviceps llanensis_. In 1944 (74-75) he recorded
+_Cratogeomys_ from Meade County, on the basis of two skulls dug out of
+the ground, and he recognized the same three full species of the genus
+_Geomys_ that he did in 1933, along with two additional subspecies.
+
+Specimens to the total number of 335 from Kansas have been available
+for the present study of the five subspecies recognized. The reason for
+arranging all of the named kinds as subspecies of a single species is
+that intergradation has been found to occur between every pair of kinds
+having contiguous geographic ranges. The characters previously thought
+by some writers constantly to differentiate, say, _Geomys lutescens_ of
+western Kansas from _Geomys bursarius_ of eastern Kansas, prove not to
+do so; instead, in areas geographically intermediate between the
+geographic ranges of the two kinds, the pocket gophers are intermediate
+in morphological characters and therefore are regarded as intergrades.
+Intergradation of this kind here is accepted as the criterion of
+subspecies, and lack of such intergradation as the criterion of species.
+Search for structural characters, distinctive of the different kinds,
+additional to those characters noted by other writers, has resulted in
+the finding of a few such characters but they too are subject to
+intergradation. Therefore the several kinds are arranged as subspecies
+of a single species which takes the name _Geomys bursarius_ because it
+is the oldest available name. Detailed comment on specimens showing
+intergradation are to be found in the accounts of _G. b. bursarius_ and
+_G. b. major_.
+
+
+
+
+METHODS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
+
+
+The series with the largest number of individuals from one restricted
+locality was selected for initial study. These individuals were
+segregated by sex, and specimens of each sex were arranged from oldest
+to youngest. Each series was divided into age-groups, and within a given
+age-group of one sex from one locality of what was considered as one
+species, estimation was made of the amount of individual variation.
+Thus, it was possible when comparing different kinds of pocket gophers
+to use only one age class of one season of one sex.
+
+Age was estimated to some extent by size of animal and nature of its
+pelage. The immature pelage is grayer and the hair is more crinkled than
+in adults. A more certain guide to age, however, is furnished by the
+skull. With increasing age some sutures disappear, the rostrum increases
+in length and the ridges marking the limits of the temporal muscles come
+to fuse and eventually, in males, form a high sagittal crest.
+
+ Cranial measurements were taken as follows:
+
+ Basilar length.--From the anteriormost inferior border of the
+ foramen magnum to a line connecting the posteriormost margins
+ of the alveoli of the first upper incisors.
+
+ Length of the nasals.--The greatest length of the nasals.
+
+ Zygomatic breadth.--The greatest distance across the zygomatic
+ arches.
+
+ Mastoid breadth.--The greatest distance across the mastoids.
+
+ Breadth of rostrum.--Width, perpendicular to long axis of the
+ skull.
+
+ Interorbital constriction.--The least distance between the
+ orbits.
+
+ Maxillary tooth row.--The greatest length of the upper
+ molariform tooth row at the alveolar border.
+
+ Extension of premaxillae posterior to nasals.--From the
+ posteriormost border of the nasals to the posterior end of the
+ extension of a premaxilla.
+
+ Depth of skull.--From the median suture of the frontals, on the
+ dorsal surface of the skull to the median suture of the
+ palatines at the level of the first molar (not premolar).
+
+ Length of rostrum.--From the anterior border of the nasal to
+ the maxilla at the lateral end of the hamulus of the lacrimal.
+
+ In the list of specimens examined, localities are arranged by
+ counties from west to east, beginning at the northwestern
+ corner of the state; specimens in each county are arranged from
+ north to south. If several localities are in the same latitude,
+ the westernmost is listed first. Capitalized color terms are
+ after Ridgway, Color Standards and Color Nomenclature,
+ Washington, D. C., 1912.
+
+ [Illustration: FIG. 1. Map showing the geographic distribution of the
+ five subspecies of the Mississippi Valley pocket gopher, _Geomys
+ bursarius_, in Kansas, with insert showing range of the species.]
+
+ In connection with this study each of the authors acknowledges
+ assistance from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
+ and one of us (Villa) is grateful for assistance also to Drs.
+ Isaac Ochoterena and Roberto Llamas of the Biological Institute
+ of Mexico. For the loan of specimens we are grateful to Dr.
+ William B. Davis, of the Agricultural and Mechanical College of
+ Texas; Dr. G. C. Rinker, of Hamilton, Kansas; and Mr. A. J.
+ Kirn, of Somerset, Texas. Unless otherwise indicated, specimens
+ are in the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History.
+
+
+
+
+ ACCOUNTS OF SUBSPECIES
+
+ =Geomys bursarius lutescens=, Merriam
+
+
+ _Geomys bursarius lutescens_ Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 4:51,
+ October 8, 1890; Scheffer, Technical Bull., U. S. Dept. Agric.,
+ 224:6, January, 1931.
+
+ _Geomys lutescens_ Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 8:127-29,
+ January 31, 1895; Lantz, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 19:175,
+ 1905; Lantz, Kansas State Agric. College Bull., 129:335, April,
+ 1905; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 36:240, 1933; Black,
+ 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board Agric., 35:182, 1937;
+ Swenk, Missouri Valley Fauna, 2:1, February 1, 1940; Allen,
+ Kansas State Teachers College, Emporia, Bull. Inf. in Educ., 20
+ (no. 5):15, May, 1940; Hooper, Occas. Papers Mus. Zoöl., Univ.
+ Michigan, 420:3, June 28, 1940.
+
+ _Geomys lutescens lutescens_, Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad.
+ Sci., 47:74, 1944.
+
+ _Type locality._--Sandhills on Birdwood Creek, Lincoln County,
+ western Nebraska.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Northwestern Kansas, eastward
+ certainly to Ellis County, southward certainly to Scott County.
+
+ _Description._--Animals with total length averaging no more
+ than 272 mm.; length of vertebrae of tail averaging no more
+ than 92; hind foot averaging no more than 35. Color: In autumn
+ pelage, upper parts Light Ochraceous-Buff becoming Buckthorn
+ Brown in middorsal region and there forming a faint
+ longitudinal band; sides Pale Yellow Orange. In summer,
+ Buckthorn Brown on upper parts with a dorsal band, especially
+ distinct on specimens from Ellis and Trego counties; specimens
+ from farther west lack the distinct dorsal band. Underparts
+ Gray Drab and sometimes whitish, usually whitish in young
+ specimens; basal color of pelage Deep Neutral Gray; fore and
+ hind feet whitish. Skull: Zygomatic arch broadly and squarely
+ spreading anteriorly; temporal impressions uniting to form a
+ low sagittal crest in adult males, but in adult females and in
+ young males the impressions usually remain apart; shape of
+ interparietal varying from subquadrate in young specimens to
+ subtriangular or triangular in adults; in some young specimens
+ the interparietal is reduced to a minute, ovoid bone.
+
+_Comparisons._--See comparisons in the accounts of other subspecies
+occurring in Kansas.
+
+_Remarks._--In his monographic revision of the pocket gophers, Merriam
+(1895:129) recorded 3 "typical or nearly typical" specimens from Trego
+County, and 18 "non typical" specimens as follows: Garden Plain,
+Sedgwick County, 4; Belle Plain, Sumner County, 5; Cairo, Pratt County,
+6; Kiowa, Barber County, 2; and Ellis, Ellis County, 1. A detailed
+discussion of Merriam's account of the distribution of _Geomys
+lutescens_ in Kansas is given by Swenk (1940:11-12).
+
+Judging by specimens in the University of Kansas Museum of Natural
+History, _G. bursarius lutescens_ in Kansas is restricted to the
+northwestern part of the state, reaching southward certainly to Scott
+County and eastward certainly to Ellis County; precise limits of
+distribution of this subspecies are unknown. Additional collecting is
+necessary to determine where the range of _lutescens_ meets the ranges
+of the other subspecies. The specimens studied are remarkably uniform.
+One specimen obtained in October, in Trego County, is slightly lighter
+colored than any other from Kansas. In other characteristics it agrees
+with specimens from northwestern Kansas and from the type locality.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number 32, as follows: _Cheyenne
+ County_: 23 mi. (by road) NW St. Francis, 3. _Rawlins County_:
+ 2 mi. NE Ludell, 10. _Logan County_: 5 mi. W Elkader, 3; no
+ locality more precise than county, 1. _Trego County_: Wakeeney,
+ 4; 12 mi. S Collyer, Perrington Ranch, 3; no locality more
+ precise than county, 5. _Scott County_: 4 mi. S Scott City, 2.
+ _Ellis County_: Hays State College Campus, Hays, 1.
+
+
+ =Geomys bursarius majusculus= Swenk
+
+ _Geomys bursarius majusculus_ Swenk, Missouri Valley Fauna,
+ 1:6, December 5, 1939; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+ 47:74, 1944.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius_, Baird, Expls. and surveys for a railroad
+ route from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, pt. 1,
+ Mammals, 377, 1857; Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 8:120, January,
+ 1895; Lantz, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 19:175, 1905; Lantz,
+ Kansas State Agric. College Bull., 129:335, April, 1905;
+ Scheffer, Kansas State Agric. College Ento. and Zoöl. Dept.
+ Bull., 172:199, September, 1910; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad.
+ Sci., 36:240, 1933; Allen, Kansas State Teachers College
+ Emporia Bull. Inf. Stud. in Educ., 20 (no. 5):15, May, 1940.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius bursarius_, Black, 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas
+ State Board Agric., 35:181, 1937.
+
+ _Geomys breviceps_, Baird, Expls. and surveys for a railroad
+ route from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, pt. 1,
+ Mammals, 380, 1857.
+
+ _Type locality._--Lincoln, Lancaster County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Northeastern Kansas, westward
+ certainly to Clay and Marion counties and southward certainly
+ to Greenwood County.
+
+ _Description._--Color: Upper parts Mummy Brown in fresh
+ appearing pelage of February but in more worn pelage of March
+ more reddish being near (16') Prout's Brown; top of head and
+ sometimes back darker than rest of upper parts; underparts
+ usually with some whitish anteriorly; fore and hind feet and
+ approximately distal half of tail white. Size: Large, total
+ length averaging more than 280 mm. in males and 257 in females;
+ hind foot averaging 35 mm. or more in males. Skull: Large;
+ rostrum averaging more than twice as long as wide; sagittal
+ crest high in males and barely present in females; occiput
+ vertical when skull is laid top down; least width of braincase
+ less than
+ distance from alveolus of upper incisor to middle of lateral
+ border of P^4 at alveolar border.
+
+_Comparisons._--From _Geomys bursarius lutescens_, _majusculus_ differs
+as follows: Color darker, Mummy Brown to Prout's Brown instead of
+Buckthorn Brown. In both sexes: head and body a fifth to a sixth longer;
+hind foot 5 to 6 per cent longer; skull averaging larger in all parts
+measured except that premaxillae (in each subspecies) extend equally far
+posteriorly to nasals; diastema longer in relation to basilar length;
+rostrum longer relative to its width; sagittal crest higher; rostrum
+often more depressed distally; angle of suture between maxilla and jugal
+more obtuse.
+
+From _G. b. bursarius_, according to Swenk (1939:6), _majusculus_
+differs in larger size.
+
+From _G. b. illinoensis_, _majusculus_, according to Komarek and Spencer
+(1931:405), differs in brownish instead of slate-gray coloration and in
+two cranial characters as follows: Nasals straight-sided instead of
+shaped like an hour-glass, and superficial canals on palatine extending
+anteriorly beyond first molar, and from there anteriorly more or less
+separated. The first of these characters does not always hold;
+occasional individuals of _majusculus_, for example some from Douglas
+County, have the nasals shaped like an hour-glass.
+
+From _G. breviceps dutcheri_, _majusculus_ differs in larger size (hind
+foot more than 33 mm. in males, and 29 in females; basilar length more
+than 42 mm. in males and 36 in females); dorsal exposure of jugal longer
+than width of rostrum measured between ventral margins of infraorbital
+foramina.
+
+From _G. bursarius major_ of southcentral Kansas (for example Harvey
+County), _majusculus_ differs in slightly darker color, being Mummy
+Brown instead of Prout's Brown; size larger (in males total length more
+than 284 mm., hind foot 35 or more, basilar length of skull more than
+42, and in females total length 265 or more, hind foot averaging 33 or
+more, and basilar length 40 or more).
+
+Skull: Averaging larger in all parts measured, except that premaxillae
+do not extend so far posteriorly to nasals in either males or females;
+interorbital constriction slightly narrower in adult females; temporal
+ridges forming a more prominent sagittal crest in adult males (sagittal
+crest barely present in some adult males of _major_ from Harper County).
+
+_Remarks._--In employing the subspecific name _majusculus_ we are
+following Swenk (1939:6) who on the basis of larger size differentiated
+the animals from southeastern South Dakota, the eastern parts of
+Nebraska and Kansas, and the western and southern parts of Iowa, from
+_G. bursarius bursarius_ to which he assigned a more northern geographic
+range. In the absence of comparative materials of the northern
+subspecies we cannot make an independent decision on the validity of
+_majusculus_ and recognize that if it is inseparable from _G. b.
+bursarius_ the latter name will apply to specimens from northeastern
+Kansas. We are the more uncertain about applying the name _majusculus_
+to specimens from eastern Kansas because they average smaller than
+topotypes. Only at the northeasternmost locality in Kansas (3 mi. N
+Cummings, Atchison County) do specimens average as large as topotypes of
+_majusculus_. Farther southward they become progressively smaller in
+eastern Kansas, and we interpret this as intergradation with the still
+smaller subspecies _major_, to the southwest. The average external
+measurements of two adult males from Atchison County are: 321-99-35.
+Thirty-six miles farther south, in Douglas County, 16 adult males
+average 289-80-36. From Hamilton, Greenwood County, 80 miles farther
+southwest, nine adult males average 284-83-35. The maximum total length
+recorded at these three localities is: Atchison County, 342 (1 of 2
+specimens), Douglas County, 308 (1 of 16 specimens), Greenwood County,
+357 (in coll. of Dr. Glenn C. Rinker and 1 of 15 males of all ages
+involved). It will be seen, therefore, that although there is a trend to
+smaller average size toward the southward, the maximum of 357
+millimeters total length at Hamilton exceeds the maximum of 352
+millimeters recorded by Swenk (1939:3) among 86 males at Lincoln where
+the recorded average is largest.
+
+Four specimens from Salina (Debold Farm) are intermediate structurally,
+as they are also geographically, between _G. b. majusculus_ on the one
+hand and _Geomys bursarius lutescens_ and _Geomys bursarius major_ on
+the other hand. In color they agree with _majusculus_, as they do also
+in width of nasals posteriorly, in more obtuse angle of the rostrum and
+maxillary arm of the zygomatic arch. They agree with _G. b. lutescens_
+in having the occiput inclined anterodorsally, and are intermediate
+between _majusculus_ and _lutescens_, but nearer the latter in size of
+skull and in length of the rostrum relative to its width.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number, 148, as follows: _Clay
+ County_: 6 mi. SW Clay Center, 3. _Jackson County_: 10-1/2 mi.
+ WSW Holton, 1; no locality more precise than county, 1.
+ _Atchison County_: 3 mi. N Cummings, 2. _Jefferson County_:
+ Oskaloosa, 1. _Leavenworth County_: Fort Leavenworth
+ (Government Hill, 2; Engineer Hill, 1), 6; no locality more
+ precise
+ than county, 19. _Saline County_: Salina, Debold Farm, 4 (coll.
+ of A. J. Kirn). _Morris County_: 1-1/2 mi. N Council Grove, 3.
+ _Douglas County_: 1 mi. NW Midland, 2; 1 mi. N Lawrence, 1;
+ 2-1/2 mi. W Lawrence, 2; 1 mi. W K. U. Campus, 2; 1 mi. W
+ Lawrence, 2; 1/2 mi. W Lawrence, 2; "W K. U. Campus," 2; K. U.
+ Campus, 4; Lawrence, 23; South Lawrence, 1; 1/2 mi. SW K. U.
+ Campus, 2; Southwest K. U. Campus, 1; Haskell Institute, 1;
+ 4-1/2 mi. S Lawrence, 1; 7 mi. SW Lawrence, 6; 7-1/2 mi. SW
+ Lawrence, 1; 8 mi. SW Lawrence, 1; 10 mi. S Lawrence, 1; 11 mi.
+ SW Lawrence, 3; no locality more precise than county, 15.
+ _Marion County_: 1-1/2 mi. NE Lincolnville, 6; 4 mi. SE
+ Lincolnville, 1; 6 mi. S Lincolnville, 1. _Greenwood County_:
+ Hamilton, 1; 1/2 mi. S Hamilton, 4; 1 mi. S Hamilton, 4; 4 mi.
+ S and 14 mi. W Hamilton, 6; 8 mi. SW Toronto, 1; 8-1/2 mi. SW
+ Toronto, 5; no locality more precise than county, 6.
+
+
+ =Geomys bursarius jugossicularis= Hooper
+
+ _Geomys lutescens jugossicularis_ Hooper, Occas. Papers Mus.
+ Zoöl., Univ. Michigan, no. 420: 1, June 28, 1940; Hibbard,
+ Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., vol. 47, p. 75, 1944.
+
+ _Type locality._--Lamar, Prowers County, Colorado.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Extreme southwestern part of state,
+ northward certainly to Hamilton County and south certainly to
+ Morton and Seward counties.
+
+ _Description._--A yellowish-cinnamon colored animal, with body
+ of medium size, zygomatic plate of maxilla deep and mastoid
+ process small.
+
+_Comparisons._--Differs from _Geomys bursarius industrius_ in slightly
+lighter color; occiput not strongly inclined anterodorsally.
+
+From _G. b. lutescens_, _jugossicularis_ differs in less buffy
+coloration and deeper zygomatic plate of maxilla.
+
+_Remarks._--_G. bursarius jugossicularis_ and _G. bursarius industrius_
+intergrade in the southern part of Meade County. Some specimens from
+this area show a coloration resembling that of _G. b. jugossicularis_;
+nevertheless, one specimen from Morton County has the occiput
+anterodorsally inclined as in _G. b. industrius_.
+
+ Specimens examined from Hamilton County correspond closely to _G. b.
+ jugossicularis_; they agree with it both in color and in cranial
+ characters.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number, 20, distributed as
+ follows: _Hamilton County_: 1 mi. E Coolidge, Conard Farm, 4.
+ _Morton County_: 12 mi. NE Elkhart, 2; Cimarron River, 12 mi. N
+ Elkhart, 4; no locality more precise than county, 6. _Seward
+ County_: 1 mi. E Arkalon, 4.
+
+
+ =Geomys bursarius industrius=, new subspecies
+
+ _Geomys lutescens_ Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 8:127, January
+ 31, 1895.
+
+ _Geomys breviceps llanensis_, Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad.
+ Sci., 36:240, 1933; Black, 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board
+ Agric., 35:181. 1937.
+
+ _Geomys lutescens jugossicularis_ Hooper, Occas. Papers Mus.
+ Zoöl., Univ. Michigan, 420:1, June 28, 1940.
+
+ _Type._--Male, adult, skin and skull, no. 14083 Museum of
+ Natural History, University of Kansas; from 1-1/2 miles north
+ of Fowler, Meade County, Kansas; obtained December 30, 1941, by
+ H. H. Hildebrand, original number 16.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Southwestern Kansas from Meade
+ County eastward certainly to Pratt and Clark counties; from
+ Pawnee County southward probably to the Oklahoma boundary.
+
+ _Diagnosis._--Size of body medium; color of upper parts Cinnamon
+ Brown; skull with occiput strongly inclined anterodorsally in
+ males.
+
+ [Illustration: FIG. 2. Three views of the skull of the type
+ specimen of _Geomys bursarius industrius_. A. Lateral view; B.
+ Dorsal view; C. Ventral view. All natural size.]
+
+ _Description._--Color: Upper parts Cinnamon Brown, slightly
+ reddish, but in some specimens collected in September, in
+ Pawnee County, near (15´ _i_) Ochraceous-Tawny; underparts
+ usually Wood Brown, somewhat whitish anteriorly; forefeet
+ white; hind feet and approximately distal half of tail whitish.
+ Size: Medium (see measurements), total length averaging not
+ more than 271 mm. in males and 254 in females; hind foot
+ averaging not more than 35 mm. in males and less than 32 in
+ females. Skull: In males, least width of braincase equal to
+ distance from alveolus of incisor to anterior border of
+ alveolus of first upper molar, occiput strongly inclined
+ anterodorsally, temporal impressions usually united in a low
+ sagittal crest, zygomatic arch heavy and curved at level of
+ jugal bone. In adult females least width of braincase
+ approximately equal to distance from alveolus of incisor to
+ anterior border of alveolus of first upper molar (not
+ premolar); occiput less inclined anterodorsally
+ than in males; temporal ridges not forming a sagittal crest. In
+ young females the width of the braincase is more than the
+ distance between the alveoli of the incisor and first molar.
+
+_Comparisons._--_G. lutescens industrius_ differs from _G. lutescens
+lutescens_ in: Color darker; least width of braincase not equal to
+(usually more than) the distance from the alveolus of incisor to the
+anterior border of the alveolus of the first upper molar.
+
+_G. lutescens industrius_ differs from _G. lutescens jugossicularis_ in:
+Color slightly darker, the former being Cinnamon Brown instead of
+Vinaceous Cinnamon, with hairs basally Deep Neutral Gray in upper parts
+and underparts. Skull: Jugular part of zygomatic arch more curved
+(convex dorsally) and occiput far more inclined anterodorsally; lower
+part of mastoidal ridge more prominent.
+
+For comparison with _G. l. major_, see account of that subspecies.
+
+_Remarks._--Judging from the known specimens of this subspecies, it has
+the smallest geographic range of any of the subspecies in Kansas, but
+additional collecting in Hodgeman County and counties to the north and
+west of it may extend the known range in those directions; collecting in
+Comanche County and in adjoining parts of Oklahoma may extend the known
+range to the southward.
+
+The anterodorsal inclination of the occiput in males is the one cranial
+character in which _industrius_ differs from all of the subspecies with
+adjoining geographic ranges. The existence of this unique (among
+adjoining subspecies) cranial character is the principal reason for
+according subspecific status to this animal. Although it has other
+characters which are fairly uniform over a considerable geographic area,
+these other characters, namely, Cinnamon Brown color of the upper parts
+and medium size of the body, after all, are conditions intermediate
+between those in _jugossicularis_ to the west and those in the darker
+and larger animals assigned to _major_ to the eastward. Considering the
+intermediate geographic position of _industrius_, the color and size are
+approximately what a person would predict by study of only the animals
+to the west and those to the east. Therefore, the color and size
+probably are indicative of intergradation between _jugossicularis_ and
+_major_. Still, there is the anterodorsally inclined occiput in
+males--a character of a unique sort--and this influences us to give
+subspecific status to this animal with full recognition of the fact that
+it is a "weak" subspecies as compared with any one of the adjoining
+subspecies.
+
+Hooper (1940:2) in naming as new _Geomys lutescens jugossicularis_
+referred to his new subspecies a skin-only from Meade County State Park.
+Our more abundant material from there shows the cranial conformation to
+be that of _industrius_ to which we accordingly assign the specimens.
+However, with only a skin available, we, too, would have used the name
+_jugossicularis_ because the color is paler than in other specimens of
+_industrius_ and this paleness indicates intergradation between the two
+named subspecies. Specimens from Pratt County are slightly darker than
+_industrius_ thereby indicating intergradation between _industrius_ and
+_major_.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number, 58, distributed as
+ follows: _Pawnee County_: Jct. Pawnee and Arkansas rivers,
+ Larned, 6; 1 mi. S and 1 mi. E Larned, 7. _Edwards County_: 1
+ mi. W and 3-1/2 mi. S Kinsley, 1. _Kiowa County_: Rezeau Ranch,
+ 5 mi. N Belvidere, 2. _Pratt County_: Pratt, 14; no locality
+ more precise than county, 1. _Meade County_: 3-1/2 mi. NE
+ Fowler, 2; 2 mi. N Fowler, 2; 1-1/2 mi. N Fowler, 2; 1-1/4 mi.
+ N and 3/4 mi. E Fowler, 2; 7 mi. N Meade, Cudahy Ash Pit, 2; 13
+ mi. SW Meade, 9; State Lake, 2; State Park, 4. _Clark County_:
+ 7 mi. SW Kingsdown, E. A. Stephenson Ranch, 1; 6 mi. S
+ Kingsdown, 1.
+
+
+ =Geomys bursarius major= Davis
+
+ _Geomys lutescens major_ Davis, Texas Agric. Exp. St., Bull.
+ no. 590:32, August, 1940; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+ 47:75, 1944.
+
+ _Geomys lutescens_ Merriam, N. Amer. Fauna, 8:129, January 31,
+ 1895.
+
+ _Geomys breviceps llanensis_, Lantz, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 20
+ (pt. 2): 215, 1907; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 36:240,
+ 1933; Black, 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board Agric.,
+ 35:182, 1937; Swenk, Missouri Valley Fauna, 2:12, February 1,
+ 1940.
+
+ _Type locality._--Eight miles west of Clarendon, Donley County,
+ Texas.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Southcentral Kansas, northward
+ certainly to Ellsworth County, westward certainly to Stafford
+ and Barber counties and eastward to Cowley County.
+
+ _Description._--Color: Upper parts varying from Brussels Brown
+ in some specimens to nearly Prout's Brown, especially in
+ specimens from central part of state. Top of head, and
+ sometimes back, darker than rest of upper parts, but no well
+ defined black stripe; underparts varying from whitish to nearly
+ Buffy Brown; fore and hind feet and approximately distal half
+ of tail white. Size: Large (see measurements). Skull: Sagittal
+ crest absent in females and barely present in males; least
+ width of braincase more than distance from alveolus of incisor
+ to middle of lateral border of P^4 at alveolar border. Length
+ of auditory bulla (from anteroventral edge of paroccipital
+ process of exoccipital to hamulus of peterygoid), in each sex,
+ more than 8 mm.; occiput usually vertical when skull is laid
+ top down; zygomatic arch broadly and squarely spreading,
+ divergent anteriorly; rostrum averaging less than twice as long
+ as wide.
+
+_Comparisons._--From _G. bursarius lutescens_, _major_ differs in color
+darker, premaxillae extending slightly farther posteriorly; temporal
+impressions usually forming a more well-marked sagittal crest in males;
+ventral side of zygomatic arch, at level of jugal bone, more curved.
+
+From _G. bursarius majusculus_, _major_ differs in slightly lighter
+color, smaller size of body; in males, total length less than 284 mm.;
+hind foot 34 or less; basilar length of skull less than 42; in females
+total length less than 264, hind foot no more than 33, and basilar
+length less than 39.
+
+From _G. bursarius industrius_, _major_ differs in color, being Prout's
+Brown, instead of Cinnamon Brown (less Fuscous); body averaging 10 per
+cent longer; total length in males from 9 to 9.7 per cent longer, hind
+foot 9.7 per cent longer on the average; skull averaging larger in all
+parts measured. Occiput less inclined anterodorsally; top nearly flat,
+less arched than that of _G. b. industrius_; auditory bulla averaging
+slightly larger and less inflated.
+
+_Remarks._--Specimens of this subspecies from Norman, Cleveland County,
+Oklahoma, and Canton, Dewey County, Oklahoma, and most of those from
+Kansas, are more Fuscous than topotypes and tend toward _G. bursarius
+majusculus_. Specimens from McPherson County have a darker dorsal stripe
+resembling that of _G. bursarius majusculus_. One adult from Little Salt
+Marsh, Stafford County, is pale, closely resembling topotypes.
+
+Most of the cranial characters, nevertheless, are constant in all
+available specimens, except that in specimens of each sex from the type
+locality the basilar length averages 4 to 5 per cent shorter. In the
+constancy of size of the relatively large auditory bullae and in the
+nearly flat dorsal profile of the cranial part of the skull, the
+specimens from Kansas agree with the specimens from the type locality.
+
+Specimens from Harper County have the occiput slightly inclined
+anterodorsally and thus are reminiscent of _industrius_ which has an
+even greater inclination of the occiput. Probably the appearance in
+dilute fashion of this character in Harper County is properly to be
+interpreted as intergradation with _industrius_. If so, the actual
+intergradation may be to the northwest _via_ Pratt County since
+specimens from Barber County, immediately west of Harper and lying
+between Harper County and the range of _industrius_, do not have the
+occiput so inclined.
+
+Of a pair of adults from eight miles west of Rosalia, Butler County,
+the female is indistinguishable in color from adults of _G. b.
+industrius_ from northern Meade County and from two specimens from
+eleven miles west of Clarendon, Donley County, Texas, near the type
+locality of _G. b. major_. The male from eight miles west of Rosalia is
+darker as compared either with _G. b. industrius_ or _G. b. major_ and
+the coloration of the upper parts resembles those in _G. b._
+_majusculus_; the underparts are only slightly paler than the upper
+parts as in _majusculus_. Measurements of the skulls are intermediate
+between the averages for _G. b. majusculus_ and those for _G. b. major_.
+These specimens from eight miles west of Rosalia are intermediate
+structurally, and since they are intermediate geographically between _G.
+b. majusculus_ and _G. b. major_, they suggest intergradation of the two
+subspecies. The specimens in question are referred to _major_ because
+the size is nearer that of _major_. It is mainly the intermediate nature
+of these two specimens from Butler County, and the intermediate nature
+of the specimens from McPherson County, Kansas, that have caused us to
+treat _G. b. majusculus_ as only subspecifically distinct from the more
+western subspecies, _major_.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number, 77, as follows: _Ellsworth
+ County_: 2 mi. S Ellsworth, 1. _McPherson County_: Smoky Hill
+ River, 1 mi. S and 1/2 mi. W Lindsborg, 5; 1/2 mi. E McPherson,
+ 1. _Stafford County_: Little Salt Marsh, 12; no locality more
+ precise than county, 3. _Reno County_: 8 mi. N and 1 mi. E
+ Haven, 2. _Harvey County_: 1 mi. E and 1/2 mi. N Halstead, 1;
+ Halstead, 3. _Butler County_: 8 mi. W Rosalia, 2. _Barber
+ County_: near South Bridge, Sun City, 1; 2 mi. S Sun City, 1;
+ Wells Ranch, Aetna, 5; "1 mi. W Aetna," 3; near South Bridge,
+ Aetna, 1; near Bridge, 1 mi. S Aetna, 2. _Harper County_: 4-1/2
+ mi. NE Danville, 8; 1 mi. N Harper, 11; 3 mi. S Harper, 1.
+ _Cowley County_: 3 mi. SW Arkansas City, 4; 3 mi. SE Arkansas
+ City, 9; 3 mi. S Arkansas City, 1.
+
+
+
+
+ MEASUREMENTS OF ADULT MALES OF GEOMYS
+
+
+ (In millimeters)
+
+ Key for table headings in table on this page.
+
+ N: Number of individuals averaged or catalogue number
+ L: Total length
+ T: Length of tail
+ H: Length of hind foot
+ B: Basilar length
+ Na: Length of nasals
+ Z: Zygomatic breadth
+ M: Mastoid breadth
+ Rb: Breadth of rostrum
+ I: Interorbital constriction
+ A: Alveolar length of maxillary tooth row
+ E: Extension of premaxilla posterior to nasals
+ S: Depth of skull
+ Rl: Length of rostrum
+
+ ======+===+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+===+===+===+====+=====
+ N |L | T | H | B | Na | Z | M | Rb | I | A | E | S | Rl
+ ------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---+---+---+----+-----
+ _G. b. lutescens_; topotypes
+ 5 ave.|266|82.0|34.2|40.0|17.7|30.5|26.8|11.5|6.7|8.6|3.9|17.1|20.8
+ min.|257|76.0|33.0|38.3|16.0|29.1|26.1|11.2|6.3|8.1|3.5|16.2|19.1
+ max.|276|91.0|36.0|42.4|20.3|31.7|27.5|11.9|6.9|9.2|4.2|17.7|23.6
+
+ 2 mi. NE Ludell, Rawlins Co., Kansas
+ 12088|272|92.0|35.0|43.2|19.1|32.3|27.7|11.3|6.6|8.4|2.8|18.0|22.1
+
+ _G. b. majusculus_; Douglas Co., Kansas
+ | | | | | |[A] | | | | | | |
+ 16 ave. |289|79.8|36.3|47.1|21.0|34.1|30.4|12.1|6.8|9.3|3.7|18.5|24.9
+ min. |273|70.0|32.0|44.7|18.9|30.5|27.5|11.1|6.5|8.2|2.9|17.3|22.9
+ max. |308|95.0|55.0|49.9|23.2|38.0|34.5|13.5|7.6|10.3|5.7|20.0|28.1
+
+ _G. b. jugossicularis_; Morton Co., Kansas
+ 4 ave.|265|82.0|34.2|40.7|16.9|30.0|27.9|10.7|6.0|8.6|5.2|17.3|21.2
+ min.|250|68.0|30.0|38.5|16.1|29.0|27.5|10.5|5.5|8.2|4.7|16.4|20.2
+ max.|285|92.0|37.0|42.4|17.4|31.1|28.4|11.0|6.2|9.2|5.5|17.9|22.0
+
+ _G. b. industrius_; Meade Co., Kansas
+ 8 ave.|265|82.0|35.0|40.9|18.1|30.0|28.0|11.0|6.2|8.8|4.3|17.7|21.8
+ min.|247|70.0|33.0|37.9|15.5|28.2|26.5| 9.9|5.7|8.0|2.9|16.8|19.5
+ max.|280|90.0|36.0|43.4|21.0|32.4|29.5|11.6|7.0|9.1|5.2|19.1|24.2
+
+ _G. b. major_; Wells Ranch, Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 11724|256|66.0|34.0|41.0|18.3|31.6|28.2|10.6|6.1|9.0|4.0|17.0|21.3
+
+ 1 mi. W Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 11153|240|75.0|32.0|36.7|15.7|26.9|24.6| 9.9|5.9|8.8|4.0|15.0|19.5
+ 11152|240|65.0|32.0|36.0|14.2|26.1|25.4|10.9|5.6|8.5|5.0|15.5|18.5
+
+ 3 mi. SE Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas
+ | | | | |[E] | | | | | | | |
+ 12870|246|76.0|32.0|42.1|16.0|33.7|29.7|11.5|6.3|9.4|4.5|17.6|21.3
+
+ 3 mi. SW Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas
+ 12892|282|84.0|33.0|41.7|17.3|....|27.7|10.8|6.4|8.9|4.2|17.2|21.5
+ ------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---+---+---+----+-----
+
+
+
+
+ MEASUREMENTS OF ADULT FEMALES OF GEOMYS
+
+
+ (In millimeters)
+
+ Key for table headings in table on this page.
+
+ N: Number of individuals averaged or catalogue number
+ L: Total length
+ T: Length of tail
+ H: Length of hind foot
+ B: Basilar length
+ Na: Length of nasals
+ Z: Zygomatic breadth
+ M: Mastoid breadth
+ Rb: Breadth of rostrum
+ I: Interorbital constriction
+ A: Alveolar length of maxillary tooth row
+ E: Extension of premaxilla posterior to nasals
+ S: Depth of skull
+ Rl: Length of rostrum
+
+ ======+===+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+===+===+===+====+=====
+ N | L | T | H | B | Na | Z | M | Rb | I | A | E | S | Rl
+ ------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---+---+---+----+-----
+ _G. b. lutescens_; topotypes
+ 6 ave.|233|72.3|31.1|35.3|15.0|25.9|23.7|10.4|6.1|8.3|3.7|15.4|18.4
+ min.|215|63.0|30.0|33.5|13.9|24.6|21.8|10.1|5.6|8.1|2.9|14.8|17.3
+ max.|254|76.0|32.0|37.0|16.8|26.7|24.8|10.7|6.6|8.5|4.5|16.2|19.8
+
+ 2 mi. NE Ludell, Rawlins Co., Kansas
+ 11733|230|63.0|31.0|35.3|15.1|26.5|24.1| 9.3|6.1|7.5|2.4|15.0|18.2
+ 12155|245|70.0|30.0|35.6|14.6|25.2|24.1|10.6|6.4|7.5|3.1|14.9|18.2
+
+ _G. b. majusculus_; Douglas Co., Kansas
+ | | | |[B] |[B] |[A] | | | | | | |
+ 17 ave. |265|78.6|32.8|40.6|17.2|28.6|26.4|10.9|6.5|9.1|3.6|16.6|21.0
+ min. |222|59.0|30.0|37.1|15.9|26.7|24.9|10.0|5.9|8.5|2.0|15.2|18.8
+ max. |304|92.0|35.0|47.0|20.1|33.4|29.1|12.3|7.3|10.0|5.9|19.1|24.1
+
+ _G. b. jugossicularis_; Morton Co., Kansas
+ 5012|244|72.0|30.0|36.2|16.4|25.4|25.0|10.0|5.9|8.0|4.2|16.0|19.3
+ 5395|230|72.0|30.0|34.6|13.9|24.7|24.8| 9.8|5.8|8.0|4.5|15.2|17.5
+
+ _G. b. industrius_; Meade Co., Kansas
+ | |[C] | |[D] | | |[D] |
+ 7 ave. |238|73.0|31.3|36.4|14.9|26.3|24.8|10.0|6.0|8.4|4.1|16.2|18.6
+ min. |231|65.0|30.0|35.4|14.0|25.8|24.5| 9.5|5.6|8.1|3.6|15.5|17.5
+ max. |256|75.0|32.0|37.8|16.1|27.8|25.9|10.3|6.5|8.7|4.7|17.6|19.9
+
+ _G. b. major_; 1 mi. S Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 10069|257|95.0|32.0|37.0|16.4|26.4|25.5|10.8|6.2|9.0|3.4|16.4|19.4
+
+ Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 10070|242|83.0|30.0|36.8|15.7|26.2|25.0|10.1|6.5|9.1|3.3|15.8|19.1
+
+ Wells Ranch, Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 12238|239|65.0|31.0|34.2|14.5|24.6|23.7| 9.6|6.0|8.0|3.6|15.2|17.7
+
+ 1 mi. S.Sun City, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 11075|232|66.0|28.0|34.2|14.4|25.0|23.6| 9.9|5.9|8.0|3.4|15.0|17.0
+
+ 3 mi. SW Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas
+ 12872|242|66.0|30.0|38.1|15.0|28.0|26.2|10.3|6.3|7.8|4.5|16.1|19.1
+
+ 3 mi. SE Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas
+ 12894|230|82.0|30.0|38.5|15.5|28.0|25.6|10.0|6.7|8.7|4.0|16.6|19.5
+ 12893|246|83.0|32.0|36.5|14.2|25.6|24.8| 9.6|6.6|8.7|4.6|15.4|18.1
+ ------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---+---+---+----+-----
+
+[A] 15 averaged.
+
+[B] 16 averaged.
+
+[C] 6 averaged.
+
+[D] 5 averaged.
+
+[E] approximate.
+
+
+
+
+SUBSPECIES OF THE SPECIES GEOMYS BURSARIUS
+
+
+If _Geomys lutescens major_ Davis is correctly judged to intergrade with
+_Geomys bursarius majusculus_ Swenk, the name for the full species will
+be _Geomys bursarius_ because _bursarius_ is the oldest name among those
+available. Some new combinations of names are required. According to our
+present understanding, the eleven kinds of pocket gophers named below
+are properly to be arranged as subspecies of the species _Geomys
+bursarius_:
+
+ _Geomys bursarius bursarius_ (Shaw). Type from unknown locality
+ in Upper Mississippi Valley.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius majusculus_ Swenk. Type from Lincoln,
+ Lancaster County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius hylaeus_ Blossom. Type from 10 mi. S Chadron,
+ Dawes County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius levisagittalis_ Swenk. Type from Spencer,
+ Boyd County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius vinaceus_ Swenk. Type from Scottsbluff,
+ Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius lutescens_ Merriam. Type from Sandhills on
+ Birdwood Creek, Lincoln County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius illinoensis_ Komarek and Spencer. Type from 1
+ mi. S Momence, Kankakee County, Illinois.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius jugossicularis_ Hooper. Type from Lamar,
+ Prowers County, Colorado.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius industrius_ new subspecies. Type from 1-1/2
+ mi. N Fowler, Meade County, Kansas.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius major_ Davis. Type from 8 mi. W Clarendon,
+ Donley County, Texas.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius llanensis_ Bailey. Type from Llano, Llano
+ County, Texas.
+
+
+
+
+LITERATURE CITED
+
+
+ALLEN, J. A.
+ 1874. Notes on the mammals of portions of Kansas, Colorado,
+ Wyoming and Utah. Part I. On the mammals of middle and western
+ Kansas. Bull. Essex Inst., 6 (no. 2):43-52. February, 1874.
+
+ 1895. List of mammals collected in the Black Hills region of
+ South Dakota and in western Kansas by Mr. Walter W. Granger
+ with field notes by the collector. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,
+ 7:259-274. August 21, 1895.
+
+ALLEN, P.
+ 1940. Kansas mammals. Kansas State Teachers College, Emporia,
+ Bull. Inf. Stud. in Educ., Number 20 (no. 5):l-62. May, 1940.
+
+BAKER, A. B.
+ 1889. Mammals of western Kansas. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+ 11:56-58 (for 1887-88).
+
+BAIRD, S. F.
+ 1857. Explorations and surveys for a railroad route from the
+ Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean. War Department.
+ Mammals, Part I, xxxii + 757, pls. 17-60, 35 figs. in text,
+ 1857.
+
+BLACK, J. D.
+ 1937. Mammals of Kansas. Thirtieth Bienn. Rept. Kansas State
+ Board of Agric., 35:116-217.
+
+DAVIS, W. B.
+ 1940. Distribution and variation of pocket gophers (Genus
+ Geomys) in the southwestern United States. Texas Agric. Exp.
+ Station, Bull., 590:1-38, 6 figs. in text. October 23, 1940.
+
+HIBBARD, C. W.
+ 1933. A revised check list of Kansas mammals. Trans. Kansas
+ Acad. Sci., 36:230-249.
+
+ 1944. A checklist of Kansas mammals, 1943. Trans. Kansas Acad.
+ Sci., 47:61-88.
+
+HOOPER, E. T.
+ 1940. A new race of pocket gopher of the species Geomys
+ lutescens from Colorado. Occas. Papers, Mus. Zoöl., Univ.
+ Michigan, 420:1-3. June 28, 1940.
+
+KNOX, M. V. B.
+ 1875. Kansas Mammalia. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 4:18-22.
+
+KOMAREK, E. V. , and SPENCER, D. A.
+ 1931. A new pocket gopher from Illinois and Indiana. Journ.
+ Mamm., 12:404-408, 1 pl., 1 fig. in text. November 11, 1931.
+
+LANTZ, D. E.
+ 1905. Kansas mammals in their relations to agriculture. Kansas
+ State Agric. College Bull., 129:331-404. April, 1905.
+
+ 1905. A list of Kansas mammals. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+ 19:171-178.
+
+ 1907. Additions and corrections to the list of Kansas mammals.
+ Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 20 (pt. 2):214-217.
+
+MERRIAM, C. H.
+ 1890. Descriptions of twenty-six new species of North American
+ mammals. N. Amer. Fauna, 4: v + 60, 3 pls., 3 figs. in text.
+ October 8, 1890.
+
+ 1895. Monographic revision of the pocket gopher Family
+ Geomyidae.... N. Amer. Fauna, 8:1-258, 19 pls. and
+ frontispiece, 71 figs. in text, 4 maps. January 31, 1895.
+
+SCHEFFER, T. H.
+ 1910. The pocket gopher. Kansas State Agric. Coll. Ent. and
+ Zoöl. Dept., Bull., 172:197-233, illustrated. September, 1910.
+
+ 1931. Habits and economic status of the pocket gophers. U. S.
+ Dept. Agric., Tech. Bull., 224:1-27, 8 pls., 2 figs. in text.
+ January, 1931.
+
+SWENK, M. H.
+ 1939. A study of local size variations in the prairie pocket
+ gopher (Geomys bursarius), with description of a new subspecies
+ from Nebraska. Missouri Valley Fauna, 1:1-8. December 5, 1939.
+
+ 1940. A study of subspecific variation in the yellow pocket
+ gopher (Geomys lutescens) in Nebraska, and the geographical and
+ ecological distribution of the variants. Missouri Valley Fauna,
+ 2:1-12. February 1, 1940.
+
+_Transmitted May 30, 1947._
+
+
+ PRINTED BY
+ FRED VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER
+ TOPEKA, KANSAS
+ 1947
+ 21-8188
+
+
+
+
+Transcriber Notes:
+
+
+Minor typographical errors were corrected without notice.
+
+Italic words and phrases are marked _like this_.
+
+Bold words and phrases are marked =like this=.
+
+Small caps are converted to all upper case, LIKE THIS.
+
+Superscripts in text are indicated by use of the caret, like this ^4.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of
+Kansas, [KU. Vol. 1 No. 11], by Bernardo Villa-R and E. Raymond Hall
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK POCKET GOPHERS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 36653-8.txt or 36653-8.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/6/6/5/36653/
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Matthew Wheaton
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/36653-8.zip b/36653-8.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5d2d2a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36653-8.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36653-h.zip b/36653-h.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9dc810b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36653-h.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36653-h/36653-h.htm b/36653-h/36653-h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5830ad1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36653-h/36653-h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,2417 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
+ <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+
+<head>
+
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" />
+
+ <title>
+ The Project Gutenberg eBook of Subspeciation In Pocket Gophers Of Kansas [KU. Vol 1 No 11], by Bernardo Villa-R. and E. Raymond Hall.
+ </title>
+
+ <style type="text/css">
+
+ #booktitle {
+ letter-spacing : 3px;
+ }
+
+ .cen {
+ text-align : center;
+ font-weight : bold;
+ }
+
+ .figcenter {
+ padding : 1em;
+ text-align : center;
+ font-size : 0.8em;
+ border : none;
+ margin : 0;
+ text-indent : 1em;
+ }
+
+ .figcenter img {
+ border: none;
+ }
+
+ .figcenter p {
+ margin: 0;
+ text-indent: 1em;
+ }
+
+ .figcenter {
+ margin: auto;
+ }
+
+ .footnote {
+ font-size: 0.9em;
+ margin-right: 10%;
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ }
+
+ .footnote .label {
+ position: absolute; right: 84%;
+ text-align: right;
+ }
+
+ .fnanchor {
+ vertical-align: super;
+ font-size: .6em;
+ text-decoration: none;
+ }
+
+ .h1 {
+ font-size: 2em;
+ margin: .67em 0;
+ }
+
+ .h2 {
+ font-size: 1.5em;
+ margin: .75em 0;
+ }
+
+ .h3 {
+ font-size: 1.17em;
+ margin: 1.83em 0 0 0;
+/* margin: 1.83em; */
+ }
+
+ .h4 {
+ margin: 1.12em;
+ }
+
+ .h5 {
+ font-size: .83em;
+/* margin: 1.5em; */
+ }
+
+ .h6 {
+ font-size: .75em;
+ margin: 1.67em 0;
+ }
+
+ .h1, .h2, .h3, .h4, .h5, .h6 {
+ font-weight: bolder;
+ text-align : center;
+ }
+
+ .noin {
+ text-indent : 0;
+ }
+
+ .outdent {
+ text-indent : -2em;
+ margin-left: 10%;
+ }
+
+ p.caption {
+ text-indent:0;
+ text-align:center;
+ font-weight:bold;
+ margin-bottom:2em;
+ }
+
+ .pagenum {
+ visibility : hidden; /* comment out to display page numbers */
+ position : absolute;
+ right : 2%;
+ font-size : 75%;
+ color : gray;
+ background-color : inherit;
+ text-align : right;
+ text-indent : 0;
+ font-style : normal;
+ font-weight : normal;
+ font-variant : normal;
+ }
+
+ .smcap {
+ font-variant : small-caps;
+ }
+
+ .tdc {
+ text-align: center;
+ }
+
+ .tdr {
+ text-align : right;
+ padding-right : 1em;
+ }
+
+ .trnote {
+ margin-left : 15%;
+ margin-right : 15%;
+ margin-top : 5%;
+ margin-bottom : 5%;
+ padding : 1em;
+ background-color : #f6f2f2;
+ color : black;
+ border : 1px dotted black;
+ }
+
+ body {
+ margin-left : 10%;
+ margin-right : 10%;
+ }
+
+ h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr {
+ text-align : center;
+ }
+
+ h2 + h3 {
+ margin-bottom : 2em;
+ }
+
+ h5 {
+ margin-bottom : 1%;
+ margin-top : 1%;
+ }
+
+ hr {
+ width : 50%;
+ }
+
+ hr.full {
+ width: 100%;
+ }
+
+ html > body hr {
+ margin-right : 25%;
+ margin-left : 25%;
+ width : 50%;
+ }
+
+ html > body hr.full {
+ margin-right : 0%;
+ margin-left : 0%;
+ width : 100%;
+ }
+
+ html > body hr.short {
+ margin-right : 45%;
+ margin-left : 45%;
+ width : 10%;
+ }
+
+ hr.chapter {
+ margin-top : 6em;
+ margin-bottom : 4em;
+ }
+
+ hr.full {
+ width : 100%;
+ }
+
+ p {
+ text-align : justify;
+ margin-top : .1em;
+ margin-bottom : .1em;
+ text-indent : 1em;
+ }
+
+ p.spacer {
+ margin-top : 3em;
+ margin-bottom : 3em;
+ }
+
+ </style>
+
+</head>
+
+<body>
+
+
+<pre>
+
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas,
+[KU. Vol. 1 No. 11], by Bernardo Villa-R and E. Raymond Hall
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas, [KU. Vol. 1 No. 11]
+
+Author: Bernardo Villa-R
+ E. Raymond Hall
+
+Release Date: July 7, 2011 [EBook #36653]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK POCKET GOPHERS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Matthew Wheaton
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+<div>
+
+<p class="h3">Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas</p>
+
+<p class="h5">By<br />BERNARDO VILLA-R. and E. RAYMOND HALL</p>
+
+<p class="spacer">&nbsp;</p>
+
+<p class="h4">University of Kansas Publications<br />Museum of Natural History</p>
+
+<p class="h5">Volume 1, No. 11. pp. 217-236<br />November 29, 1947</p>
+
+<p class="spacer">&nbsp;</p>
+
+<p class="h5">UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS<br />LAWRENCE<br />1947</p>
+
+<p class="spacer">&nbsp;</p>
+
+<p class="h6"><span class="smcap">University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History</span>
+<br />Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, H. H. Lane, and Edward H. Taylor
+<br />Volume 1, No 11. pp. 217-236
+<br />Published November 29, 1947</p>
+
+<p class="spacer">&nbsp;</p>
+
+<p class="h6"><span class="smcap">University of Kansas</span><br />Lawrence, Kansas</p>
+
+<p class="spacer">&nbsp;</p>
+
+<p class="h6" style="margin : 0">PRINTED BY<br />FRED VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER<br />TOPEKA, KANSAS<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;1947</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter" style="margin : 0">
+ <img border="0" src="images/decoration.png" width="87" height="29" alt="decoration" />
+</div>
+
+<p class="h6" style="margin : 0">21-8188</p>
+
+<p class="spacer">&nbsp;</p>
+
+<h1 id="booktitle">Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas</h1>
+
+<p class="h5">By</p>
+
+<p class="h5">BERNARDO VILLA-R. AND E. RAYMOND HALL</p>
+
+<p> <span class="pagenum">[219]</span>
+Several full species of the genus <i>Geomys</i> have been recorded from
+Kansas. The purpose of the study now reported upon was to determine
+the present taxonomic status of these animals and the distribution
+of each within the boundaries of Kansas. No pocket
+gopher of any kind has been reported from the southeastern part of
+the state; in all other parts <i>Geomys</i> is locally common.</p>
+
+<h2>HISTORY</h2>
+
+<p>The first published reference that we have found to pocket gophers
+of Kansas is Prof. Spencer F. Baird's (1857:377, 380) mention
+of two specimens from Fort Riley. One he identified as <i>Geomys
+bursarius</i> (p. 377) and the other (p. 380) he doubtfully referred to
+<i>Geomys breviceps</i>. Both specimens were obtained by Dr. W. A.
+Hammond. J. A. Allen (1874:49) reported pocket gophers from
+Kansas under the generic name "Geomys?". Professor M. V. B.
+Knox (1875:21) published a list of Kansas mammals in which he
+used the names <i>Geomys bursarius</i> Shaw and <i>Geomys breviceps</i>
+Baird, the last one for the specimen taken by Dr. Hammond, at
+Fort Riley. Baker (1889:57) employed the name <i>Geomys bursarius</i>
+Rich. for the gopher "found along the hundredth meridian, between
+N latitude 38&deg; 30' and 39&deg; 30'." He reported this animal as common
+in western Kansas. Merriam (1895:129) recorded <i>G. bursarius</i>
+and <i>G. lutescens</i> from Kansas. Allen (1895:265) recorded five
+specimens of <i>Geomys lutescens</i> collected between September 16 and
+October 13 at Long Island, Phillips County, Kansas, by W. W.
+Granger. Since that time several papers, some of them dealing
+mostly with habits of pocket gophers, have been published in which
+reference is made to <i>Geomys</i> in Kansas. Hibbard (1933:240) recognized
+three species: <i>G. bursarius</i>, <i>G. lutescens</i>, and <i>G. breviceps
+llanensis</i>. In 1944 (74-75) he recorded <i>Cratogeomys</i> from Meade
+County, on the basis of two skulls dug out of the ground, and he
+recognized the same three full species of the genus <i>Geomys</i> that he
+did in 1933, along with two additional subspecies.</p>
+
+<p>Specimens to the total number of 335 from Kansas have been
+available for the present study of the five subspecies recognized.
+The reason for arranging all of the named kinds as subspecies of a
+single species is that intergradation has been found to occur between
+<span class="pagenum">[220]</span>
+every pair of kinds having contiguous geographic ranges. The
+characters previously thought by some writers constantly to differentiate,
+say, <i>Geomys lutescens</i> of western Kansas from <i>Geomys bursarius</i>
+of eastern Kansas, prove not to do so; instead, in areas geographically
+intermediate between the geographic ranges of the two
+kinds, the pocket gophers are intermediate in morphological characters
+and therefore are regarded as intergrades. Intergradation of
+this kind here is accepted as the criterion of subspecies, and lack
+of such intergradation as the criterion of species. Search for structural
+characters, distinctive of the different kinds, additional to
+those characters noted by other writers, has resulted in the finding
+of a few such characters but they too are subject to intergradation.
+Therefore the several kinds are arranged as subspecies of a single
+species which takes the name <i>Geomys bursarius</i> because it is the
+oldest available name. Detailed comment on specimens showing
+intergradation are to be found in the accounts of <i>G. b. bursarius</i>
+and <i>G. b. major</i>.</p>
+
+<h2>METHODS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</h2>
+
+<p>The series with the largest number of individuals from one restricted
+locality was selected for initial study. These individuals
+were segregated by sex, and specimens of each sex were arranged
+from oldest to youngest. Each series was divided into age-groups,
+and within a given age-group of one sex from one locality of what
+was considered as one species, estimation was made of the amount
+of individual variation. Thus, it was possible when comparing different
+kinds of pocket gophers to use only one age class of one season
+of one sex.</p>
+
+<p>Age was estimated to some extent by size of animal and nature
+of its pelage. The immature pelage is grayer and the hair is more
+crinkled than in adults. A more certain guide to age, however, is
+furnished by the skull. With increasing age some sutures disappear,
+the rostrum increases in length and the ridges marking the limits
+of the temporal muscles come to fuse and eventually, in males,
+form a high sagittal crest.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size : .8em;">
+
+<p>Cranial measurements were taken as follows:</p>
+
+<p>Basilar length.&mdash;From the anteriormost inferior border of the foramen magnum
+to a line connecting the posteriormost margins of the alveoli of the first
+upper incisors.</p>
+
+<p>Length of the nasals.&mdash;The greatest length of the nasals.</p>
+
+<p>Zygomatic breadth.&mdash;The greatest distance across the zygomatic arches.</p>
+
+<p>Mastoid breadth.&mdash;The greatest distance across the mastoids.</p>
+<p> <span class="pagenum">[221]</span>
+Breadth of rostrum.&mdash;Width, perpendicular to long axis of the skull.</p>
+
+<p>Interorbital constriction.&mdash;The least distance between the orbits.</p>
+
+<p>Maxillary tooth row.&mdash;The greatest length of the upper molariform tooth
+row at the alveolar border.</p>
+
+<p>Extension of premaxillae posterior to nasals.&mdash;From the posteriormost border
+of the nasals to the posterior end of the extension of a premaxilla.</p>
+
+<p>Depth of skull.&mdash;From the median suture of the frontals, on the dorsal
+surface of the skull to the median suture of the palatines at the level of the
+first molar (not premolar).</p>
+
+<p>Length of rostrum.&mdash;From the anterior border of the nasal to the maxilla
+at the lateral end of the hamulus of the lacrimal.</p>
+
+<p>In the list of specimens examined, localities are arranged by counties from
+west to east, beginning at the northwestern corner of the state; specimens in
+each county are arranged from north to south. If several localities are in the
+same latitude, the westernmost is listed first. Capitalized color terms are after
+Ridgway, Color Standards and Color Nomenclature, Washington, D. C.,
+1912.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+ <img
+ border="0"
+ src="images/p005.jpg"
+ width="500" height="434"
+ alt="p005"
+ />
+
+<p class="caption">Fig. 1. Map showing the geographic distribution of the five
+subspecies of
+the Missipi Valley pocket gopher, <i>Geomys bursarius</i>, in Kansas, with insert
+showing range of the species.</p>
+
+</div>
+<p><span class="pagenum">[222]</span></p>
+<p>In connection with this study each of the authors acknowledges assistance
+from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation and one of us (Villa)
+is grateful for assistance also to Drs. Isaac Ochoterena and Roberto Llamas
+of the Biological Institute of Mexico. For the loan of specimens we are grateful
+to Dr. William B. Davis, of the Agricultural and Mechanical College of
+Texas; Dr. G. C. Rinker, of Hamilton, Kansas; and Mr. A. J. Kirn, of Somerset,
+Texas. Unless otherwise indicated, specimens are in the University of
+Kansas Museum of Natural History.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size: .8em">
+
+<h4>ACCOUNTS OF SUBSPECIES</h4>
+
+<p><b>Geomys bursarius lutescens</b> Merriam</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius lutescens</i> Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 4:51, October
+8, 1890; Scheffer, Technical Bull., U. S. Dept. Agric., 224:6, January,
+1931.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys lutescens</i> Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 8:127-29, January 31,
+1895; Lantz, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 19:175, 1905; Lantz, Kansas State
+Agric. College Bull., 129:335, April, 1905; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad.
+Sci., 36:240, 1933; Black, 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board Agric.,
+35:182, 1937; Swenk, Missouri Valley Fauna, 2:1, February 1, 1940; Allen,
+Kansas State Teachers College, Emporia, Bull. Inf. in Educ., 20 (no. 5):15,
+May, 1940; Hooper, Occas. Papers Mus. Zo&ouml;l., Univ. Michigan, 420:3,
+June 28, 1940.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys lutescens lutescens</i>, Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 47:74,
+1944.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Type locality.</i>&mdash;Sandhills on Birdwood Creek, Lincoln County, western Nebraska.</p>
+
+<p><i>Distribution in Kansas.</i>&mdash;Northwestern Kansas, eastward certainly to Ellis
+County, southward certainly to Scott County.</p>
+
+<p><i>Description.</i>&mdash;Animals with total length averaging no more than 272 mm.;
+length of vertebrae of tail averaging no more than 92; hind foot averaging no
+more than 35. Color: In autumn pelage, upper parts Light Ochraceous-Buff
+becoming Buckthorn Brown in middorsal region and there forming a faint
+longitudinal band; sides Pale Yellow Orange. In summer, Buckthorn Brown
+on upper parts with a dorsal band, especially distinct on specimens from Ellis
+and Trego counties; specimens from farther west lack the distinct dorsal band.
+Underparts Gray Drab and sometimes whitish, usually whitish in young specimens;
+basal color of pelage Deep Neutral Gray; fore and hind feet whitish.
+Skull: Zygomatic arch broadly and squarely spreading anteriorly; temporal
+impressions uniting to form a low sagittal crest in adult males, but in adult
+females and in young males the impressions usually remain apart; shape of
+interparietal varying from subquadrate in young specimens to subtriangular
+or triangular in adults; in some young specimens the interparietal is reduced
+to a minute, ovoid bone.</p>
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Comparisons.</i>&mdash;See comparisons in the accounts of other subspecies
+occurring in Kansas.</p>
+
+<p><i>Remarks.</i>&mdash;In his monographic revision of the pocket gophers,
+Merriam (1895:129) recorded 3 "typical or nearly typical" specimens
+from Trego County, and 18 "non typical" specimens as follows:
+Garden Plain, Sedgwick County, 4; Belle Plain, Sumner<span class="pagenum">[223]</span>
+County, 5; Cairo, Pratt County, 6; Kiowa, Barber County, 2; and
+Ellis, Ellis County, 1. A detailed discussion of Merriam's account
+of the distribution of <i>Geomys lutescens</i> in Kansas is given by Swenk
+(1940:11-12).</p>
+
+<p>Judging by specimens in the University of Kansas Museum of
+Natural History, <i>G. bursarius lutescens</i> in Kansas is restricted to
+the northwestern part of the state, reaching southward certainly to
+Scott County and eastward certainly to Ellis County; precise limits
+of distribution of this subspecies are unknown. Additional collecting
+is necessary to determine where the range of <i>lutescens</i> meets the
+ranges of the other subspecies. The specimens studied are remarkably
+uniform. One specimen obtained in October, in Trego County,
+is slightly lighter colored than any other from Kansas. In other
+characteristics it agrees with specimens from northwestern Kansas
+and from the type locality.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size : .8em;">
+
+<p><i>Specimens examined.</i>&mdash;Total number 32, as follows: <i>Cheyenne County</i>: 23 mi. (by road)
+NW St. Francis, 3. <i>Rawlins County</i>: 2 mi. NE Ludell, 10. <i>Logan County</i>: 5 mi. W Elkader,
+3; no locality more precise than county, 1. <i>Trego County</i>: Wakeeney, 4; 12 mi. S
+Collyer, Perrington Ranch, 3; no locality more precise than county, 5. <i>Scott County</i>: 4 mi.
+S Scott City, 2. <i>Ellis County</i>: Hays State College Campus, Hays, 1.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size: .8em">
+
+<h4>Geomys bursarius majusculus Swenk</h4>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius majusculus</i> Swenk, Missouri Valley Fauna, 1:6, December
+5, 1939; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 47:74, 1944.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius</i>, Baird, Expls. and surveys for a railroad route from
+the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, pt. 1, Mammals, 377, 1857;
+Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 8:120, January, 1895; Lantz, Trans. Kansas
+Acad. Sci., 19:175, 1905; Lantz, Kansas State Agric. College Bull., 129:335,
+April, 1905; Scheffer, Kansas State Agric. College Ento. and Zo&ouml;l. Dept.
+Bull., 172:199, September, 1910; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 36:240,
+1933; Allen, Kansas State Teachers College Emporia Bull. Inf. Stud.
+in Educ., 20 (no. 5):15, May, 1940.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius bursarius</i>, Black, 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas State
+Board Agric., 35:181, 1937.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys breviceps</i>, Baird, Expls. and surveys for a railroad route from
+the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, pt. 1, Mammals, 380, 1857.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Type locality.</i>&mdash;Lincoln, Lancaster County, Nebraska.</p>
+
+<p><i>Distribution in Kansas.</i>&mdash;Northeastern Kansas, westward certainly to Clay
+and Marion counties and southward certainly to Greenwood County.</p>
+
+<p><i>Description.</i>&mdash;Color: Upper parts Mummy Brown in fresh appearing pelage
+of February but in more worn pelage of March more reddish being near (16')
+Prout's Brown; top of head and sometimes back darker than rest of upper
+parts; underparts usually with some whitish anteriorly; fore and hind feet
+and approximately distal half of tail white. Size: Large, total length averaging
+more than 280 mm. in males and 257 in females; hind foot averaging
+35 mm. or more in males. Skull: Large; rostrum averaging more than twice
+as long as wide; sagittal crest high in males and barely present in females;
+occiput vertical when skull is laid top down; least width of braincase less than<span class="pagenum">[224]</span>
+distance from alveolus of upper incisor to middle of lateral border of P<sup>4</sup> at
+alveolar border.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Comparisons.</i>&mdash;From <i>Geomys bursarius lutescens</i>, <i>majusculus</i>
+differs as follows: Color darker, Mummy Brown to Prout's Brown
+instead of Buckthorn Brown. In both sexes: head and body a fifth
+to a sixth longer; hind foot 5 to 6 per cent longer; skull averaging
+larger in all parts measured except that premaxillae (in each subspecies)
+extend equally far posteriorly to nasals; diastema longer in
+relation to basilar length; rostrum longer relative to its width; sagittal
+crest higher; rostrum often more depressed distally; angle of
+suture between maxilla and jugal more obtuse.</p>
+
+<p>From <i>G. b. bursarius</i>, according to Swenk (1939:6), <i>majusculus</i>
+differs in larger size.</p>
+
+<p>From <i>G. b. illinoensis</i>, <i>majusculus</i>, according to Komarek and
+Spencer (1931:405), differs in brownish instead of slate-gray coloration
+and in two cranial characters as follows: Nasals straight-sided
+instead of shaped like an hour-glass, and superficial canals on palatine
+extending anteriorly beyond first molar, and from there anteriorly
+more or less separated. The first of these characters does not
+always hold; occasional individuals of <i>majusculus</i>, for example
+some from Douglas County, have the nasals shaped like an hour-glass.</p>
+
+<p>From <i>G. breviceps dutcheri</i>, <i>majusculus</i> differs in larger size
+(hind foot more than 33 mm. in males, and 29 in females; basilar
+length more than 42 mm. in males and 36 in females); dorsal exposure
+of jugal longer than width of rostrum measured between
+ventral margins of infraorbital foramina.</p>
+
+<p>From <i>G. bursarius major</i> of southcentral Kansas (for example
+Harvey County), <i>majusculus</i> differs in slightly darker color, being
+Mummy Brown instead of Prout's Brown; size larger (in males
+total length more than 284 mm., hind foot 35 or more, basilar length
+of skull more than 42, and in females total length 265 or more, hind
+foot averaging 33 or more, and basilar length 40 or more).</p>
+
+<p>Skull: Averaging larger in all parts measured, except that premaxillae
+do not extend so far posteriorly to nasals in either males
+or females; interorbital constriction slightly narrower in adult females;
+temporal ridges forming a more prominent sagittal crest in
+adult males (sagittal crest barely present in some adult males of
+<i>major</i> from Harper County).</p>
+
+<p><i>Remarks.</i>&mdash;In employing the subspecific name <i>majusculus</i> we are
+following Swenk (1939:6) who on the basis of larger size differentiated<span class="pagenum">[225]</span>
+the animals from southeastern South Dakota, the eastern
+parts of Nebraska and Kansas, and the western and southern parts
+of Iowa, from <i>G. bursarius bursarius</i> to which he assigned a more
+northern geographic range. In the absence of comparative materials
+of the northern subspecies we cannot make an independent decision
+on the validity of <i>majusculus</i> and recognize that if it is inseparable
+from <i>G. b. bursarius</i> the latter name will apply to
+specimens from northeastern Kansas. We are the more uncertain
+about applying the name <i>majusculus</i> to specimens from eastern
+Kansas because they average smaller than topotypes. Only at the
+northeasternmost locality in Kansas (3 mi. N Cummings, Atchison
+County) do specimens average as large as topotypes of <i>majusculus</i>.
+Farther southward they become progressively smaller in eastern
+Kansas, and we interpret this as intergradation with the still smaller
+subspecies <i>major</i>, to the southwest. The average external measurements
+of two adult males from Atchison County are: 321-99-35.
+Thirty-six miles farther south, in Douglas County, 16 adult males
+average 289-80-36. From Hamilton, Greenwood County, 80 miles
+farther southwest, nine adult males average 284-83-35. The maximum
+total length recorded at these three localities is: Atchison
+County, 342 (1 of 2 specimens), Douglas County, 308 (1 of 16
+specimens), Greenwood County, 357 (in coll. of Dr. Glenn C. Rinker
+and 1 of 15 males of all ages involved). It will be seen, therefore,
+that although there is a trend to smaller average size toward the
+southward, the maximum of 357 millimeters total length at Hamilton
+exceeds the maximum of 352 millimeters recorded by Swenk
+(1939:3) among 86 males at Lincoln where the recorded average is
+largest.</p>
+
+<p>Four specimens from Salina (Debold Farm) are intermediate
+structurally, as they are also geographically, between <i>G. b. majusculus</i>
+on the one hand and <i>Geomys bursarius lutescens</i> and <i>Geomys
+bursarius major</i> on the other hand. In color they agree with <i>majusculus</i>,
+as they do also in width of nasals posteriorly, in more obtuse
+angle of the rostrum and maxillary arm of the zygomatic arch. They
+agree with <i>G. b. lutescens</i> in having the occiput inclined anterodorsally,
+and are intermediate between <i>majusculus</i> and <i>lutescens</i>, but
+nearer the latter in size of skull and in length of the rostrum relative
+to its width.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size : .8em;">
+
+<p><i>Specimens examined.</i>&mdash;Total number, 148, as follows: <i>Clay County</i>: 6 mi. SW Clay
+Center, 3. <i>Jackson County</i>: 10-1/2 mi. WSW Holton, 1; no locality more precise than county,
+1. <i>Atchison County</i>: 3 mi. N Cummings, 2. <i>Jefferson County</i>: Oskaloosa, 1. <i>Leavenworth
+County</i>: Fort Leavenworth (Government Hill, 2; Engineer Hill, 1), 6; no locality more precise<span class="pagenum">[226]</span>
+than county, 19. <i>Saline County</i>: Salina, Debold Farm, 4 (coll. of A. J. Kirn). <i>Morris
+County</i>: 1-1/2 mi. N Council Grove, 3. <i>Douglas County</i>: 1 mi. NW Midland, 2; 1 mi. N
+Lawrence, 1; 2-1/2 mi. W Lawrence, 2; 1 mi. W K. U. Campus, 2; 1 mi. W Lawrence, 2; 1/2
+mi. W Lawrence, 2; "W K. U. Campus," 2; K. U. Campus, 4; Lawrence, 23; South Lawrence,
+1; 1/2 mi. SW K. U. Campus, 2; Southwest K. U. Campus, 1; Haskell Institute, 1;
+4-1/2 mi. S Lawrence, 1; 7 mi. SW Lawrence, 6; 7-1/2 mi. SW Lawrence, 1; 8 mi. SW Lawrence,
+1; 10 mi. S Lawrence, 1; 11 mi. SW Lawrence, 3; no locality more precise than
+county, 15. <i>Marion County</i>: 1-1/2 mi. NE Lincolnville, 6; 4 mi. SE Lincolnville, 1; 6 mi.
+S Lincolnville, 1. <i>Greenwood County</i>: Hamilton, 1; 1/2 mi. S Hamilton, 4; 1 mi. S Hamilton,
+4; 4 mi. S and 14 mi. W Hamilton, 6; 8 mi. SW Toronto, 1; 8-1/2 mi. SW Toronto, 5;
+no locality more precise than county, 6.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size: .8em">
+
+<h4>Geomys bursarius jugossicularis Hooper</h4>
+
+<p><i>Geomys lutescens jugossicularis</i> Hooper, Occas. Papers Mus. Zo&ouml;l., Univ.
+Michigan, no. 420: 1, June 28, 1940; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+vol. 47, p. 75, 1944.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Type locality.</i>&mdash;Lamar, Prowers County, Colorado.</p>
+
+<p><i>Distribution in Kansas.</i>&mdash;Extreme southwestern part of state, northward certainly
+to Hamilton County and south certainly to Morton and Seward counties.</p>
+
+<p><i>Description.</i>&mdash;A yellowish-cinnamon colored animal, with body of medium
+size, zygomatic plate of maxilla deep and mastoid process small.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Comparisons.</i>&mdash;Differs from <i>Geomys bursarius industrius</i> in
+slightly lighter color; occiput not strongly inclined anterodorsally.</p>
+
+<p>From <i>G. b. lutescens</i>, <i>jugossicularis</i> differs in less buffy coloration
+and deeper zygomatic plate of maxilla.</p>
+
+<p><i>Remarks.</i>&mdash;<i>G. bursarius jugossicularis</i> and <i>G. bursarius industrius</i>
+intergrade in the southern part of Meade County. Some specimens
+from this area show a coloration resembling that of <i>G. b. jugossicularis</i>;
+nevertheless, one specimen from Morton County has the occiput
+anterodorsally inclined as in <i>G. b. industrius</i>.</p>
+
+<p>Specimens examined from Hamilton County correspond closely to
+<i>G. b. jugossicularis</i>; they agree with it both in color and in cranial
+characters.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size : .8em;">
+
+<p><i>Specimens examined.</i>&mdash;Total number, 20, distributed as follows: <i>Hamilton County</i>: 1 mi.
+E Coolidge, Conard Farm, 4. <i>Morton County</i>: 12 mi. NE Elkhart, 2; Cimarron River, 12
+mi. N Elkhart, 4; no locality more precise than county, 6. <i>Seward County</i>: 1 mi. E
+Arkalon, 4.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size: .8em">
+
+<h4>Geomys bursarius industrius, new subspecies</h4>
+
+<p><i>Geomys lutescens</i> Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 8:127, January 31, 1895.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys breviceps llanensis</i>, Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 36:240,
+1933; Black, 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board Agric., 35:181. 1937.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys lutescens jugossicularis</i> Hooper, Occas. Papers Mus. Zo&ouml;l.,
+Univ. Michigan, 420:1, June 28, 1940.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Type.</i>&mdash;Male, adult, skin and skull, no. 14083 Museum of Natural History,
+University of Kansas; from 1-1/2 miles north of Fowler, Meade County, Kansas;
+obtained December 30, 1941, by H. H. Hildebrand, original number 16.</p>
+
+<p><i>Distribution in Kansas.</i>&mdash;Southwestern Kansas from Meade County eastward<span class="pagenum">[227]</span>
+certainly to Pratt and Clark counties; from Pawnee County southward
+probably to the Oklahoma boundary.</p>
+
+<p><i>Diagnosis.</i>&mdash;Size of body medium; color of upper parts Cinnamon Brown;
+skull with occiput strongly inclined anterodorsally in males.</p>
+
+<div class="figcenter">
+ <img
+ border="0"
+ src="images/p011.jpg"
+ width="500" height="471"
+ alt="p011"
+ />
+</div>
+
+<p class="caption">Fig. 2 Three views of the skull of the type specimen of <i>Geomys bursarius industrius.</i>
+<br />
+A. Lateral view;
+<br />
+B. Dorsal view;
+<br />
+C. Ventral view.
+</p>
+
+<p><i>Description.</i>&mdash;Color: Upper parts Cinnamon Brown, slightly reddish, but
+in some specimens collected in September, in Pawnee County, near (15&acute; <i>i</i>)
+Ochraceous-Tawny; underparts usually Wood Brown, somewhat whitish anteriorly;
+forefeet white; hind feet and approximately distal half of tail whitish.
+Size: Medium (see measurements), total length averaging not more
+than 271 mm. in males and 254 in females; hind foot averaging not more
+than 35 mm. in males and less than 32 in females. Skull: In males, least
+width of braincase equal to distance from alveolus of incisor to anterior border
+of alveolus of first upper molar, occiput strongly inclined anterodorsally, temporal
+impressions usually united in a low sagittal crest, zygomatic arch heavy
+and curved at level of jugal bone. In adult females least width of braincase
+approximately equal to distance from alveolus of incisor to anterior border
+of alveolus of first upper molar (not premolar); occiput less inclined anterodorsally<span class="pagenum">[228]</span>
+than in males; temporal ridges not forming a sagittal crest. In young
+females the width of the braincase is more than the distance between the
+alveoli of the incisor and first molar.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Comparisons.</i>&mdash;<i>G. lutescens industrius</i> differs from <i>G. lutescens
+lutescens</i> in: Color darker; least width of braincase not equal to
+(usually more than) the distance from the alveolus of incisor to
+the anterior border of the alveolus of the first upper molar.</p>
+
+<p><i>G. lutescens industrius</i> differs from <i>G. lutescens jugossicularis</i> in:
+Color slightly darker, the former being Cinnamon Brown instead of
+Vinaceous Cinnamon, with hairs basally Deep Neutral Gray in upper
+parts and underparts. Skull: Jugular part of zygomatic arch
+more curved (convex dorsally) and occiput far more inclined anterodorsally;
+lower part of mastoidal ridge more prominent.</p>
+
+<p>For comparison with <i>G. l. major</i>, see account of that subspecies.</p>
+
+<p><i>Remarks.</i>&mdash;Judging from the known specimens of this subspecies,
+it has the smallest geographic range of any of the subspecies in
+Kansas, but additional collecting in Hodgeman County and counties
+to the north and west of it may extend the known range in those
+directions; collecting in Comanche County and in adjoining parts
+of Oklahoma may extend the known range to the southward.</p>
+
+<p>The anterodorsal inclination of the occiput in males is the one
+cranial character in which <i>industrius</i> differs from all of the subspecies
+with adjoining geographic ranges. The existence of this
+unique (among adjoining subspecies) cranial character is the principal
+reason for according subspecific status to this animal. Although
+it has other characters which are fairly uniform over a
+considerable geographic area, these other characters, namely, Cinnamon
+Brown color of the upper parts and medium size of the body,
+after all, are conditions intermediate between those in <i>jugossicularis</i>
+to the west and those in the darker and larger animals assigned
+to <i>major</i> to the eastward. Considering the intermediate geographic
+position of <i>industrius</i>, the color and size are approximately what a
+person would predict by study of only the animals to the west and
+those to the east. Therefore, the color and size probably are indicative
+of intergradation between <i>jugossicularis</i> and <i>major</i>. Still,
+there is the anterodorsally inclined occiput in males&mdash;a character
+of a unique sort&mdash;and this influences us to give subspecific status to
+this animal with full recognition of the fact that it is a "weak" subspecies
+as compared with any one of the adjoining subspecies.</p>
+
+<p>Hooper (1940:2) in naming as new <i>Geomys lutescens jugossicularis</i>
+referred to his new subspecies a skin-only from Meade County<span class="pagenum">[229]</span>
+State Park. Our more abundant material from there shows the
+cranial conformation to be that of <i>industrius</i> to which we accordingly
+assign the specimens. However, with only a skin available,
+we, too, would have used the name <i>jugossicularis</i> because the color
+is paler than in other specimens of <i>industrius</i> and this paleness indicates
+intergradation between the two named subspecies. Specimens
+from Pratt County are slightly darker than <i>industrius</i> thereby
+indicating intergradation between <i>industrius</i> and <i>major</i>.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size : .8em;">
+
+<p><i>Specimens examined.</i>&mdash;Total number, 58, distributed as follows: <i>Pawnee County</i>: Jct.
+Pawnee and Arkansas rivers, Larned, 6; 1 mi. S and 1 mi. E Larned, 7. <i>Edwards County</i>:
+1 mi. W and 3-1/2 mi. S Kinsley, 1. <i>Kiowa County</i>: Rezeau Ranch, 5 mi. N Belvidere, 2.
+<i>Pratt County</i>: Pratt, 14; no locality more precise than county, 1. <i>Meade County</i>: 3-1/2 mi.
+NE Fowler, 2; 2 mi. N Fowler, 2; 1-1/2 mi. N Fowler, 2; 1-1/4 mi. N and 3/4 mi. E Fowler,
+2; 7 mi. N Meade, Cudahy Ash Pit, 2; 13 mi. SW Meade, 9; State Lake, 2; State Park, 4.
+<i>Clark County</i>: 7 mi. SW Kingsdown, E. A. Stephenson Ranch, 1; 6 mi. S Kingsdown, 1.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size: .8em">
+
+<h4>Geomys bursarius major Davis</h4>
+
+<p><i>Geomys lutescens major</i> Davis, Texas Agric. Exp. St., Bull. no. 590:32,
+August, 1940; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 47:75, 1944.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys lutescens</i> Merriam, N. Amer. Fauna, 8:129, January 31, 1895.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys breviceps llanensis</i>, Lantz, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 20 (pt. 2):
+215, 1907; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 36:240, 1933; Black, 30th
+Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board Agric., 35:182, 1937; Swenk, Missouri
+Valley Fauna, 2:12, February 1, 1940.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Type locality.</i>&mdash;Eight miles west of Clarendon, Donley County, Texas.</p>
+
+<p><i>Distribution in Kansas.</i>&mdash;Southcentral Kansas, northward certainly to Ellsworth
+County, westward certainly to Stafford and Barber counties and eastward
+to Cowley County.</p>
+
+<p><i>Description.</i>&mdash;Color: Upper parts varying from Brussels Brown in some
+specimens to nearly Prout's Brown, especially in specimens from central part
+of state. Top of head, and sometimes back, darker than rest of upper parts,
+but no well defined black stripe; underparts varying from whitish to nearly
+Buffy Brown; fore and hind feet and approximately distal half of tail white.
+Size: Large (see measurements). Skull: Sagittal crest absent in females and
+barely present in males; least width of braincase more than distance from alveolus
+of incisor to middle of lateral border of P<sup>4</sup> at alveolar border. Length
+of auditory bulla (from anteroventral edge of paroccipital process of exoccipital
+to hamulus of peterygoid), in each sex, more than 8 mm.; occiput usually
+vertical when skull is laid top down; zygomatic arch broadly and squarely
+spreading, divergent anteriorly; rostrum averaging less than twice as long as
+wide.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<p><i>Comparisons.</i>&mdash;From <i>G. bursarius lutescens</i>, <i>major</i> differs in color
+darker, premaxillae extending slightly farther posteriorly; temporal
+impressions usually forming a more well-marked sagittal crest in
+males; ventral side of zygomatic arch, at level of jugal bone, more
+curved.</p>
+
+<p>From <i>G. bursarius majusculus</i>, <i>major</i> differs in slightly lighter<span class="pagenum">[230]</span>
+color, smaller size of body; in males, total length less than 284 mm.;
+hind foot 34 or less; basilar length of skull less than 42; in females
+total length less than 264, hind foot no more than 33, and basilar
+length less than 39.</p>
+
+<p>From <i>G. bursarius industrius</i>, <i>major</i> differs in color, being Prout's
+Brown, instead of Cinnamon Brown (less Fuscous); body averaging
+10 per cent longer; total length in males from 9 to 9.7 per cent
+longer, hind foot 9.7 per cent longer on the average; skull averaging
+larger in all parts measured. Occiput less inclined anterodorsally;
+top nearly flat, less arched than that of <i>G. b. industrius</i>; auditory
+bulla averaging slightly larger and less inflated.</p>
+
+<p><i>Remarks.</i>&mdash;Specimens of this subspecies from Norman, Cleveland
+County, Oklahoma, and Canton, Dewey County, Oklahoma, and
+most of those from Kansas, are more Fuscous than topotypes and
+tend toward <i>G. bursarius majusculus</i>. Specimens from McPherson
+County have a darker dorsal stripe resembling that of <i>G. bursarius
+majusculus</i>. One adult from Little Salt Marsh, Stafford County, is
+pale, closely resembling topotypes.</p>
+
+<p>Most of the cranial characters, nevertheless, are constant in all
+available specimens, except that in specimens of each sex from the
+type locality the basilar length averages 4 to 5 per cent shorter. In
+the constancy of size of the relatively large auditory bullae and in
+the nearly flat dorsal profile of the cranial part of the skull, the
+specimens from Kansas agree with the specimens from the type
+locality.</p>
+
+<p>Specimens from Harper County have the occiput slightly inclined
+anterodorsally and thus are reminiscent of <i>industrius</i> which has an
+even greater inclination of the occiput. Probably the appearance
+in dilute fashion of this character in Harper County is properly to
+be interpreted as intergradation with <i>industrius</i>. If so, the actual
+intergradation may be to the northwest <i>via</i> Pratt County since
+specimens from Barber County, immediately west of Harper and
+lying between Harper County and the range of <i>industrius</i>, do not
+have the occiput so inclined.</p>
+
+<p>Of a pair of adults from eight miles west of Rosalia, Butler
+County, the female is indistinguishable in color from adults of <i>G. b.
+industrius</i> from northern Meade County and from two specimens
+from eleven miles west of Clarendon, Donley County, Texas, near
+the type locality of <i>G. b. major</i>. The male from eight miles west of
+Rosalia is darker as compared either with <i>G. b. industrius</i> or <i>G. b.
+major</i> and the coloration of the upper parts resembles those in <i>G. b.</i><span class="pagenum">[231]</span>
+<i>majusculus</i>; the underparts are only slightly paler than the upper
+parts as in <i>majusculus</i>. Measurements of the skulls are intermediate
+between the averages for <i>G. b. majusculus</i> and those for <i>G. b.
+major</i>. These specimens from eight miles west of Rosalia are intermediate
+structurally, and since they are intermediate geographically
+between <i>G. b. majusculus</i> and <i>G. b. major</i>, they suggest intergradation
+of the two subspecies. The specimens in question are referred
+to <i>major</i> because the size is nearer that of <i>major</i>. It is
+mainly the intermediate nature of these two specimens from Butler
+County, and the intermediate nature of the specimens from McPherson
+County, Kansas, that have caused us to treat <i>G. b. majusculus</i>
+as only subspecifically distinct from the more western subspecies,
+<i>major</i>.</p>
+
+<div
+ style="margin-left: 1em;
+ margin-right: 1em;
+ font-size : .8em;">
+
+<p><i>Specimens examined.</i>&mdash;Total number, 77, as follows: <i>Ellsworth County</i>: 2 mi. S Ellsworth,
+1. <i>McPherson County</i>: Smoky Hill River, 1 mi. S and 1/2 mi. W Lindsborg, 5; 1/2
+mi. E McPherson, 1. <i>Stafford County</i>: Little Salt Marsh, 12; no locality more precise than
+county, 3. <i>Reno County</i>: 8 mi. N and 1 mi. E Haven, 2. <i>Harvey County</i>: 1 mi. E and 1/2
+mi. N Halstead, 1; Halstead, 3. <i>Butler County</i>: 8 mi. W Rosalia, 2. <i>Barber County</i>:
+near South Bridge, Sun City, 1; 2 mi. S Sun City, 1; Wells Ranch, Aetna, 5; "1 mi. W
+Aetna," 3; near South Bridge, Aetna, 1; near Bridge, 1 mi. S Aetna, 2. <i>Harper County</i>:
+4-1/2 mi. NE Danville, 8; 1 mi. N Harper, 11; 3 mi. S Harper, 1. <i>Cowley County</i>: 3 mi.
+SW Arkansas City, 4; 3 mi. SE Arkansas City, 9; 3 mi. S Arkansas City, 1.</p>
+
+
+</div>
+
+<hr class="chapter" />
+
+<h4>Measurements of Adult Males of Geomys</h4>
+
+<h5>
+ (In millimeters)
+ <span class="pagenum">[232]</span>
+</h5>
+
+<table border="0"
+ cellpadding="2"
+ cellspacing="0"
+ width="100%"
+ summary="Measurements of Adult Males of Geomys">
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Key for table headings in table on this page.</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>&nbsp;</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">N: Number of individuals averaged or catalogue number</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">L: Total length</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">T: Length of tail</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">H: Length of hind foot</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">B: Basilar length</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Na: Length of nasals</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Z: Zygomatic breadth</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">M: Mastoid breadth</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Rb: Breadth of rostrum</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">I: Interorbital constriction</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">A: Alveolar length of maxillary tooth row</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">E: Extension of premaxilla posterior to nasals</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">S: Depth of skull</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Rl: Length of rostrum</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>&nbsp;</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">N&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">L</td>
+ <td class="tdc">T</td>
+ <td class="tdc">H</td>
+ <td class="tdc">B</td>
+ <td class="tdc">Na</td>
+ <td class="tdc">Z</td>
+ <td class="tdc">M</td>
+ <td class="tdc">Rb</td>
+ <td class="tdc">I</td>
+ <td class="tdc">A</td>
+ <td class="tdc">E</td>
+ <td class="tdc">S</td>
+ <td class="tdc">Rl</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. lutescens</i>; topotypes</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">5&nbsp;ave.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">266</td>
+ <td class="tdr">82.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">34.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">40.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">11.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">20.8</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">min.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">257</td>
+ <td class="tdr">76.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">33.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">38.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">29.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">11.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.1</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">max.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">276</td>
+ <td class="tdr">91.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">36.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">42.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">20.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">31.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">27.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">11.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">23.6</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>2 mi. NE Ludell, Rawlins Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">12088</td>
+ <td class="tdr">272</td>
+ <td class="tdr">92.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">35.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">43.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">27.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">11.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">2.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">22.1</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. majusculus</i>; Douglas Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">16&nbsp;ave.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">289</td>
+ <td class="tdr">79.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">36.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">47.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">21.0</td>
+ <td>34.1<a name="FNanchor_A_1" id="FNanchor_A_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_A_1" class="fnanchor">A</a></td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">12.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.9</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">min.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">273</td>
+ <td class="tdr">70.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">44.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">27.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">11.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">2.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">22.9</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">max.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">308</td>
+ <td class="tdr">95.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">55.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">49.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">23.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">38.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">34.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">13.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">7.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">20.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">28.1</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. jugossicularis</i>; Morton Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">4&nbsp;ave.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">265</td>
+ <td class="tdr">82.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">34.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">40.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">27.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">21.2</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">min.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">250</td>
+ <td class="tdr">68.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">38.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">29.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">27.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">20.2</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">max.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">285</td>
+ <td class="tdr">92.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">37.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">42.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">31.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">28.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">11.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">22.0</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. industrius</i>; Meade Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">8&nbsp;ave.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">265</td>
+ <td class="tdr">82.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">35.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">40.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">28.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">11.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">21.8</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">min.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">247</td>
+ <td class="tdr">70.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">33.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">37.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">28.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">2.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.5</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">max.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">280</td>
+ <td class="tdr">90.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">36.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">43.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">21.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">29.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">11.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">7.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.2</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. major</i>; Wells Ranch, Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">11724</td>
+ <td class="tdr">256</td>
+ <td class="tdr">66.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">34.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">41.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">31.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">28.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">21.3</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>1 mi. W Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">11153</td>
+ <td class="tdr">240</td>
+ <td class="tdr">75.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">36.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.5</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">11152</td>
+ <td class="tdr">240</td>
+ <td class="tdr">65.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">36.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">14.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.5</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>3 mi. SE Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">12870</td>
+ <td class="tdr">246</td>
+ <td class="tdr">76.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">42.1</td>
+ <td>16.0<a name="FNanchor_E_5" id="FNanchor_E_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_E_5" class="fnanchor">E</a></td>
+ <td class="tdr">33.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">29.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">11.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">21.3</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>3 mi. SW Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">12892</td>
+ <td class="tdr">282</td>
+ <td class="tdr">84.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">33.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">41.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">....</td>
+ <td class="tdr">27.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">21.5</td>
+ </tr>
+</table>
+
+<p>
+ <span class="pagenum">
+ [233]
+ </span>
+</p>
+
+<hr class="chapter" />
+
+<h4>Measurements of Adult Females of Geomys</h4>
+
+<h5>(In millimeters)</h5>
+
+<table border="0"
+ cellpadding="2"
+ cellspacing="0"
+ width="95%"
+ summary="Measurements of Adult Females of Geomys">
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Key for table headings in table on this page.</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>&nbsp;</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">N: Number of individuals averaged or catalogue number</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">L: Total length</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">T: Length of tail</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">H: Length of hind foot</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">B: Basilar length</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Na: Length of nasals</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Z: Zygomatic breadth</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">M: Mastoid breadth</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Rb: Breadth of rostrum</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">I: Interorbital constriction</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">A: Alveolar length of maxillary tooth row</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">E: Extension of premaxilla posterior to nasals</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">S: Depth of skull</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14">Rl: Length of rostrum</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>&nbsp;</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">N&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
+ <td class="tdc">L</td>
+ <td class="tdc">T</td>
+ <td class="tdc">H</td>
+ <td class="tdc">B</td>
+ <td class="tdc">Na</td>
+ <td class="tdc">Z</td>
+ <td class="tdc">M</td>
+ <td class="tdc">Rb</td>
+ <td class="tdc">I</td>
+ <td class="tdc">A</td>
+ <td class="tdc">E</td>
+ <td class="tdc">S</td>
+ <td class="tdc">Rl</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. lutescens</i>; topotypes</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">6&nbsp;ave.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">233</td>
+ <td class="tdr">72.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">31.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">35.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">23.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.4</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">min.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">215</td>
+ <td class="tdr">63.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">33.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">13.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">21.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">2.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">14.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.3</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">max.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">254</td>
+ <td class="tdr">76.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">37.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.8</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>2 mi. NE Ludell, Rawlins Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">11733</td>
+ <td class="tdr">230</td>
+ <td class="tdr">63.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">31.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">35.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">7.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">2.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.2</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">12155</td>
+ <td class="tdr">245</td>
+ <td class="tdr">70.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">35.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">14.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">7.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">14.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.2</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. majusculus</i>; Douglas Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">17&nbsp;ave.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">265</td>
+ <td class="tdr">78.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.8</td>
+ <td>40.6<a name="FNanchor_B_2" id="FNanchor_B_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_B_2" class="fnanchor">B</a></td>
+ <td>17.2<a href="#Footnote_B_2" class="fnanchor">B</a></td>
+ <td>28.6<a href="#Footnote_A_1" class="fnanchor">A</a></td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">21.0</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">min.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">222</td>
+ <td class="tdr">59.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">37.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">2.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.8</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. jugossicularis</i>; Morton Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">5012</td>
+ <td class="tdr">244</td>
+ <td class="tdr">72.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">36.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.3</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">5395</td>
+ <td class="tdr">230</td>
+ <td class="tdr">72.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">34.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">13.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.5</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. industrius</i>; Meade Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">7&nbsp;ave.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">238</td>
+ <td>73.0<a name="FNanchor_C_3" id="FNanchor_C_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_C_3" class="fnanchor">C</a></td>
+ <td class="tdr">31.3</td>
+ <td>36.4<a name="FNanchor_D_4" id="FNanchor_D_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_D_4" class="fnanchor">D</a></td>
+ <td class="tdr">14.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.3</td>
+ <td>24.8<a href="#Footnote_D_4" class="fnanchor">D</a></td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.6</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">min.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">231</td>
+ <td class="tdr">65.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">35.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">14.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.5</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">max.</td>
+ <td class="tdr">256</td>
+ <td class="tdr">75.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">37.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">27.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.9</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5><i>G. b. major</i>; 1 mi. S Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">10069</td>
+ <td class="tdr">257</td>
+ <td class="tdr">95.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">37.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.4</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">10070</td>
+ <td class="tdr">242</td>
+ <td class="tdr">83.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">36.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.1</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>Wells Ranch, Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">12238</td>
+ <td class="tdr">239</td>
+ <td class="tdr">65.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">31.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">34.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">14.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">23.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.7</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>1 mi. S.Sun City, Barber Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">11075</td>
+ <td class="tdr">232</td>
+ <td class="tdr">66.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">28.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">34.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">14.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">23.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">5.9</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">3.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">17.0</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>3 mi. SW Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">12872</td>
+ <td class="tdr">242</td>
+ <td class="tdr">66.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">38.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">28.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">26.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.3</td>
+ <td class="tdr">7.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.1</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.1</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="14"><h5>3 mi. SE Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas</h5></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">12894</td>
+ <td class="tdr">230</td>
+ <td class="tdr">82.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">30.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">38.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">28.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">10.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">16.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">19.5</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td class="tdr">12893</td>
+ <td class="tdr">246</td>
+ <td class="tdr">83.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">32.0</td>
+ <td class="tdr">36.5</td>
+ <td class="tdr">14.2</td>
+ <td class="tdr">25.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">24.8</td>
+ <td class="tdr">9.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">6.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">8.7</td>
+ <td class="tdr">4.6</td>
+ <td class="tdr">15.4</td>
+ <td class="tdr">18.1</td>
+ </tr>
+</table>
+
+<hr class="chapter" />
+
+<p class="h3">Footnotes</p>
+
+<a href="#Footnote_A_1" class="fnanchor"></a>
+<div class="footnote">
+ <p>
+ <a name="Footnote_A_1" id="Footnote_A_1"></a>
+ <a href="#FNanchor_A_1">
+ <span class="label">A</span>
+ </a>
+ 15 averaged.
+ </p>
+</div>
+
+<a href="#Footnote_B_2" class="fnanchor"></a>
+<div class="footnote">
+ <p>
+ <a name="Footnote_B_2" id="Footnote_B_2"></a>
+ <a href="#FNanchor_B_2">
+ <span class="label">B</span>
+ </a>
+ 16 averaged.
+ </p>
+</div>
+
+<a href="#Footnote_C_3" class="fnanchor"></a>
+<div class="footnote">
+<p>
+ <a name="Footnote_C_3" id="Footnote_C_3"></a>
+ <a href="#FNanchor_C_3">
+ <span class="label">C</span>
+ </a>
+ 6 averaged.
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<a href="#Footnote_D_4" class="fnanchor"></a>
+<div class="footnote">
+ <p>
+ <a name="Footnote_D_4" id="Footnote_D_4"></a>
+ <a href="#FNanchor_D_4">
+ <span class="label">D</span>
+ </a>
+ 5 averaged.
+ </p>
+</div>
+
+<a href="#Footnote_E_5" class="fnanchor"></a>
+<div class="footnote">
+<p>
+ <a name="Footnote_E_5" id="Footnote_E_5"></a>
+ <a href="#FNanchor_E_5">
+ <span class="label">E</span>
+ </a>
+ approximate.
+ <span class="pagenum">[234]</span>
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<hr class="chapter" />
+
+<h2>SUBSPECIES OF THE SPECIES GEOMYS BURSARIUS</h2>
+
+<p>If <i>Geomys lutescens major</i> Davis is correctly judged to intergrade
+with <i>Geomys bursarius majusculus</i> Swenk, the name for the full
+species will be <i>Geomys bursarius</i> because <i>bursarius</i> is the oldest
+name among those available. Some new combinations of names
+are required. According to our present understanding, the eleven
+kinds of pocket gophers named below are properly to be arranged
+as subspecies of the species <i>Geomys bursarius</i>:</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius bursarius</i> (Shaw). Type from unknown locality in Upper
+Mississippi Valley.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius majusculus</i> Swenk. Type from Lincoln, Lancaster
+County, Nebraska.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius hylaeus</i> Blossom. Type from 10 mi. S Chadron, Dawes
+County, Nebraska.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius levisagittalis</i> Swenk. Type from Spencer, Boyd County,
+Nebraska.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius vinaceus</i> Swenk. Type from Scottsbluff, Scotts Bluff
+County, Nebraska.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius lutescens</i> Merriam. Type from Sandhills on Birdwood
+Creek, Lincoln County, Nebraska.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius illinoensis</i> Komarek and Spencer. Type from 1 mi. S
+Momence, Kankakee County, Illinois.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius jugossicularis</i> Hooper. Type from Lamar, Prowers
+County, Colorado.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius industrius</i> new subspecies. Type from 1-1/2 mi. N Fowler,
+Meade County, Kansas.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius major</i> Davis. Type from 8 mi. W Clarendon, Donley
+County, Texas.</p>
+
+<p><i>Geomys bursarius llanensis</i> Bailey. Type from Llano, Llano County, Texas.<span class="pagenum">[235]</span></p>
+
+<br /> <br />
+
+<p class="h4">LITERATURE CITED</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Allen, J. A.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1874. Notes on the mammals of portions of Kansas, Colorado, Wyoming
+and Utah. Part I. On the mammals of middle and western Kansas.
+Bull. Essex Inst., 6 (no. 2):43-52. February, 1874.</p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1895. List of mammals collected in the Black Hills region of South Dakota
+and in western Kansas by Mr. Walter W. Granger with field notes
+by the collector. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 7:259-274. August 21,
+1895.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Allen, P.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1940. Kansas mammals. Kansas State Teachers College, Emporia, Bull.
+Inf. Stud. in Educ., Number 20 (no. 5):l-62. May, 1940.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Baker, A. B.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1889. Mammals of western Kansas. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 11:56-58
+(for 1887-88).</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Baird, S. F.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1857. Explorations and surveys for a railroad route from the Mississippi
+River to the Pacific Ocean. War Department. Mammals, Part I,
+xxxii + 757, pls. 17-60, 35 figs. in text, 1857.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Black, J. D.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1937. Mammals of Kansas. Thirtieth Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board of
+Agric., 35:116-217.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Davis, W. B.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1940. Distribution and variation of pocket gophers (Genus Geomys) in the
+southwestern United States. Texas Agric. Exp. Station, Bull., 590:1-38,
+6 figs. in text. October 23, 1940.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Hibbard, C. W.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1933. A revised check list of Kansas mammals. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+36:230-249.</p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1944. A checklist of Kansas mammals, 1943. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+47:61-88.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Hooper, E. T.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1940. A new race of pocket gopher of the species Geomys lutescens from
+Colorado. Occas. Papers, Mus. Zo&ouml;l., Univ. Michigan, 420:1-3. June
+28, 1940.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Knox, M. V. B.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1875. Kansas Mammalia. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 4:18-22.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Komarek, E. V.</span>, and <span class="smcap">Spencer, D. A.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1931. A new pocket gopher from Illinois and Indiana. Journ. Mamm., 12:404-408,
+1 pl., 1 fig. in text. November 11, 1931.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Lantz, D. E.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1905. Kansas mammals in their relations to agriculture. Kansas State
+Agric. College Bull., 129:331-404. April, 1905.</p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1905. A list of Kansas mammals. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 19:171-178.</p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1907. Additions and corrections to the list of Kansas mammals. Trans.
+Kansas Acad. Sci., 20 (pt. 2):214-217.<span class="pagenum">[236]</span></p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Merriam, C. H.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1890. Descriptions of twenty-six new species of North American mammals.
+N. Amer. Fauna, 4: v + 60, 3 pls., 3 figs. in text. October 8, 1890.</p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1895. Monographic revision of the pocket gopher Family Geomyidae....
+N. Amer. Fauna, 8:1-258, 19 pls. and frontispiece, 71 figs. in text, 4
+maps. January 31, 1895.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Scheffer, T. H.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1910. The pocket gopher. Kansas State Agric. Coll. Ent. and Zo&ouml;l. Dept.,
+Bull., 172:197-233, illustrated. September, 1910.</p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1931. Habits and economic status of the pocket gophers. U. S. Dept. Agric.,
+Tech. Bull., 224:1-27, 8 pls., 2 figs. in text. January, 1931.</p>
+
+<p class="noin"><span class="smcap">Swenk, M. H.</span></p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1939. A study of local size variations in the prairie pocket gopher (Geomys
+bursarius), with description of a new subspecies from Nebraska. Missouri
+Valley Fauna, 1:1-8. December 5, 1939.</p>
+
+<p class="outdent">1940. A study of subspecific variation in the yellow pocket gopher (Geomys
+lutescens) in Nebraska, and the geographical and ecological distribution
+of the variants. Missouri Valley Fauna, 2:1-12. February 1,
+1940.</p>
+
+<p><i>Transmitted May 30, 1947.</i></p>
+
+<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
+
+<p class="h6">PRINTED BY
+<br />
+FRED VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER
+<br />
+TOPEKA, KANSAS
+<br />
+1947
+<br />
+21-8188</p>
+
+</div>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of
+Kansas, [KU. Vol. 1 No. 11], by Bernardo Villa-R and E. Raymond Hall
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK POCKET GOPHERS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 36653-h.htm or 36653-h.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/6/6/5/36653/
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Matthew Wheaton
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
+</pre>
+
+</body>
+</html>
diff --git a/36653-h/images/decoration.png b/36653-h/images/decoration.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e5a8688
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36653-h/images/decoration.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36653-h/images/p005.jpg b/36653-h/images/p005.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0b35600
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36653-h/images/p005.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36653-h/images/p011.jpg b/36653-h/images/p011.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..efa8ade
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36653-h/images/p011.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/36653.txt b/36653.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..abf83b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36653.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,1395 @@
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas,
+[KU. Vol. 1 No. 11], by Bernardo Villa-R and E. Raymond Hall
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+
+Title: Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas, [KU. Vol. 1 No. 11]
+
+Author: Bernardo Villa-R
+ E. Raymond Hall
+
+Release Date: July 7, 2011 [EBook #36653]
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+
+*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK POCKET GOPHERS ***
+
+
+
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Matthew Wheaton
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ SUBSPECIATION IN POCKET GOPHERS OF KANSAS
+
+ By BERNARDO VILLA-R. and E. RAYMOND HALL
+
+
+ University of Kansas Publications
+ Museum of Natural History
+
+ Volume 1, No. 11, pp. 217-236
+ November 29, 1947
+
+ UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
+ LAWRENCE
+ 1947
+
+ UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS, MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
+ Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, H. H. Lane, and Edward H. Taylor
+ Volume 1, No. 11, pp. 217-236
+ Published November 29, 1947
+
+ UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
+ Lawrence, Kansas
+
+ PRINTED BY
+ FRED VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER
+ TOPEKA, KANSAS
+ 1947
+
+ 21-8188
+
+
+
+
+Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of Kansas
+
+By BERNARDO VILLA-R. AND E. RAYMOND HALL
+
+
+Several full species of the genus _Geomys_ have been recorded from
+Kansas. The purpose of the study now reported upon was to determine the
+present taxonomic status of these animals and the distribution of each
+within the boundaries of Kansas. No pocket gopher of any kind has been
+reported from the southeastern part of the state; in all other parts
+_Geomys_ is locally common.
+
+
+
+
+HISTORY
+
+
+The first published reference that we have found to pocket gophers of
+Kansas is Prof. Spencer F. Baird's (1857:377, 380) mention of two
+specimens from Fort Riley. One he identified as _Geomys bursarius_ (p.
+377) and the other (p. 380) he doubtfully referred to _Geomys
+breviceps_. Both specimens were obtained by Dr. W. A. Hammond. J. A.
+Allen (1874:49) reported pocket gophers from Kansas under the generic
+name "Geomys?". Professor M. V. B. Knox (1875:21) published a list of
+Kansas mammals in which he used the names _Geomys bursarius_ Shaw and
+_Geomys breviceps_ Baird, the last one for the specimen taken by Dr.
+Hammond, at Fort Riley. Baker (1889:57) employed the name _Geomys
+bursarius_ Rich. for the gopher "found along the hundredth meridian,
+between N latitude 38 deg. 30' and 39 deg. 30'." He reported this animal as
+common in western Kansas. Merriam (1895:129) recorded _G. bursarius_ and
+_G. lutescens_ from Kansas. Allen (1895:265) recorded five specimens of
+_Geomys lutescens_ collected between September 16 and October 13 at Long
+Island, Phillips County, Kansas, by W. W. Granger. Since that time
+several papers, some of them dealing mostly with habits of pocket
+gophers, have been published in which reference is made to _Geomys_ in
+Kansas. Hibbard (1933:240) recognized three species: _G. bursarius_, _G.
+lutescens_, and _G. breviceps llanensis_. In 1944 (74-75) he recorded
+_Cratogeomys_ from Meade County, on the basis of two skulls dug out of
+the ground, and he recognized the same three full species of the genus
+_Geomys_ that he did in 1933, along with two additional subspecies.
+
+Specimens to the total number of 335 from Kansas have been available
+for the present study of the five subspecies recognized. The reason for
+arranging all of the named kinds as subspecies of a single species is
+that intergradation has been found to occur between every pair of kinds
+having contiguous geographic ranges. The characters previously thought
+by some writers constantly to differentiate, say, _Geomys lutescens_ of
+western Kansas from _Geomys bursarius_ of eastern Kansas, prove not to
+do so; instead, in areas geographically intermediate between the
+geographic ranges of the two kinds, the pocket gophers are intermediate
+in morphological characters and therefore are regarded as intergrades.
+Intergradation of this kind here is accepted as the criterion of
+subspecies, and lack of such intergradation as the criterion of species.
+Search for structural characters, distinctive of the different kinds,
+additional to those characters noted by other writers, has resulted in
+the finding of a few such characters but they too are subject to
+intergradation. Therefore the several kinds are arranged as subspecies
+of a single species which takes the name _Geomys bursarius_ because it
+is the oldest available name. Detailed comment on specimens showing
+intergradation are to be found in the accounts of _G. b. bursarius_ and
+_G. b. major_.
+
+
+
+
+METHODS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
+
+
+The series with the largest number of individuals from one restricted
+locality was selected for initial study. These individuals were
+segregated by sex, and specimens of each sex were arranged from oldest
+to youngest. Each series was divided into age-groups, and within a given
+age-group of one sex from one locality of what was considered as one
+species, estimation was made of the amount of individual variation.
+Thus, it was possible when comparing different kinds of pocket gophers
+to use only one age class of one season of one sex.
+
+Age was estimated to some extent by size of animal and nature of its
+pelage. The immature pelage is grayer and the hair is more crinkled than
+in adults. A more certain guide to age, however, is furnished by the
+skull. With increasing age some sutures disappear, the rostrum increases
+in length and the ridges marking the limits of the temporal muscles come
+to fuse and eventually, in males, form a high sagittal crest.
+
+ Cranial measurements were taken as follows:
+
+ Basilar length.--From the anteriormost inferior border of the
+ foramen magnum to a line connecting the posteriormost margins
+ of the alveoli of the first upper incisors.
+
+ Length of the nasals.--The greatest length of the nasals.
+
+ Zygomatic breadth.--The greatest distance across the zygomatic
+ arches.
+
+ Mastoid breadth.--The greatest distance across the mastoids.
+
+ Breadth of rostrum.--Width, perpendicular to long axis of the
+ skull.
+
+ Interorbital constriction.--The least distance between the
+ orbits.
+
+ Maxillary tooth row.--The greatest length of the upper
+ molariform tooth row at the alveolar border.
+
+ Extension of premaxillae posterior to nasals.--From the
+ posteriormost border of the nasals to the posterior end of the
+ extension of a premaxilla.
+
+ Depth of skull.--From the median suture of the frontals, on the
+ dorsal surface of the skull to the median suture of the
+ palatines at the level of the first molar (not premolar).
+
+ Length of rostrum.--From the anterior border of the nasal to
+ the maxilla at the lateral end of the hamulus of the lacrimal.
+
+ In the list of specimens examined, localities are arranged by
+ counties from west to east, beginning at the northwestern
+ corner of the state; specimens in each county are arranged from
+ north to south. If several localities are in the same latitude,
+ the westernmost is listed first. Capitalized color terms are
+ after Ridgway, Color Standards and Color Nomenclature,
+ Washington, D. C., 1912.
+
+ [Illustration: FIG. 1. Map showing the geographic distribution of the
+ five subspecies of the Mississippi Valley pocket gopher, _Geomys
+ bursarius_, in Kansas, with insert showing range of the species.]
+
+ In connection with this study each of the authors acknowledges
+ assistance from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
+ and one of us (Villa) is grateful for assistance also to Drs.
+ Isaac Ochoterena and Roberto Llamas of the Biological Institute
+ of Mexico. For the loan of specimens we are grateful to Dr.
+ William B. Davis, of the Agricultural and Mechanical College of
+ Texas; Dr. G. C. Rinker, of Hamilton, Kansas; and Mr. A. J.
+ Kirn, of Somerset, Texas. Unless otherwise indicated, specimens
+ are in the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History.
+
+
+
+
+ ACCOUNTS OF SUBSPECIES
+
+ =Geomys bursarius lutescens=, Merriam
+
+
+ _Geomys bursarius lutescens_ Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 4:51,
+ October 8, 1890; Scheffer, Technical Bull., U. S. Dept. Agric.,
+ 224:6, January, 1931.
+
+ _Geomys lutescens_ Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 8:127-29,
+ January 31, 1895; Lantz, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 19:175,
+ 1905; Lantz, Kansas State Agric. College Bull., 129:335, April,
+ 1905; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 36:240, 1933; Black,
+ 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board Agric., 35:182, 1937;
+ Swenk, Missouri Valley Fauna, 2:1, February 1, 1940; Allen,
+ Kansas State Teachers College, Emporia, Bull. Inf. in Educ., 20
+ (no. 5):15, May, 1940; Hooper, Occas. Papers Mus. Zooel., Univ.
+ Michigan, 420:3, June 28, 1940.
+
+ _Geomys lutescens lutescens_, Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad.
+ Sci., 47:74, 1944.
+
+ _Type locality._--Sandhills on Birdwood Creek, Lincoln County,
+ western Nebraska.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Northwestern Kansas, eastward
+ certainly to Ellis County, southward certainly to Scott County.
+
+ _Description._--Animals with total length averaging no more
+ than 272 mm.; length of vertebrae of tail averaging no more
+ than 92; hind foot averaging no more than 35. Color: In autumn
+ pelage, upper parts Light Ochraceous-Buff becoming Buckthorn
+ Brown in middorsal region and there forming a faint
+ longitudinal band; sides Pale Yellow Orange. In summer,
+ Buckthorn Brown on upper parts with a dorsal band, especially
+ distinct on specimens from Ellis and Trego counties; specimens
+ from farther west lack the distinct dorsal band. Underparts
+ Gray Drab and sometimes whitish, usually whitish in young
+ specimens; basal color of pelage Deep Neutral Gray; fore and
+ hind feet whitish. Skull: Zygomatic arch broadly and squarely
+ spreading anteriorly; temporal impressions uniting to form a
+ low sagittal crest in adult males, but in adult females and in
+ young males the impressions usually remain apart; shape of
+ interparietal varying from subquadrate in young specimens to
+ subtriangular or triangular in adults; in some young specimens
+ the interparietal is reduced to a minute, ovoid bone.
+
+_Comparisons._--See comparisons in the accounts of other subspecies
+occurring in Kansas.
+
+_Remarks._--In his monographic revision of the pocket gophers, Merriam
+(1895:129) recorded 3 "typical or nearly typical" specimens from Trego
+County, and 18 "non typical" specimens as follows: Garden Plain,
+Sedgwick County, 4; Belle Plain, Sumner County, 5; Cairo, Pratt County,
+6; Kiowa, Barber County, 2; and Ellis, Ellis County, 1. A detailed
+discussion of Merriam's account of the distribution of _Geomys
+lutescens_ in Kansas is given by Swenk (1940:11-12).
+
+Judging by specimens in the University of Kansas Museum of Natural
+History, _G. bursarius lutescens_ in Kansas is restricted to the
+northwestern part of the state, reaching southward certainly to Scott
+County and eastward certainly to Ellis County; precise limits of
+distribution of this subspecies are unknown. Additional collecting is
+necessary to determine where the range of _lutescens_ meets the ranges
+of the other subspecies. The specimens studied are remarkably uniform.
+One specimen obtained in October, in Trego County, is slightly lighter
+colored than any other from Kansas. In other characteristics it agrees
+with specimens from northwestern Kansas and from the type locality.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number 32, as follows: _Cheyenne
+ County_: 23 mi. (by road) NW St. Francis, 3. _Rawlins County_:
+ 2 mi. NE Ludell, 10. _Logan County_: 5 mi. W Elkader, 3; no
+ locality more precise than county, 1. _Trego County_: Wakeeney,
+ 4; 12 mi. S Collyer, Perrington Ranch, 3; no locality more
+ precise than county, 5. _Scott County_: 4 mi. S Scott City, 2.
+ _Ellis County_: Hays State College Campus, Hays, 1.
+
+
+ =Geomys bursarius majusculus= Swenk
+
+ _Geomys bursarius majusculus_ Swenk, Missouri Valley Fauna,
+ 1:6, December 5, 1939; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+ 47:74, 1944.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius_, Baird, Expls. and surveys for a railroad
+ route from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, pt. 1,
+ Mammals, 377, 1857; Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 8:120, January,
+ 1895; Lantz, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 19:175, 1905; Lantz,
+ Kansas State Agric. College Bull., 129:335, April, 1905;
+ Scheffer, Kansas State Agric. College Ento. and Zooel. Dept.
+ Bull., 172:199, September, 1910; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad.
+ Sci., 36:240, 1933; Allen, Kansas State Teachers College
+ Emporia Bull. Inf. Stud. in Educ., 20 (no. 5):15, May, 1940.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius bursarius_, Black, 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas
+ State Board Agric., 35:181, 1937.
+
+ _Geomys breviceps_, Baird, Expls. and surveys for a railroad
+ route from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, pt. 1,
+ Mammals, 380, 1857.
+
+ _Type locality._--Lincoln, Lancaster County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Northeastern Kansas, westward
+ certainly to Clay and Marion counties and southward certainly
+ to Greenwood County.
+
+ _Description._--Color: Upper parts Mummy Brown in fresh
+ appearing pelage of February but in more worn pelage of March
+ more reddish being near (16') Prout's Brown; top of head and
+ sometimes back darker than rest of upper parts; underparts
+ usually with some whitish anteriorly; fore and hind feet and
+ approximately distal half of tail white. Size: Large, total
+ length averaging more than 280 mm. in males and 257 in females;
+ hind foot averaging 35 mm. or more in males. Skull: Large;
+ rostrum averaging more than twice as long as wide; sagittal
+ crest high in males and barely present in females; occiput
+ vertical when skull is laid top down; least width of braincase
+ less than
+ distance from alveolus of upper incisor to middle of lateral
+ border of P^4 at alveolar border.
+
+_Comparisons._--From _Geomys bursarius lutescens_, _majusculus_ differs
+as follows: Color darker, Mummy Brown to Prout's Brown instead of
+Buckthorn Brown. In both sexes: head and body a fifth to a sixth longer;
+hind foot 5 to 6 per cent longer; skull averaging larger in all parts
+measured except that premaxillae (in each subspecies) extend equally far
+posteriorly to nasals; diastema longer in relation to basilar length;
+rostrum longer relative to its width; sagittal crest higher; rostrum
+often more depressed distally; angle of suture between maxilla and jugal
+more obtuse.
+
+From _G. b. bursarius_, according to Swenk (1939:6), _majusculus_
+differs in larger size.
+
+From _G. b. illinoensis_, _majusculus_, according to Komarek and Spencer
+(1931:405), differs in brownish instead of slate-gray coloration and in
+two cranial characters as follows: Nasals straight-sided instead of
+shaped like an hour-glass, and superficial canals on palatine extending
+anteriorly beyond first molar, and from there anteriorly more or less
+separated. The first of these characters does not always hold;
+occasional individuals of _majusculus_, for example some from Douglas
+County, have the nasals shaped like an hour-glass.
+
+From _G. breviceps dutcheri_, _majusculus_ differs in larger size (hind
+foot more than 33 mm. in males, and 29 in females; basilar length more
+than 42 mm. in males and 36 in females); dorsal exposure of jugal longer
+than width of rostrum measured between ventral margins of infraorbital
+foramina.
+
+From _G. bursarius major_ of southcentral Kansas (for example Harvey
+County), _majusculus_ differs in slightly darker color, being Mummy
+Brown instead of Prout's Brown; size larger (in males total length more
+than 284 mm., hind foot 35 or more, basilar length of skull more than
+42, and in females total length 265 or more, hind foot averaging 33 or
+more, and basilar length 40 or more).
+
+Skull: Averaging larger in all parts measured, except that premaxillae
+do not extend so far posteriorly to nasals in either males or females;
+interorbital constriction slightly narrower in adult females; temporal
+ridges forming a more prominent sagittal crest in adult males (sagittal
+crest barely present in some adult males of _major_ from Harper County).
+
+_Remarks._--In employing the subspecific name _majusculus_ we are
+following Swenk (1939:6) who on the basis of larger size differentiated
+the animals from southeastern South Dakota, the eastern parts of
+Nebraska and Kansas, and the western and southern parts of Iowa, from
+_G. bursarius bursarius_ to which he assigned a more northern geographic
+range. In the absence of comparative materials of the northern
+subspecies we cannot make an independent decision on the validity of
+_majusculus_ and recognize that if it is inseparable from _G. b.
+bursarius_ the latter name will apply to specimens from northeastern
+Kansas. We are the more uncertain about applying the name _majusculus_
+to specimens from eastern Kansas because they average smaller than
+topotypes. Only at the northeasternmost locality in Kansas (3 mi. N
+Cummings, Atchison County) do specimens average as large as topotypes of
+_majusculus_. Farther southward they become progressively smaller in
+eastern Kansas, and we interpret this as intergradation with the still
+smaller subspecies _major_, to the southwest. The average external
+measurements of two adult males from Atchison County are: 321-99-35.
+Thirty-six miles farther south, in Douglas County, 16 adult males
+average 289-80-36. From Hamilton, Greenwood County, 80 miles farther
+southwest, nine adult males average 284-83-35. The maximum total length
+recorded at these three localities is: Atchison County, 342 (1 of 2
+specimens), Douglas County, 308 (1 of 16 specimens), Greenwood County,
+357 (in coll. of Dr. Glenn C. Rinker and 1 of 15 males of all ages
+involved). It will be seen, therefore, that although there is a trend to
+smaller average size toward the southward, the maximum of 357
+millimeters total length at Hamilton exceeds the maximum of 352
+millimeters recorded by Swenk (1939:3) among 86 males at Lincoln where
+the recorded average is largest.
+
+Four specimens from Salina (Debold Farm) are intermediate structurally,
+as they are also geographically, between _G. b. majusculus_ on the one
+hand and _Geomys bursarius lutescens_ and _Geomys bursarius major_ on
+the other hand. In color they agree with _majusculus_, as they do also
+in width of nasals posteriorly, in more obtuse angle of the rostrum and
+maxillary arm of the zygomatic arch. They agree with _G. b. lutescens_
+in having the occiput inclined anterodorsally, and are intermediate
+between _majusculus_ and _lutescens_, but nearer the latter in size of
+skull and in length of the rostrum relative to its width.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number, 148, as follows: _Clay
+ County_: 6 mi. SW Clay Center, 3. _Jackson County_: 10-1/2 mi.
+ WSW Holton, 1; no locality more precise than county, 1.
+ _Atchison County_: 3 mi. N Cummings, 2. _Jefferson County_:
+ Oskaloosa, 1. _Leavenworth County_: Fort Leavenworth
+ (Government Hill, 2; Engineer Hill, 1), 6; no locality more
+ precise
+ than county, 19. _Saline County_: Salina, Debold Farm, 4 (coll.
+ of A. J. Kirn). _Morris County_: 1-1/2 mi. N Council Grove, 3.
+ _Douglas County_: 1 mi. NW Midland, 2; 1 mi. N Lawrence, 1;
+ 2-1/2 mi. W Lawrence, 2; 1 mi. W K. U. Campus, 2; 1 mi. W
+ Lawrence, 2; 1/2 mi. W Lawrence, 2; "W K. U. Campus," 2; K. U.
+ Campus, 4; Lawrence, 23; South Lawrence, 1; 1/2 mi. SW K. U.
+ Campus, 2; Southwest K. U. Campus, 1; Haskell Institute, 1;
+ 4-1/2 mi. S Lawrence, 1; 7 mi. SW Lawrence, 6; 7-1/2 mi. SW
+ Lawrence, 1; 8 mi. SW Lawrence, 1; 10 mi. S Lawrence, 1; 11 mi.
+ SW Lawrence, 3; no locality more precise than county, 15.
+ _Marion County_: 1-1/2 mi. NE Lincolnville, 6; 4 mi. SE
+ Lincolnville, 1; 6 mi. S Lincolnville, 1. _Greenwood County_:
+ Hamilton, 1; 1/2 mi. S Hamilton, 4; 1 mi. S Hamilton, 4; 4 mi.
+ S and 14 mi. W Hamilton, 6; 8 mi. SW Toronto, 1; 8-1/2 mi. SW
+ Toronto, 5; no locality more precise than county, 6.
+
+
+ =Geomys bursarius jugossicularis= Hooper
+
+ _Geomys lutescens jugossicularis_ Hooper, Occas. Papers Mus.
+ Zooel., Univ. Michigan, no. 420: 1, June 28, 1940; Hibbard,
+ Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., vol. 47, p. 75, 1944.
+
+ _Type locality._--Lamar, Prowers County, Colorado.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Extreme southwestern part of state,
+ northward certainly to Hamilton County and south certainly to
+ Morton and Seward counties.
+
+ _Description._--A yellowish-cinnamon colored animal, with body
+ of medium size, zygomatic plate of maxilla deep and mastoid
+ process small.
+
+_Comparisons._--Differs from _Geomys bursarius industrius_ in slightly
+lighter color; occiput not strongly inclined anterodorsally.
+
+From _G. b. lutescens_, _jugossicularis_ differs in less buffy
+coloration and deeper zygomatic plate of maxilla.
+
+_Remarks._--_G. bursarius jugossicularis_ and _G. bursarius industrius_
+intergrade in the southern part of Meade County. Some specimens from
+this area show a coloration resembling that of _G. b. jugossicularis_;
+nevertheless, one specimen from Morton County has the occiput
+anterodorsally inclined as in _G. b. industrius_.
+
+ Specimens examined from Hamilton County correspond closely to _G. b.
+ jugossicularis_; they agree with it both in color and in cranial
+ characters.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number, 20, distributed as
+ follows: _Hamilton County_: 1 mi. E Coolidge, Conard Farm, 4.
+ _Morton County_: 12 mi. NE Elkhart, 2; Cimarron River, 12 mi. N
+ Elkhart, 4; no locality more precise than county, 6. _Seward
+ County_: 1 mi. E Arkalon, 4.
+
+
+ =Geomys bursarius industrius=, new subspecies
+
+ _Geomys lutescens_ Merriam, North Amer. Fauna, 8:127, January
+ 31, 1895.
+
+ _Geomys breviceps llanensis_, Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad.
+ Sci., 36:240, 1933; Black, 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board
+ Agric., 35:181. 1937.
+
+ _Geomys lutescens jugossicularis_ Hooper, Occas. Papers Mus.
+ Zooel., Univ. Michigan, 420:1, June 28, 1940.
+
+ _Type._--Male, adult, skin and skull, no. 14083 Museum of
+ Natural History, University of Kansas; from 1-1/2 miles north
+ of Fowler, Meade County, Kansas; obtained December 30, 1941, by
+ H. H. Hildebrand, original number 16.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Southwestern Kansas from Meade
+ County eastward certainly to Pratt and Clark counties; from
+ Pawnee County southward probably to the Oklahoma boundary.
+
+ _Diagnosis._--Size of body medium; color of upper parts Cinnamon
+ Brown; skull with occiput strongly inclined anterodorsally in
+ males.
+
+ [Illustration: FIG. 2. Three views of the skull of the type
+ specimen of _Geomys bursarius industrius_. A. Lateral view; B.
+ Dorsal view; C. Ventral view. All natural size.]
+
+ _Description._--Color: Upper parts Cinnamon Brown, slightly
+ reddish, but in some specimens collected in September, in
+ Pawnee County, near (15' _i_) Ochraceous-Tawny; underparts
+ usually Wood Brown, somewhat whitish anteriorly; forefeet
+ white; hind feet and approximately distal half of tail whitish.
+ Size: Medium (see measurements), total length averaging not
+ more than 271 mm. in males and 254 in females; hind foot
+ averaging not more than 35 mm. in males and less than 32 in
+ females. Skull: In males, least width of braincase equal to
+ distance from alveolus of incisor to anterior border of
+ alveolus of first upper molar, occiput strongly inclined
+ anterodorsally, temporal impressions usually united in a low
+ sagittal crest, zygomatic arch heavy and curved at level of
+ jugal bone. In adult females least width of braincase
+ approximately equal to distance from alveolus of incisor to
+ anterior border of alveolus of first upper molar (not
+ premolar); occiput less inclined anterodorsally
+ than in males; temporal ridges not forming a sagittal crest. In
+ young females the width of the braincase is more than the
+ distance between the alveoli of the incisor and first molar.
+
+_Comparisons._--_G. lutescens industrius_ differs from _G. lutescens
+lutescens_ in: Color darker; least width of braincase not equal to
+(usually more than) the distance from the alveolus of incisor to the
+anterior border of the alveolus of the first upper molar.
+
+_G. lutescens industrius_ differs from _G. lutescens jugossicularis_ in:
+Color slightly darker, the former being Cinnamon Brown instead of
+Vinaceous Cinnamon, with hairs basally Deep Neutral Gray in upper parts
+and underparts. Skull: Jugular part of zygomatic arch more curved
+(convex dorsally) and occiput far more inclined anterodorsally; lower
+part of mastoidal ridge more prominent.
+
+For comparison with _G. l. major_, see account of that subspecies.
+
+_Remarks._--Judging from the known specimens of this subspecies, it has
+the smallest geographic range of any of the subspecies in Kansas, but
+additional collecting in Hodgeman County and counties to the north and
+west of it may extend the known range in those directions; collecting in
+Comanche County and in adjoining parts of Oklahoma may extend the known
+range to the southward.
+
+The anterodorsal inclination of the occiput in males is the one cranial
+character in which _industrius_ differs from all of the subspecies with
+adjoining geographic ranges. The existence of this unique (among
+adjoining subspecies) cranial character is the principal reason for
+according subspecific status to this animal. Although it has other
+characters which are fairly uniform over a considerable geographic area,
+these other characters, namely, Cinnamon Brown color of the upper parts
+and medium size of the body, after all, are conditions intermediate
+between those in _jugossicularis_ to the west and those in the darker
+and larger animals assigned to _major_ to the eastward. Considering the
+intermediate geographic position of _industrius_, the color and size are
+approximately what a person would predict by study of only the animals
+to the west and those to the east. Therefore, the color and size
+probably are indicative of intergradation between _jugossicularis_ and
+_major_. Still, there is the anterodorsally inclined occiput in
+males--a character of a unique sort--and this influences us to give
+subspecific status to this animal with full recognition of the fact that
+it is a "weak" subspecies as compared with any one of the adjoining
+subspecies.
+
+Hooper (1940:2) in naming as new _Geomys lutescens jugossicularis_
+referred to his new subspecies a skin-only from Meade County State Park.
+Our more abundant material from there shows the cranial conformation to
+be that of _industrius_ to which we accordingly assign the specimens.
+However, with only a skin available, we, too, would have used the name
+_jugossicularis_ because the color is paler than in other specimens of
+_industrius_ and this paleness indicates intergradation between the two
+named subspecies. Specimens from Pratt County are slightly darker than
+_industrius_ thereby indicating intergradation between _industrius_ and
+_major_.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number, 58, distributed as
+ follows: _Pawnee County_: Jct. Pawnee and Arkansas rivers,
+ Larned, 6; 1 mi. S and 1 mi. E Larned, 7. _Edwards County_: 1
+ mi. W and 3-1/2 mi. S Kinsley, 1. _Kiowa County_: Rezeau Ranch,
+ 5 mi. N Belvidere, 2. _Pratt County_: Pratt, 14; no locality
+ more precise than county, 1. _Meade County_: 3-1/2 mi. NE
+ Fowler, 2; 2 mi. N Fowler, 2; 1-1/2 mi. N Fowler, 2; 1-1/4 mi.
+ N and 3/4 mi. E Fowler, 2; 7 mi. N Meade, Cudahy Ash Pit, 2; 13
+ mi. SW Meade, 9; State Lake, 2; State Park, 4. _Clark County_:
+ 7 mi. SW Kingsdown, E. A. Stephenson Ranch, 1; 6 mi. S
+ Kingsdown, 1.
+
+
+ =Geomys bursarius major= Davis
+
+ _Geomys lutescens major_ Davis, Texas Agric. Exp. St., Bull.
+ no. 590:32, August, 1940; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+ 47:75, 1944.
+
+ _Geomys lutescens_ Merriam, N. Amer. Fauna, 8:129, January 31,
+ 1895.
+
+ _Geomys breviceps llanensis_, Lantz, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 20
+ (pt. 2): 215, 1907; Hibbard, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 36:240,
+ 1933; Black, 30th Bienn. Rept. Kansas State Board Agric.,
+ 35:182, 1937; Swenk, Missouri Valley Fauna, 2:12, February 1,
+ 1940.
+
+ _Type locality._--Eight miles west of Clarendon, Donley County,
+ Texas.
+
+ _Distribution in Kansas._--Southcentral Kansas, northward
+ certainly to Ellsworth County, westward certainly to Stafford
+ and Barber counties and eastward to Cowley County.
+
+ _Description._--Color: Upper parts varying from Brussels Brown
+ in some specimens to nearly Prout's Brown, especially in
+ specimens from central part of state. Top of head, and
+ sometimes back, darker than rest of upper parts, but no well
+ defined black stripe; underparts varying from whitish to nearly
+ Buffy Brown; fore and hind feet and approximately distal half
+ of tail white. Size: Large (see measurements). Skull: Sagittal
+ crest absent in females and barely present in males; least
+ width of braincase more than distance from alveolus of incisor
+ to middle of lateral border of P^4 at alveolar border. Length
+ of auditory bulla (from anteroventral edge of paroccipital
+ process of exoccipital to hamulus of peterygoid), in each sex,
+ more than 8 mm.; occiput usually vertical when skull is laid
+ top down; zygomatic arch broadly and squarely spreading,
+ divergent anteriorly; rostrum averaging less than twice as long
+ as wide.
+
+_Comparisons._--From _G. bursarius lutescens_, _major_ differs in color
+darker, premaxillae extending slightly farther posteriorly; temporal
+impressions usually forming a more well-marked sagittal crest in males;
+ventral side of zygomatic arch, at level of jugal bone, more curved.
+
+From _G. bursarius majusculus_, _major_ differs in slightly lighter
+color, smaller size of body; in males, total length less than 284 mm.;
+hind foot 34 or less; basilar length of skull less than 42; in females
+total length less than 264, hind foot no more than 33, and basilar
+length less than 39.
+
+From _G. bursarius industrius_, _major_ differs in color, being Prout's
+Brown, instead of Cinnamon Brown (less Fuscous); body averaging 10 per
+cent longer; total length in males from 9 to 9.7 per cent longer, hind
+foot 9.7 per cent longer on the average; skull averaging larger in all
+parts measured. Occiput less inclined anterodorsally; top nearly flat,
+less arched than that of _G. b. industrius_; auditory bulla averaging
+slightly larger and less inflated.
+
+_Remarks._--Specimens of this subspecies from Norman, Cleveland County,
+Oklahoma, and Canton, Dewey County, Oklahoma, and most of those from
+Kansas, are more Fuscous than topotypes and tend toward _G. bursarius
+majusculus_. Specimens from McPherson County have a darker dorsal stripe
+resembling that of _G. bursarius majusculus_. One adult from Little Salt
+Marsh, Stafford County, is pale, closely resembling topotypes.
+
+Most of the cranial characters, nevertheless, are constant in all
+available specimens, except that in specimens of each sex from the type
+locality the basilar length averages 4 to 5 per cent shorter. In the
+constancy of size of the relatively large auditory bullae and in the
+nearly flat dorsal profile of the cranial part of the skull, the
+specimens from Kansas agree with the specimens from the type locality.
+
+Specimens from Harper County have the occiput slightly inclined
+anterodorsally and thus are reminiscent of _industrius_ which has an
+even greater inclination of the occiput. Probably the appearance in
+dilute fashion of this character in Harper County is properly to be
+interpreted as intergradation with _industrius_. If so, the actual
+intergradation may be to the northwest _via_ Pratt County since
+specimens from Barber County, immediately west of Harper and lying
+between Harper County and the range of _industrius_, do not have the
+occiput so inclined.
+
+Of a pair of adults from eight miles west of Rosalia, Butler County,
+the female is indistinguishable in color from adults of _G. b.
+industrius_ from northern Meade County and from two specimens from
+eleven miles west of Clarendon, Donley County, Texas, near the type
+locality of _G. b. major_. The male from eight miles west of Rosalia is
+darker as compared either with _G. b. industrius_ or _G. b. major_ and
+the coloration of the upper parts resembles those in _G. b._
+_majusculus_; the underparts are only slightly paler than the upper
+parts as in _majusculus_. Measurements of the skulls are intermediate
+between the averages for _G. b. majusculus_ and those for _G. b. major_.
+These specimens from eight miles west of Rosalia are intermediate
+structurally, and since they are intermediate geographically between _G.
+b. majusculus_ and _G. b. major_, they suggest intergradation of the two
+subspecies. The specimens in question are referred to _major_ because
+the size is nearer that of _major_. It is mainly the intermediate nature
+of these two specimens from Butler County, and the intermediate nature
+of the specimens from McPherson County, Kansas, that have caused us to
+treat _G. b. majusculus_ as only subspecifically distinct from the more
+western subspecies, _major_.
+
+ _Specimens examined._--Total number, 77, as follows: _Ellsworth
+ County_: 2 mi. S Ellsworth, 1. _McPherson County_: Smoky Hill
+ River, 1 mi. S and 1/2 mi. W Lindsborg, 5; 1/2 mi. E McPherson,
+ 1. _Stafford County_: Little Salt Marsh, 12; no locality more
+ precise than county, 3. _Reno County_: 8 mi. N and 1 mi. E
+ Haven, 2. _Harvey County_: 1 mi. E and 1/2 mi. N Halstead, 1;
+ Halstead, 3. _Butler County_: 8 mi. W Rosalia, 2. _Barber
+ County_: near South Bridge, Sun City, 1; 2 mi. S Sun City, 1;
+ Wells Ranch, Aetna, 5; "1 mi. W Aetna," 3; near South Bridge,
+ Aetna, 1; near Bridge, 1 mi. S Aetna, 2. _Harper County_: 4-1/2
+ mi. NE Danville, 8; 1 mi. N Harper, 11; 3 mi. S Harper, 1.
+ _Cowley County_: 3 mi. SW Arkansas City, 4; 3 mi. SE Arkansas
+ City, 9; 3 mi. S Arkansas City, 1.
+
+
+
+
+ MEASUREMENTS OF ADULT MALES OF GEOMYS
+
+
+ (In millimeters)
+
+ Key for table headings in table on this page.
+
+ N: Number of individuals averaged or catalogue number
+ L: Total length
+ T: Length of tail
+ H: Length of hind foot
+ B: Basilar length
+ Na: Length of nasals
+ Z: Zygomatic breadth
+ M: Mastoid breadth
+ Rb: Breadth of rostrum
+ I: Interorbital constriction
+ A: Alveolar length of maxillary tooth row
+ E: Extension of premaxilla posterior to nasals
+ S: Depth of skull
+ Rl: Length of rostrum
+
+ ======+===+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+===+===+===+====+=====
+ N |L | T | H | B | Na | Z | M | Rb | I | A | E | S | Rl
+ ------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---+---+---+----+-----
+ _G. b. lutescens_; topotypes
+ 5 ave.|266|82.0|34.2|40.0|17.7|30.5|26.8|11.5|6.7|8.6|3.9|17.1|20.8
+ min.|257|76.0|33.0|38.3|16.0|29.1|26.1|11.2|6.3|8.1|3.5|16.2|19.1
+ max.|276|91.0|36.0|42.4|20.3|31.7|27.5|11.9|6.9|9.2|4.2|17.7|23.6
+
+ 2 mi. NE Ludell, Rawlins Co., Kansas
+ 12088|272|92.0|35.0|43.2|19.1|32.3|27.7|11.3|6.6|8.4|2.8|18.0|22.1
+
+ _G. b. majusculus_; Douglas Co., Kansas
+ | | | | | |[A] | | | | | | |
+ 16 ave. |289|79.8|36.3|47.1|21.0|34.1|30.4|12.1|6.8|9.3|3.7|18.5|24.9
+ min. |273|70.0|32.0|44.7|18.9|30.5|27.5|11.1|6.5|8.2|2.9|17.3|22.9
+ max. |308|95.0|55.0|49.9|23.2|38.0|34.5|13.5|7.6|10.3|5.7|20.0|28.1
+
+ _G. b. jugossicularis_; Morton Co., Kansas
+ 4 ave.|265|82.0|34.2|40.7|16.9|30.0|27.9|10.7|6.0|8.6|5.2|17.3|21.2
+ min.|250|68.0|30.0|38.5|16.1|29.0|27.5|10.5|5.5|8.2|4.7|16.4|20.2
+ max.|285|92.0|37.0|42.4|17.4|31.1|28.4|11.0|6.2|9.2|5.5|17.9|22.0
+
+ _G. b. industrius_; Meade Co., Kansas
+ 8 ave.|265|82.0|35.0|40.9|18.1|30.0|28.0|11.0|6.2|8.8|4.3|17.7|21.8
+ min.|247|70.0|33.0|37.9|15.5|28.2|26.5| 9.9|5.7|8.0|2.9|16.8|19.5
+ max.|280|90.0|36.0|43.4|21.0|32.4|29.5|11.6|7.0|9.1|5.2|19.1|24.2
+
+ _G. b. major_; Wells Ranch, Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 11724|256|66.0|34.0|41.0|18.3|31.6|28.2|10.6|6.1|9.0|4.0|17.0|21.3
+
+ 1 mi. W Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 11153|240|75.0|32.0|36.7|15.7|26.9|24.6| 9.9|5.9|8.8|4.0|15.0|19.5
+ 11152|240|65.0|32.0|36.0|14.2|26.1|25.4|10.9|5.6|8.5|5.0|15.5|18.5
+
+ 3 mi. SE Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas
+ | | | | |[E] | | | | | | | |
+ 12870|246|76.0|32.0|42.1|16.0|33.7|29.7|11.5|6.3|9.4|4.5|17.6|21.3
+
+ 3 mi. SW Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas
+ 12892|282|84.0|33.0|41.7|17.3|....|27.7|10.8|6.4|8.9|4.2|17.2|21.5
+ ------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---+---+---+----+-----
+
+
+
+
+ MEASUREMENTS OF ADULT FEMALES OF GEOMYS
+
+
+ (In millimeters)
+
+ Key for table headings in table on this page.
+
+ N: Number of individuals averaged or catalogue number
+ L: Total length
+ T: Length of tail
+ H: Length of hind foot
+ B: Basilar length
+ Na: Length of nasals
+ Z: Zygomatic breadth
+ M: Mastoid breadth
+ Rb: Breadth of rostrum
+ I: Interorbital constriction
+ A: Alveolar length of maxillary tooth row
+ E: Extension of premaxilla posterior to nasals
+ S: Depth of skull
+ Rl: Length of rostrum
+
+ ======+===+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+===+===+===+====+=====
+ N | L | T | H | B | Na | Z | M | Rb | I | A | E | S | Rl
+ ------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---+---+---+----+-----
+ _G. b. lutescens_; topotypes
+ 6 ave.|233|72.3|31.1|35.3|15.0|25.9|23.7|10.4|6.1|8.3|3.7|15.4|18.4
+ min.|215|63.0|30.0|33.5|13.9|24.6|21.8|10.1|5.6|8.1|2.9|14.8|17.3
+ max.|254|76.0|32.0|37.0|16.8|26.7|24.8|10.7|6.6|8.5|4.5|16.2|19.8
+
+ 2 mi. NE Ludell, Rawlins Co., Kansas
+ 11733|230|63.0|31.0|35.3|15.1|26.5|24.1| 9.3|6.1|7.5|2.4|15.0|18.2
+ 12155|245|70.0|30.0|35.6|14.6|25.2|24.1|10.6|6.4|7.5|3.1|14.9|18.2
+
+ _G. b. majusculus_; Douglas Co., Kansas
+ | | | |[B] |[B] |[A] | | | | | | |
+ 17 ave. |265|78.6|32.8|40.6|17.2|28.6|26.4|10.9|6.5|9.1|3.6|16.6|21.0
+ min. |222|59.0|30.0|37.1|15.9|26.7|24.9|10.0|5.9|8.5|2.0|15.2|18.8
+ max. |304|92.0|35.0|47.0|20.1|33.4|29.1|12.3|7.3|10.0|5.9|19.1|24.1
+
+ _G. b. jugossicularis_; Morton Co., Kansas
+ 5012|244|72.0|30.0|36.2|16.4|25.4|25.0|10.0|5.9|8.0|4.2|16.0|19.3
+ 5395|230|72.0|30.0|34.6|13.9|24.7|24.8| 9.8|5.8|8.0|4.5|15.2|17.5
+
+ _G. b. industrius_; Meade Co., Kansas
+ | |[C] | |[D] | | |[D] |
+ 7 ave. |238|73.0|31.3|36.4|14.9|26.3|24.8|10.0|6.0|8.4|4.1|16.2|18.6
+ min. |231|65.0|30.0|35.4|14.0|25.8|24.5| 9.5|5.6|8.1|3.6|15.5|17.5
+ max. |256|75.0|32.0|37.8|16.1|27.8|25.9|10.3|6.5|8.7|4.7|17.6|19.9
+
+ _G. b. major_; 1 mi. S Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 10069|257|95.0|32.0|37.0|16.4|26.4|25.5|10.8|6.2|9.0|3.4|16.4|19.4
+
+ Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 10070|242|83.0|30.0|36.8|15.7|26.2|25.0|10.1|6.5|9.1|3.3|15.8|19.1
+
+ Wells Ranch, Aetna, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 12238|239|65.0|31.0|34.2|14.5|24.6|23.7| 9.6|6.0|8.0|3.6|15.2|17.7
+
+ 1 mi. S.Sun City, Barber Co., Kansas
+ 11075|232|66.0|28.0|34.2|14.4|25.0|23.6| 9.9|5.9|8.0|3.4|15.0|17.0
+
+ 3 mi. SW Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas
+ 12872|242|66.0|30.0|38.1|15.0|28.0|26.2|10.3|6.3|7.8|4.5|16.1|19.1
+
+ 3 mi. SE Arkansas City, Cowley Co., Kansas
+ 12894|230|82.0|30.0|38.5|15.5|28.0|25.6|10.0|6.7|8.7|4.0|16.6|19.5
+ 12893|246|83.0|32.0|36.5|14.2|25.6|24.8| 9.6|6.6|8.7|4.6|15.4|18.1
+ ------+---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---+---+---+----+-----
+
+[A] 15 averaged.
+
+[B] 16 averaged.
+
+[C] 6 averaged.
+
+[D] 5 averaged.
+
+[E] approximate.
+
+
+
+
+SUBSPECIES OF THE SPECIES GEOMYS BURSARIUS
+
+
+If _Geomys lutescens major_ Davis is correctly judged to intergrade with
+_Geomys bursarius majusculus_ Swenk, the name for the full species will
+be _Geomys bursarius_ because _bursarius_ is the oldest name among those
+available. Some new combinations of names are required. According to our
+present understanding, the eleven kinds of pocket gophers named below
+are properly to be arranged as subspecies of the species _Geomys
+bursarius_:
+
+ _Geomys bursarius bursarius_ (Shaw). Type from unknown locality
+ in Upper Mississippi Valley.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius majusculus_ Swenk. Type from Lincoln,
+ Lancaster County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius hylaeus_ Blossom. Type from 10 mi. S Chadron,
+ Dawes County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius levisagittalis_ Swenk. Type from Spencer,
+ Boyd County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius vinaceus_ Swenk. Type from Scottsbluff,
+ Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius lutescens_ Merriam. Type from Sandhills on
+ Birdwood Creek, Lincoln County, Nebraska.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius illinoensis_ Komarek and Spencer. Type from 1
+ mi. S Momence, Kankakee County, Illinois.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius jugossicularis_ Hooper. Type from Lamar,
+ Prowers County, Colorado.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius industrius_ new subspecies. Type from 1-1/2
+ mi. N Fowler, Meade County, Kansas.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius major_ Davis. Type from 8 mi. W Clarendon,
+ Donley County, Texas.
+
+ _Geomys bursarius llanensis_ Bailey. Type from Llano, Llano
+ County, Texas.
+
+
+
+
+LITERATURE CITED
+
+
+ALLEN, J. A.
+ 1874. Notes on the mammals of portions of Kansas, Colorado,
+ Wyoming and Utah. Part I. On the mammals of middle and western
+ Kansas. Bull. Essex Inst., 6 (no. 2):43-52. February, 1874.
+
+ 1895. List of mammals collected in the Black Hills region of
+ South Dakota and in western Kansas by Mr. Walter W. Granger
+ with field notes by the collector. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,
+ 7:259-274. August 21, 1895.
+
+ALLEN, P.
+ 1940. Kansas mammals. Kansas State Teachers College, Emporia,
+ Bull. Inf. Stud. in Educ., Number 20 (no. 5):l-62. May, 1940.
+
+BAKER, A. B.
+ 1889. Mammals of western Kansas. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+ 11:56-58 (for 1887-88).
+
+BAIRD, S. F.
+ 1857. Explorations and surveys for a railroad route from the
+ Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean. War Department.
+ Mammals, Part I, xxxii + 757, pls. 17-60, 35 figs. in text,
+ 1857.
+
+BLACK, J. D.
+ 1937. Mammals of Kansas. Thirtieth Bienn. Rept. Kansas State
+ Board of Agric., 35:116-217.
+
+DAVIS, W. B.
+ 1940. Distribution and variation of pocket gophers (Genus
+ Geomys) in the southwestern United States. Texas Agric. Exp.
+ Station, Bull., 590:1-38, 6 figs. in text. October 23, 1940.
+
+HIBBARD, C. W.
+ 1933. A revised check list of Kansas mammals. Trans. Kansas
+ Acad. Sci., 36:230-249.
+
+ 1944. A checklist of Kansas mammals, 1943. Trans. Kansas Acad.
+ Sci., 47:61-88.
+
+HOOPER, E. T.
+ 1940. A new race of pocket gopher of the species Geomys
+ lutescens from Colorado. Occas. Papers, Mus. Zooel., Univ.
+ Michigan, 420:1-3. June 28, 1940.
+
+KNOX, M. V. B.
+ 1875. Kansas Mammalia. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 4:18-22.
+
+KOMAREK, E. V. , and SPENCER, D. A.
+ 1931. A new pocket gopher from Illinois and Indiana. Journ.
+ Mamm., 12:404-408, 1 pl., 1 fig. in text. November 11, 1931.
+
+LANTZ, D. E.
+ 1905. Kansas mammals in their relations to agriculture. Kansas
+ State Agric. College Bull., 129:331-404. April, 1905.
+
+ 1905. A list of Kansas mammals. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
+ 19:171-178.
+
+ 1907. Additions and corrections to the list of Kansas mammals.
+ Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 20 (pt. 2):214-217.
+
+MERRIAM, C. H.
+ 1890. Descriptions of twenty-six new species of North American
+ mammals. N. Amer. Fauna, 4: v + 60, 3 pls., 3 figs. in text.
+ October 8, 1890.
+
+ 1895. Monographic revision of the pocket gopher Family
+ Geomyidae.... N. Amer. Fauna, 8:1-258, 19 pls. and
+ frontispiece, 71 figs. in text, 4 maps. January 31, 1895.
+
+SCHEFFER, T. H.
+ 1910. The pocket gopher. Kansas State Agric. Coll. Ent. and
+ Zooel. Dept., Bull., 172:197-233, illustrated. September, 1910.
+
+ 1931. Habits and economic status of the pocket gophers. U. S.
+ Dept. Agric., Tech. Bull., 224:1-27, 8 pls., 2 figs. in text.
+ January, 1931.
+
+SWENK, M. H.
+ 1939. A study of local size variations in the prairie pocket
+ gopher (Geomys bursarius), with description of a new subspecies
+ from Nebraska. Missouri Valley Fauna, 1:1-8. December 5, 1939.
+
+ 1940. A study of subspecific variation in the yellow pocket
+ gopher (Geomys lutescens) in Nebraska, and the geographical and
+ ecological distribution of the variants. Missouri Valley Fauna,
+ 2:1-12. February 1, 1940.
+
+_Transmitted May 30, 1947._
+
+
+ PRINTED BY
+ FRED VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER
+ TOPEKA, KANSAS
+ 1947
+ 21-8188
+
+
+
+
+Transcriber Notes:
+
+
+Minor typographical errors were corrected without notice.
+
+Italic words and phrases are marked _like this_.
+
+Bold words and phrases are marked =like this=.
+
+Small caps are converted to all upper case, LIKE THIS.
+
+Superscripts in text are indicated by use of the caret, like this ^4.
+
+
+
+
+
+End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Subspeciation in Pocket Gophers of
+Kansas, [KU. Vol. 1 No. 11], by Bernardo Villa-R and E. Raymond Hall
+
+*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK POCKET GOPHERS ***
+
+***** This file should be named 36653.txt or 36653.zip *****
+This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
+ http://www.gutenberg.org/3/6/6/5/36653/
+
+Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Matthew Wheaton
+and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
+http://www.pgdp.net
+
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
+will be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
+one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
+(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
+permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
+set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
+copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
+protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project
+Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
+charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you
+do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
+rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
+such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
+research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
+practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is
+subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
+redistribution.
+
+
+
+*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
+http://gutenberg.org/license).
+
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
+all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
+If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
+terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
+entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
+and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
+or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
+collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
+individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
+located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
+copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
+works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
+are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
+Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
+freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
+this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
+the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
+keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
+Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
+a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
+the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
+before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
+creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
+Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
+the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
+States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
+access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
+whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
+phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
+Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
+copied or distributed:
+
+This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
+almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
+re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
+with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
+
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
+from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
+posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
+and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
+or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
+with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
+work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
+through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
+Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
+1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
+terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
+to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
+permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
+word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
+distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
+"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
+posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
+you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
+copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
+request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
+form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
+that
+
+- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+ the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
+ you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
+ owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
+ has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
+ Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
+ must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
+ prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
+ returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
+ sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
+ address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
+ the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+ you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+ does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
+ License. You must require such a user to return or
+ destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
+ and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
+ Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
+ money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+ electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
+ of receipt of the work.
+
+- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+ distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
+electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
+forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
+both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
+Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
+Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
+collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
+"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
+property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
+computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
+your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
+of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
+your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
+the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
+refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
+providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
+receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
+is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
+opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
+WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
+If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
+law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
+interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
+the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
+provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
+with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
+promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
+harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
+that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
+or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
+work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
+Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
+
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
+including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
+because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
+people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
+To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
+and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
+
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
+Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
+http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
+permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
+
+The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
+Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
+throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
+809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
+business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
+information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
+page at http://pglaf.org
+
+For additional contact information:
+ Dr. Gregory B. Newby
+ Chief Executive and Director
+ gbnewby@pglaf.org
+
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
+spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
+SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
+particular state visit http://pglaf.org
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
+To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
+
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
+works.
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
+concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
+with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
+Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
+
+
+Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+
+Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
+
+ http://www.gutenberg.org
+
+This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/36653.zip b/36653.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2443561
--- /dev/null
+++ b/36653.zip
Binary files differ
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c042bd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #36653 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/36653)