diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:08:50 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 20:08:50 -0700 |
| commit | 4e753b27516f0b6086a3734f6c3b9e0347909f7c (patch) | |
| tree | 3c96349ba22118e3fe78816b679839d3b00f2b47 /37792-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '37792-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 37792-h/37792-h.htm | 14929 |
1 files changed, 14929 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/37792-h/37792-h.htm b/37792-h/37792-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2bf54a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/37792-h/37792-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,14929 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<!-- $Id: header.txt 236 2009-12-07 18:57:00Z vlsimpson $ --> + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of England, Canada and the Great War, by Lieutenant-Colonel L.-G. Desjardins. + </title> + <style type="text/css"> + +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + + h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { + text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ + clear: both; +} + +p { + margin-top: .75em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .75em; +} + +hr { + width: 33%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; +} + +table { + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; +} + +.pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ + /* visibility: hidden; */ + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: smaller; + font-style: normal; + text-align: right; +} /* page numbers */ + +.blockquot { + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +.center {text-align: center;} + +.right {text-align: right;} + +.smcap {font-variant: small-caps; font-style: normal;} + +.tnote { + border: dashed 1px; + margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; + padding-bottom: .5em; padding-top: .5em; + padding-left: .5em; padding-right: .5em; +} + + </style> + </head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of England, Canada and the Great War, by +Louis-Georges Desjardins + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: England, Canada and the Great War + +Author: Louis-Georges Desjardins + +Release Date: October 18, 2011 [EBook #37792] + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGLAND, CANADA AND THE GREAT WAR *** + + + + +Produced by Moti Ben-Ari and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net. (This file was +produced from images generously made available by The +Internet Archive.) + + + + + + +</pre> + +<div class="center">[Chapter numbering is as in the original publication, omitting chapter +numbers XXV and XXVI. (note of etext transcriber.)]<br /> <br /> <br /></div> + + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_i" id="Page_i">[i]</a></span></p> + + + +<h1>ENGLAND, CANADA and the GREAT WAR</h1> + +<h3>BY</h3> + +<h2>Lieutenant-Colonel L.-G. DESJARDINS</h2> + +<div class="center">Ex-member of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Quebec +and of the House of Commons of Canada.</div> + +<hr style="width: 45%;" /> + +<div class="center"> +QUEBEC<br /> +Chronicle Print.<br /> +<br /> +October 1st, 1918 +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ii" id="Page_ii">[ii]</a></span></p> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_iii" id="Page_iii">[iii]</a></span></p> +<h2>PREFACE.</h2> + + +<p>Even since the issue, last year, of my book:—"<i>L'Angleterre, +Le Canada et la Grande Guerre</i>"—"<i>England, +Canada and the Great War</i>"—a second +edition of which I had to publish, a few weeks +later, to meet the pressing demand of numerous +readers—I have been repeatedly asked by influential +citizens to publish an English edition of my +work.</p> + +<p>A delegate from Quebec to the National Unity—or +Win-the-War—Convention, in Montreal, I +had the pleasure of meeting a great many of the +delegates from Toronto and all over the Dominion. +Many of them insisted upon the publication of an +English edition.</p> + +<p>Having written that book for the express and +patriotic purpose of proving the justice of the +cause of the Allies in the Great War, and refuting +Mr. Bourassa's false and dangerous theories, I +realized that the citizens of Quebec, Montreal, +Ottawa and Toronto, who strongly advised an +English edition to be circulated in all the Provinces, +appreciated the good it could make.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_iv" id="Page_iv">[iv]</a></span></p> + +<p>I consider it is my imperious duty to dedicate +to my English speaking countrymen this volume +containing all the substance matter of my French +book, and the defense a truly loyal French +Canadian has made of the sacred cause of Civilization +and Liberty for the triumph of which the +glorious Allied Nations have been so heroically +fighting for the last four eventful years.</p> + +<p>As I say, in the Introduction to this work, I +first intended to write only an English resumé of +my French book. But once at work writing down, +the questions to consider were so important, and +the replies to the Nationalist leader's inconceivable +theories so numerous, that I had to double +and more the pages I had thought would be sufficient +for my purpose. I realized that many points, +to be fully explained, required more comments and +argumentation that I had at first supposed +necessary.</p> + +<p>Moreover, since writing my French book, most +important events have taken place. To have the +present English volume up to date, I had to consider +recent history in its very latest developments, +and reply to the Nationalist leader's last errors, +which by no means were not the least. When once<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[v]</a></span> +a man has run off the path of reason and sound +public sense, he is sure to rush to most dangerous +extremes, unless he has the moral courage to +acknowledge that he was sadly mistaken.</p> + +<p>I trust that the English speaking readers of +this book, will not, for a single moment, suppose +that I am actuated by the least ill-feeling against +Mr. Bourassa personally, in the severe but just +denunciation it was my plain duty to make of his +deplorable Nationalist campaign.</p> + +<p>For many years past, I have ever been delighted +in welcoming promising young men to the responsibilities +of public life. I remember with a +mixed feeling of pleasure and regret the occasion +I first heard Mr. Bourassa, then a youth, addressing +a very large public meeting held on the nomination +day of the candidates to a pending bye-election +for the House of Commons of Canada: Pleasure at +the recollection of what I considered a fairly successful +beginning of a political career; deep regret +at the failure to justify the hopes of his compatriots +and his friends through an uncontrollable ambition +always sure to deter, even the best gifted, +from the safe line of duty, well understood, and +firmly, but modestly, performed.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[vi]</a></span></p> + +<p>Passion, aspiring and unbridled, is always a +dangerous counsellor. Mr. Bourassa could have +had a useful political life, if he had realized that +public good cannot be well served by constant appeals +to race prejudices, and by persevering efforts +to achieve success by stirring up fanaticism.</p> + +<p>The result of the unpatriotic course he has +followed, against the advice of his best friends, has +been to sow in our great and happy Dominion the +seed of discord, of hatred, of racial conflicts.</p> + +<p>Unfortunately, for the country, for his French +Canadian compatriots, and for himself, he was deluded +to the point of believing that the war would +be his grand opportunity.</p> + +<p>Instead of using his influence to promote the +national unity so essential under the trying circumstances +with which Canada and the whole +British Empire was suddenly confronted, he exerted +himself to the utmost to prevail on his +French Canadian countrymen to assume a decisive +hostile stand to the noble cause which Britain had +to fight for, in order to avenge the crime of the +violation of Belgium's territory, to protect France +from German cruel invasion, and to prevent Autocratic +power from enslaving Humanity.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[vii]</a></span></p> + +<p>Such a misconception of a truly loyal man's +part was most detrimental to the good of Canada's +future, to the destinies of the French Canadians, +and to the political standing of the publicist who +was its willing victim.</p> + +<p>And to-day he finds himself in this position +that he has no other choice but that of pursuing, at +all hazards, his unwholesome campaign against +all things British, or, boldly retracing his steps, to +go back on all he has said and written to support +inadmissible views, vain ideas, and passionate +prejudices.</p> + +<p>The latter course would certainly be the best +to follow in the interest of his country, of his +French Canadian countrymen, and of his usefulness +as a public man. But, however much to be regretted, +he seems utterly unable to overcome the +prejudices which have taken such deep root in his +heart and mind.</p> + +<p>Prejudice, constantly cultured, soon develops +into blind fanaticism, closing the intellect to the +light of sound logic, to the call of duty, to the clear +comprehension of what is best to do to promote +the public good.</p> + +<p>However seriously guilty he may be, the public<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[viii]</a></span> +man, so swayed by a fanatical passion, is sure not +to rally to the defense of the superior interests of +his countrymen when they are threatened by a +great misfortune.</p> + +<p>I cannot help deploring that after giving good +hopes of a life patriotically devoted to the increasing +welfare of Canada, by doing his share in promoting +the best feelings among his countrymen of +all races, classes and creeds, one of my kin, really +gifted to play a much better part, has been so sadly +mistaken as to exhaust his activities in forcing his +way to the leadership of a group of malcontents +unable to overcome their racial antipathies and +listen to reason, even when their country and the +Empire to which they have sworn allegiance are +destructively menaced.</p> + +<p>He has nobody else to blame but himself for +the failure of his political career, due to his misguided +efforts in thwarting the happiness and +prosperity which our great Dominion would certainly +derive from the persevering union of all the +citizens enjoying the blessings of her free British +institutions, to work out her brilliant destinies by +their intelligent labours, their hearted patriotism +in peace times, and with their undaunted courage +and their self-sacrificing devotion in war days.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">[ix]</a></span></p> + +<p>After a somewhat prolonged spectacular display +in the House of Commons, as member for the +electoral division of Labelle, he felt instinctively +that he had exhausted what he considered his usefulness, +and was doomed to a dismal failure. He +retired from the Dominion political arena, to try +his luck in the Legislative Assembly of the Province +of Quebec. No wiser a man by experience, he +challenged the Leader of the parliamentary majority +to a truly duellist struggle on the floor of the +House. He thrusted at his opponent with the vigour +of a combatant certain to conquer. All those +who witnessed this encounter, must remember how +completely overbearing confidence, proudly asserted, +was overcome by calm and superior argumentative +power, sound and clear political sense. True +parliamentary eloquence easily brought to reason +pedantic and bombastic oratory. The first throw—<i>le +début</i>—went decidedly against the Nationalist +leader. A beaten fighter from this very first day, +he met with as complete a failure in the provincial +political arena as he had done in the federal one. +Wisely indeed, he retired from parliamentary +life, after realizing that debating power cannot be +acquired by demagogic speaking.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">[x]</a></span></p> + +<p>The Nationalist leader next limited his efforts +to the tribune, to the public platform. All remember +the time when he was periodically calling +great popular meetings held in <i>Le Monument +National</i>, Montreal, where he preached his Nationalist +gospel with vehement talking. This new +experiment could not last. It soon subsided. And +the Nationalist leader is since addicted to pamphleteering +of the worst kind as I will show in +this book.</p> + +<p>Deeply moved by the dangers of a most mischievous +campaign, I considered it my bounded +duty to do my utmost efforts to prove how utterly +wrong were the views which those pursuing it with +passionate energy wanted to prevail, and to show +the sad consequences it was sure to produce.</p> + +<p>Having first addressed myself to my French +Canadian compatriots to persuade them how much +detrimental to their best future the Nationalist +campaign was sure to be, I am to-day laying the +case before my English speaking countrymen, at +the urgent request of many of them, in order to +fully acquaint them with the refutation I have +made, to the best of my ability, of Mr. Bourassa's +erroneous theories and wild charges against England<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xi" id="Page_xi">[xi]</a></span> +and all those who patriotically support our +mother country in the great struggle she has had +to wage after doing all she possibly could to maintain +the peace of the world.</p> + +<p>I ardently desire that the reading of the following +pages, will contribute to the restoration of +harmony and good will, for a while endangered by +the Nationalist campaign, in our wide Dominion, +to whose happiness, prosperity and grandeur we, +of both English and French origins, must devote +our best energies and all the resources of our +unwavering patriotism.</p> + +<div class="right"> +L. G. DESJARDINS.<br /> +</div> + +<p>Quebec, October 1st, 1918.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xii" id="Page_xii">[xii]</a></span></p> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xiii" id="Page_xiii">[xiii]</a></span></p> +<h2>CONTENTS</h2> + +<div class="center"> +<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" summary=""> +<tr><td align="right">Chapter</td><td align="left"></td><td align="right">Page</td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Introduction</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_1">1</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">I</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Who are the Guilty Parties?</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_25">25</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">II</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Persistent Efforts of England in Favour of Peace</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_29">29</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">III</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Call to Duty in Canada</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_40">40</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">IV</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Recruiting by Voluntary Service</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_46">46</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">V</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Intervention of Nationalism</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_49">49</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VI</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">What Do We Owe England?</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_51">51</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Canada is not a Sovereign State</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_55">55</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">VIII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">German Illusions</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_67">67</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">IX</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Nationalist Error</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_68">68</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">X</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Had Canada the Right to Help England?</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_71">71</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XI</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Duty of Canada</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_74">74</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Soudanese and the South African Wars</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_77">77</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XIII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">British and German Aspirations Compared</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_87">87</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;"><span class="smcap">Sub-title—Construction and Supply</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_93">93</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">Transport</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_97">97</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">The Air Service</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_98">98</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">The Financial Effort of Great Britain</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_100">100</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">Achievements of Dominion, Colonial and Indian Troops</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XIV<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xiv" id="Page_xiv">[xiv]</a></span></td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Veritable Aims of the Allies</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_104">104</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;"><span class="smcap">Sub-title—The Only Possible Peace Conditions</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_111">111</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XV</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Just and Unjust Wars</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_116">116</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;"><span class="smcap">Sub-title—A "Nationalist" Illogical Charge against England</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_125">125</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">Other "Nationalist" Erroneous Assertions</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_128">128</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">Incredible "Nationalist" Notions</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_131">131</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">Canadian Financial Operations in the United States</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_134">134</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XVI</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">"Nationalist" Views Condensed</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_139">139</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XVII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Loyal Principles Propounded</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_143">143</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;"><span class="smcap">Sub-title—Unjust "Nationalist" Grievances against England</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_150">150</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XVIII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Imperialism</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_164">164</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XIX</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">American Imperialism</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_177">177</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XX</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">British Imperialism</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_189">189</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXI</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Situations of 1865 and 1900-14 Compared</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_194">194</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">British Imperialism Naturally Pacifist</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_198">198</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXIII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">British Imperialism and Political Liberty</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_207">207</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXIV</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Imperial Federation and "Bourassism"</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_216">216</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;"><span class="smcap">Sub-title—Constitutional Development of India</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_227">227</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXVII<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xv" id="Page_xv">[xv]</a></span></td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Future Constitutional Relations of the Empire</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_231">231</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;"><span class="smcap">Sub-title—No Taxation Without Representation</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_235">235</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">Colonial Representation</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_236">236</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">The Far Off Future</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_247">247</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">A Machiavellian Proposition</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_251">251</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"></td><td align="left"><span style="margin-left: 3em;">" —<span class="smcap">A Treasonable Proposal</span></span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_259">259</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXVIII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Outrages are No Reasons</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_267">267</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXIX</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">How Mr. Bourassa Paid His Compliments to the Canadian Army</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_277">277</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXX</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Rash Denunciation of Public Men</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_288">288</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXXI</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Mr. Bourassa's Dangerous Pacifism</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_302">302</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXXII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">A Most Reprehensible Abuse of Sacred Appeals to the Belligerent Nations</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_307">307</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXXIII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">A Case For True Statesmanship</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_321">321</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXXIV</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">After-the-War Military Problem</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_324">324</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXXV</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Intervention of the United States in the War</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_334">334</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXXVI</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Allies—Russia—Japan</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_348">348</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXXVII</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">The Last Peace Proposals</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_357">357</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXXVIII<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xvi" id="Page_xvi">[xvi]</a></span></td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Necessary Peace Conditions</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_372">372</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right">XXXIX</td><td align="left">—<span class="smcap">Conclusion</span></td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_383">383</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"><span class="smcap">Appendix</span></td><td align="left">—A</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_411">411</a></td></tr> +<tr><td align="right"><span class="smcap">Appendix</span></td><td align="left">—B</td><td align="right"><a href="#Page_421">421</a></td></tr> +</table> +</div> + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[1]</a></span></p> +<h2>INTRODUCTION.</h2> + + +<p>Canada, as one of the most important +component parts of the British Empire, is going +through the crucial ordeal of the great crisis which +will determine her destinies jointly with those of +the whole world. Instantly put under the strain, +four years ago, by the outrageous challenge of +Germany to human civilization with the criminal +purpose of universal domination, she was fully +equal to her unbounded duty. Conscious of her +sacred rights, she at once realized that the constitutional +liberties which she enjoyed in the freest +Empire of all times, could not be more patriotically +exercised than for the defence of the sacred +cause which united in a gigantic effort England, +France and Russia, soon to receive the support of +Italy. By an almost unanimous and enthusiastic +decision she rallied to the flag around which all<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[2]</a></span> +the Dependencies of the Empire gathered from the +five continents. Never a more inspiring array of +loyal subjects, owing allegiance to a Sovereignty, +was witnessed in the wide world.</p> + +<p>Through the trying days of four full years of +the greatest war which ever saddened the life of +the human race, Canada has nobly, gloriously, +done her duty. Several hundred thousands of her +devoted sons have rushed to the front to fight +the battle of Liberty, of Right, of Civilization. +Thousands of them have heroically given their +lives for the triumph of the cause which, if finally +triumphant, will brighten with freedom, prosperity, +human happiness and undying glory, the +destinies of many generations.</p> + +<p>The struggle is not over. The battle is not +yet won. Victory is in sight but unfortunately +still so far distant, that it is still calling forth the +undaunted exertions of all those who have pledged +their faith to rescue the world from the cruel +thraldom of German militarism.</p> + +<p>Two years ago, at the critical period which +culminated in the undecided military operations +which, though rendered illustrious by the glorious +defence of Verdun, made it plain to the Allies that +success would only be the reward of a much more +prolonged effort of untold sacrifices, I undertook<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[3]</a></span> +to write the book entitled in French: "<i>L'Angleterre, +le Canada et la Grande Guerre</i>."</p> + +<p>Several of the most influential and widely circulated +News-papers of Montreal, Toronto and +Quebec, have kindly published highly appreciative +Reviews of the French Edition of my book, concluding +with the request of the publication of an +English Edition, which, they affirmed, would be +conducive to the public good. I have received +many letters and verbal demands to the same +purpose.</p> + +<p>It is my duty to answer to a call daily becoming +more pressing.</p> + +<p>I now offer to the English reading public a +condensed edition of my work, with the title +"<i>England, Canada and the Great War</i>." I concluded +not to issue a complete English Edition of +the French volume. Instead of translating my +book, I considered it more advisable to write an +English synopsis of its contents. Undertaking +such a work, I realized more than ever how important +it is for the Citizens of Canada to be able +to speak and write the languages of the two great +races of the Dominion. Knowing well my own deficiency +in this regard, I hoped, however, to write +the following pages with enough clearness to have +my views well understood, trusting to the kindness<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[4]</a></span> +of my readers to excuse the inadequacy of my +command of English.</p> + +<p>A few words explaining the reasons that +prompted me to write the French book will, I am +confident, be kindly appreciated by my readers. +A close observer of the daily impressions which the +events developed by the war were creating in +Canada, I felt more and more deeply grieved at the +persistent and unpatriotic efforts of the leaders +of the Nationalist school of the Province of Quebec, +and their henchmen, to sway my French-Canadian +countrymen from the clear path of duty. +I undertook earnestly to do my best to stem the +threatening wave of disloyal sentiments and racial +conflict they were stirring up throughout the land. +"<i>England, Canada and the Great War</i>" was the +result of the very careful study of the numerous +questions therein considered and of the patriotic +impulse which led me to publish it.</p> + +<p>I dedicated the volume to my French-Canadian +countrymen by a letter from which I translate +the following:</p> + +<p>"It would surely be vain to conceal how serious +was the situation imposed upon our country +by the sudden outbreak, in August, 1914, of the +greatest war of all times. It was dominated by +the supreme fact that Canada was a component<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[5]</a></span> +part of one of the most powerful Empires whose +destinies were to be determined, for good or +ill, for many long years, by the terrible conflict +suddenly opened, but, for a prolonged period, prepared +by those who dreamt of conquering the +world."</p> + +<p>"Great Britain, our Sovereign Metropolis, had +done her utmost to protect Humanity against the +misfortunes which endangered her future, for the +maintenance of peace. She had failed in her noble +efforts. At the very moment when, against all +the most critical appearances, she was still hopeful, +she had, all of a sudden, to face the terrible +alternative, either to submit to national dishonour +by complying with the violation of solemn treaties +which bound her as much as Germany, or to unite +with France and Russia to avenge Justice +outrageously violated, sworn international Faith, +Civilization perilously threatened."</p> + +<p>"Could she hesitate for one single moment?"</p> + +<p>"Our Mother Country has done that which +her most imperious duty commanded her to do. +She accepted the challenge of Germany with the +patriotic determination inspired by the most +sacred cause. All the loyal subjects of the British +Crown have applauded her decision to rush to the +defence of invaded Belgium and France, to reclaim<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[6]</a></span> +their national honour and her own, and to protect +her Empire against the German armies."</p> + +<p>"With the most inspiring unanimity and +admirable courage, all the British Colonies have +rallied around the flag of their Sovereign Metropolis +to share the glory of the triumph of Right and +Justice. At the very front rank, Canada has +nobly done her duty. Her decision was most +spontaneous and decisive. She was not deterred by +fallacious subtilties, deducted from pretended +conventions, out of age and opportunity, to hinder +her laudable and patriotic course. Throughout the +length and breadth of her vast territory, all minds +shared the same view, all hearts were united and +beating with the same powerful sentiment."</p> + +<p>"The decision of Canada to participate in +the present war was taken by the constitutional +government of the country, sanctioned by +Parliament, approved by public opinion, glorified +by the hundreds of thousands of brave volunteers +who courageously answered the call of duty."</p> + +<p>"Views with which I cannot concur have been +expressed and given full publicity. They challenge +discussion. It is my undoubted right to criticize +them."</p> + +<p>"Since the beginning of the present war, Mr. +Henri Bourassa, in addition to the daily publicity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[7]</a></span> +of his journal "<i>Le Devoir</i>", has developed, in two +principal pamphlets, the theories of his "<i>Nationalism</i>". +They are respectively entitled: "<i>Que devons-nous +à l'Angleterre?</i>" "<i>What do we owe England?</i>" +and: "<i>Hier, Aujourd'hui, Demain</i>" "<i>Yesterday, +To-day, To-morrow</i>"."</p> + +<p>"In earnestly searching out the real causes of +the war, the responsibilities of the belligerent +nations, their respective aspirations, the duty +imposed by the irresistable course of events upon +the British Empire and consequently upon Canada, +I was incessantly called upon to consider the +very strange propositions contained in those +pamphlets."</p> + +<p>"It was with great surprise that I read, for +instance, as the heading of one of the chapters, the +utterly false proposition that: "<i>The Autonomous +Colonies are Sovereign States.</i>"</p> + +<p>"And these most extraordinary affirmations +that the <i>King of England has not the right to +declare the State of war for Canada, without the +assent of the Canadian Cabinet; that Canada could +have participated in the present war as a Nation</i>."</p> + +<p>"It is my bounden duty to affirm that almost +all the propositions contained in the two above +mentioned pamphlets are wrong according to +international law and to constitutional law,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[8]</a></span> +erroneous in their historical bearings, contrary to +the true teachings of the past."</p> + +<p>"Mr. Bourassa persistingly trying to convince +his readers that the precedents of the Soudanese +and the South-African wars have forced the +British Colonies to participate in the present one, I +considered it my duty to make, in two separate +chapters, a special study of those military campaigns +which, in both cases, were so felicitously +terminated for all parties concerned."</p> + +<p>"I cannot close this letter without expressing +my profound regret that Mr. Bourassa has thought +proper to use most injurious language adding +outrage to the falsity of his opinions. At page 121 +of his pamphlet: "<i>Yesterday, To-day, To-morrow</i>", +any one can read, no doubt with astonishment, +that Mr. Bourassa charges our countrymen of the +British races with being <i>ignorant, assuming, arrogant, +dominating and rotten with mercantilism</i>."</p> + +<p>"Such ridiculous and insulting words to the +address of our countrymen of the three British +races are surely not calculated to increase Canadian +harmony."</p> + +<p>"This book, written for the express purpose +of assisting you to form for yourselves a sound +opinion about the terrible events so rapidly +developing, was inspired by my loyalty to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[9]</a></span> +Empire whose faithful subject I glory to be, by my +devotion to Canada and to my countrymen, by the +affectionate recollection of France I will cherish +to my last day.</p> + +<p>"During the last fifty years, either as a private +or as an officer of the Canadian Militia—my +service as such having lasted more than forty years—as +a member of the Legislative Assembly of the +Province of Quebec, and as a member of the House +of Commons of Canada, I have often taken the oath +of allegiance to the Sovereign of Great Britain. +From my early youth, I had learned that under +the ægis of the British Crown, the citizen of the +Empire could be true to his oath, and enjoy the +precious liberty of expressing his opinion. But I +had also soon realized that during the lifetime of +a Sovereign State, days of peril might occur. I +had easily come to the conclusion that in those trying +moments the loyal duty could be very happily +reconciled with the most sincere love of political +liberty.</p> + +<p>"In defending with the most sincere conviction +the sacred cause of the Allies, I am doing my +duty as a free subject of the British Empire, as a +citizen of Canada and of the Province of Quebec, +as a son of France, as a devoted servant of Justice +and Right. I am true to my oath."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[10]</a></span></p> + +<p>I desire to call the special attention of my +readers to the complete sense of the last paragraph +just quoted. I most decidedly wish its meaning +to be fully understood by all, as I intended to +convey it to my French Canadian compatriots. I +have never concurred in the subtle distinction so +often made between the several notions entertained +by many respecting their duty towards the Empire +and Canada separately. Having witnessed, for +the last fifty years, the admirable evolution and +natural growth of the British constitutional +system over a fourth of the globe, developing into +the freest Empire that ever existed, my mind was +more and more impressed with the conviction that +loyalty to the Sovereignty presiding over such a +magnificent national heritage could not be of two +different kinds. A free British subject, whether +living in the United Kingdom, or in any one of the +Dependencies of the Crown, cannot be at once loyal +to the Empire at large and disloyal to any of its +component parts; or, <i>vice versa</i>, loyal to the particular +section of the State where he is living and +at the same disloyal to the Empire. Such a false +conception of the duties of loyalty, if it could be +spread successfully throughout the Empire, would +undoubtedly lead to its rapid dissolution and complete +destruction. Genuine loyalty cannot agree<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[11]</a></span> +with exclusive and rampant sectionalism, with +local, racial or religious prejudices and fanaticism.</p> + +<p>The few lines of the preceding closing paragraph +of my letter dedicating the French edition +of my book as aforesaid, express my own conception +of the true loyalty of a faithful subject of the +British Sovereignty, who has the clear vision of the +meaning of his oath of allegiance. In consequence, +first, I affirm my duty as a subject of the +British Empire; second, as a citizen of Canada; +third, as a citizen of my own Province of Quebec. +And then, taking a wider range of the duty of any +man towards his ancestors' lineage, I declare that +under the cruel circumstances of the case, I also +consider it is my duty to defend France against +her deadly enemy. Further enlarging the vision +of duty to its fullest extent, I say that I am bound +to defend the cause of the Allies by proving that I +am a loyal servant of Justice and Right.</p> + +<p>Surely I could not emphasize in terms more +pregnant my loyalty to the cause of the British +Empire, of France, and their Allies, of Liberty and +Civilization. I confidently hope they will persuade +my readers that this book was written with the +most sincere and patriotic desire to help rallying +my French Canadian compatriots to the defence +of the British, French and Canadian flags,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[12]</a></span> +which must together emerge triumphant from the +gigantic fight against the most threatening wave +of barbarism the world has ever had to contend +with at the cost of so great and heroic sacrifices.</p> + +<p>When the first French edition of this book +was issued, in January of last year, matters respecting +the prosecution of the war had not yet +required the serious consideration by Parliament +and the country of the question of conscription to +maintain to their proper efficiency the Canadian +divisions on the firing line. Consequently, I was +not then called upon to consider that most important +subject. When I had to decide about publishing +a second French edition—the first being +entirely exhausted—I at first thought of adding +to my work a few chapters respecting the most +notable events developed by the gigantic struggle +shaking the world to its very basic foundation. +Foremost amongst them were the Russian sudden +Revolution, the solemn entrance of the United +States into the great fight, the imperious necessity +of the military effort of the Allies far beyond that +which had been foreseen, in order to achieve the +final victory which will be the only adequate reward +of their undaunted determination not to +sheathe the sword before Germany will agree to +restore peace upon the only possible conditions<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[13]</a></span> +which will efficiently protect humanity from any +other attempt at brutal universal domination. The +question of conscription in Canada was the natural +outcome of the progress of the deadly conflict +between Civilization and barbarism, constitutional +Freedom and despotism, democratic institutions +and autocracy.</p> + +<p>I soon realized that I could not properly do +justice to such grave subjects in a few pages added +to my first book. After mature consideration, I +considered it was my duty to undertake to write a +second volume. I have so informed the public +in the <i>Advertisement</i> which prefaces the second +French edition of the first. This second volume +I will soon issue, also intending to publish an +English synopsis of it, if that of the first volume +meets the kind appreciation I hope of my English +speaking countrymen.</p> + +<p>However, pending the publication of the second +volume, I think it is my duty to express now +my views, in a summary way, on that much discussed +question of obligatory military service. +Let me preface by saying that they are not new, +having originated in my mind more than thirty +years ago. The military necessities of the present +war have, of course, given them more precision +and clearness.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[14]</a></span></p> + +<p>Deeply conscious of the sacred duty of all +truly loyal British subjects through the present +prolonged world crisis for the life or death of +human Liberty, I had to consider conscription +from the double stand-point of a free citizen of +Canada and of my military experience acquired +in the course of a service of over forty years.</p> + +<p>Most strongly and convincingly opposed to +the militarism of the atrocious German type—the +curse of Humanity—I have always believed—and +do still more and more believe—imbued, I hope, +with the true sense and principles of democratic +institutions, that the greatest boon that could be +granted the world would be that the admirable +Christian law of peace and good-will amongst men +would prevail for all times, and save the nations +from the cruel obligation of keeping themselves +constantly fully armed at the great cost of the best +years of manhood, and of their accumulated treasures. +But unfortunately it has not yet been the +good luck of man to reach the goal of this most +noble ambition. Instead of a steady advance in +the right direction, he has, for the last fifty years, +experienced a most dangerous set back by the predominating +influence of German militarism, developed +and mastered by the most autocratic +power to the point of threatening the liberties of +the whole world.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[15]</a></span></p> + +<p>Need I say that, as a purely philosophical +question of principle, I most sincerely deplore that +the political state of the world has been and is +such that national safety cannot be, in too many +cases, properly assured without the law of the +land calling upon the manhood of a country to +make the sacrifice of part of the best years of +enthusiastic youth, and requiring from the nation, +as a collective body, the expenditure, to an +untold amount, for the purposes of defence, of the +accumulated savings of hard work and intelligent +thrift.</p> + +<p>Fortunately, the two continents of America, +so abundantly blessed by Providence, had, until +the present war, been able to pursue their prosperous +and dignified course free from the entanglements +of European Militarism.</p> + +<p>Even England, in all the majesty of her Imperial +power, her flag gloriously waving over so +many millions of free men, protected as she was +by the waves which she ruled with grandeur and +grace, had succeeded in avoiding the curse of +continental conscriptionism.</p> + +<p>Between permanent conscription, despotically +imposed upon a nation under autocratic rule, and +temporary military compulsion freely accepted by +a noble people for the very purpose of saving<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[16]</a></span> +Humanity from military absolutism, there is, +every one must admit, a wide difference. I have +been, I am, and will be, to my last day, the uncompromising +opponent of autocratic conscription, +which I consider as a permanent crime against +Christian Civilization, and the ready instrument +of barbarous domination. To temporary compulsion +I can agree, as a matter of patriotic and national +duty, if the circumstances of the case are +such that without its timely use, my country which +has the first and undoubted right to my most +patriotic devotion, at the cost of all I may own and +even of my life, for her defence, would fall the +prey to despotism which would bleed her to death +to sway the world.</p> + +<p>Such is the ordeal through which Canada, the +British Empire, in fact much the greater part of +the universe, are passing with torrents of blood +shed to rescue Mankind from the domination of +German militarism.</p> + +<p>If Germany could have her course free; if she +could reach the goal of her criminal ambition, +nearly the whole world would be, for many long +years, in the throes of the most abominable conscriptionism.</p> + +<p>If after the enthusiasm of voluntary military +service has exhausted itself from the very successful<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[17]</a></span> +result of its patriotic effort, is it not a duty for +all loyal citizens to accept temporary compulsion, +to save their country from the horrors of defeat at +the hands of the most cruel enemy which has ever +shamed the light of the sun since it shines over the +Human race blessed with Christian principles and +moral teachings.</p> + +<p>To the present generation of young men, +strong, healthy, brave, let us say: be worthy of the +times you live in, be equal to the great task imposed +upon you, accepting with patriotism the +sacrifices you are called upon to make, never forgetting +that temporary compulsion for you means +freedom from permanent conscription for your +children and children's children in years to come.</p> + +<p>It is from the very height of such lofty considerations +that I have made up my mind about +this much vexed question which will, we must all +earnestly hope, be more and more well understood +and eventually settled to the everlasting good of +the country once for all delivered from the exasperating +menace of German despotism.</p> + +<p>I must reserve for the second volume of this +work, the fuller expression of my views of what +should be the military system to be maintained in +Canada, after the very wide experience we will +have derived from the present great war. All I<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[18]</a></span> +will add now is that ever since the early eighties of +the last century, after many years of voluntary +service in the Canadian Militia, I had fully realized +that it is no more possible to make a real soldier +by a few days yearly training, for three years, +than you can make a competent lawyer of a young +man studying law for a fortnight in the course of +three consecutive years.</p> + +<p>Since the federal Union of the Provinces we +had spent much more than a hundred million of +dollars for the training of our militia, with the +appalling result that when came the day of getting +ready for the fray, we had not two thousand men +to send at once to the firing line. The first thirty +thousands of the brave men who enthusiastically +volunteered to go to the front had to be trained, +at Valcartier and in England, several months before +being sent to face the enemy whose waves of +permanent divisions of armed men had overrun, +like a torrent, Belgium and northern France. Of +course, our boys fought and died like heroes, but +nevertheless we at last learned, at our great cost, +that soldiers no more than lawyers, doctors, +merchants, transportation managers, bankers, +business men of all callings, farmers, sailors, etc., +can be qualified in a day.</p> + +<p>When the time shall come to consider what<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[19]</a></span> +will be the requirements of our military organization, +after this terrible struggle is over, I hope +none will forget that war is a great science, an +awful and very difficult art, so that we shall not +deceive ourselves any longer by the illusion that +an army can be drawn from the earth in twenty +four hours.</p> + +<p>Our most efficient military commander cannot +entertain the foolish delusion of Pompey, so +crushingly beaten by Cæsar, at Pharsalia, that he +can raise legions by striking the ground with his +foot.</p> + +<p>If our future national circumstances turn out +to be such, after the restoration of peace, that we +will not be called upon to make heavy sacrifices for +defence—let Providence so bless our dear country—it +will then be much more rational to save our +money than to squander it on a military system +which cannot produce military efficiency.</p> + +<p>The future can be trusted to settle favourably +its own difficulties. For us of the present generation, +we have to attend to the imperative and sacred +duty of the hour. Let no one shirk his responsibilities, +waver in the heavy task, falter before the +sacrifices to be patriotically and heroically accepted. +To deserve the everlasting gratitude of future +generations, we must secure to them the blessings<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[20]</a></span> +of permanent peace in a renovated world freed +from the tyranny of autocratic despotism.</p> + +<p>Surely, I will be permitted to say that, undertaking +to write <i>England, Canada and the Great +War</i>, I fully realized my bounden duty to study all +the questions raised by the terrible struggle, unreservedly, +absolutely, outside of all party considerations, +of all racial prejudices. A party man, +in the only true and patriotic sense of the word, +during the twenty-five years of my active political +life, as a journalist and a member of the Quebec +Legislature and of the Parliament of Canada, it +became my lot in the official position which I was +asked to accept and which I loyally filled, to +all intents and purposes, for many years, to train +my mind more and more to judge public questions +solely from the point of view of the public good. +I do not mean to say that partyism, well understood +and patriotically practiced, is not productive +of good to a country blessed with free institutions. +But certainly in the course of a progressive, intelligent +and eventful national life, ennobled by Freedom +happily enjoyed, times occur when it behooves +every one to rise superior to all other considerations, +however important they may be, to serve the +only one worthy of all sacrifices: the salvation of +the country. Never was this principle so true, so<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[21]</a></span> +imperative, than on the day when the world was so +audaciously challenged by Germany to the deadly +conflict still raging with undiminished fury.</p> + +<p>That most important question of military +obligatory service, brought up by the pressure of +the imperious necessities of military operations, +lengthening and intensifying to unforeseen proportions, +was for many weeks considered by +Parliament. Surely, no one for a single moment +entertained the idea that, however desirable and +imperative it was for the representatives of the +people to be of only one mind so far as the prosecution +of Canada's share in the war was concerned, +constant unanimity of opinion was possible respecting +the various measures to be adopted to +that end. Parliament sitting in the performance +of its constitutional functions, with all its undoubted +privileges, could not be expected not to +exercise its right to debate all the matters constitutionally +proposed for its concurrence and +approval. I must certainly and wisely refrain from +any comment whatsoever upon the lengthy discussion +of the Military Service Act in both Houses in +Ottawa. Having received the Royal Assent, the +Bill is now the law of the land. All will patriotically +rejoice to see that without waiving their +right to pronounce upon the deeds and the views<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[22]</a></span> +of those who are responsible to them, the free citizens +of Canada will cheerfully accept the new sacrifices +imposed by the obligation of carrying the +war to a successful issue, praying to God to bless +their patriotic efforts, and even with the true +Christian spirit, to forgive guilty Germany if she +will only repent for her crimes, and agree to repair +a reasonable part of the immense damages she has +wrought upon trodden and martyred nations.</p> + +<p>I hope,—and most ardently wish—that all my +readers will agree with me that next to the necessity +of winning the war—and, may I say, even as of +almost equal importance for the future grandeur +of our beloved country—range that of promoting +by all lawful means harmony and good will +amongst all our countrymen, whatever may be +their racial origin, their religious faith, their particular +aspirations not conflicting with their devotion +to Canada as a whole, nor with their loyalty +to the British Empire, whose greatness and prestige +they want to firmly help to uphold with the +inspiring confidence that more and more they will +be the unconquerable bulwark of Freedom, Justice, +Civilization and Right.</p> + +<p>After having so fully expressed my profound +conviction of what I consider to be my sacred duty +as a loyal British subject, I feel sure I will be allowed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[23]</a></span> +to ask my English-speaking countrymen not +to judge my French compatriots by the sayings +and deeds of persons, too well gifted and too prone +to injure their future and that of the whole country +itself, but utterly disqualified and impotent to do +them any good.</p> + +<p>Need I affirm that my French Canadian compatriots +are loyal at heart, a liberty loving and +peaceful people, law-abiding citizens, fairly minded, +intelligent, hard working, industrious. They +have done, they are doing, and will do, their fair +share for the progress and the future greatness of +our wide and mighty Dominion. To all those who +desire to appreciate their course in all fairness +and Christian Justice, I will say: do not fail to +take into account that like all other national +groups they are liable, in overtrying circumstances, +to be in a certain measure wrongly influenced +by deficiencies of leadership, but depend +that they cannot be, for any length of time, carried +away by unscrupulous players on their feelings. +Some of them were deceived by persistent efforts +to persuade them that England was, as much as +Germany, guilty of having precipitated the great +war which has been the curse of almost the whole +world for the last four years. The accumulated +remembrance of their staunch loyalty and patriotism<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[24]</a></span> +during more than a century and a half will do +much to favour the harmonious relations of all +Canadians of good will who, I have no doubt, comprise +millions of well wishers of the glorious +destiny of our country.</p> + +<p>May I be allowed to conclude by saying that +my most earnest desire is to do all in my power, +in the rank and file of the great army of free men, +to reach the goal which ought to be the most persevering +and patriotic ambition of loyal Canadians +of all origins and creeds.</p> + +<p>And I repeat, wishing my words to be re-echoed +throughout the length and breadth of the +land I so heartily cherish:—I have always been, +I am and will ever be, to my last breath, true to my +oath of allegiance to my Sovereign and to my +country.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[25]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER I.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Who Are The Guilty Parties?</span></h3> + + +<p>Any one sincerely wishing to arrive at a sound +opinion on the great war raging for the last four +years, must necessarily make a serious study of +the causes which led to the terrific struggle so +horribly straining the energies of the civilized +world to escape tyrannical domination. The case +having been so fully discussed, and the responsibilities +of the assailant belligerents so completely +proved, I surely need not show at length that the +German Emperor, his military party, the group of +the German population called <span class="smcap">Junkers</span>, are to the +highest degree, the guilty parties of all the woful +wrongs imposed upon Mankind and of the bloodshed +unprecedented in all the ages.</p> + +<p>The German Empire had for many years decided +that it would not alone attempt to dominate +the world. It wanted a partner to share the +responsibility of the crime it was ready to commit +at the first favourable opportunity, but a docile +partner which she could direct at will, command +with imperious orders, and crush without mercy +at the first move of resistance. That plying tool +was found in the complicity of Austria-Hungary, +for years under the sway of Berlin diplomacy.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[26]</a></span></p> + +<p>No sane man, if he is sincere, if he is honest, +can now, for a single moment, hesitate to proclaim +that between Germany and Austria-Hungary, and +the group of nations henceforth bearing the glorious +name of <span class="smcap">The Allies</span>, Right and Justice are on +the side of England, of France, of the United +States, of Belgium, of Italy, of Canada.</p> + +<p>Where is the man with a sound mind, with a +strong heart, beating with the noble impulses of +righteousness, with a soul dignified by lofty aspirations, +who ignores to-day that for fifty years +previous to the declaration of war, in August 1914, +Germany had been perfecting her military organization +for a grand effort at universal domination?</p> + +<p>All my life a close student of History, I was +much impressed by the constant Policy of England +to maintain Peace during the last century. When +the World emerged from the great wars of the +Napoleonic Era, she firmly took her stand in favour +of peaceful relations between the nations, trusting +more and more for the future prosperity of them +all to the advantages to be derived from the permanency +of friendly intercourse, from the ever +increasing development of international trade, +prompted by the freest possible exchanges of the +products of all the countries blessed by Providence +with large and varied resources. Her statesmen, +so many of them truly worthy of this name, however +divided they may have been with regard to +questions of domestic government and internal reforms, +were most united about the course to be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[27]</a></span> +followed respecting foreign relations. Perhaps +more than all others having a say in the management +of the world's affairs at large, they fully +realized that no nation could prosper and successfully +work out her destinies by systematically +trying to injure her neighbours. No independent +country can become wealthier, happier, and greater, +by spreading ruin and devastation around her +frontiers.</p> + +<p>The most convincing evidence that England +was constantly favourable to the maintenance of +peace amongst the great Powers of the World, for +the last hundred years, is found in her permanent +determination not to be drawn into the vortex of +European continental militarism, so powerfully +developed by Prussianism. She could have organized +a standing army of millions of men. She +would not. True, during the few years which preceded +the present hurricane, some of the most eminent +of England's military officers, notably, foremost +amongst them, Lord Roberts, seeing, with +their eyes wide open, the aggravated dangers accumulating +on the darkening horizon, warned +their countrymen about the threatening waves +which menaced the future of the world. But +British public opinion, as a whole, would not +depart from her almost traditional policy of +"<i>non-intervention</i>". For nearly a century, Great +Britain maintained her "<i>splendid isolation</i>", trusting +to the sound sense which should always govern +the world to protect Mankind against the horrors<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[28]</a></span> +of a general war. Never was this great national +policy better exemplified than during the long and +glorious reign of Her Majesty Queen Victoria. +For more than fifty years, she graced one of the +most illustrious Thrones that ever presided over +the destinies of a great Empire, with sovereign +dignity, with womanly virtues, with motherly devotion, +with patriotic respect of the constitutional +liberties of her free subjects. When she departed +for a better world, she was succeeded by the great +King and Emperor—Edward VII.—who, during +the few years of his memorable reign, proved himself +so much the friendly supporter of harmony +and good will amongst the nations that he deserved +to be called "<span class="smcap">The King of the Peace of +the World</span>."</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[29]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER II.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Persistent Efforts of England in Favour of +Peace.</span></h3> + + +<p>In 1891, Lord Salisbury, then Prime Minister +of England, witnessing the constant progress of +Prussian militarism on land and sea, and fully +conscious of the misfortunes it was preparing for +Humanity, ordered an official statement to be +made of the extravagant cost of the European +military organization, and sent it confidentially to +the German Kaiser, who took no notice of it.</p> + +<p>In 1896, Lord Salisbury lays before the Czar +of Russia all the information he has obtained on +the question of militarism in Europe. On the +28th of August, 1898, the Emperor of Russia addressed +to the world his celebrated Manifesto in +favour of peace. It urged, first, the necessity of a +truly permanent peace; second, the limitation of +military preparation which, in its ever increasing +development, was causing the economic ruin of the +nations.</p> + +<p>The conferences of The Hague in favour of an +international agreement for the maintenance of +peace were the direct result of the initiative of the +British Prime Minister, who foresaw the frightful +consequences for Humanity of the enormous development +of militarism by the German Empire.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[30]</a></span></p> + +<p>All the great Powers of Europe and America, +together with the secondary states, at once heartily +concurred with the proposition of the Czar of +Russia. Unfortunately, there were two sad exceptions +to the consent to consider the salutary purpose +so anxiously desired by those who valued as +they should all the benefits the world would have +derived from an international system assuring +permanent peace. Germany and Austria, the latter +already for years dominated by the former, +opposed the patriotic move of the Emperor of +Russia, suggested to him by Great Britain. They +agreed to be represented at the Conferences for the +only object of thwarting the efforts in favour of a +satisfactory enactment of new rules of International +Law to henceforth protect the world +against a general conflagration, and to free the +nations from the crushing burdens of a militarism +daily developing more extravagant.</p> + +<p>Ministerial changes in Great Britain in no +way altered this part of the foreign policy of the +Mother Country. In 1905, Mr. Campbell-Bannerman +became Prime Minister of England. He was +well known to be an ardent pacifist. Deprecating +the mad increase of unchecked militarism, he said, +in his ministerial program:—</p> + +<p>"<i>A policy of huge armaments keeps alive and +stimulates and feeds the belief that force is the +best, if not the only, solution of international +differences.</i>"</p> + +<p>On the 8th of March, 1906, Lord Haldane, then<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[31]</a></span> +Minister of War, declared in the British House of +Commons:—</p> + +<p>"<i>I wish we were near the time when the +nations would consider together the reduction of +armaments.... Only by united action can we +get rid of the burden which is pressing so heavily +on all civilized nations.</i>"</p> + +<p>The second Conference of The Hague which +took place in July and October, 1907, was then +being organized. Russia was again its official promoter. +Well aware of the uncompromising stand of +Germany on the question of reduced armaments, +she had not included that matter in the program +she had decided to lay before the Conference. The +British Government did all they could to have it +placed on the orders to be taken into consideration. +A member of the Labor Party, Mr. Vivian, moved +in the House of Commons, that the Conference of +The Hague be called upon to discuss that most important +subject. His motion was unanimously and +enthusiastically carried.</p> + +<p>Informing the House that the Cabinet heartily +approved the Resolution, Sir Edward Grey, Secretary +for Foreign Affairs, said:—</p> + +<p>"<i>I do not believe that at any time has the +conscious public opinion in the various countries +of Europe set more strongly in the direction of +peace than at the present time, and yet the burden +of military and naval expenditure goes on increasing. +No greater service could it (the Hague Conference) +do, than to make the conditions of peace<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[32]</a></span> +less expensive than they are at the present time.... +It is said we are waiting upon foreign nations +in order to reduce our expenditure. As a matter +of fact, we are all waiting on each other. Some +day or other somebody must take the first step.... +I do, on behalf of the Government, not only accept, +but welcome such a resolution as this as a wholesome +and beneficial expression of opinion.</i>"</p> + +<p>In July, 1906, a most important meeting of +the Inter-Parliamentary Union took place in London. +Twenty-three countries, enjoying the privileges, +in various proportions, of free institutions, +were represented at this memorable Congress of +Nations. In the course of his remarkable opening +speech of the first sitting, Mr. Campbell-Bannerman, +Prime Minister, said:—</p> + +<p>"<i>Urge your Governments, in the name of humanity, +to go into The Hague Conference as we +ourselves hope to go, pledged to diminished charges +in respect of armaments.</i>"</p> + +<p>A motion embodying the views so earnestly +pressed by the British Government was unanimously +carried.</p> + +<p>On the fifth of March, 1907, only four months +before the opening of the Second Hague Conference, +Mr. Campbell-Bannerman, affirming the +bounden duty of England to propose the restriction +of armaments, said, in the British House of +Commons:—</p> + +<p>"<i>Holding the opinion that there is a great +movement of feeling among thinking people in all<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[33]</a></span> +the nations of the world, in favor of some restraint +on the enormous expenditure involved in the present system +so long as it exists.... We have desired +and still desire to place ourselves in the very +front rank of those who think that the warlike +attitude of powers, as displayed by the excessive +growth of armaments is a curse to Europe, and the +sooner it is checked, in however moderate a degree, +the better.</i>"</p> + +<p>Unfortunately, German hostility to reduced +armaments prevented any good result from the +second Hague Conference in the way of checking +extravagant and ruinous military organization. +There was sad disappointment in all the reasonable +world and specially in England at this deplorable +outcome. Mr. Campbell-Bannerman expressed +it as follows:—</p> + +<p>"<i>We had hoped that some great advance might +be made towards a common consent to arrest the +wasteful and growing competition in naval and +military armaments. We were disappointed.</i>"</p> + +<p>Unshaken in her determination to do her utmost +to protect Civilization against the threatening +and ever increasing dangers of German militarism, +England persisted with the most laudable +perseverance in her noble efforts to that much desired +end. But all her pleadings, however convincing, +were vain. Germany was obdurate. +Finally, on the 30th of March, 1911, speaking in +the Reichstag, the German Imperial Chancellor +threw off the mask, and positively declared that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[34]</a></span> +the question of reduced armaments admitted of no +possible solution "<i>as long as men were men and +States were States</i>."</p> + +<p>A more brutal declaration could hardly have +been made. It was a cynical challenge to the +World. Times were maturing and Germany was +anxiously waiting for the opportunity to strike the +blow which would stagger Humanity.</p> + +<p>Through all the great crisis of July and August, +1914, directly consequent upon the odious +crime of Sarajevo, England exhausted all her efforts +to maintain peace, but unfortunately without +avail.</p> + +<p>Knowing very well how much England sincerely +wished the maintenance of peace, the German +Government was to the last moment under +the delusion that it could succeed in having Great +Britain to remain neutral in a general European +war. They were not ashamed to presume they +could bribe England. Without blushing they made +to the British Government the infamous proposition +contained in the following despatch from Sir +E. Goschen, the British Ambassador at Berlin, +to Sir Edward Grey, the Secretary of State for +Foreign Affairs:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> +<div class="center">Sir E. Goschen to Sir Edward Grey (Received July 29).</div> + +<div class="right">Berlin, July 29, 1914.</div> + +<p> +(Telegraphic.)<br /> +</p> + +<p>I was asked to call upon the Chancellor to-night. His +Excellency had just returned from Potsdam.</p> + +<p>He said that should Austria be attacked by Russia a European +conflagration might, he feared, become inevitable, owing to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[35]</a></span> +Germany's obligation as Austria's ally, in spite of his continued +efforts to maintain peace. He then proceeded to make the following +strong bid for British neutrality. He said that it was clear, so +far as he was able to judge the main principle which governed +British policy, that Great Britain would never stand by and allow +France to be crushed in any conflict there might be. That, however, +was not the object at which Germany aimed. Provided that neutrality +of Great Britain was certain, every assurance would be +given to the British Government that the Imperial Government +aimed at no territorial acquisitions at the expense of France should +they prove victorious in any war that might ensue.</p> + +<p>I questioned his Excellency about the French colonies, and +he said he was unable to give a similar undertaking in that respect. +As regards Holland, however, his Excellency said that, so +long as Germany's adversaries respected the integrity and neutrality +of the Netherlands, Germany was ready to give His +Majesty's Government an assurance that she would do likewise. +It depended upon the action of France what operations Germany +might be forced to enter upon in Belgium, but when the war was +over, Belgian integrity would be respected if she had not sided +against Germany.</p> + +<p>His Excellency ended by saying that ever since he had +been Chancellor the object of his policy had been, as you were +aware, to bring about an understanding with England; he trusted +that these assurances might form the basis of that understanding +which he so much desired. He had in mind a general neutrality +agreement between England and Germany, though it was of +course at the present moment too early to discuss details, and an +assurance of British neutrality in the conflict which present crisis +might possibly produce, would enable him to look forward to +realisation of his desire.</p> + +<p>In reply to his Excellency's inquiry how I thought his request +would appeal to you, I said that I did not think it probable +that at this stage of events you would care to bind yourself to any +course of action and that I was of opinion that you would desire +to retain full liberty.</p> + +<p>Our conversation upon this subject having come to an end, +I communicated the contents of your telegram of to-day to his +Excellency, who expressed his best thanks to you.</p></div> + +<p>To the foregoing outrageous proposition, the +Government of Great Britain gave the proud and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[36]</a></span> +noble reply which follows, for all times to be recorded +in diplomatic annals to the eternal honour +and glory of the Ministers who incurred the responsibility +of, and of the distinguished diplomat +who drafted, that memorable document:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"> + +<div class="center">Sir Edward Grey to Sir E. Goschen.</div> + +<p>(Telegraphic.)</p> + +<div class="right">Foreign Office, July 30, 1914.</div> + +<p>Your telegram of 29th July.</p> + +<p>His Majesty's Government cannot for a moment entertain +the Chancellor's proposal that they should bind themselves to +neutrality on such terms.</p> + +<p>What he asks us in effect is to engage to stand by while +French colonies are taken and France is beaten so long as Germany +does not take French territory as distinct from the colonies.</p> + +<p>From the material point of view such a proposal is unacceptable, +for France, without further territory in Europe being +taken from her, could be so crushed as to lose her position as a +Great Power, and become subordinate to German policy.</p> + +<p>Altogether, apart from that, it would be a disgrace for us +to make this bargain with Germany at the expense of France, a +disgrace from which the good name of this country would never +recover.</p> + +<p>The Chancellor also in effect asks us to bargain away whatever +obligation or interest we have as regards the neutrality of +Belgium. We could not entertain that bargain either.</p> + +<p>Having said so much, it is unnecessary to examine whether +the prospect of a future general neutrality agreement between +England and Germany offered positive advantages sufficient to +compensate us for tying our hands now. We must preserve our +full freedom to act as circumstances may seem to us to require in +any such unfavourable and regrettable development of the present +crisis as the Chancellor contemplates.</p> + +<p>You should speak to the Chancellor in the above sense, and +add most earnestly that the only way of maintaining the good relations +between England and Germany is that they should continue +to work together to preserve the peace of Europe; if we succeed in +this object, the mutual relations of Germany and England will, I +believe, be <b>ipso facto</b> improved and strengthened. For that object +His Majesty's Government will work in that way with all sincerity +and good-will.</p></div><p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[37]</a></span></p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>And I will say this: if the peace of Europe can be preserved, +and the present crisis safely passed, my own endeavour will be to +promote some arrangement to which Germany will be a party, +by which she could be assured that no aggressive or hostile policy +would be pursued against her or her allies by France, Russia, and +ourselves, jointly or separately. I have desired this and worked +for it, as far as I could, through the last Balkan crisis, and, Germany +having a corresponding object, our relations sensibly improved. +The idea has hitherto been too Utopian to form the subject +of definite proposals, but if this present crisis, so much more +acute than any that Europe has gone through for generations, be +safely passed, I am hopeful that the relief and reaction which will +follow may make possible some more definite rapprochement between +the Powers than has been possible hitherto.</p></div> + +<p>The British Government could not take a more +dignified stand and express their indignation at the +infamous proposal in stronger and more noble +terms.</p> + +<p>Let us now read the indignant protest of Mr. +Asquith, the British Prime Minister, against the +outrageous German proposition, addressed to the +House of Commons, where it raised a storm of applause, +proclaiming to the World the dogged determination +of England to wage war rather than +agree to the dishonourable German proposal:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>What does that amount to? Let me just ask the House. +I do so, not with the object of inflaming passion, certainly not +with the object of exciting feeling against Germany, but I do so to +vindicate and make clear the position of the British Government +in this matter. What did that proposal amount to? In the first +place, it meant this: That behind the back of France—they were +not made a party to these communications—we should have given, +if we had assented to that, a free license to Germany to annex, in +the event of a successful war, the whole of the extra European +dominions and possessions of France. What did it mean as regards +Belgium? When she addressed, as she has addressed in +the last few days, her moving appeal to us to fulfil our solemn +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[38]</a></span>guarantee of her neutrality, what reply should we have given? +What reply should we have given to that Belgian appeal? We +should have been obliged to say that without her knowledge we +had bartered away to the Power threatening her our obligation +to keep our plighted word. The House has read, and the country +has read, of course, in the last few hours, the most pathetic appeal +addressed by the King of Belgium, and I do not envy the man +who can read that appeal with an unmoved heart. Belgians are +fighting and losing their lives. What would have been the position +of Great Britain to-day in the face of that spectacle if we had +assented to this infamous proposal? Yes, and what are we to get +in return for the betrayal of our friends and the dishonour of our +obligations? What are we to get in return? A promise—nothing +more; a promise as to what Germany would do in certain eventualities; +a promise, be it observed—I am sorry to say it, but it must +be put upon record—given by a Power which was at that very +moment announcing its intention to violate its own treaty, and +inviting us to do the same. I can only say, if we had dallied or +temporized, we, as a Government, should have covered ourselves +with dishonour, and we should have betrayed the interests of this +country, of which we are trustees.</p></div> + +<p>After quoting and eulogizing the telegraphic +despatch of Sir Edward Grey to Sir E. Goschen, +dated July 30, 1914, Mr. Asquith proceeded as +follows:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>That document, in my opinion, states clearly, in temperate +and convincing language, the attitude of this Government. Can +any one who reads it fail to appreciate the tone of obvious sincerity +and earnestness which underlies it; can any one honestly doubt +that the Government of this country in spite of great provocation—and +I regard the proposals made to us as proposals which we +might have thrown aside without consideration and almost without +answer—can any one doubt that in spite of great provocation the +right hon. gentleman, who had already earned the title—and no +one ever more deserved it—of Peace Maker of Europe, persisted +to the very last moment of the last hour in that beneficent but +unhappily frustrated purpose. I am entitled to say, and I do so +on behalf of this country—I speak not for a party, I speak for the +country as a whole—that we made every effort any Government +could possibly make for peace. But this war has been forced upon +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[39]</a></span>us. What is it we are fighting for? Every one knows, and no one +knows better than the Government the terrible incalculable suffering, +economic, social, personal and political, which war, and especially +a war between the Great Powers of the world must entail. +There is no man amongst us sitting upon this bench in these trying +days—more trying perhaps than any body of statesmen for a +hundred years have had to pass through, there is not a man +amongst us who has not, during the whole of that time, had clearly +before his vision the almost unequalled suffering which war, even +in just cause, must bring about, not only to the peoples who are +for the moment living in this country and in the other countries +of the world, but to posterity and to the whole prospects of +European civilization. Every step we took with that vision before +our eyes, and with a sense of responsibility which it is impossible +to describe. Unhappily, if in spite of all our efforts to keep the +peace, and with that full and overpowering consciousness of the +result, if the issue be decided in favour of war, we have, nevertheless, +thought it to be the duty as well as the interest of this country +to go to war, the House may be well assured it was because we +believe, and I am certain the Country will believe, we are unsheathing +our sword in a just cause.</p> + +<p>If I am asked what we are fighting for I reply in two +sentences. In the first place to fulfil a solemn international obligation, +an obligation which, if it had been entered into between +private persons in the ordinary concerns of life, would have been +regarded as an obligation not only of law but of honour, which no +self-respecting man could possibly have repudiated. I say, secondly, +we are fighting to vindicate the principle which, in these days +when force, material force, sometimes seems to be the dominant +influence and factor in the development of mankind, we are fighting +to vindicate the principle that small nationalities are not to be +crushed, in defiance of international good faith, by the military +will of a strong and overmastering Power. I do not believe any +nation ever entered into a great controversy—and this is one of the +greatest history will ever know—with a clearer conscience and +stronger conviction that it is fighting, not for aggression, not for +the maintenance even of its own selfish interest, but that it is fighting +in defence of principles, the maintenance of which is vital to +the civilisation of the world. With a full conviction, not only of +the wisdom and justice, but of the obligations which lay upon us +to challenge this great issue, we are entering into the struggle.</p></div><p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[40]</a></span></p> + +<p>The German Government refusing to order +their army to retire from the Belgian territory it +had violated, at midnight, 4th to 5th August, 1914, +the whole British Empire was at war with the +whole German Empire.</p> + +<p>Surely, there is not the slightest necessity to +argue any more that in the terrific war raging for +the last four years, Justice and Right are on the +side of England and her Allies. No war was +ever more just, waged with equal honour for the +triumph of Liberty and Civilization, for the protection +of Humanity against the onslaught of +barbarism developed to the cruelty of the darkest +ages of History.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[41]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER III.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Call To Duty In Canada.</span></h3> + + +<p>Every one knows how the news of the State of +War between the British and German Empires +were received in our great Canadian Dominion, +after the days of anxious waiting which culminated +in the rallying of England to the defence of the +cause of Freedom and Civilization. When the +call for duty was sounded in the Capital of the +British Empire, it rolled over the mighty Atlantic, +spreading over the length and breadth of Canada, +being re-echoed with force in our Province of +Quebec.</p> + +<p>At once called to prepare for the emergency, +the Canadian Parliament met and unanimously +decided that the Dominion would, of her own free +will and patriotic decision, participate in the +Great War. The course of events in Canada, for +the last four years, is well known by all. It is +recent history.</p> + +<p>My special object in condensing in this book +the defence which I considered it my duty to make +of the just and sacred cause of the British Empire, +and her Allies, in the great war still raging with +undiminished fury, being to show how I did, to the +best of my ability, try to persuade my French<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[42]</a></span> +Canadian Countrymen where was the true path of +duty, and how false and disloyal were the unscrupulous +theories of "Nationalism", I must first review +the successive movements of public opinion +in the Province of Quebec.</p> + +<p>In the preceding sentence, I have intently affirmed +that the cause of the Allies was that of the +whole British Empire. Surely, it should not be +necessary to say so, as no truly loyal British subject +would for a moment hesitate to come to that +patriotic conclusion. Still, however incredible it +is, the duty of the British colonies to rally to the +flag to defend the Empire and participate in the +deadly struggle between Civilization and barbarism, +was challenged by the leaders of the "Nationalist +school" in the Province of Quebec. Of course, +that school never represented more than a small +minority of thought and numbers. But, sad to admit, +a fanatical minority, in days of trying sacrifices, +can do a great deal of injury to a people by +inflaming national and religious prejudices. We, +French Canadians, have had much to suffer from +the unpatriotic efforts of a few to bring our countrymen +to take an erroneous view of the situation.</p> + +<p>At the opening of the war, the general +opinion in the Province of Quebec was without +doubt strongly in favor of Canada's participation +in the struggle. Any student of the working of our +constitutional system knows how the strength of +public opinion is ascertained, outside of a general +election, in all cases, and more specially with regard<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[43]</a></span> +to measures of paramount importance when +the country has to deal with a national emergency.</p> + +<p>The Parliament of Canada is the authorized +representative of the Country. Called in a special +session, at the very outbreak of the hostilities, they +voted unanimously that it was our duty to participate +in the war. All the representatives of the +Province of Quebec heartily joined with those of +all the other Provinces to vote this unanimous +decision.</p> + +<p>In the light of events ever since, who can +now reasonably pretend that the patriotic decision +of the Parliament of Canada was not entirely, +even enthusiastically, approved by the Canadian +people? The press, even in the Province of Quebec, +with only one exception of any consequence, was +unanimous in its approval of the action of +Parliament.</p> + +<p>The heads of our Church, the Archbishops and +Bishops of the Ecclesiastical Provinces of Quebec, +Montreal and Ottawa, in their very important +Pastoral Letter on the duties of the Catholics in +the present war, positively said:—</p> + +<p>"<i>We must acknowledge it—(nous ne saurions +nous le dissimuler—): that conflict, one of the +most terrific the world has yet seen, cannot but +have its repercussion in our country. England is +engaged into it, and who does not see that the fate +of all the component parts of the Empire is bound +with the fate of her arms. She relies upon our support, +and that support, we are happy to say, has<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[44]</a></span> +been generously offered to her both in men and +money.</i>"</p> + +<p>No representative of public opinion, of any +weight, outside of Parliament, professional men, +leaders of finance, commerce and industry, in the +Province of Quebec, raised a word of disapproval +at the Parliamentary call to arms.</p> + +<p>Not one meeting was called, not one resolution +was moved, to oppose the decision of the +Canadian Parliament.</p> + +<p>Not one petition was addressed to the two +Houses in Ottawa against Canada's participation +in the war.</p> + +<p>Every one in the Province of Quebec knew +that participating in the war would entail heavy +financial sacrifices, and that the taxation of the +country would have to be largely increased to +meet the new obligations we had freely decided to +incur for the salvation of the Empire and of +Civilization.</p> + +<p>The Government of the day proposed the +financial measures they considered necessary to +raise the public revenue which the circumstances +required. Those measures were unanimously +approved by Parliament. The taxpayers of the +country, those of the Province of Quebec like all +the others, willingly and patriotically accepted +and paid without complaint the new taxes into the +public treasury. During more than the three first +years of the war, I visited a good part of the Province +of Quebec, and addressed several large public<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[45]</a></span> +meetings. Everywhere my attention was forcibly +struck by the prompt willingness of my French +Canadian countrymen to bear their share of the +financial sacrifices Canada was called upon to +make for the triumph of the cause of the Allies.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[46]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER IV.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Recruiting By Voluntary Service.</span></h3> + + +<p>No stronger evidence could be given of the determination +of the country as a whole, and over +all its component parts, to support Great Britain +and her Allies to final success, than the truly wonderful +record of the voluntary enlistment of more +than four hundred thousand men, of all walks in +life, to rush to the front.</p> + +<p>Recruiting in the Province of Quebec indeed +started very well. Several thousands of French +Canadian youth rallied to the colors. I hope and +trust that, sooner or later, it will be possible to +make a more satisfactory statistical record of the +number of French Canadians who enlisted. I am +fully convinced that the total is somewhat much +larger than the figures usually quoted. It would +surely be conducive to a better understanding of +the case, if such statistical information was carefully +prepared and made public. It is easily conceivable +that the pressure of the work of maintaining +the splendid Canadian army renders it perhaps +difficult to attend actually to the details of +that compilation. So we can afford to wait for the +redress of figures which may constitute a wrong to +the race second in numbers but equal to any in +patriotism in Canada.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[47]</a></span></p> + +<p>Pending my remarks upon certain causes +which have contributed to check recruiting +amongst the French element in the Province of +Quebec, I consider it important to mention those +which were easy to ascertain and comprehend.</p> + +<p>It is a well known fact that early marriages +are a rule in the Province of Quebec much more +than in the other Provinces of the Dominion. As +a natural consequence, the available number of +young unmarried men for recruiting purposes was +proportionately less. I myself have known parishes +in our Province where half a dozen of unmarried +young men from twenty years of age and +upwards could not be found.</p> + +<p>It was easily to foresee that a comparison +would be made between the number of Canadian-born +volunteers in the English-speaking Provinces +and that from the Province of Quebec. The degree +of enthusiasm for enlistment in the other +Provinces between the foreign born and the Canadian +born has also been noticed. It has generally +been admitted that most naturally the young men +recently arrived in Canada were more strongly appealed +to by all the sacred ties still binding them +to their mother land. When generations have, for +more than a century, enjoyed all the blessings of +peace and lived far away from the turmoil of warlike +preparations and military conflicts, is it to be +much wondered at that the entire population is not +at once permeated with the feeling of the dangers +ahead, and do not rise rapidly to the full sense of +the duty she is suddenly called upon to perform.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[48]</a></span></p> + +<p>My daily personal intercourse with hundreds +of my French Canadian compatriots allowed me to +realize that many of them, even amongst the leading +classes, were over-confident that the Allies representing +at the beginning the united effort of +England, France and Russia, soon to be reinforced +by Italy, breaking away from the Central Powers, +would certainly be equal to the task of being victorious +over German militarism. Repeatedly, before +public meetings and in very numerous private +conversations, I urgently implored my hearers not +to be so deluded, doing my best to convince them +that it would be a fatal error to shut our eyes from +the truth, that the military power of Central +Europe, comprising the two great Empires of +Germany and Austria, Bulgaria, with the help of +Asiatic Turkey, and the undisguised support of +baneful teutonic influences and intrigues at the +courts of Petrograd and Athens, was gigantic, and +that the terrible conflict would surely develop into +a struggle for life and death between human freedom +and barbarism.</p> + +<p>This feeling of over-confidence was passing +away, when it became evident that to triumph over +the modern huns and their associates was no easy +task; that the goal of freeing humanity from the +threatening universal domination would require +the most determined effort of the nations who had +heroically undertaken to reach it.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[49]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER V.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Intervention of Nationalism.</span></h3> + + +<p>The great struggle being waged with increased +intensity, it was daily becoming more and more +evident that the Allied nations were bound to +muster all their courage, perseverance and resources +to successfully fight their determined foe. +It was just at the thick of this critical situation, +calling forth the devotion and patriotism of all, +that the "Nationalist" campaign of false theories +and principles was launched with renewed activity +in the Province of Quebec.</p> + +<p>Mr. Henri Bourassa, ex-member of Labelle in +the House of Commons, was, and still is, the recognized +leader of the "Nationalist School" in our +Province, and wherever it finds adherents. His +personal organ, "<i>Le Devoir</i>," is daily expounding +the doctrines of that School.</p> + +<p>In October, 1915, Mr. Bourassa issued a pamphlet +of over four hundred pages entitled:—"<i>What +do we owe England?</i>"—in French:—"<i>Que +devons-nous à l'Angleterre?</i>"</p> + +<p>In the long overdrawn and farfetched argumentation +of this volume, the author's effort is to +try and prove that Canada owes nothing to England, +that all those who favour the Canadian participation<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[50]</a></span> +in the war are "revolutionists," that we +are unduly paying a large tribute to the Empire.</p> + +<p>In 1916, Mr. Bourassa supplemented his first +book with a second pamphlet, entitled:—"<i>Yesterday, +To-day, To-morrow</i>," in French:—"<i>Hier, Aujourd'hui, +Demain</i>," in which he amplified the +views expressed in the preceding volume.</p> + +<p>I undertook to read Mr. Bourassa's works, +and I must say that I was astonished at what I +found therein. I felt very strongly that his erroneous +views—without questioning their sincerity—were +bound to pervert the opinion of my +French compatriots, to enflame their prejudices, +and to do a great deal of harm in promoting the +ever dangerous conflict of race fanaticism. Over +forty years of experience of public life had taught +me how easy it is to introduce a prejudice in a +man's mind, but how difficult it is to destroy it +when once it has taken root.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[51]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER VI.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">What Do We Owe England?</span></h3> + + +<p>To this question raised by Mr. Bourassa, and +argued at length by himself in the negative, I +answered by a chapter of my book:—"<i>L'Angleterre, +le Canada et la Grand Guerre</i>"—"<i>England, +Canada and the Great War</i>."</p> + +<p>Great Britain, ever since she came to the conclusion +that the days of the old colonial policy +were passed, and agreed that we should freely +govern ourselves, with ministerial responsibility, +within the powers set forth in our constitutional +charter, has scrupulously respected our political +liberty. We have administered our own affairs at +our own free will. The Imperial Government +never attempted to interfere with the development +of our federal politics. They would surely have declined +such interference, if it had been asked for.</p> + +<p>As long as we form part of the British Empire, +it is evident that we owe to England that +loyalty which every colony owes to her mother-country. +Granted by the Sovereign Power ruling +Canada the freest institutions, having the best of +reasons to be fully satisfied with our relations +with Great Britain, we are in duty bound to be +loyal to her flag. We must be true to our allegiance.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[52]</a></span></p> + +<p>We have freely decided to incur the sacrifices +we are making for the war. We have so decided +because we considered it of the greatest importance, +for the future of Humanity, that the German +ambition for universal domination be foiled; that +the British Empire be maintained; that France +should continue a first class Power, as expressed +by Mr. Asquith; that before all, and above all, the +eternal principles of Right, Justice and Civilization, +shall not be trampled upon by the terrific assault +of teutonic barbarism. Moreover, we are +also in duty bound to judge with fairness England's +part in the great society of nations, and, +especially, that she plays in the great events of the +present crisis. Beyond doubt, a truly loyal Canadian +must refrain from poisoning foreign opinion +and that of his fellow British subjects against +Great Britain in attributing her course to selfish +interests, wilfully taking no account of her broad +and admirable foreign policy, ever inspired by the +steady desire to maintain peace.</p> + +<p>In the first mentioned work, Mr. Bourassa +lays great stress on the fact that for nearly a century +and a half, previous to the South African +War, Canada did not participate in the wars of +the Empire. He extensively quotes from the documents +and the discussions between Canada's representatives +and the Imperial Government, respecting +the defence of our country, and that of +the Empire herself. He concludes by pretending +that the result of all these negotiations and conventions<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[53]</a></span> +was the agreement that Canada would +have only to attend to her own defence, and that +Great Britain was always obliged to protect us +against all outside attacks. From these pretensions +he draws the startling conclusion that all +those who do not stand by the conventions he did +his best to emphasize are doing revolutionary +work.</p> + +<p>The answer to such extravagant notions is +rather plain and easy. There was not the slightest +necessity for the Nationalist leader to multiply +lengthy quotations to prove what mere common +sense settles at first thought:—</p> + +<p>First:—That any country, whether it be independent +or a colony, must defend itself when attacked +by an enemy.</p> + +<p>Second:—That a Sovereign State is bound to +defend all the territory under its authority and +covered by its flag.</p> + +<p>But all this has nothing whatever to do with +the very different question of Canada's participation, +outside her own territory, in a war in which +Great Britain is engaged, which participation +Canada has freely, deliberately approved and ordered. +Such was the case in 1914. The Parliament +and the people of Canada at once realized that +in the gigantic conflict into which Germany had +drawn all the Great Powers of Europe, our future +destiny as much as that of England herself was at +stake. Without the slightest hesitation, unasked +and unsolicited by the Mother Country, we decided<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[54]</a></span> +that we were in duty bound to do our share +to defend the great Empire of which we are a very +important component part, and to help saving the +world from tyrannical domination.</p> + +<p>Much too often giving to words a meaning +which they positively cannot convey, Mr. Bourassa +argued at length to prove that the agreements, +conventions, and understandings arrived at between +the Imperial and Canadian Governments, at +different dates, were a <i>solemn treaty</i>.</p> + +<p>How false and untenable such a pretention is, +surely needs no lengthy argument. International +Law knows no treaties but those made between +Sovereign States. It is most absurd to pretend +that a Sovereign State can make a treaty between +herself and its own colony. Where is the man with +the slightest notion of Constitutional Government +who would pretend, for instance, that the British +North American Act is a treaty between Great +Britain and Canada. It is an Act passed by the +Legislative authority of the Sovereign State to +which we belong, enacting the conditions under +which Canada would enjoy the rights and privileges +of constitutional self-government, participating +in the exercise of Sovereignty within the limits +of the powers enumerated in the Act creating the +Dominion. It was precisely because we knew we +were acting within the limits of those powers, that +we decided to join with England and her Allies in +the great war.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[55]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER VII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Canada Is Not A Sovereign State.</span></h3> + + +<p>As long as Canada will remain under the flag +of Great Britain—and for one I hope it will yet be +for many long years,—it is evident that it will not +be a "<i>Sovereign State</i>" in the full sense of the +word.</p> + +<p>One can hardly believe that the Nationalist +leader, at page 17 of his pamphlet—"<i>Hier, Aujourd'hui, +Demain</i>"—"<i>Yesterday, To-day, To-morrow</i>," +opens a chapter with the title: "<i>Les Colonies +autonomes sont des Etats Souverains.</i>"—"<i>The autonomous +colonies are Sovereign States.</i>"</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa was evidently led to the grievous +error contained in the preceding title by a complete +misapprehension of the true meaning of the +word "<i>autonomous</i>." He took "<i>autonomy</i>" for +"<i>Sovereignty</i>," being under the delusion that the +two are synonymous.</p> + +<p>Any student of History knows, or ought to +know, that after the war which culminated in the +independence of the United States, England adopted +an entirely new colonial policy. She was the +first Sovereign Power, and has ever since remained +the only one, to realize that the old system was +doomed to failure, that it was worn out. Her leading<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[56]</a></span> +statesmen, who always ranked amongst the +most eminent the world over, were more and more +convinced that the only safe colonial policy was +that which would grant "<i>self-government</i>" to the +colonies, trained to its harmonious working, for +their interior management. The true meaning of +this new policy was that several of the colonies +were, by acts of the Imperial Parliament, called to +the exercise of a share of the Sovereignty, well defined +in their respective constitutional charters. +Canada was one of the first British colonies to enjoy +the advantages of such a large part of the +Sovereign rights.</p> + +<p>Such "<i>autonomous colonies</i>" as Canada, Australia, +New Zealand, South Africa, Newfoundland, +have been, and are to the present day, do not transform +them into "<i>Sovereign States</i>," enjoying full +"Sovereign powers." They are not "<i>Independent +States</i>" in the full sense of the word.</p> + +<p>That Canada is not a Sovereign State is proved +beyond doubt by the very fact that she could not +amend or change her constitutional charter by her +own power and without a new Imperial law. If +the Nationalist leader's pretention was sound, any +member of the House of Commons, or of the Senate, +in Ottawa, could propose a bill to repeal the +British North America Act, 1867, and to replace it +by another constitutional charter. The very supposition +is absurd. Can it be imagined that His +Excellency the Governor-General could be advised +by his responsible Ministers to sanction, in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[57]</a></span> +name of His Majesty the Sovereign of Great +Britain, a bill repealing an Act of the Imperial +Parliament? Still it is exactly what Mr. Bourassa's +theory amounts to.</p> + +<p>Our constitutional charter does not only provide +what is called our Federal,—or National—autonomy, +but also the Provincial autonomy. The +powers of both are well defined in the Imperial +Act. The Provinces of the Dominion also exercise +that share of the Sovereign rights delegated to +them by the Imperial Parliament. Would the Nationalist +leader draw the extravagant conclusion +that the territory of any one of the Provinces cannot +be declared in the "State of War" with a Foreign +Power, by His Majesty the King, without the +assent of the Ministers of that Province? Still +that absurd proposition would not be more so than +that affirming the necessity of the assent of the +Canadian Cabinet, to a declaration of War involving +Canada in an Imperial struggle.</p> + +<p>The Sovereign right of declaring war to, and +of making peace with, another independent State, +is vested in the King of Great Britain, acting upon +the advice of his responsible Ministers in the +United Kingdom. To the Imperial Parliament +belongs the constitutional authority to deal with +the Imperial Foreign Affairs.</p> + +<p>It is plain that when Great Britain is at War +with another Sovereign State the whole territory +of the British Empire is in the "State of War" +with that Nation.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[58]</a></span></p> + +<p>It is inconceivable that Mr. Bourassa has +seriously pretended that Canada was not at war +with the German Empire the very moment the +British Empire was so in consequence of the +violation by Germany of Belgian neutrality. One +can hardly believe that he has propounded the +fallacious constitutional doctrine that His Majesty +"<i>the King of England hath not the right to declare +Canada in the State of War without the assent of +the Canadian Cabinet</i>."</p> + +<p>Where and when has the Nationalist leader +discovered that the Canadian Ministers have the +right to advise His Majesty upon all the questions +pertaining to the Imperial Foreign Affairs? Any +one conversant with the constitutional status of +Canada knows that the Canadian Ministers have +the right to advise the representative of the Sovereign +only upon matters as defined by the British +North America Act, 1867, and its amendments.</p> + +<p>I was indeed very much surprised at the attempt +of Mr. Bourassa to use the authority of Sir +Erskine May in support of his erroneous pretension +that the autonomous colonies of Great Britain +were Sovereign States.</p> + +<p>To all the students of the Constitutional History +of England, Sir Erskine May is a very well +known and appreciated writer. I have read his +works several times over for many years. I was +certain that he had never written anything to justify +the Nationalist leader in quoting him as he +did.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[59]</a></span></p> + +<p>Here follows the paragraph of May's Constitutional +History quoted by Mr. Bourassa in support +of his own views:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>Parliament has recently pronounced it to be just that the +Colonies which enjoy self-government, should undertake the responsibility +and cost of their own military defence. To carry this +policy into effect must be the work of time. But whenever it +may be effected, the last material bond of connection with the +Colonies will have been severed, and colonial states, acknowledging +the honorary sovereignty of England, and fully armed for self-defence, +as well against herself as others, will have grown out of +the dependencies of the British Empire.</p></div> + +<p>I must say that I am absolutely unable to detect +one single word in the above quotation to authorize +Mr. Bourassa to affirm that Sir Erskine +May was of opinion that "<i>the autonomous colonies +were Sovereign States</i>." The true meaning of the +above extract is surely very plain. What does it +say? It declares, what was a fact, that the British +<i>Parliament has recently pronounced it to be +just that the Colonies which enjoy self-government +should undertake the responsibility and cost of +their own military defence</i>.</p> + +<p>Would the British Parliament have deemed +it necessary to express such an opinion, if the Colonies +had, then, been Sovereign States, consequently +obliged, in duty bound, to defend themselves +<i>alone</i> against any possible enemy. Surely +not, for the obvious reason that Great Britain +would have had no more responsibility for the +defence of territories no longer covered by her flag +and under her Sovereignty.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[60]</a></span></p> + +<p>The very fact that the British Parliament +thought proper, <i>under the then circumstances</i>, to +say that the Colonies enjoying self-government +should undertake to defend themselves, is the convincing +proof that they were not Sovereign States.</p> + +<p>The following sentence of May's quotation +says:—<i>To carry this policy into effect must be the +work of time</i>.</p> + +<p>It is clear that the <i>policy</i> requiring the work +of time to be carried into effect was not actually +existent at the time Sir Erskine May was writing.</p> + +<p>The extract quoted by Mr. Bourassa concludes +by declaring that when such a policy <i>has</i> +been finally adopted, the Colonies will have developed +into Colonial States having <i>grown out of +the dependencies of the British Empire</i>.</p> + +<p>Evidently, when the Dominions of Canada, +Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, will have +grown out of the dependencies of the British Empire, +they will no longer be Colonies of Great +Britain. But when will that very important event +take place? Surely, Sir Erskine May could not +foresee. Even to-day Mr. Bourassa cannot say +more than any one else. Pending that unforeseen +outcome, the Dominions will remain parts of the +British Empire under her Sovereignty.</p> + +<p>The above quotation was taken by Mr. Bourassa +from the edition of Sir Erskine May's "Constitutional +History" published in 1912. But they +were first edited by the author in 1863. When has +the Imperial Parliament adopted the above mentioned<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[61]</a></span> +"<i>Resolution</i>"? It was voted in 1862—the +4th of March—more than fifty-six years ago. +Quoted as it has been by Mr. Bourassa, it appears +to have been only very recently adopted. The fact +that it is more than half a century old, and was +carried before the Federal Union of the Provinces, +is a convincing proof that it has no bearing whatever +upon the conditions of Canada's present +colonial status. By the aforesaid "<i>Resolution</i>," the +British House of Commons was only expressing the +opinion that the time had come for the Colonies to +undertake the responsibility and the cost of their +defence. The "Resolution" does not say that Great +Britain would no longer be called, in the exercise +of the rights and duties of her Sovereignty, to defend +her Colonial Empire.</p> + +<p>By what reasoning can a mere expression of +opinion by the English House of Commons be interpreted +as at once transforming the Colonies +into independent Sovereign States?</p> + +<p>Any one somewhat conversant with the political +events that led to the Federal Union of the +Provinces knows that in applying to the British +Parliament for the new Constitutional Charter, +the Legislature of United Canada had a twofold +object:—first, the settlement of the constitutional +difficulties then pending between Upper and +Lower Canada; secondly, a broader development +of Canada and also of the British Empire. Such +was the purpose of the coalition government formed +in 1864. All the members of that Cabinet were<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[62]</a></span> +strongly in favour of the maintenance of Canada's +union with Great Britain. I have heard them expounding +their views on what the future of Canada +ought to be. I am positive that neither Sir John +A. Macdonald, Sir Georges Cartier, the honorable +Georges Brown, nor any of their colleagues, of +both political parties, ever said a word which +could be construed as expressing the opinion that +the proposed Federal Union would make of +Canada an independent Sovereign State. It is +incredible that Mr. Bourassa should have so +erroneously understood their real views so as +to pretend that they favoured Confederation for +that very purpose.</p> + +<p>As a proof of his pretension, he quoted the +following words of Sir John A. Macdonald, in the +Legislative Assembly of old United Canada:—</p> + +<p>"<i>With us the Sovereign, or, in this country +the representative of the Sovereign, can act only +on the advice of His Ministers, those Ministers +being responsible to the people through Parliament.</i>"</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa used the foregoing sentence in +support of his contention that the King of England +could not declare war without the assent of the +Canadian Cabinet. It is impossible to understand +how such a notion can be seriously held and expressed. +His Majesty cannot ask nor accept such +an advice, if it was tendered, for the very reason +that the Canadian Cabinet has not the constitutional +right to advise the King respecting the international +relations of the Empire. And why?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[63]</a></span> +Precisely because the Canadian Ministers would +not be responsible for their advice to the Imperial +Parliament and to the electorate of the United +Kingdom.</p> + +<p>The true meaning of the above quoted sentence +of Sir John A. Macdonald is very plain. +Ministerial responsibility was the fundamental +principle of the old Constitution, as it is of the +Federal Charter. Sir John A. Macdonald was perfectly +right in affirming that "<i>in Canada, as in +England, the Sovereign could act only on the advice +of His Ministers," that is to say on the advice +of His responsible Ministers within the constitutional +powers of our Parliament on all matters +respecting which they had the constitutional right +to advise His Majesty</i>.</p> + +<p>Sir John A. Macdonald never said—he could +not possibly say—that as Prime Minister of +Canada, under the new Constitution, he would have +the right to advise the Sovereign on all matters +within the exclusive constitutional jurisdiction of +the Imperial Parliament, for instance respecting +the exercise of the Royal prerogative of declaring +war against, or of making peace with, a foreign +independent State. He has never propounded +such an utterly false constitutional doctrine.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa went still further. He quoted +the following sentence from Sir John A. Macdonald:—"<i>We +stand with regard to the people of +Canada precisely in the same position as the +House of Commons in England stands with regard +to the people of England</i>."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[64]</a></span></p> + +<p>I was indeed most astonished to read Mr. +Bourassa's inference from those words that Sir +John A. Macdonald <i>had affirmed the absolute +equality of powers of the Imperial and the Canadian +Parliaments</i>.</p> + +<p>If the opinion expressed by Sir John A. Macdonald +could be so interpreted, he would have affirmed—what +was radically wrong—that under +the new Constitution, the Canadian Parliament +would have, <i>concurrently with the Imperial Parliament</i>, +absolutely the same powers. What did +that mean? It meant that the Canadian Parliament, +just as the Imperial Parliament, would have +the right to edict laws establishing Home Rule in +Ireland, regulating the government of India and +the Crown Colonies, granting constitutional charters +for the good government of the Australian and +South African Dominions, &c., &c.</p> + +<p>Surely it is not necessary to argue at any +length to prove that Sir John A. Macdonald never +for a moment entertained such an opinion. What +he really said, in the above quoted words, was that +within their constitutional jurisdiction, within the +limits of their respective powers, the two Parliaments +stood in the same position, <i>respectively</i>, +with regard to the people of England and to the +people of Canada. It was equivalent to saying—what +was positively true—that the British +Ministers and the British Parliament were responsible +to the people of England, and that the +Canadian Ministers and the Canadian Parliament<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[65]</a></span> +were responsible to the people of Canada,—both +of them within the limits of their respective +constitutional powers.</p> + +<p>If the Canadian Legislature had enjoyed all +the constitutional powers of the British Parliament, +she would not have been obliged to pass addresses +asking the latter to enact a new charter +creating the Federal Union of the Provinces. She +could have repealed her then existing constitution +and enacted the new one by her own authority. +But that she could not do. She could not repeal the +old, nor enact the new charter.</p> + +<p>But the most extraordinary is that Mr. +Bourassa went so far as to declare that Canada +should have participated in the present war only +as a "<i>Nation</i>," meaning, of course, as an independent +Sovereign State.</p> + +<p>On reading such a preposterous proposition, +at once it strikes one's mind most forcibly that +if Canada had really had the power to intervene +in the world's struggle as a "Nation," she would +have had the equal right to the choice of three +alternatives.</p> + +<p>First:—Declare war against Germany and in +favor of the Allies.</p> + +<p>Second:—Remain neutral.</p> + +<p>Third:—Declare war against Great Britain +and fight for Germany.</p> + +<p>For it is obvious that all +the Sovereign States—and Canada like them all if +she had been one of them—had the Sovereign Right +to fight for or against Great Britain, or to remain<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[66]</a></span> +neutral. Of course, I am merely explaining in its +entirety the Right of a Sovereign State. I surely do +not mean to say that Canada, had she really been +such a State, would in any way have been justifiable +in joining with Germany in her dastardly +attempt to crush Civilization in the barbarous +throes of her domination.</p> + +<p>What would His Excellency the Governor-General +have answered his Prime Minister advising +him to declare war against England, he who +represents His Majesty at Ottawa? Would he not +have told him at once that the Canadian Prime +Minister had no right whatever to give him such +an advice; that Canada, being a British Colony, +could not declare war against her Sovereign State; +that for the Canadian people to take up arms +against England would be treasonable revolt?</p> + +<p>It is absolutely incredible that a public man, +aspiring to the leadership of his countrymen, can +have been so completely lost to the sense of the +Canadian constitutional situation as to boldly attempt +to pervert their mind with such fallacious +notions. He might as well pretend that the State +of New York, for instance, has the Sovereign Right +to declare war against the Government of the +United States.</p> + +<p>I, for one, cannot help wondering that any one +can seriously think that a colony, always pretending +to remain loyally so, can wage war against her +Sovereign State. I feel sure that all sensible men +do share my views on that point.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[67]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER VIII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">German Illusions.</span></h3> + + +<p>When Germany threw the gauntlet to the +Powers of the "Entente," she labored under the +delusion that the war would most surely break +down the British Empire. She was determined to +do her utmost to that end. But she utterly failed +in her criminal efforts.</p> + +<p>Strongly bound by ties of affection and constitutional +freedom, the great autonomous Dominions +and Colonies at once rallied with courage +and patriotism to the defence of the Empire, of +Justice, of Right and Civilization. India,—that +great Indian Empire—to the utter disappointment +of Germany, has stood admirably by Great +Britain ever since the outbreak of the War, by her +noble contributions of man-power and her munificent +generosity of very large sums of money, in +one instance amounting to $500,000,000.</p> + +<p>The Crown Colonies have also done their +share of duty with great devotion.</p> + +<p>The admirable result which for the last four +years has been shining bright and glorious all over +the world, is that, contrary to teutonic expectations, +the war, far from breaking asunder the +British Empire, has wonderfully solidified her +mighty edifice, by an intensity of loyalty to her +free institutions, to her glorious flag, which the +enjoyment of the blessings of peace would not have +proved so easily possible.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[68]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER IX.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Nationalist Error.</span></h3> + + +<p>The leaders of our Nationalist School have +for years strenuously laboured to pervert the mind +of our French-Canadian compatriots by the false +pretensions that we were, in some mysterious way, +coerced to participate in the European War. Even +previous to the days of the South African conflict, +they boldly took the stand that Canada should, on +no account, and under no circumstances whatever, +participate in what they called the Wars of the +Empire—<i>les guerres de l'Empire</i>. Canada, they +affirmed, had only to defend her own territory if +attacked.</p> + +<p>Fully appreciating how insidious and dangerous +such theories were, I endeavoured to show, as +forcibly as I could, that there had been no attempt +by England at coercion of this Dominion to help +her in the struggle against Germany. Of course, +as previously explained, Great Britain being at +war with the German Empire, the whole British +Empire was at war. But no one in England ever +intended to propose to force the colonies to engage +actively into the fight. The Imperial Parliament +would certainly not have taken into consideration +any such proposition.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[69]</a></span></p> + +<p>But is it not plain and beyond discussion that +we, <i>ourselves</i>, had the undoubted right to intervene +in the war to the extent that we would consider +it our bounden duty to do so?</p> + +<p>Evidently we could not remain neutral in the +great conflict. At the very moment that Great +Britain was at war with Germany, Canada, a +British Colony, was part and parcel of the belligerent +Sovereign State, the British Empire. By an +incredible misconception, the Nationalist leaders +confounded <i>neutrality</i> with <i>non-participation</i> in +the war, if we had so decided.</p> + +<p>To be, or not to be, neutral, was not within our +constitutional rights. If Germany, either by land +or by sea, had attacked our territory, as she had +the undoubted belligerent right to do, would it +have availed us an iota to implore her mercy +by affirming that we were neutral? Could we +have pretended that she was violating neutral +territory?</p> + +<p>No one with the least notion of International +Law would for a moment hesitate to give the true +answers to those questions.</p> + +<p>But the very different question to participate, +or not, in the war, was for us alone to decide according +to our constitutional charter. We have +freely, deliberately, decided to do our share in the +great war. We continue and persevere in our noble +task, freely and deliberately.</p> + +<p>It is admitted by all that under the actual +constitutional organization of the Empire, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[70]</a></span> +Imperial Parliament could not require the autonomous +colonies to participate in the war. But no +one can assuredly deny to that Parliament the +right, in the case of an imminent peril, to formulate +the desire that the autonomous colonies would help +Great Britain to conjure the threatened calamity.</p> + +<p>But, in the present case, the Imperial Parliament +has not even been under the necessity of expressing +such a legitimate wish, for the obvious +reason that the colonies at once took their patriotic +stand in favor of the cause of England and her +Allies. If the colonies had not so decided, of their +own free will, it is most likely that the Imperial +Parliament would not have expressed the wish for +the assistance of the Dominions overseas.</p> + +<p>The hearty support granted by the colonies to +Great Britain, to develop its full value, had to be +spontaneous, enthusiastic. Such it was, such it is, +and such it will be to the last day of the conflict +which victorious conclusion we are so strongly +determined to achieve.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[71]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER X.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Had Canada The Right To Help England?</span></h3> + + +<p>Not satisfied to do the best it could to persuade +our French-Canadian countrymen that they +had been coerced into the war by England, our +"Nationalist School" extensively used the argument +that Canada had not the right to intervene +into the European struggle. I refuted this erroneous +pretension by the following propositions, the +very essence of our constitutional rights and liberties:—</p> + +<p>1.—The Canadian Cabinet had the undoubted +constitutional right to advise His Excellency the +Governor-General to approve the measures to be +taken to give effect to their decision to participate +in the war, decision and measures for which they +were responsible to the Canadian Parliament and +to the Canadian Electorate.</p> + +<p>2.—The Canadian Parliament had the undoubted +constitutional right to approve or disapprove +the decision and the measures of the +Cabinet. Parliament approved that decision and +those measures, acting within their constitutional +right.</p> + +<p>3.—Even at the time I was writing, it could +evidently be affirmed that the Canadian Electorate<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[72]</a></span> +had approved the stand taken by both the Canadian +Cabinet and the Canadian Parliament according +to well known and defined constitutional +usages.</p> + +<p>Was it not proved beyond reasonable controversy, +that the Canadian people heartily approved +the decision of their Parliament to help in the +great war?</p> + +<p>Let me summarize the evidence as follows:—</p> + +<p>1.—The war policy of the Cabinet, at the +special session called in August, 1914, for that +very purpose, was unanimously approved by +Parliament, no Senator and no Member of the +House of Commons moving to censure the responsible +ministers for their decision to have Canada +to participate in the war. The two great political +parties have solemnly sanctioned that decision.</p> + +<p>2.—Public opinion was also very strongly +proved by the almost unanimity of the public press +patriotically supporting the stand taken by Parliament. +The exceptions were so few, that, as +usual, they contributed to emphasize the soundness +of the general rule.</p> + +<p>3.—During the three years following the decision +of the Canadian Parliament, a great number +of large public meetings were held throughout +Canada, and addressed by many leading and influential +citizens all approving the action of Parliament. +The meetings enthusiastically concurred +in the powerful indorsation of the war policy of +the speakers.</p> + +<p>In a few public gatherings some disapproval<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[73]</a></span> +was expressed, but not one meeting would go to +the length of passing "Resolutions" censuring the +Cabinet and the Parliament of Canada, or declaring +that our Dominion should not have interfered +into the war.</p> + +<p>4.—Not one petition against the Canadian +intervention into the war was addressed to Parliament.</p> + +<p>5.—Leading Clergymen, of all denominations; +leaders of political associations almost of all +shades of opinion; financial, industrial, commercial +leaders, all of them approved the patriotic +interference of Canada into the war.</p> + +<p>6.—The evident general approval of the unanimous +decision, taken in 1916, to extend the +Parliamentary term.</p> + +<p>7.—The wonderful success of the public loans +raised for war purposes.</p> + +<p>8.—The enlightened and generous patriotism +with which the country has accepted and paid war +taxation.</p> + +<p>9.—But, above all, the voluntary recruiting of +four hundred thousand men of all social conditions +who have rallied to the flag of the Empire for the +defence of her existence and for the triumph of +Civilization and Justice.</p> + +<p>I, therefore, drew the undeniable conclusion +that, contrary to the "Nationalist" pretension, +Canada was participating in the war in the most +regular constitutional way, without even the shadow +of a breach of our Canadian autonomy, of our +constitutional rights and liberties.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[74]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XI.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Duty of Canada.</span></h3> + + +<p>Having affirmed that Canada had no right to +interfere in the war, the "Nationalist" leaders at +once concluded that she was not in duty bound to do +so. That most discreditable inference was, of +course, the natural sequence of the wrong principle +aforesaid. They further drew the conclusion +that it was no part of the duty of Canadians +to join the Colors to help winning the war.</p> + +<p>It was in flat contradiction of those erroneous +notions that I positively declared, in my letter dedicating +my book to my French Canadian compatriots, +that "<i>in defending with the most sincere +conviction the sacred cause of the Allies, I am +doing my duty as a free subject of the British +Empire, as a citizen of Canada and of the Province +of Quebec, as a son of France, as a devoted +servant of Justice and Right</i>."</p> + +<p>Very narrow minded indeed is the man who +has no higher conception of his duty than the one +limiting him to the observance of positive and negative +laws enacted by the legitimate authority to +protect society and every one of its members.</p> + +<p>When England, together with the other leading +nations, was brutally challenged by Germany,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[75]</a></span> +and threatened in her very national existence, it is +beyond comprehension that Canada, and all the +British colonial possessions overseas, could so mistake +their bounden duty as to refuse rushing to +help the Mother Country in such a trying occurrence. +Moreover, have we not, merely as men, duties +to perform to protect Civilization against the deadly +attack of barbarism, to have Justice and Right +triumphant in international relations?</p> + +<p>It is a matter of deep wonder to me that any +one could have been so blind as not to perceive that +in joining with Great Britain to defend the cause +of the Allies, we were surely defending our own +territory, our own soil, our own homes. How incredible +was the "Nationalist" contention that we +should have waited for the actual German attack +of our land before mustering our resources of resistance. +Who could not see, at a glance, that if +Germany had, as it fully expected, easily triumphed +over the combined forces of France, England +and Russia, it would have been sheer madness +to attempt resisting the victorious onslaught of a +few hundred thousands of her veteran soldiers, +whose valour would have been doubled by the enthusiasm +of their European conquest.</p> + +<p>After mature consideration of the possible results +of the disastrous defeat of the combined +efforts of the Allies, both on land and sea, the conclusion +was forced upon my mind that Germany, +ferociously elated by such a wonderful success, +would no doubt have exacted from England the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[76]</a></span> +cession of Canada to her Empire. So that without +even firing a gun against our territory, our +wide Dominion would have been instantly transferred +from the British to the German Sovereignty. +I shuddered at such a vision, and still more deeply +realized how much we, Canadians, were all in duty +bound to help the Allies in crushing Prussian +militarism.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[77]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Soudanese and South African Wars.</span></h3> + + +<p>In the two previously mentioned pamphlets, +Mr. Bourassa argued at length to prove that Canada +had been led to intervene in the great European +war as a consequence of her intervention in +the South African War. It is well known throughout +the Dominion that the South African conflict +was the occasion chosen by the "Nationalist" +leader to proclaim his doctrine that the autonomous +colonies should have nothing to do with the +wars of the Empire—<span class="smcap">les guerres de l'empire</span>. He +then strongly opposed Canadian support of Great +Britain in her struggle in South Africa.</p> + +<p>In one of his pamphlets, Mr. Bourassa affirmed +that the Government of Sir John A. Macdonald +had, in 1884, refused the request of the Imperial +Government to interfere in its favour in the Soudanese +war. Well aware of the events of this +struggle, I positively knew that the "Nationalist" +leader's assertion was not borne out by the facts, +and was historically false. I considered it my +duty, in a special chapter, to explain fully the circumstances +of the case to my French Canadian +countrymen.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[78]</a></span></p> + +<p>It should be well remembered that England +was brought into the Soudanese conflict on account +of her relations with Egypt, which she had +delivered from the Turkish yoke.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa prefaced his above mentioned +affirmation by recalling the fact that it was in consideration +of the Soudanese difficulties that "<i>for +the first time in the history of the Colonial +Empire of Great Britain, offers of armed support +were made by the autonomous colonies</i>."</p> + +<p>Is it not evident that if—as was true—such +offers were made spontaneously by the Colonies, it +cannot be pretended that the proffered armed support +was asked by England. If England did not +solicit such support, it is plain that Sir John A. +Macdonald and his Cabinet could not refuse what +was never applied for.</p> + +<p>What are the true historical facts?</p> + +<p>In November 1884, General Laurie, who has +represented one of the electoral divisions of Nova +Scotia at Ottawa, who has also held a seat in the +British House of Commons, took the initiative to +propose to raise a Canadian regiment for the campaign +in the Soudan. In the regular official way, +General Laurie's offer was addressed to the Secretary +of State for the Colonies, Lord Derby. The +Imperial Government declined the offer.</p> + +<p>On the 7th of February, 1885, on hearing the +news of the disaster of Khartoum, which caused +great excitement in England, and naturally created +a strong public feeling to avenge the outrage,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[79]</a></span> +General Laurie, always enthusiastic, tendered +anew his services. He was not the only Canadian +officer wishing to go and fight the cruel Soudaneses. +A member of the Canadian Parliament, +Colonel Williams, commanding the 46th volunteer +battalion of Durham-East, also desired to take part +in the African campaign with his regiment. On +the 9th of February, 1885, he tendered his proposition +to Sir Charles Tupper, then High Commissioner +in London, who sent it to the Colonial Office.</p> + +<p>On the 10th of February, His Excellency the +Governor General, Lord Lansdowne, cabled to the +Colonial Secretary that the offers of military +service were very numerous. This spontaneous +movement, so rapidly spreading, was the forerunner +of those of 1899 and 1914. Thirty years +ago, and long before, there were brave men in +Canada. There always have been and ever will +be.</p> + +<p>These news were no doubt very encouraging +for the Imperial authorities.</p> + +<p>Lord Derby, thanking Lord Lansdowne, begged +him to say "<i>Whether they</i> (the offers of service) +<i>are sanctioned and recommended by the +Dominion Government</i>."</p> + +<p>On the 12th of February, Lord Lansdowne +answered Lord Derby that the Dominion Government +was ready to approve recruiting in Canada +for service in Egypt or elsewhere, provided that +the men would be enlisted under the authority of +the Imperial Army Discipline Act, and the expense +paid by the Imperial Treasury.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[80]</a></span></p> + +<p>It consequently follows from the above despatches +that the Soudanese campaign offered to +many officers of our volunteer Militia the long +wished for opportunity to freely tender their services +to the Imperial Government; that the British +authorities never applied to the Canadian Government, +then presided by Sir John A. Macdonald, +for armed support in Soudanese Africa; that, on +being officially informed of the offers of service +received by His Excellency the Governor General, +the Colonial Secretary, before accepting or declining +them, enquired if the Canadian Government +sanctioned and recommended them; that the Governor +General answered him in the affirmative, +the recruiting to be made according to the Imperial +Military Act at the expense of the Imperial +exchequer.</p> + +<p>On the 16th of February, the War Minister, +then the Marquis of Hartington, informed the +Colonial Secretary that he had come to the conclusion +to decline with thanks the offers of service +from Canada, for the reason that it would have +taken too long a time to recruit and organize the +regiments offered by General Laurie and Colonel +Williams.</p> + +<p>Was I not right, when I refuted Mr. Bourassa's +assertion, in saying that if a <i>refusal</i> was <i>then</i> +given, it was by the British Government who had +received the freely tendered services, and not by +the Canadian Government, to whom no demand of +armed support had been made by Great Britain?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[81]</a></span></p> + +<p>If it is indeed very astonishing that Mr. +Bourassa should have taken the responsibility to +affirm that the Government of Sir John A. Macdonald +had refused to help Great Britain in the +Soudanese campaign, it is easy to understand his +object in so doing. His purpose was to convince +his French Canadian readers that the political +leaders at the head of the Government, in 1899 and +1914, together with the Canadian Parliament, had, +in a revolutionary way, reversed the traditional +policy of Canada of non-intervention in the "wars +of the Empire"—<i>les guerres de l'empire</i>. And to +achieve his end, so detrimental to the best interests +of the Dominion, he did not hesitate to draw an +absolutely erroneous conclusion from undeniable +historical facts.</p> + +<p>The "Nationalist" leader was very anxious to +charge the chieftains of the two great political +parties with an equal responsibility for what he +terms a "Revolution" in our relations with the +Mother Country. With this object constantly in +view, he pretended that the intervention of Canada +in the South African War created the precedent +which brought about the Dominion participation +in the European war, in 1914. In order to stir +up to the utmost the prejudices of the French +Canadians, he boldly qualified the South African +conflict as an <i>infamous crime</i> on the part of +England.</p> + +<p>Unfortunately, the true history of the difficulties +which culminated in the Boer War of 1899,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[82]</a></span> +was at the time little known throughout Canada, +and even less particularly in the Province of Quebec. +At the outbreak of the struggle, wishing to +form a sound opinion of the causes of which it was +the direct outcome, I made an exhaustive study of +the South African question, beginning at the very +inception of the Dutch settlement dating as far +back as 1652, the year during which the Dutch +East India Company occupied Table Bay. Six +years later, in 1658, French Huguenots reached +South Africa, joining with the Dutch Reformists, +who rather energetically did all they could to assimilate +them. Still later on, besides some few +German immigrants, a third group of Europeans +settled on the African coast. They were Englishmen.</p> + +<p>All the Europeans, on landing in South Africa, +few in numbers, had at once to contend with +the black race numbering many millions. The +history of the long struggle between European +civilization, represented by the English and Dutch +immigrants, and African barbarity, is indeed very +interesting. Carefully read and studied in all its +bearings, it strongly impressed upon my mind the +conviction that had it not been for the timely +armed protection they often solicited and received +from England, the Dutch Boers would certainly +have been annihilated by the tribes of the black +race. They could not hope to successfully resist +the onslaughts to which they were repeatedly submitted. +They were saved from utter destruction<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[83]</a></span> +by the strong arm of Great Britain, occupying an +important strategical position by her Cape Colony. +The British Government had favoured the +settlement of the sons of England in South Africa, +for the purpose of assuring, by a powerful naval +station, the freedom of communication with the +great regions soon to develop into her vast Indian +Empire.</p> + +<p>How, and under what circumstances, was +British Sovereignty established in South Africa? +I considered this question the most important to +ascertain, in order to judge fairly the history of +the last century in those regions. It was settled +by the Peace Congress of Vienna, in 1815. All the +European nations represented at that congress, +have sanctioned British Sovereignty in South +Africa upon the condition of the payment by England +to the Kingdom of the Netherlands, of which +Holland was then a part, of the sum of $30,000,000. +Consequently the Sovereign Rights of Great Britain +in South Africa were henceforth undeniable.</p> + +<p>In my French book, I somewhat extensively +summarized the development of the British and +Dutch groups of settlers in South Africa. It is +well known that the Boers are of Dutch origin. +That a rivalry did develop between the two national +elements, is not to be wondered at by any one +having some knowledge of the history of the world.</p> + +<p>I do not consider it necessary to go at any +length in relating the vicissitudes of the conflict +between the aspirations of the Boer element and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[84]</a></span> +the undoubted rights of British suzerainty. As a +rule they are sufficiently well known by my +English readers.</p> + +<p>But I wish to emphasize the two undeniable +facts: first, that throughout this protracted contest, +England did perseveringly try to favour South +Africa with the largest possible measure of political +liberty. Second, that the crisis was finally +brought about by the persistent determination of +the Government of Pretoria to refuse justice to +the Uitlanders and to the British capitalists who, +at the urgent request of President Kruger, had +invested many millions in the development of the +very valuable mines recently discovered in the +Transvaal territory.</p> + +<p>Though England had agreed to the establishment +of the two Republics of the Transvaal and +Orange, she had maintained her suzerainty on +those territories, which suzerainty the Government +of Pretoria had again recognized by the +Convention of 1884.</p> + +<p>The most convincing proof that England did +not intend any unfair design against the South +African Republics, is the fact that she did not prepare +to resist the armed attack of the Government +of Pretoria which could be easily foreseen by the +intense organization they were evidently making +to impose Boer supremacy in South Africa.</p> + +<p>In his very unjust appreciation of the policy +of Great Britain in South Africa, Mr. Bourassa +kept no account whatever of the very important<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[85]</a></span> +fact that war was declared against England by +the South African Republic. How could Great +Britain have been guilty of a hideous crime in not +bowing to the dictate of President Kruger and his +Government, as the "Nationalist" leader said, is +beyond comprehension.</p> + +<p>England was absolutely within her right in +accepting the challenge of the Government of Pretoria, +and fighting to maintain her flag and her +Sovereignty in South Africa.</p> + +<p>Fortunately, the South African War, characterized +by deeds of heroism on both sides, has +had the most satisfactory conclusion. It is to be +hoped that for many long years the future of that +great country is settled with all the blessings that +political liberty and free institutions will surely +confer on that important part of the British Empire. +The Boers themselves have fully recognized +that their own national development cannot be +better guaranteed and safeguarded than by the +powerful Sovereignty pledged to their protection, +on the only condition of their loyal allegiance to +the flag waving on the fair land where they can +multiply in peace, prosperity and happiness. The +enthusiasm and the admirable courage with which +they have rallied to the support of Great Britain +and her Allies in the present war, is the best evidence +how much they appreciate the advantages +of their new conditions in the great South African +Dominion destined to such a grand future.</p> + +<p>I most sincerely deplore the persistent efforts +of the "Nationalist" leader to pervert more and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[86]</a></span> +more the mind of my French Canadian countrymen +by his so very unfair appreciation of the +nature of the South African conflict. It was with +the hope of counteracting them that I introduced a +special chapter in my French edition explaining, +as fully as I could, though in a condensed form, +the South African question.</p> + +<p>The assertion that the participation of Canada +in the present European war was the sequence +of the precedent of our intervention in the South +African struggle, is also most injustifiable and untenable. +Had Canada taken no part whatever in +the South African War, it would not have made +the least difference with regard to the decision of +the Canadian people to support Great Britain and +the Allies in their gigantic effort to put an end to +Prussian terrorism. The assertion which I most +emphatically contradict could have no other object +but to prejudice the public mind against Canadian +intervention in any of the wars of the Empire—<i>les +guerres de l'empire</i>.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[87]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XIII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">British and German Aspirations Compared.</span></h3> + + +<p>In the attempt to justify his opposition to the +Canadian armed support of the Allies' cause, Mr. +Bourassa repeatedly asserted that Great Britain +was as much as Germany aspiring to rule the +whole world. He pretends that there is no difference +between Anglo-Saxonism and Germanism.</p> + +<p>How unjust and dangerous is such a doctrine +is evident to any fair minded man. It was no +doubt calculated to prejudice the French Canadians +against Great Britain, by telling them that +the sacrifices they were called upon to make were +imposed upon them only to favour the British determination +to reach the goal of her ambition:—universal +domination.</p> + +<p>I strongly repudiated such assertions and +vindicated England's course and policy.</p> + +<p>To accuse Great Britain to aspire to universal +domination is a most unwarranted charge, contradicted +by the whole history of the last century during +which she was the most determined supporter +of peace.</p> + +<p>Though one of the great Powers of the world, +England never undertook to organize a large +standing army. How could she aspire to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[88]</a></span> +world's domination without a complete military +organization comprising many millions of men, is +what I am unable to understand.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa's argument to prove his assertion +is based on the efforts of England to maintain +and develop her naval forces so as to guarantee +her supremacy on the high seas of the world. How +he failed to realize that Great Britain, on account +of her insular position, close to the European continent, +is by nature itself bound, of sheer necessity, +to protect herself by the strength of her military +naval power, is beyond comprehension. Supremacy +on the seas is for the Mother Country a mere +question of national existence,—to be or not to be. +But supremacy on the seas cannot, and will never, +permit England to attain anything like universal +domination. And why? For the obvious reason +that Great Britain is not, and never can become, a +continental Power, in the exact sense of the word.</p> + +<p>I explained, conclusively, I believe, that the +case would be very different if Germany succeeded +in her efforts to supplant England's supremacy +on the seas. When the Berlin Government undertook +to build a huge military fleet, Germany was +the greatest continental military Power. What +were her expectations when she adopted that +threatening naval policy? The Berlin authorities +were very confident that when they would decide +to bring on the great war for which they had been +strenuously preparing for half a century, they +would in a few months have continental Europe at<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[89]</a></span> +their feet and under their sway. Triumphant over +Europe they would have at once dominated Asia +and a great part of Africa. The next surest way +for the German Empire to reach universal domination +was to break England's power on the seas. +What is impossible for England to accomplish, on +account of her insular position, Germany, being a +continental Empire, could achieve if she became +mistress of the seas.</p> + +<p>The present war is the proof evident that the +mighty power of England on the seas has been the +salvation of her national existence and, almost +equally, that of France and Italy. It kept the +oceans open for the trade of all the Allied and neutral +nations. He is willingly blind, intellectually, +the man who does not see that deprived of the +matchless protection of her naval forces, Great +Britain could be starved and subdued in a few +months by an enemy ruling the waves against her.</p> + +<p>Is it possible to suppose that any man aspiring +to help moulding the public opinion of his +countrymen, ignores that with the relatively small +extent of the territory it can devote to agricultural +production, Great Britain can never feed her +actual population of over forty-five millions, most +likely to reach sixty millions in the not very distant +future. Consequently how unjust, how extravagant, +is it to accuse England of any aspiration +to dominate the world by means of the sacrifices +she is absolutely bound to make for the only sake +of her self-defence, her self-protection.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[90]</a></span></p> + +<p>If he does not know, I will no doubt cordially +oblige the "Nationalist" leader by informing him +that Great Britain, usually importing food products +to the amount of seven to eight hundred +millions of dollars, for many years past, required +as much as a billion dollars worth of them in the +war year of 1915. It is so easy to foresee that the +continual increase of the population of the United +Kingdom, by the new large developments which +will surely follow the war in all industrial, commercial +and financial pursuits, will cause a relative +increase in the importations of food products +likely to reach, and even exceed before long, an average +total annual value of a billion and a quarter +dollars.</p> + +<p>None of the European continental Powers has +the same imperious reasons as England to take the +proper means to guarantee her control of the seas. +How is it then that Germany is the only Power to +object to England's policy, if it is not for the ultimate +object to attain universal domination by the +overthrow of Great Britain's ascendency on the +wide oceans, which would permit her to realize +her long cherished aim by the combined powerful +effort of her gigantic military forces both on land +and sea.</p> + +<p>With regard to England's naval supremacy, +the "Nationalist" leader is also committed to other +opinions which I strongly contradicted. He entirely +forgets that beyond the sea coast limits, well +defined by International Law, no Sovereign rights<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[91]</a></span> +can be claimed on the high seas. The navigation +of the ocean is free to all nations by nature itself. +Has any Government ever entertained the foolish +idea that the broad Atlantic could, for instance, +be divided into so many parts as the European, +Asiatic, or American continents, over which several +States could exercise Sovereign powers? No +Chinese Wall can be built on the seas.</p> + +<p>My own view of the case, which I believe to be +the correct one, is that England's naval supremacy +means nothing more nor less than the police of the +seas, and the protection of the flags of all the Nations +navigating them, besides being, of course and +necessarily, the guarantee of her National existence.</p> + +<p>Blind also, intellectually, is the British subject +not sufficiently inspired by the true sense of +the duties of Loyalty, who does not understand +that once Great Britain's maritime power would +be crushed and the United Kingdom either conquered +or obliged to an humiliating peace which +would ruin all her future prospects, the Colonial +Empire would equally be at the mercy of the victorious +enemy of the Mother Country.</p> + +<p>With the most earnest conviction, I have tried, +to the best of my ability, to persuade my French-Canadian +compatriots of the inevitable dangers +ahead if the false views which were so persistingly +impressed upon their minds were ever to prevail, +and the aim they undoubtedly favour to be realized.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[92]</a></span></p> + +<p>Another argument widely used by our "Nationalist" +School to influence the opinion of the +French Canadians against Canada's participation +in the war, was that Great Britain herself was not +doing what she ought to win the victory. I have +personally heard this false objection repeated by +many—unconsciously of course—who were influenced +in so saying by the "Nationalist" press.</p> + +<p>No more unfair charge could have been made +against England. I could not help being indignant +at reading it, knowing as I did, by daily acquired +information what an immense effort the United +Kingdom had been making, from the very beginning +of the hostilities, to play its powerful part in +the great war into which it had nobly decided to +enter to avenge its honour, to defend the Empire +and the whole world against German barbarous +militarism.</p> + +<p>I have already commented on the immense +service guaranteed to the Allied nations by the +British fleet. To illustrate the wonderful and admirable +military effort of Great Britain, I will +quote some very important figures from the most +interesting Report of the British War Cabinet, for +the year 1917, presented to Parliament by Command +of His Majesty.</p> + +<p>Under the title "<i>Construction and Supply</i>" +the Report says:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>During the past year the Naval Service has undergone continual +expansion in order to enable it to meet every demand made +upon it, not only in the seas surrounding these islands, but in the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[93]</a></span>Mediterranean, the Persian Gulf, the Red Sea, the Arctic Ocean, +the Pacific, and the Atlantic, where it has co-operated with the +Naval forces of the Allies. The displacement tonnage of the +Royal Navy in 1914 was 2,400,000 tons. To-day it has increased +by 75 per cent. <b>(—making a total of 4,200,000 tons—)</b>. The ships and +vessels of all kinds employed in the Naval Service in September, +1914, after the whole of the mobilisation had been completed, had +a tonnage of just over 4 million; now the figure is well over 6 +million. Transports, fleet attendants and overseas oilers and +similar auxiliary vessels at the outbreak of war numbered 23; the +Admiralty to-day control nearly 700 such craft. The strength of +the personnel, which was 145,000, has been increased to 420,000.</p> + +<p>From these brief particulars regarding the ships and their +manning, an estimate can be formed of the expansions that have +been made in the auxiliary services, such as guns, torpedoes, munitions, +and stores of all kinds, anti-submarine apparatus, mines, &c., +and some idea is gained of the demands that have been made upon +the great army of workers on shore, the men in the Royal dockyards +and arsenals, in the shipyards, the engine shops, and the +factories, without whose help the Fleet could not be maintained as +a fighting force.</p> + +<p>As regards warship and auxiliary ship construction, the output +during the last 12 months has been between three and four +times the average annual output for the few years preceding the +war.</p> + +<p>The Admiralty now control all the dry docks in the country,...—250 +merchant ships are being repaired each week, either +in dry dock or afloat.</p> + +<p>Since the beginning of the war, 31,470 British war vessels +have been placed in dock or on the slips <b>(—as many as 225 being +repaired in one week—)</b>.... These figures do not include +repair work carried out to the vessels of our Allies....</p></div> + +<p>The Transport Service is of the highest importance +in carrying on the war. What has been +the achievement of England on that score? Under +the title:—"<i>Transportation</i>" the War Cabinet +Report proves its immensity as follows:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The record of what has been done by the transport services +for the Armies of the Allies shows a stupendous amount of work +accomplished, which constitutes one of the brilliant achievements +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[94]</a></span>of the war. There had been transported overseas up till the end +of August, 1917, the last date for which complete statistics are +available—some:—13 million human beings—combatants, wounded, +medical personnel, refugees, prisoners, &c.; 2 million horses and +mules; 1/2 million vehicles; 25 million tons of explosive and supplies +for the armies; ... 51 million tons of coal and oil fuel for +the use of our Fleets, our Armies, and to meet the needs of our +Allies.</p> + +<p>The operations of the seas are on such a large scale that +it is difficult to realize all that is involved in sea transportation; for +example, over 7,000 personnel are transported, and more than +30,000 tons of stores and supplies have to be imported daily into +France for the maintenance of our own army. About 567 steamers, +of approximately 1 3/4 million tons, are continually employed in the +service of carrying troops and stores to the Armies in France and +to the forces in various theatres of war in the East.</p></div> + +<p>We all know that the Berlin Government expected +that the submarine campaign would result +in an early final victory for the Central Empires. +Herr von Bethmann Hollweg, then the Imperial +Chancellor, said:—"<i>The Blockade must succeed +within a limited number of weeks, within which +America cannot effectively participate in the +operations</i>."</p> + +<p>How he was mistaken, and extravagant were +his expectations, events have proved. This sentence +is also proof evident that he realized how +effective the United States effort would become, if +the submarine campaign did not succeed within a +few weeks.</p> + +<p>The iniquitous submarine campaign, re-opened +early in the year 1917, "<i>added materially +to the responsibilities of the Navy. To meet this +new and serious menace drastic steps had to be +taken to supplement those adopted in the previous +December and January</i>."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[95]</a></span></p> + +<p>The Report adds:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>A large number of new destroyers have been built and at +the same time auxiliary patrol services have been expanded enormously +so as to deal with the nefarious submarine and minelaying +methods of the enemy. Before the outbreak of the war there were +under 20 vessels employed as minesweepers and on auxiliary patrol +duties. To-day the number of craft used for these purposes at +home and abroad is about 3,400, and is constantly increasing.</p> + +<hr style="width: 45%;" /> + +<p>A new feature of the means adopted for the protection of +trade against submarines has been a return to the convoy system +as practised in bygone wars. It has been markedly effective in +reducing the losses. During the last few months over 90 per cent. +of all vessels sailing in all the Atlantic trades were convoyed....</p> + +<p>The Royal Naval Air Service at the outbreak of war possessed +a personnel of under 800; at the present moment the numbers +approach 46,000 and are continually increasing.... Mention +must also be made of the great value of the air services in combating +the submarine menace round our coasts.... Illustrating +their extent it may be stated that in one week the aircraft +patrol round the British coasts alone flies 30,000 miles.</p> + +<p>The general result of the German attack, therefore, though +serious enough, is far from unprecedented. In the two years after +Trafalgar, when our command of the sea was unquestioned, we +still lost 1,045 merchant ships by capture, and in the whole period +from 1794 to 1875 we lost over 10,000 merchant ships.</p> + +<p>Nor should we lose sight of the very heavy losses sustained +by the enemy in the present war. At the commencement of hostilities, +Germany had 915 merchant ships abroad, of which only +158 got home safely; the remainder within a few days were +cleared from the oceans, either captured or driven to shelter in +neutral ports. In the aggregate the German Mercantile Marine +consisted of over 5 million tons of shipping; at the present time +nearly half of this has been sunk or captured by ourselves or our +Allies, while the bulk of the rest is lying useless in harbour.</p></div> + +<p>Let me now refer to the military effort of +Great Britain. Under the title:—"<i>Strength of the +Army," &c.</i>, the War Cabinet Report gives the +following most inspiring figures.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[96]</a></span></p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The effort which the British nations have made under the +one item of "Provision of Men for the Armed Forces of the +Crown" amounts to not less than 7,500,000 men, and of these 60.4 +per cent. have been contributed by England, 8.3 per cent. by +Scotland, 3.7 per cent. by Wales, 2.3 per cent. by Ireland, 1.2 per cent. +by the Dominions and the Colonies, while the remainder, 13.3 per +cent., composed of native fighting troops, labour corps, carriers, +&c., represent the splendid contribution made by India and our +various African and other Dependencies.</p> + +<hr style="width: 45%;" /> + +<p><b>Royal Artillery.</b>—The personnel of the Royal Artillery increased +17.6 per cent., between August, 1916, and August, 1917.</p> + +<p>In the first nine months of 1917 the supply of modern anti-aircraft +guns in the field increased 44 per cent., that of field guns +17 per cent., of field-howitzers 26 per cent., of heavy guns 40 per +cent., of medium howitzers 104 per cent., of heavy howitzers 16 per +cent., and of heavy-guns on railway mountings 100 per cent.; these +last have an increased range of about 35 per cent.... +We have also supplied large numbers of heavy guns and trench +mortars to our Allies in different theatres of war.</p> + +<hr style="width: 45%;" /> + +<p>The Medical Service has continued to expand with the +growth of the Army and its strength is now largely in excess of +our whole original Expeditionary Force.... More than +17,000 women are employed as nurses and over 28,000 others are +engaged in military hospitals on various forms of work.... +Hospitals in the United Kingdom now number more than 2,000.</p> + +<hr style="width: 45%;" /> + +<p>The health of the troops in the United Kingdom is actually +better than the peace rate; the same is the case in France, excluding +admissions to hospital by reason of wounds.</p></div> + +<p>The above quoted figures prove that out of a +total of 7,500,000 men for the Armed Forces of the +British Crown, Great Britain—the United Kingdom—had +contributed, at the end of last year, 5,625,000, +out of which number the shore of England +and Wales amounted to 4,800,000. The British +Colonial Empire's contribution had been 1,875,000.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[97]</a></span></p> + +<p>At the date of the current year—August, 1918—I +am writing, I can safely calculate that the +number of men for the Armed Forces of the British +Crown—using the words of the Official Report +above quoted—has reached, at least, <i>the grand and +magnificent total of 8,000,000</i>. The percentage of +respective contributions of the United Kingdom +and the Colonial Empire no doubt remaining the +same, the relative number of each of them is,—for +the United Kingdom 6,000,000; for the Colonies +2,000,000.</p> + +<p>I consider the War Cabinet Report of 1917 so +interesting, so encouraging, that my readers will, +I am confident, kindly bear with me in a few more +very important quotations, the full Report itself +having had only a very limited circulation in +Canada.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">Transport.</span></div> + +<p>In addition to the prodigious Naval effort of +England, both military and mercantile, previously +illustrated, Great Britain has most powerfully +contributed to the fighting operations on land by +an immense improvement in transportation +facilities by railway construction in all British +theatres of war.</p> + +<p>The Report says:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>In all these theatres railways have come to play a more +and more important part. In France a vast light railway system +has been created, involving the supply during the present year of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[98]</a></span>approximately 1,700 miles of track and the whole of the equipment.... +Exclusive of these light railway systems, the total +amount of permanent railway track supplied complete to all +theatres of war is about 3,600 miles. In Egypt the railway crossing +the desert from the Suez Canal has now reached and passed +Gaza. In Mesopotamia the rapid and successful movements of our +troops have only been made possible by the construction of a +whole series of lines since the beginning of 1917. The development +of road-building has been on a similar scale, and the shipments of +material, equipment and stores for these two purposes during the +last nine months have averaged 200,000 tons a month. Much +labour has also been spent in the organisation of an Overland +Line of Communication through France and Italy to the Mediterranean +in order to save shipping. This line was opened for personnel +traffic in June, 1917, and for goods traffic early in August.</p> + +<hr style="width: 45%;" /> + +<p>In France the conveyance of supplies of all kinds to our +armies along the French rivers and canals is performed by a large +fleet of tugs, barges, and self-propelled barges. The fleet thus +employed in France consists of over 700 vessels, and the tonnage +carried by it averages over 50,000 tons per week.</p></div> + + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">The Air Service.</span></div> + +<p>In a recital indicating generally what steps +have been taken in matters of administration and +control, the Report says:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>From the point of view of defence, the new arm presented +problems pregnant with at least equal importance. The proud and +ancient inviolability of these islands was being challenged in a +new and startling fashion, and the seriousness of the problem was +added to by the fact that the geographical position of the capital +of the Empire rendered it particularly inviting to attack from the +air.</p></div> + +<p>Respecting the supply of Aircraft, the Report +says that:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>In endeavoring to describe the measures taken to meet the +aircraft needs of the Navy and Army, the writer is at once confronted +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[99]</a></span>by the fact that the information desired by the country is +precisely the information desired by the enemy. What the country +wants to know is what has been the expansion in our Air +Services; whether we have met and are meeting all the demands +of the Navy and of the Army, both for replacement of obsolete +machines by the most modern types, and for the increase of our +fighting strength in the air; what proportion of the national resources +in men, material and factories is being devoted to aviation; +what the expansion is likely to be in the future. These are precisely +the facts which we should like to know with regard to the +German air service, and for that reason it would be inadmissible +for us to supply Germany with corresponding information about +ourselves by publishing a statement on the subject.</p> + +<p>It can be said that the expansion of our Air Services is +keeping pace generally with the growing needs of the Navy and +the Army.</p></div> + +<p>In Chapter VIII, under the heading:—"<i>The +Ministry of Munitions in 1917</i>," the following is +read:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The number of persons engaged in the production of munitions +in October, 1917, was 2,022,000 men and 704,000 women, as +compared with 1,921,000 men and 535,000 women in January. +They have thus been increased during the past six months at the +rate of 11,000 men and 19,000 women per month. These numbers +include those employed in Government and in private establishments, +in the principal munition industries, chemical and explosive +trades, engineering and munition plants, furnaces and +foundries, in shipbuilding and in mining other than coal-mining. +The total represents approximately two-thirds of the total labour +occupied on Government work in industry.</p></div> + +<p>The preceding official statistics prove most +conclusively that actually, and ever since the beginning +of the third year of the war, more than +<i>twelve millions</i> of men and women—more than +the fourth of the total population of the United +Kingdom—have been either in the Armed Forces +of the British Crown—Navy and Army—or in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[100]</a></span> +shipbuilding yards, in munitions factories, in +transportation on land and sea, in the Medical +Service, in the Air Service, &c., employed for the +success of the cause of the Allies.</p> + + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">The Financial Effort of Great Britain.</span></div> + +<p>The gigantic military effort of Great Britain, +in all the branches of its wonderfully developed +organization, as above illustrated, was only rendered +possible by a corresponding financial contribution.</p> + +<p>During the financial year preceding the +outbreak of the war, the total expenditure of the +Government of Great Britain was $987,464,845. +The hostilities have imposed upon the United +Kingdom vast expenditures. "For that period"—again +quoting the War Cabinet Report—"from the +1st April, 1917, to the 1st December, 1917, the +total Exchequer issues for expenditure (including +Consolidated Fund Service and Supply Services) +were £1,799,223,000,—($8,796,115,000) representing +a daily average for that period of £7,344,000 +($36,720,000)."</p> + +<p>At this rate of expenditure, the total for the +year equals at least $13,500,000,000. But the financial +charges entailed by the war being constantly +on the increase, they can be calculated at a daily +average of no less than $40,000,000 until the close +of the conflict.</p> + +<p>England has not only incurred very heavy +financial obligations, met both by an enormously<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[101]</a></span> +increased taxation and the issue of large National +loans, to pay the cost of her own war expenditure, +but she has also generously helped her friends +whose financial resources were not so abundant as +her own. To the 1st December, 1917, she had made +advances to the Allies amounting to no less than +$5,930,000,000. In addition to this large amount, +the advances she had made to the Dominions for +the same period summed up $875,000,000.</p> + + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">Achievements of Dominion, Colonial and Indian +Troops.</span></div> + +<p>Under the above title, the War Cabinet Report +concludes a general review of the past year's +effort by paying high tribute to the value of the +services rendered by the whole British Colonial +Empire, in the following elogious terms:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>In the above sketch of military operations during the past +year, it has not been possible to distinguish between the particular +services rendered by the various nations and nationalities of the +Empire. But it must not be forgotten that during the war the +forces of the Crown have become welded into a true Imperial +army, representative of every part of the world-wide British +Commonwealth, and a brief note may be included as to the special +services of the various overseas forces.</p> + +<p>The share of the Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, South +African and Newfoundland contingents in the successes of the 1917 +campaign are well known. The capture of Vimy Ridge in April, +the prolonged and bitter fighting around Lens during the whole +summer and autumn, and the capture of Passchendaele were carried +out by the Canadian Corps, which has thus proved itself as +excellent in offensive as its splendid defence of Ypres in 1915 had +shown it to be in defensive fighting. The New Zealand and Australian +contingents have corresponding achievements to their credit +in their share of the battle of Messines and in the long sustained +and bitterly contested fights in the Ypres salient from July +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[102]</a></span>to November. The South African brigade sustained the brilliant +reputation which it won last year at Delville Wood by the devoted +services it rendered on the battlefields of Arras and Ypres. +Finally, the Newfoundland Regiment took a glorious and costly +part in the same two battles. The troops of all the Dominions +have shown themselves throughout the campaign of 1917 to have +maintained the historic standards of the British Army and have +been worthy rivals of the United Kingdom troops in every military +effort and achievement.</p> + +<p>This testimony to the services rendered by the Dominions +would not be complete without some reference to the part played +by South Africa in German East Africa, where her troops have +borne, under the brilliant leadership of General Van Deventer, a +conspicuous share in a peculiarly arduous campaign.</p> + +<p>The smaller Colonies and Protectorates have naturally been +unable to play so great and conspicuous a part in the World War, +but in their own spheres they have contributed their full share to +the military effort of the Empire. Labour and fighting troops +were freely drawn upon for the Mesopotamian and East African +theatres. West Africa, British East Africa, Uganda, Nyasaland +and Rhodesia have all sent contingents to fight in German East +Africa. 16,000 men from the West Indies have been sent across +the Atlantic; and labour corps from the Eastern Colonies have +been sent to the Mesopotamian and East African fronts, and, despite +unfavourable conditions, to the Western theatre. A large +number of individuals from overseas possessions, such as the +Malay States and Hong Kong, have also joined the Imperial +forces.</p> + +<p>Finally, India's contribution, both in man-power, material +and money, has steadily increased throughout the year. India has +taken a very important share in the victorious campaign in Mesopotamia. +The great majority of the troops in this theatre of war +are Indian. They have fully sustained the high reputation of the +Indian Army for gallantry and endurance. India has been responsible +for much of the supply, medical and transportation system +by water and on land. Indian forces have also rendered conspicuous +service in France, Egypt and East Africa. The question +of the supply of officers, especially medical officers, has been +solved; commissions have been granted to Indians, and a voluntary +Indian Defence Force is now being organised and trained. Special +mention should be made of the loyal and effective assistance +of the Indian ruling princes and chiefs, from the smallest to the +greatest.</p></div><p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[103]</a></span></p> + +<p>The Indian Government has moreover generously +contributed $500,000,000 towards the cost of +the war.</p> + +<p>The foregoing quotations of official figures, of +facts undeniable, of achievements really most extraordinary, +constitute the unanswerable refutation, +complete and crushing, of the Nationalist +charge that England, while not doing her own +duty with regard to the war, was using undue influence +to coerce the British Colonies to participate +in the conflict far beyond the fair proportionate +effort to be expected on their part; that an illegitimate +pressure of Great Britain's Government on +her Colonies was being practised, as insidiously +alleged, to promote her Imperialist ambition of +the World's ascendency.</p> + +<p>Unfortunately, those false and most unjust +notions had taken deeper root in many minds, even +in some who should have been much above such an +unfair misconception, than was at first supposed. +Hence the importance of setting the matter right, +and the necessity of proving that England's war +achievements, in every branch of the Military +Service, were far exceeding what had, at first, +been expected of her, and was ever considered possible. +British pluck and manliness were equal to +the direst emergency that ever called them forth. +Patriotism, courage, determination, perseverance, +rising superior to any increased difficulties, have +truly worked miracles of manly efforts and self-sacrifices +inspired by the noble cause which +brought Great Britain in the World's struggle.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[104]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XIV.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Veritable Aims of The Allies.</span></h3> + + +<p>After doing their utmost to persuade the +French Canadians that the Allies, more especially +England and Russia, were equally responsible for +the war, together with Germany and Austria, our +"Nationalist" leaders moreover asserted that they +were hostile to a just and lasting peace on account +of their unfair claims. In support of their pretension, +they repeatedly affirmed that the Allies +were pledged to the complete destruction of the +German Empire. No more unfounded charge could +be made against the Nations suddenly challenged +to a gigantic struggle for life or death.</p> + +<p>It was very important to protect my French +Canadian countrymen against views which, if not +proved to be absolutely wrong, were calculated to +bias their mind against the Allies. With this +patriotic object strongly impressed upon my mind, +I fully explained what were the veritable aims +of Great Britain, France, Russia and Italy, in +fighting their deadly enemy. When I issued my +French book, the United States had not then +entered the contest. Their declaration of war +against Germany, in the spring of 1917, after the +outrage of the sinking of the Lusitania, and the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[105]</a></span> +numerous criminal provocations of the submarine +campaign, clearly emphasized, once more, what +the Allies had been strenuously struggling for +from the outbreak of the hostilities. They had +taken up the gauntlet savagely thrown to them, +declaring to the world that they would battle to +the last to put an end to German militarism, always +threatening general peace, to protect the +small nations, notably Belgium and Servia, +against the onslaught of mighty and tyrannical +conquerors, to save Humanity, Civilization and +Freedom from the crushing ascendency of autocratic +rule. The great American Republic rallied +with them to the defence of this most sacred cause. +Need I refer to the numerous and eloquent messages +of President Wilson, to the writings of the +American press, and to the declarations of all the +leading public men of the United States, in both +Houses of Congress, or before public meetings, in +support of the contention which was proved beyond +controversy for all fair minded men.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa, whether from sheer misconception, +or blindly carried away by incomprehensible +German sympathies, having their root in his +prejudiced hostility to England, could see no difference +between a war policy aiming at putting an +end to Prussian militarism, and one having for its +object the dismemberment of the German Empire. +Nor could he conceive that fighting for human liberty +was a nobler purpose than struggling for autocratic +tyranny. Though ever posing as the champion<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[106]</a></span> +of the small nationalities, he would not utter +a word of sympathy for martyred Belgium, barbarously +conquered Servia, oppressed Poland, +since the beginning of the war.</p> + +<p>The great conflict once begun under so terrific +conditions, every one somewhat posted with the +immense resources of the belligerents, their respective +warlike spirit and enduring qualities, +could easily foresee that, unfortunately, it was +most likely to last for several years, the contending +parties being so far apart in their respective +aspirations. Elated beyond all reason by her triumph +over France, in 1870, which had for its first +very important result the final creation of the +German Empire, proclaimed to the world from +Versailles,—the bleeding heart of her vanquished +foe,—the new great Power, dominating Central +Europe, lost no time in setting all its energies to +the task of perfecting the most gigantic military +organization ever seen. To all clear sighted men, +Germany could not be supposed to accept the +heavy sacrifices required for such an end with the +sole purpose of maintaining peace. Further conquests +were evidently her inspiring aim.</p> + +<p>Who can forget how Humanity was staggered +by the rapidity of the onslaught of the Teutonic +hordes let loose against nations whose greatest +wish was to keep the peace of the world? In a +sudden rush, the waves of the torrent overran +Belgium and Northern France dashing direct +towards Paris.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[107]</a></span></p> + +<p>The wonderful plan of campaign, so scientifically +conceived and matured, could then be understood +as it was boldly and powerfully developed. +The Berlin military staff, knowing that France +was not sufficiently prepared for the struggle, that +England, if forced to intervene in honour bound, +by the criminal violation of Belgium's neutrality, +would require a couple of years to organize an +army of millions of men, decided to strike the first +blow with such an overpowering strength as to +conquer Belgium in a victorious run and crush +France out of the fight. A couple of months were +to be sufficient to that most coveted end. Meantime +Austria was to face and resist the Russian +attack, to allow Germany the necessary time to +settle victoriously the western part of the campaign, +so cleverly planned and successfully carried +out, before transferring her glorious legions to the +Eastern theatre of the war. Russia was not supposed +to be able to properly organize her armies in +less than many months, when it could no longer +expect to triumph over the enthusiastic Huns.</p> + +<p>In the depressing darkness of those anxious +days, the great Marne victory came like the brilliant +sun piercing the heavy clouds, pledging final +success as the reward of the persevering courage +and heroism to be long displayed to deserve it. +Germany's first dream of conquering universal +domination by military operations even overshadowing +those of the illustrious Napoleonic +Era, and of Cæsar's marvellously laid deep foundations<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[108]</a></span> +of Roman grandeur, was shattered to +pieces.</p> + +<p>Before the Teutonic armies could be reorganized +for another great offensive, England's forces +and those of her Colonies would be in a position +to enter the struggle; France's resources would be +brought to bear with all their strength; Italy +would break away from the Central Empires and +heartily join the Allies.</p> + +<p>Then the conflict turned to that weary trench +fighting which to the sadness of its trials added +new evidence of the inevitable lengthening of the +war. No wonder that the longing for peace was +intensified under the pressure of conditions becoming +more and more trying. Without doubt all +true friends of human prosperity and happiness, +in their limited possible worldly measure, were fervently +praying to God in favour of the restoration +of harmony between the warring Nations. But +they saw with undeniable clearness that there +were two essential—sine qua non—conditions to +the peace of the future. To be of any value it must +be <i>Just</i> and <i>Durable</i>. If it could become permanent, +much more the better.</p> + +<p>Unfortunately, outside the legions of the true +friends of an honourable peace, there were found, +in the Allied countries, faint hearted men getting +tired of the worries and sacrifices consequent upon +the prolonged struggle. The moment they began +to show their hands, was the signal for the ultra +Revolutionists of Russia, finally organized into<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[109]</a></span> +the disastrous bolshevikism, for the paid traitors +of France, for the disloyal elements of the British +Empire, to rally around them to set in motion, +with accrued force, a current of opinion clamouring +for peace almost at any price. To quiet this unpatriotic +longing of the disheartened, the political +leaders of the Allies publicly explained their war +aims, positively affirming that their objective was +that <i>Just and Durable</i> peace to which alone they +could and would agree.</p> + +<p>Canada had also her <i>pacifist</i> element. So far +as the French Canadians were concerned, it was, +though small in numbers, almost entirely recruited +in the ranks of the supporters of "<i>Nationalism</i>." +I feel I must explain that our "<i>Nationalism</i>," as it +has been repeatedly propounded, does not in the +least represent the sound views of the very large +majority of my French Canadian countrymen.</p> + +<p>As was to be expected, Mr. Bourassa was +again the outspoken organ of our French Canadian +<i>pacifists</i>. He laid great stress on what he +gave out as a fact: that if peace negotiations were +not at once entered upon and brought to a successful +conclusion, it was on account of the Allies' unreasonable +claims, pointing especially to England's +determination not to surrender her supremacy on +the high seas, to develop more and more what he +termed her <i>imperialism</i> for the purpose of dominating +the world <i>economically</i>.</p> + +<p>In my French work, I strongly took issue with +the views of our <i>pacifists</i> as expressed by their<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[110]</a></span> +leader and their press. Addressing my French +Canadian countrymen on the bounden duties of all +loyal British subjects, it was my ardent purpose +to tell them the plain truth. Writing, as I did, in +1916, I was then, as I had been from the very beginning, +firmly convinced that the conflict would be of +long duration, that it was very wrong—even criminal +if disloyally inspired—for any one to delude +them by vain hopes, or deceive them by false +charges.</p> + +<p>Having some knowledge of military strategy +and tactics, I saw with the clear light of noon day +that, despite the gigantic efforts put forth by the +Allies, and the admirable heroism of their armies—our +Canadian force brilliantly playing its part—final +victory would be attained only by indomitable +perseverance, both of the millions of fighting +men and of the whole Allied nations backing them +to the last with their moral and material support. +That profound conviction of mine I was very +anxious to strongly impress on the minds of my +French-Canadian readers, imploring them not to +be carried away by the "Nationalist" erroneous +pretentions that peace could easily be obtained, if +the Allies would only agree to negotiate. I told +them plainly, what was absolutely true, that the +war aims of Germany were so well known and inadmissible +that there was not the least shadow of +hope that peace negotiations could lead to a reasonable +understanding realizing the two imperious +conditions of <i>Justice and Durability</i> in a settlement<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[111]</a></span> +to which all the Allies were in honour +pledged. I explained to them that it was no use +whatever to be deluded by expectations, however +tempting they might appear, because under the +then conditions of the military situation—time +and events have since brought no favourable +change but quite the reverse—there was not the +slightest chance of an opening for a successful +consideration of the questions to be debated and +settled before the complete cessation of the conflict. +There was only one conclusion to be drawn from +the circumstances of the case, and, however sad to +acknowledge, it was that the fight must be carried +on to a final victorious issue, any weakening of +determination and purpose being sure to bring +about humiliating defeat.</p> + + +<p><span class="smcap">The Only Possible Peace Conditions.</span></p> + +<p>Whenever representatives of the belligerents +shall meet to negotiate for peace, there will of +course be many questions of first class importance +to consider and discuss. But the one which must +overshadow any other and of necessity carry the +day, is that peace must be restored under conditions +that will, if not forever, at least for many +long years, protect Humanity and Civilization +against a recurrence of such a calamity as ambitious +and cruel Germany has criminally imposed +upon the world. I urged my French Canadian +readers to consider seriously how peace due to a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[112]</a></span> +compromise, accepted out of sheer discouragement, +would soon develop into a still more trying +ordeal than the one Canada had willingly and deliberately +undertaken to fight out with the Allies. +I forcibly explained to them that if the present +war did not result in an international agreement +to put an end to the extravagant and ruinous +militarism which, under Prussian terrorism, was +proving to be the curse of almost the whole universe, +all the sacrifices of so many millions of +lives, heroically given, of untold sufferings, of so +much treasures, would have been made in vain if +Germany was allowed to continue a permanent +menace to general tranquillity.</p> + +<p>It was a wonder to me that any one could fail +to understand that an armed peace would be only +a truce during which militarism would be spreading +with increased vigour and strength. It was +evident—and still daily becoming more and more +so—that Germany would only consent to it with +the determination to renew, on a still much larger +scale, her military organization with the purpose +of a more gigantic effort at universal domination.</p> + +<p>Then was it not plain that labouring under the +inevitable necessity of such an international situation, +the Allied nations,—the British Empire as +much as France, the United States and Italy—would +by force be obliged to make the sacrifices +required to maintain their military systems in +such a state of efficiency as to be always ready to +face their ambitious foe with good prospects of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[113]</a></span> +success. Such being the undeniable case, I affirmed—I +am sure with the best of reasons—that +Great Britain could not return to her ante-war +policy of the enlistment of only a small standing +territorial army, trusting as formerly to her +Naval strength for her defence and the safe maintenance +of her prestige and power. Like all the +continental nations, England would have to incur +the very heavy cost of keeping millions of men +always fully armed.</p> + +<p>I firmly told my French Canadian countrymen +that it was no use deluding themselves with +the "Nationalist" notion that peace being restored +under the above mentioned circumstances, the +British Colonies would not be called upon to share, +with England, the burdens of the extensive military +preparations necessitated for their own +safety as well as for that of Great Britain and the +whole Empire. The very reasons which had +prompted Canada and all her sister Dominions +to intervene in the present war, would surely induce +them to cooperate with the Mother Country +to maintain a highly and costly state of military +preparedness in order to be ever ready for any +critical emergency.</p> + +<p>Could it be believed that after the sad experience +of the actual conflict, the Allied nations—Great +Britain perhaps more than any other—would +blindly once again run the risk of being +caught napping and deceived by an unscrupulous +and hypocritical enemy, unsufficiently prepared<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[114]</a></span> +to at once rise in their might to fight for their very +national existence and the safety of Mankind +against tyrannical absolutism. If such abominable +pages of History as those that for the last +four years are written with the blood of millions +of heroes defending Human Freedom were, by +fear of new sacrifices, allowed to be repeated, +shame would be on the supposed civilized world +having fallen so low as to bow to the dictates of +barbarism. Let all truly hearted men hope and +pray that no such dark days shall again be the +fearful lot of Humanity. Let them all resolve +that if the world can at last emerge free from the +present hurricane, they will not permit, out of +weakness and despondency, the sweeping waves of +teutonism to submerge Civilization and destroy +the monuments of the work of centuries of the +Christian Art.</p> + +<p>After showing the dark side of the picture, +and what would be the fearful consequences of a +German victory, or of an armed peace pending the +renewal, with still much increased vigour and resources, +of the conflict only suspended, I explained +to my French Canadian readers the great advantages +to be derived by all, Germany included, from +the restoration of peace carrying with it the untold +benefits to be derived from the cessation of +extravagant military organization, yearly destroying +the capital created by hard work and the +saving of the millions of the working populations. +If an international agreement could be arrived at<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[115]</a></span> +by which militarism would be reduced to the requirements +of the maintenance of interior order +and the safeguarding of conventional peace +amongst the Powers, then many long years of +material prosperity, in all its diversity of beneficial +development, would surely follow. Canada, +like the other British Colonies, would not have to +incur any very large expenditure for military purposes, +devoting all her energies to the intelligent +building of the grand future which her immense +territorial resources would certainly make, not +only possible, but sure.</p> + +<p>How much could material development be +conducive to intellectual, moral and religious progress, +if the Nations of the Earth would only sincerely +and permanently abide by the Divine teachings +of Christianity.</p> + +<p>Considering all the conditions of the military +situation, at the end of the summer of 1916, I +clearly perceived the imperious necessity of the +Allies—Canada as well as all her associates—to +fight to a finish. That duty I did my best to impress +on the minds of the French Canadians. +Events have since developed in many ways, but +they all tend to strengthen the conviction that ultimate +victory will only be the price of unshaken +perseverance, of undaunted courage, of more +patriotic sacrifices.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[116]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XV.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Just And Unjust Wars.</span></h3> + + +<p>In one of his pamphlets Mr. Bourassa favoured +his readers with his views on the justice and injustice +of war. He affirmed that a Government +could rightly declare war only for the three +following objects:—</p> + +<p> +1.—For the defence of their own country.<br /> +2.—To fulfill the obligations to which they are<br /> +<span style="margin-left: 2em;">in honour bound towards other nations.</span><br /> +3.—To defend a weak nation unjustly attacked.<br /> +</p> + +<p>I have no hesitation to acknowledge the +soundness of those principles, as theoretically laid +down. I took the "Nationalist" leader at his own +word, wondering more than ever how he could +refuse to admit the justice of the cause of the +Allies.</p> + +<p>Looking at the case from the British standpoint, +was it not clear as the brightest shining of +the sun that England had gone to war against +Germany for the three reasons assigned by Mr. +Bourassa as those which alone can justify a +Government entering a military struggle.</p> + +<p>Great Britain was by solemn treaties in honour +bound to the defence of Belgium whose territory<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[117]</a></span> +had been violated by Germany, the other +party to those treaties which she threw to the +winds contemptuously calling them "<i>scraps of +paper</i>."</p> + +<p>Even outside of all treaty obligations, it was +England's duty, according to the third principle +enunciated by Mr. Bourassa as authorizing a just +declaration of war, to rush to the defense of Belgium, +a <i>"weak nation" most dastardly attacked by +the then strongest military Power on earth</i>.</p> + +<p>The British Government, being responsible +for the safety of the British Empire, would have +been recreant to their most sacred duty, had they +failed to see that if the German armies were freely +allowed to overrun Belgium, to crush France and +vanquish Russia, Great Britain and her Colonies, +unprepared for any effective resistance as they +would have been, had they remained the passive +onlookers of the teutonic conquest of continental +Europe, would have been the easy prey of the barbarous +conquerors. Consequently, in accepting +the bold challenge of the Berlin Government, that +of England also did their duty for the defence of +Great Britain and the British Empire.</p> + +<p>But the whole British Empire being at war +with Germany for the three above enumerated +causes combined, were the free autonomous Colonies +of England not also in duty bound to help +her in vindicating her honour and theirs, and to +do their utmost to support the Mother Country in +her efforts to oblige the Berlin Authorities to respect<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[118]</a></span> +their treaty obligations! Were they not +also in duty bound to participate with England in +the defence of invaded weak, but heroic, Belgium! +Were they not in duty bound to at once organize +for their own defence, sending their heroic sons +to fight their enemy on the soil of France, instead +of waiting the direct attack upon their own +territories!</p> + +<p>The British Parliament dealing exclusively +with the Foreign Affairs of the Empire, the international +treaties which they ratify are binding on +the whole Empire. If such a treaty is violated by +the other party or parties who signed it, violently +obliging England to stand by her obligations, are +not the Colonies also bound to uphold the Mother +land in the vindication of her treaty rights?!</p> + +<p>Looking at the same question, in the full +light of the sound principles of the justice of any +war, from the German standpoint, what are the +only true conclusions to be drawn? To satisfy +Austria's unjust demands and maintain peace, +Servia had, in 1914, at the urgent request of +England, France and Russia, gone as far as any +independent nation could go without dishonour. +Not only backed, but no doubt inspired, by the +Berlin Government, Austria would not consent to +reduce by an iota her unfair pretentions against +Servia.</p> + +<p>It was plainly a case of a great Power unjustly +threatening a weak nation. Consequently, +according to the "Nationalist" leader's principle,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[119]</a></span> +Russia was right and doing her duty in intervening +to protect the menaced weak State. Instead of +hypocritically resenting Russia's intervention in +favour of Servia, it was equally Germany's duty to +join with her to save this weak nation from Austrian +unjust challenge. Had it done so, Austria +would certainly have refrained from exacting from +Servia concessions to which she could not agree +without sacrificing her independent Sovereignty. +The Vienna Authorities backing down from their +unjust stand, there would have been no war. And +Germany, together with Russia, would have deserved +the gratitude of the world for their timely +intervention, prompted by a clear sense of their +duty and a sound conception of their international +right.</p> + +<p>It is well known how the very opposite took +place. Russia, to be ready for the emergency of +the declaration of war by Austria against Servia, +ordered the mobilization of that part of her army +bordering on the Austrian frontier, answering to +the Berlin request for explanations that she had no +inimical intention whatever against the German +Empire, that her only object was to protect weak +Servia against Austria's most unjust attack. The +Kaiser's government replied by requesting Russia +to cancel her order for the mobilization of part of +her army. And in the very thick of this diplomatic +exchange of despatches, whilst England and +France were sparing no effort, by day and night, +to maintain peace and protect Mankind from the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[120]</a></span> +threatening calamity, Germany suddenly threw +the gauntlet and declared war against Russia.</p> + +<p>Foreseeing clearly that France was consequently +in honour bound to support Russia, in accordance +with her international obligations towards +that great Eastern Power—in strict conformity +with the second principle enunciated by +Mr. Bourassa and previously quoted—, Germany +took the initiative of a second unjust declaration +of war, and this one against France.</p> + +<p>The military operations against France being +very difficult, and certainly to be very costly in a +fearful loss of man-power, before the strongly fortified +French frontier could be successfully overrun, +Germany, after a most shameful attempt to +bribe England into neutrality, decided to take the +easy route and ordered her army to invade Belgium's +neutral territory, in violation of her solemn +treaty obligations. That treacherous act filled +the cup of teutonic infamy, and brought Great +Britain, and the whole British Empire, into the +conflict.</p> + +<p>So Germany was guilty of the most outrageous +violation of the three sound principles laid +down by the "Nationalist" leader qualifying a just +war against an iniquitous one, whilst England and +France won the admiration of the world by their +noble determination to stand by them at all cost.</p> + +<p>Still Mr. Bourassa, by an incomprehensible +perversion of mind in judging the application of +his own loudly proclaimed principles, has not to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[121]</a></span> +this day uttered one word openly condemning Germany's +war policy and eulogizing that of England +and France. On the contrary, he has tried to persuade +his readers that both groups of belligerents +were equally responsible for the war, more especially +giving vent to his, at the least, very +strange hostility to England and scarcely dissimulating +his teutonic evident sympathies. He +never positively expressed his disapproval of Austria's +unjust attack against Servia, but condemned +Russia for her intervention to protect that +weak country, concluding that the Petrograd Government +was the real guilty party which had +thrown the world into the vortex of the most deadly +conflict of all times.</p> + +<p>One of the most damaging and unfair arguments +of Mr. Bourassa was that in intervening +in the struggle, England was not actuated by a +real sentiment of justice, honour and duty, but was +merely using France as a shield for her own selfish +protection. And when he deliberately expressed +such astounding views, he knew, or ought +to have known, that by her so commendable decision +to avenge outraged weak Belgium, Great +Britain had at once, by her command of the seas, +guaranteed France against the superior strength +of the German fleet, kept widely opened the great +commercial avenues of oceanic trade, the closing +of which by the combined sea power of the Central +Empires, would have infallibly caused the +crushing defeat of France by cutting off all the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[122]</a></span> +supplies she absolutely required to meet the terrible +onslaught of her cruel enemy. He knew, or +ought to have known, that the navigation of the +seas being closed to her rivals by Germany, Russia +would have been very easily put out of the +fight, her only available ocean ports, Vladivostock +and Arkhangel, through which supplies of many +kinds, especially munitions, could reach her eastern +coast, at once becoming of no service to her.</p> + +<p>He knew, or ought to have known, that if +Great Britain had remained neutral, Japan, Italy, +Portugal, would not have declared war against +either Germany or Austria.</p> + +<p>As such consequences of British neutrality +were as sure as the daily rising of the sun, was I +not right when I drew the conclusion that if a +shield there was, it was rather that of Great Britain +covering France, all her allies and even the +neutral nations, with the protection of her mighty +sea power. With such a conviction, the soundness +of which I felt sure, I told my French Canadian +countrymen that, for one, I would, to my last day, +be heartily grateful to England to have saved +France from the crushing defeat which once more +would have been her lot, had she been left alone +to fight the Central Empires. Heroic, without +doubt France would have been. But with deficient +supplies, with much curtailed resources, with no +helpful friends, heroism alone, however admirable +and prolonged, was sure to be of no avail against +an unmatched materially organized power, used to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[123]</a></span> +its most efficiency by the severest military discipline, +by national fanaticism worked to fury, and +by soldierly enthusiasm carried to wildness.</p> + +<p>In a single handed struggle with Germany, in +1914, France would have been in a far worse position +than in 1870. The extraordinary development +of the new German Empire—the outcome of the +great war so disastrous to France—in population, +in commerce, in manufacturing industry, in +financial resources, in military organization, made +her fighting power still more disproportionate. +To her wonderful territorial army, she added her +recently built military fleet, then much superior, +in the number of vessels carrying thousands and +thousands of skilled seamen, to the French one. +Moreover Austria, with another fifty millions of +people, Bulgaria and Turkey, with more than +thirty millions, were backing Germany, whilst, in +1870, France had only Prussia to contend with.</p> + +<p>All those facts staring him like any one else, +how could Mr. Bourassa reasonably charge Great +Britain with using France merely as a tool for her +own safety. Under the circumstances of the case, +such a preposterous assertion is beyond human +comprehension. I, for one, cannot understand +how he failed to see that, had England been actuated +by the selfish and unworthy motives to which +he ascribes her intervention in the war, she could +have then, and at least for several years, wrought +from Germany almost all the concessions she +would have wished for. Could it not, by an alliance<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[124]</a></span> +with the Central Empires, have attained +the goal of that dominating ambition which the +"Nationalist" leader asserts to be her most +cherished aim.</p> + +<p>But such a dishonourable policy England +would not consider for a single moment. She indignantly +refused Germany's outrageous proposals, +stood by her treaty obligations, and resolutely +threw all the immense resources of her power in +the conflict which, at the very beginning, developed +into a struggle for life and death between +human freedom and absolutist tyranny.</p> + +<p>I am sure, and I do not hesitate to vouch for +them, all the truly loyal French-Canadians—they +are almost unanimously so—are like myself profoundly +grateful to Great Britain for her noble +decision to rush to the defense of Belgium and +France in their hour of need. Comparing what +took place with what might have been, moved by +all the ties of affection that will ever bind them +to the great and illustrious nation from which they +sprung, they fully appreciate the inestimable value +of the support given by their second mother-country +to that of their national origin. They ardently +pray that both of them will emerge victorious +from the great conflict to remain, for the good +of Mankind, indissolubly united in peace as they +are in war.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[125]</a></span></p> + + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">A "Nationalist" Illogical Charge Against +England.</span></div> + +<p>Our Nationalists, after charging England +with using France merely as a shield against +Germany, have been illogical to the point of reproaching +her for not having intervened in favour +of her close neighbour, in 1870. It is most likely +that, had she done so, they would have pretended +that she would have been actuated by the same +selfish sentiment that prompted her, for the only +sake of her own protection, to enter into the +present conflict.</p> + +<p>How is it that Mr. Bourassa, so fond of +charging England with ambitious views of constant +self-agrandizement, of worldly domination, +can suddenly turn about and accuse her of having +shamefully sacrificed France, in 1870, to the overpowering +German blow?</p> + +<p>The circumstances of the two cases—1870 and +1914—were very different. The conflict of 1870 +had, apparently at least, a dynastic cause. The +House of Hohenzollern had been intriguing to have +a Prussian prince of her own elevated to the +Spanish Throne. The Imperial Government of +Napoleon III strongly objected to such a policy. +The diplomatic correspondence which ensued did +not settle the difficulty. France declared war +against Prussia. Many years later it was discovered +that by a falsified diplomatic despatch, +Bismark had succeeded in his satanic design to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[126]</a></span> +bring the government of Napoleon III to attack +Prussia, thus shamefully throwing upon France +the responsibility of the war.</p> + +<p>In 1870, England was at peace with all the +European Powers, as she had ever been since 1815, +with the only exception of the Crimean War. +During the diplomatic correspondence that led to +the hostilities, what reason would have justified +England to break her neutrality? What would +the present critics of her course have said if she +had sided with Prussia? Would they have pretended +that she would have used Prussia as a +shield against France?</p> + +<p>I personally remember very well the tragic +events of the terrible year, 1870. The crushing +military power of Prussia as proved by the triumphant +march of her victorious armies, was a revelation +for all, for France still more than for others. +True Prussia had beaten Austria in the short campaign +ended at Sadowa. The Prussia France was +then fighting was not the giant Empire against +which she is battling with such heroism for the +last four years. France was at the time the leading +continental Power. The general opinion was, +when war was suddenly declared, that France +would easily triumph over her enemy.</p> + +<p>It must not be forgotten that, in 1870, England +was even less ready than in 1914 to engage in a +continental conflict. Her standing army was not +large, and then partly garrisoned in the colonies. +Some of her best regiments were stationed in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[127]</a></span> +Canada. She could have been a really important +ally of France only as a strong support of another +continental power joining with her against +Prussia, for instance Russia or Austria, or both of +them.</p> + +<p>If England had been able to send 500,000 men +in a few days to the very heart of France, incessantly +followed by another half million, it is almost +certain that the Prussian army would not +have entered Paris. But England had not that +million of trained men. It would have taken at +least a year to organize such a large army.</p> + +<p>I will speak my mind openly. After Sedan, +any attempt at saving France by force would have +been vain and useless. Even Russia and Austria +were unprepared for such a task. Their intervention, +coming too late, would most likely have given +Prussia a chance to win a much greater victory. +France out of the struggle, Prussia would then +have had the opportunity to achieve, as early as +1870, what she has ever since prepared for, and +tried to accomplish by the war she has brought on +in 1914.</p> + +<p>What then becomes of the "Nationalist" pretention +that Great Britain has ever been aiming +at dominating the world, when it is so easy to +understand that without a very large territorial +army, which she persistingly refused to organize, +she was unable to take an important part in any +continental war. The days were passed, after the +extraordinary development of Prussian militarism,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[128]</a></span> +when she could brilliantly hold her own on the +continent with a small standing army backed by +generous subsidies to the European powers. The +present war is surely proof evident of it, since +England, instead of the two hundred thousand men +she was expected to send over to France, as her +man-power contribution, has had to raise a total +army, with all the auxiliary services, of 6,000,000 +officers and men, exclusive of the 2,000,000 contributed +by the whole British Colonial Empire.</p> + +<p>The Nationalists accusing England to have +abandoned France to her sad fate, in 1870, was +only another instance of their campaign to arouse +the feelings of the French Canadians against +Great Britain.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">Other "Nationalist" Erroneous Assertions.</span></div> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa has had his own peculiar way +of explaining the real determining cause of the +war. Some men are—by nature it is to be supposed—always +disposed to judge great historical +events from considerations inspired by the lowest +sentiments of the human heart. In the "Nationalist" +leader's view, the great war was brought +about by the treacherous alliance of British and +German capitalists speculating together, in actual +partnership or otherwise, in the production of war +material: cannons, rifles, munitions, war shipbuilding, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[129]</a></span>&c.</p> + +<p>In my humble opinion, such views are lowering +to a very vulgar and lamentably repulsive +cause—if it could be true—events of immense significance, +the result, on the one side, of criminal +aspirations which, however guilty they may be, +have not yet been degraded to the profound depth +of abjection they suppose; on the other, by the +most noble sentiments which can inspire nations +to make the greatest sacrifices to avenge outraged +Justice and Right.</p> + +<p>Autocratic German ambition, such as it has +proved to be, is bad enough. Still the cause of the +war, such as asserted by Mr. Bourassa, would have +been far worse. National aspirations, however +wrongly diverted from their legitimate conception, +will never be as contemptible as the nasty greed of +individual speculators treacherously sucking the +very life blood of their countrymen for the sake of +squeezing millions of dollars at the cost of their +country's honour and future.</p> + +<p>Unfortunately, illegitimate "profiteering" has +taken place in the course of every war. Of course +it must be severely condemned and firmly prevented, +to the utmost, by governmental authority +strongly supported by public opinion which +must, however, be cautious not to be unduly influenced +and carried away by the wild charges of +some who denounce others with so much apparent +indignation for the only reason that they themselves +are not succeeding as they would like to do +in their speculative attempts.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[130]</a></span></p> + +<p>Illegitimate "profiteering" is one of the deplorable +effects of a war; it is never its real cause.</p> + +<p>What are the true causes, humanly speaking, +of the cataclysm so violently shaking the world? +They were of two kinds. The first was the disordered +ambition of a nation having reached, by +prodigious efforts, such a power that she fatally +determined to dominate everywhere, militarily +and politically. To this first cause was added that +of secular race rivalry.</p> + +<p>The two causes of the first kind—which can +properly be called <i>offensive</i>, were followed by the +noble one of the resistance to oppression, of the +defence of the honour of threatened nations, of the +energetic determination to avenge violated international +treaties, and to save the civilized world +from a new barbarous invasion.</p> + +<p>If the Allies had humbly bowed to the odious +German claims, there would have been no war.</p> + +<p>Consequently, the two evident causes of the +war are, on the one hand, German ambition to +universal domination; on the other, the absolute +necessity on the part of the Allies to prevent by +all possible means the success of such a tyrannical +enterprise.</p> + +<p>However much guilty they have been in bringing +on the most terrible war of all times, it is still +injurious for the Berlin Government to suppose +that in assuming this weighty responsibility, they +were playing the part of an unconscious instrument +of the most diabolical thirst of money making +by shameless "profiteers."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[131]</a></span></p> + +<p>But such a charge is absolutely inexplicable +when one accuses France, England and Belgium +to be, in their admirable and heroic campaign for +the world's deliverance and freedom, the pliant +tools of contemptible speculators in the production +of war materials.</p> + +<p>Governments and nations are, as a rule, far +from having dropped to such a low state of incurable +corruption. For many of them, there yet +exists bright summits, shining with the clear light +of Justice, Right and Honour, which in those +times of sufferings and burning tears, are the +pledge of better days and the promise of the +world's resurrection.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">Incredible "Nationalist" Notions.</span></div> + +<p>Can it be possibly believed that the "Nationalist" +leader has asserted that when the British +capitalists and bankers invested the savings entrusted +to their safe keeping, they were principally +actuated by the desire to create in Canada a financial +influence which would, in due course, assist +with force in dragging the Dominion to participate +in the Imperial wars against her better judgment? +Yet, so he has positively written and developed the +wild argument.</p> + +<p>Any man, with the slightest business experience, +knows that, in all cases, would-be borrowers +go where money is to be lent. I have not yet +learned that one of them ever went to the North<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[132]</a></span> +Pole in search of millions for railway building +and all kinds of industrial and commercial enterprises. +Daring explorers who ventured thither, +facing so many risks, were stimulated by a laudable +thirst of fame and the desire of scientific progress. +They did not imagine, for a moment, that +they were likely to discover, in these far away +regions, great financial markets amply provided +with millions of accumulated capital waiting for +safe and profitable investments.</p> + +<p>Canada, a young country, as large as all +Europe in territorial extent, with wonderful undeveloped +resources of the agricultural soil, of the +mines, of immense forests, of mighty rivers, of +large and breezy lakes, could not progress without +labour and capital. The large natural increase +of the population, supplemented by immigration, +was sure to supply the labour. Capital, to the +amount of hundreds of millions, could not be provided +by the only savings of our people. Immigration +of capital was even more pressingly required +than that of men. The Governments of +Canada, federal and provincial, city corporations, +railway companies, industrial concerns, wanting +money, all went where it could be found. It happened +that London, the capital of the British Empire, +was by far the largest financial market of the +world. No wonder then that instead of going to +Lapland, Canadian borrowers crowded in London, +where they met with those of nearly all the nations +of the world, gathering in the same city for the +same purpose.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">[133]</a></span></p> + +<p>Two incontrovertible economical truisms are, +without the shadow of a doubt, the following:—</p> + +<p>1. That a would-be borrower wishes to get +the money he wants in the easiest way at the lowest +interest charge;</p> + +<p>2. That a wise lender wishes to secure for +his money the safest investment carrying the highest +possible rate of interest; the rate of interest +being however subordinated, in his mind, to the +safety of the investment.</p> + +<p>Such were the sound economical considerations +which settled for the Canadian borrowers of +all sorts, and the British investors, the conditions +of all the loans made on Canadian account.</p> + +<p>Any one merely hinting to the British saving +public that the money invested in Canada was sent +over to our shores for the object of creating a financial +influence which would force the Dominion +into costly wars, could not have adopted a more +unwise course to destroy the best chances of the +success of a loan. Canadian credit was of first +class order, because the British investors knew our +grand possibilities; because they were aware that +Canada had always been a safe debtor, honouring +with clock regularity her interest charges and the +payment of maturing loans; because also, and in a +very large measure, they realized that we were not +in the same position of so many nations of the Old +World, exposed to frequent warring necessities +likely to exhaust our means and to jeopardize our +bright prospects.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[134]</a></span></p> + +<p>Confidence being the sound basis of good credit, +we got all the money we wanted for all the +purposes of our national economical development, +the true interest of Canada and of Great Britain +being equally well served by the financial intercourse +between the wealthy mother-country and +her progressive colony.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">Canadian Financial Operations in the United +States.</span></div> + +<p>Our "Nationalists," so eager to discourage +Canadian effort in the war, and, with this object, +always prone to magnify German warlike achievements +and the difficulties confronting the Allies, +were rather nervous at the increasing prospects of +the United States joining the <i>Entente</i> Nations. +Their leader seized every opportunity to argue +that they would be mistaken in doing so. During +the weary months when the President of the +neighbouring Republic was prudently feeling his +way before taking the bold stand which he has +ever since so brilliantly and bravely upheld, the +"Nationalists", through successive ups and downs +in their expectations, could scarcely help hiding +their desire that the United States would not intervene +in the struggle. Those of us who had not +been moved by the horrors of the Belgian invasion, +by the murder of so many innocent victims of +teutonic savageness, by the brutal killing of Edith +Cavell, by the Armenian massacres, by the wanton<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[135]</a></span> +destruction of admirable works of Art, could not +be expected to thrill at the barbarous sinking of +the Lusitania, sending to the bottom of the ocean +hundreds of American citizens of the neutral American +Northern Republic. They were anxious that +the Washington Government should condone the +outrageous offence and all the subsequent ones perpetrated +by the German submarines against our +neighbours. How much they were dismayed at +the sudden close of Mr. Wilson's apparent hesitation, +and at the proud declaration of war from +Washington to Berlin. Though rejoicing at it, +they did not consider that the Russian bolsheviki's +collapse could compensate for the additional military +and financial resources the Allies were sure to +derive from the United States participation in the +war.</p> + +<p>Canada having to borrow many millions to +sustain her warlike effort, and the British money +market being closed to further outside investments, +had two sources left for her successful financial +operations: her own market and that of the +United States. The Washington Authorities had +generously decided to help financially the European +Allies in pressing need of money. The Ottawa +Government, before making a grand appeal +to the Canadian public, applied to Washington for +a loan. Mr. Wilson's cabinet, however much they +would have liked to meet the wishes of the Canadian +Government, had to answer that, having such +a large war expenditure to incur, and such big<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[136]</a></span> +sums to collect to assist their less wealthy European +associates in the struggle, they could not see +their way to grant Canada's demand.</p> + +<p>Acknowledging the value of the reasons given +for not complying with their request, the Canadian +Ministers then applied to Washington for the permission +to negotiate a loan in the open American +market. This was readily granted.</p> + +<p>It was, of course, well understood that going +in the open market, Canada, to secure the required +sum of money, would have to pay the then current +rate of interest increasing, as usual, in proportion +to the increased pressure of the demand of funds.</p> + +<p>It is utterly incredible—but still it is true—that +Mr. Bourassa did denounce in his newspaper +<i>Le Devoir</i>, the Ottawa Cabinet's action in borrowing +money from the American saving public. In +severe terms he blamed the Washington Authorities +for not having lent millions to Canada at the +low rate of interest they had agreed to accept from +France and Italy. He asserted that this refusal +on their part was a testimony of ill-will against +the Dominion. And in the most violent terms he +charged all those who favoured Canadian borrowings +in the American market with being traitors +selling their country to the United States.</p> + +<p>It is hard to say whether the charge is not +more ridiculous than contemptible. It is the repetition, +in an aggravated form of absurdity, of +the argument accusing the British investing capitalists +to have had for their only object in lending<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[137]</a></span> +us their money to help coercing Canada into the +Imperial wars.</p> + +<p>Was Mr. Bourassa ignorant of the fact that +the building of the magnificent railway system of +the United States, that their great industrial development, +were due to the billions of British +capital which for the last eighty years have +flowed, in rolling waves, towards the shores of the +Republic, invading, in the most peaceful and +friendly way, her large territory, and drawing +from its immense resources the greatest immeasurable +accumulation of wealth ever created by the +labour of man? I am not aware that any American +writer ever ran the risk of being crushed by ridicule +in accusing all the United States borrowers +in the English market, governmental and others, +of the hideous crime of selling their country to +Great Britain. It would have been sheer madness +to say so in the broad light of the marvellous economical +progress of our neighbours. They knew +very well that the billions of dollars invested by +the British saving public for the development of +their territorial riches, were producing returns +much larger than the rate of interest paid to their +British creditors.</p> + +<p>No one in the United States ever apprehended, +for a single moment, that because the Republic had +borrowed enormous sums from Great Britain, she +was likely to lose her State independence through +the financial influence of the holders of her securities +of all sorts.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[138]</a></span></p> + +<p>Such "Nationalist" notions, as above exposed +and contradicted, can only create very wrong and +deplorable conclusions in the public mind, were +they allowed to follow their course without +challenge and without the refutation proving their +complete absurdity.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[139]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XVI.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">"Nationalist" Views Condensed.</span></h3> + + +<p>After refuting at length the "Nationalist" +theories, I thought proper to condense them in a +concrete proposition, and challenge their propagandist +to call a public meeting in any city, town, +or locality, in the Dominion,—Montreal for instance—and +to find a dozen of citizens of standing +in the community, to consent to move and second +a "<i>Resolution</i>" embodying their doctrines.</p> + +<p>This condensed proposition, I translate as +follows:—</p> + +<p>"Whereas England has unjustly declared war +against Germany;</p> + +<p>"Whereas Great Britain has done nothing to +maintain the peace of the world;</p> + +<p>"Considering that His Majesty King George +V. <i>had not the right to declare the state of war +for Canada without the assent of the Canadian +Cabinet</i>;</p> + +<p>"Considering that Canada, as an autonomous +colony, <i>is a Sovereign State</i>;</p> + +<p>"Considering that British Sovereignty over +Canada <i>is only a fiction</i>;</p> + +<p>"Considering that Canada, interfering in the +present war, <i>should have done so as a Nation</i>;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">[140]</a></span></p> + +<p>"Whereas Canada should only have fought on +her own account, like <i>Belgium, Servia, Italy or +Bulgaria</i>.</p> + +<p>"Whereas <i>the maintenance of a compact British +Empire is the most permanent provocation +against the peace of the world</i>;</p> + +<p>"Considering that the supremacy of England +on the seas is unjust;</p> + +<p>"Considering that Great Britain's aspiration, +for a long time past, has been universal domination +by means of her military naval power;</p> + +<p>"Whereas England is unfair against France +in using her as a shield against German invasion;</p> + +<p>"Considering that England is exercising by +all possible means a strong pressure upon the +Colonies for her only benefit;</p> + +<p>"Considering <i>that all the social leaders have +united to demoralize the conscience of the people, +to poison their mind, to set their vigilance at +sleep, and to represent to them as a national duty +what would formerly have been considered as a +betrayal of national interests</i>;</p> + +<p>"Considering <i>that England is trying to crush +Germany, being afraid of her colonial expansion +and her maritime and commercial competition</i>;</p> + +<p>"Whereas our compatriots of the British +races have many faults; <i>that they are ignorant, +assuming, arrogant, overbearing and rotten with +mercantilism</i>;</p> + +<p>"Considering that they have acquired <i>many +of the worst vices of the Yankees</i>;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[141]</a></span></p> + +<p>"Considering that Canada should never participate, +outside of her own territory, in the wars +of the British Empire;</p> + +<p>"Considering that the Canadian Cabinet and +Parliament are criminally guilty of having ordered +the organization of a Canadian army to go +and fight against Germany on the French territory, +and in authorizing the payment of the cost +of this military expedition;</p> + +<p>"Be it "Resolved", that this meeting energetically +protest against the declaration of war +against Germany by His Majesty King George V, +<i>without the assent of the Canadian Cabinet</i>, to +defend Belgium's territory invaded by Germany +violating solemn treaties;</p> + +<p>"That this meeting is of opinion that, for the +purpose of favouring the restoration of peace as +soon as possible, England should notify all the +Powers that she abdicates for ever her supremacy +on the seas, which supremacy Germany could +hereafter safely exercise;</p> + +<p>"That this meeting being absolutely convinced +that <i>the maintenance of a compact British Empire +is the most permanent provocation against +the peace of the world</i>, is strongly of opinion that +Great Britain should, in order to quiet the fears +of the Nations friendly to peace and opposed to +militarism, like pacifist Germany, dissolve her +Empire, at once acknowledging the immediate +independence of India and of all her autonomous +Colonies;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[142]</a></span></p> + +<p>"That this meeting's formal opinion is that +the Canadian Parliament's imperious duty is to +order without delay the dissolution of the British +bond of connection, <i>which would be a public benefit</i>, +and to proclaim the immediate independence +of Canada;</p> + +<p>"That a copy of the present "Resolution" be addressed +to His Excellency the Governor General, +to the Members of the Federal Cabinet, to the +Senators and to the Members of the House of +Commons."</p> + +<p>The italics in the above draft "Resolution" +and "Preamble" are quoted from Mr. Bourassa's +writings.</p> + +<p>The "Preamble" and "Resolution" emphasize, +in their true and complete meaning, the "Nationalist" +doctrines perseveringly propounded for years +past to poison French Canadian mentally. That +such teachings can only produce disloyal feelings, +stir up national prejudices and hatred of the +Mother Country, and be most detrimental to the +best interests of the Province of Quebec, of the +Dominion of Canada, and of the British Empire as +a whole, every one must admit with sadness.</p> + +<p>My challenge, which is still maintained, has +not been taken up yet. All may rest assured that it +will never be. The most ardent "Nationalist" +knows that no responsible citizens would move the +adoption of such views.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">[143]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XVII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Loyal Principles Propounded.</span></h3> + + +<p>To the foregoing "Nationalist" proposition, I +opposed one condensing, in a concrete form, the +views and principles of the truly loyal Canadian +citizens. I also translate it as follows:—</p> + +<p>"Whereas, since 1870, the German Empire had +been a permanent menace against the peace of the +world by her threatening military policy;</p> + +<p>"Whereas England, throughout the same +period, and more especially during the twenty +years previous to 1914, had done her utmost efforts +to maintain peace;</p> + +<p>"Considering that Great Britain had, in many +ways, solicited Germany to agree to the limitation +of armaments, especially of the building of +war vessels;</p> + +<p>"Considering that she had persisted in her attempts +with the German Government to save the +nations from the ruinous system of excessive +armaments, in spite of the latter's refusal to +accede to her demands;</p> + +<p>"Considering that though in honor bound, +like England, by three solemn treaties, to respect +Belgium's neutrality, the German Government +have, in August 1914, ordered their army to violate<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">[144]</a></span> +Belgian territory in order to more easily +invade France to which they had declared war;</p> + +<p>"Whereas Great Britain, in honour bound, +could not permit the crushing of Belgium by the +German Empire;</p> + +<p>"Considering, moreover, that Germany, after +mutilating and destroying Belgium, by the deprivation +of her independence, after triumphing +over France which she would have once again dismembered, +would have undertaken to beat England +to deprive her of sea supremacy, in order to +obtain, by this last conquest, her domination over +Europe and almost all the world;</p> + +<p>"Considering that the defeat of England might +very likely have resulted in the cession of Canada +to Germany;</p> + +<p>"Considering that the world at large is greatly +interested in the maintenance of England and +France as first class Powers on account of their +services in favour of Human Civilization and +Liberty;</p> + +<p>"Considering that the German armies have +accompanied their military operations with untold +barbarous acts, by the murder of priests, of +peaceful citizens, of wounded soldiers, of religious +women, of mothers, of previously criminally +outraged young girls, of old men, of young +children, with the destruction by fire and otherwise +of Cathedrals, Churches,—monuments of +the Christian Art,—of libraries—sanctuaries of +Science—of historical monuments, the legitimate +glory and pride of Human Genius;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">[145]</a></span></p> + +<p>"Whereas the German Government is guilty +of the murder of thousands of persons, men, +women and children, by the sinking of merchant +vessels—the Lusitania, for instance—by its submarine +ships, without giving the notices required +by International Law;</p> + +<p>"Whereas from the very beginning of the war, +the Allied Nations, England, France and Russia, +have jointly agreed, in honour bound, to require, +as the essential peace condition, the cessation by +all the belligerent Powers of the crushing and +ruinous militarism prevailing before the opening +of the hostilities, by the fault of Germany's obstination +to constantly strengthen her military +organization both on land and sea;</p> + +<p>"Considering that England and her Allies are +struggling for the most venerable and sacred +cause:—<i>outraged Justice</i>—; that, being a British +Colony, <i>Canada is justly engaged in the present +cruel and deplorable conflict, for the defence +of the Right and the true Liberty of Nations; that +our Canadian soldiers are valiantly fighting with +those of England, France and Belgium for the +great cause of sovereign importance—the protection +of the world threatened by Germanism</i>;</p> + +<p>"Considering that England, to which the political +life of Canada is bound, and France, to +which the French Canadians owe their national +existence, <i>have to fight for sacred interests in a +war of endurance</i> requiring the incessant renewal +of all the energies of the most ardent patriotism,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">[146]</a></span> +the victims of which falling on the field of honour +have the merit of giving their lives <i>for Justice</i>";</p> + +<p>"Considering that, though wishing the restoration +of peace as soon as possible, and earnestly +praying Divine Providence to favour the world +with the blessings of peace, more and more urgently +needed after this assault of abominable +barbarism against Christian Civilization lasting +for the last four years, the Allies are absolutely +unable to terminate the war by giving their consent +to conditions which would not protect +Humanity against the direst consequences of the +militarism fastened by the German Empire on +the Nations so anxious to bring it to an end;</p> + +<p>"Be it "Resolved":—</p> + +<p>"That this meeting approves of the free and +patriotic decision of the Federal Parliament to +have Canada to participate in the so very Just +War which England, France, Belgium, the United +States and Italy are fighting against the German +and Austrian Empires, allied in an effort to +dominate the world;</p> + +<p>"That this meeting's strong opinion is that, on +account of the terrible crisis menacing the British +Empire and Civilization, it was the bounden duty +of Canada to intervene in the war for the safety +of the Mother Country and her own, for the salvation +of Liberty and <i>of the sacred cause of outraged +Justice</i>;</p> + +<p>"That this meeting desires to express her admiration +and profound gratitude for the braves<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">[147]</a></span> +who enlist in the grand army which the Canadian +Parliament has ordered to be organized for the +defence of the cause of the Allies, which is also +that of the civilized world;</p> + +<p>"That this meeting also concur in the opinion +that Canada is in duty bound to continue to participate +in the present war until the final victory +of the Allies, which will guarantee to the world +a lasting peace and put an end to German militarism +which has been the direct cause of so much +dire misfortunes for Humanity."</p> + + +<p>The italics of the above draft "Resolution" +are quoted from the writings and speeches of +leaders of French Canadian Roman Catholics.</p> + +<p>There was no need of calling meetings to +adopt the preceding "Resolution" with its well defined +preamble. It had been approved, in all its +bearings, at the outset of the hostilities by the unanimous +decision of the Canadian Parliament, by +the almost unanimous consent of public opinion, +by the religious, social, commercial, industrial and +financial leaders of the country. It had been so +approved by the four hundred thousand brave +Canadians who rallied to the Colours; by the subscribers, +by thousands, to the national war loans.</p> + +<p>Since writing the above draft "Resolution", +its full substance has been almost unanimously +approved by the Canadian people in general elections, +the two contending political parties entirely +agreeing so far as the Justice of the cause of the +Allies was concerned, differing only as to the best +means for Canada to adopt to achieve final victory.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">[148]</a></span></p> + +<p>Without entering into any considerations respecting +the divergence of the views of the leaders +of political thought, in the still recent electoral +campaign,—from which it is more advisable for +me to abstain in the interest of the cause I am defending—I +may be allowed to remark that only a +small remnant of the "Nationalist" element dared +to reaffirm his hostility to Canada's intervention +in the conflict and to avow his opinion <i>that the +country had done enough</i>.</p> + +<p>What did those irreconcilable "Nationalists"—so +few in numbers as the event ultimately proved—mean +by their assertion that <i>Canada had done +enough for the war</i>? According to its literal wording, +it must have signified that no more sacrifices +should have been incurred for the triumph of the +Allied cause. If it was so, the conclusion to be +drawn from such sayings was that, to put an end +to any further Canadian contributions, orders +should be given to bring back the Canadian Army +from Europe, and to send home all the forces still +on Canadian soil. It is plain that even if the new +Canadian Parliament had decided not to increase +our contribution of man-power, in order to maintain +the efficiency of the Canadian divisions at the +front, large sacrifices would have had to be made +to keep on the theatre of war the forces which were +still in the field.</p> + +<p>To refuse to participate in the war would have +been deserting the flag at the hour of danger, and +a total misconception of our plain duty.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">[149]</a></span></p> + +<p>Giving up the fight, once engaged in the +struggle, before triumphant victory, or irremediable +defeat, in the very thick of the battle so +heroically carried on by the Allies, would have +been sheer cowardice—bolchevikism of the worst +kind.</p> + +<p>Whether they meant it or not, those few +"Nationalists" dared not openly propose the recall +of our troops. The solitary "Nationalist" candidate +who had the nerve to face the electorate was +defeated by a very large majority.</p> + +<p>No better proof of the weakness of the hold of +the doctrines of "Nationalism," on sound public +opinion, is required than the decision of its most +outspoken advocate and leader, Mr. Bourassa, to +refrain from being a candidate in any constituency, +and to advise all his supposed friends to do +likewise. No one was deceived, with regard to this +decision, by the reasons, or rather excuses, given +to explain it.</p> + +<p>Evidently, if the "Nationalist" group and their +leader had been confident of the support of the +large number of electors whose opinion they pretended +to represent, they would certainly not have +lost the chance to show their strength, and the opportunity +to elect many candidates of their persuasion +to enter Parliament free from any party +allegiance but that of their own element. But any +one somewhat posted with the currents of public +opinion in the Province of Quebec, knew very well +that if pure "Nationalist" candidates had been<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">[150]</a></span> +nominated in all the constituencies of the Province, +running between the regular party nominees,—ministerial +and opposition—the average number +of ballots cast for them would scarcely have +reached ten per cent. of the French Canadian +votes, less than two per cent. of the whole Canadian +electorate.</p> + +<p>It was moreover highly probable that, had they +tried the game, they would not have even succeeded, +in two-thirds of the constituencies, in inducing +citizens of sufficient standing to accept their nomination +and their political program. Once engaged +in such a hopeless electoral contest, they +would have had either to humbly retire from the +field, or to await the doomed day by nominating +men of no weight whatever. Both alternatives +would have led them to an equally disastrous +defeat.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">Unjust "Nationalist" Grievances Against +England.</span></div> + +<p>At the end of the very first page of Mr. +Bourassa's pamphlet, entitled:—<i>What do we +owe England</i>?—in French:—Que devons-nous à +l'Angleterre?,—The following lines are found:—(<i>Translation.</i>)</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>British Imperialism, in its concrete and practical form, can +be defined in ten words: <b>the active participation by the Colonies in +the wars of England</b>. It is almost precisely the definition I gave +of it as early as the days of the African war. It is exact. Considered +from a larger point of view, from its profound causes and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">[151]</a></span>far reaching consequences, British Imperialism calls for a more +ample definition. Its object is to have Great Britain dominate the +world by means of the organization and concentration of all the +Military Forces of the Empire—both Sea and Land Forces—; it +means the gradual annihilation, or at least the enslaving of all +the divers nationalities constituting the British Empire, in order +to bring about the World's supremacy of the Anglo-Saxon race, +of her thoughts, of her language, of her political conceptions, of +her commerce and her wealth. Its object is to crush all competitions, +all internal and external oppositions. It is the German +Ideal; it is the Roman Ideal. It is the Imperialism of all countries, +at all times, enlarged to the limits of the monstrous pretensions +of Pan-Anglo-Saxonism.</p></div> + +<p>All the propositions of the above quotation +do not bear, for one single instant, the light of +historical research, of reason, even of common +sense.</p> + +<p>I challenge Mr. Bourassa, and any one else, +to read the speeches and the writings of all those +who have studied the great question of the future +of the British Empire, and to detect therein one +single word to justify the assertion <i>that the organization +and concentration of all the Military +Forces of the Empire have for their object to help +England to dominate the world</i>.</p> + +<p>I have already abundantly proved that +England never aspired to dominate the world. I +answered Mr. Bourassa's unfounded propositions +as follows:—</p> + +<p>1—I will surely be allowed to say that for +nearly the last fifty years, I have done my best +efforts to keep myself well informed with the +opinions expressed by the most authorized political +men of the Mother Country—of all parties—by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">[152]</a></span> +the most renowned publicists, by the most distinguished +writers of the great English press. I +have yet to read one sentence leading me to suppose +that the mind of any one of them was haunted +by the foolish hope of Great Britain's domination +of the world. Many of them have spoken and +written to persuade their countrymen of the growing +urgency to consider the most effective measures +to be adopted to defend the Empire, in view +of the efforts of other nations—notably Germany—to +strengthen their military organizations. No +one advised them to incur the most heavy sacrifices +<i>in order to dominate the world</i>. They had too +much political sense to believe that such a ridiculous +scheme could ever be carried out.</p> + +<p>2—What the "Nationalist" leader calls British +Imperialism never had for its objective <i>the +gradual suppression, or at least the enslaving +of the divers nationalities constituting the British +Empire</i>.</p> + +<p>Such an assertion is nothing less than a +stroke of the imagination which recent history utterly +refutes, proving, as it does, the very reverse, +as follows:—</p> + +<p>A—The creation, by Imperial Charters, of the +great autonomous federal Canadian, Australian, +South African Dominions.</p> + +<p>B—The federal system adopted for the Dominion +of Canada purposely for the protection of +the French Canadians whose special interests are +entrusted to the Legislature of the Province of +Quebec.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">[153]</a></span></p> + +<p>C—The South African Union Charter is the +guarantee of the Boers' control of the future of +that vast stretch of country, by means of the two +fundamental principles of the British constitutional +system:—government by the majority combined +with ministerial responsibility.</p> + +<p>No Empire in the world grants as large a +measure of freedom as the British Empire does, +to the various national groups living under the +protection of her flag.</p> + +<p>3—British Imperialism, contrary to Mr. +Bourassa's assertion, was never deluded by the +wild dream <i>of a world wide supremacy of the +Anglo-Saxon race, of her thoughts, of her language, +of her political conceptions, of her commerce and +her wealth</i>.</p> + +<p>Surely, I have yet to learn that Great Britain +has dreamt, and is dreaming, to impose <i>by Force</i> +her "mentality," her language, her political institutions +to China, to Japan, to Russia, to France, to +all the South American Republics, to Italy, to +Spain, to Germany, to Austria-Hungary, to Turkey, +&c., which, considered as a whole, represent, +any one must admit, a pretty large part of the +universe.</p> + +<p>4—Mr. Bourassa's assertion that England +aspires to dominate the world, <i>economically</i>, <i>commercially</i>, +is most positively contradicted by the +history of the last eighty years. Who does not +know—and I cannot for a moment suppose that +Mr. Bourassa ignores it—that, nearly a century<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">[154]</a></span> +ago, Great Britain, finally rallied in favour of a +Free Trade Policy, has opened her market free to +the products of all the nations of the world. Is +that not a rather strange way of aspiring to +an economical domination! And whilst all the +countries of the earth, the British colonies as well +as foreign nations, can freely sell their goods in +the British market, they protect their own markets +by high customs duties—in some cases almost prohibitive—against +British goods.</p> + +<p>National commercial statistics are opened to +the "Nationalist" leader's perusal as to any one +else. If he had referred to them, he would have +learned that the Foreign Trade of Great Britain, +in 1913, the year preceding the outbreak of the +war, amounted to $7,017,775,335; exports were +valued at $3,174,101,630; imports totalized $3,843,673,695, +exceeding the exports by the large amount +of $669,572,065.</p> + +<p>By looking at the figures, Mr. Bourassa would +only have had to call upon his common sense to +draw the conclusion that England was certainly +not moving along an easy road to the commercial +domination of the world by maintaining a policy +resulting in an import trade larger, by an annual +average of nearly twenty per cent., than her +exportations.</p> + +<p>Before the war, Germany, by rapid strides, +had succeeded in attaining the second rank +amongst the great trading nations, coming next +after Great Britain. In the same year—1913—her<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">[155]</a></span> +Foreign Trade totalized $5,351,500,000, divided as +follows:—Imports $2,801,675,000; exports $2,549,825,000.</p> + +<p>The really wonderful industrial and commercial +expansion of Germany, during the last forty +years previous to the war, offered another opportunity +to Mr. Bourassa to show his spite against +Great Britain. He would have been sorry not to +make the best of it. Calling into play his fertile +imagination, he unhesitatingly charged England +with deep rooted jealousy of Germany's trade +success and the guilty intent to crush it out of +existence.</p> + +<p>To this absurd assertion—not using the word +offensively, being always determined to be courteous +in any discussion I engage—I answered by +quoting the figures of the reciprocal relative external +British and German trade. In 1913, Great +Britain sold to Germany goods to the amount of +$203,385,150, and bought German products for a +total value of $402,055,285. Great Britain's exports +to Germany were then only about fifty per +cent of her imports from the same market. It is +indeed difficult to detect in such trade relations +between two nations any sign of the intent, on the +part of the country buying from the other double +the value of her sales to her, to dominate her +people commercially.</p> + +<p>Any one knowing all the circumstances and +the causes that imposed upon Great Britain the +duty of taking part in the European struggle, cannot<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">[156]</a></span> +help being shocked at Mr. Bourassa's accusation +<i>that England has incidentally been brought +into the conflict only through the frantic desire of +her business men to use it to crush the commercial +competition of Germany</i>. No serious men could +have entertained such strange notions. And the +"Nationalist" leader certainly charged the political +leaders and the business community of England +with sheer madness.</p> + +<p>With all right minded men, the world over, +I have long ago reached the sound conclusion that +universal economical domination is only a chimerical +idea absolutely outside of all possible realization. +England does not indulge in any such extravagant +dream, being too well aware how vain +it would be.</p> + +<p>May I ask my readers—and Mr. Bourassa has +been one of them,—to join with me in a short general +review of the economical progress of the +world, in its broadest lines, rising, for this purpose, +as should be done in all cases, superior to all +national and local prejudices. A grand natural +scenery is always better appreciated from the +mountain top. Equally so, questions of universal +import must be considered from the heights of the +noblest principles inspiring the Christian desire +to promote the general good of Mankind. Considered +from this elevated standpoint, very short-sighted +indeed is the man who fails to see <span class="smcap">that +the economical progress of the world, agriculturally, +industrially, commercially, is bound up<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">[157]</a></span></span> +<span class="smcap">with intelligent, energetic and persevering +Labour; that it is the outcome of the improvements +of all the means of production, to the +constant increased perfection of the agricultural +and industrial arts, to the enlargement of +the resources of capital, accumulated by judicious +savings</span>. It is bound with the improvement +of means of transportation by land and sea; +with the much enlarged facilities of the exchange +of all kinds of products; with the superior +management,—the result of a much wider experience—of +all the institutions distributing credit; +with the energetic development of all the resources +which generous Providence has profusely provided +the earth for the good of Humanity. +It is more than useless to expect economical progress +from disastrous armed conflicts which, in the +course of a few years, nay, only a few months, +destroy the accumulated wealth of many years of +incessant labour.</p> + +<p>War is productive of untold material losses. +As a general rule, it cannot make the nations of +the world richer. Many successive generations +have for a long time to bear the crushing burden +which they inherit from guilty ambitious Rulers +as the only result of their thirst of vain glory. +Materially, a nation may profit by an unjust war, +resulting in the defeat of a weaker rival, but the +riches thus acquired by the one, either by territorial +acquisitions, or by the payment to her of +war contributions and indemnities, or both, from<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">[158]</a></span> +the other, are merely transferred from the vanquished +to the victor. The great society of nations, +instead of gaining anything by it, is only +losing, as a whole, the total amount of the financial +cost of the military operations, of the squandering +of hard earned savings, of diminished labour +and production, of the waste of productive capital, +of the loss of so many long days which could have +been so much better employed. But most deplorable +is the loss entailed by the warring nations, +and the universe at large, by the sacrifice of the +younger generations, of early youth and of strongly +developed manhood, for the success of tyrannical +and criminal purposes.</p> + +<p>There can be but one justification—and it is a +noble, a glorious one—of the sacrifice of so many +valuable lives and so much material wealth: the +sacredness, the sanctity of the cause for which a +nation, or a group of peoples, take up arms against +an enemy, or enemies, only intent on crushing +weaker rival, or rivals, by all the illegitimate +means at his, or their command, for self-aggrandizement, +for unjust domination. Such is the present +war: sacred and just on the Allied side; abominable, +brutal, barbarous on the German side, enhanced +in its guilt by the ferocious Turks and the +shameful submission of the enslaved Austrians +to the overpowering will of their teutonic masters. +It will not have cost too much if it has the result +of freeing Mankind from the horrors of German +militarism, assuring to the world a long reign of +justice and moral grandeur.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">[159]</a></span></p> + +<p>England can rightly claim a very large part +of the merit accruing to all those who have contributed +to the immense material progress of the +world during the last century. She has actively +and most intelligently worked for it by her vigorous +industrial and commercial development, by the +very numerous billions of dollars she has contributed, +all over the world, to railway building and +oceanic navigation. She has contributed to it by +her extraordinary amount of savings which allowed +her to supply the capital required for so many +varied enterprises over all the continents. She has +played the very important part of universal banker, +distributing her immense treasures to foster +production of all kinds everywhere. She has most +largely contributed to the economic phenomenon +of the gradual diminution of the universal rate of +interest.</p> + +<p>If, according to Mr. Bourassa's strange notion, +all this is to be considered as equivalent to +economical domination, the more the whole world +will enjoy it the better, more prosperous it will be, +and future generations will have so much more +cause for rejoicing at its increased development, +and to be grateful to England for it.</p> + +<p>The witnesses who, for the last sixty years, +have lived with their eyes opened, preferring the +full shining light of the bright days of universal +economical development to the darkness obscuring +fanatical minds only intent on stirring up local, +sectional and national prejudices, and miserable<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">[160]</a></span> +petty ambitions, have rejoiced at the greatly varied +advantages Humanity has derived from the +gifts of Providence favouring her with the great +scientific discoveries which have worked, are still, +and will for all times, work wonders for her material +prosperity. The regular tendency of those +natural forces recently applied to production is an +increased movement towards the unification of the +industrial, commercial and financial interests of +the world. The vital energies of all peoples have +more or less been stimulated by the same causes, +operating everywhere, reaching until lately unknown +and undeveloped regions. Engineering +genius, broadened by the new scientific resources +at its command, has triumphed over all difficulties. +The gigantic locomotive, drawing palatial passenger +coaches, and sometimes as much as a hundred +heavily loaded freight cars, run by thousands and +thousands daily through luxurious prairies. They +cross giant rivers, ascend with alertness the highest +mountains, or rush through tunnels which the +skill and hard work of man has pierced through +them, backed by the financial power of millions of +money. Automobilism covers the whole universe, +multiplying intercourse and human relations, and +making possible, in a few days of marvellous +organization, a glorious military victory like that +almost miraculously carried at the Marne.</p> + +<p>Giant steamers, of fifty to sixty thousand tons—of +a hundred thousand in the near future—ply, +day and night, over the high seas. In mid-ocean<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">[161]</a></span> +they scatter human thoughts through the air to +very distant points. They carry within their large +skulls immense quantities of the most varied +products.</p> + +<p>Means of transportation have become so +numerous, so improved, so rapid, that the surplus +agricultural production of the most fertile regions +do reach, in a few short days, the countries which, +on account of their numerous industrial and commercial +population, have to import a large quantity +of food products. The equilibrium between +production and consumption becomes yearly more +easily obtainable. Famine by the inequality of +agricultural production is very much less to be apprehended. +Millions of human beings are no longer, +as hitherto, threatened to die by starvation at +the same time that more favoured regions had a +surplus of food products which they could not use, +sell, or export.</p> + +<p>Without a most powerful capitalization of +savings—totaling, in some cases, billions of dollars—without +the marvellous development of the +great transportation industry by land and sea, +could the Canadian and American western grain +crops be delivered, within a few days' time, with +an astonishing rapidity and at very small cost, +on all the markets where they are absolutely +required for daily consumption.</p> + +<p>Every country on earth is multiplying her efforts +to develop her manufacturing interests by +an active and intelligent use of the raw materials<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">[162]</a></span> +with which her territory has been favoured by +Nature.</p> + +<p>To this intense economical development of the +world, all the peoples are contributing their shares +in various proportions, of course:—In Europe, +Great Britain, France, Germany, Russia, Austria, +Italy, Belgium, &c.; in the two Americas, the +United States, Canada—Canada with the sure +prospects of such a grand future—the Argentine +Republic, Brazil, &c.; in Asia, Japan, China, and +the so very large Asiatic regions of Russia; in +Africa, the British colonies, Egypt, Algeria, &c.; +and Australia, so recently opened to the glories of +Christian Civilization, blooming in the Pacific +ocean washing her shores, fertilizing her lands +nearer to its refreshing breeze.</p> + +<p>Who does not see that all this development +tends naturally to the economical unity of the +world. If Humanity is ever effectively delivered +from the dangers of wars like the one actually +desolating her so cruelly, she will have to be grateful +for this great boon to the unification, on a larger +scale, of the general interests of all the nations requiring +permanent peace for their regular and +harmonious growth.</p> + +<p>To the wonderful material prosperity achieved +as above explained, England has contributed +her legitimate share, without trying to dominate +economically the universe which derived all the +great advantages which her business genius has so +largely developed.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">[163]</a></span></p> + +<p>It must not be supposed that I lose sight of +the inconveniences which material prosperity may +entail. One of them is the tendency to bend the +national aspirations to materialism. This can be +counteracted by the national will to apply material +development to the more important intellectual, +moral and religious progress of the people at +large.</p> + +<p>Any nation aspiring to dominate the world by +brute force or by the power of wealth, would be +guilty of attempting an achievement just as vain +as it would be criminal in its conception.</p> + +<p>Any nation is within her undoubted right and +duty in aspiring to the legitimate influence of her +material progress, of her intellectual culture, of +her moral development, of her religious increased +perfection. Happy indeed would be the future of +Humanity if all the Nations and their Rulers +understood well, and did their best efforts to practice +Christian precepts in the true spirit of their +Divine teaching.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">[164]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XVIII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Imperialism.</span></h3> + + +<p>Mr. Bourassa is apparently so frightened by +what he calls <i>Imperialism</i> that the horrible phantom +being always present to his imagination, he +shudders at it in day time, and wildly dreams of +it at night. Judging by what he has said and +written, he seems to have worried a great deal, for +many years past, about the dire misfortunes which, +he believed, were more and more threatening the +future of the world by the strong movement of imperialist +views he detected everywhere. It is the +great hobby which saddens his life, the terrible +bugbear with which he is ever trying to arouse the +feelings of his French Canadian countrymen +against England.</p> + +<p>The deceased British statesman, called Joseph +Chamberlain, by his efforts to promote the unity of +the Empire, inspired Mr. Bourassa with a profound +fear which he wanted his compatriots to +share by all the means at his command:—public +speeches, newspaper editorials, pamphlets. He +charged him with the responsibility of the <i>infamous +crime</i> he brought England to commit in accepting +the challenge of President Kruger and the +then South African Republic, and fighting for the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">[165]</a></span> +defence of her Sovereign rights in South Africa. +According to the Nationalist leader, a vigorous +impulse was given by the South African war to +the political evolution which he termed <i>British +Imperialism</i>. Nothing was further from the true +meaning of this important event.</p> + +<p>In refuting Mr. Bourassa's assertion, I showed +that the South African war was not the outgrowth +of Imperialist ideas, and that it has in no +way resulted in a dangerous advance of the kind +of Imperialism which so much frightens him and +all those who experience his baneful influence.</p> + +<p>As I have previously proved, the South +African campaign was imposed upon England by +the then aspiration of a section only of Boer opinion, +led by the unscrupulous and haughty President +Kruger, imprudently relying on the support of the +German Kaiser who had hastened to congratulate +him for his success in the Jameson Raid. It resulted +not in favor of Imperialism of the type so +violently denounced by Mr. Bourassa, but in a +most beneficent expansion of Political Freedom by +the granting of the free British institutions to the +new great South African overseas Dominion. It +is only the other day that ex-Premier Asquith, on +the occasion of a great public function, has declared +that Premier Botha, the former most prominent +Boer General, was now one of the strongest +pillars of the British Empire.</p> + +<p>It being so important to set the opinion of the +French Canadians right respecting that question<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">[166]</a></span> +of Imperialism, so much discussed of late, and by +many with so little political sense and historical +knowledge, I would not rest satisfied with a refutation +of the special Bourassist appreciation of the +causes and results of the South African conflict. +I summarized, in a condensed review, the divers +phases of the political movement which can properly +be called <i>Imperialism</i>, tracing its origin as +far back as the organization of the first great +political Powers known to History: the Persian, +the Egyptian, the Greek Empires, &c. More than +ever before, Imperialism was triumphant during +the long Roman domination of almost all the then +known world. Every student of History is impressed +by the grandeur of the part played by the +Roman Empire in the world's drama. Constantine +struck the first blow at Roman Imperialism—unwillingly +we can rest assured—in laying the +foundations of Constantinople, and dividing the +Roman Empire into the Western and Eastern Empires. +At last, after repeated invasions, the Northern +barbarians succeeded in smashing the Roman +Colossus.</p> + +<p>After many long years during which European +political society passed through the incessant +turmoil of rival ambitions, Charlemagne sets up +anew the Western Empire, being coronated Emperor +in Rome. Ever since, amidst multiplied ups +and downs, Imperialism has swayed to and fro by +the successive edification and overthrow of the +Holy Roman Empire, the short lived Napoleonic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">[167]</a></span> +European domination, the recently organized +North German Empire.</p> + +<p>So far as Imperialism is concerned, all those +great historical facts considered, how best can it +be defined? Is it not evident that from the very +birth of political societies for the government of +Mankind, a double current of political thoughts +and aspirations has been concurrently at work, +with alternate successes and retrocessions: one +tending towards large political organizations, uniting +a variety of ethnical groups; the other operating +the reverse way to bring about their dissolution +in favour of multiplied small sovereignties. +Each of the two opposing political systems has had +its ebb and flow tides; the waves of the one, in their +flowing days, washing the shores of the other until +they had to recede before the pressure caused by +the exhaustion of their own strength and the increased +resistance of internal opposition.</p> + +<p>Viewed from this elevated standpoint, Imperialism +is not new under the sun. It is as ancient +as the world itself. Mr. Bourassa has been +uselessly spending his energy in breaking his head +against a movement which is in the very nature of +things, developing the same way under the same +favourable conditions and circumstances.</p> + +<p>Are the days we live so fraught with the dangers +of Imperialism as to justify the fears of the +alarmist? The answer would be in the affirmative, +the question being considered from the point of +view of Germany's autocratic Imperialism, if the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">[168]</a></span> +free nations of the world had not joined in a holy +union to put an end to its extravagant and tyrannical +ambition. But how is it that Mr. Bourassa, +the heaven-born anti-imperialist, so frightened at +the supposed progress of British Imperialism, is +so lenient towards Teutonic Imperialism? How +is it that from the very first days of the gigantic +struggle calling for the most heroic efforts of +the human race to emerge safe and free from the +furious waves powerfully set in motion by the most +daring absolutism that ever existed, he has not +thought proper to chastise as it deserved the worst +kind of Imperialism that he could, or any one else, +imagine?</p> + +<p>Taking for granted that the present economical +conditions of the universe, likely to intensify, +are working for great political organisations, +from the causes previously explained, any intelligent +observer could not fail to see that for the last +century four great imperialist evolutions have +been concurrently—or rather simultaneously—developing +themselves; they were the British, +the Teutonic, the Russian, the Republican in the +United States. Let no one be astonished at seeing +the two words <i>Imperialism</i> and <i>Republicanism</i> +coupled together. In their true sense, they are +easily conciliated.</p> + +<p>The Roman Republic, by the grandeur of its +part, was Imperialist as much as the Empire to +which she gave birth. Cæsar, without the imperial +crown was Emperor as much as August. He was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">[169]</a></span> +more so by his genius, and by the eminent position +he had acquired by one of the most brilliant +careers in History.</p> + +<p>Bonaparte, General and First Consul, in the +closing days of the first French Republic, was +Emperor as much as he became on the day of his +Coronation, at Paris, by the Sovereign Pontiff.</p> + +<p>Imperialism being a great historical fact +through all the ages, and most certainly destined +to further developments, is it to be judged favourably +or alarmingly?</p> + +<p>No doubt the problem is of the greatest possible +political importance. The question can, I +consider, be at the outset simplified as follows:—Would +the prosperity, the freedom, the happiness +of the world be better served by great political +Powers, or by the multiplication of small sovereignties? +It is just as well, and even better, to +admit at once that a unique, a dogmatic, answer +cannot be given to that question. Independent +nations, sovereign societies, are not created at will +by men, merely according to their fancy, to their +variable and very often undefined wishes. History +teaches that they are the outgrowth of various circumstances, +of many divergent causes,—the most +important, the one inscrutable, being always the +action of Divine Providence directing the destinies +of peoples as well as those of every human being. +Different causes produce, of course, different results. +Large and small political communities can +surely be productive of much good for their populations.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">[170]</a></span> +Much depends upon the intelligence, the +wisdom, the devotion, the patriotism of the rulers +and the governed. They can also do much harm. +Unfortunately, the readers of past events have too +much reason to deplore that both large and small +political organizations have been equally guilty of +maladministration, of ambitious cupidity of their +neighbours' possessions, of unjust wars. As an uncontrovertible +example, can I not point to the +present German Empire, whose origin dates back +to the days of the very small Prussia of two centuries +ago, fighting her way up to her actual greatness +by successive, unfair, and often criminal +aggressions.</p> + +<p>After reading much of the history of past ages, +I have not been able to come to the conclusion—and +the more I read, the less inclined I am to do +so—that the days when England, France, Central +Europe, Italy, &c., were subdivided into numerous +small political organizations, almost always warring, +were preferable to ours, even darkened and +saddened as they are by the present trials and +sufferings.</p> + +<p>If, on the other hand, the causes which at all +times have tended to the creation of large political +sovereignties are gradually acquiring an increased +momentum of strength and activity, from the +changed conditions brought about by the great +scientific discoveries so wonderfully developing the +commercial relations of the nations, is it not more +advisable to study the true nature of the evolution<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">[171]</a></span> +and the good it can produce, rather than to shiver +at the supposed prospects of an Imperialist cataclysm +so certainly to be averted if public opinion is +sound and Rulers wise. Crying on the shores of +the St. Lawrence, against the advance of the rolling +waves, would not prevent the tide from running +up. The mad man who would try it, and persist +in remaining on the spot, displaying his indignant +and extravagant protest, would surely be +submerged and drowned.</p> + +<p>Political developments, like many others, obey +natural laws which no true statesman can ignore +nor overlook. Because the limits of a political +organization are extended, does it necessarily follow +that only deplorable consequences can be +expected from their enlargement? Surely not. +One might as well pretend that unity, cohesion, +strength, grandeur, are only productive of baneful +results. Is it not a certainty that they can be +equally beneficial or harmful, according to the intellectual +and moral qualities of those who are +called upon to apply them to the best interests of +those they govern.</p> + +<p>German Imperialism, for instance, was not +<i>per se</i> a public misfortune. It became such because +instead of using its instrumentality for the general +good of the world as well as that of Germany, +it was applied to a barbarous and criminal purpose +to satisfy unjust and senseless aspirations.</p> + +<p>In the same years, all the resources of +British Imperialism,—so abhorrent to Mr. Bourassa<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">[172]</a></span> +and his Nationalist adepts who view with +such meekness the Teutonic type—have been +brought into play for the freedom of the world and +the protection of the small nationalities—notably +Belgium.</p> + +<p>Bulgaria was a small State. Was it on this +account less ambitious and troublesome for its +neighbours? Any one conversant with the recent +Balkan history knows that Bulgaria has from the +start aspired to dominate the Balkan States. +When the Berlin Government struck the hour +which was to throw not only Europe, but three-fourths +of the universe into the worst horrors of +war, has Bulgaria rallied to the defence of her +weak neighbour, Servia? Has she proved any +sympathy for treacherously crushed Belgium?</p> + +<p>I emphatically declare that I would oppose +Imperialism with all my might, if I thought that +it is by nature a necessary producer of absolutism, +of autocratic tyranny. But, the British precedent +considered through all its beneficial developments, +I must recognize that true Imperialism is not incompatible +with the just and wise exercise of political +liberty, with respectful protection of the +rights and conditions of the divers national +elements under its ægis.</p> + +<p>I pray to remain to my last day a faithful +friend of the political liberties of the people. +Knowing, as I do, how hard it is to apply them to +the government of nations—great or small—I am +not bewildered by vain illusions. But I cannot<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">[173]</a></span> +conceive—and never will—that the justice of the +real principles of Political Liberty is to be denied +on account of the difficulties of their satisfactory +working, certainly obtainable when applied in conformity +with the dictates of moral laws owing all +their power to their Divine origin.</p> + +<p>The best political institutions which can work +out such great advantages for the populations +enjoying them, are too often diverted from their +beneficient course by the vicious passions of those +who are charged with, and responsible for, their +administration. It would be most illogical to draw +the inference that good institutions become bad by +their guilty management.</p> + +<p>Free and autocratic governments are essentially +different in their natural structure. Though +liable to mismanagement by unscrupulous politicians, +free institutions can, under ordinary favourable +conditions, be trusted to be productive of +much good for the peoples living under their protection. +Autocracy—the whole human history +proves it—by nature engenders absolutism. +Crowned or revolutionary despots as a rule are +not imbued with the patriotism nor purified by the +virtues required for the good government of a +country. Kaiserism, Terrorism and Bolshevikism +are equally despicable and unfit to contribute to +the sound progress which liberty, practiced by +sensible and wise men, can develop.</p> + +<p>Reverting to the Nationalist bugbear, which +does not in the least move me to despair of Canada's<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">[174]</a></span> +future, I consider that Imperialism, sensibly +appreciated, is of two kinds: Autocratic Imperialism; +Democratic Imperialism:—Absolutism is the +foundation stone of the former; Political Liberty +that of the latter. I am energetically opposed to +the first. I sincerely believe that the second can +do a great deal for the prosperity of the countries +where it has regularly and justifiably been developed +according to the natural laws of its growth.</p> + +<p>Autocratic Imperialism, in contemporaneous +history, is almost exclusively typified by its +Teutonic production. A general review of the +world shows that for the last century, and more, +with one sad exception, all the nations have been +moving along the path leading to a greater freedom +of their institutions. Even Japan and China +have joined in the race. Russia had deliberately +done so. Much was expected from her first efforts, +and much would certainly have been reaped in due +course had not the calamitous war still raging at +first opened an opportunity for the reactionary +Russian element, strongly influenced by German +intrigues, spies and money, to check, through the +Petrograd Court, the forward movement of Russian +political liberty, and to impede, for Germany's +sake, the success of the Russian military operations. +Under those circumstances—as was also to +be expected—the advancing wave of the aspirations +of the great Russian people for more political +freedom, was bound either to recede before the +autocratic outburst, or to rush impetuously against<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">[175]</a></span> +the wall Germany was to her best helping to raise +against it. The latter prevision happened, history +once more repeating itself.</p> + +<p>Even barbarous Turkey, in recent years, had +been somewhat shaken by a sudden desire to +remove some of her secular shackles. The young +Turks movement might have had some desirable +results had the Ottoman Empire, as every national +and political considerations should have induced +her to do, sided with France and England.</p> + +<p>Germany is actually the only country in the +world where Autocratic Imperialism has been +flourishing during the last century. We all know +the extent and the grievousness of the calamity it +has wrought on the universe.</p> + +<p>During the same last century, Democratic +Imperialism—using the term in its broadest and +most reasonable meaning—has had two distinct +beneficial developments:—the Monarchical Democratic +Imperialism, and the Republican Democratic +Imperialism.</p> + +<p>The Monarchical Democratic or free Imperialism—it +is scarcely necessary for me to say—is +that of Great Britain.</p> + +<p>The Republican Democratic or free Imperialism +is that of the United States of America, of the +Argentine Republic, of Brazil.</p> + +<p>Happily the two great and glorious countries +which are favoured with the advantages of the +Democratic type of Imperialism are united in a +grand and noble effort to destroy the German<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">[176]</a></span> +Autocratic Imperialism in chastisement of its +criminal aspirations to universal domination.</p> + +<p>The two types of Democratic or free Imperialism—the +Monarchical and the Republican—can be +better illustrated by a comparative short historical +study of their development in Great Britain and +her colonies, and in the United States. I summarize +it as follows, beginning by the last mentioned, +as it requires a shorter exposition.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">[177]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XIX.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">American Imperialism.</span></h3> + + +<p>The still recent and wonderful growth of the +two American continents, in population and +wealth, is almost an incredible marvel. It is none +the least politically.</p> + +<p>The two Americas, by the extent of their areas, +the vastness of their productive lands, the length +and largeness of their mighty Rivers, the broadness +of their Lakes, the grandeur of their scenery, +seem to be most adapted to great developments of +many kinds. It is difficult to think of small conceptions +originating in the New World, which the +genius of Columbus discovered and the combined +genius of all the great races of the Old are united +in developing.</p> + +<p>Let me first put the question:—when the +leading European nations undertook to colonize +the new Continents, were they not, consciously or +not, throwing the Imperialist seed in a fertile land +where it was sure to take root and blossom? Spain, +France, and, last, England were certainly not +obeying the dictates of our "Nationalist school" +when they brought under their Sovereign authority +such vast stretches of American territory.</p> + +<p>That Christian Civilization was to be extended<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">[178]</a></span> +to the new great Hemisphere, goes without saying. +That the riches, then unknown, of the New World, +were to be extracted from the land so full of them, +was one of the duties of the discoverers, all will +admit. The European Governments in extending +their Sovereignties to America unfortunately +adopted the mistaken Colonial Policy then still too +much prevalent. Their error was to stick to the +wrong conception that a colony was important +only in the measure that it could be favourable to +the interests of the Metropolis. History proves +that this colonial system is bound to lead to unfair +treatment of the colonies. Absolutism, then dominant +in Europe, could not be expected to show any +tender leniency towards the Colonials who were +above all to work for the wealth and glory of the +Metropolis. Spain proved to be the worst promoter +of that Regime. Her failure has been most +complete. She has had to withdraw her flag from +the very large part of America over which it might +have been kept waving, if sounder and more just +political notions had prevailed in the narrowed +minds of her Rulers.</p> + +<p>England, treading along the wrong path of +Colonial oppression, but in a much less proportion, +had to face a like result in the revolt of her American +Colonies. Fortunately for her, for America +and the world at large, the event widely opened her +eyes. In acknowledging the independence of the +young Republic of the United States, she was destined +to be proud of her offspring in witnessing the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">[179]</a></span> +astonishing development of the child to whom she +had given birth. Could she have then foreseen +that the day would come when at the hour of her +dire trial, the daughter who threw off her motherly +authority, too stringently exercised, would +rush to her support for the defence of the very +principles of Political Liberty for which she, the +child, had fought for her independence, how soon +would England have forgotten the sufferings of the +parting and blessed Providence for them!</p> + +<p>The American Revolution, successfully carried +out, was the occasion for England to revolutionize +her Colonial Policy. She was the first nation—and +I am sorry to say she has remained alone—to +understand with great clearness that the old +Colonial Regime, fraught with such disastrous +consequences, must be done away with and replaced +by the new one which called the colonies to +the enjoyment, to the largest possible extent, of +the free institutions of the Mother Land.</p> + +<p>Like every new born child, whose laborious +birth was critical, the American Republic experienced +great difficulties the very moment she +commenced to breathe freely. So true it is always +that national development, like personal success, +cannot be achieved without struggle.</p> + +<p>The United States offer the example of the +best development of the Imperialist evolution in +the world. It dates as far back as the proclamation +of the Independence of the Republic. When +she was admitted into the international society of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">[180]</a></span> +Sovereign States, she had at first to settle her +political organization. The framing of a constitutional +charter proved to be a very arduous task, +at times almost desperate.</p> + +<p>Three sets of divergent opinions were fighting +at close range during the protracted and solemn +deliberations which at last reached a happy +conclusion. Thirteen American British Colonies +had coalesced to wring their Independence from +England. The goal once attained, a first group of +opinion was favoured by the supporters of the +dissolution of the temporary union organized to +secure the Independence of the whole, but to +revert, they said, if successful, to their previous +separate status. Had this view prevailed, at the +very start North America would have been cumbered +with thirteen Sovereign States. Many were +alarmed at the creation of so many small Republics. +More reasonable persons suggested to +organize three or four of them, instead of thirteen, +meeting as much as possible the wants natural to +geographical conditions. It was no doubt an improvement +on the first mentioned scheme. It met +with the hearty support of devoted adepts.</p> + +<p>It is much to be hoped that they will forever +receive from the successive generations of their +countrymen the reward of the gratitude they deserve, +the true statesmen who, at this important +juncture, stepped on the scene and bravely took +their stand in favour of the maintenance of the +Union which had conquered Independence, and of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">[181]</a></span> +the establishment of only one great Republic. The +celebrated Hamilton was their trusted leader. They +knew they were undertaking an herculean task. +At that time, the population of the thirteen original +States, scarcely four millions in number, was +scattered over a vast territory, and located, for +the most part, on the lands near the Atlantic +coasts, two thousand miles in length, from North +to South. Transportation was in a very primitive +stage. Many years had yet to run before the +whistle of the locomotive, powerful and struggling, +would be echoed by the solitude of immense forests. +No one foresaw that, in less than a century, the +overflowing tide of European immigration would +roll its waves so powerfully as to cross the whole +continent and the Rocky Mountains to reach the +coast of the Pacific Ocean.</p> + +<p>With such conditions, so unfavourable to the +aspirations of only one new Independent State, +moulding together political groups so far apart, +interests apparently so hostile, the local point of +view, local prejudices, were sure to dominate. +They inspired the strong current of opinion in +favour of the dissolution of the temporary Union, +and the organization of every one of the old +provinces into a separate Sovereign State.</p> + +<p>How, under such circumstances, the friends +of a unique National American Union succeeded +in the marvellous achievement of carrying their +point by a prodigy of persuasive demonstration, +will forever be a wonder for the student of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">[182]</a></span> +Republic's history. Few in numbers when they +boldly threw their challenge, they encountered the +shock of local fanaticism heightened by their offensive. +Everything seemed to predict their utter +failure. If ever Founders of States have proved +the heroism of their convictions, the American +Federalists have most gloriously done so. Undoubtedly, +the force of the argument was with +them. But what can logic, reason, good sense, too +often do against inveterate prejudices? Were +they, in this particular instance, destined to be +powerless?</p> + +<p>The Federalists—such is their historical +name—were not to be disheartened by the formidable +obstacles thrown in their way. An <i>Imperialist</i> +inspiration was certainly the basic foundation of +their demonstration finally triumphant. They +told their countrymen that if they were to erect +thirteen small Republics upon the burning ruins +of the first Union to which they owed their Independence, +they would prepare a very sad future +for their children and children's children. European +immigration was setting in, slowly but +surely. They predicted that the World, this time, +would witness, not a barbarous invasion like that +which overthrew the Roman Empire, but one which +the Old World would overflow to the New Continents. +This surplus European population would +bring over to America Christian Civilization, the +training of hard work, large hopes, courage, experience +in many ways, persevering energy, which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">[183]</a></span> +would transform the boundless regions which +could become their national heritage—until then +the domain of the wandering Indian—into one of +the greatest and wealthiest countries on earth. +Would they commit the irreparable error to destroy +the certainty of such a magnificent National +Destiny, by creating thirteen separate governments, +with the sure result of renewing in +America, by such race groupings, the atrocious +military conflicts which, for centuries, have flooded +the European soil with human blood.</p> + +<p>Hamilton and some of his most distinguished +friends published that work, entitled: "<i>The +Federalist</i>", which will ever live as one of the +broadest and most elevated productions of Political +Intelligence. To all, and especially to the +"Nationalist" theorists, I strongly recommend the +reading of that book, a monument of the genius of +great statesmen.</p> + +<p>In short, after a lengthy discussion characterized +by their brilliant eloquence and their argumentative +strength, the supporters of the Federal +Union of the thirteen States, under one Sovereignty, +carried the day. They had well deserved their +glorious triumph. The Republic of the United +States of North America was founded under the +ægis of the free constitutional Charter which has +done so much for her prosperity and her grandeur.</p> + +<p>Such was the initial move of the evolution of +American Imperialism. Those amongst us who +desire to learn more about its developments have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">[184]</a></span> +only to look over the boundary line. The thirteen +original States, federally united, have increased +to number forty-four, with three more territories +gradually developing into Statehood.</p> + +<p>The actual population of the Republic is already +much over a <i>hundred million</i>, living in unrivalled +prosperity and contentment on a territorial +area of more than <i>three millions and a half +square miles</i>, larger than all the European Continent. +The sun of the present century will set +upon a people of more than 250,000,000, with a +splendid situation in a world to the destinies of +which they will contribute in many admirable +ways, if they are only true to the Christian principles +which alone can assure Civilization and +Progress.</p> + +<p>If the term <i>Imperialism</i> truly means what +the word implies,—<i>Sovereignty being exercised +over a large population and a vast territory</i>, this +political evolution, so decried by some, has most +undoubtedly achieved a great success amongst our +neighbours to the South.</p> + +<p>In all sincerity, may I not ask every unprejudiced +mind:—has not the whole World every +reason to be much elated at witnessing the +beneficent results of the triumph of the American +Federalists? Evidently, it has been <i>Imperial</i> in +its nature, in its proportions. It is so in its promises +for the future greatness of the Republic. It +has maintained, with only one exception, peace and +harmony during nearly a century and a half,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">[185]</a></span> +between the descendants of the European nationalities +who have trusted their future welfare to +the Sovereignty of the United States. Instead of +wasting their energies in endless conflicts, such as +numerous small States would have infallibly occasioned, +thanks to the unity of the Sovereign +Power binding into an admirable whole territories +larger than Europe, they have learned to consider +themselves as citizens of the same free country, as +the free subjects of the same governmental authority. +The temporary rupture of the Union, caused +by the war of Secession, was but a vain reactionary +action against the powerful current driving the +Republic towards her grand future.</p> + +<p>It is most unlikely—I can say <i>impossible</i> +without the slightest hesitation—that the United +States, after taking such a grand and glorious part +in the present war, will abandon the broad and +felicitous policy by which they have grown to be +one of the greatest independent nations of the +world, to drop so low as to adopt the blinding +notions of a narrow, sectional, prejudiced and fanatical +"Nationalism", such as the type which would +ruin the future of our own Dominion, if ever it was +allowed to prevail. They know too well, by the +happiest experience, that the only true "<i>Nationalism</i>" +is that which by the united effort of the intelligence, +the culture, the strength, the patriotism +of citizens of divers races has wrought for them +their present admirable national status so full +of the brightest promises. When peace shall have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">[186]</a></span> +been restored, the great and mighty American +Republic will be one of the leading Powers on +earth, owing her unrivalled prosperity in a very +large measure to her appreciation of the wonderful +results obtainable by the union of all her subjects, +of whatever racial origins, working with the same +heart and devotion for the grandeur of their +common country.</p> + +<p>I am not unduly enthusiastic, I am only speaking +the plain truth, when I affirm that the Republican +Imperialism of the United States has been +most beneficent, having guaranteed to Mankind the +inestimable boon of laying deep and strong in a +virgin soil, providentially gifted with the most +varied, the most abundant, the richest resources, +the destinies of a great Sovereign Nation comprising +numerous ethnical groups. This liberal, progressive, +peaceful, harmonious Imperialism, it is +a duty to approve wishing it to achieve new triumphs +for the general good of Humanity.</p> + +<p>Republican Imperialism is also making its +way—contaminating it, our "Nationalists" would +say—in Southern America. This large and splendid +half of the New World has been for too many +years the theatre of civil troubles which appeared +endless. A great change for the better has taken +place since the beginning of the concentration +movement which has united almost the entire +Southern American Continent into eight Sovereign +States, two of which with really Imperial +proportions.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">[187]</a></span></p> + +<p>The Brazilian Republic has a territorial area +of 3,218,991 square miles, with a population of +more than 24,000,000 increasing at the average +rate of six or seven hundred thousand a year. +With the great natural resources at her command, +she will certainly develop into one great Power. +The day is not so far distant when it will have a +population exceeding <i>fifty millions</i> living in +comfort on a soil of luxurious wealth.</p> + +<p>The Argentine Republic has a territory of 1,153,119 +square miles in extent. Her population is +over 8,000,000, having doubled during the last +twenty years. At this rate of a yearly increase of +five per cent., it is easily foreseen what large total +it will reach in a few years. It is wealthy, doing +the best with her splendid resources, already +contributing extensively to feed the population of +Europe.</p> + +<p>The other Southern American Republics—the +Bolivian, the Chilean, the Colombian, the Peruvian, +the Venezuelan—have all territorial areas +double in extent of those of the Great Powers of +Western and Central Europe.</p> + +<p>In Southern America, like everywhere else, +the rising tide is not running in favour of a multiplicity +of small Sovereignties, always in a warring +frame of mind. Since her political reorganization, +South America, as a whole, has enjoyed the advantages +of peace and of a large material progress.</p> + +<p>In reality the same political phenomenon is +to be found in the five continents forming the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">[188]</a></span> +whole earthly globe. Let the "Nationalists" call +it <i>Imperialism</i> if they like, I cannot help concluding +that it is the outgrowth of natural causes +operating in the sense of larger political units, +giving to the Nations getting so constituted, prestige, +power, grandeur, favouring public order +and, in many instances, the development of free +institutions.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">[189]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XX.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">British Imperialism.</span></h3> + + +<p>Let me now consider the wonderful development +of what I have called Monarchical Democratic +or free Imperialism. It has so far been +exclusively of British growth. It is the typical +form of Imperialism which has been honoured with +the most violent, the most unjust, denunciations of +our "Nationalists".</p> + +<p>How did it deserve such an hysterical reprobation? +Such is the question to which I shall now +endeavour to give a decisive negative answer.</p> + +<p>I have previously once said that British Imperialism, +like American Imperialism, has Political +Liberty as its foundation stone. I think this +can easily be proven.</p> + +<p>Any close observer of political events, will +agree with me, I am confident, that Imperialism is +also "<span class="smcap">OFFENSIVE</span>" and "<span class="smcap">DEFENSIVE</span>" in its expansion. +The meaning of these two terms is clear.</p> + +<p>For the last fifty years, <span class="smcap">"Offensive" Imperialism</span> +has been the <span class="smcap">German despotic Imperialism</span>. +The present war—its criminal work—is the convincing +evidence in support of the charge.</p> + +<p>I have, I believe, proved to the satisfaction of +every fair minded man, that during the same last<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">[190]</a></span> +fifty years England's constant efforts have been to +maintain peace. Consequently, I am authorized +to draw the conclusion that British Imperialism +was not intended to be, and has not been +"<span class="smcap">Offensive</span>".</p> + +<p>The Imperialist effort <span class="smcap">OFFENSIVELY</span>, <span class="smcap">AGGRESSIVELY</span> +and <span class="smcap">VIOLENTLY</span> tending to the continuous +and unmeasured expansion of a Sovereign Power, +with the objective of universal domination by all +possible means, however unjust, immoral and +savage they may be, is a most guilty effort deserving +the severest condemnation. Such is the German +autocratic Imperialism.</p> + +<p>On the contrary, the <span class="smcap">DEFENSIVE</span> Imperialist +effort, having for its only object the protection of +an Empire, the maintenance of her standing in the +society of nations, and of peace so essential to the +general prosperity of the world, is meritorious, +beneficient and laudable. Such has been the +British Monarchical democratic Imperialism.</p> + +<p>It is from this elevated standpoint that +I will consider the negotiations which, for the last +few years, have taken place between the Metropolis +and her autonomous Colonies, respecting Imperial +defence. While admitting the right of all the free +citizens of Canada to appreciate them, and entertaining +a real respect for the sincerity of opinions +which I cannot conscientiously share, I cannot +help considering that many amongst us have fallen +into a serious error in judging the nature of these +negotiations.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">[191]</a></span></p> + +<p>Is it truly, as has been asserted, in obedience +to a powerful wave of "<span class="smcap">Offensive Imperialism</span>" +that Great Britain has of late convened representatives +of her free Colonies to meet, in London, to +confer about the best means to adopt for the +general security of the whole British Empire?</p> + +<p>Is it, as also asserted, with the unworthy +design to entrap the Colonies that their self-appointed +delegates have been called in secret +conclaves where the political leaders of England +would, by unfair and foul means, prevail upon +them to agree to unjust sacrifices on the part of +the peoples they represented?</p> + +<p>I am absolutely unable to share such erroneous +views. I must admit with all candor that I +have not yet been brought to the conclusion that +British Statesmen are all contaminated with +"Machiavellism". A free country like the United +Kingdom is not a land where such deplorable +principles are likely to blossom.</p> + +<p>What are then the extraordinary events which +have recently taken place to justify the assertion +of the "Nationalist" leader that, in the course of +the last few years, a complete <span class="smcap">Revolution</span> has +been wrought in the relations of the autonomous +Colonies with their Metropolis? Of such a Revolution, +cunningly promoted to bring the colonies +against their will to participate in the Imperial +wars—<i>les guerres de l'empire</i>—I do not perceive +the smallest shadow of traces.</p> + +<p>As everybody else, living with their eyes not<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">[192]</a></span> +closed to the light of day, I clearly saw, principally +during the last twenty years, that important +developments were taking place under the sun; +that European equilibrium upon the maintenance +of which universal peace so much depended, was +rapidly breaking asunder; that the German Empire +was more and more unmasking her guilty +ambition to dominate an enslaved universe; that, +to reach that goal, she was organizing an army +formidable by its millions of warriors, their superior +training, their ironed discipline and their unrivalled +armament. I knew that the sadly famous +Kaiser Wilhelm II. was determined, at all cost, to +increase the power of his Empire by the addition +of a military fleet in such proportions as to be able, +in a successful naval battle, to conquer the supremacy +of the seas.</p> + +<p>Under such circumstances, was it to be supposed +that the Statesmen responsible for the government +of Great Britain would be so careless and +so blind as not to see the dark spots crowding on +the horizon!</p> + +<p>The problem of Imperial defence was then +once more raised, not by a mere caprice of vain +glory on the part of England, but by the inevitable +outcome of the initiative of would-be opponents, +if not actually declared enemies. The overseas +colonies being more and more likely to be attacked, +in a general conflict, was it surprising that the +British Government was induced to confer with +them for their common defence under the new<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">[193]</a></span> +conditions which were surely not of their own +metropolitan or colonial creation.</p> + +<p>All the representatives of Great Britain, of +Canada, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, at +the London conferences, took part in those solemn +deliberations with the full sense of their responsibility. +None of them was so mistaken as to +consider the question, of paramount importance, +of the <span class="smcap">DEFENSIVE</span> organization of the Empire, as +futile, merely to be used by the astuteness of some +and the guilty complicity of others, joining together +to sacrifice the future of their common country. +The odious imputation, the shameless charge, +were equally unjust and calumnious for the British +ministers and the colonial public men who, in +their turn, went to London to deliberate on subjects +so vitally interesting all the component parts +of the Empire.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">[194]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXI.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Situations of 1865 and 1900-14 Compared.</span></h3> + + +<p>Our "Nationalist" opponents of all colonial +participation in the Imperial wars, affirm that +Canada should have abided with the convention +of 1865. Are they not aware that, since that year, +a great deal of water has run along the rivers; that +the world, although perhaps not wiser, has at least +grown half a century older; that so many ancient +conditions have radically changed; that nations, +like individuals, to be progressive, cannot go on +marking time on the same small hardened spot?</p> + +<p>Any man sincerely desirous to form for himself +an enlightened opinion on the question of +Imperial defence, must first admit that two national +and general situations, totally different, +create widely different duties.</p> + +<p>Let us compare for a moment, 1865 and 1900-14—<i>yesterday +and to-day</i>—as the "Nationalist" +leader says.</p> + +<p>Fifty years ago, the German Empire was non-existent. +Nothing pointed to the early birth of +this terrible child destined to grow so rapidly to +such colossal proportions.</p> + +<p>The French Empire was the leading continental +Power; Great Britain, then as now, the leading +naval Power, both military and mercantile.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">[195]</a></span></p> + +<p>Those two nations, without a formal alliance, +had been united ever since the days when Lord +Palmerston favoured the advent of Napoleon III.</p> + +<p>The Union of England and France was doing +much to maintain the peace of the world.</p> + +<p>The United States were just emerging from +the trials of their great Civil War. They had to +solve the very difficult problem of their national +reconstruction. Their population did not exceed +thirty-five millions.</p> + +<p>How different was the situation of 1900-14!</p> + +<p>The German Empire had become formidable +with her population of 68,000,000, her soldiers +numbering more than 7,000,000, with 1,000,000 of +men permanently under arms, ever ready for an +offensive campaign, with her fleet much enlarged +yearly at the cost of enormous financial sacrifices; +allied to Austria-Hungary, with her population of +50,000,000, to Italy, with her 36,000,000—then +being one of the Triple Alliance—supported by +Turkey and Bulgaria,—in all a combined strength +of 150,000,000 bodies and souls; with the Germans +exalted to the utmost by persistent appeals to their +feelings and to their ambitious dreams.</p> + +<p>The American Republic grown to the rank of a +first class Power, with a population of 100,000,000 +and a magnificent military fleet.</p> + +<p>Was it even sensible to pretend that such altered +worldly conditions did not make the revision +of the understanding arrived at in 1865 an +imperious necessity.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">[196]</a></span></p> + +<p>They are living in an imaginary world those +of us who assert that Canada could remain a British +Colony under a permanent agreement—never +to be amended—by which the Mother Country +would be bound to defend her, at all costs and all +hazards, whenever and by whomsoever attacked, +Canada in the meantime refusing, whatever the +perils of England might be, to spend a dollar and +to send one man for her defence. There could be +but one issue to the consideration of such propositions: +the dissolution of the British Empire. I +regret to say that Mr. Bourassa has audaciously +declared that such has been the objective of his +oppositionist campaign to the Canadian participation +in Imperial wars.</p> + +<p>If Canada, through its constitutional organ, +the Ottawa Parliament, had signified to England, +in 1914, that she would not take the least part in +the war imposed upon her by Germany, nor do anything +to help her Allies, France and Belgium, +could she, without blushing with shame, have +claimed the protection of the British flag, if her +territory had been attacked.</p> + +<p>Would not England have been fully justified +in taking the initiative to break the bond which +could henceforth but be disastrous to her, our +shameless attitude towards her, at the hour of her +peril, being most favourable to her mortal enemy.</p> + +<p>Have I not every sound reason to conclude that +Canadian participation in the present war was in +no way whatever the outcome of an Imperialist<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_197" id="Page_197">[197]</a></span> +attempt to drag her, against her will, in the conflict +into which she so nobly hastened to enter with the +determination to fight to the last, and to deserve +her fair share of the glory which will be but one of +the rewards that will accrue to all those who will +have united together to save Liberty and Civilization +from the German barbarous onslaught.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">[198]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">British Imperialism Naturally Pacifist.</span></h3> + + +<p>According to its "Nationalist" opponents, +British Imperialism has always been of a conquering +nature, like that of the Roman type and those +of ancient history.</p> + +<p>This opinion is formally contradicted by a +long succession of undeniable historical facts. Undoubtedly +the splendid structure of the British +Empire was not erected without armed support. +The creation, without an army organization, of a +Sovereign State comprising a fourth of the Globe, +which component parts, themselves of colossal +proportions, situated in all the continents, separated +by the immensity of the seas, would have been +more than marvellous.</p> + +<p>I will not pretend that always and everywhere +the expansion of British Sovereignty has +taken place according to the dictates of strict justice. +Still I do not hesitate to say that, on the +whole, it has developed under conditions which +were never the outcome of a mere conquering +ambition.</p> + +<p>With much reason, English citizens are proud +of the fact that their Empire is the result of a +<span class="smcap">NATURAL GROWTH</span>. When the call to arms had to +be made, it was oftener for <span class="smcap">DEFENSIVE WARS</span>.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">[199]</a></span></p> + +<p>The British Empire, outside the United Kingdom, +comprise, for the most important part, Canada, +Australia, the South African Dominion, and +India. It is easy to explain, in a few lines, under +what general circumstances those immense regions +were brought under the British flag. I shall, of +course, begin this short historical review by the +acquisition of Canada by England.</p> + +<p>The great event of the discovery of the New +World, at the end of the fifteenth century, tempted +the western European nations to acquire vast colonies +in the new continent. Spain, France, Portugal, +Holland, were the first in the field. If the +craving for large colonies in the new Hemisphere +was of Imperialist inspiration, England does not +appear to have been one of the first Powers infested +with the disease so dreaded by our "Nationalists". +She was rather late to catch it. Hollanders +settled in New York before the British.</p> + +<p>As all ought to know, Spain took hold of the +whole of Southern America. France displayed her +flag on the larger part of Northern America, commanding +the St. Lawrence and Mississippi Rivers, +and the Great Lakes. Those immense regions, extending +from the cold north to flowery Louisiana, +were called <span class="smcap">New France</span>. Later on, that part of +North America bordering on the Atlantic, from +Maine to Virginia, became British, and was subdivided +into thirteen provinces, or separate colonies. +For such a dominating Imperialist, as some +pretend she has ever been, it must be admitted<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">[200]</a></span> +that England was rather in a modest frame of +mind with regard to her colonial enterprises. The +British Government itself was slow in moving +towards the Imperialist goal which was stirring +up Spain and France to a much greater activity. +The first British emigrants were Puritans looking +for that religious liberty, under a new shining sun, +which was denied to them by their native land in +those days when fanaticism was unfortunately too +much triumphant in many countries.</p> + +<p>As it was inevitable, the European Colonies +in America, all satellites of their metropolis, fell +victims to the political rivalries of the nations +who settled them. Not satisfied with fighting in +Europe, those Powers also decided to gratify the +New World with a specimen of what they could do +on the battlefields. The Seven Years War did not +originate in America, as it was the outcome of +secular European international difficulties.</p> + +<p>If the European nations, in taking possession +of America, were making a conquest, it was that of +the white race over the yellow one of the New +World. Spain and France, in raising their flags +over four-fifths of the American continent, were +surely strengthening Imperialism. Will our "Nationalists" +accuse them of having unduly saved the +New World from the secular Indian barbarism?</p> + +<p>More especially, Spanish Imperialism in America +was most despotic. By a very false political +conception, Spain undertook a great settlement +work in America with the sole object of bleeding<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">[201]</a></span> +her colonies to her only profit. It failed disastrously +as it deserved to. It is because she persevered +in her fatal error that, in 1898, she was +forced out of Cuba. The last stone of her immense +colonial edifice was cast away.</p> + +<p>England shared Spain's error, but much less +heavily. Like Spain, she reaped what she had +sowed. The thirteen British American colonies +revolted and conquered their Independence. Alone +French Canada remained loyal to England.</p> + +<p>If the French Canadians had sided with the +British Colonies to the South in the contest for +their Independence, the Canada of those days +would certainly have been included in the American +Republic when England was forced, by the +fate of war, to acknowledge the new Sovereign +nation. Her offspring then violently broke away +from the parental home, but has recently hastened +to her defence, at the hour of danger, only remembering +the first happy years of her childhood.</p> + +<p>Following the loyal advice of their spiritual +leaders, and of their most trusted civil chieftains, +the French Canadians remained true to England, +refusing to desert her, thus maintaining her Sovereign +rights over the Northern half of the Continent +destined, a century later, to develop into the present +Dominion, enjoying the free institutions of the +Mother Country.</p> + +<p>As previously stated, the American Revolution +brought for ever to an end British absolutism +in the new continent. Henceforth, liberty and autonomy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">[202]</a></span> +were to be the two foundation stones of a +new colonial Policy which, far from disrupting the +Empire as the autocratic one had done, was to +cement its union so strongly as to make possible +the gigantic military effort she has displayed for +more than the last four years.</p> + +<p>The Treaty of Paris brought the Seven Years +War to a close. Once more the peace of the world +was temporarily restored. By the Treaty of Paris, +Canada was ceded to England, our "Nationalists" +say. If so, how can they pretend that the extension +of British Sovereignty over the regions which +have become the great autonomous Dominion of +Canada was an undue manifestation of British +conquering Imperialism?</p> + +<p>An intelligent and impartial student of the +early settlements of the two continents of America +can only draw the conclusion that the New World +has not been the theatre of the operations of British +Imperialism. Its first real attempt was tried—with +much laudable success—in 1867, by the federal +union of the Canadian provinces, decreed by +the Sovereign legislative power of the Parliament +of Great Britain, at our own request and in accordance +with our own freely expressed wishes.</p> + +<p>Australia is the second autonomous colony of +England in extent and importance. It comprises +nearly all the territory of the Oceanic continent, +so called from the geographical position, in the +Pacific Ocean, of the Islands forming it. New +Zealand is the second group of these Islands. It<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">[203]</a></span> +is another autonomous British colony, called, since +1907 "<span class="smcap">The Dominion of New Zealand</span>".</p> + +<p>Those two Dominions have a combined territorial +area of more than 3,000,000 square miles—almost +as large as the whole of Europe—with a +population of six millions rapidly increasing. +Their two largest cities, Sydney and Melbourne, +each having a population of 700,000, are great +commercial centres.</p> + +<p>If British Imperialism has had anything to +do with the bringing of Australia and New Zealand +under British Sovereignty, it must be admitted +by all fair minded men that it has worked its way +in the most pacific manner. Deservedly renowned +British explorers—Cook, Vancouver, and others—discovered +and took possession of the Oceanic continent +in the name of their Sovereign. Welcomed +by the aboriginal tribes, they raised the British +flag over the fair land of such a promising future +in the latter end of the eighteenth century—Cook +in 1770. It has ever since been graciously waving, +by the sweet breeze of the Pacific, over one of the +happiest peoples on earth, enjoying the blessings of +interior peace and all the advantages of the political +liberties conferred upon these great colonies, +more than half a century ago. As a matter of fact, +England has organized her Australasian possessions +into free autonomous colonies at the very +dawn of their political life, dating from the middle +of the last century, when they began that splendid +progressive advance developing more and more +every year.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">[204]</a></span></p> + +<p>Is it not evident, beyond the shadow of a +doubt, that the settlement of the Australasian +colonies by England, so satisfactory and so promising, +has not been brought about by the illegitimate +ambition of an unmeasured Sovereign +aggrandizement by a guilty sort of Imperialism.</p> + +<p>The establishment of British Sovereignty in +the Indian country, immense in extent, wealth and +population, is one of the greatest events of the +historical development of the British Empire.</p> + +<p>I shall not say that all that took place in the +government of India deserves a blind approval. +That British authority was much too long left in +the control of a company was a misfortune. Under +such a regime abuses were sure to develop and increase. +They did and were energetically denounced—more +especially on that day when +Sheridan rose to such an eloquence, in the House +of Lords, that a motion of adjournment had to be +carried, to allow the peers to recover the free control +of their minds before rendering judgment in +the case brought before their tribunal, impeaching +Warren Hastings.</p> + +<p>The rule of the Indian Company was abolished, +in 1858, by <i>The Government of India Act</i>.</p> + +<p>In 1876, the illustrious Disraëli—Lord Beaconsfield—took +the statesmanlike decision of adding +a new prestige to the British Crown and to the +Sovereign wearing it. He had Parliament to adopt +the <i>Royal Titles Act</i>, by which Her Majesty Queen +Victoria was proclaimed <span class="smcap">Empress of India</span>.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">[205]</a></span></p> + +<p>Such, in due course, and without any trouble, +was accomplished that great political evolution +which substituted, for populations numbering +more than three hundred millions of human beings, +an Imperial system in place of the deplorable government +by a company. For the last sixty years, +the new regime has given peace, order and prosperity +to India.</p> + +<p>A French publicist wrote as follows:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>After troubles of nine centuries duration, India has recovered +peace under the tutelage of England, the best colonizer of the +peoples of Europe. England has rendered an evident service to +India. She has freed her from the intestine wars tearing her since +her historical origin; she has given her a police and an administrative +system.</p></div> + +<p>Nations, like individuals, are not perfect. To +judge equitably, impartially, the government by a +Metropolis of the regions under her Sovereignty, +one must not only be scandalized at her failings, +but must take the broader view of her whole history +in appreciating its final good and commendable +results. So judging the government of India by +England, every impartial mind must conclude that, +on the whole—and more especially for the last +sixty years—it has been beneficient. It promises +to be still more so, as a consequence of the admirable +share India is taking in the present war.</p> + +<p>Egypt and the Soudan have a territorial area +of 1,335,000 square miles, with a population of +15,000,000. I pride to be one of those who congratulate +Great Britain to have freed the ancient +and glorious Egyptian country from Turkish tyranny.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">[206]</a></span> +A proclamation, dated the 18th of December, +1914, has finally placed Egypt under England's +protectorate with the agreement of France.</p> + +<p>In the chapters respecting the Soudanese and +South African wars, I have shown how satisfactory +has been the rule of Great Britain in those +African countries.</p> + +<p>It being ever true that the earth was Providentially +created for men to live in the legitimate +enjoyment of the blessings of peace multiplied by +the fruits of their labours, the Egyptians and the +Soudaneses have every reason to congratulate +themselves for their liberation from the Turkish +barbarous yoke, and for the protection they receive +from one of the most civilizing nations.</p> + +<p>I sincerely believe that this short review of the +respective situation of five of the principal component +parts of the British Empire, is sufficient +to form the honest conviction that if England has +practised Imperialism, she has done so for the +real benefit of the peoples living under the ægis of +her Sovereignty, the most favourable to colonial +political liberty.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">[207]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXIII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">British Imperialism and Political Liberty.</span></h3> + + +<p>British history, for the last century and more, +proves that Imperialism is not naturally incompatible +with Political Liberty, nor with the respect +due the national aspirations of divers ethnical +groups. The unity and the consolidation of the +Empire made their greatest strides since the close +of the war which resulted in the independence of +the neighbouring Republic. As previously explained, +they were the outcome of the very wise +and statesmanlike change of colonial policy then +adopted by England. The days were to come when +they would be put to the severest test and would +prove more than equal to its greatest strain. +Those are the days which the British Empire +is living through, with brilliancy and heroism, +amidst the dazzling lightning and the roaring +thunder of an unprecedented military conflict, +with every prospect of surviving its sufferings and +sacrifices with a still stronger political structure.</p> + +<p>The same evolution by which Great Britain +was to reach the summit of Political Liberty by +the final triumph of the new constitutional principle +of ministerial responsibility, was spreading +to her far overseas Colonies. Canada, Australia,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">[208]</a></span> +New Zealand, South Africa, Newfoundland were +successively granted constitutional charters based +on the same principles as those of the institutions +of the United Kingdom.</p> + +<p>As I have already said, Imperialism becomes +dangerous and deserves the severest condemnation, +only where and when it is the instrument of +autocratic absolutism. It causes me no alarm +whatever when it is developed under free institutions, +guaranteed and protected by ministerial +responsibility.</p> + +<p>Whatever said to the contrary, by prejudiced +and designing writers, imbued with the extravagant +notions of a narrow and fanatical "Nationalism", +Canada, the most important of the autonomous +Colonies of the British Empire, is freer than +ever. Like all the other nations, she suffers +from disastrous events shaking the whole worldly +edifice, but she is none the less the absolute mistress +of the initiative of whatever efforts she considers +her duty to make under those trying circumstances. +England has imposed nothing upon +Canada, has asked nothing from Canada, since the +beginning of the war. She has, of course, accepted, +with much pleasure and gratitude, the help we +have freely offered and given her. Let our "Nationalists", +in their inspired unfairness, say, if +they like, that Canada, like all the Allies defensively +fighting, was forced in the conflict by the +imperious necessity of the situation created by +those who expected to reach the goal of their ambition.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">[209]</a></span> +But they have no right to charge Great +Britain to have coerced the Dominion, against her +will, to join in the struggle which the British +Government had done their utmost to prevent.</p> + +<p>If it was not giving to this work too wide a +range, I would like to undertake an historical +sketch of all the good the British constitutional +system has produced in the United Kingdom and +in the Colonies. I shall quote only a few of the +most important examples.</p> + +<p>In my opinion, the one development in England's +history, since the close of the eighteenth +century, most interesting to the French Canadians, +is certainly that which resulted in the emancipation +of the Roman Catholics of the United +Kingdom.</p> + +<p>To persuade my French Canadian countrymen +of the good to be wrought by the patriotic use of +the British institutions, I explained to them that at +the beginning of the last century, the Roman Catholics +of the United Kingdom enjoyed no political +rights. They were neither electors, nor eligible to +the House of Commons. They asked that justice +be done to them. True statesmen, high and fair +minded, admitted the justice of their claims and +supported them. The ensuing political contest +lasted more than twenty years.</p> + +<p>To obtain the proposed change in the long +standing laws of the realm from an exclusively +Protestant electorate, was indeed a great task +to accomplish. The public men supporting the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">[210]</a></span> +Roman Catholics' claims were courageous and eloquent. +They carried the day. Have not the true +friends of political freedom every reason to congratulate +themselves that a great measure of justice +granting political rights to Roman Catholics +was voted by an Electorate and a Parliament +exclusively Protestant.</p> + +<p>King George IV, through fear that his Royal +prerogative might be impaired by the change, was +hostile to it. He was persuaded to agree to the +measure by Sir Robert Peel, the life long opponent +of Roman Catholic emancipation. Whatever +were the religious convictions and feelings of Sir +Robert Peel, he was a statesman of a high class. +As all the leading public men of England, he had a +broad conception of the duties of the chief adviser +of the Crown, and of the true spirit of the British +constitution. The voice of the nation having +spoken in no uncertain sounds, the national will +must be followed. He plainly said so to His +Majesty who yielded. Then, in a most admirable +speech, he—Sir Robert Peel—moved himself the +passing of the bill granting justice to the Roman +Catholics, carried it through the two Houses of +Parliament and had it sanctioned by the King.</p> + +<p>A great act of national justice always receives +its due reward. The Roman Catholics have +been faithful and loyal subjects. George IV and +his successors have lived to see many evident +proofs of their loyal devotion, more especially +since the opening of the present war.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_211" id="Page_211">[211]</a></span></p> + +<p>The final success of the free discussion of the +question of granting to the Roman Catholics of +the United Kingdom all the rights enjoyed by the +British subjects of all the other religious denominations, +carried in spite of difficulties not easily +overcome, is certainly one of the greatest and most +honorable triumphs that Political Liberty has +ever obtained. I was often deeply moved at reading +the historic account of that most interesting +debate in Parliament, on the public platform and +in the press. More and more, the conviction was +firmly impressed on my mind and soul that a great +people accomplishing a grand act of justice gives +a most salutary example to posterity deserving +the admiration and gratitude of all generations to +come.</p> + +<p>I was only appreciating with justice and fairness +the part played by England in Canada, in telling +my French Canadian countrymen that they enjoyed +the political rights of British subjects many +years before the same privileges and justice was +granted to the Roman Catholics of the United +Kingdom. That much in answer to the charge of +our fanatical extremists that England and her +Government always wanted to oppress the French +Canadians on account of their religious faith.</p> + +<p>Without going back to the eventful days of +<i>Magna Charta</i> and of the <i>Bill of Rights</i>, both embodying +the fundamental constitutional principles +which were finally bound to overcome the last +pretentions of absolutism of yore, I considered a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">[212]</a></span> +short review, in broad lines, of the work performed +by the British Electorate and the Imperial Parliament, +during the last century, would help in destroying +in the minds of my French readers the +prejudices forced upon them by "Nationalist" +writers. That great work is principally illustrated +by eight important measures of general interest.</p> + +<p>I have just mentioned that most honourable +one emancipating the Roman Catholics of Great +Britain.</p> + +<p>Shortly after, it was followed by that abolishing +the Corn Laws after a protracted and very +interesting discussion. That important measure +was also carried on the proposition of the same +Sir Robert Peel, for a long time its determined +opponent. The manufacturing population, increasing +so rapidly, would soon have been starved by +the continuously augmenting cost of bread. Sir +Robert Peel foresaw the fearful consequences sure +to ensue, if no relief was granted to millions +threatened with hunger. He was, as I have already +said, too much of a statesman to hesitate in +doing his duty. He gave up his own opinion and +advised his Sovereign to do away with the Corn +Laws, the repeal of which he had Parliament to +vote.</p> + +<p>With the advent of Queen Victoria, ministerial +responsibility for all the acts of the Sovereign +became definitely the fundamental principle of +the British constitution.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">[213]</a></span></p> + +<p>Complete ministerial responsibility, once fully +recognized in Great Britain, was without delay +granted to all the British colonies having representative +institutions.</p> + +<p>The abolition of slavery all over the British +Empire is, every one must admit, a political development +of first magnitude, one doing the greatest +possible honour to the great nation having first +taken the glorious initiative of granting to the +black race the justice ordered by Christianity. +It is undoubtedly a very valuable reform to the +credit of England.</p> + +<p>The Imperial Parliament realized that the +constitutional regime of the United Kingdom +could not bear all the fruits to be expected from +it with an electorate restricted to privileged +classes. To support such a splendid edifice, admirable +in structure and strength, a larger basic +foundation, more solid, laid deep in the national +soil, was required. After a long political struggle, +freedom was once more triumphant in the Motherland. +The first great Reform Bill of 1832 was the +starting point of successive legislative enactments, +enlarging the franchise, calling to the exercise of +political rights various classes of the people, bringing +up the British electorate to the glorious standard +of being one of the freest, the most enlightened, +and most independent in the world. The crowning +measure of this extensive political reform has +been the Bill of 1917 providing for the addition of +some 8,000,000 voters to the roll, including about +6,000,000 women.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">[214]</a></span></p> + +<p>The rotten boroughs of old were abolished +and replaced by a much better redistribution of +electoral divisions.</p> + +<p>Dating from 1867, great autonomous federal +colonies, with full Sovereign rights in the administration +of all their interior affairs, have been +created by Imperial charters. The Canadian, +Australian, South African, and New Zealand +Dominions, of a total territorial area exceeding +7,000,000 square miles, with a total population of +over 25,000,000, nearly 20,000,000 of which belong +to the white race, have commenced their new political +career with all the confidence and the hopes +inspired by their free institutions.</p> + +<p>Finally, the Imperial Parliament passed a +law granting Home Rule to Ireland. Unfortunately, +the war, so disastrous in many ways, prevented +the immediate carrying out of the will of Parliament, +certainly representative of that of the +nation. But this vexed question must at last be +settled once for all. It is to be hoped that the day +is not far distant when it will be removed from the +political arena by a solution satisfactory to Ireland, +to England and to the whole Empire.</p> + +<p>Besides all those very important measures of +political reform, the British Parliament has +passed many laws of urgent social improvement.</p> + +<p>The crowning act of the Imperial Parliament +has been its determined attitude for the maintenance +of peace through a long series of years.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">[215]</a></span></p> + +<p>If all the above enumeration of measures of +widespread influence for the general good is to be +called Imperialism, I say without hesitation that +it is an Imperialism worth favouring. The world +will never have too much of it.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">[216]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXIV.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Imperial Federation and "Bourassism".</span></h3> + + +<p>The leader of our "Nationalists," always +frightened, apparently at least, with the supposed +dangers of further Imperialist encroachments detrimental +to the best interests of the British autonomous +Colonies, seems alarmed at the prospects +to follow the close of the hostilities. Consequently, +it has been a part of his campaign to bring the +French Canadians to share his fears for their +future.</p> + +<p>Not in the least worried by such apprehensions, +it was also my duty to try and persuade my +French Canadian compatriots not to be unduly +disturbed by the sayings of a publicist magnifying +the errors of his excited imagination.</p> + +<p>That there will be after-the-war problems to +consider, is most likely. What will they be? It is +very difficult to foresee just now with sufficient +definiteness. So much will depend upon the general +conditions of the restoration of peace. However, +broad lines have, for the last four years, been +outlined with fair clearness permitting a general +view of what is likely to happen.</p> + +<p>Let us for a moment examine the traces of the +initial phases of the constitutional developments<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">[217]</a></span> +likely to be the outcome of the joint effort of the +whole Empire to win the war.</p> + +<p>The second chapter of the Report of the War +Cabinet for the year 1917—already quoted somewhat +extensively—deals with the new aspect of +Imperial Affairs more especially the consequence +of the war. The opening paragraph partly reads +as follows:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The outstanding event of the year in the sphere of Imperial +Affairs has been the inauguration of the Imperial War Cabinet. +This has been the direct outcome of the manner in which all parts +of the Empire had thrown themselves into the war during the +preceding years. Impalpable as was the bond which bound this +great group of peoples together, there was never any doubt about +their loyalty to the Commonwealth to which they belonged and to +the cause to which it was committed by the declaration of war. +Without counting the cost to themselves, they offered their men +and their treasure in defence of freedom and public right. From +the largest and most prosperous Dominion to the smallest island +the individual and national effort has been one of continuous and +unreserved generosity.</p></div> + +<p>After mentioning that during 1917 "great +progress has been made in the organisation both +of the man-power and other resources of the Empire +for the prosecution of the war," and that "the +British Army is now a truly Imperial Army, containing +units from almost every part of the +Empire," the Report says:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>The real development, however, of 1917 has been in the +political sphere, and it has been the result of the intense activity +of all parts of the Empire in prosecuting the war since August, +1914.</p> + +<p>It had been felt for some time that, in view of the ever-increasing +part played by the Dominions in the war, it was necessary +that their Governments should not only be informed as fully +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">[218]</a></span>as was possible of the situation, but that, as far as was practicable, +they should participate, on a basis of complete equality, in the +deliberations which determined the main outlines of Imperial +policy.</p></div> + +<p>Accordingly, a Special War Conference was +convened to meet in London, where for practical +convenience it was divided into two parts: one, +"known as the Imperial War Cabinet, which consisted +of the Oversea Representatives and the +members of the British War Cabinet sitting +together as an Imperial War Cabinet for deliberation +about the conduct of the war and for the +discussion of the larger issues of Imperial policy +connected with the war." The other "was the +Imperial War Conference, presided over by the +Secretary of State for the Colonies, which consisted +of the Oversea Representatives and a number +of other ministers, which discussed non-war +problems connected with the war but of lesser +importance."</p> + +<p>On the 17th May, 1917, the British Prime +Minister, giving "to the House of Commons a short +appreciation of the work of the Imperial War +Cabinet," said in part:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>I ought to add that the institution in its present form is +extremely elastic. It grew, not by design, but out of the necessities +of the war. The essence of it is that the responsible heads of the +Governments of the Empire, with those Ministers who are +specially entrusted with the conduct of Imperial Policy should meet +together at regular intervals to confer about foreign policy and +matters connected therewith, and come to decisions in regard to +them which, subject to the control of their own Parliaments, they +will then generally execute. By this means they will be able to +obtain full information about all aspects of Imperial affairs, and +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">[219]</a></span>to determine by consultation together the policy of the Empire in +its most vital aspects, without infringing in any degree the autonomy +which its parts at present enjoy. To what constitutional +developments this may lead we did not attempt to settle. The +whole question of perfecting the mechanism of "continuous consultation" +about Imperial and foreign affairs between the "autonomous +nations of an Imperial Commonwealth" will be reserved +for the consideration of that special Conference which will be +summoned as soon as possible after the war to readjust the constitutional +relations of the Empire. We felt, however, that the +experiment of consulting an Imperial Cabinet in which India was +represented had been so fruitful in better understanding and in +unity of purpose and action that it ought to be perpetuated, and +we believe that this proposal will commend itself to the judgment +of all the nations of the Empire.</p></div> + +<p>The preceding are words of political wisdom, +worthy of the best form of British statesmanship. +Were they the dawn of a new era, dissipating the +clouds accumulated by the trials of a long period +of military conflict, and showing in a future, more +or less distant, the rising constitutional fabric of +a still greater Imperial Commonwealth, not so +much in size, than in unity, in freedom and +strength? Time will tell. But can we not at once +note with confidence that the fundamental principle +upheld by all the leading British public men is +that, whatever constitutional developments may +be in store for us all, they will not be allowed to +infringe "in any degree the autonomy" presently +enjoyed by the Oversea Dominions.</p> + +<p>The Imperial War Conference held in London, +last year, passed the following very important +"Resolution" dealing with the future constitutional +organisation of the Empire:<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_220" id="Page_220">[220]</a></span>—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"The Imperial War Conference are of opinion that the readjustment +of the constitutional relations of the component parts +of the Empire is too important and intricate a subject to be dealt +with during the war, and that it should form the subject of a +special Imperial Conference to be summoned as soon as possible +after the cessation of hostilities.</p> + +<p>"They deem it their duty; however, to place on record their +view that any such readjustment, while thoroughly preserving all +existing powers of self-government and complete control of domestic +affairs, should be based on a full recognition of the +Dominions as autonomous nations of an Imperial Commonwealth, +and of India as an important portion of the same, should recognise +the right of the Dominions and India to an adequate voice in +foreign policy and in foreign relations, and should provide effective +arrangements for continuous consultation in all important matters +of common Imperial concern and for such necessary concerted +action, founded on consultation, as the several Governments may +determine."</p></div> + +<p>We can await without the slightest alarm the +holding of the proposed "<i>special Imperial Conference +to be summoned as soon as possible after +the cessation of the hostilities</i>." The fundamental +principles upon which "<i>the readjustment</i>," if any +one is made, "o<i>f the constitutional relations of the +component parts of the Empire</i>" are to rest, are +well defined in the above "Resolution":—<i>through +preservation of "all existing powers of self-government +and complete control of domestic affairs</i>;—<i>full +recognition of the Dominions as autonomous +nations of an Imperial Commonwealth, and of +India as an important portion of the same</i>";—the +admission of "<i>the right of the Dominions and India +to an adequate voice in foreign policy and in +foreign relations</i>."</p> + +<p>Upon that large and strong basis, I, for one,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">[221]</a></span> +am ready to wait with patience and confidence the +result of the deliberations of the future special +Imperial Conference. With regard to the proposed +Conference, I cannot see any reason for anyone +to indulge in the "Nationalist" hysterical fears +of an oppressive Imperialism devouring, as the old +mythological god—Saturn—his own children.</p> + +<p>As I have said, the work of the special Imperial +Conference will be rendered more or less +easy by the conditions of the future peace. I pray, +with all the fervour of my soul, that the war shall +not end by a hasty compromise—as wished for by +our blind, if not really disloyal, pacifists—by +which the world would be doomed to another disaster +far worse than the one it is straining every +nerve to overcome, and that after years of the most +costly warlike preparations. Such a peace would +be the saddest possible conclusion of the present +conflict, and much worse than the sacrifices yet to +be borne by the prosecution of the war to a finish. +We must all implore Providence to save Humanity +from such a cataclysm.</p> + +<p>A special Imperial Conference meeting under +such disheartening circumstances would indeed +have a most difficult task to accomplish. It was +evidently an act of wisdom on the part of the Imperial +War Conference of last year to express the +opinion that the special Imperial Conference +should be summoned only after the cessation of +hostilities.</p> + +<p>When peace shall have been restored with the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">[222]</a></span> +only conditions which can be satisfactory to the +Allies and to the world at large, a special Imperial +Conference will be in order, having for its object +to consider the readjustment of the constitutional +relations of the component parts of the Empire, in +conformity with the requirements of the new situation +which will have grown out of the necessities +of the war. However important the task, the +tranquility of the world being, let us hope, assured +for many long years, there will be no reason for the +Conference to proceed hastily to any insufficiently +matured conclusion. The representative public +men who will meet in London from all over the +Empire will not forget, we may rest confident, that +the safest way to a good working readjustment +will be, as it has always been in the past, that +which will follow the straight line of natural +growth. Dry cut resolutions, imprudently adopted, +and pressed upon unwilling populations would +have ninety-nine chances out of a hundred to be +more injurious than profitable.</p> + +<p>Every sensible man must acknowledge that +the war has in an extraordinary manner hastened +the rapidity of the advance towards the turning +point in the Constitutional organization of the +British Empire. The day is near at hand when +the problem will have to be faced with courage and +broadness of mind. Very blind indeed, and far +behind the times, is he who does not realize that +<span class="smcap">TO BE</span>, OR <span class="smcap">NOT TO BE</span>, for the Empire, is confined to +two clear words: <span class="smcap">CONSOLIDATION</span> or <span class="smcap">DISSOLUTION</span>.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">[223]</a></span> +The tide has either to ebb or flow, the wave to advance +or recede. The edifice must be strengthened +or left to decay. Like any living being, a political +society, be it great or small, after its birth, more +or less laborious, grows to a prosperous and +healthy old age, or crumbles down prematurely. +Very much depends, for either course, on the wisdom +or extravagance of the way of passing through +life. Unmeasured ambitions, wild expectations, +are too often, alike for the individual and the nation, +the surest road to a lamentable ruin. Wisdom, +the outcome of sound moral principles, and +wide experience, is, on the other hand, the safest +guarantee of longevity, of bright old days full of +contentment, honour, prestige and true grandeur.</p> + +<p>Grave will be the responsibility of those who +will meet in solemn conclave to lay down the foundations +of the future British Imperial Commonwealth. +No less serious will be the responsibility +of the populations, scattered over the five continents, +who will be called upon to pronounce, freely +and finally, upon the propositions which will be +submitted to their approval or disavowal. Consequently +undue haste would be more than ill-advised.</p> + +<p>For instance, the paramount question to be +considered by the new Imperial Conference will +most likely be that of the future military organization +of the Empire. Is it not evident that this +problem will be much more easily settled if the +Allied nations succeed in carrying the point they<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">[224]</a></span> +have the most at heart:—The reduction of permanent +armaments as the safest protection against +any new outburst of savage militarism flooding +the earth of God with human blood. If this <i>sine +qua non</i> condition is the top article of the future +peace treaty, the great Powers having agreed, in +honour bound, to maintain the world's tranquillity +and order, will all be afforded the blessings of a +long rest from the ruinous military expenditures +too long imposed upon them by the mad run of +Germany to conquer universal domination. The +British Empire, as a whole, will, as much as any +other nation, enjoy the full benefits of such a +favourable situation. She will, like her Allies, +return to the pursuits of peace, with millions of +veteran soldiers who, for the next ten years at +least, would, in large numbers, certainly join the +Colours once more, if need be, to defend their country +in a new just war. Then, under such circumstances, +why should the peoples of the whole Empire +be immediately called upon to incur more +expenses for military purposes than absolutely +necessary for the maintenance of interior order, +and to meet any sudden and unforeseen emergency.</p> + +<p>The liquidation of the obligations necessarily +accumulated during the war will be the first duty +of all the Allied nations. The task will no doubt +be very large, most onerous. Still I trust that it +will not be beyond their resources of natural +wealth, of capital and labour, of courageous +savings.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">[225]</a></span></p> + +<p>As the "Resolution" adopted by the Imperial +War Conference says, "the readjustment of the +constitutional relations of the component parts of +the Empire is too important and intricate a subject +to be dealt with during the war." When +taken up after the war—even if just <i>as soon as +possible</i>—it will be none the less <span class="smcap">IMPORTANT AND +INTRICATE</span>. Such a subject should not be dealt +with without matured consideration and given a +hasty solution. If the peace treaty satisfactorily +settles the world's situation for a long future of +general tranquillity which will certainly bless all +the nations with many years of unprecedented +prosperity, plenty of time will be afforded to deliberate +wisely upon the paramount question of the +building of a "new and greater Imperial Commonwealth." +Our frenzied "Nationalists" can quiet +their nerves. The imperialist wild bear will not +be growling at the door. Because we are all likely +to be called upon to consider how best to promote +the unity and the future prosperity of the Empire, +we will have no reason to fear that we shall be, +from one day to the other, forcibly thrown into +perilous adventures by the Machiavellic machinations +of out and out Imperialist enthusiasts.</p> + +<p>I have already said that it is becoming more +and more evident that <span class="smcap">TO BE</span>, or <span class="smcap">NOT TO BE</span>, the +British Empire must either <span class="smcap">CONSOLIDATE</span> or <span class="smcap">DISSOLVE</span>. +I must not be understood to mean that +with the restoration of peace under the happy +conditions all the Allies are fighting for, the Empire,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">[226]</a></span> +as she will emerge from the tornado, could +not, as a whole, resume, for more or less time, her +prosperous existence of <i>ante</i>-war days. What will +be best to do, it is too early to foresee. Then it is +better to wait for the issue of the war, trusting +that all the truly loyal British subjects will then +join together to pronounce upon whatever questions +of imperial concern will claim their urgent +consideration.</p> + +<p>But there is a certainty that can be at once +positively affirmed. All the peoples living and +developing under the ægis of the British flag are +determined that the British Empire is to be. +Whenever a special Imperial Conference sits in +London, all the representatives of the many component +parts of the British Commonwealth will +meet in the great Capital surely to deliberate over +the most practical means <span class="smcap">to consolidate the +Empire</span>. We may all depend that no one will +propose to destroy it.</p> + +<p>How best to consolidate the Empire, such will +be the important question. To be sure, the future +special Conference will not likely be wanting in +propositions from many outside would-be constitutional +framers. Schemes may be numerous, +some worth considering, others useless if not mischievous. +No reason to feel uneasy and to worry +about them. We can confidently hope that British +statesmanship will be equal to the new task it will +be called upon to perform. Our Canadian public +men will have much to gain by closer intercourse<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_227" id="Page_227">[227]</a></span> +with their Imperial colleagues, and by judging +great questions from a higher standpoint.</p> + +<p>Let there be no mistake about it: the true +secret of the most effective consolidation of the +Empire was discovered by the British statesmen +the day when they realized that henceforth free +institutions and the largest possible measure of +colonial autonomy were the only sure means to +solidify the structure of the British Commonwealth. +Such is the opinion of the Imperial War +Conference outlining in their previously quoted +"Resolution" what must be the fundamental basis +of any future "<span class="smcap">readjustment of the constitutional +relations of the component parts of the +Empire</span>."</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">Constitutional Development of India.</span></div> + +<p>As a preliminary to the prospective readjustment +of the political status of the Empire, it is +worth noting the advance of India towards political +autonomy. It was made manifest by the +significant step of inviting India to the deliberations +of the Imperial War Cabinet, and by the +"Resolution" adopted by the Imperial War Conference +that India must be fully represented at all +future Imperial Conferences.</p> + +<p>Respecting India, the Report of the War +Cabinet, for the year 1917, says:<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">[228]</a></span>—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>It was clear, however, that this recognition of the new +status of India in the Empire would necessarily be followed by +substantial progress towards internal self-government. Accordingly, +on August 20th, the following important declaration of His +Majesty's Government on this subject was made in the House of +Commons by the Secretary of State for India:—</p> + +<p>"The policy of His Majesty's Government, with which the +Government of India are in complete accord, is that of the increasing +association of Indians in every branch of the administration +and the gradual development of self-governing institutions +with a view to the progressive realization of responsible government +in India as an integral part of the British Empire. They +have decided that substantial steps in this direction should be +taken as soon as possible, and that it is of the highest importance, +as a preliminary to considering what these steps should be, that +there should be a free and informal exchange of opinion between +those in authority at home and in India. His Majesty's Government +have accordingly decided, with His Majesty's approval, +that I should accept the Viceroy's invitation to proceed to India +to discuss these matters with the Viceroy and the Government of +India, to consider with the Viceroy the views of local Governments, +and to receive with him the suggestions of representative +bodies and others. I would add that progress in this policy can +only be achieved by successive stages. The British Government +and the Government of India on whom the responsibility lies for +the welfare and advancement of the Indian peoples, must be the +judges of the time and measure of each advance, and they must +be guided by the co-operation received from those upon whom +new opportunities of service will thus be conferred and by the +extent to which it is found that confidence can be reposed in their +sense of responsibility. Ample opportunity will be afforded for +public discussion of the proposals, which will be submitted in due +course to Parliament."</p> + +<p>In accordance with this declaration, the Secretary of State +left for India in October, and has since been in consultation with +the Government of India and deputations representative of all +interests and parties in India in regard to the advances which +should be made in Indian constitutional development in the immediate +future. No reports as to the results of these discussions had +been made public by the end of the year.</p> + +<p>Another important decision relating to India was that +whereby the Government abandoned the rule which confines the +granting of commissions in the Indian army to officers of British +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">[229]</a></span>extraction. A number of Indian officers, who have served with +distinction in the war, have already received commissions.</p></div> + +<p>Who, only twenty years ago, would have believed +that the day was so near at hand when this +Asiatic vast and populous country, called India, +would be most earnestly considering, through +numerous representatives, in consultation with the +British Government, the proper steps to be taken +"<span class="smcap">for the gradual development of self-governing +institutions with a view to the progressive +realization of responsible government in India +as an integral part of the British Empire</span>." In +every way, it is a most extraordinary political +evolution. If it reaches the admirable conclusion +aimed at—for which success every true friend of +Political Liberty will fervently pray—it will have +realized one of the greatest constitutional achievements +of modern times.</p> + +<p>Behold just now how safely and wisely this +Indian evolution is proceeding under the experienced +direction of British statesmanship. It is +"<span class="smcap">to be achieved by successive stages</span>", declares the +Secretary of State for India, speaking in the name +of the whole British responsible Cabinet. Such +have been accomplished all the constitutional developments +which have wrought so much perfection +for British free institutions.</p> + +<p>True progress, in every form, is never revolutionary. +And why? For the very reason that instead +of fighting for destruction by brute force, +it aims at perfecting by regular advances in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">[230]</a></span> +right direction, by successive improvements which +experience justifies, which reason, intelligence and +wisdom approve, which political sense recommends, +which sound moral principles authorize +and sanction.</p> + +<p>A country favoured with the free British constitutional +regime is not the land where bolshevikism +of any grade or stamp, can flourish and bear +fruits of desolation and shame.</p> + +<p>The wonderful Indian country, for so many +centuries tortured by intestine troubles, at last +rescued by England from that barbarous situation, +given a reorganized administration able to maintain +interior peace, favoured by British business +experience and capital with material progress in +many ways, specially in transportation facilities, +may soon see—let us hope—the dawn of the glorious +days of a large measure of political freedom +and responsible government.</p> + +<p>Far away indeed from the perilous Imperialism +abhorred by our much depressed "Nationalists" +is India safely moving.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">[231]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXVII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Future Constitutional Relations of the +Empire.</span></h3> + + +<p>Though very difficult to say what they will be, +I thought proper, for the better information of my +French Canadian readers, to consider some of the +suggestions which of late years have been repeatedly +made.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa, in his recent pamphlets, reviewing +the situation from his wrong and prejudiced +standpoint, has decidedly come out in +favour of Canadian Independence. The least that +can be said is that the time was very badly chosen +to raise the question. To select the moment when +the Motherland was engaged in a fight for life or +death, to propose to run away from the assailed +home where we had lived many happy years, was +certainly not an inspiration of loyal devotion and +gratitude. I am glad to say that the wild proposition +met with no countenance on the part of our +French Canadian compatriots.</p> + +<p>To the point raised in England, some years +ago, that it was not to be supposed that the British +Empire was destined to exist forever, one of the +leading British statesmen of the day, then a member +of the Cabinet, answered that, though it was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">[232]</a></span> +likely to be true that the British Commonwealth +would not be eternal, like many other great political +societies of times gone by, it was surely not the +particular duty of a British minister to do his +best to hasten the day of the final downfall of the +country he was sworn to maintain. The rejoinder +was no doubt peremptory. It can very properly +be used in answer to Mr. Bourassa's plea for the +independence of Canada.</p> + +<p>However, the question having been so unwisely +raised, to say the least, for the obvious purpose +of disheartening the French Canadians from their +present situation and raising in their minds extravagant +hopes of a change for the better, I +believed it advisable to tell them not to be carried +away by dreams of a too far distant possible +realization.</p> + +<p>In all frankness, I must say that I have never +taken any stock in the suggestion made from time +to time, for the last fifty years, in favour of Canadian +Independence. It always seemed to me that +our destinies were not moving along that way. In +my opinion, which nothing has happened to alter, +the steady growth of the consolidation of the Empire +was yearly working against the assumption +of the prospective independence of the Dominion.</p> + +<p>But even supposing that the course of events +would change and put an end to British connection, +could we pride ourselves with having at last, +though in a very peaceful way, achieved our +national independence? I am more and more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">[233]</a></span> +strongly impressed by the paramount consideration +that, nominally independent, Canada would +be very little so in reality. Situated as she would +be, she could not help being under the protectorate +of the United States. I have always thought so. +I think it more firmly than ever, when I see looming +larger every day on the American political +horizon the fact that the neighbouring Republic +will come out of the present war with flying +Colours, taking rank as one of the most powerful +nations on earth.</p> + +<p>Be that as it may, there is every certainty +that the question of Canadian Independence is +not within the range of practical politics. Mr. +Bourassa's proposition is doomed to the failure it +deserves.</p> + +<p>Consequently, it is much better to try and +foresee what the future political conditions of +Canada are more likely to be after the close of the +hostilities. And this must be done with the only +purpose of wisely, and patriotically,—in the larger +sense of the word—contributing our due share to +the sound and solid framing of the changes, if any, +which the best interests of the Empire, generally, +and of all her component parts, in particular, may +require.</p> + +<p>We have not, and I most earnestly hope and +pray that we shall not have, to consider what new +political conditions would be as the consequence +of the defeat of the Allies, or even as necessitated +by a peace treaty due to a compromise. We must<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">[234]</a></span> +only look ahead for the encouraging days to follow +the victory won by the united efforts and heroism +of the nations who have rallied to put an end to +Prussian militarism.</p> + +<p>One certainty is daily becoming more evident. +All loyal British subjects will applaud the triumphant +close of the war with the desire to do their +best to maintain and consolidate the Empire they +will have saved from destruction at the cost of so +much sacrifices of heroic lives and resources.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">No Taxation Without Representation.</span></div> + +<p>The great objection raised by Mr. Bourassa +against the participation of Canada in the wars of +the Empire is that the Dominion is not represented +in the Parliament to which the British ministers, +advising the Sovereign on all matters of foreign +relations, are responsible. He draws the conclusion +that the Colonies are called upon to pay for +the war expenditures of Great Britain in violation +of the constitutional principle:—<span class="smcap">no taxation +without representation</span>. The principle is no +doubt true. But it is altogether wrong to pretend +that so far it has been violated to coerce the Dominion +to participate in the wars which England +has been obliged to wage. Our "Nationalists" +would be right in their opposition if the Imperial +Parliament had attempted to pass laws compelling +the autonomous Colonies to contribute men and +money to a conflict. Had they claimed the right to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">[235]</a></span> +raise revenues in Canada by an Imperial statute, +we would certainly have been entitled to affirm +that not being represented in the British House of +Commons, we could not be taxed in any way for +any Imperial purpose—war or others.</p> + +<p>Nothing of the kind has ever been done, ever +been attempted, even ever been hinted at.</p> + +<p>The argument falls entirely to the ground, +shattered to pieces, from the fact that Canada has +only participated in the wars of the Empire of her +own free will, in the full enjoyment of her constitutional +rights. Whatever sums of money the +Dominion has to pay for the conflicts into which +we have freely and deliberately decided to intervene, +are perceived by the Canadian treasury in +virtue of laws passed by our federal Parliament +upon the advice of our responsible Cabinet.</p> + +<p>Last year, the people of Canada were called +upon to elect new members of our House of Commons. +The citizens of the Dominion had the undoubted +constitutional right to pass condemnation +on the ministers and on the members of Parliament +who had voted for the participation in the +war with men and money. They could have elected +a new House of Commons to discontinue such +participation and recall our army from Europe. +But had they not the equally undoubted right to +do what they have done by such a solemn expression +of a decided and matured opinion:—approve +and order to fight until victory is won?</p> + +<p>In accepting with deep gratitude the noble and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">[236]</a></span> +patriotic support we, Canadians, were giving her +in the most terrible crisis of her Sovereign existence, +was England in any way violating any of our +cherished constitutional privileges? No sensible, +no reasonable, no unprejudiced man can so pretend. +The case being such as it is, there is not +the shadow of common sense in the assertion that +Canada is taxed without representation for Imperial +war purposes.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">Colonial Representation.</span></div> + +<p>If the question of Colonial representation is +raised at the special Imperial Conference to be +held as soon as possible after the war, Mr. Bourassa +and his friends will not be welcomed to cry if it +is settled very differently from their wishes, after +their unwise clamour for an excursion into the +unknown.</p> + +<p>The question of the readjustment of the constitutional +relations of the component parts of +the Empire, when duly brought up, will very likely +take a wide range, so far at least as consideration +goes. What will be the conclusions arrived at, +nobody knows.</p> + +<p>Pending that time, any one is allowed to express +his own views. I thought proper to explain +mine in my book dedicated to the French Canadians. +I now summarize them as follows:—</p> + +<p>Would it be advisable to have the Colonies represented +in the present Imperial Parliament?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">[237]</a></span> +After full consideration of the question, I must say +that I have finally dismissed it from my mind as +utterly impracticable. Can it be supposed for a +moment that the electors of Great Britain would +agree to have the Dominions overseas and India +represented in their House of Commons, to participate +in the government of the United Kingdom +for all purposes? With representation in the present +British House of Commons, would the Colonies +be also represented in the British Cabinet, to advise +the Crown on all matters respecting the good +government of England?</p> + +<p>Would the Colonies be represented according +to their population in the British House of Commons? +If they were, India alone would have a +number of representatives five times larger than +all the other parts of the Empire.</p> + +<p>Is it within the range of possibility that the +people of Great Britain would consent to colonial +representatives interfering, even controlling the +management of their internal affairs, whilst they +would have no say whatever in the internal government +of the Colonies?</p> + +<p>Would the colonial ministers in the British +Cabinet be constitutionally responsible to the people +of the United Kingdom without holding their +mandate from them?</p> + +<p>Such a system would be so absurd, so radically +impossible, that it is not necessary to argue to +prove that it would not work for one single year.</p> + +<p>In my opinion, Colonial representation would<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">[238]</a></span> +be practicable only with the creation of a new +truly Imperial Parliament, the present British +Parliament to continue to exist but with constitutional +powers reduced to the management of the +internal affairs of the United Kingdom. If such +is the scheme of the "Nationalists," then they are +converts to that Imperial Federation which they +have vehemently denounced for years, and to the +largest measure possible of that Imperialism +which has been cursed with their worst maledictions.</p> + +<p>If ever complete Imperial Federation becomes +an accomplished fact, how will it be organized? +Will the new Imperial Parliament consist of one +Sovereign, one House of Lords—or Senate—one +House of Commons?</p> + +<p>Would the Sovereign be King or Emperor? +I, for one, would prefer the word <span class="smcap">Emperor</span>. He +might be titled His Majesty the Emperor of the +British Commonwealth and the King of Great +Britain.</p> + +<p>With Imperial Federation—a regime of complete +Imperial autonomy—the word "colonies" +would no longer apply. Would Canada, Australia, +South Africa, India, New Zealand be called Kingdoms, +like Prussia, Bavaria, Saxony, Wurtemberg, +of the German Empire?</p> + +<p>Evidently, the constitutional powers of the +new Parliament would be limited to external relations, +to strictly Imperial affairs.</p> + +<p>The new constitutional organization of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_239" id="Page_239">[239]</a></span> +British Empire would combine Imperial, National +and Provincial autonomy, each operating within +the well defined limits of their respective privileges +and attributions.</p> + +<p>Under such a regime, there would be three +sorts of responsible Cabinets: The Imperial Cabinet +responsible to the whole Imperial electorate; +the National Cabinets of the component Kingdoms +of the British Empire responsible to the electorate +of each one of those Kingdoms respectively; the +Provincial Cabinets responsible to the electors of +each province respectively.</p> + +<p>The Royal—or rather Imperial—Prerogative +to declare war and to make peace would be exercised +upon the responsibility of the Imperial +Cabinet.</p> + +<p>To the new Imperial Parliament would undoubtedly +be given the right and the duty to provide +for Imperial defense. They would have to +organize an Imperial army and an Imperial navy +for the protection of the whole Empire.</p> + +<p>The whole of the reorganized Empire would +have to pay the whole of the expenditures required +for Imperial purposes, defense and others, on land +and sea, out of revenues raised by laws of the +Imperial Parliament.</p> + +<p>Under the new Imperial constitutional regime, +would the Imperial Parliament be given the authority +to regulate Imperial trade and commerce, +the Imperial postal service, &c.?</p> + +<p>Would the new Parliament have the exclusive<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">[240]</a></span> +right to approve commercial treaties sanctioned by +His Majesty the Emperor, upon the advice of his +responsible Imperial Cabinet, without reference +whatever to the National Parliaments of the +component Kingdoms?</p> + +<p>How easily is it ascertained that numerous +questions of paramount importance are at once +brought to one's mind the moment the vast problem +of a new and greater Imperial Commonwealth +is considered. Shortsighted and inexperienced +are the politicians and the publicists who imagine +that it could be given a satisfactory solution after +hasty and insufficient deliberations. It is very +reassuring to know that the matter necessarily +being suggested for consideration at the Imperial +War Conference, last year, it was immediately +decided, by a "Resolution," adopted on the proposition +of the Canadian Prime Minister, "<span class="smcap">that the +readjustment of the constitutional relations +of the component parts of the Empire is too important +and intricate a subject to be dealt with +during the war</span>."</p> + +<p>What would be the real meaning of such a +radical change? It is worth while to enquire at +once.</p> + +<p>The British Empire would no longer comprise +a Metropolis holding autonomous Colonies +and Crown Colonies, but would be organized in a +new Sovereign State with an Imperial Parliament +to which all the component parts—or Kingdoms—would +send representatives.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">[241]</a></span></p> + +<p>Indeed it would be a grand, a magnificent, +political edifice. But to find shelter under it, +Canada would have to renounce her right to decide +alone, and freely, to participate, or not, in the +wars of the Empire, to determine alone what her +military organization should be, to raise ourselves, +without the intervention of a superior Parliament, +the revenue which we consider proper to apply to +Imperial purposes.</p> + +<p>I, for one, do not foresee that such an important +constitutional change, if ever it is made, will +be suddenly brought about, in the dark, as the +result of the machinations of a most mischievous +Imperialism inspiring our "Nationalists" with +shivering terror. It is positively sure that no one +holding a responsible political position, or having +a responsible standing in the British political +world, will ever be mad enough to propose, suggest, +or even hint, to build a new Imperial structure +without the solid foundation of the deliberate +consent of all the Colonies, of all the would-be +component parts of such a vast Commonwealth.</p> + +<p>How many years of serious discussion, of +earnest consideration, did it not take to bring +about the creation of the Canadian, Australian +and South African Dominions. It cannot be reasonably +imagined that the creation of the new and +greater Imperial Commonwealth will be a much +easier task to accomplish with the necessary +conditions of successful durability.</p> + +<p>I also thought proper in my French book to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">[242]</a></span> +write a few lines on the important question respecting +the mode of ascertaining the deliberate +consent of the Colonies to any intended readjustment +of the constitutional relations of the component +parts of the Empire, specially if it was proposed +to rear a new and larger political fabric. I +did so because of late it has been frequently suggested +to use the <i>plebiscit</i> or the <i>referendum</i> as the +most opportune way to consult public opinion.</p> + +<p>I must say that, without going to the length +of denying that a public consultation may, in a +particular case, be advantageously made by way of +a <i>plebiscit</i> or <i>referendum</i>, I am not a strong believer +in the efficiency of either proposition, and +why? Because I cannot help considering them as +more or less contrary to the solid constitutional +principle of ministerial responsibility which they +would gradually undermine if frequently appealed +to.</p> + +<p>I feel specially adverse to the <i>plebiscit</i>, because +History proves that, by nature, it engenders +<span class="smcap">despotism</span>, <span class="smcap">cæsarism</span>. Contemporary history offers +two striking examples never to be forgotten.</p> + +<p>Napoleon the First, whose power was the legitimate +result of his wonderful genius and of his +eminent services to France, wanted his dynasty to +rest on the <i>plebiscitary</i> foundation. Millions of +votes—almost the unanimity of French public +opinion—answered enthusiastically to his call. +He was not such a man as to refuse the chance +offered him to exercise a supreme power so manifestly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">[243]</a></span> +tendered to him. All know that he very +soon unbridled his devouring ambition and ruled +France with all the might of an absolutism +strengthened by the glories of military campaigns +truly marvellous. To any attempt at freedom of +criticism, he could reply that his Imperial power—mightily +supported by his commanding genius—was +strongly entrenched on the unanimity of +opinion of the French nation expressed by the +result of the plebiscit.</p> + +<p>Napoleon III, favoured by the immortal prestige +of his glorious uncle, but far behind him in +genius, though intellectually well gifted, as he +proved it during his Presidential term of the second +French Republic and during the first years he +occupied the Imperial Throne of France, used the +plebiscit to have his famous <i>coup d'Etat</i> of the +second day of December 1851, prepared with consummate +skill and carried out with great energy, +ratified by the nation by an overwhelming majority +of several millions of votes. He lost no time +in drawing the final result of this first great success +and in reaching the term of his ambition. +The tide of popular enthusiasm was all flowing his +way, carrying him to the Throne elevated for his +uncle who had lost it after the hurricane which +exhausted its strength at Waterloo. On the second +of December of the following year—1852—the +second French Empire was proclaimed to the international +world. Following the example and +the precedent of the first Bonaparte, Napoleon III<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">[244]</a></span> +also decided to use the plebiscit to legitimate his +Imperial power. He triumphantly carried the +day by some seven millions of votes—almost the +unanimous voice of the French people.</p> + +<p>Thus, in less than half a century, after having +twice tried the Republican system of government, +and, in both cases, having overdone by deplorable +excesses the experiment of Political Liberty—more +specially during the years of terrorism of the first +Republic—France, by a regular reaction, went +back to the other extreme, and reestablished +arbitrary power not, in the two instances, upon +the principle of the Divine Right of the ancient +Monarchy, but on that of the Sovereignty of the +people, as expressed by the certain will of the +whole nation. But <span class="smcap">absolutism</span>, whether the outcome +of Divine Right or of popular sovereignty, +is always the same and steadily works against the +true principles of Political Liberty.</p> + +<p>It is a great mistake to suppose that <span class="smcap">absolutism</span> +is possible only under monarchical institutions. +The terrorist republican epoch, in France, from +1792 to 1795, was <span class="smcap">absolutism</span> of the worst kind, +really with a vengeance. As much can be said of +the present political situation in Russia, which +has substituted <span class="smcap">revolutionary absolutism</span> to that +of the decayed Imperial regime, suddenly brought +to a tragic end by the pressure of events too strong +for its crumbling fabric, shaken to its foundation +by a most unwise reactionary movement which +only precipitated its downfall, instead of averting<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">[245]</a></span> +it, as extravagantly expected by the Petrograd +Court, which betrayed Russia in favour of Germany, +and unconsciously opened the road which +led the weak and unfortunate Czar to his lamentable +fate.</p> + +<p>In my humble opinion, <span class="smcap">plebiscitary cæsarism</span> +is not compatible with a system of ministerial +responsibility for all the official acts of the +Sovereign.</p> + +<p>The frequent use of the plebiscit would certainly +tend to diminish in the mind of political +leaders the true sense of their responsibility. It +would too often offer an easy way out of an awkward +position without the consequence of having +to give up power.</p> + +<p>If I understand right the real meaning of the +two words: <i>plebiscit</i> and <i>referendum</i>, the first +would be used to try and ascertain how public +opinion stands upon any given question of public +policy, of proposed public legislation: the second +would be employed for the ratification by the electorate +of a law passed by Parliament. I have less +objection to the second system which, in reality, is +an appeal from Parliament to the Electorate. But +to the well practised, the adverse vote of a majority +of the electors should have the same result as a +vote of the majority of the House of Commons rejecting +an important public measure upon the +carrying of which the Cabinet has ventured their +existence.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">[246]</a></span></p> + +<p>Without the immediate resignation of the +ministers meeting with a reverse in a <i>referendum</i>, +I consider that ministerial responsibility would +soon become a farce destructive of constitutional +government. The defeat of a Cabinet in a <i>referendum</i> +would be equivalent to one in general elections +and should bear out the same consequence.</p> + +<p>Surely, no one having some clear notions of +what <span class="smcap">ministerial responsibility</span> means, will pretend +for a moment that a Cabinet who, on being +defeated in the House of Commons, advises the +Sovereign—or his representative in Canada—to +dissolve Parliament for an appeal to the people, +could remain in power if the Electorate approved +of the hostile stand taken by the House of +Commons.</p> + +<p>I can see no difference whatever in the +meaning of an hostile referendum vote and that +following a regular constitutional appeal from an +adverse majority of the popular House of representatives. +In both cases, the downfall of the +defeated ministers should be the result.</p> + +<p>From the above comments, I draw the sound +conclusion, I firmly believe, that any important +readjustment of the constitutional relations of the +Colonies with Great Britain, should be first ratified +by the actual Parliaments of the Dominions +and subsequently by the electors of those Dominions. +But I am also strongly of opinion that the +ratification by the electorate should be taken upon +the ministerial responsibility of the Cabinet who<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">[247]</a></span> +would have advised the Sovereign and asked +Parliament to approve the proposed readjustment. +It would be the safest way to have the Cabinet to +consider the question very seriously before running +the risk of a popular defeat which would have to +be followed by their resignation.</p> + +<p>Another most important reason to quiet the +fears of our "alarmists" at an impending wave of +flooding Imperialism, is that any radical change +in the constitutional relations of England with her +Colonies for the unity and consolidation of the +Empire, should be adopted by the Parliaments and +the Electorates of all the Colonies to be affected by +the new conditions.</p> + +<p>Consequently, from every standpoint the +Dominions and the Empire herself are guaranteed +against the dangers of rashness in changing the +present status of the great British Commonwealth.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">The Far Off Future.</span></div> + +<p>Though it may be of little use, and perhaps +perplexing, to look too far ahead to try and foresee +what the distant future has in store for the generations +to come, still a simple call to common sense +tells one that the political destinies of any Commonwealth +are, in a long course of time, largely +and necessarily shaped by the increases in population +and wealth, irrespective of the actual more +or less harmonious working of present and immediately +prospective constitutional institutions.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">[248]</a></span></p> + +<p>Broadly speaking, was it to be supposed, for +instance, that the two wide continents of America +would have, when peopled by hundreds of millions, +continued in a condition of vassalage to the European +continent, though owing their discovery and +early settlements to European genius and enterprise? +No doubt the growing national families of +the New World would have liked a much longer +stay under the roofs where they were born, had +they received better and kinder treatment from +their fatherly States. But at best the hour of +separation would only have come later, postponed +as it would have been by the bonds of enduring +affection made more lasting by mutual good relations. +Do we not see, almost daily, desolated +homes often the sad result of senseless misunderstandings, +or of guilty outbursts of intemperate +passions? Yet, family home life, even when blessed +by the inspiring smile of a lovely wife, the sweet +voice of a devoted mother, the manly and Christian +example of a good father, the affectionate sentiments +of well bred children, is far too short under +the most favourable circumstances. And why? +Because it has to follow the Divine decree ordering +separation for the building of new homes, to keep +Humanity advancing towards the final conclusion +of her earthly existence.</p> + +<p>Had the American colonies been favoured by +the constitutional liberties the Dominion of Canada +enjoys, they would not have revolted and +British connection would have endured many years<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">[249]</a></span> +longer. Still, one cannot conclude that those British +provinces, realizing the marvellous development +all can witness, would have for ever agreed +to be satisfied with their colonial status. When +they would have grown taller and bigger than the +mother-country, most likely Great Britain herself +would have taken the initiative of a friendly separation +followed by a close alliance which would have +perpetuated the familial bond actually so happily +restored.</p> + +<p>As prophesied by Sir Erskine May, more than +half a century ago, in speaking of the probable +future of the then British colonies, the American +Republic would <i>have grown out of the dependencies +of the British Empire</i>.</p> + +<p>And to-day, when the United States are doing +such a gigantic effort, conjointly with the whole +British Empire, to save Humanity from German +cruel domination, England, to use the very words +of the distinguished writer and historian just +cited, "<span class="smcap">may well be prouder of the vigorous +freedom of her prosperous son than of a hundred +provinces subject to the iron rule of +British pro-consuls</span>."</p> + +<p>The possibilities of the material development +of the Dominions of Canada, Australia, New +Zealand and South Africa—without counting +India and the lesser colonies—on account of their +immense natural resources, are such as to justify +very great hopes for their future. The time will +come when they will number together a much<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">[250]</a></span> +larger population than the United Kingdom. Will +the British Empire, as foreseen by one of the +greatest political minds Canada has produced, +declared by his chief and worthy opponent the +equal to the celebrated William Pitt, then develop +into a grand Commonwealth of nations.</p> + +<p>If so, as wrote Sir Erskine May, England +"<i>will reflect, with exultation, that her dominion +ceased, not in oppression and bloodshed but in the +expansive energies of freedom, and the hereditary +capacity of her manly offspring for the privileges +of self-government</i>."</p> + +<p>Several generations will certainly rise and +disappear before such an important question, +looming far off in the future, is likely to be—if +ever—raised requiring a practical solution. But +foreseeing such a distant possibility, it is still +more our bounden duty to be true to our present +and prospective obligations for many years to +come, as foreshadowed by the actual course of +events shaping themselves in the sense of the consolidation +of the Empire which may never be really +dissolved even by the separation of her manly +<i>offspring</i>. Family bonds, strengthened by deep +affection, are not broken because the faithful boy, +grown up a healthy and strong man, leaves to go +under his own blessed roof, taking with him to his +last day the cherished recollections of the happy +days he has passed in the equally blessed parental +home.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">[251]</a></span></p> + +<p>One of our most ardent desires must be that +our successive generations of children be so well +trained to the intelligent and patriotic use of +Political Liberty, as to accumulate, in due course +of time, an admirable heritage of sound principles +of self-government enriched by the honourable examples +of our faithful loyalty to the Mother land +never grudged to her, but given with overflowing +measure, not only as a matter of duty, but also as +a reward from grateful subjects for the regard and +respect always paid to their constitutional rights +and privileges.</p> + +<p>If such is ever the natural outcome of our +political achievements, the vast Empire reared +with such a great success would truly survive +separation, being merely transformed into a splendid +galaxy of independent States still bound +together by the strong ties created by centuries of +reciprocal devotedness. It would constitute a real +league of nations working in concert and with +grandeur for the peace and the prosperity of the +whole world.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">A Machiavellian Proposition.</span></div> + +<p>On reading Mr. Bourassa's pamphlet entitled:—<i>Yesterday, +To-day, To-morrow</i>, I discovered +what I have qualified a <i>Machiavellian proposition</i>. +What <i>Machiavellism</i> means is well known. It expresses +the views of that most corrupt and +contemptible politician and publicist, called +<span class="smcap">Machiavel</span>, born at Florence, in 1649.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">[252]</a></span></p> + +<p>At page 140 of the above mentioned pamphlet, +Mr. Bourassa wrote:—</p> + +<p>"<span class="smcap">I will speak my mind openly</span>—<i>je vous livre +toute ma pensée</i>—: <span class="smcap">if in default of Independence, +I claim Imperial representation, it is because it +would weaken the military organization of +England</span>,—<i>l'armature de guerre de l'Angleterre</i>—<span class="smcap">precipitate +the dissolution of her Empire, +hasten the day of deliverance, for us and for +the whole world.</span>"</p> + +<p>Such are the loyal sentiments expressed by +the "Nationalist" leader. He clamours for the Imperial +representation of the Colonies, for the +solemnly avowed object to use the privilege for the +destruction of the Empire. To achieve this end he +declares that the military power of England must +first be weakened.</p> + +<p>No wonder then that he started his "Nationalist" +campaign by fighting with all his might the +two successive proposals of contribution to the +great military naval fleet of Great Britain.</p> + +<p>No wonder that he opposed Canada's intervention +in favour of England in the South African +war.</p> + +<p>No wonder that from the outbreak of the +hostilities, in 1914, until the day when he was shut +up by the Order-in-Council censuring all disloyal +speaking and writing detrimental to the winning +of the war, he has tried to move heaven and earth +to prevent Canada's participation in the conflict.</p> + +<p>He tells his countrymen that if he has become<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">[253]</a></span> +a convert to Imperial representation—in other +words, Imperial Federation—it is because he considers +it would be the best way of ruining the Empire +and of delivering, not only Canada, but the +whole world from British domination.</p> + +<p>For fear that the French Canadians, whom he +especially wished to influence, would not be very +easily caught in the disloyal trap, he tries hard to +prevail upon them by the following reasons:—</p> + +<p><i>"If we are not sufficiently clear-sighted and +energetic to work for this salutary object by the +most constitutional, the most British, means at +our disposal, others, happily, will do it for us.</i></p> + +<p><i>"The English-Canadians, the Australians, the +New Zealanders persistingly claim representation +in the government of the Empire. When the war +is over, their claims will be reaffirmed with increased +ampleness and energy. The Indians (les +Hindous) themselves will do the same. Shall we +remain alone to rot stupidly (croupir béatement) +in colonial abjection."</i></p> + +<p>Without the slightest doubt, there are many +English-Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, +South Africans, Indians, in favour of Colonial Imperial +representation. The number is increasing +and likely to increase. But Mr. Bourassa is absolutely, +I might as well say, absurdly, mistaken, if +he really believes that they do so for his own purpose +of destroying the British Empire. They want +the very reverse: their object is <span class="smcap">to consolidate the +Empire</span>, not <span class="smcap">to dissolve her</span>. They will not accept<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">[254]</a></span> +as a very flattering compliment Mr. Bourassa's +charge that their desire to strengthen the British +Commonwealth proves that they prefer to continue +<i>stupidly rotting in colonial abjection</i> rather than +work for their deliverance from British domination.</p> + +<p>But what in the world has brought the "Nationalist" +leader to the conclusion that the surest +way to save Canada from the peril of Imperialism +was to secure Imperial representation for the +treasonable purpose, on entering the fort, to pull +down the flag and destroy the whole Empire? To +frighten his French Canadian compatriots with +terror at the slightest move in favour of an increased +Imperialism, he waves before them, with +wild gesticulation, any and every extravagant +writings he lays his hand on preaching a ridiculous +expansion of Imperialist aspirations. He is perhaps +the only man in Canada who has read a most +absurd work which he pretends to have been written +by a General named Lea, and from which, in +horror stricken, he summarized a few unbelievable +views.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa said that General Lea, <i>gifted +with an astonishing foresight, predicted all that +was happening in Europe and in the world. The +General</i>, again affirms Mr. Bourassa, <i>has proved +in a striking way that if England wishes to maintain +her Empire and to continue exercising her +domination over the world she must make the sacrifice +of her political liberties and of those of her +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">[255]</a></span> +Colonies, abolish the Parliamentary and Representative +Governments and resolutely adopt the +ironed regime of the Romans of old, of the Germans +of the present day</i>.</p> + +<p>Once so brilliantly inspired, General Lea +went on in a splendid manner. He added, says Mr. +Bourassa, <i>that England must transform her Empire +into a vast armed camp, must keep in her own +hands all the powers of command, must subdue +all the non-British races to the supremacy of the +Anglo-Saxons united together by the unique +thought of dominating the world by brutal force</i>.</p> + +<p>These views—so says Mr. Bourassa—are to +be found in a book entitled: "<i>The Day of the +Saxon</i>." If they have been really expressed with +the full sense given to them by Mr. Bourassa's +translation into French, I cannot say less than +that they are most absurd, most extravagant. The +Nationalist leader would have proved himself a +much more sensible, a wiser man, if, laughing at +such senseless notions, he had refrained from +quoting those lines for the purpose of telling the +French-Canadians that like all non-British races +on earth they were doomed to be devoured—flesh +and bones—by the voracious Anglo-Saxons bent on +swallowing humanity. And to save them from +such a cruel fate, he implores them to clamour for +Imperial representation with the criminal intent +of betraying their trust, and to use the honourable +privilege they would be granted to ruin the Empire +they would swear to maintain and defend.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">[256]</a></span> +So far as the political program of General Lea +is concerned, we have not yet learned that its benevolent +author was doing much in the war to carry +it out. If I had the honour to meet the General, +being presented, I presume, by Mr. Bourassa, I +would ask him, first, when and where he has discovered +that England was <i>dominating the world</i>.</p> + +<p>I know that there exists a great England +holding a large situation on earth. Her Empire +extends to almost a fourth of the globe. Her Sovereignty +reigns over nearly four hundred million +of human beings; a truly beneficient Sovereignty, +because it rules according to the wishes, to the +opinions of its subjects, managing their own affairs +in virtue of the freest political institutions in the +whole world.</p> + +<p>I know of no England dominating, or even +aspiring to dominate, the world. Such an England +only exists in the heated imagination of that General +Lea and in the minds of all those, like the +Nationalist leader, who are, or feign to be, tortured +by the bugbear of military Imperialism of +the old Roman ironed type.</p> + +<p>As long as three-fourths of the earth will remain +independent of the British Empire, under +numerous sovereignties, England's pretended domination +of the world will ever only be an extravagant +dream.</p> + +<p>Wishing England <i>to continue her domination +of the world</i>, General Lea, no doubt to please Mr. +Bourassa, was bound to suggest the means to do +so. Let us analyze them.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">[257]</a></span></p> + +<p>1.—England <i>must make the sacrifice of her +political liberties and of those of her Colonies</i>.</p> + +<p>2.—She <i>must abolish parliamentary and representative +governments</i>.</p> + +<p>It is beyond conception that Mr. Bourassa +should have for one minute seriously considered +such absurd notions.</p> + +<p>I would enjoy attending large public meetings +in Great Britain, where General Lea would propose +to British free men the sacrifice of all their +political liberties, to witness the rather warm +reception he would be favoured with. I am sure +he would have to rush out of the halls much faster +than he would have walked in.</p> + +<p>Where is the sane man who really believes +that, dreaming of a domination of the world by +<i>brute force</i>, British free men would consent to do +away with their Parliamentary system <i>to transform +the whole of the Empire into an armed camp</i>? +Such a proposition was sheer madness, a most +foolish talk, unworthy of the slightest attention +from sensible people. Mr. Bourassa was very +wrong in giving it publicity, and very unwise, to +say the least, in using it to frighten his French-Canadian +compatriots by blandishing before their +eyes that ridiculous specimen of the phantom of +Imperialism.</p> + +<p>Is it to be supposed for one single instant +that the British people, so rightly proud of their +political liberties, and of their representative +government, which after centuries of efforts and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">[258]</a></span> +trials they have successfully brought to such perfection, +basing its future permanency on the solid +rock of ministerial responsibility, would consent +to sacrifice them for the sake of a vain, a ridiculous, +an odious and impracticable scheme <i>to dominate +the world by brute force</i>?</p> + +<p>It is ten times worse than madness to believe +that the British people who have torn away from +the British soil the last root of <span class="smcap">ABSOLUTISM</span>, would, +for any earthly reason, renounce their most legitimate +conquests, to rebuild, on the burning ruins of +their most sacred rights, an ironed political +regime of the old Roman or present German type! +Is it to be believed that they would agree to replace, +on the glorious Throne which they protect +with all the might of their loyal affection, their +present constitutional Sovereign by a new Nero +or another Wilhelm II?</p> + +<p>If it is with the purpose of preventing such a +dire calamity that the Nationalist leader became +a convert to Imperial Federation, he is absolutely +losing his time and his energy in promoting such +a regime. If ever Imperial Federation becomes a +fact, we can all rest perfectly assured that the new +Imperial Parliament will not vote their own +destruction to be replaced by an autocratic and +tyrannical government.</p> + +<p>I hope that Mr. Bourassa is the only believer, +all over Canada, in the assertion of General Lea +that England's aspirations is <i>to dominate the +world by brute force</i>. It is a most injurious, I<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">[259]</a></span> +can say, calumnious, charge. All know, or should +know, that England was the first nation to completely +abolish slavery over all her Empire; that +has granted, in the largest possible measure, +Political Liberty to all her Colonies; that guarantees +to all races the same rights and privileges, +never interfering in colonial internal management. +He is wilfully guilty of a calumnious charge the +man who accuses the British race to aspire to +dominate the world by an <i>ironed regime</i>, when he +should know that Great Britain ran the risk of a +crushing defeat, in refusing to organize a standing +army of several millions of trained officers and +men.</p> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">A Treasonable Proposal.</span></div> + +<p>The Nationalist leader wants the French-Canadians +to support his scheme in order <i>to work +for the salutary object of demolishing the British +Empire by the so very constitutional means of Imperial +Federation</i>. How he has failed to realize +the infamous kind of suggestion he was making +will always be a wonder to all those reading it.</p> + +<p>If, sooner or later, Great Britain and her +Colonies are politically organized as an Imperial +Federation, the Province of Quebec will have several +French-Canadian representatives in the new +Greater Imperial Parliament. The Nationalist +leader wants those French-Canadian Members to +go to London pledged to destroy the Empire to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">[260]</a></span> +which they will have to swear allegiance and fealty +before crossing the threshold of the House of +Commons and taking their seats. Does he not understand +that any French-Canadian doing what he +wishes and recommends would deliberately perjure +himself? Does he not comprehend that he +was paying a rather poor compliment to his British +countrymen from Canada, Australia, New +Zealand and India, when he affirmed, without the +shadow of truth, that they would elect to the Imperial +Parliament members holding the mandate +from them to work for the dissolution of the +Empire?</p> + +<p>I notice, with surprise, that in the enumeration +he has drawn of the future destroyers of the +future federated British Empire, he has not convened +his friends, the Boers, to his holy task. Does +he not consider them as <i>farsighted</i> and <i>energetic</i> +as the others he has pompously mentioned with +such childish illusion. Or, has he not, unconsciously, +paid them the high compliment to suppose that +they would be unable to accomplish the treasonable +act which, with confidence, and even certainty, +he expects from the others. Our countrymen, the +Boers of South Africa, have, by a large majority, +become so loyal to the Crown, to the Empire,—and +they have so gloriously proved it since the outbreak +of the war—that it is manifestly evident +that they are very well satisfied with their present +position, that they have dispelled from their minds +all bitter recollections of the struggle which, a few<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">[261]</a></span> +years ago, finally brought them within the Empire +they are doing such a noble effort to maintain and +save from the German tyrannical grasp.</p> + +<p>The following views, recently expressed, in +London, by Mr. Burton, Minister of Railways and +Harbours in the Government of South Africa, a +leading public man of the far away sister Dominion, +is refreshing reading after Mr. Bourassa's +outrageous outburst above quoted. He said:—</p> + +<p>"<i>One of the motives which prompted South +African support of the British cause was the fact, +which appealed not only to the English-speaking +population, but moved the Dutch population—the +fact that the British cause had embraced all the +progressive peoples of the world. It was not +Britain's wealth, or influence, or power that appealed +to them; it was the priceless privilege of +the maintenance of our constitutional liberties. +He could illustrate their attitude by a single incident +which had come within his own experience +in connection with a Transvaaler, born and bred, +whom he had questioned as to his future in the +military service in which he was an officer. The +officer replied that he had been through the German +South-West African campaign, that he was +going through the German East African campaign, +and when that was done he intended making for +Flanders. He added: "I mean that as a man I +could not act otherwise in view of the treatment +dealt out to us by Great Britain. If she had not +done what she did for us I should not have stirred +hand or foot.</i>"<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">[262]</a></span>"</p> + +<p>No one need be surprised that the South +African Dominion is suffering a little from the +"Nationalist" fever, a disease infesting many +countries, in various degrees, and with time cured +by the safe remedy of the sound common sense of +the people. We know too much about it ourselves, +after nearly eighty years of free responsible government, +to wonder at the fact that a small minority +of the Dutch South Africans—from the Boer +element—is not yet fully reconciled with their lot +under the British Crown. They apparently dream +of Republicanism, in sullen recollection of a recent +past which only some of the present generation +still regret, but which the next will strive to cherish +only as the stepping stone to their actual status +so full of good promises for their future. The few +South Africans suffering from this virus are almost +exclusively recruited amongst the populations +of the late Republics of South Africa. The +people of the provinces of Natal and Cape Colony, +with a long experience of British rule, have no +faith in the "republican nationalism" desired by +some, which does not in the least appeal to their +good sense and their sound political foresight. +Mr. Burton believes "<i>that the instigators of the +movement are looking for votes more than for +anything else</i>."</p> + +<p>Mr. Burton, moreover, truly said:—</p> + +<p>"<i>It was part of the history of all countries +that what was called "Nationalism" made a powerful +appeal to the finer classes of young men. It<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">[263]</a></span> +was an admirable sentiment, but what was complained +of in South Africa was that the sentiment +was expended upon a wrong conception of "nationalism" +and what nationhood should be. In South +Africa it was restricted, it was sectional, and practically +racial. The energy and activity displayed +were being spent upon a mistaken cause.</i>"</p> + +<p>Every word of this quotation applies with +still greater force to the "nationalism" of the +Province of Quebec.</p> + +<p>Mr. Burton goes on saying:—</p> + +<p>"<i>It was the cause of South Africa first—as it +should be—but it was more than that. It was +South Africa first, last, and all the time, and South +Africa alone. He and those who were associated +with him could not accept that view. It would +mean ruinous chaos in South Africa. They had +obligations to Great Britain. It was not merely +that they had received recognition from the beginning +that their Constitutional cause was just. It +was not merely that Great Britain in its relation +with South Africa had been actuated by that +beneficent influence which the British system of +liberty effected under the sway of its flag throughout +the world, but it was that the people of the +Union realized the true inward significance of the +struggle in which the Empire was engaged. They +knew that the world's freedom was at stake, and +with it their own. The people in South Africa had +long ago awakened to this great fact, and they +were realizing it more and more as the war went<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">[264]</a></span> +on. When he had spoken of putting "South Africa +first" as the motto of a party he wished it to be understood +that he and the people of South Africa +generally accepted it, as every nation was bound to +accept it. But they also realized that their future +as a nation and their freedom as a nation were at +stake, and that their interests were bound up with +those of the British Empire.</i></p> + +<p>"<i>It was because they realized that fact that +the Government of the Union had in these troublous +times nailed its flag to the mast. It was the +honourable course, the right course, and they had +stuck to it through good report and ill report, and +through much trial and sacrifice. His last message +as representative of the Union Government +was: Upon that attitude of the Union Government +they might depend to the very last. They might be +forced—he did not see any present prospect of it—to +abandon office, but so long as they were in office +they would adhere absolutely in the letter and in +the spirit to the undertaking they had given and +would continue in the path they had followed +hitherto.</i>"</p> + +<p>Sensible, truly political and patriotic, noble +words, indeed. Are they not the complete expression +of the powerful wave of enthusiasm which +spread throughout the length and breadth of the +whole British Dominions overseas, when, after +exhausting to the last drop her efforts to maintain +peace, Great Britain, in honour bound, threw +her gallant sword in the balance in which the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">[265]</a></span> +destinies of the world were to be weighed during +the frightful years of the most terrific thundering +storm ever witnessed by man?</p> + +<p>How weighty those words are is evident. +They are still more so by the fact that they positively +and firmly express the views and sentiments +of the two most trusted and illustrious leaders of +the Boers, who, both of them, took a very prominent +part in the South African war, as generals +commanding the forces of the South African Republics: +General Botha and General Smuts.</p> + +<p>General Botha is, and has been for several +years, the Prime Minister of the South African +Dominion. General Smuts is minister of Defence +in General Botha's Cabinet. He is the representative +of the Government of the Union of South +Africa in the Imperial War Cabinet. In June, +1917, he was, moreover, "invited to attend the +meetings of the British War Cabinet during his +stay in the British Isles."</p> + +<p>Both General Botha and General Smuts have +often spoken about the present relations of their +great Dominion with England. The press of the +whole British Empire has published their speeches, +most favourably commented by that of the Allied +nations. In every case, they were brilliant with +true and staunch loyalty, worthy of the real statesmen +the speakers are, in every sense fully up to +what could be expected from the illustrious military +and political leaders of a valiant race deserving +the respect of all by her heroism of the +past and her loyalty of present days.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">[266]</a></span></p> + +<p>If ever Mr. Bourassa, as I hope he will, reads +the above quoted lines, I am sure he will find +therein every reason to be satisfied with his decision +not to call upon the South Africans to join +with him and those he has summoned, in the unworthy +task of bringing on Imperial Federation +for the very treasonable purpose of destroying +the British Empire. For once, his judgment did +not fail him.</p> + +<p>Nobody knows if representatives from the +whole present colonial Dominions and India will +ever sit, in London, as members of a new Imperial +Parliament. It is most unlikely, at all events, +that any one, merely to please Mr. Bourassa, will +help building such a political structure with the +criminal and treasonable purpose of throwing it +at once to the ground with a tremendous crash. +But we can all safely join in the affirmation that +in the event of such a great historical fact being +accomplished as that of a federated British Commonwealth, +the representatives of the Colonies +overseas will meet in the Imperial Capital to do +their duty with loyalty and honour. I have no +hesitation whatever to pledge my word that the +French Canadian representatives in London would +be amongst the most loyal to their Sovereign and +to the Empire, the most true to their oath.</p> + +<p>I solemnly protest against the injurious imputation +the Nationalist leader has addressed to +my French Canadian compatriots in charging +them with the desire <i>to rot stupidly in colonial<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">[267]</a></span> +abjection</i>. Let us repulse the unfounded accusation +from an elevated standpoint. I feel the utmost +contempt for all kinds of narrow prejudices, +of blind fanaticism. Nations, like individuals, all +pursue Providential destinies in this human world. +There is no more abjection in the colonial status +than in any other. Canada is a British colony by +the decree of Providence. Every nation—like +every individual—has duties to perform in any +situation she may occupy in the course of historical +events. Abjection is not the result of the +faithful discharge of duty, however trying the circumstances +may be. It would be in its violation +with the guilty intent to betray.</p> + +<p>A hundred times better it is to remain a colony +as long as the Supreme Ruler of the world will so +order, than to attempt to break through by the +dark plot of an infamous conspiration.</p> + +<p>Let our destinies follow their natural development, +striving to the best of our ability and patriotism +to have them to achieve the happy conditions +which we enjoy. Any man aspiring to a +legitimate influence on the mind of our compatriots, +must encourage them, by words and +deeds, to faithfully accomplish their daily task in +showing them the advantages of their position. +Inconveniences are the outgrowth of any political +standing. In the true Christian spirit, trials are +everywhere to be met with. Sacrifice, when necessary, +ennobles national as well, and as much, as +individual life.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">[268]</a></span></p> + +<p>It is very wrong on the part of any one to +trouble the mind of our compatriots in purposely +exhibiting to their view discouraging pictures of +the difficulties of their situation. Their national +existence is not, never will, never can be, exclusively +rosy. Be it as it may, who can pretend, in good +faith, that there exists, on the surface of the globe, +a population, all things considered, happier than +our own. Our race freely grows on a fertile and +blessed soil which she cultivates with her vigorous +and intelligent daily toils, which she waters from +the sweat of her brow, to which she clings by all +the affections of her heart, by the noblest aspirations +of her soul. On week days, proudly working +on her domains; on Sundays, kneeling before the +Altars of her Church, fervently thanking Him for +past graces and gifts, she prays to the Supreme +Giver of all earthly goods to continue to favour +her with peace, with order, in the legitimate enjoyment +of her liberties, together with the moral, +intellectual and material progress she is striving +to deserve.</p> + +<p>Guilty is the man who tortures them with +chimerical aspirations, who advises them to conspire +against the legitimate authority which she +must, and will, respect in spite of the seductions +attempted to have her to fail in her duty.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">[269]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXVIII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Outrages Are No Reasons.</span></h3> + + +<p>The failings of human nature, the differences +of temper, of the qualities and defects of heart and +soul, are such that harmony and good-will amongst +men in private life are too often difficult to secure. +The Divine precept, so frequently broken, should, +however, always rule the relations between man +and man. It should, with still more constant application, +rule the relations between different +races Providentially called to live together on the +same soil, under the same Sovereign authority, +enjoying the same institutions, the same liberties, +protected by the same flag. That the house divided +against itself is sure to fall is true of the nation +as well as of the home. National and family happiness +and prosperity are alike dependent on the +feelings of real brotherhood which prevail in both. +Any good hearted man appreciates how much +kindness of speech, courtesy of dealings, cordiality +of manners, contribute to reciprocal good-fellowship, +brotherly in the home, inspiring in the daily +intercourse of citizens, patriotic in the nation at +large. The more a Sovereign State is inhabited +by numerous ethnical groups, like the British Empire +and the American Republic, the more important<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">[270]</a></span> +it is that the freedom of expressing one's +opinion on all matters of public interest should +be used with fairness, with respect for those holding +different views, with due regard for the feelings +which are the natural outcome of racial developments, +of cherished recollections, of legitimate +hopes.</p> + +<p>Such are the principles, I am most happy to +say, that I have admired and try to practice in the +exercise of my rights as a citizen of the Province +where I saw the light of day, of Canada where I +have lived and hope to live all my years, of the +British Empire whose loyal subject I have been +and am determined to remain to my last moment.</p> + +<p>How then could I have helped being shocked +when I came to read the following lines I translate +as follows from page 121 of Mr. Bourassa's +pamphlet:—"<i>Yesterday, To-day, To-morrow</i>":—</p> + +<p>"<i>Were the French Canadians to persist in +their obstination to rot in colonialism and to consider +that it is for them the happiest and the most +glorious condition of existence, the English Canadians +would force them out of it. Our countrymen +of the British races have grave defects: they +are</i> <span class="smcap">IGNORANT</span>, <span class="smcap">PRETENTIOUS</span>, <span class="smcap">ARROGANT</span>, <span class="smcap">SHORT-SIGHTED</span>, +<span class="smcap">DOMINEERING</span>. <i>They are, more than ourselves</i>, +<span class="smcap">ROTTEN WITH MERCANTILISM</span>. <i>They seem to +have lost some of the best qualities of the English +people, to have developed their faults and acquire +many of the</i> <span class="smcap">vices natural to the worst category +of Yankees</span>. <i>But they have not</i>, <span class="smcap">LIKE US</span>, <i>totally</i><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">[271]</a></span> +<span class="smcap">ABDICATED</span> <i>the</i> <span class="smcap">PROUD CHARACTER</span> <i>and the</i> <span class="smcap">PRIMORDIOUS +RIGHTS</span> <i>of the British peoples. When the war +is over, they will claim, like the Australians, the +New Zealanders, and the Indians (les Hindous), +a readjustment of the powers of government</i>."</p> + +<p>Thus, in a few lines the Nationalist leader, in +appealing to his disordered imagination, has succeeded +in slapping, in one single stroke, with +dynamical outrages, the faces of the English-speaking +Canadians of the three great British +races, of our neighbours, the Yankees, and of his +own compatriots, the French-Canadians. How +could he expect that such vitriolic language would +promote, in the Dominion, that harmony of feelings +never before so essential as at the very time he +was writing that injurious paragraph of his work, +surely not intended to help winning the war so +full of the greatest consequences, for good or ill, +for the World, the British Empire, Canada, and +our own Province of Quebec.</p> + +<p>So far, Mr. Bourassa, having gone back on +the admiration he was wont to profess for England, +in his early youth, had reserved all his assaults +for the English people. But the heart of +man, once under the sway of an unlimited and +unsatisfied ambition, is bound to drop to the lowest +depths of the extremist's aberration. In the +above quotation, he fires his battery of <i>Kruppic</i> +dimensions—loaded with poisonous invectives, at +the <span class="smcap">three great British races, English, Scotch +and Irish</span>, living in Canada.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">[272]</a></span></p> + +<p>Had his charge been intended for the English +race alone, he would have been very particular in +so saying. But, let there be no mistake about it, +he deliberately wrote <i>our countrymen of the British +races</i>. Wanting, I suppose, to prove his impartiality, +he remembered that the United Kingdom +is peopled by three illustrious races represented +all over the globe by many millions of +worthy sons, everywhere to be found hard at work +for the intelligent development of the resources of +the countries they live in and are rearing their +children. More than four millions of them are +Canadians by birth or born in Great Britain. +Many more numerous they are in the United States +where they form the solid stock upon which the +future of the Republic is firmly grounded.</p> + +<p>With the same thrust, Mr. Bourassa strikes +at the Yankees who, we may hope, have not trembled +too much at the blow. He charges them with +having infested his poor <i>countrymen of the British +races</i> with <i>many of the vices natural to the worst +category of</i> "<span class="smcap">Yankeeism</span>." Kind, cordial, courteous, +indeed he was in such a mood of tender sympathies +for the Canadian British races and their +contagious cousins the Yankees of the most corrupted +class!</p> + +<p>However, the finest flower of the whole +<i>bouquet—the rose par excellence</i>—is the one he +has gallantly presented to his French-Canadian +compatriots. He tells them with the sweetest +tones of his charming voice that they are pleased<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">[273]</a></span> +and happy to rot in "<i>colonialism</i>." But, evidently +wishing to speak to them a few encouraging words, +he mildly reminds them <i>that they are less rotten +with "mercantilism" than their countrymen of the +British races</i>.</p> + +<p>A man can be suffering less than his more +sickly brother without, for all that, being in very +good health. It is a poor consolation for the +French Canadians to hear from the Nationalist +leader that they are less infested with the mercantile +virus than their brothers of the British +races.</p> + +<p>All those who have followed with some attention +Mr. Bourassa's course for the last twenty +years, know that he is an equilibrist of the first +class. Having favoured the French Canadians +with the flattering compliment as above, he turns +about and lashes them with the sweeping slap that, +contrary to the stand the Canadians of the British +races cling to with an obstination which he deigns +to approve, they, the degenerated French Canadians +whom he pities so much, "<i>have totally abdicated +their proud character</i> of old <i>and the primordial +rights of British subjects</i>."</p> + +<p>So, in Mr. Bourassa's opinion, his French +Canadian compatriots are infested to a high degree +both with the <i>colonialist</i> and <i>mercantile</i> corruptions. +Hence, his fear that they are threatened +with a premature national death if they do not at +once listen to his brotherly warnings.</p> + +<p>I have already answered the Nationalist<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">[274]</a></span> +leader's charge that the French Canadians are +stupidly rotting in "<span class="smcap">COLONIAL ABJECTION</span>." The same +reasons refute his assumption that "<span class="smcap">COLONIALISM</span>" +is an abject status for a people.</p> + +<p>A people, a race, who would enjoy living under +the German autocratic colonial rule—for which +the Nationalist leader has so little dislike—would +indeed prove some disposition to <i>rot stupidly in +abjection</i>. But the divers peoples, the different +races, who appreciate all the beneficent advantages +of the present British colonial rule, are of very +superior stock. They know, from the clearest conception, +that Monarchical democratic institutions +are as much different from Imperial autocratic +tyranny, as true broad patriotism is far above +narrow and fanatical "Nationalism."</p> + +<p>I have only to say a few words about the +"<span class="smcap">ROTTENNESS OF MERCANTILISM</span>" against which, according +to Mr. Bourassa, the French Canadian +are not sufficiently protected.</p> + +<p>Going back to my recollections of the last +sixty years, if there is a complaint which through +all my life I have heard almost daily, with deep +regret, it is that the French Canadians were not +striving with sufficient energy and perseverance +to achieve a better and larger position in the business +world. Their leaders, religious, political and +civil, to induce them to increased exertions, have +always pointed to the example given them by their +countrymen of the British races: by the clear +headed and far-seeing English business man, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">[275]</a></span> +sturdy and hard working Scotch, the enterprising +and witty Irish. Thank God, I have well enough +understood my duty to do my humble but patriotic +share to favour this progressive movement. Never, +in so wisely advising the French Canadians, any +one supposed for a minute that he was leading +them to the infested pond of <i>mercantile corruption</i>. +The change wished by all was becoming more urgent. +All were looking for the best means to +carry it out. Our leaders, having at their head, +by right and merit, our religious chiefs under the +authority of a prince of our Church, his Eminence +the Cardinal-Archbishop of Quebec, took the initiative +with an ever increasing interest in the +success they considered so important.</p> + +<p>The establishment of a permanent school of +high commercial education and of several technical +schools was most favourably approved. Political +economy is even, in a certain measure, taught +in several of our classical colleges for secondary +education. The necessity for our young men of +knowing the English language, to succeed in commercial, +industrial and financial pursuits in Canada +and in the neighbouring Republic, is more and +more generally admitted. The French Canadians, +fully enjoying the undoubted right to do so, aspire +to achieve an advantageous and honourable position +in commerce, in industry, in finance, in transportation, +in mine working. The more we realize +this goal of our legitimate ambition, the more we +are also intensifying our efforts to promote agricultural<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">[276]</a></span> +progress and the improvement of our +country roads.</p> + +<p>If, in all the branches of our national activity, +we obtain the success we hope for, one single man +alone amongst us shudders at the idea that the +French Canadians will blindly destroy their race +with a mortal dose of the cursed "<span class="smcap">MERCANTILISM</span>" +so dishonourable to the British races.</p> + +<p>And Mr. Bourassa, instead of heartily joining +with all the leaders of his race—Cardinal, Archbishops, +Bishops, priests, statesmen, political +men, judges, professional men, merchants, manufacturers, +financiers,—to favour, as much as possible, +the commercial and technical training of his +compatriots, sneers at such efforts which, in his +candid opinion, are only plunging them in the irremediable +depths of "<span class="smcap">MERCANTILE CORRUPTION</span>"!</p> + +<p>Are not such abominable teachings a curse to +all those of the race to which they are addressed +with an unsurpassed cynicism?</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">[277]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXIX.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">How Mr. Bourassa Paid His Compliments To +The Canadian Army</span>.</h3> + + +<p>With a most admirable unanimity—<i>nemine +contradicente</i>, as Parliamentary procedure says—the +Canadian Parliament decided at once, at the +very outbreak of the hostilities, to organize a great +army to go and defend the Empire of which the +Dominion is an important component part, and +Civilization in peril from the Teutonic crushing +wave of barbarism, let loose over Belgium and +France. In the most evidently constitutional +ways, the Canadian people, as a whole, as they +had the right and the bounden duty to do, approved +the decision of Parliament.</p> + +<p>When Mr. Bourassa issued the pamphlets referred +to, some four hundred thousands volunteers +had already enlisted. A large number of them—over +one hundred and sixty thousands had reached +the western front—some the eastern—where they +fought valiantly, heroically, on French soil, +against the German hordes. Thousands of them +had fallen on the field of honour, resting with imperishable +glory, for them and for us all, in that +ancestral land which we, and ever will, cherish.</p> + +<p>More than one hundred and twenty-five thousands<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">[278]</a></span> +were on British soil, being trained for the +military operations of the following spring.</p> + +<p>The rest of the army, in numerous thousands, +was still with us, getting organized for the noble +task, and waiting to cross over the Atlantic to go +on the field of battle.</p> + +<p>The Canadian army had in every way merited +the respect and the admiration of all their countrymen +who were very happy to so testify.</p> + +<p>However, in this admirable concert of praise +and grateful congratulations, a very discordant +note was one day heard resounding from the lowest +inspiration of the human heart vibrating with +feelings of shameful contempt. It is found at +page 105 of the pamphlet previously quoted, +and reads as follows in its naked outrageous +language:—</p> + +<p>"<i>In Canada, a militarism is being forged unparalleled +in any civilized country, a depraved and +undisciplined soldiery, an armed scoundrelism, +without faith nor law, as refractory to the call of +individual honour as to the authority of its parading +or patronage officers.</i>"</p> + +<p>For all the treasures of the world, I would not +agree to bear before my countrymen the responsibility +of such injurious words addressed to the +Canadian army whose valour is doing so much for +our national honour.</p> + +<p>In one single masterly stroke of his poisoned +pen the Nationalist leader decrees that the Canadian +army is far below the worst type of German<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">[279]</a></span> +and Turkish soldiery, that no other civilized country +is cursed with such a degraded, undisciplined, +dishonoured militarism.</p> + +<p>For God's sake, whence and where has such +an outrageous outburst originated? From what +dark corner has the electric current been poured +out with such infernal fury?</p> + +<p>I shall not pretend that all our volunteers, +from first to last, had reached the saintly state of +soul of their inexorable judge. As a rule poor +mortals do not jump, by a single effort, up to that +degree of Christian perfection shining with the +great virtues of humility, charity, justice—by +words and deeds. We must not suppose that many +of our heroic volunteers had deserved, like their +trusted friend and admirer, Mr. Bourassa, to be +canonized during their life time. That some of +them, whose past was perhaps not a very strong +recommendation, have enlisted with the laudable +purpose to rehabilitate themselves in their own +self-estimation and in that of their countrymen, it +is very likely. Far from blaming them for so doing, +we must congratulate them and encourage them to +persevere in the glorious task which will entitle +them to the everlasting gratitude of their country. +Such has been the case in the armies of all nations +for many centuries past.</p> + +<p>Fortunately, far better and much more authorized +judges of the devotion, courage and patriotism +of the volunteers of the great Canadian army, as +well as of the cause for the triumph of which they<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">[280]</a></span> +have offered, and in so many cases, given their +lives, were easily found. They wrote and spoke +with no uncertain voice.</p> + +<p>In a letter approving the publication of a very +interesting pamphlet, entitled:—"<i>War controversy +between Catholics</i>"—"<i>La controverse de guerre +entre Catholiques</i>,"—His Eminence Cardinal +Begin, Archbishop of Quebec, said:—</p> + +<p>"<i>Attentively read, as it deserves to be, this +work will help to understand and to love to the +limit of devotion, (jusqu'au dévouement) the +beauty and the sovereign importance of the great +cause—the protection of the world threatened by +Germanism—for which our soldiers are so valiantly +fighting together with those of England, France +and Belgium.</i></p> + +<p>"<i>I pray God to bless those brave warriors and +to grant peace to the Christian world by the reestablishment +of Justice and Right.</i>"</p> + +<p>What an encouraging contrast! On the one +hand, a publicist, with the fury of its resounding +organs, so widely used, vowing to eternal damnation, +<i>the armed scoundrelism which Canada is</i> +forging, with conditions inferior to Teutonic and +Turkish barbarism, considering that it has reached +the lowest depth of "<i>a degradation unparalleled +in any civilized country</i>."</p> + +<p>On the other, the Head of the Catholic Church +in Canada, Cardinal Begin, blessing in the name of +God Almighty <i>our brave warriors who fight so +valiantly with those of England, France and Belgium</i>,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">[281]</a></span> +because <i>they love with true devotion the +beauty and the sovereign importance of the great +cause</i> to the triumph of which they sacrifice <i>their +lives—the protection of the world threatened by +Germanism</i>.</p> + +<p>On Thursday, October 26, 1916, Archbishop +Bruchesi, of Montreal, present at a funeral service, +in Notre-Dame Church, attended by many +thousands, for the glorious victims of the sacred +duty of defending the cause of the Allies, eloquently +said in part:—</p> + +<p>"<i>They (our heroes) had voluntarily enlisted. +Two years ago, they organized their Battalion, the +glorious 22nd. They enlisted, conscious that they +were defending the most just of all causes, that of +Civilization, of Right, of Humanity. They enlisted +with the conviction that they would serve the +interests of their country, for, when oversea, they +knew that they were defending Canada. They were +young and strong; one could not see them without +admiration.</i></p> + +<p>"<i>They have made their country's name and +their own grand. They have for all times immortalized +themselves in History, and, by them, Canada +has been immortalized.</i></p> + +<p>"<i>The war is not over; it goes on horribly, +but our hearts are hopeful. It is impossible that +they should triumph the men who, during forty +years, have prepared for the greatest war and +who, during two years, have torn the world +asunder and flooded the earth with blood. Impossible<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">[282]</a></span> +that they should triumph the men who +have declared this war without a right to avenge, +without a grievance to redress, without being menaced +in any way. Impossible that they should triumph +those who have torn, like a scrap of paper, a +pact upon which the nations relied, having faith in +the pledged word. Impossible that they should +triumph those who have invaded the territory of +valiant Belgium, whose only fault was</i>: <span class="smcap">TO REMAIN +TRUE TO HER HONOUR</span>. <i>They shall not triumph +those who, on account of their military service, +have made this war a carnage and a butchery without +precedent in History. I believe in God of all +Justice. Humanity wanted a suffering which purifies, +but when mothers shall have wept long +enough, God will have His Divine word heard.</i></p> + +<p>"<i>When this great work is accomplished, and +when we shall sing the</i> <span class="smcap">Te Deum</span> <i>of thanksgiving, +we will be able to say that Canada, that all the +Provinces of Canada, that our Province of Quebec, +have deserved their share of glory</i>."</p> + +<p>On Tuesday, November 28, 1916, at a funeral +service in the Quebec Basilica, addressing the large +audience rallied to pray for the dead heroes, Reverend +Mr. Camille Roy, one of the most distinguished +professors of the Quebec Seminary, said +in part:—</p> + +<p>"<i>They went, our officers and soldiers, to serve +a great cause. Several reasons, perhaps intermingled +in their conscience, have inspired their +courageous decision....</i><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">[283]</a></span></p> + +<p>"<i>But dominating, penetrating them all, purifying +what in them was too personal and restricted, +was the thought that in doing all this they were +going to fight with heroic brothers and employ +their strength to defend what is most venerable on +earth: outraged justice.</i></p> + +<p>"<i>Perhaps they ignored historical secrets and +diplomatic complications, but they knew the war +brutally declared, the treaties torn away, Belgium +violated, and agonizing, France mutilated and invaded, +England, herself, chased over the moving +frontier of her oceans invaded; they knew the destroyed +homes, the profanated Cathedrals, the +brutally murdered old men, women and children, +and the flood of barbarians rushing in tumultuous +waves over the fields of the sweetest country. +They knew that, over there, two nations to whom +we are attached by our political, or by our national, +life, wanted the support of their sons far away, +that they had to battle for sacred interests in a war +requiring an endurance commanding an incessant +renewal of our energies; and then, without halting +to consider if they were obliged to it by laws, they +have answered the most pressing call of their +souls, and have freely made the devoted sacrifice.</i>"</p> + +<p>What other edifying contrast between the appreciation +of the part played by the Canadian +army by three intellects, one overpowered by an +inexplicable hostile passion, the two others, inspired +by the noblest sentiments, rising to the sublime +conception of the great sacrifice accepted by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">[284]</a></span> +our brave volunteers, which they express by eloquent +words who moved the hearts and brought +<i>abundant and warm tears to the eyes of those who</i> +heard or read them.</p> + +<p>Where one only sees <i>depraved</i> beings more +contemptible <i>than all those which any other +country</i> could produce or <i>forge</i>, the two others, so +much superior in every way, admire, the first, +<span class="smcap">those who went to defend the most just of all +causes, that of Civilization, of Right, of Humanity</span>; +the second, <span class="smcap">the supernatural beauty of +sacrifice that their brothers in arms have +made of their lives to the justice of God</span>.</p> + +<p>The pamphleteer cruelly attacks those who, +to-morrow, will face with unfaltering courage the +guns of the enemy to defend Civilization and +avenge the martyrs of barbarity.</p> + +<p>The sacred orator blesses the mortal remains +of our sons who have fallen on the field of honour, +on the soil of France, where our forefathers were +born and bred, with the fervent prayer of their +grateful country that knows they died heroically +<span class="smcap">"for a great cause" to defend what is most +venerable on earth: "outraged Justice."</span></p> + +<p>The following pages from a very eloquent +Pastoral Letter by Bishop Emard, of the diocese +of Valleyfield, will, I am sure, be read with most +respectful interest by all. They are as follows:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"Dear Brethren, we certainly have the right, and we even +consider that it is for us all, citizens of Canada, loyal subjects of +England, a duty to demand from God the success of the arms of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">[285]</a></span>our Mother-country and of her Allies in the present war. If we +are not called upon, as a matter of faith, to pass judgment on the +true causes of the war, and to divide the responsibilities respecting +the calamity which covers Europe with blood, we are surely allowed +to think and to say that all the circumstances actually known +sufficiently prove that right is on the side of the peoples who have +checked the invasion, and discouraged the overflowing of the +enemy from his territory, in order that the sentiment of justice +may serve to support the devotion of our soldiers, in this great +conflict, called the struggle of Civilization against barbarism.</p> + +<p>"The Church of Christ, always the same by her doctrine, has +been marvellously constituted by the Divine Wisdom, to adapt her +externally everywhere and always, to the infinitely varied circumstances +consequent on the diversity of peoples, of governments, +of social relations. She has never ceased to practice, by Her +Pastors and her faithful children, the great lesson given by Christ: +"<b>Render therefore to Cæsar the things that are Cæsar's and to God +the things that are God's</b>," and to claim with the Apostle all the +rights as well as accept all the duties of citizens and subjects."</p></div> + +<p>After recalling that from the day <i>Divine +Providence, in Her mysterious designs</i>, allowed +Canada to pass from the French to the English +Sovereignty, <i>the Church, by Her Bishops, has declared +that, henceforth, it was the duty of the +French Canadians to transfer to the British +Crown, without reserve, the cordial allegiance +which the King of France had hitherto received +from them</i>, and that since then until the present +days, the Canadian Episcopate has remained true +to his course, Bishop Emard proceeds as follows:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"We are then, very dear Brethren, in perfect communion of +sentiments, action and language, with our venerable predecessors +of the Canadian Episcopate, in asking you to-day to address to +Heaven fervent prayers for the complete and final success of England +and her Allies in the frightful war which is covering the earth +with such unheard of horrors."</p> + +<p>The Clergy, never forgetting Peter's word respecting the +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">[286]</a></span>submission all are in duty bound to practice towards Kings as +well as towards all those holding civil power, was always faithful +in obeying the Episcopal directions never ceasing to deserve the +eulogium which the Bishops expressed to the Pope in their favour.</p> + +<p>"The French-Canadian people, so taught by words and examples, +have given in all our history the admirable spectacle of a +constant fidelity which circumstances more than once rendered +highly meritorious. Such are the true religious and national traditions +of our country. They have in our own days, as in the past, +found the exact expression suggested by the situation.</p> + +<p>"On the other hand, it appears to us a well established +fact, and the most serious minds so proclaim everywhere, that the +British Empire, together with France, martyred Belgium and +their Allies are actually struggling for the defence of the peoples' +Rights and true Liberty. (Card. Begin.) Therefore, very dear +Brethren, it must be acknowledged that Canada, herself threatened +by the possibilities of a war fought with conditions heretofore +unknown, has acted both wisely and loyally in giving, in a manner +as generous as it was spontaneous, all the support in her power to +the mother-country, England.</p> + +<p>"The Catholics, and especially those of French origin, have +not remained behind in this manifestation of true patriotism. If it +was well to make a comparison between the other groups, from the +standpoint of the free and generous participation of all to the +European war, it would be necessary, in the respective figures +obtainable, to take into account several elements which are perhaps +not sufficiently considered.</p> + +<p>"But this is not the real question. It is sufficient to show +and to note for historical authenticity that, with the encouragement +and the blessings of their Pastors, and true to their constant tradition, +the Canadian Catholics, as a whole, have, in this frightful +conflict proved the perfect loyalty which is the sound expression of +true patriotism, and which is blessed by the Church and by God.</p> + +<p>"Thousands and thousands of our young men, for a large +number of them at the cost of particular and most painful sacrifices, +and in many cases, without being able to give to their race +the benefit of their chivalrous devotion, have gone, oversea, to fight +and die for the cause which was proved to them noble and urgent.</p> + +<p>"Moreover, all over the country, the courage of our soldiers +was echoed and answered by many active and important works +characterized by charitable solidarity, and this universal co-operative +and sympathetic movement must be supported by the sentiments +of faith and piety.</p> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">[287]</a></span></p> +<p>"Since we are, at all costs, engaged in a disastrous war, the +causes of which we have not to discuss and judge, but the consequences +of which will necessarily reach our country, and since our +Canadian soldiers are battling under the British flag, with the clear +conscience of an honourable duty loyally and freely accepted, it is +just, it is legitimate that our prayers do accompany them on the +very fields of battles to support their courage, and that these prayers +ascend to Heaven to implore victory for our armies."</p></div> + +<p>Evidently the venerable Bishop of Valleyfield +is far from believing, like the publicist whose +errors we must all deplore, that in organizing a +powerful army "<i>to go overseas to fight and die for +the noble and urgent cause so proved to them</i>," the +Canadian Parliament "<i>were forging for us a militarism +without parallel in any other civilized +country, a depraved and undisciplined soldiery, an +armed scoundrelism, without faith nor law</i>."</p> + +<p>The blessings of the Head of the Canadian +Church and those of the whole Episcopate have +consolated our brave volunteers for the outrages +thrust at them, and have inspired them with the +great Christian courage to forgive their author. +The only revenge they have taken against their +accuser has been to defend himself and his own +against the barbarous Germans.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">[288]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXX.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Rash Denunciation of Public Men.</span></h3> + + +<p>A long experience of public life, whether by +daily observation, begun in my early youth, when +the Union of the Provinces was finally discussed, +carried and established, or, subsequently, during +many years of active political life as a journalist +and member of the Quebec and Ottawa representative +Houses, has taught me to judge the actions of +responsible men, whether ministerialists or oppositionists, +with great fairness and respectful regard. +At all times the government of a large progressive +country peopled by several races, of +different religious creeds, is a difficult problem. +It should not be necessary to say that in days of +warlike crisis, of previously unknown proportions, +like the present one, the task becomes almost +superhuman. Anyone taking into serious consideration +the very trying ordeal through which, for +instance, the rulers of Great Britain and France +have been, and are still passing, since early in +1914, cannot help being indulgent for those who +have the weighty and often crushing burden of the +cares of State. Let so much be said without in +the least contesting the right of free men to their +own opinion about what is best to be done. But it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">[289]</a></span> +was never more opportune to remember that the +honourable privilege of constitutional criticism +must have for its only superior object the good of +the country by improved methods.</p> + +<p>We have reason to congratulate ourselves that +this sound view has widely prevailed rallying almost +as units great nations,—our own one of them—previously +much divided in political thoughts +and aspirations, for the noble and patriotic purpose +of winning a disastrous war they were forced +to wage, in spite of their most determined efforts +to prevent it.</p> + +<p>Public men, nations rulers, like all others are +human and liable to fail or to be found wanting. +Unconscious inefficiency, however desirable to remove, +cannot be fairly classed on the same footing +as guilty failures. The first may, more or less, +injure the bright prospects of a country; the second +stains her honour which an exemplary punishment +can alone redeem.</p> + +<p>But it is said with much truth that there are +always exceptions to a general rule. That of the +human heart to be fallible in public life, as well +as in other callings, has met with only one solitary +exception in Canada: the saintly Nationalist leader +who will never have his equal, "nature having +destroyed the mould when she cast him."</p> + +<p>Considering the outrageous language he +thrusted at the Canadians of the three British +races and at our heroic volunteers, it is not to be +supposed that he was so tender-hearted as to spare<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_290" id="Page_290">[290]</a></span> +the public men, not only of Canada, but of all the +Allied Nations.</p> + +<p>When he affirmed that the real and only cause +of the war had been, and was still, the voracious +greed of capitalist speculators, especially of the +two leading belligerents, Great Britain and Germany, +united together to profit to the tune of +hundreds of millions out of the production of warship +building and materials of all sorts, was he not +charging all the statesmen and leading politicians +of all the peoples at war, of having bowed either +consciously to the dictates of traitors to their countries, +or of having been stupidly blind to the guilty +manipulations of financial banditti?</p> + +<p>It would take many pages only to make a +summary of the injurious words he has addressed +to the Canadian public men of all shades of opinion—with +the only exception of the Nationalist—on +account of the support they have given, in one +way or another, to the Dominion's participation in +the war. He qualified as a <i>Revolution</i> the policy +by which we willingly decided to take part in the +wars of the Empire whenever we came to the conclusion +that England was fighting for a just cause.</p> + +<p>On the 23rd of April, 1917, he wrote as +follows:—</p> + +<p>"<i>Very often we have shown the evident revolutionary +character of the Canadian intervention in +the European conflict.</i>"</p> + +<p>After repeating his absolutely absurd pretention, +according to the sound principles of Constitutional<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_291" id="Page_291">[291]</a></span> +Law, that Canada could have intervened in +the war as a "<i>nation</i>" he found fault with all and +every one because "<i>we are fighting to defend the +Empire</i>." He went on and said with his natural +sweetness of language:—</p> + +<p>"<i>The politicians of the two parties and the +whole servile and mercenary press have applied +themselves to this revolutionary work.... +For a long time past the party leaders are the +tools of British Imperialism and of</i> <span class="smcap">British high +finance</span>."</p> + +<p>And not satisfied with having thus slashed +all the party leaders, all the chiefs of the State, +he turns round, in an access of passionate indignation, +and charges not only all the leading +social classes, but even the Bishops, the worthy +leaders of the Church, as the accomplices of the +Imperialist revolution. He thrusts the terrible +blow as follows:—</p> + +<p>"<i>But what the war has produced of entirely +new and most disconcerting, is the moral support +and complicity which the</i> "<span class="smcap">Imperialist revolution</span>" +<i>has found in all the leading social classes</i>. +<span class="smcap">Bishops</span>, <i>financiers, publicists and professionals +went into the movement with a unity, an ardour, a +zeal which reveal the effective strength of the +laborious propaganda of which Lord Grey has been +the most powerful worker prior to the war</i>."</p> + +<p>So that there should be no mistake about its +true meaning, he favoured his readers with a very +clear explanation indeed of what, in his opinion,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_292" id="Page_292">[292]</a></span> +has transformed our meritorious and loyal intervention +in the war into a guilty revolutionary +movement. He wrote as follows:—</p> + +<p>"<i>But what the Imperialists wanted, and what +they have succeeded in obtaining, was to bind +Canada to the fate of England, in the name of the +principle of Imperial solidarity and—as we shall +see in a moment—to the cause of</i> '<span class="smcap">UNIVERSAL +DEMOCRACY</span>'."</p> + +<p>Thus, in the Nationalist leader's opinion, it +is a great crime to help England and her +Allies to win a war the loss of which would most +likely have destroyed the British Empire, involving +our own ruin in the downfall of the mighty +political edifice to be replaced, in the glorious +shelter it gives to human freedom, by the triumphant +German autocratic rule and its universal +domination. It is, to say the least, an extravagant +notion to pretend that the war has afforded the +Imperialists the opportunity—eagerly seized—"<i>to +tie Canada</i>" hand and foot, "<i>to the fate of +England</i>."</p> + +<p>If I am not mistaken—and I am positively +sure I am right in so saying—Canada was bound +to the fate of England the very day when—by +Providential decree, in that instance as well as +with regard to everything earthly—she passed +under British Sovereignty. The worthy leaders of +our Church so considered—and have since unanimously +considered—at once taking the sound +Christian stand that the French Canadians were,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_293" id="Page_293">[293]</a></span> +in duty bound, to accept their new political status +in good faith, and to loyally support their new +mother country whenever circumstances would +require their devoted help, whilst revering the old +as every child must do, if he is blessed with a good +heart, when separated by unforeseen events from +the home of his happy youth.</p> + +<p>I must acknowledge that with some of our +French Canadians of the first class and standing, +the word "Democracy" savours with soreness. +Well read in all that pertains to the great epoch +of the first French tremendous Revolution, they +abhor, with much reason, the extravagant and +false principles of the <span class="smcap">BOLSHEVIKISM</span> of those days, +which culminated in the frightful period of the +"terrorism" which, for three long years and more, +kept its strong knee on France's throat, her fair +soil flooded with the innocent blood of her children. +They are apt to be laid to the confusion that democratic +government is in almost every case, if +not always, synonymous of revolutionary institutions, +in as much as it cannot, they believe and say, +be otherwise than destructive of the principle of +"Authority," certainly as essential as that of +"Liberty," both as the necessary fundamental +basis of all good governments.</p> + +<p>Knowing this, the Nationalist leader, who has +evidently abjured his liberalism of former days, +which he was wont to parade in such resounding +sentences, multiplies his efforts to capture the support +of the few members of our most venerable<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_294" id="Page_294">[294]</a></span> +Clergy whom he supposes labouring under the +aforesaid delusion. He would not lose the chance +of trading on their feelings and sincere conviction, +in boldly declaring that his good friends, the +cursed Imperialists, had managed to drag the +Dominion through the mire of the European war +by blandishing before the eyes of the Canadian +people, so enamoured of their constitutional +liberties, the supposed dangerous spectre of +"<i>universal democracy</i>."</p> + +<p>If, in reality, democratic government could +not help being either the "French revolutionary +terrorism," of 1792-95,—which even frightened +such a staunch friend of Political Liberty as Burke—or +the Russian criminal bolshevikism of our own +trying days, we would be forced, in dire sadness, +to despair of the world's future, as Humanity +would be forever doomed to ebb and flow between +the sanguinary "absolutism" either of "autocratic" +or "terrorist" tyrants.</p> + +<p>Happily, we can, in all sincerity, affirm that +such is not the case. Is it not sufficient, as a most +reassuring proof, to point at the wonderful +achievements of free institutions, first, under the +monarchical democratic system of Great Britain +and her autonomous Dominions; second, under +the republican regime of the United States.</p> + +<p>After many long years of earnest study and +serious thinking, I cannot draw the very depressing +conclusion that the two basic principles of +sound government—Authority and Liberty—cannot<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_295" id="Page_295">[295]</a></span> +be brought to work harmoniously together for +the happiness and prosperity of nations, as far as +they can be achieved in this world of sufferings and +sacrifices. Such a conclusion would also be contrary +to true Christian teachings, the Almighty +having created man a free being with a responsible +and immortal soul.</p> + +<p>Nations who, forgetful of the obligations of +moral laws, indulge in guilty abuse of their liberties, +are, sooner or later, as individuals doing +alike, sure to meet with the due Providential +punishment they have deserved. But, also like +individuals, they can redeem themselves in repenting +for their past errors, due to uncontrolled passions, +and by resolutely and "<span class="smcap">FREELY</span>" returning to +the path of their sacred duty.</p> + +<p>The Nationalist leader also deplores, as one +of their guilty achievements, the fact that the +"<i>war had ended all equivocals and consummated +the complete alliance of the two parties</i>," to +favour, as he asserts, of course, the enterprises of +the dreaded Imperialism.</p> + +<p>True to the kind appreciation he has pledged +himself to make of the inspiring dark motives +actuating the conduct of public men, he sweetly +added:—</p> + +<p>"<i>The truce arrived at in 1914 could not, it +is true, resist the thirst for power. "Blues" and +"Reds" have recommenced tearing themselves +about patronage, places, planturous contracts and +"boodle." But with regard to the substantial<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_296" id="Page_296">[296]</a></span> +question itself, and to the Imperialist revolution +brought on and sanctioned by the war, they have +remained in accord.</i>"</p> + +<p>It could not strike such a prejudiced mind as +that of the Nationalist leader, that political chieftains, +and their respective supporters, could conscientiously +unite to save their country, their +Empire and the world from an impending terrible +disaster, and yet freely and conscientiously differ +as to the best means to achieve the sacred object +to the success of which they have pledged, and they +continue to make, their best and most patriotic +efforts.</p> + +<p>The public men, and even the private citizens, +who, not believing that he speaks and writes with +Divine inspiration, dare to differ from the Nationalist +leader, cannot, in his opinion, do so unless +influenced by unworthy corrupt motives. And he +further draws the awful conclusion "<i>that it is his +duty to note the ever increasing revolutionary +character that the European war, as a whole, is +assuming on the side of the Allies</i>."</p> + +<p>To support this last and absolutely unfounded +charge, he positively asserts that the joint "<i>policy +of the statesmen, politicians and journalists, has +much less for its object to liberate oppressed nations +like Belgium, Servia</i>, <span class="smcap">Ireland</span>, <i>Poland and +Finland, from a foreign yoke, than to overthrow +in all the countries, allies or enemies, the monarchical +form of government</i>."</p> + +<p>And then follows a most virulent diatribe by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_297" id="Page_297">[297]</a></span> +which he points, in support of his wild conclusion +aforesaid, to the Russian revolution, charging "<i>the +officious and reptile press of the Allied countries +to have joined in spreading the legend that it had +been precipitated by German intrigues at the +Court of the Czar, and to have accused the ill-fated +Emperor to have been the spy and the accomplice +of the enemies of his country</i>."</p> + +<p>At this hour of the day, in the turmoil of +flashing events perhaps never before equalled in +suddenness, pregnant with such alarming, or comforting, +prospective consequences, it is much too +early to attempt passing a reliable judgment on the +true causes which produced the Moscovite revolution +so soon and so dastardly developed into criminal +"bolshevikism." The question must be left +for History to settle when peace is restored and +the sources of truth are wide opened to the impartial +investigations of high class historians.</p> + +<p>However, enough is known to prove that Mr. +Bourassa's charge is altogether unfounded. Anyone +conversant with Russian history for the two +last centuries, is aware that German influences +and intrigues have always played a great part in +the Capital of that fallen Empire. From the very +beginning of the war, it became evident that they +were actively at work at the Petrograd Court, +thwarting the Emperor's efforts and those of his +advisers, military and civil, he could trust, to be +true to the cause he had sworn to defend with +France and England.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_298" id="Page_298">[298]</a></span></p> + +<p>The Nationalist leader, I hope, is the only man +still to wonder at this, after all that has been discovered +proving what Germany has tried to bribe +the political leaders and the press of the Allies, +with too much success in France, England and the +United States.</p> + +<p>Russia has been for too many years the favourite +soil where Germany was sowing her corrupt +intrigues, to let any sensible man suppose that she +would kindly withdraw from the preferred field +of her infamous operations, at the very time she +was exerting herself with such energy, and at the +cost of so many millions, to extend her vast spy +system almost all over the earth,—Canada included—debauching +consciences right and left.</p> + +<p>Is it unfair to say, for instance, after the +event as it developed, that Roumania was prematurely +brought into the war in consequence of +the dark German machinations at Petrograd, with +the evident understanding that the military operations, +both on the Teutonic and Moscovite sides, +were to be so conducted as to rush poor Roumania +into a most disastrous defeat, in order to feed the +Central Empires with the products of the fertile +Roumanian soil?</p> + +<p>No representative man of any consequence has +pretended that the unfortunate Czar was himself +a party to that treason of the Allied cause. He +has likely been the victim of his own weakness in +not using what was left to him of his personal +autocratic power to silence the sympathies of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_299" id="Page_299">[299]</a></span> +friends of Germany at his Imperial Court, and +even in his most intimate circle, rather than exhausting +it in a supreme, but doomed, attempt at +checking the rising tide of popular aspirations +sure, as always, to overflow to frightful excesses, +if unwisely compressed.</p> + +<p>Almost daily witnessing the successive miscarriages +of so many of the Russian military operations, +too often by the failure of the ammunitions, +supplied to such a large extent by the Allies, to +reach the Russian soldiers, or by other inexplicable +causes, it is not surprising that the people at +large became suspicious of their government which +they soon believed to be under German tutorage.</p> + +<p>The rapid, almost sudden, overthrow of the +Russian autocratic Empire can be accepted as evidence +that the movement in favour of a change +which would more efficiently conduct Russia's +share of the conflict, was widespread. The goal it +aimed at, once reached, and Russia proclaimed a +Republic, with a regular <i>de facto</i> government under +the leadership of abler men, whose patriotism +was proved by their words, but more surely by +their deeds, France, England, Italy and the United +States cannot be reasonably reproached with having +unduly opened diplomatic relations with the +new Moscovite authorities.</p> + +<p>Unfortunately, once successful in her intrigues +at the Petrograd Court, soon to fall under +the weight of popular exasperation, Germany tried +her hand in a triumphant, but shameful, way with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_300" id="Page_300">[300]</a></span> +the fiery sanguinary and treasonable element always +to be found operating in the darkest corners +for their own criminal purposes. The calamitous +outcome has been "bolchevikism" betraying their +country in the light of day, without blushing, +without hiding their faces in eternal shame, and +signing, with their hands stained with the blood of +their own kin, the infamous treaty of Brest-Litovsk +dismembering poor Russia, scattering to +the winds her fond hopes of a grand future at the +very dawn of the better days promised by a free +constitution, and plunging her in the throes of +German autocratic domination.</p> + +<p>With regard to the Nationalist leader's +rash denunciation of public men, I have only a +few more words to say. My personal recollections +going back to the early sixties of the last century, +for several years free from all party affiliations, +unbiassed by any sympathies or prejudices, I consider +it my duty to say that, on the whole, Canadian +public life, as well as British public life, is +honourable and entitled to the respect of public +opinion. Out of hundreds and thousands of politicians, +both in the Motherland and in our own +Dominion, there may have been failings. It would +be useless, even pernicious, to point at them. The +revulsion of public feeling towards the fallen for +cause, and the severe judgment of misdeeds by the +impartial historian, has been the deserved punishment +of the few who have prevaricated. I prefer +by far to take my lofty inspiration from the galaxy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_301" id="Page_301">[301]</a></span> +of faithful public servants who, from all parties, +and from various standpoints, have given the +fruits of their intelligence, of their learning, of +their hard work—and in many cases—of their +private wealth, for the good of their country. In +the course of the last fifty-five years, I have known +hundreds of our public men who lived through, +and came out of, a long political life getting poorer +every day without being disheartened and retiring +from the public service to which they were devoted +to the last. Need I point, as examples, to the cases +of several men who, departed for a better world, +Parliament, irrespective of all party considerations, +united to a man to vote a yearly allowance +of a few hundred dollars to save their surviving +widows and children from actual want and +destitution!</p> + +<p>Just as well as the Canadians of the three +British races, and the gallant volunteers of our +heroic army, Canadian and British public men +can rest assured that from the high position they +occupy in the world's estimation, they are far +above the fanatical aspersions of the Nationalist +leader blinded by the wild suggestions of an inexhaustible +thirst of rash condemnation.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_302" id="Page_302">[302]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXXI.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Mr. Bourassa's Dangerous Pacifism.</span></h3> + + +<p>Two historical truths, undeniable, bright as +the shining light of the finest summer day, which +have triumphantly challenged the innumerable +falsehoods to the contrary constantly circulated by +Germany, even prior to the outbreak of the +hostilities, are:—</p> + +<p>First, that all the countries united under the +title—the Allies, have been energetically in favour +of <span class="smcap">MAINTAINING THE PEACE OF THE WORLD</span>, when it +became evident, for all sensible people, that Germany +was eagerly watching her opportunity to +strike the blow she had prepared for the previous +forty years on such a gigantic scale.</p> + +<p>Second, that, once engaged in the conflict +against their deliberate will, and in spite of their +noble efforts to prevent the war which they clearly +foresaw would be most calamitous, they have always +remained the staunch supporters of the +<span class="smcap">RESTORATION OF PEACE</span> upon the two <i>sine qua non</i> +conditions of <span class="smcap">Justice</span> and <span class="smcap">DURABILITY</span>.</p> + +<p>To achieve these two objectives, they have +been fighting for now more than four years, at +tremendous cost of men and treasures, and they +are determined to fight until victorious.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_303" id="Page_303">[303]</a></span></p> + +<p>They would all lay down their arms to-morrow, +if the results so important for the future +of Humanity could be secured with certainty.</p> + +<p>Like all great causes, <span class="smcap">Peace with Justice and +Durability</span> has had its <span class="smcap">TRUE</span> and its <span class="smcap">FALSE</span> friends.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">TRUE</span> friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> were those who +realized from the very beginning of the frightful +struggle that it was perfectly useless to expect it, +if the disastrous Prussian Militarism was to be +maintained and allowed to continue threatening +Civilization.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">TRUE</span> friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> were those who +pledged their honour not to sheathe the sword +they had been forced to draw before Germany +would acknowledge that she had no right to violate +solemn treaties, and would agree to redeem +the crime she had committed in invading the neutral +territory of Belgium which she trampled +under her ironed heels and crucified.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">TRUE</span> friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> were those who +determined to bring Germany to renounce the +abominable principles she has professed, training +the mind of her peoples to believe and proclaim +that <span class="smcap">Might</span> is <span class="smcap">Right</span> and the only sound basis of +<span class="smcap">International Law</span>.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">TRUE</span> friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> were those who, +however anxious they were to have it restored as +soon as possible—fervently praying the Almighty +to that purpose—, knowing what are the principles +of International Law recognized by all truly civilized +nations, could not forgive Germany, <span class="smcap">UNLESS<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_304" id="Page_304">[304]</a></span></span> +<span class="smcap">SHE SINCERELY REPENTED</span>, the barbarism she displayed +in her murderous submarine campaign, and +practised in Belgium, Northern France and in +every piece of belligerent territory her armies +occupied.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">TRUE</span> friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> were those who +clearly understood that to meet the two essential +conditions of <span class="smcap">Justice</span> and <span class="smcap">Durability</span>, it was +<span class="smcap">PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE</span> to secure it by a compromise +which could not, by any means, protect +the world against further German attempts at +universal military domination.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">FALSE</span> friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> were those who +said and wrote, in sheer defiance of truth, that the +Allies, more especially England and Russia, were +as much responsible for the war as Germany +herself.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">FALSE</span> friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> were those who +falsely alleged that the Allies were preventing it +by their repeated declarations that their principal +war aim was to destroy, not only the German Empire, +but also the German race, thus wilfully and +maliciously pretending that to battle for the abolition +of Teutonic militarism, weighing so heavily +on all the nations, was equal, in guilty knowledge, +to fighting for an enemy's race destruction.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">FALSE</span> friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> were those who +were ready to sanction, at any time, a compromise +between <span class="smcap">HEROIC</span> and criminal war aims, which +would leave future generations to the tender mercies +of a Sovereign Power straining every nerve to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_305" id="Page_305">[305]</a></span> +dominate the world by the foulest means ever +devised.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">FALSE</span> friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> were those whose +daily effort was to dishearten their countrymen +from the noble and patriotic task they had bravely +undertaken with the strong will to accomplish it +at all costs, knowing, as they did, that it was a +question of life or death for human Civilization.</p> + +<p>"Defeatists," as they are called, to mean the +shameless supporters of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> negotiations to be +opened by the Allies acknowledging their defeat +and the victory of Germany, there were, and there +are, in all the "Allied" belligerent nations. No +one need be too much surprised at the hideous fact. +In all countries, at all times, under the direst circumstances, +when it is most important, in very +distressing hours, that all be of one mind, of one +heart, to save the nation's existence, are to be +found heartless, low minded, cowardly beings, +ready to betray their countrymen rather than +stand the strain of their due share of sacrifices, or, +which is still far worse, for corrupt motives, to +deliver them over to the enemy.</p> + +<p>"Defeatists" we have had, we have yet, in +Canada, in the Province of Quebec. Most happily, +they are few and far between.</p> + +<p>Imbued with the false notions he has so tenaciously +ventilated respecting Canada's participation +in the war, it is no wonder that the Nationalist +leader was sure to be found at the head of the +small group of <span class="smcap">pacifists</span>, at almost any cost, mustered<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_306" id="Page_306">[306]</a></span> +amongst the French Canadians. A sower of +prejudices, he was bound to watch with eagerness +the growing crop of ill-feelings he was fostering.</p> + +<p>Those of us who oppose all, and any, participation +by the Dominion in the wars of the Empire, +be they even so just, so honourable, so necessary, +under Mr. Bourassa's deplorable leadership, were +naturally supporters of any kind of "<span class="smcap">PACIFISM</span>."</p> + +<p>I will not classify the Nationalist leader and +his dupes as "<i>defeatists</i>," who were ready to accept +peace as the consequence of defeat. The real +"<i>pacifists</i>," so far as it is possible to ascertain +their views, unable, consciously or not, to see any +difference in the respective responsibilities of the +belligerents in opening the war, consider that they +are equally guilty in not closing it.</p> + +<p>Most happily, such a disordered opinion is +shared only by a small minority. It can be positively +affirmed that public opinion, the world over, +outside the Central Empires and their swayed +allies, is almost unanimous that Germany, +through her military party and the junkers element, +is responsible for the dire calamity she has +brought on Humanity. The question of the restoration +of "<span class="smcap">Peace</span>" must be viewed from this starting +point—the only true one.</p> + +<p>The standpoints of the <span class="smcap">TRUE</span> and the <span class="smcap">FALSE</span> +friends of <span class="smcap">Peace</span> being so far apart, the conclusions +they draw are naturally widely different.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_307" id="Page_307">[307]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXXII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">A Most Reprehensible Abuse of Sacred Appeals +To The Belligerent Nations.</span></h3> + + +<p>I cannot qualify in milder words the use Mr. +Bourassa has made of the solemn appeals His +Holiness the Pope of Rome has, at different dates, +addressed to the belligerent nations in favour of +the restoration of peace. I bear to the Head of +the Church I am so happy to belong such a profound +respect and devotion that I will scrupulously +abstain from any comment of the Sovereign +Pontiff's writings and addresses. I have read +them several times over with the greatest attention +and veneration, so sure I was that, emanating +from the highest spiritual Authority in the world, +they were exclusively inspired by the ardent desire +to promote a recurrence to good-will amongst men, +in obedience to the Divine precept.</p> + +<p>Having to reproach the Nationalist leader +with having abused of the weighty words of His +Holiness, to support his own misconceptions of +duty as a loyal British subject and a Christian +publicist, I will refrain with great care from writing +a sentence which might be construed as the +shadow of an attempt to do the same.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_308" id="Page_308">[308]</a></span></p> + +<p>I will take from Mr. Bourassa's own comments +of the Sovereign Pontiff's appeals, the two +conclusions upon which he lays great stress, and +which clearly summarize the convictions of His +Holiness Pope Benedict XV.</p> + +<p>Praying with all the powers of His heart and +soul for the orderly future of the world, the +Sovereign Pontiff implored, in the most touching +terms, the belligerent nations to agree to a "<span class="smcap">Just +and Durable Peace</span>."</p> + +<p>As it was certain, even if He had not said so +with such pathetic expressions, His Holiness drew +the saddest possible picture of the untold misfortunes +war, carried on in such vast proportions, +was inflicting upon the peoples waging the +struggle.</p> + +<p>I will only quote the few following words from +the first letter of His Holiness, dated July 28, +1915:—</p> + +<p>"<i>It cannot be said that the immense conflict +cannot be terminated without armed violence.</i>"</p> + +<p>No one can take exception to this truism, +authoritatively expressed under circumstances +greatly adding to its importance and to its solemn +announcement. It is just as true to-day as it was,—and +has been ever since,—when the whole world +was passing through the crucial ordeal of the days +during which England and France were almost imploring +Germany not to plunge the earth into the +horrors of the war she was determined to bring on.</p> + +<p>The questions at stake could then have been<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_309" id="Page_309">[309]</a></span> +easily settled without "<span class="smcap">ARMED VIOLENCE</span>," if the +Imperial Government of Berlin had listened to the +pressing demand of Great Britain in favour of the +maintenance of peace.</p> + +<p>It is scarcely believable that the Nationalist +leader has abused of those weighty words to the +point of attempting to persuade the French-Canadians +that the Allies, even more than the +Rulers of the Central Empires, have refused to +listen to the prayers of the Pope. In January last, +he published a new pamphlet, entitled "<span class="smcap">The Pope, +Arbiter of Peace</span>," in which he reproduced from +"Le Devoir" his numerous articles, from August +1914, on the intervention of the Sovereign Pontiff +in favour of the cessation of the hostilities, and on +the current events of the times.</p> + +<p>The oft-repeated diatribes of Mr. Bourassa +against England were bound to be once more edited +in the above pamphlet. Their author, in a true +fatherly way, not willing to allow them to die +under the contempt they deserve, would not lose +the chance to have them to survive in tackling them +with his comments on His Holiness' letters.</p> + +<p>This pamphlet, the worthy sequel of its predecessors +which, for the good of Mr. Bourassa's +compatriots, should never have seen the light of +day, would call for many more refutable quotations +than I can undertake to make in this work. +A few will suffice to show the deplorable purport +of the whole book.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_310" id="Page_310">[310]</a></span></p> + +<p>In his letter dated, July 28, 1915, the Pope +wrote:—</p> + +<p>"<i>In presence of Divine Providence, we conjure +the belligerent nations, to henceforth put an end to +the horrible carnage which, for a year, dishonours +Europe.</i>"</p> + +<p>Positively informed about the horrible crimes +committed by command of the German military +authorities in Belgium, and Northern France, and +by the ferocious Turks in Armenia, well might His +Holiness say that Europe was being dishonoured +by such barbarous deeds. If the military operations +had been conducted by the nations of the Alliance +in conformity with the principles of International +Law, most likely the Pope would not have used the +same language. For, however much to be regretted +are the sufferings inseparable from a military conflict +carried on with the utmost regards for the +fair claims of human feelings and justice, it could +not have been pretended that such a war was a +dishonour for the belligerents on both sides, especially +when fighting with an equally sincere conviction +that they are defending a just cause.</p> + +<p>Referring to recent history, none asserted, for +instance, that the Russo-Japanese war was a dishonour +to Europe and Asia. It was fought out +honourably on both sides. Peace was restored +without leaving bitter and burning recollections in +the minds of either peoples. And when Germany +dishonoured herself and stained Humanity with +blushing shame, both Russia and Japan joined +together to avenge Civilization.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_311" id="Page_311">[311]</a></span></p> + +<p>Let us now see how Mr. Bourassa distorted +the words of the Pope so as to use them for his own +purpose of misrepresenting the true stand of the +Allies, and more especially of England.</p> + +<p>The first sentence of his article dated, August +3, 1915, to be found at page 11 of the pamphlet, +under the title: "<i>The Pope's Appeal</i>," reads +thus:—</p> + +<p>"<i>The anniversary of the hurling of the sanguinary +fury which makes of Europe the shame of +Humanity has inspired the Rulers of peoples with +resounding words.</i>"</p> + +<p>And after eulogizing the Pope's intervention, +he adds:—"<i>that men will not hear his voice, drunk +as they are with pride, revenge and blood</i>."</p> + +<p>This may be cunningly worded, but it should +deceive nobody.</p> + +<p>One cannot help being indignant at the contemptible +attempt to place the Allies on the same +footing as the Central Empires with regard to the +responsibility <i>in hurling the sanguinary fury in +1914</i>.</p> + +<p>The plain, incontrovertible, truth is that the +outbreak of the war was a shame, not for Humanity, +the victim of Teutonic treachery, but for Germany +herself; whilst the sacred union of Belgium, +France, England and their allies to resist the +barbarous onslaught hurled at them all, was an +honour for Civilization and the promise of an +heroic redemption.</p> + +<p>At page 12 of the pamphlet, he closes the first<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_312" id="Page_312">[312]</a></span> +paragraph with the following words:—"<i>since the +fatal days when peoples supposed to be Christian +hurled themselves at one another in a foolish rage +of destruction, of revenge and hatred</i>." In French, +it reads thus:—"<i>depuis le jour fatal ou les peuples +soi-disant chrétiens se sont rués les uns contre +les autres, dans une rage folle de destruction, de +vengeance et de haine</i>."</p> + +<p>Read as a whole, with the full meaning they +were intended to convey, those words constitute a +daring falsehood. Historical events of the highest +importance cannot be construed at will. There are +facts so positively true, and known to be such, that +they should preclude any possibility of deceit.</p> + +<p>It is absolutely false that, <i>on a fatal day</i> of +mid-summer, 1914, <i>peoples hurled themselves at +one another</i>. What really took place, in the glaring +light of day, was that Germany, fully prepared +for the fray, <i>hurled</i> herself at weak Belgium, +throwing to the waste basket the scraps of the +solemn treaties by which she was in honour bound +to respect Belgian neutrality. She had first opened +the disastrous game by <i>hurling</i> her vassal, Austria, +at weak Servia.</p> + +<p>Rushing her innumerable victorious armies +over Belgian trodden soil, she <i>hurled</i> herself at +France with the ultimate design to <i>hurl</i> herself +at England.</p> + +<p>That in so doing, Germany was <i>raging</i> with +a <i>foolish</i> thirst of <i>destruction, of revenge and +hatred</i>, is certainly true. But Mr. Bourassa's guilt<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_313" id="Page_313">[313]</a></span> +is in his assertion that the victims of Germany's +<i>sanguinary fury</i> were actuated by the same criminal +motives in heroically defending their homes, +their wives, their children, their all, against the +barbarians once more bursting out of Central +Europe, this time bent on overthrowing human +freedom.</p> + +<p>Is the respectable citizen who bravely defends +himself against the ruffian who <i>hurls</i> himself at +his throat, to be compared with his murderous +assailant?</p> + +<p>But England was not alone in <i>hurling</i> herself +at Germany, as Mr. Bourassa so cordially says. +Without a word, even a sign, by the only momentum +of her <i>furious outburst of foolish destruction</i>, +she was followed by the whole of her Empire. How +much we, Canadians, were, for instance, deluded, +the Nationalist leader is kind enough to tell us in +his ever sweet language.</p> + +<p>When the Parliament of Ottawa unanimously +decided that it was the duty of the British +Dominion of Canada to participate in the war; +when Canadian public opinion throughout the +length and breadth of the land, almost unanimously +approved of this loyal and patriotic decision, +we, poor unfortunate Canadians, thought that we +were heartily and nobly joining with the mother-country +to avenge "<span class="smcap">outraged Justice</span>," to rush to +the rescue of violated Belgium, of France, once +more threatened with agony under the brutal +Teutonic ironed heels, of the whole world—Mr.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_314" id="Page_314">[314]</a></span> +Bourassa's commanding personality included—menaced +with the <span class="smcap">HUNS' DOMINATION</span>.</p> + +<p>How sadly mistaken we were, Mr. Bourassa +tells us. According to this infallible judge of the +righteousness or criminality of historical events, +we were labouring under a paroxysm of passion—<i>of +a rage of foolish destruction, of vengeance and +hatred</i>.</p> + +<p>Once overpowered by this vituperative mood +of calumnious accusations, the Nationalist leader +slashes England, as follows,—page 18—:—</p> + +<p>"<i>England has violently destroyed more national +rights than all the other European countries +united together. By force or deceit, she has swallowed +up a fourth of the earthly globe; by conquest, +and more especially by corruption and the purchase +of consciences, she has subjugated more +peoples than there were, in the whole human +history, ever brought under the same sceptre.</i>"</p> + +<p>Thus, in Mr. Bourassa's impartial estimation, +the depredations and slaughters of the hordes commanded +by Attila, the savagery of the Turks of old +and present days, the crimes of Germany in this +great war, are only insignificant trifles compared +with the horrors of British history. Shame on +such outrageous misrepresentation of historical +truth.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa accuses England to have <i>by +force or deceit swallowed up a fourth of the earthly +globe</i>. Considering the happy and flourishing +condition of the vast British Empire, the Nationalist<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_315" id="Page_315">[315]</a></span> +leader, as every one else, must admit that +England is endowed with great digestive powers, +as she does not show the least sign that she suffers +from national dyspepsia from having swallowed +up a fourth of the universe. Her national digestion +is evidently sound and healthy, for instead of +weakening and decaying, she grows every day in +strength, in stature, in freedom, in prestige, and, +above all, in <span class="smcap">WISDOM</span>.</p> + +<p>The Nationalist leader has thought proper to +express his formal hatred of militarism. One +would naturally suppose that, in so doing, he +should have pointed at the worst kind of militarism +ever devised—the German type of our own +days. Let no one be mistaken about it. At page +58 of his pamphlet, Mr. Bourassa bursts out as +follows in the top paragraph:—</p> + +<p>"<i>As a matter of fact, of all kinds of militarism, +of all the instruments of brutal domination, the +naval supremacy of England is the most redoubtable, +the most execrable for the whole world; for it +rules over all the continents, hindering the free +relations of all the peoples.</i>"</p> + +<p>Was I really deluded when I felt sure that in +peaceful times, British naval supremacy on the +seas was not interfering in the least with the +freest commercial intercourse of all the nations, +whose mercantile ships can, by British laws, enter +freely into all the ports of Great Britain? Mr. +Bourassa's assertion to the contrary, I shall not, +by the least shadow, alter my opinion which is +positively sound.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_316" id="Page_316">[316]</a></span></p> + +<p>From the above last quotation, I have the +right to infer that Mr. Bourassa is very sorry that, +in war times like those we have seen since July +1914, British naval supremacy is sufficiently paramount +to protect the United Kingdom from starvation, +to keep the coasts of France opened to the +mercantile ships of the Allies and of all the neutral +nations, to "rule the waves" against both the +German military and mercantile fleets, chased +away from the oceans by the British guns thundering +at the Teutonic pirates on land and sea. If he +is, he can be sure that he is alone to cry and weep +at a fact which rejoices all the true and loyal +friends of freedom and justice.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa cherishes a wish that will +certainly not be granted. He will not be happy +unless England agrees to give up her naval supremacy +to please Germany. Let him rest quietly on +his two ears; the dawn of such a calamitous day is +yet very far distant.</p> + +<p>At the end of page 12, Mr. Bourassa asserts +that <i>the Germans proclaim their</i> <span class="smcap">RIGHT</span> <i>to "Germanize" +Europe and the world, and that the +English imperiously affirm their</i> <span class="smcap">RIGHT</span> <i>to maintain +their Imperial power over the seas and to oppose +"Anglo-Saxonism" to "pan-Germanism."</i>—</p> + +<p>I have already refuted the Nationalist leader's +pretention, and informed him that England, no +more than any other country, has no "Sovereign +rights" on the seas outside the coastal limits as +prescribed by International Law. He appears<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_317" id="Page_317">[317]</a></span> +totally unable to understand the simple truth that +Great Britain's sea supremacy is nothing more nor +less than the superiority of her naval strength +created, at an immense cost, out of sheer necessity, +to protect the United Kingdom from the domination +of a great continental power.</p> + +<p>Does he not know that, in the days prior to +England's creation of her mighty fleet, she has +been easily conquered by invaders? Is he aware +of the great British historical fact called the +Norman Conquest? Has he never heard that before +starting on his triumphant march across +Europe, culminating at Austerlitz, the great +Napoleon had planned an invasion of England, +with every prospects of success, if he had not been +deterred from carrying it out by the continental +coalition which, calling into play the resources of +his mighty genius, he so victoriously crushed and +dispersed? Has he never read anything about +panic stricken England until she was relieved from +the dangers of the projected invasion?</p> + +<p>Does he not realize that, unless they were +madmen, no British ministers will ever consent to +renounce their "<span class="smcap">UNDOUBTED RIGHT</span>" to be ever ready +for any emergency, to save their country from enslavement +by would-be dashing invaders? It is the +height of political nonsense to suppose that responsible +public men ever could be so blind, or so recreant +to their most sacred duty, as to follow the +wild course recommended by extravagantly prejudiced +"Nationalists."<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_318" id="Page_318">[318]</a></span></p> + +<p>The man who would throw away his weapons +of defense would have nothing else to do but to +kneel down and implore the tender mercy of his +criminal aggressor. Truly loyal subjects of the +Empire cannot clamour to bring England down to +such an humiliating position. They know too well +that if ever matters came to so disastrous a pass, +Great Britain could easily be starved into irremediable +submission with the consequent and immediate +destruction of the whole fabric of the +Empire. A Nationalist, yawning for such an end, +may suggest the best way to reach it. But no +loyal man, sincerely wishing the maintenance of +the great British Commonwealth, will ever do so.</p> + +<p>No wonder that he who came out openly in +favour of Imperial Federation for the express +purpose of ruining the Empire, endeavours to +achieve his most cherished object in first destroying +British naval supremacy on the seas. Imperial +Federation would then no longer be necessary for +the consummation of his longing wishes.</p> + +<p>Freedom of the seas and British naval supremacy +are not antagonistic by any means, as I have +previously well explained. It is an unanswerable +proposition—a truism—to say that supremacy on +the ocean will always exist, held by one nation or +another. The Power commanding the superior +naval fleet will for ever be supreme on the seas. It +is mere common sense to say so. Mr. Bourassa +would vainly work his wind-mill for centuries without +changing this eternal rule of sound sense.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_319" id="Page_319">[319]</a></span></p> + +<p>If, by whichever cause, England was to lose +her sea supremacy, it would at once, as a matter +of course, pass on to the next superior naval Power.</p> + +<p>In a subsequent chapter on the after-the-war +military problem, I shall explain the way or ways, +by which, in my opinion, the question of the freedom +of the seas, so much misunderstood, could be +settled to the satisfaction of all concerned.</p> + +<p>With regard to the supposed conflict of "anglo-saxonism" +and "pan-germanism" I will merely say +that it is only another sample of Mr. Bourassa's +wily dreams.</p> + +<p>As I have already said, this last pamphlet of +the Nationalist leader is, for a large part of it, but +the repetition of his diatribes so often <i>hurled</i> at +England. I will close this chapter by quoting +from page 57, the following paragraph which summarizes, +in a striking way, the charges Mr. +Bourassa is so fond to <i>hurl</i> at the mother-country. +It reads thus:—</p> + +<p>"<i>What has allowed England to bring Portugal +into vassalage? to dominate Spain and keep Gibraltar, +Spanish land? to deprive Greece of the +Ionians and Cyprus Islands? to steal Malta? to +foment Revolution in the Kingdom of Naples and +the Papal States? to run, during thirty years, the +foreign policy of Italy and to throw her in Austria's +execrated arms? to take possession of Suez +and to make her own thing of it? to chase France +from the Upper Nile, and subsequently from the +whole of Egypt, to intervene in the Berlin treaty to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_320" id="Page_320">[320]</a></span> +deprive Russia of the profits of her victory, to galvanize +dying Turkey, to delay for thirty years the +revival of the Balkan States and to make of Germany +the main spring of continental Europe? In +a word, what has permitted England to rule the +roost in Europe and to accumulate the frightful +storm let loose in 1914? Who? What? if it is not +the "naval domination" of England ever since the +destruction of the French and Spanish fleets at +Trafalgar.</i>"</p> + +<p>It would be most difficult to condense more +erroneous historical appreciations and political +absurdities in so few lines.</p> + +<p>Many will be quite surprised to learn, from +Mr. Bourassa's resounding trumpet, that England +had been for many years gathering the storm +which broke out in 1914. So far all fairminded +men were convinced that this rascally work had +been done by Germany, in spite of England's exhortations +to reduce military armaments.</p> + +<p>In all sincerity, I am unable to understand +how Mr. Bourassa can expect to successfully give +the lie to such incontrovertible truths as the guilt +of Germany in preparing the war she finally +brought on more than four years ago, and as the +unceasing determination of England to maintain +peace.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_321" id="Page_321">[321]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXXIII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">A Case For True Statesmanship.</span></h3> + + +<p>Whatever the <span class="smcap">TRUE</span> and the <span class="smcap">FALSE</span> friends of +<span class="smcap">Peace</span> may hope and say, it is perfectly useless to +close our eyes to the glaring fact that its restoration +can only be the result of military effort combined +with the highest practical statesmanship. +After all what has happened, and the oft-repeated +declaration of the Rulers of the belligerent +nations, it would be a complete loss of a very valuable +time to indulge any longer in the expression +of views all acknowledge in principle, but which +no one, however well disposed he may be, is actually +able to traduce in practical form.</p> + +<p>When writing my French book, in the fall of +1916, reviewing the situation as it had so far +developed, I said:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"All are most anxious for peace. However it is infinitely +better to look at matters such as they are. It is evident that the +military situation does not offer the least hope that the war can +be immediately brought to an end. Successes have been achieved +on both sides. But nothing decisive has yet happened. The armies +are facing one another in defiant attitude. The belligerent nations, +on both sides, have yet, and for a long time, great resources in +man-power and money."</p> + +<p>"If Germany, which should first give up the fight in acknowledging +her crime, is obdurate to final exhaustion, how can it +be possibly expected that the Allies who were forced to fight, +will submit to the humiliation and shame of soliciting from their +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_322" id="Page_322">[322]</a></span>cruel enemy a peace the conditions of which, they know, would be +utterly unacceptable. Consequently they must with an indomitable +courage and an invincible perseverance go on struggling to solve, +for a long time, the redoubtable problem to which they are pledged, +in honour bound, to give the only settlement which can reassure +the world."</p></div> + +<p>I am still and absolutely of the same opinion. +The present military situation has certainly much +improved in favour of the Allies since 1916. +However, looking at the question, first, from the +standpoint of the developing military operations, +there is no actual, and there will not be for many +months yet—more or less—practical possibility of +a satisfactory peace settlement.</p> + +<p>Secondly, looking at the question from the +standpoint of true statesmanship, it is very easy +to draw the inexorable conclusion that, again, +there is not actually the least chance of an immediate +restoration of peace.</p> + +<p>Statesmen, responsible, not only for the +future of their respective countries, but, actually, +for that of the whole world, are not to be supposed +liable to be carried away by a hasty desire to put +an end to the war and to their own arduous task +in carrying it to the only possible solution:—<span class="smcap">A +JUST AND DURABLE PEACE</span>.</p> + +<p>A broad and certain fact, staring every one, +is that the Berlin Government will not accept the +only settlement to which the Allies can possibly +agree as long as her armies occupy French and +Belgian territories. If Mr. Bourassa and his +"pacifists" friends—or dupes—have really entertained<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_323" id="Page_323">[323]</a></span> +a faint hope to the contrary, they were +utterly mistaken.</p> + +<p>Present military events, however proportionately +enlarged by the increased resources, in man-power +and money, of the belligerents, are not +without many appropriate precedents. History is +always repeating itself. Great Powers having +risked their all in a drawn battle, do not give in as +long as they can stand the strain, considering the +importance of the interests they have at stake.</p> + +<p>For the same reason above stated, but reversed, +the Allies will not negotiate for peace +before they have thrown the German armies out +of French and Belgian soil, and repulsed them over +Teutonic territory. I do not mean to say that +peace must necessarily be proclaimed either from +Berlin or from Paris. But it will only be signed +as the inevitable result of a final triumphant +march on the way either to Berlin or to Paris. +There is no possible escape from the alternative. +In such matters, there is no halfway station.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_324" id="Page_324">[324]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXXIV.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">After-the-War Military Problem.</span></h3> + + +<p>Two of the most important propositions of +His Holiness the Pope more especially deserve +earnest consideration. They are indeed supported +by the Allies who are purposely fighting for their +adoption.</p> + +<p>In his note of the first of August, 1917, addressed +to the Rulers of the belligerent nations, +the Pope says in part:—</p> + +<p>"<span class="smcap">At first, the fundamental point must be +to substitute the moral force of Right to the +material force of arms.</span>"</p> + +<p>No truer proposition could be enounced. If +Germany had put this principle into practice, she +never would have violated Belgian territory.</p> + +<p>When England protested against the proposed +invasion of Belgium, she did so in obedience to the +sacred principle enunciated by the Sovereign +Pontiff. She strongly insisted to the last minute +that <i>the moral force</i> of solemn treaties should +prevail upon <i>the material force of arms</i>.</p> + +<p>In a letter dated October 7, 1917, His Eminence +Cardinal Gasparri, Secretary of State to His +Holiness, addressing the Archbishop of Lens, +wrote as follows respecting conscription:<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_325" id="Page_325">[325]</a></span>—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"The Holy See, in his Appeal of the first of August, did not +consider, out of deference for the leaders of the belligerent peoples, +that he should mention it, preferring to leave to themselves the +care of determining it, but for him, the only practical system and, +moreover, easy to apply with some good will on both sides, would +be the following: to suppress, with one accord between civilized +nations, military obligatory service; to constitute an arbitration +tribunal, as already said in the Pontifical Appeal, to settle international +questions; finally, to prevent infractions, to establish universal +"boycottage" against any nation attempting to reestablish +military obligatory service, on refusing either to lay an international +question before the arbitration tribunal, or to abide by its +decision."</p></div> + +<p>Cardinal Gasparri then points to the ante-war +British and American systems of military "voluntarism", +in the following terms:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"As a matter of fact, omitting other considerations, the recent +example of England and America testifies in favour of the +adoption of this system. England and America had, in effect, +voluntary service, and, to take an efficient part in the present war, +they were obliged to adopt conscription. It proves that voluntary +service well supplies the necessary contingent to maintain public +order (and is public order not maintained in England and America +just as well, if not better, than in the other nations?) but it does +not supply the enormous armies required for modern warfare. +Consequently in suppressing, with one accord between civilized +nations, obligatory service to replace it by voluntary service, disarmament +with all the happy consequences above indicated would +be automatically obtained without any perturbation of public +order."</p> + +<p>"For the last century, conscription has been the true cause +of calamities which have afflicted society: to reach a simultaneous +and reciprocal suppression will be the true remedy. In fact, once +suppressed, conscription could be reestablished only by a law; and +for such a law, even with the present constitution of the Central +Empires, Parliamentary approbation would be required (which approbation +would be most improbable for many reasons and above +all on account of the sad experience of the present war); in this +way, what is so much desired, for the maintenance of agreements, +would be obtained: the peoples' guarantee. If, on the other hand, +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_326" id="Page_326">[326]</a></span>the right to make peace or war was given to the people by way of +<b>referendum</b>, or at least to Parliament, peace between nations would +be assured, as much at least as it is possible in this world."</p></div> + +<p>It should be very gratifying indeed to all the +loyal subjects of the British Empire to ascertain, +from the declarations of Cardinal Gasparri, that +the Pope is in so complete accord with England on +this the most important question to be settled by +the future peace treaty.</p> + +<p>As proved in one of the first chapters of this +work, the Government of Great Britain, supported +in this course by almost the unanimous opinion of +the peoples of the United Kingdom, was the first +to suggest the holding of the Hague conferences +to consider the best means to adopt to favour the +world with the blessings of permanent peace. +Their own view, which they forcibly expressed, +was that the surest way to reach that much desired +result was to limit the military armaments, both +on land and sea. For more than twenty years +previous to the war, they pressed, and even implored, +for the adoption of their program.</p> + +<p>I have also proved how obdurate Germany +was in resisting England's propositions, and her +successful intrigues to thwart Great Britain's +efforts to have them adopted and put into practice.</p> + +<p>England's policy has not changed. On the +contrary, it is more than ever favourable to the +limitation, and even to the complete abolition, of +armaments, if one or the other can be achieved. +It is the principal war aim of Great Britain, only<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_327" id="Page_327">[327]</a></span> +coming next after her determination to avenge +Belgium.</p> + +<p>The future peace of the world could no doubt +be well guaranteed by a large measure of disarmament. +But it would certainly be much more +so, if complete abolition could be obtained by an +international agreement binding on all nations, +with, of course, the allowance of the necessary +forces required for the maintenance of interior +public order.</p> + +<p>The whole world can safely depend on the +strenuous support of England for either the +limitation or the abolition of armaments whenever +the question is seriously taken up for +consideration.</p> + +<p>Evidently the problem will be difficult to +solve. However, it should not be beyond the +resources of statesmanship which, assuredly, ought +to rise superior to all prejudiced aspirations after +the terrible ordeal Humanity will have experienced +during the present war.</p> + +<p>The maintenance of internal public order, and +permanent preparedness for foreign wars, are two +very different questions to examine. The first can +safely be left to the care of every nation sure to +attend to it if willing to maintain her authority. +The second has a much wider scope and will tax +the ability of statesmanship to the utmost limit.</p> + +<p>Will the great civilized nations decide, when +the war is over, to completely abolish conscription +to return to voluntary military service within a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_328" id="Page_328">[328]</a></span> +very limited organization, thus doing away by a +bold and single stroke with a system which, for +more than a hundred years, has been the curse of +continental Europe?</p> + +<p>Or will they, at least as an initial attempt, +come to the conclusion to only limit armaments, +maintaining compulsory service for the reduced +strength of the armies?</p> + +<p>If armaments are either abolished, or merely +reduced, will they be so on sea as well as on land? +I would answer at once:—of course, they should.</p> + +<p>Looking at the question from the British +stand-point—and I can also say from that of the +United States—it should be easily solved.</p> + +<p>Public opinion in Great Britain and all over +the British Empire, as well as in the United +States, has always been against conscription in +peace times, until the present war.</p> + +<p>Not exactly foreseeing the full extent of the +effort she would be called upon to make, England +entered into the conflict determined to meet the +requirements of her military situation out of the +resources of voluntary enlistment. Canada, joining +in the struggle, did the same. Both have done +wonderfully well during the three first years of +the prolonged war.</p> + +<p>I can, without the slightest hesitation, positively +assert that public opinion, in the whole +British Empire, and, not only in the United States, +but in the whole of the two American continents, +is, as a matter of principle, as much hostile to compulsory<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_329" id="Page_329">[329]</a></span> +military service as it was before the present +war, and would exult at its complete abolition +as one of the happiest results of the gigantic +contest still going on.</p> + +<p>It is to be deplored, but still it is a fact, that +great questions of public interest too often cannot +be settled solely in conformity with the principles +they imply.</p> + +<p>If Great Britain, if the United States, if +Canada, could consider the question of conscription +exclusively from their own stand-point, they +would most surely decide at once, and with great +enthusiasm, to abolish the obligatory military +service they have adopted only as a last resort +under the stress of imperious necessity.</p> + +<p>Moreover, I have no hesitation to express my +own opinion that whatever will be the military +system of continental Europe after the war, the +British Empire and the United States will certainly +not be cursed with permanent conscription. +They are both so happily situated that, in peace +times, they cannot be called upon to go very +extensively into the costly preparedness which the +European continental nations will have again to +submit themselves to, if they are not wise enough +to put an end forever to the barbarous militarism +they have too long endured for fear of Teutonic +domination.</p> + +<p>Under the worst European situation, England, +with a territorial army of a million of men ready +to be called to the Colours, or actually flying them,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_330" id="Page_330">[330]</a></span> +backed by her mighty fleet maintained to its highest +state of efficiency, could always face any continental +enemy. And such an army of a ready +million of well trained officers and men, voluntary +service would easily produce.</p> + +<p>If future conditions would require it, Canada +herself could do her share to prepare for any +emergency by reverting to voluntary enlistment, +but in improving the service so as to produce more +immediate efficiency.</p> + +<p>Very apparently, the United States will come +out of the present conflict with flying Colours and +will dispense with compulsory service under any +circumstances in the peace days to follow.</p> + +<p>What then will the continental powers do? +Blessed they will be, if they make up their mind +to do away, once for all, with a system which has +crushed the peoples so unmercifully.</p> + +<p>To speak in all frankness, I believe it would +be almost vain, however much desirable it is, to +indulge in fond hopes of the complete abolition of +militarism on the European continent. The canker +is too deep in the flesh and blood of nations to be +extirpated as if by magic. Such a reversal of +conditions grown to extravagant proportions, during +more than a century, will not likely be accomplished +at the first stroke. Let us all hope that, at +least, a good start will be made by a large limitation +of armaments which may, with time, lead to +the final achievement for which the whole world +would be forever grateful to the Almighty.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_331" id="Page_331">[331]</a></span> +I have positively stated that extravagant +militarism should be discontinued on sea as well +as on land. Such has been the policy of England +for many years past. I have proved it by the +diplomatic correspondence between Great Britain +and Germany, and the solemn declarations of all +the leading British statesmen for the last quarter +of a century. How persistingly England has implored +Germany to agree with her in stopping that +ruinous race in the building of war vessels, we +have seen.</p> + +<p>So, the assent, nay more, the determination of +England to adhere to her old and noble policy, is a +foregone conclusion.</p> + +<p>The closing sentence of the last quoted paragraph +of Cardinal Gasparri's letter expresses the +opinion that "<i>the right to make peace or war +should be given to the people by way of referendum, +or at least to Parliament</i>."</p> + +<p>The system preconized by the Eminent +Cardinal has been in existence in England for a +number of years; ever since the day when complete +ministerial responsibility was adopted as the +fundamental principle of the British constitution. +That system was carried to the letter by Great +Britain with regard to her intervention in the +present war.</p> + +<p>The right to declare war and to make peace is +one of the most important prerogatives of the +British Crown. This prerogative of the Crown, +like all the others, is held in trust by the Sovereign<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_332" id="Page_332">[332]</a></span> +for the benefit of the people and exercised by Him +<span class="smcap">ONLY UPON THE ADVICE AND RESPONSIBILITY OF HIS +MINISTERS</span>.</p> + +<p>In conformity with this great British constitutional +principle, what happened in London, in +August, 1914? The then Prime Minister, Mr. +Asquith, in his own name and in those of his +colleagues, advised His Majesty King George V. +to declare war against Germany because she had +invaded Belgian territory in violation of the +treaties by which these two countries were, in honour +bound, to protect Belgium's neutrality. They +were constitutionally responsible to the Imperial +Parliament and to the people of the United +Kingdom for their advice to their Sovereign.</p> + +<p>In his admirable statement to the British +House of Commons, Sir Edward Grey, Secretary +of State for Foreign Affairs, said:—</p> + +<p>"<i>I have assured the House—and the Prime +Minister has assured the House more than once—that +if any crisis such as this arose, we should +come before the House of Commons and be able to +say to the House that it was free to decide what +the British attitude should be, that we would have +no secret engagement which we should spring upon +the House, and tell the House that, because we had +entered into that engagement, there was an obligation +of honour upon the country.</i>"</p> + +<p>The British House of Commons, had they +considered it to be their duty, had the right to disapprove +the foreign policy of the Cabinet and to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_333" id="Page_333">[333]</a></span> +censure the ministers for the advice they had given, +or had decided to give, to the Sovereign. On the +other hand, the House of Commons had the right +to approve the stand taken by the Government. +They did so unanimously, and were most admirably +supported by the people.</p> + +<p>I must say that I consider it would be very +difficult, if not absolutely impracticable, to have +questions of war or peace dealt with by way of +"<i>Referendum</i>." Crises suddenly created lead almost +instantly to declarations of war. But this +outcome could hardly be so rapidly produced that +Parliament could not be called to deal with the +emergency.</p> + +<p>How could France have been able to oppose +the crushing German invasion, in 1914, if her +Government and her representative Houses had +been obliged to wait for the result of a "<i>Referendum</i>" +whether she would fight or kneel down?</p> + +<p>But the whole world—outside the Central +Empires and their Allies—witnessed with unbounded +delight the spontaneous and unanimous +decision of the heroic French nation to fight to the +last. She threw herself with the most admirable +courage against the invading waves of Teutonic +barbarism, and succeeded by the great and +glorious Marne victory in forcing them to ebb, thus +giving England and the other Allies the time +necessary to organize and train their armies which, +by their united efforts will save Civilization from +destruction and the world from the threatened +German domination.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_334" id="Page_334">[334]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXXV.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Intervention of the United States in the +War.</span></h3> + + +<p>The hostilities, once opened as the direct consequence +of Germany's obduracy, many of the most +influential leaders of public opinion in the United +States foresaw that the conflict taking such a wide +range, the great American Republic was most +likely to be, sooner or later, involved in the +European struggle. They were of two classes. +Those out of office, holding for the time no official +position, were, of course, not bound to the same +careful discretion in judging the daily developments +of the military operations, and their far +reaching consequences, as those who were at the +helm of State.</p> + +<p>In appreciating the course followed by the +United States since the war commenced, it must +never be forgotten that if an autocratic Empire, +trampled upon by a domineering military party, +can be thrown in a minute into a great conflict, a +Republic like that of our powerful neighbours +cannot be dragooned into any hasty action. In a +free country, under a responsible government, +public opinion is the basis of the success of any +important official decision.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_335" id="Page_335">[335]</a></span></p> + +<p>The political men and the numerous publicists +who incessantly called the attention of our neighbours +to what was going on in Europe and on the +seas, have rendered a great service in moulding +public opinion for the grand duty the Republic +would eventually be obliged to accomplish.</p> + +<p>Having ourselves decided to participate in the +war at once after its outbreak, and deeply engaged +in the task, we, Canadians, felt somewhat uneasy +about the apparent determination of our neighbours +to stand aside, and let the European Powers +settle the ugly question. As a rule, we were all +wishing to see the United States joining with the +Allies in the fray.</p> + +<p>Once again, we had some black sheep with us. +Whilst all the loyal Canadians were anxiously +waiting for the day when they would applaud the +American Republic's declaration of war against +Germany, our Nationalists were getting more +nervous at the increasing signs of the growth of +public opinion amongst our neighbours against the +criminal German cause and the crimes by which +the Teutons were supporting it. Their leader, Mr. +Bourassa, was doing his best to persuade the +Americans that they had much better to remain +out of the struggle. He expected he would succeed, +as he had done in the Province of Quebec, in influencing, +by his erroneous theories, many of the +French Canadian element in the United States.</p> + +<p>The wish being always father to the thought, +Mr. Bourassa easily came to the conclusion that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_336" id="Page_336">[336]</a></span> +Mr. Wilson, the president of the United States, +was decidedly opposed to any intervention of the +Republic in the war, and would prevent it at all +hazards. How prodigal he was of his eulogiums, +of his advices, to the American "pacifists," with +the President as their leader, to know one has only +to read his newspaper "<i>Le Devoir</i>."</p> + +<p>How disappointed, how crest-fallen, he was +when he discovered how much mistaken he had +been!</p> + +<p>When Mr. Wilson, who had long been waiting +for the right hour to strike the blow at the Teutonic +autocratic attempt at domination, rising grandly +to the rank of a great statesman, supported by +the splendid strength of the public opinion he +had wisely and skilfully rallied in favour of the +decision he had taken, was a sad day for our +Nationalists and their heart-broken leader. Blind, +prejudiced, as they were, meekly pandering to +pan-Germanism which they considered as the +best antidote to the Anglo-Saxonism they abhor, +they could not understand that the Lusitania +horror, the slaughtering of hundreds of American +citizens in violation of all the principles of +International Law, the crimes of the Teutonic +submarine campaign more than justified the +intervention of the United States in the war.</p> + +<p>What our neighbours have done since they +have joined with the Allies, what they are doing +and promise to do, is worthy of all admiration. +Like the British Empire, like France, the United<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_337" id="Page_337">[337]</a></span> +States have given the inspiring example of a most +enlightened patriotism, of a splendid unity of +purpose, of a boundless confidence in the triumph +of the cause of Justice and Right.</p> + +<p>Such a grand spectacle of true national unity +offered a striking contrast with the sad exhibition +of the narrow Nationalism Canada has had to +endure without, however, hindering to any appreciable +extent our loyal and patriotic effort to help +winning the war.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa, who had been out of his natural +vituperative tune in complimenting Mr. Wilson on +his supposed peace proclivities, was sure to turn +his guns against the President of the Republic the +moment he boldly and energetically took his stand +against German barbarism as exhibited since the +beginning of the war. Mr. Wilson had especially +protested against such outrages as were perpetrated +on the seas by Teutonic orders. He had repeatedly +warned the Berlin Government what the +inevitable consequences of such proceedings would +be, and going to the full length of what friendly +relations between two Sovereign States could permit, +had demanded that an end be put to a kind of +warfare most formally condemned by International +Law, contrary to all justice, to all human +notions of civilization.</p> + +<p>When the cup of German iniquities overflowed +with new crimes, American reprobation was also +raised to the high water mark. Indignation was +at the height of its exasperation. Public opinion<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_338" id="Page_338">[338]</a></span> +had rapidly rallied and ripened at the horrible +sight of so many American citizens, women and +children, murdered in mid-ocean, their dead bodies +floating over the waves, and their souls from above +crying for vengeance.</p> + +<p>Then the President, Congress, statesmen, politicians, +publicists, loyal Americans numbering +almost a hundred million, all of one mind, of one +heart, pledged their national honour to avenge the +foul deeds of Teutonic barbarity, and to do their +mighty share in rescuing Freedom and Civilization +from the threatening sanguinary cataclysm +which was cruelly saddening our times and darkening +the prospects of our children.</p> + +<p>How powerfully, how grandly, how admirably +they have kept their word, all know. The laws +necessary to prosecute the war with the utmost +vigour were unanimously passed by Congress. The +organization of the man-power of our neighbours +has been made on a grand scale. The calls to the +financial resources of the Republic have been +patriotically answered by the people who poured +out billions and billions of their hard earned and +prudently saved money to support the national +cause so closely identified with that of the Allies. +Besides spending innumerable millions for their +own gigantic military effort, the United States are +lending billions of dollars to their associates in the +great struggle to curb down German autocratic +criminal ambition.</p> + +<p>The universe, as a whole, gratefully applauded<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_339" id="Page_339">[339]</a></span> +the magnificent effort of the leading nation of +the New-World in defending the old continents of +Europe, Asia and Africa against the new invasion +of the Huns.</p> + +<p>The only shadow to this ennobling picture is +that which our Nationalists, from this side of the +boundary line, try to breathe on it, expecting that +their treacherous whisper will find some echo +amongst the French Canadian and the German +elements of the Republic.</p> + +<p>The following lines are a sample of the kind +words Mr. Bourassa has addressed to Mr. Wilson—the +warrior—not the pacifist. On August 30, +1917, respecting the answer of the President of the +United States to the Pope's appeal in favour of +peace, he wrote in a gentle mood:—</p> + +<p>"<i>Truth and falsehood, sincerity and deceit, +logic and sophism are sporting with gracefulness +in this singularly astonishing document. One would +imagine that the President, persuaded that the +European Governments are playing an immense +game of "poker" having the life of the peoples at +stake, wanted to go further and to prove to them +that at such a game the great American democracy +is their master. Perhaps did he believe that the +"bluff" outbidding would succeed in tearing to +pieces the mask of falsehoods, of ambiguities and +hypocrisy, by which the national Rulers are blinding +the peoples in order to lead them more readily +to be slaughtered.</i>"</p> + +<p>On perusing such outrageous writing, one +cannot help being convinced that Mr. Bourassa<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_340" id="Page_340">[340]</a></span> +considers all the distinguished and most patriotic +political leaders who, for the last four years, have +guided with so much talent and devotion France, +the British Empire, and their Allies through the +unprecedented crisis they have had to face, are a +criminal gang of murderers.</p> + +<p>So, in Mr. Bourassa's kind opinion, when Mr. +Wilson and all the members of the two Houses +of Congress, with a most admirable unanimity of +thought and aspirations, called upon the American +nation to avenge their countrymen, countrywomen +and children, murdered on the broad sea, they +were criminally joining with European Rulers +in a game of "bluff", going further than all of them +in order to tear to pieces the falsehoods and hypocrisy +they were using to blind their peoples to the +facile acceptance of the slaughtering process. A +very strange way, indeed, of unmasking others' +hypocrisy by being more hypocritical than them +all.</p> + +<p>The next day, in a second article on the same +subject, the Nationalist leader said:—</p> + +<p>"<i>Since the outbreak of the war, more especially +since the exhausted peoples have commenced to +ask themselves what will be the result of this +frightful slaughter, the supporters of war to the +utmost have tried hard to create the legend that +Germany wants to impose her political, military +and economical domination over the whole universe. +To this first falsehood, they add another +one, still more complete: the only way to assure +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_341" id="Page_341">[341]</a></span> +peace, they say, is to democratize Germany, +Austria and all the nations of the Globe.</i>"</p> + +<p>Two falsehoods no doubt there are, but they +are not asserted by those who affirm Germany's aspiration +at universal domination, and who believe +that if true free democratic institutions were to +replace autocratic rule in many countries, peace +could be much more easily maintained. They are +circulated by those who deny that such are the two +cases.</p> + +<p>Whose fault is it if the almost universal opinion, +outside the Central Empires and their few +allies, is that Teutonic ambition, for many years +past, has been to dominate the world?</p> + +<p>Whose fault is it if, for the last forty years, +autocratic rule has once more proved to be the +curse of the nations which it governs, and of the +peoples it subjugates?</p> + +<p>Has not Germany only herself to blame? If +she had respected the eternal principles of Divine +Morals; if she had been contented of her lot and +mindful of the rights of other nations; if she had +been guided by the true law that Right is above +Might; if she had followed the ever glorious path +of Justice, she would not be presently under the +ban of the civilized world rising in a mighty effort +to crush her threatening tyranny out of existence.</p> + +<p>So much the worse for her, if she falls a victim +to her insane ambitious dreams and to the atrocious +crimes they have inspired her to commit. In +her calamity, the Nationalists' sympathies will<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_342" id="Page_342">[342]</a></span> +avail her very little, as they will everywhere meet +with the contempt they fully deserve.</p> + +<p>At page 116, in a virulent charge, Mr. Bourassa +says that Mr. Wilson <i>though a passionate and +obstinate pedantic of democracy, is as much of an +autocrat as William of Prussia</i>.</p> + +<p>Blinded by his fanatical antipathies towards +every one and every thing, directly or indirectly, +favouring England, the Nationalist leader fails to +see any difference between the man who blasphemously +claims by Divine Right the power to hurl his +whole Empire at the throat of staggering Humanity, +to satisfy his frenzied lust of domination, +denying to his subjects any say whatever in the +matter, and the responsible chief of State who, +holding his temporary functions from the expressed +will of the people who trusted him, calls +upon that same nation to avenge the murder of a +large number of her citizens, of her women and +children, and the barbarous crimes committed in +violation of her Sovereign Rights.</p> + +<p>If Mr. Bourassa is conscious of the enormity +of the stand he has taken, and of the views he has +expressed, he is indeed much to be blamed; if he is +not, he is greatly to be pitied.</p> + +<p>At page 109 of his pamphlet—entitled:—"<i>The +Pope, arbiter of peace</i>," Mr. Bourassa has written +the following monstrous proposition, after having +said that peace must be restored "<i>without victory</i>":—</p> + +<p>"<i>The more the results of the war are null, for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_343" id="Page_343">[343]</a></span> +both sides, the more chances there are for the +peoples, astounded at the frightful uselessness of +those monstrous slaughters, to protect themselves +against a new fit of furious folly. To become +odious to men, war must be barren.</i>"</p> + +<p>So Mr. Bourassa has emphatically proclaimed +that the war must be barren of any practical results, +that the extraordinary sacrifices of lives, of +resources of wealth, must be without reward of +any kind; that the world must return to the ante-war +conditions. And this, he asserts, would be +the best means of preventing a renewal of the +monstrous slaughters which have been the outcome +of Germany's horrible attempt at dominating +an enslaved Humanity.</p> + +<p>In all sincerity, it is very difficult to suppose +that the exponent of such outrageously abominable +views is conscious of what he says.</p> + +<p>A red hot "pacifist," Mr. Bourassa clamoured +as best he could for "<span class="smcap">PEACE WITHOUT VICTORY</span>," +claiming that it was <i>the only kind of peace that +could be "just and durable."</i> The time was when +he pretended—surely without any show of reason—that +such was the sort of peace Mr. Wilson +wanted and suggested.</p> + +<p>Even as far back as December 31, 1915, Mr. +Bourassa, no doubt desirous of giving full vent to +his new year's wishes to all, had written:—</p> + +<p>"<i>In spite of the lies, of the impudent "bluff," +of the sanguinary appeals and of the false promises +of victory of the partisans of war to excess, in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_344" id="Page_344">[344]</a></span> +all the warring countries, popular good sense +commences to discern truth.... +The more victory</i> (the issue) <i>will be materially +null and sterile for all the nations at war, the more +chances there will be that peace will be lasting and +that the peoples will be convinced that war is not +only an abominable crime but an incommensurable +folly</i>."</p> + +<p>Evidently it had already become a hobby on +the brain of the Nationalist leader. He dogmatically +proclaims that war between peoples—not the +wars formerly fought by mercenary armies,—is a +<i>crime</i>,—<i>abominable</i>,—and a <i>folly</i>,—<i>incommensurable</i>.</p> + +<p>True it is on the part of a State tramping upon +all the principles of Justice and of International +Law to gratify her guilty ambition.</p> + +<p>But honourable, glorious, is war on the part +of peoples rising in their patriotic might to resist +a sanguinary enemy, to defend their countries, +their homes, their mothers, their wives and their +children from oppression, to stem the conquering +efforts of barbarous invaders.</p> + +<p>No doubt it was a crime on the part of Germany +to break her pledged honour by solemn +treaties, and to violate Belgium's territory.</p> + +<p>No doubt it was a crime for Germany—and +one abominable—to overrun Belgium, spreading +everywhere desolation, devastation, incendiarism, +murder.</p> + +<p>But can it be said that the admirable and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_345" id="Page_345">[345]</a></span> +heroic resistance Belgium has opposed to her +tyrannical invaders was a dastardly crime?</p> + +<p>No doubt it was a crime—and one most +abominable—for Germany to order the sinking of +the Lusitania and hundreds of merchant ships, +without the warning required by the Law of +Nations, murdering by hundreds non-combatants, +children, women, and old men.</p> + +<p>But can any one be justified in asserting that, +after exhausting, for the redress of such abominable +wrongs, all the resources of diplomacy, the +United States were committing a crime when they +accepted the criminal teutonic challenge and decided +to join with the British Empire, with France, +Italy and their Allies, to rescue human Freedom +and Civilization from the impending destruction?</p> + +<p>It is an aberration of mind—incommensurable +in depth—for a publicist, or any one else, to be so +blinded by prejudices, so lost to all sense of justice, +as to place on the same footing, on the same level, +the assailant and he who defends his all, the +murderer and the victim.</p> + +<p>I positively affirm that I am not actuated by +the least ill-will or ill-feeling against the Nationalist +leader, in judging his course and his views as I +do. Thank God, I know enough of the teachings +of Christianity to wish good to all men. But I +cannot help being deeply sorry and deploring that +one of my French Canadian compatriots is buried +in such mental darkness as to be unable to perceive +the difference—incommensurable—there is in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_346" id="Page_346">[346]</a></span> +present war between the hideous Teutonic guilt, +and the commendable and meritorious defence by +the Allied nations of the most sacred cause on +earth:—outraged Justice.</p> + +<p>And with all sincerity, I express the profound +wish that during the prolonged recess the timely +war measure adopted to censure and prevent all +utterances detrimental to the best Canadian effort +in the conflict, the Nationalist leader has the pleasure +to enjoy, he will reconsider the whole situation +and his opinions—too much widely circulated. Is +it yet possible to hope that, at last, he will see the +dawn which will lead him to the full light with +which the great and noble cause of his country and +of the world is shining?</p> + +<p>It is no surprise that such opinions utterly +failed to have any echo amongst the liberty loving +people of the neighbouring Republic. They died +their merited shameful death before crossing over +the boundary line, buried deep under the heap of +the profound feelings of reprobation they provoked.</p> + +<p>The Nationalist leader even missed the mark +where he felt sure his shot would strike. We can +rest assured that the large majority of the United +States Germans, by birth or origin, would not +change the responsible President of their new +country for the autocrat Kaiser from whose absolutist +power so many of them fled to breathe freely +in the new land of promise it was their happy lot +to enter.</p> + +<p>Mr. Bourassa met with a complete failure in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_347" id="Page_347">[347]</a></span> +his expectation to arouse the feelings of his compatriots +over the frontier against the intervention +of the Republic in the war.</p> + +<p>It has been a profound satisfaction for us, +French Canadians, to learn that from the very +moment war was declared by the Republic against +Germany, the French Canadian element in the +United States has been to the forefront of the most +loyal of our friendly neighbours in fighting the +common enemy.</p> + +<p>The French Canadians of the United States, +either by birth or origin, have wisely turned a deaf +ear to the Nationalist leader's seductive but prejudiced +theories, to the wild charges he was wont +to level at all the national rulers of the Allies, and, +as a final attempt, at those of the American +Republic. They have rallied to their Colours with +enthusiastic patriotism.</p> + +<p>They have nobly done their duty. They are +doing it, and will continue to do so to the last: to +the final victory for which they are fighting with +the patriotic desire to share in the glory of the +triumph of their country.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_348" id="Page_348">[348]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXXVI.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Allies—Russia—Japan.</span></h3> + + +<p>Since its outbreak the great war has, and, before +it is over, will have, played havoc in many +ways in the wide world. Criminal aspirations +have been quashed, extravagant hopes shattered, +an ancient throne overthrown almost without a +clash, an autocrat sovereign murdered, another +forced to abdicate and go into exile.</p> + +<p>In the open airs, on land, over the waves, +under sea, the fighting demon has been most actively +at work, ordering one of the belligerent, eager to +obey, to spare no one, young, weak or old. Death +has been dropped from the skies on sleeping non-combatants, +assassinating right and left. On the +soil Providentially provided with the resources necessary +to human life, homes have been ruined, +their so far happy owners brutally murdered. On +the ocean the treacherous and barbarous submariner, +operating in the broad light of the day, or +in the darkness of the night, has sent, without remorse, +to the fathomless bottom, thousands and +thousands of innocent victims, children, women, +old men, wounded soldiers spared on land but +drowned at sea.</p> + +<p>Viewed from the height of a much nobler standpoint,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_349" id="Page_349">[349]</a></span> +the war has developed a superior degree of +heroism perhaps never equalled. Belgians, Serbians, +Poles, Armenians have endured, and are +still suffering, their prolonged martyrdom with a +fortitude deserving the greatest admiration.</p> + +<p>The nations united to withstand the torrent +of German cruel and depraved ambition are writing, +with the purest of their blood, pages of history +which, for all times to come, will offer to posterity +unrivalled examples of the sound and unswerving +patriotism which has elevated them all to the indomitable +determination to bear patiently, perseveringly, +all the sacrifices, in lives courageously +given, in resources profusely spent, in taxation +willingly accepted and paid, in works of all kinds +cheerfully performed, which the salvation of +human Liberty and Civilization shall require.</p> + +<p>The collapse of the ancient and hitherto +mighty Empire of Russia will undoubtedly be one +of the most startling events of the "Great War." +For the present, I shall not comment, on the causes +of this momentous episode, incidental to the wonderful +drama being played on the worldly stage, +more than I have done in a previous chapter. +Still the important change it has made in the respective +situation of the belligerents, with the prospective +consequences likely to follow, one way or +the other, calls for some timely consideration.</p> + +<p>Evidently, the downfall, first, of the Imperial +regime, second, of the <i>de facto</i> Republican government +by which it was replaced, throwing the great<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_350" id="Page_350">[350]</a></span> +Eastern ally of Great Britain, France and Italy +under the tyrannical sway of the "bolchevikis" terrorists, +most considerably altered the relative +strength of the fighting power of the belligerents. +Very detrimental to the Allies, it was largely +favourable to the Central Empires. The "Triple +Entente" as first constituted, was much weakened +by the desertion of one of the great partners in the +heavy task they had undertaken, whilst the "Triple +Alliance" was strengthened in a relative proportion, +at least for the time being and the very near +future.</p> + +<p>Evidence, incontrovertible, is coming to light, +proving what had been soundly presumed, that +"bolchevikism" was not merely the result, as in +other instances, of the violence of sanguinary +revolutionists overpowering a regular progressive +movement of political freedom and reform, but that +it has been the outcome of German intrigue easily +succeeding in corrupting into shameless treason +the "bolchevikis" leaders.</p> + +<p>As a Sovereign State, as an independent nation, +Russia was, in honour bound, pledged not to +consent to a separate peace, and to make peace +with Germany only with conditions to which all +the Allies would agree. Acceptance of, and concurrence +in, all peace agreements, were the essential +clause of the pledge Great Britain, France and +Russia had reciprocally taken in going to war with +the Central Empires. With this sacred pledge +Italy concurred fully on joining the Allies.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_351" id="Page_351">[351]</a></span></p> + +<p>To that solemn pledge, the American Republic +has emphatically assented when she threw her +weighty sword in the balance against blood stained +and murderous Germany.</p> + +<p>The "bolchevikis'" treacherous government +repudiated the solemn engagement of their country, +threw her honour to the winds, sold her dearest +national interests by the infamous Brest-Litovsk +treaty. Betrayed Russia was out of the +war, leaving her Allies to their fate.</p> + +<p>From a military point of view, the consequences +were easily foreseen. Freed from the +danger of further attacks on the eastern front, +both Germany and Austria could send their eastern +armies, the first, on the western front in +France, the second, on the Italian front. Germany, +only requiring a sufficient force to keep down +trodden Russia under the yoke treacherously +fastened on her neck by the traitors who had +ignominiously sold their country to her enemy, and +anxious to profit to the utmost by her success in +coercing the Russians to agree to dishonourable +peace conditions, hurried more than a million men +over to the western front. Austria did likewise, +sending a large force with the hope of smashing the +Italians out of the fight.</p> + +<p>Those were no doubt very anxious days. All +remember how the Italian army lost in a very short +time all the ground they had so stubbornly +conquered.</p> + +<p>Germany made formidable preparations to +strike, in the very early spring of the present year,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_352" id="Page_352">[352]</a></span> +a decisive blow by which she fully expected to +reach and take Paris. We shall never forget the +feverish hours we lived when came the successive +reports of the crushing advance of the Teutonic +hordes so close to the illustrious capital of France.</p> + +<p>For a while, it seemed to be—and really it +was—a renewal of the first terrific invasion of +northern France, in 1914. Fortunately, it was +Providentially decreed that the second onslaught +was to meet with a second Marne disaster. The +Huns were forced to retire after a tremendous loss +of men and war materials, the allied armies, brilliantly +led and fighting heroically, redeeming all +the lost territory and, at the moment I am writing, +moving steadily towards the German frontier.</p> + +<p>The great good luck of the Allies, treasonably +sacrificed by the Russian bolchevikis terrorist government, +was the solemn entry of the United States +into the European conflict.</p> + +<p>Preparing for the grand effort which she confidently +expected would be final, Germany rashly +decided to resume her barbarous submarine campaign, +positively determined to criminally violate +all the principles of International Law regulating +warfare on the seas. That outrageous decision +was her fatal doom.</p> + +<p>Its direct result was to bring the American +Republic into the war. And then the whole world +was called upon to witness, with unbounded delight, +the very impressive spectacle of millions of +fighting free men being successfully transported +over the sea, and landed on the French soil, to join<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_353" id="Page_353">[353]</a></span> +the grand army which, for the last four years, had +been resisting the full might of the autocratic +forces.</p> + +<p>However difficult it is to foretell what the +political developments of the present deplorable +Russian situation will be, still it is not illusory to +believe that, history once more repeating itself, the +present sanguinary Russian regime will hasten its +well deserved ignominious downfall by the very +brutal excesses it multiplies in its delirious tyranny. +There are too many elements of the immense +population of Russia favourable to an +orderly and sensible government, to suppose that +they will long fail to gather their strength in order +to redeem their country's honour, and to remove +from power the traitors who are the shame of their +fair land. When the infallible reaction sets in, +it will increase the more in momentum that it will +have been longer repressed by foul means.</p> + +<p>The most important point of the present +Russian situation to consider is that of the best +initiative the Allies could, and ought to, take respecting +the military question.</p> + +<p>Many are of opinion that it would be possible, +for the Allies, to help Russia out of the present +difficulties by an armed support. Such views have +been more especially expressed in the United +States. Could they, or can they be carried out? +I must say that in a large measure I share the +opinion of those who would give an affirmative +answer to the question.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_354" id="Page_354">[354]</a></span></p> + +<p>It is well known that the matter has been +most seriously considered by the Allies, and a +favourable solution seems on the way of a +satisfactory realization.</p> + +<p>To the armed intervention of the Allies in +Russia, following closely upon the infamous Brest-Litovsk +peace treaty, there was a very serious +obstacle of German creation.</p> + +<p>It was evident, at the very start, that if intervention +there was to be, the one Ally to play the +most important part in the great undertaking +would be Japan.</p> + +<p>The British statesmen who, several years ago, +brought about the treaty of alliance between Great +Britain and Japan have deserved much from the +Empire and from the world generally. Surely +they had a clear insight of the future. True to her +treaty obligations Japan at once sided with Great +Britain in the war. All those who have closely +followed the trend of events since the outbreak of +the hostilities, know how much Japan has done to +assist in chasing the German military and mercantile +fleets from the high seas, more especially +from the Pacific ocean. Canada owes her a debt of +gratitude for the protection she has afforded our +western British Columbia coast from the raids of +German war ships.</p> + +<p>Foreseeing that the proximity of Japan to +eastern Russia was an inducement for the Allies to +decide upon an armed intervention which, starting +from Siberia, might roll westward over the +broad lands leading back to the European eastern<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_355" id="Page_355">[355]</a></span> +war front, Germany lost no time in trying to poison +Russian public opinion against the Japanese. +Her numerous representatives and agents told the +Russians that if they allowed Japan to send her +army on Russian territory, they would be doomed +to fall under Japanese sway. They recalled the +still recent Russo-Japanese war, amplifying the +supposed aims of Japan so as to stir up the national +feelings of the Russians. Such a cry, assiduously +and widely spread, was no doubt a dangerous +one.</p> + +<p>Under those circumstances, Japan wisely decided +to remain in the expectation of further developments +before moving. She took the safe stand +that she would intervene only upon the request of +the Russians themselves, pledging her word of +honour that her only purpose would be to free +Russia from German domination, and that she +would withdraw from Russian territory as soon as +complete Russian independence would have been +restored and the treacherous Teutonic aims foiled.</p> + +<p>Evidences are increasing in number and importance +that the Huns' propaganda in Russia +against Japan is being successfully counteracted +by the good sense of the people, realizing how much +their vital national interests have been trampled +upon by Germany in imposing her peace conditions +on their country betrayed by the bolchevikis rulers.</p> + +<p>An armed Allied force has been sent to, and +has been, for some weeks, operating, in Siberia so +far with commendable results.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_356" id="Page_356">[356]</a></span></p> + +<p>For one, I have most at heart an expectation +which I would be most happy to see realized. It +seems to me that there ought to be a chance, nay +more, a possibility, for the Allies to organize, +between this day and next spring, a strongly supported +intervention in Russia. In that event, +Japan of course, would take the lead. She could +rapidly send to help the Russians to resume their +part in the war against Germany at least a million +of men; two millions if they were needed. As a +guarantee of Japan's good faith, the Allies, more +especially the United States, could send over +contingents to Siberia.</p> + +<p>There is no doubt whatever that so supported, +the revulsion of Russian public feeling, once set in +motion, would soon overwhelm the bolchevikis. +A sensible and patriotic government, once at the +helm of the state, could easily and rapidly reorganize +a powerful army out of the numerous available +millions. The financial aspect of the question +would certainly be the most difficult for Russia to +meet, after the exhaustive strain she has had to +bear. But however great their moneyed effort, +the United States could yet do a great deal to help +Russia financially.</p> + +<p>Will the hopes of so many be realized, and will +Russia, resuming her place of honour in the glorious +ranks of the Allies, be found battling once +more with them when together they will finally +crush the German tyrannical militarism? God +only knows, and time will tell.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_357" id="Page_357">[357]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXXVII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">The Last Peace Proposals.</span></h3> + + +<p>I was writing the last pages of this work when +the surprising news was flashed over the cable that +Austria-Hungary had taken the initiative of suggesting +peace discussion, which proposition she +had communicated to all the belligerents, to the +neutral governments and even to the Holy See. +Without delay the rumour proved to be true. The +very next day the full text of Austria's communication +was published all over the world.</p> + +<p>I have read it with great care and, I confess, +with profound amazement.</p> + +<p>From several stand-points, this document is +astonishing and weighty: astonishing as it reveals +more than ever before the astuteness of the inspiration +which dictated it; weighty because it +derives its importance from one of the most serious +situation of the world's affairs ever recorded +in History.</p> + +<p>It is difficult to suppose that the Austrian +Government really expected that their move would +be considered as the outcome of their own initiative. +Not the hand, but the sword—the dominating +sword—behind the Throne is clearly visible.</p> + +<p>The carefully drafted document, issued from<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_358" id="Page_358">[358]</a></span> +Vienna, was evidently dictated from Berlin. It is +stamped with the Teutonic seal.</p> + +<p>After the experience of the last four years—I +can safely say of the last half century as well—over +credulous is he who believes that, swayed as +she has been by her overpowering northern neighbour, +Austria would have dared to address such a +proposition to the Allies if she had not been asked +by Germany to do so.</p> + +<p>It is rather amusing to read the news cabled +from Amsterdam, Holland, on the 20th of September, +that an official communication issued in +Berlin said that the German Ambassador in +Vienna that day presented Germany's reply to the +recent Austro-Hungarian peace note. The purport +of the note was that Germany agreed to participate +in the proposed exchange of views. This is +indeed high class cynicism.</p> + +<p>The document would certainly call for somewhat +lengthy and strong comments, but they can +be dispensed with after the curt, sharp and decisive +reply it has elicited from those it was intended to +seduce and deceive.</p> + +<p>President Wilson was the first to answer a +positive, a formidable NO, which, thundered out +from Washington, was echoed with equal force in +London, Paris and Rome. So that the astute attempt +to deter the Allies from the glorious course +they were forced to adopt by Germany, and by +Austria herself, was doomed to failure, and bound +to meet with the contempt it deserved.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_359" id="Page_359">[359]</a></span></p> + +<p>But a few remarks expressing the retort that +strikes one's mind on reading the Austrian communication, +are in order and had better be made. +The whole stress of the document is that peace +should be restored as soon as possible on account +of the sacrifices and sufferings war nowadays entail, +and in conformity with the unanimous wishes +of the peoples engaged in the conflict.</p> + +<p>Did Austria ever suppose that, when she addressed +that sadly famous and outrageous ultimatum +to Servia, dated the 23rd of July, 1914, which +she well knew would bring about the cataclysm +she now feigns to deplore—and which Germany +and herself were longing for—the war would be +only a child's play, a game of golf, or something of +the kind? Was Austria at that time cherishing +the kind feelings of the German Kronprinz +who, on being asked by an American lady, in a +social event, at Berlin, why he was so desirous of +seeing a great war, replied that "<i>it was only for +the fun of the thing</i>?"</p> + +<p>That war, when once declared, would have +terrible consequences, would cost millions of dear +lives, would cripple many more millions for the +rest of their earthly days, would cost innumerable +millions—even billions—of hard earned money, +would destroy an immense amount of accumulated +wealth, would delay for years the onward march of +Humanity towards more and more prosperous +destinies, was not only long foreseen before it +broke out, but was positively known to be pregnant +with all such disasters.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_360" id="Page_360">[360]</a></span></p> + +<p>But what was not foreseen, not known, nor +imagined as at all possible, after nearly twenty +centuries of Christianity, was that, war being on, +Germany, the Power responsible for it, guilty of +the crime of having let loose the frightful hurricane, +would multiply the horrors inseparable from +military operations, with unconceivable barbarous +acts condemned by all international, moral and +Divine laws.</p> + +<p>It was not foreseen, nor supposed possible, +that heroism would be challenged by murder, that +the glorious defenders of their country's rights +would have to fight against sanguinary savages +obeying the barbarian orders of a modern Attila.</p> + +<p>It was not foreseen that hundreds of children, +women, old men, wounded soldiers, would be assassinated +on the open sea and sent to their eternal +watery graves.</p> + +<p>So far as the horrors of regular warfare were +concerned, they were, as I have just said, very well +known. And was it not on account of this knowledge +that Great Britain and France had exhausted +all their efforts in favour of the maintenance of +peace?</p> + +<p>Was it not out of this knowledge that England +had, for more than twenty years, implored the +Berlin Government to agree at least to partial +disarmament, to discontinue, or, at the least, to +reduce war ship building operations?</p> + +<p>When Austria, bowing herself down to the +ground under the German tyrannical lash, unjustly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_361" id="Page_361">[361]</a></span> +and cruelly declared war against weak +Servia, she knew what the horrors of the conflict +could not fail to be. How is it that at that +time she was not moved by the sympathetic +feelings expressed in her recent appeal for peace +negotiations?</p> + +<p>How is it that Austria, and her inspiring +angel, Germany, are getting so nervous about the +misfortunes of war, just at the time when they +are forced to admit that they are utterly unable +to realize the aims for which they brought on the +frightful struggle?</p> + +<p>How is it that those who could order with +clear conscience and fiendish delight the violation +of Belgium guaranteed neutrality, the sinking of +the Lusitania and so many other ships carrying +non-combatants, children, women and old men, the +murder of so many innocent victims, the Belgian +deportations, the destruction of the monuments of +art—the work of human genius—are suddenly +moved to pity just as they see the hand writing on +the wall warning them that their days of foul +enjoyments are at end?</p> + +<p>How is it that the voice who dictated the following +sentence was not silenced and choked by +the abominable lie it contains? How is it that the +hand that wrote it was not instantly dried up at +the impudent falsehood it expresses?</p> + +<p>Austria's official communication says in +part:—</p> + +<p>"<i>The Central Powers leave it in no doubt that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_362" id="Page_362">[362]</a></span> +they are only waging a war of defence for the +integrity and the security of their territories.</i>"</p> + +<p>But why is it that the Central Empires +are now only waging a defensive war, if it is not +because after having opened the game with the +certainty of crushing their opponents by the tremendous +power of their formidable military organization, +they are getting beaten and overpowered +by the unrivalled heroism called forth by +their criminal attempt at destroying weak nations +and enslaving Humanity?</p> + +<p>The Austrian and German Governments wilfully +forget that the important point is not to +consider who are the belligerents that are <span class="smcap">NOW</span> +forced by the fortune of arms to wage a defensive +struggle. It is to ascertain who started the conflict +of an <span class="smcap">OFFENSIVE</span> war.</p> + +<p>To that question, the voice of the truly civilized +world has answered with no uncertain sound. +It was given, and ever since most energetically +emphasized, the very day the first Austrian shot +was fired at Belgrade, the first thundering German +gun and the first German soldier ordered to cross +over the Belgian frontier.</p> + +<p>The Austrian tentative peace document pretends +"<i>that all peoples, on whatever side they may +be fighting, long for a speedy end to the bloody +struggle</i>."</p> + +<p>This is so evidently true that the writer of the +communication might very properly have dispensed +with asserting it.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_363" id="Page_363">[363]</a></span></p> + +<p>But have the Austrian and the German Governments +forgotten that the peoples were equally +longing for the maintenance of peace during the +many years of intense war preparation prior to the +outbreak of the hostilities in 1914?</p> + +<p>If they are not yet aware of it, the Central +Empires must be taught that the Allied nations +have another longing than that for peace, to which +they have given precedence and for which they will +continue to fight strenuously until it is fully gratified. +They long for an honourable, a just and +lasting peace. They long to see once more the old +landmarks of Civilization and Political Liberty +emerging safe and radiant from the waves of +Teutonic Barbarism. They long, and most earnestly, +for peace restored under such conditions as +will put an end to extravagant, ruinous and autocratic +militarism, which will henceforth relieve +the peoples from the drastic obligation of maintaining, +at a cost more and more crushing, an ever +increasing military organization for fear of being +suddenly subjugated by an ambitious foe bent on +dominating the world.</p> + +<p>Using the very words of the most admirable +speech addressed by President Wilson to the +United States Congress, on the 11th of February +last, the Allied Nations long for a peace which +will provide "<i>that peoples and provinces are no +longer to be bartered about from sovereignty to +sovereignty as if they were mere chattels and +pawns in a game, even the great game now for ever<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_364" id="Page_364">[364]</a></span> +discredited of the balance of power; but that every +territorial settlement involved in this war must be +made in the interest and for the benefit of the +populations concerned and not as a part of any +mere adjustment or compromise of claims amongst +rival states</i>."</p> + +<p>The Allied peoples are longing for a peace by +which "<i>all well defined national aspirations shall +be accorded the utmost satisfaction that can be accorded +them without introducing new or perpetuating +old elements of discord, and antagonism +that would be likely in time to break the peace of +Europe and consequently of the world</i>."</p> + +<p>The <i>pacifists</i> of the Allied nations who have, +like the Nationalist leader and his henchmen in +the Province of Quebec, clamoured for peace by +compromise, must have had a few hours of delightful +enjoyment after reading Austria's communication. +It is evidently the echo of their oft repeated +views and has been carefully drafted to stir them +to further exertions in favour of a settlement +which will gratify their ill disguised Teutonic +sympathies.</p> + +<p>Austria's document is a plea intended to be +strong for peace by negotiations irrespective of the +war situation and its probable result.</p> + +<p>This is the kind of peace dear to the heart of +the Nationalist leader and his friends. The newspaper +"<i>Le Devoir</i>" is their daily organ in +Montreal. A Sunday paper called "<i>Le Nationaliste</i>" +is the weekly edition of the daily organ.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_365" id="Page_365">[365]</a></span></p> + +<p>By what mysterious inspiration was "<i>Le +Nationaliste</i>" able to forestall the publication of +the Austrian peace document by an article in its +issue of Sunday, the 13th of August, which summarizes +the leading reasons given by the Government +of Vienna to induce the Allied Governments +to agree "<i>to a confidential and unbinding discussion</i>" +of the conditions of peace, "<i>at a neutral +meeting place</i>?"</p> + +<p>Since the official publication of the document, +our Nationalists, who had been subdued by the +Order-in-Council tightening the censure of disloyal +writings and speaking, and reduced to the necessity +of merely whispering their fond hopes of an +early peace which would relieve the Central Empires, +Turkey and Bulgaria from the deserved +chastisement of their crimes, are getting again +more outspoken in the expression of their views +and of their Teutonic proclivities. The street +corner propaganda is being resumed with more +discreet vigour than formerly when loud talk was +considered safe. New efforts, better guarded +against a compromising responsibility, to instil the +virus in the body politic, are tried over again. +They creep in a few newspapers well known for +their hardly disguised hostility to the cause of the +Allies and to the participation of Canada to its +defence. All this under the hypocritical cover of a +longing for the restoration of peace and the cessation +of the sacrifices the country is still making +for the victory for which all loyal British subjects +are praying and doing their best to secure.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_366" id="Page_366">[366]</a></span></p> + +<p>Germany has prudently—cowardly is the more +proper word—remained behind, satisfied, for the +time being, to play the part of prompter to her +vassal, Austria. But, however desirous of remaining +free to repudiate publicly, if considered more +advisable, Austria's move, she could not help +showing her hand. She betrayed herself by the +peace offer she has had the outrageous audacity to +make to Belgium she has barbarously crucified.</p> + +<p>And what are the terms of this astonishing +proposal? I will mention only two of them.</p> + +<p>First: "<span class="smcap">That Belgium shall remain neutral +until the end of the war</span>."</p> + +<p>That Germany should have decided to address +such a demand to Belgium is truly inconceivable. +Has she forgotten the days when Belgium was +neutral, and determined to remain so, under the +joint protection of England, France and Germany, +bound by solemn treaty to uphold Belgian independence? +Does she not realize that if Belgium +has not been neutral up to this day, she has been +the cause of it in tearing to pieces the <i>scrap of +paper</i> which should have been the sacred shield of +the nation she criminally martyred? After having +violated Belgium's frontier, overrun her territory, +destroyed her happy homes, murdered by +thousands her children, her women, her mothers, +her old men, ransomed her to the tune of hundreds +of millions, without granting her liberty, shattered +her monuments of arts, she has the impudence to +ask her to betray those who hastened to her defence,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_367" id="Page_367">[367]</a></span> +and who are pledged to require the restoration of +her complete independence with due reparation as +one of the essential conditions of peace. A more +brazen outrage cannot be imagined. It is on a par +with that addressed to England whose neutrality +Germany wanted to secure at the cost of her honour +in betraying France.</p> + +<p>What was the true object of Germany in making +such a proposition? Was it not to protect +herself against the increasing likelihood that the +Allied army would soon be able to enter on German +soil by passing through Belgium. But in that +event, so much to be hoped for, there would be that +difference that whilst Germany invaded Belgium +in sheer violation of her solemn treaty obligations, +France, England and the United States would +honour themselves in turning the guilty invaders +out of the soil they have sullied by their hideous +presence and their horrible savageness.</p> + +<p>The second German peace proposition to Belgium +reads as follows:—"<i>That Belgium shall use +her good offices to secure the return of the German +colonies</i>."</p> + +<p>And such a request is made by the Power that, +in spite of the treaties it was in honour bound to +respect, ordered the German army to conquer +Belgium in a dastardly rush, in order to reach +France at once and crush her out of the conflict +before she could be helped by Great Britain and +her Colonies! Incredible indeed!</p> + +<p>Germany and Austria knew very well that +their proposals would be indignantly and contemptuously<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_368" id="Page_368">[368]</a></span> +rejected. But they had a twofold +object in making them. First, they wanted to stir +up their own peoples to further efforts in carrying +on the struggle by throwing upon the Allies the +apparent responsibility of refusing even a confidential +and unbinding discussion of the question of +the restoration of peace.</p> + +<p>Second, they were anxious to make a strong +bid for the support of the <i>pacifists</i> of the Allied +countries.</p> + +<p>How much will they succeed in galvanizing +the enthusiasm of their peoples for another grand +effort, remains to be seen.</p> + +<p>So far as their attempt to move our <i>pacifists</i> +to exert themselves in favour of a peace by compromise, +it has already met with a complete failure. +Our Nationalist <i>pacifists</i> are getting so few +and so far between, that they will most likely once +more disappear and give up the street propaganda.</p> + +<p>On completing the reading of the official communication +of Austria, President Wilson at once +gave his reply, authorizing the Secretary of State +to issue the following statement, dated the 16th of +September and published broadcast on the next +day:—</p> + +<p>"<i>I am authorized by the President to state +that the following will be the reply of this Government +to the Austro-Hungarian note proposing an +unofficial conference of belligerents</i>:</p> + +<p>"'<i>The Government of the United States feels +that there is only one reply which it can make to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_369" id="Page_369">[369]</a></span> +the suggestion of the Imperial Austro-Hungarian +Government. It has repeatedly and with entire +candor stated the terms upon which the United +States would consider peace and can and will entertain +no proposal for a conference upon a matter +concerning which it has made its position and +purpose so plain.'</i>"</p> + +<p>On the eleventh day of February, 1918, President +Wilson, instead of addressing as usual a +message to the two Houses, went personally to +meet the Senate and the House of Representatives, +in Congress assembled, and, in a most admirable +speech, replied to the then recent peace utterances +of Count von Hertling, the German Chancellor, +and Count Czernin, the Austro-Hungarian Foreign +Minister, fully explaining the only principles by +which the Government of the United States would +be guided when peace negotiations do take place. +This most important statement is published as an +appendix to this book. It is worthy of the great +statesman who made it, and deserves the most +attentive reading on account of the lofty views and +noble principles it expresses, of the large issues it +involves and of the ardent patriotism it inspires.</p> + +<p>The prime ministers of Great Britain and +France have signified their entire assent to the energetic +stand taken by President Wilson in the +above quoted reply to Austria's peace communication.</p> + +<p>The whole British Empire, France, the United +States and Italy are a unit in refusing to consider +for a moment Austria's cynical peace proposals.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_370" id="Page_370">[370]</a></span></p> + +<p>Belgium, from the cross of martyrdom to +which the Huns' barbarity has nailed her, has +summoned all her wonderful courage, in her long +and cruel agony, to repudiate with scorn the infamous +German proposition to betray those who +are pledged to be her saviours.</p> + +<p>Consequently, the peace offensive, so cleverly +planned by Germany and opened by her contemptible +Austrian satellite, has met with as dismal a +failure as the military offensive launched on the +twenty-first day of March last, with such superior +numerical forces, and unbounded confidence that +this gigantic effort would at last smash the Allies' +resistance.</p> + +<p>Just as the Teutonic hordes are hurled back +by the matchless strategy of the Chief Commander +of the Allied armies and their incomparable heroism, +the Austrian peace offensive communication +is returned to their authors a miserable "<i>scrap of +paper</i>".</p> + +<p>And the grand and noble fight will go on until +Germany is brought to her knees and forced to +recognize that "<span class="smcap">the resources of Civilization are +not yet exhausted</span>."</p> + +<p>The modern Huns are doomed to a very sad +awakening from their dream of universal domination.</p> + +<p>Germany has challenged the world to a deadly +struggle. She must bear the consequences, however +sad they may be. Four years ago, anticipating a +crushing victory, she exulted over the early fall of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_371" id="Page_371">[371]</a></span> +her enemies, madly certain that in a few weeks +they would kneel down crying for mercy. She +trusted her all to the fortunes of war. They will +at last go against her. She would have been +cruelly triumphant. Will she be cowardly in +defeat?</p> + +<p>Austria has blindly served Germany's criminal +ambition. She must abide by the result of her +blindness.</p> + +<p>Both carried away by passion, they forgot that +there would be a terrible reckoning day for their +atrocious crime. It is near at hand, and they cannot +avoid being called to a severe account for their +foul deeds.</p> + +<p>Kaiser Wilhelm II will soon find out that +Divine Justice is very different from what he fondly +believed. He will receive the proper answer to +his blasphemous appeals to the Almighty to bless +with success his guilty ambition to dominate the +world. He will learn that from above the innocent +victims whom he has mercilessly sacrificed to +his lust of autocratic power, have cried for vengeance +and have been heard. He bears the guilt +of blood and sacrilegious war. He shall receive +his deserts in due time.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_372" id="Page_372">[372]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXXVIII.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Necessary Peace Conditions.</span></h3> + + +<p>It can be positively affirmed that, taking no +account whatever of the treasonable views of the +<i>defeatists</i>, and no more of the disloyal opinions of +the <i>pacifists</i>—because they only deserve absolute +contempt and reprobation—the peoples called the +Allies have been long ago, are now, and will remain +to the last, unanimous on the essential <span class="smcap">Peace +Conditions</span> without which all the sacrifices they +have made and are making would be a total +irreparable loss.</p> + +<p>It has been proclaimed with the highest authority, +and universally approved, that henceforth +<span class="smcap">Peace must be just and durable</span>. Such it should +always have been.</p> + +<p>The principle is no doubt very easily enunciated. +It is applauded by all and every where, +even by Germany and Austria. The great, the insuperable, +difficulty is to agree upon <span class="smcap">SUCH CONDITIONS</span> +as will <span class="smcap">PERMANENTLY</span>, and to the <span class="smcap">COMPLETE +SATISFACTION OF ALL CONCERNED</span>, bless the world +with the maintenance of a <span class="smcap">TRULY JUST AND DURABLE +PEACE</span>.</p> + +<p>It is better to admit at once that the very +moment the question is considered, the presently<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_373" id="Page_373">[373]</a></span> +contending belligerents are as far apart as the two +poles of the earthly globe.</p> + +<p>It is extremely easy to prove it.</p> + +<p>No one now ignores—or at least should fail to +realize—what kind of peace would be accepted by +Germany as <span class="smcap">JUST AND DURABLE</span>.</p> + +<p>To be satisfied with a settlement of peace, +Germany would require the sanction by her opponents +of her right to maintain, develop and +strengthen her <span class="smcap">MILITARISM</span> so threatening to the +universe.</p> + +<p>At the time she was exulting over the great +and crushing victory which she was sure to have +within her powerful grasp, in debating with her +vanquished enemies, the conditions of peace, Germany, +elated as she would certainly have been by +her triumph, would have positively claimed the +annexation of Belgium and of all the northern part +of France by right of conquest. She would not +have been less exacting than she was, in 1870, +when in the face of indignant but powerless Europe, +she stripped France of her two fine and +wealthy provinces, Alsace and Lorraine.</p> + +<p>She would have claimed the right to supersede +England as mistress of the seas,—German +supremacy replacing the British and henceforth +ruling the waves.</p> + +<p>She would have claimed the annexation of +Russian Poland, and that of Servia to Austria.</p> + +<p>She would have claimed the recognition of her +imperial paramount power over the Balkans,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_374" id="Page_374">[374]</a></span> +which she would have united under the direct +sway of her ally and vassal, Bulgaria.</p> + +<p>Victorious over all continental Europe and +equally over Great Britain, she would most likely +have claimed the cession to her of the great British +autonomous Colonies for the purpose of pouring +over to Canada, Australia and South Africa +her increasingly overflowing population. And to +better achieve that most coveted result, she would +have destroyed at once the free institutions they +enjoy under the British Crown to replace them by +her autocratic rule.</p> + +<p>In one of his illogical pamphlets, abounding +in extravagant views, the Nationalist leader has +denied with scorn that Germany had ever intended +to acquire Canada by force of arms. He supported +his assertion by the declaration made to the +contrary by a German Minister. But he failed to +explain that this German public man said so only +when the Berlin Government had fully realized +that they could not succeed in breaking asunder +the mighty British Empire. The Teutonic declaration +was hypocritical, intended to deceive, and to +supply our Nationalist "<i>pacifists</i>" with what +would seem a plausible argument to cover their +sympathies for the gentle cause of the tender +hearted Huns. It is very easy to disclaim any +aspiration to possess what one is sure never to get.</p> + +<p>Triumphant Germany would have bargained +very hard to lay her powerful hand on the great +Indian Empire.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_375" id="Page_375">[375]</a></span></p> + +<p>She would have dismembered Russia, as she +has effectively done—at least temporarily—by the +infamous Brest-Litovsk treaty.</p> + +<p>She would have strongly supported Austria +in destroying for ever Italy's legitimate aspirations +to round off her national territory by the +annexation of that part of Austria's possessions +called <i>The Trentino</i>, which is hers by nature.</p> + +<p>Following the precedent she had laid down, in +1870, after her triumph over France, Germany +would undoubtedly have exacted from her fallen +enemies, billions and billions of dollars as +indemnities of war.</p> + +<p>And Germany, with such a peace treaty imposed +to her despairing enemies with her sanguinary +sword at their throat ready to murder them—as +she did at Brest-Litovsk—would have swayed +the world with her <span class="smcap">UNIVERSAL DOMINATION</span>.</p> + +<p>But I hear—I must say without being the +least frightened—the thundering clamour of the +Nationalist leader crying that Germany does not +NOW claim such peace conditions as above +enumerated.</p> + +<p>Very true, and why?</p> + +<p>Only because she is no longer able to exact +and impose them!</p> + +<p>In 1914, Germany being victorious over all +Europe, England included, after a four months +overpowering campaign, as she expected, would +certainly not have been satisfied with less than the +conditions just specified. They were the goal for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_376" id="Page_376">[376]</a></span> +which she had been strenuously preparing for +fifty years, her success, in 1870, being the preliminary +opening of her conquests.</p> + +<p>To bring Germany to renounce—temporarily—to +her fond hopes of domination, it has required +the heroic efforts and the untold sacrifices, in men +and money, which Great Britain, her Colonial Empire, +France, Italy, Belgium, Japan, betrayed Russia, +and, <span class="smcap">LAST BUT NOT LEAST</span>, the United States, +have made during more than the last four years +and which they are pledged to make until a +successful issue.</p> + +<p>The kind of peace as above would have been +what can be very properly called—Germany's +<span class="smcap">"OFFENSIVE PEACE</span>." In Germany's opinion this +would have been the just and durable peace dear to +her so kind heart.</p> + +<p>But having failed to carry the tremendous +victory for which she had so powerfully prepared, +Germany would NOW likely agree to negotiate +what can be as properly called a "<span class="smcap">DEFENSIVE +PEACE</span>."</p> + +<p>By "<span class="smcap">DEFENSIVE PEACE</span>", I mean Germany negotiating +NOW with her opponents with the determination +to repulse, as much as possible, their +just claims, to prevent them to the utmost limit to +reap the legitimate fruits of their admirable +endeavours, to thwart the realization of their +noble aspirations to protect the world hereafter +against her guilty and barbarous militarism.</p> + +<p>Germany—I mean, of course, the Teutonic Imperial<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_377" id="Page_377">[377]</a></span> +Government—has yet given no sign of a +change of mind on the vital points at stake in the +consideration of the restoration of peace. If the +fortune of arms was once more to favour her +armies, her blood stained for Colours, she would, to-morrow, +be as mercilessly exacting as she would +have been, in 1914, had she triumphantly entered +Paris inside of two months after her challenge to +the civilized world.</p> + +<p>Germany is surely not a convert to sound +Christian principles. She will not repent for her +crimes. She does not feel the tortures of remorse +at her foul deeds. She would certainly be a relapser, +in the near future, if the Allies, unwisely +heeding the clamour of the "<i>pacifists</i>", imprudently +gratified her ACTUAL wish for a peace +compromise.</p> + +<p>And before long Humanity would be forced to +go again, in much aggravated conditions, over the +way of the cross she has been threading along for +nearly five years, steeped to the knees in the blood +of millions of her heroic sons, with a reorganized +Germany this time straining all the Huns' accumulated +power to lead Civilization to her Calvary.</p> + +<p>With God's grace, that shall not be. Five +years of martyrdom have deserved and will receive +<span class="smcap">JUSTICE</span>.</p> + +<p>After having explained what Germany, from +her stand-point, considers a <span class="smcap">Just and Durable +Peace</span>, let us see what such a peace means from +the Allies' stand-point.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_378" id="Page_378">[378]</a></span></p> + +<p>Every free man has a right to his own opinion. +However, he must never forget that Liberty +of opinion does not mean—never meant—absence +of knowledge, ignorance of the basic principles of +political society.</p> + +<p>I do not hesitate to expound what the real +conditions of the coming peace MUST BE to make +it JUST AND DURABLE.</p> + +<p>Let the inveterate opponents of Political +Liberty say what they please, it is undeniable that +the present war has rapidly developed into a deadly +conflict between Autocratic Power and Political +Freedom.</p> + +<p>Consequently a peace patched up to uphold +Autocracy and destroy free institutions could not +be <span class="smcap">Just</span> and <span class="smcap">Durable</span>.</p> + +<p>Under the dominating circumstances of the +present struggle, to bring it to a satisfactory conclusion, +peace, to be Just and Durable, must be +restored with all the necessary guarantees that +Political Liberty will hereafter be safe against +the foul attempts of military despotism.</p> + +<p>This <i>sine qua non</i> condition is general in its +nature and equally interests all the contending +Allied nations.</p> + +<p>Let us now consider the peace conditions +which, though of general importance so far as they +are NECESSARY for its permanency, are essential +from the particular stand-point of each one of +the Allies separately.</p> + +<p>I shall begin the review by considering the +particular case of Great Britain.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_379" id="Page_379">[379]</a></span></p> + +<p>To be <span class="smcap">Just</span> and <span class="smcap">Durable</span> for the British Empire, +the future peace treaty must not be so drafted +as to supersede British sea supremacy by that of +Germany.</p> + +<p>The question of what is to be done with the +great German African Colonies, conquered by the +South African Dominion army, is next in importance +to England's sea supremacy, from the British +Empire stand-point.</p> + +<p>Germany, very far from foreseeing what was +to happen, deliberately opened that question when +she precipitated the present conflict by coercing +Austria to crush weak Servia, herself challenging +Russia and France, and thundering at Belgium +in violation of her most sacred treaty obligations.</p> + +<p>Great Britain, as in honour bound, standing +by Belgium, was forced to fight with Germany. +The great autonomous Colonies nobly rallying to +her support, the South African Dominion, Boers +and British admirably united for the purpose, +undertook for her share to conquer the German +African Colonies. She has grandly succeeded.</p> + +<p>If, as we all hope, the Allies are finally victorious, +would it be just to relinquish Great +Britain's right over the German African Colonies, +more especially if the South African Dominion is +strongly opposed—as there is no doubt she will be—to +their retrocession?</p> + +<p>And what about Belgium and France? No +peace treaty could be called <span class="smcap">Just</span> nor could be +<span class="smcap">Durable</span>, which would not completely restore Belgium's<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_380" id="Page_380">[380]</a></span> +independence; which would not oblige +Germany to indemnify Belgium for the damages +wrought upon her, more especially those which +were inflicted to the Belgian weak but heroic +nation out of sheer barbarous destruction.</p> + +<p>To France, the northern part of her presently +occupied territory, together with Alsace and Lorraine, +<span class="smcap">MUST</span> be restored.</p> + +<p>The Germans are loudly crying that in exacting +the restoration to France of the provinces of +Alsace and Lorraine, the Allies would be partly +dismembering the German Empire.</p> + +<p>Quite so, and why not? Does the victim of +the highway man lose the right to claim his property +from the ruffian who has stolen it by brutal +force?</p> + +<p>In 1870, under the circumstances all know, +Prussia imposed upon France the cession of +Alsace and Lorraine, rounding off the territory of +the new German Empire.</p> + +<p>France naturally smarted under the cruelty +of the condition which she could not help accepting. +For many years she cherished the hope that +the lost provinces would ultimately return to the +parental home.</p> + +<p>But it is well known how <span class="smcap">TIME</span> is an efficient +cure of many ills. France's yearning for the restoration +of Alsace and Lorraine had gradually +subsided. The general opinion was spreading that +the Alsace-Lorraine matter was more and more +becoming a finally settled question.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_381" id="Page_381">[381]</a></span></p> + +<p>Before the war, no Power, European or American, +would have countenanced France in any +attempt to break peace to run her chance of reconquering +Alsace and Lorraine. France knew it +perfectly well and at last bowed to her fate.</p> + +<p>Who has reopened the closed question of +Alsace and Lorraine? Is it not Germany herself?</p> + +<p>Great Britain, Russia, the United States and +Italy, who would not have supported France in an +<span class="smcap">OFFENSIVE WAR</span> with the objective of getting back +her lost provinces, are now a most determined +unit in favour of the restoration of Alsace and +Lorraine to France as a result of the <span class="smcap">DEFENSIVE</span> +war Germany forced her to wage.</p> + +<p>That would be <span class="smcap">Justice</span> pure and simple: the +peace treaty <span class="smcap">MUST</span> do it.</p> + +<p>Germany having run the risk of reopening the +Alsace-Lorraine acute question, the Allies <span class="smcap">MUST</span> +close it anew but this time against the Huns.</p> + +<p>Germany <span class="smcap">MUST</span> also pay for the devastation +she has savagely spread in France.</p> + +<p>I stand firm for a final settlement of the +Austro-Italian too long pending question by giving +to Italy the Trentino territory to which she has +an evident national claim supported by the best of +geographical conditions.</p> + +<p>Servia's independence <span class="smcap">MUST</span> be once more +secured, and Poland <span class="smcap">SHOULD</span> be resuscitated.</p> + +<p>The United States part in the war is truly a +grand, a noble one. They have no particular territorial +interest to serve. Their only object is the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_382" id="Page_382">[382]</a></span> +general public good. They will be the benefactors +of Humanity in claiming for their Allies the above +enunciated conditions without which no <span class="smcap">JUST</span> and +<span class="smcap">DURABLE</span> peace can be expected nor obtained.</p> + +<p>It is most important to caution the public +against the insidious clamours of our <i>"pacifists"</i>, +trying again to deceive the people by asserting that +Germany is ready to negotiate for peace on fair +terms.</p> + +<p>The Huns will acquiesce only to such peace +terms as they will be forced to.</p> + +<p>The Allies are better to be guided in consequence +in their unfaltering determination to +realize a <span class="smcap">Just</span> and <span class="smcap">Durable</span> peace by a <span class="smcap">Glorious +Victory</span>.</p> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_383" id="Page_383">[383]</a></span></p> +<h2>CHAPTER XXXIX.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">CONCLUSION.</span></h3> + + +<p>My ardent desire to speak the plain truth and +only the truth, is just as strong to-day as it was +when, in concluding my French work, I summarized +the situation such as it was at the end of the +year 1916, to show the hard duty incumbent on all +the Allies, Canada included. It has been perhaps +still more intensified by the outrageous efforts of +those amongst us whose sole object has been, since +the outbreak of the hostilities, to discourage our +people from the herculean task they had bravely +undertaken.</p> + +<p>Two years have since elapsed—years full of +great events, and of untiring heroism on the part +of the glorious defenders of Justice and Right—and +I do not see the slightest reason to modify the +conclusions I then arrived at as a matter of strict +duty. Unworthy of public confidence is the man +who, pandering to the supposed prejudices of his +countrymen, refrains out of weakness, or of more +guilty considerations, to tell them what they are +bound to do for their own country, for their Empire, +for the world, in the supreme crisis of our +time.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_384" id="Page_384">[384]</a></span></p> + +<p>True every one is longing for the restoration of +peace. But few are those who, even before being +tired of the war, were ready to curb their heads +under the German yoke, are now praying for a +compromise between the Allies and their enemies. +There are some left, it is sad to admit. Everywhere +they are chased by the indignant public +opinion daily growing more determined that millions +of heroes shall not have given their lives in +vain, that millions of others, wounded on the fields +of battles, shall not, until the last of them is gone +for ever, be the betrayed victims of Teutonic +dastardly ambition.</p> + +<p>True, peace is sorely wanted, and would be +welcomed by the thanksgivings to the Almighty of +grateful peoples, who have borne with undaunted +courage such untold and admirable sacrifices to +uphold their Rights and their Honour. But it cannot +be sued for by the nations whom Germany +wanted to enslave by the might of her crushing +militarism operating under the dictates of a new +code of International Law of her own barbarous +creation.</p> + +<p>Thank God, the flowing tide of unlimited +Teutonic ambition let loose over the world, more +than four years ago, has met with inaccessible summits +where love of Justice, respect of Right, devotion<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_385" id="Page_385">[385]</a></span> +to human Civilization, obedience to Christian +Law, heroism of sacrifices, were so deeply entrenched, +that they could not be reached and conquered. +From this commanding altitude, they +not only continue to defy the tyrants bent on dominating +the universe, but they are mightily smashing +their power.</p> + +<p>From the overshadowing point of view which +cannot be forgotten, or wilfully abandoned, +nothing has changed since the German Empire, in +her delirious aspirations, challenged the world to +the almost superhuman conflict by which she felt +certain to succeed in realizing her fond dream of +universal domination.</p> + +<p>At the outbreak of the war, ever since, to-day, +to-morrow, there were, there are and there will be +but three alternatives to the restoration of +peace:—</p> + +<p>1.—A victorious German peace imposed on +beaten and cowed belligerents: the peace of the +"<i>defeatists</i>."</p> + +<p>2.—A peace by compromise, patched up by +disheartened "<i>pacifists</i>," lured by cunningness, +winning where force would have failed to succeed, +to agree to conditions pregnant with all the horrors +of a new and still greater struggle in the +near future.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_386" id="Page_386">[386]</a></span></p> + +<p>3.—A peace the result of the indomitable +courage and perseverance of all the nations who +have joined together to put an end to Germany's +ambition to rule the world, and to destroy the +instrument created for that iniquitous purpose: +Prussian militarism.</p> + +<p>There could be a fourth alternative to peace, +but it would be possible only by a miracle which, +we can grant without hesitation, the world has +perhaps not yet deserved.</p> + +<p>It would be peace restored by the sudden conversion +of Germany to the practice of sound +Christian principles, acknowledging how guilty +she has been, repenting for her crimes, agreeing +to atone for them as much as possible, and taking +the unconditional pledge to henceforth behave like +a civilized nation.</p> + +<p>All must admit that there is not the slightest +hope of such a move from a nation whose autocratic +Kaiser, answering, in February last, an address +presented to him by the burgomaster of +Hamburg, thundered out, in his usual blasting +manner, that the neighbouring peoples, to enjoy +the sweetness of Germany's friendship, "<span class="smcap">must +first recognize the victory of German arms</span>."</p> + +<p>As an inducement to the Allies to bow to his +wishes, he pointed to Germany's achievement in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_387" id="Page_387">[387]</a></span> +Russia, where a beaten enemy, "<i>perceiving no +reason for fighting longer</i>," clasped hands with the +generous Huns. The world has since learned with +appalling horror with what tender mercy the barbarous +Teutons reciprocated the grasping of hands +of defeated Russia, tendered to them by the +"bolshevikis" traitors.</p> + +<p>The Allies had then to select one of the three +above mentioned alternatives.</p> + +<p>They have made their choice and they will +stick close to it until it is achieved by the victory +of their arms.</p> + +<p>Knowing as they do that the future of their +peoples, and that of the whole world, are at stake, +they will not waver in their heroic determination +to free Humanity from Germany's cruel yoke.</p> + +<p>Viewed from the commanding height it requires +to be worthily appreciated, the joint military +effort of the Allies offers a truly grand spectacle, +daily enlarging and getting more gloriously +magnificent.</p> + +<p>All the Allies—every one of them—are doing +their duty and their respective share in the great +crisis they are pledged to bring to a triumphant +conclusion.</p> + +<p>Belgium and Servia were the first to be martyred, +but the hour of their resurrection is getting +nearer every day.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_388" id="Page_388">[388]</a></span></p> + +<p>France, the British Empire, the United States, +Italy, have done and are doing wonders. There +can, there must be no question of appraising their +respective merit with the intention of giving more +credit either to the one or to the other. With the +greatest possible sincerity, I affirm my humble, but +positive, opinion that each one of the Allies has +done and is doing, with overflowing measure, all +that courage could and can earnestly perform, all +that patriotism and the noblest national virtues +can inspire.</p> + +<p>France has been heroic to the highest limit.</p> + +<p>The British Empire—Great Britain and her +Colonies—has been grand in her unswerving determination +to fight to a finish.</p> + +<p>The great American Republic is putting forth +a wonderful exhibition of pluck, of strength, of +boldness, of inexhaustible resources.</p> + +<p>Italy has stood nobly with her new friends +ever since she broke away from the Triple Alliance, +to escape the dishonour of remaining on good +terms with the Central Empires in the shameful +depth of their ignominious course. She has bravely +gone through days of disaster which she has +heroically redeemed.</p> + +<p>All the Allies, bound together by the most +admirable unity of purpose, only rivalling in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_389" id="Page_389">[389]</a></span> +might of their respective patriotic effort, having +nobly <i>"chosen their course upon principle,"</i> can +never turn back. They must move steadily forward +until victorious. They are indomitable in their +decision not to live, under any circumstances, "<i>in +a world governed by intrigue and force</i>."</p> + + +<p>Echoing the wise and inspiring words addressed +by President Wilson to Congress, on the +eleventh of February last, we can affirm that the +"<i>desire of enlightened men everywhere is for a new +international order under which reason, justice +and the common interests of mankind shall prevail. +Without that new order the world will be +without peace, and human life will lack tolerable +conditions of existence and development</i>."</p> + +<p>A most encouraging achievement was realized, +a few months ago, emphasizing to the utmost the +unity of purpose of the Allies. Every one of them +have millions of men under arms and at the front. +It is easily conceived how tremendous is the task +of properly directing the military operations of +such immense armies, unprecedented in the whole +human history. Most patriotically putting aside +all national susceptibilities, the statesmen governing +the Allied nations acknowledged the necessity +of supporting unity of purpose by unity of military +command. Their decision was heartily approved +and applauded by all and every where.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_390" id="Page_390">[390]</a></span></p> + +<p>It is important to note the great difference +between the standing of the two groups of belligerents +with regard to the leadership of the +armies. Whilst the Powers dominated by Germany, +and fighting with her, are coerced to endure +the Teutonic military supremacy of command, +those warring on the side of France have all most +cordially agreed to the appointment of a Commander-in-Chief +out of the profound conviction +that unity of command was more and more becoming +a necessity for the successful prosecution of +the war.</p> + +<p>Since this most urgent decision has been taken, +events have surely proved its wisdom and usefulness. +Evidently, the same as unity of purpose, to +bear all its fruits, must be wrought out by statesmanship +of a high order, unity of military command, +to produce its natural advantages, must be +exercised with superiority of leadership.</p> + +<p>Great statesmen, in a free country, are successful +in the management of State affairs, just as +much as they inspire an increasing confidence in +their political genius, developed by a wide experience, +honesty of purpose, a constant patriotic +devotion to the public weal.</p> + +<p>Great military leaders can do wonders when +their achievements are such as to create unbounded<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_391" id="Page_391">[391]</a></span> +reliance on their ability. Superiority of command, +proved by victories won in very difficult +circumstances, is always sure to be rewarded by +an enlightened enthusiasm permeating the whole +rank and file of an army, and trebling the strength +and heroism of every combatant.</p> + +<p>Added to the widespread renewal of confidence +produced by the timely decision of the Allies to +rely on unity of military command, is the reassuring +evidence that the Commander-in-Chief to whom +has been imposed the grand task of leading the +unified armies to a final and glorious triumph, is +trusted by all, soldiers and others alike.</p> + +<p>The cause for which the Allied nations are +fighting with so much tenacity and courage being +that of the salvation of Civilization, threatened by +a wave of barbarism equal at least to, if not surpassing, +any to which Humanity has so far survived, +all must admire the wonderful spectacle +offered by those millions and millions of men, +under arms, from so many different countries, +united, under one command, into a military organization +which can most properly be called the +<span class="smcap">grand army of Human Freedom</span>.</p> + +<p>It has been said by one who has presided over +the destinies of the American Republic, as the chief +of State, that peace must be dictated from Berlin.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_392" id="Page_392">[392]</a></span> +Can we really hope to behold the dawn of such a +glorious day? It is hardly to be supposed that +Germany would wait this last extremity to realize +that she must abandon for ever her dream of +universal domination, relieve the world from the +enervating menace of her military terrorism, and +redeem her past diabolical course by the repentant +determination to join with her former enemies to +deserve for Mankind long years of perpetual peace +with all the Providential blessings of order, +freedom, truly intellectual, moral and material +progress.</p> + +<p>When the Kaiser ordered his hordes to violate +Belgium's territory, to overrun France in order to +crush her out of existence as a military and political +Power, preparatory to their triumphant march +to St. Petersburg, in his wild ambition, which he +made blasphemous by pretending that it was +divinely inspired, he felt sure that his really wonderful +army, which he believed was, and would +remain, matchless, would in a few weeks enter +Paris.</p> + +<p>What a reverse of fortune, what a downfall +from extravagant expectations, would be a return +of the tide which, after flowing to the very gates +of Paris, spreading devastation and crimes all over +the fair lands it submerged, would ebb, broken and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_393" id="Page_393">[393]</a></span> +powerless, to Berlin, bringing the haughty tyrant +to his knees before his victors!</p> + +<p>If such a day of deliverance is Providentially +granted the world, having deserved it by an indomitable +courage in resisting oppression, history +would again repeat itself but with a different +result. The French <span class="smcap">"TRICOLORE"</span> would once more +enter proud Berlin, but this time it would not be +alone to be hoisted over the conquered capital of +the modern Huns, scarcely less savage than their +forefathers. It would be entwined with the <span class="smcap">"Union +Jack"</span> of Great Britain and Ireland, the <span class="smcap">"Stars +And Stripes"</span> of the United States, the Colours +of Italy, and, I add with an inexpressible +feeling of loyal and national pride, with the +Dominion Colours so brilliantly glorified by the +heroism of our Canadian soldiers who have proved +themselves the equals of the bravest through the +protracted but ever glorious campaign, unfolded +with those of Australia and South Africa into the +glorious flag of the British Empire.</p> + +<p>When after the glorious battle of Iena, the +great Napoleon, who could have ruined for ever +the rising Prussian monarchy, entered Berlin at +the head of his victorious legions, the new Cæsar, +then already the victim of his unlimited ambition, +represented, though issued from a powerful popular +movement, triumphant absolutism.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_394" id="Page_394">[394]</a></span></p> + +<p>In our days, on entering Berlin, as the final +act of this wonderful drama, the entwined Colours +of the Allies would symbolize Human Freedom, +delivering Germany herself and the whole world +from autocratic rule.</p> + +<p>Such a memorable event taking place, and +rank with the most remarkable in the world's +history, the great satisfaction of all those who +would have contributed to its achievement, would +be that the joint Colours of the Allies would not be +raised over Germany's capital to crush the defeated +nation under despotic cæsarism, but to deliver +her from autocratic tyrannical rule. Waving +with dignity over the great Empire they would +have freed from the thraldom of absolutist militarism, +they could be welcomed as the promise of +the renewal, for her as well as for her victorious +rivals, of the reign of Justice, of Christian precepts, +of Right, Order and Peace, of honest and +productive Labour, of science applied to works +creative of human happiness instead of diverting +the marvellous resources of the great modern discoveries +to criminal uses for the calamitous misfortune +of the peoples.</p> + +<p>I will close this work with the expression of +two of the wishes I have most at heart, cherishing +the confident hope that they will be realized.</p> + +<p>England, France and the United States,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_395" id="Page_395">[395]</a></span> +fighting as they do for the triumph of such a sacred +cause, should emerge indissolubly united from the +great struggle they have pledged themselves to +carry to a successful issue. I cannot conceive that +so many millions of their heroic defenders will +have given their lives only for a temporary +achievement, soon to be forgotten. They will be +gone for ever. Their sacrifices will be eternal. +They must bear permanent fruits. United in death, +buried together in the soil of France flooded with +their blood, from their glorious graves they will +implore their surviving countrymen to remain +shoulder to shoulder in peace as they are in war. +Their holocaust should be the holy seed from +which loyal amity ought to grow ever stronger +between the future generations of their countrymen +who could not testify in a more eloquent and +noble way their everlasting gratitude for the +glorious heritage of permanent freedom they will +have derived from their heroism.</p> + +<p>A most enthusiastic daily witness of the immortal +deeds of the millions of our brothers, sons +and friends, fighting with such splendid courage +in the land of my forefathers for our common +cause, how often have I, for the last four years, +ardently vowed to God from the very bottom of +my heart, deeply moved by the reports of their +noble achievements, that those who will rest for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_396" id="Page_396">[396]</a></span> +ever in the ground over which they fell heroically, +may enjoy from above the inspiring spectacle of +the union for the permanent triumph of Liberty +and Christian Civilization, of the great nations +for whose grand future they gave their lives!</p> + +<p>I also most earnestly hope that the more fortunate +of our defenders who will return either safe +from the fields of battle, or proudly bearing the +glorious wounds which will have crippled their +bodies, but not their hearts, will enjoy from the +sanctuary of their homes, made comfortable by +their grateful compatriots, the profound satisfaction +to see the holy union cemented on the thundering +firing line perpetuated for the lasting prosperity +and happiness of Mankind.</p> + +<p>The last shadow of the recollections of the +feuds of past ages between England and France +should be forever sunk in patriotic oblivion, buried +deep beneath the glory both valorous nations will +have jointly reaped in their mighty efforts to rescue +the world from the frightful wave of barbarism +which they will have forced to recede.</p> + +<p>All the well wishers of peaceful and happy +days for future generations are very much gratified +at knowing that in joining with the Allies in the +mighty struggle they were carrying with such undaunted +courage, the great American Republic +was also inspired by a feeling of gratitude for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_397" id="Page_397">[397]</a></span> +France in remembrance of what she has done to +help her to achieve her independence. Let us behold +anew the inscrutable designs of Providence. +Nearly a century and a half has elapsed since +France, England and her American Colonies +seemed to be for all times irreconcilable opponents. +What a change in Destiny! Years have rolled by. +New and unforeseen conditions have been developed +the world over. Gradually two great currents +of thoughts and aspirations have been +flowing with increased strength preparing a formidable +clash which was to threaten Civilization with +utter destruction.</p> + +<p>Autocratic ambition was for many long years +challenging Political Liberty to a deadly conflict. +At last from the cloudy sky came the flash of +lightning, and the thunderbolt was on the earth +shaking it to its depth by the tremendous shock.</p> + +<p>Germany, having fired the wonderful autocratic +shot, fully expected that her rivals would be +thunderstruck beyond possibility of resurrection. +But to her great dismay, the friends of Political +Liberty the world over rallied as one man to its +defence. And Germany trembled at seeing England +burying for ever all ill-feelings against +France, her ancient foe, rushing to her support +with millions of her brave sons, after having drawn<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_398" id="Page_398">[398]</a></span> +around her ally the protecting chain of her matchless +fleet.</p> + +<p>Another very discomforting surprise was in +store for the cruel Huns. The American Republic, +grateful to France for past services, was also +moved by renovated feelings of affection for the +mother-country from whom she had parted without +disowning her. Determined to be at the forefront +of the battle for the triumph of human Freedom—after +unsuccessfully exhausting every means +of bringing Germany to her senses—she clasped +hands with England and France and valiantly +rallied to their sides to share the merit and the +glory of saving Political Liberty from the terrible +Teutonic onslaught.</p> + +<p>In my humble but sincere and profound opinion, +the present spectacle offered to the world's +admiration by the sacred and mighty union of the +British Empire, France and the United States, +every patriotic home of theirs thrilling with undiminished +enthusiasm for the success of their +heroic efforts, is a truly grand one inspiring unbounded +faith in the future of Humanity. Let no +one forget for a moment that the present war, +certainly <span class="smcap">NATIONAL</span> so far as the existence of each +one of the Allied States is concerned, is, above all +preeminently a world's conflict which favourable<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_399" id="Page_399">[399]</a></span> +issue deeply concerns the destinies of all the +peoples of the earthly globe.</p> + +<p>The whole question is whether autocratic +tyranny will henceforth rule the world, or if +Humanity will yet enjoy the blessings of Liberty, +of free institutions!</p> + +<p>In all hearts must abide the supreme desire +that when peace is restored with all and the only +conditions to which they can agree, the British +Empire, France and the American Republic will +forever remain united to promote the prosperity +and the welfare of all the nations of the earth, +large, middle-sized or small. The duty of those of +Imperialist proportions will be as hitherto performed +by England and the United States in their +democratic way, to protect the independence of the +small States, never aspiring to any territorial acquisitions +but those accruing to them with the full +and free consent of the new populations asking +the protection of their ægis and the advantages +of their union.</p> + +<p>When I consider the grand and magnificent +part the three above named leading nations can +play for the happy future of Humanity, by working +hand in hand, and shoulder to shoulder, for general +peace, order and prosperity, my heart is full +with the ardent desire to witness them accepting +that glorious task with the stern determination to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_400" id="Page_400">[400]</a></span> +accomplish it to its better end. In spite of the +vicissitudes and the failings of their past, they +have done a great deal for the general good. They +can do still more in the future. Like everyman +bearing with fortitude the trials of life with the +worthy design of profiting by the experience thus +acquired to elevate himself to a higher conception +of his duty, the British Empire, France and the +United States will undoubtedly emerge from behind +the dark clouds of the present days with +aspirations ennobled by the sacrifices they are +making, purified by the sufferings and the holocaust +of so many of their own, with a stronger will +to help working out the world's destiny by maintaining +permanent peace and good-will amongst +men. If they pursue that dignified course of high +ideals they will fully deserve the admiration and +the gratitude of all those who will benefit by their +examples, and reap the abundant fruits of their +devoted and enlightened leadership.</p> + +<p>It is one of the blessings of true Political +Liberty, when duly understood and intelligently +practised, to produce a class of politicians and +statesmen of wide experience, of commanding +character, of high culture, of great attainments, +with a superior training in the management of +public affairs, who are readily acknowledged as +national leaders by the people who confidently<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_401" id="Page_401">[401]</a></span> +trust them, reserving, of course, their constitutional +right to call new men to office whenever +they consider in the public interest to do so. Those +trusted leaders do not claim, as the German autocratic +Kaiser, the power, by Divine Right, to do +anything they please, asserting that in every +imaginable case they do the will of the Almighty.</p> + +<p>When charged with the Government of their +country, they understand very well that their duty +is to manage the national affairs under their +responsibility, first, to the Divine Ruler, as any +other man in any other calling; secondly, to those +who, having required their services, have the constitutional +right to call them to account for their +stewardship.</p> + +<p>Just as confidence is the basis of sound national +credit, trust, on the part of the people, and responsibility, +on that of the national leaders, are +the two cornerstones of free institutions.</p> + +<p>Great Britain,—and her great autonomous +Colonies also—for many long years past, have +been most fortunate in the choice of the national +leaders whom they have successively entrusted +with the affairs of State.</p> + +<p>In that momentous occurrence, more than four +years ago, when the whole question whether Great +Britain would go to war, or not, was laid before +the Imperial Parliament supported by the strongest<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_402" id="Page_402">[402]</a></span> +possible reasons in favour of the decision to +accept the challenge of Germany, and fight with the +firm determination not to sheathe the sword before +victory was won, no British public man would +have dared, like the German Emperor, to claim, by +Divine Authority, the right to violate the solemn +treaties the provisions of which his country was +in honour and duty bound to carry out to the very +letter.</p> + +<p>The commanding parts national leaders play +in a free country, in consequence of the public confidence +they inspire and enjoy, can have their +counterparts in the great society of nations.</p> + +<p>Whatever shall be the final settlement of all +the difficult matters brought up for solution by +the war, it is certain that the management of the +world's affairs will be well served by the legitimate +influence of great nations whose leadership +will be beneficial just in proportion as it is itself +directed by the true principles of political Freedom, +and an uncompromising respect of the rights +of weaker nations always entitled to the fairest +dealings on the part of their stronger associates +in the great commonwealth of Sovereign States.</p> + +<p>There cannot be the slightest doubt that the +British Empire, France and the United States, +until Providentially ordered otherwise, will hereafter +be the three leading nations of the world.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_403" id="Page_403">[403]</a></span> +Their union maintained sacred in peace, as it is +in war, will be the safest guarantee that the days +of autocratic domination have ended. Henceforth +the tide of political Freedom will flow with increased +rapidity and strength. The only danger +ahead, against which it is always wise to provide +with due care and foresight, is that which would +be the result of abuse and wild expectations always +sure to react in favour of absolutist principles. +Political Liberty and Order, Governmental Authority +and Freedom, both well directed, must +work hand in hand for the national welfare.</p> + +<p>The British Empire, France and the American +Republic are free countries. More and better than +any others they should and must, by example and +friendly advice, lead the peoples in the successful +practice of self-government.</p> + +<p>Considering more especially the part the +British Empire will be called upon to play in the +reorganized world, freed from autocratic terrorism, +we must not lose sight of the much larger +place England's great autonomous Colonies will +occupy in the broadened English Commonwealth. +We, Canadians, together with our brethren from +Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, will +have done our glorious share to win the war. We +shall have to perform with equal devotion the new +duty of sharing the British Empire's task in gradually<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_404" id="Page_404">[404]</a></span> +elevating the nations to an enlightened +practice of Political Liberty.</p> + +<p>Evidently to do so with the success this noble +cause will deserve, we must first strive to utilize +our admirable free institutions to the best advantage, +for ourselves, for our own future, and for +the grand destinies of our Empire.</p> + +<p>As an instrument of good government our +constitutional charter is almost perfect, as much +so as any thing worldly can be. Let us never forget +that the best weapon for self-protection may +become useless, or even dangerous for us, if not +handled with the required intelligence, justice and +skill. We would lose all claims to contribute +guiding others in the enjoyment of free institutions +if we, ourselves, were mistaken in the proper +working of our own constitution from a misconception +of its literal wording or of its largeness +of spirit. We must never challenge the truth that +"spirit giveth life."</p> + +<p>More than ever the supreme difficulties of +governing numerous racial groups, issued from +ancient stocks so long divided by endless feuds,—the +result of the many sudden changes of territorial +limits to be wrought by the restoration of +peace—will be very hard to settle satisfactorily. +The task will require the constant effort of statesmanship +of a high order.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_405" id="Page_405">[405]</a></span></p> + +<p>Many of those who will hereafter be trained +to self-government will look to us for their guidance. +We must give them the inspiring example +of fair play, of justice for all, of unity of purpose +and aspirations in the diversity of ethnical +offsprings.</p> + +<p>Need I say that the most urgent duty of all +fair minded Canadians is, and will ever be, to +heartily join together, to bless our dear country +with concord, good feeling, harmony and kindly +dispositions to grant an overflowing measure of +justice to all our countrymen of all origins and +creeds.</p> + +<p>Writing this book with the express purpose +of explaining and strongly disapproving the deplorable +efforts of a few to deter my French +Canadian compatriots from doing their bounden +duty through the dire crisis we are all undergoing, +I will close these pages by calling anew upon my +English speaking countrymen not to judge them +by the sayings and deeds of persons who can at +times somewhat stir up dangerous prejudices, but +who are utterly incompetent to lead them as they +should and deserve to be. Silenced at last by a +patriotic measure to censure any disloyal expression +of sentiments, matters have easily resumed +their regular and honourable course. All loyal +citizens, throughout the length and breadth of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_406" id="Page_406">[406]</a></span> +land, have, I am sure, much rejoiced at the loyalty +with which the French Canadians, of all classes, +religious, social, commercial, industrial, financial, +agricultural, have united to obey a statute of military +service to which many of them did not agree, +as long as they had the constitutional right to differ +from the opinion of the large majority of our +people, but to the successful operation of which +they rallied the moment it was the law of the land. +The worthy leaders of our Church strongly +recommended obedience to the decision of the +constituted authority, firmly condemned any +guilty attempt at disturbing public order, and +ordered all the members of their flocks to fervously +pray the Almighty for PEACE WITH VICTORY +FOR THE ALLIES.</p> + +<p>Our "pacifists at all hazards" once more +silenced, this time by the very religious leaders +under whose ægis they had shamefully tried to +shield themselves, the patriotic impulse was moved +to most commendable action. Without waiting for +the call of the law, hundreds of young men from +the better classes, from the universities and other +educational institutions, well educated, voluntarily +enlisted and rallied to the Colours. At least as +much as in the other provinces, the class of our +young manhood called by law heartily responded, +all the real leaders of public opinion uniting to +give the only advice loyal men could express.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_407" id="Page_407">[407]</a></span></p> + +<p>For one, I was most happy to ascertain how +favourably western public feeling was impressed +by the new turn of thoughts and events in the +Province of Quebec. The reaction of sentiments +operating both ways,—in Ontario, the western +Provinces and Quebec—augurs well for the final +abatement of the excitement which for a time +menaced our fair Dominion with regrettable racial +strifes so much to be deprecated.</p> + +<p>It can be positively affirmed that the whole +people of Canada, east to west, north to south, +are now more than ever a unit in their patriotic +determination to fight the war to its final victorious +issue. To this end the two millions of French +British subjects in Canada, in perfect communion +of thoughts and aspirations with the two millions +of the neighbouring Republic's subjects of French +Canadian origin, are loyally doing, and will continue +to do, their share. Their representatives at +the front are gloriously fighting the common +enemy. Their valour and their achievements during +the Allies' offensive so masterly planned and +carried out by the Commander-in-Chief, Foch, +have been worthy of their victories at Ypres, Vimy, +Courcelette, Passchandaele. Many have, during +the last three months, given their lives for the +cause they defend. Many more have been wounded +and are anxiously waiting their cure, when possible,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_408" id="Page_408">[408]</a></span> +to return to the field of honour. Daily reports +from the front tell of their enthusiasm, of their +bravery, of their heroism!</p> + +<p>The French Canadians—I have no hesitation +whatever in vouching for it—will continue to bear +stoically with the sacrifices of so many kinds the +conflict imposes upon them. Though smarting, +as all others, under the burden, yet they cheerfully +pay the heavy taxes required from the country to +meet our national obligations the outcome of the +war.</p> + +<p>So all is for the best under the strenuous +present conditions of our national existence.</p> + +<p>In closing, I pray leave to reiterate, from +the Introduction to this work, the following +lines expressing my most sincere and profound +conviction:—</p> + +<p>I hope,—and most ardently wish—that all my +readers will agree with me that next to the necessity +of winning the war—and may I say, even as +of almost equal importance for the future grandeur +of our beloved country—range that of promoting +by all lawful means harmony and good will +amongst all our countrymen, whatever may be +their racial origin, their religious faith, their +particular aspirations not conflicting with their +devotion to Canada as a whole, nor with their loyalty +to the British Empire, whose grandeur and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_409" id="Page_409">[409]</a></span> +prestige they want to firmly help to uphold with +the inspiring confidence that more and more they +will be the unconquerable bulwark of Freedom, +Justice, Civilization and Right.</p> + +<p>May I be allowed to conclude by saying that +my most earnest desire is to do all in my power, in +the rank and file of the great army of free men, to +reach the goal which ought to be the most persevering +and patriotic ambition of loyal Canadians +of all origins and creeds.</p> + +<p>And I repeat, wishing my words to be reechoed +throughout the length and breadth of the land I so +heartily cherish:—I have always been, I am and +will ever be, to my last breath, true to my oath of +allegiance to my Sovereign and to my country.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_410" id="Page_410">[410]</a></span></p> + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_411" id="Page_411">[411]</a></span></p> +<h2>APPENDIX—A.</h2> + +<h3>PRESIDENT WILSON'S SPEECH</h3> + +<div class="center"><span class="smcap">To The United States Congress—11th Day of +February, 1918.</span></div> + + +<p>On the above mentioned date, Mr. Wilson, the +President of the great American Republic, delivered +the following speech to the Congress, in +Washington. This noble and statesmanlike utterance +met with the unanimous and enthusiastic +approval of the members of both Houses, and was +highly applauded, not only in the United States, +but over all the truly civilized world. It reads +thus:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"On the eighth of January, I had the honor of +addressing you on the objects of the war as our people +conceive them. The Prime Minister of Great Britain +had spoken in similar terms on the fifth of January. To +these addresses the German Chancellor replied on the +24th and Count Czernin for Austria on the same day. +It is gratifying to have our desire so promptly realized +that all exchanges of view on this great matter should be +made in the hearing of all the world.</p> + +<p>"Count Czernin's reply, which is directed chiefly to +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_412" id="Page_412">[412]</a></span>my own address, on the eighth of January, is uttered in +a very friendly tone.</p> + +<p>"He finds in my statement a sufficiently encouraging +approach to the views of his own government to justify +him in believing that it furnishes a basis for a more detailed +discussion of purposes by the two governments. +He is represented to have intimated that the views he +was expressing had been communicated to me beforehand +and that I was aware of them at the time he was uttering +them; but in this I am sure he was misunderstood. I had +received no intimation of what he intended to say. There +was, of course, no reason why he should communicate +privately with me. I am quite content to be one of his +public audiences.</p> + +<p>"Count von Hertling's reply is, I may say, very +vague and very confusing. It is full of equivocal phrases +and leads, it is not clear where. But it is certainly in a +very different tone from that of Count Czernin and apparently +of an opposite purpose. It confirms, I am sorry +to say, rather than removes, the unfortunate impression +made by what we had learned of the conferences at Brest-Litovsk. +His discussion and acceptance of our general +principles leads him to no practical conclusions. He refuses +to apply them to the substantiate items which must +constitute the body of any final settlement. He is jealous +of international action and of international council. He +accepts, he says, the principle of public diplomacy, but he +appears to insist that it be confined at any rate in this +case, to generalities and that the several particular questions +of territory and sovereignty, the several questions +upon whose settlement must depend the acceptance of +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_413" id="Page_413">[413]</a></span>peace by the twenty-three states now engaged in the war, +must be discussed and settled, not in general council but +severally by the nations most immediately concerned by +interest of neighbourhood. He agrees that the seas should +be free, but looks askance at any limitation to that freedom +by international action in the interest of the common +order. He would, without reserve, be glad to see economic +barriers removed between nation and nation, for +that could in no way impede the ambitions of the military +party with whom he seems constrained to keep on terms. +Neither does he raise objection to a limitation of armaments. +That matter will be settled of itself, he thinks, +by the economic conditions which must follow the war. +But the German colonies, he demands, must be returned +without debate. He will discuss with no one but the representatives +of Russia what disposition shall be made of +the peoples and the lands of the Baltic provinces; with no +one but the Government of France the "conditions" under +which French territory shall be evacuated and only with +Austria what shall be done with Poland. In the determination +of all questions affecting the Balkan states he defers, +as I understand him, to Austria and Turkey and with regard +to the agreements to be entered into concerning the +non-Turkish peoples of the present Ottoman Empire, to +the Turkish authorities themselves. After a settlement all +around effected in this fashion, by individual barter and +concession, he would have no objection, if I correctly interpret +his statement, to a league of nations which would +undertake to hold the balance of power steady against +external disturbance.</p> + +<p>"It must be evident to everyone who understands +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_414" id="Page_414">[414]</a></span>what this war has wrought in the opinion and temper of +the world that no general peace, no peace worth the infinite +sacrifices of these years of tragical suffering, can +possibly be arrived at in any such fashion. The method +the German Chancellor proposes is the method of the +Congress of Vienna. We cannot and will not return to +that. What is at stake now is the peace of the world. +What we are striving for is a new international order +based upon broad and universal principles of right and +justice—no mere peace of shreds and patches. Is it possible +that Count von Hertling does not see that, does not +grasp it, is in fact living in his thought in a world dead +and gone? Has he utterly forgotten the Reichstag resolutions +of the 19th of July, or does he deliberately +ignore them? They spoke of the conditions of a general +peace, not of national aggrandizement or of arrangements +between state and state. The peace of the world +depends upon just settlement of each of the several problems +to which I adverted in my recent address to Congress. +I, of course, do not mean that the peace of the +world depends upon the acceptance of any particular set +of suggestions as to the way in which those problems are +to be dealt with. I mean only that those problems, each +and all, affect the whole world; that unless they are dealt +with in a spirit of unselfish and unbiassed justice, with a +view to the wishes, the natural connections, the racial +aspirations, the security and peace of mind of the peoples +involved, no permanent peace will have been attained. +They cannot be discussed separately or in corners. None +of them constitutes a private or separate interest from +which the opinion of the world may be shut out. Whatever +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_415" id="Page_415">[415]</a></span>affects the peace affects mankind, and nothing +settled by military force, if settled wrong, is settled at all. +It will presently have to be re-opened.</p> + +<p>"Is Count von Hertling not aware that he is speaking +in the court of mankind, that all the awakened nations +of the world now sit in judgment on what every public +man, of whatever nation, may say on the issues of a conflict +which has spread to every region of the world? The +Reichstag resolutions of July 19 themselves frankly accepted +the decisions of that court. There shall be no +annexations, no contributions, no punitive damages. +Peoples are not to be handed about from one sovereignty +to another by an international conference or an understanding +between rivals and antagonists. National aspirations +must be respected; peoples may now be dominated +and governed only by their own consent. "Self-determination," +is not a mere phrase. It is an imperative +principle of action, which statesmen will henceforth +ignore at their peril. We cannot have general peace for +the asking, or by the mere arrangements of a peace conference. +It cannot be pieced together out of individual +understandings between powerful states. All the parties +to this war must join in the settlement of every issue anywhere +involved in it because what we are seeking is a +peace that we can all unite to guarantee and maintain +whether it be right and fair, an act of justice, rather than +a bargain between sovereigns.</p> + +<p>"The United States has no desire to interfere in +European affairs or to act as arbiter in European territorial +disputes. We would disdain to take advantage of +any internal weakness or disorder to impose her own will +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_416" id="Page_416">[416]</a></span>upon another people. She is quite ready to be shown +that the settlements she has suggested are not the best or +the most enduring. They are only her own provisional +sketch of principles, and of the way in which they should +be applied. But she entered this war because she was +made a partner, whether she would or not, in the sufferings +and indignities inflicted by the military masters of +Germany, against the peace and security of mankind; and +the conditions of peace will touch her as nearly as they +will touch any other nation to which is entrusted a leading +part in the maintenance of civilization. She cannot see +her way to peace until the causes of this war are removed, +its renewal rendered, as nearly as may be, impossible.</p> + +<p>"This war had its roots in the disregard of the +rights of small nations and of nationalities which lacked +the union and the force to make good their claim to determine +their own allegiances and their own forms of +political life. Covenants must now be entered into which +will render such things impossible for the future; and +those covenants must be backed by the united force of all +the nations that love justice and are willing to maintain it +at any cost. If territorial settlements and the political +relations of great populations which have not the organized +power to resist are to be determined by the contracts +of the powerful governments which consider themselves +most directly affected, as Count von Hertling proposes, +why may not economic questions also? It has come about +in the altered world in which we now find ourselves that +justice and the rights of peoples affect the whole field of +international dealing as much as access to raw materials +and fair and equal conditions of trade. Count von Hertling +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_417" id="Page_417">[417]</a></span>wants the essential basis of commercial and industrial +life to be safeguarded by common agreement and guarantee, +but he cannot expect that to be conceded him if the +other matters to be determined by the articles of peace +are not handled in the same way as it was in the final +accounting. He cannot ask the benefit of common agreement +in the one field without according it in the other. +I take it for granted that he sees that separate and selfish +compacts with regard to trade and the essential materials +of manufacture would afford no foundation for peace. +Neither, he may rest assured, will separate and selfish +compacts with regard to the provinces and peoples.</p> + +<p>"Count Czernin seems to see the fundamental elements +of peace with clear eyes and does not seek to obscure +them. He sees that an independent Poland, made +up of all the indisputably Polish peoples who lie contiguous +to one another, is a matter of European concern +and must of course be conceded; that Belgium must be +evacuated and restored, no matter what sacrifices and +concessions that may involve; and that national aspirations +must be satisfied, even within his own empire, in the +common interest of Europe and mankind. If he is silent +about questions which touch the interest and purpose of +his Allies more nearly than they touch those of Austria +only, it must, of course, be because he feels constrained, +I suppose, to defer to Germany and Turkey in the circumstances. +Seeing and conceding, as he does, the essential +principles involved and the necessity of candidly +applying them, he naturally feels that Austria can respond +to the purpose of peace as expressed by the United States +with less embarrassment than could Germany. He would +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_418" id="Page_418">[418]</a></span>probably have gone much farther had it not been for +the embarrassments of Austria's alliance and of her +dependence upon Germany.</p> + +<p>"After all the test of whether it is possible for +either Government to go any further in this comparison +of views is simple and obvious. The principles to be +applied are:</p> + +<p>"First, that each part of the final settlement must +be based on the essential justice of the particular case, +and upon such adjustments as are most likely to bring a +peace that will be permanent.</p> + +<p>"Second, that peoples and provinces are not to be +bartered about from sovereignty to sovereignty as if they +were mere chattels and pawns in a game, even the great +game, now for ever discredited, of the balance of power; +but that,</p> + +<p>"Every territorial settlement involved in this war +must be made in the interest and for the benefit of the +populations concerned and not as a part of any mere +adjustment of compromise of claims amongst rival states; +and,</p> + +<p>"Fourth, that all well defined national aspirations +shall be accorded the utmost satisfaction that can be accorded +them without introducing new or perpetuating old +elements of discord, and antagonism that would be likely +in time to break the peace of Europe and consequently +of the world.</p> + +<p>"A general peace entered upon such foundations can +be discussed. Until such a peace can be secured we have +no choice but to go on. So far as we can judge, these +principles that we regard as fundamental are already +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_419" id="Page_419">[419]</a></span>everywhere accepted as imperative except among the +spokesmen of the military and annexationist party in +Germany. If they have anywhere else been rejected, the +objectors have not been sufficiently numerous or influential +to make their voices audible. The tragic circumstance is +that this one party in Germany is apparently willing and +able to send millions of men to their death to prevent +what all the world now sees to be just.</p> + +<p>"I would not be a true spokesman of the people of +the United States if I did not say once more that we entered +this war upon no small occasion, and that we can +never turn back from a course chosen upon principle. +Our resources are in part mobilized now, and we shall +not pause until they are mobilized in their entirety. Our +armies are rapidly going to the fighting front, and will +go more rapidly. Our whole strength will be put into +this state of emancipation—emancipation from the threat +and attempted mastery of selfish groups of autocratic +rulers—whatever the difficulties and present partial delays. +We are indomitable in our power of independent +action, and can in no circumstances consent to live in a +world governed by intrigue and force. We believe that +our own desire for a new international order under which +reason and justice and the common interests of mankind +shall prevail, is the desire of enlightened men everywhere. +Without that new order the world will be without peace, +and human life will lack tolerable conditions of existence +and development. Having set our hand to the task +of achieving it, we shall not turn back.</p> + +<p>"I hope that it is not necessary for me to add that no +word of what I have said is intended as a threat. That +<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_420" id="Page_420">[420]</a></span>is not the temper of our people. I have spoken thus only +that the whole world may know the true spirit of America—that +men everywhere may know that our passion for +justice and for self-government is no mere passion of +words, but a passion which, once set in act, must be satisfied. +The power of the United States is a menace to +no nation or people. It will be never used in aggression +or for the aggrandizement of any selfish interest of our +own. It springs out of freedom and is for the service +of freedom."</p> +</div> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /><p><span class='pagenum'><a name="Page_421" id="Page_421">[421]</a></span></p> +<h2>APPENDIX—B.</h2> + +<h3><span class="smcap">Text of United States Reply to Austria.</span></h3> + + +<p>On the 18th of September, 1918, the Secretary +of State made public the official text of the letter +he sent, to Mr. W. A. F. Ekengren, the Swedish +Minister, in charge of Austro-Hungarian affairs, +conveying President Wilson's rejection of the +Austrian peace proposals. It reads as follows:—</p> + +<div class="blockquot"><p>"Sir,—I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt +of your note, dated September 16, communicating to me +a note from the Imperial Government of Austria-Hungary, +containing a proposal to the Government of +all the belligerent States to send delegates to a confidential +and unbinding discussion on the basic principles for the +conclusion of peace. Furthermore, it is proposed that +the delegates would be charged to make known to one +another the conception of their Governments regarding +these principles, and to receive analogous communications, +as well as to request and give frank and candid explanations +on all those points which need to be precisely +defined.</p> + +<p>"In reply, I beg to say that the substance of your +communication has been submitted to the President, who +now directs me to inform you that the Government of +the United States feels that there is only one reply which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_422" id="Page_422">[422]</a></span> +it can make to the suggestion of the Imperial Austro-Hungarian +Government. It has repeatedly, and with +entire candor, stated the terms upon which the United +States would consider peace, and can and will entertain +no proposal for a conference upon the matter concerning +which it has made its position and purpose so plain.</p> + +<p>"Accept, sir, the renewed assurances of my highest +consideration.</p> +</div> + +<div class="right"> +"(Signed), ROBERT LANSING,<br /> +<br /> +"Secretary of State."<br /> +</div> + + + +<hr style="width: 65%;" /> + +<div class="tnote"> +<div class="center">Transcriber's Notes</div> + +<p>Obvious punctuation errors repaired.</p> + +<p>Numerous obvious spelling errors have been corrected.</p> + +<p>Archaic or unusual words and spellings have not been changed: +beneficient, coronated, consolated, conspiration, devotedness, divers, +elogius, enflame, enounced, equilibrist, eulogium, fervously, +injustifiable, irresistable, instil, Magna Charta, planturous, +plebiscit, plebiscitary, preconized, profonated, Roumanian, Servia, +subtilties, tragical, treasonably, troublous, tutorage, unbiassed, +uncontrovertible, unsufficiently, woful.</p> + +<p>Both "bolshevik" and "bolchevik" appear and have not been changed.</p> + +<p>Both "standpoint(s)" and "stand-point(s)" appear and have +not been changed.</p> + +<p>The following inconsistent usages appear and have not been changed: +"Mother Country", "mother country", "mother-country", "Mother Land", +"Mother land", "mother land", "Motherland".</p> + +<p>Page 34: Duplicate word "His" deleted (His Excellency had just).</p> + +<p>Page 96 (and elsewhere): "per cent" changed to "per cent." +for consistency.</p> +</div> + + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of England, Canada and the Great War, by +Louis-Georges Desjardins + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGLAND, CANADA AND THE GREAT WAR *** + +***** This file should be named 37792-h.htm or 37792-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/3/7/7/9/37792/ + +Produced by Moti Ben-Ari and the Online Distributed +Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net. (This file was +produced from images generously made available by The +Internet Archive.) + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +http://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at http://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit http://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + http://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> |