diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 18:55:24 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-14 18:55:24 -0700 |
| commit | 983fc93247fd5273e05c3a4367bb7d0b186a9cda (patch) | |
| tree | 0ad9bb3eb6680e70a4f51c1ce177397782e85e44 /44695-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '44695-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 44695-h/44695-h.htm | 6947 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44695-h/images/cover.jpg | bin | 0 -> 85682 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44695-h/images/icover.jpg | bin | 0 -> 37240 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 44695-h/images/title.jpg | bin | 0 -> 36727 bytes |
4 files changed, 6947 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/44695-h/44695-h.htm b/44695-h/44695-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9884da6 --- /dev/null +++ b/44695-h/44695-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,6947 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> + <head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" /> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> + <title> + The Project Gutenberg eBook of King Robert The Bruce, by A. F. Murison. + </title> + <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" /> + <style type="text/css"> + +body { + margin-left: 40px; + margin-right: 40px; +} + +h1,h2 { + text-align: center; + clear: both; + margin-top: 2.5em; + margin-bottom: 1em; +} + +h1 {line-height: 1;} + +h2.chap {margin-bottom: 0;} +h2+p {margin-top: 1.5em;} +h2 .subhead {display: block; margin-top: 1.75em; margin-bottom: 1em;} + +.transnote h2 { + margin-top: .5em; + margin-bottom: 1em; +} + +.subhead { + text-indent: 0; + text-align: center; + font-size: smaller; +} + +p { + text-indent: 1.75em; + margin-top: .51em; + margin-bottom: .24em; + text-align: justify; +} +.caption p {text-align: center; text-indent: 0;} +p.center {text-indent: 0;} + +.p0 {margin-top: 0em;} +.p2 {margin-top: 2em;} +.p4 {margin-top: 4em;} +.vspace {line-height: 1.5;} + +.in0 {text-indent: 0;} +.in1 {padding-left: 1em;} +.in2 {padding-left: 2em;} + +.small {font-size: 70%;} +.smaller {font-size: 85%;} +.larger {font-size: 125%;} +.large {font-size: 150%;} +.xlarge {font-size: 175%;} +.xxlarge {font-size: 200%;} + +.center {text-align: center;} + +.smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} +.smcap.smaller {font-size: 75%;} + +hr { + width: 33%; + margin-top: 4em; + margin-bottom: 4em; + margin-left: 33%; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; +} + +.tb { + text-align: center; + padding-top: .5em; + padding-bottom: .5em; +} + +table { + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + max-width: 80%; + border-collapse: collapse; +} + +.tdl { + text-align: justify; + vertical-align: top; + padding-right: 1em; + padding-left: 1.5em; + text-indent: -1.5em; +} +.tdc.chap { + text-align: center; + padding-top: 1.5em; + padding-bottom: .5em; + font-size: 110%; +} + +.tdc {text-align: center;} + +.tdr { + text-align: right; + vertical-align: bottom; + padding-left: .3em; + white-space: nowrap; +} + +ul {padding-left: 0;} +li {list-style-type: none; line-height: 1.4;} + +.pagenum { + position: absolute; + right: 4px; + text-indent: 0em; + text-align: right; + font-size: 70%; + font-weight: normal; + font-variant: normal; + font-style: normal; + letter-spacing: normal; + line-height: normal; + color: #acacac; + border: 1px solid #acacac; + background: #ffffff; + padding: 1px 2px; +} + +.figcenter { + margin: 2em auto 2em auto; + padding-right: 2.5em; + text-align: center; +} +.bbox {border: thin solid black; padding: 1em;} +.red {color: red;} + +.footnotes { + border: thin dashed black; + margin: 4em 5% 1em 5%; + padding: .5em 4% .5em 4%; +} + +.footnote {font-size: .95em;} + +.fnanchor { + vertical-align: 80%; + line-height: .7; + font-size: .75em; + text-decoration: none; +} +.footnote .fnanchor {font-size: .8em;} +.fnanchor.smaller {font-size: .5em; vertical-align: text-top;} + +blockquote { + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 5%; + font-size: 95%; +} + +.poem-container { + text-align: center; + font-size: 98%; +} + +.poem { + display: inline-block; + text-align: left; + margin-left: 0; +} + +.poem .stanza{ + padding: 0.5em 0; +} + +.poem span.iq {display: block; margin-left: -.2em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} +.poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} +.poem span.i3 {display: block; margin-left: 1.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} +.poem span.i4 {display: block; margin-left: 2em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} +.poem span.i6 {display: block; margin-left: 2.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} +.poem span.i10 {display: block; margin-left: 4.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} + +.transnote { + background-color: #EEE; + border: thin dotted; + font-family: sans-serif, serif; + color: #000; + margin-left: 5%; + margin-right: 5%; + margin-top: 4em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + padding: 1em; +} + +.sigright { + margin-right: 0; + text-align: right;} + +.gesperrt { + letter-spacing: 0.05em; + margin-right: -0.05em; +} + +span.locked {white-space:nowrap;} + +@media print, handheld +{ + h1, h2, .newpage {page-break-before: always;} + .nobreak {page-break-before: avoid;} + + p { + margin-top: .5em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: .25em; + } + + table {width: 100%;} + + .tdl { + padding-left: .5em; + text-indent: -.5em; + } + +} + +@media handheld +{ + body {margin: 0;} + + hr { + margin-top: .1em; + margin-bottom: .1em; + visibility: hidden; + color: white; + width: .01em; + display: none; + } + + blockquote {margin: 1.5em 3% 1.5em 3%;} + + .transnote { + page-break-inside: avoid; + margin-left: 2%; + margin-right: 2%; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + padding: .5em; + } + .hidepub {display: none;} +} + </style> + </head> +<body> +<div>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44695 ***</div> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 324px;"> +<img src="images/icover.jpg" width="324" height="500" class="hidepub" alt="Cover" /> +</div> + +<h1> +KING ROBERT<br /> +THE BRUCE:</h1> + +<hr /> + +<div class="newpage p4 poem-container"><div class="poem"> +<p class="center larger">FAMOUS SCOTS SERIES</p> + +<p class="p2 center"><i>The following Volumes are now ready</i>:—</p> + +<blockquote> + +<ul> +<li>THOMAS CARLYLE. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Hector C. Macpherson</span>.</span></li> + +<li>ALLAN RAMSAY. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Oliphant Smeaton</span>.</span></li> + +<li>HUGH MILLER. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">W. Keith Leask</span>.</span></li> + +<li>JOHN KNOX. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">A. Taylor Innes</span>.</span></li> + +<li>ROBERT BURNS. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Gabriel Setoun</span>.</span></li> + +<li>THE BALLADISTS. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">John Geddie</span>.</span></li> + +<li>RICHARD CAMERON. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Professor Herkless</span>.</span></li> + +<li>SIR JAMES Y. SIMPSON. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Eve Blantyre Simpson</span>.</span></li> + +<li>THOMAS CHALMERS. <span class="in1">By Professor <span class="smcap">W. Garden Blaikie</span>.</span></li> + +<li>JAMES BOSWELL. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">W. Keith Leask</span>.</span></li> + +<li>TOBIAS SMOLLETT. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Oliphant Smeaton</span>.</span></li> + +<li>FLETCHER OF SALTOUN. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">G. W. T. Omond</span>.</span></li> + +<li>THE "BLACKWOOD" GROUP. <span class="in1">By Sir <span class="smcap">George Douglas</span>.</span></li> + +<li>NORMAN MACLEOD. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">John Wellwood</span>.</span></li> + +<li>SIR WALTER SCOTT. <span class="in1">By Professor <span class="smcap">Saintsbury</span>.</span></li> + +<li>KIRKCALDY OF GRANGE. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Louis A. Barbé</span>.</span></li> + +<li>ROBERT FERGUSSON. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">A. B. Grosart</span>.</span></li> + +<li>JAMES THOMSON. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">William Bayne</span>.</span></li> + +<li>MUNGO PARK. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">T. Banks Maclachlan</span>.</span></li> + +<li>DAVID HUME. <span class="in1">By Professor <span class="smcap">Calderwood</span>.</span></li> + +<li>WILLIAM DUNBAR. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Oliphant Smeaton</span>.</span></li> + +<li>SIR WILLIAM WALLACE. <span class="in1">By Professor <span class="smcap">Murison</span>.</span></li> + +<li>ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Margaret Moyes Black</span>.</span></li> + +<li>THOMAS REID. <span class="in1">By Professor <span class="smcap">Campbell Fraser</span>.</span></li> + +<li>POLLOK AND AYTOUN. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Rosaline Masson</span>.</span></li> + +<li>ADAM SMITH. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">Hector C. Macpherson</span>.</span></li> + +<li>ANDREW MELVILLE. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">William Morison</span>.</span></li> + +<li>JAMES FREDERICK FERRIER. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">E. S. Haldane</span>.</span></li> + +<li>KING ROBERT THE BRUCE. <span class="in1">By <span class="smcap">A. F. Murison</span>.</span></li> +</ul> +</blockquote> +</div></div> + +<hr /> + +<div class="figcenter" style="width: 335px;"> +<img src="images/title.jpg" width="335" height="600" class="bbox" alt="Title Page" /> +</div> + +<p class="newpage p2 center xxlarge red"> +KING ROBERT<br /> +THE BRUCE</p> + +<p class="p2 center large"><span class="smaller">BY</span><br /> +A. F.<br /> +MURISON</p> + +<p class="p2 center larger">FAMOUS<br /> +SCOTS<br /> +SERIES</p> + +<p class="p2 center">PUBLISHED BY<br /> +OLIPHANT ANDERSON<br /> +& FERRIER <b>·</b> EDINBURGH<br /> +AND LONDON<br /> +</p> + +<hr /> + +<div class="newpage poem-container"><div class="poem"> +<p class="in0">The designs and ornaments of this<br /> +volume are by Mr Joseph Brown,<br /> +and the printing from the press of<br /> +Messrs Turnbull & Spears, Edinburgh.</p> + +<p class="in0 in1"> +<i>July 1899.</i> +</p> +</div></div> + +<hr /> + +<p class="newpage p4 center larger vspace"> +ALMAE MATRI<br /> +VNIVERSITATI ABERDONENSI<br /> +</p> + +<hr /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">6</a></span></p> + +<div class="newpage poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="iq">"O, ne'er shall the fame of the patriot decay—<br /></span> +<span class="i0">De Bruce! in thy name still our country rejoices;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">It thrills Scottish heart-strings, it swells Scottish voices,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">As it did when the Bannock ran red from the fray.<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Thine ashes in darkness and silence may lie;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">But ne'er, mighty hero, while earth hath its motion,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">While rises the day-star, or rolls forth the ocean,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Can thy deeds be eclipsed or their memory die:<br /></span> +<span class="i0">They stand thy proud monument, sculptur'd sublime<br /></span> +<span class="i0">By the chisel of Fame on the Tablet of Time."<br /></span> +</div> + +<p class="p0 sigright">∆.</p> +</div></div> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">7</a></span></p> + +<h2><a name="PREFACE" id="PREFACE">PREFACE</a></h2> + +<p>The present volume on King Robert the Bruce is the +historical complement to the former volume on Sir William +Wallace. Together they outline, from the standpoint of +the leading spirits, the prolonged and successful struggle +of the Scots against the unprovoked aggression of Edward I. +and Edward II.—the most memorable episode in the +history of Scotland.</p> + +<p>As in the story of Wallace, so in the story of Bruce, the +narrative is based on the primary authorities. Happily +State records and official papers supply much trustworthy +material, which furnishes also an invaluable test of the +accuracy of the numerous and wayward race of chroniclers. +Barbour's poem, with all its errors of fact and deflections +of judgment, is eminently useful—in spite of the indulgence +of historical criticism.</p> + +<p>There is no space here to set forth the long list of +sources, or to attempt a formal estimate of their comparative +value. Some of them appear incidentally in the +text, though only where it seems absolutely necessary to +name them. The expert knows them; the general reader +will not miss them. Nor is there room for more than +occasional argument on controverted points; it has very +frequently been necessary to signify disapproval by mere +silence. The writer, declining the guidance of modern<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">8</a></span> +historians, has formed his own conclusions on an independent +study of the available materials.</p> + +<p>After due reduction of the exaggerated pedestal of +Patriotism reared for Bruce by the indiscriminating, if +not time-serving, eulogies of Barbour and Fordun, and +maintained for some five centuries, the figure of the +Hero still remains colossal: he completed the national +deliverance.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">9</a></span></p> + +<h2><a name="CONTENTS" id="CONTENTS">CONTENTS</a></h2> + +<div class="center"> +<table summary="Contents"> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER I</td></tr> + <tr class="small"> + <td class="tdl"> </td> + <td class="tdr">PAGE</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The Ancestry of Bruce</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_11">11</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER II</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Opportunist Vacillation</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_18">18</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER III</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The Coronation of Bruce</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_26">26</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER IV</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Defeat and Disaster: Methven and Kildrummy</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_36">36</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER V</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The King in Exile</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_53">53</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER VI</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The Turn of the Tide</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_58">58</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER VII</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Reconquest of Territory</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_69">69</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER VIII</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Recovery of Fortresses</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_84">84</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER IX</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The Battle of Bannockburn</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_92">92</a><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">10</a></span></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER X</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Invasion of England and Ireland</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_108">108</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER XI</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Conciliation and Conflict</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_119">119</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER XII</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">Peace at the Sword's Point</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_134">134</a></td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdc chap" colspan="2">CHAPTER XIII</td></tr> + <tr> + <td class="tdl"><span class="smcap">The Heart of the Bruce</span></td> + <td class="tdr"><a href="#Page_149">149</a></td></tr> +</table></div> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">11</a></span></p> + +<p class="newpage p2 center xlarge gesperrt"><b>KING ROBERT THE BRUCE</b></p> + +<hr /> +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_I" id="CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">THE ANCESTRY OF BRUCE</span></h2> + +<p>When Sir William Wallace, the sole apparent hope of +Scottish independence, died at the foot of the gallows in +Smithfield, and was torn limb from limb, it seemed that at +last 'the accursed nation' would quietly submit to the +English yoke. The spectacle of the bleaching bones of the +heroic Patriot would, it was anticipated, overawe such of +his countrymen as might yet cherish perverse aspirations +after national freedom. It was a delusive anticipation. In +fifteen years of arduous diplomacy and warfare, with an +astounding expenditure of blood and treasure, Edward I. +had crushed the leaders and crippled the resources of +Scotland, but he had inadequately estimated the spirit of +the nation. Only six months, and Scotland was again in +arms. It is of the irony of fate that the very man destined +to bring Edward's calculations to naught had been his +most zealous officer in his last campaign, and had, in all +probability, been present at the trial—it may be at the +execution—of Wallace, silently consenting to his death. +That man of destiny was Sir Robert de Brus, Lord of +Annandale and Earl of Carrick.</p> + +<div class="tb">*<span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span></div> + +<p>The Bruces came over with the Conqueror. The theory +of a Norse origin in a follower of Rollo the Ganger, who +established himself in the diocese of Coutances in Manche, +Normandy, though not improbable, is but vaguely supported. +The name is territorial; and the better opinion +is inclined to connect it with Brix, between Cherbourg and +Valognes.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">12</a></span> +The first Robert de Brus on record was probably the +leader of the Brus contingent in the army of the Conqueror. +His services must have been conspicuous; he died (about +1094) in possession of some 40,000 acres, comprised in +forty-three manors in the East and West Ridings of Yorkshire, +and fifty-one in the North Riding and in Durham. +The chief manor was Skelton in Cleveland.</p> + +<p>The next Robert de Brus, son of the first, received a +grant of Annandale from David I., whose companion he +had been at the English court. This fief he renounced, +probably in favour of his second son, just before the Battle +of the Standard (1138), on the failure of his attempted +mediation between David and the English barons. He +died in 1141, leaving two sons, Adam and Robert.</p> + +<p>This Robert may be regarded as the true founder of the +Scottish branch. He is said to have remained with David +in the Battle of the Standard, and, whether for this adherence +or on some subsequent occasion, he was established +in possession of the Annandale fief, which was confirmed +to him by a charter of William the Lion (1166). He is said +to have received from his father the manor of Hert and the +lands of Hertness in Durham, 'to supply him with wheat, +which did not grow in Annandale.' He died after 1189.</p> + +<p>The second Robert de Brus of Annandale, son of the +preceding lord, married (1183) Isabel, daughter of William +the Lion, obtaining as her dowry the manor of Haltwhistle +in Tyndale. His widow married Robert de Ros in +1191. The uncertainty as to the dates of his father's death +and his own has suggested a doubt whether he ever +succeeded to the lordship.</p> + +<p>William de Brus, a brother, the next lord, died in 1215.</p> + +<p>The third Robert de Brus of Annandale, son of William, +founded the claim of his descendants to the crown by his +marriage with Isabel, second daughter of David, Earl of +Huntingdon, younger brother of William the Lion. He +died in 1245.</p> + +<p>The fourth Robert de Brus of Annandale, eldest son of +the preceding lord, was born in 1210. In 1244, he +married Isabel, daughter of Gilbert de Clare, Earl of +Gloucester. Next year he succeeded to Annandale, and, +on his mother's death in 1251, he obtained ten knight's<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">13</a></span> +fees in England, her share of the Earldom of Huntingdon. +He took an active part in public affairs. In 1249–50 he +sat as a Justice of the King's Bench, and in 1268 he +became Chief Justice of England, but Edward, on his +accession (1272), did not reappoint him. He served as +Sheriff of Cumberland and Governor of Carlisle Castle in +1254–55, and in 1264 he fought for Henry at Lewes, and +was taken prisoner.</p> + +<p>At the same time, de Brus was a prominent figure in the +baronage of Scotland. The alleged arrangement of 1238 +whereby Alexander II., with the consent of the Scots +parliament, appointed de Brus his successor in the event +of his dying childless, was frustrated by the King's second +marriage (1239), and the birth of a son, Alexander III. +(1241). As one of the fifteen Regents (1255) during the +minority of Alexander III., he headed the party that +favoured an English alliance, cemented by the young +King's marriage with Margaret, daughter of Henry III. +At the Scone convention on February 5, 1283–84, he was +one of the Scots lords that recognised the right of Margaret +of Norway. The sudden death of Alexander III., however, +in March 1285–86, and the helplessness of the infant +Queen, put him on the alert for the chances of his own +elevation.</p> + +<p>On September 20, 1286, de Brus met a number of his +friends at Turnberry Castle, the residence of his son, the +Earl of Carrick. There fourteen Scots nobles, including +de Brus and the Earl of Carrick, joined in a bond obliging +them to give faithful adherence to Richard de Burgh, Earl +of Ulster, and Lord Thomas de Clare (de Brus's brother-in-law), +'in their affairs.' One of the clauses saved the +fealty of the parties to the King of England and to 'him +that shall obtain the kingdom of Scotland through blood-relationship +with King Alexander of blessed memory, according +to the ancient customs in the kingdom of Scotland +approved and observed.' The disguise was very thin. The +instrument meant simply that the parties were to act together +in support of de Brus's pretensions to the crown when +opportunity should serve. It 'united the chief influence +of the West and South of Scotland against the party of +John de Balliol, Lord of Galloway, and the Comyns.'<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">14</a></span> +There need be no difficulty in connecting this transaction +with the outbreak of 1287–88, which devastated Dumfries +and Wigton shires. The party of de Brus took the castles +of Dumfries, Buittle and Wigton, killing and driving out +of the country many of the lieges. There remains nothing +to show by what means peace was restored, but it may be +surmised that Edward interfered to restrain his ambitious +vassal.</p> + +<p>For, by this time, Edward was full of his project for the +marriage of the young Queen with his eldest son, Prince +Edward. The Salisbury convention, at which de Brus +was one of the Scottish commissioners, and the Brigham +conference, at which the project was openly declared, +seemed to strike a fatal blow at the aspirations of de Brus. +But the death of the Queen, reported early in October +1290, again opened up a vista of hope.</p> + +<p>When the news arrived, the Scots estates were in session. +'Sir Robert de Brus, who before did not intend to +come to the meeting,' wrote the Bishop of St Andrews +to Edward on October 7, 'came with great power, to +confer with some who were there; but what he intends to +do, or how to act, as yet we know not. But the Earls of +Mar and Athol are collecting their forces, and some other +nobles of the land are drawing to their party.' The +Bishop went on to report a 'fear of a general war,' to +recommend Edward to deal wisely with Sir John de +Balliol, and to suggest that he should 'approach the March +for the consolation of the Scots people and the saving of +bloodshed.' The alertness of de Brus and his friends is +conspicuously manifest, and the foremost of the party of +Balliol is privately stretching out his hands for the cautious +intervention of the English King.</p> + +<p>The Earl of Fife had been assassinated; the Earl of +Buchan was dead; and the remaining four guardians +divided their influence, the Bishop of St Andrews and +Sir John Comyn siding with Balliol, and the Bishop of +Glasgow and the Steward of Scotland with de Brus. Fordun +thus describes the balance of parties in the early part +of 1291:</p> + +<blockquote> + +<p>The nobles of the kingdom, with its guardians, often-times discussed +among themselves the question who should be made their<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">15</a></span> +king; but they did not make bold to utter what they felt about the +right of succession, partly because it was a hard and knotty matter, +partly because different people felt differently about such rights and +wavered a good deal, partly because they justly feared the power of +the parties, which was great, and partly because they had no superior +that could, by his unbending power, carry their award into execution +or make the parties abide by their decision.</p></blockquote> + +<p>The most prominent competitors were liegemen of Edward, +and, whether they appealed to warlike or to peaceful methods, +the decision must inevitably rest with him.</p> + +<p>At the Norham meeting of June 1291, de Brus, as well +as the other competitors, fully acknowledged the paramount +title of Edward. He had no alternative; he had as large +interests in England as in Scotland, and armed opposition +was out of the question. Availing himself of his legal +experience, he fought the case determinedly and astutely. +If Fordun correctly reports the reformation of the law of +succession by Malcolm, de Brus was, in literal technicality, +'the next descendant'; as son of David of Huntingdon's +second daughter, he was nearer by one degree than Balliol, +grandson of David's eldest daughter. But the modern +reckoning prevailed. De Brus's plea that he had been recognised +both by Alexander II. and by Alexander III. was +not supported by documentary evidence, and his appeal +to the recollection of living witnesses does not seem to +have been entertained. His third position, that the crown +estates were partible, was but a forlorn hope. He must +have seen, long before November 1292, that an adverse +decision was a foregone conclusion. He entered a futile +protest. Already, in June, he had concluded a secret +agreement with the Count of Holland, a competitor never +in the running, but a great feudal figure, for mutual aid +and counsel; he had also an agreement with the Earl of +Sutherland, and, probably enough, with others. But an +active dissent was beyond the powers of a man of eighty-two. +Accordingly, he resigned his claims in favour of his +son, the Earl of Carrick, and retired to Lochmaben, where +he died on March 31, 1295, at the age of eighty-five.</p> + +<p>The fifth Robert de Brus of Annandale, the eldest son +of the Competitor, was born in 1253. On his return from +the crusade of 1269, on which he accompanied Prince +Edward, afterwards Edward I., he married Marjory (or<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">16</a></span> +Margaret), Countess of Carrick, and thus became by the +courtesy of Scotland Earl of Carrick. Marjory was the +daughter and heiress of Nigel, the Keltic (if Keltic be the +right epithet) Earl of Carrick, grandson of Gilbert, son of +Fergus, Lord of Galloway, and she was the widow of +Adam of Kilconquhar, who had died on the recent crusade. +De Brus is said to have met her accidentally when she +was out hunting. Fordun gives the romance as <span class="locked">follows:—</span></p> + +<blockquote> + +<p>When greetings and kisses had been exchanged, as is the wont of +courtiers, she besought him to stay and hunt and walk about; and, +seeing that he was rather unwilling to do so, she by force, so to +speak, with her own hand made him pull up, and brought the +knight, though very loth, to her castle of Turnberry with her. After +dallying there with his followers for the space of fifteen days or more, +he clandestinely took the Countess to wife, the friends and well-wishers +of both parties knowing nothing about it, and the King's +consent not having been obtained. And so the common belief of all +the country was that she had seized—by force, as it were—this youth +for her husband. But when the news came to the ears of King +Alexander, he took the castle of Turnberry and made all her other +lands and possessions be acknowledged as his lands, for the reason +that she had wedded with Robert de Brus without consulting his royal +majesty. Through the prayers of friends, however, and by a certain +sum of money agreed upon, this Robert gained the King's goodwill +and the whole domain.</p></blockquote> + +<p>It may be, of course, that the responsibility was thrown +on the lady in order to restrain the hand of the incensed +king. But she was half a dozen years older than de Brus, +who was still in his teens and was never distinguished for +enterprise. In any case, she acted only with the legitimate +frankness of her time, and the marriage put a useful +dash of lively blood into the veins of the coming king.</p> + +<p>In every important political step, de Brus followed with +docility his father's lead. He stood aloof from Balliol, +and, in spite of marked snubbing, steadily adhered to +Edward. From October 1295, he was for two years +governor of Carlisle Castle. After the collapse of Balliol +at Dunbar, he is said to have plucked up courage to claim +fulfilment of a promise of Edward's, alleged to have been +made in 1292 immediately after the decision in favour +of Balliol, to place his father eventually on the Scottish +throne. The testy reply of 'the old dodger' (<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">ille antiquus +doli artifex</i>), as reported by Fordun, is at any rate characteristic:<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">17</a></span> +'Have I nothing else to do but to win kingdoms +to give to you?' The story, though essentially probable, +is discredited by the chronicler's assertion that the promise +was accompanied by an acknowledgment on the part +of Edward that his decision of the great cause was an +injustice to de Brus, the Competitor.</p> + +<p>But while de Brus took nothing by his loyalty to +Edward, he suffered for his disloyalty to Balliol. He had, +of course, ignored the summons of Balliol 'to come in arms +to resist the King of England,' and consequently Balliol's +council had declared him a public enemy and deprived +him of his lands of Annandale, giving them to Comyn, +Earl of Buchan. At the same time, and for the like reason, +his son Robert was deprived of the Earldom of Carrick, +which de Brus had resigned to him on November 11, +1292. Annandale, indeed, was restored to de Brus in +September 1296, but the state of Scotland was too disturbed +for his comfort, and he retired to his English possessions, +where, for the most part at least, he lived quietly +till Edward had settled matters at Strathord. He then +set out for Annandale, but died on the way, about Easter, +1304, and was buried at the Abbey of Holmcultram in +Cumberland.</p> + +<p>De Brus left a large family of sons and daughters, most +of whom will find conspicuous mention in the story of the +eldest brother, Robert, Earl of Carrick, the future King of +Scotland.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">18</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_II" id="CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">OPPORTUNIST VACILLATION</span></h2> + +<p>Robert Bruce, the sixth Robert de Brus of Annandale +and the seventh de Brus of the Annandale line, was the +eldest son of the preceding lord and a grandson of the +Competitor. He was born on July 11, 1274. The place +of his birth is uncertain—Ayrshire says Turnberry; Dumfriesshire +says Lochmaben. Geoffrey le Baker calls him +an Englishman (<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">nacione Anglicus</i>), and records that he was +'born in Essex,' to which another hand adds, 'at Writtle,' +a manor of his father's. Geoffrey, it is true, like several +other chroniclers, confuses Bruce with his grandfather, the +Competitor; and he may mean the Competitor, though he +says the King. Hemingburgh makes Bruce speak to his +father's vassals before the Irvine episode as a Scotsman, at +any rate by descent. In any case Bruce was essentially—by +upbringing and associations—an Englishman. It was +probably in, or at any rate about, the same year that +Wallace was born. At the English invasion of 1296, they +would both be vigorous young men of twenty-two, or thereabouts. +During most part of the next decade Wallace +fought and negotiated and died in his country's cause, +and built himself an everlasting name. How was Bruce +occupied during this national crisis?</p> + +<p>Considering the large territorial possessions and wide +social interlacings of the family in England, their English +upbringing, their traditional service to the English King, +their subordinate interest in Scottish affairs, the predominance +of the rival house of Balliol, and the masterful character +of Edward, it is not at all surprising that Robert +Bruce should have preferred the English allegiance when +it was necessary for him to choose between England and +Scotland. On August 3, 1293, indeed, he offered homage +to Balliol on succeeding to the Earldom of Carrick. But<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">19</a></span> +on March 25, 1296, at Wark—three days before Edward +crossed the Tweed—he joined with his father and the +Earls of March and Angus in a formal acknowledgment +of the English King; and on August 28 he, as well as +his father, followed the multitude of the principal Scots +in doing homage to the conqueror at Berwick.</p> + +<p>With this political subjection one is reluctant to associate +a more sordid kind of obligation. Some six weeks later +(October 15) it is recorded that 'the King, for the great +esteem he has for the good service of Robert de Brus, +Earl of Carrick, commands the barons to atterm his debts +at the Exchequer in the easiest manner for him.' But the +elder Bruce continued to be designated Earl of Carrick in +English documents after he had resigned the earldom to +his son, and it can hardly be doubted that the debts were +his. It is a small matter, indeed, yet one would like to +start Bruce without the burden.</p> + +<p>Early in 1297, Scotland was heaving with unrest. +Edward, while busily arranging 'to cross seas' to +Flanders, was also pushing forward preparations for a +'Scottish War.' In May, Wallace and Douglas had +summarily interrupted the severities of Ormsby, the +English Justiciar, at Scone, and driven him home in +headlong flight. About the same time, or somewhat later, +Andrew de Moray took the field in Moray, Macduff rose +in Fife, and Sir Alexander of Argyll set upon the adherents +of Edward in the West. On May 24, Edward had addressed, +from Portsmouth, a circular order to his chief +liegemen north and south of Forth, requiring them to attend +certain of his great officers to hear 'certain matters which +he has much at heart,' and to act as directed. Bruce was +ordered to attend Sir Hugh de Cressingham and Sir Osbert +de Spaldington at Berwick. But before the order could +have reached him, he must have heard of the expulsion of +Ormsby, and had probably conceived dynastic hopes from +the aspect of affairs. Indeed, he appears to have fallen +under English suspicions. For, no sooner did the news +from Scone reach Carlisle than the Bishop and his advisers—the +Bishop was acting governor in the absence of the +elder Bruce at Portsmouth—'fearing for the faithlessness +and inconstancy of Sir Robert de Bruys the younger, Earl<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">20</a></span> +of Carrick, sent messengers to summon him to come on a +day fixed to treat with them about the King's affairs, if so +be that he still remained faithful to the King.'</p> + +<p>Bruce duly appeared with a strong following of 'the +people of Galloway,' and repeated the oath of fealty upon +the consecrated Host and upon the sword of St Thomas +(à Becket). What more could the Bishop want or do? +But Bruce went a step further. He summoned his people, +says Hemingburgh, and, 'in order to feign colour, he proceeded +to the lands of Sir William de Douglas and burnt part +of them with fire, and carried off his wife and children with +him to Annandale.' For all that, he was already in secret +conspiracy with the Bishop of Glasgow, the Steward of +Scotland, and Sir John of Bonkill, the Steward's brother. +Douglas, indeed, presently appears as one of the leaders in +the rising; but his relations with Bruce would be subject +to easy diplomatic adjustment.</p> + +<p>When the time for open action arrived, Bruce appealed +to his father's men of Annandale. He repudiated his oath +at Carlisle as extorted by force and intimidation, and professed +a compelling sense of patriotism. The Annandale +men deferred reply till the morrow, and slipped away to +their homes overnight. With his Carrick men, however, +he joined the Bishop and the Steward, and began to slay +and harry the English in the south-west.</p> + +<p>Engrossed in the outfitting of his expedition, Edward +delegated the suppression of the Scots to Warenne, Earl of +Surrey, the Guardian of Scotland, who sent ahead his kinsman, +Sir Henry de Percy, with a strong force. Percy +advanced through Annandale to Ayr, and, two or three +days later, stood face to face with the insurgents near +Irvine. There was dissension in the Scots camp. Sir +Richard Lundy went over to Percy, 'saying that he would +no longer war in company with men in discord and at variance.' +Besides, the English force was no doubt much +superior. The insurgent leaders at once asked for terms. +The provisional agreement was that 'their lives, limbs, +lands, tenements, goods and chattels,' should be unharmed, +that their offences should be condoned, and that they +should furnish hostages. Such was the humiliating fiasco +of July 7, 1297, at Irvine.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">21</a></span> +So far their skins were safe; and now, on the counsel of +the Bishop, they appealed to Cressingham and Warenne to +confirm the agreement, and to vouchsafe an active interest +in their behalf with Edward. The full flavour of their +pusillanimity can only be gathered from the text of their +letter to Warenne.</p> + +<blockquote> + +<p>They were afraid the English army would attack them to burn and +destroy their lands. Thus, they were told for a certainty that the +King meant to seize all the middle people of Scotland to send them +beyond sea in his war [in Gascony], to their great damage and destruction. +They took counsel to assemble their power to defend +themselves from so great damages, until they could have treaty and +conference with such persons as had power to abate and diminish such +kind of injury, and to give security that they should not be exceedingly +aggrieved and dishonoured. And, therefore, when the host of England +entered the land, they went to meet them and had such a conference +that they all came to the peace and the faith of our Lord the King.</p></blockquote> + +<p>The hostage for Bruce was his infant daughter, Marjory. +It would be interesting to know why Douglas failed to provide +hostages. It may be that his native obstinacy was +aroused by the objurgations of Wallace, who then lay in +Selkirk Forest, and who is said to have displayed intense +indignation at the ignominious surrender. Edward ratified +the convention; but somehow it was not till November 14 +that powers were conferred on the Bishop of Carlisle and Sir +Robert de Clifford 'to receive to the King's peace Robert +de Brus, Earl of Carrick, and his friends, as seems best to +their discretion.'</p> + +<p>Midway between the shameful collapse at Irvine and +the formal submission at Carlisle lay September 11, 1297, +and Wallace's memorable victory at Stirling Bridge. In this +great triumph of patriotism Bruce had neither part nor lot. +Neither was he present at the disastrous battle of Falkirk +on July 22, 1298. The Scottish chroniclers, indeed, relate +the popular story that the English victory was primarily +due to Bruce, who, with Bishop Bek, stealthily caught the +Scots in the rear and broke up the schiltrons. But this is +a complete misconception, due possibly to a confusion of +Bruce with Basset, who, with Bek, delivered the attack on +the left wing, not on the rear, or with Bruce's uncle, Sir +Bernard, who fought on the English side. In any case, +Bruce stands clear of Falkirk. For English chroniclers<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">22</a></span> +relate that, when Edward withdrew towards Carlisle, Bruce +burnt Ayr Castle and fled away into Carrick. Yet it seems +all but certain that he was in Edward's allegiance within +three weeks before the battle. He had gone over before +the result reached him, possibly on learning the dire straits +of Edward immediately before, or on the strength of a false +report of the issue.</p> + +<p>The stormy meeting of Scots nobles at Peebles on August +19, 1299, discovers Bruce in a remarkable attitude. One +object of the meeting was to choose Guardians of the realm. +The discussion was sufficiently warm; for Sir John Comyn—the +Red Comyn, afterwards slain at Dumfries—seized +the Earl of Carrick by the throat, and his cousin of Buchan +tried a fall with de Lamberton, Wallace's Bishop of St +Andrews. The outcome of the wrangle was a purely +personal accommodation of an essentially momentary +character. It was settled that the Bishop of St Andrews, +the Earl of Carrick, and Sir John Comyn should be the +Guardians, the Bishop as principal to have custody of the +castles. Bruce, through the Wallace influence, had gained +the upper hand. But it must have cost him a pang to +consent to act in the name of Balliol.</p> + +<p>Bruce, with Sir David de Brechin, returned to the attack +of Lochmaben peel, where the Scots had been pressing +Clifford since the beginning of August. They were unsuccessful +in direct assault, but they seriously hindered the +victualling of the place by infesting the lines of communication. +Bruce would seem to have been in consultation with +his colleagues in the Torwood on November 13, when the +Guardians, who were then besieging Stirling, despatched to +Edward an offer to cease hostilities on the terms suggested +by the King of France. At any rate he is named as +Guardian, and it is to be noted that the Guardians write +'in the name of King John and the community of the +realm.' Edward was compelled to abandon Stirling +to its fate, and Lochmaben fell in the end of the year. +Warenne's December expedition to the western March +was a failure. Edward, in fact, had been paralysed by +his refractory barons.</p> + +<p>During the next two years, while Comyn was doing his +best in the field and Wallace was busy in diplomatic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">23</a></span> +negotiation, there is no trace of Bruce in the records. He +may have felt it too irksome to pull together with Comyn. +But he reappears—in a new coat—in 1301–2. On February +16, Edward, 'at the instance of the Earl of Carrick,' granted +pardon to a murderous rascal, one Hector Askeloc. And +by April 28, 1302, the King had 'of special favour granted +to the tenants of his liege Robert de Brus, Earl of Carrick, +their lands in England lately taken for their rebellion.' +And Bruce attended Edward's parliament towards the end +of October.</p> + +<p>In the next year or two Bruce manifested special devotion +to the English King. When Edward was going north +on the campaign of 1303, he ordered Bruce to meet him +about the middle of May at Roxburgh with all the men-at-arms +he could muster, and with 1000 foot from Carrick +and Galloway. On July 14, Bruce received an advance of +pay by the precept of Sir Aymer de Valence, the King's lieutenant +south of Forth. On December 30, he is Edward's +sheriff of Lanark; on January 9, he is Edward's constable +of Ayr Castle. His star was deservedly in the ascendant by +diligent service.</p> + +<p>His ardour steadily increased. After the surrender of +Comyn and his adherents in February 1303–4, he threw +himself heartily into the pursuit of Wallace. On March 3, +Edward wrote to 'his loyal and faithful Robert de Brus, +Earl of Carrick, Sir John de Segrave, and their company,' +applauding their diligence, begging them to complete the +business they had begun so well, and urging them, 'as the +cloak is well made, also to make the hood.' Wallace and +Sir Simon Fraser were hotly pursued southwards, and +defeated at Peebles within a week.</p> + +<p>About this time Bruce must have received news of the +death of his father, probably not unexpected. On April 4, +1304, he was at Hatfield in Essex, whence he wrote to Sir +William de Hamilton, the Chancellor, asking him to direct +quickly the necessary inquisitions of his father's lands in +Essex, Middlesex and Huntingdon, as he wished to go to +the King with them to do homage. On June 14, having +done homage and fealty, he was served heir. The succession +to the paternal inheritance was happily achieved.</p> + +<p>Meantime, on his return north, Bruce had found Edward<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">24</a></span> +in hot eagerness to commence the siege of Stirling, and +worked with the energy of gratitude that looks towards +favours to come. He undertook the special task of getting +up the King's engines to Stirling. On April 16, the King +wrote him thanks for sending up some engines, and gave +particular instructions about 'the great engine of Inverkip,' +which appears to have been unmanageable for want of 'a +waggon fit to carry the frame.' Bruce seems to have been +at Inverkip and Glasgow, and wherever else any of the +thirteen engines were lagging on the road to Stirling. His +energy operated in congenial harmony with the fiery +expedition of the King.</p> + +<p>Yet there was something in the background of all this +enthusiastic service. On June 11, only three days before +'his loyal and faithful Robert de Brus' did homage and +fealty to Edward on succession to his father, Bruce met +Bishop Lamberton at Cambuskenneth and formed with +him a secret alliance for mutual aid and defence 'against +all persons whatsoever.' Seeing dangers ahead, and wishing +to fortify themselves against 'the attempts of their +rivals,' they engaged to assist each other to the utmost of +their power with counsel and material forces in all their +affairs; 'that neither of them would undertake any important +enterprise without consultation with the other'; +and that 'they would warn each other against any impending +danger, and do their best to avert the same from each +other.' No particular motives or objects, of course, are +specified. But the Bishop may have foreseen the likelihood +of an invasion of English ecclesiastics; and Bruce +would not be slow to perceive the possible value of the +moral support of the Church, and of the material aid derivable +from the men and lands of the religious houses of the +wide episcopate of St Andrews. At such a moment neither +party would affect to forget the Bruce's royal pretensions. +We shall hear of this bond again.</p> + +<p>Stirling surrendered on July 20, the last of the Scottish +fortresses that held out against Edward. Wallace, the last +centre of opposition, was a fugitive, dogged by emissaries +of the English King. In March next year, Bruce was with +the King at Westminster, petitioning him for the lands +recently held by Sir Ingram de Umfraville in Carrick—a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">25</a></span> +petition substantially granted—and he attended Edward's +parliament in Lent. It is hardly any stretch of probability +to believe that he was present, in August, at the trial and +execution of the illustrious Wallace—the man that, above +all others, paved the way for his elevation to the Scottish +throne.</p> + +<div class="tb">*<span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span></div> + +<p>Bruce was now in his thirty-second year. From his +twenty-second year onwards, through the ten years' +struggle of Wallace and Comyn, he was two parts of the +time the active henchman of Edward, and during the other +part he is not known to have performed any important +service for Scotland. His action during this period—the +period of vigorous manhood, of generous impulses and +unselfish enthusiasms—contrasts lamentably with the +splendour of Wallace's achievement and endeavour, and +gravely with the bearing of Comyn. One looks for +patriotism and heroism; one finds not a spark of either, +but only opportunism, deliberate and ignoble, not to say +timid—the conduct of a 'spotted and inconstant man.' +Yet Bruce was tenaciously constant to the grand object of +his ambition. In the light of his kingly career this early +period has puzzled the historians very strangely; but one +cannot affect to be surprised that the friendliest critic is +compelled to pronounce the simple enumeration of the +facts to be, 'in truth, a humiliating record.'</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">26</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_III" id="CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">THE CORONATION OF BRUCE</span></h2> + +<p>Stirling surrendered and Wallace a fugitive, Edward +went home and meditated measures for the government +of the conquered country. While yielding no point of +substance, he recognised the policy of conciliation in form. +He took counsel with the Bishop of Glasgow, the Earl of +Carrick, and Sir John de Mowbray; and, ostensibly guided +by their suggestions, he appointed a meeting of ten Scots +and twenty English representatives to be held in London +in the middle of July. The meeting was subsequently +postponed to September. On September 23, all the representatives +were 'sworn on our Lord's body, the holy +relics, and holy Evangels, each severally.' The joint +commission settled ten points, which were embodied in an +Ordinance—'not a logical or methodical document,' but +'mixing up the broadest projects of legislation and administration +with mere personal interests and arrangements.' +First, the official establishment was set forth: +Sir John de Bretagne, junior, Edward's nephew, being +appointed King's Lieutenant and Warden, Sir William de +Bevercotes Chancellor, and Sir John de Sandale Chamberlain. +Next, Justiciars were appointed, a pair for each of the +four divisions of the country. Then a score of Sheriffs were +named, nearly all Englishmen, though Scots were eligible. +Thereafter, the law was taken in hand: 'the custom of +the Scots and Brets' was abolished; and the King's +Lieutenant, with English and Scots advisers, was 'to +amend such of the laws and usages which are plainly +against God and reason,' referring difficulties to the King. +For the rest, the articles were mainly particular. One of +them applied specifically to Bruce: 'The Earl of Carrick +to place Kildrummy Castle in the keeping of one for whom +he shall answer.' The King confirmed the Ordinance at<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">27</a></span> +Sheen. At the same time (October 26), apparently, the +King's Council for Scotland—twenty members, including +the Bishop of St Andrews, the Earls of Carrick, Buchan, +and Athol, Sir John Comyn, and Sir Alexander of Argyll—was +sworn in. Bretagne was unable to proceed to Scotland +till Lent (and then till Easter), and meantime a +commission of four was appointed to act for him, the first +commissioner being the Bishop of St Andrews.</p> + +<p>The King rejoiced at the sure prospect of peace in +Scotland. The country was outwardly quiet. Edward +had put on the velvet glove. He had restored submissive +barons, knights, and lairds to their lands; he had that +very day at Sheen doubled the periods within which they +might pay their several fines; and he had displayed a +general friendly consideration in his Ordinance. A fortnight +before (October 14), he had instructed all the +English sheriffs that he desired honourable and courteous +treatment to be shown to all Scots passing through their +jurisdictions. In a short time, he was contemplating a +more complete assimilation of the two countries, to be +arranged in a Union convention at Carlisle. But, in +February next, the whole face of affairs was suddenly +transformed by the report that Sir Robert de Brus, Earl +of Carrick, had done sacrilegious murder on Sir John +Comyn at Dumfries.</p> + +<div class="tb">*<span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span></div> + +<p>The accounts of the train of events leading to the death +of Comyn, though agreeing in essentials, vary considerably +in details. The Scots story may be told first. Fordun, +like his compatriots, colours his narrative deeply with the +fanciful glow of Bruce's patriotism. He tells how Bruce +'faithfully laid before Comyn the unworthy thraldom of +the country, the cruel and endless torment of the people, +and his own kindly project for bringing them relief.' +Bruce, he says, 'setting the public advantage before his +own,' proposed to Comyn two alternatives: either take +you the crown and give me your lands, or else take my +lands and support my claim to the crown. Comyn chose +the latter alternative; and the agreement was guaranteed +by oaths and embodied in indentures duly sealed. Eventually, +however, Comyn betrayed Bruce's confidence, 'accusing<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">28</a></span> +him again and again before the King of England, +by envoys and by private letters, and wickedly revealing +his secrets.' Edward acted with restraint: he sounded +Bruce; he even showed him his adversary's letters; he +feigned acceptance of his explanations. One evening, +however, 'when the wine glittered in the bowl,' he expressed +his definite determination to put Bruce to death +on the morrow. On hearing this, the Earl of Gloucester +at once sent Bruce a broad hint in the form of twelve +pence and a pair of spurs. Bruce promptly mounted +his horse, and rode day and night to his castle of +Lochmaben. As he was nearing the Border, he met +a messenger of Comyn's bearing to Edward the very +bond he had made with Comyn. He struck off the +man's head and hurried on his way. By appointment, +he presently met Comyn in the church of the Friars +Minorites at Dumfries. He charged Comyn with treachery. +'You lie!' replied Comyn. Whereupon Bruce stabbed him +on the spot. The friars stretched Comyn on the floor +behind the altar. 'Is your wound mortal?' he was asked. +'I think not,' he replied. The hopeful answer sealed his +fate. 'His foes, hearing this, gave him another wound, +and thus, on February <span class="locked">10,<a name="FNanchor_1" id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">1</a></span> was he taken away from the +world.'</p> + +<p>According to Barbour, the alternative proposal proceeded, +not from Bruce, but from Comyn, which is far +from likely; and it was made 'as they came riding from +Stirling,' presumably—Blind Harry, indeed, expressly +says so—when Edward and his barons were going home +from the siege. Barbour goes beyond Fordun in stating +that Comyn actually rode to Edward and placed in his +hands the indenture with Bruce's seal. Thereupon, he +says, the King 'was angry out of measure and swore that +he would take vengeance on Bruce' for his presumption, +summoned a council, produced the bond, and demanded +of Bruce whether the seal was his; but Bruce obtained<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">29</a></span> +respite till next day in order to get his seal and compare +it with the bond, and fled the same night with the document +in his pocket. The embellishments of later writers—the +conversion of Gloucester's twelve pence into other +coins, the reversal of Bruce's horses' shoes because of the +new-fallen snow, and so forth—need not be considered. +Barbour makes no mention of an appointment: Bruce +rode over to Dumfries, where Comyn was staying, and +the tragedy was enacted. Barbour has the same outline +of the interview as Fordun, but he remarks that other +accounts were current in his time.</p> + +<p>A picturesque tradition tells how Bruce, on striking the +blow, hurried out of the church to his friends, whereupon +Roger de Kirkpatrick and James de Lindsay, seeing his +excitement, anxiously inquired how it was with him. 'Ill!' +replied Bruce; 'I doubt I have slain the Red Comyn.' +'You doubt!' cried Kirkpatrick; 'I'll mak' siccar' (make +sure). And they rushed into the church and buried their +daggers in Comyn's body. But if the Justiciars were then +sitting, and Roger de Kirkpatrick was still one of them—for +he and Walter de Burghdon were appointed Justiciars +for Galloway on October 25—there may be some difficulty +in accepting the tradition.</p> + +<p>The English story commences in Scotland, and it introduces +a very important element wholly absent from the +principal Scottish versions. The English authorities +expressly allege a deliberate purpose on Bruce's part to +rid himself of his rival. Both Hemingburgh and the +Lanercost Chronicler state that Bruce sent two of his +brothers, with guileful intent, to invite Comyn to an interview; +Hemingburgh names Thomas and Nigel. The +fullest account is given by Sir Thomas Gray, who wrote +in 1355—just half a century later, but still twenty and +thirty years earlier than Barbour and Fordun. Gray +records that Bruce dispatched his brothers, Thomas and +Nigel, from Lochmaben to Dalswinton, where Comyn was +staying, to invite him to meet Robert in the church at +Dumfries; and, moreover, that he instructed them to fall +upon Comyn on the way and kill him—a purpose thwarted +by the softening effect of Comyn's kindly reception of the +youths. 'Hm!' said Bruce, on hearing their report, 'milk-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">30</a></span>sops +you are, and no mistake; let me meet him.' So he +advanced to Comyn, and led him up to the high altar. +He then opened the question of the condition of Scotland, +and invited Comyn's co-operation in an attempt at freedom +on the terms already mentioned as contained in +the alleged bond between them. 'For now is the time,' +he said, 'in the old age of the King.' Comyn firmly +refused. 'No?' cried Bruce, 'I had other hopes in +you, by promise of your own and of your friends. You +discovered me to the King by your letters. Since while +you live I cannot fulfil my purpose, you shall have your +guerdon!' On the word, he struck Comyn with his +dagger, and some of his companions completed the crime +with their swords before the altar.</p> + +<p>Hemingburgh works up artistically the pacific bearing +of Comyn in the face of Bruce's accusations; and this +would be likely enough if it be true that Comyn was +unarmed and attended by but a small escort. The writer +of the Merton MS. of the <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Flores Historiarum</i>, who says +Comyn was unarmed, states that he endeavoured to wrest +Bruce's weapon from his hand; that Bruce's men rushed +up and freed their leader; that Comyn got away to the +altar; and that Bruce pursued him, and on his persistent +refusal to assent, slew him on the spot.</p> + +<p>A distinct English variation occurs in at least five of the +records. The Meaux Chronicle states that Bruce, on returning +to Scotland after the settlement of the Ordinance, +summoned the Scots earls and barons to Scone to consider +the affairs of the realm, and put forward his hereditary +claim. He received unanimous support, except that Comyn +stood by his oath of fealty to Edward, rejected Bruce's +claim with scorn, and at once left the council. The +council was adjourned to a future day at Dumfries. +Meantime Bruce sent Comyn a friendly invitation. Comyn +appeared at Dumfries and was cordially received by Bruce, +but still he maintained his objections, and again he left the +council. Bruce drew his sword and followed him, and +ran him through the body in the Church of the Friars +Minorites. The Cambridge Trinity College MS., it may +be noted, states that Bruce sent his two brothers to invite +Comyn to meet him at the 'Cordelers' of Dumfries; and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">31</a></span> +Geoffrey le Baker makes Bruce kill Comyn in the midst of +the magnates. But these councils may safely be set aside +as grounded on misconceptions.</p> + +<p>The English allegation of Bruce's purpose of murder +seems to invest with a special interest Blind Harry's casual +story, with its coincidences and discrepancies. Bruce, says +Harry, charged his brother Edward, whom he found at +Lochmaben on his arrival, to proceed next day with an +armed escort to Dalswinton, and to put Comyn to death, +if they found him; but they did not find him.</p> + +<p>On the fall of Comyn, his followers pressed forward and +blows were hotly exchanged. Comyn's uncle, Sir Robert, +assailed Bruce himself, but failed to pierce his armour +(which, the Meaux Chronicler says, he wore under his +clothes), and was cut down by Sir Christopher de Seton, +probably in the cloister, not in the church. Barbour adds +that 'many others of mickle main' were killed in the +mêlée; and the statement is amply confirmed.</p> + +<p>While this scene was enacting, the English Justiciars +were in session in the Castle. Thither Bruce and his +friends, having overpowered Comyn's adherents, at once +proceeded. The Justiciars had prudently barricaded the +doors, but, when Bruce called for fire, they instantly +surrendered. Bruce spared their lives, and allowed them +to pass over the Border without molestation. According +to Hemingburgh, it was only after Bruce had got possession +of the Castle that he learned that Comyn was still alive +after his first wound; whereupon, by order of Bruce, the +wounded man was dragged from the vestibule, where the +friars were tending him, and slain on the steps of the high +altar, which was bespattered with his blood.</p> + +<p>Comyn was slain (according to the usually accepted +date) on February 10. Less than two months later (April 5), +Edward affirmed that he had placed complete confidence +(<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">plenam fiduciam</i>) in Bruce. The profession may be accepted +as sincere, for it is on record, under date February 8 +(the order would have been made some days earlier), that +Edward remitted scutage due by Bruce on succession to +his father's estates. We may, therefore, put aside the +English part of the Fordun and Barbour story and refuse +to believe that Edward dallied with Comyn's allegations,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">32</a></span> +or was such a simpleton as to let Bruce keep possession +of the incriminating bond. But was there a bond at all? +It is generally accepted that Edward did hold in his hands +a bond of Bruce's; but this bond is usually taken to have +been the Lamberton indenture, which is supposed to have +come into Edward's possession through the instrumentality +of Comyn. Still, there is nothing to show that this indenture +was yet in Edward's hands. It may also be gravely +doubted whether Comyn would ever have entered into any +bond with Bruce. There is much significance in the silence +of the English records. Nor is there more than a very +slight English indication of any communication about +Bruce from Comyn to Edward. It is likely enough, +however, that Comyn informed Edward of Bruce's private +pushing of his claims; and it may be that the details of the +story of a bond were evolved on mere suppositions arising +out of the Bruce-Lamberton compact.</p> + +<p>The allegation that Bruce deliberately murdered Comyn +is the most serious matter. But the English writers do not +satisfy one that they had the means of seeing into Bruce's +mind; and the allegation may be reasonably regarded as +inference, not fact. There can scarcely be any doubt that +Bruce resumed the active furtherance of his claims on +observation of the declining health of Edward, but without +any immediate intention of a rupture. He could hardly +have found support enough to counterbalance the far-reaching +power of Comyn, to say nothing of the power +of Edward. Clearly it was of the very first importance +that he should, if possible, gain over Comyn. He may +have offered Comyn broad lands and high honours. But +to expect the practical heir of the Balliol claims to support +him was, on the face of it, all but hopeless; and to speak +of patriotism to Comyn would have been nothing less than +open insult. Comyn, of course, would stanchly reject +Bruce's overtures. Despite all his prudence, Bruce had +a hot and imperious temper; and Comyn's obstinacy—it +may be Comyn's frank speech—most probably broke down +his self-command. If it had been Bruce's deliberate purpose +to kill his rival, he would scarcely have chosen a +church for the scene, or have left the deed to be afterwards +completed either by others or by himself. The mere fact<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">33</a></span> +that he was totally unprepared for a struggle with Edward +tells almost conclusively against the theory of premeditation—unless +there was a very clearly compromising bond with +Comyn, which is wholly improbable. The bond with +Lamberton—the only bond that certainly existed—was +capable of easy explanation, and was a wholly insufficient +reason to urge him to murder a rival, whose adherents +would make up in bitterness what they lost in leadership.</p> + +<p>Nor is there any reason to believe that Lamberton was +implicated. True, he was charged, on his own bond, with +complicity in the deed. There still exist letters patent, +dated Scotland's Well, June 9, 1306, in which Lamberton +declares to Sir Aymer de Valence, then Edward's lieutenant +in Scotland, his anxious desire 'to defend himself in any +way the King or Council may devise against the charge +of having incurred any kind of guilt in the death of +Sir John Comyn or of Sir Robert his uncle, or in relation +to the war then begun'; and on August 9, at Newcastle, +he acknowledged the Cambuskenneth indenture. But +there is no necessary connection between the compact and +the crime; and it is in the last degree improbable that +Lamberton had any anticipation whatever of the Dumfries +tragedy. His sympathy with Bruce's rising is quite a +different consideration.</p> + +<div class="tb">*<span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span></div> + +<p>Having garrisoned Dumfries Castle, Bruce sent out his +messengers to raise adherents. The Galwegians having +refused to join him, he ravaged their lands; and he took +the castles of Tibbers, Durisdeer, and Ayr. But he was +not strong enough to keep the castles for more than a +very short period. After the first surprise, Comyn's men +asserted their superior force; and aid arrived from Carlisle. +The Lanercost chronicler records that Bruce pursued a Galwegian +noble and besieged him in a lake, but that the Carlisle +contingent raised the siege, compelling Bruce to burn +his machines and 'ships,' and take to flight. Probably +Carlaverock is meant.</p> + +<p>Leaving the local struggle to lieutenants, Bruce hastened +to Bishop Wishart in Glasgow. At Arickstone, in the upper +end of Annandale, Barbour says, he was joined by James +of Douglas, who had been staying with the Bishop of St.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">34</a></span> +Andrews—a young man destined to play a great part in +the history of Bruce. Bishop Wishart joyously received +his visitor, cheerfully broke his sixth oath of fealty to +Edward, pronounced absolution of Bruce for the murder +of Comyn, and produced coronation robes and a royal +banner. There was nothing half-hearted about the flexible +prelate. Already the country was in eager expectation, +and Bruce and the Bishop proceeded boldly to Scone.</p> + +<p>On March 27, 1306, in the Chapel Royal of Scone, the +immemorial scene of the inauguration of the Kings of the +Scots, Robert Bruce was crowned King. The ceremony +inevitably lacked certain of the traditional accessories that +strangely influenced the popular mind. The venerable +Stone of Destiny had been carried off by Edward ten +years before. The crown—if crown there had been—was +also gone; and the ancient royal robes—if such there +had been—were no longer available. The prescient Bishop, +however, had provided fresh robes, and a circlet of gold +was made to do duty for a crown. Still, there was lacking +an important functionary—the person whose office and +privilege it was to place the crown on the head of the +King. The proper official was the chief of the clan MacDuff; +but Duncan, Earl of Fife, was in wardship in England, +and again, as on the coronation of Balliol, arose the +difficulty of finding an efficacious substitute. No substitute +was forthcoming, and the coronation had to pass +with maimed rites.</p> + +<p>Two days later, however, this difficulty was dramatically +solved. Isabella, Countess of Buchan, and sister of the +Earl of Fife, had hastened south with an imposing retinue, +and appeared to claim the honour and privilege of her +house. A second coronation—not mentioned by the +Scottish writers—was held on March 29. The wife of a +Comyn, nearly related to the murdered Sir John, the +Countess yet performed the mystic function. It would be +an exceedingly interesting thing if one could now disentangle +the extraordinary complication of ideas and influences +involved in this remarkable ceremonial. The +subsequent punishment of the Countess by Edward continued +the romance of the occasion; and it may be added +here that, on March 20, 1306–7, Edward, at the instance of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">35</a></span> +his queen, pardoned one Geoffrey de Conyers for concealing +the coronet of gold with which King Robert was crowned.</p> + +<p>The coronation might have been expected to strike the +imagination of the Scots, and to rally the spirit that +cherished the memory of Wallace. Fordun asserts that +Bruce's friends in Scotland, as compared with his collective +foes, were but 'as a single drop compared with the waves +of the sea, or as a single grain of seed compared with the +multitudinous sand.' The hyperbole has a considerable +basis of fact. Bruce, indeed, was supported at his coronation +by the two chief prelates of Scotland, the Bishops of +St Andrews and Glasgow, and by the Abbot of Scone; by +strong-handed relatives—his four brothers, Edward, +Thomas, Alexander, and Nigel; his nephew, Thomas Randolph +of Strathdon (better known afterwards as Randolph, +Earl of Moray), and his brother-in-law, Sir Christopher de +Seton (husband of his sister Christian); by the Earls of +Lennox, Athol, and Errol; and by such valorous men as +James de Douglas, Hugh de la Haye (brother of Errol), +David Barclay of Cairns, Alexander, brother of Sir Simon +Fraser, Walter de Somerville of Carnwath, David de +Inchmartin, Robert Boyd, and Robert Fleming. Apart +from the episcopal influence, however, the array is not very +imposing. Yet how vastly superior to the meagre beginnings +of Wallace! Bruce, indeed, lacked one vital source +of strength that his great predecessor had—intimate association +and sympathy with the common folk; but, on the +other hand, he was admitted, except by the Comyn interest, +to be the legitimate sovereign, and 'is not the King's name +twenty thousand names?' And so it would have been but +for his inglorious record. It is only the servile adulation +of later writers that has pictured Bruce as animated by +patriotism. He was simply a great Anglo-Norman baron +in quest of aggrandizement; and it took many years to +satisfy the people generally that their interests were safe in +his keeping. But he was a man with deep reserves of +strength, freed at last from the paralysis of worldly prudence +by a sudden shock, and compelled to defend his crown +and his life with his back to the wall. Happily, if only +incidentally, such self-defence involved the championship +of the independence of Scotland.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">36</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">DEFEAT AND DISASTER: METHVEN AND KILDRUMMY</span></h2> + +<p>The new King buckled to his task with fiery energy. 'All +the English' had not, though many of them had, 'returned +to their own land'; and Bruce instantly issued a proclamation +requiring those that remained to follow those that had +gone. According to the Meaux chronicler, he proceeded +to expel them; but the particular acts are not recorded. +At the same time he imperiously insisted on the submission +of such Scots as had not yet joined him. He threw the +Perth bailies into prison, and required them, on pain of +death, to pay up £54 of the King's Whitsunday rents. A +detailed example of his procedure remains in the memorial +of exculpation addressed by Malise, Earl of Strathearn, to +Edward. The Earl alleges that, on Monday, the day after +the coronation, Bruce sent to him the Abbot of Inchaffray, +requiring him to repair forthwith to his presence to perform +homage and fealty. On his refusal, Bruce, with the Earl of +Athol, entered Strathearn in force, occupied Foulis, and +despatched another summons, with a safe conduct, to the +Earl, who took counsel with his followers in the wood of +Crieff. Bruce's messenger seems to have been Sir Malcolm +de Inverpeffry, who had been Edward's sheriff of Clackmannan +and Auchterarder, and had been one of the first to +go over to Bruce. Taking the advice of Sir Malcolm and +of his own friends, he went to Bruce, but still he refused to +comply with the peremptory demand of submission. Next +day, he again met Bruce by appointment at Muthill. In +the course of the interview, Athol, who had been stung by +a sharp home thrust of Strathearn's, urged Bruce to break +his promise of safe conduct and give the Earl into custody, +while Athol's men should go and ravage his lands. Strathearn +was taken to Inchmalcolm, where he steadily maintained +his refusal. Sir Robert de Boyd thereupon advised<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">37</a></span> +Bruce to cut off his head and grant away his lands, and to +do the like to all others afflicted with such scruples. Strathearn +then gave way, and they let him go. The story may +be coloured to suit Strathearn's new difficulties, but it may +at least be taken as an indication of Bruce's resolute, yet +prudent, action.</p> + +<p>The memorial further shows that Strathearn was again at +issue with Bruce before the battle of Methven. Bruce sent +him a letter, he says, directing him to bring his power to +Calder; but, instead of obeying the order, he communicated +the letter to Sir Aymer de Valence, then at Perth, +and prepared to follow with his men. Just as he was +starting, Bruce came upon him, laid siege to the place +where he was, and ravaged his country. At an interview, +Strathearn flatly refused to join Bruce in an attack on +Valence; and Bruce had to let him go recalcitrant and +unpunished, for the sake of the hostages in the hands of +Strathearn's party.</p> + +<p>The news of Bruce's revolt and the death of Comyn roused +Edward into full martial vigour. He at once despatched +judicious instructions to his officers in Scotland and on +the Borders. In March he was directing military supplies +to be accumulated at Berwick; and in the beginning of +April he commanded the Irish authorities to divert supplies +destined for Ayr to Skinburness, and to send them 'with +the utmost haste,' giving 'orders to the seamen to keep the +high seas and not to approach the ports of Ayr or Galloway +on any account.' On April 5 he issued orders for the +immediate muster of the forces of the northern counties at +the summons of Valence and Percy.</p> + +<p>Having set his army in motion, Edward held a great +feast at Westminster at Whitsuntide. By proclamation +he invited all such youths as had a hereditary claim to +knighthood, and such as had the means to campaign, +to come and receive knighthood along with the Prince +of Wales. In the middle of April he had despatched +his clerks to St Botolph's Fair, with orders to his sheriffs +and other lieges of Southampton and Wilts to aid them +'in purchasing 80 cloths of scarlet and other colours, +2000 ells of linen cloth, 4000 ells of canvas, 30 +pieces of wax, and 20 boillones of almonds,' for the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">38</a></span> +outfit and entertainment of the new knights. The +Royal Palace could not contain the visitors. The +Prince and the more noble of the candidates kept vigil +in Westminster Abbey; the rest made shift to keep +vigil in the Temple. Next day the King knighted the +Prince, and made him Duke of Aquitaine. Thereupon +the Prince went to Westminster Abbey and conferred +knighthood upon his companions. The crush before the +high altar was so severe that two knights died and many +fainted; and the Prince ordered in a ring of war-horses +to fence off his knights from the crowd. The number +of new knights may be taken roundly at three hundred.</p> + +<p>Then followed a remarkable ceremony. As the King +and the knights sat at table, there entered a splendid +procession, attended by a train of minstrels, in the midst +of which were borne two swans in golden nets amid gilt +reeds, 'a lovely spectacle to the beholders.' On seeing +them, the King chivalrously vowed a vow to God and +to the swans—emblems of purity and faith—that he would +go to Scotland, and, alive or dead, avenge the outrage +to Holy Church, the death of Comyn, and the broken +faith of the Scots. Turning to the Prince and the nobles, +he adjured them by their fealty that, if he should die +before accomplishing his vow, they should carry his body +with them in the war, and not bury it 'till the Lord gave +victory and triumph' over the perfidious Bruce and the +perjured Scots. One and all, they engaged their faith by +the same vow. Trevet adds that Edward further vowed +that, when the war in Scotland was successfully ended, he +would never more bear arms against Christian men, but +would direct his steps to the Holy Land and never return +thence. 'Never in Britain, since God was born,' says +Langtoft, 'was there such nobleness in towns or in cities, +except Caerleon in ancient times, when Sir Arthur the +King was crowned there.'</p> + +<p>The brilliant ceremony over, the Prince set out for +Carlisle, where his army was ordered to be in readiness on +July 8. He was accompanied by a large number of his +new-made knights. The King was to follow by slow stages.</p> + +<p>Amidst the pomp of the gallant ceremonial, Edward's +mind was keenly bent upon the business of the expedition.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">39</a></span> +Writing to Valence on May 24, he desires 'that some +good exploit be done, if possible, before his arrival.' Two +days later (May 26), he is delighted to hear that Valence, +then at Berwick, is ready to operate against the enemy, +and urges him to strike at them as often as possible, and +in concert with the forces at Carlisle. As regards 'the +request by some for a safe-conduct for the Bishop of +St Andrews,' Valence, he orders, 'will neither give, nor +allow any of his people to give such.' The Bishop, if he +pleases, may come to the King's faith, and receive his +deserts. Let Valence take the utmost pains to secure the +Bishop's person, and also the person of the Bishop of +Glasgow; and let him send frequent news of his doings.</p> + +<p>Valence had a stroke of luck. On June 8, Edward 'is +very much pleased' to learn from him 'that the Bishop of +Glasgow is taken, and will soon be sent to him.' The +Bishop had been taken in arms on the recapture of Cupar +Castle by the English. A week later (June 16), Edward +informs Valence that 'he is almost as much pleased as if +it had been the Earl of Carrick,' and directs him to send +the Bishop 'well guarded' to Berwick, 'having no regard +to his estate of prelate or clerk.' The order was executed +without any undue tenderness to the Bishop. The Bishop +of St Andrews, however, was still at large. 'I understand +from many,' wrote Edward to Valence in the letter of +June 8, 'that the Bishop of St Andrews has done me +all the mischief in his power, for, though chief of the +Guardians of Scotland appointed by me, he has joined +my enemies.'</p> + +<p>As yet the edge of Edward's appetite was but whetted. +On June 12, he 'is well pleased to hear that Valence has +burned Sir Simon Fraser's lands in Selkirk Forest,' and +commands him 'to do the same to all enemies on his +march, including those who turned against him in this +war of the Earl of Carrick, and have since come to his +peace as enemies and not yet guaranteed; and to burn, +destroy, and waste their houses, lands, and goods in such +wise that Sir Simon and others may have no refuge with +them as heretofore.' At the same time, Valence is to +spare and honour the loyal, and in particular to compliment +the foresters of Selkirk on their loyal and painful<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">40</a></span> +service. In successive letters he reiterates the caution +to beware of surprise and treason, and his anxiety for +constant news.</p> + +<p>Still more vindictive is his tone on June 19. He +commands Valence to burn, destroy, and strip the lands +and gardens of Sir Michael de Wemyss's manors, 'as +he has found nor good speech nor good service in him,' +and this for an example to others. Likewise, to do the +same, or worse, if possible, to the lands and possessions +of Sir Gilbert de la Haye, to whom the King did great +courtesy when he was last in London, but now finds he +is a traitor': the King will make up the loss to the +persons to whom he has granted his lands!</p> + +<p>Meantime the Pope made his voice heard. On May 6, +he had written to Edward, promising to send a nuncio to +deal with the Bishop of Glasgow and others; and on May +11, he had strongly denounced to the Archbishop of York +the assumption of the Bishop, desiring him to order the +culprit peremptorily to come to his Holiness at Bordeaux. +The Archbishop replied that the Bishop had been captured +in arms, and that the King thought it inexpedient to serve +the citation on his prisoner, but would send envoys with +explanations. On June 18, the Pope addressed a bull to +the Archbishop of York and the Bishop of Carlisle directing +them to excommunicate Bruce and his adherents, and +to lay their lands, castles, and towns under ecclesiastical +interdict till they should purge their offence. Already, on +June 5, according to the London Annalist, the Archdeacons +of Middlesex and Colchester had formally excommunicated +Bruce and three other knights at St Paul's for the death of +Comyn.</p> + +<p>However the sacrilegious deed at Dumfries may have +affected the attitude of Scotsmen generally to Bruce, it did +not produce revulsion in the minds of the more ardent +patriots, any more than in the minds of Bruce's personal +friends. Yet not only the powerful Comyn interest, but also +a very large section of the rest of the population, adhered, +formally at least, to the English cause. The particular +movements of Bruce are not on record; but it appears that +his adherents were pressing Sir Alexander de Abernethy +in Forfar Castle, and that Irish as well as Scots allies were<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">41</a></span> +active in Fife and Gowrie. The foresters of Selkirk, as +we have seen, had stood by Edward, and apparently had +suffered not a little for their fidelity. Hemingburgh says +Bruce 'did great wonders': undoubtedly the impression +is that he must have been fighting a strenuous uphill +battle. The great mass of the nation, however, was waiting +for more definite developments.</p> + +<p>In June, Sir Aymer de Valence had advanced from +Berwick to Perth. In his company were several prominent +Scots—Sir John de Mowbray, Sir Ingram de Umfraville, +Sir Alexander de Abernethy, Sir Adam de Gordon, +Sir David de Brechin, and others that leant to Comyn. +He had received to the peace some complaisant Scots +whose lands or dwellings lay on his northward route. +Bruce probably kept him under observation, retiring before +him beyond the Forth, and not attempting to bar his progress +to Perth.</p> + +<p>On June 25, Bruce, no doubt reinforced, appeared before +the walls of Perth, and challenged Sir Aymer to come out +and fight him, or else to surrender. Hemingburgh assigns +to Valence only 300 men-at-arms and some foot, a smaller +force, he says, than Bruce had; but it is most unlikely that +Valence was not the stronger, though possibly not by 1500 +men, as Barbour alleges. Valence seems to have been +ready to accept Bruce's challenge, but to have been dissuaded +by his Scots friends. Umfraville, says Barbour, +advised him to promise battle on the morrow, but to attack +that night when the Scots were off guard in reliance on his +promise. Bruce—'too credulous,' says Hemingburgh—accepted +the promise. He was not in a position to establish +a siege, and he retired to Methven Wood. His main +body set about preparing food, and disposed themselves at +ease, while parties went out to forage. In the dusk of the +evening, Valence issued from Perth and took Bruce by +surprise. It is not to be supposed, as the chroniclers +narrate, that Bruce was so inexperienced as to allow his +men to lie in careless unreadiness: no doubt many of +them would have laid aside their arms; but the very fact +that his knights at least fought with loose linen tunics over +their armour to hide their distinctive arms would seem to +show that they at any rate were prepared. Still they did<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">42</a></span> +not expect attack. They promptly rallied, however, and +met with vigour the sudden and furious onset. Bruce, +keenly realising the importance of the issue, bore himself +with splendid valour. Before his fierce charge, the enemy +gave way; and, Langtoft says, he killed Valence's charger. +Thrice was he unhorsed himself, and thrice remounted by +Sir Simon Fraser. According to Sir Thomas Gray, he was +taken prisoner by John de Haliburton, who let him go the +moment he recognised him. Barbour tells how he was +hard beset by Sir Philip de Mowbray, and was rescued by +Sir Christopher de Seton. But the day was going against +him, and it was in vain that he made a supreme effort to +rally his men. He was compelled to retreat. Barbour +asserts that the English were too wearied to pursue, and +retired within the walls of Perth with their prisoners, keeping +there in fear of the approach of Bruce; but it seems far +more likely, as Langtoft relates, that they kept up the pursuit +'for many hours.' The statement of Hemingburgh +and others that the English pursued Bruce to Cantyre, and +besieged and took a castle there, mistakenly supposing him +to be in it, is evidently a misconception, and a confusion +of Dunaverty with Kildrummy.</p> + +<p>Bruce lost comparatively few men in the battle—the +7000 of the Meaux chronicle need not be considered—but +a number of his ablest supporters were taken prisoners, +notably Thomas Randolph, his nephew, Sir Alexander +Fraser, Sir David Barclay, Sir Hugh de la Haye, Sir David +de Inchmartin, and Sir John de Somerville. The Bishop +of St Andrews had surrendered to Valence before the battle, +but had taken care to send his household to fight for Bruce. +His calculation is said to have been 'that if the Scots beat +the English they would rescue him as a man taken by force +for lack of protection, whereas, if the English won the day, +they would mercifully regard him as having been abandoned +by his household, as not consenting to their acts.' But +this looks like a speculation of the chronicler's. Valence +displayed humane consideration for his prisoners, all the +more honourable as he had not yet received Edward's +letter of June 28, modifying his previous bloodthirsty +orders.</p> + +<p>After the defeat, Bruce's party broke up into several<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">43</a></span> +groups. Sir Simon Fraser was captured at Kirkincliffe, +near Stirling. Sir Christopher de Seton was taken at +Lochore Castle in Fife. The Earl of Lennox made for +his own fastnesses. Bruce himself proceeded northwards +to Aberdeen. Barbour says he had about 500 followers, +the most prominent of whom were his brother Sir Edward, +the Earls of Athol and Errol, Sir William Barondoun, +James of Douglas, and Sir Nigel Campbell. He kept +to the high ground, not venturing to the plains, for the +population had outwardly passed to the English peace +again. Barbour tells pitifully how the fugitives' clothes +and shoon were riven and rent before they reached Aberdeen. +Here they were met by Nigel Bruce, the Queen, +and other ladies; and here Bruce rested his company 'a +good while.'</p> + +<p>The English, however, followed up, and Bruce was +unable to show fight. The whole party, therefore, took +to the hills again. The exact date is not recorded; but +we know that Valence was at Aberdeen on August 3. +The very next day (August 4) a painful scene was enacted +at Newcastle. Fifteen Scots, all prisoners from +Methven, including Sir David de Inchmartin, Sir John de +Cambhou, Sir John de Somerville, Sir Ralph de Heriz, +and Sir Alexander Scrymgeour, were arraigned before +nine justices, whose instructions directed that 'judgment +be pronounced as ordained, and none of them be allowed +to answer.' They were all hanged. At the same time, +John de Seton, who had been taken in Tibbers Castle, +which he was holding for Bruce, and who had been +present with Bruce at the death of Comyn, and at the +capture of Dumfries Castle, of which Sir Richard Siward +of Tibbers was constable, was condemned, drawn, and +hanged. It appears to have been due to the earnest +intervention of Sir Adam de Gordon that Randolph—as +we shall henceforth call Thomas Randolph (<i>Thomas +Ranulphi</i>) Bruce's nephew, later Earl of Moray—was +spared.</p> + +<p>Bruce and his followers suffered serious privations in +the hill country. Barbour engagingly tells how Douglas +especially exerted himself in hunting and fishing, and, as +became a chivalrous youth hardly out of his teens, served<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">44</a></span> +indefatigably the ladies as well as his lord. The party +pushed south-westwards by 'the head of the Tay.' Eventually, +they found themselves face to face with the Lord of +Lorn, Alexander MacDougal, a 'deadly enemy to the King,' +says Barbour, 'for the sake of his uncle John Comyn.' +Alexander was really Lord of Argyll, and had married +Comyn's third daughter; it was his son, John of Lorn, +whose uncle Comyn was, and Barbour may mean John. +Alexander is said to have had over 1000 men, with the +chiefs of Argyll as his lieutenants. Bruce was in no case +for battle, but he was encouraged, in his necessity, by +the nature of the ground, and put on a bold front. A +stern combat ensued at Dalry—the 'Kings Field'—in +Strathfillan, near Tyndrum. Fordun gives the date August +11; and, if this be correct, Barbour has misplaced the +episode. The men of Lorn, wielding their great pole-axes +on foot, did serious execution upon Bruce's horses; +and they wounded badly some of his men, including +Douglas and Sir Gilbert de la Haye. Bruce satisfied +himself by a determined charge that further contest would +cost him too many men, and, forming close, he retreated +steadily, protecting his rear in person so vigilantly and +boldly that none of the Lorns durst advance from the +main body.</p> + +<p>The wrath of Lorn incited two brothers named MacIndrosser—that +is, sons of Durward (the Doorkeeper) as +Barbour explains—to perform an oath they had sworn to +slay Bruce. This oath may possibly be connected with +the fact that Alan Durward, the celebrated Justiciar of +Scotland, had vainly endeavoured to get his family claims +to the throne forwarded by the legitimation of his daughters, +his wife being an illegitimate daughter of Alexander II. +Joined by a third man—possibly the MacKeoch of the +Lorn tradition—they rushed on Bruce in a narrow pass—perhaps +between Loch Dochart and Ben More—where +the hill rose so sheer from the water that he had barely +room to turn his horse. One caught his bridle, but Bruce +instantly shore off his arm. Another had seized his leg +and stirrup; but Bruce rose in his stirrups and spurred his +horse, throwing down his adversary, who still grimly maintained +his grip. The third meanwhile had scrambled up<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">45</a></span> +the incline and jumped on Bruce's horse behind him; but +Bruce at once dragged him forward and clove his head. +He then struck down the man at his stirrup. This exploit +cowed the Lorns. Barbour glorifies Bruce by citing the +admiring comment of MacNaughton, a Baron of Cowal. +'You seem to enjoy our discomfiture,' said Lorn angrily. +'No,' replied MacNaughton; 'but never did I hear tell of +such a feat, and one should honour chivalry whether in +friend or in foe.' Bruce rode after his men, and Lorn +retired in chagrin. Barbour, it will be observed, makes no +mention of a personal encounter between Bruce and Lorn, +or of the capture of the famous Brooch of Lorn,</p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="iq">'Wrought and chased with fair device,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Studded fair with gems of price.'<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p>Bruce, according to Barbour, now applied himself to +comfort his party, though probably he was less versed +than the devoted Archdeacon in historical examples +of courage in despair. There was need for comfort; +things were going rapidly from bad to worse. The ladies +began to fail. And not only the ladies, but some of the +harder sex: the Earl of Athol, Barbour says, could hold +out no longer on any terms. A council of war was called, +with the result that Bruce himself, with some 200 of the +tougher men, took to the higher hills, and Sir Nigel Bruce, +taking all the horses, even the King's, essayed to conduct +the Queen and the other ladies, as well as the more exhausted +of the men, back to the Aberdeenshire stronghold +of Kildrummy.</p> + +<p>Sir Nigel reached Kildrummy in safety. The castle +was well provisioned, and was deemed impregnable. It +had not been taken by Valence in early August, when +he 'well settled affairs beyond the Mounth, and appointed +warders there.' Sir Nigel was soon besieged, probably by +the Prince of Wales. A vigorous attack was met by a +spirited defence, the besieged frequently sallying and +fighting at the outworks. There was hardly time for the +besiegers to despair of success, as Barbour says they did, +when a traitor set fire to the store of corn heaped up in the +castle hall, involving the place in flames, and driving the +garrison to the battlements. The English seized their<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">46</a></span> +opportunity and attacked as closely as the fire permitted, +but they were gallantly repelled. The entrance gate, +though burnt, is said to have been so hot that they could +not enter. They accordingly waited till the morrow. The +defenders, with great exertion, managed to block up the +gate overnight. At daybreak, the attack was renewed, with +all the energy of certain hope. The besieged, however, +having neither food nor fuel, recognised that further defence +was impossible, and surrendered at discretion. The +precise date is not clear. A calendered letter, anonymous, +dated September 13, states that 'Kildrummy was lately +taken by the Prince'; but, if this date be correct, it seems +strange that Edward, writing on September 22, should +not say more than that 'all is going well at Kildrummy +Castle.'</p> + +<p>The prisoners included Sir Nigel Bruce, Sir Robert de +Boyd, Sir Alexander de Lindsay, 'and other traitors, and +many knights and others.' Hemingburgh mentions the +Queen; but Barbour and Fordun relate that she and the +Princess Marjory, in order to escape the siege, had been +escorted to the sanctuary of St Duthac at Tain, where they +were taken by the Earl of Ross, who delivered them to +Edward. It may be incidentally noted that some two years +afterwards (October 31, 1308), the Earl of Ross did fealty +and homage to King Robert at Auldearn, and was reinstated +in his lands.</p> + +<p>The fate of the more important prisoners demands particular +notice. Most of the captives were interned in English +castles; but</p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="iq">'Some they ransomed, some they slew,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And some they hanged, and some they drew.'<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p>The Queen was sent to stay at the manor of Burstwick, +in Holderness, Yorkshire. Edward certainly meant to +treat her handsomely. His directions were that she should +have 'a waiting-woman and a maid-servant, advanced in +life, sedate, and of good conversation; a butler, two man-servants, +and a foot-boy for her chamber, sober and not +riotous, to make her bed; three greyhounds, when she +inclined to hunt; venison, fish, and the "fairest house in +the manor."' Hemingburgh gives two reasons. First, her +father, the Red Earl of Ulster, had proved faithful to him.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">47</a></span> +Second, he was pleased with a reported saying of hers +on the coronation of her husband. 'Rejoice now, my +consort,' Bruce said, 'for you have been made a Queen, +and I a King.' 'I fear, Sir,' she replied, 'we have been +made King and Queen after the fashion of children in +summer games.' Other chroniclers give the story with +slight variation. In a letter, without date, but apparently +belonging to next year, she complains to Edward 'that, +though he had commanded his bailiffs of Holderness to see +herself and her attendants honourably sustained, yet they +neither furnish attire for her person or her head, nor a bed, +nor furniture of her chambers, saving only a robe of three +"garmentz" yearly, and for her servants one robe each for +everything'; and she prays him 'to order amendment of +her condition, and that her servants be paid for their labour, +that she may not be neglected, or that she may have a yearly +sum allowed by the King for her maintenance.' In autumn +1310, she was at Bistelesham; in 1311–12, at Windsor Castle; +in autumn 1312, at Shaftesbury; in 1313, at Barking Abbey; +in 1313–14, at Rochester Castle; in October 1314, at +Carlisle Castle, on her way back to Scotland, in consequence +of Bannockburn.</p> + +<p>Marjory, Bruce's daughter, had first been destined to +a 'cage' in the Tower of London, but was placed by +Sir Henry de Percy in the Priory of Watton in Yorkshire. +She returned to Scotland with the Queen.</p> + +<p>Mary Bruce, sister of the King, and wife of Sir Nigel +Campbell, was kept first in Roxburgh Castle, in a 'cage,' +and then at Newcastle till June 25, 1312, when she was +probably exchanged.</p> + +<p>Christian Bruce, another sister of the King, and widow +of Sir Christopher de Seton, was relegated to the Priory +of Sixhill, in Lincolnshire, whence she was released on +July 18, 1314, and returned with the Queen.</p> + +<p>The Countess of Buchan was put in a 'cage' in Berwick +Castle. The Earl, it is said, wanted to kill her, but Edward +delivered judgment thus: 'As she did not strike with the +sword, she shall not perish by the sword; but, because of +the unlawful coronation she performed, let her be closely confined +in a stone-and-iron chamber, fashioned in the form of a +crown, and suspended at Berwick in the open air outside<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">48</a></span> +the castle, so that she may be presented, alive and dead, a +spectacle to passers-by and an everlasting reproach.' In +fact, she was placed in a room—or rather an erection of +three storeys or rooms—of stout lattice-work in a turret of +the castle. She was to be kept so strictly that 'she shall +speak to no one, and that neither man nor woman of the +nation of Scotland, nor other, shall approach her,' except +her keeper and her immediate attendants. The 'cage' +was simply an arrangement for 'straiter custody,' though +but rarely judged necessary in the case of ladies. About +a year later, the ex-Constable of Bristol Castle was reimbursed +certain expenditure, part of which was for +'making a wooden cage bound with iron in the said +house for the straiter custody of Owen, son of David ap +Griffith, a prisoner, shut therein at night.'</p> + +<p>A harder fate awaited the foremost knightly defenders +of Kildrummy. Sir Nigel Bruce and several others were +drawn, hanged, and beheaded at Berwick. The handsome +person and gallant bearing of the youthful knight excited +general sympathy and regret.</p> + +<p>The Earl of Athol had escaped from Kildrummy and +taken to sea, but was driven back by contrary winds and +took refuge in a church, where he was captured—'the news +whereof eased the King's pain.' In the end of October he +was taken to London, and tried and condemned. When +friends interceded for him, and urged his royal blood, 'The +higher the rank,' said Edward, 'the worse the fall; hang +him higher than the rest.' In virtue of his royal blood he +was not drawn, but he was hanged fifty feet high (twenty +feet higher than others), taken down half-dead, beheaded +and burnt, and his head was set on London Bridge, again +higher than the rest.</p> + +<p>Sir Christopher de Seton had been taken at Lochore +(Hemingburgh, Trevet)—if not at Kildrummy (Gray)—betrayed, +says Barbour, by MacNab, 'a man of his own +household,' 'a disciple of Judas.' 'In hell condemnèd +mot he be!' prays the good Archdeacon. He was taken +to Dumfries, in consideration of the part he played at +the death of Comyn, and there (not, as Barbour says, at +London) he was drawn, hanged, and beheaded. He was +only twenty-eight years of age.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">49</a></span> +Sir Simon Fraser had been captured about August 24, +by Sir David de Brechin, near Stirling, and conducted to +London on September 6. He was tried and condemned, +drawn, hanged, and beheaded; his body, having been rehung +on the gallows for twenty days, was burnt; and his +head was carried, with the music of horns, to London +Bridge, and placed near the head of Wallace. Fraser, +since turning patriot, had extorted the admiration of foes +and friends alike. 'In him,' says Langtoft, 'through his +falseness, perished much worth.' 'The imprisoned Scots +nobles,' says another English chronicler, 'declared he +could be neither beaten nor taken, and thought the +Scots could not be conquered while he was alive. +So much did they believe in him that Sir Herbert de +Morham, handsomest and tallest of Scotsmen, a prisoner +in the Tower, offered his head to the King to be cut off +the day Simon was captured.' Sir Herbert's squire, Thomas +du Bois, joined in his master's confident wager. Both of +them were beheaded on September 7, the day after Sir +Simon's arrival at the Tower.</p> + +<p>But Edward dared not imbrue his hands in the blood of +great churchmen. The Bishops of St Andrews and Glasgow +and the Abbot of Scone were conducted to Newcastle-on-Tyne +in the warlike guise in which they are said to have +been taken. From Newcastle (August 10) they were led +by stages, still traceable, to their separate places of confinement—the +castles of Winchester, Porchester, and Mere. +On the way they were not allowed to communicate with +each other, or with anyone else, 'excepting their keepers +only'; and, on arrival at their several destinations, they +were loaded with irons. Edward was keenly anxious to +get hold of the Bishop of Moray also, whom he believed—no +doubt wrongly—to have been a party to the murder +of Comyn, but who certainly adhered to Bruce. The +Bishop, however, had fled to Orkney, and for a twelvemonth +left Edward to negotiate with the King of Norway +for his surrender.</p> + +<p>The Bishop of St Andrews had sagaciously surrendered +to Valence four or five days before Methven. He had +already (June 9) warmly repudiated the charge of complicity +in the death of Comyn. On August 9, he was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">50</a></span> +severely examined at Newcastle. Why had he concealed +his bond with Bruce when he was admitted of the Council +at Sheen? He had 'entirely forgotten' it—which is not +quite improbable, for, on the face of it at all events, and +possibly in fact, it related to the immediate contingencies +of eighteen months back. Why did he hasten to Bruce's +coronation? He went to see him 'on account of grievous +threats against his person and substance, and for no other +reason'—but he was not so stiff as the Earl of Strathearn. +Neither these nor his further answers are satisfactory. +Already he was declaring himself 'heartily sorry.' On +June 1, 1308, on an order dated May 23, he was released +from Winchester Castle, where he had lain from August +24, 1306, but he was taken bound to remain within the +county of Northampton. At Northampton, on August 11, +he swore fealty to Edward in abject terms, and made oath +to remain within the bounds of the bishopric of Durham. +He was creeping northwards. The Pope sent a strong +remonstrance in his favour, but Edward II. had anticipated +it by the Bishop's release. On February 16, 1309–10, the +Bishop figures at the head of a commission of seven, invested, +on the urgency of the Pope, with full powers to +treat with Bruce for a cessation of hostilities. On July 24, +1311, he was back in Scotland, and Edward writes to the +Pope excusing his absence from a General Council holden +at Vienna, on the ground that 'he is much needed to give +right direction to the minds of Scotsmen, and in these +days no one's exhortations are more readily acquiesced +in.' Indeed, 'we have laid upon him various arduous +tasks touching the state of the country, and especially +its tranquillity.' Besides, 'his absence would be a danger +to souls.' In a second letter of excuse, on December 4, +Edward testifies emphatically to his continued fidelity. +About two years later, November 30, 1313, the Bishop +was still so much in favour that Edward dispatched him +on an embassy to the King of France. On September 25, +1314, he 'is going abroad on business of his own, by our +leave'; which implies his final release as a consequence of +Bannockburn.</p> + +<p>The Bishop of Glasgow was more strictly dealt with. +Apparently about the date of his internment in Porchester<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">51</a></span> +Castle (say August 25, 1306), he prayed the King, 'for +God and for charity and the salvation of his soul, to allow +him to remain in England within certain bounds at the +King's will, on such surety as the King may demand, +till the rising of the Scots be entirely put down.' On +December 1, 1308, Edward II. delivered him to Arnaud, +Bishop of Poitiers, to be taken to the Pope; but three +days later he wrote to his Holiness, and to a number of +cardinals, that the Bishop's crimes forbade any hope that +he could be allowed to return to Scotland. He set forth +at large the supreme wickedness of the Bishop, 'the sower +of universal discord,' the traitor, the sixfold perjurer, the +ecclesiastic taken in arms; 'not a pacific overseer, but a +belligerent; not a Levite of the altar, but a horsed warrior, +taking to himself a shield for a diocese, a sword for a stole, +a corslet for an alb, a helmet for a mitre, a spear for a +pastoral staff.' Begging the Pope on no account to permit +the return of the Bishop to Scotland, or even 'elsewhere +within the King's power,' he recommends the appointment +of Master Stephen de Segrave, Professor of Canon Law +and Dean of Glasgow, to the western bishopric. To the +Pope the Bishop went; and with the Pope he apparently +remained for two years, for in January 1310–11, Edward +wrote from Berwick to his Chancellor informing him that +he had heard that the Bishop was 'busy suing his deliverance +at the Court of Rome,' and commanding him, 'in +concert with the Earl of Lincoln, the Lieutenant and +Guardian, and the Treasurer of Scotland, to issue letters +under the Great Seal to the Pope, and to the Cardinals +named in the enclosed list, urgently opposing the Bishop's +restoration either to his office or to his country, and pointing +out his evil bearing (<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">mavoys port</i>), and his repeated +violation of his oath, and anything else likely to induce +the Pope to refuse him leave even to return to Scotland.' +These representations appear to have stayed the Pope's +hand; and again, on April 23, Edward repeated with +especial urgency his request for the supersession of the +Bishop by Master Stephen de Segrave. Late in 1313, +the Bishop was sent back to Edward 'to be detained by +the King at pleasure till Scotland was recovered'; and +Edward, on November 20, committed him to the charge of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">52</a></span> +the Prior of Ely, 'to remain at the Priory at his own expenses, +and not to go forth except for the purpose of +taking the air, under sufficient escort.' On July 18, 1314, +Edward ordered him to be brought to York, where he +joined Bruce's Queen and other Scots prisoners, with +whom he was sent to Carlisle on October 2, and thence +to Scotland. Physically, however, he was worn out; he +had become totally blind. He survived his restoration +but two years, dying in 1317. It stands to the credit of +Bruce that he always retained a strong feeling of gratitude +and sympathy for the patriotic, flexible, gallant, and much +enduring Bishop.</p> + +<p>The campaign of the east was over. On October 4, +Edward conferred on Sir Aymer de Valence lands and +official honours in the shires of Peebles and Selkirk; and, +on October 7, he made him keeper of the castle and forest +of Jedburgh. On October 23, Edward received the +homage and fealty of James, Steward of Scotland, and +restored to him his lands. Of course the English lands +and possessions of Bruce and all his adherents were distributed +as rewards to the deserving officers and the +favourites of the conqueror. The active opposition to +the English in Scotland was smothered in blood, except +in the parts of Galloway and Carrick.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">53</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_V" id="CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">THE KING IN EXILE</span></h2> + +<p>When Sir Nigel Bruce parted for the last time with his +brother and passed on his fated way to Kildrummy, the +King was left with some two hundred men, all on foot. +He kept steadily to the hills, where he suffered severely +from hunger, cold, and wet, till at last he resolved to +make southward to Cantyre. Despatching Sir Nigel +Campbell, whose kinsmen dwelt in these parts, to obtain +boats and victuals, and to meet the party 'at the sea'—either +on Loch Long or on the Firth of Clyde—Bruce, +says Barbour, struck for Loch Lomond, probably about +Rowardennan. Here he could find no boats, and either +way round was long and beset with foes. At last Douglas +discovered a sunken boat, capable of holding but three +men. In the course of a night and a day the party were +ferried over, two by two, a few of them, however, swimming +'with fardel on back.' Meanwhile Bruce cheered their +drooping spirits by reading from the old romance how +Fierabras was overcome by the right doughty Oliver, and +how the Twelve (Eleven) Peers held out in Aigremont +against Lawyne (Laban, Balan) till they were delivered by +Charlemagne.</p> + +<p>The most pressing difficulty was lack of food. Presently, +however, this was relieved by the Earl of Lennox, who had +noted the sound of the King's horn and joyfully hastened +to him. Shortly Sir Nigel returned with boats and food +in abundance. Bruce and his friends embarked. Barbour +has a dramatic story how Lennox made delay in starting, +how his boat was pursued—probably by Lorn's men—and +how he escaped by throwing overboard his belongings, +which the enemy stopped to appropriate. The boats +ran down the Firth and safely landed the party in Cantyre.</p> + +<p>Here Bruce received a friendly welcome from Angus +of Islay, Lord of Cantyre, who placed at his disposal the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">54</a></span> +rock fortress of Dunaverty. He entertained suspicions of +treachery, however, and stayed only three days. Then, +with all his following, he passed over to the island of +Rathlin, an exile from his kingdom.</p> + +<p>Such is Barbour's story. Taking it, meantime, as it +stands, let us see what the English had been doing in the +south-west. The details of operation are very scanty. +Percy, the King's lieutenant on the western March, had +exerted himself during June, July and August in fortifying +and provisioning the castles. Lochmaben Castle fell on +July 11, and Prince Edward felt himself free to go to +Valence at Perth a few days later, and to carry through +the siege of Kildrummy by the middle of September. +He seems to have acted with more zeal than prudence. +Rishanger says he took 'such vengeance that he spared +neither sex nor age; towns, too, and hamlets, wherever he +came he set on fire, and he mercilessly devastated the +country.' This conduct 'is said to have gravely displeased +the King his father, who chid him severely.' The King +had moved northwards by slow stages, borne in a litter on +horseback. It was September 29 when he reached the +priory of Lanercost, eight miles from Carlisle, and this +house he made his headquarters till March 26.</p> + +<p>In September, the siege of Dunaverty was proceeding +under the direction of Sir John Botetourte, the King's +ablest engineer. The local people were very slack in +aiding the English, and Edward, on September 25, +ordered Sir John de Menteith to compel them to supply +the besiegers with provisions and necessaries, 'if they +will not with a good grace.' Next month Edward empowered +Sir John of Argyll to receive to his peace, on +special conditions, Donald of Islay, Gotheri his brother, +John MacNakyld, and Sir Patrick de Graham. The conditions +suggest that they had been in a position to drive +a good bargain; and the submission of the first three at +least may, perhaps, be connected with the capitulation of +Dunaverty towards the end of October.</p> + +<p>Now, at what date did Bruce pass from Dunaverty to +Rathlin? Even were it not for Barbour's weather indications, +and for the necessity of the awkward admission +that, for some good reason—say commissariat—Bruce +fled before the English approach and left some of his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">55</a></span> +stanchest supporters in Dunaverty, it is difficult to suppose +that he could have lain undisturbed in Rathlin from mid +September to the end of January. Sir Thomas Gray records +that Prince Edward, on his return from Kildrummy (say +mid September), had an interview with Bruce, 'who had +re-entered from the Isles and had collected a force in +Athol,' at the bridge of Perth, much to the displeasure of +the King his father. Gray is manifestly wrong in some +points, and he may be wrong in all. Still, Bruce, finding +his way barred by Alexander of Argyll and not daring +to descend to the plains, may likely enough have turned +back to Athol, and, on hearing of the disaster of Kildrummy +and the capture of his Queen, his daughter, and +his sisters, may have felt driven to a desperate attempt at +accommodation. On such a supposition, it becomes easy +to accept Barbour's Perthshire and Atlantic weather, to +absolve Bruce from an apparent sacrifice of friends in +Dunaverty, and to shorten to a credible length his stay in +Rathlin. There are two difficulties to this view. One is +that the English should have gone so far out of their way +as to besiege Dunaverty so zealously, or at all. They seem, +however, to have been under the impression that Bruce +himself was there. The other difficulty is that Dunaverty had +just been taken by the English. But if the astute Angus +Oig was governor when Bruce arrived, Dunaverty was remote +enough to allow him large scope for temporising.</p> + +<p>The secret of Bruce's retreat appears to have been well +kept. In October, indeed, Edward had commissioned Sir +John of Argyll admiral on the west coast. But he did +not find Bruce. It was not till January 29, that Edward +commanded the Treasurer of Ireland to aid Sir Hugh +Bisset in fitting out 'as many well-manned vessels as he +can procure, to come to the Isles and the Scottish coast, +and join Sir John de Menteith in putting down Robert de +Bruce and his accomplices lurking there, and in cutting off +their retreat.' More precise are the terms of appointment +of Sir Simon de Montacute (January 30) as commander +of the fleet specially destined 'for service against the rebels +lurking in Scotland, and in the Isles between Scotland and +Ireland.' On February 1, Edward ordered up vessels from +Skinburness and neighbouring ports 'towards Ayr in pursuit +of Robert de Bruce and his abettors, and to cut off his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">56</a></span> +retreat.' Bruce, therefore, must have left Rathlin some +days before the end of January, and probably because of +the menace of the English fleet.</p> + +<p>Barbour keeps him in Rathlin till winter was nearly +gone—not really an inconsistency; but he seems to +attribute the exodus to Douglas's chafing at inaction. +Douglas, he says, proposed to Boyd an attempt on +Brodick Castle, which Boyd knew well. With Bruce's +leave they proceeded to Arran, and overnight set ambush +at the castle. As they lay in wait, the sub-warden arrived +with over thirty men in three boats, bringing provisions +and arms; and Douglas and Boyd set upon them. The +outcry brought men from the castle, who fled, however, +before the bold advance of the Scots, and barred the +gate. The Scots appropriated the sub-warden's provisions +and arms, and took up a position in a narrow +pass; and the garrison does not seem to have even +attempted to dislodge them.</p> + +<p>On the tenth day, it is said, Bruce arrived with the rest +of his men, in thirty-three small boats, and was conducted +by a woman to the glen where Douglas and Boyd lay, +strangely ignorant of his coming. Then Bruce determined +to dispatch the trusty Cuthbert of Carrick to sound the +people on the mainland, arranging that Cuthbert, in case +he found them favourable, should raise a fire on Turnberry +Point at a time fixed. Cuthbert found Percy in Turnberry +Castle, with some 300 men; and, as for the Scots, some +were willing, but afraid, while most were distinctly hostile. +He dared not fire the beacon.</p> + +<p>At the appointed time, Bruce looked eagerly for the +signal. He descried a fire. The party put to sea, 300 +strong, and rowed, in the dusk and the dark, right on +the fire. Cuthbert was at his wits' end; he dare not +extinguish the fire. He met Bruce at the shore, and +explained the untoward attitude of the people. 'Why, +then,' demanded Bruce angrily, with a suspicion of +treachery, 'why did you light the fire?' Cuthbert explained +it was none of his doing, and beyond his help. +What was to be done? A council of war was held. Sir +Edward Bruce is said to have decided the question by a +point-blank refusal to retire. He, for one, would strike at +once, let come what might.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">57</a></span> +Cuthbert had learned that two-thirds of the garrison +were lodged in the town. Bruce and his men entered +quietly in small parties, breaking open the doors and +slaying all they found. Percy did not venture to sally +from the castle. Bruce stayed three days, testing the +feeling of the people; but even those that secretly +favoured him were afraid to show an open preference. +It is said that a lady, a near relative of his own, Christian +of the Isles, came and encouraged him, and afterwards sent +him frequent supplies of money and victuals. While mewing +up Percy, he harried the country with increasing daring. A +strong force of Northumberland men, however, raised the +siege. Hemingburgh places Bruce's attack on Turnberry +Castle 'about Michaelmas'; but it seems very unlikely +that Bruce ventured to take the field in the south-west +before he passed to Rathlin.</p> + +<p>Apart from Barbour's details, it is plain that Bruce had +struck a heavy blow. On February 6, Edward wrote to his +Treasurer expressing surprise 'at having no news of Valence +and his forces since he went to Ayr, if they have done any +exploit or pursued the enemy.' He commands him +'quickly to order Valence, Percy, and Sir John de St +John, and others he sees, to send a trustworthy man +without delay with full particulars of their doings and the +state of affairs.' And he is 'not to forget in his letter to +them to say on the King's behalf that he hears they have +done so badly that they do not wish him to know.' To +the same effect he wrote himself to Valence on February +11, and commanded him 'to write distinctly and clearly +by the bearer the news of the parts where he is, the state +of affairs there, and the doings of himself and the others +hitherto, and how he and they have arranged further proceedings. +For he suspects from his silence that he has so +over-cautiously conducted matters that he wishes to conceal +his actions.' At the same time he addressed similar letters +to the Earls of Gloucester and Hereford, St John, and +Percy. The tone is too earnest to permit the supposition +that Edward was dissembling knowledge of the facts.</p> + +<p>Bruce had at last regained a footing—though but a precarious +footing—in his kingdom, and rendered Edward +anxious about the immediate future.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">58</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_VI" id="CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">THE TURN OF THE TIDE</span></h2> + +<p>In the midst of his new success, another severe family blow +was impending on Bruce. On February 10, 1306–7—the +first anniversary of the Dumfries tragedy—his brothers +Thomas and Alexander made a raid on Galloway, with +some 300 Scots and 700 Irish auxiliaries, landing at Loch +Ryan, in the territory of Sir Dougal MacDowall. In a +desperate fight, the force was completely crushed by +MacDowall, who captured Thomas and Alexander, and +Sir Reginald Crawford, Wallace's uncle, all 'wounded +and half-dead.' Hemingburgh says the Scots were caught +by surprise; Trevet adds 'in the night.' MacDowall +delivered his chief prisoners, together with the heads of +a baron of Cantyre and two Irish kinglets, to Prince +Edward, at Wetheral, near Carlisle. These prisoners were +all executed at Carlisle on February 17. Sir Thomas +Bruce was drawn, hanged, and beheaded; Alexander +Bruce, being a beneficed clergyman (Dean of Glasgow), +was not drawn, but he and Sir Reginald Crawford, and +apparently Sir Brice de Blair, were hanged and beheaded. +Thomas's head was placed on the castle tower, and the +heads of the others graced the three gates of the city. +MacDowall was rewarded with the lands and possessions +of Sir Robert de Boyd and Sir Brice de Blair, and on +February 19, he received fifty marks and a charger; while +on March 1, a profitable privilege was conferred, at his instance, +upon his son.</p> + +<p>According to Gray and Trevet, Bruce had sent his +brothers to Nithsdale and Annandale 'to gain over the +people.' It may be that the expedition was intended first +to operate as a diversion, and then to join Bruce himself in +Nithsdale. For Bruce, if not already in these parts, was +moving thitherwards. On February 12, Sir John Botetourte,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">59</a></span> +with a considerable force, including over a score of knights, +started to make a raid on Bruce in Nithsdale; and on +March 8, he was reinforced by 180 archers from Carlisle. +The details, however, are not recorded.</p> + +<p>It was probably in February, upon the landing of Bruce +in Carrick, that Edward issued from Lanercost an ordinance +intended to conciliate the Scots, while it graded carefully +the degrees of punishment for the worst classes of delinquents. +Contrary to the King's intention, the ordinance +had been interpreted as too harsh and rigorous. On +March 13, therefore, he materially modified it. A few +days later, he directed steps to be taken for the repair +and fortification of several castles on the east side beyond +Forth, and ordered fresh levies from the northern counties +of England to muster, 2300 strong, at Carlisle by a fortnight +after Easter.</p> + +<p>In a lull of the Nithsdale operations, Bruce is said to +have reluctantly granted Douglas leave to proceed to +Douglasdale, accompanied only by two yeomen. On +arrival, Douglas disclosed himself to Tom Dickson of +Hazelside, a stanch old warrior-tenant of his father's, who +was overjoyed to see the youth, and introduced him to +the other leal men of the land, one by one, at private +conferences. It was quickly decided to fall upon the +unsuspecting garrison of Douglas Castle in St Bride's +Church on Palm Sunday (March 19). The countrymen +would bring concealed weapons, and Douglas would +appear, with his two men, in the guise of a corn-thresher, +a threadbare mantle on his back and a flail on his +shoulder. The moment he raised his war-cry, they would +overpower the soldiers, and then the castle would offer no +resistance. Everything fell out as planned, except that +an over-eager friend prematurely raised the Douglas war-cry. +Dickson instantly fell upon the English in the +chancel, and a neighbour followed his example; but both +were slain. At this moment Douglas came on the scene, +raised his war-cry, and pressed hard on the English, who +manfully defended themselves. About twenty were killed; +the remaining ten were taken prisoners. At the castle, +Douglas found only the porter and the cook; and so he +barred the gates, and dined at leisure. After dinner, he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">60</a></span> +packed up valuables, arms, and other portable things, and +proceeded to destroy what he could not take away. He +piled the wheat, flour, meal, and malt on the floor of the +wine cellar, beheaded the prisoners on the pile, and +broached the wine casks. This ghastly mess was locally +designated 'the Douglas Larder.' He then spoilt the +well by throwing in salt and dead horses. Finally, he set +fire to the castle, and left nothing but stones. The party +dispersed, and hid away their wounded. But Clifford, for +whom the castle had been held, soon had it rebuilt and +regarrisoned.</p> + +<p>A later petition, by Lucas de Barry, represents that +Lucas had been 'under Sir Robert de Clifford in Douglas +Castle when Sir Robert de Brus and Sir James Douglas +attacked it, the year when the late King died.' But this +does not necessarily mean that either Clifford or Bruce +was there in person.</p> + +<p>On the same Sunday morning, Edward entered Carlisle +with Peter, Cardinal Bishop of St Sabine, a papal legate, +who had just arrived to arrange terms of peace between +the English and French kings on the basis of a marriage +between Prince Edward and Isabella, daughter of the +King of France. On the Wednesday following, in the +Cathedral, the legate explained the objects of his mission, +and, with bell, book and candle, excommunicated the +murderers of Comyn, with all their aiders and abettors. +The like denunciation was busily repeated through the +churches, especially of the north of England. On Friday, +the peace was proclaimed.</p> + +<p>Towards the end of March, Sir John Wallace is said +to have been captured 'in the plain, pursued by the northeners,' +and was taken to Carlisle. Edward sent him to +London, 'fettered on a hackney,' to undergo the same +barbarous death as his heroic brother. His head was +fixed on London Bridge, 'raised with shouts,' says Langtoft, +'near the head of his brother, William the Wicked.' +It could not have been more nobly honoured.</p> + +<p>By the middle of April, Bruce had moved to Glen +Trool, where he was hard beset for some three weeks by +superior forces under a number of able knights, young +Sir John Comyn among them. The incidents of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">61</a></span> +period have not been preserved. Barbour, indeed, tells +how Valence and Clifford advanced stealthily on Bruce, +with over 1500 against less than 300 men, and found +him in a narrow pass, where horse could not reach him. +Valence sent a woman, disguised as a beggar, to spy +out the position; but Bruce saw through the dodge, and +the spy confessed. The English had to advance on foot. +Bruce dashed upon them with fury, seizing with his own +hand their foremost banner. Some of his men, Barbour +admits, had gone off, but came back on seeing how the +fight went. The foremost English company being overpowered, +the main body retreated; and a quarrel between +Clifford and Vaux seems to point to a fruitless attempt +of Clifford's to rally the fugitives. One can only say +that some such incidents are probable enough. Anyhow, +Bruce appears to have baffled all the attempts of the +English in Glen Trool, and to have got away towards +Lothian.</p> + +<p>In Lothian, Bruce found friends. The people, Hemingburgh +explains, had been exasperated during the preceding +year by the justice of the English justiciars; and, therefore, +'as if unanimously, they rose and went with Bruce, willing +rather to die than to be judged by the English laws.' +Thus reinforced, Bruce turned back to meet Valence. +Perhaps it was now that he over-ran Kyle and Cunningham. +Valence, says Barbour, despatched from Bothwell 1000 +men under Sir Philip de Mowbray, whom Douglas with +60 men met at Ederford, a narrow pass between two +marshes, and, by skilful strategy, totally defeated. Stung +by this ignominious reverse, Valence challenged Bruce, +who lay at Galston, to meet him on May 10, at Loudon +Hill—the scene of Wallace's father's death and of Wallace's +first victory. Bruce accepted the challenge. Choosing +his ground between two stretches of moss, he cut three +deep trenches (with adequate gaps for the passage of his +men) across the hard moor between, and marshalled his +600 followers, so that Valence's 3000 men could come +into action only in detail. He ordered a fierce onset +on the foremost, with the view of discouraging the rest—the +successful tactic in Glen Trool; and Sir Edward +and Douglas, as well as himself, are said to have performed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">62</a></span> +prodigies of valour. The English gave way, and, +despite his utmost efforts, Valence was driven from the +field. Barbour says he retreated to Bothwell; Gray states +that Bruce pursued him to Ayr. Three days later, Bruce +also defeated the Earl of Gloucester with even greater +slaughter (says Hemingburgh) than had reddened Loudon +Hill, and besieged him in Ayr Castle.</p> + +<p>From a letter, anonymous, dated May 15, we learn without +surprise that Edward 'was much enraged that the +Warden and his force had retreated before King Hobbe'—his +familiar designation of Bruce. What does surprise +one is to learn, on the same authority, that 'James of +Douglas sent and begged to be received, but, when he saw +the King's forces retreat, he drew back.' It would be quite +intelligible that the hardships of his first terrible year of +service had shaken the nerve of the youthful warrior. But +there were now 'rumours of treasonable dealings between +some of the English and the enemy,' and it seems far more +probable that Douglas was engineering one of his ruses. +It needs better evidence to stamp this solitary suggestion +of a blot on the clear scutcheon of Douglas.</p> + +<p>The news of Bruce's success, no doubt exaggerated and +distorted, produced a great sensation in the northern parts +of Scotland. A calendared letter, anonymous, written +from Forfar to some high official under date May 15, +graphically pictures the local feeling.</p> + +<blockquote> + +<p>The writer hears that Sir Robert de Brus never had the goodwill of +his own followers or the people at large, or even half of them, so +much with him as now; and it now first appears that he was right, +and God is openly with him, as he has destroyed all the King's power +both among the English and the Scots, and the English force is in +retreat to its own country not to return. And they firmly believe, by +the encouragement of the false preachers who come from the host, +that Sir Robert de Brus will now have his will. And these preachers +are such as have been attached before the Warden and the justices as +abettors of war, and are at present freed on guarantees and deceiving +the people thus by their false preachment. For he (the writer) believes +assuredly, as he hears from Sir Reginald de Cheyne, Sir Duncan de +Frendraught, and Sir Gilbert de Glencairney, and others who watch +the peace both beyond and on this side of the mountains (Mounth), +that, if Sir Robert de Brus can escape any way 'saun dreytes' or +towards the parts of Ross, he will find them all ready at his will more +entirely than ever, unless the King will be pleased to send more men-<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">63</a></span>at-arms +to these parts; for there are many people living well and +loyally at his faith provided the English are in power, otherwise they +see that they must be at the enemies' will through default of the King +and his Council, as they say. And it would be a deadly sin to leave +them so without protection among enemies. And may it please God +to keep the King's life, for when we lose him, which God forbid, say +they openly, all must be on one side, or they must die or leave the +country with all those who love the King, if other counsel or aid be +not sent them. For these preachers have told them that they have +found a prophecy of Merlin, how, after the death of the grasping King +(<i xml:lang="fr" lang="fr">le Roi Coueytous</i>), the Scottish people and the Bretons shall league +together, and have the sovereign hand and their will, and live together +in accord till the end of the world.</p></blockquote> + +<p>It was probably reports of this tenor that drew Valence +and Bevercotes on a hasty visit to the north immediately +after Loudon Hill. They were both in Inverness on +May 20.</p> + +<p>The reverses sustained by Valence and Gloucester led to +increased activity on the English side. The Bishop of +Chester, with his successor as treasurer (the Bishop of +Lichfield and Coventry), was at Lanark on May 15, at +Dumfries next day, and on May 18 he was back at Carlisle, +having seen to the provisioning of the fortresses. Edward +was 'so greatly pleased with his account that he kissed +him—especially for his borrowing the castle of Cumnock +from its owner, Earl Patrick, for a term, and garrisoning it +with 30 men-at-arms under Sir Ingram de Umfraville and +Sir William de Felton, besides 100 foot.' The Bishop +went south next day to represent Edward at the funeral of +the Countess of Gloucester, the King's daughter Joan.</p> + +<p>Edward himself was too ill to travel. Besides, he was +immersed in military preparations, summoning reinforcements +and hurrying up supplies. Bruce, though unable to +maintain the siege of Ayr, did considerable damage; for +on June 1, Valence requisitioned masons and carpenters +from Carlisle 'to repair the castle and houses.' At the +same time, Valence added some 300 men to the garrison, +'to strengthen the castle and secure the country round, +while he is on his foray towards Carrick and Glen Trool.' +He was following up Bruce. Probably, too, he avenged +Loudon Hill before the arrival of Edward's fresh levies, +which had been summoned to be at Carlisle by the middle +of July. Hemingburgh says the English 'defeated Bruce<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">64</a></span> +with great slaughter, so that he lurked thereafter in moors +and marshes' with the ridiculous force of 'some 10,000 +foot, and the English could not get at him, as he always +slipped out of their hands.' Gray says that Bruce was so +badly beaten 'that he retired on foot through the mountains, +and from isle to isle, and sometimes he had not so +much as a single companion with him.' One is inclined to +give the credit of this defeat to Valence—if defeat there +was. Bruce may have taken refuge again in Glen Trool; +Gray's mention of the isles may result from a confusion +with earlier events. This record of fresh disaster finds no +mention in Barbour or in Fordun.</p> + +<p>Sir Thomas Gray, professing to quote from 'the chronicles +of his deeds,' relates how at this time Bruce came, all alone, +to a passage between two islands, over which he was ferried +by two boatmen. Had he heard any news of what had +become of Bruce? they asked. 'None,' he replied. +'Certes,' said they, 'we would we had grip of him at this +moment; he should die by our hands.' 'And why?' +queried Bruce. 'Because he murdered John Comyn, our +lord,' was the answer. They landed him. 'My good +fellows,' said Bruce, 'you wanted to get hold of Robert de +Bruce. Look at me!—that will give you satisfaction. And +were it not that you have done me the courtesy of ferrying +me over this narrow passage, you should rue your wish.' +So he went on his way.</p> + +<div class="tb">*<span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span></div> + +<p>Barbour recounts various exploits of Bruce and Douglas +between the landing in Carrick and the first retreat to Glen +Trool; but, if they represent facts, they must clearly be +spread over a longer period.</p> + +<p>For example. Sir Ingram Bell, the governor of Ayr—Barbour +writes Sir Ingram de Umfraville, who was probably +in Cumnock Castle—intrigued with a personal attendant of +Bruce's, a man of local importance, a one-eyed, sturdy +rascal, nearly related to Bruce. The villain was promised +a reward of £40 in land to compass the King's death. +With his two sons, who were also trusted by Bruce, he lay +in wait one morning for his master, when he had gone out +with only a page in attendance. Bruce, suspecting the +men, ordered them to stand. As they still came on, he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">65</a></span> +drew his page's bow, and shot the father in the eye; and +with his sword he cleft the skull of one son after the other. +This may be one of half a dozen possible variants of the +story of the Brooch of Lorn.</p> + +<p>Not long afterwards, in the dusk of evening, Bruce with +60 men was attacked by over 200 Galwegians, who had +brought a sleuth-hound to track him. Warned by his +sentinels, he drew his men into a narrow pass in a bog, +and, leaving Sir Gilbert de la Haye in charge, went out +with two men to reconnoitre the position. Passing some +way along the water side, he found the banks high and the +water deep, and no ford but the one he had crossed. Here +he sent his men back to camp, and watched alone. Presently +he heard the deep baying of the hound, and soon +the enemy appeared, under a bright moon. He determined +to stand; they must come on singly in the strait passage. +They plunged confidently into the water, but Bruce bore +down the foremost with his spear, and stabbed the horse, +which fell in the ascent from the water and impeded the +others. He kept the ford; and, when his men came up, +they found fourteen slain, and the rest in retreat. The +rumour of this exploit drew many to his side.</p> + +<p>Again Douglas repaired to Douglasdale and set an +ambush near Sandilands. With a small party he then +took some cattle near the castle of Douglas and drove +them off. Thirlwall, the constable, sallied out and pursued +the party past the ambush. Attacked suddenly, +he was slain in attempted defence, together with most of +his men. The survivors fled to the castle, barred the gate, +and manned the walls. Douglas had to content himself +with what booty he could find about the castle.</p> + +<p>Presently Douglas, hearing of the approach of Valence +with a strong force, joined the King in a narrow pass near +Cumnock. Bruce had but 300 men. Valence was +accompanied by John of Lorn, who headed over 800 +and had a sleuth-hound, said to have been once a +favourite of Bruce's. On finding himself caught between +the two bodies, Bruce divided his men into three companies, +anticipating that the enemy would follow his own track, +and that so his other two companies would escape. The +hound followed Bruce, who gradually dispersed his company,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">66</a></span> +at last keeping only his foster-brother with him. +Still the hound persisted. John of Lorn then sent forward +five of his stoutest men to take Bruce. Three attacked +Bruce; two assailed his foster-brother. Bruce killed one +of his opponents, and, marking the dismay of the others, +jumped aside to help his foster-brother, and smote off the +head of one of his assailants. He then killed his own two +pursuers, while his foster-brother despatched the only one +remaining. Meantime Lorn closed up with the hound. +Bruce, with his companion, made for a wood, and threw +himself down by a stream, declaring he could go no farther; +but, yielding to his friend's remonstrances, he got up, and +they waded together some way down the stream, thus +baffling the hound and escaping further pursuit. Another +account, according to Barbour, was that the King's companion +lurked in a thicket and shot the hound with an +arrow. Anyhow, Bruce escaped. It is said that Randolph +captured Bruce's banner in the pursuit, much to the satisfaction +of the English King.</p> + +<p>Having cleared the forest, Bruce and his companion +were crossing a moor, when they came on three men, +armed with swords and axes, one of them carrying a +sheep on his shoulder. The men said they wished to +join Bruce, and Bruce said he would take them to him. +They perceived that he was Bruce, and he perceived that +they were foes. Bruce insisted that, till better acquaintance, +they should go separate and in front of him. Coming +to an empty house at night, they killed the sheep, roasted +it, divided it, and dined at opposite ends of the room. +Bruce, tired and hungry as he had been, must sleep, his +man promising to keep watch. His man, however, fell +asleep too; he 'might not hold up an e'e.' The men then +attacked Bruce, who instantly awoke, grasped his sword, +and trod heavily on his man. Bruce slew the three, but +lost his companion, who was killed in his sleep.</p> + +<p>Bruce now made for the rallying-point of his dispersed +companies. Here he found the goodwife of the house +'sitting on a bink.' In answer to her exhaustive inquiries, +he said he was a wayfarer. 'All wayfarers,' said she, 'are +welcome for the sake of one—King Robert the Bruce.' +Then the King revealed himself. Where were his men?<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">67</a></span> +He had none. Thereupon the gallant woman declared her +two big sons should become his men. As he sat at meat, +he heard the tread of soldiers, and started up to offer +defence. It was Douglas and Sir Edward Bruce with +150 men.</p> + +<p>Bruce now suggested that the enemy, confident that his +force was dissipated, would lie open to surprise. He made +a forced march overnight, and at daylight caught a large +detachment—certainly nothing like 2000 (Barbour's figures)—in +some town, and slew two-thirds of them. He retreated +before the main body began to stir, and Valence did not +pursue.</p> + +<p>On another occasion Bruce went a-hunting alone, with +two hounds. He had his sword, but had laid aside his +armour. Presently he saw three men with bows approaching—men +that had in fact been watching for such an +opportunity to take vengeance for Comyn. Bruce taunted +them for attacking with arrows, three to one, and they +chivalrously threw down their bows and drew their swords. +Bruce struck down one; a hound fixed in another's throat +and brought him to the ground, when Bruce cut his back +in two; and the third, fleeing to the wood, was seized and +pulled down by a hound and despatched by Bruce.</p> + +<p>These stories represent early traditions and may easily +be true, though they may be merely imaginary. The three-men +stories may be variants of a single original, but by no +means necessarily.</p> + +<div class="tb">*<span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span></div> + +<p>On July 7, 1307, Edward I. died at Burgh-on-Sands, +some three miles from Carlisle. Owing to the poor success +of his lieutenants, the gallant King had determined to +move forward in person. On Monday, July 3, he is said +to have advanced from Carlisle; but it was Thursday +before he reached Burgh-on-Sands. On Friday, as his +attendants raised him up in bed to eat, he died in their +hands. On his sick-bed—or, as Walsingham says, on his +death-bed—Edward had again charged the Prince to persist +steadily in the war against Bruce, taking his bones with +him in a casket. 'For,' said the dying King, with heroic +confidence, 'no one will be able to overcome you while +you have my bones borne with you.' But all his dying<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">68</a></span> +advice and solemn charges the Prince eventually disregarded.</p> + +<p>The body of the late King was conveyed south in great +state, to lie in the church at Waltham till a definite settlement +was attained in Scotland. The Prince attended +the cortège several stages, and then returned to Carlisle. +Edward was buried at Westminster on October 28.</p> + +<p>Edward I. was not only the greatest of English Kings, +but one of the greatest of Englishmen. His treatment of +Scotland, however he may have reasoned out the justice of +it, must always remain a very dark blot on his memory. +Never was his military ardour or his personal resolution +more signally manifested than in the last months and days +of his latest expedition. He died in harness, his valiant +spirit shining undimmed till the moment it was quenched +by death itself. The virile judgment and stern purpose of +Edward I. was succeeded by the childish incompetence +and obstinacy of Edward II. The death of the great King +assured the eventual triumph of Bruce. The moment anticipated +by nationalists with hope and by anti-nationalists +with dread was come. It was the turn of the tide.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">69</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_VII" id="CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">RECONQUEST OF TERRITORY</span></h2> + +<p>While the great Edward was passing south on his last +march, Valence was actively engaged in strengthening the +English positions in Kyle and Carrick. Percy held Ayr +Castle, and John of Argyll guarded Ayr town and neighbourhood +with a large force, which was presently joined +by half a score of redoubtable Scots knights with their +followings.</p> + +<p>The young King started from Carlisle on July 31, 1307, +for Dumfries, where many Scots nobles obeyed his +summons to do homage and fealty. Advancing up the +valley of the Nith, he was at Cumnock on August 21, and +stayed there fully a week. At Tinwald, on August 30, he +confirmed Valence in the office of Warden of Scotland. +He offered to receive to his peace all Scotsmen not +implicated in the murder of Comyn. The Lanercost +chronicler says he divided his army into three bodies to +pursue Bruce, but the pursuit was unsuccessful, and on +September 4 he returned to Carlisle with empty hands.</p> + +<p>The effects of the accession of Edward II. were quickly +apparent. No sooner had he retired than the whole +Border was ablaze. Even the faithful men of Selkirk and +Tweeddale and of the Forest, tenants of the Warden himself, +rose in force, and on September 12 the Sheriff of +Roxburgh reported that 'the poor tenants' of his district +had fled into England with their goods for fear of the +enemy. The weight of the Scots attack, however, was +thrown upon Galloway and the MacDowalls. The English +settlers fled in numbers; for, on September 25, Edward +ordered Clifford, the justiciar of the forest beyond Trent, +'to allow the men of Galloway to feed their flocks and +herds in Englewood Forest, whither they have come to +take refuge for fear of Robert de Brus and his accomplices.'<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">70</a></span> +On the same day he directed Sir Thomas de +Multon of Egremont and four other northern barons to +hasten to Lancashire, Cumberland, and Westmorland, to +assist John, baron of Wigton, and Richard le Brun, his +justices there, 'for the salvation and quiet of the men of +those parts,' and to redress the wrongs and losses they +sustained, and to repel the incursions of the Scots. It looks +as if a swift foray had been executed by the men of Selkirk +and Tweeddale. On September 30, Edward, who had +now learned further from St John, MacDowall, and other +officers in Galloway, that Bruce was 'burning and plundering, +and inciting and compelling the inhabitants to rebel,' +commanded Sir John de Bretagne, who had just succeeded +Valence, to march against the enemy. At the same time +he summoned to the Warden's assistance Earl Patrick and +half a dozen other powerful Scots, as well as the baron of +Wigton and Richard le Brun, apparently already relieved +of their Selkirk visitors, and the keepers of the peace of +Northumberland and Tyndale. The Lanercost chronicler +admits that the Galwegians purchased peace, being unable +to resist the forces of Bruce.</p> + +<p>Sir Thomas Gray also bears testimony to Bruce's +activity, and explains the favour he steadily gained, in +part at least, by the harsh conduct of English officials +'for purposes of individual advantage.' We have already +seen that as early as May Scotland beyond the Forth was +ready for the advent of Bruce, and the English officers +were looking forward with dread to the death of Edward I. +And now Bruce turned from Galloway to the north.</p> + +<p>According to Fordun, Bruce advanced as far as Inverness, +where he took the castle and levelled it with the +ground, slaying the garrison; and the other fortresses of +the north he dealt with in like drastic fashion. In this expedition, +no doubt, it was—in late October and November +1307—that Bruce overran Ross, Sutherland, and Caithness, +and compelled the Earl of Ross to take truce. The Earl's +apologetic petition to Edward explains how Bruce came +against him with 3000 men and subjugated these counties, +'and would have destroyed them utterly if we had not +taken truce with him at the entreaty of the good people, +both religious and other, till Whitsunday next.' Ross<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">71</a></span> +declares that he could get no help from the Warden of +Moray. The Bishop of Moray, who had taken refuge in +Orkney for about a year and whose lands had been +loyally raided by Ross, had by this time returned to +Edward's peace, and was demanding damages for the +wasting of his lands. He, at any rate, was not likely to +have moved a finger against Bruce; on the contrary, he +no doubt privately aided him. Ross's apologies were +accepted; for in May 1308 he appears as Lieutenant of +the Warden of Scotland, and is requested to remain in +office till midsummer. But on October 31, he submitted +to Bruce, who reinstated him in his lands (with fresh +additions), and his name heads the roll of Bruce's Parliament +at St Andrews on March 16, 1308–9.</p> + +<p>Barbour, making no mention of these exploits, brings +Bruce north of the Mounth and on to Inverurie in +Aberdeenshire. Bruce is joined by Sir Alexander Fraser +and Simon Fraser—the famous Sir Simon's brother and +son—who had apparently been acting in his interests in +the north, opposed mainly by Comyn (Earl of Buchan), +Sir John de Mowbray, and Sir David de Brechin. At +Inverurie Bruce fell very sick. He could neither eat nor +drink; no medicine did him any good; he became too +weak to ride or to walk. Sir Edward Bruce, says Barbour, +tried to comfort the men, but it seems much more likely +that Sir Edward remained in command in Galloway, while +Douglas made excursions towards the eastern border. +At any rate, Bruce's men would not fight while their chief +was ill, or Bruce had too much prudence to allow them; +so they placed him on a litter and carried him into the +Slevach (mountain fastnesses). Comyn, hearing of Bruce's +serious illness, advanced against him with Mowbray and +Brechin, and with a largely superior force. The time, says +Barbour, was 'after Martinmas, when snow covered all the +land.' Bruce quietly awaited attack. On three successive +days there occurred skirmishes between bodies of archers, +Buchan's men getting the worst of the encounter day after +day. Buchan's force, however, was continuously obtaining +additions, while Bruce was getting pinched with hunger. +Placing the King in his litter again, Bruce's men changed +quarters, marching slowly in fighting order, with their sick<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">72</a></span> +chief in the centre, and restricting themselves rigidly to +defence. They took up a position in Strathbogie, a little +further north, and Buchan's force abandoned the pursuit +and dispersed.</p> + +<p>The King gradually regained strength and returned to +Inverurie, 'to be in the plains for the winter,' for the better +chances of food. Again Buchan proceeded to attack him, +reaching Oldmeldrum 'on the evening before Yule even' +(January 4) 1307–8, with about 1000 men. Next day +Brechin made a dash at Inverurie; whereupon Bruce, in +spite of remonstrances, determined to mount and fight, +though, says Fordun, 'he could not go upright, but with +the help of two men to prop him up.' He is said to have +had 'near 700 men.' He advanced towards Oldmeldrum, +and as the enemy retreated, pressed steadily upon them, +pushing their retreat into flight, and pursuing them, Fordun +says, as far as Fyvie. Buchan and Mowbray fled to England, +while Brechin stood a siege in his own castle of +Brechin. Bruce's 'herschip' (harrying) of the district of +Buchan is said to have been so exemplary that men +lamented it for half a century afterwards.</p> + +<p>There are discrepancies between Barbour's account and +Fordun's. Fordun dates Buchan's retirement from the +Slevach on Christmas day (on which Barbour fights at +Inverurie and Oldmeldrum), and he arranges a truce on +the occasion. It is in the Slevach that he makes Bruce's +illness commence. He dates the battle of Inverurie, without +mention of Oldmeldrum, vaguely in 1308. He also +calls Mowbray Philip, not John, and he says nothing of +Brechin. Buchan and Mowbray, if they did not then flee +to England, at any rate went south not very long after this +time; and if Brechin surrendered his castle, it was certainly +not, as Barbour says it was, to David, Earl of Athol, who +was on the English side. On May 20, 1308, Edward +writes to thank a great number of his officers in Scotland, +including Athol, Buchan, Brechin, John de Mowbray, and +others, for their faithful service, and he requests Buchan +to remain 'in the district committed to him' till August 1. +This may mean that up to May he had remained in +command in the north, though keeping clear of Bruce's +devastating track.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">73</a></span> +Having reduced the country beyond the Grampians +('benorth the Mounth'), Bruce descended upon Angus. +Barbour says nothing of an attack on Brechin Castle, +having already recorded its capture and the submission +of Sir David to Bruce; but, as we have seen, Sir David +was still—and, indeed, for several years to come—on the +English side; and Barbour was evidently misinformed. +Forfar Castle was taken by Philip the Forester, of Platter; +the watch had not been vigilant, and Philip scaled the +walls. Bruce demolished the castle; whether because it +was of the old ineffective type, or because he had no means +of holding it. He then, according to Barbour, invested +Perth, which was strongly fortified, and was held by Moffat +and Oliphant—Sir William Oliphant, the gallant defender +of Stirling, who had been released from the Tower on +May 24, 1308, having lain rusting there for nearly four +years. The Earl of Strathearn, says Barbour, was also in +the garrison, while his son and his men were in Bruce's +camp; but Barbour is mistaken, for though Strathearn had +been transferred from Rochester Castle to York Castle in +the preceding November, he does not appear to have +been released till November 18 of this year. Frequent +skirmishes took place during a six weeks' siege, when +Bruce suddenly decamped, amid the premature jeers of +the garrison. After eight days he returned suddenly in +the night, and, finding the English lulled in security, +plunged into the moat up to his neck, mounted the walls +by ladder, and surprised the sentinels. His men, dispersed +in groups, gave the garrison no chance to marshal for +effective defence. The English leaders were taken; but +few men were slain, in consideration of their decent treatment +of Scots. There was much booty for the victors. +Bruce demolished the walls and the towers. 'Was none +that durst him then withstand.' Whether this capture of +Perth be fact or not—and probably it should be placed at +a later date—Bruce now had the upper hand north of +Forth.</p> + +<p>While Bruce was re-conquering his kingdom in the +north, Edward II. had married Isabella of France at +Boulogne on January 28, 1307–8, and had been crowned +at Westminster on February 25. He had at once plunged<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">74</a></span> +himself in difficulties with his barons by his infatuation for +Piers de Gaveston. In June some purpose of accommodation +with Bruce appears to have been pressed upon the +English king. There exists a memorandum dated June, +without the year, which Mr Bain rightly, it seems, assigns to +1308. It sets out that the levies summoned to meet the +King at Carlisle on August 23 shall be countermanded; +and that the King shall take no truce or sufferance from +Bruce, but the Wardens of Scotland—Sir Robert de +Umfraville, Earl of Angus, and Sir William de Ros of +Hamelake (appointed on June 21)—'may take such, for +as long time as possible, as they have done hitherto of +their own power or by commission, so that the King, +however, may furnish his castles with men and victuals, +and that no one be taken or other "mesprision" made +during such truce.' Then the wardens of districts are +arranged. The Earl of Buchan, Sir John de Mowbray, +and Sir Ingram de Umfraville are to be wardens of Galloway, +Annandale, and Carrick respectively; Sir Alexander +de Abernethy, Sir Edmund de Hastings, and Sir John +Fitz Marmaduke, are to be wardens beyond the Forth. +The endorsement bears that the Wardens of Scotland shall +'take truce from Robert de Brus as from themselves, as +long as they can, but not beyond the month of Pasques' +(April), and—curiously enough—that 'the King may break +the truce at pleasure if the others will yield this point, but, +if they will not, the truce may be made without it.' The +memorandum testifies to the strength of Bruce's hold on +the country, and to the recalcitrance of Edward's barons. +Still Edward struggled on. On June 21, he requested a +large number of officers to retain their posts till specified +dates, and to join the Scottish expedition at Carlisle on +August 23. On July 10, he requisitioned ships and men +from Shoreham all round to Bristol, for the King 'needs a +great fleet.' But on August 11, he countermanded the order +for these ships and men, 'the King having deferred his +expedition for the present.' The English barons were too +strong for the young King.</p> + +<p>It is not clear at what date Bruce proceeded to reduce +Argyll. Probably, however, he undertook the expedition +immediately after the reduction of the north. If he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">75</a></span> +conducted a six weeks' siege of Perth, and Sir William +Oliphant was one of the defenders, he could not have +been free to go west till the very end of July 1308. +Fordun states that, within a week after August 15, Bruce +defeated the men of Argyll and subdued the whole land; +that he then besieged Alexander of Argyll 'for some time' +in Dunstaffnage Castle (some three miles from Oban); and +that Alexander, on surrendering, refused to do homage, but +was allowed a safe-conduct for himself and his followers to +England. Barbour tells how Lorn—John, the son of Alexander—gathered +some 2000 men and opposed Bruce in a +narrow pass between a steep mountain and the sheer bank +of a loch—perhaps between Ben Cruachan and Loch Awe. +Lorn held the loch in his boats, and ambushed a party on +the ridge commanding the pass. Bruce, having despatched +Douglas, Sir Alexander Fraser, Sir William Wiseman, and +Sir Andrew Gray, with a body of archers, to fetch a circuit +above Lorn's ambush, boldly advanced up the pass. Lorn's +men attacked, tumbling stones down the slope; but, finding +themselves caught in the rear, they fled down hill to a +bridge crossing the river at one end of the loch, and, having +crossed, attempted to break down the bridge. Bruce was +upon them before they could effect their purpose, and +completely defeated them. Having rapidly overrun Lorn's +country, he took Dunstaffnage, and received to his peace +Alexander of Argyll, while John of Lorn, 'rebel as he was +wont to be,' escaped by water. Bruce then received the +homage of all the men of Argyll, and returned to Perth.</p> + +<p>But these events must have been spread over a considerable +time, and they may not have been continuous. The +record of Bruce's Parliament at St Andrews on March 16, +1308–9, places it beyond doubt that Alexander of Argyll +came to Bruce's peace; it states that Alexander himself +and 'the barons of the whole of Argyll and Inchegall' +were present as liegemen of Bruce. Again, on June 16, +1309, both Alexander and John of Lorn were present at +Edward's council at Westminster as liegemen of the English +king. Further, we have a letter of Lorn's, undated, but +replying to a letter of Edward's dated March 11, in which +he says that he had been on sick-bed for half a year; that +Bruce 'had approached his territories with 10,000 or 15,000<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">76</a></span> +men, it was said, both by land and sea,' while he 'had no +more than 800 to oppose him,' and 'the barons of Argyll +gave him no aid'; that a truce had been made, at the +instance of Bruce; that 'he hears that Bruce, when he +came, was boasting that he (Lorn) had come to his peace,' +'which God and he (Lorn) knows is not true'; that, on +the contrary, 'he is, and will ever be, ready to serve him +(Edward) to the utmost of his power'; that 'he has three +castles to guard, and a loch twenty-four leagues long, on +which he has vessels properly manned, but is not sure of his +neighbours'; and that 'so soon as the King or his power +arrives, he will be ready with lands, ships, and others to +aid him,' either in person (if he be not sick), or by his son. +Neglecting minor discrepancies, one may safely accept Mr +Bain's reconciliation of the various accounts. Alexander +came to Bruce's peace after the affair of Loch Awe; John +was still holding out in March, but was driven from Dunstaffnage +within the next two months; and Alexander +thereupon retired, with John, to England. Alexander +died in Ireland in the end of 1310. John lived to fight +for Edward some seven or eight years more; but, as Mr +Bain gently remarks, 'Barbour has strangely misrepresented +his later career.'</p> + +<p>Bruce was now master in the west as well as in the north. +Beyond Forth, however, Perth, if ever captured, must soon +have been recovered; and Dundee—and even Banff—remained +in English hands, as well as the key-fortress of +Stirling on the south bank of the dividing river. Still +Bruce was master of the country, and he was free to turn +his attention to the south.</p> + +<p>Sir Edward Bruce, after an arduous struggle, had taken +a firm grip of Galloway by the end of 1308. With Lindsay, +Boyd, and Douglas he had attacked the Galwegians—'notwithstanding +the tribute they received from them,' says the +Lanercost chronicler, who also admits that they 'subdued +almost all that land.' According to Barbour, Sir Edward +met the English near Cree, routed them, slew some 1200, +and pursued Umfraville and St John to Buittle Castle. St +John then rode to England and brought up over 1500 +men; on hearing which, Sir Edward instantly mounted, +with 50 men, followed up the trail of the enemy in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">77</a></span> +morning mist, and, when the day cleared and he found +himself within bowshot, charged with his usual reckless +audacity. The English believed there must be more men +with Sir Edward than they saw. At the third charge he +routed them, slaying or taking many; St John, however, +escaping. Sir Allan de Cathcart, Barbour affirms, 'told +me this tale.' Sir Edward had all Galloway at the King's +peace.</p> + +<p>Fordun, again, relates that Sir Edward, on November 18, +inflicted a crushing defeat on Donald of the Isles and the +Galwegians on the river Dee (not Cree), taking Donald +prisoner in his flight, and slaying 'a knight named Roland, +with many of the nobles of Galloway.' Whatever the dates +and the details, Sir Edward must have done some stern +fighting. The Lanercost chronicler even records that it +was said that the English king would have liked, if he +could, to give Bruce peace on terms of aiding him against +his earls and barons.</p> + +<p>No doubt the MacDowalls were uprooted. But Mr Bain +seems somewhat lax in stating that 'before April 1, 1309, +Sir Dougal, their head, had been driven into England, +where for thirty years he and his family were obliged to +remain to escape the vengeance of the Bruces.' On April +1, 1309, it is true, Sir Dougal received as a reward for his +services, 'whereby he has become hated by the enemy,' +the manor of Temple Couton, in Yorkshire, 'for the +residence and support of his wife and children.' But he +himself was constable of Dumfries Castle in 1311, sheriff +also in 1312, and he had the mortification of surrendering +the castle to Bruce on February 7, 1312–13. Edward made +provision for him from time to time till his death (before +January 27, 1327–28). A petition by his son and heir +Duncan, dated 1347, represents that Sir Dougal lost £100 +in land for his allegiance to Edward I. and Edward II.; +that Sir Dougal's brother was slain (in revenge for Bruce's +two brothers); that the petitioner's eldest brother had been +slain at Bannockburn; and that he and his six brothers were +destitute. It shows a dark glimpse of the losing side.</p> + +<p>In the meantime, according to Barbour, Douglas had +done some useful work on his account. Some time after +Bruce went north, he proceeded to Douglasdale again<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">78</a></span> +and placed an ambush near his ancestral castle. He sent +fourteen men with sackfuls of grass on horses' backs to +pass along as if bound for Lanark fair. Sir John Webton, +the constable, sallied upon them; whereupon they cast +down the sacks, threw off their frocks, and, mounting their +horses, showed fight. Douglas now broke ambush and cut +off Webton from the castle, eventually slaying him and all +his men. Barbour relates that there was found in Webton's +pouch a letter from a lady engaging to marry him if he kept +'the auenturous castell of Douglas' for a year—a story +worked up by Sir Walter Scott in his boldly unhistorical +'Castle Dangerous.' Douglas took the castle and demolished +it.</p> + +<p>Douglas also, Barbour says, did a great deal of hard +fighting in Selkirk Forest. On one occasion, in a house +on the Water of Lyne (which joins the Tweed a few miles +above Peebles), he lighted upon Sir Alexander Stewart of +Bonkill, whose father, Sir John, distinguished himself so +brilliantly at Falkirk, Randolph, Bruce's nephew, Sir Adam +de Gordon, and others, who were really in search of himself. +He surrounded the house, and a fierce fight resulted. +Gordon got away safe, but Douglas captured Stewart, who +was wounded, and Randolph, and took them next morning +to the King—who, in that case, must already have returned +south. Barbour tells of the proud bearing of Randolph, +and how Bruce put him 'in firm keeping' till he acknowledged +his authority. This must have taken place before +March 4, 1308–9, when Edward conferred on Sir Adam de +Gordon Randolph's forfeited manor of Stichill, in Roxburghshire. +Never afterwards did Randolph swerve from +his uncle's allegiance.</p> + +<p>Early in 1308–9 (January 14, Hemingburgh; February +12, Lanercost chronicle), there came papal envoys to +Edward and Bruce, at the instance of the French king, +and a truce was made, to run to November 1. But Bruce +is said to have ignored it in practice, and perhaps that is +why a new sentence of excommunication was fulminated +against him and his adherents in the summer of 1309. On +June 18, Edward summoned his array; and, on July 30, +he renewed the summons, requiring his army to muster at +Newcastle at Michaelmas, and declaring that the Scots had<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">79</a></span> +'notoriously broken' the truce. Yet, only three days +later (August 2), he authorised the Earl of Ulster to treat +with Bruce for peace; and, on August 21, he renewed the +commission, and granted safe-conducts for Bruce's envoys, +Sir Nigel Campbell and Sir John de Menteith—the captor +of Wallace, who must have joined Bruce before March 16, +when he was present at the St Andrews parliament. Still +Edward hurried on his preparations. He had summoned +auxiliaries from Wales (August 5), and filled afresh the +chief offices in Scotland (August 16); and presently he +appointed the Earl of Gloucester captain of the army of +Scotland (September 14), and despatched fresh wardens +to the Marches (about October 18). Again, however, the +Pope intervened, and on November 29, Edward granted +full powers to four of his magnates to treat in his name for +a truce. The Wardens of the Marches, according to the +Lanercost chronicle, had just forestalled the step by taking +provisional truce till the middle of January; and Edward +extended the period to March 8, and afterwards 'to summer,' +1310—for, says the chronicler, 'the English do not +like to enter Scotland to war before summer, especially because +of the lack of fodder for their horses.' Probably the +extension to summer was arranged by the commission of +seven appointed on February 16, headed by the Bishop of +St Andrews.</p> + +<p>There had been a round year of peace negotiations and +futile truces, with warlike preparation in the background. +On February 24, 1309–10, Bruce's position was strengthened +by a formal recognition of his royal title by a special meeting +of the prelates and other clergy at Dundee. In the +beginning of June 1310, there was an outbreak on the +Border, the Priory of Coldstream being sacked, and the +prioress and nuns dispersed; and in the middle of the +month the English fleet was ordered north to strengthen +Perth and to harass the eastern seaboard. Then, on +August 15, Edward again mustered his army at Newcastle +(Hemingburgh), or at Berwick (Lanercost chronicle). The +Earls of Lancaster, Pembroke (Valence), Warwick, and +Hereford would not accompany him, displeased with his +favour for Gaveston, though professing to be absorbed in +their duties as 'Ordainers'; but they sent their feudal<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">80</a></span> +services. The Earls of Gloucester, Warenne, and Cornwall +(Gaveston), with Percy, Clifford, and many other magnates, +did attend the muster. The expedition, according to Walsingham, +was said to be a mere pretext to excuse the King +from going to France to do fealty for his French possessions. +He dreaded to leave Gaveston 'among his enemies,' +lest that troubler of the realm should 'meet death, prison, +or worse.' 'Such things were said among the people; +whether true or false,' says the chronicler, 'God knows, I +don't.' The expedition crossed the Border early in September, +and passed by Selkirk, Roxburgh, Biggar, Lanark, +Glasgow, to Renfrew, back to Linlithgow, and thence to +Berwick. The progress occupied just over two months. +Bruce stood aloof; on October 6, when Edward was at +Biggar, he was reported to be with his forces 'on a moor +near Stirling.' Fordun says there was famine in Scotland +this year, many being reduced 'to feed on the flesh of +horses and other unclean cattle.' But Edward was liberally +supplied by the religious houses with 'oxen, cows, wethers, +wheat, oats, barley, malt, beans, and peas,' besides friendly +contributions from other quarters. On November 22, he +issued a proclamation prohibiting the importation of provisions +from England.</p> + +<p>When Edward withdrew from Linlithgow, Bruce hung +upon his rear through Lothian, severely harassing the +army, and all local sympathisers. Walsingham records +an instance. A party of English and Welsh had gone out +to plunder, supported by cavalry. Bruce suddenly attacked +from ambush, and, though aid quickly arrived, he killed 300, +and retired as suddenly as he had advanced. 'Indeed,' +says the chronicler, 'I should extol Bruce, whose policy +was to fight thus and not in open field, but for his lying +under the charge of homicide and the brand of treachery.'</p> + +<p>Edward wintered at Berwick. Bruce seems to have +actively developed offensive operations on the west coast, +to draw him home by a flank attack, as well as to obtain +supplies. For, on December 15 and 16, Edward roused +his officers in the north-western counties, and in Wales +and Ireland, to counteract Bruce's reported purpose 'to +send his whole fleet in the present winter to take the Isle +of Man, and seize all the supplies therein for the sustenance<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">81</a></span> +of his men.' Bruce's adherents in Man are stated +to have caused much trouble and mischief. A week before +Christmas, Clifford and Sir Robert Fitz Pain met Bruce at +Selkirk to discuss terms of peace, and another interview +was arranged with the Earls of Gloucester and Cornwall +near Melrose; but 'it was said,' writes a high official on +February 19, 'that Bruce had been warned by some that +he would be taken, and therefore departed, so that they +have had no parley.'</p> + +<p>A memorandum, undated, but assignable to 1307–10, +addressed by the 'Commune' of Scotland to Edward and +his great officers in the country, affords a glimpse of the +English high-handedness that always did—and does—so +much to thwart the English policy. The Commons represent +that 'though they have purchased a truce for the +safety of the country and their allegiance, and included +the castles and towns in their bounds—namely, the sheriffdoms +of Berwick, Roxburgh, and Edinburgh,' yet 'some +of the sheriffs allow no goods to leave their castles, or their +garrisons to pay for what they buy'—the sheriff of Edinburgh, +in particular—'and the country is so poor that +they cannot get on without ready money.' Again, 'when +the enemy's people come to bargain under the truce, +their goods are taken by some of the castellans and King's +officers, endangering the truce, as the robbers are harboured +in the castles.' They earnestly plead for redress of such +oppressions, and complain that the King's former letters +on the subject have been suppressed by the officers inculpated. +Only an occupation in overwhelming force could +stand against such a course of official misconduct. Meantime +this fatal administrative weakness was greatly counterbalanced +by the political divisions among the Scots.</p> + +<p>In 1310–11, Gaveston, for whom Edward could find no +resting-place elsewhere, was established as lieutenant north +of Forth and warden of Dundee and Perth. 'It is said,' +writes a high official, anonymous, on April 4, 1311, 'that +Bruce meant to fight with the Earl of Cornwall' (Gaveston): +but either he was unable to do so, or deemed it prudent to +weary out the enemy by harassing evasion. On April 9, +Edward issued instructions hastening the outfit of the +fleet destined for the coast of Argyll under Sir John of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">82</a></span> +that ilk—'seeing it is one of the greatest movements of +the Scottish war'; and throughout May and June great +pressure was brought to bear upon the ports of England +and Ireland, though not always with effect. On July 14, +the muster of the army at Roxburgh was postponed to the +1st of August. 'This expedition,' said Edward, 'lies especially +close to our heart.'</p> + +<p>Edward, however, was in deep trouble with his +'Ordainers,' and Bruce was beforehand with him. On +August 12, Bruce burst into England at the Solway, +burned the whole of Gilsland, the town of Haltwhistle, +and great part of Tyndale, returning to Scotland in eight +days with great droves of cattle. The Lanercost chronicler +admits that he killed few besides those that offered resistance, +and that, though he took several of the canons, and +did infinite mischief during the three days he made the +monastery his headquarters, yet he released the canons of +his own accord. The latter episode is recorded as a separate +foray, but probably it belongs to the August operations.</p> + +<p>The same chronicler gives an account of a more serious +raid on September 8, by Harbottle, Holystone and Redesdale, +down to Corbridge and back through Tyndale, +occupying fifteen days. The Wardens of the Marches, +he says, could offer no resistance, and confined their +efforts to wasting the country in anticipation of the Scots, +only 'they did not burn houses or slay men.' The stress +of opposition fell upon the Bishop of Durham. Both +Edward and the Bishop paint the invasion in the usual +lurid colours. At the same time the people had certainly +not been handled with tenderness. The Northumbrians +protected themselves by payment of £2000 for a respite +till February 2, 1311–12. In the middle of December +Bruce appears to have made another raid into England; and +on January 26, 1311–12, Edward appointed six commissioners +to treat in his name for truce with the Scots.</p> + +<p>The rising power of Bruce is variously testified otherwise +than by the progress of his army. The Lanercost chronicler +admits that, in spite of the adherence of so many Scots to +the English side, 'their hearts, though not their persons, were +always with their countrymen.'</p> + +<p>An inquisition at Edinburgh on February 20, mentions<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">83</a></span> +seven landed knights and others that had gone over to +Bruce in the past three or four years, including Sir Robert +de Keith, Sir Thomas de la Haye, and Sir Edmund de +Ramsay. Again, a list of land rewards to Sir Robert +de Hastang on March 20 mentions twelve, among whom +are Sir David de Brechin (who, however, is made warden +of Berwick on April 20, though Sir Edmund de Hastings +receives the post on May 3), Sir Alexander de Lindsay, +Sir Geoffrey de Mowbray, and Sir Herbert de Maxwell. +In five hard years Bruce had recovered three parts of his +kingdom, and carried fire and sword through the English +March.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">84</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_VIII" id="CHAPTER_VIII">CHAPTER VIII</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">RECOVERY OF FORTRESSES</span></h2> + +<p>Bruce was now in a position to turn his main energies +against the strongholds still in English occupation.</p> + +<p>Towards the end of March 1312 he was preparing to +besiege Berwick with an unusually large force. But the +operations are not known; and, in any case, they were +soon postponed. On April 26, he held a parliament at +Ayr, and carefully settled the succession to the throne.</p> + +<p>The dissensions between Edward and his barons appear +to have induced Bruce to carry the war into the enemy's +territory. While the incensed barons were hunting down +Gaveston, he raided the March again, took tribute, burned +Norham, and carried off prisoners and booty. Again, in +the end of June, after Gaveston was beheaded, Bruce made +another foray into the episcopate of Durham. He burnt +Hexham, and dealt so severely with the Priory, that even +in 1320, it is said, the canons were unable to return, while +their collectors were still 'wandering about in the country +in 1326, with the archbishop's brief, in quest of funds for +the canons and their church.' It may have been on this +occasion that Bruce sent Douglas to pillage the region of +Hartlepool. It is, no doubt, in reference to a subsequent +raid, that the Lanercost chronicler tells how a detachment +entered Durham on market day, burned most of the +town, and slew all that resisted, but did not touch the +castle or the abbey. The episcopate compounded for +peace till next midsummer at £2000, the Scots bargaining +for free passage 'whenever they wanted to ride further +into England!' The Palatinate Register records the date +as August 16. The Northumbrians, too, paid down £2000; +Westmorland, Coupland, and Cumberland also paid +ransom—money in part, and for the rest hostages, 'sons +of the greater lords of the country.' And meantime<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">85</a></span> +Edward was squabbling with his barons. It was enough +to make his martial father rise from his grave.</p> + +<p>At last, on December 6, the Lanercost chronicle relates, +Bruce suddenly pounced upon Berwick. His men had +placed two ladders, and 'he would soon have had the +castle, as is believed,' had the garrison not been warned +by the barking of a dog. The ladders, says the chronicler, +'were of a remarkable make, as I myself, who write this, +witnessed with my own eyes.' He describes ladders of +ropes, with wooden steps, and iron hooks to grip the +wall top. The alarm being raised, Bruce retired, leaving +the two ladders for the monk's inspection. 'So a dog on +that occasion saved the town, as once geese by their +cackling saved Rome.'</p> + +<p>Bruce turned north to Perth. According to the Lanercost +chronicle, he took the town by surprise in the night +of January 10 (Fordun says January 8), 1312–13. The +governor, Sir William Oliphant—probably this is the +capture of Perth antedated by Barbour—'was bound and +sent to the islands afar'; but, if so, he did not stay long +there, for he was in England within two months, and +on October 21, he obtained a safe-conduct to return to +Scotland. The chronicler says that Bruce slew the better +Scots burgesses, but permitted the English to go free; +while Fordun records that he put 'the disloyal people, +Scots and English alike,' to the sword. 'In his clemency,' +adds Fordun, 'he spared the rabble, and granted forgiveness +to such as asked it; but he destroyed the walls and +dykes, and consumed everything else with fire.'</p> + +<p>Bruce next swept down upon Dumfries. Here his old +enemy, Sir Dougal MacDowall, constable of the castle, +had experienced much difficulty all through summer and +autumn in obtaining adequate supplies. He gave up the +castle to Bruce on February 7, the short siege probably +indicating that he was starved into surrender. It is likely, +as Mr Bain surmises, that Buittle, Dalswinton, Lochmaben, +and Carlaverock were all recovered about the same time.</p> + +<p>The Scots appear to have derived considerable supplies +from Flanders. On February 15, 1312–13, Edward remonstrated +with the Count of Flanders, begging him to +restrain his subjects from all intercourse with Scotsmen.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">86</a></span> +The Count seized the occasion to demand compensation +for losses and injuries inflicted on his subjects by Englishmen. +An English commission, much to the disgust of +the Flemish envoys, rejected the claims; and presently +Flemish seamen plundered English vessels, the chief +depredator being the ingenious John Crab, whom we +shall meet again. On May 1, 1313, Edward invited the +Count to send his aggrieved subjects back to London; +but 'now,' he added, 'we hear that thirteen ships of +your power, laden with arms and victuals, quite lately +crossed from the port of Swyn to Scotland—whereat we +very much marvel.' The Flemish quarrel went on; but +on May 17, at the instance of the French king, Edward +appointed four commissioners 'to negotiate a truce or +sufferance with the Scots.'</p> + +<p>Within a week, however, as Edward was on the point +of embarking for France to confer with Philip about +Gascony, he learned from a special messenger from the +lieges of Cumberland that the Scots were again upon +them. He could only tell them to do their best, and +he would hasten back to take order for their safety. On +June 6, Bishop Kellawe of Durham testifies to the forlorn +state of the nuns of Halistan on the March; there are +hostile incursions daily, goods and cattle are reived, and +the very nuns are insulted and persecuted by the robbers, +and driven from their homes suffering miserably. Such +are examples of the state of affairs in the mind of the +Lanercost chronicler when he records that 'the people +of Northumberland, Westmorland, and Cumberland, and +other men of the Marches, neither having nor hoping +from their King defence or aid, he being then in the +remote parts of England and not appearing to trouble +himself about them, offered no moderate amount—nay, +a very large amount—of money to Robert for truce till +September 29, 1314.' Bruce was striking hard and persistently, +and Edward was giving way all along the line +of war.</p> + +<p>On his return, indeed, Edward at once took measures +of retaliation. As early as April 2, he had answered +applications from Northumberland for aid by a promise +of relief before midsummer—a promise that remained<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">87</a></span> +unfulfilled. On July 6, he demanded a subsidy from the +bishops, and on August 13 he made a like appeal to the +abbots and convents. In warlike mood, in the end of +July, he had ordered something like a press-gang muster +of boats at the ports from the Wash round to Plymouth. +It was but a spasmodic effort of weakness. About the +beginning of October, Sir Ralph Fitz William reported +that 'they are grievously menaced with treason at Berwick, +but, if the garrison are loyal, they will defend it against +the King of France and the King of Scotland for a while +till succour reaches them.' In the end of next month, +the Bishop of St Andrews proceeded to France in the +interest of Edward, no doubt with the object of detaching +Philip from co-operation with Bruce. It was a fatuous +choice of an envoy.</p> + +<p>The wretched inefficiency of Edward had by this time +rendered the position of his adherents in Scotland all but +insupportable. In November they despatched the Earl +of March and Sir Adam de Gordon to lay their grievances +before him. Their petition recounts their heavy losses +at the hands of the enemy during the past three years; +their costly purchase of truce; and especially their intolerable +sufferings from the lawless outrages committed upon +them by the garrisons of Berwick and Roxburgh, who are +alleged to have plundered, killed, and held them to ransom +at will, as if they had been enemies. Here is a substantial +repetition of the memorandum of 1307–10. Sir Adam de +Gordon could tell how he had himself been arrested by +the constable of Roxburgh Castle and required to find +security for his good behaviour. The King, replying on +November 28, could only give them the cold comfort +of an assurance of his intention to march to their relief +at next midsummer. It is quite natural that such slackness +of the central authority should have given head to +such marauding scoundrels on the Border as Sir Gilbert de +Middleton and Thomas de Pencaitland. That notorious +knight of the road, Sir Gilbert, will cross our path again.</p> + +<p>It could not have been earlier than autumn 1313 that +Bruce recovered the Peel of Linlithgow, which was held +by Sir Archibald de Livingstone, under the orders of Sir +Peter Lubaud, warden and sheriff of Edinburgh. Barbour<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">88</a></span> +makes it harvest time. The peel garrison had cut their +hay, and engaged William Bunnock, a neighbouring +farmer, who hated them patriotically, to 'lead' it for them. +Bunnock conceived the notion of elevating the familiar +harvesting process to an operation of war, and arranged +the strategic details with his friends. He planted an +ambush in the early morning, and let the hay lie till +the peel men had gone out to cut their crop. Loading +the hay, with eight men hid in it, he set a hardy yeoman, +with a hatchet under his belt, to drive the waggon, himself +walking idly beside. When the waggon was half-way +through the gate, Bunnock shouted the signal, 'Thief! +Call all! Call all!' The driver instantly severed the +traces, stopping the waggon; Bunnock slew the porter; +the eight men leapt down from the midst of the hay, +and the ambush swarmed up. They slew the men they +found in garrison, and pursued those that were in the +fields towards Edinburgh and Stirling, killing some in +their flight. For this exploit Bruce rewarded Bunnock +worthily. The peel he at once demolished. The story +of Bunnock rests on the sole authority of Barbour.</p> + +<p>The next castle to fall was Roxburgh. Douglas had +been keeping the Forest, and harassing Roxburgh and +Jedburgh castles. Resolving to win Roxburgh, he got a +handy man, Simon of the Leadhouse, to make him ladders +of hempen ropes, with strong wooden steps and iron hooks, +after the Berwick pattern. Then gathering some sixty men, +he approached the castle on Fastern's Even (Shrove Tuesday), +February 27, 1313–14, and waited till dark. The party +left their horses, put black frocks over their armour, and +crept forward on all fours like cattle. The deception succeeded; +Barbour says they overheard the garrison jesting +at the expense of the neighbouring farmer, who, they +imagined, had left his cattle at large to be carried off by +the Douglas. The click of a hook on the wall attracted +a sentinel, but Simon, who had mounted first, stabbed the +man dead, and the party quickly scaled the wall. The +garrison were making merry in the hall, when the Scots +burst in upon them with the Douglas war-cry. A sharp +conflict ensued. At length Sir William de Fiennes, the +constable, a valorous Gascon, retreated to the great tower.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">89</a></span> +With daylight, the Scots plied the tower with arrows, and +eventually wounded Sir William so badly in the face that +he yielded, on terms that he and his men should pass safe +to England. Douglas conducted them over the Border, +and Sir William soon afterwards died of his wound. Bruce +sent his brother Sir Edward to demolish the castle. Sir +Edward, says Barbour, secured all Teviotdale except Jedburgh +and other places near the English border. On main +points Barbour is corroborated by Sir Thomas Gray and +the Lanercost chronicler.</p> + +<p>The news of the capture of Roxburgh stimulated the +rivalry of Randolph, who was besieging Sir Peter Lubaud +in Edinburgh Castle. Hopeless of taking the place by +assault, Randolph cast about for some likely stratagem, +when William Francis (or William the Frenchman), one +of his men, suggested a plan of extreme boldness. Francis, +according to Barbour, stated that he had at one time lived +in the castle, and, having a sweetheart in the town, had +been accustomed to climb the sheer rock in the darkest +nights. All that was needed was good nerve, and a twelve-foot +ladder for the wall on the top. So, on a dark night—Fordun +gives March 14, 1313–14—Randolph, with thirty +picked men, essayed the adventurous ascent. About half +way up they stopped to rest. Here their nerves were dramatically +tested. One of the watch overhead threw down a +stone, exclaiming 'Away! I see you well.' It was a mere +joke, the sentry saw nothing; and the stone passed harmlessly +over them. The watchmen passed on without suspicion, +and Randolph with his men hastened up the steeper +and steeper crag to the foot of the wall. Instantly the +ladder was fixed, Francis mounting first, then Sir Andrew +Gray, and Randolph himself third. Before all the party got +over the watch was alarmed, the cry of 'Treason! Treason!' +resounded through the castle, and a desperate struggle +ensued. Randolph himself was very sorely bested, but he +succeeded in killing the commandant; whereupon the garrison +gave in. The Lanercost chronicler states that a strong +assault was made on the south gate—the only point reasonably +open to assault—where the garrison offered a vigorous +resistance; and that the party mounting the rock on the +north side under cover of this front attack, having surprised<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">90</a></span> +and overcome the defenders, opened the gate to their comrades. +Sir Peter Lubaud, the warden, says Barbour, had +been deposed from the command of the garrison on account +of some suspicious intercourse with the enemy, and was +found by Randolph in prison in fetters. He became +Bruce's man, but soon afterwards he fell under suspicion +of treason, and, by Bruce's order, was drawn and hanged +(Gray)—or at any rate put in prison, where he died miserably +(John of Tynmouth). The Lanercost writer states that +the victors 'slew the English,' probably meaning the garrison; +but the extant rolls show that there were many +Scotsmen in the garrison, 'two of them,' as Mr Bain remarks, +even 'bearing the surname of Douglas.' Bruce +demolished the castle.</p> + +<p>Barbour states that Sir Edward Bruce, having won all +Galloway and Nithsdale, and taken Rutherglen Peel and +Dundee Castle, laid siege to Stirling Castle from Lent to +midsummer, 1313; and that then Sir Philip de Mowbray, +the constable, agreed to yield the castle, provided it were +not relieved by midsummer 1314. The most recklessly +chivalrous terms are indeed consonant with Sir Edward's +character. But if, as Barbour and the Monk of Malmesbury +agree, Mowbray was influenced by a threatened failure of +provisions, the period must have been much less. He +in Stirling would hardly be in any better case for supplies +than was MacDowall in Dumfries. Immediately on investment +of the castle, he would begin to feel the pinch; +and the fall of Edinburgh would at once intimate the +hopelessness of his position. But, further, we have seen +Sir Edward demolishing Roxburgh Castle in early March, +and it does not seem likely that he would have left a +substitute to look after Stirling. Besides, the Lanercost +chronicler can hardly be mistaken when he says that +Sir Edward entered England on April 17, taking up his +headquarters at the Bishop's manor house at Rose, and +sending his army as far as Englewood Forest, south +and west, for three days to burn and plunder—because +the tribute had not been duly paid. Once more, the +Monk of Malmesbury represents that it was after the +fall of the other castles that Mowbray carried to Edward +the news of his agreement for surrender. On the whole,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">91</a></span> +it may be seriously doubted whether the respite extended +beyond a couple of months, or even six weeks. It is not, +apparently, till May 27, that Mowbray's conditional agreement +for surrender is mentioned in any existing official +document.</p> + +<p>Besides Stirling, the only fortresses of any importance +that now remained in the hands of the English were +Berwick, Jedburgh, and Bothwell. But the immediate +interest centres in the fateful attempt to relieve the castle +of Stirling.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">92</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_IX" id="CHAPTER_IX">CHAPTER IX</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">THE BATTLE OF BANNOCKBURN.</span></h2> + +<p>As far back as December 23, Edward II. had summoned his +army to assemble at Berwick on June 10, 1314, for the war +against Scotland. In March, he was busily ordering his +fleet for service on the east and west coasts, and hastening +the muster of the Irish contingent under the Lord of Ulster. +On May 27, from New Abbey, he issued an urgent reminder +to the sheriffs and barons of the northern and midland +counties to have their men at Wark by June 10. He has +learnt, he tells them, that the Scots are massing great +numbers of foot in strong positions protected by marshes +and all but inaccessible to cavalry; and he fires their +zeal by informing them of the agreement of Mowbray to +surrender the castle of Stirling unless the siege be raised +by midsummer day. Bruce, then, had already chosen +his ground, and commenced his measures of defence.</p> + +<p>The English and Welsh troops summoned on May 27, +numbered together 21,540. The numbers of the Irish +contingent are not preserved, but, on analogous cases, +they can hardly be reckoned beyond 3000. The Gascons, +Hainaulters, and other foreigners are not likely to have +numbered more than the Irish. 'After allowing,' with Mr +Bain, '10,000 light horsemen and 3000 heavy cavalry, the +whole English army probably did not exceed 50,000'—at +the very outside. The Earls of Lancaster, Warenne, +Arundel, and Warwick did not join the expedition, on the +ostensible ground that the King had not first consulted +Parliament in conformity with the Ordinances, and thus +they would be laid open to ecclesiastical censure; but they +sent their feudal services. The outfit of the army was on +the most ample, not to say magnificent, scale. 'The +multitude of waggons, if extended one after another in +file,' says the Monk of Malmesbury, 'would have stretched<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">93</a></span> +over twenty leagues.' In truth, he says, it was universally +acknowledged that 'such an army did not go out of England +in our time.' The Monk's testimony lends a sober +colour to the assertion of Robert Baston, the Carmelite +friar that went to celebrate an English victory and was +captured and made to sing the Scottish triumph. 'Never,' +he declared, 'was seen a more splendid, noble, or proud +English army.'</p> + +<p>There is no definite clue to the numbers of the Scots. +'But,' as Mr Bain says, 'in so poor and thinly populated a +country, devastated by long war, 15,000 or 16,000 would +be a fair estimate of the comrades of Bruce. The Scots, +twenty years later, could raise no more for the almost +equally important object of relieving Berwick.'</p> + +<p>The estimates usually given follow Barbour, who says +there were over 100,000 English—enough 'to conquer the +whole world'—and some 50,000 Scots, of whom 30,000 +were fighting men. No doubt Barbour includes in the +English 100,000 the miscellaneous 'pitaille,' or rascalry, +that swarmed about the baggage trains of mediæval armies. +But Mr Bain's estimate seems to be as near as the authorities +will admit. The proportion of English to Scots was most +probably somewhere about three to one.</p> + +<p>The army that mustered under Edward was indeed 'very +fair and great,' yet, in the eye of the Church—probably +enlightened by later events—there was one needful thing +lacking. When Edward I. was on the warpath towards +Scotland, says the Lanercost chronicler, 'he was wont to +visit on his way the saints of England—Thomas of Canterbury, +Edmund, Hugh, William, Cuthbert—and to offer +them fair oblations, to commend himself to their prayers, +and to dispense large gifts to the monasteries and the +poor'; but his degenerate son, omitting these pious +duties,' came with great pomp and circumstance, took the +goods of the monasteries on his route, and, it was stated, +did and said some things to the prejudice and injury of the +saints,' by reason whereof 'certain religious of England +prophesied' that no good would come of the expedition. +To the same effect, Robert of Reading records that Edward +permitted his troops, on their march, to ravage with violence +the patrimony of 'religious' and other churchmen, as if<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">94</a></span> +they had been robbers (<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">more prædonum</i>). Still the Archbishop +of York and the Bishop of Durham, rehearsing the +long list of Bruce's alleged enormities, officially enjoined +all within their jurisdiction to pray for the success of +the King's arms, offering an indulgence of forty days in +reward of such patriotic piety.</p> + +<p>The King was in high spirits over the splendour of his +army. Apparently he anticipated an easy and complete +triumph. He started from Berwick only a few days before +the fateful day of St John. 'From day to day,' says the +Monk of Malmesbury, 'he hastened to the place fixed on +beforehand, not like a man leading an army to battle, but +rather as if he were going on pilgrimage to Compostella. +Short was the stay for sleep; shorter still the stay for +food; in consequence of which the horses, horsemen, +and foot were worn out by labour and fatigue.' On Friday, +June 21, the English army lay at Edinburgh; and on +Saturday it lay at Falkirk, little more than ten miles from +Stirling.</p> + +<p>The problem for Bruce was to keep the English out of +Stirling till St John's day had passed. In good time he +had selected and laid out the inevitable field of battle with +military prescience of the first order. He had mustered +his forces in the Torwood, in a position commanding the +approach to Stirling from the south; and on the morning +of Saturday, the 22nd of June, on news of the approach of +the English, he marched them to the chosen spot on a +plain some two miles south of Stirling within the last large +loop of the Bannock Burn, called the New Park—a hunting-ground +of the Scots kings. The Park was a piece of firm +ground rising on the north and west into the swelling ridges +of Coxet Hill near St Ninian's, and Gillies Hill on the left +of the Bannock above the bend towards the Forth. Eastwards +it fell away into a marshy tract filling the angle of +the two rivers and intersected by watercourses. Southwards, +too, the hard ground was broken by two morasses—Halbert's +Bog and Milton Bog—between the Park and the +Bannock. Bruce rested his right wing on the steep bank +of the Bannock below Gillies Hill; his left wing stretched +away past St Ninian's nearly to the gates of Stirling; his +rear was protected by Gillies Hill and the Bannock behind.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">95</a></span> +The English would be compelled to advance either across +the Bannock between Parkmill and Beaton's Mill—a +breadth of a short mile, free from precipitous banks—to +the line of hard ground, with a contracted front, to be +immediately divided by the intervening bogs; or else +along the line of low and marshy flat between the Park and +the Forth. To reduce the superiority of the English +cavalry, Bruce had industriously dug pits along the parts +of the firm route by which they would probably, if not +inevitably advance—pits a foot wide, round, and deep as a +man's knee, honeycombing the ground; and these holes he +covered loosely with a disguise of brushwood, turf, and +grass. He is also said to have inserted in them stakes +shod with iron points. Sir Thomas de la Moore mentions +long transverse trenches, similarly covered so as to bear +men aware of them, but not horses. Later writers add +that Bruce strewed the ground with calthrops, or metal +spikes, to cripple the English horses. He himself had +determined to fight on foot.</p> + +<p>Bruce marshalled his troops in four divisions, facing +south-eastwards. The van was led by Randolph. The +second and third divisions were ranged behind the wings +of the van; the former, to the right and resting on the +Bannock, led by Sir Edward Bruce, the latter by Walter +the Steward ('that then was but a beardless hyne') and +Douglas. The rearguard, consisting of the men of Carrick, +Argyll, Cantyre and the Isles, was stationed right behind +the van at some interval, under the immediate command +of Bruce himself. All the divisions could thus be promptly +massed on the English whether they should select the +higher or the lower line of advance. It was of the very first +importance that no detachment of the English should be +allowed to outmanœuvre the main body of the Scots and +throw themselves into Stirling; and Randolph, who held +the most advanced position, was especially charged to +guard against this fatal contingency. The non-combatants +retired behind the hill in the rear, afterwards named from +them the Gillies' (that is, Servants') Hill.</p> + +<p>The dispositions of the English army are not known in +certain detail. There is little help in Barbour's statement +that it was divided into ten companies of 10,000 each.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">96</a></span> +We know that the van was led by the Earl of Gloucester; +and that, if Robert of Reading and the Monk of Malmesbury +may be relied on, the appointment of Gloucester was +hotly resented by the hereditary constable, the Earl of +Hereford. The King's bridle was attended by Sir Aymer +de Valence and Sir Giles d'Argentine, the latter of whom +was regarded as the third knight in Christendom, and had +been released from captivity at Salonica in the end of the +preceding year through Edward's urgent representations to +the Emperor, and even to the Empress, of Constantinople.</p> + +<p>At sunrise on Sunday, June 23—the eve of St John—the +Scots heard mass. Bruce then devoted special attention +to the pits that were still preparing. After midday—the +Scots observed the fast on bread and water—the +English were reported to be advancing from the fringe +of the Torwood. Bruce issued his final orders. Then +he is said to have addressed his men in terms of high +resolution, bidding every man depart that was not ready +for either alternative—to conquer or to die. Not a +man moved from the ranks. More than five centuries +later, at Balaclava, 'Men,' cried Sir Colin Campbell, 'you +must die where you stand.' 'Ay, ay, Sir Colin, we'll do +that,' was the cheery response. Such, too, was the spirit +of the same race on the field of Bannockburn.</p> + +<p>At this point, according to Barbour, Douglas and Sir +Robert de Keith (hereditary marshal) proceeded, by order +of Bruce, to reconnoitre the enemy's advance. They returned +with such a report of the numbers and equipment +of the English as they deemed it prudent to render to +Bruce only 'in great privity.' Bruce, however, put a bold +face on the situation, and directed them, says Barbour, +to spread a depreciatory account of the enemy.</p> + +<p>The main body of the English appears to have halted +while the leaders should take counsel. But Gloucester, +with the vanguard, ignorant of this and ardent for the fray, +dashed through the Bannock and advanced on the Park, +where Sir Edward Bruce was ready to receive him. King +Robert himself was riding in front of Sir Edward's division +on a small palfrey, with only a battle-axe in hand. On his +basnet, according to Barbour's haberdashery, he wore a +hat of jacked leather, surmounted by 'a high crown, in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">97</a></span> +token that he was a king.' Some of the English knights, +says the Monk of Malmesbury, rode out between the lines +and flung their challenges to the Scots. Sir Henry de +Bohun, a knight of the house of Hereford, spurred at +Bruce himself, and Bruce, swerving at the critical moment +of attack, rose in his stirrups as de Bohun passed and clove +his head at a stroke, the shaft of his axe shivering in his +hand. It may be remarked incidentally that Gray calls +the luckless knight Sir Piers de Mountforth. The Scots +pressed forward; the English fell back; but Bruce prudently +soon recalled his men from the conflict. The +Monk of Malmesbury, however, acknowledges that there +was 'sufficiently keen fighting, in which Gloucester was +unhorsed.' It is not surprising that the leading Scots +remonstrated earnestly with Bruce for exposing himself +to such an unequal chance. According to Barbour, he +made no answer, only regretting the breaking of his good +axe-shaft. There can hardly be any doubt that Bruce took +the risk deliberately, in calculated reliance on his dexterity +and strength, and not without a judicious eye to the moral +effect on both armies. The feat, in any case, damped the +ardour of the English and raised the spirit of the Scots.</p> + +<p>Almost contemporaneously with the advance of Gloucester, +Clifford and Beaumont, with 300 men-at-arms—Gray, +whose father rode with them, says 300, while +Barbour makes them 800—hurried along the lower +ground on the English right towards Stirling. Their +evident object, as Barbour says, was to relieve the +castle; but the Lanercost chronicler ingenuously explains +that it was to prevent the Scots from escaping by flight. +Randolph, strangely ill-served by his scouts and by his +eyes, if Barbour be right, is said not to have been aware +of the movement till he received a sharp message from +Bruce (as if Bruce's attention was not fully engaged elsewhere), +telling him significantly that a rose had fallen +from his chaplet. This is sheer monkish imagination. Gray +makes no mention of this incredible inadvertence, but +represents Randolph as fired by the news of Bruce's repulse +of the English van; and the Lanercost chronicler +states that the Scots deliberately allowed the advance of +the party. Of course they did; Randolph undoubtedly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">98</a></span> +descried them the moment they debouched on the carse. +To do so was no less important than it was for Sir Edward +to be ready for Gloucester's onset. The next step for +Randolph was to tackle his enemy at the right spot and +not elsewhere. With a strong detachment he rapidly +traversed the wooded edge of the Park, so as to converge +upon the English horsemen at the narrow neck +between St Ninian's and the Forth—the only point, in +fact, where he could calculate upon holding them without +moving his whole division down into the low-lying ground +(if even that would have done it), and deranging the order +of battle. When they were 'neath the kirk,' he issued +from the wood and menaced their further progress.</p> + +<p>'Let us retire a little,' said Beaumont; 'let them come; +give them the fields.'</p> + +<p>'Sir,' remarked Sir Thomas Gray, the elder, 'I suspect +if you give them so much now, they will have all only too +soon.'</p> + +<p>'Why,' rejoined Beaumont tartly, 'if you are afraid you +can flee.'</p> + +<p>'Sir,' replied Gray, 'it is not for fear that I shall flee +this day.'</p> + +<p>Whereupon Sir Thomas spurred his steed between Beaumont +and Sir William d'Eyncourt and charged the Scots. +Randolph, whose men were on foot, instantly threw them +into a schiltron, 'like a hedgehog.' D'Eyncourt was slain at +the first onset. Gray's horse was speared and he himself +was taken prisoner. The horsemen were wholly unable to +make the slightest impression on the schiltron: they could +not ride down the Scots; they could only cast spears and +other missiles into their midst. Occasionally, on the other +hand, a Scot would leap out from the ranks and strike down +horse or rider. Douglas, seeing the Scots surrounded, +entreated Bruce to permit him to go to Randolph's aid. +Bruce, however, sternly refused to disorder his array, but +at last yielded to his importunity. The temporary absence +of Douglas and a small party could not really matter at the +moment, and it was wise to make doubly sure of the vital +object dependent on Randolph's defence. On getting near, +however, and perceiving that Randolph was holding his own, +Douglas chivalrously halted his men. But his appearance<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">99</a></span> +was not without effect upon the English party. They gave up +the contest. The movement had completely failed. Some +of them straggled to Stirling Castle; the main body of the +survivors fled back the way they had come; and Randolph +returned in triumph. It may be, as Barbour says, that +Bruce used the occasion to deliver to his men another +rousing address. At any rate he had gained a marked +success in each of the operations of the day.</p> + +<p>Though Gloucester had retired, apparently he did not +withdraw beyond the Bannock, but encamped for the +night along the north bank. According to the unanimous +testimony of the chroniclers, the English host was struck +with serious discouragement. It may have been, as +Barbour says, that they talked in groups disconsolately +and forebodingly, and that the encouragement of the +leaders predicting victory in the great battle on the morrow +failed to shake off their depression. Still there was activity +in the vanguard camp. Barbour says that at night efforts +were made to render bad parts of the low-lying land in the +angle of the rivers passable, and even that aid in this work +was furnished by the Stirling garrison. According to the +Malmesbury chronicler, the English anticipated attack in +the night; and Gray states that they lay under arms, their +horses being ready bridled. Bruce, however, had resolutely +restricted himself to the tactics of defence; but the anticipation +was a natural one enough. Some of the men, very +probably, sought artificial means of consolation and courage. +Sir Thomas de la Moore, following Baston, pictures the +English camp as a lamentable and unwonted scene of +drunkenness, men 'shouting "Wassail" and "Drinkhail" +beyond ordinary'; and he sets forth, in forcible contrast, +the quiet self-restraint and patriotic confidence of the Scots.</p> + +<p>In all the circumstances, it would seem an inexplicable +thing that the Scots should have been on the point of +retiring in the night and making for the fastnesses of the +Lennox. Yet Gray records that such was their intention. +Sir Alexander de Seton, he says, came secretly from the +English host to Bruce, and told him that they had lost +heart, and would certainly give way before a vigorous onset +next day; whereupon Bruce changed his plans and braced +himself to fight on the morrow. The Scots had, indeed,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">100</a></span> +'done enough for the day,' but they had not done enough +for the occasion. Stirling Castle might yet be relieved. It +is likely enough that Seton visited Bruce, and that there +were weak-kneed warriors in Bruce's lines; but that the +matter of the interview is correctly reported by Gray seems +absolutely incredible.</p> + +<p>On the morning of St John's day, June 24, the Scots +heard mass at sunrise, broke their fast, and lined up with +all banners displayed. Bruce made some new knights, +and created Walter the Steward and Douglas bannerets. +He then made fresh dispositions of his troops, in view of +the position of the English van along the Bannock. +There, clearly, the battle would be fought. Accordingly, +he brought forward Randolph's division from the wood, +placing it probably by the north-west corner of Halbert's +Bog, almost parallel to Sir Edward's division; while the +third division lay across the south-east slopes of Coxet +Hill. The formation was in echelon by the right, with +unequal intervals. Behind the general line, the rear +division stretched from the south-west slopes of Coxet +Hill towards Gillies Hill.</p> + +<p>The Scottish array appears to have made a deeper impression +on the English veterans than on the English king. +The Malmesbury chronicler states that the more experienced +leaders advised that the battle should be postponed +till the following day, partly because of the solemn +feast, partly because of the fatigue of the soldiery. The +advice was scorned by the younger knights. It was supported, +however, by Gloucester, himself a youthful knight. +On him, it is said, the King turned with vehement indignation, +charging him even with treason and double-dealing. +'To-day,' replied the Earl, 'it will be clear that I am +neither traitor nor double-dealer'; and he addressed +himself to preparation for battle.</p> + +<p>The Scots seem to have made but a paltry show in the +eyes of Edward. 'What! Will yonder Scots fight?' he is +said to have asked his attendant knights, incredulously. +Sir Ingram de Umfraville assured him they would; at the +same time suggesting that the English should feign to +retire, and so draw the Scots from their ranks to plunder, +when they would fall easy victims. Neither did this suggestion<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">101</a></span> +jump with the high humour of Edward. At the +moment, he observed the Scottish ranks falling on their +knees as the Abbot of Inchaffray passed along the lines, +bearing aloft the crucifix.</p> + +<p>'Yon folk kneel to ask for mercy,' he exclaimed.</p> + +<p>'Sire,' said Umfraville, 'ye say sooth now; they crave +mercy, but not of you; it is to God they cry for their +trespasses. I tell you of a surety, yonder men will win +all or die.'</p> + +<p>'So be it!' cried Edward, 'we shall soon see.' And +he ordered the trumpets to sound the charge.</p> + +<p>At the very moment when the hostile armies were closing +in stern conflict, says the Monk of Malmesbury, Gloucester +and Hereford were in hot wrangle over the question of +precedence; and Gloucester sprang forward, 'inordinately +bent on carrying off a triumph at the first onset.' His +heavy cavalry, though hampered for space and disconcerted +by the treacherous pits, went forward gallantly, +under the cover of a strong force of archers, who severely +galled the Scots, and even drove back their bowmen. They +crashed against Sir Edward Bruce's division, which received +them 'like a dense hedge' or 'wood.' The great horses +with their eager riders dashed themselves in vain against +the solid and impenetrable schiltron. Those behind pressed +forward, only to bite the dust, like their comrades, under +the spears and axes of the Scots. 'There,' says the Monk +of Malmesbury, 'the horrible crash of splintered spears, the +terrible clangour of swords quivering on helmets, the insupportable +force of the Scottish axes, the fearsome cloud +of arrows and darts discharged on both sides, might have +shaken the courage of the very stoutest heart. The redoubling +of blow on blow, the vociferation of encouragements, +the din of universal shouting, and the groans of the dying, +could be heard farther than may be said.' The Lanercost +writer goes near to justifying Scott's remarkable expression, +'steeds that shriek in agony.' Seldom in history has +there been so fierce a turmoil of battle.</p> + +<p>According to Barbour, Randolph, noting the strain +upon the first division, bore down to Sir Edward's support +and drew an equally heavy attack upon himself. Steadily +the second division won ground, though they seemed lost<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">102</a></span> +in the swarms of the enemy, 'as they were plunged in the +sea.' But not yet did victory incline to either side. Then +Bruce threw into the scale the weight of the third division, +the Steward and Douglas ranging themselves 'beside the +Earl a little by.' With splendid tenacity, the English +grappled with the newcomers in stubborn conflict, till, +Barbour says, 'the blood stood in pools' on the field.</p> + +<p>The engagement was now as general as the nature of +the position allowed. Both sides settled down to steady +hard pounding, and it remained to be seen which would +pound the hardest and the longest.</p> + +<p>The English were at enormous disadvantage in being +unable to bring into action their whole force together. +They could, indeed, supply the gaps in the narrow front +with sheer weight of pressure from the rear, and they took +bold risks on parts of the softer ground, especially along +the north bank of the Bannock; but, even so, the fighting +line was grievously hampered for space, and the wild +career of wounded steeds defied the most strenuous efforts +to preserve order. The archers, however, worked round +to the right of Sir Edward's division, plying their bows +with such energy and discrimination as greatly to disconcert +Sir Edward's men. The moment had come for King +Robert to order into action the marshal, Sir Robert de +Keith, with his handful of 500 horsemen 'armed in steel.' +Keith dashed upon the archers in flank, and scattered +them in flight. This successful operation gave the Scots +archers the opportunity to retaliate with effect, while it +relieved the foremost division to reconcentrate their +energies on the heavy cavalry steadily thundering on their +front. But more English cavalry pressed to occupy the +ground abandoned by the English archers. And now +Bruce appears to have brought his rear division into +action upon the English flank. It was his last resource. +The Scots, says Barbour, 'fought as they were in a rage; +they laid on as men out of wit.' But still the English +disputed every inch of ground with indomitable resolution.</p> + +<p>It was probably about this time that the gallant young +Gloucester fell. After brilliant efforts to penetrate the +impenetrable wedge of Scots, he had his charger slain +under him, and was thrown to the ground. The mishap<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">103</a></span> +is said to have dazed his men, who 'stood as if astonied,' +instead of aiding him to rise, burdened as he was with the +weight of his armour, and possibly trammelled by his +horse. He was thus slain in the midst of the 500 armed +followers he had led into the front of the battle. The +Monk of Malmesbury raises a loud lament over Gloucester's +luckless fate: 'Devil take soldiery,' he exclaims in +pious energy, 'whose courage oozes out at the critical +moment of need.' It may be, however, that others are +right in stating that Gloucester was slain in consequence +of his rash and headlong advance at the very first onset.</p> + +<p>The prolonged and doubtful struggle naturally wearied +out the patience of the non-combatants behind Gillies +Hill. Choosing a captain, says Barbour, they marshalled +themselves—15,000 to 20,000 in number—improvised +banners by fastening sheets on boughs and spears, and +advanced over the brow of the hill in view of the battle +raging below. The English, it is said, believing them to +be a fresh army, were struck with panic. Bruce marking +the effect shouted his war-cry and urged his men to their +utmost efforts. The English van at last yielded ground, +though not at all points. The Scots, however, seized +their advantage, and pressed with all their might. The +English line broke, falling back on the Bannock. Confusion +increased at every step. Horsemen and foot, +gentle and simple, were driven pell-mell into the Bannock, +and but few of them were lucky enough to gain the south +bank; the burn, Barbour says, was 'so full of horses and +men that one might pass over it dry-shod.' The panic +ran through the whole English army. The day was lost +and won.</p> + +<p>King Edward refused to believe the evidence of his +senses, and obstinately refused to quit the field. But it is +the merest bravado—though countenanced by Scott—when +Trokelowe relates how the King, in the bitterness +and fury of his wrath, 'rushed truculently upon the enemy +like a lion robbed of whelps,' copiously shed their blood, +and was with difficulty withdrawn from the orgy of massacre. +Unquestionably he stood aloof from the battle, +watching its progress at a safe distance. When the +English gave way in hopeless rout, Valence and Argentine<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">104</a></span> +seized his rein and hurried him off the field in spite of all +remonstrance. It was not a moment too soon, for already, +says Gray, Scots knights 'hung with their hands on the +trappings of the King's destrier' in a determined attempt +to capture him, and were disengaged only by the King's +desperate wielding of a mace. They had even ripped up +his destrier, so that presently he had to mount another. +Once the King was clear of immediate pursuers, Argentine +directed him to Stirling Castle and bade him farewell. 'I +have not hitherto been accustomed to flee,' he said, 'nor +will I flee now. I commend you to God.' And striking +spurs to his steed he charged furiously upon Sir Edward +Bruce's division, but was quickly borne down and slain.</p> + +<p>The turning of the King's rein was the signal for the +general dispersal of the army in flight.</p> + +<p>King Edward, attended by Valence, Despenser, Beaumont, +Sir John de Cromwell, and some 500 men-at-arms, +made for Stirling Castle. Mowbray, with the plainest +commonsense—the suggestion of treachery is preposterous—begged +him not to stay, for the castle must be surrendered; +in any case, it would be taken. So the King was +conducted in all haste round the Park and the Torwood +towards Linlithgow; the Lanercost writer assigns as guide +'a certain Scots knight, who knew by what ways they +could escape.' But for Bruce's anxious care to keep his +men in hand in case of a rally, it seems quite certain that +Edward would not have escaped at all. Douglas went in +pursuit, but he had only some sixty horsemen. On the +borders of the Torwood he met Sir Lawrence de Abernethy, +who was coming to assist the English, but at once +changed sides on learning the issue of the day, and joined +Douglas in pursuit of the fugitive King. At Linlithgow +Douglas came within bowshot of the royal party, but, not +being strong enough to attack, hung close upon their rear, +capturing or killing the stragglers. The pursuit was continued +hot-foot through Lothian; Douglas</p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i6">'was alwais by thame neir;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">He leit thame nocht haf sic laseir<br /></span> +<span class="i0">As anys wattir for to ma'—<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p class="in0">till at last Edward found shelter in Earl Patrick's castle of +Dunbar. The King, with seventeen of his closest attendants,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">105</a></span> +presently embarked on a vessel for Berwick (Barbour +says Bamborough), 'abandoning all the others,' sneers the +Lanercost writer, 'to their fortune,' These others, according +to Barbour, had not even been admitted to Dunbar +Castle; but Douglas let them go on to Berwick unmolested, +and with a drove of captured horses speedily rejoined +Bruce at Stirling. Sir Thomas de la Moore attributes the +King's escape 'not to the swiftness of his horse, nor to the +efforts of men, but to the Mother of God, whom he invoked,' +vowing to build and dedicate to her a house for +twenty-four poor Carmelites, students of theology. This +vow he fulfilled, in spite of the dissuasion of Despenser, +and the house is now Oriel College, Oxford.</p> + +<p>Another party, headed by the Earl of Hereford, made for +Carlisle. According to the Lanercost chronicler, it included +the Earl of Angus, Sir John de Segrave, Sir Antony +de Lucy, Sir Ingram de Umfraville, and many other +knights, and numbered 600 horse and 1000 foot. They +appealed to the hospitality of Sir Walter Fitz Gilbert, who +held Valence's castle of Bothwell for Edward with a +garrison of sixty Scots. Fitz Gilbert admitted 'the more +noble' of them—Barbour says fifty; the Meaux chronicler, +120; Walsingham, a still larger number. Fitz Gilbert at +once secured them all as prisoners, and delivered them to +Sir Edward Bruce, who was sent with a large force to take +them over. Hereford and others were eventually exchanged +for the Queen, the Princess Marjory, and the +Bishop of Glasgow; the rest were held to heavy ransom. +The main body of the party struggled forward to the +Border, but many of them—Barbour says three-fourths—were +slain or captured. Everywhere, in fact, the inhabitants, +who 'had previously feigned peace' with the English, +rose upon the hapless fugitives. Thus, Sir Maurice de +Berkeley escaped with a great body of Welshmen, but, +says Barbour, many were taken or slain before they +reached England. A large number fled to Stirling Castle, +where Barbour pictures the crags as covered with them; but +these at once surrendered to a detachment of Bruce's force.</p> + +<p>It is hopeless to number the slain that strewed the field +of battle, choked the Bannock, or floated down the Forth. +Barbour says roundly that 30,000 English were slain or<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">106</a></span> +drowned. The Meaux chronicler admits 20,000. Walsingham +numbers no less than 700 knights and squires. +Besides Gloucester and Argentine, the veteran Sir Robert +de Clifford, Sir Pagan de Tybetot, Sir William the Marshal, +Sir William de Vescy, Sir John Comyn (the son of the +Red Comyn, slain at Dumfries), Sir Henry de Bohun, Sir +William D'Eyncourt, and many other notable warriors, +had fallen in the forefront of battle. Sir Edmund de +Mauley, the King's seneschal, was drowned in the Bannock. +The undistinguished many must remain uncounted. +The Scots losses, which, though comparatively insignificant, +must yet have been considerable, are equally beyond +reckoning. The only men of note mentioned are Sir +William Vipont and Sir Walter Ross.</p> + +<p>In dealing with his prisoners, Bruce displayed a princely +generosity. Trokelowe frankly acknowledges that his +handsome liberality gained him immense respect 'even +among his enemies.' Walsingham declares that it 'changed +the hearts of many to love of him.' The Monk of Reading +is fairly astonished. There was no haggling over exchanges +or ransoms, though no doubt many of the ransoms were at +a high figure. Sir Ralph de Monthermer, who was captured +at Stirling, and was an old friend of Bruce's, was +released without ransom, and carried back to England the +King's shield, which Bruce freely returned. Sir Marmaduke +Twenge, a relative of Bruce's, who yielded himself to +the King personally on the day after the battle, was sent +home, not only without ransom, but with handsome gifts. +The bodies of Gloucester and Clifford were freely sent to +Edward at Berwick with every token of respect for gallant +foes; and, while the common men that fell on the field +were interred in common trenches, the more noble were +buried with noble ceremonial 'in holy places.'</p> + +<p>The spoils collected by the victors were enormous. +Walsingham ventures on an estimate of £200,000; 'so +many good nobles, vigorous youths, noble horses, warlike +arms, precious garments and napery, and vessels of gold—all +lost!' Bruce made generous distribution among his +valiant men. The individual ransoms largely increased the +individual acquisitions. 'The whole land,' says Fordun, +'overflowed with boundless wealth.'</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">107</a></span> +The chroniclers labour to assign reasons for the great +disaster. The religious reason seems rather thin; for, if +Edward and his barons broke the Ordinances, and also +fought on a feast day, Bruce and his friends lay under +multiplied excommunications. There is more substance +in other allegations—presumptuous confidence on the part +of the English leaders; discord in their councils; their +impetuous and disorderly advance; the fatigue and hunger +of the men by reason of the rapid march from Berwick. +One would be unwilling to press a certain lack of enthusiasm +for their King, or a suspicion of inadequate generalship. +There is sufficient explanation in the skill, prudence, and +iron resolution of Bruce, supported by able generals of +division, and by brave and patriotic men. Had the result +been otherwise, it would have been, for England, a greater +disaster still.</p> + +<p>'Yet'—and the word of honest sympathy and justification +will not jar now on any generous <span class="locked">mind—</span></p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="iq">'Yet mourn not, Land of Fame!<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Though ne'er the leopards on thy shield<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Retreated from so sad a field<br /></span> +<span class="i4">Since Norman William came.<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Oft may thine annals justly boast<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Of battles stern by Scotland lost;<br /></span> +<span class="i4">Grudge not her victory,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">When for her freeborn rights she strove—<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Rights dear to all who Freedom love,<br /></span> +<span class="i4">To none so dear as thee!'<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<hr /> +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">108</a></span></p> +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_X" id="CHAPTER_X">CHAPTER X</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">INVASION OF ENGLAND AND IRELAND</span></h2> + +<p>The battle of Bannockburn might well have been the +historical, as well as the dramatic, close of the struggle. +But Edward refused to be taught by experience, and the +desultory welter of war was miserably prolonged for nearly +half a generation to come. The disaster rankled in +Edward's mind, ever craving vengeance, impotently. With +childish wilfulness, he would not even concede to Bruce +the formal title of King of Scots, though the Lanercost +chronicler admits that the victory at Bannockburn extorted +a general recognition of his right by conquest.</p> + +<p>Edward retired from Berwick to York. It was plain +that Bruce would instantly follow up his victory, and +already there was anxiety on the Border. Berwick was +not only vexed by the Scots, but still more seriously +menaced by the violence of the Northumbrians, who had +been exasperated by the hanging of a number of their +countrymen for alleged treachery; and the storm burst +upon the north of England before Edward could send up +reinforcements. Before the middle of July, Sir Andrew de +Harcla, the constable of Carlisle, was in daily expectation +of an attack, and complained that he was hampered by +lack of promised support. Bishop Kellawe could not +attend Parliament, so busy was he in preparations for the +defence of his episcopate; 'all the people say that, if he +now leave the district, they will not venture to stay behind.'</p> + +<p>Immediately after the battle, Sir Philip de Mowbray +surrendered Stirling Castle, and passed over to the side +of the victor. Towards the end of July, Sir Edward Bruce +and Douglas, with other Scots nobles, crossed the eastern +Border and ravaged Northumberland, leaving the castles +unassailed. They spared the episcopate of Durham from +fire in consideration of a large sum of money. Crossing<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">109</a></span> +the Tees, they penetrated beyond Richmond, the people +fleeing before them to the south, to the woods, to the +castles. They turned up Swaledale, and on Stainmoor +severely handled Harcla, who had seized the opportunity +of quietness at Carlisle to make a luckless raid upon them. +On their northward march they burnt Brough, Appleby, +Kirkoswald, and other towns, and trampled down the crops +remorselessly. Coupland bought off a visitation. They +re-entered Scotland with many prisoners of price, and with +great droves of cattle. They had met with no resistance, +except Harcla's futile effort. 'The English,' says Walsingham +dolefully, 'had lost so much of their accustomed +boldness that a hundred of them fled from the face of two +or three Scots.'</p> + +<p>On September 9, Edward held a parliament at York. +He readily confirmed the ordinances, changed ministers, +even retired Despenser—anything for the military help +of his barons. But further operations against Scotland +were postponed till Hereford and the other prisoners +of note could be ransomed home. About a week later, +Edward had a communication from Bruce expressing a +strong desire for accord and amity. Safe conducts were +issued, and truce commissioners were appointed. Meantime, +however, the negotiations were too slow for the +Scots; for, on the very day that Edward appointed his +commissioners, the Prior and Convent of Durham signed +a bond for 800 marks to Randolph for a quiet life till +the middle of January. Randolph, in fact, penetrated +Yorkshire, committing the usual depredations. Still the +negotiations, which apparently had been entered into at +the instance of Philip of France, went forward. But in +November the English envoys returned from Dumfries +with empty hands, and with the news of the likelihood +of another invasion of the Scots, 'owing to the lack of +food in their country.' Already, indeed, a body of Scots +had occupied Tyndale, and were pushing down towards +Newcastle. About Christmas they again ravaged Northumberland, +and let off Cumberland till midsummer day +next year for the sum of 600 marks. The Archbishop of +York, whose manor of Hexham had suffered, vigorously denounced +the invaders; and at York Minster on January 17,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">110</a></span> +barons and clergy resolved on making a stand at Northallerton +three days later. But the only serious effort +of the season was Harcla's valorous November raid on +Dumfriesshire, where he was well punished, despite the +local knowledge of his recreant lieutenant, Sir Thomas +de Torthorwald. About the beginning of February, indeed, +John of Argyll overpowered the Scots in the Isle +of Man, and recovered it for Edward. But 'the terror +that prevailed throughout the north of England,' as Canon +Raine says, 'was something unexampled'; 'with the exception +of a few fortresses, two or three of the northern +counties were almost permanently occupied by the Scots.'</p> + +<p>On April 26, 1315, a Parliament was held in the Parish +Church of Ayr, to consider 'the condition, defence, and +perpetual security of the Kingdom of Scotland.' The +business was to settle the succession to the throne. It +was enacted that, failing lawful male heirs of King Robert, +Sir Edward and his lawful male heirs should succeed; +failing these, Marjory; and failing Marjory, the nearest +lineal heir of the body of Robert. In case the heir +were a minor, Randolph was to be guardian of both heir +and realm. Failing all these heirs, Randolph was to be +guardian until Parliament should determine the succession. +Presently Marjory married Sir Walter the Steward. She +died in her first confinement on March 2, 1315–16, leaving +a son, who became Robert II. of Scotland.</p> + +<p>The settlement no doubt was influenced by the imminence +of a large expansion of policy—the ill-starred +Irish expedition. On May 25, 1315, Sir Edward Bruce +landed at Carrickfergus with 6000 men. On his staff +were some of the foremost Scots knights—Randolph, Sir +Philip de Mowbray, Sir John de Soulis, Sir John the +Steward, and many others. The true motives of the enterprise +are by no means clear. There was no immediate +object in dividing the English forces, and in any case +there was involved a like division of the Scots forces. +The suggestion of the discontentment of the Scots with +their territorial boundaries, growing out of repeated successes +in the field and a superfluity of money, seems to +be a mere speculation of the Lanercost chronicler. There +is more probability in Barbour's assertion that Sir Edward<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">111</a></span> +Bruce, 'who stouter was than a leopard, thought Scotland +too small for his brother and himself.' It may be that +this particular outlet for his restless and ambitious spirit +was opened up by an offer of the crown of Ireland by +independent Ulster kinglets either in the first place to +King Robert or directly to Sir Edward himself. It is not +improbable, however, that the movement may have been +a serious attempt at a great flank attack on England. +Walsingham mentions 'a rumour that, if things went well +in Ireland, Sir Edward would at once pass over to Wales.' +'For these two races,' he says, 'are easily stirred to +rebellion, and, taking ill with the yoke of servitude, they +execrate the domination of the English.'</p> + +<p>The Irish expedition despatched from Ayr, King Robert +and his lieutenants again turned to the Border. In the +end of May, a meeting of the clergy and magnates of +the north had been convened at Doncaster by the Archbishop +of York, at the instance of the Earl of Lancaster +and other barons, who appear to have been in a conciliatory +mood; and on June 30, Edward issued his summons +for the muster at Newcastle by the middle of August. +But already, on June 29, Douglas had entered the episcopate +of Durham. Pushing on to Hartlepool, he occupied, +but did not burn the town, the people taking refuge on +the ships; and he returned laden with plunder. Sir +Ralph Fitz William had given Edward a week's warning, +but nothing had been done in consequence. It does +seem odd, therefore, to stumble on an account of payment +to nineteen smiths of Newcastle for 'pikois,' 'howes,' and +other instruments sent to Perth in August.</p> + +<p>On July 22, Bruce himself invested Carlisle, which was +held by the redoubtable Harcla. His army was amply +supplied by forays into Allerdale, Coupland, and Westmorland. +Every day an assault was delivered upon one +of the three gates of the city, and sometimes upon all at +once; but the besieged replied manfully with showers +of stones and arrows. On the fifth day of the siege, the +Scots brought into action a machine that hurled stones +continuously at the Caldew gate and the wall, but without +effect; and the defenders answered with seven or eight +similar machines, as well as with springalds for hurling<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">112</a></span> +darts and slings for hurling stones, 'which greatly frightened +and harassed the men without.' The Scots next +erected a wooden tower overtopping the wall; whereupon +the besieged raised over the nearest tower on the wall +a similar wooden tower overtopping the Scots one. But +the Scots tower proved useless, for its wheels stuck in +the mud of the moat, and it could not be got up to the +wall. Nor could the Scots use their long scaling ladders, +or a sow they had prepared to undermine the wall; they +could not fill up the moat with fascicles; and, when they +tried to run bridges of logs on wheels across the moat, +the weight of the mass, as in the case of the tower, sank +the whole construction in the mud. On the ninth day, +Bruce abandoned his engines, and delivered a general +assault; but still the besieged made manful defence. +Next day the attack was renewed with special vigour +on the eastern side, while Douglas with a determined +band attempted to scale the wall on the west, at its highest +and most difficult point, where an assault would not be +expected. His men mounted the wall under the protection +of a body of archers; but the English tumbled +down ladders and men, killing and wounding many, and +baffling the attack. On the morrow (August 1), the siege was +raised. The Lanercost chronicler, who writes as if he had +been present, affirms that only two Englishmen were killed +and a few wounded during the eleven days' investment.</p> + +<p>Whether Bruce was hopeless and disgusted, or had been +informed of the approach of a relieving force under Valence, +or had heard the false report of the defeat and death of Sir +Edward in Ireland, at any rate he hurried back to Scotland. +Harcla promptly sallied in pursuit, harassing flank and rear, +and making two important captures—Sir John de Moray +and Sir Robert Baird. Moray had been conspicuous at +Bannockburn, and had been enriched by the ransom of +twenty-three English knights, besides squires and others, +who had fallen to his share. Baird is described as 'a +man of the worst will towards Englishmen.' Harcla delivered +the prisoners to Edward, receiving (November 8) a +guerdon of 1000 marks; but the money was to be raised +from wardships, and the accrual of it was spread over eight +years. The King's treasury was low.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">113</a></span> +There is very little news of the Scots navy in those days, +but it seems to have been reasonably active. On September +12, one bold mariner, Thomas Dunn, 'with a great navy +of Scots,' followed an English ship into Holyhead harbour, +and, in the absence of the master on shore, carried it off +to Scotland. About the same time John of Argyll was +in Dublin, impatiently expecting reinforcements from the +Cinque Ports. Edward retained part of the squadron to +assist the French king against the Flemings.</p> + +<p>On January 15, 1315–16, Bruce and Douglas made a +sudden attack on Berwick, by land and sea simultaneously, +during the night. They hoped to effect an entrance from +the sea, at a point between the Brighouse and the castle, +where there was no wall. The attempt failed. It was +bright moonlight, and the assailants were promptly observed +and repulsed. Sir John de Landells was slain, and +Douglas himself escaped with difficulty in a small boat.</p> + +<p>The garrison of Berwick had only too much reason to +complain. Writing on October 3, Edward's Chamberlain +of Scotland had informed him that the provisions expected +from Boston in the end of July had never been sent, and +'the town is in great straits, and many are dying from +hunger.' Indeed, 'if the Mayor and himself had not +promised the garrison food and clothing for the winter, +they would have gone.' Two days later, Sir Maurice de +Berkeley, the warden, wrote that the town and the inhabitants +never were in such distress, 'and will be this +winter, if God and the King don't think more of them,' +and quickly. Unless money and provisions arrive by the +end of the month, they will give up their posts and leave +the town, to a man. On October 30, indeed, a vessel had +brought in malt, barley and beans, but the master had +had to throw overboard a great part of his cargo to escape +the enemy. On November 26, Edward sent £300 by way +of pay to the garrison; but he could not succour them +effectually, and apparently Valence, who was warden north +of Trent, had fallen into a lethargy. The repulse of Bruce +was therefore signally creditable to the defence.</p> + +<p>A series of four official despatches during the latter half +of February and the first week in March exhibit the deplorable +state of the town from famine. On February 14,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">114</a></span> +part of the garrison, in the teeth of the warden's orders, had +gone out on a foray, declaring it was better to die fighting +than to starve. They had captured many prisoners and +cattle, but Douglas, on the information of Sir Adam de +Gordon, who had recently changed sides, caught them at +Scaithmoor, slew their leader, and furiously broke up their +schiltron, killing or capturing twenty men-at-arms and sixty +foot. Considering that the men were struggling to keep +the means of rescuing them from starvation, Barbour may +well be right in declaring it to be the hardest fight that +Douglas ever fought. The foray brought no relief to the +garrison, except by diminution of mouths. The men were +'dying of hunger in rows on the walls.' 'Whenever a +horse dies,' wrote Sir Maurice de Berkeley, 'the men-at-arms +carry off the flesh and boil and eat it, not letting the +foot soldiers touch it till they have had what they will. +Pity to see Christians leading such a life.' He will remain +warden no longer than his term, which expires a month +after Easter.</p> + +<p>Meantime Sir Henry de Beaumont, warden of the +March, had gone to Lincoln to represent to the King +and Council his conferences with some of the Scots +leaders for a truce. On February 22, Edward appointed +commissioners to treat with Bruce, Sir Maurice de Berkeley +being one; and on April 28, 1316, he authorised safe +conducts for the Scots envoys. But the business did not +get forward, and the Mayor of Berwick, on May 10, sent +urgent news to the King. Berwick has provisions for a +month only; the enemy's cruisers have cut off supplies, and +have just captured two vessels with victuals; the warden +will serve an extended term till Whitsunday, but no longer; +Bruce will be at Melrose in a fortnight with all his force. +And all the time Edward was hampered in his measures +against Scotland by the war in Ireland and by a rising in +Wales.</p> + +<p>At midsummer 1316, the Scots again crossed the Border +with fire and sword, and penetrated to Richmond, where +they were heavily paid to abstain from further burning in +the town and neighbourhood. Then they headed west as +far as Furness, burning and ravaging without opposition. +They carried home immense booty, as well as many<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">115</a></span> +prisoners, men and women; and they were particularly +delighted with the quantity of iron they found at Furness, +there being very little iron in Scotland. The leader of this +expedition is not named.</p> + +<p>For many years there had been great scarcity in both +countries, a natural consequence of predatory warfare. +'This year,' says the Lanercost chronicler, 'there was +both in England and in Scotland a mortality of men from +famine and pestilence unheard of in our times; and in the +northern parts of England a quarter of corn sold at 40s.' +Walsingham says the distress was worst in the north, where, +he heard, 'the people ate dogs and horses and other unclean +animals.'</p> + +<p>In Ireland it was still worse; in these wretched years of +intestine broils, it is said 'men were wont to devour one +another.' Sir Edward Bruce had now been fighting there +for a full year. With his Irish allies, he had raided the +English adherents in Ulster; occupied Carrickfergus after +a great fight, but failed to take the castle; captured and +burnt Dundalk (June 29, 1315); defeated the joint forces +of the Earl of Ulster and the King of Connaught at Connor +(September 10); besieged Carrickfergus in vain (till December +6); marched down into Kildare, defeating first Sir Roger +de Mortimer at Kenlis, and afterwards (January 26) Sir +Edmund le Butler, the justiciar, at Arscott; and returned +to the siege of Carrickfergus, which was starved into surrender +some time in summer. On May 2, 1316, Sir Edward +was crowned King of Ireland.</p> + +<p>In autumn of 1315, and again in the following March, +Randolph had returned to Scotland for reinforcements. +On the latter occasion he brought Sir Edward's urgent +request that King Robert would come in person, for then +the conquest would be assured. In autumn, 1316, accordingly, +Bruce appointed Douglas and the Steward Guardians +in his absence, and sailed from Loch Ryan to Carrickfergus. +His operations during the winter in Ulster do not appear +to have advanced the cause materially, and in spring he +set out on an adventurous expedition throughout Ireland.</p> + +<p>Barbour's account, though considerably detailed, can be +treated only with the greatest reserve. King Edward led +the van, King Robert brought up the rear. The enemy<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">116</a></span> +lay in wait at Moyra Pass, 'the Gap of the North,' the +immemorial route of invaders north and south, some three +miles north of Dundalk. Edward, says Barbour, rode past +the ambush. When the rear came up, two archers appeared +in view, immediately suggesting the nearness of an enemy; +and Bruce held back his men. Sir Colin Campbell, son of +Sir Nigel and nephew of Bruce, pressed forward and killed +one of them, but the other shot his horse; whereupon +Bruce, in great wrath, felled Sir Colin with his truncheon +for disobedience, which 'might be cause of discomfiting.' +Emerging at length from the gorge, they found Richard de +Clare with 40,000 men drawn up on the plain, whom they +presently defeated: in all the Irish war 'so hard a fighting +was not seen.' When Edward heard of it, 'might no man +see a wrother man.' But only a cloistered ecclesiastic can +be held responsible for such military procedure.</p> + +<p>Advancing on Dublin, the Scots took Castle Knock on +February 23; two days later they were at Leixlip; in four +days more, they had reached Naas; and on March 12, they +were at Callan in Kilkenny. The southernmost place they +visited was Limerick, where they stayed two or three days. +As they were starting northwards again, King Robert heard +a woman's wail, and on inquiry learned that it was a poor +laundress that had been seized with the pains of labour and +was lamenting to be left behind; upon which he countermanded +the march till she should be able to accompany +the army. Such is Barbour's story; let us call it, after +Scott, a 'beautiful incident.' The expedition then, somehow, +passed back to Dublin, and on to Carrickfergus. It +is an amazing narrative. Possibly the Bruces anticipated +that they would gain over the tribes of the south and west; +possibly they expected to tap ampler and more convenient +sources of supplies; possibly they were trying the effect of +a grand demonstration. At any rate they did not win any +permanent support; 'in this march,' says Fordun, 'many +died of hunger, and the rest lived on horse-flesh'; and the +demonstration was utterly futile. Towards the end of the +march, the English hung upon the Scots, but 'hovered +still about them and did nothing.' Yet it seems unreasonable +to blame the English commanders, for it cannot be +doubted that they would have exterminated the Scots if<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">117</a></span> +they could. A change of Lord-Lieutenant was impending; +and Sir Roger de Mortimer of Wigmore, who had been +appointed to succeed Sir Edmund le Butler (November 23), +was delayed by want of outfit and did not arrive in Ireland +till April 7, when the expedition was practically over.</p> + +<p>King Robert returned to Scotland in May 1317, after an +absence of about half a year, bringing with him 'many +wounded men.' Meantime his lieutenants had kept Scotland +with a strong hand. During 1316, Edward's efforts to +conduct an army against the Scots had been again and +again thwarted, and towards the end of November negotiations +were in progress for a truce. At the same time the +redoubtable Harcla had been defeated and captured by +Sir John de Soulis (Barbour says) in Eskdale, and was +begging Edward for Sir John de Moray and Sir Robert +Baird, his former prisoners, 'in aid of his ransom, as he +does not see how he can free himself otherwise.' Truce or +no truce, the Earl of Arundel, who was in command on +the March, conceived the notion of sending a force to hew +down Jedburgh Forest. Douglas, who was building himself +a house at Lintalee on the Jed, took 50 men-at-arms and a +body of archers and planted an ambush at a wooded +pass. When the English—certainly nothing like 10,000, +as Barbour estimates them—had well entered, the archers +assailed them in flank, and Douglas struck upon the rear, +killing their leader, Sir Thomas de Richmond, and routing +them disastrously. A detachment that had taken possession +of Douglas's quarters at Lintalee he surprised at dinner and +slew almost to a man. Jedburgh Forest was left unfelled.</p> + +<p>About the same time, it came to the ears of Douglas that +Sir Robert de Neville, 'the Peacock of the North,' irritated +by the recurrent praise of his deeds, had boasted at Berwick +that he would fight him on the first chance. Douglas +instantly took the road to Berwick, marching in the night, +and in the early morning he displayed his broad banner, +and lit up the landscape by firing several villages. Neville +issued at the challenge and posted himself on a hill, expecting +that the Scots would scatter in search of plunder. +Douglas, however, impatiently advanced, and quickly met +Neville, man to man. It was an unequal contest. Neville +fell under the sword of Douglas. His troops fled. His<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">118</a></span> +three brothers, Alexander, John, and Ralph were among +the prisoners captured, and were held to ransom for 2000 +marks each.</p> + +<p>The English, beaten at all points on the Border, made +an attempt by sea, landing a force of 500 men near Inverkeithing +to raid Fife. The Earl and the Sheriff of Fife, +though apprised of their coming, had not the pluck or the +numbers to prevent their landing, and retired. Bishop +Sinclair of Dunkeld, however, rode up at the head of 60 +horsemen, his episcopal cloak covering a suit of full armour. +He scouted the Earl's excuse of superior numbers, and told +him to his face that he deserved to have his gilt spurs hewn +off his heels. 'Follow me,' he cried, 'and, in the name of +the Lord, and with the aid of St Columba, whose land they +are ravaging, we will take revenge.' Thereupon, casting off +his cloak and wielding a formidable spear, he spurred right +on the enemy, routed them, and drove them to their ships +with great slaughter. So precipitate was their flight that +one barge was overladen and sank with all on board. Ever +after Sinclair was called by King Robert 'my own Bishop,' +and popularly he was 'the Fechtin' Bishop.'</p> + +<p>Bruce had now complete control of every part of his +kingdom, excepting Berwick, and the northern counties +of England lay open to him at his will. It was more than +time for a final peace.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">119</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_XI" id="CHAPTER_XI">CHAPTER XI</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">CONCILIATION AMID CONFLICT</span></h2> + +<p>On January 1, 1316–17, the Pope declared a truce of two +years between Edward and Bruce 'acting as King of +Scotland' (<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">gerentem se pro rege Scotiæ</i>), and denounced +excommunication against all breakers thereof. By a Bull +dated March 17, he exhorted Edward to peace with Bruce +'now governing the realm of Scotland' (<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">impraesentiarum +regnum Scotiæ gubernantem</i>), representing not only the +waste of good lives and property but also the hindrance +to the recovery of the Holy Land, and announcing the +despatch of his nuncios, Guacelin d'Euse and Lucca di +Fieschi, to effect a solemn concord. Presently he drew up +two more Bulls, dated March 28—one, to certain English +prelates, excommunicating all enemies of Edward invading +England and Ireland; the other, to certain Irish prelates, +excommunicating Robert and Edward Bruce—but these +the Cardinals would hold in reserve till the issue of their +mission should declare itself. In these Bulls, King Robert +is 'late Earl of Carrick' (<i xml:lang="fr" lang="fr">dudum Comes de Carrik</i>); Edward, +by profession of eagerness to go on a crusade—and otherwise—is +the Pope's 'most dear son in Christ.' In view of +the crusade, it was essential that Edward should also enjoy +peace at home; and, on April 20, the Pope wrote to the +chief magnates urging them to support their King with +counsel and with help.</p> + +<p>Towards the end of June 1317, the two Cardinals +arrived in England, and were conducted with great +ceremony to London. Edward had gone to Woodstock, +where, on July 1, he summoned his parliament to meet at +Nottingham on the 18th, to consider, before the Cardinals +should come to his presence, the questions he would have +to discuss with them. On July 27, he authorised safe +conducts for the Cardinals' party, and assigned specially<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">120</a></span> +to the two prelates two officers of his personal staff. The +Cardinals started for the north, 'as the manner of the +Romans is,' with great pomp and circumstance. On the +way, they were to consecrate the new Bishop of Durham, +Louis de Beaumont, who proceeded in their train. They +were also accompanied by Sir Henry de Beaumont, the +brother of the Bishop elect, and other magnates. In the +pride of ecclesiastical security, they contemned all warnings +of danger. They had an unexpected welcome to the episcopate. +On September 1, as they were passing Rushyford, +within nine miles of Durham—if not at Aycliffe, three miles +south of Rushyford—they were suddenly assailed by Sir +Gilbert de Middleton and his robber band, and despoiled +of all their valuables. The prelates and their personal +attendants Sir Gilbert permitted to proceed to Durham, +perhaps on foot, unharmed; the Bishop elect, Sir Henry, +and the rest he consigned to Mitford Castle—the eyrie +whence he swooped upon the country around, harrying +as far as the Priory of Tynemouth. Arrived at Durham, the +Cardinals, having duly adored St Cuthbert and venerated +the venerable Bede, let loose upon their sacrilegious assailants +all the powers of excommunication. The malison, says +the Malmesbury chronicler, was efficacious; for, before the +year was out, Middleton was captured and taken to London, +where he was drawn, hanged, beheaded, and quartered.</p> + +<p>The Cardinals' advance messengers, and their special +envoys (<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">praecursores</i>)—the Bishop of Corbau and the +Archdeacon of Perpignan—had reached the Border in +safety. There the messengers had been stopped. The +envoys, however, were met, about the beginning of September, +by Douglas and Sir Alexander de Seton, and +allowed to proceed, but only after handing over their +letters for King Robert. They were conducted to Roxburgh +Castle. There the King received them graciously, +listened with reverent attention to the Pope's open letters +in favour of peace, and replied that he would welcome a +good and lasting peace, whether arranged by the mediation +of the Cardinals or otherwise. He also listened respectfully +to the Cardinals' open letters. But as for the +<em>close</em> letters, he positively refused to break the seal of one of +them. They were addressed to Robert de Brus, 'governing<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">121</a></span> +the realm of Scotland.' 'There are several others of +the name of Robert de Brus,' he said, 'who take part +with the other barons in the government of the realm of +Scotland. These letters may be for one of them; they +are not addressed to me, for they do not bear the title +of King.' No; he would not risk opening other men's +letters. Still, he would assemble his Council and consult +with them whether he should nevertheless receive +the Cardinals to audience; but, as his barons were engaged +in various distant places, it would be impossible +for him to give his decision till Michaelmas (September 29).</p> + +<p>The envoys had their apology ready. They explained +that it was the custom of Holy Mother Church, during +the pendency of a question, not to say or write anything +calculated to prejudice either party. 'If my Father and +my Mother,' replied Bruce, holding up the Pope's letters, +'wished to avoid creating prejudice against the other party +by calling me King, it seems to me that they ought not, +while the question is still pending, create prejudice against +me by withholding the title from me; especially when I am +in possession of the realm, and everybody in it calls me +King, and foreign kings and princes address me as King. +Really, it appears to me that my Father and Mother are +partial as between their sons. If you had presented a letter +with such an address to another king, it may be that you +would have received another sort of answer.' This caustic +reply, the envoys reported, he delivered with a benign mien, +'always showing due reverence for his Father and Mother.'</p> + +<p>The envoys passed to the next point. They requested +him to cease meantime from further hostilities. 'That,' +he replied, 'I can in no wise do without the consent of +my barons; besides, the English are making reprisals upon +my people and their property.'</p> + +<p>In the confidence of authority, the envoys had taken +with them one of the Cardinals' advance messengers, who +had been sent on with a letter announcing the Pope's +coronation, but had been stopped at the frontier. They +now entreated King Robert to grant him a safe conduct; +but he denied their request 'with a certain change of +countenance,' not uttering a word.</p> + +<p>Turning to Bruce's staff they inquired anxiously, Why<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">122</a></span> +was this? Why, simply because King Robert was not +suitably addressed. But for this blunder, he would have +willingly and promptly responded on every point.</p> + +<p>So wrote the Cardinals to the Pope from Durham on +September 7. They added that they expected nothing +better than a refusal of an audience at Michaelmas; for, +even if Robert were himself disposed to receive them, it +was evident that his barons would offer opposition. The +friends of Bruce had made no secret of their opinion that the +reservation of the royal title was a deliberate slight at the +instance of English intriguers—an opinion avowedly based +on information from the papal court. The contrary assurances +of the envoys had been worse than useless, and they +despaired of further intercommunication unless and until +the resentment of the Scots should be mollified by concession +of the royal title. Some considerable time after +Michaelmas, Bruce confirmed by letter the anticipations +of the Cardinals. He must have his royal title recognised. +At the same time he repeated his desire for peace, and +his readiness to send representatives to negotiate; but +when the bearer brought back the Cardinals' reply, he +was stopped at the frontier, and had to take the letters +back—no doubt because they were still improperly +addressed.</p> + +<p>Three days later (September 10), Edward wrote to the +Pope from York, whither he had hastened on hearing +of the assault on the Cardinals, assuring him that he +would promptly 'avenge God and the Church,' and see +that the prelates had their temporal losses made good.</p> + +<p>To do the Pope justice, he had been anxious to keep +clear of the difficulties obviously involved in the reservation +of Bruce's royal title. In his letter of March 18, he had +apologetically prayed Bruce not to take it ill that he was +not styled King of Scotland. On October 21, he sends +the Cardinals letters—one for Bruce explaining the former +omission of the royal title, and apparently conceding it +now; another for Edward, begging him not to be offended +at his styling Bruce King; and a third for themselves, +blaming them for not telling him whether or not they +had Edward's consent that he (the Pope) should address +Bruce as King. They are to request Edward to give way<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">123</a></span> +on the point; and they are to present or to keep back +the letters as they may see expedient. The information +of the Scots from Avignon was evidently well grounded.</p> + +<p>Meantime the Cardinals made another attempt. They +proclaimed the truce in London, and had it proclaimed +by other ecclesiastics 'in other principal places of England +and Scotland.' But they must bring it directly to the knowledge +of Bruce. Accordingly they despatched Adam de +Newton, the Guardian of the monastery of the Friars +Minors in Berwick, to King Robert and the leading prelates +of Scotland, to make the proclamation. Adam prudently +left his papers in safe keeping at Berwick till he had +provided himself with a safe conduct. On December 14, he +set out for Old Cambus, twelve miles off, and found Bruce +in a neighbouring wood hard at work, 'day and night, without +rest,' preparing engines for the siege of Berwick. He +at once obtained his safe conduct, and fetched his Bulls +and other letters from Berwick to Old Cambus; but Sir +Alexander de Seton refused to allow him to wait upon the +King, and required him to hand over the letters. Seton +took the letters to Bruce, or professed to do so, but presently +brought them back, delivered them to Adam, and +ordered him to be gone. Bruce would have nothing to do +with Bulls and processes that withheld from him the title of +King, and he was in any case determined, he said, to have +the town of Berwick. Adam, however, was not to be +baffled. He proclaimed the truce publicly before Seton +'and a great assembly of people.' The Scots, however, +would not take it seriously. Not the most solemn adjurations +could procure for Adam a safe conduct either back to +Berwick or on to the Scots prelates, and he was summarily +ordered to get out of the country with all speed. +So he took his way to Berwick. But he was waylaid and +stripped to the skin, and his Bulls and processes were torn +in pieces. Still Adam was undaunted. 'I tell you, before +God,' he wrote to the Cardinals on December 20, 'that I am +still ready as ever, without intermission, to labour for the +advancement of your affairs.'</p> + +<p>From midsummer 1317, Edward's officers had been +kept busy on the March. About the beginning of July, +Sir John de Athy had taken the Scots sea-captain, Thomas<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">124</a></span> +Dunn, and killed all his men, except himself and his +cousin, from whom Sir John had learned that Randolph +was preparing to attack the Isle of Man, and even had +designs on Anglesey, where English traitors were in league +with him. Before January there had been large submissions +to Bruce in the northern counties, partly from +compulsion of arms, partly from starvation; and the +chronic feuds between the town and the castle of Berwick +were dangerously aggravated by the high-handedness of the +constable, Sir Roger de Horsley, who hated all Scots +impartially and intensely.</p> + +<p>At last a burgess of Berwick, Peter (or Simon) de +Spalding, exasperated by Horsley's supercilious harshness—bribed +with ready money and promise of lands, the Lanercost +chronicler says; corrupted by Douglas, says John of +Tynmouth—entered into communication with the Marshal +(or the Earl of March) for the betrayal of the town. By +direction of the King, the Marshal (or March) ambushed at +night in Duns Park, where he was joined by Randolph and +Douglas. Advancing on foot, the Scots planted their +ladders unperceived and scaled the wall at the point +where Simon was in charge. The temptation to plunder +upset the order of attack, two-thirds of the party scattering +themselves over the town, breaking houses and slaying +men. The opposition of the town's people was easily +overcome, but when the garrison sallied, Randolph and +Douglas were dangerously weak. Sir William de Keith, +however, exerted himself conspicuously, as became a +brand-new knight, in collecting the Scots, and after very +hard fighting the garrison was driven in. Bruce presently +came up with large reinforcements, but the castle held out +tenaciously, and surrendered only to famine. The town +was taken on March 28 (Fordun), or April 2 (Lanercost); +the castle held out gallantly till past the middle of July, +and even then Horsley marched out his famished garrison +with the honours of war. Bruce installed as warden +Sir Walter the Steward. Peter of Spalding, says John +of Tynmouth, proved troublesome in insisting upon his +promised reward; and, on an accusation of plotting against +the life of King Robert, was put to death. The allegation +recalls the case of Sir Peter de Lubaud.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">125</a></span> +Edward was extremely incensed at the Mayor and burgesses +of Berwick, who had undertaken, for 6000 marks, +to defend the town for a year from June 15, 1317. He +ascribed the loss of it to their carelessness, and in the +middle of April he ordered that their goods and chattels, +wheresoever found, should be confiscated, and that such +of them as had escaped into England should be imprisoned. +On June 10, 1318, he summoned his army to meet him at +York on July 26, to proceed against the Scots.</p> + +<p>Meantime the Scots were proceeding with vigour against +him. For soon after the capture of Berwick town, Bruce +detached a strong force to ravage the northern counties. +They laid waste Northumberland to the gates of Newcastle, +starved the castles of Harbottle and Wark into surrender, +and took Mitford Castle by stratagem. They sold immunity +to the episcopate of Durham, excepting Hartlepool, +which Bruce threatened to burn and destroy because some +of its inhabitants had captured a ship freighted with his +'armeours' and provisions. Northallerton, Ripon, Boroughbridge, +Knaresborough, Otley and Skipton were guiding-points +in the desolating track of the invaders. Ripon and +Otley suffered most severely, and Ripon paid 1000 marks +for a cessation of destruction. Fountains Abbey also paid +ransom; Bolton Abbey was plundered; Knaresborough +Parish Church bears to this day the marks of the fire that +burnt out the fugitives. The expedition returned to Scotland +laden with spoils, and bringing numerous captives and +great droves of cattle. The Archbishop of York postponed +misfortune by being too late with measures of resistance. +But he energetically excommunicated the depredators, all +and sundry.</p> + +<p>On hearing of Bruce's reception of the envoys, the Pope +had authorised the Cardinals, on December 29, to put in +execution the two Bulls of excommunication prepared in +the previous March. The Cardinals, however, would seem +to have delayed. On June 28, 1318, when the Pope +heard of the woeful adventures of Adam de Newton and +of the capture of Berwick despite his truce, he ordered +them to proceed. For Bruce, he said, had 'grievously' +(<i xml:lang="la" lang="la">dampnabiliter</i>) 'abused his patience and long-suffering.' +In September accordingly they excommunicated and laid<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">126</a></span> +under interdict Bruce himself, his brother Edward, and all +their aiders and abettors in the invasion of England and +Ireland. 'But,' says the Lanercost chronicler, 'the Scots +cared not a jot for any excommunication, and declined to +pay any observance to the interdict.' In October, Edward +followed up his diplomatic success by pressing hard for +the deposition of the Bishop of St Andrews, but the +Pope easily found good technical pleas whereby to avoid +compliance.</p> + +<p>The Irish expedition came to a disastrous close on the +fatal field of Faughart, near Dundalk, on October 5 (or +14), 1318. A vastly superior English army, under Sir +John de Bermingham, moved against the Scots; and King +Edward the Bruce, wrathfully overruling the counsels of +his staff, disdaining to wait for the approaching reinforcements +from Scotland, and despising the hesitations of his +Irish allies, dashed against the tremendous odds with his +native impetuosity.</p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="iq">'Now help quha will, for sekirly<br /></span> +<span class="i0">This day, but mair baid, fecht vill I.<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Sall na man say, quhill I may dre,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">That strynth of men sall ger me fle!<br /></span> +<span class="i0">God scheld that ony suld vs blame<br /></span> +<span class="i0">That we defoull our nobill name!'<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p>Barbour gives the numbers at 2000 against 40,000, no +doubt with generous exaggeration. King Edward fell at +the first onset, killed by a gigantic Anglo-Irish knight, Sir +John de Maupas, who was found lying dead across his +body. Sir John the Steward, Sir John de Soulis, and +other officers were slain. Barbour tells how Sir Philip +de Mowbray, stunned in action, was led captive by two +men towards Dundalk; how he recovered his senses +sufficiently to realise his position, shook off his captors, +drew his sword and turned back towards the battle-field, +and how he cleared a hundred men out of his way as +he went. John Thomasson, the leader of the Carrick +men, took him in charge, and hurried him away towards +Carrickfergus. But the brave defender of Stirling had +received a mortal wound. King Edward's body was +dismembered, the trunk buried at Faughart, and the +limbs exposed in Irish towns held by the English. The<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">127</a></span> +head is said to have been sent to England to Edward; +but Barbour tells how King Edward the Bruce had that +day exchanged armour with Gilbert the Harper, as he +had done before at Connor, and how it was Gilbert's +head that had been mistakenly struck off and despatched +to England. The remnants of the Scots army reached +Carrickfergus with the utmost difficulty, and hastily took +ship for Scotland, where the news was received with great +lamentation. Bermingham was created Earl of Louth for +his victory. It is curious to observe that his wife was a +sister of the Queen of Scotland.</p> + +<p>The death of Edward Bruce disturbed the settlement of +the succession, which was again brought under consideration +of Parliament, on December 3, at Scone. Robert, +the son of Sir Walter the Steward and the late Princess +Marjory, was recognised as heir, with a proviso saving +the right of any subsequent male issue of King Robert. +In case of a minority, Randolph was to be guardian; and +failing Randolph, Douglas.</p> + +<p>No sooner had the sentences of excommunication been +promulgated than King Robert took measures to have +them revoked or mitigated. He had good friends at +Rome. Letters from these had fallen accidentally into +the hands of Edward, who, on January 12, 1318–19, sent +them to the Pope by the hands of Sir John de Neville, +and asked His Holiness to deal suitably with the writers. +A few days before, he had urged the two Cardinals to +press the Pope to reject the applications that he heard +were being made on behalf of Bruce and his friends, and +stated that he would presently send envoys to the Pope +himself. Neville was graciously received, and the Pope +ordered the Scots and their abettors at his court to prison. +On April 24, the Pope granted Edward's request for a +Bull permitting him to negotiate for peace with the Scots +notwithstanding their excommunication. But the pressure +was not all on one side; the nuncios in England boldly +exercised their powers, and had often to be restrained +even by royal menace, while every ecclesiastical office was +steadily claimed for the papal nominee. Bruce appears +to have deemed it prudent to raise little formal objection +to the papal appointment of ecclesiastics up and down<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">128</a></span> +Scotland, though some of them evidently had but a seat +of thorns.</p> + +<p>From March to May there was an interesting correspondence +between Edward and some minor states and +municipalities on the other side of the North Sea, whose +people, Edward understood, had harboured, or even +assisted, his Scots enemies. They all denied the allegation. +The statesmanlike answer of the Count of Flanders, +however, is peculiarly notable. 'Our land of Flanders,' +he wrote, 'is common to all men, of whatever country, +and freely open to all comers; and we cannot deny +admission to merchants doing their business as they +have hitherto been accustomed, for thereby we should +bring our land to desolation and ruin.'</p> + +<p>But Berwick must be recaptured. On the loss of +Berwick town, Edward had angrily summoned his forces +to muster at York on July 26, 1318. So few of them +appeared, however, that he was forced to postpone the +expedition. On June 4, 1319, he ordered the Welsh +levies to be at Newcastle by July 24 at latest; and, two +days after, he wrote to the Pope that he hoped now 'to +put a bit in the jaws of the Scots.' But another postponement +was forced on him. On July 20, however, he +issued a peremptory order for a muster at Michaelmas. +His May parliament at York had granted him certain taxes, +his treasury being 'exhausted more than is believed'; and +his good friend the Pope had added a material contribution. +But the levy could not be collected till Michaelmas, +and meantime the King appealed for an advance. There +must have been a favourable response, for early in September +he encamped before Berwick with some 10,000 or 12,000 +men, his fleet occupying the harbour. Having entrenched +his lines, he delivered a general assault on September 7. +The besiegers hastily filled the dykes and placed their +scaling-ladders, but the garrison threw them down as +fast as they were raised. The lowness of the wall was +not altogether in favour of the assailants, for the besieged +on the top could easily thrust their spears in their faces. +In the course of the afternoon the English brought a ship +on the flood-tide up to the wall, with a boat lashed to midmast, +whence a bridge was to be let down for landing a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">129</a></span> +storming party. They were embarrassed in their efforts, +however, and the ship, being left aground by the ebb-tide, +was burned by the Scots, the sallying party with difficulty +regaining the town. The fight went on briskly till night, +when the combatants agreed to postpone its renewal for +five days.</p> + +<p>Though King Robert had mustered a considerable +force, probably as large as Edward's, he deemed it more +prudent to despatch it on a raid into England than to +launch it directly against the English entrenchments. He +had, indeed, good reason to rely upon the skill and energy +of the Steward. The five days' truce over, the English, +on September 13, moved forward on wheels an immense +sow, not only covering a mining party, but carrying +scaffolds for throwing a storming party on the wall. By +this time, John Crab, whom we have already met as a +sea-captain or pirate, and whom the Count of Flanders +presently assured Edward he would break on the wheel, +if he could only get hold of him, had proved himself +engineer enough to devise a 'crane,' which must have +been of the nature of a catapult; and this engine he ran +along the wall on wheels to encounter the sow. The +first shot passed over the monster; the second just fell +short; the third crashed through the main beam, and +frightened the men out. 'Your sow has farrowed,' cried +the Scots. Crab now lowered blazing faggots of combustible +stuff upon the sow, and burnt it up. But presently +another attempt was made from the harbour, and +Crab's engine was hurried up to fight ships with top-castles +full of men, and with fall-bridges ready at midmast. +The first shot demolished the top gear of one +of the ships, bringing down the men; and the other ships +kept a safe distance.</p> + +<p>Meantime the general attack raged all along the wall. +Sir Walter the Steward rode from point to point, supplying +here and there men from his own bodyguard, till it +was reduced from a hundred to a single man-at-arms. +The severest pressure was at Mary Gate. The besiegers +forced the advance barricade, burned the drawbridge, +and fired the gate. Sir Walter drew reinforcements from +the castle, which had not been attacked, threw open Mary<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">130</a></span> +Gate and sallied upon the foe, driving them back after a +very hard struggle, and saving the gate. Night separated +the combatants. Barbour tells how the women and +children of the town had carried arrows to the men +on the walls, and regards it as a miracle that not one +of them was slain or wounded. But clearly the Steward +could not sustain many days of such heavy fighting.</p> + +<p>The Scots army under Randolph and Douglas had +meanwhile followed the familiar track through Ripon +and Boroughbridge, harrying and burning and slaying. +They appear to have made a serious attempt to capture +Edward's Queen, who was then staying near York; but +the Archbishop, learning this intention from a Scots spy +that had been taken prisoner, sallied forth and brought +her into the city, and sent her by water to Nottingham. +Trokelowe speaks of certain 'false Englishmen' that had +been bribed by the Scots, and Robert of Reading specifies +Sir Edmund Darel as the guide of the invaders in the +attempt. Next day the Archbishop, with Bishop Hotham +of Ely, the Chancellor of England, and an unwieldy +multitude of clergy and townspeople numbering some +10,000, advanced against the Scots between Myton and +Thornton-on-Swale, about twelve miles north of York. +'These,' said the Scots, 'are not soldiers, but hunters; +they will not do much good.' For the English 'came +through the fields in scattered fashion, and not in united +order.' The Scots formed a schiltron, and set fire to some +hay in front, the smoke from which was blown into the +faces of the English. As they met, the Scots raised a great +shout, and the enemy, 'more intent on fleeing than on fighting,' +took to their heels. The Scots mounted in pursuit, +killing (says the Lanercost chronicle) clergy and laymen, +about 4000, including Nicholas Fleming, the Mayor of +York, while about 1000, 'as was said,' were drowned in the +Swale. Many were captured and held to heavy ransom. +The Archbishop lost, not only his men, his carriages, and +his equipment generally, but all his plate, 'silver and bronze +as well,' which his servants had 'thoughtlessly' taken to +the field; and yet the blame may rest elsewhere, for +the York host appears to have fully anticipated that the +Scots would flee at sight of them. The Primate's official<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">131</a></span> +cross was saved by the bearer, who dashed on horseback +through the Swale and carefully hid it, escaping himself in +the dusk of the evening. Then a countryman, who had +observed the cross and watched the bearer's retreat, discovered +it, wound wisps of hay about it, and kept it in his +hut till search was made for it, whereupon he restored it +to the Archbishop. Such is John of Bridlington's story. +The whole episode contrasts markedly with the exploit of +Bishop Sinclair in Fife. It was contemptuously designated, +from the number of ecclesiastics, 'the Chapter of Myton.'</p> + +<p>The Myton disaster occurred on September 20, and on +September 24 Edward raised the siege of Berwick. Certain +chroniclers speak of intestine dissensions, and particularly +of a quarrel with Lancaster over the appointment of wardens +of town and castle once Berwick was taken. The Lanercost +chronicler says Edward desired to detach a body to +intercept the Scots, and with the rest to carry on the siege; +but his magnates would not hear of it. He accordingly +abandoned the siege, and marched westward to cut off the +retreat of the Scots. Randolph had penetrated to Castleford +Bridge, near Pontefract, and swept up Airedale and +Wharfdale; and, passing by Stainmoor and Gilsland, he +eluded Edward's army, and carried into Scotland many +captives and immense plunder. It remained for Edward +but to disband his troops, and go home, as usual, with +empty hands.</p> + +<p>About a month later (November 1), when the crops were +harvested in northern England, Randolph and Douglas +returned with fire and sword. They burnt Gilsland, and +passed down to Brough (Burgh) under Stainmoor; turned +back on Westmorland, which they ravaged for ten or twelve +days, and went home through Cumberland. They mercilessly +burnt barns and the stored crops, and swept the +country of men and cattle.</p> + +<p>Edward began to think of truce. In his letter of December +4 to the Pope, he represents that urgent proposals +for peace had come to him from Bruce and his friends. In +any case, the step was a most sensible one. On December +21, terms were agreed on, and next day Bruce confirmed +them. This truce was to run for two years and the odd +days to Christmas. Bruce agreed to raise no new fortresses<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">132</a></span> +within the counties of Berwick, Roxburgh, and Dumfries. +He delivered the castle of Harbottle to Edward's commissioners, +'as private persons,' with the proviso that, unless +a final peace were made by Michaelmas, it should be either +redelivered to him or demolished. On August 25, 1321, +Edward commanded that it should be destroyed 'as secretly +as possible.'</p> + +<p>In autumn 1319, the Pope, at the instance of Edward, +had given orders for a revival of the excommunications +against Bruce and his friends; but on January 8, 1319–20, +he cited Bruce and the Bishops of St Andrews, Dunkeld, +Aberdeen, and Moray, to compear before him by May 1. +The summons went unheeded; he had not addressed +Bruce as King. Excommunications were again hurled at +Bruce and his bishops, and Scotland was laid under +ecclesiastical interdict. Meanwhile, however, the Scots +'barons, freeholders, and all the community of the realm'—no +churchmen, be it observed—assembled at Arbroath +Abbey on April 6, and addressed to his Holiness a memorable +word in season. First, as to their kingdom and their +King:</p> + +<blockquote> + +<p>Our nation continued to enjoy freedom and peace under the protection +of the Papal See, till Edward, the late King of the English, in +the guise of a friend and ally, attacked our realm, then without a head, +and our people, then thinking no evil or deceit, and unaccustomed to +war or aggression. The acts of injury, murder, violence, burning, +imprisonment of prelates, burning of abbeys, spoliation and slaying of +ecclesiastics, and other enormities besides, which he practised on our +people, sparing no age or sex, creed or rank, no man could describe +or fully understand without the teaching of experience. From such +countless evils, by the help of Him that woundeth and maketh whole, +we have been delivered by the strenuous exertions of our Sovereign +Lord, King Robert, who, for the deliverance of his people and his +inheritance from the hands of the enemy, like another Maccabeus or +Joshua, cheerfully endured toils and perils, distress and want. Him +the Divine Providence, that legal succession in accordance with our +laws and customs, which we are resolved to uphold even to death, and +the due consent of us all, made our Prince and King. To him, as the +man that has worked out the salvation of the people, we, in maintenance +of our freedom, by reason as well of his merits as of his right, +hold and are resolved to adhere in all things. If he should abandon +our cause, with the intention of subjecting us or our realm to the King +of England or to the English, we should instantly strain every nerve +to expel him as our enemy and the subverter of both his own rights +and ours, and choose another for our King, such a one as should<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">133</a></span> +suffice for our defence; for, so long as a hundred of us remain alive, +never will we be reduced to any sort of subjection to the dominion of +the English. For it is not for glory, or riches, or honours, that we +contend, but for freedom alone, which no man worthy of the name +loses but with his life.</p></blockquote> + +<p>With this noble and resolute declaration, they appealed to +the Pope to 'admonish' Edward, who ought to be content +with his own dominions, anciently held enough for seven +kings, and 'to leave in peace us Scotsmen, dwelling in our +poor and remote country, and desiring nothing but our +own,' for which 'we are ready and willing to do anything +we can consistently with our national interests.' But, +further, as to the Pope himself:</p> + +<blockquote> + +<p>If, however, your Holiness, yielding too credulous an ear to the +reports of our English enemies, do not give sincere credit to what we +now say, or do not cease from showing them favour to our confusion, +it is on you, we believe, that in the sight of the Most High, must be +charged the loss of lives, the perdition of souls, and all the other +miseries that they will inflict on us and we on them.</p></blockquote> + +<p>This memorable declaration was not without effect. On +August 13, the Pope earnestly impressed Edward with the +duty of keeping on good terms with Bruce. And on +August 18, he wrote that, on the prayer of Bruce by his +envoys, Sir Edward de Mambuisson and Sir Adam de +Gordon, he had granted suspension of the personal citation +and of the publication of the sentences till the 1st of April +next year.</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">134</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_XII" id="CHAPTER_XII">CHAPTER XII</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">PEACE AT THE SWORD'S POINT</span></h2> + +<p>The Scots manifesto of April 6, 1320, presented a united +and firm front to English pretensions and Papal intrigues. +Yet there were traitors in the camp. Little more than four +months had elapsed when the Black Parliament, held at +Scone on August 20, was investigating a conspiracy to kill +King Robert and elevate to the throne Sir William de +Soulis. Sir William was a brother of Sir John, and a +grandson of Sir Nicholas, one of the Competitors in 1292. +Edward's emissaries had been tampering with the fidelity +of King Robert's barons.</p> + +<p>The plot still remains involved in obscurity. It was +discovered to the King, Barbour heard, by a lady. Gray, +however, as well as John of Tynmouth, states that the +informant was Sir Murdoch de Menteith, who had come +over to Bruce in 1316–17, and remained on the Scots side +till his death some sixteen years later; but, apart from his +name, there seems no reason to suppose that he was in +Edward's pay. Sir William was arrested at Berwick, with +360 squires in his livery (says Barbour), to say nothing of +'joly' knights. He openly confessed his guilt, and was +interned for life in Dumbarton Castle. The Countess of +Strathearn was also imprisoned for life. Sir David de +Brechin, Sir John de Logie, and Richard Brown a squire, +were drawn, hanged, and beheaded. Sir Roger de Mowbray +opportunely died; but his body was brought up and +condemned to be drawn, hanged, and beheaded—a ghastly +sentence considerately remitted by the King. Sir Eustace +de Maxwell, Sir Walter de Barclay, Sheriff of Aberdeen, +Sir Patrick de Graham, and two squires, Hamelin de +Troupe and Eustace de Rattray, were fully acquitted. +Soulis, Brechin, Mowbray, Maxwell, and Graham had all<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">135</a></span> +attended the Arbroath parliament, and put their seals to +the loyal manifesto.</p> + +<p>It is far from evident why Soulis escaped with imprisonment +while Brechin and others were sent to the gallows. +Robert may have judged that Soulis was a tool rather than +prime mover of the plot; he may have regarded the long +service of the culprit; he may have softened at the recollection +of his brother Sir John's death by his own brother +Edward's side. Brechin, no doubt, had considerable services +to his credit. But his record shows grievous instability, +and Robert probably had sound reasons for putting +a period to his dubieties. His fate aroused painful regrets. +Barbour narrates that Sir Ingram de Umfraville openly +censured the sight-seers at his friend's execution, obtained +leave to give the body honourable burial, and prepared to +quit Scotland, telling the King he had no heart to remain +after seeing so good a knight meet with such a fate. This +story of Barbour's has been too hastily discredited.</p> + +<p>The position of Bruce remained unshaken. On November +17, Edward instructed various high officers to receive +to his peace, 'as secretly as they could,' such Scots as felt +their consciences troubled by the papal excommunication; +and, on December 11, the Archbishop of York was empowered +to release all such renegades from the censure of +the Church. Sir Ingram de Umfraville was re-established +in his Northumberland estates (January 26), and Sir Alexander +de Mowbray (February 18) and Sir William de +Mohaut (May 20) obtained Edward's pardon. But Bruce +was practically unaffected by Edward's subterranean diplomacy.</p> + +<p>Openly, Edward maintained due observance of the +truce, and by the middle of September 1320, had taken +steps towards a final peace. The negotiations begun at +Carlisle at Michaelmas were resumed at Newcastle on +February 2, and continued for nine weeks; papal commissioners +being present, and French envoys fostering the +cause of peace. But the deliberations were fruitless. The +Earl of Richmond's production of a mass of old parchments +to demonstrate Edward's overlordship of Scotland +indicates how little the English King and commissioners +realised the facts of the situation.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">136</a></span> +Throughout the summer and autumn of 1321, Edward +was in hot water with the barons of the Welsh border. At +the July parliament at Westminster, he was compelled to +banish the Despensers, and to send home the turbulent +lords with pardon. These troubles prevented him from +sending the promised envoys to 'enlighten the consciences' +of the Pope and his Cardinals as to the wickedness of the +Scots. On August 25, however, he wrote the usual +denunciatory generalities, and yet again impressed on his +Holiness the necessity of dealing severely with Bruce and +his adherents. The summons of Bruce and his four +Bishops had meanwhile been postponed to September 1; +but even then they did not compear. Edward's envoys, +at last despatched on December 8, were still in very good +time. Having taken Leeds Castle in Kent and driven +back the marauding Marchers to the Welsh border, he +informed the Pope that his domestic troubles were settling +down, and, in view of an expedition on the expiry of the +Scots truce at Christmas, he appealed for a subsidy from +Rome. But already Lancaster was stretching one hand to +Bruce and the other to the malcontents of the Welsh +March.</p> + +<p>The Marchers rose, but Edward proved himself the +stronger, and by the third week of January received the +submission of the Mortimers. On February 8, he tried +conciliation with Lancaster, and also authorised Harcla to +treat with Bruce for 'some sort of final peace.' Lancaster, +however, received the Welsh insurgents, and harassed +Edward's advance, but was compelled to fall back on his +castle of Pontefract.</p> + +<p>Lancaster's negotiations with the Scots had begun as +early as December. His emissary, Richard de Topcliffe, +an ecclesiastic, had obtained a safe-conduct from Douglas +(December 11) to visit Jedburgh, and one from Randolph +(January 15) to come to him wherever he could find him. +Randolph was then at Corbridge on a swift raid, while +Douglas and the Steward advanced, the one towards Hartlepool +and the other towards Richmond, harrying or taking +ransom. Immediately on the junction of Hereford and his +Marchers with Lancaster at Pontefract, in the beginning +of February, before they went south to oppose Edward's<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">137</a></span> +advance, the rebel chiefs despatched John de Denum with +a letter to Bruce, Randolph, and Douglas, 'or which of +them he shall soonest find,' asking an appointment for a +final agreement. The precise terms proposed were presently +found on the dead body of Hereford at Boroughbridge. +Bruce, if not detained by illness or other serious cause, +and Randolph and Douglas, with their power, shall join +the Earls in their enterprise 'in England, Wales and +Ireland, and with them live and die in the maintenance +of their quarrel, without claiming conquest or dominion +in the said lands of England, Wales, and Ireland.' The +Earls, on their part, shall never aid Edward against the +Scots, and, their quarrel ended, shall do their best to +establish and maintain peace between the two countries +on the footing of independence. Fortunately for Edward, +John de Denum lost ten days in his peregrinations. He +missed Douglas on February 7, and was unable to obtain +his reply till February 17. On February 16, Randolph, +then at Cavers, near Hawick, had issued a safe-conduct +for Sir John de Mowbray and Sir Roger de Clifford to +come to him in Scotland. In either case, the ten days +were gone. But for this accident, the history of the +English crown would probably have been turned into another +channel.</p> + +<p>The approach of the royal troops decided the insurgents +to retire towards the Scots, to Lancaster's castle of Dunstanburgh. +At Boroughbridge, however, they were confronted +by Harcla on March 16, and disastrously defeated. +Hereford was slain on the bridge; Lancaster was captured, +tried, and beheaded. Harcla was created Earl of Carlisle. +'Do not trouble yourself,' wrote Edward to the Pope +(March 25), 'to proclaim a truce between me and the Scots. +Formerly some exigencies inclined me to a truce, but now, +thank God, these no longer exist, and I am constrained, by +God's help, to war them down for their broken faith.'</p> + +<p>Edward at once summoned his army to muster at Newcastle +by the second week in June; but early in May he +postponed the assembly till July 24. By that time, however, +the Scots had completed another destructive raid. Before +mid June, a force had crossed the western March; and in +the beginning of July, Robert himself, with Randolph and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">138</a></span> +Douglas, penetrated beyond Preston and ravaged the +length and breadth of Lancashire and the archdeaconry +of Richmond, burning Lancaster town and castle 'so entirely +that nothing is left,' and carrying off what cattle had +not been driven for safety into the remoter parts of Yorkshire. +They do not seem to have encountered local opposition. +As they returned, they lay five days before Carlisle, +without drawing forth the prudent Harcla; and on July 24, +they struck their tents for home.</p> + +<p>The English army followed them, entering Scotland by +the eastern March in the first days of August. Robert +withdrew both men and cattle from the Merse and the +Lothians, either to the strongholds or beyond the Forth, +and lay with his army at Culross. Barbour tells how an +English foraging party found but one lame cow at Tranent: +'It is the dearest beef I ever saw yet,' remarked Warenne, +'it must have cost £1000 and more.' Edward himself +subsequently wrote that he had 'found neither man nor +beast' in the Lothians. The English fleet failed to bring +up provisions, and, on August 23, Edward found himself with +some 7000 men at Leith, in like predicament with his +father before the battle of Falkirk. He was starved into +retreat. Immediately the Scots hung upon his rear, and +Douglas cut up an advance company of 300 men near +Melrose. The English had sacked Holyrood; they now +sacked Melrose Abbey, killing the prior and others; and +they burnt to the ground Dryburgh and other monasteries. +'But,' says Fordun, 'God rewarded them therefor.'</p> + +<p>Bruce instantly followed up his advantage. By the +middle of September, the Scots were before Bamborough +and Norham. Bamborough bought off the invaders; and +on September 26, Sir Roger de Horsley, the constable, as +well as the constables of Warkworth, Dunstanburgh, and +Alnwick castles, received a severe wigging from Edward +for not showing fight against such an inferior force. Norham +was defended by Sir Thomas Gray the elder against an +inadequate body of 200 Scots. Edward displayed great +energy of rebuke and counsel, while Robert steadily advanced +southwards. On October 14, the English army +barred the way on the ridge of Blackhowe Moor between +Biland and Rievaulx; but Bruce's rapid action enabled<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">139</a></span> +him to strike a decisive blow before the Earl of Carlisle, +who was at Boroughbridge with 2000 (surely not, as some say, +20,000) horse and foot, could effect a junction, if indeed he +really meant to do so.</p> + +<p>Douglas at once offered to storm the English position, +and Randolph, leaving his own division, led the way up the +hill as a volunteer. The Scots were strongly opposed by +Sir Ralph de Cobham, who was held to be the best knight +of his day in England, and by Sir Thomas Ughtred, constable +of Pickering, whose gallantry in the fight raised him +to a higher position than even Cobham. The assailants +were grievously embarrassed by stones rolled down upon +them and by the fire of the archers. Robert supported +them by sending 'the Irishry,' the Argyll Highlanders, and +the men of the Isles to scramble up the crags in flank. At +the top they were confronted by the main body under the +Earl of Richmond, but they charged with such impetuosity +as broke the English ranks and scattered them in flight; +Gray even uses the conventional expression, 'like a hare +before hounds.' 'In these days,' says John of Bridlington, +'the Lord took away the hearts of the English.' Richmond +was captured and held to heavy ransom (14,000 marks). +Lord Henri de Sully and other French knights surrendered +to Douglas; by arrangement with whom, King Robert soon +released them by way of diplomatic compliment to the King +of France. Edward narrowly escaped from Biland Abbey +and fled through the night to Bridlington, whence the prior +conducted him to Burstwick. Sir Walter the Steward pursued +as far as York. Robert occupied the abbeys of Biland +and Rievaulx and divided the spoils of the English camp +and the king's baggage. Then, making Malton his headquarters, +he wasted Yorkshire at his will, taking ransoms +from Ripon, Beverley, and other towns, and despoiling +religious houses; and he returned, with immense booty, +to keep Christmas in Scotland.</p> + +<p>Three calamitous invasions in one year might well have +induced reflection in a statesmanlike mind. They merely +excited Edward's impotent eagerness for revenge. But the +Earl of Carlisle, as doughty a warrior as the best, saw that +the contest was both hopeless and ruinous; and on January 3, +1322–23, he was closeted with Randolph at Lochmaben.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">140</a></span> +There and then they drafted an agreement. The fundamental +provisions were: (1) that each realm should have +its own national King; (2) that the Earl should aid King +Robert in maintaining Scotland against all gainsayers; and +(3) that King Robert and the Earl should maintain the +realm of England under the direction of a council of +twelve, six to be chosen by each party. Then, if the +King of England should assent to these conditions within +a year, King Robert was to found an abbey in Scotland, +of 500 marks rent, for the souls of the men slain in war, +and to pay an indemnity of 40,000 marks within ten +years; and the King of England was to have the marriage +of the heir male of the King of Scotland under advice of +the council of twelve.</p> + +<p>Harcla at once published the terms of the agreement, +and they were received with intense satisfaction on the +Border. He appears to have acted in concert with the +chief officers in these parts, and to have believed, or at +least professed, that he acted within the terms of his commission. +Edward, however, on January 8, ordered that +no truce be made without his knowledge, and summoned +Harcla to his presence; and on January 19, he sent a copy +of the Lochmaben indenture to his Council at York, with +the comment that it appeared to him 'fraught with great +danger.' He had already (January 13) instituted a search +of the Chancery rolls for any authorisation to Harcla to +treat with the Scots. On February 25, Harcla was arrested +in Carlisle Castle; and on March 3, he was tried, condemned, +and barbarously executed. The charge of treason, though +formally too well grounded, was essentially baseless; otherwise +it is unintelligible that Harcla should have limited his +measures of self-defence to the procurement of the formal +oaths of the northern sheriffs to stand by him 'in all things +touching the common good of England and the said peace.' +His action was simply the action of a strong, business-like, +and patriotic man, forgetful of finesse. His mistake lay in +omitting to obtain express authority to treat, and in neglecting +either to veil his contempt for the King, or to provide +against his natural resentment, inflamed as it was sure to +be by the envy of personal enemies.</p> + +<p>The death of Harcla, the keenest and ablest warrior in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">141</a></span> +England, did not remove the difficulties from Edward's +path. In a fortnight he was treating for peace—'was +frightened, and begged for peace,' according to the <i xml:lang="la" lang="la">Flores +Historiarum</i>—though in his own perversely maladroit +fashion. On March 21, Robert wrote to Lord Henri de +Sully, Edward's envoy, in substance this:</p> + +<blockquote> + +<p>The King of England's letter, of which you sent me a copy yesterday, +bears that he has granted a cessation of arms to the people of +Scotland at war with him. This language is very strange to me. In +former truces taken between us, I was named principal of the one +part, as he was of the other part, although he did not vouchsafe to +me the title of King. But on this occasion, no more mention is made +of me than of the least person in my realm; so that, in case of a +breach, I should be no more entitled than another to demand redress. +Do not be surprised, then, that I do not agree to this truce. If, however, +it were put before me in the proper way, I should willingly +sanction it, as I promised you. I send you a copy of the King's +letter; for I imagine you have not seen it, or, if you have, you have +paid but scant attention to its terms.</p></blockquote> + +<p>After some futile negotiations at Newcastle, a truce was +at last concluded at Bishopsthorpe, near York, to last till +June 12, and for thirteen years thereafter. On May 30, +1323, Edward ordered it to be proclaimed throughout +England; and on June 7, Robert ratified it at Berwick. +Each party was to evacuate all lands of the other by +June 12; neither party was to build or repair fortresses +on the March, excepting constructions in progress; and +Edward was to interpose no obstacle to any attempt of +Robert and his friends to obtain absolution at Rome. +During the negotiations, Edward had been summoning +his forces in England, Ireland, and Gascony, in the +belief that the Scots were really purposing another invasion; +but in the first days of June he countermanded +the muster.</p> + +<p>King Robert was sincerely anxious to set himself and +his people right with the Church. He despatched Randolph +as his ambassador. On his way south, Randolph, +with the Bishop of St Andrews, treated with Edward's +commissioners for a final peace; and, at any rate, on +November 25, he got Edward to write to the Pope and +the Cardinals in favour of a grant of absolution to the +Scots during the peace negotiations. How Randolph<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">142</a></span> +fared at Rome we learn from a letter of the Pope's to +Edward, dated January 1, 1323–24. First, he begged for +the usual indulgences necessary to enable him to fulfil his +vow to go on a crusade. The Pope refused: there would +be little good to the Holy Land or to his own soul, while +he lay under the Church's censure; but the request might +be reconsidered if he would effect a permanent peace with +England and satisfy the Church. Secondly, Randolph +prayed for safe conducts for Bruce's envoys, presently to +be sent to procure reconciliation with the Church. The +Pope refused, for the present, but he agreed to direct the +usual application to the princes on the line of route. +Thirdly, Randolph put forward Robert's readiness to join +the King of France in his proposed crusade, or, if the +King of France did not go, then to proceed himself or +send Randolph instead. The Pope replied that reconciliation +with the Church was an indispensable condition +precedent. Fourthly, Randolph declared that King Robert +and himself desired above all things to obtain peace and +reconciliation, and that it really lay with His Holiness to +bring their ardent desires to fruition. Let him address +himself to Robert as King, and Robert would readily +respond to his wishes; it was the reservation of the +royal title that blocked the way. The Pope consented +to address Robert by the royal title.</p> + +<p>Edward was keenly annoyed. The Pope, after setting +forth the facts of Randolph's interview, had earnestly +begged Edward not to take it ill that he had consented +to address Robert as King. It could do him no harm; +it could do Robert no good. He was intensely anxious +for peace, and, if he did not give Robert the royal title, +Robert would not look at his letters any more than he had +done before. But Edward did not agree. He bluntly +urged that the concession would prejudice his right and +his honour, bring discredit on the Church, and enable +Bruce to make capital of his wrong-doing. He recapitulated +his claims to Scotland, contended that no change +should be introduced during the truce, and pointed out +that the concession would be popularly construed as a +papal confirmation of Bruce's title. Let the title therefore +be reserved as before.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">143</a></span> +Then Edward played another card: he invited Edward +de Balliol, son of ex-King John, to come over to England. +The safe-conduct was issued on July 2; and it was not +Edward's fault that Balliol postponed his visit. Meantime, +in the midst of conflict with France over Aquitaine, Edward +continued negotiations with Robert for final peace. But +no agreement could be reached. The true cause appears +in Edward's letter of March 8, 1324–25, to the Pope. +There had recently been a meeting of envoys at York, +but the Scots would not yet budge from their old position, +and 'I could not meet their wishes without manifest +disherison of my royal crown.' His envoys had proposed +to refer the knotty point to the decision of His Holiness; +but 'this they absolutely declined.' The Scots, indeed, +had apparently stiffened their demands. According to +the Monk of Malmesbury, they had claimed not only the +independence of Scotland, but also the north of England +down to the gates of York (by right of conquest), and the +restoration of Bruce's manor of Writtle in Essex, as well +as of the famous coronation stone.</p> + +<p>In May, Scots envoys were again on the road to Rome, +and Edward wrote to the Pope, informing him that he was +sending ambassadors to guard his own interests. Again, +on September 23, he wrote to the Pope and the Cardinals +urging them not to recall the sentences of excommunication +till the Scots should surrender Berwick to him—Berwick, +captured treacherously in defiance of the papal truce. +The Pope consented, and on October 18 Edward expressed +effusive thanks. But he reaped no advantage +from the diplomatic victory: in three months he was +deposed by his Parliament for notorious incompetence.</p> + +<p>On January 25, 1326–27, Edward, Prince of Wales, a +boy of fifteen, was proclaimed King. He presently confirmed +the thirteen years' truce (February 15), and +appointed envoys to treat for final peace (March 4). +The meeting was to take place on the March on May 17. +But, on April 5, Edward III. summoned his power to +be at Newcastle by May 18, averring that he had sure +information that Robert was massing his troops on the +Border with the intention of invading England if his own +terms of peace were not conceded. It seems much more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">144</a></span> +likely that Robert's action was purely precautionary in +view of the disturbed condition of the English March; +but a hostile construction was favoured by the fact that +many of the most turbulent fellows in Northumberland +were Scots. On the other hand, Barbour is likely enough +to be right in asserting that Robert was unable to +obtain redress for the seizure of Scots vessels in English +and Flemish waters; and it may be, as he says, that for +this reason Robert openly renounced the truce. At the +same time, Robert must have heard of Edward's warlike +preparations by land and sea. This may be what Fordun +has in view when he says that the duplicity of the English +was at length laid bare. Edward's summons was issued +on April 5, and Froissart places Robert's formal defiance +'about Easter' (April 12); but this date must be nearly +two months too early. One thing is certain: Robert +was in no aggressive mood, and would not have resumed +hostilities without really serious provocation.</p> + +<p>About the middle of June a body of Scots crossed the +Border, and on July 4 they were at Appleby, almost in +touch with the Earl Marshal. Edward was at York, where +he had been joined by Sir John of Hainault, Lord of +Beaumont, with a body of heavy cavalry, between whom +and the English archers much bad blood had been spilt +in the streets of York. His army was very large—Barbour +says 50,000; Froissart says upwards of 40,000 men-at-arms; +Murimuth says three times as large and strong +as the Scots army—a force difficult alike to handle and +to feed in a rough and wasted country, especially in face +of the Scots veterans. On July 13, Edward had reached +Northallerton, and had learned that the Scots intended +to mass their forces near Carlisle.</p> + +<p>By this time the Scots army, under Randolph and +Douglas, had ravaged Coquetdale and penetrated into +the Episcopate of Durham. When Edward reached Durham +city, he was apprised of the passage of the Scots +by a track of smoking ruins and devastated fields. He +decided to bar their return. Advancing with his cavalry, +he crossed the Tyne at Haydon Bridge (July 26), leaving +his infantry on the south side. But the Scots did not +come, and between drenching rains and lack of provisions<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">145</a></span> +his troops were worn out in body and in temper. The men, +says Froissart, 'tore the meat out of each other's hands'; +and 'great murmurs arose in the army.' After a week's +distressful experience, he determined to seek the enemy +southwards, and offered a reward of £100 a year in land, +as well as knighthood, to the man that should bring him +in sight of them 'on hard and dry ground' fit for battle. +He crossed the Tyne at Haltwhistle fords, losing many +men in the swollen river. On the fourth day, Thomas +de Rokeby reported the Scots, and brought Edward face +to face with them on the Wear.</p> + +<p>The Scots were strongly posted on a rising ground +on the south bank: Froissart numbers them 24,000; +Barbour, much more probably, 10,000. Douglas made +a reconnaissance, and reported a strong army in seven +divisions. 'We will fight them,' cried Randolph, 'were +they more'; but Douglas counselled patience. Presently +Edward sent heralds, offering to retire far enough to allow +the Scots room to array themselves for battle on the north +side on the morrow; or, if the Scots preferred, to accept +like terms on the south side. It was an unconscious +repetition of the offer of Tomyris, Queen of Massagetai, +to Cyrus, on the Araxes river. But the Scots, evidently +too weak to fight in a plain field, replied that they would +do neither the one thing nor the other; that the King +and his barons saw they were in his kingdom and had +burnt and pillaged wherever they had passed, and that, +if this displeased the King, he might come and amend +it; for they would tarry there as long as they pleased.' +That night the English lay on their arms. Part of the +Scots also kept themselves in readiness, while the rest +retired to their huts, 'where they made marvellously great +fires, and, about midnight, such a blasting and noise with +their horns that it seemed as if all the great devils from +hell had been come there.'</p> + +<p>The next two days the Scots and English lay watching +each other across the Wear. On the first day, a thousand +English archers, supported by men-at-arms, attempted to +draw the Scots. Douglas, planting an ambush under +the Earl of Mar (who had at length joined the Scots) +and his own son Archibald of Douglas, rode forward,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">146</a></span> +with a cloak over his armour, and gradually gave way +to their onset, till he had enticed them within reach of +the ambush. At Douglas's signal, the ambush broke +upon the pursuers, and slew 300 of them. Next day, +the English put 1000 horsemen in ambush in a valley +behind the Scots position, and delivered a front attack. +Douglas was advancing to repel the assailants when he +was informed of the force in rear, and instantly drew +back his men. 'They flee,' cried some Englishmen; +but John of Hainault explained the manœuvre, and, +according to Barbour, pronounced the Scots captain fit +'to govern the Empire of Rome.'</p> + +<p>On the following morning—probably August 3—the +Scots were gone. They had moved about two miles +along the river, and occupied a still stronger position in +Stanhope Park. In the afternoon the English were again +facing them. About midnight, Douglas, with 200 horsemen—Barbour +says 500—crossed the Wear, and rode +boldly into the English camp. 'No guard, by St George!' +he exclaimed, on being discovered, as if he were an English +officer. He made right for the King's pavilion, and, shouting +his war-cry, actually 'cut two or three of its cords.' +The King most narrowly escaped capture or death. +Douglas got clear with but insignificant loss, and, collecting +his men by a prearranged note of his horn, he returned +to camp. Randolph, who was waiting under arms, ready +for rescue or aid, eagerly asked the news. 'Sir,' replied +Douglas, 'we have drawn blood.'</p> + +<p>The success of Douglas suggested to Randolph that a +larger party might have inflicted defeat on the English. +Douglas had his grave doubts. Randolph again proposed a +pitched battle. Douglas objected, in view of the disastrous +effects in case of defeat. No; better treat the English as +the fox treated the fisherman. The fox had entered the +fisherman's cottage and was eating a salmon. The fisherman +discovered him, and stood on the threshold with a +drawn sword in his hand. The fox, seeing the fisherman's +cloak on the bed, dragged it into the fire. Thereupon the +fisherman rushed to save his cloak, and the fox bolted out +at the unguarded door. Douglas, in fact, had planned a +mode of escape, and, though somewhat wet ('sumdele<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">147</a></span> +wat'), it would serve. Randolph gave way. So the Scots +made merry in the day time, burnt great fires at night, and +blew their horns 'as if all the world were theirs.' Occasional +skirmishes took place, and the English drew round the +Scots on both sides, leaving their rear open on a morass +believed to be impassable. Meantime Douglas made his +preparations.</p> + +<p>It was probably on the night of August 6–7 that Douglas +led the Scots army out of Stanhope Park. He took them +across the morass, about a mile wide, over a causeway of +branches, which the rear demolished as they passed. The +men led their horses, and only a few baggage animals stuck +fast. By daybreak the Scots were far on the way homewards. +The English had been completely outwitted. On +the day before, they had captured a Scots knight, who told +them that orders had been issued 'for all to be armed by +vespers and to follow the banner of Douglas,' he did not +know where. The English lords suspected a night attack, +and remained under arms. In the morning, two Scots +trumpeters, who had been left to blow misleading blasts, +were brought into camp. 'The Scots,' they said, 'are on +the march home, since midnight; they left us behind to +give you the information.' The English, fearing a ruse, +continued to stand to their arms till their scouts confirmed +the mortifying intelligence.</p> + +<p>The Scots were soon met by a considerable body of their +countrymen under the Earl of March and Sir John the +Steward. They all hurried back to Scotland by the western +march. The English retired to Durham, and then to York, +where the army was disbanded on August 15. Edward +is said to have shed bitter tears over the collapse of his +expedition. Some of the chroniclers allege unsupported +charges of treachery, and mistakenly accuse Mortimer of +accepting a heavy bribe to wink at the escape of the Scots. +But the plain fact is that the English were outgeneralled at +every turn.</p> + +<p>It was neither age nor sickness, as the chroniclers allege, +that prevented King Robert from leading the Weardale +foray. He was away in Ireland, creating a diversion. On +July 12, at Glendun in Antrim, he granted a truce for a +year to Henry de Maundeville, the English seneschal of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">148</a></span> +Ulster, and his people, on condition of their delivering a +certain quantity of wheat and barley at Lough Larne. The +expedition does not seem to have been directly prosperous; +the Irish, whom he had expected to rise and join him in +Ulster, having apparently broken faith.</p> + +<p>Immediately on the return of the Scots from Weardale, +King Robert passed into Northumberland. He sent Randolph +and Douglas to besiege Alnwick Castle; set down +another division before Norham Castle; and, with a third +body, himself overran the neighbourhood. He even granted +away the English lands to his chief followers. The attempt +on Alnwick was unsuccessful, and, the open country having +bought a truce, the leaders concentrated on Norham. On +October 1, while Bruce still lay before Norham, Edward +appointed commissioners to treat with him for final peace. +After negotiations at Newcastle and York, the treaty was +signed by Robert at Edinburgh on March 17; confirmed +by the English Parliament on April 24; and finally, on +May 4, signed by Edward at Northampton. Edward conceded +in the fullest terms the absolute independence of +Scotland as the marches stood in the days of Alexander III., +and agreed to deliver up all extant documents relating to +the overlordship, and in any case to annul them; and he +consented to aid Robert to obtain the revocation of the +papal processes. Robert agreed to pay £20,000 sterling +in three years. And the peace was to be cemented by the +marriage of David, the Scots heir-apparent, a boy of four, +with Joan, King Edward's sister, a girl of six. In England, +the peace was freely stigmatised as 'shameful,' and the +marriage as 'base'; partly on patriotic grounds, partly from +dislike of Queen Isabella and Mortimer, who guided the +policy of the King. The news of the death of the King of +France no doubt gave an impulse to the English decision, +for it would be necessary for Edward to have his hands +free to assert his claim to the succession. The conditions +were alike 'honourable for the Scots and necessary for +England.'</p> + +<hr /> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">149</a></span></p> + +<h2 class="vspace"><a name="CHAPTER_XIII" id="CHAPTER_XIII">CHAPTER XIII</a><br /> + +<span class="subhead">THE HEART OF THE BRUCE</span></h2> + +<p>King Robert the Bruce died at Cardross on the +Clyde, on June 7, 1329, a little more than a month +before the completion of his fifty-fifth year. The cause +of his death is said to have been leprosy. Barbour says +it was the development of a severe cold, a benumbment +contracted in the hardships of his early wanderings. +Apart from specific disease, the strain of his laborious +reign of nearly a quarter of a century would have shaken +the strongest constitution of man.</p> + +<p>In the last three years he had been struck by two severe +bereavements: the death of his son-in-law, Sir Walter the +Steward, a knight of great promise, on April 9, 1326; and +the death of the queen, at Cullen, on October 26, 1327. +In the latter year, indeed, in spite of increasing illness, he +had taken the field in Ireland and in Northumberland. +But he had been unable to attend the marriage of David +and Joan at Berwick in July 1328. Still he continued to +move about quietly. When, however, Douglas brought +him back from a visit to Galloway in the end of March +1329, it was not to be concealed that 'there was no way +for him but death.' And, accordingly, he set his house +in order.</p> + +<p>On October 15, 1328, the Pope had at last granted +absolution to Robert from the excommunication pronounced +by the cardinals, and, on November 5, authorised +his confessor to give him plenary remission in the hour +of death.</p> + +<p>At a parliament held on November 14, 1328, at Scone, +it had been settled that, in the event of David's dying +without heir male of his body begotten, Robert the +Steward, son of Marjory, should succeed; and that, if +King Robert died during David's minority, Randolph<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">150</a></span> +should be regent, and, failing Randolph, Douglas. David +and Joan were crowned, and David received homage and +fealty.</p> + +<p>On May 11, 1329, the King assembled his prelates and +barons to hear his last wishes. He gave directions for +liberal largess to religious houses, with special consideration +for Melrose Abbey, where he desired his heart to +be buried. He declared his long-cherished intention—Froissart +says his 'solemn vow'—after bringing his realm +to peace, 'to go forth and war with the enemies of Christ, +the adversaries of our holy Christian faith.' As he had +been unable to carry out his fixed purpose, he wished +his heart to be taken and borne against the foes of God. +On Douglas was laid this great and noble charge. Froissart +mentions a specific instruction: 'I wish that you convey +my heart to the Holy Sepulchre where our Lord lay, and +present it there, seeing my body cannot go thither. And +wherever you come,' added the King, 'let it be known +that you carry with you the heart of King Robert of Scotland, +at his own instance and desire, to be presented at the +Holy Sepulchre.' Douglas solemnly pledged himself to this +last faithful service.</p> + +<p>On the death of King Robert, his heart was embalmed, +and enclosed in a silver casket 'cunningly enamelled,' +which Douglas bore always about his neck. Strangely +enough, even in death, the King came in conflict with +Rome; for the excision of his heart was a breach of a +Papal Bull of 1299, involving excommunication of the +mutilators, and excluding the body from ecclesiastical +burial. On August 13, 1331, the Pope, at the prayer of +Randolph, granted absolution to all that had taken part +'in the inhuman and cruel treatment' of the King's body.</p> + +<p>The body was embalmed, and carried through the +Lennox, and by Dunipace and Cambuskenneth, to +repose with the body of the Queen in Dunfermline +Abbey—since Malcolm Canmore, the last resting-place +of the Kings of Scotland. Over the King's grave was +erected a marble monument, which he had ordered from +Paris a twelvemonth before his death. It might have been +supposed that never in time would any Scotsman lay a rude +hand on the sepulchre of the greatest of Scottish kings;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">151</a></span> +yet on March 28, 1560, an insensate rabble of 'Reformers' +razed the abbey to the ground, and broke in pieces the +royal monument. In 1818, when foundations for a new +church were being cleared, there were found, in a grave in +front of the spot where the high altar of the Abbey Church +had stood, the bones of a man whose breast-bone had +been sawn asunder, and who had been buried in fine linen +shot with gold thread. The probability that these were the +bones of Bruce was enhanced by the surrounding fragments +of black and white marble, well-polished, carved, and gilt. +There lay also a mouldering skull, which five centuries +agone may have held the powerful brain that dominated +the field of Bannockburn.</p> + +<p>Douglas set about his preparations. Now that peace +with England was established, and Randolph held the +reins of State, there was no national reason why Douglas +could not be spared for a time. Nor would warriors like +Bruce and his paladins have ever weighed for a moment +the risks of the sacred mission. It seems a misapprehension +to suggest either selfishness or ingratitude on the part of +the dying King. Nor is there any substantial ground for +imagining that Robert feared any lack of harmony between +his two great lieutenants. Barbour's casual suggestion of +petty rivalry between them cannot weigh for a moment +against their constant association in scores of enterprises. +Their rivalry was of noble quality. The King had made a +knightly vow, and that vow he must, as far as might be, +perform; it was hardly less a national than a personal +obligation.</p> + +<p>On September 1, Douglas obtained from Edward III. +letters of protection for seven years, and a letter of commendation +to Alfonso XI., King of Castile and Leon. +On February 1, 1329–30, the day of the patron saint of +his house, St Bride, he bestowed lands on the Abbey of +Newbattle to secure her special intercession in his spiritual +interests. Shortly thereafter he set out on his mission, +with 'a noble company'—one knight banneret, seven +other knights, twenty-six squires, and a large retinue. +According to Froissart, he sailed from Montrose to Sluys, +where he lay twelve days, thinking he might be joined by +other knights 'going beyond the sea to Jerusalem'; and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">152</a></span> +then to Valencia in Spain. According to Barbour he +sailed from Berwick direct to Seville. In any case, he +proceeded to the camp of Alfonso, then on his frontier +warring against Osmyn, the Moorish King of Granada, +and was received with honour befitting his fame and his +mission. The knights with Alfonso were eagerly curious +to see the famous Scot; and one notable warrior expressed +his great surprise that Douglas's face was not seamed with +scars like his own. 'Praised be God!' said Douglas, 'I +always had hands to defend my head.'</p> + +<p>On August 25, 1330, the Christian and Moorish armies +faced each other near Theba on the Andalusian frontier. +Froissart states that Douglas mistook a forward movement +of the Spanish troops for the onset of battle, and charged +the Moors furiously; but the Spaniards had halted and +left him unsupported. The story seems little consonant +with Douglas's warlike intelligence. Barbour says that +Alfonso assigned to Douglas the command of the van—which +is very unlikely, unless he also assigned him an +interpreter. He also asserts that Douglas hurled the +precious casket 'a stone-cast and well more' into the +ranks of the enemy, <span class="locked">exclaiming—</span></p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i3">'"Now pass thou forth before<br /></span> +<span class="i0">As thou wast wont in field to be,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And I shall follow, or else dee"';<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p class="in0">and that he fought his way to it and recovered it, 'taking +it up with great daintie.' This, too, is but a fantastic +embellishment of the cloister. Barbour, of course, proceeds +to rout the Moors and to make Douglas press on +ahead of his company, attended by only ten men. Seeing +Sir William de St Clair surrounded, however, Douglas +spurred to his friend's rescue, but was overpowered by +numbers and slain. Among those that fell with him were +Sir William de St Clair and Sir Robert and Sir Walter +Logan.</p> + +<p>The bones of Douglas were brought home by Sir +William de Keith, who had been kept out of the battle by +a broken arm, and were buried in the church of St Bride +of Douglas. The silver casket with the heart of Bruce +was buried by Randolph, 'with great worship,' in Melrose +Abbey.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">153</a></span> +Douglas has been charged with breach of trust. It is +argued that he ought not to have gone to Spain, but to +have crossed the continent to Venice or the south of +France, and made direct for Jerusalem. It is hardly +worth while to remark that this is just what Boece says he +did, his death taking place in Spain on his way home. It +is more to the purpose that the Holy Sepulchre was then +in the hands of the Saracens, and that Spain was the +central point of opposition to the infidels. But what +Douglas ought or ought not to have done depends solely +on the precise terms of his trust; and it may be taken as +certain that he knew King Robert's mind better than +either Barbour or Froissart, or even their critics, and that +he decided on his course in consultation with Randolph +and the other magnates, prelates as well as barons. +Edward's safe conduct and commendatory letter show by +their terms that his going to Spain was no afterthought, +but his original intention. To attribute to Douglas lack of +'strength of purpose' is to miss the whole significance of +his career.</p> + +<div class="tb">*<span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span></div> + +<p>King Robert must obviously have been a man of +powerful physique and iron constitution. The early hardships +and continuous toils of his reign could not have been +sustained by any ordinary frame; and his recorded feats of +strength, such as in the case of Wallace have been scouted +as fabulous, have always been accepted without question. +The Merton MS. of the 'Flores Historiarum' calls him 'a +very powerful man,' on the occasion of his striking down +Comyn. The killing of Sir Henry de Bohun in face of +both armies speaks convincingly of muscle as well as of +nerve. If the bones discovered in 1818 were his, they indicate +that he stood about six feet in height. 'In figure,' says +Major, 'he was graceful and athletic, with broad shoulders. +His features were handsome, and he had the yellow hair +of the northern race, and blue and sparkling eyes.'</p> + +<p>Bruce's outstanding characteristic, in Barbour's analysis, +was his 'hardiment:' he 'hardy was of head and hand.' +That is to say, he was a strong, bold, and resolute soldier. +But with hardiment he joined 'wit'—judgment, prudence, +measure; and the union of the two is 'worship.' This<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">154</a></span> +'worship' was undoubtedly the fundamental cause of +Bruce's great career; and the most simple and conspicuous +illustration of it is seen in the dramatic episode of De +Bohun's death. Fordun pronounces that he 'was, beyond +all living men of his day, a valiant knight.' And Barbour +sums <span class="locked">up—</span></p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="iq">'To whom, into gude chevelry,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">I dar peir nane, wes in his day.<br /></span> +<span class="i0">For he led hym with mesure ay.'<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p>It was this splendid hardiment controlled and directed +by cool judgment, and supported by untiring industry in +details, that ranked King Robert not merely as the second +knight in Christendom, but as one of the most renowned +generals of the age. His patient drudgery of preparation, +his wary dispositions, his firmness of resolution, his promptitude +to mark and remedy a weakness of his own and to +strike hard at a weakness of the enemy, were superbly +illustrated on the field of Bannockburn. King Robert's +military renown does not need the false attribution of +tactical discoveries that he certainly did not make. It was +not Bannockburn that showed him what infantry could do +against mailed cavalry; nor was it the example of the +Flemings at Courtrai. Sir William Wallace had proved +the power of the schiltron before Bannockburn and before +Courtrai; and he is not to be deprived of the honour by +the imperfect historical knowledge of Sir Thomas Gray. +If the tactic was known in these islands before the time of +Wallace, or if Wallace gained the knowledge of it from +elsewhere, the fact yet remains to be historically demonstrated. +King Robert and his generals simply practised +the lesson of Wallace with notable ability. Nor did they +advance beyond Wallace in the still more important +principles of large strategy. But, apart from this, the +Bruce's capacity as a military commander stands forth pre-eminent. +And though many painful incidents inevitably +stain the records of his campaigns, they are attributable +more to the age than to the man. It is impossible to +charge on his memory any reckless or wanton cruelty. +His mind with all its sternness ever tended to clemency, +and his constitutional prudence, or measure, forbade +purposeless excess.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">155</a></span> +The incessant demands of war left Robert but scant +leisure for internal administration, notwithstanding the +diligent service of his eminently capable lieutenants. +Apart from necessary inference and from incidental indications, +his care for civil order and good government is +conspicuously manifested in the legislation of the Scone +Parliament, December 3, 1318; and there is abundant +evidence of his fostering watchfulness over the commercial +traffic with Continental countries. The Cambuskenneth +Parliament, July 15, 1326, has a constitutional interest, as +the first great council where burgesses are known to have +sat with the baronage. The trading communities were +worth consultation when a heavy war tax was to be levied, +and the country was so cruelly impoverished. There can +be no doubt that Robert's management of home affairs +was watchful, energetic, and liberal.</p> + +<p>In the conduct of his foreign relations, the Bruce proved +himself an adept in diplomacy. His dealings with the +Continental princes, mainly in regard to shipping and +commerce, were conciliatory and businesslike. His political +transactions with the English sovereign and with the +Pope were uniformly characterised by astute perception, +reasonableness to the point of generosity, courteous but +rigid firmness on every essential point, and fidelity to +engagements.</p> + +<p>The occupations of the King's late and brief leisure may +be read between the lines of the Exchequer Rolls: how he +kept open house at Cardross, dispensed gifts and charities, +pottered (with Randolph) at shipbuilding, sailed his great +ship between Cardross and Tarbet, built Tarbet Castle, +added a wing to his mansion, tended his garden, and so +forth; and how he kept a pet lion at Perth, where he +seems to have spent parts of his last two years.</p> + +<p>Bruce was twice married. First, to Isabel, daughter of +the Earl of Mar, the mother of Marjory. Second, to +Elizabeth, eldest daughter of De Burgh, Earl of Ulster, +who bore him two sons and two daughters: Matilda and +Margaret, after 1316; David, March 5, 1324; and John, +who died in infancy. The most distinguished of his +other children, Sir Robert de Brus, fell at Dupplin in +1332.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">156</a></span> +Bruce has been called by Lord Hailes (after Rapin) the +'restorer of Scottish monarchy.' The monarchy was a +small matter; Bruce was the restorer of Scottish independence. +But the conditions of the case are apt to be misconceived. +The incalculable services of Sir William +Wallace, through nearly ten years of incomparably heroic +struggle against the great Edward in his full vigour, are too +often forgotten, or belittled. But for Wallace, it is more +than probable that Bruce would never have been King of +Scotland. He built on Wallace's foundations.</p> + +<p>Comyn being dead, Bruce possessed the admitted right +to the crown, without even the semblance of competition—a +powerful aid in his enterprise. He started in the +acquisitive spirit of an Anglo-Norman baron, and was +carried through largely by his personal gallantry, his +military capacity, his consummate prudence, and his +indomitable resolution. Though the mass of the people +rallied to him but slowly through many years, yet he at +once gained the more ardent patriots; and, in particular, +he had the instant support of the leading prelates, and, at +the Dundee Parliament on February 24, 1308–9, the formal +adhesion of the clergy generally. Nor is it easy to overestimate +the aid of three such paladins as Edward de Brus, +Randolph, and Douglas. And not the least of the grounds +of Bruce's success is to be sought in the feebleness and +foolishness of Edward II. and the stupid oppressions +practised by his local officers. Still, with full acknowledgment +of these supports, King Robert was and is the central +figure in the final establishment of the independence of +Scotland.</p> + +<p>One is strongly inclined to believe that the services of +Sir Edward de Brus, Lord of Galloway and Earl of +Carrick, have been seriously underrated, partly no doubt +through his own besetting fault. When we remember how +boldly he is said to have counselled action on the return +from Rathlin, how vigorously he cleared the English out of +his lordship of Galloway, and how ably he bore the brunt +of the heaviest fighting at Bannockburn, we cannot but +suspect that his glory has been unduly dimmed by the +splendour of his brother, and by the inappreciation of his +monkish critics. The main certainty about his hapless<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">157</a></span> +expedition to Ireland is the certainty that he fought with +the most chivalrous ardour. He was not only 'hardy' +but, according to Barbour, 'outrageous hardy'—a prototype +of Hotspur. His habitual exaltation of mind is well +expressed by the Archdeacon, when he describes him in +face of vastly superior numbers at Kilross:</p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="i10">'The more they be,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">The more honoùr allout have we,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">If that we bear us manfully.'<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p class="in0">Undoubtedly his 'hardiment' overbore his 'wit'; yet one +may safely doubt whether the Archdeacon was the man +to take his military measure. At the very least, he must +have been a powerful force in urging unmitigated hostility +against the English; and his dash in battle must have +proved a potent force on many a stricken field.</p> + +<p>In the absence of Sir Edward, Randolph ranked as first +lieutenant. He was Bruce's nephew, son of Isabel de +Brus and Thomas Randolph of <span class="locked">Strathdon.<a name="FNanchor_2" id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">2</a></span> From Lord +of Nithsdale, he blossomed into Earl of Moray, and Lord +of Annandale and of Man. As soldier, diplomatist, and +statesman, he displayed pre-eminent ability. Barbour represents +him as of moderate stature, proportionably built, +'with broad visage, pleasing and fair,' and a courteous +manner. 'A man he was,' says Lord Hailes, most justly, +'to be remembered while integrity, prudence, and valour +are held in esteem among men.' He survived King +Robert a little over three years.</p> + +<p>The good Sir James of Douglas ranked second to Randolph<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">158</a></span> +only because Randolph was the King's nephew. +From his early teens he displayed a gallant and chivalrous +spirit, a mind set on honour, and withal a conspicuous gift +of strategic device. If we may rely on Barbour, he was +even more cautious than the well-balanced Randolph; yet, +when occasion served, he could display the adventurous +dash of Sir Edward de Brus; and he exhibited a splendid +tenacity. According to Froissart, he was 'esteemed the +bravest and most enterprising knight in the two kingdoms.' +Like most great commanders, he rendered his men devoted +to him by a large generosity, not merely in division of the +spoils, but also in recognition of valiant deeds. Barbour +tells us that</p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="iq">'He had intill custom allway,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Quhen euir he com till hard assay,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">To press hym the chiftane to sla;'<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p class="in0">a bold principle that often decided the fight—like Bruce's +principle of striking hard at the foremost line. After he +slew Sir Robert de Neville,</p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="iq">'The dreid of the Lorde Dowglass,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And his renoun swa scalit wass<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Throu-out the marchis of Yngland<br /></span> +<span class="i0">That all that war tharin duelland<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Thai dred him as the deuill of hell.'<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p class="in0">And Barbour had often heard tell that wives would frighten +their wayward children into obedience by threatening to deliver +them to the Black Douglas. The Leicester chronicler +says 'the English feared him more than all other Scotsmen'; +for 'every archer he could take, either his right +hand he cut off or his right eye he plucked out,' and, for +the sake of the archers, he always took his vengeance on +an Englishman in the severest form he could devise. This +view is not corroborated, however, and it may be a generalisation +from some particular case. But, while terrible to +the enemy—'a brave hammerer of the English,' as Fordun +says—Douglas is represented as charming to his friends.</p> + +<div class="poem-container"> +<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> +<span class="iq">'But he wes nocht sa fayr that we<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Suld spek gretly off his beaute:<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">159</a></span><br /></span> +<span class="i0">In <span class="locked">wysage<a name="FNanchor_3" id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">3</a></span> wes he sumdeill <span class="locked">gray,<a name="FNanchor_4" id="FNanchor_4" href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">4</a></span><br /></span> +<span class="i0">And had blak <span class="locked">har,<a name="FNanchor_5" id="FNanchor_5" href="#Footnote_5" class="fnanchor">5</a></span> as Ic hard say;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">Bot off <span class="locked">lymmys<a name="FNanchor_6" id="FNanchor_6" href="#Footnote_6" class="fnanchor">6</a></span> he wes weill maid,<br /></span> +<span class="i0">With <span class="locked">banis<a name="FNanchor_7" id="FNanchor_7" href="#Footnote_7" class="fnanchor">7</a></span> gret & schuldrys <span class="locked">braid.<a name="FNanchor_8" id="FNanchor_8" href="#Footnote_8" class="fnanchor">8</a></span><br /></span> +<span class="i0">His body wes weyll maid and <span class="locked">lenye,<a name="FNanchor_9" id="FNanchor_9" href="#Footnote_9" class="fnanchor">9</a></span><br /></span> +<span class="i0">As thai that saw hym said to me ...<br /></span> +<span class="i0">And in spek <span class="locked">wlispyt<a name="FNanchor_10" id="FNanchor_10" href="#Footnote_10" class="fnanchor">10</a></span> he sum deill;<br /></span> +<span class="i0">But that <span class="locked">sat<a name="FNanchor_11" id="FNanchor_11" href="#Footnote_11" class="fnanchor">11</a></span> him rycht wondre weill.'<br /></span> +</div></div> +</div> + +<p class="in0">Scott's picture of the Knight of the Tomb, while based on +Barbour's description, verges on caricature.</p> + +<div class="tb">*<span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span><span class="in2">*</span></div> + +<p>Was King Robert the Bruce a patriot? The question, +startling as it may be, especially to trustful readers of uncritical +laudations, may no longer be avoided.</p> + +<p>It is not necessary to repeat the outlines of his political +attitude during the storm and stress of Wallace's memorable +struggle. Can it be supposed, then, that a man may become +patriotic after his thirty-first year? With his assumption of +the kingly office, Bruce's baronial and royal interests coincided +with the interests of Scotland, and it may be that +some feeling of the nature of patriotism may have thus developed +in his breast. The manifesto of the barons and +other laymen in 1320, apart from its dramatic purpose, may +be taken to indicate that the external reasons for the King's +profession of patriotism were not less potent than his private +reasons. Let us concede to him the benefit even of grievous +doubt. For, be his motives what they may, the practical +outcome was the decisive establishment of the independence +of the realm of Scotland, and he remains for ever the +greatest of the line of Scottish Kings.</p> + +<div class="newpage footnotes"> +<h2 class="nobreak"><a name="FOOTNOTES" id="FOOTNOTES">FOOTNOTES</a></h2> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_1" id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="fnanchor">1</a> Hemingburgh also gives February 10; Rishanger, Walsingham, +and others give January 29. It is the difference between iv. <i>Id.</i> +Feb. and iv. <i>Kal.</i> Feb. Probably both dates are wrong. The true +date, it is suggested, is January 27—'Thursday next before Carne-prevyum' +(<i>Cal.</i> ii., p. 486, under August 4, 1306).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_2" id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="fnanchor">2</a> So say the modern authorities. The chroniclers call him Bruce's +'nephew,' and Bruce himself calls him 'nepos'; and Boece calls +him David's 'cousin.' But is not 'nephew' used here, not in the +present strict sense, but in the wider sense of young relative? Bruce's +father and mother were married not before 1270 at earliest. Isabel +was married to the King of Norway on November 15, 1293; and probably +the marriage was in contemplation when her father and she +went to Norway in autumn, 1292. Was she a widow, then, at 21? +Randolph was present with his father at proceedings in the Succession +case at Berwick in August 1292. If, then, he was the son of Isabel, +he must have been a mere child—five or six at most. If there was +another sister Isabel (Bain), the age difficulty remains. Was Isabel—if +Isabel <em>was</em> Randolph's mother's name—not the sister, but the +aunt, of Bruce? And was Randolph really Bruce's <em>cousin</em>?</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_3" id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="fnanchor">3</a> Visage.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_4" id="Footnote_4" href="#FNanchor_4" class="fnanchor">4</a> Somewhat gray (swarthy).</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_5" id="Footnote_5" href="#FNanchor_5" class="fnanchor">5</a> Hair.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_6" id="Footnote_6" href="#FNanchor_6" class="fnanchor">6</a> Limbs.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_7" id="Footnote_7" href="#FNanchor_7" class="fnanchor">7</a> Bones.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_8" id="Footnote_8" href="#FNanchor_8" class="fnanchor">8</a> Shoulders broad.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_9" id="Footnote_9" href="#FNanchor_9" class="fnanchor">9</a> Lean.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_10" id="Footnote_10" href="#FNanchor_10" class="fnanchor">10</a> Lisped.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"> + +<p><a name="Footnote_11" id="Footnote_11" href="#FNanchor_11" class="fnanchor">11</a> Became.</p></div> +</div> + +<div class="newpage transnote"> +<h2 class="nobreak"><a name="Transcribers_Notes" id="Transcribers_Notes">Transcriber's Notes</a></h2> + +<p>Punctuation and spelling were made consistent when a predominant +preference was found in this book; otherwise they were not changed.</p> + +<p>Simple typographical errors were corrected; occasional unbalanced +quotation marks retained.</p> + +<p>Ambiguous hyphens at the ends of lines were retained.</p> + +<p>Page <a href="#Page_35">35</a>: Unmatched closing single quotation mark after "is a traitor'".</p> + +<p>Page <a href="#Page_43">43</a>: "David ap Griffith" means "son of" (Welch origin).</p> +</div> + +<div>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 44695 ***</div> +</body> +</html> diff --git a/44695-h/images/cover.jpg b/44695-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b52ea5e --- /dev/null +++ b/44695-h/images/cover.jpg diff --git a/44695-h/images/icover.jpg b/44695-h/images/icover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..197970c --- /dev/null +++ b/44695-h/images/icover.jpg diff --git a/44695-h/images/title.jpg b/44695-h/images/title.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..97d0571 --- /dev/null +++ b/44695-h/images/title.jpg |
