summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/53170-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/53170-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/53170-0.txt3949
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 3949 deletions
diff --git a/old/53170-0.txt b/old/53170-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 0f72aed..0000000
--- a/old/53170-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3949 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of Betrayed Armenia, by Diana Agabeg Apcar
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: Betrayed Armenia
-
-Author: Diana Agabeg Apcar
-
-Release Date: September 30, 2016 [EBook #53170]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BETRAYED ARMENIA ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Cindy Horton and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
-
-
-
-
-
-Transcriber’s Note: you will find both Christian(ity, etc) and
-christian used in this book, seemingly interchangeably; spelling of
-names is also variable.
-
-
-
-
-When this book was written, the writer was under the supposition then
-generally current that the Armenian Massacres of April, 1909, in
-Cilicia were instigated by Abdul Hamid and his Yildiz Clique. Babikian
-Effendi, the Armenian deputy who went to Adana from Constantinople
-to investigate into the massacres, plainly reported that all
-investigations had failed to trace them to Abdul Hamid and his Yildiz
-Clique. Babikian Effendi, as was to be expected, died suddenly on
-his return to Constantinople, but later on it became known that the
-massacres of April, 1909, had been planned, prepared, organized and
-carried into execution by the Constitutional Government of what has
-been called “Liberal Turks” or “Young Turks.”
-
-[Illustration: THEY TORE THE BABES FROM THE ARMS OF THEIR MOTHERS, TO
-HACK THEM TO PIECES WITH KNIVES, OR THROW THEM ALIVE INTO THE FIRE.]
-
-
-
-
- BETRAYED ARMENIA.
-
- BY
- DIANA AGABEG APCAR.
-
- ILLUSTRATED.
-
- THESE ARE THEY WHICH CAME OUT
- OF GREAT TRIBULATION.
-
- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED,
- BUT TRANSLATIONS INTO FRENCH AND ARMENIAN PERMITTED.
-
- YOKOHAMA:
- THE “JAPAN GAZETTE” PRESS.
- 1910.
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS.
-
-
- PAGE.
-
- Why and Wherefore 3
-
- Disinterested Evidence 5
-
- Preface to 2nd Printing 8
-
- Introduction 9
-
- PART I.
-
- The Armenian Massacres and the Treaty of Berlin 19
-
- The Armenian Massacres and the Turkish Constitution 25
-
- The Armenian Massacres and the Armenian People 34
-
- The Armenian Massacres and the Future of the Armenians 37
-
- The Armenian Massacres and Civilized Europe 42
-
- PART II.
-
- Out of the Depths 49
-
- What the Turkish Constitution Means for the Armenians 51
-
- The Armenian Question 53
-
- Open Letter to the Honorable President William Howard Taft 56
-
- Abdul Hamid, the Triumph of Crime 58
-
- L’Avenir 60
-
- The Origin of the Armenians--The Introduction of Christianity
- into Armenia--Decline and Grand Revival 63
-
-
-
-
-LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
-
-
- PAGE.
-
- They Tore the Babes from the Arms of their Mothers Frontispiece
-
- Scene of the Massacres in Asia Minor 4
-
- In this House 115 Women and Children were Roasted Alive 5
-
- Ruined Church and Homes at Adana 6
-
- General Prince Loris Melikoff 19
-
- General Ter Goukassoff 24
-
- Muckertich Khirimian 30
-
- Matthevose Ezmerlian 33
-
- Nerses Varjabetian 46
-
- Minaret at Erivan, one of the Cities Tradition Ascribes to be
- Founded by Noah 64
-
- Great and Little Ararat 66
-
- Abgar King of Armenia 70
-
- Soorb Gregore Loosavoritch 74
-
- The Cathedral of Etchmiatzi 76
-
-
-
-
-WHY AND WHEREFORE.
-
-
-In making a study of my race, I have found three marked characteristics
-Intelligence--Energy--Industry. Combined with these three
-characteristics is an intense Love of Nationality. We live in a
-complex world. In an independent people these characteristics and this
-sentiment are laudable Virtues. In a subject people they are Crimes.
-
-After I had laid this bitter Truth to heart, I did not have to seek for
-the Why and Wherefore of the Armenian Massacres.
-
-The Armenian Massacres stand without their parallel in history. The
-human mind staggers to contemplate the fiendish orgies of which they
-have been the victims, and no pen can describe their horrors: and this
-helpless christian people are to-day in the same deadly peril as they
-have been since the famous Treaty of Berlin consigned them bound hand
-and foot to the mercy of their executioners.
-
-The Armenians may be led again “as sheep to the slaughter” and the
-work of extermination may be completed--Jesus Christ was crucified on
-Calvary and the servant is not greater than his Lord--but the work of
-their extermination can only be completed when the evil influences in
-the Turkish Empire have reached their culminating point. Hitherto the
-Powers of Europe have by their jealousies and rivalries cultivated
-these evil influences, they have watered them and made them grow,
-but when their culminating point is reached, they must re-act on
-Christendom and the natural consequence must follow. Those who sow the
-wind, must reap the whirlwind. It is in the natural order of things.
-
-I will allow that Liberty, Justice, Equality, Fraternity are the
-watchwords of Young Turkey, but Young Turkey is only a small minority;
-the great majority of the Turkish nation are not Young Turks.
-
-The question therefore resolves itself into this critical point: “What
-will Christendom do even now?”
-
-[Illustration: SCENE OF THE MASSACRES IN ASIA MINOR.
-
-The trouble began in Adana. An armed mob strengthened and augmented
-by soldiers fell in overwhelming numbers upon the unarmed Christians.
-The Armenian population of Antioch and vicinity were practically wiped
-out and the Armenian villages in the Alexandretta district destroyed
-with immense loss of life. Hadjim, Kessab and the neighbouring villages
-were burned. The Armenian quarter in Tarsus was ruined and ill-omened
-Marash stained again with the blood of thousands of Armenians. Zeitoon
-was desolated. The entire population of Kirikon between Aleppo and
-Alexandretta were massacred to the last babe. The mob and the soldiers
-burned what they could not carry away, so that the material loss has
-been enormous. In place of the former abundance and thriving industries
-there are instead desolated provinces and the charred and blackened
-remains of pillaged and ruined homes, and the residue of those who
-escaped massacre are reduced to homelessness and starvation.]
-
-
-
-
-DISINTERESTED EVIDENCE.
-
-
-I have thought it advisable to insert a few extracts from accounts of
-the Massacres of April, 1909, given by disinterested witnesses.
-
-[Illustration: IN THIS HOUSE 115 WOMEN AND CHILDREN WERE ROASTED ALIVE.
-
-History repeats itself. In 1895 Turkish soldiers fell upon seventy
-to eighty young women and girls in a church, where they had fled for
-refuge, and after hideously outraging them, barricaded them in, setting
-fire to the building at the same time, and derisively shouting to their
-victims as they were being roasted alive, to call upon their Christ to
-save them now.]
-
- “We are having a perfectly hideous time here. Thousands have
- been murdered--25,000 in this province they say; but the
- number is probably greater, for every Christian village was
- wiped out. In Adana about 5000 have perished. After Turks and
- Armenians had made peace, the Turks came in the night with hose
- and kerosene, and set fire to what remained of the Armenian
- quarter. Next day the French and Armenian schools were fired.
- Nearly everyone in the Armenian school perished, anybody trying
- to escape being shot down by the soldiers.”
-
- “The Turkish Authorities do nothing except arrest unoffending
- Armenians, from whom by torture they extort the most fanciful
- confessions. Even the wounded are not safe from their
- injustice. A man was being carried in to me yesterday when he
- was seized and taken off to gaol. I dare not think what his
- fate may be.”
-
- “For fiends incarnate commend me to the Turks. Nobody is safe
- from them. They murder babies in front of their mothers; they
- half murder men, and violate the wives while the husbands are
- lying there dying in pools of blood.”
-
- “The authorities did nothing, and the soldiers were worse
- than the crowd, for they were better armed. One house in our
- quarter was burned with 115 people inside. We counted the
- bodies. The soldiers set fire to the door, and as the windows
- had iron bars, nobody could get out. Everybody in the house
- was roasted alive. They were all women and children and old
- people.”--Extract from letter of Mrs. Doughty-Wylie, wife of
- British Consul at Adana; published in the London “Daily Mail.”
-
- * * * * *
-
- “The soldiers led the way in these horrors and were guilty of
- atrocities so terrible that they can never be described in a
- public print. Even the soldiers landed at Mersina--the soldiers
- sent expressly to restore order--added to the crimes and for
- three days continued the murders unchecked.”--Extract from the
- London “Daily Mail.”
-
- * * * * *
-
-[Illustration: RUINED CHURCH AND HOMES AT ADANA.]
-
- “The outbreak began in the Armenian bazaar on April 14th, and
- on the pretence that an Armenian revolt was in progress the
- Redifs or reserves were called out. These, as villainous a crew
- as could well be found, had arms and ammunition served out to
- them, and immediately joined in the slaughter, and all the
- worst of the subsequent killing, looting, and house burning was
- done by them.”
-
- “The Armenians did not take their punishment lying down. Their
- quarter of the town was so well defended that the mob, mad
- as they were with lust for blood, would not venture into it.
- Houses on the outskirts were besieged by thousands of men and
- held by half a dozen; in fact, the courage of these hordes of
- Moslem savages was only equal to butchering women and children
- and unarmed men. I saw a Greek house which was held for eight
- hours by one Armenian with a shotgun against hundreds of Turks
- firing from the surrounding houses and the minaret of a mosque.
- At last his cartridges gave-out, but not for two hours after
- that did the mob pluck up courage to rush the house.”--Extracts
- from accounts by Mr. J. L. C. Booth, special correspondent of
- the London “Graphic.”
-
- * * * * *
-
- “Kessab was a thrifty Armenian town of about eight thousand
- inhabitants, situated on the landward slope of Mt. Cassius
- (Arabic, Jebel Akra) which stands out prominently upon the
- Mediterranean seacoast half-way between Alexandretta and
- Latakia. Kessab is now a mass of blackened ruins, the stark
- walls of the churches and houses rising up out of the ashes
- and charred timbers heaped on every side. What must it mean to
- the five thousand men and women and little children who have
- survived a painful flight to the seacoast and have now returned
- to their mountain home, only to find their houses sacked and
- burned! There were nine Christian villages which clustered
- about Kessab in the valleys below. Several of these have been
- completely destroyed by fire. All have been plundered and the
- helpless people driven out or slain.”
-
- “Can you imagine the feelings of the Kessab people as they
- climbed on foot the long trail up the mountain, and then as
- they came over the ridge into full view of their charred and
- ruined dwellings? Their stores of wheat, barley and rice had
- been burned; clothing, cooking utensils, furniture and tools
- had gone; their goats, cows and mules had been stolen; their
- silk industries stamped out; their beloved churches reduced to
- smouldering heaps. The bodies of their friends and relatives
- who had been killed had not been buried. And yet the love of
- home is so strong that the people have settled down there with
- the determination to clear up the debris and rebuild their
- houses.”--Extracts from “The Sack of Kessab,” Stephen Van R.
- Trowbridge.
-
-As these sheets are going through the press there comes news of famine
-at Zeitoon. The Rev. F. W. Macullum, American Missionary at Marash,
-writes to the Rev. W. W. Peet, American Missionary at Constantinople,
-that 12,000 souls in and around Zeitoon are dying of hunger; they are
-wandering about in rags, mixing bran and water, and cooking and eating
-it, if they can get even that. Rev. Macullum adds, “The same story
-comes to us from all sides. As we foresaw all along, from now on the
-distress will be greatest.”
-
-If 50,000 were massacred, the list of those who have died and are dying
-of homelessness and starvation will exceed 150,000. It is true; and the
-numbers are not exaggerated. Last year the people reaped no harvest,
-and this year there are no sowings.
-
-The latest news is that Mush, a prosperous Armenian village that had
-escaped the desolation of the massacres, has been plundered in a night
-attack by armed Kurds, and the villagers are now reduced to extreme
-distress. Before the outbreak the Armenian patriarchal vicar at Mush
-had repeatedly appealed to the Armenian Patriarch at Constantinople,
-and the Armenian Patriarch had repeatedly appealed to the Authorities
-at Constantinople asking protection for the villagers of Mush as a
-Kurdish attack was apprehended. It is evident that the authorities at
-Constantinople are unable to protect thriving Armenian villages from
-Kurdish and Turkish raiders.
-
-
-
-
-PREFACE TO 2ND PRINTING.
-
-
-The first and second parts of this little book were written and printed
-in pamphlet form for circulation in the United States, shortly after
-the Adana Massacres of April, 1909. I have now thought it advisable to
-add a Supplement of a short history of the Origin of the Armenians and
-the Introduction and Revival of Christianity in Armenia.
-
-The illustrations and the extracts from the periodicals “Harper’s
-Monthly,” “The Wide World” and the “Cosmopolitan” have been added to
-the 2nd printing.
-
-
-
-
-INTRODUCTION TO 2ND PRINTING.
-
-
-My object in writing this little book is to lay the hard case of my
-unfortunate race before the men and women of the United States; since
-it is from the United States that the American Missionaries have gone
-forth, who have been the only helping influence from without for my
-suffering people in Asiatic Turkey. To the earnest and devoted men and
-women of the American Missions, we Armenians owe a debt of gratitude
-which we can never repay.
-
-If in the contents of the pages of this little book I have exaggerated
-Facts by one whit or one iota, if I have deviated by one hair’s breadth
-from the Truth, I stand to be judged.
-
-“God save us from another Adana, but the sword of Islam has not been
-dulled” was one of the clarion notes sounded at the Sixth International
-Convention of the Student Volunteer Movement, which was held at
-Rochester, New York. The man who sounded that clarion note knew Islam,
-and because knowing of my own knowledge that the sword of Islam has not
-been dulled, I tremble lest its sharp edge fall once more on the neck
-of my helpless race. If I knew and felt sure in mine own heart that
-the sword of Islam was dulled, I would be content to let bygones be
-bygones, and to hold my peace and be silent for ever.
-
-Like the sudden explosion of a volcano in the physical world, comes
-the explosion of a Turkish Massacre of Armenians in the moral world.
-It comes just in that way; the subterranean fires are always there,
-but all of a sudden the sulphur flames of religious fanaticism burst,
-the lava floods of race hatred and lust of plunder, break forth and
-run in fiery streams; the unfortunate victims are pounced upon,
-swooped upon, pillaged, plundered, butchered, slaughtered, subjected
-to outrages so hideous, cruel, loathsome, and revolting, that no pen
-could depict their horrible realities and the details can never go
-into print. The human mind is staggered and asks itself the question
-if even the imaginations of fiends and devils could originate such
-horrors. Then this orgy of the human fiends is arrested. For the time
-being the appetite for blood, lust, and plunder is satisfied; for the
-time being, the eye is content with the scenes of havoc and desolation
-lying under the sun; the smell of corpses is in the air, the odor
-from the carcases of the “christian swine” reek in the nostrils of the
-Turk, he turns away, his jaws dripping with blood, and rests to couch
-for a future spring. We have seen that sort of an end to the tragedy
-of a tiger’s victim: the tiger has eaten his fill, he rests, to keep
-guard over the crunched bones and mangled bits of bloody flesh that
-bestrew the earth. So also now there is a residue left of those that
-have served as the meat and wine of this devil’s feast; the demons
-have gorged themselves over the banquet, and now there are left over
-the broken remains of the banquet, the miserable residue homeless and
-destitute.
-
-Civilized nations have received a temporary moral shock, like a shock
-that spreads from the centre of an explosion; the electric vibration
-running far and wide from the scene of the centre of devastation. There
-are among these civilized nations generous and kind-hearted people
-who open their purse strings; they give money to purchase shelter,
-food and clothing for these homeless, naked and hungry beggars, made
-homeless, naked and hungry through no fault of their own. But oh! ye
-generous and kind hearted people! can any power under heaven assuage
-the heart anguish of this miserable residue? Can they be made by any
-means of human comfort to forget the black horrors or recover from
-the effects of the fires of the hideous affliction through which they
-have passed? What is there left for a woman who has seen with her own
-eyes the slaughter and heard with her own ears the dying cry of her
-murdered child? even her reason must give way under the stress of her
-anguish. All ye who are mothers, I appeal to you, for one moment to put
-yourselves in the place of thousands of such mothers, in whose hearts
-the same mother’s love burns as in yours, and then measure the depth of
-their agony.
-
-Generous and kind hearted people who open your purse strings; would
-to God I entreat, ye would raise up your voices and demand that this
-hideous slaughter and oppression of a helpless christian race should
-cease. Would to God I entreat, ye would raise up your voices and demand
-that this people of an industrious, intelligent christian race, robust
-in mind and body, should be let to live. Would to God I entreat, that
-ye would raise up your voices and demand for them that security of life
-and property to which they are entitled just as equally as all other
-peoples.
-
-Public Sentiment has done great things in the world’s history. Public
-Sentiment liberated Greece, The Lebanon, The Balkan States from Turkish
-Oppression. Slavery was abolished in the United States through Public
-Sentiment: but alas! does Public Sentiment sleep for this helpless
-Christian race. Are they not God’s creatures? have they not a right to
-live on God’s earth as other nations? Does Humanity, does Christianity
-allow that tender babes and children should be hideously and horribly
-mutilated and butchered before the eyes of their mothers, or that the
-ears of mothers should be rent with the cries of the dying agony of
-their murdered children? Does Humanity, does Christianity allow that
-helpless women should be forcibly subjected to the most hideous, the
-most loathsome, the most revolting, and the most cruel outrages? Does
-Humanity, does Christianity, allow all this?
-
-Christian Governments have organized a Hague Conference of Peace and
-Civilization, but they have closed its doors to the cause of a bleeding
-christian race groaning under the yoke of the cruellest oppressors that
-the world has yet known. Christian men and women have held up their
-hands in horror at the Indian Juggernauth; but alas! the political
-wheels of Christian Governments have been a Greater Juggernauth for a
-helpless christian race. It is by Christian Governments that “we are
-made as the filth of the world, and as the offscouring of all things
-unto this day.” It is as if the answer to our groanings had been made
-by Christian Governments in just these words:
-
-“We know that you have had frightful grievances, such as have been
-beyond the measure of human endurance. We know that since the Treaty
-of Berlin your history has been written in blood and tears, as the
-history of no other nation has been written before or now. We know that
-your women are subjected to the most revolting and hideous agonies,
-and your babes and children hounded to hideous deaths. We know that
-the sum total of your wrongs and sufferings is so great, that the cry
-of its anguish is piercing the very heavens, but really, our political
-and commercial jealousies prevent; and we each one of us being on the
-look out lest our separate political and commercial interests in the
-Empire of your oppressors be endangered, cannot regard you. It may be
-the deadliest scandal of Christendom that we Christian Powers should
-be all gathered together, one against another, in the Empire of your
-Oppressors, as eagles gather together round a carcase; but really
-there is no help for it; and if you must die hideously by a hellish
-extermination, why then you must die, and we have to condone your
-hellish extermination, for in any case, each one of us must secure his
-own political and commercial interests in this same Empire of your
-Oppressors.”
-
-In “Transcaucasia and Ararat,” published by Mr. James Bryce in 1876,
-there occurs in the chapter entitled “Some Political Reflections” the
-following passage:
-
-“The attention of the West was so much drawn towards Herzegovina
-and Bulgaria by the events of 1876 that the miseries of the Asiatic
-subjects of the Porte have been unreasonably forgotten or neglected.
-They are fully as wretched as the Slavs or Cretans have been; and in
-so far worse off, that in Europe there exists no large body of tribes
-making murder and robbery its regular and daily occupation as the
-Kurds, and latterly the Circassians also, have done in Armenia. If
-anyone will take the trouble to read the complaints of oppressions and
-cruelties presented to the Porte by the Armenian Patriarchate in 1872
-(since reprinted in England) and some of the more recent statements
-printed by the Armenians in England on the same topic, he will see that
-the state of Turkish Asia presents as grave and pressing a problem as
-that of Bulgaria itself.”
-
-In the 4th edition of the same book, published in 1896, the following
-note appears to the passage I have quoted:
-
-“Shortly after this was written, the Blue Books presented to
-Parliament, containing reports from British Consuls in Asiatic Turkey,
-showed that things were really far worse there than they had been in
-Bulgaria or Herzegovina.”
-
-What has followed since 1876 is too well known. For seeking redress
-from their frightful grievances the Armenians were hunted like wild
-beasts and killed like rats and flies during the Hamidian régime.
-
-You will tell me, my christian friends, that with the rise of the
-reform party in Turkey, the era of massacres is at an end, and I
-will tell you that the conditions of 1876 and 1896 have not actually
-changed, though they may seemingly appear so to the uninformed and
-uninitiated. I will answer you that the hideous massacres of April
-last happened nine months after the reform party first rose in power,
-and nine months after the inauguration of the Constitution. I do not
-question the goodwill of the reform party, but the reform party does
-not comprise the whole Turkish nation, and until the Turk learns to
-become liberal, civilized and human, there may be no more Armenians
-left, unless some Christian Power such as the United States demands
-their protection and enforces it. No! my Christian friends, it can be
-well for other Christians in the Turkish Empire with their powerful
-Governments at their back; but alas! there is no security for a subject
-people alien in race and religion.
-
-The massacres in April last raged from Adana to Alexandretta, and
-according to authenticated reports about fifty thousand men, women
-and children were hideously exterminated; more than this, the last
-massacres were especially characterized by the most hideous, the most
-loathsome, the most revolting and ferocious cruelties perpetrated
-on women and children. Now what other name can we find for the
-perpetrators of this diabolical orgy, except to call them fiends
-incarnate; and who is the bold man who can guarantee that these same
-fiends incarnate have become metamorphosed and changed all of a sudden;
-or that the handful of liberal Turks at Constantinople are capable
-of controlling and restraining them. We have not even heard that the
-leaders and participators of the last massacres have been punished as
-they deserved; and what is the reason they are left unpunished? because
-the Government is afraid to punish Mahommedans for killing Christians;
-because the liberal Turks dare not punish the “true believers” for
-killing “Kaffirs.”
-
-The religion of Mahommed, the religion of the sword, has been infused
-into the Turk, and to understand the effect of the religion of Mahommed
-upon the Turk, it is necessary to regard it from four aspects, or from
-four points of analysis. First, the fundamental doctrine and law of the
-religion. Second, the character of the founder as an example to his
-followers. Third, the racial and ethnographic characteristics of the
-Turk. Fourth, the effect which this particular religion would be likely
-to have on this particular race. When we have viewed the Turk and his
-government from these four points of analysis, we have the explanation
-of all the woe and desolation which have lain over the countries under
-Turkish rule.
-
-“When ye encounter the unbelievers strike off their heads until you
-have made a great slaughter of them” is a chapter of the Koran which
-the Turk has religiously and steadfastly made his creed.
-
-In conclusion, I will ask my readers to compare one point of difference
-between the two races, the oppressor and the oppressed. Thousands upon
-thousands of Armenian women, thousands upon thousands of Armenian
-children, have been hounded to death, or savagely, ferociously,
-horribly and loathsomely maltreated by the Turk, and yet in all the
-agonizing years when Massacre has succeeded upon Massacre, has there
-been one known case or one single instance of a Turkish woman or child
-maltreated by Armenians?
-
-The last massacres though especially organized from the Palace at
-Constantinople, were officially announced to originate from an affray
-between one Armenian and three Turks, in which the single handed one,
-on the one side, grappling with the three on the other, killed one of
-the three: given equal numbers and arms, the Armenian is always a match
-for the Turk, but alas for him that unequal numbers and want of arms
-have always made him the victim of his oppressor.
-
-Ahmed Riza Bey in the first part (Ses Causes) of his book “La Crise de
-L’Orient” published in Paris in 1907 holds a brief for his nation which
-through its own fallacious arguments falls to the ground. I will quote
-one passage as an example.
-
-“Jamais les populations chrétiennes ne se sont révoltées, spontanément,
-d’elles-mêmes. Les révoltes ont toujours été partielles et espacées,
-ce qui tend bien à prouver qu’elles sont provoquées non par certains
-injustices administratives que nous savons être constantes et les mêmes
-pour tous, mais par les sourdes menées de l’extérieur. Les agences
-consulaires, les écoles étrangères, les maisons des missionnaires,
-couvertes par les Capitulations, ont servi de foyer de propagande,
-de dépôts d’armes, et même de refuge pour les perturbateurs. Souvent
-les ambassadeurs sont intervenus pour faire gracier des rebelles pris
-et condamnés. On se rappelle avec quelle solennité les Arméniens qui
-s’étaient introduits dans la Banque Ottomane furent conduits sains et
-saufs à bord d’un bateau par le drogman de l’Ambassade russe--leur
-complice.
-
-“Si ces prétendus patriotards sont tant soutenus et choyés dans le
-monde occidental, c’est parce qu’ils constituent un élément ou plutôt
-un instrument de destruction au service de certains Européens élevés
-dans les préjugés des Croissades et qui crient avec Chateaubriand:
-(‘L’espèce humaine ne peut que gagner à la destruction de l’Empire
-Ottoman’).”
-
-The author of “La Crise de L’Orient” continues in this strain. Are we
-then to suppose that the British Consuls, men whose truthfulness has
-never been impeached, whose reports on the unsupportable sufferings
-of the subject christian races and the oppressions and hideous
-atrocities of the Turks, have filled volumes: and likewise the American
-Missionaries, men who have deservedly gained the honor and respect of
-the world, whose statements have corroborated the British Consular
-reports; have been according to Ahmed Riza Bey the mischief-makers
-in the Turkish Empire? since it is from them alone the world has
-gained the widest and most correct knowledge of the daily miseries
-and oppressions under which the subject Christian races have groaned.
-Are we also to suppose that men like Mr. James Bryce and Dr. Dillon
-have by mendacious writings upheld them, British Consul and American
-Missionary, liars, and mischief makers? Or rather are we not to suppose
-that if thinking men and women in the world have come to cry out with
-Chateaubriand “L’espèce humaine ne peut que gagner à la destruction
-de l’Empire Ottoman” it is because the Turks have earned the world’s
-condemnation through their own diabolical acts, and on account of the
-woe and desolation which Turkish rule has worked over the fairest
-provinces under the sun. If the Turk will turn from the evil of his
-ways unto good, the stigma of “the unspeakable Turk” which now attaches
-itself to him, will cease to be a veritable truth. The bringing about
-of the transformation rests with himself.
-
-Further in answer to Ahmed Riza Bey’s account of the Armenian
-“prétendus patriotards” in connection with the Ottoman Bank; I cannot
-do better than quote from Mr. Bryce’s version of the story, and the
-massacre that followed: “In the following June serious trouble arose
-at Van, where some sort of insurrection is said to have been planned,
-though in the discrepancy of the accounts it is hard to arrive at
-the truth. Masses of Kurds came down threatening to massacre the
-Christians, and a conflict in which many innocent persons perished, was
-with difficulty brought to an end by the intervention of the British
-Consul. A little later the Armenian revolutionary party, emboldened
-by the rising in Crete, where the Christians, being well armed and
-outnumbering the Muslims, held their ground successfully, issued
-appeals to the Embassies and to the Turkish Government to introduce
-reforms, threatening disturbances if the policy of repression and
-massacre was persisted in. These threats were repeated in August,
-and ultimately, on August 26, a band of about twenty Armenians,
-belonging the revolutionary party, made a sudden attack on the Imperial
-Ottoman Bank in Constantinople, declaring they were prepared to
-hold it and blow it up should the Sultan refuse their demand. They
-captured the building by a _coup de main_, but were persuaded by the
-Russian dragoman to withdraw upon a promise of safety. Meanwhile the
-Government, who through their spies knew of the project, had organised
-and armed a large mob of Kurds and Lazes--many of whom had recently
-been brought to the city--together with the lowest Turkish class.
-Using the occasion, they launched this mob upon the peaceful Armenian
-population. The onslaught began in various parts of the city so soon
-after the attack on the Bank that it had obviously been prearranged,
-and the precaution had been taken to employ the Turkish ruffians in
-different quarters from those in which they dwelt; so that they might
-less easily be recognised. Carts had moreover been prepared in which
-to carry off the dead. For two days an indiscriminate slaughter went
-on, in which not only Armenian merchants and traders of the cultivated
-class, not only the industrious and peaceable Armenians of the humbler
-class, clerks, domestic servants, porters employed on the quays and
-in the warehouses, but also women and children were butchered in the
-streets and hunted down all through the suburbs. On the afternoon of
-the 27th the British Chargé d’Affaires (whose action throughout won
-general approval) told the Sultan he would land British sailors, and
-the Ambassadors telegraphed to the Sultan. Then the general massacre
-was stopped, though sporadic slaughter went on round the city during
-the next few days. The Ambassadors, who did not hesitate to declare
-that the massacre had been organised by the Government, estimated the
-number of killed at from 6000 to 7000; the official report made to
-the Sultan is said to have put it at 8750.[1] During the whole time
-the army and the police had perfect control of the city--the police,
-and a certain number of the military officers and some high civil
-officials, joining in the slaughter. Of all the frightful scenes
-which Constantinople, a city of carnage, has seen since the great
-insurrection of A.D. 527 when 30,000 people perished in the hippodrome
-there has been none more horrible than this. For this was not the
-suppression of an insurrection in which contending factions fought. It
-was not the natural sequel to a capture by storm, as when the city was
-taken and sacked by the Crusaders in A.D. 1204, and by the Turks in
-A.D. 1453. It was slaughter in cold blood, when innocent men and women,
-going about their usual avocations in a time of apparent peace, were
-suddenly beaten to death with clubs, or hacked to pieces with knives,
-by ruffians who fell upon them in the streets before they could fly to
-any place of refuge.”[2]
-
-I am also obliged to quote from an Article written by a Turkish Officer
-who signs himself A. J. and published in the “Siper-i-Saïka-i-Hurriet,”
-a Turkish daily, on July 6, 1909.
-
- Every time that I hear the name Armenian I feel the bleeding of
- a moral wound within me. It was the year I was sent into exile
- (1896). On a Thursday, before we had left the Military School
- for our vacation, a rumor flew through the school,--“They are
- massacring the Armenians.” All my young patriotic companions
- turned pale from deep emotion. Every one tried to read in the
- sad faces of others the reason for this bad news. But each
- one avoided expressing his thought. After a time the details
- began to circulate to the effect that the Armenians had dared
- to destroy the Ottoman Bank and government buildings with
- bombs, and that this was the reason why they were massacred.
- At that time all of us trembled, because we also were enemies
- of that government, because we also wished to overthrow it,
- and although we were not convinced that the best service could
- be rendered by bombs, we were working quietly to spread our
- ideas. In our hearts a flame of enmity and indignation, no
- less terrible than bombs, was burning. The poor Armenians
- were being massacred ruthlessly, because out of their number
- five or ten persons, resenting their wrongs, had rebelled.
- But that which maddened these poor men, that drove them to
- rebellion and placed bombs in their hands was the stupidity of
- the people and the outrageous oppressions of the government.
- And now this inhuman government was killing with clubs a
- noble nation, under the pretext of putting down a rebellion
- produced by its own oppressions. Among the crimes committed
- by the former government the most unpardonable crime was the
- Armenian massacre. If there was a race up to that time among
- non-Moslem peoples which with sincere and deep feeling honored
- the Ottoman fatherland that race was the Armenian. It is the
- Armenians who wear most nearly the national dress, who speak
- and write Turkish best, and recognize the Ottoman country as
- their fatherland. Besides this it is the Armenians who engage
- in commerce and agriculture, and thus, by demonstrating its
- fruitfulness, increase the value of the Ottoman Empire. Because
- a few among them justly started an agitation, these our noble
- and industrious brethren were being massacred. What a terrible
- scene! When we left the school building we saw hundreds of the
- bodies of our Armenian compatriots being removed in manure
- carts; legs and arms were hanging down outside. This bloody
- scene will ever remain impressed on my mind.
-
- “This shocking crime of Yildiz formed a deep lake of blood,
- and this lake, during the whole course of a cursed absolutism,
- up to the last moment, grew wider. Even during the past
- nine months of the Constitution, in spite of the brotherly
- feelings which had been shown, the awful events in Adana took
- place and the souls of all true Osmanlis melted into tears.
- Up to the present time the deep sorrow caused by this event
- has not disappeared, because this bloody wound in our social
- body cannot easily be cured. While we fill our stomachs with
- choice morsels, while we rest selfishly in our comfortable
- beds, these fatherless and brotherless orphans, widows hungry,
- naked, and barefoot wander hither and thither, and thousands
- of families are fleeing from the fatherland. We are convinced
- that the government is doing its work, but what has happened
- is so great a calamity that it can keep a government busy for
- years. However much sacrifice we may make, still it will be
- inadequate, because the happiness of the fatherland depends on
- healing such blood wounds as these as soon as possible. We are
- convinced that the government and all connected with it are
- persuaded of this as well as ourselves. We must now wipe out
- the traces of the misfortune brought by a cursed period. We
- must now comfort weeping hearts. We must understand and teach
- those who do not understand that patriotism and brotherhood
- do not differ from each other. The responsibility of the
- government for the Armenians is very great and very weighty.
- The whole Ottoman nation is under obligations to protect this
- suffering race, because the liberty we enjoy to-day is in large
- part due to the blood shed by the Armenians. We thought that
- these truths were so obvious that we preferred to keep silence,
- whereas to-day we understand that it is necessary from time to
- time to recall the greatness of our obligation. We must not
- forget that this unhappy people up to yesterday has endured
- only barbarism, and for twelve years has been constantly
- oppressed and ground to the earth, and has given thousands of
- victims. Hereafter we must work to assure them that the era
- of massacres has passed, and with all our strength of mind
- and soul we must quiet them. The obligation of the government
- to protect them is also very heavy, because our Armenian
- countrymen live among wandering tribes. We must all assist the
- government and point out its obligation. It must be declared
- in public and periodically that the one of the most important
- duties of the Ottoman nation is to protect, together with those
- of other races, the interests, the life, and property of the
- Armenians as well, since these are their sacred rights. Let
- investigations be made and let whatever is necessary be done in
- order to reach this aim.”
-
-This article of the Turkish officer, who however does not dare
-disclose his identity; and the account given by an authority like
-Mr. James Bryce surely refute the facile explanation of Ahmed Riza
-Bey in alluding to the Massacres as “les Massacres occasionnés par
-les aventuriers Arméniens.” Indeed it holds out poor hope for the
-furtherance of liberty and justice in Turkey when the man who is the
-President of the Chamber of Deputies only as far back as 1907 tries to
-palliate the horrors of the Hamidian régime by misrepresentations.
-
-The author of “La Crise de l’Orient” also cites the Japanese as
-an instance of the civilization and aptitude for progress of a
-non-Christian oriental race. In this case, Ahmed Riza Bey certainly
-needs to measure the distance between the mental, moral and humane
-qualities of the Japanese and the Turk, a distance as great as lies
-geographically between the North Pole and the South.
-
-
-
-
-PART I.
-
-
-
-
-THE ARMENIAN MASSACRES AND THE TREATY OF BERLIN.
-
-
-Since the gathering of the Plenipotentiaries of Europe at the famous
-Congress of Berlin in 1878, and the signing of the still more famous
-Treaty of Berlin, the martyr roll of the unfortunate Armenian nation
-stands without its parallel in history.
-
-In the Guildhall at Berlin hangs a picture of the memorable scene
-witnessed in that city on July the thirteenth 1878. The painter has
-depicted the proud array of representatives of the powerful Governments
-of Europe, but in the interests of Humanity there should be attached to
-that painting the wording of Article 61 of the Treaty of Berlin written
-in letters of blood (Armenian blood).
-
-It was a curious irony of Fate, that although the taking of “the
-terrible stronghold of Kars,” universally admitted to be one of the
-greatest and most difficult military exploits ever achieved, and the
-crowning success of the Russian arms in Asiatic Turkey, should have
-been accomplished by an Armenian General; that although Armenian
-Generals in the Russian service had led to conquest, and Armenian
-soldiers fought, conquered and died, yet by these successes not only
-was no amelioration attained of the hard fate of their unhappy nation
-under Turkish rule, but that fate, hard before, was made a hundredfold
-and even a thousandfold harder.
-
-[Illustration: GENERAL PRINCE LORIS MELIKOFF.
-
-Commanded the Russian forces in Asiatic Turkey during the Russo-Turkish
-war and captured the impregnable fortress of Kars. Appointed Prime
-Minister of Russia by Alexander II. The liberal policy which
-characterized the reign of that excellent monarch, and the Constitution
-that he was on the eve of granting to his people were influenced by
-Melikoff; but after the death of Alexander II he was not allowed to
-continue in his good work of reforming Russia, being overthrown from
-office early in the reign of Alexander III.]
-
-The efforts of the Armenians, and the entreaties of their Patriarch
-Nerses had procured the insertion of Article 16 in the Treaty of San
-Stefano signed between Russia and Turkey in March 1878. In fact the
-wording of the Article had been suggested by the Patriarch himself.
-It provided the following stipulation for the protection of the
-Armenians:--
-
-“As the evacuation by the Russian troops of the territory which they
-now occupy in Armenia, and which is to be restored to Turkey, might
-give rise to conflicts and complications detrimental to the maintenance
-of good relations between the two countries, the Sublime Porte engages
-to carry into effect without further delay the improvements and
-reforms demanded by local requirements in the provinces inhabited by
-the Armenians, and to guarantee their security against the Kurds and
-Circassians.”
-
-What followed has passed into history. The British Government of which
-Lord Beaconsfield (then Mr. D’Israeli) was Premier, and Lord Salisbury
-Foreign Secretary, once more pursued the old policy of baffling Russian
-aggrandizement in Turkey. Afraid that her own real or fancied interests
-would thereby become imperilled, England threw in the weight of her
-power, and virtually commanded the substitution of the Treaty of Berlin
-in lieu of the Treaty of San Stefano. Thus the substantial guarantee of
-a natural and immediate protector, both able and desirous of enforcing
-the protection which the Armenians then had in Russia, was taken away,
-and the security of impotent words given in its stead, namely:--
-
-“The Sublime Porte undertakes to carry out without further delay
-the improvements and reforms demanded by local requirements in the
-provinces inhabited by the Armenians, and to guarantee their security
-against the Circassians and Kurds. It will periodically make known the
-steps taken to this effect to the Powers, who will superintend their
-application.”
-
-“_It will periodically make known the steps taken to this effect to the
-Powers, who will superintend their application._” How this last proviso
-could furnish food for laughter were it not for the terrible tragedy
-involved in it.
-
-The insertion of Article 61 in the Treaty of Berlin, granted, or rather
-seemingly granted, by the six Powers of Europe, proved in reality, as
-subsequent events bore out, an instrument of death and torture. It was
-as if the reversal of the figures had reversed the possibilities of
-succour and protection, and with the death of the Czar Liberator, the
-last chance of the Armenians died.
-
-The Turkish Massacres of 1875 and 1876 which led up to the
-Russo-Turkish War of 1877 are historical facts too well known to need
-further comment in this article. The Czar Liberator stands out in
-history as that noble figure--a benefactor of mankind. Through his
-humanitarian susceptibilities, and his sublime efforts for their
-deliverance, the Christians of European Turkey received immunity
-from Turkish slaughter; and the protection of his benevolent arm was
-extended over that unhappy Christian nation of Asiatic Turkey, the
-Armenians; at least it would have secured them immunity from the
-record-breaking slaughter that followed, but the Power that had stood
-behind Turkey since 1791 frustrated his endeavours.
-
-A British commentator on that page of British policy has summed it up
-in the words:--
-
-“In no other part of the world has our national policy or conduct been
-determined by motives so immoral and so stupid.”[3]
-
-The same commentator, in reviewing also the result of the substituted
-Treaty, fittingly remarks:--
-
-“The Turk could see at a glance that, whilst it relieved him of the
-dangerous pressure of Russia, it substituted no other pressure which
-his own infinite dexterity in delays could not make abortive. As for
-the unfortunate Armenians, the change was simply one which must tend
-to expose them to the increased enmity of their tyrants, whilst it
-damaged and discouraged the only protection which was possible under
-the inexorable conditions of the physical geography of the country.”
-
-It had been the constant endeavour of the Patriarch Nerses to point out
-to the Armenians that their true policy lay in aiding Russian advance
-in Turkey: that even if Russia were selfish in her designs, she was
-the only Christian Power that would stand as their protector against
-Turkish or Persian tyranny. His political foresight had already been
-verified as early as 1827,[4] and his strenuous life-long labours were
-nearing the goal in 1878, but were frustrated by the fatal action that
-intervened.
-
-England, by commanding the substitution of the Treaty of Berlin in
-place of that of San Stefano had taken upon herself the heaviest
-obligations any nation could incur. It is unnecessary to repeat that
-those obligations were never fulfilled.
-
-If the lamented death of the Emperor Alexander II was one of the most
-unhappy events that could have befallen Russia; it was a hundredfold
-more unhappy for the Armenian nation. His successor, who adopted
-repressive and coercive measures for his own people in the place of
-his father’s liberal policy, not only applied the same measures to his
-Armenian subjects in his own domains, but left their countrymen under
-Turkish rule to their merciless fate.
-
-Russia, twice foiled in her subjugation of Turkey, changed her policy
-from that of crushing into that of upholding the Ottoman Empire. When
-the horrors of the Armenian massacres, revealed to the people of
-England by their own ambassadors and consuls, their own journalists
-and men of letters, thrilled the hearts of men and women, when
-England’s “Grand Old Man” thundered his vituperations against the
-“Great Assassin,”[5] Prince Lobanoff in answer to British proposals of
-coercion towards Turkey, conveyed Russia’s intentions in his warning
-note to the Salisbury Government, and England, who in 1878 had rivetted
-the Turkish yoke on the necks of the Armenians, to use the words of
-an eminent British authority on Turkish affairs, “wrung her hands and
-submitted.”[6]
-
-The same authority tells us that the _coup de grace_ to the
-intervention of the Concert of Europe in Armenian affairs was given by
-Prince Bismarck, “who in 1883 intimated to the British Government, in
-terms of cynical frankness and force, that Germany cared nothing about
-the matter, and that it had better be allowed to drop.”
-
-Thus the Concert of Europe, under whose aegis the aspiring Armenians
-foolishly and fondly hoped to recover National Autonomy, became the
-cause of dealing out to the struggling nation, not security from
-Turkish oppression, but instead fire, famine and slaughter, a slaughter
-to which were added devilish ingenuity of torture, and the loathsome
-horrors of Turkish prisons. If before the Treaty of Berlin the
-Armenians had suffered from various phases of Turkish oppression, they
-had at least not been pursued with the relentless fury that followed,
-until the soil of the fatherland was soaked, and reeked and steamed
-with the life-blood of its slaughtered sons and daughters; until
-women and children were done to their death under the most hideous and
-revolting circumstances, and tender youths and cultured men of letters
-rotted in Turkish dungeons.
-
-England, with her uneasy conscience, continued spasmodic efforts in the
-shape of paper remonstrances, from time to time she rallied the other
-powers who were signatories to the Treaty of Berlin and by means of
-Ambassadorial Identical Notes and Collective Notes sought to terminate
-the horrors that were stirring public feeling at home; but Abdul Hamid,
-fully cognizant of the jealousies and rivalries of the Powers, and
-knowing himself secure thereby, laughed in his sleeve at all the paper
-remonstrances.
-
-No action was taken by the Cabinets of Europe to leash the tiger
-sitting on the Ottoman throne. The lust of blood and the lust
-of plunder of “le Sultan Rouge,” combined with the greed of his
-satellites, were allowed to be gratified to the full on a helpless and
-hapless people, whilst Europe looked on.
-
-The character of Abdul Hamid has been well summed up in the testimony
-of a writer having opportunities of intimate acquaintance with him.
-
-“Il voit dans son peuple un vil troupeau qu’il peut dévorer sans pitié,
-et à qui, comme le lion de la Fable, il fait beaucoup d’honneur en
-daignant le croquer.”[7]
-
-When to these significant words, we add the following by the same
-author:--
-
-“De ce qu’Abdul Hamid n’est pas bon musulman, il ne faudrait pas
-conclure qu’il aime les Chrétiens; il les déteste, au contraire, et
-emploie fréquemment le mot _giaour_ pour désigner un infidèle ou
-insulter un musulman.”
-
-We have the explanation of the Armenian massacres; especially as that
-unfortunate people had become by Article 61 of the Treaty of Berlin,
-subjects of the paper remonstrances of the Powers of Europe, and
-thereby also objects of the tyrant’s vengeance.
-
-[Illustration: GENERAL TER GOUKASSOFF.
-
-Relieved the beleaguered Russian garrison at Bayazid during the
-Russo-Turkish war of 1877, captured the fortress; and otherwise
-distinguished himself during the war.
-
-The other Armenian General who distinguished himself during the
-Russo-Turkish war was General Lazaroff.]
-
-That the Armenians should be constantly appealing to the Power that
-had pledged itself for their protection, and that the same Power
-should be constantly rallying the others, and making Ambassadorial
-demonstrations, was enough to rouse the vilest passions of a nature in
-which no feelings except vile passions existed.
-
-Of all sins in this world, perhaps the sin of foolishness receives the
-severest punishment, and of all crimes, the crime of failure meets
-with the heaviest doom. For their foolishness in trusting in European
-protection and hoping for European intervention the unfortunate
-Armenians paid with rivers of their own blood, and for their crime of
-failure they were made to wallow in that blood. The darkest pages of
-their history have been written in the closing years of the nineteenth,
-and the early years of the twentieth century; never since the loss of
-their independence, nine centuries ago, had they hoped for so much, and
-never had they paid so dearly for their folly.
-
-If they had carefully laid to heart the whole history of Europe’s
-intercourse with Asia, beginning with the conquests of the Macedonian
-Alexander, they would have read in the light of sober judgement,
-self-interest, and self-interest only written on every line and
-page, but they committed the folly of hoping that for their sakes
-the history of the world, which means in other words the history of
-human selfishness, was going to be reversed; and they forgot what was
-more important than all, that Europe had nothing to gain by their
-emancipation. There is only one explanation for their folly. It is a
-peculiarity of human nature that the troubles we have been bearing
-with more or less patience, become unbearable when once hopes of
-deliverance from them are awakened. Article 61 of the Treaty of Berlin
-awakened hopes that proved bitterer in the eating than Dead Sea fruit.
-It aroused towards the Armenians the diabolical animosity of the human
-fiend who held sovereignty over them.
-
-Hunted like wild beasts, killed like rats and flies, out of the depths
-of its agony and its martyrdom, the nation has still contrived to rear
-its head and live; for it was as it is now, the industrious, energetic,
-self-respecting element in the Turkish Empire, with a virile life in
-its loins and sinews, that centuries of oppression culminating in
-the unspeakable horrors of a thirty years’ martyrdom has failed to
-exterminate.
-
-As for the Treaty of Berlin--It has done its work.
-
-
-
-
-THE ARMENIAN MASSACRES AND THE TURKISH CONSTITUTION.
-
-
-The Turkish Constitution came with a bound that shook the equanimity of
-Europe. To the anxious and jealously watching eyes of Europe the “sick
-man in her midst” was at last becoming moribund. His recovery was as
-startling as unexpected. Europe had not correctly gauged the latent
-forces within the Turkish Empire, neither had she correctly estimated
-the far-reaching astuteness of the tyrant on the throne.
-
-Assailed by enemies from without and within, feeling the foundation
-of his throne crumbling, Abdul Hamid, arch murderer and assassin,
-performed his own _auto da fé_, and rose from his ashes a
-constitutional sovereign. The obduracy of the merciless tyrant melted
-like wax before the approach of personal danger, and the act was
-necessary to save himself.
-
-Hopes rose high at such a magnificent _coup d’état_ of the
-revolutionaries. Young Turks and Armenians fell on each other’s necks,
-embraced, and mingled their tears of joy together. Leaders of the
-Turkish Constitution proclaimed in public speeches that the Turks
-owed the deepest debt of gratitude to the Armenians who had been the
-initiators of their struggle for Freedom, and in the Armenian graveyard
-at Constantinople Turks held a memorial service and kissed the graves
-of the Armenian dead, whom they called “the martyrs whose blood had
-been shed for Turkish freedom.”
-
-At the banquet given by Abdul Hamid to the Delegates of the Turkish
-Parliament, the Armenian Delegates alone refused to attend, declining
-to be the guest of the man responsible for the murder of hundreds of
-thousands of their countrymen.
-
-The Armenian revolutionaries had stood behind the Young Turk party and
-joined hands with them; already the nation at large imagined itself
-breathing the air of Freedom, and already in anticipation drank in deep
-draughts of the air of Liberty.
-
-The awakening came all too quickly. In spite of the Constitution the
-machinations of Abdul Hamid and his palace clique could find fruitful
-ground among a fanatical populace to whom the Padishah was not only the
-Lord’s anointed but the Lord’s appointed, the delegate of the Prophet
-on whom his sacred mantle had fallen; added to this the incentive of
-pecuniary rewards to a brutal soldiery and the lust of plunder, and
-once more the horrors of massacres were let loose on the Armenians.
-There followed sacked and burning villages, plundered and devastated
-homes, an unarmed population put to the sword, and as in every case,
-cruelties of the most hideous and ferocious nature perpetrated on women
-and children.
-
-In the whole long story of the massacres, courage to face their
-oppressors has never been found wanting on the part of the Armenians.
-It is on record that the women of a whole mountain village surprised by
-Turkish soldiers, in the absence of the men, fought and resisted to the
-last gasp, and finally, to escape the clutches of the brutal soldiery,
-committed suicide with their children by precipitating themselves from
-their mountain cliffs. A nation which could produce such women, and
-which has had the simple courage to die for its faith, as no Christian
-people has died before, is not wanting in brave men, but no amount of
-bravery and heroism can save an unarmed population from being mowed
-down by soldiery equipped with modern instruments of carnage and
-slaughter.
-
-The horrors of Adana coming on the heels of a Constitution they had
-aided, and from which they had hoped so much, presages grave fears for
-the Armenians.
-
-No one doubts that a great forward movement is reaching its culminating
-point in the destiny of Asia. The West has learnt its all of religion
-(the moral and guiding principle of mankind) from the East, and now
-the East would fain learn the law of restraint and the law of freedom
-(the protecting principles of mankind) from the West. Inspired by
-this feeling the liberal Turks decidedly mean well, and they are
-animated with a sincere desire to ensure peace and security of life
-and property for the heterogeneous peoples under the Turkish sway, but
-they themselves have had to contend and still have to contend with a
-fanatical populace.
-
-To the Mahommedan world at large the Caliph of Islam is the envoy of
-God, the sacredness of whose person must be inviolate. Abdul Hamid, the
-astute politician, knew that the security of his sovereignty depended
-on his Caliphal rights, and his main policy during the long period of
-his execrable reign had been directed towards preserving and asserting
-the same; thus we can see how his dethronement, which the liberal Turks
-would gladly have accomplished simultaneously with the inauguration of
-the Constitution, had to be deferred to a later period, and how it was
-necessary for the Sheik ul Islam to pronounce the Caliph a traitor to
-his sacred trust, a violator of the holy law of the Prophet, before his
-dethronement could be dared or accomplished.
-
-The Christian Armenians in Turkey live in the midst of the followers of
-a hostile religion, with no power or force behind them which makes for
-protection. Who does not know that the great numerical preponderance
-of Hinduism keeps the balance of power in India, and restrains bloody
-religious hostilities; and when we review the whole religious history
-of Christian Europe, and that terribly long roll of crimes committed in
-the name of Him who expounded His religion with the parable of the Good
-Samaritan, and the precept of loving one’s neighbour as one’s self,
-we cannot feel surprise at the fanatical outbursts of the followers
-of Mahommed, the founder of a religion whose doctrines certainly
-fall short of the humane principles inculcated by the Founder of
-Christianity. If authentic historical facts prove to us that horrible
-and atrocious cruelties have been perpetrated by Christian nations,
-not only on other religionists, but on fellow Christians of different
-denominations, how then can we expect better things from the Turk
-unless some power or force restrain him?
-
-Christianity has now partly emancipated herself from the ferocities
-which darkened and poured the red stream of blood on her white banner:
-but to the Mahommedan world at large, religion is still the powder
-magazine which a spark can ignite.
-
-“Better the Czar than the Sultan, but better any form of national
-autonomy than either Czar or Sultan” has been the principle which has
-animated the Armenians, and the goal towards which they have been
-striving for thirty years.
-
-National Autonomy has been the dream of the Armenians in Turkey, but it
-is well to consider if such a dream has any possibility of realization.
-Bulgaria declared her independence, and Austria annexed Bosnia and
-Herzegovina, but these reductions of Turkish power were accomplished
-by the force that stood behind them. Have the Armenians any such force
-which could accomplish their deliverance? Have they an organized army
-at their command? Are they equipped with all the necessary weapons of
-modern warfare? are questions it is well for the nation to ask before
-it makes itself a target for Turkish bullets.
-
-On the other hand is it likely that the Turks will willingly give the
-Armenians independence? To do so would mean that they should themselves
-dismember their own Empire, and when we see Christian Governments
-actuated in their foreign policy by the supremest selfishness;
-Christian Governments striving tooth and nail in their own self
-interest to keep possessions which are lawfully not their own, then
-why in the name of common sense should we expect such extraordinary
-magnanimity, or such super-nobility from the Turk.
-
-Armenia stands in the unhappy position of being divided between Russia
-and Turkey (if we except Persia, which does not count for much since
-1827). It is evident that even the Czar Liberator, if he had been
-allowed to carry out his humanitarian endeavours, would have liberated
-Armenia from Turkey, not to give her independence but to make her into
-a Russian possession, for to have given Turkish Armenia independence
-would have been tantamount to fostering the spirit of independence in
-those provinces of Armenia which had already passed under Russian rule.
-
-It is well known that the Emperor Alexander II was guided and
-influenced by the liberal principles of Loris Melikoff (or properly
-Melikian according to the Armenian termination of his name). Melikian
-enjoyed the personal friendship of the Czar, and the successful victor
-of Kars was rewarded by his august master with the office of Prime
-Minister. The policy of Melikian made for the Russofication of Armenia,
-and while it is not possible that he loved Russia more than he loved
-his own country, it is rather more than probable that he saw in the
-Russofication of his nation the only way of saving its people.
-
-With the death of Alexander II Melikian’s star passed out of the
-horizon of Russian ministership; his liberal principles were not
-acceptable to Alexander III, and the policy of Russia towards the
-Armenians underwent a decided change.
-
-Since the disastrous war with Japan the policy of Russia towards the
-Armenians has undergone another change. In the years preceding the
-war, the reigning autocrat had pursued the policy of his father to an
-even greater degree of repression. Not only had national schools and
-theatres been closed in Russian Armenia and newspapers suspended, but
-the Czar went still further, and confiscated the lands and the wealth
-of the Armenian church.
-
-The late Armenian Catholicos Mukertich Khirimian (one of the delegates
-sent to the Congress of Berlin by the Patriarch Nerses), to whom his
-own people had given the beloved appellation of “Hairik” (little
-father) had by his noble life of self-sacrifice, his unceasing labours
-for the cause of the people, and his remarkable individuality, come
-to be regarded as a sort of holy man. There in the Cathedral of
-Etchmiatzin, under the venerable dome where for seventeen hundred
-years the successors of Gregore Loosavoritch (Gregory the Illuminator)
-had each in his turn held sway, and worshipped on the spot where the
-vision of Christ the Lord had descended, there before the altar of
-Christ, had Hairik the holy man lifted up his voice and cursed--cursed
-the Czar; and cursed Russia--Pious Russia with its pious Czar at its
-head shuddered, and the astounding reverses in the war with Japan that
-followed were attributed to Khirimian’s curse.
-
-Russia in Expiation made Reparation: the ban on schools, theatres and
-newspapers was removed, the church lands and the church wealth were
-restored, and the Czar of all the Russias in a friendly note to the
-Armenian Catholicos assured him of the Imperial friendship, and the
-Imperial solicitude for the welfare of his people.
-
-The return from exile of the Patriarch Ezmerlian to Constantinople,
-was quickly followed by his nomination to the See of Etchmiatzin,
-left vacant by the death of his predecessor, and now we hear of the
-Catholicos appealing to the Russian Government to take over the
-protectorate of Armenia from Turkey. Ezmerlian knows Turkey, he has
-been in close touch with the liberal Turks, and he knows the Turkish
-nation as a whole; he knows also that the present and immediate future
-of Russia is dark in the gloom of autocratic Czardom, and a man of his
-intellectual attainments and liberal principles can have no sympathy
-with absolutism. The appeal therefore of the Catholicos Ezmerlian
-(the Iron Patriarch as he is familiarly known) must be read as a
-premonition, that not only has all hope of wresting national autonomy
-from Turkey died in his resolute heart, but also that he entertains
-grave fears of the possibility of the horrors of Adana being repeated.
-
-[Illustration: MUCKERTICH KHIRIMIAN.
-
-(Late Catholicos and Supreme Patriarch of Etchmiatzin. Author and
-Poet).]
-
-Russia may go on massacring Jews until Russians have left off being
-fanatical devils, and learned to be human, but however much she may
-pursue the policy of suppressing nationalism, however much she may seek
-to absorb the nation into herself, she has stopped at slaughter as far
-as Armenians are concerned. In his appeal to Russia, the Catholicos can
-be actuated by no other motive except the one motive of safe-guarding
-the people, of whom he is the acknowledged head.
-
-A man of high character and a dauntless patriot, known to his people
-under the beloved appellation of “Hairik” (little father). He was one
-of the delegates sent by the Patriarch Nerses to the Congress of Berlin
-in 1878. He worked for the cause of the people during his whole life,
-and died, worn out with heartbreaking disappointments; his dying words
-were, “We must not despair.”
-
-In an article entitled “The Church of Ararat” by Henry W. Nevinson in
-Harper’s Monthly Magazine of April, 1908 there is given the following
-interesting account of the late Catholicos.
-
- The old man was sitting up in bed, a gray rug neatly spread
- over him for counterpane. There was something childlike and
- appealing in his position, as there always is about a sick man
- lying in bed in the daytime. One felt a little brutal standing
- beside him, dressed, and well, and tingling from the cold
- outside. It was a time for soothing hands and motherly care
- to put this baby of fourscore years to rest. But his mother
- was long ago forgotten: even his wife had been dead for half a
- century; and his only nurse was a stalwart black-bearded bishop
- of middle age.
-
- It was a long, low room, pleasant in its austerity. The
- whitewashed walls, the bare floor, the absence of all ornament,
- told of a clean and devoted mind. The windows looked upon a
- courtyard, silent but for the murmur and fluttering of pigeons.
- The old man’s hands lay quiet on the blanket, white, and wasted
- almost to the bone. The nightgown hid a form so thin it hardly
- made a ripple under the clothes. Through the white and shrunken
- face every lineament of the future skull was already visible;
- but on each side of the thin nose, hooked like a round bow, a
- great brown eye revealed the inward spirit’s intelligence and
- zeal unquenched. On his head was a close-fitting cap of purple
- velvet.
-
- Thus, near the end of last December, one of a century’s
- greatest men--Mgrditch Khrimian, Katholikos of the Armenian
- Church, and soul of the Armenian people--slowly approaching
- to death, lay in the ancient monastery called Etchmiatzin,
- or “The Only-Begotten is Descended.” From the window of a
- neighboring room he might have looked across the frost bound
- plain of the Araxes, where the vines were now all cut close and
- buried for the winter. Beyond the plain stood a dark mass of
- whirling snow and hurricane that hid the cone of Ararat. And
- just beyond Ararat lies Lake Van, last puddle of the Deluge.
- On the shore of that lake, eighty-seven years ago, Khrimian
- was born. In 1820 the Turkish Empire was still undiminished by
- sea or land; the Sultan still counted as one of the formidable
- Powers of Europe. It was four years before Byron set out to
- deliver Greece from his tyranny, and established for England a
- reputation as the generous champion of freedom--a reputation
- which still rather pathetically survives throughout the
- Near East. Long and stormy had been the life upon which the
- Katholikos now looked back, but not unhappy, for from first
- to last it had been inspired by one absorbing and unselfish
- aim--the freedom and regeneration of his people. It is true he
- had failed.
-
- From his earliest years, when he had witnessed the terrors of
- Turkish oppression in the homes of Armenians round Ararat, he
- was possessed by the spirit of nationality--such a spirit as
- only kindles in oppressed races, but dies away into easygoing
- tolerance among the prosperous and contented of the world.
- He began as a poet, wandering far and wide through the
- Turkish, Persian, and Russian sections of Armenia, visiting
- Constantinople and Jerusalem, and recalling to his people by
- his poems the scenes and glories of their national history.
- Entering the monastic order after his wife’s death, he devoted
- himself to the building of schools, which he generously threw
- open to Kurds, the hereditary assassins of Armenians. For many
- years, while Europe was occupied with Crimean wars, Austrian
- wars, or French and German wars, we see him ceaselessly
- journeying from Van to Constantinople and through the cities of
- Asia, unyielding in the contest, though continually defeated,
- his schools burned, his printing-presses broken up, his sacred
- emblems of the Host hung in mockery round the necks of dogs.
- When elected Armenian patriarch of Constantinople (1869), he
- was driven from his office after four years.
-
- But the cup of Turkish iniquity was filling. The pitiless
- slaughter of Bulgarians and Armenians alike was more than
- even the European Powers could stand. With varied motives,
- Russia sent her armies to fight their way to the walls of
- Constantinople, and Khrimian found himself summoned to plead
- his people’s cause before the Congress of Berlin. Though he
- speaks no language but Armenian and Turkish, he visited all
- the great courts of Europe beforehand, urging them to create
- an autonomous neutral state for Armenia, as they had done with
- success for the Lebanon. In London he became acquainted with
- Gladstone; but Gladstone was then only the blazing firebrand
- which had kindled the heart of England, and, in the Congress
- itself Khrimian could gain nothing for his people beyond the
- promises of Article 61, pledging the Powers, and especially
- England, to hold the Kurds in check and enforce Turkey’s
- definite reforms. It is needless to say that none of these
- promises and pledges were observed. Beaconsfield returned to
- London amid shouts of “Peace with Honor,” and Armenia was left
- to stew.
-
- So it went on. Detained in Constantinople as prisoner, banished
- to Jerusalem for rebellion, and finally chosen Katholikos, or
- head of his Church and race, by his own people, he maintained
- the hopeless contest. Year by year the woe increased, till by
- the last incalculable crime (1894-1896), the Armenians were
- slaughtered like sheep from the Bosporus to Lake Van, and
- the lowest estimate counted the murdered dead at 100,000.
- Gladstone made the last great speech of his heroic life.
- England attempted some kind of protest. But rather than join
- the Liberal demand for action, Lord Rosebery left his party
- for private leisure, and Russia, France, and Germany combined
- to secure immunity for the “great assassin.” It was the lowest
- point of Europe’s shame.
-
- Blow followed blow. Hardly had the remnant of the Armenian
- people escaped from massacre when their Church fell under the
- brutal domination of Russia. Plehve ordained its destruction,
- and Golitzin was sent to Tiflis as governor-general to carry
- it out. Church property to the value of £6,000,000 was seized
- by violence, the Katholikos resolutely refusing to give up
- the keys of the safe where the title deeds were kept (June,
- 1903). For two years the Russian officials played with the
- revenues, retaining eighty per cent. for their own advantage.
- But in the mean time assassination had rid the earth of
- Plehve, and the overwhelming defeats of Russia in Manchuria
- were attributed to the Armenian curse. Grudgingly the Church
- property was restored, in utter chaos, and for the moment it is
- Russia’s policy to favor the Armenians as a balance against the
- Georgians, whom the St. Petersburg government is now determined
- to destroy.
-
- Such was the past upon which the worn old man, stretched on his
- monastic bed, looked back that winter’s morning. Singleness of
- aim has its reward in spiritual peace, but of the future he
- was not hopeful. He no longer even contemplated an autonomous
- Armenia, either on Turkish territory or on Russian. On the
- Russian side of the frontier the Armenian villages were too
- scattered, too much interspersed with Georgians and Tartars, to
- allow of autonomy. On the Turkish side, he thought, massacre
- and exile had now left too few of the race to form any kind
- of community. Indeed, for the last twelve years the Armenian
- villagers have been crawling over the foot of Ararat by
- thousands a year to escape the Kurds, and every morning they
- come and stand in fresh groups of pink and blue rags outside
- the monastery door where the head of their Church and race
- lies dying. They stand there in mute appeal, as I saw them,
- possessing nothing in the world but the variegated tatters
- that cover them, and their faith in their Katholikos. Slowly
- they are drafted away into Tiflis, Baku, or their Caucasian
- villages, but nowhere are they welcomed.
-
- Some of the bishops and monks, who form a council round their
- chief, still look for Europe’s interference, and trust that the
- solemn pledges taken by England and other Powers at Berlin may
- be fulfilled. The Bishop of Erivan, for instance, still labors
- for the appointment of a Christian governor over the district
- marked by the ill-omened names of Van, Bitlis, and Erzeroum.
- I also found that even among the Georgians there was a large
- party willing to concede all the frontier district from Erivan
- to Kars, where Armenian villages are thickest, as an autonomous
- Armenian province, in the happy day when the Caucasus wins
- federal autonomy. But the majority of the Armenian clergy, who
- hitherto have led the people, are beginning to acquiesce in the
- hopelessness of political change, and are now limiting their
- efforts to education and industries. One cannot yet say how far
- their influence may be surpassed in the growing revolutionary
- parties of “The Bell” and “The Flag.” Of these, the Social
- Democratic “Bell” follows the usual impracticable and pedantic
- creed of St. Marx. The “Flag,” or party of Nationalist
- Democrats, is at present dominant, and at a great assembly
- held in Erivan last August (1906) they adopted a programme
- of land nationalization, universal suffrage and education,
- an eight-hour day, and the control of the Church property by
- elected laymen. If the Russian revolution makes good progress,
- they will naturally unite with the Georgian Federalists, on
- whom the best hopes of the country are set.
-
- Whatever may be the political future of the Armenians, they
- seem likely to survive for many generations yet as a race,
- held together by language and religion. Except the Jews, there
- is, I think, no parallel to such a survival. It is a thousand
- years since they could be called a powerful nation. For almost
- as long they have possessed no independent country of their
- own. For six hundred years their ancient capital city of Ani
- has stood a splendid but empty ruin in the desert between Kars
- and the great mountain of Alagöz, which confronts Ararat, with
- nearly equal height. They have been rent asunder and tormented
- by Persians, Turks, Tartars, and Russians in turn. Even their
- religion is not nationalistic or distinctly separate from other
- forms of religion, like the Jewish. Except for metaphysical
- shades of difference, hardly comprehensible to the modern
- world, there is little to distinguish it from the orthodox
- Christianity of the Near East. Yet, through innumerable
- disasters and attempts at extermination, the race persists,
- like the Jews, with astonishing vitality, unmistakable in
- characteristics which may not be exactly heroic, but lead to a
- certain material success. After all, it is only in harassed and
- persecuted nationalities that true patriotism ever survives.
-
-[Illustration: MATTHEVOSE EZMERLIAN.
-
-Catholicos and Supreme Patriarch of Etchmiatzin. A man of high
-character and great ability, also a distinguished linguist. As
-Patriarch of Constantinople he was familiarly known as the “Iron
-Patriarch.” Banished by the Hamidian Government, he returned from exile
-in 1908 and was shortly after elected Catholicos of Etchmiatzin.
-
-The Armenian Catholicos is not infallible like the Pope. He is elected
-by the nation, but his appointment is subject to the sanction of the
-Czar.]
-
-
-
-
-THE ARMENIAN MASSACRES AND THE ARMENIAN PEOPLE.
-
-
-During a period extending over thirty years the civilized world has
-heard of Turkish Massacres of Armenians. Massacres of a nature so
-ferocious and diabolical, so hideous and revolting, that no pen could
-adequately describe their horrors.
-
-Writing in 1896, Mr. James Bryce, in his supplementary chapter to the
-4th edition of his book “Transcaucasia and Ararat” makes the following
-grave comment:--
-
-“Twenty years is a short space in the life of a nation. But these
-twenty years have been filled with sufferings for the Armenian
-Christians greater than their ancestors had to endure during the eight
-centuries that have passed since the first Turkish Conquest of Armenia.
-They have been years of misery, slaughter, martyrdom, agony, despair.”
-
-And the years that have followed from 1896 to 1909 have had the same
-tale of woe to unfold; a tale of horrors such as have never been
-surpassed in the history of nations.
-
-The opinion of the Turkish Pasha, “The way to get rid of the Armenian
-Question, is to get rid of the Armenians” was followed by “le Sultan
-Rouge,” and that the monster and assassin who sat on the Turkish
-throne from 1876 to 1909 was not able to accomplish this policy to the
-bitter end of complete extermination, was no doubt due to the grit and
-stubborn endurance of the victims.
-
-A Turkish writer has made the remark, “There are Armenians, but there
-is no Armenia.” This assertion would be true if meant in a political
-sense only, for of all civilized races on earth, Armenians are
-politically one of the most forlorn, but the country has not been wiped
-off the map. It still occupies the geographical place it has held since
-history has been written. The land of the Euphrates and Tigris, that
-Araxes valley, where, as simple and primitive Armenians will to this
-day assert in unshaken belief, God made man in His own image, and the
-country round the base of Ararat, where the generations of men once
-more began to people the earth.
-
-Once the land of Ararat was an independent kingdom until the tide of
-victory rolled over it and conquered its independence. Hemmed round
-by three Great Empires, Russian, Turkish and Persian, the unfortunate
-geographical position of the country became the cause of its people’s
-ruin.
-
-It is of bitter interest to Armenians to know that Ararat is the point
-where the three Empires, Russian, Turkish and Persian, meet, whilst
-the children of the land of Ararat have passed under the sovereignties
-of Czar, Sultan and Shah. Thus it may be true that there is no Armenia
-in the political sense of the word, but if Armenia has lost her
-independence, the Armenian people have survived.
-
-The Author of “Transcaucasia and Ararat” thus writes of them:--
-
-“The Armenians are an extraordinary people, with a tenacity of national
-life scarcely inferior to that of the Jews.”
-
-The remark is true. There are two nations of antiquity who
-notwithstanding unremitting persecutions, and centuries of loss of
-independence, have survived their contemporary nations; their fortunes
-have run on parallel lines, though their national characteristics have
-been different in some respects. Together with his other avocations,
-the Armenian is mountaineer, soldier, labourer, agriculturist, while
-the Jew is purely a dweller in cities; but the same virility of life,
-the same mental and physical strength have sustained both. The sons
-of Heber, great grandson of Shem, have however become wise in their
-generation, the Jew is now more American than the American, more
-British than the British, more French than the French, more German than
-the German. Not so the sons of Haik, great grandson of Japhet, for with
-the same determined obstinacy with which he has clung to his faith, the
-Armenian clings to his nationality. He has known how to resist Russian
-endeavours of absorption, and Turkish systems of extermination. When
-he gives up his nationality, it will be the story of the hunted animal
-brought to its last gasp.
-
-The Armenians have been called “the most determined of Christians,”
-a remark the truth of which has been borne out by their unequalled
-martyrdom for their faith; and yet it may truly be said that in no
-Christian Church is the lay element more strong than it is in the
-Armenian Church. Conscious of this freedom, Armenians are surprised to
-read assertions made by some writers, about “the gross superstitions”
-of their Church, which they on their part regard as the happy medium
-between Protestantism and Roman Catholicism. Surrounded with pomp and
-splendour, and a show of outward ceremonies, which the average Armenian
-regards as no more than mere adjuncts to gratify and impress the
-sensibilities, the Liturgy of the Armenian Church, in its grandeur and
-pathos, appeals to the heart of the Armenian people, as no other form
-of worship can; it is the reason, as has truly been said of them, that
-“they carry their religion with them wherever they go.”
-
-The Armenians have also been called “the interpreters between the
-East and the West.” There is no doubt a certain adaptability which
-is a national characteristic; and as language is the vehicle of
-comprehension, their talent for acquiring languages helps to bring
-them into touch with Eastern and Western peoples; but the main truth
-of the observation lies in the fact, that being born Asiatics, and
-living for the most part in the midst of Asiatic surroundings, they
-fall into the ways of Asiatic life; they understand Asiatics better,
-and know how to sympathise with them; whilst on the other hand, their
-religion is the religion which has moulded the thought of the West, and
-consequently also the religion that has moulded the thought of a people
-who were the earliest Christians.
-
-The main point of social difference between them and other Asiatic
-nations, lies in the exalted position occupied by their women, and this
-point of difference may be traced to that one cause or influence, which
-has exalted the position of women in the West, the doctrines of Jesus
-of Nazareth. This point of difference in social life, together with the
-difference of religion, has always kept them separate from Persian and
-Turk.
-
-Private and trustworthy information to hand brings the news that the
-ex Sultan Abdul Hamid, aware of his impending dethronement, desired
-to bring about a general massacre of Christians in Constantinople,
-beginning with the foreign Embassies downwards. “I must be the last
-Padishah, even though Turkey perish,” was Abdul’s frantic appeal to his
-satellites, but his minions, not daring to venture on so dangerous an
-undertaking, planned the massacres to begin at the village of Adana,
-inhabited by the unfortunate Armenians. It was a safe plan, since the
-Armenians had no battleships to turn their guns upon Constantinople,
-and by the bombardment of the capital, to seek revenge for the murder
-of their countrymen.
-
-A massacre so wanton as that of Adana, can only find its counterpart in
-the other Turkish massacres of Armenians which preceded it.
-
-“Abdul the Damned” has been dethroned, but he has not been executed,
-and so long as he continues to draw breath, as long is there danger for
-the Armenians.
-
-We hear of the Mahommedans in India cabling their petition to the
-new Turkish Government to spare the life of the ex-Padishah and the
-ex-Caliph of Islam; the erstwhile “God’s shadow on earth” and the
-erstwhile “God’s envoy on earth” the sacredness of whose person should
-be inviolate. In this demonstration of the Indian Mahommedans, we
-can read the epistle of Mahommedan thought, and feel the pulse of
-Mahommedan feeling all over the Sunni Moslem world.
-
-Although intensely mercenary, Abdul Hamid however not only never
-grudged the gold which helped to accomplish the Armenian massacres,
-but he used it largely in douceurs which purchased silence or false
-representations of his diabolical acts, and it was by means of such
-douceurs that he went farther than seducing merely his own subjects.
-
-“Mais l’oeuvre de l’impérial corrupteur a dépassé les limites de son
-Palais et de ses États, N’a-t-il pas, en effet, étouffé sous des
-baillons dorés la voix d’importants organes de la presse européenne?
-N’a-t-il pas acheté à l’étranger des politiciens et même des diplomates?
-
-“Saïd Pacha ayant recherché ce qu’en six mois les massacres d’Arménie
-avaient coûté au Trésor turc, en allocations à certains journaux
-européens, a établi le compte approximatif suivant: 640 décorations, et
-235,000 Livres Turques (près de cinq millions et demi)!”[8]
-
-It needs not be added that no one who knows the truth of Turkish
-affairs, doubts the truth of this impeachment.
-
-“But whatever the future may bring, the past is past, and will one
-day fall to be judged. And of the judgement of posterity there can be
-little doubt.”
-
-In these memorable words, Mr. James Bryce in the supplementary chapter
-of his book “Transcaucasia and Ararat” concludes his criticism on
-what he calls “the fatal action followed by the fatal inaction of the
-European Powers.”
-
-It is true. As surely as the world revolves on her own axis, and as
-day succeeds night, so surely History will record and Posterity will
-judge. But what compensation to the Armenians? What compensation for
-the rivers of blood that have inundated their land? What atonement for
-the hideous past? What relief for the present? What hope for the future?
-
-
-
-
-THE ARMENIAN MASSACRES AND THE FUTURE OF THE ARMENIANS.
-
-
-The above is a subject for profound meditation for the Armenian people;
-it has therefore naturally for me occupied much deep thought.
-
-National Autonomy has been the dream of the Armenians; a dream which
-through centuries of oppression and years of slaughter, the nation
-has been striving and struggling to realize. The oldest of historical
-nations, we have held to our nationality, language and religion; we
-have struggled and striven, and though billows of affliction have
-swept over us, we have not allowed ourselves to be engulfed. “Love is
-stronger than Death” and truly the Armenian has loved his nationality
-with a steadfastness and tenacity that has conquered death.
-
-Steady, stubborn grit, combined with a remarkable natural intelligence
-have been characteristics of the race, and have kept us alive in spite
-of national adversities, such as no other nation could have suffered
-and survived.
-
-But our position is an acutely unhappy and an acutely unfortunate one.
-Our misfortunes began with the physical geography of our country.
-Surrounded by three great empires, our kingdom was strangled by the
-overwhelming pressure, and to-day our country is divided up between
-Russia, Turkey and Persia. For this reason we have been a great deal
-more unfortunate than the Balkan States, and now if there were any
-possible chance of wresting autonomy for Turkish Armenia from Turkey,
-Russia fearing the spread of the same spirit in her own provinces,
-would assuredly not only frown on such an attempt but use all the means
-in her power to crush it.
-
-There is also a stern fact which a people so politically helpless and
-forlorn as ourselves must ever bear in mind, namely, that we live in an
-intensely selfish and intensely grasping world; no prating the pretty
-nonsense of Western Civilization, or Western Humanity, or Western
-Christianity can alter that stern hard fact as it stands, and as it has
-stood since the history of our world has been written.
-
-Indeed, nineteenth century civilization, which has made the world
-of commerce acutely grasping, has also made the world of Politics
-unscrupulously selfish.
-
-However much it may clothe itself in the garment of fair speech,
-what we call “Politics” is actually made up of that one devouring,
-absorbing, grasping element--Selfishness. “The friends of to-day may be
-enemies to-morrow” is more truly spoken in the domain of Politics than
-anywhere else.
-
-Let the Armenians take a lesson not only from the Turkish massacres,
-but from the attitude of Europe towards those massacres? Let them look
-back on the past, and remember how they have been trampled under the
-merciless foot of Political Selfishness, and then left to welter in
-their gore.
-
-Who doubts, who can gainsay, that by so much as the lifting up of a
-finger the Powers of Europe could have stopped those massacres? Was
-that finger ever lifted up, however, all through the long years of
-“slaughter, martyrdom, agony, despair” to save our helpless people
-from butcheries so enormous, so hideous, so appalling that no pen
-could portray the horrible realities? Had the Turkish bonds been in
-jeopardy, Constantinople harbour would have witnessed the battleships
-of the Powers of Europe discharging their cannon on the capital of
-the Turkish Empire, but a hundred thousand or five hundred thousand
-Armenians, more or less, mangled and butchered to death, or fleeing
-from their sacked and burning villages to die of cold and starvation in
-their mountain passes, could not rouse action on the part of Europe,
-even though the Concert of Europe had been instrumental in their
-destruction.
-
-I do not write with a desire to indulge in recriminations, since vain
-recriminations will not bear profitable fruit; but I write with the
-object of impressing on my countrymen to remember, always to remember,
-the lessons written on the pages of a past that should never be
-forgotten by us.
-
-In his book “Our Responsibilities for Turkey” the late Duke of Argyll
-quotes from the famous despatch of a British Ambassador to Turkey, the
-date being given as September 4, 1876. The despatch proceeds thus:--
-
-“To the accusation of being a blind partisan of the Turks I will only
-answer that my conduct here has never been guided by any sentimental
-affection for them, but by a firm determination to uphold the interests
-of Great Britain to the utmost of my power; and that those interests
-are deeply engaged in preventing the disruption of the Turkish Empire
-is a conviction which I share in common with the most eminent statesmen
-who have directed our foreign policy, but which appears now to be
-abandoned by shallow politicians or persons who have allowed their
-feelings of revolted humanity to make them forget the capital interests
-involved in the question.
-
-“We may and must feel indignant at the needless and monstrous severity
-with which the Bulgarian insurrection was put down; _but the necessity
-which exists for England to prevent changes from occurring here
-which would be most detrimental to ourselves is not affected by the
-question whether it was 10,000 or 20,000 persons who perished in the
-suppression_.
-
-“We have been upholding what we know to be a semi-civilized nation,
-liable under certain circumstances to be carried into fearful excesses;
-but the fact of this having just now been strikingly brought home to us
-all cannot be a sufficient reason for abandoning a policy which is the
-only one that can be followed with due regard to our interest.”
-
-I quote this famous despatch merely to point out that “due regard to
-our interest” was carefully followed out in the Past by the Powers of
-Europe, and that “due regard to our interest” will be just as carefully
-followed out in the Present and in the Future.
-
-From the Turk and Persian, the Armenian must ever remain separate, as
-he has through centuries, though living in the midst of them, remained
-separate. The gulf that divides the one nation from the other two,
-the wall of iron that rises between them is the position of woman. The
-Armenian has accepted whole-heartedly the position in which woman has
-been placed by the Great Founder of his faith. For seventeen hundred
-years unremittingly since Christianity was revived in Armenia by
-Gregory the Illuminator, the Christian law with regard to the position
-of woman has moulded the thought of the nation, it has left its impress
-on the nation, and it is this vital and essential difference between
-the law of Mahommed and the law of Christ that like a two-edged sword
-has cleaved apart Christian Armenian from Moslem Turk and Persian.
-
-If “East is East, and West is West” it is on account of the social
-plane on which woman stands, a social plane that is never so degraded
-in any corner of Asia, as it is in the countries where the law of
-Mahommed governs.
-
-The Armenians in Asiatic Turkey are scattered and dispersed among Turks
-and other antagonistic races; they are without any military force or
-organization to wrest autonomy from the military and governing power.
-That Europe should aid their endeavours, or that Turkey should make
-them a free gift of autonomy, are both of them absolutely out of the
-question. Then what remains for us?
-
-To hold to our own nationality and to be subject--Subject to Russia,
-subject to Turkey, subject to Persia--What shall it profit us? What
-will it profit? What doth it profit us? Our strong, clever, energetic
-men, our beautiful, intelligent women, when neither chance nor
-opportunity can enable our finest and best to reach the higher rungs of
-the world’s ladder, and when as a subject people we must ever remain
-hewers of wood and drawers of water, even our Aivasowskis and our
-Melikoffs have been known to the world as Russians, not as Armenians.
-Have we a chance of bursting the fetters? Have we strength to break the
-chains? Can we reach the goal toward which, bleeding and torn, we have
-been striving, and still are striving? These are questions which we
-must ask ourselves; looking them soberly in the face.
-
-But this is not enough: if we must persist in holding to our
-nationality, we must look into ourselves, we must search out and probe
-our national failings and our national weaknesses, and find out in what
-essential characteristics we are wanting as a nation, and so build up
-national character. Let us weigh ourselves in the balance, and supply
-what in us is found wanting.
-
-In the period of less than a decade a Great Power has risen in the
-Orient. The people of a small island empire with an empty Treasury
-have beaten successfully and disastrously a colossal empire of whom
-the Powers of Europe had stood in awe, and against whom not one had
-ventured single-handed to engage.
-
-On the field the ever victorious army of little Japan undermined
-Russia’s stronghold, and succeeded in driving back and ever driving
-back the ever defeated and ever retreating army of colossal Russia.
-At sea the ever victorious Japanese Fleet succeeded in completely
-annihilating the Russian Fleet. It was war such as the world had
-never yet seen. The secret of such astounding successes should be
-investigated, and here I beg leave to quote from one of a series of
-articles in which I gave view to my opinions during the Russo-Japanese
-War. “Japan may be likened to the bundle of faggots in the fable
-firmly tied together; one faggot of larger dimensions in the centre,
-the sovereign round whom the whole nation clusters, and all, ruler and
-people tied together by adamantine bands of patriotism.”
-
-These remarks of mine were based on observations of actual facts. In
-national unity Japan stands as an object lesson to the world; she
-furnishes an example which the world needs to copy, and which a nation
-so politically forlorn as ourselves more than any other needs to copy.
-
-From the astounding success of Japan let us turn to the position
-the Great Republic of the United States of America occupies in the
-world, and take the lesson to heart of what Union can accomplish as we
-contrast their present position with the position that the handful of
-puritan pilgrims occupied when they first landed on American soil not
-quite three hundred years ago.
-
-National Unity is our greatest need; it is the banner which we must
-raise up over our national life. National Unity must be engraven on the
-tablets of our minds and throb in the pulses of our hearts. There are
-mountains of difficulties before us, and if ever we must reach the goal
-we can only do so by being bound together like the bundle of faggots in
-the fable, with no weakening or loosening of the bands. Then perhaps we
-might once more be able to get an independent footing on the historical
-soil of our fathers, and perhaps once more rally round our own flag.
-A Japanese lives for the State, not for himself; we have no State for
-which to live, but let us live for our communities whilst we keep the
-hope in our hearts that communities grow into States.
-
-We have grit and endurance in an unparalleled degree, but these
-characteristics will profit us nothing if we are wanting in unity.
-
-Let us remember that utterance of the Founder of our faith. In our
-loyalty and allegiance to Him our life-blood has flowed like the
-torrents of a cataract, but we must remember His warning utterance:--
-
-“What shall it profit a man.” What shall it profit a nation. Unity is
-the soul of a nation. Let us keep our soul and not lose it.
-
-
-
-
-THE ARMENIAN MASSACRES AND CIVILIZED EUROPE.
-
- “Hear then ye Senates! hear this truth sublime,
- They who allow Oppression share the crime.”
-
- “A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping;
- Rahel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her
- children, because they were not.”
-
-
-In the twentieth century of the christian era, in the age of trumpeted
-progress, of boasted and vaunted civilization, there is a Ramah of
-countries, a desolated Ramah, blackened and calcined with the fires
-of oppression, and over her desolated wastes there flows, flows,
-continually flows, ever replenished and ever renewed, that red stream
-which crieth up from the earth to God: and out of this modern Ramah, a
-voice is heard of lamentation and bitter weeping, it riseth up in its
-boundless anguish to reach the heavens, it crieth out and will not be
-stopped, for it is the voice of the Rahel of nations weeping for her
-children and refusing to be comforted, because they are not.
-
-Ah! thou Rahel of nations! to the cry of thy boundless anguish, to
-thy lamentation and bitter weeping, Christendom and Civilization,
-the Christendom and Civilization of Europe have replied “Are we thy
-children’s keepers?”
-
-Who that has read the history of the Crusades has not turned with
-sickening disgust from the chapters wherein history has recorded the
-savage barbarities and fearful excesses of those christian warriors,
-who went to Palestine ostensibly fired with the enthusiasm of a holy
-cause, but in reality only to glut in slaughter and gratify brutal
-passions. Europe has, however, designated her past as the “dark ages”
-into which she has thrust back, the ferocious outbursts of religion,
-the merciless persecutions of the church, the savage sweep of the
-barbarians of the north, and the unbridled tyrannies of despotic power,
-from all which she loudly boasts to have emancipated herself, and like
-the evolution according to the Darwinian theory of the anthropomorphal
-ape, to have progressed into the state of civilization. But beginning
-from the last quarter of the nineteenth and on into the first decade of
-the twentieth century, the horrors of the darkest ages in human history
-have lain at her doors, and towards these horrors Europe has kept up
-the role of an extenuatingly disclaiming, a mildly rebuking, sweetly
-frowning, smilingly denouncing, Disapprover.
-
-Half a million Armenians annihilated by organized massacres of the most
-ferocious and hideous natures, and perhaps a corresponding number
-fated either to rot to death in Turkish prisons or made homeless and
-destitute to die of cold and starvation, with Europe nonchalantly
-looking on is surely convincing proof that the Humanity, Christianity
-and Civilization of Europe are whited sepulchres, hiding by the smooth
-outside the rottenness within; therefore ye priests of the gospel come
-down from your pulpits, close your churches, hold your tongues and
-be silent for ever, for the Christianity you preach has bowed itself
-out, if ever it existed, in Christian Europe. The Christ of Europe
-is the demon of greed and the demon of land hunger, and the god of
-civilization is Mammon.
-
-In 1878 an astounding policy was carried out by Great Britain; it was
-the crowning act of her long continued support to Turkey, a government
-she knew to be hopelessly vicious and profoundly cruel and bad to the
-core. With this Power, England posing before the world as the home of
-freedom, the friend of the oppressed, and the defender of the rights
-and liberties of man, entered into a Convention. It was called the
-“Anglo-Turkish Convention,” of which Article I reads thus:
-
-“If Batum, Ardahan, Kars, or any of them, shall be retained by Russia,
-and if any attempt shall be made at any future time by Russia to take
-possession of any further territories of his Imperial Majesty the
-Sultan in Asia, as fixed by the definitive Treaty of Peace, England
-engages to join his Imperial Majesty the Sultan in defending them by
-force of arms. In return his Imperial Majesty the Sultan promises to
-England to introduce necessary reforms, to be agreed upon later between
-the two Powers, into the government and for the protection of the
-Christian and other subjects of the Porte in these territories. And in
-order to enable England to make necessary provision for executing her
-engagement, his Imperial Majesty the Sultan further consents to assign
-the island of Cyprus to be occupied and administered by England.”
-
-It is well to remark here what was blazoned to the world at the time
-that part of those “_necessary reforms_” “_in these territories_”
-include twenty-two large organized massacres of Armenians (besides
-smaller ones) dating from September 30th, 1895 to December 29th, 1895;
-and be it remembered that these were massacres of a hideousness and
-ferocity of nature even devils could not rival; besides also other
-organized massacres by the Turkish Government of the same nature (large
-and small) both before and after that period.
-
-The British press, followed by a large section of the British public,
-raged against what they called the advance of Russia in the East, as
-they had already raged for half a century past. It is astonishing how
-one nation can swallow its own camels and strain at the other’s gnats.
-
-However, this Anglo-Turkish Convention and the Congress at Berlin was
-the crowning act of England’s support and defense of a power whose rule
-had been characterized by mis-rule, massacre and oppression. Her prime
-minister returned from the Congress of Berlin loudly proclaiming “Peace
-with Honour.” Of that “Honour” Time has been the test, and Time has
-revealed to the world that “Peace” in its true character.
-
-Dating from the Congress of Berlin the supreme tragedy of Armenia
-begins; deliberately and without compunction England revived the
-dying tyranny of Turkey for the Armenians, deliberately and without
-compunction she took away from them (a people politically the most
-helpless and forlorn of all civilized nations) the only protection they
-had of a powerful neighbour willing and able to enforce its protection,
-and rivetted on their necks the yoke of the cruellest oppressor that
-the world had yet known. The history of the rule of the house of Osman
-up to the thirty-fourth Padishah was knowledge enough and experience
-enough for the British Government and the British people, and yet in
-the last quarter of the civilized nineteenth century, the great and
-enlightened Christian power of Great Britain proceeded to carry out
-and complete this gigantic political crime of fastening on the necks
-of a struggling Christian people, the last remnants of an ancient
-civilization, the merciless yoke of their oppressors. From that time
-onward history must mark the course of the supreme tragedy of Armenia.
-
-The bold move taken by the Patriarch Nerses of sending delegates to the
-Congress of Berlin cost the renowned prelate his life, his firm refusal
-to recall his delegates aroused the last fury of Turkey’s Padishah; the
-Patriarch was stealthily murdered and his genius and great personal
-influence lost to the cause of his people.
-
-But a loss greater than the loss of their beloved leader befell the
-Armenians in the assassination of the Emperor Alexander II, whose
-untimely death plunged Russia back into the night of ignorance, bigotry
-and superstition, of the savagery and slavery, out of the darkness of
-which he was leading her; the best and noblest of Czars was succeeded
-by a son whose policy shaped itself directly contrary to that of his
-father’s, and Russia from being the help of the Armenians under Turkish
-rule turned into one of the pillars of support of their oppressor.
-
-“Since 1884,” writes Mr. James Bryce, “it has been generally understood
-in Constantinople that the Russian Embassy has made no serious effort
-to bring about any radical change in Turkish administration, and it was
-indeed believed that the more England remonstrated the more did Russia
-point out to the Sultan how much he had erred in supposing that England
-was his friend.”
-
-We have it on the authority of Professor Arminius Vambéry that the
-Czar Alexander III had given assurances of his friendship and support
-to Sultan Abdul Hamid; and there are not wanting political students
-who affirm that the Armenian Massacres were in part instigated by
-Russian politicians who saw, or professed to see, in a free Armenia
-an impediment to Russia’s advance in the south and a fostering of the
-spirit of independence in the Russian provinces of Armenia.[9] This on
-the authority of Mr. James Bryce was the reason which Prince Lobanoff
-assigned for his refusal to give support to British proposals of
-coercion towards Turkey. “On January 16, 1896,” so writes Mr. Bryce,
-“when the massacres had gone on for more than three months, he (Prince
-Lobanoff) ‘saw nothing to destroy his confidence in the bonne volonté
-of the Sultan, who was’ (”he felt assured“) ‘doing his best.’” And Mr.
-Bryce continues to add “Turkey, which in 1877 had looked to England
-for help against Russia, now turned to Russia for support against the
-menaces of England.”
-
-We have it also on the authority of Mr. Bryce that shortly after the
-terrible and cold-blooded massacre of Armenians at Constantinople “the
-German Ambassador presented to the Sultan a picture of the German
-Imperial family which he had asked for some time ago”[10] and the
-friendship of Kaiser Wilhelm for Abdul Hamid “his friend and brother,”
-as an American writer has called him; the costly gifts presented by the
-ex-Sultan to the German Imperial family, the magnificent reception of
-the Kaiser at Constantinople, and the still more magnificent concession
-of Turkish territory to Germany, are too well known to the world to
-need any further comment.
-
-Thus it became the fate of the unfortunate Armenians to be the bruised
-and mangled shuttle-cock of powerful bats.
-
-[Illustration: NERSES VARJABETIAN.
-
-(Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople).]
-
-Much has been written and much has been said by great authorities, (far
-more comprehensively and by pens much more forcible than my humble
-efforts could aspire to reach) against the selfishness and callousness,
-the inhumanity and cynicism of those great powers which have coldly
-looked on and permitted the hellish atrocities and horrors of the
-Armenian Massacres. The name of William Ewart Gladstone is loved and
-revered by Armenians all over the world; but the thunderings of that
-veteran statesman and the denouncing protests of those thoughtful men
-whose feelings of revolted humanity have made themselves heard in
-sounding language, have fallen on stony ground; they have been like the
-voices of men crying out in the wilderness. Europe has turned a deaf
-ear to the condemnations of justice and truth, even as she has turned a
-deaf ear to the voice of Rahel weeping for her slaughtered children.
-
-The victim of Abdul Hamid’s revenge who was stealthily murdered in his
-bed. He was elected Patriarch in 1843 and held the highest place in the
-esteem and affection of his people. Mr. James Bryce gives his age at
-the time of his election in 1843 as seventy-three; if this is correct
-then he was over a hundred years old when he was foully murdered. Mr.
-Bryce writes of him as, “the worthy leader of his nation,” “a man of
-high character and great ability.”
-
-A writer signing himself Beyzadé gives the following account of the
-Patriarch’s tragic death in the July number of “The Wide World:”
-
- The attempted poisoning and subsequent death of Monseigneur
- Nercès Varjabétian, the Armenian Patriarch and Archbishop of
- Constantinople, was a revolting illustration of the inhuman and
- barbarous tactics of the Yildiz Kiosk “Camarilla.” Monseigneur
- Nercès Varjabétian was not only one of the most prominent
- prelates of the Armenian Church, but was also a fearless
- patriot--a distinguished linguist, an eloquent preacher, and
- a thorough gentleman in every sense of the word. When peace
- was concluded between Turkey and Russia, and preparations were
- being made for the Berlin Congress, it was he who, in spite of
- the feared fanatical uprising of the Turks, threw prudence to
- the winds and took a step that will long be remembered in the
- annals of Armenian history.
-
- At the first meeting of the Berlin Congress the Turkish
- delegates were thunderstruck to learn from official sources
- that an Armenian delegation had arrived from Constantinople,
- sent by Monseigneur Nercès, the Patriarch, their object being
- to request the signatory Powers of the Berlin Treaty to force a
- guarantee from the Turkish Government to make certain important
- improvements in Armenia.
-
- Abdul Hamid and his advisers were furious at this affront, and
- Monseigneur Nercès was summoned to the Palace. It is said that
- when he received the summons he simply smiled and asked one of
- his curates to read the Burial Service to him, as he did not
- expect to return alive. However, he went. No one has ever heard
- what passed between the Sultan and himself at the interview;
- suffice it to say that he immediately summoned the Armenian
- General Assembly and tendered his resignation. This was not
- accepted by the Assembly, and, amidst enthusiastic cheers,
- he was carried back to his apartments at the Patriarchate.
- Meanwhile a peremptory order reached him, signed by the Sultan,
- to recall the Armenian delegation from Berlin. This Monseigneur
- Varjabétian point-blank refused to do, and retired to his
- private residence at Haskeuy, a village on the Golden Horn.
- The success of the delegation, however, did not come up to
- his expectations. The Armenians, as it happened, could not be
- heard, but they were so far successful as to have an article
- inserted in the treaty.
-
- The Sultan and his advisers never forgave the Patriarch this,
- though they could not openly do anything to him on account of
- his enormous popularity. Time passed on, and to all appearance
- the incident was forgotten, but it was not so. One summer
- afternoon a most cordial invitation was sent by a very high
- dignitary of the Palace, requesting the Archbishop to dine
- with him informally. An invitation of this kind could not very
- well be refused, so the Archbishop, accompanied only by a
- body-servant named Vartan, repaired to the Pasha’s house. The
- Pasha received him at the door and escorted the visitor with
- much ceremony and extreme courtesy to a private apartment of
- the salamlik of his house (the men’s quarters), where dinner
- was served. The geniality displayed by his host dispelled any
- fears that the Archbishop might have had as to his personal
- safety.
-
- After dinner, as usual, coffee was served. Now, this serving
- of the coffee is rather a ceremonial according to high Turkish
- etiquette, and it is not unusual for guests to bring their
- own _tchooboukdar_ (the servant who carries his master’s pipe
- and pouch and also superintends the making of his coffee).
- The Archbishop was presented with a “tchoobouk” (pipe) filled
- and lighted for smoking, and a servant followed with coffee.
- The Archbishop accepted both with due compliments to his
- host, and took a sip at his coffee. Just at that moment the
- heavy curtains over the doorway were thrown apart, revealing
- the ghastly pale face of his servant Vartan, who cried, in
- Armenian, in a voice trembling with emotion, “Monseigneur, I
- did not brew the coffee!”
-
- This was enough for the Archbishop; he pretended to be
- startled and spilt the coffee, but, alas! he had already
- drunk a small quantity of it. Meanwhile a scuffle was going
- on behind the _portière_, where his poor servant Vartan was
- paying the penalty of his devotion to his master. Concerning
- Vartan’s whereabouts or his ultimate end nothing was ever
- made public--the poor fellow simply vanished. Monseigneur
- Varjabétian, after a short interval thanked the Pasha for his
- generous and kind hospitality and took his departure. On the
- way home he was taken violently ill and a doctor was hastily
- summoned. The Patriarch took to his bed, and lost all his hair
- through the effects of the poison. Then, one morning, when a
- servant took his breakfast upstairs he found, to his horror,
- that both the bedroom door and the window were wide open and
- his beloved master lay dead in his bed, which was covered with
- blood! There are no such things as coroners and juries in
- Turkey to ascertain the causes of mysterious deaths of this
- kind, but the news that the Patriarch was dead spread like
- wildfire through Constantinople. The Sultan himself thought it
- advisable to show some concern in the matter, and aides-de-camp
- from the Palace were sent to the Patriarchate to learn the
- full details of this “sad catastrophe,” as they termed it. The
- official statement was that the Archbishop died of dysentery.
- Only a very few know how the Archbishop had died, and they
- wisely kept their mouths shut.
-
- I was told the details of this story by a high official of the
- Armenian Patriarchate. It seems that as the poison did not act
- as quickly as the Patriarch’s enemies had anticipated, owing
- to his having been cautioned in the nick of time, they “had
- to resort to other means”! The funeral was the largest ever
- witnessed in Constantinople, with an escort of Turkish cavalry
- sent specially by the Sultan, and representatives of all the
- religious denominations and the Diplomatic Corps. I was myself
- present, representing a foreign Government.
-
-
-
-
-PART II.
-
-
-
-
-OUT OF THE DEPTHS.
-
- “Oh that my head were waters and mine eyes a fountain of tears,
- that I might weep day and night for the slain of my people.”
-
-
-A book has been written and published in Japan, its title “Niku Dan”
-translated into English, reads, “Human Bullets.” This little book, a
-narrative of the siege of Port Arthur, after being read through the
-length and breadth of the empire, found translators to translate it
-into the best known of languages; and its young author, himself an
-actor in the siege, was summoned to the presence of his sovereign to
-be thanked and praised. The book is a graphic narrative of the most
-terrible siege in history, wherein is vividly portrayed the deadly
-struggle of the besiegers. It contains as an acknowledgement of its
-merit, a page on which is recorded the Field Marshal’s appreciation,
-and another page bearing the Commanding General’s commendation.
-
-In simple narrative the author carries the reader through appalling
-scenes of horror, and as we read we are made to realize the slaughter
-of the enemy’s machine guns, of their ground-mines, electric-wire
-entanglements, and exploding shells; we are made to hear the roar of
-the artillery fire dealing death and destruction, and there rises
-before us the mental vision of the fierce hand to hand conflict, and
-the dead and dying lying thickly in the dark ravine.
-
- “For hill and battle plain,
- With dying men and slain,
- Grew mountain heights of pain,
- And mine is boundless woe.”
-
-The grim warrior who stormed and took the most impregnable fortress
-in the world gives expression to his feelings on his own great
-achievement, in saddest words.
-
- “And mine is boundless woe,”
-
-For the grim warrior’s heart is cleft in twain for the human bullets
-that under his command hurled themselves to their death.
-
-In the world’s greatest war, human bullets were sacrificed for the
-protection of hearths and homes and a nation’s existence, moreover the
-human bullets were made of men who fought and died for sovereign and
-country.
-
-But there is a counter picture of horrors in which also there has
-been a sacrifice of human bullets, made not only of men but of women
-and children, human bullets, not of soldiers, themselves fortified
-and equipped with instruments of slaughter for fighting and grappling
-with the foe, but human bullets of unarmed men, of helpless women and
-children, of youth and old age, caught like rats in a rat-trap; and
-these human bullets have been sacrificed to the savage lusts of murder
-and plunder of the world’s fiercest oppressors, and to the political
-and commercial interests of civilized nations.
-
-In the first decade of the civilized twentieth century, a horrible and
-wanton slaughter of unarmed men, of helpless women and children has
-been perpetrated with all the accessories of cruelties unsurpassed for
-their fiendishness: whole towns and villages have been desolated, homes
-pillaged and destroyed, not only men, but women and children subjected
-to hideous deaths and nameless horrors, which no pen could depict in
-their true realism, and the details could never go into print, and
-this wanton slaughter, even as the many of a similar nature that have
-preceded it, has come and gone like a ripple on a smooth sea.
-
-No cry of horror has risen from the hearts of civilized nations! Turkey
-can butcher the helpless victims of her greed and carnivorous instincts
-with impunity, since Christendom and Civilization are busy only with
-Turkish concessions, with land grabbing and money making.
-
-“Human Bullets”! “Human Bullets”! here are human bullets of heavier
-rain than at the world’s grimmest siege; here are “sure death
-detachments” hurled to a more pitiful fate; and the civilized world
-does not care, for Armenian Massacres come and go, and the civilized
-world is getting used to them. But in the eternal order of things, a
-Nemesis follows human actions, be they of individuals or of nations.
-Material Prosperity is a great and good thing, but Moral Prosperity is
-greater and better. The Armenians may be done to their death, the last
-remnants of an ancient civilization may be exterminated and consigned
-in their blood to oblivion; but to the nations grown great in material
-prosperity that for their own selfish interests can allow and condone
-this hellish extermination, history teaches a mighty lesson. The moral
-cancer eating into the moral sense of nations, saps moral prosperity
-which in its turn undermines material prosperity. Great Empires once
-flourishing have decayed through moral poverty. History repeats itself.
-
-
-
-
-WHAT THE TURKISH CONSTITUTION MEANS FOR THE ARMENIANS.
-
-
-A year has passed since the inauguration of the Turkish Constitution;
-since the first glad cries of “liberty, fraternity, equality” were
-resounded as heralds of the peace and prosperity that were to follow;
-but although a whole year has passed, the Turkish Constitution, thus
-far, has only paraded itself as a spectacular effect, and as a panorama
-on shifting sand.
-
-A whole year has passed and the liberal Turks have produced neither a
-Prince Ito nor an Abraham Lincoln, though both were urgently needed to
-meet the pressing exigencies and heavy responsibilities of the times;
-and we may well ask now, Where is the man who is to hold the helm of
-the Constitutional ship and steer it over the turbulent waters?
-
-The task of the new régime was the most difficult that could have
-fallen to any administration. Beset on the one hand by the jealousies,
-rivalries, and political intrigues of European Powers; on the other, by
-the machinations of that “Red Beast” the ex-Sultan and his murderous
-and corrupt clique, by disappointed plundering pashas and officials
-(compelled to grant their arch enemy the ex-Sultan a lease of life
-through fear of a fanatical populace), the liberal Turks on their
-own part have not brought to bear upon their work any administrative
-ability, when extraordinary powers of governing and the highest and
-strongest genius for administration were absolutely needed. The Turk
-has always shown to the world that he is a born fighter, but a puerile
-administrator.
-
-For the Armenians the Constitution has resulted in two
-conditions--Massacre and Oppression; their hopes and aspirations have
-ended in the death throes of, as some accounts give, thirty thousand
-and others fifty thousand of their unhappy race, in homelessness and
-precipitation into absolute destitution of a few more thousands,[11]
-and in insecurity for the nation at large. An unarmed population
-scattered and dispersed among a hostile, murderous and fanatical
-populace; their position even under the new régime is to be compared to
-that of herbivorous animals standing at bay in the midst of ravening
-wolves.
-
-His spiritual interests call upon the Moslem Turk and the Moslem Kurd
-to murder the Christian Armenian; his material interests to plunder and
-enrich his own idleness with the worldly goods the other has acquired
-by his industry and toil, and the prosperity and well-being that the
-Armenian labours to bring to the fairest provinces under the sun are
-swooped upon and devastated by the brigandage of his enemies. Religious
-fanaticism and lust of plunder have always been governing elements in
-the Turkish massacres, and against these same religious fanaticism and
-lust of plunder, the Armenians stand to-day in deadly peril under the
-new régime.
-
-What more is to follow? Our hearts sicken to forecast, and our
-minds tremble to foresee. Are the balance of our striplings and our
-greybeards, our pen-men, and our ploughmen to be made to rot in
-Turkish dungeons, condemned to such loathsome horrors as can only be
-perpetrated in Turkish prisons? Are the balance of our women to be
-subjected to agonies so hideous and revolting that death at the fiery
-stake or on the iron rack were mercy and bliss? Are the balance of our
-babes and children to be exterminated like vermin? Are the balance
-of our people, the industrious, intelligent, clean, self-respecting
-element in the Turkish Empire, to be yet again hunted like wild beasts
-and killed like rats and flies?
-
-We are not wild and lawless descendants of Jenghis Khan and Tamerlane:
-we are peace-loving, law-abiding citizens, lovers of language and
-literature, of the arts and sciences, energetic traders, hardworking
-tillers of the soil, industrious artizans and labourers, producing in
-ourselves all the elements that constitute the society and well-being
-of civilized man; and as the oldest Christians, we ask of Christian
-nations, if we are to be trodden out?
-
-On the soil of our fatherland we are surrounded by a murderous,
-marauding, religion-frenzied populace, and neither Humanity nor
-Christianity will hold out to us a helping hand.
-
-If nothing else were done for the Armenians, at least Christian
-governors should be appointed over the provinces inhabited by them:
-we do not expect the Turkish Government to do this of their own
-initiative, but we have a right to expect the European Powers that were
-signatories to the Treaty of Berlin to compel the new régime to do
-it. Since the signing of the famous Treaty of Berlin thirty-one years
-ago, the history of the Armenians has been written in blood and tears,
-as the history of no other nation has been written before or now; and
-we ask, How long? How long will the Christian Powers stand silent
-witnesses to the work of slaughter and oppression carried on under
-their eyes?
-
-Alas! the weight of the Turkish bonds is too heavy in the scale, and
-Armenian life too light; the selfish interests of the European Powers
-involved in the Turkish Empire cannot be endangered to save the blood
-of three or four millions of Armenians, and the death warrant of an
-oppressed and bleeding nation can find no place on the table of the
-Hague Conference of Peace and Civilization.
-
-
-
-
-THE ARMENIAN QUESTION.
-
-
-In the closing pages of “Twenty Years of the Armenian Question”
-published in 1896, its distinguished author,[12] one of the greatest
-authorities on the subject, makes the following notable comment on the
-character and fate of the Armenian race.
-
-“They had maintained their nationality from immemorial times, before
-history began to be written. They had clung to their Christian faith,
-under incessant persecution for fifteen centuries. They were an
-intelligent, laborious race, full of energy, and increasing in numbers
-wherever oppression and murder did not check their increase, because
-they were more apt to learn, more thrifty in their habits, and far less
-infected by Eastern vices than their Mahommedan neighbours. They were
-the one indigenous population in Western Asia which, much as adversity
-had injured them, showed a capacity for moral as well as intellectual
-progress, and for assimilating the civilization of the West. In their
-hands the industrial future of Western Asia lay, whatever government
-might be established there; and those who had marked the tenacity and
-robust qualities of the race looked to them to restore prosperity
-to these once populous and flourishing countries when the blighting
-shadow of Turkish rule had passed away. But now, after eighteen years
-of constantly increasing misery, a large part, and, in many districts,
-the best part, of this race has been destroyed, and the remnant is
-threatened with extinction.”
-
-These remarks made in 1896 by a great and disinterested authority with
-a profound knowledge of the subject he was writing about, stand as true
-to-day as when they were written. From 1896 onwards, events following
-in succession one upon another have proved the truth and soundness of
-his opinions.
-
-Can the Armenians hope now for any change in their condition under
-Turkish rule? To this question, we must answer an emphatic No!
-
-The causes that must operate against any change are many and
-deep-seated. In the first place it cannot be expected that a few Turks
-of liberal ideas (or it may be French polished) at Constantinople,
-are going to change the thought and character of the nation. The
-characteristics of a people change very slowly, if they ever change at
-all, and the predominant national traits of the many-blooded modern
-Turk have been shown to the world to be, cruelty and fanaticism,
-combined with a fierce sensuality; and what is more than all, and which
-has to be remembered most, is, that they are a people accustomed to the
-unbridled gratification of their worst passions.
-
-The ethnographic traits of the Turkman which history bears out, are
-wildness and fierceness, and it would not be incorrect to argue that
-with the instincts of his primitive ancestors have been assimilated the
-many cross currents that run in his veins, into all of which has been
-infused the doctrines of the religion of the sword, a religion which
-does not make for the peace or well being of mankind; a religion, also,
-which assigning one of the two sexes to the degraded position of being
-created solely for the gross pleasure of the other, does not make for
-the exaltation of mankind.
-
-To quote again the eminent authority previously referred to: “No
-Mahommedan race or dynasty has ever shown itself able to govern well
-even subjects of its own religion, while to extend equal rights to
-subjects of a different creed is forbidden by the very law of its
-being.”
-
-Not the Jewish conceit proclaiming itself God’s elect and chosen, and
-originating the name “heathen” which it scorned. Not the Christian
-conceit emanating from the Jewish source, and laying the flattering
-unction to its soul of superiority over the “heathen” of its own time.
-Not the unbending caste exclusiveness of the Brahman across whose
-path even the shadow of the despised Sudra falling would be deemed
-defilement. Not any of these, can equal the intolerant religious pride
-of the Mahommedan, or reach the pinnacle of religious self-sufficiency
-on which he has seated himself. To be a Mahommedan, is enough--_Cela
-suffit_.
-
-To any one who has familiar acquaintance with Mahommedans, and intimate
-with Mahommedan thought, one fact must strike itself most forcibly, and
-that is, the Mahommedan is above all things a Mahommedan. His religion
-is the paramount question in his life, and remains its predominating
-feature above everything else. This should not be surprising, since to
-the “faithful” Paradise is secured, and all crimes and transgressions
-against “unbelievers” absolved.
-
-Added to these important factors of racial characteristics, influences
-of religion, and long grown habits of the Turk, we have also in
-Turkish Armenia another evil, from which the other provinces of the
-Turkish Empire fortunately for themselves have been exempt; this
-super-added evil, is, the large neighbouring bodies of Kurds and
-Circassians, greater marauders and depredators than the Turks, the
-regular occupation of whose lives comprises murder and robbery, and who
-have through weary centuries unremittingly quartered themselves upon
-the industrious christian peasants, and lived on the fruits of their
-labour and toil. Indeed as the Hamidieh cavalry which was established
-expressly for the Hamidian massacres was composed of these Kurds, it
-ought to be matter of speculation what outlet these warriors, trained
-and practised in organized murder, can now find for those habits in
-which they were encouraged and trained to indulge by the Hamidian
-régime.
-
-Under all such conditions no hope of better days can be forthcoming, no
-prospect of better times seems possible, for that unhappy portion of
-the Armenian race whom force of circumstances keeps on the soil of the
-fatherland.
-
-The appointment of Christian governors over the provinces inhabited
-by them might ameliorate some of the evils, or the other alternative,
-of allowing the use of arms to all alike, irrespective of creed or
-nationality, would furnish some means of self-defence against the raids
-and barbarities of the oppressors; but even if such concessions were
-granted, life for the christian peasant subject to Turkish rule, and
-living in the midst of his enemies, must remain one long struggle and
-battle against pillage, murder, depredation, and offences of the worst
-nature. Not the most fertile soil, not the most favourable climatic
-conditions, not the most assiduous industry, not the most peace loving,
-law abiding instincts, can bring to the Armenian peasant under Turkish
-rule even a modicum of that comfort, happiness, and security of life
-and property, which the law of all civilized countries guarantees to
-the industrious labourer and tiller of the soil.
-
-
-
-
-OPEN LETTER TO THE HONORABLE PRESIDENT WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT.
-
-
-EXCELLENT SIR,
-
-You are the President of the mighty Republic of the United States
-of America, and I am only an obscure unit of a forlorn and helpless
-nation, but encouraged by the intrinsic qualities of your head and
-heart, and also by the record of great and noble services rendered in
-the cause of oppressed humanity, by certain of your predecessors in the
-presidential chair (so encouraged) I venture humbly to address you. The
-annals of that presidential chair on which you sit are clear and bright
-as the noonday sun; turning over the pages of their brightness, I am
-encouraged to address you its present occupant.
-
-Your immediate predecessor rendered a great service in the interests
-of Humanity, by bringing a terrible and bloody war to its close. His
-staunch strong hand of friendship was held out to the gallant nation
-fighting heroically for its national existence, whilst the might of
-his iron will strenuously contested and made the peace which will ever
-be associated with his name, but there was a peace which his great
-heart wished to break but could not succeed in breaking, and which his
-upright mind has branded as “infamous”: such are his own words “the
-infamous peace kept by the joint action of the great powers, while
-Turkey inflicted the last horrors of butchery, torture and outrage upon
-the men, women and children of despairing Armenia.”[13] For thirty-one
-years the great European Powers kept up by joint action an infamous
-peace, and out of regard for their own selfish interests allowed a
-corrupt, vicious, gangrened and blood-thirsty power to wreak its
-hellish atrocities not only on the men, but on the women and children
-of a helpless nation.
-
-These are strong words, but they are true, and you will agree with me
-that the meanest and humblest of God’s creatures has a right to speak
-the truth, and that greatest is the right to speak the truth, when
-it is spoken in the cause of murdered, outraged and misery-stricken
-humanity.
-
-The yoke of Turkey rivetted on the necks of the Armenians by England in
-1878, was rivetted again by Russia, and yet again rivetted by Germany.
-The political interests and the commercial interests of Europe have
-trampled us under foot; we have been sacrificed on the altar of the
-political animosities of England and Russia, and given over, men,
-women and children to butchery, slaughter, imprisonment, torture;
-we have been crushed under the iron wheels of the Baghdad railway, a
-greater Juggernauth for us, while the ex-Sultan received his payment
-and “bartered a kingdom for the Kaiser’s friendship”; and yet again
-we have been crushed when British diplomacy checkmated William of
-Hohenzollern’s dream.
-
-The death warrant of our bleeding nation has found no place on the
-table of the Hague Conference of Peace and Civilization since the
-selfish interests of the European Powers would give it no abiding room.
-President of a great and free Republic, let it be the work of your
-mighty hands to lay it there. The Cabinets of Europe have turned a deaf
-ear to the death shriek of our bleeding nation, let our despairing cry
-be heard now in the Senate of the United States of America.
-
-It remains for the historian of the future to record the Armenian
-Massacres as the foulest blot and the blackest stain on European
-Civilization and European International Morality, but in addressing
-you now I will turn down the pages of the hideous Past, and humbly lay
-open the pages of the Present, on which is clearly written the deadly
-peril in which our nation stands: the book is open, and who will may
-read. For it is not the goodwill of the new régime that has to be
-taken into calculation, as far as the Armenians are concerned, but the
-powerfulness or the powerlessness of the new régime to make for their
-protection.
-
-How can we forget Adana? A whole town and villages sacked and
-desolated; fifty thousand of our men, women and children done to
-horrible deaths, and the residue left to homelessness and starvation.
-How can we forget that the arch-enemy of Christian and liberal Turk
-still lives, dethroned but not executed, and that through fear of his
-worshippers and his adherents the liberal Turks are compelled to pamper
-and support the monster assassin of the world? When such difficulties
-beset the path of the liberal Turks, the rulers, what security is there
-for a subject people, alien in race and religion?
-
-President of a great and free Republic, we need a friend, we ask for
-your mighty hands to be held out to us in succour, since the number of
-our enemies are legion: even Nature has arrayed herself against us in
-the inexorable conditions of the physical geography of our country.
-Shall the President of a mighty Republic with noble traditions; shall
-the christian men and women of the United States leave us to our
-terrible fate?
-
-“To serve Armenia is to serve Civilization.” These words were spoken
-by a great and revered statesman; the noble handiwork of his Creator
-(William Ewart Gladstone), now gone to his honored rest. “Do not let
-me be told that one nation has no authority over another” was his reply
-to the Armenian deputation which waited on him in 1894. Let his reply
-be your answer to us now, President of a mighty Republic; let it be
-your answer written in golden letters across the banner of that great
-civilization, of which you are the presiding head.
-
-The Republic of the United States of America has been compared to that
-grain of mustard seed, which when planted in the earth budded forth and
-grew into such dimensions that the birds of the air lodged under the
-branches thereof. I pray that the shadow of those branches be extended
-over my bleeding nation.
-
-
-
-
-ABDUL HAMID, THE TRIUMPH OF CRIME.
-
-
-A monster assassin! Has he been brought before the bar of his country,
-tried and condemned to the penalty of death, such as in the days of his
-power he meted out to hundreds of thousands of innocents? Has he been
-cast into a loathsome prison, such as the many in which thousands of
-his victims have rotted and died? Nay! not so! it is not so decreed in
-Turkey.
-
-In Turkey, a camarilla of murderous and plundering pashas, and a
-fanatical and marauding populace stand behind a Padishah who knew how
-to furnish gratification for the murdering and marauding instincts of
-his adherents. Nay! neither death nor imprisonment for the Padishah
-whose sovereignty was the most auspicious for brigandage and murder.
-Who dares to slay or imprison the demigod of rapine and despotism? Such
-things cannot be done in Turkey.
-
-For crimes that were in comparison as light as air, those puerile
-tyrants, Charles of England and Louis of France forfeited their heads.
-Poor Charles and Louis! Your heads chopped off and your bodies trundled
-away in a cart: no glorifying spiritualized titles of Zeid and Imam
-read out in your bills of indictment; such glorifying spiritualized
-titles are reserved for monster assassins in Turkey.
-
-In Turkey, a monster assassin whose list of murders rank him as premier
-assassin of the world, who under heel of iron and fire annihilated
-the rights and liberties of his subjects is pensioned off to live in
-purple and fare sumptuously: housed in a luxurious palace, he sits on
-carpeted divans, supported by silken and velvet pillows, with eleven
-ministering houris, the youngest and fairest of his past entourage,
-to solace the “dolce far niente” of his deposed Padishahdom. Ample
-leisure, possible opportunities to hatch plots for the subversion of
-law and order, and the revival of the reign of plunder and massacre.
-But it is so allowed in Turkey. It is enough to be a Caliph and a
-Padishah to be able to count victims, not by thousands, but by hundreds
-of thousands, and remain immune from punishment for mountains of crime.
-
-What evil, what woe and desolation hast thou not wrought, spiritualized
-Zeid and Imam, Caliph and Padishah? And yet thou art allowed to live!
-Evil genius of thy people! thou hast worked out their moral degradation
-to the lowest depths that a nation could fall; but limitless evil,
-supremest woe, hast thou worked over the nation whose country thou
-turned into a charnel house of slaughter, and over whom thy reign of
-thirty-three years hung like a pestilence. Who can count the multitude
-of thy crimes against them, who can measure the height and the depth of
-the woe that thou laid over their lives. Hearths and homes pillaged and
-desolated, harvest fields turned into rivers of blood, not thousands
-upon thousands, but hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children
-tortured with devilish ingenuities of torture, imprisoned in loathsome
-dungeons, outraged, butchered, slaughtered, hunted like wild beasts,
-left to homelessness and starvation.
-
-Enough blood to drown a leprous souled and gangrened souled Padishah
-and his gangrened pack of followers! Enough crime to hang a Caliph!
-
-Out with thy Caliphate! even by the law of thy prophet, that fierce
-son of the desert, the Caliph is ordained protector of the weak and
-helpless; what didst thou with thy thirty-three years of Caliphal
-power, except crush the weak and annihilate the helpless.
-
-The very earth has echoed with the dying cry of the least of them,
-those “christian puppies” with little bodies piled up one upon another,
-and little heads struck off together at one stroke; with the frenzied
-shrieks of mothers who have seen with their own eyes the slaughter
-of their children, with the anguished wail of women, with the death
-groans of youth and old age. Aye! the very earth has echoed with the
-dying gasp of that righteous man, the venerable sire of his people, the
-renowned nonagenarian whom thou stealthily silenced on a bloody bed
-into the sleep of death for trying to save his flock from thy hyena
-jaws.
-
-An explosive bomb shattered the life of thy crowned opponent, (a
-noble life consecrated to the welfare of his people) but no chance or
-opportunity directed any explosive bomb to shatter thy cadaverous body.
-No jeweled pistol or secret dagger like the many that have dripped
-with the blood of thy victims in thy Yildiz Kiosk, found its way to
-thy treacherous heart. No poisoned cup of coffee like the countless
-cups brewed in thy palaces trickled down thy throat to end thy vampire
-existence.
-
-Thou hast lived! Protected from the Nemesis of thy crimes by the
-jealousies and rivalries of great powers which thou artfully played one
-against another; by the combined forces of religion and plunder which
-thou cunningly wielded into one. Even so thou livest! Peerless living
-example in the civilized twentieth century of the Triumph of Crime.
-
-
-
-
-L’AVENIR.
-
-
-In the foregoing pages I have directed my humble efforts to sketch out
-what the Powers of Europe have done in the past, and how their actions
-have reflected on my unfortunate race.
-
-It is considered good policy now by a certain class of European writers
-to ascribe all the horrors of the Armenian Massacres to Hamid the
-despot, to represent him as a tyrant as unassailable and unconquerable
-as he was implacable, in short as a sort of superhuman being who swept
-everything before him to the consummation of his own despotic will. The
-reason for this is not difficult to perceive. They would fain disavow
-the part Europe has played in the tragedy, and to do this successfully
-it becomes necessary also to present Turkey to the world now as a
-paradise (from whence the tyrant once removed) peopled only by saints
-and angels; so we have also many roseate colored word pictures of
-Constitutional Turkey.
-
-The murders, deportations and imprisonments of the Turkish
-revolutionaries, or more correctly reformers, were undoubtedly the sole
-work of Abdul Hamid and his palace clique, but Abdul and his minions
-could not have carried out that hellish work of wholesale extermination
-of the Armenians without the perpetration and participation of the
-Turkish people. It is true the massacres were originated and organized
-in the Palace, the Palace clique stirred up religious fanaticism and
-race hatred, but the co-operation of the people was necessary; and
-the people co-operated in order to plunder and enrich themselves with
-the worldly goods that the Armenians always knew how to acquire by
-their own industry and toil; the appeal to their marauding and bestial
-instincts met with a ready response. It was moreover easy work for a
-race of brigands, especially as their numbers exceeded their victims by
-about ten to one and who were practically unarmed.
-
-The first Armenian Massacres of Abdul Hamid were tentative; he began
-by feeling the pulse of Europe; he found that the six Signatories to
-the Treaty of Berlin accepted the situation, he was thus emboldened
-to carry out that long and awful list of horrors that stands without
-its parallel in history. Clearly it was in the power of Europe to have
-prevented both the massacres and all the agonizing sufferings that came
-in their train, but Europe took no preventive action.
-
-Let us ask the question, Who and what are these Turks, whom Europe for
-her own sordid ends has petted and pampered and helped and supported?
-and the answer comes with striking force to-day over the lapse of a
-century, in the words of one of England’s greatest sons: “I have never
-before heard that the Turkish Empire has been considered any part of
-the balance of Powers in Europe. They despise and contemn all Christian
-princes as infidels, and only wish to subdue and exterminate them and
-their people. What have these worse than savages to do with the Powers
-of Europe but to spread war, destruction, and pestilence among them?
-The Ministers and the policy which shall give these people any weight
-in Europe will deserve all the bans and curses of posterity.”[14]
-
-To-day the Powers of Europe are armed to the teeth. To-day they are
-groaning under the burden of armaments which they are increasing
-with breathless speed although the burden grows heavier. To-day all
-Europe is trembling lest the hell-hounds of war be let loose. Has
-any political student put his finger on the cause which began, the
-beginning and the source of the evil, the Alpha of the Omega. I have
-put my finger on it--the beginning and the source--The jealousies and
-rivalries of European Politics in the Turkish Empire. According to an
-Eastern proverb “The flies are always round the honey,” but sometimes
-the flies stick in the honey.
-
-Politicians of the Governments of Europe have said in the pride of
-their hearts “There is no God.” Particularly has this spirit of
-cynicism and heartlessness governed the actions of Russian politicians
-after the death of Alexander II. Since 1881, they have looked upon the
-extermination of the Armenians just as the pathfinder in a forest would
-look upon a dense forest growth, the clearing away of which would make
-out a path for him and lead to running streams and harvest fields. In
-the eyes of Russian politicians the unfortunate Armenians have been the
-forest growth which has stood in the way of their advance to the South
-and into Persia, and they have looked on with intense satisfaction at
-the exterminating process of the Turk, which they have regarded as
-the helping hand that clears away the difficulty confronting them.
-But precisely whether Russia can grow strong by the pouring out of
-Armenian blood, and whether her empire will be extended by their
-hellish extermination remains to be solved by the future. One thing,
-however, the history of the world points out, that iniquity ends, not
-in strength, but in dissolution; and “The wages of sin is death.”
-
-Politicians of Europe have, in the pride of their hearts, arrogated
-to themselves that power, which appertains to the Creator; they have
-imagined that they hold the world in the hollows of their hands, and
-the misery or happiness of millions of human beings has weighed as
-nothing in their estimation, against the interests of what they have
-designated “our sphere of influence,” but they have forgotten what they
-need to be reminded that the Creator is mightier than the creature and
-that the eternal law of heaven and earth changeth not for politicians.
-
- “And the First Morning of Creation wrote;
- What the Last Dawn of Reckoning shall read.”
-
-“Of old hast thou laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are
-the work of thy hands.
-
-“They shall perish, but thou shalt endure: yea, all of them shall wax
-old like a garment; as a vesture shalt thou change them, and they shall
-be changed. But thou art the same, and thy years shall have no end.”
-
-When the heavens and earth shall perish, shall wax old as a garment
-and be changed as a vesture; whence shall endure the power and
-principalities, the empires and spheres of influence of him who is
-called man?
-
-“As for man, his days are as grass; as a flower of the field, so he
-flourisheth. For the wind passeth over it, and it is gone; and the
-place thereof shall know it no more.”
-
-
-
-
-THE ORIGIN OF THE ARMENIANS--THE INTRODUCTION OF CHRISTIANITY INTO
-ARMENIA--DECLINE & GRAND REVIVAL.
-
-
-“God shall enlarge Japhet and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, and
-Canaan shall be his servant.”
-
-For the interpretation of this blessing of Noah’s to his eldest son,
-and of how it may or may not have met with its fulfilment, I shall
-leave to theologians to discuss, and only record it here as a quotation
-from Genesis. Beyond the story of his connection with the flood, and
-this blessing with which his father blessed him, and the genealogy
-of his sons, we read nothing more in Genesis, of Japhet, this mighty
-father of the Caucasian race.
-
-The genealogy in Genesis runs thus:
-
-“The sons of Japhet, Gomer and Magog and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal,
-and Meschech, and Tiras.
-
-“And the sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz and Riphath and Togarmah.
-
-“And the sons of Javan; Elishah and Tarshish, Kittim and Dodamin.
-
-“By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every
-one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.”
-
-Only the names of the three sons of Gomer, and the four sons of Javan
-are given in Genesis, and by these we are told were the isles of the
-Gentiles divided. So much for Genesis.
-
-Later history records that these Gentiles spread themselves over part
-of that stretch of terra firma which now goes by the name of Europe,
-developing their own families, and their own nations, and originating
-their own tongues, and also they spread themselves over other parts of
-the surface of the globe, populating where they could, ruling where
-they could.
-
-But through the roll of centuries which lost themselves into the flight
-of thousand years, one branch of the sons of Japhet kept themselves on
-the land where Noah planted his vineyard, and round the base of that
-mountain from whence his descendants began to spread and people the
-earth.
-
-Tradition has woven a romance round the names of towns and villages
-in Armenia. “No aighee” (Noah’s vineyard) is the name of a village
-supposed to be the place where the patriarch planted his vine; and
-“Nakhitchvan”[15] meaning (first descent) where Noah is supposed to
-have descended from the ark; also “Mairand” meaning (mother is there)
-where Noah’s wife is supposed to be buried; and “Erivan”[16] meaning
-(that which can be seen) supposed to be the land in the distance which
-could be seen when Noah descended from the ark.
-
-[Illustration: MINARET AT ERIVAN, ONE OF THE CITIES TRADITION ASCRIBES
-TO BE FOUNDED BY NOAH.]
-
-Armenian history begins with Haik, the first chief or king of the
-tribe: he was third in descent from Japhet, and fourth in descent from
-Noah, and his genealogy is given thus: Haik the son of Togarmah, the
-son of Gomer, the son of Japhet, the son of Noah.
-
-“They of the house of Togarmah traded in thy fairs with horses and
-horsemen and mules” is the designation given by Ezekiel, 27th chapter
-14th verse of the merchants of Armenia trading with Tyrus.
-
-Haik revolting from Belus, the Nimrod of Genesis, the son of Cush and
-grandson of Ham, retraced his footsteps from the plains of Shinar,
-where he with others had tried to build the tower whose top should
-reach into heaven, and with his followers and children settled himself
-round the base of Ararat.
-
-Perhaps a nascent fire of patriotism was burning in Haik’s heart as
-he retraced his steps to the land of his father’s or grandfather’s
-childhood: perhaps owing to the circumstances under which he was
-placed, he had not the alternative of another choice.
-
-We read in Armenian history that Belus sent the following message to
-Haik:
-
-“Why didst thou go to that cold country? Were it not better for thee to
-have moderated thy pride, and submissively dwelt on my territory in any
-part thou wished.”
-
-To which Haik replied:
-
-“It is better to die bravely than to bow down in fear to that
-presumptuous man who would be worshipped as a god.”
-
-Whatever causes may have influenced Haik, his choice of country was
-geographically most unfortunate for the race he founded, and it may
-truly be said that owing to its geographical conditions affording
-facilities for the march of conquerors, to have been instrumental in
-bringing about the overwhelming and unequalled adversities that through
-weary centuries have followed like a grim fate the footsteps of his
-descendants.
-
-No geographical position on the surface of the globe could have been
-more unfortunate, hemmed round by larger territories, with no natural
-defences or boundaries, and no outlet to the sea, except the lake of
-the Caspian on the one side, and the lake of the Black Sea on the
-other, that land on which Haik chose to found a country and a nation,
-has been soaked with the blood and the tears of this branch of the sons
-of Japhet.
-
-The animosity between Haik and Belus continued, and later, according to
-Armenian historians, Belus was slain in battle by an arrow from the bow
-of Haik.
-
-We read the following record of Belus in Genesis: “he began to be a
-mighty one in the earth.” “He was a mighty hunter before the Lord:
-wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord.”
-
-In Armenian history, Haik is depicted as a man of powerful physique
-and gigantic stature; no man of his time being able to bend his bow or
-shoot his arrow. Moses of Chorene, the chief of Armenian historians,
-quoting from the learned Syrian Mar Abbas, writes of him thus:
-
-“He was graceful and well built, curly haired, pleasing in appearance,
-and strong armed, and it might be remembered that among the heroes of
-his time he was the most remarkable of all.”
-
-However that may be, Armenian history awards to Haik the proud
-distinction of having overcome and slain Belus, the mighty hunter
-Nimrod.
-
-The people who retraced their steps from the plains of Shinar, and
-settled round the base of Ararat called themselves “Hai” after their
-chief, and they named their country “Haiyastan,” and these names still
-continue to be used in the Armenian, or “Haiyérane” as the Armenians
-call their own language.
-
-[Illustration: GREAT AND LITTLE ARARAT.]
-
-I will pass over the periods when the son and grandson of Haik ruled
-over Armenia, and only mention that the mountain known to the world
-as Ararat was called by the Hai “Masis” after their king Amasia and
-great-grandson of Haik. To this day, Armenian peasants and others
-dwelling round Ararat, call the mountain “Masis.” I remember in my
-childhood having seen an Armenian periodical entitled “Masis,” which
-showed that the name had been steadily kept up.
-
-I will again pass over the periods ruled by the successors of Amasia,
-and relate the story of King Aram, who ended his brilliant reign in
-B.C. 1796 after ruling over Armenia fifty-eight years.
-
-He was a great and powerful prince, and extended his dominions, and
-grew to be so mighty in battle that the neighbouring nations called
-his country Aramia and the people were called Aramians, such names as
-Armenia or Armenians being no doubt later corruptions.
-
-The first victory of Aram was over Neuchar king of Media, whom he took
-prisoner and put to death, and made a large part of the country of the
-defeated prince tributary to his own. The second victory of Aram was
-over Barsham king of Babylon, whom also he took prisoner and put to
-death. The next victory was over the king of Cappadocia; the army of
-the Cappadocians was pursued to the very shores of the Mediterranean,
-and the whole of Cappadocia fell into the hands of Aram B.C. 1796.
-Also Ninus king of Assyria, at one time an eager enemy, awed by the
-victories of Aram, sought to cultivate his friendship.
-
-No doubt if the volumes and scripts of paper or parchment of the famous
-Alexandrian library, which burned for six months as fuel in the four
-thousand baths of the city, had escaped that most atrocious act of
-vandalism, and been preserved instead, vast treasures of knowledge now
-lost to us concerning the ancient kingdoms of Western Asia might be
-known in our day; and also when the tide of Islam victory rolled over
-the kingdom of Armenia, how much of the story and history of the people
-was lost and destroyed along with the destruction of their independence
-it would be difficult now to calculate or assert, but in taking up
-link by link of whatever knowledge has been left to us, there seems
-to be grounds for supposing that the “Aramæans” designated by foreign
-writers as “a people of Semitic race, language and religion, coming
-from Northern Arabia and settling in the region between the western
-boundaries of Babylonia and the highlands of Western Asia” were no
-other than the Hai who under their King Aram had spread their conquests
-and their kingdom into Mesopotamia and even to the shores of the
-Mediterranean.
-
-Herodotus also rather corroborates this conjecture when he includes
-Northern Mesopotamia, together with the mountainous country of Ararat,
-under the name of Armenia, and in writing of the Armenian boats that
-brought merchandise to Babylon, he remarks that they were constructed
-in Armenia, _in the parts above Assyria_.
-
-Archæological researches have laid the claim that the modern Armenians
-are the descendants of the old Hittites; the modern Armenian being
-supposed to be the survival of the ancient Hittite tongue, and it
-is asserted almost everything that is known in the Hittite language
-is Old Armenian in form: but who these Hittites were, or whence they
-came neither historian nor archæologist have been able definitely to
-ascertain. In the Armenian version of the Bible, we find the name
-“Kethosi” used for the Hittite who were known to the Assyrians and
-Egyptians as “Ketha,” but this can have no important bearing since the
-Bible was translated into the Armenian language from the Greek in the
-fifth century of the Christian era, and the Armenian scribe no doubt
-simply translated what he found in the Greek.
-
-According, however, to all known history the Hittites were a warlike
-and conquering race and ranked among the foremost of the nations of
-Western Asia. The modern historian has come to the following conclusion
-concerning them: “Their primitive home is thought to have been in that
-part of Armenia where the Euphrates, the Halys, and Lycus approach
-nearest to one another; and it is even asserted that the modern
-Armenians are descendants of the old Hittites. From this point they
-began their career of conquests, probably under the leadership of
-some able and vigorous chief, whose ambition overleaped his native
-boundaries. One conquest led to another. Their leaders acquired great
-armies, and subdued many nations, until the Hittites became one of
-the most powerful peoples of ancient times, and their kings were able
-successfully to defy even Egypt, at that time the strongest nation on
-the globe.”
-
-This description accords with Armenian history; the Hai being known
-from time immemorial as a warlike race, and extending their territory
-by conquests, until, as I have narrated, under the leadership of Aram
-their kingdom spread from the mountains of Upper Armenia to the shores
-of the Mediterranean and into northern Mesopotamia, which proves that
-almost all of Asia Minor was conquered by them, and according also to
-Armenian history the language of the Hai was introduced into Cappadocia
-by King Aram.[17]
-
-Allowing, however, for the many obscurities of Armenian history,
-confusion comes in, when historians or archæologists ascribe a
-Mongolian ancestry to the Hittites, whereas Armenian history holds its
-unquestionable ground firmly and decidedly on the Japhetian ancestry;
-and the peculiar physiognomy of the Armenians; the oval contour of
-face, the distinctive, prominent nose, large eye, and well marked arch
-of eyebrow do not show any traces of Mongolian ancestry. It follows
-therefore that if the Armenians are the descendants of the Hittites,
-then the Hittites were not of Mongolian ancestry. If the Hittites were
-the Hai, the name must have undergone corruption during the course of
-centuries and it is reasonable to suppose that they shared the fate of
-all conquerors, and after a period of power, were driven back from the
-shores of the Mediterranean to their own native home.
-
-Aram was succeeded by his son Ara, a prince of such singular and
-surpassing beauty that he was surnamed “Ara the Beautiful.” The
-famous Semiramis, wife of Ninus king of Assyria, attracted by his
-great personal beauty offered him her affections and her throne after
-the death of her husband, but her proffers of love were scornfully
-rejected by Ara, who according to the story related of his own love
-was passionately attached to his queen Nuvard. The proud Semiramis,
-scorned, enraged and mortified, declared war against Ara and entered
-his country with her armies; a battle was fought in which Ara leading
-his army was slain, although Semiramis had given special instructions
-to her troops to be careful of his life and bring him to her a living
-prisoner.
-
-The death of Ara was evidently a grief to Semiramis, for she
-established his son Kardos on his father’s throne. She also built a
-town and fortress on the shores of Lake Aghthamar, now called Van,
-the battlefield on which the beautiful Ara pursued by her fatal love
-lost his life. The town and fortress were named “Semiramakert” meaning
-“built by Semiramis.”
-
-The name of the highest mountain in Armenia which the people of the
-country called “Masis” came to be known as Ararat, it is supposed to
-be derived from the Armenian words “Ara-i-jard” meaning “the defeat
-of Ara” or “the undoing of Ara.” If this version is correct, the name
-is likely to have been used in derision by the Assyrians. According
-to another version the name of Ara was converted into Ararat, and the
-country called after him. Thus we read in the account of the flood
-given in Genesis:
-
-“And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the
-month, upon the mountains of Ararat.”
-
-In the Armenian version of the bible, we read “on the twenty-seventh
-day of the month,” but likewise as in English “upon the mountains of
-Ararat.” This is not surprising since the designation “thaghavoroothune
-Araratian” meaning “the kingdom of Ararat” is in use in the Armenian
-language.
-
-I have alluded to the reigns of Aram and Ara to show how the Hai have
-come to be called Armenians and how their country has come to be
-named Armenia; also whence the name, Ararat; and as I purport here
-only to treat of the origin of the Armenians, I shall now pass on to
-the no less interesting period of their history: THE INTRODUCTION OF
-CHRISTIANITY.
-
-When that great event bearing the message “on earth peace, goodwill
-toward men” celebrated throughout the Christian world as the divine
-birth, took place in the city of Bethlehem; Abgar the son of Arsham
-reigned in Armenia.
-
-That country was now broken in strength, the severe blows dealt on the
-one side by the Roman Empire, and the incessant warfare of the Persian
-on the other, had greatly curtailed her former independence and power;
-the talons of the Roman Eagles were already felt in her vitals, and the
-king of Armenia subsisted under the favor of the Roman Emperor, whilst
-it became necessary for him to cultivate the friendship of his powerful
-neighbour, the king of Persia.
-
-Whilst in Persian territory, whither he had gone to settle the dispute
-that had arisen on the death of the Persian monarch between his sons,
-Abgar had contracted a severe disease, evidently leprosy.
-
-[Illustration: ABGAR KING OF ARMENIA.
-
-Converted to Christianity in A.D. 34. Baptised by the Apostle Thaddeus.]
-
-The wonderful cures and miracles of Christ were reported to him by the
-representatives he had sent to the Roman General Marinus in Jerusalem.
-These representatives had gone to refute the charges brought against
-him by King Herod, and to propitiate the Roman Power; they came back to
-tell what they had witnessed in Jerusalem, of the singular wisdom and
-wondrous works of a marvellous man named Jesus, who was of Nazareth,
-but whom his own followers persisted in calling the Son of God.
-
-The story relates that Abgar was deeply impressed by what he heard,
-and expressed his own belief that man could not do such wondrous
-works as were related of this Jesus the Nazarene. Thereupon the King
-sent messengers to Jerusalem with a letter to Jesus. What a touch of
-human nature is here displayed; the king is suffering from a loathsome
-disease, the medical skill of his country and of neighbouring countries
-has been exhausted, all in vain; the royal heart is stricken as well
-as the royal body, for his disease is so loathsome, that although he
-is king, his subjects would rather shun than approach him; he hears
-of this wonderful man Jesus, his representatives have come back from
-Jerusalem to tell him that “he cleanseth the lepers.” Hasten to him,
-said the king, take unto him my greetings, carry my messages and my
-letter and bring him unto me that I might honor him and if so be that
-he may heal me.
-
-The messengers of Abgar were headed by Anany the Greek scribe of the
-king and they are supposed to be present in the procession of Christ’s
-entry into Jerusalem. The twentieth and twenty-first verses of the
-Gospel of St. John are adduced by Armenian historians as corroborative
-testimony:
-
-“And there were certain Greeks among them that came up to worship at
-the feast;
-
-“The same came therefore to Philip, which was of Bethsaida of Galilee,
-and desired him, saying, Sir, we would see Jesus.”
-
-Anany and his companions are supposed to be the “certain Greeks” who
-came to Philip asking to see Jesus. And here I have to explain that the
-letters of the Armenian alphabet were invented by St. Mesrope in the
-beginning of the fifth century of the christian era; previous to the
-time of Mesrope there were no special Armenian letters, and as this
-invention was hailed as a signal national boon we have to conclude that
-there was no written Armenian language previous to the fifth century.
-One thing however must be certain, that this letter carried by the
-king’s Greek scribe, the leader of the messengers, must originally have
-been written in Greek. This letter has already been translated from the
-Armenian into English; the translation reads thus:
-
-“Abgar the son of Arsham, Prince of Armenia, sends to Thee, Saviour and
-Benefactor, Jesus, who didst perform miracles in Jerusalem, greeting.
-
-“I have heard of Thee, and of the cures wrought by Thee without herbs
-or medicines; for it is reported that Thou restoreth the blind and
-maketh the lame walk, cleanseth the lepers, casteth out devils and
-unclean spirits, and healeth those that are tormented of diseases of
-long continuance, and that Thou also raiseth the dead:--hearing all
-this of Thee I was fully persuaded that Thou art the very God come down
-from heaven to do such miracles, or that Thou art the Son of God and
-so performeth them; wherefore I write to Thee to entreat Thee to take
-the trouble to come to me and cure my disease. Besides, I hear that the
-Jews murmur against Thee and want to torture Thee. I have a small and
-beautiful city--sufficient for us both.”
-
-The story goes on to relate that among the messengers was an artist by
-the name of John who had been commissioned by the king to bring back a
-portrait of Christ; the artist however failed in his efforts to portray
-the divine features, whereupon Christ gave him a veil which he had laid
-to his face and on which his features had become imprinted, to carry
-back to his master.
-
-We are also told that the apostle Thomas was commanded by Christ to
-write a reply to Abgar. The reply has also been translated into English
-and the translation reads thus:
-
-“Blessed is he who believes in Me without seeing Me, for it is written
-of Me that they that see Me shall not believe, and they that have not
-seen Me shall believe and be saved. As concerning the request that I
-should come to thee, it becomes Me to fulfil all things for which I was
-sent, and when I have fulfilled those then I shall ascend to Him that
-sent me; but after my Ascension I will send one of my disciples, who
-shall cure thee of thy disease and give life to thee and to all those
-that are with thee.”
-
-Two stories are given of the cure of Abgar. According to one version he
-was healed on receiving the veil, according to the other, the apostle
-Thaddeus on coming to Armenia laid his hands on the king and cured him.
-
-This story of the veil has been treated by certain scholars as a
-legend, especially as the Roman church has also got a somewhat similar
-story. We are of course not in a position to vouch for its truth
-or incorrectness, but it seems to me if all the miracles of Christ
-as related in the gospels are to be credited, this one also can be
-regarded as one out of many. If according to the gospel story water
-was turned into wine at the marriage feast in Cana, what is there
-incredible about the imprint of the divine features on a veil; and
-if the gospels assure us of the healing of many lepers there can be
-nothing astonishing in the healing of the king of Armenia.
-
-I was however much interested when I came across the following passage
-in the history of the “Spread of Islam”:
-
-“To the east they advanced to the banks and sources of the Euphrates
-and Tigris; the long disputed barrier of Rome and Persia was forever
-confounded; the walls of Edessa and Amida, of Dara and Nisibis, which
-had resisted the arms and engines of Sapor or Nushirvan, were levelled
-in the dust; and the holy city of Abgarus might vainly produce the
-epistle or the image of Christ to an unbelieving conqueror.”
-
-“The long disputed barrier of Rome and Persia” which was “forever
-confounded” was of course Armenia; and “the holy city of Abgarus” the
-historian evidently had in his mind must have been Edessa, whither
-Abgar had removed his seat of government. To Armenians, however,
-Edessa has never been “the holy city,” if they had a holy city, they
-would prefer to name Ani, the city of a thousand churches, or on
-account of its peculiar associations Etchmiatzin the ecclesiastical
-metropolis.
-
-It was in Anno Domini 34 that the apostles Thaddeus and Bartholomew
-went to Armenia, where they were warmly welcomed and received with
-great reverence and respect by the King, who accepted the christian
-faith at once, himself and the royal household being baptised by the
-apostle Thaddeus.
-
-Thaddeus and Bartholomew continued their preaching in Armenia,
-converting and baptising the people; churches were raised up, bishops
-consecrated, and the christian religion established in the country.
-
-It might have been a matter of wonder to us why Saint Paul did not
-address an epistle to the Armenians as he addressed to other nations;
-but I think the 20th verse of the 15th chapter of his epistle to the
-Romans clearly explains the reason why there was not an epistle written
-to the Armenians also:
-
-“Yea, so have I strived to preach the Gospel, not where Christ was
-named, lest I should build upon another man’s foundation.”
-
-Clearly then no epistle was written to the Armenians because Christ
-was already named among them, and Paul did not wish to build upon the
-foundation of Thaddeus and Bartholomew who had laid the foundation of
-Christianity in Armenia at a time when Paul himself was persecuting
-Christians. Thaddeus and Bartholomew left behind no epistles, and we
-have only Armenian history for the record of the work they did in
-Armenia.
-
-Abgar died soon after his baptism and conversion, and was succeeded
-by his son Anany who tried to revive the old religion, which was
-something similar to the worship of the Greeks and Romans. The people
-of the country however had in large part accepted Christianity, and
-the revival of the old religion was consequently met with disfavour,
-but before their discontent had time to assume active tendencies Anany
-met his death by an accident; the people thereupon immediately invited
-Abgar’s nephew Sanatrook to occupy the throne, taking a pledge from
-him that he would not interfere with their religion. The pledge was
-readily given by Sanatrook, but once secure on the throne he proved a
-cruel and merciless despot: the remaining sons of Abgar were killed,
-and his daughters and widow Helena banished, but the crowning act of
-the tyrant’s wickedness and infamy was the martyrdom of the apostles
-Thaddeus and Bartholomew. Thus Christianity continued its struggles in
-Armenia, persecuted and declining, but still enduring.
-
-About Anno Domini 260 the king reigning in Armenia by the name of
-Terdat, persecuted Christianity. He had regained his throne through the
-support of the Roman Army, and to celebrate his accession he offered
-thanksgiving and sacrifice in the temple of the goddess Anahid, which
-was no other than the goddess Diana of the Romans, but the fathers of
-the Armenian church in their christian zeal have reversed the name of
-the goddess, made a topsy-turvy of it, calling her Anahid, and so the
-name has remained in the Armenian language to this day.
-
-This occasion of the king’s worship and thanksgiving in the temple of
-Diana, marked the beginning of the persecution of Gregory, afterwards
-known as Gregory the Illuminator and the patron saint of Armenia. The
-childhood of Gregory had been shadowed by a parent’s guilt: his father
-Anak having treacherously assassinated the then reigning king Khosrov
-the Great, the whole family was exterminated, only two sons escaping
-death, one of them, Gregory, was secretly removed by his nurse to
-Caesaria, and kept in concealment, until in the course of years the
-father’s crime having been forgotten, all danger for the life of the
-son was supposed to have passed away.
-
-[Illustration: SOORB GREGORE LOOSAVORITCH.
-
-(St. Gregory the Illuminator)
-
-Patron Saint of Armenia. Revived Christianity in Armenia in A.D. 276.]
-
-Gregory’s christian faith however now became the cause of his
-misfortunes; the king called upon Gregory to assist in the worship
-in the temple of Diana, but he firmly refused and boldly avowed his
-christianity, which so incensed the king that he ordered frightful
-tortures to be inflicted upon him, but as the tortures had no effect
-and Gregory remained firm to his faith, the king ordered him to be
-thrown into a dry well. The story goes on to relate that Gregory lived
-for fifteen years in this dry well, food and drink being conveyed to
-him secretly by a woman, herself a christian. On this spot is built the
-famous monastery of “Khorvirap” meaning “deep well.”
-
-A beautiful Roman maiden by the name of Rhipsimè fleeing from the
-addresses of the Emperor Diocletian sought refuge in Armenia; she
-was accompanied by a friend, a woman of maturer years of the name of
-Caiana, and some other christian maidens, all fleeing from persecution
-in Rome.
-
-Rhipsimè’s rare beauty had captivated the Roman emperor, and she had
-sought to escape from his passion by flight, but a crueller fate
-awaited her in Armenia, for king Terdat in his turn smitten by the
-exquisite beauty of her face offered to make her his queen, and her
-refusal to accept his throne and his love so exasperated the king that
-he ordered her beautiful head to be cut off. Thus Rhipsimè with Caiana
-and their young companions were cruelly martyred. Rhipsimè and Caiana
-were later beatified as saints in the Armenian church.
-
-The king however did not escape the Nemesis of his diabolical crime,
-the memory of the beautiful Rhipsimè haunted him; remorse took the
-place of the ferocious anger that had doomed his hapless victim to
-her cruel death and the king lost his reason. The king having become
-incapacitated, Gregory was released from his underground prison by the
-king’s sister Khosrovidookt, and as the malady of the king was mental,
-remorse for his own crime having overturned his reason, it became
-the peculiar office of Gregory to minister to the king, and by his
-spiritual ministrations to effect the restoration of the royal mind.
-
-Terdat recovered his reason and as a broken-hearted penitent accepted
-the religion of Gregory and the beautiful Rhipsimè.
-
-Gregory now freely preached Christianity in Armenia. It was a grand
-Revival; the temples of Anahid were turned into the churches of
-Christ, and the whole nation accepted Christianity, which became the
-established religion in the country.[18] The name of Gregory has been
-handed down to posterity as Soorb Gregore Loosavoritch (Saint Gregory
-the Illuminator). “Illuminator” is the generally accepted English
-translation of the Armenian term “Loosavoritch,” but it is true
-nevertheless that neither the term “Illuminator” nor “Enlightener”
-suitably conveys the definition of its meaning; sometimes modes
-of expression are so difficult to translate from one language into
-another, and it can be said that the term “Illuminator” is used for
-want of a better word in English. The Armenians call their religion
-“loois havat;” the word “loois” means “light” and “havat” means “faith”
-or “religion,” but if I translated the two words as “enlightened faith”
-or “enlightened religion” the translation would not suitably convey the
-meaning of the original.
-
-[Illustration: THE CATHEDRAL OF ETCHMIATZIN.
-
-(Only Begotten Descended).
-
-Seat of the Supreme Patriarch. The foundation stone was laid by St.
-Gregory the Illuminator who built the Church in the third century of
-the Christian era.]
-
-The cathedral of Etchmiatzin is identified with Gregory; its name
-“Etchmiatzin” means in the Armenian language “the only begotten is
-descended,” and the story attached to it is, that in a vision Christ
-appeared to Gregory descended in light; Gregory built his church on
-the spot where the vision had appeared to him, giving it the name of
-“Etchmiatzin” (only begotten descended). The cathedral also gives its
-name to the town Etchmiatzin, the ecclesiastical metropolis of Armenia.
-
-Since the time of Gregory, Christianity has been the national religion
-of the Armenians, and they have clung to their christian faith through
-unremitting persecutions and martyrdoms such as no other christian
-people have been called upon to endure.
-
-The cathedral of Etchmiatzin built by Gregory still stands to-day; it
-has constantly been repaired and rebuilt in some part or other, until
-perhaps little of the original building may be left, but it still
-claims to be the church built by the patron saint of Armenia. I shall
-here quote a passage from “Historical Sketch of the Armenian Church,”
-written by an Armenian priest:
-
-“Owing to political circumstances the Armenian Patriarchate had at
-times to be transferred to metropolises and to other principal towns of
-Armenia. In the year A.D. 452 it was removed to Dwin, in 993 to Ani, in
-1114 to Rômklah, and in 1294 to Sis. The Kingdom of Cilicia becoming
-extinct, and, we having no more a kingdom and no longer a capital town,
-it was natural and proper to re-transfer the See to its own original
-place, as the entire nation unanimously desired it. Accordingly, in the
-year 1441, it was decided by an ecclesiastical meeting that the seat
-of the Catholicus should return to Holy Etchmiatzin, where to this day
-has been preserved the proper unbroken succession from our Apostles and
-from our holy Father, St. Gregory the Illuminator.”
-
-I read the other day in one of the foreign papers published in Japan,
-the following piece of news:
-
-“An Armenian Church pronounced by experts to date from the second
-century of the Christian era, has been discovered in a fair state of
-preservation in the neighbourhood of Bash-Aparnah.”
-
-Perhaps the excavations in Armenia which Professor Marr is now
-conducting might lead to throwing more light on Armenian history.
-
-
-
-
-FOOTNOTES
-
-
-[1] In a recent publication “Fifty Years in Constantinople,” the
-author Dr. George Washburn, ex-President of Robert College, estimates
-the number that were slaughtered in cold blood in the streets of the
-city as 10,000. Dr. Washburn adds the following: “The massacre of the
-Armenians came to an end on Friday, the day after the soldiers came
-to the College; but the persecution of them which went on for months
-was worse than the massacre. Their business was destroyed, they were
-plundered and blackmailed without mercy, they were hunted like wild
-beasts, they were imprisoned, tortured, killed, deported, fled the
-country, until the Armenian population of the city was reduced by some
-seventy-five thousand, mostly men, including those massacred.”
-
-[2] “Transcaucasia and Ararat: Twenty Years of the Armenian
-Question.”--JAMES BRYCE.
-
-[3] “Our Responsibilities For Turkey.”--Argyll (note to 2nd printing).
-
-[4] In 1826 the Russian General Paskevitch defeated the Persians at
-Elizabetopol and in the following year 1827 he seized the monastery of
-Etchmiatzin (the seat of the Armenian Patriarch) and Erivan one of the
-great towns of Armenia and gained for himself the title of Erivanski.
-By these successes Russia advanced as far as the line of the Araxes and
-wrested from Persia the provinces of Erivan and Nakhitchvan. The Treaty
-of Peace was concluded between Russia and Persia at Turkmantchai on the
-22nd of February 1828.--Note to 2nd printing.
-
-[5] Commenting on the effect on Abdul Hamid of the indignation aroused
-in England over the massacres, Mr. James Bryce writes, “The indignation
-expressed in England exasperated him; he passed from fear to fury, and
-back again to fear; and went so far as to beg, and obtain, the friendly
-offices of the Pope, who, through the Government of Spain, asked the
-British Government not to press too hardly upon the Sultan with regard
-to the Armenians.”--Note to 2nd printing.
-
-[6] “Transcaucasia and Ararat: Twenty Years of the Armenian
-Question.”--James Bryce. Note to 2nd printing.
-
-[7] “Abdul Hamid Intime,” Georges Dorys. In the Preface by Pierre
-Guillard to the same book, there occurs the following passage:
-“Gladstone dénonça le Grand Assassin; M. Albert Vandal flétrit le
-Sultan Rouge; M. Anatole France fit trembler dans l’antre de Yildiz le
-Despote fou d’épouvante et d’autres le traitèrent de Bête Rouge et de
-Sultan blême.
-
-“Cependant aucun de ces termes excessifs en apparence n’est encore
-satisfaisant et n’exprime en toute son horreur le caractère d’un être à
-face humaine, tel, disait récemment un haut exilé ottoman, qu’il n’en
-existe point de semblable, qu’il n’en a jamais existé de pareil et
-que selon toute probabilité, il n’en pourra dans l’avenir exister un
-second. Les conquérants assyriens qui se vantent dans des inscriptions
-lapidaires d’avoir exterminé les peuples rebelles et tendu de peaux
-écorchées les murailles des villes prises, Néron, Caligula, Timour,
-Gengiz Khan, les inquisiteurs catholiques et les tortionnaires chinois,
-aucun tueur d’hommes n’égala Abdul-Hamid.”--Note to 2nd printing.
-
-[8] “Abdul Hamid Intime,” Georges Dorys.--Note to 2nd printing.
-
-[9] Nicholas C. Adossides [Youngest Son of Adossides Pasha] in the
-“Cosmopolitan” for July, 1909, (“Abdul the Dethroned”) writes as
-follows:
-
-“I remember the following incident which depicts the official Russian
-attitude: One night, while dining at the Russian legation in Bern,
-Switzerland, many Russian officials being present, the conversation
-was directed to the ever-engrossing Eastern question. A diplomat from
-St. Petersburg expressed his admiration of Abdul Hamid, praising
-his extraordinary intelligence and diplomatic skill. ‘Besides,’ he
-continued, ‘he is not so black as his enemies have painted him.’
-
-“Not being able to restrain my indignation at this, I protested, saying
-he was an arch assassin. ‘Not to speak of his innumerable cruelties and
-many villainies,’ I said, ‘can you deny, Sir, that he instigated and
-accomplished the annihilation of 360,000 Armenians?’
-
-“The admirer of the Sultan smiled, but before he could answer me, the
-military attaché of the legation, who was sitting next to me, exclaimed:
-
-“If you condemn the Sultan for that, you astonish me. The Armenians?
-Bah! They ought to be exterminated _en masse_, and the Sultan did an
-excellent piece of work when he got rid of them. I have no use for
-them. Besides,’ he continued, ‘can’t you see that a free Armenia would
-be a serious obstacle to Russian expansion and to our advance to the
-south and into Persia? Abdul Hamid has proved himself a very valuable
-ally of Russia. He is the best Ambassador at Constantinople that we’ve
-ever had.”--Note to 2nd printing.
-
-[10] This statement is corroborated by Dr. George Washburn in his
-account of the Constantinople Massacre: “But the Concert of Europe
-did nothing. It accepted the situation. The Emperor of Germany
-went further. He sent a special embassy to present to the Sultan a
-portrait of his family as a token of his esteem.”--“Fifty Years in
-Constantinople,” George Washburn. (Note to 2nd printing.)
-
-[11] Since these lines were written later accounts show that over
-a hundred thousand have been precipitated into homelessness and
-destitution, and this misery is growing greater every day.--Note to 2nd
-printing.
-
-[12] “Transcaucasia and Ararat: Twenty Years of the Armenian Question,”
-James Bryce.--Note to 2nd printing.
-
-[13] “The Strenuous Life: Expansion and Peace,” Theodore
-Roosevelt.--Note to 2nd printing.
-
-[14] Edmund Burke--Speech in Parliament in opposition to Mr. Pitt,
-1791.--Note to 2nd printing.
-
-[15] Nakhitchvan--Invaded and seized by the Persian Monarch Shah Abbas
-in 1603. Taken from Persia by Russia in 1827.
-
-[16] Erivan--Invaded and seized by the Persian monarch Shah Abbas in
-1603. Taken from Persia by Russia 1827.
-
-[17] The Hittites flourished in the sixteenth and fifteenth centuries
-B.C. King Aram completed his conquest of Cappadocia in B.C. 1796.
-
-[18] The orthodox church of Armenia is the church founded by Gregory.
-Since the loss of their independence, persecution has scattered and
-dispersed the people, thousands fleeing from their native home sought
-refuge in other countries and in some cases they or their descendants
-have come under the influence of other churches; thus the Mukhitharian
-monks of the monastery of St. Lazar in Venice have been drawn into
-the Romish Church and their influence has been extended over a small
-minority of laymen; also the influence of the American Missionaries in
-Asiatic Turkey has drawn others into Protestantism, but the bulk of
-the nation has remained Gregorians. It is well to remark here however
-that the orthodox Church, although calling herself “The Holy Catholic
-and Apostolic Church” has devoted her energies mainly to upholding the
-essential principles of Christianity and has not concerned herself
-much about dogmas. As for the modern Armenians of the Gregorian Church
-their religious views are characterized by liberalism, they look to the
-central figure of Christianity and regard dogmas as immaterial: their
-jealousy of their church is only actuated by the passionate feeling of
-preserving nationalism. They regard their church as the ark in which
-nationalism may be preserved until the dawn of better days.
-
-[Illustration]
-
-明治四十三年五月廿二日印刷
-
-明治四十三年五月廿五日發行
-
-著作兼
-
-發行者
-
-印刷者
-
-印刷所
-
-神奈川縣横濱市山手町二百二十番地
-
-ダイアナ・アガベッグ・アプカー
-
-神奈川縣横濱市山下町十番地
-
-エス・エッチ・ソマートン
-
-神奈川縣横濱市山下町十番地
-
-ジャパン・ガゼット新聞社
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Betrayed Armenia, by Diana Agabeg Apcar
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BETRAYED ARMENIA ***
-
-***** This file should be named 53170-0.txt or 53170-0.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/5/3/1/7/53170/
-
-Produced by Cindy Horton and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-