summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/67073-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/67073-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/67073-0.txt9900
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 9900 deletions
diff --git a/old/67073-0.txt b/old/67073-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 33b233f..0000000
--- a/old/67073-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,9900 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg eBook of Our Humble Helpers, by Jean-Henri
-Fabre
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
-will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before
-using this eBook.
-
-Title: Our Humble Helpers
- Familiar Talks on the Domestic Animals
-
-Author: Jean-Henri Fabre
-
-Release Date: January 2, 2022 [eBook #67073]
-
-Language: English
-
-Produced by: Jeroen Hellingman and the Online Distributed Proofreading
- Team at https://www.pgdp.net/ for Project Gutenberg (This
- file was produced from images generously made available by
- The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)
-
-*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK OUR HUMBLE HELPERS ***
-
-
-
-
-
- OUR HUMBLE HELPERS
-
- FAMILIAR TALKS ON
- THE DOMESTIC ANIMALS
-
-
- BY
- JEAN-HENRI FABRE
- Author of “The Story Book of Science,”
- “Social Life in the Insect World,” etc.
-
- TRANSLATED FROM THE FRENCH
- BY
- FLORENCE CONSTABLE BICKNELL
-
-
- NEW YORK
- THE CENTURY CO.
- 1918
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE
-
-
-In its purpose and style this book closely resembles the same author’s
-“Story-Book of Science,” and it belongs to the same series. To many
-readers, however, it is likely to prove even more interesting than its
-predecessor, inasmuch as the domestic animals are more familiar and
-hence more interesting to many persons than the ant, the spider, the
-plant-louse, the caterpillar, and other examples of insect life
-discussed in the earlier work. Particularly at this time, when not a
-few of us, both old and young, are turning our attention, however
-inexpertly, to farming in a small way, in order to make the most of
-nature’s food resources within our reach, we like to become a little
-better acquainted with the denizens of the farmyard and the four-footed
-helpers in the field. The pig and the hen, the goose and the turkey,
-the ox and the ass, the horse and the cow, the sheep and its canine
-keeper—these and many other old friends of ours in the animal kingdom
-are made to enliven the following pages by the genius and skill of him
-who knew and loved them all as few naturalists have known and loved
-their dumb fellow-creatures.
-
-Faithfulness to the spirit of the French original has throughout been
-striven for rather than a blind subservience to the letter. May the
-attempt to render at least a little of the charm of that original be
-found not wholly unsuccessful!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS
-
-
- CHAPTER PAGE
-
- I The Cock and the Hen 3
- II The Gizzard 9
- III The Chief Kinds of Poultry 16
- IV The Egg 21
- V The Egg (Continued) 27
- VI Incubation 36
- VII The Young Chickens 47
- VIII The Poulard 54
- IX The Turkey 61
- X The Guinea-Fowl 73
- XI The Palmipedes 84
- XII The Duck 94
- XIII The Wild Goose 108
- XIV The Domestic Goose 120
- XV The Pigeon 130
- XVI A Story from Audubon 141
- XVII A Supposition 150
- XVIII A Fragment of History 159
- XIX The Jackal 173
- XX The Chief Breeds of Dogs 183
- XXI The Chief Breeds of Dogs (Continued) 193
- XXII The Various Uses of Dogs 204
- XXIII The Eskimo Dog 213
- XXIV The Dog of Montargis 221
- XXV Hydrophobia 227
- XXVI The Cat 239
- XXVII Sheep 255
- XXVIII The Goat 271
- XXIX The Ox 279
- XXX Milk 293
- XXXI Butter 298
- XXXII Rennet 303
- XXXIII Cheese 308
- XXXIV The Pig 316
- XXXV Pig’s Measles 329
- XXXVI A Persistent Parasite 334
- XXXVII The Horse 343
- XXXVIII The Horse (Continued) 354
- XXXIX The Ass 362
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-OUR HUMBLE HELPERS
-
-
-CHAPTER I
-
-THE COCK AND THE HEN
-
-
-Under the big elm tree in the garden Uncle Paul has called together for
-the third time his usual listeners, Emile, Jules, and Louis. After the
-story of the Ravagers, which destroy our harvests, and that of the
-Auxiliaries, which protect them, he now proposes to tell the story of
-our Humble Helpers, the domestic animals. He thus begins:
-
-“The cock and the hen, those invaluable members of our poultry-yards,
-came to us from Asia so long ago that the remembrance of their coming
-is lost. At the present day they have spread to all parts of the world.
-
-“Is it necessary to describe the cock to you? Who has not admired this
-fine bird, with its bright look, its proud bearing, its slow and sedate
-walk? On its head a piece of scarlet flesh forms a scalloped crest;
-under the base of the beak hang two wattles resembling pieces of coral;
-on each temple, by the side of the ear, is a spot of dull white naked
-skin; a rich tippet of golden red falls from the neck over the
-shoulders and breast; two feathers of a greenish metallic luster form a
-graceful arch of plumage in the upper part of the tail. The heel is
-armed with a horny spur, hard and pointed; a formidable weapon with
-which, in fighting, the cock stabs his rival to death. His song is a
-resonant peal that makes itself heard at all hours, night as well as
-day. Hardly does the sky begin to brighten with the twilight of dawn
-when, erect on his perch, he awakens the nocturnal echoes with his
-piercing cock-a-doodle-doo, the reveille of the farm.”
-
-“That,” said Emile, “is the song I like so much to hear in the morning
-when I am about half-way between sleeping and waking.”
-
-“It is the cock’s crowing,” put in Louis, “that wakes me up in the
-morning when I have to go to market in the next town.”
-
-“The cock is the king of the poultry-yard,” resumed Uncle Paul. “Full
-of care for his hens, he leads them, protects them, scolds and punishes
-them. He watches over those that wander off, goes in quest of the
-vagrants, and brings them back with little cries of impatience, which,
-no doubt, are admonitions. If necessary, a peck with the beak persuades
-the more refractory. But if he finds food, such as grain, insects, or
-worms, he straightway lifts up his voice and calls the hens to the
-banquet. He himself, however, magnificent and generous, stands in the
-midst of the throng and scratches the earth to turn up the worms and
-distribute here and there to the invited guests the dainties thus
-unearthed. If some greedy hen takes more than her share, he recalls her
-to a sense of her duty to the community and reprimands her with a peck
-on the head. After all the others have eaten their fill he contents
-himself with their leavings.
-
-“Plainer in costume, the hen, the joy of the farmer’s wife, trots about
-the poultry-yard, scratching and pecking and cackling. After laying an
-egg she proclaims her joy with an enthusiasm in which her companions
-take such a share that the whole establishment bursts into a general
-lively chorus in celebration of the happy event. She has a habit of
-squatting down in a dusty and sunny corner where she flutters her wings
-with much content and makes a fine shower fall between her feathers to
-relieve the itching that torments her. Then with outstretched leg and
-wing she sleeps away the hottest hours of the day; or, without
-disturbing her voluptuous repose, spying a fly on the wall, she snaps
-it up with one quick dart of her beak. Like the cock, she swallows fine
-gravel, which takes the place of teeth and serves to grind the grain in
-her gizzard. She drinks by lifting her head skyward to make each
-mouthful go down. She sleeps on one leg, the other drawn up under her
-plumage and her head hidden under her wing.”
-
-“These curious particulars of the hen’s habits,” said Jules, “are quite
-familiar to us all; we see them every day with our own eyes. One only
-is new to me: hens, you say, swallow little grains of sand which take
-the place of teeth for grinding the food in the gizzard. I don’t know
-what the gizzard is, and I don’t see how little stones that have been
-swallowed can be used as teeth.”
-
-“A short digression on the digestive organs of birds,” replied Uncle
-Paul, “will give you the information you ask for.
-
-“Birds do not chew their food; they swallow it just as they seize it,
-or nearly so. The beak, lacking teeth, is for that very reason unsuited
-for the work of grinding. It merely seizes; it strikes, picks up, digs,
-pierces, breaks, tears, according to the kind of food adapted to the
-bird’s needs. A solid horn covers the bony framework of the two
-mandibles and makes their edges sharp and very well fitted for
-dismembering if necessary, but not for triturating.
-
-“Rapacious birds that feed on live prey have the upper mandible short,
-strong, hooked, and terminating in a sharp point, sometimes with
-serrate edges. With this weapon the hunting bird kills its prey, and
-tears it to pieces while holding it with its vigorous talons armed with
-sharp, curved nails.
-
-“Fish-eating birds that tear the fish to pieces in order to swallow it
-have the hooked beak of the rapacious birds; those that swallow the
-fish whole have a straight beak with long, wide mandibles. Some throw
-it into the air to catch it in their beak a second time, head first,
-and swallow it without any difficulty in spite of the fin-bones, which
-lie flat from front to back while the fish is passing through the
-narrow gullet. A great fishing bird, the pelican, has in its lower
-mandible a large membranous pouch, a sort of fish-pond, where it stores
-the fish as long as the catch lasts. Thus stocked up, it seeks a quiet
-retreat on some ledge of rock by the water-side and takes out, one by
-one, the fish packed away in its pouch, to feed on them at leisure.”
-
-“The pelican seems to me a wise fisher,” remarked Emile. “Without
-losing a minute in swallowing, it begins by filling the bag under its
-beak. The time will come later for looking over the catch and enjoying
-the fish at leisure. I should like to see it on its rocks with its bag
-full.”
-
-“And that other one,” said Jules, “that throws the fish it has caught
-into the air so as to catch it again head first and not strangle when
-swallowing it—is not that one just as clever?”
-
-“Each kind has its special talent,” replied Uncle Paul, “which it uses
-with the tool peculiar to the bird, the beak. If the story of the
-auxiliaries, related some time ago, is still fresh in your minds, you
-will remember that insect-eating birds have the beak slender and
-sometimes very long, to dig into the fissures of dead wood and bark;
-but those that catch insects on the fly, as the swallow and the
-fern-owl, have the beak very short and exceedingly wide, so that the
-game pursued is caught in the open gullet and becomes coated with a
-slimy saliva which holds it fast. Finally, I will remind you of the
-granivorous birds—the sparrow, linnet, greenfinch, chaffinch, and many
-others. All these birds, whose chief food consists of grain, have the
-beak short, thick, pointed; adapted, in fact, to the picking up of
-seeds from the ground, freeing them from their husks, and breaking
-their shells to obtain the kernel. By virtue of its strong mandibles,
-the beak of the hen belongs to this last category, although at the same
-time its rather long, sharp, and slightly hooked extremity indicates
-carnivorous tastes. Such a beak calls not only for seeds, but also for
-small prey, such as insects and worms.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER II
-
-THE GIZZARD
-
-
-“Nearly all the higher or mammiferous animals,” Uncle Paul continued,
-“such as the dog, cat, wolf, horse, have only one digestive pouch—a
-stomach—where the alimentary substances are dissolved and made fluid,
-so as to enter the veins and be turned into blood, by which all parts
-of the body are nourished. But the ox, goat, and sheep—the cud-chewers,
-in short—have four digestive cavities, which I will tell you about
-later. I will tell you how, in the pasture, these animals hastily
-swallow almost unchewed grass and put it by in a large reservoir called
-a paunch, from which it comes up again afterward in a season of repose,
-to be rechewed at leisure in small mouthfuls.
-
-“Well, birds are fashioned in a similar way, as far as eating is
-concerned. Not being able to chew, as they have no teeth, they swallow
-their food without any preparation, nearly as the beak has seized it,
-and amass a quantity of it in a spacious stomach, just as the ox does
-in his paunch. From this reservoir the food passes, little by little,
-into two other digestive cavities, one of which immerses it in a liquid
-calculated to dissolve it, and the other grinds and triturates it
-better than the best pair of jaws could do. There takes place a kind of
-chewing, it is true, only the food, instead of returning to the beak,
-where teeth are lacking for its thorough mastication, continues its
-journey, and on the way comes to the triturating machine. Birds, then,
-are generally provided with three digestive cavities.
-
-“The first is the crop, situated just at the base of the neck. It is a
-bag with thin and flexible walls, its size proportioned to the
-resistant nature of the food eaten. It is very large in birds that feed
-on grain, especially the hen, and is medium-sized, or even wholly
-wanting, in those that live on prey, which is much easier to digest
-than dry and hard seeds. In the crop, the food swallowed in haste
-remains hours and even days, as in a reservoir; there it softens
-somewhat, and is then submitted to the action of the other digestive
-pouches. The crop corresponds in a certain sense to the bag in which
-the pelican stores up his fishing; it represents also the first stomach
-of the ox and the other cud-chewers or ruminants.
-
-“Next to the crop is a second enlargement, called the succenturiate
-ventricle, of small capacity but remarkable for a liquid of a bitter
-taste that oozes in fine drops through its walls and moistens the food
-as it passes. This liquid is a digestive juice; it has the property of
-dissolving the alimentary substances as soon as trituration has done
-the greater part of the work. The food does not remain in this second
-stomach; it merely passes through to become impregnated with the
-digestive juice.
-
-“The third and last stomach is known as the gizzard. It is rounded and
-is slightly flattened on both sides, like a watch-case, and is
-composed—especially in birds that live on grain—of a very thick, fleshy
-wall, lined on the inside with a kind of hard and tenacious leather
-which protects the organ from attrition. Finally, it is to be noted
-that at the same time the bird is swallowing grain it takes care also
-to swallow a little gravel, some very small stones which, away down in
-the gizzard, will perform the office of teeth.”
-
-“I know what the gizzard is,” volunteered Emile. “When they are
-cleaning a chicken to cook, they take out of the body something round
-that they split in two with a knife; then they throw away a thick skin
-all wrinkled and stuffed with grains of sand, and the rest is put back
-into the chicken.”
-
-“Yes, that is the gizzard,” said Uncle Paul. “Let us complete these
-ideas got from cooking. The bird, not having in its beak the molars
-necessary for grinding, as in a mill, the seeds that are hard to crush,
-supplies its gizzard with artificial teeth, which are renewed at each
-repast; that is to say, it swallows little pebbles. The grain, softened
-in the crop and moistened with the digestive juice during its passage
-through the succenturiate ventricle, reaches the gizzard mixed with the
-little stones that are to aid the triturating action. The work then
-performed is easy to understand. If you pressed in your palm a handful
-of wheat mixed with gravel, and if your fingers, by continual movement,
-made the two kinds of particles rub vigorously against each other, is
-it not true that the wheat would soon be reduced to powder? Such is the
-action of the gizzard. Its strong, fleshy walls contract powerfully and
-knead their contents of sand and seeds without suffering damage
-themselves from the friction, because of the tough skin that lines
-their inside and protects them from the roughness of the gravel. In
-such a mill the hardest kernels are soon reduced to a sort of soup.
-
-“To make you understand the prodigious power of the gizzard, I cannot
-do better than relate to you certain experiments performed by a learned
-Italian, the abbot Spallanzani. A century ago the celebrated abbot,
-while pursuing his researches on the natural history of animals, caused
-a number of hens to swallow some little glass balls. ‘These balls,’ he
-said, ‘were sufficiently tough not to break when thrown forcibly on to
-the ground. After remaining three hours in the hen’s gizzard they were
-for the most part reduced to very tiny pieces with nothing sharp about
-them, all their edges having been blunted as if they had passed through
-a mill. I noticed also that the longer these little glass balls
-remained in the stomach, the finer the powder to which they were
-reduced. After a few hours they were broken into a multitude of
-vitreous particles no larger than grains of sand.’”
-
-“A stomach that can grind glass balls to powder,” commented Jules, “is
-certainly a first-rate mill.”
-
-“You shall hear something still more remarkable,” returned his uncle.
-“Wait. ‘As these balls,’ continued the abbot, ‘were polished and
-smooth, they could not create any kind of disturbance in the gizzard.’
-So he was curious to see what would happen if sharp and cutting bodies
-were introduced. ‘We know,’ he says, ‘how easily little pieces of
-glass, broken up by pounding, tear the flesh. Well, having shattered a
-pane of glass, I selected some pieces about the size of a pea and
-wrapped them in a playing card so that they would not lacerate the
-gullet in their passage. Thus prepared, I made a cock swallow them,
-well knowing that the covering of card would break on its entrance into
-the stomach and leave the glass free to act with all its points and
-sharp edges.’”
-
-“With all those little pieces of glass in its stomach,” said Jules,
-“the bird must surely have died.”
-
-“Not a bit of it. The bird would have come out all right if the
-experimenter had not sacrificed it to see the result. The cock was
-killed at the end of twenty hours. ‘All the pieces of glass were in the
-gizzard,’ the abbot tells us, ‘but all their sharp edges and points had
-disappeared so completely that, having put these fragments on my palm,
-I could rub them hard with the other hand without inflicting the
-slightest wound.
-
-“‘The reader,’ he goes on, ‘must be curious to learn the effect
-produced on the gizzard by these sharp-pointed bodies that rolled
-around there unceasingly until they lost their keen edges and sharp
-points. Opening the cock’s gizzard, I examined minutely the inside skin
-after having well washed and cleaned it. I even separated it from the
-gizzard, which is done without difficulty, and thus it was easy to
-scrutinize it as closely as I wished. Well, after all my pains I found
-it perfectly intact, without a tear or cut, without even the slightest
-scratch. The skin appeared to me absolutely the same as that of the
-cocks that had not swallowed glass.’”
-
-“So the bird that is made to swallow pieces of broken glass,” said
-Jules, “grinds them up without injury and without even a scratch, while
-we could not so much as handle this dangerous stuff with the tips of
-our fingers without wounding ourselves. This power of the gizzard is
-really inconceivable.”
-
-“What follows is still more surprising,” resumed Uncle Paul.
-“Spallanzani continues: ‘The experiments with glass not having done the
-birds any harm, I performed two others that were much more dangerous.
-In a leaden ball I placed twelve large steel needles so that they stuck
-out of the ball more than half a centimeter, and I made a turkey
-swallow this ball, bristling with points and wrapped in a card; and it
-kept the ball in its stomach a day and a half. During this time the
-bird showed not the slightest discomfort, and in fact there could have
-been none, for on killing the bird I found that its stomach had not
-received the slightest wound from this barbarous device. All the
-needles were broken off and separated from the leaden ball, two of them
-being still in the gizzard, their points greatly blunted, while the
-other ten had disappeared, ejected with the excrement.
-
-“‘Finally, I fixed in a leaden ball twelve little steel lancets, very
-sharp and cutting, and I made another turkey swallow the terrible pill.
-It remained sixteen hours in the gizzard, after which I opened the bird
-and found only the ball minus the lancets; these had all been broken,
-three of them, their points and edges entirely blunted, being found in
-the intestines, the nine others having been ejected. As for the
-gizzard, it showed no trace of a wound.’
-
-“You see, my little friends, a bird’s gizzard is the most wonderful
-organ of trituration in the world. What are the best-equipped jaws in
-comparison with this strong pouch which, without suffering so much as a
-scratch, reduces glass to powder and breaks and blunts steel needles
-and lancets? You can understand now with what ease the hardest seeds
-can be ground when the gizzard of the granivorous bird presses and
-rolls them pell-mell with small stones.”
-
-“Where glass and steel are broken up,” said Emile, “grain ought to turn
-to flour as well as in a mill.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER III
-
-THE CHIEF KINDS OF POULTRY
-
-
-“Different kinds of poultry, the originals of our domestic species, are
-living to this day in a wild state in the forests of Asia, notably in
-India, and in the Philippine Islands and Java. The most noteworthy is
-the Bankiva or red jungle fowl. In shape, plumage, and habits the male
-bird bears a striking resemblance to the common rooster of our
-poultry-yards; but in size it is smaller even than the partridge. It
-has a scalloped red comb, a tail of arched plumage, and a neck
-ornamented with a falling tippet of bright, golden-red feathers. This
-graceful little cock, irritable and full of fight, has the habits of
-ours. He struts proudly at the head of his flock of hens, over whose
-safety he watches with extreme care. If hunters range the forest, or if
-some dog prowls in the neighborhood, the vigilant bird, quick to
-perceive, suspects an enemy. He immediately flies to a high branch and
-thence gives forth a cry of alarm to warn the hens, which hastily
-conceal themselves under the leaves or crouch in the hollows of trees
-and wait motionless until the danger is past. To get within gun-shot of
-these birds is well-nigh impossible, and to capture them one must have
-recourse to the same snares one uses for catching larks.”
-
-“A fowl smaller than a partridge, and that they catch in the woods with
-snares for larks,” remarked Jules, “ought to be a very pretty bird, but
-not of much use if raised in poultry-yards. Does our poultry come from
-such a small kind as that?”
-
-“It certainly comes either from the Bankiva fowl or from other kinds
-just as small that live in a wild state in the forests of Asia; but
-when and how the hen and the cock became domesticated is wholly
-unknown. From the dawn of history man has been in possession of the
-barnyard fowl, at least in Asia, whence later the species came to us
-already domesticated. During long centuries, improved by our care,
-which assures it abundant food and comfortable shelter, the original
-small species has produced numerous varieties differing much in size
-and plumage. They are classed in three groups: the small, the medium,
-and the large.
-
-“To the first group belongs the bantam or little English fowl, about
-the size of a partridge. It is a beautiful bird with short legs that
-let the tips of the wings drag on the ground, quick movements, gentle
-and tame habits. Its eggs, proportioned to the small size of the hen,
-weigh scarcely thirty grams apiece, while those of other hens weigh
-from sixty to ninety grams each. These pretty little pullets are raised
-rather as ornaments to the poultry-yard than for the sake of their
-diminutive eggs.”
-
-“These little fowl,” observed Louis, “look from their size like the
-primitive kind.”
-
-“Yes, it was about like that they looked when man took it into his head
-to tame the wild fowl. In the poultry-yards of those times lived, not
-the large species of our day, but birds as small in body and as quick
-on the wing as the partridge. I leave you to imagine what care and
-vigilance were necessary in order not to frighten these timid little
-fowl and cause them to go back to the woods that they still
-remembered.”
-
-“It must have been as much trouble,” said Louis, “as it would be for us
-to tame a covey of partridges. Such an undertaking would not be easy.
-We are a long way from those first attempts at domestication with our
-hens of to-day, so tame, so importunate even, that they come boldly and
-pick up crumbs under the very table.”
-
-“The common poultry, that which stocks the greater number of farms,
-belongs to the medium-sized breeds. Its plumage is of all colors, from
-white to red and black. Its head is small and ornamented with a red
-comb, sometimes single, sometimes double, coquettishly thrown to one
-side. The cock, for its proud bearing and magnificent plumage, has no
-equal among the other species. The common fowl is the easiest to keep,
-for its activity permits it to seek and find for itself, by scratching
-in the ground, a great part of its food in the form of seeds and worms.
-It may be found fault with for its wandering proclivities, favored by a
-strong wing which it avails itself of to fly over hedges and fences, to
-go and devastate the neighboring gardens.
-
-“Among the other medium-sized species which, associated with the common
-fowl, are found in poultry-yards as ornaments rather than as sources of
-profit, I will name the following:
-
-“First, the Paduan fowl, recognizable by its rich plumage and
-particularly by the thick tuft of feathers that adorns its head. This
-beautiful headdress of fine plumage, so proudly spread out in fine
-weather, is, when once wet by rain, nothing but an ungraceful rag,
-heavy and tangled, which tires the bird and makes the rustic life of
-the poultry-yard impossible as far as it is concerned.
-
-“The Houdan fowl wears a thickly tufted top-knot which is thrown back
-over the nape of the neck. Sometimes this headdress covers the eyes so
-completely that the bird cannot see in front nor sidewise, but only on
-the ground, which makes it uneasy at the slightest noise. The plumage
-is speckled black and white, with glints of purple and green. The
-cheeks and the base of the beak are draped with little upturned
-feathers. Each foot has five toes instead of four, the usual number—not
-counting the cock’s spur, which is simply a horn, a fighting weapon,
-and not a toe. Three of the toes point forward and two backward.
-
-“The fowl of la Flèche, so renowned for the delicacy of its flesh and
-its aptness for fattening, has no crest and is long-legged, with black
-plumage of green and purple luster. The legs are blue and the comb
-rises in two little red horns.
-
-“Similar but better developed horns, accompanied by a thick headdress
-of feathers, adorn the Crève-cœur species. The hen is a beautiful
-black; the cock wears, against body plumage of the same dark color, a
-rich gold or silver tippet.
-
-“Finally, to the large species belongs the Cochin-China, an ungraceful
-bird, with very strong body and shapeless and disordered plumage,
-generally reddish white. Its eggs are brownish in color.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IV
-
-THE EGG
-
-
-“When moistening your slices of bread with egg, has it ever occurred to
-you to examine a little the structure of what furnishes your repast? I
-think not. To-day I am going to tell you something about this: I will
-show you in detail this wonder called an egg.
-
-“First, let us examine the shell. In hens’ eggs it is all white, as
-also in those of ducks and geese. Turkeys’ eggs are speckled with a
-multitude of little pale red spots. But it is particularly the eggs of
-undomesticated birds that are remarkable for their coloring. There are
-sky-blue ones, such as those of certain blackbirds; rose color for
-certain warblers; and somber green with a tinge of bronze is found, for
-example, in the eggs of the nightingale. The coloring is sometimes
-uniform, sometimes enhanced by darker spots, or by a haphazard
-sprinkling of pigment, or by odd markings resembling some sort of
-illegible handwriting. Many rapacious birds, chiefly those of the sea,
-lay eggs with large fawn-colored spots that make them look like the
-pelt of a leopard. I will not dwell longer on this subject, interesting
-though it may be, as in telling you the story of the auxiliary birds I
-have already described the eggs of the principal kinds.”
-
-“I have taken care,” interposed Jules, “to remember the curious variety
-of coloring that eggs have. I recall very distinctly the nightingale’s,
-green like an olive; the goldfinch’s, spotted with reddish brown,
-especially at the larger end; the crow’s, bluish green with brown
-spots; and so many others that I hesitate to say which are my
-favorites, so nearly equal are they in beauty.”
-
-“Let us learn now about the nature of the shell,” his uncle continued.
-“The substance of the shell is, in the hen’s egg, as white as marble;
-its own color not being disguised by any foreign pigment. This pure
-white and its other characteristics, hardness and clean fracture, do
-they not tell you of what substance the shell is composed?”
-
-“Either appearances deceive me greatly,” answered Louis, “or the shell
-is simply made of stone.”
-
-“Yes, my friend, it is indeed of stone, but stone selected with
-exquisite care and refined as it were, in the bird’s body.
-
-“In its nature the eggshell does not differ from common building-stone;
-or rather, on account of its extreme purity, it does not differ from
-the chalk that you use on the blackboard, or from the magnificent white
-marble that the sculptor seeks for the masterpieces of his chisel.
-Building-stone, marble, and chalk are at bottom the same substance,
-which is called lime, limestone, or carbonate of lime. The differences,
-great as they may be, have to do with the state of purity and degree of
-consistency. That which building-stone contains in a state of impurity
-from other ingredients is contained also in white marble and chalk, but
-free from any admixture. Thus in its nature the eggshell is identical
-with chalk and marble, harder than the first, less hard than the
-second, being between the two in an intermediate state of pure lime. To
-clothe the egg, therefore, with a solid envelope, the hen and all birds
-without exception use the same material as the sculptor works with in
-his studio and the scholar uses on the blackboard.
-
-“Now, no animal creates matter; none makes its body, with all that
-comes from it, out of nothing. The bird does not find within itself the
-material for the eggshell; it gets it from outside with its food. Amid
-the grain that is thrown to her the hen finds little bits of stone left
-there through imperfect cleaning; she swallows them without hesitation,
-knowing full well, however, that they are little stones and not kernels
-of wheat. That is not enough; you will see her all day long scratching
-and pecking here and there in the poultry-yard. Now and then she digs
-up some worm, her great delicacy, and from time to time some fragment
-of limestone, which she turns to account with as much satisfaction as
-if she had found a plump insect.”
-
-“I have often seen hens swallowing little stones like that,” remarked
-Emile. “I thought it was all their own carelessness or gluttonous
-haste, but now I begin to suspect the truth. Would not those little
-stones be useful in making the eggshell?”
-
-“You are right, my little friend. The particles of lime swallowed with
-the food are converted into a fine pap, dissolved by the digestive
-action of the stomach. By a rigorous sorting the pure lime is separated
-from the rest, and it is made into a sort of chalk soup which at the
-right moment oozes around the egg and hardens into a shell. By
-swallowing little particles of lime, the hen, as you see, lays by
-materials for her eggshell. If these materials were wanting, if the
-food given her did not include lime, if, imprisoned in a cage, she
-could not procure carbonate of lime for herself by pecking in the
-ground, she would lay eggs without any shell and simply covered with a
-flabby skin.”
-
-“Those soft eggs that hens sometimes lay come then from lack of lime?”
-asked Louis.
-
-“They either come from the bird’s not having had the necessary
-carbonate of lime in her food or in the earth she pecked, or else her
-bad state of health did not permit the transformation of the little
-stones into that chalky pap which molds itself around the egg and
-becomes the shell. In countries where carbonate of lime is scarce in
-the soil, or even totally lacking, it is the custom to break up the
-eggshells and mix the coarse powder in the fowl’s food. It is a very
-judicious way of giving the hen in the most convenient form, the stony
-matter necessary for the perfect formation of the egg.”
-
-“Sometimes,” observed Louis, “we find on the dunghill eggs of a queer
-shape and as soft as hens’ eggs without the shell. Instead of a
-chicken, a snake comes out of them. They say they are laid by young
-cocks.”
-
-“You are repeating now one of the false notions prevalent in the
-country—a foolish notion springing from a basis of actual fact. It is
-perfectly true that eggs soft, rather long, almost cylindrical, and of
-the same size at both ends, may be turned up by the fork as it stirs
-the warm manure of a dunghill. It is also perfectly true that from
-these eggs snakes are hatched, to the great surprise of the innocent
-person who thinks he sees there the product of some witchcraft. What is
-false is the supposed origin of the egg. Never, never has the cock, be
-he young or old, the faculty reserved exclusively for the hen, the
-faculty of laying. Those eggs found in dunghills, and remarkable for
-their strange shape, do not come from fowl; they are simply the eggs of
-a serpent, of an inoffensive snake which, when opportunity offers,
-buries its laying in the warm mass of a dunghill to aid the hatching.
-It is quite natural, then, that from serpents’ eggs serpents should
-hatch.”
-
-“The ridiculous marvel of the supposed cock’s eggs,” returned Louis,
-“thus becomes a very simple thing; but one must first know that
-serpents lay eggs.”
-
-“Henceforth you will know that not only serpents but all reptiles lay
-eggs just as birds do. Snakes’ eggs are flabby, and for covering have
-only a sort of skin resembling wet parchment. Moreover, they are long
-in shape, which is far from being the usual form. But the eggs of some
-reptiles, notably of lizards, have the shell firm and of the fine oval
-shape peculiar to birds’ eggs. If you ever encounter in holes in the
-wall, or in dry sand well exposed to the sun, little eggs, all white,
-with shell as fine as a little canary bird’s, do not cry out at the
-strangeness of your discovery; you will simply have come across the
-eggs of a gray lizard, the usual inhabitant of old walls.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER V
-
-THE EGG (Continued)
-
-
-“Let us return to the hen. We know the calcareous nature of the shell;
-now let us look at the structure. Open your eyes wide and look
-attentively; you will see on the shell, chiefly at the large end, a
-multitude of tiny dents such as might be made by the point of a fine
-needle. Each of these dents corresponds to an invisible hole that
-pierces the shell through and through and establishes communication
-between the interior and the exterior. These holes, much too small to
-let out the liquid contents of the egg, nevertheless suffice both for
-the emission of humid vapors, which are dissipated outside the shell,
-and for the admission of air, which penetrates within and replaces the
-evaporated humidity.
-
-“The presence of these innumerable openings is absolutely necessary for
-the awakening and keeping up of life in the future chicken. Every
-living thing breathes, and all life springs into being and continues
-through the action of air. The seed that germinates under ground must
-have air. Planted too deep, it perishes sooner or later without being
-able to rise, because the thick bed of earth prevents the air from
-reaching it. The egg must have air so that its substance, gently warmed
-by the brooding mother hen, may spring into life and become a little
-chicken; it must have it continually, shut up as it is in its shell.
-Thanks to the openings with which the shell is riddled, the air
-penetrates sufficiently to meet the needs of respiration; it quickens
-the substance of the egg and the little being slowly forming within.”
-
-“One might say,” Emile here put in, “that these holes are so many
-little windows through which air reaches the bird in its narrow cell of
-the egg.”
-
-“These windows, as Emile calls them,” his uncle went on, “deserve our
-attention from another point of view. Eggs are a precious alimentary
-provision; the difficulty is to keep them for any length of time. If
-they get too old they spoil and give out then an infectious, bad smell.
-Well, then, what causes the eggs to spoil and changes them to
-repulsive-smelling filth is again air—the same air so indispensable to
-the formation of the chicken. That which gives life to the egg under
-the heat of the brooding hen brings destruction just as quickly when
-the warmth is wanting. If, then, it is proposed to preserve in a state
-of freshness as long as possible eggs destined for food, it is
-necessary to prevent the access of air into their interior, which is
-done by closing the openings in the shell. Several means may be
-employed. Sometimes eggs are plunged for a moment into melted grease,
-from which they are drawn out covered with a coating that obstructs all
-the orifices; sometimes they are varnished. The simplest method is to
-keep them in water in which a little lime has been dissolved. This
-dissolved lime deposits itself on the shell and closes the openings.
-These precautions taken, the air can no longer find a passage to
-penetrate into the interior and the eggs are preserved in good
-condition much longer than they would be without this preparation.
-Nevertheless they always spoil in the long run.”
-
-“If I have properly understood what you have just told us about the
-need of air for the awakening of life,” remarked Jules, “eggs thus
-coated with varnish or lime will not hatch when under the brooding
-hen?”
-
-“Evidently not. Rendered impervious to air by the varnish, lime,
-grease, or what not, the eggs might remain indefinitely under the
-brooding hen without ever coming to life; for want of the quickening
-action of the air, life would no more awaken in them than in simple
-stones. You understand, then, that the method of preservation by means
-of a coating that closes the orifices of the shell must only be
-employed for eggs destined for food, and that care must be taken not to
-make use of it in those destined for hatching.
-
-“But this is enough about the outside of the egg. Now let us break the
-shell. What do we find within? We find a delicate membrane, a supple
-skin which lines the whole of the shell and forms a kind of bag,
-without any opening, filled with the white and yolk. When by some
-accident the limy coating is lacking, this membrane constitutes the
-sole covering of the egg—a covering as soft as thin parchment soaked in
-water.”
-
-“Then soft eggs without any shell have this membrane all exposed?”
-queried Jules.
-
-“Exactly. A new-laid egg has its shell completely filled; but it soon
-loses some of its humidity, which evaporates through the orifices in
-the shell. A void is then created in the interior, near the large end,
-where the evaporation is most rapid. At this end, therefore, the
-membrane detaches itself from the shell that it lined and draws further
-in with the contents of the egg shrunk by the evaporation. Thus is
-produced at the large end a cavity which the air from outside enters
-and which for this reason is called the air-chamber. This chamber,
-wanting at first, grows little by little according to the space left by
-the moisture’s evaporation; consequently, the older the egg, the larger
-the space. If the egg is placed under the hen, the heat of the mother
-aids evaporation and causes the quick formation of the air-chamber.
-There gathers, as in a reservoir, the supply of air needed for the
-vitality of the egg and the respiration of the coming bird. So the
-empty space at the large end is a respiratory storehouse.
-
-“When you eat an egg boiled in the shell, break it carefully at the
-large end. If the egg is very fresh the white will be seen immediately
-under the shell without any empty space; but if it is old you will find
-an unoccupied hollow of varying size. That is the air-chamber.
-According to its size you can judge of the egg’s freshness. But it
-would be more desirable to be able to recognize, before using and
-breaking it, whether an egg is fresh or stale. I have seen the
-following means used, which would seem very strange if what I have just
-told you about the air-chamber did not furnish the explanation. The tip
-of the tongue is applied to the large end. If the egg is fresh a slight
-impression of coolness can be felt; if stale, the tongue remains warm.
-This little mystery is based on the different manner of behavior of
-liquids and gases when brought into contact with heat. Water and
-liquids in general take away rather quickly the heat of the bodies with
-which they come in contact; air and other gases, on the contrary, take
-it away very slowly. That is why water seems cold when we plunge our
-hand into it, while the air, lower in temperature, seems warm by
-comparison. In reality, if both be of the same temperature, air and
-water give us different sensations: water is cool to us because it
-draws our heat away; air warm because it does not take away that same
-heat. So if the egg is fresh, and consequently the shell completely
-filled, the tip of the tongue applied to the large end feels the same
-sensation as comes from contact with liquids; that is to say, a feeling
-of coolness. But if the egg is stale, an air-chamber has formed and the
-resulting sensation is that produced by contact with a gas; that is to
-say, a sensation of warmth, since the tongue loses none of its natural
-heat.”
-
-“That is certainly a curious test,” said Jules, “and I shall make it a
-point to carry it out at the next opportunity.”
-
-“Let us go on with the egg. Now comes the glair or white, so called
-because heat hardens it to a pure white matter. For the same reason,
-science calls it albumen, from a Latin word, albus, meaning white. The
-glair is arranged in a number of layers, which at both ends of the egg
-twist round one another and form two large knotty cords called chalazæ.
-To see these cords you must break a raw egg carefully in a plate. Then
-you can distinguish, on each side of the yolk, a mass where the glair
-is thicker and rather knotty. There, somewhat injured by the breaking
-of the egg, are found the two cords in question. To give you a clear
-idea, take an orange, put it in your handkerchief, and twist the latter
-in opposite directions at both ends. The orange in its handkerchief
-covering will represent the spherical yolk surrounded by the glair; the
-two twisted ends of the handkerchief will be the two strings of white,
-the two chalazæ. By means of these two tethers the yolk, the most
-important and most delicate part of the egg, is suspended as in a
-hammock, in the center of the glair, without being exposed to
-disturbances that would be dangerous for the germ of life situated at a
-point on its surface. This glairy hammock, with its two suspending
-cords, has another rôle—a very delicate one. The first outlines of the
-coming chick will appear at a certain point of the yolk. As the little
-being forms and grows, it needs more space while still remaining
-tightly enveloped and held in position so as to avoid the slightest
-disturbance in the half fluid flesh just beginning to assume its proper
-shape. How are these conditions realized in the egg? To understand the
-matter thoroughly let us go back to the orange wrapped in a
-handkerchief twisted at both ends. Is it not true that if both ends
-untwist a little, the orange, supposing it to need by degrees more
-room, will always find the necessary space without for a moment ceasing
-to be enveloped and motionless? In the same manner the suspending cords
-of the white slacken and gradually untwist as the little bird grows, at
-the expense of the yolk, in its soft hammock of glair; the needed space
-is made, and at the same time the feeble little bird remains just as
-finely swaddled and suspended in the center of the egg, protected from
-contact with the hard shell.”
-
-“At the beginning,” interposed Jules, “you called an egg a marvel. I
-see that there are, in fact, in the egg things very worthy of our
-admiration: the shell, with its numerous air-holes; the cavity at the
-large end; the air-chamber where provision is made for breathing; the
-soft little bed of glair with its suspending cords that untwist to make
-more room, and perhaps that is not all?”
-
-“No, my friend, that is very far from being all. I limit myself here to
-the simplest things and those that are not beyond your grasp. How would
-it be if you could follow me in the unfolding of higher ideas? You
-would see how everything in the egg is arranged with infinite delicacy,
-with a foresight that we may call maternal, and then you would find my
-word marvel the right one. But, not to go beyond your small powers of
-comprehension, I abridge, much to my regret.
-
-“The yolk or yelk (which means the yellow part) is round and bright
-yellow; hence its name. At a point on its surface, generally at the
-top, no matter what the position of the egg, is seen a circular spot,
-dull white, where the matter is a little more condensed than elsewhere.
-It is called the cicatricle, or little scar. That is the sacred spot
-where lies the spark of life which, animated by incubation, will
-quicken the substance of the egg and mold it into a living being; it is
-the point of departure, the origin, the germ of the bird. The yolk
-itself is the nutritive reservoir whence are drawn the materials for
-this work of creation. Quickened by the heat of the brooding hen and by
-the action of the air, it becomes covered with a network of fine veins.
-These swell with the substance of the yolk, which turns to blood; and
-this blood, carried hither and thither, becomes the flesh of the being
-in process of formation. The yolk, then, is the bird’s first food, but
-food that no beak seizes and no stomach digests, none being in
-existence yet. It changes to blood and afterward to flesh without the
-preparatory work of ordinary digestion; it enters the veins directly,
-and thus nourishes the whole body.
-
-“Animals with udders—the mammifers—also have nutriment for the very
-young in the form of milk, which is indispensable for the weak stomach
-of the nursling. Well, the yolk is to the bird in its shell what milk
-is to the lamb and kitten; it is its milk-food, as it can have no
-recourse to maternal udders. The popular saying has perfectly caught
-the strict resemblance: they call a drink prepared with the yolk of an
-egg, ‘hen’s milk.’”
-
-“That is what Mother Ambroisine makes me take when I cough in the
-winter,” said Emile.
-
-“The delicious beverage that Mother Ambroisine gives you when you have
-a cold is very properly called ‘hen’s milk,’ since it is made with the
-equivalent of milk; that is to say, the yolk of an egg.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VI
-
-INCUBATION
-
-
-“Incubation means lying upon. The brooding bird does in fact crouch or
-lie upon her eggs, warming them with the heat of her body for a number
-of days with indefatigable patience. When a hen wishes to set, [1] she
-makes it known by her repeated cluckings, little cries of maternal
-anxiety, by her ruffled feathers, her restless movements, and
-particularly by the perseverance with which she stays on the nest, even
-when it has no eggs, where she has been in the habit of laying.
-
-“Some hens with wandering dispositions go back to the instincts of
-their wild race. They leave the hen-house and seek a hedge or thicket,
-where they select a hiding-place to suit them, and there make a little
-hollow in the earth which they line as well as they can with a mattress
-of dry grass, leaves, and feathers. That is a nest in the rough,
-without art, a shapeless construction in comparison with the clever
-masterpiece of the chaffinch and goldfinch. It is, furthermore, worthy
-of remark that all the domestic birds, as if man’s intervention had
-destroyed their skill by freeing them from want, fail to display in the
-construction of their nests the admirable resourcefulness shown by most
-wild birds. Here might be repeated the saying, as true for man as for
-beast, necessity is the mother of invention. Sure of finding, when the
-time comes for laying, the basket stuffed with hay by the hand of the
-housewife, the domestic fowl does not trouble herself to build a nest,
-an undertaking in which the tiniest bird of the fields shows itself a
-consummate architect. At the most, when her adventurous disposition
-makes her prefer the perilous shelter of the hedge to the safe retreat
-of the poultry-yard, the hen, gleaning with her beak a few straws and
-leaves, and plucking, if need be, some of her own feathers, succeeds in
-making, for her period of brooding, a disordered heap rather than a
-nest. There, every day, unknown to all, she goes and lays her egg. Then
-for three whole weeks she is not to be seen, or only at intervals. That
-is the time of incubation. At last, some fine day, she reappears, very
-proud, at the head of a family of young chickens, peeping and pecking
-around her.”
-
-“I should like,” said Emile, “to have some hens that set like that in
-the fields and then come home again some day with their family of
-little chickens.”
-
-“I must admit it is a sight worthy of interest, that of a hen that has
-stolen her nest returning to the farmhouse at the head of her newly
-hatched young chickens. Her eyes shine with satisfaction; her clucking
-has something joyful about it. ‘Look,’ she seems to say to those who
-welcome her, ‘see how fine, alert, and vigorous these young chickens
-are; they are all mine; I raised them there all alone in a corner of
-the hedge, and now I bring them to you. Am I not a fine hen?’ Yes, my
-dear biddy, you are a fine hen, but also an imprudent one. In the
-fields prowl the weasel and the marten which, if you are absent a
-moment, will suck the blood of your little ones; in the fields the fox
-is watching to wring your neck; in the fields there are cold, rain, bad
-weather, grave peril for your shivering family. You would do better to
-remain at home.
-
-“The greater number follow this prudent advice and do not leave the
-poultry-yard. In the semi-obscurity of a sheltered quiet corner is
-placed the egg-basket, lined with a bed of hay or of crumpled straw. In
-it are put from twelve to fifteen eggs, the largest and freshest being
-chosen, and preferably those not more than a week old. If they were two
-or three weeks old they would not be sure to hatch, as in many of them
-the germ would have become too old and would have lost the power to
-develop. These arrangements made, the eggs are left to the setting hen
-without being touched again.
-
-“Whoever has not seen a setting hen has missed one of the most touching
-sights in this world: the devotion of the mother-bird to her eggs, her
-self-forgetfulness even to the point of sacrificing her own life. Her
-eyes shine with fever, her skin burns. Eating and drinking are
-forgotten, and in order not to leave her eggs a moment a hen might even
-let herself die of hunger on the nest if some one did not come every
-day and gently take her off and make her eat. Others, less persevering,
-leave the basket of their own accord, snatch up a little food, and
-immediately go back to the nest.”
-
-“Do hens keep up that tiresome setting very long?” asked Emile.
-
-“It takes twenty or twenty-one days for the young chickens to come out
-of the shell. During the whole of that time, night and day, the mother
-remains squatting on the eggs, except for the rare moments that she
-spares, as if grudgingly, for the necessities of nourishment. Her only
-distraction in this complete retirement is to turn the eggs over every
-twenty-four hours and change their place, moving those outside into the
-center, and vice versa, so that all may have an equal share of heat.
-That is a delicate operation, and it must be left to the hen’s care to
-move the eggs with her beak. Let us be careful not to interfere with
-our clumsy hands, for the bird knows better than we how to manage it.”
-
-“If the hen is so careful to move the eggs every day and give them all
-the same amount of heat,” said Jules, “it must be heat alone that makes
-them hatch?”
-
-“Yes, my friend, simply the heat of the mother makes the eggs hatch.
-That is why the hen can be dispensed with and the eggs hatched by
-artificial heat, provided it be well regulated, gentle, and continued
-for a long time without interruption. The Egyptians, an ancient people
-of great skill, practised this method thousands of years ago. They put
-the eggs by hundreds of dozens into a sort of oven gently heated for
-three weeks, the period of natural incubation. At the end of that time
-the peepings of the countless brood did not fail to announce the
-success of the operation.”
-
-“What a big family that oven-hatched brood must have been!” exclaimed
-Emile. “It would have taken a hundred hens to set on all the eggs, but
-in this way they were all hatched at once.”
-
-“A setting hen ceases to lay, and it was doubtless in order not to
-interrupt the beneficent daily production of eggs that the Egyptians
-invented artificial incubation in an oven. For the same reason
-sometimes with us recourse is had to this means, especially where the
-raising of poultry is made a business; only the incubation is no longer
-carried out in an oven but in ingeniously contrived incubators. In a
-drawer, on a bed of hay, the eggs are placed in a single layer. Above,
-and separated from the brooder by a sheet-iron partition, is a bed of
-water, which a lamp, kept always alight, warms and maintains at the
-temperature that the hen’s body would give; that is to say, forty
-degrees centigrade. In twenty-one days under this warm ceiling the eggs
-hatch just as they would under the hen.”
-
-“Oh, Uncle,” cried Emile, “I should really like to have an incubator
-like that in a corner of my room and watch the progress of the hatching
-every day by opening the drawer.”
-
-“What you would like to do, others, more skilful, have already done,
-not only opening the drawer but breaking an egg each day so as to see
-how things are going. I told you that the germ of the bird is a round
-spot of dull white, the cicatricle, which by its mobility is always on
-top at the surface of the yolk, no matter what the position of the egg.
-After five or six hours of incubation you can already distinguish in
-the center of the cicatricle a minute glairy swelling which will be the
-head, and a line which will be the backbone. Pretty soon there begins
-to beat, at regular intervals, the organ most necessary to life, the
-heart, which chases through a network of fine veins the blood formed,
-little by little, out of the substance of the yolk, and distributes it
-everywhere to furnish materials to the other organs just coming into
-being. It is toward the second day that these first heart-beats,
-destined to continue henceforth until death, become apparent. Thus
-irrigated with running flesh—for blood is nothing else—this organism
-thenceforward makes rapid progress. The eyes show themselves and form a
-large black spot on each side of the head; the quills of the large
-feathers form in their sheaths; the scales of the feet are outlined in
-a bluish tint; the bones, at first gelatinous, acquire firmness by
-becoming incrusted with a small quantity of stony matter. From the
-tenth day all the parts of the young chicken are well formed. The
-little being, softly suspended in its hammock by means of the two
-suspending cords that untwist little by little to give more room as it
-grows, is bent over on itself, the head folded against the breast and
-hidden under its wing. Note, my friends, that it is precisely this
-attitude of deep sleep inside the egg that the hen assumes when she
-wants to sleep. Crouched on her perch, she again folds her head on her
-breast and tucks it under her wing, just as she did when she was a
-little chicken in its shell.
-
-“In the meantime the little bird keeps growing on the yellow and white
-matter; matter which soaks and penetrates it and, vivified by the air,
-becomes its blood and its flesh. One day it breaks the thin membrane
-under the shell, and there it is more at ease with the increase of
-space given it by the air-chamber. Now an attentive ear can distinguish
-feeble peepings inside the shell; it is the seventeenth or eighteenth
-day. A couple of days more, and the young chicken, summoning all its
-strength, will apply itself to the arduous work of deliverance. A
-pointed callosity, made expressly for the purpose, has formed on the
-upper part of the tip-end of the beak. Here is the tool, the pick, for
-opening its prison; a tool for that particular purpose and of very
-short duration, which will disappear as soon as the shell is pierced.
-With this provisional pick, the little chicken begins to hammer the
-shell; perseveringly it pushes, strikes, scratches, until the stone
-wall yields. For the most vigorous it takes several hours. Oh, joy! the
-shell is broken; there is the young chicken’s little head, and all
-yellow velvety down, and still wet with the moisture of the egg. The
-mother comes to its aid and completes its deliverance; others, weaker
-or less skilful, take twenty-four hours of painful effort to free
-themselves. Some even exhaust themselves in the undertaking and perish
-miserably in the egg without succeeding in breaking the shell.”
-
-“Those are the very ones the mother ought to help,” said Jules.
-
-“She would be careful not to, for fear of a worse accident than a
-difficult birth. How could she direct her blows accurately enough not
-to wound the tender little chicken just inside the shell? The slightest
-false move would cause a wound, and at so tender an age any wound is
-death. We ourselves, with all the dexterity and care possible, could
-not, without danger, help the bird in distress; it can be tried as a
-last resort, but the chance of success is very small. The young chicken
-is the only one capable of carrying through this delicate deliverance
-if strength does not fail it. The hen knows this wonderfully well, and
-so does not interfere except to finish freeing the prisoner when half
-out of its shell. Let us hope that things will turn out as we wish, and
-that on the twenty-first day the whole family may be warmed under the
-mother’s wings without mortal accident at the moment of hatching.
-
-“From the instant of leaving the shell the young chickens already know
-how to peck food and how to run around the mother who, clucking, leads
-the way. They have besides a little fur of downy hair that clothes them
-warmly. This development is not found in all birds; far from it.
-Pigeons, for example, come naked from the egg and do not know how to
-eat; the father and mother have to feed them by disgorging a mouthful
-of food into their beaks. The young of the warbler, chaffinch,
-goldfinch, tomtit, lark, in fact of nearly all the field birds, are
-naked, very weak, at first blind, and completely incapable of feeding
-themselves, even with the food just under their beaks. The parents,
-with infinite tenderness, have for a number of days to bring it to them
-and put it into their beaks.”
-
-“That is a difference that has always struck me,” commented Jules.
-“Little sparrows open their mouths wide to receive the food offered
-them, but for a long time they do not know how to take it even if it is
-put at the very end of their beak. On the contrary, little chickens
-easily pick up from the ground for themselves the seeds and worms that
-the mother digs up for them.”
-
-“I will tell you, if you do not already know,” continued Uncle Paul,
-“that the young of the duck, turkey, goose, and, among wild birds, the
-partridge and quail, have the same precocity as those of the hen. They
-are clothed with down on coming out of the egg, and know how to eat.
-One of the causes of this difference in the way young birds act
-immediately after hatching comes from the size of the egg. The chick is
-formed wholly from the substances contained in the egg; the larger the
-egg in proportion to the size of the animal, the stronger and more
-developed the young. Therefore the kind with the largest eggs are
-clothed at the time of hatching; they can run and know how to eat,
-unaided. Where the eggs are relatively small the young are hatched
-weak, naked, blind, and for a long time, motionless in their nest,
-demand the mother’s beakful of food.
-
-“The largest egg known is that of an enormous bird that formerly lived
-in the island of Madagascar, and of which the species appears to-day to
-have been completely destroyed. This bird is called the epyornis. It
-was three or four meters tall and thus rivaled in stature a very
-long-legged horse or, better still, the animal called a giraffe. Such
-birds ought to lay monstrous eggs; such in fact they are; their length
-is three decimeters and a half and their capacity nearly nine liters.”
-
-“Nine liters!” exclaimed Emile. “Oh, what an egg! Our large vinegar jug
-only holds ten liters. Certainly the young that come from that ought to
-know how to run and to eat.”
-
-“To equal in bulk the egg of the epyornis it would take one hundred and
-forty-eight hen’s eggs.”
-
-“I think they could make a famous omelet with only one of those eggs.”
-
-“A fine large one could be made, too, with an ostrich-egg, which in
-size represents nearly two dozen hen’s eggs. It need not be added that
-young ostriches know how to run and to eat as soon as they come out of
-the shell.
-
-“Those are the largest eggs; now let us consider the smallest ones.
-They are those of the humming-bird, a charming creature whose splendid
-plumage would outshine the most brilliant costly metals, precious
-stones, and jewels. There are some as small as our large wasps and that
-certain spiders catch in their webs just as the spiders of our country
-catch gnats. Their nest is a cup of cotton no bigger than half an
-apricot. Judge then the size of the eggs. It would take three hundred
-and forty to make one hen’s egg, and fifty thousand to make one laid by
-the epyornis.”
-
-“I imagine the little humming-birds in their nest must be all naked at
-first and blind, taking their food from their mother’s beak.”
-
-“From the smallness of the egg it could not be otherwise.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VII
-
-THE YOUNG CHICKENS
-
-
-“The hatching of the eggs does not take place all at once; sometimes it
-is twenty-four hours before all the eggs are broken. A danger thus
-arises. Divided between her desire to continue setting and her wish to
-give her attention to the newly born, the mother may make some sudden
-movement and unintentionally trample on the tender creatures, or even
-leave the nest too soon, which would cause the loss of the backward
-eggs. What, then, is to be done? The first-born are taken as carefully
-as possible and placed in a basket stuffed with wool or cotton and put
-in a warm place near the fire. When the whole family is hatched it is
-restored to the mother.
-
-“The first days are hard ones for the young chickens; they are so
-delicate, poor little things, so chilly under their light yellow down.
-Where will they be kept at first? Shall it be with the grown-up
-poultry, a turbulent crowd, quarrelsome, rough, and without any
-consideration for the weak? What would become of them, the little
-innocents, not yet well balanced on their legs, in the midst of the
-greedy hens which, in scratching for worms, might give them some brutal
-kick? How dangerous for them to be with the quarrelsome cocks that
-disdain to look out for the frightened little giddy-heads straying
-about under their very spurs! No, no, that is not the place for them.
-
-“What they require is a place set apart, isolated from the rough
-grown-up poultry, heated to a mild temperature, and carpeted with fine
-straw. If this place is wanting, recourse is had to a coop, a sort of
-large cage, under which the mother is placed with some food. Sometimes
-the bars of this refuge are far enough apart to permit the young
-chickens to come in and go out at will, so as to enjoy their play;
-sometimes they are too close together for this, and then the coop is
-lifted a little at one side when it is desired to give liberty to the
-captives. But the mother always stays in the cage, whence she watches
-over the young chickens, calling them to her at the least appearance of
-danger. If the weather is fine, the coop is placed out of doors in an
-exposed spot, with a sheltering canopy of canvas, foliage, or straw,
-when the sun is too hot.”
-
-“There the young chickens are safe,” said Emile, “out of danger of any
-accident amongst the boisterous population of the poultry-yard. If some
-danger arises, the hen gives her warning call, and those that are
-outside immediately scamper through the narrow passage and take refuge
-with their mother. Now about their food.”
-
-“Food is not forgotten: under the coop is a plate containing water, and
-another with pap. For very young chickens it is not yet time for strong
-food, hard grain which requires a vigorous stomach to digest; they must
-have something at once nutritious and easy to digest. Their pap is
-composed of finely crumbled bread, a few salad leaves well chopped up,
-hard-boiled eggs, and a pinch of fine millet to accustom them by
-degrees to a diet of grain. The whole is carefully mixed.
-
-“On coming out of the shell, the young chickens, like other birds from
-a relatively large egg, are quick at taking food for themselves;
-nevertheless it is necessary, from their utter inexperience, for the
-mother to show them how to strike the beak into the pap. Let us witness
-this lesson of the first mouthful. The farmer’s wife has just put the
-food under the coop. ‘What is this?’ perhaps the innocent little
-chickens ask, their stomachs beginning to cry hunger now that they have
-been nearly twenty-four hours out of the shell. ‘What is this?’ All
-flurried with joy, the mother calls them to the plate in accents
-resembling articulate speech. They approach, tottering on their little
-legs. The hen then gives a few pecks in the mess, but only pretends to
-eat, so as not to diminish the dainty food reserved for the little
-ones. One of the chickens, perhaps a little quicker of apprehension
-than the rest, seems to have understood; it seizes a crumb of bread in
-its beak but immediately lets it fall again. The mother begins again,
-urges, encourages with her voice and look, and this time swallows in
-plain sight of them all. The young chicken returns to its crumb and
-after two or three attempts succeeds in swallowing it, half closing its
-eyes with satisfaction. ‘Ha! how good it is!’ it seems to say; ‘let us
-try again.’ And another crumb goes down; then a little piece of yolk of
-egg follows. Henceforth it can manage for itself. The example spreads;
-one here, another there, tries its beak; the hen repeating her patient
-lesson for the less clever of the brood. Soon they have all understood
-and are vying with one another in their assaults on the pap. Then comes
-a lesson in drinking. How to plunge the beak fearlessly into the water,
-how to raise the head heavenward so as to let the mouthful of liquid go
-down the throat, is what the hen will show her pupils by repeated
-examples. In imitating her, some giddy one will perhaps put its foot
-into the water or even fall into the plate, a fearful possibility for
-the inexperienced drinker. But the hen will dry the unfortunate one
-under her wings and show it another time how to manage better. To be
-brief, in a single short session the whole brood has been taught the
-two chief needs of this world, eating and drinking.”
-
-“They are scholars quick to learn,” said Jules. “It is true the
-prompting of the stomach, hunger, must have helped them.”
-
-“Hardly a week has passed before the young chickens are out of the coop
-and running around, though not to any great distance, for if one
-appears to want to go off the mother admonishes it and recalls it to
-more prudent ways. If she suspects the slightest danger she recalls
-them all to her retreat by a persuasive clucking. Immediately the
-little chickens scamper back, squeeze between the bars or crawl under
-the lifted end of the coop, and regain the refuge where no intruders
-can penetrate. When the time comes for these first sallies outside the
-coop, the hen can be set free and allowed to lead her family where she
-pleases.
-
-“One of the most interesting sights of the farm is that of the hen at
-the head of her young chickens. With a slow step, measured by the
-feebleness of her brood, she goes hither and thither on the chance of
-finding something of value to her, always with vigilant eye and
-attentive ear. She clucks with a voice made hoarse by her maternal
-exertions; she scratches to dig up little seeds which the young ones
-come and take from under her beak. Here is a good place chanced upon in
-the sunshine for a rest from walking and for getting warm. The hen
-crouches down, ruffles up her plumage and slightly raises her wings,
-arching them in a sort of vault. All run and squat under the warm
-cover. Two or three put their heads out of the window, their pretty
-heads, all alert, framed in their mother’s somber plumage. One, in its
-boldness, settles down on her back, and from this elevated position
-pecks the hen’s neck; the others, the great majority, hide in her down
-and sleep or peep softly. The siesta finished, they resume their
-promenade, the mother scratching and clucking, the little ones trotting
-around her.
-
-“But what is this? It is the shadow of a bird of prey, which for a
-moment has darkened the sunshine of the courtyard. The menacing
-apparition did not last more than the twinkling of an eye; nevertheless
-the hen saw it. Danger threatens, the rapacious bird is not far away.
-At the note of alarm the young chickens hasten to take refuge under the
-mother, who makes a rampart for them of her wings. And now the ravisher
-may come. This mother, so feeble, so timid, that a mere nothing would
-put her to flight on all other occasions, becomes imposingly audacious
-where her brood is concerned. Let the goshawk appear, and the hen, full
-of tenderness and intrepidity, will throw herself in front of the
-terrible talons. By the beating of her wings, her redoubled cries, her
-furious pecks with her beak, she will hold her own against the bird of
-prey, until at last it beats a retreat, repulsed by this indomitable
-resistance.
-
-“The attachment of the hen to her young is shown in another very
-remarkable circumstance. As she is an excellent brooder, they sometimes
-give her ducks’ eggs to hatch. The hen brings up her adopted family as
-she would her own; she exercises the same care over the little ducks as
-she would over chickens of her own. All goes well as long as the
-ducklings, covered with a velvety yellow down, conform to the ways of
-their nurse and run under her wing at the first summons. But a time
-comes when their aquatic instinct awakens. They smell the pond, the
-neighboring pond, where the frog croaks and the tadpole frisks. They go
-waddling along, one after another, the old hen following them in
-ignorance of their project. They reach the pond and dash into the
-water. Then it is that the hen, believing the very lives of her little
-ones in peril, gives vent to the most desperate outcry. In her mortal
-terror the poor mother races in distraction along the bank, her voice
-hoarse with emotion, her plumage bristling with fear. She calls,
-menaces, supplicates. An angry red mounts to her comb, the fire of
-despair illumines her eye. She even goes—miracle of mother love—she
-even goes so far as to risk one foot in the water, that perfidious
-element, the sight of which makes her almost faint with fear. But to
-all her supplications the little ducklings turn a deaf ear, happy in
-their pursuit of the silver-bellied tadpole among the cresses.”
-
-“Oh, the little rascals,” exclaimed Emile, “not to listen to their
-nurse’s warnings! However, as they are ducks they can’t get along
-without water.”
-
-“They go there very often alone at first, in spite of the hen’s
-remonstrances; then, reassured by the first attempts, she willingly
-leads them to the bath and from the bank watches their joyful gambols.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VIII
-
-THE POULARD [2]
-
-
-“In a month the young chickens are strong enough to do without the
-tender care of their early days. The pap, the dainty dish of
-hard-boiled eggs mixed with lettuce and bread crumbs, is no longer
-served to them, but their rations consist simply of grain and green
-stuff. This kind of weaning is not effected without some regret on
-their part at the remembrance of the pap; but the mother makes amends
-for it by teaching them to scratch the earth and seek insects and
-worms, a royal feast for them. She shows them how a fly should be
-snapped up when warming itself in the sun against the wall; how the
-worm is to be caught and drawn from the ground before it goes into its
-hole. She shows them in what manner to proceed in order to derive the
-largest profit from a tuft of grass where the ants have stored their
-eggs; with what nice attention they must search the under side of large
-leaves where various insects are in hiding. How to carry out little
-predatory excursions in the neighboring cultivated fields when
-opportunity offers, how to scratch up the newly made garden-plots and
-rummage in every nook and corner, pillaging here and pilfering
-there—this, too, is all comprised in the educational curriculum
-prepared by the careful mother. After a couple of weeks of such
-practice the pupils are past masters; they lose the name of chickens
-and take that of pullets and roosters. Then the family disbands, the
-hen returning to her laying of eggs, and the chickens, thenceforth
-expert in the difficult science of earning their living, being left to
-themselves.
-
-“Very diverse fates await them. Some, fortune’s favorites, will grow
-peacefully to increase the poultry-yard; others, more numerous, as soon
-as they are large enough will be given over to the kitchen knife; some,
-chosen from those easiest to fatten, will undergo a diet that will make
-them peculiarly suitable for the table. Let me tell you to-day through
-what grievous trials the poor bird passes to become, by artificial aid,
-the plump, fat, succulent fowl that we call a poulard.”
-
-“Then a poulard is not a separate species of hen?” asked Jules.
-
-“No, my friend. The poulard is only an ordinary hen artificially
-subjected to a kind of life that fattens it. All species do not lend
-themselves with equal success to this artificial fattening; the best
-known in this respect is that of la Flèche, which furnishes the
-celebrated poulard of Mans.
-
-“I have already told you a few words about this species, which is
-distinguished from the others by its dashing appearance and long legs.
-The plumage is entirely black, touched with glints of violet and green.
-The cock carries proudly, for comb, two horns of brilliant red flesh;
-its wattles are pendent and very long. The hen has two similar but
-shorter horns; her wattles are small and rounded; finally, her legs
-have not the disproportionate length of the cock’s tall stilts. Such
-are the patients preëminently destined for the cruel industry of
-fattening. Let us come now to the practice of it.
-
-“The greatest care in this world is that of the family. You know with
-what continual and laborious solicitude the hen watches over her little
-ones, with what self-sacrifice the mother spends herself in order to
-keep her nest of eggs warm. If pains were not taken to remove her from
-the nest and make her eat, she would let herself starve to death,
-sacrificing her own life for the sake of her eggs. Is it possible for a
-bird to take on flesh with such ardent maternal love burning in her
-veins? Certainly not. The first condition for becoming large and fat is
-to consider one’s self alone, a thing permitted only to the beast whose
-end is to become an excellent roast.
-
-“Well, in order that the hen may consider solely herself, think of
-nothing but eating and digesting well, so as to take on fat and flesh
-abundantly, it is put out of her power to lay, which in turn takes from
-her all idea of brooding and of raising young chickens. Out of a
-mother, ready to devote herself unstintingly, is made a brute that, if
-only its crop be full, has no care of any kind; in fact, a veritable
-fat-factory. The operation is a cruel one. With the blade of a penknife
-a slight incision is made in the stomach, and the organ in which the
-eggs are formed is removed. With a little care the slight wound soon
-heals, and the mutilated bird is ready for the life of a poulard. Let
-loose in the poultry-yard, it has henceforth nothing to do but eat,
-digest, and sleep; sleep, digest, and eat. Leading such a life, the
-bird soon begins to grow fat. Things go all the better and quicker,
-however, if the bird cannot move freely, cannot come and go at will;
-for it is to be remarked that no more than love of offspring does love
-of liberty fatten those that feel its generous ardor. You will ponder
-that later, my children, when you are older. So they confine the
-poulards in coops.”
-
-“What sort of coops?” asked Emile.
-
-“They are low cages divided into cells, with one poulard to a cell.
-Crouching in its narrow compartment, the fowl cannot move or even turn
-round. Solid partitions bar the view except in front near the
-feed-trough, and prevent its seeing its neighbors, its companions in
-confinement, so that nothing may distract it from its ceaseless work of
-digestion. The cage is placed in a room heated to a mild temperature,
-far from all noise and in a semi-obscurity which induces sleep, so
-favorable to the functions of the stomach. At punctually regulated
-hours, far enough apart for appetite to be aroused, but near enough
-together to prevent its becoming actual hunger, which would impair the
-well-being of the stomach and hinder the fattening of the bird, three
-meals a day are served in the feed-trough. Raw beets, cooked potatoes,
-crushed grain, curdled milk, barley, wheat, maize, buckwheat, compose
-the menu in turn, so as to excite by variety and choice of food an
-appetite that satiety daily makes more languishing. Thus fed to
-repletion, the poor creature, with nothing to distract it from the
-filling of its crop, eats to pass the time, falls asleep from sheer
-stupor, awakes, and begins to eat again, only to fall asleep once more.
-Toward the end of this treatment the poulard, gorged beyond measure,
-refuses to eat any more. To arouse the last feeble promptings of
-appetite recourse is had to more delicate food, calculated to keep
-alive a few days longer the desire for nourishment. For solid food a
-dough of fine flour is served, and for liquid refreshment, milk, pure
-milk, if you please. If the bird, already stuffed to bursting,
-positively refuses to eat any more, it is made to eat by force.”
-
-“By force?” said Emile, “when it is bursting and can eat no more?”
-
-“Yes, my friend, by force. Willy, nilly, it must still swallow for some
-days longer, after which comes the end of its miseries. It is killed
-and appears on the table as a tender and juicy roast abounding in fat.
-
-“This forced feeding is the essential feature in the method followed to
-obtain the renowned poulards of Mans.
-
-“According to the masters of this art, the process is as follows:
-Without preliminary subjection to the mutilation I spoke of, the fowls
-are placed in narrow cages in a warm, dark room, the doors and windows
-of which have been made tight to prevent the free circulation of air.
-For food, a mixture of barley-flour, oats, and buckwheat is moistened
-with milk, and the dough is divided into little pieces or oblong balls
-shaped like an olive and of about the length of the little finger. At
-meal times, which must be very regular, the feeder takes three hens at
-a time, ties them together by the legs, puts them on his knees, and, by
-the light of a lamp, begins by making them swallow a spoonful of water
-or whey; then, taking them by turns, he introduces a bolus into the
-beak of each of the hens, and to facilitate the descent of the large
-pieces he presses lightly with his fingers, passing from the base of
-the beak down to the crop. While the bird that has been fed is
-recovering from its painful deglutition, the two others are treated in
-the same manner. To this first ball are added a second, a third, and so
-on up to a dozen or fifteen, all put into the beak and swallowed
-willingly or otherwise. Their crops sufficiently full, the three hens
-are replaced in their cages, where they have nothing to do but sleep
-and peacefully digest their copious meal. The others go through the
-same treatment, three by three, in a fixed order.”
-
-“And if the crop is stuffed too full with these twelve or fifteen lumps
-of dough,” asked Jules, “may not the bird die, choked with food?”
-
-“There is no great danger; all will go well. Remember the bird’s
-astonishing powers of digestion and the experiments I related to you on
-this subject.”
-
-“It is true that a gizzard capable of getting rid of leaden balls stuck
-with needles or lancets ought easily to dispose of a few lumps of
-dough.”
-
-“Besides, heed is taken not to go beyond the fowl’s digestive powers. A
-halt is called as soon as the crop appears to be full. It takes from
-six weeks to two months of this treatment to bring the poulard to
-perfection.”
-
-“I am too fond of the poulard served up as a choice roast to speak ill
-of what I have just heard; nevertheless I will admit, Uncle, that this
-barbarous fattening process is repulsive to me. I pity those poor
-things crouching there in the dark, in cells where they cannot move,
-and forcibly crammed with food until almost stuffed to death.”
-
-“This sympathy proceeds from a good disposition, and I approve of it;
-but, after all, what is to be done? Since we need the poulard, we must
-needs countenance the process by which the hen is turned into the
-poulard. Our life is sustained by animal life. Therefore all that our
-pity can do is to lessen as much as possible the unavoidable suffering
-and, above all, see to it that the victims of our needs do not become
-also the victims of a useless and stupid brutality.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IX
-
-THE TURKEY
-
-
-“Of our barnyard fowls, the turkey is the most remarkable except the
-peacock, which is raised only for the incomparable richness of its
-plumage. The turkey-gobbler has his head and neck covered with bare
-bluish skin, embellished behind with white nipples and in front with
-red ones, which swell and hang down in large pendants, resembling
-sealing wax in color. Over his beak falls a piece of flesh, short and
-wrinkled when the bird is in repose, hanging far down and of brilliant
-coloring when he wishes to display his charms. In the middle of his
-breast is fastened an unkempt sort of mane. To show off, he bridles up,
-inflates his red pendants, elongates the piece of flesh over his beak,
-throws his head back, spreads out his tail feathers in the shape of a
-wheel, and lets the tips of his half-opened wings trail on the ground.
-In this grotesquely proud posture he turns slowly to let himself be
-admired from all sides. From time to time a low sound, puff-puff,
-accompanied by a sort of convulsive stretching of the wings, is the
-sign of his supreme satisfaction. If some noise, especially whistling,
-disturbs him, he hauls down his colors and, stretching his neck,
-hastily gives a gloo-gloo-gloo that seems to burst from the very depths
-of his stomach.”
-
-“By whistling to the turkeys feeding in the fields,” said Emile, “I can
-make them repeat their cry as often as I want to. The turkey hens do
-not say gloo-gloo; they peep plaintively.”
-
-“This fowl is a recent acquisition of our poultry-yards,” resumed Uncle
-Paul. “It came to us from North America in the sixteenth century. As
-America was called West Indies in contrast with the Asian or East
-Indies, the bird originating in the forests of the New World was called
-the Indian cock (coq d’Inde) and the Indian hen (poule d’Inde); from
-which have come the French terms dindon and dinde. For a long time the
-bird spread but little; it was raised merely as a curious rarity. The
-first that appeared on the table was, they say, at the wedding feast of
-Charles IX.
-
-“The turkey lived, and still lives to-day, in a wild state, in the
-forests of the United States of North America. Its habits are described
-by a celebrated naturalist, Audubon, [3] who, with his gun on his
-shoulder, his notebook, pencil, and brushes in his game-bag, traversed
-the most secluded solitudes in order to observe, paint, and describe
-birds.
-
-“‘The nest,’ he tells us, ‘which consists of a few withered leaves, is
-placed on the ground, in a hollow scooped out by the side of a log, or
-in the fallen top of a dry leafy tree, under a thicket of sumach or
-briars, or a few feet within the edge of a cane-brake, but always in a
-dry place.... When depositing her eggs, the female always approaches
-the nest with extreme caution, scarcely ever taking the same course
-twice, and when about to leave them covers them carefully with leaves,
-so that it is very difficult for a person who may have seen the bird to
-discover the nest....
-
-“‘The mother will not leave her eggs when near hatching, under any
-circumstances, while life remains. She will even allow an enclosure to
-be made around her, and thus suffer imprisonment, rather than abandon
-them. I once witnessed the hatching of a brood of turkeys, which I
-watched for the purpose of securing them together with the parent. I
-concealed myself on the ground within a very few feet, and saw her
-raise herself half the length of her legs, look anxiously upon the
-eggs, cluck with a sound peculiar to the mother on such occasions,
-carefully remove each half-empty shell, and with her bill caress and
-dry the young birds, that already stood tottering and attempting to
-make their way out of the nest. Yes, I have seen this, and have left
-mother and young to better care than mine could have proved—to the care
-of their Creator and mine. I have seen them all emerge from the shell,
-and, in a few moments after, tumble, roll, and push each other forward,
-with astonishing and inscrutable instinct.’”
-
-“That’s the kind of hunter I like,” declared Jules; “one who knows how
-to restrain himself at the touching sight of a nest of young birds.
-What did you say his name was?”
-
-“Audubon.”
-
-“I shan’t forget that name again.”
-
-“And that will be right, for few observers have discoursed on birds
-with so much sympathetic understanding as he.
-
-“I continue to draw from his account. ‘About the beginning of October,’
-says he, ‘when scarcely any of the seeds and fruits have yet fallen
-from the trees, these birds assemble in flocks, and gradually move
-towards the rich bottom lands of the Ohio and Mississippi.... When they
-come upon a river, they betake themselves to the highest eminences, and
-there often remain a whole day, or sometimes two, as if for the purpose
-of consultation. During this time, the males are heard gobbling,
-calling, and making much ado, and are seen strutting about, as if to
-raise their courage to a pitch befitting the emergency. Even the
-females and young assume something of the same pompous demeanor, spread
-out their tails, and run round each other, purring loudly, and
-performing extravagant leaps. At length, when the weather appears
-settled, and all around is quiet, the whole party mounts to the tops of
-the highest trees, whence, at a signal, consisting of a single cluck,
-given by a leader, the flock takes flight for the opposite shore. The
-old and fat birds easily get over, even should the river be a mile in
-breadth; but the younger and less robust frequently fall into the
-water—not to be drowned, however, as might be imagined. They bring
-their wings close to their body, spread out their tail as a support,
-stretch forward their neck, and striking out their legs with great
-vigor, proceed rapidly toward the shore; on approaching which, should
-they find it too steep for landing, they cease their exertions for a
-few moments, float down the stream until they come to an accessible
-part, and by a violent effort extricate themselves from the water. It
-is remarkable that, immediately after thus crossing a large stream,
-they ramble about for some time, as if bewildered. In this state, they
-fall an easy prey to the hunter.
-
-“‘Of the numerous enemies of the wild turkey, the most formidable,
-excepting man, are the lynx, the snowy owl, and the Virginia owl.... As
-turkeys usually roost in flocks, on naked branches of trees, they are
-easily discovered by their enemies, the owls, which, on silent wing,
-approach and hover around them for the purpose of reconnoitering. This,
-however, is rarely done without being discovered, and a single cluck
-from one of the turkeys announces to the whole party the approach of
-the murderer. They instantly start upon their legs, and watch the
-motions of the owl, which, selecting one as its victim, comes down upon
-it like an arrow, and would inevitably secure the turkey, did not the
-latter at that moment lower its head, stoop, and spread its tail in an
-inverted manner over its back, by which action the aggressor is met by
-a smooth inclined plane, along which it glances without hurting the
-turkey; immediately after which the latter drops to the ground, and
-thus escapes, merely with the loss of a few feathers.’”
-
-“To make a breastplate of the tail spread out like a wheel is a very
-ingenious means of defense,” remarked Emile. “The turkey is not so
-foolish as people think.”
-
-“It is so far from being foolish that we have not in the poultry-yard a
-more impassioned lover of liberty. In their native country turkeys
-wander through the great woods from morning to night in untiring search
-of insects and fat larvæ, fruit and seeds of all kinds, acorns and nuts
-especially, of which they are very fond. Thus the stay-at-home habits
-of the poultry-yard do not suit them at all. They must have the open
-air of the fields and the exercise of long walks. Moors, woods, hills
-abounding in grasshoppers, are their favorite haunts. Their timid
-nature makes them very docile. A child armed with a long switch is
-enough to lead the flock to the fields, however numerous it may be.
-Then, step by step, to-day in one direction, to-morrow in another, the
-flock explores the stubble and gleans the grain fallen from the ear,
-traverses the grassy meadows where the crickets leap, and penetrates
-the woods where is found abundant pasturage of chestnuts, beechnuts,
-and acorns.
-
-“In spite of these rambles afield, which remind it a little of the
-wandering life it leads in the immense forests of its native country,
-the turkey never acquires in domesticity the plumpness of body and
-richness of plumage that belong to it in its free state. It is a
-curious fact that, contrary to all our experience with other animals,
-which have improved under human care and have increased in size, the
-turkey alone has degenerated in our hands, as if preyed upon by an
-ineradicable regret for its native forests, where bellows the buffalo,
-chased by the red-skinned Indian. The domestic turkey is not much more
-than half as large as the wild one. And then what a difference in the
-plumage! Our poultry-yard fowl is of a uniform black or of a dull red,
-sometimes white. The bird of the wooded solitudes of the New World is
-splendid in costume. Bronzed brown predominates, but the neck, throat,
-and back have, in the light, metallic reflections; and as the plumage
-is clearly imbricated, the whole gives the appearance of scale armor in
-gold and steel. Furthermore, the large wing-feathers have a pure white
-spot on the tip.”
-
-“From that description,” said Jules, “I see well enough that the bird
-has not gained by living with us.”
-
-“Nor has its flesh gained in nutritive quality, that of the wild turkey
-being considered incomparably superior.”
-
-“It is just the opposite with the common hen,” observed Louis.
-“Originally as small as the partridge and with as little flesh, it has
-developed into the fat poulard.”
-
-“Such as it is,” said Uncle Paul, “the domestic turkey is none the
-less, next to the common fowl, the most valuable acquisition of the
-poultry-yard. Let us now turn our attention to it.
-
-“The laying of its eggs takes place in April, when about twenty to a
-nest are laid, of a dull white with reddish spots. These eggs are
-scarcely ever used as food; not that they are bad—far from it—but they
-are too precious and too few to be converted into omelets. As fast as
-the turkey-hen lays them they are gathered and kept in a basket lined
-with hay or old rags until the time for setting. The gathering of these
-eggs is not always easy. Faithful to her wild habits, the turkey-hen
-does not willingly accept the poultry-house nest. She steals away to
-lay her eggs in neighboring straw-ricks, underbrush, and hedges. One
-must watch her proceedings therefore, foil her ruses, and from time to
-time visit her favorite haunts.
-
-“Incubation presents no difficulties, the female turkey being so good a
-brooder. Like the common hen, she devotes herself to her eggs with
-passionate love; like the hen, too, while setting she forgets her food,
-so that she must be taken off the nest every day and made to eat and
-drink, as otherwise she might let herself die of hunger. The little
-ones hatch at the end of thirty days. There is nothing more delicate
-than these new-born chicks; the least cold chills them, a shower of
-rain is fatal to them, even the dew imperils their lives, and a hot sun
-kills them in a trice. If there is delay in feeding, and the mother, of
-ponderous bulk, awkwardly plants her feet in the midst of her numerous
-offspring, then the greedy little things are liable to be trampled on
-and crushed to death. Another danger awaits them at the age of two or
-three months. Young turkeys hatch with the heads covered with down,
-with no sign of the red nipples that will ornament them later. Within
-two or three months these nipples, real collars, and pendants of coral
-begin to show; they say then that the red is starting. At this time
-there takes place in the bird a painful change which to many is mortal,
-especially in a damp season. To succor the sick ones, they are made to
-swallow a few mouthfuls of warm wine. All things considered, there are
-numberless chances of death for the turkey-hen’s brood. Add to that the
-small number of eggs laid, and we can understand why, in spite of its
-great utility, the turkey is less common than the ordinary fowl.
-
-“Audubon has told us that when, from his concealment in the bushes, he
-witnessed the mother turkey’s anxious procedure, the young ones left
-the nest almost as soon as the shell was broken. For a moment the
-mother warms and dries them under her breast; then, trotting and
-tumbling, they abandon the bed of leaves, never to return. In
-domesticity it is much the same; no sooner are they hatched than the
-little turkeys leave the nest and thenceforth have no other shelter
-than the cover of their mother, who protects them under her wings
-exactly as the hen protects her brood. She also takes the same care of
-her family, exercises the same vigilance in foreseeing danger, shows
-the same audacity in coping with the bird of prey. For the first few
-days the refuge afforded by the wide and deep coop, so useful to the
-little chickens, is not less useful to the young turkeys. The
-hen-turkey is put there with choice provisions, and the little ones are
-free to come and go as they please. These provisions consist of a pap
-similar to that given to young chickens and composed of bread-crumbs,
-curds, chopped salad leaves and nettles, a little bran, and hard-boiled
-eggs. Later comes grain, oats in particular. When the weather is fine
-the coop is put out of doors in a sunny spot, on very dry ground, and
-the brood is allowed to play about for a couple of hours in the middle
-of the day. Great care must be taken to avoid rain, dew, and dampness;
-a wet turkey chick is in grave danger.
-
-“The more delicate the bird at the beginning, the more robust it is
-when it has successfully passed the period called the red. It no longer
-needs the shelter of the poultry-house at night. However cold it may
-be, it sleeps in the open air, roosting on the branches of some dead
-tree or on a perch fixed to the wall. Vainly does the north wind
-whistle and the frost nip; the turkey rests peacefully in the manner of
-its fellows in the woods of America, and without fear lest a snow-owl
-come to disturb its slumbers and compel it to spread its tail quickly
-and make a breastplate against the marauder’s talons.
-
-“I will finish this story with a few words on a curious method of
-fattening used in certain countries, especially in Provence, Morvan,
-and Flanders. Over and above the usual food that fattening birds eat
-voluntarily, they force both the gobbler and the hen to swallow whole
-nuts.”
-
-“Whole, but without the shell?” queried Emile.
-
-“No, my friend; with the shell too; in fact, nuts just as the tree
-bears them.”
-
-“A nut with the shell, no matter how small, must make a hard mouthful
-to swallow, and still harder to digest.”
-
-“I don’t deny it; but finally, with the finger pushing the nut a little
-into the throat, and the hand gently pressing from the base of the beak
-to the crop, the voluminous mouthful ends by going down, not without
-some grimaces on the part of the bird.”
-
-“And reason enough for them!” exclaimed Emile.
-
-“One nut would be nothing; but that is not all. The next day they force
-it to swallow two, the next three, and so on, augmenting the dose each
-day. In Provence they stop at forty nuts a day; elsewhere they go on to
-a hundred.”
-
-“And the turkey does not die, stuffed thus with nuts as large and hard
-as stones?” asked Jules.
-
-“You would be pleased to see how the bird prospers and fattens on food
-that would choke any other creature.”
-
-“With a hundred nuts in its crop, or even only forty,” was Louis’s
-comment, “the turkey can’t be very comfortable.”
-
-“They are not swallowed all at one time, but in portions during the
-day.”
-
-“No matter,” persisted Jules; “if you hadn’t already told us, according
-to that learned Italian—Wait a minute; what was his name?”
-
-“The abbot Spallanzani.”
-
-“Yes, the abbot Spallanzani. If you hadn’t told us about his
-experiments and the wonderful power of the gizzard, I should never be
-able to understand how a turkey could manage to digest nuts, shell and
-all, up to forty and even a hundred a day.”
-
-“Everything is reduced to a sort of soup in the gizzard—shells and
-kernels; all becomes as soft as butter; and the bird, fat as a pig,
-finally serves as the chief dish at the Christmas feast.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER X
-
-THE GUINEA-FOWL
-
-
-“Once upon a time—That begins, you see, like the stories of Cinderella
-and of the Ass’s Skin. Are we going to spend our time in the recital of
-the wonders of some fairy godmother? Not at all. I am simply going to
-tell you the story of the guinea-fowl; and this story happens to be
-connected, in its first part, with a certain fable told thousands and
-thousands of years ago, in the evening by the fire-side, to little
-boys, just as to-day you are told the tragic adventures of Hop o’ my
-Thumb with the Ogre. I start again then.
-
-“In that corner of the world known as Greece, a corner so illustrious
-in ages long past, there was once upon a time a valiant young man, son
-of the king of the country, whose favorite occupation was hunting. I
-say occupation and not recreation, because in those hard times when
-industrial pursuits were just beginning, the country was overrun with
-wild animals from which one had constantly to defend oneself and one’s
-flock, only recently herded together under the shepherd’s crook. At the
-risk of their own lives brave men undertook this harsh duty. Many
-succumbed to it, some acquired renown great enough to survive the lapse
-of centuries and come down to our time. Surrounded by a heroic aureole,
-the names of these ancient slayers of monsters have reached us. Such is
-the name of Meleager, borne by the young man I just mentioned.
-
-“The skin of a wild beast on his back for clothing, in his hand a stout
-stake sharpened to a point and hardened in the fire, on his shoulder a
-quiver full of arrows pointed with little sharp stones, in his belt a
-bludgeon of hard wood and a stone hatchet sharpened on the sandstone,
-the ardent hunter ranged over the country, tracking the formidable
-animals to their very lairs in dark forests and mountain caves
-overgrown with an impenetrable barrier of reeds.”
-
-“Why didn’t those men,” asked Emile, “if they had to fight such
-ferocious animals, use something better than sharpened sticks and
-stone-pointed arrows? Why didn’t they take regular firearms?”
-
-“For the very best of reasons: metals were unknown, and iron, one of
-the latest to be discovered, was not used by man until long after this
-time. Men armed themselves, therefore, as best they could, with the
-point of a bone or the sharp edge of a broken stone.”
-
-“I understand, then,” said Louis, “how dangerous such hunts must have
-been, and how courageous the hunters. To-day one would cut a sorry
-figure attacking a wolf with only a sharpened stake for a weapon.”
-
-“And how would it be if one found oneself face to face with the wild
-boar of which Meleager rid the country? According to the old writers
-who handed down the affair to us, it was an animal such as had never
-been seen before and will never be seen again. Heaven, in its wrath,
-had sent it to ravage the fields. It surpassed in size, they say, the
-strongest bulls. From its bloodshot eyes lightning darted; from its
-horrible mouth exhaled a fiery breath that instantly withered the
-leaves of trees; with a few blows of its snout it uprooted oaks; with
-its tusks, more formidable than the elephant’s, it ripped up the earth
-and sent great masses of rock flying like so much dust. What became of
-the poor people when this brute rushed at them in all its fury? They
-all fled, wild with terror, their hands upraised to heaven, their
-voices choked with fright.”
-
-“There must be some exaggeration there,” interposed Louis. “A wild boar
-does not grow to such a size and such strength.”
-
-“Yes, certainly, there is exaggeration in this as in many other stories
-in which the real facts, coming down through long centuries, finally
-become greatly magnified and take on most marvelous additions. Let us
-bring things back to something like probability. An enormous wild boar
-sets the country in a panic. For a people unprovided with good weapons
-and having no refuge but fragile huts of reed, it must be a very
-dangerous situation.
-
-“To exorcise the common peril, Meleager calls together the best men in
-the neighborhood and places himself at the head of the hunters, among
-whom are to be found two of his uncles, his mother’s brothers, violent
-men and very jealous of the fame their nephew has already acquired by
-his valorous exploits. They go to meet the monster. The first to
-approach the beast pay for their temerity with their lives. Already
-several have been made to bite the dust, without any result, when
-Meleager, more fortunate and no doubt also more skilful, succeeds in
-stabbing the beast with his stake. Victory is his, and the boar should
-belong to him, or at least the head, as a trophy of his courage; but
-his uncles, furious at their nephew’s acquisition of a new title to
-fame in addition to so many former ones, do not look at it in that
-light. The dispute becomes heated, and, as usual in those brutal times,
-the disputants pass quickly from argument to blows. Meleager, beside
-himself with wrath, kills his two uncles with the same stake that has
-drunk the blood of the beast.”
-
-“Oh, wretched man!” cried Jules.
-
-“Evil overtook him. On hearing of the death of her two brothers,
-Meleager’s mother loses her reason from grief. She draws from a
-cupboard, where she has kept it with the greatest care, a firebrand
-blackened at one end. With a hand trembling with anguish, she takes
-this firebrand, this precious firebrand for which hitherto she would
-have given her very eyes, life itself, and throws it into the fire,
-where it is straightway consumed. Ah, what has she done, the unhappy
-mother, what has she done! At that moment her son Meleager is dying,
-consumed by an inner fire; he is dying, he is dead, for the firebrand
-has just given its last flicker. In her despair the poor mother kills
-herself.
-
-“The connection between this firebrand that was reduced to ashes and
-Meleager’s end escapes you; I hasten to throw some light on this point.
-I will tell you then that at Meleager’s birth a firebrand suddenly
-sprang from beneath the ground and began to burn in the middle of the
-room, while a voice from the depths, like an infernal rumbling, said:
-‘This child will live until the firebrand is consumed.’”
-
-“Why, this is nothing but a fairy tale!” Jules exclaimed.
-
-“Very true. History here gives place to fable. Now the firebrand was
-burning on the floor and threatened soon to be entirely consumed. They
-hastened to pick it up and extinguish it with water. From that time the
-mother preserved it with the greatest care, as the most precious thing
-she had, persuaded that her son would live to a great age, when, crazed
-with grief at the news of her brothers’ death, she threw it into the
-fire. As the subterranean voice had said, the moment the firebrand was
-consumed Meleager succumbed, devoured by an inner fire.”
-
-“It’s a good story,” was Emile’s comment, “but I don’t at all see what
-it has to do with the guinea-fowl.”
-
-“You will see in a minute,” his uncle reassured him. “Inconsolable at
-the death of their brother, Meleager’s sisters unceasingly shed tears
-that rolled like pearls over their mourning garments; night and day
-they filled the house with their distressing sobs. Heaven had pity on
-them and changed them into birds until then unknown, into guinea-hens,
-whose plumage is still sprinkled with the tears of the unhappy girls,
-and whose unceasing cries are the continuation of their sobs. Such,
-according to the ancients, is the origin of guinea-fowls, called by
-them Meleagridæ in honor of the hero of the legend.
-
-“The childish imagination of the ancients elaborated this story of the
-metamorphosis of Meleager’s sisters out of the two most prominent
-traits of the guinea-fowl, its plumage and its cry. On a background of
-bluish gray, the color of mourning, are sprinkled innumerable round
-white spots. Those are the tears, running in pearly drops over the bird
-as they ran over the somber garments of the inconsolable sisters. The
-guinea-fowl’s voice is a discordant, continuous, unendurable cry, in
-which the fable recognizes, unquestioningly, the painful sobs of
-Meleager’s sisters.”
-
-“Those resemblances are ingenious,” said Louis, “but they do not take
-the place of real knowledge of the guinea-fowl’s origin. Not even in
-those old days could every one have believed in the singular tale you
-have just told us.”
-
-“Many were satisfied with it and sought no further information. And
-even in our day, my friend, in this so-called enlightened century, is
-it so unusual that the more absurd a thing is the more easily it takes
-root in our minds? Many were satisfied with the story, but the wise
-knew well that the bird came to us from Africa, and for that reason
-called it the African fowl.
-
-“These old names are now out of use and are replaced by the word
-guinea-fowl, or pintade, which some, not without reason write peintade
-(painted). In fact, the white spots, spread over the bluish-gray ground
-of the plumage, are so round and so regularly distributed that one
-might say they were traced with a brush by a painter. The bird looks
-painted; hence its name.
-
-“The guinea-fowl has rounded outlines. Its short wings, its drooping
-tail, and the general arrangement of the feathers on its back give it a
-deformed appearance, which is misleading, for when plucked the bird
-shows none of its former gibbosity. The neck is lank. Imitating in that
-respect its compatriot, the camel, the guinea-fowl straightens it up
-and stretches it out when it runs away, and then it looks like a
-rolling ball. The head is small and partly bald, like the turkey’s. Two
-wattles, tinted red and blue, hang from the base of the beak. The top
-of the skull is protected by dry skin, which rises in the shape of a
-helmet and is perhaps not without use when in their quarrelsome moods
-the guinea-fowls have a trial of skill in splitting one another’s head
-with blows of the beak.
-
-“Many qualities recommend this bird to our notice. The eggs are
-excellent and numerous, a hundred and more annually. They are a little
-smaller than the hen’s, with remarkably thick shells of a yellowish or
-dull reddish color. Its flesh is superior, veritable game, nearly equal
-to that of the pheasant and partridge; and yet the guinea-fowl is rare
-almost everywhere. Three great faults are the reason: its cry, its
-quarrelsome disposition, and its wandering habits.
-
-“First, its cry. He who has not had, for hours and hours, his ear
-tortured by the satanic music of the bird is ignorant of one of the
-most irritating of minor torments. The rasping of a file upon the teeth
-of a saw in process of sharpening, the discordant screech of a
-strangling cat, the final roulade of a braying donkey, are trifles in
-comparison. And this charivari goes on from morning to night with a
-reënforcement of the orchestra when the weather is about to change or
-something unexpected happens to worry the performers. If one is not
-blessed with a special ear, if the head is not void of all
-preoccupation, one simply cannot stand this deafening racket. They say
-the guinea-hens have inherited the wailings of Meleager’s sisters; but
-I like to think that the poor girls put a little more reserve into the
-heartbreaking expression of their grief. In short, never tell Uncle
-Paul to have guinea-hens under his window; he would flee to the
-farthest depths of the forest, never to return. There are others, and
-they are numerous, whose nerves are irritated just as much by the
-insufferable bird; that is why the guinea-fowl is rare in
-poultry-yards, and by reason of its music escapes the spit.
-
-“Second, its love of fighting. The parchment helmet standing up on top
-of the head betrays at the first glance the quarrelsome mania of the
-bird. The guinea-fowl is the bully of the poultry-yard; it domineers
-over the others and for a mere nothing will pick a quarrel. Hens and
-chickens are tormented for the possession of a grain of oats; the cock
-must on all occasions have a trial of skill with the beak to make his
-and his family’s rights respected; the turkey-gobbler himself, the
-burly gobbler, must reckon with it. The guinea-cock, quick at attack,
-delivers ten assaults and twenty blows of the beak before his big
-adversary can put himself on the defensive. When at last the gobbler
-parries and thrusts, the turbulent aggressor makes use of tactics that
-he seems to have learned from his compatriot, the Arab. He turns his
-back on the enemy, flees in haste, then abruptly returns to the charge
-and hurls himself suddenly on the gobbler at a moment when the latter
-is off his guard. The beak having dealt its blow, the flight
-recommences. Nearly always the gobbler is forced to capitulate. I leave
-you to imagine what sort of harmony must prevail in a poultry-yard
-harboring such disturbers of the peace.
-
-“Third, its wanderlust. The narrow limits of the poultry-yard are
-irksome to guinea-fowls. They are glad enough to be on hand at feeding
-time, but, their crops once full, they must have a long walk across
-country. Off they go, always by themselves, without ever admitting the
-common poultry to their ranks. To the music of its harsh chatter the
-flock goes on from one hedge to another, one bush to the next, snapping
-up insects. The distraction of the hunt makes them forget distance, and
-soon they are beyond supervision. Let a dog appear, and these
-half-tamed game-birds are seized with a foolish panic. They fly in all
-directions, with a cry of alarm resembling the harsh note of a rattle.
-The disbanded flock will have much trouble in getting together again;
-perhaps when they do come together one or two will be missing. Another
-inconvenience no less grave: during these excursions the eggs are laid
-almost anywhere, in the wheat-field, on the broad meadow, amid the
-tangled underbrush. Except by attentive watching at the moment of
-laying, it would take a sharp eye to find the nest of the suspected
-bird.
-
-“The guinea-hen broods in about the same manner as the common hen, but
-it is preferable to set the eggs under a common hen; she will perform
-the imposed task perfectly and make no distinction between her own eggs
-and those of a stranger. The hatching takes place about the
-twenty-eighth or thirtieth day. On coming out of the shell, the little
-guinea-chicks can walk and eat alone quite as well as the other
-chickens. They need warmth and assiduous care. The first week they are
-fed with a pap of bread-crumbs and hard-boiled eggs, to which are added
-ants’ eggs or at least a little chopped meat. After that they have the
-same diet as ordinary chickens. Like young turkeys they pass through a
-critical period, the time when the red begins to show on the bald skin
-of the head. To pass through it well, the best way is to give them
-strengthening food and shelter them from all dampness.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XI
-
-THE PALMIPEDES
-
-
-“The workman is known by his tools, and by the tools of the feathered
-creatures—that is to say, their beaks and claws—their way of life is
-not less easily recognized. If it were not already known to us, who
-could fail to infer the carnivorous disposition of the hawk from the
-shape of its beak—short, sharp, and hooked—and from the structure of
-its talons, armed as they are with pointed nails grooved underneath
-with a narrow channel after the manner of certain daggers, to
-facilitate the flow of blood from the wound? Does it call for any
-extraordinary perspicacity to recognize, in the heron’s long legs,
-veritable stilts which enable it to traverse, step by step, without
-getting wet, the inundated flats, as does the hunter in his long,
-waterproof marsh boots? And then, that long beak, pointed like a nail,
-does it tell us nothing? Does it not say that the bird bores deep in
-the tufts of rushes and in the soft mud to pull out reptiles and
-worms?”
-
-“It is the heron,” put in Emile, “that the fable tells about when it
-says:
-
-
- “The long-necked, long-beaked heron went walking;
- On its stilt-like legs one day it went stalking.”
-
-
-“Yes,” said Uncle Paul, “that is the bird. Everything about the heron
-is long—legs, beak, neck. The length of its legs enables the bird to
-explore the swamp at its ease all day long without wetting a feather;
-its length of neck is needed that it may reach the ground without
-stooping; and the long beak is indispensable for burrowing in the tall
-tufts of grass where the reptile lurks, and for probing the mud where
-the worm buries itself.”
-
-“I begin to see now,” said Jules, “how the character of a bird may be
-judged from its shape. The heron bears its trade stamped on its form.”
-
-“The duck, in its turn, makes an equally unmistakable announcement. Let
-us forget its habits, which are so familiar to us, and try to
-rediscover them in the shape of the legs and beak.
-
-“The duck’s beak is very wide and flat, and round at the end. Shall we
-compare it with the hen’s beak, a slender pair of pincers that snaps up
-seeds and kernels one by one? Comparison is impossible. Do we see there
-a tool working in the manner of the heron’s pointed probe? Still less.
-Shall we make it the equivalent of the bloody hooked beak of the bird
-of prey? No one would dream of such a thing, so great is the
-difference. But one sees at once in this wide, rounded beak a spoon
-shaped expressly for scooping up food from the water, just as our
-table-spoons enable us to take out pieces of bread or lumps of rice
-swimming in a thin soup. The duck dabbles, then: it dips up water in
-large spoonfuls—that is to say, in beakfuls—and seeks its food therein.
-It is a soup of the thinnest sort and, in itself, of no nutritive
-value. Consequently the liquid that fills the bird’s mandible must be
-rejected, but at the same time it must be drained out in such a manner
-as to leave behind what little alimentary matter it may contain. For
-this purpose the edges of the beak are fringed with a row of thin,
-short blades which let the liquid run out when the bird has once filled
-its mouth.”
-
-“That’s an ingenious way to eat,” remarked Jules. “In order to snap up
-what it takes a fancy to, perhaps a tadpole, or a little water shell,
-or a worm, the duck is obliged to fill its beak with water. To swallow
-the whole mouthful without sorting would simply stuff the crop with a
-useless liquid. What does the bird do? It closes the beak, and the
-water, driven back, runs out through the fringed edges as if through a
-grating. The tadpole alone remains behind the grating, and goes down
-into the stomach.”
-
-“You can see, any time,” observed Louis, “the ducks on the pond dipping
-up water by the mouthful. It certainly isn’t just for drinking that
-they work their beaks so.”
-
-“Certainly not,” assented Uncle Paul; “they drain the water of the pond
-through the fringe of the beak to gather worms and other small aquatic
-prey.
-
-“The spoon-shaped beak of the duck indicates the bird’s dabbling
-habits; now let us see what the feet have to say. They are composed of
-three toes connected by an ample and supple membrane. Is that, I ask
-you, the footgear of a bird destined to long walks? With such a sole,
-so fine, so tender, and by its extent of surface exposing itself so
-much to the hardness of the stones, is the duck made for foot-racing?
-Note, on the contrary, the foot of the hen and the guinea-fowl, both
-untiring walkers. The toes are short, knotty, and sheathed with strong
-leather, without any connecting membrane. That is the true footgear of
-the pedestrian. But what will become of the duck on rough ground, with
-its wide sandals that a mere nothing can wound? You all know its
-pitiful walk. It waddles along, as ill at ease as a person afflicted
-with corns on the rough pavement of some of our streets. No, the duck
-is not made for walking.
-
-“But in water those expanded feet will make vigorous swimming oars. If
-the bird throws them out behind, they spread wide open merely with the
-resistance of the water; and their fan-shape gives them purchase enough
-to send the duck forward. When the duck draws them in again under its
-breast, they are closed automatically by the resistance of the liquid
-acting in a contrary direction; the membrane refolds in the manner of a
-closed umbrella, thus doing away with all shock or recoil. The twofold
-essential of a perfect oar lies in its presenting to the water the
-greatest possible surface on the stroke, and the least possible surface
-on the recovery, so as to furnish adequate purchase against the water
-in the first movement and to offer only very feeble resistance in the
-second. If the oar moved alternately forward and backward while
-presenting the same extent of surface to the water and driven with the
-same vigor, the recoil would equal the advance and there would be no
-progress. Man, with all his skill, does not yet know how to ply his oar
-so that it shall offer this alternating maximum and minimum of surface.
-Therefore, in propelling a boat, he is obliged to bring the oars back
-to their first position through the air instead of through the water,
-which latter would be much more direct. The duck scorns this clumsy
-method: with its foot, which opens wide of itself in the backward
-thrust and closes again of its own accord in the return movement, it
-moves forward or puts about, without ever lifting the oars from the
-water.
-
-“Thus the duck is an expert swimmer; the shape of its feet tells us as
-much, and a glance at any duck-pond demonstrates it. Who has not
-admired the aquatic evolutions of the bird, so awkward on land with its
-tender feet, so graceful when once on the water, its proper element?
-Sometimes they race with one another, whitening their breasts with a
-band of foam; sometimes, in order to explore the depths with their
-beaks, they plunge half-way in and point their tails heavenward;
-sometimes, also, yielding to the current, they let themselves drift
-idly down-stream or hold their position by paddling a few strokes when
-necessary. Water is their chosen domain; there they take their
-recreation, seek their food, and enjoy their sleep.
-
-“The membrane connecting the duck’s toes is called a web, and the feet
-converted into oars by means of this membrane are spoken of as webbed.
-Similar feet are found in all good swimming birds such as the swan,
-teal, goose, and many others. Hence this group of birds, especially
-skilled in swimming, is designated by the term of palmipede, meaning
-web-footed.”
-
-“Then the duck is a palmipede?” asked Emile.
-
-“It is a palmipede, as also the goose, swan, and teal. All four are
-equally endowed with a large spoon-bill shaped for dabbling in the
-water; that is to say, a wide, round beak; but there are palmipedes,
-notably among sea-birds, that live on prey, on fish, and consequently
-are equipped with the crooked mandible appropriate for a predatory
-life. Such, to take but a single example, is the albatross, of which I
-here show you the picture. By its ferociously hooked beak it can easily
-be recognized as a sea pirate, an insatiable devourer of fish.”
-
-“I certainly don’t like its looks,” declared Emile. “But tell me now
-what name they give the heron on its tall stilts.”
-
-“The heron belongs to the group of stilt-birds or wading-birds. That is
-what they call all birds mounted on long legs for traversing the
-marshes.”
-
-“A bird on stilts is a stilt-bird; it would be hard to improve on that.
-It is just the kind of name I like.”
-
-“Instead of allowing ourselves to be turned from our theme by the heron
-and its stilts, let us come back, my little friend, to the palmipedes,
-the swimming birds. Clothing made expressly for the purpose is required
-by the bird that passes the greater part of its time on the water. It
-is indispensable that this clothing should keep out both cold and wet.
-Well, the plumage of an aquatic bird, especially in very cold
-countries, is a marvel of delicate precautions. The outside feathers
-are strong, placed very accurately one on the other and glossed with an
-oily varnish that water cannot wet. Have you ever noticed ducks as they
-come out of the water? They may have prolonged their bath for hours,
-swimming, diving, playing; but they leave the stream without getting
-the least bit wet. If a drop of water has got between their feathers,
-they have only to shake themselves a moment, and they are perfectly
-dry. That, you must agree, is a precious privilege, to be able to go
-into the water and not get wet.”
-
-“A privilege that, for my part,” rejoined Emile, “I have often envied
-without being able to explain—the secret of a duck’s keeping dry when
-right in the water.”
-
-“I will explain the secret to you. Watch the ducks as they come out of
-their bath. In the sun, some lying at ease on their stomachs, others
-standing up, they proceed to make their toilet with minute care. With
-their large beak they smooth their feathers, one by one, coat them over
-with an oily fluid, the reservoir of which is situated on the bird’s
-rump. There, just at the base of the tail, is found, hidden under the
-down, a kind of wart of grease, from which oil oozes constantly. From
-time to time the beak presses the wart, draws from the oily reservoir,
-and then distributes here and there, methodically, all over the
-plumage, the oil thus obtained.”
-
-“That greasy wart might be called a sort of pomatum pot,” suggested
-Emile.
-
-“It is a pomatum pot, if that comparison pleases you. Thus greased,
-thus anointed with pomatum, feather by feather, the duck furnishes no
-foothold for moisture, because, as you all know, water and oil do not
-mix, and from an oiled surface drops of water run off without wetting
-it. Such is the secret of the duck’s keeping itself dry when immersed
-in water.”
-
-“That is one of the most curious things I ever heard of,” declared
-Jules, “and one that I shouldn’t have known anything about for a long
-time if it hadn’t been for Uncle Paul. Should I ever have guessed that
-the duck presses a certain wart on its rump to get the grease for
-oiling its feathers?”
-
-“The duck’s secret is known to all birds without exception; all have
-this oil-sac on the rump, and obtain from it the oil for giving luster
-to their plumage and making it impervious to wet; but aquatic birds are
-more abundantly provided in this respect. And it is only right that
-those most exposed to dampness should have the largest reservoir of
-this oily coating.”
-
-“In all birds the fattest part is always the rump,” said Louis. “Grease
-gathers there by preference, no doubt, to maintain the store of oil in
-the oil-sac?”
-
-“Evidently. It is in this storehouse that the oil attains its perfect
-state and becomes the finished product that oozes from the sac. As to
-the making of it in the first place, nearly all parts of the body take
-part; and as the swimming bird uses a great deal of this pomatum, the
-result is that the palmipede tends to fatness and, as it were, sweats
-grease: witness the plump duck and goose, which carry under the breast
-a heavy, fat swelling. As a general rule, the web-footed fowl of our
-poultry-yards is analogous to the pig: it is a fat-factory. We divert
-to our own use the excess of fat accumulated primarily for the supply
-of the oil-sac on the rump and the maintenance of the luster that
-distinguishes the plumage.
-
-“The palmipede, you see, is admirably protected against wet. Neither
-rain nor the finest drizzle can penetrate the first covering of
-feathers, always kept, as it is, well coated with the varnish laid on
-by the point of the beak. The bird can plunge into the deepest water,
-swim on its surface, or sleep there cradled by the waves, and the wet
-will not reach it. Neither will cold affect it, for under this outer
-covering is found a second, designed for resisting inclement weather
-and made of what is most efficacious for preserving the heat of the
-body. This under-clothing of aquatic birds is a down so delicate and
-soft that, unable to compare it with anything else, we have given it a
-special name, that of eiderdown. In its proper place I will come back
-to this down. For the present let us confine ourselves to a general
-survey of the palmipedes, and of the duck in particular.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XII
-
-THE DUCK
-
-
-“I will begin with the wild duck, parent stock of our domestic duck. It
-is a splendid bird, at least the male, for the costume of the female is
-less rich, as may be remarked in all the other species. The head and
-upper part of the neck are emerald green, with glints as of polished
-metal, while beneath is a white collar, its dull coloring contrasting
-with the brilliance of the adjacent tints. A brownish purple extends
-from the base of the neck down over the breast, where it gradually
-fades into gray on the sides and stomach. Changeable green, mixed with
-black, colors the region of the tail, whence rise four small feathers
-curling in the shape of a crook. In the middle of each wing a spot of
-magnificent azure is encircled, first, with velvety blue, then with
-white. The back, sides, and stomach are speckled with black spots on a
-gray ground. Finally, the beak is yellowish green, and the feet are
-orange. Such is the duck in its wild state, and such it often is under
-domestication, notwithstanding the numerous variations of plumage that
-captivity has caused it to undergo.”
-
-“The head superbly clothed in green,” observed Emile, “the little curly
-tail-feathers, and the spot of blue in the middle of the wing—I have
-noticed all these lots of times in tame ducks.”
-
-“The wild duck is strong of wing and a passionate lover of travel.
-Consequently it is found nearly everywhere; but it does not stay long
-anywhere, unless it be in the most northerly regions, Lapland,
-Spitzbergen, and Siberia, where it delights in the solitude so
-favorable for nesting undisturbed and passing the summer. Twice a year
-it visits us: in the spring on its way to the North, and in the autumn
-on its return from the Pole, when it goes as far as Africa to take up
-its winter quarters in warmer countries. On a gray November day when it
-threatens snow you can see, passing from north to south, at a great
-height, migrating birds arranged one behind another in two files which
-meet in a point, like the two arms of a V. It is a flock of ducks
-emigrating. They are fleeing the approach of cold weather and seeking a
-milder climate, perhaps beyond the sea, where they may find assured
-nourishment in waters that do not freeze. The better to cleave the air
-and husband their strength on such a long journey, the flying squadron
-arranges itself in the form of a wedge, the point of which opens the
-way through the resisting air. The post at the tip is the hardest,
-since the leader of the file, being the first, has to overcome the
-resistance of the atmosphere. Each one takes it in turn for a certain
-time, and when it is tired falls back to the rear to rest while another
-takes its place.”
-
-“To come from countries near the Pole to this one, and still more to
-Africa,” said Jules, “is a very long journey, at least a thousand
-miles. I can understand how, in order to accomplish it, the ducks must
-save their strength by arranging themselves in the form of a wedge,
-point foremost. But tell me, Uncle, what makes these birds prefer the
-countries of the extreme north, where they go to pass the summer and
-build their nests? Wouldn’t they be better off with us than in those
-wild countries, so cold and covered with snow and ice a great part of
-the year?”
-
-“Such is not the opinion of the duck, which prefers the gloomy
-solitudes of the most desolate islands to countries disturbed by the
-presence of man. In those peaceful spots it can raise its family in
-complete security; and, besides, provisions abound in the neighboring
-waters, which are thawed out for several weeks by the summer sun.
-Neither is it the opinion of the teal, goose, plover, lapwing, and many
-others, which all, as soon as spring comes, leave us and return to the
-North, journeying by long stages. Then it is that, from his ambush in a
-hut of foliage in the middle of a swampy field or in the dried bed of a
-wide torrent, the hunter imitates with a reed whistle the plaintive
-note of the plover, to call the migrating bird to his nets. The flock
-arrives, circles about a moment undecided, suspects danger, and flies
-off again into the distant blue, where it is soon lost to sight.
-Whither is it going? It is going where its instinct calls it, to the
-solitudes of the North. At the first thawing of the ice, when the
-ground, still wet from the melting snows, begins to be clothed with
-flowers, in fact in May or June, it will reach perhaps the Faroe
-Islands, perhaps the Orkneys or Iceland, or maybe Lapland. It is never
-without a lively interest that I watch the flight of one of these
-migrating flocks, better guided on its audacious journey than the
-navigator with the aid of the compass. I picture to myself the joys of
-arrival, the common delight when the long flight finally ends on the
-home island, the friendly land where, in a mossy hollow, the
-red-marbled eggs will presently be laid.
-
-“For a great many birds, and among them the duck, the archipelagoes of
-the North are a promised land, an earthly paradise. The most varied
-species meet here from all parts of the world. What a lively scene,
-therefore, what a festival, when nesting time comes! Nowhere else is
-there such a reunion of birds. Let me tell you the strange scene that
-takes place then, according to travelers who have witnessed it.
-
-“We are at Spitzbergen, facing some towering cliffs that overlook the
-sea and extend back in the form of receding shelves, one above another,
-like the rows of seats in a theater. These shelves are all covered with
-myriads of female birds sitting on their eggs, with heads turned
-seaward, as numerous and as crowded as the spectators in a theater at a
-first-night performance. They cackle to each other from neighbor to
-neighbor and seem to be engaged in an animated conversation, as a
-diversion from the tedium of prolonged incubation. All around the
-cliff, on the bosom of the waters, swimmers of all kinds dive and
-dabble, chasing, pecking, and beating one another. Others fill the air
-with their hoarse or shrill cries, going unceasingly from sea to nests
-and from nests to sea, calling to their mates, wheeling around above
-them, caressing their little ones, playing with their brothers, and
-showing in a noisy and innocent way their fears and wants, their joy
-and happiness. To describe the agitation, confusion, noise, cries,
-croakings, and whistlings of these countless birds of all shapes and
-colors and styles, is quite impossible. The hunter, dizzy and stunned,
-knows not where to fire in this living whirlpool; he is incapable of
-distinguishing and still more of following the bird he wishes to aim
-at. Wearied by vain effort, he directs his fire at the very midst of
-the cloud. The shot is sped. Immediately confusion is at its height;
-clouds of birds, perched on the rocks or swimming on the water, take
-flight in their turn and mingle with the others; a deafening discordant
-clamor rises to the skies. Far from dissipating, the cloud grows
-thicker and whirls about still more. Cormorants, at first motionless on
-the rocks betwixt wind and water, become noisily excited; sea-gulls fly
-in circles about the hunter’s head and strike him in the face with
-their wings. All these different species, peacefully assembled on an
-isolated rock in the midst of the glacial ocean waves, seem to reproach
-man for coming to the very end of the world to trouble the joys of the
-brooding mother. The females, still motionless on their eggs in the
-midst of this disorder, content themselves with joining their protests
-to those of the indignant males.”
-
-“I have never heard anything like that before, Uncle,” said Jules.
-“Under the roof-tiles we sometimes find a dozen nests of sparrows
-living as neighbors; but how far these little gatherings are from the
-Spitzbergen throngs! Those rocks on the borders of the sea are populous
-towns, with nests for houses and birds for inhabitants.”
-
-“Are there ducks on those rocks, too?” asked Louis.
-
-“No, my friend,” replied Uncle Paul; “there are only sea-birds. Wild
-ducks and geese flock by themselves and make their nests inland, far
-from the waters of the sea, which do not suit them. They prefer the
-borders of a lake or swamp. Their nests are built on the ground among
-tufts of grass. Sometimes they are so numerous one could not take a
-step without treading on eggs.”
-
-“Oh, what a fine harvest of eggs I should have if I were there!”
-
-“You forget, my child, that Uncle Paul expressly forbids you to touch
-birds’ nests. However, as once is not a habit, and as, moreover, the
-temptation would be irresistible, I would shut my eyes and would leave
-you to your own devices if we were on those famous bird-rocks of
-Spitzbergen, Greenland, or Lapland. Basket, hat, handkerchief, all
-would soon be full; you would simply be perplexed what to take and what
-to leave. All shapes are there together. There are some eggs as round
-as balls, some oval and like those of our own poultry, some equally
-pointed at both ends, and some very much enlarged at one end and small
-at the other, almost like pears. All these sea-birds’ eggs are large,
-because the young, on leaving the shell, must be strong enough to
-follow their parents on the water and begin to earn their own living.
-And then, what variety of color and design! There are white eggs,
-yellowish eggs, and red eggs. Some are dark green, imitating the color
-of the waves that roar at the base of the rock; others seem to borrow
-their pale blue from the azure itself. These are diversified with areas
-of different colors, like the maps in your geography; those are painted
-with large spots and remind one of the leopard’s skin.”
-
-“Oh, if I were only there!” sighed Emile.
-
-“As we are not there, let us leave the beautiful rock-eggs to the birds
-and return to the duck.
-
-“It is in order to get back to these northern countries, their
-paradise, that wild ducks pass over us at the end of winter. The
-journey is chiefly made at night, the day being reserved for rest among
-the rushes. While the flock sleeps, each bird’s head under its wing,
-some members station themselves at favorable points and, vigilant
-scouts, watch over the common welfare. At the first appearance of
-danger the cry of alarm is sounded, a sort of hoarse clarion call.
-Immediately the flock takes wing or dives under the water. In
-descending from the upper air and alighting on a suitable spot, the
-cautious bird is equally prudent. The flock comes and goes several
-times, and circles about repeatedly to give the place a thorough
-examination. If nothing disquieting appears, it descends in an oblique
-flight, grazes the surface of the water with the tips of its wings, and
-then swims to the middle of the pond, far from the shore where the
-danger would be greatest. Nothing, then, is more difficult than to
-catch a flock of wild ducks off their guard. The hunter has recourse to
-a ruse and turns to his own account the friendly relations that always
-exist between the tame duck and its brother, the wild duck. Hidden on
-the edge of the pond in a reed hut, he releases two or three tame
-ducks, whose cries call the strangers and bring them within gunshot.
-
-“Although the laying of eggs generally takes place in the northern
-regions, there are always a few pairs of ducks that linger and make
-their nests with us, either from being tired with too long a journey or
-because they have strayed away from the migrating flocks. For her
-nesting place, the mother chooses some cluster of reeds in the middle
-of the swamp. She beats down and flattens the central rushes; then,
-using her beak to intertwine the outer ones, she succeeds in weaving a
-kind of coarse basket, which she lines with warm down, plucked from her
-breast and stomach. More rarely she establishes herself in some large
-tree where she makes use of a nest abandoned by the magpie. The rude
-structure of dry sticks is restored, and especially is it well lined
-with fine feathers plucked from her own body. The eggs are laid in
-March and number about fifteen. Incubation takes thirty-one days.
-Whenever the need of food makes her leave the nest for a few minutes,
-the mother takes care to cover the eggs with a thick layer of down, so
-that they shall not become cold. When she comes back it is never in a
-straight line or uninterrupted flight. She alights at some distance
-from the nest, then cautiously approaches by tortuous windings, varied
-every time and calculated to baffle whoever may be watching her.
-
-“The young ones are born clothed with a delicate fur of yellow down,
-which they keep for some time. As soon as hatched, the brood is led to
-the water and abandons the nest, never to return to it. If the pond is
-too far away for such young legs, or if the nest is at the top of some
-tall oak, the father and mother take the little ones tenderly by the
-nape of the neck and carry them one by one to the shore. The removal
-accomplished, the mother goes into the water, the boldest one of her
-brood follows her, and the others imitate its example. Their aquatic
-education immediately begins. In order to swim you must do so and so,
-are the parents’ instructions; and to dive and tack about you must do
-like this. The tadpole, that dainty morsel, is caught in this manner,
-but if you don’t catch it with the first snap of the beak, you get it
-by diving. The little shell-fish hides under the leaves, and that’s
-where you must hunt if you want to find it. The larva frequents warm
-mud; seek, my children, near the shore and you will find it. The lively
-frog calls for nimble tactics: a quick snap of the beak will fetch him.
-All that is so soon and so well understood by the ducklings, that the
-mother does not have to look after their food; her part is simply to
-gather them under her wing to keep them warm when the family retires to
-the shore to rest or to pass the night.
-
-“Apart from the love of traveling, which many centuries of
-domestication have caused to be forgotten, the habits of the tame duck
-do not differ from those of the wild. The female duck begins to lay in
-February or March, and lays from forty to fifty eggs a year, if one is
-careful to remove them as they are laid. These eggs are slightly larger
-than the hen’s, smoother, rounder, sometimes dull white, sometimes a
-little greenish. The duck is impelled by instinct to lay them among the
-neighboring reeds and rushes, and it is therefore necessary to watch
-her if one does not wish to run the risk of losing the eggs.
-
-“Domestication does not by any means always improve the qualities of
-animals subjected to our care. If there is gain in corpulence, in
-quantity of alimentary matter, there is frequently loss on the side of
-what might be called the moral qualities. So it is that the tame duck
-is not so good a brooder nor so devoted a mother as the wild one. The
-hen, on the contrary, has forgotten none of her maternal duties; she
-even carries them to excess in the hen-house, until she lets herself
-die of starvation on her nest, a thing she would not do in her wild
-state. Hence, it is to the hen, a better mother than the duck, that the
-latter’s eggs are usually entrusted.
-
-“The period of incubation is thirty-one days, the same as with the wild
-duck. If the brood is hatched at a time of year when the weather is
-still cold, it would be dangerous for the ducklings to go immediately
-into the water, whither their instinct calls them, and whither the
-mother duck that had brooded them would not fail to lead them. Hence
-the little ones and their mother, hen or duck, are put under a coop in
-a place apart, where there is no danger of trampling or other rough
-treatment from the rest of the poultry. During this sequestration the
-food consists of a mixture of barley flour, boiled potatoes, bran, and
-chopped nettles, all made into a mush with greasy dish-water. Ducklings
-have a strong stomach and active digestion; they need from six to eight
-meals a day, so quickly does their food pass. Let us not forget to put
-a large plate of water under the coop. It will serve them as a swimming
-basin in which their wide beaks will practise dabbling and their webbed
-feet will learn their destined use. Daily sport on this little sheet of
-water will help them to have patience until the great day when larger
-evolutions on the broad pond will be allowed.
-
-“A week, two weeks, pass in this way. At last the longed-for moment
-arrives. The mother duck leads her family to the neighboring pond, or
-the ducklings find their way thither unaided if they have a hen for a
-nurse. I have told you of the fright of that adoptive mother when she
-sees her little ones throw themselves joyously into the water, deaf to
-her supplications. If the pond is not too deep, the hen wades in till
-the water reaches half-way up her legs, and runs along the edge,
-calling her dear brood. In vain her courageous devotion, to no purpose
-her anxiety and grief: the ducklings gain the deep water whither she
-cannot follow them, and, heedless of the mother admonishing them from
-the shore, they wag their little pointed tails with joy.
-
-“Like the pig, the duck will eat anything and everything. In still
-waters, in which it delights, it snaps up tadpoles and little frogs,
-worms of all kinds and soft shell-fish, water insects and little
-minnows. In the field it eats the tender herbage and makes prey of the
-slimy slug and even the snail, no whit abashed by the latter’s shell.
-In the poultry-yard offer it the kitchen leavings, parings of all
-kinds, garden refuse, dish-water, and garbage, and the glutton will
-feast royally.
-
-“Thus because of its voracity the duck is easy to fatten; provided it
-has abundant food and a chance to play in the water, you may be sure it
-will take on fat without any other care. Nevertheless, in order to
-obtain certain results it is necessary to go beyond the bird’s natural
-gluttony and have recourse to forcible feeding. For a couple of weeks
-ducks are shut up in a dark place. Morning and evening, a servant takes
-them on her knees, crosses their wings, and opens their beak with one
-hand while with the other she stuffs their crop with boiled maize. Thus
-gorged to excess with food, the miserable ducks pass their captivity
-resting on their stomachs, always panting, almost breathless, half
-stifled. Some die of surfeit. Finally the rump, distended with fat,
-spreads the tail-feathers out fan-wise so that they cannot be closed
-again. This is a sign that the fattening process has reached its
-extreme limit. Haste is then made to behead the poor creature, which
-otherwise would soon die of suffocation.”
-
-“And why, if you please,” asked Jules, “these horrible tortures if the
-duck fattens so easily by itself?”
-
-“Alas, my friend, the satisfaction of the stomach makes us cruelly
-ingenious. In the state of continual suffocation that overtakes the
-bird when it is gorged with boiled maize, a mortal disease sets in, the
-disease of the glutton, among men as among ducks. The liver becomes
-tremendously enlarged and changes to a soft, shapeless mass, oozing
-grease. Well, this liver, decomposed by disease, furnishes to the
-palate of connoisseurs an incomparable delicacy. I take their word for
-it, not being able to speak from experience, as I have none; for,
-between you and me, my friend, I own that such delicacies would be
-repugnant to your Uncle Paul. In my humble opinion, it is paying too
-much for a greasy mouthful to subject the duck to those frightful
-tortures. I will add that the pasties of Amiens and the celebrated
-ragouts of Nérac and Toulouse are made of these livers.
-
-“To bring this subject to a close, a few words on a second kind of
-duck, less common in our poultry-yards than the first. It is the
-Barbary duck, called also the musk duck on account of its odor of musk,
-and likewise known as the silent duck, because it utters no cry. It is
-much larger than the common duck, its plumage is darker, of a
-variegated black and green, and the head of the male is adorned with
-scales and with fleshy growths of a bright red color.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XIII
-
-THE WILD GOOSE
-
-
-“When we say of some one, ‘He is as silly as a goose,’ we think we have
-applied the strongest term indicative of foolishness that our language
-furnishes. Is the goose then so silly? That is what I am about to
-discuss with you, my friends.
-
-“I agree at the outset that its appearance is not such as to give a
-high idea of its intellectual faculties. Its head is too small for its
-body, its diminutive and expressionless eyes, its enormous beak hiding
-its whole face, its waddling walk made still more awkward by the fatty
-protuberance that hangs down under its stomach and strikes its feet,
-its neck sometimes awkwardly outstretched, sometimes sharply bent as if
-broken, its cry surpassing in hoarseness the note of the hoarsest
-clarion, its angry or frightened whistle resembling the hiss of the
-snake when surprised—all that, I hasten to acknowledge, does not
-prepossess one in favor of the bird. But how often, under a rude
-exterior, is hidden a refined nature! Let us not judge the goose by its
-appearance, but let us go deeper before forming a fixed opinion.”
-
-“I see what you are up to, Uncle,” interrupted Jules; “you are taking
-up your favorite refrain, the praise of the slandered. A while ago you
-extolled the two ugliest of creatures, the bat and the toad; now you
-are going to undertake the defense of the goose and clear it of the
-slander it suffers in being called silly.”
-
-“Why should I deny it, my child? Yes, my favorite occupation is
-pleading the cause of the weak, the miserable, the traduced, the
-outlawed. The strong and the powerful are not wanting in admirers, so I
-can pass them over very quickly; but I should reproach myself all my
-life were I to forget the forsaken and not bring to light their good
-qualities, unrecognized and, indeed, too often shamefully
-misrepresented as they are. As to its treatment, the goose needs no
-pleading of mine: it is too valuable to us not to be taken care of as
-it deserves. The only reproach I have to bring has to do with the
-reputation for stupidity it has been made to bear. I am well aware that
-the goose, as a sensible creature, is superbly indifferent to this
-calumny, and I offer it my congratulations; but, after all, this false
-repute is an instance of error, and wherever I find error I give it
-battle.
-
-“First, I will show you the goose as an adept in geography. In spite of
-our books, maps, and atlases, how the reputedly silly bird would
-surpass all of us and many others! Know that in its wild state the
-goose is an impassioned traveler, even more so than its companion, the
-duck. Influenced by considerations of convenience, the latter often
-nests in our latitudes; the goose is more given to mistrust and passes
-us by. For the laying of its eggs it must seek regions as near the Pole
-as possible, regions of never-melting ice. The desolate wastes of
-Greenland and Spitzbergen, and, still farther north, the islands lost
-in the fogs of the polar ocean, are the regions whither they feel bound
-to return every summer. The point of departure, where the bird has
-passed the winter in the midst of plenty when its native country was
-plunged in continual night and buried under fathomless depths of snow
-and ice—the point of departure is far south, in central Africa perhaps,
-so that the distance to be covered measures almost a
-quarter-circumference of the earth. Now, my friends, let us put
-ourselves in the place of the wild goose just about to take its flight
-for the long expedition, and see which of the two parties will be the
-more perplexed, the more stupid. I leave out of the account means of
-transportation: however good a mount we might have, we should cut a
-pitiable figure beside the goose, which with powerful wing soars above
-the clouds and conquers space. I pass by the means of transportation
-and ask only what direction is to be taken. I appeal to your knowledge
-of geography.”
-
-“Since it is only necessary to go north,” answered Jules, “I should
-first make sure of the points of the compass. I should turn toward the
-sun, and if it is rising, the north would be on the left; if setting,
-the north would be on the right. This direction fixed, I should set out
-accordingly.”
-
-“In the supposed case that method is inapplicable. As an experienced
-traveler husbanding its strength and hence making the most of the
-cooler hours, the goose travels only at night.”
-
-“Then I would turn toward the constellation of the Bear, toward the
-polar star. The north is in that direction.”
-
-“Very good: you would find the north in that way if the night were
-clear; but if the night were dark and you could not see the stars, what
-would you do?”
-
-“I should use a compass, the needle of which always points nearly
-northward.”
-
-“But if you did not have that precious instrument, the traveler’s guide
-in the midst of the waste solitudes of land and sea—if you had no
-compass, how would you find your way, my friend?”
-
-“In that case, Uncle, I should be very much perplexed. Perplexed is not
-the word; on the contrary, I should see very clearly that there was no
-possibility of my finding my way. I should not budge from the spot, for
-I might as well try to guide myself blindfolded.”
-
-“Here, my dear child, the bird reputed to be so stupid, so foolish,
-towers above us all by a thousand cubits. Without consulting the rising
-or setting sun, paying no heed to the constellations, for which it has
-no use, availing itself of no compass but its instinct, which says,
-‘This is the way’—in darkness as well as in light, the goose plunges
-into space and flies northward.
-
-“But that is only the beginning of the problem. A simple northern
-direction leads, according to the point of departure, to very different
-regions, sometimes to Siberia, sometimes to Spitzbergen and Lapland,
-sometimes to the northern islands of Iceland, Greenland, and what
-others shall I say? But no such vague destination will do for the
-goose. The bird must return to its native country, of which it retains
-an ineffaceable remembrance, just as a man, through all the shifts and
-changes of his stirring life, preserves the cherished memory of his own
-village. The goose, then, must again find the sea whose murmur it
-listened to in youth. In that sea is a certain islet, on that islet a
-certain moor, and on that moor a certain hidden retreat covered with
-rushes and sheltered from the wind by a rock. That is its birthplace;
-it must find its way.
-
-“Propose such an undertaking to a navigator provided with first-rate
-charts and versed in all the special lore of his calling, and he would
-finally succeed, it is true, but would encounter difficulties due to
-the inhospitable seas of those parts. Propose it to one of us, who have
-none of the requisite nautical knowledge, and it would put our
-geography to the test without any chance of ultimate success. But this
-task which man, with all his reasoning powers, would in the great
-majority of instances be incapable of performing, the goose
-accomplishes without the slightest hesitation. As though the desired
-spot were right before its eyes, it goes straight forward. The
-featureless expanse of ocean and the confusing details of the
-landscape, the halts on the margins of lakes, the damp and obscurity of
-clouds that have to be traversed, the emotions of terror excited when
-the ambushed hunter discharges his leaden hail—none of these things
-diverts it from its course. If detours must be made in order to avoid
-danger or find food, it makes them, however long they may be, and then
-resumes the right direction without a moment’s hesitation. It
-calculates its speed and regulates its halts so as to arrive neither
-too early nor too late; for it knows perfectly the order of the
-seasons, when the snow melts and when the grass turns green. At last,
-on a fine day when the first little flowers are just peeping through
-their snowy shrouds, it reaches its ocean inlet, its little island, its
-native heath, its cherished nesting-place.
-
-“I have finished. Now, my friends, which one of you would like to
-engage in a geography match—not with a veteran goose experienced in
-such voyages; you would be too hopelessly outclassed—but with the
-youngest gosling, the merest novice of them all?”
-
-“On that subject,” Jules made answer, “I admit that the youngest
-gosling knows more than I.”
-
-“And than I,” chimed in Louis, and Emile added: “If the goose knew that
-I can’t even find my bearings yet on the map, how it would make fun of
-poor Emile! You will tell us so much about its cleverness, Uncle, that
-after this I shan’t be able to meet a goose without blushing.”
-
-“It is very praiseworthy to blush at one’s ignorance,” his uncle
-assured him, “especially on a subject as necessary as geography; for it
-is a sign that in future one will do one’s best; but none may expect to
-rival the goose. We acquire our knowledge by reflection, study,
-observation, experience; an animal does not acquire knowledge, it
-possesses knowledge from its birth. Without ever having learned it,
-without ever having seen it done, it does everything belonging to its
-manner of living, and does it admirably well. A feeling not reasoned, a
-secret impulse proper to its nature, guides it in its acts; it is
-instinct, the marvels of which I have often related to you. If, to
-accomplish its astonishing journeys, the goose had to learn geography
-as we do, it would never see its beloved native land again; but it has
-as guide the infallible inspiration of instinct, and with this inner
-compass it wings its unerring way straight toward its natal islet,
-however hidden by polar fogs that islet may be.
-
-“Its manner of traveling is not less remarkable. I have already told
-you something about the duck; I come back to the subject in order to
-emphasize the high degree of mechanical science possessed by the goose.
-A bird on the wing is held up by the air which its wings strike; it is
-also impeded in its progress by the air, the resistance of which it
-must conquer. To overcome this obstacle with the least possible fatigue
-what does the bird do, especially the crane, heron, stork, and other
-wading birds encumbered with long legs and a long neck? They bring the
-neck back on the breast, point their sharp beak forward, and, holding
-their outstretched legs close together, trail them behind. With form
-thus trimmed to extreme slimness, and with beak acting as the point of
-a spear-head, they cleave the air as a ship plows the wave with its
-sharp prow. No bird is wanting in this elementary principle of
-mechanics: to gather the members together and taper the body in the
-direction of motion, so as to encounter the least resistance. By
-undertaking these very long flights in large flocks the duck and the
-goose improve upon this general method.
-
-“Before going further let us draw a comparison. I will suppose that you
-are a company of playmates running across lots, and you come to a tract
-all covered with thick brushwood that has to be parted with feet and
-hands before you can get through. If each one goes about it in his own
-way, one here and another there just as it happens, is it not true that
-the sum total of fatigue for the whole company will be the greatest
-possible, since each one will have spent his strength in opening a way
-for himself through the thicket? But now let us suppose, on the other
-hand, that one of you, the most vigorous of the company, walks at the
-head, parting the underbrush, and that the others follow him, step by
-step, taking advantage of the path opened by the leader of the file. Is
-it not true that under these conditions the sum total of fatigue will
-be the least possible?”
-
-“All that is obvious,” Emile replied. “They could even, if it were a
-long way through the brushwood, take turns in going ahead, and then no
-one would be really tired out.”
-
-“This device of Emile’s has, as you already know, been put in practice
-from time immemorial by ducks on their long flights. Nor is the goose
-less happily inspired. If the flock is a small one, the birds composing
-it range themselves in a continuous single file, each following bird
-touching with its beak the tail of the preceding one, in order that the
-way opened through the air may not have time to close again. If the
-flock is numerous, two files of equal length are formed, and they join
-each other at an acute angle, advancing point first. This angular
-arrangement, which we find imitated in the ship’s prow, in the farmer’s
-plowshare, in the thin edge of a wedge, and in any number of utensils
-fashioned for penetrating a dense mass by overcoming resistance, is the
-one best suited for cleaving the air with the least possible fatigue.
-If, to arrange its flying squadron, the goose had taken counsel of the
-most consummate science of our engineers, it could not have done
-better. But the goose has no need of others; advised by its instinct,
-it knew long before us, who call it stupid, one of the great secrets of
-mechanics, the principle of the wedge.
-
-“Moreover, to divide among all the members of the flock the excess of
-fatigue felt by the leader of the file in being the first to cleave
-with a stroke of his wing the resisting atmosphere, each one in its
-turn occupies the post of honor, the forward end of the single file, or
-the apex of the two joining files. It is a repetition of Emile’s
-expedient for penetrating a considerable extent of brushwood. After its
-turn of service at the front the leading goose retires for rest to the
-rear of one or other of the branches of the angle, while a new leader
-takes its place. By this means of equitable rotation excessive fatigue
-on the part of any one of the migrating flock is avoided, and no
-stragglers are left behind.”
-
-“And no goose has to be urged to take what you call the post of honor,
-the arduous post at the front?” queried Emile.
-
-“None has to be urged. It is their duty, and they all fulfil it with a
-zeal that in many instances man might take as a model. To the recusant
-slacker the smallest gosling would give a lesson in what is owing to
-the common welfare. As soon as the leader feels its strength weakening,
-the next one in order takes its place without having to be told.”
-
-“Decidedly,” interposed Jules, “those geese, with their cleverness in
-geography and their skill in the art of flying in flocks and in
-devising means for mutual assistance, are not so silly as they are said
-to be.”
-
-“The flight of a flock of geese is generally very high; they do not
-come near the ground except in foggy weather. If on such an occasion
-some farm chances to be near, it occasionally happens that resounding
-clarion calls answer each other from sky to earth and earth to sky.
-That is the interchange of greetings between wild and tame geese. The
-wild ones invite the captives to come and join them in their pilgrimage
-to the promised land of the North. The proposal puts the poultry-yard
-all in a turmoil, so compelling is the call of instinct. The farm geese
-become excited, scream, beat their sides with their large wings; but
-the plumpness of captivity prevents their flight. One less impeded
-takes wing, rises in the air, and is gone.”
-
-“To Spitzbergen?” asked Emile.
-
-“Yes, to Spitzbergen, if strength does not fail it, but it is very
-doubtful whether it will be able to follow its wild companions to the
-end.
-
-“The goose feeds chiefly on herbage. With its wide beak furnished at
-the edges with little scales resembling sharp teeth, it browses the
-turf very much as does the sheep. A field of green wheat particularly
-delights it. If a rather large flock alights there the harvest is
-seriously injured. During the devastation sentries keep a look-out,
-some here, others there, motionless, neck outstretched, eye and ear on
-the alert. Let danger approach, and immediately the trumpet sounds. At
-the warning the flock ceases grazing, runs with wings open to get a
-start, then takes flight and mounts obliquely to heights above the
-reach of a shot. The same precautions are taken in the hours of repose;
-furthermore, actuated by an excess of prudence, they refuse to trust
-entirely to the sentinels, but each sleeps with one eye open, as we
-say. Thus are the ruses of the hunter nearly always baffled when he
-tries to get near them.
-
-“I will stop here for to-day. I hope that, without going into other
-details that would carry us too far, I have reinstated the slandered
-bird in your esteem. The goose is not silly; on the contrary, it
-possesses to a high degree the wiles, the talents, in fact everything
-necessary for the admirable fulfilment of its mission as a goose.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XIV
-
-THE DOMESTIC GOOSE
-
-
-“Before America had given us the turkey, the goose was sought for its
-flesh, which does not lack merit, although inferior to that of the bird
-from the New World. Roast goose was the dish of honor at family feasts.
-Now that the turkey has supplanted it in the solemnities of the table,
-it is raised chiefly for its fat, which is very fine and savory,
-rivaling butter in its uses. As to its flesh, relegated to secondary
-rank and regarded as a mere accessory, it is salted and preserved like
-pork. The region of which Toulouse is the center is the most renowned
-for this branch of agricultural industry. Large flocks are raised there
-of a species of goose called the Toulouse goose, remarkable for its
-large size and its tendency to corpulence. Its pouch of fat hanging
-down under its stomach reaches even to the ground, and grows so heavy
-as to interfere with the bird’s walk. The plumage is dark gray, with
-brown or black spots; the beak is orange, and the legs flesh color.
-
-“When it is desired to fatten the goose to the utmost limit, the
-process calls for the fundamental conditions expounded in the chapter
-on the poulard; that is to say, as much food as the stomach can bear,
-immobility, complete repose, and almost continual sleep. These
-principles recalled to mind, let us consider the Toulouse method. The
-geese are shut up in a dark place, cool without being damp, where they
-cannot hear the noises of the poultry-yard. The trumpet-calls of their
-free companions would awaken in them vexatious regrets and would
-interfere with their digestion. Three times a day the woman employed to
-fatten them seats herself on a low chair and takes them one by one
-between her knees so as to control their movements. She opens the beak
-by force and thrusts far down the throat the tube of a tin funnel.”
-
-“That funnel is for feeding them?” asked Emile.
-
-“Precisely.”
-
-“Then they are compelled to swallow even if they don’t want to.”
-
-“What does the fattener care? All that concerns her is not to wound the
-bird during the operation. Furthermore, to make the utensil slip into
-its place better she takes care to oil the end of it a little. The poor
-creature struggles and protests as best it can against the violence to
-which it is subjected. But all in vain: the woman keeps at it. Now she
-pours a handful of maize into the funnel, and as the grains would not
-descend of themselves, the bird contracting that part of its throat not
-reached by the tube, she pushes them down with little blows on the crop
-with a wooden rammer; she crams (that is the word) the patient’s
-stomach with maize. From time to time a little cold water is given to
-aid this painful deglutition. When the crop is full, which is
-ascertained by the touch of the hand, the bird is set free; another
-takes its place and, willy nilly, receives the funnel in its throat.
-During the thirty-five days that this feeding lasts, a goose consumes
-forty liters of corn; that is to say, more than a liter a day.”
-
-“After such a cramming with quantities of corn rammed down by main
-force,” remarked Jules, “the goose must get discouraged and pine away.”
-
-“Get discouraged! You don’t realize a goose’s appetite. The miserable
-creature becomes accustomed to this diet, even takes a liking to it,
-and toward the end of the operation comes of its own accord and opens
-its beak to receive the funnel which ere long proves fatal to it. Soon
-we see the pouch of fat under the stomach dragging on the ground, the
-orange color of the beak turning pale, the breathing rendered
-difficult, and every sign pointing to a near end—suffocation by excess
-of corpulence. But the knife forestalls this. The bird is cut into
-quarters and salted; its melted grease is put into pots or bottles,
-where it can be kept for two years with its beautiful white color and
-fine flavor unimpaired.
-
-“In other countries the fattening process includes the application, in
-its utmost rigor, of the principle of immobility. Under an earthen pot,
-the bottom of which has been broken, the goose is put in such a way
-that only its head is left free, projecting through the opening. Thus
-immured in its earthenware coffin, which barely permits it to turn
-round, the goose has only one distraction, eating. With food served in
-abundance, it eats just for the pleasure of it, and consumes so much
-that at the end of two weeks it becomes a ball of fat. To get it out of
-its cell the pot must be broken.
-
-“Elsewhere, especially in Alsace, the goose is shut up in a little pine
-box so narrow that the bird cannot turn round in it. The floor of the
-cell is made of slats far enough apart for the dung to fall through;
-the front wall is pierced with an opening for the passage of the head,
-and beneath this opening is a trough always full of water, in which are
-placed a few pieces of charcoal as a disinfectant. Charcoal, in fact,
-possesses the property of absorbing infectious gases, and thus prevents
-the corruption that might develop in the bird’s drink. The captive in
-its narrow cage is kept in the cellar or at least in a dark place.
-Morning and night it is forcibly stuffed with corn softened by several
-hours’ soaking in water; the rest of the time it thrusts its head
-through its dormer-window and drinks, dabbling as much as it pleases in
-the trough just below. With twenty-five liters of corn—for the northern
-species is smaller than that of Toulouse—the goose, at the end of a
-month, is fattened sufficiently.
-
-“The presence of a ball of grease under each wing, together with
-difficulty in breathing, announces that the time has arrived for
-cutting the prisoner’s throat; if deferred, it would die from
-suffocation.
-
-“The lack of exercise that attends the fattening process in captivity,
-whether in a pot with broken bottom or in a pine box, makes its effects
-felt principally in the structure of the liver, which grows to an
-enormous size and becomes charged with fat, as I have already told you
-in speaking of the duck. With the method used in Alsace the liver
-attains the weight of half a kilogram and sometimes double that.
-Moreover, in the process of cooking, a goose yields from three to five
-pounds of fat admirably suited for use with vegetables through the rest
-of the year. Goose livers serve the same purposes as ducks’ livers:
-they go to the making of the ragouts of Nérac and Toulouse, and they
-form the chief ingredient in the celebrated Strasburg pâtés de foie
-gras.
-
-“We have not yet exhausted the uses of the goose. Before the invention
-of steel pens, in general use to-day, large goose quills were employed
-for writing. Their preparation consisted in passing them through hot
-ashes and then scraping them a little to remove their greasy coating,
-which would prevent the ink’s flowing. Of very convenient size for the
-fingers, their combined firmness and elastic flexibility made them also
-admirably adapted for writing; but they had to be recut from time to
-time, and the handling of a penknife was not without its difficulties,
-its dangers even, in inexperienced hands like yours. So steel pens have
-almost entirely supplanted them.
-
-“Another product of the goose’s plumage consists in the small feathers
-and down used for bedding. I have told you how aquatic birds,
-especially those of cold countries, have under their outside coat of
-feathers, which is impregnated with oil to resist wet and storm, an
-inner coat composed of the finest down and very fit for protecting the
-bird from the cold. This down we called eiderdown. I revert to it now
-on account of its importance.
-
-“The best eiderdown is furnished by a kind of duck called the
-eider-duck, intermediate in size between the goose and the tame duck.
-This duck lives in a wild state in the frozen regions of the North. It
-is whitish in color with a black head as well as black stomach and
-tail. The female, which is rather smaller than the male, is gray except
-for some brown spots under the body. Its food is composed of fish,
-which its untiring wing enables it to catch at long distances from the
-coast and well out to sea. On the water all day searching for fish, the
-eider-duck returns at night to some icy islet, a warm enough resting
-place for its purpose, well muffled as it is in eiderdown.
-
-“In some hollow of the sharp rocks of the shore it builds its nest,
-composed on the outside of mosses and dry seaweed, and on the inside of
-a thick eiderdown lining which the mother plucks from her stomach and
-breast. On this soft little bed rest five or six dull green eggs.”
-
-“We have already seen the wild duck plucking its stomach to cover its
-eggs with down,” put in Jules.
-
-“The eider-duck does the same, but with a greater expenditure of down.
-When the mother leaves her nest for a moment, she shelters her eggs
-under an abundant covering of her finest down. After the departure of
-the brood, those who hunt for eiderdown, especially the Icelanders,
-visit the abandoned nests and collect the down, but not without danger,
-since the nests are generally situated in inaccessible places on the
-ledges of high cliffs. They can reach them only by being lowered with
-ropes along the face of the precipitous rocks.
-
-“The quilts that we call eiderdown are large coverlets filled with
-these very fine feathers. Their flocky mass, very light in spite of its
-size, is the best covering for retaining heat. Those most in demand are
-made of the down of the eider-duck, and are so elastic and light that
-one can press and hold in two hands the quantity of down necessary for
-a large bed-coverlet. But as this down is rare and very high-priced,
-the coarser kind, from the poultry-yard duck and goose, is commonly
-used.
-
-“Every year the sheep yields its fleece to the shearer, and in the same
-way, four times a year, the goose is robbed of a part of its fine
-feathers and down. The operation is especially easy at molting time,
-for then the feathers come out with the least effort. The goose is
-plucked, but not entirely, you understand, beneath the stomach, on the
-neck, and on the under side of the wings; it is only when dead that it
-is plucked completely. This harvest of feathers is put into a bag
-without being pressed, and must next be subjected for some time to the
-heat of an oven from which bread has just been taken out. This removes
-its disagreeable odor and the parasites that often infest it. If,
-however, other parasites appear later, notably moths, greedy, as you
-know, for anything of animal origin, such as cloth, hair, down, or
-wool, the feathers must be fumigated with burning sulphur.
-
-“The eggs of the goose are white and remarkably large, as one would
-expect from the size of the bird. When one sees, generally in February,
-a goose dragging with its beak some bits of straw and carrying them to
-its nesting place, it is a sign that laying time is approaching. The
-goose is then kept at home instead of being sent out into the fields. A
-laying numbers fifteen eggs at the most; but if care is taken to visit
-the nest and remove the eggs as fast as they are laid, the number
-increases and may go, it is said, as high as forty. The goose has the
-same fault as the duck: she is not a very assiduous brooder. Hence it
-is thought best to have the turkey do the setting. As for the hen, she
-is, despite her motherly qualities, out of the question, however small
-the setting may be: goose eggs are so large that she could not cover
-more than half a dozen at the most.
-
-“Incubation lasts a month. As the eggs do not all hatch at the same
-time and as the brooder, goose or turkey, might be tempted to abandon
-the backward eggs in order to take care of the first-born goslings, it
-is advisable to take the little ones from the nest as fast as they
-hatch and to put them in a wool-lined basket. When the hatching is all
-finished, the family is given back to the mother. Warmth and a special
-diet are necessary the first few days. The goslings are fed with a
-mixture of bread-crumbs, corn-meal, milk, lettuce, and chopped nettles.
-At the end of eight or ten days this careful treatment may cease, and
-if the weather is fine the mother goose can be allowed to lead the
-brood whither she pleases, even to the neighboring pond, providing the
-water is warm. The male, the gander, as it is called, generally
-accompanies the family, protects it, and proves his courage in time of
-danger. Woe betide the thoughtless person who, even with no evil
-intention, approaches the goslings. The gander runs at him, neck
-outstretched, with loud and hissing cry, and gives him battle with wing
-and beak. When I was young I knew a little scamp who threw a stone at
-the goslings and was straightway knocked down by a blow of the gander’s
-wing and then well thrashed. Timely aid was rendered, else the
-imprudent assailant would have been disfigured by the bird.”
-
-“You caught it that time, stone-thrower!” cried Emile. “For my part, I
-never pick a quarrel with geese; but one day they chased me and caught
-me by the blouse. Oh, how frightened I was!”
-
-“If you are not strong enough to defend yourselves, children, do not go
-near the goose when she has her little ones with her. She is very
-distrustful then and might do you harm.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XV
-
-THE PIGEON
-
-
-“The strong resemblance that the tame pigeon often bears to the wild
-one known as the rock-pigeon makes us suspect this latter to be the
-ancestor of the bird that inhabits our dove-cotes. The rock-pigeon has
-ashy-blue plumage with black-spotted wings and pure-white tail. The
-neck and breast are changeable in color according to the light in which
-they are seen, and shine with a metallic luster, in which sometimes
-purple and sometimes golden green dominates.”
-
-“That is exactly the ordinary plumage of our pigeons,” said Emile.
-“When they come and peck the bread that I crumble for them in the sun,
-I like to see their magnificent breasts shining first with one color
-and then with another, every time the bird moves.”
-
-“Fond of traveling and endowed with a power of flight in accord with
-this predilection, the rock-pigeon is scattered over the greater part
-of the world. Nevertheless it is rare in France, where a few wretched
-pairs, always in dread of the talons of the bird of prey or the
-hunter’s shot, make their nests in the most sparsely settled cantons,
-on the shelves of high rocks. The rocky and mountainous regions of the
-Mediterranean islands are their chosen haunts in Europe.”
-
-“But it is no uncommon thing,” Louis remarked, “to hear of wild pigeons
-being shot in this country.”
-
-“You confound the rock-pigeon, my friend, with another kind of wild
-pigeon, the wood-pigeon. This, as its name indicates, perches on the
-branches of tall trees, which the rock-pigeon never does.”
-
-“Yes, that’s so,” Jules interjected. “I have never seen pigeons that
-are descended from the rock-pigeon alighting on trees. They alight on
-rocks, on roofs, or on the ground.”
-
-“In its free state the rock-pigeon builds its nest in the hollows of
-rocks; the wood-pigeon, on the contrary, builds in trees, in the depths
-of dense forests, where it finds in abundance the acorn and beech-nut,
-its principal food. These habits are not the only difference between
-the two birds. The wood-pigeon is much larger; its breast has the color
-of lees of wine; its neck, gleaming with variegated metallic glints
-like that of its brother, is further adorned on each side with a white
-spot in the shape of a cross. Its flight is sustained and rapid, its
-cooing sonorous, its sight piercing. It feeds on all sorts of seeds,
-especially acorns, which it swallows whole.
-
-“Wood-pigeons like to perch on dead branches at the tops of trees.
-During the cold winter mornings they stay there motionless, waiting for
-a little warmth to come with the rising sun and arouse them from their
-torpor. In summer they frequent full-grown forest-trees, and their
-cooing may be heard in the very midst of the dense foliage. Their
-nesting place is by preference at the junction of several forking
-branches. The male goes forth and gathers from neighboring trees, never
-from the ground, the building material of dry twigs. If he sees a dead
-twig attached to the branch on which he is perching, he seizes it with
-his claws, sometimes with the beak, and tries to break it either by
-leaning on it with all his weight or by pulling it toward him.
-Possessed of his prize, he returns at once to his mate, who contents
-herself with putting the materials into place without taking part in
-getting them. In building the nest, therefore, the male is the worker
-and the female the architect; but an architect without talent, we must
-admit, for the structure is nothing but a mass of intertwined sticks
-without lining of feathers and flock, and, worse still, without
-firmness. Hence it is not unusual for this nest to fall to pieces
-before the brood has taken its flight; fortunately the strong branches
-on which it rests save the young ones from a disastrous fall.
-
-“Wild and mistrustful, the wood-pigeon has never been willing to accept
-the calculated hospitality of the pigeon-house; it prefers the perilous
-life of the woods to the full-fed existence of servitude. This is the
-wild pigeon that frequently falls before the hunter’s fire. In certain
-defiles of the Pyrenees it is caught with large nets, hundreds at a
-time. The rock-pigeon, on the contrary, has from time immemorial been
-dependent on man; and in return for the shelter of the pigeon-house
-which protects it from birds of prey it has been willing to forget so
-completely the rocks where it first nested that to-day one seldom
-finds, at least in our country, any wild pairs.
-
-“Not all our pigeons, however, show the same degree of tameness; far
-from it. Some, voluntary captives rather than real prisoners, are
-faithful to the pigeon-house only as long as they find suitable food in
-the neighboring fields, whither they go in flocks. If the house is not
-to their liking, or if food is lacking, they seek another abode, the
-more adventurous sometimes even returning to the wild life. The others,
-thoroughly enslaved, have completely lost their desire for
-independence. Seldom do they leave their roof, and some are such
-stay-at-homes that the most pressing hunger could not make them go out
-and try to find a little food for themselves in the neighboring
-furrows. Food must always be given them, for they are incapable of
-procuring it themselves.
-
-“Those first mentioned, the pigeons that venture afield and find food
-for themselves, are called rock-pigeons, after the wild pigeon whose
-ways, and frequently whose plumage, they have retained in part. They
-are also known as flighty pigeons (fuyards), either on account of their
-occasional distant expeditions, or because they sometimes take flight
-from the pigeon-house and never return. They are the least costly to
-raise, but they are small and not very productive, as they lay only two
-or three times a year. The second kind, those that scarcely ever leave
-the pigeon-cote and cannot do without our care, are called
-cote-pigeons. Their maintenance costs more because they must be fed all
-the year round; but in compensation they do not ravage the neighboring
-harvests, which cannot be said of the rock-pigeons; and beside they are
-much more productive, their periods of laying numbering as many as ten
-a year. Modified from the earliest times by man’s intervention, the
-cote-pigeon includes a number of varieties in which the traits of the
-primitive species are often no longer recognizable. Let us mention some
-of these.
-
-“First of all are the pigeons with feathered legs and feet, looking as
-if they wore gaiters. This growth of feathers reaches to the very tips
-of the claws, forming a cumbersome and unsightly sort of footgear which
-is found to be due to captivity, the wild bird never having anything of
-the kind. Then come the pouter pigeons, which have the faculty of
-swallowing air and inflating the crop in a large ball, so that the base
-of the neck seems to be affected with the deformity known as goiter.
-That is their way of showing off: the larger the ball, the prouder they
-are of their figure.”
-
-“What a queer idea,” Emile exclaimed, “to think it improves one’s looks
-to have a frightful goiter or to wear those feathered leggings that
-trail in the mud and interfere with walking!”
-
-“A life of idleness, my friend, engenders many caprices: examples
-abound in man even more than in pigeons. But let us get on; these
-things do not concern us.
-
-“Now, here are some pigeons that have their heads adorned with a crown
-of feathers, are shod like the preceding, and imitate in their cooing
-the roll of a drum.”
-
-“Then they ought to be called, from the roll of the drum,
-drummer-pigeons,” declared Emile.
-
-“You have hit it exactly: that is precisely their name. Here are others
-with trailing wings, tail erect and expanded like a fan, and the body
-in an almost continual state of trembling. You would say they had a
-fever. The spread tail gives them the name of fan-tails, while from
-their ceaseless shaking they are sometimes called shakers. Ruffled
-pigeons have the neck encircled with a ruff of disordered feathers.
-Jacobins wear a sort of hood resembling a monk’s cowl. The turbit
-carries on the nape of its neck a tuft of feathers thrown back and
-hollowed out like a shell. Tumblers are remarkable for their strange
-evolutions in the air: in mid-flight they will suddenly let themselves
-fall and turn a somersault as if shot in the wing. This recreation is
-their favorite pastime.”
-
-“The pleasure of a vertical fall,” remarked Jules, “accompanied by a
-somersault, must carry some fear with it. Perhaps that is what gives
-zest to this exercise.”
-
-“But the pigeon pulls up in time?” queried Emile.
-
-“Whenever it wishes to,” his uncle replied, “it brings to an end its
-downward hurtling from these airy heights, ordinary flying is resumed,
-and presently the tumbles begin again finer than ever. Here let us
-pause, without exhausting the list of varieties, amounting to
-twenty-four, counting only the principal ones. These few examples show
-you sufficiently what diversity pigeon-house life has stamped on the
-form, habits, and plumage of the primitive bird.
-
-“All pigeons, wild as well as tame, lay never more than two eggs to a
-hatching, from which generally spring brother and sister. The cares of
-brooding are shared by the father and mother alike, a practice found in
-no other tame bird. In the morning, when hunger makes itself felt, the
-female calls the male by a peculiar cooing and invites him to come and
-take her place on the eggs, which he does with alacrity. About three or
-four o’clock in the afternoon the rôles change. If the pigeon which
-until then has remained on the nest does not see its mate coming, there
-follows an anxious search, with admonitory cooings and, in case of
-need, admonitory peckings; and the laggard is brought back to the
-serious business of brooding. But as a rule the mother is
-irreproachably punctual; she returns to the nest at the hour agreed
-upon and does not leave it again until the next morning. Incubation
-takes seventeen or eighteen days.
-
-“The little ones are born naked, blind, ungraceful. The father and
-mother, sometimes one, sometimes the other, feed them from the beak.
-This beak-feeding method of the pigeons is exceptional and deserves
-special consideration. I need not tell you how other birds feed their
-brood; any one that has ever raised a sparrow will know that.”
-
-“The little sparrow,” Jules hastened to explain, “opens its beak as
-wide as it can and the parents put into it the food they have brought,
-just as I put a grasshopper into it, or a piece of a cherry, or a
-soaked bread-crumb.”
-
-“Jules forgets,” said Emile, “that it is well to tap the little bird on
-the tail to excite its appetite and make it open its beak.”
-
-“Emile’s improvement is not indispensable,” Uncle Paul replied. “If it
-is hungry the bird will open its beak without being asked. Into this
-beak that gapes so wide the parents put the point of theirs and drop
-whatever prize they have found; but if the little bird is very young
-the father and mother begin by half-digesting in their own stomach the
-food destined for the little one. Then they put their beak into the
-little one’s and disgorge the nutritious pap that they have prepared.
-
-“Well, pigeons do exactly the reverse: it is the father and mother that
-gape, and the little ones that plunge their beak deep down into the
-throat of the parent bird. The latter is then seized with a convulsion
-of the stomach accompanied by a rapid trembling of the wings and body.
-Little plaintive cries denote that the operation is perhaps not quite
-painless. From the crop thus done violence to, the half-digested
-nutritive matter comes up in a jet that passes into the half-open beak
-of the nursling. Twice a day the little pigeons receive their food in
-this way; twice a day, but no more, so painful to the nurses seems this
-mode of feeding from beak to beak.”
-
-“I should think,” said Jules, “that the parents would feel rather
-uncomfortable when the young pigeon tickles their throat, deep down,
-with its beak. If we can judge by what would happen to us, the stomach
-would rebel and would throw up its contents painfully.”
-
-“That is apparently the way of it. The disgorged food is a pap of seeds
-all ground up fine in the crop; but for the first three or four days
-after hatching a special food is given, fine and strengthening, suited
-to the weakness of the little one. It is a white substance, almost
-liquid, having the appearance of real milk. It does not come entirely
-from digested food; for the most part it consists of a sort of milkfood
-that is distilled by the stomach on this occasion only. So for the
-first days of the brood’s rearing the pigeons have, deep down in the
-throat, a sort of milk factory, or what one might call the equivalent
-of an udder.”
-
-“That reminds me,” Jules interposed, “of a joke common enough among us
-fellows. When we want to gull some poor innocent, we tell him that
-pigeons suck. This jest comes nearer the truth than is commonly
-thought. Pigeons do not suck the breast, it is true, but it might well
-enough be said that they are suckled, since what they are fed on has so
-much resemblance to milk.”
-
-“Little pigeons stay in the nest a long time,” resumed Uncle Paul.
-“Entirely covered with feathers and almost as large as their parents,
-they still continue to receive parental care. To induce them to shift
-for themselves and give up their place when the time for a new laying
-approaches, some cuffs have to be given to these spoiled children that
-are so reluctant to leave home. But at last they consent, though not
-without returning from time to time to torment the mother with their
-lamentations and to beg her for something to eat. The father, less weak
-on the side of his affections, thenceforth receives these importunate
-lazy-bodies with a peck of the beak.
-
-“Let us consider certain other details of the pigeon’s habits. I will
-not tell you, these things being pretty well known to you, of the
-cooings of the pigeon when it puffs out its throat, of its ceremonious
-salutations, its bowing to the very ground, its pirouettes when it
-shows off before its mate. I shall interest you more by acquainting you
-with its gregarious instinct, which impels it to assemble in immense
-flocks when it travels, in its wild state, to find food.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XVI
-
-A STORY FROM AUDUBON [4]
-
-
-“Here is what we are told on this subject by the celebrated
-ornithologist, Audubon, whom I have already quoted in describing to you
-the habits of the turkey as it is found in its free state in the great
-forests of its native land.
-
-“‘The passenger pigeon, or, as it is usually named in America, the wild
-pigeon, moves with extreme rapidity, propelling itself by quickly
-repeated flaps of the wing, which it brings more or less near the body,
-according to the degree of velocity which is required....
-
-“‘This great power of flight is seconded by as great a power of vision,
-which enables them, as they travel at that swift rate, to inspect the
-country below, discover their food with facility, and thus obtain the
-object for which their journey has been undertaken. This I have also
-proved to be the case, by having observed them, when passing over a
-sterile part of the country, or one scantily furnished with food suited
-to them, keep high in the air, flying with an extended front, so as to
-enable them to survey hundreds of acres at once. On the contrary, when
-the land is richly covered with food, or the trees abundantly hung with
-mast, they fly low, in order to discover the part most plentifully
-supplied....
-
-“‘The multitudes of wild pigeons in our woods are astonishing. Indeed,
-after having viewed them so often, and under so many circumstances, I
-even now feel inclined to pause, and assure myself that what I am going
-to relate is fact. Yet I have seen it all, and that too in the company
-of persons who, like myself, were struck with amazement.
-
-“‘In the autumn of 1813, I left my house at Henderson, on the banks of
-the Ohio, on my way to Louisville. In passing over the Barrens a few
-miles beyond Hardensburgh, I observed the pigeons flying from northeast
-to southwest, in greater number than I thought I had ever seen them
-before, and feeling an inclination to count the flocks that might pass
-within the reach of my eye in one hour, I dismounted, seated myself on
-an eminence, and began to mark with my pencil, making a dot for every
-flock that passed. In a short time finding the task which I had
-undertaken impracticable, as the birds poured in in countless
-multitudes, I rose, and counting the dots then put down, found that one
-hundred and sixty-three had been made in twenty-one minutes. I traveled
-on, and still met more the farther I proceeded. The air was literally
-filled with pigeons; the light of noonday was obscured as by an
-eclipse; the dung fell in spots, not unlike melting flakes of snow; and
-the continued buzz of wings had a tendency to lull my senses to repose.
-
-“‘Whilst waiting for dinner at Young’s inn, at the confluence of Salt
-River with the Ohio, I saw, at my leisure, immense legions still going
-by, with a front reaching from beyond the Ohio on the west, and the
-beech-wood forests directly on the east of me. Not a single bird
-alighted, for not a nut or acorn was that year to be seen in the
-neighborhood. They consequently flew so high, that different trials to
-reach them with a capital rifle proved ineffectual; nor did the reports
-disturb them in the least. I cannot describe to you the extreme beauty
-of their aërial evolutions, when a hawk chanced to press upon the rear
-of a flock. At once, like a torrent, and with a noise like thunder,
-they rushed into a compact mass, pressing upon each other toward the
-center. In these almost solid masses, they darted forward in undulating
-and angular lines, descended and swept close over the earth with
-inconceivable velocity, mounted perpendicularly so as to resemble a
-vast column, and, when high, were seen wheeling and twisting within
-their continued lines, which then resembled the coils of a gigantic
-serpent.
-
-“‘Before sunset I reached Louisville, distant from Hardensburgh
-fifty-five miles. The pigeons were still passing in undiminished
-numbers, and continued to do so for three days in succession. The
-people were all in arms. The banks of the Ohio were crowded with men
-and boys, incessantly shooting at the pilgrims, which there flew lower
-as they passed the river. Multitudes were thus destroyed. For a week or
-more, the population fed on no other flesh than that of pigeons, and
-talked of nothing but pigeons. The atmosphere, during this time, was
-strongly impregnated with the peculiar odor which emanates from the
-species....
-
-“‘It may not, perhaps, be out of place to attempt an estimate of the
-number of pigeons contained in one of those mighty flocks, and of the
-quantity of food daily consumed by its members.... Let us take a column
-of one mile in breadth, which is far below the average size, and
-suppose it passing over us without interruption for three hours, at the
-rate mentioned above of one mile in the minute. This will give us a
-parallelogram of 180 miles by 1, covering 180 square miles. Allowing
-two pigeons to the square yard, we have 1,115,136,000 pigeons in one
-flock. As every pigeon daily consumes fully half a pint of food, the
-quantity necessary for supplying this vast multitude must be 8,712,000
-bushels per day.
-
-“‘As soon as the pigeons discover a sufficiency of food to entice them
-to alight, they fly round in circles, reviewing the country below.
-During their evolutions, on such occasions, the dense mass which they
-form exhibits a beautiful appearance, as it changes its direction, now
-displaying a glistening sheet of azure, when the backs of the birds
-come simultaneously into view, and anon suddenly presenting a mass of
-rich deep purple. They then pass lower, over the woods, and for a
-moment are lost among the foliage, but again emerge, and are seen
-gliding aloft. They now alight, but the next moment, as if suddenly
-alarmed, they take to wing, producing by the flappings of their wings a
-noise like the roar of distant thunder, and sweep through the forests
-to see if danger is near. Hunger, however, soon brings them to the
-ground. When alighted, they are seen industriously throwing up the
-withered leaves in quest of the fallen mast. The rear ranks are
-continually rising, passing over the main body, and alighting in front,
-in such rapid succession, that the whole flock seems still on wing. The
-quantity of ground thus swept is astonishing, and so completely has it
-been cleared that the gleaner who might follow in their rear would find
-his labor completely lost. While feeding, their avidity is at times so
-great that in attempting to swallow a large acorn or nut, they are seen
-gasping for a long while, as if in the agonies of suffocation.
-
-“‘On such occasions, when the woods are filled with these pigeons, they
-are killed in immense numbers, although no apparent diminution
-ensues.... As the sun begins to sink beneath the horizon, they depart
-en masse for the roosting-place....
-
-“‘Let us now inspect their place of nightly rendezvous. One of these
-curious roosting-places, on the banks of the Green River in Kentucky, I
-repeatedly visited. It was, as is always the case, in a portion of the
-forest where the trees were of great magnitude, and where there was
-little underwood.... My first view of it was about a fortnight
-subsequent to the period when they had made choice of it, and I arrived
-there nearly two hours before sunset. Few pigeons were then to be seen,
-but a great number of persons, with horses and wagons, guns and
-ammunition, had already established themselves on the borders. Two
-farmers from the vicinity of Russelsville, distant more than a hundred
-miles, had driven upwards of three hundred hogs to be fattened on the
-pigeons which were to be slaughtered. Here and there the people
-employed in plucking and salting what had already been procured, were
-seen sitting in the midst of large piles of these birds. The dung lay
-several inches deep, covering the whole extent of the roosting-place,
-like a bed of snow. Many trees two feet in diameter, I observed, were
-broken off at no great distance from the ground, and the branches of
-many of the largest and tallest had given way, as if the forest had
-been swept by a tornado. Everything proved to me that the number of
-birds resorting to this part of the forest must be immense beyond
-conception. As the period of their arrival approached, their foes
-anxiously prepared to receive them. Some were furnished with iron pots
-containing sulphur, others with torches of pine knots, many with poles,
-and the rest with guns. The sun was lost to our view, yet not a pigeon
-had arrived. Everything was ready, and all eyes were gazing on the
-clear sky, which appeared in glimpses amidst the tall trees. Suddenly
-there burst forth a general cry of “Here they come!” The noise which
-they made, though yet distant, reminded me of a hard gale at sea,
-passing through the rigging of a close-reefed vessel. As the birds
-arrived and passed over me, I felt a current of air that surprised me.
-Thousands were soon knocked down by the pole-men. The birds continue to
-pour in. The fires were lighted, and a magnificent, as well as
-wonderful and almost terrifying, sight, presented itself. The pigeons,
-arriving by thousands, alighted everywhere, one above another, until
-solid masses as large as hogsheads were formed on the branches all
-round. Here and there the perches gave way under the weight with a
-crash, and falling to the ground, destroyed hundreds of the birds
-beneath, forcing down the dense groups with which every stick was
-loaded. It was a scene of uproar and confusion. I found it quite
-useless to speak, or even to shout to those persons who were nearest to
-me. Even the reports of the guns were seldom heard, and I was made
-aware of the firing only by seeing the shooters reloading.
-
-“‘No one dared venture within the line of devastation. The hogs had
-been penned up in due time, the picking up of the dead and wounded
-being left for the next morning’s employment. The pigeons were
-constantly coming, and it was past midnight before I perceived a
-decrease in the number of those that arrived. The uproar continued the
-whole night.... Toward the approach of day, the noise in some measure
-subsided, long before objects were distinguishable, the pigeons began
-to move off in a direction quite different from that in which they had
-arrived the evening before, and at sunrise all that were able to fly
-had disappeared. The howlings of the wolves now reached our ears, and
-the foxes, lynxes, cougars, bears, racoons, opossums, and polecats were
-seen sneaking off, whilst eagles and hawks of different species,
-accompanied by a crowd of vultures, came to supplant them, and enjoy
-their share of the spoil.
-
-“‘It was then that the authors of all this devastation began their
-entry amongst the dead, the dying, and the mangled. The pigeons were
-picked up and piled in heaps, until each had as many as he could
-possibly dispose of, when the hogs were let loose to feed on the
-remainder.’
-
-“Here ends Audubon’s story. What do you think of it, my friends?”
-
-“I think,” Jules replied, “that those flocks of pigeons darkening the
-sky and taking several days to pass over are the most astonishing thing
-I have ever heard of about birds.”
-
-“And I,” said Emile, “am still thinking of that shower of dung that
-falls from the sky, as thick as flakes of snow in winter, when the
-pigeons are flying over. Everywhere they fly the ground is whitened
-with this singular shower.”
-
-“And those trees breaking under the pigeons’ weight,” Louis exclaimed;
-“those three hundred pigs let loose to surfeit on what the hunters have
-left—all that would seem incredible to me if Uncle Paul had not assured
-us it was so.”
-
-“It’s a great pity,” sighed Emile, “that we have no such flocks of
-pigeons here. If they are knocked down with nothing but a pole, as we
-knock down apples and nuts, I would undertake to bag a fine lot
-myself.”
-
-“Would you also,” his uncle asked him, “undertake to find food for the
-pigeons, when for a single day’s supply for one of their flocks it
-takes from eight to nine million bushels of seeds? You see well enough
-that such multitudes would be calamitous: the entire harvest of a
-province would scarcely be enough to fill the crops of these ravenous
-birds. Such flocks require vast tracts of woodland not exploited by
-man, such as America had sixty years ago, in Audubon’s time. But
-to-day, in that country, as civilization extends its boundaries the
-primeval forests disappear and give place to cultivated fields. Food
-becoming scarce, pigeons also become scarce; and it is doubtful whether
-one could ever again witness such prodigious scenes as formerly.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XVII
-
-A SUPPOSITION
-
-
-“Let us suppose ourselves, my friends, in the heart of a desert
-country, left to shift for ourselves, without any of the resources that
-come with civilization. To defend life and procure food are our
-constant great care. Around us extend endless dark woods where roar,
-howl, bellow a thousand ferocious animals that would tear us to pieces
-with their claws or quarter us with their horns if they took us by
-surprise. To shelter ourselves from their attack, we have to choose
-between the refuge of a grotto, the mouth of which we close with
-fragments of rock rolled painfully into place, and the hollow trunk of
-an old tree, or, better, its large branches, if we can manage to climb
-up to them.”
-
-“It is the story of Robinson Crusoe on his Island,” Emile interrupted.
-
-“Not quite. I am supposing our state much worse than his. Robinson
-Crusoe had at his disposal a quantity of things saved from the
-shipwreck—tools of all kinds, formidable weapons, guns, powder, and
-shot. We have nothing, absolutely nothing but our ten fingers.”
-
-“Not even a knife to cut a stick with?” asked Emile.
-
-“Not even a knife.”
-
-“Rather an unpleasant situation,” remarked Louis; “and all the more so
-as we couldn’t stay shut up all the time. We should have to leave our
-grotto to procure food, and then beware of the wolves and all the
-dangerous creatures in the wood.”
-
-“Nothing imparts courage like the terrible need of food. We should
-start out, then, armed with some stones and with a stick clumsily
-broken off with our hands. If the wild beast runs at us we shall do our
-best to knock it down.”
-
-“But what if we don’t succeed?” was Emile’s query.
-
-“In that case we are done for: we shall become its prey.”
-
-“To tell the truth, Uncle, in spite of the pleasure the reading of
-Robinson Crusoe on his Island gave me, I prefer this trip through the
-woods to be simply a supposition on your part rather than a reality.”
-
-“Emile is not the only one of that opinion,” declared Jules. “When I
-have nothing to defend myself with I don’t like those woods where there
-are wolves and still worse things.”
-
-“I continue my supposition. Hunger drives us and we start. I assume
-that heaven favors us and that no serious danger comes to disturb us in
-our hunt for something to keep us from starving. If we are on the
-seashore we shall catch shell-fish; if inland, we shall gather berries
-from the brambles and sloes from the thicket. If we hunt long enough we
-may perhaps find a handful or two of hazel-nuts. That will be our
-dinner, which will beguile our hunger for a while without satisfying
-it.”
-
-“I should think so,” exclaimed Emile. “Berries and sloes, and nothing
-else—a sorry feast! I’d rather have a crust of bread, no matter how
-hard.”
-
-“So had I. But the crust of bread means cultivated fields, the
-husbandman, the harvester, the miller, and the baker; it presupposes an
-advanced civilization, whereas we are in a wilderness. We must do
-without the crust of bread. If, however, you find something better than
-berries and sloes, I will gladly give up the detestable fruit.”
-
-“Since the woods where you suppose us to be,” said Jules, “are full of
-all sorts of animals, there ought to be game in abundance.”
-
-“Yes, indeed, game is there in plenty.”
-
-“Well, then; let us hunt it, and then we will light a fire and I will
-see to roasting what we have got. That will be much better than horrid
-sloes, sour enough to set your teeth on edge.”
-
-“That is a good idea, but I see two great difficulties: first, we must
-catch the game; secondly, we must make a fire.”
-
-“Making a fire is the easiest thing in the world,” Emile declared. “All
-we need is a match, as long as there is plenty of wood.”
-
-“You forget, my friend, that there are no matches. We have nothing,
-absolutely nothing.”
-
-“That is true. What shall we do, then? If I remember right, Robinson
-Crusoe too had no end of trouble in making a fire. He finally found a
-tree that had been set on fire by lightning.”
-
-“Would you wait for a thunderstorm to come and set fire to a corner of
-the forest? Long before that we should have time to starve, for it is
-very seldom that lightning starts a fire.”
-
-“Must we, then, give up the roast that I was proposing?” Jules asked.
-
-“Before giving it up we might try the means employed by certain savage
-tribes for obtaining fire. The operator takes his seat on the ground
-and holds between his feet a piece of soft and very dry wood in which a
-small cavity has been hollowed; then he twirls rapidly between his
-hands a stick of hard wood with its point in the cavity. As a result of
-this energetic friction the soft wood becomes heated at the bottom of
-the hollow, and ends by catching fire. Success necessitates, it is
-true, a rapidity of friction and a skill that certainly we should not
-be able to acquire without a long apprenticeship; but I pass over that
-difficulty and assume that we have a fire.
-
-“Now for the game. A hare will be a great plenty for us. This animal
-abounds, and we should be very unskilful if we did not soon find one
-curling its mustaches with its velvety paw under a tuft of broom. But
-the hare has quick ears and sharp eyes. Long before we can get within
-striking distance it hears and sees us, and decamps. Run after it now
-if you think you can catch it.”
-
-“For my part,” said Jules, “I won’t undertake it.”
-
-“With the weapons we possess,” Louis admitted, “with only our sticks
-and stones, the chase seems to me out of the question: all game of
-whatever sort would foil our attempts by its vigilance and rapid
-flight.”
-
-“Are you all thoroughly convinced of it?” asked Uncle Paul.
-
-“I certainly am,” replied Jules. “Not being able to match the game in
-fleetness of foot, we shall always come back from the hunt
-empty-handed.”
-
-“That’s plain enough,” Emile assented.
-
-“Then let us be content with sloes, and if hunger presses too hard we
-must tighten our belts. Since, too, at any moment, some furious wild
-beast might pounce upon us and devour us, let us lose no time in
-getting back to reflect on our sad plight.
-
-“Our wretched state is indeed lamentable. Incessant hunger torments us,
-despite the extreme abundance of game, which would be an invaluable
-resource for us, but which unfortunately we cannot turn to account. If,
-to stay our hunger, we go in search of wild fruit, a thousand dangers
-await us. We may fall into clutches that no stone will intimidate and
-no sticks cause to relax. We are without provisions, defenseless. A
-terrible alternative awaits us: to die of hunger or be devoured by
-those that are stronger than we.”
-
-“Such a Robinson Crusoe life I should not care for,” declared Emile.
-
-“Now let us suppose one thing more: Heaven takes pity on our distress
-and, to extricate us from our difficulty, offers us the aid of one of
-our domestic animals, whichever one we choose to name. Which will you
-ask for, children?”
-
-“My stomach is so tired of sloes,” Emile replied, “and my teeth are so
-set on edge with this sour fruit that I think I should choose a sheep.
-Some cutlets broiled over live coals would make up to me for my dinners
-on wild berries.”
-
-“But the sheep will soon be eaten up,” objected Jules, “and then back
-you go once more to the sloes. I should prefer a goat. Every evening it
-would come back to the grotto with its big udders swollen with milk. In
-this way I should be sure of food with some variety, because I could
-make butter and cheese out of the milk.”
-
-“Your goat will perhaps not last so long as Emile’s sheep. It must go
-out to get pasturage, and who can say that it will not be devoured by
-wolves in the woods the first time it ventures forth?”
-
-“I will keep careful watch over it.”
-
-“But who will watch over you, my friend? Who will protect you?”
-
-“That’s so. Let us give up the goat and choose a cow. She is strong
-enough to defend herself with her horns.”
-
-“If one wolf is not enough, they will bring to the attack two, three,
-ten, and the cow will be overcome.”
-
-“The horse, mule, or donkey, in our supposed circumstances, cannot be
-very useful to us. I leave them out. With a hen I should at least have
-an egg a day.”
-
-“A poor dependence if one hen’s egg has to be divided between four.
-Besides, what grain have you for feeding your hen? And how about the
-fox—will he leave her in peace?”
-
-“The pig is still left,” was Jules’s final suggestion. “But there we
-have the same difficulty as with Emile’s sheep: once the animal is
-eaten, hunger overtakes us again. I leave the choice to some one
-cleverer than I.”
-
-“My choice,” said Louis, “would be the dog, without a moment’s
-hesitation.”
-
-“What a queer choice!” cried Emile. “The dog will lick our hands in
-sign of friendship, he will bark in front of the grotto, and he will
-gnaw the bone we throw to him. But as there are no bones in our dinners
-of sloes, the poor beast will die of hunger without being of any use to
-us whatever.”
-
-“I can find use for him,” replied Louis, “and it is a great one. With
-the dog, game, even the nimblest hare, will be caught in the chase,
-with such ambuscade as we can contrive on our part, and food will be
-assured for all—flesh for us, bones for the dog. Accompanied by him, we
-can go wherever we please, without the continual fear of being attacked
-any moment. If a wolf appears, our vigorous companion will cope with
-it, seize it by the nape of the neck, and give us a chance to lay on
-with the cudgel.”
-
-“Louis is right,” declared Jules; “I vote for the dog.”
-
-“The reasons Louis gives,” Emile chimed in, “are too clear to admit of
-any but a unanimous vote in the dog’s favor.”
-
-“Yes, my friend,” his uncle rejoined, “unanimous, even to the vote of
-your Uncle Paul, who for some moments has been making you live Robinson
-Crusoe’s life in imagination for the express purpose of leading you to
-decide for yourselves in favor of the dog.
-
-“In the early days, centuries and centuries ago, man lived mostly by
-the chase, as to-day the last surviving savage tribes still live. The
-raising of herds, the tilling of the soil, the manufacture of goods,
-all were unknown. Wild animals, hunted in the forests with stone
-weapons and pointed sticks, furnished almost the only resource. Their
-flesh gave food, their skins provided clothing. To catch the game, a
-fleet-footed auxiliary in the chase was necessary; to keep these
-dangerous animals in a proper state of awe, a courageous defender was
-needed by man. This auxiliary, this defender, and, best of all, this
-friend, devoted even to death, was the dog; a gift from Heaven to help
-man in his pitiful beginnings. With the aid of the dog, life was
-rendered less perilous, food more assured. Leisure followed, and from
-being a hunter man became a herdsman. The herd was formed, at first
-very indocile and at the slightest lack of watchfulness taking again to
-the wild life of old. Its keeping was confided to the dog, which,
-posted on some rising ground of the pasture, its scent to the wind and
-ear on the watch, followed the herd with vigilant eye and rushed to
-bring back the runaways or to drive off some evil-intentioned beast.
-Thanks to the dog, the herd gave abundance—milk and its products, flesh
-for food, and warm wool for clothing. Then, relieved from the terrible
-anxiety concerning daily provision, man took it into his head to dig in
-the earth and make it produce grain. Agriculture sprang into being, and
-with it, little by little, civilization. By the very force of
-circumstances, therefore, man in all countries is at first a hunter,
-later he becomes a herdsman, and ends by being an agriculturist. The
-dog is absolutely necessary to him, first for hunting, then for
-watching and defending the herd. Of all our domestic animals,
-accordingly, the dog is the earliest on record and the one that has
-rendered us the greatest service.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XVIII
-
-A FRAGMENT OF HISTORY
-
-
-“I understand,” began Jules, “the usefulness of the dog to a man left
-to his own resources in a desert country in the midst of woods. With
-the help of this courageous friend he procures food and defends himself
-against animals that endanger his life. But in our countries around
-here, it seems to me, that wretched sort of existence can never have
-been known.”
-
-“In our countries things took their course just as everywhere else,”
-his uncle replied. “Even in places now enjoying the most advanced
-civilization, man began with an era of misery of which it will be not
-unprofitable to give you some idea; then you will see better from what
-depths of barbarism the dog’s services have helped to raise us.
-
-“In the earliest times of which history has preserved some vague
-record, what was one day to be the beautiful country of France was a
-wild country covered with immense forests, where, living by the chase,
-there wandered some few tribes of Gaels; for thus the first inhabitants
-of our country were called. They were men of low stature, broad
-shoulders, white skin, long blond hair, and blue or green eyes. For
-weapons they had stone axes and knives, arrows tipped with fish-bones
-or a sharp piece of flint. Fastened to the left arm, they carried for
-defense a long and narrow wooden shield; with the right hand they
-brandished, as an offensive weapon, sometimes a stake hardened in the
-fire, sometimes a heavy bludgeon or club. For the perilous passage of
-rivers and of ocean inlets they had fragile little boats made of
-wicker, plaited as in our baskets, but covered on the outside with the
-hide of a wild ox to exclude the water.”
-
-“But those are the weapons and boats of savages!” interposed Emile.
-
-“Without doubt, my friend; and, equally without doubt, the first Gaels,
-ancestors of ours though they were, were veritable savages, differing
-hardly at all from those of our own day. They lived mainly by the
-chase, herds and agriculture being for ages unknown to them. In their
-gloomy forests, damp and cold, using only their poor weapons of stone
-and pointed sticks, they attacked a terrible wild ox, the aurochs or
-urus, which is now almost extinct. This ox, nearly as large as the
-elephant, had enormous horns, a mane of curly wool on its head and
-neck, beard under its throat, a deep, hoarse bellow, and a ferocious
-look. Its extraordinary strength and indomitable fury made it the
-terror of the forests.”
-
-“And weren’t they afraid,” asked Louis, “to attack this fearful
-creature with their stone hatchets?”
-
-“They fell upon the furious animal without other weapons than pointed
-stakes and stone hatchets; but they had the help of powerful dogs that
-seized the beast by the ears and got the mastery of it. The urus held
-the place of honor among game. The valiant huntsman who killed it had
-for a cup, at the banqueting board, one of the animal’s monstrous
-horns.”
-
-“What did they drink from those horns?” Emile inquired.
-
-“At first clear water from the fountains; then, after the race had made
-some little progress, an intoxicating drink called cervisia, made from
-fermented barley. That was the forerunner of our beer.”
-
-“Can it be,” asked Louis, “that our peaceful ox came from that
-intractable beast, the urus, as you call it?”
-
-“Not at all. The domestic ox is a different kind altogether,
-originating in Asia and not in the ancient forests of Europe. In our
-day there is hardly a urus left. Hunted century after century by
-growing civilization, the formidable ox with a mane has long since
-deserted these regions to take refuge in the solitudes of the North.
-But these solitudes in turn have been taken possession of by man, and
-the aurochs has found its last retreat in the swampy forests of
-Lithuania in Poland. There a few pairs still live in perfect security,
-for it is expressly forbidden to kill them.”
-
-“And why do they keep those ugly oxen?” was Emile’s next question.
-
-“They are not numerous enough to do any harm, and it would really be a
-pity to exterminate the last one of these animals that afforded our
-ancestors such joy in the hunt.
-
-“The Gaels hunted the elk also, a kind of large stag the size of a
-horse or even larger. The elk has under its throat a kind of goiter or
-fleshy pendant; its fur is short, stiff, and ash-colored; its horns,
-called antlers, are wide-spreading and flattened, and they extend in a
-vast triangular expanse with a deeply indented outline; the weight of
-each antler may amount to as much as thirty kilograms. That must, as
-you see, be a fine specimen of game: an animal that bears on its
-forehead, without effort, an ornament weighing a hundred weight and
-more.”
-
-“A stag as large as a horse must really be a noble prize for a hunter,”
-said Louis.
-
-“Without his companion, the dog,” Jules put in, “man certainly could
-not have caught such an animal in the chase.”
-
-“The elk,” resumed Uncle Paul, “though common at that period in our
-forests, is found to-day only in the wooded marshes of Russia and
-Sweden. It also inhabits, and in greater numbers, the northern part of
-America.
-
-“You will notice that these two animals, the aurochs and the elk, which
-were formerly spread over our own regions, are now settled in climates
-much colder than ours. The few aurochs that have survived the general
-destruction of their species graze in the woods of Lithuania; the elk
-inhabits the extreme north of Europe and America. Transported to our
-warmer climate, they would soon perish, being unable to endure a
-temperature too high for them. Since they flourished here in ancient
-times, the climate of our regions must at that distant epoch have been
-colder, more severe, than it is to-day. Immense forests, always damp
-and full of shade, were doubtless one of the causes of this more
-rigorous climate. When these woods, impenetrable to the rays of the
-sun, were felled by the ax of nascent civilization, the soil warmed up
-freely and the temperature rose. But then the aurochs and elk, harassed
-besides by man, who explored all their retreats, fled a country too
-warm for them and took refuge in the cold fogs of the North.
-
-“Despite this change of climate some animals have remained with us the
-same as in the old time of the Gaels. In our day the same wolf still
-howls with hunger in the woods, the same bears haunt the mountain
-caves, the same wild boar, beset by a pack of hounds in some bushy
-thicket, pokes its bristly snout out of the brake, sharpens its tusks,
-and gnashes its teeth as formerly when a band of tattooed hunters flung
-their stone hatchets at its head.”
-
-“Those first inhabitants of France were tattooed like island savages?”
-asked Jules.
-
-“Yes, my friend. They decorated their bodies with designs in blue, a
-pigment extracted from a plant called woad; and to make the decoration
-ineffaceable they forced the coloring matter into the skin by pricking
-themselves till the blood flowed.
-
-“This practice, called tattooing, is still found in our day in many
-countries, among tribes unacquainted with the benefits of civilization.
-At the other end of the world, at our antipodes, the natives of New
-Zealand are most expert in this kind of decoration. With a sharp awl,
-impregnated with divers colors, they prick themselves with little stabs
-and trace, point by point, fanciful designs which turn their skin into
-veritable living embroidery. Red and blue spirals turn in inverse
-directions from both sides of the forehead and continue in rose-work on
-the cheeks. Little palm-leaves spread over the nostrils; a sun darts
-its rays all around the chin; two or three little stars give a blue
-tinge to the lower lip. The rest of the body is ornamented in the same
-lavish manner: fantastic animals cover the middle of the back; a
-tortoise pokes out its head and four feet in the hollow of the breast;
-the hands and feet, pricked in fine tracery patterns, look as if
-covered with open-work gloves and stockings. Our ancestors of the
-stone-hatchet age decorated themselves very much like this.”
-
-“Those poor New Zealanders,” remarked Emile, “must hurt themselves
-dreadfully, disfiguring themselves like that.”
-
-“The operation is indeed most painful, and yet they bear it without a
-murmur. A single needle-prick makes us recoil; those rude savages
-remain unmoved while the tattoo artist punctures their bodies with his
-awl.”
-
-“Why do they submit to such a torture?”
-
-“Chiefly that they may cut a more dashing figure, present a more
-formidable aspect, before the enemy. In certain archipelagoes of
-Polynesia we should find still stranger customs. One tribe, for
-example, gashes the face by removing narrow strips of skin so that the
-cicatrized wounds form various patterns in hideous little red weals.
-Others pass a small pointed stick through the cartilage of the
-nostrils; others make a large hole in the lower lip and set a shell in
-it.
-
-“Had the ancient Gaels similar customs? It is quite possible; at least
-it is certain that they tattooed themselves with woad. Certain customs
-are sometimes so tenacious that after many centuries in the midst of
-the most flourishing civilization tattooing has not entirely
-disappeared even with us. On the strong arms of some of our laborers
-are seen, any day, tattooed in blue, trade emblems and other devices.
-They are, without doubt, the survivals of primitive customs.
-
-“The Gaels had long, silky hair, like flaxen tow, and they gave it a
-tinge of bright red by frequent washing in lime lye. Sometimes they
-smeared it with rancid grease and let it hang down over their shoulders
-in all its length; sometimes they gathered it above the forehead in a
-high tuft or mane, to make themselves look taller and to give
-themselves a more terrifying aspect.”
-
-“In a book of travels,” said Jules, “I saw pictures of some North
-American Indians with a tuft of hair like that on top of the head. The
-Gaels, then, had the same custom?”
-
-“Yes, my child. Thousands of years apart, in the forests of the Old
-World and those of the New, the Gael and the Indian adopt the same
-head-dress, a coil of hair over the forehead. When he dresses for the
-combat, the Indian fastens to his top-knot of hair divers ornaments,
-such as the wing of a hawk, the claw of a leopard, the teeth of a bear.
-Thus doubtless the Gael likewise adorned his person when he made
-himself fine for the urus-hunt or for battle with some neighboring
-tribe.
-
-“The Indian’s top-knot is an audacious defiance, a horrible bravado.
-When the enemy is thrown to the ground, beaten down by a blow of the
-club, the conqueror seizes him by his top-knot, cuts the skin all round
-the head with the point of a sharp flint, then with a jerk pulls off
-the bleeding scalp all in one piece.”
-
-“Oh, how horrible!” cried Jules.
-
-“This scalp is a trophy which he will dry in the smoke of his hut and
-will wear hanging from his waist as token of his exploit. His position
-in the tribe, his weight in the council, are proportioned to the number
-of scalps taken from the enemy. Now you understand the fierce bravado
-of the Indian with his top-knot of hair all gathered up and ready for
-the horrible operation. Let any one offer to touch it, and he will soon
-feel the weight of the wearer’s club.”
-
-“I hope the Gaels did not have that abominable custom.”
-
-“They had one that was worse: they carried not only the scalp, but the
-whole head, which they dried in the sun, after nailing it by the ears
-to the entrance of the hut in the midst of hunting trophies, boars’
-heads and wolves’ heads. Those were their titles of nobility.”
-
-“And we are descended from those frightful savages?”
-
-“The tattooed Gaels with red hair, nailing the enemy’s head to their
-door, are, as far back as history can show, the first inhabitants of
-our country; we count them as among our earliest ancestors. Some of
-their barbarous customs have come down to us, greatly modified, it is
-true. I have just given you an example, in tattooing; I give you
-another in the matter of trophies of the chase. After the manner of the
-ancient Gaels, it is still the custom in the country to nail to the big
-barn-doors wolves’ and foxes’ heads and the dead bodies of hawks and
-owls.”
-
-“Those who do that,” said Louis, “little suspect to what horrible
-custom their practice is related.”
-
-“Your tattooed hunters interest me very much,” Emile declared. “Their
-houses, dress, furniture—how about all those things?”
-
-“In those wretched times a shelter under rocks, a natural excavation, a
-grotto, were the first dwelling-places. But there came a day when those
-wild retreats were found insufficient, and human ingenuity made its
-first attempts in the art of building. To provide oneself with a
-shelter was not enough; it was necessary above all to maintain an
-unremitting state of defense. The forests were overrun with formidable
-animals, and there was perpetual warfare between neighboring tribes. As
-a safeguard against surprise, wherever there were lakes, the houses
-were built on piling in the middle of the water.
-
-“It must have taken a prodigious expenditure of energy for man, as yet
-so poorly provided with tools, to build these lake villages, or
-lacustrine villages, as they are called. With a stone ax the tree that
-was to be felled was laboriously girdled at the base, and then the
-application of fire completed the process. Whole days and perhaps the
-united efforts of a number of workers were necessary to obtain one
-joist such as a wood-cutter would now turn out with a few strokes of
-his steel ax. But with their tools of flint, hardly hitting the wood
-and falling to pieces with the slightest maladroit blow, it was an
-enormous undertaking for them. They were in about the same plight that
-our carpenters would be in if the latter were obliged to cut down and
-trim an oak with nothing but an old rusty knife. I leave you to
-imagine, then, the labor and patience expended in obtaining the
-thousands of joists needed in this piling. Apparently each head of a
-family furnished one as his share, which gave him the right to erect
-his hut on the common building-lot. At a later period, perhaps, in
-order to extend the area of the straggling village as the population
-increased, the furnishing of a new pile was required of each adult male
-inhabitant. It was the extraordinary contribution, the sacred debt,
-that he was obliged to pay once in his lifetime.
-
-“The piles, pointed and hardened in the fire at one end, were dragged
-to the edge of the lake, where canoes of plaited wicker towed them to
-the chosen spot. There they were stood on end and driven into the soft
-mud until the tops were on a level with the water. Finally the spaces
-between the multitude of piles were filled with stones. The whole
-formed an artificial islet of great solidity, or rather a shoal
-submerged and covered with several feet of water. On the tops of the
-piles, just above the general level, cross-beams were laid, then boughs
-of trees, and on top of these beaten earth. Finally, on this artificial
-soil, beneath which circulated the waters of the lake, dwellings were
-erected.
-
-“They were round or oval huts, made of a framework of interlacing
-branches and a layer of rich earth. A single opening, very low, through
-which one had to crawl, gave access to an interior, not unlike our
-baker’s oven.
-
-“The furnishing corresponded with the rudeness of the dwelling. Big
-tun-bellied pots of black clay variegated with grains of white sand
-held the provisions, which consisted of aurochs-flesh dried in the sun,
-beech-nuts, and hazel-nuts. These pots were rudely made by hand without
-any potter’s wheel to give them a regular outline. Thick, misshapen,
-unsteady, they had an uneven surface and bore the finger-marks of those
-who had molded them. Some attempts at ornamentation appeared on the
-best jars, and took the form of a row of imprints made with the end of
-the thumb on the still soft clay, or a line of angular marks engraved
-with a thorn. The rest of the work was not less simple. To give our
-pottery, however slight its value, more consistency and hardness, we
-bake it in a very hot oven; we also coat it with a glaze to make it
-impermeable. The inhabitants of the lake villages were content to
-expose their pieces of wet clay to the rays of the sun until dry,
-without baking or glazing. Hence it was a sorry kind of pottery, good
-for the keeping of provisions, but incapable of holding water or of
-being used over the fire.”
-
-“How did they manage, then,” asked Jules, “to get hot water and cook
-their food?”
-
-“When one is unprovided with the invaluable saucepan, when one is
-without even those homely utensils that we think so little of, despite
-the inestimable service they render us, one imitates the Eskimos of
-Greenland, who cook their viands in a little skin bag.”
-
-“But that queer kind of pot would burn on the fire,” asserted Emile.
-
-“They are very careful not to put it on the fire. Stones are heated
-red-hot in the fire, and after they are thus heated they are popped
-into the little bag containing water and food to be cooked. After
-cooling off they are taken out to be reheated and dropped once more
-into the water, which finally boils. The result of such cooking is a
-mixture of soot, mud, ashes, and half-raw flesh; but with their hearty
-appetites the Eskimos are not over-particular. Besides, if they
-entertain a guest of distinction they begin by licking off with the
-tongue all the dirt on the pieces destined for him. Whoever should
-refuse to accept what was offered him after this extraordinary act of
-courtesy in cleaning it, would be regarded as an impolite, ill-bred
-person.”
-
-“Bah! the dirty things!” cried Emile. “I will take good care never to
-be one of their guests.”
-
-“And the tattooed hunters cooked in that way?” Jules inquired.
-
-“For want of proper utensils they apparently employed similar means.
-But let us finish our inspection of the inside of the aquatic hut.
-
-“The highest point in the roof is pierced for the passage of smoke from
-the fireplace situated in the center of the hut, between two stones on
-a bed of beaten earth, which prevents the floor, made of branches, from
-catching fire. On the walls are hung the hardwood tomahawk, flint
-hatchets, bone arrows, and the net of bark thongs, still damp from
-fishing in the lake and ornamented on the edges with round pierced
-stones. On the branching antlers of a stag the clothes are hung,
-consisting of leopards’ and wolves’ skins with the hair on. In the most
-sheltered corner rush mats and furs carpet the floor for the night’s
-rest. Finally, in front of the door the little wicker boat bobs up and
-down. Into this boat its owners can step right from their threshold.
-
-“The straggling village, in fact, instead of being built on a
-continuous artificial soil, is cut up into numerous passages of open
-water; the village streets are canals. To pass from one quarter to
-another, or merely to visit one’s neighbor, one must go by water. So
-all day long there is a continual coming and going of boats from one
-group of huts to another. There is no less movement between the village
-and the shores of the lake, whither the men go a-hunting and whence
-they return with their boats laden with venison, when the aurochs or
-elk has succumbed to the combined exertions of men and dogs.
-
-“Thus, in prehistoric times, were settlements established on the
-various lakes of France, and, still more, of Switzerland—lakes large
-enough to hold these villages by the hundred. To-day the fisherman
-whose line ripples their limpid waters sees in the blue depths, amid a
-great mass of stones, the tops of piles carbonized by the centuries,
-and large, bulging pieces of earthenware, which he breaks with his oar
-without suspecting their venerable origin. That is what is left us of
-the ancient lake villages.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XIX
-
-THE JACKAL
-
-
-“What you have just told us, Uncle Paul,” Jules remarked, “is not
-unlike what navigators tell us of the life of savages.”
-
-“Nevertheless,” rejoined his uncle, “it is our own history, my friend;
-it is really a chapter of French history.”
-
-“I never read anything like it in my history-book.”
-
-“Your schoolbooks generally begin with the Frankish chief, Pharamond,
-at an epoch when civilization had already made considerable progress,
-and when agriculture and grazing had been known for a long time. My
-story goes back to a much earlier period, one almost lost in the
-darkness of the past, and shows us man in his painful beginnings,
-unskilled and almost wholly dependent on hunting for his food and
-clothing.
-
-“In that state of extreme destitution in which the day’s supply of food
-depended, above all, on fleetness of foot and quickness of scent, the
-dog was the most precious of acquisitions. With its aid, first the game
-fell more abundantly under the stone hatchet and flint-head arrow; then
-came the possibility of the herd, which, furnishing a reserve of food,
-freed man from the alternation of famine and abundance, and gave him
-leisure to devise means for the improvement of his condition. Then the
-ox was tamed, the horse mastered, the sheep domesticated, and finally
-came agriculture, preëminent source of our well-being. That is how the
-tattooed hunters of our country lost the barbarism of their habits and
-advanced from one stage of progress to another, until they became the
-cultivated race from which we are descended. First in Asia, then
-throughout all Europe, a similar development took place: everywhere the
-dog was the first and most valuable of man’s conquests, and everywhere
-the dog has represented the first element of progress. Without the dog,
-no such thing as human society, says an old book of the East, whence
-this most serviceable animal came. And the old book is a thousand times
-right, for without the dog the chase in old times would have been too
-little productive to satisfy the devouring hunger of a very thinly
-scattered population; without the dog, no herds or flocks, no assured
-food, and consequently no leisure, for the inexorable necessity of
-providing food would have occupied the whole time. Without leisure, no
-attempt at culture, no observations leading to the birth of science, no
-reflections bearing fruit in manufactures and commerce. The primitive
-mode of life was a hand-to-mouth existence, with a slice of broiled
-urus or elk to stay the cravings of hunger. A surfeit one day was
-followed by fasting the next; it all depended on the chances of the
-hunt. Hatchets continued to be fashioned out of stone, the tattooing of
-the body in blue went on, and at the entrance to the hut the enemy’s
-head was still nailed as a horrible trophy of war.”
-
-“I see,” said Louis, “how immensely useful the dog has been and still
-is to us; so I should like to know at what time and by whom this
-valuable animal was trained for our service.”
-
-“No one could give a satisfactory answer to that question. The taming
-of the dog goes back to the earliest times and all remembrance of it is
-lost. There is the same deep obscurity as to its origin and the wild
-species from which it is descended. Nowhere has the dog been seen by
-travelers in its primitive state, in a state of complete independence.
-If some dogs are found leading a wild life, they are runaways; that is
-to say, dogs that have fled from domestic life to live as they please
-in desert regions. Such are those that burrow and hunt for themselves
-in the vast plains of South America. They are certainly descended from
-domestic dogs carried thither by Europeans; for at the time of its
-discovery, nearly four centuries ago, the New World had no dogs. All
-that can be affirmed is that the dog came to us from Asia already
-trained for man’s use. Apparently Asia made a gift to Europe of the
-oldest known domestic animals, such as the ox, the ass, and the hen.
-
-“On account of the almost infinite variety in respect to its coat, its
-shape, and its size, it is suspected that the dog is not derived from a
-single source but comes from various species that have been improved by
-man and profoundly modified in their characteristics by cross-breeding.
-Among these wild species to which is given the honor of being regarded
-as ancestors of the domestic dog, I will mention the jackal, which
-abounds in Africa as well as Asia.
-
-“The jackal looks a little like the wolf, but is smaller and is
-harmless to man. Its coat is red, varied with white under the stomach
-and black on the back. It has a pointed muzzle and erect ears. Its
-timidity causes it to feed on the remnants left over by animals bolder
-and stronger than itself. When the gorged lion abandons its
-half-devoured prey, the jackals, crouching in the neighborhood and
-waiting until his lordship has finished, hasten up in companies to the
-disdained carcass and clean it to the bone. For the same reason the
-jackal frequents in troops the outskirts of villages and encampments in
-the hope of finding garbage and carrion. In the daytime it stays
-quietly in its den among the rocks, but at nightfall it issues forth in
-quest of food with a sort of sharp howling that continues all night.
-There is nothing so disagreeable as the nocturnal concert of a band of
-jackals prowling around dwellings. One of them begins with a cry
-something like argee in a very piercing and prolonged tone. Scarcely
-has it finished when a second takes up the refrain and improves upon
-it; then a third and a fourth, until the whole band has joined in,
-producing a veritable charivari composed of a mixed chorus of
-discordant howls. After this musical feat, solos are in order again,
-interspersed with choral productions; and so it goes on until daybreak.
-Such is the infernal music that awaits the sleeper every night.”
-
-“Oh, what disagreeable neighbors!” exclaimed Jules. “If the dog had
-kept any of those detestable habits it would be a very troublesome
-animal, useful though it is.”
-
-“The dog shows not seldom, it must be admitted, a mania for making the
-night hideous; but it cannot be reproached with anything comparable to
-the jackal’s concert. The dog has two cries, without counting those
-that are secondary. One of the two is natural, the howl; the other
-artificial, the bark. Is it necessary to point out to you the
-difference between the two?”
-
-“I know what you mean, Uncle,” Jules was quick to reply. “The dog howls
-when it gives a long, wild cry, so mournful and terrifying in the
-night; it barks when it gives those short, jerky yelps. It howls from
-fright, sadness, ennui; it barks with joy and pleasure.”
-
-“Yes, that is it. I told you, then, that howling is the dog’s natural
-voice. In it can be found, but with a very different action of the
-throat and a less sharp tone, something of the jackal’s cry. As for the
-bark, it is an artificial utterance; that is to say, it has been
-acquired. Dogs that have gone back to the wild state, as for example
-those of South America, can no longer bark. Deserters from
-civilization, they have lost the language and are reduced to their
-primitive howling, which they share with the jackal and the wolf.”
-
-“And how does a dog learn to bark when it is with us?”
-
-“It learns by hearing its fellows, the other dogs, bark. If it were
-brought up far from its own kind, it would never know how to bark, any
-more than we could speak our language if we had never heard it spoken.
-Well, the jackal also can acquire the habit of barking by education.
-Placed in company with the dog, which by its example initiates it into
-a new language, it barks at first badly, then a little better, then
-well, and in a short time the scholar almost equals the master.
-
-“The primitive species, if it really is the jackal, must have, as you
-see, undergone profound changes affecting even its most inveterate
-habits, to become the domestic dog. It must have lost its habit of
-nocturnal prowling, forgotten its predilection for concerts of
-ear-piercing cries, learned to bark, and, what is far more difficult,
-exchanged its timidity for boldness. Another improvement was
-indispensable. The jackal gives forth from all over its body a strong
-fishy smell. To become the companion of man and to live in his home,
-the animal had to be rid of this infection. That is what the progress
-of time has done almost completely: to-day the dog has scarcely any
-odor except when warm from rapid hunting; but it is likely, in view of
-its presumed origin, that in the beginning the dog was not precisely a
-bouquet of roses beside its master. Doubtless it was denied access to
-the hut, which it would have infected with its odor, and was relegated
-to a distant spot outside in the open air.
-
-“Those are not all the jackal’s defects. It is true the animal is
-easily tamed, but without acquiring the docility and attachment of the
-dog. When pressed by hunger, it is gentle and caressing toward the
-master who gives it something to eat; when satiated, it shows its teeth
-and tries to bite if any one reaches out to take hold of it. Children,
-whom dogs so love to play with, do not gain its confidence any more
-than grown people. Whoever should try to pull its tail in play would
-certainly get bitten.”
-
-“Our Medor has a much better disposition,” said Emile; “the more pranks
-I play with him, the better he likes it. I’d a good deal rather play
-with him than with a stinking jackal.”
-
-“Medor owes his excellent qualities, particularly his honest, dogged
-patience, to the extraordinary pains taken during long centuries to
-improve his breed; but certainly the primitive dog must have been a
-pretty rough playmate for little boys. He did not allow any one to pull
-his mustache, did not give the paw, did not play dead with four legs in
-the air, did not wait for the command to jump and snap the crust of
-bread placed on the tip of his nose. The jackal, docile only when
-hungry, shows you what could be expected from Medor’s surly ancestors.”
-
-“Then even with much care the tame jackal never acquires the dog’s
-gentleness?” queried Louis.
-
-“Never. Some, more tractable than others, grow a little more gentle,
-but without ever becoming entirely submissive. They always retain
-something of their primitive wildness and cannot be left wholly free
-without committing misdeeds or even running away from home.”
-
-“If thorough taming is impossible, I don’t see how the dog can come
-from the jackal.”
-
-“Complete domestication does not take place so quickly as you think, my
-dear friend. A long succession of individuals is necessary,
-transmitting from one to another the desired aptitudes, and increasing
-them by turning to account such gain as may be noted in the best
-examples of each new generation. Let us assume that in ancient times
-man had taken into his keeping the half-tamed jackal, such as we could
-to-day possess ourselves of. However surly it may remain, the animal
-will be better after several years’ education than it was at the
-beginning. With continued care the good qualities acquired, though
-weak, will, as we say of the snowball, increase by rolling. In fact it
-is a rule, as well with beasts as with us, that the son inherits the
-father’s qualities, good or bad. Thus the jackal’s little ones, brought
-up with man, will from their birth be half-tamed, as were their
-parents. As character is far from being the same in a whole family,
-some will be wilder, others more submissive. The first are rejected,
-the second kept, as soon as it is possible to recognize this diversity
-of disposition. Here, then, the sons, with continued training, become
-superior to the fathers. The same care, the same selection, in the
-third generation, will insure increased progress in the grandchildren.
-The acquired improvement will be transmitted by inheritance to the
-great-grandchildren, these will still further add to it, and it will be
-inherited by their descendants, or, if not by all, at least by some.
-These latter will be raised in preference to the others. However slight
-the progress from one generation to the next, it will continually be
-added to by the intervention of man who always selects for breeding
-purposes the most promising offspring, until, little by little, in
-course of time the beast that was intractable in the beginning at last
-becomes docile.
-
-“This onward march, which is kept up by accumulating in the animal,
-through inheritance, the qualities desired, by always picking out the
-individual possessing these qualities in the highest degree, is called
-selection, meaning choice or sorting. The method of selection, which
-to-day still renders the greatest service to the perfecting of species,
-has doubtless played an important part in the domestication of the dog;
-but that alone is not what has made the dog such as we now have him.
-The astonishing variety of dogs can only be explained by the multiplex
-origin of the animal and the crossing of the various breeds. I have
-just told you of one species, the common jackal, which is suspected to
-be one of the dog’s ancestors. To finish what I have to say on this
-exceedingly obscure question, I will add a few words concerning a
-second species.
-
-“There is found in the mountains of Abyssinia a jackal with very
-slender body, an arched abdomen, long and narrow head, long,
-upward-curling tail—in short, a veritable greyhound in every respect
-except that it has erect instead of drooping ears. Everything induces
-belief that this jackal is the progenitor of our greyhound.
-
-“I will end with this conclusion of one of our most learned masters on
-the origin of domestic animals: ‘Existing in great numbers in Asia,
-where, history tells us, the dog was first domesticated, jackals
-commonly live within reach of human habitations, to which they
-sometimes make their way of their own accord. They are eminently
-sociable, are easily tamed, and become attached to their masters. They
-associate freely with the dog. Finally, and this trait dispels my last
-lingering doubt as to their kinship, they resemble in the highest
-degree, both in shape and in color, and even in voice where they have
-learned to bark, the least modified of the canine species. In several
-countries the resemblance between jackals and dogs is so striking that
-it has led all travelers who have had an opportunity to compare these
-animals on the spot to the same conclusion: the jackal and the dog
-represent respectively the parent stock and the scion, and are to be
-found reunited again in various parts of Asia and Africa.’”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XX
-
-THE CHIEF BREEDS OF DOGS
-
-
-“Let us not dwell further on the dog’s origin—a very obscure question,
-concerning which all that one can say is nothing but supposition,
-although more or less plausible. Let us turn to the study of the animal
-as found in a state of domestication.
-
-“It would be hard to discover two dogs exactly alike. Were they of the
-same breed, the same shape and size, they would differ in coat, at
-least in some details. Three colors, red, white, and black, belong to
-the dog’s coat; sometimes one alone for the whole body, sometimes all
-mixed, sometimes the three distributed in spots or in great splashes.
-If the coloring is varied, the spots are hardly ever arranged in order,
-but scattered by chance. There is want of symmetry in their
-distribution; or, in other words, on the two halves of the body, the
-right and left, the spots do not correspond. You might say the same of
-most domestic animals: you would nearly always note differences between
-two oxen, two horses, two goats, two cats; and would find that in the
-same animal both sides of the body are not exactly alike in the
-arrangement of the colors.
-
-“It is just the reverse with wild animals: there is close resemblance
-between individuals of the same species, and symmetry of coloring on
-the two halves of the body. As one is, so are all, with very slight
-exceptions; as is the right side, so is the left. Whoever has seen one
-wolf has seen all wolves; whoever has seen from one side an animal with
-variegated coat has seen both sides. One of the most constant effects,
-therefore, of domestication is the replacing of this primitive
-regularity in color by irregularity, this similarity in individuals by
-dissimilarity.
-
-“The dog’s coat goes contrary to every rule except in one most curious
-respect: if the animal is spotted with white, one of these white spots
-is always on the end of the tail. Examine a black dog, for example: if
-you see so much as one white speck on it, no matter where, on the
-flank, or on the shoulder, you will be sure to see one where I told
-you. Look at the end of the tail and you will find at least a touch of
-white there.”
-
-“So it is enough to see some white on any part of a dog to be sure that
-it will have some also on the tip of its tail?” This from Jules.
-
-“Certainly,” replied his uncle, “unless, of course, the animal has had
-its tail cut, in which case I will not answer for it.”
-
-“That is plain enough: with the tip of the tail missing the white touch
-is missing too.”
-
-“I will add that if the dog has only one white spot, that spot will
-always be on the tip of the tail.”
-
-“That singularity must have a reason?” queried Louis.
-
-“Doubtless it has a reason, for nothing is left to chance in this
-world, not even the tuft of hair at the tip of an animal’s tail. I will
-tell you, then, that the various wild species akin to the dog, jackals
-in particular, have, most of them, a white spot on the tip of the tail.
-It is a sort of family trait which the dog, their ally, perhaps their
-descendant, is sure to imitate every time it admits any white into its
-coat. Strange development! If the dog comes, as is supposed, from the
-jackal, it has lost its primitive savagery, its bad odor, its nocturnal
-cries, and has faithfully retained from its ancestry only the plume at
-the end of its tail. I will not undertake to explain why, in a
-fundamental change of habits, one insignificant detail, a mere nothing,
-shows greater tenacity and remains.
-
-“To the differences in color are added differences in the quantity and
-quality of the hair. Most dogs have short, smooth hair; some have fine,
-curly hair, and look as if clothed in wool. Such is the barbet, also
-called sheep-dog, because its fur reminds one of the curly fleece of a
-sheep. Others, like the spaniel, have long and wavy hair, especially on
-the ears and tail. Finally, there are some wretched, unsightly dogs
-with the body entirely naked. One would think that some skin disease
-had bereft them of their last hair. They are called Turkish dogs.
-
-“The size is not less variable. The Newfoundland dog is a majestic
-animal, as large as a calf; and then you will see a curly lap-dog, good
-for sleeping on drawing-room cushions, so tiny a creature that it could
-go into its master’s pocket. Between these two extremes there are all
-degrees.
-
-“If we enter on the details of shape, what diversity, again, do we
-find! Here the ear is small and stands up in a point; there it is large
-and covers the whole of the temple, and hangs down low enough to dip
-into the porringer out of which the animal eats. One, active in the
-chase, carries its slender body on long legs; another, apt at
-insinuating itself into the fox’s narrow hole or the rabbit’s burrow,
-trots on stubby members and almost touches the ground with its stomach.
-In this one the muzzle is gracefully tapered, made for caresses; in
-that, it is shortened into a brutal snout, adapted to warfare. Then
-there are some whose knotty and twisted legs seem crippled from birth;
-and there are others whose nose, black as coal, has the two nostrils
-separated by a deep trench.”
-
-“Those dogs look as if they had a double nose,” Louis remarked. “They
-are said to have a keener scent than the others.”
-
-“I don’t know how far the split nose may indicate keenness of scent.
-Let us go on and take a rapid glance at the principal breeds of dogs.
-
-“Let us first mention the mastiff, vigilant guardian of the farm-house
-and courageous protector of the flock. It is a robust, bold animal,
-tolerably large, with short hair on the back, longer under the belly
-and on the tail. It has a long head, flat forehead, ears erect at the
-base and drooping at the tip, strong legs, and vigorous jaws. White,
-black, gray, brown are the colors of its coat. The mastiff has rustic
-manners, scent far from keen, intelligence little developed. It is
-found fault with for not being very docile and not lavishing its
-caresses. Is the charge well founded? When one leads a rude life in
-mountain pastures, often at close quarters with wolves, can one possess
-the pretty, endearing ways of the dog reared in idleness? Is not a
-severe manner the necessary condition of the grave duties to be
-performed? The mastiff has the qualities of its lot in life, and it has
-them to such a degree that it is not always of the same opinion as its
-master, knowing better than he what must be done to protect the flock.
-Let a wolf appear, and without considering whether it is the stronger
-or weaker, the brave dog will throw itself on the beast and seize it by
-the nape of the neck, even at the risk of perishing in the battle. The
-mastiff does not weigh the danger; it leaps to the call of duty—a noble
-quality, and one that has given rise to the likening of an energetic
-and resolute person to a good mastiff.”
-
-“This wolf-strangler,” said Emile, “has my highest esteem, although he
-is not clever at offering the paw and playing dead.”
-
-“You will have no less esteem for the shepherd dog. It is of medium
-size, generally black, with long hair all over the body except on the
-muzzle. It has short, erect ears, tail horizontal or drooping. You know
-with what a swagger most dogs carry their tail over their back, curved
-like a trumpet. With them that is a sign of high satisfaction. If they
-are anxious, fear some misadventure, they lower it and carry it between
-their legs. The shepherd dog disdains this manner of erecting and
-curving the tail; he carries his modestly on a line with the body and
-keeps it more or less inclined according to the ideas with which he is
-preoccupied. That is the behavior of those wild animals most akin to
-the dog, such as the wolf and nearly all kinds of jackal: none of them
-curves the tail like a plume, but all carry it drooping. How does it
-happen that the smallest pug twists its tail into a corkscrew and bears
-it aloft with a pride bordering on insolence, while the shepherd dog
-holds his in the humble position adopted by the jackal and the wolf?
-This too, apparently, is a survival of old customs. Less changed in
-primitive characteristics than other species, the shepherd dog has
-retained from its wild ancestors the drooping carriage of the tail and
-the erect bearing of the ears.
-
-“The mastiff is the protector of the flock, the shepherd dog its
-conductor. The former is endowed with brute strength, vigorous body,
-and powerful jaws, but is not distinguished for intellectual gifts.
-Notice in passing, my friends, that strength of body and strength of
-mind seldom go together. A herculean athlete, exhibiting his talents in
-public on fairday, will break a stone with his fist, lift an anvil and
-hold it out at arm’s length, but would be incapable of putting two
-ideas together in his small brain. It is about the same with the
-mastiff: he boldly chases the wolves, but has none of the qualities of
-mind necessary for guiding the flock.
-
-“This delicate function, calling for a high degree of intelligence,
-falls to the shepherd dog. While the master rests in the shade or
-amuses himself playing on his box-tree flute, the dog, posted on a
-neighboring rise, keeps the flock under his eye and watches that none
-wander beyond the limits of the pasture. He knows that on this side
-grows a field of clover where browsing is expressly forbidden. If some
-sheep goes near, he runs up and with harmless snappings turns the
-animal back to the allotted place. He knows that the rural guard would
-prosecute with all the rigors of the law if the flock should stray to
-the other side, newly planted with young oats. They must not attempt
-it; if they do, he comes threatening and insists upon a hasty retreat.
-Are the scattered sheep to be gathered together? On a sign from his
-master he is off. He makes the circuit of the flock, barking here,
-worrying there, and drives before him, from the circumference to the
-center, the straying throng, which in a few moments becomes a compact
-group. His mission ended, he returns to the shepherd for fresh orders—a
-word, a gesture, a simple look.
-
-“I should like above all things to have you see him on duty when the
-flock is on the road, going to market or changing pastures. He walks
-behind, absorbed in his grave duties. Dogs from the neighboring farms
-come to meet him, and they pay him the polite attentions customary at
-the meeting of comrades. ‘Go away,’ he seems to say to them; ‘you see
-that I have no time to exchange civilities with you.’ And without
-glancing at them he continues his watchful following of the flock. It
-is wise of him, for already some sheep have stopped to crop the grass
-at the side of the road. To make them rejoin the flock takes but a
-minute. At this spot the hedge is open, and through the gap a part of
-the flock reaches a field of green wheat. To follow these undisciplined
-ones by the same breach would betray a lack of skill; the sheep, driven
-from behind, would only stray still farther into the forbidden field.
-But the wily keeper will not commit this fault; he makes a rapid
-detour, jumps over the hedge as best he can, and presents himself
-suddenly in front of the flock, which hastily retreats by the way it
-came, not without leaving some tufts of wool on the bushes.
-
-“Now the flock meets another. A mixing up, a confusion of mine and
-thine, must be prevented. The dog thoroughly understands the gravity of
-the situation. Along the flanks of the two bleating flocks he maneuvers
-busily, running from one end to the other, back and forth, to check at
-the outset any attempt at desertion from one to the other flock.”
-
-“Then,” said Emile, “he knows his sheep, every single one of them, to
-be able thus to distinguish which belong to him and which do not.”
-
-“One would almost say so, such discernment does he show.
-
-“Scarcely is this difficulty overcome when another presents itself.
-Here, right and left, the road has no fences; access to the fields is
-free on both sides. The temptation to the flock is great, for here and
-there most inviting greensward appears. The dog redoubles its activity.
-Let us go to the left. Well and good; everything is in proper train.
-Now to the right. Ha, you down there! Will you please go on without
-stopping to crop the young grass? That is well. Now to the rear. What
-is that loiterer doing there? Back to the flock, quick, dawdler!
-Perhaps something new has happened on the left; let us go and see. And
-without a moment’s relaxation the indefatigable dog goes first to one
-side, then to the other, then to the rear of the flock to hurry up the
-laggards and keep the intractable ones in the right path. If some, more
-headstrong, turn a deaf ear to his advice and scatter, he is after them
-in a moment, bringing them back by buffeting their shins with his
-muzzle.”
-
-“And by giving them a taste of his teeth too?” asked Jules.
-
-“No, my friend; a well-trained shepherd dog does not use his teeth,
-which would wound the animal; a threat must suffice to bring his sheep
-to order. To teach him this moderation, it is necessary to take him
-quite young and exercise a great deal of perseverance, with caresses,
-dainties, and, if need be, punishment; above all, he must be brought up
-in the company of a comrade already very expert in the business, since
-example is the best of teachers. The first time he is sent after the
-sheep he is closely watched, and if he shows a disposition to bite he
-is severely corrected. The best shepherd dogs come to us from Brie, a
-part of old Champagne. From this country is taken the name generally
-used for the guardian of the flock. Other dogs are called Medor,
-Sultan, Azor; he is called Labrie.”
-
-“I understand,” Emile nodded. “Labrie; that is to say, the dog of la
-Brie.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXI
-
-THE CHIEF BREEDS OF DOGS (Continued)
-
-
-“Let us continue our survey of the principal canine breeds. In size and
-strength the Dane approaches the mastiff, but is easily distinguished
-from it by its coat, which is generally white, with numerous round
-black spots. It is a magnificent dog, not very common, the guardian of
-fine houses, the friend of horses, and especially fond of running and
-barking before its master’s carriage.”
-
-“Is that all it knows how to do?” Emile inquired.
-
-“Pretty nearly.”
-
-“Then I’d rather have Labrie.”
-
-“I too. With its modest appearance and ill-kempt coat the shepherd dog
-has an intelligence and usefulness incomparably superior to the Dane’s,
-lordly creature though the latter is with its royally bespangled coat
-like that of the tiger and panther. Never judge either people or dogs
-by their appearance.
-
-“The harrier is endowed with a more tapering head, a longer muzzle,
-than any other breed. Its ears are half-drooping and point backward,
-its chest narrow, abdomen arched as if emaciated, legs long and
-slender, tail also long and slender, and its entire form distinguished
-by the same slenderness. It is the fleetest of all dogs. It routs out
-the hare in hunting; hence its name.”
-
-“Hare and harrier are indeed rather similar in spelling,” observed
-Jules.
-
-“Its color, less mixed than in the other breeds, is generally uniform,
-sometimes tawny, sometimes black, sometimes gray or even white. Some
-harriers have short hair, others long; in fact, there are some that are
-quite hairless like the Turkish dog. This dog is not very intelligent
-and shows no peculiar attachment to its master, but will fawn upon
-anybody. Its scent is imperfect, though its eyesight is excellent, and
-that is what guides it in the chase, while other dogs are guided by the
-scent.
-
-“The spaniel owes the name it bears to its Spanish origin. This
-beautiful dog is characterized by its slender, moderately long head; by
-its long, wavy hair, which is particularly abundant on the ears, which
-are drooping and silky, and on the tail, which forms a tuft or plume.
-No dog has a more amiable and gentle aspect. Intelligence and
-attachment to its master can be read in its eyes. Of all dogs it is the
-one your Uncle Paul would choose by preference as a friend. To this
-worth in respect to moral qualities add this other virtue, that the
-spaniel is an expert hunter. In this breed are found dogs with the
-split or double nose; but this peculiarity does not seem to add to
-their keenness of scent.
-
-“The barbet, otherwise water spaniel or sheep dog, is another of your
-Uncle Paul’s favorites on account of its exceptional intelligence, its
-gentle disposition, and its unequaled faithfulness. Who among you does
-not know the barbet with its big round head, full of good will, its
-large drooping ears, short legs, squat body, long, fine and curly hair,
-almost like wool, which has given it the name of sheep dog? When
-half-shorn, as it is in the summer, it is still more comely. The hind
-quarters are naked and show the rosy skin; the fore part of the body is
-covered with a thick mane as white as cotton wool. A coquettish tuft
-finishes off the tail, elegant ruffles adorn the legs, the muzzle bears
-a mustache and small beard, which latter perhaps accounts for its name
-of barbet.
-
-“Sheep—let us call it thus, as it is generally called—Sheep is a past
-master in accomplishments. He plays dead, offers the paw, jumps over an
-extended cane, stands up with a piece of sugar on his nose, and goes
-through his drill with a gun and with a paper cap set swaggeringly over
-one ear. But those are the least of his talents. Sheep is the clever
-one of the family. With careful education it is possible to cram this
-dog’s excellent noddle with the most astonishing things. I have known
-some, my children, that could tell the time by their master’s watch
-without a mistake.”
-
-“They could tell the time!” cried Jules incredulously. “You are
-jesting, Uncle.”
-
-“No, my friend, I am not jesting. The watch was shown to the dog, who
-looked at it attentively, seemed to make a calculation in his mind,
-then barked just as many times as the hand marked hours.”
-
-“That is capital, I declare!”
-
-“But there is still better coming. I know of a barbet that plays
-dominos with its master, and the master does not always win, either. As
-such talents are exercised by bread-winning barbets for those who show
-them off, I am inclined to believe that the dog’s intelligence is aided
-in the game by some signs from the master that pass unperceived by the
-spectators. No matter: there is enough to confound our poor reasoning
-powers in the calculating faculty of the animal as it counts its
-points, makes out those of its adversary, and as a result pushes the
-proper domino with the end of its nose.
-
-“To his intellectual faculties Sheep adds, in a high degree, the
-faculties of the heart, which are still more to be desired. Sheep is
-the blind man’s dog and guides him patiently, avoiding every obstacle,
-through the crowd by means of a string attached to the animal’s collar.
-When the master stands on the street-corner, begging pity with his
-shrill clarinet, Sheep, seated in a suppliant posture, holds the wooden
-bowl in his teeth and offers it to the passers-by. If the master dies,
-the dear master who shared the crust of bread with him like a brother,
-Sheep follows the coffin, lonely, sad, pitiful to see. He crouches on
-the mound that covers his master, pines there for a few days, and
-finally falls asleep there in the sleep of death. By what name should
-such a devoted creature be called? The blind call him Fido (the
-faithful one), and this name is in itself the finest of elegies.”
-
-“The barbet is a noble dog,” declared Jules.
-
-“In addition to all this it is a good hunting dog. As it willingly
-jumps into the water, is a skilful swimmer, and retrieves with
-indomitable zeal, it is much in demand for hunting water-fowl. When the
-master’s shot has brought down a wild duck, Sheep goes and fetches it
-from the middle of the pond. Sometimes a bitter wind is blowing and the
-water is frozen. Sheep does not care for that: he swims bravely through
-the broken ice, brings back the game, shakes his wet coat, and waits,
-shivering with cold, for the report of another shot before starting off
-again.”
-
-“He will certainly have earned the duck’s bones when the game comes on
-to the table,” said Emile. “To jump into the icy water like that! Poor
-fellow! Brrr! it makes the shivers run down one’s back only to think of
-it.”
-
-“Because of his exploits in duck-hunting this dog is known also as the
-water spaniel. But now let us pass on to another breed.
-
-“The hound is preëminently the dog of the chase. It has an extremely
-keen scent, which enables it to trace the route followed by the game
-simply from the odor of the emanations left by the passage of the
-animal. Guided by a faint odor that would be imperceptible to any other
-nose, it goes as straight to the hare as if it had had it constantly in
-sight. There is a wonderful sensitiveness in its nostrils which our
-sense of smell only distantly approaches. It is a sense superior in
-delicacy to sight, which distance and want of light place at a
-disadvantage, whereas distance and obscurity do not in the least impair
-the infallibility of the dog’s nose. Let the hare, warmed by the chase,
-merely graze with its back a tuft of bushes; that is enough and more
-than enough to put the hound on the track. To witness the unerring
-assurance of the pursuit, one might imagine that the hunted animal had
-traced in the air a trail visible to the dog.”
-
-“That sort of thing,” Emile interrupted, “may be seen any day without
-going into the woods with the hunter. The master, unknown to the dog,
-hides his handkerchief in a place hard to find; then he says to the
-animal, ‘Seek!’ The dog sniffs the air a moment to get a clue, and then
-runs to the handkerchief and brings it back in high glee. If I had such
-a nose nobody would play hide-and-seek with me: I should find my
-playmates too easily.”
-
-“Most dogs, some more, some less, have an astonishingly keen scent; but
-the hound is the best endowed in this respect, especially in all that
-concerns the chase, and so it is the hunter’s favorite. It has rather a
-large muzzle, strong head, vigorous and long body, tail uplifted, very
-short hair, generally white varied with large black or brown spots, and
-ears drooping and remarkably large.”
-
-“One could use them like a handkerchief to wipe the animal’s nose and
-eyes,” Emile interposed.
-
-“The beagle stands very low on its legs. Moreover, its legs, especially
-the fore legs, are contorted, crippled in appearance. One would say
-that the dog had undergone some violent strain from which it had not
-entirely recovered. Its head, its large and drooping ears, its short
-hair, are almost the same as the hound’s. The beagle is also an ardent
-hunter, the willing companion of him who, gun on shoulder, tramps over
-the rocky hills beloved by rabbits. With its short and twisted legs it
-trots rather than runs; but its slowness is more deadly to its victim
-than speed, for it allows the game to play and loiter in seeming
-security before it. Without suspecting the approach of the insidious
-enemy Jack Rabbit gambols and curls his mustache, and already the
-beagle is face to face with him, transfixing him with sudden terror.
-The shot is fired: all is over with Jack, who leaps into the air and
-falls back inert on the wild thyme.”
-
-“Poor Jack, so treacherously surprised! Now the hound does at least
-announce itself and let the rabbit scamper away as quick as it can. It
-is a contest of speed between the two. But the dumpy beagle creeps
-through the bushes and pops out all of a sudden.”
-
-“The beagle has not its equal for routing out the fox from its hole.
-Its gait, which is almost a crawl, enables it to penetrate the farthest
-corners of the fox’s abode. If it finds the malodorous animal there, it
-gives voice and holds the place with tooth and nail while allowing the
-hunters time to break into the fox-hole and capture the
-chicken-stealer.
-
-“The wolf-dog is the teamster’s favorite. A thousand times you have
-seen it, petulant and wrathful, running back and forth on the top of a
-loaded wagon and barking from the top of this fortress at the children
-teasing it below. It is superb in its anger, with its little leonine
-mane, its plumy tail tightly rolled in a corkscrew, and its pretty red
-collar with bells and fox-hair fringe. It has erect, pointed ears like
-the shepherd dog’s, slender muzzle, hair short on the head and paws,
-long and silky on the rest of the body. No dog knows better how to curl
-its tail and hold it proudly.”
-
-“Is that all it knows how to do?” asked Louis.
-
-“The wolf-dog is too intelligent not to have other merit than its
-pretty ways. Loubet (that is commonly its name) knows, if need be, how
-to turn the spit by means of a revolving drum in which it jumps
-continually, as does the squirrel in its rotary cage. If it has the
-companionship of a good shepherd dog, it easily learns the latter’s
-calling and becomes a pretty good flock-tender.”
-
-“That is better than raging on the top of a wagon and barking at the
-passers-by,” was Louis’s comment.
-
-“I do not know,” resumed Uncle Paul, “a more repulsive, brutal
-physiognomy than that of the bulldog. Look at its head, massive and
-short, with thick muzzle and flat nose, sometimes split; its heavy
-upper lip hanging down on each side and dripping with saliva, while the
-front teeth are exposed to view; its small eyes, with their hard
-expression; its ears torn by bites or made uglier by cropping;—think of
-all these marks of a brutal nature and tell me for what sort of
-occupation the bulldog is properly fitted.”
-
-“Its occupation,” answered Jules, “is read in its gross physiognomy:
-the bulldog is made for fighting.”
-
-“Yes, my friend; for fighting and nothing else. Let no one ask it to
-watch over a flock, accompany the hunter, retrieve the fallen game, or
-even turn the spit; its dull intelligence does not go so far as that.
-Its one gift is the gift of the jaw that snaps and does not let go; its
-one passion, the frenzy of combat. When its teeth have once fastened
-themselves in an adversary’s flesh, do not expect them to loosen their
-hold: a vice is not more tenacious in its grip. Calls, threats, blows,
-nothing avails to separate two bulldogs fighting each other; it is
-necessary to seize them and bite them hard on the end of the tail. The
-sharp pain of the bite can alone recall them from the fury of combat.”
-
-“I wouldn’t undertake the operation; the animal might turn against the
-one trying to make it let go.”
-
-“For the master there is no danger, as the bulldog is strongly attached
-to him. Boldness, strength, and indomitable tenacity in battle make
-this dog an efficient protector such as it is well to have at one’s
-side in a rough encounter. To leave the enemy as little hold as
-possible, it is the custom to crop the dog’s tail and ears;
-furthermore, the neck is protected with a collar studded with iron
-points.
-
-“This pugnacious breed is especially in favor in England, and it is
-from the English word dog that we French take our word dogue, in the
-sense of bulldog.”
-
-“Then dogue means dog?” asked Emile.
-
-“Nothing else. From the same word comes the diminutive doguin
-(pug-dog), by which we designate that little growling, scatter-brained
-poltroon, glutton and good-for-nothing, better known to you under the
-name of carlin (pug). Like the bulldog, it has a round head, short and
-flat-nosed muzzle, and hanging lip; and up to a certain point it has
-also the bulldog character, which it shows by a noisy rage, not having
-the size or strength necessary for anything further.”
-
-“That’s the funny little dog that barks at me in the doorway and
-immediately runs in if I pretend to go after it.”
-
-“The Turkish dog is another useless animal. Its size is that of the
-pug. It is remarkable for its almost naked skin, oily-looking, black,
-or dark flesh-color, and spotted with brown in large splashes. It has
-little intelligence and no attachment to its master. Its singular
-nakedness, which in our climate makes it shiver with cold a good part
-of the year, is its only merit, if it be a merit. I should rather call
-it a very disagreeable infirmity. Those who take pleasure in raising
-these poor animals clothe them in winter with a cloth coat.”
-
-“A dog that needed a tailor to furnish it with a winter costume would
-never do for me,” declared Emile. “I’d much rather have Medor, the
-spaniel, and Sheep, the barbet. They don’t shiver when it snows, and
-they are good friends, too.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXII
-
-THE VARIOUS USES OF DOGS
-
-
-“To guard the flock, drive away the wolf, discover game—those are the
-dog’s great functions; but an intelligent dog can learn to do a
-thousand other things. I have just shown you Sheep leading the blind
-and Loubet turning the spit. Traits abound in which the most varied
-aptitudes are revealed. For example, who has not seen or at least heard
-of the errand dog faithfully performing its appointed tasks? It
-receives a basket containing a purse and a slip of paper on which are
-written the articles desired. It may be it is to fetch tobacco for the
-master or get the day’s provisions from the butcher. The order
-understood, the animal sets out, basket between its teeth. It reaches
-the butcher’s door quickly, scratches for it to be opened, puts down
-the basket, takes out the purse, presents it, and waits until served.
-Sometimes the return is attended with difficulties. Comrades are met
-with; attracted by the smell, they desire to investigate the basket’s
-contents. ‘If you would only consent to it,’ they say, ‘what a splendid
-opportunity! We would divide together.’ But, without slowing up, the
-errand dog raises its lips a little, shows its teeth, and growls:
-‘Don’t bother me, you good-for-nothings! You see plainly enough this is
-for my master.’ And it gravely continues on its way, fully prepared to
-make things lively for the miscreant that should presume to poke its
-nose into the basket. Thanks to its haughty bearing, the provisions
-reach home without further adventure.”
-
-“The dog must be very well drilled in its duty,” commented Louis, “not
-only to resist temptation like that, but also to refuse to listen to
-the evil counsels of its comrades.”
-
-“And it never occurs to it to stop and have a feast with its friends
-when it is carrying a pound of tender cutlets?” queried Jules.
-
-“Never, for these delicate commissions are confided only to dogs whose
-temperance has been proved.”
-
-“The fable,” Jules remarked, “says somewhere:
-
-
- “Strange thing, indeed: to dogs is temperance taught,
- Which man, the teacher, ever fails to learn.”
-
-
-“Ah, yes, my friend; this beautiful virtue of temperance is hard enough
-for men to acquire. I know a little boy, now, that was sent one day to
-a friend’s house with a basket of figs or pears, and he couldn’t help
-tasting the fruit on the way, under the pretense of seeing whether it
-was perfectly ripe.”
-
-Here Emile lowered his head with a confused air and scratched his nose,
-apparently recalling some past misdeed of this sort on his part. But
-his uncle appeared not to notice him and continued thus:
-
-“Now let us talk about the truffle-hunting dog. To any of you that may
-not know it already, I will first say that the truffle is a sort of
-mushroom always growing beneath the soil, more or less deep, never in
-the open air. In shape it is quite different from ordinary mushrooms.
-It is round and plump, varying in size from that of a walnut to that of
-a man’s fist, has a wrinkled surface, and its flesh is black, marbled
-with white. The truffle is the best liked of mushrooms, especially on
-account of its perfume.
-
-“To discover it under the ground, sometimes several feet deep, sight is
-no guide, for nothing above reveals the presence of the precious
-tubercle. Scent alone will do the work. But however pronounced the
-aroma of the truffle may be, it is not strong enough for us to perceive
-it through a thick layer of earth; we must have recourse to the scent
-of an animal much better endowed in this respect than we. The aid
-invoked in these circumstances is frequently the pig, itself very fond
-of truffles and quick to discover them, guided merely by their odor. At
-the beginning of winter, accordingly, the season of this mushroom’s
-maturity, the pig is taken into the woods. Attracted by the odor that
-exhales from the ground, the animal digs with its snout wherever the
-truffles are concealed. But if allowed to finish its work, it would
-reach the tubercle, which would immediately disappear in its gluttonous
-maw. So the animal is drawn off at the right moment, while as a
-recompense and to encourage it in this good work it has a chestnut or
-an acorn thrown to it in place of the mushroom, and then the digging is
-finished with a small spade. This truffle-hunting requires, as you see,
-constant watchfulness, since the pig might, in an unguarded moment,
-unearth the truffle and straightway gobble it up. A grunt of
-satisfaction might announce the finding of the edible morsel, but it
-would be too late: the gluttonous beast would already have devoured the
-tidbit.
-
-“Hence the dog is preferred to the pig, being more active than the
-latter, more docile, of keener scent, and seeking the truffles only for
-its master, with no selfish motive of its own. It is marvelous to see
-it at work. Nose to the earth, the better to catch the faint emanation
-from underground, it systematically explores the places that seem to it
-the most promising, such as copses of young oaks and thickets of
-brushwood. It scents something. Good! It is a truffle. With much
-tail-wagging in evidence of its joy the dog burrows a little with its
-paw to indicate the place. Man continues the digging with an iron tool.
-But the truffle is not always unearthed at the first attempt; the
-search involves uncertainties and the following of false leads. ‘Let me
-look into this a little closer,’ says the dog to itself. And it pokes
-its muzzle into the very bottom of the hole, with sniffings that powder
-its nose with earth. ‘It is this way, master, to the left; dig again.’
-The man follows this advice and resumes operations; but no sign of a
-truffle. Fresh sniffings at the bottom of the hole. ‘On the honor of a
-dog, the truffle is there, and a fine one. This way, master, a little
-more to the left.’ At last the truffle is found, one of the largest of
-the gathering, and as a reward the dog gets a crust of bread.
-
-“The pig hunts for truffles with no previous education, since it is its
-nature to burrow in the soil for the tubercles and roots on which it
-feeds; but the dog has to be taught the business so foreign to its own
-habits. The first step is to familiarize it with the savor of the
-truffle, which is done by making it eat a truffle omelet.”
-
-“A truffle omelet!” exclaimed Emile. “That’s a dish much to be
-preferred to a bone.”
-
-“But not in the dog’s opinion,” rejoined his uncle. “Without showing
-any enthusiasm for this food that is so new to it, the dog accepts it
-at first partly as an act of obedience, then begins to like it, and
-finally would ask nothing better than to continue the diet for a long
-time. But the course of education in this dainty is of short duration,
-ending as soon as the odor to be remembered becomes familiar to the
-dog. Then a truffle is hidden in the ground, at first not very deep,
-to-morrow a little deeper, and the dog is trained in finding it. A
-caress, a piece of bread, are its recompense each time it does well.
-Such lessons, appropriately varied and repeated, at last produce the
-trained truffle-hunter, and the animal is then taken, from day to day,
-into the woods to perfect itself in its calling by actual practice. Of
-course this difficult work is the monopoly of dogs having the highest
-degree of intelligence, notably the water-spaniel.”
-
-“That’s the one sure to be called upon wherever unusual ability is
-needed,” Jules observed.
-
-“We have just seen the dog rival the pig, even surpass it, in the art
-of unearthing the truffle. Now I will show him to you taking the
-donkey’s place as a draft animal. An enormous dog harnessed to a light
-cart is not a rare sight in towns, where butchers especially make use
-of this singular equipage for the transport of their meat. But as I
-have something much more interesting to tell you I will not linger over
-this example. There is a country where the dog is the only draft
-animal, a country where it takes the horse’s place for carrying the
-master on long journeys. That country is Greenland.”
-
-“Greenland is where they heat water in a leather bag by throwing in
-red-hot stones?” Jules interposed.
-
-“And where they lick the piece of meat chosen for the distinguished
-guest?” added Emile.
-
-“Yes, Greenland is the country.”
-
-“It must be a sorry sort of country.”
-
-“More so than you could imagine. In Greenland, as everywhere else near
-the Pole, winter with its snows and ice lasts two thirds of the year,
-and the cold is intense. Navigators who have passed the winter in that
-bitter climate tell us that wine, beer, and other fermented liquors
-turn to solid ice in their casks; that a glass of water thrown into the
-air falls in flakes of snow; that the breath from the lungs
-crystallizes at the opening of the nostrils into needles of rime; and
-that the beard, stuck to the clothing by a coating of ice, cannot be
-detached except with scissors. For whole months at a time the sun is
-not once seen above the horizon and there is no difference between day
-and night; or rather, a permanent night reigns, the same at midday as
-at midnight. However, when the weather is clear, the darkness is not
-complete: the light of the moon and stars, augmented by the whiteness
-of the snow, produces a sort of wan twilight, sufficient for seeing.
-
-“Squat and under-sized, the inhabitant of these rigorous climes, the
-Eskimo, divides his time between hunting and fishing. The first
-furnishes him with skins for garments, the second with food. Dried
-fish, stored up in a half-rotten condition, and rancid whale-oil,
-viands repugnant to us, are the dainties familiar to his famished
-stomach. He depends also on his fishing for fuel to feed his lamp, this
-fuel being the fat of the seal, and for materials with which to make
-his sled, which is fashioned out of large fishbones. Wood, in short, is
-unknown there, no tree, however hardy, being able to withstand the
-rigors of winter. Willows and birches, dwarfed to the size of mere
-shrubs trailing on the ground, alone venture to the northern
-extremities of Lapland, where the growing of barley, the hardiest of
-cultivated plants, ceases. Nearer the Pole all woody vegetation ceases,
-and in summer only a few rare tufts of grass and moss are to be seen
-ripening their seeds hastily in the sheltered hollows of rocks. Still
-farther north the snow and ice cannot even melt entirely in summer, the
-ground is never visible, and no vegetation at all is possible.”
-
-“And there are people who give the dear name of home to those terrible
-countries?” asked Jules.
-
-“There are people, the Eskimos, who inhabit them the year round, in
-winter living in snow-huts, in summer under tents of sealskin.”
-
-“They build houses of snow!” This from Emile.
-
-“Not exactly houses like ours, but huts indeed that afford very good
-shelter. Regular slabs of snow are cut and piled one on another in a
-circular wall capped by a dome of the same material. A very low
-entrance, closed with skins, is left facing the south. To get daylight,
-they cut a round opening in the top of the dome, and fill it with a
-sheet of ice instead of a pane of glass. Finally, inside, all around
-the wall, a bench of snow is built, and it is covered with gravel,
-heather, and reindeer-skins. This bench is the sleeping-place for the
-family, the skins are the mattress, and the snow is the straw. In these
-dwellings there is never any fire: wood is wanting and, besides, with
-fire the dwelling would melt and come dripping down like rain on the
-inmates.”
-
-“That’s so,” said Emile. “Then where do they make the fire to heat the
-stones when they want hot water?”
-
-“They do this outside, in the open air.”
-
-“And with what, if there isn’t any wood in the country?”
-
-“With slices of whale’s fat and fishbones.”
-
-“They must freeze in those snow huts with no place for lighting a
-fire?”
-
-“No, for a moss wick fed with seal oil burns continually in a little
-earthen pot to melt snow and give drinking-water. The small amount of
-heat thrown out suffices to maintain an endurable temperature in the
-dwelling, thanks to the thickness of the snow walls.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXIII
-
-THE ESKIMO DOG
-
-
-“What I have just told you will make it plain enough that no domestic
-animal dependent on vegetable food can be kept in that country. Where
-could one find a supply of forage for the ox, horse, or even donkey,
-when the ground is covered with a thick layer of snow the greater part
-of the year, and when during the three or four months of summer all the
-verdure consists of meager greensward where a sheep would hardly find
-enough herbage to browse? Besides, these animals would succumb to the
-severity of the winter. There is but one species of this sort that can
-live in these desolate regions, and that is the reindeer, which is
-about as large as the stag, but more robust and more thick-set. Its
-horns, or antlers, are divided each into two branches, the shorter one
-pointing forward, the other, the longer, pointing backward, and both
-ending in enlargements that spread out somewhat like the palm and
-fingers of an open hand.”
-
-“According to your description,” observed Louis, “the reindeer must be
-a superb animal and must need plenty of food. Where does it find
-pasturage when everything is covered with snow?”
-
-“If it needed the forage to which our cattle are accustomed, no doubt
-it would starve to death the first winter; but it is content with a
-kind of food that none of our animals would touch. It is a lichen,
-white in color and divided into a multitude of branches, close together
-and presenting the appearance of a little bush a few inches high. It
-grows on the ground, which it entirely covers for immense stretches.
-During the winter the reindeer scratch the snow with their fore hoofs
-and uncover the coarse plant, softened by moisture; and this plant they
-browse. Thus it is that interminable fields of snow, the desolate
-abodes of famine, supply nevertheless sufficient pasturage for these
-animals. This lichen, last vegetable resource of the extreme north, is
-called reindeer moss, and is found everywhere, in the most arid lands,
-between the poles and the equator. Among the underbrush of our most
-barren hills you will find it in abundance, fresh and supple in winter,
-dried up and crackling under the feet in summer.”
-
-“The reindeer ought to live in our country,” Jules remarked, “since
-there is lichen for it to feed on.”
-
-“The climate is much too warm for it. Hardly would it be able to endure
-the mildness of our winters; and how about the heat of our summers? It
-needs the snows and the harsh climate of the polar regions, away from
-which it rapidly dies out.
-
-“In Lapland the reindeer is a domestic animal. There it fills the place
-of our cattle and serves at one and the same time as cow, sheep, and
-horse. The Laplander lives on reindeer milk and its products, and on
-the animal’s flesh. He clothes himself with its warm fur, and makes a
-very soft leather out of its skin. When the ground is covered with
-snow, he harnesses the reindeer to his sled and travels as many as
-thirty leagues a day, his swift equipage with its broad runners gliding
-over the snow and hardly leaving a trace behind.
-
-“The reindeer is not rare in Greenland, but there it lives in the wild
-state, for the Eskimo, much less civilized than the Laplander, has not
-yet learned how to win it to his uses and accustom it to domestic life.
-It runs at large and merely furnishes the game on which the
-Greenlanders count to vary somewhat their diet of fish. For domestic
-animals, then, what is there left to the Eskimo, since the only species
-able to live in that land of snow huts, the reindeer, is, in that
-desolate region, a wild animal approached by the hunter only with ruse
-and caution? There remains the dog, the faithful companion which,
-thanks to its kind of food, can accompany man everywhere, even on his
-most daring expeditions toward one or other of the poles. Where the
-reindeer would have to pause, lichen failing or being covered with too
-thick a layer of snow, the dog continues to go forward, since for food
-it needs only a fishbone, and the neighboring sea furnishes fish in
-plenty. The dog is the Eskimo’s all, in the way of domestic animals.”
-
-“That all is very little,” said Jules.
-
-“Very little, certainly; but still without the dog the Eskimo could not
-live in his gloomy country. With the help of the dog he chases the wild
-reindeer, the flesh of which gives him food, and the skin furnishing
-for his hut; on the ice he attacks the white bear, whose fur will
-become a warm winter cloak; he makes himself master of the seal which
-will give him its intestines for ropes and its oily fat for fuel to
-feed his ever-burning lamp. In fact, the dog is to him not only a
-hunting companion, but also a draft animal able to transport him at a
-good rate of speed whithersoever he wishes to go.
-
-“The Eskimo dog is about the size of our shepherd dog, but more robust
-in build. It has upstanding ears, tail coiled in a circle, hair thick
-and woolly, as it should be to resist the atrocious cold of the country
-it inhabits. No domestic species leads a harder life. At long intervals
-a meat-bone or a large fishbone for food, and nothing more; no shelter
-except the hole it may dig for itself in the snow; cuffs much oftener
-than caresses; after the fatigues of the chase the still more
-exhausting labor of drawing the sled—such is its life of hardship.
-Harsh treatment and constant hunger are not conducive to gentleness of
-disposition. So the Eskimo dogs are quarrelsome among themselves, surly
-toward man, always ready to show their teeth, and especially disposed
-to attack their victuals with voracity. Nowhere in the world are there
-more audacious pillagers: so extreme are the pangs of hunger that no
-punishment avails to prevent their snapping up any morsel unguardedly
-left within their reach.”
-
-“Not the most docile sort of companion, I should say,” Jules remarked.
-
-“The women, who treat them more gently, feed them, and take care of
-them when they are little, can easily make them obey. Nearly always,
-even when these poor animals suffer most cruelly from hunger, the women
-succeed in getting them together to be harnessed to the sled.”
-
-“I should like, Uncle,” put in Emile, “before hearing the rest, to know
-just what an Eskimo sled is. I can’t imagine exactly what it is like.”
-
-“The sled, as its name indicates, is a kind of light vehicle without
-wheels, designed for dragging over the ice or snow where sliding is
-easy. The Eskimo sled is rudely built. Imagine two strips of wood
-curving upward at each end and placed side by side at a certain
-distance from each other. They are the chief pieces, which are to
-support all the rest and themselves glide on the snow. Between the two
-is constructed a framework of light transverse bars, and on this
-framework rises a sort of niche lined with furs, where the traveler
-squats. That is the Eskimo sled.
-
-“The two chief pieces, resembling long skates gliding over the hard
-snow, I said were of wood; but I hasten to add that generally they are
-made of other material, as wood is one of the rarest things in this
-country where there is not enough vegetation to furnish even a
-broomstick. All the wood in use is washed ashore by the sea, from far
-countries, at the time of heavy storms. So the Eskimo has not always at
-his disposal the two narrow strips necessary. He uses instead two long
-whalebones, chosen for their shape and curvature. If bones are lacking
-there remains one last resort. With the intestines of the seal or
-thongs of skin he ties large fish in two bundles, makes them of the
-desired shape, and exposes them to the frost, which hardens them like
-stone until summer comes again. Those are the two runners, the two
-chief pieces of the sled.”
-
-“What a queer country, where the people use bundles of frozen fish for
-runners!” Emile could not but exclaim.
-
-“But the runner has not yet played out its part. After it has slidden
-all winter over the snowy plain, it thaws out with the return of warm
-weather and the fish composing it are popped into the bag of boiling
-water to cook.”
-
-“The people eat them?”
-
-“Why, certainly, my friend; they eat the framework of the demolished
-sled.”
-
-“Once more, I say, if ever those people invite me to dinner I shall
-decline. I shouldn’t relish their licking the food to clean it, nor
-should I care for fish that had been dragged about for months, nobody
-knows where.”
-
-“Now that you know about the sled, let us speak of the team. The dog’s
-harness is composed of two thongs of reindeer skin, one going round the
-neck, the other round the breast, and both connected by a third thong
-passing between the fore legs. To this harness, near the shoulders, are
-attached two long leather straps which are fastened to the sled at the
-other end. The dog team numbers from twelve to fifteen. One dog, the
-most intelligent and with the keenest scent, goes along at the head of
-the pack; the others follow, several abreast, the novices nearest to
-the sled. Seated in the niche of his vehicle, one leg out this way, one
-the other, feet almost skimming the snow, the Eskimo drives his
-equipage with an enormously long whip, for this whip must be able to
-reach the farthest dog, seven or eight meters from the sled. But he
-refrains as much as possible from using it, since a lash from the whip
-is more likely to promote disorder than to increase the speed. The dog
-struck, not knowing whence the blow came, lays the blame on its
-neighbor and bites it; the latter passes the compliment along to
-another, which in turn hastens to worry the next; and in a moment,
-spreading through the pack, the rough-and-tumble fight becomes general.
-Then it is a task indeed to restore peace and get the broken or tangled
-harness straightened out.
-
-“Hence the whip is but rarely called into service to correct a too
-unruly dog, and it is chiefly with the voice that the driver guides his
-team. The leading dog is particularly attentive to the master’s word:
-he turns to the right, left, or goes straight ahead, increases or
-slackens speed, and the others govern themselves accordingly. Every
-time an order is given, the leader turns its head without stopping and
-looks at the master, as if to say, ‘I understand.’ If the route has
-been already traveled the driver has nothing to do: the leader follows
-the trail even when it is invisible to man. In black darkness, in the
-midst of violent snow-squalls, aided by its sense of smell and its
-astonishing sagacity, it continues to guide the rest of the team, and
-very seldom goes astray.
-
-“In a single day 150 kilometers are thus made. If fatigue calls a halt,
-the Eskimo builds himself a shelter with snow piled up for walls and a
-large slab of ice for roof. Here he disposes himself as best he can for
-sleeping, after a frugal lunch of salt fish or flesh, thawed by the
-heat of a lamp. On awakening, a signal is given and immediately all
-about the hut little mounds of snow move and shake themselves. They are
-the dog-team, which has slept outside, covered by the falling snow. The
-Eskimo doles out to them a meager pittance, which is instantly
-swallowed, and without delay he harnesses the sled to resume his
-journey in quest of the white bear or the reindeer on which he has set
-his heart.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXIV
-
-THE DOG OF MONTARGIS
-
-
-“The dog is much attached to its master; if it loses him it remembers
-him for a long time. I am going to give you an example so striking that
-it has been recorded in history.
-
-“In the year 1371 there lived at the court of King Charles V a
-nobleman, the Chevalier Macaire, who, envious of the favor one of his
-companions, Aubry de Montdidier, enjoyed with the king, one day came
-upon his rival by surprise, when the latter was accompanied only by his
-dog, in a deserted corner of the forest of Montargis. Finding the
-occasion opportune for gratifying his odious rancor, he suddenly threw
-himself upon Aubry, killed him, and buried his body in the forest. The
-ill deed accomplished, he returned to court, where he bore himself as
-if nothing out of the ordinary had occurred.”
-
-“Oh, the hateful wretch!” cried Jules.
-
-“In the meantime the dog couched on its master’s grave, where night and
-day it howled with grief. When the pangs of hunger pressed too hard it
-returned to Paris, scratched at the door of its master’s friends,
-hastily ate what was given it, and immediately went back to the wood to
-lie down again on the grave. Seeing it thus come and go alone, always
-oppressed with care and manifesting by doleful barks some deep grief,
-people followed it into the forest, watched its actions, and saw that
-it stopped on a mound of freshly turned earth, where its lamentations
-became still more plaintive.”
-
-“No doubt they dug and the crime was discovered?”
-
-“Struck with the fresh mound of earth and the dog’s howls at this spot,
-they dug and found the dead man, to whom a more honorable burial was
-then given; but there was nothing to make them suspect the author of
-the murder.”
-
-“And what became of the dog?” asked Emile.
-
-“After having thus apprized Aubry’s friends and relatives that its
-master had been miserably assassinated, there remained a more difficult
-task for it to accomplish; namely, to expose the murderer. A relative
-of the dead man had adopted the dog and was in the habit of taking the
-animal out with him when he went to walk. One day the dog chanced to
-spy the assassin, Macaire, in company with other gentlemen. To leap at
-his throat for the purpose of biting and strangling him, was the affair
-of an instant.”
-
-“Bravo! Good dog! Strangle the rascal!” cried Emile in great
-excitement.
-
-“You are going too fast, my friend,” his uncle remonstrated. “No one as
-yet suspected that Macaire was the author of the horrible crime. They
-draw off the dog, beat it, and drive it away. The animal keeps
-returning in a rage, and as it is not allowed to come near it
-struggles, barks from a distance, and directs its threats toward the
-quarter where Macaire has disappeared.
-
-“This performance is repeated again and again, and on each occasion the
-dog, perfectly gentle toward every other person, is seized with violent
-rage at the sight of the murderer and recommences its assaults. It is
-against Macaire alone that it nurses a grudge which neither threats nor
-blows can appease. Such is the creature’s fury that finally the query
-arises whether the dog may not be actuated by a desire to avenge the
-death of its first master.”
-
-“Ha! now we are coming to it. Suspicion is aroused.”
-
-“They speak to the king about the affair; they tell him that a nobleman
-of his court was found buried, victim of an unknown assassin; they
-further inform him that the dead man’s dog, with indomitable
-persistence, springs at the Chevalier Macaire every time it sees him.
-The king has the suspected person brought before him and orders him to
-remain hidden in the midst of a throng of other bystanders. Then the
-dog is brought in. Its sense of smell immediately warns it of the
-presence of the murderer. With its accustomed fury it spots its victim
-in the crowd and springs at him. As if reassured by the king’s
-presence, it attacks with more boldness than ever, and by its plaintive
-barks seems to ask that justice be done it. There is hasty
-intervention, without which Macaire would be devoured by the animal.”
-
-“And it would have served him right.”
-
-“Wait: punishment will come. The dog’s strange conduct, together with
-other suspicious circumstances, had made an impression on the king.
-Some days later Charles V had Macaire appear before him and pressed him
-by his questions to confess the truth. What foundation was there for
-the suspicions current in regard to him? How explain, if he were not
-guilty, the dog’s repeated attacks and furious barking at sight of him?
-Seized with the fear of a shameful punishment, Macaire obstinately
-denied the crime.
-
-“At this epoch, characterized by manners and customs little above
-barbarism, when the accuser affirmed and the accused denied, with no
-sufficient proof on either side, it was customary to decide the
-question by a mortal combat between the two. The one that succumbed was
-held to be in the wrong.”
-
-“But to be the weaker proves nothing against right,” objected Jules.
-“One might be a thousand times right and yet be beaten by one’s
-adversary.”
-
-“That is undeniably true, and I hope you will from day to day become
-more firmly convinced of this noble truth. In our lamentable age—you
-will learn this later, my friend—in our lamentable age it is a current
-maxim, a maxim of savagery, that might makes right! In the days of
-Charles V, rude as that period was, no one would have dared to say such
-a horrible thing; but nevertheless, under the influence of
-superstition, men really believed that the vanquished was in the wrong,
-because, they maintained, right can never succumb, upheld as it is by
-God. Therefore a judicial combat was called a judgment of God. Alas,
-alas, my friend, how far they were from sanity of mind! How far from it
-we ourselves are, with our duel, relic of ancient barbarism! What does
-a well-directed shot prove in favor of him who pulled the trigger?
-Nothing, unless it be that he is more adept in the use of firearms than
-his adversary, or that chance has been on his side. Thus it is,
-however, that men decide disputes involving our most precious
-possession, honor.
-
-“The king, then, ordered the affair to be brought to an end and the
-truth determined by a combat between the man and the dog. A large field
-was laid out with seats for the king, all his court, and a numerous
-company besides. In the middle of the field were the two champions—the
-man with a large and heavy stick, the dog with the weapons that nature
-had given it, and with nothing but a leaky cask for a refuge and a
-sally-port.”
-
-“This cask was to serve it as shelter against the blows of the stick?”
-asked Emile.
-
-“It was the citadel where, if the attack became too pressing, it could
-take refuge in order to escape the cudgel’s blows. But the brave animal
-did not once make use of it. As soon as it was let loose it rushed at
-Macaire. But the nobleman’s stick was big enough to fell his adversary
-with a single blow; so the dog began to run this way and that around
-the man to avoid the crushing descent of the club. Then, seizing its
-opportunity, with one bound it jumped at its enemy’s throat and gripped
-it so firmly as to throw Macaire over backward. Half strangled, he
-cried for pity and begged to be freed from the animal, promising to
-confess everything. The guards drew off the dog and, the judges
-approaching by royal command, Macaire confessed his crime to them.”
-
-“And the assassin got off with nothing but a bite from the dog?”
-
-“Macaire was hanged like the scoundrel that he was.”
-
-“That time, at least, might decided right,” Jules declared with much
-satisfaction.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXV
-
-HYDROPHOBIA [5]
-
-
-“Of all the ferocious animals that you know, at least by hearsay, which
-one would you most dread to meet?” asked Uncle Paul. Emile was the
-first to reply.
-
-“For my part,” said he, “if I went nutting in the woods I shouldn’t at
-all like to meet a wolf, even if I had a stout stick with me.”
-
-“If I should meet a wolf,” Jules declared, “I would just climb a tree
-and make fun of Mr. Wolf, for he doesn’t know how to climb. But I
-should be more afraid of a bear, for that can climb trees better than
-we, and it hugs a man till it stifles him.”
-
-“As for me,” said Louis, “the animal I should fear most would be the
-tiger; they say it is so ferocious. With a bound it springs on a man as
-the cat pounces on a mouse.”
-
-“The wolf is a coward,” Uncle Paul assured his hearers. “Just threaten
-it in a loud voice, throw a stone or two at it, or shake a stick, and
-you put it to flight. Nevertheless, if it were pressed with hunger, it
-would take courage and one might pass a very bad quarter of an hour in
-its company. The bear is more dangerous. With it, retreat up a tree is
-of no avail, and precipitous flight has not much chance of success, for
-the bear is very nimble. What a terrible fate to find oneself held
-tight in a horrible embrace, and to feel the beast’s warm breath on
-one’s face! With the tiger it would be worse. Let its claws once get
-hold of a man, let its jaws once close on him, and he is torn to
-pieces. There is nothing so terrible as its sudden attack and its
-bloodthirsty ferocity.”
-
-“That’s the animal most to be feared, as I said,” Louis declared, “if
-it were found in our country. But luckily there are no tigers here.”
-
-“We have no tigers in our woods,” assented Uncle Paul, “but we have in
-our very midst an animal that is still more formidable in certain
-circumstances. This terrible enemy that we are liable to encounter at
-any moment does not possess by a good deal the strength of the tiger or
-bear; most often it is not even so strong as the wolf; sometimes it is
-so feeble that a well-directed blow of the fist is enough to knock it
-down. Its nature is not sanguinary; its teeth and claws are not strong
-enough to frighten us.”
-
-“Well, then,” Emile demanded, “why is this enemy so much to be feared?”
-
-“Do not let this lack of strength reassure you. As for me, I shudder at
-the mere thought of the danger to which we are exposed. Against those
-other animals, however dangerous or strong they may be, defense is
-possible. With presence of mind and with weapons one may come out of
-the fight victorious; if one is injured by teeth or claws the wound may
-heal. But against this other creature presence of mind, skill, courage,
-weapons, help—all are useless; let it bite you only once, let the point
-of its tooth merely tear the skin so as to draw blood, making no more
-than a scratch, and it will suffice to endanger your very life. Better
-would it be to find yourself in the wolf’s jaws or the bear’s embrace.
-Vainly you get the upper hand and ward off the animal’s assaults,
-vainly you kill it: a tiny scratch, insignificant enough from any other
-animal, will in the near future cause your death, a horrible death,
-more atrocious than any other in the world. As a result of that tiny
-wound a day will come, and it will come soon, when, seized all at once
-with a furious madness, shaken by horrible convulsions, frothing with
-drivel, and not recognizing either relatives or friends, you will
-spring upon them like a ferocious beast, to bite them savagely and give
-them your disease. No hope of restoring you to health, no way to
-alleviate your sufferings; you must be left to die, an object of horror
-and pity.”
-
-“What is that formidable animal?” Jules inquired. “Are we really ever
-likely to have a tussle with it?”
-
-“We are daily exposed to this danger. No one is certain of not being
-attacked this very day, this very instant; for the terrible animal
-frequents our public places, wanders in our streets, makes our houses
-its home, and lives in close intimacy with us. In fact, it is no other
-than the dog.”
-
-“The dog, the most useful and most devoted of our servants!” exclaimed
-Jules incredulously.
-
-“Yes, the dog. In proportion as it merits our attachment under usual
-conditions, so does it become the object of our just fear when seized
-with a malady called hydrophobia.”
-
-“They say, and I’ve often heard it, that mad dogs are very dangerous,”
-remarked Louis. “How do they get this disease?”
-
-“Its origin is unknown. Without any discoverable cause, from no motive
-that we can discern, the dog goes mad; the malady is spontaneous; that
-is to say, it makes its appearance unheralded by symptoms. Any dog may
-be attacked, the contented pet in a fine house as well as the poor
-homeless waif that hunts for a scrap in the sweepings at the street
-corner. I must add, however, that the sufferings of hunger and thirst,
-with bad treatment, tend to promote the disease, stray dogs being more
-subject than others to spontaneous madness. Here we have a new and very
-weighty reason why we should take good care of our dogs. To let them
-suffer cruelly is to expose them to the inroads of a horrible ailment
-that may perhaps be our own destruction.
-
-“Spontaneous madness once developed in a dog, the malady, unless
-precautions are taken, is propagated in others with frightful rapidity.
-Ten dogs, a hundred dogs, can in a short time themselves become mad. An
-animal attacked with rabies is, in short, tormented with an
-irresistible desire to bite others. Wild-eyed, tail between its legs,
-hair erect, lip frothing, it springs with lowered head on the first dog
-it meets, bites it, and immediately springs at another, then another,
-as many as it comes across. Now, every dog bitten becomes itself mad in
-a few days, some sooner, some later, and propagates the evil in the
-same way unless energetic measures cut this scourge short.
-
-“The disease is communicated to man also by the bite. A mad dog bites
-animals and human beings without distinction; it springs furiously at
-passers-by, and even springs at its master, whom it no longer
-recognizes. If the tooth, moistened with saliva, pierces the skin so as
-to draw blood, it is all over with the victim: hydrophobia has been
-communicated.”
-
-“It is the same here, then, as with the viper’s venom?” asked Jules.
-
-“Exactly the same. From the mad dog’s mouth runs a deadly saliva, a
-real venom which, mingling with the blood through an open wound, causes
-madness at the end of a certain time. On unbroken skin this saliva has
-no effect; but on the slightest bleeding scratch it operates in its
-peculiarly terrible fashion. In short, like other venoms, the saliva of
-rabies, as it is called, must infiltrate into the blood in order to
-act.
-
-“This shows you that the bite is less dangerous if made through
-clothing, especially thick clothing. The fabric can wipe the dog’s
-teeth on the way and retain the venomous saliva; it can even arrest
-somewhat the action of the jaws and prevent the animal’s teeth from
-going in so far. If there is but a slight wound that fails to draw
-blood, the saliva has not penetrated and there is no danger.
-
-“The conditions necessary for the development of rabies, namely the
-mingling of the dog’s saliva with our blood and its introduction into
-our veins, should always be in our minds if we wish to avoid a danger
-that threatens us even in the midst of seeming security. It is to be
-noted that in the first stage of the disease the dog is more
-demonstrative in its affection than usual: the poor beast seems to wish
-once more to lavish its tokens of attachment on those it loves, before
-abandoning itself to the transports of fury that will soon be beyond
-its control. Let us suppose that at this moment you have a slight wound
-on your hand, and the dog comes, docile and fawning, and lovingly licks
-the little wound. Its tongue mixes the saliva with your blood; the
-terrible venom infiltrates into your veins. Fatal caress! Rabies and
-all its horrors perhaps will be the consequence. Take this as a
-warning: never allow a dog, however reassuring its demeanor may be, to
-lick you on a place where the skin is broken. No one can affirm with
-certainty that the atrocious malady is not already developing in the
-animal, and you might fall a victim to your excess of confidence.
-
-“Hydrophobia shows itself in man usually in from thirty to forty days
-after the bite. It begins with headache, deep depression, continued
-uneasiness, troubled sleep, and bad dreams; then come convulsions and
-delirium. The face expresses great terror; the lips turn blue and are
-covered with foam; the throat contracts so as to render swallowing
-impossible. The sight of liquids inspires the patient with
-insurmountable aversion, and a drop of water placed in the mouth would
-produce frightful strangulation. Then come fits of madness during which
-the patient struggles furiously to bite and rend the one who is taking
-care of him. The disease has changed him to a wild beast. At last death
-comes and puts an end to this horrible agony.”
-
-“Then there is no remedy for hydrophobia?” asked Jules.
-
-“Medicine as yet knows absolutely none. All it can do is to let the
-sufferer die—banishing forever the execrable notions that formerly
-prevailed, and perhaps still do at present. To get rid of the incurable
-and dangerous patient it was necessary, they said, to smother him
-between two mattresses. Whoever should to-day commit such a barbarous
-act would be pursued by justice and punished as a murderer.”
-
-“Formerly they smothered the patient between two mattresses, now they
-let him die—no great advance,” observed Louis.
-
-“Pardon, my friend; it is no small advance to have banished forever
-from the sick-bed the senseless brutalities of ignorance, pending the
-day, which will come, I hope, when science shall gain the upper hand of
-the terrible disease.
-
-“Hydrophobia, when it has once set in, cannot, I say, so far as we
-know, be cured; but at least, by means of certain precautions, we can
-anticipate it and prevent the mad dog’s bite from leading to fatal
-results. The saliva of rabies acts in poisoning the blood precisely as
-does the venom of dangerous serpents. The precautions to be taken are
-then, in both cases, about the same: the saliva must be prevented from
-entering the veins; it must be destroyed in the wound. To this end it
-is customary to bind the bitten part above the wound, so as to arrest
-the circulation; then the torn flesh is made to bleed and is afterward
-washed in order to remove as much as possible of the venomous humor;
-finally, and as soon as may be, the wound is cauterized with iron
-heated white-hot.”
-
-“Oh, what a frightful remedy!” cried Emile. “Is there no other?”
-
-“It is the only one, and it must be applied with the least delay
-possible, and boldly. Life is at stake. These precautions taken,
-especially the cauterization, one can feel some reassurance that the
-malady will not make its appearance. Of course the operation would
-succeed better in a doctor’s hands, which are more experienced than
-ours; but if his help cannot be got at once, let us proceed without
-him, for here promptitude offers the best chance of success.”
-
-“I shudder at the thought of that white-hot iron making the wound
-sizzle,” said Jules. “All the same I would submit to being burned in
-order to escape the most terrible of fates.”
-
-“If there’s no other way, I would submit, too,” Emile declared. “But
-still I say, plague take dogs for making us have to endure the hot iron
-if we wish to escape something worse. Can’t they keep these animals
-from going mad?”
-
-“To prevent all outbreaks of rabies is not in our power, but it rests
-with us to make mad dogs scarce enough not to cause us too much
-anxiety. When this malady threatens, notably in the heat of midsummer,
-police regulations require the muzzling of all dogs permitted to go
-from home. Furthermore, little poisoned balls are scattered in the
-street to get rid of stray dogs. To these measures of the police we
-ought to add our own watchfulness; we ought always to have an eye on
-our dogs, if we have any, for, living with us as they do, they will be
-the first to expose us to danger. It is most important, then, for us to
-know by what signs incipient rabies can be detected. That is what I am
-going to teach you according to the masters who have made a thorough
-study of this grave subject.
-
-“First of all, I will refute two erroneous assumptions that are widely
-held and that might become fatal by imparting a false security. It is
-generally believed that a mad dog is always in a state of fury. That
-this frenzied condition shows itself when the disease is at its height,
-is very true; but also nothing is more utterly false as to the first
-stages of the malady. Far from being seized with attacks of fury, the
-dog just beginning to be infected shows, on the contrary, an excess of
-affectionate feelings: by multiplied caresses it seems to beg of man
-some sort of help against the vague terrors with which it is tormented.
-Secondly, it is popularly maintained that a mad dog does not drink and
-manifests a great horror of water, and that no dog seen in the act of
-drinking can be mad. This notion is so deeply rooted in most minds
-that, to designate rabies there has been formed, from two Greek words,
-the special term, hydrophobia, signifying horror of water. Well, my
-friends, never forget this: no matter what the Greek term says, a mad
-dog drinks very well; it drinks greedily every time it has the chance,
-without manifesting any aversion whatever toward the water. Later, when
-the animal is near its end, the throat contracts and swallowing becomes
-impossible. Then, and not till then, the dog shuns drink with horror.
-Therefore, far from reassuring us, it is on the contrary an added cause
-for alarm when we see a dog becoming more affectionate than usual and
-drinking with unaccustomed avidity.
-
-“It is in restlessness and agitation without apparent cause that the
-first signs of the inroads of rabies manifest themselves. The dog
-cannot stay in one place, it goes without any object from one spot to
-another, and retires to a corner where it turns round without being
-able to find a position that suits it. Its look expresses gloom and
-sadness. It seems obsessed by a fixed idea from which the call of a
-loved voice may draw it for a moment; then it relapses into sadness.
-
-“Food is not yet refused. On the contrary, the dog pounces gluttonously
-on the food set before it; sometimes its depraved appetite is such that
-it even devours substances having no nutriment, such as wood, straw,
-and anything found in its way, even its own excrement. Water is drunk
-with the same avidity. As soon as this unreasonable agitation, this
-deep sadness, this excess of affection, and this depraved appetite show
-themselves, the dog should be suspected of rabies; prudence demands
-that it be chained and closely watched.
-
-“Suspicion becomes complete certainty if the animal from time to time
-utters a peculiar and quite characteristic cry, which is called the
-mad-dog howl. In the midst of one of these attacks of lugubrious
-sadness, all at once the dog springs with a bound at an imaginary
-enemy. Then, muzzle uplifted, it gives an ordinary bark that ends
-bruskly and peculiarly in a piercing howl. At this discordant sound one
-might be reminded of the manner in which roosters sometimes crow, at
-least so far as the extremely hoarse and cracked tone is concerned.”
-
-“A dog often howls for want of something else to do, when it is shut
-up,” remarked Louis. “That would not be a sign of madness?”
-
-“No, my friend. Ordinary howling denotes a passing feeling of gloom,
-ennui, fright; and this cry cannot be confounded with the veritable
-howl of rabies, the characteristics of which are very different. This
-latter begins with a perfect bark and suddenly passes into a sharp and
-prolonged howl comparable to the cock’s crow.
-
-“As long as the furious madness that will end the progress of the
-malady is not declared, the animal is harmless; but it is unnecessary,
-it would even be dangerous, to wait so long. If the peculiar howl of
-rabies is heard, doubt is no longer possible: the dog is unquestionably
-mad. For our safety and also to spare the poor animal the tortures
-awaiting it, the dog should be killed at once. In the animal’s interest
-as well as our own, it is a kind action.”
-
-“Poor dog!” murmured Jules. “The master gives it a last look of regret,
-and, with tears in his eyes, lodges a ball in its head.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXVI
-
-THE CAT
-
-
-“The cat entered our household long after the dog; nevertheless its
-domestication took place very early. The East, whence we received it,
-has possessed it from time immemorial. Ancient Egypt, the old land of
-the Pharaohs, has transmitted to us the most curious documents on this
-subject.
-
-“In that country, celebrated for its profound veneration for domestic
-animals, honors almost divine were paid to the ox, dog, cat, and many
-other creatures. Nearer the primitive ages than we, and still
-remembering the miseries from which the domestic animals had freed man,
-the Egyptians no doubt showed their gratitude by these honors, which
-seem to us to-day the height of superstition. The ox, turning up the
-farmer’s soil with the plow, was accorded the highest position. A
-magnificent white bull, called the bull Apis, was kept at the expense
-of the State in a sumptuous temple of granite and marble, and cared for
-by a retinue of attendants who approached it with reverence, wearing
-rich costumes of ceremony, swinging the censer, and, in short,
-observing all the forms of deep veneration.”
-
-“Just to change the straw and fill the rack with hay, they went censer
-in hand and with bent knees?” Emile asked with incredulity.
-
-“Yes, my friend.”
-
-“Then times are greatly changed for the ox. Nowadays the ox-tender lets
-the animal go disgracefully dirty with dung and lie on a miserly
-allowance of straw; and he isn’t at all sparing of the goad to quicken
-the ox’s pace.”
-
-“On great fête-days, when the bull Apis went out escorted by its
-retinue of servants, the crowd prostrated itself to the ground along
-the way, with foreheads in the dust. At its death, mourning was general
-throughout Egypt. An immense granite coffin, masterpiece of art and
-patience, the work of a thousand artisans, received the sacred remains,
-which were then placed in a sepulchral chamber hollowed out in the
-heart of a mountain and sumptuously adorned with the finest examples of
-sculpture and painting.”
-
-“And did other domestic animals receive like honors?” asked Jules.
-
-“All were honored, but none so signally as the ox. In regard to the
-cat, for instance, it was deemed sufficient to embalm it with aromatics
-after its death, swathe it in bands of fine linen, and place the body
-thus prepared in a chest of sweet-scented wood adorned with gildings,
-paintings, and inscriptions. These chests were then arranged on shelves
-in the niches of a sepulchral chamber excavated to a great depth in the
-solid rock.
-
-“In some of these chambers, with decorations as fresh as if made
-yesterday, we find to-day, after the lapse of three and four thousand
-years, a prodigious number of bodies of cats and other animals,
-sufficiently preserved to be recognized, thanks to the aromatic bitumen
-with which they were impregnated. Well, the examination of these old
-relics conveys information on one point of great interest: it shows us
-that the domestic animals of those remote times did not differ from
-those of our own day. As were the ox, dog, cat, four thousand years
-ago, such they are to-day.
-
-“The cat—since it is the cat I am going to tell you about to-day—the
-cat in particular is like ours in every way. The rat-hunter of forty
-centuries ago differs in nothing from our tom-cat. But where did it
-come from, so long, long ago, in the houses of the Egyptians? Of what
-country was it a native?
-
-“To the south of Egypt lies Abyssinia, where we have already found the
-wild dog, from which probably came our greyhound. There, too, is still
-found, sometimes wild in the heart of the forest, sometimes
-domesticated, a kind of cat, called the gloved cat, that presents a
-striking resemblance to our domestic variety. It is generally agreed
-that this is the parent stock of our cats, though perhaps only in part,
-since there is reason to believe that a second species, Asiatic
-according to all appearance, has a place in the pedigree of our
-domestic cat as we now know it. Briefly, the cat came to us from
-Eastern Africa.
-
-“In the old forests of Europe, and notably in those of the east of
-France, there is found, in no great numbers, a kind of cat called the
-wildcat, but which cannot be regarded as the progenitor of the domestic
-cat, in spite of current opinion to the contrary. Fitted by nature for
-violent exercise, for fighting and tree-climbing, and for making long
-leaps, it has longer and stronger legs than the common cat, a larger
-head, and more powerful jaws. The tail, very furry and variegated with
-black rings, is more expanded at the end than at the base. The coat is
-a warm fur of yellowish gray with large black stripes, transverse and
-encircling the body, thus imitating a little the tiger’s coat. A dark
-band extends the entire length of the spine from the nape of the neck
-to the tail. Finally, the fleshy balls of the soles of the feet, and
-also the lips and nose, are black.
-
-“The domestic cat, on the contrary, generally has red lips as well as
-nose and balls of the feet. It also has on the front of the neck and
-breast a band of light color sometimes extending under the stomach.
-Similar coloring of nose, lips, feet, and front of the neck is found,
-in exact detail, in the wild species of Abyssinia or the gloved cat;
-and that is one of the reasons for regarding this species as the
-source, or at least as one of the sources, of the domestic cat.”
-
-“But I have often seen domestic cats with black lips,” objected Louis.
-“Where do they come from?”
-
-“They are apparently in some way related to the wildcats of our woods.
-The female cats of isolated dwellings near our large forests sometimes
-mate with wildcats, it is said. The young of these parents bear
-inscribed on the nose and lips their paternal origin, and transmit
-these family traits to their descendants. But if this crossing gives
-new vigor to our cat, it is far from improving its disposition. The
-wildcat of our woods is in fact an intractable animal, unruly despite
-all the care we bestow upon it. It is an implacable destroyer of game
-and, if chance offers, a more formidable ravager of the hen-roost than
-the fox.
-
-“It is believed that one of our domestic varieties, known as the
-tiger-cat, counts this bandit among its ancestors; at any rate, it has
-the wildcat’s black lips and zebra coat. It also has its disposition to
-a certain degree. The tiger-cat is the least tame of all, the most
-distrustful, the most inclined to plunder. No other is so ready with
-its claws if you try to take hold of it or merely stroke it on the
-back. But these peculiarities of savagery ought not to make us forget
-its good qualities: there is no more spirited hunter of mice. It is
-true that cheese forgotten on the table and game hung too low in the
-kitchen attract its attention a little too readily.
-
-“I much prefer the Spanish or tortoise-shell cat, which is more
-civilized, of gentler disposition, and not less adept at catching mice.
-It is in this variety, one of the most widely diffused, that the
-original feline characteristics are the best preserved, that is to say
-those of the gloved cat of Abyssinia. The Spanish cat has rather short
-and brightly colored fur, the balls of the feet, the lips, and the nose
-red, the front of the neck light-colored. Its coat is generally spotted
-with irregular patches of pure white, black, and bright red. But,
-singularly enough, the three colors are never found united except in
-the female; the male is limited to two colors at most, generally white
-and red.”
-
-“Then every cat with three colors to its fur is a she-cat?” asked
-Jules.
-
-“So far I have met with no exception to this strange rule.”
-
-“It is very queer, that unequal division of colors—three for the Tabby
-and only two at most for the Tom-cat. Other animals show nothing of the
-sort.”
-
-“The Angora cat forms a third variety. It is a magnificent animal, of
-majestic carriage, with silky and very long hair, especially around the
-neck, under the stomach, and on the tail. But its qualities do not
-equal the fineness of its fur. The Angora is the friend of sweet
-idleness, fond of prolonged siestas in drawing-room arm-chairs. Do not
-try to make it watch patiently for a mouse in the garret. Pampered by
-its mistress, assured of its saucer of milk, it finds the business of
-hunting too arduous. Repose and caresses and a soft bed are its lot.
-That is all I have to say about this lazy-bones.
-
-“Let us pass on to the cat’s weapons, its teeth and claws. In telling
-you the story of the Auxiliaries I pointed out to you the arrangement
-of the cat’s teeth, so admirably adapted for coping with live prey. I
-will refresh your memory on this subject by showing you a sketch of
-these teeth. How well formed for cutting flesh are those molars, with
-their sharp points that play one against another like the blades of a
-pair of scissors! And those canine teeth, so long and sharp—aren’t they
-veritable daggers for the cat to stab the mouse with? How horribly they
-must pierce the poor little victim’s body! A mere glance at this set of
-teeth is enough to assure one that it belongs to a fierce hunter.
-
-“It is by surprise and stealth that the cat seizes its prey. Hence it
-must have special foot-gear to render its approach noiseless, to deaden
-completely the sound of its footsteps. And that reminds me of
-something. When you were younger, you were told the wonderful exploits
-of Puss-in-Boots, how Puss caught partridges and offered them to the
-king, as a gift from the cat’s master, the future Marquis of Carabas.”
-
-“Oh, yes,” cried Emile, “I remember. The artful creature, with a grain
-of wheat in its paw and the bag open, lay in wait for the partridges in
-a furrow. What astounding success we credited it with! The giddy
-partridges and innocent quails, and foolish young rabbits ran
-helter-skelter into the bag. According to us, the game of the entire
-canton was bagged. One day the cat defied the ogre to take the form of
-every kind of animal in turn, as he pretended he had the power to do.
-The stupid ogre hastened to change himself into a lion first, then into
-a mouse. But in a half a jiffy out shoot the cat’s claws, the mouse is
-caught, and the ogre is gobbled up. Thenceforth the castle belongs to
-the miller’s son, who has become the Marquis of Carabas, as true as can
-be. Then the wedding is celebrated with great magnificence. Isn’t that
-the way it goes, Uncle?”
-
-“Precisely; only I must say to you that I object to the boots in that
-performance. How, with such foot-gear thumping and creaking on the
-gravel in the road, can the cat approach the game without being heard?”
-
-“That’s so. Let us take off the boots. We will suppose the cat leaves
-them at the mill while it is out hunting, and that it only wears them
-on great occasions.”
-
-“How much wiser the real cat is than the one in the story! It would not
-wear noisy boots and run the risk of making the garret floor creak
-under its footsteps. If the mouse heard the slightest sound of hard
-soles, it would never come out of its hole. What the cat really needs
-is slippers and not boots or wooden shoes—slippers thick and soft so as
-to muffle the footfall completely.
-
-“Let us examine the underside of the cat’s paw. You will see under each
-toe a little ball of flesh, a real cushion softly stuffed. Another
-ball, much larger, occupies the center. In addition, tufts of down fill
-up the intervening spaces. Thus shod, the cat walks as if on tow or
-wadding, and no ear can hear it coming. Have we not there, I ask you,
-slippers of silence, marvelously adapted to surprise attacks?”
-
-“It is a fact,” assented Louis, “that we never hear the cat coming.”
-
-“The dog, too,” added Jules, “has similar little cushions, only larger,
-under its paws. Nevertheless we hear its footsteps, perhaps on account
-of the claws scraping the ground a little.”
-
-“Your ‘perhaps’ is superfluous,” his uncle rejoined. “It is certainly
-the claws scraping the ground that make the dog’s walk heard in spite
-of the fleshy balls.”
-
-“How does the cat manage, then?” asked Jules. “It has claws and very
-strong ones.”
-
-“That is the cat’s secret. When walking and sleeping it keeps its claws
-drawn back in a sheath at the extremity of the toes; it has then what
-we call velvet paws. Thus drawn into their case, the claws do not
-project beyond the paw and cannot strike the ground. To this first
-advantage of not making any noise in walking is added another not less
-useful to the cat. Completely hidden inside their sheaths, the claws do
-not get blunt; they preserve their sharpness and fine point for the
-attack. They are excellent weapons, and the animal keeps them in a case
-until they are needed. Then the claws shoot out of their sheaths as if
-pushed by a spring, and the velvet paw of a moment ago becomes a
-horrible harpoon that implants itself in the flesh and rends the prey
-in most sanguinary fashion.”
-
-“If I give the cat’s paw a little squeeze with my fingers,” said Emile,
-“the claws come out of their sheaths; if I stop squeezing, the claws go
-in again.”
-
-“That is just what the cat can do at will. Let us examine this curious
-mechanism more closely. The little terminal bone of the toes, the one
-that bears the claw, is fastened to the preceding little bone by an
-elastic ligament, the effect of which, in a state of repose, is to
-raise the first bone and rest it on top of the second. Suppose that the
-tips of your fingers had play enough to fold back: there you have an
-exact representation of the process. In this position of the terminal
-bone the claw is held upright, half sunk in a fold of the skin and
-hidden under the thick fur of the paw.”
-
-“I understand,” said Jules; “then it is a velvet paw; the claws are in
-their sheaths.”
-
-“Promptly, at the call to arms, the cat has but to will it, and its
-claws spring out. Look at this picture of a cat’s paw and notice what
-appears to be a network of cords. Those are the tendons which, whenever
-the animal so desires, are pulled by the muscles situated higher up.
-They are fastened each to the lower side of one of the terminal bones
-of the toes. Pulled by its tendon, this terminal bone pivots, as if on
-a hinge, on the extremity of the preceding bone, and gets in a straight
-line with it. At the same time the pointed end of the claw comes out of
-the paw.”
-
-“Then the cat’s claws are worked by cords and pulleys!” exclaimed
-Emile. “It is enough to bewilder one, it is so complicated. But I
-understand it in the main. To make velvet paws the cat doesn’t have to
-do anything at all; the claws go in of their own accord and stay in
-their sheaths; and if they have to be drawn out, the cords or tendons
-give a pull, and the thing is done.”
-
-“To be shod with soft slippers which both admit of a noiseless approach
-to the hunted prey and can, on the instant, change into terrible
-weapons of attack, is not alone sufficient for the hunter’s success; he
-must also have eyes to guide him in the darkness of midnight, the hour
-most favorable for an ambuscade. In this respect the cat is admirably
-equipped. Its eyes are formed for receiving more or less light as may
-be necessary for seeing.
-
-“Notice a cat in the sun. You will see the pupil of the eyes reduced to
-a narrow slit resembling a black line. Not to be dazzled by too great
-light, the animal has closed the passage to the rays of light; it has
-closed the pupil while leaving the eyes wide open. Take the cat into
-the shade: the slit of the eyes will enlarge and become an oval. Put it
-in a semi-dark place: the oval opening will dilate to a circle and this
-circle will grow larger as the light diminishes.
-
-“Thanks to these pupils, which open very wide and can thus still manage
-to receive a little light where for others it would be pitch-dark, the
-cat guides itself in the dark and hunts at night even better than in
-broad daylight, since it remains invisible to the mice while it can see
-them well enough. Nevertheless, if there were no light, if the darkness
-were absolute, the cat could not see anything. In this connection,
-recall what we were saying a while ago about nocturnal birds of prey.
-Some maintain that a cat sees distinctly in complete darkness; I have
-shown you, on the contrary, that for every animal without exception
-sight becomes impossible as soon as there ceases to be even the
-faintest ray of light.”
-
-“The cat cannot see without some light, I haven’t the slightest doubt,”
-assented Jules. “But all the same I have known it to hunt in places
-where not a glimmer of light could get in.”
-
-“Then its mustaches served to guide it; these are frequently made use
-of by the cat when it cannot see.”
-
-“Mustaches!” Emile exclaimed. “Oh, what a queer guide! And how can
-those long hairs that stand out on its lip tell it where it is?”
-
-“Perhaps you think the cat wears mustaches simply as a bit of swagger.
-Undeceive yourself: they are a valuable item of its equipment for
-hunting by night. With them it feels the ground, gets its bearings,
-explores nooks and corners. Let a mouse so much as graze one of those
-long hairs sticking out in all directions, and that is enough to warn
-the cat. Immediately the jaw snaps and the claw seizes. Moral: never
-cut a cat’s mustaches; you would place it in a sad predicament,
-seriously impairing its efficiency as a mouser.”
-
-“That’s what I’ve heard said,” Louis remarked, “though I didn’t know
-the reason for it. Now I see that to deprive a cat of its mustaches,
-out of childish mischievousness, is like depriving a blind man of his
-cane.”
-
-“In my humble opinion,” Uncle Paul continued, “the cat has been
-slandered. The eloquent historian of animals, Buffon, speaks thus about
-the cat: ‘It is an unfaithful servant, kept only out of necessity, as
-the enemy of another and still more troublesome inhabitant of our
-houses, otherwise not to be got rid of.’”
-
-“Buffon means the rat and mouse?” was Emile’s query.
-
-“Evidently. ‘Although cats,’ says he, ‘especially when young, have
-pretty ways, they have at the same time an innate malice, a treacherous
-disposition, a perverse nature, which age increases and education only
-masks. From being determined thieves they become, under domestication,
-docile and fawning rogues: they have the same skill, the same
-cleverness, the same taste for mischief, the same tendency to petty
-pilfering, as have rogues. Like them, they know how to cover their
-tracks, dissimulate their purpose, watch for their opportunity, lie in
-wait, choose their time, seize the right moment for their stroke, then
-steal away and escape punishment, scamper off and keep out of sight
-until they are called back. They make a show of attachment, nothing
-more, as one can see in their sly movements and shifty eyes. They never
-look the loved one in the face; whether from distrust or falsity, they
-take a roundabout way of approach and of winning the caresses which
-they value only for the momentary pleasure they themselves receive. It
-cannot be said that cats, although living in our homes, are thoroughly
-domesticated. The best tamed among them are no whit more brought under
-control than the rest; one might even say that they are entirely beyond
-control. They do only what they choose, and nothing in the world would
-avail to keep them for a moment in a place they desired to leave.
-Furthermore, most of them are still half wild, do not know their
-masters, frequent only garrets and roofs, and sometimes the kitchen and
-pantry when they are hungry. They are less attached to persons than to
-houses.’”
-
-“To my mind,” commented Jules, “that accusation amounts to no more than
-this, that Buffon did not like cats.”
-
-“Oh, perhaps,” suggested Louis, “he wrote it when he was vexed at some
-misdeed committed by his tom-cats.”
-
-“I, for my part,” Uncle Paul replied, “will say this to you: treat the
-cat well, and it will not be wild; feed it, and it will not turn thief;
-show it a little attention, and it will return the compliment. But what
-a miserable fate it often has! It is allowed to grow thin with hunger
-under the pretense that then it will hunt rats better. If it comes into
-the kitchen, mewing for something to eat, it is driven out with a
-broom; if it ventures into the dining-room to gather up the crumbs
-fallen from the table, the dog, suspecting designs on the bone it holds
-between its paws, growls and makes a move to throttle the invader. As a
-last resort the poor animal takes to pilfering. Who would go so far as
-to call this a crime? Certainly not Uncle Paul.”
-
-“Nor I either,” chimed in Jules; “for it must eat.”
-
-“Buffon says the cat does not become attached to its master, that it
-shows no signs of affection. I appeal the case to your own memories of
-the matter. When Minette, our gentle cat, installs herself with loud
-purrings on Emile’s knees in the chimney-corner and rubs her pretty red
-nose on his cheeks, then on his forehead, and higher still until it
-makes his cap fall off, are not those, I ask you, kisses and caresses
-of the most affectionate sort? Emile is transported with delight when
-his cap tumbles to the floor under the poking of that delicate nose. He
-puts it on again and the friendly rubbing begins afresh.”
-
-“Certainly,” Emile assented, “the cat gives me caress for caress. Her
-look is affectionate, not treacherous and distrustful, as the author
-says, that you have just been reading. And then Minette never steals,
-and always has velvet paws for me. She hasn’t once given me a scratch
-in all the time we have played together.”
-
-“Emile forgets one very good quality,” put in Jules. “Minette is a
-splendid hunter. Let her hear the slightest rustle anywhere, and there
-she will sit for hours and hours on the watch, motionless, patient, all
-eyes and ears. A mouse heard is for her a mouse caught. But it isn’t
-hunger that gives her that love of hunting, for she kills her mouse and
-then leaves it lying there, with no desire to eat it.”
-
-“Minette has other talents too,” Emile hastened to add. “When there is
-going to be a change in the weather, she licks her paws and washes her
-ears and nose over and over. Then you say, that is a sign of snow, or a
-sign of storm. And the cat’s prediction is hardly ever wrong. When the
-north wind blows cold and dry, I like to rub my hand over her fur and
-make the bright sparks fly. In the evening I like to hear her
-rerr-rerr, which makes me sleepy.”
-
-“Why,” asked Uncle Paul in conclusion, “do not Minette’s good qualities
-agree with what Buffon says? Because you love the cat and the cat loves
-you in return. Animals, my dear children, are what people make them.
-Good master, good servant.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXVII
-
-SHEEP
-
-
-“Concerning the cat’s origin there are surmises, probabilities;
-concerning the sheep’s origin nothing is yet known. But if we are
-ignorant from what wild species the sheep descends, we are at least
-certain it came to us from Asia, where man has raised flocks of these
-useful animals from the earliest recorded times.”
-
-“The East gave us the dog, cat, and sheep,” Jules here interposed, “and
-from what you said in some of our former talks, I got the impression
-that the other domestic animals also came from Asia.”
-
-“The Asiatic origin of our oldest known and most important domestic
-animals is a truth that all the records of history affirm without a
-shadow of doubt. We owe to the East the ox, horse, donkey, sheep, goat,
-pig, dog, cat, hen. Civilization, in fact, had its cradle in the lands
-of central Asia, where already there were flourishing peoples versed in
-sheep-raising and agriculture when in our western countries man, still
-plunged in wretched barbarism, lived only by the chase and hunted the
-bear and urus with his stone weapons.”
-
-“Then those ancient peoples of the East came and settled here and
-brought the first domestic animals with them?” asked Jules.
-
-“That is just how it happened, and hence the Asiatic origin of our
-oldest domestic animals.”
-
-“Doubtless the sheep was with the new-comers?”
-
-“Very likely; for its habits to-day show the sheep to have been
-dependent on man a very long time. No species has undergone so radical
-a change from its primitive character; and this indicates a very early
-domestication.
-
-“In the beginning, when it wandered wild on the grassy plateaus of
-Asia, the sheep must have had means of defense against its enemies,
-since otherwise the species would have become extinct. It was not
-enough for it to crop the greensward; it must also have been able to
-hold its own when menaced, or at least to escape from danger by flight.
-The other domestic species shared the same risks as a necessary
-concomitant of freedom; but all knew how to defend themselves, and all,
-under man’s protection, have nevertheless kept the use of their own
-means of protection. Left to itself, the dog, by its courage and its
-murderous jaws, valiantly copes with any assailant; the horse flees at
-full gallop or breaks the enemy’s bones with a vigorous kick; the cat
-climbs trees and from her lofty fortress braves the foe; bulls group
-themselves in a circle, the weak ones in the center, the strong at the
-circumference, with horns pointing out, and woe then to any creature
-that dares to approach; the goat overthrows the aggressor by butting
-with lowered head. What can the sheep do in its turn when in danger?
-Nothing. With no thought of defending itself, imbecile and stupid, it
-waits for the wolf to come and devour it.
-
-“Look at a flock of sheep, startled by some unusual noise. They rush
-headlong, bewildered with fear; they crowd together, press against one
-another, lower their heads to the ground, then await, motionless, the
-issue of the event. The wolf, if it be a wolf that has caused the
-panic, has only to choose its victim out of this compact mass: there
-will be no thought of resistance or flight. What would become of the
-poor creatures if shepherds and dogs were not there to protect them? In
-a few days they would all perish, sacrificing their last drop of blood
-to the wolf. See them again in the open country in bad weather. They
-press close to one another and refuse to budge, enduring rain and snow,
-shivering with wet and cold, while not one of them so much as thinks of
-seeking shelter. Their stupidity is such that they do not even seem to
-notice how unfavorable their situation is; they come to a standstill
-wherever they may happen to be, and obstinately stay there. To make
-them go and to conduct them to a more suitable spot, the shepherd is
-obliged to chase them before him and give them a leader taught to walk
-in front.
-
-“Certainly, in its primitive freedom the sheep could not have been the
-actual animal of our folds; it must have possessed the qualities
-necessary to sustain its existence; it must have found in itself means
-of protection and must at least have imitated the goat, which
-resolutely faces danger, or, if too weak, scales with unerring foot the
-ledges of rock and there takes refuge. The sheep, as we have it to-day,
-is absolutely incapable of living without man’s protection; left to
-itself, the whole species would soon perish, the victim of carnivorous
-animals and inclement weather. To lose thus all its native instincts
-and descend to the lowest degree of stupidity, how many centuries of
-servitude must it not have undergone? I would not venture to say; but
-at least I see that, after the dog, the sheep was one of the first
-animals tamed by man.
-
-“No other species, the dog alone excepted, has undergone so complete a
-transformation at our hands. Let me tell you some of the strange
-results obtained. In Africa, Madagascar, and India there is found a
-breed of sheep in which the tail, loaded with a heavy mass of fat on
-each side, right and left, is transformed into a sort of ponderous
-battledore, broader at its base than the body itself. The weight of
-this inconvenient appendage amounts to and even exceeds thirty pounds.”
-
-“Inconvenient appendage I should say it would be,” remarked Louis. “The
-sheep cannot walk very easily with that heavy battledore knocking
-against its hocks. The tallow from that tail would make a good many
-candles, but it is a very troublesome sort of treasure when one has to
-run away from a wolf.”
-
-“This breed is called the broad-tailed sheep. Other sheep, particularly
-in southern Russia, have tails of moderate size, like the tails of our
-sheep, but very long so that they drag on the ground.”
-
-“Again a hindrance when fleeing from the wolf,” Jules observed. “In its
-primitive state the sheep certainly had neither this long trailing tail
-catching in the bushes, nor that other one in the shape of a heavy load
-of tallow.”
-
-“Neither had it the singular horns that it sometimes bears to-day. Some
-sheep have horns of excessive length and twisted in long spirals that
-sometimes stand erect on the top of the forehead, and sometimes point
-sidewise. Those weapons are more threatening than serviceable: they
-needlessly overburden the head and are a serious source of annoyance to
-the animal when it has to pass through a thicket of underbrush. As if
-to hamper themselves still more in the brambles, other breeds wear an
-addition to this inconvenient ornament. The sheep of the island of
-Cyprus have two pairs of horns, one standing straight up on the
-forehead, the other curving back behind the ears. Those of the Faroe
-Islands have three pairs, all arranged spirally and pointing backward.
-Our sheep, as a rule, have only two horns, rather small and making
-barely one turn at the sides of the head; apparently that is how the
-primitive species wore them. In fact the greater part of our flocks is
-composed of entirely hornless sheep. It is best for the animal, which
-is thus relieved of a useless load.
-
-“These horns, double or triple in number, and twisting in curious
-fashion, this tail so long that it trails on the ground, or else
-swollen with tallow and broad beyond measure, while showing us what
-singular modifications the body of the sheep is capable of, are of no
-use to us whatever. It is much to be preferred that the animal,
-profiting by the care we bestow upon it, should gain in weight and
-furnish more abundant food material. The English, who are great
-meat-eaters, were the first to ask themselves this question: how to
-make the sheep an abundant source of mutton chops and legs of mutton,
-or, in other words, how to increase to the utmost the proportion of it
-that can be eaten and at the same time diminish or even reduce to
-nothing that which cannot?
-
-“A celebrated breeder, a benefactor to humanity—Bakewell was his
-name—solved the problem in England about a century ago. He said to
-himself: The sheep that I want as a producer of legs of mutton must
-have no horns, for these useless ornaments would mean so much pure loss
-in the total weight of the animal; the food required for the growth and
-maintenance of the horns would be better employed in producing flesh.
-For the same reason it should have only just enough wool to clothe it
-and protect it from the cold. The bones I cannot eliminate, the more’s
-the pity, as in their place I should prefer something of greater
-nutritive value. But as a matter of fact they are necessary to the
-animal: they are the indispensable framework for the flesh. If I cannot
-eliminate them, the bones shall at least be light, thin, reduced in
-weight and size. When the leg of mutton is served at table, the knife
-must be able to penetrate it like a ball of butter and find in the
-center only a small, hard drum-stick. I will reduce in like manner all
-that is not meat and leave the sheep only what is strictly necessary
-for the functions of life.”
-
-“And that came to pass as the breeder wished?” asked Jules.
-
-“That came to pass just as Bakewell foresaw. In his sheepfolds the
-animal was transformed into an opulent source of meat, such as had
-never been seen before; it became a pair of enormous legs of mutton and
-a pair of enormous shoulders, led to pasture by a small head on four
-thin legs.”
-
-“With large mutton chops mixed in?” Emile inquired.
-
-“To be sure. A few figures will show you the importance of the result
-obtained. The gross weight of our ordinary sheep averages thirty
-kilograms, representing about twenty kilograms net of meat. The
-Leicester sheep, as the perfected breed developed by Bakewell’s
-exertions is called, weighs from sixty to one hundred and sometimes one
-hundred and fifty kilograms; and its net yield in meat varies from
-fifty to one hundred kilograms; that is, at the very lowest, two and a
-half times as much meat as our common sheep produces, and at the
-highest, which is exceptional, I admit, five times as much.”
-
-“Then man can do what he likes with his domestic animals to change them
-as he pleases?” asked Louis.
-
-“He does not do exactly as he likes, for the organization is from its
-very nature bounded by definite limits which no effort of ours can set
-aside; but by holding one end constantly in view and bending every
-exertion toward its attainment he can do much. The great means used by
-Bakewell on the breeding of sheep, and utilized since for the
-improvement of various other domestic animals, consists above all in
-selection, which I have already told you something about in speaking of
-the dog. Selection is called into play when the breeder singles out and
-sets apart for the propagation of the species those individuals that
-show in the highest degree the qualities he desires. These qualities,
-however feeble at first, are capable of great development in the course
-of several generations; for the offspring inherit the parents’
-qualities, keep them, and add to this inheritance certain qualities of
-their own.”
-
-“You compared that to a snowball increasing in size as it rolls,” said
-Jules.
-
-“Yes, my friend; the succeeding generations, always chosen from among
-the best, are the successive layers that bring their complement to the
-increase of the ball.”
-
-“The Leicester sheep must have acted on the snowball wonderfully, to
-increase its weight from thirty kilograms to one hundred and fifty.”
-
-“I admit that such a transformation is not brought about in a single
-year, and that Bakewell must have had great confidence in his method to
-devote his whole life to the pursuit of the end foreseen by his
-genius.”
-
-“What is this famous Leicester sheep like?” asked Emile.
-
-“Its trunk is all of a size, almost cylindrical. The head is small,
-bald, and without horns. It is supported by a neck so slender and short
-that the head appears to spring directly from the trunk.”
-
-“To judge by the picture you are showing us, one would say that the
-head came out of a hole made in the middle of the fleece.”
-
-“That comes from the smallness of the neck. The wool, long and coarse,
-takes the form of pointed locks hanging down and not very close
-together, so that the whole fleece weighs much less than one would
-suppose from the size of the animal. The four legs are thin and naked.
-All the bones in short, are remarkably light, having only enough
-solidity to support the animal’s massive bulk of flesh.”
-
-“Is this breed found in France?” Louis asked.
-
-“With us it is represented by the Flemish breed, raised in Flanders,
-Normandy, and Poitou. It is the most corpulent of the French varieties,
-furnishing sheep that weigh as much as sixty kilograms, and more. In
-the second class for size comes the Picardy breed, scattered over
-Picardy, Brie, and Beauce. The sylvan breed of Touraine, Sologne,
-Bourgogne, Anjou, in short a great part of central France, is smaller
-still. It is remarkable for the fineness of its wool and the excellence
-of its flesh. By its side may be placed the Provence breed, occupying
-Roussillon, Provence, and Languedoc. Immense flocks of this variety
-graze during the winter in the salt marshes bordering the
-Mediterranean, notably in the vast pebbly plain of Crau and in the
-island of Camargue which the forks of the Rhone form at the mouth of
-that river. After the cold weather is past, these flocks move up to the
-high mountains of Dauphiny, where they pass the whole summer out of
-doors. I will come back in a few moments to their interesting
-migrations.
-
-“Besides meat, the sheep furnishes us wool, which is still more
-important, since it is the best material for our clothing. Other
-animals, the ox and pig for example, feed us with their flesh; only the
-sheep can clothe us. With wool we make mattresses and weave cloth,
-flannel, serge, in fact all the different fabrics best adapted for
-protecting us from the cold. It is far and away the most suitable
-material for clothing; cotton, despite its importance, takes only
-second place; and silk, with all its fine qualities, is very inferior
-to wool for actual service. The sheep’s coat, more than anything else,
-we use for clothing; we cover ourselves with its fleece after
-converting it by spinning and weaving into magnificent cloth.”
-
-“All the same,” objected Emile, “wool is not in the least beautiful
-when it is on the animal’s back; it is dirty, badly combed, often
-completely covered with filth. To be changed into the fleece suitable
-for cloth it must go through a good many processes.”
-
-“A good many, indeed. We will speak only of the first, for the others
-would lead us too far from our subject.
-
-“As it is found on the sheep, the wool is soiled by the sweat of the
-animal and by dust, which together form a layer of dirt called natural
-grease. An energetic washing is necessary to remove these impurities.
-The best way is to wash the sheep itself before shearing. The flock is
-driven to the edge of a stream, not so cold as to endanger the health
-of the animals, and there each sheep is seized in turn by men who
-plunge it into the water and rub and squeeze the fleece with their
-hands until the grease has disappeared and the water runs clear from
-the tufts of wool. That is what is called washing on the back, because
-the wool is cleaned on the body itself, on the animal’s back.
-
-“At other times the sheep is shorn without having been washed first,
-just as it comes out of the fold, with all its coating of dust and
-sweat. The wool thus obtained is called greasy wool, while the washed
-fleece is known as greaseless wool. The greasy wool is too dirty to be
-used as it is, even for making mattresses; it is washed in a stream of
-running water, and then it is like the wool taken from a washed sheep.
-
-“To shear a sheep, the animal is tied fast by all four legs to keep it
-from moving and perhaps getting cut during the operation; then it is
-placed on a table about as high as a man is tall, and with large,
-wide-bladed shears the wool is clipped off as close as possible to the
-skin without at the same time cutting the poor animal. As the locks of
-wool are naturally curly and entangled, the fleece comes off all in one
-piece.
-
-“Sheep are white, brown, and black. White wool can be dyed any shade,
-from the lightest to the darkest, whereas black or brown will only take
-dark colors. White wool, therefore, is always preferred to any other;
-but however beautiful it may be after all impurities have been removed
-by washing, it is still far from possessing the degree of whiteness
-that it should have if it is to be used without dyeing. Accordingly it
-is bleached by being exposed in a closed room to the suffocating vapor
-that comes from burning sulphur.
-
-“Wool varies in value according to the sheep that produced it; there
-are different degrees of coarseness and fineness and length. The best
-wool, that which is reserved for the finest stuffs, comes from a breed
-of sheep raised principally in Spain and known by the name of merino.
-This breed has a squat, short, thick body, legs strong and short, large
-head furnished with stout horns that fall in a spiral behind the ear,
-woolly forehead, and a very snub nose. The skin, fine and pink, forms
-at different parts of the body, chiefly around the neck, ample folds
-which give room for additional fleece. Wool covers the whole body,
-except the muzzle, from the edge of the hoofs to a rim around the eyes.
-It is fine, curly, elastic, and short. The grease with which it is
-impregnated is very abundant, so that the dust sticking to it forms on
-the surface of the fleece a grayish crust, a sort of plate-armor, which
-splits open here and there with a slight crackling sound when the
-animal moves, and closes of itself when the animal is at rest. By
-washing, these impurities all disappear and merino wool then shows the
-whiteness of snow and has a softness that rivals silk.
-
-“In Spain the merino flocks pass the winter in the fertile plains of
-the South, in a climate remarkable for its mildness. At the beginning
-of April they start for the high mountains of the North, which they
-reach after a journey of a month or six weeks. All through the summer
-they remain in the highland pastures, rich in savory greensward which
-the summer sun never dries up, and at the end of September they descend
-again to the plains of the South. These traveling flocks, changing from
-plain to mountain and from mountain to plain, according to the season,
-are called migratory flocks. Some of them number as many as ten
-thousand animals, tended by fifty shepherds and as many dogs.”
-
-“It must be very interesting,” said Jules, “to see those immense flocks
-in motion along the highways when they go to or from their mountain
-pasture.”
-
-“What takes place in the south of France can give us some idea of this.
-I told you that the vast plains of the Mediterranean coast, the plains
-of Crau and Camargue, support flocks of considerable size, which
-emigrate to the mountains of Dauphiny when warm weather comes, and
-return home on the approach of cold.”
-
-“Are those sheep merinos?” Jules asked.
-
-“No, my friend: they are ordinary sheep; but, like the merinos, they
-travel alternately from the plain to the mountains and from the
-mountains to the plain; in a word, they are migratory flocks. Let us
-look at them on their return journey.
-
-“At the head are the donkeys laden with clothing and provisions. Large
-and heavy bells hang from their collars, each collar being made of a
-big sheet of bent deal. If they spy a thistle beside the road, they
-turn out and with a grimace crop the savory mouthful with a movement of
-their lips, after which they at once return to their posts of
-file-leaders. In large panniers of plaited grass one of them carries
-the lambs born on the journey, too weak to follow the flock. The poor
-little things bleat, their heads nodding to the movements of their
-nags, and the mothers answer from the midst of the throng. Next come
-the ill-smelling, high-horned, flat-nosed, cross-eyed he-goats; the
-bells attached to the wooden collars ring under their thick beards.
-After them come the she-goats, their heavy udders, swollen with milk,
-striking against their hams. By their side caper the giddy band of
-young kids and goats, already beginning to butt with their foreheads.
-Such is the vanguard.
-
-“Who is this with holly stick cut from an alpine hedge and large
-drugget cloak draped over his shoulder? It is the head shepherd, the
-one responsible for the flock. At his heels come the rams, leaders of
-the stupid common sheep. Their horns, twisted into a pointed spiral,
-make three and four turns. They have deal collars like those of the
-he-goats and asses; but their large bells, sign of honor, have a wolf’s
-tooth for tongue. Tufts of red wool, another sign of distinction, are
-fastened to their fleece on the sides and back. In the midst of a cloud
-of dust comes now the main flock, its members crowded close together
-and bleating, their countless little hoofs striking the ground with a
-noise like that of a storm. In the rear straggle the loiterers, the
-lame, the crippled, the ewes accompanied by their lambs. These last, at
-the briefest stop, bend their knees, take the teat in their mouth, and,
-while their tail trembles and wriggles, butt the udder with their
-forehead to start the flow of milk. The shepherds bring up the rear,
-urging on the slow ones with their cries and giving orders to the dogs,
-their lieutenants that go and come on the flanks of the army and watch
-that none go astray. If all is in good order, the dogs walk beside
-their masters, pensive, fully appreciating the seriousness of their
-functions, and perhaps thinking of the woods they came from, the dark
-woods where there are bears.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXVIII
-
-THE GOAT
-
-
-“In the hilly regions of Persia there are found herds of wild goats of
-a kind that is universally regarded as the parent stock of the domestic
-variety. This goat closely resembles our own in size and form. It has a
-grayish fawn-colored coat with a black line on the backbone. The tail
-and forehead are black, the cheeks red, the beard and throat brown. The
-horns have sharp edges on the front side and are short in the female,
-very long in the male, always erect on the forehead, and not rolling
-back behind the ears like those of the ram.
-
-“In domestication the goat has preserved its primitive instincts, no
-doubt because, being of less value than the sheep, it has not been so
-carefully and completely tamed by man. It has remained with us much as
-it was on the bare rocks of its native country, lively, wandering,
-adventurous, fond of lonely and steep places, delighting in rocky
-summits, sleeping on the edge of precipices, and always ready to use
-its horns at the slightest appearance of hostility.
-
-“Willingly it accompanies the sheep to pasture, but without mixing with
-the flock, the stupid society of which is not to its taste. It walks at
-the head, staying its impatience on the way by browsing an occasional
-twig in the hedgerow.”
-
-“That’s the way the he-goats of the emigrating flock go, the captains
-of the company,” put in Jules. “The she-goats follow pell-mell with the
-kids. Left to themselves, they would walk at the head and occupy the
-post of honor held by the donkeys and he-goats.”
-
-“Arrived at the pasture, the sheep begin peacefully cropping the grass
-without straying too far from the spot chosen by the shepherd. Besides,
-the dog is there to call to order any that might tend to wander away.”
-
-“But the goats don’t listen to the dog’s warning: their wish is to go
-and flock apart, is it not?” asked Emile.
-
-“Precisely. The turf is green, smooth as a carpet; the grass thick and
-tender. What more could be desired? But no, the goats will have none of
-it. The rich grass and the company of the timid sheep are not what they
-are after. Away up yonder, on the top of the hill, are some great
-rocks, cleft and overturned in disorder. In the clefts, where a handful
-of earth has lodged, there are thin tufts of grass half dried up by the
-sun; between the fragments of stone a few pitiful shrubs with scanty
-foliage manage to find room for their roots. Those are the goat’s
-haunts of delight. Nothing can keep it from them; away it goes.
-
-“Soon you will see it on the steep slope of the rocks, moving about
-with ease where any other animal would break its neck, and sometimes
-having no more secure support than a narrow ledge that offers barely
-room enough for its four hoofs. From this perilous position it
-stretches its neck in an effort to reach the neighboring bush, a bush
-no better than countless others that are in places easy of access; but
-the difficulty gives it an added charm, and to get it the goat risks
-its life on slopes that would be its destruction if it should chance to
-slip. But don’t worry about that: the goat will not fall; its sinewy
-leg is of unequalled surety, and its head, giddy though it seems, is
-never seized with vertigo on the brink of a precipice. The coveted bit
-of foliage is reached, the bush twisted out of shape in its attainment,
-and the ascent continues from one projection to another. The goat is at
-the top of the rock. It proclaims its prowess to the surrounding world
-with bleatings. The sheep are down there, beneath its feet. Proudly it
-surveys them, saying perhaps to itself: Poor, timid creatures, they
-will never climb up here!
-
-“I must tell you, my friends, that the goat is very hard to keep in
-flocks. Its wandering propensity always impels it to stray, and its
-predilection for precipices leads it to places where it would be
-dangerous for the shepherd to follow. It has a still worse caprice. I
-have pictured the goat to you as abandoning at the first opportunity
-the rich grass in which the sheep delights, to scale the rocky summit
-and crop the sparse shrubbery growing on some perilous ledge. It is an
-undoubted fact that to the tender grass of the best pasture it prefers
-hard turf, yellowed in the sun, dried and trodden, and especially the
-young woody sprouts of the shrub and bush. Thus far all is for the
-best, since such tastes enable us to gain profit from the most sterile
-soil and even from the bare rock. Where the sheep would die of want,
-the goat finds the wherewithal to fill its udder with milk.
-Unfortunately its passion for the bitter bark of the shrub has evil
-consequences. Cultivated grounds, gardens, orchards, quickset hedges,
-copses, and woods have no more terrible enemy than the goat. The young
-shoots are eagerly browsed, the bark is gnawed, and all shrubbery
-within reach is destroyed. Accordingly, to prevent these ravages,
-severe laws forbid flocks of goats access to all wooded tracts.”
-
-“I shouldn’t like such gnawers of branches and bark among the pear
-trees in the garden,” remarked Jules. “If any goats got in there, it
-would be good-by forever to those delicious juicy pears.”
-
-“I have told you the goat’s bad qualities; now let us look at its good
-ones. The goat is much more intelligent than the sheep. It comes to us
-of its own accord, makes friends with us readily, is responsive to
-caresses and capable of attachment. In households where it furnishes
-the milk supply it is the companion of the children, who know how to
-win its friendship by a few handfuls of choice grass. It takes part in
-their games and amuses them with its frolicsome gambols.”
-
-“It also runs with lowered head at its playmates as if it meant to
-knock them over with a butt of its horns,” added Emile; “but it is only
-in fun. They hold out an open hand, and the goat strikes the palm very
-softly without hurting it, provided they are good friends. If not, I
-shouldn’t like to find myself facing the goat’s horns.”
-
-“The goat is always friendly if well treated. Its butting is then
-harmless, and play does not degenerate into a fight.
-
-“To appreciate fully the kindness of the goat, one must have witnessed
-the following illustration of it. When a nursing baby has had the
-misfortune to lose its mother, it sometimes happens that the she-goat
-is substituted as a nurse. In this function the excellent animal is
-truly admirable; the tenderest mother is not more vigilant or more
-assiduous. To the wailing of the beloved baby it responds with a gentle
-bleating and runs to it in all haste, lying on its side the better to
-present its udder to the nursling. If there is any delay in putting the
-baby within reach, the goat by its restless movements, trembling voice,
-I might almost say by its gestures, begs that the infant be allowed to
-suck. How shall I express it, my friends? The animal in this action is
-sublime in its devotion.
-
-“Should you like now to see the goat giving proof of its tame, trustful
-nature? I will tell you how the milk-peddlers of our southern towns are
-in the habit of leading their flocks of goats through the streets, to
-sell from door to door the milk freshly drawn under the buyer’s very
-eyes. What would the timid sheep do if led thus through the turmoil and
-confusion of a populous town? It would take fright and run away, and in
-its foolish terror it would get crushed under the wheels of passing
-vehicles. The goat is not alarmed at anything. Throngs of people, the
-noise of traffic, the barking of quarrelsome dogs, to all this it is
-quite indifferent. The horned company, its approach heralded by the
-tinkling of little bells, moves with a confident and familiar air in
-the midst of all this hustle and bustle, as if in the perfect solitude
-of the mountains. With graceful coquetry it looks at its reflection in
-the large shop-windows and strikes the flag-stones of the pavement with
-ringing hoof. At the customers’ doors, which the flock never fails to
-remember, it comes to a halt. Each goat in its turn is taken in hand by
-the milkmaid, and the warm milk spurts foaming from the udder into the
-tin measure. They go on through the crowd to another customer, and so
-it continues, a measure of milk at a time, until the flock has
-exhausted its day’s supply.”
-
-“Is there anything gained by leading the goats from door to door?”
-asked Jules.
-
-“Unquestionably: the buyer cannot doubt the freshness and purity of the
-milk when he sees it drawn under his eyes; and the milkmaid finds in
-the confidence of her customers remuneration for her extra trouble.”
-
-“That’s so. No one can say the milk is watered if it comes fresh from
-the udder.”
-
-“Goat’s milk is light and very nourishing; it agrees with weak stomachs
-better than the heavier milk of the sheep or cow. It is remarkably
-abundant, too, considering the smallness of the animal. Two liters of
-milk a day, from six to nine months in the year, make but a moderate
-yield. There are goats that, when well-fed, give three and four liters
-a day.
-
-“Thus the goat, so easily maintained, is a valuable resource in
-mountainous and arid countries; it takes the place of the milch cow in
-the poor man’s hut, as the donkey serves instead of the horse.
-
-“This abundant milk supply is about the only merit of the goat, for its
-stringy flesh is tasteless and of no value. Only the kid is prized for
-eating, especially in the South, where the aromatic vegetation of the
-hills takes away its natural tastelessness. The goat’s fleece, though
-used for certain coarse fabrics, is not of much importance, either, and
-cannot in any way take the place of sheep’s wool. But a breed native in
-the hilly regions of Central Asia, the Cashmere goat, furnishes a down
-of incomparable fineness, from which precious stuffs are made. This
-goat, under a thick fur of long hair, bears an abundant down that
-protects it from the rigors of cold and is shed naturally every spring.
-When that season comes the animal is combed with a long toothed comb
-that gathers from the rest of the fleece the fine down detached from
-the skin.
-
-“Another breed, the Angora goat, almost rivals the Cashmere in fineness
-of down. It takes its name from the town of Angora in Turkey in Asia.
-Nothing could be more seductive in form, nothing more graceful, than
-these little goats with their long silky fleece, always pure white.
-From the same country come the Angora cat and the Angora rabbit, both
-furnished, like the goat, their compatriot, with long, silky, white
-fur.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXIX
-
-THE OX
-
-
-“The taming of the ox took place in Asia a very long time ago when our
-western countries were covered with wild forests in which a few
-miserable tattooed tribes wandered, living by the chase. Bringing the
-ox under subjection must have been one of the most memorable of events
-for the native of the Orient, since thereby the animal’s powerful
-shoulders lent themselves to the labors of agriculture, and the tiller
-of the soil profited accordingly. It must also have been a very
-dangerous undertaking, no doubt impossible without the help of the dog.
-The friendly goat perhaps came to man of its own accord; the peaceful
-sheep let itself be folded without resistance; but the ox, terrible in
-power and anger, throwing the disemboweled enemy heavenward with a toss
-of its horns, certainly did not let itself be led from its native
-forest to the stable without a fight. No account has come down to us of
-the brave men who first dared to attack the formidable beast with the
-hope of subjugating it; nor does any record remain of the difficult
-training which, perhaps prolonged through centuries, finally reduced
-the wild creature to a state of docility. The very first historical
-reference to the ox in the earliest annals of our race shows him to us
-as a patient, docile beast, submissive to the yoke, and in short no
-other than he is to-day.
-
-“But if these bull-tamers of ancient times remain unknown, all the East
-preserves the memory of their invaluable achievement. The man was
-forgotten, but the animal was fêted, here in one way, there in another,
-according to the fancy of a simple, imaginative people striving in
-every possible manner to evince gratitude for services rendered. I have
-told you of ancient Egypt and its raising of marble temples to the
-bull, and I have also described its practice of bowing the forehead to
-the dust when the majestic beast passed with its retinue of attendants.
-Elsewhere it was enjoined on every one as a religious duty of the most
-sacred kind to raise at least one ox; and, again, in still another
-country, where horned cattle were not yet plentiful enough to make it
-permissible to use them for food, the laws punished with death anybody
-who killed or even maltreated one of these animals. In our day, in
-India, the cow is a thrice-sacred animal. Its tail, symbol of honor, is
-carried as a standard before the great; and to win favors from Heaven
-the people believe there is no surer way than to smear the body with
-cow’s dung and then go and wash in the waters of the Ganges. These
-anointings with the holy dung make you smile, children; in me they
-arouse serious reflections. From what depths of misery must not the
-domestic animals have raised us if the Hindoo of our time still
-preserves in these strange rites some vestiges of the ancient
-veneration of the entire Orient for one of these animals, and that one
-the most important, the ox?”
-
-“I should say it was a strange rite,” declared Jules, “to daub oneself
-with dung in honor of the cow. They might have hit on a better way.”
-
-“In every age and in every land popular imagination has easily lent
-itself and still lends itself to extravagant notions. In the most
-important city of the South I have seen, I, Uncle Paul, the people
-leading through the streets, in triumphal procession, the fattened ox
-that was to be sacrificed on Easter Eve. A laurel branch on its
-forehead, many-colored ribbons on its horns, the peaceful beast bore on
-its shoulders a pretty little child, rosy, plump, clothed in a lamb’s
-skin. A retinue accompanied it in bright-colored costumes. Is not that
-a vague reminder of the procession of the bull Apis, with this
-difference that the Egyptian bull returned after the ceremony to its
-perfumed manger, while ours meets its end in the heavy blow awaiting it
-at the slaughter-house? It is the custom for the be-ribboned ox to be
-led from door to door, where its escort never fails to present the
-basin for offerings, great and small; for it is to be noted that at the
-bottom of every superstition is found the quest of the piece of coin.
-Thus takes place throughout all France, with more or less pomp, the
-procession of the fattened ox.
-
-“But here is a peculiarity worthy of note. If the house has a wide
-enough entrance door, the ox is led into the vestibule, where its
-presence is supposed to confer honor; and if by good luck at that
-moment the animal deposits on the floor some of the material used by
-the Hindoo for smearing himself, it is the greatest possible blessing
-for the visited. A prosperous future is presaged by a few spans’
-breadth of this dung, according to the hope and belief of the simple
-folk. You see, my friends, without leaving home we find, under a little
-different form, the Indian customs that make you smile so. I cannot but
-see therein the survivals of the ancient honors paid to the bull.
-Without explaining these customs to themselves, without knowing their
-origin, without understanding their significance, the people perpetuate
-them among us.”
-
-“The survivals from those old customs,” remarked Jules, “prove clearly
-that the acquisition of the ox left an ineffaceable trace on man’s
-mind; but, once more, why didn’t they hit on some better way to honor
-the ox?”
-
-“Well, if you want something better as a mark of honor, perhaps this
-will satisfy you: the invaluable animal has its name written forever
-among the stars, those jewels of the sky. I will explain myself.
-History tells us that we owe the invention of astronomy to the
-shepherds of the East, who spent their leisure night-hours, under the
-mildest of skies, in deciphering the secrets of the stars while their
-flocks rested in the open air. To get their bearings in the midst of
-the infinite multitude of stars, these shepherds gave to the principal
-groups or constellations names that have been perpetuated and that
-science still uses. Man’s most precious possession received at that
-time a celestial consecration by having its name given to such and such
-a part of the sky. One of the constellations was called Taurus (the
-bull); and that is what it still is and always will be called. In this
-group are seen stars that form an angle, the two branches of which
-represent the animal’s horns; there is also a superb star that darts
-red fire and suggests the sparkling eye of an infuriated bull. What
-greater honor could the bull receive than to be thus placed among the
-splendors of the sky?”
-
-“The shepherds’ idea fully satisfies me; nothing better could be
-imagined for the glorification of the ox. Other domestic animals
-doubtless have had places assigned them in the firmament?”
-
-“Of course. Another constellation is called Aries (the ram), another
-Capricornus (goat-horned).”
-
-“And how about the dog?” Emile asked.
-
-“The dog was not to be forgotten: is it not man’s earliest ally, the
-courageous servant that made possible the taming of the herd? Its name
-has been given to a magnificent constellation in which shines the
-brightest star in the sky.”
-
-“And the others, the cat, horse, pig, and donkey?”
-
-“None of them received from the ancient shepherds the honor of a place
-in the firmament, their acquisition being undoubtedly more recent and
-of less importance. Briefly, my friends, the most esteemed and the most
-ancient of our domestic animals have been glorified by honors never
-bestowed upon prince, emperor, or monarch. Man’s gratitude has placed
-them among the splendors of the firmament.
-
-“In Asia, where it originated, the ox is no longer found wild; but in
-the pampas of South America the species has resumed its primitive
-freedom and, mingled with horses that have become equally wild, lives
-in vast herds beyond the supervision of man. Pampas is the name given
-to the immense plains extending from Buenos Aires to the foot of the
-Cordilleras of the Andes. During the rainy season they furnish rich
-pasturage of tall grass, but in the dry season verdure disappears and
-the soil becomes a powdery plain where thistles wave. Nothing, not even
-a tree, breaks the uniformity of these plains, the limits of which
-cannot be seen in any direction. There lives the wild ox, descendant of
-the domesticated ox that the Spaniards brought to this part of the New
-World, for the species did not exist anywhere in America before the
-arrival of Europeans.
-
-“The few pairs that escaped from their stables or were left to
-themselves in the pastures of the pampas three or four centuries ago,
-have multiplied so rapidly that to-day the number of cattle there is
-incalculable. More than two hundred thousand are slaughtered every
-year, and still the herds show no sign of diminution. The carnage has
-long been and still continues to be carried on for the sake of the
-hides, or at least this is in great part the purpose.”
-
-“They kill the cattle just for the hides?” asked Jules incredulously.
-“Then the meat isn’t good for anything?”
-
-“It is excellent, but they do not know what to do with it, there is so
-much. The population of the country not being sufficient to consume
-this enormous quantity of food, the cattle are slaughtered, the hides
-removed and cured, after which they can be kept indefinitely, and the
-flesh is left behind as a useless encumbrance. This is a waste much to
-be regretted, for with us meat is becoming scarcer every day, and our
-food problem would find a ready solution in the pampas cattle that now
-feed only carnivorous animals.
-
-“It is true that attempts are made to save a part of this copious
-supply of provision. The meat is cut into strips which are dried in the
-sun or salted or smoked, as a means of preservation; and in this state
-commerce carries them to all parts of the world. Unfortunately, I must
-acknowledge, this meat preserved by salting, smoking, or drying is not
-very palatable eating. Let us hope that improved methods of preserving
-will be introduced, and that some day South America will furnish Europe
-a rich supply of butcher’s meat.
-
-“In the present state of things the pampas cattle are hunted
-principally for their hides. I say hunted, for the cattle of the grassy
-plains of Buenos Aires may be called veritable game, since these
-animals do not fall, as do our cattle, under the blow of the butcher’s
-hammer, but are pursued in the open pasture and killed on the spot. The
-hunter is on horseback. For weapon he has the lasso; that is to say, a
-very long and tough leather thong, fastened at one end to the
-saddle-bow, armed at the other with balls of lead. When the hunted
-animal is within reach, the hunter throws the perfidious leather thong,
-which, whistling and following the course of the lead, encircles the
-animal’s horns and neck. At the touch of the spur the horse gallops
-off, putting forth all its strength, and drags the half-strangled ox
-after it. A plunge of the dagger in the heart finishes the beast. After
-removing the skin and rolling it up on the crupper of his horse, the
-cattle-hunter resumes his quest, leaving to the birds of prey the dead
-bodies whose bones, whitened by rain and sun, will serve him on future
-expeditions as material for building himself a hut.”
-
-“A hut of bones!” exclaimed Emile.
-
-“Yes, my friend. On those vast plains wood is lacking as well as
-stones. Therefore bones, piled one on top of another, serve the hunter
-of the pampas for building him a shelter, where he rests under a grass
-roof. The skull of an ox with long horns serves him as a seat by day
-and a pillow at night.”
-
-“It seems to me I shouldn’t sleep very well with my head between the
-two horns of an ox’s skull.”
-
-“The hardened hunter of the pampas sleeps on it as on feathers.”
-
-“And what do they do with all those hides that they get by hunting the
-ox?” asked Jules.
-
-“There is an extensive commerce in those hides. Ships bring them to us,
-well salted, so that they will keep. In our tanneries the salt is
-washed out, and then with oak-bark they are made into leather for boots
-and shoes.”
-
-“Then the leather of our shoes may come from some ox strangled by the
-lasso on the pampas?” Louis queried.
-
-“There is nothing impossible in that. I would not say positively that
-we are not wearing shoes made from the hide of a wild ox, for Buenos
-Aires supplies a considerable part of our deficiency in leather. It may
-be, on the other hand, that our shoes come simply from the domestic ox,
-whose hide is put to the same use as that of the South American
-bullock. You are at liberty to ascribe your footwear to either source.”
-
-“For my part,” Emile declared, “I choose the wild ox, and perhaps its
-body is now being used by some hunter for his hut.”
-
-“To finish the subject of tame cattle that have run wild, I will say a
-few words about the herds of Camargue. A little below Arles, about
-seven leagues from the sea, the Rhone forks and encloses between its
-two branches and the Mediterranean a large triangular plain. That is
-Camargue, a shifting tract subject to the action of both fresh and salt
-water, receiving the alluvial deposits of the river and the sands of
-the sea. There are three different regions to be distinguished in going
-from the riverbanks to the interior of the island, where there is a
-large pond known as the Vaccarès Pond. These regions comprise the
-cultivated territory, the pasture land, and the group of ponds. The
-first, running the length of the two outlets of the Rhone, is
-wonderfully fertile, being made so by the annual deposits of silt. Rich
-harvests gild these strips of land along the river, the current of
-which prevents the infiltration of salt from the sea. Going further,
-one comes to the salt marshes, and finally, from the center of the
-island to the sea, stretches the region of ponds. This last is merely
-dry land in the making, a plain in the process of formation, with the
-river constantly adding its accretions of soil and the sea forever
-washing them away.
-
-“In the portion devoted to pasturage roam thousands of bullocks that
-have reverted to the wild state, unprovided with shelter of any sort
-and free from all surveillance except such as is exercised by mounted
-keepers who, at long intervals, come and round up the unruly herds with
-the aid of a trident. Black, small, and stocky, with fierce eyes and
-menacing horns, they have resumed the primitive characteristics of the
-race. Bad luck to whoever should come and disturb them at their sport
-among the reeds. Only the herdsman, mounted on a fast horse and
-equipped with a trident for pricking the nostrils of the beasts, can
-control the wild herd. In one particular alone are we reminded that
-they are still man’s servants, victims destined for his
-slaughter-houses and sometimes also, alas, set apart for his
-entertainment in the barbaric bull-fight: on their shoulders the mark
-of the proprietor is branded with red-hot iron.
-
-“Over the same prairies gallop, heedless of bad weather and proud of
-their freedom, horses descended from those that the Arabs, once masters
-of the south of France, left in these regions. They are white in color,
-small, active, and skittish. Their mouth knows not the bit, nor their
-hoof the shoe. At harvest time they are led up from their
-pasture-ground to tread the threshing-floor and thresh the wheat. The
-work finished, they are set free again.
-
-“Of all our domestic animals the ox is certainly the most useful.
-During its lifetime it draws the cart in mountainous regions and works
-at the plow in the tillage of the fields; furthermore, the cow
-furnishes milk in abundance. Given over to the butcher, the animal
-becomes a source of manifold products, each part of its body having a
-value of its own. The flesh is highly nutritious; the skin is made into
-leather for harness and shoes; the hair furnishes stuffing for saddles;
-the tallow serves for making candles and soap; the bones, half
-calcined, give a kind of charcoal or bone-black used especially for
-refining sugar and making it perfectly white; this charcoal, after
-being thus used, is a very rich agricultural fertilizer; heated in
-water to a high temperature, the same bones yield the glue used by
-carpenters; the largest and thickest bones go to the turner’s shop,
-where they are manufactured into buttons and other small objects; the
-horns are fashioned by the maker of small-wares into snuff-boxes and
-powder-boxes; the blood is used concurrently with the bone-black in
-refining sugar; the intestines, cured, twisted, and dried, are made
-into strings for musical instruments; finally, the gall is frequently
-turned to account by dyers and cleaners in cleaning fabrics and
-partially restoring their original luster.
-
-“But this does not exhaust the list of the animal’s merits. Under man’s
-care, under the influence of climate, soil, and manner of living, the
-ox has become modified and has given us many different breeds that have
-adapted themselves to the most varied conditions of existence; one
-breed furnishing more work, another more meat, and still another more
-dairy food, according to our choice. Among the breeds scattered over
-France I will limit myself to the following.
-
-“A stocky body, large and strong head, short, thick horns, short and
-massive neck, powerful legs, bold appearance, quick walk, medium-sized
-and well-shaped body—these natural endowments make the Gascon breed one
-of the best for work. Its coat, generally brown or tawny, is always
-lighter along the back. The chief source of this breed is the
-department of Gers.
-
-“The Salers breed is originally from the department of Cantal. Its coat
-is bright red, often with white splashes on the rump and belly. The
-horns are large, smooth, black at the tips, of symmetrical shape, and
-pointing a little backward. Very rustic, sober, intelligent, vigorous,
-inured to toil, the Salers ox is an excellent worker. When fattened at
-the end of its toilsome service, it gives abundant, firm, and savory
-meat. The cow, if well fed, can furnish as much as twenty liters of
-milk a day.
-
-“The Breton breed stocks the five departments of ancient Brittany. It
-is characterized by smallness of body, readiness for work, and
-remarkable excellence of milk, which is rich in butter-fat. The cow’s
-coat is spotted with white and black in large splashes, and she has a
-black muzzle, slender horns, bright eyes, and determined gait. The ox,
-similarly spotted with black and white, has powerful and very pointed
-horns; but the peaceful beast never dreams of using its formidable
-weapons.
-
-“The Normandy breed furnishes animals of enormous size, little adapted
-to work, and hence reserved for the butcher. Some of these gigantic
-animals raised in the rich pastures of Normandy are said to have
-attained the weight of 1970 kilograms. In the Normandy ox the head is
-long and heavy, muzzle broad, the mouth deeply cut, the skin thick and
-hard, the hair close, sometimes red, sometimes brown, sometimes black
-and white. The horns are rather short and are borne well forward on the
-forehead. On an average the cow gives 3000 liters of milk a year.
-
-“The Garonne breed, occupying the basin of the Garonne River from
-Toulouse to Bordeaux, is likewise tall, corpulent, and almost as highly
-esteemed for butchering as the Normandy breed. Its coat is uniform in
-shade, resembling in color the yellow of wheat. The horns, which turn
-forward, are white all over; the edge of the eyelids and the nose are
-pale pink. In fact, the whole physiognomy of the animal has something
-remarkably peaceful about it.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXX
-
-MILK
-
-
-Mother Ambroisine had just milked the goat for breakfast. While Emile
-and Jules were crumbling their bread each in a cup of milk, foamy and
-still warm, Uncle Paul, who takes advantage of every occasion for
-enriching the intelligence of his young nephews with new ideas, thus
-began the conversation:
-
-“What a priceless resource we have in milk; what delicious breakfasts
-with this food so nourishing, so light, so appetizing! To judge by the
-reception you are giving it at this moment, you know well how to
-appreciate its value.”
-
-“For my part,” Emile declared, “I like milk better than anything else
-Mother Ambroisine can give us, especially when the bread is toasted a
-little over the coals.”
-
-“I don’t need anything of that sort,” said Jules, “to make the milk
-first-rate.”
-
-“Since you like milk so much, you shall learn something about it; then
-your breakfast will give you a double benefit, food for the body and
-food for the mind.
-
-“Let us speak first of a property the effects of which you have
-doubtless seen more than once without paying attention to them. At
-times the milk turns, as they say; in other words, it curdles. Why is
-that? You do not know. I will tell you.
-
-“Here is a glass of milk just as it came from the goat. It is of
-irreproachable fluidity without the slightest trace of curdling. I
-squeeze into it a drop of lemon juice, one only, and stir the liquid.
-Immediately a great change is effected: one part of the milk clots and
-rises to the surface in thick white flakes; another part remains
-liquid, but loses its whiteness and becomes like slightly turbid water.
-If I let the glass stand for some time, the curd collects at the
-surface and floats on a clear liquid. With a drop of lemon juice I have
-just made the milk turn quickly.”
-
-Emile examined with lively interest the contents of the glass thus
-speedily transformed. His uncle, whom nothing escapes, perceived it.
-“What is it you are looking at so attentively?” he asked.
-
-“Your experiment,” Emile answered, “reminds me of what happened to my
-milk one day at breakfast. To my toasted bread, which Jules turns up
-his nose at, I wanted to add something still better. I had an orange
-and I took it into my head to squeeze the juice into my cup of milk,
-thinking to make a delicious drink of the mixture. Who was the fool
-that time? It was giddy Emile. The milk instantly curdled, just like
-this when you squeezed the lemon juice into it. Trying to improve my
-cup of milk, I only made it so that I had to throw it all away, it had
-gone so bad.”
-
-“I wish I could have seen the face Emile made,” said Jules, “when he
-saw the result of his improvement.”
-
-“I was much surprised, I admit,” Emile rejoined, “to find how two
-things, orange juice and milk, each excellent by itself, could make
-such a nasty drink when mixed.”
-
-“In future, my friends, you will know that anything sour makes milk
-turn. What I brought about with lemon juice you effected with orange,
-which contains, though in small quantity and masked by the sweet flavor
-of the fruit, exactly the same ingredient that gives the lemon its sour
-taste.
-
-“The juice of sorrel leaves, that of green grapes, and of unripe fruits
-in general, vinegar, and in fact everything with a similar taste, make
-milk turn at once. These sour-tasting substances are called acids.
-Vinegar is an acid; that which gives its sourness to the lemon is
-another; green grapes contain a third; sorrel leaves furnish a fourth.
-The number of acids is very considerable. All those that we need to
-know anything about have this same sharp flavor, sometimes stronger,
-sometimes weaker; all, in short, make milk curdle just as I showed you
-with the acid of the lemon.
-
-“From theory let us turn to practice. Cleanliness in everything is of
-the first importance, but in the care of milk especially must one be
-scrupulous in this particular. The vessels for holding it and keeping
-it any length of time must be carefully and thoroughly cleaned as often
-as they are used, if one would avoid the risk of its turning. Suppose a
-few drops of old milk or some remnants of any kind of food are left in
-a pot, tucked away where they are hard to get at: these impurities soon
-turn sour, especially in warm weather, and the milk, finding an acid
-substance in the vessel, quickly spoils and curdles. How often the milk
-itself is blamed for this accident when want of cleanliness is the sole
-cause!
-
-“Milk contains three principal substances, namely: cream, or fatty
-matter from which butter is made; casein, or curds, used for making
-cheese; and, finally, a substance with a slightly sweet taste called
-sugar of milk. These three ingredients taken away, hardly anything is
-left but water. To separate these three, one proceeds as follows:
-
-“Left standing in a cool place and exposed to the air, milk becomes
-covered, sooner or later, according to the season, with a thick oily
-layer that takes the name of cream. This is the material from which
-butter is made. It rises to the surface unaided and separates when
-simply exposed to the air. It is removed with a skimmer.
-
-“What is left is skimmed milk, of the same whiteness, the same
-appearance, as the original milk, but deprived of its fatty matter.
-Into this skimmed milk let us pour a few drops of some acid, lemon
-juice for example. The milk turns and thick white flakes are formed.
-Those flakes are the curd, the casein, in short the material of which
-cheese is composed.
-
-“After the casein has been removed there remains nothing but a
-transparent liquid that might be taken for water slightly tinted with
-yellow. This liquid is called whey. It contains little besides water
-with a small quantity of sugar of milk which gives it a slightly sweet
-taste. It is especially in Switzerland that sugar of milk is obtained
-on a large scale by the evaporation of the liquid that remains after
-removing the cream and curds from the milk. In spite of its name this
-substance has nothing in common with ordinary sugar, the white
-loaf-sugar we use; it is a dull-white substance, rather hard, crunching
-under the teeth, and of a slightly sugary taste. It is used only in
-pharmacy.
-
-“Cream and casein constitute the nutritive ingredients of milk, and
-determine its food value. The milk that is richest in these
-constituents is sheep’s milk, next comes goats’ milk, and last of all
-cows’ milk. Although of little value to us, sugar of milk claims our
-attention for a moment on account of the change it undergoes to the
-great detriment of the milk itself. Little by little, especially when
-exposed to the heat of summer, this sugary matter sours and becomes an
-acid. That is what makes milk sour if kept too long. Of course when
-this sourness shows itself the milk soon curdles. Coagulation takes
-place as if an acid had been added to the milk. Hence, to keep milk for
-some time and prevent its turning sour of its own accord, this
-acidulation of the sugar of milk must be delayed. This is done by
-taking care to boil the milk a little every day.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXXI
-
-BUTTER
-
-
-“From milk,” continued Uncle Paul, “we make butter and cheese. I have
-just explained to you in a few words how the ingredients composing
-them—that is, cream and casein—are obtained in their separate forms;
-but further details are now called for, and I will give them to you,
-beginning with butter.
-
-“The material necessary for making butter is cream, a fatty substance
-disseminated through the milk in excessively fine and almost invisible
-particles. When milk is left undisturbed in a cool place and exposed to
-the air, these particles of fat rise to the surface little by little
-and collect there in a layer of cream. An example taken from things
-familiar to you will explain the cause of this spontaneous separation.
-
-“Oil, you know, cannot in any way be made to dissolve in water. If a
-mixture of the two liquids is well shaken, the oil divides into an
-infinity of tiny globules uniformly distributed, and the whole takes on
-a whitish tint that looks something like milk. But this condition is
-only temporary. If you stop heating or shaking the mixture, the oil,
-the lighter part, comes to the surface, globule by globule, and soon
-the two liquids are completely separated, the oil on top, the water at
-the bottom. If a little gum were added to the water to make it sticky,
-the separation of the oil would be less easily effected and the mixture
-would retain its milky appearance for a longer time; nevertheless the
-two liquids would always end by separating.
-
-“The fatty matter composing butter behaves in the same way as the oil
-of our experiment. It is not dissolved by the milk; it is simply
-divided into very minute particles that are held in place by a liquid
-thickened with casein, just as water thickened with gum holds for a
-long time the tiny drops of oil. Left undisturbed long enough, these
-oily particles free themselves and rise to the surface.”
-
-“Cream rises to the top of milk,” observed Jules, “just as oil that has
-been shaken up with water rises to the surface; only the separation is
-slower on account of the casein that thickens the liquid.”
-
-“That is the secret of this curious separation. Milk is placed in large
-earthen nappies, smaller at the bottom than at the top, and thus a
-large surface is exposed to the cooling action of the air, which
-hastens the separation of the cream. The full nappy is put in a cool
-and very quiet place. In summer half a day is long enough for the
-rising of the cream; in winter it takes at least twenty-four hours.
-When the separation is finished, the cream is removed with a skimmer or
-a large almost flat spoon.
-
-“Cream is yellowish white, oily to the touch on account of its greasy
-matter, and sweet and very pleasant to the taste, having the flavor of
-both fresh butter and cheese. It is most delicious eating.”
-
-“We know that,” Emile assented, “from those capital sandwiches Mother
-Ambroisine makes for us with cream on feast days.”
-
-“That delicacy,” remarked his uncle, “cannot be allowed every day, for
-the cream is needed for butter for the family.”
-
-“Once I helped Mother Ambroisine work the little butter machine, a kind
-of small cask called a churn. Why do we have to thump so long to get
-the butter?”
-
-“That is what I am going to explain to you. In cream the particles of
-butter are simply grouped side by side, without forming a united body.
-Besides, a layer of moisture, coming from the whey, isolates them and
-prevents their uniting. To combine all these particles into a compact
-mass of butter, it is necessary to squeeze out the milk and knead them
-together. This is accomplished by prolonged beating.
-
-“The implement used is called a churn. The simplest consists of a kind
-of small cask larger at the bottom than at the top. The cover is
-pierced with an opening through which runs a rod carrying a perforated
-wooden disc on the end inside the churn. After the cream has been
-poured into the churn, the operator takes the rod in both hands and
-vigorously raises it and plunges it down in alternate strokes, thus
-causing the terminal disc to rise and fall in the creamy mass. By this
-prolonged beating the fatty particles unite and become butter.
-Sometimes the churn is made of a small cask in which turns by means of
-a crank an axle bearing perforated wings or blades which beat the cream
-in their rotation.
-
-“Some precautions must be taken to carry this delicate operation
-through successfully. During the heat of summer churning should be done
-only in the morning and in a cool place. It is even well to set the
-churn in a tub of cold water. If this is neglected the butter may turn
-sour in the process of churning. In winter, on the contrary, the churn
-should be kept a little warm by wrapping it in warmed cloths and
-working it near the fire. Cold hardens the fatty particles and prevents
-their uniting. If nothing is done to raise the temperature enough to
-soften them they will be slow in turning to butter and the operation
-will be long.
-
-“As soon as all the fatty particles are well stuck together the butter
-is made. It is taken out of the churn and put into cold water, in which
-it is kneaded over and over again with a large wooden spoon to press
-out the whey with which it is impregnated.
-
-“If the butter is to be eaten soon, it suffices to keep it in water
-that is changed every day for the sake of freshness and to prevent the
-butter’s souring. But if it is to be kept for a long time, more
-thorough-going means of preservation are necessary. The most simple
-method consists in kneading it with kitchen salt, well dried in the
-oven and reduced to fine powder. After salting, the butter is put in
-earthen jars and the surface covered with a layer of salt.
-
-“Another way to keep butter is to melt it. I must tell you, to begin
-with, that butter, however carefully prepared it may be, always
-contains a certain quantity of whey and casein. These are the
-substances that, changing later by contact with the air, make butter
-sour and finally rancid. If the fatty matter were all by itself, if it
-could be completely rid of the casein and whey that go with it, we
-could keep it much longer. This result is attained by melting.
-
-“The butter is placed in a kettle over a bright fire that is even and
-moderate. Melting soon begins. The moisture of the whey is evaporated,
-this process being hastened by stirring the melted mass. A part of the
-casein rises to the surface and forms a scum which is removed; another
-part collects at the bottom of the kettle. When the melted butter looks
-like oil and when a drop of it thrown on the coals takes fire without
-crackling, thus proving that it is quite free from moisture, the
-operation is finished. The kettle is taken off the fire, the liquid is
-left standing a few minutes to give the casein time to settle at the
-bottom, and finally the butter is poured by spoonfuls into earthen jars
-carefully dried in the oven. These jars should be of small capacity and
-narrow opening, so as to prevent as much as possible the access of air,
-the cause of change in all our food substances. It is advisable to put
-on top of the butter, as soon as it hardens, a layer of salt, as is
-done with salted butter. Finally the jars are closed with parchment,
-which is tied on with string.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXXII
-
-RENNET
-
-
-“In the making of cheese the first step is to cause the milk to curdle.
-Lemon juice, vinegar, or any other acid would bring about this result,
-as we have already seen; but it is customary to make use of another and
-much more efficacious liquid called rennet. Let us learn first what
-this liquid consists of. That calls for certain explanations apparently
-foreign to our subject, but nevertheless leading directly to it.
-
-“Among our domestic animals three, the ox, goat and sheep, are
-remarkable for their horns and split hoofs. All three have a way of
-eating very different from that of other kinds of animals. The dog, for
-example, after masticating its food sufficiently, swallows it once for
-all and passes it into a single digestive cavity called the stomach,
-where it becomes a fluid mass suitable for nutrition. On the contrary,
-the goat, sheep, and ox chew and swallow the same food twice; at two
-different times, with a rather long interval between, the same fodder
-is subjected to mastication and passed down the throat.
-
-“Animals are characterized as ‘ruminant’ that, after chewing their food
-once and letting it pass into the digestive cavity, bring it back into
-the mouth for a more complete trituration. The ox, goat, and sheep are
-ruminants. Instead of only one stomach they have four, that is to say
-four membranous pouches where the alimentary matter passes from one to
-another before being converted into a sort of nutritive soup.
-
-“The first of these pouches is called the paunch. It is a spacious
-cavity in which the animal accumulates the fodder that has been hastily
-browsed and not thoroughly chewed. Its inside surface is thickly
-covered with short flat filaments that give it the appearance of coarse
-velvet.
-
-“Watch the ox and sheep in the pasture. They crop the grass without
-stopping, without a moment’s rest; they chew very slightly, very
-hastily, and then swallow; one mouthful does not wait on another. It is
-the time for filling the paunch without losing a bite by prolonged
-chewing. Later, in the hours of repose, there will be leisure for
-bringing up again the food swallowed and for grinding it to the proper
-fineness.
-
-“This receptacle known as the paunch having received its due supply of
-fodder, the animal retires to a quiet spot, lies down in a comfortable
-position, and takes up at its ease, for hours at a time, the work of
-chewing. This second stage in the preparation of the food under the
-millstone of the teeth is called rumination. The ox is then seen
-patiently chewing, with an air of gentle satisfaction, without taking
-anything from outside. What is it eating thus, when there is apparently
-no fodder within reach? It is re-eating what has been stored up in the
-paunch, and which now comes up from the bottom of the stomach in little
-mouthfuls. Then the motion of the jaws ceases, the mouthful is
-swallowed, and immediately after something round and bulging is seen
-making its way upward under the skin of the neck. It is a fresh
-alimentary ball coming up from the paunch to the mouth to be chewed.
-Ball by ball, the mass of fodder accumulated in the paunch comes back
-thus to be ground by the teeth to the right degree of fineness and then
-swallowed for good.”
-
-“That’s a clever way to eat,” was Emile’s comment. “In order not to
-lose a moment of their time in the pasture, the sheep, goat, and ox do
-not stop to do their chewing there: they browse without stopping and
-store up a good supply. Then, lying down comfortably in the shade, they
-bring up again the contents of the paunch and grind it at their ease,
-little by little.”
-
-“The second stomachic cavity is called the reticulum, its inner surface
-presenting a reticulated appearance, with an arrangement of dentate and
-laminate folds forming, all together, an elaborate network of meshes.
-This curious formation cannot fail to strike you if you look for a
-moment at a piece of tripe, one of our countless articles of food; for
-what is called tripe is nothing but the collective stomach of the ox.”
-
-“I remember having seen that beautiful honeycomb network,” said Jules,
-“and the coarse velvet lining of the paunch. They were very
-interesting.”
-
-“The office of the honeycomb is to receive, in small portions, the food
-already somewhat softened in the paunch, and to mold it into balls,
-which rise one at a time to the ruminant’s mouth. That in fact is where
-the alimentary balls are made that we see gliding from below upward,
-under the skin of the neck of the ruminating ox.
-
-“After being re-chewed to the proper fineness the food does not return
-to the paunch, where it would mix with material not yet similarly
-prepared; it goes to the third stomach, or manyplies, so named on
-account of its numerous and wide parallel folds, having some
-resemblance in arrangement to the leaves of a book.
-
-“From the manyplies the food passes finally to a fourth and last
-stomach called the rennet-bag. After this come the intestines. Now
-guess whence we get that significant name of rennet, knowing as you do
-what I have especially in mind in this connection?”
-
-“You have in mind,” answered Jules, “a certain liquid, rennet, that
-makes milk curdle quickly. The word rennet, or runnet, as it is also
-written, must be connected with the verb run, in the sense of dropping,
-coagulating. Can it be, then, that from this fourth stomach or
-rennet-bag of ruminants we get the liquid rennet that is used for
-curdling milk?”
-
-“You have said it yourself,” declared Uncle Paul, much pleased at his
-nephew’s clear explanation of the matter. “It is from the fourth
-stomach of ruminant animals that we obtain rennet, the most efficacious
-substance known for curdling milk.
-
-“Preferably it is the rennet-bag of a young calf that is selected; then
-it is cleaned carefully, salted, and dried. Thus treated, it keeps a
-long time. When it is required for use, a piece as large as your two
-fingers is cut off and put to soak in a glass of water or whey. The
-next morning two or three spoonfuls of this liquid, called rennet, is
-added to each liter of milk. In a very short time, if kept moderately
-warm, the milk turns to a mass of fresh cheese.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXXIII
-
-CHEESE
-
-
-“The chief constituent of cheese is casein coagulated by the action of
-rennet. But, prepared from casein alone, cheese would be coarse and
-almost tasteless, and when dry would become as hard as stone. To give
-tenderness and flavor to the paste-like mass, the cream is commonly
-retained in milk used for making cheese. The casein furnishes the main
-substance of the product, while the cream contributes what might be
-called the seasoning.
-
-“Hence we have two principal varieties of cheese: one, prepared with
-milk from which the cream has been taken, contains only casein; the
-second, made from unskimmed milk, contains both casein and cream. The
-first kind, known as cottage cheese, white cheese, or, more
-expressively, skim-milk cheese, has little food value and is not made
-for its own sake, but in order to put to some use the milk that has
-already served to make butter. The second kind, called cream cheese, is
-what commonly appears on our tables in different varieties and varying
-appearance, according to the quality of the milk and the mode of
-preparation.
-
-“To make cheese still more unctuous and to give it a finer flavor, we
-do not always content ourselves with using milk in its natural state;
-to the cream that it naturally contains we often add some more from
-milk skimmed expressly for the purpose. The cheeses thus enriched with
-fatty matter are the most delicate of all. Again, we occasionally adopt
-a middle course, using neither natural milk nor entirely creamless
-milk, but of two equal parts of milk we keep one just as it is and skim
-the other, mixing them together afterward.
-
-“By adding or withdrawing, in varying quantities, this fatty
-constituent of the milk, we obtain as many different varieties of
-cheese. If also we bear in mind that sheep’s milk has not exactly the
-same properties as goats’ milk, nor goats’ milk the same properties as
-cows’ milk; if we remember, further, that the same animal’s milk varies
-according to the nature of its feed and the care given to the herd; and
-if, finally, we take into account the different methods of manufacture,
-of one sort in one place, of another sort somewhere else, we shall
-understand how numerous may be and in fact are the various kinds of
-cheese.”
-
-“For my part,” Jules interposed, “I know at least half a dozen kinds.
-There is Roquefort, a pasty cheese streaked with blue and of a sharp
-flavor; Gruyère, riddled with large round holes and yellowish in color,
-and clear like quartz; Auvergne, as large as a big millstone and not
-very delicate in flavor; Brie, in thin, wide cakes that sweat a kind of
-ill-smelling cream; Mont d’Or, packed with a little straw in a round
-deal box; and a lot of others that I can’t remember now.”
-
-“Jules has just told us the best known kinds of cheese; I will add a
-few words on the way they are made.
-
-“Fresh cheeses are those that are eaten soon after being made. They are
-white and soft. They are made of either skimmed or unskimmed milk, and
-in the latter case they are incomparably better. When the rennet has
-brought about coagulation, the curdled milk is poured into round molds
-of tin or glazed earthenware, with holes in the bottom for the escape
-of the whey contained in the curdled mass. As soon as this has drained
-enough and is sufficiently firm, the cheese is done, and it is taken
-from the mold ready for the table without any other preparation.”
-
-“That’s the cheese I like best,” Emile declared. “It’s the kind we
-spread on slices of bread to make those delicious sandwiches.”
-
-“That is very true, but it has the fault of not keeping long. In a few
-days it turns sour and uneatable. All the other cheeses would do the
-same, all would spoil and become sour if certain measures were not
-taken to prevent this. These measures consist in the use of salt, which
-is rubbed and sprinkled on the outside of the cheese, and sometimes
-even mixed with the curd itself. All cheeses, then, that are to be kept
-a long time receive more or less salt, while fresh cheese is not salted
-at all.
-
-“Of these salted cheeses some are soft, some hard. That of Brie, named
-from the district where the best is made, in the department of
-Seine-et-Marne, is a large and thin soft cake, made of sheep’s milk. It
-is salted on both sides with finely powdered salt, and is left to soak
-for two or three days in the salted liquid that drips from it. The
-salting finished, the cheeses are packed in a cask with alternate
-layers of straw, and are left alone for several months. Then there
-starts a kind of fermentation, which is the beginning of putrefaction,
-and which develops new qualities. The curd loses its odor and insipid
-taste of milk-food, to acquire the heightened flavor and strong smell
-of cheese; its mass becomes more oily, even partially fluid, and
-changes under the rind to a liquid pap of creamy appearance. This work
-of modification is called refining. It has gone just far enough when
-the liquid part under the rind is of a pleasant taste. The cheeses are
-then taken out of the cask and are ready for eating.
-
-“This first example shows us that cheese acquires its peculiar
-qualities through an incipient deterioration. Before this putrefaction
-sets in the cheese is simply curd, sweetish, insipid, without
-pronounced odor; after this process it has the odor, the taste, in fact
-all that is required to make it really cheese. But the putrefaction,
-once started artificially, does not stop where we should like it to
-stop. It goes on all the time, slowly indeed if we take some
-precautions, and the cheese, smelling more and more, and tasting
-stronger and stronger, ends by becoming a mass of rottenness. All
-cheese, therefore, when it gets too old, is sure at last to go bad; it
-spoils by continuing to excess the kind of deterioration that in the
-beginning gave it precisely the qualities desired.
-
-“From its appetizing flavor and fine texture Roquefort is the king of
-cheeses, the prominent feature in any well-appointed dessert. Its
-renown extends all over the world.”
-
-“That’s the cheese that is so strong and takes so much bread to go with
-it?” asked Emile.
-
-“Yes, that is it. Its pronounced flavor and its blue streaks make it
-easy to recognize. It is made in a village of Aveyron called Roquefort,
-and is obtained from sheep’s milk only, the best of all milk on account
-of its richness in casein and butter.”
-
-“Brie cheese also,” observed Louis, “is made of sheep’s milk; yet it
-doesn’t compare in quality with Roquefort.”
-
-“That marked difference shows us how much the method of making it
-determines the quality of cheese. You have just seen what pains are
-taken with Brie cheese; now see how much care is given to Roquefort.
-
-“The cakes of curd are not thin in this case, but as thick as they are
-wide. They are stored for months in grottoes hollowed in the heart of a
-rock, either by nature or by man, in the environs of the village of
-Roquefort. These grottoes are remarkable for the strong currents of air
-that circulate through them, and for the coolness of their temperature.
-During the summer, while the thermometer outside marks thirty degrees,
-[6] it shows but five inside the cheese caves. The difference is that
-between the heat of an oppressive summer and the cold of a severe
-winter. It is in the depths of these cold caves that the cheeses
-acquire their peculiar qualities. The only care given them is an
-occasional rubbing with salt and a scraping of their surface to remove
-whatever moldiness may have developed. This moldiness even gets into
-the inside by degrees, where it forms blue veins. But that is in no way
-detrimental; on the contrary, the flavor of the cheese gains by the
-formation of this mold, which is merely another kind of rotting that
-adds its energies to those of the usual change undergone by cheese.
-Hence the makers are not content with letting nature produce these
-signs of moldiness: they hasten the process by mixing with the fresh
-curd a little powdered moldy bread. The cheese would be better if left
-to its own working, but this addition accelerates the result, and
-to-day, alas, in the making of Roquefort, as in so many other branches
-of industry, there is greater eagerness for quick results than for
-excellence.
-
-“The cheese called Auvergne is made in the mountains of Cantal. Cows’
-milk is used. When the curd has formed, the dairyman, legs and arms
-bare, mounts a table and tramples and compresses with feet and hands
-the mass of fresh cheese to squeeze out the whey. The curd is then
-separated, mixed with pounded salt, and pressed in large round molds
-containing up to fifty kilograms. These enormous cheeses are finally
-left in cellars to the action of fermentation, which perfects them.
-
-“Gruyère cheese owes its name to a little village in the canton of
-Fribourg in Switzerland. In the Vosges, Jura, and Ain a great quantity
-of this cheese is made. This too is made of cows’ milk. The milk, after
-a third of its cream has been skimmed off, is slightly warmed in large
-kettles over a brisk fire. Then the rennet is poured in. When the curd
-has formed, it is separated as much as possible by being stirred in the
-kettle with a wide paddle, after which it is warmed still further.
-Finally the curd is collected, placed in a mold, and subjected to
-strong pressure. The cheese thus produced is next rubbed several times
-with salt, and then stored in a cellar and left undisturbed for two or
-three months. It is during its stay in the cellar that the holes or
-eyes characteristic of Gruyère cheese make their appearance; they are
-due to bubbles of gas released from the fermenting substance of the
-cheese. You will notice in the making of this kind of cheese the
-application of heat. The milk is warmed over the fire just before the
-rennet is added, which is not done in the other kinds. Hence Gruyère
-cheese is called cooked cheese.
-
-“If kept too long, all cheeses are sooner or later invaded, first on
-the outside and then within, by mold, yellowish white at first, then
-blue or greenish, and finally brick red. At the same time the cheese
-decays and acquires a repulsive odor and a taste so acrid as to make
-the lips sore. The cheese is then a mere mass of putrefaction to be
-thrown on the dung-hill. The rate of decay is proportioned to the
-softness of the cheese and its permeability by the air. Therefore, in
-order that it may keep well, it must be carefully dried and also
-reduced to a compact mass by strong pressure. That is why so much force
-is exerted in pressing the large cheeses of Gruyère and Auvergne in
-their molds. But it is nothing in comparison with certain cheeses,
-called Dutch cheeses, which are noted for their extraordinary lasting
-qualities. They become so hard and dry that before they can be eaten
-they sometimes have to be broken up with a hammer and put to soften
-again in a cloth wet with white wine.”
-
-“Those very hard cheeses, as solid as a rock, can’t be of much use,”
-commented Emile.
-
-“That is where you are mistaken. Cooks use this hard cheese to season
-certain dishes, after grating it to a powder. It is also in favor on
-shipboard as a valuable article of food on long voyages. The Dutch
-cheese is round like a ball, and has a reddish rind. It takes its name
-from the country where it is made.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXXIV
-
-THE PIG
-
-
-“There is every reason to believe that the domestic pig is descended
-from one or another of the numerous kinds of wild boar scattered over
-Asia—perhaps even from several of them. But the Asiatic wild boar bears
-so close a resemblance in shape and habits to the European that it will
-suffice for me to acquaint you with the latter in order to give you a
-correct idea of the former, and thus show you what the pig must have
-been in its primitive state.
-
-“Though very numerous in early times throughout the forests of France,
-wild boars are from day to day diminishing in number with us, and are
-destined sooner or later to disappear altogether, as they have already
-disappeared from England, where they have now been exterminated to the
-last one, as is the case also with wolves. This complete extermination
-is explained by the situation of the country. England is entirely
-surrounded by the sea. If then the wolf and boar, hunted down as two
-undesirable neighbors, are at last entirely destroyed, the two species
-are forever annihilated in the island, since the sea interposes an
-impassable barrier against new arrivals.”
-
-“That is perfectly clear,” assented Emile. “As soon as the last wolf
-and boar have been killed, the English, protected by the sea that
-surrounds them, are rid of these animals once for all.”
-
-“If we could only rid ourselves of wolves like that!” Louis exclaimed.
-“Gladly would I see the skin of the last one stuffed with straw and
-paraded from farm to farm. I will say nothing of the boar, as I don’t
-know its manner of living.”
-
-“The wild boar is also a formidable foe, not to flocks, but to
-cultivated fields, where it does great damage; besides, it is a brutal
-beast, rather dangerous to meet in the depths of a forest. In size and
-shape it closely resembles the common pig, the chief difference being
-in the boar’s coarse, blackish-red coat; its dorsal bristles, stiff and
-strong and standing up in anger in a horrible looking mane; its head,
-longer and more curved; its ears, smaller, more erect, and very mobile;
-its thick and shorter legs; and, finally, the great stockiness of the
-body as a whole. The eyes are small but not without expression,
-becoming quite fiery and ferocious in anger. The eye-teeth of each jaw
-project in a threatening manner beyond the lips, the lower ones being
-very long, with a backward curve, sharp edges, and pointed ends, the
-upper ones shorter and rubbing against the first in such a manner as to
-serve them as whetstones. From this peculiar function the upper tusks
-are in fact sometimes likened to grindstones and hence go by the name
-of grinders, while the lower tusks, terrible in combat, are called
-defenders. With its powerful muzzle or snout the boar strikes and
-overthrows an opponent; with its sharp tusks it rips open and
-disembowels. The female, or sow, has no tusks, but her bite is most
-formidable; she accompanies it with a ferocious gnashing of the teeth
-and an infuriated stamping of the hoofs that would alone prove fatal to
-the trampled adversary. The cry of both consists in an obstreperous
-snort, a signal of alarm and surprise; but except in case of danger the
-brute is usually silent.
-
-“The wild boar is fond of vast forests, in which it seeks the darkest
-and most retired spots where it will not be disturbed by man’s
-presence. In the daytime it lies in its retreat or lair amid the
-thickest of brushwood and bushes. In the neighborhood there is
-generally some sort of muddy pool where it wallows with delight. Toward
-nightfall it leaves its retreat in search of food. With its snout it
-plows the ground, always in a straight line, to unearth fleshy roots;
-it gathers the fruit fallen to the ground, the kernels of cereals, also
-chestnuts, beech-nuts, hazel-nuts, and acorns, especially the last, its
-favorite food. But a vegetable diet fails to satisfy its voracity. If
-it knows of a fish-pond, it plows up the banks to get the eels lurking
-in the mud; if it knows of a rabbit-burrow, it ransacks it by hollowing
-out a deep ditch and upturning stones with its powerful snout. It
-surprises the partridge on its nest and devours mother and brood; it
-crunches young rabbits in their snug retreat; it lays hold of young
-fawns in their sleep. Finally, if live prey is wanting, it gorges
-itself with carrion. The whole night is passed in predatory raids of
-this sort, after which the beast regains its lair at the dawn of day.
-
-“A wild sow’s litter numbers from three to eight little ones, sometimes
-called grice. They are white, with tawny or brown stripes running
-lengthwise. At the age of six months their hair becomes darker, a sort
-of dirty gray, and they outgrow the name of grice. When two years old
-their tusks begin to be dangerous, and at an age ranging from three to
-five years the animal attains its maximum size and strength and is
-entitled to the name of wild boar. After this, until twenty-five or
-thirty, the ordinary limit of its life, it is called an old boar or an
-old hermit, on account of the isolation in which it lives. Then the
-tusks become blunted and turn in toward the eyes.
-
-“Boar-hunting is not without its dangers. If the boar finds itself hard
-pressed by the pack of hounds pursuing it, the animal takes refuge in
-some dense thicket of brambles and holly, and forces a passage through
-the thorny rampart where no other would dare to penetrate. Through the
-opening thus made rush the dogs, vying with one another in ardor and in
-barking. There are eight, twelve, fifteen of them; no matter, the boar
-awaits with firmness its numerous assailants. Backing up against a
-gnarled stump which protects it in the rear, it sharpens its tusks and
-works its drivelling jaws. Its mane stands erect on head and back; its
-little eyes, inflamed with fury, resemble two glowing coals. The
-boldest dogs rush to seize it by the ears; it disperses them with a few
-vigorous blows from its snout, dealt with startling promptness. Some
-fall back with belly split open, from which the entrails protrude and
-catch on the bushes; others have a leg broken, a shoulder dislocated,
-or at least one or two flesh wounds. The dying stretch their legs in
-the last convulsions of agony, the wounded howl with pain, the least
-crippled beat a hasty retreat. But reinforcements arrive, bringing back
-the fugitives to the charge. Then, from the midst of the thicket, an
-indescribable uproar is heard. To the cries of the pack, howling,
-barking, and growling in various keys, and to the wild boar’s grunts of
-rage, are added the crashing sound of underbrush broken in the fierce
-scrimmage and the shrill notes of the magpies that have flown in all
-haste to the scene of tumult and from the surrounding tree-tops noisily
-discuss the event. Finally the boar emerges from the thicket and, drunk
-with carnage, takes its turn as pursuer. Woe then to the inexperienced
-hunter who loses his presence of mind or whose shot misses its mark: he
-might forfeit his life for his unwariness and lack of skill. But let us
-hope that a bullet, cleverly aimed between the beast’s eyes, will put
-an end to a battle that has already cost the lives of the best dogs in
-the pack.”
-
-“I see that this is no tame rabbit-hunt,” said Jules. “If any one
-should come within reach of the fierce brute that the dogs are
-worrying, he would not, as they say, have much of a picnic.”
-
-“Nevertheless there are men of dauntless courage who go straight for
-the furious beast and plunge their hunting knife into its heart. But
-usually the thing is attended with less peril and with no such
-atrocious ripping-up of the dogs, a sport for the grand seigneurs.
-Ambushed in a safe place, the hunter awaits the boar and gives it a
-couple of bullets as it passes; and that is the end of it. If the
-attack is less spectacular, at least it spares the life of the dog and
-does not endanger man’s.”
-
-“Then I give it preference,” Jules declared, “to that in which a whole
-pack might be killed. I don’t like that slaughter of dogs, with the
-boar’s tusks ripping them open there in the underbrush.”
-
-“And what do they do with the beast after they have killed him?” asked
-Louis.
-
-“It is a piece of game,” replied Uncle Paul, “that surpasses anything
-else to be found in our woods. Such a boar, old hermit-boar, as we call
-him, may weigh as much as two hundred kilograms. That is enough for a
-feast, I should hope, and all the more so as the flesh is excellent.
-The piece of honor is the head, the famous boar’s head.
-
-“The Asiatic wild boar, from which the domestic pig descends, does not
-differ from ours in its habits; it is, like ours, a ferocious, coarse,
-vigorous, bold, voracious animal, a formidable creature to encounter in
-the dark woods. How has this intractable beast become the pig that we
-raise? By what care, what gentle treatment, has it been made to lose
-its ancient savagery? To these questions there is no further answer
-than in the case of the dog and the ox. After centuries and centuries
-of domestication, the first steps in this process of redemption from
-the wild state have become lost in oblivion.
-
-“Despite all its improvement the pig still remains a coarse animal,
-resembling the wild boar in more than one trait. Like the latter, it
-feeds on anything and everything; and even more than the latter is it
-addicted to gluttony. The perils attending its wild state no longer
-existing, it devotes itself unreservedly to the gratification of its
-voracious appetite. The pig is a fat-factory: it lives only to eat,
-digest, and fatten. Its gluttony extends even to the devouring of
-kitchen refuse, greasy dishwater, nasty leavings, garbage; in fact
-everything even to excrementitious matter. Ill effects can result from
-its nosing about in filth to satisfy its gluttony, since it is thus
-liable to a horrible disease of which we will speak later. Not
-satisfied with acorns and other viands that go to fill its trough, it
-turns up the earth with its snout in quest of roots, worms, and fat
-larvæ. It is always either sleeping, stretched out on its side in the
-full enjoyment of digestion, or rooting in the ground in the hope of
-some chance additional tidbit, however small. In the cultivated fields,
-in prairies and grass-lands, devastation makes rapid progress with such
-a miner tearing up the ground. To check this mania for excavating, the
-end of the snout is pierced with two holes through each of which is
-passed a piece of iron wire, which is then bent into a ring.”
-
-“Oh, I know,” cried Jules. “I have often seen little rings of iron wire
-at the end of a pig’s snout. I didn’t know what they were for, but now
-I see. If the pig wants to dig, the iron wire is pressed against the
-earth and bruises the raw flesh through which it passes; and the pain
-forces the animal to stop.”
-
-“Yes, that is the part played by the rings fixed in the end of the
-snout.”
-
-“And we see pigs, too, with a kind of large wooden triangle around the
-neck,” Emile put in.
-
-“As the pig is not very tractable and pays little heed to the drover’s
-voice, it is customary, when a number of these animals are taken to the
-fields, to put around their neck a large triangular wooden collar,
-which prevents their getting through hedges and overrunning the
-neighboring cultivated fields.
-
-“The pig’s gluttony is proverbial. But let us beware of reproaching it
-for this. Its voracious appetite transmutes into savory meat and fat
-quantities of refuse that none of the other domestic animals would eat,
-and that would be wasted but for its intervention; out of otherwise
-worthless scraps its strong stomach, which turns at nothing, makes
-those delectable articles of food so much enjoyed by all of you when
-they appear in the form of sausages and sausage-cakes. Let us not
-reproach it, either, for its passionate love of mud, in which it
-wallows to reduce its temperature. In that it simply inherits the
-habits of its ancestor, the wild boar, which also delights in the
-luxury of a mud-bath. Besides, it is more our fault than the pig’s
-taste. The pig likes a cold bath; it submits with every indication of
-satisfaction to being washed and brushed by its keeper. So fond is it
-of cleanliness that it alone of all the domestic animals hesitates to
-soil its bed with its excrement. Why then does the word pig suggest the
-idea of dirtiness? Here we are to blame, more often than not. Let the
-pig be given clean water for its bath, and it will turn its back on the
-foul mud that it contents itself with for want of something better; let
-its premises be kept clean, and the poor animal will be highly
-delighted, much preferring a sanitary straw bed to a filthy hole. By
-these attentions to cleanliness the animal will be the gainer, and we
-shall profit likewise.
-
-“In lifetime the pig is of no use to us, unless it be in hunting for
-truffles, an exercise in which it excels by reason of the extraordinary
-development of its nose and the keenness of its scent. Yet even for
-this service the dog is preferred, as being better fitted for exploring
-uneven ground, more active, and more intelligent. It is after its death
-that the pig pays us for the care bestowed upon it. Let us be present
-at this event, a festive occasion for the family.
-
-“Fattened for a long time on potatoes, excellent for making flesh, and
-on acorns, which give firmness and savor to the meat, the porker can
-hardly stand on its short legs. It sleeps and digests in a reclining
-posture, lying lazily on its side. From its neck hang three and four
-great cushions of fat; under its belly are seen ponderous masses of
-lard; the rump is well rounded, the back padded with fat. The animal is
-ripe for the knife. At the break of day it is aroused from its sweet
-repose and sacrificed in the midst of piercing cries of protest against
-so cruel a fate. With torches of burning straw the bristles are burnt
-off, after which the body is well scraped and washed, then opened and
-cut up. Now the housewife proceeds to the work of salting and curing
-this rich store of provision. Every member of the family comes to her
-aid. Here, over a big fire, in a resplendent copper kettle, the lard is
-tried out and poured into pots, where it hardens and turns as white as
-snow. Yonder the black puddings are hardening in boiling water. Over
-there some one is busily plying a big chopping-knife, mincing the meat
-that is to go into sausages, which will be wound in a long garland
-about two laths and hung from the ceiling opposite the fireplace to get
-a good drying. In still another place the ham is being made ready for
-wrapping in linen and hanging in a corner under the chimney mantel to
-assure its preservation. On a screen are spread the most important
-parts of the animal, the chine and flanks, covered with a layer of
-salt. And the housewife’s heart is filled with content as she views her
-cupboards and larders stored with provisions for a year to come.
-
-“Now, these provisions, on which the housekeeper’s hopes are based,
-would speedily decay and become unfit for food without the use of salt.
-A piece of meat left to itself soon gives out a bad smell and undergoes
-putrefaction. The higher the temperature and the damper the air, the
-more rapid the rate of decay. That is why the approach of winter and as
-far as possible a dry time are chosen for the annual pig-killing. Salt
-in liberal quantities is used for preserving the meat, lard, and fat.
-Salted meat dries without becoming tainted, and keeps for a long time,
-though not indefinitely, since sooner or later it turns rancid.
-Nevertheless salting is the best way to preserve meat.
-
-“Another process, discovered long ago and very efficacious, consists in
-exposing the meat to the action of smoke from burning wood. That is why
-salted hams are hung in the chimney-corner. But on the farm it usually
-happens that too little attention is paid to this method of curing: it
-is deemed sufficient to place the hams within reach of the smoke from
-the fireplace without any covering to protect them. Hence the meat
-becomes covered with soot, black juices permeate it, and putrefaction
-sets in. To avoid this mishap it is enough to wrap the hams in two
-layers of linen, which sifts the smoke, keeps out the soot, and admits
-only the vapors really adapted to the preservation of the meat without
-blackening it and giving it a disagreeable taste.
-
-“In various countries, Germany and England for example, smoking is
-practised on a large scale for curing beef as well as pork. Three or
-four rooms with low ceilings and communicating with one another by
-means of openings are connected with a fireplace at some distance, in
-which oak shavings and aromatic plants are burnt. The largest pieces
-are hung in the first room on poles or iron hooks, the medium-sized
-pieces are hung in the second, and the smallest are relegated to the
-last room. The smoke, on account of the comparative remoteness of the
-fireplace, is cold when it reaches the first compartment, where it acts
-with full force on the large pieces of meat, the hardest to penetrate.
-Thence it passes to the second compartment, and finally to the third,
-thus in proportion to its loss of strength encountering pieces less
-resistant to its action. As food, smoked meat is preferable to salted:
-it tastes better and is easier to digest.
-
-“Smoking is also applied to fish. You have a well-known example in the
-herring. This fish, as it comes from the grocer, is sometimes silvery
-white, sometimes golden red. In the first state he calls it white
-herring; in the second, red herring. The difference is in the way it is
-cured. Directly after being caught, the herrings are opened, cleaned,
-washed, and put to soak in brine, that is to say in a strong solution
-of salt. About fifteen hours later they are taken out, put to drip, and
-finally packed in casks in regular layers. The product of this process
-is the white herring, so named because the fish, simply salted and put
-up in casks, keeps its beautiful silvery color. Smoking produces the
-so-called red herring, recognizable from its golden-yellow tint and
-smoky smell. The fresh fish are first of all strongly salted by being
-left thirty hours in the brine; then they are attached to small twigs
-or branches passed through the gills, after which they are hung in a
-sort of fireplace where green wood is burnt, which gives out little
-flame and torrents of smoke. It is here that the herring takes on its
-red color and its slightly smoky smell.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXXV
-
-PIG’S MEASLES
-
-
-Jean had come to market to sell his pig; Mathieu, on his part, had gone
-thither to buy one. Jean’s animal pleased him. After some talk in which
-all sorts of finesse were employed on the part of the seller to
-heighten the value of his merchandise, on the part of the buyer to
-lower it, they came to an agreement on the price and shook hands to
-bind the bargain.
-
-But before taking out his purse and counting out the crowns Mathieu
-wished, as was his right, to make sure that the pig was sound. A man
-was called whose business it was to decide such questions. He took the
-animal by the legs and threw it over on its side. Whereas Jean and
-Mathieu stood in some awe of the animal, he made no ceremony about
-forcing a stick, as a sort of lever, between the pig’s teeth and prying
-the jaws apart. Then he plunged his hand in between those terrible jaws
-and felt about with his fingers to the right, to the left, and
-especially under the tongue. Meanwhile the pig was giving forth
-heartbreaking cries, and with raucous grunts all its companions in the
-market voiced their sympathy in its distress. The whole square was in
-an uproar. The ordeal over, the animal was let loose and immediately
-everything became quiet again. The pig was found to be in good
-condition.
-
-Emile was passing at the time of this performance. What are they doing
-to that poor animal with the big stick thrust between its jaws? Why are
-they feeling in its mouth? Couldn’t they leave the creature in peace
-instead of making it squeal worse than if they were slaughtering it?
-Such were the questions that passed through Emile’s mind as he found
-himself almost seized with terror at the piercing cries of the animal
-and the chorus of alarmed grunts from its companions. In the evening
-the conversation turned upon this event.
-
-“The man who felt with his hand in the pig’s mouth,” Uncle Paul
-explained, “while the stick kept the formidable jaws apart, had a
-definite purpose, which was to assure himself that the animal was free
-from measles. For the pig is subject to a strange disease thus named,
-which makes its flesh unwholesome and even dangerous. When the animal
-is afflicted with this malady, its flesh is filled with a multitude of
-round white granules from the size of a pinhead to that of a pea, or
-larger; these granules are called hydatids. Their number is sometimes
-so great that in a piece of fat no larger than the five fingers of my
-hand they can be counted by hundreds. To determine whether a pig is
-thus affected, it is of course out of the question to explore the flesh
-of the living body. What do they do then? They feel the soft parts
-accessible to the hand—the walls of the mouth and especially the under
-side of the tongue, a favorite haunt of the hydatids. If hard granules
-are felt by the fingers, the pig is affected and its market value
-greatly lowered; if no such granules are found, the animal is healthy
-and will bring its full price. That is the reason of the operation that
-so puzzled Emile this morning in the market. The man that was feeling
-of the animal’s tongue was an inspector. His office is to examine all
-pigs offered for sale and to determine from the feeling of the tongue
-whether the animal has the measles. Hence he is commonly called a
-tongue-tester, a word that will now explain itself to you.”
-
-“I see very well,” Jules interposed, “how the word came to be used in
-connection with the examination of the pig’s tongue, but I don’t yet in
-the least understand how those hard white granules that the
-tongue-tester looks for, those hydatids as you call them, can make the
-meat unwholesome and dangerous.”
-
-“You will soon see. Each of those granules is a lodge, a cell, a little
-chamber if you like, in which lives a sort of worm, richly fed by the
-pig’s animal substance. You are familiar with the worm that inhabits
-the juicy pulp of cherries, with the one that gnaws the kernel of nuts,
-with the one that makes its home in the heart of the pear and apple,
-and with countless others in fact that I told you about when we were on
-the subject of harmful insects. Well, fruit is not the only thing to
-harbor such troublesome guests; every animal has its parasites to
-devour it while it is still alive. The pig in its turn has a great
-many, especially when its gluttonous habits lead it to feed on
-excrement. One of these parasites is the worm I have mentioned.
-
-“It is the most curious creature one could possibly imagine. Picture to
-yourselves a little bladder full of liquid as clear as water; on this
-bladder a very short and wrinkled neck; finally, at the extremity of
-this neck a round head bearing on the sides four suckers and at the end
-thirty-two hooks arranged in the shape of a crown in a double ring.
-That is the worm, the hydatid. Each one is enclosed in a sort of little
-pouch, a firm and semi-transparent cell which derives its substance
-from the flesh of the pig itself. Commonly the tiny creature is
-entirely hidden in its snug retreat; at other times, through an opening
-in the pouch, it stretches its neck and pushes its head out a little,
-doubtless to feed on the adjacent fluid matter by means of its four
-suckers. As to the little bladder forming the other part of the worm,
-it never leaves its cell, the cavity of which it fills exactly. Hence
-the animal never changes its place.”
-
-“That must be a very dull sort of life,” was Emile’s comment. “No
-exercise for the little worm except occasionally sticking its head out
-of the bag that holds it, and then drawing it in again and shutting the
-door. Is this bag very large?”
-
-“There are different-sized ones, according to the worm’s degree of
-development, for as it grows its dwelling also becomes larger. The
-usual shape of these cells is that of a small egg, the greatest
-dimension of which might be as much as two centimeters, and the
-smallest five or six millimeters.
-
-“Hydatids live in the flesh of a live pig; they live there by thousands
-and thousands, in such multitudes that sometimes not a piece of fat the
-size of a nut could be found free from these little parasites. Each
-one, snugly ensconced in its retreat, its strongly-walled cell, grows
-in peace, sheltered from all attack, and makes predatory raids in the
-immediate vicinity with its crown of hooked claws and its four
-suckers.”
-
-“What a miserable fate is the pig’s,” Emile exclaimed, “to be eaten up
-alive like that, all full of the ravenous vermin and unable to get rid
-of them! The poor animal must soon succumb.”
-
-“Not exactly. It wastes away, it is true, but it resists for a long
-time, being very tenacious of life.”
-
-“I can’t think without horror,” said Jules, “of the terrible itching
-such an army of vermin must cause, biting and boring into the
-creature’s flesh all over its body.”
-
-“Your horror would redouble if you knew that this vermin only awaits a
-favorable opportunity to emigrate to our bodies even, and to ravage us
-in our turn.”
-
-“What! Those horrid pig worms have designs on us?”
-
-“And designs, alas, too often accomplished, if we are not careful. That
-is what we are now about to consider.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXXVI
-
-A PERSISTENT PARASITE
-
-
-“Many members of the animal kingdom change their form in the course of
-their existence, and with the new structure adopt also a new way of
-living. Thus the caterpillar and the butterfly, for example, are in
-reality the same creature, but very different in shape and habits. The
-caterpillar drags itself heavily over the plant, gnawing the foliage;
-the butterfly, furnished with light and graceful wings, flies from
-flower to flower, imbibing a sugary liquor from each with its long
-proboscis. The cherry worm grows in the midst of the juice that feeds
-it; after attaining full size it falls from the tree with the damaged
-fruit and hastens to bury itself in the ground, there to undergo its
-transformation. Next spring it comes forth in the form of an elegant
-fly that lives on honey from the flowers and never again touches a
-cherry except to deposit its eggs therein, one by one. In the same way,
-again, the nut worm, after finishing its growth, bores a hole in the
-firm shell, emerges from its fortress, and buries itself for a time in
-the soil. There it becomes a beetle with a long proboscis, the
-so-called nut weevil, which leaves its subterranean retreat in the
-spring and takes up its quarters on the foliage of a nut tree, where it
-lays its eggs in the growing nuts.
-
-“All species of animal life that change their shape act in this way. In
-the first half of their existence, under their initial form, they have
-certain habits and certain dwelling-places; in the second half, under
-their final form, they have habits and abodes that are quite different.
-
-“Well, the worm that makes its home in the white cells or granules of
-the diseased pig’s flesh is also subject to transformation. It has to
-change its form, but before doing so it must first change its abode.
-The cherry worm would never turn into a fly so long as it remained in
-the cherry; the nut weevil would never become a beetle if it continued
-to abide in the nut. Both must emigrate and hollow out a home for
-themselves in the earth if they would cease to be worms and become a
-fly in one case, a beetle in the other. In like manner, the parasites
-of the diseased pig would never attain their final form in the flesh
-that they inhabit; it is absolutely necessary for them to change their
-abode in order that the transformation may take place. But as they
-cannot leave their cells of their own accord and transport themselves
-to their new abode, which is difficult of access, as you will see, they
-wait patiently, whole years if necessary, for a favorable opportunity
-to emigrate.”
-
-“Where then is this new abode?” asked Jules.
-
-“In us, my poor child, in us exclusively. The cherry worm and the nut
-weevil are content, for the purposes of their metamorphosis, with a
-hole in the sand; but the odious worm of the diseased pig must have the
-human body for its new home—nothing else.”
-
-“It can’t be that the abominable creature really gets into us.”
-
-“It gets there very easily, and it is we ourselves who unconsciously
-open the door to the perfidious enemy. Some day or other the pig is
-killed for our nourishment. Its four legs become hams, other parts are
-made into sausages, its fat is tried out and stored away. All these
-various pork products are well salted, carefully dried, or sometimes
-smoked; nothing is neglected that will assure long keeping. Now in all
-this thorough treatment, this salting and trying and smoking, what do
-you think becomes of the little worms inhabiting the diseased flesh?”
-
-“They must die, surely.”
-
-“That is where you are mistaken. They are very tenacious of life, the
-accursed things! The strongest saline solution leaves them unaffected;
-but if some or even a great many should perish, there would always be
-plenty of survivors, for they are numerous beyond counting. Behold,
-then, our food infected with the vermin that at the first opportunity
-will invade our bodies. You eat a sausage the size of your finger, or a
-slice of ham, and the thing is done: with the appetizing mouthful you
-have just swallowed the horrible creature. Henceforth the enemy is with
-you, at home; it will grow, develop, be transformed, and cause no end
-of mischief.”
-
-“But the stomach will digest it, I hope, as it would digest anything
-else; and the hateful intruder will perish.”
-
-“Not at all. The digestive energies of the stomach make no impression
-on it. It passes through quite untouched, protected perhaps by its
-resistant shell, and goes farther on to establish itself definitively
-in the intestines.
-
-“And now all the conditions are the best possible for the worm. The
-situation is quiet, disturbance from without is not to be apprehended,
-and the best food in our power to furnish is supplied in abundance.
-With its double ring of hooks, each one shaped like the fluke of an
-anchor, the organism fastens itself to the wall of its abode and
-straightway begins to develop. On its arrival it was a very short and
-wrinkled little worm, terminating at one end in a small round head, at
-the other in a spacious bladder. In a short time it will turn into a
-sort of ribbon that may attain the enormous length of four or five
-meters.”
-
-“Oh, how horrible!” cried Louis. “Can it be that we serve as a dwelling
-for such a guest?”
-
-“Say rather for a number of such guests, since as a rule they are not
-found singly. They are commonly called solitary worms, an improper
-term, as you see, since there are generally several of them together.
-Their real name is tænia, or tape-worm, from their ribbon-like form.
-
-“Imagine a narrow tape or band of a dull white color, a sort of ribbon
-of variable length that may measure as much as five meters; imagine
-this ribbon almost as small as a hair near the creature’s head, then
-broadening little by little and attaining the width of a centimeter;
-picture to yourself the entire length of the creature divided into
-sections or joints, some square, others oblong, placed end to end like
-the beads of a chaplet, or, better, like pumpkin seeds strung one after
-another, and you will have a sufficiently good idea of the tænia or
-tape-worm.
-
-“The number of these joints is sometimes as many as a thousand, and,
-what is more, new ones are always forming, for the tænia has the
-singular faculty of producing them indefinitely in a row, each one
-growing out of the preceding. All are full of eggs, detestable seed of
-the original malady in the pig, and then of the tape-worm in man. The
-terminal sections or joints, the oldest and ripest, become detached
-from time to time in chaplets and are expelled. Any pig nosing about in
-the excrement containing them is pretty sure to become infected from
-the eggs contained in these joints, for each one is the germ of a
-hydatid. These eggs will hatch in the animal’s intestines; and, as soon
-as hatched, the young worms, opening a passage for themselves here and
-there with their crown of hooks, will go and lodge wherever they
-please, some in the lean flesh, some in the fat, there to encase
-themselves in a resistant shell, a cell built out of the pig’s
-substance, and there they will await the moment favorable for their
-emigration to the human body.
-
-“These frequent losses in chaplets of discarded sections do not in the
-least impair the tape-worm’s vigor; new sections grow, and the
-frightful length of the creature is maintained. Were it to lose almost
-its entire length, that would in no wise trouble it; let only the head
-remain, firmly held in place by its hooks, and new joints will form
-until the worm is as long as ever. Until the head is got rid of there
-is no hope of deliverance. I could not describe to you, my children,
-the atrocious sufferings of a person afflicted with this formidable
-parasite so difficult to dislodge.”
-
-“You give us goose-flesh,” said Emile, “with that five-meters-long worm
-that keeps growing again, each time stronger than before, provided its
-head is left.”
-
-“It must need very serious precaution,” Louis remarked, “not to be
-attacked by the creature.”
-
-“The precaution is very simple. Since the tape-worm has its origin in
-the diseased pig, let us beware of all pork thus infected. This
-infection, as I told you, is recognizable in the white granules
-abounding in the flesh, each granule being the abode of a little worm,
-the first form of the tænia. Raw meats, such as ham and sausage, are
-the only ones to fear, because salting and drying leave, if not all, at
-least some of these worms alive. But meat perfectly cooked, either
-boiled or baked, is absolutely without any danger even if infested with
-a multitude of these little granules, because heat of a sufficient
-intensity kills whatever worms they contain.
-
-“The rule to follow, therefore, is plain: if a pig is diseased, it need
-not be summarily thrown away; its flesh, although of inferior quality,
-its lard and bacon, can very well be utilized, but care must be taken
-never to use any of this food without first thoroughly cooking it at a
-heat intense enough to destroy every dangerous germ. As for the pig
-itself, it can be kept from the measles by cleanliness, and especially
-by seeing that it eats no excrement. Every pig that wanders about and
-feeds on filth deposited along walls may find under its snout some
-pieces of tænia, swallow them with the dirty food, and thus become
-infected with hydatids.
-
-“To finish this subject, I will tell you of another tænia which in its
-tape-worm form inhabits the dog’s intestines, and in its bladder-like
-or hydatid stage has its home in the sheep’s brain. Grass defiled by
-the excrement of dogs affected with this tænia receives the eggs of the
-expelled ripened sections. A sheep comes to browse this grass, and in a
-few weeks a terrible disease shows itself in the poor animal. With wild
-eye, driveling mouth, and heavy head, the animal turns round and round,
-always the same way, and falls gasping on its side. Food no longer
-tempts it, the blade of grass stops on its bleeding lips. All its
-efforts to stand up are powerless; it keeps looking for a support,
-especially for its head, and if this support is lacking it falls after
-a few turns. This strange disease is called the staggers, from the
-animal’s tendency to turn and turn with staggering motions.
-
-“Now if we open the brain of a sheep that has died of the staggers, we
-invariably find in the cerebral substance one or more limpid bladders
-from the size of a pea to that of a hen’s egg.”
-
-“And these horrid worms in the bladder,” queried Jules, “no doubt
-destroy the brain matter, little by little.”
-
-“They grow at the expense of the brain.”
-
-“I can well believe then, that the sheep is unable to stand.”
-
-“Each of these little bladders is a tænia in its first stage of
-development, and comes from the germ sown by the severed link or joint
-that the dog ejects with its excrement. As indisputable proof of this,
-if lambs are made to swallow some of the tænia links ejected by the
-dog, these lambs soon show themselves to be seized with the staggers,
-and in their brains are found the bladder-like organisms that cause the
-disease. The germs contained in the severed pieces of the tænia must
-therefore hatch in the lamb’s intestines, and the worms thus brought
-into being must make their way, through a thousand obstacles, to the
-animal’s brain, the only part of its body adapted to the development of
-the parasite.”
-
-“Then it is in the brain that the little worms grow and become bladders
-as large as hens’ eggs?”
-
-“It is only there that they can flourish. But these bladder-shaped
-worms are only incomplete beings, comparable to the larvæ of insects;
-and as long as they remain in the sheep’s brain their final development
-will not be attained. To acquire their final form, to become tænias,
-tape-worms, these larvæ must pass into the dog’s intestines. A
-conclusive experiment shows it. If a dog is made to take with its food
-some vesicular worms from a sheep’s brain, the animal soon gives
-unequivocal signs of the presence of the tænia: its excrement contains
-chaplets more or less long of ripe joints. Furthermore, by sacrificing
-the dog so as to be able to decide the question more conclusively, one
-finds in the intestines the vesicular worms converted into veritable
-tænias or tape-worms. So the dog gives the sheep the germs that develop
-in the brain into vesicular worms; and the sheep gives the dog back
-these vesicular worms, which change into tape-worms in the intestines.”
-
-“But how,” asked Louis, “can the dog become infected with vesicular
-worms when they are not expressly given to it with its food, as an
-experiment?”
-
-“Nothing easier. The sheep affected with the staggers is slaughtered,
-and its head, the seat of the disease, is thrown away. The dog that
-finds it feasts on it.”
-
-“And there we have shepherd dogs attacked by tænia,” said Louis. “Their
-excrement will spread the staggers among the flock.”
-
-“We must, then,” concluded Uncle Paul, “as is recommended by those who
-have studied this subject experimentally in veterinary schools,
-exercise careful supervision over shepherd dogs and exclude from the
-flock those that are attacked with the tænia; finally, if the infection
-shows itself in the sheep, we must bury beyond the reach of any dog the
-heads of the slaughtered animals.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXXVII
-
-THE HORSE
-
-
-“Would you like to hear some eloquent words written about the horse
-several thousand years ago? I take them from the book of Job, the just
-man, whose admirable history is related in the Bible.”
-
-“It was Job wasn’t it,” asked Jules, “who was tried by the hand of God,
-lost his health, family, all his goods, and was reduced to such misery
-that, lying on a dung-hill, he scraped his boils and vermin with a
-potsherd? His faith in God gave him back his former prosperity.”
-
-“Yes, my friend. The just man whose faith in God even the direst
-misfortunes could not shake has left us these beautiful words on the
-horse:
-
-“‘Hast Thou given the horse strength? hast Thou clothed his neck with
-thunder? Canst Thou make him afraid as a grasshopper? The glory of his
-nostrils is terrible. He paweth in the valley, and rejoiceth in his
-strength: he goeth on to meet the armed men. He mocketh at fear, and is
-not affrighted; neither turneth he back from the sword. The quiver
-rattleth against him, the glittering spear and the shield. He
-swalloweth the ground with fierceness and rage: neither believeth he
-that it is the sound of the trumpet. He saith among the trumpets, Ha,
-ha; and he smelleth the battle afar off, the thunder of the captains,
-and the shouting.’
-
-“Thus spake Job in the ancient days while around his camel’s-skin tent
-bounded mares and colts under the shade of the palm trees. Now let us
-listen to our great historian of animals, Buffon, who, in his turn,
-draws in a few splendid phrases the portrait of the horse.
-
-“‘The noblest conquest man has ever made is that of this proud and
-spirited animal that shares with him the fatigues of war and the glory
-of battle. As intrepid as its master, the horse sees danger and shrinks
-not; it becomes accustomed to the clash of arms, loves it, seeks it,
-and is fired with the same ardor. It also shares his pleasure in the
-chase, in the tournament, and in racing. But, no less docile than
-courageous, it does not let its ardor run away with it; it knows how to
-control its impulses. Not only does it obey the hand that guides it,
-but it seems to consult that hand’s wishes; always responding to its
-touch, it quickens or slackens its pace, or stops altogether, compliant
-in its every act. It is a creature which renounces itself to exist only
-by the will of another; which by the promptness and precision of its
-movements expresses and executes that will; which feels as much as it
-is desired to and only renders what is asked; which surrenders itself
-unreservedly, refuses nothing, serves with all its strength, wears
-itself out, and even dies to obey the better.’ Thus Buffon expresses
-himself in regard to the horse.”
-
-“I like Job’s way of saying it a good deal better,” Jules declared.
-
-“I too,” his uncle assented. “To my mind, no one has said it better
-than the old author who lived in the land of palms. In a few sublimely
-energetic words he paints for us the character of the horse.”
-
-“I’m too young,” said Emile, “to have an opinion on such a lofty
-subject; at the same time I will confess, Uncle, that I get lost very
-easily in Buffon’s long sentences.”
-
-“In the form in which I have quoted them to you, do not call them long,
-for on your account I took the liberty to cut them up into separate
-clauses. In the author’s exact words the whole makes but one sentence.
-From beginning to end, the sonorous period does not give one a chance
-to take breath.”
-
-“All the same, in spite of the cutting, I still lose my way.”
-
-“Let us return then to your uncle’s simple manner of talking. The
-appearance of the horse denotes agility combined with strength. The
-body is powerful, the chest broad, the rump well rounded, the head
-somewhat heavy but sustained by strong neck and shoulders; the thighs
-and shoulders are muscular, legs slender, hocks vigorous and supple. A
-graceful mane falling on one side runs along the neck; the tail bears a
-thick growth of long hair which the animal uses to drive troublesome
-flies from its flanks. The eyes are large, set near the surface, and
-very expressive; the ears, remarkable for their mobility, point and
-open in any desired direction in order the better to catch the sound in
-their trumpet-shaped exterior. The nostrils are full and also very
-mobile; the upper lip projects and folds over to seize the food,
-arrange it in a convenient mouthful, and carry it to the teeth, just as
-a hand would. The whole surface of the skin, which is extremely
-sensitive, quivers and shakes at the slightest touch. Let us not forget
-a characteristic peculiar to the horse and other animals that most
-nearly resemble it, such as the zebra and donkey: on the forelegs, and
-sometimes the hind ones as well, there is a bare spot, hard as horn,
-and known as a callus.
-
-“The horse’s neigh or whinny, as it is called, varies according to the
-feelings expressed. The whinny of delight is rather long, rising little
-by little, and ending in a shrill note. At the same time the animal
-kicks out, but not violently or with any desire to do harm—merely as a
-sign of joy. To express desire the whinny is longer, ends on a lower
-key, and is not accompanied with any kicking movement. On these
-occasions the horse sometimes shows its teeth and seems to laugh. The
-neigh of anger is short and sharp. Vigorous kicks accompany it, the
-lips are distorted in a grimace, showing the teeth, and the ears lie
-close to the head and point backward. This last sign shows an intention
-to bite. The neigh of fear is pitched low and is hoarse and short. It
-seems to be produced chiefly by blowing through the nostrils, and
-slightly resembles the lion’s roar. The animal’s chief mode of defense,
-kicking, is sure to accompany it. Finally, the note of pain is a deep
-groan, becoming weaker and weaker, subsiding and then coming again with
-the alternate inspiration and expiration.”
-
-“So when the horse shows its big teeth and seems to laugh, it wants
-something,” Emile broke in.
-
-“Yes, my friend. It is hungry and tired, and it thinks of the repose of
-the stable, of the crib filled with hay, of the manger with its savory
-peck of oats. Perhaps it has heard the joyful neighing of its mates and
-wishes to join them. Horses that are most given to neighing with
-eagerness or desire are the best horses, the most spirited.”
-
-“And if they lay their ears back they want to bite?”
-
-“Yes, that is their way of giving notice that they are going to have
-revenge for some ill-treatment, by biting.
-
-“In our talk on the Auxiliaries, I have already told you of the
-remarkable structure of their teeth; in particular I showed you how the
-horse’s molars, or grinders, are arranged so as to grind the tough
-fodder like mill-stones. A very hard substance called enamel, capable
-of striking fire like flint, covers the teeth and extends into the
-underlying and less resistant mass of ivory, forming on the crown of
-each molar a number of sinuous folds. These hard folds constitute a
-kind of strong file which tears in pieces the blades of forage when the
-opposite molar is brought into play. Need I go over all this again?”
-
-“No, Uncle,” replied Jules; “we all remember how ivory wears away by
-degrees, but the folds of enamel cap this softer substance and keep the
-molars in a proper condition for crushing the food.”
-
-“Then I will continue by showing you how by examining a horse’s
-incisors we may learn the animal’s age. These incisors are six in
-number in each jaw. They are accompanied in the upper and often also in
-the lower jaw by two small canine teeth having the shape of pointed
-nipples. Beyond these, and until the row of molars begins, the jaw is
-toothless, and this part is called the bar.”
-
-“I know,” broke in Louis; “it is in the bar that the bit is placed with
-which the horse is guided.”
-
-“Let us return to the incisors. The two in the middle of the jaw are
-called the first or central incisors; the next two, one on the right
-and the other on the left of the first ones, are called the second
-incisors; finally, the two last, one on each side, are called the third
-incisors. Remember these names; they will save us the trouble of
-roundabout expressions.
-
-“A few days after birth the central incisors show themselves in each of
-the foal’s jaws. In one or two months the second incisors appear, and
-in six or eight months the third incisors pierce the gum. These are the
-first or milk teeth, as they are called. When the animal is between two
-and a half and three years old they fall out and are replaced by the
-second teeth, which make their appearance in the same order as the
-preceding ones: first the central incisors, then the second incisors,
-and lastly the third incisors. The three pairs succeed one another at
-intervals of about a year. I will add that the milk teeth are whiter
-and narrower than the others. You already see that by examining the
-incisors and noting whether they are first or second teeth we can tell
-the age of a young horse; but there are other distinctive marks which
-we must now learn.
-
-“Here is a picture of the longitudinal section of a horse’s incisor. In
-the lower part, or root, of the tooth is a cavity occupied by the nerve
-which gives sensitiveness to the tooth and which carries to it, in the
-blood, the materials for its growth and maintenance. The upper part, or
-crown, likewise contains a depression, which is called the pit or
-cavity of the crown, and is filled with blackish matter. A layer of
-enamel covers the outside of the tooth, folds over the crown, and
-extends into the cavity, the walls of which it lines. The rest of the
-tooth is composed of ivory.
-
-“From this structure you will see that the enamel, continuing
-uninterruptedly from the outside to the inside, forms a sharp ridge on
-the edges of the coronal cavity. But this condition does not last long
-and is found only in incisors of recent formation. In fact, by the
-grinding of the teeth one against another when the animal chews its
-forage, the edge of the enamel first crumbles, then wears off little by
-little, and finally disappears altogether, leaving the ivory exposed on
-the top of the crown. This friction always going on, the coronal cavity
-or pit becomes less and less deep until at last there is nothing of it
-left. The upper face of the crown is then flat instead of hollowed-out
-as it was at first. This gradual obliteration of the hollow or pit in
-the crown of the incisor, whether in the first or in the second set of
-teeth, furnishes a means of determining the horse’s age. I have just
-told you when the milk teeth make their appearance; I will now add what
-is to be said about their wearing down. The central incisors of the
-first set of teeth are worn down so that their crowns are flat in ten
-months, the second incisors in one year, and the third incisors in from
-fifteen months to two years. Let us next consider how the horse’s age
-may be determined at a later period.
-
-“I here show you a picture of the incisors of the lower jaw. What do
-you see that will help you to estimate the horse’s age?”
-
-“I see in the first place,” answered Jules, “that the teeth are not all
-of the same age. The two in the middle, the central incisors as you
-call them, are newer, since the cavities in their crowns are in good
-condition, with their sharp edges of enamel. The others are older;
-their crowns are blunted by friction; in fact, they are a good deal
-worn down.”
-
-“Are all six of the same cutting?”
-
-“Evidently not, for if they were, the middle incisors would show the
-most wear, as they come first; but exactly the opposite is the case.
-Since they are quite new and those on each side are already worn, they
-must belong to the second cutting.”
-
-“That is quite right. Now find the animal’s age.”
-
-“Let me think a moment. I have it. When the horse is between two and a
-half and three years old the shedding of the milk teeth begins. The
-first to be replaced are the central incisors. The jaw you show me has
-these teeth of the second set quite new. Consequently the horse is
-about three years old.”
-
-“The answer leaves nothing to be desired: the horse is in fact three
-years old. Now, Louis, what have you to say about this jaw that I next
-show you?”
-
-“Here, too, the teeth are of different sets, since the central incisors
-and those next to them are less worn than the others. Moreover, the
-second incisors are newer than the middle ones, as can be seen from
-their sharper edges. These second incisors are second teeth; so are the
-central incisors, which are a little worn because they appeared the
-preceding year. The third incisors, which show the most wear of all,
-are milk teeth.”
-
-“All that is correct. And the animal’s age?”
-
-“It must be four years old. At three the second set of central incisors
-has grown, and now at four come the incisors next to them.”
-
-“Your opinion is mine too: the horse is four years old. Now it is
-Emile’s turn. I will ask him to examine this third picture of a horse’s
-jaw, and I hope he will show his usual perspicacity.”
-
-“These teeth,” said Emile after some study, “are too large to be milk
-teeth. All six belong to the second set, and as the newest are the
-outside incisors the animal must be a year older than the preceding
-one; that is to say, five years.”
-
-“Very good, Emile,” applauded his uncle. “You have handled the case
-like a master. At five years the entire second set of incisors has
-pushed through and it is too late to learn anything by comparing teeth
-of first and second sets; henceforth the degree of wear in the
-different incisors is our sole guide. Thus at six years the coronal pit
-in the central incisors has entirely disappeared, while it is still
-plainly seen in the third incisors. Finally, at eight years these
-latter are worn down so that their crowns are smooth. It is then said
-that the horse no longer shows its age by its teeth. Nevertheless an
-expert can still detect, on the surface of the incisors as they become
-more and more worn, certain marks that enable him to estimate, at least
-pretty nearly, the age of the horse up to the twentieth year and
-beyond.”
-
-“That must be a difficult undertaking,” commented Jules.
-
-“Very difficult; therefore I will not dwell on it any longer.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXXVIII
-
-THE HORSE (Continued)
-
-
-“Now let us say a few words about the horse’s coat, the growth of hair
-that covers its body. This may be of uniform color or of two or more
-different colors. Coats of uniform color are the white, the black, and
-the chestnut. The two first do not need any explanation. A horse is
-chestnut when its coat is of a reddish or yellowish tint.
-
-“Among the composite coats, the following are distinguished. The horse
-is piebald if the coloring is in large splashes, some white, others
-black or red. It is flee-bitten gray if the coat is a mixture of white,
-black, and red, over the whole body, legs and all; but if the legs are
-black while the body presents a combination of the three tints, the
-horse is roan. Bay horses have a chestnut-colored coat, that is to say
-reddish or yellowish, with the legs, the mane, and the tail brown or
-black. The coat is dappled when it is thickly sprinkled with light
-spots on a darker background of uniform color. Dappled gray is common.
-It is dun when the color is yellowish with a brown stripe on the back,
-a peculiarity rather common in the donkey and mule. A number of other
-terms are used in describing a horse’s coat in detail. Thus the term
-white-foot is applied to the white marking sometimes found just above
-the hoof. A white spot in the middle of the forehead is called a blaze
-if it is round, a star if angular.
-
-“The horse’s mode of progress is called its gait, and may be either
-natural or artificial, depending on whether the animal is untrained or
-trained. The natural gaits are the walk, the trot, and the gallop. In
-the walk the legs move in what may be termed a diagonal sequence, as
-follows: the right fore leg, the left hind leg, the left fore leg, the
-right hind leg. If the horse is well formed the hind foot steps exactly
-into the track left by the fore foot on the same side.
-
-“In the trot the feet are lifted and put down two by two in diagonal
-pairs, the right fore foot with the left hind foot, and the left fore
-foot with the right hind foot. This gait is more rapid than the
-preceding, but is also harder for the rider as well as for the horse,
-because of the shock sustained when two feet strike the ground at the
-same time.
-
-“The gallop is of several kinds, the simplest and swiftest consisting
-of a succession of forward bounds. The two fore feet are lifted at the
-same time, then the two hind feet, which push the animal with a sudden
-spring. That is the racer’s gait.
-
-“Among the artificial gaits I will mention the amble, in which the legs
-move in pairs on the same side, the two left at the same time, then the
-two right, alternately. The horse thus maintains a sort of oscillation,
-furnishing a gentle and easy motion for the rider. The amble is,
-however, rapid, for as there is no support on the side of the two
-uplifted legs the animal keeps from falling only by the rapidity of its
-motion.
-
-“In galloping a horse covers ten meters a second, or at most fifteen
-when going at top speed. In trotting it covers from three to four
-meters, and in walking, from one to two.”
-
-“Let me reckon up what that would be in an hour,” Emile interposed. “I
-will take the highest figures.” With his pencil he wrote some figures
-on a piece of paper, and then said: “That would make, by the hour,
-thirteen leagues of four kilometers each for the horse at its fastest
-gallop; only three leagues for the horse when trotting; and a league
-and a half when walking.”
-
-“I must inform you, my friend,” rejoined his uncle, “that though a
-horse can keep up a trot for whole hours at a time, it is impossible
-for it to gallop even one hour without stopping. The speed that would
-give the enormous distance of thirteen leagues an hour lasts fifteen
-minutes at the most in racing, after which the animal is exhausted.
-Note in passing the superiority of the railway engine, the locomotive,
-in regard to rapidity. This speed of thirteen leagues an hour, which
-blows a horse in a quarter of an hour’s race, the locomotive keeps up
-and even exceeds as long as may be desired. No comparison, you see, is
-possible between the iron steed and the steed of flesh and blood.
-
-“Let us turn to the subject of the horse’s strength. A riding horse
-carries on an average from 100 to 175 kilograms at a slow gait. If the
-load is a rider of 80 kilograms, the horse can travel seven hours and
-cover ten leagues of four kilometers each. But its strength is much
-better employed if instead of carrying the weight on its back the
-animal draws it in a vehicle. Then an expenditure of energy represented
-by the weight of five kilograms is sufficient to move a load of 1000
-kilograms if the wheels of the vehicle run on a railway track. For the
-same load on a smooth, level road an expenditure of energy represented
-by 33 kilograms is needed; finally, if the road is paved with stone the
-required energy will be 70 kilograms. On an excellent road, stagecoach
-horses draw each a load of 800 kilograms and cover six leagues in two
-hours, after which they are replaced by others.
-
-“Let us compare these figures once more with those relating to the
-steam engine. A passenger locomotive draws with a speed of a dozen
-leagues an hour a train having a total weight of as much as 150,000
-kilograms. A freight locomotive draws at the rate of seven leagues an
-hour a total weight of 650,000 kilograms. More than 1300 horses would
-be needed to take the place of the first locomotive, and more than 2000
-for the second, if they were used to transport similar loads the same
-distance at the same rate of speed, using cars running on rails. How
-many more would be needed with wagons on ordinary roads, where the
-surface inequalities cause such waste of energy!
-
-“The domestication of the horse goes back to the first communities of
-the East. After the herd they must soon have had, first, the ass to
-carry the baggage of the nomadic tribe, then the horse, man’s valiant
-comrade in the chase and in war. What is still to be observed to-day
-shows us how easily this valuable animal submitted to man’s domination.
-The grassy plains of Tartary abound in wild horses, and probably the
-species originated in these Asiatic regions. The pampas of South
-America feed innumerable herds of them, mingled with the wild cattle
-that I have told you about. Both descend from domestic animals brought
-to the New World by Europeans. Each herd follows a leader of tried
-strength and courage. If danger arises, if there is menace from some
-ferocious wild beast, such as a wolf, panther, or jaguar, the horses
-crowd together and press against one another for their common defense.
-Their haughty look and their kicking are generally sufficient to put
-the aggressor to flight. But if the enemy charges them, counting on an
-easy prey, the leader of the herd rears and falls on the beast with all
-its weight, crushing the assailant with its fore hoofs; then with its
-powerful jaws seizes the shattered body and throws it to the colts,
-which finish it and caracole on its body.”
-
-“An animal that defends itself like that,” remarked Jules, “must be
-rather hard to tame into a docile servant.”
-
-“No, the difficulty is not, after all, very great. What happens to-day
-on the pampas when it is desired to master a wild horse is of a nature
-to show us how the ancient horse-tamers accomplished the same object. A
-herd of horses, skilfully turned aside from its feeding ground and
-surrounded little by little on all sides, is driven without suspecting
-the ruse into a large enclosure called a corral. There those of finest
-appearance are selected. Immediately a dexterous hand throws the lasso,
-the long leather thong weighted with balls of lead, which catches them
-round the neck and legs and prevents their moving. A halter is quickly
-put on the captive. A practised horseman wearing sharp spurs mounts the
-animal, the fettering lasso is removed by helpers, and there stands the
-animal, free, but trembling after its misadventure.”
-
-“Now the horseman had better look out,” said Jules.
-
-“Certainly, the first moment is not without danger. The indignant
-animal rears, kicks, bounds, and tries to roll on the ground to get rid
-of its burden; but the horseman masters this rage with the bleeding
-prick of the spur; he keeps his seat as if he were one with his mount.
-Then the gate of the enclosure is opened, and the horse darts out and
-gallops away at breakneck speed until utterly winded. This unbridled
-run suffices to tame the animal, after which the horseman rides it
-back, unresisting and already obedient to bit and spur, to the corral.
-Henceforth it can be left with the domesticated horses without fear of
-its trying to escape.
-
-“Horses are classed, according to the rearing and training they have
-received, in two chief groups—saddle horses and draft horses. The first
-serve as mounts for riders, the second draw loads in vehicles. Among
-saddle horses the most celebrated are the Arabian, remarkable for their
-mettle, intelligence, docility, fleetness of foot, and ability to
-endure long abstinence from food and drink. The Arab steed is
-medium-sized and has a delicate skin, small head, slender frame, a
-spirited bearing, finely modeled legs, stomach little developed, and
-small, polished, very hard hoofs.
-
-“Draft horses, whose function it is to draw heavy loads in wheeled
-vehicles at a walking pace, have quite opposite characteristics. They
-lack lightness and mettle, but patiently exert their strength, which is
-considerable, as might be inferred from their more massive build and
-from the great quantity of feed that their maintenance demands. They
-have a stout body, heavy walk, thick skin, large head, wide chest,
-broad rump, capacious stomach, strong legs, and hoofs of no delicate
-proportions. France possesses in the Boulogne breed the most highly
-prized of draft horses. This vigorous animal, usually dapple-gray,
-plays the laborious part of shaft-horse. Having its position next to
-the cart or wagon, it is placed between the two shafts. It is the one
-to pull the hardest on up-grades, the one that eases with its enormous
-weight the jolts on street pavements and checks the dangerous momentum
-of the vehicle on down-grades. Compare these two pictures that I show
-you here, and you can easily see in the first the horse made for speed;
-in the second, the horse intended for hard work.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXXIX
-
-THE ASS
-
-
-“Your uncle’s partiality, you have already been able to see, my
-friends, is for the weak, the ill-treated, the unfortunate. I did not
-try to eulogize the horse, the valiant animal commending itself
-sufficiently to our esteem without that; but very gladly will I
-enumerate the good qualities of the ass, sad victim of our brutality
-despite the service it renders us. To give my words more authority I
-will add Buffon’s testimony to my own.
-
-“‘The ass,’ says the illustrious historian of animals, ‘is not a
-degenerate horse, as many imagine; it is neither a foreigner nor an
-intruder nor a bastard; like all animals it has its family, its
-species, and its rank. Although its nobility is less illustrious, it is
-quite as good, quite as ancient, as that of the horse. Briefly, the ass
-is an ass, nothing more, nothing less.
-
-“‘This initial fact is of no slight importance. In considering the ass
-as a degenerate horse we are led to compare it with its assumed origin,
-and the comparison is not favorable to it: the long-eared donkey makes
-but a pitiful showing beside the brisk and noble courser. But as it is
-in reality a separate animal let us expect of it only the qualities of
-its species, the qualities of the ass, without depreciating the animal
-by comparisons with others that are stronger and better endowed. Do we
-despise rye because it is not so good as wheat? We thank Heaven for
-both, the first as the valued crop of the mountains, the second as that
-of the plains. Let us not, then, despise the ass because it is inferior
-to the horse. It possesses the good qualities of its species, and
-cannot possess others. We fail to recognize that the ass would be our
-foremost, our finest, our best made, our most distinguished domestic
-animal if there were no horse in the world. It is second instead of
-first, and for that reason seems as nothing to us. It is comparison
-that degrades it. We look at it and judge it, not on its own merits,
-but relatively to the horse. We forget that it has all the good
-qualities of its nature, all the gifts belonging to its species, and
-remember only the beauty and merits of the horse, which it would be
-impossible for the ass to possess.’
-
-“Buffon asserts that the nobility of the ass is as ancient as that of
-the horse. I will venture even further than the master and maintain
-that it is certainly more ancient in the sense that the ass was
-domesticated before the horse. It was the first to serve the Asiatic
-shepherds in their migration in quest of better pasturage. It carried
-the folded tent, the dairy utensils, the new-born lambs, the women and
-children. What animal did the ancient patriarchs ride? What did Abraham
-ride on his journey into Egypt? The ass, my friends, the peaceful ass.
-On nearly every page of Genesis the ass is mentioned; the horse does
-not appear there until Joseph’s time.”
-
-“The ancient origin of the ass could not have nobler credentials,” said
-Jules.
-
-“Why then, asks Buffon, such scorn for the ass, so good, patient,
-sober, useful? Should men scorn, even among animals, those that serve
-them well and at so little expense? We educate the horse, take care of
-it, teach it, train it; while the ass, left to the rough handling of
-the lowest servants or to the mischievous pranks of children, far from
-improving in quality, can only deteriorate. If it were not
-fundamentally of excellent character, it would lose all its virtues
-from the way in which it is treated. It is the laughing-stock and the
-drudge of boors who beat it, overload it, and wear it out without
-consideration.”
-
-“Oh, how many of these poor donkeys I have seen,” Jules exclaimed,
-“overwhelmed with their loads and beaten unmercifully because they
-hadn’t strength enough to go on!”
-
-“What can become of the poor animal thus degraded by bad treatment? An
-intractable, brutalized, bald-headed, mangy, weakened creature, object
-of pity for any one who has not a heart harder than stone. But let us
-consider the ass as the Orientals know how to raise it in all the
-comfort and content of careful home treatment. We shall find an animal
-of fine appearance, gentle looks, glossy coat, distinguished and
-spirited bearing, trotting briskly along the streets of the large
-towns, where it is habitually used as mount for going from one quarter
-to another. Its gait, without fatigue for the rider, makes it preferred
-to the horse; the greatest ladies, in making their calls, do not
-disdain its richly ornamented pack-saddle. The city of Cairo alone, in
-Egypt, uses some forty thousand of these graceful trotters. In such
-society would our shameful donkey dare to show itself? Ah! let us pity
-the poor creature: its wretched lot has made it what it is.”
-
-“I should willingly agree with the people of Cairo,” said Emile. “I
-should prefer the donkey for a mount. At any rate, if one gets a fall
-the danger is not so great.”
-
-“The donkey is just the mount for invalids, children, women, and old
-people; it is naturally gentle, as quiet as the horse is spirited,
-mettlesome, and impetuous. Since, by endowing it with a patience that
-is proof against everything and with a small size which makes a fall
-from its back not at all dangerous, Heaven has created the donkey
-expressly for you, show the good beast by your care that you are not
-forgetful of your servant.
-
-“The ass is patient; it suffers punishment and blows with constancy and
-perhaps with courage. This fine virtue is, as it were, written on its
-coat. You will often see on the donkey’s back a long black stripe and
-another shorter one crossing the first on the shoulders. The two dark
-bands form the image of the cross, divine symbol of resignation to
-suffering. I know very well that this peculiarity in the animal’s coat
-has not the least significance in itself; but still it is worthy of
-remark that the donkey, the innocent victim of our brutality, bears the
-cross on its back.
-
-“The ass is temperate in both the quantity and quality of its food. It
-is contented with the toughest and least palatable pasturage, which
-horses and other animals disdain to touch. Along the roadside it
-browses the prickly tops of thistles, branches of willows, shoots of
-hawthorn. If afterward it can roll on the grass a moment, it counts
-this as the very summit of earthly happiness. But it is very dainty
-about water: it will drink only the very clearest and from streams that
-it knows. It drinks as temperately as it eats, and does not plunge its
-nose into the water, from fear, as they say, of the reflection of its
-ears.”
-
-“That’s a funny sort of fear,” said Jules.
-
-“Therefore I don’t believe the saying is well founded. The ass is not
-so silly as to be frightened by the reflection of its ears. If it
-drinks merely with its lips, without plunging its nose into the water,
-it is because, like the cat, it fears getting wet. It does not, like
-the horse, wallow in mire and water; it shrinks from even wetting its
-feet, and will make a detour to avoid mud. Hence its legs are always
-dry and cleaner than a horse’s. Its aversion to wet explains
-sufficiently its manner of drinking, without attributing it to any
-silly fear of the reflection of the animal’s ears.”
-
-“Why do people speak of that fear, then?”
-
-“Simply for the malicious pleasure of adding one more example of
-stupidity to the donkey’s account. Is it not agreed that the
-unfortunate beast has every possible whimsicality? Has not its very
-name become the favorite term to denote stupidity? All this is pure
-calumny; far from being the idiot it is called, the ass is a cunning
-beast, prudent, full of circumspection, as is proved by the care it
-takes in not drinking except from known springs already tested by use.”
-
-“Why make such a fuss about drinking?” was Emile’s query.
-
-“Why? Alas, my friend, evil sometimes befalls us for not exercising the
-donkey’s prudence in the choice of our drinking-water. The unknown
-spring whence we draw water may be too cold, unwholesome, full of
-injurious substances. Better advised than we, the ass will put its lips
-only to water known by experience to be wholesome.”
-
-“And the ass is a hundred times right,” Jules declared.
-
-“If I dared to, I should blame the ass for the passion it has for
-rolling on the ground, sometimes, alas, without any thought of the load
-it carries. But is it really the animal’s fault? Since nobody takes the
-trouble to curry the ass, to relieve the itching of its skin, it rolls
-on the grass and seems thus to reproach its master for neglect. Let the
-curry-comb and the brush keep its back clean, and the donkey will cease
-trying to rub itself, all four legs in the air, against the prickly
-foliage of the thistles. It is the accumulation of dust and dirt that
-torments it, not parasites, for of all hairy animals the ass is the
-least subject to vermin. It never has lice, apparently on account of
-the hardness and dryness of its skin, which is in fact harder than that
-of most other quadrupeds. For the same reason it is much less sensitive
-than the horse to the whip and to the sting of flies.
-
-“When overloaded, it lies on its stomach and refuses to move,
-determined to let itself be beaten to death rather than get up. ‘Oh,
-the stubborn brute! Oh, the stupid ass!’ cries the master; and down
-comes the stick. Is it stubbornness on the animal’s part to refuse to
-work? Listen first to a short story. In the old days of the Roman
-Empire a man of profound wisdom, Epictetus, was a slave in the house of
-a brutal master. One day the latter beat him unmercifully with his
-cane. ‘Master,’ said Epictetus to him, ‘I warn you that if you keep
-that up you will break my leg and your slave will lose in value.’ The
-brute struck all the harder, and a bone broke. With sublime resignation
-the slave uttered no reproach except to say: ‘I told you you would
-break my leg.’
-
-“To return to the ass laden beyond its strength, if it could speak it
-would certainly express itself thus in imitation of the sage: ‘Master,
-I assure you very humbly the load you are putting on me overtaxes my
-strength and I cannot carry it.’ But the man inconsiderately continues
-augmenting the burden until at last the animal’s back bends under the
-weight. The donkey first inclines its head, lowers its ears, and then
-lies down. That is its way of saying, ‘I told you I couldn’t carry such
-a heavy load.’ Any one but a boor would hasten to lighten the load,
-instead of unmercifully beating the animal, and the donkey would get up
-as soon as the weight became suited to its strength.”
-
-“They won’t make the donkey any stronger by beating it,” was Jules’s
-comment.
-
-“And, what is more, they will turn a docile animal into an obstinate,
-ill-tempered one. In its early youth, before it knows the hardness of
-life, the donkey is gay, playful, full of pretty tricks; but with the
-sad experience of age, with crushing fatigue and ill-treatment, it
-becomes indocile, slow, obstinate, vindictive. Is not that, however,
-our fault? How many injuries has not the unfortunate beast to avenge,
-and what a host of good qualities must it not have to remain in the end
-as we find it? If the donkey harbored ill-will for blows received, its
-master would become an object of hatred and it would be constantly
-biting and kicking him. On the contrary, the animal becomes attached to
-him, scents him from a distance, distinguishes him from all other men,
-and can if necessary find him amid all the confusion of a fair or
-market.
-
-“With passable food and, above all, with good usage, the ass becomes
-the most submissive, faithful, and affectionate of companions. Let it
-be saddled or harnessed, loaded with pack-saddle, panniers, farm tools,
-or what not, it shirks no labor. If there is any fodder for it, it
-eats; if not, it crops the thistles by the side of the road; and if
-there are no thistles it goes hungry without letting its fast diminish
-in the least its good will. It is a philosophical beast, neither
-humiliated by bearing the poor man’s pack-saddle nor puffed up by the
-rich man’s elegant housings, and anxious only to do its duty everywhere
-and always.
-
-“The ass has good eyes, keen scent, and excellent ears. From the
-quickness of its hearing and the length of its ears the inference is
-drawn that the animal is timid. I am willing to assent to this, the ass
-never having earned a reputation for prowess or daring. Moreover, its
-quickness of hearing and length of ears are shared by many other
-animals that do not surpass it in courage, as, for example, the hare
-and the rabbit, which are even more richly endowed than the ass in
-respect to length of ears. Their weakness and defenselessness expose
-them to a thousand dangers and make their life a continual state of
-alarm. To be warned in time of peril and save themselves by speedy
-flight, their surest dependence is the excellence of their hearing,
-which is partly due to the enormous size of the external ear, movable
-in every direction so as to receive sounds from all sides.
-
-“Merely because the ass has the long ears indicative of timidity shall
-we charge the animal with poltroonery? That would be unfair, for if it
-does not court danger it at least knows how to face it when peaceful
-means of safety are out of the question. The horse is warlike, the ass
-prefers the gentle ways of peace and consents to the arbitrament of
-force only when no other course is possible; but then its courage rises
-to meet the danger. If in its wild state it is surprised by an
-assailant, it hastens to rejoin its companions of the pasture; and, all
-grouping together as do wild horses in their war tactics, they begin to
-kick and bite with such fury that the enemy decamps as quickly as
-possible, with jaw-bone fractured by a flying hoof.”
-
-“After such an exploit,” said Jules, “let no one tell me the donkey is
-a coward.”
-
-“I fancy,” put in Emile, “that after routing the enemy the donkeys do
-not fail to chorus a song of victory.”
-
-“It is not to be doubted that, to congratulate one another and to
-celebrate their triumph, the donkeys sound a few clarion notes, such as
-they so well know how to give. The horse neighs and the donkey brays,
-the latter cry being very loud, very prolonged, very disagreeable, and
-composed of a succession of discords ranging from sharp to grave and
-from grave to sharp.”
-
-“And the last notes,” added Emile, “are hoarser and gradually die
-away.”
-
-“I see Emile is well acquainted with the donkey’s voice. Let us go on
-to some of its other peculiarities. From time immemorial the ass has
-had the reputation of being stupid: its very name is synonymous with
-stupidity. There is a whole vocabulary of abusive epithets that we
-bestow on the ass, and these epithets nearly always allude to its
-stupidity. We call it a numbskull, a ninny, a jackass, a wooden-head,
-and I don’t know what all; and, as a crowning slander to the animal,
-the dunce of his class at school is made to wear a cap with donkey’s
-ears. Never has calumny been more flagrant. The donkey a dunce? By no
-means! Is it not the donkey that, with a prudence worthy of imitation,
-refuses to drink from unknown springs? Does it not, when lost in the
-crowd at market, know how to find its master almost as easily as the
-dog, and does it not begin to bray with joy at sight of him? But there
-is something better than this to prove its intelligence. Recall to mind
-the wagoner’s long team of horses on the highway. There are four, six,
-eight of them, sturdily tugging at the enormous load. Between the two
-shafts, the most arduous position of all, is the massive shaft-horse,
-while at the head of the team proudly marches a donkey, harnessed very
-lightly. What is this little creature doing at the head of those robust
-companions? First, it pulls with vigor, so far as its strength will
-admit; and, secondly, it has a still more important function to fill.
-Its part is to guide the equipage and keep it in the middle of the
-road, to avoid ruts, get around difficult places, and, in general, pick
-the way. While the heavy horses work only with their shoulders to draw
-the load, the donkey, to lead the way, works at the same time with its
-head. This post of honor, this position as leader of the file—would it
-be assigned to the ass if the animal were not recognized as the most
-intelligent of the team?
-
-“I should like to show you also the donkey traveling in mountainous
-countries in company with horses and mules. It is the one to direct the
-band, showing the others the turnouts to take to avoid a dangerous
-place. If the path gets too bad, the donkey foresees the peril with an
-astonishing sagacity; it turns aside a moment from the beaten track,
-finds a way around the difficult spot by a cleverly calculated bend,
-and takes the regular road again farther on. Any mule or horse that
-disdains to follow the donkey’s intelligent leadership runs the risk of
-getting into trouble whence it will be very hard to get it out.”
-
-“As far as I can see,” said Jules, “the donkey is more intelligent than
-the horse, since it acts as the horse’s guide.”
-
-“That is my opinion, too, in spite of the reputation for stupidity that
-it has acquired, I don’t know why. The donkey walks, trots, and gallops
-like the horse, but all its movements are within a smaller compass and
-much slower. Although it can start out at a brisk enough pace, it
-cannot cover great distances or continue on the road for a long time.
-Whatever gait it takes, if the animal is urged to go faster it is soon
-exhausted. It is especially suited to mountainous countries. Its small,
-hard hoofs enable it to follow stony paths with the greatest ease; its
-prudent gait and firm and circumspect step give it access to rough
-places and the steepest slopes.
-
-“The donkey is very robust. In proportion to its size it is perhaps of
-all animals the one that can carry the heaviest load, but as its body
-is small the burden placed on it ought not to exceed moderate limits.
-What a useful servant would one not have in an animal having the
-qualities of the donkey and the vigorous development of the horse! Such
-a creature does not exist in the natural order, but man has obtained it
-by the intervention of his art.
-
-“The species of the horse and that of the ass are unmistakably distinct
-from each other and never cross in the wild state. Nevertheless, since
-they are very nearly related, as their close resemblance in form
-proves, cross-breeding between them is possible with careful
-management. From this unnatural union comes the mule, of which the
-father is the ass and the mother the mare. The mule then is not a
-separate species of animal having its own independent existence; it is
-not an ass nor a horse, but a bastard creature intermediate between the
-two. To its father, the ass, it owes its large head, long ears, narrow
-and hard hoofs, thick skin, rough coat, generally dark in color and
-sometimes ornamented with the two black stripes in the form of a cross
-on the back. To the ass it also owes its temperate habits, its tenacity
-in work, its robust constitution, and the sureness of foot so necessary
-in mountainous countries. From its mother, the mare, it gets its
-powerful equine frame, its quick gait, its freedom of limb. Its rude
-strength, moderation in supplying its animal wants, power of enduring
-the utmost fatigue, indifference to extreme heat, make it one of the
-most useful animals, especially in hot climates where there are long
-spells of drought.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-NOTES
-
-
-[1] Uncle Paul and his nephews are here allowed to defy the purist, as
-they probably would in real life.—Translator.
-
-[2] The poulard (French poularde) bears the same relation to the pullet
-as the capon does to the young rooster.—Translator.
-
-[3] The quoted passages are from Audubon’s “Ornithological Biography,”
-vol. I, pp. 2–9, and are here reproduced verbatim, though very freely
-treated by the French author.—Translator.
-
-[4] Audubon’s narrative (“Ornithological Biography,” vol. I, pp.
-319–324) is here reproduced with greater accuracy than the French
-writer chose to observe. The omissions indicated occur in the French,
-but are not there indicated.—Translator.
-
-[5] This was written before the days of inoculation as a preventive of
-hydrophobia.—Translator.
-
-[6] Centigrade, not Fahrenheit.—Translator.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK OUR HUMBLE HELPERS ***
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the
-United States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
- you are located before using this eBook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that:
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without
-widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.