summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--.gitattributes4
-rw-r--r--LICENSE.txt11
-rw-r--r--README.md2
-rw-r--r--old/67821-0.txt7589
-rw-r--r--old/67821-0.zipbin173813 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/67821-h.zipbin316231 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/67821-h/67821-h.htm9552
-rw-r--r--old/67821-h/images/cover.jpgbin145188 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--old/67821-h/images/tp.jpgbin9991 -> 0 bytes
9 files changed, 17 insertions, 17141 deletions
diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d7b82bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitattributes
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+*.txt text eol=lf
+*.htm text eol=lf
+*.html text eol=lf
+*.md text eol=lf
diff --git a/LICENSE.txt b/LICENSE.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6312041
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LICENSE.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+This eBook, including all associated images, markup, improvements,
+metadata, and any other content or labor, has been confirmed to be
+in the PUBLIC DOMAIN IN THE UNITED STATES.
+
+Procedures for determining public domain status are described in
+the "Copyright How-To" at https://www.gutenberg.org.
+
+No investigation has been made concerning possible copyrights in
+jurisdictions other than the United States. Anyone seeking to utilize
+this eBook outside of the United States should confirm copyright
+status under the laws that apply to them.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..571393a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Project Gutenberg (https://www.gutenberg.org) public repository for
+eBook #67821 (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/67821)
diff --git a/old/67821-0.txt b/old/67821-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index c0e5010..0000000
--- a/old/67821-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,7589 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg eBook of Life of Emanuel Swedenborg, by William
-White
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
-will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before
-using this eBook.
-
-Title: Life of Emanuel Swedenborg
- Together with a brief synopsis of his writings, both
- philosophical and theological
-
-Author: William White
-
-Release Date: April 12, 2022 [eBook #67821]
-
-Language: English
-
-Produced by: Peter Vachuska, Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed
- Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
-
-*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LIFE OF EMANUEL
-SWEDENBORG ***
-
-
-
-
-
-
- LIFE
- OF
- EMANUEL SWEDENBORG.
-
- TOGETHER WITH
- A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF HIS WRITINGS, BOTH PHILOSOPHICAL
- AND THEOLOGICAL.
-
- BY WILLIAM WHITE.
-
- [Illustration]
-
- PHILADELPHIA
- J. B. LIPPINCOTT & CO.
- 1880.
-
-
-
-
-PREFACE.
-
-
-During the few past years many biographies of Swedenborg have been
-offered to the public. Dr. Tafel, of Tübingen, in 1839, collected into
-one volume the testimonies of Swedenborg’s personal friends, his letters,
-and various documents relating to him which were scattered through
-many volumes. This “Book of Documents” was translated into English,
-and edited by the Rev. J. H. Smithson, of Manchester, in 1841; and was
-again reprinted in America and re-edited by Professor Bush, of New York,
-in 1847. From this “Book of Documents,” all the biographies which have
-appeared, have been more or less indebted. Nathanael Hobart, of Boston,
-arranged these documents into a connected biographical form, interspersed
-with judicious remarks of his own, and published it as a “Life of
-Swedenborg.” This “Life” has passed through three editions, and well
-deserves the success it has attained. In 1849, Elihu Rich published, in
-London, “A Biographical Sketch of Emanuel Swedenborg.” The edition was
-exhausted in the course of a few months, and the work has not since been
-reprinted. In the same year, J. J. G. Wilkinson produced his “Emanuel
-Swedenborg: a Biography,” a work which, alike for its artistic excellence
-as a biography, and the originality and poetic beauty of its thought,
-has, I believe, no equal in the English language. The comparative silence
-of our literary critics, in reference to this work, proves that any
-one who cares to appreciate what is best in the world, had better not
-be content to trust solely to _their_ eyes. From the quotations I have
-made in the course of the following narrative, the reader will be able
-to appreciate a few of the good things contained in this Biography by
-Wilkinson. In 1854, Edwin Paxton Hood published “Swedenborg: A Biography
-and an Exposition,” a work which has been the means of introducing
-Swedenborg to a large circle hitherto almost ignorant of his existence.
-In the same year, Woodbury M. Fernald published, in Boston, Mass., “A
-Compendium of the Theological and Spiritual Writings of Swedenborg,” to
-which an excellent life of the Author was prefixed, compiled in great
-part from previous biographies. In other forms, many sketches of the
-life of Swedenborg have been published. The Rev. O. P. Hiller gives an
-excellent little biography in his volume of “Gems from Swedenborg.”
-Emerson tells the story of his life, in his own way, in “Representative
-Men;” and a Lecture by George Dawson, on Swedenborg, is now circulating,
-as a tract, by thousands throughout the land. All these things evidence a
-growing interest in the greatest teacher of modern times.
-
-The present work does not enter into competition with anything that has
-before been written. It pretends to nothing but simplicity, and would
-be ranked as a hand-book, a guide, a directory. If it should lead any
-to form an acquaintance with the writings of “the most _unknown_ man in
-the world,” as Mr. Fernald calls Swedenborg, and I may add, the most
-abused man in the world, my end will be gained. I believe the day is not
-far distant when it will be the greatest reproach of these times that
-the works of Swedenborg lay in our midst, and only a few men cared for
-them. Happily this number is steadily increasing; and, by and by, we may
-expect a general acknowledgment of the fact, that Swedenborg was, without
-exception, the most gifted and extraordinary man that has ever lived.
-
- 36 BLOOMSBURY STREET, LONDON.
-
-
-
-
-CONTENTS.
-
-
- PAGE
-
- CHAPTER I.
-
- Birth and Parentage. Swedenborg’s First Ideas of Religion, and
- his Scholastic Life. 21
-
- CHAPTER II.
-
- Travels, Becomes Author, and is crossed in Love. 26
-
- CHAPTER III.
-
- Travels again. Publishes five Scientific Pamphlets, and
- “Miscellaneous Observations.” Returns Home and enters on the
- Duties of his Assessorship. Writes his “Opera Philosophica
- et Mineralia,” and goes abroad to publish it. 35
-
- CHAPTER IV.
-
- “Opera Philosophica et Mineralia.” 40
-
- CHAPTER V.
-
- Doings and Travels. 47
-
- CHAPTER VI.
-
- “The Economy of the Animal Kingdom,” and “The Animal Kingdom.” 51
-
- CHAPTER VII.
-
- His Life, as a Man of Science, ends. 57
-
- CHAPTER VIII.
-
- His Spiritual Sight opened, and the Conditions of his Seership. 62
-
- CHAPTER IX.
-
- Prepares for his New Office. Resigns his Assessorship. His
- “Adversaria.” His “Spiritual Diary.” The death of Polheim. 73
-
- CHAPTER X.
-
- “The Arcana Cœlestia.” 78
-
- CHAPTER XI.
-
- Anecdotes. 89
-
- CHAPTER XII.
-
- “The Last Judgment.” 95
-
- CHAPTER XIII.
-
- “Heaven and Hell.” 102
-
- CHAPTER XIV.
-
- “The White Horse.” “The Earths in the Universe.” “The New
- Jerusalem and its Heavenly Doctrine.” 130
-
- CHAPTER XV.
-
- Anecdotes. 136
-
- CHAPTER XVI.
-
- “Doctrine of the Lord; The Sacred Scripture; Faith; and Life.” 142
-
- CHAPTER XVII.
-
- “The Divine Love and the Divine Wisdom.” “The Continuation
- of the last Judgment.” 151
-
- CHAPTER XVIII.
-
- “Angelic Wisdom concerning the Divine Providence.” 159
-
- CHAPTER XIX.
-
- Life in Amsterdam. Character of the Dutch. Meets Dr. Beyer.
- Republishes his “New Method of Finding the Longitudes.”
- “The Apocalypse explained.” 169
-
- CHAPTER XX.
-
- “Apocalypse Revealed.” 173
-
- CHAPTER XXI.
-
- Travels. Habits. Anecdotes. 180
-
- CHAPTER XXII.
-
- “Conjugial Love.” 191
-
- CHAPTER XXIII.
-
- Attacked by Dr. Ekebom. Visits France. Letter to Hartley, and
- Hartley’s opinion of Swedenborg. 204
-
- CHAPTER XXIV.
-
- “Brief Exposition of the Doctrines of the New Church,” and the
- “Intercourse between the Soul and the Body.” 210
-
- CHAPTER XXV.
-
- Persecution. Letter to the Academy of Sciences. Leaves Stockholm
- for the last time. 219
-
- CHAPTER XXVI.
-
- Swedenborg in Intercourse with General Tuxen and Paulus ab
- Indagine. His reply to Dr. Ernesti. Letter to the Landgrave
- of Hesse Darmstadt. 227
-
- CHAPTER XXVII.
-
- “The True Christian Religion.” 236
-
- CHAPTER XXVIII.
-
- Anecdotes and Traits of Character. 256
-
- CHAPTER XXIX.
-
- Last Days on Earth. 262
-
-
-
-
-LIFE AND WRITINGS OF EMANUEL SWEDENBORG.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER I.
-
- _His Birth and Parentage—His first ideas of Religion, and his
- Scholastic Life._
-
-
-Authors are never wiser than when they trust to time for justice. The
-poor thinker, neglected by his age, unseen amid the glare of mere show
-and pageantry, need not fret himself. Time will roll on, the false and
-meretricious will sink into forgetfulness, while his true words will
-become accepted, and his thoughts the stars by which wise men guide their
-course across the dark ocean of life.
-
-It was the lot of Emanuel Swedenborg to be cast on a shallow, sceptical,
-and perverse age. Living a life of the utmost purity, and teaching truths
-which we esteem it our great felicity to know, he had but poor thanks so
-far as fame and disciples went. But the dawn of his day of justice is
-approaching. His name, which in past times has too often been used to
-point a sarcasm at whatever is visionary and transcendental, has of late
-years been slowly rising into estimation. Here and there, one eminent man
-after another has spoken some brave words in honor and admiration of the
-great Swede. Slowly, but surely, his writings are claiming attention; his
-disciples, though still few, are quietly earnest and enthusiastic, and
-ever and anon there is seen in the newspaper or periodical, the name of
-Swedenborg mentioned with respect, if not with reverence. Considerable
-curiosity exists in large circles to know more of him, of what he
-did, what were his doctrines, and the nature and number of his books.
-To satisfy, in some measure, these queries and if possible to incite
-a desire for an intimate personal acquaintance with the writings of
-Swedenborg, is the purpose of the present work.
-
-Emanuel Swedenborg was born at Stockholm, on the 29th Jan., 1688. The
-year is a memorable one, as being that in which outraged England drove
-the faithless Stuarts from the throne. His father’s name was Jesper
-Swedberg, and his mother’s, Sarah Behm; both descended from families of
-worth and usefulness in Sweden. His father, at the time of his birth, was
-chaplain to a regiment of cavalry. After passing through several offices,
-one of which was a professorship of theology in the University of Upsal,
-Jesper Swedberg was, in the year 1719, elevated to the bishoprick of
-Skara in West Gothland. His character stood high in Sweden. Simple,
-patriotic, and honest, he was, without being brilliant, a learned and
-industrious man. He wrote much, and published occasionally, as the
-following extract from his diary proves: “I can scarcely believe that
-anybody in Sweden has written so much as I have done; since, I think,
-ten carts could scarcely carry away what I have written and printed at
-my own expense, and yet there is much, yea nearly as much, not printed.”
-Of the professions of his sons, he wisely remarks; “I have kept my sons
-to that profession to which God has given them inclination and liking:
-I have not brought up one to the clerical office, although many parents
-do this inconsiderately, and in a manner not justifiable, by which the
-Christian Church and the clerical order suffer not a little, and are
-brought into contempt.” Writing in his diary forty years after Emanuel’s
-birth, he says: “Emanuel, my son’s name, signifies ‘God with us,’ a name
-which should constantly remind him of the nearness of God, and of that
-interior, holy, and mysterious connection, in which, through faith, we
-stand with our good and gracious God. And blessed be the Lord’s name! God
-has, to this hour, been with him; and may God be further with him, until
-he is eternally united with Him in his kingdom.”
-
-Of Swedenborg’s childhood we have little record. In a letter which,
-late in life, he addressed to Dr. Beyer, he remarks; “With regard to
-what passed in the earliest part of my life, about which you wish to be
-informed: from my fourth to my tenth year, my thoughts were constantly
-engrossed by reflections on God, on salvation, and on the spiritual
-affections of man. I often revealed things in my discourse which filled
-my parents with astonishment, and made them declare at times, that
-certainly the angels spoke through my mouth. From my sixth to my twelfth
-year, it was my greatest delight to converse with the clergy concerning
-faith; to whom I often observed, that charity or love is the life of
-faith; and that this vivifying charity or love is no other than the love
-of one’s neighbor; that God vouchsafes this faith to every one; but that
-it is adopted by those only who practise that charity. I knew of no other
-faith or belief at that time, than that God is the Creator and Preserver
-of Nature; that He endues men with understanding, good inclinations,
-and other gifts derived from these. I knew nothing at that time of the
-systematic or dogmatic kind of faith, that God the Father imputes the
-righteousness or merits of the Son to whomsoever, and at whatever time,
-He wills, even to the impenitent. And had I heard of such a faith, it
-would have been then, as now, perfectly unintelligible to me.”
-
-This confession very vividly shadows forth the future man. We see how
-earnestly his sound, practical mind perceived and clung to the real and
-substantial in theology. His experience of the doctrine of justification
-by faith alone, finds parallels in the lives and experience of many
-eminent men. It was not until after many years’ preaching, that the
-fact of the existence of such a doctrine was presented to the mind of
-Dr. Chalmers, to whom also it was quite unintelligible; yet, overcome
-by the sphere of learning and prestige with which the doctrine was
-environed, Chalmers yielded assent to it, and fancied, as thousands do,
-he believed what by no possibility he could ever understand. Swedenborg
-was too single-eyed in his pursuit of truth to be led aside by authority,
-however imposing; and often, in the following narrative, we shall have to
-observe with what independence, yet with what humility and simplicity, he
-recorded the truths which it was his mission to reveal.
-
-This excellent son of good Bishop Swedberg received the best education
-that the times and his country could afford. In his twenty-second year,
-at the University of Upsal, he took his degree of Doctor in philosophy.
-The dissertation which he wrote for his degree was afterwards published.
-It consisted of a selection of sentences from Seneca, Publius Syrus
-Mimus, and other Latin writers, enriched by comments of his own, and
-notes illustrating the obscurities of the Latin text. This work was so
-highly thought of, as to occasion a poetic eulogy, written in Greek, to
-be inscribed to its author. Swedenborg dedicated this, his first literary
-production, to his father, in a prelude full of veneration and love. Its
-length alone prevents our gratifying the reader with the perusal of this
-beautiful tribute of filial affection. Among his many virtues, it should
-not be accounted the least, that Swedenborg was a loving, dutiful son.
-
-The same year he published, in a work of his father’s, a Latin version of
-the twelfth chapter of Ecclesiastes, which proved, in a high degree, his
-mastery of the Latin language.
-
-In 1710, was finished the strictly scholastic period of Swedenborg’s
-life. He had now reached manhood, and must live as a man among men.
-His youth manifests less precocity than solid and regular development
-of mind. The record of his life at this time, evidences a common-sense
-appreciation of life and its duties, an honest love of virtue, and a
-desire to be useful in his day and generation. The sequel will show that
-his day of life was not unworthy of its dawn.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER II.
-
- _Travels—Becomes Author—Is crossed in Love._
-
-
-Having completed his university education, Swedenborg entered on his
-travels. In his journal, he thus briefly describes a four years’ absence
-from Sweden.
-
-“In the year 1710 I set out for Gottenburg, that I might be conveyed, by
-ship, thence to London. On the voyage, my life was in danger four times:
-first on some shoals, toward which we were driven by a storm, until we
-were within a quarter of a mile from the raging breakers, and we thought
-we should all perish. Afterwards we narrowly escaped some Danish pirates
-under French colors; and the next evening we were fired into from a
-British ship, which mistook us for the same pirates, but without much
-damage. Lastly, in London itself, I was exposed to a more serious danger.
-While we were entering the harbor, some of our countrymen came to us in
-a boat, and persuaded me to go with them into the city. Now it was known
-in London that an epidemic was raging in Sweden, and therefore all who
-arrived from Sweden were forbidden to leave their ships for six weeks,
-or forty days; so I, having transgressed this law, was very near being
-hanged, and was only freed under the condition that, if any one attempted
-the same thing again, he should not escape the gallows.
-
-“At London and Oxford I tarried about a year. Then I went to Holland and
-saw its chief cities. At Utrecht I tarried a long time, while Congress
-was sitting and ambassadors were gathering there from nearly all the
-courts of Europe. Thence I went into France, and passed through Brussels
-and Valenciennes to Paris. Here and at Versailles I spent a year. At the
-end of this time I hastened, by public coach, to Hamburg, and thence to
-Pomerania and Greifswalde, where I remained some time, while Charles
-the Twelfth was coming from Bender to Stralsund. When the siege began,
-I departed in a small vessel, together with a lady named Feif, and by
-Divine Providence was restored to my own country after more than four
-years’ absence.”
-
-While traveling he was not idle; for we find that in 1715, while at
-Greifswalde, he published an oration on the return of Charles XII.
-from Turkey, and a small volume of Latin prose fables. On his return
-to Sweden, he issued, at Skara, a little book of poems, written for
-the most part during his journeyings. These have been republished at
-various times; but, as poems, much cannot be said of them. Wilkinson,
-in his “Biography of Swedenborg,” remarks: “These poems display fancy,
-but a controlled imagination. If we may convey to the English reader
-such a notion of Latin verses, they remind one of the Pope school, in
-which there is generally some theme, or moral, governing the flights of
-the Muse.” Indeed, it was well that Swedenborg was but slightly endowed
-with the poetic faculty. Much of his future mission lay in fields
-which require the coolest and calmest of minds to describe; the sight
-and contemplation of which, would have sent a Shaksperian or Byronic
-temperament into extatic frenzies.
-
-Swedenborg, himself the son of a bishop, was connected with high and
-influential families in Sweden. One of his sisters was married to
-Eric Benzelius, afterwards Archbishop of Upsal; and another to Lars
-Benzelstierna, governor of a province. Other members of the family
-held high and responsible offices in the kingdom. A young man thus
-situated would find little difficulty in settling for life in a
-sphere of usefulness adapted to all his tastes. While on his travels
-on the Continent he wrote letters to Eric Benzelius, detailing every
-novelty in mathematics, astronomy, and mechanics, which came under his
-observation; besides sending home models of all such inventions as he
-thought might be useful to his country. These letters and services
-won for him considerable notice; and on his return to Sweden, he
-assumed the editorship of a new periodical work, entitled “Dædalus
-Hyperboreus.” Among the contributors to this magazine, was the celebrated
-mathematician, Christopher Polheim, who has been called the Swedish
-Archimedes. Swedenborg’s connection with Polheim seems to have led to his
-appointment to the office of Assessor of the Board of Mines, which he
-held with distinguished honor for many years.
-
-In the year 1716, Polheim invited him to go with him to Lund, on a visit
-to Charles XII., who had just escaped from Stralsund. He was very kindly
-received by the King, and obtained from him his official appointment as
-Assessor. He was to assist Polheim in his undertakings, to have a seat
-in the College of Mines, and to give his advice, especially when any
-business of a mathematical nature was on hand.
-
-Charles seems to have at once discerned the rare abilities of Swedenborg,
-and with a desire of uniting him in still closer bonds of amity with
-his favorite Polheim, he advised Polheim to give him his daughter in
-marriage. To this proposal Swedenborg appears to have been in nowise
-averse. He lived with Polheim, at once as his coadjutor, and as his pupil
-in mathematics; and having thus constant opportunities of seeing the fair
-Emerentia, Polheim’s second daughter, had become enamored of her graces.
-In one of his letters, he remarks: “Polheim’s eldest daughter is promised
-to a page of the king’s. I wonder what people say of this in relation to
-myself. His second daughter is, in my opinion, much the handsomest.”
-The attachment, however, was not mutual, and the lady would not allow
-herself to be betrothed. Her father, who deeply loved Swedenborg, caused
-a written agreement to be drawn up, promising his daughter at some
-future day. This document, Emerentia, from filial obedience signed;
-but, as ladies generally do, when forced to love in this way, took to
-sighs and sadness, which so affected her brother with sorrow, that he
-secretly purloined the agreement from Swedenborg. The paper was soon
-missed; for Swedenborg read it over frequently, and, in his grief at its
-loss, besought Polheim to replace it by a new one. But as Swedenborg now
-discovered the pain which he gave to the object of his affections, he at
-once relinquished all claim to her hand, and left her father’s house.
-This was his last, as it was his first endeavor after marriage. In after
-years, when jocosely asked whether he had ever been desirous of marrying,
-he answered: “In my youth I was once on the road to matrimony.” And on
-being asked what was the obstacle, with his characteristic simplicity he
-said: “She would not have me.” Considering the studious and abstracted
-life which he eventually led, it is not to be regretted that he remained
-unwedded. That he was no harsh despiser of the sex, we know well from
-his writings; and that his life was in agreement with his books, we also
-know. The loveliest descriptions of female grace and beauty we have
-ever met with, are contained in his works, chiefly in his treatise on
-“Conjugial Love.” M. Sandell, a member of the Royal Academy of Sciences
-in Sweden, who pronounced a magnificent eulogium on his fellow-member,
-Swedenborg, shortly after his death, says: “Though Swedenborg was never
-married, it was not owing to any indifference toward the sex; for he
-esteemed the company of a fine, intelligent woman as one of the most
-agreeable of pleasures; but his profound studies rendered expedient for
-him the quiet of a single life.”
-
-Swedenborg seems to have had much intercourse with the King. In one of
-his letters, he says: “I found his Majesty very gracious to me; more so
-than I could expect. This is a good omen for the future. Every day I
-laid mathematical subjects before his Majesty, who allowed everything to
-please him. When the eclipse took place, I had his Majesty out to see
-it, and we reasoned much thereupon. He again spoke of my ‘Dædalus,’ and
-remarked upon my not continuing it; for which I pleaded want of means.
-This he does not like to hear of; so I hope to have some assistance
-shortly.” But assistance did not come, and “Dædalus” went the way of many
-such undertakings. Talking of mathematics one day, Charles remarked that
-“he who knew nothing of mathematics, did not deserve to be considered a
-rational man;” a sentiment which Swedenborg thought “truly worthy of a
-king.”[1]
-
-Charles XII. was now engaged in the siege of Frederickshall, and
-Swedenborg’s aid was called in. He very ingeniously planned rolling
-machines, by which two galleys, five large boats, and a sloop, were
-conveyed from Stromstadt to Iderfjol, overland; a distance of fourteen
-miles. Under cover of these vessels, Charles was enabled to transport his
-heavy artillery under the very walls of Frederickshall; but it availed
-little, for at the siege of this town, on November 30, 1718, (old style,)
-this inveterate warrior received the fatal blow which ended his troublous
-and eventful career. He was struck in the head with a cannon ball, and
-though death must have been instantaneous, he was found with his right
-hand firmly grasping the handle of his sword; so prompt was he to put
-himself in an attitude of defence.
-
- “His fall was destined to a barren strand,
- A petty fortress and a dubious hand;
- He left a name at which the world grew pale,
- To point a moral or adorn a tale.”
-
-In 1719 the Swedberg family were ennobled by Queen Ulrica Eleonora,
-and Swedenborg from that time took his place with the nobles of the
-equestrian order, in the triennial Assemblies of the States. This
-distinction conferred little else than a change of name. He was neither a
-Count nor a Baron, as has very commonly been supposed.
-
-Emanuel Swedenborg was rapidly winning for himself the name of a deep
-thinker and a ready writer. In 1717 he published “An Introduction to
-Algebra,” under the title of “The Art of the Rules.” It was highly
-praised for its clearness, and the order and force of its examples. The
-first portion of the work, however, was all that was published. The
-second, containing the first account given in Sweden of the differential
-and integral calculus, still remains in MS. His second publication
-this year was, “Attempts to find the Longitude of Places by Lunar
-Observations.” Both works were written in Swedish.
-
-In 1719 four works proceeded from his increasingly fertile pen. “A
-Proposal for a Decimal System of Money and Measures;” “A Treatise on the
-Motion and Position of the Earth and Planets;” “Proofs derived from
-Appearances in Sweden, of the Depth of the Sea, and the greater Force of
-the Tides in the Ancient World;” and “On Docks, Sluices, and Salt Works.”
-
-His work on the Decimal system of coinage and measures was republished in
-1795. Swedenborg’s ideas on this and most other subjects were far ahead
-of the times in which he lived. In one of his letters he thus alludes
-to the discouragements he met with on this account. “It is a little
-discouraging to me to be advised to relinquish my views, as among the
-novelties the country can not bear. For my part, I desire all possible
-novelties; aye, a novelty for every day in the year; for in every age
-there is an abundance of persons who follow the beaten track, and remain
-in the old way; while there are not more than from six to ten in a
-century who bring forward innovations founded on argument and reason.”
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER III.
-
- _Travels again—Publishes five Scientific Pamphlets and
- “Miscellaneous Observations”—Returns Home and enters on the
- duty of his Assessorship—Writes his “Opera Philosophica et
- Mineralia,” and goes abroad to publish it._
-
-
-In the spring of 1721, Swedenborg visited Holland a second time, and
-chose Amsterdam as a place of publication for the following five little
-works:—“Some Specimens of a Work on the Principles of Natural Philosophy,
-comprising New Attempts to Explain the Phenomena of Chemistry and Physics
-by Geometry;” “New Observations and Discoveries respecting Iron and Fire,
-and particularly respecting the Elemental Nature of Fire, together with
-a new construction of Stoves;” “A New Method of finding the Longitude of
-Places, on Land or at Sea, by Lunar Observations;” “A New Mechanical Plan
-of constructing Docks and Dykes;” and “A Mode of Discovering the Powers
-of Vessels by the application of Mechanical Principles.”
-
-The titles of these pamphlets prove that their author was no ordinary
-man. But the publication of them was not his only object in this visit
-to the continent. It was his desire to improve his practical knowledge
-of mining, to enable him the better to fulfill his duties as Assessor.
-For this purpose he left Amsterdam for Leipsic, passing through
-Aix-la-Chapelle, Liege, and Cologne, and visiting the different mines and
-smelting works which lay in his route. At Leipsic he published, in 1722,
-“Miscellaneous Observations connected with the Physical Sciences,” Parts
-I. to III.; and at Hamburg, in the same year, Part IV., principally on
-minerals, iron, and the stalactites in Beaumann’s cavern. The reigning
-Duke of Brunswick, Louis Rudolph, most hospitably received Swedenborg,
-defrayed his traveling expenses, and on his departure, testified his
-admiration of the young savant by presenting him with a gold medallion,
-and a weighty silver goblet. In return for these favors, Swedenborg
-dedicated Part IV. of his “Miscellaneous Observations” to him.
-
-In speaking of the foregoing works, it is difficult, in the few words
-to which we must limit ourselves, to do them the justice which their
-originality and daring speculation deserve. As Wilkinson remarks, “the
-fortress of mineral truth was the first which he approached, and with
-the most guarded preparation. His method was furnished by geometry and
-mechanics; the laws of the pure sciences were to be the interpreters of
-the facts of chemistry and physics. The beginning of nature, says he, is
-identical with the beginning of geometry; the origin of natural particles
-is due to mathematical points, just as is the origin of lines, forms,
-and the whole of geometry: because everything in nature is geometrical,
-everything in geometry is natural. Carrying out this theory, he seeks to
-define the laws of chemical essence and combination, by the truths of
-mathematics.” Mr. Strutt, the translator of these works into English,
-says: “This extraordinary attempt to bring invisible things to light,
-has been thoroughly justified by the success which has attended Dalton’s
-hypothesis, in an age better prepared for its application; and by the
-equally remarkable fact that the definitions given of solids, acids, and
-alkalies, have gradually approximated very near indeed to those which
-result from Swedenborg’s hypothesis. We say nothing here of a latent
-connection between the principle on which it is founded, and some of the
-results obtained by Berzelius, whose fame, as a chemist, is as wide as
-the civilized world.” It need only be added that M. Dumas, the French
-chemist, ascribes to these works by Swedenborg, the origin of the modern
-science of crystallography. He says, “It is to him we are indebted for
-the first idea of making cubes, tetrahedrons, pyramids, and the different
-crystalline forms, by the grouping of spherical particles; and it is an
-idea which has been renewed by several distinguished men, Wollaston in
-particular.”
-
-After an absence of fifteen months, Swedenborg returned to his home in
-Stockholm, at midsummer, 1722. He now for the first time entered fully
-upon the duties of his Assessorship; having deferred doing so until his
-knowledge of metallurgy had become sufficiently practical and extensive.
-At this time he published an anonymous pamphlet “On the Depreciation and
-Rise of the Swedish Currency.” The currency seems to have been a favorite
-subject with Swedenborg; and in his senatorial capacity, it engaged much
-of his attention. The pamphlet seems to have been much thought of, for we
-find that it was republished at Upsal in 1771. There are few productions
-of this kind that will endure a revival forty-nine years after their
-first publication.
-
-The tenor of Swedenborg’s life for eleven years after this, seems to have
-flowed quietly on in the regular fulfilment of the duties of his office.
-It may be supposed that he had become tired of writing and publishing
-scientific works, and that for a time he wished to rest from this kind
-of labor. His abilities were appreciated by his countrymen, for we find
-that he was solicited to accept the Professorship of mathematics in the
-University of Upsal, in 1724. He declined the honor. It appears that he
-had a distaste for the unpractical and merely speculative character of
-the pure mathematician. We find him writing to his brother-in-law in
-this strain:—“I wonder at Messieurs the mathematicians having lost all
-heart and spirit to realize that fine design of yours for an astronomical
-observatory. It is the fatality of mathematicians to remain chiefly in
-theory. I have often thought it would be a capital thing, if, to each
-ten mathematicians, one good practical man were added, to lead the rest
-to market: he would be of more use and mark than all the ten.” In 1729,
-Swedenborg became a member of the Royal Academy of Science at Stockholm.
-
-Discontinuing the pamphlet style of publication, Swedenborg now centered
-his thoughts upon the production of a much larger and more laborious work
-than he had hitherto attempted. It was entitled “Opera Philosophica et
-Mineralia.” In order to secure its proper publication, he went abroad,
-for the third time, in May, 1733. After spending five months in Germany,
-seeing everything note-worthy, he commenced the printing of his work
-at Leipsic, in the month of October. In the course of the year 1734,
-the whole was finished in three handsome folio volumes, enriched with
-numerous copper-plates, and an engraved likeness of the author. At this
-time he was again a visitor at the court of the Duke of Brunswick, who
-munificently defrayed the cost of his expensive publication. The volumes
-were published at Leipsic and Dresden.
-
-At the same time he issued a little work called “A Philosophical Argument
-on the Infinite, and the Final Cause of Creation; and on the Mechanism of
-the Intercourse between the Soul and the Body.” It may be regarded as a
-supplement to the foregoing.
-
-His work being finished, he left Leipsic for Cassel, and passing
-homewards through Gotha, Brunswick, and Hamburg, arrived at Stockholm in
-July, 1734. It is to be remembered that in this journey he had still the
-duties of his office in view. He visited mines everywhere, studied their
-modes of working, and sought continually to make himself useful to his
-country.
-
-It now becomes necessary to speak of his great volumes of philosophical
-and mineral works.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IV.
-
- _Opera Philosophica et Mineralia._
-
-
-In attempting to give the reader an idea of the contents and aims of this
-great work, within the compass of a few paragraphs, one feels extreme
-difficulty in knowing where or how to begin. It starts so many topics,
-is so full of the deepest scientific truth, speculates so boldly, and
-reaches to such heights of subtle thought, that we must necessarily
-confine ourselves to a very superficial view, and the enumeration of a
-few of its prominent features.
-
-As before said, the work occupies three large folio volumes. Of the
-second and third of these, it does not lie in our province to say
-much. Both are strictly practical works; one on iron, and the other on
-copper and brass. They are evidences of Swedenborg’s ardent devotion
-to the duties of his office; and as a testimony to the worth of the
-books themselves, it need only be said, that portions of them have been
-repeatedly reprinted, and that they are held in high estimation by those
-who study metallurgy as a science, or follow it as a profession. The
-publication of the secrets of trade and manufacture in these volumes,
-was not relished by the narrow-minded and selfish. Of such the author
-observes:—“There are persons who love to hold their knowledge for
-themselves alone, and to be the reputed possessors and guardians of
-secrets. People of this kind grudge the public everything, and if any
-discovery, by which art and science will be benefited, comes to light,
-they regard it askance, with scowling visages, and probably denounce
-the discoverer as a babbler who lets out mysteries. But why should such
-secrets be grudged to the public? Why withhold from this enlightened age?
-Whatever is worthy to be known, should by all means be brought to the
-great and general market of the world. Unless we do this, we can neither
-grow wiser nor happier with time.” These are true, liberal, and noble
-words.
-
-But it is the first volume which is the greatest and most important of
-the three. It has recently been translated into English by the Rev.
-Augustus Clissold, and published in two considerable octavos. It is
-entitled “Principia; or the First Principles of Natural Things, being New
-Attempts toward a Philosophical Explanation of the Elementary World.” In
-this volume an attempt is made to explain the generation of the elements,
-the creation of matter, and the nature of the occult forces playing
-within nature. To pronounce an absolute opinion upon such a work would be
-highly hazardous; for positive science at present, affords no sufficient
-data to test many of its highest reasonings. So far, however, as such
-tests have been granted, they serve to manifest the fact that among
-speculative natural philosophers, Swedenborg is second to none. Gœrres,
-an eminent German philosopher, speaking of the “Principia,” remarks:—“It
-is a production indicative of profound thought in all its parts, and not
-unworthy of being placed by the side of Newton’s mathematical ‘Principia
-of Natural Philosophy.’” We will now adduce a few proofs of the truth of
-this assertion.
-
-Humboldt, in his “Kosmos,” remarks: “That great and enthusiastic although
-cautious observer, Sir William Herschel, was the first to sound the
-depths of heaven, in order to determine the limits and form of the starry
-system we inhabit.” The discovery of the place of our sun and system
-in the Milky Way, is certainly due to Herschel, but Swedenborg has a
-prior claim to the honor. In the “Principia,” written four years before
-Herschel was born, the statement of our sun’s position in the heavens
-was explicitly made, with the method by which the fact was observed. But
-this is not all. The changes observed in the planetary orbits, seemed
-at one time to warrant the belief in a final destruction of all things
-through the falling of creation into chaos. After awhile, however, La
-Grange brought forward his beautiful theory, by which was established the
-doctrine, that though the solar system is liable to certain mutations
-in the form and eccentricity of its orbits in very long periods, yet
-in consequence of a certain relation which prevails in the system,
-between the masses, orbital axes, and eccentricities, in time all orbits
-return again to what they originally were, oscillating between very
-narrow limits. This discovery of a cyclar return, confirmed by the most
-eminent astronomers, is pronounced by Professor Playfair to be, “next
-to Newton’s discovery of the elliptical orbits of the planets,—without
-doubt the noblest truth in physical astronomy.” This discovery has also
-to be claimed for Swedenborg. In his “Principia,” the fact of this cyclar
-mutation and return of the planets to order, is repeatedly stated, and
-with great accuracy and plainness. Want of space alone forbids several
-quotations in proof. It need only be noted that the “Principia” was
-published forty-four years before La Grange announced his famous theory.
-Again, the doctrine of the translatory or progressive motion of the
-stars along the Milky Way, and their streaming out at the northern
-end, and in at the southern; diverging at the northern end in every
-direction, while at the southern end they converge at every point,—one
-of the most magnificent truths of modern astronomy,—is clearly set forth
-in this wonderful work of Swedenborg’s, years before the full fact had
-dawned upon the scientific world. Again, the sublime doctrine of the
-cosmical arrangement of the stars, or of the clustering of stars into
-distinct systems, forming starry systems, as planets do solar systems,
-generally attributed to Kant, Mitchell, and one or two others, was
-promulgated by Swedenborg in the “Principia,” when Kant, the first of the
-acknowledged propounders of the theory, was a boy of ten years of age.
-The first enunciation of the nebular hypothesis, is also to be referred
-to Swedenborg’s “Principia.” Indeed La Place, to whom the hypothesis is
-generally attributed, indirectly owed some of his ideas on the subject to
-Swedenborg. La Place owned that Buffon was the first that suggested the
-theory of the origin of the planets and their satellites from the sun.
-Now Buffon was acquainted with Swedenborg’s “Principia,” as is evident
-from the fact that an eminent London bookseller recently sold a copy of
-the “Principia” containing Buffon’s autograph.[2] It need only be added,
-that, fifteen years before Buffon published his theory, and seventy-five
-years before La Place offered his own to the public, Swedenborg had
-propounded his version of the nebular hypothesis in the “Principia.” It
-is true that La Place and Swedenborg differ on several points; but recent
-science and experiment have tended to prove that, wherein they differ,
-Swedenborg’s theories are the most accurate.
-
-While advancing these high claims for Swedenborg, in astronomical science
-and theory, it is but right to remove from the public mind an erroneous
-idea, which, like his titles of Baron and Count, has no foundation in
-fact. We allude to his common repute as the announcer of the existence
-of the seventh planet, Uranus, discovered by Herschel in 1781. That he
-announced the existence of this planet long before its actual discovery,
-has been stated innumerable times, at home and abroad; and Emerson in
-his lecture on the Mystic, takes opportunity to be witty in regretting
-that he did not discover the eighth. The mistake has arisen from
-Swedenborg’s talking of a seventh planet in “The Worship and Love of
-God,” a book of his yet to be noticed. Now the belief in the existence of
-a seventh planet was entertained by most of the astronomers of his day,
-and even so far back as Kepler, in 1584. Swedenborg, in speaking as he
-did, only expressed a general idea. Astronomers observing the wide space
-between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter conjectured that some planet must
-roll between. The after discovery of numerous asteroids between these
-orbits, gave some show of truth to their conjectures. It was of this
-supposed planet between Mars and Jupiter, and not of Uranus, (afterwards
-discovered by Sir William Herschel,) that Swedenborg spoke.
-
-In magnetism, as in astronomy, the “Principia” is no less rich in
-original thought and discovery. It was not until the close of the
-eighteenth century that the position of the magnetic equator was
-discovered to be different from that of the geographical. After
-observations confirmed the fact that the mean latitudinal positions of
-the magnetic poles and equators, are identical with those of the earth’s
-ecliptic and ecliptical poles. This fact, over which there has been much
-congratulation, was set forth in the “Principia” many years before it
-was confirmed by actual observation. Again, the fact that the southern
-magnetic pole has a longer axis from the center of the magnetic equator,
-than the northern, and hence occupies a higher latitudinal position;
-and, as a consequence, that the revolution of the north magnetic pole
-is quicker than that of the southern; also that the south magnetic pole
-possesses a greater attractive force than the north,—facts not suspected
-till the investigations of Hansteen in 1819, and only fully confirmed
-by observation very recently,—were all proclaimed in the “Principia”
-nearly a century before positive science had embraced them in her
-domain. Swedenborg also takes precedence of all other discoverers in the
-announcement of the identity of the magnetic streams forming the aurora,
-and those influencing the magnetic needle. So full is the “Principia” of
-truths respecting magnetism,—which the world generally supposes to be a
-novelty of the present day—that we could not imagine a greater pleasure
-or surprise awaiting any one devoted to the prosecution of magnetic
-science, than the perusal of this commonly supposed old-fashioned and
-antiquated “Principia” of speculative science.
-
-We will now say a few words on the great chemical truths which the
-“Principia” revealed. In 1734, not a whisper had been breathed regarding
-the composite nature of the atmosphere. The earliest date which
-can be assigned for the practical discovery of the two-fold nature
-of atmospheric air, is 1772-4, the date of Priestley’s celebrated
-experiments. But we find in the “Principia,” that Swedenborg sets forth
-the following facts:—that pure and dry atmospheric air is a compound
-of two constituents; that these constituents are combined in unequal
-proportions; that the element greatest in quantity is the extinguisher
-of combustion; and lastly, that the element greatest in quantity is a
-constituent of water as well as of air. The merest tyro in science will,
-at a glance, perceive the importance and extent of ground which these
-propositions cover, and how profound must have been that genius, which,
-in the midst of the deepest scientific darkness, could draw from nature
-these deep and choice truths. But this was not all. Water as well as air
-yielded to him the secret of its constitution. In Swedenborg’s day, the
-whole world thought and spoke of water as an element, and even after the
-composite nature of air was revealed, water maintained its elemental
-character up to 1783, when the discovery was almost simultaneously made
-by Watt, Priestley, Cavendish, and Lavoisier, that water, like air, is a
-result of the combination of two gases. Now in the “Principia,” written
-fifty years before, we are expressly told that pure water is a compound
-substance, and the particulars and quantities of the two elements in its
-composition are correctly given. There are many other truths in modern
-science which the “Principia” anticipates; such as the atomic theory, and
-the identity of electricity and lightning; but we must draw to a close.
-Enough has been said to show the high merits of the book, and to prove
-how worthy it is of the study and attention of all true lovers of science.
-
-The publication of the “Principia” gained for its author great
-reputation, and his friendship and correspondence were eagerly courted
-by all the philosophers of his day. In December, 1734, the Academy of
-Sciences at St. Petersburg appointed him one of their corresponding
-members. The Pope honored the work by placing it in that noble catalogue
-of books, the Index Expurgatorius, in 1739.
-
-It may be very pertinently asked, how it happens that a work abounding
-in such important doctrines and theories should be so little known.
-The neglect is easily accounted for in the great subsequent fame of
-its author as a religious visionary. His later reputation effectually
-out-shone that which he so deservedly won in his younger days; and few,
-even of his own disciples, until recently, thought of lifting from
-the dusty shelves those great books of scientific theory, which, of
-themselves, established for their author a place among the greatest of
-men. The “Principia,” as its translator truly says, “is a book for the
-future;” and taking these words in their full import, it would be hardly
-possible to pronounce a higher panegyric.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER V.
-
- _Doings and Travels._
-
-
-From 1734 to 1736, Swedenborg remained at home. In July, 1735, his
-father died; and a year after, Swedenborg went abroad, as he states in
-his diary, “for a sojourn of three or four years, to write and publish a
-certain book.” During his absence he resigned half of his official salary
-to his substitutes. His father having left him some money, he was the
-better able to do so. He journeyed through Denmark, Hanover, and Holland,
-and arrived at Rotterdam during the fair. Observing the amusements of the
-people, mountebanks, shows, etc., he took occasion to moralize thus upon
-the character and prosperity of the Dutch. “Here at Rotterdam, it has
-suggested itself to me to inquire why it is that God has blessed a people
-so barbarous and boorish as the Dutch, with such a fertile and luxuriant
-soil; that He has preserved them, for so long a course of years, from
-all misfortune; that He has raised them up in commerce above all other
-nations; and made their provinces the mart and emporium of the wealth of
-Europe and the world. On consideration, the first and principal cause
-of these circumstances appears to be, that Holland is a republic, which
-form of government is more pleasing to God than an absolute monarchy. In
-a republic, no veneration or worship is paid to any man, but the highest
-and lowest think themselves equal to kings and emperors; as may be seen
-from the characteristic bearing of every one in Holland. The only one
-whom they worship is God. And when God alone is worshiped, and men are
-not adored instead of Him, such worship is most acceptable to Him. Then
-again, in Holland, there is the greatest liberty. None are slaves, but
-all are as lords and masters under the government of the most high God;
-and the consequence is, that they do not depress their manliness either
-by shame or fear, but always preserve a firm and sound mind in a sound
-body; and with a free spirit, and an erect countenance, commit themselves
-and their property to God, who alone ought to govern all things. It is
-not so in absolute monarchies, where men are educated to simulation
-and dissimulation; where they learn to have one thing concealed in the
-breast, and to bring forth another upon the tongue; where their minds,
-by inveterate custom, become so false and counterfeit, that, in divine
-worship itself, their words differ from their thoughts, and they proffer
-their flattery and deceit to God himself, which certainly must be most
-displeasing to Him. This seems to be the reason why the Dutch are more
-prosperous in their undertakings than other nations.” Then, with rare
-discrimination, he adds, “but their worshiping mammon as a Deity, and
-caring for nothing but gold, is a thing which is not compatible with long
-prosperity.” The silent and uninfluential place which Holland now fills
-in Europe, places the seal of truth on these quiet lines.
-
-The Roman Catholic Church seems to have attracted much of his attention
-in his travels, and the grossness and sensuality of its priesthood were
-strongly remarked upon. “The monks,” says he, “at Roye, are fat and
-corpulent, and an army of such fellows might be banished without loss to
-the State. They fill their bellies, take all they can get, and give the
-poor nothing but fine words and blessings; and yet they are willing to
-take from the poor all their substance for nothing. What is the good of
-bare-footed Franciscans?” In Paris, he spent a year and a half. There
-also he was amazed at the clerical riot and corruption. “It is found,”
-he observes, “that the tax which they term the dixièmes, yields annually
-thirty-two millions sterling; and that the Parisians spend two-thirds
-of this amount over their own city. One-fifth of the whole possessions
-of the kingdom is in the hands of the clerical order. If this condition
-of things last long, the ruin of the empire will be speedy.” He little
-dreamed of the fearful verification which these words would receive.
-
-His journal in Paris reveals the fact of his hearty enjoyment of
-sight-seeing and amusements. Visits to churches, monasteries, palaces,
-gardens, museums, and theatres, evidence with what zest he drank the cup
-of life, and with what interest he looked upon men and their affairs. In
-this respect we do well to compare Swedenborg with many whom the world
-in its ignorance associate with him. At no period of his life was he a
-cold self-righteous ascetic, looking abroad upon men with a bitter and
-accusing scowl. At no time did he insult his Maker with upbraidings that
-his fate was to live in an evil world, and with a wicked generation. He
-received life with thankfulness, partook temperately of all its lawful
-pleasures, did his duty, and took care while living with the world to
-keep himself unspotted from its evil. This social discipline was one of
-the Divine means by which he was fitted for the full performance of his
-future mission.
-
-We are not informed of the nature of the work which he at this time
-went abroad to write and publish. From his manuscripts, however, it
-appears that he was preparing materials and disciplining his mind for
-his great work, the “Animal Kingdom,” by writing short papers on various
-physiological subjects. Many of these papers have been translated and
-published under the title of “Posthumous Tracts.”
-
-Leaving Paris in March, 1738, Swedenborg directed his steps toward Italy,
-and after visiting its principal cities, arrived at Rome on the 25th
-September. Mr. Rich, in his “Biography of Swedenborg,” remarks,—“This
-visit should be a memorable one, for it brought the church of the past
-and the future into a singular communion with each other;—Rome in the
-still atmosphere and fading light of autumn, with all its trophies of
-Pagan art, and its hoary traditions; and Swedenborg, the predestined
-Seer of the last ages, whose eye was just kindling with the light of
-inspiration. We should lose all faith in the instinctive prescience of
-the human spirit when great events are at hand, if we might not believe
-that a presentiment of something in the shadowy distance, connecting
-his future with the strange mystery of the city, did not cross, for a
-moment, the mind of Swedenborg, when he entered the once holy and revered
-metropolis of the faith.”
-
-After a sojourn of five months, Swedenborg left Rome on the 15th of
-February, 1739, varying his homeward route. His journal from the 17th of
-March, 1739, when he was at Genoa, is a blank, and his after wanderings
-we can only conjecture. “It is most probable,” says Wilkinson, “that
-he deposited the manuscript of the “Economy of the Animal Kingdom,” at
-Amsterdam, on his way from Leipsic to Sweden, in 1740; that he lived in
-his own country from 1740 or 1741 till 1744, and in the latter year went
-again to Holland, and from thence came to England, where we meet him in
-1745.”
-
-In 1740-41, Swedenborg published at Amsterdam his “Economy of the Animal
-Kingdom;” and in 1744-45, the “Animal Kingdom,” Parts I. and II. at the
-Hague, and Part III. in London.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VI.
-
- _The “Economy of the Animal Kingdom,” and the “Animal Kingdom.”_
-
-
-In the “Animal Kingdom,” Swedenborg referred solely to the human body,
-it being the microcosm, or representative of all inferior systems. In
-the “Economy of the Animal Kingdom,” he treats of the blood, and the
-organs which contain it; the coincidence of the motion of the brain with
-the respiration of the lungs; and of the human soul. The method pursued
-in this work is admirable. A careful series of extracts, containing
-facts from the best anatomists, is prefixed to each chapter, and thence
-is deduced the author’s theory. It would be very difficult indeed to
-present, in an abstract, the substance of these quotations, and without
-this, (which would be inconsistent with our limits,) the theories could
-not be fairly understood or appreciated. His demonstration of the
-coincidence of the motion of the brain with the respiration of the lungs,
-is well worthy of notice. Wilkinson, speaking of this in his “Biography
-of Swedenborg,” says: “Let any reader think for a moment of what he
-experiences when he breathes, and attends to the act. He will find that
-his whole frame heaves and subsides at the time; face, chest, stomach,
-and limbs, are all actuated by his respiration. His sense is, that not
-only his lungs but his entire body breathes. Now mark what Swedenborg
-elicited from this fact. If the whole man breathes or heaves, so also do
-the organs which he contains, for they are necessarily drawn outwards
-by the rising of the surface; therefore they all breathe. What do they
-breathe? Two elements are omnipresent in them, the blood-vessels and the
-nerves; the one giving them pabulum, the other life. They draw then into
-themselves blood, and life or nervous spirit. Each does this according
-to its own form; each, therefore, has a free individuality like the
-whole man; each takes its food, the blood, when it chooses; each wills
-into itself the life according to its desires. The man is made up of
-manlike parts; his freedom is an aggregate of a host of atomic, organical
-freedoms. The heart does not cram them with its blood, but each, like the
-man itself, takes what it thinks right.
-
-“But, furthermore, thought commences and corresponds with respiration.
-The reader has before attended to the presence of the heaving over
-the body; now let him _feel his thoughts_, and he will see that they
-too heave with the mass. When he entertains a long thought he draws a
-long breath; when he thinks quickly, his breath vibrates with rapid
-alternations; when the tempest of anger shakes his mind, his breath is
-tumultuous; when his soul is deep and tranquil, so is his respiration;
-when success inflates him, his lungs are as tumid as his conceits.
-Let him make trial of the contrary: let him endeavor to think in long
-stretches at the same time that he breathes in fits, and he will find
-that it is impossible; that in this case the chopping lungs will needs
-mince his thoughts. Now the mind dwells in the brain, and it is the
-brain, therefore, which shares the varying fortunes of the breathing. It
-is strange that this correspondence between the states of the brain or
-mind, and the lungs, has not been admitted into science; for it holds in
-every case, at every moment. In truth it is so unfailing, and so near to
-the center of sense, that this has made it difficult to regard it as an
-object; for if you only try to think upon the breathing, in consequence
-of the fixation of thought, you stop the breath that very moment, and
-only recommence it when the thought can no longer hold, that is to
-say, when the brain has need to expire. Now Swedenborg, with amazing
-observation and sagacity, has made a regular study of this ratio between
-the respiration and the thoughts and emotions; he shows in detail that
-the two correspond exactly, and moreover that their correspondence is one
-of the long-sought links between the soul and the body, whereby every
-thought is represented and carried out momentaneously in the expanse of
-the human frame. It is difficult to give a more plain or excellent reason
-of the tie between the body and the soul, than that the latter finds the
-body absolutely to its mind; while on the other hand, the living body
-clings to the soul, because it wants a friendly superior life to infuse
-and direct its life.”
-
-The “Animal Kingdom,” written after the same plan as the “Economy,”
-treats of the organs of the abdomen, of those of the chest, and of the
-skin. Swedenborg, in setting forth his plan of operation, in which he
-announces his intention to examine, physically and philosophically, the
-whole anatomy of the body, and lastly of the soul, and of its state in
-the body, says: “From this summary or plan, the reader may see that the
-end I propose to myself in the work, is a knowledge of the soul, since
-this knowledge will constitute the crown of my studies. This, then, my
-labors intend, and thither they aim. To accomplish this grand end, I
-enter the circus, designing to consider and examine thoroughly the whole
-world of microcosm which the soul inhabits; for I think it vain to seek
-her anywhere but in her own kingdom. I am, therefore, resolved to allow
-myself no respite, until I have run through the whole field to the very
-goal, or until I have traversed the universal animal kingdom to the
-soul. Thus I hope that by bending my course inward continually, I shall
-open all the doors that lead to her, and at length contemplate the soul
-herself, by the Divine permission.” One of his manuscripts repeats this
-design in these words: “I have gone through anatomy with the single end
-of investigating the soul. It will be a satisfaction to me if my labors
-be of any use to the anatomical and medical world, but a still greater
-satisfaction if I afford any light towards the investigation of the soul.”
-
-In striving to compass such high spiritual knowledge, by merely natural
-means, he necessarily failed. In one of his books, written several years
-after, when a brighter light had dawned upon his mind, he says: “Many in
-the learned world have laboured in investigating the soul, but as they
-knew nothing of the spiritual world, and of the state of man after death,
-they could not do otherwise than construct hypotheses, not respecting the
-soul’s nature, or its operation on the body. Of the soul’s nature, they
-could have no other idea than as of something most pure in ether, and
-of its continent as of ether. Now having such a conception of the soul,
-and yet knowing that the soul acts on the body, and produces everything
-in it that has relation to sense and motion, therefore they labored, as
-we before observed, to investigate the soul’s operation on the body,
-which some said was effected by influx, and some by harmony. But these
-means discovered nothing in which the mind desirous of seeing the ground
-of things, can acquiesce.” We have in these sentences the cause of the
-fruitlessness of his own labors at this period, in their highest aims.
-They formed, however, a part of that providential discipline which was
-fitting him for his future office.
-
-Fruitless though these works necessarily were, in their highest aim, yet
-in lower ends they are treasure-houses of thought and suggestion. Taking
-for his basis the dry facts of the anatomists, he proceeds to clothe them
-with life and comeliness. He shows how part is bound to part in the human
-system, and fills the cold details of science with a warm and human
-interest. Emerson well says: “The ‘Animal Kingdom’ is a book of wonderful
-merits. It was written with the highest end, to put science and soul,
-so long estranged from each other, at one again. It was the anatomist’s
-account of the human body in the highest style of poetry; and nothing can
-exceed the bold and brilliant treatment of a subject usually so dry and
-repulsive.”
-
-It was hardly possible for books to be ushered into the world to die
-more quietly than did these physiological treatises. Slightly noticed
-in a few catalogues and reviews of that day, they were laid on the
-shelf, and reposed in dust and forgetfulness for a full century. Called
-to other thoughts and higher labors, their author was arrested midway
-in his plans; and ceasing to exist behind his books, and by his life,
-conversation, and activity, to keep up the public interest, the world
-soon forgot their existence. But their worth has been their preservative;
-and now we behold their resurrection, and slow, but certain, growth
-into acceptance and fame. Translated by Wilkinson, and enriched by him
-with prefaces which Emerson describes as “throwing all the contemporary
-philosophy of England into the shade,” they are now placed before
-the world, and, in their excellence serve to manifest the profound
-understanding and genius of their author.
-
-In 1745, Swedenborg terminated his long series of scientific works, by
-the publication, in London, of “The Worship and Love of God.” This book
-is an embodiment, in a story, of its author’s scientific doctrines. In
-a connected narrative, it treats of the origin of the earth, the birth,
-infancy, and love, of Adam; and of the soul in its state of integrity, in
-the image of God. It is a book of which little need be said, as it was
-probably written as much for an exercise of fancy, as with any serious
-intent. Cast into shade, as it is, by the brighter light of his after
-knowledge, it remains to mark the point of intellectual development at
-which Swedenborg had at this time arrived; and in this respect it will
-always have a strong interest to those who delight in tracing the growth
-and education of his mind.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VII.
-
- _His Life, as a Man of Science, ends._
-
-
-The biographer of Swedenborg can feel no difficulty in distributing under
-proper heads the principal events of his life. It divides itself so
-distinctly into two parts, at this juncture, that, between his past and
-his future there is what he himself would call a “discrete degree.”
-
-In 1745, when the merely scientific phase of Swedenborg’s life closed, he
-had arrived at the mature age of fifty-seven years. As we have seen, he
-had, from early manhood, united an active and practical, with a deeply
-philosophic, life. An earnest student of nature, he had never become so
-engrossed in thought as to forget the end of all thought—the improvement
-and the happiness of mankind. His long series of scientific works had
-gained him a wide-spread reputation, and wherever he went, he was hailed
-as a friend and brother by the thoughtful and philosophical. In Sweden,
-as before said, he was well connected; and had he been desirous to live
-at home, and immerse himself in the cares and politics of his country,
-he might have reached the highest offices and honors which royalty
-could confer. At the age of fifty-seven, with Swedenborg’s attainments,
-success, and fame, a worldly man might have been content. Such a one
-would, probably, have taken his ease, reposed upon the past, and have
-been content with the competence of comfort and reputation which he had
-attained. But Swedenborg was a man of a very different character. Love
-of ease formed no part of his constitution, and if he had not been led
-by the hand of Providence to the contemplation of the spiritual world and
-its glorious realities, he would, to the end of his life, have remained a
-zealous and single-eyed seeker after the truths of the natural world.
-
-The annals of science do not furnish an instance of any one who surpassed
-Swedenborg in that humility of spirit, and that simple desire for truth,
-which is the crowning grace and glory of the true philosopher. Although,
-at times, he propounded views which he knew were antagonistic to the
-ideas of some of the leading savans of his time, yet we never find him
-getting angry or attempting to scold the world into belief with him. He
-simply lays down what he believes to be the truth; and with the most
-charming modesty trusts for its acceptance among men, to its agreement
-with reason and facts. Full of this trustful spirit we find him saying
-in the “Principia:” “In writing the present work, I have not aimed at
-the applause of the learned world, nor at the acquisition of a name or
-popularity. To me, it is a matter of indifference whether I win the
-favorable opinion of every one, or of no one; whether I gain much or no
-commendation. Such things are not objects of regard to one whose mind is
-bent on truth and true philosophy. Should I, therefore, gain the assent
-or approbation of others, I shall receive it only as a confirmation of
-my having pursued the truth. I have no wish to persuade any one to lay
-aside the principles of those illustrious and talented authors who have
-adorned the world, and in place of their principles to adopt mine. For
-this reason it is, that I have not made mention so much as of one of
-them, or even hinted at his name, lest I should injure his feelings,
-or seem to impugn his sentiments, or to derogate from the praise which
-others bestow upon him. If the principles I have advanced have more of
-truth in them than those which are advocated by others; if they are
-truly philosophical, and accordant with the phenomena of nature, the
-assent of the public will follow in due time, of its own accord; and in
-this case should I fail to gain the assent of those whose minds, being
-prepossessed by other principles, can no longer exercise an impartial
-judgment, still I have those with me who are able to distinguish the true
-from the untrue, if not in the present, at least in some future age.
-Truth is unique, and will speak for itself. Should any one undertake
-to impugn my sentiments, I have no wish to oppose him; but in case he
-desire it, I shall be happy to explain my principles and my reasons
-more at large. What need, however, is there of words? Let the thing
-speak for itself. If what I have said be true, why should I be eager to
-defend it? Surely truth can defend itself. If what I have said be false,
-it would be a degrading and silly task to defend it. Why then should I
-make myself an enemy of any one, or place myself in opposition to any
-one?” And again, in the “Economy,” he remarks: “Of what consequence is
-it to me that I should persuade any one to embrace my opinions? Let his
-own reason persuade him. I do not undertake this work for the sake of
-honor or emolument; both of which I shun rather than seek, because they
-disquiet the mind, and because I am content with my lot; but for the sake
-of truth, which alone is immortal.” These are long extracts, but they are
-well worthy of citation, alike for their own intrinsic truth and beauty,
-and for the illustration they afford of the spirit and sentiments of
-their author.
-
-The little thought he gave in after years to his scientific writings,
-and the little care he seemed to have lest the world should forget
-them, is very evident from his subsequent writings, in which they are
-scarcely alluded to. Some of the friends he made in the latter portion
-of his life, appear to have had very faint ideas of the extent of his
-achievements in natural science. Count Hopken, a very intimate friend of
-his, for many years, remarks: “Swedenborg made surprising discoveries in
-anatomy, which are recorded somewhere in certain literary Transactions.”
-Thus it appears that he was entirely ignorant of the existence of
-Swedenborg’s great work, the “Animal Kingdom.” What stronger proof could
-be given than this, of the sincerity with which the foregoing extracts
-were penned, in which he commits his works to the care of the God of
-truth, in humble acquiescence in whatever verdict his justice might
-pronounce.
-
-Great and manifold were the merits of these scientific works; yet we
-should, perhaps, do well to look upon them, as their author seems to
-have done, as school-boy exercises. Through the severe training and
-development of the whole powers of his mind, by the composition of these
-works, his Divine Master was fitting him to gaze upon the awful realities
-of the spiritual world, and to become a worthy exponent of the hidden
-wisdom of the Holy Scripture.
-
-It must, necessarily, be a matter of interest with many to know what
-were the religious opinions of Swedenborg at this period of his history.
-Occupying himself so intensely with natural science, it was hardly to be
-expected that theology could receive much of his attention. Among his
-posthumous papers, however, we find a little treatise on faith and good
-works, in which he comes to the wise conclusion that “there is no love
-to God if there be none to the neighbor;” or that “there is no faith if
-there be no works;” and therefore, that “faith without works is a phrase
-involving a contradiction.” Throughout all his scientific writings we
-find a simple and open assent to the primary truths of religion, and a
-constant endeavor to confirm some truth of religious doctrine by the
-natural facts which came under his notice. His religious views up to this
-time were generally such as the Christian world held, with here and there
-a quiet dissent as to particular points, and a strong tendency to eschew
-the merely theoretical and mystical belief, for the practical and active.
-We have his own testimony to the fact, that dogmatic and systematic
-theology formed no part of his otherwise extensive reading; and thus
-he came to the study of the Word of God unperverted by the sophisms
-of creed-makers. Of the gentle and earnest piety of his soul, we have
-striking proof in his “Rules of Life:”
-
-1. Often to read and meditate on the Word of God.
-
-2. To submit everything to the will of Divine Providence.
-
-3. To observe in everything a propriety of behaviour, and to keep the
-conscience clear.
-
-4. To discharge with fidelity the functions of my employment, and the
-duties of my office, and to render myself in all things useful to society.
-
-More need not be said on this head than that he kept these vows.
-
-We now close the first book of Swedenborg’s life, and open the second.
-Emphatically his was a double life. So rich in thought and action were
-both parts, that either would have been reckoned sufficient to render
-him a remarkable man. The one life was an orderly and regular growth out
-of the other: the first was a providential preparation for the second.
-Carefully disciplined by thought and investigation in the outer world,
-through a long series of laborious years, the curtain which separated the
-seen from the unseen was, for him, drawn aside, and his prepared eyes
-saw in clear sunlight those mysteries of life and spirit, which the best
-and wisest of men have most ardently desired to see. Let us, then, leave
-Swedenborg the Man of Science, and turn to him as the Servant of the Lord
-Jesus Christ, the worthy exponent of the spiritual sense of the Word of
-God, and the announcer of the New Era in which reason and faith are to be
-at one, and men everywhere friends and brothers.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER VIII.
-
- _His Spiritual Sight opened, and the Conditions of his
- Seership._
-
-
-We will now proceed, without circumlocution, to lay before our readers,
-in all its fullness, the claim which Swedenborg made, at this period,
-to open intercourse with the spiritual world, under the sanction and
-protection of the Lord. This assumption runs through the whole of his
-after life, and without a clear idea of its nature and conditions, we
-shall be unable rightly to appreciate aught else that follows. In one of
-his letters, he says, “I have been called to a holy office by the Lord
-himself, who most graciously manifested himself to me, his servant, in
-the year 1743, when he opened my sight to a view of the spiritual world,
-and granted me the privilege of conversing with spirits and angels, which
-I enjoy to this day. From that time, I began to print and publish various
-arcana that have been seen by me, or revealed to me; as respecting
-heaven and hell, the state of man after death, the true worship of God,
-the spiritual sense of the Word, with many other most important matters
-conducive to salvation and true wisdom.” Again, in the preface to his
-work entitled, “Arcana Cœlestia,” he writes: “Of the Lord’s Divine
-mercy, it has been granted me now for several years to be constantly and
-uninterruptedly in company with spirits and angels, hearing them converse
-with each other, and conversing with them. Hence it has been permitted
-me to hear and see stupendous things in the other life, which have never
-before come to the knowledge of any man, nor entered his imagination.
-I have there been instructed concerning different kinds of spirits, and
-the state of souls after death; concerning hell, or the lamentable state
-of the unfaithful; concerning heaven, or the most happy state of the
-faithful; and particularly concerning the doctrine of faith which is
-acknowledged throughout all heaven.”
-
-We are aware that these pretensions will be received by many with
-ridicule, and by some with contempt, arising from a distaste for
-spiritual subjects; while by a few they will be treated with respectful
-attention. All that we ask, is, a little patience; and to readers of
-every class, we would say,—Do not be hasty; do not prejudge the matter;
-condemn not till you are conversant with the whole circumstances of
-the case. Swedenborg’s claim, we admit, does appear startling; but to
-greet its announcement with the laugh of scepticism, and to deny its
-validity, as many do, without an attempt at examination, is anything but
-philosophical—is anything but righteous.
-
-No reader of this sketch can have failed to perceive the high
-philosophical genius, and perfect truthfulness of Swedenborg; and
-all must agree with us in believing that wilful deception was an
-impossibility with such a man. No explanation of what Swedenborg himself
-calls the opening of his spiritual sight, can be offered, that is more
-transparently ridiculous than that of imposture. The degree of vehemence
-with which some have preferred this charge against him, may be taken as
-an accurate index of their ignorance of the man, or of their inability to
-discern a truthful and earnest spirit.
-
-No denial of the possibility of such spiritual vision as is claimed by
-Swedenborg, can be accepted from the Christian. Such denial is alone the
-privilege of the professed materialist. We all know how much of our loved
-and common faith rests on claims that are quite as startling as those
-of Swedenborg. From the visions of Abraham to those of John in Patmos,
-the whole Scriptural narrative is interwoven with supernatural incident.
-Now, how is it that we yield such ready faith to whatever is related
-in Scripture, however marvelous, and have so much wonder to spare over
-the unbelieving Jews? The Rev. O. Prescott Hiller, in a short memoir of
-Swedenborg, prefixed to a collection of “Gems” from his writings, has
-some very apposite remarks on this subject. He says: “Swedenborg states
-that there are three heavens; so does Paul, for he speaks of the ‘third
-heaven.’ Swedenborg affirms, calmly, that his spiritual senses were
-opened and elevated in such a manner that he might have a perception of
-that state of existence, and see and hear what is there. So does Paul.
-Swedenborg states that he had, in spirit, been permitted to behold the
-Lord: so does Paul:—‘Have I not seen,’ said he, ‘Jesus Christ our Lord?’
-(1 Cor. ix. 1.) Thus parallel are the cases. But, exclaims the prejudiced
-observer: ‘Paul! Paul! Paul was an apostle! Paul was one of the founders
-of the Christian Church! Paul lived eighteen hundred years ago! There
-are no visions now-a-days! The case is entirely different!’ To these
-exclamations it may be replied: Your last remark is but a begging of the
-question under consideration. We affirm that though indeed unfrequent,
-yet there are occasionally spiritual visions in these times, as well
-as in former, and that there is good and very strong testimony that a
-remarkable case of the kind exists in the instance of this philosopher,
-Swedenborg, not by any means on account of his own declaration merely,
-but from the nature of the truths and statements brought forth by him, of
-which our own minds, enlightened, we trust, by reason and God’s Word, are
-the judges. The burden of proof—it may be continued in answer—falls upon
-you to show by what law of Divine order, by what change in the character
-and structure of man’s mind, a spiritual vision can not exist now, as
-well as in the time of Paul,—in the eighteenth or nineteenth, as well as
-in the first century. The truth is, antiquity has a wonderful charm for
-the mind, and a great power over it: ‘distance lends enchantment to the
-view.’ It is not difficult to believe anything, however wonderful, to
-have taken place in that misty and mysterious region, the distant _past_;
-but now in these dull, common times, to believe such strange things to
-be capable of happening, seems absurd. But do you not suppose that those
-times, to the men then living, appeared as dull and common-place as our
-times to us? Did not the regardless rain fall on Paul’s head, as well as
-on yours and mine? and this very sun and moon light his steps as well
-as ours? Did not Paul, do you think, rise often in the morning with a
-heavy heart, and after breakfast, go forth to his duties, or sit down to
-write his epistles, sad and oppressed in spirit, dejected at the thought
-of the heavy responsibilities upon him, and awed with the idea that he
-must address the Athenians to-morrow? And when at length he stood before
-them and began, did they not ask: ‘Who is this?’ Think you that gaping
-crowd knew anything about any great and celebrated Paul, whose name has
-become so familiar to our ears? They had not heard of such a person.
-‘And some said, What will this babbler say? others, He seemeth to be a
-setter forth of strange gods; because he preached to them Jesus, and the
-resurrection. And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some
-mocked; and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter. Howbeit
-certain men clave unto him, and believed; among whom was Dionysius the
-Areopagite, and a woman named Damaris, and others with them.’ (Acts xvii.
-16-34.) Here we have a picture of human nature, as it was, and as it
-still is. A new person comes forward, a stranger, unheard of before, and
-utters strange ideas, something new and unusual, something different
-from what men have been accustomed to hear, and think of, and believe;
-most of the hearers jeer and mock, and turn away, calling him a babbler;
-some are rather pleased at some things they have heard, but the interest
-has not taken sufficient hold of them to make them anxious to pursue the
-subject farther just now, and they go away and forget what they have
-heard; a few, whose minds were in a receptive state, whose hearts had
-been prepared, perhaps, by torturing doubts, and secret meditations, and
-by trials and sufferings of spirit—these at once perceive and seize upon
-the truths they have heard, clasp them to their bosoms as something long
-looked for, as precious treasure, and go away rejoicing in their new
-faith, and resolved to sell all they have and follow the Lord. Gradually
-the truth spreads; these few tell what they have heard to others, their
-friends, who they know have been troubled with similar doubts and
-difficulties. By and by these believers meet together and form a little
-congregation, and appoint the ablest of their number to preach to them in
-regard to these new truths, both for their own fuller instruction and for
-the information of strangers. Years roll away. It becomes an established
-religious society. Similar societies in neighboring cities league with
-them; and they form a General Church, which begins to have a name—the
-‘Christian Church.’ Ages roll on, and this becomes a vast establishment,
-extending over whole nations, and reaching to distant quarters of the
-globe. This Paul, who was once a nameless preacher, ‘a babbler,’ and
-‘mad,’ is now looked back upon with the utmost veneration; his words are
-oracles of truth; whatever he affirmed, whether in regard to himself or
-others, is implicitly believed. Custom, general acceptance, the belief of
-ages, undoubting confidence in the opinions of our parents and friends,
-all go to render the mind perfectly ready to believe those things.
-Faith is now an easy and natural thing, and we wonder at those strange
-and hard-hearted unbelievers of Paul’s own time, who had the glorious
-opportunity of listening to him with their own ears. ‘Oh! that we could
-have enjoyed such an opportunity,’ exclaim many, ‘how gladly would we
-have listened!’
-
-“But these persons know not what they say, nor the nature of the human
-mind. If they are so anxious to have such an opportunity, so ready to
-be tested, and to show that they would have discernment enough to see
-genuine truth, though heard for the first time, and to acknowledge
-a great teacher and apostle, though yet unknown to the world—that
-opportunity is now before them. A Paul is again preaching to the
-Athenians and to the world. A great teacher is again uttering new and
-sublime truths. The Lord Himself has come a second time, not in Person,
-but in Spirit; not as the ‘Word made flesh,’ as before, but as the
-essential Word, by the opening of the interior truth—the _spiritual
-sense_—which it contains. Those who believe, that, had they been on
-earth, they would have acknowledged the Lord at His First Coming, or
-would have readily received the teachings of His Apostles, have now the
-opportunity of making trial of their faith; of showing whether they are
-able to overcome the inveteracy of custom, the natural opposition of
-prejudice, the fear of public opinion, the love of the world and its
-powers and pleasures, (all which difficulties the first Christians had
-to encounter,) whether, in the face of all these, they can, looking for
-the truth with a single eye, discern it now at its feeble dawn; and,
-advancing steadily and earnestly towards it, be among the first to hail
-the rising day.”
-
-What more can be said on the subject? The Christian has no choice but to
-acknowledge, or refute, Swedenborg’s claims on the ground of their own
-intrinsic merit.
-
-Swedenborg was gifted with peculiar powers of respiration. From early
-childhood, when on his knees at prayer, and afterwards when engaged in
-profound meditation, he found that his natural respiration was for the
-time suspended. As we have seen in his work on the “Animal Kingdom,”
-his attention to the correspondence between thought and respiration had
-been of long continuance,—probably from the fact that his own system
-supplied him with such constant illustrations of its nature. This power
-of suspended respiration under deep thought, common to all men, was
-preternaturally developed in Swedenborg. At this period he discovered
-the use to which these peculiar powers of his were to be applied; for
-he writes: “My respiration has been so formed by the Lord, as to enable
-me to breathe inwardly for a long period of time, without the aid of
-the external air; my respiration being directed within, and my outward
-senses, as well as actions, still continuing in their vigor, which is
-only possible with persons who have been so formed by the Lord. I have
-also been instructed that my breathing was so directed, without my being
-aware of it, in order to enable me to be with spirits, and to speak with
-them.” Those who have studied mesmerism and clairvoyance know many facts
-that confirm and illustrate this position of Swedenborg’s with regard to
-respiration; and it is quite evident that the Hindoo Yogi are capable
-of a similar state. There is this great difference, however, between
-such instances and the case of Swedenborg, that his powers were natural,
-and continuous in their exercise, and not sought after and induced by
-himself; while theirs are only occasional, and are frequently brought
-about by artificial means.
-
-Swedenborg’s intromission into the spiritual world was a gradual process;
-and for this reason the date of his illumination is variously given,
-ranging between 1743 and 1745. It appears, however, that he came into the
-full exercise of his spiritual seership while living in London.
-
-Of late years it has become common to talk of Swedenborg as a
-clairvoyant, to associate him with mesmeric subjects, and make him a
-kinsman of French and American spiritualists, such as Cahagnet, and
-Andrew Jackson Davis. This mistake is made through ignorance. It is a
-law of the spiritual world that every man is associated with his like.
-Supposing, therefore, that any man’s spiritual sight were opened, he
-would come into conjunction only with spirits like himself; that is,
-with those who would echo his own ideas and opinions, and repeat his own
-feelings. It is evident, then, that in such a case the nature of the
-revelations are entirely dependent upon the character of the revelator,
-and in all cases must be suspiciously received by the lover of truth.
-Now Swedenborg claims to have been under the special protection of the
-Lord, and to have received the doctrines he promulgated directly from
-Him, and not in any case from spirits. Of course, every one will decide
-for himself as to how far he can receive this assertion; but it is well
-that all should be informed of the precise character of Swedenborg’s
-claim, and of his own testimony as to the source of his information. In
-his Diary, written about this time, he says, that “spirits narrate things
-wholly false, and lie. When spirits begin to speak with man, care should
-be taken not to believe them; for almost everything they say is made
-up by them, and they lie; so that if it were permitted them to relate
-what heaven is, and how things are in heaven, they would tell so many
-falsehoods, and with such strong assertion, that man would be astonished;
-wherefore it was not permitted me, when spirits were speaking, to have
-any belief in what they stated. They love to feign. Whatever may be the
-topic spoken of, they think they know it, and form different opinions
-about it, altogether as if they knew; and if man then listens and
-believes, they insist, and in various ways deceive and seduce.”
-
-Any one who has paid attention to the phenomena of spirit-rapping, and
-to the communications received through clairvoyants from the world of
-spirits, and has observed the very Babel of contradictions uttered by
-these “mediums,” will be able to appreciate the truth of the passage we
-have quoted, as well as our desire to draw a broad and distinct line
-between such and Swedenborg.
-
-It is a very natural question, and one often put by those unconversant
-with the nature of spiritual intercourse, how it happens that such a
-man as Swedenborg, sitting quietly in his chair, could see and speak
-with angels and spirits, and travel through vast spaces in the spiritual
-world. It is thus: Space and time are attributes of matter alone. Their
-appearances do, indeed, exist in the spiritual world, but not as the
-fixed and mensurable things of our material sphere. Did not our subject
-forbid digression, it would be easy to bring this truth down to the
-comprehension of every one, by reference to a few items of experience
-which must at some time have fallen to the lot of all. We are all, as
-to our minds, in constant, though insensible, communion with spirits;
-and from them we receive thoughts and feelings of every kind. A good man
-and a wicked man may be, as to the body, in the same room, while between
-their minds there may be the wide gulf that separated Dives and Lazarus.
-Now if the spiritual sight of these two men were opened, where would they
-be? One would be in heaven, and the other in hell; and that, too, without
-either moving from the place where he stood. It was in virtue of this
-principle of the spirit’s perfect independence of space, that Swedenborg,
-under the Divine guidance and protection, was led through spiritual
-societies of all kinds: and in his various works we have the record of
-the wondrous things thus heard and seen.
-
-Again, it may be asked: What is the nature of this spiritual sight so
-often referred to? In the words of Paul we answer: “There is a natural
-body, and there is a spiritual body;” and, as a consequence, there is a
-natural sight, and there is a spiritual sight. The natural body lives
-from the spiritual body, and derives its form and parts from it. The
-natural body is the instrument of the spiritual body, and through it as
-a medium, it is enabled to exist in this lower world, and in constant
-contact with matter. Now it is possible for the spiritual body to be
-raised partially above the natural body, without causing death, or
-the entire withdrawal of its life from the natural body. This partial
-withdrawal of the spiritual body, and the enjoyment of sight in the
-spiritual world, is what is meant by the opening of the spiritual sight.
-Time forbids us to draw upon the innumerable illustrations of this fact
-which the history of the past and the experience of the present, in
-conjunction with the Word of God, afford. Let one instance from the Bible
-suffice. In 2 Kings, vii. 8-17, we read that Elisha, compassed about with
-horses, chariots, and a great host, sent by the king of Syria to seize
-him, was on a mountain with his servant, who, full of terror, exclaimed:
-“Alas! my master, how shall we do? And he answered, Fear not, for they
-that be with us are more than they that be with them. And Elisha prayed
-and said, Lord, I pray thee _open his eyes_, that he may see. And the
-Lord _opened the eyes_ of the young man, and he _saw_: and behold, the
-mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha.”
-Here is a case quite to the point. The natural eyes of the young man were
-already open; for how otherwise could he have seen the Syrian host, and
-have been afraid? Elisha prayed that his eyes might be opened. What eyes?
-Why, clearly, the eyes of his spiritual body; which done, he was enabled
-to perceive the heavenly guardianship which was extended over his master.
-Every one will now understand what we mean, when we shall have occasion
-to speak of the opening of man’s spiritual sight.
-
-Having thus defined the conditions of Swedenborg’s spiritual vision, and
-cleared away some questions which, if answered, would have impeded our
-narrative, we will now proceed with our history.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER IX.
-
- _Prepares for his New Office—Resigns his Assessorship—His
- “Adversaria”—His “Spiritual Diary”—The Death of Polheim._
-
-
-Called to a high and holy office, Swedenborg set about preparing himself
-for the fulfilment of its duties. Leaving London in the beginning of
-July, 1745, he took ship for Sweden, where he arrived on the 7th of
-August. On this voyage, his spiritual intercourse was suspended. He lived
-quietly at home during 1746; probably in the performance and enjoyment
-of the settled routine of his Assessorship, and in earnest meditation on
-the heavenly arcana now fully opened to his view. In 1747, in order that
-he might be more at liberty to devote himself to the mission to which
-the Lord had called him, he asked leave of King Frederick to retire from
-his Assessorship, and that he might enjoy, during life, as a retiring
-pension, half of his official salary; requesting, at the same time, that
-no addition to his rank or title might be conferred upon him. The King
-yielded to his wishes; but in consideration of his long and faithful
-service of thirty-one years, continued to him the whole of his salary.
-
-Meanwhile, he learned Hebrew, and read the Bible through several times in
-its original languages. Like all true students, he read and thought with
-pen in hand; and as the hidden and Divine wisdom of the Word was opened
-to him, he embodied in “Adversaria,” or notes, the truths thus revealed.
-These Adversaria extend over the historical books of the Old Testament,
-and several of the prophets. They have all been printed of late years,
-from their author’s original Latin manuscript, by that indefatigable
-and learned Newchurchman, Dr. Tafel, of Tübingen. They have not yet
-been translated into English, probably because they were not published
-by Swedenborg himself, and are only to be regarded as preparatory
-studies for future works. They also abound with indistinct views on many
-subjects, which subsequent knowledge rendered clear. As records of their
-author’s spiritual progress, as well as for the many valuable facts which
-they contain, it is to be hoped that the day is not far distant when the
-“Adversaria” will appear in an English dress. We cannot spare anything
-which serves to illustrate the mental history of such a man as Swedenborg.
-
-In 1747, he ceased writing his “Adversaria,” and commenced a Spiritual
-Diary, which he continued for twenty years. This Diary, written also in
-Latin, (as all his theological works were,) has been lately published
-by Dr. Tafel in ten closely printed octavos. Two volumes have been
-translated and published in England and America, and the remainder will
-probably soon follow. It will hardly be necessary for us to go into a
-detailed account of the principles and facts scattered throughout its
-long and miscellaneous record. We shall meet with all the leading ideas
-in noticing the books published by himself, and laid before the world
-as matured and finished productions. It may be said, however, that the
-“Diary,” as a work, is perfectly unique; for in no literature can we
-find its counterpart. We have in it, for twenty years, an almost daily
-record of Swedenborg’s spiritual states and temptations; his interviews
-and conversations with angels, spirits, and devils; and accounts of
-their pleasures, punishments, and thoughts. No one who makes an intimate
-acquaintance with this “Diary,” will ever after allow a shadow of doubt
-to cross his mind as to the candor and truth of Swedenborg; for in
-every page, he will perceive that quiet and solemn earnestness which
-belongs alone to the upright and honest in heart. In its whole range
-of experience, he will detect no vanity, shuffling, double-dealing,
-or anything inconsistent with his published works; but all as
-straightforward, open, and unreserved, as truth itself. Although written
-in the quietude of his own study, and for his own eye and use alone, he
-could not have been more ingenuous and sincere had the whole universe
-been looking down upon its pages.
-
-On the page of history, the “Diary” throws some wondrous light. In it,
-we read of interviews with many of the famous men of ancient and modern
-times. From some names which the world has learned to revere, the mask
-of excellence is quite torn away, while the infamy of others is proved
-to have been but judgment from appearance, and from scandal. Any one
-who is infected with the spiritual disease of hero-worship, should read
-the “Spiritual Diary.” He will there discover that the most dazzling
-intellect fades into moping idiocy and insanity, when it lacks the
-sterling heart, and honest aim; and that goodness alone is the life and
-soul of true wisdom. He will also learn why it is so.
-
-We would here say a word upon a jest started by Emerson, (and which has
-re-appeared under many forms,) to the effect that all the souls with
-whom Swedenborg held converse, talked Swedenborgese. In reply, we would
-ask, how they could speak in any other way? Swedenborg did not profess
-to be a mimic; and if Cicero or anybody else spoke with him in the
-spiritual world and in the spiritual language, Swedenborg, in translating
-the speech into his own simple diction, would, of course, seize the
-substance, and care nothing for the form. That the language was not
-Cicero’s, might be true; but if the ideas were, what matter? The subject
-would hardly be worth mentioning, did we not see the jest receiving a
-wide currency; but a few words of common sense are all that are necessary
-to take the life out of it.
-
-There is no work with which we are acquainted, that can give its readers
-a better idea of the reality of the future life, than the “Spiritual
-Diary.” No other book, we know, can so stir up a man to set his mind,
-or spiritual house, in order here, so that he may be spared the turmoil
-and sorrow which otherwise he will encounter beyond the tomb. In its
-pages, the life after death is portrayed in all its stern reality; not
-as a vague dream, or a shadowy vision, of which the mind can form no
-fixed idea. We read of the awful states induced in the other life, by
-evil habits contracted in this; from loose speech, jesting upon sacred
-subjects, indulgence in idleness and luxury, down to blacker crimes.
-We learn from sight, as it were, how evil is its own torment, and how
-goodness is its own sweet and rich reward; and in view of the momentous
-issues of what we too often regard as the trifles of life, we feel
-impelled to make our peace and heaven here, that we may bear them with us
-into the Hereafter. Such high uses does the “Spiritual Diary” subserve.
-
-The “Diary” is, however, a work not suited for an early student
-of Swedenborg. The principles upon which it is written, not being
-understood, a young reader could hardly fail to form erroneous ideas from
-it, and misjudge the work itself. It is only after some acquaintance
-with the spiritual laws expounded in Swedenborg’s theological writings,
-that it can be read with profit. Incidents, which, at first sight, might
-appear ridiculous and irrational, are brought within the pale of reason
-and belief when the laws upon which they are founded are understood; and
-as effects, not causes, constitute the burden of the “Diary,” the need
-of this caution will be apparent. When, however, the laws of spiritual
-life are understood, the “Diary” becomes a work of peculiar and most
-profitable instruction.
-
-While Swedenborg was living in Sweden, in 1751, his old friend and
-coadjutor, Polheim, died; and Swedenborg was favored with a view of
-_both_ sides of his grave. Writing in his “Spiritual Diary,” he says:
-“Polheim died on Monday, and spoke with me on Thursday. I was invited to
-the funeral. He saw the hearse, the attendants, and the whole procession.
-He also saw them let down the coffin into the grave, and conversed with
-me while it was going on, asking me why they buried him, when he was
-alive. And when the priest pronounced that he would rise again at the
-day of judgment, he asked why this was, when he had already risen. He
-wondered that such a belief should prevail, considering that he was even
-now alive; he also wondered at the belief in the resurrection of the
-body, for he said he felt that he was in the body: with other remarks.”
-Such a relation will seem strange, very strange to many. But have
-patience. When the laws and principles upon which such phenomena take
-place, are comprehended, all their strangeness and improbability will
-straightway disappear.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER X.
-
- _The Arcana Cœlestia._
-
-
-It was about the middle of 1749, that Swedenborg made his first
-appearance as a theologian, by the publication of the first volume of
-the “Arcana Cœlestia.” At the beginning of 1750, we find his publisher,
-John Lewis, of Paternoster Row, announcing the issue of the second
-volume, in cheap numbers, both in English and Latin. The issue continued
-in volumes till 1756, when the work was completed in eight good sized
-quartos. His publisher states in one of his advertisements, that though
-he is “positively forbid to discover the author’s name, yet he hopes to
-be excused for mentioning his benign and generous qualities.” He avers
-that “this gentleman, with indefatigable pains and labor, spent one whole
-year in studying and writing out the first volume of the ‘Arcana,’ was at
-the expense of £200 to print it, and advanced £200 more for the printing
-of the second; and when he had done this, he gave express orders that
-all the money that should arise in the sale, should be given towards the
-charge of the propagation of the gospel. He is so far from desiring to
-make a gain of his labors, that he will not receive one farthing back
-of the £400 he has expended; and for that reason his works will come
-exceedingly cheap to the public.”
-
-The “Arcana Cœlestia” is an exposition of the books of Genesis and
-Exodus, with intervening chapters which describe the wonders of the
-future life. At the outset, it will be necessary to state that
-Swedenborg believed the Bible to be the Word of God. “Well, what
-Christian does not believe so?” it may be asked. Few expressions pass
-more glibly over the lips of religious people, than the short phrase,
-“the word of God;” but how many take time to consider its infinite
-meaning? The Word of God—a production of the infinite Father of all, the
-Creator and Sustainer of the universe,—must be infinitely superior to any
-human composition; and, like God’s other volume, the book of nature, must
-yield up fresh wonders to every investigator; and the more it is searched
-into, the more real unceasing beauties of wisdom and design, till at
-length the strained intellect of man finds its truest wisdom lies in the
-deepest humility and adoration. Thus logically thinking, we experience
-a serious reverse when we turn to the opinions expressed regarding the
-Word by even its most reverential commentators. At no period of history
-has the Bible been submitted to more earnest study than in these times;
-but the results have been in the highest degree meagre and unworthy,
-when placed in comparison with the same exercise of mind on the subjects
-of natural creation. We have most elaborate and minute criticisms on
-the sacred text; we have treatises on the animals, the insects, and the
-vegetables mentioned in the hallowed record; we have books filled with
-descriptions of domestic life among the Jews, their customs, and their
-language; the prophecies have been subjected to all manner of ingenious
-interpretation, but after all, with the poorest spiritual results, and
-such as can in no wise excite a deeper respect, or a warmer love, for
-God’s holy Word, than was entertained centuries ago, when such learning
-was a rarer thing. Yet if we believe that God inspired this Book, can we
-for a moment suppose that it should have no other end than the narration
-of the history of a petty people, and the enunciation of dark prophecies,
-which the acutest of men pronounce impenetrable mysteries, and which
-the daring and the foolish turn to all manner of profane purposes in
-political soothsayings? If the Bible be indeed the Word of God, it must
-contain within itself much more than the majority of Christians suppose;
-otherwise it presents a most startling anomaly when viewed in comparison
-with the other Divine work, the natural universe.
-
-The assumption, then, with which Swedenborg starts, is, that the
-Scripture is in very truth the Word of God; that every syllable and
-expression therein are His; that Moses, David, the prophets, and the
-Evangelists, were simply the inspired penmen, who wrote implicitly
-according to Divine dictation.
-
-He teaches, moreover, that the Word does not belong to men alone, but
-is the possession likewise of the angels of heaven, to whom it wears
-different forms according to the degree of their love and intelligence.
-In general, it may be said to have three senses, or meanings; first,
-a celestial sense, apprehended by the celestial or highest angels;
-secondly, a spiritual sense, apprehended by a lower range of angelic
-minds, the spiritual; and thirdly, a natural sense, with which we are
-all familiar, written down to the comprehension of the lowest, most
-worldly, and sensual of men—the Jews. These three senses make one
-by correspondence; although diverse, they are still harmonious, and
-connected by one divine life.
-
-The Word, moreover, we are taught, has worn different garments, or
-varied natural senses, at different eras. The first church, Adam, or the
-primeval race of men, did not possess a written Word, but were gifted
-with a perception of spiritual essences. Nature was literally spread
-before them as an open book. To them, Nature was the expression of the
-Divine Wisdom; and they saw in every beast of the forest, in every
-flower of the field, and in every scene of creation, evidence of the
-Divine presence, and material emblems of spiritual and heavenly things.
-As men declined from purity, and, together with their innocence, lost
-their wisdom and their powers of celestial perception, a written Word
-became necessary, accommodated to the changed state of the new spiritual
-church called Noah. In time, this Word had also to be withdrawn, for
-its purity and language transcended the apprehension of a falling and
-sensualised world. Yet this Ancient Word, Swedenborg tells us, is not
-lost, but still exists in Tartary, probably as an unvalued treasure,
-which may be restored to the church in due season. To this Ancient Word,
-we have two allusions in the Jewish Scriptures; the first in Numbers
-xxi. 14, where we read: “Wherefore it is said in the book of the _Wars
-of Jehovah_;” and the second in Joshua x. 13: “Is not this written in
-the book of _Jasher_?” The book of the Wars of Jehovah, and the book
-of Jasher, forming parts of the Ancient Word, became unintelligible
-from being written in high correspondential and emblematic language;
-and uninteresting because not associated with the personal and worldly
-interests of men. The Jewish Scriptures were then written. The Divine
-Wisdom clothed itself in such words, histories, and laws, as the
-earthly-minded Jews could love and reverence, and thus be kept, in some
-measure, in connection with heaven, and in the possession of the most
-general and leading truths of religion. The Gospels, added in the course
-of time to the Jewish Word, served still further to preserve the church
-in union with heaven and the Lord. But now we see that mankind having in
-the course of centuries re-ascended to a higher degree of intellectual
-life, begin to be dissatisfied with the Scriptures, to arraign the truth
-of science against them, to wonder how it is possible that such writings
-can be the Word of God, and to ask, with Emerson, “What have I to do with
-jasper and sardonyx, beryl and chalcedony, what with arks and passovers,
-ephahs, heave-offerings, and unleavened bread; what with chariots of
-fire, and ephods; what with lepers and emerods; what with dragons crowned
-and horned, behemoth and unicorn?” But the Lord anticipates all man’s
-wants; and, caring above all things for his spiritual well-being, never
-permits him to live without a witness of His love and designs towards
-him. By His Word, the Lord reveals himself to man; and without it, man
-could know nothing of God, of heaven and hell, and of a life after death.
-How necessary then it is that man be preserved from falling into contempt
-of its teachings; and yet if it contains no other than a literal sense,
-what can a Christian say in reply to such questionings as those above
-quoted? and what tenable theory can be advanced to meet the objections of
-the sceptic drawn from geology, astronomy, and many other sciences which
-clash with the letter of Scripture? In the “Arcana Cœlestia,” we find
-a solution of all such doubts in the clear manifestation of the Divine
-authorship of the Word, through the revelation of its spiritual sense,
-whereby reason and faith are perfectly conjoined; and man, while here
-below, is fed with angels’ food.
-
-But it is not to be concluded from this that Swedenborg in any way
-slights or undervalues the literal sense of the Word. Far from it. He
-says: “The literal sense of the Word is the basis, the continent, and
-the firmament of its spiritual and celestial senses; and hence in it the
-divine truth is in its fulness, its sanctity, and its power; therefore
-the doctrine of the church should be drawn from the literal sense, and
-confirmed thereby.” From this, every one will see that no mysticism can
-be sheltered under a belief in the spiritual sense of the Word; for, from
-the literal sense, determined by the severest criticism, all doctrine
-must be drawn, and all creeds tested. Swedenborg also teaches, that by
-means of the literal sense, men enjoy conjunction with the Lord; for
-His divine spirit is with all who read his Word devoutly. To promote
-this divine communion, the letter of Scripture has been so framed as to
-possess a universal interest. The child reads the Bible, and is delighted
-with its charming stories; the simple cottager loves it and prizes it as
-he prizes no other book; the poet draws from it his richest inspirations;
-and the man of learning, who has gathered knowledge from all times and
-lands, turns to its hallowed page, and in the light of its divine wisdom
-sees himself but a child in knowledge.
-
-Though the Scriptures are thus marvellously adapted, in the literal
-sense, to the tastes, feelings, and necessities of men of all grades
-and states, yet, as before said, many portions of them do, in our days,
-require to be vindicated from the charge of being inconsistent with
-science—from the charge of insignificance, and dealing in petty details.
-They need, in fine, to be elevated from mere history, poetry, and
-obsolete law, into practical use and connection with the daily life and
-conduct of every man and woman; so that they may be to us, in very deed,
-the Word of God, as truly as they were to the Jews three thousand years
-ago.
-
-Let us now see how, in the “Arcana Cœlestia,” all this is effected.
-
-“From the posterity of the most Ancient Church, Moses received what he
-wrote concerning the creation, the Garden of Eden, etc., down to the
-time of Abraham,” writes Swedenborg. Describing the method by which the
-people of that church expressed themselves, he adds: “When they mentioned
-earthly and worldly things, they thought of the spiritual and celestial
-things which they represented; so that they not only expressed themselves
-by representatives, but also _reduced their thoughts into a kind of
-series, as of historical particulars_, in order to give them more life;
-and in this they found their greatest delight.” Understanding this
-fully, we shall not be surprised to learn that the first eleven chapters
-of Genesis are _purely allegorical_; written not as a description of the
-creation of the material world, and its fortunes, but as a description
-of the internal life of the earliest people, of the development of their
-minds up to celestial perfection, and then of their gradual declension
-from purity, their love of the evil and the false, and finally the
-destruction of their souls, symbolized by the deluge overspreading the
-face of the whole earth. These chapters were thus written by the Lord
-in accommodation to the tastes of the men of the Ancient Church, who,
-as we read, had “their greatest delight in the expression of spiritual
-and celestial things in a series of historical particulars;” just as, in
-after times, He clothed His Wisdom in Jewish history and law, so that
-He might be with the Jews, and preserve within them some small remains
-of spiritual life. What a relief to the mind, torn and troubled with
-the thousand doubts which science has cast upon the early chapters of
-Genesis, is the acceptation of the truth of their entirely allegorical
-signification! And how plainly, in their spiritual sense, do we find
-testimony of their divine authorship! It should not be forgotten that
-the doctrine of the symbolical nature of these chapters, was set forth
-by Swedenborg long before science had demonstrated that their merely
-literal sense was wholly irreconcilable with the facts of nature; thus
-quite independently of any external pressure or necessity. It must be
-known to every one that geology—the science which, above all others,
-has brought the most weighty objections against the six days’ creation,
-and the deluge of the whole earth by a flood which covered the tops of
-the highest mountains,—is a new science. At the time when Swedenborg
-wrote, it was entirely undeveloped. The reconciling of the literal
-sense of these chapters with the facts of geology, has perplexed more
-minds, and engaged more intellect, than did ever perpetual motion and
-the squaring of the circle. The amount of speculation which has been
-expended upon this theme, is immense, as every one at all acquainted with
-the religious history of the last fifty years is aware; and still the
-labor is vigorously prosecuted. We have no inclination to undervalue the
-motives that prompt to it. For all sincere lovers of the Word of God we
-entertain the deepest respect, and rejoice to think that their faith in
-the Bible remains unshaken amid such fiery trials. Yet if Christians were
-wise and unprejudiced, they would turn to Swedenborg’s “Arcana Cœlestia,”
-and there find all that heart or mind could wish. Its readers, who have
-been many, (and yet, when compared with the wide world of Christendom,
-insignificantly few,) have had, during all these seasons of doubt, the
-fullest peace; and have been ready to welcome every truth of science,
-however militating against the literal sense of the early chapters of
-Genesis; and all the while have remained such lovers of the Word as
-none but believers in its spiritual sense can be. We believe that the
-religious world will, in process of time, when all methods of reconciling
-the letter of Scripture with geology shall have manifestly failed,
-finally turn to Swedenborg; and when the heavenly truth glowing in his
-pages shall beam upon their opened sight, they will wonder why they did
-not read his luminous volumes sooner.
-
-From the Call of Abram, the Word is to be looked upon as a narration of
-historical events. Yet while, as history, it possesses a great charm and
-interest to every mind, from its matchless and beautiful simplicity, we
-cannot see what claim it could have to the title of the Word of God, did
-it not contain within itself, as Swedenborg abundantly demonstrates, a
-spiritual sense, universally applicable to men in all states, times, and
-situations. In the highest or celestial sense, the Word refers solely
-to the Lord, and is a description of his nature and attributes, of his
-assumption of corrupt humanity, and the process of its glorification. Man
-being formed in the Lord’s image and likeness, whatever treats of Him,
-is, in a secondary sense, or in a lower degree, descriptive of man, his
-nature and regeneration. This secondary application of the Word forms its
-spiritual sense, which when understood, transforms Genesis and Exodus
-from mere history and dull ceremonial law, into a Divine revelation of
-the laws of spiritual life, pregnant with practical benefit to all men,
-because applicable to every incident and thought of life.
-
-Time and space would alike fail were we to attempt to give the most
-general outline of the multitude of spiritual truths which are unveiled
-in the course of the exposition of Genesis and Exodus; and not of these
-two books alone, but of passages from all parts of the Word, which are
-drawn upon to illustrate and confirm the truth of the interpretation.
-As Wilkinson says, “Consider, gentle reader, twelve goodly 8vo volumes
-[in English,] written with such continued power that it seems as if
-eating, drinking, and sleeping, had never intervened between the penman
-and his page, so unbroken is the subject, and so complete the sense. Add
-to the other health and harmony of this unflagging man, a memory of the
-most extraordinary grasp, which enabled him to administer the details
-of an intellect ranging through all truth on the one hand, and through
-the whole field of Scripture illustration and text upon the other. Then
-take into account the unity of the work from first to last; the constant
-reference that binds all parts of it together, and shows the caution
-with which each strong affirmation is at first set down. Observe also
-the felicity of phrase, the happiness of mind, the easy greatness, which
-shine along and dignify those serious pages. Remark also, that the author
-does not deal in generalities, but sentence for sentence, and word for
-word, he translates his text into spiritual meaning, and criticises and
-supports himself with nearly every parallel text in the sacred writings.”
-
-The earnest reader of the “Arcana” will never question the reality of
-Swedenborg’s mission. He would as soon question the reality of the world,
-or his own existence. This is a strong assertion, a stranger to the work
-will perhaps say; but it is only a stranger to these wondrous volumes
-that will say so; for every one at all familiar with them will agree with
-us. We never take down a volume of the “Arcana” to read, without feeling
-more and more assured that Swedenborg was an anointed servant of the
-Lord. The depths of spiritual experience he reveals, his insight into the
-inmost recesses of the heart, his explanation of the causes of thoughts,
-and the origin of our various desires and inclinations, of lowness of
-spirits, of pleasant and dull moods, in short, of all spiritual trials
-and temptations, with the heavenly ends they are permitted to serve,
-together with a thousand other matters which it concerns us all to know,
-are of such a nature that we cannot but feel that such knowledge must
-have been derived from a Divine source, and that unless his stand-point
-had been most peculiar, and providentially appointed, it would have
-been impossible for him to have written as he has. To speak of the
-“Arcana” as it deserves, would, to one unacquainted with it, appear like
-exaggeration, while every reader would feel that we had fallen far short
-of the truth in many points. No criticism, however reverential, can
-adequately express the innumerable and marvellous excellencies of the
-work; and should this feeble testimony to its worth excite any one to
-read and _study_ it,—and it is a work which should be studied, if read at
-all,—we know that he will say, as the Queen of Sheba said of Solomon, “It
-was a true report that I heard of thy acts and of thy wisdom. Howbeit
-I believed not the words, until I came, and mine eyes had seen it: and
-behold the half was not told me.”
-
-We have not spoken of those chapters which come between the expositions
-of Scripture, because the subjects therein treated of will recur in
-notices of his other books. They serve to diversify the work, and to
-relieve the mind tasked with the deep thought involved in the spiritual
-expositions, by the contemplation of some of the leading facts of the
-future life.
-
-The “Arcana Cœlestia” was translated into English by the late venerable
-John Clowes, a clergyman of the Established Church in Manchester, and a
-most cordial receiver and preacher of the doctrines of the New Church.
-It is published in twelve octavo volumes, with an index prepared by
-Swedenborg himself, which forms a thirteenth volume. This index has
-been greatly extended by Elihu Rich, filling two large octavos. Several
-editions of the “Arcana” have also been published in America; and the
-sale, considering the size and cost of the work, has been in both
-countries very considerable. It is a work which will in coming days
-run through many cheap editions; and when that time shall come, many
-will wonder why such a treasury of spiritual wisdom lay so long in our
-midst, and yet men thought so little of it. But the world is approaching
-Swedenborg as fast as steady progress will permit.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XI.
-
- _Anecdotes._
-
-
-Of Swedenborg’s external life, during the composition of the “Arcana
-Cœlestia,” we know little. From his “Spiritual Diary,” we incidentally
-learn that he was in Stockholm on the 23d of July, 1756. A revolution had
-been attempted, and the leaders of the conspiracy, Count Brahe and Baron
-Horn, were executed on that day. Swedenborg writes of Brahe thus:—“Brahe
-was beheaded at ten o’clock in the morning, and spoke with me at ten at
-night; that is to say, twelve hours after his execution. He was with me
-almost without interruption for several days. In two days’ time, he began
-to return to his former life, which consisted in loving worldly things;
-and after three days, he became as he was before in the world, and was
-carried into the evils that he had made his own before he died.” (S.
-Diary, 5099.)
-
-Robsahm, a friend of Swedenborg’s, probably alludes to this circumstance,
-when he writes: “One day as a criminal was led to the place of execution
-to be beheaded, I was by the side of Swedenborg, and asked him how such a
-person felt at the time of his execution. He answered: ‘When a man lays
-his head on the block, he loses all sensation. When he first comes into
-the spiritual world, and finds that he is living, he is seized with the
-fear of his expected death, tries to escape, and is very much frightened.
-At such a moment no one thinks of anything but the happiness of heaven,
-or the misery of hell. Soon the good spirits come to him, and instruct
-him where he is, and he is then left to follow his own inclinations,
-which soon lead him to the place where he remains for ever.’” It appears
-that whatever happens at the hour of death, is carried into the other
-life, and the state is continued for some time. Thus we read in the
-“Spiritual Diary” of a person who had been reduced by melancholy to
-despair, until being instigated by diabolical spirits, he destroyed
-himself, by thrusting a knife into his body. “This spirit came to me,”
-writes Swedenborg, “complaining that he was miserably treated by evil
-spirits. He was seen by me, holding a knife in his hand, as though he
-would plunge it into his breast. With this knife he labored very hard, as
-wishing rather to cast it from him, but in vain.”
-
-It soon became widely known that Swedenborg had intercourse with spirits;
-and many and various were the demands made upon him, for information of
-one kind and another. The Queen of Sweden asked him whether his spiritual
-intercourse was a science or art that could be communicated to others. He
-said: “No, it is the gift of the Lord.” “Can you then,” said she, “speak
-with every one deceased, or only with certain persons?” He answered, “I
-can not converse with all, but only with such as I have known in this
-world, with all royal and princely persons, with all renowned heroes,
-or great and learned men, whom I have known, either personally, or from
-their actions or writings; consequently with all _of whom I could form
-an idea_; for it may be supposed that a person whom I never knew, and of
-whom I could form no idea, I neither could or would wish to speak with.”
-
-The Prince of Prussia was brother to the Queen of Sweden, and shortly
-after his death, Swedenborg being at court, the Queen perceiving him
-said: “Well, Mr. Assessor, have you seen my brother?” He answered, “No.”
-Whereupon she replied: “If you should see him, remember me to him.” In
-saying this, she did but jest. Eight days afterwards, Swedenborg came
-again to court, but so early that the Queen had not left her apartment
-called the white room, where she was conversing with her maids of honor,
-and other ladies of the court. Swedenborg did not wait for the Queen’s
-coming out, but entered directly into her apartment, and whispered in
-her ear. The Queen, struck with astonishment, was taken ill, and did not
-recover for some time. After she was come to herself, she said to those
-about her: “There is only God and my brother who can know what he has
-just told me.” She owned that he had spoken of her last correspondence
-with the prince, the subject of which was known to themselves alone.
-
-The following is narrated by J. H. Jung Stilling:—“About the year 1770,
-there was a merchant in Elberfeld with whom, during seven years of my
-residence there, I lived in close intimacy. He spoke little; but what he
-said was like golden fruit on a salver of silver. He would not have dared
-for all the world to have told a falsehood. His business requiring him
-to take a journey to Amsterdam, where Swedenborg at that time resided,
-and having heard and read much of this strange individual, he formed the
-intention of visiting him. He therefore called upon him, and found a
-very venerable looking, friendly old man, who received him politely, and
-requested him to be seated. Explaining his errand, and expressing his
-deep admiration of Swedenborg’s writings, he desired that he would give
-him a proof of his intercourse with the unseen world. Swedenborg said:
-‘Why not? Most willingly.’ The merchant then proceeded to tell that he
-had formerly a friend, who studied divinity at Duisburg, where he fell
-into a consumption, of which he died. Visiting this friend a short time
-before his decease, they conversed together on an important topic. The
-question he then put to Swedenborg, was: ‘Can you learn from the student
-what was the subject of our discourse at that time?’ Swedenborg replied:
-‘We will see; what was the name of your friend?’ The merchant told his
-name, and Swedenborg then requested him to call in a few days. Some days
-after, the merchant went again to see Swedenborg, in anxious expectation.
-The old gentleman met him with a smile, and said: ‘I have spoken with
-your friend; the subject of your discourse was _the restitution of all
-things_.’ He then related to the merchant, with the greatest precision,
-what he, and what his deceased friend, had maintained. The merchant
-turned pale; for this proof was powerful and invincible. He inquired
-further: ‘How fares it with my friend? Is he in a state of blessedness?’
-Swedenborg answered: ‘No, he is not in heaven; he is still in the world
-of spirits, and torments himself continually with the idea of the
-restitution of all things.’ He ejaculated: ‘My God! What! in the other
-world?’ Swedenborg replied: ‘Certainly; a man takes with him his favorite
-inclinations and opinions, and it is very difficult to be divested of
-them. We ought, therefore, to lay them aside here.’ The merchant took his
-leave, perfectly convinced, and returned to Elberfeld.”
-
-An ambassador from Holland, named Martville, died at Stockholm. After his
-death, a considerable sum of money was demanded of his widow in payment
-of a debt. She felt certain the debt had been paid, but was unable to
-find the receipt for the money. Being advised to consult Swedenborg,
-who, she was told could converse with the dead whenever he pleased,
-she adopted the advice, more from curiosity than from a belief in his
-powers. The lady called on Swedenborg and told him her trouble; and he
-promised if he met her husband in the spiritual world, he would inquire
-of him about the matter. Eight days afterwards Martville appeared to his
-wife in a dream, and mentioned to her a private place in his cabinet,
-where she would not only find the receipt, but also a hair pin set with
-twenty brilliants which had been given up as lost. This happened about
-two o’clock in the morning. Full of joy, she arose and found them in
-the place designated. She returned again to rest, and slept till nine
-o’clock. About eleven Swedenborg was announced. His first remark, before
-Madame had time to speak, was, that he had, during the preceding night,
-seen several spirits, and among others her late husband. He had wished to
-converse with him, but Martville excused himself on the ground that he
-must go to discover to his wife something of importance. This account,
-attested by the lady herself, was noised through all Stockholm. It may be
-added that Madame desired to make Swedenborg a handsome present for his
-services, which he, of course, declined.
-
-Sometimes Swedenborg’s announcements of the states of the departed
-alarmed his auditors. We read of a case of this kind which took place on
-a voyage from Gottenburg to London. The vessel staying at Oresound, the
-Swedish Consul invited the officers of the custom house, together with
-several of the first people of the town, all anxious to see and know
-Swedenborg, to dine with him at his house. Being all seated at table, and
-none of them taking the liberty of addressing Swedenborg, who likewise
-was silent, the Consul thought it incumbent on him to break silence,
-and asked Swedenborg, as he could see and speak with the dead, whether
-he had seen Christian VI., King of Denmark, after his decease. To this
-he replied in the affirmative; adding, that when he saw him the first
-time, he was accompanied by a bishop or other prelate, who humbly begged
-the King’s pardon for the many errors into which he had led him by his
-counsels. A son of the deceased prelate happened to be present at the
-table: the Consul therefore fearing that Swedenborg might say something
-further to the disadvantage of the father, interrupted him, saying:
-“Sir, this is his son!” Swedenborg replied: “It may be, but what I am
-saying is true.”
-
-Such anecdotes might be greatly multiplied, but space forbids. No one,
-perhaps, has a lower idea of the worth of these stories, as testimonies
-to Swedenborg’s veracity, than the writer; yet they could not well be
-omitted from an account of his life. Gossip spread them far and wide in
-his own day, as is evidenced by the various forms in which they have come
-down to us; and any biographer would fail in his duty did he not show
-how the common world of men dealt with, and regarded Swedenborg. These
-anecdotes also in some degree manifest what a kind, affable, simple, and
-honest man Swedenborg was.
-
-Having finished the “Arcana Cœlestia,” Swedenborg’s pen yet knew no
-rest. In 1758 he published in London the five following works:—1. An
-Account of the Last Judgment and the Destruction of Babylon; showing
-that all the predictions in the Apocalypse are at this day fulfilled;
-being a relation of things heard and seen. 2. Concerning Heaven and its
-wonders, and concerning Hell, being a relation of things heard and seen.
-3. On the White Horse mentioned in the Apocalypse. 4. On the Planets in
-our solar system, and on those in the Heavens; with an account of their
-inhabitants, and of their spirits and angels. 5. On the New Jerusalem and
-its Heavenly Doctrines, as revealed from heaven. Let us now examine these
-works in order.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XII.
-
- _The Last Judgment._
-
-
-To the early reader of Swedenborg’s writings, few of his declarations
-appear stranger, at first, than his affirmation that the Last Judgment
-is past, that it took place in 1757. Yet although startling at first, it
-is a doctrine which, on closer acquaintance, readily comes within the
-grasp of reason and common sense; and we discover that all its early
-strangeness was owing to our having looked at it through the mist of
-prejudice and preconceived opinion.
-
-The treatise on the Last Judgment, (although, as to size, only a
-pamphlet,) is a most effective and masterly exposition of the nature
-of the end of the church, the new heavens, and the new earth of the
-Apocalypse.
-
-In the first place, it is shown that the day of the Last Judgment does
-not mean that of the destruction of the world; for neither the visible
-heaven nor the habitable earth will perish, but both will remain forever.
-The reason is that the heaven of angels is formed from the human race,
-all angels having lived the life of men, and none having been so created;
-and as the perfection of heaven increases to eternity with the increase
-of regenerate men from the world, it follows that the earth will never
-cease to exist, nor men to live and be born upon it. The world is the
-seminary of heaven. Heaven depends upon the world for its growth,
-increase, and perfection. Heaven could not exist without worlds.
-
-Heaven being formed from the human race, so likewise is Hell; all devils
-and satans having at one time been men on this or some other earth. “That
-is not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural.”
-
-These doctrines, it will be seen, militate against what are called
-orthodox opinions, which teach that angels were created before the world,
-and that no man can go to heaven or to hell before the time of the Last
-Judgment; when the souls of men having returned into their bodies, the
-visible world will be burned up; the sun and moon be quenched in nature’s
-night; and the stars, each surrounded with its own system of worlds,
-having first fallen upon this speck of a globe, are to be wiped out of
-existence. These common but crude and unscriptural ideas have afforded
-the best subjects for scoffing at the Christian religion which the
-skeptic could desire. For he triumphantly asks, How can so vast a heaven,
-and so many stars, with sun and moon, be destroyed and dissipated? And
-how can the stars fall from heaven upon the earth, when they are larger
-than the earth? How can men’s bodies, eaten up by worms, consumed by
-putrefaction, scattered to all winds, absorbed by vegetation, and again
-incorporated into other men’s systems, be re-collected for their souls?
-What is this day of Judgment? And has it not been expected for ages in
-vain? Together with many other such questions, all pertinent, but to
-which the church can give no rational answer.
-
-And yet ignorance on such subjects cannot be excused; for men might have
-known from the Word that heaven and hell are from mankind, and that man
-is raised up and lives immediately after death. Information on these
-subjects might have been obtained from the Lord’s words to the thief
-upon the cross, “Verily I say unto thee, To-day shalt thou be with me
-in Paradise;” and from those which he spoke concerning the rich man and
-Lazarus, that the one went to hell, and spoke with Abraham, and that the
-other went to heaven; and what the Lord told the Pharisees respecting the
-resurrection, that “God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.”
-And then we see how inconsistent men are with themselves on these
-subjects. A worthy church-member, who is a firm believer in the burning
-up of the world, and the resurrection of the dead at the Last Judgment,
-comes to his death-bed, and straightway all his doctrine passes into
-forgetfulness; and he talks of going home to glory in heaven, and being
-within a few hours of the angels. He dies; and his friends, as orthodox
-as himself, think of him as happy in heaven; and yet they profess to
-believe in the resurrection of his corrupt and diseased body. What
-strange inconsistency is this! But it is one of the marks of error, that
-it is always inconsistent with itself.
-
-The leading fact in Swedenborg’s doctrine of the Last Judgment, is,
-that it takes place in the spiritual world, where all men congregate
-after death. A judgment takes place in the world of spirits whenever a
-church comes to its end; that is, when its charity, and consequently its
-faith is dead, and all things that remain are mere empty forms of life.
-A judgment took place at the end of the Jewish church. For proof of
-this, we need only turn to the Gospel of _John_, (xii. 31,) where Jesus
-said: “_Now_ is the judgment of this world: _now_ shall the prince of
-this world be cast out.” We all know there was at that time no visible
-judgment in the natural world. Everything went on as before; yet, we
-learn from the Lord’s own lips, that a judgment was effected.
-
-It is a great mistake, and one which even the best of men labor under,
-to suppose that the soul of man exists alone, and independent of any
-influences but those that are external to him, and of which he is
-conscious. We would ask, Who ever saw a grain of matter independent of
-the law of gravitation,—that cause which binds it to kindred matter
-with a bond as indestructible as its own existence? It is the same with
-men’s souls. No man lives independent of spiritual association. Place
-a man in the middle of some distant and desolate island; yet he is not
-alone. Around his soul are the spirits of those who have left the world
-before him, who love as he loves, and think as he thinks. The minds of
-men and spirits are most closely and intimately conjoined; for in the
-universe of mind, as in the universe of matter, there is no such thing as
-isolation and independency. And what can be more philosophical than such
-a doctrine? The laws of matter represent the laws of spirit; in every
-particular there exists a perfect correspondence. As matter is everywhere
-bound to matter, and compacted in firm communion, so likewise are the
-minds of men to be regarded as a universe of atoms, bound together by
-loves and affections. In meditating on this subject, we must remember
-that spirit knows nothing of material space.
-
-The church had been declining from the days of the Apostles. Men had
-forsaken the pure spirit of the gospel, and had sought to hide their
-evils of life by doctrines and creeds formed from their own darkened
-understandings. The popedom had arisen; and in the black night of the
-dark ages, had established its fearful assumptions, and blasphemously
-invoked the name of the Highest to sanctify its crimes. The Reformation,
-the last flicker of an expiring candle, had indeed established free
-thought, but it failed in its highest aims; and in the erroneous doctrine
-of justification by faith alone, had deadened the consciences of men,
-and extinguished all aspirations after spiritual life. Last and worst of
-all, Atheism reared its horrid front, and openly manifested itself; yet
-what of it was open and confessed, was as nothing to what lay concealed
-even under the vestments of the church. Toward the middle of the last
-century, Christendom had reached its lowest point of degradation; and
-any one who is anxious to test this affirmation of Swedenborg’s, need
-only turn to the history and literature of that period, and observe the
-selfishness, the negation and ridicule of everything pure and spiritual,
-the gross ignorance, the licentiousness and intemperance, and in fact
-the reduction of humanity to its lowest and most bestial condition. He
-will then understand the cry of the good, at that time, in the world of
-spirits, “How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge
-our blood on them that dwell on the earth?”
-
-It is to be noted that from the time of the Lord’s advent, when he
-effected the Judgment upon the Jewish church, there had been pouring
-into the world of spirits, in countless myriads, the souls of those who
-were full of evils and falsities, and who, collecting around terrestrial
-humanity, lay as thick clouds between it and heaven. Forming themselves
-into societies by spiritual affinities, the reformed churches were in the
-middle; the Romanists around them; the Mahommedans in a still outer ring;
-and the various Gentile nations constituted a vast circumference; while
-beyond all, lay the appearance of a sea as a boundary. Of the states
-of those associations, we have a most graphic picture in Swedenborg’s
-treatise; and no where else out of the Apocalypse, do we find a more
-thorough exposure of the internal atheism of the priests of Rome, their
-blasphemies and subtlety. But the time of the end had come; the world
-groaned to be delivered; and the eyes of Swedenborg were favored to
-behold the process of the great redemption.
-
-The vast concourse of these spirits, formed into societies, is what
-is meant in the Revelation by the first heaven and the first earth
-which passed away. The manner in which these societies were dissolved,
-Swedenborg describes as follows:—“Visitation was made by angels, and
-admonition given, and the good were singled out and separated by the
-heavenly ministers, agreeable to the Lord’s words, ‘He shall send his
-angels, and they shall gather together the elect from the four winds,
-from one end of heaven to the other;’ and again, ‘All nations shall be
-gathered together before the Son of Man; and he shall separate them one
-from another, as a shepherd divideth the sheep from the goats, and he
-shall set the sheep on the right hand, and the goats on the left.’” Then
-followed destruction. There were great earthquakes, and a vehement wind,
-which swept all before it. Then gulfs yawned, and seas appeared, into
-which the wicked threw themselves, and were drawn to their place in hell.
-“Then,” says Swedenborg, “I saw angelic spirits in great numbers rising
-from below, and received into heaven. They were the sheep who had been
-kept and guarded by the Lord, and who are understood in the Word by the
-bodies of saints which arose from their sepulchres and went into the holy
-city; and by the souls of those slain for the testimony of Jesus, and who
-were watching; and by those who were of the first resurrection.
-
-“After this, there was joy in heaven, and light in the world of spirits,
-such as was not before; and the interposing clouds between heaven and
-mankind being removed, a similar light also then arose on men in the
-world, giving them new enlightenment.”
-
-Such was the Last Judgment. Its centenary draws nigh; and how fruitful
-in good to mankind has been that century which is now drawing to a
-close! It is unnecessary to repeat the hackneyed phrases which tell of
-the progress of the world during the last hundred years. Every newspaper
-speaks of it. Everybody with open eyes observes it. It has become the
-universal opinion that the world is moving onwards and upwards; yet how
-few understand _why_ the world is so moving. Men have yet to learn that
-effects can no more take place without adequate causes in the universe
-of mind than in the universe of matter. Nowhere out of Swedenborg can we
-find a description of those spiritual causes which are changing society
-and revolutionizing the whole world. We, who live in the dawn of the new
-era, can form, even in our highest states, but a faint conception of its
-coming glory. Yet we see in the wonderful movements of our age, in its
-growing benevolence, in its increasing intelligence and thoughtfulness,
-and in the prodigious advances that are making in every department of
-science and art, so many indubitable signs that the former things have
-passed away, and that the Lord is making all things new.
-
-Every one knows that in the Scripture, the second coming of the Lord
-is described as simultaneous with the Last Judgment. We will hereafter
-endeavor to prove that the Lord has indeed come, and will describe the
-manner of his coming.
-
-The reception of the doctrine of the Last Judgment is somewhat difficult,
-because the comprehension of it demands the understanding of many
-principles and spiritual laws unknown to the world at large, yet most
-worthy of any amount of labor requisite to master them. The remembrance
-of this fact will serve as an apology for any appearance of unfounded
-assumption in the outline of the doctrine we have given.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XIII.
-
- _Heaven and Hell._
-
-
-The treatise on Heaven and Hell is among the most charming of
-Swedenborg’s writings. Its subjects possess a universal attraction; for,
-what believer in the immortality of man has not, at times, longed to
-penetrate the awful mysteries of the unseen world? And there is nothing
-unreasonable in the desire. True it is, that, until Swedenborg came, any
-but the most general knowledge of the nature of the future life had been
-withdrawn from mankind since the days of primeval innocence; yet not
-from anything hurtful in the knowledge itself, but simply because the
-sublime facts of the future state transcended the apprehension of men
-immersed in worldly loves and cares, and denying and ridiculing every
-idea which was not an object of sensual perception. For this reason the
-Lord said to his disciples: “I have yet many things to say unto you,
-but ye can not bear them now.” (_John_ xvi. 12.) We frequently see this
-inability to “bear” things spiritual and divine, manifested in our own
-experience. We offer Swedenborg’s treatise, for perusal, to some man of
-science, full of self-confidence, with the laws and facts of the universe
-at his finger’s ends; or to some deeply-read theologian. The title page
-is read,—“Heaven and its Wonders, the World of Spirits, and Hell; being
-a relation of things heard and seen.” It is enough. “What nonsense! What
-foolishness! The lunatic! What could _he_ know of heaven or hell? How
-could he get there? The impostor! None but a fool could write such a
-book!” And so on. The title page settles the whole question. Now what can
-be said in reply to these railers, of whom the world is full? How can
-one argue with, and combat, such inveterate prejudice? Yet these people
-are professing Christians. They profess to believe there is a heaven and
-a hell. But, does not their condemnation of Swedenborg betray a lurking
-infidelity in their hearts? If they really possessed a living faith in
-the existence of heaven and hell, it could not appear to them so utterly
-preposterous that some account of their nature might in these times have
-been revealed, through the abounding mercy of the Lord.
-
-But the world now contains many who are willing to receive, and able to
-understand, the truths of the future life. The Lord, who never allows his
-children to lack any good thing, has, in due season, given them, through
-Swedenborg, this precious and delightful volume. Let us briefly enumerate
-its important statements.
-
-The spiritual world divides itself into three great regions,—Heaven, the
-World of Spirits, and Hell.
-
-Heaven is formed of all who have loved the Lord on earth by living a life
-in accordance with his laws. The laws of spiritual life are known, more
-or less perfectly, in all nations, even among the heathen. The lowest
-of the Gentiles have some faint rays of the light of spiritual truth;
-and if they live in obedience thereto, regeneration, and consequently,
-heaven, is attainable by them. Yet heaven has its degrees of bliss. Good
-persons of every variety of character pass into it. But the promiscuous
-association of these different kinds of character would not be orderly,
-and could not be blissful. By the law of spiritual gravitation, (from
-which the law of natural gravitation is but a derivation, and of which it
-is a type and image,) all who possess similar affections and intelligence
-are drawn together, and co-ordinated in the most blissful harmony.
-The infinite variety of heaven thus arranges itself, in general, into
-two kingdoms; specifically into three heavens; and in particular, into
-innumerable societies. The two kingdoms are respectively called celestial
-and spiritual. The angels forming the celestial kingdom are characterized
-by their exceeding love of the Lord and of goodness; and the angels who
-form the spiritual kingdom are distinguished by their exceeding love of
-their neighbor and of truth. The celestial angels are immensely wiser
-than the spiritual, and their blessedness is ineffable. Specifically
-there are three heavens, perfectly distinct, called the first heaven,
-the second or middle heaven, and the third or highest heaven; or they
-may be called external, internal, and inmost; or natural, spiritual, and
-celestial. Of these three heavens the highest or third, together with
-the internal of the first or lowest heaven, forms the celestial kingdom;
-and the middle or second, together with the external of the first or
-lowest heaven, forms the spiritual kingdom. These three heavens and
-two kingdoms, arising out of the varieties of the human mind, are not
-arbitrary distinctions. The external, first, or natural heaven, is formed
-of those who, from a principle of obedience and duty, live in accordance
-with the Divine will. The second, spiritual, or middle heaven, is formed
-of such as love truth, delight in things intellectual, and at the same
-time are in disinterested love to the neighbor. The inmost, third, or
-celestial heaven, is formed of those who, full of love to the Lord, are
-in innocence. These celestial angels, gifted with the highest wisdom
-and peace, yet full of humility, indefinitely exceed all beneath them
-in beauty and wisdom. The existence and order of the three heavens was
-represented by the courts of the Jewish temple. The celebrated Oberlin,
-a diligent reader of Swedenborg, had a plan of the courts of the temple
-hung upon the walls of his church, by which he taught his hearers, that,
-according to their humility, piety, fidelity, and love of being useful
-to each other, would be their elevation in the Lord’s kingdom, either
-to the first, second, or third heaven. We think that no one, in whom
-reign the heavenly principles of “love” to the Lord and the neighbor;
-“joy” in duty under all circumstances; “peace” in every change of state;
-“long-suffering” under all provocations; “gentleness” of behaviour;
-“goodness” of disposition, ever manifesting itself in good actions;
-“faith” or truth, believed, loved, and thence trusted in; “meekness”
-in doing and in suffering; “temperance” both in external and internal
-delights, Gal. v. 22, would be an unwilling inhabitant of such a heaven
-as Swedenborg describes. Is not this at least presumptive evidence that
-he has spoken truly?
-
-The three heavens are further subdivided into innumerable societies,
-some smaller, and some larger; some consisting of myriads of angels,
-and some of hundreds. Their association into societies, is a result of
-similarity of character, which similarity is imaged in their faces; and a
-general likeness of countenance is observed among the angels who form one
-society. All who are in similar love know each other, just as men in the
-world know their kindred, relations, and friends; and thus, as it were,
-spontaneously associated, they feel at home and in freedom, and thence
-in the full delight of their life. From this it also follows that angels
-who differ much are far apart; and few depart out of their own society
-into another, because to go out from their own society is like going out
-of themselves, or out of their own life, and passing into another which
-is not so agreeable. Nevertheless all the societies of heaven are bound
-together in one perfect form, which is strictly human.
-
-All angels are in the human form, and are just such men and women as they
-were on earth, except that they have rejected the material body. That
-we should have to write and enforce such truisms—for such they must
-appear to a mind really rational,—is owing to the strange and ridiculous
-fancies that are commonly entertained on this subject. We often hear the
-departed talked of as shades, and thought of as minds without forms, or
-mere thinking principles composed of some sort of ethereal vapor; and
-when artists draw them, we see perhaps an exquisitely beautiful human
-form, but disfigured with large feathery wings, which, having no adequate
-muscles, would have no power of motion. None of these vague, shadowy,
-and erroneous ideas do we find in the Bible. The angels seen by Abraham,
-Lot, Manoah, the prophets, and the Lord’s disciples, were all seen as
-men, and talked with as men. Our author writes thus explicitly on this
-subject. “The angelic form is in every respect human; angels have faces,
-eyes, ears, breasts, arms, hands, and feet; they see, hear, and converse
-with each other; and, in a word, no external attribute of man is wanting,
-except the natural body.”
-
-And now comes a doctrine which on a first view may appear very mystical,
-and yet when pondered over, and understood, commends itself to our belief
-by a thousand irresistible evidences drawn from analogy, and confirmed
-by right reason. It is, that every society of heaven is in the human
-form; and that the universal heaven, viewed collectively, is also in the
-human form; and is called by Swedenborg the Grand or Greatest [Maximus]
-Man. Wilkinson well expresses this sublime truth. “Heaven,” he says, “is
-supremely human—nay more, it is one man. As the members of the body make
-one person, so before God, all good men make one humanity: every society
-of the angels is a heavenly man in a lesser form, and every angel in a
-least. The reason is, that God himself, (the Lord Jesus Christ,) is a
-Divine Man, and He shapes His heaven into His own image and likeness,
-even as He made Adam. The oneness of heaven comes from God’s unity:
-its manhood from His humanity. Heaven has, therefore, all the members,
-organs, and viscera of a man; its angel inhabitants, every one, are in
-some province of the Grand Man. Indefinite myriads of us go to a fibre
-of its humanity. Some are in the province of the brain; some in that
-of the lungs; some in that of the heart; some in that of the belly;
-some are in the legs and arms; and all, wherever humanized, that is to
-say, located in humanity, perform spiritually the offices of that part
-of the body whereto they correspond. They all work together, however
-spaced apparently, just as the parts of a single man. Their space is but
-their palpable liberty, and they touch the human atoms, more closely,
-by offices which unite them in God, than the contiguous fibres of our
-flesh.” Every society of heaven also increases in number daily, and as it
-increases, it becomes more perfect; and from its perfection the universal
-heaven becomes more perfect, because heaven is composed of societies.
-Since increasing numbers make heaven more perfect, it is evident how
-much _they_ are deceived who believe that heaven will be closed when
-it becomes full. On the contrary, heaven will never be closed, for the
-greater its fullness, the greater its perfection; and therefore the
-angels desire nothing more earnestly than to receive new comers.
-
-This part of our subject would require considerable expansion to make it
-intelligible to minds that have never meditated on these high themes, and
-whose theological education has perverted all perception of the truth on
-these matters. The subject is enticing, but our limits command restraint.
-
-It was a remark of a profane wit and epicure that “as to heaven, he had
-no great longing, as he could not see what great pleasure there could
-be in sitting on a cloud and singing psalms to eternity.” We have in
-this expression a thought which we know to be common to many minds, but
-respect for the externals of religion forbids its expression. The general
-belief respecting the nature of life in heaven, is so vague, and contains
-so much of clouds and psalm-singing, that it is not to be wondered at
-that some free and daring spirits should openly avow their preference for
-the more substantial realities of this life. And is it not a pity that
-the divine glories and delights of the heavenly life should become so
-veiled in mystery as to lose their attraction, and cease to be desirable?
-With the exception of the church’s ignorance of the humanity, unity, and
-divinity of its Saviour and Lord, no surer evidence could be adduced
-of its consummation, than its inability to answer the simplest child’s
-questions as to the nature of life in heaven. Let us be thankful that
-man’s utmost wants, in this respect, are satisfied in the writings of
-that New Church which the Lord is now raising up, and of which Swedenborg
-was the divinely-appointed herald.
-
-The sun of heaven is the Lord. The light of heaven is the divine truth,
-and its heat the divine love; both proceeding from the Lord as a sun. The
-sun of this world is not seen in heaven. Nature commences from the sun
-of this world, and everything which is produced from it, and subsists by
-it, is called natural; but the spiritual world in which heaven is, is
-above nature, and entirely distinct from it, although it is ever to be
-remembered that nature is a derivation from spirit, and communicates with
-spirit by correspondences. We shall have more to say on this conjunction
-yet perfect separation, between nature and spirit, when we come to speak
-of the doctrine of degrees.
-
-The sun of heaven, or the divine sphere of glory surrounding the Lord,
-the “light which no man can approach unto,” 1 Tim. vi. 6, appears
-variously to the angels of heaven according to their states of love and
-intelligence. To the angels of the third heaven, the sun appears fiery
-and flaming; to the angels of the second heaven, white and brilliant;
-while to those of the first heaven its light is more subdued and veiled
-with clouds, yet at intervals bursting forth and pouring his glorious
-radiance upon them. Although the Lord is thus seen by the angels as a sun
-above them, yet at times He appears in their midst, in an angelic form,
-and with a resplendent countenance. What tongue can describe the rapt
-adoration and ineffable joy which must thrill angelic bosoms on these
-occasions!
-
-Heaven has its times and its seasons, but they are not like those of
-earth. In heaven there is no winter and no night. The times and seasons
-of heaven are consequences of the variations of the states of angelic
-minds. While to all appearance they are objective as on earth, they are
-in reality strictly subjective. The external changes of light and heat
-correspond to the internal changes of love and wisdom in the angelic
-mind. Now as the angels are sometimes in a state of intense love, and
-sometimes in a state of love not so intense, morning, noon, evening,
-and twilight, exist in heaven as the external emblems of these changes.
-Without such changes life would lose its zest. Eternal uniformity would
-be eternal dullness.
-
-Since angels are men, and live together in society like men on earth,
-therefore they have garments, houses, and other things similar to those
-which exist on earth, but of course infinitely more beautiful and
-perfect. The garments of the angels correspond to their intelligence.
-The garments of some glitter as with flame, and those of others are
-resplendent as with light; others are of various colors, and some white
-and opaque. The angels of the inmost heaven are naked because they are in
-innocence, and nakedness corresponds to innocence. It is because garments
-represent states of wisdom that they are so much spoken of in the Word,
-in relation to the church and good men. Thus in Isaiah liii. 1, “Awake,
-put on strength, O Zion; put on thy _beautiful garments_, O Jerusalem.”
-And in Ezekiel xv. 10, the Lord says of his church: “I girded thee about
-with fine linen, and covered thee with silk.” And in the Apocalypse iii.
-4, 5, it is said: “They who have not defiled their _garments_, shall walk
-with Me in _white_, for they are worthy. He that overcometh, the same
-shall be clothed in _white raiment_.” What a depth of meaning appears in
-these passages when we remember the spiritual signification of garments!
-
-“The garments of the angels,” writes Swedenborg, “do not merely appear to
-be garments, but they really are garments; for they not only see them,
-but feel them, and have different ones, which they take off and put on,
-laying aside those which are not in use, and resuming them when they come
-into use again. That they are clothed with a variety of garments, I have
-witnessed a thousand times; and when I inquired whence they obtained
-them, they told me ‘from the Lord,’ and that they receive them as gifts,
-and that they are sometimes clothed without knowing how. They also said
-that their garments are changed according to the changes of their state.”
-
-Since there are societies in heaven, and the angels live as men, it
-follows that they have habitations, various, like all else in heaven,
-according to the degree of love and wisdom in which they are principled.
-No words are like Swedenborg’s own on this subject. “Whenever I have
-conversed with the angels mouth to mouth, I have been present with
-them in their habitations, which are exactly like the habitations on
-earth called houses, but more beautiful. They contain chambers, parlors
-[conclavia], and bed-chambers, in great numbers; courts also, and around
-them gardens, shrubberies, and fields. Where the angels are consociated
-their habitations are contiguous, or near to each other, and arranged in
-the form of a city, with streets, ways, and squares, exactly like the
-cities on our earth.
-
-“I have seen palaces in heaven, magnificent beyond description. Their
-upper parts were refulgent as if they were pure gold, and their lower
-parts as if they were precious stones: some were more splendid than
-others, and the splendor without was equaled by the magnificence within.
-The apartments were ornamented with decorations which neither language
-nor science can adequately describe. On the south were paradises, in
-which all things were similarly resplendent; for in some places the
-leaves of the trees were like silver, and the fruits like gold, while
-the colors of the flowers which were arranged in beds, appeared like
-rainbows; at the boundaries appeared other palaces, which terminated the
-view. Such is the architecture of heaven that one might say it is the
-very art itself; nor is this to be wondered at, because the art itself
-is from heaven. The angels said that such things, and innumerable others
-still more perfect, are presented before their eyes by the Lord, but that
-nevertheless they delight their minds more than their eyes, because in
-everything they see correspondences of things divine.
-
-“The angels who constitute the Lord’s celestial kingdom, dwell for the
-most part in elevated places, or mountains; those who form the spiritual
-kingdom, on hills; but those who are in the lowest parts of heaven, in
-places which appear as rocks. There are also angels who do not live
-consociated, but separate. These dwell in the midst of heaven, and are
-the best of the angels.
-
-“The houses in which the angels dwell, are not constructed by hand, like
-houses in the world, but are given them freely by the Lord, according to
-their reception of good and truth. All things whatsoever which the angels
-possess, they hold as gifts from the Lord; and they are supplied with
-everything they need.”
-
-We thus learn that in heaven there are not external, physical, or mental
-occupations to support bodily wants, as in this world.
-
-It was said above that the angels have not wings, as is commonly
-supposed. Their power of progression far exceeds anything that wings
-could supply. They have no idea of space, such as we have in the world.
-All who are of like disposition spontaneously associate together in the
-spiritual world. It thus follows that those are near each other who are
-in a similar state, and distant who are in a dissimilar state; and that
-what appears to be space in heaven is merely an external appearance,
-representative of internal differences of mind. From this cause alone the
-heavens are distinct from each other, and each society of heaven, and
-every individual in each society. Hence also the hells are altogether
-separated from the heavens.
-
-From the same cause, any one in the spiritual world appears to be
-present if another intensely desires his presence; for from that desire
-he sees him in thought, and puts himself in his state. Again one person
-is removed from another in proportion as he holds him in aversion; for
-all aversion is from contrariety of the affections and disagreement of
-the thoughts; therefore many who appear together in one place in the
-spiritual world, so long as they agree, separate as soon as they disagree.
-
-Further: when any one goes from one place to another, whether it be in
-his own city, in the courts, or the gardens, or to others out of his own
-city, he arrives sooner when he has a strong desire to be there, and
-later when his desire is less strong; the way itself being lengthened or
-shortened according to his desire of arrival. Hence again it is evident
-that distances, and consequently spaces, exist with the angels altogether
-according to the state of their minds.
-
-These principles settle that often asked question, “Shall we know each
-other in the future life?” We shall, if we are in the same state as
-to love and truth; but if in different states, we shall not, but shall
-be separate; and, moreover, we shall have no desire for acquaintance.
-The only friendships in heaven are those formed on the ground of
-similarity of character. If this similarity does not exist,—with the
-exception perhaps of a short meeting in the world of spirits—death is an
-everlasting, though in such case not a mournful, farewell.
-
-There are governments in heaven, various according to the varied classes
-of mind which compose the heavenly societies. The government of mutual
-love is the only government which exists in heaven. Governors in heaven
-are distinguished by love and wisdom more than others, and by willing
-well to all from love; and knowing, from their superior wisdom, how
-to realize the good they purpose. They do not domineer, and command
-imperiously, but minister and serve: not making themselves greater than
-others, but less; for they put their own good last, and the good of their
-society first: nevertheless they enjoy honor and glory; for they dwell
-in the midst of their society, in a more elevated situation than others,
-and inhabit magnificent palaces; but they accept glory and honor, not for
-the sake of themselves, but for the sake of obedience; for all in heaven
-know that they enjoy honor and glory from the Lord, and that, therefore
-they ought to be obeyed. These are the things which are meant by the
-Lord’s words to his disciples: “Whosoever will be chief among you, let
-him be your servant; even as the Son of Man came not to be ministered
-unto, but to minister.” Matthew xx. 27, 28. “He that is greatest among
-you, let him be as the younger: and he that is chief, as he that doth
-serve.” Luke xxii. 26. A similar government prevails also in every house
-in heaven; for in every house there is a master, and there are servants,
-the master loving the servants, and the servants loving the master, so
-that they serve each other from love. The master teaches the servants how
-they ought to live, and directs what they ought to do, while the servants
-obey, and perform their duties.
-
-Divine worship performed in heaven, is much the same in externals, as
-on earth. In the heavens, as on earth, there are doctrines, preachings,
-and temples. As the angels have houses and palaces, so also they have
-temples in which preaching is performed. Such things exist in heaven
-because the angels are continually perfecting in wisdom and love. But
-real divine worship in the heavens does not consist, any more than on
-earth, in frequenting temples, and hearing sermons, but in a life of love
-and usefulness; sermons and prayers being only means whereby the mind is
-enlightened to perform its various duties. “To work is to pray,” is a
-heavenly precept which we should all do well to engrave upon our hearts.
-
-The sermons of heaven are fraught with such wisdom that nothing of the
-kind in the world can be compared with them. They are all drawn from the
-Word. The same Bible that we read here, the angels read in heaven; but to
-them it is a very different book from what it is to us. Where we read and
-think of earthly and material things, they read and think of spiritual
-and divine things. To them its spiritual and celestial senses are as open
-as the natural sense is to us. From the Word they derive their highest
-wisdom; and through continual converse with it, they grow wiser and wiser
-day by day. The Word is the wisdom of the Lord, and eternity can not
-exhaust it.
-
-All infants go to heaven, whether born within the church or out of it;
-whether of pious parents or wicked ones. When infants die, they are still
-infants in the other life. They are not angels, but become angels. Every
-one, on his decease, is in a similar state of life to that in which he
-was in the world; an infant in the state of infancy, a boy in a state
-of boyhood, and a youth, a man, or an old man, in the state of youth, of
-manhood, or of age; but the state of every one is afterwards changed. As
-soon as infants are raised from the dead, which takes place immediately
-after decease, they are carried up into heaven, and delivered to the care
-of angels of the female sex, who in the life of the body loved infants
-tenderly, and at the same time loved God. By these good angels, they
-are educated and brought up until they attain a suitable age, when they
-are transferred to other teachers. They grow up and become young men
-and women; are instructed in wisdom, and trained in the duties of the
-heavenly life: and when their character is fully developed, they become
-settled in some society, either of the celestial or spiritual kingdom, in
-agreement with their inherited genius or disposition. What a delightful
-faith is this! Do not its beauty and rationality prove its truthfulness?
-
-Many persons imagine that infants are forever infants in heaven, and that
-there is indeed something infantile about all angels. This idea probably
-arises from the pictures which are frequently seen, in which angels
-are drawn as infants. But this is a great mistake. Children in heaven
-grow up into young men and women, and the aged return to the freshness
-of early manhood. They who are in heaven are continually advancing to
-the spring-time of life, and the more thousands of years they live, the
-more delightful and happy is the spring to which they attain; and this
-progression goes on to eternity. Good women who have died old and worn
-out with age, after a succession of years come more and more into the
-flower of youth, and into a beauty which exceeds all the conceptions of
-beauty which can be formed from what the eye has seen. In a word, _to
-grow old in heaven is to grow young_. It is worthy of note, that the
-human form of every man after death, is beautiful in proportion as his
-love and practice of divine truths is interior. The angels of the inmost
-heaven are consequently the most beautiful, because their love of truth
-is the deepest, and their lives are the most perfect. “I have seen,”
-says Swedenborg, “the faces of angels of the third heaven, which were so
-beautiful, that no painter, with the utmost power of art, could depict
-even a thousandth part of their light and life; but the faces of the
-angels of the lowest heaven may, in some measure, be adequately depicted.”
-
-It is believed by many in the world that heaven is a place of idleness,
-full of refined sensual delights, of pleasant sights and harmonious
-sounds; in short, some such place as a laborious tradesman, struggling
-for a fortune, fancies he shall enjoy when his gains shall have enabled
-him to “_retire_.” But this is a great mistake. Man’s nature remains
-the same in heaven as on earth; and who has not felt that his happiest
-moments are not those of mere pleasure and idleness, but those in which
-he was rendering himself most eminently useful? Happiness is as little
-consonant with idleness in heaven as on earth. Jesus himself said:
-“My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.” John v. 17. The angels are
-employed. All the delights of heaven are conjoined with uses, and are
-inherent in them. In proportion to an angel’s usefulness, is his bliss.
-Some spirits, we read, conceived the opinion that heavenly happiness
-consisted in a life of ease, and in being served by others; but they were
-told that happiness by no means consists in mere rest from employment,
-because every one would then desire to take away the happiness of others
-to promote his own; and since all would have the same desire, none would
-be happy; that such a life would not be active but indolent, and that
-indolence makes life torpid; and that without activity there can be no
-happiness, and that _cessation from employment is only for the sake of
-recreation_, that a man _may return_, with new vigor, to the _activity_
-of his life. They who entertained the idea that heavenly joy consists in
-a life of indolence, and sucking in eternal delight without employment,
-were allowed some experience of such a life; and they perceived that it
-is most sorrowful, and that all joy being destroyed, they would after a
-time loathe and nauseate it.
-
-Some spirits who believed that heavenly joy consists solely in praising
-and celebrating God, were instructed that to praise and celebrate God
-is not properly an active life; and that God has no need of praise and
-celebration. The Lord’s will is that all should perform uses; and the
-angels testify that in the performance of good works is the highest
-freedom, conjoined with ineffable delights.
-
-From all this it follows that heaven is full of employments, in
-comparison with which those of the world are few. There are societies
-whose occupation consists in taking care of infants; other societies,
-whose employment is to instruct and educate them as they grow up; others
-which in like manner instruct and educate the young; others which
-instruct the simply good from the Christian world, and lead them in the
-ways of heaven; others which perform the same office to Gentile nations;
-others which defend novitiate spirits, or those who are newly arrived
-from the world, from the infestations of evil spirits; some also are
-attendant on those who are preparing in the world of spirits for heaven;
-and some are present with those who are in hell, to restrain them from
-tormenting each other beyond limit: there are also others who attend
-those who are being raised from the dead. In general, angels of every
-society are sent to men, that they may guard them, and withdraw them
-from evil affections and consequent evil thoughts, and inspire them with
-good affections, so far as they are willing to receive them. All these
-employments are performed by the Lord through their instrumentality;
-and hence it is that by _angels_ in the Word, in its internal sense, are
-not meant _angels_, but something of the Lord; and for the same reason,
-_angels_ in the Word are called _gods_.
-
-These employments of the angels are their general employments, but every
-one has his own particular duty; for every general use is composed
-of innumerable others, which are called mediate, ministering, and
-subservient uses. But in heaven there are so many offices that it is
-impossible to enumerate them on account of their multitude. All angels
-feel delight in their employment derived from the love of use, and none
-from the love of self or of gain; nor is any one influenced by the love
-of gain for the sake of his maintenance, because all the necessaries of
-life are freely given them; their habitations, their clothes, their food.
-
-It is De Quincey, we think, who accuses Swedenborg of sensualizing
-heaven, and reducing its sublime glories to the common order of things
-in this world. The assertion could only have been made through want of
-personal acquaintance with the writings of Swedenborg. No one can use
-the words, Isaiah lxiv. 4, quoted by the Apostle, 1 Cor. ii. 9: “Eye
-hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of
-man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him,” with
-more fervor and truth than the New Church preacher. Everywhere we are
-told by Swedenborg, that the joys and delights of heaven transcend the
-highest power of language to express; everywhere we are told that our
-highest ideas formed from natural things, fall indefinitely short of the
-common realities of the heavenly life. Yet we also learn that the common
-humanities and pleasures of this life are not lost in the next; and that
-as men and women we carry with us to our eternal home every faculty
-of thought and affection which we possess here. In this most rational
-doctrine there is gain every way. In thinking of heaven we know we can
-never overrate its bliss, think as we will; and yet with this idea is
-associated nothing of dreamy vagueness. We feel that as we live well we
-are but walking onwards to a pleasant home, in which all that is truest
-and best in this life will go with us. What stronger incentive can a man
-have to a pure and religious life than this divine faith. Entertaining
-it, with what feeling may he, at the close of life, utter the poet’s
-words,—
-
- “Draw near, sweet death;
- Come raise me into life!”
-
-The condition of admission into heaven is the possession of a soul
-whose existence is a continual fulfillment of those two commandments
-on which the Lord says, “hang all the law and the prophets”—love to
-God, and love to man. To enter heaven, we must habitually place self
-last, and our neighbor first; and unless we can do this, we can never
-know eternal bliss. Now we are born into this world selfish; and hence
-it is truly said we are hereditarily depraved. It is the Divine will
-to take all to heaven. To do this, it is necessary that we should be
-divested of our corrupt hereditary nature; as the Lord said to Nicodemus:
-“Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot
-see the kingdom of God.” This regeneration of mind, this change from a
-supreme love of self, to a supreme love of God and our neighbor, is, of
-necessity, a gradual work. It is not accomplished in a day, nor in a
-month, nor in a year. Like all Divine works, it proceeds gradually, step
-by step; “first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn in the
-ear.” The regeneration of man is a Divine work, and as the Divine end in
-the creation of man was the formation of heaven out of the human race,
-the Lord’s providence is unceasingly exerted to draw man out of evil,
-by all means consonant with the maintenance of the inalienable freedom
-of his will. It thus follows that the Lord, in all his dealings with
-man, has respect solely to his eternal state, and amid all the apparent
-accidents and vicissitudes of life, he is present, bending them and
-making them all conduce to man’s everlasting peace. Life in this world,
-its cares, trials, pleasures, comforts, friendships, sympathies, and
-affections, form the divinely-appointed regenerative process; and those
-who will only believe this great truth, and submit to the Divine leading,
-will encounter nothing in life but what is good for them; and existence
-here, however bitter and painful at times, will resolve itself into a
-series of lessons devised by infinite wisdom to uproot all latent and
-known evils, transforming the patient sufferer into a true child of God.
-The Lord permits one man to be rich, powerful, and famous, and another
-to be afflicted with disease and perplexed with poverty; one to have a
-settled and calm peace of mind, while another is tried and tormented
-with doubts and anxieties; nor for any ultimate purpose on earth, but
-solely as a means of spiritual regeneration,—as a means of making man
-happy in the eternal life to come. All man’s states are under the minute
-guardianship of the Lord; and each day comes round with its circle of
-pleasant and unpleasant occurrences, often, apparently, the result of
-accident and chance, but in truth all provided of the Divine Providence
-for the eradication of evil, and the growth and nurture of goodness.
-There is no trial encountered, no circumstance met, or cross endured, but
-has its eternal issue; and man’s conduct in relation to it is looked upon
-by the Lord with a love and interest infinitely transcending our highest
-conception. All has been foreseen; and these daily recurring tasks are
-appointed by that wisdom which guides the stars in their courses, and
-by that love which requires eternity to satisfy the ardor with which it
-would bless. With what dignity does such a faith clothe existence! What
-earnestness and celestial patience must it infuse into life!
-
-From all that has now been said, it will be very evident that heaven
-is not a gift of immediate Divine mercy, to be obtained by a verbal
-confession of faith at the hour of death. If man could be saved by
-immediate mercy, all would be saved; even the inhabitants of hell,
-and hell itself would not exist; because the Lord is Mercy itself,
-Love itself, and Good itself, and wills the salvation of all, and the
-damnation of no one. But man’s spirit is substantial; and if formed to
-evil, to change it would be equivalent to annihilation. “The angels
-declare that it were easier to change a bat into a dove, or an owl into
-a bird of paradise, than to change an infernal spirit into an angel of
-heaven.” “Ample experience,” writes Swedenborg, “enables me to testify
-that it is impossible to implant the life of heaven in those who have
-led an opposite life in the world. There were some who believed that
-they should easily receive divine truths after death, when they heard
-them from the angels; and that they would believe them then, amend their
-lives, and be received into heaven; and the experiment was made on great
-numbers of them, in order that they might be convinced that repentance
-is not possible after death. Some understood the truths they heard, and
-seemed to receive them; but as soon as they returned to the life of their
-love, they rejected them, and even argued against them. Some rejected
-them instantly, from entire unwillingness to hear them; but others were
-desirous that _the life of the love they had contracted in the world,
-might be taken away from them; and that angelic life, the life of heaven,
-might be infused in its place_. This was permitted; but when the life of
-their love was taken away, they lay as if dead, and deprived of all their
-faculties. From this it was manifest that no one’s life can possibly be
-changed after death, that evil life can not be changed into good life,
-nor the life of an infernal into that of an angel; because every spirit
-is from head to foot of the same quality as his love, and therefore of
-the same quality as his life; and consequently to transmute his life into
-its opposite is to destroy him altogether.” All this goes to confirm the
-Lord’s declaration before quoted, “Except a man be born again, he can not
-see the kingdom of God.” On no other terms can heavenly bliss be gained.
-
-We now come to speak of the World of Spirits, which Swedenborg thus
-defines: “The world of spirits is neither heaven nor hell, but an
-intermediate place or state between both, into which man enters
-immediately after death; and then after a certain period, the duration of
-which is determined by the quality of his life in the world, he is either
-elevated into heaven, or cast into hell.
-
-“The spirits in the world of spirits are immensely numerous, because
-that world is the general assembly of all immediately after their
-resurrection, and all are examined there and prepared for their final
-abode; but the length of their sojourn in that world is not in all cases
-the same. Some only enter it, and are immediately taken up into heaven,
-or cast down into hell; some remain there a few weeks, and others several
-years, but none (since the Last Judgment,) more than thirty years.”
-
-A belief in the existence of an intermediate state has been entertained
-in all times and churches, except among Protestants, who, in their
-anxiety to divest themselves of every remnant of Popery, rejected the
-doctrine entirely, through aversion to the follies of Purgatory. A
-return to the truth is however slowly taking place; not a few Protestant
-divines having expressed their faith in the existence of Hades, or the
-intermediate state alluded to in the literal sense of Scripture. But the
-world of spirits is not to be thought of as a revived idea of Purgatory.
-The soul of no man is changed in the world of spirits. “As the tree falls
-so it lies.” The discipline of this life is perfected at death, and its
-opportunities never return. The world of spirits is a place where the
-externals of man are brought into correspondence with his internals; for
-no one, either in heaven or in hell, is allowed to have a divided mind,
-understanding one thing and willing another. What any one wills, he must
-understand, and what he understands he must will; therefore he who wills
-good in heaven, must understand truth; and he who wills evil in hell,
-must understand falsities. On this account also, falses are removed from
-the good in the world of spirits, and there are given them truths which
-agree and harmonize with their good; but truths are removed from the
-evil, and they take to themselves falses which agree and harmonize with
-their evil. Let us explain this subject further.
-
-We suppose the generality of our readers will admit that countless
-thousands of good men and women among the Mahommedans, Chinese, Hindoos,
-and all the heathen nations, who live according to the measure of their
-light, are saved and taken to heaven. But it is very evident that they
-can not go to heaven carrying with them false notions on religious
-subjects, and knowing nothing of that good Lord into whose kingdom they
-are about to pass. They must be instructed. They must have errors removed
-from their minds, and truths implanted in their stead. Time is required
-to effect these changes, and the world of spirits is the school in which
-the process is accomplished. Instruction in truth is readily received by
-the simply good; and after being enlightened and purified from falsity,
-they are led to their eternal homes among the blessed—to those of a
-disposition and order of mind like themselves.
-
-Then, again, among Christians, there are many who die with slight
-failings pertaining to them, with infirmities of temper, with bad habits
-of one kind and another; yet who are really sound-hearted and good men.
-Their lot can not be hell; yet with these flaws in their character, their
-presence in heaven could not be pleasant, because their state of mind
-is at variance with the perfect order and peace of heaven. Such, then,
-remain in the world of spirits, passing through trials, and temptations,
-and sufferings, until they reject all that is disorderly and impure. The
-processes by which this removal of external evils is accomplished, are
-frequently extremely painful, and extend over many years. Their removal
-might with less difficulty have been accomplished in the present life.
-The Lord warns us of this in these words: “Agree with thine adversary
-quickly, while thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the
-adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the
-officer, and thou be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt
-by no means come out thence till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.”
-Matthew v. 25, 26. Our adversary is the truth. Truth is ever an adversary
-to the evil. Elijah the prophet represented the Divine Truth. When he
-approached the wicked Ahab, Ahab cried: “Hast thou found me, O mine
-enemy?” “In the way with him” is in the present life; and the “prison”
-is the world of spirits, often so called in the Word, out of which we
-shall not be delivered until entirely divested of selfish affections,
-and false principles of thought. How practical, thus viewed, becomes our
-Lord’s advice! But without a knowledge of the world of spirits, and the
-spiritual sense of Scripture, it is quite mystical and unintelligible.
-
-There are many in the Christian world who have confirmed their minds in
-false ideas on many religious doctrines. With such erroneous ideas they
-can not enter heaven, where truth alone prevails. They therefore remain
-in the world of spirits until, through instruction, they see and reject
-the false persuasions they had contracted on earth. In some cases, where
-false doctrine has been deeply reasoned upon, and ground, as it were,
-into the mind, the process of its removal and rejection is attended with
-deep and prolonged suffering.
-
-As the good reject all false ideas in the world of spirits, so the evil
-cast off all true ones. It may be asked, Why? Why should bad be made
-worse? Bad is not made worse. It is for the peace of the evil themselves
-that they should be divested of all truth. The presence of truth with
-the wicked only adds to their torment by the continual protest it makes
-against their sin. It is also well that the evil lose all truth, for the
-sake of the good, whom they might trouble and disturb through the power
-that truth would afford them to assume an angelic appearance; to become
-wolves in sheep’s clothing; or as Paul states it, “Satan transforming
-himself into an angel of light.” Hypocrites, who have used truth to
-subserve their own selfish ends, remain longer than others in the world
-of spirits, and endure much suffering ere they allow their means of
-subtlety and mischief to depart from them. The process of divesting the
-evil of the truths they possess, is described by the Lord in these words:
-“Take heed, therefore, how ye hear: for whosoever hath, to him shall be
-given; and whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he
-seemeth to have.” Luke viii. 18. What is heard is truth. The good alone
-have truth, for their goodness loves truth, and cherishes it. Truth thus
-loved, multiplies; therefore it is said, “more shall be given.” The bad
-may have truth in their memory, may use it for selfish purposes, and talk
-much about it; nevertheless it is not theirs. Their internal evil hates
-it. “Every one that doeth evil hateth the light;” and in the future life
-the truth which he seemed to have, is taken from him. How just, and at
-the same time how merciful, is this judgment!
-
-Hell is the congregation of all evil spirits. As there are many heavens,
-so likewise there are many hells. As the inhabitants of heaven are
-arranged from similarity of goodness and truth, so the inhabitants of
-hell are arranged from similarity of evil and falsity. The hells are
-arranged so distinctly according to the differences of evil, that nothing
-more orderly and distinct can be conceived. The Lord, speaking through
-David, says: Psalm lxxxvi. 13: “Thou hast delivered my soul from the
-_lowest hell_.” Thus from Scripture we derive a direct proof, if proof
-were wanted, of the gradations of evil. There are several other texts to
-the same effect.
-
-The scenery of hell, like that of heaven, is in perfect correspondence
-with the states of those there. It is an outbirth from the minds of its
-inhabitants; and as _they_ are deformed and full of every pollution, so
-their scenery is full of horrors and things abominable. “In hell there is
-no sun, but the inhabitants roam in darkness corresponding to themselves,
-for they are darkness: their light is artificial, as of coal fires,
-meteors, ignes fatui, and the lights of night. They inhabit scenery of
-which they are the souls, as bogs, fens, tangled forests, caverns, dreary
-deserts, charred and ruined cities. In the milder hells, there appear, as
-it were, rude cottages, which are in some cases contiguous, and resemble
-the streets and lanes of a city. Within the houses infernal spirits
-are engaged in continual quarrels, enmities, blows, and violences,
-while the streets and lanes are full of robberies and depredations. The
-inhabitants are at continual war, hating and tormenting one another,
-and the cruelties they practice are indescribable.” “It is impossible
-to give a description of the horrible forms of the spirits of hell. No
-two are alike, although there is a general likeness in those who are in
-the same evil. They are forms of contempt of others, of menace against
-those who do not pay them respect, of hatreds of various kinds, and of
-revenge; and in these forms, outrage and cruelty are transparent from
-within; but when others commend, venerate, and worship them, their faces
-are drawn up, and have an appearance of gladness arising from delight.
-Some of their faces are direful and void of life, like corpses; some are
-black, and others fiery, like torches; others are disfigured by pimples,
-warts, and ulcers; and frequently no face appears, but instead of a face
-something hairy and bony, and sometimes nothing but teeth. Their bodies
-are monstrous, and their speech is the speech of anger, of hatred, of
-revenge; for every one speaks from his own false, and the tone of his
-voice is from his own evil. In a word they are all images of their own
-hell.”
-
-“And does Swedenborg relate such horrors?” some may ask. For facts,
-we answer, Swedenborg is not to blame. Like the Israelites of old, we
-would fain have our prophets “speak unto us smooth things.” Let us rid
-ourselves of all morbid delicacy, and seek to know the truth. We should
-all do well to peruse with patience those pages wherein our author
-narrates the horrors of hell, so that we may see, shun, and detest the
-evils which make hell. It is well that every man should know whither his
-lust, his pride, his avarice, or anger, is leading him. If he shudder, it
-is for his eternal good.
-
-The universal hell, like heaven, is as one man,—not of beauty, as heaven,
-but a hideous monster. In its collective capacity, it is the Devil and
-Satan; the Devil is the name of its evil, and Satan is the name of its
-falsity. There is no individual evil spirit ruling hell, and bearing
-either of those names. An enlightened view of Scripture confirms this
-doctrine in every point, and rids us of the innumerable absurdities which
-the commonly received theory in regard to the Devil involves. There is no
-spirit in hell who was not once a man on earth. There is no spirit in
-hell who was ever an angel in heaven. The Lord himself rules the hells,
-and by all means possible restrains their violence and mitigates their
-suffering.
-
-Some people believe that God turns away his face from man, rejects him,
-and casts him into hell, and that he is angry with him on account of his
-evils; and others go still further, and affirm that God punishes man, and
-brings evil upon him. They also confirm this opinion from the literal
-sense of the Word, in which expressions occur that appear to sustain it.
-But these opinions are formed through ignorance of the real sense of
-these passages, and from a blind neglect of others, the literal sense of
-which teaches that God is goodness and mercy itself, and that fury is
-not in him. Isaiah xxvii. 4. True doctrine declares that the Lord never
-turns away his face from man, never rejects him, never casts any one into
-hell, and is never angry. The Lord is continually withdrawing man from
-evil and leading him to good; but man’s freedom is never taken away. If
-man _will love_ evil and _will do_ perversely, the Lord does not prevent.
-That man should go to hell is at variance with the Divine design; but to
-infringe man’s freedom would be to destroy his life and take from him all
-that is human, reducing him to the level of a machine or a brute. Those
-who are in hell, cast themselves down thither, and keep themselves where
-they are. “This is,” as Wilkinson says, “he last dogma of free will,—that
-of a finite being perpetuating for ever his own evil, standing fast to
-selfishness without end, excluding Omnipotence in all its dispensations,
-and making the ‘will not’ into an everlasting ‘cannot,’ to maintain
-itself out of heaven, and contrary to heaven.”
-
-This is a very brief abstract of the leading ideas in Swedenborg’s
-wondrous treatise on Heaven and Hell. We are well aware how far short it
-falls of doing full justice to the work. Let us hope that what has been
-said may induce some to make a personal acquaintance with it; and then
-they will understand the difficulties we labor under in condensing within
-a few pages its multitudinous facts and closely linked logic.
-
-It remains only to add, that the treatise on Heaven and Hell has been
-translated into English, French, and German. The English editions have
-been many, and in some cases large. The latest may be accepted as a sign
-of the times, being in the form of an eighteen-penny volume, a second
-edition of which has been called for. We lay no claim to the gift of
-prophecy, but we feel certain that the time is coming when Swedenborg’s
-“Heaven and Hell” will be the most popular and extensively read of
-religious books.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XIV.
-
- _The White Horse—The Earths in the Universe—The New Jerusalem
- and its Heavenly Doctrine._
-
-
-1. The treatise on the White Horse mentioned in the Apocalypse, forms a
-tract of about twenty pages. It is an exposition of the spiritual sense
-of Revelation xix. 11-16. It is shown that by the heavens being opened,
-the White Horse, and its rider, are represented the Lord and his Word,
-and the quality of those to whom the internal truth of the Word is
-revealed. The particulars of the text are all gone into and expounded,
-and copious references made to the Arcana Cœlestia for fuller details.
-It is to be noted that voluminous as are Swedenborg’s theological works,
-that they form one harmonious whole bound together in the unity of truth,
-and mutually confirming each other. Literature, we believe, contains no
-example of so great a mass of writing permeated with such a consistent
-spirit, and so little affected by the author’s humors and fluctuations of
-mood. So far does this uniform spirit extend, that, had it been possible,
-we might imagine his many volumes had been struck out of thought in one
-short day, instead of being written continuously through a course of
-nearly thirty years.
-
-In this small treatise we have a list of the books in our Bible which
-form the true _Word of God_. They are, in the Old Testament, the five
-books of Moses; the book of Joshua; the book of Judges; the two books
-of Samuel; the two books of Kings; the Psalms of David; the Prophets,
-Isaiah, Jeremiah, the Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos,
-Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah,
-Malachi; and, in the New Testament, the four Evangelists, Matthew, Mark,
-Luke, and John; and the Revelation. The rest have not the internal sense,
-and are not to be regarded as a part of the inspired Word. We shall
-have to speak of the plenary inspiration of the Word, when we come to
-Swedenborg’s treatise on the Sacred Scripture, and show how broad is the
-line of distinction between the Word of God and the writings of men. It
-requires but a slight acquaintance with the doctrine of correspondences,
-to perceive that this distinction between the books contained within the
-covers of the authorized version of the Bible is not arbitrary; that it
-is a distinction as marked and visible as that between God and man, or
-nature and art. Apart, however, from the doctrine of correspondences,
-the distinction may be sustained by the authority of the Jews, and the
-indirect testimony of many of the Fathers of the Christian Church,
-coupled with numerous natural reasons founded on a critical examination
-of style, etc.
-
-“The book of Job,” says Swedenborg, “was a book of the Ancient Church,”
-and therefore, with the exception of the first chapters of Genesis, is
-the oldest portion of the Bible. It has a kind of internal sense, but not
-like that of the Word.
-
-The exclusion of the Epistles from the Books of the Word, is perhaps,
-to a new reader, the most startling of Swedenborg’s announcements. For
-this exclusion and its reasons, we will simply quote his own words.
-Writing to Dr. Beyer, he says: “With regard to the writings of St. Paul,
-and the other Apostles, I have not given them a place in my ‘Arcana
-Cœlestia,’ because they are dogmatic writings merely, and are not written
-in the style of the Word, as are those of the Prophets, of David, of the
-Evangelists, and of the Revelation of St. John. The style of the Word
-consists throughout in correspondences, and thence effects immediate
-communication with heaven; but the style of these dogmatic writings is
-quite different, having, indeed, communication with heaven, but only
-mediately or indirectly. The reason why the Apostles wrote in this
-style, was, that the First Christian Church was then to begin through
-them; consequently, the same style as is used in the Word would not have
-been proper for such doctrinal tenets, which required plain and simple
-language, suited to the capacities of all readers. Nevertheless, the
-writings of the Apostles are very good books for the Church, inasmuch
-as they insist on the doctrine of charity, and faith from charity, as
-strongly as the Lord himself has done in the Gospels, and the Revelation
-of St. John, as will appear evidently to any one who studies these
-writings with attention.”
-
-2. The treatise on the “Earths in the Universe” is formed from several of
-those portions of the “Arcana Cœlestia,” occurring between the chapters,
-expository of the spiritual sense of Genesis and Exodus. It forms a
-pamphlet of about fifty pages.
-
-Many and prolonged have been the discussions as to whether other planets
-are, like our own, the abodes of human beings. Great as has been the
-progress of astronomical science, the learned are yet far from being
-unanimous on the question, as is evident from the recent controversy
-between Prof. Whewell and Sir David Brewster. Swedenborg does not
-entertain us with prolix reasonings as to whether or not the earths of
-the universe are inhabited. That was a question far too trivial for his
-masculine understanding. He saw that these vast spaces were not formed
-by the Lord, except for the highest end, the creation of a heaven of
-intelligent human beings, capable of satisfying the infinite desires
-of Divine Love. The earths of the universe are peopled even as our own
-globe, or are in course of preparation for it. Any other view than this
-is unworthy of acceptance, and dishonorable to the highest truths of
-reason and revelation.
-
-Swedenborg was permitted to see, and hold converse with, the inhabitants
-of other earths; and most interesting are his relations concerning them.
-Wilkinson aptly remarks that the work now under consideration “may be
-characterized as a Report on the Religion of the Universe.” Swedenborg
-tells us that the dwellers in these distant spheres think of the Lord and
-worship him. He describes the quality of their love and wisdom, and how
-they conduct themselves toward each other. It is a pleasant thought that
-the people of this world are the worst of humanity, the most sensual, and
-the least abounding in true intelligence and spirituality. In other words
-there is sin, and its consequent suffering, arising from the same cause
-as with us; but it is not so deep nor so wide spread. The fact of the
-Divine Incarnation is likewise known in other worlds, and is regarded as
-the great truth of faith.
-
-Swedenborg affirms that the moon is inhabited. We know that even those
-scientific men who hold to the doctrine of a plurality of worlds, do not
-believe in the habitability of the moon; because, say they, it lacks
-alike water and atmosphere. To say that it has no atmosphere is very
-unphilosophical. The atmosphere may not be of the same density as that
-of our earth; but that it should have no sphere or aura around it, we
-cannot for a moment believe. Swedenborg tells us that the Lunarians are
-dwarfs, like boys of seven years old, with robust bodies and pleasant
-countenances. They do not speak from their lungs, on account of the
-attenuated nature of their atmosphere, but from a quantity of air
-collected in the abdomen.
-
-It is but just to state that Swedenborg speaks of Saturn as the outermost
-planet of the solar system, he not being permitted to anticipate
-Herschel or Neptune. An opponent might make merry over this, and say:
-“Don’t you see that Swedenborg was but a dreamer? How could he know
-aught of the inhabitants of other earths when he did not even know that
-beyond Saturn rolled two immense worlds?” We reply, that it would have
-been disorderly for him to have become possessed of such knowledge by
-spiritual means. “But how so?” Because it would have compelled belief in
-the spiritual doctrines he taught, without due thought and examination,
-as soon as science had established the existence of these orbs; because
-miracles and prophecy are not permitted in these times, for they force
-and destroy man’s freedom. How easy it would be for the Lord to witness
-to the truth of His Word by supernatural signs in the natural world!
-Yet he does not, although belief in his Word, and life according to it,
-is essential to man’s highest happiness. Belief so induced would be
-worthless, because compelled. It may be said that this is mere special
-pleading; but it is not so. The laws laid down in a later work of
-Swedenborg’s, on the “Divine Providence,” fortify, in a most rational
-manner, the truth as we have endeavoured to set it forth. It is also to
-be remarked that natural truth must be discovered by its appropriate
-means,—natural investigation. It was necessary that Swedenborg should be
-skilled in all natural science previous to his illumination, so that he
-might possess a basis for many spiritual facts which could neither have
-been expressed nor made intelligible without at the same time giving
-their correspondence in nature. It would have been altogether contrary
-to the Divine order to have taken Swedenborg in his early youth and
-ignorance, and, making him a seer, have communicated natural truth to him
-in a supernatural manner.
-
-3. “The New Jerusalem and its Heavenly Doctrine” is a brief exposition of
-the leading truths of the New Church. After each of its chapters follow
-references, (in some cases more extensive than the chapter itself,) to
-the “Arcana Cœlestia.” These references, so numerous in Swedenborg’s
-writings, do not form a dry and unreadable index, but may be looked on
-as a series of precepts pertaining to moral and spiritual life. Were we
-gathering a volume of gems of thought, we should find an abundance to
-suit our purposes in these references.
-
-This work has been printed as a cheap pamphlet. We know of no other work
-which could more appropriately be placed in the hands of a stranger
-desiring to know, without much reading, the nature of those doctrines
-which Swedenborg was commissioned to reveal to the world.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XV.
-
- _Anecdotes._
-
-
-The trite observation that the lives of literary men are devoid of those
-incidents which make up a stirring and lively biography, applies with
-great truth to the career of Swedenborg. His quiet and unostentatious
-life afforded but few materials for anecdotes; hence we have but faint
-traces of his outward course. While writing the works we have just
-noticed, from 1747 to 1758, the principal portion of his time must have
-been passed in London. Few men in those days were capable of sympathy
-or communion with the elevated and spiritualized mind of Swedenborg.
-Yet though living as it were alone, he could not have been melancholy
-or desolate. Under the care and guidance of the Lord, favored with
-the company and converse of angels, and enjoying the consciousness of
-fulfilling high and holy duties, he had every reason to be the cheerful
-and contented man that contemporary testimony represents him. His
-evenings he used often to spend with his printer, Mr. Hart, of Poppin’s
-court, Fleet street. Mrs. Lewis, his publisher’s wife, knew him, and
-“thought him a good and sensible man, but too apt to spiritualize
-things.” Beyond a few particulars such as these, we know nothing of his
-private life.
-
-On the 19th of July, 1759, we find Swedenborg at Gottenburg. Here
-occurred the following circumstance, of which Immanuel Kant, the
-celebrated transcendentalist, is the narrator.
-
-“On Saturday, at 4 o’clock, P. M.,” says Kant, “when Swedenborg arrived
-at Gottenburg from England, Mr. William Castel invited him to his house,
-together with a party of fifteen persons. About 6 o’clock, Swedenborg
-went out, and after a short interval returned to the company, quite pale
-and alarmed. He stated that a dangerous fire had just broken out in
-Stockholm, at Sundermalm, (distant three hundred miles from Gottenburg,)
-and that it was spreading very fast. He was restless, and went out often.
-He said that the house of one of his friends, whom he named, was already
-in ashes, and that his own was in danger. At 8 o’clock, after he had been
-out again, he joyfully exclaimed: ‘Thank God! the fire is extinguished
-the third door from my house.’ This news occasioned great commotion among
-the company. It was announced to the governor the same evening. The next
-morning, Swedenborg was sent for by the governor, who questioned him
-concerning the disaster. Swedenborg described the fire precisely, how it
-had begun, in what manner it had ceased, and how long it had continued.
-On the same day the news was spread through the city; and as the governor
-had thought it worthy of attention, the consternation was considerably
-increased, as many were in trouble on account of their friends and
-property, which might have been involved in the disaster. On Monday
-evening, a messenger arrived at Gottenburg, who was despatched during the
-time of the fire. In the letters brought by him, the fire was described
-precisely in the manner stated by Swedenborg. On Tuesday morning, a royal
-courier arrived at the governor’s with the melancholy intelligence of
-the fire, of the loss it had occasioned, and of the houses damaged and
-ruined, not in the least differing from that which Swedenborg had given
-the moment it had ceased: the fire had been extinguished at 8 o’clock.
-
-“What,” continues Kant, “can be brought forward against the authenticity
-of this occurrence? My friend who wrote this to me, has not only examined
-the circumstances of this extraordinary case at Stockholm, but also,
-about two months ago, at Gottenburg, where he is acquainted with the most
-respectable houses, and where he could obtain the most authentic and
-complete information, as the greatest part of the inhabitants, who are
-still alive, were witnesses to the memorable occurrence.”
-
-This narrative is taken from a letter written by Kant, in 1768, to
-Charlotte de Knobloch, a lady of quality. Kant, it may be remarked, was
-no adherent of Swedenborg’s. Two years before writing this letter, he
-had attacked him in a small work entitled, “Dreams of the Great Seer
-Illustrated by Dreams of Metaphysics.” Received from such a source, we
-can entertain no doubt as to the truth of the story.
-
-At home, in Stockholm, Swedenborg did not fail to excite much curiosity
-and attention, and his conduct and deportment were carefully watched. It
-was observed that he seldom went to church, or received the sacrament.
-This was owing partly to the contrariety of the Lutheran doctrine to
-his own views, and partly, Robsahm says, to the disease of the stone,
-which troubled him. In 1760, two bishops, his relations, remonstrated
-with him in a friendly manner upon his remissness. He answered, that,
-religious observances were not so necessary for him as for others, as
-he was associated with angels. They then represented that his example
-would be valuable, by which argument he suffered himself to be persuaded.
-A few days previously to receiving the sacrament, he asked his old
-domestics to whom he should resort for the purpose, for “he was not
-much acquainted with the different preachers.” The elder chaplain was
-mentioned. Swedenborg objected that “he was a passionate man and a fiery
-zealot, and that he had heard him thundering from the pulpit with little
-satisfaction.” The assistant chaplain was then proposed, who was not
-so popular with the congregation. Swedenborg said, “I prefer him to the
-other, for I hear that he speaks what he thinks, and by this means has
-lost the good-will of his people, as generally happens in this world.”
-Accordingly he took the sacrament from this curate.
-
-“In general,” says Robsahm, “Swedenborg would not enter into dispute on
-matters of religion. If he was necessitated to defend himself, he did it
-with mildness and in a few words; but if any one would not be convinced,
-and became warm in argument, he retired, saying, ‘Read my writings
-attentively and without prejudice; they will answer you in my stead, and
-will afford you reason to change your ideas and opinions on such things.’
-
-“He used, at first, freely to speak of his visions and spiritual
-explications of the Scriptures; but as this displeased the clergy, who
-proclaimed him a heretic and madman, he resolved to be less communicative
-of his knowledge in company, or, at least, more cautious, lest the
-censorious should have room to blame what they could not comprehend like
-himself. I once,” says Robsahm, “addressed the rector of the parish where
-he lived, an old and respected clergyman, asking him what he thought
-of Swedenborg’s visions and explanations of the Bible. The venerable
-man answered: ‘God alone can judge of this; but I can not think him to
-be such a person as many do; I have myself conversed with him, and in
-company where we have been together, and I have found him to be a good
-and a holy man.’
-
-“It was remarkable that Swedenborg never endeavored to persuade any
-person to receive his opinions. He was in nowise led by that self-love
-which is observable in those who publish new opinions concerning church
-doctrines; neither did he seek to make many proselytes, not even
-communicating his thoughts and sentiments, except to those whom he
-thought virtuous, disposed to hear them with moderation, capable of
-comprehending them, and lovers of truth.
-
-“It is a very singular circumstance,” continues Robsahm, “that all who
-have read the writings of Swedenborg, with a desire to refute them, have
-finished the attempt by adhering to his sentiments.” This assertion must
-be received, however, with qualification.
-
-Though busied with the composition of his works, and immersed in
-spiritual contemplations, Swedenborg was not forgetful of the world
-and of his duties to his country. In 1761 he took part in the Swedish
-Diet or Parliament. Three of his memorials or addresses to the Diet,
-are preserved. In the first of these he congratulates the House upon
-its meetings, and counsels the redress of all grievances which cause
-disaffection. In the second he advocates an alliance with France instead
-of England from prudential motives, at the same time strongly protesting
-against the evil of despotic governments, and the danger to liberty in
-the extension of the Roman Catholic faith. The third memorial is on
-the subject of finance. Count Hopken, the Swedish prime minister at
-that time, leaves on record that “the most solid memorials, and the
-best penned, at the Diet of 1761, on matters of finance, were presented
-by Swedenborg; in one of which he refuted a large work in 4to on the
-same subject, quoted the corresponding passages of it, and all in less
-than one sheet.” He was likewise a member of the secret committee of
-the Diet, an office to which only the most sage and virtuous were
-elected. Consider, reader, for a moment, the dignity, the wisdom, and
-the abounding common sense which must have permeated the whole being of
-Swedenborg, to enable him to live down the obloquy attached to the name
-of a “ghost-seer,” and be received with high favor and acceptance by men
-of the world, sceptical and sensual!
-
-Soon afterwards Swedenborg left Stockholm; and we find him in July,
-1762, at Amsterdam. Jung Stilling received from a friend the following
-interesting anecdote respecting him at this time. “I was in Amsterdam,”
-says he, “in 1762, in a company in which Swedenborg was present, on the
-very day that Peter III., Emperor of Russia, died. In the midst of our
-conversation his countenance changed, and it was evident that his soul
-was no longer there, and that something extraordinary was passing in him.
-As soon as he came to himself again, he was asked what had happened to
-him. He would not at first communicate it; but at length, after having
-been repeatedly pressed, he said: ‘This very hour, the Emperor Peter III.
-has died in his prison,’ mentioning at the same time the manner of his
-death. ‘Gentlemen will please to note down the day, that they may be able
-to compare it with the intelligence of his death in the newspapers.’ The
-newspapers subsequently announced the Emperor’s death as having taken
-place on that day.”
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XVI.
-
- _Doctrines of the Lord—The Sacred Scripture, Faith, and Life._
-
-
-In 1763, Swedenborg published, at Amsterdam, the following works:—1.
-The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem respecting the Lord; 2. The Sacred
-Scripture; 3. Faith; 4. Life; 5. Continuation respecting the Last
-Judgment and the Destruction of Babylon; and 6. Angelic Wisdom concerning
-the Divine Love and the Divine Wisdom. We will now speak of these works
-seriatim.
-
-1. The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem concerning the Lord, is a small
-treatise: but within its limits is concentrated so much light and
-rationality, that we might say the question it deals with was finally
-settled, did we not too well know the perversity and pertinacity of
-theological error, in closing the mind against the perception of truth,
-though it were manifested with angelic wisdom.
-
-The great truth in the treatise is the Supreme Divinity of the Lord Jesus
-Christ. This truth is brought forth from the collation of nearly every
-passage of Scripture which, in the literal sense, bears upon the subject.
-It is shown, by an invincible logic, that there is but one God; and that,
-in the Bible itself, the doctrine of three persons in the Godhead is
-not to be found. It is then shown that God the Lord, in the fullness of
-time, came to earth, and put on human nature, or became incarnate. The
-object sought to be effected by the incarnation, was the salvation of
-man. From the days of Adam, mankind had been treading a downward path.
-Through wickedness, all true faith and spirituality had perished. Hell
-had drawn near to men, even to the possession of their bodies, as we read
-in the Gospels. Isaiah describes the state of mankind thus: “Hell hath
-enlarged herself, and opened her mouth without measure.” Humanity was
-thus hastening to destruction, and final extinction. But the Lord Jehovah
-interposed. Clothing himself with an arm of flesh, he met the powers
-of hell on their own ground; and rendering himself accessible to their
-attacks, in a series of the most direful temptation-combats, He reduced
-Hell to order, and redeemed mankind forever from the absolute dominion
-of devils. But this was not all. The human nature that the Lord had
-assumed, full of hereditary corruption, was taken from the race of Jewish
-kings, the most depraved and perverted to be found on earth. He purified,
-glorified, and made it divine, ascending with it to heaven. The new
-influences flowing through the medium of this Divine Humanity, are called
-the Holy Spirit. Of the truth of this we have the most convincing proof
-in John vii. 39, where it is said, “the Holy Ghost was _not yet, because_
-Jesus was not yet glorified.”
-
-From this it is very evident that the Trinity is not, as commonly
-taught, a Trinity of persons, but of principles. In ourselves we see
-a finite image of this Divine and Infinite Trinity. The soul of man
-may be taken as the representative of Jehovah; his body represents
-the Divine Humanity, or Jesus Christ; and his action or influence on
-others corresponds to the Holy Spirit. Regarded in this light, that
-most mystical and incomprehensible dogma of three Persons, and yet one
-God, is annihilated, and we come into the enjoyment of a faith at once
-scriptural, intelligible, and rational. It is impossible for us here to
-go into the details of this doctrine, or give even an outline of its
-proofs. To an earnest seeker after truth we can conceive no pleasure
-exceeding an acquaintance with this treatise on the Lord. If, especially,
-he has vexed and worn himself in reading the profitless controversies and
-lucubrations of learned divines on the Trinity, his fretted and heated
-mind will experience a spiritual relief similar to the natural one which
-results when patience has become exhausted in vain endeavors to unfasten
-a lock, and a skilled mechanic draws near, takes the work out of our
-hands, and with dexterity and ease accomplishes the task in a moment.
-Swedenborg lays his hand on the tangled mass of mysticism and perverted
-Scripture, and straightway the Gordian knot is untied. The simplicity of
-explanation fills us with amazement, and we wonder that it was never done
-before.
-
-2. The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem respecting the Sacred Scripture,
-next demands our attention. The primary truth of this treatise is, that
-the Sacred Scripture, or the Word, is Divine Truth itself, thus the Lord
-himself. Let us see how this can be.
-
-We are too apt to abstract books from their authors, and to regard
-them as matters impersonal,—as type and paper merely. Now this is a
-childish error, and a proof of the loose and external way in which we
-are accustomed to think. When I speak, or write, I manifest spiritual
-influences; and the force of these influences is proportionate to my
-earnestness, and their effect is proportionate to the state of reception
-of my hearers. Words are thus perceived to be the representatives of
-spiritual forces. The action of spirit on spirit is inappreciable by the
-senses; but could we look behind the veil of nature when a crowd or a
-congregation is swayed hither and thither by the speech of one man, we
-should see that the influence exerted was as real and actual as muscular
-force. From this we learn that words are not mere sounds, but are the
-sheaths or cases of spiritual life, and on this ground we at once see the
-force of the Lord’s declaration, “The words that I speak unto you, they
-are spirit, and they are life.” John vi. 63.
-
-When we think of the Lord’s words, we must conjoin with the thought an
-idea of the Divine Nature and Attributes. The Lord’s speech being the
-manifestation of His life, must partake of its every quality, thus of
-infinity and of independence of time, and consequently of adaptation to
-every possible condition of mind, for infinity includes all. Bearing
-these facts in mind, we can easily perceive how true it is that the Word
-is the Lord Himself.
-
-But while the Word in its inmost is the Lord, and is thus infinite, yet
-as apprehended by man, who is finite, it necessarily wears a finite
-aspect. It is plain that as man’s ideas become sensualized and bound
-down to matter, his view of the Divine Truth, or Word, must involve many
-illusions; true, certainly, in relation to him, but very far removed from
-the absolute Divine Truth. Now the literal sense of the Word, as we read
-it in our Bibles, is the presentation, if we may so phrase it, of the
-aspect of the Lord to the natural man, whose senses constitute his court
-of appeal. The Jews, to whom the Word in its literal sense was delivered,
-were just such men.
-
-Above this natural state of mind, there are two marked grades of
-intelligence—the spiritual and celestial. To these, the Lord’s words bear
-a far wider meaning, and are more fully instinct with the glory of the
-Divine Wisdom, and the warmth of the Divine Love.
-
-It is thus said that the Word of God has three senses—the natural, the
-spiritual, and the celestial. We attribute these senses to the Word:
-more correctly we should charge them to the universal human mind, whose
-capacity of reception they express. To no two men, or angels, does the
-Lord,—or in fact anything,—bear precisely the same appearance, or suggest
-the same meaning.
-
-These three grades, separated by discrete degrees, make up the universe
-of humanity; and the enlightened eye of the true philosopher may trace
-in every object of external creation an image and representation of
-them. But space forbids further explanation on this head; our author’s
-reasoning is, moreover, so closely linked as to admit of no curtailment.
-Suffice to say, that after demonstrating the existence of an internal
-sense in the Scripture, he proceeds to show the many uses of the literal
-sense, and, at the same time, the manifold abuses to which it is liable,
-when the laws by which it is written are not understood.
-
-Accepting the sublime philosophy of this treatise, we find in it a
-perfect refuge from the attacks of the sceptic, and discover a thousand
-reasons for one we had before, for loving God’s Holy Book, trusting in
-its wisdom, and committing our lives to its guidance.
-
-3. The Doctrine of Faith of the New Jerusalem, may be best understood by
-a few extracts from the treatise itself. Swedenborg writes: “The idea
-attached to the term faith at the present day is this, that it consists
-in thinking a thing to be so, because it is taught by the church, and
-because it does not fall within the scope of the understanding. For it
-is usual with those who inculcate it, to say, ‘You must believe, and not
-doubt.’ If you answer: ‘I do not comprehend it,’ it is replied: ‘That is
-the very circumstance which makes a doctrine an object of faith.’ Thus
-the faith of the present day is a faith in what is not known, and may be
-called a blind faith: and as being the dictate of one person abiding in
-the mind of another, it is a historical faith. But this is not spiritual
-faith.
-
-“Genuine faith is an acknowledgment that a thing is so, because it
-is true. For he who is in genuine faith thinks and speaks to this
-effect:—‘This is true; and therefore I believe it.’ For faith is the
-assurance with which we embrace that which is true; and that which is
-true is the proper object of faith. A person of this character, also, if
-he does not comprehend a sentiment, and see its truth, will say: ‘I do
-not know whether this is true or not; therefore I do not yet believe it.
-How can I believe what I do not comprehend? Perhaps it may be false.’
-
-“But the common language is, that nobody can comprehend things of a
-spiritual or theological nature, because they transcend our natural
-faculties. Spiritual truths, however, are as capable of being
-comprehended as natural truths. The reason that spiritual things admit of
-being comprehended, is, because man, as to his understanding, is capable
-of being elevated into the light of heaven, in which light no other
-objects appear than such as are spiritual.
-
-“Hence now it is that those who are in the spiritual affection of truth,
-enjoy an internal acknowledgment of it. As the angels are in that
-affection, they utterly reject the tenet that the understanding ought
-to be kept in subjection to faith: for they say, ‘How can you believe a
-thing, when you do not see whether it is true or not?’ And should any one
-affirm that what he advances must nevertheless be believed, they reply:
-‘Do you think yourself a God, that I am to believe you? or that I am mad,
-that I should believe an assertion in which I do not see any truth? If I
-must believe it, cause me to see it.’ The dogmatizer is thus constrained
-to retire. Indeed, the wisdom of the angels consists solely in this, that
-they see and comprehend what they think.
-
-“There is a spiritual idea of which few have any knowledge, which enters
-by influx into the minds of those who are in the affection of truth, and
-dictates interiorly whether the thing which they are hearing or reading
-is true or not. In this idea are those who read the Word in illumination
-from the Lord. To be in illumination is to be in perception. Those who
-are in this illumination are said to be taught of Jehovah, and of them
-it is said in Jeremiah: ‘Behold, the days come that I will make a new
-covenant:—this shall be the covenant,—I will put my law in their inward
-parts, and write it in their hearts; and they shall teach no more every
-man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know ye the Lord;
-for they shall all know me.’ xxxi. 31, 33, 34.
-
-“From these considerations it is plain that faith and truth are one. This
-also is the reason that the ancients, who were more accustomed to think
-of truth from affection than the moderns, instead of faith used the word
-truth: and for the same reason, in the Hebrew language, truth and faith
-are expressed by one and the same word, amuna, or amen.
-
-“If any one thinks with himself, or says to another, ‘Who can have that
-internal acknowledgment of truth which is faith? I can not.’ I will tell
-him how he may. Shun evils as sins, and apply to the Lord; then you will
-have as much as you desire.”
-
-Such then is the New Church doctrine of faith. Faith is the perception
-and acknowledgment of truth from a right understanding of it. True faith
-is something that grows. It is not the gift of a moment. It is attained
-by leading a good life, and through obedience to the truth so far as we
-know it. In the course of time we find that a pure life is clearing our
-spiritual vision, and extending its range. Spiritual truths which we had
-laid up in our memories, and perhaps fancied that we had believed, are
-brought forth, are seen in new and striking light, are elevated into
-the understanding, and are in reality believed. Thus a living faith is
-attained. This doctrine finds a Divine seal in these words of the Lord:
-“If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it
-be of God.” John vii. 17.
-
-The remainder of this little treatise is taken up with an exposure of
-the fallacies involved in the common doctrines of faith prevailing in the
-Protestant and Roman Catholic churches. Faith separated from charity,
-is proved to have no existence, because evil can by no possibility love
-truth. Spiritual and Divine Truth may, it is true, be reasoned upon,
-defended, and expounded, by wicked men, for the promotion of their own
-selfish ends; but internally they are in deep hatred and denial of them,
-and in the other life their detestation of them causes them to cast them
-forth even from the memory. Thus the wicked have no faith and no truth.
-
-4. The treatise on the Doctrine of Life is a brief and compendious
-exposition of the nature of that life which leads to heaven and
-happiness. In the first place, it asserts that all religion has relation
-to life, and that the life of religion is to do good; agreeable to the
-Lord’s saying: “He that hath my commandments and keepeth them, he it is
-that loveth me.” John xiii. 17. It is then shown that no one can do good,
-which is really good, from himself, as is taught in John, where we read:
-“A man can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven,” iii.
-27; and again: “He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth
-forth much fruit; for without me ye can do nothing;”—“He that abideth in
-me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit,” signifies that
-all good is from the Lord; fruit signifies good: “without me ye can do
-nothing,” signifies that no one can do good from himself.
-
-Now, it may be asked, “Why can a man not do good of himself?” For this
-simple reason, that, as there is no goodness out of the Lord, if man
-does good, his power and disposition to do it must, in all certainty,
-be derived from the Lord alone. Man, in his highest state, is but a
-medium for the manifestation of the Divine Life or Goodness. Yet while
-only a medium, he must act in freedom, as of himself. The appearance is
-that the good he does is self-originated, and born of his own will; and
-this appearance can never be removed, because on it depends his freedom
-of action. Man must subdue all tendencies to spiritual pride arising
-therefrom, by habitual reference to the truth that the Lord is all in
-all; and that if he has done good, or been useful, he has been indebted
-for the motive as well as for the wisdom, to the Divine Mercy alone; as
-Paul said to the Philippians: “For it is God which worketh in you _both
-to will and to do_ of his good pleasure.” ii. 15. While thus saved by
-the Divine Mercy, through a good life, and brought into spiritual health
-by obedience to divine laws, man has no reason whatever to boast, or to
-take credit to himself for his bliss and salvation. The advocates of
-justification and salvation by faith alone, charge spiritual pride and
-merit, as a necessity, upon all who believe that heaven and its happiness
-are attained through the regenerative influence of a good life; but this
-accusation falls to the ground when it is acknowledged that the power to
-lead a good life is the continual gift and inspiration of God. If man
-would only think truly, he would see that humility is the acknowledgment
-of the grand primal truth of existence, that nothing we have or can do
-that is good, is of ourselves, but solely of the Lord; and that just as
-we are left to ourselves and our own wisdom, we do evil, and perpetrate
-folly and mischief. Salvation through a good life, when thus rightly
-stated and understood, is seen to involve nothing of merit, but only the
-strongest reasons for gratitude, humility, and worship.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XVII.
-
- _The Divine Love and Divine Wisdom—The Continuation of the Last
- Judgment._
-
-
-The treatise on the Divine Love and Wisdom, is a book which, when
-mastered, affords a key to the whole philosophy of the New Church, and to
-a rational understanding of all the writings of Swedenborg. When we say
-this, it will be easily understood that it is not a book to be read in a
-few hours, or hastily glanced over. Every page is pregnant with thought,
-and many of its paragraphs might be expanded into volumes. It is a book
-which, full of thought on the deepest subjects, demands an exercise of
-like thought on the part of its reader; and if he has patience, and a
-simple love of truth for its own sake, happy will he be when he has made
-himself familiar with the divine thoughts which, like stars, gem every
-page of this matchless treatise.
-
-The book is divided into five Parts. The First Part sets forth, in the
-simplest language, the doctrine of the Divine Nature. The Lord’s essence
-is shown to be Infinite Love, and its manifestation to be Infinite
-Wisdom. It is proved that the Divine Love is the only life in the
-universe, and that in God “all things live, move, and have their being.”
-The Lord is also proved to be very and essential Man, yet above and
-independent of all space and time, filling all spaces of the universe
-without space, and all time without time; and being in the greatest
-and the least things evermore the same. These statements may appear
-inconsequential, but in our limited space, we can not explain more
-fully. We could not give the proofs satisfactorily, without quoting the
-volume itself. Argument is so linked to argument, that they hardly admit
-of separation.
-
-The Second Part of the work treats of the sun of heaven, and the sun of
-our world. It is shown that from the Lord flows a Divine Sphere, which
-appears in the spiritual world as a sun. From its heat, angels and man
-have their love, and from its light their wisdom, thus their life. This
-sun is not God, but it is the first proceeding from the Divine Love and
-the Divine Wisdom of God-Man. By means of this sun the Lord created the
-universe and all things in it. The sun of the natural world is pure fire,
-and therefore dead; and since nature derives its origin from that sun, it
-also is dead. Without two suns, the one living and the other dead, there
-could be no creation. The end of creation is, that all things may return
-to the Creator, and conjunction may exist in its ultimates.
-
-Part Third declares that in the spiritual world there are atmospheres,
-waters and earths, as in the natural world; but that the former are
-spiritual, whereas the latter are natural. We are then introduced to the
-doctrine of degrees—a doctrine which must be studied and understood,
-before any one can with justice speak of Swedenborg; for it is a doctrine
-which lies at the basis of that peerless spiritual philosophy of which he
-was the promulgator. All that we can do here in the way of exposition,
-is to quote the heads of his articles which express the truth far more
-lucidly than we could do.
-
-“There are three degrees of Love and wisdom, and thence degrees of
-heat and light, and degrees of atmosphere. Degrees are of two kinds,
-degrees of altitude and degrees of latitude. The degrees of altitude
-are homogeneous, and one derived from the other in a series, like end,
-cause, and effect. The first degree is in all the subsequent degrees.
-All perfections increase and ascend with degrees, and according to
-degrees. In successive order the first degree constitutes the highest,
-and the third the lowest; but in simultaneous order, the first degree
-constitutes the inmost, and the third the outmost. The ultimate degree is
-the complex, continent, and basis, of the prior degrees. The degrees of
-altitude in their ultimate, are in their fullness and power. There are
-degrees of both kinds in the greatest and least of all created things.
-There are three infinite and uncreated degrees of altitude in the Lord,
-and three finite and created degrees in man. These three degrees of
-altitude are in every man from his birth, and may be opened successively,
-and as they are opened, a man is in the Lord, and the Lord in him.
-Spiritual light flows into man by three degrees, but not spiritual heat,
-except so far as he avoids evils as sins, and looks to the Lord. If the
-superior or spiritual degree is not opened in a man, he becomes natural
-and sensual. The natural degree of the human mind, considered in itself,
-is continuous, but by correspondence with the two superior degrees, while
-it is elevated, it appears as if it were discrete.
-
-“The natural mind, being the tegument and continent of the higher degrees
-of the human mind, is a re-agent; and if the superior degrees are not
-opened, it acts against them, but if they are opened, it acts with them.
-The abuse of the faculties which are proper to man, called rationality
-and liberty, is the origin of evil. A bad man may enjoy these two
-faculties as well as a good man; but a bad man abuses them to confirm
-evils and falses, while a good man uses them to confirm goods and truths.
-Evils and falses, when confirmed, remain; and become parts of a man’s
-love and life. The things which become parts of a man’s love and thence
-of his life, are communicated hereditarily to his offspring.
-
-“All these evils and consequent falses, both hereditary and acquired,
-reside in the natural mind. Evils and falses are entirely opposed to
-goods and truths; because evils and falses are diabolical and infernal,
-and goods and truths are divine and heavenly. The natural mind, which is
-in evils and falses, is a form and image of hell, and descends by three
-degrees. These three degrees of the natural mind, which is an image and
-form of hell, are opposed to the three degrees of the spiritual mind,
-which is a form and image of heaven: thus the natural mind which is a
-hell, is in complete opposition to the spiritual mind which is a heaven.
-All things of the three degrees of the natural mind, are included in
-works, which are performed by acts of the body.”
-
-Part Fourth teaches that the Lord from eternity, who is Jehovah, created
-the universe and all things therein from Himself, and not from nothing;
-this would not have been possible if the Lord were not a Divine Man; He
-from himself producing the sun of the spiritual world, and by it creating
-all things. In the substances and matters of which earths consist, there
-is nothing of the Divine in itself; but still they are from the Divine
-in itself. All created things in the created universe, viewed from uses,
-represent man in an image; this testifies that God is Man. All things
-created by the Lord are uses; and they are uses in the order, degree, and
-respect, in which they have relation to man, and by man to the Lord their
-Creator. Evil uses were not created by the Lord, but originated together
-with hell, after man’s fall. The visible things in the created universe
-testify that nature has produced nothing, and does produce nothing; but
-that the Divine has produced and does produce all things from Himself,
-and through the spiritual world.
-
-Part Fifth is devoted to a description of man’s spiritual nature. It
-is shown that “the Lord has formed and created in man two receptacles
-and habitations for Himself, called the will and the understanding;
-the will for His Divine Love, and the understanding for His Divine
-Wisdom. The will and understanding are in the brains, in the whole and
-every part thereof, and thence in the body, in the whole and every part
-thereof. There is a correspondence of the will with the heart, and of the
-understanding with the lungs; and all things that can be known of the
-will and understanding, or of love and wisdom, consequently all that can
-be known of man’s soul, may be known from the correspondence of the heart
-with the will, and of the understanding with the lungs.”
-
-There are many volumes in the world whose thinly spun thought, spread
-over page after page, it would be easy to condense into one brief
-paragraph; but the treatise on the Divine Love and Wisdom is not such a
-work. It is one of those rare books which suggest and expand thought,
-but can bear no abridgment or compression. We have well studied it, but
-do not expect to finish it during our life on earth. Time was, when,
-immersed in man made systems of faith, and wont to walk abroad in the
-green fields and woods, by the sea-side, and on the mountains—we found
-it difficult, nay we should rather say impossible, to see the God we
-read of in our books, and thought of in our chamber, to be the same kind
-Father to whom those wide and beauteous scenes owed their existence.
-Justification by faith—Jerusalem—the Jews—ephod and teraphim—the Temple,
-and the sacrifice—seemed to have no connection with the landscape, the
-wind, the falling rain, the flowing river, and the broad and limitless
-ocean. We knew it should not be so. If the Bible were God’s book, it must
-have some closer affinity with his great work of nature. We knew that
-one Lord was over all, and that this disunity should by no means exist.
-Much mental pain and travail were our portion. The easy soothsayings of
-Atheism beguiled us. We “wandered in the wilderness in a solitary way,
-and found no city (doctrine) to dwell in.” We longed for the rest of
-Zion. We sighed not in vain. The divine philosophy of this precious book
-was revealed to us, and we knew the blessing of a faith which finds a
-confirmation in every item and phase of creation, and makes the Bible and
-nature evermore at one, each confirming and illustrating the other. It
-gave to life new aims and aspects. It brought a mental peace we had never
-hoped to enjoy, and we went on our journey of life rejoicing.
-
-“The Continuation of the Last Judgment,” is a small pamphlet forming a
-supplement to the treatise on the Last Judgment, with which it is now
-generally published. It contains a very interesting account of the Last
-Judgment upon the Reformed. By the Reformed, upon whom the Last Judgment
-was effected, Swedenborg means those who professed a belief in God, read
-the Word, heard sermons, partook of the sacrament of the Supper, yet
-lived in all manner of evils. Living like Christians in externals, and
-outwardly in unity with heaven, while inwardly united with hell, they
-were permitted after death to form societies, and to live as in the
-world; and by arts unknown in the world, to cause splendid appearances,
-and by this means to persuade themselves and others that they were in
-heaven. From this outward appearance, therefore, they called their
-societies heavens. The heavens and the lands in which they dwelt, are
-understood by the “former heaven, and the former earth, which passed
-away.” Rev. xxi. 7.
-
-At the time of the Last Judgment, the hypocrisy of these spirits was
-revealed in the light of heaven, and the simple good with whom they had
-associated, separated themselves with horror from them. No longer able
-to simulate Christian lives, they rushed with delight into evils and
-crimes of every description, openly appeared as devils, and found for
-themselves the hells corresponding to their loves. At the same time all
-the splendid appearances they had made for themselves vanished away;
-their palaces were turned into vile huts; their gardens into stagnant
-pools; their temples into piles of rubbish; and the hills on which they
-dwelt, into heaps of gravel, in correspondence with their depraved
-dispositions and lusts.
-
-“After the Judgment was effected,” writes Swedenborg, “there was joy
-in heaven, and also light in the world of spirits, such as was not
-before. A similar light also then arose on men in the world, giving
-them new enlightenment. I then saw angelic spirits, in great numbers,
-rising from below, and elevated into heaven. They were the sheep there
-reserved, and guarded by the Lord for ages back, lest they should come
-into the malignant sphere of the dragonists, and their charity be
-suffocated. These are they who are understood in the Word by those who
-went forth from the sepulchers; also by the souls of those slain for the
-testimony of Jesus, who were watching; and by those who are of the first
-resurrection.”
-
-After this follows a description of many things seen in the spiritual
-world. He writes: “There are lands in the spiritual world, just as in the
-natural world: there are hills and mountains, plains and valleys, also
-fountains and rivers, lakes and seas; there are paradises, and gardens
-and groves, and woods, and palaces, and houses; there are writings, and
-books, functions, [_functiones_,] and employments; there are precious
-stones, gold and silver; in short, there are all the things, in general
-and in particular, which exist in the natural world; but in the heavens
-all these things are infinitely more perfect.”
-
-He then describes “the noble English nation” in the spiritual world;
-the more excellent of whom are in the centre of all Christians, because
-they have interior intellectual light. This light they derive from the
-liberty they enjoy of thinking, and thence of speaking and writing. The
-Dutch are then described, and then the Papists, and the Popish saints.
-The Mohammedans, the Africans, and the Gentiles follow; and finally
-the Jews, the Quakers, and the Moravians. The description of all these
-people, as they appear beyond the grave, has an interest of a most
-absorbing kind; and the light thrown by Swedenborg on their internal
-character, serves to show cause for much that happens in the external
-world, otherwise difficult of explanation.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XVIII.
-
- _Angelic Wisdom Concerning the Divine Providence._
-
-
-Still living in Amsterdam, Swedenborg published, in 1764, his work
-entitled “Angelic Wisdom Concerning the Divine Providence.” Its purpose
-is to
-
- “assert eternal Providence,
- And justify the ways of God to man.”
-
-In the first place, it is shown that the Divine Providence is the
-government of the Love and the Wisdom of the Lord. This Providence has
-for its sole end the formation of a heaven from the human race, and thus
-has respect only to what is infinite and eternal. In the Divine sight,
-things temporal and natural are of no importance except so far as they
-contribute to man’s salvation.
-
-Although the Lord thus wills and works for man’s eternal happiness, yet,
-after all, heaven can only be attained through man’s coöperation. The
-Lord ever performs his share of the work, but man too often fails to do
-his. Weeping over Jerusalem, the Lord exclaimed: “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem,
-thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto
-thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a
-hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, _and ye would not_!” Matthew
-xxiii. 37. How powerfully and tenderly is here expressed the Divine
-willingness to save, and how pointedly and decisively is man’s misery
-attributed to his own obstinacy. As the Lord Jesus is another place
-says: “Ye _will not_ come to me that ye might have life.” John v. 40.
-
-In all the operations of the Divine Providence, human freedom is
-respected. The Lord forces no man to do what is good, or believe what
-is true. He drives none to heaven. It is of the Divine Providence that
-whatsoever a man hears, sees, thinks, speaks, and does, should appear
-altogether as his own. Without this appearance, men would have no
-reception of Divine Truth, no determination to do good, no appropriation
-of love and wisdom or of charity and faith, and thence no conjunction
-with the Lord; consequently no reformation and regeneration, and thereby
-salvation. Without this appearance, it is evident there could be no
-repentance and no faith; and man would not be man, but void of rational
-life like a beast. It is plain, then, that in order that man may be
-saved, he must be induced to live a good life by means which in nowise
-trench upon this appearance of free and independent life. Regeneration is
-effected by man’s removing evils from his external life, _as of himself_;
-yet, knowing that all good and truth is from the Lord, he acknowledges,
-as a consequence, that all power to remove these evils is derived from
-the Lord alone.
-
-Intensely as the Lord desires that man should shun evils and lead a holy
-life in obedience to his commandments, yet He only seeks to win man to
-peace and heaven by means which do not infringe upon his freedom. It is a
-law of His Divine Providence, that man should not be forced by external
-means to think and will, and so to believe and love the things which are
-of religion. It has been asked by atheists, “If there be a God, why does
-he not write so on the sun, and so save men from unbelief?” Swedenborg
-answers this question most satisfactorily, by showing that miracles,
-signs, visions, conversations with the dead, threats, and punishments,
-are totally ineffective to produce that state of love and spiritual life
-which make true happiness and heaven; because these force, and destroy
-the rationality and liberty which constitute the inmost life of humanity,
-and by the exercise of which, man can alone be delivered from evil.
-
-Let us read Swedenborg’s testimony on miracles. He writes: “That such
-is the nature of miracles, may plainly appear from those wrought before
-the Jewish and Israelitish people. Although they saw so many miracles in
-Egypt, afterwards at the Red Sea, others in the Desert, and especially
-upon Mount Sinai, when the law was promulgated, yet, in the space of a
-month, when Moses tarried upon that mountain, they made themselves a
-golden calf, and acknowledged it for Jehovah who brought them out of
-the land of Egypt. The same also may appear from the miracles wrought
-afterwards in the land of Canaan, notwithstanding which the people
-so often departed from the worship that was commanded; and from the
-miracles which the Lord wrought before them when he was in the world,
-notwithstanding which they crucified him. The reason why miracles were
-wrought among the Jews and Israelites was, because they were altogether
-external men, and were introduced into the land of Canaan merely that
-they might represent a church and its internal principles by the external
-things of worship; and a wicked man may be representative, as well as a
-good man. The external things of worship among them were rituals, all
-which signified spiritual and celestial things. Even Aaron, although
-he made the golden calf, and conducted the worship of it, could,
-nevertheless, represent the Lord and his work of salvation. And as they
-could not, by the internal principles of worship, be led to represent
-these things, therefore they were led, yea forced and compelled, to
-do it by miracles. The reason why they could not be brought to such
-representation by the internal principles of worship was, because they
-did not acknowledge the Lord, although the whole Word, which was among
-them, treats of Him only; and he who does not acknowledge the Lord, can
-not receive any internal worship. But after the Lord manifested himself,
-and was received and acknowledged in the churches as the eternal God,
-miracles ceased.
-
-“The effect of miracles upon the good, however, is different from what
-it is upon the wicked. The good do not desire miracles, but they believe
-the miracles which are recorded in the Word; and if they hear anything
-of a miracle, they attend no otherwise to it than as a light argument
-which confirms their faith; for they think from the Word, consequently
-from the Lord, and not from a miracle. It is otherwise with the wicked:
-they indeed may be driven and forced into faith, and even into worship
-and piety, but only for a short time; for their evils being shut in,
-the inclinations thereto, and the delights thence derived, continually
-act against the external of their worship and piety; and in order that
-these evils may escape from confinement and break out, they think
-about the miracle, and at length call it a delusion, or an artifice,
-or an operation of nature, and so return into their evils; and he who
-returns into his evils after worship, profanes the truths and goods
-of worship, and the lot of profaners after death is the worst of all.
-Besides, if miracles were to be wrought before those who do not believe
-in consequence of the miracles recorded in the Word, they must be
-continually performed, and constantly presented to their view. From these
-considerations, the reason may appear why miracles are not performed at
-this day.”
-
-It is thus seen that the Lord will not force a man to lead a good life;
-because, in forcing him, his humanity would be destroyed, and all that
-makes life worthy and manly would be lost, seeing that the exercise of
-rationality and liberty would be annihilated.
-
-It is a law of the Divine Providence, that a man should be led and taught
-from the Lord out of heaven by the Word, and by doctrine and preaching
-from the Word, and this in all appearance as from himself. The Lord, as
-we have before seen, is the Word; and when man reads the Word, he brings
-his thought into contact with the Divine Wisdom, and when he obeys its
-teachings he is in very truth led by the Lord. Yet we all see that this
-teaching and leading of the Lord is effected without any violation of
-man’s freedom, for he is led and taught in externals to all appearance as
-of himself.
-
-It is a law of the Divine Providence that a man should not perceive and
-feel anything of the operation of the Divine Providence, but yet should
-know and acknowledge it. If a man perceived and felt the operation of the
-Divine Providence, he would not act from liberty according to reason,
-nor would anything appear to him as his own. It would also be the same
-if he foreknew events. “The reason why it is not granted man to foreknow
-events, is, that he may be able to act from liberty according to reason;
-also, that there is nothing that a man revolves in his reason which is
-not from a desire that it may come into effect by thought. If, therefore,
-he knew the effect or event from divine prediction, reason would become
-quiescent, and with reason love; for love, with reason, terminates in the
-effect, and from that begins anew. It is the very delight of reason, that
-from love in the thought it may see the effect,—not in the effect, but
-before it, or not in the present, but in the future. Hence a man has what
-is called Hope, which in reason increases and decreases, as it sees or
-expects the event. This delight is fulfilled in the event, but afterwards
-is obliterated with the thought concerning the event; and it would be the
-same with an event foreknown.” The whole zest of life would be dissipated
-could man foreknow the future.
-
-While the operation of the Divine Providence is thus veiled from man’s
-eyes, and it appears to him that he is alone in the world, and that on
-his small prudence hangs all things,—if he would be wise he must not
-be led by appearances, but rising above them, acknowledge the truth
-“that self-derived prudence is nothing, and _only appears as if it were
-something_, [and ought so to appear;] but that the Divine Providence in
-things most singular is universal.” And because our life and intelligence
-are momentarily derived from the Lord, it follows as a necessary
-consequence, that all which we do that is orderly and effective, is done
-by the Lord, through our yielding ourselves to Him as His instruments.
-
-It is often urged as a reason against believing in an overruling
-and universal Divine Providence, that the world is full of evil and
-wickedness; and if there be an omnipotent God, he would surely never
-suffer such things to exist. Swedenborg enters very fully into this
-question. The reasons why Adam was permitted to fall, and Cain to slay
-Abel; Solomon to establish idolatrous worship, and many kings after
-him to profane the holy things of the church, the Jews to crucify the
-Lord; why impiety is allowed to exist, and the impious and profligate
-to be promoted to riches and honors, while the worshipers of God and
-the doers of righteousness remain in contempt and poverty; why wars are
-permitted, men slaughtered, the property of the innocent destroyed, and
-victories go with force and not with justice; why the earth is permitted
-to remain covered with idolatries, and the Christian religion to occupy
-so small a place, and even there to be deeply corrupted and devastated
-with heresies,—are stated at length and most satisfactorily. It is made
-plain, that, were the Lord to interfere and prevent such evils by force,
-it would defeat the end for which He created man, namely, salvation and
-eternal life in heaven. Now as man can only be regenerated and enter
-heaven through the free exercise of his understanding and free choice
-of his will, any external interference of the Divine Providence with
-outward circumstances would suspend the action of man’s faculties; would,
-in short, dehumanise the race, and leave only animals to be dealt with.
-It is not of the Lord’s will, indeed, that evil should exist; and His
-Providence is unceasingly exerted to modify and mitigate it, alike in its
-origin and in its effect; but, since to prevent its manifestation would
-be to take from man all that makes him man, its permission is a necessity.
-
-It was said that the Providence of the Lord is unceasingly exerted
-to modify and mitigate evil, alike in its origin and in its effects.
-Swedenborg very beautifully and amply illustrates this truth, and shows
-that the Divine Providence is equally with the wicked and the good. The
-wicked man, of his own free choice, continually plunges himself more and
-more deeply into evil; because as he wills and does evil, he introduces
-himself more and more deeply into infernal societies. But the Lord, by a
-thousand invisible means, continually withdraws him from evil; and where
-a cure or complete prevention is impossible, mitigates his fearful fate
-by providing circumstances and situations in life which serve to lead
-the evil into less hurtful developments. The operation of the Divine
-Providence in saving man begins at his birth, and continues to the end
-of his life. The Lord sees what a man is, and what he desires to be,
-consequently what he will be; therefore the Lord foresees his state after
-death, and provides for it from his birth to the end of his life; with
-the wicked He provides by permitting and continually withdrawing them
-from evils; with the good He provides by leading them to good. Thus the
-Divine Providence is continually in the effort to save men; but more
-cannot be saved than desire to be saved. Those who acknowledge God and
-are led by Him, desire to be saved; and those who do not acknowledge
-God, but guide themselves, do not desire to be saved: for the latter do
-not think of eternal life and salvation, but the former do. This the
-Lord sees; but still He leads them according to the laws of His Divine
-Providence, against which He cannot act, for to act against them would be
-to act against Himself. Now, as the Lord foresees the states of all after
-death, and knows the places of those who are not willing to be saved, He,
-as far as is consistent with human freedom, labors to soften man’s evil;
-and if He cannot lead him to heaven, still preserves him from sinking to
-the lowest hell.
-
-From this it follows that every man may be reformed, that there is no
-such thing as predestination, and that it is a man’s own fault if he is
-not saved. All are created for heaven, and none for hell; and if man
-sink into perdition, he does so through his own obstinacy, and through
-the deliberate choice of a life of evil. As saith the Apostle: “The Lord
-is long-suffering to usward, _not willing that any should perish_, but
-that all should come to repentance.” 2 Peter iii. 9. And the Lord himself
-says: “Fear not, little flock; it is your _Father’s good pleasure to give
-you the kingdom_.” Luke xii. 32.
-
-Such, in brief, are a few of the principles in the treatise on the Divine
-Providence. Nothing but a perusal of the work can give an adequate idea
-of its multiplicity of details, from the laws which regulate the affairs
-of kingdoms, to those which govern games of chance; and all expounded
-with a lucidity of thought, which finds few parallels in works on
-such recondite themes. No book in the whole circle of literature more
-satisfactorily disposes of the objections against religion, current
-among secularists and worldlings. The inward temptations and doubts of
-the devout heart, and the weariness, cares, and fret of life, are shown
-in its pages to be all permitted by that Divine Love which suffers
-not a sparrow to fall unheeded; and the minutest incidents of life are
-seen to be forever encircled by that Omniscience, which knows how most
-effectually to guard us from evil and draw us into the holy courts of
-heaven.
-
-Any view which we take of the Divine Providence that does not recognize
-this life as a beginning, a progress, and not a consummation, is
-necessarily erroneous. Life here is but a discipline, an apprenticeship.
-It is a school wherein we are scholars, learning such lessons as will
-fit us for uses in a higher and eternal sphere. Were life consummated by
-what men call death, we might have reason to complain that the comforts
-and pleasures of existence were so unequally distributed; and the natural
-man might exclaim with the Psalmist: “I was envious at the foolish, when
-I saw the prosperity of the wicked. They are not in trouble as other
-men; neither are they plagued like other men. Their eyes stand out with
-fatness: they have more than heart could wish. Behold, these are the
-ungodly who prosper in the world; they increase in riches.” But when we
-look at the matter from higher grounds, and in the light of the Divine
-wisdom, or as the Psalmist did when he said: “I went into the sanctuary
-of God; then understood I their end: how are they brought into desolation
-as in a moment! they are utterly consumed with terrors:”—“The evil doers
-shall be cut off; but those that wait upon the Lord, they shall inherit
-the earth: for yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be; yea thou
-shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be: for the Lord
-loveth judgment, and forsaketh not his saints;”—then we obtain a right
-view of the matter, and find an all-sufficient reason for being patient
-and not fretting ourselves. Hard though our lot in life may seem, let us
-remember that
-
- “The vain and fleeting things of earth,
- (Though counted vain, alas! by few,)
- In his esteem are nothing worth,
- Who keeps eternal ends in view.”
-
-Or, as Cowper says:
-
- “The path of sorrow and that path alone,
- Leads to the land where sorrow is unknown.
- No traveler ever reached that blest abode
- Who found not thorns and briers in his road.”
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XIX.
-
- _Life in Amsterdam—Character of the Dutch—Meets Dr.
- Beyer—Republishes his “New Method of Finding the
- Longitudes”—The Apocalypse Explained._
-
-
-It is very trying to the biographer of Swedenborg that he can find so
-little to narrate of his outward life. Of his life in Amsterdam we have
-no particulars whatever. No Boswell was there to note down his sayings,
-describe his doings, his company, and conduct. But had even a Boswell
-been there, we fear he would have found but little to note. Quiet days
-in his study, calm reserve toward all around, musing, solitary rambles
-in the streets, would supply but few incidents for the pen of the
-biographer. We must be content to know that, from out his quiet study in
-Amsterdam, proceeded books destined to be centers of spiritual light to
-the church and to the world.
-
-Swedenborg liked the Dutch, and with good reason, for he was favored to
-know them in that land where the secrets of all hearts are unveiled. He
-reports that the Dutch, above all other people, are under the influence
-of the _spiritual_ love of trade, valuing it for its uses, and regarding
-money only as a means to these uses, and not, like the Jews, as the final
-end. They are, moreover, inflexible in their obedience to the truth, when
-known; and in many other respects are an estimable people.
-
-It is probable that Swedenborg returned home toward the end of 1764;
-for in the first half of the next year, we find him in Stockholm. Soon,
-however, he set out upon new travels; and in 1765, while at Gottenburg,
-waiting for a vessel to England, he accidentally (as men say) met
-with Dr. Beyer, Professor of Greek, and a member of the Consistory of
-Gottenburg. Having heard that Swedenborg was mad, he was surprised
-to hear him talk sensibly, and manifest no symptom of his suspected
-infirmity. He therefore invited Swedenborg to dine with him the following
-day, in company with Dr. Rosen. After dinner, Dr. Beyer expressed a
-desire to hear from himself a full account of his doctrines; upon
-which Swedenborg, animated by the request, spoke so clearly, and in so
-wonderful a manner, that the Doctor and his friend were quite astonished.
-They gave him no interruption; but when he ceased, Dr. Beyer requested
-Swedenborg to meet him the next day at Mr. Wenngren’s and to bring with
-him a paper, containing the substance of his conversation, in order that
-he might consider it more attentively. Swedenborg came the day following,
-according to promise; and, taking the paper out of his pocket, in the
-presence of the other two gentlemen, he trembled, and appeared much
-affected, the tears flowing down his cheeks. Presenting the paper to Dr.
-Beyer, “Sir,” said he, “from this day the Lord has introduced you into
-the society of angels, and you are now surrounded by them.” They were all
-greatly affected. He then took his leave, and the next day embarked for
-England.
-
-Dr. Beyer sent immediately for Swedenborg’s writings, and soon became
-deeply engrossed in their study. In order to arrange their subjects more
-distinctly in his mind, he set about compiling an Index to them; which
-as he prepared it, he sent, sheet by sheet, to Amsterdam to be printed.
-He was thirteen years in compiling the work, and on the day he sent off
-the last sheet corrected, he sickened, took to his bed, and in a few days
-departed to the spiritual world.
-
-The result of Dr. Beyer’s study of Swedenborg’s writings, was a firm
-belief in their doctrines, and an open and enlightened advocacy of them,
-declaring in the public Consistory his full assent to them. As might
-naturally be expected, he suffered much obloquy and persecution for his
-adherence to the truth; but he was consoled in having the firm friendship
-of Swedenborg, and in being favored with receiving from him many letters,
-sympathizing with him in his trials, and answering many of his questions
-on doctrinal and psychological matters.
-
-Swedenborg did not make a long stay in England; but after a few weeks,
-or perhaps months, proceeded to Holland, spending the winter of 1765-66
-at Amsterdam. There, in the spring of 1766, he republished (it is
-supposed by the solicitation of friends,) his youthful work on a “New
-Method of Finding the Longitudes.” “This method,” as he informed the
-Swedish Archbishop, Menander, “of calculating the ephemerides by pairs of
-stars, several persons in foreign countries were then employing, who had
-experienced great advantage by the observations made according to it for
-a series of years.”
-
-From the time of the completion of the Arcana Cœlestia, in 1756,
-Swedenborg had been gradually composing an extensive work on the
-Apocalypse. The exposition was continued as far as the tenth verse of
-the nineteenth chapter, filling four large quarto volumes. He then
-laid the work aside—thinking, probably, that it was too voluminous and
-elaborate—and commenced anew, but on a considerably reduced scale. The
-former Exposition, a clearly written manuscript, ready for the printer,
-after sustaining a narrow escape from burning, (the house of a gentleman
-who had it for perusal having caught fire,) was published in the original
-Latin, in four quarto volumes, in 1790, eighteen years after the author’s
-death. It was translated into English and printed in six octavos, under
-the title of the Apocalypse Explained, in 1815. It is a most valuable
-work, and one that could not well be spared from the Swedenborg Library.
-Within its pages are several distinct treatises on very important
-subjects, which, if extracted, would form complete and excellent books
-of themselves. The exposition of the spiritual sense of the text is very
-copiously illustrated by parallel passages from other parts of the Word;
-and thus it must ever be a most useful work to the New Church preacher,
-as affording him a ready key to the internal sense of the Scriptures.
-
-The shorter exposition Swedenborg himself published at Amsterdam, in
-1766, under the title of the Apocalypse Revealed. As was his custom, he
-distributed copies of the work widely, sending it to the universities
-and superior clergy, and to many eminent persons in England, Holland,
-Germany, France, and Sweden.
-
-We will now make a few notes on some of the most remarkable features
-of Swedenborg’s exposition of that strange and mysterious book, the
-Apocalypse.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XX.
-
- _The Apocalypse Revealed._
-
-
-Every one who is acquainted with theological literature, knows that
-innumerable volumes of speculation have been written in attempted
-explanation of the Apocalypse. He is aware that expositors have
-differed about it from the earliest times; that Protestants have found
-Catholicism the subject of all its denunciations, and that Catholics
-have discovered that Paganism and Protestant heresy were in reality the
-matters alluded to; that sceptics have proved that it refers to none
-of these creeds, but is a worthless astrological treatise; and that
-many good Christians, vexed and wearied with this endless contest of
-opinion, have wished the book expunged from the canon of Scripture, as
-altogether incomprehensible, and a mere breeder of strife. And still the
-controversy goes on. The press swarms with volumes and pamphlets, all
-professing to have found the key to the mystery, informing the world of
-the future destiny of Europe, of the result of its wars and battles, the
-precise month of the fall of the Papacy, and the time of the descent of
-the New Jerusalem, the Second Advent, and the restoration of the Jews to
-Canaan, and, so far as the political arrangement of the kingdoms of the
-earth is concerned, almost superseding the necessity of newspapers to
-the credulous believer. Wise men generally now turn a deaf ear to these
-soothsayings, convinced by long and repeated experience of their utter
-futility, and thinking shrewdly enough that had the Divine Providence
-intended that man should know the future, the foreknowledge would have
-been communicated intelligibly and not through the medium of mysteries
-interpreted by men more conspicuous for temerity than for any endowment
-of wisdom or common sense above their fellows. “It is a part of this
-prophecy,” as Sir Isaac Newton remarks,—and the same principle is
-applicable to all prophecies,—“that it should not be understood before
-the last age of the world; and therefore it makes for the credit of
-the prophecy that it is not yet [about 1710] understood. The folly of
-interpreters has been, to foretell times and things by this prophecy, as
-if God designed to make them prophets. By this rashness, they have not
-only exposed themselves, but brought the prophecy also into contempt.
-The design of God was much otherwise. He gave this, and other prophecies
-of the Old Testament, not to gratify men’s curiosity by enabling them
-to foreknow things, but that, after they were fulfilled, they might be
-interpreted by the events; and his own Providence, not the interpreters,
-be then manifested thereby to the world. For the event of things,
-predicted many ages before, will then be a convincing argument that the
-world is governed by Providence. For, as the few and obscure prophecies
-concerning Christ’s first coming, were for setting up the Christian
-religion, _which all nations have since corrupted_; so the many and
-clear prophecies concerning the things to be done at Christ’s second
-coming, are not only for predicting but also for effecting a recovery and
-re-establishment of the long-lost truth, and setting up a kingdom wherein
-dwells righteousness. The event will prove the Apocalypse; and this
-prophecy, thus proved and understood, will open the old prophets; and all
-together will make known the true religion, and establish it.”
-
-With no claim to superior understanding or acuteness did Swedenborg
-present his exposition of this mysterious book to the world. He humbly
-declares that the mysteries of the Apocalypse are totally beyond the
-power of human intellect to unravel, and that whatever of truth is to be
-found in his work, owed its existence to the immediate illustration of
-his mind by the Lord. We shall presently show what powerful reason there
-was for this protestation on his part.
-
-The Apocalypse, we are taught, is a portion of the Divine Word. It
-was dictated directly by the Lord,—John, in Patmos, being simply an
-amanuensis.
-
-The Apocalypse is a prophetic book, descriptive of the decline and
-consummation of the Christian Church, and the establishment of the new
-and spiritual dispensation signified by “the New Jerusalem descending
-from God out of heaven.” Being a prophetic book, it would have been
-at variance with the laws of the Divine Providence for man to have
-understood its prophecies until after the events it described were past;
-for, as we have seen, a knowledge of the future would take from man all
-freedom of action, all inclination to labor, and the whole hope and
-pleasure of life. Therefore it was that the Apocalypse remained a sealed
-book until the Christian Church had reached its consummation, and the
-Last Judgment was effected, in 1757, when the Lord graciously opened
-the eyes of Swedenborg and manifested to him, in clear light, the deep
-mysteries of this prophecy.
-
-Wilkinson, in his admirable Biography, well says: “A volume, unless it
-were a reprint, would not give an analysis of the Apocalypse Revealed.
-When we say that the commentary takes the text word by word, and
-translates it into spirit, we still convey but a slender idea of what
-is done. Our own first impressions on reading the work will not soon be
-forgotten. Following the writer through the long breadths and flights of
-this vast empyrean, we were momently in anxious fear that to sustain a
-context of such was impossible. Each fresh chapter seemed like a space
-that mortal wing must not attempt; and yet the fear was groundless, for
-our guide sailed onward with a tranquil motion as if he knew the stars.
-History and common sense, panting and grasping science, philosophy in its
-better part, above all, the confidence in a Divine support and a supernal
-mission, appeared to be covertly and unexpectedly present, to annihilate
-difficulties, and pave the skyey way of this humble voyager. And when
-we had again alighted from that perusal which strained every faculty to
-the utmost, it was as though we had been there before, so entire was the
-impression of self-evidence that was left upon the mind. Genesis and the
-Revelation were closely at one in this marvellous Apocalypse—thenceforth
-the most open of the Bible pages: the two ends of the Scripture called to
-each other; an arch of Divine light spanned the river of the Word, and
-the original Eden blossomed anew in the midst of the street of the holy
-city.”
-
-The Rev. O. P. Hiller, in his Memoir of Swedenborg, writes: “In the
-Apocalypse Revealed, the mysterious book is taken up and examined chapter
-by chapter, verse by verse, word by word, in the same manner as was
-done with the books of Genesis and Exodus in the Arcana Cœlestia; and
-the interior meaning, the spiritual sense, of every part, set forth in
-such a manner as to present a clear, connected, and rational meaning
-throughout the whole book, from the first chapter to the last. And what
-is especially to be remarked, the spiritual sense of this book, the last
-of the New Testament, is shown to be founded on the same principles, and
-discovered by the same rules of interpretation, as the spiritual sense of
-the books of Genesis and Exodus, the first of the Old Testament, written,
-as they were, by other hands, and more than fifteen hundred years before;
-a strong proof, certainly, that however varied the human instruments
-there was One Divine Author of the whole. Thus, with any particular word,
-for instance, occurring in the book of Genesis, and declared to have a
-certain spiritual signification,—when that word occurs in the book of
-Revelation, it is shown to have the same signification; and this holds
-good in all cases. And, moreover, while all these various significations,
-taken together, make in the book of Genesis a complete spiritual sense,
-so in the book of Revelation they make their own complete spiritual
-sense. Now it will be readily seen, that such a coincidence would be
-altogether unaccountable, nay, impossible, unless there really existed
-such a spiritual sense in the Word of God: and it is, indeed, this
-uniform spiritual sense, full of high and heavenly truth, that raises
-the holy volume infinitely above all other works of history or morals;
-and the existence of such a sense is the strongest proof of the Divine
-character of those writings which we call the Sacred Scriptures. And
-truly, had Swedenborg done only this, he would have deserved the
-gratitude of all who seriously revere the Word of God, for thus bringing
-a new and most powerful argument from internal evidence, in favor of the
-inspiration and divinity of the sacred volume.”
-
-Well, then, might Swedenborg disclaim the authorship of the ideas in
-the Apocalypse Revealed, and ask: “What man can draw such things from
-himself?” Those who tell us that Swedenborg was self-deceived, must
-either know very little of what they speak about, or must be quite as
-ignorant of the capacity of the human mind and its powers of invention.
-For ourselves, we could as readily believe that Swedenborg created the
-world, as we could believe that the spiritual sense of the Apocalypse,
-and of the whole Word, was a fiction of his brain. Were the spiritual
-sense of the Word such a fiction, then it must be said that there lived
-a man in the last century, with an intellect and creative faculty,
-compared with which those of all the philosophers and poets of past
-and present time combined, were as nothing. We leave revilers of
-Swedenborg to make their choice; either to admit the existence of the
-spiritual sense of the Word; or, denying its existence, and pronouncing
-Swedenborg’s discovery either a delusion or an imposture, to admit that
-Swedenborg was a man wholly unique—a genius infinitely surpassing any
-which the world has ever known, and endowed with a power of invention
-which the mind of a nation incarnate in one man could never hope to rival.
-
-But it will never come to such a pass. Anyone who will take the trouble
-candidly to examine the subject, will become convinced of the spiritual
-sense of the Word, and of the truth of Swedenborg’s revelations regarding
-it. The denial and mockery of them can only coexist with an ignorance,
-more or less profound, of their nature; or, worse still, from a hatred
-of the truth, grounded in the life and love of evil. The spiritual sense
-of the Word is no invention. It is a discovery,—accomplished by Divine
-means, however,—just as the finding of Australia was a discovery; and we
-shall believe in its existence if we become _practically_ acquainted with
-it through reverent thought and study; even as We should know Australia
-best, did we go there.
-
-It may be said: “Well, suppose the spiritual sense of the Apocalypse does
-describe the fall of the Christian Church, and the inauguration of the
-New Church; and typifies the doctrine of justification by faith alone by
-the Dragon; and the Romanists and their lust of dominion and atrocious
-deeds by Babylon and the great Harlot sitting upon many waters; what
-then? It is true such descriptions must ever have a certain interest,
-but not sufficient to render them subjects of universal study in all
-ages, and worthily forming a part of that Divine Book which is read by
-angels in heaven, as well as by men on earth.” The objection is a sound
-one so far as it goes, but it is made in ignorance of a great but very
-simple truth, namely, that all that is true of a church is true of an
-individual. The trust in mere truth in the intellect, and the lust of
-power and glory,—the former signified by the Dragon, and the latter by
-Babylon,—are evils which exist in all minds to a greater or less degree;
-and the Divine description of their nature and awful consequences may be
-thought of apart from any idea of Geneva or Rome. The Apocalypse being a
-divine work, has infinite applications, and will be read to eternity in
-spheres where the names of Romanist and Protestant are unknown; and in
-societies of glorified spirits, compared with whose number and influence
-this world is insignificant.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXI.
-
- _Travels—Habits—Anecdotes._
-
-
-In April, 1766, Swedenborg again visited England in order to observe the
-effect of his writings upon the English people. Of this visit we have no
-account, except in reference to its conclusion, in September of the same
-year, when he returned to Stockholm. Mr. Springer, the Swedish Consul in
-London, an old friend of Swedenborg’s, has left the following interesting
-record of some incidents connected with his return.
-
-“Swedenborg was about to depart for Sweden, and desired me to procure him
-a good captain, which I did. I made the agreement with a person named
-Dixon. Swedenborg’s effects were carried on board the vessel, and as his
-apartments were at some distance from the port, we took, for that night,
-a chamber at an inn near it, because the captain of the vessel was to
-come and fetch him in the morning. Swedenborg went to bed; and I went
-to sit in another room, with the master of the house, with whom I was
-conversing. We both heard a remarkable noise, and could not apprehend
-what it could be, and therefore drew near to a door, where there was a
-little window that looked into the chamber where Swedenborg lay. We saw
-him with his arms raised toward heaven, and his body appeared to tremble.
-He spoke much for the space of half an hour, but we could understand
-nothing of what he said, except that when he let his hands fall down, we
-heard him say with a loud voice, ‘My God!’ But we could not hear what he
-said more. He remained afterwards very quietly in his bed. I entered into
-his chamber with the master of the house, and asked him if he was ill.
-‘No,’ said he; ‘but I have had a long discourse with some of the heavenly
-friends, and am at this time in a great perspiration.’ And as his effects
-were embarked on board the vessel, he asked the master of the house to
-let him have a shirt; he then went again to bed, and slept till morning.
-
-“When the captain of the vessel came to fetch Swedenborg, I took my leave
-of him, and wished him a happy voyage. I then asked the captain if he
-was provided with good and necessary provisions. He answered me, that
-he had as much as was needful for the voyage. On this, Swedenborg said:
-‘My friend, we shall not need a great quantity: for this day week we
-shall, by the aid of God, enter the port of Stockholm at two o’clock.’
-It happened exactly as he foretold, as Dixon informed me; saying, that a
-violent gale accelerated the voyage, that the wind was favorable at every
-turn of the vessel, and that he never in all his life had so prosperous a
-voyage.”
-
-Arriving at Stockholm on the 8th of September, Swedenborg resided in
-the Sudermalm, the southern suburb of the city. Robsahm tells us: “His
-house was built and arranged after his own taste; the apartments were
-rather small, but suitable for himself. Although he was a man of most
-profound learning, no other books were seen in his study than the Hebrew
-and Greek Bible, together with his own indexes to his works, whereby he
-saved himself the trouble, when referring to different passages, of going
-through all he had before written.
-
-“Adjoining the house was a rather large garden, in the midst of which he
-had a summer-house, or pavilion. There were four doors to the apartment,
-which formed a square, and was occasionally turned, in an instant, into
-an octagon, by means of four other doors that belonged to it. One of
-these doors shut with a secret lock, which being opened, there appeared
-a glass door placed opposite a fine green hedge, where a bird was seen
-in a cage. This new spectacle produced an agreeable surprise of a second
-garden to the person who opened the door, which Swedenborg used to say
-was more agreeable than the first. At the entrance of the garden there
-was a parterre, well covered with flowers, which he was very fond of. He
-derived no other advantage from the garden, for he gave the whole produce
-of it to the gardener who waited on him; so also that of a very excellent
-greenhouse, in which he took much pleasure.
-
-“The gardener and his wife were the only servants he had; of the latter
-he never desired other service than that of making his bed, and of
-bringing water into his apartment. He generally made his own coffee on
-the fire in his study, and took much of it, well sweetened. When at home,
-his dinner consisted of a small loaf put into boiled milk, and at that
-time he neither drank wine nor any spirituous liquor, nor did he take any
-supper. Though he was very sparing in his eating and drinking, yet he
-would sometimes, when in company, take a glass of wine, but was always in
-one equal temper of mind, and cheerful.
-
-“He had a fire constantly kept up in his study, from autumn, throughout
-the winter, until spring; but his bedroom, contrary to the usual custom
-in Sweden, was always cold; and according as the cold was more or less
-severe, he made use of three, or four, blankets. When he awoke, he went
-into his study, where there were always live coals, on which he laid
-wood, with birch-bark, having a number of small bundles ready for use,
-and to make a quick fire before he sat down to write.
-
-“In his parlor was a table of black marble, on which, one would have
-supposed, at first sight, that a hand of cards had been carelessly
-thrown, the imitation being so perfect. He made a present of this table
-to the Royal College of Mines, who preserve it with great care. This room
-was neat and genteel, but furnished in a plain style.
-
-“His wardrobe was simple, yet suitable to the season. He wore in winter a
-fur gown; and when at home, in summer, a morning robe.
-
-“He spoke very distinctly. When he began to talk in company, every one
-was silent, as well from the pleasure they had in hearing his discourse,
-as from a sense of his well known great erudition, which he did not
-show but on occasions in which he found himself compelled to prove his
-assertions, or the little weight of the arguments of some with whom he
-conversed. Besides the learned languages, in which he was well versed, he
-understood the French, English, Dutch, German, and Italian.”
-
-We are thankful indeed for these details, trifling though they are. They
-evince the quiet practical character of Swedenborg, and the strong common
-sense which guarded him from all extravagance and eccentricity.
-
-From the gardener’s wife, Robsahm received the following
-statement:—“Entering one day, after dinner, into Swedenborg’s chamber, I
-saw his eyes like unto a most bright flame. I drew back, saying, ‘In the
-name of goodness, Sir, what has happened extraordinary to you? for you
-have a very peculiar appearance.’ ‘What kind of look have I?’ answered
-he. I then told him what struck me. ‘Well, well,’ replied he, which was
-his favorite expression, ‘don’t be frightened, the Lord has so disposed
-my eyes, that by them spirits may see what is in our world.’” In a short
-time this appearance passed away, as he said it would. “I know,” said she
-to Robsahm, “when he has conversed with heavenly spirits, for there is a
-pleasure and calm satisfaction in his countenance, which charm those who
-see it; but after he has conversed with evil spirits, he has a sorrowful
-look.”
-
-Concerning his temptations, they said that their master, in the night,
-often spoke aloud, when evil spirits were with him, which they could
-easily hear, their room being adjoining. When asked what caused his
-disturbance in the night, he answered that it had been permitted the evil
-spirits to blaspheme, and that he had spoken against them zealously. It
-happened often that, weeping bitterly, he cried with a loud voice, and
-prayed to the Lord that he might not be forsaken in his temptation, when
-they assailed him. His words were, ‘Lord help me! Lord, my God, do not
-forsake me!’ Those who saw him in these states, supposed he was sick; but
-when delivered from them, he returned thanks to God, and said to those
-who were troubled for him, ‘God be eternally praised! Comfort yourselves,
-my friends, all has passed away; and be assured that nothing happens to
-me but what the Lord permits, who never lays a burden on us more weighty
-than we are able to bear.’
-
-Once it was remarkable that after such a state he went to bed, and did
-not rise for several days and nights. This gave his domestics much
-uneasiness, and they consulted together, and supposed he was dead. They
-intended to break open the door, or to call their neighbors. At last the
-gardener went to the window, and discovered, to his great joy, that his
-master was alive, and turning in his bed. The next day he rang the bell.
-The woman went in, and related her own and her husband’s uneasiness for
-him. He told her with a cheerful countenance, that he had been very well,
-and had wanted nothing.
-
-The following anecdote, narrated to Robsahm by the gardener’s wife,
-places Swedenborg’s moral courage in a strong light, and shows the use of
-judicious plain speaking. Bishop Halenius, the successor of Swedenborg’s
-father, paying Swedenborg a visit one day, the conversation turned on
-the nature of common sermons. Swedenborg said to the bishop, “You insert
-things that are false in yours;” on this, the bishop told the gardener,
-who was present, to retire, but Swedenborg commanded him to stay. The
-conversation went on, and both turned over the Hebrew and Greek Bibles,
-to show the texts that were agreeable to their assertions. At length
-the interview ended, by some observations intended as reproaches to the
-bishop on his avarice and various unjust actions; “You have already
-prepared yourself a place in hell,” said Swedenborg: “but,” added he,
-“I predict that some months hence you will be attacked with a grievous
-illness, during which time the Lord will seek to convert you. If you
-then open your heart to his holy inspirations, your conversion will take
-place. When this happens, write to me for my theological works, and I
-will send them to you.” Some months after, an officer from the province
-and bishopric of Skara visited Swedenborg. On being asked how bishop
-Halenius was, he replied: “He has been very ill, but at present he is
-quite recovered, and has become altogether another person, being now a
-practicer of what is good, full of probity, and returns sometimes three
-or four-fold of the property which he had before unjustly taken into his
-possession.” From that time to the hour of his death, he was one of the
-greatest supporters of the doctrine of the New Church of the Lord, and
-declared openly, that the theological writings of Swedenborg were the
-most precious treasures given for the welfare of mankind. What a blessed
-result was this of the few severe but really kind words of Swedenborg,
-spoken in season!
-
-In Stockholm, Swedenborg was very accessible, and visitors sought his
-advice for all purposes. Widows went to him to inquire about the state
-of their husbands in the other world; and others fancying him a wizard,
-beset him with questions about lost and stolen property. Notwithstanding
-the number and frequency of these visits, from people of all ranks, he
-would never receive any particular ones, and more especially those of
-females, without one of his domestics being present. He also required his
-visitors to speak in the language of the country, saying, “I will have
-witnesses of my discourse and conduct, that all pretensions to malicious
-assertions and scandal may be taken away.” He had probably suffered from
-the tongues of busybodies: it would have been strange if he had not;
-and it was prudent for him to take this effectual plan to cut away the
-foundation of all idle and malicious gossip.
-
-Nicholas Collin, a young clergyman, at this time visited Swedenborg, and
-thus pleasantly narrates his interview. “In 1765, I went to reside at
-Stockholm, where I continued for nearly three years. During that time,
-Swedenborg was a great object of public attention in the metropolis,
-and his extraordinary character was a frequent topic of discussion. He
-resided at his house in the southern suburbs, which was in a pleasant
-situation, neat and convenient, with a spacious garden and other
-appendages. There he received company. Not seldom he also appeared in
-company, and mixed in private society; sufficient opportunities were
-therefore given to observe him. I collected much information from several
-respectable persons who had conversed with him; which was the more
-easy, as I lived the whole time as a private tutor in the family of Dr.
-Celsius, a gentleman of distinguished talents, who afterwards became
-bishop of Scania. He, and many of the eminent persons that frequented his
-house, knew Swedenborg well.
-
-“In the summer of 1766, I waited on him at his house. Introducing myself
-with an apology for the freedom I took, I assured him that it was not
-in the least from youthful presumption. I was then twenty, but had a
-strong desire to converse with a character so celebrated. He received
-me very kindly. It being early in the afternoon, delicate coffee,
-without eatables, was served, agreeable to the Swedish custom; he was
-also, like pensive men in general, fond of this beverage. We conversed
-for nearly three hours; principally on the nature of human souls, and
-their states in the invisible world; discussing the principal theories
-of psychology by various authors. He asserted positively, as he often
-does in his works, that he had intercourse with spirits of deceased
-persons. I presumed, therefore, to request of him, as a great favor,
-to procure me an interview with my brother, who had departed this life
-a few months before, a young clergyman, and esteemed for his devotion,
-erudition, and virtue. He answered, that God, having for good and wise
-purposes separated the world of spirits from ours, a communication is
-never granted without cogent reasons; and asked what my motives were. I
-confessed that I had none besides gratifying brotherly affection, and an
-ardent wish to explore scenes so sublime and interesting to a serious
-mind. He replied, that my motives were good, but not sufficient; but that
-if any important spiritual or temporal concern of mine had been the case,
-he would then have solicited permission from those angels who regulate
-these matters. He showed me his garden. It had an agreeable building,
-a wing of which was a kind of temple, to which he often retired for
-contemplation; its dim religious light rendering it suitable for such a
-purpose.
-
-“We parted with mutual satisfaction; and he presented by me, to the said
-Dr. Celsius, an elegant copy of his Apocalypsis Revelata, then lately
-printed in Amsterdam.”
-
-Swedenborg was of a very mild temper, upright, just, and incapable of
-perverting the truth. Robsahm, one day, asked him if a certain preacher,
-lately deceased, and greatly esteemed in Stockholm for his flowery
-sermons, had a place in heaven. “No,” said Swedenborg, “he went directly
-into the abyss; for he left his devotion in the pulpit: he was not pious,
-but a hypocrite; proud and greatly vain of the gifts he had received
-from nature, and the goods of fortune he was continually seeking to
-acquire. Truly,” continued he, “false appearances will stand us in no
-stead hereafter; they are all separated from man at his decease; the mask
-then falls from him; and it is then made manifest to all, whether he is
-inwardly good or evil.”
-
-The exact month of Swedenborg’s next foreign travel is uncertain; but
-just before he undertook it, Robsahm met him in his carriage, and asked
-him how he could venture to take a voyage to London, at the age of
-eighty, and expressed a fear lest he should not see him again. “Be not
-uneasy, my friend,” said he, “if you live, we shall see one another
-again, for I have yet another voyage of this kind to make.”
-
-At Elsinore, on these voyages, he frequently visited M. Rahling, the
-Swedish Consul, and during this transit, he made the acquaintance of
-General Tuxen, at the Consul’s table. The General asked him how a
-man might be certain whether he was on the road to salvation or not.
-Swedenborg answered, “That is very easy. A man need only examine himself
-and his thoughts by the Ten Commandments; as, for instance, whether he
-loves and fears God; whether he is happy in seeing the welfare of others,
-and does not envy them; whether on having received a great injury from
-others, which may have excited him to anger and to meditate revenge, he
-afterwards changes his sentiments, because God has said that vengeance
-is His, and so on; then he may rest assured that he is on the road to
-heaven: but when he discovers himself actuated by contrary sentiments, he
-may know that he is on the road to hell.”
-
-This led Tuxen to think of himself, as well as others; and he asked
-Swedenborg whether he had seen King Frederick V. of Denmark, deceased
-in 1766, adding that though some human frailty attached to him, yet he
-had certain hopes that he was happy. Swedenborg said, “Yes, I have seen
-him, and he is well off; and not only he, but all the kings of the house
-of Oldenburg, who are associated together. This is not the happy case
-with our Swedish kings.” Swedenborg then told him that he had seen no
-one so splendidly ministered to in the world of spirits as the Empress
-Elizabeth of Russia, who died in 1762. As Tuxen expressed astonishment at
-this, Swedenborg continued: “I can also tell you the reason, which few
-would surmise. With all her faults, she had a good heart, and a certain
-consideration in her negligence. This induced her to put off signing many
-papers that were from time to time presented to her, and which at last so
-accumulated that she could not examine them, but was obliged to sign as
-many as possible on the representation of her ministers; after which she
-would retire to her closet, fall on her knees, and beg God’s forgiveness,
-if she, against her will, had signed anything that was wrong.”
-
-At the conclusion of this interesting interview, Swedenborg went on board
-his vessel, leaving a firm friend and future disciple in General Tuxen.
-Some years after, Tuxen wrote: “I thank our Lord, the God of heaven, that
-I have been acquainted with this great man and his writings. I esteem
-this as the greatest blessing I ever experienced in this life, and hope I
-shall profit by it in working out my salvation.”
-
-Swedenborg’s stay in London at this time must have been brief; for on the
-28th of November, 1768, we meet him again in Amsterdam, whither he had
-gone to print another important work, “Conjugial Love, and its chaste
-Delights; also Adulterous Love and its insane Pleasures.” This book he
-published with his name, as written “by Emanuel Swedenborg, a Swede.”
-This is the first of his theological works to which he affixed his name.
-His reason for giving it in this instance, is said to have been, that no
-other person might be censured for writing on this delicate subject. We
-will now examine the contents of this wondrous book.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXII.
-
- _Conjugial Love._
-
-
-A wise man might well suspect the soundness of any system of morals
-which did not take into careful consideration the conjugial relation.
-Marriage—the most important event in life, the relation which occupies
-the whole thought of one sex, and the most serious regards of the other,
-the institution around which all that is highest find holiest in life
-groups itself, family, home, all that human hearts hold dear—must ever
-hold a prominent place in a true code of moral and spiritual laws. How
-then could the subject be omitted from the heavenly writings of the New
-Jerusalem? or how could its apostle forget or pass it by.
-
-Swedenborg, in his treatise on Conjugial Love, first speaks of marriages
-in heaven. He shows that a man lives a man after death, and that a woman
-lives a woman; and since it was ordained from creation that the woman
-should be for the man, and the man for the woman, and thus that each
-should be the other’s,—and since that love is innate in both, it follows
-that there are marriages in heaven as well as on earth.
-
-Marriage in the heavens is the conjunction of two into one mind. The mind
-of man consists of two parts, the understanding and the will. When these
-two parts act in unity, they are called one mind. The understanding is
-predominant in man, and the will in woman; but in the marriage of minds
-there is no predominance, for the will of the wife becomes also the
-will of the husband, and the understanding of the husband is also that
-of the wife; because each loves to will and to think as the other wills
-and thinks, and thus they will and think mutually and reciprocally. Hence
-their conjunction; so that in heaven, two married partners are not called
-two, but one angel. When this conjunction of minds descends into the
-inferior principles which are of the body, it is perceived and felt as
-love, and that love is conjugial love.
-
-To this doctrine of marriage in heaven will arise an objection from the
-Lord’s words to the Sadducees, when they asked Him whose wife, in the
-resurrection, a woman should be, who had been married in succession to
-seven brethren. The Lord replied: “The children of this world marry, and
-are given in marriage; but they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain
-that world and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are
-given in marriage.”—Luke xx. 34, 35. To understand this reply, we must
-bear in mind the nature of the question. A woman had been married, quite
-in accordance with worldly usage, to seven husbands. Of course, nothing
-of this kind takes place in heaven; for, as the Lord says, there “neither
-can they die any more.” After that fashion indeed there is no marrying or
-giving in marriage in heaven. In truth, marriages, such as they are in
-heaven, could never have been comprehended by the gross and carnal-minded
-Jews; and had the Lord entered into detail, He would have been as grossly
-misapprehended by them as when He said, “Destroy this temple, and in
-three days I will raise it up.” And they said: “Forty and six years was
-this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?” not
-knowing that he “spake of the temple of his body.” John ii. 19-21. Now
-Swedenborg very plainly shows that Christians think as naturally of
-marriage as the Jews did of the temple, if they suppose that the true
-marriage of minds does not take place in heaven, or that it was any but
-the carnal and sensual connections of earth that the Lord declared had
-no place in eternity. In the spiritual sense of the Lord’s words, by
-the marriage that does not take place in heaven, is meant the spiritual
-marriage, or union of goodness and truth in the mind; in other words,
-regeneration: this must be accomplished in this life, or not at all.
-When the spiritual sense of the Word is understood, this interpretation
-becomes manifest as the only true and rational mode of understanding the
-text; and all the rest of Scripture goes to confirm it.
-
-Moreover it is true that there is no marriage in heaven in the exact
-sense of the word. Partners are born into this world, and by life in
-it are disciplined for each other. Separate, they are but parts of one
-whole; and in each there is a continual longing for unition. Seen by
-the eye of Omniscience, they are ever married; they are one, however
-divided they may be by space or circumstances. Their meeting in heaven
-and recognition of each other is only the external completion of what had
-before in essentials been effected. And in this sense it may be said that
-there are no marriages in heaven; for all are married, in reality, before
-they reach heaven.
-
-Marriages on earth, Swedenborg teaches, are at this day entered upon
-so generally from merely worldly and sensual motives, and with so
-little regard for similarity of mind, that, save in few cases, they
-are not maintained and perpetuated in the other life. Married partners
-commonly meet after death; but as their internal differences of mind are
-manifested, they separate; for no married partners can be received into
-heaven, except such as have been interiorly united, or are capable of
-being so united into one; which is understood by the Lord’s words: “They
-are no longer two, but one flesh.” Such as are thus separated—possibly
-both very good people—meet, in due time, congenial partners, whose souls
-incline to union with their own, so that they no longer wish to be two
-lives, but one.
-
-The meeting of young partners in heaven is thus charmingly
-described:—“The divine providence of the Lord extends to everything,
-even to the minutest particulars concerning marriages, because all the
-delights of heaven spring from the delights of conjugial love, as sweet
-waters from the fountain head. On this account it is provided that
-conjugial pairs be born, and these pairs are continually educated to
-their several marriages under the Lord’s auspices, neither the boy nor
-the girl knowing anything of the matter; and after a stated time, when
-both of them become marriageable, they meet in some place as by chance,
-and see each other, and in this case they instantly know, as by a kind
-of instinct, that they are pairs; and by a kind of inward dictate, think
-within themselves—the youth that she is mine, and the virgin that he is
-mine; and when this thought has existed some time in the mind of each,
-they accost each other from a deliberate purpose, and betroth themselves.
-It is said as by chance, by instinct, and by dictate, and the meaning is
-by Divine Providence: since, while the Divine Providence is unknown, it
-has such an appearance; for the Lord opens internal similitudes, that
-they may see each other.”
-
-We are now led by Swedenborg, and introduced to a knowledge of the nature
-of conjugial love, and shown in what consists its essential blessedness.
-He shows that this love originates in the marriage of goodness and
-truth. Every one who has experienced anything of regeneration, knows
-that there is no bliss so intense, no joy so extatic, as that arising
-from well-doing, and submission to the will of the Lord. When right is
-done because it is right, when truth in the understanding is carried
-into action, then good is inseminated in the will by the Lord, and
-conjoining itself to truth in the understanding, the soul overflows with
-the sweetest peace, and the most interior delight. The conjunction of
-goodness and truth is the heavenly marriage, to which the Lord compares
-the kingdom of heaven; and He says that it is not here, nor there, but
-within us. Under the symbols of marriage and love, the regeneration of
-the soul is continually described in the Word; and the meeting of Jacob
-and Rachel at the well, when “Jacob kissed Rachel,” and for very joy,
-“lifted up his voice and wept,” beautifully typifies the meeting of
-goodness and truth, and the gladness resulting from their approaching
-union.
-
-It was said that in man the understanding predominates, and in woman
-the will. In the mind of each, then, it is evident, there never can
-be a perfect marriage, seeing that individual minds are in themselves
-imperfect, the balance of the will and intellect being in no case
-equal. The mental perfection or _wholeness_ of man then necessitates
-marriage. Truth loves good, and good loves truth; and so the will and
-the understanding ever long for conjunction. It is plain, then, that
-in man there must always be an unsatisfied desire, if he remain by
-himself; and so, also, to even a greater degree, with the woman. This
-insatiable desire for conjunction of soul, can not well appear in its
-strength in this life for many reasons; nor can it receive here its full
-satisfaction, as it will in eternity.
-
-True conjugial love can exist only between two; and in polygamists and
-adulterers it is utterly destroyed. Again, it can only exist with the
-regenerate, with those who love the Lord and their neighbor, and delight
-in keeping the divine commandments. In proportion as married partners so
-live, they become more and more closely and interiorly conjoined; and
-their minds flowing into one, their peace, joy, and bliss are ineffably
-increased. With the wicked there is no conjugial love. Their life, being
-internally evil, conceals the deepest hatred; and the apparent affection
-which they may display in the world, arises either from sensual love, or
-worldly expediency. Be it well noted by all, that marriage can yield real
-happiness only to the religious—to those who love God and honor His laws.
-
-It is impossible for us to give, even by way of catalogue, a view of
-the details into which the treatise on Conjugial Love enters. It is so
-richly studded with great principles, that no condensation is possible.
-It is thus with all of Swedenborg’s books; so that an exhaustive review
-is impossible. He never treats his readers to long moralizings that can
-be condensed into one paragraph; but all his writings are crowded with
-thought, so that one is prompted not to condensation, but to expansion.
-This excuse, which we have had to present on previous occasions, must
-form our apology for the following extracts, selected as illustrations of
-some of the leading truths in this treatise.
-
-_The Delights of Conjugial Love._—“As conjugial love is the foundation
-love of all good loves, and as it is inscribed on all the parts and
-principles of man, even to the most particular, it follows that its
-delights exceed the delights of all other loves, and also that it gives
-delight to the other loves, according to its presence and conjunction
-with them; for it expands the inmost principles of the mind, and at the
-same time the inmost principles of the body, as the most delightful
-current of its fountain flows through and opens them. The reason why all
-delights, from first to last, are collated into this love, is on account
-of the superior excellence of its use, which is the propagation of the
-human race, and thence of the angelic heaven; and as this use was the
-chief end of creation, it follows that all the beatitudes, satisfactions,
-delights, pleasantnesses, and pleasures, which the Lord the Creator
-could possibly confer upon man, are collated into this love.”—n. 68.
-
-_Love truly Conjugial is essential Chastity._—“The reasons are, 1.
-Because it is from the Lord, and corresponds to the marriage of the Lord
-and the church. 2. Because it descends from the marriage of good and
-truth. 3. Because it is spiritual, in proportion as the church exists
-with man. 4. Because it is the foundation love, and head of all celestial
-and spiritual loves. 5. Because it is the orderly seminary of the human
-race, and thereby of the angelic heaven. 6. Because on this account it
-also exists with the angels of heaven, and gives birth with them to
-spiritual offspring, which are love and wisdom. 7. And because its uses
-are thus more excellent than the other uses of creation. From these
-considerations, it follows that love truly conjugial, viewed from its
-origin and its essence, is pure and holy, so that it may be called purity
-and holiness, consequently, essential chastity.”—n. 143.
-
-_Conjugial Love in Ancient Times._—“I have been informed by the angels,
-that those who lived in the most ancient times, live at this day in the
-heavens, in separate houses, families, and nations, as they lived on
-earth, _and that scarce any one of a house is wanting_; and that the
-reason is, because they were principled in love truly conjugial; and that
-hence their children inherited inclinations to the conjugial principles
-of good and truth, and were easily initiated into it more and more
-interiorly by education received from their parents, and afterwards as
-from themselves, when they became capable of judging for themselves, were
-introduced into it by the Lord.”—n. 205.
-
-_Marriage elevates Humanity to its Highest Form._—“The most perfect and
-noble human form results from the conjunction of two forms, by marriage,
-so as to become one form; thus from two fleshes becoming one flesh
-according to creation. In such a case the man’s mind is elevated into
-superior light, and the wife’s into superior heat.”—n. 201.
-
-_The Children of Good Parents._—“Children born of parents who are
-principled in love truly conjugial, derive from their parents the
-conjugial principle of good and truth, by virtue whereof they have an
-inclination and faculty, if sons, to perceive the things appertaining
-to wisdom, and if daughters, to love those things which wisdom teaches.
-Hence a superior suitableness and facility to grow wise, is inherited by
-those who are born from such a marriage, and also to imbibe the things
-relating to the church and heaven.”—n. 202-4.
-
-The capacity of women to perform the duties of men, and men those of
-women, is thus spoken of.
-
-“The wife can not enter into the duties proper to the man, nor on the
-other hand the man into the duties proper to the wife, because they
-differ like wisdom and the love thereof, or like understanding and the
-will thereof. In the duties proper to the man, the primary agent is
-the understanding, thought, and wisdom; whereas in the duties proper
-to the wife, the primary agent is will, affection, and love; and the
-wife from the latter principles performs her duties, and the man from
-the former performs his; wherefore their duties, from the nature of
-them, are diverse, but still conjunctive in a successive series. It
-is believed by many that women can perform the duties of men, if they
-were initiated therein like boys, at an early age. They may indeed be
-initiated into the exercise of such duties, but not into the judgment, on
-which the rectitude interiorly depends; wherefore those women who have
-been initiated into the duties of men, are bound, in matters of judgment,
-to consult men, and then, if they are left to their own disposal, they
-select from the counsels of men what favors their own particular love.
-It is also supposed by some, that women are equally capable with men
-of elevating the intellectual vision, and into the same sphere of life,
-and of viewing things in the same altitude; and they have been led
-into this opinion by the writings of certain learned authoresses; but
-these writings, when examined in the spiritual world, in the presence
-of the authoresses, were found to be the productions, not of judgment
-and wisdom, but of ingenuity and wit; and what proceeds from these two
-latter principles, on account of the elegance and neatness of style in
-which it is written, has the appearance of sublimity and erudition; yet
-only in the eyes of those who call all ingenuity by the name of wisdom.
-In like manner, men can not enter into the duties of women, and perform
-them aright, because they are not in the affections of women, which are
-altogether distinct from the affections of men. As the affections and
-perceptions of the male and female sex are thus distinct by creation,
-and consequently by nature, therefore, among the statutes given to the
-sons of Israel, this was also ordained: ‘A woman shall not put on the
-garment of a man, neither shall a man put on the garment of a woman;
-because this is an abomination.’ Deut. xxii. 5. The reason is, because
-all in the spiritual world are clothed according to their affections;
-and the affections of the woman and the man can not be united, except as
-subsisting between two, and in no case as subsisting in one.”—n. 175.
-
-The latter portion of the treatise on Conjugial Love is devoted to the
-melancholy subject of the disorders of the married life, to coldnesses
-and quarrels, separations and divorces; and finally to adulteries,
-fornications, and all the abuses of the sexual relations. Of this it
-would be out of place to speak here, except to remark, that it follows,
-as a consequence of the fact that conjugial love makes man’s highest
-bliss and purest heaven, that its violations and abuses must needs lead
-to the bitterest misery and deepest hell. This portion of the treatise
-has subjected Swedenborg to some gross calumny, which, if sincere, could
-only have arisen from a very superficial acquaintance with the principles
-of its author. And yet it is hardly possible for a man to write on such
-subjects, without provoking the censure of the sickly virtuous and the
-hypocritically pure. Religious people too generally treat the dire
-sexual evils which infest and corrupt society with silence and aversion;
-passing them by as the priest and the Levite did the wounded traveler.
-When the spirit of Jesus more fully actuates the church, and the love of
-the neighbor prompts to heal the world’s evils by all efficient means,
-then, we have no doubt, Swedenborg on Scortatory Love will be taken into
-council.
-
-We have used the term “conjugial,” after Swedenborg, who generally uses
-the Latin adjective _conjugialis_, in preference to _conjugalis_, perhaps
-because softer in sound.
-
-Interspersed between the various chapters of the treatise, are memorable
-relations of scenes which the author beheld in the spiritual world, and
-conversations which he had with spirits and angels on the subject of
-conjugial love. Many of these possess the most fascinating interest,
-and convey at the same time the most profound and beautiful truths.
-One interview which he had with two angels of the third heaven is so
-beautiful that we present it at length.
-
-“One morning I was looking upwards into heaven, and I saw over me three
-expanses, one above another. I wondered at first what all this meant; and
-presently there was heard from heaven a voice as of a trumpet, saying,
-‘We have perceived, and now see, that thou art meditating concerning
-conjugial love. We are aware that no one on earth at present knows what
-true conjugial love is in its origin and essence. Yet it is of importance
-that it should be known. With us in the heavens, especially in the third
-heaven, our heavenly delights are principally derived from conjugial
-love; wherefore in consequence of leave granted us, we will send down
-to thee a conjugial pair for thy inspection and observation:’ and lo!
-instantly there appeared a chariot descending from the third or highest
-heaven; in which there was seen one angel; but as it approached there
-were seen therein two. The chariot, at a distance, glittered before my
-eyes like a diamond, and to it were harnessed young horses white as
-snow; and those who sat in the chariot held in their hands two turtle
-doves.... When they came nearer, lo! it was a husband and his wife; and
-they said, ‘We are a conjugial pair; we have lived blessed in heaven
-from the first age of the world, which is called by you the golden age,
-and during that time in the same perpetual flower of youth in which thou
-seest us at this day. I viewed each attentively, because I perceived that
-they represented conjugial love in its life and its adorning; in its life
-in their faces, and in its adorning in their raiment.... The husband
-appeared of a middle age between manhood and youth; from his eyes darted
-forth sparkling light derived from the wisdom of love; by virtue of which
-light his face was radiant from its inmost ground; and in consequence
-of such radiance, the skin had a kind of refulgence in the outermost
-surface, whereby his whole face was one resplendent comeliness. He was
-dressed in an upper robe which reached down to his feet, and underneath
-it was a vesture of hyacinthine blue, girded about with a golden girdle,
-upon which were three precious stones, two sapphires on the sides, and
-a carbuncle in the middle; his stockings were of bright shining linen,
-with threads of silver interwoven; and his shoes were of velvet: such
-was the representative form of conjugial love with the husband. But with
-the wife it was this; her face was seen by me, and it was not seen; it
-was seen as essential beauty, and it was not seen because this beauty
-was inexpressible; for in her face there was a splendor of flaming
-light, such as the angels of the third heaven enjoy, and this light made
-my sight dim; so that I was lost in astonishment: she, observing this,
-addressed me, saying, ‘What dost thou see?’ I replied, ‘I see nothing
-but conjugial love and the form thereof; but I see, and I do not see.’
-Hereupon she turned herself obliquely from her husband; and then I was
-enabled to view her attentively. Her eyes were bright and sparkling from
-the light of her own heaven, which light, as was said, is of a flaming
-quality, which it derives from the love of wisdom; for in that heaven
-wives love their husbands from their wisdom and in their wisdom: and
-husbands love their wives from that love of wisdom and in it, as directed
-towards themselves; and thus they are united. This was the origin of her
-beauty; which was such that it would be impossible for any painter to
-imitate and exhibit it in its form, for he has no colors bright and vivid
-enough to express its lustre; nor is it in the power of his art to depict
-such beauty. Her hair was adjusted in becoming order so as to correspond
-with her beauty; and in it were inserted diadems of flowers: she had a
-necklace of carbuncles, from which hung a rosary of chrysolites; and she
-had bracelets of pearl: her upper robe was scarlet, and underneath it
-was a stomacher of purple, fastened in front with clasps of rubies. But
-what surprised me was, that the colors varied according to her aspect in
-regard to her husband, and also according thereto were sometimes more
-glittering, and sometimes less; in mutual aspect more, and in oblique
-aspect less. When I had made these observations, they again discoursed
-with me; and when the husband spoke, he spoke at the same time as from
-his wife; and when the wife spoke, she spoke at the same time as from her
-husband; such was the union of their minds from whence speech flows; and
-on this occasion I also heard the sound or tone of voice of conjugial
-love; inwardly it was simultaneous, and it likewise proceeded from the
-delights of a state of innocence and peace. At length they said, ‘We are
-recalled; we must depart:’ and instantly they appeared again conveyed
-in a chariot as before. The way by which they were conveyed was a paved
-way through flowering shrubberies, from the beds of which rose olive and
-orange trees laden with fruit. When they approached their own heaven they
-were met by several virgins, who welcomed and introduced them.”
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXIII.
-
- _Attacked by Dr. Ekebom—Visits France—Letter to Hartley, and
- Hartley’s Opinion of Swedenborg._
-
-
-In the spring of 1769, Swedenborg published at Amsterdam, A Brief
-Exposition of the Doctrine of the New Church, “in which work,” he says,
-writing to Dr. Beyer, “are fully shown the errors of the existing
-doctrines of justification by faith alone, and of the imputation of the
-righteousness or merits of Jesus Christ.” He sent the little book to all
-the clergy throughout Holland, and to the most eminent in Germany; but,
-on second thought, sent only one copy to Sweden, to Dr. Beyer, requesting
-him to keep it to himself, for true divinity in Sweden was in a wintry
-state.
-
-Swedenborg’s long preservation from attack and controversy, at this
-time came to an end. On the 22d of March, 1769, Dr. Ekebom, Dean of the
-Theological faculty of Gottenburg, laid before the Consistory there
-a series of objections against Swedenborg’s theological writings,
-laden with untruth, and full of personal invective. The Dean branded
-his doctrine “as in the highest degree heretical, and, on points the
-most tender to every Christian, Socinian.” He stated, further, that
-he “_did not know Assessor Swedenborg’s religious system, and should
-take no pains to come at the knowledge of it_.” As for Swedenborg’s
-chief works, he “_did not possess them, and had neither read nor seen
-them_.” Swedenborg’s written reply, transmitted from Holland, was mild
-and effectual. He cited his writings themselves, and proved that,
-according to Scripture, the Apostolic Creed, and whatever was not
-self-contradictory in the orthodoxy of the churches, his doctrine was
-anything but heretical. But the self-acknowledged ignorance and prejudice
-of the Dean were not to be removed by anything he might say. “Was not
-this,” to quote Swedenborg’s own words, “to be blind in the forehead,
-and to have eyes behind, and even those covered with a film? To see and
-decide upon writings in such a fashion, can any secular or ecclesiastical
-judge regard as otherwise than criminal?”
-
-About the end of May, or the beginning of June, Swedenborg left Amsterdam
-for Paris, “with a design which,” in writing to Dr. Beyer, he says,
-“must not be made public beforehand.” We hardly understand the remark,
-except that he anticipated some difficulty with regard to the object
-of his journey,—the publication of another little work, entitled, “The
-Intercourse Between the Soul and the Body,” in the French capital.
-
-On his arrival in Paris, Swedenborg submitted his tract to M. Chevreuil,
-Censor Royal, who, having read it, informed him that a tacit permission
-to publish would be granted, on condition, as was customary in the case
-of doubtful books, that the title should say, “printed at London,” or
-“at Amsterdam.” This, Swedenborg’s nice sense of truth and honor could
-not submit to, and he abandoned his intention of publishing it in Paris.
-His enemies in Gottenburg then circulated a report that he had been
-ordered to quit Paris, which he, in a letter to Dr. Beyer, pronounced a
-direct falsehood, and appealed for the truth of the case to the Swedish
-Ambassador to France.
-
-“Rumor also,” writes Wilkinson, “has been busy with Swedenborg upon
-this journey. The French ‘Universal Biography’ connects him with an
-artist,—Elie,—who, it is alleged, supplied him with money, and furthered
-his presumed designs. Indeed, he has been accused of a league with
-the _illuminés_, and with a certain politico-theological freemasonry,
-centuries old, but always invisible, which was to overturn society,
-and foster revolutions all over the world. We can only say that our
-researches have not elicited these particulars, and that every authentic
-document shows that Swedenborg stood always upon his own basis,
-accepted money from no one, and was just what he appeared—a theological
-missionary, and nothing more.”
-
-The short visit to Paris was terminated by his departure for London,
-where, unfettered by censors, he published his little book—“The
-Intercourse Between the Soul and the Body.”
-
-One of Swedenborg’s warmest and most intelligent English friends, was the
-Rev. Thomas Hartley, A. M., rector of Winwick, Northamptonshire,—himself
-an author, and assistant translator of the first English edition of
-“Heaven and Hell.” At this time he wrote to Swedenborg, fearing that
-he might be in want of money, and offering to supply his needs; also
-requesting an account of his past life and connections, as a means of
-refuting calumnies. In his reply, Swedenborg satisfied him on these
-points. He says to Mr. Hartley: “I take pleasure in the friendship you
-express for me in your letter, and return you sincere thanks for the
-same: but as to the praises you bestow upon me, I only receive them as
-tokens of your love of the truths contained in my writings, and so refer
-them to the Lord and Saviour, from whom is all truth, because he is the
-Truth. John xiv. 6.
-
-“I live on terms of familiarity and friendship with all the bishops of
-my country, who are ten in number; as also with the sixteen senators,
-and the rest of the nobility; for they know that I am in fellowship with
-angels. The King and Queen also, and the three princes, their sons, show
-me much favor. I was once invited by the King and Queen to dine at their
-table,—an honor which is, in general, granted only to the nobility of
-the highest rank; and likewise, since, with the hereditary Prince. They
-all wished for my return home,—so far am I from being in any danger of
-persecution in my own country, as you seem to apprehend, and so kindly
-wish to provide against; and should anything of the kind befall me
-elsewhere, it can not hurt me. But I regard all that I have mentioned as
-matters of little moment; for, what far exceeds them, I have been called
-to a holy office by the Lord himself, who most graciously manifested
-himself in person to me, his servant, in the year 1743; when he opened my
-sight to the view of the spiritual world, and granted me the privilege
-of conversing with spirits and angels, which I enjoy to this day. I am
-a Fellow, by invitation, of the Royal Academy of Sciences at Stockholm:
-but I have never sought admission into any other Literary Society, as I
-belong to an angelic society, wherein things relating to heaven and the
-soul are the only subjects of discourse and entertainment; whereas the
-things which occupy the attention of our Literary Societies are such as
-relate to the world and the body. As for the world’s wealth, I have what
-is sufficient, and more I neither seek nor wish for. Your letter has
-drawn the mention of these things from me, with the view, as you suggest,
-that any ill-grounded prejudices may be removed. Farewell! and from my
-heart I wish you all felicity in this world and in the next; which I
-make no doubt of your attaining, if you look and pray to our Lord.—E.
-Swedenborg.” Dated, London, 1769.
-
-Mr. Hartley, in 1781, when far advanced in years, thus gives his opinion
-of Swedenborg:—
-
-“The great Swedenborg was a man of uncommon humility. He was of a
-catholic spirit, and loved all good men of every church, making at the
-same time all candid allowance for the innocence of involuntary error.
-However self-denying in his own person, as to gratifications and
-indulgences, even within the bounds of moderation, yet nothing severe,
-nothing of the precisian, appeared in him; but on the contrary, an
-inward serenity and complacency of mind were manifest in the sweetness
-of his looks and outward demeanor. It may reasonably be supposed that I
-have weighed the character of our illustrious author in the scale of my
-best judgment, from the personal knowledge I had of him, from the best
-information I could procure respecting him, and from a diligent perusal
-of his writings; and according thereto, I have found him to be the sound
-divine, the good man, the deep philosopher, the universal scholar, and
-the polite gentleman; and I further believe, that he had a high degree
-of illumination from the spirit of God, was commissioned by Him as an
-extraordinary messenger to the world, and had communication with angels
-and the spiritual world far beyond any since the time of the Apostles.
-As such, I offer his character to the world, solemnly declaring, that,
-to the best of my knowledge, I am not herein led by any partiality or
-private views whatever, being now dead to every worldly interest, and
-accounting myself as unworthy of any higher character than that of a
-penitent sinner.”
-
-Two others of Swedenborg’s English friends were Dr. Messiter and
-Dr. Hampé, who had been preceptor to George I. From a letter of Dr.
-Messiter’s, we extract the following remarks on Swedenborg’s character:—
-
-“I have had the honor of being frequently admitted to Swedenborg’s
-company, when in London, and to converse with him on various points
-of learning, and I will venture to affirm that there are no parts of
-mathematical, philosophical, or medical knowledge, nay, I believe I might
-justly say, of human literature, to which he is in the least a stranger;
-yet so totally insensible is he of his own merit, that I am confident he
-does not know that he has any; and as he himself somewhere says of the
-angels, he always turns his head away on the slightest encomium.”
-
-Swedenborg’s stay in England at this time does not seem to have been
-longer than sufficed for the transaction of his business; for in
-September, 1769, he sailed for Stockholm, arriving there at the beginning
-of October. But we must now suspend the narrative of his life to offer a
-few remarks on his little works,—“A Brief Exposition of the Doctrine of
-the New Church,” and “The Intercourse Between the Soul and the Body.”
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXIV.
-
- _“Brief Exposition of the Doctrines of the New Church,” and
- “The Intercourse between the Soul and the Body.”_
-
-
-“The Brief Exposition of the Doctrines of the New Church” is an
-exposition effected by means of comparisons between the doctrines of the
-New Church and those of Catholics and Protestants. The work is avowedly
-only a sketch, and the precursor of a larger book—“The True Christian
-Religion”—a work of some years, which will shortly demand our attention.
-The Catholic doctrinals are taken from the records of the Council of
-Trent; and the Protestant from the Formula Concordiæ, composed by persons
-attached to the Augsburg Confession. The disagreements between the tenets
-of the Old and New Churches are considered under twenty-five Articles,
-the heads of which we will condense and present to the reader.
-
-The Churches which, by the Reformation, separated themselves from
-the Roman Catholic Church, differ in various points of doctrine; but
-they all agree in the Articles concerning a Trinity of Persons in the
-Godhead, original sin from Adam, imputation of the merit of Christ,
-and justification by faith alone. The Roman Catholics, before the
-Reformation, held and taught exactly the same things as the Reformed did
-after it, in respect to these points; only with this difference, that
-they conjoined faith with charity or good works.
-
-The leading Reformers, Luther, Melancthon, and Calvin, retained all the
-tenets concerning a Trinity of Persons in the Godhead, original sin,
-imputation of the merits of Christ, and justification by faith, just as
-they were, and had been, among the Roman Catholics; but they separated
-charity or good works from that faith, and declared at the same time that
-they were not of a saving efficacy, with a view to be totally severed
-from the Roman Catholics as to the very essentials of the Church, which
-are faith and charity. Nevertheless the leading Reformers adjoined good
-works, and even conjoined them to their faith, but in man as a passive
-subject; whereas the Roman Catholics conjoin them in man as an active
-subject; and notwithstanding this, there is actually a conformity between
-the one and the other as to faith, works, and merit.
-
-The whole system of theology in the Christian World, at this day, is
-founded on an idea of three Gods, arising from the doctrine of a Trinity
-of Persons, and when this doctrine is rejected, then all the tenets of
-the aforesaid theology fall to pieces. The truth of this must be apparent
-to every one. The Doctrine of a Trinity of Persons in the Divine Being,
-is the key-stone of Roman Catholic and Protestant theology. If this
-Doctrine be false, the whole structure totters to its fall.
-
-When the faith in three Gods is rejected, then it is possible to receive
-the true and saving faith, which is a faith in One God, united with good
-works.
-
-This faith is in God the Saviour Jesus Christ, and in its simple form is
-as follows: 1. That there is One God, in whom is a Divine Trinity, and
-that He is the Lord Jesus Christ. 2. That saving faith is to believe in
-Him. 3. That evils ought to be shunned, because they are of the devil and
-from the devil. 4. That good works ought to be done, because they are of
-God and from God. 5. That they ought to be done by man as of himself,
-but with a belief that they are from the Lord, operating in him and by
-him.
-
-The faith of the present day has separated religion from the Church,
-since religion consists in the acknowledgment of One God, and in the
-worship of Him from faith grounded in charity; but the faith of the
-present Church cannot be conjoined with charity, and produce any fruits
-which are good works, because imputation supplies everything, remits
-guilt, justifies, sanctifies, regenerates; imparts the life of heaven,
-and thus salvation; and all this freely, without any works of man. In
-this case, what is charity, which ought to be united with faith, but
-something vain and superfluous, and a mere addition and supplement to
-imputation, and justification, to which, nevertheless, it adds no weight
-or value?
-
-From this faith results a worship of the mouth and not of the life. Now
-the Lord accepts the worship of the mouth in proportion as it proceeds
-from the worship of the life.
-
-The doctrine of the present Church is interwoven with many paradoxes,
-which are to be embraced by faith. Therefore its tenets gain admission
-into the memory only, and not at all into the understanding, which is
-superior to the memory, but merely into confirmations below it. Thus the
-tenets of the present Church cannot be learned or retained without great
-difficulty, nor can they be preached or taught without using great care
-and caution to conceal their nakedness, because sound reason neither
-discerns nor perceives them.
-
-The doctrine of the faith of the present Church ascribes to God human
-passions and infirmities; as, that He beheld man from anger, that He
-required to be reconciled, that He is reconciled through the love He bore
-towards the Son, and by His intercession; and that He required to be
-appeased by the sight of His Son’s sufferings, and thus to be brought
-back to mercy; and that He imputes the righteousness of His Son to an
-unrighteous man who supplicates it from faith alone; and that thus from
-an enemy He makes him a friend, and from a child of wrath a child of
-grace:—all which dogmas are the opposite of the truth, and repulsive to
-every wise man.
-
-The faith of the present Church has produced monstrous births; for
-instance, instantaneous salvation by an immediate act of mercy;
-predestination; the notion that God has no respect unto the actions of
-men, but unto faith alone; that there is no connection between charity
-and faith; that man in conversion is like a stock; with many more
-heresies of the same kind; likewise concerning the sacraments of Baptism
-and the Holy Supper, as to the advantages reasonably to be expected from
-them, when considered according to the doctrine of justification by faith
-alone; as also with regard to the person of Christ: and that heresies,
-from the first ages to the present day, have sprung up from no other
-source than from the doctrine founded on the idea of three Divine Persons
-or Gods.
-
-The last state of the present church, when it is at an end, is meant by
-the consummation of the age, and the coming of the Lord at that period.
-Matt. xxiv. 3.
-
-The infestation from falses, and thence the consummation of every truth,
-or the desolation which at this day prevails in the Christian Churches,
-is meant by the great affliction, such as was not from the beginning of
-the world, nor ever shall be: Matt. xxiv. 21: and that there would be
-neither love nor faith, nor the knowledge of good and truth, in the last
-time of the Christian Church, is understood by these words in the same
-chapter of Matthew: “After the affliction of those days, the sun shall
-be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall
-fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken,” verse
-29.
-
-They who are in the present justifying faith, are meant by the he-goats
-in Daniel and Matthew; and they who have confirmed themselves therein,
-are meant in the Apocalypse by the dragon and his two beasts, and by the
-locusts; and this same faith, when confirmed, is there meant by the great
-city which is spiritually called Sodom and Egypt, where the two witnesses
-were slain; as also by the pit of the abyss, whence the locusts issued.
-
-Unless a New Church be established by the Lord, no one can be saved.
-This is meant by these words: “Unless those days should be shortened,
-there should no flesh be saved.” Matt. xxiv. 22. The reason why no flesh
-could be saved, unless those days should be shortened, is, because the
-faith of the present Church is founded on the idea of three Gods, and
-with this idea no one can enter heaven. Not that all who are believers
-in the doctrine of a tripersonal God are lost; but that, unless a New
-Church were provided by the Lord, and spiritual truth revealed, man,
-wanting truth, could never become regenerate, could never enter heaven,
-and thus the end of his creation would be defeated. In spite, however,
-of false doctrine, men are saved by the laying hold, as it were, of the
-truths leading to a good life, which exist in the most corrupt faiths,
-and goodness always contains an internal acknowledgment and love of
-truth, although false doctrine may fill the memory. Yet it is true,
-nevertheless, that false doctrine perverts, discourages, and in the end
-destroys all inclinations to live well. For this reason, then, the First
-Christian Church has come to its end, or has been consummated; and the
-Lord is raising up a New Church, endowed with truth capable of leading
-the world in the way of life, and to heaven.
-
-The opening and rejection of the tenets of the faith of the present
-Church, and the revelation and reception of the tenets of the faith of
-the New Church, is meant by these words in the Apocalypse:—“He that sat
-upon the throne said, Behold I make all things new; and He said unto me,
-Write; for these words are true and faithful.” xxi. 5. The New Church
-about to be established by the Lord, is the New Jerusalem, treated of in
-chapters xxi. and xxii., which is there called the Bride and the Wife of
-the Lamb.
-
-Such, briefly expressed, are the heads or leading ideas of the little
-work, “A Brief Exposition of the Doctrines of the New Church,” a treatise
-which, as Wilkinson truly remarks, “is unequaled among Swedenborg’s works
-for its destructive logic.”
-
-“The Intercourse Between the Soul and the Body,” is a small treatise
-designed to illustrate a subject which has puzzled many minds from
-time immemorial. Various have been the theories of philosophers on
-this subject; but few could satisfy the intelligent mind, or explain
-the varied phenomena of being. Swedenborg, in many of his previous
-works, had, with greater or less fullness, explained the nature of the
-soul’s union with the body, and this treatise is, to some extent, but
-a repetition of what he had elsewhere written,—cleared, however, from
-extraneous matter.
-
-His view of the subject is simple and intelligible, as is all truth.
-The soul of man is a spiritual substance, of the same form as his body;
-transfusing all the body’s tissues, and wearing the body as a garment,
-even as the body wears its clothes. The body lives from the soul. In
-itself, the body is dead and without sensation, as is evident when the
-man leaves it at death; it then returns to its inorganic elements. As the
-body is diseased or injured, the soul is more or less deprived of its
-power of action in the natural world, but the soul itself is uninjured.
-We see an illustration of this in the use of spectacles. Man’s external
-organ of sight is defective, and he cannot see objects distinctly.
-Glasses are put before his eyes, and he sees as well as ever. Now it is
-certain the glasses in themselves do not restore his sight. They merely
-complete the defective organ, and the eye of the spiritual man uses
-them as a means to look forth into the material world. Observation and
-meditation will supply a multitude of confirmations of this doctrine of
-the spiritual body animating and transfusing the material.
-
-At death the spiritual body lays down the material, and makes its
-appearance in its higher sphere. Whether it is beautiful or deformed,
-depends upon the man’s conduct on earth. If the soul has loved goodness
-and truth, it is a beautiful human form, and increases in grace and
-loveliness to eternity in heaven; if, on the other hand, it has lived in
-evil and hated truth, it is deformed and hideous, and finds its place in
-hell, the abode of all that is ugly and abominable.
-
-But from this it is not to be concluded that the soul has life in itself.
-Like the body, it also is dead, and is only a form receptive of life from
-the One Only Infinite Life, in whom the whole universe lives, moves,
-and has its being,—the Lord. The material body is proximately sustained
-by the light and heat of the material sun. The spiritual body of man
-is sustained by the light and heat of the spiritual Sun, which is the
-circumambient sphere of the Divine Love and Wisdom. From this spiritual
-Sun, our natural sun exists, even as our material bodies live from our
-spiritual bodies. But all alike exist and subsist from the Lord alone.
-
-Such, in a few words, is the leading idea of this little treatise. For
-the details, the charming confirmation and the able and simple refutation
-of the doctrines of Leibnitz and other philosophers, who have treated
-on the same subject, we can only refer to the book itself. We append
-the concluding paragraph of the treatise, as a delightful specimen of
-spiritual analogy:—
-
- “I was once asked, how I, who was previously a philosopher,
- became a theologian; and I answered, ‘In the same manner that
- fishermen became the disciples and apostles of the Lord: and
- that I also from my youth had been a spiritual fisherman.’ On
- this, he asked, ‘What is a spiritual fisherman?’ I replied,—‘A
- fisherman, in the spiritual sense of the Word, signifies a man
- who investigates and teaches natural truths, and afterwards
- spiritual truths in a rational manner.’ On his inquiring, ‘How
- is this demonstrated?’ I said, ‘From these passages of the
- Word: ‘And the waters shall fail from the sea, and the rivers
- shall be wasted and dried up. The fishers also shall mourn,
- and all they that cast a hook into the brook shall lament.’
- Isaiah xix. 5, 8. And in another place it is said, respecting
- the sea, whose waters were healed, ‘The fishers shall stand
- upon it, from Engedi even unto Eneglaim; they shall be present
- to spread forth nets; their fish shall be according to their
- kinds, as the fish of the great sea, exceeding many.’ Ezekiel
- xlvii. 10. And in another place, ‘Behold I will send for many
- fishers, saith Jehovah, and they shall fish them.’ Jeremiah
- xvi. 16. Hence it is evident why the Lord chose fishermen
- for his disciples, and said, ‘Follow me, and I will make you
- fishers of men;’ Matthew iv. 18, 19; Mark i. 16, 17; and why
- he said to Peter after he had caught a multitude of fishes,
- ‘Henceforth thou shalt catch men.’ Luke v. 9, 10. I afterwards
- demonstrated the origin of this signification of fishermen from
- the Apocalypse Revealed; namely, that since water signifies
- natural truths, as does also a river, a fish signifies those
- who are in possession of natural truths; and thence fishermen,
- those who investigate and teach truth. On hearing this, my
- interrogator said, ‘Now I can understand why the Lord called
- and chose fishermen to be his disciples; and therefore I do
- not wonder that he has also chosen you, since, as you have
- observed, you were from early youth a fisherman in a spiritual
- sense, that is, an investigator of natural truths; and the
- reason that you are now become an investigator of spiritual
- truths, is because they are founded in the former.’ To this
- he added, being a man of reason, that ‘the Lord alone knows
- who is the proper person to apprehend and teach the truths of
- His New Church, whether one of the primates, or one of their
- domestic servants. Besides,’ he continued, ‘what Christian
- theologian does not study philosophy in the schools, before he
- is inaugurated a theologian.’ At length he said, ‘Since you
- are become a theologian, explain what is your theology.’ I
- answered, ‘These are its two principles, _God is one, and there
- is a conjunction of charity and faith_.’ To which he replied,
- ‘Who denies these principles?’ I rejoined, ‘The theology of the
- present day, when interiorly examined.’”
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXV.
-
- _Persecution—Letter to the Academy of Sciences—Leaves Stockholm
- for the last time._
-
-
-On Swedenborg’s arrival in Stockholm, he found that the long peace he had
-enjoyed from external interference and persecution was at an end. The
-first manifestation of hostility took place in the seizure of some copies
-of his treatise on Conjugial Love, at Norkjoping, which he had sent from
-England, intending to present them to his countrymen. The ground of their
-seizure was, a law prohibiting the introduction of any works into Sweden
-at variance with the Lutheran faith. The seizure having taken place
-in the diocese of his nephew Filenius, he naturally turned to him for
-explanation and redress. Filenius thereon embraced and kissed his uncle,
-and assured him that he would fulfill all his desires, and procure the
-restoration of his books. But his actions were the reverse of his words;
-for he was, in fact, the prompter of the seizure, and secretly did all
-he could to insure their confiscation. By and by Swedenborg discovered
-the hypocrisy, and remonstrated with Filenius; whereupon he dropped the
-mask, and insisted on the books undergoing clerical revision before they
-could be surrendered. Swedenborg urged that as his treatise was not
-theological, but chiefly moral, its revisal by the clergy was absurd,
-and that such censorship would pave the way for a dark age in Sweden.
-But Filenius was unmoved; and Swedenborg, now fully convinced of his
-double dealing, likened him, as he well might, to Judas Iscariot, and
-said that “he who spoke lies, lied also in his life.” Having brought some
-copies of his treatise on Conjugial Love with him to Sweden, he presented
-them to many of the Senators, the Bishops, and the royal family. He had
-no fear of the result of free and open criticism. But worse things lay
-in store. Dean Ekebom, of Gottenburg, was indignant that Doctors Beyer
-and Rosen should have embraced Swedenborg’s views, and the clerical
-deputies from that town were instructed to complain of Swedenborg and
-his disciples to the Diet. They found in bishop Filenius, then President
-of the House of Clergy, a willing instrument to further their designs.
-They plotted to have Swedenborg put upon his trial, presuming that when
-questioned he would openly assert his divine commission and powers of
-spiritual intercourse, and then they would pronounce him insane, and have
-him committed to a mad-house. Count Hopken revealed to Swedenborg this
-cunning device of his enemies, and advised him to fly the kingdom. At
-this news, Swedenborg was much afflicted; and going into his garden, he
-fell on his knees, and prayed to the Lord to direct him what to do. After
-this prayer, he received the consolatory answer that _no evil should
-touch him_. And so it turned out. His inoffensive bearing, his rank
-and connections, all tended to intimidate his adversaries, and prevent
-the execution of their designed outrage. Had he been a farmer’s or a
-tradesman’s son, instead of being a bishop’s, his fate might have been
-very different.
-
-Bishop Filenius, however, succeeded in gaining the appointment of
-a committee of the House of Clergy on the Swedenborgian case. Its
-deliberations were kept secret. Nothing came of it that was unfavorable
-to Swedenborg. They disregarded the charges of Filenius, and spoke “very
-handsomely and reasonably of Swedenborg.”
-
-Filenius gained one point, however, in the presentation of a memorial
-to the king, requesting the attention of the Chancellor of Justice
-to the troubles at Gottenburg. To this request the king yielded; and
-the members of the Consistory of Gottenburg were commanded to send
-in an unequivocal representation of the light in which they regarded
-Swedenborg’s principles. On January 2d, 1770, Dr. Beyer, as one of the
-members of the Consistory, rose, and gave his bold and honest testimony
-in favor of Swedenborg and his writings. He said: “Convinced by
-experience, I must in the first place observe, that no man is competent
-to give a just and suitable judgment on those writings, who has not
-read them; or who has read them superficially, or with a determination
-in his heart to reject them, after having perused, without examination,
-some detached parts only; neither is he competent, who rejects them as
-soon as he finds anything that militates against those doctrines which
-he has long cherished and acknowledged as true, and of which perhaps he
-is but too blindly enamored; nor is he competent, who is an ardent, yet
-undiscriminating biblical scholar, who, in explaining the meaning of the
-Scriptures, confines his ideas to the literal expression or signification
-only: and, lastly, neither is he competent, who has altogether devoted
-himself to sensual indulgences, and the love of the world.” He then
-entered into the details of New Church doctrine, and concluded in these
-words: “In obedience, therefore, to your Majesty’s most gracious command,
-that I should deliver a full and positive declaration respecting the
-writings of Swedenborg, I do acknowledge it to be my duty to declare,
-in all humble confidence, that as far as I have proceeded in the study
-of them, and agreeably to the gift granted to me for investigation and
-judgment, I have found in them _nothing but what closely coincides with
-the words of the Lord himself, and that they shine with a light truly
-divine_.” These were noble and brave words to speak in the midst of
-enemies.
-
-The debate on his doctrines dragged its slow length along. His enemies,
-full of spite, were yet full of fear, and seemed to dread the result of
-an open attack upon Swedenborg. Still the petty persecution continued,
-until, at last, May 10th, 1770, Swedenborg took up his pen and addressed
-himself directly to the king. In this letter, he complains that he had
-met with usage the like of which had been offered to none since the
-establishment of Christianity in Sweden, and much less since there
-had existed liberty of conscience. He recapitulated his grievances.
-He said that he had been attacked, calumniated, and menaced, without
-the opportunity of defending himself; though truth itself had answered
-for him. He reminded his Majesty of their former interview. With great
-simplicity, he says: “I have already informed your Majesty, and beseech
-you to call it to mind, that the Lord our Saviour manifested himself
-to me in a sensible personal appearance; that he has commanded me to
-write what has been already written, and what I have still to write;
-that He was afterwards graciously pleased to endow me with the privilege
-of conversing with angels and spirits, and of being in fellowship with
-them. I have already declared this more than once to your Majesty in
-the presence of all the royal family, when they were graciously pleased
-to invite me to their table, with five senators, and several other
-persons; this was the only subject discoursed of during the repast. Of
-this I also spoke afterwards to several other senators; and more openly
-to their Excellencies Count de Tessin, Count Bonde, and Count Hopken,
-who are still alive, and were satisfied with the truth of it. I have
-declared the same in England, Holland, Germany, Denmark, and at Paris,
-to kings, princes, and other particular persons, as well as to those in
-this kingdom. If the common report is to be believed, the Chancellor has
-declared that what I have been reciting are untruths, although the very
-truth. To say that they cannot believe and give credit to such things,
-therein will I excuse them; for it is not in my power to place others in
-the same state in which God has placed me, so as to be able to convince
-them, by their own eyes and ears of the truth of those deeds and things
-I publicly have made known. I have no ability to capacitate them to
-converse with angels and spirits, neither to work miracles to dispose or
-force their understandings to comprehend what I say. When my writings
-are read with attention and cool reflection, (in which many things are
-to be met with, heretofore unknown,) it is easy enough to conclude,
-that I could not come to such a knowledge but by a real vision, and by
-conversing with those who are in the spiritual world. This knowledge is
-given to me from our Saviour, not for any private merit of mine, but
-for the great concern of all Christians’ salvation and happiness; and
-as such, how can any one venture to assert that it is false? That these
-things may appear such as many have had no conception of, and which, of
-consequence, they can not easily credit, has nothing remarkable in it,
-for scarcely anything is known respecting them.” He concluded by throwing
-himself upon the king’s protection, and requesting him to command for
-himself the opinion of the clergy on the case; also the production of
-various documents that had been produced at Gottenburg and elsewhere; in
-order that he, and those maligned together with him, might be heard in
-their defence, this being their right and privilege. He protested, that
-the only advice he had given to Doctors Beyer and Rosen, was to address
-themselves to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, as a means to heavenly
-good and blessedness; for He only has all power in heaven and on earth.
-Matthew xxviii. 18. Were this doctrine of the Supreme Divinity of the
-Lord Jesus Christ taken away, he averred that he would rather live in
-Tartary than in Christendom.
-
-Had the Consistory declared this doctrine heretical, it must have led to
-many strange issues. But the Consistory came to no decision, and their
-report on Swedenborg’s writings was never written. A short time before
-Swedenborg left Stockholm for the last time, the king said to him: “The
-Consistory has been silent on my letters and your works;” and, putting
-his hand on Swedenborg’s shoulder, he added, “We may conclude that they
-have found nothing reprehensible in them, and that you have written in
-conformity to the truth.”
-
-Throughout all this affair, Swedenborg remained perfectly calm; and,
-though a very old man, worked on as industriously as ever. It might seem,
-from what has been said, that the controversy had terminated entirely in
-his favor. But it was not so, as he, in the following year, 1771, found
-out; for then it appeared that his adversaries had succeeded in obtaining
-a strict prohibition against the importation of his writings into Sweden.
-It was his intention to send in a formal complaint to the States General,
-appealing against this prohibition; but it does not appear whether he
-fulfilled his intention, or not.
-
-Finally, he addressed a letter to the Universities of Upsal, Lund, and
-Abo, asserting that each of the estates of the kingdom ought to have its
-own Consistory, and ought not to acknowledge the exclusive authority of
-that of Gottenburg. He declared that religious matters belong to others
-as well as the priests. Thus ends our account of this affair. It may be
-said to be the only thing approaching to persecution that Swedenborg
-endured; and considering the many heterodox opinions that he broached, we
-can not but think that he had, on the whole, but little to complain of.
-Many who have followed him in the propagation of the new theology, have
-not gone so far, yet have fared worse. The gentleness and simple prudence
-which, during so many years, shielded him from interference, we can not
-too highly admire. But, above all, we must be struck with the remarkable
-providence of the Lord, shown in his protection: the Divine promise was
-truly kept, that he _should not be harmed_.
-
-His old associates of the Royal Academy of Sciences at Stockholm,
-received, at this time, his last communication. He wrote them a letter
-explaining some of the correspondences of Scripture, and their origin.
-In it, he says: “The science of correspondences was esteemed, by the
-ancients, the science of sciences, and constituted their wisdom; it
-would surely be of importance for some one of your society to devote
-his attention to it. Should it be desired, I am willing to unfold the
-meaning of the Egyptian hieroglyphics, which are nothing else but
-correspondences; these being discovered and proved from the Word, in
-the Apocalypse Revealed; and to publish their explications, is a work
-which no other person could accomplish.” We have no record as to how the
-Academy received this proposal. A copy of this letter was sent to Mr.
-Hartley, and Swedenborg desired that he and his friends would think over
-the subject. The letter is now published as an appendix to his treatise
-on the White Horse.
-
-Swedenborg now prepared to leave Stockholm for another journey. Writing
-under date of July 23d, 1770, to Dr. Beyer, he says: “As I am going, in
-a few days, to Amsterdam, I shall take my leave of you in this letter,
-hoping that our Saviour will support you in good health, preserve you
-from further violence, and bless your thoughts.”
-
-Robsahm tells us that, on the day that Swedenborg departed, he called
-on him, and “I then asked him,” says he, “if we should meet again. He
-answered me in a tender and touching manner: ‘I do not know whether I
-shall return; but I am assured I shall not die before I have finished
-the publication of the book entitled the True Christian Religion; and for
-which only I am now about to depart. But should we not see one another
-again in this lower world, we shall meet in the presence of the Lord our
-Heavenly Father, if so be that we observe to do his commandments.’ He
-then took a cheerful leave, and started on his last journey, with the
-apparent vigor of a man of thirty years of age, although he was then
-eighty-two. He took ship for Amsterdam, leaving his native land, never
-again, in the body, to return.”
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXVI.
-
- _Swedenborg in intercourse with General Tuxen and Paulus ab
- Indagine—His reply to Dr. Ernesti—Letter to the Landgrave of
- Hesse Darmstadt._
-
-
-On the voyage to Amsterdam, the ship that carried Swedenborg being
-detained, by adverse winds, off Elsinore, General Tuxen, hearing that
-Swedenborg was in the offing, determined to improve the opportunity; and,
-taking a boat, went off to see him. Introduced by the captain into the
-cabin, he found Swedenborg seated in an undress,—his elbows on the table,
-and his hands supporting his face, which was turned towards the door,—his
-eyes open and much elevated. The General at once addressed him. At this,
-he recovered himself, (for he had been in a state of vision,) rose with
-some confusion, advanced a few steps in visible uncertainty, and then
-bade him welcome, asking whence he came. Tuxen replied that he had come
-with an invitation from his wife and himself, to request him to favor
-them with his company at their house; to which he immediately consented,
-and dressed himself alertly. The General’s wife, who was indisposed,
-received him in the house, and requested his excuse if in any respect she
-should fall short of her wishes to entertain him: adding that for thirty
-years she had been afflicted with a painful disease. Swedenborg politely
-kissed her hand, and answered, “Let us not speak of this; only acquiesce
-in the will of God, and it will pass away, and you will return to the
-same health and beauty as when you were fifteen years old.” The lady
-made some reply, to which he rejoined, “Yes, in a few weeks.” From which
-they concluded him to mean that diseases which have their foundation in
-the mind, and are supported by infirmities of the body, do not disappear
-immediately after death.
-
-“Being then together,” says Tuxen, “in company with my wife, my now
-deceased daughter, and three or four young ladies, my relations, he
-entertained them very politely, and with much attention, on indifferent
-subjects, on favourite dogs and cats that were in the room, which
-caressed him, and jumped on his knee, showing their little tricks. During
-these trifling discourses,—mixed with singular questions, all of which he
-obligingly answered, whether they concerned this or the other world,—I
-took occasion to say that I was sorry I had no better company to amuse
-him than a sickly wife and her young girls: he replied, ‘And is not this
-very good company? I was always very partial to ladies’ society.’ After
-some little pause, he cast his eyes on a harpsichord, and asked whether
-we were lovers of music, and who played upon it. I told him we were all
-lovers of it, and that my wife in her youth had practiced, as she had
-a fine voice, perhaps better than any in Denmark, as several persons
-of distinction, who had heard the best singers in France, England, and
-Italy, had assured her; and that my daughter also played with pretty
-good taste. On this Swedenborg desired her to play. She then performed a
-difficult and celebrated sonata, to which he beat the measure with his
-foot on the sofa on which he sat; and when finished, he said, ‘Bravo!
-very fine.’ She then played another by Rutini; and when she had played
-a few minutes, he said, ‘This is by an Italian, but the first was not.’
-This finished, he said, ‘Bravo! you play very well. Do you not also
-sing?’ She answered, ‘I sing, but have not a very good voice, though
-fond of singing, and would sing if my mother would accompany me.’ He
-requested my wife to join, to which she assented, and they sang a few
-Italian duettos, and some French airs, each in her respective taste,
-to which he beat time, and afterwards paid many compliments to my
-wife, on account of her taste and fine voice, which she had preserved
-notwithstanding so long an illness. I took the liberty of saying to him,
-that since in his writings he always declared that at all times there
-were good and evil spirits of the other world present with man; might
-I then be bold to ask, whether now, while my wife and daughter were
-singing, there had been any from the other world present with us? To this
-he answered, ‘Yes, certainly;’ and on my inquiring who they were, and
-whether I had known them, he said it was the Danish royal family, and he
-mentioned Christian VI., Sophia Magdalena, and Frederick V., who, through
-his eyes, had seen and heard it. I do not positively recollect whether he
-also mentioned the late beloved Queen Louisa among them. After this he
-retired.”
-
-During this visit to General Tuxen, in the course of other conversation,
-Tuxen produced an autobiographical letter which Swedenborg had written
-to Hartley, and which began, “I was born in the year 1689.” Swedenborg
-told him that he was not born in that year, as mentioned, but in the
-preceding. Tuxen asked him if this was an error of the press. He said
-“No;” and added, “you may remember in reading my writings to have seen it
-stated in many parts, that every cipher or number has in the spiritual
-sense a certain correspondence or signification. Now,” said he, “when
-I put the true year in that letter, an angel present told me to write
-the year 1689, as much more suitable to myself than the other; ‘and you
-observe,’ added the angel, ‘that with us time and space are nothing.’”
-
-We give these anecdotes as Tuxen relates them. Every one, however, will
-know from his private experience how little absolute dependence is to
-be placed upon narrations of conversations, or actions, by even the most
-truthful. Sir Walter Raleigh, while writing his History of the World,
-was led to think of the errors into which he might be led, by observing
-that an affray beneath his prison wall was variously described by
-several eye-witnesses. If the occurrences of the present are so liable
-to misstatement, what sort of faith can we place in the history of the
-past? Wilkinson, commenting on this anecdote of the date of Swedenborg’s
-birth, remarks, in his usual keen style: “We have here a reason for
-that modification of events according to a context, of which the Gospel
-histories, so often discrepant from each other, furnish numerous
-instances. Manifestly it is the plan of the context which regards the
-events from its own point of view, and paints the narrative in its own
-colors. It is what all historians do in a lesser way, bending the history
-to ideas, or shaping it with an artistic force. Taking a certain larger
-block of time as a period of birth, it is hieroglyphically truthful to
-play down upon any date contained in the block, according to the subject
-and signification. There are many kinds of truth besides black and white;
-and generally, figurative truths require latitude of phrase. At the same
-time it must be confessed that one would like to know when the writing
-is pure history, and when it is a base of history, made use of for
-symbolical purposes, and touched, in part, by spirit. Literal people are
-apt to be offended otherwise, and we sympathize with them.”
-
-Swedenborg arrived in Amsterdam some time in September, 1770, and
-straightway set about printing his manuscript of the “True Christian
-Religion.” From two letters of a gentleman, named D. Paulus ab Indagine,
-who seems to have been on familiar terms with Swedenborg, we select
-the following passages, illustrative of this period of his life. He
-writes:—“You asked me what this venerable old man, Swedenborg, is now
-doing. This I can tell you; he eats and drinks very moderately, but
-keeps his chamber rather long, and thirteen hours appear to be not too
-much for him.[3] When I informed him that his work ‘On the Earths in
-the Universe’ had been translated and published, he was much delighted,
-and his eyes, which are always smiling, became still more brilliant. He
-is now indefatigably at work; yea, I must say that he labors in a most
-astonishing and superhuman manner at his new work. Only think! for every
-printed sheet, 4to, he has to procure four sheets of manuscript; he now
-prints two sheets every week, and corrects them himself, and consequently
-he has to write eight sheets every week; and what appears to me utterly
-inconceivable, he has not a single line beforehand in store.[4] His work
-is to consist, as he himself states, of about eighty sheets in print. The
-title of this work is the following:—‘True Christian Religion, Containing
-the Universal Theology of the New Church, Predicted by the Lord in Daniel
-viii. 13, 14, and in the Apocalypse, xxi. 1, 2; By Emanuel Swedenborg,
-Servant of the Lord Jesus Christ.’ I could not, in my open manner,
-conceal my astonishment that he should put himself upon the title page
-as the servant of the Lord Jesus Christ. But he replied: ‘I have asked,
-and have not only received permission, but have been ordered to do so.’
-_It is astonishing with what confidence_ the old gentleman speaks of
-the spiritual world, of the angels, and of God himself. If I were only
-to give you the substance of our last conversation, it would fill many
-pages. He spoke of naturalists, those who ascribe all things to nature,
-whom he had seen shortly after death, and amongst them were even many
-theologians, or such, at least, as had made theology their profession in
-this life. He told me things which made me shudder, but which, however, I
-pass by, in order not to be over-hasty in my judgment respecting him. I
-will willingly admit that I know not what to make of him; he is a problem
-that I can not solve. I sincerely wish that upright men, whom God has
-placed as watchmen upon the walls of Zion, had some time since occupied
-themselves with this man.
-
-“I can not forbear to tell you something new about Swedenborg. Last
-Thursday I paid him a visit, and found him, as usual, writing. He told
-me that he had been in conversation that same morning, for three hours,
-with the deceased king of Sweden. He had seen him already on Wednesday;
-but as he observed that he was deeply engaged in conversation with the
-queen, who is still living, he would not disturb him. I allowed him
-to continue, but at length asked him how it was possible for a person
-who is still in the land of the living, to be met with in the world of
-spirits. He replied, that it was not the queen herself, but her _spiritus
-familiaris_, or her familiar spirit. I asked him what that might be;
-for I had neither heard from him anything respecting appearances of
-that kind, nor had I read anything about them. He then informed me that
-every man has either his good or bad spirit, who is not only constantly
-with him, but sometimes a little removed from him, and appears in the
-world of spirits. But of this, the man still living knows nothing; the
-spirit, however, knows everything. This familiar spirit has everything in
-accordance with his companion on earth; he has, in the world of spirits,
-the same figure, the same countenance, and the same tone of voice, and
-wears also similar garments; in a word, this familiar spirit of the
-queen, said Swedenborg, appeared exactly as he had so often seen the
-queen herself at Stockholm, and had heard her speak. In order to allay
-my astonishment, he added that Dr. Ernesti, of Leipsic, had appeared to
-him, in a similar manner, in the world of spirits, and that he had held
-a long disputation with him. What will the learned professor say, when
-he comes to hear of it? Probably he will say that the old man is in his
-second childhood; he will only laugh at it, and who can be surprised? I
-have often wondered at myself, how I could refrain from laughing, when I
-was hearing such extraordinary things from him. And what is more, I have
-often heard him relate the same things in a numerous company of ladies
-and gentlemen, when I well knew there were mockers amongst them; but, to
-my great astonishment, not a single person thought of laughing. Whilst
-he is speaking, it is as though every person who hears him were charmed,
-and compelled to believe him. He is by no means reserved and recluse, but
-open-hearted and accessible to all. Whoever invites him as his guest, may
-expect to see him. A certain young gentleman invited him last week to be
-his guest, and, although he was not acquainted with him, he appeared at
-his table, where he met Jewish and Portuguese gentlemen, with whom he
-freely conversed, without distinction. Whoever is curious to see him, has
-no difficulty; it is only necessary to go to his house, and he allows
-anybody to approach him. It can easily be conceived, however, that the
-numerous visits, to which he is liable, deprive him of much time.”
-
-About this time, Dr. Ernesti attacked Swedenborg in his Bibliotheca
-Theologica, and, in reply, Swedenborg published a single leaf, which, in
-its decisive sharpness, is truly effective. It is as follows:—
-
-“I have read what Dr. Ernesti has written about me. It consists of
-mere personalities. I do not in it observe a grain of reason against
-anything in my writings. As it is against the laws of honesty to assail
-any one with such poisoned weapons, I think it beneath me to bandy words
-with that illustrious man. I will not cast back calumnies by calumnies.
-To do this, I should be even with the dogs, which bark and bite, or
-with the lowest drabs, which throw street mud in each other’s faces in
-their brawls. Read, if you will, what I have written in my books, and
-afterwards conclude, but from reason, respecting my revelation.”
-
-The Landgrave of Hesse Darmstadt now wrote to Swedenborg, requesting
-information on several subjects. Swedenborg having doubt as to the
-genuineness of the epistle, did not at first reply to it, until his
-misgivings were set aside by M. Venator, the minister of that prince. In
-his reply to the Landgrave, he says: “The Lord our Saviour had foretold
-that He would come again into the world, and that he would establish
-there a New Church. But as He cannot come again into the world in person,
-it was necessary that He should do it by means of a man, who should not
-only receive the doctrine of this New Church in his understanding, but
-also publish it by printing; and as the Lord had prepared me for this
-office from my infancy, He has manifested Himself in person before me,
-His servant, and sent me to fill it.”
-
-The Landgrave again wrote to Swedenborg, inquiring about the “miracle”
-of his intercourse with the Queen of Sweden’s brother, and Swedenborg
-answered that the story was true, but “not a miracle.” He also wrote
-to M. Venator, “that such matters ought, by no means, to be considered
-miracles: they are only testimonies that I have been introduced by the
-Lord into the spiritual world, and that I have been in association
-with angels and spirits, in order that the Church, which until now had
-remained in ignorance concerning that world, may know that heaven and
-hell exist in reality, and that man lives after death, a man, as before;
-and that thus there may be no more doubt as to his immortality. Deign, I
-pray you, to satisfy his Highness, that these are not miracles, but only
-testimonies that I converse with angels and spirits. You may see in the
-‘True Christian Religion’ that there are no more miracles at this time;
-and the reason why. It is, that they who do not believe because they see
-no miracles, might easily, by them, be led into fanaticism.”
-
-Writing of miracles, Swedenborg remarks in another place, “Instead
-of miracles, there has taken place, at the present day, an open
-manifestation of the Lord himself, an intromission into the spiritual
-world, and with it, illumination by immediate light from the Lord in
-whatever relates to the interior things of the Church, but principally
-an opening of the spiritual sense of the Word, in which the Lord is
-present in his own Divine light. These revelations are not miracles,
-because every man, as to his spirit, is in the spiritual world, without
-separation from his body in the natural world. As to myself, indeed, my
-presence in the spiritual world is attended with a certain separation,
-but only as to the intellectual part of my mind, not as to the will part.
-This manifestation of the Lord, and intromission into the spiritual
-world, is more excellent than all miracles; but it has not been granted
-to any one since the creation of the world, as it has been to me. The men
-of the golden age, indeed, conversed with angels; but it was not granted
-to them to be in any other light than what was natural. To me, however,
-it has been granted to be in both spiritual and natural light at the same
-time; and hereby I have been privileged to see the wonderful things of
-heaven, to be in company with angels, just as I am with men, and at the
-same time to pursue truths in the light of truth, and thus to perceive
-and be gifted with them, consequently to be led by the Lord.”
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXVII.
-
- _The True Christian Religion._
-
-
-In the early part of 1771, Swedenborg published his “True Christian
-Religion, or, Universal Theology of the New Church;” and in August of the
-same year took ship, and left Amsterdam for London. Let us now turn to
-the consideration of his last great work,—a summary of the doctrines he
-was commissioned to teach.
-
-“The True Christian Religion, containing the Universal Theology of the
-New Church,” the last work published by Swedenborg, may be looked upon
-as the summary of his spiritual thought, his theological labors, his
-heavenly message to mankind. In its ninth English edition, it forms a
-large octavo volume of 815 pages, and is a complete body of divinity. It
-is divided into fifteen chapters, a Supplement treating of the states of
-Luther, Calvin, and Melancthon, the Dutch, English, Germans, Papists,
-Romish saints, Mahommedans, and the Africans, in the spiritual world; and
-seventy-seven memorable relations of scenes and representations witnessed
-in that world, interspersed between the various chapters; altogether
-forming a volume unique in literature, ancient or modern. At the risk
-of an occasional repetition of what has before been said, let us take a
-rapid survey of the contents of this massive and marvellous work.
-
-Chapter I. treats of God the Creator, His Unity, the Divine Esse which
-is Jehovah, His Infinity or His Immensity and Eternity, the Essence of
-God which is His Divine Love and Wisdom, His Omnipotence, Omniscience,
-and Omnipresence, and of the creation of the universe. On these sublime
-subjects, themes on which, for ages, the weary reason of man has exerted
-itself with the poorest results, Swedenborg, with a mathematical
-exactness, sets forth the true doctrine; and with a simplicity of logic
-which at every step calls the Word of God, and the reason and common
-sense of man, to witness; leading the reader to wonder why truths so
-simple, so soul-satisfying, should have been hidden from human eyes so
-long. Whilst elucidating subjects commonly supposed to transcend human
-ideas, and yet which humanity is ever restless to discover,—reverence is
-in nowise deprived of its exercise. It is a great mistake, yet a common
-one, to associate mystery with true reverence; to talk of “ignorance” as
-“the mother of devotion.” Let any one ask himself whether the reverence
-of Sir Isaac Newton for that God whose operations in the universe he
-was favored to discover, was inferior to that of an ignorant devotee,
-or an illiterate peasant. No. A knowledge of God and His attributes is
-no destroyer of faith, reverence, or devotion, but the reverse. Our
-knowledge of Him, however extended, is but the enlargement of a circle,
-which, as it is enlarged, expands our conception of the infinity beyond.
-Hence it is that whilst this chapter on God the Creator, goes into
-details which are the death of mysticism, the truths which it opens to
-the mind lead to an intelligent and reverential love, to which ignorance
-can never attain.
-
-Chapter II. is devoted to the consideration of the Lord the Redeemer.
-It tells how Jehovah God descended and assumed humanity, that He might
-redeem and save mankind; and how the humanity was united to the Divinity,
-and thus God was made man, and man God, in one Person; that Redemption
-consisted in bringing the hells into subjection, and the heavens into
-order, and in thus preparing the way for a new spiritual Church; and how,
-without such Redemption, neither could men have been saved, nor could the
-angels have remained in a state of integrity. Thus Redemption was a work
-purely divine, and could not have been effected but by God Incarnate.
-The passion of the cross was in itself alone not Redemption, but was the
-last temptation the Lord endured in His Humanity; and it was the means of
-the glorification of that humanity. Hence it is a fundamental error of
-the Church to believe the passion of the cross to be Redemption itself;
-and this error, together with that relating to three Divine Persons from
-eternity, has perverted the whole system of Christian theology.
-
-Chapter III. sets forth the doctrine of the Holy Spirit and the Divine
-Operation. The Holy Spirit is the Divine Truth, and also the Divine
-Virtue and Operation, proceeding from the One God, in whom there is
-the Divine Trinity, thus from the Lord God the Saviour, Jesus Christ.
-The Divine Virtue and Operation in and on humanity, signified by the
-Holy Spirit, consists, in general, in reformation and regeneration;
-and, in proportion as these are effected, in renovation, vivification,
-sanctification, and justification; and in proportion as these are
-effected, in purification from evils, remission of sins, and finally
-salvation. The Holy Spirit being the efflux of Jehovah through the
-glorified humanity, did not exist until after the incarnation. Hence it
-is nowhere said in the Old Testament, that the prophets spoke from the
-Holy Spirit, but from Jehovah God. We have a beautiful and irresistible
-confirmation of this truth in these words, “for the Holy Spirit was not
-_yet, because_ that Jesus was not yet glorified.” John vii. 39.
-
-In this chapter he also speaks of the Trinity. There is a Divine Trinity,
-consisting of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; and these three are the
-three _Essentials_ of One God,—which make a One, like soul, body, and
-operation in man. To conceive of a Trinity of Divine _persons_ from
-eternity, is to think of three Gods; and no amount of word-playing and
-creed-making can prevent the mind from falling into Tritheism, as long as
-a Trinity of _persons_ and not of _essentials_ is spoken and thought of.
-A Trinity of persons was unknown in the Apostolic Church. The doctrine
-was first broached by the Council of Nice, and thence received into the
-Roman Catholic Church, and thus propagated among the Reformed Churches.
-The Nicene and Athanasian doctrines concerning a Trinity, have, together,
-given rise to a faith which has entirely perverted the Christian Church;
-and hence has come that “abomination of desolation, and that affliction,
-such as was not in all the world, neither shall be,” which the Lord
-has foretold in Daniel, the Evangelists, and the Revelation. For when
-the Church ceases to know its God, the central point of all faith and
-doctrine, all subsidiary points must necessarily become involved in
-darkness. And thus it is that the Athanasian creed has given rise to
-so many absurd notions about God, and hence, also, to an innumerable
-brood of heresies and phantasies on every point of doctrine and life,
-so much so, that had not the Lord effected a Last Judgment in 1757, and
-established a New Heaven and a New Church, no flesh could have been
-saved. The “healing of the nations,” the new life, light and heat, that
-have coursed through humanity during the past century, attest the working
-of Omnipotence for the salvation and restoration of what is most valuable
-and precious in man.
-
-Chapter IV. is an exposition of the nature of the Sacred Scripture, or
-the Word of the Lord, proving it to be the Divine Truth itself. The
-spiritual sense of the Word, and the means by which it is unfolded,
-together with the law of its composition, are explained at length, and
-with great perspicuity. It is shown that the spiritual sense is in all
-and every part of the Word, that hence it is divinely inspired, and is
-holy in every syllable. Nevertheless the literal sense is not to be
-disregarded. It is the basis, the continent, and the firmament of the
-spiritual sense; in it the Divine Truth is in its fullness, its sanctity,
-and its power; from it the doctrine of the Church is to be drawn and
-confirmed; and by it conjunction with the Lord and consociation with the
-angels is effected. The Word is in all the heavens, and the wisdom of
-the angels is thence derived. The Church exists from the Word, and the
-quality of the Church with man is according to his understanding of the
-Word. The marriage of Goodness and Truth, and of the Lord and the Church,
-is in every part of the Word. Men may collect and imbibe heretical
-opinions from the letter of the Word; but it is hurtful to confirm such
-opinions. Many things in the Word are appearances of truth, in which
-genuine truths lie concealed; and many fallacies arise from the taking
-of these appearances of truth for genuine or absolute truth. The literal
-sense of the Word is a guard to the genuine truths contained in it, and
-in the Word is represented by cherubs. To the wicked, it is a mercy
-that spiritual truth is thus hidden; for if known and not obeyed, it is
-profaned, and profanation involves the deepest suffering and distress.
-The Lord, during his abode in the world, fulfilled all things contained
-in the Word, and was thus made the Word, that is, the Divine Truth, even
-in ultimates. Previous to the Word which the world now possesses, there
-was a Word which is lost, but is preserved in heaven among the angels who
-lived as men in those times, and is also extant among certain nations in
-Great Tartary, who, however, have probably no true idea of the treasure
-they possess. By means of the Word, light is communicated to those who
-are out of the pale of the Church, and are not in possession of the
-Word. This is effected outwardly by the communications of commerce,
-with those nations who have the Word; and internally and insensibly
-by that community of soul which makes humanity appear before the Lord
-as one man. There is no thought conceived, no deed done, but which
-radiates from soul to soul, and produces effects of which the doer is
-not conscious. Thus it is that the Church—composed of the men who read,
-love, and obey the Word—benefits the world, and conjoins it with heaven
-and the Lord. Without the Word, no one would have any knowledge of God,
-of heaven and hell, or of a life after death, and much less of the Lord.
-The multiplicity of points involved in these statements, receive, in this
-chapter on the Sacred Scripture, most copious illustrations, both from
-the Word itself, and from the common experience of mankind. In reading
-this chapter, every candid person will feel that, strange and novel as
-many of the statements are, he is not dealing with a mere theorizer; and
-that facts and even Revelation itself must be done away, ere the doctrine
-of the Sacred Scripture here revealed can be overthrown or proved
-erroneous.
-
-Chapter V. explains the Decalogue, or the Ten Commandments, as to their
-external and internal sense. The Decalogue, in the Israelitish Church,
-was the very essence of holiness, and from it the ark and the tabernacle
-derived their sanctity. In the Ten Commandments are contained all things
-which relate to love to God, and love towards our neighbor. In its
-literal sense, the Decalogue contains general precepts of doctrine and
-life, but in its spiritual and celestial sense it contains all precepts
-universally. Swedenborg then takes up each commandment singly, and gives
-an exposition of its literal, spiritual, and celestial application; and
-when he has done this, we perceive that these Ten Commandments, which
-every school-boy repeats and feels he understands, nevertheless contain
-all precepts, and are such as may afford guidance to the wisest angel,
-and that man can never outgrow them. Taking, for instance, the Seventh
-Commandment, (the eighth, according to the common numbering,) “Thou
-shalt not steal,” he explains it in the natural sense, after the common
-acceptation. In the spiritual sense, he shows that to steal means to
-deprive others of the truths which they embrace in faith, in teaching
-doctrines known to be false, or teaching for the sake of gain; and in
-destroying in others, either by word or deed, those truths which lead
-to salvation. In the celestial sense, to steal is to take away divine
-power from the Lord, to be vain, to be proud, to arrogate to ourselves
-the merit and righteousness which are the divine gifts. All who do such
-things, notwithstanding their seeming adoration of God, do not trust
-in Him, but in themselves; and likewise do not believe in God, but in
-themselves; they steal from God; they are spiritual thieves; and every
-one who knows his own heart, must know how often he must refer to this
-commandment, in order to govern his life, and restrain his thoughts,
-before he can know perfect obedience, and be in truth a child of God. As
-with this commandment, so with all. We need to think of them every day,
-and to use them in all our states. If we purpose to lead a true and happy
-life, we must cherish them as constant companions.
-
-Chapter VI. treats of Faith. Faith, it is said, is first in regard to
-time, and charity is first in regard to end; that is, the use of faith is
-to lead to charity. A saving faith is a faith in the Lord God the Saviour
-Jesus Christ, because He is the visible God in whom is the invisible.
-Faith, in general, consists in a belief that the Lord will save all
-who live a good life and believe aright; and a man receives this faith
-in consequence of approaching the Lord, learning truths from the Word,
-and living a life in conformity with them. Faith without charity is not
-faith, and charity without faith is not charity; and neither faith nor
-charity has any life in it but from the Lord. Although a man has power
-given him to procure for himself faith and charity, and the life of faith
-and charity, yet nothing of faith, charity, or the life of either, is
-from man, but from the Lord alone. Charity and faith are together in
-good works; for charity consists in willing what is good, and good works
-consist in doing what is good, from and under the influence of a good
-will; and both charity and faith are merely mental and perishable things,
-unless they are determined to works, and coexist in them, whenever there
-is opportunity. The wicked have no faith, because wickedness is of hell,
-and faith is of heaven, and all the truth of faith is derived from
-heaven. Faith cannot dwell with evil, for evil is like fire,—infernal
-fire being the love of evil, which consumes faith like stubble, and
-reduces it and all that belongs to it to ashes. Evil dwells in darkness,
-and faith in light; and evil by means of the falsehood which it loves,
-extinguishes faith, as darkness does light. And because the world is at
-this day full of evil, (notwithstanding the morality of life, and the
-rationality with which faith is spoken and written about,) of true faith
-there is almost none, because of goodness there is almost none.
-
-Chapter VII. discourses of love towards our neighbor, and good works. It
-is introduced by the statement that there are three universal loves, the
-love of heaven, the love of the world, and the love of self. These three
-loves, when they are in right subordination, make a man perfect; but when
-they are not in right subordination, they pervert and invert him. The
-love of self and of the world are not in themselves evil. When the love
-of heaven, that is, the love of God, of goodness and truth, is supreme in
-the mind, and the world is loved as a means to do good, and self is cared
-for that uses to the neighbor may be performed,—then the love of self
-and of the world are orderly and justifiable. But when the love of God
-and heaven is dethroned, and the love of self or of the world rules, and
-a man is religious and just only so far as religion and justice conduce
-to self-interest and thus God and justice and all things holy are put to
-vile uses, then the soul of man is inverted,—is a form of hell; and in
-the light of heaven appears bestial, ugly, and deformed.
-
-Every individual man is the neighbor whom we ought to love, but according
-to the quality of his goodness or his life. Man considered collectively,
-that is, as a lesser or larger society, and considered under the idea
-of compound societies, that is, as our country,—is the neighbor that
-ought to be loved. The Church is our neighbor, to be loved in a still
-higher degree, and the Lord’s kingdom is our neighbor to be loved in
-the highest degree. To love the neighbor is not to love his person, but
-the good which is in him. Charity itself consists in acting justly and
-faithfully in whatever office, business, and employment a person is
-engaged, and with whomsoever he has any connection. Eleemosynary acts
-of charity consist in giving to the poor, and relieving the indigent,
-but with prudence. There are public, domestic, and private duties of
-charity. Public duties of charity are, more especially, the payment of
-imposts and taxes. These are paid with different feelings by those who
-are spiritual and by those who are natural: those who are spiritual pay
-them out of good will, because they are collected for the preservation
-and protection of their country and the church, and as a provision for
-the proper officers and governors, who must receive their salaries out of
-the public treasury, therefore those who consider their country and the
-church as their neighbor, pay such debts cheerfully and with a willing
-mind, and consider it a wicked act either to withhold them or to use any
-deceit in the payment; whereas those who do not esteem their country
-and the church as their neighbor, pay such debts with a reluctant and
-unwilling mind, and, as often as they have an opportunity, withhold
-them, or use some fraud in the payment; for they regard only their own
-house and their own flesh as their neighbor. The domestic duties of
-charity are of several kinds, as those of a husband to his wife, and of
-a wife to her husband; of parents to their children, and of children
-to their parents; likewise of a master and mistress to their servants,
-and of servants to their master and mistress. There are so many duties
-relating to the education of children, and the government of families,
-that it would require a volume to enumerate them. As to what particularly
-regards the duties of parents to their children, there is an intrinsic
-difference in this respect with those who are under the influence of
-charity, and with those who are not, although externally the duties
-may appear similar. With those who are under the influence of charity,
-parental affection is joined with love toward their neighbor and love
-to God, and such parents love their children according to their morals,
-virtues, pursuits, and qualifications for the service of the public;
-but with those who are not under the influence of charity, there is no
-conjunction of charity with parental affection; the consequence is,
-that such parents frequently love wicked, immoral, and crafty children,
-more than those who are good, moral, and prudent; and thus prefer such
-as are unserviceable to the public, before such as are serviceable.
-Private duties of charity are also of several kinds, such as paying wages
-to workmen, returning borrowed money, observing agreements, keeping
-pledges, and other transactions of a like nature, some of which are
-duties grounded in statute law, some in civil law, and some in moral
-law. These duties, also, are discharged from different motives by those
-who are under the influence of charity, and by those who are not; by the
-former they are discharged faithfully and justly, for the law of charity
-requires that a man should so act in all his dealings, with whomsoever
-he may have any connection; but these duties are discharged in a totally
-different manner by those who are not influenced by charity. Then there
-are convivial recreations of charity, which consist of dinners and
-suppers and social intercourse. Every one knows that dinner and supper
-parties are in general use, and are given to promote various ends; by
-many on account of friendship, relationship, mirth, gain, recompense,
-and for party purposes of corruption; among the great they are given on
-account of their dignity; and in the palaces of kings, for the display of
-splendor and magnificence. But dinners and suppers of charity are given
-only by those who are influenced by mutual love grounded in a similarity
-of faith. Among Christians in the Primitive Church, dinners and suppers
-had this end alone in view, and were called feasts, being instituted that
-they might meet together in cordial joy and friendly union. At table, the
-guests conversed together on various subjects, domestic and civil, but
-particularly on such as concerned the Church; and as these feasts were
-feasts of charity, their conversation on every subject was influenced
-by charity, with all its joys and delights. The spiritual sphere which
-prevailed on such occasions, was a sphere of love to the Lord and toward
-the neighbor, which exhilarated every mind, softened the tone of every
-expression, and communicated to all the senses a festivity from the
-heart; for from every man there emanates a spiritual sphere, derived
-from the affection of his love and corresponding thought, which inwardly
-affects those in his company, particularly at the time of convivial
-recreations.
-
-The first part of charity consists in putting away evils, and the second
-in doing actions that are useful to our neighbor. It is believed by many,
-at the present day, that charity consists only in doing good, and that
-while a man is doing good, he does no evil; consequently, that the first
-part of charity is to do good, and the second not to do evil: but the
-case is altogether the reverse, it being the first part of charity to put
-away evil, and the second to do good. For it is a universal law in the
-spiritual world, and thence too in the natural world, that so far as a
-person wills no evil, he wills what is good; consequently, so far as he
-turns himself away from hell, whence all evil ascends, he turns himself
-toward heaven, whence all good descends; and, therefore, so far as any
-one rejects the devil, he is accepted by the Lord. In performing the
-exercises of charity, a man does not ascribe merit to works, so long as
-he believes that all good is from the Lord. Moral life, if it is at the
-same time spiritual life, is charity. The friendship of love, contracted
-with a person without regard to his spiritual quality, is detrimental
-after death. The friendship of love, among the wicked, is intestine
-hatred toward each other. There is spurious charity, hypocritical
-charity, and dead charity. There can be no such thing as genuine charity,
-which is living, unless it make one with faith, and unless both in
-conjunction look to the Lord. Spurious charity is such as is the charity
-of those who hold to faith alone for salvation, and who say charity is
-of no account in leading to heaven. Such charity as these may have is
-spurious, because not spiritual, and merely performed from selfish and
-worldly motives. Hypocritical charity is predicable of those who, in
-public or private worship, bow themselves almost to the ground before
-God, pour forth long prayers with great devotion, put on a sanctified
-appearance, kiss crucifixes and bones of the dead, and kneel at
-sepulchers, and there mutter words expressive of holy veneration toward
-God, and yet, in their hearts nourish self-worship, and seek to be adored
-like so many deities. Dead charity is predicable of those whose faith
-is dead, since the quality of charity depends on the quality of faith.
-Faith is dead in all who are without works, and in those who believe not
-in God, but in living and dead men, and worship idols as if they were
-holy in themselves, after the practice of the old Gentiles.
-
-Chapter VIII. is devoted to the vexed question of Free-Determination,
-or Free-Will. The doctrines of the Church, as commonly held, are first
-stated, and then the New Church doctrine on the question is explained
-under the following heads:—The two trees in the garden of Eden, one
-of life, and the other of the knowledge of good and evil, signify the
-free-will which man enjoys in respect to spiritual things. Man is not
-life, but a recipient of life from God. Man, during his abode in the
-world, is held in the midst between heaven and hell, and thus in a
-spiritual equilibrium, which constitutes free will.
-
-From the permission of evil, which every man experiences in his
-internal man, it is evident that man has free-will in spiritual things.
-Without free-will in spiritual things, the Word would not be of any
-use, consequently the Church would be a nonentity. Without free-will
-in spiritual things, man would have nothing which would enable him to
-conjoin himself by reciprocation with the Lord; and consequently there
-would be no imputation, but mere predestination, which is detestable.
-Without free-will in spiritual things, God would be chargeable as the
-cause of evil. Every spiritual principle of the Church that is admitted
-and received in freedom, remains, but not otherwise. The human will and
-understanding enjoy this free-will; but the commission of evil, both in
-the spiritual and natural worlds, is restrained by laws, or else society
-in both would perish. If men were destitute of free-will in spiritual
-things, it would be possible for all men throughout the whole world, in
-a single day, to be induced to believe in the Lord; but this would be in
-vain, because nothing remains with man which is not freely received.
-Miracles are not performed at the present day because they deprive man of
-free-will.
-
-Chapter IX. treats of Repentance. It is shown, in the first place, that
-repentance is the first constituent of the Church in man, and that in
-proportion as a man practices it, his sins are removed; and as they are
-removed, they are forgiven or remitted. Contrition, in the sense of a
-mere lip-confession of being a sinner, and of being involved in the guilt
-of Adam, without self-examination, is not repentance. Every man is born
-with a propensity to evils of all kinds, and unless he remove them, in
-part, by repentance, he remains in them; and whoever remains in them can
-not be saved. The knowledge of sin, and the discovery of some particular
-sin in one’s self, is the beginning of repentance. Actual repentance
-consists in a man’s examining himself, knowing and acknowledging his
-sins, supplicating the Lord, and beginning a new life. True repentance
-consists in a man’s examining not only the actions of his life, but also
-the intentions of his will. Those also do the work of repentance, who,
-though they do not examine themselves, abstain from evils because they
-are sins; and this kind of repentance is done by those who perform works
-of charity from a religious motive. In repentance, confession ought to be
-made before the Lord God the Saviour, and at the same time supplication
-for help, and power to resist evils. Actual repentance is an easy duty to
-those who occasionally practice it, but it meets with violent opposition
-from those who never practiced it. He that never did the work of
-repentance, and never looked into, and examined, himself, comes at last
-not to know the nature either of damnatory evil or saving good.
-
-Chapter X. describes the nature of Reformation and Regeneration. Unless a
-man be born again, and, as it were, created anew, he can not enter into
-the kingdom of God. This new birth, or creation, is effected by the Lord
-alone, through the medium of charity and faith, during man’s coöperation.
-Since all are redeemed, all have a capacity to be regenerated, every one
-according to his state. The several stages of man’s regeneration answer
-to his natural conception, gestation in the womb, birth, and education.
-The first act of the new birth, which is an act of the understanding,
-is called reformation; and the second, which is an act of the will, and
-thence of the understanding, is called regeneration. The internal man
-is first to be reformed, and by it the external, and thus the man is
-regenerated. When this takes place, there arises a combat between the
-internal and external man, and then whichever conquers has dominion
-over the other. The regenerate man has a new will and understanding.
-A regenerate man is in communion with the angels of heaven, and an
-unregenerate man is in communion with the spirits of hell. In proportion
-as a man is regenerated, his sins are removed; and this removal is what
-is meant by remission of sins. Regeneration, can not be effected without
-free-will in spiritual things. Regeneration is not attainable without
-truths by which faith is formed, and with which charity conjoins itself.
-
-Chapter XI. is devoted to a description of what imputation is, and what
-it is not. It is shown that imputation, and the faith of the present
-church, which alone is said to justify, are a one. The imputation which
-belongs to the faith of the present time is two fold, the one part
-relating to the merit of Christ, and the other to salvation as its
-consequence. The faith which is imputative of the merit and righteousness
-of Christ the Redeemer, first took its rise from the decrees of the
-Council of Nice, concerning three divine persons from eternity; and,
-from that time to the present, has been received by the whole Christian
-world. Faith imputative of the merit of Christ, was not known in the
-Apostolic Church, which preceded the Council of Nice, and is neither
-declared nor signified in any part of the Word. An imputation of the
-merits and righteousness of Christ is impossible. There is such a thing
-as imputation, but then it is an imputation of good and evil, and at the
-same time of faith. The faith and imputation of the New Church can not
-be together with the faith and imputation of the former Church; and, in
-case they were together, such a collision and conflict would ensue, that
-every principle of the Church in man would perish. The Lord imputes good
-to every man, and hell imputes evil to every man. Faith, with whatever
-principle it conjoins itself, passes sentence accordingly; if a true
-faith conjoins itself with goodness, the sentence is for eternal life,
-but if faith conjoins itself with evil, the sentence is for eternal
-death. Thought is imputed to no one, but will.
-
-Chapter XII. is a luminous exposition of the uses of Baptism. Without
-a knowledge of the spiritual sense of the Word, it is shown no one can
-know what the two sacraments, Baptism and the Holy Supper, involve and
-effect. The washing which is called baptism, signifies spiritual washing,
-which is a purification from evils and falses, and thus regeneration.
-As circumcision of the heart was represented by circumcision of the
-foreskin, baptism was instituted in lieu of it, to the end that an
-internal Church might succeed the external, in which all and everything
-was a figure of the internal Church. The first use of baptism is
-introduction into the Christian Church, and at the same time insertion
-among Christians in the spiritual world. The second use of baptism is,
-that the Christian may know and acknowledge the Lord Jesus Christ the
-Redeemer and Saviour, and may follow Him. The third and final use of
-baptism is, that man may be regenerated. By the baptism of John, a way
-was prepared that Jehovah the Lord might come down into the world, and
-accomplish the work of redemption.
-
-Chapter XIII. is taken up with a like description of the uses of the
-Holy Supper. It is shown that it is impossible for any one, without an
-acquaintance with the correspondences of natural things with spiritual,
-to know the uses and benefits of the Holy Supper. An acquaintance with
-correspondences serves to discover the signification of the Lord’s flesh
-and blood, and that the bread and wine signify the same; namely, that
-the Lord’s flesh and the bread signify the divine good of His love, and
-likewise all the good of charity, and that His blood and the wine signify
-the divine truth of His wisdom, and likewise all the truth of faith,
-and that to eat signifies to appropriate. By understanding this, it may
-clearly be comprehended, that the Holy Supper contains, both universally
-and particularly, all things of the Church, and all things of heaven.
-In the Holy Supper the Lord is entirely present, with the whole of His
-redemption. The Lord is present, and opens heaven to those who approach
-the Holy Supper worthily; and He is also present with those who approach
-it unworthily, but does not open heaven to them; consequently, as baptism
-is an introduction into the Church, so the Holy Supper is an introduction
-into heaven. Those approach the Holy Supper worthily, who are under the
-influence of faith toward the Lord, and of charity toward their neighbor,
-thus, who are regenerate. Those who approach the Holy Supper worthily,
-are in the Lord, and He in them; consequently, conjunction with the
-Lord is effected by the Holy Supper. The Holy Supper is, to the worthy
-receivers, as a signing and sealing that they are sons of God.
-
-Chapter XIV., concluding the doctrinal portion of the work, describes
-the consummation of the age, the coming of the Lord, and the new heaven
-and the New Church. The consummation of the age is the last time or
-end of the Church. The present day is the last time of the Christian
-Church, which the Lord foretold and described in the Gospels, and in
-the Revelation. This last time of the Christian Church, is the very
-night in which the former Churches have set. After this night, morning
-succeeds; and the coming of the Lord is this morning. The coming of the
-Lord is not a coming to destroy the visible heaven and the habitable
-earth, and to create a new heaven and a new earth, according to the
-opinions which many, from not understanding the spiritual sense of the
-Word, have hitherto entertained. This, which is the second coming of
-the Lord, is for the sake of separating the evil from the good, that
-those who have believed and who do believe in Him, may be saved; and
-that there may be formed of them a new angelic heaven, and a New Church
-on earth; and without this coming no flesh could be saved. This second
-coming of the Lord is not a coming in person, but in the Word, which is
-from Him, and is Himself. This second coming of the Lord is effected by
-the instrumentality of a man, before whom He has manifested Himself in
-person, and whom He has filled with His spirit, to teach from Him the
-doctrines of the New Church by means of the Word. This is meant by the
-new heaven and the new earth, and the New Jerusalem descending out of
-heaven, spoken of in the Revelation. This New Church is the crown of all
-the Churches which have existed, to this time, on the earth.
-
-On all these subjects Swedenborg discourses at length, and in a style
-which, for its combined simplicity and purity, we believe, is unmatched
-in theological literature. Wilkinson says truly of the volume, that,
-“viewed as a digest, it shows a presence of mind, an administration of
-materials, and a faculty of handling, of an extraordinary kind. There is
-old age in it in the sense of ripeness. If the intellectualist misses
-there somewhat of the range of discourse, it is compensated by a certain
-triteness of wisdom. As a polemic, not only against the errors of the
-Churches, but against the evil lives and self-excusings of Christians,
-the work is unrivaled. The criticisms of doctrine, with which it abounds,
-are masterly in the extreme; and were it compared with any similar body
-of theology, we feel no doubt that the palm of coherency, vigor, and
-comprehensiveness, would easily fall to Swedenborg, upon the verdict of
-judges of whatever Church.”
-
-We have said nothing of the seventy-six memorable relations strewn
-through the pages of the “True Christian Religion,” because the limits
-to which we are confined forbid anything approaching to an adequate
-description of them. They are a great trouble to new readers of
-Swedenborg, and many who love and delight in the doctrinal teachings of
-the work, pass over, unread, the memorable relations, and try not to
-think of them. But this is only for a time. They are only strange and
-incomprehensible because the principles upon which they are written are
-not apprehended. The Indian king, who was told that in northern lands
-water became solid, so that his elephants might walk on it, laughed, and
-was an unbeliever. But, had the law or principle by which water becomes
-ice, been made plain to him, his laughter and his unbelief would have
-ceased. So it is with those who are shocked with Swedenborg’s relations
-of things heard and seen in the spiritual world. Let but the great law
-of correspondence be understood, and the most marvelous of the relations
-straightway attain an interest and reality, which none but those who have
-studied them under the bright light of correspondences can understand, or
-easily believe possible. A memorable relation, which was to the writer
-of this, at one time, a thing to cause pity for the man that wrote
-it, is now the pleasant and practical study of a Sunday afternoon. He
-knows that his experience in this respect is paralleled by that of most
-Newchurchmen.
-
-Count Hopken, in a letter to General Tuxen, says, “I once represented,
-in rather a serious manner, to this venerable man, (Swedenborg), that
-I thought he would do better not to mix his beautiful writings with so
-many memorable relations of things heard and seen in the spiritual world,
-concerning the states of men after death,—of which ignorance makes a jest
-and derision. But he answered me, that this did not depend on him; that
-he was too old to sport with spiritual things, and too much concerned for
-his eternal happiness to give into foolish notions; assuring me, on his
-hopes of salvation, that no imagination produced in him his revelations,
-which were true, and derived from what he had heard and seen.”
-
-“The True Christian Religion” was the last work Swedenborg published; it
-was a worthy conclusion of his grand labors. Among his papers, at his
-decease, was found an incomplete “Coronis” or Appendix to the work. This
-has been translated and published, and contains an elucidation of several
-interesting points.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXVIII.
-
- _Anecdotes and Traits of Character._
-
-
-Swedenborg arrived in London, from Amsterdam, in August, 1771, and
-took up his abode in lodgings he had before occupied in the house of
-Shearsmith, a peruke maker, at 26 Great Bath street, Cold Bath fields.
-From Shearsmith we learn several interesting items of intelligence
-regarding Swedenborg’s habits and mode of life.
-
-The dress that he generally wore when he went out to visit, was a suit
-of black velvet, (made after an old fashion,) a pair of long ruffles,
-a curiously hilted sword, and a gold-headed cane. In his later years
-he became less and less attentive to the concerns of the world. When
-walking abroad, he seemed to be engaged in spiritual communion, and took
-little notice of things and people in the streets. When he went out in
-Stockholm, without the observation of his domestics, some singularity in
-his dress would often betray his abstraction. Once when he dined with
-Robsahm’s father, he appeared with one shoe-buckle of plain silver, and
-the other set with precious stones,—greatly to the amusement of some
-ladies of the party. When he lodged with Bergstrom, he usually walked out
-after breakfast, dressed neatly in velvet, and made a good appearance.
-In Sweden his dress was simple, but neat and convenient: during winter,
-he was clad in a garment of reindeer skins; and, in summer, in a study
-gown: “both well worn, as became a philosopher,” according to Robsahm.
-Mr. Servanté was one of the earliest and most affectionate receivers of
-New Church doctrine. Before he received the truths of the New Church,
-he was once passing along St. John’s street, London, when he met an old
-gentleman, of a dignified and most venerable appearance, whose deeply
-thoughtful, yet mildly expressive countenance, added to something very
-unusual in his general air, attracted his attention very forcibly. He
-turned round, therefore, to take another view of the stranger, who also
-turned around and looked at him. This was Swedenborg; but it was not
-until some years afterward, on seeing his portrait, that he became aware
-that the dignified and venerable old gentleman was the author of those
-works he now so sincerely loved, and so earnestly studied.
-
-In person, Swedenborg was about 5 feet 9 inches high, rather thin, and
-of a brown complexion. His eyes were of a brownish grey, nearly hazel,
-and rather small. He had always a cheerful smile upon his countenance.
-When Collin visited him, he was thin and pale, but still retained traces
-of beauty, and had something very pleasing in his physiognomy, and a
-dignity in his erect stature. Ab Indagine tells us his eyes were always
-smiling; and Robsahm, that his “countenance was always illuminated by the
-light of his uncommon genius.” His manners were those of a nobleman and
-gentleman of the last century. He was somewhat reserved, but complaisant;
-accessible to all, and had something very loving and taking in his
-demeanor. Personally, he left good impressions behind him wherever he
-appeared.
-
-He did not understand the English language sufficiently well to hold a
-running conversation in it; and moreover he had an impediment in his
-speech. He was well acquainted, however, with the principal modern
-languages, and, of course, was thoroughly familiar with Greek and Latin,
-and had a sufficient knowledge of Hebrew. All authorities agree that his
-speech, though not facile, was impressive. He spoke with deliberation,
-and when his voice was heard, it was a signal for silence in others,
-while the slowness of his delivery increased the curiosity of the
-listeners. He entered into no disputes on matters of religion, but when
-obliged to defend himself, he did it mildly and briefly; and if any
-one insisted upon argument, and became warm against him, he retired,
-with a recommendation to them to read his writings. One day, when Mr.
-Cookworthy, a member of the Society of Friends, was with Swedenborg
-in his lodging, a person present objected to something he said, and
-argued the point in his own way; but Swedenborg only replied, “I receive
-information from the angels on such things.” One day, when dining with
-some Swedish clergy in London, a polemic tried to controvert the doctrine
-concerning the Lord, and the nature of our duty to Him; when, according
-to Mr. Burkhardt, “Swedenborg overthrew the tenets of his opponent, who
-appeared but a child to him in knowledge.”
-
-Swedenborg was practically a vegetarian. Shearsmith said he sometimes ate
-a few eels, and his servant informs us that he once had some pigeon pie;
-but his usual diet was bread and butter, milk and coffee, almonds and
-raisins, vegetables, biscuits, cakes, and gingerbread. The gingerbread he
-used to take out with him into the area of Cold Bath square, (now covered
-with houses,) and distribute it among the children as they played around
-him. He was a water-drinker, but occasionally, when in company, drank one
-or two glasses of wine, but never more. He took no supper. Of coffee he
-was a great drinker, which he took very sweet, and without milk. At his
-house in Stockholm, he had a fire during winter almost constantly in his
-study, at which he made his own coffee and drank it often, both during
-the day and in the night.
-
-From the commencement of his illumination, Swedenborg was very particular
-as to his diet; and his Diary contains many references to his food, and
-to the spiritual association which various kinds of nutriment induced.
-In one place we read under the heading of “the Stink of Intemperance,”
-“One evening I took a great meal of milk and bread, more than the spirits
-considered good for me. On this occasion they dwelt upon intemperance,
-and accused me of it.” Indeed, on the first opening of his spiritual
-sight, in London, in 1743, when being very hungry from much exercise, he
-ate with great appetite, the spiritual stranger who appeared, saluted
-him with the words, “Eat not so much.” In his treatise on Heaven and
-Hell, n. 299, he writes: “It has also been granted me to know the origin
-of the anxiety, grief of mind, and interior sadness, called melancholy,
-with which man is afflicted. There are certain spirits who are not yet
-in conjunction with hell, being yet in their first state, who love
-undigested and malignant substances, such as food when it lies corrupting
-in the stomach. They consequently are present where such substances are
-to be found in man, because these are delightful to them; and they there
-converse with one another from their own evil affection. The affection
-contained in their discourse thence enters the man by influx; and if it
-is opposed to the man’s affection, he experiences melancholy, sadness,
-and anxiety; whereas if it agrees with his affection, he becomes gay and
-cheerful. Hence was made manifest to me the origin of the persuasion
-entertained by some who do not know what conscience is, by reason that
-they have none, when they attribute its pangs to a disordered state of
-the stomach.” Of the killing and eating the flesh of animals, he writes
-thus in the Arcana Cœlestia, n. 1002. “Eating the flesh of animals,
-considered in itself, is something profane; for the people of the most
-ancient time on no account ate the flesh of any beast or fowl, but only
-grain, especially bread made of wheat, also the fruits of trees, pulse,
-milk, and what is produced from milk, as butter. To kill animals and to
-eat their flesh, was to them unlawful, and seemed as something bestial;
-and they were content with the uses and services which they rendered, as
-appears also from Genesis i. 29, 30. But in succeeding times, when man
-began to grow fierce as a beast, yea fiercer, then first they began to
-kill animals, and to eat their flesh. And because man was such, this was
-permitted, and at this day also is permitted; and so far as man does it
-from conscience, so far is it lawful, for his conscience is formed of
-all those things which he thinks to be true, and so thinks to be lawful:
-wherefore also, at this day, no one is by any means condemned for this,
-that he eats flesh.”
-
-Swedenborg took snuff, as was the custom in his day. Some of his
-manuscripts yet bear traces of the dingy powder.
-
-Shearsmith gives the same account of Swedenborg’s habits of sleep, as
-his gardener at Stockholm. He had no regard for times and seasons, days
-or nights, only taking rest as he felt disposed. This was naturally to
-be expected, considering the peculiarities of his seership. At first,
-Shearsmith was greatly alarmed, by reason of his talking day and night.
-Sometimes he would be writing, and then he would be, as it were, holding
-a conversation with several persons. But as Swedenborg spoke in a
-language Shearsmith did not understand, he could make nothing of it.
-Shearsmith was nevertheless well pleased with his lodger. His servant
-told Mr. Peckitt, after Swedenborg’s death, that “he was a good-natured
-man, and that he was a blessing to the house, for they had harmony and
-good business whilst he was with them.” A short time before his death, he
-lay for some weeks in a trance, without any sustenance.
-
-Swedenborg’s pension preserved him from all pecuniary cares. Yet in his
-Diary we read: “I have now been for thirty-three months in a state in
-which my mind is withdrawn from bodily affairs, and hence can be present
-in the societies of the spiritual and celestial. Yet whenever I am
-intent upon worldly matters, or have cares and desires about money, (such
-as caused me to write a letter to-day,) I lapse into a bodily state;
-and the spirits, as they inform me, cannot speak with me, but say they
-are in a manner absent. This shows me that spirits cannot speak with
-a man who dwells upon worldly and bodily cares; for the things of his
-body draw down his ideas, and drown them in the body.—March 4, 1748.”
-This experience is worthy of record. Most of us, in our own way, know
-the truth of it, from heart experience. Whatever his motives were, he
-would receive back no proceeds from the sale of his theological works,
-but dedicated the whole to religious subscriptions. To beggars he seldom
-gave anything. In his writings, he in several places protests against
-the sham charity which satisfies itself by mere alms-giving. He tells us
-that habitual beggars lead vicious and impious lives, and that to give
-them money is rather to curse than to bless them. Swedenborg did not lend
-money; for that, he said, is the way to lose it; besides, as he remarks,
-he required it nearly all to pay the expenses of his traveling and
-printing.
-
-In his later years, Swedenborg had no library but his Bible, in various
-editions, and his own manuscripts. What need had he of the books of men,
-when he knew the heavens,—and the glorified authors of earth, in states
-of wisdom they never dreamed of here?
-
-Swedenborg seldom went to church; for, as he said, he “had no peace in
-the church, on account of spirits, who contradicted what the preacher
-said, especially when he spoke of Three Persons in the Godhead, which
-amounted in reality to three Gods.”
-
-Swedenborg’s long and arduous labors on earth were now ended. Let us
-approach his death-bed with reverence, and observe how a good man can
-die.
-
-
-
-
-CHAPTER XXIX.
-
- _Last Days on Earth._
-
-
-On Christmas eve, 1771, a stroke of apoplexy deprived Swedenborg of his
-speech, and lamed one side. He lay afterwards in a lethargic state for
-more than three weeks, taking no sustenance beyond a little tea without
-milk, and cold water occasionally, and once a little currant jelly. At
-the end of that time, he recovered his speech and health somewhat, and
-ate and drank as usual. Mr. Hartley and Dr. Messiter at this time visited
-him, and asking him if he was comforted with the society of angels,
-as before, he answered that he was. They then asked him to declare
-whether all that he had written was strictly true, or whether any part
-or parts were to be excepted. “I have written,” answered Swedenborg,
-with a degree of warmth, “nothing but the truth, as you will have more
-and more confirmed to you all the days of your life, provided you keep
-close to the Lord, and faithfully serve Him alone, by shunning evils of
-all kinds as sins against Him, and diligently searching His Word, which,
-from beginning to end, bears incontestable witness to the truth of the
-doctrines I have delivered to the world.”
-
-At this time Swedenborg seemed to love privacy, and saw but little
-company. His old friend, Springer, the Swedish Consul in London, called
-upon him a week or two before his decease. Springer asked him when he
-believed that the New Jerusalem, or the New Church of the Lord, would
-be manifested, and if this manifestation would take place in the four
-quarters of the world. Swedenborg replied: “No mortal can declare the
-time, no, not even the celestial angels; it is known solely to the Lord.
-Read the Revelation, chapter xxi. 2, and Zechariah, chapter xiv. 9,
-and you will find that it is not to be doubted that the New Jerusalem,
-mentioned in the Apocalypse, which denotes a new and purer state of the
-Christian Church, than has hitherto existed, will manifest itself to all
-the earth.”
-
-About this time, says Springer, Swedenborg told him that his spiritual
-sight was withdrawn, after he had been favored with it for so long a
-course of years. This, of which the world knew nothing, and for which it
-cared nothing, it was the greatest affliction to him to lose. He could
-not endure the blindness, but cried out repeatedly, “O my God! hast thou
-then forsaken thy servant at last?” He continued for several days in this
-condition, but it was the last of his trials: he recovered his precious
-sight, and was happy.
-
-About this time he wrote a note, in Latin, to the Rev. John Wesley, to
-the following effect:—
-
- “GREAT BATH STREET, COLD BATH FIELDS, _February, 1772_.
-
- “SIR,—I have been informed, in the world of spirits, that you
- have a strong desire to converse with me. I shall be happy to
- see you, if you will favor me with a visit.
-
- “I am, sir, your humble servant,
-
- “EMANUEL SWEDENBORG.”
-
-When the note was handed to Mr. Wesley, he was in company with some of
-his preachers, arranging their preaching circuits for the year. Wesley
-read the note aloud, and frankly confessed that he had been strongly
-actuated by a desire to meet Swedenborg, but he had revealed his wish to
-no one. He wrote for answer, that he was then occupied in preparing for
-a six months’ journey, but would wait upon Swedenborg on his return to
-London. Swedenborg, in reply, stated that the proposed visit would be
-too late, as he should go into the world of spirits on the 29th day of
-the next month, (March,) never more to return. Wesley did not call, and
-they never met. Had he been wise, he would; in spite of engagements, have
-embraced this opportunity of conversing with that wonderful man, after an
-invitation of such a character. Had they met, Methodism might have been a
-different thing from what it is. But let us believe that all such seeming
-accidents are overruled for the best.
-
-The authority for this anecdote is the Rev. Samuel Smith, a Methodist
-preacher, who was present when Wesley received Swedenborg’s letter. It
-excited his curiosity to know something of the writings of so remarkable
-a man; and the result was, a firm conviction of the rationality and truth
-of the heavenly doctrine promulgated in them, and a zealous activity in
-their diffusion, throughout the remainder of his life.
-
-Mr. Bergstrom, the landlord of the King’s Arms tavern in Wellclose
-square, at whose house Swedenborg had once lodged, called to see him in
-his last days. Swedenborg told him, that since it had pleased the Lord
-to take away the use of his arm by palsy, his body was good for nothing
-but to be put under ground. Mr. Bergstrom asked him whether he would
-receive the Sacrament. Somebody present at the time proposed sending for
-the Rev. Mr. Mathesius, a minister of the Swedish Church. Swedenborg at
-once declined having that gentleman, for he had sent abroad a report that
-Swedenborg was out of his senses. (Mathesius himself, in later years,
-became deranged.) The Rev. Arvid Ferelius, another Swedish clergyman,
-with whom Swedenborg was on the best terms, and who had visited him
-frequently in his illness, was then sent for. Ferelius observed to him,
-that “as many persons thought he had endeavored only to make himself a
-name, or acquire celebrity in the world, by the publication of his new
-theological system, he should now be ready, in order to show justice to
-the world, to recant either the whole or a part of what he had written,
-since he had now nothing more to expect from the world which he was so
-soon to leave forever.” Upon hearing these words, Swedenborg raised
-himself half upright in his bed, and placing his sound hand upon his
-breast, said, with great zeal and emphasis, “As true as you see me before
-you, so true is everything which I have written. I could say more, were
-I permitted. When you come into eternity, you will see all things as I
-have stated and described them; and we shall have much discourse about
-them with each other.” Ferelius then asked him if he would take the
-Lord’s Holy Supper. He replied, “You mean well, but I, being a member
-of the other world, do not need it. However, to show the connection
-and union between the church in heaven and the church on earth, I will
-gladly take it.” He then asked Ferelius if he had read his views on the
-Sacrament. Before administering the Sacrament, Ferelius inquired whether
-he confessed himself to be a sinner. “Certainly,” said Swedenborg, “so
-long as I carry about with me this sinful body.” With deep and affecting
-devotion, with folded hands, and with his head uncovered, he confessed
-his own unworthiness, and received the Holy Supper. He then presented
-Ferelius with a copy of his Arcana Cœlestia, expressing his gratitude to
-him for his kind attentions.
-
-He knew that his end was near. He told the people of the house on what
-day he should die, and Shearsmith’s servant remarked, “he was as pleased
-as I should have been, if I was going to have a holiday, or going to some
-merrymaking.”
-
-His faculties were clear to the last. On Sunday, the 29th day of March,
-1772, hearing the clock strike, he asked his landlady and her maid, who
-were both sitting at his bed-side, what o’clock it was; and upon being
-answered it was five o’clock, he said, “It is well; I thank you; God
-bless you;” and in a little moment after, he gently departed. He was then
-84 years, 8 weeks, and five days, old.
-
-His body was taken to the undertaker’s, where it lay in state; and then
-was, on the 5th day of April, deposited in three coffins, in the vault of
-the Swedish Church, in Prince’s square, Radcliffe Highway, with all the
-ceremonies of the Lutheran faith,—the service being performed by the Rev.
-Arvid Ferelius.
-
-There the body still lies. No stone, or inscription marks the spot.
-Swedenborg of all men, least requires monumental commemoration.
-Every year enshrines his memory in increasing numbers of grateful
-hearts;—grateful to him, as a medium, whereby the Infinite Wisdom and
-Goodness might reach its end in blessing mankind by the advent of
-spiritual truth, and leading them within the gates of the Holy City, New
-Jerusalem.
-
-
-
-
-FOOTNOTES
-
-[1] The following account of Charles XII., written by Emanuel Swedenborg,
-was printed in the “Gentleman’s Magazine,” for September, 1754. It is
-a portion of a letter which Swedenborg wrote to M. Nordberg, while the
-latter was engaged in writing his “Life of Charles XII.,” in which work
-the letter appeared at full length. It is too long to be quoted here; the
-following extracts contain the pith of it. It may be proper to observe,
-that it was written by the author prior to his being called to the sacred
-office which occupied the last twenty-nine years of his life. This
-accounts for his speaking of the celebrated Swedish hero with so much
-greater respect than he is known to have afterwards entertained for his
-memory.
-
-“Having been frequently admitted to the honor of hearing his late most
-excellent Majesty, Charles XII. discourse on mathematical subjects, I
-presume an account of a new arithmetic invented by him, may merit the
-attention of my readers.
-
-“His Majesty observed then, that the denary arithmetic, universally
-received and practiced, was most probably derived from the original
-method of counting on the fingers; that illiterate people of old, when
-they had run through the fingers of both hands, repeated new periods over
-and over again, and every time spread open both hands; which being done
-ten times, they distinguished each step by proper marks, as by joining
-two, three, or four fingers. Afterwards, when this method of numeration
-on the fingers came to be expressed by proper characters, it soon became
-firmly and universally established, and so the denary calculus has been
-retained to this day. But surely, were a solid geometrician, thoroughly
-versed in the abstract nature and fundamentals of numbers, to set his
-mind upon introducing a still more useful calculus into the world,
-instead of ten, he would select such a perfect square, or cube number, as
-by continual bisection, or halving, would at length terminate in unity,
-and be better adapted to the subdivisions of measures, weights, coins,
-etc.
-
-“Thus intent on a new arithmetic, the hero pitched upon the number
-eight, as most fit for the purpose, since it could not only be halved
-continually down to unity, without a fraction, but contained within it
-the square of 2, and was itself the cube thereof, and was also applicable
-to the received denomination of several sorts of weights and coins,
-rising to 16 and 32, the double and quadruple of 8. Upon these first
-considerations, he was pleased to command me to draw up an essay on an
-octonary calculus, which I completed in a few days, with its application
-to the received divisions, coins, measures, and weights, a disquisition
-on cubes and squares, and a new and easy way of extracting roots, all
-illustrated with examples.
-
-“His Majesty having cast his eye twice or thrice over it, and observing,
-perhaps from some hints in the essay, that the denary calculus had
-several advantages not always attended to, he did not at that time
-seem absolutely to approve of the octonary: or, it is likely he might
-conceive, that though it seemed easy in theory, yet it might prove
-difficult to introduce it to practice. Be this as it may, he insisted
-on fixing upon some other that was both a cube and a square number,
-referrible to 8, and divisible down to unity by bisection. This could be
-no other than 64, the cube of 4, and square of 8, divisible down to unity
-without a fraction.
-
-“I immediately presumed to object that such a number would be too prolix,
-as it rises through a series of entirely distinct and different numbers,
-up to 64, and then again to its duplicate 4,096, and on to its triplicate
-262,144, before the fourth step commences; so that the difficulty of such
-a calculus would be incredible, not only in addition and subtraction, but
-to a still higher degree in multiplication and division; for the memory
-must necessarily retain in the multiplication table, 3,969 distinct
-products of the 63 numbers of the first step multiplied into one another;
-whereas only 49 are necessary in the octonary, and but 81 are required
-in the denary arithmetic; which last is difficult to be remembered and
-applied in practice, by some capacities. But the stronger my objections
-were, the more resolute was his royal mind upon attempting such a
-calculus.
-
- Obstructions made him eagerly aspire
- All to surmount, and nobly soar the higher.
-
-He insisted that the alleged difficulties might be overbalanced by very
-many advantages.
-
-“A few days after this I was called before his Majesty, who, resuming
-the subject, demanded if I had made a trial. I still urging my former
-objections, he reached me a paper written with his own hand, in new
-characters and terms of denomination, the perusal of which, he was
-pleased, at my entreaty, to grant me; wherein, to my great surprise, I
-found not only new characters and numbers, (the one almost naturally
-expressive of the other) in a continued series to 64, so ranged as easily
-to be remembered, but also new denominations, so contrived by pairs,
-as to be easily extended to myriads by a continued variation of the
-character and denomination. And further casting my eye on several new
-methods of his for addition and multiplication by this calculus, either
-artificially contrived, or else inherent in the characters of the numbers
-themselves, I was struck with the profoundest admiration of the force of
-his Majesty’s genius, and with such strange amazement, as obliged me to
-esteem this eminent personage, not my rival, but by far my superior in my
-own art. And having the original still in my custody, at a proper time I
-may publish it, as it highly deserves; whereby it will appear with what
-discerning skill he was endowed, or how deeply he penetrated into the
-obscurest recesses of the arithmetical science.
-
-“Besides, his eminent talents in calculation further appear by his
-frequently working and solving the most difficult numerical problems,
-barely by thought and memory; in which operations others are obliged to
-take great pains and tedious labor.
-
-“Having duly weighed the vast advantages arising from mathematical and
-arithmetical knowledge in most occasions of human life, he frequently
-used it as an adage, that _he who is ignorant of numbers is scarce half a
-man_.
-
-“While he was at Bender, he composed a complete volume of military
-exercises, highly esteemed by those who are best skilled in the art of
-war.”
-
-[2] The bookseller referred to was Mr. Bohn, of Henrietta street, Covent
-Garden.
-
-[3] It is not to be supposed that this time was wasted in sleep. In his
-meditations and spiritual intercourse, he, no doubt, loved the seclusion
-of his quiet chamber.
-
-[4] This is quite a mistake. His work he had in contemplation for some
-years. It is probable the revisal, alterations, and additions in the MS
-and in the proofs, led Paulus into this misconception.
-
-*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LIFE OF EMANUEL
-SWEDENBORG ***
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the
-United States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away--you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
- you are located before using this eBook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that:
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation's website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without
-widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
diff --git a/old/67821-0.zip b/old/67821-0.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index 1fafe08..0000000
--- a/old/67821-0.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/67821-h.zip b/old/67821-h.zip
deleted file mode 100644
index be64f71..0000000
--- a/old/67821-h.zip
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/67821-h/67821-h.htm b/old/67821-h/67821-h.htm
deleted file mode 100644
index 658b0b3..0000000
--- a/old/67821-h/67821-h.htm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,9552 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
- "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
-<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
- <head>
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
- <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
- <title>
- The Project Gutenberg eBook of Life of Emanuel Swedenborg, by William White.
- </title>
-
- <link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg" />
-
-<style type="text/css">
-
-a {
- text-decoration: none;
-}
-
-body {
- margin-left: 10%;
- margin-right: 10%;
-}
-
-h1,h2 {
- text-align: center;
- clear: both;
-}
-
-h2.nobreak {
- page-break-before: avoid;
-}
-
-hr.chap {
- margin-top: 2em;
- margin-bottom: 2em;
- clear: both;
- width: 65%;
- margin-left: 17.5%;
- margin-right: 17.5%;
-}
-
-div.chapter {
- page-break-before: always;
- margin-bottom: 1em;
-}
-
-div.chapter p {
- padding-left: 2em;
- text-indent: -2em;
- font-size: 90%;
-}
-
-div.chapter p.c {
- text-align: center;
- text-indent: 0em;
- font-size: 90%;
-}
-
-p {
- margin-top: 0.5em;
- text-align: justify;
- margin-bottom: 0.5em;
- text-indent: 1em;
-}
-
-table {
- margin: 1em auto 1em auto;
- max-width: 30em;
- border-collapse: collapse;
-}
-
-td {
- padding-left: 2.25em;
- padding-right: 0.25em;
- vertical-align: top;
- text-align: justify;
- text-indent: -2em;
- font-size: 90%;
-}
-
-.tdc {
- text-align: center;
- padding: 1em 0.25em 0.5em 0.25em;
- text-indent: 0;
- font-size: 100%;
-}
-
-.tdpg {
- vertical-align: bottom;
- text-align: right;
- padding-left: 0.25em;
- text-indent: 0;
- font-size: 100%;
-}
-
-.blockquote {
- margin: 1.5em 10%;
-}
-
-.center {
- text-align: center;
- text-indent: 0em;
-}
-
-.figcenter {
- margin: auto;
- text-align: center;
-}
-
-.footnotes {
- margin-top: 1em;
- border: dashed 1px;
-}
-
-.footnote {
- margin-left: 10%;
- margin-right: 10%;
- font-size: 0.9em;
-}
-
-.footnote .label {
- position: absolute;
- right: 84%;
- text-align: right;
-}
-
-.fnanchor {
- vertical-align: super;
- font-size: .8em;
- text-decoration: none;
-}
-
-.larger {
- font-size: 150%;
-}
-
-.noindent {
- text-indent: 0em;
-}
-
-.pagenum {
- position: absolute;
- right: 4%;
- font-size: smaller;
- text-align: right;
- font-style: normal;
-}
-
-.poetry-container {
- text-align: center;
- margin: 1em;
-}
-
-.poetry {
- display: inline-block;
- text-align: left;
-}
-
-.poetry .stanza {
- margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em;
-}
-
-.poetry .verse {
- padding-left: 3em;
-}
-
-.poetry .indent0 {
- text-indent: -3em;
-}
-
-.poetry .indent2 {
- text-indent: -2em;
-}
-
-.poetry .indent12 {
- text-indent: 3em;
-}
-
-.right {
- text-align: right;
-}
-
-.smaller {
- font-size: 80%;
-}
-
-.smcap {
- font-variant: small-caps;
- font-style: normal;
-}
-
-.tb {
- margin-top: 2em;
-}
-
-.titlepage {
- text-align: center;
- margin-top: 3em;
- text-indent: 0em;
-}
-
-.transnote {
- background-color: #E6E6FA;
- color: black;
- text-align: center;
- font-size: smaller;
- padding: 0.5em;
- margin-bottom: 5em;
-}
-
-.x-ebookmaker img {
- max-width: 100%;
- width: auto;
- height: auto;
-}
-
-.x-ebookmaker .poetry {
- display: block;
- margin-left: 1.5em;
-}
-
-.x-ebookmaker .blockquote {
- margin: 1.5em 5%;
-}
-
- </style>
- </head>
-<body>
-<p style='text-align:center; font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold'>The Project Gutenberg eBook of Life of Emanuel Swedenborg, by William White</p>
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
-most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
-of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
-at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
-are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
-country where you are located before using this eBook.
-</div>
-
-<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Title: Life of Emanuel Swedenborg</p>
-<p style='display:block; margin-left:2em; text-indent:0; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:1em;'>Together with a brief synopsis of his writings, both philosophical and theological</p>
-<p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Author: William White</p>
-<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Release Date: April 12, 2022 [eBook #67821]</p>
-<p style='display:block; text-indent:0; margin:1em 0'>Language: English</p>
- <p style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:0; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em; text-align:left'>Produced by: Peter Vachuska, Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net</p>
-<div style='margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:4em'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LIFE OF EMANUEL SWEDENBORG ***</div>
-
-<div class="transnote">
-<b>Transcriber’s Note</b>: Page numbering in the front matter was
-inconsistent in the original printing, with some numbers omitted. No
-pages are missing.
-</div>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_1"></a>[1]</span></p>
-
-<p class="titlepage larger"><span class="smaller">LIFE<br />
-<span class="smaller">OF</span></span><br />
-<span class="smcap">Emanuel Swedenborg</span>.</p>
-
-<p class="titlepage"><span class="smaller">TOGETHER WITH</span><br />
-A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF HIS WRITINGS, BOTH PHILOSOPHICAL<br />
-AND THEOLOGICAL.</p>
-
-<p class="titlepage"><span class="smcap">By WILLIAM WHITE.</span></p>
-
-<div class="figcenter titlepage" style="width: 150px;">
-<img src="images/tp.jpg" width="150" height="150" alt="" />
-</div>
-
-<p class="titlepage">PHILADELPHIA<br />
-J. B. LIPPINCOTT &amp; CO.<br />
-1880.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_2"></a>[2]</span></p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_3"></a>[3]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak">PREFACE.</h2>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>During the few past years many biographies of Swedenborg
-have been offered to the public. Dr. Tafel, of Tübingen, in
-1839, collected into one volume the testimonies of Swedenborg’s
-personal friends, his letters, and various documents relating to
-him which were scattered through many volumes. This “Book
-of Documents” was translated into English, and edited by the
-Rev. J. H. Smithson, of Manchester, in 1841; and was again
-reprinted in America and re-edited by Professor Bush, of New
-York, in 1847. From this “Book of Documents,” all the biographies
-which have appeared, have been more or less indebted.
-Nathanael Hobart, of Boston, arranged these documents into
-a connected biographical form, interspersed with judicious remarks
-of his own, and published it as a “Life of Swedenborg.”
-This “Life” has passed through three editions, and well deserves
-the success it has attained. In 1849, Elihu Rich published,
-in London, “A Biographical Sketch of Emanuel Swedenborg.”
-The edition was exhausted in the course of a few
-months, and the work has not since been reprinted. In the
-same year, J. J. G. Wilkinson produced his “Emanuel Swedenborg:
-a Biography,” a work which, alike for its artistic
-excellence as a biography, and the originality and poetic beauty<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_4"></a>[4]</span>
-of its thought, has, I believe, no equal in the English language.
-The comparative silence of our literary critics, in reference to
-this work, proves that any one who cares to appreciate what is
-best in the world, had better not be content to trust solely to
-<i>their</i> eyes. From the quotations I have made in the course of
-the following narrative, the reader will be able to appreciate a
-few of the good things contained in this Biography by Wilkinson.
-In 1854, Edwin Paxton Hood published “Swedenborg:
-A Biography and an Exposition,” a work which has been the
-means of introducing Swedenborg to a large circle hitherto
-almost ignorant of his existence. In the same year, Woodbury
-M. Fernald published, in Boston, Mass., “A Compendium of
-the Theological and Spiritual Writings of Swedenborg,” to
-which an excellent life of the Author was prefixed, compiled in
-great part from previous biographies. In other forms, many
-sketches of the life of Swedenborg have been published. The
-Rev. O. P. Hiller gives an excellent little biography in his volume
-of “Gems from Swedenborg.” Emerson tells the story
-of his life, in his own way, in “Representative Men;” and a
-Lecture by George Dawson, on Swedenborg, is now circulating,
-as a tract, by thousands throughout the land. All these things
-evidence a growing interest in the greatest teacher of modern
-times.</p>
-
-<p>The present work does not enter into competition with anything
-that has before been written. It pretends to nothing but
-simplicity, and would be ranked as a hand-book, a guide, a
-directory. If it should lead any to form an acquaintance with
-the writings of “the most <i>unknown</i> man in the world,” as Mr.
-Fernald calls Swedenborg, and I may add, the most abused man
-in the world, my end will be gained. I believe the day is not
-far distant when it will be the greatest reproach of these times<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_5"></a>[5]</span>
-that the works of Swedenborg lay in our midst, and only a few
-men cared for them. Happily this number is steadily increasing;
-and, by and by, we may expect a general acknowledgment of
-the fact, that Swedenborg was, without exception, the most
-gifted and extraordinary man that has ever lived.</p>
-
-<p class="tb smaller"><span class="smcap">36 Bloomsbury Street, London.</span></p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_17"></a>[17]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak">CONTENTS.</h2>
-
-</div>
-
-<table summary="Contents">
- <tr>
- <td></td>
- <td class="tdpg smaller">PAGE</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER I.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Birth and Parentage. Swedenborg’s First Ideas of Religion,
- and his Scholastic Life.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_I">21</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER II.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Travels, Becomes Author, and is crossed in Love.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_II">26</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER III.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Travels again. Publishes five Scientific Pamphlets, and
- “Miscellaneous Observations.” Returns Home and enters on the
- Duties of his Assessorship. Writes his “Opera Philosophica et
- Mineralia,” and goes abroad to publish it.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_III"> 35</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER IV.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“Opera Philosophica et Mineralia.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_IV">40</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER V.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Doings and Travels.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_V">47</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER VI.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“The Economy of the Animal Kingdom,” and “The Animal Kingdom.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_VI">51</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER VII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>His Life, as a Man of Science, ends.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_VII">57</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER VIII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>His Spiritual Sight opened, and the Conditions of his Seership.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_VIII">62</a><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_18"></a>[18]</span></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER IX.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Prepares for his New Office. Resigns his Assessorship. His
- “Adversaria.” His “Spiritual Diary.” The death of Polheim.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_IX">73</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER X.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“The Arcana Cœlestia.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_X">78</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XI.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Anecdotes.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XI">89</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“The Last Judgment.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XII">95</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XIII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“Heaven and Hell.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIII">102</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XIV.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“The White Horse.” “The Earths in the Universe.” “The New
- Jerusalem and its Heavenly Doctrine.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIV">130</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XV.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Anecdotes.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XV">136</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XVI.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“Doctrine of the Lord; The Sacred Scripture; Faith; and Life.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVI">142</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XVII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“The Divine Love and the Divine Wisdom.” “The Continuation
- of the last Judgment.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVII">151</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XVIII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“Angelic Wisdom concerning the Divine Providence.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XVIII">159</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XIX.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Life in Amsterdam. Character of the Dutch. Meets Dr.
- Beyer. Republishes his “New Method of Finding the Longitudes.”
- “The Apocalypse explained.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XIX">169</a><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_19"></a>[19]</span></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XX.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“Apocalypse Revealed.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XX">173</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXI.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Travels. Habits. Anecdotes.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXI">180</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“Conjugial Love.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXII">191</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXIII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Attacked by Dr. Ekebom. Visits France. Letter to Hartley,
- and Hartley’s opinion of Swedenborg.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXIII">204</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXIV.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“Brief Exposition of the Doctrines of the New Church,” and
- the “Intercourse between the Soul and the Body.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXIV">210</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXV.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Persecution. Letter to the Academy of Sciences. Leaves
- Stockholm for the last time.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXV">219</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXVI.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Swedenborg in Intercourse with General Tuxen and Paulus ab
- Indagine. His reply to Dr. Ernesti. Letter to the Landgrave of
- Hesse Darmstadt.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXVI">227</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXVII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>“The True Christian Religion.”</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXVII">236</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXVIII.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Anecdotes and Traits of Character.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXVIII">256</a></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="tdc" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXIX.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td>Last Days on Earth.</td>
- <td class="tdpg"><a href="#CHAPTER_XXIX">262</a></td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_21"></a>[21]</span></p>
-
-<h1><span class="smaller">LIFE AND WRITINGS<br />
-<span class="smaller">OF</span></span><br />
-EMANUEL SWEDENBORG.</h1>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>His Birth and Parentage—His first ideas of Religion, and his
-Scholastic Life.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>Authors are never wiser than when they trust to time
-for justice. The poor thinker, neglected by his age, unseen
-amid the glare of mere show and pageantry, need not fret
-himself. Time will roll on, the false and meretricious will
-sink into forgetfulness, while his true words will become
-accepted, and his thoughts the stars by which wise men
-guide their course across the dark ocean of life.</p>
-
-<p>It was the lot of Emanuel Swedenborg to be cast on a
-shallow, sceptical, and perverse age. Living a life of the
-utmost purity, and teaching truths which we esteem it our
-great felicity to know, he had but poor thanks so far as
-fame and disciples went. But the dawn of his day of
-justice is approaching. His name, which in past times has
-too often been used to point a sarcasm at whatever is
-visionary and transcendental, has of late years been slowly
-rising into estimation. Here and there, one eminent man
-after another has spoken some brave words in honor and<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_22"></a>[22]</span>
-admiration of the great Swede. Slowly, but surely, his
-writings are claiming attention; his disciples, though still
-few, are quietly earnest and enthusiastic, and ever and anon
-there is seen in the newspaper or periodical, the name of
-Swedenborg mentioned with respect, if not with reverence.
-Considerable curiosity exists in large circles to know more
-of him, of what he did, what were his doctrines, and the
-nature and number of his books. To satisfy, in some
-measure, these queries and if possible to incite a desire
-for an intimate personal acquaintance with the writings of
-Swedenborg, is the purpose of the present work.</p>
-
-<p>Emanuel Swedenborg was born at Stockholm, on the 29th
-Jan., 1688. The year is a memorable one, as being that
-in which outraged England drove the faithless Stuarts from
-the throne. His father’s name was Jesper Swedberg, and
-his mother’s, Sarah Behm; both descended from families of
-worth and usefulness in Sweden. His father, at the time of
-his birth, was chaplain to a regiment of cavalry. After
-passing through several offices, one of which was a professorship
-of theology in the University of Upsal, Jesper Swedberg
-was, in the year 1719, elevated to the bishoprick of
-Skara in West Gothland. His character stood high in
-Sweden. Simple, patriotic, and honest, he was, without
-being brilliant, a learned and industrious man. He wrote
-much, and published occasionally, as the following extract
-from his diary proves: “I can scarcely believe that anybody
-in Sweden has written so much as I have done; since,
-I think, ten carts could scarcely carry away what I have
-written and printed at my own expense, and yet there is
-much, yea nearly as much, not printed.” Of the professions
-of his sons, he wisely remarks; “I have kept my sons to that
-profession to which God has given them inclination and
-liking: I have not brought up one to the clerical office,
-although many parents do this inconsiderately, and in a<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_23"></a>[23]</span>
-manner not justifiable, by which the Christian Church and
-the clerical order suffer not a little, and are brought into
-contempt.” Writing in his diary forty years after Emanuel’s
-birth, he says: “Emanuel, my son’s name, signifies
-‘God with us,’ a name which should constantly remind him
-of the nearness of God, and of that interior, holy, and
-mysterious connection, in which, through faith, we stand
-with our good and gracious God. And blessed be the Lord’s
-name! God has, to this hour, been with him; and may God
-be further with him, until he is eternally united with Him in
-his kingdom.”</p>
-
-<p>Of Swedenborg’s childhood we have little record. In a
-letter which, late in life, he addressed to Dr. Beyer, he
-remarks; “With regard to what passed in the earliest part
-of my life, about which you wish to be informed: from my
-fourth to my tenth year, my thoughts were constantly
-engrossed by reflections on God, on salvation, and on the
-spiritual affections of man. I often revealed things in my
-discourse which filled my parents with astonishment, and
-made them declare at times, that certainly the angels spoke
-through my mouth. From my sixth to my twelfth year, it
-was my greatest delight to converse with the clergy concerning
-faith; to whom I often observed, that charity or love is
-the life of faith; and that this vivifying charity or love is no
-other than the love of one’s neighbor; that God vouchsafes
-this faith to every one; but that it is adopted by those only
-who practise that charity. I knew of no other faith or
-belief at that time, than that God is the Creator and Preserver
-of Nature; that He endues men with understanding,
-good inclinations, and other gifts derived from these. I
-knew nothing at that time of the systematic or dogmatic
-kind of faith, that God the Father imputes the righteousness
-or merits of the Son to whomsoever, and at whatever time,
-He wills, even to the impenitent. And had I heard of such<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_24"></a>[24]</span>
-a faith, it would have been then, as now, perfectly unintelligible
-to me.”</p>
-
-<p>This confession very vividly shadows forth the future
-man. We see how earnestly his sound, practical mind
-perceived and clung to the real and substantial in theology.
-His experience of the doctrine of justification by faith alone,
-finds parallels in the lives and experience of many eminent
-men. It was not until after many years’ preaching, that
-the fact of the existence of such a doctrine was presented to
-the mind of Dr. Chalmers, to whom also it was quite unintelligible;
-yet, overcome by the sphere of learning and
-prestige with which the doctrine was environed, Chalmers
-yielded assent to it, and fancied, as thousands do, he believed
-what by no possibility he could ever understand. Swedenborg
-was too single-eyed in his pursuit of truth to be led
-aside by authority, however imposing; and often, in the
-following narrative, we shall have to observe with what
-independence, yet with what humility and simplicity, he
-recorded the truths which it was his mission to reveal.</p>
-
-<p>This excellent son of good Bishop Swedberg received the
-best education that the times and his country could afford.
-In his twenty-second year, at the University of Upsal, he
-took his degree of Doctor in philosophy. The dissertation
-which he wrote for his degree was afterwards published. It
-consisted of a selection of sentences from Seneca, Publius
-Syrus Mimus, and other Latin writers, enriched by comments
-of his own, and notes illustrating the obscurities of
-the Latin text. This work was so highly thought of, as to
-occasion a poetic eulogy, written in Greek, to be inscribed
-to its author. Swedenborg dedicated this, his first literary
-production, to his father, in a prelude full of veneration and
-love. Its length alone prevents our gratifying the reader
-with the perusal of this beautiful tribute of filial affection.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_25"></a>[25]</span>
-Among his many virtues, it should not be accounted the
-least, that Swedenborg was a loving, dutiful son.</p>
-
-<p>The same year he published, in a work of his father’s, a
-Latin version of the twelfth chapter of Ecclesiastes, which
-proved, in a high degree, his mastery of the Latin language.</p>
-
-<p>In 1710, was finished the strictly scholastic period of
-Swedenborg’s life. He had now reached manhood, and
-must live as a man among men. His youth manifests less
-precocity than solid and regular development of mind. The
-record of his life at this time, evidences a common-sense
-appreciation of life and its duties, an honest love of virtue,
-and a desire to be useful in his day and generation. The
-sequel will show that his day of life was not unworthy of
-its dawn.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_26"></a>[26]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Travels—Becomes Author—Is crossed in Love.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>Having completed his university education, Swedenborg
-entered on his travels. In his journal, he thus briefly describes
-a four years’ absence from Sweden.</p>
-
-<p>“In the year 1710 I set out for Gottenburg, that I might
-be conveyed, by ship, thence to London. On the voyage,
-my life was in danger four times: first on some shoals, toward
-which we were driven by a storm, until we were within
-a quarter of a mile from the raging breakers, and we thought
-we should all perish. Afterwards we narrowly escaped some
-Danish pirates under French colors; and the next evening
-we were fired into from a British ship, which mistook us for
-the same pirates, but without much damage. Lastly, in
-London itself, I was exposed to a more serious danger.
-While we were entering the harbor, some of our countrymen
-came to us in a boat, and persuaded me to go with them
-into the city. Now it was known in London that an epidemic
-was raging in Sweden, and therefore all who arrived
-from Sweden were forbidden to leave their ships for six
-weeks, or forty days; so I, having transgressed this law, was
-very near being hanged, and was only freed under the condition
-that, if any one attempted the same thing again, he
-should not escape the gallows.</p>
-
-<p>“At London and Oxford I tarried about a year. Then I
-went to Holland and saw its chief cities. At Utrecht I tarried
-a long time, while Congress was sitting and ambassadors<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_27"></a>[27]</span>
-were gathering there from nearly all the courts of Europe.
-Thence I went into France, and passed through Brussels
-and Valenciennes to Paris. Here and at Versailles I spent
-a year. At the end of this time I hastened, by public coach,
-to Hamburg, and thence to Pomerania and Greifswalde,
-where I remained some time, while Charles the Twelfth was
-coming from Bender to Stralsund. When the siege began,
-I departed in a small vessel, together with a lady named
-Feif, and by Divine Providence was restored to my own
-country after more than four years’ absence.”</p>
-
-<p>While traveling he was not idle; for we find that in 1715,
-while at Greifswalde, he published an oration on the return
-of Charles XII. from Turkey, and a small volume of Latin
-prose fables. On his return to Sweden, he issued, at Skara,
-a little book of poems, written for the most part during his
-journeyings. These have been republished at various times;
-but, as poems, much cannot be said of them. Wilkinson, in
-his “Biography of Swedenborg,” remarks: “These poems
-display fancy, but a controlled imagination. If we may
-convey to the English reader such a notion of Latin verses,
-they remind one of the Pope school, in which there is generally
-some theme, or moral, governing the flights of the
-Muse.” Indeed, it was well that Swedenborg was but slightly
-endowed with the poetic faculty. Much of his future mission
-lay in fields which require the coolest and calmest of
-minds to describe; the sight and contemplation of which,
-would have sent a Shaksperian or Byronic temperament into
-extatic frenzies.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg, himself the son of a bishop, was connected
-with high and influential families in Sweden. One of his
-sisters was married to Eric Benzelius, afterwards Archbishop
-of Upsal; and another to Lars Benzelstierna, governor of a
-province. Other members of the family held high and responsible
-offices in the kingdom. A young man thus situated<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_28"></a>[28]</span>
-would find little difficulty in settling for life in a sphere of
-usefulness adapted to all his tastes. While on his travels on
-the Continent he wrote letters to Eric Benzelius, detailing
-every novelty in mathematics, astronomy, and mechanics,
-which came under his observation; besides sending home
-models of all such inventions as he thought might be useful
-to his country. These letters and services won for him considerable
-notice; and on his return to Sweden, he assumed
-the editorship of a new periodical work, entitled “Dædalus
-Hyperboreus.” Among the contributors to this magazine,
-was the celebrated mathematician, Christopher Polheim, who
-has been called the Swedish Archimedes. Swedenborg’s connection
-with Polheim seems to have led to his appointment
-to the office of Assessor of the Board of Mines, which he
-held with distinguished honor for many years.</p>
-
-<p>In the year 1716, Polheim invited him to go with him
-to Lund, on a visit to Charles XII., who had just escaped
-from Stralsund. He was very kindly received by the King,
-and obtained from him his official appointment as Assessor.
-He was to assist Polheim in his undertakings, to have a seat
-in the College of Mines, and to give his advice, especially
-when any business of a mathematical nature was on hand.</p>
-
-<p>Charles seems to have at once discerned the rare abilities
-of Swedenborg, and with a desire of uniting him in still
-closer bonds of amity with his favorite Polheim, he advised
-Polheim to give him his daughter in marriage. To this
-proposal Swedenborg appears to have been in nowise averse.
-He lived with Polheim, at once as his coadjutor, and as his
-pupil in mathematics; and having thus constant opportunities
-of seeing the fair Emerentia, Polheim’s second daughter,
-had become enamored of her graces. In one of his letters,
-he remarks: “Polheim’s eldest daughter is promised to a
-page of the king’s. I wonder what people say of this in relation
-to myself. His second daughter is, in my opinion,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_29"></a>[29]</span>
-much the handsomest.” The attachment, however, was not
-mutual, and the lady would not allow herself to be betrothed.
-Her father, who deeply loved Swedenborg, caused a written
-agreement to be drawn up, promising his daughter at some
-future day. This document, Emerentia, from filial obedience
-signed; but, as ladies generally do, when forced to love
-in this way, took to sighs and sadness, which so affected her
-brother with sorrow, that he secretly purloined the agreement
-from Swedenborg. The paper was soon missed; for
-Swedenborg read it over frequently, and, in his grief at its
-loss, besought Polheim to replace it by a new one. But as
-Swedenborg now discovered the pain which he gave to the
-object of his affections, he at once relinquished all claim to
-her hand, and left her father’s house. This was his last, as
-it was his first endeavor after marriage. In after years, when
-jocosely asked whether he had ever been desirous of marrying,
-he answered: “In my youth I was once on the road to
-matrimony.” And on being asked what was the obstacle,
-with his characteristic simplicity he said: “She would not
-have me.” Considering the studious and abstracted life
-which he eventually led, it is not to be regretted that he remained
-unwedded. That he was no harsh despiser of the
-sex, we know well from his writings; and that his life was
-in agreement with his books, we also know. The loveliest
-descriptions of female grace and beauty we have ever met
-with, are contained in his works, chiefly in his treatise on
-“Conjugial Love.” M. Sandell, a member of the Royal
-Academy of Sciences in Sweden, who pronounced a magnificent
-eulogium on his fellow-member, Swedenborg, shortly
-after his death, says: “Though Swedenborg was never married,
-it was not owing to any indifference toward the sex;
-for he esteemed the company of a fine, intelligent woman as
-one of the most agreeable of pleasures; but his profound<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_30"></a>[30]</span>
-studies rendered expedient for him the quiet of a single
-life.”</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg seems to have had much intercourse with the
-King. In one of his letters, he says: “I found his Majesty
-very gracious to me; more so than I could expect. This is
-a good omen for the future. Every day I laid mathematical
-subjects before his Majesty, who allowed everything to please
-him. When the eclipse took place, I had his Majesty out to
-see it, and we reasoned much thereupon. He again spoke
-of my ‘Dædalus,’ and remarked upon my not continuing
-it; for which I pleaded want of means. This he does not
-like to hear of; so I hope to have some assistance shortly.”
-But assistance did not come, and “Dædalus” went the way
-of many such undertakings. Talking of mathematics one
-day, Charles remarked that “he who knew nothing of mathematics,
-did not deserve to be considered a rational man;”
-a sentiment which Swedenborg thought “truly worthy of a
-king.”<a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a></p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_31"></a>[31]</span></p>
-
-<p>Charles XII. was now engaged in the siege of Frederickshall,
-and Swedenborg’s aid was called in. He very ingeniously<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_32"></a>[32]</span>
-planned rolling machines, by which two galleys, five
-large boats, and a sloop, were conveyed from Stromstadt to<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_33"></a>[33]</span>
-Iderfjol, overland; a distance of fourteen miles. Under
-cover of these vessels, Charles was enabled to transport his
-heavy artillery under the very walls of Frederickshall; but
-it availed little, for at the siege of this town, on November
-30, 1718, (old style,) this inveterate warrior received the
-fatal blow which ended his troublous and eventful career.
-He was struck in the head with a cannon ball, and though
-death must have been instantaneous, he was found with his
-right hand firmly grasping the handle of his sword; so
-prompt was he to put himself in an attitude of defence.</p>
-
-<div class="poetry-container">
-<div class="poetry">
- <div class="stanza">
- <div class="verse indent0">“His fall was destined to a barren strand,</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">A petty fortress and a dubious hand;</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">He left a name at which the world grew pale,</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">To point a moral or adorn a tale.”</div>
- </div>
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<p>In 1719 the Swedberg family were ennobled by Queen
-Ulrica Eleonora, and Swedenborg from that time took his
-place with the nobles of the equestrian order, in the triennial
-Assemblies of the States. This distinction conferred little
-else than a change of name. He was neither a Count nor a
-Baron, as has very commonly been supposed.</p>
-
-<p>Emanuel Swedenborg was rapidly winning for himself the
-name of a deep thinker and a ready writer. In 1717 he
-published “An Introduction to Algebra,” under the title of
-“The Art of the Rules.” It was highly praised for its
-clearness, and the order and force of its examples. The first
-portion of the work, however, was all that was published.
-The second, containing the first account given in Sweden
-of the differential and integral calculus, still remains in MS.
-His second publication this year was, “Attempts to find the
-Longitude of Places by Lunar Observations.” Both works
-were written in Swedish.</p>
-
-<p>In 1719 four works proceeded from his increasingly fertile
-pen. “A Proposal for a Decimal System of Money and
-Measures;” “A Treatise on the Motion and Position of the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_34"></a>[34]</span>
-Earth and Planets;” “Proofs derived from Appearances in
-Sweden, of the Depth of the Sea, and the greater Force of
-the Tides in the Ancient World;” and “On Docks, Sluices,
-and Salt Works.”</p>
-
-<p>His work on the Decimal system of coinage and measures
-was republished in 1795. Swedenborg’s ideas on this and
-most other subjects were far ahead of the times in which he
-lived. In one of his letters he thus alludes to the discouragements
-he met with on this account. “It is a little discouraging
-to me to be advised to relinquish my views, as among
-the novelties the country can not bear. For my part, I
-desire all possible novelties; aye, a novelty for every day in
-the year; for in every age there is an abundance of persons
-who follow the beaten track, and remain in the old way;
-while there are not more than from six to ten in a century
-who bring forward innovations founded on argument and
-reason.”</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_35"></a>[35]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III.</h2>
-
-<p><i>Travels again—Publishes five Scientific Pamphlets and “Miscellaneous
-Observations”—Returns Home and enters on the duty of his
-Assessorship—Writes his “Opera Philosophica et Mineralia,” and
-goes abroad to publish it.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>In the spring of 1721, Swedenborg visited Holland a
-second time, and chose Amsterdam as a place of publication
-for the following five little works:—“Some Specimens of a
-Work on the Principles of Natural Philosophy, comprising
-New Attempts to Explain the Phenomena of Chemistry and
-Physics by Geometry;” “New Observations and Discoveries
-respecting Iron and Fire, and particularly respecting the
-Elemental Nature of Fire, together with a new construction
-of Stoves;” “A New Method of finding the Longitude of
-Places, on Land or at Sea, by Lunar Observations;” “A
-New Mechanical Plan of constructing Docks and Dykes;”
-and “A Mode of Discovering the Powers of Vessels by the
-application of Mechanical Principles.”</p>
-
-<p>The titles of these pamphlets prove that their author was
-no ordinary man. But the publication of them was not his
-only object in this visit to the continent. It was his desire
-to improve his practical knowledge of mining, to enable him
-the better to fulfill his duties as Assessor. For this purpose
-he left Amsterdam for Leipsic, passing through Aix-la-Chapelle,
-Liege, and Cologne, and visiting the different
-mines and smelting works which lay in his route. At
-Leipsic he published, in 1722, “Miscellaneous Observations
-connected with the Physical Sciences,” Parts I. to III.; and<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_36"></a>[36]</span>
-at Hamburg, in the same year, Part IV., principally on
-minerals, iron, and the stalactites in Beaumann’s cavern.
-The reigning Duke of Brunswick, Louis Rudolph, most
-hospitably received Swedenborg, defrayed his traveling
-expenses, and on his departure, testified his admiration of
-the young savant by presenting him with a gold medallion,
-and a weighty silver goblet. In return for these favors,
-Swedenborg dedicated Part IV. of his “Miscellaneous Observations”
-to him.</p>
-
-<p>In speaking of the foregoing works, it is difficult, in the
-few words to which we must limit ourselves, to do them the
-justice which their originality and daring speculation deserve.
-As Wilkinson remarks, “the fortress of mineral truth was
-the first which he approached, and with the most guarded
-preparation. His method was furnished by geometry and
-mechanics; the laws of the pure sciences were to be the
-interpreters of the facts of chemistry and physics. The
-beginning of nature, says he, is identical with the beginning
-of geometry; the origin of natural particles is due to mathematical
-points, just as is the origin of lines, forms, and the
-whole of geometry: because everything in nature is geometrical,
-everything in geometry is natural. Carrying out this
-theory, he seeks to define the laws of chemical essence and
-combination, by the truths of mathematics.” Mr. Strutt,
-the translator of these works into English, says: “This
-extraordinary attempt to bring invisible things to light, has
-been thoroughly justified by the success which has attended
-Dalton’s hypothesis, in an age better prepared for its application;
-and by the equally remarkable fact that the definitions
-given of solids, acids, and alkalies, have gradually
-approximated very near indeed to those which result from
-Swedenborg’s hypothesis. We say nothing here of a latent
-connection between the principle on which it is founded, and
-some of the results obtained by Berzelius, whose fame, as a<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_37"></a>[37]</span>
-chemist, is as wide as the civilized world.” It need only be
-added that M. Dumas, the French chemist, ascribes to these
-works by Swedenborg, the origin of the modern science
-of crystallography. He says, “It is to him we are indebted
-for the first idea of making cubes, tetrahedrons,
-pyramids, and the different crystalline forms, by the
-grouping of spherical particles; and it is an idea which
-has been renewed by several distinguished men, Wollaston
-in particular.”</p>
-
-<p>After an absence of fifteen months, Swedenborg returned
-to his home in Stockholm, at midsummer, 1722. He now
-for the first time entered fully upon the duties of his Assessorship;
-having deferred doing so until his knowledge of
-metallurgy had become sufficiently practical and extensive.
-At this time he published an anonymous pamphlet “On the
-Depreciation and Rise of the Swedish Currency.” The
-currency seems to have been a favorite subject with Swedenborg;
-and in his senatorial capacity, it engaged much of
-his attention. The pamphlet seems to have been much
-thought of, for we find that it was republished at Upsal
-in 1771. There are few productions of this kind that
-will endure a revival forty-nine years after their first publication.</p>
-
-<p>The tenor of Swedenborg’s life for eleven years after this,
-seems to have flowed quietly on in the regular fulfilment of
-the duties of his office. It may be supposed that he had become
-tired of writing and publishing scientific works, and
-that for a time he wished to rest from this kind of labor.
-His abilities were appreciated by his countrymen, for we
-find that he was solicited to accept the Professorship of
-mathematics in the University of Upsal, in 1724. He declined
-the honor. It appears that he had a distaste for the
-unpractical and merely speculative character of the pure
-mathematician. We find him writing to his brother-in-law<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_38"></a>[38]</span>
-in this strain:—“I wonder at Messieurs the mathematicians
-having lost all heart and spirit to realize that fine design of
-yours for an astronomical observatory. It is the fatality of
-mathematicians to remain chiefly in theory. I have often
-thought it would be a capital thing, if, to each ten mathematicians,
-one good practical man were added, to lead the
-rest to market: he would be of more use and mark than all
-the ten.” In 1729, Swedenborg became a member of the
-Royal Academy of Science at Stockholm.</p>
-
-<p>Discontinuing the pamphlet style of publication, Swedenborg
-now centered his thoughts upon the production of a
-much larger and more laborious work than he had hitherto
-attempted. It was entitled “Opera Philosophica et Mineralia.”
-In order to secure its proper publication, he went
-abroad, for the third time, in May, 1733. After spending
-five months in Germany, seeing everything note-worthy, he
-commenced the printing of his work at Leipsic, in the month
-of October. In the course of the year 1734, the whole was
-finished in three handsome folio volumes, enriched with numerous
-copper-plates, and an engraved likeness of the
-author. At this time he was again a visitor at the court of
-the Duke of Brunswick, who munificently defrayed the cost
-of his expensive publication. The volumes were published
-at Leipsic and Dresden.</p>
-
-<p>At the same time he issued a little work called “A Philosophical
-Argument on the Infinite, and the Final Cause of
-Creation; and on the Mechanism of the Intercourse between
-the Soul and the Body.” It may be regarded as a supplement
-to the foregoing.</p>
-
-<p>His work being finished, he left Leipsic for Cassel, and
-passing homewards through Gotha, Brunswick, and Hamburg,
-arrived at Stockholm in July, 1734. It is to be remembered
-that in this journey he had still the duties of his<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_39"></a>[39]</span>
-office in view. He visited mines everywhere, studied their
-modes of working, and sought continually to make himself
-useful to his country.</p>
-
-<p>It now becomes necessary to speak of his great volumes
-of philosophical and mineral works.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_40"></a>[40]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Opera Philosophica et Mineralia.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>In attempting to give the reader an idea of the contents
-and aims of this great work, within the compass of a few
-paragraphs, one feels extreme difficulty in knowing where
-or how to begin. It starts so many topics, is so full of the
-deepest scientific truth, speculates so boldly, and reaches to
-such heights of subtle thought, that we must necessarily confine
-ourselves to a very superficial view, and the enumeration
-of a few of its prominent features.</p>
-
-<p>As before said, the work occupies three large folio volumes.
-Of the second and third of these, it does not lie in our province
-to say much. Both are strictly practical works; one
-on iron, and the other on copper and brass. They are evidences
-of Swedenborg’s ardent devotion to the duties of his
-office; and as a testimony to the worth of the books themselves,
-it need only be said, that portions of them have been
-repeatedly reprinted, and that they are held in high estimation
-by those who study metallurgy as a science, or follow it
-as a profession. The publication of the secrets of trade and
-manufacture in these volumes, was not relished by the narrow-minded
-and selfish. Of such the author observes:—“There
-are persons who love to hold their knowledge for
-themselves alone, and to be the reputed possessors and guardians
-of secrets. People of this kind grudge the public
-everything, and if any discovery, by which art and science
-will be benefited, comes to light, they regard it askance, with<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_41"></a>[41]</span>
-scowling visages, and probably denounce the discoverer as a
-babbler who lets out mysteries. But why should such secrets
-be grudged to the public? Why withhold from this
-enlightened age? Whatever is worthy to be known, should
-by all means be brought to the great and general market of
-the world. Unless we do this, we can neither grow wiser
-nor happier with time.” These are true, liberal, and noble
-words.</p>
-
-<p>But it is the first volume which is the greatest and most
-important of the three. It has recently been translated into
-English by the Rev. Augustus Clissold, and published in
-two considerable octavos. It is entitled “Principia; or the
-First Principles of Natural Things, being New Attempts
-toward a Philosophical Explanation of the Elementary
-World.” In this volume an attempt is made to explain the
-generation of the elements, the creation of matter, and the
-nature of the occult forces playing within nature. To
-pronounce an absolute opinion upon such a work would
-be highly hazardous; for positive science at present,
-affords no sufficient data to test many of its highest
-reasonings. So far, however, as such tests have been granted,
-they serve to manifest the fact that among speculative
-natural philosophers, Swedenborg is second to none. Gœrres,
-an eminent German philosopher, speaking of the “Principia,”
-remarks:—“It is a production indicative of profound
-thought in all its parts, and not unworthy of being placed by
-the side of Newton’s mathematical ‘Principia of Natural
-Philosophy.’” We will now adduce a few proofs of the
-truth of this assertion.</p>
-
-<p>Humboldt, in his “Kosmos,” remarks: “That great and
-enthusiastic although cautious observer, Sir William Herschel,
-was the first to sound the depths of heaven, in order
-to determine the limits and form of the starry system we
-inhabit.” The discovery of the place of our sun and system<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_42"></a>[42]</span>
-in the Milky Way, is certainly due to Herschel, but Swedenborg
-has a prior claim to the honor. In the “Principia,”
-written four years before Herschel was born, the statement
-of our sun’s position in the heavens was explicitly made,
-with the method by which the fact was observed. But this
-is not all. The changes observed in the planetary orbits,
-seemed at one time to warrant the belief in a final destruction
-of all things through the falling of creation into chaos.
-After awhile, however, La Grange brought forward his
-beautiful theory, by which was established the doctrine, that
-though the solar system is liable to certain mutations in the
-form and eccentricity of its orbits in very long periods, yet
-in consequence of a certain relation which prevails in the
-system, between the masses, orbital axes, and eccentricities,
-in time all orbits return again to what they originally were,
-oscillating between very narrow limits. This discovery of a
-cyclar return, confirmed by the most eminent astronomers,
-is pronounced by Professor Playfair to be, “next to Newton’s
-discovery of the elliptical orbits of the planets,—without
-doubt the noblest truth in physical astronomy.” This discovery
-has also to be claimed for Swedenborg. In his
-“Principia,” the fact of this cyclar mutation and return of
-the planets to order, is repeatedly stated, and with great
-accuracy and plainness. Want of space alone forbids several
-quotations in proof. It need only be noted that the “Principia”
-was published forty-four years before La Grange announced
-his famous theory. Again, the doctrine of the
-translatory or progressive motion of the stars along the
-Milky Way, and their streaming out at the northern end,
-and in at the southern; diverging at the northern end in
-every direction, while at the southern end they converge at
-every point,—one of the most magnificent truths of modern
-astronomy,—is clearly set forth in this wonderful work of
-Swedenborg’s, years before the full fact had dawned upon<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_43"></a>[43]</span>
-the scientific world. Again, the sublime doctrine of the
-cosmical arrangement of the stars, or of the clustering of
-stars into distinct systems, forming starry systems, as planets
-do solar systems, generally attributed to Kant, Mitchell, and
-one or two others, was promulgated by Swedenborg in the
-“Principia,” when Kant, the first of the acknowledged propounders
-of the theory, was a boy of ten years of age. The
-first enunciation of the nebular hypothesis, is also to be referred
-to Swedenborg’s “Principia.” Indeed La Place, to
-whom the hypothesis is generally attributed, indirectly owed
-some of his ideas on the subject to Swedenborg. La Place
-owned that Buffon was the first that suggested the theory of
-the origin of the planets and their satellites from the sun.
-Now Buffon was acquainted with Swedenborg’s “Principia,”
-as is evident from the fact that an eminent London bookseller
-recently sold a copy of the “Principia” containing
-Buffon’s autograph.<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> It need only be added, that, fifteen
-years before Buffon published his theory, and seventy-five
-years before La Place offered his own to the public, Swedenborg
-had propounded his version of the nebular hypothesis
-in the “Principia.” It is true that La Place and Swedenborg
-differ on several points; but recent science and experiment
-have tended to prove that, wherein they differ, Swedenborg’s
-theories are the most accurate.</p>
-
-<p>While advancing these high claims for Swedenborg, in
-astronomical science and theory, it is but right to remove
-from the public mind an erroneous idea, which, like his
-titles of Baron and Count, has no foundation in fact. We
-allude to his common repute as the announcer of the existence
-of the seventh planet, Uranus, discovered by Herschel
-in 1781. That he announced the existence of this planet
-long before its actual discovery, has been stated innumerable<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_44"></a>[44]</span>
-times, at home and abroad; and Emerson in his lecture on
-the Mystic, takes opportunity to be witty in regretting that
-he did not discover the eighth. The mistake has arisen from
-Swedenborg’s talking of a seventh planet in “The Worship
-and Love of God,” a book of his yet to be noticed. Now
-the belief in the existence of a seventh planet was entertained
-by most of the astronomers of his day, and even so
-far back as Kepler, in 1584. Swedenborg, in speaking as
-he did, only expressed a general idea. Astronomers observing
-the wide space between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter
-conjectured that some planet must roll between. The after
-discovery of numerous asteroids between these orbits, gave
-some show of truth to their conjectures. It was of this supposed
-planet between Mars and Jupiter, and not of Uranus,
-(afterwards discovered by Sir William Herschel,) that Swedenborg
-spoke.</p>
-
-<p>In magnetism, as in astronomy, the “Principia” is no
-less rich in original thought and discovery. It was not
-until the close of the eighteenth century that the position
-of the magnetic equator was discovered to be different from
-that of the geographical. After observations confirmed the
-fact that the mean latitudinal positions of the magnetic poles
-and equators, are identical with those of the earth’s ecliptic
-and ecliptical poles. This fact, over which there has been
-much congratulation, was set forth in the “Principia” many
-years before it was confirmed by actual observation. Again,
-the fact that the southern magnetic pole has a longer axis
-from the center of the magnetic equator, than the northern,
-and hence occupies a higher latitudinal position; and, as a
-consequence, that the revolution of the north magnetic pole
-is quicker than that of the southern; also that the south
-magnetic pole possesses a greater attractive force than the
-north,—facts not suspected till the investigations of Hansteen
-in 1819, and only fully confirmed by observation very<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_45"></a>[45]</span>
-recently,—were all proclaimed in the “Principia” nearly a
-century before positive science had embraced them in her
-domain. Swedenborg also takes precedence of all other
-discoverers in the announcement of the identity of the
-magnetic streams forming the aurora, and those influencing
-the magnetic needle. So full is the “Principia” of truths
-respecting magnetism,—which the world generally supposes
-to be a novelty of the present day—that we could not
-imagine a greater pleasure or surprise awaiting any one
-devoted to the prosecution of magnetic science, than the
-perusal of this commonly supposed old-fashioned and antiquated
-“Principia” of speculative science.</p>
-
-<p>We will now say a few words on the great chemical truths
-which the “Principia” revealed. In 1734, not a whisper
-had been breathed regarding the composite nature of the
-atmosphere. The earliest date which can be assigned for
-the practical discovery of the two-fold nature of atmospheric
-air, is 1772-4, the date of Priestley’s celebrated experiments.
-But we find in the “Principia,” that Swedenborg sets forth
-the following facts:—that pure and dry atmospheric air is a
-compound of two constituents; that these constituents are
-combined in unequal proportions; that the element greatest
-in quantity is the extinguisher of combustion; and lastly,
-that the element greatest in quantity is a constituent of
-water as well as of air. The merest tyro in science will, at
-a glance, perceive the importance and extent of ground
-which these propositions cover, and how profound must have
-been that genius, which, in the midst of the deepest scientific
-darkness, could draw from nature these deep and choice
-truths. But this was not all. Water as well as air yielded
-to him the secret of its constitution. In Swedenborg’s day,
-the whole world thought and spoke of water as an element,
-and even after the composite nature of air was revealed,
-water maintained its elemental character up to 1783, when<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_46"></a>[46]</span>
-the discovery was almost simultaneously made by Watt,
-Priestley, Cavendish, and Lavoisier, that water, like air, is
-a result of the combination of two gases. Now in the
-“Principia,” written fifty years before, we are expressly told
-that pure water is a compound substance, and the particulars
-and quantities of the two elements in its composition are
-correctly given. There are many other truths in modern
-science which the “Principia” anticipates; such as the atomic
-theory, and the identity of electricity and lightning; but we
-must draw to a close. Enough has been said to show the
-high merits of the book, and to prove how worthy it is of the
-study and attention of all true lovers of science.</p>
-
-<p>The publication of the “Principia” gained for its author
-great reputation, and his friendship and correspondence
-were eagerly courted by all the philosophers of his day. In
-December, 1734, the Academy of Sciences at St. Petersburg
-appointed him one of their corresponding members. The
-Pope honored the work by placing it in that noble catalogue
-of books, the Index Expurgatorius, in 1739.</p>
-
-<p>It may be very pertinently asked, how it happens that a
-work abounding in such important doctrines and theories
-should be so little known. The neglect is easily accounted
-for in the great subsequent fame of its author as a religious
-visionary. His later reputation effectually out-shone that
-which he so deservedly won in his younger days; and few,
-even of his own disciples, until recently, thought of lifting
-from the dusty shelves those great books of scientific theory,
-which, of themselves, established for their author a place
-among the greatest of men. The “Principia,” as its translator
-truly says, “is a book for the future;” and taking
-these words in their full import, it would be hardly possible
-to pronounce a higher panegyric.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_47"></a>[47]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Doings and Travels.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>From 1734 to 1736, Swedenborg remained at home. In
-July, 1735, his father died; and a year after, Swedenborg
-went abroad, as he states in his diary, “for a sojourn of
-three or four years, to write and publish a certain book.”
-During his absence he resigned half of his official salary to
-his substitutes. His father having left him some money, he
-was the better able to do so. He journeyed through Denmark,
-Hanover, and Holland, and arrived at Rotterdam
-during the fair. Observing the amusements of the people,
-mountebanks, shows, etc., he took occasion to moralize thus
-upon the character and prosperity of the Dutch. “Here at
-Rotterdam, it has suggested itself to me to inquire why it
-is that God has blessed a people so barbarous and boorish as
-the Dutch, with such a fertile and luxuriant soil; that He
-has preserved them, for so long a course of years, from all
-misfortune; that He has raised them up in commerce above
-all other nations; and made their provinces the mart and
-emporium of the wealth of Europe and the world. On
-consideration, the first and principal cause of these circumstances
-appears to be, that Holland is a republic, which
-form of government is more pleasing to God than an absolute
-monarchy. In a republic, no veneration or worship is
-paid to any man, but the highest and lowest think themselves
-equal to kings and emperors; as may be seen from the
-characteristic bearing of every one in Holland. The only<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_48"></a>[48]</span>
-one whom they worship is God. And when God alone is
-worshiped, and men are not adored instead of Him, such
-worship is most acceptable to Him. Then again, in Holland,
-there is the greatest liberty. None are slaves, but all are as
-lords and masters under the government of the most high
-God; and the consequence is, that they do not depress their
-manliness either by shame or fear, but always preserve a
-firm and sound mind in a sound body; and with a free
-spirit, and an erect countenance, commit themselves and
-their property to God, who alone ought to govern all things.
-It is not so in absolute monarchies, where men are educated
-to simulation and dissimulation; where they learn to have
-one thing concealed in the breast, and to bring forth another
-upon the tongue; where their minds, by inveterate custom,
-become so false and counterfeit, that, in divine worship itself,
-their words differ from their thoughts, and they proffer their
-flattery and deceit to God himself, which certainly must be
-most displeasing to Him. This seems to be the reason why
-the Dutch are more prosperous in their undertakings than
-other nations.” Then, with rare discrimination, he adds,
-“but their worshiping mammon as a Deity, and caring for
-nothing but gold, is a thing which is not compatible with
-long prosperity.” The silent and uninfluential place which
-Holland now fills in Europe, places the seal of truth on these
-quiet lines.</p>
-
-<p>The Roman Catholic Church seems to have attracted
-much of his attention in his travels, and the grossness and
-sensuality of its priesthood were strongly remarked upon.
-“The monks,” says he, “at Roye, are fat and corpulent, and
-an army of such fellows might be banished without loss to
-the State. They fill their bellies, take all they can get, and
-give the poor nothing but fine words and blessings; and yet
-they are willing to take from the poor all their substance for
-nothing. What is the good of bare-footed Franciscans?”<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_49"></a>[49]</span>
-In Paris, he spent a year and a half. There also he was
-amazed at the clerical riot and corruption. “It is found,”
-he observes, “that the tax which they term the dixièmes,
-yields annually thirty-two millions sterling; and that the
-Parisians spend two-thirds of this amount over their own
-city. One-fifth of the whole possessions of the kingdom is
-in the hands of the clerical order. If this condition of
-things last long, the ruin of the empire will be speedy.”
-He little dreamed of the fearful verification which these
-words would receive.</p>
-
-<p>His journal in Paris reveals the fact of his hearty enjoyment
-of sight-seeing and amusements. Visits to churches,
-monasteries, palaces, gardens, museums, and theatres, evidence
-with what zest he drank the cup of life, and with what
-interest he looked upon men and their affairs. In this respect
-we do well to compare Swedenborg with many whom
-the world in its ignorance associate with him. At no period
-of his life was he a cold self-righteous ascetic, looking abroad
-upon men with a bitter and accusing scowl. At no time did
-he insult his Maker with upbraidings that his fate was to
-live in an evil world, and with a wicked generation. He
-received life with thankfulness, partook temperately of all
-its lawful pleasures, did his duty, and took care while living
-with the world to keep himself unspotted from its evil.
-This social discipline was one of the Divine means by which
-he was fitted for the full performance of his future mission.</p>
-
-<p>We are not informed of the nature of the work which he
-at this time went abroad to write and publish. From his
-manuscripts, however, it appears that he was preparing materials
-and disciplining his mind for his great work, the
-“Animal Kingdom,” by writing short papers on various
-physiological subjects. Many of these papers have been
-translated and published under the title of “Posthumous
-Tracts.”</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_50"></a>[50]</span></p>
-
-<p>Leaving Paris in March, 1738, Swedenborg directed his
-steps toward Italy, and after visiting its principal cities,
-arrived at Rome on the 25th September. Mr. Rich, in his
-“Biography of Swedenborg,” remarks,—“This visit should
-be a memorable one, for it brought the church of the past
-and the future into a singular communion with each other;—Rome
-in the still atmosphere and fading light of autumn,
-with all its trophies of Pagan art, and its hoary traditions;
-and Swedenborg, the predestined Seer of the last ages, whose
-eye was just kindling with the light of inspiration. We
-should lose all faith in the instinctive prescience of the human
-spirit when great events are at hand, if we might not
-believe that a presentiment of something in the shadowy
-distance, connecting his future with the strange mystery of
-the city, did not cross, for a moment, the mind of Swedenborg,
-when he entered the once holy and revered metropolis
-of the faith.”</p>
-
-<p>After a sojourn of five months, Swedenborg left Rome on
-the 15th of February, 1739, varying his homeward route.
-His journal from the 17th of March, 1739, when he was at
-Genoa, is a blank, and his after wanderings we can only
-conjecture. “It is most probable,” says Wilkinson, “that
-he deposited the manuscript of the “Economy of the Animal
-Kingdom,” at Amsterdam, on his way from Leipsic to
-Sweden, in 1740; that he lived in his own country from
-1740 or 1741 till 1744, and in the latter year went again to
-Holland, and from thence came to England, where we meet
-him in 1745.”</p>
-
-<p>In 1740-41, Swedenborg published at Amsterdam his
-“Economy of the Animal Kingdom;” and in 1744-45, the
-“Animal Kingdom,” Parts I. and II. at the Hague, and
-Part III. in London.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_51"></a>[51]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>The “Economy of the Animal Kingdom,” and the “Animal
-Kingdom.”</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>In the “Animal Kingdom,” Swedenborg referred solely to
-the human body, it being the microcosm, or representative
-of all inferior systems. In the “Economy of the Animal
-Kingdom,” he treats of the blood, and the organs which
-contain it; the coincidence of the motion of the brain with
-the respiration of the lungs; and of the human soul. The
-method pursued in this work is admirable. A careful series
-of extracts, containing facts from the best anatomists, is
-prefixed to each chapter, and thence is deduced the author’s
-theory. It would be very difficult indeed to present, in an
-abstract, the substance of these quotations, and without this,
-(which would be inconsistent with our limits,) the theories
-could not be fairly understood or appreciated. His demonstration
-of the coincidence of the motion of the brain with
-the respiration of the lungs, is well worthy of notice. Wilkinson,
-speaking of this in his “Biography of Swedenborg,”
-says: “Let any reader think for a moment of what he
-experiences when he breathes, and attends to the act. He
-will find that his whole frame heaves and subsides at the
-time; face, chest, stomach, and limbs, are all actuated by
-his respiration. His sense is, that not only his lungs but his
-entire body breathes. Now mark what Swedenborg elicited
-from this fact. If the whole man breathes or heaves, so also
-do the organs which he contains, for they are necessarily
-drawn outwards by the rising of the surface; therefore they<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_52"></a>[52]</span>
-all breathe. What do they breathe? Two elements are
-omnipresent in them, the blood-vessels and the nerves; the
-one giving them pabulum, the other life. They draw then
-into themselves blood, and life or nervous spirit. Each does
-this according to its own form; each, therefore, has a free
-individuality like the whole man; each takes its food, the
-blood, when it chooses; each wills into itself the life according
-to its desires. The man is made up of manlike parts; his
-freedom is an aggregate of a host of atomic, organical
-freedoms. The heart does not cram them with its blood,
-but each, like the man itself, takes what it thinks right.</p>
-
-<p>“But, furthermore, thought commences and corresponds
-with respiration. The reader has before attended to the
-presence of the heaving over the body; now let him <i>feel his
-thoughts</i>, and he will see that they too heave with the mass.
-When he entertains a long thought he draws a long breath;
-when he thinks quickly, his breath vibrates with rapid
-alternations; when the tempest of anger shakes his mind, his
-breath is tumultuous; when his soul is deep and tranquil, so
-is his respiration; when success inflates him, his lungs are as
-tumid as his conceits. Let him make trial of the contrary:
-let him endeavor to think in long stretches at the same time
-that he breathes in fits, and he will find that it is impossible;
-that in this case the chopping lungs will needs mince his
-thoughts. Now the mind dwells in the brain, and it is the
-brain, therefore, which shares the varying fortunes of the
-breathing. It is strange that this correspondence between
-the states of the brain or mind, and the lungs, has not been
-admitted into science; for it holds in every case, at every
-moment. In truth it is so unfailing, and so near to the
-center of sense, that this has made it difficult to regard it as
-an object; for if you only try to think upon the breathing,
-in consequence of the fixation of thought, you stop the
-breath that very moment, and only recommence it when the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_53"></a>[53]</span>
-thought can no longer hold, that is to say, when the brain
-has need to expire. Now Swedenborg, with amazing observation
-and sagacity, has made a regular study of this ratio
-between the respiration and the thoughts and emotions; he
-shows in detail that the two correspond exactly, and moreover
-that their correspondence is one of the long-sought links
-between the soul and the body, whereby every thought is
-represented and carried out momentaneously in the expanse
-of the human frame. It is difficult to give a more plain or
-excellent reason of the tie between the body and the soul,
-than that the latter finds the body absolutely to its mind;
-while on the other hand, the living body clings to the soul,
-because it wants a friendly superior life to infuse and direct
-its life.”</p>
-
-<p>The “Animal Kingdom,” written after the same plan as
-the “Economy,” treats of the organs of the abdomen, of those
-of the chest, and of the skin. Swedenborg, in setting forth
-his plan of operation, in which he announces his intention to
-examine, physically and philosophically, the whole anatomy
-of the body, and lastly of the soul, and of its state in the
-body, says: “From this summary or plan, the reader may
-see that the end I propose to myself in the work, is a
-knowledge of the soul, since this knowledge will constitute
-the crown of my studies. This, then, my labors intend, and
-thither they aim. To accomplish this grand end, I enter the
-circus, designing to consider and examine thoroughly the
-whole world of microcosm which the soul inhabits; for I
-think it vain to seek her anywhere but in her own kingdom.
-I am, therefore, resolved to allow myself no respite, until I
-have run through the whole field to the very goal, or until
-I have traversed the universal animal kingdom to the soul.
-Thus I hope that by bending my course inward continually,
-I shall open all the doors that lead to her, and at length
-contemplate the soul herself, by the Divine permission.”<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_54"></a>[54]</span>
-One of his manuscripts repeats this design in these words:
-“I have gone through anatomy with the single end of investigating
-the soul. It will be a satisfaction to me if my labors
-be of any use to the anatomical and medical world, but a
-still greater satisfaction if I afford any light towards the
-investigation of the soul.”</p>
-
-<p>In striving to compass such high spiritual knowledge, by
-merely natural means, he necessarily failed. In one of his
-books, written several years after, when a brighter light had
-dawned upon his mind, he says: “Many in the learned world
-have laboured in investigating the soul, but as they knew
-nothing of the spiritual world, and of the state of man after
-death, they could not do otherwise than construct hypotheses,
-not respecting the soul’s nature, or its operation on the body.
-Of the soul’s nature, they could have no other idea than as
-of something most pure in ether, and of its continent as of
-ether. Now having such a conception of the soul, and yet
-knowing that the soul acts on the body, and produces everything
-in it that has relation to sense and motion, therefore
-they labored, as we before observed, to investigate the
-soul’s operation on the body, which some said was effected
-by influx, and some by harmony. But these means discovered
-nothing in which the mind desirous of seeing the
-ground of things, can acquiesce.” We have in these sentences
-the cause of the fruitlessness of his own labors at
-this period, in their highest aims. They formed, however,
-a part of that providential discipline which was fitting him
-for his future office.</p>
-
-<p>Fruitless though these works necessarily were, in their
-highest aim, yet in lower ends they are treasure-houses of
-thought and suggestion. Taking for his basis the dry facts
-of the anatomists, he proceeds to clothe them with life and
-comeliness. He shows how part is bound to part in the
-human system, and fills the cold details of science with a<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_55"></a>[55]</span>
-warm and human interest. Emerson well says: “The
-‘Animal Kingdom’ is a book of wonderful merits. It
-was written with the highest end, to put science and
-soul, so long estranged from each other, at one again. It
-was the anatomist’s account of the human body in the
-highest style of poetry; and nothing can exceed the bold
-and brilliant treatment of a subject usually so dry and
-repulsive.”</p>
-
-<p>It was hardly possible for books to be ushered into the
-world to die more quietly than did these physiological
-treatises. Slightly noticed in a few catalogues and reviews
-of that day, they were laid on the shelf, and reposed in dust
-and forgetfulness for a full century. Called to other thoughts
-and higher labors, their author was arrested midway in his
-plans; and ceasing to exist behind his books, and by his
-life, conversation, and activity, to keep up the public interest,
-the world soon forgot their existence. But their worth has
-been their preservative; and now we behold their resurrection,
-and slow, but certain, growth into acceptance and
-fame. Translated by Wilkinson, and enriched by him with
-prefaces which Emerson describes as “throwing all the
-contemporary philosophy of England into the shade,” they
-are now placed before the world, and, in their excellence
-serve to manifest the profound understanding and genius
-of their author.</p>
-
-<p>In 1745, Swedenborg terminated his long series of scientific
-works, by the publication, in London, of “The Worship and
-Love of God.” This book is an embodiment, in a story,
-of its author’s scientific doctrines. In a connected narrative,
-it treats of the origin of the earth, the birth, infancy, and
-love, of Adam; and of the soul in its state of integrity, in
-the image of God. It is a book of which little need be said,
-as it was probably written as much for an exercise of fancy,
-as with any serious intent. Cast into shade, as it is, by the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_56"></a>[56]</span>
-brighter light of his after knowledge, it remains to mark the
-point of intellectual development at which Swedenborg had
-at this time arrived; and in this respect it will always have
-a strong interest to those who delight in tracing the growth
-and education of his mind.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_57"></a>[57]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>His Life, as a Man of Science, ends.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>The biographer of Swedenborg can feel no difficulty in
-distributing under proper heads the principal events of his
-life. It divides itself so distinctly into two parts, at this
-juncture, that, between his past and his future there is what
-he himself would call a “discrete degree.”</p>
-
-<p>In 1745, when the merely scientific phase of Swedenborg’s
-life closed, he had arrived at the mature age of fifty-seven
-years. As we have seen, he had, from early manhood,
-united an active and practical, with a deeply philosophic,
-life. An earnest student of nature, he had never become so
-engrossed in thought as to forget the end of all thought—the
-improvement and the happiness of mankind. His long
-series of scientific works had gained him a wide-spread reputation,
-and wherever he went, he was hailed as a friend
-and brother by the thoughtful and philosophical. In Sweden,
-as before said, he was well connected; and had he been
-desirous to live at home, and immerse himself in the cares
-and politics of his country, he might have reached the highest
-offices and honors which royalty could confer. At the
-age of fifty-seven, with Swedenborg’s attainments, success,
-and fame, a worldly man might have been content. Such
-a one would, probably, have taken his ease, reposed upon
-the past, and have been content with the competence of
-comfort and reputation which he had attained. But Swedenborg
-was a man of a very different character. Love of<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_58"></a>[58]</span>
-ease formed no part of his constitution, and if he had not
-been led by the hand of Providence to the contemplation
-of the spiritual world and its glorious realities, he would, to
-the end of his life, have remained a zealous and single-eyed
-seeker after the truths of the natural world.</p>
-
-<p>The annals of science do not furnish an instance of
-any one who surpassed Swedenborg in that humility of
-spirit, and that simple desire for truth, which is the crowning
-grace and glory of the true philosopher. Although, at
-times, he propounded views which he knew were antagonistic
-to the ideas of some of the leading savans of his time,
-yet we never find him getting angry or attempting to scold
-the world into belief with him. He simply lays down what
-he believes to be the truth; and with the most charming
-modesty trusts for its acceptance among men, to its agreement
-with reason and facts. Full of this trustful spirit we
-find him saying in the “Principia:” “In writing the present
-work, I have not aimed at the applause of the learned world,
-nor at the acquisition of a name or popularity. To me, it
-is a matter of indifference whether I win the favorable opinion
-of every one, or of no one; whether I gain much or no
-commendation. Such things are not objects of regard to
-one whose mind is bent on truth and true philosophy.
-Should I, therefore, gain the assent or approbation of others,
-I shall receive it only as a confirmation of my having pursued
-the truth. I have no wish to persuade any one to lay
-aside the principles of those illustrious and talented authors
-who have adorned the world, and in place of their principles
-to adopt mine. For this reason it is, that I have not
-made mention so much as of one of them, or even hinted at
-his name, lest I should injure his feelings, or seem to impugn
-his sentiments, or to derogate from the praise which others
-bestow upon him. If the principles I have advanced have
-more of truth in them than those which are advocated by<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_59"></a>[59]</span>
-others; if they are truly philosophical, and accordant with
-the phenomena of nature, the assent of the public will follow
-in due time, of its own accord; and in this case should
-I fail to gain the assent of those whose minds, being prepossessed
-by other principles, can no longer exercise an impartial
-judgment, still I have those with me who are able to
-distinguish the true from the untrue, if not in the present,
-at least in some future age. Truth is unique, and will speak
-for itself. Should any one undertake to impugn my sentiments,
-I have no wish to oppose him; but in case he desire
-it, I shall be happy to explain my principles and my reasons
-more at large. What need, however, is there of words?
-Let the thing speak for itself. If what I have said be true,
-why should I be eager to defend it? Surely truth can defend
-itself. If what I have said be false, it would be a
-degrading and silly task to defend it. Why then should I
-make myself an enemy of any one, or place myself
-in opposition to any one?” And again, in the “Economy,”
-he remarks: “Of what consequence is it to me
-that I should persuade any one to embrace my opinions?
-Let his own reason persuade him. I do not undertake this
-work for the sake of honor or emolument; both of which I
-shun rather than seek, because they disquiet the mind, and
-because I am content with my lot; but for the sake of truth,
-which alone is immortal.” These are long extracts, but they
-are well worthy of citation, alike for their own intrinsic truth
-and beauty, and for the illustration they afford of the spirit
-and sentiments of their author.</p>
-
-<p>The little thought he gave in after years to his scientific
-writings, and the little care he seemed to have lest the world
-should forget them, is very evident from his subsequent
-writings, in which they are scarcely alluded to. Some of
-the friends he made in the latter portion of his life, appear
-to have had very faint ideas of the extent of his achievements<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_60"></a>[60]</span>
-in natural science. Count Hopken, a very intimate
-friend of his, for many years, remarks: “Swedenborg made
-surprising discoveries in anatomy, which are recorded somewhere
-in certain literary Transactions.” Thus it appears
-that he was entirely ignorant of the existence of Swedenborg’s
-great work, the “Animal Kingdom.” What stronger
-proof could be given than this, of the sincerity with which
-the foregoing extracts were penned, in which he commits
-his works to the care of the God of truth, in humble acquiescence
-in whatever verdict his justice might pronounce.</p>
-
-<p>Great and manifold were the merits of these scientific
-works; yet we should, perhaps, do well to look upon them,
-as their author seems to have done, as school-boy exercises.
-Through the severe training and development of the whole
-powers of his mind, by the composition of these works, his
-Divine Master was fitting him to gaze upon the awful realities
-of the spiritual world, and to become a worthy exponent
-of the hidden wisdom of the Holy Scripture.</p>
-
-<p>It must, necessarily, be a matter of interest with many to
-know what were the religious opinions of Swedenborg at this
-period of his history. Occupying himself so intensely with
-natural science, it was hardly to be expected that theology
-could receive much of his attention. Among his posthumous
-papers, however, we find a little treatise on faith and good
-works, in which he comes to the wise conclusion that “there
-is no love to God if there be none to the neighbor;” or that
-“there is no faith if there be no works;” and therefore, that
-“faith without works is a phrase involving a contradiction.”
-Throughout all his scientific writings we find a simple and
-open assent to the primary truths of religion, and a constant
-endeavor to confirm some truth of religious doctrine by the
-natural facts which came under his notice. His religious
-views up to this time were generally such as the Christian
-world held, with here and there a quiet dissent as to particular<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_61"></a>[61]</span>
-points, and a strong tendency to eschew the merely
-theoretical and mystical belief, for the practical and active.
-We have his own testimony to the fact, that dogmatic and
-systematic theology formed no part of his otherwise extensive
-reading; and thus he came to the study of the Word of
-God unperverted by the sophisms of creed-makers. Of the
-gentle and earnest piety of his soul, we have striking proof
-in his “Rules of Life:”</p>
-
-<p>1. Often to read and meditate on the Word of God.</p>
-
-<p>2. To submit everything to the will of Divine Providence.</p>
-
-<p>3. To observe in everything a propriety of behaviour, and
-to keep the conscience clear.</p>
-
-<p>4. To discharge with fidelity the functions of my employment,
-and the duties of my office, and to render myself in
-all things useful to society.</p>
-
-<p>More need not be said on this head than that he kept
-these vows.</p>
-
-<p>We now close the first book of Swedenborg’s life, and open
-the second. Emphatically his was a double life. So rich
-in thought and action were both parts, that either would
-have been reckoned sufficient to render him a remarkable
-man. The one life was an orderly and regular growth
-out of the other: the first was a providential preparation for
-the second. Carefully disciplined by thought and investigation
-in the outer world, through a long series of laborious
-years, the curtain which separated the seen from the unseen
-was, for him, drawn aside, and his prepared eyes saw in clear
-sunlight those mysteries of life and spirit, which the best and
-wisest of men have most ardently desired to see. Let us,
-then, leave Swedenborg the Man of Science, and turn to him
-as the Servant of the Lord Jesus Christ, the worthy exponent
-of the spiritual sense of the Word of God, and the announcer
-of the New Era in which reason and faith are to be at one,
-and men everywhere friends and brothers.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_62"></a>[62]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_VIII">CHAPTER VIII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>His Spiritual Sight opened, and the Conditions of his Seership.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>We will now proceed, without circumlocution, to lay before
-our readers, in all its fullness, the claim which Swedenborg
-made, at this period, to open intercourse with the spiritual
-world, under the sanction and protection of the Lord. This
-assumption runs through the whole of his after life, and
-without a clear idea of its nature and conditions, we shall be
-unable rightly to appreciate aught else that follows. In one of
-his letters, he says, “I have been called to a holy office by the
-Lord himself, who most graciously manifested himself to me,
-his servant, in the year 1743, when he opened my sight to a
-view of the spiritual world, and granted me the privilege of
-conversing with spirits and angels, which I enjoy to this day.
-From that time, I began to print and publish various arcana
-that have been seen by me, or revealed to me; as respecting
-heaven and hell, the state of man after death, the true worship
-of God, the spiritual sense of the Word, with many
-other most important matters conducive to salvation and
-true wisdom.” Again, in the preface to his work entitled,
-“Arcana Cœlestia,” he writes: “Of the Lord’s Divine mercy,
-it has been granted me now for several years to be constantly
-and uninterruptedly in company with spirits and angels,
-hearing them converse with each other, and conversing with
-them. Hence it has been permitted me to hear and see
-stupendous things in the other life, which have never before
-come to the knowledge of any man, nor entered his imagination.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_63"></a>[63]</span>
-I have there been instructed concerning different
-kinds of spirits, and the state of souls after death; concerning
-hell, or the lamentable state of the unfaithful; concerning
-heaven, or the most happy state of the faithful; and particularly
-concerning the doctrine of faith which is acknowledged
-throughout all heaven.”</p>
-
-<p>We are aware that these pretensions will be received by
-many with ridicule, and by some with contempt, arising
-from a distaste for spiritual subjects; while by a few they
-will be treated with respectful attention. All that we ask,
-is, a little patience; and to readers of every class, we would
-say,—Do not be hasty; do not prejudge the matter; condemn
-not till you are conversant with the whole circumstances
-of the case. Swedenborg’s claim, we admit, does appear
-startling; but to greet its announcement with the laugh
-of scepticism, and to deny its validity, as many do, without
-an attempt at examination, is anything but philosophical—is
-anything but righteous.</p>
-
-<p>No reader of this sketch can have failed to perceive the
-high philosophical genius, and perfect truthfulness of Swedenborg;
-and all must agree with us in believing that wilful
-deception was an impossibility with such a man. No
-explanation of what Swedenborg himself calls the opening
-of his spiritual sight, can be offered, that is more transparently
-ridiculous than that of imposture. The degree
-of vehemence with which some have preferred this charge
-against him, may be taken as an accurate index of their
-ignorance of the man, or of their inability to discern a
-truthful and earnest spirit.</p>
-
-<p>No denial of the possibility of such spiritual vision as is
-claimed by Swedenborg, can be accepted from the Christian.
-Such denial is alone the privilege of the professed materialist.
-We all know how much of our loved and common faith
-rests on claims that are quite as startling as those of Swedenborg.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_64"></a>[64]</span>
-From the visions of Abraham to those of John in
-Patmos, the whole Scriptural narrative is interwoven with
-supernatural incident. Now, how is it that we yield such
-ready faith to whatever is related in Scripture, however
-marvelous, and have so much wonder to spare over the
-unbelieving Jews? The Rev. O. Prescott Hiller, in a short
-memoir of Swedenborg, prefixed to a collection of “Gems”
-from his writings, has some very apposite remarks on this
-subject. He says: “Swedenborg states that there are three
-heavens; so does Paul, for he speaks of the ‘third heaven.’
-Swedenborg affirms, calmly, that his spiritual senses were
-opened and elevated in such a manner that he might have a
-perception of that state of existence, and see and hear what
-is there. So does Paul. Swedenborg states that he had, in
-spirit, been permitted to behold the Lord: so does Paul:—‘Have
-I not seen,’ said he, ‘Jesus Christ our Lord?’ (1 Cor.
-ix. 1.) Thus parallel are the cases. But, exclaims the
-prejudiced observer: ‘Paul! Paul! Paul was an apostle!
-Paul was one of the founders of the Christian Church!
-Paul lived eighteen hundred years ago! There are no
-visions now-a-days! The case is entirely different!’ To
-these exclamations it may be replied: Your last remark is
-but a begging of the question under consideration. We
-affirm that though indeed unfrequent, yet there are occasionally
-spiritual visions in these times, as well as in former,
-and that there is good and very strong testimony that a
-remarkable case of the kind exists in the instance of this
-philosopher, Swedenborg, not by any means on account
-of his own declaration merely, but from the nature of the
-truths and statements brought forth by him, of which our
-own minds, enlightened, we trust, by reason and God’s
-Word, are the judges. The burden of proof—it may be
-continued in answer—falls upon you to show by what law
-of Divine order, by what change in the character and<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_65"></a>[65]</span>
-structure of man’s mind, a spiritual vision can not exist
-now, as well as in the time of Paul,—in the eighteenth or
-nineteenth, as well as in the first century. The truth is,
-antiquity has a wonderful charm for the mind, and a great
-power over it: ‘distance lends enchantment to the view.’
-It is not difficult to believe anything, however wonderful, to
-have taken place in that misty and mysterious region, the
-distant <i>past</i>; but now in these dull, common times, to believe
-such strange things to be capable of happening, seems absurd.
-But do you not suppose that those times, to the men then
-living, appeared as dull and common-place as our times to
-us? Did not the regardless rain fall on Paul’s head, as well
-as on yours and mine? and this very sun and moon light
-his steps as well as ours? Did not Paul, do you think, rise
-often in the morning with a heavy heart, and after breakfast,
-go forth to his duties, or sit down to write his epistles, sad
-and oppressed in spirit, dejected at the thought of the heavy
-responsibilities upon him, and awed with the idea that he
-must address the Athenians to-morrow? And when at
-length he stood before them and began, did they not ask:
-‘Who is this?’ Think you that gaping crowd knew anything
-about any great and celebrated Paul, whose name has become
-so familiar to our ears? They had not heard of such a
-person. ‘And some said, What will this babbler say? others,
-He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods; because he
-preached to them Jesus, and the resurrection. And when
-they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked;
-and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter.
-Howbeit certain men clave unto him, and believed; among
-whom was Dionysius the Areopagite, and a woman named
-Damaris, and others with them.’ (Acts xvii. 16-34.) Here
-we have a picture of human nature, as it was, and as it still
-is. A new person comes forward, a stranger, unheard of
-before, and utters strange ideas, something new and unusual,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_66"></a>[66]</span>
-something different from what men have been accustomed
-to hear, and think of, and believe; most of the hearers jeer
-and mock, and turn away, calling him a babbler; some are
-rather pleased at some things they have heard, but the
-interest has not taken sufficient hold of them to make them
-anxious to pursue the subject farther just now, and they go
-away and forget what they have heard; a few, whose minds
-were in a receptive state, whose hearts had been prepared,
-perhaps, by torturing doubts, and secret meditations, and by
-trials and sufferings of spirit—these at once perceive and
-seize upon the truths they have heard, clasp them to their
-bosoms as something long looked for, as precious treasure,
-and go away rejoicing in their new faith, and resolved to sell
-all they have and follow the Lord. Gradually the truth
-spreads; these few tell what they have heard to others, their
-friends, who they know have been troubled with similar
-doubts and difficulties. By and by these believers meet
-together and form a little congregation, and appoint the
-ablest of their number to preach to them in regard to these
-new truths, both for their own fuller instruction and for the
-information of strangers. Years roll away. It becomes an
-established religious society. Similar societies in neighboring
-cities league with them; and they form a General Church,
-which begins to have a name—the ‘Christian Church.’ Ages
-roll on, and this becomes a vast establishment, extending
-over whole nations, and reaching to distant quarters of the
-globe. This Paul, who was once a nameless preacher, ‘a
-babbler,’ and ‘mad,’ is now looked back upon with the
-utmost veneration; his words are oracles of truth; whatever
-he affirmed, whether in regard to himself or others, is
-implicitly believed. Custom, general acceptance, the belief
-of ages, undoubting confidence in the opinions of our parents
-and friends, all go to render the mind perfectly ready to
-believe those things. Faith is now an easy and natural<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_67"></a>[67]</span>
-thing, and we wonder at those strange and hard-hearted
-unbelievers of Paul’s own time, who had the glorious opportunity
-of listening to him with their own ears. ‘Oh! that
-we could have enjoyed such an opportunity,’ exclaim many,
-‘how gladly would we have listened!’</p>
-
-<p>“But these persons know not what they say, nor the nature
-of the human mind. If they are so anxious to have
-such an opportunity, so ready to be tested, and to show that
-they would have discernment enough to see genuine truth,
-though heard for the first time, and to acknowledge a great
-teacher and apostle, though yet unknown to the world—that
-opportunity is now before them. A Paul is again preaching
-to the Athenians and to the world. A great teacher is again
-uttering new and sublime truths. The Lord Himself has
-come a second time, not in Person, but in Spirit; not as the
-‘Word made flesh,’ as before, but as the essential Word, by
-the opening of the interior truth—the <i>spiritual sense</i>—which
-it contains. Those who believe, that, had they been on
-earth, they would have acknowledged the Lord at His First
-Coming, or would have readily received the teachings of
-His Apostles, have now the opportunity of making trial of
-their faith; of showing whether they are able to overcome
-the inveteracy of custom, the natural opposition of prejudice,
-the fear of public opinion, the love of the world and its
-powers and pleasures, (all which difficulties the first Christians
-had to encounter,) whether, in the face of all these,
-they can, looking for the truth with a single eye, discern it
-now at its feeble dawn; and, advancing steadily and earnestly
-towards it, be among the first to hail the rising day.”</p>
-
-<p>What more can be said on the subject? The Christian
-has no choice but to acknowledge, or refute, Swedenborg’s
-claims on the ground of their own intrinsic merit.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg was gifted with peculiar powers of respiration.
-From early childhood, when on his knees at prayer,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_68"></a>[68]</span>
-and afterwards when engaged in profound meditation, he
-found that his natural respiration was for the time suspended.
-As we have seen in his work on the “Animal Kingdom,”
-his attention to the correspondence between thought and respiration
-had been of long continuance,—probably from the
-fact that his own system supplied him with such constant
-illustrations of its nature. This power of suspended respiration
-under deep thought, common to all men, was preternaturally
-developed in Swedenborg. At this period he discovered
-the use to which these peculiar powers of his were to be
-applied; for he writes: “My respiration has been so formed
-by the Lord, as to enable me to breathe inwardly for a long
-period of time, without the aid of the external air; my respiration
-being directed within, and my outward senses, as
-well as actions, still continuing in their vigor, which is only
-possible with persons who have been so formed by the Lord.
-I have also been instructed that my breathing was so directed,
-without my being aware of it, in order to enable me to be
-with spirits, and to speak with them.” Those who have
-studied mesmerism and clairvoyance know many facts that
-confirm and illustrate this position of Swedenborg’s with
-regard to respiration; and it is quite evident that the Hindoo
-Yogi are capable of a similar state. There is this great difference,
-however, between such instances and the case of
-Swedenborg, that his powers were natural, and continuous
-in their exercise, and not sought after and induced by himself;
-while theirs are only occasional, and are frequently
-brought about by artificial means.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg’s intromission into the spiritual world was a
-gradual process; and for this reason the date of his illumination
-is variously given, ranging between 1743 and 1745.
-It appears, however, that he came into the full exercise of
-his spiritual seership while living in London.</p>
-
-<p>Of late years it has become common to talk of Swedenborg<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_69"></a>[69]</span>
-as a clairvoyant, to associate him with mesmeric
-subjects, and make him a kinsman of French and American
-spiritualists, such as Cahagnet, and Andrew Jackson Davis.
-This mistake is made through ignorance. It is a law of the
-spiritual world that every man is associated with his like.
-Supposing, therefore, that any man’s spiritual sight were
-opened, he would come into conjunction only with spirits
-like himself; that is, with those who would echo his own
-ideas and opinions, and repeat his own feelings. It is evident,
-then, that in such a case the nature of the revelations
-are entirely dependent upon the character of the revelator,
-and in all cases must be suspiciously received by the lover
-of truth. Now Swedenborg claims to have been under the
-special protection of the Lord, and to have received the doctrines
-he promulgated directly from Him, and not in any
-case from spirits. Of course, every one will decide for himself
-as to how far he can receive this assertion; but it is well
-that all should be informed of the precise character of Swedenborg’s
-claim, and of his own testimony as to the source
-of his information. In his Diary, written about this time,
-he says, that “spirits narrate things wholly false, and lie.
-When spirits begin to speak with man, care should be taken
-not to believe them; for almost everything they say is made
-up by them, and they lie; so that if it were permitted them
-to relate what heaven is, and how things are in heaven, they
-would tell so many falsehoods, and with such strong assertion,
-that man would be astonished; wherefore it was not
-permitted me, when spirits were speaking, to have any belief
-in what they stated. They love to feign. Whatever may
-be the topic spoken of, they think they know it, and form
-different opinions about it, altogether as if they knew; and
-if man then listens and believes, they insist, and in various
-ways deceive and seduce.”</p>
-
-<p>Any one who has paid attention to the phenomena of<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_70"></a>[70]</span>
-spirit-rapping, and to the communications received through
-clairvoyants from the world of spirits, and has observed the
-very Babel of contradictions uttered by these “mediums,”
-will be able to appreciate the truth of the passage we have
-quoted, as well as our desire to draw a broad and distinct
-line between such and Swedenborg.</p>
-
-<p>It is a very natural question, and one often put by those
-unconversant with the nature of spiritual intercourse, how it
-happens that such a man as Swedenborg, sitting quietly in
-his chair, could see and speak with angels and spirits, and
-travel through vast spaces in the spiritual world. It is thus:
-Space and time are attributes of matter alone. Their appearances
-do, indeed, exist in the spiritual world, but not as
-the fixed and mensurable things of our material sphere.
-Did not our subject forbid digression, it would be easy to
-bring this truth down to the comprehension of every one, by
-reference to a few items of experience which must at some
-time have fallen to the lot of all. We are all, as to our
-minds, in constant, though insensible, communion with
-spirits; and from them we receive thoughts and feelings of
-every kind. A good man and a wicked man may be, as to
-the body, in the same room, while between their minds there
-may be the wide gulf that separated Dives and Lazarus.
-Now if the spiritual sight of these two men were opened,
-where would they be? One would be in heaven, and the
-other in hell; and that, too, without either moving from
-the place where he stood. It was in virtue of this principle
-of the spirit’s perfect independence of space, that Swedenborg,
-under the Divine guidance and protection, was led
-through spiritual societies of all kinds: and in his various
-works we have the record of the wondrous things thus heard
-and seen.</p>
-
-<p>Again, it may be asked: What is the nature of this
-spiritual sight so often referred to? In the words of Paul<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_71"></a>[71]</span>
-we answer: “There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual
-body;” and, as a consequence, there is a natural sight, and
-there is a spiritual sight. The natural body lives from the
-spiritual body, and derives its form and parts from it. The
-natural body is the instrument of the spiritual body, and
-through it as a medium, it is enabled to exist in this lower
-world, and in constant contact with matter. Now it is possible
-for the spiritual body to be raised partially above the
-natural body, without causing death, or the entire withdrawal
-of its life from the natural body. This partial withdrawal
-of the spiritual body, and the enjoyment of sight in
-the spiritual world, is what is meant by the opening of the
-spiritual sight. Time forbids us to draw upon the innumerable
-illustrations of this fact which the history of the past
-and the experience of the present, in conjunction with the
-Word of God, afford. Let one instance from the Bible suffice.
-In 2 Kings, vii. 8-17, we read that Elisha, compassed
-about with horses, chariots, and a great host, sent by the
-king of Syria to seize him, was on a mountain with his servant,
-who, full of terror, exclaimed: “Alas! my master, how
-shall we do? And he answered, Fear not, for they that be
-with us are more than they that be with them. And Elisha
-prayed and said, Lord, I pray thee <i>open his eyes</i>, that he may
-see. And the Lord <i>opened the eyes</i> of the young man, and
-he <i>saw</i>: and behold, the mountain was full of horses and
-chariots of fire round about Elisha.” Here is a case quite
-to the point. The natural eyes of the young man were
-already open; for how otherwise could he have seen the
-Syrian host, and have been afraid? Elisha prayed that his
-eyes might be opened. What eyes? Why, clearly, the eyes
-of his spiritual body; which done, he was enabled to perceive
-the heavenly guardianship which was extended over his
-master. Every one will now understand what we mean,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_72"></a>[72]</span>
-when we shall have occasion to speak of the opening of
-man’s spiritual sight.</p>
-
-<p>Having thus defined the conditions of Swedenborg’s
-spiritual vision, and cleared away some questions which, if
-answered, would have impeded our narrative, we will now
-proceed with our history.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_73"></a>[73]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_IX">CHAPTER IX.</h2>
-
-<p><i>Prepares for his New Office—Resigns his Assessorship—His “Adversaria”—His
-“Spiritual Diary”—The Death of Polheim.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>Called to a high and holy office, Swedenborg set about
-preparing himself for the fulfilment of its duties. Leaving
-London in the beginning of July, 1745, he took ship for
-Sweden, where he arrived on the 7th of August. On this
-voyage, his spiritual intercourse was suspended. He lived
-quietly at home during 1746; probably in the performance
-and enjoyment of the settled routine of his Assessorship, and
-in earnest meditation on the heavenly arcana now fully
-opened to his view. In 1747, in order that he might be
-more at liberty to devote himself to the mission to which the
-Lord had called him, he asked leave of King Frederick to
-retire from his Assessorship, and that he might enjoy, during
-life, as a retiring pension, half of his official salary; requesting,
-at the same time, that no addition to his rank or title
-might be conferred upon him. The King yielded to his
-wishes; but in consideration of his long and faithful service
-of thirty-one years, continued to him the whole of his
-salary.</p>
-
-<p>Meanwhile, he learned Hebrew, and read the Bible through
-several times in its original languages. Like all true students,
-he read and thought with pen in hand; and as the
-hidden and Divine wisdom of the Word was opened to him,
-he embodied in “Adversaria,” or notes, the truths thus revealed.
-These Adversaria extend over the historical books<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_74"></a>[74]</span>
-of the Old Testament, and several of the prophets. They
-have all been printed of late years, from their author’s original
-Latin manuscript, by that indefatigable and learned
-Newchurchman, Dr. Tafel, of Tübingen. They have not
-yet been translated into English, probably because they were
-not published by Swedenborg himself, and are only to be regarded
-as preparatory studies for future works. They also
-abound with indistinct views on many subjects, which subsequent
-knowledge rendered clear. As records of their author’s
-spiritual progress, as well as for the many valuable
-facts which they contain, it is to be hoped that the day is not
-far distant when the “Adversaria” will appear in an English
-dress. We cannot spare anything which serves to illustrate
-the mental history of such a man as Swedenborg.</p>
-
-<p>In 1747, he ceased writing his “Adversaria,” and commenced
-a Spiritual Diary, which he continued for twenty
-years. This Diary, written also in Latin, (as all his theological
-works were,) has been lately published by Dr. Tafel in
-ten closely printed octavos. Two volumes have been translated
-and published in England and America, and the remainder
-will probably soon follow. It will hardly be necessary
-for us to go into a detailed account of the principles
-and facts scattered throughout its long and miscellaneous
-record. We shall meet with all the leading ideas in noticing
-the books published by himself, and laid before the world as
-matured and finished productions. It may be said, however,
-that the “Diary,” as a work, is perfectly unique; for in no
-literature can we find its counterpart. We have in it, for
-twenty years, an almost daily record of Swedenborg’s spiritual
-states and temptations; his interviews and conversations
-with angels, spirits, and devils; and accounts of their pleasures,
-punishments, and thoughts. No one who makes an
-intimate acquaintance with this “Diary,” will ever after
-allow a shadow of doubt to cross his mind as to the candor<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_75"></a>[75]</span>
-and truth of Swedenborg; for in every page, he will perceive
-that quiet and solemn earnestness which belongs alone to the
-upright and honest in heart. In its whole range of experience,
-he will detect no vanity, shuffling, double-dealing, or
-anything inconsistent with his published works; but all as
-straightforward, open, and unreserved, as truth itself. Although
-written in the quietude of his own study, and for his
-own eye and use alone, he could not have been more ingenuous
-and sincere had the whole universe been looking down
-upon its pages.</p>
-
-<p>On the page of history, the “Diary” throws some wondrous
-light. In it, we read of interviews with many of the
-famous men of ancient and modern times. From some
-names which the world has learned to revere, the mask of
-excellence is quite torn away, while the infamy of others is
-proved to have been but judgment from appearance, and
-from scandal. Any one who is infected with the spiritual
-disease of hero-worship, should read the “Spiritual Diary.”
-He will there discover that the most dazzling intellect fades
-into moping idiocy and insanity, when it lacks the sterling
-heart, and honest aim; and that goodness alone is the life
-and soul of true wisdom. He will also learn why it is so.</p>
-
-<p>We would here say a word upon a jest started by Emerson,
-(and which has re-appeared under many forms,) to the
-effect that all the souls with whom Swedenborg held converse,
-talked Swedenborgese. In reply, we would ask, how
-they could speak in any other way? Swedenborg did not
-profess to be a mimic; and if Cicero or anybody else spoke
-with him in the spiritual world and in the spiritual language,
-Swedenborg, in translating the speech into his own
-simple diction, would, of course, seize the substance, and
-care nothing for the form. That the language was not
-Cicero’s, might be true; but if the ideas were, what matter?
-The subject would hardly be worth mentioning, did we not<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_76"></a>[76]</span>
-see the jest receiving a wide currency; but a few words of
-common sense are all that are necessary to take the life out
-of it.</p>
-
-<p>There is no work with which we are acquainted, that can
-give its readers a better idea of the reality of the future life,
-than the “Spiritual Diary.” No other book, we know, can
-so stir up a man to set his mind, or spiritual house, in order
-here, so that he may be spared the turmoil and sorrow which
-otherwise he will encounter beyond the tomb. In its pages,
-the life after death is portrayed in all its stern reality; not
-as a vague dream, or a shadowy vision, of which the mind
-can form no fixed idea. We read of the awful states induced
-in the other life, by evil habits contracted in this; from loose
-speech, jesting upon sacred subjects, indulgence in idleness
-and luxury, down to blacker crimes. We learn from sight,
-as it were, how evil is its own torment, and how goodness
-is its own sweet and rich reward; and in view of the
-momentous issues of what we too often regard as the trifles
-of life, we feel impelled to make our peace and heaven here,
-that we may bear them with us into the Hereafter. Such
-high uses does the “Spiritual Diary” subserve.</p>
-
-<p>The “Diary” is, however, a work not suited for an early
-student of Swedenborg. The principles upon which it is
-written, not being understood, a young reader could hardly
-fail to form erroneous ideas from it, and misjudge the work
-itself. It is only after some acquaintance with the spiritual
-laws expounded in Swedenborg’s theological writings, that it
-can be read with profit. Incidents, which, at first sight,
-might appear ridiculous and irrational, are brought within
-the pale of reason and belief when the laws upon which they
-are founded are understood; and as effects, not causes, constitute
-the burden of the “Diary,” the need of this caution
-will be apparent. When, however, the laws of spiritual life<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_77"></a>[77]</span>
-are understood, the “Diary” becomes a work of peculiar
-and most profitable instruction.</p>
-
-<p>While Swedenborg was living in Sweden, in 1751, his old
-friend and coadjutor, Polheim, died; and Swedenborg was
-favored with a view of <i>both</i> sides of his grave. Writing in
-his “Spiritual Diary,” he says: “Polheim died on Monday,
-and spoke with me on Thursday. I was invited to the
-funeral. He saw the hearse, the attendants, and the whole
-procession. He also saw them let down the coffin into the
-grave, and conversed with me while it was going on, asking
-me why they buried him, when he was alive. And when
-the priest pronounced that he would rise again at the day
-of judgment, he asked why this was, when he had already
-risen. He wondered that such a belief should prevail,
-considering that he was even now alive; he also wondered
-at the belief in the resurrection of the body, for he said he
-felt that he was in the body: with other remarks.” Such a
-relation will seem strange, very strange to many. But have
-patience. When the laws and principles upon which such
-phenomena take place, are comprehended, all their strangeness
-and improbability will straightway disappear.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_78"></a>[78]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_X">CHAPTER X.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>The Arcana Cœlestia.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>It was about the middle of 1749, that Swedenborg made
-his first appearance as a theologian, by the publication of the
-first volume of the “Arcana Cœlestia.” At the beginning
-of 1750, we find his publisher, John Lewis, of Paternoster
-Row, announcing the issue of the second volume, in cheap
-numbers, both in English and Latin. The issue continued
-in volumes till 1756, when the work was completed in eight
-good sized quartos. His publisher states in one of his
-advertisements, that though he is “positively forbid to discover
-the author’s name, yet he hopes to be excused for
-mentioning his benign and generous qualities.” He avers
-that “this gentleman, with indefatigable pains and labor,
-spent one whole year in studying and writing out the first
-volume of the ‘Arcana,’ was at the expense of £200 to print
-it, and advanced £200 more for the printing of the second;
-and when he had done this, he gave express orders that all
-the money that should arise in the sale, should be given
-towards the charge of the propagation of the gospel. He is
-so far from desiring to make a gain of his labors, that he
-will not receive one farthing back of the £400 he has
-expended; and for that reason his works will come exceedingly
-cheap to the public.”</p>
-
-<p>The “Arcana Cœlestia” is an exposition of the books
-of Genesis and Exodus, with intervening chapters which
-describe the wonders of the future life. At the outset, it<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_79"></a>[79]</span>
-will be necessary to state that Swedenborg believed the
-Bible to be the Word of God. “Well, what Christian does
-not believe so?” it may be asked. Few expressions pass
-more glibly over the lips of religious people, than the short
-phrase, “the word of God;” but how many take time to
-consider its infinite meaning? The Word of God—a production
-of the infinite Father of all, the Creator and Sustainer
-of the universe,—must be infinitely superior to any human
-composition; and, like God’s other volume, the book of
-nature, must yield up fresh wonders to every investigator;
-and the more it is searched into, the more real unceasing
-beauties of wisdom and design, till at length the strained
-intellect of man finds its truest wisdom lies in the deepest
-humility and adoration. Thus logically thinking, we experience
-a serious reverse when we turn to the opinions expressed
-regarding the Word by even its most reverential commentators.
-At no period of history has the Bible been submitted
-to more earnest study than in these times; but the results
-have been in the highest degree meagre and unworthy, when
-placed in comparison with the same exercise of mind on the
-subjects of natural creation. We have most elaborate and
-minute criticisms on the sacred text; we have treatises on
-the animals, the insects, and the vegetables mentioned in the
-hallowed record; we have books filled with descriptions of
-domestic life among the Jews, their customs, and their
-language; the prophecies have been subjected to all manner
-of ingenious interpretation, but after all, with the poorest
-spiritual results, and such as can in no wise excite a deeper
-respect, or a warmer love, for God’s holy Word, than was
-entertained centuries ago, when such learning was a rarer
-thing. Yet if we believe that God inspired this Book, can
-we for a moment suppose that it should have no other end
-than the narration of the history of a petty people, and the
-enunciation of dark prophecies, which the acutest of men<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_80"></a>[80]</span>
-pronounce impenetrable mysteries, and which the daring
-and the foolish turn to all manner of profane purposes in
-political soothsayings? If the Bible be indeed the Word
-of God, it must contain within itself much more than the
-majority of Christians suppose; otherwise it presents a most
-startling anomaly when viewed in comparison with the other
-Divine work, the natural universe.</p>
-
-<p>The assumption, then, with which Swedenborg starts, is,
-that the Scripture is in very truth the Word of God; that
-every syllable and expression therein are His; that Moses,
-David, the prophets, and the Evangelists, were simply the
-inspired penmen, who wrote implicitly according to Divine
-dictation.</p>
-
-<p>He teaches, moreover, that the Word does not belong to
-men alone, but is the possession likewise of the angels of
-heaven, to whom it wears different forms according to the
-degree of their love and intelligence. In general, it may be
-said to have three senses, or meanings; first, a celestial sense,
-apprehended by the celestial or highest angels; secondly, a
-spiritual sense, apprehended by a lower range of angelic
-minds, the spiritual; and thirdly, a natural sense, with which
-we are all familiar, written down to the comprehension of
-the lowest, most worldly, and sensual of men—the Jews.
-These three senses make one by correspondence; although
-diverse, they are still harmonious, and connected by one
-divine life.</p>
-
-<p>The Word, moreover, we are taught, has worn different
-garments, or varied natural senses, at different eras. The
-first church, Adam, or the primeval race of men, did not
-possess a written Word, but were gifted with a perception
-of spiritual essences. Nature was literally spread before
-them as an open book. To them, Nature was the expression
-of the Divine Wisdom; and they saw in every beast of the
-forest, in every flower of the field, and in every scene of creation,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_81"></a>[81]</span>
-evidence of the Divine presence, and material emblems
-of spiritual and heavenly things. As men declined
-from purity, and, together with their innocence, lost their
-wisdom and their powers of celestial perception, a written
-Word became necessary, accommodated to the changed
-state of the new spiritual church called Noah. In time,
-this Word had also to be withdrawn, for its purity and language
-transcended the apprehension of a falling and sensualised
-world. Yet this Ancient Word, Swedenborg tells
-us, is not lost, but still exists in Tartary, probably as an unvalued
-treasure, which may be restored to the church in due
-season. To this Ancient Word, we have two allusions in
-the Jewish Scriptures; the first in Numbers xxi. 14, where
-we read: “Wherefore it is said in the book of the <i>Wars of
-Jehovah</i>;” and the second in Joshua x. 13: “Is not this
-written in the book of <i>Jasher</i>?” The book of the Wars of
-Jehovah, and the book of Jasher, forming parts of the
-Ancient Word, became unintelligible from being written in
-high correspondential and emblematic language; and uninteresting
-because not associated with the personal and
-worldly interests of men. The Jewish Scriptures were then
-written. The Divine Wisdom clothed itself in such words,
-histories, and laws, as the earthly-minded Jews could love
-and reverence, and thus be kept, in some measure, in connection
-with heaven, and in the possession of the most
-general and leading truths of religion. The Gospels, added
-in the course of time to the Jewish Word, served still
-further to preserve the church in union with heaven and the
-Lord. But now we see that mankind having in the course
-of centuries re-ascended to a higher degree of intellectual
-life, begin to be dissatisfied with the Scriptures, to arraign
-the truth of science against them, to wonder how it is possible
-that such writings can be the Word of God, and to ask,
-with Emerson, “What have I to do with jasper and sardonyx,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_82"></a>[82]</span>
-beryl and chalcedony, what with arks and passovers,
-ephahs, heave-offerings, and unleavened bread; what with
-chariots of fire, and ephods; what with lepers and emerods;
-what with dragons crowned and horned, behemoth and unicorn?”
-But the Lord anticipates all man’s wants; and,
-caring above all things for his spiritual well-being, never permits
-him to live without a witness of His love and designs
-towards him. By His Word, the Lord reveals himself to
-man; and without it, man could know nothing of God, of
-heaven and hell, and of a life after death. How necessary
-then it is that man be preserved from falling into contempt
-of its teachings; and yet if it contains no other than a literal
-sense, what can a Christian say in reply to such questionings
-as those above quoted? and what tenable theory can be advanced
-to meet the objections of the sceptic drawn from
-geology, astronomy, and many other sciences which clash
-with the letter of Scripture? In the “Arcana Cœlestia,” we
-find a solution of all such doubts in the clear manifestation
-of the Divine authorship of the Word, through the revelation
-of its spiritual sense, whereby reason and faith are perfectly
-conjoined; and man, while here below, is fed with
-angels’ food.</p>
-
-<p>But it is not to be concluded from this that Swedenborg
-in any way slights or undervalues the literal sense of the
-Word. Far from it. He says: “The literal sense of the
-Word is the basis, the continent, and the firmament of its
-spiritual and celestial senses; and hence in it the divine
-truth is in its fulness, its sanctity, and its power; therefore
-the doctrine of the church should be drawn from the literal
-sense, and confirmed thereby.” From this, every one will
-see that no mysticism can be sheltered under a belief in the
-spiritual sense of the Word; for, from the literal sense, determined
-by the severest criticism, all doctrine must be
-drawn, and all creeds tested. Swedenborg also teaches, that<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_83"></a>[83]</span>
-by means of the literal sense, men enjoy conjunction with
-the Lord; for His divine spirit is with all who read his
-Word devoutly. To promote this divine communion, the
-letter of Scripture has been so framed as to possess a universal
-interest. The child reads the Bible, and is delighted
-with its charming stories; the simple cottager loves it and
-prizes it as he prizes no other book; the poet draws from it
-his richest inspirations; and the man of learning, who has
-gathered knowledge from all times and lands, turns to its
-hallowed page, and in the light of its divine wisdom sees
-himself but a child in knowledge.</p>
-
-<p>Though the Scriptures are thus marvellously adapted, in
-the literal sense, to the tastes, feelings, and necessities of men
-of all grades and states, yet, as before said, many portions
-of them do, in our days, require to be vindicated from the
-charge of being inconsistent with science—from the charge
-of insignificance, and dealing in petty details. They need,
-in fine, to be elevated from mere history, poetry, and obsolete
-law, into practical use and connection with the daily life
-and conduct of every man and woman; so that they may be
-to us, in very deed, the Word of God, as truly as they were
-to the Jews three thousand years ago.</p>
-
-<p>Let us now see how, in the “Arcana Cœlestia,” all this is
-effected.</p>
-
-<p>“From the posterity of the most Ancient Church, Moses
-received what he wrote concerning the creation, the Garden
-of Eden, etc., down to the time of Abraham,” writes Swedenborg.
-Describing the method by which the people of
-that church expressed themselves, he adds: “When they
-mentioned earthly and worldly things, they thought of
-the spiritual and celestial things which they represented;
-so that they not only expressed themselves by representatives,
-but also <i>reduced their thoughts into a kind of series, as
-of historical particulars</i>, in order to give them more life; and<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_84"></a>[84]</span>
-in this they found their greatest delight.” Understanding
-this fully, we shall not be surprised to learn that the first
-eleven chapters of Genesis are <i>purely allegorical</i>; written not
-as a description of the creation of the material world, and
-its fortunes, but as a description of the internal life of the
-earliest people, of the development of their minds up to celestial
-perfection, and then of their gradual declension from
-purity, their love of the evil and the false, and finally the
-destruction of their souls, symbolized by the deluge overspreading
-the face of the whole earth. These chapters were
-thus written by the Lord in accommodation to the tastes of
-the men of the Ancient Church, who, as we read, had “their
-greatest delight in the expression of spiritual and celestial
-things in a series of historical particulars;” just as, in after
-times, He clothed His Wisdom in Jewish history and law,
-so that He might be with the Jews, and preserve within them
-some small remains of spiritual life. What a relief to the
-mind, torn and troubled with the thousand doubts which
-science has cast upon the early chapters of Genesis, is the
-acceptation of the truth of their entirely allegorical signification!
-And how plainly, in their spiritual sense, do we
-find testimony of their divine authorship! It should not be
-forgotten that the doctrine of the symbolical nature of these
-chapters, was set forth by Swedenborg long before science
-had demonstrated that their merely literal sense was wholly
-irreconcilable with the facts of nature; thus quite independently
-of any external pressure or necessity. It must be
-known to every one that geology—the science which, above
-all others, has brought the most weighty objections against
-the six days’ creation, and the deluge of the whole earth by
-a flood which covered the tops of the highest mountains,—is
-a new science. At the time when Swedenborg wrote, it
-was entirely undeveloped. The reconciling of the literal
-sense of these chapters with the facts of geology, has perplexed<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_85"></a>[85]</span>
-more minds, and engaged more intellect, than did
-ever perpetual motion and the squaring of the circle. The
-amount of speculation which has been expended upon this
-theme, is immense, as every one at all acquainted with the
-religious history of the last fifty years is aware; and still
-the labor is vigorously prosecuted. We have no inclination
-to undervalue the motives that prompt to it. For all sincere
-lovers of the Word of God we entertain the deepest respect,
-and rejoice to think that their faith in the Bible remains
-unshaken amid such fiery trials. Yet if Christians
-were wise and unprejudiced, they would turn to Swedenborg’s
-“Arcana Cœlestia,” and there find all that heart or
-mind could wish. Its readers, who have been many, (and
-yet, when compared with the wide world of Christendom,
-insignificantly few,) have had, during all these seasons of
-doubt, the fullest peace; and have been ready to welcome
-every truth of science, however militating against the literal
-sense of the early chapters of Genesis; and all the while
-have remained such lovers of the Word as none but believers
-in its spiritual sense can be. We believe that the religious
-world will, in process of time, when all methods of
-reconciling the letter of Scripture with geology shall have
-manifestly failed, finally turn to Swedenborg; and when the
-heavenly truth glowing in his pages shall beam upon their
-opened sight, they will wonder why they did not read his luminous
-volumes sooner.</p>
-
-<p>From the Call of Abram, the Word is to be looked upon
-as a narration of historical events. Yet while, as history, it
-possesses a great charm and interest to every mind, from its
-matchless and beautiful simplicity, we cannot see what claim
-it could have to the title of the Word of God, did it not
-contain within itself, as Swedenborg abundantly demonstrates,
-a spiritual sense, universally applicable to men in all
-states, times, and situations. In the highest or celestial<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_86"></a>[86]</span>
-sense, the Word refers solely to the Lord, and is a description
-of his nature and attributes, of his assumption of corrupt
-humanity, and the process of its glorification. Man
-being formed in the Lord’s image and likeness, whatever
-treats of Him, is, in a secondary sense, or in a lower degree,
-descriptive of man, his nature and regeneration. This
-secondary application of the Word forms its spiritual sense,
-which when understood, transforms Genesis and Exodus from
-mere history and dull ceremonial law, into a Divine revelation
-of the laws of spiritual life, pregnant with practical benefit to
-all men, because applicable to every incident and thought
-of life.</p>
-
-<p>Time and space would alike fail were we to attempt to
-give the most general outline of the multitude of spiritual
-truths which are unveiled in the course of the exposition of
-Genesis and Exodus; and not of these two books alone, but
-of passages from all parts of the Word, which are drawn
-upon to illustrate and confirm the truth of the interpretation.
-As Wilkinson says, “Consider, gentle reader, twelve
-goodly 8vo volumes [in English,] written with such continued
-power that it seems as if eating, drinking, and sleeping,
-had never intervened between the penman and his page,
-so unbroken is the subject, and so complete the sense. Add
-to the other health and harmony of this unflagging man, a
-memory of the most extraordinary grasp, which enabled him
-to administer the details of an intellect ranging through all
-truth on the one hand, and through the whole field of Scripture
-illustration and text upon the other. Then take into
-account the unity of the work from first to last; the constant
-reference that binds all parts of it together, and shows the
-caution with which each strong affirmation is at first set
-down. Observe also the felicity of phrase, the happiness of
-mind, the easy greatness, which shine along and dignify
-those serious pages. Remark also, that the author does not<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_87"></a>[87]</span>
-deal in generalities, but sentence for sentence, and word for
-word, he translates his text into spiritual meaning, and criticises
-and supports himself with nearly every parallel text in
-the sacred writings.”</p>
-
-<p>The earnest reader of the “Arcana” will never question
-the reality of Swedenborg’s mission. He would as soon
-question the reality of the world, or his own existence. This
-is a strong assertion, a stranger to the work will perhaps
-say; but it is only a stranger to these wondrous volumes that
-will say so; for every one at all familiar with them will
-agree with us. We never take down a volume of the
-“Arcana” to read, without feeling more and more assured
-that Swedenborg was an anointed servant of the Lord. The
-depths of spiritual experience he reveals, his insight into the
-inmost recesses of the heart, his explanation of the causes
-of thoughts, and the origin of our various desires and inclinations,
-of lowness of spirits, of pleasant and dull moods, in
-short, of all spiritual trials and temptations, with the heavenly
-ends they are permitted to serve, together with a
-thousand other matters which it concerns us all to know, are
-of such a nature that we cannot but feel that such knowledge
-must have been derived from a Divine source, and
-that unless his stand-point had been most peculiar, and providentially
-appointed, it would have been impossible for him
-to have written as he has. To speak of the “Arcana” as it
-deserves, would, to one unacquainted with it, appear like
-exaggeration, while every reader would feel that we had
-fallen far short of the truth in many points. No criticism,
-however reverential, can adequately express the innumerable
-and marvellous excellencies of the work; and should
-this feeble testimony to its worth excite any one to read and
-<i>study</i> it,—and it is a work which should be studied, if read
-at all,—we know that he will say, as the Queen of Sheba
-said of Solomon, “It was a true report that I heard of thy<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_88"></a>[88]</span>
-acts and of thy wisdom. Howbeit I believed not the words,
-until I came, and mine eyes had seen it: and behold the
-half was not told me.”</p>
-
-<p>We have not spoken of those chapters which come between
-the expositions of Scripture, because the subjects
-therein treated of will recur in notices of his other books.
-They serve to diversify the work, and to relieve the mind
-tasked with the deep thought involved in the spiritual expositions,
-by the contemplation of some of the leading facts
-of the future life.</p>
-
-<p>The “Arcana Cœlestia” was translated into English by
-the late venerable John Clowes, a clergyman of the Established
-Church in Manchester, and a most cordial receiver
-and preacher of the doctrines of the New Church. It
-is published in twelve octavo volumes, with an index prepared
-by Swedenborg himself, which forms a thirteenth
-volume. This index has been greatly extended by Elihu
-Rich, filling two large octavos. Several editions of the “Arcana”
-have also been published in America; and the
-sale, considering the size and cost of the work, has been in
-both countries very considerable. It is a work which will
-in coming days run through many cheap editions; and when
-that time shall come, many will wonder why such a treasury
-of spiritual wisdom lay so long in our midst, and yet men
-thought so little of it. But the world is approaching Swedenborg
-as fast as steady progress will permit.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_89"></a>[89]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XI">CHAPTER XI.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Anecdotes.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>Of Swedenborg’s external life, during the composition
-of the “Arcana Cœlestia,” we know little. From his “Spiritual
-Diary,” we incidentally learn that he was in Stockholm
-on the 23d of July, 1756. A revolution had been attempted,
-and the leaders of the conspiracy, Count Brahe and Baron
-Horn, were executed on that day. Swedenborg writes of
-Brahe thus:—“Brahe was beheaded at ten o’clock in the
-morning, and spoke with me at ten at night; that is to say,
-twelve hours after his execution. He was with me almost
-without interruption for several days. In two days’ time,
-he began to return to his former life, which consisted in
-loving worldly things; and after three days, he became as
-he was before in the world, and was carried into the evils
-that he had made his own before he died.” (S. Diary, 5099.)</p>
-
-<p>Robsahm, a friend of Swedenborg’s, probably alludes to
-this circumstance, when he writes: “One day as a criminal
-was led to the place of execution to be beheaded, I was by
-the side of Swedenborg, and asked him how such a person felt
-at the time of his execution. He answered: ‘When a man
-lays his head on the block, he loses all sensation. When he
-first comes into the spiritual world, and finds that he is
-living, he is seized with the fear of his expected death, tries
-to escape, and is very much frightened. At such a moment
-no one thinks of anything but the happiness of heaven, or
-the misery of hell. Soon the good spirits come to him, and<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_90"></a>[90]</span>
-instruct him where he is, and he is then left to follow his
-own inclinations, which soon lead him to the place where he
-remains for ever.’” It appears that whatever happens at
-the hour of death, is carried into the other life, and the state
-is continued for some time. Thus we read in the “Spiritual
-Diary” of a person who had been reduced by melancholy
-to despair, until being instigated by diabolical spirits, he
-destroyed himself, by thrusting a knife into his body. “This
-spirit came to me,” writes Swedenborg, “complaining that
-he was miserably treated by evil spirits. He was seen by
-me, holding a knife in his hand, as though he would plunge
-it into his breast. With this knife he labored very hard, as
-wishing rather to cast it from him, but in vain.”</p>
-
-<p>It soon became widely known that Swedenborg had intercourse
-with spirits; and many and various were the demands
-made upon him, for information of one kind and another.
-The Queen of Sweden asked him whether his spiritual
-intercourse was a science or art that could be communicated
-to others. He said: “No, it is the gift of the Lord.” “Can
-you then,” said she, “speak with every one deceased, or only
-with certain persons?” He answered, “I can not converse
-with all, but only with such as I have known in this world,
-with all royal and princely persons, with all renowned
-heroes, or great and learned men, whom I have known,
-either personally, or from their actions or writings; consequently
-with all <i>of whom I could form an idea</i>; for it may
-be supposed that a person whom I never knew, and of whom
-I could form no idea, I neither could or would wish to speak
-with.”</p>
-
-<p>The Prince of Prussia was brother to the Queen of
-Sweden, and shortly after his death, Swedenborg being at
-court, the Queen perceiving him said: “Well, Mr. Assessor,
-have you seen my brother?” He answered, “No.” Whereupon
-she replied: “If you should see him, remember me to<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_91"></a>[91]</span>
-him.” In saying this, she did but jest. Eight days afterwards,
-Swedenborg came again to court, but so early that
-the Queen had not left her apartment called the white room,
-where she was conversing with her maids of honor, and
-other ladies of the court. Swedenborg did not wait for the
-Queen’s coming out, but entered directly into her apartment,
-and whispered in her ear. The Queen, struck with astonishment,
-was taken ill, and did not recover for some time.
-After she was come to herself, she said to those about her:
-“There is only God and my brother who can know what he
-has just told me.” She owned that he had spoken of her
-last correspondence with the prince, the subject of which
-was known to themselves alone.</p>
-
-<p>The following is narrated by J. H. Jung Stilling:—“About
-the year 1770, there was a merchant in Elberfeld
-with whom, during seven years of my residence there, I
-lived in close intimacy. He spoke little; but what he said
-was like golden fruit on a salver of silver. He would not
-have dared for all the world to have told a falsehood. His
-business requiring him to take a journey to Amsterdam,
-where Swedenborg at that time resided, and having heard
-and read much of this strange individual, he formed the
-intention of visiting him. He therefore called upon him,
-and found a very venerable looking, friendly old man, who
-received him politely, and requested him to be seated.
-Explaining his errand, and expressing his deep admiration
-of Swedenborg’s writings, he desired that he would give him
-a proof of his intercourse with the unseen world. Swedenborg
-said: ‘Why not? Most willingly.’ The merchant
-then proceeded to tell that he had formerly a friend, who
-studied divinity at Duisburg, where he fell into a consumption,
-of which he died. Visiting this friend a short time
-before his decease, they conversed together on an important
-topic. The question he then put to Swedenborg, was: ‘Can<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_92"></a>[92]</span>
-you learn from the student what was the subject of our
-discourse at that time?’ Swedenborg replied: ‘We will see;
-what was the name of your friend?’ The merchant told his
-name, and Swedenborg then requested him to call in a few
-days. Some days after, the merchant went again to see
-Swedenborg, in anxious expectation. The old gentleman
-met him with a smile, and said: ‘I have spoken with your
-friend; the subject of your discourse was <i>the restitution of all
-things</i>.’ He then related to the merchant, with the greatest
-precision, what he, and what his deceased friend, had maintained.
-The merchant turned pale; for this proof was
-powerful and invincible. He inquired further: ‘How fares
-it with my friend? Is he in a state of blessedness?’
-Swedenborg answered: ‘No, he is not in heaven; he is still
-in the world of spirits, and torments himself continually
-with the idea of the restitution of all things.’ He ejaculated:
-‘My God! What! in the other world?’ Swedenborg replied:
-‘Certainly; a man takes with him his favorite inclinations
-and opinions, and it is very difficult to be divested of them.
-We ought, therefore, to lay them aside here.’ The merchant
-took his leave, perfectly convinced, and returned to
-Elberfeld.”</p>
-
-<p>An ambassador from Holland, named Martville, died at
-Stockholm. After his death, a considerable sum of money
-was demanded of his widow in payment of a debt. She felt
-certain the debt had been paid, but was unable to find the
-receipt for the money. Being advised to consult Swedenborg,
-who, she was told could converse with the dead whenever
-he pleased, she adopted the advice, more from curiosity
-than from a belief in his powers. The lady called on Swedenborg
-and told him her trouble; and he promised if he
-met her husband in the spiritual world, he would inquire of
-him about the matter. Eight days afterwards Martville
-appeared to his wife in a dream, and mentioned to her a<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_93"></a>[93]</span>
-private place in his cabinet, where she would not only find
-the receipt, but also a hair pin set with twenty brilliants
-which had been given up as lost. This happened about two
-o’clock in the morning. Full of joy, she arose and found
-them in the place designated. She returned again to rest,
-and slept till nine o’clock. About eleven Swedenborg was
-announced. His first remark, before Madame had time to
-speak, was, that he had, during the preceding night, seen
-several spirits, and among others her late husband. He had
-wished to converse with him, but Martville excused himself
-on the ground that he must go to discover to his wife something
-of importance. This account, attested by the lady
-herself, was noised through all Stockholm. It may be added
-that Madame desired to make Swedenborg a handsome
-present for his services, which he, of course, declined.</p>
-
-<p>Sometimes Swedenborg’s announcements of the states of
-the departed alarmed his auditors. We read of a case
-of this kind which took place on a voyage from Gottenburg
-to London. The vessel staying at Oresound, the Swedish
-Consul invited the officers of the custom house, together
-with several of the first people of the town, all anxious to
-see and know Swedenborg, to dine with him at his house.
-Being all seated at table, and none of them taking the liberty
-of addressing Swedenborg, who likewise was silent, the
-Consul thought it incumbent on him to break silence, and
-asked Swedenborg, as he could see and speak with the dead,
-whether he had seen Christian VI., King of Denmark, after
-his decease. To this he replied in the affirmative; adding,
-that when he saw him the first time, he was accompanied
-by a bishop or other prelate, who humbly begged the King’s
-pardon for the many errors into which he had led him by
-his counsels. A son of the deceased prelate happened to
-be present at the table: the Consul therefore fearing that
-Swedenborg might say something further to the disadvantage<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_94"></a>[94]</span>
-of the father, interrupted him, saying: “Sir, this is his
-son!” Swedenborg replied: “It may be, but what I am
-saying is true.”</p>
-
-<p>Such anecdotes might be greatly multiplied, but space
-forbids. No one, perhaps, has a lower idea of the worth of
-these stories, as testimonies to Swedenborg’s veracity, than
-the writer; yet they could not well be omitted from an account
-of his life. Gossip spread them far and wide in his
-own day, as is evidenced by the various forms in which they
-have come down to us; and any biographer would fail in
-his duty did he not show how the common world of men
-dealt with, and regarded Swedenborg. These anecdotes also
-in some degree manifest what a kind, affable, simple, and
-honest man Swedenborg was.</p>
-
-<p>Having finished the “Arcana Cœlestia,” Swedenborg’s pen
-yet knew no rest. In 1758 he published in London the five
-following works:—1. An Account of the Last Judgment
-and the Destruction of Babylon; showing that all the predictions
-in the Apocalypse are at this day fulfilled; being a
-relation of things heard and seen. 2. Concerning Heaven
-and its wonders, and concerning Hell, being a relation of
-things heard and seen. 3. On the White Horse mentioned
-in the Apocalypse. 4. On the Planets in our solar system,
-and on those in the Heavens; with an account of their inhabitants,
-and of their spirits and angels. 5. On the New
-Jerusalem and its Heavenly Doctrines, as revealed from
-heaven. Let us now examine these works in order.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_95"></a>[95]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XII">CHAPTER XII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>The Last Judgment.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>To the early reader of Swedenborg’s writings, few of his
-declarations appear stranger, at first, than his affirmation
-that the Last Judgment is past, that it took place in 1757.
-Yet although startling at first, it is a doctrine which, on
-closer acquaintance, readily comes within the grasp of reason
-and common sense; and we discover that all its early strangeness
-was owing to our having looked at it through the mist
-of prejudice and preconceived opinion.</p>
-
-<p>The treatise on the Last Judgment, (although, as to size,
-only a pamphlet,) is a most effective and masterly exposition
-of the nature of the end of the church, the new heavens,
-and the new earth of the Apocalypse.</p>
-
-<p>In the first place, it is shown that the day of the Last
-Judgment does not mean that of the destruction of the
-world; for neither the visible heaven nor the habitable
-earth will perish, but both will remain forever. The reason
-is that the heaven of angels is formed from the human race,
-all angels having lived the life of men, and none having
-been so created; and as the perfection of heaven increases to
-eternity with the increase of regenerate men from the world,
-it follows that the earth will never cease to exist, nor men to
-live and be born upon it. The world is the seminary of
-heaven. Heaven depends upon the world for its growth,
-increase, and perfection. Heaven could not exist without
-worlds.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_96"></a>[96]</span></p>
-
-<p>Heaven being formed from the human race, so likewise is
-Hell; all devils and satans having at one time been men on
-this or some other earth. “That is not first which is spiritual,
-but that which is natural.”</p>
-
-<p>These doctrines, it will be seen, militate against what are
-called orthodox opinions, which teach that angels were created
-before the world, and that no man can go to heaven or
-to hell before the time of the Last Judgment; when the
-souls of men having returned into their bodies, the visible
-world will be burned up; the sun and moon be quenched in
-nature’s night; and the stars, each surrounded with its own
-system of worlds, having first fallen upon this speck of a
-globe, are to be wiped out of existence. These common but
-crude and unscriptural ideas have afforded the best subjects
-for scoffing at the Christian religion which the skeptic could
-desire. For he triumphantly asks, How can so vast a heaven,
-and so many stars, with sun and moon, be destroyed
-and dissipated? And how can the stars fall from heaven
-upon the earth, when they are larger than the earth? How
-can men’s bodies, eaten up by worms, consumed by putrefaction,
-scattered to all winds, absorbed by vegetation, and
-again incorporated into other men’s systems, be re-collected
-for their souls? What is this day of Judgment? And has
-it not been expected for ages in vain? Together with many
-other such questions, all pertinent, but to which the church
-can give no rational answer.</p>
-
-<p>And yet ignorance on such subjects cannot be excused;
-for men might have known from the Word that heaven and
-hell are from mankind, and that man is raised up and lives
-immediately after death. Information on these subjects
-might have been obtained from the Lord’s words to the thief
-upon the cross, “Verily I say unto thee, To-day shalt thou
-be with me in Paradise;” and from those which he spoke
-concerning the rich man and Lazarus, that the one went to<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_97"></a>[97]</span>
-hell, and spoke with Abraham, and that the other went to
-heaven; and what the Lord told the Pharisees respecting the
-resurrection, that “God is not the God of the dead, but of
-the living.” And then we see how inconsistent men are with
-themselves on these subjects. A worthy church-member,
-who is a firm believer in the burning up of the world, and
-the resurrection of the dead at the Last Judgment, comes to
-his death-bed, and straightway all his doctrine passes into
-forgetfulness; and he talks of going home to glory in heaven,
-and being within a few hours of the angels. He dies; and
-his friends, as orthodox as himself, think of him as happy in
-heaven; and yet they profess to believe in the resurrection
-of his corrupt and diseased body. What strange inconsistency
-is this! But it is one of the marks of error, that it
-is always inconsistent with itself.</p>
-
-<p>The leading fact in Swedenborg’s doctrine of the Last
-Judgment, is, that it takes place in the spiritual world,
-where all men congregate after death. A judgment takes
-place in the world of spirits whenever a church comes to its
-end; that is, when its charity, and consequently its faith is
-dead, and all things that remain are mere empty forms of
-life. A judgment took place at the end of the Jewish
-church. For proof of this, we need only turn to the Gospel of
-<i>John</i>, (xii. 31,) where Jesus said: “<i>Now</i> is the judgment of
-this world: <i>now</i> shall the prince of this world be cast out.”
-We all know there was at that time no visible judgment in
-the natural world. Everything went on as before; yet, we
-learn from the Lord’s own lips, that a judgment was effected.</p>
-
-<p>It is a great mistake, and one which even the best of men
-labor under, to suppose that the soul of man exists alone,
-and independent of any influences but those that are external
-to him, and of which he is conscious. We would ask, Who
-ever saw a grain of matter independent of the law of<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_98"></a>[98]</span>
-gravitation,—that cause which binds it to kindred matter with a
-bond as indestructible as its own existence? It is the same with
-men’s souls. No man lives independent of spiritual association.
-Place a man in the middle of some distant and desolate
-island; yet he is not alone. Around his soul are the
-spirits of those who have left the world before him, who love
-as he loves, and think as he thinks. The minds of men and
-spirits are most closely and intimately conjoined; for in the
-universe of mind, as in the universe of matter, there is no
-such thing as isolation and independency. And what can
-be more philosophical than such a doctrine? The laws of matter
-represent the laws of spirit; in every particular there
-exists a perfect correspondence. As matter is everywhere
-bound to matter, and compacted in firm communion, so likewise
-are the minds of men to be regarded as a universe of
-atoms, bound together by loves and affections. In meditating
-on this subject, we must remember that spirit knows
-nothing of material space.</p>
-
-<p>The church had been declining from the days of the
-Apostles. Men had forsaken the pure spirit of the gospel,
-and had sought to hide their evils of life by doctrines and
-creeds formed from their own darkened understandings.
-The popedom had arisen; and in the black night of the
-dark ages, had established its fearful assumptions, and blasphemously
-invoked the name of the Highest to sanctify its
-crimes. The Reformation, the last flicker of an expiring
-candle, had indeed established free thought, but it failed in
-its highest aims; and in the erroneous doctrine of justification
-by faith alone, had deadened the consciences of men,
-and extinguished all aspirations after spiritual life. Last
-and worst of all, Atheism reared its horrid front, and openly
-manifested itself; yet what of it was open and confessed,
-was as nothing to what lay concealed even under the vestments
-of the church. Toward the middle of the last century,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_99"></a>[99]</span>
-Christendom had reached its lowest point of degradation;
-and any one who is anxious to test this affirmation of
-Swedenborg’s, need only turn to the history and literature of
-that period, and observe the selfishness, the negation and
-ridicule of everything pure and spiritual, the gross ignorance,
-the licentiousness and intemperance, and in fact the reduction
-of humanity to its lowest and most bestial condition.
-He will then understand the cry of the good, at that time,
-in the world of spirits, “How long, O Lord, holy and true,
-dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell
-on the earth?”</p>
-
-<p>It is to be noted that from the time of the Lord’s advent,
-when he effected the Judgment upon the Jewish church,
-there had been pouring into the world of spirits, in countless
-myriads, the souls of those who were full of evils and falsities,
-and who, collecting around terrestrial humanity, lay as
-thick clouds between it and heaven. Forming themselves
-into societies by spiritual affinities, the reformed churches
-were in the middle; the Romanists around them; the Mahommedans
-in a still outer ring; and the various Gentile
-nations constituted a vast circumference; while beyond all, lay
-the appearance of a sea as a boundary. Of the states of those
-associations, we have a most graphic picture in Swedenborg’s
-treatise; and no where else out of the Apocalypse, do we
-find a more thorough exposure of the internal atheism of
-the priests of Rome, their blasphemies and subtlety. But
-the time of the end had come; the world groaned to be delivered;
-and the eyes of Swedenborg were favored to behold
-the process of the great redemption.</p>
-
-<p>The vast concourse of these spirits, formed into societies,
-is what is meant in the Revelation by the first heaven and
-the first earth which passed away. The manner in which
-these societies were dissolved, Swedenborg describes as follows:—“Visitation
-was made by angels, and admonition<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_100"></a>[100]</span>
-given, and the good were singled out and separated by the
-heavenly ministers, agreeable to the Lord’s words, ‘He shall
-send his angels, and they shall gather together the elect from
-the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other;’ and
-again, ‘All nations shall be gathered together before the Son
-of Man; and he shall separate them one from another, as a
-shepherd divideth the sheep from the goats, and he shall set
-the sheep on the right hand, and the goats on the left.’” Then
-followed destruction. There were great earthquakes, and a
-vehement wind, which swept all before it. Then gulfs
-yawned, and seas appeared, into which the wicked threw
-themselves, and were drawn to their place in hell. “Then,”
-says Swedenborg, “I saw angelic spirits in great numbers
-rising from below, and received into heaven. They were
-the sheep who had been kept and guarded by the Lord,
-and who are understood in the Word by the bodies of saints
-which arose from their sepulchres and went into the holy
-city; and by the souls of those slain for the testimony of
-Jesus, and who were watching; and by those who were of
-the first resurrection.</p>
-
-<p>“After this, there was joy in heaven, and light in the world
-of spirits, such as was not before; and the interposing clouds
-between heaven and mankind being removed, a similar light
-also then arose on men in the world, giving them new
-enlightenment.”</p>
-
-<p>Such was the Last Judgment. Its centenary draws nigh;
-and how fruitful in good to mankind has been that century
-which is now drawing to a close! It is unnecessary to repeat
-the hackneyed phrases which tell of the progress of the
-world during the last hundred years. Every newspaper
-speaks of it. Everybody with open eyes observes it. It
-has become the universal opinion that the world is moving
-onwards and upwards; yet how few understand <i>why</i> the
-world is so moving. Men have yet to learn that effects can<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_101"></a>[101]</span>
-no more take place without adequate causes in the universe
-of mind than in the universe of matter. Nowhere out of
-Swedenborg can we find a description of those spiritual
-causes which are changing society and revolutionizing the
-whole world. We, who live in the dawn of the new era, can
-form, even in our highest states, but a faint conception of
-its coming glory. Yet we see in the wonderful movements
-of our age, in its growing benevolence, in its increasing intelligence
-and thoughtfulness, and in the prodigious advances
-that are making in every department of science and art, so
-many indubitable signs that the former things have passed
-away, and that the Lord is making all things new.</p>
-
-<p>Every one knows that in the Scripture, the second coming
-of the Lord is described as simultaneous with the Last
-Judgment. We will hereafter endeavor to prove that the
-Lord has indeed come, and will describe the manner of his
-coming.</p>
-
-<p>The reception of the doctrine of the Last Judgment is
-somewhat difficult, because the comprehension of it demands
-the understanding of many principles and spiritual laws unknown
-to the world at large, yet most worthy of any amount
-of labor requisite to master them. The remembrance of
-this fact will serve as an apology for any appearance of
-unfounded assumption in the outline of the doctrine we have
-given.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_102"></a>[102]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XIII">CHAPTER XIII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Heaven and Hell.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>The treatise on Heaven and Hell is among the most
-charming of Swedenborg’s writings. Its subjects possess a
-universal attraction; for, what believer in the immortality
-of man has not, at times, longed to penetrate the awful mysteries
-of the unseen world? And there is nothing unreasonable
-in the desire. True it is, that, until Swedenborg came,
-any but the most general knowledge of the nature of the
-future life had been withdrawn from mankind since the days
-of primeval innocence; yet not from anything hurtful in the
-knowledge itself, but simply because the sublime facts of the
-future state transcended the apprehension of men immersed
-in worldly loves and cares, and denying and ridiculing every
-idea which was not an object of sensual perception. For
-this reason the Lord said to his disciples: “I have yet many
-things to say unto you, but ye can not bear them now.”
-(<i>John</i> xvi. 12.) We frequently see this inability to “bear”
-things spiritual and divine, manifested in our own experience.
-We offer Swedenborg’s treatise, for perusal, to some
-man of science, full of self-confidence, with the laws and
-facts of the universe at his finger’s ends; or to some deeply-read
-theologian. The title page is read,—“Heaven and its
-Wonders, the World of Spirits, and Hell; being a relation
-of things heard and seen.” It is enough. “What nonsense!
-What foolishness! The lunatic! What could <i>he</i>
-know of heaven or hell? How could he get there? The<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_103"></a>[103]</span>
-impostor! None but a fool could write such a book!” And
-so on. The title page settles the whole question. Now what
-can be said in reply to these railers, of whom the world is
-full? How can one argue with, and combat, such inveterate
-prejudice? Yet these people are professing Christians.
-They profess to believe there is a heaven and a hell. But,
-does not their condemnation of Swedenborg betray a lurking
-infidelity in their hearts? If they really possessed a living
-faith in the existence of heaven and hell, it could not appear
-to them so utterly preposterous that some account of their
-nature might in these times have been revealed, through the
-abounding mercy of the Lord.</p>
-
-<p>But the world now contains many who are willing to receive,
-and able to understand, the truths of the future life.
-The Lord, who never allows his children to lack any good
-thing, has, in due season, given them, through Swedenborg,
-this precious and delightful volume. Let us briefly enumerate
-its important statements.</p>
-
-<p>The spiritual world divides itself into three great regions,—Heaven,
-the World of Spirits, and Hell.</p>
-
-<p>Heaven is formed of all who have loved the Lord on
-earth by living a life in accordance with his laws. The laws
-of spiritual life are known, more or less perfectly, in all nations,
-even among the heathen. The lowest of the Gentiles
-have some faint rays of the light of spiritual truth; and if
-they live in obedience thereto, regeneration, and consequently,
-heaven, is attainable by them. Yet heaven has its
-degrees of bliss. Good persons of every variety of character
-pass into it. But the promiscuous association of these
-different kinds of character would not be orderly, and could
-not be blissful. By the law of spiritual gravitation, (from
-which the law of natural gravitation is but a derivation, and
-of which it is a type and image,) all who possess similar affections
-and intelligence are drawn together, and co-ordinated<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_104"></a>[104]</span>
-in the most blissful harmony. The infinite variety of heaven
-thus arranges itself, in general, into two kingdoms; specifically
-into three heavens; and in particular, into innumerable
-societies. The two kingdoms are respectively called
-celestial and spiritual. The angels forming the celestial
-kingdom are characterized by their exceeding love of the
-Lord and of goodness; and the angels who form the spiritual
-kingdom are distinguished by their exceeding love of their
-neighbor and of truth. The celestial angels are immensely
-wiser than the spiritual, and their blessedness is ineffable.
-Specifically there are three heavens, perfectly distinct, called
-the first heaven, the second or middle heaven, and the third
-or highest heaven; or they may be called external, internal,
-and inmost; or natural, spiritual, and celestial. Of these
-three heavens the highest or third, together with the internal
-of the first or lowest heaven, forms the celestial kingdom;
-and the middle or second, together with the external of the
-first or lowest heaven, forms the spiritual kingdom. These
-three heavens and two kingdoms, arising out of the varieties
-of the human mind, are not arbitrary distinctions. The external,
-first, or natural heaven, is formed of those who, from
-a principle of obedience and duty, live in accordance with
-the Divine will. The second, spiritual, or middle heaven, is
-formed of such as love truth, delight in things intellectual,
-and at the same time are in disinterested love to the neighbor.
-The inmost, third, or celestial heaven, is formed of
-those who, full of love to the Lord, are in innocence. These
-celestial angels, gifted with the highest wisdom and peace,
-yet full of humility, indefinitely exceed all beneath them in
-beauty and wisdom. The existence and order of the three
-heavens was represented by the courts of the Jewish temple.
-The celebrated Oberlin, a diligent reader of Swedenborg,
-had a plan of the courts of the temple hung upon the walls
-of his church, by which he taught his hearers, that, according<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_105"></a>[105]</span>
-to their humility, piety, fidelity, and love of being useful
-to each other, would be their elevation in the Lord’s kingdom,
-either to the first, second, or third heaven. We think
-that no one, in whom reign the heavenly principles of “love”
-to the Lord and the neighbor; “joy” in duty under all circumstances;
-“peace” in every change of state; “long-suffering”
-under all provocations; “gentleness” of behaviour;
-“goodness” of disposition, ever manifesting itself in good
-actions; “faith” or truth, believed, loved, and thence trusted
-in; “meekness” in doing and in suffering; “temperance” both
-in external and internal delights, Gal. v. 22, would be an
-unwilling inhabitant of such a heaven as Swedenborg describes.
-Is not this at least presumptive evidence that he has
-spoken truly?</p>
-
-<p>The three heavens are further subdivided into innumerable
-societies, some smaller, and some larger; some consisting
-of myriads of angels, and some of hundreds. Their association
-into societies, is a result of similarity of character, which
-similarity is imaged in their faces; and a general likeness
-of countenance is observed among the angels who form one
-society. All who are in similar love know each other, just
-as men in the world know their kindred, relations, and
-friends; and thus, as it were, spontaneously associated, they
-feel at home and in freedom, and thence in the full delight
-of their life. From this it also follows that angels who differ
-much are far apart; and few depart out of their own society
-into another, because to go out from their own society is like
-going out of themselves, or out of their own life, and passing
-into another which is not so agreeable. Nevertheless all the
-societies of heaven are bound together in one perfect form,
-which is strictly human.</p>
-
-<p>All angels are in the human form, and are just such men
-and women as they were on earth, except that they have
-rejected the material body. That we should have to write<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_106"></a>[106]</span>
-and enforce such truisms—for such they must appear to a
-mind really rational,—is owing to the strange and ridiculous
-fancies that are commonly entertained on this subject. We
-often hear the departed talked of as shades, and thought
-of as minds without forms, or mere thinking principles
-composed of some sort of ethereal vapor; and when artists
-draw them, we see perhaps an exquisitely beautiful human
-form, but disfigured with large feathery wings, which, having
-no adequate muscles, would have no power of motion. None
-of these vague, shadowy, and erroneous ideas do we find in
-the Bible. The angels seen by Abraham, Lot, Manoah, the
-prophets, and the Lord’s disciples, were all seen as men, and
-talked with as men. Our author writes thus explicitly on
-this subject. “The angelic form is in every respect human;
-angels have faces, eyes, ears, breasts, arms, hands, and feet;
-they see, hear, and converse with each other; and, in a
-word, no external attribute of man is wanting, except the
-natural body.”</p>
-
-<p>And now comes a doctrine which on a first view may
-appear very mystical, and yet when pondered over, and
-understood, commends itself to our belief by a thousand
-irresistible evidences drawn from analogy, and confirmed
-by right reason. It is, that every society of heaven is in
-the human form; and that the universal heaven, viewed
-collectively, is also in the human form; and is called by
-Swedenborg the Grand or Greatest [Maximus] Man. Wilkinson
-well expresses this sublime truth. “Heaven,” he
-says, “is supremely human—nay more, it is one man. As
-the members of the body make one person, so before God,
-all good men make one humanity: every society of the
-angels is a heavenly man in a lesser form, and every angel
-in a least. The reason is, that God himself, (the Lord Jesus
-Christ,) is a Divine Man, and He shapes His heaven into
-His own image and likeness, even as He made Adam. The<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_107"></a>[107]</span>
-oneness of heaven comes from God’s unity: its manhood from
-His humanity. Heaven has, therefore, all the members,
-organs, and viscera of a man; its angel inhabitants, every
-one, are in some province of the Grand Man. Indefinite
-myriads of us go to a fibre of its humanity. Some are in
-the province of the brain; some in that of the lungs; some
-in that of the heart; some in that of the belly; some are in
-the legs and arms; and all, wherever humanized, that is to
-say, located in humanity, perform spiritually the offices
-of that part of the body whereto they correspond. They all
-work together, however spaced apparently, just as the parts
-of a single man. Their space is but their palpable liberty,
-and they touch the human atoms, more closely, by offices
-which unite them in God, than the contiguous fibres of our
-flesh.” Every society of heaven also increases in number
-daily, and as it increases, it becomes more perfect; and from
-its perfection the universal heaven becomes more perfect,
-because heaven is composed of societies. Since increasing
-numbers make heaven more perfect, it is evident how much
-<i>they</i> are deceived who believe that heaven will be closed
-when it becomes full. On the contrary, heaven will never be
-closed, for the greater its fullness, the greater its perfection;
-and therefore the angels desire nothing more earnestly than
-to receive new comers.</p>
-
-<p>This part of our subject would require considerable expansion
-to make it intelligible to minds that have never meditated
-on these high themes, and whose theological education
-has perverted all perception of the truth on these matters.
-The subject is enticing, but our limits command restraint.</p>
-
-<p>It was a remark of a profane wit and epicure that “as to
-heaven, he had no great longing, as he could not see what
-great pleasure there could be in sitting on a cloud and
-singing psalms to eternity.” We have in this expression a
-thought which we know to be common to many minds, but<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_108"></a>[108]</span>
-respect for the externals of religion forbids its expression.
-The general belief respecting the nature of life in heaven, is
-so vague, and contains so much of clouds and psalm-singing,
-that it is not to be wondered at that some free and daring
-spirits should openly avow their preference for the more
-substantial realities of this life. And is it not a pity that
-the divine glories and delights of the heavenly life should
-become so veiled in mystery as to lose their attraction, and
-cease to be desirable? With the exception of the church’s
-ignorance of the humanity, unity, and divinity of its Saviour
-and Lord, no surer evidence could be adduced of its consummation,
-than its inability to answer the simplest child’s
-questions as to the nature of life in heaven. Let us be
-thankful that man’s utmost wants, in this respect, are satisfied
-in the writings of that New Church which the Lord is
-now raising up, and of which Swedenborg was the divinely-appointed
-herald.</p>
-
-<p>The sun of heaven is the Lord. The light of heaven is
-the divine truth, and its heat the divine love; both proceeding
-from the Lord as a sun. The sun of this world is not
-seen in heaven. Nature commences from the sun of this
-world, and everything which is produced from it, and subsists
-by it, is called natural; but the spiritual world in which
-heaven is, is above nature, and entirely distinct from it, although
-it is ever to be remembered that nature is a derivation
-from spirit, and communicates with spirit by correspondences.
-We shall have more to say on this conjunction
-yet perfect separation, between nature and spirit, when we
-come to speak of the doctrine of degrees.</p>
-
-<p>The sun of heaven, or the divine sphere of glory surrounding
-the Lord, the “light which no man can approach unto,”
-1 Tim. vi. 6, appears variously to the angels of heaven according
-to their states of love and intelligence. To the
-angels of the third heaven, the sun appears fiery and flaming;<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_109"></a>[109]</span>
-to the angels of the second heaven, white and brilliant;
-while to those of the first heaven its light is more subdued
-and veiled with clouds, yet at intervals bursting forth and
-pouring his glorious radiance upon them. Although the
-Lord is thus seen by the angels as a sun above them, yet at
-times He appears in their midst, in an angelic form, and
-with a resplendent countenance. What tongue can describe
-the rapt adoration and ineffable joy which must thrill
-angelic bosoms on these occasions!</p>
-
-<p>Heaven has its times and its seasons, but they are not like
-those of earth. In heaven there is no winter and no night.
-The times and seasons of heaven are consequences of the
-variations of the states of angelic minds. While to all appearance
-they are objective as on earth, they are in reality
-strictly subjective. The external changes of light and heat
-correspond to the internal changes of love and wisdom in
-the angelic mind. Now as the angels are sometimes in a
-state of intense love, and sometimes in a state of love not so
-intense, morning, noon, evening, and twilight, exist in heaven
-as the external emblems of these changes. Without such
-changes life would lose its zest. Eternal uniformity would
-be eternal dullness.</p>
-
-<p>Since angels are men, and live together in society like
-men on earth, therefore they have garments, houses, and
-other things similar to those which exist on earth, but of
-course infinitely more beautiful and perfect. The garments
-of the angels correspond to their intelligence. The garments
-of some glitter as with flame, and those of others are
-resplendent as with light; others are of various colors, and
-some white and opaque. The angels of the inmost heaven
-are naked because they are in innocence, and nakedness corresponds
-to innocence. It is because garments represent
-states of wisdom that they are so much spoken of in the
-Word, in relation to the church and good men. Thus in<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_110"></a>[110]</span>
-Isaiah liii. 1, “Awake, put on strength, O Zion; put on thy
-<i>beautiful garments</i>, O Jerusalem.” And in Ezekiel xv. 10,
-the Lord says of his church: “I girded thee about with fine
-linen, and covered thee with silk.” And in the Apocalypse
-iii. 4, 5, it is said: “They who have not defiled their <i>garments</i>,
-shall walk with Me in <i>white</i>, for they are worthy. He that
-overcometh, the same shall be clothed in <i>white raiment</i>.”
-What a depth of meaning appears in these passages when we
-remember the spiritual signification of garments!</p>
-
-<p>“The garments of the angels,” writes Swedenborg, “do not
-merely appear to be garments, but they really are garments;
-for they not only see them, but feel them, and have different
-ones, which they take off and put on, laying aside those which
-are not in use, and resuming them when they come into use
-again. That they are clothed with a variety of garments, I
-have witnessed a thousand times; and when I inquired whence
-they obtained them, they told me ‘from the Lord,’ and that
-they receive them as gifts, and that they are sometimes clothed
-without knowing how. They also said that their garments
-are changed according to the changes of their state.”</p>
-
-<p>Since there are societies in heaven, and the angels live as
-men, it follows that they have habitations, various, like all
-else in heaven, according to the degree of love and wisdom
-in which they are principled. No words are like Swedenborg’s
-own on this subject. “Whenever I have conversed
-with the angels mouth to mouth, I have been present with
-them in their habitations, which are exactly like the habitations
-on earth called houses, but more beautiful. They contain
-chambers, parlors [conclavia], and bed-chambers, in
-great numbers; courts also, and around them gardens,
-shrubberies, and fields. Where the angels are consociated
-their habitations are contiguous, or near to each other, and
-arranged in the form of a city, with streets, ways, and
-squares, exactly like the cities on our earth.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_111"></a>[111]</span></p>
-
-<p>“I have seen palaces in heaven, magnificent beyond description.
-Their upper parts were refulgent as if they were
-pure gold, and their lower parts as if they were precious
-stones: some were more splendid than others, and the splendor
-without was equaled by the magnificence within. The
-apartments were ornamented with decorations which neither
-language nor science can adequately describe. On the south
-were paradises, in which all things were similarly resplendent;
-for in some places the leaves of the trees were like
-silver, and the fruits like gold, while the colors of the flowers
-which were arranged in beds, appeared like rainbows; at the
-boundaries appeared other palaces, which terminated the
-view. Such is the architecture of heaven that one might say
-it is the very art itself; nor is this to be wondered at, because
-the art itself is from heaven. The angels said that
-such things, and innumerable others still more perfect, are
-presented before their eyes by the Lord, but that nevertheless
-they delight their minds more than their eyes, because
-in everything they see correspondences of things divine.</p>
-
-<p>“The angels who constitute the Lord’s celestial kingdom,
-dwell for the most part in elevated places, or mountains;
-those who form the spiritual kingdom, on hills; but those
-who are in the lowest parts of heaven, in places which appear
-as rocks. There are also angels who do not live consociated,
-but separate. These dwell in the midst of heaven,
-and are the best of the angels.</p>
-
-<p>“The houses in which the angels dwell, are not constructed
-by hand, like houses in the world, but are given them freely
-by the Lord, according to their reception of good and truth.
-All things whatsoever which the angels possess, they hold as
-gifts from the Lord; and they are supplied with everything
-they need.”</p>
-
-<p>We thus learn that in heaven there are not external, physical,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_112"></a>[112]</span>
-or mental occupations to support bodily wants, as in
-this world.</p>
-
-<p>It was said above that the angels have not wings, as is
-commonly supposed. Their power of progression far exceeds
-anything that wings could supply. They have no idea of
-space, such as we have in the world. All who are of like
-disposition spontaneously associate together in the spiritual
-world. It thus follows that those are near each other who
-are in a similar state, and distant who are in a dissimilar
-state; and that what appears to be space in heaven is merely
-an external appearance, representative of internal differences
-of mind. From this cause alone the heavens are distinct
-from each other, and each society of heaven, and every individual
-in each society. Hence also the hells are altogether
-separated from the heavens.</p>
-
-<p>From the same cause, any one in the spiritual world appears
-to be present if another intensely desires his presence;
-for from that desire he sees him in thought, and puts himself
-in his state. Again one person is removed from another
-in proportion as he holds him in aversion; for all aversion is
-from contrariety of the affections and disagreement of the
-thoughts; therefore many who appear together in one place
-in the spiritual world, so long as they agree, separate as soon
-as they disagree.</p>
-
-<p>Further: when any one goes from one place to another,
-whether it be in his own city, in the courts, or the gardens,
-or to others out of his own city, he arrives sooner when he
-has a strong desire to be there, and later when his desire is
-less strong; the way itself being lengthened or shortened
-according to his desire of arrival. Hence again it is evident
-that distances, and consequently spaces, exist with the
-angels altogether according to the state of their minds.</p>
-
-<p>These principles settle that often asked question, “Shall
-we know each other in the future life?” We shall, if we<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_113"></a>[113]</span>
-are in the same state as to love and truth; but if in different
-states, we shall not, but shall be separate; and, moreover,
-we shall have no desire for acquaintance. The only
-friendships in heaven are those formed on the ground of
-similarity of character. If this similarity does not exist,—with
-the exception perhaps of a short meeting in the world
-of spirits—death is an everlasting, though in such case not a
-mournful, farewell.</p>
-
-<p>There are governments in heaven, various according to
-the varied classes of mind which compose the heavenly societies.
-The government of mutual love is the only government
-which exists in heaven. Governors in heaven are
-distinguished by love and wisdom more than others, and by
-willing well to all from love; and knowing, from their superior
-wisdom, how to realize the good they purpose. They
-do not domineer, and command imperiously, but minister
-and serve: not making themselves greater than others, but
-less; for they put their own good last, and the good of their
-society first: nevertheless they enjoy honor and glory; for
-they dwell in the midst of their society, in a more elevated
-situation than others, and inhabit magnificent palaces; but
-they accept glory and honor, not for the sake of themselves,
-but for the sake of obedience; for all in heaven know that
-they enjoy honor and glory from the Lord, and that, therefore
-they ought to be obeyed. These are the things which
-are meant by the Lord’s words to his disciples: “Whosoever
-will be chief among you, let him be your servant; even
-as the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to
-minister.” Matthew xx. 27, 28. “He that is greatest
-among you, let him be as the younger: and he that is chief,
-as he that doth serve.” Luke xxii. 26. A similar government
-prevails also in every house in heaven; for in every
-house there is a master, and there are servants, the master
-loving the servants, and the servants loving the master, so<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_114"></a>[114]</span>
-that they serve each other from love. The master teaches
-the servants how they ought to live, and directs what
-they ought to do, while the servants obey, and perform their
-duties.</p>
-
-<p>Divine worship performed in heaven, is much the same in
-externals, as on earth. In the heavens, as on earth, there
-are doctrines, preachings, and temples. As the angels have
-houses and palaces, so also they have temples in which
-preaching is performed. Such things exist in heaven because
-the angels are continually perfecting in wisdom and
-love. But real divine worship in the heavens does not consist,
-any more than on earth, in frequenting temples, and
-hearing sermons, but in a life of love and usefulness; sermons
-and prayers being only means whereby the mind is enlightened
-to perform its various duties. “To work is to pray,” is
-a heavenly precept which we should all do well to engrave
-upon our hearts.</p>
-
-<p>The sermons of heaven are fraught with such wisdom that
-nothing of the kind in the world can be compared with
-them. They are all drawn from the Word. The same
-Bible that we read here, the angels read in heaven; but to
-them it is a very different book from what it is to us.
-Where we read and think of earthly and material things,
-they read and think of spiritual and divine things. To them
-its spiritual and celestial senses are as open as the natural
-sense is to us. From the Word they derive their highest
-wisdom; and through continual converse with it, they grow
-wiser and wiser day by day. The Word is the wisdom of
-the Lord, and eternity can not exhaust it.</p>
-
-<p>All infants go to heaven, whether born within the church
-or out of it; whether of pious parents or wicked ones.
-When infants die, they are still infants in the other life.
-They are not angels, but become angels. Every one, on his
-decease, is in a similar state of life to that in which he was<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_115"></a>[115]</span>
-in the world; an infant in the state of infancy, a boy in a
-state of boyhood, and a youth, a man, or an old man, in the
-state of youth, of manhood, or of age; but the state of every
-one is afterwards changed. As soon as infants are raised
-from the dead, which takes place immediately after decease,
-they are carried up into heaven, and delivered to the care
-of angels of the female sex, who in the life of the body
-loved infants tenderly, and at the same time loved God.
-By these good angels, they are educated and brought up
-until they attain a suitable age, when they are transferred
-to other teachers. They grow up and become young men
-and women; are instructed in wisdom, and trained in the
-duties of the heavenly life: and when their character is
-fully developed, they become settled in some society, either
-of the celestial or spiritual kingdom, in agreement with their
-inherited genius or disposition. What a delightful faith is
-this! Do not its beauty and rationality prove its truthfulness?</p>
-
-<p>Many persons imagine that infants are forever infants in
-heaven, and that there is indeed something infantile about
-all angels. This idea probably arises from the pictures
-which are frequently seen, in which angels are drawn as
-infants. But this is a great mistake. Children in heaven
-grow up into young men and women, and the aged return to
-the freshness of early manhood. They who are in heaven
-are continually advancing to the spring-time of life, and the
-more thousands of years they live, the more delightful and
-happy is the spring to which they attain; and this progression
-goes on to eternity. Good women who have died old and
-worn out with age, after a succession of years come more and
-more into the flower of youth, and into a beauty which
-exceeds all the conceptions of beauty which can be formed
-from what the eye has seen. In a word, <i>to grow old in heaven
-is to grow young</i>. It is worthy of note, that the human<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_116"></a>[116]</span>
-form of every man after death, is beautiful in proportion as
-his love and practice of divine truths is interior. The
-angels of the inmost heaven are consequently the most
-beautiful, because their love of truth is the deepest, and
-their lives are the most perfect. “I have seen,” says Swedenborg,
-“the faces of angels of the third heaven, which
-were so beautiful, that no painter, with the utmost power of
-art, could depict even a thousandth part of their light and
-life; but the faces of the angels of the lowest heaven may,
-in some measure, be adequately depicted.”</p>
-
-<p>It is believed by many in the world that heaven is a place
-of idleness, full of refined sensual delights, of pleasant
-sights and harmonious sounds; in short, some such place as
-a laborious tradesman, struggling for a fortune, fancies he
-shall enjoy when his gains shall have enabled him to “<i>retire</i>.”
-But this is a great mistake. Man’s nature remains the same
-in heaven as on earth; and who has not felt that his happiest
-moments are not those of mere pleasure and idleness,
-but those in which he was rendering himself most eminently
-useful? Happiness is as little consonant with idleness in
-heaven as on earth. Jesus himself said: “My Father
-worketh hitherto, and I work.” John v. 17. The angels are
-employed. All the delights of heaven are conjoined with
-uses, and are inherent in them. In proportion to an angel’s
-usefulness, is his bliss. Some spirits, we read, conceived the
-opinion that heavenly happiness consisted in a life of ease,
-and in being served by others; but they were told that happiness
-by no means consists in mere rest from employment,
-because every one would then desire to take away the happiness
-of others to promote his own; and since all would
-have the same desire, none would be happy; that such a life
-would not be active but indolent, and that indolence makes
-life torpid; and that without activity there can be no happiness,
-and that <i>cessation from employment is only for the sake<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_117"></a>[117]</span>
-of recreation</i>, that a man <i>may return</i>, with new vigor, to the
-<i>activity</i> of his life. They who entertained the idea that
-heavenly joy consists in a life of indolence, and sucking in
-eternal delight without employment, were allowed some experience
-of such a life; and they perceived that it is most
-sorrowful, and that all joy being destroyed, they would after
-a time loathe and nauseate it.</p>
-
-<p>Some spirits who believed that heavenly joy consists solely
-in praising and celebrating God, were instructed that to
-praise and celebrate God is not properly an active life; and
-that God has no need of praise and celebration. The Lord’s
-will is that all should perform uses; and the angels testify
-that in the performance of good works is the highest freedom,
-conjoined with ineffable delights.</p>
-
-<p>From all this it follows that heaven is full of employments,
-in comparison with which those of the world are few. There
-are societies whose occupation consists in taking care of
-infants; other societies, whose employment is to instruct and
-educate them as they grow up; others which in like manner
-instruct and educate the young; others which instruct the
-simply good from the Christian world, and lead them in the
-ways of heaven; others which perform the same office to
-Gentile nations; others which defend novitiate spirits, or
-those who are newly arrived from the world, from the
-infestations of evil spirits; some also are attendant on those
-who are preparing in the world of spirits for heaven; and
-some are present with those who are in hell, to restrain them
-from tormenting each other beyond limit: there are also
-others who attend those who are being raised from the dead.
-In general, angels of every society are sent to men, that they
-may guard them, and withdraw them from evil affections
-and consequent evil thoughts, and inspire them with good
-affections, so far as they are willing to receive them. All
-these employments are performed by the Lord through their<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_118"></a>[118]</span>
-instrumentality; and hence it is that by <i>angels</i> in the Word,
-in its internal sense, are not meant <i>angels</i>, but something
-of the Lord; and for the same reason, <i>angels</i> in the Word
-are called <i>gods</i>.</p>
-
-<p>These employments of the angels are their general employments,
-but every one has his own particular duty; for every
-general use is composed of innumerable others, which are
-called mediate, ministering, and subservient uses. But in
-heaven there are so many offices that it is impossible to
-enumerate them on account of their multitude. All angels
-feel delight in their employment derived from the love
-of use, and none from the love of self or of gain; nor is any
-one influenced by the love of gain for the sake of his maintenance,
-because all the necessaries of life are freely given
-them; their habitations, their clothes, their food.</p>
-
-<p>It is De Quincey, we think, who accuses Swedenborg
-of sensualizing heaven, and reducing its sublime glories to
-the common order of things in this world. The assertion
-could only have been made through want of personal
-acquaintance with the writings of Swedenborg. No one can
-use the words, Isaiah lxiv. 4, quoted by the Apostle, 1 Cor.
-ii. 9: “Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
-entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath
-prepared for them that love him,” with more fervor and
-truth than the New Church preacher. Everywhere we are
-told by Swedenborg, that the joys and delights of heaven
-transcend the highest power of language to express; everywhere
-we are told that our highest ideas formed from
-natural things, fall indefinitely short of the common realities
-of the heavenly life. Yet we also learn that the common
-humanities and pleasures of this life are not lost in the next;
-and that as men and women we carry with us to our eternal
-home every faculty of thought and affection which we
-possess here. In this most rational doctrine there is gain<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_119"></a>[119]</span>
-every way. In thinking of heaven we know we can never
-overrate its bliss, think as we will; and yet with this idea is
-associated nothing of dreamy vagueness. We feel that as
-we live well we are but walking onwards to a pleasant home,
-in which all that is truest and best in this life will go with
-us. What stronger incentive can a man have to a pure and
-religious life than this divine faith. Entertaining it, with
-what feeling may he, at the close of life, utter the poet’s
-words,—</p>
-
-<div class="poetry-container">
-<div class="poetry">
- <div class="stanza">
- <div class="verse indent12">“Draw near, sweet death;</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">Come raise me into life!”</div>
- </div>
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<p>The condition of admission into heaven is the possession
-of a soul whose existence is a continual fulfillment of those
-two commandments on which the Lord says, “hang all the
-law and the prophets”—love to God, and love to man. To
-enter heaven, we must habitually place self last, and our
-neighbor first; and unless we can do this, we can never
-know eternal bliss. Now we are born into this world selfish;
-and hence it is truly said we are hereditarily depraved. It
-is the Divine will to take all to heaven. To do this, it is
-necessary that we should be divested of our corrupt hereditary
-nature; as the Lord said to Nicodemus: “Verily, verily, I
-say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot see
-the kingdom of God.” This regeneration of mind, this
-change from a supreme love of self, to a supreme love
-of God and our neighbor, is, of necessity, a gradual work.
-It is not accomplished in a day, nor in a month, nor in a
-year. Like all Divine works, it proceeds gradually, step by
-step; “first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn
-in the ear.” The regeneration of man is a Divine work, and
-as the Divine end in the creation of man was the formation
-of heaven out of the human race, the Lord’s providence is
-unceasingly exerted to draw man out of evil, by all means<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_120"></a>[120]</span>
-consonant with the maintenance of the inalienable freedom
-of his will. It thus follows that the Lord, in all his dealings
-with man, has respect solely to his eternal state, and amid
-all the apparent accidents and vicissitudes of life, he is
-present, bending them and making them all conduce to
-man’s everlasting peace. Life in this world, its cares, trials,
-pleasures, comforts, friendships, sympathies, and affections,
-form the divinely-appointed regenerative process; and those
-who will only believe this great truth, and submit to the
-Divine leading, will encounter nothing in life but what is
-good for them; and existence here, however bitter and
-painful at times, will resolve itself into a series of lessons
-devised by infinite wisdom to uproot all latent and known
-evils, transforming the patient sufferer into a true child
-of God. The Lord permits one man to be rich, powerful,
-and famous, and another to be afflicted with disease and
-perplexed with poverty; one to have a settled and calm
-peace of mind, while another is tried and tormented with
-doubts and anxieties; nor for any ultimate purpose on earth,
-but solely as a means of spiritual regeneration,—as a means
-of making man happy in the eternal life to come. All
-man’s states are under the minute guardianship of the Lord;
-and each day comes round with its circle of pleasant and
-unpleasant occurrences, often, apparently, the result of accident
-and chance, but in truth all provided of the Divine
-Providence for the eradication of evil, and the growth and
-nurture of goodness. There is no trial encountered, no
-circumstance met, or cross endured, but has its eternal issue;
-and man’s conduct in relation to it is looked upon by the
-Lord with a love and interest infinitely transcending our
-highest conception. All has been foreseen; and these daily
-recurring tasks are appointed by that wisdom which guides
-the stars in their courses, and by that love which requires
-eternity to satisfy the ardor with which it would bless.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_121"></a>[121]</span>
-With what dignity does such a faith clothe existence!
-What earnestness and celestial patience must it infuse into
-life!</p>
-
-<p>From all that has now been said, it will be very evident
-that heaven is not a gift of immediate Divine mercy, to be
-obtained by a verbal confession of faith at the hour of death.
-If man could be saved by immediate mercy, all would be
-saved; even the inhabitants of hell, and hell itself would not
-exist; because the Lord is Mercy itself, Love itself, and
-Good itself, and wills the salvation of all, and the damnation
-of no one. But man’s spirit is substantial; and if
-formed to evil, to change it would be equivalent to annihilation.
-“The angels declare that it were easier to change a
-bat into a dove, or an owl into a bird of paradise, than to
-change an infernal spirit into an angel of heaven.” “Ample
-experience,” writes Swedenborg, “enables me to testify that
-it is impossible to implant the life of heaven in those who
-have led an opposite life in the world. There were some
-who believed that they should easily receive divine truths
-after death, when they heard them from the angels; and that
-they would believe them then, amend their lives, and be received
-into heaven; and the experiment was made on great
-numbers of them, in order that they might be convinced
-that repentance is not possible after death. Some understood
-the truths they heard, and seemed to receive them; but
-as soon as they returned to the life of their love, they rejected
-them, and even argued against them. Some rejected
-them instantly, from entire unwillingness to hear them; but
-others were desirous that <i>the life of the love they had contracted
-in the world, might be taken away from them; and that angelic
-life, the life of heaven, might be infused in its place</i>. This was
-permitted; but when the life of their love was taken away,
-they lay as if dead, and deprived of all their faculties.
-From this it was manifest that no one’s life can possibly be<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_122"></a>[122]</span>
-changed after death, that evil life can not be changed into
-good life, nor the life of an infernal into that of an angel;
-because every spirit is from head to foot of the same quality
-as his love, and therefore of the same quality as his life; and
-consequently to transmute his life into its opposite is to
-destroy him altogether.” All this goes to confirm the Lord’s
-declaration before quoted, “Except a man be born again, he
-can not see the kingdom of God.” On no other terms can
-heavenly bliss be gained.</p>
-
-<p>We now come to speak of the World of Spirits, which
-Swedenborg thus defines: “The world of spirits is neither
-heaven nor hell, but an intermediate place or state between
-both, into which man enters immediately after death; and
-then after a certain period, the duration of which is determined
-by the quality of his life in the world, he is either
-elevated into heaven, or cast into hell.</p>
-
-<p>“The spirits in the world of spirits are immensely numerous,
-because that world is the general assembly of all immediately
-after their resurrection, and all are examined there
-and prepared for their final abode; but the length of their
-sojourn in that world is not in all cases the same. Some
-only enter it, and are immediately taken up into heaven, or
-cast down into hell; some remain there a few weeks, and
-others several years, but none (since the Last Judgment,)
-more than thirty years.”</p>
-
-<p>A belief in the existence of an intermediate state has been
-entertained in all times and churches, except among Protestants,
-who, in their anxiety to divest themselves of every
-remnant of Popery, rejected the doctrine entirely, through
-aversion to the follies of Purgatory. A return to the truth
-is however slowly taking place; not a few Protestant divines
-having expressed their faith in the existence of Hades, or
-the intermediate state alluded to in the literal sense of Scripture.
-But the world of spirits is not to be thought of as a<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_123"></a>[123]</span>
-revived idea of Purgatory. The soul of no man is changed
-in the world of spirits. “As the tree falls so it lies.” The
-discipline of this life is perfected at death, and its opportunities
-never return. The world of spirits is a place where
-the externals of man are brought into correspondence with
-his internals; for no one, either in heaven or in hell, is
-allowed to have a divided mind, understanding one thing
-and willing another. What any one wills, he must understand,
-and what he understands he must will; therefore he who
-wills good in heaven, must understand truth; and he who
-wills evil in hell, must understand falsities. On this account
-also, falses are removed from the good in the world of spirits,
-and there are given them truths which agree and harmonize
-with their good; but truths are removed from the evil,
-and they take to themselves falses which agree and harmonize
-with their evil. Let us explain this subject further.</p>
-
-<p>We suppose the generality of our readers will admit that
-countless thousands of good men and women among the
-Mahommedans, Chinese, Hindoos, and all the heathen nations,
-who live according to the measure of their light, are
-saved and taken to heaven. But it is very evident that they
-can not go to heaven carrying with them false notions on
-religious subjects, and knowing nothing of that good Lord
-into whose kingdom they are about to pass. They must be
-instructed. They must have errors removed from their
-minds, and truths implanted in their stead. Time is required
-to effect these changes, and the world of spirits is the
-school in which the process is accomplished. Instruction in
-truth is readily received by the simply good; and after being
-enlightened and purified from falsity, they are led to their
-eternal homes among the blessed—to those of a disposition
-and order of mind like themselves.</p>
-
-<p>Then, again, among Christians, there are many who die
-with slight failings pertaining to them, with infirmities of<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_124"></a>[124]</span>
-temper, with bad habits of one kind and another; yet who are
-really sound-hearted and good men. Their lot can not be
-hell; yet with these flaws in their character, their presence
-in heaven could not be pleasant, because their state of mind
-is at variance with the perfect order and peace of heaven.
-Such, then, remain in the world of spirits, passing through
-trials, and temptations, and sufferings, until they reject all
-that is disorderly and impure. The processes by which this
-removal of external evils is accomplished, are frequently
-extremely painful, and extend over many years. Their
-removal might with less difficulty have been accomplished
-in the present life. The Lord warns us of this in these
-words: “Agree with thine adversary quickly, while thou art
-in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver
-thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer,
-and thou be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, Thou
-shalt by no means come out thence till thou hast paid the
-uttermost farthing.” Matthew v. 25, 26. Our adversary is
-the truth. Truth is ever an adversary to the evil. Elijah
-the prophet represented the Divine Truth. When he approached
-the wicked Ahab, Ahab cried: “Hast thou found
-me, O mine enemy?” “In the way with him” is in the
-present life; and the “prison” is the world of spirits, often
-so called in the Word, out of which we shall not be delivered
-until entirely divested of selfish affections, and false principles
-of thought. How practical, thus viewed, becomes our Lord’s
-advice! But without a knowledge of the world of spirits,
-and the spiritual sense of Scripture, it is quite mystical and
-unintelligible.</p>
-
-<p>There are many in the Christian world who have confirmed
-their minds in false ideas on many religious doctrines.
-With such erroneous ideas they can not enter heaven, where
-truth alone prevails. They therefore remain in the world
-of spirits until, through instruction, they see and reject the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_125"></a>[125]</span>
-false persuasions they had contracted on earth. In some
-cases, where false doctrine has been deeply reasoned upon,
-and ground, as it were, into the mind, the process of its
-removal and rejection is attended with deep and prolonged
-suffering.</p>
-
-<p>As the good reject all false ideas in the world of spirits,
-so the evil cast off all true ones. It may be asked, Why?
-Why should bad be made worse? Bad is not made worse.
-It is for the peace of the evil themselves that they should be
-divested of all truth. The presence of truth with the wicked
-only adds to their torment by the continual protest it makes
-against their sin. It is also well that the evil lose all truth,
-for the sake of the good, whom they might trouble and
-disturb through the power that truth would afford them to
-assume an angelic appearance; to become wolves in sheep’s
-clothing; or as Paul states it, “Satan transforming himself
-into an angel of light.” Hypocrites, who have used truth
-to subserve their own selfish ends, remain longer than others
-in the world of spirits, and endure much suffering ere they
-allow their means of subtlety and mischief to depart from
-them. The process of divesting the evil of the truths they
-possess, is described by the Lord in these words: “Take
-heed, therefore, how ye hear: for whosoever hath, to him
-shall be given; and whosoever hath not, from him shall be
-taken even that which he seemeth to have.” Luke viii. 18.
-What is heard is truth. The good alone have truth, for
-their goodness loves truth, and cherishes it. Truth thus
-loved, multiplies; therefore it is said, “more shall be given.”
-The bad may have truth in their memory, may use it for
-selfish purposes, and talk much about it; nevertheless it is
-not theirs. Their internal evil hates it. “Every one that
-doeth evil hateth the light;” and in the future life the truth
-which he seemed to have, is taken from him. How just,
-and at the same time how merciful, is this judgment!</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_126"></a>[126]</span></p>
-
-<p>Hell is the congregation of all evil spirits. As there are
-many heavens, so likewise there are many hells. As the
-inhabitants of heaven are arranged from similarity of goodness
-and truth, so the inhabitants of hell are arranged from
-similarity of evil and falsity. The hells are arranged so
-distinctly according to the differences of evil, that nothing
-more orderly and distinct can be conceived. The Lord,
-speaking through David, says: Psalm lxxxvi. 13: “Thou
-hast delivered my soul from the <i>lowest hell</i>.” Thus from
-Scripture we derive a direct proof, if proof were wanted,
-of the gradations of evil. There are several other texts to
-the same effect.</p>
-
-<p>The scenery of hell, like that of heaven, is in perfect
-correspondence with the states of those there. It is an
-outbirth from the minds of its inhabitants; and as <i>they</i> are
-deformed and full of every pollution, so their scenery is full
-of horrors and things abominable. “In hell there is no sun,
-but the inhabitants roam in darkness corresponding to
-themselves, for they are darkness: their light is artificial, as
-of coal fires, meteors, ignes fatui, and the lights of night.
-They inhabit scenery of which they are the souls, as bogs,
-fens, tangled forests, caverns, dreary deserts, charred and
-ruined cities. In the milder hells, there appear, as it were,
-rude cottages, which are in some cases contiguous, and
-resemble the streets and lanes of a city. Within the houses
-infernal spirits are engaged in continual quarrels, enmities,
-blows, and violences, while the streets and lanes are full
-of robberies and depredations. The inhabitants are at
-continual war, hating and tormenting one another, and the
-cruelties they practice are indescribable.” “It is impossible
-to give a description of the horrible forms of the spirits
-of hell. No two are alike, although there is a general
-likeness in those who are in the same evil. They are forms
-of contempt of others, of menace against those who do not<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_127"></a>[127]</span>
-pay them respect, of hatreds of various kinds, and of revenge;
-and in these forms, outrage and cruelty are transparent
-from within; but when others commend, venerate, and
-worship them, their faces are drawn up, and have an
-appearance of gladness arising from delight. Some of their
-faces are direful and void of life, like corpses; some are
-black, and others fiery, like torches; others are disfigured
-by pimples, warts, and ulcers; and frequently no face appears,
-but instead of a face something hairy and bony, and sometimes
-nothing but teeth. Their bodies are monstrous, and
-their speech is the speech of anger, of hatred, of revenge;
-for every one speaks from his own false, and the tone of his
-voice is from his own evil. In a word they are all images
-of their own hell.”</p>
-
-<p>“And does Swedenborg relate such horrors?” some may
-ask. For facts, we answer, Swedenborg is not to blame.
-Like the Israelites of old, we would fain have our prophets
-“speak unto us smooth things.” Let us rid ourselves of all
-morbid delicacy, and seek to know the truth. We should
-all do well to peruse with patience those pages wherein our
-author narrates the horrors of hell, so that we may see, shun,
-and detest the evils which make hell. It is well that every
-man should know whither his lust, his pride, his avarice,
-or anger, is leading him. If he shudder, it is for his eternal
-good.</p>
-
-<p>The universal hell, like heaven, is as one man,—not of
-beauty, as heaven, but a hideous monster. In its collective
-capacity, it is the Devil and Satan; the Devil is the name
-of its evil, and Satan is the name of its falsity. There is
-no individual evil spirit ruling hell, and bearing either of
-those names. An enlightened view of Scripture confirms
-this doctrine in every point, and rids us of the innumerable
-absurdities which the commonly received theory in regard to
-the Devil involves. There is no spirit in hell who was not<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_128"></a>[128]</span>
-once a man on earth. There is no spirit in hell who was
-ever an angel in heaven. The Lord himself rules the hells,
-and by all means possible restrains their violence and mitigates
-their suffering.</p>
-
-<p>Some people believe that God turns away his face from
-man, rejects him, and casts him into hell, and that he is
-angry with him on account of his evils; and others go still
-further, and affirm that God punishes man, and brings evil
-upon him. They also confirm this opinion from the literal
-sense of the Word, in which expressions occur that appear
-to sustain it. But these opinions are formed through ignorance
-of the real sense of these passages, and from a blind
-neglect of others, the literal sense of which teaches that God
-is goodness and mercy itself, and that fury is not in him.
-Isaiah xxvii. 4. True doctrine declares that the Lord never
-turns away his face from man, never rejects him, never casts
-any one into hell, and is never angry. The Lord is continually
-withdrawing man from evil and leading him to good;
-but man’s freedom is never taken away. If man <i>will love</i>
-evil and <i>will do</i> perversely, the Lord does not prevent.
-That man should go to hell is at variance with the Divine
-design; but to infringe man’s freedom would be to destroy
-his life and take from him all that is human, reducing him
-to the level of a machine or a brute. Those who are in
-hell, cast themselves down thither, and keep themselves
-where they are. “This is,” as Wilkinson says, “he last
-dogma of free will,—that of a finite being perpetuating for
-ever his own evil, standing fast to selfishness without end,
-excluding Omnipotence in all its dispensations, and making
-the ‘will not’ into an everlasting ‘cannot,’ to maintain itself
-out of heaven, and contrary to heaven.”</p>
-
-<p>This is a very brief abstract of the leading ideas in Swedenborg’s
-wondrous treatise on Heaven and Hell. We are
-well aware how far short it falls of doing full justice to the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_129"></a>[129]</span>
-work. Let us hope that what has been said may induce
-some to make a personal acquaintance with it; and then they
-will understand the difficulties we labor under in condensing
-within a few pages its multitudinous facts and closely
-linked logic.</p>
-
-<p>It remains only to add, that the treatise on Heaven and
-Hell has been translated into English, French, and German.
-The English editions have been many, and in some cases
-large. The latest may be accepted as a sign of the times,
-being in the form of an eighteen-penny volume, a second
-edition of which has been called for. We lay no claim to the
-gift of prophecy, but we feel certain that the time is coming
-when Swedenborg’s “Heaven and Hell” will be the most
-popular and extensively read of religious books.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_130"></a>[130]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XIV">CHAPTER XIV.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>The White Horse—The Earths in the Universe—The New Jerusalem
-and its Heavenly Doctrine.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>1. The treatise on the White Horse mentioned in the
-Apocalypse, forms a tract of about twenty pages. It is an
-exposition of the spiritual sense of Revelation xix. 11-16.
-It is shown that by the heavens being opened, the White
-Horse, and its rider, are represented the Lord and his Word,
-and the quality of those to whom the internal truth of the
-Word is revealed. The particulars of the text are all gone
-into and expounded, and copious references made to the
-Arcana Cœlestia for fuller details. It is to be noted that
-voluminous as are Swedenborg’s theological works, that they
-form one harmonious whole bound together in the unity of
-truth, and mutually confirming each other. Literature, we
-believe, contains no example of so great a mass of writing
-permeated with such a consistent spirit, and so little affected
-by the author’s humors and fluctuations of mood.
-So far does this uniform spirit extend, that, had it been possible,
-we might imagine his many volumes had been struck
-out of thought in one short day, instead of being written
-continuously through a course of nearly thirty years.</p>
-
-<p>In this small treatise we have a list of the books in our
-Bible which form the true <i>Word of God</i>. They are, in the
-Old Testament, the five books of Moses; the book of Joshua;
-the book of Judges; the two books of Samuel; the two books
-of Kings; the Psalms of David; the Prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_131"></a>[131]</span>
-the Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel,
-Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah,
-Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi; and, in the New Testament,
-the four Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and
-John; and the Revelation. The rest have not the internal
-sense, and are not to be regarded as a part of the inspired
-Word. We shall have to speak of the plenary inspiration
-of the Word, when we come to Swedenborg’s treatise on the
-Sacred Scripture, and show how broad is the line of distinction
-between the Word of God and the writings of men.
-It requires but a slight acquaintance with the doctrine of
-correspondences, to perceive that this distinction between the
-books contained within the covers of the authorized version
-of the Bible is not arbitrary; that it is a distinction as
-marked and visible as that between God and man, or nature
-and art. Apart, however, from the doctrine of correspondences,
-the distinction may be sustained by the authority of
-the Jews, and the indirect testimony of many of the Fathers
-of the Christian Church, coupled with numerous natural
-reasons founded on a critical examination of style, etc.</p>
-
-<p>“The book of Job,” says Swedenborg, “was a book of the
-Ancient Church,” and therefore, with the exception of the
-first chapters of Genesis, is the oldest portion of the Bible. It
-has a kind of internal sense, but not like that of the Word.</p>
-
-<p>The exclusion of the Epistles from the Books of the
-Word, is perhaps, to a new reader, the most startling of
-Swedenborg’s announcements. For this exclusion and its
-reasons, we will simply quote his own words. Writing to
-Dr. Beyer, he says: “With regard to the writings of St.
-Paul, and the other Apostles, I have not given them a place
-in my ‘Arcana Cœlestia,’ because they are dogmatic writings
-merely, and are not written in the style of the Word, as are
-those of the Prophets, of David, of the Evangelists, and of
-the Revelation of St. John. The style of the Word consists<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_132"></a>[132]</span>
-throughout in correspondences, and thence effects immediate
-communication with heaven; but the style of these dogmatic
-writings is quite different, having, indeed, communication
-with heaven, but only mediately or indirectly. The reason
-why the Apostles wrote in this style, was, that the First
-Christian Church was then to begin through them; consequently,
-the same style as is used in the Word would not
-have been proper for such doctrinal tenets, which required
-plain and simple language, suited to the capacities of all
-readers. Nevertheless, the writings of the Apostles are very
-good books for the Church, inasmuch as they insist on the
-doctrine of charity, and faith from charity, as strongly as the
-Lord himself has done in the Gospels, and the Revelation of
-St. John, as will appear evidently to any one who studies these
-writings with attention.”</p>
-
-<p>2. The treatise on the “Earths in the Universe” is formed
-from several of those portions of the “Arcana Cœlestia,”
-occurring between the chapters, expository of the spiritual
-sense of Genesis and Exodus. It forms a pamphlet of about
-fifty pages.</p>
-
-<p>Many and prolonged have been the discussions as to
-whether other planets are, like our own, the abodes of human
-beings. Great as has been the progress of astronomical
-science, the learned are yet far from being unanimous on
-the question, as is evident from the recent controversy between
-Prof. Whewell and Sir David Brewster. Swedenborg
-does not entertain us with prolix reasonings as to whether or
-not the earths of the universe are inhabited. That was a
-question far too trivial for his masculine understanding.
-He saw that these vast spaces were not formed by the Lord,
-except for the highest end, the creation of a heaven of intelligent
-human beings, capable of satisfying the infinite desires
-of Divine Love. The earths of the universe are peopled
-even as our own globe, or are in course of preparation<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_133"></a>[133]</span>
-for it. Any other view than this is unworthy of acceptance,
-and dishonorable to the highest truths of reason and revelation.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg was permitted to see, and hold converse with,
-the inhabitants of other earths; and most interesting are
-his relations concerning them. Wilkinson aptly remarks
-that the work now under consideration “may be characterized
-as a Report on the Religion of the Universe.” Swedenborg
-tells us that the dwellers in these distant spheres
-think of the Lord and worship him. He describes the
-quality of their love and wisdom, and how they conduct
-themselves toward each other. It is a pleasant thought that
-the people of this world are the worst of humanity, the
-most sensual, and the least abounding in true intelligence
-and spirituality. In other words there is sin, and its consequent
-suffering, arising from the same cause as with us; but
-it is not so deep nor so wide spread. The fact of the Divine
-Incarnation is likewise known in other worlds, and is regarded
-as the great truth of faith.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg affirms that the moon is inhabited. We know
-that even those scientific men who hold to the doctrine of a
-plurality of worlds, do not believe in the habitability of the
-moon; because, say they, it lacks alike water and atmosphere.
-To say that it has no atmosphere is very unphilosophical.
-The atmosphere may not be of the same density
-as that of our earth; but that it should have no sphere or
-aura around it, we cannot for a moment believe. Swedenborg
-tells us that the Lunarians are dwarfs, like boys of
-seven years old, with robust bodies and pleasant countenances.
-They do not speak from their lungs, on account of the attenuated
-nature of their atmosphere, but from a quantity
-of air collected in the abdomen.</p>
-
-<p>It is but just to state that Swedenborg speaks of Saturn
-as the outermost planet of the solar system, he not being<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_134"></a>[134]</span>
-permitted to anticipate Herschel or Neptune. An opponent
-might make merry over this, and say: “Don’t you see that
-Swedenborg was but a dreamer? How could he know aught
-of the inhabitants of other earths when he did not even
-know that beyond Saturn rolled two immense worlds?” We
-reply, that it would have been disorderly for him to have
-become possessed of such knowledge by spiritual means. “But
-how so?” Because it would have compelled belief in the spiritual
-doctrines he taught, without due thought and examination,
-as soon as science had established the existence of these
-orbs; because miracles and prophecy are not permitted in these
-times, for they force and destroy man’s freedom. How easy it
-would be for the Lord to witness to the truth of His Word by
-supernatural signs in the natural world! Yet he does not,
-although belief in his Word, and life according to it, is essential
-to man’s highest happiness. Belief so induced would
-be worthless, because compelled. It may be said that this
-is mere special pleading; but it is not so. The laws laid
-down in a later work of Swedenborg’s, on the “Divine
-Providence,” fortify, in a most rational manner, the truth
-as we have endeavoured to set it forth. It is also to be remarked
-that natural truth must be discovered by its appropriate
-means,—natural investigation. It was necessary that
-Swedenborg should be skilled in all natural science previous
-to his illumination, so that he might possess a basis for
-many spiritual facts which could neither have been expressed
-nor made intelligible without at the same time giving
-their correspondence in nature. It would have been altogether
-contrary to the Divine order to have taken Swedenborg
-in his early youth and ignorance, and, making him a
-seer, have communicated natural truth to him in a supernatural
-manner.</p>
-
-<p>3. “The New Jerusalem and its Heavenly Doctrine” is a
-brief exposition of the leading truths of the New Church.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_135"></a>[135]</span>
-After each of its chapters follow references, (in some cases
-more extensive than the chapter itself,) to the “Arcana
-Cœlestia.” These references, so numerous in Swedenborg’s
-writings, do not form a dry and unreadable index, but may
-be looked on as a series of precepts pertaining to moral and
-spiritual life. Were we gathering a volume of gems of
-thought, we should find an abundance to suit our purposes
-in these references.</p>
-
-<p>This work has been printed as a cheap pamphlet. We
-know of no other work which could more appropriately be
-placed in the hands of a stranger desiring to know, without
-much reading, the nature of those doctrines which Swedenborg
-was commissioned to reveal to the world.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_136"></a>[136]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XV">CHAPTER XV.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Anecdotes.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>The trite observation that the lives of literary men are
-devoid of those incidents which make up a stirring and
-lively biography, applies with great truth to the career of
-Swedenborg. His quiet and unostentatious life afforded but
-few materials for anecdotes; hence we have but faint traces
-of his outward course. While writing the works we have
-just noticed, from 1747 to 1758, the principal portion of
-his time must have been passed in London. Few men in
-those days were capable of sympathy or communion with
-the elevated and spiritualized mind of Swedenborg. Yet
-though living as it were alone, he could not have been melancholy
-or desolate. Under the care and guidance of the
-Lord, favored with the company and converse of angels,
-and enjoying the consciousness of fulfilling high and holy
-duties, he had every reason to be the cheerful and contented
-man that contemporary testimony represents him. His
-evenings he used often to spend with his printer, Mr. Hart,
-of Poppin’s court, Fleet street. Mrs. Lewis, his publisher’s
-wife, knew him, and “thought him a good and sensible
-man, but too apt to spiritualize things.” Beyond a few
-particulars such as these, we know nothing of his private
-life.</p>
-
-<p>On the 19th of July, 1759, we find Swedenborg at Gottenburg.
-Here occurred the following circumstance, of which
-Immanuel Kant, the celebrated transcendentalist, is the
-narrator.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_137"></a>[137]</span></p>
-
-<p>“On Saturday, at 4 o’clock, P. M.,” says Kant, “when
-Swedenborg arrived at Gottenburg from England, Mr. William
-Castel invited him to his house, together with a party
-of fifteen persons. About 6 o’clock, Swedenborg went out,
-and after a short interval returned to the company, quite
-pale and alarmed. He stated that a dangerous fire had just
-broken out in Stockholm, at Sundermalm, (distant three
-hundred miles from Gottenburg,) and that it was spreading
-very fast. He was restless, and went out often. He said
-that the house of one of his friends, whom he named, was
-already in ashes, and that his own was in danger. At 8
-o’clock, after he had been out again, he joyfully exclaimed:
-‘Thank God! the fire is extinguished the third door from
-my house.’ This news occasioned great commotion among
-the company. It was announced to the governor the same
-evening. The next morning, Swedenborg was sent for by
-the governor, who questioned him concerning the disaster.
-Swedenborg described the fire precisely, how it had begun,
-in what manner it had ceased, and how long it had continued.
-On the same day the news was spread through the city; and
-as the governor had thought it worthy of attention, the
-consternation was considerably increased, as many were in
-trouble on account of their friends and property, which
-might have been involved in the disaster. On Monday
-evening, a messenger arrived at Gottenburg, who was
-despatched during the time of the fire. In the letters
-brought by him, the fire was described precisely in the
-manner stated by Swedenborg. On Tuesday morning, a
-royal courier arrived at the governor’s with the melancholy
-intelligence of the fire, of the loss it had occasioned, and
-of the houses damaged and ruined, not in the least differing
-from that which Swedenborg had given the moment it had
-ceased: the fire had been extinguished at 8 o’clock.</p>
-
-<p>“What,” continues Kant, “can be brought forward against<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_138"></a>[138]</span>
-the authenticity of this occurrence? My friend who wrote
-this to me, has not only examined the circumstances of this
-extraordinary case at Stockholm, but also, about two months
-ago, at Gottenburg, where he is acquainted with the most
-respectable houses, and where he could obtain the most
-authentic and complete information, as the greatest part
-of the inhabitants, who are still alive, were witnesses to the
-memorable occurrence.”</p>
-
-<p>This narrative is taken from a letter written by Kant, in
-1768, to Charlotte de Knobloch, a lady of quality. Kant,
-it may be remarked, was no adherent of Swedenborg’s.
-Two years before writing this letter, he had attacked him in
-a small work entitled, “Dreams of the Great Seer Illustrated
-by Dreams of Metaphysics.” Received from such a source,
-we can entertain no doubt as to the truth of the story.</p>
-
-<p>At home, in Stockholm, Swedenborg did not fail to excite
-much curiosity and attention, and his conduct and deportment
-were carefully watched. It was observed that he
-seldom went to church, or received the sacrament. This
-was owing partly to the contrariety of the Lutheran doctrine
-to his own views, and partly, Robsahm says, to the disease
-of the stone, which troubled him. In 1760, two bishops, his
-relations, remonstrated with him in a friendly manner upon
-his remissness. He answered, that, religious observances
-were not so necessary for him as for others, as he was
-associated with angels. They then represented that his
-example would be valuable, by which argument he suffered
-himself to be persuaded. A few days previously to receiving
-the sacrament, he asked his old domestics to whom he should
-resort for the purpose, for “he was not much acquainted
-with the different preachers.” The elder chaplain was mentioned.
-Swedenborg objected that “he was a passionate
-man and a fiery zealot, and that he had heard him thundering
-from the pulpit with little satisfaction.” The assistant<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_139"></a>[139]</span>
-chaplain was then proposed, who was not so popular with
-the congregation. Swedenborg said, “I prefer him to the
-other, for I hear that he speaks what he thinks, and by this
-means has lost the good-will of his people, as generally
-happens in this world.” Accordingly he took the sacrament
-from this curate.</p>
-
-<p>“In general,” says Robsahm, “Swedenborg would not
-enter into dispute on matters of religion. If he was necessitated
-to defend himself, he did it with mildness and in a few
-words; but if any one would not be convinced, and became
-warm in argument, he retired, saying, ‘Read my writings
-attentively and without prejudice; they will answer you in
-my stead, and will afford you reason to change your ideas
-and opinions on such things.’</p>
-
-<p>“He used, at first, freely to speak of his visions and
-spiritual explications of the Scriptures; but as this displeased
-the clergy, who proclaimed him a heretic and madman, he
-resolved to be less communicative of his knowledge in
-company, or, at least, more cautious, lest the censorious
-should have room to blame what they could not comprehend
-like himself. I once,” says Robsahm, “addressed the rector
-of the parish where he lived, an old and respected clergyman,
-asking him what he thought of Swedenborg’s visions and
-explanations of the Bible. The venerable man answered:
-‘God alone can judge of this; but I can not think him to be
-such a person as many do; I have myself conversed with
-him, and in company where we have been together, and I
-have found him to be a good and a holy man.’</p>
-
-<p>“It was remarkable that Swedenborg never endeavored
-to persuade any person to receive his opinions. He was in
-nowise led by that self-love which is observable in those who
-publish new opinions concerning church doctrines; neither
-did he seek to make many proselytes, not even communicating
-his thoughts and sentiments, except to those whom he<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_140"></a>[140]</span>
-thought virtuous, disposed to hear them with moderation,
-capable of comprehending them, and lovers of truth.</p>
-
-<p>“It is a very singular circumstance,” continues Robsahm,
-“that all who have read the writings of Swedenborg, with a
-desire to refute them, have finished the attempt by adhering
-to his sentiments.” This assertion must be received, however,
-with qualification.</p>
-
-<p>Though busied with the composition of his works, and immersed
-in spiritual contemplations, Swedenborg was not forgetful
-of the world and of his duties to his country. In
-1761 he took part in the Swedish Diet or Parliament.
-Three of his memorials or addresses to the Diet, are preserved.
-In the first of these he congratulates the House
-upon its meetings, and counsels the redress of all grievances
-which cause disaffection. In the second he advocates an
-alliance with France instead of England from prudential
-motives, at the same time strongly protesting against the evil
-of despotic governments, and the danger to liberty in the
-extension of the Roman Catholic faith. The third memorial
-is on the subject of finance. Count Hopken, the Swedish
-prime minister at that time, leaves on record that “the
-most solid memorials, and the best penned, at the Diet of
-1761, on matters of finance, were presented by Swedenborg;
-in one of which he refuted a large work in 4to on the same
-subject, quoted the corresponding passages of it, and all in
-less than one sheet.” He was likewise a member of the
-secret committee of the Diet, an office to which only the
-most sage and virtuous were elected. Consider, reader, for
-a moment, the dignity, the wisdom, and the abounding common
-sense which must have permeated the whole being of
-Swedenborg, to enable him to live down the obloquy attached
-to the name of a “ghost-seer,” and be received with
-high favor and acceptance by men of the world, sceptical
-and sensual!</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_141"></a>[141]</span></p>
-
-<p>Soon afterwards Swedenborg left Stockholm; and we find
-him in July, 1762, at Amsterdam. Jung Stilling received
-from a friend the following interesting anecdote respecting
-him at this time. “I was in Amsterdam,” says he, “in
-1762, in a company in which Swedenborg was present, on
-the very day that Peter III., Emperor of Russia, died. In
-the midst of our conversation his countenance changed, and
-it was evident that his soul was no longer there, and that
-something extraordinary was passing in him. As soon as
-he came to himself again, he was asked what had happened
-to him. He would not at first communicate it; but at
-length, after having been repeatedly pressed, he said: ‘This
-very hour, the Emperor Peter III. has died in his prison,’
-mentioning at the same time the manner of his death.
-‘Gentlemen will please to note down the day, that they may
-be able to compare it with the intelligence of his death in
-the newspapers.’ The newspapers subsequently announced
-the Emperor’s death as having taken place on that day.”</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_142"></a>[142]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XVI">CHAPTER XVI.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Doctrines of the Lord—The Sacred Scripture, Faith, and Life.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>In 1763, Swedenborg published, at Amsterdam, the following
-works:—1. The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem
-respecting the Lord; 2. The Sacred Scripture; 3. Faith; 4.
-Life; 5. Continuation respecting the Last Judgment and
-the Destruction of Babylon; and 6. Angelic Wisdom concerning
-the Divine Love and the Divine Wisdom. We will
-now speak of these works seriatim.</p>
-
-<p>1. The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem concerning the
-Lord, is a small treatise: but within its limits is concentrated
-so much light and rationality, that we might say the question
-it deals with was finally settled, did we not too well know
-the perversity and pertinacity of theological error, in closing
-the mind against the perception of truth, though it were
-manifested with angelic wisdom.</p>
-
-<p>The great truth in the treatise is the Supreme Divinity of
-the Lord Jesus Christ. This truth is brought forth from the
-collation of nearly every passage of Scripture which, in the
-literal sense, bears upon the subject. It is shown, by an invincible
-logic, that there is but one God; and that, in the
-Bible itself, the doctrine of three persons in the Godhead is
-not to be found. It is then shown that God the Lord, in
-the fullness of time, came to earth, and put on human nature,
-or became incarnate. The object sought to be effected by
-the incarnation, was the salvation of man. From the days
-of Adam, mankind had been treading a downward path.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_143"></a>[143]</span>
-Through wickedness, all true faith and spirituality had perished.
-Hell had drawn near to men, even to the possession
-of their bodies, as we read in the Gospels. Isaiah describes
-the state of mankind thus: “Hell hath enlarged herself,
-and opened her mouth without measure.” Humanity was
-thus hastening to destruction, and final extinction. But the
-Lord Jehovah interposed. Clothing himself with an arm
-of flesh, he met the powers of hell on their own ground;
-and rendering himself accessible to their attacks, in a series
-of the most direful temptation-combats, He reduced Hell to
-order, and redeemed mankind forever from the absolute dominion
-of devils. But this was not all. The human nature
-that the Lord had assumed, full of hereditary corruption,
-was taken from the race of Jewish kings, the most depraved
-and perverted to be found on earth. He purified, glorified,
-and made it divine, ascending with it to heaven. The new
-influences flowing through the medium of this Divine Humanity,
-are called the Holy Spirit. Of the truth of this we
-have the most convincing proof in John vii. 39, where it is
-said, “the Holy Ghost was <i>not yet, because</i> Jesus was not yet
-glorified.”</p>
-
-<p>From this it is very evident that the Trinity is not, as
-commonly taught, a Trinity of persons, but of principles.
-In ourselves we see a finite image of this Divine and Infinite
-Trinity. The soul of man may be taken as the representative
-of Jehovah; his body represents the Divine Humanity,
-or Jesus Christ; and his action or influence on others corresponds
-to the Holy Spirit. Regarded in this light, that
-most mystical and incomprehensible dogma of three Persons,
-and yet one God, is annihilated, and we come into the enjoyment
-of a faith at once scriptural, intelligible, and
-rational. It is impossible for us here to go into the details
-of this doctrine, or give even an outline of its proofs. To
-an earnest seeker after truth we can conceive no pleasure<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_144"></a>[144]</span>
-exceeding an acquaintance with this treatise on the Lord.
-If, especially, he has vexed and worn himself in reading the
-profitless controversies and lucubrations of learned divines
-on the Trinity, his fretted and heated mind will experience
-a spiritual relief similar to the natural one which results
-when patience has become exhausted in vain endeavors to
-unfasten a lock, and a skilled mechanic draws near, takes
-the work out of our hands, and with dexterity and ease accomplishes
-the task in a moment. Swedenborg lays his
-hand on the tangled mass of mysticism and perverted Scripture,
-and straightway the Gordian knot is untied. The
-simplicity of explanation fills us with amazement, and we
-wonder that it was never done before.</p>
-
-<p>2. The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem respecting the
-Sacred Scripture, next demands our attention. The primary
-truth of this treatise is, that the Sacred Scripture, or the
-Word, is Divine Truth itself, thus the Lord himself. Let
-us see how this can be.</p>
-
-<p>We are too apt to abstract books from their authors, and
-to regard them as matters impersonal,—as type and paper
-merely. Now this is a childish error, and a proof of the
-loose and external way in which we are accustomed to think.
-When I speak, or write, I manifest spiritual influences; and
-the force of these influences is proportionate to my earnestness,
-and their effect is proportionate to the state of reception
-of my hearers. Words are thus perceived to be the representatives
-of spiritual forces. The action of spirit on spirit
-is inappreciable by the senses; but could we look behind the
-veil of nature when a crowd or a congregation is swayed
-hither and thither by the speech of one man, we should see
-that the influence exerted was as real and actual as muscular
-force. From this we learn that words are not mere
-sounds, but are the sheaths or cases of spiritual life, and on
-this ground we at once see the force of the Lord’s declaration,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_145"></a>[145]</span>
-“The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and
-they are life.” John vi. 63.</p>
-
-<p>When we think of the Lord’s words, we must conjoin with
-the thought an idea of the Divine Nature and Attributes.
-The Lord’s speech being the manifestation of His life, must
-partake of its every quality, thus of infinity and of independence
-of time, and consequently of adaptation to every
-possible condition of mind, for infinity includes all. Bearing
-these facts in mind, we can easily perceive how true it is
-that the Word is the Lord Himself.</p>
-
-<p>But while the Word in its inmost is the Lord, and is thus
-infinite, yet as apprehended by man, who is finite, it necessarily
-wears a finite aspect. It is plain that as man’s ideas
-become sensualized and bound down to matter, his view of
-the Divine Truth, or Word, must involve many illusions;
-true, certainly, in relation to him, but very far removed from
-the absolute Divine Truth. Now the literal sense of the
-Word, as we read it in our Bibles, is the presentation, if we
-may so phrase it, of the aspect of the Lord to the natural
-man, whose senses constitute his court of appeal. The Jews,
-to whom the Word in its literal sense was delivered, were
-just such men.</p>
-
-<p>Above this natural state of mind, there are two marked
-grades of intelligence—the spiritual and celestial. To these,
-the Lord’s words bear a far wider meaning, and are more
-fully instinct with the glory of the Divine Wisdom, and the
-warmth of the Divine Love.</p>
-
-<p>It is thus said that the Word of God has three senses—the
-natural, the spiritual, and the celestial. We attribute
-these senses to the Word: more correctly we should charge
-them to the universal human mind, whose capacity of reception
-they express. To no two men, or angels, does the
-Lord,—or in fact anything,—bear precisely the same appearance,
-or suggest the same meaning.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_146"></a>[146]</span></p>
-
-<p>These three grades, separated by discrete degrees, make
-up the universe of humanity; and the enlightened eye of the
-true philosopher may trace in every object of external creation
-an image and representation of them. But space forbids
-further explanation on this head; our author’s reasoning
-is, moreover, so closely linked as to admit of no curtailment.
-Suffice to say, that after demonstrating the existence of an
-internal sense in the Scripture, he proceeds to show the many
-uses of the literal sense, and, at the same time, the manifold
-abuses to which it is liable, when the laws by which it is
-written are not understood.</p>
-
-<p>Accepting the sublime philosophy of this treatise, we find
-in it a perfect refuge from the attacks of the sceptic, and
-discover a thousand reasons for one we had before, for loving
-God’s Holy Book, trusting in its wisdom, and committing
-our lives to its guidance.</p>
-
-<p>3. The Doctrine of Faith of the New Jerusalem, may be
-best understood by a few extracts from the treatise itself.
-Swedenborg writes: “The idea attached to the term faith at
-the present day is this, that it consists in thinking a thing to
-be so, because it is taught by the church, and because it does
-not fall within the scope of the understanding. For it is
-usual with those who inculcate it, to say, ‘You must believe,
-and not doubt.’ If you answer: ‘I do not comprehend it,’
-it is replied: ‘That is the very circumstance which makes a
-doctrine an object of faith.’ Thus the faith of the present
-day is a faith in what is not known, and may be called a
-blind faith: and as being the dictate of one person abiding
-in the mind of another, it is a historical faith. But this is
-not spiritual faith.</p>
-
-<p>“Genuine faith is an acknowledgment that a thing is so,
-because it is true. For he who is in genuine faith thinks
-and speaks to this effect:—‘This is true; and therefore I
-believe it.’ For faith is the assurance with which we embrace<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_147"></a>[147]</span>
-that which is true; and that which is true is the proper
-object of faith. A person of this character, also, if he does
-not comprehend a sentiment, and see its truth, will say: ‘I
-do not know whether this is true or not; therefore I do not
-yet believe it. How can I believe what I do not comprehend?
-Perhaps it may be false.’</p>
-
-<p>“But the common language is, that nobody can comprehend
-things of a spiritual or theological nature, because they
-transcend our natural faculties. Spiritual truths, however,
-are as capable of being comprehended as natural truths.
-The reason that spiritual things admit of being comprehended,
-is, because man, as to his understanding, is capable of being
-elevated into the light of heaven, in which light no other
-objects appear than such as are spiritual.</p>
-
-<p>“Hence now it is that those who are in the spiritual
-affection of truth, enjoy an internal acknowledgment of it.
-As the angels are in that affection, they utterly reject the
-tenet that the understanding ought to be kept in subjection
-to faith: for they say, ‘How can you believe a thing, when
-you do not see whether it is true or not?’ And should any
-one affirm that what he advances must nevertheless be
-believed, they reply: ‘Do you think yourself a God, that I
-am to believe you? or that I am mad, that I should believe
-an assertion in which I do not see any truth? If I must
-believe it, cause me to see it.’ The dogmatizer is thus
-constrained to retire. Indeed, the wisdom of the angels
-consists solely in this, that they see and comprehend what
-they think.</p>
-
-<p>“There is a spiritual idea of which few have any knowledge,
-which enters by influx into the minds of those who are in
-the affection of truth, and dictates interiorly whether the
-thing which they are hearing or reading is true or not. In
-this idea are those who read the Word in illumination from
-the Lord. To be in illumination is to be in perception.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_148"></a>[148]</span>
-Those who are in this illumination are said to be taught
-of Jehovah, and of them it is said in Jeremiah: ‘Behold,
-the days come that I will make a new covenant:—this shall
-be the covenant,—I will put my law in their inward parts,
-and write it in their hearts; and they shall teach no more
-every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying,
-Know ye the Lord; for they shall all know me.’ xxxi. 31,
-33, 34.</p>
-
-<p>“From these considerations it is plain that faith and truth
-are one. This also is the reason that the ancients, who were
-more accustomed to think of truth from affection than the
-moderns, instead of faith used the word truth: and for the
-same reason, in the Hebrew language, truth and faith are
-expressed by one and the same word, amuna, or amen.</p>
-
-<p>“If any one thinks with himself, or says to another, ‘Who
-can have that internal acknowledgment of truth which is
-faith? I can not.’ I will tell him how he may. Shun
-evils as sins, and apply to the Lord; then you will have as
-much as you desire.”</p>
-
-<p>Such then is the New Church doctrine of faith. Faith is
-the perception and acknowledgment of truth from a right
-understanding of it. True faith is something that grows.
-It is not the gift of a moment. It is attained by leading a
-good life, and through obedience to the truth so far as we
-know it. In the course of time we find that a pure life is
-clearing our spiritual vision, and extending its range. Spiritual
-truths which we had laid up in our memories, and
-perhaps fancied that we had believed, are brought forth, are
-seen in new and striking light, are elevated into the understanding,
-and are in reality believed. Thus a living faith is
-attained. This doctrine finds a Divine seal in these words
-of the Lord: “If any man will do his will, he shall know
-of the doctrine, whether it be of God.” John vii. 17.</p>
-
-<p>The remainder of this little treatise is taken up with an<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_149"></a>[149]</span>
-exposure of the fallacies involved in the common doctrines
-of faith prevailing in the Protestant and Roman Catholic
-churches. Faith separated from charity, is proved to have
-no existence, because evil can by no possibility love truth.
-Spiritual and Divine Truth may, it is true, be reasoned
-upon, defended, and expounded, by wicked men, for the
-promotion of their own selfish ends; but internally they are
-in deep hatred and denial of them, and in the other life their
-detestation of them causes them to cast them forth even
-from the memory. Thus the wicked have no faith and no
-truth.</p>
-
-<p>4. The treatise on the Doctrine of Life is a brief and
-compendious exposition of the nature of that life which leads
-to heaven and happiness. In the first place, it asserts that
-all religion has relation to life, and that the life of religion is
-to do good; agreeable to the Lord’s saying: “He that hath
-my commandments and keepeth them, he it is that loveth
-me.” John xiii. 17. It is then shown that no one can do
-good, which is really good, from himself, as is taught in
-John, where we read: “A man can receive nothing, except
-it be given him from heaven,” iii. 27; and again: “He that
-abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much
-fruit; for without me ye can do nothing;”—“He that abideth
-in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit,”
-signifies that all good is from the Lord; fruit signifies good:
-“without me ye can do nothing,” signifies that no one can
-do good from himself.</p>
-
-<p>Now, it may be asked, “Why can a man not do good of
-himself?” For this simple reason, that, as there is no goodness
-out of the Lord, if man does good, his power and disposition
-to do it must, in all certainty, be derived from the
-Lord alone. Man, in his highest state, is but a medium for
-the manifestation of the Divine Life or Goodness. Yet
-while only a medium, he must act in freedom, as of himself.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_150"></a>[150]</span>
-The appearance is that the good he does is self-originated, and
-born of his own will; and this appearance can never be removed,
-because on it depends his freedom of action. Man
-must subdue all tendencies to spiritual pride arising therefrom,
-by habitual reference to the truth that the Lord is all
-in all; and that if he has done good, or been useful, he has
-been indebted for the motive as well as for the wisdom, to
-the Divine Mercy alone; as Paul said to the Philippians:
-“For it is God which worketh in you <i>both to will and to do</i>
-of his good pleasure.” ii. 15. While thus saved by the Divine
-Mercy, through a good life, and brought into spiritual
-health by obedience to divine laws, man has no reason whatever
-to boast, or to take credit to himself for his bliss and
-salvation. The advocates of justification and salvation by
-faith alone, charge spiritual pride and merit, as a necessity,
-upon all who believe that heaven and its happiness are
-attained through the regenerative influence of a good life;
-but this accusation falls to the ground when it is acknowledged
-that the power to lead a good life is the continual
-gift and inspiration of God. If man would only think
-truly, he would see that humility is the acknowledgment of
-the grand primal truth of existence, that nothing we have
-or can do that is good, is of ourselves, but solely of the
-Lord; and that just as we are left to ourselves and our own
-wisdom, we do evil, and perpetrate folly and mischief. Salvation
-through a good life, when thus rightly stated and
-understood, is seen to involve nothing of merit, but only the
-strongest reasons for gratitude, humility, and worship.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_151"></a>[151]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XVII">CHAPTER XVII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>The Divine Love and Divine Wisdom—The Continuation of the Last
-Judgment.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>The treatise on the Divine Love and Wisdom, is a book
-which, when mastered, affords a key to the whole philosophy
-of the New Church, and to a rational understanding of all
-the writings of Swedenborg. When we say this, it will be
-easily understood that it is not a book to be read in a few
-hours, or hastily glanced over. Every page is pregnant with
-thought, and many of its paragraphs might be expanded
-into volumes. It is a book which, full of thought on the
-deepest subjects, demands an exercise of like thought on the
-part of its reader; and if he has patience, and a simple love
-of truth for its own sake, happy will he be when he has
-made himself familiar with the divine thoughts which, like
-stars, gem every page of this matchless treatise.</p>
-
-<p>The book is divided into five Parts. The First Part sets
-forth, in the simplest language, the doctrine of the Divine
-Nature. The Lord’s essence is shown to be Infinite Love,
-and its manifestation to be Infinite Wisdom. It is proved
-that the Divine Love is the only life in the universe, and
-that in God “all things live, move, and have their being.”
-The Lord is also proved to be very and essential Man, yet
-above and independent of all space and time, filling all
-spaces of the universe without space, and all time without
-time; and being in the greatest and the least things evermore
-the same. These statements may appear inconsequential,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_152"></a>[152]</span>
-but in our limited space, we can not explain more fully.
-We could not give the proofs satisfactorily, without quoting
-the volume itself. Argument is so linked to argument, that
-they hardly admit of separation.</p>
-
-<p>The Second Part of the work treats of the sun of heaven,
-and the sun of our world. It is shown that from the Lord
-flows a Divine Sphere, which appears in the spiritual world
-as a sun. From its heat, angels and man have their love,
-and from its light their wisdom, thus their life. This sun is
-not God, but it is the first proceeding from the Divine Love
-and the Divine Wisdom of God-Man. By means of this
-sun the Lord created the universe and all things in it. The
-sun of the natural world is pure fire, and therefore dead; and
-since nature derives its origin from that sun, it also is dead.
-Without two suns, the one living and the other dead, there
-could be no creation. The end of creation is, that all things
-may return to the Creator, and conjunction may exist in its
-ultimates.</p>
-
-<p>Part Third declares that in the spiritual world there are
-atmospheres, waters and earths, as in the natural world; but
-that the former are spiritual, whereas the latter are natural.
-We are then introduced to the doctrine of degrees—a doctrine
-which must be studied and understood, before any one
-can with justice speak of Swedenborg; for it is a doctrine
-which lies at the basis of that peerless spiritual philosophy
-of which he was the promulgator. All that we can do here
-in the way of exposition, is to quote the heads of his articles
-which express the truth far more lucidly than we could do.</p>
-
-<p>“There are three degrees of Love and wisdom, and thence
-degrees of heat and light, and degrees of atmosphere. Degrees
-are of two kinds, degrees of altitude and degrees of
-latitude. The degrees of altitude are homogeneous, and
-one derived from the other in a series, like end, cause, and
-effect. The first degree is in all the subsequent degrees.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_153"></a>[153]</span>
-All perfections increase and ascend with degrees, and according
-to degrees. In successive order the first degree constitutes
-the highest, and the third the lowest; but in simultaneous
-order, the first degree constitutes the inmost, and the third
-the outmost. The ultimate degree is the complex, continent,
-and basis, of the prior degrees. The degrees of altitude in
-their ultimate, are in their fullness and power. There are
-degrees of both kinds in the greatest and least of all created
-things. There are three infinite and uncreated degrees of
-altitude in the Lord, and three finite and created degrees in
-man. These three degrees of altitude are in every man
-from his birth, and may be opened successively, and as they
-are opened, a man is in the Lord, and the Lord in him.
-Spiritual light flows into man by three degrees, but not
-spiritual heat, except so far as he avoids evils as sins, and
-looks to the Lord. If the superior or spiritual degree is not
-opened in a man, he becomes natural and sensual. The
-natural degree of the human mind, considered in itself, is
-continuous, but by correspondence with the two superior degrees,
-while it is elevated, it appears as if it were discrete.</p>
-
-<p>“The natural mind, being the tegument and continent of
-the higher degrees of the human mind, is a re-agent; and if
-the superior degrees are not opened, it acts against them, but
-if they are opened, it acts with them. The abuse of the faculties
-which are proper to man, called rationality and liberty,
-is the origin of evil. A bad man may enjoy these two
-faculties as well as a good man; but a bad man abuses
-them to confirm evils and falses, while a good man uses
-them to confirm goods and truths. Evils and falses, when
-confirmed, remain; and become parts of a man’s love and
-life. The things which become parts of a man’s love and
-thence of his life, are communicated hereditarily to his
-offspring.</p>
-
-<p>“All these evils and consequent falses, both hereditary and<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_154"></a>[154]</span>
-acquired, reside in the natural mind. Evils and falses are
-entirely opposed to goods and truths; because evils and
-falses are diabolical and infernal, and goods and truths are
-divine and heavenly. The natural mind, which is in evils
-and falses, is a form and image of hell, and descends by
-three degrees. These three degrees of the natural mind,
-which is an image and form of hell, are opposed to the three
-degrees of the spiritual mind, which is a form and image of
-heaven: thus the natural mind which is a hell, is in complete
-opposition to the spiritual mind which is a heaven.
-All things of the three degrees of the natural mind, are
-included in works, which are performed by acts of the
-body.”</p>
-
-<p>Part Fourth teaches that the Lord from eternity, who is
-Jehovah, created the universe and all things therein from
-Himself, and not from nothing; this would not have been
-possible if the Lord were not a Divine Man; He from himself
-producing the sun of the spiritual world, and by it creating
-all things. In the substances and matters of which
-earths consist, there is nothing of the Divine in itself; but
-still they are from the Divine in itself. All created things
-in the created universe, viewed from uses, represent man in
-an image; this testifies that God is Man. All things created
-by the Lord are uses; and they are uses in the order,
-degree, and respect, in which they have relation to man,
-and by man to the Lord their Creator. Evil uses were not
-created by the Lord, but originated together with hell, after
-man’s fall. The visible things in the created universe testify
-that nature has produced nothing, and does produce nothing;
-but that the Divine has produced and does produce
-all things from Himself, and through the spiritual world.</p>
-
-<p>Part Fifth is devoted to a description of man’s spiritual
-nature. It is shown that “the Lord has formed and created
-in man two receptacles and habitations for Himself, called<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_155"></a>[155]</span>
-the will and the understanding; the will for His Divine
-Love, and the understanding for His Divine Wisdom. The
-will and understanding are in the brains, in the whole and
-every part thereof, and thence in the body, in the whole and
-every part thereof. There is a correspondence of the will
-with the heart, and of the understanding with the lungs;
-and all things that can be known of the will and understanding,
-or of love and wisdom, consequently all that can
-be known of man’s soul, may be known from the correspondence
-of the heart with the will, and of the understanding
-with the lungs.”</p>
-
-<p>There are many volumes in the world whose thinly spun
-thought, spread over page after page, it would be easy to
-condense into one brief paragraph; but the treatise on the
-Divine Love and Wisdom is not such a work. It is one of
-those rare books which suggest and expand thought, but can
-bear no abridgment or compression. We have well studied
-it, but do not expect to finish it during our life on earth.
-Time was, when, immersed in man made systems of faith,
-and wont to walk abroad in the green fields and woods, by
-the sea-side, and on the mountains—we found it difficult, nay
-we should rather say impossible, to see the God we read of
-in our books, and thought of in our chamber, to be the same
-kind Father to whom those wide and beauteous scenes owed
-their existence. Justification by faith—Jerusalem—the Jews—ephod
-and teraphim—the Temple, and the sacrifice—seemed
-to have no connection with the landscape, the wind,
-the falling rain, the flowing river, and the broad and limitless
-ocean. We knew it should not be so. If the Bible
-were God’s book, it must have some closer affinity with his
-great work of nature. We knew that one Lord was over
-all, and that this disunity should by no means exist. Much
-mental pain and travail were our portion. The easy soothsayings
-of Atheism beguiled us. We “wandered in the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_156"></a>[156]</span>
-wilderness in a solitary way, and found no city (doctrine)
-to dwell in.” We longed for the rest of Zion. We sighed
-not in vain. The divine philosophy of this precious book
-was revealed to us, and we knew the blessing of a faith
-which finds a confirmation in every item and phase of creation,
-and makes the Bible and nature evermore at one, each
-confirming and illustrating the other. It gave to life new
-aims and aspects. It brought a mental peace we had
-never hoped to enjoy, and we went on our journey of life
-rejoicing.</p>
-
-<p>“The Continuation of the Last Judgment,” is a small
-pamphlet forming a supplement to the treatise on the Last
-Judgment, with which it is now generally published. It
-contains a very interesting account of the Last Judgment
-upon the Reformed. By the Reformed, upon whom the
-Last Judgment was effected, Swedenborg means those who
-professed a belief in God, read the Word, heard sermons,
-partook of the sacrament of the Supper, yet lived in all
-manner of evils. Living like Christians in externals, and
-outwardly in unity with heaven, while inwardly united with
-hell, they were permitted after death to form societies, and
-to live as in the world; and by arts unknown in the world,
-to cause splendid appearances, and by this means to persuade
-themselves and others that they were in heaven. From this
-outward appearance, therefore, they called their societies
-heavens. The heavens and the lands in which they dwelt,
-are understood by the “former heaven, and the former earth,
-which passed away.” Rev. xxi. 7.</p>
-
-<p>At the time of the Last Judgment, the hypocrisy of these
-spirits was revealed in the light of heaven, and the simple
-good with whom they had associated, separated themselves
-with horror from them. No longer able to simulate Christian
-lives, they rushed with delight into evils and crimes
-of every description, openly appeared as devils, and found<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_157"></a>[157]</span>
-for themselves the hells corresponding to their loves. At
-the same time all the splendid appearances they had made
-for themselves vanished away; their palaces were turned
-into vile huts; their gardens into stagnant pools; their
-temples into piles of rubbish; and the hills on which they
-dwelt, into heaps of gravel, in correspondence with their
-depraved dispositions and lusts.</p>
-
-<p>“After the Judgment was effected,” writes Swedenborg,
-“there was joy in heaven, and also light in the world of
-spirits, such as was not before. A similar light also then
-arose on men in the world, giving them new enlightenment.
-I then saw angelic spirits, in great numbers, rising from
-below, and elevated into heaven. They were the sheep there
-reserved, and guarded by the Lord for ages back, lest they
-should come into the malignant sphere of the dragonists,
-and their charity be suffocated. These are they who are
-understood in the Word by those who went forth from the
-sepulchers; also by the souls of those slain for the testimony
-of Jesus, who were watching; and by those who are of the
-first resurrection.”</p>
-
-<p>After this follows a description of many things seen in the
-spiritual world. He writes: “There are lands in the spiritual
-world, just as in the natural world: there are hills and
-mountains, plains and valleys, also fountains and rivers,
-lakes and seas; there are paradises, and gardens and groves,
-and woods, and palaces, and houses; there are writings, and
-books, functions, [<i>functiones</i>,] and employments; there are
-precious stones, gold and silver; in short, there are all the
-things, in general and in particular, which exist in the
-natural world; but in the heavens all these things are
-infinitely more perfect.”</p>
-
-<p>He then describes “the noble English nation” in the
-spiritual world; the more excellent of whom are in the
-centre of all Christians, because they have interior intellectual<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_158"></a>[158]</span>
-light. This light they derive from the liberty they enjoy
-of thinking, and thence of speaking and writing. The Dutch
-are then described, and then the Papists, and the Popish
-saints. The Mohammedans, the Africans, and the Gentiles
-follow; and finally the Jews, the Quakers, and the Moravians.
-The description of all these people, as they appear
-beyond the grave, has an interest of a most absorbing kind;
-and the light thrown by Swedenborg on their internal
-character, serves to show cause for much that happens in
-the external world, otherwise difficult of explanation.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_159"></a>[159]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XVIII">CHAPTER XVIII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Angelic Wisdom Concerning the Divine Providence.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>Still living in Amsterdam, Swedenborg published, in
-1764, his work entitled “Angelic Wisdom Concerning the
-Divine Providence.” Its purpose is to</p>
-
-<div class="poetry-container">
-<div class="poetry">
- <div class="stanza">
- <div class="verse indent12">“assert eternal Providence,</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">And justify the ways of God to man.”</div>
- </div>
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<p>In the first place, it is shown that the Divine Providence
-is the government of the Love and the Wisdom of the Lord.
-This Providence has for its sole end the formation of a
-heaven from the human race, and thus has respect only to
-what is infinite and eternal. In the Divine sight, things
-temporal and natural are of no importance except so far as
-they contribute to man’s salvation.</p>
-
-<p>Although the Lord thus wills and works for man’s eternal
-happiness, yet, after all, heaven can only be attained through
-man’s coöperation. The Lord ever performs his share of the
-work, but man too often fails to do his. Weeping over
-Jerusalem, the Lord exclaimed: “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem,
-thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them that are
-sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children
-together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her
-wings, <i>and ye would not</i>!” Matthew xxiii. 37. How powerfully
-and tenderly is here expressed the Divine willingness
-to save, and how pointedly and decisively is man’s misery
-attributed to his own obstinacy. As the Lord Jesus is<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_160"></a>[160]</span>
-another place says: “Ye <i>will not</i> come to me that ye might
-have life.” John v. 40.</p>
-
-<p>In all the operations of the Divine Providence, human
-freedom is respected. The Lord forces no man to do what
-is good, or believe what is true. He drives none to heaven.
-It is of the Divine Providence that whatsoever a man hears,
-sees, thinks, speaks, and does, should appear altogether as
-his own. Without this appearance, men would have no
-reception of Divine Truth, no determination to do good, no
-appropriation of love and wisdom or of charity and faith,
-and thence no conjunction with the Lord; consequently no
-reformation and regeneration, and thereby salvation. Without
-this appearance, it is evident there could be no repentance
-and no faith; and man would not be man, but void
-of rational life like a beast. It is plain, then, that in order
-that man may be saved, he must be induced to live a good
-life by means which in nowise trench upon this appearance
-of free and independent life. Regeneration is effected by
-man’s removing evils from his external life, <i>as of himself</i>;
-yet, knowing that all good and truth is from the Lord, he
-acknowledges, as a consequence, that all power to remove
-these evils is derived from the Lord alone.</p>
-
-<p>Intensely as the Lord desires that man should shun evils
-and lead a holy life in obedience to his commandments, yet
-He only seeks to win man to peace and heaven by means
-which do not infringe upon his freedom. It is a law of
-His Divine Providence, that man should not be forced by
-external means to think and will, and so to believe and love
-the things which are of religion. It has been asked by
-atheists, “If there be a God, why does he not write so on the
-sun, and so save men from unbelief?” Swedenborg answers
-this question most satisfactorily, by showing that miracles,
-signs, visions, conversations with the dead, threats, and
-punishments, are totally ineffective to produce that state of<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_161"></a>[161]</span>
-love and spiritual life which make true happiness and heaven;
-because these force, and destroy the rationality and
-liberty which constitute the inmost life of humanity, and by
-the exercise of which, man can alone be delivered from
-evil.</p>
-
-<p>Let us read Swedenborg’s testimony on miracles. He
-writes: “That such is the nature of miracles, may plainly
-appear from those wrought before the Jewish and Israelitish
-people. Although they saw so many miracles in Egypt, afterwards
-at the Red Sea, others in the Desert, and especially
-upon Mount Sinai, when the law was promulgated, yet, in
-the space of a month, when Moses tarried upon that mountain,
-they made themselves a golden calf, and acknowledged
-it for Jehovah who brought them out of the land of Egypt.
-The same also may appear from the miracles wrought afterwards
-in the land of Canaan, notwithstanding which the
-people so often departed from the worship that was commanded;
-and from the miracles which the Lord wrought
-before them when he was in the world, notwithstanding
-which they crucified him. The reason why miracles were
-wrought among the Jews and Israelites was, because they
-were altogether external men, and were introduced into the
-land of Canaan merely that they might represent a church
-and its internal principles by the external things of worship;
-and a wicked man may be representative, as well as a good
-man. The external things of worship among them were
-rituals, all which signified spiritual and celestial things.
-Even Aaron, although he made the golden calf, and conducted
-the worship of it, could, nevertheless, represent the
-Lord and his work of salvation. And as they could not,
-by the internal principles of worship, be led to represent
-these things, therefore they were led, yea forced and compelled,
-to do it by miracles. The reason why they could not
-be brought to such representation by the internal principles<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_162"></a>[162]</span>
-of worship was, because they did not acknowledge the Lord,
-although the whole Word, which was among them, treats of
-Him only; and he who does not acknowledge the Lord, can
-not receive any internal worship. But after the Lord manifested
-himself, and was received and acknowledged in the
-churches as the eternal God, miracles ceased.</p>
-
-<p>“The effect of miracles upon the good, however, is different
-from what it is upon the wicked. The good do not desire
-miracles, but they believe the miracles which are recorded
-in the Word; and if they hear anything of a miracle, they
-attend no otherwise to it than as a light argument which
-confirms their faith; for they think from the Word, consequently
-from the Lord, and not from a miracle. It is otherwise
-with the wicked: they indeed may be driven and forced
-into faith, and even into worship and piety, but only for a
-short time; for their evils being shut in, the inclinations
-thereto, and the delights thence derived, continually act
-against the external of their worship and piety; and in order
-that these evils may escape from confinement and break
-out, they think about the miracle, and at length call it a delusion,
-or an artifice, or an operation of nature, and so return
-into their evils; and he who returns into his evils after worship,
-profanes the truths and goods of worship, and the lot of
-profaners after death is the worst of all. Besides, if miracles
-were to be wrought before those who do not believe in consequence
-of the miracles recorded in the Word, they must
-be continually performed, and constantly presented to their
-view. From these considerations, the reason may appear
-why miracles are not performed at this day.”</p>
-
-<p>It is thus seen that the Lord will not force a man to
-lead a good life; because, in forcing him, his humanity would
-be destroyed, and all that makes life worthy and manly
-would be lost, seeing that the exercise of rationality and
-liberty would be annihilated.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_163"></a>[163]</span></p>
-
-<p>It is a law of the Divine Providence, that a man should
-be led and taught from the Lord out of heaven by the Word,
-and by doctrine and preaching from the Word, and this in
-all appearance as from himself. The Lord, as we have before
-seen, is the Word; and when man reads the Word, he
-brings his thought into contact with the Divine Wisdom,
-and when he obeys its teachings he is in very truth led by
-the Lord. Yet we all see that this teaching and leading of
-the Lord is effected without any violation of man’s freedom,
-for he is led and taught in externals to all appearance as
-of himself.</p>
-
-<p>It is a law of the Divine Providence that a man should
-not perceive and feel anything of the operation of the Divine
-Providence, but yet should know and acknowledge it.
-If a man perceived and felt the operation of the Divine
-Providence, he would not act from liberty according to reason,
-nor would anything appear to him as his own. It
-would also be the same if he foreknew events. “The reason
-why it is not granted man to foreknow events, is, that he
-may be able to act from liberty according to reason; also,
-that there is nothing that a man revolves in his reason which
-is not from a desire that it may come into effect by thought.
-If, therefore, he knew the effect or event from divine prediction,
-reason would become quiescent, and with reason love;
-for love, with reason, terminates in the effect, and from that
-begins anew. It is the very delight of reason, that from
-love in the thought it may see the effect,—not in the effect,
-but before it, or not in the present, but in the future. Hence
-a man has what is called Hope, which in reason increases
-and decreases, as it sees or expects the event. This delight
-is fulfilled in the event, but afterwards is obliterated with the
-thought concerning the event; and it would be the same
-with an event foreknown.” The whole zest of life would be
-dissipated could man foreknow the future.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_164"></a>[164]</span></p>
-
-<p>While the operation of the Divine Providence is thus
-veiled from man’s eyes, and it appears to him that he is alone
-in the world, and that on his small prudence hangs all
-things,—if he would be wise he must not be led by appearances,
-but rising above them, acknowledge the truth “that
-self-derived prudence is nothing, and <i>only appears as if it
-were something</i>, [and ought so to appear;] but that the Divine
-Providence in things most singular is universal.” And
-because our life and intelligence are momentarily derived
-from the Lord, it follows as a necessary consequence, that
-all which we do that is orderly and effective, is done by
-the Lord, through our yielding ourselves to Him as His
-instruments.</p>
-
-<p>It is often urged as a reason against believing in an overruling
-and universal Divine Providence, that the world is
-full of evil and wickedness; and if there be an omnipotent
-God, he would surely never suffer such things to exist.
-Swedenborg enters very fully into this question. The reasons
-why Adam was permitted to fall, and Cain to slay
-Abel; Solomon to establish idolatrous worship, and many
-kings after him to profane the holy things of the church,
-the Jews to crucify the Lord; why impiety is allowed to exist,
-and the impious and profligate to be promoted to riches
-and honors, while the worshipers of God and the doers of
-righteousness remain in contempt and poverty; why wars
-are permitted, men slaughtered, the property of the innocent
-destroyed, and victories go with force and not with justice;
-why the earth is permitted to remain covered with idolatries,
-and the Christian religion to occupy so small a place, and
-even there to be deeply corrupted and devastated with heresies,—are
-stated at length and most satisfactorily. It is
-made plain, that, were the Lord to interfere and prevent
-such evils by force, it would defeat the end for which He
-created man, namely, salvation and eternal life in heaven.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_165"></a>[165]</span>
-Now as man can only be regenerated and enter heaven
-through the free exercise of his understanding and free
-choice of his will, any external interference of the Divine
-Providence with outward circumstances would suspend the
-action of man’s faculties; would, in short, dehumanise the
-race, and leave only animals to be dealt with. It is not of
-the Lord’s will, indeed, that evil should exist; and His
-Providence is unceasingly exerted to modify and mitigate it,
-alike in its origin and in its effect; but, since to prevent its
-manifestation would be to take from man all that makes him
-man, its permission is a necessity.</p>
-
-<p>It was said that the Providence of the Lord is unceasingly
-exerted to modify and mitigate evil, alike in its origin
-and in its effects. Swedenborg very beautifully and amply
-illustrates this truth, and shows that the Divine Providence
-is equally with the wicked and the good. The wicked man,
-of his own free choice, continually plunges himself more
-and more deeply into evil; because as he wills and does evil,
-he introduces himself more and more deeply into infernal
-societies. But the Lord, by a thousand invisible means,
-continually withdraws him from evil; and where a cure or
-complete prevention is impossible, mitigates his fearful fate
-by providing circumstances and situations in life which serve
-to lead the evil into less hurtful developments. The operation
-of the Divine Providence in saving man begins at his
-birth, and continues to the end of his life. The Lord sees
-what a man is, and what he desires to be, consequently what
-he will be; therefore the Lord foresees his state after death,
-and provides for it from his birth to the end of his life; with
-the wicked He provides by permitting and continually withdrawing
-them from evils; with the good He provides by
-leading them to good. Thus the Divine Providence is continually
-in the effort to save men; but more cannot be saved
-than desire to be saved. Those who acknowledge God and<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_166"></a>[166]</span>
-are led by Him, desire to be saved; and those who do not
-acknowledge God, but guide themselves, do not desire to be
-saved: for the latter do not think of eternal life and salvation,
-but the former do. This the Lord sees; but still He
-leads them according to the laws of His Divine Providence,
-against which He cannot act, for to act against them would
-be to act against Himself. Now, as the Lord foresees the
-states of all after death, and knows the places of those who
-are not willing to be saved, He, as far as is consistent with
-human freedom, labors to soften man’s evil; and if He cannot
-lead him to heaven, still preserves him from sinking to
-the lowest hell.</p>
-
-<p>From this it follows that every man may be reformed,
-that there is no such thing as predestination, and that it is a
-man’s own fault if he is not saved. All are created for
-heaven, and none for hell; and if man sink into perdition,
-he does so through his own obstinacy, and through the
-deliberate choice of a life of evil. As saith the Apostle:
-“The Lord is long-suffering to usward, <i>not willing that any
-should perish</i>, but that all should come to repentance.” 2
-Peter iii. 9. And the Lord himself says: “Fear not, little
-flock; it is your <i>Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom</i>.”
-Luke xii. 32.</p>
-
-<p>Such, in brief, are a few of the principles in the treatise
-on the Divine Providence. Nothing but a perusal of the
-work can give an adequate idea of its multiplicity of details,
-from the laws which regulate the affairs of kingdoms, to
-those which govern games of chance; and all expounded
-with a lucidity of thought, which finds few parallels in works
-on such recondite themes. No book in the whole circle
-of literature more satisfactorily disposes of the objections
-against religion, current among secularists and worldlings.
-The inward temptations and doubts of the devout heart, and
-the weariness, cares, and fret of life, are shown in its pages<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_167"></a>[167]</span>
-to be all permitted by that Divine Love which suffers not a
-sparrow to fall unheeded; and the minutest incidents of life
-are seen to be forever encircled by that Omniscience, which
-knows how most effectually to guard us from evil and draw
-us into the holy courts of heaven.</p>
-
-<p>Any view which we take of the Divine Providence that
-does not recognize this life as a beginning, a progress, and
-not a consummation, is necessarily erroneous. Life here is
-but a discipline, an apprenticeship. It is a school wherein
-we are scholars, learning such lessons as will fit us for uses
-in a higher and eternal sphere. Were life consummated by
-what men call death, we might have reason to complain
-that the comforts and pleasures of existence were so unequally
-distributed; and the natural man might exclaim with the
-Psalmist: “I was envious at the foolish, when I saw the
-prosperity of the wicked. They are not in trouble as other
-men; neither are they plagued like other men. Their eyes
-stand out with fatness: they have more than heart could
-wish. Behold, these are the ungodly who prosper in the
-world; they increase in riches.” But when we look at the
-matter from higher grounds, and in the light of the Divine
-wisdom, or as the Psalmist did when he said: “I went into
-the sanctuary of God; then understood I their end: how are
-they brought into desolation as in a moment! they are
-utterly consumed with terrors:”—“The evil doers shall be
-cut off; but those that wait upon the Lord, they shall inherit
-the earth: for yet a little while, and the wicked shall not
-be; yea thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall
-not be: for the Lord loveth judgment, and forsaketh not
-his saints;”—then we obtain a right view of the matter, and
-find an all-sufficient reason for being patient and not fretting
-ourselves. Hard though our lot in life may seem, let us
-remember that</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_168"></a>[168]</span></p>
-
-<div class="poetry-container">
-<div class="poetry">
- <div class="stanza">
- <div class="verse indent0">“The vain and fleeting things of earth,</div>
- <div class="verse indent2">(Though counted vain, alas! by few,)</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">In his esteem are nothing worth,</div>
- <div class="verse indent2">Who keeps eternal ends in view.”</div>
- </div>
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<p>Or, as Cowper says:</p>
-
-<div class="poetry-container">
-<div class="poetry">
- <div class="stanza">
- <div class="verse indent0">“The path of sorrow and that path alone,</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">Leads to the land where sorrow is unknown.</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">No traveler ever reached that blest abode</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">Who found not thorns and briers in his road.”</div>
- </div>
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_169"></a>[169]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XIX">CHAPTER XIX.</h2>
-
-<p><i>Life in Amsterdam—Character of the Dutch—Meets Dr. Beyer—Republishes
-his “New Method of Finding the Longitudes”—The
-Apocalypse Explained.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>It is very trying to the biographer of Swedenborg that he
-can find so little to narrate of his outward life. Of his life
-in Amsterdam we have no particulars whatever. No Boswell
-was there to note down his sayings, describe his doings,
-his company, and conduct. But had even a Boswell been
-there, we fear he would have found but little to note. Quiet
-days in his study, calm reserve toward all around, musing,
-solitary rambles in the streets, would supply but few incidents
-for the pen of the biographer. We must be content
-to know that, from out his quiet study in Amsterdam,
-proceeded books destined to be centers of spiritual light to
-the church and to the world.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg liked the Dutch, and with good reason, for
-he was favored to know them in that land where the secrets
-of all hearts are unveiled. He reports that the Dutch,
-above all other people, are under the influence of the
-<i>spiritual</i> love of trade, valuing it for its uses, and regarding
-money only as a means to these uses, and not, like the Jews,
-as the final end. They are, moreover, inflexible in their
-obedience to the truth, when known; and in many other
-respects are an estimable people.</p>
-
-<p>It is probable that Swedenborg returned home toward the
-end of 1764; for in the first half of the next year, we find
-him in Stockholm. Soon, however, he set out upon new<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_170"></a>[170]</span>
-travels; and in 1765, while at Gottenburg, waiting for a
-vessel to England, he accidentally (as men say) met with Dr.
-Beyer, Professor of Greek, and a member of the Consistory
-of Gottenburg. Having heard that Swedenborg was mad,
-he was surprised to hear him talk sensibly, and manifest no
-symptom of his suspected infirmity. He therefore invited
-Swedenborg to dine with him the following day, in company
-with Dr. Rosen. After dinner, Dr. Beyer expressed a desire
-to hear from himself a full account of his doctrines;
-upon which Swedenborg, animated by the request, spoke so
-clearly, and in so wonderful a manner, that the Doctor and
-his friend were quite astonished. They gave him no interruption;
-but when he ceased, Dr. Beyer requested Swedenborg
-to meet him the next day at Mr. Wenngren’s and to
-bring with him a paper, containing the substance of his conversation,
-in order that he might consider it more attentively.
-Swedenborg came the day following, according to promise;
-and, taking the paper out of his pocket, in the presence of
-the other two gentlemen, he trembled, and appeared much
-affected, the tears flowing down his cheeks. Presenting the
-paper to Dr. Beyer, “Sir,” said he, “from this day the
-Lord has introduced you into the society of angels, and you
-are now surrounded by them.” They were all greatly affected.
-He then took his leave, and the next day embarked
-for England.</p>
-
-<p>Dr. Beyer sent immediately for Swedenborg’s writings,
-and soon became deeply engrossed in their study. In order
-to arrange their subjects more distinctly in his mind, he set
-about compiling an Index to them; which as he prepared it,
-he sent, sheet by sheet, to Amsterdam to be printed. He
-was thirteen years in compiling the work, and on the day he
-sent off the last sheet corrected, he sickened, took to his bed,
-and in a few days departed to the spiritual world.</p>
-
-<p>The result of Dr. Beyer’s study of Swedenborg’s writings,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_171"></a>[171]</span>
-was a firm belief in their doctrines, and an open and enlightened
-advocacy of them, declaring in the public Consistory
-his full assent to them. As might naturally be expected,
-he suffered much obloquy and persecution for his adherence
-to the truth; but he was consoled in having the firm friendship
-of Swedenborg, and in being favored with receiving
-from him many letters, sympathizing with him in his trials,
-and answering many of his questions on doctrinal and
-psychological matters.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg did not make a long stay in England; but
-after a few weeks, or perhaps months, proceeded to Holland,
-spending the winter of 1765-66 at Amsterdam. There, in
-the spring of 1766, he republished (it is supposed by the
-solicitation of friends,) his youthful work on a “New Method
-of Finding the Longitudes.” “This method,” as he informed
-the Swedish Archbishop, Menander, “of calculating
-the ephemerides by pairs of stars, several persons in foreign
-countries were then employing, who had experienced great
-advantage by the observations made according to it for a
-series of years.”</p>
-
-<p>From the time of the completion of the Arcana Cœlestia,
-in 1756, Swedenborg had been gradually composing an extensive
-work on the Apocalypse. The exposition was continued
-as far as the tenth verse of the nineteenth chapter,
-filling four large quarto volumes. He then laid the work
-aside—thinking, probably, that it was too voluminous and
-elaborate—and commenced anew, but on a considerably reduced
-scale. The former Exposition, a clearly written
-manuscript, ready for the printer, after sustaining a narrow
-escape from burning, (the house of a gentleman who had it
-for perusal having caught fire,) was published in the original
-Latin, in four quarto volumes, in 1790, eighteen years after
-the author’s death. It was translated into English and
-printed in six octavos, under the title of the Apocalypse<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_172"></a>[172]</span>
-Explained, in 1815. It is a most valuable work, and one
-that could not well be spared from the Swedenborg Library.
-Within its pages are several distinct treatises on very important
-subjects, which, if extracted, would form complete
-and excellent books of themselves. The exposition of the
-spiritual sense of the text is very copiously illustrated by
-parallel passages from other parts of the Word; and thus
-it must ever be a most useful work to the New Church
-preacher, as affording him a ready key to the internal sense
-of the Scriptures.</p>
-
-<p>The shorter exposition Swedenborg himself published at
-Amsterdam, in 1766, under the title of the Apocalypse Revealed.
-As was his custom, he distributed copies of the
-work widely, sending it to the universities and superior
-clergy, and to many eminent persons in England, Holland,
-Germany, France, and Sweden.</p>
-
-<p>We will now make a few notes on some of the most remarkable
-features of Swedenborg’s exposition of that strange
-and mysterious book, the Apocalypse.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_173"></a>[173]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XX">CHAPTER XX.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>The Apocalypse Revealed.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>Every one who is acquainted with theological literature,
-knows that innumerable volumes of speculation have been
-written in attempted explanation of the Apocalypse. He
-is aware that expositors have differed about it from the earliest
-times; that Protestants have found Catholicism the
-subject of all its denunciations, and that Catholics have discovered
-that Paganism and Protestant heresy were in reality
-the matters alluded to; that sceptics have proved that it
-refers to none of these creeds, but is a worthless astrological
-treatise; and that many good Christians, vexed and wearied
-with this endless contest of opinion, have wished the book
-expunged from the canon of Scripture, as altogether incomprehensible,
-and a mere breeder of strife. And still the
-controversy goes on. The press swarms with volumes and
-pamphlets, all professing to have found the key to the mystery,
-informing the world of the future destiny of Europe,
-of the result of its wars and battles, the precise month of
-the fall of the Papacy, and the time of the descent of the
-New Jerusalem, the Second Advent, and the restoration of
-the Jews to Canaan, and, so far as the political arrangement
-of the kingdoms of the earth is concerned, almost superseding
-the necessity of newspapers to the credulous believer.
-Wise men generally now turn a deaf ear to these soothsayings,
-convinced by long and repeated experience of their
-utter futility, and thinking shrewdly enough that had the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_174"></a>[174]</span>
-Divine Providence intended that man should know the future,
-the foreknowledge would have been communicated
-intelligibly and not through the medium of mysteries interpreted
-by men more conspicuous for temerity than for any
-endowment of wisdom or common sense above their fellows.
-“It is a part of this prophecy,” as Sir Isaac Newton remarks,—and
-the same principle is applicable to all prophecies,—“that
-it should not be understood before the last age of the
-world; and therefore it makes for the credit of the prophecy
-that it is not yet [about 1710] understood. The folly
-of interpreters has been, to foretell times and things by this
-prophecy, as if God designed to make them prophets. By
-this rashness, they have not only exposed themselves, but
-brought the prophecy also into contempt. The design of
-God was much otherwise. He gave this, and other prophecies
-of the Old Testament, not to gratify men’s curiosity by
-enabling them to foreknow things, but that, after they
-were fulfilled, they might be interpreted by the events; and
-his own Providence, not the interpreters, be then manifested
-thereby to the world. For the event of things, predicted
-many ages before, will then be a convincing argument that
-the world is governed by Providence. For, as the few and
-obscure prophecies concerning Christ’s first coming, were for
-setting up the Christian religion, <i>which all nations have since
-corrupted</i>; so the many and clear prophecies concerning the
-things to be done at Christ’s second coming, are not only for
-predicting but also for effecting a recovery and re-establishment
-of the long-lost truth, and setting up a kingdom
-wherein dwells righteousness. The event will prove the
-Apocalypse; and this prophecy, thus proved and understood,
-will open the old prophets; and all together will make
-known the true religion, and establish it.”</p>
-
-<p>With no claim to superior understanding or acuteness did
-Swedenborg present his exposition of this mysterious book<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_175"></a>[175]</span>
-to the world. He humbly declares that the mysteries of
-the Apocalypse are totally beyond the power of human intellect
-to unravel, and that whatever of truth is to be found
-in his work, owed its existence to the immediate illustration
-of his mind by the Lord. We shall presently show
-what powerful reason there was for this protestation on his
-part.</p>
-
-<p>The Apocalypse, we are taught, is a portion of the Divine
-Word. It was dictated directly by the Lord,—John, in
-Patmos, being simply an amanuensis.</p>
-
-<p>The Apocalypse is a prophetic book, descriptive of the
-decline and consummation of the Christian Church, and the
-establishment of the new and spiritual dispensation signified
-by “the New Jerusalem descending from God out of
-heaven.” Being a prophetic book, it would have been at
-variance with the laws of the Divine Providence for man to
-have understood its prophecies until after the events it described
-were past; for, as we have seen, a knowledge of the
-future would take from man all freedom of action, all inclination
-to labor, and the whole hope and pleasure of life.
-Therefore it was that the Apocalypse remained a sealed
-book until the Christian Church had reached its consummation,
-and the Last Judgment was effected, in 1757, when
-the Lord graciously opened the eyes of Swedenborg and
-manifested to him, in clear light, the deep mysteries of this
-prophecy.</p>
-
-<p>Wilkinson, in his admirable Biography, well says: “A
-volume, unless it were a reprint, would not give an analysis
-of the Apocalypse Revealed. When we say that the commentary
-takes the text word by word, and translates it into
-spirit, we still convey but a slender idea of what is done.
-Our own first impressions on reading the work will not soon
-be forgotten. Following the writer through the long breadths
-and flights of this vast empyrean, we were momently in<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_176"></a>[176]</span>
-anxious fear that to sustain a context of such was impossible.
-Each fresh chapter seemed like a space that mortal
-wing must not attempt; and yet the fear was groundless, for
-our guide sailed onward with a tranquil motion as if he knew
-the stars. History and common sense, panting and grasping
-science, philosophy in its better part, above all, the confidence
-in a Divine support and a supernal mission, appeared
-to be covertly and unexpectedly present, to annihilate difficulties,
-and pave the skyey way of this humble voyager.
-And when we had again alighted from that perusal which
-strained every faculty to the utmost, it was as though we
-had been there before, so entire was the impression of self-evidence
-that was left upon the mind. Genesis and the
-Revelation were closely at one in this marvellous Apocalypse—thenceforth
-the most open of the Bible pages: the
-two ends of the Scripture called to each other; an arch of
-Divine light spanned the river of the Word, and the original
-Eden blossomed anew in the midst of the street of the holy
-city.”</p>
-
-<p>The Rev. O. P. Hiller, in his Memoir of Swedenborg,
-writes: “In the Apocalypse Revealed, the mysterious book
-is taken up and examined chapter by chapter, verse by
-verse, word by word, in the same manner as was done with
-the books of Genesis and Exodus in the Arcana Cœlestia;
-and the interior meaning, the spiritual sense, of every part,
-set forth in such a manner as to present a clear, connected,
-and rational meaning throughout the whole book, from the
-first chapter to the last. And what is especially to be
-remarked, the spiritual sense of this book, the last of the
-New Testament, is shown to be founded on the same principles,
-and discovered by the same rules of interpretation, as
-the spiritual sense of the books of Genesis and Exodus, the
-first of the Old Testament, written, as they were, by other
-hands, and more than fifteen hundred years before; a strong<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_177"></a>[177]</span>
-proof, certainly, that however varied the human instruments
-there was One Divine Author of the whole. Thus, with
-any particular word, for instance, occurring in the book
-of Genesis, and declared to have a certain spiritual signification,—when
-that word occurs in the book of Revelation, it
-is shown to have the same signification; and this holds good
-in all cases. And, moreover, while all these various significations,
-taken together, make in the book of Genesis a
-complete spiritual sense, so in the book of Revelation they
-make their own complete spiritual sense. Now it will be
-readily seen, that such a coincidence would be altogether
-unaccountable, nay, impossible, unless there really existed
-such a spiritual sense in the Word of God: and it is, indeed,
-this uniform spiritual sense, full of high and heavenly truth,
-that raises the holy volume infinitely above all other works
-of history or morals; and the existence of such a sense is
-the strongest proof of the Divine character of those writings
-which we call the Sacred Scriptures. And truly, had
-Swedenborg done only this, he would have deserved the
-gratitude of all who seriously revere the Word of God, for
-thus bringing a new and most powerful argument from
-internal evidence, in favor of the inspiration and divinity
-of the sacred volume.”</p>
-
-<p>Well, then, might Swedenborg disclaim the authorship
-of the ideas in the Apocalypse Revealed, and ask: “What
-man can draw such things from himself?” Those who tell
-us that Swedenborg was self-deceived, must either know very
-little of what they speak about, or must be quite as ignorant
-of the capacity of the human mind and its powers of invention.
-For ourselves, we could as readily believe that Swedenborg
-created the world, as we could believe that the
-spiritual sense of the Apocalypse, and of the whole Word,
-was a fiction of his brain. Were the spiritual sense of the
-Word such a fiction, then it must be said that there lived a<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_178"></a>[178]</span>
-man in the last century, with an intellect and creative
-faculty, compared with which those of all the philosophers
-and poets of past and present time combined, were as
-nothing. We leave revilers of Swedenborg to make their
-choice; either to admit the existence of the spiritual sense
-of the Word; or, denying its existence, and pronouncing
-Swedenborg’s discovery either a delusion or an imposture,
-to admit that Swedenborg was a man wholly unique—a
-genius infinitely surpassing any which the world has ever
-known, and endowed with a power of invention which the
-mind of a nation incarnate in one man could never hope to
-rival.</p>
-
-<p>But it will never come to such a pass. Anyone who will
-take the trouble candidly to examine the subject, will become
-convinced of the spiritual sense of the Word, and of the
-truth of Swedenborg’s revelations regarding it. The denial
-and mockery of them can only coexist with an ignorance,
-more or less profound, of their nature; or, worse still, from
-a hatred of the truth, grounded in the life and love of evil.
-The spiritual sense of the Word is no invention. It is a
-discovery,—accomplished by Divine means, however,—just
-as the finding of Australia was a discovery; and we shall
-believe in its existence if we become <i>practically</i> acquainted
-with it through reverent thought and study; even as We
-should know Australia best, did we go there.</p>
-
-<p>It may be said: “Well, suppose the spiritual sense of the
-Apocalypse does describe the fall of the Christian Church,
-and the inauguration of the New Church; and typifies the
-doctrine of justification by faith alone by the Dragon; and
-the Romanists and their lust of dominion and atrocious
-deeds by Babylon and the great Harlot sitting upon many
-waters; what then? It is true such descriptions must ever
-have a certain interest, but not sufficient to render them
-subjects of universal study in all ages, and worthily forming<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_179"></a>[179]</span>
-a part of that Divine Book which is read by angels in
-heaven, as well as by men on earth.” The objection is a
-sound one so far as it goes, but it is made in ignorance of a
-great but very simple truth, namely, that all that is true
-of a church is true of an individual. The trust in mere
-truth in the intellect, and the lust of power and glory,—the
-former signified by the Dragon, and the latter by Babylon,—are
-evils which exist in all minds to a greater or less degree;
-and the Divine description of their nature and awful consequences
-may be thought of apart from any idea of Geneva
-or Rome. The Apocalypse being a divine work, has infinite
-applications, and will be read to eternity in spheres where
-the names of Romanist and Protestant are unknown; and in
-societies of glorified spirits, compared with whose number
-and influence this world is insignificant.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_180"></a>[180]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XXI">CHAPTER XXI.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Travels—Habits—Anecdotes.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>In April, 1766, Swedenborg again visited England in
-order to observe the effect of his writings upon the English
-people. Of this visit we have no account, except in reference
-to its conclusion, in September of the same year, when he
-returned to Stockholm. Mr. Springer, the Swedish Consul
-in London, an old friend of Swedenborg’s, has left the following
-interesting record of some incidents connected with
-his return.</p>
-
-<p>“Swedenborg was about to depart for Sweden, and desired
-me to procure him a good captain, which I did. I made
-the agreement with a person named Dixon. Swedenborg’s
-effects were carried on board the vessel, and as his apartments
-were at some distance from the port, we took, for that
-night, a chamber at an inn near it, because the captain of
-the vessel was to come and fetch him in the morning. Swedenborg
-went to bed; and I went to sit in another room,
-with the master of the house, with whom I was conversing.
-We both heard a remarkable noise, and could not apprehend
-what it could be, and therefore drew near to a door, where
-there was a little window that looked into the chamber
-where Swedenborg lay. We saw him with his arms raised
-toward heaven, and his body appeared to tremble. He
-spoke much for the space of half an hour, but we could understand
-nothing of what he said, except that when he let
-his hands fall down, we heard him say with a loud voice,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_181"></a>[181]</span>
-‘My God!’ But we could not hear what he said more. He
-remained afterwards very quietly in his bed. I entered into
-his chamber with the master of the house, and asked him if
-he was ill. ‘No,’ said he; ‘but I have had a long discourse
-with some of the heavenly friends, and am at this time in a
-great perspiration.’ And as his effects were embarked on
-board the vessel, he asked the master of the house to let
-him have a shirt; he then went again to bed, and slept till
-morning.</p>
-
-<p>“When the captain of the vessel came to fetch Swedenborg,
-I took my leave of him, and wished him a happy
-voyage. I then asked the captain if he was provided with
-good and necessary provisions. He answered me, that he
-had as much as was needful for the voyage. On this, Swedenborg
-said: ‘My friend, we shall not need a great quantity:
-for this day week we shall, by the aid of God, enter the port
-of Stockholm at two o’clock.’ It happened exactly as he
-foretold, as Dixon informed me; saying, that a violent gale
-accelerated the voyage, that the wind was favorable at every
-turn of the vessel, and that he never in all his life had so
-prosperous a voyage.”</p>
-
-<p>Arriving at Stockholm on the 8th of September, Swedenborg
-resided in the Sudermalm, the southern suburb of the
-city. Robsahm tells us: “His house was built and arranged
-after his own taste; the apartments were rather small, but
-suitable for himself. Although he was a man of most profound
-learning, no other books were seen in his study than
-the Hebrew and Greek Bible, together with his own indexes
-to his works, whereby he saved himself the trouble, when referring
-to different passages, of going through all he had
-before written.</p>
-
-<p>“Adjoining the house was a rather large garden, in the
-midst of which he had a summer-house, or pavilion. There
-were four doors to the apartment, which formed a square,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_182"></a>[182]</span>
-and was occasionally turned, in an instant, into an octagon,
-by means of four other doors that belonged to it. One of
-these doors shut with a secret lock, which being opened,
-there appeared a glass door placed opposite a fine green hedge,
-where a bird was seen in a cage. This new spectacle produced
-an agreeable surprise of a second garden to the person
-who opened the door, which Swedenborg used to say was
-more agreeable than the first. At the entrance of the garden
-there was a parterre, well covered with flowers, which he was
-very fond of. He derived no other advantage from the
-garden, for he gave the whole produce of it to the gardener
-who waited on him; so also that of a very excellent greenhouse,
-in which he took much pleasure.</p>
-
-<p>“The gardener and his wife were the only servants he
-had; of the latter he never desired other service than that
-of making his bed, and of bringing water into his apartment.
-He generally made his own coffee on the fire in his study,
-and took much of it, well sweetened. When at home, his
-dinner consisted of a small loaf put into boiled milk, and at
-that time he neither drank wine nor any spirituous liquor,
-nor did he take any supper. Though he was very sparing
-in his eating and drinking, yet he would sometimes, when in
-company, take a glass of wine, but was always in one equal
-temper of mind, and cheerful.</p>
-
-<p>“He had a fire constantly kept up in his study, from
-autumn, throughout the winter, until spring; but his bedroom,
-contrary to the usual custom in Sweden, was always
-cold; and according as the cold was more or less severe, he
-made use of three, or four, blankets. When he awoke, he
-went into his study, where there were always live coals, on
-which he laid wood, with birch-bark, having a number of
-small bundles ready for use, and to make a quick fire before
-he sat down to write.</p>
-
-<p>“In his parlor was a table of black marble, on which, one<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_183"></a>[183]</span>
-would have supposed, at first sight, that a hand of cards had
-been carelessly thrown, the imitation being so perfect. He
-made a present of this table to the Royal College of Mines,
-who preserve it with great care. This room was neat and
-genteel, but furnished in a plain style.</p>
-
-<p>“His wardrobe was simple, yet suitable to the season. He
-wore in winter a fur gown; and when at home, in summer,
-a morning robe.</p>
-
-<p>“He spoke very distinctly. When he began to talk in
-company, every one was silent, as well from the pleasure
-they had in hearing his discourse, as from a sense of his well
-known great erudition, which he did not show but on occasions
-in which he found himself compelled to prove his assertions,
-or the little weight of the arguments of some with
-whom he conversed. Besides the learned languages, in
-which he was well versed, he understood the French, English,
-Dutch, German, and Italian.”</p>
-
-<p>We are thankful indeed for these details, trifling though
-they are. They evince the quiet practical character of Swedenborg,
-and the strong common sense which guarded him
-from all extravagance and eccentricity.</p>
-
-<p>From the gardener’s wife, Robsahm received the following
-statement:—“Entering one day, after dinner, into Swedenborg’s
-chamber, I saw his eyes like unto a most bright flame.
-I drew back, saying, ‘In the name of goodness, Sir, what
-has happened extraordinary to you? for you have a very
-peculiar appearance.’ ‘What kind of look have I?’ answered
-he. I then told him what struck me. ‘Well, well,’
-replied he, which was his favorite expression, ‘don’t be frightened,
-the Lord has so disposed my eyes, that by them spirits
-may see what is in our world.’” In a short time this appearance
-passed away, as he said it would. “I know,” said she
-to Robsahm, “when he has conversed with heavenly spirits,
-for there is a pleasure and calm satisfaction in his countenance,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_184"></a>[184]</span>
-which charm those who see it; but after he has conversed
-with evil spirits, he has a sorrowful look.”</p>
-
-<p>Concerning his temptations, they said that their master,
-in the night, often spoke aloud, when evil spirits were with
-him, which they could easily hear, their room being adjoining.
-When asked what caused his disturbance in the night,
-he answered that it had been permitted the evil spirits to
-blaspheme, and that he had spoken against them zealously.
-It happened often that, weeping bitterly, he cried with a
-loud voice, and prayed to the Lord that he might not be
-forsaken in his temptation, when they assailed him. His
-words were, ‘Lord help me! Lord, my God, do not forsake
-me!’ Those who saw him in these states, supposed he was
-sick; but when delivered from them, he returned thanks to
-God, and said to those who were troubled for him, ‘God be
-eternally praised! Comfort yourselves, my friends, all has
-passed away; and be assured that nothing happens to me
-but what the Lord permits, who never lays a burden on us
-more weighty than we are able to bear.’</p>
-
-<p>Once it was remarkable that after such a state he went to
-bed, and did not rise for several days and nights. This gave
-his domestics much uneasiness, and they consulted together,
-and supposed he was dead. They intended to break open
-the door, or to call their neighbors. At last the gardener
-went to the window, and discovered, to his great joy, that
-his master was alive, and turning in his bed. The next
-day he rang the bell. The woman went in, and related her
-own and her husband’s uneasiness for him. He told her
-with a cheerful countenance, that he had been very well, and
-had wanted nothing.</p>
-
-<p>The following anecdote, narrated to Robsahm by the gardener’s
-wife, places Swedenborg’s moral courage in a strong
-light, and shows the use of judicious plain speaking. Bishop
-Halenius, the successor of Swedenborg’s father, paying Swedenborg<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_185"></a>[185]</span>
-a visit one day, the conversation turned on the
-nature of common sermons. Swedenborg said to the bishop,
-“You insert things that are false in yours;” on this, the
-bishop told the gardener, who was present, to retire, but
-Swedenborg commanded him to stay. The conversation
-went on, and both turned over the Hebrew and Greek Bibles,
-to show the texts that were agreeable to their assertions.
-At length the interview ended, by some observations intended
-as reproaches to the bishop on his avarice and various
-unjust actions; “You have already prepared yourself a place
-in hell,” said Swedenborg: “but,” added he, “I predict that
-some months hence you will be attacked with a grievous illness,
-during which time the Lord will seek to convert you. If
-you then open your heart to his holy inspirations, your conversion
-will take place. When this happens, write to me
-for my theological works, and I will send them to you.”
-Some months after, an officer from the province and bishopric
-of Skara visited Swedenborg. On being asked how
-bishop Halenius was, he replied: “He has been very ill, but
-at present he is quite recovered, and has become altogether
-another person, being now a practicer of what is good, full
-of probity, and returns sometimes three or four-fold of the
-property which he had before unjustly taken into his possession.”
-From that time to the hour of his death, he was one
-of the greatest supporters of the doctrine of the New Church
-of the Lord, and declared openly, that the theological writings
-of Swedenborg were the most precious treasures given
-for the welfare of mankind. What a blessed result was
-this of the few severe but really kind words of Swedenborg,
-spoken in season!</p>
-
-<p>In Stockholm, Swedenborg was very accessible, and visitors
-sought his advice for all purposes. Widows went to
-him to inquire about the state of their husbands in the other
-world; and others fancying him a wizard, beset him with<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_186"></a>[186]</span>
-questions about lost and stolen property. Notwithstanding
-the number and frequency of these visits, from people of
-all ranks, he would never receive any particular ones, and
-more especially those of females, without one of his domestics
-being present. He also required his visitors to speak
-in the language of the country, saying, “I will have witnesses
-of my discourse and conduct, that all pretensions to
-malicious assertions and scandal may be taken away.” He
-had probably suffered from the tongues of busybodies: it
-would have been strange if he had not; and it was prudent
-for him to take this effectual plan to cut away the foundation
-of all idle and malicious gossip.</p>
-
-<p>Nicholas Collin, a young clergyman, at this time visited
-Swedenborg, and thus pleasantly narrates his interview.
-“In 1765, I went to reside at Stockholm, where I continued
-for nearly three years. During that time, Swedenborg was
-a great object of public attention in the metropolis, and his
-extraordinary character was a frequent topic of discussion.
-He resided at his house in the southern suburbs, which was
-in a pleasant situation, neat and convenient, with a spacious
-garden and other appendages. There he received company.
-Not seldom he also appeared in company, and mixed in private
-society; sufficient opportunities were therefore given to
-observe him. I collected much information from several
-respectable persons who had conversed with him; which was
-the more easy, as I lived the whole time as a private tutor
-in the family of Dr. Celsius, a gentleman of distinguished
-talents, who afterwards became bishop of Scania. He, and
-many of the eminent persons that frequented his house,
-knew Swedenborg well.</p>
-
-<p>“In the summer of 1766, I waited on him at his house.
-Introducing myself with an apology for the freedom I took,
-I assured him that it was not in the least from youthful presumption.
-I was then twenty, but had a strong desire to<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_187"></a>[187]</span>
-converse with a character so celebrated. He received me very
-kindly. It being early in the afternoon, delicate coffee,
-without eatables, was served, agreeable to the Swedish custom;
-he was also, like pensive men in general, fond of this
-beverage. We conversed for nearly three hours; principally
-on the nature of human souls, and their states in the invisible
-world; discussing the principal theories of psychology by
-various authors. He asserted positively, as he often
-does in his works, that he had intercourse with spirits of deceased
-persons. I presumed, therefore, to request of him,
-as a great favor, to procure me an interview with my brother,
-who had departed this life a few months before, a young
-clergyman, and esteemed for his devotion, erudition, and
-virtue. He answered, that God, having for good and wise
-purposes separated the world of spirits from ours, a communication
-is never granted without cogent reasons; and asked
-what my motives were. I confessed that I had none besides
-gratifying brotherly affection, and an ardent wish to explore
-scenes so sublime and interesting to a serious mind. He replied,
-that my motives were good, but not sufficient; but
-that if any important spiritual or temporal concern of mine
-had been the case, he would then have solicited permission
-from those angels who regulate these matters. He showed
-me his garden. It had an agreeable building, a wing of
-which was a kind of temple, to which he often retired for
-contemplation; its dim religious light rendering it suitable
-for such a purpose.</p>
-
-<p>“We parted with mutual satisfaction; and he presented by
-me, to the said Dr. Celsius, an elegant copy of his Apocalypsis
-Revelata, then lately printed in Amsterdam.”</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg was of a very mild temper, upright, just, and
-incapable of perverting the truth. Robsahm, one day, asked
-him if a certain preacher, lately deceased, and greatly esteemed
-in Stockholm for his flowery sermons, had a place in<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_188"></a>[188]</span>
-heaven. “No,” said Swedenborg, “he went directly into the
-abyss; for he left his devotion in the pulpit: he was not pious,
-but a hypocrite; proud and greatly vain of the gifts he had
-received from nature, and the goods of fortune he was continually
-seeking to acquire. Truly,” continued he, “false
-appearances will stand us in no stead hereafter; they are all
-separated from man at his decease; the mask then falls from
-him; and it is then made manifest to all, whether he is inwardly
-good or evil.”</p>
-
-<p>The exact month of Swedenborg’s next foreign travel is
-uncertain; but just before he undertook it, Robsahm met
-him in his carriage, and asked him how he could venture to
-take a voyage to London, at the age of eighty, and expressed
-a fear lest he should not see him again. “Be not uneasy,
-my friend,” said he, “if you live, we shall see one another
-again, for I have yet another voyage of this kind to make.”</p>
-
-<p>At Elsinore, on these voyages, he frequently visited M.
-Rahling, the Swedish Consul, and during this transit, he
-made the acquaintance of General Tuxen, at the Consul’s
-table. The General asked him how a man might be certain
-whether he was on the road to salvation or not. Swedenborg
-answered, “That is very easy. A man need only examine
-himself and his thoughts by the Ten Commandments; as,
-for instance, whether he loves and fears God; whether he is
-happy in seeing the welfare of others, and does not envy
-them; whether on having received a great injury from others,
-which may have excited him to anger and to meditate revenge,
-he afterwards changes his sentiments, because God
-has said that vengeance is His, and so on; then he may rest
-assured that he is on the road to heaven: but when he discovers
-himself actuated by contrary sentiments, he may
-know that he is on the road to hell.”</p>
-
-<p>This led Tuxen to think of himself, as well as others; and
-he asked Swedenborg whether he had seen King Frederick V.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_189"></a>[189]</span>
-of Denmark, deceased in 1766, adding that though some
-human frailty attached to him, yet he had certain hopes that
-he was happy. Swedenborg said, “Yes, I have seen him,
-and he is well off; and not only he, but all the kings of the
-house of Oldenburg, who are associated together. This is
-not the happy case with our Swedish kings.” Swedenborg
-then told him that he had seen no one so splendidly ministered
-to in the world of spirits as the Empress Elizabeth of
-Russia, who died in 1762. As Tuxen expressed astonishment
-at this, Swedenborg continued: “I can also tell you
-the reason, which few would surmise. With all her faults,
-she had a good heart, and a certain consideration in her
-negligence. This induced her to put off signing many
-papers that were from time to time presented to her, and
-which at last so accumulated that she could not examine
-them, but was obliged to sign as many as possible on the
-representation of her ministers; after which she would retire
-to her closet, fall on her knees, and beg God’s forgiveness,
-if she, against her will, had signed anything that was
-wrong.”</p>
-
-<p>At the conclusion of this interesting interview, Swedenborg
-went on board his vessel, leaving a firm friend and future
-disciple in General Tuxen. Some years after, Tuxen
-wrote: “I thank our Lord, the God of heaven, that I have
-been acquainted with this great man and his writings. I
-esteem this as the greatest blessing I ever experienced in
-this life, and hope I shall profit by it in working out my
-salvation.”</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg’s stay in London at this time must have been
-brief; for on the 28th of November, 1768, we meet him
-again in Amsterdam, whither he had gone to print another
-important work, “Conjugial Love, and its chaste Delights;
-also Adulterous Love and its insane Pleasures.” This
-book he published with his name, as written “by Emanuel<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_190"></a>[190]</span>
-Swedenborg, a Swede.” This is the first of his theological
-works to which he affixed his name. His reason for giving
-it in this instance, is said to have been, that no other person
-might be censured for writing on this delicate subject. We
-will now examine the contents of this wondrous book.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_191"></a>[191]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XXII">CHAPTER XXII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Conjugial Love.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>A wise man might well suspect the soundness of any
-system of morals which did not take into careful consideration
-the conjugial relation. Marriage—the most important
-event in life, the relation which occupies the whole thought
-of one sex, and the most serious regards of the other, the
-institution around which all that is highest find holiest in
-life groups itself, family, home, all that human hearts hold
-dear—must ever hold a prominent place in a true code of
-moral and spiritual laws. How then could the subject be
-omitted from the heavenly writings of the New Jerusalem?
-or how could its apostle forget or pass it by.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg, in his treatise on Conjugial Love, first speaks
-of marriages in heaven. He shows that a man lives a man
-after death, and that a woman lives a woman; and since it
-was ordained from creation that the woman should be for
-the man, and the man for the woman, and thus that each
-should be the other’s,—and since that love is innate in both,
-it follows that there are marriages in heaven as well as on
-earth.</p>
-
-<p>Marriage in the heavens is the conjunction of two into one
-mind. The mind of man consists of two parts, the understanding
-and the will. When these two parts act in unity,
-they are called one mind. The understanding is predominant
-in man, and the will in woman; but in the marriage
-of minds there is no predominance, for the will of the wife<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_192"></a>[192]</span>
-becomes also the will of the husband, and the understanding
-of the husband is also that of the wife; because each
-loves to will and to think as the other wills and thinks, and
-thus they will and think mutually and reciprocally. Hence
-their conjunction; so that in heaven, two married partners
-are not called two, but one angel. When this conjunction
-of minds descends into the inferior principles which are of
-the body, it is perceived and felt as love, and that love is
-conjugial love.</p>
-
-<p>To this doctrine of marriage in heaven will arise an objection
-from the Lord’s words to the Sadducees, when they
-asked Him whose wife, in the resurrection, a woman should
-be, who had been married in succession to seven brethren.
-The Lord replied: “The children of this world marry, and
-are given in marriage; but they which shall be accounted
-worthy to obtain that world and the resurrection from the
-dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage.”—Luke xx.
-34, 35. To understand this reply, we must bear in mind the
-nature of the question. A woman had been married, quite
-in accordance with worldly usage, to seven husbands. Of
-course, nothing of this kind takes place in heaven; for, as
-the Lord says, there “neither can they die any more.” After
-that fashion indeed there is no marrying or giving in
-marriage in heaven. In truth, marriages, such as they are
-in heaven, could never have been comprehended by the gross
-and carnal-minded Jews; and had the Lord entered into
-detail, He would have been as grossly misapprehended by
-them as when He said, “Destroy this temple, and in three
-days I will raise it up.” And they said: “Forty and six
-years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up
-in three days?” not knowing that he “spake of the temple
-of his body.” John ii. 19-21. Now Swedenborg very
-plainly shows that Christians think as naturally of marriage
-as the Jews did of the temple, if they suppose that the true<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_193"></a>[193]</span>
-marriage of minds does not take place in heaven, or that it
-was any but the carnal and sensual connections of earth
-that the Lord declared had no place in eternity. In the
-spiritual sense of the Lord’s words, by the marriage that
-does not take place in heaven, is meant the spiritual marriage,
-or union of goodness and truth in the mind; in other
-words, regeneration: this must be accomplished in this life,
-or not at all. When the spiritual sense of the Word is understood,
-this interpretation becomes manifest as the only
-true and rational mode of understanding the text; and all
-the rest of Scripture goes to confirm it.</p>
-
-<p>Moreover it is true that there is no marriage in heaven in
-the exact sense of the word. Partners are born into this
-world, and by life in it are disciplined for each other.
-Separate, they are but parts of one whole; and in each
-there is a continual longing for unition. Seen by the eye
-of Omniscience, they are ever married; they are one, however
-divided they may be by space or circumstances. Their
-meeting in heaven and recognition of each other is only the
-external completion of what had before in essentials been
-effected. And in this sense it may be said that there are no
-marriages in heaven; for all are married, in reality, before
-they reach heaven.</p>
-
-<p>Marriages on earth, Swedenborg teaches, are at this day
-entered upon so generally from merely worldly and sensual
-motives, and with so little regard for similarity of mind,
-that, save in few cases, they are not maintained and perpetuated
-in the other life. Married partners commonly meet
-after death; but as their internal differences of mind are
-manifested, they separate; for no married partners can be
-received into heaven, except such as have been interiorly
-united, or are capable of being so united into one; which is
-understood by the Lord’s words: “They are no longer two,
-but one flesh.” Such as are thus separated—possibly both<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_194"></a>[194]</span>
-very good people—meet, in due time, congenial partners,
-whose souls incline to union with their own, so that they no
-longer wish to be two lives, but one.</p>
-
-<p>The meeting of young partners in heaven is thus charmingly
-described:—“The divine providence of the Lord
-extends to everything, even to the minutest particulars
-concerning marriages, because all the delights of heaven
-spring from the delights of conjugial love, as sweet waters
-from the fountain head. On this account it is provided that
-conjugial pairs be born, and these pairs are continually
-educated to their several marriages under the Lord’s auspices,
-neither the boy nor the girl knowing anything of the
-matter; and after a stated time, when both of them become
-marriageable, they meet in some place as by chance, and see
-each other, and in this case they instantly know, as by a
-kind of instinct, that they are pairs; and by a kind of inward
-dictate, think within themselves—the youth that she is mine,
-and the virgin that he is mine; and when this thought has
-existed some time in the mind of each, they accost each
-other from a deliberate purpose, and betroth themselves.
-It is said as by chance, by instinct, and by dictate, and the
-meaning is by Divine Providence: since, while the Divine
-Providence is unknown, it has such an appearance; for the
-Lord opens internal similitudes, that they may see each
-other.”</p>
-
-<p>We are now led by Swedenborg, and introduced to a
-knowledge of the nature of conjugial love, and shown in what
-consists its essential blessedness. He shows that this love
-originates in the marriage of goodness and truth. Every
-one who has experienced anything of regeneration, knows
-that there is no bliss so intense, no joy so extatic, as that
-arising from well-doing, and submission to the will of the
-Lord. When right is done because it is right, when truth
-in the understanding is carried into action, then good is<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_195"></a>[195]</span>
-inseminated in the will by the Lord, and conjoining itself to
-truth in the understanding, the soul overflows with the
-sweetest peace, and the most interior delight. The conjunction
-of goodness and truth is the heavenly marriage, to
-which the Lord compares the kingdom of heaven; and He
-says that it is not here, nor there, but within us. Under the
-symbols of marriage and love, the regeneration of the soul
-is continually described in the Word; and the meeting
-of Jacob and Rachel at the well, when “Jacob kissed
-Rachel,” and for very joy, “lifted up his voice and wept,”
-beautifully typifies the meeting of goodness and truth, and
-the gladness resulting from their approaching union.</p>
-
-<p>It was said that in man the understanding predominates,
-and in woman the will. In the mind of each, then, it is
-evident, there never can be a perfect marriage, seeing that
-individual minds are in themselves imperfect, the balance
-of the will and intellect being in no case equal. The mental
-perfection or <i>wholeness</i> of man then necessitates marriage.
-Truth loves good, and good loves truth; and so the will and
-the understanding ever long for conjunction. It is plain,
-then, that in man there must always be an unsatisfied desire,
-if he remain by himself; and so, also, to even a greater
-degree, with the woman. This insatiable desire for conjunction
-of soul, can not well appear in its strength in this life
-for many reasons; nor can it receive here its full satisfaction,
-as it will in eternity.</p>
-
-<p>True conjugial love can exist only between two; and in
-polygamists and adulterers it is utterly destroyed. Again,
-it can only exist with the regenerate, with those who love
-the Lord and their neighbor, and delight in keeping the
-divine commandments. In proportion as married partners
-so live, they become more and more closely and interiorly
-conjoined; and their minds flowing into one, their peace,
-joy, and bliss are ineffably increased. With the wicked<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_196"></a>[196]</span>
-there is no conjugial love. Their life, being internally evil,
-conceals the deepest hatred; and the apparent affection
-which they may display in the world, arises either from
-sensual love, or worldly expediency. Be it well noted by
-all, that marriage can yield real happiness only to the
-religious—to those who love God and honor His laws.</p>
-
-<p>It is impossible for us to give, even by way of catalogue,
-a view of the details into which the treatise on Conjugial
-Love enters. It is so richly studded with great principles,
-that no condensation is possible. It is thus with all of
-Swedenborg’s books; so that an exhaustive review is impossible.
-He never treats his readers to long moralizings that
-can be condensed into one paragraph; but all his writings
-are crowded with thought, so that one is prompted not to
-condensation, but to expansion. This excuse, which we have
-had to present on previous occasions, must form our apology
-for the following extracts, selected as illustrations of some
-of the leading truths in this treatise.</p>
-
-<p><i>The Delights of Conjugial Love.</i>—“As conjugial love is the
-foundation love of all good loves, and as it is inscribed on all
-the parts and principles of man, even to the most particular,
-it follows that its delights exceed the delights of all other
-loves, and also that it gives delight to the other loves, according
-to its presence and conjunction with them; for it
-expands the inmost principles of the mind, and at the same
-time the inmost principles of the body, as the most delightful
-current of its fountain flows through and opens them.
-The reason why all delights, from first to last, are collated
-into this love, is on account of the superior excellence of its
-use, which is the propagation of the human race, and thence
-of the angelic heaven; and as this use was the chief end of
-creation, it follows that all the beatitudes, satisfactions, delights,
-pleasantnesses, and pleasures, which the Lord the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_197"></a>[197]</span>
-Creator could possibly confer upon man, are collated into
-this love.”—n. 68.</p>
-
-<p><i>Love truly Conjugial is essential Chastity.</i>—“The reasons
-are, 1. Because it is from the Lord, and corresponds to the
-marriage of the Lord and the church. 2. Because it
-descends from the marriage of good and truth. 3. Because
-it is spiritual, in proportion as the church exists with man.
-4. Because it is the foundation love, and head of all celestial
-and spiritual loves. 5. Because it is the orderly seminary
-of the human race, and thereby of the angelic heaven.
-6. Because on this account it also exists with the angels
-of heaven, and gives birth with them to spiritual offspring,
-which are love and wisdom. 7. And because its uses are
-thus more excellent than the other uses of creation. From
-these considerations, it follows that love truly conjugial,
-viewed from its origin and its essence, is pure and holy, so
-that it may be called purity and holiness, consequently,
-essential chastity.”—n. 143.</p>
-
-<p><i>Conjugial Love in Ancient Times.</i>—“I have been informed
-by the angels, that those who lived in the most ancient
-times, live at this day in the heavens, in separate houses,
-families, and nations, as they lived on earth, <i>and that scarce
-any one of a house is wanting</i>; and that the reason is, because
-they were principled in love truly conjugial; and that hence
-their children inherited inclinations to the conjugial principles
-of good and truth, and were easily initiated into it
-more and more interiorly by education received from their
-parents, and afterwards as from themselves, when they
-became capable of judging for themselves, were introduced
-into it by the Lord.”—n. 205.</p>
-
-<p><i>Marriage elevates Humanity to its Highest Form.</i>—“The
-most perfect and noble human form results from the conjunction
-of two forms, by marriage, so as to become one
-form; thus from two fleshes becoming one flesh according to<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_198"></a>[198]</span>
-creation. In such a case the man’s mind is elevated into
-superior light, and the wife’s into superior heat.”—n. 201.</p>
-
-<p><i>The Children of Good Parents.</i>—“Children born of parents
-who are principled in love truly conjugial, derive from
-their parents the conjugial principle of good and truth, by
-virtue whereof they have an inclination and faculty, if sons,
-to perceive the things appertaining to wisdom, and if daughters,
-to love those things which wisdom teaches. Hence a
-superior suitableness and facility to grow wise, is inherited
-by those who are born from such a marriage, and also to
-imbibe the things relating to the church and heaven.”—n.
-202-4.</p>
-
-<p>The capacity of women to perform the duties of men, and
-men those of women, is thus spoken of.</p>
-
-<p>“The wife can not enter into the duties proper to the
-man, nor on the other hand the man into the duties proper
-to the wife, because they differ like wisdom and the love
-thereof, or like understanding and the will thereof. In the
-duties proper to the man, the primary agent is the understanding,
-thought, and wisdom; whereas in the duties proper
-to the wife, the primary agent is will, affection, and love;
-and the wife from the latter principles performs her duties,
-and the man from the former performs his; wherefore their
-duties, from the nature of them, are diverse, but still conjunctive
-in a successive series. It is believed by many that
-women can perform the duties of men, if they were initiated
-therein like boys, at an early age. They may indeed be
-initiated into the exercise of such duties, but not into the
-judgment, on which the rectitude interiorly depends; wherefore
-those women who have been initiated into the duties
-of men, are bound, in matters of judgment, to consult men,
-and then, if they are left to their own disposal, they select
-from the counsels of men what favors their own particular
-love. It is also supposed by some, that women are equally<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_199"></a>[199]</span>
-capable with men of elevating the intellectual vision, and
-into the same sphere of life, and of viewing things in the
-same altitude; and they have been led into this opinion by
-the writings of certain learned authoresses; but these writings,
-when examined in the spiritual world, in the presence
-of the authoresses, were found to be the productions, not
-of judgment and wisdom, but of ingenuity and wit; and
-what proceeds from these two latter principles, on account
-of the elegance and neatness of style in which it is written,
-has the appearance of sublimity and erudition; yet only in
-the eyes of those who call all ingenuity by the name
-of wisdom. In like manner, men can not enter into the
-duties of women, and perform them aright, because they are
-not in the affections of women, which are altogether distinct
-from the affections of men. As the affections and perceptions
-of the male and female sex are thus distinct by creation,
-and consequently by nature, therefore, among the statutes
-given to the sons of Israel, this was also ordained: ‘A
-woman shall not put on the garment of a man, neither shall
-a man put on the garment of a woman; because this is an
-abomination.’ Deut. xxii. 5. The reason is, because all in
-the spiritual world are clothed according to their affections;
-and the affections of the woman and the man can not be
-united, except as subsisting between two, and in no case as
-subsisting in one.”—n. 175.</p>
-
-<p>The latter portion of the treatise on Conjugial Love is
-devoted to the melancholy subject of the disorders of the
-married life, to coldnesses and quarrels, separations and divorces;
-and finally to adulteries, fornications, and all the
-abuses of the sexual relations. Of this it would be out of
-place to speak here, except to remark, that it follows, as a
-consequence of the fact that conjugial love makes man’s
-highest bliss and purest heaven, that its violations and
-abuses must needs lead to the bitterest misery and deepest<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_200"></a>[200]</span>
-hell. This portion of the treatise has subjected Swedenborg
-to some gross calumny, which, if sincere, could only have
-arisen from a very superficial acquaintance with the principles
-of its author. And yet it is hardly possible for a man
-to write on such subjects, without provoking the censure of
-the sickly virtuous and the hypocritically pure. Religious
-people too generally treat the dire sexual evils which infest
-and corrupt society with silence and aversion; passing them
-by as the priest and the Levite did the wounded traveler.
-When the spirit of Jesus more fully actuates the church,
-and the love of the neighbor prompts to heal the world’s
-evils by all efficient means, then, we have no doubt, Swedenborg
-on Scortatory Love will be taken into council.</p>
-
-<p>We have used the term “conjugial,” after Swedenborg,
-who generally uses the Latin adjective <i>conjugialis</i>, in preference
-to <i>conjugalis</i>, perhaps because softer in sound.</p>
-
-<p>Interspersed between the various chapters of the treatise,
-are memorable relations of scenes which the author beheld
-in the spiritual world, and conversations which he had with
-spirits and angels on the subject of conjugial love. Many
-of these possess the most fascinating interest, and convey
-at the same time the most profound and beautiful truths.
-One interview which he had with two angels of the third
-heaven is so beautiful that we present it at length.</p>
-
-<p>“One morning I was looking upwards into heaven, and I
-saw over me three expanses, one above another. I wondered
-at first what all this meant; and presently there was heard
-from heaven a voice as of a trumpet, saying, ‘We have perceived,
-and now see, that thou art meditating concerning
-conjugial love. We are aware that no one on earth at
-present knows what true conjugial love is in its origin and
-essence. Yet it is of importance that it should be known.
-With us in the heavens, especially in the third heaven, our
-heavenly delights are principally derived from conjugial<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_201"></a>[201]</span>
-love; wherefore in consequence of leave granted us, we will
-send down to thee a conjugial pair for thy inspection and
-observation:’ and lo! instantly there appeared a chariot descending
-from the third or highest heaven; in which there
-was seen one angel; but as it approached there were seen
-therein two. The chariot, at a distance, glittered before my
-eyes like a diamond, and to it were harnessed young horses
-white as snow; and those who sat in the chariot held in their
-hands two turtle doves.... When they came nearer,
-lo! it was a husband and his wife; and they said, ‘We are
-a conjugial pair; we have lived blessed in heaven from the
-first age of the world, which is called by you the golden age,
-and during that time in the same perpetual flower of youth
-in which thou seest us at this day. I viewed each attentively,
-because I perceived that they represented conjugial
-love in its life and its adorning; in its life in their faces, and
-in its adorning in their raiment.... The husband
-appeared of a middle age between manhood and youth;
-from his eyes darted forth sparkling light derived from the
-wisdom of love; by virtue of which light his face was radiant
-from its inmost ground; and in consequence of such radiance,
-the skin had a kind of refulgence in the outermost
-surface, whereby his whole face was one resplendent comeliness.
-He was dressed in an upper robe which reached down
-to his feet, and underneath it was a vesture of hyacinthine
-blue, girded about with a golden girdle, upon which were
-three precious stones, two sapphires on the sides, and a carbuncle
-in the middle; his stockings were of bright shining
-linen, with threads of silver interwoven; and his shoes were
-of velvet: such was the representative form of conjugial love
-with the husband. But with the wife it was this; her face
-was seen by me, and it was not seen; it was seen as essential
-beauty, and it was not seen because this beauty was inexpressible;
-for in her face there was a splendor of flaming<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_202"></a>[202]</span>
-light, such as the angels of the third heaven enjoy, and this
-light made my sight dim; so that I was lost in astonishment:
-she, observing this, addressed me, saying, ‘What dost thou
-see?’ I replied, ‘I see nothing but conjugial love and the
-form thereof; but I see, and I do not see.’ Hereupon she
-turned herself obliquely from her husband; and then I was
-enabled to view her attentively. Her eyes were bright and
-sparkling from the light of her own heaven, which light, as
-was said, is of a flaming quality, which it derives from the
-love of wisdom; for in that heaven wives love their husbands
-from their wisdom and in their wisdom: and husbands love
-their wives from that love of wisdom and in it, as directed
-towards themselves; and thus they are united. This was
-the origin of her beauty; which was such that it would be
-impossible for any painter to imitate and exhibit it in its
-form, for he has no colors bright and vivid enough to express
-its lustre; nor is it in the power of his art to depict such
-beauty. Her hair was adjusted in becoming order so as to
-correspond with her beauty; and in it were inserted diadems
-of flowers: she had a necklace of carbuncles, from which
-hung a rosary of chrysolites; and she had bracelets of
-pearl: her upper robe was scarlet, and underneath it was a
-stomacher of purple, fastened in front with clasps of rubies.
-But what surprised me was, that the colors varied according
-to her aspect in regard to her husband, and also according
-thereto were sometimes more glittering, and sometimes less;
-in mutual aspect more, and in oblique aspect less. When I
-had made these observations, they again discoursed with me;
-and when the husband spoke, he spoke at the same time as
-from his wife; and when the wife spoke, she spoke at the
-same time as from her husband; such was the union of their
-minds from whence speech flows; and on this occasion I also
-heard the sound or tone of voice of conjugial love; inwardly
-it was simultaneous, and it likewise proceeded from the delights<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_203"></a>[203]</span>
-of a state of innocence and peace. At length they
-said, ‘We are recalled; we must depart:’ and instantly they
-appeared again conveyed in a chariot as before. The way
-by which they were conveyed was a paved way through
-flowering shrubberies, from the beds of which rose olive and
-orange trees laden with fruit. When they approached their
-own heaven they were met by several virgins, who welcomed
-and introduced them.”</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_204"></a>[204]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XXIII">CHAPTER XXIII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Attacked by Dr. Ekebom—Visits France—Letter to Hartley, and
-Hartley’s Opinion of Swedenborg.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>In the spring of 1769, Swedenborg published at Amsterdam,
-A Brief Exposition of the Doctrine of the New Church,
-“in which work,” he says, writing to Dr. Beyer, “are fully
-shown the errors of the existing doctrines of justification by
-faith alone, and of the imputation of the righteousness or
-merits of Jesus Christ.” He sent the little book to all the
-clergy throughout Holland, and to the most eminent in
-Germany; but, on second thought, sent only one copy to
-Sweden, to Dr. Beyer, requesting him to keep it to himself,
-for true divinity in Sweden was in a wintry state.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg’s long preservation from attack and controversy,
-at this time came to an end. On the 22d of March,
-1769, Dr. Ekebom, Dean of the Theological faculty of Gottenburg,
-laid before the Consistory there a series of objections
-against Swedenborg’s theological writings, laden with untruth,
-and full of personal invective. The Dean branded his doctrine
-“as in the highest degree heretical, and, on points the
-most tender to every Christian, Socinian.” He stated, further,
-that he “<i>did not know Assessor Swedenborg’s religious
-system, and should take no pains to come at the knowledge
-of it</i>.” As for Swedenborg’s chief works, he “<i>did not possess
-them, and had neither read nor seen them</i>.” Swedenborg’s
-written reply, transmitted from Holland, was mild and
-effectual. He cited his writings themselves, and proved<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_205"></a>[205]</span>
-that, according to Scripture, the Apostolic Creed, and whatever
-was not self-contradictory in the orthodoxy of the
-churches, his doctrine was anything but heretical. But the
-self-acknowledged ignorance and prejudice of the Dean were
-not to be removed by anything he might say. “Was not
-this,” to quote Swedenborg’s own words, “to be blind in the
-forehead, and to have eyes behind, and even those covered
-with a film? To see and decide upon writings in such a
-fashion, can any secular or ecclesiastical judge regard as
-otherwise than criminal?”</p>
-
-<p>About the end of May, or the beginning of June, Swedenborg
-left Amsterdam for Paris, “with a design which,” in
-writing to Dr. Beyer, he says, “must not be made public
-beforehand.” We hardly understand the remark, except
-that he anticipated some difficulty with regard to the object
-of his journey,—the publication of another little work,
-entitled, “The Intercourse Between the Soul and the Body,”
-in the French capital.</p>
-
-<p>On his arrival in Paris, Swedenborg submitted his tract
-to M. Chevreuil, Censor Royal, who, having read it, informed
-him that a tacit permission to publish would be granted, on
-condition, as was customary in the case of doubtful books,
-that the title should say, “printed at London,” or “at
-Amsterdam.” This, Swedenborg’s nice sense of truth and
-honor could not submit to, and he abandoned his intention
-of publishing it in Paris. His enemies in Gottenburg then
-circulated a report that he had been ordered to quit Paris,
-which he, in a letter to Dr. Beyer, pronounced a direct
-falsehood, and appealed for the truth of the case to the
-Swedish Ambassador to France.</p>
-
-<p>“Rumor also,” writes Wilkinson, “has been busy with
-Swedenborg upon this journey. The French ‘Universal
-Biography’ connects him with an artist,—Elie,—who, it is
-alleged, supplied him with money, and furthered his presumed<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_206"></a>[206]</span>
-designs. Indeed, he has been accused of a league
-with the <i>illuminés</i>, and with a certain politico-theological
-freemasonry, centuries old, but always invisible, which was
-to overturn society, and foster revolutions all over the world.
-We can only say that our researches have not elicited these
-particulars, and that every authentic document shows that
-Swedenborg stood always upon his own basis, accepted
-money from no one, and was just what he appeared—a
-theological missionary, and nothing more.”</p>
-
-<p>The short visit to Paris was terminated by his departure
-for London, where, unfettered by censors, he published his
-little book—“The Intercourse Between the Soul and the
-Body.”</p>
-
-<p>One of Swedenborg’s warmest and most intelligent English
-friends, was the Rev. Thomas Hartley, A. M., rector
-of Winwick, Northamptonshire,—himself an author, and
-assistant translator of the first English edition of “Heaven
-and Hell.” At this time he wrote to Swedenborg, fearing
-that he might be in want of money, and offering to supply
-his needs; also requesting an account of his past life and
-connections, as a means of refuting calumnies. In his reply,
-Swedenborg satisfied him on these points. He says to Mr.
-Hartley: “I take pleasure in the friendship you express for
-me in your letter, and return you sincere thanks for the same:
-but as to the praises you bestow upon me, I only receive
-them as tokens of your love of the truths contained in my
-writings, and so refer them to the Lord and Saviour, from
-whom is all truth, because he is the Truth. John xiv. 6.</p>
-
-<p>“I live on terms of familiarity and friendship with all the
-bishops of my country, who are ten in number; as also with
-the sixteen senators, and the rest of the nobility; for they
-know that I am in fellowship with angels. The King and
-Queen also, and the three princes, their sons, show me much
-favor. I was once invited by the King and Queen to dine<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_207"></a>[207]</span>
-at their table,—an honor which is, in general, granted only
-to the nobility of the highest rank; and likewise, since, with
-the hereditary Prince. They all wished for my return
-home,—so far am I from being in any danger of persecution
-in my own country, as you seem to apprehend, and so kindly
-wish to provide against; and should anything of the kind
-befall me elsewhere, it can not hurt me. But I regard all
-that I have mentioned as matters of little moment; for,
-what far exceeds them, I have been called to a holy office
-by the Lord himself, who most graciously manifested himself
-in person to me, his servant, in the year 1743; when he
-opened my sight to the view of the spiritual world, and
-granted me the privilege of conversing with spirits and
-angels, which I enjoy to this day. I am a Fellow, by
-invitation, of the Royal Academy of Sciences at Stockholm:
-but I have never sought admission into any other Literary
-Society, as I belong to an angelic society, wherein things
-relating to heaven and the soul are the only subjects of discourse
-and entertainment; whereas the things which occupy
-the attention of our Literary Societies are such as relate to
-the world and the body. As for the world’s wealth, I have
-what is sufficient, and more I neither seek nor wish for.
-Your letter has drawn the mention of these things from me,
-with the view, as you suggest, that any ill-grounded prejudices
-may be removed. Farewell! and from my heart I
-wish you all felicity in this world and in the next; which I
-make no doubt of your attaining, if you look and pray to
-our Lord.—E. Swedenborg.” Dated, London, 1769.</p>
-
-<p>Mr. Hartley, in 1781, when far advanced in years, thus
-gives his opinion of Swedenborg:—</p>
-
-<p>“The great Swedenborg was a man of uncommon humility.
-He was of a catholic spirit, and loved all good men of every
-church, making at the same time all candid allowance for
-the innocence of involuntary error. However self-denying<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_208"></a>[208]</span>
-in his own person, as to gratifications and indulgences, even
-within the bounds of moderation, yet nothing severe, nothing
-of the precisian, appeared in him; but on the contrary, an
-inward serenity and complacency of mind were manifest in
-the sweetness of his looks and outward demeanor. It may
-reasonably be supposed that I have weighed the character
-of our illustrious author in the scale of my best judgment,
-from the personal knowledge I had of him, from the best
-information I could procure respecting him, and from a
-diligent perusal of his writings; and according thereto, I
-have found him to be the sound divine, the good man, the
-deep philosopher, the universal scholar, and the polite gentleman;
-and I further believe, that he had a high degree
-of illumination from the spirit of God, was commissioned by
-Him as an extraordinary messenger to the world, and had
-communication with angels and the spiritual world far
-beyond any since the time of the Apostles. As such, I offer
-his character to the world, solemnly declaring, that, to the
-best of my knowledge, I am not herein led by any partiality
-or private views whatever, being now dead to every worldly
-interest, and accounting myself as unworthy of any higher
-character than that of a penitent sinner.”</p>
-
-<p>Two others of Swedenborg’s English friends were Dr.
-Messiter and Dr. Hampé, who had been preceptor to George
-I. From a letter of Dr. Messiter’s, we extract the following
-remarks on Swedenborg’s character:—</p>
-
-<p>“I have had the honor of being frequently admitted to
-Swedenborg’s company, when in London, and to converse
-with him on various points of learning, and I will venture
-to affirm that there are no parts of mathematical, philosophical,
-or medical knowledge, nay, I believe I might justly
-say, of human literature, to which he is in the least a
-stranger; yet so totally insensible is he of his own merit,
-that I am confident he does not know that he has any; and<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_209"></a>[209]</span>
-as he himself somewhere says of the angels, he always turns
-his head away on the slightest encomium.”</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg’s stay in England at this time does not seem
-to have been longer than sufficed for the transaction of his
-business; for in September, 1769, he sailed for Stockholm,
-arriving there at the beginning of October. But we must
-now suspend the narrative of his life to offer a few remarks
-on his little works,—“A Brief Exposition of the Doctrine
-of the New Church,” and “The Intercourse Between the
-Soul and the Body.”</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_210"></a>[210]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XXIV">CHAPTER XXIV.</h2>
-
-<p><i>“Brief Exposition of the Doctrines of the New Church,” and “The
-Intercourse between the Soul and the Body.”</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>“The Brief Exposition of the Doctrines of the New
-Church” is an exposition effected by means of comparisons
-between the doctrines of the New Church and those of Catholics
-and Protestants. The work is avowedly only a
-sketch, and the precursor of a larger book—“The True
-Christian Religion”—a work of some years, which will
-shortly demand our attention. The Catholic doctrinals are
-taken from the records of the Council of Trent; and the
-Protestant from the Formula Concordiæ, composed by persons
-attached to the Augsburg Confession. The disagreements
-between the tenets of the Old and New Churches are
-considered under twenty-five Articles, the heads of which we
-will condense and present to the reader.</p>
-
-<p>The Churches which, by the Reformation, separated themselves
-from the Roman Catholic Church, differ in various
-points of doctrine; but they all agree in the Articles concerning
-a Trinity of Persons in the Godhead, original sin
-from Adam, imputation of the merit of Christ, and justification
-by faith alone. The Roman Catholics, before the Reformation,
-held and taught exactly the same things as the
-Reformed did after it, in respect to these points; only with
-this difference, that they conjoined faith with charity or good
-works.</p>
-
-<p>The leading Reformers, Luther, Melancthon, and Calvin,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_211"></a>[211]</span>
-retained all the tenets concerning a Trinity of Persons in
-the Godhead, original sin, imputation of the merits of
-Christ, and justification by faith, just as they were, and had
-been, among the Roman Catholics; but they separated charity
-or good works from that faith, and declared at the same
-time that they were not of a saving efficacy, with a view to
-be totally severed from the Roman Catholics as to the very
-essentials of the Church, which are faith and charity. Nevertheless
-the leading Reformers adjoined good works, and even
-conjoined them to their faith, but in man as a passive subject;
-whereas the Roman Catholics conjoin them in man as
-an active subject; and notwithstanding this, there is actually
-a conformity between the one and the other as to faith, works,
-and merit.</p>
-
-<p>The whole system of theology in the Christian World, at
-this day, is founded on an idea of three Gods, arising from
-the doctrine of a Trinity of Persons, and when this doctrine
-is rejected, then all the tenets of the aforesaid theology fall
-to pieces. The truth of this must be apparent to every
-one. The Doctrine of a Trinity of Persons in the Divine
-Being, is the key-stone of Roman Catholic and Protestant
-theology. If this Doctrine be false, the whole structure totters
-to its fall.</p>
-
-<p>When the faith in three Gods is rejected, then it is possible
-to receive the true and saving faith, which is a faith in
-One God, united with good works.</p>
-
-<p>This faith is in God the Saviour Jesus Christ, and in its
-simple form is as follows: 1. That there is One God, in whom
-is a Divine Trinity, and that He is the Lord Jesus Christ.
-2. That saving faith is to believe in Him. 3. That evils
-ought to be shunned, because they are of the devil and from
-the devil. 4. That good works ought to be done, because
-they are of God and from God. 5. That they ought to be<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_212"></a>[212]</span>
-done by man as of himself, but with a belief that they are
-from the Lord, operating in him and by him.</p>
-
-<p>The faith of the present day has separated religion from
-the Church, since religion consists in the acknowledgment
-of One God, and in the worship of Him from faith grounded
-in charity; but the faith of the present Church cannot be
-conjoined with charity, and produce any fruits which are
-good works, because imputation supplies everything, remits
-guilt, justifies, sanctifies, regenerates; imparts the life of
-heaven, and thus salvation; and all this freely, without any
-works of man. In this case, what is charity, which ought
-to be united with faith, but something vain and superfluous,
-and a mere addition and supplement to imputation,
-and justification, to which, nevertheless, it adds no weight or
-value?</p>
-
-<p>From this faith results a worship of the mouth and not
-of the life. Now the Lord accepts the worship of the
-mouth in proportion as it proceeds from the worship of the
-life.</p>
-
-<p>The doctrine of the present Church is interwoven with
-many paradoxes, which are to be embraced by faith. Therefore
-its tenets gain admission into the memory only, and not
-at all into the understanding, which is superior to the
-memory, but merely into confirmations below it. Thus the
-tenets of the present Church cannot be learned or retained
-without great difficulty, nor can they be preached or taught
-without using great care and caution to conceal their nakedness,
-because sound reason neither discerns nor perceives
-them.</p>
-
-<p>The doctrine of the faith of the present Church ascribes
-to God human passions and infirmities; as, that He beheld
-man from anger, that He required to be reconciled, that He
-is reconciled through the love He bore towards the Son, and
-by His intercession; and that He required to be appeased<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_213"></a>[213]</span>
-by the sight of His Son’s sufferings, and thus to be brought
-back to mercy; and that He imputes the righteousness of
-His Son to an unrighteous man who supplicates it from
-faith alone; and that thus from an enemy He makes him a
-friend, and from a child of wrath a child of grace:—all
-which dogmas are the opposite of the truth, and repulsive to
-every wise man.</p>
-
-<p>The faith of the present Church has produced monstrous
-births; for instance, instantaneous salvation by an immediate
-act of mercy; predestination; the notion that God has
-no respect unto the actions of men, but unto faith alone;
-that there is no connection between charity and faith; that
-man in conversion is like a stock; with many more heresies
-of the same kind; likewise concerning the sacraments of
-Baptism and the Holy Supper, as to the advantages reasonably
-to be expected from them, when considered according
-to the doctrine of justification by faith alone; as also with
-regard to the person of Christ: and that heresies, from the
-first ages to the present day, have sprung up from no other
-source than from the doctrine founded on the idea of three
-Divine Persons or Gods.</p>
-
-<p>The last state of the present church, when it is at an end,
-is meant by the consummation of the age, and the coming
-of the Lord at that period. Matt. xxiv. 3.</p>
-
-<p>The infestation from falses, and thence the consummation
-of every truth, or the desolation which at this day prevails
-in the Christian Churches, is meant by the great affliction,
-such as was not from the beginning of the world, nor ever
-shall be: Matt. xxiv. 21: and that there would be neither
-love nor faith, nor the knowledge of good and truth, in the
-last time of the Christian Church, is understood by these
-words in the same chapter of Matthew: “After the affliction
-of those days, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_214"></a>[214]</span>
-not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and
-the powers of the heavens shall be shaken,” verse 29.</p>
-
-<p>They who are in the present justifying faith, are meant
-by the he-goats in Daniel and Matthew; and they who have
-confirmed themselves therein, are meant in the Apocalypse
-by the dragon and his two beasts, and by the locusts; and
-this same faith, when confirmed, is there meant by the great
-city which is spiritually called Sodom and Egypt, where the
-two witnesses were slain; as also by the pit of the abyss,
-whence the locusts issued.</p>
-
-<p>Unless a New Church be established by the Lord, no one
-can be saved. This is meant by these words: “Unless those
-days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved.”
-Matt. xxiv. 22. The reason why no flesh could be saved,
-unless those days should be shortened, is, because the faith
-of the present Church is founded on the idea of three Gods,
-and with this idea no one can enter heaven. Not that all
-who are believers in the doctrine of a tripersonal God are
-lost; but that, unless a New Church were provided by the
-Lord, and spiritual truth revealed, man, wanting truth,
-could never become regenerate, could never enter heaven,
-and thus the end of his creation would be defeated. In
-spite, however, of false doctrine, men are saved by the laying
-hold, as it were, of the truths leading to a good life, which
-exist in the most corrupt faiths, and goodness always contains
-an internal acknowledgment and love of truth, although
-false doctrine may fill the memory. Yet it is true, nevertheless,
-that false doctrine perverts, discourages, and in the
-end destroys all inclinations to live well. For this reason,
-then, the First Christian Church has come to its end, or has
-been consummated; and the Lord is raising up a New
-Church, endowed with truth capable of leading the world in
-the way of life, and to heaven.</p>
-
-<p>The opening and rejection of the tenets of the faith of the<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_215"></a>[215]</span>
-present Church, and the revelation and reception of the
-tenets of the faith of the New Church, is meant by these
-words in the Apocalypse:—“He that sat upon the throne
-said, Behold I make all things new; and He said unto me,
-Write; for these words are true and faithful.” xxi. 5. The
-New Church about to be established by the Lord, is the
-New Jerusalem, treated of in chapters xxi. and xxii., which
-is there called the Bride and the Wife of the Lamb.</p>
-
-<p>Such, briefly expressed, are the heads or leading ideas
-of the little work, “A Brief Exposition of the Doctrines
-of the New Church,” a treatise which, as Wilkinson truly
-remarks, “is unequaled among Swedenborg’s works for its
-destructive logic.”</p>
-
-<p>“The Intercourse Between the Soul and the Body,” is a
-small treatise designed to illustrate a subject which has
-puzzled many minds from time immemorial. Various have
-been the theories of philosophers on this subject; but few
-could satisfy the intelligent mind, or explain the varied
-phenomena of being. Swedenborg, in many of his previous
-works, had, with greater or less fullness, explained the nature
-of the soul’s union with the body, and this treatise is, to some
-extent, but a repetition of what he had elsewhere written,—cleared,
-however, from extraneous matter.</p>
-
-<p>His view of the subject is simple and intelligible, as is all
-truth. The soul of man is a spiritual substance, of the same
-form as his body; transfusing all the body’s tissues, and
-wearing the body as a garment, even as the body wears its
-clothes. The body lives from the soul. In itself, the body
-is dead and without sensation, as is evident when the man
-leaves it at death; it then returns to its inorganic elements.
-As the body is diseased or injured, the soul is more or less
-deprived of its power of action in the natural world, but the
-soul itself is uninjured. We see an illustration of this in
-the use of spectacles. Man’s external organ of sight is<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_216"></a>[216]</span>
-defective, and he cannot see objects distinctly. Glasses are
-put before his eyes, and he sees as well as ever. Now it is
-certain the glasses in themselves do not restore his sight.
-They merely complete the defective organ, and the eye
-of the spiritual man uses them as a means to look forth into
-the material world. Observation and meditation will supply
-a multitude of confirmations of this doctrine of the spiritual
-body animating and transfusing the material.</p>
-
-<p>At death the spiritual body lays down the material, and
-makes its appearance in its higher sphere. Whether it is
-beautiful or deformed, depends upon the man’s conduct on
-earth. If the soul has loved goodness and truth, it is a
-beautiful human form, and increases in grace and loveliness
-to eternity in heaven; if, on the other hand, it has lived in
-evil and hated truth, it is deformed and hideous, and finds
-its place in hell, the abode of all that is ugly and abominable.</p>
-
-<p>But from this it is not to be concluded that the soul has
-life in itself. Like the body, it also is dead, and is only a
-form receptive of life from the One Only Infinite Life, in
-whom the whole universe lives, moves, and has its being,—the
-Lord. The material body is proximately sustained by
-the light and heat of the material sun. The spiritual body
-of man is sustained by the light and heat of the spiritual
-Sun, which is the circumambient sphere of the Divine Love
-and Wisdom. From this spiritual Sun, our natural sun
-exists, even as our material bodies live from our spiritual
-bodies. But all alike exist and subsist from the Lord
-alone.</p>
-
-<p>Such, in a few words, is the leading idea of this little treatise.
-For the details, the charming confirmation and the
-able and simple refutation of the doctrines of Leibnitz and
-other philosophers, who have treated on the same subject, we
-can only refer to the book itself. We append the concluding<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_217"></a>[217]</span>
-paragraph of the treatise, as a delightful specimen of spiritual
-analogy:—</p>
-
-<div class="blockquote">
-
-<p>“I was once asked, how I, who was previously a philosopher,
-became a theologian; and I answered, ‘In the same
-manner that fishermen became the disciples and apostles of
-the Lord: and that I also from my youth had been a spiritual
-fisherman.’ On this, he asked, ‘What is a spiritual fisherman?’
-I replied,—‘A fisherman, in the spiritual sense of
-the Word, signifies a man who investigates and teaches natural
-truths, and afterwards spiritual truths in a rational
-manner.’ On his inquiring, ‘How is this demonstrated?’ I
-said, ‘From these passages of the Word: ‘And the waters
-shall fail from the sea, and the rivers shall be wasted and
-dried up. The fishers also shall mourn, and all they that
-cast a hook into the brook shall lament.’ Isaiah xix. 5, 8.
-And in another place it is said, respecting the sea, whose
-waters were healed, ‘The fishers shall stand upon it, from
-Engedi even unto Eneglaim; they shall be present to spread
-forth nets; their fish shall be according to their kinds, as the
-fish of the great sea, exceeding many.’ Ezekiel xlvii. 10.
-And in another place, ‘Behold I will send for many fishers,
-saith Jehovah, and they shall fish them.’ Jeremiah xvi. 16.
-Hence it is evident why the Lord chose fishermen for his
-disciples, and said, ‘Follow me, and I will make you fishers
-of men;’ Matthew iv. 18, 19; Mark i. 16, 17; and why
-he said to Peter after he had caught a multitude of fishes,
-‘Henceforth thou shalt catch men.’ Luke v. 9, 10. I afterwards
-demonstrated the origin of this signification of
-fishermen from the Apocalypse Revealed; namely, that
-since water signifies natural truths, as does also a river, a
-fish signifies those who are in possession of natural truths;
-and thence fishermen, those who investigate and teach truth.
-On hearing this, my interrogator said, ‘Now I can understand
-why the Lord called and chose fishermen to be his<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_218"></a>[218]</span>
-disciples; and therefore I do not wonder that he has also
-chosen you, since, as you have observed, you were from early
-youth a fisherman in a spiritual sense, that is, an investigator
-of natural truths; and the reason that you are now become
-an investigator of spiritual truths, is because they are
-founded in the former.’ To this he added, being a man of
-reason, that ‘the Lord alone knows who is the proper person
-to apprehend and teach the truths of His New Church,
-whether one of the primates, or one of their domestic servants.
-Besides,’ he continued, ‘what Christian theologian
-does not study philosophy in the schools, before he is inaugurated
-a theologian.’ At length he said, ‘Since you are
-become a theologian, explain what is your theology.’ I answered,
-‘These are its two principles, <i>God is one, and there is
-a conjunction of charity and faith</i>.’ To which he replied,
-‘Who denies these principles?’ I rejoined, ‘The theology
-of the present day, when interiorly examined.’”</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_219"></a>[219]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XXV">CHAPTER XXV.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Persecution—Letter to the Academy of Sciences—Leaves Stockholm
-for the last time.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>On Swedenborg’s arrival in Stockholm, he found that the
-long peace he had enjoyed from external interference and
-persecution was at an end. The first manifestation of hostility
-took place in the seizure of some copies of his treatise
-on Conjugial Love, at Norkjoping, which he had sent from
-England, intending to present them to his countrymen. The
-ground of their seizure was, a law prohibiting the introduction
-of any works into Sweden at variance with the Lutheran
-faith. The seizure having taken place in the diocese of
-his nephew Filenius, he naturally turned to him for explanation
-and redress. Filenius thereon embraced and kissed
-his uncle, and assured him that he would fulfill all his desires,
-and procure the restoration of his books. But his actions
-were the reverse of his words; for he was, in fact, the
-prompter of the seizure, and secretly did all he could to insure
-their confiscation. By and by Swedenborg discovered
-the hypocrisy, and remonstrated with Filenius; whereupon
-he dropped the mask, and insisted on the books undergoing
-clerical revision before they could be surrendered. Swedenborg
-urged that as his treatise was not theological, but chiefly
-moral, its revisal by the clergy was absurd, and that such
-censorship would pave the way for a dark age in Sweden.
-But Filenius was unmoved; and Swedenborg, now fully
-convinced of his double dealing, likened him, as he well<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_220"></a>[220]</span>
-might, to Judas Iscariot, and said that “he who spoke lies,
-lied also in his life.” Having brought some copies of his
-treatise on Conjugial Love with him to Sweden, he presented
-them to many of the Senators, the Bishops, and the royal
-family. He had no fear of the result of free and open
-criticism. But worse things lay in store. Dean Ekebom,
-of Gottenburg, was indignant that Doctors Beyer and Rosen
-should have embraced Swedenborg’s views, and the clerical
-deputies from that town were instructed to complain of Swedenborg
-and his disciples to the Diet. They found in bishop
-Filenius, then President of the House of Clergy, a willing
-instrument to further their designs. They plotted to have
-Swedenborg put upon his trial, presuming that when questioned
-he would openly assert his divine commission and
-powers of spiritual intercourse, and then they would pronounce
-him insane, and have him committed to a mad-house.
-Count Hopken revealed to Swedenborg this cunning device
-of his enemies, and advised him to fly the kingdom. At
-this news, Swedenborg was much afflicted; and going into
-his garden, he fell on his knees, and prayed to the Lord to
-direct him what to do. After this prayer, he received the
-consolatory answer that <i>no evil should touch him</i>. And so it
-turned out. His inoffensive bearing, his rank and connections,
-all tended to intimidate his adversaries, and prevent
-the execution of their designed outrage. Had he been a
-farmer’s or a tradesman’s son, instead of being a bishop’s,
-his fate might have been very different.</p>
-
-<p>Bishop Filenius, however, succeeded in gaining the appointment
-of a committee of the House of Clergy on the
-Swedenborgian case. Its deliberations were kept secret.
-Nothing came of it that was unfavorable to Swedenborg.
-They disregarded the charges of Filenius, and spoke “very
-handsomely and reasonably of Swedenborg.”</p>
-
-<p>Filenius gained one point, however, in the presentation of<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_221"></a>[221]</span>
-a memorial to the king, requesting the attention of the
-Chancellor of Justice to the troubles at Gottenburg. To
-this request the king yielded; and the members of the Consistory
-of Gottenburg were commanded to send in an unequivocal
-representation of the light in which they regarded
-Swedenborg’s principles. On January 2d, 1770, Dr. Beyer,
-as one of the members of the Consistory, rose, and gave his
-bold and honest testimony in favor of Swedenborg and his
-writings. He said: “Convinced by experience, I must in
-the first place observe, that no man is competent to give a
-just and suitable judgment on those writings, who has not
-read them; or who has read them superficially, or with a determination
-in his heart to reject them, after having perused,
-without examination, some detached parts only; neither is
-he competent, who rejects them as soon as he finds anything
-that militates against those doctrines which he has long
-cherished and acknowledged as true, and of which perhaps
-he is but too blindly enamored; nor is he competent, who
-is an ardent, yet undiscriminating biblical scholar, who, in
-explaining the meaning of the Scriptures, confines his ideas
-to the literal expression or signification only: and, lastly,
-neither is he competent, who has altogether devoted himself
-to sensual indulgences, and the love of the world.” He
-then entered into the details of New Church doctrine, and
-concluded in these words: “In obedience, therefore, to your
-Majesty’s most gracious command, that I should deliver a
-full and positive declaration respecting the writings of Swedenborg,
-I do acknowledge it to be my duty to declare, in
-all humble confidence, that as far as I have proceeded in the
-study of them, and agreeably to the gift granted to me for
-investigation and judgment, I have found in them <i>nothing
-but what closely coincides with the words of the Lord
-himself, and that they shine with a light truly divine</i>.” These<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_222"></a>[222]</span>
-were noble and brave words to speak in the midst of enemies.</p>
-
-<p>The debate on his doctrines dragged its slow length along.
-His enemies, full of spite, were yet full of fear, and seemed
-to dread the result of an open attack upon Swedenborg.
-Still the petty persecution continued, until, at last, May 10th,
-1770, Swedenborg took up his pen and addressed himself
-directly to the king. In this letter, he complains that he
-had met with usage the like of which had been offered to
-none since the establishment of Christianity in Sweden, and
-much less since there had existed liberty of conscience. He
-recapitulated his grievances. He said that he had been
-attacked, calumniated, and menaced, without the opportunity
-of defending himself; though truth itself had answered for
-him. He reminded his Majesty of their former interview.
-With great simplicity, he says: “I have already informed
-your Majesty, and beseech you to call it to mind, that the
-Lord our Saviour manifested himself to me in a sensible
-personal appearance; that he has commanded me to write
-what has been already written, and what I have still to
-write; that He was afterwards graciously pleased to endow
-me with the privilege of conversing with angels and spirits,
-and of being in fellowship with them. I have already declared
-this more than once to your Majesty in the presence
-of all the royal family, when they were graciously pleased
-to invite me to their table, with five senators, and several
-other persons; this was the only subject discoursed of during
-the repast. Of this I also spoke afterwards to several other
-senators; and more openly to their Excellencies Count de
-Tessin, Count Bonde, and Count Hopken, who are still
-alive, and were satisfied with the truth of it. I have declared
-the same in England, Holland, Germany, Denmark,
-and at Paris, to kings, princes, and other particular persons,
-as well as to those in this kingdom. If the common report<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_223"></a>[223]</span>
-is to be believed, the Chancellor has declared that what I
-have been reciting are untruths, although the very truth.
-To say that they cannot believe and give credit to such
-things, therein will I excuse them; for it is not in my power
-to place others in the same state in which God has placed
-me, so as to be able to convince them, by their own eyes and
-ears of the truth of those deeds and things I publicly have
-made known. I have no ability to capacitate them to converse
-with angels and spirits, neither to work miracles to
-dispose or force their understandings to comprehend what I
-say. When my writings are read with attention and cool
-reflection, (in which many things are to be met with, heretofore
-unknown,) it is easy enough to conclude, that I could
-not come to such a knowledge but by a real vision, and by
-conversing with those who are in the spiritual world. This
-knowledge is given to me from our Saviour, not for any
-private merit of mine, but for the great concern of all
-Christians’ salvation and happiness; and as such, how can
-any one venture to assert that it is false? That these things
-may appear such as many have had no conception of, and
-which, of consequence, they can not easily credit, has nothing
-remarkable in it, for scarcely anything is known respecting
-them.” He concluded by throwing himself upon the king’s
-protection, and requesting him to command for himself the
-opinion of the clergy on the case; also the production of
-various documents that had been produced at Gottenburg
-and elsewhere; in order that he, and those maligned together
-with him, might be heard in their defence, this being their
-right and privilege. He protested, that the only advice he
-had given to Doctors Beyer and Rosen, was to address
-themselves to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, as a means
-to heavenly good and blessedness; for He only has all power
-in heaven and on earth. Matthew xxviii. 18. Were this
-doctrine of the Supreme Divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_224"></a>[224]</span>
-taken away, he averred that he would rather live in Tartary
-than in Christendom.</p>
-
-<p>Had the Consistory declared this doctrine heretical, it
-must have led to many strange issues. But the Consistory
-came to no decision, and their report on Swedenborg’s writings
-was never written. A short time before Swedenborg
-left Stockholm for the last time, the king said to him: “The
-Consistory has been silent on my letters and your works;”
-and, putting his hand on Swedenborg’s shoulder, he added,
-“We may conclude that they have found nothing reprehensible
-in them, and that you have written in conformity to
-the truth.”</p>
-
-<p>Throughout all this affair, Swedenborg remained perfectly
-calm; and, though a very old man, worked on as industriously
-as ever. It might seem, from what has been said,
-that the controversy had terminated entirely in his favor.
-But it was not so, as he, in the following year, 1771, found
-out; for then it appeared that his adversaries had succeeded
-in obtaining a strict prohibition against the importation
-of his writings into Sweden. It was his intention to send in
-a formal complaint to the States General, appealing against
-this prohibition; but it does not appear whether he fulfilled
-his intention, or not.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, he addressed a letter to the Universities of Upsal,
-Lund, and Abo, asserting that each of the estates of the
-kingdom ought to have its own Consistory, and ought not to
-acknowledge the exclusive authority of that of Gottenburg.
-He declared that religious matters belong to others as well
-as the priests. Thus ends our account of this affair. It
-may be said to be the only thing approaching to persecution
-that Swedenborg endured; and considering the many heterodox
-opinions that he broached, we can not but think that he
-had, on the whole, but little to complain of. Many who
-have followed him in the propagation of the new theology,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_225"></a>[225]</span>
-have not gone so far, yet have fared worse. The gentleness
-and simple prudence which, during so many years, shielded
-him from interference, we can not too highly admire. But,
-above all, we must be struck with the remarkable providence
-of the Lord, shown in his protection: the Divine promise
-was truly kept, that he <i>should not be harmed</i>.</p>
-
-<p>His old associates of the Royal Academy of Sciences at
-Stockholm, received, at this time, his last communication.
-He wrote them a letter explaining some of the correspondences
-of Scripture, and their origin. In it, he says: “The
-science of correspondences was esteemed, by the ancients,
-the science of sciences, and constituted their wisdom; it
-would surely be of importance for some one of your society
-to devote his attention to it. Should it be desired, I am
-willing to unfold the meaning of the Egyptian hieroglyphics,
-which are nothing else but correspondences; these being
-discovered and proved from the Word, in the Apocalypse
-Revealed; and to publish their explications, is a work which
-no other person could accomplish.” We have no record as
-to how the Academy received this proposal. A copy of this
-letter was sent to Mr. Hartley, and Swedenborg desired that
-he and his friends would think over the subject. The letter
-is now published as an appendix to his treatise on the White
-Horse.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg now prepared to leave Stockholm for another
-journey. Writing under date of July 23d, 1770, to Dr.
-Beyer, he says: “As I am going, in a few days, to Amsterdam,
-I shall take my leave of you in this letter, hoping that
-our Saviour will support you in good health, preserve you
-from further violence, and bless your thoughts.”</p>
-
-<p>Robsahm tells us that, on the day that Swedenborg
-departed, he called on him, and “I then asked him,” says
-he, “if we should meet again. He answered me in a tender
-and touching manner: ‘I do not know whether I shall<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_226"></a>[226]</span>
-return; but I am assured I shall not die before I have
-finished the publication of the book entitled the True Christian
-Religion; and for which only I am now about to depart.
-But should we not see one another again in this lower world,
-we shall meet in the presence of the Lord our Heavenly
-Father, if so be that we observe to do his commandments.’
-He then took a cheerful leave, and started on his last
-journey, with the apparent vigor of a man of thirty years
-of age, although he was then eighty-two. He took ship for
-Amsterdam, leaving his native land, never again, in the
-body, to return.”</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_227"></a>[227]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XXVI">CHAPTER XXVI.</h2>
-
-<p><i>Swedenborg in intercourse with General Tuxen and Paulus ab Indagine—His
-reply to Dr. Ernesti—Letter to the Landgrave of Hesse
-Darmstadt.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>On the voyage to Amsterdam, the ship that carried Swedenborg
-being detained, by adverse winds, off Elsinore,
-General Tuxen, hearing that Swedenborg was in the offing,
-determined to improve the opportunity; and, taking a boat,
-went off to see him. Introduced by the captain into the
-cabin, he found Swedenborg seated in an undress,—his elbows
-on the table, and his hands supporting his face, which
-was turned towards the door,—his eyes open and much elevated.
-The General at once addressed him. At this, he
-recovered himself, (for he had been in a state of vision,)
-rose with some confusion, advanced a few steps in visible
-uncertainty, and then bade him welcome, asking whence he
-came. Tuxen replied that he had come with an invitation
-from his wife and himself, to request him to favor them with
-his company at their house; to which he immediately consented,
-and dressed himself alertly. The General’s wife, who
-was indisposed, received him in the house, and requested his
-excuse if in any respect she should fall short of her wishes
-to entertain him: adding that for thirty years she had been
-afflicted with a painful disease. Swedenborg politely kissed
-her hand, and answered, “Let us not speak of this; only
-acquiesce in the will of God, and it will pass away, and you
-will return to the same health and beauty as when you were<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_228"></a>[228]</span>
-fifteen years old.” The lady made some reply, to which he
-rejoined, “Yes, in a few weeks.” From which they concluded
-him to mean that diseases which have their foundation in the
-mind, and are supported by infirmities of the body, do not
-disappear immediately after death.</p>
-
-<p>“Being then together,” says Tuxen, “in company with
-my wife, my now deceased daughter, and three or four young
-ladies, my relations, he entertained them very politely, and
-with much attention, on indifferent subjects, on favourite
-dogs and cats that were in the room, which caressed him,
-and jumped on his knee, showing their little tricks. During
-these trifling discourses,—mixed with singular questions,
-all of which he obligingly answered, whether they concerned
-this or the other world,—I took occasion to say that I was
-sorry I had no better company to amuse him than a sickly
-wife and her young girls: he replied, ‘And is not this very
-good company? I was always very partial to ladies’ society.’
-After some little pause, he cast his eyes on a harpsichord,
-and asked whether we were lovers of music, and who
-played upon it. I told him we were all lovers of it, and
-that my wife in her youth had practiced, as she had a fine
-voice, perhaps better than any in Denmark, as several persons
-of distinction, who had heard the best singers in France,
-England, and Italy, had assured her; and that my daughter
-also played with pretty good taste. On this Swedenborg
-desired her to play. She then performed a difficult and celebrated
-sonata, to which he beat the measure with his foot
-on the sofa on which he sat; and when finished, he said,
-‘Bravo! very fine.’ She then played another by Rutini;
-and when she had played a few minutes, he said, ‘This is by
-an Italian, but the first was not.’ This finished, he said,
-‘Bravo! you play very well. Do you not also sing?’ She
-answered, ‘I sing, but have not a very good voice, though
-fond of singing, and would sing if my mother would accompany<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_229"></a>[229]</span>
-me.’ He requested my wife to join, to which she
-assented, and they sang a few Italian duettos, and some
-French airs, each in her respective taste, to which he beat
-time, and afterwards paid many compliments to my wife, on
-account of her taste and fine voice, which she had preserved
-notwithstanding so long an illness. I took the liberty of
-saying to him, that since in his writings he always declared
-that at all times there were good and evil spirits of the other
-world present with man; might I then be bold to ask,
-whether now, while my wife and daughter were singing, there
-had been any from the other world present with us? To
-this he answered, ‘Yes, certainly;’ and on my inquiring who
-they were, and whether I had known them, he said it was
-the Danish royal family, and he mentioned Christian VI.,
-Sophia Magdalena, and Frederick V., who, through his eyes,
-had seen and heard it. I do not positively recollect whether
-he also mentioned the late beloved Queen Louisa among
-them. After this he retired.”</p>
-
-<p>During this visit to General Tuxen, in the course of other
-conversation, Tuxen produced an autobiographical letter
-which Swedenborg had written to Hartley, and which began,
-“I was born in the year 1689.” Swedenborg told him that
-he was not born in that year, as mentioned, but in the preceding.
-Tuxen asked him if this was an error of the press.
-He said “No;” and added, “you may remember in reading
-my writings to have seen it stated in many parts, that every
-cipher or number has in the spiritual sense a certain correspondence
-or signification. Now,” said he, “when I put the
-true year in that letter, an angel present told me to write
-the year 1689, as much more suitable to myself than the
-other; ‘and you observe,’ added the angel, ‘that with us
-time and space are nothing.’”</p>
-
-<p>We give these anecdotes as Tuxen relates them. Every
-one, however, will know from his private experience how<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_230"></a>[230]</span>
-little absolute dependence is to be placed upon narrations
-of conversations, or actions, by even the most truthful. Sir
-Walter Raleigh, while writing his History of the World,
-was led to think of the errors into which he might be led,
-by observing that an affray beneath his prison wall was
-variously described by several eye-witnesses. If the occurrences
-of the present are so liable to misstatement, what sort
-of faith can we place in the history of the past? Wilkinson,
-commenting on this anecdote of the date of Swedenborg’s
-birth, remarks, in his usual keen style: “We have here a
-reason for that modification of events according to a context,
-of which the Gospel histories, so often discrepant from each
-other, furnish numerous instances. Manifestly it is the plan
-of the context which regards the events from its own point
-of view, and paints the narrative in its own colors. It is
-what all historians do in a lesser way, bending the history
-to ideas, or shaping it with an artistic force. Taking a
-certain larger block of time as a period of birth, it is hieroglyphically
-truthful to play down upon any date contained
-in the block, according to the subject and signification.
-There are many kinds of truth besides black and white;
-and generally, figurative truths require latitude of phrase.
-At the same time it must be confessed that one would like
-to know when the writing is pure history, and when it is a
-base of history, made use of for symbolical purposes, and
-touched, in part, by spirit. Literal people are apt to be
-offended otherwise, and we sympathize with them.”</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg arrived in Amsterdam some time in September,
-1770, and straightway set about printing his manuscript
-of the “True Christian Religion.” From two letters of a
-gentleman, named D. Paulus ab Indagine, who seems to
-have been on familiar terms with Swedenborg, we select the
-following passages, illustrative of this period of his life. He
-writes:—“You asked me what this venerable old man,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_231"></a>[231]</span>
-Swedenborg, is now doing. This I can tell you; he eats
-and drinks very moderately, but keeps his chamber rather
-long, and thirteen hours appear to be not too much for
-him.<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> When I informed him that his work ‘On the Earths
-in the Universe’ had been translated and published, he was
-much delighted, and his eyes, which are always smiling,
-became still more brilliant. He is now indefatigably at
-work; yea, I must say that he labors in a most astonishing
-and superhuman manner at his new work. Only think!
-for every printed sheet, 4to, he has to procure four sheets
-of manuscript; he now prints two sheets every week, and
-corrects them himself, and consequently he has to write
-eight sheets every week; and what appears to me utterly
-inconceivable, he has not a single line beforehand in store.<a id="FNanchor_4" href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a>
-His work is to consist, as he himself states, of about eighty
-sheets in print. The title of this work is the following:—‘True
-Christian Religion, Containing the Universal Theology
-of the New Church, Predicted by the Lord in Daniel viii.
-13, 14, and in the Apocalypse, xxi. 1, 2; By Emanuel
-Swedenborg, Servant of the Lord Jesus Christ.’ I could
-not, in my open manner, conceal my astonishment that he
-should put himself upon the title page as the servant of the
-Lord Jesus Christ. But he replied: ‘I have asked, and
-have not only received permission, but have been ordered to
-do so.’ <i>It is astonishing with what confidence</i> the old gentleman
-speaks of the spiritual world, of the angels, and of God
-himself. If I were only to give you the substance of our
-last conversation, it would fill many pages. He spoke<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_232"></a>[232]</span>
-of naturalists, those who ascribe all things to nature, whom
-he had seen shortly after death, and amongst them were
-even many theologians, or such, at least, as had made
-theology their profession in this life. He told me things
-which made me shudder, but which, however, I pass by, in
-order not to be over-hasty in my judgment respecting him.
-I will willingly admit that I know not what to make of him;
-he is a problem that I can not solve. I sincerely wish that
-upright men, whom God has placed as watchmen upon the
-walls of Zion, had some time since occupied themselves with
-this man.</p>
-
-<p>“I can not forbear to tell you something new about
-Swedenborg. Last Thursday I paid him a visit, and found
-him, as usual, writing. He told me that he had been in
-conversation that same morning, for three hours, with the
-deceased king of Sweden. He had seen him already on
-Wednesday; but as he observed that he was deeply engaged
-in conversation with the queen, who is still living, he would
-not disturb him. I allowed him to continue, but at length
-asked him how it was possible for a person who is still in the
-land of the living, to be met with in the world of spirits.
-He replied, that it was not the queen herself, but her
-<i>spiritus familiaris</i>, or her familiar spirit. I asked him what
-that might be; for I had neither heard from him anything
-respecting appearances of that kind, nor had I read anything
-about them. He then informed me that every man has
-either his good or bad spirit, who is not only constantly with
-him, but sometimes a little removed from him, and appears
-in the world of spirits. But of this, the man still living
-knows nothing; the spirit, however, knows everything. This
-familiar spirit has everything in accordance with his companion
-on earth; he has, in the world of spirits, the same
-figure, the same countenance, and the same tone of voice,
-and wears also similar garments; in a word, this familiar<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_233"></a>[233]</span>
-spirit of the queen, said Swedenborg, appeared exactly as he
-had so often seen the queen herself at Stockholm, and had
-heard her speak. In order to allay my astonishment, he
-added that Dr. Ernesti, of Leipsic, had appeared to him, in
-a similar manner, in the world of spirits, and that he had
-held a long disputation with him. What will the learned
-professor say, when he comes to hear of it? Probably he
-will say that the old man is in his second childhood; he will
-only laugh at it, and who can be surprised? I have often
-wondered at myself, how I could refrain from laughing,
-when I was hearing such extraordinary things from him.
-And what is more, I have often heard him relate the same
-things in a numerous company of ladies and gentlemen,
-when I well knew there were mockers amongst them; but,
-to my great astonishment, not a single person thought
-of laughing. Whilst he is speaking, it is as though every
-person who hears him were charmed, and compelled to
-believe him. He is by no means reserved and recluse, but
-open-hearted and accessible to all. Whoever invites him as
-his guest, may expect to see him. A certain young gentleman
-invited him last week to be his guest, and, although he
-was not acquainted with him, he appeared at his table,
-where he met Jewish and Portuguese gentlemen, with whom
-he freely conversed, without distinction. Whoever is curious
-to see him, has no difficulty; it is only necessary to go to
-his house, and he allows anybody to approach him. It can
-easily be conceived, however, that the numerous visits, to
-which he is liable, deprive him of much time.”</p>
-
-<p>About this time, Dr. Ernesti attacked Swedenborg in his
-Bibliotheca Theologica, and, in reply, Swedenborg published
-a single leaf, which, in its decisive sharpness, is truly effective.
-It is as follows:—</p>
-
-<p>“I have read what Dr. Ernesti has written about me. It
-consists of mere personalities. I do not in it observe a grain<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_234"></a>[234]</span>
-of reason against anything in my writings. As it is against
-the laws of honesty to assail any one with such poisoned
-weapons, I think it beneath me to bandy words with that
-illustrious man. I will not cast back calumnies by calumnies.
-To do this, I should be even with the dogs, which bark
-and bite, or with the lowest drabs, which throw street mud in
-each other’s faces in their brawls. Read, if you will, what
-I have written in my books, and afterwards conclude, but
-from reason, respecting my revelation.”</p>
-
-<p>The Landgrave of Hesse Darmstadt now wrote to Swedenborg,
-requesting information on several subjects. Swedenborg
-having doubt as to the genuineness of the epistle,
-did not at first reply to it, until his misgivings were set aside
-by M. Venator, the minister of that prince. In his reply to
-the Landgrave, he says: “The Lord our Saviour had foretold
-that He would come again into the world, and that he
-would establish there a New Church. But as He cannot
-come again into the world in person, it was necessary that
-He should do it by means of a man, who should not only
-receive the doctrine of this New Church in his understanding,
-but also publish it by printing; and as the Lord had
-prepared me for this office from my infancy, He has manifested
-Himself in person before me, His servant, and sent me
-to fill it.”</p>
-
-<p>The Landgrave again wrote to Swedenborg, inquiring
-about the “miracle” of his intercourse with the Queen of
-Sweden’s brother, and Swedenborg answered that the story
-was true, but “not a miracle.” He also wrote to M. Venator,
-“that such matters ought, by no means, to be considered
-miracles: they are only testimonies that I have been introduced
-by the Lord into the spiritual world, and that I have
-been in association with angels and spirits, in order that the
-Church, which until now had remained in ignorance concerning
-that world, may know that heaven and hell exist in<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_235"></a>[235]</span>
-reality, and that man lives after death, a man, as before;
-and that thus there may be no more doubt as to his immortality.
-Deign, I pray you, to satisfy his Highness, that these
-are not miracles, but only testimonies that I converse with
-angels and spirits. You may see in the ‘True Christian Religion’
-that there are no more miracles at this time; and the
-reason why. It is, that they who do not believe because they
-see no miracles, might easily, by them, be led into fanaticism.”</p>
-
-<p>Writing of miracles, Swedenborg remarks in another
-place, “Instead of miracles, there has taken place, at the
-present day, an open manifestation of the Lord himself, an
-intromission into the spiritual world, and with it, illumination
-by immediate light from the Lord in whatever relates
-to the interior things of the Church, but principally an
-opening of the spiritual sense of the Word, in which the
-Lord is present in his own Divine light. These revelations
-are not miracles, because every man, as to his spirit, is in
-the spiritual world, without separation from his body in the
-natural world. As to myself, indeed, my presence in the
-spiritual world is attended with a certain separation, but only
-as to the intellectual part of my mind, not as to the will
-part. This manifestation of the Lord, and intromission
-into the spiritual world, is more excellent than all miracles;
-but it has not been granted to any one since the creation
-of the world, as it has been to me. The men of the golden
-age, indeed, conversed with angels; but it was not granted
-to them to be in any other light than what was natural.
-To me, however, it has been granted to be in both spiritual
-and natural light at the same time; and hereby I have
-been privileged to see the wonderful things of heaven, to be
-in company with angels, just as I am with men, and at the
-same time to pursue truths in the light of truth, and thus to
-perceive and be gifted with them, consequently to be led by
-the Lord.”</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_236"></a>[236]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XXVII">CHAPTER XXVII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>The True Christian Religion.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>In the early part of 1771, Swedenborg published his
-“True Christian Religion, or, Universal Theology of the
-New Church;” and in August of the same year took ship,
-and left Amsterdam for London. Let us now turn to the
-consideration of his last great work,—a summary of the
-doctrines he was commissioned to teach.</p>
-
-<p>“The True Christian Religion, containing the Universal
-Theology of the New Church,” the last work published by
-Swedenborg, may be looked upon as the summary of his
-spiritual thought, his theological labors, his heavenly message
-to mankind. In its ninth English edition, it forms a large
-octavo volume of 815 pages, and is a complete body of divinity.
-It is divided into fifteen chapters, a Supplement
-treating of the states of Luther, Calvin, and Melancthon,
-the Dutch, English, Germans, Papists, Romish saints, Mahommedans,
-and the Africans, in the spiritual world; and
-seventy-seven memorable relations of scenes and representations
-witnessed in that world, interspersed between the
-various chapters; altogether forming a volume unique in
-literature, ancient or modern. At the risk of an occasional
-repetition of what has before been said, let us take a
-rapid survey of the contents of this massive and marvellous
-work.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter I. treats of God the Creator, His Unity, the Divine
-Esse which is Jehovah, His Infinity or His Immensity<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_237"></a>[237]</span>
-and Eternity, the Essence of God which is His Divine Love
-and Wisdom, His Omnipotence, Omniscience, and Omnipresence,
-and of the creation of the universe. On these
-sublime subjects, themes on which, for ages, the weary reason
-of man has exerted itself with the poorest results, Swedenborg,
-with a mathematical exactness, sets forth the true
-doctrine; and with a simplicity of logic which at every step
-calls the Word of God, and the reason and common sense
-of man, to witness; leading the reader to wonder why truths
-so simple, so soul-satisfying, should have been hidden from
-human eyes so long. Whilst elucidating subjects commonly
-supposed to transcend human ideas, and yet which humanity
-is ever restless to discover,—reverence is in nowise deprived
-of its exercise. It is a great mistake, yet a common one, to
-associate mystery with true reverence; to talk of “ignorance”
-as “the mother of devotion.” Let any one ask himself
-whether the reverence of Sir Isaac Newton for that God
-whose operations in the universe he was favored to discover,
-was inferior to that of an ignorant devotee, or an illiterate
-peasant. No. A knowledge of God and His attributes is
-no destroyer of faith, reverence, or devotion, but the reverse.
-Our knowledge of Him, however extended, is but the enlargement
-of a circle, which, as it is enlarged, expands our
-conception of the infinity beyond. Hence it is that whilst
-this chapter on God the Creator, goes into details which are
-the death of mysticism, the truths which it opens to the mind
-lead to an intelligent and reverential love, to which ignorance
-can never attain.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter II. is devoted to the consideration of the Lord
-the Redeemer. It tells how Jehovah God descended and
-assumed humanity, that He might redeem and save mankind;
-and how the humanity was united to the Divinity,
-and thus God was made man, and man God, in one Person;
-that Redemption consisted in bringing the hells into subjection,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_238"></a>[238]</span>
-and the heavens into order, and in thus preparing the
-way for a new spiritual Church; and how, without such Redemption,
-neither could men have been saved, nor could the
-angels have remained in a state of integrity. Thus Redemption
-was a work purely divine, and could not have been
-effected but by God Incarnate. The passion of the cross
-was in itself alone not Redemption, but was the last temptation
-the Lord endured in His Humanity; and it was the
-means of the glorification of that humanity. Hence it is a
-fundamental error of the Church to believe the passion of
-the cross to be Redemption itself; and this error, together
-with that relating to three Divine Persons from eternity,
-has perverted the whole system of Christian theology.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter III. sets forth the doctrine of the Holy Spirit
-and the Divine Operation. The Holy Spirit is the Divine
-Truth, and also the Divine Virtue and Operation, proceeding
-from the One God, in whom there is the Divine Trinity,
-thus from the Lord God the Saviour, Jesus Christ. The
-Divine Virtue and Operation in and on humanity, signified
-by the Holy Spirit, consists, in general, in reformation
-and regeneration; and, in proportion as these are effected,
-in renovation, vivification, sanctification, and justification;
-and in proportion as these are effected, in purification from
-evils, remission of sins, and finally salvation. The Holy
-Spirit being the efflux of Jehovah through the glorified
-humanity, did not exist until after the incarnation. Hence
-it is nowhere said in the Old Testament, that the prophets
-spoke from the Holy Spirit, but from Jehovah God. We
-have a beautiful and irresistible confirmation of this truth
-in these words, “for the Holy Spirit was not <i>yet, because</i>
-that Jesus was not yet glorified.” John vii. 39.</p>
-
-<p>In this chapter he also speaks of the Trinity. There is a
-Divine Trinity, consisting of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit;
-and these three are the three <i>Essentials</i> of One God,—which<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_239"></a>[239]</span>
-make a One, like soul, body, and operation in man. To
-conceive of a Trinity of Divine <i>persons</i> from eternity, is to
-think of three Gods; and no amount of word-playing and
-creed-making can prevent the mind from falling into Tritheism,
-as long as a Trinity of <i>persons</i> and not of <i>essentials</i> is
-spoken and thought of. A Trinity of persons was unknown
-in the Apostolic Church. The doctrine was first broached
-by the Council of Nice, and thence received into the Roman
-Catholic Church, and thus propagated among the Reformed
-Churches. The Nicene and Athanasian doctrines concerning
-a Trinity, have, together, given rise to a faith which has
-entirely perverted the Christian Church; and hence has come
-that “abomination of desolation, and that affliction, such as
-was not in all the world, neither shall be,” which the Lord
-has foretold in Daniel, the Evangelists, and the Revelation.
-For when the Church ceases to know its God, the central
-point of all faith and doctrine, all subsidiary points must
-necessarily become involved in darkness. And thus it is
-that the Athanasian creed has given rise to so many absurd
-notions about God, and hence, also, to an innumerable
-brood of heresies and phantasies on every point of doctrine
-and life, so much so, that had not the Lord effected a Last
-Judgment in 1757, and established a New Heaven and a
-New Church, no flesh could have been saved. The “healing
-of the nations,” the new life, light and heat, that have
-coursed through humanity during the past century, attest
-the working of Omnipotence for the salvation and restoration
-of what is most valuable and precious in man.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter IV. is an exposition of the nature of the Sacred
-Scripture, or the Word of the Lord, proving it to be the
-Divine Truth itself. The spiritual sense of the Word, and
-the means by which it is unfolded, together with the law
-of its composition, are explained at length, and with great
-perspicuity. It is shown that the spiritual sense is in all<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_240"></a>[240]</span>
-and every part of the Word, that hence it is divinely
-inspired, and is holy in every syllable. Nevertheless the
-literal sense is not to be disregarded. It is the basis, the
-continent, and the firmament of the spiritual sense; in it the
-Divine Truth is in its fullness, its sanctity, and its power;
-from it the doctrine of the Church is to be drawn and
-confirmed; and by it conjunction with the Lord and consociation
-with the angels is effected. The Word is in all
-the heavens, and the wisdom of the angels is thence derived.
-The Church exists from the Word, and the quality of the
-Church with man is according to his understanding of the
-Word. The marriage of Goodness and Truth, and of the
-Lord and the Church, is in every part of the Word. Men
-may collect and imbibe heretical opinions from the letter
-of the Word; but it is hurtful to confirm such opinions.
-Many things in the Word are appearances of truth, in which
-genuine truths lie concealed; and many fallacies arise from
-the taking of these appearances of truth for genuine or
-absolute truth. The literal sense of the Word is a guard to
-the genuine truths contained in it, and in the Word is
-represented by cherubs. To the wicked, it is a mercy that
-spiritual truth is thus hidden; for if known and not obeyed,
-it is profaned, and profanation involves the deepest suffering
-and distress. The Lord, during his abode in the world,
-fulfilled all things contained in the Word, and was thus
-made the Word, that is, the Divine Truth, even in ultimates.
-Previous to the Word which the world now possesses, there
-was a Word which is lost, but is preserved in heaven among
-the angels who lived as men in those times, and is also
-extant among certain nations in Great Tartary, who, however,
-have probably no true idea of the treasure they possess.
-By means of the Word, light is communicated to those who
-are out of the pale of the Church, and are not in possession
-of the Word. This is effected outwardly by the communications<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_241"></a>[241]</span>
-of commerce, with those nations who have the Word;
-and internally and insensibly by that community of soul
-which makes humanity appear before the Lord as one man.
-There is no thought conceived, no deed done, but which
-radiates from soul to soul, and produces effects of which the
-doer is not conscious. Thus it is that the Church—composed
-of the men who read, love, and obey the Word—benefits the
-world, and conjoins it with heaven and the Lord. Without
-the Word, no one would have any knowledge of God,
-of heaven and hell, or of a life after death, and much less
-of the Lord. The multiplicity of points involved in these
-statements, receive, in this chapter on the Sacred Scripture,
-most copious illustrations, both from the Word itself, and
-from the common experience of mankind. In reading this
-chapter, every candid person will feel that, strange and
-novel as many of the statements are, he is not dealing with
-a mere theorizer; and that facts and even Revelation itself
-must be done away, ere the doctrine of the Sacred Scripture
-here revealed can be overthrown or proved erroneous.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter V. explains the Decalogue, or the Ten Commandments,
-as to their external and internal sense. The Decalogue,
-in the Israelitish Church, was the very essence of
-holiness, and from it the ark and the tabernacle derived
-their sanctity. In the Ten Commandments are contained
-all things which relate to love to God, and love towards our
-neighbor. In its literal sense, the Decalogue contains general
-precepts of doctrine and life, but in its spiritual and
-celestial sense it contains all precepts universally. Swedenborg
-then takes up each commandment singly, and gives an
-exposition of its literal, spiritual, and celestial application;
-and when he has done this, we perceive that these Ten
-Commandments, which every school-boy repeats and feels
-he understands, nevertheless contain all precepts, and are
-such as may afford guidance to the wisest angel, and that<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_242"></a>[242]</span>
-man can never outgrow them. Taking, for instance, the
-Seventh Commandment, (the eighth, according to the common
-numbering,) “Thou shalt not steal,” he explains it in
-the natural sense, after the common acceptation. In the
-spiritual sense, he shows that to steal means to deprive
-others of the truths which they embrace in faith, in teaching
-doctrines known to be false, or teaching for the sake of gain;
-and in destroying in others, either by word or deed, those
-truths which lead to salvation. In the celestial sense, to
-steal is to take away divine power from the Lord, to be
-vain, to be proud, to arrogate to ourselves the merit and
-righteousness which are the divine gifts. All who do such
-things, notwithstanding their seeming adoration of God, do
-not trust in Him, but in themselves; and likewise do not
-believe in God, but in themselves; they steal from God;
-they are spiritual thieves; and every one who knows his
-own heart, must know how often he must refer to this
-commandment, in order to govern his life, and restrain his
-thoughts, before he can know perfect obedience, and be in
-truth a child of God. As with this commandment, so with
-all. We need to think of them every day, and to use them
-in all our states. If we purpose to lead a true and happy
-life, we must cherish them as constant companions.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter VI. treats of Faith. Faith, it is said, is first in
-regard to time, and charity is first in regard to end; that is,
-the use of faith is to lead to charity. A saving faith is a
-faith in the Lord God the Saviour Jesus Christ, because He
-is the visible God in whom is the invisible. Faith, in general,
-consists in a belief that the Lord will save all who live
-a good life and believe aright; and a man receives this faith
-in consequence of approaching the Lord, learning truths
-from the Word, and living a life in conformity with them.
-Faith without charity is not faith, and charity without faith
-is not charity; and neither faith nor charity has any life in<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_243"></a>[243]</span>
-it but from the Lord. Although a man has power given
-him to procure for himself faith and charity, and the life of
-faith and charity, yet nothing of faith, charity, or the life
-of either, is from man, but from the Lord alone. Charity
-and faith are together in good works; for charity consists in
-willing what is good, and good works consist in doing what
-is good, from and under the influence of a good will; and
-both charity and faith are merely mental and perishable
-things, unless they are determined to works, and coexist in
-them, whenever there is opportunity. The wicked have no
-faith, because wickedness is of hell, and faith is of heaven,
-and all the truth of faith is derived from heaven. Faith
-cannot dwell with evil, for evil is like fire,—infernal fire
-being the love of evil, which consumes faith like stubble,
-and reduces it and all that belongs to it to ashes. Evil
-dwells in darkness, and faith in light; and evil by means of
-the falsehood which it loves, extinguishes faith, as darkness
-does light. And because the world is at this day full of
-evil, (notwithstanding the morality of life, and the rationality
-with which faith is spoken and written about,) of true
-faith there is almost none, because of goodness there is almost
-none.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter VII. discourses of love towards our neighbor, and
-good works. It is introduced by the statement that there
-are three universal loves, the love of heaven, the love of the
-world, and the love of self. These three loves, when they
-are in right subordination, make a man perfect; but when
-they are not in right subordination, they pervert and invert
-him. The love of self and of the world are not in themselves
-evil. When the love of heaven, that is, the love of
-God, of goodness and truth, is supreme in the mind, and the
-world is loved as a means to do good, and self is cared for
-that uses to the neighbor may be performed,—then the love
-of self and of the world are orderly and justifiable. But<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_244"></a>[244]</span>
-when the love of God and heaven is dethroned, and the love
-of self or of the world rules, and a man is religious and just
-only so far as religion and justice conduce to self-interest
-and thus God and justice and all things holy are put to vile
-uses, then the soul of man is inverted,—is a form of hell;
-and in the light of heaven appears bestial, ugly, and deformed.</p>
-
-<p>Every individual man is the neighbor whom we ought to
-love, but according to the quality of his goodness or his life.
-Man considered collectively, that is, as a lesser or larger society,
-and considered under the idea of compound societies,
-that is, as our country,—is the neighbor that ought to be
-loved. The Church is our neighbor, to be loved in a still
-higher degree, and the Lord’s kingdom is our neighbor to be
-loved in the highest degree. To love the neighbor is not to
-love his person, but the good which is in him. Charity itself
-consists in acting justly and faithfully in whatever office,
-business, and employment a person is engaged, and with
-whomsoever he has any connection. Eleemosynary acts of
-charity consist in giving to the poor, and relieving the indigent,
-but with prudence. There are public, domestic, and
-private duties of charity. Public duties of charity are,
-more especially, the payment of imposts and taxes. These
-are paid with different feelings by those who are spiritual
-and by those who are natural: those who are spiritual pay
-them out of good will, because they are collected for the
-preservation and protection of their country and the church,
-and as a provision for the proper officers and governors, who
-must receive their salaries out of the public treasury, therefore
-those who consider their country and the church as their
-neighbor, pay such debts cheerfully and with a willing mind,
-and consider it a wicked act either to withhold them or to
-use any deceit in the payment; whereas those who do not
-esteem their country and the church as their neighbor, pay<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_245"></a>[245]</span>
-such debts with a reluctant and unwilling mind, and, as
-often as they have an opportunity, withhold them, or use
-some fraud in the payment; for they regard only their own
-house and their own flesh as their neighbor. The domestic
-duties of charity are of several kinds, as those of a husband
-to his wife, and of a wife to her husband; of parents to
-their children, and of children to their parents; likewise of
-a master and mistress to their servants, and of servants to
-their master and mistress. There are so many duties relating
-to the education of children, and the government of families,
-that it would require a volume to enumerate them. As
-to what particularly regards the duties of parents to their
-children, there is an intrinsic difference in this respect with
-those who are under the influence of charity, and with those
-who are not, although externally the duties may appear
-similar. With those who are under the influence of charity,
-parental affection is joined with love toward their neighbor
-and love to God, and such parents love their children according
-to their morals, virtues, pursuits, and qualifications
-for the service of the public; but with those who are not
-under the influence of charity, there is no conjunction of
-charity with parental affection; the consequence is, that such
-parents frequently love wicked, immoral, and crafty children,
-more than those who are good, moral, and prudent;
-and thus prefer such as are unserviceable to the public, before
-such as are serviceable. Private duties of charity are
-also of several kinds, such as paying wages to workmen,
-returning borrowed money, observing agreements, keeping
-pledges, and other transactions of a like nature, some of
-which are duties grounded in statute law, some in civil law,
-and some in moral law. These duties, also, are discharged
-from different motives by those who are under the influence
-of charity, and by those who are not; by the former they
-are discharged faithfully and justly, for the law of charity<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_246"></a>[246]</span>
-requires that a man should so act in all his dealings, with
-whomsoever he may have any connection; but these duties
-are discharged in a totally different manner by those who
-are not influenced by charity. Then there are convivial recreations
-of charity, which consist of dinners and suppers
-and social intercourse. Every one knows that dinner and
-supper parties are in general use, and are given to promote
-various ends; by many on account of friendship, relationship,
-mirth, gain, recompense, and for party purposes of
-corruption; among the great they are given on account of
-their dignity; and in the palaces of kings, for the display
-of splendor and magnificence. But dinners and suppers of
-charity are given only by those who are influenced by mutual
-love grounded in a similarity of faith. Among Christians
-in the Primitive Church, dinners and suppers had this
-end alone in view, and were called feasts, being instituted
-that they might meet together in cordial joy and friendly
-union. At table, the guests conversed together on various
-subjects, domestic and civil, but particularly on such as concerned
-the Church; and as these feasts were feasts of charity,
-their conversation on every subject was influenced by
-charity, with all its joys and delights. The spiritual sphere
-which prevailed on such occasions, was a sphere of love to
-the Lord and toward the neighbor, which exhilarated every
-mind, softened the tone of every expression, and communicated
-to all the senses a festivity from the heart; for from
-every man there emanates a spiritual sphere, derived from
-the affection of his love and corresponding thought, which
-inwardly affects those in his company, particularly at the
-time of convivial recreations.</p>
-
-<p>The first part of charity consists in putting away evils,
-and the second in doing actions that are useful to our
-neighbor. It is believed by many, at the present day, that
-charity consists only in doing good, and that while a man is<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_247"></a>[247]</span>
-doing good, he does no evil; consequently, that the first part
-of charity is to do good, and the second not to do evil: but
-the case is altogether the reverse, it being the first part
-of charity to put away evil, and the second to do good.
-For it is a universal law in the spiritual world, and thence
-too in the natural world, that so far as a person wills no
-evil, he wills what is good; consequently, so far as he turns
-himself away from hell, whence all evil ascends, he turns
-himself toward heaven, whence all good descends; and,
-therefore, so far as any one rejects the devil, he is accepted
-by the Lord. In performing the exercises of charity, a man
-does not ascribe merit to works, so long as he believes that
-all good is from the Lord. Moral life, if it is at the same
-time spiritual life, is charity. The friendship of love, contracted
-with a person without regard to his spiritual quality,
-is detrimental after death. The friendship of love, among
-the wicked, is intestine hatred toward each other. There is
-spurious charity, hypocritical charity, and dead charity.
-There can be no such thing as genuine charity, which is
-living, unless it make one with faith, and unless both in
-conjunction look to the Lord. Spurious charity is such as
-is the charity of those who hold to faith alone for salvation,
-and who say charity is of no account in leading to heaven.
-Such charity as these may have is spurious, because not
-spiritual, and merely performed from selfish and worldly
-motives. Hypocritical charity is predicable of those who,
-in public or private worship, bow themselves almost to the
-ground before God, pour forth long prayers with great
-devotion, put on a sanctified appearance, kiss crucifixes and
-bones of the dead, and kneel at sepulchers, and there mutter
-words expressive of holy veneration toward God, and yet,
-in their hearts nourish self-worship, and seek to be adored
-like so many deities. Dead charity is predicable of those
-whose faith is dead, since the quality of charity depends on<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_248"></a>[248]</span>
-the quality of faith. Faith is dead in all who are without
-works, and in those who believe not in God, but in living
-and dead men, and worship idols as if they were holy in
-themselves, after the practice of the old Gentiles.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter VIII. is devoted to the vexed question of Free-Determination,
-or Free-Will. The doctrines of the Church,
-as commonly held, are first stated, and then the New Church
-doctrine on the question is explained under the following
-heads:—The two trees in the garden of Eden, one of life,
-and the other of the knowledge of good and evil, signify the
-free-will which man enjoys in respect to spiritual things.
-Man is not life, but a recipient of life from God. Man,
-during his abode in the world, is held in the midst between
-heaven and hell, and thus in a spiritual equilibrium, which
-constitutes free will.</p>
-
-<p>From the permission of evil, which every man experiences
-in his internal man, it is evident that man has free-will in
-spiritual things. Without free-will in spiritual things, the
-Word would not be of any use, consequently the Church
-would be a nonentity. Without free-will in spiritual things,
-man would have nothing which would enable him to conjoin
-himself by reciprocation with the Lord; and consequently
-there would be no imputation, but mere predestination,
-which is detestable. Without free-will in spiritual things,
-God would be chargeable as the cause of evil. Every
-spiritual principle of the Church that is admitted and
-received in freedom, remains, but not otherwise. The
-human will and understanding enjoy this free-will; but the
-commission of evil, both in the spiritual and natural worlds,
-is restrained by laws, or else society in both would perish.
-If men were destitute of free-will in spiritual things, it would
-be possible for all men throughout the whole world, in a
-single day, to be induced to believe in the Lord; but this
-would be in vain, because nothing remains with man which<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_249"></a>[249]</span>
-is not freely received. Miracles are not performed at the
-present day because they deprive man of free-will.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter IX. treats of Repentance. It is shown, in the
-first place, that repentance is the first constituent of the
-Church in man, and that in proportion as a man practices
-it, his sins are removed; and as they are removed, they are
-forgiven or remitted. Contrition, in the sense of a mere
-lip-confession of being a sinner, and of being involved in the
-guilt of Adam, without self-examination, is not repentance.
-Every man is born with a propensity to evils of all kinds,
-and unless he remove them, in part, by repentance, he
-remains in them; and whoever remains in them can not be
-saved. The knowledge of sin, and the discovery of some
-particular sin in one’s self, is the beginning of repentance.
-Actual repentance consists in a man’s examining himself,
-knowing and acknowledging his sins, supplicating the Lord,
-and beginning a new life. True repentance consists in a
-man’s examining not only the actions of his life, but also
-the intentions of his will. Those also do the work of repentance,
-who, though they do not examine themselves, abstain
-from evils because they are sins; and this kind of repentance
-is done by those who perform works of charity from a
-religious motive. In repentance, confession ought to be
-made before the Lord God the Saviour, and at the same
-time supplication for help, and power to resist evils. Actual
-repentance is an easy duty to those who occasionally practice
-it, but it meets with violent opposition from those who never
-practiced it. He that never did the work of repentance,
-and never looked into, and examined, himself, comes at last
-not to know the nature either of damnatory evil or saving
-good.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter X. describes the nature of Reformation and
-Regeneration. Unless a man be born again, and, as it
-were, created anew, he can not enter into the kingdom<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_250"></a>[250]</span>
-of God. This new birth, or creation, is effected by the Lord
-alone, through the medium of charity and faith, during
-man’s coöperation. Since all are redeemed, all have a
-capacity to be regenerated, every one according to his state.
-The several stages of man’s regeneration answer to his
-natural conception, gestation in the womb, birth, and education.
-The first act of the new birth, which is an act of the
-understanding, is called reformation; and the second, which
-is an act of the will, and thence of the understanding, is
-called regeneration. The internal man is first to be reformed,
-and by it the external, and thus the man is regenerated.
-When this takes place, there arises a combat between the
-internal and external man, and then whichever conquers
-has dominion over the other. The regenerate man has a
-new will and understanding. A regenerate man is in communion
-with the angels of heaven, and an unregenerate
-man is in communion with the spirits of hell. In proportion
-as a man is regenerated, his sins are removed; and this
-removal is what is meant by remission of sins. Regeneration,
-can not be effected without free-will in spiritual things.
-Regeneration is not attainable without truths by which faith
-is formed, and with which charity conjoins itself.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter XI. is devoted to a description of what imputation
-is, and what it is not. It is shown that imputation, and the
-faith of the present church, which alone is said to justify,
-are a one. The imputation which belongs to the faith of the
-present time is two fold, the one part relating to the merit
-of Christ, and the other to salvation as its consequence.
-The faith which is imputative of the merit and righteousness
-of Christ the Redeemer, first took its rise from the decrees
-of the Council of Nice, concerning three divine persons from
-eternity; and, from that time to the present, has been
-received by the whole Christian world. Faith imputative
-of the merit of Christ, was not known in the Apostolic<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_251"></a>[251]</span>
-Church, which preceded the Council of Nice, and is neither
-declared nor signified in any part of the Word. An imputation
-of the merits and righteousness of Christ is impossible.
-There is such a thing as imputation, but then it is an
-imputation of good and evil, and at the same time of faith.
-The faith and imputation of the New Church can not be
-together with the faith and imputation of the former Church;
-and, in case they were together, such a collision and conflict
-would ensue, that every principle of the Church in man
-would perish. The Lord imputes good to every man, and
-hell imputes evil to every man. Faith, with whatever
-principle it conjoins itself, passes sentence accordingly; if a
-true faith conjoins itself with goodness, the sentence is for
-eternal life, but if faith conjoins itself with evil, the sentence
-is for eternal death. Thought is imputed to no one, but will.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter XII. is a luminous exposition of the uses of Baptism.
-Without a knowledge of the spiritual sense of the
-Word, it is shown no one can know what the two sacraments,
-Baptism and the Holy Supper, involve and effect. The
-washing which is called baptism, signifies spiritual washing,
-which is a purification from evils and falses, and thus
-regeneration. As circumcision of the heart was represented
-by circumcision of the foreskin, baptism was instituted in
-lieu of it, to the end that an internal Church might succeed
-the external, in which all and everything was a figure of the
-internal Church. The first use of baptism is introduction
-into the Christian Church, and at the same time insertion
-among Christians in the spiritual world. The second use
-of baptism is, that the Christian may know and acknowledge
-the Lord Jesus Christ the Redeemer and Saviour, and may
-follow Him. The third and final use of baptism is, that
-man may be regenerated. By the baptism of John, a way
-was prepared that Jehovah the Lord might come down into
-the world, and accomplish the work of redemption.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_252"></a>[252]</span></p>
-
-<p>Chapter XIII. is taken up with a like description of the
-uses of the Holy Supper. It is shown that it is impossible
-for any one, without an acquaintance with the correspondences
-of natural things with spiritual, to know the uses and
-benefits of the Holy Supper. An acquaintance with correspondences
-serves to discover the signification of the Lord’s
-flesh and blood, and that the bread and wine signify the
-same; namely, that the Lord’s flesh and the bread signify
-the divine good of His love, and likewise all the good
-of charity, and that His blood and the wine signify the
-divine truth of His wisdom, and likewise all the truth
-of faith, and that to eat signifies to appropriate. By understanding
-this, it may clearly be comprehended, that the
-Holy Supper contains, both universally and particularly, all
-things of the Church, and all things of heaven. In the
-Holy Supper the Lord is entirely present, with the whole
-of His redemption. The Lord is present, and opens heaven
-to those who approach the Holy Supper worthily; and He
-is also present with those who approach it unworthily, but
-does not open heaven to them; consequently, as baptism is
-an introduction into the Church, so the Holy Supper is an
-introduction into heaven. Those approach the Holy Supper
-worthily, who are under the influence of faith toward the
-Lord, and of charity toward their neighbor, thus, who are
-regenerate. Those who approach the Holy Supper worthily,
-are in the Lord, and He in them; consequently, conjunction
-with the Lord is effected by the Holy Supper. The Holy
-Supper is, to the worthy receivers, as a signing and sealing
-that they are sons of God.</p>
-
-<p>Chapter XIV., concluding the doctrinal portion of the
-work, describes the consummation of the age, the coming
-of the Lord, and the new heaven and the New Church.
-The consummation of the age is the last time or end of the
-Church. The present day is the last time of the Christian<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_253"></a>[253]</span>
-Church, which the Lord foretold and described in the
-Gospels, and in the Revelation. This last time of the
-Christian Church, is the very night in which the former
-Churches have set. After this night, morning succeeds; and
-the coming of the Lord is this morning. The coming of the
-Lord is not a coming to destroy the visible heaven and the
-habitable earth, and to create a new heaven and a new
-earth, according to the opinions which many, from not
-understanding the spiritual sense of the Word, have hitherto
-entertained. This, which is the second coming of the Lord,
-is for the sake of separating the evil from the good, that
-those who have believed and who do believe in Him, may
-be saved; and that there may be formed of them a new
-angelic heaven, and a New Church on earth; and without
-this coming no flesh could be saved. This second coming
-of the Lord is not a coming in person, but in the Word,
-which is from Him, and is Himself. This second coming
-of the Lord is effected by the instrumentality of a man,
-before whom He has manifested Himself in person, and
-whom He has filled with His spirit, to teach from Him the
-doctrines of the New Church by means of the Word. This
-is meant by the new heaven and the new earth, and the
-New Jerusalem descending out of heaven, spoken of in the
-Revelation. This New Church is the crown of all the
-Churches which have existed, to this time, on the earth.</p>
-
-<p>On all these subjects Swedenborg discourses at length, and
-in a style which, for its combined simplicity and purity, we
-believe, is unmatched in theological literature. Wilkinson
-says truly of the volume, that, “viewed as a digest, it shows
-a presence of mind, an administration of materials, and a
-faculty of handling, of an extraordinary kind. There is old
-age in it in the sense of ripeness. If the intellectualist
-misses there somewhat of the range of discourse, it is compensated
-by a certain triteness of wisdom. As a polemic,<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_254"></a>[254]</span>
-not only against the errors of the Churches, but against the
-evil lives and self-excusings of Christians, the work is unrivaled.
-The criticisms of doctrine, with which it abounds,
-are masterly in the extreme; and were it compared with
-any similar body of theology, we feel no doubt that the
-palm of coherency, vigor, and comprehensiveness, would
-easily fall to Swedenborg, upon the verdict of judges of
-whatever Church.”</p>
-
-<p>We have said nothing of the seventy-six memorable relations
-strewn through the pages of the “True Christian
-Religion,” because the limits to which we are confined forbid
-anything approaching to an adequate description of them.
-They are a great trouble to new readers of Swedenborg, and
-many who love and delight in the doctrinal teachings of the
-work, pass over, unread, the memorable relations, and try
-not to think of them. But this is only for a time. They
-are only strange and incomprehensible because the principles
-upon which they are written are not apprehended. The
-Indian king, who was told that in northern lands water
-became solid, so that his elephants might walk on it, laughed,
-and was an unbeliever. But, had the law or principle by
-which water becomes ice, been made plain to him, his
-laughter and his unbelief would have ceased. So it is with
-those who are shocked with Swedenborg’s relations of things
-heard and seen in the spiritual world. Let but the great
-law of correspondence be understood, and the most marvelous
-of the relations straightway attain an interest and reality,
-which none but those who have studied them under the
-bright light of correspondences can understand, or easily
-believe possible. A memorable relation, which was to the
-writer of this, at one time, a thing to cause pity for the man
-that wrote it, is now the pleasant and practical study of a
-Sunday afternoon. He knows that his experience in this
-respect is paralleled by that of most Newchurchmen.</p>
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_255"></a>[255]</span></p>
-
-<p>Count Hopken, in a letter to General Tuxen, says, “I
-once represented, in rather a serious manner, to this venerable
-man, (Swedenborg), that I thought he would do better
-not to mix his beautiful writings with so many memorable
-relations of things heard and seen in the spiritual world,
-concerning the states of men after death,—of which ignorance
-makes a jest and derision. But he answered me, that
-this did not depend on him; that he was too old to sport
-with spiritual things, and too much concerned for his eternal
-happiness to give into foolish notions; assuring me, on his
-hopes of salvation, that no imagination produced in him his
-revelations, which were true, and derived from what he had
-heard and seen.”</p>
-
-<p>“The True Christian Religion” was the last work Swedenborg
-published; it was a worthy conclusion of his grand
-labors. Among his papers, at his decease, was found an incomplete
-“Coronis” or Appendix to the work. This has
-been translated and published, and contains an elucidation
-of several interesting points.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_256"></a>[256]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XXVIII">CHAPTER XXVIII.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Anecdotes and Traits of Character.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>Swedenborg arrived in London, from Amsterdam, in
-August, 1771, and took up his abode in lodgings he had before
-occupied in the house of Shearsmith, a peruke maker, at
-26 Great Bath street, Cold Bath fields. From Shearsmith
-we learn several interesting items of intelligence regarding
-Swedenborg’s habits and mode of life.</p>
-
-<p>The dress that he generally wore when he went out to
-visit, was a suit of black velvet, (made after an old fashion,)
-a pair of long ruffles, a curiously hilted sword, and a gold-headed
-cane. In his later years he became less and less
-attentive to the concerns of the world. When walking
-abroad, he seemed to be engaged in spiritual communion,
-and took little notice of things and people in the streets.
-When he went out in Stockholm, without the observation of
-his domestics, some singularity in his dress would often betray
-his abstraction. Once when he dined with Robsahm’s
-father, he appeared with one shoe-buckle of plain silver, and
-the other set with precious stones,—greatly to the amusement
-of some ladies of the party. When he lodged with Bergstrom,
-he usually walked out after breakfast, dressed neatly
-in velvet, and made a good appearance. In Sweden his
-dress was simple, but neat and convenient: during winter,
-he was clad in a garment of reindeer skins; and, in summer,
-in a study gown: “both well worn, as became a philosopher,”
-according to Robsahm. Mr. Servanté was one of
-the earliest and most affectionate receivers of New Church<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_257"></a>[257]</span>
-doctrine. Before he received the truths of the New Church,
-he was once passing along St. John’s street, London,
-when he met an old gentleman, of a dignified and most
-venerable appearance, whose deeply thoughtful, yet mildly
-expressive countenance, added to something very unusual in
-his general air, attracted his attention very forcibly. He
-turned round, therefore, to take another view of the stranger,
-who also turned around and looked at him. This was Swedenborg;
-but it was not until some years afterward, on seeing
-his portrait, that he became aware that the dignified and
-venerable old gentleman was the author of those works he
-now so sincerely loved, and so earnestly studied.</p>
-
-<p>In person, Swedenborg was about 5 feet 9 inches high,
-rather thin, and of a brown complexion. His eyes were of
-a brownish grey, nearly hazel, and rather small. He had
-always a cheerful smile upon his countenance. When Collin
-visited him, he was thin and pale, but still retained traces
-of beauty, and had something very pleasing in his physiognomy,
-and a dignity in his erect stature. Ab Indagine tells
-us his eyes were always smiling; and Robsahm, that his
-“countenance was always illuminated by the light of his
-uncommon genius.” His manners were those of a nobleman
-and gentleman of the last century. He was somewhat
-reserved, but complaisant; accessible to all, and had something
-very loving and taking in his demeanor. Personally,
-he left good impressions behind him wherever he
-appeared.</p>
-
-<p>He did not understand the English language sufficiently
-well to hold a running conversation in it; and moreover he
-had an impediment in his speech. He was well acquainted,
-however, with the principal modern languages, and, of
-course, was thoroughly familiar with Greek and Latin, and
-had a sufficient knowledge of Hebrew. All authorities
-agree that his speech, though not facile, was impressive.<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_258"></a>[258]</span>
-He spoke with deliberation, and when his voice was heard,
-it was a signal for silence in others, while the slowness of his
-delivery increased the curiosity of the listeners. He entered
-into no disputes on matters of religion, but when obliged to
-defend himself, he did it mildly and briefly; and if any one
-insisted upon argument, and became warm against him, he
-retired, with a recommendation to them to read his writings.
-One day, when Mr. Cookworthy, a member of the Society of
-Friends, was with Swedenborg in his lodging, a person
-present objected to something he said, and argued the point
-in his own way; but Swedenborg only replied, “I receive
-information from the angels on such things.” One day, when
-dining with some Swedish clergy in London, a polemic tried
-to controvert the doctrine concerning the Lord, and the nature
-of our duty to Him; when, according to Mr. Burkhardt,
-“Swedenborg overthrew the tenets of his opponent, who appeared
-but a child to him in knowledge.”</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg was practically a vegetarian. Shearsmith
-said he sometimes ate a few eels, and his servant informs us
-that he once had some pigeon pie; but his usual diet was
-bread and butter, milk and coffee, almonds and raisins, vegetables,
-biscuits, cakes, and gingerbread. The gingerbread
-he used to take out with him into the area of Cold Bath
-square, (now covered with houses,) and distribute it among
-the children as they played around him. He was a water-drinker,
-but occasionally, when in company, drank one or
-two glasses of wine, but never more. He took no supper.
-Of coffee he was a great drinker, which he took very sweet,
-and without milk. At his house in Stockholm, he had a fire
-during winter almost constantly in his study, at which he
-made his own coffee and drank it often, both during the day
-and in the night.</p>
-
-<p>From the commencement of his illumination, Swedenborg
-was very particular as to his diet; and his Diary contains<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_259"></a>[259]</span>
-many references to his food, and to the spiritual association
-which various kinds of nutriment induced. In one place we
-read under the heading of “the Stink of Intemperance,”
-“One evening I took a great meal of milk and bread, more
-than the spirits considered good for me. On this occasion
-they dwelt upon intemperance, and accused me of it.” Indeed,
-on the first opening of his spiritual sight, in London,
-in 1743, when being very hungry from much exercise, he ate
-with great appetite, the spiritual stranger who appeared, saluted
-him with the words, “Eat not so much.” In his treatise
-on Heaven and Hell, n. 299, he writes: “It has also
-been granted me to know the origin of the anxiety, grief of
-mind, and interior sadness, called melancholy, with which
-man is afflicted. There are certain spirits who are not yet in
-conjunction with hell, being yet in their first state, who love
-undigested and malignant substances, such as food when it
-lies corrupting in the stomach. They consequently are present
-where such substances are to be found in man, because
-these are delightful to them; and they there converse with
-one another from their own evil affection. The affection
-contained in their discourse thence enters the man by influx;
-and if it is opposed to the man’s affection, he experiences
-melancholy, sadness, and anxiety; whereas if it agrees with
-his affection, he becomes gay and cheerful. Hence was made
-manifest to me the origin of the persuasion entertained by
-some who do not know what conscience is, by reason that
-they have none, when they attribute its pangs to a disordered
-state of the stomach.” Of the killing and eating the flesh
-of animals, he writes thus in the Arcana Cœlestia, n. 1002.
-“Eating the flesh of animals, considered in itself, is something
-profane; for the people of the most ancient time on
-no account ate the flesh of any beast or fowl, but only grain,
-especially bread made of wheat, also the fruits of trees,
-pulse, milk, and what is produced from milk, as butter. To<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_260"></a>[260]</span>
-kill animals and to eat their flesh, was to them unlawful, and
-seemed as something bestial; and they were content with the
-uses and services which they rendered, as appears also from
-Genesis i. 29, 30. But in succeeding times, when man began
-to grow fierce as a beast, yea fiercer, then first they began
-to kill animals, and to eat their flesh. And because man
-was such, this was permitted, and at this day also is permitted;
-and so far as man does it from conscience, so far is
-it lawful, for his conscience is formed of all those things
-which he thinks to be true, and so thinks to be lawful:
-wherefore also, at this day, no one is by any means condemned
-for this, that he eats flesh.”</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg took snuff, as was the custom in his day.
-Some of his manuscripts yet bear traces of the dingy powder.</p>
-
-<p>Shearsmith gives the same account of Swedenborg’s habits
-of sleep, as his gardener at Stockholm. He had no regard
-for times and seasons, days or nights, only taking rest as he
-felt disposed. This was naturally to be expected, considering
-the peculiarities of his seership. At first, Shearsmith
-was greatly alarmed, by reason of his talking day and night.
-Sometimes he would be writing, and then he would be, as it
-were, holding a conversation with several persons. But as
-Swedenborg spoke in a language Shearsmith did not understand,
-he could make nothing of it. Shearsmith was nevertheless
-well pleased with his lodger. His servant told Mr.
-Peckitt, after Swedenborg’s death, that “he was a good-natured
-man, and that he was a blessing to the house, for they
-had harmony and good business whilst he was with them.”
-A short time before his death, he lay for some weeks in a
-trance, without any sustenance.</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg’s pension preserved him from all pecuniary
-cares. Yet in his Diary we read: “I have now been for
-thirty-three months in a state in which my mind is withdrawn
-from bodily affairs, and hence can be present in the societies<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_261"></a>[261]</span>
-of the spiritual and celestial. Yet whenever I am intent
-upon worldly matters, or have cares and desires about
-money, (such as caused me to write a letter to-day,) I lapse
-into a bodily state; and the spirits, as they inform me, cannot
-speak with me, but say they are in a manner absent.
-This shows me that spirits cannot speak with a man who
-dwells upon worldly and bodily cares; for the things of his
-body draw down his ideas, and drown them in the body.—March 4,
-1748.” This experience is worthy of record.
-Most of us, in our own way, know the truth of it, from heart
-experience. Whatever his motives were, he would receive
-back no proceeds from the sale of his theological works, but
-dedicated the whole to religious subscriptions. To beggars
-he seldom gave anything. In his writings, he in several
-places protests against the sham charity which satisfies itself
-by mere alms-giving. He tells us that habitual beggars lead
-vicious and impious lives, and that to give them money is
-rather to curse than to bless them. Swedenborg did not lend
-money; for that, he said, is the way to lose it; besides, as he
-remarks, he required it nearly all to pay the expenses of his
-traveling and printing.</p>
-
-<p>In his later years, Swedenborg had no library but his
-Bible, in various editions, and his own manuscripts. What
-need had he of the books of men, when he knew the
-heavens,—and the glorified authors of earth, in states of
-wisdom they never dreamed of here?</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg seldom went to church; for, as he said, he
-“had no peace in the church, on account of spirits, who
-contradicted what the preacher said, especially when he
-spoke of Three Persons in the Godhead, which amounted in
-reality to three Gods.”</p>
-
-<p>Swedenborg’s long and arduous labors on earth were now
-ended. Let us approach his death-bed with reverence, and
-observe how a good man can die.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<p><span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_262"></a>[262]</span></p>
-
-<h2 class="nobreak" id="CHAPTER_XXIX">CHAPTER XXIX.</h2>
-
-<p class="c"><i>Last Days on Earth.</i></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>On Christmas eve, 1771, a stroke of apoplexy deprived
-Swedenborg of his speech, and lamed one side. He lay
-afterwards in a lethargic state for more than three weeks,
-taking no sustenance beyond a little tea without milk, and
-cold water occasionally, and once a little currant jelly. At
-the end of that time, he recovered his speech and health
-somewhat, and ate and drank as usual. Mr. Hartley and
-Dr. Messiter at this time visited him, and asking him if he
-was comforted with the society of angels, as before, he
-answered that he was. They then asked him to declare
-whether all that he had written was strictly true, or whether
-any part or parts were to be excepted. “I have written,”
-answered Swedenborg, with a degree of warmth, “nothing
-but the truth, as you will have more and more confirmed to
-you all the days of your life, provided you keep close to the
-Lord, and faithfully serve Him alone, by shunning evils
-of all kinds as sins against Him, and diligently searching
-His Word, which, from beginning to end, bears incontestable
-witness to the truth of the doctrines I have delivered to the
-world.”</p>
-
-<p>At this time Swedenborg seemed to love privacy, and saw
-but little company. His old friend, Springer, the Swedish
-Consul in London, called upon him a week or two before
-his decease. Springer asked him when he believed that the
-New Jerusalem, or the New Church of the Lord, would be<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_263"></a>[263]</span>
-manifested, and if this manifestation would take place in
-the four quarters of the world. Swedenborg replied: “No
-mortal can declare the time, no, not even the celestial
-angels; it is known solely to the Lord. Read the Revelation,
-chapter xxi. 2, and Zechariah, chapter xiv. 9, and you
-will find that it is not to be doubted that the New Jerusalem,
-mentioned in the Apocalypse, which denotes a new and
-purer state of the Christian Church, than has hitherto
-existed, will manifest itself to all the earth.”</p>
-
-<p>About this time, says Springer, Swedenborg told him that
-his spiritual sight was withdrawn, after he had been favored
-with it for so long a course of years. This, of which the
-world knew nothing, and for which it cared nothing, it was
-the greatest affliction to him to lose. He could not endure
-the blindness, but cried out repeatedly, “O my God! hast
-thou then forsaken thy servant at last?” He continued for
-several days in this condition, but it was the last of his
-trials: he recovered his precious sight, and was happy.</p>
-
-<p>About this time he wrote a note, in Latin, to the Rev.
-John Wesley, to the following effect:—</p>
-
-<div class="blockquote">
-
-<p class="right">“<span class="smcap">Great Bath Street, Cold Bath Fields</span>, <i>February, 1772</i>.</p>
-
-<p>“<span class="smcap">Sir</span>,—I have been informed, in the world of spirits, that
-you have a strong desire to converse with me. I shall be
-happy to see you, if you will favor me with a visit.</p>
-
-<p class="center">“I am, sir, your humble servant,</p>
-
-<p class="right">“<span class="smcap">Emanuel Swedenborg</span>.”</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<p>When the note was handed to Mr. Wesley, he was in
-company with some of his preachers, arranging their preaching
-circuits for the year. Wesley read the note aloud, and
-frankly confessed that he had been strongly actuated by a
-desire to meet Swedenborg, but he had revealed his wish to
-no one. He wrote for answer, that he was then occupied in
-preparing for a six months’ journey, but would wait upon<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_264"></a>[264]</span>
-Swedenborg on his return to London. Swedenborg, in reply,
-stated that the proposed visit would be too late, as he should
-go into the world of spirits on the 29th day of the next
-month, (March,) never more to return. Wesley did not
-call, and they never met. Had he been wise, he would; in
-spite of engagements, have embraced this opportunity of conversing
-with that wonderful man, after an invitation of such
-a character. Had they met, Methodism might have been a
-different thing from what it is. But let us believe that all
-such seeming accidents are overruled for the best.</p>
-
-<p>The authority for this anecdote is the Rev. Samuel Smith,
-a Methodist preacher, who was present when Wesley received
-Swedenborg’s letter. It excited his curiosity to know
-something of the writings of so remarkable a man; and the
-result was, a firm conviction of the rationality and truth of
-the heavenly doctrine promulgated in them, and a zealous
-activity in their diffusion, throughout the remainder of his
-life.</p>
-
-<p>Mr. Bergstrom, the landlord of the King’s Arms tavern
-in Wellclose square, at whose house Swedenborg had once
-lodged, called to see him in his last days. Swedenborg told
-him, that since it had pleased the Lord to take away the use
-of his arm by palsy, his body was good for nothing but to
-be put under ground. Mr. Bergstrom asked him whether
-he would receive the Sacrament. Somebody present at the
-time proposed sending for the Rev. Mr. Mathesius, a minister
-of the Swedish Church. Swedenborg at once declined
-having that gentleman, for he had sent abroad a report that
-Swedenborg was out of his senses. (Mathesius himself, in
-later years, became deranged.) The Rev. Arvid Ferelius,
-another Swedish clergyman, with whom Swedenborg was on
-the best terms, and who had visited him frequently in his
-illness, was then sent for. Ferelius observed to him, that
-“as many persons thought he had endeavored only to make<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_265"></a>[265]</span>
-himself a name, or acquire celebrity in the world, by the
-publication of his new theological system, he should now be
-ready, in order to show justice to the world, to recant either
-the whole or a part of what he had written, since he had
-now nothing more to expect from the world which he was so
-soon to leave forever.” Upon hearing these words, Swedenborg
-raised himself half upright in his bed, and placing
-his sound hand upon his breast, said, with great zeal and
-emphasis, “As true as you see me before you, so true is everything
-which I have written. I could say more, were I permitted.
-When you come into eternity, you will see all things
-as I have stated and described them; and we shall have
-much discourse about them with each other.” Ferelius then
-asked him if he would take the Lord’s Holy Supper. He
-replied, “You mean well, but I, being a member of the
-other world, do not need it. However, to show the connection
-and union between the church in heaven and the church
-on earth, I will gladly take it.” He then asked Ferelius if
-he had read his views on the Sacrament. Before administering
-the Sacrament, Ferelius inquired whether he confessed
-himself to be a sinner. “Certainly,” said Swedenborg, “so
-long as I carry about with me this sinful body.” With deep
-and affecting devotion, with folded hands, and with his head
-uncovered, he confessed his own unworthiness, and received
-the Holy Supper. He then presented Ferelius with a copy
-of his Arcana Cœlestia, expressing his gratitude to him for
-his kind attentions.</p>
-
-<p>He knew that his end was near. He told the people of
-the house on what day he should die, and Shearsmith’s
-servant remarked, “he was as pleased as I should have been,
-if I was going to have a holiday, or going to some merrymaking.”</p>
-
-<p>His faculties were clear to the last. On Sunday, the 29th
-day of March, 1772, hearing the clock strike, he asked his<span class="pagenum"><a id="Page_266"></a>[266]</span>
-landlady and her maid, who were both sitting at his bed-side,
-what o’clock it was; and upon being answered it was five
-o’clock, he said, “It is well; I thank you; God bless you;”
-and in a little moment after, he gently departed. He was
-then 84 years, 8 weeks, and five days, old.</p>
-
-<p>His body was taken to the undertaker’s, where it lay in
-state; and then was, on the 5th day of April, deposited in
-three coffins, in the vault of the Swedish Church, in Prince’s
-square, Radcliffe Highway, with all the ceremonies of the
-Lutheran faith,—the service being performed by the Rev.
-Arvid Ferelius.</p>
-
-<p>There the body still lies. No stone, or inscription marks
-the spot. Swedenborg of all men, least requires monumental
-commemoration. Every year enshrines his memory in
-increasing numbers of grateful hearts;—grateful to him, as
-a medium, whereby the Infinite Wisdom and Goodness might
-reach its end in blessing mankind by the advent of spiritual
-truth, and leading them within the gates of the Holy City,
-New Jerusalem.</p>
-
-<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop" />
-
-<div class="footnotes">
-
-<div class="chapter">
-
-<h2 class="nobreak">FOOTNOTES</h2>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="label">[1]</a> The following account of Charles XII., written by Emanuel Swedenborg,
-was printed in the “Gentleman’s Magazine,” for September, 1754.
-It is a portion of a letter which Swedenborg wrote to M. Nordberg, while
-the latter was engaged in writing his “Life of Charles XII.,” in which
-work the letter appeared at full length. It is too long to be quoted here;
-the following extracts contain the pith of it. It may be proper to observe,
-that it was written by the author prior to his being called to the sacred
-office which occupied the last twenty-nine years of his life. This accounts
-for his speaking of the celebrated Swedish hero with so much greater respect
-than he is known to have afterwards entertained for his memory.</p>
-
-<p>“Having been frequently admitted to the honor of hearing his late most
-excellent Majesty, Charles XII. discourse on mathematical subjects, I
-presume an account of a new arithmetic invented by him, may merit the
-attention of my readers.</p>
-
-<p>“His Majesty observed then, that the denary arithmetic, universally received
-and practiced, was most probably derived from the original method
-of counting on the fingers; that illiterate people of old, when they had run
-through the fingers of both hands, repeated new periods over and over
-again, and every time spread open both hands; which being done ten
-times, they distinguished each step by proper marks, as by joining two,
-three, or four fingers. Afterwards, when this method of numeration on the
-fingers came to be expressed by proper characters, it soon became firmly
-and universally established, and so the denary calculus has been retained to
-this day. But surely, were a solid geometrician, thoroughly versed in the
-abstract nature and fundamentals of numbers, to set his mind upon introducing
-a still more useful calculus into the world, instead of ten, he would
-select such a perfect square, or cube number, as by continual bisection, or
-halving, would at length terminate in unity, and be better adapted to the
-subdivisions of measures, weights, coins, etc.</p>
-
-<p>“Thus intent on a new arithmetic, the hero pitched upon the number
-eight, as most fit for the purpose, since it could not only be halved continually
-down to unity, without a fraction, but contained within it the square
-of 2, and was itself the cube thereof, and was also applicable to the received
-denomination of several sorts of weights and coins, rising to 16
-and 32, the double and quadruple of 8. Upon these first considerations,
-he was pleased to command me to draw up an essay on an octonary calculus,
-which I completed in a few days, with its application to the received
-divisions, coins, measures, and weights, a disquisition on cubes and
-squares, and a new and easy way of extracting roots, all illustrated with
-examples.</p>
-
-<p>“His Majesty having cast his eye twice or thrice over it, and observing,
-perhaps from some hints in the essay, that the denary calculus had several
-advantages not always attended to, he did not at that time seem absolutely
-to approve of the octonary: or, it is likely he might conceive, that though
-it seemed easy in theory, yet it might prove difficult to introduce it to practice.
-Be this as it may, he insisted on fixing upon some other that was
-both a cube and a square number, referrible to 8, and divisible down to
-unity by bisection. This could be no other than 64, the cube of 4, and
-square of 8, divisible down to unity without a fraction.</p>
-
-<p>“I immediately presumed to object that such a number would be too
-prolix, as it rises through a series of entirely distinct and different numbers,
-up to 64, and then again to its duplicate 4,096, and on to its triplicate
-262,144, before the fourth step commences; so that the difficulty of such a
-calculus would be incredible, not only in addition and subtraction, but to
-a still higher degree in multiplication and division; for the memory must
-necessarily retain in the multiplication table, 3,969 distinct products of the
-63 numbers of the first step multiplied into one another; whereas only 49
-are necessary in the octonary, and but 81 are required in the denary arithmetic;
-which last is difficult to be remembered and applied in practice, by
-some capacities. But the stronger my objections were, the more resolute
-was his royal mind upon attempting such a calculus.</p>
-
-<div class="poetry-container">
-<div class="poetry">
- <div class="stanza">
- <div class="verse indent0">Obstructions made him eagerly aspire</div>
- <div class="verse indent0">All to surmount, and nobly soar the higher.</div>
- </div>
-</div>
-</div>
-
-<p class="noindent">He insisted that the alleged difficulties might be overbalanced by very
-many advantages.</p>
-
-<p>“A few days after this I was called before his Majesty, who, resuming
-the subject, demanded if I had made a trial. I still urging my former objections,
-he reached me a paper written with his own hand, in new characters
-and terms of denomination, the perusal of which, he was pleased, at
-my entreaty, to grant me; wherein, to my great surprise, I found not only
-new characters and numbers, (the one almost naturally expressive of the
-other) in a continued series to 64, so ranged as easily to be remembered,
-but also new denominations, so contrived by pairs, as to be easily extended
-to myriads by a continued variation of the character and denomination.
-And further casting my eye on several new methods of his for addition and
-multiplication by this calculus, either artificially contrived, or else inherent
-in the characters of the numbers themselves, I was struck with the
-profoundest admiration of the force of his Majesty’s genius, and with
-such strange amazement, as obliged me to esteem this eminent personage,
-not my rival, but by far my superior in my own art. And having the
-original still in my custody, at a proper time I may publish it, as it highly
-deserves; whereby it will appear with what discerning skill he was endowed,
-or how deeply he penetrated into the obscurest recesses of the
-arithmetical science.</p>
-
-<p>“Besides, his eminent talents in calculation further appear by his frequently
-working and solving the most difficult numerical problems, barely
-by thought and memory; in which operations others are obliged to take
-great pains and tedious labor.</p>
-
-<p>“Having duly weighed the vast advantages arising from mathematical
-and arithmetical knowledge in most occasions of human life, he frequently
-used it as an adage, that <i>he who is ignorant of numbers is scarce half a
-man</i>.</p>
-
-<p>“While he was at Bender, he composed a complete volume of military
-exercises, highly esteemed by those who are best skilled in the art of
-war.”</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="label">[2]</a> The bookseller referred to was Mr. Bohn, of Henrietta street, Covent
-Garden.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="label">[3]</a> It is not to be supposed that this time was wasted in sleep. In his
-meditations and spiritual intercourse, he, no doubt, loved the seclusion
-of his quiet chamber.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<div class="footnote">
-
-<p><a id="Footnote_4" href="#FNanchor_4" class="label">[4]</a> This is quite a mistake. His work he had in contemplation for some
-years. It is probable the revisal, alterations, and additions in the MS
-and in the proofs, led Paulus into this misconception.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin-top:4em'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LIFE OF EMANUEL SWEDENBORG ***</div>
-<div style='text-align:left'>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Updated editions will replace the previous one&#8212;the old editions will
-be renamed.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG&#8482;
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
-the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
-of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
-copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
-easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
-of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
-Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away&#8212;you may
-do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
-by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
-license, especially commercial redistribution.
-</div>
-
-<div style='margin-top:1em; font-size:1.1em; text-align:center'>START: FULL LICENSE</div>
-<div style='text-align:center;font-size:0.9em'>THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE</div>
-<div style='text-align:center;font-size:0.9em'>PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-To protect the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase &#8220;Project
-Gutenberg&#8221;), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
-or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.B. &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (&#8220;the
-Foundation&#8221; or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg&#8482; work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country other than the United States.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work (any work
-on which the phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; appears, or with which the
-phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-</div>
-
-<blockquote>
- <div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
- other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
- whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
- of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
- at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
- are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
- of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
- </div>
-</blockquote>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase &#8220;Project
-Gutenberg&#8221; associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg&#8482; License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg&#8482;.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; License.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work in a format
-other than &#8220;Plain Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg&#8482; website
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original &#8220;Plain
-Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg&#8482; works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-provided that:
-</div>
-
-<div style='margin-left:0.7em;'>
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, &#8220;Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation.&#8221;
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
- works.
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
- </div>
-
- <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
- &#8226; You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works.
- </div>
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
-the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
-forth in Section 3 below.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain &#8220;Defects,&#8221; such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the &#8220;Right
-of Replacement or Refund&#8221; described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you &#8216;AS-IS&#8217;, WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg&#8482;&#8217;s
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg&#8482; collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg&#8482; and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation&#8217;s EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state&#8217;s laws.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Foundation&#8217;s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
-Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
-to date contact information can be found at the Foundation&#8217;s website
-and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
-public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
-visit <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a>.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg&#8482; concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
-facility: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>.
-</div>
-
-<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
-This website includes information about Project Gutenberg&#8482;,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-</div>
-
-</div>
-</body>
-</html>
diff --git a/old/67821-h/images/cover.jpg b/old/67821-h/images/cover.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index a7c6c40..0000000
--- a/old/67821-h/images/cover.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/old/67821-h/images/tp.jpg b/old/67821-h/images/tp.jpg
deleted file mode 100644
index 15a6e2a..0000000
--- a/old/67821-h/images/tp.jpg
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ