summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/vstc10h.htm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:28:58 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:28:58 -0700
commitf6ea34af8d2e90db5ae2aa13e5da5226a1892e9e (patch)
tree3395f450334277dc2f117fbfa7fbb0c61889202a /old/vstc10h.htm
initial commit of ebook 7116HEADmain
Diffstat (limited to 'old/vstc10h.htm')
-rw-r--r--old/vstc10h.htm7589
1 files changed, 7589 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/vstc10h.htm b/old/vstc10h.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d41dd1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/vstc10h.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,7589 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html
+ PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" />
+<title>Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation</title>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h2>
+<a href="#startoftext">Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, by Robert Chambers</a>
+</h2>
+<pre>
+The Project Gutenberg EBook of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation
+by Robert Chambers
+
+Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the
+copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing
+this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook.
+
+This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project
+Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the
+header without written permission.
+
+Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the
+eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is
+important information about your specific rights and restrictions in
+how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a
+donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved.
+
+
+**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts**
+
+**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971**
+
+*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!*****
+
+
+Title: Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation
+
+Author: Robert Chambers
+
+Release Date: December, 2004 [EBook #7116]
+[This file was first posted on March 11, 2003]
+
+Edition: 10
+
+Language: English
+
+Character set encoding: ASCII
+</pre>
+<p><a name="startoftext"></a></p>
+<p>Transcribed by David Price, email ccx074@coventry.ac.uk, from the
+1844 John Churchill edition.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines3"><br /><br /><br /></div>
+<h1>VESTIGES OF THE NATURAL HISTORY OF CREATION</h1>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines3"><br /><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>THE BODIES OF SPACE, THEIR ARRANGEMENTS AND FORMATION.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>It is familiar knowledge that the earth which we inhabit is a globe
+of somewhat less than 8000 miles in diameter, being one of a series
+of eleven which revolve at different distances around the sun, and some
+of which have satellites in like manner revolving around them.&nbsp;
+The sun, planets, and satellites, with the less intelligible orbs termed
+comets, are comprehensively called the solar system, and if we take
+as the uttermost bounds of this system the orbit of Uranus (though the
+comets actually have a wider range), we shall find that it occupies
+a portion of space not less than three thousand six hundred millions
+of miles in extent.&nbsp; The mind fails to form an exact notion of
+a portion of space so immense; but some faint idea of it may be obtained
+from the fact, that, if the swiftest race-horse ever known had begun
+to traverse it, at full speed, at the time of the birth of Moses, he
+would only as yet have accomplished half his journey.</p>
+<p>It has long been concluded amongst astronomers, that the stars, though
+they only appear to our eyes as brilliant points, are all to be considered
+as suns, representing so many solar systems, each bearing a general
+resemblance to our own.&nbsp; The stars have a brilliancy and apparent
+magnitude which we may safely presume to be in proportion to their actual
+size and the distance at which they are placed from us.&nbsp; Attempts
+have been made to ascertain the distance of some of the stars by calculations
+founded on parallax, it being previously understood that, if a parallax
+of so much as one second, or the 3600th of a degree, could be ascertained
+in any one instance, the distance might be assumed in that instance
+as not less than 19,200 millions of miles!&nbsp; In the case of the
+most brilliant star, Sirius, even this minute parallax could not be
+found; from which of course it was to be inferred that the distance
+of that star is something beyond the vast distance which has been stated.&nbsp;
+In some others, on which the experiment has been tried, no sensible
+parallax could be detected; from which the same inference was to be
+made in their case.&nbsp; But a sensible parallax of about one second
+has been ascertained in the case of the double star, &alpha; &alpha;
+, of the constellation of the Centaur, <a name="citation3"></a><a href="#footnote3">{3}</a>
+and one of the third of that amount for the double star, 61 Cygni; which
+gave reason to presume that the distance of the former might be about
+twenty thousand millions of miles, and the latter of much greater amount.&nbsp;
+If we suppose that similar intervals exist between all the stars, we
+shall readily see that the space occupied by even the comparatively
+small number visible to the naked eye, must be vast beyond all powers
+of conception.</p>
+<p>The number visible to the eye is about three thousand; but when a
+telescope of small power is directed to the heavens, a great number
+more come into view, and the number is ever increased in proportion
+to the increased power of the instrument.&nbsp; In one place, where
+they are more thickly sown than elsewhere, Sir William Herschel reckoned
+that fifty thousand passed over a field of view two degrees in breadth
+in a single hour.&nbsp; It was first surmised by the ancient philosopher,
+Democritus, that the faintly white zone which spans the sky under the
+name of the Milky Way, might be only a dense collection of stars too
+remote to be distinguished.&nbsp; This conjecture has been verified
+by the instruments of modern astronomers, and some speculations of a
+most remarkable kind have been formed in connexion with it.&nbsp; By
+the joint labours of the two Herschels, the sky has been &ldquo;gauged&rdquo;
+in all directions by the telescope, so as to ascertain the conditions
+of different parts with respect to the frequency of the stars.&nbsp;
+The result has been a conviction that, as the planets are parts of solar
+systems, so are solar systems parts of what may be called astral systems
+- that is, systems composed of a multitude of stars, bearing a certain
+relation to each other.&nbsp; The astral system to which we belong,
+is conceived to be of an oblong, flattish form, with a space wholly
+or comparatively vacant in the centre, while the extremity in one direction
+parts into two.&nbsp; The stars are most thickly sown in the outer parts
+of this vast ring, and these constitute the Milky Way.&nbsp; Our sun
+is believed to be placed in the southern portion of the ring, near its
+inner edge, so that we are presented with many more stars, and see the
+Milky Way much more clearly, in that direction, than towards the north,
+in which line our eye has to traverse the vacant central space.&nbsp;
+Nor is this all.&nbsp; Sir William Herschel, so early as 1783, detected
+a motion in our solar system with respect to the stars, and announced
+that it was tending towards the star &lambda;, in the constellation
+Hercules.&nbsp; This has been generally verified by recent and more
+exact calculations, <a name="citation5"></a><a href="#footnote5">{5}</a>
+which fix on a point in Hercules, near the star 143 of the 17th hour,
+according to Piozzi&rsquo;s catalogue, as that towards which our sun
+is proceeding.&nbsp; It is, therefore, receding from the inner edge
+of the ring.&nbsp; Motions of this kind, through such vast regions of
+space, must be long in producing any change sensible to the inhabitants
+of our planet, and it is not easy to grasp their general character;
+but grounds have nevertheless been found for supposing that not only
+our sun, but the other suns of the system pursue a wavy course round
+the ring <i>from west to east</i>, crossing and recrossing the middle
+of the annular circle.&nbsp; &ldquo;Some stars will depart more, others
+less, from either side of the circumference of equilibrium, according
+to the places in which they are situated, and according to the direction
+and the velocity with which they are put in motion.&nbsp; Our sun is
+probably one of those which depart furthest from it, and descend furthest
+into the empty space within the ring.&rdquo; <a name="citation6"></a><a href="#footnote6">{6}</a>&nbsp;
+According to this view, a time may come when we shall be much more in
+the thick of the stars of our astral system than we are now, and have
+of course much more brilliant nocturnal skies; but it may be countless
+ages before the eyes which are to see this added resplendence shall
+exist.</p>
+<p>The evidence of the existence of other astral systems besides our
+own is much more decided than might be expected, when we consider that
+the nearest of them must needs be placed at a mighty interval beyond
+our own.&nbsp; The elder Herschel, directing his wonderful tube towards
+the <i>sides</i> of our system, where stars are planted most rarely,
+and raising the powers of the instrument to the required pitch, was
+enabled with awe-struck mind to see suspended in the vast empyrean astral
+systems, or, as he called them, firmaments, resembling our own.&nbsp;
+Like light cloudlets to a certain power of the telescope, they resolved
+themselves, under a greater power, into stars, though these generally
+seemed no larger than the finest particles of diamond dust.&nbsp; The
+general forms of these systems are various; but one at least has been
+detected as bearing a striking resemblance to the supposed form of our
+own.&nbsp; The distances are also various, as proved by the different
+degrees of telescopic power necessary to bring them into view.&nbsp;
+The farthest observed by the astronomer were estimated by him as thirty-five
+thousand times more remote than Sirius, supposing its distance to be
+about twenty thousand millions of miles.&nbsp; It would thus appear,
+that not only does gravitation keep our earth in its place in the solar
+system, and the solar system in its place in our astral system, but
+it also may be presumed to have the mightier duty of preserving a local
+arrangement between that astral system and an immensity of others, through
+which the imagination is left to wander on and on without limit or stay,
+save that which is given by its inability to grasp the unbounded.</p>
+<p>The two Herschels have in succession made some other most remarkable
+observations on the regions of space.&nbsp; They have found within the
+limits of our astral system, and generally in its outer fields, a great
+number of objects which, from their foggy appearance, are called <i>nebul&aelig;</i>;
+some of vast extent and irregular figure, as that in the sword of Orion,
+which is visible to the naked eye; others of shape more defined; others,
+again, in which small bright nuclei appear here and there over the surface.&nbsp;
+Between this last form and another class of objects, which appear as
+clusters of nuclei with nebulous matter around each nucleus, there is
+but a step in what appears a chain of related things.&nbsp; Then, again,
+our astral space shews what are called nebulous stars, - namely, luminous
+spherical objects, bright in the centre and dull towards the extremities.&nbsp;
+These appear to be only an advanced condition of the class of objects
+above described.&nbsp; Finally, nebulous stars exist in every stage
+of concentration, down to that state in which we see only a common star
+with a slight <i>bur</i> around it.&nbsp; It may be presumed that all
+these are but stages in a progress, just as if, seeing a child, a boy,
+a youth, a middle-aged, and an old man together, we might presume that
+the whole were only variations of one being.&nbsp; Are we to suppose
+that we have got a glimpse of the process through which a sun goes between
+its original condition, as a mass of diffused nebulous matter, and its
+full-formed state as a compact body?&nbsp; We shall see how far such
+an idea is supported by other things known with regard to the occupants
+of space, and the laws of matter.</p>
+<p>A superficial view of the astronomy of the solar system gives us
+only the idea of a vast luminous body (the sun) in the centre, and a
+few smaller, though various sized bodies, revolving at different distances
+around it; some of these, again, having smaller planets (satellites)
+revolving around them.&nbsp; There are, however, some general features
+of the solar system, which, when a profounder attention makes us acquainted
+with them, strike the mind very forcibly.</p>
+<p>It is, in the first place, remarkable, that the planets all move
+nearly <i>in one plane</i>, corresponding with the centre of the sun&rsquo;s
+body.&nbsp; Next, it is not less remarkable that the motion of the sun
+on its axis, those of the planets around the sun, and the satellites
+around their primaries, <a name="citation9"></a><a href="#footnote9">{9}</a>
+and the motions of all on their axes, are <i>in one direction</i> -
+namely, from west to east.&nbsp; Had all these matters been left to
+accident, the chances against the uniformity which we find would have
+been, though calculable, inconceivably great.&nbsp; Laplace states them
+at four millions of millions to one.&nbsp; It is thus powerfully impressed
+on us, that the uniformity of the motions, as well as their general
+adjustment to one plane, must have been a consequence of some cause
+acting throughout the whole system.</p>
+<p>Some of the other relations of the bodies are not less remarkable.&nbsp;
+The primary planets shew a progressive increase of bulk and diminution
+of density, from the one nearest to the sun to that which is most distant.&nbsp;
+With respect to density alone, we find, taking water as a measure and
+counting it as one, that Saturn is 13/32, or less than half; Jupiter,
+1 1/24; Mars, 3 2/7; Earth, 4 1/2; Venus, 5 11/15; Mercury 9 9/10, or
+about the weight of lead.&nbsp; Then the distances are curiously relative.&nbsp;
+It has been found that if we place the following line of numbers, -</p>
+<p>0 3 6 12 24 48 96 192,</p>
+<p>and add 4 to each, we shall have a series denoting the respective
+distances of the planets from the sun.&nbsp; It will stand thus -</p>
+<pre>4&nbsp; &nbsp; 7&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 10&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 16&nbsp; &nbsp; 28 52&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 100&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 196
+Merc. Venus.&nbsp; Earth.&nbsp; Mars.&nbsp; &nbsp; Jupiter.&nbsp; Saturn.&nbsp; Uranus.</pre>
+<p>It will be observed that the first row of figures goes on from the
+second on the left hand in a succession of duplications, or multiplications
+by 2.&nbsp; Surely there is here a most surprising proof of the unity
+which I am claiming for the solar system.&nbsp; It was remarked when
+this curious relation was first detected, that there was a want of a
+planet corresponding to 28; the difficulty was afterwards considered
+as in a great measure overcome, by the discovery of four small planets
+revolving at nearly one mean distance from the sun, between Mars and
+Jupiter.&nbsp; The distances bear an equally interesting mathematical
+relation to the times of the revolutions round the sun.&nbsp; It has
+been found that, with respect to any two planets, the squares of the
+times of revolution are to each other in the same proportion as the
+cubes of their mean distances, - a most surprising result, for the discovery
+of which the world was indebted to the illustrious Kepler.&nbsp; Sir
+John Herschel truly observes - &ldquo;When we contemplate the constituents
+of the planetary system from the point of view which this relation affords
+us, it is no longer mere analogy which strikes us, no longer a general
+resemblance among them, as individuals independent of each other, and
+circulating about the sun, each according to its own peculiar nature,
+and connected with it by its own peculiar tie.&nbsp; The resemblance
+is now perceived to be a true <i>family likeness</i>; they are bound
+up in one chain - interwoven in one web of mutual relation and harmonious
+agreement, subjected to one pervading influence which extends from the
+centre to the farthest limits of that great system, of which all of
+them, the Earth included, must henceforth be regarded as members.&rdquo;
+<a name="citation12"></a><a href="#footnote12">{12}</a></p>
+<p>Connecting what has been observed of the series of nebulous stars
+with this wonderful relationship seen to exist among the constituents
+of our system, and further taking advantage of the light afforded by
+the ascertained laws of matter, modern astronomers have suggested the
+following hypothesis of the formation of that system.</p>
+<p>Of nebulous matter in its original state we know too little to enable
+us to suggest how nuclei should be established in it.&nbsp; But, supposing
+that, from a peculiarity in its constitution, nuclei are formed, we
+know very well how, by virtue of the law of gravitation, the process
+of an aggregation of the neighbouring matter to those nuclei should
+proceed, until masses more or less solid should become detached from
+the rest.&nbsp; It is a well-known law in physics that, when fluid matter
+collects towards or meets in a centre, it establishes a rotatory motion.&nbsp;
+See minor results of this law in the whirlwind and the whirlpool - nay,
+on so humble a scale as the water sinking through the aperture of a
+funnel.&nbsp; It thus becomes certain that when we arrive at the stage
+of a nebulous star, we have a rotation on an axis commenced.</p>
+<p>Now, mechanical philosophy informs us that, the instant a mass begins
+to rotate, there is generated a tendency to fling off its outer portions
+- in other words, the law of centrifugal force begins to operate.&nbsp;
+There are, then, two forces acting in opposition to each other, the
+one attracting <i>to</i>, the other throwing <i>from</i>, the centre.&nbsp;
+While these remain exactly counterpoised, the mass necessarily continues
+entire; but the least excess of the centrifugal over the attractive
+force would be attended with the effect of separating the mass and its
+outer parts.&nbsp; These outer parts would, then, be left as a ring
+round the central body, which ring would continue to revolve with the
+velocity possessed by the central mass at the moment of separation,
+but not necessarily participating in any changes afterwards undergone
+by that body.&nbsp; This is a process which might be repeated as soon
+as a new excess arose in the centrifugal over the attractive forces
+working in the parent mass.&nbsp; It might, indeed, continue to be repeated,
+until the mass attained the ultimate limits of the condensation which
+its constitution imposed upon it.&nbsp; From what cause might arise
+the periodical occurrence of an excess of the centrifugal force?&nbsp;
+If we suppose the agglomeration of a nebulous mass to be a process attended
+by refrigeration or cooling, which many facts render likely, we can
+easily understand why the outer parts, hardening under this process,
+might, by virtue of the greater solidity thence acquired, begin to present
+some resistance to the attractive force.&nbsp; As the solidification
+proceeded, this resistance would become greater, though there would
+still be a tendency to adhere.&nbsp; Meanwhile, the condensation of
+the central mass would be going on, tending to produce a separation
+from what may now be termed the <i>solidifying crust</i>.&nbsp; During
+the contention between the attractions of these two bodies, or parts
+of one body, there would probably be a ring of attenuation between the
+mass and its crust.&nbsp; At length, when the central mass had reached
+a certain stage in its advance towards solidification, a separation
+would take place, and the crust would become a detached ring.&nbsp;
+It is clear, of course, that some law presiding over the refrigeration
+of heated gaseous bodies would determine the stages at which rings were
+thus formed and detached.&nbsp; We do not know any such law, but what
+we have seen assures us it is one observing and reducible to mathematical
+formul&aelig;.</p>
+<p>If these rings consisted of matter nearly uniform throughout, they
+would probably continue each in its original form; but there are many
+chances against their being uniform in constitution.&nbsp; The unavoidable
+effects of irregularity in their constitution would be to cause them
+to gather towards centres of superior solidity, by which the annular
+form would, of course, be destroyed.&nbsp; The ring would, in short,
+break into several masses, the largest of which would be likely to attract
+the lesser into itself.&nbsp; The whole mass would then necessarily
+settle into a spherical form by virtue of the law of gravitation; in
+short, would then become a planet revolving round the sun.&nbsp; Its
+rotatory motion would, of course, continue, and satellites might then
+be thrown off in turn from its body in exactly the same way as the primary
+planets had been thrown off from the sun.&nbsp; The rule, if I can be
+allowed so to call it, receives a striking support from what appear
+to be its exceptions.&nbsp; While there are many chances against the
+matter of the rings being sufficiently equable to remain in the annular
+form till they were consolidated, it might nevertheless be otherwise
+in some instances; that is to say, the equableness might, in those instances,
+be sufficiently great.&nbsp; Such was probably the case with the two
+rings around the body of Saturn, which remain a living picture of the
+arrangement, if not the condition, in which all the planetary masses
+at one time stood.&nbsp; It may also be admitted that, when a ring broke
+up, it was possible that the fragments might spherify separately.&nbsp;
+Such seems to be the actual history of the ring between Jupiter and
+Mars, in whose place we now find four planets much beneath the smallest
+of the rest in size, and moving nearly at the same distance from the
+sun, though in orbits so elliptical, and of such different planes, that
+they keep apart.</p>
+<p>It has been seen that there are mathematical proportions in the relative
+distances and revolutions of the planets of our system.&nbsp; It has
+also been suggested that the periods in the condensation of the nebulous
+mass, at which rings were disengaged, must have depended on some particular
+crises in the condition of that mass, in connexion with the laws of
+centrifugal force and attraction.&nbsp; M. Compte, of Paris, has made
+some approach to the verification of the hypothesis, by calculating
+what ought to have been the rotation of the solar mass at the successive
+times when its surface extended to the various planetary orbits.&nbsp;
+He ascertained that <i>that rotation corresponded in every case with
+the actual sidereal revolution of the planets</i>, <i>and that the rotation
+of the primary planets in like manner corresponded with the orbitual
+periods of the secondaries</i>.&nbsp; The process by which he arrived
+at this conclusion is not to be readily comprehended by the unlearned;
+but those who are otherwise, allow that it is a powerful support to
+the present hypothesis of the formation of the globes of space. <a name="citation17"></a><a href="#footnote17">{17}</a></p>
+<p>The nebular hypothesis, as it has been called, obtains a remarkable
+support in what would at first seem to militate against it - the existence
+in our firmament of several thousands of solar systems, in which there
+are more than one sun.&nbsp; These are called double and triple stars.&nbsp;
+Some double stars, upon which careful observations have been made, are
+found to have a regular revolutionary motion round each other in ellipses.&nbsp;
+This kind of solar system has also been observed in what appears to
+be its rudimental state, for there are examples of nebulous stars containing
+two and three nuclei in near association.&nbsp; At a certain point in
+the confluence of the matter of these nebulous stars, they would all
+become involved in a common revolutionary motion, linked inextricably
+with each other, though it might be at sufficient distances to allow
+of each distinct centre having afterwards its attendant planets.&nbsp;
+We have seen that the law which causes rotation in the single solar
+masses, is exactly the same which produces the familiar phenomenon of
+a small whirlpool or dimple in the surface of a stream.&nbsp; Such dimples
+are not always single.&nbsp; Upon the face of a river where there are
+various contending currents, it may often be observed that two or more
+dimples are formed near each other with more or less regularity.&nbsp;
+These fantastic eddies, which the musing poet will sometimes watch abstractedly
+for an hour, little thinking of the law which produces and connects
+them, are an illustration of the wonders of binary and ternary solar
+systems.</p>
+<p>The nebular hypothesis is, indeed, supported by so many ascertained
+features of the celestial scenery, and by so many calculations of exact
+science, that it is impossible for a candid mind to refrain from giving
+it a cordial reception, if not to repose full reliance upon it, even
+without seeking for it support of any other kind.&nbsp; Some other support
+I trust yet to bring to it; but in the meantime, assuming its truth,
+let us see what idea it gives of the constitution of what we term the
+universe, of the development of its various parts, and of its original
+condition.</p>
+<p>Reverting to a former illustration - if we could suppose a number
+of persons of various ages presented to the inspection of an intelligent
+being newly introduced into the world, we cannot doubt that he would
+soon become convinced that men had once been boys, that boys had once
+been infants, and, finally, that all had been brought into the world
+in exactly the same circumstances.&nbsp; Precisely thus, seeing in our
+astral system many thousands of worlds in all stages of formation, from
+the most rudimental to that immediately preceding the present condition
+of those we deem perfect, it is unavoidable to conclude that all the
+perfect have gone through the various stages which we see in the rudimental.&nbsp;
+This leads us at once to the conclusion that the whole of our firmament
+was at one time a diffused mass of nebulous matter, extending through
+the space which it still occupies.&nbsp; So also, of course, must have
+been the other astral systems.&nbsp; Indeed, we must presume the whole
+to have been originally in one connected mass, the astral systems being
+only the first division into parts, and solar systems the second.</p>
+<p>The first idea which all this impresses upon us is, that the formation
+of bodies in space is <i>still and at present in progress</i>.&nbsp;
+We live at a time when many have been formed, and many are still forming.&nbsp;
+Our own solar system is to be regarded as completed, supposing its perfection
+to consist in the formation of a series of planets, for there are mathematical
+reasons for concluding that Mercury is the nearest planet to the sun,
+which can, according to the laws of the system, exist.&nbsp; But there
+are other solar systems within our astral system, which are as yet in
+a less advanced state, and even some quantities of nebulous matter which
+have scarcely begun to advance towards the stellar form.&nbsp; On the
+other hand, there are vast numbers of stars which have all the appearance
+of being fully formed systems, if we are to judge from the complete
+and definite appearance which they present to our vision through the
+telescope.&nbsp; We have no means of judging of the seniority of systems;
+but it is reasonable to suppose that, among the many, some are older
+than ours.&nbsp; There is, indeed, one piece of evidence for the probability
+of the comparative youth of our system, altogether apart from human
+traditions and the geognostic appearances of the surface of our planet.&nbsp;
+This consists in a thin nebulous matter, which is diffused around the
+sun to nearly the orbit of Mercury, of a very oblately spheroidal shape.&nbsp;
+This matter, which sometimes appears to our naked eyes, at sunset, in
+the form of a cone projecting upwards in the line of the sun&rsquo;s
+path, and which bears the name of the Zodiacal Light, has been thought
+a residuum or last remnant of the concentrating matter of our system,
+and thus may be supposed to indicate the comparative recentness of the
+principal events of our cosmogony.&nbsp; Supposing the surmise and inference
+to be correct, and they may be held as so far supported by more familiar
+evidence, we might with the more confidence speak of our system as not
+amongst the elder born of Heaven, but one whose various phenomena, physical
+and moral, as yet lay undeveloped, while myriads of others were fully
+fashioned and in complete arrangement.&nbsp; Thus, in the sublime chronology
+to which we are directing our inquiries, we first find ourselves called
+upon to consider the globe which we inhabit as a child of the sun, elder
+than Venus and her younger brother Mercury, but posterior in date of
+birth to Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus; next to regard our whole
+system as probably of recent formation in comparison with many of the
+stars of our firmament.&nbsp; We must, however, be on our guard against
+supposing the earth as a recent globe in our ordinary conceptions of
+time.&nbsp; From evidence afterwards to be adduced, it will be seen
+that it cannot be presumed to be less than many hundreds of centuries
+old.&nbsp; How much older Uranus may be no one can tell, much less how
+more aged may be many of the stars of our firmament, or the stars of
+other firmaments than ours.</p>
+<p>Another and more important consideration arises from the hypothesis;
+namely, as to the means by which the grand process is conducted.&nbsp;
+The nebulous matter collects around nuclei by virtue of the law of attraction.&nbsp;
+The agglomeration brings into operation another physical law, by force
+of which the separate masses of matter are either made to rotate singly,
+or, in addition to that single motion, are set into a coupled revolution
+in ellipses.&nbsp; Next centrifugal force comes into play, flinging
+off portions of the rotating masses, which become spheres by virtue
+of the same law of attraction, and are held in orbits of revolution
+round the central body by means of a composition between the centrifugal
+and gravitating forces.&nbsp; All, we see, is done by certain laws of
+matter, so that it becomes a question of extreme interest, what are
+such laws?&nbsp; All that can yet be said, in answer, is, that we see
+certain natural events proceeding in an invariable order under certain
+conditions, and thence infer the existence of some fundamental arrangement
+which, for the bringing about of these events, has a force and certainty
+of action similar to, but more precise and unerring than those arrangements
+which human society makes for its own benefit, and calls laws.&nbsp;
+It is remarkable of physical laws, that we see them operating on every
+kind of scale as to magnitude, with the same regularity and perseverance.&nbsp;
+The tear that falls from childhood&rsquo;s cheek is globular, through
+the efficacy of that same law of mutual attraction of particles which
+made the sun and planets round.&nbsp; The rapidity of Mercury is quicker
+than that of Saturn, for the same reason that, when we wheel a ball
+round by a string and make the string wind up round our fingers, the
+ball always flies quicker and quicker as the string is shortened.&nbsp;
+Two eddies in a stream, as has been stated, fall into a mutual revolution
+at the distance of a couple of inches, through the same cause which
+makes a pair of suns link in mutual revolution at the distance of millions
+of miles.&nbsp; There is, we might say, a sublime simplicity in this
+indifference of the grand regulations to the vastness or minuteness
+of the field of their operation.&nbsp; Their being uniform, too, throughout
+space, as far as we can scan it, and their being so unfailing in their
+tendency to operate, so that only the proper conditions are presented,
+afford to our minds matter for the gravest consideration.&nbsp; Nor
+should it escape our careful notice that the regulations on which all
+the laws of matter operate, are established on a rigidly accurate mathematical
+basis.&nbsp; Proportions of numbers and geometrical figures rest at
+the bottom of the whole.&nbsp; All these considerations, when the mind
+is thoroughly prepared for them, tend to raise our ideas with respect
+to the character of physical laws, even though we do not go a single
+step further in the investigation.&nbsp; But it is impossible for an
+intelligent mind to stop there.&nbsp; We advance from law to the cause
+of law, and ask, What is that?&nbsp; Whence have come all these beautiful
+regulations?&nbsp; Here science leaves us, but only to conclude, from
+other grounds, that there is a First Cause to which all others are secondary
+and ministrative, a primitive almighty will, of which these laws are
+merely the mandates.&nbsp; That great Being, who shall say where is
+his dwelling-place, or what his history!&nbsp; Man pauses breathless
+at the contemplation of a subject so much above his finite faculties,
+and only can wonder and adore!</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>CONSTITUENT MATERIALS OF THE EARTH AND OF THE OTHER BODIES OF SPACE.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>The nebular hypothesis almost necessarily supposes matter to have
+originally formed one mass.&nbsp; We have seen that the same physical
+laws preside over the whole.&nbsp; Are we also to presume that the constitution
+of the whole was uniform? - that is to say, that the whole consisted
+of similar elements.&nbsp; It seems difficult to avoid coming to this
+conclusion, at least under the qualification that, possibly, various
+bodies, under peculiar circumstances attending their formation, may
+contain elements which are wanting, and lack some which are present
+in others, or that some may entirely consist of elements in which others
+are entirely deficient.</p>
+<p>What are elements?&nbsp; This is a term applied by the chemist to
+a certain limited number of substances, (fifty-four or fifty-five are
+ascertained,) which, in their combinations, form all the matters of
+every kind present in and about our globe.&nbsp; They are called elements,
+or simple substances, because it has hitherto been found impossible
+to reduce them into others, wherefore they are presumed to be the primary
+bases of all matters.&nbsp; It has, indeed, been surmised that these
+so-called elements are only modifications of a primordial form of matter,
+brought about under certain conditions; but if this should prove to
+be the case, it would little affect the view which we are taking of
+cosmical arrangements.&nbsp; Analogy would lead us to conclude that
+the combinations of the primordial matter, forming our so-called elements,
+are as universal or as liable to take place everywhere as are the laws
+of gravitation and centrifugal force.&nbsp; We must therefore presume
+that the gases, the metals, the earths, and other simple substances,
+(besides whatever more of which we have no acquaintance,) exist or are
+liable to come into existence under proper conditions, as well in the
+astral system, which is thirty-five thousand times more distant than
+Sirius, as within the bounds of our own solar system or our own globe.</p>
+<p>Matter, whether it consist of about fifty-five ingredients, or only
+one, is liable to infinite varieties of condition under different circumstances,
+or, to speak more philosophically, under different laws.&nbsp; As a
+familiar illustration, water, when subjected to a temperature under
+32&deg; Fahrenheit, becomes ice; raise the temperature to 212&deg;,
+and it becomes steam, occupying a vast deal more space than it formerly
+did.&nbsp; The gases, when subjected to pressure, become liquids; for
+example, carbonic acid gas, when subjected to a weight equal to a column
+of water 1230 feet high, at a temperature of 32&deg;, takes this form:
+the other gases require various amounts of pressure for this transformation,
+but all appear to be liable to it when the pressure proper in each case
+is administered.&nbsp; Heat is a power greatly concerned in regulating
+the volume and other conditions of matter.&nbsp; A chemist can reckon
+with considerable precision what additional amount of heat would be
+required to vaporise all the water of our globe; how much more to disengage
+the oxygen which is diffused in nearly a proportion of one-half throughout
+its solids; and, finally, how much more would be required to cause the
+whole to become vaporiform, which we may consider as equivalent to its
+being restored to its original nebulous state.&nbsp; He can calculate
+with equal certainty what would be the effect of a considerable diminution
+of the earth&rsquo;s temperature - what changes would take place in
+each of its component substances, and how much the whole would shrink
+in bulk.</p>
+<p>The earth and all its various substances have at present a certain
+volume in consequence of the temperature which actually exists.&nbsp;
+When, then, we find that its matter and that of the associate planets
+was at one time diffused throughout the whole space, now circumscribed
+by the orbit of Uranus, we cannot doubt, after what we know of the power
+of heat, that the nebulous form of matter was attended by the condition
+of a very high temperature.&nbsp; The nebulous matter of space, previously
+to the formation of stellar and planetary bodies, must have been a universal
+Fire Mist, an idea which we can scarcely comprehend, though the reasons
+for arriving at it seem irresistible.&nbsp; The formation of systems
+out of this matter implies a change of some kind with regard to the
+condition of the heat.&nbsp; Had this power continued to act with its
+full original repulsive energy, the process of agglomeration by attraction
+could not have gone on.&nbsp; We do not know enough of the laws of heat
+to enable us to surmise how the necessary change in this respect was
+brought about, but we can trace some of the steps and consequences of
+the process.&nbsp; Uranus would be formed at the time when the heat
+of our system&rsquo;s matter was at the greatest, Saturn at the next,
+and so on.&nbsp; Now this tallies perfectly with the exceeding diffuseness
+of the matter of those elder planets, Saturn being not more dense or
+heavy than the substance cork.&nbsp; It may be that a sufficiency of
+heat still remains in those planets to make up for their distance from
+the sun, and the consequent smallness of the heat which they derive
+from his rays.&nbsp; And it may equally be, since Mercury is twice the
+density of the earth, that its matter exists under a degree of cold
+for which that planet&rsquo;s large enjoyment of the sun&rsquo;s rays
+is no more than a compensation.&nbsp; Thus there may be upon the whole
+a nearly equal experience of heat amongst all these children of the
+sun.&nbsp; Where, meanwhile, is the heat once diffused through the system
+over and above what remains in the planets?&nbsp; May we not rationally
+presume it to have gone to constitute that luminous envelope of the
+sun, in which his warmth-giving power is now held to reside?&nbsp; It
+could not be destroyed - it cannot be supposed to have gone off into
+space - it must have simply been reserved to constitute, at the last,
+a means of sustaining the many operations of which the planets were
+destined to be the theatre.</p>
+<p>The tendency of the whole of the preceding considerations is to bring
+the conviction that our globe is a specimen of all the similarly-placed
+bodies of space, as respects its constituent matter and the physical
+and chemical laws governing it, with only this qualification, that there
+are <i>possibly</i> shades of variation with respect to the component
+materials, and <i>undoubtedly</i> with respect to the conditions under
+which the laws operate, and consequently the effects which they produce.&nbsp;
+Thus, there may be substances here which are not in some other bodies,
+and substances here solid may be elsewhere liquid or vaporiform.&nbsp;
+We are the more entitled to draw such conclusions, seeing that there
+is nothing at all singular or special in the astronomical situation
+of the earth.&nbsp; It takes its place third in a series of planets,
+which series is only one of numberless other systems forming one group.&nbsp;
+It is strikingly - if I may use such an expression - a member of a democracy.&nbsp;
+Hence, we cannot suppose that there is any peculiarity about it which
+does not probably attach to multitudes of other bodies - in fact, to
+all that are analogous to it in respect of cosmical arrangements.</p>
+<p>It therefore becomes a point of great interest - what are the materials
+of this specimen?&nbsp; What is the constitutional character of this
+object, which may be said to be a sample, presented to our immediate
+observation, of those crowds of worlds which seem to us as the particles
+of the desert sand-cloud in number, and to whose profusion there are
+no conceivable local limits?</p>
+<p>The solids, liquids, and aeriform fluids of our globe are all, as
+has been stated, reducible into fifty-five substances hitherto called
+elementary.&nbsp; Six are gases; oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen being
+the chief.&nbsp; Forty-two are metals, of which eleven are remarkable
+as composing, in combination with oxygen, certain earths, as magnesia,
+lime, alumin.&nbsp; The remaining six, including carbon, silicon, sulphur,
+have not any general appellation.</p>
+<p>The gas oxygen is considered as by far the most abundant substance
+in our globe.&nbsp; It constitutes a fifth part of our atmosphere, a
+third part of water, and a large proportion of every kind of rock in
+the crust of the earth.&nbsp; Hydrogen, which forms two-thirds of water,
+and enters into some mineral substances, is perhaps next.&nbsp; Nitrogen,
+of which the atmosphere is four-fifths composed, must be considered
+as an abundant substance.&nbsp; The metal silicium, which unites with
+oxygen in nearly equal parts to form silica, the basis of nearly a half
+of the rocks in the earth&rsquo;s crust, is, of course, an important
+ingredient.&nbsp; Aluminium, the metallic basis of alumin, a large material
+in many rocks, is another abundant elementary substance.&nbsp; So, also,
+is carbon a small ingredient in the atmosphere, but the chief constituent
+of animal and vegetable substances, and of all fossils which ever were
+in the latter condition, amongst which coal takes a conspicuous place.&nbsp;
+The familiarly-known metals, as iron, tin, lead, silver, gold, are elements
+of comparatively small magnitude in that exterior part of the earth&rsquo;s
+body which we are able to investigate.</p>
+<p>It is remarkable of the simple substances that they are generally
+in some compound form.&nbsp; Thus, oxygen and nitrogen, though in union
+they form the aerial envelope of the globe, are never found separate
+in nature.&nbsp; Carbon is pure only in the diamond.&nbsp; And the metallic
+bases of the earths, though the chemist can disengage them, may well
+be supposed unlikely to remain long uncombined, seeing that contact
+with moisture makes them burn.&nbsp; Combination and re-combination
+are principles largely pervading nature.&nbsp; There are few rocks,
+for example, that are not composed of at least two varieties of matter,
+each of which is again a compound of elementary substances.&nbsp; What
+is still more wonderful with respect to this principle of combination,
+all the elementary substances observe certain mathematical proportions
+in their unions.&nbsp; One volume of them unites with one, two, three,
+or more volumes of another, any extra quantity being sure to be left
+over, if such there should be.&nbsp; It is hence supposed that matter
+is composed of infinitely minute particles or atoms, each of which belonging
+to any one substance, can only (through the operation of some as yet
+hidden law) associate with a certain number of the atoms of any other.&nbsp;
+There are also strange predilections amongst substances for each other&rsquo;s
+company.&nbsp; One will remain combined in solution with another, till
+a third is added, when it will abandon the former and attach itself
+to the latter.&nbsp; A fourth being added, the third will perhaps leave
+the first, and join the new comer.</p>
+<p>Such is an outline of the information which chemistry gives us regarding
+the constituent materials of our globe.&nbsp; How infinitely is the
+knowledge increased in interest, when we consider the probability of
+such being the materials of the whole of the bodies of space, and the
+laws under which these everywhere combine, subject only to local and
+accidental variations!</p>
+<p>In considering the cosmogenic arrangements of our globe, our attention
+is called in a special degree to the moon.</p>
+<p>In the nebular hypothesis, satellites are considered as masses thrown
+off from their primaries, exactly as the primaries had previously been
+from the sun.&nbsp; The orbit of any satellite is also to be regarded
+as marking the bounds of the mass of the primary at the time when that
+satellite was thrown off; its speed likewise denotes the rapidity of
+the rotatory motion of the primary at that particular juncture.&nbsp;
+For example, the outermost of the four satellites of Jupiter revolves
+round his body at the distance of 1,180,582 miles, shewing that the
+planet was once 3,675,501 miles in circumference, instead of being,
+as now, only 89,170 miles in diameter.&nbsp; This large mass took rather
+more than sixteen days six hours and a half (the present revolutionary
+period of the outermost satellite) to rotate on its axis.&nbsp; The
+innermost satellite must have been formed when the planet was reduced
+to a circumference of 309,075 miles, and rotated in about forty-two
+hours and a half.</p>
+<p>From similar inferences, we find that the mass of the earth, at a
+certain point of time after it was thrown off from the sun, was no less
+than 482,000 miles in diameter, being sixty times what it has since
+shrunk to.&nbsp; At that time, the mass must have taken rather more
+than twenty-nine and a half days to rotate, (being the revolutionary
+period of the moon,) instead of as now, rather less than twenty-four
+hours.</p>
+<p>The time intervening between the formation of the moon and the earth&rsquo;s
+diminution to its present size, was probably one of those vast sums
+in which astronomy deals so largely, but which the mind altogether fails
+to grasp.</p>
+<p>The observations made upon the surface of the moon by telescopes,
+tend strongly to support the hypothesis as to all the bodies of space
+being composed of similar matters, subject to certain variations.&nbsp;
+It does not appear that our satellite is provided with that gaseous
+envelope which, on earth, performs so many important functions.&nbsp;
+Neither is there any appearance of water upon the surface; yet that
+surface is, like that of our globe, marked by inequalities and the appearance
+of volcanic operations.&nbsp; These inequalities and volcanic operations
+are upon a scale far greater than any which now exist upon the earth&rsquo;s
+surface.&nbsp; Although, from the greater force of gravitation upon
+its exterior, the mountains, other circumstances being equal, might
+have been expected to be much smaller than ours, they are, in many instances,
+equal in height to nearly the highest of our Andes.&nbsp; They are generally
+of extreme steepness, and sharp of outline, a peculiarity which might
+be looked for in a planet deficient in water and atmosphere, seeing
+that these are the agents which wear down ruggedness on the surface
+of our earth.&nbsp; The volcanic operations are on a stupendous scale.&nbsp;
+They are the cause of the bright spots of the moon, while the want of
+them is what distinguishes the duller portions, usually but erroneously
+called <i>seas</i>.&nbsp; In some parts, bright volcanic matter, besides
+covering one large patch, radiates out in long streams, which appear
+studded with subordinate <i>foci</i> of the same kind of energy.&nbsp;
+Other objects of a most remarkable character are ring mountains, mounts
+like those of the craters of earthly volcanoes, surrounded immediately
+by vast and profound circular pits, hollowed under the general surface,
+these again being surrounded by a circular wall of mountain, rising
+far above the central one, and in the inside of which are terraces about
+the same height as the inner eminence.&nbsp; The well-known bright spot
+in the south-east quarter, called by astronomers <i>Tycho</i>, and which
+can be readily distinguished by the naked eye, is one of these ring-mountains.&nbsp;
+There is one of 200 miles in diameter, with a pit 22,000 feet deep;
+that is, twice the height of &AElig;tna.&nbsp; It is remarkable, that
+the maps given by Humboldt of a volcanic district in South America,
+and one illustrative of the formerly volcanic district of Auvergne,
+in France, present features strikingly like many parts of the moon&rsquo;s
+surface, as seen through a good glass.</p>
+<p>These characteristics of the moon forbid the idea that it can be
+at present a theatre of life like the earth, and almost seem to declare
+that it never can become so.&nbsp; But we must not rashly draw any such
+conclusions.&nbsp; The moon may be only in an earlier stage of the progress
+through which the earth has already gone.&nbsp; The elements which seem
+wanting may be only in combinations different in those which exist here,
+and may yet be developed as we here find them.&nbsp; Seas may yet fill
+the profound hollows of the surface; an atmosphere may spread over the
+whole.&nbsp; Should these events take place, meteorological phenomena,
+and all the phenomena of organic life, will commence, and the moon,
+like the earth, will become a green and inhabited world.</p>
+<p>It is unavoidably held as a strong proof in favour of any hypothesis,
+when all the relative phenomena are in harmony with it.&nbsp; This is
+eminently the case with the nebulous hypothesis, for here the associated
+facts cannot be explained on any other supposition.&nbsp; We have seen
+reason to conclude that the primary condition of matter was that of
+a diffused mass, in which the component molecules were probably kept
+apart through the efficacy of heat; that portions of this agglomerated
+into suns, which threw off planets; that these planets were at first
+very much diffused, but gradually contracted by cooling to their present
+dimensions.&nbsp; Now, as to our own globe, there is a remarkable proof
+of its having been in a fluid state at the time when it was finally
+solidifying, in the fact of its being bulged at the equator, the very
+form which a soft revolving body takes, and must inevitably take, under
+the influence of centrifugal force.&nbsp; This bulging makes the equatorial
+exceed the polar diameter as 230 to 229, which has been demonstrated
+to be precisely the departure from a correct sphere which might be predicated
+from a knowledge of the amount of the mass and the rate of rotation.&nbsp;
+There is an almost equally distinct memorial of the original high temperature
+of the materials, in the store of heat which still exists in the interior.&nbsp;
+The immediate surface of the earth, be it observed, exhibits only the
+temperature which might be expected to be imparted to such materials,
+by the heat of the sun.&nbsp; There is a point, very short way down,
+but varying in different climes, where all effect from the sun&rsquo;s
+rays ceases.&nbsp; Then, however, commences a temperature from an entirely
+different cause, one which evidently has its source in the interior
+of the earth, and which regularly increases as we descend to greater
+and greater depths, the rate of increment being about one degree Fahrenheit
+for every sixty feet; and of this high temperature there are other evidences,
+in the phenomena of volcanoes and thermal springs, as well as in what
+is ascertained with regard to the density of the entire mass of the
+earth.&nbsp; This, it will be remembered, is four and a half times the
+weight of water; but the actual weight of the principal solid substances
+composing the outer crust is as two and a half times the weight of water;
+and this, we know, if the globe were solid and cold, should increase
+vastly towards the centre, water acquiring the density of quicksilver
+at 362 miles below the surface, and other things in proportion, and
+these densities becoming much greater at greater depths; so that the
+entire mass of a cool globe should be of a gravity infinitely exceeding
+four and a half times the weight of water.&nbsp; The only alternative
+supposition is, that the central materials are greatly expanded or diffused
+by some means; and by what means could they be so expanded but by heat?&nbsp;
+Indeed, the existence of this central heat, a residuum of that which
+kept all matter in a vaporiform chaos at first, is amongst the most
+solid discoveries of modern science, <a name="citation42"></a><a href="#footnote42">{42}</a>
+and the support which it gives to Herschel&rsquo;s explanation of the
+formation of worlds is most important.&nbsp; We shall hereafter see
+what appear to be traces of an operation of this heat upon the surface
+of the earth in very remote times; an effect, however, which has long
+passed entirely away.&nbsp; The central heat has, for ages, reached
+a fixed point, at which it will probably remain for ever, as the non-conducting
+quality of the cool crust absolutely prevents it from suffering any
+diminution.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>THE EARTH FORMED - ERA OF THE PRIMARY ROCKS.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>Although the earth has not been actually penetrated to a greater
+depth than three thousand feet, the nature of its substance can, in
+many instances, be inferred for the depth of many miles by other means
+of observation.&nbsp; We see a mountain composed of a particular substance,
+with strata, or beds of other rock, lying against its sloped sides;
+we, of course, infer that the substance of the mountain dips away under
+the strata which we see lying against it.&nbsp; Suppose that we walk
+away from the mountain across the turned up edges of the stratified
+rocks, and that for many miles we continue to pass over other stratified
+rocks, all disposed in the same way, till by and bye we come to a place
+where we begin to cross the opposite edges of the same beds; after which
+we pass over these rocks all in reverse order till we come to another
+extensive mountain composed of similar material to the first, and shelving
+away under the strata in the same way.&nbsp; We should then infer that
+the stratified rocks occupied a basin formed by the rock of these two
+mountains, and by calculating the thickness right through these strata,
+could be able to say to what depth the rock of the mountain extended
+below.&nbsp; By such means, the kind of rock existing many miles below
+the surface can often be inferred with considerable confidence.</p>
+<p>The interior of the globe has now been inspected in this way in many
+places, and a tolerably distinct notion of its general arrangements
+has consequently been arrived at.&nbsp; It appears that the basis rock
+of the earth, as it may be called, is of hard texture, and crystalline
+in its constitution.&nbsp; Of this rock, granite may be said to be the
+type, though it runs into many varieties.&nbsp; Over this, except in
+the comparatively few places where it projects above the general level
+in mountains, other rocks are disposed in sheets or strata, with the
+appearance of having been deposited originally from water; but these
+last rocks have nowhere been allowed to rest in their original arrangement.&nbsp;
+Uneasy movements from below have broken them up in great inclined masses,
+while in many cases there has been projected through the rents rocky
+matter more or less resembling the great inferior crystalline mass.&nbsp;
+This rocky matter must have been in a state of fusion from heat at the
+time of its projection, for it is often found to have run into and filled
+up lateral chinks in these rents.&nbsp; There are even instances where
+it has been rent again, and a newer melted matter of the same character
+sent through the opening.&nbsp; Finally, in the crust as thus arranged
+there are, in many places, chinks containing veins of metal.&nbsp; Thus,
+there is first a great inferior mass, composed of crystalline rock,
+and probably resting immediately on the fused and expanded matter of
+the interior: next, layers or strata of aqueous origin; next, irregular
+masses of melted inferior rock that have been sent up volcanically and
+confusedly at various times amongst the aqueous rocks, breaking up these
+into masses, and tossing them out of their original levels.&nbsp; This
+is an outline of the arrangements of the crust of the earth, as far
+as we can observe it.&nbsp; It is, at first sight, a most confused scene;
+but after some careful observation, we readily detect in it a regularity
+and order from which much instruction in the history of our globe is
+to be derived.</p>
+<p>The deposition of the aqueous rocks, and the projection of the volcanic,
+have unquestionably taken place since the settlement of the earth in
+its present form.&nbsp; They are indeed of an order of events which
+we see going on, under the agency of more or less intelligible causes,
+even down to the present day.&nbsp; We may therefore consider them generally
+as comparatively recent transactions.&nbsp; Abstracting them from the
+investigations before us, we arrive at the idea of the earth in its
+first condition as a globe of its present size - namely, as a mass,
+externally at least, consisting of the crystalline kind of rock, with
+the waters of the present seas and the present atmosphere around it,
+though these were probably in considerably different conditions, both
+as to temperature and their constituent materials, from what they now
+are.&nbsp; We are thus to presume that that crystalline texture of rock
+which we see exemplified in granite is the condition into which the
+great bulk of the solids of our earth were agglomerated directly from
+the nebulous or vaporiform state.&nbsp; It is a condition eminently
+of combination, for such rock is invariably composed of two or more
+of four substances - silica, mica, quartz, and hornblende - which associate
+in it in the form of grains or crystals, and which are themselves each
+composed of a group of the simple or elementary substances.</p>
+<p>Judging from the results and from still remaining conditions, we
+must suppose that the heat retained in the interior of the globe was
+more intense, or had greater freedom to act, in some places than in
+others.&nbsp; These became the scenes of volcanic operations, and in
+time marked their situations by the extrusion of traps and basalts from
+below - namely, rocks composed of the crystalline matter fused by intense
+heat, and developed on the surface in various conditions, according
+to the particular circumstances under which it was sent up; some, for
+example, being thrown up under water, and some in the open air, which
+conditions are found to have made considerable difference in its texture
+and appearance.&nbsp; The great stores of subterranean heat also served
+an important purpose in the formation of the aqueous rocks.&nbsp; These
+rocks might, according to Sir John Herschel, become subject to heat
+in the following manner:- While the surface of a particular mass of
+rock forms the bed of the sea, the heat is kept at a certain distance
+from that surface by the contact of the water; philosophically speaking,
+it radiates away the heat into the sea, and (to resort to common language)
+is cooled a good way down.&nbsp; But when new sediment settles at the
+bottom of that sea, the heat rises up to what was formerly the surface;
+and when a second quantity of sediment is laid down, it continues to
+rise through the first of the deposits, which then becomes subjected
+to those changes which heat is calculated to produce.&nbsp; This process
+is precisely the same as that of putting additional coats upon our own
+bodies; when, of course, the internal heat rises through each coat in
+succession, and the third (supposing there is a fourth above it) becomes
+as warm as perhaps the first originally was.</p>
+<p>In speaking of sedimentary rocks, we may be said to be anticipating.&nbsp;
+It is necessary, first, to shew how such rocks were formed, or how stratification
+commenced.</p>
+<p>Geology tells us as plainly as possible, that the original crystalline
+mass was not a perfectly smooth ball, with air and water playing round
+it.&nbsp; There were vast irregularities in the surface, - irregularities
+trifling, perhaps, compared with the whole bulk of the globe, but assuredly
+vast in comparison with any which now exist upon it.&nbsp; These irregularities
+might be occasioned by inequalities in the cooling of the substance,
+or by accidental and local sluggishness of the materials, or by local
+effects of the concentrated internal heat.&nbsp; From whatever cause
+they arose, there they were - enormous granitic mountains, interspersed
+with seas which sunk to a depth equally profound, and by which, perhaps,
+the mountains were wholly or partially covered.&nbsp; Now, it is a fact
+of which the very first principles of geology assure us, that the solids
+of the globe cannot for a moment be exposed to water, or to the atmosphere,
+without becoming liable to change.&nbsp; They instantly begin to wear
+down.&nbsp; This operation, we may be assured, proceeded with as much
+certainty in the earliest ages of our earth&rsquo;s history, as it does
+now, but upon a much more magnificent scale.&nbsp; There is the clearest
+evidence that the seas of those days were not in some instances less
+than a hundred miles in depth, however much more.&nbsp; The sub-aqueous
+mountains must necessarily have been of at least equal magnitude.&nbsp;
+The system of disintegration consequent upon such conditions would be
+enormous.&nbsp; The matters worn off, being carried into the neighbouring
+depths, and there deposited, became the components of the earliest stratified
+rocks, the first series of which is the <i>Gneiss and Mica Slate System</i>,
+or series, examples of which are exposed to view in the Highlands of
+Scotland and in the West of England.&nbsp; The vast thickness of these
+beds, in some instances, is what attests the profoundness of the primeval
+oceans in which they were formed; the Pensylvanian grawacke, a member
+of the next highest series, is not less than a hundred miles in direct
+thickness.&nbsp; We have also evidence that the earliest strata were
+formed in the presence of a stronger degree of heat than what operated
+in subsequent stages of the world, for the lamin&aelig; of the gneiss
+and of the mica and chlorite schists are contorted in a way which could
+only be the result of a very high temperature.&nbsp; It appears as if
+the seas in which these deposits were formed, had been in the troubled
+state of a caldron of water nearly at boiling heat.&nbsp; Such a condition
+would probably add not a little to the disintegrating power of the ocean.</p>
+<p>The earliest stratified rocks contain no matters which are not to
+be found in the primitive granite.&nbsp; They are the same in material,
+but only changed into new forms and combinations; hence they have been
+called by Mr. Lyell, metamorphic rocks.&nbsp; But how comes it that
+some of them are composed almost exclusively of one of the materials
+of granite; the mica schists, for example, of mica - the quartz rocks,
+of quartz, &amp;c.?&nbsp; For this there are both chemical and mechanical
+causes.&nbsp; Suppose that a river has a certain quantity of material
+to carry down, it is evident that it will soonest drop the larger particles,
+and carry the lightest farthest on.&nbsp; To such a cause is it owing
+that some of the materials of the worn-down granite have settled in
+one place and some in another. <a name="citation52"></a><a href="#footnote52">{52}</a>&nbsp;
+Again, some of these materials must be presumed to have been in a state
+of chemical solution in the primeval seas.&nbsp; It would be, of course,
+in conformity with chemical laws, that certain of these materials would
+be precipitated singly, or in modified combinations, to the bottom,
+so as to form rocks by themselves.</p>
+<p>The rocks hitherto spoken of contain none of those petrified remains
+of vegetables and animals which abound so much in subsequently formed
+rocks, and tell so wondrous a tale of the past history of our globe.&nbsp;
+They simply contain, as has been said, mineral materials derived from
+the primitive mass, and which appear to have been formed into strata
+in seas of vast depth.&nbsp; The absence from these rocks of all traces
+of vegetable and animal life, joined to a consideration of the excessive
+temperature which seems to have prevailed in their epoch, has led to
+the inference that no plants or animals of any kind then existed.&nbsp;
+A few geologists have indeed endeavoured to shew that the absence of
+organic remains is no proof of the globe having been then unfruitful
+or uninhabited, as the heat to which these rocks have been subjected
+at the time of their solidification, might have obliterated any remains
+of either plants or animals which were included in them.&nbsp; But this
+is only an hypothesis of negation; and it certainly seems very unlikely
+that a degree of heat sufficient to obliterate the remains of plants
+or animals when dead, would ever allow of their coming into or continuing
+in existence.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>COMMENCEMENT OF ORGANIC LIFE - SEA PLANTS, CORALS, ETC.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>We can scarcely be said to have passed out of these rocks, when we
+begin to find new conditions in the earth.&nbsp; It is here to be observed
+that the subsequent rocks are formed, in a great measure, of matters
+derived from the substance of those which went before, but contain also
+beds of limestone, which is to no small extent composed of an ingredient
+which has not hitherto appeared.&nbsp; Limestone is a carbonate of lime,
+a secondary compound, of which one of the ingredients, carbonic acid
+gas, presents the element <i>carbon</i>, a perfect novelty in our progress.&nbsp;
+Whence this substance?&nbsp; The question is the more interesting, from
+our knowing that carbon is the main ingredient in organic things.&nbsp;
+There is reason to believe that its primeval condition was that of a
+gas, confined in the interior of the earth, and diffused in the atmosphere.&nbsp;
+The atmosphere still contains about a two-thousandth part of carbonic
+acid gas, forming the grand store from which the substance of each year&rsquo;s
+crop of herbage and grain is derived, passing from herbage and grain
+into animal substance, and from animals again rendered back to the atmosphere
+in their expired breath, so that its amount is never impaired.&nbsp;
+Knowing this, when we hear of carbon beginning to appear in the ascending
+series of rocks, we are unavoidably led to consider it as marking a
+time of some importance in the earth&rsquo;s history, a new era of natural
+conditions, one in which organic life has probably played a part.</p>
+<p>It is not easy to suppose that, at this period, carbon was adopted
+directly in its gaseous form into rocks; for, if so, why should it not
+have been taken into earlier ones also?&nbsp; But we know that plants
+take it in, and transform it into substance; and we also know that there
+are classes of animals (marine polypes) which are capable of appropriating
+it, in connexion with lime, (carbonate of lime,) from the waters of
+the ocean, provided it be there in solution; and this substance do these
+animals deposit in masses (coral reefs) equal in extent to many strata.&nbsp;
+It has even been suggested, on strong grounds of probability, that a
+class of limestone beds are simply these reefs subjected to subsequent
+heat and pressure.</p>
+<p>The appearance, then, of limestone beds in the early part of the
+stratified series, may be presumed to be connected with the fact of
+the commencement of organic life upon our planet, and, indeed, a consequent
+and a symptom of it.</p>
+<p>It may not be out of place here to remark, that carbon is presumed
+to exist largely in the interior of the earth, from the fact of such
+considerable quantities of it issuing at this day, in the form of carbonic
+acid gas, from fissures and springs.&nbsp; The primeval and subsequent
+history of this element is worthy of much attention, and we shall have
+to revert to it as a matter greatly concerning our subject.&nbsp; Delabeche
+estimates the quantity of carbonic acid gas locked up in every cubic
+yard of limestone, at 16,000 cubic feet.&nbsp; The quantity locked up
+in coal, in which it forms from 64 to 75 per cent., must also be enormous.&nbsp;
+If all this were disengaged in a gaseous form, the constitution of the
+atmosphere would undergo a change, of which the first effect would be
+the extinction of life in all land animals.&nbsp; But a large proportion
+of it must have at one time been in the atmosphere.&nbsp; The atmosphere
+would then, of course, be incapable of supporting life in land animals.&nbsp;
+It is important, however, to observe that such an atmosphere would not
+be inconsistent with a luxuriant land vegetation; for experiment has
+proved that plants will flourish in air containing <i>one-twelfth</i>
+of this gas, or 166 times more than the present charge of our atmosphere.&nbsp;
+The results which we observe are perfectly consistent with, and may
+be said to presuppose an atmosphere highly charged with this gas, from
+about the close of the primary non-fossiliferous rocks to the termination
+of the carboniferous series, for there we see vast deposits (coal) containing
+carbon as a large ingredient, while at the same time the leaves of the
+<i>Stone Book</i> present no record of the contemporaneous existence
+of land animals.</p>
+<p>The hypothesis of the connexion of the first limestone beds with
+the commencement of organic life upon our planet is supported by the
+fact, that in these beds we find the first remains of the bodies of
+animated creatures.&nbsp; My hypothesis may indeed be unsound; but,
+whether or not, it is clear, taking organic remains as upon the whole
+a faithful chronicle, that the deposition of these limestone beds was
+coeval with the existence of the earliest, or all but the earliest,
+living creatures upon earth.</p>
+<p>And what were those creatures?&nbsp; It might well be with a kind
+of awe that the uninstructed inquirer would wait for an answer to this
+question.&nbsp; But nature is simpler than man&rsquo;s wit would make
+her, and behold, the interrogation only brings before us the unpretending
+forms of various zoophytes and polypes, together with a few single and
+double-valved shell-fish (mollusks), all of them creatures of the sea.&nbsp;
+It is rather surprising to find these before any vegetable forms, considering
+that vegetables appear to us as forming the necessary first link in
+the chain of nutrition; but it is probable that there were sea plants,
+and also some simpler forms of animal life, before this period, although
+of too slight a substance to leave any fossil trace of their existence.</p>
+<p>The exact point in the ascending stratified series at which the first
+traces of organic life are to be found is not clearly determined.&nbsp;
+Dr. M&rsquo;Culloch states that he found fossil orthocerata (a kind
+of shell-fish) so early as the gneiss tract of Loch Eribol, in Sutherland;
+but Messrs. Sedgwick and Murchison, on a subsequent search, could not
+verify the discovery.&nbsp; It has also been stated, that the gneiss
+and mica tract of Bohemia contains some seams of grawacke, in which
+are organic remains; but British geologists have not as yet attached
+much importance to this statement.&nbsp; We have to look a little higher
+in the series for indubitable traces of organic life.</p>
+<p>Above the gneiss and mica slate system, or group of strata, is the
+<i>Clay Slate and Grawacke Slate System</i>; that is to say, it is higher
+in the <i>order of supraposition</i>, though very often it rests immediately
+on the primitive granite.&nbsp; The sub-groups of this system are in
+the following succession upwards:- 1, hornblende slate; 2, chiastolite
+slate; 3, clay slate; 4, Snowdon rocks, (grawacke and conglomerates;)
+5, Bala limestone; 6, Plynlymmon rocks, (grawacke and grawacke slates,
+with beds of conglomerates.)&nbsp; This system is largely developed
+in the west and north of England, and it has been well examined, partly
+because some of the slate beds are extensively quarried for domestic
+purposes.&nbsp; If we overlook the dubious statements respecting Sutherland
+and Bohemia, we have in this &ldquo;system&rdquo; the first appearances
+of life upon our planet.&nbsp; The animal remains are chiefly confined
+to the slate beds, those named from Bala, in Wales, being the most prolific.&nbsp;
+<i>Zoophyta</i>, <i>polyparia</i>, <i>crinoidea</i>, <i>conchifera</i>,
+and <i>crustacea</i>, <a name="citation60"></a><a href="#footnote60">{60}</a>
+are the orders of the animal kingdom thus found in the earliest of earth&rsquo;s
+sepulchres.&nbsp; The <i>orders</i> are distinguished without difficulty,
+from the general characters of the creatures whose remains are found;
+but it is only in this general character that they bear a general resemblance
+to any creatures now existing.&nbsp; When we come to consider specific
+characters, we see that a difference exists - that, in short, the species
+and even genera are no longer represented upon earth.&nbsp; More than
+this, it will be found that the earliest species comparatively soon
+gave place to others, and that they are not represented even in the
+next higher group of rocks.&nbsp; One important remark has been made,
+that a comparatively small variety of species is found in the older
+rocks, although of some particular ones the remains are very abundant;
+as, for instance, of a species of asaphus, which is found between the
+lamin&aelig; of some of the slate rocks of Wales, and the corresponding
+rocks of Normandy and Germany in enormous quantities.</p>
+<p>Ascending to the next group of rocks, we find the traces of life
+become more abundant, the number of species extended, and important
+additions made in certain vestiges of fuci, or sea-plants, and of fishes.&nbsp;
+This group of rocks has been called by English geologists, the <i>Silurian
+System</i>, because largely developed at the surface of a district of
+western England, formerly occupied by a people whom the Roman historians
+call Silures.&nbsp; It is a series of sandstones, limestones, and beds
+of shale (hardened mud), which are classed in the following sub-groups,
+beginning with the undermost: - 1, Llandillo rocks, (darkish calcareous
+flagstones;) 2 and 3, two groups called Caradoc rocks; 4, Wenlock shale;
+5, Wenlock limestone; 6, Lower Ludlow rocks, (shales and limestones;)
+7, Aymestry limestone; 8, Upper Ludlow rocks, (shales and limestone,
+chiefly micaceous.)&nbsp; From the lowest beds upwards, there are polypiaria,
+though most prevalent in the Wenlock limestone; conchifera, a vast number
+of genera, but all of the order brachiopoda, (including terebratula,
+pentamerus, spirifer, orthis, lept&aelig;na;) mollusca, of several orders
+and many genera, (including turritella, orthoceras, nautilus, bellerophon;)
+crustacea, all of them trilobites, (including trinucleus, asaphus, calamene.)&nbsp;
+A little above the Llandillo rocks, there have been discovered certain
+convoluted forms, which are now established as annelids, or sea-worms,
+a tribe of creatures still existing, (nereidina and serpulina,) and
+which may often be found beneath stones on a sea-beach.&nbsp; One of
+these, figured by Mr. Murchison, is furnished with feet in vast numbers
+all along its body, like a centipede.&nbsp; The occurrence of annelids
+is important, on account of their character and status in the animal
+kingdom.&nbsp; They are red-blooded and hermaphrodite, and form a link
+of connexion between the annulosa (white-blooded worms) and a humble
+class of the vertebrata. <a name="citation62"></a><a href="#footnote62">{62}</a>&nbsp;
+The Wenlock limestone is most remarkable amongst all the rocks of the
+Silurian system, for organic remains.&nbsp; Many slabs of it are wholly
+composed of corals, shells, and trilobites, held together by shale.&nbsp;
+It contains many genera of crinoidea and polypiaria, and it is thought
+that some beds of it are wholly the production of the latter creatures,
+or are, in other words, coral reefs transformed by heat and pressure
+into rocks.&nbsp; Remains of fishes, of a very minute size, have been
+detected by Mr. Philips in the Aymestry limestone, being apparently
+the first examples of vertebrated animals which breathed upon our planet.&nbsp;
+In the upper Ludlow rocks, remains of six genera of fish have been for
+a longer period known; they belong to the order of cartilaginous fishes,
+an order of mean organization and ferocious habits, of which the shark
+and sturgeon are living specimens.&nbsp; &ldquo;Some were furnished
+with long palates, and squat, firmly-based teeth, well adapted for crushing
+the strong-cased zoophytes and shells of the period, fragments of which
+occur in the f&oelig;cal remains; some with teeth that, like the fossil
+sharks of the later formations, resemble lines of miniature pyramids,
+larger and smaller alternating; some with teeth sharp, thin, and so
+deeply serrated, that every individual tooth resembles a row of poniards
+set up against the walls of an armory; and these last, says Agassiz,
+furnished with weapons so murderous, must have been the pirates of the
+period.&nbsp; Some had their fins guarded with long spines, hooked like
+the beak of an eagle; some with spines of straighter and more slender
+form, and ribbed and furrowed longitudinally like columns; some were
+shielded by an armour of bony points, and some thickly covered with
+glistening scales.&rdquo; <a name="citation64"></a><a href="#footnote64">{64}</a></p>
+<p>The traces of fuci in this system are all but sufficient to allow
+of a distinction of genera.&nbsp; In some parts of North America, extensive
+though thin beds of them have been found.&nbsp; A distinguished French
+geologist, M. Brogniart, has shewn that all existing marine plants are
+classifiable with regard to the zones of climate; some being fitted
+for the torrid zone, some for the temperate, some for the frigid.&nbsp;
+And he establishes that the fuci of these early rocks speak of a torrid
+climate, although they may be found in what are now temperate regions;
+he also states that those of the higher rocks betoken, as we ascend,
+a gradually diminishing temperature.</p>
+<p>We thus early begin to find proofs of the general uniformity of organic
+life over the surface of the earth, at the time when each particular
+system of rocks was formed.&nbsp; Species identical with the remains
+in the Wenlock limestone occur in the corresponding class of rocks in
+the Eifel, and partially in the Harz, Norway, Russia, and Brittany.&nbsp;
+The situations of the remains in Russia are fifteen hundred miles from
+the Wenlock beds; but at the distance of between six and seven thousand
+from those, - namely, in the vale of Mississippi, the same species are
+discovered.&nbsp; Uniformity in animal life over large geographical
+areas argues uniformity in the conditions of animal life; and hence
+arise some curious inferences.&nbsp; Species, in the same low class
+of animals, are now much more limited; for instance, the Red Sea gives
+different polypiaria, zoophytes, and shell-fish, from the Mediterranean.&nbsp;
+It is the opinion of M. Brogniart, that the uniformity which existed
+in the primeval times can only be attributed to the temperature arising
+from the internal heat, which had yet, as he supposes, been sufficiently
+great to overpower the ordinary meteorological influences, and spread
+a tropical clime all over the globe.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>ERA OF THE OLD RED SANDSTONE - FISHES ABUNDANT.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>We advance to a new chapter in this marvellous history - the era
+of the <i>Old Red Sandstone System</i>.&nbsp; This term has been recently
+applied to a series of strata, of enormous thickness in the whole mass,
+largely developed in Herefordshire, Shropshire, Worcestershire, and
+South Wales; also in the counties of Fife, Forfar, Moray, Cromarty,
+and Caithness; and in Russia and North America, if not in many other
+parts of the world.&nbsp; The particular strata forming the system are
+somewhat different in different countries; but there is a general character
+to the extent of these being a mixture of flagstones, marly rocks, and
+sandstones, usually of a laminous structure, with conglomerates.&nbsp;
+There is also a schist shewing the presence of bitumen; a remarkable
+new ingredient, since it is a vegetable production.&nbsp; In the conglomerates,
+of great extent and thickness, which form, in at least one district,
+the basis or leading feature of the system, inclosing water-worn fragments
+of quartz and other rocks, we have evidence of the seas of that period
+having been subjected to a violent and long-continued agitation, probably
+from volcanic causes.&nbsp; The upper members of the series bear the
+appearance of having been deposited in comparatively tranquil seas.&nbsp;
+The English specimens of this system shew a remarkable freedom from
+those disturbances which result in the interjection of trap; and they
+are thus defective in mineral ores.&nbsp; In some parts of England the
+old red sandstone system has been stated as 10,000 feet in thickness.</p>
+<p>In this era, the forms of life which existed in the Silurian are
+continued: we have the same orders of marine creatures, zoophyta, polypiaria,
+conchifera, crustacea; but to these are added numerous fishes, some
+of which are of most extraordinary and surprising forms.&nbsp; Several
+of the strata are crowded with remains of fish, shewing that the seas
+in which those beds were deposited had swarmed with that class of inhabitants.&nbsp;
+The investigation of this system is recent; but already <a name="citation68"></a><a href="#footnote68">{68}</a>
+M. Agassiz has ascertained about twenty genera, and thrice the number
+of species.&nbsp; And it is remarkable that the Silurian fishes are
+here only represented in genera; the whole of the <i>species</i> of
+that era had already passed away.&nbsp; Even throughout the sub-groups
+of the system itself, the species are changed; and these are phenomena
+observed throughout all the subsequent systems or geological eras; apparently
+arguing that, during the deposition of all the rocks, a gradual change
+of physical conditions was constantly going on.&nbsp; A varying temperature,
+or even a varying depth of sea, would at present be attended with similar
+changes in marine life; and by analogy we are entitled to assume that
+such variations in the ancient seas might be amongst the causes of that
+constant change of genera and species in the inhabitants of those seas
+to which the organic contents of the rocks bear witness.</p>
+<p>Some of the fossils of this system, - the cephalaspis, coccosteus,
+pterichthys, holoptychius - are, in form and structure, entirely different
+from any fishes now existing, only the sturgeon family having any trace
+of affinity to them in any respect.&nbsp; They seem to form a sort of
+connecting link between the crustacea and true fishes.</p>
+<p>The <i>cephalaspis</i> may be considered as making the smallest advance
+from the crustacean character; it very much resembles in form the asaphus
+of lower formations, having a longish tail-like body inserted within
+the cusp of a large crescent-shaped head, somewhat like a saddler&rsquo;s
+cutting-knife.&nbsp; The body is covered with strong plates of bone,
+enamelled, and the head was protected on the upper side with one large
+plate, as with a buckler - hence the name, implying <i>buckler-head</i>.&nbsp;
+A range of small fins conveys the idea of its having been as weak in
+motion as it is strong in structure.&nbsp; The <i>coccosteus</i> may
+be said to mark the next advance to fish creation.&nbsp; The outline
+of its body is of the form of a short thick coffin, rounded, covered
+with strong bony plates, and terminating in a long tail, which seems
+to have been the sole organ of motion.&nbsp; It is very remarkable,
+that, while the tail establishes this creature among the vertebrata
+and the fishes, its mouth has been opened vertically, like those of
+the crustaceans, but which is contrary to the mode of vertebrata generally.&nbsp;
+This seems a pretty strong mark of the link character of the coccosteus
+between these two great departments of the animal kingdom.&nbsp; The
+<i>pterichthys</i> has also strong bony plates over its body, arranged
+much like those of a tortoise, and has a long tail; but its most remarkable
+feature, and that which has suggested its name, is a pair of long and
+narrow wing-like appendages attached to the shoulders, which the creature
+is supposed to have erected for its defence when attacked by an enemy.</p>
+<p>The <i>holoptychius</i> is of a flat oval form, furnished with fins,
+and ending in a long tail; the whole body covered with strong plates
+which overlap each other, and the head forming only a slight rounded
+projection from the general figure.&nbsp; The specimens in the lower
+beds are not above the size of a flounder; but in the higher strata,
+to judge by the size of the scales or plates which have been found,
+the creature attained a comparatively monstrous size.</p>
+<p>The other fishes of the system, - the osteolepis, glyptolepis, dipterus,
+&amp;c., are, in general outline, much like fishes still existing, but
+their organization has, nevertheless, some striking peculiarities.&nbsp;
+They have been entirely covered with bony scales or plates, enamelled
+externally; their spines are tipped with bone, and, as one striking
+and unvarying feature, the tail is only finned on the lower side.&nbsp;
+The internal skeleton, of which no traces have been preserved, is presumed
+to have been cartilaginous.&nbsp; They therefore unite the character
+of cartilaginous fishes with a character peculiar to themselves, and
+in which we see pretty clear vestiges of the pre-existent crustaceous
+form.</p>
+<p>With regard to the link character of these animals, some curious
+facts are mentioned.&nbsp; It appears that in the imperfect condition
+of the vertebral column, and the inferior situation of the mouth in
+the pterichthys, coccosteus, &amp;c., there is an analogy to the form
+of the dorsal cord and position of the mouth in the embryo of perfect
+fishes.&nbsp; The one-sided form of the tail in the osteolepis &amp;c.
+finds a similar analogy in the form of the tail in the embryo of the
+salmon.&nbsp; It is not premature to remark how broadly these facts
+seem to hint at a parity of law affecting the progress of general creation,
+and the progress of an individual f&oelig;tus of one of the more perfect
+animals.</p>
+<p>It is equally ascertained of the types of being prevalent in the
+old red, as of those of the preceding system, that they are uniform
+in the corresponding strata of distant parts of the earth; for instance,
+Russia and North America.</p>
+<p>In the old red sandstone, the marine plants, of which faint traces
+are observable in the Silurians, continue to appear.&nbsp; It would
+seem as if less change took place in the vegetation than in the animals
+of those early seas; and for this, as Mr. Miller has remarked, it is
+easy to imagine reasons.&nbsp; For example, an infusion of lime into
+the sea would destroy animal life, but be favourable to vegetation.</p>
+<p>As yet there were no land animals or plants, and for this the presumable
+reason is, that no dry land as yet existed.&nbsp; We are not left to
+make this inference solely from the absence of land animals and plants;
+in the arrangement of the primary (stratified) rocks, we have further
+evidence of it.&nbsp; That these rocks were formed in a generally horizontal
+position, we are as well assured as that they were formed at the bottom
+of seas.&nbsp; But they are always found greatly inclined in position,
+tilted up against the slopes of the granitic masses which are beneath
+them in geological order, though often shooting up to a higher point
+in the atmosphere.&nbsp; No doubt can be entertained that these granitic
+masses, forming our principal mountain ranges, have been protruded from
+below, or, at least, thrust much further up, <i>since</i> the deposition
+of the primary rocks.&nbsp; The protrusion was what tilted up the primary
+rocks; and the inference is, of course, unavoidable, that these mountains
+have risen chiefly, at least, since the primary rocks were laid down.&nbsp;
+It is remarkable that, while the primary rocks thus incline towards
+granitic nuclei or axes, the strata higher in the series rest against
+these again, generally at a less inclination, or none at all, shewing
+that these strata were laid down after the swelling mountain eminences
+had, by their protrusion, tilted up the primary strata.&nbsp; And thus
+it may be said an era of local upthrowing of the primitive and (perhaps)
+central matter of our planet, is established as happening about the
+close of the primary strata, and beginning of the next ensuing system.&nbsp;
+It may be called the <i>Era of the Oldest Mountains</i>, or, more boldly,
+of the formation of the detached portions of dry land over the hitherto
+watery surface of the globe - an important part of the designs of Providence,
+for which the time was now apparently come.&nbsp; It may be remarked,
+that volcanic disturbances and protrusions of trap took place throughout
+the whole period of the deposition of the primary rocks; but they were
+upon a comparatively limited scale, and probably all took place under
+water.&nbsp; It was only now that the central granitic masses of the
+great mountain ranges were thrown up, carrying up with them broken edges
+of the primary strata; a process which seems to have had this difference
+from the other, that it was the effect of a more tremendous force exerted
+at a lower depth in the earth, and generally acting in lines pervading
+a considerable portion of the earth&rsquo;s surface.&nbsp; We shall
+by-and-by see that the protrusion of some of the mountain ranges was
+not completed, or did not stop, at that period.&nbsp; There is no part
+of geological science more clear than that which refers to the ages
+of mountains.&nbsp; It is as certain that the Grampian mountains of
+Scotland are older than the Alps and Apennines, as it is that civilization
+had visited Italy, and had enabled her to subdue the world, while Scotland
+was the residence of &ldquo;roving barbarians.&rdquo;&nbsp; The Pyrenees,
+Carpathians, and other ranges of continental Europe, are all younger
+than the Grampians, or even the insignificant Mendip Hills of southern
+England.&nbsp; Stratification tells this tale as plainly as Livy tells
+the history of the Roman republic.&nbsp; It tells us - to use the words
+of Professor Philips - that at the time when the Grampians sent streams
+and detritus to straits where now the valleys of the Forth and Clyde
+meet, the greater part of Europe was a wide ocean.</p>
+<p>The last three systems - called, in England, the Cumbrian, Silurian,
+and Devonian, and collectively the pal&aelig;ozoic rocks, from their
+containing the remains of the earliest inhabitants of the globe - are
+of vast thickness; in England, not much less than 30,000 feet, or nearly
+six miles.&nbsp; In other parts of the world, as we have seen, the earliest
+of these systems alone is of much greater depth - arguing an enormous
+profundity in the ocean in which they were formed.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>SECONDARY ROCKS.&nbsp; ERA OF THE CARBONIFEROUS FORMATION.&nbsp;
+LAND FORMED.&nbsp; COMMENCEMENT OF LAND PLANTS.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>We now enter upon a new great epoch in the history of our globe.&nbsp;
+There was now dry land.&nbsp; As a consequence of this fact, there was
+fresh water, for rain, instead of immediately returning to the sea,
+as formerly, was now gathered in channels of the earth, and became springs,
+rivers, and lakes.&nbsp; There was now a theatre for the existence of
+land plants and animals, and it remains to be inquired if these accordingly
+were produced.</p>
+<p>The Secondary Rocks, in which our further researches are to be prosecuted,
+consist of a great and varied series, resting, generally unconformably,
+against flanks of the upturned primary rocks, sometimes themselves considerably
+inclined, at others, forming extensive basin-like beds, nearly horizontal;
+in many places, much broken up and shifted by disturbances from below.&nbsp;
+They have all been formed out of the materials of the older rocks, by
+virtue of the wearing power of air and water, which is still every day
+carrying down vast quantities of the elevated matter of the globe into
+the sea.&nbsp; But the separate strata are each much more distinct in
+the matter of its composition than might be expected.&nbsp; Some are
+siliceous or arenaceous (sandstones), composed mainly of fine grains
+from the quartz rocks - the most abundant of the primary strata.&nbsp;
+Others are argillaceous - clays, shales, &amp;c., chiefly derived, probably,
+from the slate beds of the primary series.&nbsp; Others are calcareous,
+derived from the early limestone.&nbsp; As a general feature, they are
+softer and less crystalline than the primary rocks, as if they had endured
+less of both heat and pressure than the senior formation.&nbsp; There
+are beds (<i>coal</i>) formed solely of vegetable matter, and some others
+in which the main ingredient is particles of iron, (<i>the iron black
+band</i>.)&nbsp; The secondary rocks are quite as communicative with
+regard to their portion of the earth&rsquo;s history as the primitive
+were.</p>
+<p>The first, or lowest, group of the secondary rocks is called the
+<i>Carboniferous Formation</i>, from the remarkable feature of its numerous
+interspersed beds of coal.&nbsp; It commences with the beds of the <i>mountain
+limestone</i>, which, in some situations, as in Derbyshire and Ireland,
+are of great thickness, being alternated with chert (a siliceous sandstone),
+sandstones, shales, and beds of coal, generally of the harder and less
+bituminous kind (<i>anthracite</i>), the whole being covered in some
+places by the millstone grit, a siliceous conglomerate composed of the
+detritus of the primary rocks.&nbsp; The mountain limestone, attaining
+in England to a depth of eight hundred yards, greatly exceeds in volume
+any of the primary limestone beds, and shews an enormous addition of
+power to the causes formerly suggested as having produced this substance.&nbsp;
+In fact, remains of corals, crinoidea, and shells, are so abundant in
+it, as to compose three-fourths of the mass in some parts.&nbsp; Above
+the mountain limestone commence the more conspicuous <i>coal beds</i>,
+alternating with sandstones, shales, beds of limestone, and ironstone.&nbsp;
+Coal is altogether composed of the matter of a terrestrial vegetation,
+transmuted by pressure.&nbsp; Some fresh-water shells have been found
+in it, but few of marine origin, and no remains of those zoophytes and
+crinoidea so abundant in the mountain limestone and other rocks.&nbsp;
+Coal beds exist in Europe, Asia, and America, and have hitherto been
+esteemed as the most valuable of mineral productions, from the important
+services which the substance renders in manufactures and in domestic
+economy.&nbsp; It is to be remarked, that there are some local variations
+in the arrangement of coal beds.&nbsp; In France, they rest immediately
+on the granite and other primary rocks, the intermediate strata not
+having been found at those places.&nbsp; In America, the kind called
+anthracite occurs among the slate beds, and this species also abounds
+more in the mountain limestone than with us.&nbsp; These last circumstances
+only shew that different parts of the earth&rsquo;s surface did not
+all witness the same events of a certain fixed series exactly at the
+same time.&nbsp; There had been an exhibition of dry land about the
+site of America, a little earlier than in Europe.</p>
+<p>Some features of the condition of the earth during the deposition
+of the carboniferous group, are made out with a clearness which must
+satisfy most minds.&nbsp; First we are told of a time when carbonate
+of lime was formed in vast abundance at the bottoms of profound seas,
+accompanied by an unusually large population of corals and encrinites;
+while in some parts of the earth there were patches of dry land, covered
+with a luxuriant vegetation.&nbsp; Next we have a comparatively brief
+period of volcanic disturbance, (when the conglomerate was formed.)&nbsp;
+Then the causes favourable to the so abundant production of limestone,
+and the large population of marine acrita, decline, and we find the
+masses of dry land increase in number and extent, and begin to bear
+an amount of forest vegetation, far exceeding that of the most sheltered
+tropical spots of the present surface.&nbsp; The climate, even in the
+latitude of Baffin&rsquo;s Bay, was torrid, and perhaps the atmosphere
+contained a larger charge of carbonic acid gas (the material of vegetation)
+than it now does.&nbsp; The forests or thickets of the period, included
+no species of plants now known upon earth.&nbsp; They mainly consisted
+of gigantic shrubs, which are either not represented by any existing
+types, or are akin to kinds which are now only found in small and lowly
+forms.&nbsp; That these forests grew upon a Polynesia, or multitude
+of small islands, is considered probable, from similar vegetation being
+now found in such situations within the tropics.&nbsp; With regard to
+the circumstances under which the masses of vegetable matter were transformed
+into successive coal strata, geologists are divided.&nbsp; From examples
+seen at the present day, at the mouths of such rivers as the Mississippi,
+which traverse extensive sylvan regions, and from other circumstances
+to be adverted to, it is held likely by some that the vegetable matter,
+the rubbish of decayed forests, was carried by rivers into estuaries,
+and there accumulated in vast natural rafts, until it sunk to the bottom,
+where an overlayer of sand or mud would prepare it for becoming a stratum
+of coal.&nbsp; Others conceive that the vegetation first went into the
+condition of a peat moss, that a sink in the level then exposed it to
+be overrun by the sea, and covered with a layer of sand or mud; that
+a subsequent uprise made the mud dry land, and fitted it to bear a new
+forest, which afterwards, like its predecessor, became a bed of peat;
+that, in short, by repetitions of this process, the alternate layers
+of coal, sandstone, and shale, constituting the carboniferous group,
+were formed.&nbsp; It is favourable to this last view that marine fossils
+are scarcely found in the body of the coal itself, though abundant in
+the shale layers above and below it; also that in several places erect
+stems of trees are found with their roots still fixed in the shale beds,
+and crossing the sandstone beds at almost right angles, shewing that
+these, at least, had not been drifted from their original situations.&nbsp;
+On the other hand, it is not easy to admit such repeated risings and
+sinkings of surface as would be required, on this hypothesis, to form
+a series of coal strata.&nbsp; Perhaps we may most safely rest at present
+with the supposition that coal has been formed under both classes of
+circumstances, though in the latter only as an exception to the former.</p>
+<p>Upwards of three hundred species of plants have been ascertained
+to exist in the coal formation; but it is not necessary to suppose that
+the whole contained in that system are now, or ever will be distinguished.&nbsp;
+Experiments shew that some great classes of plants become decomposed
+in water in a much less space of time than others, and it is remarkable
+that those which decompose soonest, are of the classes found most rare,
+or not at all, in the coal strata.&nbsp; It is consequently to be inferred
+that there may have been grasses and mosses at this era, and many species
+of trees, the remains of which had lost all trace of organic form before
+their substance sunk into the mass of which coal was formed.&nbsp; In
+speaking, therefore, of the vegetation of this period, we must bear
+in mind that it may have comprehended forms of which we have no memorial.</p>
+<p>Supposing, nevertheless, that, in the main, the ascertained vegetation
+of the coal system is that which grew at the time of its formation,
+it is interesting to find that the terrestrial botany of our globe begins
+with classes of comparatively simple forms and structure.&nbsp; In the
+ranks of the vegetable kingdom, the lowest place is taken by plants
+of cellular tissue, and which have no flowers, (<i>cryptogamia</i>,)
+as lichens, mosses, fungi, ferns, sea-weeds.&nbsp; Above these stand
+plants of vascular tissue, and bearing flowers, in which again there
+are two great subdivisions; first, plants having one seed-lobe, (<i>monocotyledons</i>,)
+and in which the new matter is added within, (<i>endogenous</i>,) of
+which the cane and palm are examples; second, plants having two seed-lobes,
+(<i>dicotyledons</i>,) and in which the new matter is added on the outside
+under the bark, (<i>exogenous</i>,) of which the pine, elm, oak, and
+most of the British forest-trees are examples; these subdivisions also
+ranking in the order in which they are here stated.&nbsp; Now it is
+clear that a predominance of these forms in succession marked the successive
+epochs developed by fossil geology; the simple abounding first, and
+the complex afterwards.</p>
+<p>Two-thirds of the plants of the carboniferous era are of the cellular
+or cryptogamic kind, a proportion which would probably be much increased
+if we knew the whole Flora of that era.&nbsp; The ascertained dicotyledons,
+or higher-class plants, are comparatively few in this formation; but
+it will be found that they constantly increased as the globe grew older.</p>
+<p>The master-form or type of the era was the <i>fern</i>, or breckan,
+of which about one hundred and thirty species have already been ascertained
+as entering into the composition of coal. <a name="citation84a"></a><a href="#footnote84a">{84a}</a>&nbsp;
+The fern is a plant which thrives best in warm, shaded, and moist situations.&nbsp;
+In tropical countries, where these conditions abound, there are many
+more species than in temperate climes, and some of these are arborescent,
+or of a tree-like size and luxuriance. <a name="citation84b"></a><a href="#footnote84b">{84b}</a>&nbsp;
+The ferns of the coal strata have been of this magnitude, and that without
+regard to the parts of the earth where they are found.&nbsp; In the
+coal of Baffin&rsquo;s Bay, of Newcastle, and of the torrid zone alike,
+are the fossil ferns arborescent, shewing clearly that, in that era,
+the present tropical temperature, or one even higher, existed in very
+high latitudes.</p>
+<p>In the swamps and ditches of England there grows a plant called the
+horse-tail (<i>equisetum</i>), having a succulent, erect, jointed stem,
+with slender leaves, and a scaly catkin at the top.&nbsp; A second large
+section of the plants of the carboniferous era were of this kind (<i>equisetace&aelig;</i>),
+but, like the fern, reaching the magnitudes of trees.&nbsp; While existing
+equiseta rarely exceed three feet in height, and the stems are generally
+under half an inch in diameter, their kindred, entombed in the coal
+beds, seem to have been generally fourteen or fifteen feet high, with
+stems from six inches to a foot in thickness.&nbsp; Arborescent plants
+of this family, like the arborescent ferns, now grow only in tropical
+countries, and their being found in the coal beds in all latitudes is
+consequently held as an additional proof, that at this era a warm climate
+was extended much farther to the north than at present.&nbsp; It is
+to be remarked that plants of this kind (forming two genera, the most
+abundant of which is the <i>calamites</i>) are only represented on the
+present surface by plants of the same <i>family</i>: the <i>species</i>
+which flourished at this era gradually lessen in number as we advance
+upwards in the series of rocks, and disappear before we arrive at the
+tertiary formation.</p>
+<p>The club-moss family (<i>lycopodiace&aelig;</i>) are other plants
+of the present surface, usually seen in a lowly and creeping form in
+temperate latitudes, but presenting species which rise to a greater
+magnitude within the tropics.&nbsp; Many specimens of this family are
+found in the coal beds; it is thought they have contributed more to
+the substance of the coal than any other family.&nbsp; But, like the
+ferns and equisetace&aelig;, they rise to a prodigious magnitude.&nbsp;
+The lepidodendra (so the fossil genus is called) have probably been
+from sixty-five to eighty feet in height, having at their base a diameter
+of about three feet, while their leaves measured twenty inches in length.&nbsp;
+In the forests of the coal era, the lepidodendra would enjoy the rank
+of firs in our forests, affording shade to the only less stately ferns
+and calamites.&nbsp; The internal structure of the stem, and the character
+of the seed-vessels, shew them to have been a link between single-lobed
+and double-lobed plants, a fact worthy of note, as it favours the idea
+that, in vegetable, as well as animal creation, a progress has been
+observed, in conformity with advancing conditions.&nbsp; It is also
+curious to find a missing link of so much importance in a genus of plants
+which has long ceased to have a living place upon earth.</p>
+<p>The other leading plants of the coal era are without representatives
+on the present surface, and their characters are in general less clearly
+ascertained.&nbsp; Amongst the most remarkable are - the <i>sigillaria</i>,
+of which large stems are very abundant, shewing that the interior has
+been soft, and the exterior fluted with separate leaves inserted in
+vertical rows along the flutings - and the <i>stigmaria</i>, plants
+apparently calculated to flourish in marshes or pools, having a short,
+thick, fleshy stem, with a dome-shaped top, from which sprung branches
+of from twenty to thirty feet long.&nbsp; Amongst monocotyledons were
+some palms, (<i>flabellaria</i> and <i>n&aelig;ggerathia</i>,) besides
+a few not distinctly assignable to any class.</p>
+<p>The dicotyledons of the coal are comparatively few, though on the
+present surface they are the most numerous sub-class.&nbsp; Besides
+some of doubtful affinity, (<i>annularia</i>, <i>asterophyllites</i>,
+&amp;c.,) there were a few of the pine family, which seem to have been
+the highest class of trees of this era, and are only as yet found in
+isolated cases, and in sandstone beds.&nbsp; The first discovered lay
+in the Craigleith quarry, near Edinburgh, and consisted of a stem about
+two feet thick, and forty-seven feet in length.&nbsp; Others have since
+been found, both in the same situation, and at Newcastle.&nbsp; Leaves
+and fruit being wanting, an ingenious mode of detecting the nature of
+these trees was hit upon by Mr. Witham of Lartington.&nbsp; Taking thin
+polished cross slices of the stem, and subjecting them to the microscope,
+he detected the structure of the wood to be that of a cone-bearing tree,
+by the presence of certain &ldquo;reticulations&rdquo; which distinguish
+that family, in addition to the usual radiating and concentric lines.&nbsp;
+That particular tree was concluded to be an araucaria, a species now
+found in Norfolk Island, in the South Sea, and in a few other remote
+situations.&nbsp; The conifer&aelig; of this era form the dawn of dicotyledenous
+trees, of which they may be said to be the simplest type, and to which,
+it has already been noticed, the lepidodendra are a link from the monocotyledons.&nbsp;
+The concentric rings of the Craigleith and other conifer&aelig; of this
+era have been mentioned.&nbsp; It is interesting to find in these a
+record of the changing seasons of those early ages, when as yet there
+were no human beings to observe time or tide.&nbsp; They are clearly
+traced; but it is observed that they are more slightly marked than is
+the case with their family at the present day, as if the changes of
+temperature had been within a narrower range.</p>
+<p>Such was the vegetation of the carbonigenous era, composed of forms
+at the bottom of the botanical scale, flowerless, fruitless, but luxuriant
+and abundant beyond what the most favoured spots on earth can now shew.&nbsp;
+The rigidity of the leaves of its plants, and the absence of fleshy
+fruits and farinaceous seeds, unfitted it to afford nutriment to animals;
+and, monotonous in its forms, and destitute of brilliant colouring,
+its sward probably unenlivened by any of the smaller flowering herbs,
+its shades uncheered by the hum of insects, or the music of birds, it
+must have been but a sombre scene to a human visitant.&nbsp; But neither
+man nor any other animals were then in existence to look for such uses
+or such beauties in this vegetation.&nbsp; It was serving other and
+equally important ends, clearing (probably) the atmosphere of matter
+noxious to animal life, and storing up mineral masses which were in
+long subsequent ages to prove of the greatest service to the human race,
+even to the extent of favouring the progress of its civilization.</p>
+<p>The animal remains of this era are not numerous, in comparison with
+those which go before, or those which come after.&nbsp; The mountain
+limestone, indeed, deposited at the commencement of it, abounds unusually
+in polypiaria and crinoidea; but when we ascend to the coal-beds themselves,
+the case is altered, and these marine remains altogether disappear.&nbsp;
+We have then only a limited variety of conchifers and shell mollusks,
+with fragments of a few species of fishes, and these are rarely or never
+found in the coal seams, but in the shales alternating with them.&nbsp;
+Some of the fishes are of a sauroid character, that is, partake of the
+nature of the lizard, a genus of the reptilia, a land class of animals,
+so that we may be said here to have the first approach to a kind of
+animals calculated to breathe the atmosphere.&nbsp; Such is the Megalichthys
+Hibbertii, found by Dr. Hibbert Ware, in a limestone bed of fresh-water
+origin, underneath the coal at Burdiehouse, near Edinburgh.&nbsp; Others
+of the same kind have been found in the coal measures in Yorkshire,
+and in the low coal shales at Manchester.&nbsp; This is no more than
+might be expected, as collections of fresh water now existed, and it
+is presumable that they would be peopled.&nbsp; The chief other fishes
+of the coal era are named pal&aelig;othrissum, pal&aelig;oniscus, diperdus.</p>
+<p>Coal strata are nearly confined to the group termed the carboniferous
+formation.&nbsp; Thin beds are not unknown afterwards, but they occur
+only as a rare exception.&nbsp; It is therefore thought that the most
+important of the conditions which allowed of so abundant a terrestrial
+vegetation, had ceased about the time when this formation was closed.&nbsp;
+The high temperature was not one of the conditions which terminated,
+for there are evidences of it afterwards; but probably the superabundance
+of carbonic acid gas supposed to have existed during this era was expended
+before its close.&nbsp; There can be little doubt that the infusion
+of a large dose of this gas into the atmosphere at the present day would
+be attended by precisely the same circumstances as in the time of the
+carboniferous formation.&nbsp; Land animal life would not have a place
+on earth; vegetation would be enormous; and coal strata would be formed
+from the vast accumulations of woody matter, which would gather in every
+sea, near the mouths of great rivers.&nbsp; On the exhaustion of the
+superabundance of carbonic acid gas, the coal formation would cease,
+and the earth might again become a suitable theatre of being for land
+animals.</p>
+<p>The termination of the carboniferous formation is marked by symptoms
+of volcanic violence, which some geologists have considered to denote
+the close of one system of things and the beginning of another.&nbsp;
+Coal beds generally lie in basins, as if following the curve of the
+bottom of seas.&nbsp; But there is no such basin which is not broken
+up into pieces, some of which have been tossed up on edge, others allowed
+to sink, causing the ends of strata to be in some instances many yards,
+and in a few several hundred feet, removed from the corresponding ends
+of neighbouring fragments.&nbsp; These are held to be results of volcanic
+movements below, the operation of which is further seen in numerous
+upbursts and intrusions of volcanic rock (trap).&nbsp; That these disturbances
+took place about the close of the formation, and not later, is shewn
+in the fact of the next higher group of strata being comparatively undisturbed.&nbsp;
+Other symptoms of this time of violence are seen in the beds of conglomerate
+which occur amongst the first strata above the coal.&nbsp; These, as
+usual, consist of fragments of the elder rocks, more or less worn from
+being tumbled about in agitated water, and laid down in a mud paste,
+afterwards hardened.&nbsp; Volcanic disturbances break up the rocks;
+the pieces are worn in seas; and a deposit of conglomerate is the consequence.&nbsp;
+Of porphyry, there are some such pieces in the conglomerate of Devonshire,
+three or four tons in weight.&nbsp; It is to be admitted for strict
+truth that, in some parts of Europe, the carboniferous formation is
+followed by superior deposits, without the appearance of such disturbances
+between their respective periods; but apparently this case belongs to
+the class of exceptions already noticed. <a name="citation93"></a><a href="#footnote93">{93}</a>&nbsp;
+That disturbance was general, is supported by the further and important
+fact of the destruction of many forms of organic being previously flourishing,
+particularly of the vegetable kingdom.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>ERA OF THE NEW RED SANDSTONE.&nbsp; TERRESTRIAL ZOOLOGY COMMENCES
+WITH REPTILES.&nbsp; FIRST TRACES OF BIRDS.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>The next volume of the rock series refers to an era distinguished
+by an event of no less importance than the commencement of land animals.&nbsp;
+The <i>New Red Sandstone System</i> is subdivided into groups, some
+of which are wanting in some places; they are pretty fully developed
+in the north of England, in the following ascending order:- 1.&nbsp;
+Lower red sandstone; 2.&nbsp; Magnesian limestone; 3.&nbsp; Red and
+white sandstones and conglomerate; 4.&nbsp; Variegated marls.&nbsp;
+Between the third and fourth there is, in Germany, another group, called
+the Muschelkalk, a word expressing a limestone full of shells.</p>
+<p>The first group, containing the conglomerates already adverted to,
+seems to have been produced during the time of disturbance which occurred
+so generally after the carbonigenous era.&nbsp; This new era is distinguished
+by a paucity of organic remains, as might partly be expected from the
+appearances of disturbance, and the red tint of the rocks, the latter
+being communicated by a solution of oxide of iron, a substance unfavourable
+to animal life.</p>
+<p>The second group is a limestone with an infusion of magnesia.&nbsp;
+It is developed less generally than some others, but occurs conspicuously
+in England and Germany.&nbsp; Its place, above the red sandstone, shews
+the recurrence of circumstances favourable to animal life, and we accordingly
+find in it not only zoophytes, conchifera, and a few tribes of fish,
+but some faint traces of land plants, and a new and startling appearance
+- a reptile of saurian (lizard) character, analogous to the now existing
+family called monitors.&nbsp; Remains of this creature are found in
+cupriferous (copper-bearing) slate connected with the mountain limestone,
+at Mansfield and Glucksbrunn, in Germany, which may be taken as evidence
+that dry land existed in that age near those places.&nbsp; The magnesia
+limestone is also remarkable as the last rock in which appears the lept&aelig;na,
+or producta, a conchifer of numerous species which makes a conspicuous
+appearance in all previous seas.&nbsp; It is likewise to be observed,
+that the fishes of this age, to the genera of which the names pal&aelig;oniscus,
+catopterus, platysomus, &amp;c., have been applied, vanish, and henceforth
+appear no more.</p>
+<p>The third group, chiefly sandstones, variously coloured according
+to the amount and nature of the metallic oxide infused into them, shews
+a recurrence of agitation, and a consequent diminution of the amount
+of animal life.&nbsp; In the upper part, however, of this group, there
+are abundant symptoms of a revival of proper conditions for such life.&nbsp;
+There are marl beds, the origin of which substance in decomposed shells
+is obvious; and in Germany, though not in England, here occurs the muschelkalk,
+containing numerous organic remains, (generally different from those
+of the magnesian limestone,) and noted for the specimens of land animals,
+which it is the first to present in any considerable abundance to our
+notice.</p>
+<p>These animals are of the vertebrate sub-kingdom, but of its lowest
+class next after fishes, - namely, reptiles, - a portion of the terrestrial
+tribes whose imperfect respiratory system perhaps fitted them for enduring
+an atmosphere not yet quite suitable for birds or mammifers. <a name="citation97"></a><a href="#footnote97">{97}</a>&nbsp;
+The specimens found in the muschelkalk are allied to the crocodile and
+lizard tribes of the present day, but in the latter instance are upon
+a scale of magnitude as much superior to present forms as the lepidodendron
+of the coal era was superior to the dwarf club-mosses of our time.&nbsp;
+These saurians also combine some peculiarities of structure of a most
+extraordinary character.</p>
+<p>The animal to which the name <i>ichthyosaurus</i> has been given,
+was as long as a young whale, and it was fitted for living in the water,
+though breathing the atmosphere.&nbsp; It had the vertebral column and
+general bodily form of a fish, but to that were added the head and breast-bone
+of a lizard, and the paddles of the whale tribes.&nbsp; The beak, moreover,
+was that of a porpoise, and the teeth were those of a crocodile.&nbsp;
+It must have been a most destructive creature to the fish of those early
+seas.</p>
+<p>The <i>plesiosaurus</i> was of similar bulk, with a turtle-like body
+and paddles, shewing that the sea was its element, but with a long serpent-like
+neck, terminating in a saurian head, calculated to reach prey at a considerable
+distance.&nbsp; These two animals, of which many varieties have been
+discovered, constituting distinct species, are supposed to have lived
+in the shallow borders of the seas of this and subsequent formations,
+devouring immense quantities of the finny tribes.&nbsp; It was at first
+thought that no creatures approaching them in character now inhabit
+the earth; but latterly Mr. Darwin has discovered, in the reptile-peopled
+Galapagos Islands, in the South Sea, a marine saurian from three to
+four feet long.</p>
+<p>The <i>megalosaurus</i> was an enormous lizard - a land creature,
+also carnivorous.&nbsp; The <i>pterodactyle</i> was another lizard,
+but furnished with wings to pursue its prey in the air, and varying
+in size between a cormorant and a snipe.&nbsp; Crocodiles abounded,
+and some of these were herbivorous.&nbsp; Such was the iguanodon, a
+creature of the character of the iguana of the Ganges, but reaching
+a hundred feet in length, or twenty times that of its modern representative.</p>
+<p>There were also numerous <i>tortoises</i>, some of them reaching
+a great size; and Professor Owen has found in Warwickshire some remains
+of an animal of the batrachian order, <a name="citation99"></a><a href="#footnote99">{99}</a>
+to which, from the peculiar form of the teeth, he has given the name
+of labyrinthidon.&nbsp; Thus, three of Cuvier&rsquo;s four orders of
+reptilia (<i>sauria</i>, <i>chelonia</i>, and <i>batrachia</i>) are
+represented in this formation, the serpent order (<i>ophidia</i>) being
+alone wanting.</p>
+<p>The variegated marl beds which constitute the uppermost group of
+the formation, present two additional genera of huge saurians, - the
+phytosaurus and mastodonsaurus.</p>
+<p>It is in the upper beds of the red sandstone that beds of salt first
+occur.&nbsp; These are sometimes of such thickness, that the mine from
+which the material has been excavated looks like a lofty church.&nbsp;
+We see in the present world no circumstances calculated to produce the
+formation of a bed of rock salt; yet it is not difficult to understand
+how such strata were formed in an age marked by ultra-tropical heat
+and frequent volcanic disturbances.&nbsp; An estuary, cut off by an
+upthrow of trap, or a change of level, and left to dry up under the
+heat of the sun, would quickly become the bed of a dense layer of rock
+salt.&nbsp; A second shift of level, or some other volcanic disturbance,
+connecting it again with the sea, would expose this stratum to being
+covered over with a layer of sand or mud, destined in time to form the
+next stratum of rock above it.</p>
+<p>The plants of this era are few and unobtrusive.&nbsp; Equiseta, calamites,
+ferns, Voltzia, and a few of the other families found so abundantly
+in the preceding formation, here present themselves, but in diminished
+size and quantity.</p>
+<p>This seems to be the proper place to advert to certain memorials
+of a peculiar and unexpected character respecting these early ages in
+the sandstones.&nbsp; So low as the bottom of the carboniferous system,
+slabs are found marked over a great extent of surface with that peculiar
+corrugation or wrinkling which the receding tide leaves upon a sandy
+beach when the sea is but slightly agitated; and not only are these
+ripple-marks, as they are called, found on the surfaces, but casts of
+them are found on the under sides of slabs lying above.&nbsp; The phenomena
+suggests the time when the sand ultimately formed into these stone slabs,
+was part of the beach of a sea of the carbonigenous era; when, left
+wavy by one tide, it was covered over with a thin layer of fresh sand
+by the next, and so on, precisely as such circumstances might be expected
+to take place at the present day.&nbsp; Sandstone surfaces, ripple-marked,
+are found throughout the subsequent formations: in those of the new
+red, at more than one place in England, they further bear impressions
+of rain-drops which have fallen upon them - the rain, of course, of
+the inconceivably remote age in which the sandstones were formed.&nbsp;
+In the Greensill sandstone, near Shrewsbury, it has even been possible
+to tell from what direction the shower came which impressed the sandy
+surface, the rims of the marks being somewhat raised on one side, exactly
+as might be expected from a slanting shower falling at this day upon
+one of our beaches.&nbsp; These facts have the same sort of interest
+as the season rings of the Craigleith conifers, as speaking of a parity
+between some of the familiar processes of nature in those early ages
+and our own.</p>
+<p>In the new red sandstone, impressions still more important in the
+inferences to which they tend, have been observed, - namely, the footmarks
+of various animals.&nbsp; In a quarry of this formation, at Corncockle
+Muir, in Dumfriesshire, where the slabs incline at an angle of thirty-eight
+degrees, the vestiges of an animal supposed to have been a tortoise
+are distinctly traced up and down the slope, as if the creature had
+had occasion to pass backwards and forwards in that direction only,
+possibly in its daily visits to the sea.&nbsp; Some slabs similarly
+impressed, in the Stourton quarries in Cheshire, are further marked
+with a shower of rain which we know must have fallen <i>afterwards</i>,
+for its little hollows are impressed in the footmarks also, though more
+slightly than on the rest of the surface, the comparative hardness of
+a trodden place having apparently prevented so deep an impression being
+made.&nbsp; At Hessberg, in Saxony, the vestiges of four distinct animals
+have been traced, one of them a web-footed animal of small size, considered
+as a congener of the crocodile; another, whose footsteps having a resemblance
+to an impression of a swelled human hand, has caused it to be named
+the <i>cheirotherium</i>.&nbsp; The footsteps of the cheirotherium have
+been found also in the Stourton quarries above mentioned.&nbsp; Professor
+Owen, who stands at the head of comparative anatomy in the present day,
+has expressed his belief that this last animal was the same batrachian
+of which he has found fragments in the new red sandstone of Warwickshire.&nbsp;
+At Runcorn, near Manchester, and elsewhere, have been discovered the
+tracks of an animal which Mr. Owen calls the rynchosaurus, uniting with
+the body of a reptile the beak and feet of a bird, and which clearly
+had been a <i>link</i> between these two classes.</p>
+<p>If geologists shall ultimately give their approbation to the inferences
+made from a recent discovery in America, we shall have the addition
+of perfect birds, though probably of a low type, to the animal forms
+of this era.&nbsp; It is stated to be in quarries of this rock, in the
+valley of Connecticut, that footprints have been found, apparently produced
+by birds of the order grall&aelig;, or waders.&nbsp; &ldquo;The footsteps
+appear in regular succession on the continuous track of an animal, in
+the act of walking or running, with the right and left foot always in
+their relative places.&nbsp; The distance of the intervals between each
+footstep on the same track is occasionally varied, but to no greater
+amount than may be explained by the bird having altered its pace.&nbsp;
+Many tracks of different individuals and different species are often
+found crossing each other, and crowded, like impressions of feet upon
+the shores of a muddy stream, where ducks and geese resort.&rdquo; <a name="citation103"></a><a href="#footnote103">{103}</a>&nbsp;
+Some of these prints indicate small animals, but others denote birds
+of what would now be an unusually large size.&nbsp; One animal, having
+a foot fifteen inches in length, (one-half more than that of the ostrich,)
+and a stride of from four to six feet, has been appropriately entitled,
+<i>ornithichnites giganteus.</i></p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>ERA OF THE OOLITE.&nbsp; COMMENCEMENT OF MAMMALIA.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>The chronicles of this period consist of a series of beds, mostly
+calcareous, taking their general name (<i>Oolite System</i>) from a
+conspicuous member of them - the oolite - a limestone composed of an
+aggregation of small round grains or spherules, and so called from its
+fancied resemblance to a cluster of eggs, or the roe of a fish.&nbsp;
+This texture of stone is novel and striking.&nbsp; It is supposed to
+be of chemical origin, each spherule being an aggregation of particles
+round a central nucleus.&nbsp; The oolite system is largely developed
+in England, France, Westphalia, and Northern Italy; it appears in Northern
+India and Africa, and patches of it exist in Scotland, and in the vale
+of the Mississippi.&nbsp; It may of course be yet discovered in many
+other parts of the world.</p>
+<p>The series, as shewn in the neighbourhood of Bath, is (beginning
+with the lowest) as follows:- 1.&nbsp; Lias, a set of strata variously
+composed of limestone, clay, marl, and shale, clay being predominant;
+2.&nbsp; Lower oolitic formation, including, besides the great oolite
+bed of central England, fullers&rsquo; earth beds, forest marble, and
+cornbrash; 3.&nbsp; Middle oolitic formation, composed of two sub-groups,
+the Oxford clay and coral rag, the latter being a mere layer of the
+works of the coral polype; 4.&nbsp; Upper oolitic formation, including
+what are called Kimmeridge clay and Portland oolite.&nbsp; In Yorkshire
+there is an additional group above the lias, and in Sutherlandshire
+there is another group above that again.&nbsp; In the wealds (moorlands)
+of Kent and Sussex, there is, in like manner, above the fourth of the
+Bath series, another additional group, to which the name of the <i>Wealden</i>
+has been given, from its situation, and which, composed of sandstones
+and clays, is subdivided into Purbeck beds, Hastings sand, and Weald
+clay.</p>
+<p>There are no particular appearances of disturbance between the close
+of the new red sandstone and the beginning of the oolite system, as
+far as has been observed in England.&nbsp; Yet there is a great change
+in the materials of the rocks of the two formations, shewing that while
+the bottoms of the seas of the one period had been chiefly arenaceous,
+those of the other were chiefly clayey and limy.&nbsp; And there is
+an equal difference between the two periods in respect of both botany
+and zoology.&nbsp; While the new red sandstone shews comparatively scanty
+traces of organic creation, those in the oolite are extremely abundant,
+particularly in the department of animals, and more particularly still
+of sea mollusca, which, it has been observed, are always the more conspicuous
+in proportion to the predominance of calcareous rocks.&nbsp; It is also
+remarkable that the animals of the oolitic system are entirely different
+in species from those of the preceding age, and that these species cease
+before the next.&nbsp; In this system we likewise find that uniformity
+over great space which has been remarked of the Faunas of earlier formations.&nbsp;
+&ldquo;In the equivalent deposits in the Himalaya Mountains, at Fernando
+Po, in the region north of the Cape of Good Hope, and in the Run of
+Cutch, and other parts of Hindostan, fossils have been discovered, which,
+as far as English naturalists who have seen them can determine, are
+undistinguishable from certain oolite and lias fossils of Europe.&rdquo;
+<a name="citation108a"></a><a href="#footnote108a">{108a}</a></p>
+<p>The dry land of this age presented cycade&aelig;, &ldquo;a beautiful
+class of plants between the palms and conifers, having a tall, straight
+trunk, terminating in a magnificent crown of foliage.&rdquo; <a name="citation108b"></a><a href="#footnote108b">{108b}</a>&nbsp;
+There were tree ferns, but in smaller proportion than in former ages;
+also equisetace&aelig;, lilia, and conifers.&nbsp; The vegetation was
+generally analogous to that of the Cape of Good Hope and Australia,
+which seems to argue a climate (we must remember, a universal climate)
+between the tropical and temperate.&nbsp; It was, however, sufficiently
+luxuriant in some instances to produce thin seams of coal, for such
+are found in the oolite formation of both Yorkshire and Sutherland.&nbsp;
+The sea, as for ages before, contained alg&aelig;, of which, however,
+only a few species have been preserved to our day.&nbsp; The lower classes
+of the inhabitants of the ocean were unprecedentedly abundant.&nbsp;
+The polypiaria were in such abundance as to form whole strata of themselves.&nbsp;
+The crinoidea and echinites were also extremely numerous.&nbsp; Shell
+mollusks, in hundreds of new species, occupied the bottoms of the seas
+of those ages, while of the swimming shell-fish, ammonites and belemnites,
+there were also many scores of varieties.&nbsp; The belemnite here calls
+for some particular notice.&nbsp; It commences in the oolite, and terminates
+in the next formation.&nbsp; It is an elongated, conical shell, terminating
+in a point, and having, at the larger end, a cavity for the residence
+of the animal, with a series of air-chambers below.&nbsp; The animal,
+placed in the upper cavity, could raise or depress itself in the water
+at pleasure by a pneumatic operation upon the entral air tube pervading
+its shell.&nbsp; Its tentacula, sent abroad over the summit of the shell,
+searched the sea for prey.&nbsp; The creature had an ink-bag, with which
+it could muddle the water around it, to protect itself from more powerful
+animals, and, strange to say, this has been found so well preserved
+that an artist has used it in one instance as a paint, wherewith to
+delineate the belemnite itself.</p>
+<p>The crustacea discovered in this formation are less numerous.&nbsp;
+There are many fishes, some of which (<i>acrodus</i>, <i>psammodus</i>,
+&amp;c.,) are presumed from remains of their palatal bones, to have
+been of the gigantic cartilaginous class, now represented by such as
+the cestraceon.&nbsp; It has been considered by Professor Owen as worthy
+of notice, that, the cestraceon being an inhabitant of the Australian
+seas, we have, in both the botany and ichthyology of this period, an
+analogy to that continent.&nbsp; The pycnodontes, (thick-toothed,) and
+lepidoides, (having thick scales,) are other families described by M.
+Agassiz as extensively prevalent.&nbsp; In the shallow waters of the
+oolitic formation, the ichthyosaurus, plesiosaurus, and other huge saurian
+carnivora of the preceding age, plied, in increased numbers, their destructive
+vocation. <a name="citation110"></a><a href="#footnote110">{110}</a>&nbsp;
+To them were added new genera, the cetiosaurus, mososaurus, and some
+others, all of similar character and habits.</p>
+<p>Land reptiles abounded, including species of the pterodactyle of
+the preceding age - tortoises, trionyces, crocodilians - and the pliosaurus,
+a creature which appears to have formed a link between the plesiosaurus
+and the crocodile.&nbsp; We know of at least six species of the flying
+saurian, the pterodactyle, in this formation.</p>
+<p>Now, for the first time, we find remains of insects, an order of
+animals not well calculated for fossil preservation, and which are therefore
+amongst the rarest of the animal tribes found in rocks, though they
+are the most numerous of all living families.&nbsp; A single libellula
+(dragon-fly) was found in the Stonesfield slate, a member of the lower
+oolitic group quarried near Oxford; and this was for several years the
+only specimen known to exist so early; but now many species have been
+found in a corresponding rock at Solenhofen, in Germany.&nbsp; It is
+remarkable that the remains of insects are found most plentifully near
+the remains of pterodactyles, to which undoubtedly they served as prey.</p>
+<p>The first glimpse of the highest class of the vertebrate sub-kingdom
+- <i>mammalia</i> - is obtained from the Stonesfield slate, where there
+has been found the jaw-bone of a quadruped evidently insectivorous,
+and inferred, from peculiarities in the structure of that small fragment,
+to have belonged to the marsupial family, (pouched animals).&nbsp; It
+may be observed, although no specimens of so high a class of animals
+as mammalia are found earlier, such may nevertheless have existed: the
+defect may be in our not having found them; but, other things considered,
+the probability is that heretofore there were no mammifers.&nbsp; It
+is an interesting circumstance that the first mammifers found should
+have belonged to the marsupialia, when the place of that order in the
+scale of creation is considered.&nbsp; In the imperfect structure of
+their brain, deficient in the organs connecting the two hemispheres
+- and in the mode of gestation, which is only in small part uterine
+- this family is clearly a link between the oviparous vertebrata (birds,
+reptiles, and fishes) and the higher mammifers.&nbsp; This is further
+established by their possessing a faint development of two canals passing
+from near the anus to the external surface of the viscera, which are
+fully possessed in reptiles and fishes, for the purpose of supplying
+aerated water to the blood circulating in particular vessels, but which
+are unneeded by mammifers.&nbsp; Such rudiments of organs in certain
+species which do not require them in any degree, are common in both
+the animal and vegetable kingdoms, but are always most conspicuous in
+families approaching in character to those classes to which the full
+organs are proper.&nbsp; This subject will be more particularly adverted
+to in the sequel.</p>
+<p>The highest part of the oolitic formation presents some phenomena
+of an unusual and interesting character, which demand special notice.&nbsp;
+Immediately above the upper oolitic group in Buckinghamshire, in the
+vicinity of Weymouth, and other situations, there is a thin stratum,
+usually called by workmen the <i>dirt-bed</i>, which appears, from incontestable
+evidence, to have been a soil, formed, like soils of the present day,
+in the course of time, upon a surface which had previously been the
+bottom of the sea.&nbsp; The dirt-bed contains exuvi&aelig; of tropical
+trees, accumulated through time, as the forest shed its honours on the
+spot where it grew, and became itself decayed.&nbsp; Near Weymouth there
+is a piece of this stratum, in which stumps of trees remain rooted,
+mostly erect or slightly inclined, and from one to three feet high;
+while trunks of the same forest, also silicified, lie imbedded on the
+surface of the soil in which they grew.</p>
+<p>Above this bed lie those which have been called the Wealden, from
+their full development in the Weald of Sussex; and these as incontestably
+argue that the dry land forming the dirt-bed had next afterwards become
+the area of brackish estuaries, or lakes partially connected with the
+sea; for the Wealden strata contain exuvi&aelig; of fresh-water tribes,
+besides those of the great saurians and chelonia.&nbsp; The area of
+this estuary comprehends the whole south-east province of England.&nbsp;
+A geologist thus confidently narrates the subsequent events: &ldquo;Much
+calcareous matter was first deposited [in this estuary], and in it were
+entombed myriads of shells, apparently analogous to those of the vivipara.&nbsp;
+Then came a thick envelope of sand, sometimes interstratified with mud;
+and, finally, muddy matter prevailed.&nbsp; The solid surface beneath
+the waters would appear to have suffered a long continued and gradual
+depression, which was as gradually filled, or nearly so, with transported
+matter; in the end, however, after a depression of several hundred feet,
+the sea again entered upon the area, not suddenly or violently - for
+the Wealden rocks pass gradually into the superincumbent cretaceous
+series - but so quietly, that the mud containing the remains of terrestrial
+and fresh-water creatures was tranquilly covered up by sands replete
+with marine exuvi&aelig;.&rdquo; <a name="citation114"></a><a href="#footnote114">{114}</a>&nbsp;
+A subsequent depression of the same area, to the depth of at least three
+hundred fathoms, is believed to have taken place, to admit of the deposition
+of the cretaceous beds lying above.</p>
+<p>From the scattered way in which remains of the larger terrestrial
+animals occur in the Wealden, and the intermixture of pebbles of the
+special appearance of those worn in rivers, it is also inferred that
+the estuary which once covered the south-east part of England was the
+mouth of a river of that far-descending class of which the Mississippi
+and Amazon are examples.&nbsp; What part of the earth&rsquo;s surface
+presented the dry land through which that and other similar rivers flowed,
+no one can tell for certain.&nbsp; It has been surmised, that the particular
+one here spoken of may have flowed from a point not nearer than the
+site of the present Newfoundland.&nbsp; Professor Philips has suggested,
+from the analogy of the mineral composition, that anciently elevated
+coal strata may have composed the dry land from which the sandy matters
+of these strata were washed.&nbsp; Such a deposit as the Wealden almost
+necessarily implies a local, not a general condition; yet it has been
+thought that similar strata and remains exist in the Pays de Bray, near
+Beauvais.&nbsp; This leads to the supposition that there may have been,
+in that age, a series of river-receiving estuaries along the border
+of some such great ocean as the Atlantic, of which that of modern Sussex
+is only an example.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>ERA OF THE CRETACEOUS FORMATION.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>The record of this period consists of a series of strata, in which
+chalk beds make a conspicuous appearance, and which is therefore called
+the cretaceous system or formation.&nbsp; In England, a long stripe,
+extending from Yorkshire to Kent, presents the cretaceous beds upon
+the surface, generally lying conformably upon the oolite, and in many
+instances rising into bold escarpments towards the west.&nbsp; The celebrated
+cliffs of Dover are of this formation.&nbsp; It extends into northern
+France, and thence north-westward into Germany, whence it is traced
+into Scandinavia and Russia.&nbsp; The same system exists in North America,
+and probably in other parts of the earth not yet geologically investigated.&nbsp;
+Being a marine deposit, it establishes that seas existed at the time
+of its formation on the tracts occupied by it, while some of its organic
+remains prove that, in the neighbourhood of those seas, there were tracts
+of dry land.</p>
+<p>The cretaceous formation in England presents beds chiefly sandy in
+the lowest part, chiefly clayey in the middle, and chiefly of chalk
+in the upper part, the chalk beds being never absent, which some of
+the lower are in several places.&nbsp; In the vale of the Mississippi,
+again, the true chalk is wholly, or all but wholly absent.&nbsp; In
+the south of England, the lower beds are, (reckoning from the lowest
+upwards), 1.&nbsp; <i>Shankland</i> or <i>greensand</i>, &ldquo;a triple
+alternation of sands and sandstones with clay;&rdquo; 2.&nbsp; Galt,
+&ldquo;a stiff blue or black clay, abounding in shells, which frequently
+possess a pearly lustre;&rdquo; 3.&nbsp; <i>Hard</i> chalk; 4.&nbsp;
+Chalk with flints; these two last being generally white, but in some
+districts red, and in others yellow.&nbsp; The whole are, in England,
+about 1200 feet thick, shewing the considerable depths of the ocean
+in which the deposits were made.</p>
+<p>Chalk is a carbonate of lime, and the manner of its production in
+such vast quantities was long a subject of speculation among geologists.&nbsp;
+Some light seemed to be thrown upon the subject a few years ago, when
+it was observed, that the detritus of coral reefs in the present tropical
+seas gave a powder, undistinguishable, when dried, from ordinary chalk.&nbsp;
+It then appeared likely that the chalk beds were the detritus of the
+corals which were in the oceans of that era.&nbsp; Mr. Darwin, who made
+some curious inquiries on this point, further suggested, that the matter
+might have intermediately passed through the bodies of worms and fish,
+such as feed on the corals of the present day, and in whose stomachs
+he has found impure chalk.&nbsp; This, however, cannot be a full explanation
+of the production of chalk, if we admit some more recent discoveries
+of Professor Ehrenberg.&nbsp; That master of microscopic investigation
+announces, that chalk is composed partly of &ldquo;inorganic particles
+of irregular elliptical structure and granular slaty disposition,&rdquo;
+and partly of shells of inconceivable minuteness, &ldquo;varying from
+the one-twelfth to the two hundred and eighty-eighth part of a line&rdquo;
+- a cubic inch of the substance containing above ten millions of them!&nbsp;
+The chalk of the north of Europe contains, he says, a larger proportion
+of the inorganic matter; that of the south, a larger proportion of the
+organic matter, being in some instances almost entirely composed of
+it.&nbsp; He has been able to classify many of these creatures, some
+of them being allied to the nautili, nummuli, cyprides, &amp;c.&nbsp;
+The shells of some are calcareous, of others siliceous.&nbsp; M. Ehrenberg
+has likewise detected microscopic sea-plants in the chalk.</p>
+<p>The distinctive feature of the uppermost chalk beds in England, is
+the presence of flint nodules.&nbsp; These are generally disposed in
+layers parallel to each other.&nbsp; It was readily presumed by geologists
+that these masses were formed by a chemical aggregation of particles
+of silica, originally held in solution in the mass of the chalk.&nbsp;
+But whence the silica in a substance so different from it?&nbsp; Ehrenberg
+suggests that it is composed of the siliceous coverings of a portion
+of the microscopic creatures, whose shells he has in other instances
+detected in their original condition.&nbsp; It is remarkable that the
+chalk <i>with</i> flint abounds in the north of Europe; that <i>without</i>
+flints in the south; while in the northern chalk siliceous animalcules
+are wanting, and in the southern present in great quantities.&nbsp;
+The conclusion seems but natural, that in the one case the siliceous
+exuvi&aelig; have been left in their original form; in the other dissolved
+chemically, and aggregated on the common principle of chemical affinity
+into nodules of flint, probably concentrating, in every instance, upon
+a piece of decaying organic matter, as has been the case with the nodules
+of ironstone in the earlier rocks, and the spherules of the oolite.</p>
+<p>What is more remarkable, M. Ehrenberg has ascertained that at least
+fifty-seven species of the microscopic animals of the chalk, being infusoria
+and calcareous-shelled polythalamia, are still found living in various
+parts of the earth.&nbsp; These species are the most abundant in the
+rock.&nbsp; Singly they are the most unimportant of all animals, but
+in the mass, forming as they do such enormous strata over a large part
+of the earth&rsquo;s surface, they have an importance greatly exceeding
+that of the largest and noblest of the beasts of the field.&nbsp; Moreover,
+these species have a peculiar interest, as the only specific types of
+that early age which are reproduced in the present day.&nbsp; Species
+of sea mollusks, of reptiles, and of mammifers, have been changed again
+and again, since the cretaceous era; and it is not till a long subsequent
+age that we find the first traces of any other of even the humblest
+species which now exist; but here have these humble infusoria and polythalamia
+kept their place on earth through all its revolutions since that time,
+- are we to say, safe in their very humility, which might adapt them
+to a greater variety of circumstances than most other animals, or are
+we required to look for some other explanation of the phenomenon?</p>
+<p>All the ordinary and more observable orders of the inhabitants of
+the sea, except the cetacea, have been found in the cretaceous formation
+- zoophytes, radiaria, mollusks, crustacea, (in great variety of species,)
+and fishes in smaller variety.&nbsp; In Europe, remains of the marine
+saurians have been found; they may be presumed to have become extinct
+in that part of the globe before this time, their place and destructive
+office being perhaps supplied by cartilaginous fishes, of which the
+teeth are found in great quantities.&nbsp; In America, however, remains
+of the plesiosaurus have been discovered in this part of the stratified
+series.&nbsp; The reptiles, too, so numerous in the two preceding periods,
+appear to have now much diminished in numbers.&nbsp; One, entitled the
+mos&aelig;saurus, seems to have held an intermediate place between the
+monitor and iguana, and to have been about twenty-five feet long, with
+a tail calculated to assist it powerfully in swimming.&nbsp; Crocodiles
+and turtles existed, and amongst the fishes were some of a saurian character.</p>
+<p>Fuci abounded in the seas of this era.&nbsp; Conferv&aelig; are found
+enclosed in flints.&nbsp; Of terrestrial vegetation, as of terrestrial
+animals, the specimens in the European area are comparatively rare,
+rendering it probable that there was no dry land near.&nbsp; The remains
+are chiefly of ferns, conifers, and cycade&aelig;, but in the two former
+cases we have only cones and leaves.&nbsp; There have been discovered
+many pieces of wood, containing holes drilled by the teredo, and thus
+shewing that they had been long drifted about in the ocean before being
+entombed at the bottom.</p>
+<p>The series in America corresponding to this, entitled the ferruginous
+sand formation, presents fossils generally identical with those of Europe,
+not excepting the fragments of drilled wood; shewing that, in this,
+as in earlier ages, there was a parity of conditions for animal life
+over a vast tract of the earth&rsquo;s surface.&nbsp; To European reptiles,
+the American formation adds a gigantic one, styled the saurodon, from
+the lizard-like character of its teeth.</p>
+<p>We have seen that footsteps of birds are considered to have been
+discovered in America, in the new red sandstone.&nbsp; Some similar
+isolated phenomena occur in the subsequent formations.&nbsp; Mr. Mantell
+discovered some bones of birds, apparently waders, in the Wealden.&nbsp;
+The immediate connexion of that set of birds with land, may account,
+of course, for their containing a terrestrial organic relic, which the
+marine beds above and below did not possess.&nbsp; In the slate of Glarus,
+in Switzerland, corresponding to the English galt, in the chalk formation,
+the remains of a bird have been found.&nbsp; From a chalk bed near Maidstone,
+have likewise been extracted some remains of a bird, supposed to have
+been of the long-winged swimmer family, and equal in size to the albatross.&nbsp;
+These, it must be owned, are less strong traces of the birds than we
+possess of the reptiles and other tribes; but it must be remembered,
+that the evidence of fossils, as to the absence of any class of animals
+from a certain period of the earth&rsquo;s history, can never be considered
+as more than negative.&nbsp; Animals, of which we find no remains in
+a particular formation, may, nevertheless, have lived at the time, and
+it may have only been from unfavourable circumstances that their remains
+have not been preserved for our inspection.&nbsp; The single circumstance
+of their being little liable to be carried down into seas, might be
+the cause of their non-appearance in our quarries.&nbsp; There is at
+the same time a limit to uncertainty on this point.&nbsp; We see, from
+what remains have been found in the whole series, a clear progress throughout,
+from humble to superior types of being.&nbsp; Hence we derive a light
+as to what animals may have existed at particular times, which is in
+some measure independent of the specialties of fossilology.&nbsp; The
+birds are below the mammalia in the animal scale; and therefore they
+may be supposed to have existed about the time of the new red sandstone
+and oolite, although we find but slight traces of them in those formations,
+and, it may be said, till a considerably later period.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>ERA OF THE TERTIARY FORMATION. - MAMMALIA ABUNDANT.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>The chalk-beds are the highest which extend over a considerable space;
+but in hollows of these beds, comparatively limited in extent, there
+have been formed series of strata - clays, limestones, marls, alternating
+- to which the name of the <i>Tertiary Formation</i> has been applied.&nbsp;
+London and Paris alike rest on basins of this formation, and another
+such basin extends from near Winchester, under Southampton, and re-appears
+in the Isle of Wight.&nbsp; There is a patch, or fragment of the formation
+in one of the Hebrides.&nbsp; A stripe of it extends along the east
+coast of North America, from Massachusetts to Florida.&nbsp; It is also
+found in Sicily and Italy, insensibly blended with formations still
+in progress.&nbsp; Though comparatively a local formation, it is not
+of the less importance as a record of the condition of the earth during
+a certain period.&nbsp; As in other formations, it is marked, in the
+most distant localities, by identity of organic remains.</p>
+<p>The hollows filled by the tertiary formation must be considered as
+the beds of estuaries left at the conclusion of the cretaceous period.&nbsp;
+We have seen that an estuary, either by the drifting up of its mouth,
+or a change of level in that quarter, may be supposed to have become
+an inland sheet of water, and that, by another change, of the reverse
+kind, it may be supposed to have become an estuary again.&nbsp; Such
+changes the Paris basin appears to have undergone oftener than once,
+for, first, we have there a fresh-water formation of clay and limestone
+beds; then, a marine-limestone formation; next, a second fresh water
+formation, in which the material of the celebrated <i>plaster of Paris</i>
+(gypsum) is included; then, a second marine formation of sandy and limy
+beds; and finally, a third series of fresh-water strata.&nbsp; Such
+alternations occur in other examples of the tertiary formation likewise.</p>
+<p>The tertiary beds present all but an entirely new set of animals,
+and as we ascend in the series, we find more and more of these identical
+with species still existing upon earth, as if we had now reached the
+dawn of the present state of the zoology of our planet.&nbsp; By the
+study of the shells alone, Mr. Lyell has been enabled to divide the
+whole term into four sub-periods, to which he has given names with reference
+to the proportions which they respectively present of surviving species
+- first, the eocene, (from &rsquo;&pi;&omega;&sigmaf;, the dawn; &chi;&alpha;&iota;&nu;&omicron;&sigmaf;,
+recent;) second, the miocene, (&mu;&epsilon;&iota;&omega;&nu;, less;)
+third, older pliocene, (&pi;&lambda;&epsilon;&iota;&omega;&nu;, more;)
+fourth, newer pliocene.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>EOCENE SUB-PERIOD.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>The eocene period presents, in three continental groups, 1238 species
+of shells, of which forty-two, or 3.5 per cent, yet flourish.&nbsp;
+Some of these are remarkable enough; but they all sink into insignificance
+beside the mammalian remains which the lower eocene deposits of the
+Paris basin present to us, shewing that the land had now become the
+theatre of an extensive creation of the highest class of animals.&nbsp;
+Cuvier ascertained about fifty species of these, all of them long since
+extinct.&nbsp; A considerable number are <i>pachydermata</i>, <a name="citation127"></a><a href="#footnote127">{127}</a>
+of a character approximating to the South American tapir: the names,
+pal&aelig;otherium, anthracotherium, anoplotherium, lophiodon, &amp;c.,
+have been applied to them with a consideration of more or less conspicuous
+peculiarities; but a description of the first may give some general
+idea of the whole.&nbsp; It was about the size of a horse, but more
+squat and clumsy, and with a heavier head, and a lower jaw shorter than
+the upper; the feet, also, instead of hooves, presented three large
+toes, rounded, and unprovided with claws.&nbsp; These animals were all
+herbivorous.&nbsp; Amongst an immense number of others are found many
+new reptiles, some of them adapted for fresh water; species of birds
+allied to the sea-lark, curlew, quail, buzzard, owl, and pelican; species
+allied to the dormouse and squirrel; also the opossum and racoon; and
+species allied to the genette, fox, and wolf.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>MIOCENE SUB-PERIOD.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>In the miocene sub-period, the shells give eighteen per cent. of
+existing species, shewing a considerable advance from the preceding
+era, with respect to the inhabitants of the sea.&nbsp; The advance in
+the land animals is less marked, but yet considerable.&nbsp; The predominating
+forms are still pachydermatous, and the tapir type continues to be conspicuous.&nbsp;
+One animal of this kind, called the <i>dinotherium</i>, is supposed
+to have been not less than eighteen feet long; it had a mole-like form
+of the shoulder-blade, conferring the power of digging for food, and
+a couple of tusks turning down from the lower jaw, by which it could
+have attached itself, like the walrus, to a shore or bank, while its
+body floated in the water.&nbsp; Dr. Buckland considers this and some
+similar miocene animals, as adapted for a semi-aquatic life, in a region
+where lakes abounded.&nbsp; Besides the tapirs, we have in this era
+animals allied to the glutton, the bear, the dog, the horse, the hog,
+and lastly, several felin&aelig;, (creatures of which the lion is the
+type;) all of which are new forms, as far as we know.&nbsp; There was
+also an abundance of marine mammalia, seals, dolphins, lamantins, walruses,
+and whales, none of which had previously appeared.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>PLIOCENE SUB-PERIOD.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>The shells of the older pliocene give from thirty-five to fifty;
+those of the newer, from ninety to ninety-five per cent. of existing
+species.&nbsp; The pachydermata of the preceding era now disappear,
+and are replaced by others belonging to still existing families - elephant,
+hippopotamus, rhinoceros - though now extinct as species.&nbsp; Some
+of these are startling, from their enormous magnitude.&nbsp; The great
+mastodon, whose remains are found in abundance in America, was a species
+of elephant, judged, from peculiarities of its teeth, to have lived
+on aquatic plants, and reaching the height of twelve feet.&nbsp; The
+mammoth was another elephant, but supposed to have survived till comparatively
+recent times, as a specimen, in all respects entire, was found in 1801,
+preserved in ice, in Siberia.&nbsp; We are more surprised by finding
+such gigantic proportions in an animal called the megatherium, which
+ranks in an order now assuming much humbler forms - the edentata - to
+which the sloth, ant-eater, and armadillo belong.&nbsp; The megatherium
+had a skeleton of enormous solidity, with an armour-clad body, and five
+toes, terminating in huge claws, wherewith to grasp the branches, from
+which, like its existing congener, the sloth, it derived its food.&nbsp;
+The megalonyx was a similar animal, only somewhat less than the preceding.&nbsp;
+Finally, the pliocene gives us for the first time, oxen, deer, camels,
+and other specimens of the <i>ruminantia.</i></p>
+<p>Such is an outline of the fauna of the tertiary era, as ascertained
+by the illustrious naturalists who first devoted their attention to
+it.&nbsp; It will be observed that it brings us up to the felin&aelig;,
+or carnivora, a considerably elevated point in the animal scale, but
+still leaving a blank for the quadrumana (monkeys) and for man, who
+collectively form, as will be afterwards seen, the first group in that
+scale.&nbsp; It sometimes happens, however, as we have seen, that a
+few rare traces of a particular class of animals are in time found in
+formations originally thought to be destitute of them, displaying as
+it were a dawn of that department of creation.&nbsp; Such seems to be
+the case with at least the quadrumana.&nbsp; A jaw-bone and tooth of
+an animal of this order, and belonging to the genus macacus, were found
+in the London clay, (eocene,) at Kyson, near Woodbridge, in 1839.&nbsp;
+Another jaw-bone, containing several teeth, supposed to have belonged
+to a species of monkey about three feet high, was discovered about the
+same time in a stratum of marl surmounted by compact limestone, in the
+department of Gers, at the foot of the Pyrenees.&nbsp; Associated with
+this last were remains of not less than thirty mammiferous quadrupeds,
+including three species of rhinoceros, a large anoplotherium, three
+species of deer, two antelopes, a true dog, a large cat, an animal like
+a weasel, a small hare, and a huge species of the edentata.&nbsp; Both
+of these places are considerably to the north of any region now inhabited
+by the monkey tribes.&nbsp; Fossil remains of quadrumana have been found
+in at least two other parts of the earth, - namely, the sub-Himalayan
+hills, near the Sutlej, and in Brazil, (both in the tertiary strata;)
+the first being a large species of semnopithecus, and the second, a
+still larger animal belonging to the American group of monkeys, but
+a new genus, and denominated by its discoverer, Dr. Lund, protopithecus.&nbsp;
+The latter would be four feet in height.</p>
+<p>One remarkable circumstance connected with the tertiary formation
+remains to be noticed, - namely, the prevalence of volcanic action at
+that era.&nbsp; In Auvergne, in Catalonia, near Venice, and in the vicinity
+of Rome and Naples, lavas exactly resembling the produce of existing
+volcanoes, are associated and intermixed with the lacustrine as well
+as marine tertiaries.&nbsp; The superficies of tertiaries in England
+is disturbed by two great swells, forming what are called anticlinal
+axes, one of which divides the London from the Hampshire basin, while
+the other passes through the Isle of Wight, both throwing the strata
+down at violent inclination towards the north, as if the subterranean
+disturbing force had <i>waved</i> forward in that direction.&nbsp; The
+Pyrenees, too, and Alps, have both undergone elevation since the deposition
+of the tertiaries; and in Sicily there are mountains which have risen
+three thousand feet since the deposition of some of the most recent
+of these rocks.&nbsp; The general effect of these operations was of
+course to extend the land surface, and to increase the variety of its
+features, thus improving the natural drainage, and generally adapting
+the earth for the reception of higher classes of animals.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>ERA OF THE SUPERFICIAL FORMATIONS.&nbsp; COMMENCEMENT OF PRESENT
+SPECIES.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>We have now completed our survey of the series of stratified rocks,
+and traced in their fossils the progress of organic creation down to
+a time which seems not long antecedent to the appearance of man.&nbsp;
+There are, nevertheless, monuments of still another era or space of
+time which it is all but certain did also precede that event.</p>
+<p>Over the rock formations of all eras, in various parts of the globe,
+but confined in general to situations not very elevated, there is a
+layer of stiff clay, mostly of a blue colour, mingled with fragments
+of rock of all sizes, travel-worn, and otherwise, and to which geologists
+give the name of diluvium, as being apparently the produce of some vast
+flood, or of the sea thrown into an unusual agitation.&nbsp; It seems
+to indicate that, at the time when it was laid down, much of the present
+dry land was under the ocean, a supposition which we shall see supported
+by other evidence.&nbsp; The included masses of rock have been carefully
+inspected in many places, and traced to particular parent beds at considerable
+distances.&nbsp; Connected with these phenomena are certain rock surfaces
+on the slopes of hills and elsewhere, which exhibit groovings and scratchings,
+such as we might suppose would be produced by a quantity of loose blocks
+hurried along over them by a flood.&nbsp; Another associated phenomenon
+is that called <i>crag and tail</i>, which exists in many places, -
+namely, a rocky mountain, or lesser elevation, presenting on one side
+the naked rock in a more or less abrupt form, and on the other a gentle
+slope; the sites of Windsor, Edinburgh, and Stirling, with their respective
+castles, are specimens of crag and tail.&nbsp; Finally, we may advert
+to certain long ridges of clay and gravel which arrest the attention
+of travellers on the surface of Sweden and Finland, and which are also
+found in the United States, where, indeed, the whole of these phenomena
+have been observed over a large surface, as well as in Europe.&nbsp;
+It is very remarkable that the direction from which the diluvial blocks
+have generally come, the lines of the grooved rock surfaces, the direction
+of the crag and tail eminences, and that of the clay and gravel ridges
+- phenomena, be it observed, extending over the northern parts of both
+Europe and America - are <i>all from the north and north-west towards
+the south-east</i>.&nbsp; We thus acquire the idea of a powerful current
+moving in a direction from north-west to south-east, carrying, besides
+mud, masses of rock which furrowed the solid surfaces as they passed
+along, abrading the north-west faces of many hills, but leaving the
+slopes in the opposite direction uninjured, and in some instances forming
+long ridges of detritus along the surface.&nbsp; These are curious considerations,
+and it has become a question of much interest, by what means, and under
+what circumstances, was such a current produced.&nbsp; One hypothetical
+answer has some plausibility about it.&nbsp; From an investigation of
+the nature of glaciers, and some observations which seem to indicate
+that these have at one time extended to lower levels, and existed in
+regions (the Scottish Highlands an example) where there is now no perennial
+snow, it has been surmised that there was a time, subsequent to the
+tertiary era, when the circumpolar ice extended far into the temperate
+zone, and formed a lofty, as well as extensive accumulation.&nbsp; A
+change to a higher temperature, producing a sudden thaw of this mass,
+might set free such a quantity of water as would form a large flood,
+and the southward flow of this deluge, joined to the direction which
+it would obtain from the rotatory motion of the globe, would of course
+produce that compound or south-easterly direction which the phenomena
+require.&nbsp; All of these speculations are as yet far too deficient
+in facts to be of much value; and I must freely own that, for one, I
+attach little importance to them.&nbsp; All that we can legitimately
+infer from the diluvium is, that the northern parts of Europe and America
+were then under the sea, and that a strong current set over them.</p>
+<p>Connected with the diluvium is the history of <i>ossiferous caverns</i>,
+of which specimens singly exist at Kirkdale in Yorkshire, Gailenreuth
+in Franconia, and other places.&nbsp; They occur in the calcareous strata,
+as the great caverns generally do, but have in all instances been naturally
+closed up till the recent period of their discovery.&nbsp; The floors
+are covered with what appears to be a bed of the diluvial clay, over
+which rests a crust of stalagmite, the result of the droppings from
+the roof since the time when the clay-bed was laid down.&nbsp; In the
+instances above specified, and several others, there have been found,
+under the clay bed, assemblages of the bones of animals, of many various
+kinds.&nbsp; At Kirkdale, for example, the remains of twenty-four species
+were ascertained - namely, pigeon, lark, raven, duck, and partridge;
+mouse, water-rat, rabbit, hare, deer, (three species,) ox, horse, hippopotamus,
+rhinoceros, elephant, weazel, fox, wolf, bear, tiger, hyena.&nbsp; From
+many of the bones of the gentler of these animals being found in a broken
+state, it is supposed that the cave was a haunt of hyenas and other
+predaceous animals, by which the smaller ones were here consumed.&nbsp;
+This must have been at a time antecedent to the submersion which produced
+the diluvium, since the bones are covered by a bed of that formation.&nbsp;
+It is impossible not to see here a very natural series of incidents.&nbsp;
+First, the cave is frequented by wild beasts, who make it a kind of
+charnel-house.&nbsp; Then, submerged in the current which has been spoken
+of, it receives a clay flooring from the waters containing that matter
+in suspension.&nbsp; Finally, raised from the water, but with no mouth
+to the open air, it remains unintruded on for a long series of ages,
+during which the clay flooring receives a new calcareous covering, from
+the droppings of the roof.&nbsp; Dr. Buckland, who examined and described
+the Kirkdale cave, was at first of opinion that it presented a physical
+evidence of the Noachian deluge; but he afterwards saw reason to consider
+its phenomena as of a time far apart from that event, which rests on
+evidence of an entirely different kind.</p>
+<p>Our attention is next drawn to the erratic blocks or boulders, which
+in many parts of the earth are thickly strewn over the surface, particularly
+in the north of Europe.&nbsp; Some of these blocks are many tons in
+weight, yet are clearly ascertained to have belonged originally to situations
+at a great distance.&nbsp; Fragments, for example, of the granite of
+Shap Fell are found in every direction around to the distance of fifty
+miles, one piece being placed high upon Criffel Mountain, on the opposite
+side of the Solway estuary; so also are fragments of the Alps found
+far up the slopes of the Jura.&nbsp; There are even blocks on the east
+coast of England, supposed to have travelled from Norway.&nbsp; The
+only rational conjecture which can be formed as to the transport of
+such masses from so great a distance, is one which presumes them to
+have been carried and dropped by icebergs, while the space between their
+original and final sites was under ocean.&nbsp; Icebergs do even now
+carry off such masses from the polar coasts, which, falling when the
+retaining ice melts, must take up situations at the bottom of the sea
+analogous to those in which we find the erratic blocks of the present
+day.</p>
+<p>As the diluvium and erratic blocks clearly suppose one last long
+submersion of the surface, (<i>last</i>, geologically speaking,) there
+is another set of appearances which as manifestly shew the steps by
+which the land was made afterwards to reappear.&nbsp; These consist
+of <i>terraces</i>, which have been detected near, and at some distance
+inland from, the coast lines of Scandinavia, Britain, America, and other
+regions; being evidently ancient beaches, or platforms, on which the
+margin of the sea at one time rested.&nbsp; They have been observed
+at different heights above the present sea-level, from twenty to above
+twelve hundred feet; and in many places they are seen rising above each
+other in succession, to the number of three, four, and even more.&nbsp;
+The smooth flatness of these terraces, with generally a slight inclination
+towards the sea, the sandy composition of many of them, and, in some
+instances, the preservation of marine shells in the ground, identify
+them perfectly with existing sea-beaches, notwithstanding the cuts and
+scoopings which have every here and there been effected in them by water-courses.&nbsp;
+The irresistible inference from the phenomena is, that the highest was
+first the coast line; then an elevation took place, and the second highest
+became so, the first being now raised into the air and thrown inland.&nbsp;
+Then, upon another elevation, the sea began to form, at its new point
+of contact with the land, the third highest beach, and so on down to
+the platform nearest to the present sea-beach.&nbsp; Phenomena of this
+kind become comparatively familiar to us, when we hear of evidence that
+the last sixty feet of the elevation of Sweden, and the last eighty-five
+of that of Chili, have taken place since man first dwelt in those countries;
+nay, that the elevation of the former country goes on at this time at
+the rate of about forty-five inches in a century, and that a thousand
+miles of the Chilian coast rose four feet in one night, under the influence
+of a powerful earthquake, so lately as 1822.&nbsp; Subterranean forces,
+of the kind then exemplified in Chili, supply a ready explanation of
+the whole phenomena, though some other operating causes have been suggested.&nbsp;
+In an inquiry on this point, it becomes of consequence to learn some
+particulars respecting the levels.&nbsp; Taking a particular beach,
+it is generally observed that the level continues the same along a considerable
+number of miles, and nothing like breaks or hitches has as yet been
+detected in any case.&nbsp; A second and a third beach are also observed
+to be exactly parallel to the first.&nbsp; These facts would seem to
+indicate quiet elevating movements, uniform over a large tract.&nbsp;
+It must, however, be remarked that the raised beaches at one part of
+a coast rarely coincide with those at another part forty or fifty miles
+off.&nbsp; We might suppose this to indicate a limit in that extent
+of the uniformity of the elevating cause, but it would be rash to conclude
+positively that such is the case.&nbsp; In the present sea, as is well
+known, there are different levels at different places, owing to the
+operation of peculiar local causes, as currents, evaporation, and the
+influx of large rivers into narrow-mouthed estuaries.&nbsp; The differences
+of level in the ancient beaches might be occasioned by some such causes.&nbsp;
+But, whatever doubt may rest on this minor point, enough has been ascertained
+to settle the main one, that we have in these platforms indubitable
+monuments of the last rise of the land from the sea, and the concluding
+great event of the geological history.</p>
+<p>The idea of such a wide-spread and possibly universal submersion
+unavoidably suggests some considerations as to the effect which it might
+have upon terrestrial animal life.&nbsp; It seems likely that this would
+be, on such an occasion, extensively, if not universally destroyed.&nbsp;
+Nor does the idea of its universal destruction seem the less plausible,
+when we remark, that none of the species of land animals heretofore
+discovered can be detected at a subsequent period.&nbsp; The whole seem
+to have been now changed.&nbsp; Some geologists appear much inclined
+to think that there was at this time a new development of terrestrial
+animal life upon the globe, and M. Agassiz, whose opinion on such a
+subject must always be worthy of attention, speaks all but decidedly
+for such a conclusion.&nbsp; It must, however, be owned, that proofs
+for it are still scanty, beyond the bare fact of a submersion which
+appears to have had a very wide range.&nbsp; I must therefore be content
+to leave this point, as far as geological evidence is concerned, for
+future affirmation.</p>
+<p>There are some other superficial deposits, of less consequence on
+the present occasion than the diluvium - namely, lacustrine deposits,
+or filled-up lakes; alluvium, or the deposits of rivers beside their
+margins; deltas, the deposits made by great ones at their efflux into
+the sea; peat mosses; and the vegetable soil.&nbsp; The animal remains
+found in these generally testify to a zoology on the verge of that which
+still exists, or melting into it, there being included many species
+which still exist.&nbsp; In a lacustrine deposit at Market-Weighton,
+in the Vale of York, there have been found bones of the elephant, rhinoceros,
+bison, wolf, horse, felis, deer, birds, all or nearly all extinct species;
+associated with thirteen species of land and fresh water shells, &ldquo;exactly
+identical with types now living in the vicinity.&rdquo;&nbsp; In similar
+deposits in North America, are remains of the mammoth, mastodon, buffalo,
+and other animals of extinct and living types.&nbsp; In short, these
+superficial deposits shew precisely such remains as might be expected
+from a time at which the present system of things (to use a vague but
+not unexpressive phrase) obtained, but yet so far remote in chronology
+as to allow of the dropping of many species, through familiar causes,
+in the interval.&nbsp; Still, however, there is no authentic or satisfactory
+instance of human remains being found, except in deposits obviously
+of very modern date; a tolerably strong proof that the creation of our
+own species is a comparatively recent event, and one posterior (generally
+speaking) to all the great natural transactions chronicled by geology.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS RESPECTING THE ORIGIN OF THE ANIMATED TRIBES.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>Thus concludes the wondrous chapter of the earth&rsquo;s history
+which is told by geology.&nbsp; It takes up our globe at the period
+when its original incandescent state had nearly ceased; conducts it
+through what we have every reason to believe were vast, or at least
+very considerable, spaces of time, in the course of which many superficial
+changes took place, and vegetable and animal life was gradually developed;
+and drops it just at the point when man was apparently about to enter
+on the scene.&nbsp; The compilation of such a history, from materials
+of so extraordinary a character, and the powerful nature of the evidence
+which these materials afford, are calculated to excite our admiration,
+and the result must be allowed to exalt the dignity of science, as a
+product of man&rsquo;s industry and his reason.</p>
+<p>If there is any thing more than another impressed on our minds by
+the course of the geological history, it is, that the same laws and
+conditions of nature now apparent to us have existed throughout the
+whole time, though the operation of some of these laws may now be less
+conspicuous than in the early ages, from some of the conditions having
+come to a settlement and a close.&nbsp; That seas have flowed and ebbed,
+and winds disturbed their surfaces, in the time of the secondary rocks,
+we have proof on the yet preserved surfaces of the sands which constituted
+margins of the seas in those days.&nbsp; Even the fall of wind-slanted
+rain is evidenced on the same tablets.&nbsp; The washing down of detached
+matter from elevated grounds, which we see rivers constantly engaged
+in at the present time, and which is daily shallowing the seas adjacent
+to their mouths, only appears to have proceeded on a greater scale in
+earlier epochs.&nbsp; The volcanic subterranean force, which we see
+belching forth lavas on the sides of mountains, and throwing up new
+elevations by land and sea, was only more powerfully operative in distant
+ages.&nbsp; To turn to organic nature, vegetation seems to have proceeded
+then exactly as now.&nbsp; The very alternations of the seasons has
+been read in unmistakable characters in sections of the trees of those
+days, precisely as it might be read in a section of a tree cut down
+yesterday.&nbsp; The system of prey amongst animals flourished throughout
+the whole of the pre-human period; and the adaptation of all plants
+and animals to their respective spheres of existence was as perfect
+in those early ages as it is still.</p>
+<p>But, as has been observed, the operation of the laws may be modified
+by conditions.&nbsp; At one early age, if there was any dry land at
+all, it was perhaps enveloped in an atmosphere unfit for the existence
+of terrestrial animals, and which had to go though some changes before
+that condition was altered.&nbsp; In the carbonigenous era, dry land
+seems to have consisted only of clusters of islands, and the temperature
+was much above what now obtains at the same places.&nbsp; Volcanic forces,
+and perhaps also the disintegrating power, seem to have been on the
+decrease since the first, or we have at least long enjoyed an exemption
+from such paroxysms of the former, as appear to have prevailed at the
+close of the coal formation in England and throughout the tertiary era.&nbsp;
+The surface has also undergone a gradual progress by which it has become
+always more and more variegated, and thereby fitted for the residence
+of a higher class of animals.</p>
+<p>In pursuing the progress of the development of both plants and animals
+upon the globe, we have seen an advance in both cases, along the line
+leading to the higher forms of organization.&nbsp; Amongst plants, we
+have first sea-weeds, afterwards land plants; and amongst these the
+simpler (cellular and cryptogamic) before the more complex.&nbsp; In
+the department of zoology, we see zoophytes, radiata, mollusca, articulata,
+existing for ages before there were any higher forms.&nbsp; The first
+step forward gives fishes, the humblest class of the vertebrata; and,
+moreover, the earliest fishes partake of the character of the next lowest
+sub-kingdom, the articulata.&nbsp; Afterwards come land animals, of
+which the first are reptiles, universally allowed to be the type next
+in advance from fishes, and to be connected with these by the links
+of an insensible gradation.&nbsp; From reptiles we advance to birds,
+and thence to mammalia, which are commenced by marsupialia, acknowledgedly
+low forms in their class.&nbsp; That there is thus a progress of some
+kind, the most superficial glance at the geological history is sufficient
+to convince us.&nbsp; Indeed the doctrine of the gradation of animal
+forms has received a remarkable support from the discoveries of this
+science, as several types formerly wanting to a completion of the series
+have been found in a fossil state. <a name="citation149"></a><a href="#footnote149">{149}</a></p>
+<p>It is scarcely less evident, from the geological record, that the
+progress of organic life has observed some correspondence with the progress
+of physical conditions on the surface.&nbsp; We do not know for certain
+that the sea, at the time when it supported radiated, molluscous, and
+articulated families, was incapable of supporting fishes; but causes
+for such a limitation are far from inconceivable.&nbsp; The huge saurians
+appear to have been precisely adapted to the low muddy coasts and sea
+margins of the time when they flourished.&nbsp; Marsupials appear at
+the time when the surface was generally in that flat, imperfectly variegated
+state in which we find Australia, the region where they now live in
+the greatest abundance, and one which has no higher native mammalian
+type.&nbsp; Finally, it was not till the land and sea had come into
+their present relations, and the former, in its principal continents,
+had acquired the irregularity of surface necessary for man, that man
+appeared.&nbsp; We have likewise seen reason for supposing that land
+animals could not have lived before the carbonigenous era, owing to
+the great charge of carbonic acid gas presumed to have been contained
+in the atmosphere down to that time.&nbsp; The surplus of this having
+gone, as M. Brogniart suggests, to form the vegetation, whose ruins
+became coal, and the air being thus brought to its present state, land
+animals immediately appeared.&nbsp; So also, sea-plants were at first
+the only specimens of vegetation, because there appears to have been
+no place where other plants could be produced or supported.&nbsp; Land
+vegetation followed, at first simple, afterwards complex, probably in
+conformity with an advance of the conditions required by the higher
+class of plants.&nbsp; In short, we see everywhere throughout the geological
+history, strong traces of a parallel advance of the physical conditions
+and the organic forms.</p>
+<p>In examining the fossils of the lower marine creation, with a reference
+to the kind of rock in connexion, with which they are found, it is observed
+that some strata are attended by a much greater abundance of both species
+and individuals than others.&nbsp; They abound most in calcareous rocks,
+which is precisely what might be expected, since lime is necessary for
+the formation of the shells of the mollusks and articulata, and the
+hard substance of the crinoidea and corals; next in the carboniferous
+series; next in the tertiary; next in the new red sandstone; next in
+slates; and lastly, least of all, in the primary rocks. <a name="citation151"></a><a href="#footnote151">{151}</a>&nbsp;
+This may have been the case without regard to the origination of new
+species, but more probably it was otherwise; or why, for instance, should
+the polypiferous zoophyta be found almost exclusively in the limestones?&nbsp;
+There are, indeed, abundant appearances as if, throughout all the changes
+of the surface, the various kinds of organic life invariably <i>pressed
+in</i>, immediately on the specially suitable conditions arising, so
+that no place which could support any form of organic being might be
+left for any length of time unoccupied.&nbsp; Nor is it less remarkable
+how various species are withdrawn from the earth, when the proper conditions
+for their particular existence are changed.&nbsp; The trilobite, of
+which fifty species existed during the earlier formations, was extirpated
+before the secondary had commenced, and appeared no more.&nbsp; The
+ammonite does not appear above the chalk.&nbsp; The species, and even
+genera of all the early radiata and mollusks were exchanged for others
+long ago.&nbsp; Not one species of any creature which flourished before
+the tertiary (Ehrenberg&rsquo;s infusoria excepted) now exists; and
+of the mammalia which arose during that series, many forms are altogether
+gone, while of others we have now only kindred species.&nbsp; Thus to
+find not only frequent additions to the previously existing forms, but
+frequent withdrawals of forms which had apparently become inappropriate
+- a constant shifting as well as advance - is a fact calculated very
+forcibly to arrest attention.</p>
+<p>A candid consideration of all these circumstances can scarcely fail
+to introduce into our minds a somewhat different idea of organic creation
+from what has hitherto been generally entertained.&nbsp; That God created
+animated beings, as well as the terraqueous theatre of their being,
+is a fact so powerfully evidenced, and so universally received, that
+I at once take it for granted.&nbsp; But in the particulars of this
+so highly supported idea, we surely here see cause for some re-consideration.&nbsp;
+It may now be inquired, - In what way was the creation of animated beings
+effected?&nbsp; The ordinary notion may, I think, be not unjustly described
+as this, - that the Almighty author produced the progenitors of all
+existing species by some sort of personal or immediate exertion.&nbsp;
+But how does this notion comport with what we have seen of the gradual
+advance of species, from the humblest to the highest?&nbsp; How can
+we suppose an immediate exertion of this creative power at one time
+to produce zoophytes, another time to add a few marine mollusks, another
+to bring in one or two conchifers, again to produce crustaceous fishes,
+again perfect fishes, and so on to the end?&nbsp; This would surely
+be to take a very mean view of the Creative Power - to, in short, anthropomorphize
+it, or reduce it to some such character as that borne by the ordinary
+proceedings of mankind.&nbsp; And yet this would be unavoidable; for
+that the organic creation was thus progressive through a long space
+of time, rests on evidence which nothing can overturn or gainsay.&nbsp;
+Some other idea must then be come to with regard to <i>the mode</i>
+in which the Divine Author proceeded in the organic creation.&nbsp;
+Let us seek in the history of the earth&rsquo;s formation for a new
+suggestion on this point.&nbsp; We have seen powerful evidence, that
+the construction of this globe and its associates, and inferentially
+that of all the other globes of space, was the result, not of any immediate
+or personal exertion on the part of the Deity, but of natural laws which
+are expressions of his will.&nbsp; What is to hinder our supposing that
+the organic creation is also a result of natural laws, which are in
+like manner an expression of his will?&nbsp; More than this, the fact
+of the cosmical arrangements being an effect of natural laws is a powerful
+argument for the organic arrangements being so likewise, for how can
+we suppose that the august Being who brought all these countless worlds
+into form by the simple establishment of a natural principle flowing
+from his mind, was to interfere personally and specially on every occasion
+when a new shell-fish or reptile was to be ushered into existence on
+<i>one</i> of these worlds?&nbsp; Surely this idea is too ridiculous
+to be for a moment entertained.</p>
+<p>It will be objected that the ordinary conceptions of Christian nations
+on this subject are directly derived from Scripture, or, at least, are
+in conformity with it.&nbsp; If they were clearly and unequivocally
+supported by Scripture, it may readily be allowed that there would be
+a strong objection to the reception of any opposite hypothesis.&nbsp;
+But the fact is, however startling the present announcement of it may
+be, that the first chapter of the Mosaic record is not only not in harmony
+with the ordinary ideas of mankind respecting cosmical and organic creation,
+but is opposed to them, and only in accordance with the views here taken.&nbsp;
+When we carefully peruse it with awakened minds, we find that all the
+procedure is represented primarily and pre-eminently as flowing <i>from
+commands and expressions of will</i>, <i>not from direct acts</i>.&nbsp;
+Let there be light - let there be a firmament - let the dry land appear
+- let the earth bring forth grass, the herb, the tree - let the waters
+bring forth the moving creature that hath life - let the earth bring
+forth the living creature after his kind - these are the terms in which
+the principal acts are described.&nbsp; The additional expressions,
+- God made the firmament - God made the beast of the earth, &amp;c.,
+occur subordinately, and only in a few instances; they do not necessarily
+convey a different idea of the mode of creation, and indeed only appear
+as alternative phrases, in the usual duplicative manner of Eastern narrative.&nbsp;
+Keeping this in view, the words used in a subsequent place, &ldquo;God
+<i>formed</i> man in his own image,&rdquo; cannot well be understood
+as implying any more than what was implied before, - namely, that man
+was produced in consequence of an expression of the Divine will to that
+effect.&nbsp; Thus, the scriptural objection quickly vanishes, and the
+prevalent ideas about the organic creation appear only as a mistaken
+inference from the text, formed at a time when man&rsquo;s ignorance
+prevented him from drawing therefrom a just conclusion.&nbsp; At the
+same time, I freely own that I do not think it right to adduce the Mosaic
+record, either in objection to, or support of any natural hypothesis,
+and this for many reasons, but particularly for this, that there is
+not the least appearance of an intention in that book to give philosophically
+exact views of nature.</p>
+<p>To a reasonable mind the Divine attributes must appear, not diminished
+or reduced in any way, by supposing a creation by law, but infinitely
+exalted.&nbsp; It is the narrowest of all views of the Deity, and characteristic
+of a humble class of intellects, to suppose him acting constantly in
+particular ways for particular occasions.&nbsp; It, for one thing, greatly
+detracts from his foresight, the most undeniable of all the attributes
+of Omnipotence.&nbsp; It lowers him towards the level of our own humble
+intellects.&nbsp; Much more worthy of him it surely is, to suppose that
+all things have been commissioned by him from the first, though neither
+is he absent from a particle of the current of natural affairs in one
+sense, seeing that the whole system is continually supported by his
+providence.&nbsp; Even in human affairs, if I may be allowed to adopt
+a familiar illustration, there is a constant progress from specific
+action for particular occasions, to arrangements which, once established,
+shall continue to answer for a great multitude of occasions.&nbsp; Such
+plans the enlightened readily form for themselves, and conceive as being
+adopted by all who have to attend to a multitude of affairs, while the
+ignorant suppose every act of the greatest public functionary to be
+the result of some special consideration and care on his part alone.&nbsp;
+Are we to suppose the Deity adopting plans which harmonize only with
+the modes of procedure of the less enlightened of our race?&nbsp; Those
+who would object to the hypothesis of a creation by the intervention
+of law, do not perhaps consider how powerful an argument in favour of
+the existence of God is lost by rejecting this doctrine.&nbsp; When
+all is seen to be the result of law, the idea of an Almighty Author
+becomes irresistible, for the creation of a law for an endless series
+of phenomena - an act of intelligence above all else that we can conceive
+- could have no other imaginable source, and tells, moreover, as powerfully
+for a sustaining as for an originating power.&nbsp; On this point a
+remark of Dr. Buckland seems applicable: &ldquo;If the properties adopted
+by the elements at the moment of their creation adapted them beforehand
+to the infinity of complicated useful purposes which they have already
+answered, and may have still farther to answer, under many dispensations
+of the material world, such an aboriginal constitution, so far from
+superseding an intelligent agent, would only exalt our conceptions of
+the consummate skill and power that could comprehend such an infinity
+of future uses under future systems, in the original groundwork of his
+creation.&rdquo;</p>
+<p>A late writer, in a work embracing a vast amount of miscellaneous
+knowledge, but written in a dogmatic style, argues at great length for
+the doctrine of more immediate exertions on the part of the Deity in
+the works of his creation.&nbsp; One of the most striking of his illustrations
+is as follows:- &ldquo;The coral polypi, united by a common animal bond,
+construct a defined form in stone; many kinds construct many forms.&nbsp;
+An allotted instinct may permit each polypus to construct its own cell,
+but there is no superintending one to direct the pattern, nor can the
+workers unite by consultation for such an end.&nbsp; There is no recipient
+for an instinct by which the pattern might be constructed.&nbsp; It
+is God alone, therefore, who is the architect; and for this end, consequently,
+he must dispose of every new polypus required to continue the pattern,
+in a new and peculiar position, which the animal could not have discovered
+by itself.&nbsp; Yet more, millions of these blind workers unite their
+works to form an island, which is also wrought out according to a constant
+general pattern, and of a very peculiar nature, though the separate
+coral works are numerously diverse.&nbsp; Still less, then, here is
+an instinct possible.&nbsp; The Great Architect himself must execute
+what he planned, in each case equally.&nbsp; He uses these little and
+senseless animals as hands; but they are hands which himself must direct.&nbsp;
+He must direct each one everywhere, and therefore he is ever acting.&rdquo;
+<a name="citation159"></a><a href="#footnote159">{159}</a>&nbsp; This
+is a most notable example of a dangerous kind of reasoning.&nbsp; It
+is now believed that corals have a general life and sensation throughout
+the whole mass, residing in the nervous tissue which envelops them;
+consequently, there is nothing more wonderful in their determinate general
+forms than in those of other animals.</p>
+<p>It may here be remarked that there is in our doctrine that harmony
+in all the associated phenomena which generally marks great truths.&nbsp;
+First, it agrees, as we have seen, with the idea of planet-creation
+by natural law.&nbsp; Secondly, upon this supposition, all that geology
+tells us of the succession of species appears natural and intelligible.&nbsp;
+Organic life <i>presses in</i>, as has been remarked, wherever there
+was room and encouragement for it, the forms being always such as suited
+the circumstances, and in a certain relation to them, as, for example,
+where the limestone-forming seas produced an abundance of corals, crinoidea,
+and shell-fish.&nbsp; Admitting for a moment a re-origination of species
+after a cataclysm, as has been surmised by some geologists, though the
+hypothesis is always becoming less and less tenable, it harmonizes with
+nothing so well as the idea of a creation by law.&nbsp; The more solitary
+commencements of species, which would have been the most inconceivably
+paltry exercise for an immediately creative power, are sufficiently
+worthy of one operating by laws.</p>
+<p>It is also to be observed, that the thing to be accounted for is
+not merely the origination of organic being upon this little planet,
+third of a series which is but one of hundreds of thousands of series,
+the whole of which again form but one portion of an apparently infinite
+globe-peopled space, where all seems analogous.&nbsp; We have to suppose,
+that every one of these numberless globes is either a theatre of organic
+being, or in the way of becoming so.&nbsp; This is a conclusion which
+every addition to our knowledge makes only the more irresistible.&nbsp;
+Is it conceivable, as a fitting mode of exercise for creative intelligence,
+that it should be constantly moving from one sphere to another, to form
+and plant the various species which may be required in each situation
+at particular times?&nbsp; Is such an idea accordant with our general
+conception of the dignity, not to speak of the power, of the Great Author?&nbsp;
+Yet such is the notion which we must form, if we adhere to the doctrine
+of special exercise.&nbsp; Let us see, on the other hand, how the doctrine
+of a creation by law agrees with this expanded view of the organic world.</p>
+<p>Unprepared as most men may be for such an announcement, there can
+be no doubt that we are able, in this limited sphere, to form some satisfactory
+conclusions as to the plants and animals of those other spheres which
+move at such immense distances from us.&nbsp; Suppose that the first
+persons of an early nation who made a ship and ventured to sea in it,
+observed, as they sailed along, a set of objects which they had never
+before seen - namely, a fleet of other ships - would they not have been
+justified in supposing that those ships were occupied, like their own,
+by human beings possessing hands to row and steer, eyes to watch the
+signs of the weather, intelligence to guide them from one place to another
+- in short, beings in all respects like themselves, or only shewing
+such differences as they knew to be producible by difference of climate
+and habits of life.&nbsp; Precisely in this manner we can speculate
+on the inhabitants of remote spheres.&nbsp; We see that matter has originally
+been diffused in one mass, of which the spheres are portions.&nbsp;
+Consequently, inorganic matter must be presumed to be everywhere the
+same, although probably with differences in the proportions of ingredients
+in different globes, and also some difference of conditions.&nbsp; Out
+of a certain number of the elements of inorganic matter are composed
+organic bodies, both vegetable and animal; such must be the rule in
+Jupiter and in Sirius, as it is here.&nbsp; We, therefore, are all but
+certain that herbaceous and ligneous fibre, that flesh and blood, are
+the constituents of the organic beings of all those spheres which are
+as yet seats of life.&nbsp; Gravitation we see to be an all-pervading
+principle: therefore there must be a relation between the spheres and
+their respective organic occupants, by virtue of which they are fixed,
+as far as necessary, on the surface.&nbsp; Such a relation, of course,
+involves details as to the density and elasticity of structure, as well
+as size, of the organic tenants, in proportion to the gravity of the
+respective planets - peculiarities, however, which may quite well consist
+with the idea of a universality of general types, to which we are about
+to come.&nbsp; Electricity we also see to be universal; if, therefore,
+it be a principle concerned in life and in mental action, as science
+strongly suggests, life and mental action must everywhere be of one
+general character.&nbsp; We come to comparatively a matter of detail,
+when we advert to heat and light; yet it is important to consider that
+these are universal agents, and that, as they bear marked relations
+to organic life and structure on earth, they may be presumed to do so
+in other spheres also.&nbsp; The considerations as to light are particularly
+interesting, for, on our globe, the structure of one important organ,
+almost universally distributed in the animal kingdom, is in direct and
+precise relation to it.&nbsp; Where there is light there will be eyes,
+and these, in other spheres, will be the same in all respects as the
+eyes of tellurian animals, with only such differences as may be necessary
+to accord with minor peculiarities of condition and of situation.&nbsp;
+It is but a small stretch of the argument to suppose that, one conspicuous
+organ of a large portion of our animal kingdom being thus universal,
+a parity in all the other organs - species for species, class for class,
+kingdom for kingdom - is highly likely, and that thus the inhabitants
+of all the other globes of space bear not only a general, but a particular
+resemblance to those of our own.</p>
+<p>Assuming that organic beings are thus spread over all space, the
+idea of their having all come into existence by the operation of laws
+everywhere applicable, is only conformable to that principle, acknowledged
+to be so generally visible in the affairs of Providence, to have all
+done by the employment of the smallest possible amount of means.&nbsp;
+Thus, as one set of laws produced all orbs and their motions and geognostic
+arrangements, so one set of laws overspread them all with life.&nbsp;
+The whole productive or creative arrangements are therefore in perfect
+unity.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>PARTICULAR CONSIDERATIONS RESPECTING THE ORIGIN OF THE ANIMATED
+TRIBES.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>The general likelihood of an organic creation by law having been
+shewn, we are next to inquire if science has any facts tending to bring
+the assumption more nearly home to nature.&nbsp; Such facts there certainly
+are; but it cannot be surprising that they are comparatively few and
+scattered, when we consider that the inquiry is into one of nature&rsquo;s
+profoundest mysteries, and one which has hitherto engaged no direct
+attention in almost any quarter.</p>
+<p>Crystallization is confessedly a phenomenon of inorganic matter;
+yet the simplest rustic observer is struck by the resemblance which
+the examples of it left upon a window by frost bear to vegetable forms.&nbsp;
+In some crystallizations the mimicry is beautiful and complete; for
+example, in the well-known one called the <i>Arbor Dian&aelig;</i>.&nbsp;
+An amalgam of four parts of silver and two of mercury being dissolved
+in nitric acid, and water equal to thirty weights of the metals being
+added, a small piece of soft amalgam of silver suspended in the solution,
+quickly gathers to itself the particles of the silver of the amalgam,
+which form upon it a <i>crystallization precisely resembling a shrub</i>.&nbsp;
+The experiment may be varied in a way which serves better to detect
+the influence of electricity in such operations, as noted below. <a name="citation166"></a><a href="#footnote166">{166}</a>&nbsp;
+Vegetable figures are also presented in some of the most ordinary appearances
+of the electric fluid.&nbsp; In the marks caused by positive electricity,
+or which it leaves in its passage, we see the ramifications of a tree,
+as well as of its individual leaves; those of the negative, recal the
+bulbous or the spreading root, according as they are clumped or divergent.&nbsp;
+These phenomena seem to say that the electric energies have had something
+to do in determining the forms of plants.&nbsp; That they are intimately
+connected with vegetable life is indubitable, for germination will not
+proceed in water charged with negative electricity, while water charged
+positively greatly favours it; and a garden sensibly increases in luxuriance,
+when a number of conducting rods are made to terminate in branches over
+its beds.&nbsp; With regard to the resemblance of the ramifications
+of the branches and leaves of plants to the traces of the positive electricity,
+and that of the roots to the negative, it is a circumstance calling
+for especial remark, that the atmosphere, particularly its lower strata,
+is generally charged positively, while the earth is always charged negatively.&nbsp;
+The correspondence here is curious.&nbsp; A plant thus appears as a
+thing formed on the basis of a natural electrical operation - the <i>brush</i>
+realized.&nbsp; We can thus suppose the various forms of plants as,
+immediately, the result of a law in electricity variously affecting
+them according to their organic character, or respective germinal constituents.&nbsp;
+In the poplar, the brush is unusually vertical, and little divergent;
+the reverse in the beech: in the palm, a pencil has proceeded straight
+up for a certain distance, radiates there, and turns outwards and downwards;
+and so on.&nbsp; We can here see at least traces of secondary means
+by which the Almighty Deviser might establish all the vegetable forms
+with which the earth is overspread.</p>
+<p>Vegetable and animal bodies are mainly composed of the same four
+simple substances or elements - carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen.&nbsp;
+The first combinations of these in animals are into what are called
+proximate principles, as albumen, fibrin, urea, alantoin, &amp;c., out
+of which the structure of the animal body is composed.&nbsp; Now the
+chemist, by the association of two parts oxygen, four hydrogen, two
+carbon, and two nitrogen, can <i>make urea</i>.&nbsp; Alantoin has also
+been produced artificially.&nbsp; Two of the proximate principles being
+realizable by human care, the possibility of realizing or forming all
+is established.&nbsp; Thus the chemist may be said to have it in his
+power to realize the first step in organization. <a name="citation169a"></a><a href="#footnote169a">{169a}</a>&nbsp;
+Indeed, it is fully acknowledged by Dr. Daubeny, that in the combinations
+forming the proximate principles there is no chemical peculiarity.&nbsp;
+&ldquo;It is now certain,&rdquo; he says, &ldquo;that the same simple
+laws of composition pervade the whole creation; and that, if the organic
+chemist only takes the requisite precautions to avoid resolving into
+their ultimate elements the proximate principles upon which he operates,
+the results of his analysis will shew that they are combined precisely
+according to the same plan as the elements of mineral bodies are known
+to be.&rdquo; <a name="citation169b"></a><a href="#footnote169b">{169b}</a>&nbsp;
+A particular fact is here worthy of attention.&nbsp; &ldquo;The conversion
+of fecula into sugar, as one of the ordinary processes of vegetable
+economy, is effected by the production of a secretion termed <i>diastose</i>,
+which occasions both the rupture of the starch vesicles, and the change
+of their contained gum into sugar.&nbsp; This diastose may be separately
+obtained by the chemist, and it acts as effectually in his laboratory
+as in the vegetable organization.&nbsp; He can also imitate its effects
+by other chemical agents.&rdquo; <a name="citation170"></a><a href="#footnote170">{170}</a>&nbsp;
+The writer quoted below adds, &ldquo;No reasonable ground has yet been
+adduced for supposing that, if we had the power of bringing together
+the elements of any organic compound, in their requisite states and
+proportions, the result would be any other than that which is found
+in the living body.&rdquo;</p>
+<p>It is much to know the elements out of which organic bodies are composed.&nbsp;
+It is something more to know their first combinations, and that these
+are simply chemical.&nbsp; How these combinations are associated in
+the structure of living bodies is the next inquiry, but it is one to
+which as yet no satisfactory answer can be given.&nbsp; The investigation
+of the minuti&aelig; of organic structure by the microscope is of such
+recent origin, that its results cannot be expected to be very clear.&nbsp;
+Some facts, however, are worthy of attention with regard to the present
+inquiry.&nbsp; It is ascertained that the basis of all vegetable and
+animal substances consists of nucleated cells; that is, cells having
+granules within them.&nbsp; Nutriment is converted into these before
+being assimilated by the system.&nbsp; The tissues are formed from them.&nbsp;
+The ovum destined to become a new creature, is originally only a cell
+with a contained granule.&nbsp; We see it acting this reproductive part
+in the simplest manner in the cryptogamic plants.&nbsp; &ldquo;The parent
+cell, arrived at maturity by the exercise of its organic functions,
+bursts, and liberates its contained granules.&nbsp; These, at once thrown
+upon their own resources, and entirely dependent for their nutrition
+on the surrounding elements, develop themselves into new cells, which
+repeat the life of their original.&nbsp; Amongst the higher tribes of
+the cryptogamia, the reproductive cell does not burst, but the first
+cells of the new structure are developed within it, and these gradually
+extend, by a similar process of multiplication, into that primary leaf-like
+expansion which is the first formed structure in all plants.&rdquo;&nbsp;
+<a name="citation171"></a><a href="#footnote171">{171}</a>&nbsp; <i>Here
+the little cell becomes directly a plant</i>, <i>the full formed living
+being</i>.&nbsp; It is also worthy of remark that, in the sponges, (an
+animal form,) a gemmule detached from the body of the parent, and trusting
+for sustentation only to the fluid into which it has been cast, becomes,
+without further process, the new creature.&nbsp; Further, it has been
+recently discovered by means of the microscope, that there is, as far
+as can be judged, a perfect resemblance between the ovum of the mammal
+tribes, during that early stage when it is passing through the oviduct,
+and the young of the infusory animalcules.&nbsp; One of the most remarkable
+of these, the <i>volvox globator</i>, has exactly the form of the germ
+which, after passing through a long f&oelig;tal progress, becomes a
+complete mammifer, an animal of the highest class.&nbsp; It has even
+been found that both are alike provided with those <i>cilia</i>, which,
+producing a revolving motion, or its appearance, is partly the cause
+of the name given to this animalcule.&nbsp; These resemblances are the
+more entitled to notice, that they were made by various observers, distant
+from each other at the time. <a name="citation172"></a><a href="#footnote172">{172}</a>&nbsp;
+It has likewise been noted that the globules of the blood are reproduced
+by the expansion of contained granules; they are, in short, <i>distinct
+organisms multiplied by the same fissiparous generation</i>.&nbsp; So
+that all animated nature may be said to be based on this mode of origin;
+<i>the fundamental form of organic being is a globule</i>, <i>having
+a new globule forming within itself</i>, by which it is in time discharged,
+and which is again followed by another and another, in endless succession.&nbsp;
+It is of course obvious that, if these globules could be produced by
+any process from inorganic elements, we should be entitled to say that
+the fact of a transit from the inorganic into the organic had been witnessed
+in that instance; the possibility of the commencement of animated creation
+by the ordinary laws of nature might be considered as established.&nbsp;
+Now it was given out some years ago by a French physiologist, that <i>globules
+could be produced in albumen by electricity</i>.&nbsp; If, therefore,
+these globules be identical with the cells which are now held to be
+reproductive, it might be said that the production of albumen by artificial
+means is the only step in the process wanting.&nbsp; This has not yet
+been effected; but it is known to be only a chemical process, the mode
+of which may be any day discovered in the laboratory, and two compounds
+perfectly co-ordinate, urea and alantoin, have actually been produced.</p>
+<p>In such an investigation as the present, it is not unworthy of notice
+that the production of shell is a natural operation which can be precisely
+imitated artificially.&nbsp; Such an incrustation takes place on both
+the outside and inside of the wheel in a bleaching establishment, in
+which cotton cloth is rinsed free of the lime employed in its purification.&nbsp;
+From the <i>dressing</i> employed by the weaver, the cloth obtains the
+animal matter, <i>gelatin</i>; this and the lime form the constituents
+of the incrustation, exactly as in natural shell.&nbsp; In the wheel
+employed at Catrine, in Ayrshire, where the phenomenon was first observed
+by the eye of science, it had required ten years to produce a coating
+the tenth of an inch in thickness.&nbsp; This incrustation has all the
+characters of shell, displaying a highly polished surface, beautifully
+iridescent, and, when broken, a foliated texture.&nbsp; The examination
+of it has even thrown some light on the character and mode of formation
+of natural shell.&nbsp; &ldquo;The plates into which the substance is
+divisible have been formed in succession, and certain intervals of time
+have elapsed between their formation; in general, every two contiguous
+lamin&aelig; are separated by a thin iridescent film, varying from the
+three to the fifty millionth part of an inch in thickness, and producing
+all the various colours of thin plates which correspond to intermediate
+thicknesses: between some of the lamin&aelig; no such film exists, probably
+in consequence of the interval of time between their formation being
+too short; and between others the film has been formed of unequal thickness.&nbsp;
+There can be no doubt that these iridescent films are formed when the
+dash-wheel is at rest during the night, and that when no film exists
+between two lamin&aelig;, an interval too short for its formation, (arising,
+perhaps, from the stopping of the work during the day,) has elapsed
+during the drying or induration of one lamina and the deposition of
+another.&rdquo; <a name="citation175"></a><a href="#footnote175">{175}</a>&nbsp;
+From this it has been deduced, by a patient investigation, that those
+colours of mother-of-pearl, which are incommunicable to wax, arise from
+iridescent films deposited between the lamin&aelig; of its structure,
+and it is hence inferred that <i>the animal</i>, like the wheel, <i>rests
+periodically from its labours in forming the natural substance.</i></p>
+<p>These, it will be owned, are curious and not irrelevant facts; but
+it will be asked what actual experience says respecting the origination
+of life.&nbsp; Are there, it will be said, any authentic instances of
+either plants or animals, of however humble and simple a kind, having
+come into existence otherwise than in the ordinary way of generation,
+since the time of which geology forms the record?&nbsp; It may be answered,
+that the negative of this question could not be by any means formidable
+to the doctrine of law-creation, seeing that the conditions necessary
+for the operation of the supposed life-creating laws may not have existed
+within record to any great extent.&nbsp; On the other hand, as we see
+the physical laws of early times still acting with more or less force,
+it might not be unreasonable to expect that we should still see some
+remnants, or partial and occasional workings of the life-creating energy
+amidst a system of things generally stable and at rest.&nbsp; Are there,
+then, any such remnants to be traced in our own day, or during man&rsquo;s
+existence upon earth?&nbsp; If there be, it clearly would form a strong
+evidence in favour of the doctrine, as what now takes place upon a confined
+scale and in a comparatively casual manner may have formerly taken place
+on a great scale, and as the proper and eternity-destined means of supplying
+a vacant globe with suitable tenants.&nbsp; It will at the same time
+be observed that, the earth being now supplied with both kinds of tenants
+in great abundance, we only could expect to find the life-originating
+power at work in some very special and extraordinary circumstances,
+and probably only in the inferior and obscurer departments of the vegetable
+and animal kingdoms.</p>
+<p>Perhaps, if the question were asked of ten men of approved reputation
+in science, nine out of the number would answer in the negative.&nbsp;
+This is because, in a great number of instances where the superficial
+observers of former times assumed a non-generative origin for life,
+(as in the celebrated case in Virgil&rsquo;s fourth Georgic,) either
+the direct contrary has been ascertained, or exhaustive experiments
+have left no alternative from the conclusion that ordinary generation
+did take place, albeit in a manner which escapes observation.&nbsp;
+Finding that an erroneous assumption has been formed in many cases,
+modern inquirers have not hesitated to assume that there can be no case
+in which generation is not concerned; an assumption not only unwarranted
+by, but directly opposed to, the principles of philosophical investigation.&nbsp;
+Yet this is truly the point at which the question now rests in the scientific
+world.</p>
+<p>I have no wish here to enter largely into a subject so wide and so
+full of difficulties; but I may remark, that the explanations usually
+suggested where life takes its rise without apparent generative means,
+always appear to me to partake much of the fallacy of the <i>petitio
+principii</i>.&nbsp; When, for instance, lime is laid down upon a piece
+of waste moss ground, and a crop of white clover for which no seeds
+were sown is the consequence, the explanation that the seeds have been
+dormant there for an unknown time, and were stimulated into germination
+when the lime produced the appropriate circumstances, appears extremely
+unsatisfactory, especially when we know that (as in an authentic case
+under my notice) the spot is many miles from where clover is cultivated,
+and that there is nothing for six feet below but pure peat moss, clover
+seeds being, moreover, known to be too heavy to be transported, as many
+other seeds are, by the winds.&nbsp; Mushrooms, we know, can be propagated
+by their seed; but another mode of raising them, well known to the gardener,
+is to mix cow and horse dung together, and thus form a bed in which
+they are expected to grow without any seed being planted.&nbsp; It is
+assumed that the seeds are carried by the atmosphere, unperceived by
+us, and, finding here an appropriate field for germination, germinate
+accordingly; but this is only assumption, and though designed to be
+on the side of a severe philosophy, in reality makes a pretty large
+demand on credulity.&nbsp; There are several persons eminent in science
+who profess at least to find great difficulties in accepting the doctrine
+of invariable generation.&nbsp; One of these, in the work noted below,
+<a name="citation179a"></a><a href="#footnote179a">{179a}</a> has stated
+several considerations arising from analogical reasoning, which appear
+to him to throw the balance of evidence in favour of the aboriginal
+production of infusoria, <a name="citation179b"></a><a href="#footnote179b">{179b}</a>
+the vegetation called mould, and the like.&nbsp; One seems to be of
+great force; namely, that the animalcules, which are supposed (altogether
+hypothetically) to be produced by ova, are afterwards found increasing
+their numbers, not by that mode at all, but by division of their bodies.&nbsp;
+If it be the nature of these creatures to propagate in this splitting
+or fissiparous manner, how could they be communicated to a vegetable
+infusion?&nbsp; Another fact of very high importance is presented in
+the following terms:- &ldquo;The nature of the animalcule, or vegetable
+production, bears a constant relation to the state of the infusion,
+so that, in similar circumstances, the same are always produced without
+this being influenced by the atmosphere.&nbsp; There seems to be a certain
+<i>progressive advance in the productive powers of the infusion</i>,
+for at the first the animalcules are only of the smaller kinds, or monades,
+and afterwards <i>they become gradually larger and more complicated
+in their structure; after a time</i>, <i>the production ceases</i>,
+<i>although the materials</i> <i>are by no means exhausted</i>.&nbsp;
+When the quantity of water is very small, and the organic matter abundant,
+the production is usually of a vegetable nature; when there is much
+water, animalcules are more frequently produced.&rdquo;&nbsp; It has
+been shewn by the opponents of this theory, that when a vegetable infusion
+is debarred from the contact of the atmosphere, by being closely sealed
+up or covered with a layer of oil, no animalcules are produced; but
+it has been said, on the other hand, that the exclusion of the air may
+prevent some simple condition necessary for the aboriginal development
+of life - and nothing is more likely.&nbsp; Perhaps the prevailing doctrine
+is in nothing placed in greater difficulties than it is with regard
+to the entozoa, or creatures which live within the bodies of others.&nbsp;
+These creatures do, and apparently can, live nowhere else than in the
+interior of other living bodies, where they generally take up their
+abode in the viscera, but also sometimes in the chambers of the eye,
+the interior of the brain, the serous sacs, and other places having
+no communication from without.&nbsp; Some are viviparous, others oviparous.&nbsp;
+Of the latter it cannot reasonably be supposed that the ova ever pass
+through the medium of the air, or through the blood-vessels, for they
+are too heavy for the one transit, and too large for the other.&nbsp;
+Of the former, it cannot be conceived how they pass into young animals
+- certainly not by communication from the parent, for it has often been
+found that entozoa do not appear in certain generations, and some of
+peculiar and noted character have only appeared at rare intervals, and
+in very extraordinary circumstances.&nbsp; A candid view of the less
+popular doctrine, as to the origin of this humble form of life, is taken
+by a distinguished living naturalist.&nbsp; &ldquo;To explain the beginning
+of these worms within the human body, on the common doctrine that all
+created beings proceed from their likes, or a primordial egg, is so
+difficult, that the moderns have been driven to speculate, as our fathers
+did, on their spontaneous birth; but they have received the hypothesis
+with some modification.&nbsp; Thus it is not from putrefaction or fermentation
+that the entozoa are born, for both of these processes are rather fatal
+to their existence, but from the aggregation and fit apposition of matter
+which is already organized, or has been thrown from organized surfaces.&nbsp;
+Their origin in this manner is not more wonderful or more inexplicable
+than that of many of the inferior animals from sections of themselves.
+* * Particles of matter fitted by digestion, and their transmission
+through a living body, for immediate assimilation with it, or flakes
+of lymph detached from surfaces already organized, seem neither to exceed
+nor fall below that simplicity of structure which favours this wonderful
+development; and the supposition that, like morsels of a planaria, they
+may also, when retained in contact with living parts, and in other favourable
+circumstances, continue to live and be gradually changed into creatures
+of analogous conformation, is surely not so absurd as to be brought
+into comparison with the Metamorphoses of Ovid. * * We think the hypothesis
+is also supported in some degree by the fact, that the origin of the
+entozoa is favoured by all causes which tend to disturb the equality
+between the secerning and absorbent systems.&rdquo; <a name="citation182"></a><a href="#footnote182">{182}</a>&nbsp;
+Here particles of organized matter are suggested as the germinal origin
+of distinct and fully organized animals, many of which have a highly
+developed reproductive system.&nbsp; How near such particles must be
+to the inorganic form of matter may be judged from what has been said
+within the last few pages.&nbsp; If, then, this view of the production
+of entozoa be received, it must be held as in no small degree favourable
+to the general doctrine of an organic creation by law.</p>
+<p>There is another series of facts, akin to the above, and which deserve
+not less attention.&nbsp; The pig, in its domestic state, is subject
+to the attacks of a hydatid, from which the wild animal is free; hence
+the disease called measles in pork.&nbsp; The domestication of the pig
+is of course an event subsequent to the origin of man; indeed, comparatively
+speaking, a recent event.&nbsp; Whence, then, the first progenitor of
+this hydatid?&nbsp; So also there is a tinea which attacks dressed wool,
+but never touches it in its unwashed state.&nbsp; A particular insect
+disdains all food but chocolate, and the larva of the <i>oinopota cellaris</i>
+lives nowhere but in wine and beer, all of these being articles manufactured
+by man.&nbsp; There is likewise a creature called the <i>pimelodes cyclopum</i>,
+which is only found in subterranean cavities connected with certain
+specimens of the volcanic formation in South America, dating from a
+time posterior to the arrangements of the earth for our species.&nbsp;
+Whence the first pymelodes cyclopum?&nbsp; Will it, to a geologist,
+appear irrational to suppose that, just as the pterodactyle was added
+in the era of the new red sandstone, when the earth had become suited
+for such a creature, so may these creatures have been added when media
+suitable for their existence arose, and that such phenomena may take
+place any day, the only cause for their taking place seldom being the
+rarity of the rise of new physical conditions on a globe which seems
+to have already undergone the principal part of its destined mutations?</p>
+<p>Between such isolated facts and the greater changes which attended
+various geological eras, it is not easy to see any difference, besides
+simply that of the scale on which the respective phenomena took place,
+as the throwing off of one copy from an engraved plate is exactly the
+same process as that by which a thousand are thrown off.&nbsp; Nothing
+is more easy to conceive than that to Creative Providence, the numbers
+of such phenomena, the time when, and the circumstances under which
+they take place, are indifferent matters.&nbsp; The Eternal One has
+arranged for everything beforehand, and trusted all to the operation
+of the laws of his appointment, himself being ever present in all things.&nbsp;
+We can even conceive that man, in his many doings upon the surface of
+the earth, may occasionally, without his being aware of it, or otherwise,
+act as an instrument in preparing the association of conditions under
+which the creative laws work; and perhaps some instances of his having
+acted as such an instrument have actually occurred in our own time.</p>
+<p>I allude, of course, to the experiments conducted a few years ago
+by Mr. Crosse, which seemed to result in the production of a heretofore
+unknown species of insect in considerable numbers.&nbsp; Various causes
+have prevented these experiments and their results from receiving candid
+treatment, but they may perhaps be yet found to have opened up a new
+and most interesting chapter of nature&rsquo;s mysteries.&nbsp; Mr.
+Crosse was pursuing some experiments in crystallization, causing a powerful
+voltaic battery to operate upon a saturated solution of silicate of
+potash, when the insects unexpectedly made their appearance.&nbsp; He
+afterwards tried nitrate of copper, which is a deadly poison, and from
+that fluid also did live insects emerge.&nbsp; Discouraged by the reception
+of his experiments, Mr. Crosse soon discontinued them; but they were
+some years after pursued by Mr. Weekes, of Sandwich, with precisely
+the same results.&nbsp; This gentleman, besides trying the first of
+the above substances, employed ferro-cyanet of potash, on account of
+its containing a larger proportion of carbon, the principal element
+of organic bodies; and from this substance the insects were produced
+<i>in increased numbers</i>.&nbsp; A few weeks sufficed for this experiment,
+with the powerful battery of Mr. Crosse; but the first attempts of Mr.
+Weekes required about eleven months, a ground of presumption in itself
+that the electricity was chiefly concerned in the phenomenon.&nbsp;
+The changes undergone by the fluid operated upon, were in both cases
+remarkable, and nearly alike.&nbsp; In Mr. Weekes&rsquo; apparatus,
+the silicate of potash became first turbid, then of a milky appearance;
+round the negative wire of the battery, dipped into the fluid, there
+gathered a quantity of <i>gelatinous matter</i>, a part of the process
+of considerable importance, considering that gelatin is one of the <i>proximate
+principles</i>, or first compounds, of which animal bodies are formed.&nbsp;
+From this matter Mr. Weekes observed one of the insects in the very
+act of emerging, immediately after which, it ascended to the surface
+of the fluid, and sought concealment in an obscure corner of the apparatus.&nbsp;
+The insects produced by both experimentalists seem to have been the
+same, a species of acarus, minute and semi-transparent, and furnished
+with long bristles, which can only be seen by the aid of the microscope.&nbsp;
+It is worthy of remark, that some of these insects, soon after their
+existence had commenced, were found to be likely to extend their species.&nbsp;
+They were sometimes observed to go back to the fluid to feed, and occasionally
+they devoured each other. <a name="citation187"></a><a href="#footnote187">{187}</a></p>
+<p>The reception of novelties in science must ever be regulated very
+much by the amount of kindred or relative phenomena which the public
+mind already possesses and acknowledges, to which the new can be assimilated.&nbsp;
+A novelty, however true, if there be no received truths with which it
+can be shewn in harmonious relation, has little chance of a favourable
+hearing.&nbsp; In fact, as has been often observed, there is a measure
+of incredulity from our ignorance as well as from our knowledge, and
+if the most distinguished philosopher three hundred years ago had ventured
+to develop any striking new fact which only could harmonize with the
+as yet unknown Copernican solar system, we cannot doubt that it would
+have been universally scoffed at in the scientific world, such as it
+then was, or at the best interpreted in a thousand wrong ways in conformity
+with ideas already familiar.&nbsp; The experiments above described,
+finding a public mind which had never discovered a fact or conceived
+an idea at all analogous, were of course ungraciously received.&nbsp;
+It was held to be impious, even to surmise that animals could have been
+formed through any instrumentality of an apparatus devised by human
+skill.&nbsp; The more likely account of the phenomena was said to be,
+that the insects were only developed from ova, resting either in the
+fluid, or in the wooden frame on which the experiments took place.&nbsp;
+On these objections the following remarks may be made.&nbsp; The supposition
+of impiety arises from an entire misconception of what is implied by
+an aboriginal creation of insects.&nbsp; The experimentalist could never
+be considered as the author of the existence of these creatures, except
+by the most unreasoning ignorance.&nbsp; The utmost that can be claimed
+for, or imputed to him is that he arranged the natural conditions under
+which the true creative energy - that of the Divine Author of all things
+- was pleased to work in that instance.&nbsp; On the hypothesis here
+brought forward, the <i>acarus Crossii</i> was a type of being ordained
+from the beginning, and destined to be realized under certain physical
+conditions.&nbsp; When a human hand brought these conditions into the
+proper arrangement, it did an act akin to hundreds of familiar ones
+which we execute every day, and which are followed by natural results;
+but it did nothing more.&nbsp; The production of the insect, if it did
+take place as assumed, was as clearly an act of the Almighty himself,
+as if he had fashioned it with hands.&nbsp; For the presumption that
+an act of aboriginal creation did take place, there is this to be said,
+that, in Mr. Weekes&rsquo;s experiment, every care that ingenuity could
+devise was taken to exclude the possibility of a development of the
+insects from ova.&nbsp; The wood of the frame was baked in a powerful
+heat; a bell-shaped glass covered the apparatus, and from this the atmosphere
+was excluded by the constantly rising fumes from the liquid, for the
+emission of which there was an aperture so arranged at the top of the
+glass, that only these fumes could pass.&nbsp; The water was distilled,
+and the substance of the silicate had been subjected to white heat.&nbsp;
+Thus every source of fallacy seemed to be shut up.&nbsp; In such circumstances,
+a candid mind, which sees nothing either impious or unphilosophical
+in the idea of a new creation, will be disposed to think that there
+is less difficulty in believing in such a creation having actually taken
+place, than in believing that, in two instances, separated in place
+and time, exactly the same insects should have chanced to arise from
+concealed ova, and these a species heretofore unknown.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>HYPOTHESIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL KINGDOMS.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>It has been already intimated, as a general fact, that there is an
+obvious gradation amongst the families of both the vegetable and animal
+kingdoms, from the simple lichen and animalcule respectively up to the
+highest order of dicotyledonous trees and the mammalia.&nbsp; Confining
+our attention, in the meantime, to the animal kingdom - it does not
+appear that this gradation passes along one line, on which every form
+of animal life can be, as it were, strung; there may be branching or
+double lines at some places; or the whole may be in a circle composed
+of minor circles, as has been recently suggested.&nbsp; But still it
+is incontestable that there are general appearances of a scale beginning
+with the simple and advancing to the complicated.&nbsp; The animal kingdom
+was divided by Cuvier into four sub-kingdoms, or divisions, and these
+exhibit an unequivocal gradation in the order in which they are here
+enumerated:- Radiata, (polypes, &amp;c.;) mollusca, (pulpy animals;)
+articulata, (jointed animals;) vertebrata, (animals with internal skeleton.)&nbsp;
+The gradation can, in like manner, be clearly traced in the <i>classes</i>
+into which the sub-kingdoms are subdivided, as, for instance, when we
+take those of the vertebrata in this order - reptiles, fishes, birds,
+mammals.</p>
+<p>While the external forms of all these various animals are so different,
+it is very remarkable that the whole are, after all, variations of a
+fundamental plan, which can be traced as a basis throughout the whole,
+the variations being merely modifications of that plan to suit the particular
+conditions in which each particular animal has been designed to live.&nbsp;
+Starting from the primeval germ, which, as we have seen, is the representative
+of a particular order of full-grown animals, we find all others to be
+merely advances from that type, with the extension of endowments and
+modification of forms which are required in each particular case; each
+form, also, retaining a strong affinity to that which precedes it, and
+tending to impress its own features on that which succeeds.&nbsp; This
+unity of structure, as it is called, becomes the more remarkable, when
+we observe that the organs, while preserving a resemblance, are often
+put to different uses.&nbsp; For example: the ribs become, in the serpent,
+organs of locomotion, and the snout is extended, in the elephant, into
+a prehensile instrument.</p>
+<p>It is equally remarkable that analogous purposes are served in different
+animals by organs essentially different.&nbsp; Thus, the mammalia breathe
+by lungs; the fishes, by gills.&nbsp; These are not modifications of
+one organ, but distinct organs.&nbsp; In mammifers, the gills exist
+and act at an early stage of the f&oelig;tal state, but afterwards go
+back and appear no more; while the lungs are developed.&nbsp; In fishes,
+again, the gills only are fully developed; while the lung structure
+either makes no advance at all, or only appears in the rudimentary form
+of an air-bladder.&nbsp; So, also, the baleen of the whale and the teeth
+of the land mammalia are different organs.&nbsp; The whale, in embryo,
+shews the rudiments of teeth; but these, not being wanted, are not developed,
+and the baleen is brought forward instead.&nbsp; The land animals, we
+may also be sure, have the rudiments of baleen in their organization.&nbsp;
+In many instances, a particular structure is found advanced to a certain
+point in a particular set of animals, (for instance, feet in the serpent
+tribe,) although it is not there required in any degree; but the peculiarity,
+being carried a little farther forward, is perhaps useful in the next
+set of animals in the scale.&nbsp; Such are called rudimentary organs.&nbsp;
+With this class of phenomena are to be ranked the useless mamm&aelig;
+of the male human being, and the unrequired process of bone in the male
+opossum, which is needed in the female for supporting her pouch.&nbsp;
+Such curious features are most conspicuous in animals which form links
+between various classes.</p>
+<p>As formerly stated, the marsupials, standing at the bottom of the
+mammalia, shew their affinity to the oviparous vertebrata, by the rudiments
+of two canals passing from near the anus to the external surfaces of
+the viscera, which are fully developed in fishes, being required by
+them for the respiration of aerated waters, but which are not needed
+by the atmosphere-breathing marsupials.&nbsp; We have also the peculiar
+form of the sternum and rib-bones of the lizards <i>represented</i>
+in the mammalia in certain white cartilaginous lines traceable among
+their abdominal muscles.&nbsp; The struphionid&aelig; (birds of the
+ostrich type) form a link between birds and mammalia, and in them we
+find the wings imperfectly or not at all developed, a diaphragm and
+urinary sac, (organs wanting in other birds,) and feathers approaching
+the nature of hair.&nbsp; Again, the ornithorynchus belongs to a class
+at the bottom of the mammalia, and approximating to birds, and in it
+behold the bill and web-feet of that order!</p>
+<p>For further illustration, it is obvious that, various as may be the
+lengths of the upper part of the vertebral column in the mammalia, it
+always consists of the same parts.&nbsp; The giraffe has in its tall
+neck the same number of bones with the pig, which scarcely appears to
+have a neck at all. <a name="citation195"></a><a href="#footnote195">{195}</a>&nbsp;
+Man, again, has no tail; but the notion of a much-ridiculed philosopher
+of the last century is not altogether, as it happens, without foundation,
+for the bones of a caudal extremity exist in an undeveloped state in
+the <i>os coccygis</i> of the human subject.&nbsp; The limbs of all
+the vertebrate animals are, in like manner, on one plan, however various
+they may appear.&nbsp; In the hind-leg of a horse, for example, the
+angle called the hock is the same part which in us forms the heel; and
+the horse, and all other quadrupeds, with almost the solitary exception
+of the bear, walk, in reality, upon what answers to the toes of a human
+being.&nbsp; In this and many other quadrupeds the fore part of the
+extremities is shrunk up in a hoof, as the tail of the human being is
+shrunk up in the bony mass at the bottom of the back.&nbsp; The bat,
+on the other hand, has these parts largely developed.&nbsp; The membrane,
+commonly called its wing, is framed chiefly upon bones answering precisely
+to those of the human hand; its extinct congener, the pterodactyle,
+had the same membrane extended upon the fore-finger only, which in that
+animal was prolonged to an extraordinary extent.&nbsp; In the paddles
+of the whale and other animals of its order, we see the same bones as
+in the more highly developed extremities of the land mammifers; and
+even the serpent tribes, which present no external appearance of such
+extremities, possess them in reality, but in an undeveloped or rudimental
+state.</p>
+<p>The same law of development presides over the vegetable kingdom.&nbsp;
+Amongst phanerogamous plants, a certain number of organs appear to be
+always present, either in a developed or rudimentary state; and those
+which are rudimentary can be developed by cultivation.&nbsp; The flowers
+which bear stamens on one stalk and pistils on another, can be caused
+to produce both, or to become perfect flowers, by having a sufficiency
+of nourishment supplied to them.&nbsp; So also, where a special function
+is required for particular circumstances, nature has provided for it,
+not by a new organ, but by a modification of a common one, which she
+has effected in development.&nbsp; Thus, for instance, some plants destined
+to live in arid situations, require to have a store of water which they
+may slowly absorb.&nbsp; The need is arranged for by a cup-like expansion
+round the stalk, in which water remains after a shower.&nbsp; Now the
+<i>pitcher</i>, as this is called, is not a new organ, but simply a
+metamorphose of a leaf.</p>
+<p>These facts clearly shew how all the various organic forms of our
+world are bound up in one - how a fundamental unity pervades and embraces
+them all, collecting them, from the humblest lichen up to the highest
+mammifer, in one system, the whole creation of which must have depended
+upon one law or decree of the Almighty, though it did not all come forth
+at one time.&nbsp; After what we have seen, the idea of a separate exertion
+for each must appear totally inadmissible.&nbsp; The single fact of
+abortive or rudimentary organs condemns it; for these, on such a supposition,
+could be regarded in no other light than as blemishes or blunders -
+the thing of all others most irreconcilable with that idea of Almighty
+Perfection which a general view of nature so irresistibly conveys.&nbsp;
+On the other hand, when the organic creation is admitted to have been
+effected by a general law, we see nothing in these abortive parts but
+harmless peculiarities of development, and interesting evidences of
+the manner in which the Divine Author has been pleased to work.</p>
+<p>We have yet to advert to the most interesting class of facts connected
+with the laws of organic development.&nbsp; It is only in recent times
+that physiologists have observed that each animal passes, in the course
+of its germinal history, through a series of changes resembling the
+<i>permanent forms</i> of the various orders of animals inferior to
+it in the scale.&nbsp; Thus, for instance, an insect, standing at the
+head of the articulated animals, is, in the larva state, a true annelid,
+or worm, the annelida being the lowest in the same class.&nbsp; The
+embryo of a crab resembles the perfect animal of the inferior order
+myriapoda, and passes through all the forms of transition which characterize
+the intermediate tribes of crustacea.&nbsp; The frog, for some time
+after its birth, is a fish with external gills, and other organs fitting
+it for an aquatic life, all of which are changed as it advances to maturity,
+and becomes a land animal.&nbsp; The mammifer only passes through still
+more stages, according to its higher place in the scale.&nbsp; Nor is
+man himself exempt from this law.&nbsp; His first form is that which
+is permanent in the animalcule.&nbsp; His organization gradually passes
+through conditions generally resembling a fish, a reptile, a bird, and
+the lower mammalia, before it attains its specific maturity.&nbsp; At
+one of the last stages of his f&oelig;tal career, he exhibits an intermaxillary
+bone, which is characteristic of the perfect ape; this is suppressed,
+and he may then be said to take leave of the simial type, and become
+a true human creature.&nbsp; Even, as we shall see, the varieties of
+his race are represented in the progressive development of an individual
+of the highest, before we see the adult Caucasian, the highest point
+yet attained in the animal scale.</p>
+<p>To come to particular points of the organization.&nbsp; The brain
+of man, which exceeds that of all other animals in complexity of organization
+and fulness of development, is, at one early period, only &ldquo;a simple
+fold of nervous matter, with difficulty distinguishable into three parts,
+while a little tail-like prolongation towards the hinder parts, and
+which had been the first to appear, is the only representation of a
+spinal marrow.&nbsp; Now, in this state it perfectly resembles the brain
+of an adult fish, thus assuming <i>in transitu</i> the form that in
+the fish is permanent.&nbsp; In a short time, however, the structure
+is become more complex, the parts more distinct, the spinal marrow better
+marked; it is now the brain of a reptile.&nbsp; The change continues;
+by a singular motion, certain parts (<i>corpora quadragemina</i>) which
+had hitherto appeared on the upper surface, now pass towards the lower;
+the former is their permanent situation in fishes and reptiles, the
+latter in birds and mammalia.&nbsp; This is another advance in the scale,
+but more remains yet to be done.&nbsp; The complication of the organ
+increases; cavities termed <i>ventricles</i> are formed, which do not
+exist in fishes, reptiles, or birds; curiously organized parts, such
+as the corpora striata, are added; it is now the brain of the mammalia.&nbsp;
+Its last and final change alone seems wanting, that which shall render
+it the brain of MAN.&rdquo; <a name="citation201"></a><a href="#footnote201">{201}</a>&nbsp;
+And this change in time takes place.</p>
+<p>So also with the heart.&nbsp; This organ, in the mammalia, consists
+of four cavities, but in the reptiles of only three, and in fishes of
+two only, while in the articulated animals it is merely a prolonged
+tube.&nbsp; Now in the mammal f&oelig;tus, at a certain early stage,
+the organ has the form of a prolonged tube; and a human being may be
+said to have then the heart of an insect.&nbsp; Subsequently it is shortened
+and widened, and becomes divided by a contraction into two parts, a
+ventricle and an auricle; it is now the heart of a fish.&nbsp; A subdivision
+of the auricle afterwards makes a triple-chambered form, as in the heart
+of the reptile tribes; lastly, the ventricle being also subdivided,
+it becomes a full mammal heart.</p>
+<p>Another illustration here presents itself with the force of the most
+powerful and interesting analogy.&nbsp; Some of the earliest fishes
+of our globe, those of the Old Red Sandstone, present, as we have seen,
+certain peculiarities, as the one-sided tail and an inferior position
+of the mouth.&nbsp; No fishes of the present day, in a mature state,
+are so characterized; but some, at a certain stage of their existence,
+have such peculiarities.&nbsp; It occurred to a geologist to inquire
+if the fish which existed before the Old Red Sandstone had any peculiarities
+assimilating them to the f&oelig;tal condition of existing fish, and
+particularly if they were small.&nbsp; The first which occur before
+the time of the Old Red Sandstone, are those described by Mr. Murchison,
+as belonging to the Upper Ludlow Rocks; <i>they are all rather small</i>.&nbsp;
+Still older are those detected by Mr. Philips, in the Aymestry Limestone,
+being the most ancient of the class which have as yet been discovered;
+<i>these are so extremely minute as only to be distinguishable by the
+microscope</i>.&nbsp; Here we apparently have very clear demonstrations
+of a parity, or rather identity, of laws presiding over the development
+of the animated tribes on the face of the earth, and that of the individual
+in embryo.</p>
+<p>The tendency of all these illustrations is to make us look to <i>development</i>
+as the principle which has been immediately concerned in the peopling
+of this globe, a process extending over a vast space of time, but which
+is nevertheless connected in character with the briefer process by which
+an individual being is evoked from a simple germ.&nbsp; What mystery
+is there here - and how shall I proceed to enunciate the conception
+which I have ventured to form of what may prove to be its proper solution!&nbsp;
+It is an idea by no means calculated to impress by its greatness, or
+to puzzle by its profoundness.&nbsp; It is an idea more marked by simplicity
+than perhaps any other of those which have explained the great secrets
+of nature.&nbsp; But in this lies, perhaps, one of its strongest claims
+to the faith of mankind.</p>
+<p>The whole train of animated beings, from the simplest and oldest
+up to the highest and most recent, are, then, to be regarded as a series
+of <i>advances of the principle of development</i>, which have depended
+upon external physical circumstances, to which the resulting animals
+are appropriate.&nbsp; I contemplate the whole phenomena as having been
+in the first place arranged in the counsels of Divine Wisdom, to take
+place, not only upon this sphere, but upon all the others in space,
+under necessary modifications, and as being carried on, from first to
+last, here and elsewhere, under immediate favour of the creative will
+or energy. <a name="citation204"></a><a href="#footnote204">{204}</a>&nbsp;
+The nucleated vesicle, the fundamental form of all organization, we
+must regard as the meeting-point between the inorganic and the organic
+- the end of the mineral and beginning of the vegetable and animal kingdoms,
+which thence start in different directions, but in perfect parallelism
+and analogy.&nbsp; We have already seen that this nucleated vesicle
+is itself a type of mature and independent being in the infusory animalcules,
+as well as the starting point of the f&oelig;tal progress of every higher
+individual in creation, both animal and vegetable.&nbsp; We have seen
+that it is a form of being which electric agency will produce - though
+not perhaps usher into full life - in albumen, one of those compound
+elements of animal bodies, of which another (urea) has been made by
+artificial means.&nbsp; Remembering these things, we are drawn on to
+the supposition, that the first step in the creation of life upon this
+planet was <i>a chemico-electric operation</i>, <i>by which simple germinal
+vesicles were produced</i>.&nbsp; This is so much, but what were the
+next steps?&nbsp; Let a common vegetable infusion help us to an answer.&nbsp;
+There, as we have seen, simple forms are produced at first, but afterwards
+they become more complicated, until at length the life-producing powers
+of the infusion are exhausted.&nbsp; Are we to presume that, in this
+case, the simple engender the complicated?&nbsp; Undoubtedly, this would
+not be more wonderful as a natural process than one which we never think
+of wondering at, because familiar to us - namely, that in the gestation
+of the mammals, the animalcule-like ovum of a few days is the parent,
+in a sense, of the chick-like form of a few weeks, and that in all the
+subsequent stages - fish, reptile, &amp;c. - the one may, with scarcely
+a metaphor, be said to be the progenitor of the other.&nbsp; I suggest,
+then, as an hypothesis already countenanced by much that is ascertained,
+and likely to be further sanctioned by much that remains to be known,
+that the first step was <i>an advance under favour of peculiar conditions</i>,
+<i>from the simplest forms of being</i>, <i>to the next more complicated</i>,
+<i>and this through the medium of the ordinary process of generation.</i></p>
+<p>Unquestionably, what we ordinarily see of nature is calculated to
+impress a conviction that each species invariably produces its like.&nbsp;
+But I would here call attention to a remarkable illustration of natural
+law which has been brought forward by Mr. Babbage, in his <i>Ninth Bridgewater
+Treatise</i>.&nbsp; The reader is requested to suppose himself seated
+before the calculating machine, and observing it.&nbsp; It is moved
+by a weight, and there is a wheel which revolves through a small angle
+round its axis, at short intervals, presenting to his eye successively,
+a series of numbers engraved on its divided circumference.</p>
+<p>Let the figures thus seen be the series, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, &amp;c.,
+of natural numbers, each of which exceeds its immediate antecedent by
+unity.</p>
+<p>&ldquo;Now, reader,&rdquo; says Mr. Babbage, &ldquo;let me ask you
+how long you will have counted before you are firmly convinced that
+the engine has been so adjusted, that it will continue, while its motion
+is maintained, to produce the same series of natural numbers?&nbsp;
+Some minds are so constituted, that, after passing the first hundred
+terms, they will be satisfied that they are acquainted with the law.&nbsp;
+After seeing five hundred terms few will doubt, and after the fifty
+thousandth term the propensity to believe that the succeeding term will
+be fifty thousand and one, will be almost irresistible.&nbsp; That term
+<i>will</i> be fifty thousand and one; and the same regular succession
+will continue; the five millionth and the fifty millionth term will
+still appear in their expected order, and one unbroken chain of natural
+numbers will pass before your eyes, from <i>one</i> up to <i>one hundred
+million.</i></p>
+<p>&ldquo;True to the vast induction which has been made, the next succeeding
+term will be one hundred million and one; but the next number presented
+by the rim of the wheel, instead of being one hundred million and two,
+is one hundred million <i>ten thousand</i> and two.&nbsp; The whole
+series from the commencement being thus, -</p>
+<p>1<br />2<br />3<br />4<br />5<br />.<br />. .<br />. . .<br />99,999,999<br />100,000,000<br />regularly
+as far as 100,000,001<br />100,010,002 the law changes.<br />100,030,003<br />100,060,004<br />100,100,005<br />100,150,006<br />100,210,007<br />100,280,008<br />.
+. .<br />. . .<br />. . .</p>
+<p>&ldquo;The law which seemed at first to govern this series failed
+at the hundred million and second term.&nbsp; This term is larger than
+we expected by 10,000.&nbsp; The next term is larger than was anticipated
+by 30,000, and the excess of each term above what we had expected forms
+the following table:-</p>
+<p>10,000<br />30,000<br />60,000<br />100,000<br />150,000<br />. .
+.<br />. . .</p>
+<p>being, in fact, the series of <i>triangular numbers</i>, <a name="citation208"></a><a href="#footnote208">{208}</a>
+each multiplied by 10,000.</p>
+<p>&ldquo;If we now continue to observe the numbers presented by the
+wheel, we shall find, that for a hundred, or even for a thousand terms,
+they continue to follow the new law relating to the triangular numbers;
+but after watching them for 2761 terms, we find that this law fails
+in the case of the 2762d term.</p>
+<p>&ldquo;If we continue to observe, we shall discover another law then
+coming into action, which also is dependent, but in a different manner,
+on triangular numbers.&nbsp; This will continue through about 1430 terms,
+when a new law is again introduced which extends over about 950 terms,
+and this, too, like all its predecessors, fails, and gives place to
+other laws, which appear at different intervals.</p>
+<p>&ldquo;Now it must be observed that <i>the law that each number presented
+by the engine is greater by unity than the preceding number</i>, which
+law the observer had deduced from an induction of a hundred million
+instances, <i>was not the true law that regulated its action</i>, and
+that the occurrence of the number 100,010,002 at the 100,000,002nd term
+was <i>as necessary a consequence of the original adjustment</i>, <i>and
+might have been as fully foreknown at the commencement</i>, <i>as was
+the regular succession of any one of the intermediate numbers to its
+immediate antecedent</i>.&nbsp; The same remark applies to the next
+apparent deviation from the new law, which was founded on an induction
+of 2761 terms, and also to the succeeding law, with this limitation
+only - that, whilst their consecutive introduction at various definite
+intervals, is a necessary consequence of the mechanical structure of
+the engine, our knowledge of analysis does not enable us to predict
+the periods themselves at which the more distant laws will be introduced.&rdquo;</p>
+<p>It is not difficult to apply the philosophy of this passage to the
+question under consideration.&nbsp; It must be borne in mind that the
+gestation of a single organism is the work of but a few days, weeks,
+or months; but the gestation (so to speak) of a whole creation is a
+matter probably involving enormous spaces of time.&nbsp; Suppose that
+an ephemeron, hovering over a pool for its one April day of life, were
+capable of observing the fry of the frog in the water below.&nbsp; In
+its aged afternoon, having seen no change upon them for such a long
+time, it would be little qualified to conceive that the external branchi&aelig;
+of these creatures were to decay, and be replaced by internal lungs,
+that feet were to be developed, the tail erased, and the animal then
+to become a denizen of the land.&nbsp; Precisely such may be our difficulty
+in conceiving that any of the species which people our earth is capable
+of advancing by generation to a higher type of being.&nbsp; During the
+whole time which we call the historical era, the limits of species have
+been, to ordinary observation, rigidly adhered to.&nbsp; But the historical
+era is, we know, only a small portion of the entire age of our globe.&nbsp;
+We do not know what may have happened during the ages which preceded
+its commencement, as we do not know what may happen in ages yet in the
+distant future.&nbsp; All, therefore, that we can properly infer from
+the apparently invariable production of like by like is, that such is
+the ordinary procedure of nature in the time immediately passing before
+our eyes.&nbsp; Mr. Babbage&rsquo;s illustration powerfully suggests
+that this ordinary procedure may be subordinate to a higher law which
+only <i>permits</i> it for a time, and in proper season interrupts and
+changes it.&nbsp; We shall soon see some philosophical evidence for
+this very conclusion.</p>
+<p>It has been seen that, in the reproduction of the higher animals,
+the new being passes through stages in which it is successively fish-like
+and reptile-like.&nbsp; But the resemblance is not to the adult fish
+or the adult reptile, but to the fish and reptile at a certain point
+in their f&oelig;tal progress; this holds true with regard to the vascular,
+nervous, and other systems alike.&nbsp; It may be illustrated by a simple
+diagram.&nbsp; The f&oelig;tus of all the four classes may be supposed
+to advance in an identical condition to the point A.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<pre>&nbsp;&nbsp;M
+&nbsp;&nbsp;|
+&nbsp;&nbsp;| B<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;|/<br />D + R<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;|/
+C + F<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;|/<br />A +<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;|<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;|</pre>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>The fish there diverges and passes along a line apart, and peculiar
+to A itself, to its mature state at F.&nbsp; The reptile, bird, and
+mammal, go on together to C, where the reptile diverges in like manner,
+and advances by itself to R.&nbsp; The bird diverges at D, and goes
+on to B.&nbsp; The mammal then goes forward in a straight line to the
+highest point of organization at M.&nbsp; This diagram shews only the
+main ramifications; but the reader must suppose minor ones, representing
+the subordinate differences of orders, tribes, families, genera, &amp;c.,
+if he wishes to extend his views to the whole varieties of being in
+the animal kingdom.&nbsp; Limiting ourselves at present to the outline
+afforded by this diagram, it is apparent that the only thing required
+for an advance from one type to another in the generative process is
+that, for example, the fish embryo should not diverge at A, but go on
+to C before it diverges, in which case the progeny will be, not a fish,
+but a reptile.&nbsp; To protract the <i>straightforward part of the
+gestation over a small space</i> - and from species to species the space
+would be small indeed - is all that is necessary.</p>
+<p>This might be done by the force of certain external conditions operating
+upon the parturient system.&nbsp; The nature of these conditions we
+can only conjecture, for their operation, which in the geological eras
+was so powerful, has in its main strength been long interrupted, and
+is now perhaps only allowed to work in some of the lowest departments
+of the organic world, or under extraordinary casualties in some of the
+higher, and to these points the attention of science has as yet been
+little directed.&nbsp; But though this knowledge were never to be clearly
+attained, it need not much affect the present argument, provided it
+be satisfactorily shewn that there must be some such influence within
+the range of natural things.</p>
+<p>To this conclusion it must be greatly conducive that the law of organic
+development is still daily seen at work to certain effects, only somewhat
+short of a transition from species to species.&nbsp; Sex we have seen
+to be a matter of development.&nbsp; There is an instance, in a humble
+department of the animal world, of arrangements being made by the animals
+themselves for adjusting this law to the production of a particular
+sex.&nbsp; Amongst bees, as amongst several other insect tribes, there
+is in each community but one true female, the queen bee, the workers
+being false females or neuters; that is to say, sex is carried on in
+them to a point where it is attended by sterility.&nbsp; The preparatory
+states of the queen bee occupy sixteen days; those of the neuters, twenty;
+and those of males, twenty-four.&nbsp; Now it is a fact, settled by
+innumerable observations and experiments, that the bees can so modify
+a worker in the larva state, that, when it emerges from the pupa, it
+is found to be a queen or true female.&nbsp; For this purpose they enlarge
+its cell, make a pyramidal hollow to allow of its assuming a vertical
+instead of a horizontal position, keep it warmer than other larv&aelig;
+are kept, and feed it with a peculiar kind of food.&nbsp; From these
+simple circumstances, leading to a shortening of the embryotic condition,
+results a creature different in form, and also in dispositions, from
+what would have otherwise been produced.&nbsp; Some of the organs possessed
+by the worker are here altogether wanting.&nbsp; We have a creature
+&ldquo;destined to enjoy love, to burn with jealousy and anger, to be
+incited to vengeance, and to pass her time without labour,&rdquo; instead
+of one &ldquo;zealous for the good of the community, a defender of the
+public rights, enjoying an immunity from the stimulus of sexual appetite
+and the pains of parturition; laborious, industrious, patient, ingenious,
+skilful; incessantly engaged in the nurture of the young, in collecting
+honey and pollen, in elaborating wax, in constructing cells and the
+like! - paying the most respectful and assiduous attention to objects
+which, had its ovaries been developed, it would have hated and pursued
+with the most vindictive fury till it had destroyed them!&rdquo; <a name="citation215"></a><a href="#footnote215">{215}</a>&nbsp;
+All these changes may be produced by a mere modification of the embryotic
+progress, which it is within the power of the adult animals to effect.&nbsp;
+But it is important to observe that this modification is different from
+working a direct change upon the embryo.&nbsp; It is not the different
+food which effects a metamorphosis.&nbsp; All that is done is merely
+to accelerate the period of the insect&rsquo;s perfection.&nbsp; By
+the arrangements made and the food given, the embryo becomes sooner
+fit for being ushered forth in its imago or perfect state.&nbsp; Development
+may be said to be thus arrested at a particular stage - that early one
+at which the female sex is complete.&nbsp; In the other circumstances,
+it is allowed to go on four days longer, and a stage is then reached
+between the two sexes, which in this species is designed to be the perfect
+condition of a large portion of the community.&nbsp; Four days more
+make it a perfect male.&nbsp; It is at the same time to be observed
+that there is, from the period of oviposition, a destined distinction
+between the sexes of the young bees.&nbsp; The queen lays the whole
+of the eggs which are designed to become workers, before she begins
+to lay those which become males.&nbsp; But probably the condition of
+her reproductive system governs the matter of sex, for it is remarked
+that when her impregnation is delayed beyond the twenty-eighth day of
+her entire existence, she lays only eggs which become males.</p>
+<p>We have here, it will be admitted, a most remarkable illustration
+of the principle of development, although in an operation limited to
+the production of sex only.&nbsp; Let it not be said that the phenomena
+concerned in the generation of bees may be very different from those
+concerned in the reproduction of the higher animals.&nbsp; There is
+a unity throughout nature which makes the one case an instructive reflection
+of the other.</p>
+<p>We shall now see an instance of development operating within the
+production of what approaches to the character of variety of species.&nbsp;
+It is fully established that a human family, tribe, or nation, is liable,
+in the course of generations, to be either advanced from a mean form
+to a higher one, or degraded from a higher to a lower, by the influence
+of the physical conditions in which it lives.&nbsp; The coarse features,
+and other structural peculiarities of the negro race only continue while
+these people live amidst the circumstances usually associated with barbarism.&nbsp;
+In a more temperate clime, and higher social state, the face and figure
+become greatly refined.&nbsp; The few African nations which possess
+any civilization also exhibit forms approaching the European; and when
+the same people in the United States of America have enjoyed a within-door
+life for several generations, they assimilate to the whites amongst
+whom they live.&nbsp; On the other hand, there are authentic instances
+of a people originally well-formed and good-looking, being brought,
+by imperfect diet and a variety of physical hardships, to a meaner form.&nbsp;
+It is remarkable that prominence of the jaws, a recession and diminution
+of the cranium, and an elongation and attenuation of the limbs, are
+peculiarities always produced by these miserable conditions, for they
+indicate an unequivocal retrogression towards the type of the lower
+animals.&nbsp; Thus we see nature alike willing to go back and to go
+forward.&nbsp; Both effects are simply the result of the operation of
+the law of development in the generative system.&nbsp; Give good conditions,
+it advances; bad ones, it recedes.&nbsp; Now, perhaps, it is only because
+there is no longer a possibility, in the higher types of being, of giving
+sufficiently favourable conditions to carry on species to species, that
+we see the operation of the law so far limited.</p>
+<p>Let us trace this law also in the production of certain classes of
+monstrosities.&nbsp; A human f&oelig;tus is often left with one of the
+most important parts of its frame imperfectly developed: the heart,
+for instance, goes no farther than the three-chambered form, so that
+it is the heart of a reptile.&nbsp; There are even instances of this
+organ being left in the two-chambered or fish form.&nbsp; Such defects
+are the result of nothing more than a failure of the power of development
+in the system of the mother, occasioned by weak health or misery.&nbsp;
+Here we have apparently a realization of the converse of those conditions
+which carry on species to species, so far, at least, as one organ is
+concerned.&nbsp; Seeing a complete specific retrogression in this one
+point, how easy it is to imagine an access of favourable conditions
+sufficient to reverse the phenomenon, and make a fish mother develop
+a reptile heart, or a reptile mother develop a mammal one.&nbsp; It
+is no great boldness to surmise that a super-adequacy in the measure
+of this under-adequacy (and the one thing seems as natural an occurrence
+as the other) would suffice in a goose to give its progeny the body
+of a rat, and produce the ornithorynchus, or might give the progeny
+of an ornithorynchus the mouth and feet of a true rodent, and thus complete
+at two stages the passage from the aves to the mammalia.</p>
+<p>Perhaps even the transition from species to species does still take
+place in some of the obscurer fields of creation, or under extraordinary
+casualties, though science professes to have no such facts on record.&nbsp;
+It is here to be remarked, that such facts might often happen, and yet
+no record be taken of them, for so strong is the prepossession for the
+doctrine of invariable like-production, that such circumstances, on
+occurring, would be almost sure to be explained away on some other supposition,
+or, if presented, would be disbelieved and neglected.&nbsp; Science,
+therefore, has no such facts, for the very same reason that some small
+sects are said to have no discreditable members - namely, that they
+do not receive such persons, and extrude all who begin to verge upon
+the character.&nbsp; There are, nevertheless, some facts which have
+chanced to be reported without any reference to this hypothesis, and
+which it seems extremely difficult to explain satisfactorily upon any
+other.&nbsp; One of these has already been mentioned - a progression
+in the forms of the animalcules in a vegetable infusion from the simpler
+to the more complicated, a sort of microcosm, representing the whole
+history of the progress of animal creation as displayed by geology.&nbsp;
+Another is given in the history of the Acarus Crossii, which may be
+only the ultimate stage of a series of similar transformations effected
+by electric agency in the solution subjected to it.&nbsp; There is,
+however, one direct case of a translation of species, which has been
+presented with a respectable amount of authority. <a name="citation221"></a><a href="#footnote221">{221}</a>&nbsp;
+It appears that, whenever oats sown at the usual time are kept cropped
+down during summer and autumn, and allowed to remain over the winter,
+a thin crop of rye is the harvest presented at the close of the ensuing
+summer.&nbsp; This experiment has been tried repeatedly, with but one
+result; invariably the <i>secale cereale</i> is the crop reaped where
+the <i>avena sativa</i>, a recognised different species, was sown.&nbsp;
+Now it will not satisfy a strict inquirer to be told that the seeds
+of the rye were latent in the ground and only superseded the dead product
+of the oats; for if any such fact were in the case, why should the usurping
+grain be always rye?&nbsp; Perhaps those curious facts which have been
+stated with regard to forests of one kind of trees, when burnt down,
+being succeeded (without planting) by other kinds, may yet be found
+most explicable, as this is, upon the hypothesis of a progression of
+species which takes place under certain favouring conditions, now apparently
+of comparatively rare occurrence.&nbsp; The case of the oats is the
+more valuable, as bearing upon the suggestion as to a protraction of
+the gestation at a particular part of its course.&nbsp; Here, the generative
+process is, by the simple mode of cropping down, kept up for a whole
+year beyond its usual term.&nbsp; The type is thus allowed to advance,
+and what was oats becomes rye.</p>
+<p>The idea, then, which I form of the progress of organic life upon
+the globe - and the hypothesis is applicable to all similar theatres
+of vital being - is, <i>that the simplest and most primitive type</i>,
+<i>under a law to which that of like-production is subordinate</i>,
+<i>gave birth to the type next above it</i>, <i>that this again produced
+the next higher</i>, <i>and so on to the very highest</i>, the stages
+of advance being in all cases very small - namely, from one species
+only to another; so that the phenomenon has always been of a simple
+and modest character.&nbsp; Whether the whole of any species was at
+once translated forward, or only a few parents were employed to give
+birth to the new type, must remain undetermined; but, supposing that
+the former was the case, we must presume that the moves along the line
+or lines were simultaneous, so that the place vacated by one species
+was immediately taken by the next in succession, and so on back to the
+first, for the supply of which the formation of a new germinal vesicle
+out of inorganic matter was alone necessary.&nbsp; Thus, the production
+of new forms, as shewn in the pages of the geological record, has never
+been anything more than a new stage of progress in gestation, an event
+as simply natural, and attended as little by any circumstances of a
+wonderful or startling kind, as the silent advance of an ordinary mother
+from one week to another of her pregnancy.&nbsp; Yet, be it remembered,
+the whole phenomena are, in another point of view, wonders of the highest
+kind, for in each of them we have to trace the effect of an Almighty
+Will which had arranged the whole in such harmony with external physical
+circumstances, that both were developed in parallel steps - and probably
+this development upon our planet is but a sample of what has taken place,
+through the same cause, in all the other countless theatres of being
+which are suspended in space.</p>
+<p>This may be the proper place at which to introduce the preceding
+illustrations in a form calculated to bring them more forcibly before
+the mind of the reader.&nbsp; The following table was suggested to me,
+in consequence of seeing the scale of animated nature presented in Dr.
+Fletcher&rsquo;s Rudiments of Physiology.&nbsp; Taking that scale as
+its basis, it shews the wonderful parity observed in the progress of
+creation, as presented to our observation in the succession of fossils,
+and also in the f&oelig;tal progress of one of the principal human organs.
+<a name="citation224"></a><a href="#footnote224">{224}</a>&nbsp; This
+scale, it may be remarked, was not made up with a view to support such
+an hypothesis as the present, nor with any apparent regard to the history
+of fossils, but merely to express the appearance of advancement in the
+orders of the Cuvierian system, assuming, as the criterion of that advancement,
+&ldquo;an increase in the number and extent of the manifestations of
+life, or of the relations which an organized being bears to the external
+world.&rdquo;&nbsp; Excepting in the relative situation of the annelida
+and a few of the mammal orders, the parity is perfect; nor may even
+these small discrepancies appear when the order of fossils shall have
+been further investigated, or a more correct scale shall have been formed.&nbsp;
+Meanwhile, it is a wonderful evidence in favour of our hypothesis, that
+a scale formed so arbitrarily should coincide to such a nearness with
+our present knowledge of the succession of animal forms upon earth,
+and also that both of these series should harmonize so well with the
+view given by modern physiologists of the embryotic progress of one
+of the organs of the highest order of animals.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>TABLE <a name="citation226"></a><a href="#footnote226">{226}</a></p>
+<p>Table shows: scale of animal kingdom (the numbers indicate orders);
+order of animals in; ascending series of rocks; f&oelig;tal human brain
+resembles, in</p>
+<p>(The numbers indicate orders)</p>
+<p>Rocks: 1. Gneiss and Mica Slate system<br />F&oelig;tal: 1st month,
+that of an avertebrated animal;</p>
+<p>Scale: RADIATA (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)<br />Order: Zoophyta, Polypiaria<br />Rocks:
+2. Clay Slate and Grawacke system<br />F&oelig;tal: 1st month, that
+of an avertebrated animal;</p>
+<p>Scale: MOLLUSCA (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)<br />Order: Conchifera, Double-shelled
+Mollusks<br />Rocks: 3. Silurian system<br />F&oelig;tal: 1st month,
+that of an avertebrated animal;</p>
+<p>Scale: ARTICULATA <i>Annelida</i> (12, 13, 14)<br />Rocks: 3. Silurian
+system<br />F&oelig;tal: 1st month, that of an avertebrated animal;</p>
+<p>Scale: ARTICULATA <i>Crustacea</i> (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20)<br />Order:
+Crustacea, Annelida, Crustaceous Fishes<br />Rocks: 3. Silurian system<br />F&oelig;tal:
+1st month, that of an avertebrated animal;</p>
+<p>Scale: ARTICULATA <i>Arachnida &amp; Insecta</i> (21-31)<br />Order:
+Crustaceous Fishes<br />Rocks: 4. Old Red Sandstone<br />F&oelig;tal:
+1st month, that of an avertebrated animal;</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Pisces</i> (32, 33, 34, 35, 36)<br />Order:
+True Fishes<br />Rocks: 5. Carboniferous formation<br />F&oelig;tal:
+2nd month, that of a fish;</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Reptilia</i> (37, 38, 39, 40)<br />Order: Piscine
+Saurians (ichthyosaurus, &amp;c.), Pterodactyles, Crocodiles, Tortoises,
+Batrachians<br />Rocks: 6. New Red Sandstone<br />F&oelig;tal: 3rd month,
+that of a turtle;</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Aves</i> (41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46)<br />Order:
+Birds<br />Rocks: 6. New Red Sandstone<br />F&oelig;tal: 4th month,
+that of a bird;</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 47 Cetacea<br />Order: (Bone of
+a marsupial animal)<br />Rocks: 7. Oolite</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 48 Ruminantia<br />Order: (Bone
+of a marsupial animal)<br />Rocks: 8. Cretaceous formation</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 49 Pachydermata<br />Order: Pachydermata
+(tapirs, horses, &amp;c.)<br />Rocks: 9. Lower Eocene</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 50 Edentata<br />Order: Pachydermata
+(tapirs, horses, &amp;c.)<br />Rocks: 9. Lower Eocene</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 51 Rodentia<br />Order: Rodentia
+(dormouse, squirrel, &amp;c.)<br />Rocks: 9. Lower Eocene<br />F&oelig;tal:
+5th month, that of a rodent;</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 52 Marsupialia<br />Order: Marsupialia
+(racoon, opossum, &amp;c.)<br />Rocks: 9. Lower Eocene<br />F&oelig;tal:
+6th month, that of a ruminant;</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 53 Amphibia<br />Order: Marsupialia
+(racoon, opossum, &amp;c.)<br />Rocks: 9. Lower Eocene<br />F&oelig;tal:
+6th month, that of a ruminant;</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 54 Digitigrada<br />Order: Digitigrada
+(genette, fox, wolf, &amp;c.)<br />Rocks: 10. Miocene<br />F&oelig;tal:
+7th month, that of a digitigrade animal;</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 55 Plantigrada<br />Order: Plantigrada
+(bear)<br />Rocks: 10. Miocene</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 55 Plantigrada<br />Order: Cetacea
+(lamantins, seals, whales)<br />Rocks: 10. Miocene</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 56 Insectivora<br />Order: Edentata
+(sloths, &amp;c.)<br />Rocks: 11. Pliocene</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 56 Insectivora<br />Order: Ruminantia
+(oxen, deer, &amp;c.)<br />Rocks: 11. Pliocene</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 57 Cheiroptera<br />Rocks: 11.
+Pliocene</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 58 Quadrumana<br />Order: Quadrumana
+(monkeys)<br />Rocks: 11. Pliocene<br />F&oelig;tal: 8th month, that
+of the quadrumana;</p>
+<p>Scale: VERTEBRATA <i>Mammalia</i>: 59 Bimana<br />Order: Bimana (man)<br />Rocks:
+12. Superficial deposits<br />F&oelig;tal: 9th month, attains full human
+character;</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>The reader has seen physical conditions several times referred to,
+as to be presumed to have in some way governed the progress of the development
+of the zoological circle.&nbsp; This language may seem vague, and, it
+may be asked, - can any particular physical condition be adduced as
+likely to have affected development?&nbsp; To this it may be answered,
+that air and light are probably amongst the principal agencies of this
+kind which operated in educing the various forms of being.&nbsp; Light
+is found to be essential to the development of the individual embryo.&nbsp;
+When tadpoles were placed in a perforated box, and that box sunk in
+the Seine, light being the only condition thus abstracted, they grew
+to a great size in their original form, but did not pass through the
+usual metamorphose which brings them to their mature state as frogs.&nbsp;
+The proteus, an animal of the frog kind, inhabiting the subterraneous
+waters of Carniola, and which never acquires perfect lungs so as to
+become a land animal, is presumed to be an example of arrested development,
+from the same cause.&nbsp; When, in connexion with these facts, we learn
+that human mothers living in dark and close cells under ground, - that
+is to say, with an inadequate provision of air and light, - are found
+to produce an unusual proportion of defective children, <a name="citation229"></a><a href="#footnote229">{229}</a>
+we can appreciate the important effects of both these physical conditions
+in ordinary reproduction.&nbsp; Now there is nothing to forbid the supposition
+that the earth has been at different stages of its career under different
+conditions, as to both air and light.&nbsp; On the contrary, we have
+seen reason for supposing that the proportion of carbonic acid gas (the
+element fatal to animal life) was larger at the time of the carboniferous
+formation than it afterwards became.&nbsp; We have also seen that astronomers
+regard the zodiacal light as a residuum of matter enveloping the sun,
+and which was probably at one time denser than it is now.&nbsp; Here
+we have the indications of causes for a progress in the purification
+of the atmosphere and in the diffusion of light during the earlier ages
+of the earth&rsquo;s history, with which the progress of organic life
+may have been conformable.&nbsp; An accession to the proportion of oxygen,
+and the effulgence of the central luminary, may have been the immediate
+prompting cause of all those advances from species to species which
+we have seen, upon other grounds, to be necessarily supposed as having
+taken place.&nbsp; And causes of the like nature may well be supposed
+to operate on other spheres of being, as well as on this.&nbsp; I do
+not indeed present these ideas as furnishing the true explanation of
+the progress of organic creation; they are merely thrown out as hints
+towards the formation of a just hypothesis, the completion of which
+is only to be looked for when some considerable advances shall have
+been made in the amount and character of our stock of knowledge.</p>
+<p>Early in this century, M. Lamarck, a naturalist of the highest character,
+suggested an hypothesis of organic progress which deservedly incurred
+much ridicule, although it contained a glimmer of the truth.&nbsp; He
+surmised, and endeavoured, with a great deal of ingenuity, to prove,
+that one being advanced in the course of generations to another, in
+consequence merely of its experience of wants calling for the exercise
+of its faculties in a particular direction, by which exercise new developments
+of organs took place, ending in variations sufficient to constitute
+a new species.&nbsp; Thus he thought that a bird would be driven by
+necessity to seek its food in the water, and that, in its efforts to
+swim, the outstretching of its claws would lead to the expansion of
+the intermediate membranes, and it would thus become web-footed.&nbsp;
+Now it is possible that wants and the exercise of faculties have entered
+in some manner into the production of the phenomena which we have been
+considering; but certainly not in the way suggested by Lamarck, whose
+whole notion is obviously so inadequate to account for the rise of the
+organic kingdoms, that we only can place it with pity among the follies
+of the wise.&nbsp; Had the laws of organic development been known in
+his time, his theory might have been of a more imposing kind.&nbsp;
+It is upon these that the present hypothesis is mainly founded.&nbsp;
+I take existing natural means, and shew them to have been capable of
+producing all the existing organisms, with the simple and easily conceivable
+aid of a higher generative law, which we perhaps still see operating
+upon a limited scale.&nbsp; I also go beyond the French philosopher
+to a very important point, the original Divine conception of all the
+forms of being which these natural laws were only instruments in working
+out and realizing.&nbsp; The actuality of such a conception I hold to
+be strikingly demonstrated by the discoveries of Macleay, Vigors, and
+Swainson, with respect to the affinities and analogies of animal (and
+by implication vegetable) organisms. <a name="citation232"></a><a href="#footnote232">{232}</a>&nbsp;
+Such a regularity in the <i>structure</i>, as we may call it, of the
+<i>classification of animals</i>, as is shewn in their systems, is totally
+irreconcilable with the idea of form going on to form merely as needs
+and wishes in the animals themselves dictated.&nbsp; Had such been the
+case, all would have been irregular, as things arbitrary necessarily
+are.&nbsp; But, lo, the whole plan of being is as symmetrical as the
+plan of a house, or the laying out of an old-fashioned garden!&nbsp;
+This must needs have been devised and arranged for beforehand.&nbsp;
+And what a preconception or forethought have we here!&nbsp; Let us only
+for a moment consider how various are the external physical conditions
+in which animals live - climate, soil, temperature, land, water, air
+- the peculiarities of food, and the various ways in which it is to
+be sought; the peculiar circumstances in which the business of reproduction
+and the care-taking of the young are to be attended to - all these required
+to be taken into account, and thousands of animals were to be formed
+suitable in organization and mental character for the concerns they
+were to have with these various conditions and circumstances - here
+a tooth fitted for crushing nuts; there a claw fitted to serve as a
+hook for suspension; here to repress teeth and develop a bony net-work
+instead; there to arrange for a bronchial apparatus, to last only for
+a certain brief time; and all these animals were to be schemed out,
+each as a part of a great range, which was on the whole to be rigidly
+regular: let us, I say, only consider these things, and we shall see
+that the decreeing of laws to bring the whole about was an act involving
+such a degree of wisdom and device as we only can attribute, adoringly,
+to the one Eternal and Unchangeable.&nbsp; It may be asked, how does
+this reflection comport with that timid philosophy which would have
+us to draw back from the investigation of God&rsquo;s works, lest the
+knowledge of them should make us undervalue his greatness and forget
+his paternal character?&nbsp; Does it not rather appear that our ideas
+of the Deity can only be worthy of him in the ratio in which we advance
+in a knowledge of his works and ways; and that the acquisition of this
+knowledge is consequently an available means of our growing in a genuine
+reverence for him!</p>
+<p>But the idea that any of the lower animals have been concerned in
+any way with the origin of man - is not this degrading?&nbsp; Degrading
+is a term, expressive of a notion of the human mind, and the human mind
+is liable to prejudices which prevent its notions from being invariably
+correct.&nbsp; Were we acquainted for the first time with the circumstances
+attending the production of an individual of our race, we might equally
+think them degrading, and be eager to deny them, and exclude them from
+the admitted truths of nature.&nbsp; Knowing this fact familiarly and
+beyond contradiction, a healthy and natural mind finds no difficulty
+in regarding it complacently.&nbsp; Creative Providence has been pleased
+to order that it should be so, and it must therefore be submitted to.&nbsp;
+Now the idea as to the progress of organic creation, if we become satisfied
+of its truth, ought to be received precisely in this spirit.&nbsp; It
+has pleased Providence to arrange that one species should give birth
+to another, until the second highest gave birth to man, who is the very
+highest: be it so, it is our part to admire and to submit.&nbsp; The
+very faintest notion of there being anything ridiculous or degrading
+in the theory - how absurd does it appear, when we remember that every
+individual amongst us actually passes through the characters of the
+insect, the fish, and reptile, (to speak nothing of others,) before
+he is permitted to breathe the breath of life!&nbsp; But such notions
+are mere emanations of false pride and ignorant prejudice.&nbsp; He
+who conceives them little reflects that they, in reality, involve the
+principle of a contempt for the works and ways of God.&nbsp; For it
+may be asked, if He, as appears, has chosen to employ inferior organisms
+as a generative medium for the production of higher ones, even including
+ourselves, what right have we, his humble creatures, to find fault?&nbsp;
+There is, also, in this prejudice, an element of unkindliness towards
+the lower animals, which is utterly out of place.&nbsp; These creatures
+are all of them part products of the Almighty Conception, as well as
+ourselves.&nbsp; All of them display wondrous evidences of his wisdom
+and benevolence.&nbsp; All of them have had assigned to them by their
+Great Father a part in the drama of the organic world, as well as ourselves.&nbsp;
+Why should they be held in such contempt?&nbsp; Let us regard them in
+a proper spirit, as parts of the grand plan, instead of contemplating
+them in the light of frivolous prejudices, and we shall be altogether
+at a loss to see how there should be any degradation in the idea of
+our race having been genealogically connected with them.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>MACLEAY SYSTEM OF ANIMATED NATURE.&nbsp; THIS SYSTEM CONSIDERED
+IN CONNEXION WITH THE PROGRESS OF ORGANIC CREATION, AND AS INDICATING
+THE NATURAL STATUS OF MAN.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>It is now high time to advert to the system formed by the animated
+tribes, both with a view to the possible illustration of the preceding
+argument, and for the light which it throws upon that general system
+of nature which it is the more comprehensive object of this book to
+ascertain.</p>
+<p>The vegetable and animal kingdoms are arranged upon a scale, starting
+from simply organized forms, and going on to the more complex, each
+of these forms being but slightly different from those next to it on
+both sides.&nbsp; The lowest and most slightly developed forms in the
+two kingdoms are so closely connected, that it is impossible to say
+where vegetable ends and animal begins.&nbsp; United at what may be
+called their bases, they start away in different directions, but not
+altogether to lose sight of each other.&nbsp; On the contrary, they
+maintain a strict analogy throughout the whole of their subsequent courses,
+sub-kingdom for sub-kingdom, class for class; shewing a beautiful, though
+as yet obscure relation between the two grand forms of being, and consequently
+a unity in the laws which brought them both into existence.&nbsp; So
+complete does this analogy appear, even in the present imperfect state
+of science, that I fully expect in a few years to see the animal and
+vegetable kingdoms duly ranked up against each other in a system of
+parallels, which will admit of our assigning to each species in the
+former the particular shrub or tree corresponding to it in the latter,
+all marked by unmistakable analogies of the most interesting kind.</p>
+<p>It is as yet but a few years since a system of subordinate analogies
+not less remarkable began to be speculated upon as within the range
+of the animal kingdom.&nbsp; Probably it also exists in the vegetable
+kingdom; but to this point no direct attention has been given; so we
+are left to infer that such is the case from theoretical considerations
+only.&nbsp; We are indebted for what we know of these beautiful analogies
+to three naturalists - Macleay, Vigors, and Swainson, whose labours
+tempt us to dismiss in a great measure the artificial classifications
+hitherto used, and make an entirely new conspectus of the animal kingdom,
+not to speak of the corresponding reform which will be required in our
+systems of botany also.</p>
+<p>The Macleay system, as it may be called in honour of its principal
+author, announces that, whether we take the whole animal kingdom, or
+any definite division of it, we shall find that we are examining a group
+of beings which is capable of being arranged along a series of close
+affinities, <i>in a circular form</i>, - that is to say, starting from
+any one portion of the group, when it is properly arranged, we can proceed
+from one to another by minute gradations, till at length, having run
+through the whole, we return to the point whence we set out.&nbsp; All
+natural groups of animals are, therefore, in the language of Mr. Macleay,
+<i>circular</i>; and the possibility of throwing any supposed group
+into a circular arrangement is held as a decisive test of its being
+a real or natural one.&nbsp; It is of course to be understood that each
+circle is composed of a set of inferior circles: for example, a set
+of <i>tribe</i> circles composes an <i>order</i>; a set of <i>order</i>
+circles, again, forms a <i>class</i>; and so on.&nbsp; Of each group,
+the component circles are <i>invariably five in number</i>: thus, in
+the animal kingdom, there are five sub-kingdoms, - the vertebrata, annulosa,
+<a name="citation239a"></a><a href="#footnote239a">{239a}</a> radiata,
+acrita, <a name="citation239b"></a><a href="#footnote239b">{239b}</a>
+mollusca.&nbsp; Take, again, one of these sub-kingdoms, the vertebrata,
+and we find it composed of five classes, - the mammalia, reptilia, pisces,
+amphibia, and aves, each of the other sub-kingdoms being similarly divisible.&nbsp;
+Take the mammalia, and it is in like manner found to be composed of
+five orders, - the cheirotheria, <a name="citation239c"></a><a href="#footnote239c">{239c}</a>
+fer&aelig;, cetacea, glires, ungulata.&nbsp; Even in this numerical
+uniformity, which goes down to the lowest ramifications of the system,
+there would be something very remarkable, as arguing a definite and
+preconceived arrangement; but this is only the least curious part of
+the Macleay theory.</p>
+<p>We shall best understand the wonderfully complex system of analogies
+developed by that theory, if we start from the part of the kingdom in
+which they were first traced, - namely, the class aves, or birds.&nbsp;
+This gives for its five orders, - <i>incessores</i>, (perching birds,)
+<i>raptores</i>, (birds of prey,) <i>natatores</i>, (swimming birds,)
+<i>grallatores</i>, (waders,) <i>rasores</i>, (scrapers.)&nbsp; In these
+orders our naturalists discerned distinct organic characters, of different
+degrees of perfectness, the first being the most perfect with regard
+to the general character of the class, and therefore the best representative
+of that class; whence it was called the <i>typical</i> order.&nbsp;
+The second was found to be inferior, or rather to have a less perfect
+balance of qualities; hence it was designated the <i>sub-typical</i>.&nbsp;
+In this are comprehended the chief noxious and destructive animals of
+the circle to which it belongs.&nbsp; The other three groups were called
+aberrant, as exhibiting a much wider departure from the typical standard,
+although the last of the three is observed to make a certain recovery,
+and join on to the typical group, so as to complete the circle.&nbsp;
+The first of the aberrant groups (natatores) is remarkable for making
+the water the theatre of its existence, and the birds composing it are
+in general of comparatively large bulk.&nbsp; The second (grallatores)
+are long-limbed and long-billed, that they may wade and pick up their
+subsistence in the shallows and marshes in which they chiefly live.&nbsp;
+The third (rasores) are distinguished by strong feet, for walking or
+running on the ground, and for scraping in it for their food; also by
+wings designed to scarcely raise them off the earth and, farther, by
+a general domesticity of character and usefulness to man.</p>
+<p>Now the most remarkable circumstance is, that these organic characters,
+habits, and moral properties, were found to be traceable more or less
+distinctly in the corresponding portions of every other group, even
+of those belonging to distant subdivisions of the animal kingdom, as,
+for instance, the insects.&nbsp; The incessores (typical order of aves)
+being reduced to its constituent circles or tribes, it was found that
+these strictly represented the five orders.&nbsp; In the <i>conirostres</i>
+are the perfections which belong to the incessores as an order, with
+the conspicuous external feature of a comparatively small notch in their
+bills; in the <i>dentirostres</i>, the notch is strong and toothlike,
+(hence the name of the tribe) assimilating them to the raptores; the
+<i>fissirostres</i> come into analogy with the natatores in the slight
+development of their feet and their great powers of flight; the <i>tenuirostres</i>
+have the small mouths and long soft bills of the grallatores.&nbsp;
+Finally, the <i>scansores</i> resemble the rasores in their superior
+intelligence and docility, and in their having strong limbs and a bill
+entire at the tip.&nbsp; This parity of qualities becomes clearer when
+placed in a tabular form:-</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<pre><i>Orders of Birds.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Characters.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Tribes of Incessores.</i></pre>
+<pre>Incessores&nbsp; - Most perfect of their circle;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Conirostres.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;notch of bill small<br />Raptores&nbsp; &nbsp; - Notch of bill like a tooth&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Dentirostres.<br />Natatores&nbsp; - Slightly developed feet;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Fissirostres.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;strong flight<br />Grallatores - Small mouths; long soft bills&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Tenuirostres.<br />Rasores&nbsp; &nbsp; - Strong feet, short wings;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Scansores.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;docile and domestic</pre>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>Some comprehensive terms are much wanted to describe these five characters,
+so curiously repeated throughout the whole of the animal, and probably
+also the vegetable kingdom.&nbsp; Meanwhile, Mr. Swainson calls them
+typical, sub-typical, natatorial, suctorial, <a name="citation242"></a><a href="#footnote242">{242}</a>
+and rasorial.&nbsp; Some of his illustrations of the principle are exceedingly
+interesting.&nbsp; He shews that the leading animal of a typical circle
+usually has a combination of properties concentrated in itself, without
+any of these preponderating remarkably over others.&nbsp; The sub-typical
+circles, he says, &ldquo;do not comprise the largest individuals in
+bulk, but always those which are the most powerfully armed, either for
+inflicting injury on their own class, for exciting terror, producing
+injury, or creating annoyance to man.&nbsp; Their dispositions are often
+sanguinary, since the forms most conspicuous among them live by rapine,
+and subsist on the blood of other animals.&nbsp; They are, in short,
+symbolically types of <i>evil</i>.&rdquo;&nbsp; This symbolical character
+is most conspicuous about the centre of the series of gradations:-</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>Kingdom . . . Annulosa.<br />Sub-kingdom . . . Reptilia.<br />Class
+(Mammalia) . . .&nbsp; Fer&aelig;.<br />(Aves) . . . Raptores.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>In the annulosa it is not distinct, although we must also remember
+that insects do produce enormous ravages and annoyance in many parts
+of the earth.&nbsp; In the reptilia it is more distinct, since to this
+class belong the ophidia, (serpents,) an order peculiarly noxious.&nbsp;
+It comes to a kind of climax in the fer&aelig; and raptores, which fulfil
+the function of butchers among land animals.&nbsp; As we descend through
+tribes, families, genera, species, it becomes fainter and fainter, but
+never altogether vanishes.&nbsp; In the dentirostres, for instance,
+we have in a subdued form the hooked bill and predaceous character of
+the raptores; to this tribe belongs the family of the shrikes, so deadly
+to all the lesser field birds.&nbsp; In the genus bos, we have, in the
+sub-typical group, the bison, &ldquo;wild, revengeful, and shewing an
+innate detestation of man.&rdquo;&nbsp; In equus, we have, in the same
+situation, the zebra, which actually shews the stripes of the tiger,
+and is as remarkable for its wildness as its congeners, the horse and
+ass, are for their docility and usefulness.&nbsp; To quote again from
+Mr. Swainson, &ldquo;the singular threatening aspect which the caterpillars
+of the sphinx moth assume on being disturbed, is a remarkable modification
+of the terrific or evil nature which is impressed in one form or another,
+palpable or remote, upon all sub-typical groups; for this division of
+the lepidopterous order is precisely of this denomination.&nbsp; In
+the pre-eminent type of this order of insects, the butterflies, (papilionides,)
+our associations little prepare us for expecting any trace of the evil
+principle; but here, too, there is a sub-typical division.&nbsp; These,&rdquo;
+says our naturalist, &ldquo;are distinguished by their caterpillars
+being armed with formidable spines or prickles, which in general are
+possessed of some highly acrimonious or poisonous quality, capable of
+injuring those who touch them.&nbsp; It is only,&rdquo; continues Mr.
+Swainson, &ldquo;when extensive researches bring to light a uniformity
+of results, that we can venture to believe they are so universal as
+to deserve being ranked as primary laws.&nbsp; Thus, when a celebrated
+entomologist denounced as impure the black and lurid beetles forming
+the saprophagous petalocera of Mr. Macleay, a tribe living only upon
+putrid vegetable matter, and hiding themselves in their disgusting food,
+or in dark hollows of the earth, neither of these celebrated men suspected
+the absolute fact, elicited from our analogies of this group, that this
+very tribe constituted the sub-typical group of one of the primary divisions
+of coleopterous insects: nor had they any suspicion that, by the filthy
+habits and repulsive forms of these beetles, nature had intended that
+they should be types or emblems of hundreds of other groups, distinguished
+by peculiarities equally indicative of evil.&nbsp; On the other hand,
+the thalerophagous petalocera, forming the typical group of the same
+division, present us with all the perfections and habits belonging to
+their kind.&nbsp; These families of beetles live only upon fresh vegetables;
+they are diurnal, and sport in the glare of day, pure in their food,
+elegant in their shapes, and beautiful in their colours.&rdquo; <a name="citation246"></a><a href="#footnote246">{246}</a></p>
+<p>The third type, (first of the three aberrant,) called by Mr. Swainson,
+the <i>natatorial</i>, or aquatic, are chiefly remarkable for their
+bulk, the disproportionate size of the head, and the absence, or slight
+development of the feet.&nbsp; They partake of the predaceous and destructive
+character of the adjoining sub-typical group, and the means of their
+predacity are generally found in the mouth alone.&nbsp; In the primary
+division of the animal kingdom, we find the type in the radiata, not
+one of which lives out of water.&nbsp; In the vertebrata, it is in the
+fishes.&nbsp; In both of these, feet are totally wanting.&nbsp; Descending
+to the class mammalia, we have this type in the cetacea, which present
+a comparatively slight development of limbs.&nbsp; In the aves, as we
+have seen, the type is presented in the natatores, whose name has been
+adopted as an appropriate term for all the corresponding groups.&nbsp;
+An enumeration of some other examples of the natatorial type, as the
+cephalopoda (instanced in the cuttle-fish) in the mollusca; the crustacea
+(crabs, &amp;c.) in the annulosa; the owls (which often duck for fish)
+in the raptores; the ichthyosaurus, plesiosaurus, &amp;c., among reptilia,
+will serve to bring the general character, and its pervasion of the
+whole animal world, forcibly before the mind of the reader.</p>
+<p>The next type is that of meanest and most imperfect organization,
+the lower termination of all groups, as the typical is the upper.&nbsp;
+It is called by Mr. Swainson the suctorial, from a very generally prevalent
+peculiarity, that of drawing sustenance by suction.&nbsp; The acrita,
+or polypes, among the sub-kingdoms; the intestina, among the annulosa;
+the tortoises, among the reptilia; the armadillo and scaly ant-eater,
+pig, mouse, jerboa, and kangaroo, among quadrupeds; the waders and tenuirostres,
+among birds; the coleoptera, (bug, louse, flea, &amp;c.) among insects;
+the gastrobranchus, among fishes; are examples which will illustrate
+the special characters of this type.&nbsp; These are smallness, particularly
+in the head and mouth, feebleness, and want of offensive protection,
+defect of organs of mastication, considerable powers of swift movement,
+and (often) a parasitic mode of living; while of negative qualities,
+there are, besides, indisposition to domestication, and an unsuitableness
+to serve as human food.</p>
+<p>The rasorial type comprehends most of the animals which become domesticated
+and useful to man, as, first, the fowls which give a name to the type,
+the ungulata, and more particularly the ruminantia, among quadrupeds,
+and the dog among the fer&aelig;.&nbsp; Gentleness, familiarity with
+man, and a peculiar approach to human intelligence, are the leading
+mental characteristics of animals of this type.&nbsp; Amongst external
+characters, we generally find power of limbs and feet for locomotion
+on land, (to which the rasorial type is confined,) abundant tail and
+ornaments for the head, whether in the form of tufts, crests, horns,
+or bony excrescences.&nbsp; In the animal kingdom, the mollusca are
+the rasorial type, which, however, only shews itself there in their
+soft and sluggish character, and their being very generally edible.&nbsp;
+In the ptilota, or winged insects, the hymenopterous are the rasorial
+type, and it is not therefore surprising to find amongst them the ants
+and bees, &ldquo;the most social, intelligent, and in the latter case,
+most useful to man, of all the annulose animals.&rdquo;</p>
+<p>As yet the speculations on representation are imperfect, in consequence
+of the novelty of the doctrine, and the defective state of our knowledge
+of animated nature.&nbsp; It has, however, been so fully proved in the
+aves, and traced so clearly in other parts of the animal kingdom, and
+as a general feature of that part of nature, that hardly a doubt can
+exist of its being universally applicable.&nbsp; Even in the lowly forms
+of the acrita, (polypes,) the suctorial type of the animal kingdom,
+representation has been discerned, and with some remarkable results
+as to the history of our world.&nbsp; The acrita were the first forms
+of animal life upon earth, the starting point of that great branch of
+organization.&nbsp; Now, this sub-kingdom consists, like the rest, of
+five groups, (classes,) and these are respectively representations of
+the acrita itself, and the other four sub-kingdoms, which had not come
+into existence when the acrita were formed.&nbsp; The polypi vaginati,
+in the crustaceous covering of the living mass, and their more or less
+articulated structure, represent the <i>annulosa</i>.&nbsp; In the radiated
+forms of the rotifera, and the simple structure of the polypi rudes,
+we are reminded of the <i>radiata</i>.&nbsp; The <i>mollusca</i> are
+typified in the soft, mucous, sluggish intestina.&nbsp; And, finally,
+in the fleshy living mass which surrounds the bony and hollow axis of
+the polypi natantes, we have a sketch of the <i>vertebrata</i>.&nbsp;
+The acrita thus appear as a prophecy of the higher events of animal
+development.&nbsp; They shew that the nobler orders of being, including
+man himself, were contemplated from the first, and came into existence
+by virtue of a law, the operation of which had commenced ages before
+their forms were realized.</p>
+<p>The system of representation is therefore to be regarded as <i>a
+powerful additional proof of the hypothesis of organic progress by virtue
+of law</i>.&nbsp; It establishes the unity of animated nature and the
+definite character of its entire constitution.&nbsp; It enables us to
+see how, under the flowing robes of nature, where all looks arbitrary
+and accidental, there is an artificiality of the most rigid kind.&nbsp;
+The natural, we now perceive, sinks into and merges in a Higher Artificial.&nbsp;
+To adopt a comparison more apt than dignified, we may be said to be
+placed here as insects are in a garden of the old style.&nbsp; Our first
+unassisted view is limited, and we perceive only the irregularities
+of the minute surface, and single shrubs which appear arbitrarily scattered.&nbsp;
+But our view at length extending and becoming more comprehensive, we
+begin to see parterres balancing each other, trees, statues, and arbours
+placed symmetrically, and that the whole is an assemblage of parts mutually
+reflective.&nbsp; It can scarcely be necessary to point to the inference
+hence arising with regard to the origination of nature in some Power,
+of which man&rsquo;s mind is a faint and humble representation.&nbsp;
+The insects of the garden, supposing them to be invested with reasoning
+power, and aware how artificial are their own works, might of course
+very reasonably conclude that, being in its totality an artificial object,
+the garden was the work of some maker or artificer.&nbsp; And so also
+must we conclude, when we attain a knowledge of the artificiality which
+is at the basis of nature, that nature is wholly the production of a
+Being resembling, but infinitely greater than ourselves.</p>
+<p>Organic beings are, then, bound together in development, and in a
+system of both affinities and analogies.&nbsp; Now, it will be asked,
+does this agree with what we know of the geographical distribution of
+organic beings, and of the history of organic progress as delineated
+by geology?&nbsp; Let us first advert to the geographical question.</p>
+<p>Plants, as is well known, require various kinds of soil, forms of
+geographical surface, climate, and other conditions, for their existence.&nbsp;
+And it is everywhere found that, however isolated a particular spot
+may be with regard to these conditions, - as a mountain top in a torrid
+country, the marsh round a salt spring far inland, or an island placed
+far apart in the ocean, - appropriate plants have there taken up their
+abode.&nbsp; But the torrid zone divides the two temperate regions from
+each other by the space of more than forty-six degrees, and the torrid
+and temperate zones together form a much broader line of division between
+the two arctic regions.&nbsp; The Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, and the
+Persian Gulf, also divide the various portions of continent in the torrid
+and temperate zones from each other.&nbsp; Australia is also divided
+by a broad sea from the continent of Asia.&nbsp; Thus there are various
+portions of the earth separated from each other in such a way as to
+preclude anything like a general communication of the seeds of their
+respective plants towards each other.&nbsp; Hence arises an interesting
+question - Are the plants of the various isolated regions which enjoy
+a parity of climate and other conditions, identical or the reverse?&nbsp;
+The answer is - that in such regions the vegetation bears a general
+resemblance, but the <i>species</i> are nearly all different, and there
+is even, in a considerable measure, a diversity of families.</p>
+<p>The general facts have been thus stated: in the arctic and antarctic
+regions, and in those parts of lower latitudes, which, from their elevation,
+possess the same cold climate, there is always a similar or analogous
+vegetation, but few species are common to the various situations.&nbsp;
+In like manner, the intertropical vegetation of Asia, Africa, and America,
+are specifically different, though generally similar.&nbsp; The southern
+region of America is equally diverse from that of Africa, a country
+similar in clime, but separated by a vast extent of ocean.&nbsp; The
+vegetation of Australia, another region similarly placed in respect
+of clime, is even more peculiar.&nbsp; These facts are the more remarkable
+when we discover that, in most instances, the plants of one region have
+thriven when transplanted to another of parallel clime.&nbsp; This would
+shew that parity of conditions does not lead to a parity of productions
+so exact as to include identity of species, or even genera.&nbsp; Besides
+the various isolated regions here enumerated, there are some others
+indicated by naturalists as exhibiting a vegetation equally peculiar.&nbsp;
+Some of these are isolated by mountains, or the interposition of sandy
+wastes.&nbsp; For example, the temperate region of the elder continent
+is divided about the centre of Asia, and the east of that line is different
+from the west.&nbsp; So also is the same region divided in North America
+by the Rocky Mountains.&nbsp; Abyssinia and Nubia constitute another
+distinct botanical region.&nbsp; De Candolle enumerates in all twenty
+well-marked portions of the earth&rsquo;s surface which are peculiar
+with respect to vegetation; a number which would be greatly increased
+if remote islands and isolated mountain ranges were to be included.</p>
+<p>When we come to the zoology, we find precisely similar results, excepting
+that man (with, perhaps, some of the less conspicuous forms of being)
+is universal, and that several tribes, as the bear and dog, appear to
+have passed by the land connexion from the arctic regions of the eastern
+to those of the western hemisphere.&nbsp; &ldquo;With these exceptions,&rdquo;
+says Dr. Prichard, &ldquo;and without any others, as far as zoological
+researches have yet gone, it may be asserted that no individual species
+are common to distant regions.&nbsp; In parallel climates, analogous
+species replace each other; sometimes, but not frequently, the same
+genus is found in two separate continents; but the species which are
+natives of one region are not identical with corresponding races indigenous
+in the opposite hemisphere.</p>
+<p>&ldquo;A similar result arises when we compare the three great intertropical
+regions, as well as the extreme spaces of the three great continents,
+which advance into the temperate climates of the southern hemisphere.</p>
+<p>&ldquo;Thus, the tribes of simi&aelig;, (monkeys,) of the dog and
+cat kinds, of pachyderms, including elephants, tapirs, rhinoceroses,
+hogs, of bats, of saurian and ophidian reptiles, as well of birds and
+other terrene animals, are all different in the three great continents.&nbsp;
+In the lower departments of the mammiferous family, we find that the
+bruta, or edendata, (sloths, armadillos, &amp;c.,) of Africa, are differently
+organized from those of America, and these again from the tribes found
+in the Malayan archipelago and Terra Australis.&rdquo; <a name="citation255"></a><a href="#footnote255">{255}</a></p>
+<p>It does not appear that the diversity between the similar regions
+of Africa, Asia, and America, is occasioned in all instances by any
+disqualification of these countries to support precisely the same genera
+or species.&nbsp; The ox, horse, goat, &amp;c., of the elder continent
+have thriven and extended themselves in the new, and many of the indigenous
+tribes of America would no doubt flourish in corresponding climates
+in Europe, Asia, and Africa.&nbsp; It has, however, been remarked by
+naturalists unacquainted with the Macleay system, that the larger and
+more powerful animals of their respective orders belong to the elder
+continent, and that thus the animals of America, unlike the features
+of inanimate nature, appear to be upon a small scale.&nbsp; The swiftest
+and most agile animals, and a large proportion of those most useful
+to man, are also natives of the elder continent.&nbsp; On the other
+hand, the bulk of the edentata, a group remarkable for defects and meanness
+of organization, are American.&nbsp; The zoology of America may be said,
+upon the whole, to recede from that of Asia, &ldquo;and perhaps in a
+greater degree,&rdquo; adds Dr. Prichard, &ldquo;from that of Africa.&rdquo;&nbsp;
+A much greater recession is, however, observed in both the botany and
+zoology of Australia.</p>
+<p>There &ldquo;we do not find, in the great masses of vegetation, either
+the majesty of the virgin forests of America, or the variety and elegance
+of those of Asia, or the delicacy and freshness of the woods of our
+temperate countries of Europe.&nbsp; The vegetation is generally gloomy
+and sad; it has the aspect of our evergreens or heaths; the plants are
+for the most part woody; the leaves of nearly all the plants are linear,
+lanceolated, small, coriaceous, and spinescent.&nbsp; The grasses, which
+elsewhere are generally soft and flexible, participate in the stiffness
+of the other vegetables.&nbsp; The greater part of the plants of New
+Holland belong to new genera; and those included in the genera already
+known are of new species.&nbsp; The natural families which prevail are
+those of the heaths, the prote&aelig;, composit&aelig;, leguminos&aelig;,
+and myrthoide&aelig;; the larger trees all belong to the last family.&rdquo;
+<a name="citation257"></a><a href="#footnote257">{257}</a></p>
+<p>The prevalent animals of Australia are not less peculiar.&nbsp; It
+is well known that none above the marsupialia, or pouched animals, are
+native to it.&nbsp; The most conspicuous are these marsupials, which
+exist in great varieties here, though unknown in the elder continent,
+and only found in a few mean forms in America.&nbsp; Next to them are
+the monotremata, which are entirely peculiar to this portion of the
+earth.&nbsp; Now these are animals at the bottom of the mammiferous
+class, adjoining to that of birds, of whose character and organization
+the monotremata largely partake, the ornithorynchus presenting the bill
+and feet of a duck, producing its young in eggs, and having, like birds,
+a clavicle between the two shoulders.&nbsp; The birds of Australia vary
+in structure and plumage, but all have some singularity about them -
+the swan, for instance, is black.&nbsp; The country abounds in reptiles,
+and the prevalent fishes are of the early kinds, having a cartilaginous
+structure.</p>
+<p>Altogether, the plants and animals of this minor continent convey
+the impression of an early system of things, such as might be displayed
+in other parts of the earth about the time of the oolite.&nbsp; In connexion
+with this circumstance, it is a fact of some importance, that the geognostic
+character of Australia, its vast arid plains, its little diversified
+surface and consequent paucity of streams, and the very slight development
+of volcanic rock on its surface, seem to indicate a system of physical
+conditions, such as we may suppose to have existed elsewhere in the
+oolitic era: perhaps we see the chalk formation preparing there in the
+vast coral beds frontiering the coast.&nbsp; Australia thus appears
+as a portion of the earth which has, from some unknown causes, been
+belated in its physical and organic development.&nbsp; And certainly
+the greater part of its surface is not fitted to be an advantageous
+place of residence for beings above the marsupialia, and judging from
+analogy, it may yet be subjected to a series of changes in the highest
+degree inconvenient to any human beings who may have settled upon it.</p>
+<p>The general conclusions regarding the geography of organic nature,
+may be thus stated.&nbsp; (1.) There are numerous distinct foci of organic
+production throughout the earth.&nbsp; (2.) These have everywhere advanced
+in accordance with the local conditions of climate &amp;c., as far as
+at least the class and order are concerned, a diversity taking place
+in the lower gradations.&nbsp; No physical or geographical reason appearing
+for this diversity, we are led to infer that, (3,) it is the result
+of minute and inappreciable causes giving the law of organic development
+a particular direction in the lower subdivisions of the two kingdoms.&nbsp;
+(4.) Development has not gone on to equal results in the various continents,
+being most advanced in the eastern continent, next in the western, and
+least in Australia, this inequality being perhaps the result of the
+comparative antiquity of the various regions, geologically and geographically.</p>
+<p>It must at the same time be admitted that the line of organic development
+has nowhere required for its advance the whole of the families comprehended
+in the two kingdoms, seeing that some of these are confined to one continent,
+and some to another, without a conceivable possibility of one having
+been connected with the other in the way of ancestry.&nbsp; The two
+great families of quadrumana, cebid&aelig; and simiad&aelig;, are a
+noted instance, the one being exclusively American, while the other
+belongs entirely to the old world.&nbsp; There are many other cases
+in which the full circular group can only be completed by taking subdivisions
+from various continents.&nbsp; This would seem to imply that, while
+the entire system is so remarkable for its unity, it has nevertheless
+been produced in lines geographically detached, these lines perhaps
+consisting of particular typical groups placed in an independent succession,
+or of two or more of these groups.&nbsp; And for this idea there is,
+even in the present imperfect state of our knowledge of animated nature,
+some countenance in ascertained facts, the birds of Australia, for example,
+being chiefly of the suctorial type, while it may be presumed that the
+observation as to the predominance of the useful animals in the Old
+World, is not much different from saying that the rasorial type is there
+peculiarly abundant.&nbsp; It does not appear that the idea of independent
+lines, consisting of particular types, or sets of types, is necessarily
+inconsistent with the general hypothesis, as nothing yet ascertained
+of the Macleay system forbids their having an independent set of affinities.&nbsp;
+On this subject, however, there is as yet much obscurity, and it must
+be left to future inquirers to clear it up.</p>
+<p>We must now call to mind that the geographical distribution of plants
+and animals was very different in the geological ages from what it is
+now.&nbsp; Down to a time not long antecedent to man, the same vegetation
+overspread every clime, and a similar uniformity marked the zoology.&nbsp;
+This is conceived by M. Brogniart, with great plausibility, to have
+been the result of a uniformity of climate, produced by the as yet unexhausted
+effect of the internal heat of the earth upon its surface; whereas climate
+has since depended chiefly on external sources of heat, as modified
+by the various meteorological influences.&nbsp; However the early uniform
+climate was produced, certain it is that, from about the close of the
+geological epoch, plants and animals have been dispersed over the globe
+with a regard to their particular characters, and specimens of both
+are found so isolated in particular situations, as utterly to exclude
+the idea that they came thither from any common centre.&nbsp; It may
+be asked, - Considering that, in the geological epoch, species are not
+limited to particular regions, and that since the close of that epoch,
+they are very peculiarly limited, are we to presume the present organisms
+of the world to have been created <i>ab initio</i> after that time?&nbsp;
+To this it may be answered, - Not necessarily, as it so happens that
+animals begin to be much varied, or to appear in a considerable variety
+of species, towards the close of the geological history.&nbsp; It may
+have been that the multitudes of locally peculiar species only came
+into being after the uniform climate had passed away.&nbsp; It may have
+only been when a varied climate arose, that the originally few species
+branched off into the present extensive variety.</p>
+<p>A question of a very interesting kind will now probably arise in
+the reader&rsquo;s mind - <i>What place or status is assigned to man
+in the new natural system</i>.&nbsp; Before going into this inquiry,
+it is necessary to advert to several particulars of the natural system
+not yet noticed.</p>
+<p>It is necessary, in particular, to ascertain the grades which exist
+in the classification of animals.&nbsp; In the line of the aves, Mr.
+Swainson finds these to be nine, the species pica, for example, being
+thus indicated:-</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<pre>Kingdom&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Animalia.<br />Sub-kingdom&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Vertebrata.<br />Class&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Aves.<br />Order&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Incessores.<br />Tribe&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Conirostres.<br />Family&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Corvid&aelig;.<br />Sub-family&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Corvin&aelig;.<br />Genus&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Corvus.<br />Sub-genus, or species&nbsp; &nbsp; Pica.</pre>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>This brings us down to species, the subdivision where intermarriage
+or breeding is usually considered as natural to animals, and where a
+resemblance of offspring to parents is generally persevered in.&nbsp;
+The dog, for instance, is a species, because all dogs can breed together,
+and the progeny partakes of the appearances of the parents.&nbsp; The
+human race is held as a species, primarily for the same reasons.&nbsp;
+Species, however, is liable to another subdivision, which naturalists
+call variety; and variety appears to be subject to exactly the same
+system of <i>representation</i> which have been traced in species and
+higher denominations.&nbsp; In canis, for instance, the bull-dog and
+mastiff represent the ferocious sub-typical group; the waterdog is natatorial;
+we see the speed and length of muzzle of the suctorial group in the
+greyhound; and the bushy tail and gentle and serviceable character of
+the rasorial in the shepherd&rsquo;s dog and spaniel.&nbsp; Even the
+striped and spotted skin of the tiger and panther is reproduced in the
+more ferocious kind of dogs - an indication of a fundamental connexion
+between physical and mental qualities which we have also seen in the
+zebra, and which is likewise displayed in the predominance of a yellow
+colour in the vultures and owls in common with the lion and his congeners.</p>
+<p>It is by no means clearly made out that this system of nine gradations
+over and above that of variety applies in all departments of nature.&nbsp;
+On the contrary, even Mr. Swainson gives series in which several of
+them are omitted.&nbsp; It may be that, in some departments of nature,
+variation from the class or order has gone down into fewer shades than
+in others; or it may be, that many of the variations have not survived
+till our era, or have not been as yet detected by naturalists; in either
+of which cases there may be a necessity for shortening the series by
+the omission of one or two grades, as for instance <i>tribe</i> or <i>sub-family</i>.&nbsp;
+This, however, is much to be regretted, as it introduces an irregularity
+into the natural system, and consequently throws a difficulty and doubt
+in the way of our investigating it.&nbsp; With these preliminary remarks,
+I shall proceed to inquire what is the natural status of man.</p>
+<p>That man&rsquo;s place is to be looked for in the class mammalia
+and sub-kingdom vertebrata admits of no doubt, from his possessing both
+the characters on which these divisions are founded.&nbsp; When we descend,
+however, below the <i>class</i>, we find no settled views on the subject
+amongst naturalists.&nbsp; Mr. Swainson, who alone has given a review
+of the animal kingdom on the Macleay system, unfortunately writes on
+this subject in a manner which excites a suspicion as to his judgment.&nbsp;
+His arrangement of the first or typical order of the mammalia is therefore
+to be received with great hesitation.&nbsp; It is as follows:-</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<pre>Typical&nbsp; &nbsp; Quadrumana&nbsp; Pre-eminently organized for grasping.<br />Sub-typical Fer&aelig; . . .&nbsp; Claws retractile; carnivorous.<br />Natatorial&nbsp; Cetacea. .&nbsp; Pre-eminently aquatic; feet very short.<br />Suctorial&nbsp; Glires . .&nbsp; Muzzle lengthened and pointed.<br />Rasorial&nbsp; &nbsp; Ungulata .&nbsp; Crests and other processes on the head.</pre>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>He then takes the quadrumana, and places it in the following arrangement:-</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<pre>Typical . .&nbsp; Simiad&aelig;&nbsp; . . .&nbsp; (Monkeys of Old World.)<br />Sub-typical . Cebid&aelig;&nbsp; . . .&nbsp; (Monkeys of New World.)<br />Natatorial .&nbsp; Unknown&nbsp; .<br />Suctorial . . Vespertilionid&aelig; (Bats.)<br />Rasorial .&nbsp; &nbsp; Lemurid&aelig; . .&nbsp; . (Lemurs.)</pre>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>He considers the simiad&aelig; as a complete circle, and argues thence
+that there is no room in the range of the animal kingdom for man.&nbsp;
+Man, he says, is not a constituent part of any circle, for, if he were,
+there ought to be other animals on each hand having affinity to him,
+whereas there are none, the resemblance of the orangs being one of mere
+analogy.&nbsp; Mr. Swainson therefore considers our race as standing
+apart, and forming a link between the unintelligent order of beings
+and the angels!&nbsp; And this in spite of the glaring fact that, in
+our teeth, hands, and other features grounded on by naturalists as characteristic,
+we do not differ more from the simiad&aelig; than the bats do from the
+lemurs - in spite also of that resemblance of analogy to the orangs
+which he himself admits, and which, at the least, must be held to imply
+a certain relation.&nbsp; He also overlooks that, though there may be
+no room for man in the circle of the simiad&aelig;, (this, indeed, is
+quite true,) there may be in the order, where he actually leaves a place
+entirely blank, or only to be filled up, as he suggests, by mermen!
+<a name="citation266"></a><a href="#footnote266">{266}</a>&nbsp; Another
+argument in his arrangement is, that it leaves the grades of classification
+very much abridged, there being at the most seven instead of nine.&nbsp;
+But serious argument on a theory so preposterous may be considered as
+nearly thrown away.&nbsp; I shall therefore at once proceed to suggest
+a new arrangement of this portion of the animal kingdom, in which man
+is allowed the place to which he is zoologically entitled.</p>
+<p>I propose that the typical order of the mammalia should be designated
+cheirotheria, from the sole character which is universal amongst them,
+their possessing hands, and with a regard to that pre-eminent qualification
+for grasping which has been ascribed to them - an analogy to the perching
+habit of the typical order of birds, which is worthy of particular notice.&nbsp;
+The tribes of the cheirotheria I arrange as follows:-</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<pre>Typical&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Bimana.<br />Sub-typical&nbsp; &nbsp; Simiad&aelig;.<br />Natatorial&nbsp; &nbsp; Vespertilionid&aelig;.<br />Suctorial&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Lemurid&aelig;.<br />Rasorial&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Cebid&aelig;.</pre>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>Here man is put into the typical place, as the genuine head, not
+only of this order, but of the whole animal world.&nbsp; The double
+affinity which is requisite is obtained, for here he has the simiad&aelig;
+on one hand, and the cebid&aelig; on the other.&nbsp; The five tribes
+of the order are completed, the vespertilionid&aelig; being shifted
+(provisionally) into the natatorial place, for which their appropriateness
+is so far evidenced by the aquatic habits of several of the tribe, and
+the lemurid&aelig; into the suctorial, to which their length of muzzle
+and remarkable saltatory power are highly suitable.&nbsp; At the same
+time, the simiad&aelig; are degraded from the typical place, to which
+they have no sort of pretension, and placed where their mean and mischievous
+character seem to require; the cebid&aelig; again being assigned that
+situation which their comparatively inoffensive dispositions, their
+arboreal habits, and their extraordinary development of the tail, (which
+with them is like a fifth hand,) render so proper.</p>
+<p>The zoological status thus assigned to the human race is precisely
+what might be expected.&nbsp; In order to understand its full value,
+it is necessary to observe how the various type peculiarities operate
+in fixing the character of the animals ranked in them.&nbsp; It is easy
+to conceive that they must be, in some instances, much mixed up with
+each other, and consequently obscured.&nbsp; If an animal, for example,
+is the suctorial member of a circle of species, forming the natatorial
+type of genera, forming a family or sub-family which in its turn is
+rasorial, its qualities must evidently be greatly mingled and ill to
+define.&nbsp; But, on the other hand, if we take the rapacious or sub-typical
+group of birds, and look in it for the tribe which is again the rapacious
+or sub-typical group of its order, we may expect to find the qualities
+of that group exalted or intensified, and accordingly made the more
+conspicuous.&nbsp; Such is really the case with the vultures, in the
+rapacious birds, a family remarkable above all of their order for their
+carnivorous and foul habits.&nbsp; So, also, if we take the typical
+group of the birds, the incessores or perchers, and look in it for its
+typical group, the conirostres, and seek there again for the typical
+family of that group, the corvid&aelig;, we may expect to find a very
+marked superiority in organization and character.&nbsp; Such is really
+the case.&nbsp; &ldquo;The crow,&rdquo; says Mr. Swainson, &ldquo;unites
+in itself a greater number of properties than are to be found individually
+in any other genus of birds; as if in fact it had taken from all the
+other orders a portion of their peculiar qualities, for the purpose
+of exhibiting in what manner they could be combined.&nbsp; From the
+rapacious birds this &ldquo;type of types,&rdquo; as the crow has been
+justly called, takes the power of soaring in the air, and of seizing
+upon living birds, like the hawks, while its habit of devouring putrid
+substances, and picking out the eyes of young animals, is borrowed from
+the vultures.&nbsp; From the scansorial or climbing order it takes the
+faculty of picking the ground, and discovering its food when hidden
+from the eye, while the parrot family gives it the taste for vegetable
+food, and furnishes it with great cunning, sagacity, and powers of imitation,
+even to counterfeiting the human voice.&nbsp; Next come the order of
+waders, who impart their quota to the perfection of the crow by giving
+it great powers of flight, and perfect facility in walking, such being
+among the chief attributes of the suctorial order.&nbsp; Lastly, the
+aquatic birds contribute their portion, by giving this terrestrial bird
+the power of feeding not only on fish, which are their peculiar food,
+but actually of occasionally catching it. <a name="citation270"></a><a href="#footnote270">{270}</a>&nbsp;
+In this wonderful manner do we find the crow partially invested with
+the united properties of all other birds, while in its own order, that
+of the incessores or perchers, it stands the pre-eminent type.&nbsp;
+We cannot also fail to regard it as a remarkable proof of the superior
+organization and character of the corvid&aelig;, that they are adapted
+for all climates, and accordingly found all over the world.</p>
+<p>Mr. Swainson&rsquo;s description of the zoological status of the
+crow, written without the least design of throwing any light upon that
+of man, evidently does so in a remarkable degree.&nbsp; It prepares
+us to expect in the place among the mammalia, corresponding to that
+of the corvid&aelig; in the aves, a being or set of beings possessing
+a remarkable concentration of qualities from all the other groups of
+their order, but in general character as far above the corvid&aelig;
+as a typical group is above an aberrant one, the mammalia above the
+aves.&nbsp; Can any of the simiad&aelig; pretend to such a place, narrowly
+and imperfectly endowed as these creatures are - a mean reflection apparently
+of something higher?&nbsp; Assuredly not, and in this consideration
+alone Mr. Swainson&rsquo;s arrangement must fall to the ground.&nbsp;
+To fill worthily so lofty a station in the animated families man alone
+is competent.&nbsp; In him only is to be found that concentration of
+qualities from all the other groups of his order which has been described
+as marking the corvid&aelig;.&nbsp; That grasping power, which has been
+selected as the leading physical quality of his order, is nowhere so
+beautifully or so powerfully developed as in his hand.&nbsp; The intelligence
+and teachableness of the simiad&aelig; rise to a climax in his pre-eminent
+mental nature.&nbsp; His sub-analogy to the fer&aelig; is marked by
+his canine teeth, and the universality of his rapacity, for where is
+the department of animated nature which he does not without scruple
+sacrifice to his convenience?&nbsp; With sanguinary, he has also gentle
+and domesticable dispositions, thus reflecting the characters of the
+ungulata, (the rasorial type of the class,) to which we perhaps see
+a further analogy in the use which he makes of the surface of the earth
+as a source of food.&nbsp; To the aquatic type his love of maritime
+adventure very readily assimilates him; and how far the suctorial is
+represented in his nature it is hardly necessary to say.&nbsp; As the
+corvid&aelig;, too, are found in every part of the earth - almost the
+only one of the inferior animals which has been acknowledged as universal
+- so do we find man.&nbsp; He thrives in all climates, and with regard
+to style of living, can adapt himself to an infinitely greater diversity
+of circumstances than any other animated creature.</p>
+<p>Man, then, considered zoologically, and without regard to the distinct
+character assigned to him by theology, simply takes his place as the
+type of all types of the animal kingdom, the true and unmistakable head
+of animated nature upon this earth.&nbsp; It will readily occur that
+some more particular investigations into the ranks of types might throw
+additional light on man&rsquo;s status, and perhaps his nature; and
+such light we may hope to obtain when the philosophy of zoology shall
+have been studied as it deserves.&nbsp; Perhaps some such diagram as
+the one given on the next page will be found to be an approximation
+to the expression of the merely natural or secular grade of man in comparison
+with other animals.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<pre>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; /&nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; /&nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; /&nbsp; &nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; /|&nbsp; &nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/ |&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; / |&nbsp; &nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; /| |&nbsp; &nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/|&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; / | |&nbsp; &nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/ |&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; /| | |&nbsp; &nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;/| |&nbsp; |&nbsp; &nbsp; / | | |&nbsp; &nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;/ | |&nbsp; |&nbsp; /| | | |&nbsp; &nbsp; |<br />&nbsp;/| | |&nbsp; |&nbsp; / | | | |&nbsp; &nbsp; |<br />+-1-2-3--4-+--a-b-c-d----+ <a name="citation274"></a><a href="#footnote274">{274}</a></pre>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>Here the upright lines, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, may represent the comparative
+height and grade of organization of both the five sub-kingdoms, and
+the five classes of each of these; 5 being the vertebrata in the one
+case, and the mammalia in the other.&nbsp; The difference between the
+height of the line 1 and the line 5 gives an idea of the difference
+of being the head type of the aves, (corvid&aelig;,) and the head type
+of the mammalia, (bimana;) <i>a</i>. <i>b. c. d</i>.&nbsp; 5, again,
+represent the five groups of the first order of the mammalia; <i>a</i>,
+being the organic structure of the highest simia, and 5, that of man.&nbsp;
+A set of tangent lines of this kind may yet prove one of the most satisfactory
+means of ascertaining the height and breadth of the psychology of our
+species.</p>
+<p>It may be asked, - Is the existing human race the only species designed
+to occupy the grade to which it is here referred?&nbsp; Such a question
+evidently ought not to be answered rashly; and I shall therefore confine
+myself to the admission that, judging by analogy, we might expect to
+see several varieties of the being, homo.&nbsp; There is no other family
+approaching to this in importance, which presents but one species.&nbsp;
+The corvid&aelig;, our parallel in aves, consist of several distinct
+genera and sub-genera.&nbsp; It is startling to find such an appearance
+of imperfection in the circle to which man belongs, and the ideas which
+rise in consequence are not less startling.&nbsp; Is our race but the
+initial of the grand crowning type?&nbsp; Are there yet to be species
+superior to us in organization, purer in feeling, more powerful in device
+and act, and who shall take a rule over us!&nbsp; There is in this nothing
+improbable on other grounds.&nbsp; The present race, rude and impulsive
+as it is, is perhaps the best adapted to the present state of things
+in the world; but the external world goes through slow and gradual changes,
+which may leave it in time a much serener field of existence.&nbsp;
+There may then be occasion for a nobler type of humanity, which shall
+complete the zoological circle on this planet, and realize some of the
+dreams of the purest spirits of the present race.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>EARLY HISTORY OF MANKIND.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>The human race is known to consist of numerous nations, displaying
+considerable differences of external form and colour, and speaking in
+general different languages.&nbsp; This has been the case since the
+commencement of written record.&nbsp; It is also ascertained that the
+external peculiarities of particular nations do not rapidly change.&nbsp;
+There is rather a tendency to a persistency of type in all lines of
+descent, insomuch that a subordinate admixture of various type is usually
+obliterated in a few generations.&nbsp; Numerous as the varieties are,
+they have all been found classifiable under five leading ones:- 1.&nbsp;
+The Caucasian or Indo-European, which extends from India into Europe
+and Northern Africa; 2.&nbsp; The Mongolian, which occupies Northern
+and Eastern Asia; 3.&nbsp; The Malayan, which extends from the Ultra-Gangetic
+Peninsula into the numerous islands of the South Sea and Pacific; 4.&nbsp;
+The Negro, chiefly confined to Africa; 5.&nbsp; The aboriginal American.&nbsp;
+Each of these is distinguished by certain general features of so marked
+a kind, as to give rise to a supposition that they have had distinct
+or independent origins.&nbsp; Of these peculiarities, colour is the
+most conspicuous: the Caucasians are generally white, the Mongolians
+yellow, the Negroes black, and the Americans red.&nbsp; The opposition
+of two of these in particular, white and black, is so striking, that
+of them, at least, it seems almost necessary to suppose separate origins.&nbsp;
+Of late years, however, the whole of this question has been subjected
+to a rigorous investigation, and it has been successfully shewn that
+the human race might have had one origin, for anything that can be inferred
+from external peculiarities.</p>
+<p>It appears from this inquiry, <a name="citation278"></a><a href="#footnote278">{278}</a>
+that colour and other physiological characters are of a more superficial
+and accidental nature than was at one time supposed.&nbsp; One fact
+is at the very first extremely startling, that there are nations, such
+as the inhabitants of Hindostan, known to be one in descent, which nevertheless
+contain groups of people of almost all shades of colour, and likewise
+discrepant in other of those important features on which much stress
+has been laid.&nbsp; Some other facts, which I may state in brief terms,
+are scarcely less remarkable.&nbsp; In Africa, there are Negro nations,
+- that is, nations of intensely black complexion, as the Jolofs, Mandingoes,
+and Kafirs, whose features and limbs are as elegant as those of the
+best European nations.&nbsp; While we have no proof of Negro races becoming
+white in the course of generations, the converse may be held as established,
+for there are Arab and Jewish families of ancient settlement in Northern
+Africa, who have become as black as the other inhabitants.&nbsp; There
+are also facts which seem to shew the possibility of a natural transition
+by generation from the black to the white complexion, and from the white
+to the black.&nbsp; True whites (apart from Albinoes) are not unfrequently
+born among the Negroes, and the tendency to this singularity is transmitted
+in families.&nbsp; There is, at least, one authentic instance of a set
+of perfectly black children being born to an Arab couple, in whose ancestry
+no such blood had intermingled.&nbsp; This occurred in the valley of
+the Jordan, where it is remarkable that the Arab population in general
+have flatter features, darker skins, and coarser hair, than any other
+tribes of the same nation. <a name="citation280"></a><a href="#footnote280">{280}</a></p>
+<p>The style of living is ascertained to have a powerful effect in modifying
+the human figure in the course of generations, and this even in its
+osseous structure.&nbsp; About two hundred years ago, a number of people
+were driven by a barbarous policy from the counties of Antrim and Down,
+in Ireland, towards the sea-coast, where they have ever since been settled,
+but in unusually miserable circumstances, even for Ireland; and the
+consequence is, that they exhibit peculiar features of the most repulsive
+kind, projecting jaws with large open mouths, depressed noses, high
+cheek bones, and bow legs, together with an extremely diminutive stature.&nbsp;
+These, with an abnormal slenderness of the limbs, are the outward marks
+of a low and barbarous condition all over the world; it is particularly
+seen in the Australian aborigines.&nbsp; On the other hand, the beauty
+of the higher ranks in England is very remarkable, being, in the main,
+as clearly a result of good external conditions.&nbsp; &ldquo;Coarse,
+unwholesome, and ill-prepared food,&rdquo; says Buffon, &ldquo;makes
+the human race degenerate.&nbsp; All those people who live miserably
+are ugly and ill-made.&nbsp; Even in France, the country people are
+not so beautiful as those who live in towns; and I have often remarked
+that in those villages where the people are richer and better fed than
+in others, the men are likewise more handsome, and have better countenances.&rdquo;&nbsp;
+He might have added, that elegant and commodious dwellings, cleanly
+habits, comfortable clothing, and being exposed to the open air only
+as much as health requires, cooperate with food in increasing the elegance
+of a race of human beings.</p>
+<p>Subject only to these modifying agencies, there is, as has been said,
+a remarkable persistency in national features and forms, insomuch that
+a single individual thrown into a family different from himself is absorbed
+in it, and all trace of him lost after a few generations.&nbsp; But
+while there is such a persistency to ordinary observation, it would
+also appear that nature has a power of producing new varieties, though
+this is only done rarely.&nbsp; Such novelties of type abound in the
+vegetable world, are seen more rarely in the animal circle, and perhaps
+are least frequent of occurrence in our own race.&nbsp; There is a noted
+instance in the production, on a New England farm, of a variety of sheep
+with unusually short legs, which was kept up by breeding, on account
+of the convenience in that country of having sheep which are unable
+to jump over low fences.&nbsp; The starting and main taming a <i>breed</i>
+of cattle, that is, a variety marked by some desirable peculiarity,
+are familiar to a large class of persons.&nbsp; It appears only necessary,
+when a variety has been thus produced, that a union should take place
+between individuals similarly characterized, in order to establish it.&nbsp;
+Early in the last century, a man named Lambert, was born in Suffolk,
+with semi-horny excrescences of about half an inch long, thickly growing
+all over his body.&nbsp; The peculiarity was transmitted to his children,
+and was last heard of in a third generation.&nbsp; The peculiarity of
+six fingers on the hand and six toes on the feet, appears in like manner
+in families which have no record or tradition of such a peculiarity
+having affected them at any former period, and it is then sometimes
+seen to descend through several generations.&nbsp; It was Mr. Lawrence&rsquo;s
+opinion, that a pair, in which both parties were so distinguished, might
+be the progenitors of a new variety of the race who would be thus marked
+in all future time.&nbsp; It is not easy to surmise the causes which
+operate in producing such varieties.&nbsp; Perhaps they are simply types
+in nature, <i>possible to be realized under certain appropriate conditions</i>,
+but which conditions are such as altogether to elude notice.&nbsp; I
+might cite as examples of such possible types, the rise of whites amongst
+the Negroes, the occurrence of the family of black children in the valley
+of the Jordan, and the comparatively frequent birth of red-haired children
+amongst not only the Mongolian and Malayan families, but amongst the
+Negroes.&nbsp; We are ignorant of the laws of variety-production; but
+we see it going on as a principle in nature, and it is obviously favourable
+to the supposition that all the great families of men are of one stock.</p>
+<p>The tendency of the modern study of the languages of nations is to
+the same point.&nbsp; The last fifty years have seen this study elevated
+to the character of a science, and the light which it throws upon the
+history of mankind is of a most remarkable nature.</p>
+<p>Following a natural analogy, philologists have thrown the earth&rsquo;s
+languages into a kind of classification: a number bearing a considerable
+resemblance to each other, and in general geographically near, are styled
+a <i>group</i> or <i>sub-family</i>; several groups, again, are associated
+as a <i>family</i>, with regard to more general features of resemblance.&nbsp;
+Six families are spoken of.</p>
+<p>The Indo-European family nearly coincides in geographical limits
+with those which have been assigned to that variety of mankind which
+generally shews a fair complexion, called the Caucasian variety.&nbsp;
+It may be said to commence in India, and thence to stretch through Persia
+into Europe, the whole of which it occupies, excepting Hungary, the
+Basque provinces of Spain, and Finland.&nbsp; Its sub-families are the
+Sanskrit, or ancient language of India, the Persian, the Slavonic, Celtic,
+Gothic, and Pelasgian.&nbsp; The Slavonic includes the modern languages
+of Russia and Poland.&nbsp; Under the Gothic, are (1) the Scandinavian
+tongues, the Norske, Swedish, and Danish; and (2) the Teutonic, to which
+belong the modern German, the Dutch, and our own Anglo-Saxon.&nbsp;
+I give the name of Pelasgian to the group scattered along the north
+shores of the Mediterranean, the Greek and Latin, including the modifications
+of the latter under the names of Italian, Spanish, &amp;c.&nbsp; The
+Celtic was from two to three thousand years ago, the speech of a considerable
+tribe dwelling in Western Europe; but these have since been driven before
+superior nations into a few corners, and are now only to be found in
+the highlands of Scotland, Ireland, Wales, Cornwall, and certain parts
+of France.&nbsp; The Gaelic of Scotland, Erse of Ireland, and the Welsh,
+are the only living branches of this sub-family of languages.</p>
+<p>The resemblances amongst languages are of two kinds, - identity of
+words, and identity of grammatical forms; the latter being now generally
+considered as the most important towards the argument.&nbsp; When we
+inquire into the first kind of affinity among the languages of the Indo-European
+family, we are surprised at the great number of common terms which exist
+amongst them, and these referring to such primary ideas, as to leave
+no doubt of their having all been derived from a common source.&nbsp;
+Colonel Vans Kennedy presents nine hundred words common to the Sanskrit
+and other languages of the same family.&nbsp; In the Sanskrit and Persian,
+we find several which require no sort of translation to an English reader,
+as <i>pader</i>, <i>mader</i>, <i>sunu</i>, <i>dokhter</i>, <i>brader</i>,
+<i>mand</i>, <i>vidhava</i>; likewise <i>asthi</i>, a bone, (Greek,
+<i>ostoun</i>;) <i>denta</i>, a tooth, (Latin, <i>dens</i>, <i>dentis</i>;)
+<i>eyeumen</i>, the eye; <i>brouwa</i>, the eye-brow, (German, <i>braue</i>;)
+<i>nasa</i>, the nose; <i>karu</i>, the hand, (Gr. <i>cheir</i>;)<i>
+genu</i>, the knee, (Lat. <i>genu</i>;)<i> ped</i>, the foot, (Lat.
+<i>pes</i>, <i>pedis</i>;) <i>hrti</i>, the heart; <i>jecur</i>, the
+liver, (Lat. <i>jecur</i>;)<i> stara</i>, a star; <i>gela</i>, cold,
+(Lat. <i>gelu</i>, ice;)<i> aghni</i>, fire, (Lat. <i>ignis</i>;)<i>
+dhara</i>, the earth, (Lat. <i>terra</i>, Gaelic, <i>tir</i>;)<i> arrivi</i>,
+a river; <i>nau</i>, a ship, (Gr. <i>naus</i>, Lat. <i>navis</i>;)<i>
+ghau</i>, a cow; <i>sarpam</i>, a serpent.</p>
+<p>The inferences from these verbal coincidences were confirmed in a
+striking manner when Bopp and others investigated the grammatical structure
+of this family of languages.&nbsp; Dr. Wiseman pronounces that the great
+philologist just named, &ldquo;by a minute and sagacious analysis of
+the Sanskrit verb, compared with the conjugational system of the other
+members of this family, left no doubt of their intimate and positive
+affinity.&rdquo;&nbsp; It was now discovered that the peculiar terminations
+or inflections by which persons are expressed throughout the verbs of
+nearly the whole of these languages, have their foundations in pronouns;
+the pronoun was simply placed at the end, and thus became an inflexion.&nbsp;
+&ldquo;By an analysis of the Sanskrit pronouns, the elements of those
+existing in all the other languages were cleared of their anomalies;
+the verb substantive, which in Latin is composed of fragments referable
+to two distinct roots, here found both existing in regular form; the
+Greek conjugations, with all their complicated machinery of middle voice,
+augments, and reduplications, were here found and illustrated in a variety
+of ways, which a few years ago would have appeared chimerical.&nbsp;
+Even our own language may sometimes receive light from the study of
+distant members of our family.&nbsp; Where, for instance, are we to
+seek for the root of our comparative <i>better</i>?&nbsp; Certainly
+not in its positive, good, nor in the Teutonic dialects in which the
+same anomaly exists.&nbsp; But in the Persian we have precisely the
+same comparative, <i>behter</i>, with exactly the same signification,
+regularly formed from its positive <i>beh</i>, good.&rdquo; <a name="citation287"></a><a href="#footnote287">{287}</a></p>
+<p>The second great family is the <i>Syro-Ph&oelig;nician</i>, comprising
+the Hebrew, Syro-Chaldaic, Arabic, and Gheez or Abyssinian, being localized
+principally in the countries to the west and south of the Mediterranean.&nbsp;
+Beyond them, again, is the African family, which, as far as research
+has gone, seems to be in like manner marked by common features, both
+verbal and grammatical.&nbsp; The fourth is the Polynesian family, extending
+from Madagascar on the west through all the Indian Archipelago, besides
+taking in the Malayan dialect from the continent of India, and comprehending
+Australia and the islands of the western portion of the Pacific.&nbsp;
+This family, however, bears such an affinity to that next to be described,
+that Dr. Leyden and some others do not give it a distinct place as a
+family of languages.</p>
+<p>The fifth family is the Chinese, embracing a large part of China,
+and most of the regions of Central and Northern Asia.&nbsp; The leading
+features of the Chinese are, its consisting altogether of monosyllables,
+and being destitute of all grammatical forms, except certain arrangements
+and accentuations, which vary the sense of particular words.&nbsp; It
+is also deficient in some of the consonants most conspicuous in other
+languages, b, d, r, v, and z; so that this people can scarcely pronounce
+our speech in such a way as to be intelligible: for example, the word
+Christus they call <i>Kuliss-ut-oo-suh</i>.&nbsp; The Chinese, strange
+to say, though they early attained to a remarkable degree of civilization,
+and have preceded the Europeans in many of the most important inventions,
+have a language which resembles that of children, or deaf and dumb people.&nbsp;
+The sentence of short, simple, unconnected words, in which an infant
+amongst us attempts to express some of its wants and its ideas - the
+equally broken and difficult terms which the deaf and dumb express by
+signs, as the following passage of the Lord&rsquo;s Prayer: - &ldquo;Our
+Father, heaven in, wish your name respect, wish your soul&rsquo;s kingdom
+providence arrive, wish your will do heaven earth equality,&rdquo; &amp;c.
+- these are like the discourse of the refined people of the so-called
+Celestial Empire.&nbsp; An attempt was made by the Abb&eacute; Sicard
+to teach the deaf and dumb grammatical signs; but they persisted in
+restricting themselves to the simple signs of ideas, leaving the structure
+undetermined by any but the natural order of connexion.&nbsp; Such is
+exactly the condition of the Chinese language.</p>
+<p>Crossing the Pacific, we come to the last great family in the languages
+of the aboriginal Americans, which have all of them features in common,
+proving them to constitute a group by themselves, without any regard
+to the very different degrees of civilization which these nations had
+attained at the time of the discovery.&nbsp; The common resemblance
+is in the grammatical structure as well as in words, and the grammatical
+structure of this family is of a very peculiar and complicated kind.&nbsp;
+The general character in this respect has caused the term Polysynthetic
+to be applied to the American languages.&nbsp; A long many-syllabled
+word is used by the rude Algonquins and Delawares to express a whole
+sentence: for example, a woman of the latter nation, playing with a
+little dog or cat, would perhaps be heard saying, &ldquo;<i>kuligatschis</i>,&rdquo;
+meaning, &ldquo;give me your pretty little paw;&rdquo; the word, on
+examination, is found to be made up in this manner: <i>k</i>, the second
+personal pronoun; <i>uli</i>, part of the word wulet, pretty; <i>gat</i>,
+part of the word wichgat, signifying a leg or paw; <i>schis</i>, conveying
+the idea of littleness.&nbsp; In the same tongue, a youth is called
+pilape, a word compounded from the first part of pilsit, innocent, and
+the latter part of lenape, a man.&nbsp; Thus, it will be observed, a
+number of parts of words are taken and thrown together, by a process
+which has been happily termed <i>agglutination</i>, so as to form one
+word, conveying a complicated idea.&nbsp; There is also an elaborate
+system of inflection; in nouns, for instance, there is one kind of inflection
+to express the presence or absence of vitality, and another to express
+number.&nbsp; The genius of the language has been described as accumulative:
+it &ldquo;tends rather to add syllables or letters, making farther distinctions
+in objects already before the mind, than to introduce new words.&rdquo;
+<a name="citation291"></a><a href="#footnote291">{291}</a>&nbsp; Yet
+it has also been shewn very distinctly, that these languages are based
+in words of one syllable, like those of the Chinese and Polynesian families;
+all the primary ideas are thus expressed: the elaborate system of inflection
+and agglutination is shewn to be simply a farther development of the
+language-forming principle, as it may be called - or the Chinese system
+may be described as an arrestment of this principle at a particular
+early point.&nbsp; It has been fully shewn, that between the structure
+of the American and other families, sufficient affinities exist to make
+a common origin or early connexion extremely likely.&nbsp; The verbal
+affinities are also very considerable.&nbsp; Humboldt says, &ldquo;In
+eighty-three American languages examined by Messrs. Barton and Vater,
+one hundred and seventy words have been found, the roots of which appear
+to be the same; and it is easy to perceive that this analogy is not
+accidental, since it does not rest merely upon imitative harmony, or
+on that conformity of organs which produces almost a perfect identity
+in the first sounds articulated by children.&nbsp; Of these one hundred
+and seventy words which have this connexion, three-fifths resemble the
+Manchou, the Tongouse, the Mongal, and the Samoyed; and two-fifths,
+the Celtic and Tchoud, the Biscayan, the Coptic, and Congo languages.&nbsp;
+These words have been found by comparing the whole of the American languages
+with the whole of those of the Old World; for hitherto we are acquainted
+with no American idiom which seems to have an exclusive correspondence
+with any of the Asiatic, African, or European tongues.&rdquo; <a name="citation293"></a><a href="#footnote293">{293}</a>&nbsp;
+Humboldt and others considered these words as brought into America by
+recent immigrants; an idea resting on no proof, and which seems at once
+refuted by the common words being chiefly those which represent primary
+ideas; besides, we now know, what was not formerly perceived or admitted,
+that there are great affinities of structure also.&nbsp; I may here
+refer to a curious mathematical calculation by Dr. Thomas Young, to
+the effect, that if three words coincide in two different languages,
+it is ten to one they must be derived in both cases from some parent
+language, or introduced in some other manner.&nbsp; &ldquo;Six words
+would give more,&rdquo; he says, &ldquo;than seventeen hundred to one,
+and eight near 100,000, so that in these cases the evidence would be
+little short of absolute certainty.&rdquo;&nbsp; He instances the following
+words to shew a connexion between the ancient Egyptian and the Biscayan:-</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<pre>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;BISCAYAN&nbsp; EGYPTIAN.<br /></pre><pre><i>New</i></pre><pre>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Beria&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Beri.<br /></pre><pre><i>A dog</i></pre><pre>&nbsp; &nbsp; Ora&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Whor.<br /></pre><pre><i>Little</i></pre><pre>&nbsp; &nbsp; Gutchi&nbsp; &nbsp; Kudchi.<br /></pre><pre><i>Bread</i></pre><pre>&nbsp; &nbsp; Ognia&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Oik.<br /></pre><pre><i>A wolf</i></pre><pre>&nbsp; &nbsp; Otgsa&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Ounsh.<br /></pre><pre><i>Seven</i></pre><pre>&nbsp; &nbsp; Shashpi&nbsp; &nbsp; Shashf.</pre>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines1"><br /></div>
+<p>Now, as there are, according to Humboldt, one hundred and seventy
+words in common between the languages of the new and old continents,
+and many of these are expressive of the most primitive ideas, there
+is, by Dr. Young&rsquo;s calculation, overpowering proof of the original
+connexion of the American and other human families.</p>
+<p>This completes the slight outline which I have been able to give,
+of the evidence for the various races of men being descended from one
+stock.&nbsp; It cannot be considered as conclusive, and there are many
+eminent persons who deem the opposite idea the more probable; but I
+must say that, without the least regard to any other kind of evidence,
+that which physiology and philology present seems to me decidedly favourable
+to the idea of a single origin.</p>
+<p>Assuming that the human race is <i>one</i>, we are next called upon
+to inquire in what part of the earth it may most probably be supposed
+to have originated.&nbsp; One obvious mode of approximating to a solution
+of this question is to trace backward the lines in which the principal
+tribes appear to have migrated, and to see if these converge nearly
+to a point.&nbsp; It is very remarkable that the lines do converge,
+and are concentrated about the region of Hindostan.&nbsp; The language,
+religion, modes of reckoning time, and some other peculiar ideas of
+the Americans, are now believed to refer their origin to North-Eastern
+Asia.&nbsp; Trace them farther back in the same direction, and we come
+to the north of India.&nbsp; The history of the Celts and Teutones represents
+them as coming from the east, the one after the other, successive waves
+of a tide of population flowing towards the north-west of Europe: this
+line being also traced back, rests finally at the same place.&nbsp;
+So does the line of Iranian population, which has peopled the east and
+south shores of the Mediterranean, Syria, Arabia, and Egypt.&nbsp; The
+Malay variety, again, rests its limit in one direction on the borders
+of India.&nbsp; Standing on that point, it is easy to see how the human
+family, originating there, might spread out in different directions,
+passing into varieties of aspect and of language as they spread, the
+Malay variety proceeding towards the Oceanic region, the Mongolians
+to the east and north, and sending off the red men as a sub-variety,
+the European population going off to the north-westward, and the Syrian,
+Arabian, and Egyptian, towards the countries which they are known to
+have so long occupied.&nbsp; The Negro alone is here unaccounted for;
+and of that race it may fairly be said, that it is the one most likely
+to have had an independent origin, seeing that it is a type so peculiar
+in an inveterate black colour, and so mean in development.&nbsp; But
+it is not necessary to presume such an origin for it, as much good argument
+might be employed to shew that it is only a deteriorated offshoot of
+the general stock.&nbsp; Our view of the probable original seat of man
+agrees with the ancient traditions of the race.&nbsp; There is one among
+the Hindoos which places the cradle of the human family in Thibet; another
+makes Ceylon the residence of the first man.&nbsp; Our view is also
+in harmony with the hypothesis detailed in the chapter before the last.&nbsp;
+According to that theory, we should expect man to have originated where
+the highest species of the quadrumana are to be found.&nbsp; Now these
+are unquestionably found in the Indian Archipelago.</p>
+<p>After all, it may be regarded as still an open question, whether
+mankind is of one or many origins.&nbsp; The first human generation
+may have consisted of many pairs, though situated at one place, and
+these may have been considerably different from each other in external
+characters.&nbsp; And we are equally bound to admit, though this does
+not as yet seem to have occurred to any other speculator, that there
+may have been different lines and sources of origination, geographically
+apart, but which all resulted uniformly in the production of a being,
+one in species, although variously marked.</p>
+<p>It has of late years been a favourite notion with many, that the
+human race was at first in a highly civilized state, and that barbarism
+was a second condition.&nbsp; This idea probably took its origin in
+a wish to support certain interpretations of the Mosaic record, and
+it has never yet been propounded by any writer who seemed to have a
+due sense of the value of science in this class of investigations.&nbsp;
+The principal argument for it is, that we see many examples of nations
+falling away from civilization into barbarism, while in some regions
+of the earth, the history of which we do not clearly know, there are
+remains of works of art far superior to any which the present unenlightened
+inhabitants could have produced.&nbsp; It is to be readily admitted
+that such decadences are common; but do they necessarily prove that
+there has been anything like a regular and constant decline into the
+present state, from a state more generally refined?&nbsp; May not these
+be only instances of local failures and suppressions of the principle
+of civilization, where it had begun to take root amongst a people generally
+barbarous?&nbsp; It is, at least, as legitimate to draw this inference
+from the facts which are known.&nbsp; But it is also alleged that we
+know of no such thing as civilization being ever self-originated.&nbsp;
+It is always seen to be imparted from one people to another.&nbsp; Hence,
+of course, we must infer that civilization at the first could only have
+been of supernatural origin.&nbsp; This argument appears to be founded
+on false premises, for civilization does sometimes rise in a manner
+clearly independent amongst a horde of people generally barbarous.&nbsp;
+A striking instance is described in the laborious work of Mr. Catlin
+on the North-American tribes.&nbsp; Far placed among those which inhabit
+the vast region of the north-west, and quite beyond the reach of any
+influence from the whites, he found a small tribe living in a fortified
+village, where they cultivated the arts of manufacture, realized comforts
+and luxuries, and had attained to a remarkable refinement of manners,
+insomuch as to be generally called the polite and friendly Mandans.&nbsp;
+They were also more than usually elegant in their persons, and of every
+variety of complexion between that of their compatriots and a pure white.&nbsp;
+Up to the time of Mr. Catlin&rsquo;s visit, these people had been able
+to defend themselves and their possessions against the roving bands
+which surrounded them on all sides; but, soon after, they were attacked
+by small-pox, which cut them all off except a small party, whom their
+enemies rushed in upon and destroyed to a man.&nbsp; What is this but
+a repetition on a small scale of phenomena with which ancient history
+familiarizes us - a nation rising in arts and elegances amidst barbarous
+neighbours, but at length overpowered by the rude majority, leaving
+only a Tadmor or a Luxor as a monument of itself to beautify the waste?&nbsp;
+What can we suppose the nation which built Palenque and Copan to have
+been but only a Mandan tribe, which chanced to have made its way farther
+along the path of civilization and the arts, before the barbarians broke
+in upon it?&nbsp; The flame essayed to rise in many parts of the earth;
+but there were always considerable chances against it, and down it accordingly
+went, times without number; but there was always a vitality in it, nevertheless,
+and a tendency to progress, and at length it seems to have attained
+a strength against which the powers of barbarism can never more prevail.&nbsp;
+The state of our knowledge of uncivilized nations is very apt to make
+us fall into error on this subject.&nbsp; They are generally supposed
+to be all at one point in barbarism, which is far from being the case,
+for in the midst of every great region of uncivilized men, such as North
+America, there are nations partially refined.&nbsp; The Jolofs, Mandingoes,
+and Kafirs, are African examples, where a natural and independent origin
+for the improvement which exists is as unavoidably to be presumed as
+in the case of the Mandans.</p>
+<p>The most conclusive argument against the original civilization of
+mankind is to be found in the fact that we do not now see civilization
+existing anywhere except in certain conditions altogether different
+from any we can suppose&rsquo; to have existed at the commencement of
+our race.&nbsp; To have civilization, it is necessary that a people
+should be numerous and closely placed; that they should be fixed in
+their habitations, and safe from violent external and internal disturbance;
+that a considerable number of them should be exempt from the necessity
+of drudging for immediate subsistence.&nbsp; Feeling themselves at ease
+about the first necessities of their nature, including self-preservation,
+and daily subjected to that intellectual excitement which society produces,
+men begin to manifest what is called civilization; but never in rude
+and shelterless circumstances, or when widely scattered.&nbsp; Even
+men who have been civilized, when transferred to a wide wilderness,
+where each has to work hard and isolatedly for the first requisites
+of life, soon shew a retrogression to barbarism: witness the plains
+of Australia, as well as the backwoods of Canada and the prairies of
+Texas.&nbsp; Fixity of residence and thickening of population are perhaps
+the prime requisites for civilization, and hence it will be found that
+all civilizations as yet known have taken place in regions physically
+limited.&nbsp; That of Egypt arose in a narrow valley hemmed in by deserts
+on both sides.&nbsp; That of Greece took its rise in a small peninsula
+bounded on the only land side by mountains.&nbsp; Etruria and Rome were
+naturally limited regions.&nbsp; Civilizations have taken place at both
+the eastern and western extremities of the elder continent - China and
+Japan, on the one hand; Germany, Holland, Britain, France, on the other
+- while the great unmarked tract between contains nations decidedly
+less advanced.&nbsp; Why is this, but because the sea, in both cases,
+has imposed limits to further migration, and caused the population to
+settle and condense - the conditions most necessary for social improvement.
+<a name="citation302"></a><a href="#footnote302">{302}</a>&nbsp; Even
+the simple case of the Mandans affords an illustration of this principle,
+for Mr. Catlin expressly, though without the least regard to theory,
+attributes their improvement to the fact of their being a small tribe,
+obliged, by fear of their more numerous enemies, to <i>settle in a permanent
+village</i>, so fortified as to ensure their preservation.&nbsp; &ldquo;By
+this means,&rdquo; says he, &ldquo;they have advanced farther in the
+arts of manufacture, and have supplied their lodges more abundantly
+with the comforts and even luxuries of life than any Indian nation I
+know of.&nbsp; The consequence of this,&rdquo; he adds, &ldquo;is that
+the tribe have taken many steps ahead of other tribes in <i>manners
+and refinements</i>.&rdquo;&nbsp; These conditions can only be regarded
+as natural laws affecting civilization, and it might not be difficult,
+taking them into account, to predict of any newly settled country its
+social destiny.&nbsp; An island like Van Dieman&rsquo;s land might fairly
+be expected to go on more rapidly to good manners and sound institutions
+than a wide region like Australia.&nbsp; The United States might be
+expected to make no great way in civilization till they be fully peopled
+to the Pacific; and it might not be unreasonable to expect that, when
+that even has occurred, the greatest civilizations of that vast territory
+will be found in the peninsula of California and the narrow stripe of
+country beyond the Rocky Mountains.&nbsp; This, however, is a digression.&nbsp;
+To return: it is also necessary for a civilization that at least a portion
+of the community should be placed above mean and engrossing toils.&nbsp;
+Man&rsquo;s mind becomes subdued, like the dyer&rsquo;s hand, to that
+it works in.&nbsp; In rude and difficult circumstances we unavoidably
+become rude, because then only the inferior and harsher faculties of
+our nature are called into existence.&nbsp; When, on the contrary, there
+is leisure and abundance, the self-seeking and self-preserving instincts
+are allowed to rest, the gentler and more generous sentiments are evoked,
+and man becomes that courteous and chivalric being which he is found
+to be amongst the upper classes of almost all civilized countries.&nbsp;
+These, then, may be said to be the chief natural laws concerned in the
+moral phenomenon of civilization.&nbsp; If I am right in so considering
+them, it will of course be readily admitted that the earliest families
+of the human race, although they might be simple and innocent, could
+not have been in anything like a civilized state, seeing that the conditions
+necessary for that state could not have then existed.&nbsp; Let us only
+for a moment consider some of the things requisite for their being civilized,
+- namely, a set of elegant homes ready furnished for their reception,
+fields ready cultivated to yield them food without labour, stores of
+luxurious appliances of all kinds, a complete social enginery for the
+securing of life and property, - and we shall turn from the whole conceit
+as one worthy only of the philosophers of Utopia.</p>
+<p>Yet, as has been remarked, the earliest families might be simple
+and innocent, while at the same time unskilled and ignorant, and obliged
+to live merely upon such substances as they could readily procure.&nbsp;
+The traditions of all nations refer to such a state as that in which
+mankind were at first: perhaps it is not so much a tradition as an idea
+which the human mind naturally inclines to form respecting the fathers
+of the race; but nothing that we see of mankind absolutely forbids our
+entertaining this idea, while there are some considerations rather favourable
+to it.&nbsp; A few families, in a state of nature, living near each
+other, in a country supplying the means of livelihood abundantly, are
+generally simple and innocent; their instinctive and perceptive faculties
+are also apt to be very active, although the higher intellect may be
+dormant.&nbsp; If we therefore presume India to have been the cradle
+of our race, they might at first exemplify a sort of golden age; but
+it could not be of long continuance.&nbsp; The very first movements
+from the primal seat would be attended with degradation, nor could there
+be any tendency to true civilization till groups had settled and thickened
+in particular seats physically limited.</p>
+<p>The probability may now be assumed that the human race sprung from
+one stock, which was at first in a state of simplicity, if not barbarism.&nbsp;
+As yet we have not seen very distinctly how the various branches of
+the family, as they parted off, and took up separate ground, became
+marked by external features so peculiar.&nbsp; Why are the Africans
+black, and generally marked by coarse features and ungainly forms?&nbsp;
+Why are the Mongolians generally yellow, the Americans red, the Caucasians
+white?&nbsp; Why the flat features of the Chinese, the small stature
+of the Laps, the soft round forms of the English, the lank features
+of their descendants, the Americans?&nbsp; All of these phenomena appear,
+in a word, to be explicable on the ground of <i>development</i>.&nbsp;
+We have already seen that various leading animal forms represent stages
+in the embryotic progress of the highest - the human being.&nbsp; Our
+brain goes through the various stages of a fish&rsquo;s, a reptile&rsquo;s,
+and a mammifer&rsquo;s brain, and finally becomes human.&nbsp; There
+is more than this, for, after completing the animal transformations,
+it passes through the characters in which it appears, in the Negro,
+Malay, American, and Mongolian nations, and finally is Caucasian.&nbsp;
+The face partakes of these alterations.&nbsp; &ldquo;One of the earliest
+points in which ossification commences is the lower jaw.&nbsp; This
+bone is consequently sooner completed than the other bones of the head,
+and acquires a predominance, which, as is well known, it never loses
+in the Negro.&nbsp; During the soft pliant state of the bones of the
+skull, the oblong form which they naturally assume, approaches nearly
+the permanent shape of the Americans.&nbsp; At birth, the flattened
+face, and broad smooth forehead of the infant, the position of the eyes
+rather towards the side of the head, and the widened space between,
+represent the Mongolian form; while it is only as the child advances
+to maturity, that the oval face, the arched forehead, and the marked
+features of the true Caucasian, become perfectly developed.&rdquo; <a name="citation307a"></a><a href="#footnote307a">{307a}</a>&nbsp;
+<i>The leading characters</i>, <i>in short</i>, <i>of the various races
+of mankind</i>, <i>are simply representations of particular stages in
+the development of the highest or Caucasian type</i>.&nbsp; The Negro
+exhibits permanently the imperfect brain, projecting lower jaw, and
+slender bent limbs, of a Caucasian child, some considerable time before
+the period of its birth.&nbsp; The aboriginal American represents the
+same child nearer birth.&nbsp; The Mongolian is an arrested infant newly
+born.&nbsp; And so forth.&nbsp; All this is as respects form; <a name="citation307b"></a><a href="#footnote307b">{307b}</a>
+but whence colour?&nbsp; This might be supposed to have depended on
+climatal agencies only; but it has been shewn by overpowering evidence
+to be independent of these.&nbsp; In further considering the matter,
+we are met by the very remarkable fact that colour is deepest in the
+least perfectly developed type, next in the Malay, next in the American,
+next in the Mongolian, the very order in which the degrees of development
+are ranged.&nbsp; <i>May not colour</i>, <i>then</i>, <i>depend upon
+development also</i>?&nbsp; We do not, indeed, see that a Caucasian
+f&oelig;tus at the stage which the African represents is anything like
+black; neither is a Caucasian child yellow, like the Mongolian.&nbsp;
+There may, nevertheless, be a character of skin at a certain stage of
+development which is predisposed to a particular colour when it is presented
+as the envelope of a mature being.&nbsp; Development being arrested
+at so immature a stage in the case of the Negro, the skin may take on
+the colour as an unavoidable consequence of its imperfect organization.&nbsp;
+It is favourable to this view, that Negro infants are not deeply black
+at first, but only acquire the full colour tint after exposure for some
+time to the atmosphere.&nbsp; Another consideration in its favour is
+that there is a likelihood of peculiarities of form and colour, since
+they are so coincident, depending on one set of phenomena.&nbsp; If
+it be admitted as true, there can be no difficulty in accounting for
+all the varieties of mankind.&nbsp; They are simply the result of so
+many advances and retrogressions in the developing power of the human
+mothers, these advances and retrogressions being, as we have formerly
+seen, the immediate effect of external conditions in nutrition, hardship,
+&amp;c., <a name="citation309"></a><a href="#footnote309">{309}</a>
+and also, perhaps, to some extent, of the suitableness and unsuitableness
+of marriages, for it is found that parents too nearly related tend to
+produce offspring of the Mongolian type, - that is, persons who in maturity
+still are a kind of children.&nbsp; According to this view, the greater
+part of the human race must be considered as having lapsed or declined
+from the original type.&nbsp; In the Caucasian or Indo-European family
+alone has the primitive organization been improved upon.&nbsp; The Mongolian,
+Malay, American, and Negro, comprehending perhaps five-sixths of mankind,
+are degenerate.&nbsp; Strange that the great plan should admit of failures
+and aberrations of such portentous magnitude!&nbsp; But pause and reflect;
+take time into consideration: the past history of mankind may be, to
+what is to come, but as a day.&nbsp; Look at the progress even now making
+over the barbaric parts of the earth by the best examples of the Caucasian
+type, promising not only to fill up the waste places, but to supersede
+the imperfect nations already existing.&nbsp; Who can tell what progress
+may be made, even in a single century, towards reversing the proportions
+of the perfect and imperfect types? and who can tell but that the time
+during which the mean types have lasted, long as it appears, may yet
+be thrown entirely into the shade by the time during which the best
+types will remain predominant?</p>
+<p>We have seen that the traces of a common origin in all languages
+afford a ground of presumption for the unity of the human race.&nbsp;
+They establish a still stronger probability that mankind had not yet
+begun to disperse before they were possessed of a means of communicating
+their ideas by conventional sounds - in short, speech.&nbsp; This is
+a gift so peculiar to man, and in itself so remarkable, that there is
+a great inclination to surmise a miraculous origin for it, although
+there is no proper ground, or even support, for such an idea in Scripture,
+while it is clearly opposed to everything else that we know with regard
+to the providential arrangements for the creation of our race.&nbsp;
+Here, as in many other cases, a little observation of nature might have
+saved much vain discussion.&nbsp; The real character of language itself
+has not been thoroughly understood.&nbsp; Language, in its most comprehensive
+sense, is the communication of ideas by whatever means.&nbsp; Ideas
+can be communicated by looks, gestures, and signs of various other kinds,
+as well as by speech.&nbsp; The inferior animals possess some of those
+means of communicating ideas, and they have likewise a silent and unobservable
+mode of their own, the nature of which is a complete mystery to us,
+though we are assured of its reality by its effects.&nbsp; Now, as the
+inferior animals were all in being before man, there was language upon
+earth long ere the history of our race commenced.&nbsp; The only additional
+fact in the history of language, which was produced by our creation,
+was the rise of a new mode of expression - namely, that by <i>sound-signs</i>
+produced by the vocal organs.&nbsp; In other words, speech was the only
+novelty in this respect attending the creation of the human race.&nbsp;
+No doubt it was an addition of great importance, for, in comparison
+with it, the other natural modes of communicating ideas sink into insignificance.&nbsp;
+Still, the main and fundamental phenomenon, language, as the communication
+of ideas, was no new gift of the Creator to man; and in speech itself,
+when we judge of it as a natural fact, we see only a result of some
+of those superior endowments of which so many others have fallen to
+our lot through the medium of an improved or advanced organization.</p>
+<p>The first and most obvious natural endowment concerned in speech
+is that peculiar organization of the larynx, trachea, and mouth, which
+enables us to produce the various sounds required in the case.&nbsp;
+Man started at first with this organization ready for use, a constitution
+of the atmosphere adapted for the sounds which that organization was
+calculated to produce, and, lastly, but not leastly, as will afterwards
+be more particularly shewn, a mental power within, prompting to, and
+giving directions for, the expression of ideas.&nbsp; Such an arrangement
+of mutually adapted things was as likely to produce sounds as an Eolian
+harp placed in a draught is to produce tones.&nbsp; It was unavoidable
+that human beings so organized, and in such a relation to external nature,
+should utter sounds, and also come to attach to these conventional meanings,
+thus forming the elements of spoken language.&nbsp; The great difficulty
+which has been felt was to account for man going in this respect beyond
+the inferior animals.&nbsp; There could have been no such difficulty
+if speculators in this class of subjects had looked into physiology
+for an account of the superior vocal organization of man, and had they
+possessed a true science of mind to shew man possessing a faculty for
+the expression of ideas which is only rudimental in the lower animals.&nbsp;
+Another difficulty has been in the consideration that, if men were at
+first utterly untutored and barbarous, they could scarcely be in a condition
+to form or employ language - an instrument which it requires the fullest
+powers of thought to analyse and speculate upon.&nbsp; But this difficulty
+also vanishes upon reflection - for, in the first place, we are not
+bound to suppose the fathers of our race early attaining to great proficiency
+in language, and, in the second, language itself seems to be amongst
+the things least difficult to be acquired, if we can form any judgment
+from what we see in children, most of whom have, by three years of age,
+while their information and judgment are still as nothing, mastered
+and familiarized themselves with a quantity of words, infinitely exceeding
+in proportion what they acquire in the course of any subsequent similar
+portion of time.</p>
+<p>Discussions as to which parts of speech were first formed, and the
+processes by which grammatical structure and inflections took their
+rise, appear in a great measure needless, after the matter has been
+placed in this light.&nbsp; The mental powers could readily connect
+particular arbitrary sounds with particular ideas, whether those ideas
+were nouns, verbs, or interjections.&nbsp; As the words of all languages
+can be traced back into roots which are monosyllables, we may presume
+these sounds to have all been monosyllabic accordingly.&nbsp; The clustering
+of two or more together to express a compound idea, and the formation
+of inflections by additional syllables expressive of pronouns and such
+prepositions as of, by, and to, are processes which would or might occur
+as matters of course, being simple results of a mental power called
+into action, and partly directed, by external necessities.&nbsp; This
+power, however, as we find it in very different degrees of endowment
+in individuals, so would it be in different degrees of endowment in
+nations, or branches of the human family.&nbsp; Hence we find the formation
+of words and the process of their composition and grammatical arrangement,
+in very different stages of development in different races.&nbsp; The
+Chinese have a language composed of a limited number of monosyllables,
+which they multiply in use by mere variations of accent, and which they
+have never yet attained the power of clustering or inflecting; the language
+of this immense nation - the third part of the human race - may be said
+to be in the condition of infancy.&nbsp; The aboriginal Americans, so
+inferior in civilization, have, on the other hand, a language of the
+most elaborately composite kind, perhaps even exceeding, in this respect,
+the languages of the most refined European nations.&nbsp; These are
+but a few out of many facts tending to shew that language is in a great
+measure independent of civilization, as far as its advance and development
+are concerned.&nbsp; Do they not also help to prove that cultivated
+intellect is not necessary for the origination of language?</p>
+<p>Facts daily presented to our observation afford equally simple reasons
+for the almost infinite diversification of language.&nbsp; It is invariably
+found that, wherever society is at once dense and refined, language
+tends to be uniform throughout the whole population, and to undergo
+few changes in the course of time.&nbsp; Wherever, on the contrary,
+we have a scattered and barbarous people, we have great diversities,
+and comparatively rapid alterations of language.&nbsp; Insomuch that,
+while English, French, and German are each spoken with little variation
+by many millions, there are islands in the Indian archipelago, probably
+not inhabited by one million, but in which there are hundreds of languages,
+as diverse as are English, French, and German.&nbsp; It is easy to see
+how this should be.&nbsp; There are peculiarities in the vocal organization
+of every person, tending to produce peculiarities of pronunciation;
+for example, it has been stated that each child in a family of six gave
+the monosyllable, fly, in a different manner, (eye, fy, ly, &amp;c.)
+until, when the organs were more advanced, correct example induced the
+proper pronunciation of this and similar words.&nbsp; Such departures
+from orthoepy are only to be checked by the power of such example; but
+this is a power not always present, or not always of sufficient strength.&nbsp;
+The able and self-devoted Robert Moffat, in his work on South Africa,
+states, without the least regard to hypothesis, that amongst the people
+of the towns of that great region, &ldquo;the purity and harmony of
+language is kept up by their pitchos or public meetings, by their festivals
+and ceremonies, as well as by their songs and their constant intercourse.&nbsp;
+With the isolated villages of the desert it is far otherwise.&nbsp;
+They have no such meetings; they are compelled to traverse the wilds,
+often to a great distance from their native village.&nbsp; On such occasions,
+fathers and mothers, and all who can bear a burden, often set out for
+weeks at a time, and leave their children to the care of two or three
+infirm old people.&nbsp; The infant progeny, some of whom are beginning
+to lisp, while others can just master a whole sentence, and those still
+farther advanced, romping and playing together, the children of nature,
+through the live-long day, <i>become habituated to a language of their
+own</i>.&nbsp; The more voluble condescend to the less precocious, and
+thus, from this infant Babel, proceeds a dialect composed of a host
+of mongrel words and phrases, joined together without rule, and <i>in
+the course of a generation the entire character of the language is changed</i>.&rdquo;
+<a name="citation317"></a><a href="#footnote317">{317}</a>&nbsp; I have
+been told, that in like manner the children of the Manchester factory
+workers, left for a great part of the day, in large assemblages, under
+the care of perhaps a single elderly person, and spending the time in
+amusements, are found to make a great deal of new language.&nbsp; I
+have seen children in other circumstances amuse themselves by concocting
+and throwing into the family circulation entirely new words; and I believe
+I am running little risk of contradiction when I say that there is scarcely
+a family, even amongst the middle classes of this country, who have
+not some peculiarities of pronunciation and syntax, which have originated
+amongst themselves, it is hardly possible to say how.&nbsp; All these
+things being considered, it is easy to understand how mankind have come
+at length to possess between three and four thousand languages, all
+different at least as much as French, German, and English, though, as
+has been shewn, the traces of a common origin are observable in them
+all.</p>
+<p>What has been said on the question whether mankind were originally
+barbarous or civilized, will have prepared the reader for understanding
+how the arts and sciences, and the rudiments of civilization itself,
+took their rise amongst men.&nbsp; The only source of fallacious views
+on this subject is the so frequent observation of arts, sciences, and
+social modes, forms, and ideas, being not indigenous where we see them
+now flourishing, but known to have been derived elsewhere: thus Rome
+borrowed from Greece, Greece from Egypt, and Egypt itself, lost in the
+mists of historic antiquity, is now supposed to have obtained the light
+of knowledge from some still earlier scene of intellectual culture.&nbsp;
+This has caused to many a great difficulty in supposing a natural or
+spontaneous origin for civilization and the attendant arts.&nbsp; But,
+in the first place, several stages of derivation are no conclusive argument
+against there having been an originality at some earlier stage.&nbsp;
+In the second, such observers have not looked far enough, for, if they
+had, they could have seen various instances of civilizations which it
+is impossible, with any plausibility, to trace back to a common origin
+with others; such are those of China and America.&nbsp; They would also
+have seen civilization springing up, as it were, like oases amongst
+the arid plains of barbarism, as in the case of the Mandans.&nbsp; A
+still more attentive study of the subject would have shewn, amongst
+living men, the very psychological procedure on which the origination
+of civilization and the arts and sciences depended.</p>
+<p>These things, like language, are simply the effects of the spontaneous
+working of certain mental faculties, each in relation to the things
+of the external world on which it was intended by creative Providence
+to be exercised.&nbsp; The monkeys themselves, without instruction from
+any quarter, learn to use sticks in fighting, and some build houses
+- an act which cannot in their case be considered as one of instinct,
+but of intelligence.&nbsp; Such being the case, there is no necessary
+difficulty in supposing how man, with his superior mental organization,
+(a brain five times heavier,) was able, in his primitive state, without
+instruction, to turn many things in nature to his use, and commence,
+in short, the circle of the domestic arts.&nbsp; He appears, in the
+most unfavourable circumstances, to be able to provide himself with
+some sort of dwelling, to make weapons, and to practise some simple
+kind of cookery.&nbsp; But, granting, it will be said, that he can go
+thus far, how does he ever proceed farther unprompted, seeing that many
+nations remain fixed for ever at this point, and seem unable to take
+one step in advance?&nbsp; It is perfectly true that there is such a
+fixation in many nations; but, on the other hand, all nations are not
+alike in mental organization, and another point has been established,
+that only when some favourable circumstances have settled a people in
+one place, do arts and social arrangements get leave to flourish.&nbsp;
+If we were to limit our view to humbly endowed nations, or the common
+class of minds in those called civilized, we should see absolutely no
+conceivable power for the origination of new ideas and devices.&nbsp;
+But let us look at the inventive class of minds which stand out amongst
+their fellows - the men who, with little prompting or none, conceive
+new ideas in science, arts, morals - and we can be at no loss to understand
+how and whence have arisen the elements of that civilization which history
+traces from country to country throughout the course of centuries.&nbsp;
+See a Pascal, reproducing the Alexandrian&rsquo;s problems at fifteen;
+a Ferguson, making clocks from the suggestions of his own brain, while
+tending cattle on a Morayshire heath; a boy Lawrence, in an inn on the
+Bath road, producing, without a master, drawings which the educated
+could not but admire; or look at Solon and Confucius, devising sage
+laws, and breathing the accents of all but divine wisdom, for their
+barbarous fellow-countrymen, three thousand years ago - and the whole
+mystery is solved at once.&nbsp; Amongst the arrangements of Providence
+is one for the production of original, inventive, and aspiring minds,
+which, when circumstances are not decidedly unfavourable, strike out
+new ideas for the benefit of their fellow-creatures, or put upon them
+a lasting impress of their own superior sentiments.&nbsp; Nations, improved
+by these means, become in turn <i>foci</i> for the diffusion of light
+over the adjacent regions of barbarism - their very passions helping
+to this end, for nothing can be more clear than that ambitious aggression
+has led to the civilization of many countries.&nbsp; Such is the process
+which seems to form the destined means for bringing mankind from the
+darkness of barbarism to the day of knowledge and mechanical and social
+improvement.&nbsp; Even the noble art of letters is but, as Dr. Adam
+Fergusson has remarked, &ldquo;a natural produce of the human mind,
+which will rise spontaneously, wherever men are happily placed;&rdquo;
+original alike amongst the ancient Egyptians and the dimly monumented
+Toltecans of Yucatan.&nbsp; &ldquo;Banish,&rdquo; says Dr. Gall, &ldquo;music,
+poetry, painting, sculpture, architecture, all the arts and sciences,
+and let your Homers, Raphaels, Michael Angelos, Glucks, and Canovas,
+be forgotten, yet let men of genius of every description spring up,
+and poetry, music, painting, architecture, sculpture, and all the arts
+and sciences will again shine out in all their glory.&nbsp; Twice within
+the records of history has the human race traversed the great circle
+of its entire destiny, and twice has the rudeness of barbarism been
+followed by a higher degree of refinement.&nbsp; It is a great mistake
+to suppose one people to have proceeded from another on account of their
+conformity of manners, customs, and arts.&nbsp; The swallow of Paris
+builds its nest like the swallow of Vienna, but does it thence follow
+that the former sprung from the latter?&nbsp; With the same causes we
+have the same effects; with the same organization we have the manifestation
+of the same powers.&rdquo;</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>MENTAL CONSTITUTION OF ANIMALS.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>It has been one of the most agreeable tasks of modern science to
+trace the wonderfully exact adaptations of the organization of animals
+to the physical circumstances amidst which they are destined to live.&nbsp;
+From the mandibles of insects to the hand of man, all is seen to be
+in the most harmonious relation to the things of the outward world,
+thus clearly proving that <i>design</i> presided in the creation of
+the whole - design again implying a designer, another word for a CREATOR.</p>
+<p>It would be tiresome to present in this place even a selection of
+the proofs which have been adduced on this point.&nbsp; The Natural
+Theology of Paley, and the Bridgewater Treatises, place the subject
+in so clear a light, that the general postulate may be taken for granted.&nbsp;
+The physical constitution of animals is, then, to be regarded as in
+the nicest congruity and adaptation to the external world.</p>
+<p>Less clear ideas have hitherto been entertained on the mental constitution
+of animals.&nbsp; The very nature of this constitution is not as yet
+generally known or held as ascertained.&nbsp; There is, indeed, a notion
+of old standing, that the mind is in some way connected with the brain;
+but the metaphysicians insist that it is, in reality, known only by
+its acts or effects, and they accordingly present the subject in a form
+which is unlike any other kind of science, for it does not so much as
+pretend to have nature for its basis.&nbsp; There is a general disinclination
+to regard mind in connexion with organization, from a fear that this
+must needs interfere with the cherished religious doctrine of the spirit
+of man, and lower him to the level of the brutes.&nbsp; A distinction
+is therefore drawn between our mental manifestations and those of the
+lower animals, the latter being comprehended under the term instinct,
+while ours are collectively described as mind, mind being again a received
+synonyme with soul, the immortal part of man.&nbsp; There is here a
+strange system of confusion and error, which it is most imprudent to
+regard as essential to religion, since candid investigations of nature
+tend to shew its untenableness.&nbsp; There is, in reality, nothing
+to prevent our regarding man as specially endowed with an immortal spirit,
+at the same time that his ordinary mental manifestations are looked
+upon as simple phenomena resulting from organization, those of the lower
+animals being phenomena absolutely the same in character, though developed
+within much narrower limits. <a name="citation326"></a><a href="#footnote326">{326}</a></p>
+<p>What has chiefly tended to take mind, in the eyes of learned and
+unlearned, out of the range of nature, is its apparently irregular and
+wayward character.&nbsp; How different the manifestations in different
+beings! how unstable in all! - at one time so calm, at another so wild
+and impulsive!&nbsp; It seemed impossible that anything so subtle and
+aberrant could be part of a system, the main features of which are regularity
+and precision.&nbsp; But the irregularity of mental phenomena is only
+in appearance.&nbsp; When we give up the individual, and take the mass,
+we find as much uniformity of result as in any other class of natural
+phenomena.&nbsp; The irregularity is exactly of the same kind as that
+of the weather.&nbsp; No man can say what may be the weather of to-morrow;
+but the quantity of rain which falls in any particular place in any
+five years, is precisely the same as the quantity which falls in any
+other five years at the same place.&nbsp; Thus, while it is absolutely
+impossible to predict of any one Frenchman that during next year he
+will commit a crime, it is quite certain that about one in every six
+hundred and fifty of the French people will do so, because in past years
+the proportion has generally been about that amount, the tendencies
+to crime in relation to the temptations being everywhere invariable
+over a sufficiently wide range of time.&nbsp; So also, the number of
+persons taken in charge by the police in London for being drunk and
+disorderly on the streets, is, week by week, a nearly uniform quantity,
+shewing that the inclination to drink to excess is always in the mass
+about the same, regard being had to the existing temptations or stimulations
+to this vice.&nbsp; Even mistakes and oversights are of regular recurrence,
+for it is found in the post-offices of large cities, that the number
+of letters put in without addresses is year by year the same.&nbsp;
+Statistics has made out an equally distinct regularity in a wide range,
+with regard to many other things concerning the mind, and the doctrine
+founded upon it has lately produced a scheme which may well strike the
+ignorant with surprise.&nbsp; It was proposed to establish in London
+a society for ensuring the integrity of clerks, secretaries, collectors,
+and all such functionaries as are usually obliged to find security for
+money passing through their hands in the course of business.&nbsp; A
+gentleman of the highest character as an actuary spoke of the plan in
+the following terms:- &ldquo;If a thousand bankers&rsquo; clerks were
+to club together to indemnify their securities, by the payment of one
+pound a year each, and if each had given security for 500<i>l</i>.,
+it is obvious that two in each year might become defaulters to that
+amount, four to half the amount, and so on, without rendering the guarantee
+fund insolvent.&nbsp; If it be tolerably well ascertained that the instances
+of dishonesty (yearly) among such persons amount to one in five hundred,
+this club would continue to exist, subject to being in debt in a bad
+year, to an amount which it would be able to discharge in good ones.&nbsp;
+The only question necessary to be asked previous to the formation of
+such a club would be, - may it not be feared that the motive to resist
+dishonesty would be lessened by the existence of the club, or that ready-made
+rogues, by belonging to it, might find the means of obtaining situations
+which they would otherwise have been kept out of by the impossibility
+of obtaining security among those who know them?&nbsp; Suppose this
+be sufficiently answered by saying, that none but those who could bring
+satisfactory testimony to their previous good character should be allowed
+to join the club; that persons who may now hope that a deficiency on
+their parts will be made up and hushed up by the relative or friend
+who is security, will know very well that the club will have no motive
+to decline a prosecution, or to keep the secret, and so on.&nbsp; It
+then only remains to ask, whether the sum demanded for the guarantee
+is sufficient?&rdquo; <a name="citation331"></a><a href="#footnote331">{331}</a>&nbsp;
+The philosophical principle on which the scheme proceeds, seems to be
+simply this, that, amongst a given (large) number of persons of good
+character, there will be, within a year or other considerable space
+of time, a determinate number of instances in which moral principle
+and the terror of the consequences of guilt will be overcome by temptations
+of a determinate kind and amount, and thus occasion a certain periodical
+amount of loss which the association must make up.</p>
+<p>This statistical regularity in moral affairs fully establishes their
+being under the presidency of law.&nbsp; Man is now seen to be an enigma
+only as an individual; in the mass he is a mathematical problem.&nbsp;
+It is hardly necessary to say, much less to argue, that mental action,
+being proved to be under law, passes at once into the category of natural
+things.&nbsp; Its old metaphysical character vanishes in a moment, and
+the distinction usually taken between physical and moral is annulled,
+as only an error in terms.&nbsp; This view agrees with what all observation
+teaches, that mental phenomena flow directly from the brain.&nbsp; They
+are seen to be dependent on naturally constituted and naturally conditioned
+organs, and thus obedient, like all other organic phenomena, to law.&nbsp;
+And how wondrous must the constitution of this apparatus be, which gives
+us consciousness of thought and of affection, which makes us familiar
+with the numberless things of earth, and enables us to rise in conception
+and communion to the councils of God himself!&nbsp; It is matter which
+forms the medium or instrument - a little mass which, decomposed, is
+but so much common dust; yet in its living constitution, designed, formed,
+and sustained by Almighty Wisdom, how admirable its character! how reflective
+of the unutterable depths of that Power by which it was so formed, and
+is so sustained!</p>
+<p>In the mundane economy, mental action takes its place as a means
+of providing for the independent existence and the various relations
+of animals, each species being furnished according to its special necessities
+and the demands of its various relations.&nbsp; The nervous system -
+the more comprehensive term for its organic apparatus - is variously
+developed in different classes and species, and also in different individuals,
+the volume or mass bearing a general relation to the amount of power.&nbsp;
+In the mollusca and crustacea we see simply a ganglionic cord pervading
+the extent of the body, and sending out lateral filaments.&nbsp; In
+the vertebrata, we find a brain with a spinal cord, and branching lines
+of nervous tissue. <a name="citation333"></a><a href="#footnote333">{333}</a>&nbsp;
+But here, as in the general structure of animals, the great principle
+of unity is observed.&nbsp; The brain of the vertebrata is merely an
+expansion of one of the ganglions of the nervous cord of the mollusca
+and crustacea.&nbsp; Or the corresponding ganglion of the mollusca and
+crustacea may be regarded as the rudiment of a brain; the superior organ
+thus appearing as only a farther development of the inferior.&nbsp;
+There are many facts which tend to prove that the action of this apparatus
+is of an electric nature, a modification of that surprising agent, which
+takes magnetism, heat, and light, as other subordinate forms, and of
+whose general scope in this great system of things we are only beginning
+to have a right conception.&nbsp; It has been found that simple electricity,
+artificially produced, and sent along the nerves of a dead body, excites
+muscular action.&nbsp; The brain of a newly-killed animal being taken
+out, and replaced by a substance which produces electric action, the
+operation of digestion, which had been interrupted by the death of the
+animal, was resumed, shewing the absolute identity of the brain with
+a galvanic battery.&nbsp; Nor is this a very startling idea, when we
+reflect that electricity is almost as metaphysical as ever mind was
+supposed to be.&nbsp; It is a thing perfectly intangible, weightless.&nbsp;
+Metal may be magnetized, or heated to seven hundred of Fahrenheit, without
+becoming the hundredth part of a grain heavier.&nbsp; And yet electricity
+is a real thing, an actual existence in nature, as witness the effects
+of heat and light in vegetation - the power of the galvanic current
+to re-assemble the particles of copper from a solution, and make them
+again into a solid plate - the rending force of the thunderbolt as it
+strikes the oak; see also how both heat and light observe the angle
+of incidence in reflection, as exactly as does the grossest stone thrown
+obliquely against a wall.&nbsp; So mental action may be imponderable,
+intangible, and yet a real existence, and ruled by the Eternal through
+his laws. <a name="citation335"></a><a href="#footnote335">{335}</a></p>
+<p>Common observation shews a great general superiority of the human
+mind over that of the inferior animals.&nbsp; Man&rsquo;s mind is almost
+infinite in device; it ranges over all the world; it forms the most
+wonderful combinations; it seeks back into the past, and stretches forward
+into the future; while the animals generally appear to have a narrow
+range of thought and action.&nbsp; But so also has an infant but a limited
+range, and yet it is mind which works there, as well as in the most
+accomplished adults.&nbsp; The difference between mind in the lower
+animals and in man is a difference in degree only; it is not a specific
+difference.&nbsp; All who have studied animals by actual observation,
+and even those who have given a candid attention to the subject in books,
+must attain more or less clear convictions of this truth, notwithstanding
+all the obscurity which prejudice may have engendered.&nbsp; We see
+animals capable of affection, jealousy, envy; we see them quarrel, and
+conduct quarrels, in the very manner pursued by the more impulsive of
+our own race.&nbsp; We see them liable to flattery, inflated with pride,
+and dejected by shame.&nbsp; We see them as tender to their young as
+human parents are, and as faithful to a trust as the most conscientious
+of human servants.&nbsp; The horse is startled by marvellous objects,
+as a man is.&nbsp; The dog and many others shew tenacious memory.&nbsp;
+The dog also proves himself possessed of imagination, by the act of
+dreaming.&nbsp; Horses, finding themselves in want of a shoe, have of
+their own accord gone to a farrier&rsquo;s shop where they were shod
+before.&nbsp; Cats, closed up in rooms, will endeavour to obtain their
+liberation by pulling a latch or ringing a bell.&nbsp; It has several
+times been observed that in a field of cattle, when one or two were
+mischievous, and persisted long in annoying or tyrannizing over the
+rest, the herd, to all appearance, consulted, and then, making a united
+effort, drove the troublers off the ground.&nbsp; The members of a rookery
+have also been observed to take turns in supplying the needs of a family
+reduced to orphanhood.&nbsp; All of these are acts of reason, in no
+respect different from similar acts of men.&nbsp; Moreover, although
+there is no heritage of accumulated knowledge amongst the lower animals,
+as there is amongst us, they are in some degree susceptible of those
+modifications of natural character, and capable of those accomplishments,
+which we call education.&nbsp; The taming and domestication of animals,
+and the changes thus produced upon their nature in the course of generations,
+are results identical with civilization amongst ourselves; and the quiet,
+servile steer is probably as unlike the original wild cattle of this
+country, as the English gentleman of the present day is unlike the rude
+baron of the age of King John.&nbsp; Between a young, unbroken horse,
+and a trained one, there is, again, all the difference which exists
+between a wild youth reared at his own discretion in the country, and
+the same person when he has been toned down by long exposure to the
+influences of refined society.&nbsp; On the accomplishments acquired
+by animals it were superfluous to enter at any length; but I may advert
+to the dogs of M. Leonard, as remarkable examples of what the animal
+intellect may be trained to.&nbsp; When four pieces of card are laid
+down before them, each having a number pronounced <i>once</i> in connexion
+with it, they will, after a re-arrangement of the pieces, select any
+one named by its number.&nbsp; They also play at dominoes, and with
+so much skill as to triumph over biped opponents, whining if the adversary
+place a wrong piece, or if they themselves be deficient in a right one.&nbsp;
+Of extensive combinations of thought we have no reason to believe that
+any animal is capable - and yet most of us must feel the force of Walter
+Scott&rsquo;s remark, that there was scarcely anything which he would
+not believe of a dog.&nbsp; There is a curious result of education in
+certain animals, namely, that habits to which they have been trained
+in some instances become hereditary.&nbsp; For example, the accomplishment
+of pointing at game, although a pure result of education, appears in
+the young pups brought up apart from their parents and kind.&nbsp; The
+peculiar leap of the Irish horse, acquired in the course of traversing
+a boggy country, is continued in the progeny brought up in England.&nbsp;
+This hereditariness of specific habits suggests a relation to that form
+of psychological demonstration usually called instinct; but instinct
+is only another term for mind, or is mind in a peculiar stage of development;
+and though the fact were otherwise, it could not affect the postulate,
+that demonstrations such as have been enumerated are mainly intellectual
+demonstrations, not to be distinguished as such from those of human
+beings.</p>
+<p>More than this, the lower animals manifested mental phenomena long
+before man existed.&nbsp; While as yet there was no brain capable of
+working out a mathematical problem, the economy of the six-sided figure
+was exemplified by the instinct of the bee.&nbsp; Ere human musician
+had whistled or piped, the owl hooted in B flat, the cuckoo had her
+song of a falling third, and the chirp of the cricket was in B.&nbsp;
+The dog and the elephant prefigured the sagacity of the human mind.&nbsp;
+The love of a human mother for her babe was anticipated by nearly every
+humbler mammal, the carnaria not excepted.&nbsp; The peacock strutted,
+the turkey blustered, and the cock fought for victory, just as human
+beings afterwards did, and still do.&nbsp; Our faculty of imitation,
+on which so much of our amusement depends, was exercised by the mocking-bird;
+and the whole tribe of monkeys must have walked about the pre-human
+world, playing off those tricks in which we see the comicality and mischief-making
+of our character so curiously exaggerated.</p>
+<p>The unity and simplicity which characterize nature give great antecedent
+probability to what observation seems about to establish, that, as the
+brain of the vertebrata generally is just an advanced condition of a
+particular ganglion in the mollusca and crustacea, so are the brains
+of the higher and more intelligent mammalia only farther developments
+of the brains of the inferior orders of the same class.&nbsp; Or, to
+the same purpose, it may be said, that each species has certain superior
+developments, according to its needs, while others are in a rudimental
+or repressed state.&nbsp; This will more clearly appear after some inquiry
+has been made into the various powers comprehended under the term mind.</p>
+<p>One of the first and simplest functions of mind is to give consciousness
+- consciousness of our identity and of our existence.&nbsp; This, apparently,
+is independent of the <i>senses</i>, which are simply media, and, as
+Locke has shewn, the only media, through which ideas respecting the
+external world reach the brain.&nbsp; The access of such ideas to the
+brain is the act to which the metaphysicians have given the name of
+perception.&nbsp; Gall, however, has shewn, by induction from a vast
+number of actual cases, that there is a part of the brain devoted to
+perception, and that even this is subdivided into portions which are
+respectively dedicated to the reception of different sets of ideas,
+as those of form, size, colour, weight, objects in their totality, events
+in their progress or occurrence, time, musical sounds, &amp;c.&nbsp;
+The system of mind invented by this philosopher - the only one founded
+upon nature, or which even pretends to or admits of that necessary basis
+- shews a portion of the brain acting as a faculty of comic ideas, another
+of imitation, another of wonder, one for discriminating or observing
+differences, and another in which resides the power of tracing effects
+to causes.&nbsp; There are also parts of the brain for the sentimental
+part of our nature, or the affections, at the head of which stand the
+moral feelings of benevolence, conscientiousness, and veneration.&nbsp;
+Through these, man stands in relation to himself, his fellow-men, the
+external world, and his God; and through these comes most of the happiness
+of man&rsquo;s life, as well as that which he derives from the contemplation
+of the world to come, and the cultivation of his relation to it, (pure
+religion.)&nbsp; The other sentiments may be briefly enumerated, their
+names being sufficient in general to denote their functions - firmness,
+hope, cautiousness, self-esteem, love of approbation, secretiveness,
+marvellousness, constructiveness, imitation, combativeness, destructiveness,
+concentrativeness, adhesiveness, love of the opposite sex, love of offspring,
+alimentiveness, and love of life.&nbsp; Through these faculties, man
+is connected with the external world, and supplied with active impulses
+to maintain his place in it as an individual and as a species.&nbsp;
+There is also a faculty, (language) for expressing, by whatever means,
+(signs, gestures, looks, conventional terms in speech,) the ideas which
+arise in the mind.&nbsp; There is a particular state of each of these
+faculties, when the ideas of objects once formed by it are revived or
+reproduced, a process which seems to be intimately allied with some
+of the phenomena of the new science of photography, when images impressed
+by reflection of the sun&rsquo;s rays upon sensitive paper are, after
+a temporary obliteration, resuscitated on the sheet being exposed to
+the fumes of mercury.&nbsp; Such are the phenomena of memory, that handmaid
+of intellect, without which there could be no accumulation of mental
+capital, but an universal and continual infancy.&nbsp; Conception and
+imagination appear to be only intensities, so to speak, of the state
+of brain in which memory is produced.&nbsp; On their promptness and
+power depend most of the exertions which distinguish the man of arts
+and letters, and even in no small measure the cultivator of science.</p>
+<p>The faculties above described - the actual elements of the mental
+constitution - are seen in mature man in an indefinite potentiality
+and range of action.&nbsp; It is different with the lower animals.&nbsp;
+They are there comparatively definite in their power and restricted
+in their application.&nbsp; The reader is familiar with what are called
+instincts in some of the humbler species, that is, an uniform and unprompted
+tendency towards certain particular acts, as the building of cells by
+the bee, the storing of provisions by that insect and several others,
+and the construction of nests for a coming progeny by birds.&nbsp; This
+quality is nothing more than a mode of operation peculiar to the faculties
+in a humble state of endowment, or early stage of development.&nbsp;
+The cell formation of the bee, the house-building of ants and beavers,
+the web-spinning of spiders, are but primitive exercises of constructiveness,
+the faculty which, indefinite with us, leads to the arts of the weaver,
+upholsterer, architect, and mechanist, and makes us often work delightedly
+where our labours are in vain, or nearly so.&nbsp; The storing of provisions
+by the ants is an exercise of acquisitiveness, - the faculty which with
+us makes rich men and misers.&nbsp; A vast number of curious devices,
+by which insects provide for the protection and subsistence of their
+young, whom they are perhaps never to see, are most probably a peculiar
+restricted effort of philoprogenitiveness.&nbsp; The common source of
+this class of acts, and of common mental operations, is shewn very convincingly
+by the melting of the one set into the other.&nbsp; Thus, for example,
+the bee and bird will make modifications in the ordinary form of their
+cells and nests when necessity compels them.&nbsp; Thus, the alimentiveness
+of such animals as the dog, usually definite with regard to quantity
+and quality, can be pampered or educated up to a kind of epicurism,
+that is, an indefiniteness of object and action.&nbsp; The same faculty
+acts limitedly in ourselves at first, dictating the special act of sucking;
+afterwards it acquires indefiniteness.&nbsp; Such is the real nature
+of the distinction between what are called instincts and reason, upon
+which so many volumes have been written without profit to the world.&nbsp;
+All faculties are instinctive, that is, dependent on internal and inherent
+impulses.&nbsp; This term is therefore not specially applicable to either
+of the recognised modes of the operation of the faculties.&nbsp; We
+only, in the one case, see the faculty in an immature and slightly developed
+state; in the other, in its most advanced condition.&nbsp; In the one
+case it is <i>definite</i>, in the other <i>indefinite</i>, in its range
+of action.&nbsp; These terms would perhaps be the most suitable for
+expressing the distinction.</p>
+<p>In the humblest forms of being we can trace scarcely anything besides
+a definite action in a few of the faculties.&nbsp; Generally speaking,
+as we ascend in the scale, we see more and more of the faculties in
+exercise, and these tending more to the indefinite mode of manifestation.&nbsp;
+And for this there is the obvious reason in providence, that the lowest
+animals have all of them a very limited sphere of existence, born only
+to perform a few functions, and enjoy a brief term of life, and then
+give way to another generation, so that they do not need much mental
+guidance.&nbsp; At higher points in the scale, the sphere of existence
+is considerably extended, and the mental operations are less definite
+accordingly.&nbsp; The horse, dog, and a few other rasorial types, noted
+for their serviceableness to our race, have the indefinite powers in
+no small endowment.&nbsp; Man, again, shews very little of the definite
+mode of operation, and that little chiefly in childhood, or in barbarism
+or idiocy.&nbsp; Destined for a wide field of action, and to be applicable
+to infinitely varied contingencies, he has all the faculties developed
+to a high pitch of indefiniteness, that he may be ready to act well
+in all imaginable cases.&nbsp; His commission, it may be said, gives
+large discretionary powers, while that of the inferior animals is limited
+to a few precise directions.&nbsp; But when the human brain is congenitally
+imperfect or diseased, or when it is in the state of infancy, we see
+in it an approach towards the character of the brains of some of the
+inferior animals.&nbsp; Dr. G. J. Davey states that he has frequently
+witnessed, among his patients at the Hanwell Lunatic Asylum, indications
+of a particular abnormal cerebration which forcibly reminded him of
+the specific healthy characteristics of animals lower in the scale of
+organization; <a name="citation346"></a><a href="#footnote346">{346}</a>
+and every one must have observed how often the actions of children,
+especially in their moments of play, and where their selfish feelings
+are concerned, bear a resemblance to those of certain familiar animals.
+<a name="citation347"></a><a href="#footnote347">{347}</a>&nbsp; Behold,
+then, the wonderful unity of the whole system.&nbsp; The grades of mind,
+like the forms of being, are mere stages of development.&nbsp; In the
+humbler forms, but a few of the mental faculties are traceable, just
+as we see in them but a few of the lineaments of universal structure.&nbsp;
+In man the system has arrived at its highest condition.&nbsp; The few
+gleams of reason, then, which we see in the lower animals, are precisely
+analogous to such a development of the fore-arm as we find in the paddle
+of the whale.&nbsp; Causality, comparison, and other of the nobler faculties,
+are in them <i>rudimental.</i></p>
+<p>Bound up as we thus are by an identity in the character of our mental
+organization with the lower animals, we are yet, it will be observed,
+strikingly distinguished from them by this great advance in development.&nbsp;
+We have faculties in full force and activity which the animals either
+possess not at all, or in so low and obscure a form as to be equivalent
+to non-existence.&nbsp; Now these parts of mind are those which connect
+us with the things that are not of this world.&nbsp; We have veneration,
+prompting us to the worship of the Deity, which the animals lack.&nbsp;
+We have hope, to carry us on in thought beyond the bounds of time.&nbsp;
+We have reason, to enable us to inquire into the character of the Great
+Father, and the relation of us, his humble creatures, towards him.&nbsp;
+We have conscientiousness and benevolence, by which we can in a faint
+and humble measure imitate, in our conduct, that which he exemplifies
+in the whole of his wondrous doings.&nbsp; Beyond this, mental science
+does not carry us in support of religion: the rest depends on evidence
+of a different kind.&nbsp; But it is surely much that we thus discover
+in nature a provision for things so important.&nbsp; The existence of
+faculties having a regard to such things is a good evidence that such
+things exist.&nbsp; The face of God is reflected in the organization
+of man, as a little pool reflects the glorious sun.</p>
+<p>The affective or sentimental faculties are all of them liable to
+operate whenever appropriate objects or stimuli are presented, and this
+they do as irresistibly and unerringly as the tree sucks up moisture
+which it requires, with only this exception, that one faculty often
+interferes with the action of another, and operates instead by force
+of superior inherent strength or temporary activity.&nbsp; For example,
+alimentiveness may be in powerful operation with regard to its appropriate
+object, producing a keen appetite, and yet it may not act, in consequence
+of the more powerful operation of cautiousness, warning against evil
+consequences likely to ensue from the desired indulgence.&nbsp; This
+liability to flit from under the control of one feeling to the control
+of another, constitutes what is recognised as free will in man, being
+nothing more than a vicissitude in the supremacy of the faculties over
+each other.</p>
+<p>It is a common mistake to suppose that the individuals of our own
+species are all of them formed with similar faculties - similar in power
+and tendency - and that education and the influence of circumstances
+produce all the differences which we observe.&nbsp; There is not, in
+the old systems of mental philosophy, any doctrine more opposite to
+the truth than this.&nbsp; It is refuted at once by the great differences
+of intellectual tendency and moral disposition to be observed amongst
+a group of young children who have been all brought up in circumstances
+perfectly identical - even in twins, who have never been but in one
+place, under the charge of one nurse, attended to alike in all respects.&nbsp;
+The mental characters of individuals are inherently various, as the
+forms of their persons and the features of their faces are; and education
+and circumstances, though their influence is not to be despised, are
+incapable of entirely altering these characters, where they are strongly
+developed.&nbsp; That the original characters of mind are dependent
+on the volume of particular parts of the brain and the general quality
+of that viscus, is proved by induction from an extensive range of observations,
+the force of which must have been long since universally acknowledged
+but for the unpreparedness of mankind to admit a functional connexion
+between mind and body.&nbsp; The different mental characters of individuals
+may be presumed from analogy to depend on the same law of development
+which we have seen determining forms of being and the mental characters
+of particular species.&nbsp; This we may conceive as carrying forward
+the intellectual powers and moral dispositions of some to a high pitch,
+repressing those of others at a moderate amount, and thus producing
+all the varieties which we see in our fellow-creatures.&nbsp; Thus a
+Cuvier and a Newton are but expansions of a clown, and the person emphatically
+called the wicked man, is one whose highest moral feelings are rudimental.&nbsp;
+Such differences are not confined to our species; they are only less
+strongly marked in many of the inferior animals.&nbsp; There are clever
+dogs and wicked horses, as well as clever men and wicked men, and education
+sharpens the talents, and in some degree regulates the dispositions
+of animals, as it does our own.&nbsp; Here I may advert to a very interesting
+analogy between the mental characters of the types in the quinary system
+of zoology and the characters of individual men.&nbsp; We have seen
+that the pre-eminent type is usually endowed with an harmonious assemblage
+of the mental qualities belonging to the whole group, while the sub-typical
+inclines to ferocity, the rasorial to gentleness, and so on.&nbsp; Now,
+amongst individuals, some appear to be almost exclusively of the sub-typical,
+and others of the rasorial characters, while to a limited number is
+given the finely assorted assemblage of qualities which places them
+on a parallel with the typical.&nbsp; To this may be attributed the
+universality which marks all the very highest brains, such as those
+of Shakespeare and Scott, men of whom it has been remarked that they
+must have possessed within themselves not only the poet, but the warrior,
+the statesman, and the philosopher; and who, moreover, appear to have
+had the mild and manly, the moral and the forcible parts of our nature,
+in the most perfect balance.</p>
+<p>There is, nevertheless, a general adaptation of the mental constitution
+of man to the circumstances in which he lives, as there is between all
+the parts of nature to each other.&nbsp; The goods of the physical world
+are only to be realized by ingenuity and industrious exertion; behold,
+accordingly, an intellect full of device, and a fabric of the faculties
+which would go to pieces or destroy itself if it were not kept in constant
+occupation.&nbsp; Nature presents to us much that is sublime and beautiful:
+behold faculties which delight in contemplating these properties of
+hers, and in rising upon them, as upon wings, to the presence of the
+Eternal.&nbsp; It is also a world of difficulties and perils, and see
+how a large portion of our species are endowed with vigorous powers
+which take a pleasure in meeting and overcoming difficulty and danger.&nbsp;
+Even that principle on which our faculties are constituted - a wide
+range of freedom in which to act for all various occasions - necessitates
+a resentful faculty, by which individuals may protect themselves from
+the undue and capricious exercise of each other&rsquo;s faculties, and
+thus preserve their individual rights.&nbsp; So also there is cautiousness,
+to give us a tendency to provide against the evils by which we may be
+assailed; and secretiveness, to enable us to conceal whatever, being
+divulged, would be offensive to others or injurious to ourselves, -
+a function which obviously has a certain legitimate range of action,
+however liable to be abused.&nbsp; The constitution of the mind generally
+points to a state of intimate relation of individuals towards society,
+towards the external world, and towards things above this world.&nbsp;
+No individual being is integral or independent; he is only part of an
+extensive piece of social mechanism.&nbsp; The inferior mind, full of
+rude energy and unregulated impulse, does not more require a superior
+nature to act as its master and its mentor, than does the superior nature
+require to be surrounded by such rough elements on which to exercise
+its high endowments as a ruling and tutelary power.&nbsp; This relation
+of each to each produces a vast portion of the active business of life.&nbsp;
+It is easy to see that, if we were all alike in our moral tendencies,
+and all placed on a medium of perfect moderation in this respect, the
+world would be a scene of everlasting dulness and apathy.&nbsp; It requires
+the variety of individual constitution to give moral life to the scene.</p>
+<p>The indefiniteness of the potentiality of the human faculties, and
+the complexity which thus attends their relations, lead unavoidably
+to occasional error.&nbsp; If we consider for a moment that there are
+not less than thirty such faculties, that they are each given in different
+proportions to different persons, that each is at the same time endowed
+with a wide discretion as to the force and frequency of its action,
+and that our neighbours, the world, and our connexions with something
+beyond it, are all exercising an ever-varying influence over us, we
+cannot be surprised at the irregularities attending human conduct.&nbsp;
+It is simply the penalty paid for the superior endowment.&nbsp; It is
+here that the imperfection of our nature resides.&nbsp; Causality and
+conscientiousness are, it is true, guides over all; but even these are
+only faculties of the same indeterminate constitution as the rest, and
+partake accordingly of the same inequality of action.&nbsp; Man is therefore
+a piece of mechanism, which never can act so as to satisfy his own ideas
+of what he might be - for he can imagine a state of moral perfection,
+(as he can imagine a globe formed of diamonds, pearls, and rubies,)
+though his constitution forbids him to realize it.&nbsp; There ever
+will, in the best disposed and most disciplined minds, be occasional
+discrepancies between the amount of temptation and the power summoned
+for regulation or resistance, or between the stimulus and the mobility
+of the faculty; and hence those errors, and shortcomings, and excesses,
+without end, with which the good are constantly finding cause to charge
+themselves.&nbsp; There is at the same time even here a possibility
+of improvement.&nbsp; In infancy, the impulses are all of them irregular;
+a child is cruel, cunning, and false, under the slightest temptation,
+but in time learns to control these inclinations, and to be habitually
+humane, frank, and truthful.&nbsp; So is human society, in its earliest
+stages, sanguinary, aggressive, and deceitful, but in time becomes just,
+faithful, and benevolent.&nbsp; To such improvements there is a natural
+tendency which will operate in all fair circumstances, though it is
+not to be expected that irregular and undue impulses will ever be altogether
+banished from the system.</p>
+<p>It may still be a puzzle to many, how beings should be born into
+the world whose organization is such that they unavoidably, even in
+a civilized country, become malefactors.&nbsp; Does God, it may be asked,
+make criminals?&nbsp; Does he fashion certain beings with a predestination
+to evil?&nbsp; He does not do so; and yet the criminal type of brain,
+as it is called, comes into existence in accordance with laws which
+the Deity has established.&nbsp; It is not, however, as the result of
+the first or general intention of those laws, but as an exception from
+their ordinary and proper action.&nbsp; The production of those evilly
+disposed beings is in this manner.&nbsp; The moral character of the
+progeny depends in a general way, (as does the physical character also,)
+upon conditions of the parents, - both general conditions, and conditions
+at the particular time of the commencement of the existence of the new
+being, and likewise external conditions affecting the f&oelig;tus through
+the mother.&nbsp; Now the amount of these conditions is indefinite.&nbsp;
+The faculties of the parents, as far as these are concerned, may have
+oscillated for the time towards the extreme of tensibility in one direction.&nbsp;
+The influences upon the f&oelig;tus may have also been of an extreme
+and unusual kind.&nbsp; Let us suppose that the conditions upon the
+whole have been favourable for the development, not of the higher, but
+of the lower sentiments, and of the propensities of the new being, the
+result will necessarily be a mean type of brain.&nbsp; Here, it will
+be observed, God no more decreed an immoral being, than he decreed an
+immoral paroxysm of the sentiments.&nbsp; Our perplexity is in considering
+the ill-disposed being by himself.&nbsp; He is only a part of a series
+of phenomena, traceable to a principle good in the main, but which admits
+of evil as an exception.&nbsp; We have seen that it is for wise ends
+that God leaves our moral faculties to an indefinite range of action;
+the general good results of this arrangement are obvious; but exceptions
+of evil are inseparable from such a system, and this is one of them.&nbsp;
+To come to particular illustration - when a people are oppressed, or
+kept in a state of slavery, they invariably contract habits of lying,
+for the purpose of deceiving and outwitting their superiors, falsehood
+being a refuge of the weak under difficulties.&nbsp; What is a habit
+in parents becomes an inherent quality in children.&nbsp; We are not,
+therefore, to be surprised when a traveller tells us that black children
+in the West Indies appear to lie by instinct, and never answer a white
+person truly even in the simplest matter.&nbsp; Here we have secretiveness
+roused in a people to a state of constant and exalted exercise; an over
+tendency of the nervous energy in that direction is the consequence,
+and a new organic condition is established.&nbsp; This tells upon the
+progeny, which comes into the world with secretiveness excessive in
+volume and activity.&nbsp; All other evil characteristics may be readily
+conceived as being implanted in a new generation in the same way.&nbsp;
+And sometimes not one, but several generations, may be concerned in
+bringing up the result to a pitch which produces crime.&nbsp; It is,
+however, to be observed, that the general tendency of things is to a
+limitation, not the extension of such abnormally constituted beings.&nbsp;
+The criminal brain finds itself in a social scene where all is against
+it.&nbsp; It may struggle on for a time, but the medium and superior
+natures are never long at a loss in getting the better of it.&nbsp;
+The disposal of such beings will always depend much on the moral state
+of a community, the degree in which just views prevail with regard to
+human nature, and the feelings which accident may have caused to predominate
+at a particular time.&nbsp; Where the mass was little enlightened or
+refined, and terrors for life or property were highly excited, malefactors
+have ever been treated severely.&nbsp; But when order is generally triumphant,
+and reason allowed sway, men begin to see the true case of criminals
+- namely, that while one large department are victims of erroneous social
+conditions, another are brought to error by tendencies which they are
+only unfortunate in having inherited from nature.&nbsp; Criminal jurisprudence
+then addresses itself less to the direct punishment than to the reformation
+and care-taking of those liable to its attention.&nbsp; And such a treatment
+of criminals, it may be farther remarked, so that it stop short of affording
+any encouragement to crime, (a point which experience will determine,)
+is evidently no more than justice, seeing how accidentally all forms
+of the moral constitution are distributed, and how thoroughly mutual
+obligation shines throughout the whole frame of society - the strong
+to help the weak, the good to redeem and restrain the bad.</p>
+<p>The sum of all we have seen of the psychical constitution of man
+is, that its Almighty Author has destined it, like everything else,
+to be developed from inherent qualities, and to have a mode of action
+depending solely on its own organization.&nbsp; Thus the whole is complete
+on one principle.&nbsp; The masses of space are formed by law; law makes
+them in due time theatres of existence for plants and animals; sensation,
+disposition, intellect, are all in like manner developed and sustained
+in action by law.&nbsp; It is most interesting to observe into how small
+a field the whole of the mysteries of nature thus ultimately resolve
+themselves.&nbsp; The inorganic has one final comprehensive law, GRAVITATION.&nbsp;
+The organic, the other great department of mundane things, rests in
+like manner on one law, and that is, - DEVELOPMENT.&nbsp; Nor may even
+these be after all twain, but only branches of one still more comprehensive
+law, the expression of that unity which man&rsquo;s wit can scarcely
+separate from Deity itself.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>PURPOSE AND GENERAL CONDITION OF THE ANIMATED CREATION.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>We have now to inquire how this view of the constitution and origin
+of nature bears upon the condition of man upon the earth, and his relation
+to supra-mundane things.</p>
+<p>That enjoyment is the proper attendant of animal existence is pressed
+upon us by all that we see and all we experience.&nbsp; Everywhere we
+perceive in the lower creatures, in their ordinary condition, symptoms
+of enjoyment.&nbsp; Their whole being is a system of needs, the supplying
+of which is gratification, and of faculties, the exercise of which is
+pleasurable.&nbsp; When we consult our own sensations, we find that,
+even in a sense of a healthy performance of all the functions of the
+animal economy, God has furnished us with an innocent and very high
+enjoyment.&nbsp; The mere quiet consciousness of a healthy play of the
+mental functions - a mind at ease with itself and all around it - is
+in like manner extremely agreeable.&nbsp; This negative class of enjoyments,
+it may be remarked, is likely to be even more extensively experienced
+by the lower animals than by man, at least in the proportion of their
+absolute endowments, as their mental and bodily functions are much less
+liable to derangement than ours.&nbsp; To find the world constituted
+on this principle is only what in reason we would expect.&nbsp; We cannot
+conceive that so vast a system could have been created for a contrary
+purpose.&nbsp; No averagely constituted human being would, in his own
+limited sphere of action, think of producing a similar system upon an
+opposite principle.&nbsp; But to form so vast a range of being, and
+to make being everywhere a source of gratification, is conformable to
+our ideas of a Creator in whom we are constantly discovering traits
+of a nature, of which our own is but a faint and far-cast shadow at
+the best.</p>
+<p>It appears at first difficult to reconcile with this idea the many
+miseries which we see all sentient beings, ourselves included, occasionally
+enduring.&nbsp; How, the sage has asked in every age, should a Being
+so transcendently kind, have allowed of so large an admixture of evil
+in the condition of his creatures?&nbsp; Do we not at length find an
+answer to a certain extent satisfactory, in the view which has now been
+given of the constitution of nature?&nbsp; We there see the Deity operating
+in the most august of his works by fixed laws, an arrangement which,
+it is clear, only admits of the main and primary results being good,
+but disregards exceptions.&nbsp; Now the mechanical laws are so definite
+in their purposes, that no exceptions ever take place in that department;
+if there is a certain quantity of nebulous matter to be agglomerated
+and divided and set in motion as a planetary system, it will be so with
+hair&rsquo;s-breadth accuracy, and cannot be otherwise.&nbsp; But the
+laws presiding over meteorology, life, and mind, are necessarily less
+definite, as they have to produce a great variety of mutually related
+results.&nbsp; Left to act independently of each other, each according
+to its separate commission, and each with a wide range of potentiality
+to be modified by associated conditions, they can only have effects
+generally beneficial: often there must be an interference of one law
+with another, often a law will chance to operate in excess, or upon
+a wrong object, and thus evil will be produced.&nbsp; Thus, winds are
+generally useful in many ways, and the sea is useful as a means of communication
+between one country and another; but the natural laws which produce
+winds are of indefinite range of action, and sometimes are unusually
+concentrated in space or in time, so as to produce storms and hurricanes,
+by which much damage is done; the sea may be by these causes violently
+agitated, so that many barks and many lives perish.&nbsp; Here, it is
+evident, the evil is only exceptive.&nbsp; Suppose, again, that a boy,
+in the course of the lively sports proper to his age, suffers a fall
+which injures his spine, and renders him a cripple for life.&nbsp; Two
+things have been concerned in the case: first, the love of violent exercise,
+and second, the law of gravitation.&nbsp; Both of these things are good
+in the main.&nbsp; In the rash enterprises and rough sports in which
+boys engage, they prepare their bodies and minds for the hard tasks
+of life.&nbsp; By gravitation, all moveable things, our own bodies included,
+are kept stable on the surface of the earth.&nbsp; But when it chances
+that the playful boy loses his hold (we shall say) of the branch of
+a tree, and has no solid support immediately below, the law of gravitation
+unrelentingly pulls him to the ground, and thus he is hurt.&nbsp; Now
+it was not a primary object of gravitation to injure boys; but gravitation
+could not but operate in the circumstances, its nature being to be universal
+and invariable.&nbsp; The evil is, therefore, only a casual exception
+from something in the main good.</p>
+<p>The same explanation applies to even the most conspicuous of the
+evils which afflict society.&nbsp; War, it may be said, and said truly,
+is a tremendous example of evil, in the misery, hardship, waste of human
+life, and mis-spending of human energies, which it occasions.&nbsp;
+But what is it that produces war?&nbsp; Certain tendencies of human
+nature, as keen assertion of a supposed right, resentment of supposed
+injury, acquisitiveness, desire of admiration, combativeness, or mere
+love of excitement.&nbsp; All of these are tendencies which are every
+day, in a legitimate extent of action, producing great and indispensable
+benefits to us.&nbsp; Man would be a tame, indolent, unserviceable being
+without them, and his fate would be starvation.&nbsp; War, then, huge
+evil though it be, is, after all, but the exceptive case, a casual misdirection
+of properties and powers essentially good.&nbsp; God has given us the
+tendencies for a benevolent purpose.&nbsp; He has only not laid down
+any absolute obstruction to our misuse of them.&nbsp; That were an arrangement
+of a kind which he has nowhere made.&nbsp; But he has established many
+laws in our nature which tend to lessen the frequency and destructiveness
+of these abuses.&nbsp; Our reason comes to see that war is purely an
+evil, even to the conqueror.&nbsp; Benevolence interposes to make its
+ravages less mischievous to human comfort, and less destructive to human
+life.&nbsp; Men begin to find that their more active powers can be exercised
+with equal gratification on legitimate objects; for example, in overcoming
+the natural difficulties of their path through life, or in a generous
+spirit of emulation in a line of duty beneficial to themselves and their
+fellow-creatures.&nbsp; Thus, war at length shrinks into a comparatively
+narrow compass, though there certainly is no reason to suppose that
+it will be at any early period, if ever, altogether dispensed with,
+while man&rsquo;s constitution remains as it is.&nbsp; In considering
+an evil of this kind, we must not limit our view to our own or any past
+time.&nbsp; Placed upon the earth with faculties prepared to act, but
+inexperienced, and with the more active propensities necessarily in
+great force to suit the condition of the globe, man was apt to misuse
+his powers much in this way at first, compared with what he is likely
+to do when he advances into a condition of civilization.&nbsp; In the
+scheme of providence, thousands of years of frequent warfare, all the
+so-called glories which fill history, may be only an exception to the
+general rule.</p>
+<p>The sex passion in like manner leads to great evils; but the evils
+are only an exception from the vast mass of good connected with this
+affection.&nbsp; Providence has seen it necessary to make very ample
+provision for the preservation and utmost possible extension of all
+species.&nbsp; The aim seems to be to diffuse existence as widely as
+possible, to fill up every vacant piece of space with some sentient
+being to be a vehicle of enjoyment.&nbsp; Hence this passion is conferred
+in great force.&nbsp; But the relation between the number of beings,
+and the means of supporting them, is only on the footing of general
+law.&nbsp; There may be occasional discrepancies between the laws operating
+for the multiplication of individuals, and the laws operating to supply
+them with the means of subsistence, and evils will be endured in consequence,
+even in our own highly favoured species.&nbsp; But against all these
+evils, and against those numberless vexations which have arisen in all
+ages from the attachment of the sexes, place the vast amount of happiness
+which is derived from this source - the basis of the whole circle of
+the domestic affections, the sweetening principle of life, the prompter
+of all our most generous feelings, and even of our most virtuous resolves
+- and every ill that can be traced to it is but as dust in the balance.&nbsp;
+And here, also, we must be on our guard against judging from what we
+see in the world at a particular era.&nbsp; As reason and the higher
+sentiments of man&rsquo;s nature increase in force, this passion is
+put under better regulation, so as to lessen many of the evils connected
+with it.&nbsp; The civilized man is more able to give it due control;
+his attachments are less the result of impulse; he studies more the
+weal of his partner and offspring.&nbsp; There are even some of the
+resentful feelings connected in early society with love, such as hatred
+of successful rivalry, and jealousy, which almost disappear in an advanced
+stage of civilization.&nbsp; The evils springing, in our own species
+at least, from this passion, may therefore be an exception mainly peculiar
+to a particular term of the world&rsquo;s progress, and which may be
+expected to decrease greatly in amount.</p>
+<p>With respect, again, to disease, so prolific a cause of suffering
+to man, the human constitution is merely a complicated but regular process
+in electro-chemistry, which goes on well, and is a source of continual
+gratification, so long as nothing occurs to interfere with it injuriously,
+but which is liable every moment to be deranged by various external
+agencies, when it becomes a source of pain, and, if the injury be severe,
+ceases to be capable of retaining life.&nbsp; It may be readily admitted
+that the evils experienced in this way are very great; but, after all,
+such experiences are no more than occasional, and not necessarily frequent
+- exceptions from a general rule of which the direct action is to confer
+happiness.&nbsp; The human constitution might have been made of a more
+hardy character; but we always see hardiness and insensibility go together,
+and it may be of course presumed that we only could have purchased this
+immunity from suffering at the expense of a large portion of that delicacy
+in which lie some of our most agreeable sensations.&nbsp; Or man&rsquo;s
+faculties might have been restricted to definiteness of action, as is
+greatly the case with those of the lower animals, and thus we should
+have been equally safe from the aberrations which lead to disease; but
+in that event we should have been incapable of acting to so many different
+purposes as we are, and of the many high enjoyments which the varied
+action of our faculties places in our power: we should not, in short,
+have been human beings, but merely on a level with the inferior animals.&nbsp;
+Thus, it appears, that the very fineness of man&rsquo;s constitution,
+that which places him in such a high relation to the mundane economy,
+and makes him the vehicle of so many exquisitely delightful sensations
+- it is this which makes him liable to the sufferings of disease.&nbsp;
+It might be said, on the other hand, that the noxiousness of the agencies
+producing disease might have been diminished or extinguished; but the
+probability is, that this could not have been done without such a derangement
+of the whole economy of nature as would have been attended with more
+serious evils.&nbsp; For example - a large class of diseases are the
+result of effluvia from decaying organic matter.&nbsp; This kind of
+matter is known to be extremely useful, when mixed with earth, in favouring
+the process of vegetation.&nbsp; Supposing the noxiousness to the human
+constitution done away with, might we not also lose that important quality
+which tends so largely to increase the food raised from the ground?&nbsp;
+Perhaps (as has been suggested) the noxiousness is even a matter of
+special design, to induce us to put away decaying organic substances
+into the earth, where they are calculated to be so useful.&nbsp; Now
+man has reason to enable him to see that such substances are beneficial
+under one arrangement, and noxious in the other.&nbsp; He is, as it
+were, commanded to take the right method in dealing with it.&nbsp; In
+point of fact, men do not always take this method, but allow accumulations
+of noxious matter to gather close about their dwellings, where they
+generate fevers and agues.&nbsp; But their doing so may be regarded
+as only a temporary exception from the operation of mental laws, the
+general tendency of which is to make men adopt the proper measures.&nbsp;
+And these measures will probably be in time universally adopted, so
+that one extensive class of diseases will be altogether or nearly abolished.</p>
+<p>Another large class of diseases spring from mismanagement of our
+personal economy.&nbsp; Eating to excess, eating and drinking what is
+noxious, disregard to that cleanliness which is necessary for the right
+action of the functions of the skin, want of fresh air for the supply
+of the lungs, undue, excessive, and irregular indulgence of the mental
+affections, are all of them recognised modes of creating that derangement
+of the system in which disease consists.&nbsp; Here also it may be said
+that a limitation of the mental faculties to definite manifestations
+(<i>vulgo</i>, instincts) might have enabled us to avoid many of these
+errors; but here again we are met by the consideration that, if we had
+been so endowed, we should have been only as the lower animals are,
+wanting that transcendently higher character of sensation and power,
+by which our enjoyments are made so much greater.&nbsp; In making the
+desire of food, for example, with us an indefinite mental manifestation,
+instead of the definite one, which it is amongst the lower animals,
+the Creator has given us a means of deriving far greater gratifications
+from food (consistently with health) than the lower animals appear to
+be capable of.&nbsp; He has also given us reason to act as a guiding
+and controlling power over this and other propensities, so that they
+may be prevented from becoming causes of malady.&nbsp; We can see that
+excess is injurious, and are thus prompted to moderation.&nbsp; We can
+see that all the things which we feel inclined to take are not healthful,
+and are thus exhorted to avoid what are pernicious.&nbsp; We can also
+see that a cleanly skin and a constant supply of pure air are necessary
+to the proper performance of some of the most important of the organic
+functions, and thus are stimulated to frequent ablution, and to a right
+ventilation of our parlours and sleeping apartments.&nbsp; And so on
+with the other causes of disease.&nbsp; Reason may not operate very
+powerfully to these purposes in an early state of society, and prodigious
+evils may therefore have been endured from disease in past ages; but
+these are not necessarily to be endured always.&nbsp; As civilization
+advances, reason acquires a greater ascendancy; the causes of the evils
+are seen and avoided; and disease shrinks into a comparatively narrow
+compass.&nbsp; The experience of our own country places this in a striking
+light.&nbsp; In the middle ages, when large towns had no police regulations,
+society was every now and then scourged by pestilence.&nbsp; The third
+of the people of Europe are said to have been carried off by one epidemic.&nbsp;
+Even in London the annual mortality has greatly sunk within a century.&nbsp;
+The improvement in human life, which has taken place since the construction
+of the Northampton tables by Dr. Price, is equally remarkable.&nbsp;
+Modern tables still shew a prodigious mortality among the young in all
+civilized countries - evidently a result of some prevalent error in
+the usual modes of rearing them.&nbsp; But to remedy this evil there
+is the sagacity of the human mind, and the sense to adopt any reformed
+plans which may be shewn to be necessary.&nbsp; By a change in the management
+of an orphan institution in London, during the last fifty years, an
+immense reduction in the mortality took place.&nbsp; We may of course
+hope to see measures devised and adopted for producing a similar improvement
+of infant life throughout the world at large.</p>
+<p>In this part of our subject, the most difficult point certainly lies
+in those occurrences of disease where the afflicted individual has been
+in no degree concerned in bringing the visitation upon himself.&nbsp;
+Daily experience shews us infectious disease arising in a place where
+the natural laws in respect of cleanliness are neglected, and then spreading
+into regions where there is no blame of this kind.&nbsp; We then see
+the innocent suffering equally with those who may be called the guilty.&nbsp;
+Nay, the benevolent physician who comes to succour the miserable beings
+whose error may have caused the mischief, is sometimes seen to fall
+a victim to it, while many of his patients recover.&nbsp; We are also
+only too familiar with the transmission of diseases from erring parents
+to innocent children, who, accordingly suffer, and perhaps die prematurely,
+as it were for the sins of others.&nbsp; After all, however painful
+such cases may be in contemplation, they cannot be regarded in any other
+light than as exceptions from arrangements, the general working of which
+is beneficial.</p>
+<p>With regard to the innocence of the suffering parties, there is one
+important consideration which is pressed upon us from many quarters,
+namely - that moral conditions have not the least concern in the working
+of these simply physical laws.&nbsp; These laws proceed with an entire
+independence of all such conditions, and desirably so, for otherwise
+there could be no certain dependence placed upon them.&nbsp; Thus it
+may happen that two persons ascending a piece of scaffolding, the one
+a virtuous, the other a vicious man, the former, being the less cautious
+of the two, ventures upon an insecure place, falls, and is killed, while
+the other, choosing a better footing, remains uninjured.&nbsp; It is
+not in what we can conceive of the nature of things, that there should
+be a special exemption from the ordinary laws of matter, to save this
+virtuous man.&nbsp; So it might be that, of two physicians, attending
+fever cases, in a mean part of a large city, the one, an excellent citizen,
+may stand in such a position with respect to the beds of the patients
+as to catch the infection, of which he dies in a few days, while the
+other, a bad husband and father, and who, unlike the other, only attends
+such cases with selfish ends, takes care to be as much as possible out
+of the stream of infection, and accordingly escapes.&nbsp; In both of
+these cases man&rsquo;s sense of good and evil - his faculty of conscientiousness
+- would incline him to destine the vicious man to destruction and save
+the virtuous.&nbsp; But the Great Ruler of Nature does not act on such
+principles.&nbsp; He has established laws for the operation of inanimate
+matter, which are quite unswerving, so that when we know them, we have
+only to act in a certain way with respect to them, in order to obtain
+all the benefits and avoid all the evils connected with them.&nbsp;
+He has likewise established moral laws in our nature, which are equally
+unswerving, (allowing for their wider range of action,) and from obedience
+to which unfailing good is to be derived.&nbsp; But the two sets of
+laws are independent of each other.&nbsp; Obedience to each gives only
+its own proper advantage, not the advantage proper to the other.&nbsp;
+Hence it is that virtue forms no protection against the evils connected
+with the physical laws, while, on the other hand, a man skilled in and
+attentive to these, but unrighteous and disregardful of his neighbour,
+is in like manner not protected by his attention to physical circumstances
+from the proper consequences of neglect or breach of the moral laws.</p>
+<p>Thus it is that the innocence of the party suffering for the faults
+of a parent, or of any other person or set of persons, is evidently
+a consideration quite apart from that suffering.</p>
+<p>It is clear, moreover, from the whole scope of the natural laws,
+that the individual, as far as the present sphere of being is concerned,
+is to the Author of Nature a consideration of inferior moment.&nbsp;
+Everywhere we see the arrangements for the species perfect; the individual
+is left, as it were, to take his chance amidst the <i>m&ecirc;l&eacute;e</i>
+of the various laws affecting him.&nbsp; If he be found inferiorly endowed,
+or ill befalls him, there was at least no partiality against him.&nbsp;
+The system has the fairness of a lottery, in which every one has the
+like chance of drawing the prize.</p>
+<p>Yet it is also to be observed that few evils are altogether unmixed.&nbsp;
+God, contemplating apparently the unbending action of his great laws,
+has established others which appear to be designed to have a compensating,
+a repairing, and a consoling effect.&nbsp; Suppose, for instance, that,
+from a defect in the power of development in a mother, her offspring
+is ushered into the world destitute of some of the most useful members,
+or blind, or deaf, or of imperfect intellect, there is ever to be found
+in the parents and other relatives, and in the surrounding public, a
+sympathy with the sufferer, which tends to make up for the deficiency,
+so that he is in the long run not much a loser.&nbsp; Indeed, the benevolence
+implanted in our nature seems to be an arrangement having for one of
+its principal objects to cause us, by sympathy and active aid, to remedy
+the evils unavoidably suffered by our fellow-creatures in the course
+of the operation of the other natural laws.&nbsp; And even in the sufferer
+himself, it is often found that a defect in one point is made up for
+by an extra power in another.&nbsp; The blind come to have a sense of
+touch much more acute than those who see.&nbsp; Persons born without
+hands have been known to acquire a power of using their feet for a number
+of the principal offices usually served by that member.&nbsp; I need
+hardly say how remarkably fatuity is compensated by the more than usual
+regard paid to the children born with it by their parents, and the zeal
+which others usually feel to protect and succour such persons.&nbsp;
+In short, we never see evil of any kind take place where there is not
+some remedy or compensating principle ready to interfere for its alleviation.&nbsp;
+And there can be no doubt that in this manner suffering of all kinds
+is very much relieved.</p>
+<p>We may, then, regard the globes of space as theatres designed for
+the residence of animated sentient beings, placed there with this as
+their first and most obvious purpose - namely, to be sensible of enjoyments
+from the exercise of their faculties in relation to external things.&nbsp;
+The faculties of the various species are very different, but the happiness
+of each depends on the harmony there may be between its particular faculties
+and its particular circumstances.&nbsp; For instance, place the small-brained
+sheep or ox in a good pasture, and it fully enjoys this harmony of relation;
+but man, having many more faculties, cannot be thus contented.&nbsp;
+Besides having a sufficiency of food and bodily comfort, he must have
+entertainment for his intellect, whatever be its grade, objects for
+the domestic and social affections, objects for the sentiments.&nbsp;
+He is also a progressive being, and what pleases him to-day may not
+please him to-morrow; but, in each case he demands a sphere of appropriate
+conditions in order to be happy.&nbsp; By virtue of his superior organization,
+his enjoyments are much higher and more varied than those of any of
+the lower animals; but the very complexity of circumstances affecting
+him renders it at the same time unavoidable, that his nature should
+be often inharmoniously placed and disagreeably affected, and that he
+should therefore be unhappy.&nbsp; Still unhappiness amongst mankind
+is the exception from the rule of their condition, and an exception
+which is capable of almost infinite diminution, by virtue of the improving
+reason of man, and the experience which he acquires in working out the
+problems of society.</p>
+<p>To secure the immediate means of happiness it would seem to be necessary
+for men first to study with all care the constitution of nature, and,
+secondly, to accommodate themselves to that constitution, so as to obtain
+all the realizable advantages from acting conformably to it, and to
+avoid all likely evils from disregarding it.&nbsp; It will be of no
+use to sit down and expect that things are to operate of their own accord,
+or through the direction of a partial deity, for our benefit; equally
+so were it to expose ourselves to palpable dangers, under the notion
+that we shall, for some reason, have a dispensation or exemption from
+them: we must endeavour so to place ourselves, and so to act, that the
+arrangements which Providence has made impartially for all may be in
+our favour, and not against us; such are the only means by which we
+can obtain good and avoid evil here below.&nbsp; And, in doing this,
+it is especially necessary that care be taken to avoid interfering with
+the like efforts of other men, beyond what may have been agreed upon
+by the mass as necessary for the general good.&nbsp; Such interferences,
+tending in any way to injure the body, property, or peace of a neighbour,
+or to the injury of society in general, tend very much to reflect evil
+upon ourselves, through the re-action which they produce in the feelings
+of our neighbour and of society, and also the offence which they give
+to our own conscientiousness and benevolence.&nbsp; On the other hand,
+when we endeavour to promote the efforts of our fellow-creatures to
+attain happiness, we produce a re-action of the contrary kind, the tendency
+of which is towards our own benefit.&nbsp; The one course of action
+tends to the injury, the other to the benefit of ourselves and others.&nbsp;
+By the one course the general design of the Creator towards his creatures
+is thwarted; by the other it is favoured.&nbsp; And thus we can readily
+see the most substantial grounds for regarding all moral emotions and
+doings as divine in their nature, and as a means of rising to and communing
+with God.&nbsp; Obedience is not selfishness, which it would otherwise
+be - it is worship.&nbsp; The merest barbarians have a glimmering sense
+of this philosophy, and it continually shines out more and more clearly
+in the public mind, as a nation advances in intelligence.&nbsp; Nor
+are individuals alone concerned here.&nbsp; The same rule applies as
+between one great body or class of men and another, and also between
+nations.&nbsp; Thus if one set of men keep others in the condition of
+slaves - this being a gross injustice to the subjected party, the mental
+manifestations of that party to the masters will be such as to mar the
+comfort of their lives; the minds of the masters themselves will be
+degraded by the association with beings so degraded; and thus, with
+some immediate or apparent benefit from keeping slaves, there will be
+in a far greater degree an experience of evil.&nbsp; So also, if one
+portion of a nation, engaged in a particular department of industry,
+grasp at some advantages injurious to the other sections of the people,
+the first effect will be an injury to those other portions of the nation,
+and the second a re-active injury to the injurers, making their guilt
+their punishment.&nbsp; And so when one nation commits an aggression
+upon the property or rights of another, or even pursues towards it a
+sordid or ungracious policy, the effects are sure to be redoubled evil
+from the offended party.&nbsp; All of these things are under laws which
+make the effects, on a large range, absolutely certain; and an individual,
+a party, a people, can no more act unjustly with safety, than I could
+with safety place my leg in the track of a coming wain, or attempt to
+fast thirty days.&nbsp; We have been constituted on the principle of
+only being able to realize happiness for ourselves when our fellow-creatures
+are also happy; we must therefore both do to others only as we would
+have others to do to us, and endeavour to promote their happiness as
+well as our own, in order to find ourselves truly comfortable in this
+field of existence.&nbsp; These are words which God speaks to us as
+truly through his works, as if we heard them uttered in his own voice
+from heaven.</p>
+<p>It will occur to every one, that the system here unfolded does not
+imply the most perfect conceivable love or regard on the part of the
+Deity towards his creatures.&nbsp; Constituted as we are, feeling how
+vain our efforts often are to attain happiness or avoid calamity, and
+knowing that much evil does unavoidably befall us from no fault of ours,
+we are apt to feel that this is a dreary view of the Divine economy;
+and before we have looked farther, we might be tempted to say, Far rather
+let us cling to the idea, so long received, that the Deity acts continually
+for special occasions, and gives such directions to the fate of each
+individual as he thinks meet; so that, when sorrow comes to us, we shall
+have at least the consolation of believing that it is imposed by a Father
+who loves us, and who seeks by these means to accomplish our ultimate
+good.&nbsp; Now, in the first place, if this be an untrue notion of
+the Deity and his ways, it can be of no real benefit to us; and, in
+the second, it is proper to inquire if there be necessarily in the doctrine
+of natural law any peculiarity calculated materially to affect our hitherto
+supposed relation to the Deity.&nbsp; It may be that while we are committed
+to take our chance in a natural system of undeviating operation, and
+are left with apparent ruthlessness to endure the consequences of every
+collision into which we knowingly or unknowingly come with each law
+of the system, there is a system of Mercy and Grace behind the screen
+of nature, which is to make up for all casualties endured here, and
+the very largeness of which is what makes these casualties a matter
+of indifference to God.&nbsp; For the existence of such a system, the
+actual constitution of nature is itself an argument.&nbsp; The reasoning
+may proceed thus: The system of nature assures us that benevolence is
+a leading principle in the divine mind.&nbsp; But that system is at
+the same time deficient in a means of making this benevolence of invariable
+operation.&nbsp; To reconcile this to the recognised character of the
+Deity, it is necessary to suppose that the present system is but a part
+of a whole, a stage in a Great Progress, and that the Redress is in
+reserve.&nbsp; Another argument here occurs - the economy of nature,
+beautifully arranged and vast in its extent as it is, does not satisfy
+even man&rsquo;s idea of what might be; he feels that, if this multiplicity
+of theatres for the exemplification of such phenomena as we see on earth
+were to go on for ever unchanged, it would not be worthy of the Being
+capable of creating it.&nbsp; An endless monotony of human generations,
+with their humble thinkings and doings, seems an object beneath that
+august Being.&nbsp; But the mundane economy might be very well as a
+portion of some greater phenomenon, the rest of which was yet to be
+evolved.&nbsp; It therefore appears that our system, though it may at
+first appear at issue with other doctrines in esteem amongst mankind,
+tends to come into harmony with them, and even to give them support.&nbsp;
+I would say, in conclusion, that, even where the two above arguments
+may fail of effect, there may yet be a faith derived from this view
+of nature sufficient to sustain us under all sense of the imperfect
+happiness, the calamities, the woes, and pains of this sphere of being.&nbsp;
+For let us but fully and truly consider what a system is here laid open
+to view, and we cannot well doubt that we are in the hands of One who
+is both able and willing to do us the most entire justice.&nbsp; And
+in this faith we may well rest at ease, even though life should have
+been to us but a protracted disease, or though every hope we had built
+on the secular materials within our reach were felt to be melting from
+our grasp.&nbsp; Thinking of all the contingencies of this world as
+to be in time melted into or lost in the greater system, to which the
+present is only subsidiary, let us wait the end with patience, and be
+of good cheer.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<h2>NOTE CONCLUSORY.</h2>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>Thus ends a book, composed in solitude, and almost without the cognizance
+of a single human being, for the sole purpose (or as nearly so as may
+be) of improving the knowledge of mankind, and through that medium their
+happiness.&nbsp; For reasons which need not be specified, the author&rsquo;s
+name is retained in its original obscurity, and, in all probability,
+will never be generally known.&nbsp; I do not expect that any word of
+praise which the work may elicit shall ever be responded to by me; or
+that any word of censure shall ever be parried or deprecated.&nbsp;
+It goes forth to take its chance of instant oblivion, or of a long and
+active course of usefulness in the world.&nbsp; Neither contingency
+can be of any importance to me, beyond the regret or the satisfaction
+which may be imparted by my sense of a lost or a realized benefit to
+my fellow-creatures.&nbsp; The book, as far as I am aware, is the first
+attempt to connect the natural sciences into a history of creation.&nbsp;
+The idea is a bold one, and there are many circumstances of time and
+place to render its boldness more than usually conspicuous.&nbsp; But
+I believe my doctrines to be in the main true; I believe all truth to
+be valuable, and its dissemination a blessing.&nbsp; At the same time,
+I hold myself duly sensible of the common liability to error, but am
+certain that no error in this line has the least chance of being allowed
+to injure the public mind.&nbsp; Therefore I publish.&nbsp; My views,
+if correct, will most assuredly stand, and may sooner or later prove
+beneficial; if otherwise, they will as surely pass out of notice without
+doing any harm.</p>
+<p>My sincere desire in the composition of the book was to give the
+true view of the history of nature, with as little disturbance as possible
+to existing beliefs, whether philosophical or religious.&nbsp; I have
+made little reference to any doctrines of the latter kind which may
+be thought inconsistent with mine, because to do so would have been
+to enter upon questions for the settlement of which our knowledge is
+not yet ripe.&nbsp; Let the reconciliation of whatever is true in my
+views with whatever is true in other systems come about in the fulness
+of calm and careful inquiry.&nbsp; I cannot but here remind the reader
+of what Dr. Wiseman has shewn so strikingly in his lectures, how different
+new philosophic doctrines are apt to appear after we have become somewhat
+familiar with them.&nbsp; Geology at first seems inconsistent with the
+authority of the Mosaic record.&nbsp; A storm of unreasoning indignation
+rises against its teachers.&nbsp; In time, its truths, being found quite
+irresistible, are admitted, and mankind continue to regard the Scriptures
+with the same respect as before.&nbsp; So also with several other sciences.&nbsp;
+Now the only objection that can be made on such ground to this book,
+is, that it brings forward some new hypotheses, at first sight, like
+geology, not in perfect harmony with that record, and arranges all the
+rest into a system which partakes of the same character.&nbsp; But may
+not the sacred text, on a liberal interpretation, or with the benefit
+of new light reflected from nature, or derived from learning, be shewn
+to be as much in harmony with the novelties of this volume as it has
+been with geology and natural philosophy?&nbsp; What is there in the
+laws of organic creation more startling to the candid theologian than
+in the Copernican system or the natural formation of strata?&nbsp; And
+if the whole series of facts is true, why should we shrink from inferences
+legitimately flowing from it?&nbsp; Is it not a wiser course, since
+reconciliation has come in so many instances, still to hope for it,
+still to go on with our new truths, trusting that they also will in
+time be found harmonious with all others?&nbsp; Thus we avoid the damage
+which the very appearance of an opposition to natural truth is calculated
+to inflict on any system presumed to require such support.&nbsp; Thus
+we give, as is meet, a respectful reception to what is revealed through
+the medium of nature, at the same time that we fully reserve our reverence
+for all we have been accustomed to hold sacred, not one tittle of which
+it may ultimately be found necessary to alter.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines2"><br /><br /></div>
+<p>Footnotes:</p>
+<p><a name="footnote3"></a><a href="#citation3">{3}</a>&nbsp; By Mr.
+Henderson, Professor of Astronomy in the Edinburgh University, and Lieutenant
+Meadows.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote5"></a><a href="#citation5">{5}</a>&nbsp; Made by
+M. Argelander, late director of the Observatory at Abo.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote6"></a><a href="#citation6">{6}</a>&nbsp; Professor
+Mossotti, on the Constitution of the Sidereal System, of which the Sun
+forms a part. - <i>London</i>, <i>Edinburgh</i>, <i>and Dublin Philosophical
+Magazine</i>, February, 1843.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote9"></a><a href="#citation9">{9}</a>&nbsp; The orbitual
+revolutions of the satellites of Uranus have not as yet been clearly
+scanned.&nbsp; It has been thought that their path is retrograde compared
+with the rest.&nbsp; Perhaps this may be owing to a <i>bouleversement</i>
+of the primary, for the inclination of its equator to the ecliptic is
+admitted to be unusually high; but the subject is altogether so obscure,
+that nothing can be founded on it.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote12"></a><a href="#citation12">{12}</a>&nbsp; Astronomy,
+Lardner&rsquo;s Cyclop&aelig;dia.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote17"></a><a href="#citation17">{17}</a>&nbsp; M.
+Compte combined Huygens&rsquo;s theorems for the measure of centrifugal
+force with the law of gravitation, and thus formed a simple fundamental
+equation between the duration of the rotation of what he calls the producing
+star, and the distance of the star produced.&nbsp; The constants of
+this equation were the radius of the central star, and the intensity
+of gravity at its surface, which is a direct consequence of its mass.&nbsp;
+It leads directly to the third law of Kepler, which thus becomes susceptible
+of being conceived <i>&agrave; priori</i> in a cosmogonical point of
+view.&nbsp; M. Compte first applied it to the moon, and found, to his
+great delight, that the periodic time of that satellite agrees within
+an hour or two with the duration which the revolution of the earth ought
+to have had at the time when the lunar distance formed the limit of
+the earth&rsquo;s atmosphere.&nbsp; He found the coincidence less exact,
+but still very striking in every other case.&nbsp; In those of the planets
+he obtained for the duration of the corresponding solar rotations a
+value always a little less than their actual periodic times.&nbsp; &ldquo;It
+is remarkable,&rdquo; says he, &ldquo;that this difference, though increasing
+as the planet is more distant, preserves very nearly the same relation
+to the corresponding periodic time, of which it commonly forms the forty-fifth
+part,&rdquo; - shewing, we may suppose, that only some small elements
+of the question had been overlooked by the calculator.&nbsp; The defect
+changes to an excess in the different systems of the satellites, where
+it is proportionally greater than in the planets, and unequal in the
+different systems.&nbsp; &ldquo;From the whole of these comparisons,&rdquo;
+says he, &ldquo;I deduced the following general result: - Supposing
+the mathematical limit of the solar atmosphere successively extended
+to the regions where the different planets are now found, the duration
+of the sun&rsquo;s rotation was, at each of these epochs, sensibly equal
+to that of the actual sidereal revolution of the corresponding planet;
+and the same is true for each planetary atmosphere in relation to the
+different satellites.&rdquo; - <i>Cours de Philosophie Positif</i>.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote42"></a><a href="#citation42">{42}</a>&nbsp; The
+researches on this subject were conducted chiefly by the late Baron
+Fourier, perpetual secretary to the Academy of Sciences of Paris.&nbsp;
+See his <i>Th&eacute;orie Analytique de la Chaleur</i>.&nbsp; 1822.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote52"></a><a href="#citation52">{52}</a>&nbsp; Delabeche&rsquo;s
+Geological Researches.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote60"></a><a href="#citation60">{60}</a>&nbsp; In
+the Cumbrian limestone occur &ldquo;calamopor&aelig;, lithodendra, cyathophylla,
+and orbicula.&rdquo; - <i>Philips</i>.&nbsp; The asaphus and trinucleus
+(crustacea) have been found respectively in the slate rocks of Wales,
+and the limestone beds of the grawacke group in Bohemia.&nbsp; That
+fragments of crinoidea, though of no determinate species, occur in this
+system, we have the authority of Mr. Murchison. - <i>Silurian System</i>,
+p. 710.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote62"></a><a href="#citation62">{62}</a>&nbsp; Such
+as amphioxus and myxene.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote64"></a><a href="#citation64">{64}</a>&nbsp; Miller&rsquo;s
+&ldquo;New Walks in an Old Field.&rdquo;</p>
+<p><a name="footnote68"></a><a href="#citation68">{68}</a>&nbsp; June,
+1842.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote84a"></a><a href="#citation84a">{84a}</a>&nbsp;
+The principal families are named sphenopteris, neuropteris, and pecopteris.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote84b"></a><a href="#citation84b">{84b}</a>&nbsp;
+A specimen from Bengal, in the staircase of the British Museum, is forty-five
+feet high.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote93"></a><a href="#citation93">{93}</a>&nbsp; &ldquo;Some
+of the most considerable dislocations of the border of the coal fields
+of Coalbrookdale and Dudley happened after the deposition of a part
+of the new red sandstone; but it is certain that those of Somersetshire
+and Gloucestershire were completed before the date of that rock.&rdquo;
+- <i>Philips.</i></p>
+<p><a name="footnote97"></a><a href="#citation97">{97}</a>&nbsp; The
+immediate effects of the slow respiration of the reptilia are, a low
+temperature in their bodies, and a slow consumption of food.&nbsp; Requiring
+little oxygen, they could have existed in an atmosphere containing a
+less proportion of that gas to carbonic acid gas than what now obtains.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote99"></a><a href="#citation99">{99}</a>&nbsp; The
+order to which frogs and toads belong.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote103"></a><a href="#citation103">{103}</a>&nbsp;
+Dr. Buckland, quoting an article by Professor Hitchcock, in the American
+Journal of Science and Arts, 1836.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote108a"></a><a href="#citation108a">{108a}</a>&nbsp;
+Murchison&rsquo;s Silurian System, p. 583.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote108b"></a><a href="#citation108b">{108b}</a> Buckland.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote110"></a><a href="#citation110">{110}</a>&nbsp;
+In some instances, these fossils are found with the contents of the
+stomach faithfully preserved, and even with pieces of the external skin.&nbsp;
+The pellets ejected by them (<i>coprolites</i>) are found in vast numbers,
+each generally enclosed in a nodule of ironstone, and sometimes shewing
+remains of the fishes which had formed their food.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote114"></a><a href="#citation114">{114}</a>&nbsp;
+De la Beche&rsquo;s Geological Researches, p. 344.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote127"></a><a href="#citation127">{127}</a>&nbsp;
+Thick-skinned animals.&nbsp; This term has been given by Cuvier to an
+order in which the hog, elephant, horse, and rhinoceros are included.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote149"></a><a href="#citation149">{149}</a>&nbsp;
+Intervals in the series were numerous in the department of the pachydermata;
+many of these gaps are now filled up from the extinct genera found in
+the tertiary formation.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote151"></a><a href="#citation151">{151}</a>&nbsp;
+See paper by Professor Edward Forbes, read to the British Association,
+1839.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote159"></a><a href="#citation159">{159}</a>&nbsp;
+Macculloch on the Attributes of the Deity, iii. 569.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote166"></a><a href="#citation166">{166}</a>&nbsp;
+&ldquo;A glass tube is to be bent into a syphon, and placed with the
+curve downwards, and in the bend is to be placed a small portion of
+mercury, not sufficient to close the connexion between the two legs;
+a solution of nitrate of silver is then to be introduced until it rises
+in both limbs of the tube.&nbsp; The precipitation of the mercury, in
+the form of an Arbor Dian&aelig;, will then take place, slowly, only
+when the syphon is placed in a plane perpendicular to the magnetic meridian;
+but if it be placed in a plane coinciding with the magnetic meridian,
+the action is rapid, and the crystallization particularly beautiful,
+taking place principally in that branch of the syphon towards the north.&nbsp;
+If the syphon be placed in a plane perpendicular to the magnetic meridian,
+and a strong magnet brought near it, the precipitation will commence
+in a short time, and be most copious in the branch of the syphon nearest
+to the south pole of the magnet.&rdquo;</p>
+<p><a name="footnote169a"></a><a href="#citation169a">{169a}</a>&nbsp;
+Fatty matter has also been formed in the laboratory.&nbsp; The process
+consisted in passing a mixture of carbonic acid, pure hydrogen, and
+carburetted hydrogen, in the proportion of one measure of the first,
+twenty of the second, and ten of the third, through a red-hot tube.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote169b"></a><a href="#citation169b">{169b}</a>&nbsp;
+Supplement to the Atomic Theory.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote170"></a><a href="#citation170">{170}</a>&nbsp;
+Carpenter on Life; Todd&rsquo;s Cyclop&aelig;dia of Physiology.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote171"></a><a href="#citation171">{171}</a>&nbsp;
+Carpenter&rsquo;s Report on the results obtained by the Microscope in
+the Study of Anatomy and Physiology, 1843.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote172"></a><a href="#citation172">{172}</a>&nbsp;
+See Dr. Martin Barry on Fissiparous Generation; Jameson&rsquo;s Journal,
+Oct. 1843.&nbsp; Appearances precisely similar have been detected in
+the germs of the crustacea.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote175"></a><a href="#citation175">{175}</a>&nbsp;
+Mr. Leonard Horner and Sir David Brewster, on a substance resembling
+shell. - <i>Philosophical Transactions</i>, 1836.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote179a"></a><a href="#citation179a">{179a}</a>&nbsp;
+Dr. Allen Thomson, in the article <i>Generation</i>, in Todd&rsquo;s
+Cyclop&aelig;dia of Anatomy and Physiology.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote179b"></a><a href="#citation179b">{179b}</a>&nbsp;
+The term aboriginal is here suggested, as more correct than spontaneous,
+the one hitherto generally used.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote182"></a><a href="#citation182">{182}</a>&nbsp;
+Article &ldquo;Zoophytes,&rdquo; Encyclop&aelig;dia Britannica, 7th
+edition.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote187"></a><a href="#citation187">{187}</a>&nbsp;
+See a pamphlet circulated by Mr. Weekes, in 1842.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote195"></a><a href="#citation195">{195}</a>&nbsp;
+Daubenton established the rule, that all the viviparous quadrupeds have
+seven vertebr&aelig; in the neck.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote201"></a><a href="#citation201">{201}</a>&nbsp;
+Lord&rsquo;s Popular Physiology.&nbsp; It is to Tiedemann that we chiefly
+owe these curious observations; but ground was first broken in this
+branch of physiological science by Dr. John Hunter.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote204"></a><a href="#citation204">{204}</a>&nbsp;
+When I formed this idea, I was not aware of one which seems faintly
+to foreshadow it - namely, Socrates&rsquo;s doctrine, afterwards dilated
+on by Plato, that &ldquo;previous to the existence of the world, and
+beyond its present limits, there existed certain archetypes, the embodiment
+(if we may use such a word) of general ideas; and that these archetypes
+were models, in imitation of which all particular beings were created.&rdquo;</p>
+<p><a name="footnote208"></a><a href="#citation208">{208}</a>&nbsp;
+The numbers 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, &amp;c. are formed by adding the
+successive terms of the series of natural numbers thus:</p>
+<p>1=1<br />1+2=3<br />1+2+3=6<br />l+2+3+4=10, &amp;c.&nbsp; They are
+called triangular numbers, because a number of points corresponding
+to any term can always be placed in the form of a triangle; for instance
+-</p>
+<p>.<br />1<br />.<br />..<br />3<br />.<br />..<br />...<br />6<br />.<br />..<br />...<br />....<br />10</p>
+<p><a name="footnote215"></a><a href="#citation215">{215}</a>&nbsp;
+Kirby and Spence.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote221"></a><a href="#citation221">{221}</a>&nbsp;
+See an article by Dr. Weissenborn, in the New Series of &ldquo;Magazine
+of Natural History,&rdquo; vol. i. p. 574.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote224"></a><a href="#citation224">{224}</a>&nbsp;
+&ldquo;It is a fact of the highest interest and moment that as the brain
+of every tribe of animals appears to pass, during its development, in
+succession through the types of all those below it, so the brain of
+man passes through the types of those of every tribe in the creation.&nbsp;
+It represents, accordingly, before the second month of utero-gestation,
+that of an avertebrated animal; at the second month, that of an osseous
+fish; at the third, that of a turtle; at the fourth, that of a bird;
+at the fifth, that of one of the rodentia; at the sixth, that of one
+of the ruminantia; at the seventh, that of one of the digitigrada; at
+the eighth, that of one of the quadrumana; till at length, at the ninth,
+it compasses the brain of Man!&nbsp; It is hardly necessary to say,
+that all this is only an approximation to the truth; since neither is
+the brain of all osseous fishes, of all turtles, of all birds, nor of
+all the species of any one of the above order of mammals, by any means
+precisely the same, nor does the brain of the human f&oelig;tus at any
+time precisely resemble, perhaps, that of any individual whatever among
+the lower animals.&nbsp; Nevertheless, it may be said to represent,
+at each of the above-mentioned periods, the aggregate, as it were, of
+the brains of each of the tribes stated; consisting as it does, about
+the second month, chiefly of the mesial parts of the cerebellum, the
+corpora quadrigemina, thalami optici, rudiments of the hemispheres of
+the cerebrum and corpora striata; and receiving in succession, at the
+third, the rudiments of the lobes of the cerebrum; at the fourth, those
+of the fornix, corpus callosum, and septum lucidum; at the fifth, the
+tubor annulare, and so forth; the posterior lobes of the cerebrum increasing
+from before to behind, so as to cover the thalami optici about the fourth
+month, the corpora quadrigemina about the sixth, and the cerebellum
+about the seventh.&nbsp; This, then, is another example of an increase
+in the complexity of an organ succeeding its centralization; as if Nature,
+having first piled up her materials in one spot, delighted afterwards
+to employ her abundance, not so much in enlarging old parts as in forming
+new ones upon the old foundations, and thus adding to the complexity
+of a fabric, the rudimental structure of which is in all animals equally
+simple.&rdquo; - <i>Fletcher&rsquo;s Rudiments of Physiology.</i></p>
+<p><a name="footnote226"></a><a href="#citation226">{226}</a>&nbsp;
+[Gutenberg note: the table in the book is very wide.&nbsp; Since it
+won&rsquo;t fit within the normal Gutenberg margins, and cannot be reproduced
+typographically, the rows of the table have been broken out as follows.]</p>
+<p><a name="footnote229"></a><a href="#citation229">{229}</a>&nbsp;
+Some poor people having taken up their abode in the cells under the
+fortifications of Lisle, the proportion of defective infants produced
+by them became so great, that it was deemed necessary to issue an order
+commanding these cells to be shut up.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote232"></a><a href="#citation232">{232}</a>&nbsp;
+These affinities and analogies are explained in the next chapter.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote239a"></a><a href="#citation239a">{239a}</a>&nbsp;
+Corresponding to the articulata of Cuvier.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote239b"></a><a href="#citation239b">{239b}</a>&nbsp;
+A new sub-kingdom, made out of part of the radiata of Cuvier.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote239c"></a><a href="#citation239c">{239c}</a>&nbsp;
+This is a newly applied term, the reasons for which will be explained
+in the sequel.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote242"></a><a href="#citation242">{242}</a>&nbsp;
+This is preferred to grallatorial, as more comprehensively descriptive.&nbsp;
+There is the same need for a substitute for rasorial, which is only
+applicable to birds.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote246"></a><a href="#citation246">{246}</a>&nbsp;
+Distribution and Classification of Animals, p. 248.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote255"></a><a href="#citation255">{255}</a>&nbsp;
+Researches, 4th edition, i. 95.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote257"></a><a href="#citation257">{257}</a>&nbsp;
+Prichard.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote266"></a><a href="#citation266">{266}</a>&nbsp;
+Mr. Swainson&rsquo;s arguments about the entireness of the circle simiad&aelig;
+are only too rigid, for fossil geology has since added new genera to
+this group and the cebid&aelig;, and there may be still farther additions.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote270"></a><a href="#citation270">{270}</a>&nbsp;
+See Wilson&rsquo;s American Ornithology; article, <i>Fishing Crow.</i></p>
+<p><a name="footnote274"></a><a href="#citation274">{274}</a>&nbsp;
+[Gutenberg note: in the diagram the triangles extending from the 1,2,3,4
+and the a,b,c,d meet at the same point - the line from the 1,2,3,4 being
+at around 45&deg; and the line from the a,b,c,d being at around 60&deg;.&nbsp;
+It isn&rsquo;t possible to reproduce this using normal characters.&nbsp;
+Despite what the text says there is no line labelled 5 in the diagram.
+- DP]</p>
+<p><a name="footnote278"></a><a href="#citation278">{278}</a>&nbsp;
+See Dr. Prichard&rsquo;s Researches into the Physical History of Man.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote280"></a><a href="#citation280">{280}</a>&nbsp;
+Buckingham&rsquo;s Travels among the Arabs.&nbsp; This fact is the more
+valuable to the argument, as having been set down with no regard to
+any kind of hypothesis.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote287"></a><a href="#citation287">{287}</a>&nbsp;
+Wiseman&rsquo;s Lectures on the Connexion between Science and Revealed
+Religion, i. 44.&nbsp; The Celtic has been established as a member or
+group of the Indo-European family, by the work of Dr. Prichard, <i>on
+the Eastern Origin of the Celtic Nations</i>.&nbsp; &ldquo;First,&rdquo;
+says Dr. Wiseman, &ldquo;he has examined the lexical resemblances, and
+shewn that the primary and most simple words are the same in both, as
+well as the numerals and elementary verbal roots.&nbsp; Then follows
+a minute analysis of the verb, directed to shew its analogies with other
+languages, and they are such as manifest no casual coincidence, but
+an internal structure radically the same.&nbsp; The verb substantive,
+which is minutely analysed, presents more striking analogies to the
+Persian verb than perhaps any other language of the family.&nbsp; But
+Celtic is not thus become a mere member of this confederacy, but has
+brought to it most important aid; for, from it alone can be satisfactorily
+explained some of the conjugational endings in the other languages.&nbsp;
+For instance, the third person plural of the Latin, Persian, Greek,
+and Sanscrit ends in nt, nd, &nu;&tau;&iota;, &nu;&tau;&omicron;, nti,
+or nt.&nbsp; Now, supposing, with most grammarians, that the inflexions
+arose from the pronouns of the respective persons, it is only in Celtic
+that we find a pronoun that can explain this termination; for there,
+too, the same person ends in nt, and thus corresponds exactly, as do
+the others, with its pronoun, <i>hwynt</i>, or <i>ynt</i>.&rdquo;</p>
+<p><a name="footnote291"></a><a href="#citation291">{291}</a>&nbsp;
+Schoolcraft.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote293"></a><a href="#citation293">{293}</a>&nbsp;
+Views of the Cordilleras.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote302"></a><a href="#citation302">{302}</a>&nbsp;
+The problem of Chinese civilization, such as it is - so puzzling when
+we consider that they are only, as will be presently seen, the child
+race of mankind - is solved when we look to geographical position producing
+fixity of residence and density of population.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote307a"></a><a href="#citation307a">{307a}</a>&nbsp;
+Lord&rsquo;s Popular Physiology, explaining observations by M. Serres.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote307b"></a><a href="#citation307b">{307b}</a>&nbsp;
+Conformably to this view, the beard, that peculiar attribute of maturity,
+is scanty in the Mongolian, and scarcely exists in the Americans and
+Negroes.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote309"></a><a href="#citation309">{309}</a>&nbsp;
+Of this we have perhaps an illustration in the peculiarities which distinguish
+the Arabs residing in the valley of the Jordan.&nbsp; They have flatter
+features, darker skins, and coarser hair than other tribes of their
+nation; and we have seen one instance of a thoroughly Negro family being
+born to an ordinary couple.&nbsp; It may be presumed that the conditions
+of the life of these people tend to arrest development.&nbsp; We thus
+see how an offshoot of the human family migrating at an early period
+into Africa, might in time, from subjection to similar influences, become
+Negroes.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote317"></a><a href="#citation317">{317}</a>&nbsp;
+Missionary Scenes and Labours in South Africa.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote326"></a><a href="#citation326">{326}</a>&nbsp;
+&ldquo;Is not God the first cause of matter as well as of mind?&nbsp;
+Do not the first attributes of matter lie as inscrutable in the bosom
+of God - of its first author - as those of mind?&nbsp; Has not even
+matter confessedly received from God the power of experiencing, in consequence
+of impressions from the earlier modifications of matter, certain consciousnesses
+called sensations of the same?&nbsp; Is not, therefore, the wonder of
+matter also receiving the consciousnesses of other matter called ideas
+of the mind a wonder more flowing out of and in analogy with all former
+wonders, than would be, on the contrary, the wonder of this faculty
+of the mind not flowing out of any faculties of matter?&nbsp; Is it
+not a wonder which, so far from destroying our hopes of immortality,
+can establish that doctrine on a train of inferences and inductions
+more firmly established and more connected with each other than the
+former belief can be, as soon as we have proved that matter is not perishable,
+but is only liable to successive combinations and decombinations.</p>
+<p>&ldquo;Can we look farther back one way into the first origin of
+matter than we can look forward the other way into the last developments
+of mind?&nbsp; Can we say that God has not in matter itself laid the
+seeds of every faculty of mind, rather than that he has made the first
+principle of mind entirely distinct from that of matter?&nbsp; Cannot
+the first cause of all we see and know have <i>fraught matter itself</i>,
+<i>from its very beginning</i>, <i>with all the attributes necessary
+to develop into mind</i>, as well as he can have from the first made
+the attributes of mind wholly different from those of matter, only in
+order afterwards, by an imperceptible and incomprehensible link, to
+join the two together?</p>
+<p>&ldquo; * * [The decombination of the matter on which mind rests]
+is this a reason why mind must be annihilated?&nbsp; Is the temporary
+reverting of the mind, and of the sense out of which that mind developes,
+to their original component elements, a reason for thinking that they
+cannot again at another later period, and in another higher globe, be
+again recombined, and with more splendour than before? * * The New Testament
+does not after death here promise us a soul hereafter unconnected with
+matter, and which has no connexion with our present mind - a soul independent
+of time and space.&nbsp; That is a fanciful idea, not founded on its
+expressions, when taken in their just and real meaning.&nbsp; On the
+contrary, it promises us a mind like the present, founded on time and
+space; since it is, like the present, to hold a certain situation in
+time, and a certain locality in space.&nbsp; But it promises a mind
+situated in portions of time and of space different from the present;
+a mind composed of elements of matter more extended, more perfect, and
+more glorious: a mind which, formed of materials supplied by different
+globes, is consequently able to see farther into the past, and to think
+farther into the future, than any mind here existing: a mind which,
+freed from the partial and uneven combination incidental to it on this
+globe, will be exempt from the changes for evil to which, on the present
+globe, mind as well as matter is liable, and will only thenceforth experience
+the changes for the better which matter, more justly poised, will alone
+continue to experience: a mind which, no longer fearing the death, the
+total decomposition, to which it is subject on this globe, will thenceforth
+continue last and immortal.&rdquo; - HOPE, <i>on the Origin and Prospects
+of Man</i>, 1831.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote331"></a><a href="#citation331">{331}</a>&nbsp;
+Dublin Review, Aug. 1840.&nbsp; The Guarantee Society has since been
+established, and is likely to become a useful and prosperous institution.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote333"></a><a href="#citation333">{333}</a>&nbsp;
+The ray, which is considered the lowest in the scale of fishes, or next
+to the crustaceans, gives the first faint representation of a brain
+in certain scanty and medullary masses, which appear as merely composed
+of enlarged origins of the nerves.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote335"></a><a href="#citation335">{335}</a>&nbsp;
+If mental action is electric, the proverbial quickness of thought -
+that is, the quickness of the transmission of sensation and will - may
+be presumed to have been brought to an exact measurement.&nbsp; The
+speed of light has long been known to be about 192,000 miles per second,
+and the experiments of Wheatstone have shewn that the electric agent
+travels (if I may so speak) at the same rate, thus shewing a likelihood
+that one law rules the movements of all the &ldquo;imponderable bodies.&rdquo;&nbsp;
+Mental action may accordingly be presumed to have a rapidity equal to
+one hundred and ninety-two thousand miles in the second - a rate evidently
+far beyond what is necessary to make the design and execution of any
+of our ordinary muscular movements apparently identical in point of
+time, which they are.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote346"></a><a href="#citation346">{346}</a>&nbsp;
+Phrenological Journal, xv. 338.</p>
+<p><a name="footnote347"></a><a href="#citation347">{347}</a>&nbsp;
+A pampered lap-dog, living where there is another of its own species,
+will hide any nice morsel which it cannot eat, under a rug, or in some
+other by-place, designing to enjoy it afterwards.&nbsp; I have seen
+children do the same thing.</p>
+<div class="GutenbergBlankLines3"><br /><br /><br /></div>
+<p>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK, VESTIGES OF CREATION ***</p>
+<pre>
+
+******This file should be named vstc10h.htm or vstc10h.zip******
+Corrected EDITIONS of our EBooks get a new NUMBER, vstc11h.htm
+VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, vstc10ah.htm
+
+Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US
+unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we usually do not
+keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
+
+We are now trying to release all our eBooks one year in advance
+of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing.
+Please be encouraged to tell us about any error or corrections,
+even years after the official publication date.
+
+Please note neither this listing nor its contents are final til
+midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
+The official release date of all Project Gutenberg eBooks is at
+Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A
+preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
+and editing by those who wish to do so.
+
+Most people start at our Web sites at:
+http://gutenberg.net or
+http://promo.net/pg
+
+These Web sites include award-winning information about Project
+Gutenberg, including how to donate, how to help produce our new
+eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter (free!).
+
+
+Those of you who want to download any eBook before announcement
+can get to them as follows, and just download by date. This is
+also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the
+indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an
+announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter.
+
+http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext04 or
+ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext04
+
+Or /etext03, 02, 01, 00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90
+
+Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want,
+as it appears in our Newsletters.
+
+
+Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)
+
+We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The
+time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours
+to get any eBook selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
+searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. Our
+projected audience is one hundred million readers. If the value
+per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
+million dollars per hour in 2002 as we release over 100 new text
+files per month: 1240 more eBooks in 2001 for a total of 4000+
+We are already on our way to trying for 2000 more eBooks in 2002
+If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total
+will reach over half a trillion eBooks given away by year's end.
+
+The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away 1 Trillion eBooks!
+This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
+which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users.
+
+Here is the briefest record of our progress (* means estimated):
+
+eBooks Year Month
+
+ 1 1971 July
+ 10 1991 January
+ 100 1994 January
+ 1000 1997 August
+ 1500 1998 October
+ 2000 1999 December
+ 2500 2000 December
+ 3000 2001 November
+ 4000 2001 October/November
+ 6000 2002 December*
+ 9000 2003 November*
+10000 2004 January*
+
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been created
+to secure a future for Project Gutenberg into the next millennium.
+
+We need your donations more than ever!
+
+As of February, 2002, contributions are being solicited from people
+and organizations in: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut,
+Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois,
+Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts,
+Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New
+Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
+Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South
+Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West
+Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
+
+We have filed in all 50 states now, but these are the only ones
+that have responded.
+
+As the requirements for other states are met, additions to this list
+will be made and fund raising will begin in the additional states.
+Please feel free to ask to check the status of your state.
+
+In answer to various questions we have received on this:
+
+We are constantly working on finishing the paperwork to legally
+request donations in all 50 states. If your state is not listed and
+you would like to know if we have added it since the list you have,
+just ask.
+
+While we cannot solicit donations from people in states where we are
+not yet registered, we know of no prohibition against accepting
+donations from donors in these states who approach us with an offer to
+donate.
+
+International donations are accepted, but we don't know ANYTHING about
+how to make them tax-deductible, or even if they CAN be made
+deductible, and don't have the staff to handle it even if there are
+ways.
+
+Donations by check or money order may be sent to:
+
+Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+PMB 113
+1739 University Ave.
+Oxford, MS 38655-4109
+
+Contact us if you want to arrange for a wire transfer or payment
+method other than by check or money order.
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been approved by
+the US Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) organization with EIN
+[Employee Identification Number] 64-622154. Donations are
+tax-deductible to the maximum extent permitted by law. As fund-raising
+requirements for other states are met, additions to this list will be
+made and fund-raising will begin in the additional states.
+
+We need your donations more than ever!
+
+You can get up to date donation information online at:
+
+http://www.gutenberg.net/donation.html
+
+
+***
+
+If you can't reach Project Gutenberg,
+you can always email directly to:
+
+Michael S. Hart hart@pobox.com
+
+Prof. Hart will answer or forward your message.
+
+We would prefer to send you information by email.
+
+
+**The Legal Small Print**
+
+
+(Three Pages)
+
+***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS**START***
+Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
+They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
+your copy of this eBook, even if you got it for free from
+someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
+fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement
+disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how
+you may distribute copies of this eBook if you want to.
+
+*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS EBOOK
+By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
+eBook, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept
+this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive
+a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this eBook by
+sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person
+you got it from. If you received this eBook on a physical
+medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request.
+
+ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM EBOOKS
+This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBooks,
+is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart
+through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project").
+Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright
+on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and
+distribute it in the United States without permission and
+without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth
+below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this eBook
+under the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark.
+
+Please do not use the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark to market
+any commercial products without permission.
+
+To create these eBooks, the Project expends considerable
+efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain
+works. Despite these efforts, the Project's eBooks and any
+medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other
+things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or
+corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
+intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged
+disk or other eBook medium, a computer virus, or computer
+codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
+
+LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES
+But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below,
+[1] Michael Hart and the Foundation (and any other party you may
+receive this eBook from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook) disclaims
+all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including
+legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR
+UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT,
+INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
+OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE
+POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
+
+If you discover a Defect in this eBook within 90 days of
+receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any)
+you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that
+time to the person you received it from. If you received it
+on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and
+such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement
+copy. If you received it electronically, such person may
+choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to
+receive it electronically.
+
+THIS EBOOK IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER
+WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS
+TO THE EBOOK OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
+PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or
+the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the
+above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you
+may have other legal rights.
+
+INDEMNITY
+You will indemnify and hold Michael Hart, the Foundation,
+and its trustees and agents, and any volunteers associated
+with the production and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
+texts harmless, from all liability, cost and expense, including
+legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the
+following that you do or cause: [1] distribution of this eBook,
+[2] alteration, modification, or addition to the eBook,
+or [3] any Defect.
+
+DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm"
+You may distribute copies of this eBook electronically, or by
+disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this
+"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg,
+or:
+
+[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this
+ requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the
+ eBook or this "small print!" statement. You may however,
+ if you wish, distribute this eBook in machine readable
+ binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form,
+ including any form resulting from conversion by word
+ processing or hypertext software, but only so long as
+ *EITHER*:
+
+ [*] The eBook, when displayed, is clearly readable, and
+ does *not* contain characters other than those
+ intended by the author of the work, although tilde
+ (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may
+ be used to convey punctuation intended by the
+ author, and additional characters may be used to
+ indicate hypertext links; OR
+
+ [*] The eBook may be readily converted by the reader at
+ no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent
+ form by the program that displays the eBook (as is
+ the case, for instance, with most word processors);
+ OR
+
+ [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at
+ no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the
+ eBook in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC
+ or other equivalent proprietary form).
+
+[2] Honor the eBook refund and replacement provisions of this
+ "Small Print!" statement.
+
+[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Foundation of 20% of the
+ gross profits you derive calculated using the method you
+ already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you
+ don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are
+ payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation"
+ the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were
+ legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent
+ periodic) tax return. Please contact us beforehand to
+ let us know your plans and to work out the details.
+
+WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO?
+Project Gutenberg is dedicated to increasing the number of
+public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed
+in machine readable form.
+
+The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time,
+public domain materials, or royalty free copyright licenses.
+Money should be paid to the:
+"Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
+
+If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or
+software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at:
+hart@pobox.com
+
+[Portions of this eBook's header and trailer may be reprinted only
+when distributed free of all fees. Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 by
+Michael S. Hart. Project Gutenberg is a TradeMark and may not be
+used in any sales of Project Gutenberg eBooks or other materials be
+they hardware or software or any other related product without
+express permission.]
+
+*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS*Ver.02/11/02*END*
+</pre></body>
+</html>