summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/orig7140-h/p2.htm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:29:02 -0700
committerRoger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org>2025-10-15 05:29:02 -0700
commita96d70fb5bd81eb9df76afee807b6318cc08e775 (patch)
tree3d74938e266442b8b26507eb7d5facd62691551a /old/orig7140-h/p2.htm
initial commit of ebook 7140HEADmain
Diffstat (limited to 'old/orig7140-h/p2.htm')
-rw-r--r--old/orig7140-h/p2.htm4622
1 files changed, 4622 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/orig7140-h/p2.htm b/old/orig7140-h/p2.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..45f68fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/orig7140-h/p2.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,4622 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
+<html>
+<head>
+<title>THE GREAT CONSPIRACY, Part 2</title>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
+
+
+<style type="text/css">
+ <!--
+ body {background:#faebd7; margin:10%; text-align:justify}
+ P {
+ text-indent: 1em;
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ margin-bottom: .75em; }
+ H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; }
+ HR { width: 33%; text-align: center; }
+ blockquote {font-size: 95% }
+ .figleft {float: left;}
+ .figright {float: right;}
+ .toc { margin-left: 15%; margin-bottom: 0em;}
+ CENTER { padding: 10px;}
+ // -->
+</style>
+
+
+</head>
+<body>
+
+<h2>THE GREAT CONSPIRACY, Part 2</h2>
+
+
+<center>
+<table summary="" cellPadding=4 border=3>
+<tr><td>
+
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="p1.htm">Previous Part</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</td><td>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7140-h.htm">Main Index</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</td><td>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="p3.htm">Next Part</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+
+</td></tr>
+</table>
+</center>
+
+
+<br><br><br><br><br><br>
+
+
+
+<h1> THE GREAT CONSPIRACY</h1>
+<br>
+ <h2>Its Origin and History</h2>
+ <br>
+ <h3>By</h3>
+ <br>
+ <h1>John Logan</h1>
+<br><br>
+ <h2> Part 2.</h2>
+<br>
+<br>
+
+<br><br><br><br>
+<center>
+<img alt="titlepage.jpg (65K)" src="images/titlepage.jpg" height="1134" width="692">
+<br><br><br><br>
+<img alt="frontspiece.jpg (101K)" src="images/frontspiece.jpg" height="934" width="665">
+</center>
+
+<br><br><br><br>
+
+<h2>
+<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+ CONTENTS</h2>
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch6">CHAPTER VI.</a><br>
+ THE GREAT CONSPIRACY MATURING.</h2>
+<br>
+LINCOLN'S ELECTION ASSURED&mdash;SOUTHERN EXULTATION&mdash;NORTHERN GLOOM&mdash;"FIRING
+THE SOUTHERN HEART"&mdash;RESIGNATIONS OF FEDERAL OFFICERS AND SENATORS OF
+SOUTH CAROLINA&mdash;GOVERNOR BROWN, OF GEORGIA, DEFIES "FEDERAL
+COERCION"&mdash;ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS'S ARGUMENT AGAINST SECESSION&mdash;SOUTH CAROLINA
+CALLS AN "UNCONDITIONAL SECESSION CONVENTION"&mdash;THE CALL SETS THE SOUTH
+ABLAZE&mdash;PROCLAMATIONS OF THE GOVERNORS OF THE SOUTHERN STATES, FAVORING
+REVOLT&mdash;LOYAL ADDRESS OF GOVERNOR MAGOFFIN OF KENTUCKY&mdash;THE CLAMOR OF
+REVOLT SILENCES APPEALS FOR UNION&mdash;PRESIDENT BUCHANAN'S PITIFUL
+WEAKNESS&mdash;CONSPIRATORS IN HIS CABINET&mdash;IMBECILITY OF HIS LAST ANNUAL
+MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, DEC., 1860&mdash;ATTORNEY-GENERAL JEREMIAH BLACK'S
+OPINION AGAINST COERCION&mdash;CONTRAST AFFORDED BY GENERAL JACKSON'S LOYAL
+LOGIC&mdash;ENSUING DEBATES IN CONGRESS&mdash;SETTLED PURPOSE OF THE CONSPIRATORS
+TO RESIST PLACATION&mdash;FUTILE LABORS OF UNION MEN IN CONGRESS FOR A
+PEACEFUL SOLUTION&mdash;ABSURD DEMANDS OF THE IMPLACABLES&mdash;THE COMMERCIAL
+NORTH ON ITS KNEES TO THE SOUTH&mdash;CONCILIATION ABJECTLY BEGGED
+FOR&mdash;BRUTAL SNEERS AT THE NORTH, AND THREATS OF CLINGMAN, IVERSON, AND OTHER
+SOUTHERN FIREEATERS, IN THE U. S. SENATE&mdash;THEIR BLUSTER MET BY STURDY
+REPUBLICANS&mdash;BEN WADE GALLANTLY STANDS BY THE "VERDICT OF THE
+PEOPLE"&mdash;PEACEFUL-SETTLEMENT PROPOSITIONS IN THE HOUSE&mdash;ADRIAN'S RESOLUTION, AND
+VOTE&mdash;LOVEJOY'S COUNTER-RESOLUTION, AND VOTE&mdash;ADOPTION OF MORRIS'S UNION
+RESOLUTION IN HOUSE<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch7">CHAPTER VII.</a><br>
+ SECESSION ARMING.<br></h2>
+<br>
+THE SOUTH CAROLINA SECESSION CONVENTION MEETS&mdash;SPEECHES AT "SECESSION
+HALL" OF PARKER, KEITT, INGLIS, BARNWELL, RHETT, AND GREGG, THE FIRST
+ORDINANCE OF SECESSION&mdash;ITS JUBILANT ADOPTION AND
+RATIFICATION&mdash;SECESSION STAMPEDE&mdash;A SOUTHERN CONGRESS PROPOSED&mdash;PICKENS'S PROCLAMATION
+OF SOVEREIGN INDEPENDENCE&mdash;SOUTH CAROLINA CONGRESSMEN
+WITHDRAW&mdash;DISSENSIONS IN BUCHANAN'S CABINET&mdash;COBB FLOYD, AND THOMPSON,
+DEMAND WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL TROOPS&mdash;BUCHANAN'S
+REPLY&mdash;SEIZURE OF FORTS, ETC.&mdash;THE "STAR OF THE WEST" FIRED ON&mdash;THE MAD
+RUSH OF REBELLIOUS EVENTS&mdash;SOUTH CAROLINA DEMANDS THE SURRENDER OF FORT
+SUMTER AND THE DEMAND REFUSED&mdash;SECRETARY HOLT'S LETTER TO CONSPIRING
+SENATORS AND REBEL AGENT&mdash;TROOP'S AT THE NATIONAL CAPITAL&mdash;HOLT'S
+REASONS THEREFOR&mdash;THE REVOLUTIONARY PROGRAMME&mdash;"ARMED OCCUPATION OF
+WASHINGTON CITY"&mdash;LINCOLN'S INAUGURATION TO BE PREVENTED&mdash;THE CRUMBLING
+AND DISSOLVING UNION&mdash;THE NORTH STANDS AGHAST&mdash;GREAT DEBATE IN CONGRESS,
+1860-1861&mdash;CLINGMAN ON THE SOUTHERN TARIFF-GRIEVANCE&mdash;DEFIANCE OF BROWN
+OF MISSISSIPPI&mdash;IVERSON'S BLOODY THREAT&mdash;WIGFALL'S UNSCRUPULOUS
+ADVICE&mdash;HIS INSULTING DEMANDS&mdash;BAKER'S GLORIOUSLY ELOQUENT RESPONSE&mdash;ANDY JOHNSON
+THREATENED WITH BULLETS&mdash;THE NORTH BULLIED&mdash;INSOLENT, IMPOSSIBLE TERMS OF
+PEACE&mdash;LINCOLN'S SPEECHES EN ROUTE FOR WASHINGTON&mdash;SAVE ARRIVAL&mdash;"I'LL
+TRY TO STEER HER THROUGH!"&mdash;THE SOUTH TAUNTS HIM&mdash;WIGFALL'S CHALLENGE
+TO THE BLOODY ISSUE OF ARMS!<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch8">CHAPTER VIII.</a><br>
+ THE REJECTED OLIVE BRANCH.</h2>
+<br>
+THE VARIOUS COMPROMISES OFFERED BY THE NORTH&mdash;"THE CRITTENDEN
+COMPROMISE"&mdash;THE PEACE CONFERENCE&mdash;COMPROMISE PROPOSITIONS OF THE
+SOUTHERN CONSPIRATORS&mdash;IRRECONCILABLE ATTITUDE OF THE PLOTTERS&mdash;HISTORY
+OF THE COMPROMISE MEASURES IN CONGRESS&mdash;CLARK'S SUBSTITUTE TO CRITTENDEN
+RESOLUTIONS IN THE SENATE&mdash;ANTHONY'S MORE THAN EQUITABLE
+PROPOSITIONS&mdash;HIS AFFECTING APPEAL TO STONY HEARTS&mdash;THE CONSPIRACY DEVELOPING&mdash;SIX
+SOUTHERN SENATORS REFUSE TO VOTE AGAINST THE CLARK SUBSTITUTE&mdash;ITS
+CONSEQUENT ADOPTION, AND DEFEAT OF THE CRITTENDEN RESOLUTIONS&mdash;LYING
+TELEGRAMS FROM CONSPIRING SENATORS TO FURTHER INFLAME
+REBELLION&mdash;SAULSBURY'S AFTERSTATEMENT (1862) AS TO CAUSES OF FAILURE OF
+CRITTENDEN'S COMPROMISE&mdash;LATHAM'S GRAPHIC PROOF OF THE CONSPIRATORS'
+"DELIBERATE, WILFUL DESIGN" TO KILL COMPROMISE&mdash;ANDREW JOHNSON'S
+EVIDENCE AS TO THEIR ULTIMATE OBJECT "PLACE AND EMOLUMENT FOR
+THEMSELVES"&mdash;"THE POWERS OF GOVERNMENT IN THE HANDS OF THE FEW"&mdash;THE
+CORWIN COMPROMISE RESOLUTION IN THE HOUSE&mdash;THE BURCH
+AMENDMENT&mdash;KELLOGG'S PROPOSITION&mdash;THE CLEMENS SUBSTITUTE&mdash;PASSAGE BY THE HOUSE OF
+CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROHIBITING CONGRESSIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH
+SLAVERY WHERE IT EXISTS&mdash;ITS ADOPTION BY THE SENATE&mdash;THE CLARK
+SUBSTITUTE RECONSIDERED AND DEFEATED&mdash;PROPOSITIONS OF THE PEACE CONGRESS
+LOST&mdash;REJECTION OF THE CRITTENDEN COMPROMISE<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch9">CHAPTER IX.</a><br>
+ SLAVERY'S SETTING AND FREEDOM'S DAWN.<br></h2>
+<br>
+THE LAST NIGHT OF THE 36TH CONGRESS&mdash;MR. CRITTENDEN'S PATRIOTIC
+APPEAL&mdash;"THE SADDEST SPECTACLE EVER SEEN"&mdash;IMPOTENCY OF THE BETRAYED AND FALLING
+STATE&mdash;DOUGLAS'S POWERFUL PLEA&mdash;PATRIOTISM OF HIMSELF AND
+SUPPORTERS&mdash;LOGAN SUMMARIZES THE COMPROMISES, AND APPEALS TO PATRIOTISM ABOVE
+PARTY&mdash;STATESMANLIKE BREADTH OF DOUGLAS, BAKER AND SEWARD&mdash;HENRY WINTER DAVIS
+ELOQUENTLY CONDENSES "THE SITUATION" IN A NUTSHELL&mdash;"THE FIRST FRUITS OF
+RECONCILIATION" OFFERED BY THE NORTH, SCORNED BY THE
+CONSPIRATORS&mdash;WIGFALL AGAIN SPEAKS AS THE MOUTHPIECE OF THE SOUTH&mdash;HE RAVES VIOLENTLY
+AT THE NORTH&mdash;THE SOUTH REJECTS PEACE "EITHER IN THE UNION, OR OUT OF
+IT"&mdash;THE DAWN OF FREEDOM APPEARS (MARCH 4TH, 1861)&mdash;INAUGURATION OF
+PRESIDENT LINCOLN&mdash;LINCOLN'S FIRST INAUGURAL&mdash;GRANDEUR AND PATHOS OF HIS
+PATRIOTIC UTTERANCES&mdash;HIS FIRST SLEEPLESS AND PRAYERFUL NIGHT AT THE
+WHITE HOUSE&mdash;THE MORROW, AND ITS BITTER DISAPPOINTMENT&mdash;THE MESSAGE OF
+"PEACE AND GOOD WILL" REGARDED AS A "CHALLENGE TO WAR"&mdash;PRESIDENT
+LINCOLN'S CABINET<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch10">CHAPTER X.</a><br>
+ THE WAR-DRUM&mdash;"ON TO WASHINGTON!"<br></h2>
+<br>
+REBEL COMMISSIONERS AT WASHINGTON ON A "MISSION"&mdash;SEWARD "SITS DOWN" ON
+THEM&mdash;HE REFUSES TO RECOGNIZE "CONFEDERATE STATES"&mdash;THE REBEL
+COMMISSIONERS "ACCEPT THE GAGE OF BATTLE THUS THROWN DOWN TO
+THEM"&mdash;ATTEMPT TO PROVISION FORT SUMTER&mdash;THE REBELS NOTIFIED&mdash;THE FORT AND ITS
+SURROUNDINGS&mdash;THE FIRST GUN OF SLAVERY FIRED&mdash;TERRIFIC BOMBARDMENT OF
+THE FORT&mdash;THE GARRISON, STARVED AND BURNED OUT, EVACUATES, WITH ALL THE
+HONORS OF WAR&mdash;THE SOUTH CRAZY WITH EXULTATION&mdash;TE DEUMS SUNG, SALUTES
+FIRED, AND THE REBEL GOVERNMENT SERENADED&mdash;"ON TO WASHINGTON!" THE
+REBEL CRY&mdash;"GRAY JACKETS OVER THE BORDER"&mdash;PRESIDENT LINCOLN'S FIRST
+PROCLAMATION AND CALL FOR TROOPS&mdash;INSULTING RESPONSES OF GOVERNORS
+BURTON, HICKS, LETCHER, ELLIS, MAGOFFIN, HARRIS, JACKSON AND
+RECTOR&mdash;LOYAL RESPONSES FROM GOVERNORS OF THE FREE STATES&mdash;MAGICAL EFFECT OF THE
+CALL UPON THE LOYAL NORTH&mdash;FEELING IN THE BORDER-STATES&mdash;PRESIDENT
+LINCOLN'S CLEAR SUMMARY OF THE SITUATION AND ITS PHILOSOPHY&mdash;HIS PLAIN
+DUTY&mdash;THE WAR POWER&mdash;THE NATIONAL CAPITAL CUT OFF&mdash;EVACUATION OF
+HARPER'S FERRY&mdash;LOYAL TROOPS TO THE RESCUE&mdash;FIGHTING THEIR WAY THROUGH
+BALTIMORE&mdash;REBEL THREATS&mdash;"SCOTT THE ARCH&mdash;TRAITOR, AND LINCOLN THE
+BEAST"&mdash;BUTLER RELIEVES WASHINGTON&mdash;THE SECESSION OF VIRGINIA AND NORTH
+CAROLINA&mdash;SHAMEFUL EVACUATION OF NORFOLK NAVY YARD&mdash;SEIZURE OF MINTS AND
+ARSENALS&mdash;UNION AND REBEL FORCES CONCENTRATING&mdash;THE NATIONAL CAPITAL
+FORTIFIED&mdash;BLOCKADE OF SOUTHERN PORTS&mdash;DEATH OF ELLSWORTH&mdash;BUTLER
+CONFISCATES NEGRO PROPERTY AS "CONTRABAND OF WAR"&mdash;A REBEL YARN
+<br>
+<br>
+<br><br>
+
+<h3>PORTRAITS</h3>
+<center>
+<table summary="">
+<tr><td>
+
+<a href="#hayne">ISAAC W. HAYNE,</a><br>
+<a href="#seward">WM. H. SEWARD,</a><br>
+<a href="#clay">HENRY CLAY,</a><br>
+<a href="#davis">JEFFERSON DAVIS,</a><br>
+
+</td></tr>
+</table>
+</center>
+
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+<a name="hayne"></a>
+<center>
+<img alt="p120-hayne.jpg (73K)" src="images/p120-hayne.jpg" height="849" width="577">
+</center>
+<br><br><br>
+
+<a name="ch6"></a>
+<br><br>
+
+
+
+<center>
+<h2> CHAPTER VI.<br>
+<br>
+ THE GREAT CONSPIRACY MATURING.<br></h2>
+</center>
+<p>The 6th of November, 1860, came and passed; on the 7th, the prevailing
+conviction that Lincoln would be elected had become a certainty, and
+before the close of that day, the fact had been heralded throughout the
+length and breadth of the Republic. The excitement of the People was
+unparalleled. The Republicans of the North rejoiced that at last the
+great wrong of Slavery was to be placed "where the People could rest in
+the belief that it was in the course of ultimate extinction!" The
+Douglas Democracy, naturally chagrined at the defeat of their great
+leader, were filled with gloomy forebodings touching the future of their
+Country; and the Southern Democracy, or at least a large portion of it,
+openly exulted that at last the long-wished-for opportunity for a revolt
+of the Slave Power, and a separation of the Slave from the Free States,
+was at hand. Especially in South Carolina were the "Fire-eating"
+Southrons jubilant over the event.</p>
+
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> ["South Carolina rejoiced over the election of Lincoln, with
+ bonfires and processions." p. 172, Arnold's "Life of Abraham
+ Lincoln."</p>
+
+<p> "There was great joy in Charleston, and wherever 'Fire Eaters' most
+ did congregate, on the morning of November 7th. Men rushed to
+ shake hands and congratulate each other on the glad tidings of
+ Lincoln's election. * * * Men thronged the streets, talking,
+ laughing, cheering, like mariners long becalmed on a hateful,
+ treacherous sea, whom a sudden breeze had swiftly wafted within
+ sight of their longed-for haven." p. 332, vol. i., Greeley's
+ American Conflict.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Meanwhile any number of joint resolutions looking to the calling of a
+Secession Convention, were introduced in the South Carolina Legislature,
+sitting at Columbia, having in view Secession contingent upon the
+"cooperation" of the other Slave States, or looking to immediate and
+"unconditional" Secession.</p>
+
+<p>On the evening of November 7th, Edmund Ruffin of Virginia&mdash;a Secession
+fanatic who had come from thence in hot haste&mdash;in response to a
+serenade, declared to the people of Columbia that: "The defense of the
+South, he verily believed, was only to be secured through the lead of
+South Carolina;" that, "old as he was, he had come here to join them in
+that lead;" and that "every day delayed, was a day lost to the Cause."
+He acknowledged that Virginia was "not as ready as South Carolina;" but
+declared that "The first drop of blood spilled on the soil of South
+Carolina would bring Virginia, and every Southern State, with them." He
+thought "it was perhaps better that Virginia, and all other border
+States, remain quiescent for a time, to serve as a guard against the
+North. * * * By remaining in the Union for a time, she would not only
+prevent coercive legislation in Congress, but any attempt for our
+subjugation."</p>
+
+<p>That same evening came news that, at Charleston, the Grand Jury of the
+United States District Court had refused to make any presentments,
+because of the Presidential vote just cast, which, they said, had "swept
+away the last hope for the permanence, for the stability, of the Federal
+Government of these Sovereign States;" and that United States District
+Judge Magrath had resigned his office, saying to the Grand Jury, as he
+did so: "In the political history of the United States, an event has
+happened of ominous import to fifteen Slave-holding States. The State
+of which we are citizens has been always understood to have deliberately
+fixed its purpose whenever that event should happen. Feeling an
+assurance of what will be the action of the State, I consider it my
+duty, without delay, to prepare to obey its wishes. That preparation is
+made by the resignation of the office I have held."</p>
+
+<p>The news of the resignations of the Federal Collector and District
+Attorney at Charleston, followed, with an intimation that that of the
+Sub-Treasurer would soon be forthcoming. On November 9th, a joint
+resolution calling an unconditional Secession Convention to meet at
+Columbia December 17th, was passed by the Senate, and on the 12th of
+November went through the House; and both of the United States Senators
+from South Carolina had now resigned their seats in the United States
+Senate.</p>
+
+<p>Besides all these and many other incitements to Secession was the fact
+that at Milledgeville, Georgia, Governor Brown had, November 12th,
+addressed a Georgian Military Convention, affirming "the right of
+Secession, and the duty of other Southern States to sustain South
+Carolina in the step she was then taking," and declaring that he "would
+like to see Federal troops dare attempt the coercion of a seceding
+Southern State! For every Georgian who fell in a conflict thus incited,
+the lives of two Federal Soldiers should expiate the outrage on State
+Sovereignty"&mdash;and that the Convention aforesaid had most decisively
+given its voice for Secession.</p>
+
+<p>It was about this time, however, that Alexander H. Stephens vainly
+sought to stem the tide of Secession in his own State, in a speech
+(November 14) before the Georgia Legislature, in which he declared that
+Mr. Lincoln "can do nothing unless he is backed by power in Congress.
+The House of Representatives is largely in the majority against him. In
+the Senate he will also be powerless. There will be a majority of four
+against him." He also cogently said: "Many of us have sworn to support
+it (the Constitution). Can we, therefore, for the mere election of a
+man to the Presidency&mdash;and that too, in accordance with the prescribed
+forms of the Constitution&mdash;make a point of resistance to the Government,
+and, without becoming the breakers of that sacred instrument ourselves,
+withdraw ourselves from it? Would we not be in the wrong?"</p>
+
+<p>But the occasional words of wisdom that fell from the lips of the few
+far-seeing statesmen of the South, were as chaff before the storm of
+Disunion raised by the turbulent Fire-eaters, and were blown far from
+the South, where they might have done some good for the Union cause,
+away up to the North, where they contributed to aid the success of the
+contemplated Treason and Rebellion, by lulling many of the people there,
+into a false sense of security. Unfortunately, also, even the ablest of
+the Southern Union men were so tainted with the heretical doctrine of
+States-Rights, which taught the "paramount allegiance" of the citizen to
+the State, that their otherwise powerful appeals for the preservation of
+the Union were almost invariably handicapped by the added protestation
+that in any event&mdash;and however they might deplore the necessity&mdash;they
+would, if need be, go with their State, against their own convictions of
+duty to the National Union.</p>
+
+<p>Hence in this same speech we find that Mr. Stephens destroyed the whole
+effect of his weighty and logical appeal against Secession from the
+Union, by adding to it, that, "Should Georgia determine to go out of the
+Union I shall bow to the will of her people. Their cause is my cause,
+and their destiny is my destiny; and I trust this will be the ultimate
+course of all."&mdash;and by further advising the calling of a Convention of
+the people to decide the matter; thus, in advance, as it were, binding
+himself hand and foot, despite his previous Union utterances, to do the
+fell bidding of the most rampant Disunionists. And thus, in due time,
+it befell, as we shall see, that this "saving clause" in his "Union
+speech," brought him at the end, not to that posture of patriotic
+heroism to which he aspired when he adjured his Georgian auditors to
+"let us be found to the last moment standing on the deck (of the
+Republic), with the Constitution of the United States waving over our
+heads," but to that of an imprisoned traitor and defeated rebel against
+the very Republic and Constitution which he had sworn to uphold and
+defend!</p>
+
+<p>The action of the South Carolina Legislature in calling an Unconditional
+Secession Convention, acted among the Southern States like a spark in a
+train of gunpowder. Long accustomed to incendiary resolutions of
+Pro-Slavery political platforms, as embodying the creed of Southern men;
+committed by those declarations to the most extreme action when, in
+their judgment, the necessity should arise; and worked up during the
+Presidential campaign by swarming Federal officials inspired by the
+fanatical Secession leaders; the entire South only needed the spark from
+the treasonable torch of South Carolina, to find itself ablaze, almost
+from one end to the other, with the flames of revolt.</p>
+
+<p>Governor after Governor, in State after State, issued proclamation after
+proclamation, calling together their respective Legislatures, to
+consider the situation and whether their respective States should join
+South Carolina in seceding from the Union. Kentucky alone, of them all,
+seemed for a time to keep cool, and look calmly and reasonably through
+the Southern ferment to the horrors beyond. In an address issued by
+Governor Magoffin of that State, to the people, he said:</p>
+
+<p>"To South Carolina and such other States as may wish to secede from the
+Union, I would say: The geography of this Country will not admit of a
+division; the mouth and sources of the Mississippi River cannot be
+separated without the horrors of Civil War. We cannot sustain you in
+this movement merely on account of the election of Mr. Lincoln. Do not
+precipitate by premature action into a revolution or Civil War, the
+consequences of which will be most frightful to all of us. It may yet
+be avoided. There is still hope, faint though it be. Kentucky is a
+Border State, and has suffered more than all of you. * * * She has a
+right to claim that her voice, and the voice of reason, and moderation
+and patriotism shall be heard and heeded by you. If you secede, your
+representatives will go out of Congress and leave us at the mercy of a
+Black Republican Government. Mr. Lincoln will have no check. He can
+appoint his Cabinet, and have it confirmed. The Congress will then be
+Republican, and he will be able to pass such laws as he may suggest.
+The Supreme Court will be powerless to protect us. We implore you to
+stand by us, and by our friends in the Free States; and let us all, the
+bold, the true, and just men in the Free and Slave States, with a united
+front, stand by each other, by our principles, by our rights, our
+equality, our honor, and by the Union under the Constitution. I believe
+this is the only way to save it; and we can do it."</p>
+
+<p>But this "still small voice" of conscience and of reason, heard like a
+whisper from the mouths of Stephens in Georgia, and Magoffin in
+Kentucky, was drowned in the clamor and tumult of impassioned harangues
+and addresses, and the drumming and tramp of the "minute men" of South
+Carolina, and other military organizations, as they excitedly prepared
+throughout the South for the dread conflict at arms which they
+recklessly invited, and savagely welcomed.</p>
+
+<p>We have seen how President Andrew Jackson some thirty years before, had
+stamped out Nullification and Disunion in South Carolina, with an iron
+heel.</p>
+
+<p>But a weak and feeble old man&mdash;still suffering from the effects of the
+mysterious National Hotel poisoning&mdash;was now in the Executive Chair at
+the White House. Well-meaning, doubtless, and a Union man at heart, his
+enfeebled intellect was unable to see, and hold firm to, the only true
+course. He lacked clearness of perception, decision of character, and
+nerve. He knew Secession was wrong, but allowed himself to be persuaded
+that he had no Constitutional power to prevent it. He had surrounded
+himself in the Cabinet with such unbending adherents and tools of the
+Slave-Power, as Howell Cobb of Georgia, his Secretary of the Treasury,
+John B. Floyd of Virginia, as Secretary of War, Jacob Thompson of
+Mississippi, as Secretary of the Interior, and Isaac Toucy of
+Connecticut, as Secretary of the Navy, before whose malign influence the
+councils of Lewis Cass of Michigan, the Secretary of State, and other
+Union men, in and out of the Cabinet, were quite powerless.</p>
+
+<p>When, therefore, the Congress met (December 3, 1860) and he transmitted
+to it his last Annual Message, it was found that, instead of treating
+Secession from the Jacksonian standpoint, President Buchanan feebly
+wailed over the threatened destruction of the Union, weakly apologized
+for the contemplated Treason, garrulously scolded the North as being to
+blame for it, and, while praying to God to "preserve the Constitution
+and the Union throughout all generations," wrung his nerveless hands in
+despair over his own powerlessness&mdash;as he construed the Constitution&mdash;to
+prevent Secession! Before writing his pitifully imbecile Message,
+President Buchanan had secured from his Attorney-General (Jeremiah S.
+Black of Pennsylvania) an opinion, in which the latter, after touching
+upon certain cases in which he believed the President would be justified
+in using force to sustain the Federal Laws, supposed the case of a State
+where all the Federal Officers had resigned and where there were neither
+Federal Courts to issue, nor officers to execute judicial process, and
+continued: "In that event, troops would certainly be out of place, and
+their use wholly illegal. If they are sent to aid the Courts and
+Marshals there must be Courts and Marshals to be aided. Without the
+exercise of these functions, which belong exclusively to the civil
+service, the laws cannot be executed in any event, no matter what may be
+the physical strength which the Government has at its command. Under
+such circumstances, to send a military force into any State, with orders
+to act against the people, would be simply making War upon them."</p>
+
+<p>Resting upon that opinion of Attorney-General Black, President Buchanan,
+in his Message, after referring to the solemn oath taken by the
+Executive "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed," and
+stating that there were now no longer any Federal Officers in South
+Carolina, through whose agency he could keep that oath, took up the laws
+of February 28, 1795, and March 3, 1807, as "the only Acts of Congress
+on the Statute-book bearing upon the subject," which "authorize the
+President, after he shall have ascertained that the Marshal, with his
+posse comitatus, is unable to execute civil or criminal process in any
+particular case, to call out the Militia and employ the Army and Navy to
+aid him in performing this service, having first, by Proclamation,
+commanded the insurgents to 'disperse and retire peaceably to their
+respective abodes, within a limited time'"&mdash;and thereupon held that
+"This duty cannot, by possibility, be performed in a State where no
+judicial authority exists to issue process, and where there is no
+Marshal to execute it; and where even if there were such an officer, the
+entire population would constitute one solid combination to resist him."
+And, not satisfied with attempting to show as clearly as he seemed to
+know how, his own inability under the laws to stamp out Treason, he
+proceeded to consider what he thought Congress also could not do under
+the Constitution. Said he: "The question fairly stated, is: Has the
+Constitution delegated to Congress the power to coerce into submission a
+State which is attempting to withdraw, or has actually withdrawn, from
+the Confederacy? If answered in the affirmative, it must be on the
+principle that the power has been conferred upon Congress to declare and
+make War against a State. After much serious reflection, I have arrived
+at the conclusion that no such power has been delegated to Congress or
+to any other department of the Federal Government." And further:
+"Congress possesses many means of preserving it (the Union) by
+conciliation; but the sword was not placed in their hands to preserve it
+by force."</p>
+
+<p>Thus, in President Buchanan's judgment, while, in another part of his
+Message, he had declared that no State had any right, Constitutional or
+otherwise, to Secede from that Union, which was designed for all
+time&mdash;yet, if any State concluded thus wrongfully to Secede, there existed no
+power in the Union, by the exercise of force, to preserve itself from
+instant dissolution! How imbecile the reasoning, how impotent the
+conclusion, compared with that of President Jackson, thirty years
+before, in his Proclamation against Nullification and Secession, wherein
+that sturdy patriot declared to the South Carolinians that "compared
+to Disunion, all other evils are light, because that brings with it an
+accumulation of all;" that "Disunion by armed force, is Treason;" and
+that he was determined "to execute the Laws," and "to preserve the
+Union!"</p>
+
+<p>President Buchanan's extraordinary Message&mdash;or so much of it as related
+to the perilous condition of the Union&mdash;was referred, in the House of
+Representatives, to a Select Committee of Thirty-three, comprising one
+member from each State, in which there was a very large preponderance of
+such as favored Conciliation without dishonor. But the debates in both
+Houses, in which the most violent language was indulged by the Southern
+Fire-eaters, as well as other events, soon proved that there was a
+settled purpose on the part of the Slave-Power and its adherents to
+resist and spit upon all attempts at placation.</p>
+
+<p>In the Senate also (December 5), a Select Committee of Thirteen was
+appointed, to consider the impending dangers to the Union, comprising
+Senators Powell of Kentucky, Hunter of Virginia, Crittenden of Kentucky,
+Seward of New York, Toombs of Georgia, Douglas of Illinois, Collamer of
+Vermont, Davis of Mississippi, Wade of Ohio, Bigler of Pennsylvania,
+Rice of Minnesota, Doolittle of Wisconsin, and Grimes of Iowa. Their
+labors were alike without practical result, owing to the irreconcilable
+attitude of the Southrons, who would accept nothing less than a total
+repudiation by the Republicans of the very principles upon which the
+recent Presidential contest had by them been fought and won. Nor would
+they even accept such a repudiation unless carried by vote of the
+majority of the Republicans. The dose that they insisted upon the
+Republican Party swallowing must not only be as noxious as possible, but
+must absolutely be mixed by that Party itself, and in addition, that
+Party must also go down on its knees, and beg the privilege of so mixing
+and swallowing the dose! That was the impossible attitude into which,
+by their bullying and threats, the Slave Power hoped to force the
+Republican Party&mdash;either that or "War."</p>
+
+<p>Project after project in both Houses of Congress looking to Conciliation
+was introduced, referred, reported, discussed, and voted on or not, as
+the case might be, in vain. And in the meantime, in New York, in
+Philadelphia, and elsewhere in the North, the timidity of Capital showed
+itself in great Conciliation meetings, where speeches were applauded and
+resolutions adopted of the most abject character, in behalf of "Peace,
+at any price," regardless of the sacrifice of honor and principles and
+even decency. In fact the Commercial North, with supplicating hands and
+beseeching face, sank on its knees in a vain attempt to propitiate its
+furious creditor, the South, by asking it not only to pull its nose, but
+to spit in its face, both of which it humbly and even anxiously offered
+for the purpose!*</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [Thus, in Philadelphia, December 13, 1860, at a great meeting held
+ at the call of the Mayor, in Independence Square, Mayor Henry led
+ off the speaking&mdash;which was nearly all in the same line&mdash;by saying:
+ "I tell you that if in any portion of our Confederacy, sentiments
+ have been entertained and cherished which are inimical to the civil
+ rights and social institutions of any other portion, those
+ sentiments should be relinquished." Another speaker, Judge George
+ W. Woodward, sneeringly asked: "Whence came these excessive
+ sensibilities that cannot bear a few slaves in a remote Territory
+ until the white people establish a Constitution?" Another, Mr.
+ Charles E. Lex (a Republican), speaking of the Southern People,
+ said: "What, then, can we say to them? what more than we have
+ expressed in the resolutions we have offered? If they are really
+ aggrieved by any laws upon our Statute-books opposed to their
+ rights&mdash;if upon examination any such are found to be in conflict
+ with the Constitution of these United States&mdash;nay, further, if they
+ but serve to irritate our brethren of the South, whether
+ Constitutional or not, I, for one, have no objection that they
+ should instantly be repealed." Another said, "Let us repeal our
+ obnoxious Personal Liberty bills * * *; let us receive our brother
+ of the South, if he will come among us for a little time, attended
+ by his servant, and permit him thus to come." And the resolutions
+ adopted were even still more abject in tone than the speeches.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>But the South at present was too busy in perfecting its long-cherished
+plans for the disruption of the Union, to more than grimly smile at this
+evidence of what it chose to consider "a divided sentiment" in the
+North. While it weakened the North, it strengthened the South, and
+instead of mollifying the Conspirators against the Union, it inspired
+them with fresh energy in their fell purpose to destroy it.</p>
+
+<p>The tone of the Republican press, too, while more dignified, was
+thoroughly conciliatory. The Albany Evening Journal,&mdash;[November 30,
+1860]&mdash;the organ of Governor Seward, recognizing that the South, blinded
+by passion, was in dead earnest, but also recognizing the existence of
+"a Union sentiment there, worth cherishing," suggested "a Convention of
+the People, consisting of delegates appointed by the States, in which it
+would not be found unprofitable for the North and South, bringing their
+respective griefs, claims, and proposed reforms, to a common
+arbitrament, to meet, discuss, and determine upon a future"&mdash;before a
+final appeal to arms. So, too, Horace Greeley, in the New York
+Tribune,&mdash;[November 9, 1860.]&mdash;after weakly conceding, on his own part,
+the right of peaceable Secession, said: "But while we thus uphold the
+practical liberty, if not the abstract right, of Secession, we must
+insist that the step be taken, if it ever shall be, with the
+deliberation and gravity befitting so momentous an issue. Let ample
+time be given for reflection; let the subject be fully canvassed before
+the People; and let a popular vote be taken in every case, before
+Secession is decreed." Other leading papers of the Northern press, took
+similar ground for free discussion and conciliatory action.</p>
+
+<p>In the Senate, as well as the House of Representatives&mdash;as also was
+shown by the appointment, heretofore mentioned, of Select Committees to
+consider the gravity of the situation, and suggest a remedy&mdash;the same
+spirit of Conciliation and Concession, and desire for free and frank
+discussion, was apparent among most of the Northern and Border-State
+members of those Bodies. But these were only met by sneers and threats
+on the part of the Fire-eating Secession members of the South. In the
+Senate, Senator Clingman of North Carolina, sneeringly said: "They want
+to get up a free debate, as the Senator (Mr. Seward) from New York
+expressed it, in one of his speeches. But a Senator from Texas told me
+the other day that a great many of these free debaters were hanging from
+the trees of that country;" and Senator Iverson, of Georgia, said:
+"Gentlemen speak of Concession, of the repeal of the Personal Liberty
+bills. Repeal them all to-morrow, and you cannot stop this revolution."
+After declaring his belief that "Before the 4th of March, five States
+will have declared their independence" and that "three other States will
+follow as soon as the action of the people can be had;" he proceeded to
+allude to the refusal of Governor Houston of Texas to call together the
+Texas Legislature for action in accord with the Secession sentiment, and
+declared that "if he will not yield to that public sentiment, some Texan
+Brutus will arise to rid his country of this hoary-headed incubus that
+stands between the people and their sovereign will!" Then, sneering at
+the presumed cowardice of the North, he continued: "Men talk about their
+eighteen millions (of Northern population); but we hear a few days
+afterwards of these same men being switched in the face, and they
+tremble like sheep-stealing dogs! There will be no War. The North,
+governed by such far-seeing Statesmen as the Senator (Mr. Seward) from
+New York, will see the futility of this. In less than twelve months, a
+Southern Confederacy will be formed; and it will be the most successful
+Government on Earth. The Southern States, thus banded together, will be
+able to resist any force in the World. We do not expect War; but we
+will be prepared for it&mdash;and we are not a feeble race of Mexicans
+either."</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, there were Republicans in that Body who sturdily met
+the bluster of the Southern Fire-eaters with frank and courageous words
+expressing their full convictions on the situation and their belief that
+Concessions could not be made and that Compromises were mere waste
+paper. Thus, Senator Ben Wade of Ohio, among the bravest and manliest
+of them all, in a speech in the Senate, December 17, the very day on
+which the South Carolina Secession Convention was to assemble, said to
+the Fire-eaters: "I tell you frankly that we did lay down the principle
+in our platform, that we would prohibit, if we had the power, Slavery
+from invading another inch of the Free Soil of this Government. I stand
+to that principle to-day. I have argued it to half a million of people,
+and they stand by it; they have commissioned me to stand by it; and, so
+help me God, I will! * * * On the other hand, our platform repudiates
+the idea that we have any right, or harbor any ultimate intention to
+invade or interfere with your institutions in your own States. * * *
+It is not, by your own confessions, that Mr. Lincoln is expected to
+commit any overt act by which you may be injured. You will not even
+wait for any, you say; but, by anticipating that the Government may do
+you an injury, you will put an end to it&mdash;which means, simply and
+squarely, that you intend to rule or ruin this Government. * * * As to
+Compromises, I supposed that we had agreed that the Day of Compromises
+was at an end. The most solemn we have made have been violated, and are
+no more. * * * We beat you on the plainest and most palpable issue
+ever presented to the American people, and one which every man
+understood; and now, when we come to the Capital, we tell you that our
+candidates must and shall be inaugurated&mdash;must and shall administer this
+Government precisely as the Constitution prescribes. * * * I tell you
+that, with that verdict of the people in my pocket, and standing on the
+platform on which these candidates were elected, I would suffer anything
+before I would Compromise in any way."</p>
+
+<p>In the House of Representatives, on December 10, 1860, a number of
+propositions looking to a peaceful settlement of the threatened danger,
+were offered and referred to the Select Committee of Thirty-three. On
+the following Monday, December 17, by 154 yeas to 14 nays, the House
+adopted a resolution, offered by Mr. Adrian of New Jersey, in these
+words:</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That we deprecate the spirit of disobedience to the
+Constitution, wherever manifested; and that we earnestly recommend the
+repeal of all Statutes by the State Legislatures in conflict with, and
+in violation of, that sacred instrument, and the laws of Congress passed
+in pursuance thereof."</p>
+
+<p>On the same day, the House adopted, by 135 yeas to no nays, a resolution
+offered by Mr. Lovejoy of Illinois, in these words:</p>
+
+<p>"Whereas, The Constitution of the United States is the Supreme law of
+the Land, and ready and faithful obedience to it a duty of all good and
+law-abiding citizens; Therefore:</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That we deprecate the spirit of disobedience to the
+Constitution, wherever manifested; and that we earnestly recommend the
+repeal of all Nullification laws; and that it is the duty of the
+President of the United States to protect and defend the property of the
+United States."</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [This resolution, before adoption, was modified by declaring it to
+ be the duty of all citizens, whether "good and law abiding" or not,
+ to yield obedience to the Constitution, as will be seen by
+ referring to the proceedings in the Globe of that date, where the
+ following appears:</p>
+
+<p> "Mr. LOGAN. I hope there will be no objection on this side of the
+ House to the introduction of the [Lovejoy] resolution. I can see
+ no difference myself, between this resolution and the one
+ [Adrian's] just passed, except in regard to verbiage. I can find
+ but one objection to the resolution, and that is in the use of the
+ words declaring that all' law abiding' citizens should obey the
+ Constitution. I think that all men should do so.</p>
+
+<p> "Mr. LOVEJOY. I accept the amendment suggested by my Colleague.</p>
+
+<p> "Mr. LOGAN. It certainly should include members of Congress; but
+ if it is allowed to remain all 'good and law abiding' citizens, I
+ do not think it will include them. [Laughter.]</p>
+
+<p> "The resolution was modified by the omission of those words."]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>It also adopted, by 115 yeas to 44 nays, a resolution offered by Mr.
+Morris of Illinois, as follows:</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved by the House of Representatives: That we properly estimate the
+immense value of our National Union to our collective and individual
+happiness; that we cherish a cordial, habitual, and immovable attachment
+to it; that we will speak of it as the palladium of our political safety
+and prosperity; that we will watch its preservation with jealous
+anxiety; that we will discountenance whatever may suggest even a
+suspicion that it can, in any event, be abandoned, and indignantly frown
+upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our
+Country from the rest, or enfeeble the sacred ties which now link
+together the various parts; that we regard it as a main pillar in the
+edifice of our real independence, the support of tranquillity at home,
+our peace abroad, our safety, our prosperity, and that very liberty
+which we so highly prize; that we have seen nothing in the past, nor do
+we see anything in the present, either in the election of Abraham
+Lincoln to the Presidency of the United States, or from any other
+existing cause, to justify its dissolution; that we regard its
+perpetuity as of more value than the temporary triumph of any Party or
+any man; that whatever evils or abuses exist under it ought to be
+corrected within the Union, in a peaceful and Constitutional way; that
+we believe it has sufficient power to redress every wrong and enforce
+every right growing out of its organization, or pertaining to its proper
+functions; and that it is a patriotic duty to stand by it as our hope in
+Peace and our defense in War."</p>
+
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+<a name="seward"></a>
+<center>
+<img alt="p128-seward.jpg (74K)" src="images/p128-seward.jpg" height="847" width="590">
+</center>
+<br><br><br>
+<a name="ch7"></a>
+<br><br>
+
+<center><h2>
+ CHAPTER VII.<br><br>
+
+ SECESSION ARMING.</h2></center><br>
+
+<p>While Congress was encouraging devotion to the Union, and its Committees
+striving for some mode by which the impending perils might be averted
+without a wholesale surrender of all just principles, the South Carolina
+Convention met (December 17, 1860) at Columbia, and after listening to
+inflammatory addresses by commissioners from the States of Alabama and
+Mississippi, urging immediate and unconditional Secession, unanimously
+and with "tremendous cheering" adopted a resolution: "That it is the
+opinion of the Convention that the State of South Carolina should
+forthwith Secede from the Federal Union, known as the United States of
+America,"&mdash;and then adjourned to meet at Charleston, South Carolina.</p>
+
+<p>The next day, and following days, it met there, at "Secession Hall,"
+listening to stimulating addresses, while a committee of seven worked
+upon the Ordinance of Secession. Among the statements made by orators,
+were several clear admissions that the rebellious Conspiracy had existed
+for very many years, and that Mr. Lincoln's election was simply the
+long-sought-for pretext for Rebellion. Mr. Parker said: "It is no
+spasmodic effort that has come suddenly upon us; it has been gradually
+culminating for a long period of thirty years. At last it has come to
+that point where we may say, the matter is entirely right." Mr. Inglis
+said: "Most of us have had this matter under consideration for the last
+twenty years; and I presume that we have by this time arrived at a
+decision upon the subject." Mr. Keitt said: "I have been engaged in
+this movement ever since I entered political life; * * * we have
+carried the body of this Union to its last resting place, and now we
+will drop the flag over its grave." Mr. Barnwell Rhett said: "The
+Secession of South Carolina is not an event of a day. It is not
+anything produced by Mr. Lincoln's election, or by the non-execution of
+the Fugitive Slave Law. It has been a matter which has been gathering
+head for thirty years." Mr. Gregg said: "If we undertake to set forth
+all the causes, do we not dishonor the memory of all the statesmen of
+South Carolina, now departed, who commenced forty years ago a war
+against the tariff and against internal improvement, saying nothing of
+the United States Bank, and other measures which may now be regarded as
+obsolete."</p>
+
+<p>On the 20th of December, 1860&mdash;the fourth day of the sittings&mdash;the
+Ordinance of Secession was reported by the Committee, and was at once
+unanimously passed, as also was a resolution that "the passage of the
+Ordinance be proclaimed by the firing of artillery and ringing of the
+bells of the city, and such other demonstrations as the people may deem
+appropriate on the passage of the great Act of Deliverance and Liberty;"
+after which the Convention jubilantly adjourned to meet, and ratify,
+that evening. At the evening session of this memorable Convention, the
+Governor and Legislature attending, the famous Ordinance was read as
+engrossed, signed by all the delegates, and, after announcement by the
+President that "the State of South Carolina is now and henceforth a Free
+and Independent Commonwealth;" amid tremendous cheering, the Convention
+adjourned. This, the first Ordinance of Secession passed by any of the
+Revolting States, was in these words:</p>
+
+<p>"An Ordinance to dissolve the Union between the State of South Carolina
+and other States united with her, under the compact entitled the
+'Constitution of the United States of America.'</p>
+
+<p>"We the people of the State of South Carolina in Convention assembled,
+do declare and ordain, and it is hereby declared and ordained, that the
+Ordinance adopted by us in Convention on the 23rd day of May, in the
+year of our Lord 1788, whereby the Constitution of the United States of
+America was ratified, and also all Acts and parts of Acts of the General
+Assembly of this State ratifying the amendments of the said
+Constitution, are hereby repealed; and that the Union now subsisting
+between South Carolina and other States, under the name of the United
+States of America, is hereby dissolved."</p>
+
+<p>Thus, and in these words, was joyously adopted and ratified, that solemn
+Act of Separation which was doomed to draw in its fateful train so many
+other Southern States, in the end only to be blotted out with the blood
+of hundreds of thousands of their own brave sons, and their equally
+courageous Northern brothers.</p>
+
+<p>State after State followed South Carolina in the mad course of Secession
+from the Union. Mississippi passed a Secession Ordinance, January 9,
+1861. Florida followed, January 10th; Alabama, January 11th; Georgia,
+January 18th; Louisiana, January 26th; and Texas, February 1st;
+Arkansas, North Carolina, and Virginia held back until a later period;
+while Kentucky, Tennessee, Missouri, Maryland, and Delaware, abstained
+altogether from taking the fatal step, despite all attempts to bring
+them to it.</p>
+
+<p>In the meantime, however, South Carolina had put on all the dignity of
+a Sovereign and Independent State. Her Governor had a "cabinet"
+comprising Secretaries of State, War, Treasury, the Interior, and a
+Postmaster General. She had appointed Commissioners, to proceed to the
+other Slave-holding States, through whom a Southern Congress was
+proposed, to meet at Montgomery, Alabama; and had appointed seven
+delegates to meet the delegates from such other States in that proposed
+Southern Congress. On the 21st of December, 1860, three Commissioners
+(Messrs. Barnwell, Adams, and Orr) were also appointed to proceed to
+Washington, and treat for the cession by the United States to South
+Carolina, of all Federal property within the limits of the latter. On
+the 24th, Governor Pickens issued a Proclamation announcing the adoption
+of the Ordinance of Secession, declaring "that the State of South
+Carolina is, as she has a right to be, a separate sovereign, free and
+independent State, and as such, has a right to levy war, conclude peace,
+negotiate treaties, leagues or covenants, and to do all acts whatsoever
+that rightfully appertain to a free and independent State;" the which
+proclamation was announced as "Done in the eighty-fifth year of the
+Sovereignty and Independence of South Carolina." On the same day (the
+Senators from that State in the United States Senate having long since,
+as we have seen, withdrawn from that body) the Representatives of South
+Carolina in the United States House of Representatives withdrew.</p>
+
+<p>Serious dissensions in the Cabinet of President Buchanan, were now
+rapidly disintegrating the "official family" of the President. Lewis
+Cass, the Secretary of State, disgusted with the President's cowardice
+and weakness, and declining to be held responsible for Mr. Buchanan's
+promise not to reinforce the garrisons of the National Forts, under
+Major Anderson, in Charleston harbor, retired from the Cabinet December
+12th&mdash;Howell Cobb having already, "because his duty to Georgia required
+it," resigned the Secretaryship of the Treasury, and left it bankrupt
+and the credit of the Nation almost utterly destroyed.</p>
+
+<p>On the 26th of December, Major Anderson evacuated Fort Moultrie,
+removing all his troops and munitions of war to Fort Sumter&mdash;whereupon a
+cry went up from Charleston that this was in violation of the
+President's promise to take no step looking to hostilities, provided the
+Secessionists committed no overt act of Rebellion, up to the close of
+his fast expiring Administration. On the 29th, John B. Floyd, Secretary
+of War, having failed to secure the consent of the Administration to an
+entire withdrawal of the Federal garrison from the harbor of Charleston,
+also resigned, and the next day&mdash;he having in the meantime escaped in
+safety to Virginia&mdash;was indicted by the Grand Jury at Washington, for
+malfeasance and conspiracy to defraud the Government in the theft of
+$870,000 of Indian Trust Bonds from the Interior Department, and the
+substitution therefor of Floyd's acceptances of worthless
+army-transportation drafts on the Treasury Department.</p>
+
+<p>Jacob Thompson, Secretary of the Interior, also resigned, January 8th,
+1861, on the pretext that "additional troops, he had heard, have been
+ordered to Charleston" in the "Star of the West."&mdash;[McPherson's History
+of the Rebellion, p. 28.]</p>
+
+<p>Several changes were thus necessitated in Mr. Buchanan's cabinet, by
+these and other resignations, so that by the 18th of January, 1861,
+Jeremiah S. Black was Secretary of State; General John A. Dix, Secretary
+of the Treasury; Joseph Holt, Secretary of War; Edwin M. Stanton,
+Attorney General; and Horatio King, Postmaster General. But before
+leaving the Cabinet, the conspiring Southern members of it, and their
+friends, had managed to hamstring the National Government, by scattering
+the Navy in other quarters of the World; by sending the few troops of
+the United States to remote points; by robbing the arsenals in the
+Northern States of arms and munitions of war, so as to abundantly supply
+the Southern States at the critical moment; by bankrupting the Treasury
+and shattering the public credit of the Nation; and by other means no
+less nefarious. Thus swindled, betrayed, and ruined, by its degenerate
+and perfidious sons, the imbecile Administration stood with dejected
+mien and folded hands helplessly awaiting the coming catastrophe.</p>
+
+<p>On December 28th, 1860, the three Commissioners of South Carolina having
+reached Washington, addressed to the President a communication, in
+which&mdash;after reciting their powers and duties, under the Ordinance of
+Secession, and stating that they had hoped to have been ready to proceed
+to negotiate amicably and without "hostile collision," but that "the
+events&mdash;[The removal, to Fort Sumter, of Major Anderson's command, and
+what followed.]&mdash;of the last twenty-four hours render such an assurance
+impossible"&mdash;they declared that the troops must be withdrawn from
+Charleston harbor, as "they are a standing menace which render
+negotiation impossible," threatening speedily to bring the questions
+involved, to "a bloody issue."</p>
+
+<p>To this communication Mr. Buchanan replied at considerable length,
+December 30th, in an apologetic, self-defensive strain, declaring that
+the removal by Major Anderson of the Federal troops under his command,
+from Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter was done "upon his own responsibility,
+and without authority," and that he (the President) "had intended to
+command him to return to his former position," but that events had so
+rapidly transpired as to preclude the giving of any such command;</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [The seizure by the Secessionists, under the Palmetto Flag, of
+ Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie; the simultaneous raising of that
+ flag over the Federal Custom House and Post Office at Charleston;
+ the resignation of the Federal Collector, Naval Officer and
+ Surveyor of that Port&mdash;all of which occurred December 27th; and the
+ seizure "by force of arms," December 30th, of the United States
+ Arsenal at that point.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>and concluding, with a very slight stiffening of backbone, by saying:
+"After this information, I have only to add that, whilst it is my duty
+to defend Fort Sumter as a portion of the public property of the United
+States against hostile attacks, from whatever quarter they may come, by
+such means as I may possess for this purpose, I do not perceive how such
+a defense can be construed into a menace against the city of
+Charleston." To this reply of the President, the Commissioners made
+rejoinder on the 1st of January, 1861; but the President "declined to
+receive" the communication.</p>
+
+<p>From this time on, until the end of President Buchanan's term of office,
+and the inauguration of Mr. Lincoln as President, March 4th, 1861,
+events crowded each other so hurriedly, that the flames of Rebellion in
+the South were continually fanned, while the public mind in the North
+was staggered and bewildered, by them.</p>
+
+<p>On January 2nd, prior to the Secession of Georgia, Forts Pulaski and
+Jackson, commanding Savannah, and the Federal Arsenal at Augusta,
+Georgia, with two 12 pound howitzers, two cannon, 22,000 muskets and
+rifles, and ammunition in quantity, were seized by Rebel militia. About
+the same date, although North Carolina had not seceded, her Governor
+(Ellis) seized the Federal Arsenal at Fayetteville, Fort Macon, and
+other fortifications in that State, "to preserve them" from mob-seizure.</p>
+
+<p>January 4th, anticipating Secession, Alabama State troops seized Fort
+Morgan, with 5,000 shot and shell, and Mount Vernon Arsenal at Mobile,
+with 2,000 stand of arms, 150, 000 pounds of powder, some pieces of
+cannon, and a large quantity of other munitions of war. The United
+States Revenue cutter, "Lewis Cass," was also surrendered to Alabama.</p>
+
+<p>On the 5th, the Federal steamer "Star of the West," with reinforcements
+and supplies for Fort Sumter, left New York in the night&mdash;and Secretary
+Jacob Thompson notified the South Carolina Rebels of the fact.</p>
+
+<p>On the 9th, the "Star of the West" appeared off Charleston bar, and
+while steaming toward Fort Sumter, was fired upon by Rebel batteries at
+Fort Moultrie and Morris Island, and struck by a shot, whereupon she
+returned to New York without accomplishing her mission. That day the
+State of Mississippi seceded from the Union.</p>
+
+<p>On the 10th, the Federal storeship "Texas," with Federal guns and
+stores, was seized by Texans. On the same day Florida seceded.</p>
+
+<p>On the 11th, Forts Jackson and St. Philip, commanding the mouth of the
+Mississippi River, and Fort Pike, dominating Lake Pontchartrain, were
+seized by Louisiana troops; also the Federal Arsenal at Baton Rouge,
+with 50,000 small arms, 4 howitzers, 20 heavy pieces of ordnance, 2
+batteries, 300 barrels of powder, and other stores. The State of
+Alabama also seceded the same day.</p>
+
+<p>On the 12th&mdash;Fort Marion, the coast surveying schooner "Dana," the
+Arsenal at St. Augustine, and that on the Chattahoochee, with 500,000
+musket cartridges, 300,000 rifle cartridges and 50,000 pounds of powder,
+having previously been seized&mdash;Forts Barrancas and McRae, and the Navy
+Yard at Pensacola, were taken by Rebel troops of Florida, Alabama and
+Mississippi. On the same day, Colonel Hayne, of South Carolina, arrived
+at Washington as Agent or Commissioner to the National Government from
+Governor Pickens of that State.</p>
+
+<p>On the 14th, the South Carolina Legislature resolved "that any attempt
+by the Federal Government to reinforce Fort Sumter will be regarded as
+an act of open hostility, and a Declaration of War."</p>
+
+<p>On the 16th, Colonel Hayne, of South Carolina, developed his mission,
+which was to demand of the President the surrender of Fort Sumter to the
+South Carolina authorities&mdash;a demand that had already been made upon,
+and refused by, Major Anderson.</p>
+
+<p>The correspondence concerning this demand, between Colonel Hayne and ten
+Southern United States Senators;&mdash;[Senators Wigfall, Hemphill, Yulee,
+Mallory, Jeff. Davis, C. C. Clay, Fitzgerald, Iverson, Slidell, and
+Benjamin.]&mdash;the reply of the President, by Secretary Holt, to those
+Senators; Governor Pickens's review of the same; and the final demand;
+consumed the balance of the month of January; and ended, February 6th,
+in a further reply, through the Secretary of War, from the President,
+asserting the title of the United States to that Fort, and declining the
+demand, as "he has no Constitutional power to cede or surrender it."
+Secretary Holt's letter concluded by saying: "If, with all the
+multiplied proofs which exist of the President's anxiety for Peace, and
+of the earnestness with which he has pursued it, the authorities of that
+State shall assault Fort Sumter, and peril the lives of the handful of
+brave and loyal men shut up within its walls, and thus plunge our Common
+Country into the horrors of Civil War, then upon them and those they
+represent, must rest the responsibility."</p>
+
+<p>But to return from this momentary diversion: On the 18th of January,
+Georgia seceded; and on the 20th, the Federal Fort at Ship Island,
+Mississippi, and the United States Hospital on the Mississippi River
+were seized by Mississippi troops.</p>
+
+<p>On the 26th, Louisiana seceded. On the 28th, Louisiana troops seized
+all the quartermaster's and commissary stores held by Federal officials;
+and the United States Revenue cutter "McClelland" surrendered to the
+Rebels.</p>
+
+<p>On February 1st, the Louisiana Rebels seized the National Mint and
+Custom House at New Orleans, with $599,303 in gold and silver. On the
+same day the State of Texas seceded.</p>
+
+<p>On February 8th, the National Arsenal at Little Rock, Arkansas, with
+9,000 small arms, 40 cannon, and quantities of ammunition, was seized;
+and the same day the Governor of Georgia ordered the National Collector
+of the Port of Savannah to retain all collections and make no further
+payments to the United States Government.*</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p>
+ [It was during this eventful month that, certain United States
+ troops having assembled at the National Capital, and the House of
+ Representatives having asked the reason therefor, reply was made by
+ the Secretary of War as follows:</p>
+
+<p> "WAR DEPARTMENT, February 18, 1861.
+ [Congressional Globe, August 8, 1861, pp. 457,458]
+ "SIR: On the 11th February, the House of Representatives adopted a
+ resolution requesting the President, if not incompatible with the
+ public interests, to communicate 'the reasons that had induced him
+ to assemble so large a number of troops in this city, and why they
+ are kept here; and whether he has any information of a Conspiracy
+ upon the part of any portion of the citizens of this Country to
+ seize upon the Capital and prevent the Inauguration of the
+ President elect.'</p>
+
+<p> "This resolution having been submitted to this Department for
+ consideration and report, I have the honor to state, that the body
+ of troops temporarily transferred to this city is not as large as
+ is assumed by the resolution, though it is a well-appointed corps
+ and admirably adapted for the preservation of the public peace.
+ The reasons which led to their being assembled here will now be
+ briefly stated.</p>
+
+<p> "I shall make no comment upon the origin of the Revolution which,
+ for the last three months, has been in progress in several of the
+ Southern States, nor shall I enumerate the causes which have
+ hastened its advancement or exasperated its temper. The scope of
+ the questions submitted by the House will be sufficiently met by
+ dealing with the facts as they exist, irrespective of the cause
+ from which they have proceeded. That Revolution has been
+ distinguished by a boldness and completeness of success rarely
+ equaled in the history of Civil Commotions. Its overthrow of the
+ Federal authority has not only been sudden and wide-spread, but has
+ been marked by excesses which have alarmed all and been sources of
+ profound humiliation to a large portion of the American People.
+ Its history is a history of surprises and treacheries and ruthless
+ spoliations. The Forts of the United States have been captured and
+ garrisoned, and hostile flags unfurled upon their ramparts. Its
+ arsenals have been seized, and the vast amount of public arms they
+ contained appropriated to the use of the captors; while more than
+ half a million dollars, found in the Mint at New Orleans, has been
+ unscrupulously applied to replenish the coffers of Louisiana.
+ Officers in command of revenue cutters of the United States have
+ been prevailed on to violate their trusts and surrender the
+ property in their charge; and instead of being branded for their
+ crimes, they, and the vessels they betrayed, have been cordially
+ received into the service of the Seceded States. These movements
+ were attended by yet more discouraging indications of immorality.
+ It was generally believed that this Revolution was guided and urged
+ on by men occupying the highest positions in the public service,
+ and who, with the responsibilities of an oath to support the
+ Constitution still resting upon their consciences, did not hesitate
+ secretly to plan and openly to labor for, the dismemberment of the
+ Republic whose honors they enjoyed and upon whose Treasury they
+ were living. As examples of evil are always more potent than those
+ of good, this spectacle of demoralization on the part of States and
+ statesmen could not fail to produce the most deplorable
+ consequences. The discontented and the disloyal everywhere took
+ courage. In other States, adjacent to and supposed to sympathize
+ in sense of political wrong with those referred to, Revolutionary
+ schemes were set on foot, and Forts and arms of the United States
+ seized. The unchecked prevalence of the Revolution, and the
+ intoxication which its triumphs inspired, naturally suggested
+ wilder and yet more desperate enterprises than the conquest of
+ ungarrisoned Forts, or the plunder of an unguarded Mint. At what
+ time the armed occupation of Washington City became a part of the
+ Revolutionary Programme, is not certainly known. More than six
+ weeks ago, the impression had already extensively obtained that a
+ Conspiracy for the accomplishment of this guilty purpose was in
+ process of formation, if not fully matured. The earnest endeavors
+ made by men known to be devoted to the Revolution, to hurry
+ Virginia and Maryland out of the Union, were regarded as
+ preparatory steps for the subjugation of Washington. This plan was
+ in entire harmony with the aim and spirit of those seeking the
+ subversion of the Government, since no more fatal blow at its
+ existence could be struck than the permanent and hostile possession
+ of the seat of its power. It was in harmony, too, with the avowed
+ designs of the Revolutionists, which looked to the formation of a
+ Confederacy of all the Slave States, and necessarily to the
+ Conquest of the Capital within their limits. It seemed not very
+ indistinctly prefigured in a Proclamation made upon the floor of
+ the Senate, without qualification, if not exultingly, that the
+ Union was already dissolved&mdash;a Proclamation which, however
+ intended, was certainly calculated to invite, on the part of men of
+ desperate fortunes or of Revolutionary States, a raid upon the
+ Capital. In view of the violence and turbulent disorders already
+ exhibited in the South, the public mind could not reject such a
+ scheme as at all improbable. That a belief in its existence was
+ entertained by multitudes, there can be no doubt, and this belief I
+ fully shared. My conviction rested not only on the facts already
+ alluded to, but upon information, some of which was of a most
+ conclusive character, that reached the Government from many parts
+ of the Country, not merely expressing the prevalence of the opinion
+ that such an organization had been formed, but also often
+ furnishing the plausible grounds on which the opinion was based.
+ Superadded to these proofs, were the oft-repeated declarations of
+ men in high political positions here, and who were known to have
+ intimate affiliations with the Revolution&mdash;if indeed they did not
+ hold its reins in their hands&mdash;to the effect that Mr. Lincoln would
+ not, or should not be inaugurated at Washington. Such
+ declarations, from such men, could not be treated as empty bluster.
+ They were the solemn utterances of those who well understood the
+ import of their words, and who, in the exultation of the temporary
+ victories gained over their Country's flag in the South, felt
+ assured that events would soon give them the power to verify their
+ predictions. Simultaneously with these prophetic warnings, a
+ Southern journal of large circulation and influence, and which is
+ published near the city of Washington, advocated its seizure as a
+ possible political necessity.</p>
+
+<p> "The nature and power of the testimony thus accumulated may be best
+ estimated by the effect produced upon the popular mind.
+ Apprehensions for the safety of the Capital were communicated from
+ points near and remote, by men unquestionably reliable and loyal.
+ The resident population became disquieted, and the repose of many
+ families in the city was known to be disturbed by painful
+ anxieties. Members of Congress, too&mdash;men of calm and comprehensive
+ views, and of undoubted fidelity to their Country&mdash;frankly
+ expressed their solicitude to the President and to this Department,
+ and formally insisted that the defenses of the Capital should be
+ strengthened. With such warnings, it could not be forgotten that,
+ had the late Secretary of War heeded the anonymous letter which he
+ received, the tragedy at Harper's Ferry would have been avoided;
+ nor could I fail to remember that, had the early admonitions which
+ reached here in regard to the designs of lawless men upon the Forts
+ of Charleston Harbor been acted on by sending forward adequate
+ reinforcements before the Revolution began, the disastrous
+ political complications that ensued might not have occurred.</p>
+
+<p> "Impressed by these circumstances and considerations, I earnestly
+ besought you to allow the concentration, at this city, of a
+ sufficient military force to preserve the public peace from all the
+ dangers that seemed to threaten it. An open manifestation, on the
+ part of the Administration, of a determination, as well as of the
+ ability, to maintain the laws, would, I was convinced, prove the
+ surest, as also the most pacific, means of baffling and dissolving
+ any Conspiracy that might have been organized. It was believed too
+ that the highest and most solemn responsibility resting upon a
+ President withdrawing from the Government, was to secure to his
+ successor a peaceful Inauguration. So deeply, in my judgment, did
+ this duty concern the whole Country and the fair fame of our
+ Institutions, that, to guarantee its faithful discharge, I was
+ persuaded no preparation could be too determined or too complete.
+ The presence of the troops alluded to in the resolution is the
+ result of the conclusion arrived at by yourself and Cabinet, on the
+ proposition submitted to you by this Department. Already this
+ display of life and loyalty on the part of your Administration, has
+ produced the happiest effects. Public confidence has been
+ restored, and the feverish apprehension which it was so mortifying
+ to contemplate has been banished. Whatever may have been the
+ machinations of deluded, lawless men, the execution of their
+ purpose has been suspended, if not altogether abandoned in view of
+ preparations which announce more impressively than words that this
+ Administration is alike able and resolved to transfer in peace, to
+ the President elect, the authority that, under the Constitution,
+ belongs to him. To those, if such there be, who desire the
+ destruction of the Republic, the presence of these troops is
+ necessarily offensive; but those who sincerely love our
+ Institutions cannot fail to rejoice that, by this timely precaution
+ they have possibly escaped the deep dishonor which they must have
+ suffered had the Capital, like the Forts and Arsenals of the South,
+ fallen into the hands of the Revolutionists, who have found this
+ great Government weak only because, in the exhaustless beneficence
+ of its spirit, it has refused to strike, even in its own defense,
+ lest it should wound the aggressor.</p>
+
+<p> "I have the honor to be, very respectfully, your obedient servant,</p>
+
+<p> "J. HOLT.
+ "Secretary of War,</p>
+
+<p> "THE PRESIDENT."]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>
+On February 20th, Forts Chadbourne and Belknap were seized by the Texan
+Rebels; and on the 22nd, the Federal General Twiggs basely surrendered
+to them all the fortifications under his control, his little Army, and
+all the Government stores in his possession&mdash;comprising $55,000 in
+specie, 35,000 stand of arms, 26 pieces of mounted artillery, 44
+dismounted guns, and ammunition, horses, wagons, forage, etc., valued at
+nearly $2,000,000.</p>
+
+<p>On the 2nd of March, the Texan Rebels seized the United States Revenue
+cutter "Dodge" at Galveston; and on the 6th, Fort Brown was surrendered
+to them.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, with surrender after surrender, and seizure after
+seizure, of its revenue vessels and fortifications and troops and arms
+and munitions of war in the Southern States&mdash;with Fort Sumter invested
+and at the mercy of any attack, and Fortress Monroe alone of all the
+National strongholds yet safe&mdash;with State after State seceding&mdash;what
+wonder that, while these events gave all encouragement to the Southern
+Rebels, the Patriots of the North stood aghast at the appalling
+spectacle of a crumbling and dissolving Union!</p>
+
+<p>During this period of National peril, the debates in both branches of
+Congress upon propositions for adjustment of the unfortunate differences
+between the Southern Seceders and the Union, as has been already hinted,
+contributed still further to agitate the public mind. Speech after
+speech by the ablest and most brilliant Americans in public life, for or
+against such propositions, and discussing the rightfulness or
+wrongfulness of Secession, were made in Congress day after day, and, by
+means of the telegraph and the press, alternately swayed the Northern
+heart with feelings of hope, chagrin, elation or despair.</p>
+
+<p>The Great Debate was opened in the Senate on almost the very first day
+of its session (December 4th, 1860), by Mr. Clingman, of North Carolina,
+who, referring to South Carolina, declared that "Instead of being
+precipitate, she and the whole South have been wonderfully patient." A
+portion of that speech is interesting even at this time, as showing how
+certain phases of the Tariff and Internal Improvement questions entered
+into the consideration of some of the Southern Secession leaders. Said
+he, "I know there are intimations that suffering will fall upon us of
+the South, if we secede. My people are not terrified by any such
+considerations. * * * They have no fears of the future if driven to
+rely on themselves. The Southern States have more territory than all
+the Colonies had when they Seceded from Great Britain, and a better
+territory. Taking its position, climate, and fertility into
+consideration, there is not upon Earth a body of territory superior to
+it. * * * The Southern States have, too, at this day, four times the
+population the Colonies had when they Seceded from Great Britain. Their
+exports to the North and to Foreign Countries were, last year, more than
+$300,000,000; and a duty of ten per cent. upon the same amount of
+imports would give $30,000,000 of revenue&mdash;twice as much as General
+Jackson's administration spent in its first year. Everybody can see,
+too, how the bringing in of $300,000,000 of imports into Southern ports
+would enliven business in our seaboard towns. I have seen with some
+satisfaction, also, Mr. President, that the war made upon us has
+benefitted certain branches of industry in my State. There are
+manufacturing establishments in North Carolina, the proprietors of which
+tell me that they are making fifty per cent. annually on their whole
+capital, and yet cannot supply one tenth of the demand for their
+production. The result of only ten per cent. duties in excluding
+products from abroad, would give life and impetus to mechanical and
+manufacturing industry, throughout the entire South. Our people
+understand these things, and they are not afraid of results, if forced
+to declare Independence. Indeed I do not see why Northern Republicans
+should wish to continue a connection with us upon any terms. * * *
+They want High Tariff likewise. They may put on five hundred per cent.
+if they choose, upon their own imports, and nobody on our side will
+complain. They may spend all the money they raise on railroads, or
+opening harbors, or anything on earth they desire, without interference
+from us; and it does seem to me that if they are sincere in their views
+they ought to welcome a separation."</p>
+
+<p>From the very commencement of this long three-months debate, it was the
+policy of the Southern leaders to make it appear that the Southern
+States were in an attitude of injured innocence and defensiveness
+against Northern aggression. Hence, it was that, as early as December
+5th, on the floor of the Senate, through Mr. Brown, of Mississippi, they
+declared: "All we ask is to be allowed to depart in Peace. Submit we
+will not; and if, because we will not submit to your domination, you
+choose to make War upon us, let God defend the Right!"</p>
+
+<p>At the same time it was esteemed necessary to try and frighten the North
+into acquiescence with this demand to be "let alone." Hence such
+utterances as those of Clingman and Iverson, to which reference has
+already been made, and the especially defiant close of the latter's
+speech, when&mdash;replying to the temperate but firm Union utterances of Mr.
+Hale&mdash;the Georgia Senator said: "Sir, I do not believe there will be any
+War; but if War is to come, let it come; we will meet the Senator from
+New Hampshire and all the myrmidons of Abolitionism and Black
+Republicanism everywhere upon our own soil; and, in the language of a
+distinguished member from Ohio in relation to the Mexican War, we will
+'welcome you with bloody hands to hospitable graves.'"</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, in order to encourage the revolting States to the
+speedy commission of overt acts of Rebellion and violence, that would
+precipitate War without a peradventure, utterances fell from Southern
+lips, in the National Senate Chamber, like those of Mr. Wigfall, when he
+said, during this first day of the debate: "Frederick the Great, on one
+occasion, when he had trumped up an old title to some of the adjacent
+territory, quietly put himself in possession and then offered to treat.
+Were I a South Carolinian, as I am a Texan, and I knew that my State was
+going out of the Union, and that this Government would attempt to use
+force, I would, at the first moment that that fact became manifest,
+seize upon the Forts and the arms and the munitions of war, and raise
+the cry 'To your tents, O Israel, and to the God of battles be this
+issue!"</p>
+
+<p>And, as we have already seen, the Rebels of the South were not slow in
+following the baleful advice to the letter. But it was not many days
+after this utterance when the Conspirators against the Union evidently
+began to fear that the ground for Rebellion, upon which they had planted
+themselves, would be taken from under their feet by the impulse of
+Compromise and Concession which stirred so strongly the fraternal spirit
+of the North. That peaceful impulse must be checked and exasperated by
+sneers and impossible demands. Hence, on December 12th we find one of
+the most active and favorite mouthpieces of Treason, Mr. Wigfall,
+putting forth such demands, in his most offensive manner.</p>
+
+<p>Said he: "If the two Senators from New York (Seward and King), the
+Senator from Ohio (Wade), the two Senators from Illinois (Douglas and
+Trumbull), the Senator from New Hampshire (Hale), the Senator from
+Maine, and others who are regarded as representative men, who have
+denied that by the Constitution of the United States, Slaves are
+recognized as Property; who have urged and advocated those acts which we
+regard as aggressive on the part of the People&mdash;if they will rise here,
+and say in their places, that they desire to propose amendments to the
+Constitution, and beg that we will vote for them; that they will, in
+good faith, go to their respective constituencies and urge the
+ratification; that they believe, if these Gulf States will suspend their
+action, that those amendments will be ratified and carried out in good
+faith; that they will cease preaching this 'irrepressible conflict'; and
+if, in those amendments, it is declared that Slaves are Property, that
+they shall be delivered up upon demand; and that they will assure us
+that Abolition societies shall be abolished; that Abolition speeches
+shall no longer be made; that we shall have peace and quiet; that we
+shall not be called cut-throats and pirates and murderers; that our
+women shall not be slandered&mdash;these things being said in good faith, the
+Senators begging that we will stay our hand until an honest effort can
+be made, I believe that there is a prospect of giving them a fair
+consideration!"</p>
+
+<p>Small wonder is it, that this labored and ridiculous piece of
+impertinence was received with ironical laughter on the Republican side
+of the Senate Chamber. And it was in reference to these threats, and
+these preposterous demands&mdash;including the suppression of the right of
+Free Discussion and Liberty of the Press&mdash;that, in the same chamber
+(January 7, 1861) the gallant and eloquent Baker said:</p>
+
+<p>"Your Fathers had fought for that right, and more than that, they had
+declared that the violation of that right was one of the great causes
+which impelled them to the Separation. * * * Sir, the Liberty of the
+Press is the highest safeguard to all Free Government. Ours could not
+exist without it. It is with us, nay, with all men, like a great
+exulting and abounding river, It is fed by the dews of Heaven, which
+distil their sweetest drops to form it. It gushes from the rill, as it
+breaks from the deep caverns of the Earth. It is fed by a thousand
+affluents, that dash from the mountaintop to separate again into a
+thousand bounteous and irrigating rills around. On its broad bosom it
+bears a thousand barks. There, Genius spreads its purpling sail.
+There, Poetry dips its silver oar. There, Art, Invention, Discovery,
+Science, Morality, Religion, may safely and securely float. It wanders
+through every land. It is a genial, cordial source of thought and
+inspiration, wherever it touches, whatever it surrounds. Sir, upon its
+borders, there grows every flower of Grace and every fruit of Truth. I
+am not here to deny that that Stream sometimes becomes a dangerous
+Torrent, and destroys towns and cities upon its bank; but I am here to
+say that without it, Civilization, Humanity, Government, all that makes
+Society itself, would disappear, and the World would return to its
+ancient Barbarism.</p>
+
+<p>"Sir, if that were to be possible, or so thought for a moment, the fine
+conception of the great Poet would be realized. If that were to be
+possible, though but for a moment, Civilization itself would roll the
+wheels of its car backward for two thousand years. Sir, if that were
+so, it would be true that:</p>
+
+<center>
+<table summary="">
+<tr><td>
+
+ 'As one by one in dread Medea's train,<br />
+ Star after Star fades off th' ethereal plain,<br />
+ Thus at her fell approach and secret might,<br />
+ Art after art goes out, and all is night.<br />
+ Philosophy, that leaned on Heaven before,<br />
+ Sinks to her second cause, and is no more.<br />
+ Religion, blushing, veils her sacred fires,<br />
+ And, unawares, Morality expires.'<br />
+
+
+</td></tr>
+</table>
+</center>
+
+
+
+
+<p>"Sir, we will not risk these consequences, even for Slavery; we will not
+risk these consequences even for Union; we will not risk these
+consequences to avoid that Civil War with which you threaten us; that
+War which, you announce so deadly, and which you declare to be
+inevitable. * * * I will never yield to the idea that the great
+Government of this Country shall protect Slavery in any Territory now
+ours, or hereafter to be acquired. It is, in my opinion, a great
+principle of Free Government, not, to be surrendered.</p>
+
+<p>"It is in my judgment, the object of the great battle which we have
+fought, and which we have won. It is, in my poor opinion, the point
+upon which there is concord and agreement between the great masses of
+the North, who may agree in no other political opinion whatever. Be he
+Republican, or Democrat, or Douglas man, or Lincoln man; be he from the
+North, or the West, from Oregon, or from Maine, in my judgment
+nine-tenths of the entire population of the North and West are devoted, in
+the very depths of their hearts, to the great Constitutional idea that
+Freedom is the rule, that Slavery is the exception, that it ought not to
+be extended by virtue of the powers of the Government of the United
+States; and, come weal, come woe, it never shall be.</p>
+
+<p>"But, sir, I add one other thing. When you talk to me about Compromise
+or Concession, I am not sure that I always understand you. Do you mean
+that I am to give up my convictions of right? Armies cannot compel that
+in the breast of a Free People. Do you mean that I am to concede the
+benefits of the political struggle through which we have passed,
+considered politically, only? You are too just and too generous to ask
+that. Do you mean that we are to deny the great principle upon which
+our political action has been based? You know we cannot. But if you
+mean by Compromise and Concession to ask us to see whether we have not
+been hasty, angry, passionate, excited, and in many respects violated
+your feelings, your character, your right of property, we will look;
+and, as I said yesterday, if we have, we will undo it. Allow me to say
+again, if there be any lawyer or any Court that will advise us that our
+laws are unconstitutional, we will repeal them.</p>
+
+<p>"Now as to territory. I will not yield one inch to Secession; but there
+are things that I will yield, and there are things to which I will
+yield. It is somewhere told that when Harold of England received a
+messenger from a brother with whom he was at variance, to inquire on
+what terms reconciliation and peace could be effected between brothers,
+he replied in a gallant and generous spirit in a few words, 'the terms
+I offer are the affection of a brother; and the Earldom of
+Northumberland.' And, said the Envoy, as he marched up the Hall amid
+the warriors that graced the state of the King, 'if Tosti, thy brother,
+agree to this, what terms will you allow to his ally and friend,
+Hadrada, the giant.' 'We will allow,' said Harold, 'to Hadrada, the
+giant, seven feet of English ground, and if he be, as they say, a giant,
+some few inches more!' and, as he spake, the Hall rang with acclamation.</p>
+
+<p>"Sir, in that spirit I speak. I follow, at a humble distance, the ideas
+and the words of Clay, illustrious, to be venerated, and honored, and
+remembered, forever. * * * He said&mdash;I say: that I will yield no inch,
+no word, to the threat of Secession, unconstitutional, revolutionary,
+dangerous, unwise, at variance with the heart and the hope of all
+mankind save themselves. To that I yield nothing; but if States loyal
+to the Constitution, if people magnanimous and just, desiring a return
+of fraternal feeling, shall come to us and ask for Peace, for permanent,
+enduring peace and affection, and say, 'What will you grant? I say to
+them, 'Ask all that a gentleman ought to propose, and I will yield all
+that a gentleman ought to offer.' Nay, more: if you are galled because
+we claim the right to prohibit Slavery in territory now Free, or in any
+Territory which acknowledges our jurisdiction, we will evade&mdash;I speak
+but for myself&mdash;I will aid in evading that question; I will agree to
+make it all States, and let the People decide at once. I will agree to
+place them in that condition where the prohibition of Slavery will never
+be necessary to justify ourselves to our consciences or to our
+constituents. I will agree to anything which is not to force upon me
+the necessity of protecting Slavery in the name of Freedom. To that I
+never can and never will yield."</p>
+
+<p>The speeches of Seward, of Douglas, of Crittenden, of Andrew Johnson, of
+Baker, and others, in behalf of the Union, and those of Benjamin, Davis,
+Wigfall, Lane, and others, in behalf of Secession, did much toward
+fixing the responsibility for the approaching bloody conflict where it
+belonged. The speeches of Andrew Johnson of Tennessee&mdash;who, if he at a
+subsequent period of the Nation's history, proved himself not the
+worthiest son of the Republic, at this critical time, at all events, did
+grand service in the National Senate&mdash;especially had great and good
+effect on the public mind in the Northern and Border States. They were,
+therefore, gall and wormwood to the Secession leaders, who hoped to drag
+the Border States into the great Southern Confederacy of States already
+in process of formation.</p>
+
+<p>Their irritation was shown in threats of personal violence to Mr.
+Johnson, as when Wigfall&mdash;replying February 7th, 1861, to the latter's
+speech, said, "Now if the Senator wishes to denounce Secession and
+Nullification eo nomine, let him go back and denounce Jefferson; let him
+denounce Jackson, if he dare, and go back and look that Tennessee
+Democracy in the face, and see whether they will content themselves with
+riddling his effigy!"</p>
+
+<p>It would seem also, from another part of Wigfall's reply, that the
+speeches of Union Senators had been so effective that a necessity was
+felt on the part of the Southern Conspirators to still further attempt
+to justify Secession by shifting the blame to Northern shoulders, for,
+while referring to the Presidential canvass of 1860&mdash;and the attitude of
+the Southern Secession leaders during that exciting period&mdash;he said:
+"We (Breckinridge-Democrats) gave notice, both North and South, that if
+Abraham Lincoln was elected, this Union was dissolved. I never made a
+speech during the canvass without asserting that fact. * * * Then, I
+say, that our purpose was not to dissolve the Union; but the dire
+necessity has been put upon us. The question is, whether we shall live
+longer in a Union in which a Party, hostile to us in every respect, has
+the power in Congress, in the Executive department, and in the Electoral
+Colleges&mdash;a Party who will have the power even in the Judiciary. We
+think it is not safe. We say that each State has the clear indisputable
+right to withdraw if she sees fit; and six of the States have already
+withdrawn, and one other State is upon the eve of withdrawing, if she
+has not already done so. How far this will spread no man can tell!"</p>
+
+<p>As tending to show the peculiar mixture of brag, cajolery, and threats,
+involved in the attitude of the South, as expressed by the same favorite
+Southern mouthpiece, toward the Border-States on the one hand, and the
+Middle and New England States on the other, a further extract from this
+(February 7th) speech of the Texan Senator may be of interest. Said he:</p>
+
+<p>"With exports to the amount of hundreds of millions of dollars, our
+imports must be the same. With a lighter Tariff than any people ever
+undertook to live under, we could have larger revenue. We would be able
+to stand Direct Taxation to a greater extent than any people ever could
+before, since the creation of the World. We feel perfectly competent to
+meet all issues that may be presented, either by hostility from abroad
+or treason at home. So far as the Border-States are concerned, it is a
+matter that concerns them alone. Should they confederate with us,
+beyond all doubt New England machinery will be worked with the water
+power of Tennessee, of Kentucky, of Virginia and of Maryland; the Tariff
+laws that now give New England the monopoly in the thirty-three States,
+will give to these Border States a monopoly in the Slave-holding States.
+Should the non-Slave-holding States choose to side against us in
+organizing their Governments, and cling to their New England brethren,
+the only result will be, that the meat, the horses, the hemp, and the
+grain, which we now buy in Pennsylvania, in Ohio, in Indiana and
+Illinois, will be purchased in Kentucky and in Western Virginia and in
+Missouri. Should Pennsylvania stand out, the only result will be, that
+the iron which is now dug in Pennsylvania, will be dug in the mountains
+of Tennessee and of Virginia and of Kentucky and of North Carolina.
+These things we know.</p>
+
+<p>"We feel no anxiety at all, so far as money or men are concerned. We
+desire War with nobody; we intend to make no War; but we intend to live
+under just such a Government as we see fit. Six States have left this
+Union, and others are going to leave it simply because they choose to do
+it; that is all. We do not ask your consent; we do not wish it. We
+have revoked our ratification of the Treaty commonly known as the
+Constitution of the United States; a treaty for common defense and
+general welfare; and we shall be perfectly willing to enter into another
+Treaty with you, of peace and amity. Reject the olive branch and offer
+us the sword, and we accept it; we have not the slightest objection.
+Upon that subject we feel as the great William Lowndes felt upon another
+important subject, the Presidency, which he said was neither to be
+sought nor declined. When you invade our soil, look to your own
+borders. You say that you have too many people, too many towns, too
+dense a population, for us to invade you. I say to you Senators, that
+there is nothing that ever stops the march of an invading force, except
+a desert. The more populous a country, the more easy it is to subsist
+an army."</p>
+
+<p>After declaring that&mdash;"Not only are our non-Slaveholders loyal, but even
+our Negroes are. We have no apprehensions whatever of insurrection&mdash;not
+the slightest. We can arm our negroes, and leave them at home, when we
+are temporarily absent"&mdash;Mr. Wigfall proceeded to say: "We may as well
+talk plainly about this matter. This is probably the last time I shall
+have an opportunity of addressing you. There is another thing that an
+invading army cannot do. It cannot burn up plantations. You can pull
+down fences, but the Negroes will put them up the next morning. The
+worst fuel that ever a man undertook to make fire with, is dirt; it will
+not burn. Now I have told you what an invading army cannot do. Suppose
+I reverse the picture and tell you what it can do. An invading army in
+an enemy's country, where there is a dense population, can subsist
+itself at a very little cost; it does not always pay for what it gets.
+An invading army can burn down towns; an invading army can burn down
+manufactories; and it can starve operatives. It can do all these
+things. But an Invading army, and an army to defend a Country, both
+require a military chest. You may bankrupt every man south of North
+Carolina, so that his credit is reduced to such a point that he could
+not discount a note for thirty dollars, at thirty days; but the next
+autumn those Cotton States will have just as much money and as much
+credit as they had before. They pick money off the cotton plant. Every
+time that a Negro touches a cotton-pod with his hand, he pulls a piece
+of silver out of it, and he drops it into the basket in which it is
+carried to the gin-house. It is carried to the packing screw. A bale
+of cotton rolls out&mdash;in other words, five ten-dollar pieces roll
+out&mdash;covered with canvas. We shall never again make less than five million
+bales of cotton. * * * We can produce five million bales of cotton,
+every bale worth fifty dollars, which is the lowest market price it has
+been for years past. We shall import a bale of something else, for
+every bale of cotton that we export, and that bale will be worth fifty
+dollars. We shall find no difficulty under a War-Tariff in raising an
+abundance of money. We have been at Peace for a very long time, We are
+very prosperous. Our planters use their cotton, not to buy the
+necessaries of life, but for the superfluities, which they can do
+without. The States themselves have a mine of wealth in the loyalty and
+the wealth of their citizens. Georgia, Mississippi, any one of those
+States can issue its six per cent. bonds tomorrow, and receive cotton in
+payment to the extent almost of the entire crop. They can first borrow
+from their own citizens; they can tax them to an almost unlimited
+extent; and they can raise revenue from a Tariff to an almost unlimited
+extent.</p>
+
+<p>"How will it be with New England? where will their revenue come from?
+From your Custom-houses? what do you export? You have been telling us
+here for the last quarter of a century, that you cannot manufacture,
+even for the home market, under the Tariffs which we have given you.
+When this Tariff ceases to operate in your favor, and you have to pay
+for coming into our markets, what will you export? When your machinery
+ceases to move, and your operatives are turned out, will you tax your
+broken capitalist or your starving operative? When the navigation laws
+cease to operate, what will become of your shipping interest? You are
+going to blockade our ports, you say. That is a very innocent game; and
+you suppose we shall sit quietly down and submit to a blockade. I speak
+not of foreign interference, for we look not for it. We are just as
+competent to take Queen Victoria and Louis Napoleon under our
+protection, as they are to take us; and they are a great deal more
+interested to-day in receiving cotton from our ports than we are in
+shipping it. You may lock up every bale of cotton within the limits of
+the eight Cotton States, and not allow us to export one for three years,
+and we shall not feel it further than our military resources are
+concerned. Exhaust the supply of cotton in Europe for one week, and all
+Europe is in revolution.</p>
+
+<p>"These are facts. You will blockade us! Do you suppose we shall do
+nothing, even upon the sea? How many letters of marque and reprisal
+would it take to put the whole of your ships up at your wharves to rot?
+Will any merchant at Havre, or Liverpool, or any other portion of the
+habitable globe, ship a cargo upon a New England, or New York, or
+Philadelphia clipper, or other ship, when he knows that the seas are
+swarming with letters of marque and reprisal? Why the mere apprehension
+of such a thing will cut you out of the Carrying Trade of the civilized
+World. * * * I speak not of the absurdity of the position that you can
+blockade our ports, admitting at the same time that we are in the Union.
+Blockade is a remedy, as all writers on International law say, against a
+Foreign Power with whom you are at War. You cannot use a blockade
+against your own people. An embargo even, you cannot use. That is a
+remedy against a Foreign Nation with whom you expect to be at War. You
+must treat us as in the Union, or out of it. We have gone out. We are
+willing to live at peace with you; but, as sure as fate, whenever any
+flag comes into one of our ports, that has thirty-three stars upon it,
+that flag will be fired at. Displaying a flag with stars which we have
+plucked from that bright galaxy, is an insult to the State within whose
+waters that flag is displayed. You cannot enforce the laws without
+Coercion, and you cannot Coerce without War.</p>
+
+<p>"These matters, then, can be settled. How? By withdrawing your troops;
+admitting our right to Self-government clearly, unqualifiedly. Do this,
+and there is no difficulty about it. You say that you will not do it.
+Very well; we have no objection&mdash;none whatever. That is Coercion. When
+you have attempted it, you will find that you have made War. These,
+Senators, are facts. I come here to plead for Peace; but I have seen so
+much and felt so much, that I am becoming at last, to tell the plain
+truth of the matter, rather indifferent as to which way the thing turns.
+If you want War, you can have it. If you want Peace, you can get it;
+but I plead not for Peace."</p>
+
+<p>Meanwhile the Seceding States of the South were strengthening their
+attitude by Confederation. On February 4, 1861, the Convention of
+Seceding States, called by the South Carolina Convention at the time of
+her Secession, met, in pursuance of that call, at Montgomery, Alabama,
+and on the 9th adopted a Provisional Constitution and organized a
+Provisional Government by the election of Jefferson Davis of
+Mississippi, as President, and Alexander H. Stephens of Georgia, as
+Vice-President; to serve until a Presidential election could be held by
+the people of the Confederacy.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [At a later day, March 11, 1861, a permanent Constitution for the
+ "Confederate States" was adopted, and, in the Fall of the same
+ year, Messrs. Davis and Stephens were elected by popular vote, for
+ the term of six years ensuing, as President and Vice-President,
+ respectively, of the Confederacy.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Mr. Davis almost at once left Jackson, Mississippi, for Montgomery,
+where he arrived and delivered his Inaugural, February 17, having
+received on his road thither a succession of ovations from the
+enthusiastic Rebels, to which he had responded with no less than
+twenty-five speeches, very similar in tone to those made in the United States
+Senate by Mr. Wigfall and others of that ilk&mdash;breathing at once defiance
+and hopefulness, while admitting the difficulties in the way of the new
+Confederacy.</p>
+
+<p>"It may be," said he, at Jackson, "that we will be confronted by War;
+that the attempt will be made to blockade our ports, to starve us out;
+but they (the Union men of the North) know little of the Southern heart,
+of Southern endurance. No amount of privation could force us to remain
+in a Union on unequal terms. England and France would not allow our
+great staple to be dammed up within our present limits; the starving
+thousands in their midst would not allow it. We have nothing to
+apprehend from Blockade. But if they attempt invasion by land, we must
+take the War out of our territory. If War must come, it must be upon
+Northern, and not upon Southern soil. In the meantime, if they were
+prepared to grant us Peace, to recognize our equality, all is well."</p>
+
+<p>And, in his speech at Stevenson, Alabama, said he "Your Border States
+will gladly come into the Southern Confederacy within sixty days, as we
+will be their only friends. England will recognize us, and a glorious
+future is before us. The grass will grow in the Northern cities, where
+the pavements have been worn off by the tread of Commerce. We will
+carry War where it is easy to advance&mdash;where food for the sword and
+torch await our Armies in the densely populated cities; and though they
+may come and spoil our crops, we can raise them as before; while they
+cannot rear the cities which took years of industry and millions of
+money to build."</p>
+
+<p>Very different in tone to these, were the kindly and sensible utterances
+of Mr. Lincoln on his journey from Springfield to Washington, about the
+same time, for Inauguration as President of the United States. Leaving
+Springfield, Illinois, February 11th, he had pathetically said:</p>
+
+<p>"My friends: No one, not in my position, can realize the sadness I feel
+at this parting. To this people I owe all that I am. Here I have lived
+more than a quarter of a century. Here my children were born, and here
+one of them lies buried. I know not how soon I shall see you again. I
+go to assume a task more difficult than that which has devolved upon any
+other man since the days of Washington. He never would have succeeded
+except for the aid of Divine Providence, upon which he at all times
+relied. I feel that I cannot succeed without the same Divine blessing
+which sustained him; and on the same Almighty Being I place my reliance
+for support. And I hope you, my friends, will all pray that I may
+receive that Divine assistance, without which I cannot succeed, but with
+which success is certain. Again I bid you an affectionate farewell."</p>
+
+<p>At Indianapolis, that evening, the eve of his birthday anniversary,
+after thanking the assembled thousands for their "magnificent welcome,"
+and defining the words "Coercion" and "Invasion"&mdash;at that time so
+loosely used&mdash;he continued: "But if the United States should merely hold
+and retake her own Forts and other property, and collect the duties on
+foreign importation, or even withhold the mails from places where they
+were habitually violated, would any or all of these things be 'Invasion'
+or 'Coercion'? Do our professed lovers of the Union, who spitefully
+resolve that they will resist Coercion and Invasion, understand that
+such things as these on the part of the United States would be
+'Coercion' or 'Invasion' of a State? If so, their idea of means to
+preserve the object of their great affection would seem to be
+exceedingly thin and airy."</p>
+
+<p>At Columbus, Ohio, he spoke in a like calm, conservative, reasoning way
+&mdash;with the evident purpose of throwing oil on the troubled waters&mdash;when
+he said: "I have not maintained silence from any want of real anxiety.
+It is a good thing that there is no more than anxiety; for there is
+nothing going wrong. It is a consoling circumstance that, when we look
+out, there is nothing that really hurts anybody. We entertain different
+views upon political questions; but nobody is suffering anything. This
+is a consoling circumstance; and from it we may conclude that all we
+want is time, patience, and a reliance on that God who has never
+forsaken this People."</p>
+
+<p>So, too, at Pittsburg, Pa., February 15th, he said, of "our friends," as
+he termed them, the Secessionists: "Take even their own views of the
+questions involved, and there is nothing to justify the course they are
+pursuing. I repeat, then, there is no crisis, except such an one as may
+be gotten up at any time by turbulent men, aided by designing
+politicians. My advice to them, under the circumstances, is to keep
+cool. If the great American People only keep their temper both sides of
+the line, the trouble will come to an end, and the question which now
+distracts the Country be settled, just as surely as all other
+difficulties, of a like character, which have been originated in this
+Government, have been adjusted. Let the people on both sides keep their
+self-possession, and, just as other clouds have cleared away in due
+time, so will this great Nation continue to prosper as heretofore."</p>
+
+<p>And toward the end of that journey, on the 22nd of
+February&mdash;Washington's Birthday&mdash;in the Independence Hall at Philadelphia, after
+eloquently affirming his belief that "the great principle or idea that
+kept this Confederacy so long together was * * * that sentiment in the
+Declaration of Independence which gave Liberty not alone to the People
+of this Country, but" he hoped "to the World, for all future time * * *
+which gave promise that, in due time, the weight would be lifted from
+the shoulders of all men"&mdash;he added, in the same firm, yet temperate and
+reassuring vein: "Now, my friends, can this Country be saved on that
+basis? If it can, I will consider myself one of the happiest men in the
+world, if I can help to save it. If it cannot be saved on that basis,
+it will be truly awful. But, if this Country cannot be saved without
+giving up that principle, I was about to say I would rather be
+assassinated on this spot than surrender it. Now in my view of the
+present aspect of affairs, there need be no bloodshed or War. There is
+no necessity for it. I am not in favor of such a course; and I may say,
+in advance, that there will be no bloodshed, unless it be forced upon
+the Government, and then it will be compelled to act in self-defense. *
+* * I have said nothing but what I am willing to live by, and, if it be
+the pleasure of Almighty God, to die by."</p>
+
+<p>Thus, as he progressed on that memorable journey from his home in
+Illinois, through Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Columbus, Pittsburgh,
+Cleveland, Erie, Buffalo, Albany, New York, Trenton, Newark,
+Philadelphia, and Harrisburg&mdash;amid the prayers and blessings and
+acclamations of an enthusiastic and patriotic people&mdash;he uttered words
+of wise conciliation and firm moderation such as beseemed the high
+functions and tremendous responsibilities to which the voice of that
+liberty&mdash;and union-loving people had called him, and this too, with a
+full knowledge, when he made the Philadelphia speech, that the enemies
+of the Republic had already planned to assassinate him before he could
+reach Washington.</p>
+
+<p>The prudence of his immediate friends, fortunately defeated the
+murderous purpose&mdash;and by the simple device of taking the regular night
+express from Philadelphia instead of a special train next day&mdash;to
+Washington, he reached the National Capital without molestation early on
+the morning of the 23rd of February.</p>
+
+<p>That morning, after Mr. Lincoln's arrival, in company with Mr. Lovejoy,
+the writer visited him at Willard's Hotel. During the interview both
+urged him to "Go right along, protect the property of the Country, and
+put down the Rebellion, no matter at what cost in men and money." He
+listened with grave attention, and said little, but very clearly
+indicated his approval of all the sentiments thus expressed&mdash;and then,
+with the same firm and manly and cheerful faith in the outcome, he
+added: "As the Country has placed me at the helm of the Ship, I'll try
+to steer her through."</p>
+
+<p>The spirit in which he proposed to accomplish this superhuman task, was
+shown when he told the Southern people through the Civic authorities of
+Washington on the 27th of February&mdash;When the latter called upon
+him&mdash;that he had no desire or intention to interfere with any of their
+Constitutional rights&mdash;that they should have all their rights under the
+Constitution, "not grudgingly, but fully and fairly." And what was the
+response of the South to this generous and conciliatory message?
+Personal sneers&mdash;imputations of Northern cowardice&mdash;boasts of Southern
+prowess&mdash;scornful rejection of all compromise&mdash;and an insolent challenge
+to the bloody issue of arms!</p>
+
+<p>Said Mr. Wigfall, in the United States Senate, on March 2d, alluding to
+Mr. Lincoln, "I do not think that a man who disguises himself in a
+soldier's cloak and a Scotch cap (a more thorough disguise could not be
+assumed by such a man) and makes his entry between day and day, into the
+Capital of the Country that he is to govern&mdash;I hardly think that he is
+going to look War sternly in the face.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [Had Mr. Wigfall been able at this time to look four years into the
+ future and behold the downfall of the Southern Rebellion, the
+ flight of its Chieftains, and the capture of Jefferson Davis while
+ endeavoring to escape, with his body enclosed in a wrapper and a
+ woman's shawl over his head, as stated by Lieutenant-Colonel Stuart
+ of Jefferson Davis's Staff, p. 756, vol. ii., Greeley's American
+ Conflict&mdash;he would hardly have retailed this slander.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>"I look for nothing else than that the Commissioners from the
+Confederated States will be received here and recognized by Abraham
+Lincoln. I will now predict that this Republican Party that is going to
+enforce the Laws, preserve the Union, and collect Revenue, will never
+attempt anything so silly; and that instead of taking Forts, the troops
+will be withdrawn from those which we now have. See if this does not
+turn out to be so, in less than a week or ten days."</p>
+
+<p>In the same insulting diatribe, he said: "It is very easy for men to
+bluster who know there is going to be no danger. Four or five million
+people living in a territory that extends from North Carolina down to
+the Rio Grande, who have exports to above three hundred million dollars,
+whose ports cannot be blockaded, but who can issue letters of marque and
+reprisal, and sweep your commerce from the seas, and who will do it, are
+not going to be trifled with by that sensible Yankee nation. Mark my
+words. I did think, at one time, there was going to be War; I do not
+think so now. * * * The Star of the West swaggered into Charleston
+harbor, received a blow planted full in the face, and staggered out.
+Your flag has been insulted; redress it if you dare! You have submitted
+to it for two months, and you will submit to it for ever. * * * We
+have dissolved the Union; mend it if you can; cement it with blood; try
+the experiment! we do not desire War; we wish to avoid it. * * * This
+we say; and if you choose to settle this question by the Sword, we feel,
+we know, that we have the Right. We interfere with you in no way. We
+ask simply that you will not interfere with us. * * * You tell us you
+will keep us in the Union. Try the experiment!"</p>
+
+<p>And then, with brutal frankness, he continued: "Now, whether what are
+called The Crittenden Resolutions will produce satisfaction in some of
+these Border States, or not, I am unaware; but I feel perfectly sure
+they would not be entertained upon the Gulf. As to the Resolutions
+which the Peace Congress has offered us, we might as well make a clean
+breast of it. If those Resolutions were adopted, and ratified by three
+fourths of the States of this Union, and no other cause ever existed, I
+make the assertion that the seven States now out of the Union, would go
+out upon that."</p>
+
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+<a name="clay"></a>
+<center>
+<img alt="p132-clay.jpg (78K)" src="images/p132-clay.jpg" height="809" width="585">
+</center>
+<br><br><br>
+<a name="ch8"></a>
+<br><br>
+<center><h2>
+ CHAPTER VIII.<br><br>
+
+ THE REJECTED OLIVE BRANCH.</h2></center><br>
+
+
+<p>While instructive, it will also not be devoid of interest, to pause
+here, and examine the nature of the Crittenden Resolutions, and also the
+Resolutions of the Peace Congress, which, we have seen, were spurned by
+the Secession leaders, through their chief mouthpiece in the United
+States Senate.</p>
+
+<p>The Crittenden Compromise Resolutions * were in these words:</p>
+
+<p>"A Joint Resolution proposing certain Amendments to the Constitution of
+the United States:</p>
+
+<p>"Whereas, serious and alarming dissensions have arisen between the
+Northern and the Southern States, concerning the Rights and security of
+the Rights of the Slaveholding States, and especially their Rights in
+the common territory of the United States; and whereas, it is eminently
+desirable and proper that these dissensions, which now threaten the very
+existence of this Union, should be permanently quieted and settled by
+Constitutional provisions which shall do equal justice to all Sections,
+and thereby restore to the People that peace and good-will which ought
+to prevail between all the citizens of the United States; Therefore:</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
+States of America, in Congress assembled, (two thirds of both Houses
+concurring), the following articles be, and are hereby proposed and
+submitted as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, which
+shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of said
+Constitution, when ratified by Conventions of three-fourths of the
+several States:</p>
+
+<p>"Article I. In all the territory of the United States now held, or
+hereafter to be acquired, situate north of latitude 36 30', Slavery or
+involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, is prohibited,
+while such territory shall remain under Territorial government. In all
+the territory south of said line of latitude, Slavery of the African
+race is hereby recognized as existing, and shall not be interfered with
+by Congress, but shall be protected as Property by all the departments
+of the Territorial government during its continuance. And when any
+Territory, north or south of said line, within such boundaries as
+Congress may prescribe, shall contain the population requisite for a
+member of Congress, according to the then Federal ratio of
+representation of the People of the United States, it shall, if its own
+form of government be republican, be admitted into the Union, on an
+equal footing with the original States; with or without Slavery, as the
+Constitution of such new State may provide.</p>
+
+<p>"Article II. Congress shall have no power to abolish Slavery in places
+under its exclusive jurisdiction, and situate within the limits of
+States that permit the holding of Slaves.</p>
+
+<p>"Article III. Congress shall have no power to abolish Slavery within
+the District of Columbia; so long as it exists in the adjoining States
+of Virginia and Maryland, or either, nor without the consent of the
+inhabitants, nor without just compensation first made to such owners of
+Slaves as do not consent to such abolishment. Nor shall Congress, at
+any time, prohibit officers of the Federal government, or members of
+Congress whose duties require them to be in said District, from bringing
+with them their Slaves, and holding them as such during the time their
+duties may require them to remain there, and afterward taking them from
+the District.</p>
+
+<p>"Article IV. Congress shall have no power to prohibit or hinder the
+Transportation of Slaves from one State to another, or to a Territory in
+which Slaves are, by law, permitted to be held, whether that
+transportation be by land, navigable rivers, or by the sea.</p>
+
+<p>"Article V. That in addition to the provisions of the third paragraph
+of the second section of the fourth article of the Constitution of the
+United States, Congress shall have power to provide by law, and it shall
+be its duty to provide, that the United States shall pay to the owner
+who shall apply for it, the full value of his Fugitive Slaves in all
+cases where the Marshal, or other officer whose duty it was to arrest
+said Fugitive, was prevented from so doing by violence or intimidation,
+or where, after arrest, said Fugitive was rescued by force, and the
+owner thereby prevented and obstructed in the pursuit of his remedy for
+the recovery of his Fugitive Slave under the said clause of the
+Constitution and the laws made in pursuance thereof.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> ["No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws
+ thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any Law or
+ Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but
+ shall be delivered up on claim of the Party to whom such Service or
+ Labour may be due."&mdash;Art. IV., Sec. 2, P 3, U. S. Constitution.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>"And in all such cases, when the United States shall pay for such
+Fugitive, they shall have the Right, in their own name, to sue the
+county in which said violence, intimidation, or rescue, was committed,
+and recover from it, with interest and damages, the amount paid by them
+for said Fugitive Slave. And the said county, after it has paid said
+amount to the United States, may, for its indemnity, sue and recover
+from the wrong-doers or rescuers by whom the owner was prevented from
+the recovery of his Fugitive Slave, in like manner as the owner himself
+might have sued and recovered.</p>
+
+<p>"Article VI. No future amendment of the Constitution shall affect the
+five preceding articles; nor the third paragraph of the second section
+of the first article of the Constitution, nor the third paragraph of
+the second section of the fourth article of said Constitution; and no
+amendment shall be made to the Constitution which shall authorize or
+give to Congress any power to abolish or interfere with Slavery in any
+of the States by whose laws it is or may be, allowed or permitted.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> ["Representatives and Direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the
+ several States which may be included within this Union, according
+ to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to
+ the whole Number of Free Persons, including those bound to Service
+ for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not Taxed, three-fifths
+ of all Other Persons," etc.&mdash;Art. 1., Sec. 2, P 3, U. S.
+ Constitution.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>"And whereas, also, besides those causes of dissension embraced in the
+foregoing amendments proposed to the Constitution of the United States,
+there are others which come within the jurisdiction of Congress, and may
+be remedied by its legislative power; And whereas it is the desire of
+Congress, as far as its power will extend, to remove all just cause for
+the popular discontent and agitation which now disturb the peace of the
+Country and threaten the stability of its Institutions; Therefore:</p>
+
+<p>"1. Resolved by the Senate and house of Representatives in Congress
+assembled, that the laws now in force for the recovery of Fugitive
+Slaves are in strict pursuance of the plain and mandatory provisions of
+the Constitution, and have been sanctioned as valid and Constitutional
+by the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States; that the
+Slaveholding States are entitled to the faithful observance and
+execution of those laws; and that they ought not to be repealed, or so
+modified or changed as to impair their efficiency; and that laws ought
+to be made for the punishment of those who attempt, by rescue of the
+Slave, or other illegal means, to hinder or defeat the due execution of
+said laws.</p>
+
+<p>"2. That all State laws which conflict with the Fugitive Slave Acts of
+Congress, or any other Constitutional Acts of Congress, or which, in
+their operation, impede, hinder, or delay, the free course and due
+execution of any of said Acts, are null and void by the plain provisions
+of the Constitution of the United States; yet those State laws, void as
+they are, have given color to practices, and led to consequences, which
+have obstructed the due administration and execution of Acts of
+Congress, and especially the Acts for the delivery of Fugitive Slaves;
+and have thereby contributed much to the discord and commotion now
+prevailing. Congress, therefore, in the present perilous juncture, does
+not deem it improper, respectfully and earnestly, to recommend the
+repeal of those laws to the several States which have enacted them, or
+such legislative corrections or explanations of them as may prevent
+their being used or perverted to such mischievous purposes.</p>
+
+<p>"3. That the Act of the 18th of September, 1850, commonly called the
+Fugitive Slave Law, ought to be so amended as to make the fee of the
+Commissioner, mentioned in the eighth section of the Act, equal in
+amount in the cases decided by him, whether his decision be in favor of,
+or against the claimant. And, to avoid misconstruction, the last clause
+of the fifth section of said Act, which authorizes the person holding a
+warrant for the arrest or detention of a Fugitive Slave to summon to his
+aid the posse comitatus, and which declares it to be the duty of all
+good citizens to assist him in its execution, ought to be so amended as
+to expressly limit the authority and duty to cases in which there shall
+be resistance, or danger of resistance or rescue.</p>
+
+<p>"4. That the laws for the suppression of the African Slave Trade, and
+especially those prohibiting the importation of Slaves into the United
+States, ought to be more effectual, and ought to be thoroughly executed;
+and all further enactments necessary to those ends ought to be promptly
+made."</p>
+
+<p>
+The Peace Conference, or "Congress," it may here be mentioned, was
+called, by action of the Legislature of Virginia, to meet at Washington,
+February 4, 1861. The invitation was extended to all of such "States of
+this Confederacy * * * whether Slaveholding or Non-Slaveholding, as are
+willing to unite with Virginia in an earnest effort to adjust the
+present unhappy controversies in the spirit in which the Constitution
+was originally formed, and consistently with its principles, so as to
+afford to the people of the Slaveholding States adequate guarantees for
+the security of their rights"&mdash;such States to be represented by
+Commissioners "to consider, and, if practicable, agree upon some
+suitable adjustment."</p>
+
+<p>The Conference, or "Congress," duly convened, at that place and time,
+and organized by electing ex-President John Tyler, of Virginia, its
+President. This Peace Congress&mdash;which comprised 133 Commissioners,
+representing the States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts,
+Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware,
+Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio,
+Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Wisconsin and Kansas&mdash;remained in session until
+February 27, 1861&mdash;and then submitted the result of its labors to
+Congress, with the request that Congress "will submit it to Conventions
+in the States, as Article Thirteen of the Amendments to the Constitution
+of the United States, in the following shape:</p>
+
+<p>"Section 1. In all the present territory of the United States, north of
+the parallel of 36 30' of north latitude, Involuntary Servitude, except
+in punishment of crime, is prohibited. In all the present territory
+south of that line, the status of Persons held to Involuntary Service or
+Labor, as it now exists, shall not be changed; nor shall any law be
+passed by Congress or the Territorial Legislature to hinder or prevent
+the taking of such Persons from any of the States of this Union to said
+Territory, nor to impair the Rights arising from said relation; but the
+same shall be subject to judicial cognizance in the Federal Courts,
+according to the course of the common law. When any Territory north or
+south of said line, within such boundary as Congress may prescribe,
+shall contain a population equal to that required for a member of
+Congress, it shall, if its form of government be republican, be admitted
+into the Union on an equal footing with the original States, with or
+without Involuntary Servitude, as the Constitution of such State may
+provide.</p>
+
+<p>"Section 2. No territory shall be acquired by the United States, except
+by discovery and for naval and commercial stations, depots, and transit
+routes, without the concurrence of a majority of all the Senators from
+States which allow Involuntary Servitude, and a majority of all the
+Senators from States which prohibit that relation; nor shall Territory
+be acquired by treaty, unless the votes of a majority of the Senators
+from each class of States hereinbefore mentioned be cast as a part of
+the two-thirds majority necessary to the ratification of such treaty.</p>
+
+<p>"Section 3. Neither the Constitution, nor any amendment thereof, shall
+be construed to give Congress power to regulate, abolish, or control,
+within any State, the relation established or recognized by the laws
+thereof touching Persons held to Labor or Involuntary Service therein,
+nor to interfere with or abolish Involuntary Service in the District of
+Columbia without the consent of Maryland, and without the consent of the
+owners, or making the owners who do not consent just compensation; nor
+the power to interfere with or prohibit Representatives and others from
+bringing with them to the District of Columbia, retaining, and taking
+away, Persons so held to Labor or Service; nor the power to interfere
+with or abolish Involuntary Service in places under the exclusive
+jurisdiction of the United States within those States and Territories
+where the same is established or recognized; nor the power to prohibit
+the removal or transportation of Persons held to Labor or Involuntary
+Service in any State or Territory of the United States to any other
+State or Territory thereof where it is established or recognized by law
+or usage; and the right during transportation, by sea or river, of
+touching at ports, shores, and landings, and of landing in case of
+distress, shall exist; but not the right of transit in or through any
+State or Territory, or of sale or traffic, against the laws thereof.
+Nor shall Congress have power to authorize any higher rate of taxation
+on Persons held to Labor or Service than on land. The bringing into the
+District of Columbia of Persons held to Labor or Service, for sale, or
+placing them in depots to be afterwards transferred to other places for
+sale as merchandize, is prohibited.</p>
+
+<p>"Section 4. The third paragraph of the second section of the fourth
+article of the Constitution shall not be construed to prevent any of the
+States, by appropriate legislation, and through the action of their
+judicial and ministerial officers, from enforcing the delivery of
+Fugitives from Labor to the person to whom such Service or Labor is due.</p>
+
+<p>"Section 5. The Foreign Slave Trade is hereby forever prohibited; and
+it shall be the duty of Congress to pass laws to prevent the importation
+of Slaves, Coolies, or Persons held to Service or Labor, into the United
+States and the Territories from places beyond the limits thereof.</p>
+
+<p>"Section 6. The first, third, and fifth sections, together with this
+section of these amendments, and the third paragraph of the second
+section of the first article of the Constitution, and the third
+paragraph of the second section of the fourth article thereof, shall not
+be amended or abolished without the consent of all the States.</p>
+
+<p>"Section 7. Congress shall provide by law that the United States shall
+pay to the owner the full value of the Fugitive from Labor, in all cases
+where the Marshal, or other officer, whose duty it was to arrest such
+Fugitive, was prevented from so doing by violence or intimidation from
+mobs or riotous assemblages, or when, after arrest, such Fugitive was
+rescued by like violence or intimidation, and the owner thereby deprived
+of the same; and the acceptance of such payment shall preclude the owner
+from further claim to such Fugitive. Congress shall provide by law for
+securing to the citizens of each State the privileges and immunities of
+citizens in the several States."</p>
+
+<p>
+To spurn such propositions as these&mdash;with all the concessions to the
+Slave Power therein contained&mdash;was equivalent to spurning any and all
+propositions that could possibly be made; and by doing this, the
+Seceding States placed themselves&mdash;as they perhaps desired&mdash;in an
+utterly irreconcilable attitude, and hence, to a certain extent, which
+had not entered into their calculations, weakened their "Cause" in the
+eyes of many of their friends in the North, in the Border States, and in
+the World. They had become Implacables. Practically considered, this
+was their great mistake. The Crittenden Compromise Resolutions covered
+and yielded to the Slaveholders of the South all and even more than they
+had ever dared seriously to ask or hope for, and had they been open to
+Conciliation, they could have undoubtedly carried that measure through
+both Houses of Congress and three-fourths of the States.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> ["Its advocates, with good reason, claimed a large majority of the
+ People in its favor, and clamored for its submission to a direct
+ popular vote. Had such a submission been accorded, it is very
+ likely that the greater number of those who voted at all would have
+ voted to ratify it. * * * The 'Conservatives,' so called, were
+ still able to establish this Crittenden Compromise by their own
+ proper strength, had they been disposed so to do. The President
+ was theirs; the Senate strongly theirs; in the House, they had a
+ small majority, as was evidenced in their defeat of John Sherman
+ for Speaker. Had they now come forward and said, with authority:
+ 'Enable us to pass the Crittenden Compromise, and all shall be
+ peace and harmony,' they would have succeeded without difficulty.
+ It was only through the withdrawal of pro-slavery members that the
+ Republicans had achieved an unexpected majority in either House.
+ Had those members chosen to return to the seats still awaiting
+ them, and to support Mr. Crittenden's proposition, they could have
+ carried it without difficulty."&mdash;Vol. 360, Greeley's Am. Conflict.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>But no, they wilfully withdrew their Congressional membership, State by
+State, as each Seceded, and refused all terms save those which involved
+an absolute surrender to them on all points, including the impossible
+claim of the "Right of Secession."</p>
+
+<p>Let us now briefly trace the history of the Compromise measures in the
+two Houses of Congress.</p>
+
+<p>The Crittenden-Compromise Joint-Resolution had been introduced in the
+Senate at the opening of its session and referred to a Select Committee
+of Thirteen, and subsequently, January 16th, 1861, having been reported
+back, came up in that body for action. On that day it was amended by
+inserting the words "now held or hereafter to be acquired" after the
+words "In all the territory of the United States," in the first line of
+Article I., so that it would read as given above. This amendment&mdash;by
+which not only in all territory then belonging to the United States, but
+also by implication in all that might thereafter be acquired, Slavery
+South of 36 30' was to be recognized&mdash;was agreed to by 29 yeas to 21
+nays, as follows:</p>
+
+<p>YEAS.&mdash;Messrs. Baker, Bayard, Benjamin, Bigler, Bragg, Bright,
+Clingman, Crittenden, Douglas, Fitch, Green, Gwin, Hemphill, Hunter,
+Iverson, Johnson of Tennessee, Kennedy, Lane, Mason, Nicholson, Pearce,
+Polk, Powell, Pugh, Rice, Saulsbury, Sebastian, Slidell and Wigfall&mdash;29.</p>
+
+<p>NAYS.&mdash;Messrs. Anthony, Bingham, Cameron, Chandler, Clark, Collamer,
+Dixon, Doolittle, Durkee, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Grimes, Hale, Harlan,
+King, Latham, Seward, Simmons, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Trumbull, Wade and
+Wilson&mdash;24.</p>
+
+<p>The question now recurred upon an amendment, in the nature of a
+substitute, offered by Mr. Clark, to strike out the preamble of the
+Crittenden proposition and all of the resolutions after the word
+"resolved," and insert:</p>
+
+<p>"That the provisions of the Constitution are ample for the preservation
+of the Union, and the protection of all the material interests of the
+Country; that it needs to be obeyed rather than amended; and that an
+extrication from our present dangers is to be looked for in strenuous
+efforts to preserve the peace, protect the public property, and enforce
+the laws, rather than in new Guarantees for particular interests,
+Compromises for particular difficulties, or Concessions to unreasonable
+demands.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That all attempts to dissolve the present Union, or overthrow
+or abandon the present Constitution, with the hope or expectation of
+constructing a new one, are dangerous, illusory, and destructive; that
+in the opinion of the Senate of the United States no such Reconstruction
+is practicable; and, therefore, to the maintenance of the existing Union
+and Constitution should be directed all the energies of all the
+departments of the Government, and the efforts of all good citizens."</p>
+
+<p>
+Before reaching a vote on this amendment, Mr. Anthony, (January 16th)
+made a most conciliatory speech, pointing out such practical objections
+to the Crittenden proposition as occurred to his mind, and then,
+continuing, said: "I believe, Mr. President, that if the danger which
+menaces us is to be avoided at all, it must be by Legislation; which is
+more ready, more certain, and more likely to be satisfactory, than
+Constitutional Amendment. The main difficulty is the Territorial
+question. The demand of the Senators on the other side of the Chamber,
+and of those whom they represent, is that the territory south of the
+line of the Missouri Compromise shall be open to their peculiar
+Property. All this territory, except the Indian Reservation, is within
+the limits of New Mexico; which, for a part of its northern boundary,
+runs up two degrees above that line. This is now a Slave Territory;
+made so by Territorial Legislation; and Slavery exists there, recognized
+and protected. Now, I am willing, as soon as Kansas can be admitted, to
+vote for the admission of New Mexico as a State, with such Constitution
+as the People may adopt. This disposes of all the territory that is
+adapted to Slave Labor or that is claimed by the South. It ought to
+settle the whole question. Surely if we can dispose of all the
+territory that we have, we ought not to quarrel over that which we have
+not, and which we have no very honest way of acquiring. Let us settle
+the difficulties that threaten us now, and not anticipate those which
+may never come. Let the public mind have time to cool * * *. In
+offering to settle this question by the admission of New Mexico, we of
+the North who assent to it propose a great Sacrifice, and offer a large
+Concession.</p>
+
+<p>"* * * But we make the offer in a spirit of Compromise and good
+feeling, which we hope will be reciprocated. * * * I appeal to
+Senators on the other side, when we thus offer to bridge over full
+seven-eighths of the frightful chasm that separates us, will you not
+build the other eighth? When, with outstretched arms, we approach you
+so near that, by reaching out your hands you can clasp ours in the
+fraternal grasp from which they should never be separated, will you,
+with folded arms and closed eyes, stand upon extreme demands which you
+know we cannot accept, and for which, if we did, we could not carry our
+constituents? * * * Together our Fathers achieved the Independence of
+their Country; together they laid the foundations of its greatness and
+its glory; together they constructed this beautiful system under which
+it is our privilege to live, which it is our duty to preserve and to
+transmit. Together we enjoy that privilege; together we must perform
+that duty. I will not believe that, in the madness of popular folly and
+delusion, the most benignant Government that ever blessed humanity is to
+be broken up. I will not believe that this great Power which is
+marching with giant steps toward the first place among the Nations of
+the Earth, is to be turned 'backward on its mighty track.' There are no
+grievances, fancied or real, that cannot be redressed within the Union
+and under the Constitution. There are no differences between us that
+may not be settled if we will take them up in the spirit of those to
+whose places we have succeeded, and the fruits of whose labors we have
+inherited."</p>
+
+<p>And to this more than fair proposition to the Southerners&mdash;to this
+touching appeal in behalf of Peace&mdash;what was the response? Not a word!
+It seemed but to harden their hearts.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [Immediately after Mr. Anthony's appeal to the Southern Senators, a
+ motion was made by Mr. Collamer to postpone the Crittenden
+ Resolutions and take up the Kansas Admission Bill. Here was the
+ chance at once offered to them to respond to that appeal&mdash;to make a
+ first step, as it were. They would not make it. The motion was
+ defeated by 25 yeas to 30 nays&mdash;Messrs. Benjamin and Slidell of
+ Louisiana, Hemphill and Wigfall of Texas, Iverson of Georgia, and
+ Johnson of Arkansas, voting "nay." The question at once recurred
+ on the amendment of Mr. Clark&mdash;being a substitute for the
+ Crittenden Resolutions, declaring in effect all Compromise
+ unnecessary. To let that substitute be adopted, was to insure the
+ failure of the Crittenden proposition. Yet these same six Southern
+ Senators though present, refused to vote, and permitted the
+ substitute to be adopted by 25 yeas to 23 nays. The vote of Mr.
+ Douglas, who had been "called out for an instant into the
+ ante-room, and deprived of the opportunity of voting "&mdash;as he afterwards
+ stated when vainly asking unanimous consent to have his vote
+ recorded among the nays&mdash;would have made it 25 yeas to 24 nays, had
+ he been present and voting, while the votes of the six Southern
+ Senators aforesaid, had they voted, would have defeated the
+ substitute by 25 yeas to 30 nays. Then upon a direct vote on the
+ Crittenden Compromise there would not only have been the 30 in its
+ favor, but the vote of at least one Republican (Baker) in addition,
+ to carry it, and, although that would not have given the necessary
+ two-thirds, yet it would have been a majority handsome enough to
+ have ultimately turned the scales, in both Houses, for a peaceful
+ adjustment of the trouble, and have avoided all the sad
+ consequences which so speedily befell the Nation. But this would
+ not have suited the Treasonable purposes of the Conspirators. Ten
+ days before this they had probably arranged the Programme in this,
+ as well as other matters. Very certain it is that no time was lost
+ by them and their friends in making the best use for their Cause of
+ this vote, in the doubtful States of Missouri and North Carolina
+ especially. In the St. Louis journals a Washington dispatch,
+ purporting (untruly however) to come from Senators Polk and Green,
+ was published to this effect.</p>
+
+<p> "The Crittenden Resolutions were lost by a vote of 25 to 23. A
+ motion of Mr. Cameron to reconsider was lost; and thus ends all
+ hope of reconciliation. Civil War is now considered inevitable,
+ and late accounts declare that Fort Sumter will be attacked without
+ delay. The Missouri delegation recommend immediate Secession."</p>
+
+<p> This is but a sample of other similar dispatches sent elsewhere.
+ And the following dispatch, signed by Mr. Crittenden, and published
+ in the Raleigh, N. C., Register, to quiet the excitement raised by
+ the telegrams of the Conspirators, serves also to indicate that the
+ friends of Compromise were not disheartened by their defeat:</p>
+
+<p> "WASHINGTON, Jan. 17th, 9 P. M.</p>
+
+<p> "In reply the vote against my resolutions will be reconsidered.
+ Their failure was the result of the refusal of six Southern
+ Senators to vote. There is yet good hope of success.</p>
+
+<p> "JOHN J. CRITTENDEN."</p>
+
+<p>
+ There is instruction also to be drawn from the speeches of Senators
+ Saulsbury, and Johnson of Tennessee, made fully a year afterward
+ (Jan. 29-31, 1862) in the Senate, touching the defeat of the
+ Crittenden Compromise by the Clark substitute at this time.
+ Speaking of the second session of the Thirty-sixth Congress, Mr.
+ Saulsbury said:</p>
+
+<p> "At that session, while vainly striving with others for the
+ adoption of those measures, I remarked in my place in the Senate
+ that&mdash;</p>
+
+<p> "'If any Gibbon should hereafter write the Decline and Fall of the
+ American Republic, he would date its fall from the rejection by the
+ Senate of the propositions submitted by the Senator from Kentucky.'</p>
+
+<p> "I believed so then, and I believe so now. I never shall forget,
+ Mr. President, how my heart bounded for joy when I thought I saw a
+ ray of hope for their adoption in the fact that a Republican
+ Senator now on this floor came to me and requested that I should
+ inquire of Mr. Toombs, who was on the eve of his departure for
+ Georgia to take a seat in the Convention of that State which was to
+ determine the momentous question whether she should continue a
+ member of the Union or withdraw from it, whether, if the Crittenden
+ propositions were adopted, Georgia would remain in the Union.</p>
+
+<p> "Said Mr. Toombs:</p>
+
+<p> "'Tell him frankly for me that if those resolutions are adopted by
+ the vote of any respectable number of Republican Senators,
+ evidencing their good faith to advocate their ratification by their
+ people, Georgia will not Secede. This is the position I assumed
+ before the people of Georgia. I told them that if the party in
+ power gave evidence of an intention to preserve our rights in the
+ Union, we were bound to wait until their people could act.'</p>
+
+<p> "I communicated the answer. The Substitute of the Senator from New
+ Hampshire [Mr. Clark] was subsequently adopted, and from that day
+ to this the darkness and the tempest and the storm have thickened,
+ until thousands like myself, as good and as true Union men as you,
+ Sir, though you may question our motives, have not only despaired
+ but are without hope in the future."</p>
+
+<p> To this speech, Mr. Johnson of Tennessee subsequently replied as
+ follows in the United States Senate (Jan. 31, 1862)</p>
+
+<p> "Sir, it has been said by the distinguished Senator from Delaware
+ [Mr. Saulsbury] that the questions of controversy might all have
+ been settled by Compromise. He dealt rather extensively in the
+ Party aspect of the case, and seemingly desired to throw the onus
+ of the present condition of affairs entirely on one side. He told
+ us that, if so and so had been done, these questions could have
+ been settled, and that now there would have been no War. He
+ referred particularly to the resolution offered during the last
+ Congress by the Senator from New Hampshire [Mr. Clark], and upon
+ the vote on that he based his argument. * * * The Senator told us
+ that the adoption of the Clark amendment to the Crittenden
+ Resolutions defeated the settlement of the questions of
+ controversy; and that, but for that vote, all could have been peace
+ and prosperity now. We were told that the Clark amendment defeated
+ the Crittenden Compromise, and prevented a settlement of the
+ controversy. On this point I will read a portion of the speech of
+ my worthy and talented friend from California [Mr. Latham]; and
+ when I speak of him thus, I do it in no unmeaning sense I intend
+ that he, not I, shall answer the Senator from Delaware. * * * As
+ I have said, the Senator from Delaware told us that the Clark
+ amendment was the turning point in the whole matter; that from it
+ had flowed Rebellion, Revolution, War, the shooting and
+ imprisonment of people in different States&mdash;perhaps he meant to
+ include my own. This was the Pandora's box that has been opened,
+ out of which all the evils that now afflict the Land have flown. *
+ * * My worthy friend from California [Mr. Latham], during the last
+ session of Congress, made one of the best speeches he ever made. *
+ * * In the course of that speech, upon this very point he made use
+ of these remarks:</p>
+
+<p> "'Mr. President, being last winter a careful eye-witness of all
+ that occurred, I soon became satisfied that it was a deliberate,
+ wilful design, on the part of some representatives of Southern
+ States, to seize upon the election of Mr. Lincoln merely as an
+ excuse to precipitate this revolution upon the Country. One
+ evidence, to my mind, is the fact that South Carolina never sent
+ her Senators here.'</p>
+
+<p> "Then they certainly were not influenced by the Clark amendment.</p>
+
+<p> "'An additional evidence is, that when gentlemen on this floor, by
+ their votes, could have controlled legislation, they refused to
+ cast them for fear that the very Propositions submitted to this
+ body might have an influence in changing the opinions of their
+ constituencies. Why, Sir, when the resolutions submitted by the
+ Senator from New Hampshire [Mr. Clark], were offered as an
+ amendment to the Crittenden Propositions, for the manifest purpose
+ of embarrassing the latter, and the vote taken on the 16th of
+ January, 1861, I ask, what did we see? There were fifty-five
+ Senators at that time upon this floor, in person. The Globe of the
+ second Session, Thirty-Sixth Congress, Part I., page 409, shows
+ that upon the call of the yeas and nays immediately preceding the
+ vote on the substituting of Mr. Clark's amendment, there were
+ fifty-five votes cast. I will read the vote from the Globe:</p>
+
+<p> "'YEAS&mdash;Messrs. Anthony, Baker, Bingham, Cameron, Chandler, Clark,
+ Collamer, Dixon, Doolittle, Durkee, Fessenden, Foot, Foster,
+ Grimes, Hale, Harlan, King, Seward, Simmons, Sumner, Ten Eyck,
+ Trumbull, Wade, Wilkinson, and Wilson&mdash;25.</p>
+
+<p> "NAYS&mdash;Messrs. Bayard, Benjamin, Bigler, Bragg, Bright, Clingman,
+ Crittenden, Douglas, Fitch, Green, Gwin, Hemphill, Hunter, Iverson,
+ Johnson of Arkansas, Johnson of Tennessee, Kennedy, Lane, Latham,
+ Mason, Nicholson, Pearce, Polk, Powell, Pugh, Rice, Saulsbury,
+ Sebastian, Slidell and Wigfall&mdash;30.</p>
+
+<p> "The vote being taken immediately after, on the Clark Proposition,
+ was as follows:</p>
+
+<p> "YEAS&mdash;Messrs. Anthony, Baker, Bingham, Cameron, Chandler, Clark,
+ Collamer, Dixon, Doolittle, Durkee, Fessenden, Foot, Foster,
+ Grimes, Hale, Harlan, King, Seward, Simmons, Sumner, Ten Eyck,
+ Trumbull, Wade, Wilkinson and Wilson&mdash;25.</p>
+
+<p> "NAYS&mdash;Messrs. Bayard, Bigler, Bragg, Bright, Clingman, Crittenden,
+ Fitch, Green, Gwin, Hunter, Johnson of Tennessee, Kennefly, Lane,
+ Latham, Mason, Nicholson, Pearce, Polk, Powell, Pugh, Rice,
+ Saulsbury and Sebastian&mdash;23.</p>
+
+<p> "'Six senators retained their seats and refused to vote, thus
+ themselves allowing the Clark Proposition to supplant the
+ Crittenden Resolution by a vote of twenty-five to twenty-three.
+ Mr. Benjamin of Louisiana, Mr. Hemphill and Mr. Wigfall of Texas,
+ Mr. Iverson of Georgia, Mr. Johnson of Arkansas, and Mr. Slidell of
+ Louisiana, were in their seats, but refused to cast their votes.'</p>
+
+<p> "I sat right behind Mr. Benjamin, and I am not sure that my worthy
+ friend was not close by, when he refused to vote, and I said to
+ him, 'Mr. Benjamin, why do you not vote? Why not save this
+ Proposition, and see if we cannot bring the Country to it?' He
+ gave me rather an abrupt answer, and said he would control his own
+ action without consulting me or anybody else. Said I: 'Vote, and
+ show yourself an honest man.' As soon as the vote was taken, he
+ and others telegraphed South, 'We cannot get any Compromise.' Here
+ were six Southern men refusing to vote, when the amendment would
+ have been rejected by four majority if they had voted. Who, then,
+ has brought these evils on the Country? Was it Mr. Clark? He was
+ acting out his own policy; but with the help we had from the other
+ side of the chamber, if all those on this side had been true to the
+ Constitution and faithful to their constituents, and had acted with
+ fidelity to the Country, the amendment of the Senator from New
+ Hampshire could have been voted down, the defeat of which the
+ Senator from Delaware says would have saved the Country. Whose
+ fault was it? Who is responsible for it? * * * Who did it?
+ SOUTHERN TRAITORS, as was said in the speech of the Senator from
+ California. They did it. They wanted no Compromise. They
+ accomplished their object by withholding their votes; and hence the
+ Country has been involved in the present difficulty. Let me read
+ another extract from this speech of the Senator from California</p>
+
+<p> "'I recollect full well the joy that pervaded the faces of some of
+ those gentlemen at the result, and the sorrow manifested by the
+ venerable Senator from Kentucky [Mr. Crittenden]. The record shows
+ that Mr. Pugh, from Ohio, despairing of any Compromise between the
+ extremes of ultra Republicanism and Disunionists, working
+ manifestly for the same end, moved, immediately after the vote was
+ announced, to lay the whole subject on the table. If you will turn
+ to page 443, same volume, you will find, when, at a late period,
+ Mr. Cameron, from Pennsylvania, moved to reconsider the vote,
+ appeals having been made to sustain those who were struggling to
+ preserve the Peace of the Country, that the vote was reconsidered;
+ and when, at last, the Crittenden Propositions were submitted on
+ the 2d day of March, these Southern States having 'nearly all
+ Seceded, they were then lost but by one vote. Here is the vote:</p>
+
+<p> "YEAS&mdash;Messrs. Bayard, Bigler, Bright, Crittenden, Douglas, Gwin,
+ Hunter, Johnson of Tennessee, Kennedy, Lane, Latham, Mason,
+ Nicholson, Polk, Pugh, Rice, Sebastian, Thomson and Wigfall&mdash;19.</p>
+
+<p> "'NAYS&mdash;Messrs. Anthony, Bingham, Chandler, Clark, Dixon,
+ Doolittle, Durkee, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Grimes, Harlan, King,
+ Morrill, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Trumbull, Wade, Wilkinson and
+ Wilson&mdash;20.</p>
+
+<p> "'If these Seceding Southern senators had remained, there would
+ have passed, by a large vote (as it did without them), an
+ amendment, by a two-third vote, forbidding Congress ever
+ interfering with Slavery in the States. The Crittenden Proposition
+ would have been indorsed by a majority vote, the subject finally
+ going before the People, who have never yet, after consideration,
+ refused Justice, for any length of time, to any portion of the
+ Country.</p>
+
+<p> "'I believe more, Mr. President, that these gentlemen were acting
+ in pursuance of a settled and fixed plan to break up and destroy
+ this Government.'</p>
+
+<p> "When we had it in our power to vote down the amendment of the
+ Senator from New Hampshire, and adopt the Crittenden Resolutions,
+ certain Southern Senators prevented it; and yet, even at a late day
+ of the session, after they had Seceded, the Crittenden Proposition
+ was only lost by one vote. If Rebellion and bloodshed and murder
+ have followed, to whose skirts does the responsibility attach?</p>
+
+<p> "What else was done at the very same session? The House of
+ Representatives passed, and sent to this body, a Proposition to
+ amend the Constitution of the United States, so as to prohibit
+ Congress from ever hereafter interfering with the Institution of
+ Slavery in the States, making that restriction a part of the
+ Organic law of the Land. That Constitutional Amendment came here
+ after the Senators from seven States had Seceded; and yet it was
+ passed by a two-third vote in the Senate. Have you ever heard of
+ any one of the States which had then Seceded, or which has since
+ Seceded, taking up that Amendment to the Constitution, and saying
+ they would ratify it, and make it a part of that instrument? No.
+ Does not the whole history of this Rebellion tell you that it was
+ Revolution that the Leaders wanted, that they started for, that
+ they intended to have? The facts to which I have referred show how
+ the Crittenden Proposition might have been carried; and when the
+ Senators from the Slave States were reduced to one-fourth of the
+ members of this body, the two Houses passed a Proposition to Amend
+ the Constitution, so as to guarantee to the States perfect security
+ in regard to the Institution of Slavery in all future time, and
+ prohibiting Congress from legislating on the subject.</p>
+
+<p> "But what more was done? After Southern Senators had treacherously
+ abandoned the Constitution and deserted their posts here, Congress
+ passed Bills for the Organization of three new Territories: Dakota,
+ Nevada, and Colorado; and in the sixth section of each of those
+ Bills, after conferring, affirmatively, power on the Territorial
+ Legislature, it went on to exclude certain powers by using a
+ negative form of expression; and it provided, among other things,
+ that the Legislature should have no power to legislate so as to
+ impair the right to private property; that it should lay no tax
+ discriminating against one description of Property in favor of
+ another; leaving the power on all these questions, not in the
+ Territorial Legislature, but in the People when they should come to
+ form a State Constitution.</p>
+
+<p> "Now, I ask, taking the Amendment to the Constitution, and taking
+ the three Territorial Bills, embracing every square inch of
+ territory in the possession of the United States, how much of the
+ Slavery question was left? What better Compromise could have been
+ made? Still we are told that matters might have been Compromised,
+ and that if we had agreed to Compromise, bloody Rebellion would not
+ now be abroad in the Land. Sir, Southern Senators are responsible
+ for it. They stood here with power to accomplish the result, and
+ yet treacherously, and, I may say, tauntingly they left this
+ chamber, and announced that they had dissolved their connection
+ with the Government. Then, when we were left in the hands of those
+ whom we had been taught to believe would encroach upon our Rights,
+ they gave us, in the Constitutional Amendment and in the three
+ Territorial Bills, all that had ever been asked; and yet gentlemen
+ talked Compromise!</p>
+
+<p> "Why was not this taken and accepted? No; it was not Compromise
+ that the Leaders wanted; they wanted Power; they wanted to Destroy
+ this Government, so that they might have place and emolument for
+ themselves. They had lost confidence in the intelligence and
+ virtue and integrity of the People, and their capacity to govern
+ themselves; and they intended to separate and form a government,
+ the chief corner-stone of which should be Slavery, disfranchising
+ the great mass of the People, of which we have seen constant
+ evidence, and merging the Powers of Government in the hands of the
+ Few. I know what I say. I know their feelings and their
+ sentiments. I served in the Senate here with them. I know they
+ were a Close Corporation, that had no more confidence in or respect
+ for the People than has the Dey of Algiers. I fought that Close
+ Corporation here. I knew that they were no friends of the People.
+ I knew that Slidell and Mason and Benjamin and Iverson and Toombs
+ were the enemies of Free Government, and I know so now. I
+ commenced the war upon them before a State Seceded; and I intend to
+ keep on fighting this great battle before the Country, for the
+ perpetuity of Free Government. They seek to overthrow it, and to
+ establish a Despotism in its place. That is the great battle which
+ is upon our hands. * * * Now, the Senator from Delaware tells us
+ that if that (Crittenden) Compromise had been made, all these
+ consequences would have been avoided. It is a mere pretense; it is
+ false. Their object was to overturn the Government. If they could
+ not get the Control of this Government, they were willing to divide
+ the Country and govern part of it."]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>
+The Clark substitute was then agreed to, by 25 (Republican) yeas to 23
+Democratic and Conservative (Bell-Everett) nays&mdash;6 Pro-Slavery Senators
+not voting, although present; and then, without division, the Crittenden
+Resolutions were tabled&mdash;Mr. Cameron, however, entering a motion to
+reconsider. Subsequently the action of the Senate, both on the
+Resolutions and Substitute, was reconsidered, and March 2d the matter
+came up again, as will hereafter appear.</p>
+
+<p>Two days prior to this action in the Senate, Mr. Corwin, Chairman of the
+Select Committee of Thirty-three, reported to the House (January 14th),
+from a majority of that Committee, the following Joint Resolution:</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
+States of America in Congress assembled, That all attempts on the parts
+of the Legislatures of any of the States to obstruct or hinder the
+recovery and surrender of Fugitives from Service or Labor, are in
+derogation of the Constitution of the United States, inconsistent with
+the comity and good neighborhood that should prevail among the several
+States, and dangerous to the Peace of the Union.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That the several States be respectfully requested to cause
+their Statutes to be revised, with a view to ascertain if any of them
+are in conflict with or tend to embarrass or hinder the execution of the
+Laws of the United States, made in pursuance of the second section of
+the Fourth Article of the Constitution of the United States for the
+delivery up of Persons held to Labor by the laws of any State and
+escaping therefrom; and the Senate and House of Representatives
+earnestly request that all enactments having such tendency be forthwith
+repealed, as required by a just sense of Constitutional obligations, and
+by a due regard for the Peace of the Republic; and the President of the
+United States is requested to communicate these resolutions to the
+Governors of the several States, with a request that they will lay the
+same before the Legislatures thereof respectively.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That we recognize Slavery as now existing in fifteen of the
+United States by the usages and laws of those States; and we recognize
+no authority, legally or otherwise, outside of a State where it so
+exists, to interfere with Slaves or Slavery in such States, in disregard
+of the Rights of their owners or the Peace of society.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That we recognize the justice and propriety of a faithful
+execution of the Constitution, and laws made in pursuance thereof, on
+the subject of Fugitive Slaves, or Fugitives from Service or Labor, and
+discountenance all mobs or hindrances to the execution of such laws, and
+that citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and
+immunities of citizens in the several States.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That we recognize no such conflicting elements in its
+composition, or sufficient cause from any source, for a dissolution of
+this Government; that we were not sent here to destroy, but to sustain
+and harmonize the Institutions of the Country, and to see that equal
+justice is done to all parts of the same; and finally, to perpetuate its
+existence on terms of equality and justice to all the States.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That a faithful observance, on the part of all the States, of
+all their Constitutional obligations to each other and to the Federal
+Government, is essential to the Peace of the Country.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That it is the duty of the Federal Government to enforce the
+Federal Laws, protect the Federal property, and preserve the Union of
+these States.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That each State be requested to revise its Statutes, and, if
+necessary, so to amend the same as to secure, without Legislation by
+Congress, to citizens of other States traveling therein, the same
+protection as citizens of such States enjoy; and also to protect the
+citizens of other States traveling or sojourning therein against popular
+violence or illegal summary punishment, without trial in due form of
+law, for imputed crimes.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That each State be also respectfully requested to enact such
+laws as will prevent and punish any attempt whatever in such State to
+recognize or set on foot the lawless invasion of any other State or
+Territory.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That the President be requested to transmit copies of the
+foregoing resolutions to the Governors of the several States, with a
+request that they be communicated to their respective Legislatures."</p>
+
+<p>
+This Joint Resolution, with amendments proposed to the same, came up in
+the House for action, on the 27th of February, 1861&mdash;the same day upon
+which the Peace Congress or Conference concluded its labors at
+Washington.</p>
+
+<p>The Proposition of Mr. Burch, of California, was the first acted upon.
+It was to amend the Select Committee's resolutions, as above given, by
+adding to them another resolution at the end thereof, as follows:</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, etc., That it be, and is hereby, recommended to the several
+States of the Union that they, through their respective Legislatures,
+request the Congress of the United States to call a Convention of all
+the States, in accordance with Article Fifth of the Constitution, for
+the purpose of amending said Constitution in such manner and with regard
+to such subjects as will more adequately respond to the wants, and
+afford more sufficient Guarantees to the diversified and growing
+Interests of the Government and of the People composing the same."</p>
+
+<p>This (Burch) amendment, however, was defeated by 14 yeas to 109 nays.</p>
+
+<p>A Proposition of Mr. Kellogg, of Illinois, came up next for action. It
+was a motion to strike out all after the first word "That" in the
+Crittenden Proposition&mdash;which had been offered by Mr. Clemens as a
+substitute for the Committee Resolutions&mdash;and insert the following:</p>
+
+<p>"The following articles be, and are hereby, proposed and submitted as
+Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be
+valid, to all intents and purposes as part of said Constitution, when
+ratified by Conventions of three-fourths of the several States.</p>
+
+<p>"Article XIII. That in all the territory now held by the United States
+situate north of latitude 36 30' Involuntary Servitude, except in the
+punishment for crime, is prohibited while such territory shall remain
+under a Territorial government; that in all the territory now held south
+of said line, neither Congress nor any Territorial Legislature shall
+hinder or prevent the emigration to said territory of Persons; held to
+Service from any State of this Union, when that relation exists by
+virtue of any law or usage of such State, while it shall remain in a
+Territorial condition; and when any Territory north or south of said
+line, within such boundaries as Congress may prescribe, shall contain
+the population requisite for a member of Congress, according to the then
+Federal ratio of representation of the People of the United States, it
+may, if its form of government be Republican, be admitted into the Union
+on an equal footing with the original States, with or without the
+relation of Persons held to Service and Labor, as the Constitution of
+such new State may provide.</p>
+
+<p>"Article XIV. That nothing in the Constitution of the United States, or
+any amendment thereto, shall be so construed as to authorize any
+Department of the Government to in any manner interfere with the
+relation of Persons held to Service in any State where that relation
+exists, nor in any manner to establish or sustain that relation in any
+State where it is prohibited by the Laws or Constitution of such State.
+And that this Article shall not be altered or amended without the
+consent of every State in the Union.</p>
+
+<p>"Article XV. The third paragraph of the second section of the Fourth
+Article of the Constitution shall be taken and construed to authorize
+and empower Congress to pass laws necessary to secure the return of
+Persons held to Service or Labor under the laws of any State, who may
+have escaped therefrom, to the party to whom such Service or Labor may
+be due.</p>
+
+<p>"Article XVI. The migration or importation of Persons held to Service
+or Involuntary Servitude, into any State, Territory, or place within the
+United States, from any place or country beyond the limits of the United
+States or Territories thereof, is forever prohibited.</p>
+
+<p>"Article XVII. No territory beyond the present limits of the United
+States and the Territories thereof, shall be annexed to or be acquired
+by the United States, unless by treaty, which treaty shall be ratified
+by a vote of two-thirds of the Senate."</p>
+
+<p>The Kellogg Proposition was defeated by 33 yeas to 158
+nays.</p>
+
+<p>The Clemens Substitute was next voted on. This embraced the whole of
+the Crittenden Compromise Proposition, as amended in the Senate by
+inserting the provision as to all territory "hereafter acquired," with
+the addition of another proposed Article of Amendment to the
+Constitution, as follows:</p>
+
+<p>"Article VII. Section I. The elective franchise and the Right to hold
+office, whether Federal, State, Territorial, or Municipal, shall not be
+exercised by Persons who are, in whole or in part, of the African Race.</p>
+
+<p>"Section II. The United States shall have power to acquire from time to
+time districts of country in Africa and South America, for the
+colonization, at expense of the Federal Treasury, of such Free Negroes
+and Mulattoes as the several States may wish to have removed from their
+limits, and from the District of Columbia, and such other places as may
+be under the jurisdiction of Congress."</p>
+
+<p>The Clemens Substitute (or Crittenden Measure, with the addition of said
+proposed Article VII.), was defeated by 80 yeas to 113 nays, and then
+the Joint Resolution of the Select Committee as heretofore given&mdash;after
+a vain attempt to table it&mdash;was passed by 136 yeas to 53 nays.</p>
+
+<p>Immediately after this action, a Joint Resolution to amend the
+Constitution of the United States, which had also been previously
+reported by the Select Committee of Thirty-three, came before the House,
+as follows:</p>
+
+<p>"Be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
+States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of both Houses
+concurring), That the following Article be proposed to the Legislatures
+of the several States as an Amendment to the Constitution of the United
+States, which, when ratified by three-fourths of said Legislatures,
+shall be valid, to all intents and purposes, as a part of the said
+Constitution, namely:</p>
+
+<p>"Article XII. No amendment of this Constitution having for its object
+any interference within the States with the relation between their
+citizens and those described in Section II. of the First Article of the
+Constitution as 'all other persons,' shall originate with any State that
+does not recognize that relation within its own limits, or shall be
+valid without the assent of every one of the States composing the
+Union."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Corwin submitted an Amendment striking out all the words after
+"namely;" and inserting the following:</p>
+
+<p>"Article XII. No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will
+authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within
+any State, with the Domestic Institutions thereof, including that of
+Persons held to Labor or Service by the laws of said State."</p>
+
+<p>Amid scenes of great disorder, the Corwin Amendment was adopted by 120
+yeas to 61 nays, and then the Joint Resolution as amended, was defeated
+(two-thirds not voting in the affirmative) by 123 yeas to 71 nays. On
+the following day (February 28th), amid still greater confusion and
+disorder, which the Speaker, despite frequent efforts, was unable to
+quell, that vote was reconsidered, and the Joint Resolution passed by
+133 yeas to 65 nays&mdash;a result which, when announced was received with
+"loud and prolonged applause, both on the floor, and in the galleries."</p>
+
+<p>On the 2d of March, the House Joint Resolution just given, proposing an
+Amendment to the Constitution, prohibiting Congress from touching
+Slavery within any State where it exists, came up in the Senate for
+action.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Pugh moved to substitute for it the Crittenden Proposition.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Doolittle moved to amend the proposed substitute (the Crittenden
+Proposition), by the insertion of the following, as an additional
+Article:</p>
+
+<p>"Under this Constitution, as originally adopted, and as it now exists,
+no State has power to withdraw from the jurisdiction of the United
+States; but this Constitution, and all laws passed in pursuance of its
+delegated powers, are the Supreme Law of the Land, anything contained in
+any Constitution, Ordinance, or Act of any State, to the contrary
+notwithstanding."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Doolittle's amendment was lost by 18 yeas to 28 nays.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Pugh's substitute (the Crittenden Proposition), was lost by 14 yeas
+to 25 nays.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Bingham moved to amend the House Joint Resolution, by striking out
+all after the word "resolved," and inserting the words of the Clark
+Proposition as heretofore given, but the amendment was rejected by 13
+yeas to 25 nays.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Grimes moved to strike out all after the word "whereas" in the
+preamble of the House Joint Resolution, and insert the following:</p>
+
+<p>"The Legislatures of the States of Kentucky, New Jersey, and Illinois
+have applied to Congress to call a Convention for proposing Amendments
+to the Constitution of the United States: Therefore,</p>
+
+<p>"Be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
+States of America in Congress assembled, That the Legislatures of the
+other States be invited to take the subject of such a Convention into
+consideration, and to express their will on that subject to Congress, in
+pursuance of the Fifth Article of the Constitution."</p>
+
+<p>This amendment was also rejected, by 14 yeas to 25 nays.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Johnson, of Arkansas, offered, as an amendment to the House Joint
+Resolution, the propositions submitted by the Peace Congress or
+Conference, but the amendment was disagreed to by 3 yeas to 34 nays.</p>
+
+<p>The House Joint Resolution was then adopted by 24 yeas to 12 nays.</p>
+
+<p>Subsequently the Crittenden Proposition came up again as a separate
+order, with the Clark substitute to it (once carried, but reconsidered),
+pending. The Clark substitute was then rejected by 14 yeas to 22 nays.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Crittenden then offered the Propositions of the Peace
+Congress, as a substitute for his own&mdash;and they were rejected by 7 yeas
+to 28 nays.</p>
+
+<p>The Crittenden Proposition itself was then rejected, by
+19 yeas to 20 nays.</p>
+
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+<a name="davis"></a>
+<center>
+<img alt="p138-davis.jpg (85K)" src="images/p138-davis.jpg" height="886" width="587">
+</center>
+<br><br><br>
+<a name="ch9"></a>
+<br><br>
+
+<center><h2>
+ CHAPTER IX.<br><br>
+
+ SLAVERY'S SETTING, AND FREEDOM'S DAWN.</h2></center><br>
+
+<p>On that long last night of the 36th Congress&mdash;and of the Democratic
+Administration&mdash;to the proceedings of which reference was made in the
+preceding Chapter, several notable speeches were made, but there was
+substantially nothing done, in the line of Compromise. The only thing
+that had been accomplished was the passage, as we have seen, by
+two-thirds majority in both Houses, of the Joint Resolution proposing a
+Constitutional Amendment prohibiting Congress from meddling with Slavery
+in Slave States. There was no Concession nor Compromise in this,
+because Republicans, as well as Democrats, had always held that Congress
+had no such power. It is true that the Pro-slavery men had charged the
+Republicans with ultimate designs, through Congress, upon Slavery in the
+Slave States; and Mr. Crittenden pleaded for its passage as exhibiting a
+spirit, on their part, of reconciliation; that was all.</p>
+
+<p>In his speech that night&mdash;that memorable and anxious night preceding the
+Inauguration of President Lincoln&mdash;the venerable Mr. Crittenden,
+speaking before the Resolution was agreed to, well sketched the
+situation when he said in the Senate: "It is an admitted fact that our
+Union, to some extent, has already been dismembered; and that further
+dismemberment is impending and threatened. It is a fact that the
+Country is in danger. This is admitted on all hands. It is our duty,
+if we can, to provide a remedy for this. We are, under the Constitution
+and by the election of the People, the great guardians, as well as the
+administrators of this Government. To our wisdom they have trusted this
+great chart. Remedies have been proposed; resolutions have been
+offered, proposing for adoption measures which it was thought would
+satisfy the Country, and preserve as much of the Union as remained to us
+at least, if they were not enough at once to recall the Seceding States
+to the Union. We have passed none of these measures. The differences
+of opinion among Senators have been such that we have not been able to
+concur in any of the measures which have been proposed, even by bare
+majorities, much less by that two-thirds majority which is necessary to
+carry into effect some of the pacific measures which have been proposed.
+We are about to adjourn. We have done nothing. Even the Senate of the
+United States, beholding this great ruin around them, beholding
+Dismemberment and Revolution going on, and Civil War threatened as the
+result, have been able to do nothing; we have absolutely done nothing.
+Sir, is not this a remarkable spectacle? * * * How does it happen that
+not even a bare majority here, when the Country trusted to our hands is
+going to ruin, have been competent to devise any measure of public
+safety? How does it happen that we have not had unanimity enough to
+agree on any measure of that kind? Can we account for it to ourselves,
+gentlemen? We see the danger; we acknowledge our duty, and yet, with
+all this before us, we are acknowledging before the world that we can do
+nothing; acknowledging before the world, or appearing to all the world,
+as men who do nothing! Sir, this will make a strange record in the
+history of Governments and in the history of the world. Some are for
+Coercion; yet no army has been raised, no navy has been equipped. Some
+are for pacification; yet they have been able to do nothing; the dissent
+of their colleagues prevents them; and here we are in the midst of a
+falling Country, in the midst of a falling State, presenting to the eyes
+of the World the saddest spectacle it has ever seen. Cato is
+represented by Addison as a worthy spectacle, 'a great man falling with
+a falling State,' but he fell struggling. We fall with the ignominy on
+our heads of doing nothing, like the man who stands by and sees his
+house in flames, and says to himself, 'perhaps the fire will stop before
+it consumes all.'"</p>
+
+<p>One of the strong pleas made in the Senate that night, was by Mr.
+Douglas, when he said: "The great issue with the South has been that
+they would not submit to the Wilmot proviso. The Republican Party
+affirmed the doctrine that Congress must and could prohibit Slavery in
+the Territories. The issue for ten years was between Non-intervention
+on the part of Congress, and prohibition by Congress. Up to two years
+ago, neither the Senator (Mason) from Virginia, nor any other Southern
+Senator, desired affirmative legislation to protect Slavery. Even up to
+this day, not one of them has proposed affirmative legislation to
+protect it. Whenever the question has come up, they have decided that
+affirmative legislation to protect it was unnecessary; and hence, all
+that the South required on the Territorial question was 'hands off;
+Slavery shall not be prohibited by Act of Congress.' Now, what do we
+find? This very session, in view of the perils which surround the
+Country, the Republican Party, in both Houses of Congress, by a
+unanimous vote, have backed down from their platform and abandoned the
+doctrine of Congressional prohibition. This very week three Territorial
+Bills have been passed through both Houses of Congress without the
+Wilmot proviso, and no man proposed to enact it; not even one man on the
+other side of the Chamber would rise and propose the Wilmot proviso."</p>
+
+<p>"In organizing three Territories," continued he, "two of them South of
+the very line where they imposed the Wilmot proviso twelve years ago, no
+one on the other side of the Chamber proposed it. They have abandoned
+the doctrine of the President-elect upon that point. He said, and it is
+on record, that he had voted for the Wilmot proviso forty-two times, and
+would do it forty-two times more if he ever had a chance. Not one of
+his followers this year voted for it once. The Senator from New York
+(Mr. Seward) the embodiment of the Party, sat quietly and did not
+propose it. What more? Last year we were told that the Slave Code of
+New Mexico was to be repealed. I denounced the attempted interference.
+The House of Representatives passed the Bill, but the Bill remains on
+your table; no one Republican member has proposed to take it up and pass
+it. Practically, therefore, the Chicago platform is abandoned; the
+Philadelphia platform is abandoned; the whole doctrine for which the
+Republican Party contended, as to the Territories, is abandoned,
+surrendered, given up. Non-intervention is substituted in its place.
+Then, when we find that, on the Territorial question, the Republican
+Party, by a unanimous vote, have surrendered to the South all they ask,
+the Territorial question ought to be considered pretty well settled.
+The only question left was that of the States; and after having
+abandoned their aggressive policy as to the Territories, a portion of
+them are willing to unite with us, and deprive themselves of the power
+to do it in the States."</p>
+
+<p>"I submit," said he, "that these two great facts&mdash;these startling,
+tremendous facts&mdash;that they have abandoned their aggressive policy in
+the Territories, and are willing to give guarantees in the States, ought
+to be accepted as an evidence of a salutary change in Public Opinion at
+the North. All I would ask now of the Republican Party is, that they
+would insert in the Constitution the same principle that they have
+carried out practically in the Territorial Bills for Colorado, Dakota,
+and Nevada, by depriving Congress of the power hereafter to do what
+there cannot be a man of them found willing to do this year; but we
+cannot ask them to back down too much. I think they have done quite as
+much within one year, within three months after they have elected a
+President, as could be expected."</p>
+
+<p>That Douglas and his followers were also patriotically willing to
+sacrifice a favorite theory in the face of a National peril, was brought
+out, at the same time, by Mr. Baker, when he said to Mr. Douglas: "I
+desire to suggest (and being a little of a Popular Sovereignty man, it
+comes gracefully from me) that others of us have backed down too, from
+the idea that Congress has not the power to prohibit Slavery in the
+Territories; and we are proposing some of us in the Crittenden
+proposition, and some in the Amendment now before the Senate&mdash;to
+prohibit Slavery by the Constitution itself, in the Territories;"&mdash;and
+by Mr. Douglas, when he replied: "I think as circumstances change, the
+action of public men ought to change in a corresponding degree. * * * I
+am willing to depart from my cherished theory, by an Amendment to the
+Constitution by which we shall settle this question on the principles
+prescribed in the Resolutions of the Senator from Kentucky."</p>
+
+<p> In the House, Mr. Logan, had, on the 5th of February, 1861, said:</p>
+
+<p> "Men, Sir, North and South, who love themselves far better than
+ their Country, have brought us to this unhappy condition. * * *
+ Let me say to gentlemen, that I will go as far as any man in the
+ performance of a Constitutional duty to put down Rebellion, to
+ suppress Insurrection, and to enforce the laws; but when we
+ undertake the performance of these duties, let us act in such a
+ manner as will be best calculated to preserve and not destroy the
+ Government, and keep ourselves within the bounds of the
+ Constitution. * * * Sir, I have always denied, and do yet deny,
+ the Right of Secession. There is no warrant for it in the
+ Constitution. It is wrong, it is unlawful, unconstitutional, and
+ should be called by the right name, Revolution. No good, Sir, can
+ result from it, but much mischief may. It is no remedy for any
+ grievance.</p>
+
+<p> "I hold that all grievances can be much easier redressed inside the
+ Union than out of it. * * * If a collision must ensue between
+ this Government and any of our own people, let it come when every
+ other means of settlement has been tried and exhausted; and not
+ then, except when the Government shall be compelled to repel
+ assaults for the protection of its property, flag, and the honor of
+ the Country. * * *</p>
+
+<p> "I have been taught to believe that the preservation of this
+ glorious Union, with its broad flag waving over us, as the shield
+ for our protection on land and on sea, is paramount to all the
+ Parties and platforms that ever have existed, or ever can exist. I
+ would, to-day, if I had the power, sink my own Party, and every
+ other one, with all their platforms, into the vortex of ruin,
+ without heaving a sigh or shedding a tear, to save the Union, or
+ even stop the Revolution where it is."</p>
+
+<p> After enumerating the various propositions for adjustment, then
+ pending in the House, to wit: that of Senator Crittenden; that of
+ Senator Douglas; that of the Committee of Thirty-three; that of the
+ Border States; and those of Representatives McClernand, Kellogg,
+ and Morris, of Illinois, Mr. Logan took occasion to declare that
+ "in a crisis like this" he was "willing to give his support to any
+ of them," but his preference was for that of Mr. Morris.</p>
+
+<p> Said he: "He (Morris) proposes that neither Congress nor a
+ Territorial Legislature shall interfere with Slavery in the
+ Territories at all; but leaves the people, when they come to form
+ their State Constitution, to determine the question for themselves.
+ I think this is the best proposition, because it is a fair
+ concession on all sides. The Republicans give up their
+ Congressional intervention; those who are styled 'Squatter
+ Sovereigns' give up their Territorial legislative policy; and the
+ Southern (Slave) protectionists give up their
+ protection-intervention policy; thus every Party yields something. With this
+ proposition as an Article in the Constitution, it would satisfy
+ every conservative man in this Union, both North and South, I do
+ seriously and honestly believe.</p>
+
+<p> "Having indicated my preference of these propositions, and my
+ reasons for that preference, I have said all I desire to say on the
+ point, except to repeat again, that I will willingly vote for any
+ of them, or make any other sacrifice necessary to save the Union.
+ It makes no kind of difference to me what the sacrifice; if it will
+ save my Country, I am ready to make it." * * *</p>
+
+<p> "There are some in this Hall," said he, "that are almost ready to
+ strike the Party fetters from their limbs, and assist in measures
+ of Peace. Halt not; take the step; be independent and free at
+ once! Let us overcome Party passion and error; allow virtue and
+ good sense in this fateful hour to be triumphant; let us invoke
+ Deity to interpose and prepare the way for our Country's escape
+ from the perils by which we are now surrounded; and in view of our
+ present greatness and future prospects, our magnificent and growing
+ cities, our many institutions of learning, our once happy and
+ prosperous People, our fruitful fields and golden forests, our
+ enjoyment of all civil and religious blessings&mdash;let Parties die
+ that these be preserved. Such noble acts of patriotism and
+ concession, on your part, would cause posterity to render them
+ illustrious, and pause to contemplate the magnitude of the events
+ with which they were connected. * * * In the name of the patriotic
+ sires who breasted the storms and vicissitudes of the Revolution;
+ by all the kindred ties of this Country; in the name of the many
+ battles fought for your Freedom; in behalf of the young and the
+ old; in behalf of the Arts and Sciences, Civilization, Peace,
+ Order, Christianity, and Humanity, I appeal to you to strike from
+ your limbs the chains that bind them! Come forth from that
+ loathsome prison, Party Caucus; and in this hour&mdash;the most gloomy
+ and disheartening to the lovers of Free Institutions that has ever
+ existed during our Country's history&mdash;arouse the drooping spirits
+ of our countrymen, by putting forth your good strong arms to assist
+ in steadying the rocking pillars of the mightiest Republic that has
+ ever had an existence."</p>
+
+<p> "Mr. Speaker," continued he, "a word or two more, and I am done.
+ Revolution stalks over the Land. States have rebelled against the
+ constituted authorities of the Union, and now stand, sword in hand,
+ prepared to vindicate their new nationality. Others are preparing
+ to take a similar position. Rapidly transpiring events are
+ crowding on us with fearful velocity. Soon, circumstances may
+ force us into an unnatural strife, in which the hand of brother
+ shall be uplifted against brother, and father against son. My God,
+ what a spectacle! If all the evils and calamities that have ever
+ happened since the World began, could be gathered in one great
+ Catastrophe, its horrors could not eclipse, in their frightful
+ proportions, the Drama that impends over us. Whether this black
+ cloud that drapes in mourning the whole political heavens, shall
+ break forth in all the frightful intensity of War, and make
+ Christendom weep at the terrible atrocities that will be
+ enacted&mdash;or, whether it will disappear, and the sky resume its wonted
+ serenity, and the whole Earth be irradiated by the genial sunshine
+ of Peace once more&mdash;are the alternatives which this Congress, in my
+ judgment, has the power to select between."</p>
+
+<p>In this same broad spirit, Mr. Seward, in his great speech of January
+12th, had said: "Republicanism is subordinate to Union, as everything
+else is and ought to be&mdash;Republicanism, Democracy, every other political
+name and thing; all are subordinate&mdash;and they ought to disappear in the
+presence of the great question of Union." In another part of it, he had
+even more emphatically said: "I therefore * * * avow my adherence to the
+Union in its integrity and with all its parts, with my friends, with my
+Party, with my State, with my Country, or without either, as they may
+determine, in every event, whether of Peace or War, with every
+consequence of honor or dishonor, of life or death. Although I lament
+the occasion, I hail with cheerfulness the duty of lifting up my voice
+among distracted debates, for my whole Country and its inestimable
+Union." And as showing still more clearly the kindly and conciliatory
+attitude of the great Republican leader, when speaking of those others
+who seemed to be about to invoke revolutionary action to oppose&mdash;and
+overthrow the Government&mdash;he said: "In such a case I can afford to meet
+prejudice with Conciliation, exaction with Concession which surrenders
+no principle, and violence with the right hand of Peace."</p>
+
+<p>In the House of Representatives, too, the voice of patriotism was often
+heard through the loud clamor and disorder of that most disorderly and
+Treason-uttering session&mdash;was heard from the lips of statesmen, who rose
+high above Party, in their devotion to the Union. The calm,
+dispassionate recital by Henry Winter Davis (of Maryland), of the
+successive steps by which the Southern leaders had themselves created
+that very "North" of whose antagonism they complained, was one of the
+best of these, in some respects. He was one of the great Select
+Committee of Thirty-three, and it was (February 5th) after the
+Resolutions, heretofore quoted, had been reported by it, that he
+condensed the history of the situation into a nutshell, as follows:</p>
+
+<p>"We are at the end of the insane revel of partisan license which, for
+thirty years, has, in the United States, worn the mask of Government.
+We are about to close the masquerade by the dance of death. The Nations
+of the World look anxiously to see if the People, ere they tread that
+measure, will come to themselves.</p>
+
+<p> * * * * * * * * * * * * *</p>
+
+<p>"Southern politicians have created a North. Let us trace the process
+and draw the moral.</p>
+
+<p>"The laws of 1850 calmed and closed the Slavery agitation; and President
+Pierce, elected by the almost unanimous voice of the States, did not
+mention Slavery in his first two Messages. In 1854, the repeal of the
+Missouri Compromise, at the instance of the South, reopened the
+agitation.</p>
+
+<p>"Northern men, deserted by Southern Whigs, were left to unite for
+self-defense.</p>
+
+<p>"The invasion of Kansas, in 1855 and 1856, from Missouri; the making a
+Legislature and laws for that Territory, by the invaders; still further
+united the Northern people. The election of 1856 measured its extent.</p>
+
+<p>"The election of Mr. Buchanan and his opening policy in Kansas, soothed
+the irritation, and was rapidly demoralizing the new Party, when the
+Pro-Slavery Party in Kansas perpetrated, and the President and the South
+accepted, the Lecompton fraud, and again united the North more
+resolutely in resistance to that invasion of the rights of
+self-government.</p>
+
+<p>"The South for the first time failed to dictate terms; and the People
+vindicated by their votes the refusal of the Constitution.</p>
+
+<p>"Ere this result was attained, the opinions of certain Judges of the
+Supreme Court scattered doubts over the law of Slavery in the
+Territories; the South, while repudiating other decisions, instantly
+made these opinions the criterion of faithfulness to the Constitution;
+while the North was agitated by this new sanction of the extremest
+pretensions of their opponents.</p>
+
+<p>"The South did not rest satisfied with their Judicial triumph.</p>
+
+<p>"Immediately the claim was pressed for protection by Congress to
+Slavery, declared by the Supreme Court, they said, to exist in all the
+Territories.</p>
+
+<p>"This completed the union of the Free States in one great defensive
+league; and the result was registered in November. That result is now
+itself become the starting point of new agitation&mdash;the demand of new
+rights and new guarantees. The claim to access to the Territories was
+followed by the claim to Congressional protection, and that is now
+followed by the hitherto unheard of claim to a Constitutional Amendment
+establishing Slavery, not merely in territory now held, but in all
+hereafter held from the line of 36 30' to Cape Horn, while the debate
+foreshadows in the distance the claim of the right of transit and the
+placing of property in Slaves in all respects on the footing of other
+property&mdash;the topics of future agitation. How long the prohibition of
+the importation of Slaves will be exempted from the doctrine of
+equality, it needs no prophet to tell.</p>
+
+<p>"In the face of this recital, let the imputation of autocratic and
+tyrannical aspirations cease to be cast on the people of the Free
+States; let the Southern people dismiss their fears, return to their
+friendly confidence in their fellow-citizens of the North, and accept,
+as pledges of returning Peace, the salutary amendments of the law and
+the Constitution offered as the first fruits of Reconciliation."</p>
+
+<p>But calmness, kindness, and courtesy were alike thrown away in both
+Houses upon the implacable Southern leaders. As the last day of that
+memorable session, which closed in the failure of all peaceful measures
+to restore the Union, slowly dawned&mdash;with but a few hours lacking of the
+time when Mr. Lincoln would be inaugurated President of the United
+States&mdash;Mr. Wigfall thought proper, in the United States Senate, to
+sneer at him as "an ex-rail-splitter, an ex-grocery keeper, an
+ex-flatboat captain, and an ex-Abolition lecturer"&mdash;and proceeded to scold
+and rant at the North with furious volubility.</p>
+
+<p>"Then, briefly," said he, "a Party has come into power that represents
+the antagonism to my own Section of the Country. It represents two
+million men who hate us, and who, by their votes for such a man as they
+have elected, have committed an overt act of hostility. That they have
+done."</p>
+
+<p>"You have won the Presidency," said he, to the Republicans, "and you are
+now in the situation of the man who had won the elephant at a raffle.
+You do not know what to do with the beast now that you have it; and
+one-half of you to-day would give your right arms if you had been defeated.
+But you succeeded, and you have to deal with facts. Our objection to
+living in this Union, and therefore the difficulty of reconstructing it,
+is not your Personal Liberty bills, not the Territorial question, but
+that you utterly and wholly misapprehend the Form of Government."</p>
+
+<p>"You deny," continued he, "the Sovereignty of the States; you deny the
+right of self-government in the People; you insist upon Negro Equality;
+your people interfere impertinently with our Institutions and attempt to
+subvert them; you publish newspapers; you deliver lectures; you print
+pamphlets, and you send them among us, first, to excite our Slaves to
+insurrection against their masters, and next, to array one class of
+citizens against the other; and I say to you, that we cannot live in
+peace, either in the Union or out of it, until you have abolished your
+Abolition societies; not, as I have been misquoted, abolish or destroy
+your school-houses; but until you have ceased in your schoolhouses
+teaching your children to hate us; until you have ceased to convert your
+pulpits into hustings; until you content yourselves with preaching
+Christ, and Him crucified, and not delivering political harangues on the
+Sabbath; until you have ceased inciting your own citizens to make raids
+and commit robberies; until you have done these things we cannot live in
+the same Union with you. Until you do these things, we cannot live out
+of the Union at Peace."</p>
+
+<p>Such were the words&mdash;the spiteful, bitter words&mdash;with which this chosen
+spokesman of the South saluted the cold and cloudy dawn of that day
+which was to see the sceptre depart from the hands of the Slave Power
+forever.</p>
+
+<p>A few hours later, under the shadow of the main Pastern Portico of the
+Capitol at Washington&mdash;with the retiring President and Cabinet, the
+Supreme Court Justices, the Foreign Diplomatic Corps, and hundreds of
+Senators, Representatives and other distinguished persons filling the
+great platform on either side and behind them&mdash;Abraham Lincoln stood
+bareheaded before full thirty thousand people, upon whose uplifted faces
+the unveiled glory of the mild Spring sun now shone&mdash;stood reverently
+before that far greater and mightier Presence termed by himself, "My
+rightful masters, the American People"&mdash;and pleaded in a manly, earnest,
+and affectionate strain with "such as were dissatisfied," to listen to
+the "better angels" of their nature.</p>
+
+<p>Temperate, reasonable, kindly, persuasive&mdash;it seems strange that Mr.
+Lincoln's Inaugural Address did not disarm at least the personal
+resentment of the South toward him, and sufficiently strengthen the
+Union-loving people there, against the red-hot Secessionists, to put the
+"brakes" down on Rebellion. Said he:</p>
+
+<p>"Apprehension seems to exist among the people of the Southern States,
+that by the accession of a Republican Administration, their Property and
+their Peace and personal security are to be endangered. There has never
+been any reasonable cause for such apprehension. Indeed, the most ample
+evidence to the contrary has all the while existed, and been open to
+their inspection. It is found in nearly all the published speeches of
+him who now addresses you. I do but quote from one of those speeches,
+when I declare that 'I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to
+interfere with the Institution of Slavery in the States where it
+exists.' I believe I have no lawful right to do so; and I have no
+inclination to do so. Those who nominated and elected me, did so with
+the full knowledge that I had made this, and many similar declarations,
+and had never recanted them. * * *</p>
+
+<p>"I now reiterate these sentiments; and in doing so, I only press upon
+the public attention the most conclusive evidence of which the case is
+susceptible, that the Property, Peace, and Security of no Section are to
+be in any wise endangered by the now incoming Administration. I add,
+too, that all the protection which, consistently with the Constitution
+and the laws, can be given, will be cheerfully given to all the States,
+when lawfully demanded, for whatever cause&mdash;as cheerfully to one Section
+as to another.</p>
+
+<p>"I take the official oath to-day with no mental reservations, and with
+no purpose to construe the Constitution or laws by any hypercritical
+rules. * * *</p>
+
+<p>"A disruption of the Federal Union, heretofore only menaced, is now
+formidably attempted. I hold that, in contemplation of Universal Law,
+and of the Constitution, the Union of these States is perpetual.
+Perpetuity is implied, if not expressed, in the fundamental law of all
+National Governments. It is safe to assert that no Government proper
+ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination.
+Continue to execute all the express provisions of our National
+Constitution, and the Union will endure forever&mdash;it being impossible to
+destroy it, except by some action not provided for in the instrument
+itself.</p>
+
+<p>"Again, if the United States be not a Government proper, but an
+Association of States in the nature of a contract merely, can it, as a
+contract, be peaceably unmade by less than all the parties who made it?
+One party to a contract may violate it&mdash;break it, so to speak; but does
+it not require all, to lawfully rescind it?</p>
+
+<p>"Descending from these general principles, we find the proposition that,
+in legal contemplation, the Union is perpetual, confirmed by the history
+of the Union itself. The Union is much older than the Constitution. It
+was formed, in fact, by the Articles of Association in 1774. It was
+matured and continued in the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It
+was further matured, and the faith of all the then thirteen States
+expressly plighted and engaged that it should be perpetual, by the
+Articles of Confederation, in 1778; and, finally, in 1787, one of the
+declared objects, for ordaining and establishing the Constitution, was
+'to form a more perfect Union.' But, if destruction of the Union by
+one, or by a part only, of the States, be lawfully possible, the Union
+is less perfect than before, the Constitution having lost the vital
+element of perpetuity.</p>
+
+<p>"It follows, from these views, that no State, upon its own mere motion,
+can lawfully get out of the Union; that Resolves and Ordinances to that
+effect, are legally void; and that acts of violence within any State or
+States against the authority of the United States, are insurrectionary
+or revolutionary, according to circumstances.</p>
+
+<p>"I therefore consider that, in view of the Constitution and the laws,
+the Union is unbroken, and, to the extent of my ability, I shall take
+care, as the Constitution itself expressly enjoins upon me, that the
+laws of the Union shall be faithfully executed in all the States. * * *</p>
+
+<p>"I trust this will not be regarded as a menace, but only as the declared
+purpose of the Union, that it will Constitutionally defend and maintain
+itself.</p>
+
+<p>"In doing this, there need be no bloodshed or violence, and there shall
+be none, unless it is forced upon the National Authority.</p>
+
+<p>"The power confided to me will be used to hold, occupy, and possess the
+property and places belonging to the Government, and to collect the
+duties and imposts; but, beyond what may be necessary for these objects,
+there will be no invasion, no using of force against or among the People
+anywhere.</p>
+
+<p>"The mails, unless repelled, will continue to be furnished in all parts
+of the Union.</p>
+
+<p> * * * * * * *</p>
+
+<p>"Is there such perfect identity of interests among the States to compose
+a new Union, as to produce harmony only, and prevent renewed Secession?
+Plainly, the central idea of Secession is the essence of anarchy. A
+majority, held in restraint by Constitutional checks and limitations and
+always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and
+sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a Free People. Whoever
+rejects it, does, of necessity, fly to anarchy, or to despotism.
+Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent
+arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority
+principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left.</p>
+
+<p> * * * * * * *</p>
+
+<p>"Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our
+respective Sections from each other, nor build an impassable wall
+between them. A husband and wife may be divorced, and go out of the
+presence and beyond the reach of each other; but the different parts of
+our Country cannot do this. They cannot but remain face to face; and
+intercourse, either amicable or hostile, must continue between them. Is
+it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more
+satisfactory after separation than before? Can aliens make treaties,
+easier than friends can make laws? Can treaties be more faithfully
+enforced between aliens, than laws can among friends? Suppose you go to
+War, you cannot fight always; and when, after much loss on both sides,
+and no gain on either you cease fighting, the identical old questions,
+as to terms of intercourse, are again upon you.</p>
+
+<p>"This Country, with its Institutions, belongs to the People who inhabit
+it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can
+exercise their Constitutional right of amending it, or their
+Revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it. I cannot be ignorant
+of the fact that many worthy and patriotic citizens are desirous of
+having the National Constitution amended. While I make no
+recommendations of Amendments, I fully recognize the rightful authority
+of the People over the whole subject, to be exercised in either of the
+modes prescribed in the instrument itself; and I should, under existing
+circumstances, favor, rather than oppose, a fair opportunity being
+afforded the People to act upon it. * * *</p>
+
+<p>"The Chief Magistrate derives all his authority from the People, and
+they have conferred none upon him to fix terms for the separation of the
+States. The People themselves can do this also, if they choose; but the
+Executive, as such, has nothing to do with it. His duty is to
+administer the present Government, as it came to his hands, and to
+transmit it, unimpaired by him, to his successor.</p>
+
+<p> * * * * * * *</p>
+
+<p>" * * * While the People retain their virtue and vigilance, no
+Administration, by any extreme of weakness or folly, can very seriously
+injure the Government in the short space of four years.</p>
+
+<p>"My countrymen, one and all, think calmly and well upon this whole
+subject. Nothing valuable can be lost by taking time. If there be an
+object to hurry any of you, in hot haste, to a step which you would
+never take deliberately, that object will be frustrated by taking time;
+but no good object can be frustrated by it. Such of you as are now
+dissatisfied, still have the old Constitution unimpaired, and, on the
+sensitive point, the laws of your own framing under it; while the new
+Administration will have no immediate power, if it would, to change
+either. If it were admitted that you who are dissatisfied, hold the
+right side in the dispute, there still is no single good reason for
+precipitate action. Intelligence, patriotism, Christianity, and a firm
+reliance on Him who has never yet forsaken this favored Land, are still
+competent to adjust, in the best way, all our present difficulty.</p>
+
+<p>"In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is
+the momentous issue of Civil War. The Government will not assault you.
+You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. You
+have no oath registered in Heaven to destroy the Government, while I
+shall have the most solemn one to 'preserve, protect, and defend it'.</p>
+
+<p>"I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be
+enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds
+of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every
+battle-field and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone,
+all over this broad Land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when
+again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our
+nature."</p>
+
+<p>Strange, indeed, must have been the thoughts that crowded through the
+brain and oppressed the heart of Abraham Lincoln that night&mdash;his first
+at the White House!</p>
+
+<p>The city of Washington swarmed with Rebels and Rebel sympathizers, and
+all the departments of Government were honey-combed with Treason and
+shadowed with treachery and espionage. Every step proposed or
+contemplated by the Government would be known to the so-called
+Government of the Confederate States almost as soon as thought of. All
+means, to thwart and delay the carrying out of the Government's
+purposes, that the excuses of routine and red-tape admitted of, would be
+used by the Traitors within the camp, to aid the Traitors without.</p>
+
+<p>No one knew all this, better than Mr. Lincoln. With no Army, no Navy,
+not even a Revenue cutter left&mdash;with forts and arsenals, ammunition and
+arms in possession of the Rebels, with no money in the National
+Treasury, and the National credit blasted&mdash;the position must, even to
+his hopeful nature, have seemed at this time desperate. To be sure,
+despite threats, neither few nor secret, which had been made, that he
+should not live to be inaugurated, he had passed the first critical
+point&mdash;had taken the inaugural oath&mdash;and was now duly installed in the
+White House. That was something, of course, to be profoundly thankful
+for. But the matter regarded by him of larger moment&mdash;the safety of the
+Union&mdash;how about that?</p>
+
+<p>How that great, and just, and kindly brain, in the dim shadows of that
+awful first night at the White House, must have searched up and down and
+along the labyrinths of history and "corridors of time," everywhere in
+the Past, for any analogy or excuse for the madness of this Secession
+movement&mdash;and searched in vain!</p>
+
+<p>With his grand and abounding faith in God, how Abraham Lincoln must have
+stormed the very gates of Heaven that night with prayer that he might be
+the means of securing Peace and Union to his beloved but distracted
+Country! How his great heart must have been racked with the
+alternations of hope and foreboding&mdash;of trustfulness and doubt!
+Anxiously he must have looked for the light of the morrow, that he might
+gather from the Press, the manner in which his Inaugural had been
+received. Not that he feared the North&mdash;but the South; how would the
+wayward, wilful, passionate South, receive his proffered olivef-branch?</p>
+
+<p>Surely, surely,&mdash;thus ran his thoughts&mdash;when the brave, and gallant, and
+generous people of that Section came to read his message of Peace and
+Good-will, they must see the suicidal folly of their course! Surely
+their hearts must be touched and the mists of prejudice dissolved, so
+that reason would resume her sway, and Reconciliation follow! A little
+more time for reflection would yet make all things right. The young men
+of the South, fired by the Southern leaders' false appeals, must soon
+return to reason. The prairie fire is terrible while it sweeps along,
+but it soon burns out. When the young men face the emblem of their
+Nation's glory&mdash;the flag of the land of their birth&mdash;then will come the
+reaction and their false leaders will be hurled from place and power,
+and all will again be right. Yea, when it comes to firing on the old,
+old flag, they will not, cannot, do it! Between the Compromise within
+their reach, and such Sacrilege as this, they cannot waver long.</p>
+
+<p>So, doubtless, all the long night, whether waking or sleeping, the mind
+of this true-hearted son of the West, throbbed with the mighty weight of
+the problem entrusted to him for solution, and the vast responsibilities
+which he had just assumed toward his fellow-men, his Nation, and his
+God.</p>
+
+<p>And when, at last, the long lean frame was thrown upon the couch, and
+"tired Nature's sweet restorer" held him briefly in her arms, the smile
+of hopefulness on the wan cheek told that, despite all the terrible
+difficulties of the situation, the sleeper was sustained by a strong and
+cheerful belief in the Providence of God, the Patriotism of the People,
+and the efficacy of his Inaugural Peace-offering to the South. But alas,
+and alas, for the fallibility of human judgment and human hopes!
+Instead of a message of Peace, the South chose to regard it as a message
+of Menace;* and it was not received in a much better spirit by some of
+the Northern papers, which could see no good in it&mdash;"no Union spirit in
+it"&mdash;but declared that it breathed the spirit of Sectionalism and
+mischief, and "is the knell and requiem of the Union, and the death of
+hope."</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> ["Mr. Lincoln fondly regarded his Inaugural as a resistless
+ proffering of the olive branch to the South; the Conspirators
+ everywhere interpreted it as a challenge to War."&mdash;Greeley's Am.
+ Conflict, vol. i., p. 428.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>
+Bitter indeed must have been President Lincoln's disappointment and
+sorrow at the reception of his Inaugural. With the heartiest
+forgiveness, in the noblest spirit of paternal kindness, he had
+generously held out his arms, as far as they could reach, to clasp to
+his heart&mdash;to the great heart of the Union&mdash;the rash children of the
+South, if they would but let him. It was more with sorrow, than in
+anger, that he looked upon their contemptuous repulsion of his advances;
+and his soul still reproachfully yearned toward these his Southern
+brethren, as did that of a higher than he toward His misguided brethren,
+when He cried: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets,
+and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have
+gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens
+under her wings, and ye would not!"</p>
+
+<p>On the day following his Inauguration, President Lincoln sent to the
+United States Senate the names of those whom he had chosen to constitute
+his Cabinet, as follows: William H. Seward, of New York, Secretary of
+State; Salmon P. Chase, of Ohio, Secretary of the Treasury; Simon
+Cameron, of Pennsylvania, Secretary of War; Gideon Welles, of
+Connecticut, Secretary of the Navy; Caleb B. Smith, of Indiana,
+Secretary of the Interior; Edward Bates, of Missouri, Attorney General;
+and Montgomery Blair, of Maryland, Postmaster General.</p>
+
+<p>On the other hand, the President of the rebellious Confederacy,
+Jefferson Davis, had partly constituted his Cabinet already, as follows:
+Robert Toombs, of Georgia, Secretary of State; Charles G. Memminger, of
+South Carolina, Secretary of the Treasury; Leroy Pope Walker, of
+Alabama, Secretary of War; to whom he afterwards added: Stephen R.
+Mallory, of Florida, Secretary of the Navy; and John H. Reagan, of
+Texas, Postmaster-General.</p>
+
+<br><br><br><br>
+<a name="ch10"></a>
+<br><br>
+
+<center><h2>
+ CHAPTER X.<br><br>
+
+ THE WAR-DRUM "ON TO WASHINGTON".</h2></center><br>
+
+<p>Scarcely one week had elapsed after the Administration of Mr. Lincoln
+began, when (March 11th) certain "Commissioners of the Southern
+Confederacy" (John Forsyth, of Alabama, and Martin J. Crawford, of
+Georgia), appeared at Washington and served a written request upon
+the State Department to appoint an early day when they might present to
+the President of the United States their credentials "from the
+Government of the Confederate States of America" to the Government of
+the United States, and open "the objects of the mission with which they
+are charged."</p>
+
+<p>Secretary Seward, with the President's sanction, declined official
+intercourse with Messrs. Forsyth and Crawford, in a "Memorandum" (March
+15th) reciting their request, etc., in which, after referring to
+President Lincoln's Inaugural Address&mdash;forwarded to them with the
+"Memorandum" he says: "A simple reference will be sufficient to satisfy
+those gentlemen that the Secretary of State, guided by the principles
+therein announced, is prevented altogether from admitting or assuming
+that the States referred to by them have, in law or in fact, withdrawn
+from the Federal Union, or that they could do so in the manner described
+by Messrs. Forsyth and Crawford, or in any other manner than with the
+consent and concert of the People of the United States, to be given
+through a National Convention, to be assembled in conformity with the
+provisions of the Constitution of the United States. Of course, the
+Secretary of State cannot act upon the assumption, or in any way admit,
+that the so-called Confederate States constitute a Foreign Power, with
+whom diplomatic relations ought to be established."</p>
+
+<p>On the 9th of April, Messrs. Forsyth, Crawford and Roman&mdash;as
+"Commissioners of the Southern Confederacy"&mdash;addressed to Secretary
+Seward a reply to the "Memorandum" aforesaid, in which the following
+passage occurs:</p>
+
+<p>"The undersigned, like the Secretary of State, have no purpose to
+'invite or engage in discussion' of the subject on which their two
+Governments are so irreconcilably at variance. It is this variance that
+has broken up the old Union, the disintegration of which has only begun.</p>
+
+<p>"It is proper, however, to advise you that it were well to dismiss the
+hopes you seem to entertain that, by any of the modes indicated, the
+people of the Confederate States will ever be brought to submit to the
+authority of the Government of the United States. You are dealing with
+delusions, too, when you seek to separate our people from our
+Government, and to characterize the deliberate, Sovereign act of that
+people as a 'perversion of a temporary and partisan excitement.' If you
+cherish these dreams, you will be awakened from them, and find them as
+unreal and unsubstantial as others in which you have recently indulged.</p>
+
+<p>"The undersigned would omit the performance of an obvious duty were they
+to fail to make known to the Government of the United States that the
+people of the Confederate States have declared their independence with a
+full knowledge of all the responsibilities of that act, and with as firm
+a determination to maintain it by all the means with which nature has
+endowed them as that which sustained their fathers when they threw off
+the authority of the British Crown.</p>
+
+<p>"The undersigned clearly understand that you have declined to appoint a
+day to enable them to lay the objects of the mission with which they are
+charged, before the President of the United States, because so to do
+would be to recognize the independence and separate nationality of the
+Confederate States. This is the vein of thought that pervades the
+memorandum before us.</p>
+
+<p>"The truth of history requires that it should distinctly appear upon the
+record, that the undersigned did not ask the Government of the United
+States to recognize the independence of the Confederate States. They
+only asked audience to adjust, in a spirit of amity and peace, the new
+relations springing from a manifest and accomplished revolution in the
+Government of the late Federal Union.</p>
+
+<p>"Your refusal to entertain these overtures for a peaceful solution, the
+active naval and military preparation of this Government, and a formal
+notice to the Commanding General of the Confederate forces in the harbor
+of Charleston that the President intends to provision Fort Sumter by
+forcible means, if necessary, are viewed by the undersigned, and can
+only be received by the World, as a Declaration of War against the
+Confederate States; for the President of the United States knows that
+Fort Sumter cannot be provisioned without the effusion of blood.</p>
+
+<p>"The undersigned, in behalf of their Government and people, accept the
+gage of battle thus thrown down to them, and, appealing to God and the
+judgment of mankind for the righteousness of their Cause, the people of
+the Confederate States will defend their liberties to the last, against
+this flagrant and open attempt at their subjugation to Sectional power."</p>
+
+<p>
+Let us now, for a moment, glance at the condition of Fort Sumter, and of
+the Government with regard to it:</p>
+
+<p>On the 5th of March, the day after President Lincoln had taken his oath
+of office, there was placed in his hands a letter of Major Anderson,
+commanding at Fort Sumter, in which that officer, under date of the 28th
+of February, expressed the opinion that "reinforcements could not be
+thrown into that fort within the time for his relief rendered necessary
+by the limited supply of provisions, and with a view of holding
+possession of the same, with a force of less than twenty thousand good
+and well-disciplined men."</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [President Lincoln's first Message, July 4, 1861.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Lieutenant-General Winfield Scott concurred in that opinion, and as the
+provisions in the Fort would be exhausted before any such force could be
+raised and brought to the ground, evacuation and safe withdrawal of the
+Federal garrison from the Fort became a Military necessity, and was so
+regarded by the Administration.</p>
+
+<p>"It was believed, however"&mdash;in the language of Mr. Lincoln himself, in
+his first Message to Congress&mdash;"that to so abandon that position, under
+the circumstances, would be utterly ruinous: that the necessity under
+which it was to be done would not be fully understood; that by many it
+would be construed as a part of a voluntary policy; that at home it
+would discourage the friends of the Union, embolden its adversaries, and
+go far to insure to the latter a recognition abroad; that in fact it
+would be our National destruction consummated. This could not be
+allowed. Starvation was not yet upon the garrison; and ere it would be
+reached, Fort Pickens might be reinforced. This last would be a clear
+indication of policy, and would better enable the country to accept the
+evacuation of Fort Sumter as a Military necessity."</p>
+
+<p>Owing to misconception or otherwise, an order to reinforce Fort Pickens
+was not carried out, and an expedition to relieve Fort Sumter was then
+ordered to be dispatched. On the 8th of April President Lincoln, by
+messenger, notified Governor Pickens of South Carolina, "that he might
+expect an attempt would be made to provision the fort; and that if the
+attempt should not be resisted there would be no effort to throw in men,
+arms, or ammunition, without further notice, or in case of an attack
+upon the fort."</p>
+
+<p>A crisis was evidently approaching, and public feeling all over the
+Country was wrought up to the highest degree of tension and stood
+tip-toe with intense expectancy. The test of the doctrine of Secession was
+about to be made there, in the harbor of Charleston, upon which the eyes
+of Patriot and Rebel were alike feverishly bent.</p>
+
+<p>There, in Charleston harbor, grimly erect, stood the octagon-shaped Fort
+Sumter, mid-way of the harbor entrance, the Stars and Stripes proudly
+waving from its lofty central flagstaff, its guns bristling on every
+side through the casemates and embrasures, as if with a knowledge of
+their defensive power.</p>
+
+<p>About equidistant from Fort Sumter on either side of the
+harbor-entrance, were the Rebel works at Fort Moultrie and Battery Bee on
+Sullivan's Island, on the one side, and Cummings Point Battery, on
+Morris Island, on the other-besides a number of other batteries facing
+seaward along the sea-coast line of Morris Island. Further in, on the
+same side of the harbor, and but little further off from Fort Sumter,
+stood Fort Johnson on James Island, while Castle Pinckney and a Floating
+Battery were between the beleagured Fort and the city of Charleston.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, the Federal Fort was threatened with the concentrated fire of
+these well-manned Rebel fortifications on all sides, and in its then
+condition was plainly doomed; for, while the swarming Rebels, unmolested
+by Fort Sumter, had been permitted to surround that Fort with frowning
+batteries, whose guns outnumbered those of the Fort, as ten to one, and
+whose caliber was also superior, its own condition was anything but that
+of readiness for the inevitable coming encounter.</p>
+
+<p>That the officers' quarters, barracks, and other frame-work wooden
+buildings should have been permitted to remain as a standing invitation
+to conflagration from bombardment, can only be accounted for on the
+supposition that the gallant officer in command, himself a Southerner,
+would not believe it possible that the thousands of armed Americans by
+whom he was threatened and encircled, could fire upon the flag of their
+own native Country. He and his garrison of seventy men, were soon to
+learn the bitter truth, amid a tempest of bursting shot and shell, the
+furnace-heat of crackling walls, and suffocating volumes of dense smoke
+produced by an uncontrollable conflagration.</p>
+
+<p>The Rebel leaders at Washington had prevented an attack in January upon
+the forts in the harbor of Charleston, and at Pensacola.&mdash;[McPherson's
+History of the Rebellion, p. 112.]&mdash;In consequence of which failure to
+proceed to the last extremity at once, the energies of the Rebellion had
+perceptibly diminished.</p>
+
+<p>Said the Mobile Mercury: "The country is sinking into a fatal apathy,
+and the spirit and even the patriotism of the people is oozing out,
+under this do-nothing policy. If something is not done pretty soon,
+decisive, either evacuation or expulsion, the whole country will become
+so disgusted with the sham of Southern independence that the first
+chance the people get at a popular election they will turn the whole
+movement topsy-turvy so bad that it never on Earth can be righted
+again."</p>
+
+<p>After the inauguration of Mr. Lincoln, however, the Rebel authorities at
+Montgomery lost no time, but strained every nerve to precipitate War.
+They felt that there was danger to the cause of Secession in delay; that
+there were wavering States outside the Confederacy, like Virginia, that
+might be dragged into the Confederacy by prompt and bloody work; and
+wavering States within, like Alabama, that must be kept in by similar
+means. Their emissaries were busy everywhere in the South, early in
+April, preaching an instant crusade against the old flag&mdash;inciting the
+people to demand instant hostilities against Fort Sumter&mdash;and to cross a
+Rubicon of blood, over which there could be no return.</p>
+
+<p>Many of the Rebel leaders seemed to be haunted by the fear (no doubt
+well founded) that unless blood was shed&mdash;unless an impassable barrier,
+crimsoned with human gore, was raised between the new Confederacy and
+the old Union&mdash;there would surely be an ever-present danger of that
+Confederacy falling to pieces. Hence they were now active in working
+the people up to the required point of frenzy.</p>
+
+<p>As a specimen of their speeches, may be quoted that of Roger A. Pryor,
+of Virginia, who, at Charleston, April 10, 1861, replying to a serenade,
+said:&mdash;[Charleston Mercury's report.]</p>
+
+<p>'Gentlemen, I thank you, especially that you have at last annihilated
+this accursed Union [Applause] reeking with corruption, and insolent
+with excess of tyranny. Thank God, it is at last blasted and riven by
+the lightning wrath of an outraged and indignant people. [Loud
+applause.] Not only is it gone, but gone forever. [Cries of, 'You're
+right,' and applause.] In the expressive language of Scripture, it is
+water spilt upon the ground, which cannot be gathered up. [Applause.]
+Like Lucifer, son of the morning, it has fallen, never to rise again.
+[Continued applause.]</p>
+
+<p>"For my part, gentlemen," he continued, as soon as he could be heard,
+"if Abraham Lincoln and Hannibal Hamlin to-morrow were to abdicate their
+offices and were to give me a blank sheet of paper to write the
+condition of re-annexation to the defunct Union, I would scornfully
+spurn the overture. * * * I invoke you, and I make it in some sort a
+personal appeal&mdash;personal so far as it tends to our assistance in
+Virginia&mdash;I do invoke you, in your demonstrations of popular opinion, in
+your exhibitions of official intent, to give no countenance to this idea
+of reconstruction. [Many voices, emphatically, 'never,' and applause.]</p>
+
+<p>"In Virginia," resumed he, "they all say, if reduced to the dread
+dilemma of this memorable alternative, they will espouse the cause of
+the South as against the interest of the Northern Confederacy, but they
+whisper of reconstruction, and they say Virginia must abide in the
+Union, with the idea of reconstructing the Union which you have
+annihilated. I pray you, gentlemen, rob them of that idea. Proclaim to
+the World that upon no condition, and under no circumstances, will South
+Carolina ever again enter into political association with the
+Abolitionists of New England. [Cries of 'never,' and applause.]</p>
+
+<p>"Do not distrust Virginia," he continued; "as sure as tomorrow's sun
+will rise upon us, just so sure will Virginia be a member of this
+Southern Confederation. [Applause.] And I will tell you, gentlemen,
+what will put her in the Southern Confederacy in less than an hour by
+Shrewsbury clock&mdash;STRIKE A BLOW! [Tremendous applause.] The very
+moment that blood is shed, old Virginia will make common cause with her
+sisters of the South. [Applause.] It is impossible she should do
+otherwise."</p>
+
+<p>The question of the necessity of "Striking a Blow"&mdash;of the immediate
+"shedding of blood"&mdash;was not only discussed before the Southern people
+for the purpose of inflaming their rebellious zeal, but was also the
+subject of excited agitation in the Confederate Cabinet at this time.</p>
+
+<p>In a speech made by ex-United States Senator Clemens of Alabama, at
+Huntsville, Alabama, at the close of the Rebellion, he told the
+Alabamians how their State, which, as we have seen, was becoming
+decidedly shaky in its allegiance to the "Sham of Southern
+Independence," was kept in the Confederacy.</p>
+
+<p>Said he: "In 1861, shortly after the Confederate Government was put in
+operation, I was in the city of Montgomery. One day (April 11, 1861) I
+stepped into the office of the Secretary of War, General Walker, and
+found there, engaged in a very excited discussion, Mr. Jefferson Davis
+(the President), Mr. Memminger (Secretary of the Treasury), Mr. Benjamin
+(Attorney-General), Mr. Gilchrist, a member of our Legislature from
+Loundes county, and a number of other prominent gentlemen. They were
+discussing the propriety of immediately opening fire on Fort Sumter, to
+which General Walker, the Secretary of War, appeared to be opposed. Mr.
+Gilchrist said to him, 'Sir, unless you sprinkle blood in the face of
+the people of Alabama, they will be back in the old Union in less than
+ten days!' THE NEXT DAY GENERAL BEAUREGARD OPENED HIS BATTERIES ON
+SUMTER, AND ALABAMA WAS SAVED TO THE CONFEDERACY."</p>
+
+<p>On the 8th of April, G. T. Beauregard, "Brigadier General Commanding"
+the "Provisional Army C. S. A." at Charleston, S. C., notified the
+Confederate Secretary of War (Walker) at Montgomery, Ala., that "An
+authorized messenger from President Lincoln has just informed Gov.
+Pickens and myself that provisions will be sent to Fort Sumter
+peaceably, or otherwise by force."</p>
+
+<p>On the 10th, Confederate Secretary Walker telegraphed to Beauregard: "If
+you have no doubt of the authorized character of the agent who
+communicated to, you the intention of the Washington Government to
+supply Fort Sumter by force, you will at once demand its evacuation,
+and, if this is refused, proceed, in such manner as you may determine,
+to reduce it." To this Beauregard at once replied: "The demand will be
+made to-morrow at 12 o'clock." Thereupon the Confederate Secretary
+telegraphed again: "Unless there are special reasons connected with your
+own condition, it is considered proper that you should make the demand
+at an earlier hour." And Beauregard answered: "The reasons are special
+for 12 o'clock."</p>
+
+<p>On the 11th General Beauregard notified Secretary Walker: "The demand
+was sent at 2 P. M., and until 6 was allowed for the answer." The
+Secretary desiring to have the reply of Major Anderson, General
+Beauregard telegraphed: "Major Anderson replies: 'I have the honor to
+acknowledge the receipt of your communication demanding the evacuation
+of this Fort, and to say in reply thereto that it is a demand with which
+I regret that my sense of honor and of my obligation to my Government
+prevent my compliance.' He adds, verbally, 'I will await the first
+shot, and, if you do not batter us to pieces, we will be starved out in
+a few days.'"</p>
+
+<p>To this, the Confederate Secretary at once responded with: "Do not
+desire needlessly to bombard Fort Sumter. If Major Anderson will state
+the time at which, as indicated by himself, he will evacuate, and agree
+that, in the mean time, he will not use his guns against us unless ours
+should be employed against Fort Sumter, you are authorized thus to avoid
+the effusion of blood. If this or its equivalent be refused, reduce the
+Fort, as your judgment decides to be the most practicable."</p>
+
+<p>At 11 o'clock that night (April 11) General Beauregard sent to Major
+Anderson, by the hands of his aides-de-camp, Messrs. Chesnut and Lee, a
+further communication, in which, after alluding to the Major's verbal
+observation, the General said: "If you will state the time at which you
+will evacuate Fort Sumter, and agree that in the mean time you will not
+use your guns against us unless ours shall be employed against Fort
+Sumter, we shall abstain from opening fire upon you. Col. Chesnut and
+Capt. Lee are authorized by me to enter into such an agreement with you.
+You are therefore requested to communicate to them an open answer."</p>
+
+<p>To this, Major Robert Anderson, at 2.30 A.M. of the 12th, replied "that,
+cordially uniting with you in the desire to avoid the useless effusion
+of blood, I will, if provided with the necessary means of
+transportation, evacuate Fort Sumter by noon on the 15th inst., should I
+not receive prior to that time, controlling instructions from my
+Government, or additional supplies, and that I will not in the mean time
+open my fire upon your forces unless compelled to do so by some hostile
+act against this Fort or the flag of my Government, by the forces under
+your command, or by some portion of them, or by the perpetration of some
+act showing a hostile intention on your part against this Fort or the
+flag it bears." Thereupon General Beauregard telegraphed Secretary
+Walker: "He would not consent. I write to-day."</p>
+
+<p>At 3.20 A.M., Major Anderson received from Messrs. Chesnut and Lee a
+notification to this effect: "By authority of Brigadier General
+Beauregard, commanding the Provisional Forces of the Confederate States,
+we have the honor to notify you that he will open the fire of his
+batteries on Fort Sumter in one hour from this time." And a later
+dispatch from General Beauregard to Secretary Walker, April 12,
+laconically stated: "WE OPENED FIRE AT 4.30."</p>
+
+<p>At last the hour and the minute had come, for which the Slave Power of
+the South had for thirty years so impatiently longed. At last the
+moment had come, when all the long-treasured vengeance of the
+South&mdash;outgrown from questions of Tariff, of Slavery, and of Secession&mdash;was to
+be poured out in blood and battle; when the panoplied powers and forces
+of rebellious confederated States, standing face to face with the
+resolute patriotism of an outraged Union, would belch forth flame and
+fury and hurtling missiles upon the Federal Fort and the old flag
+floating o'er it.</p>
+
+<p>And whose the sacrilegious hand that dared be first raised against his
+Country and his Country's flag? Stevens's mortar battery at Sullivan's
+Island is ready to open, when a lean, long-haired old man, with eyes
+blazing in their deep fanatical sockets, totters hastily forward and
+ravenously seizing in his bony hands a lanyard, pulls the string, and,
+with a flash and roar, away speeds the shrieking shell on its mission of
+destruction; and, while shell after shell, and shot after shot, from
+battery after battery, screams a savage accompaniment to the boom and
+flash and bellow of the guns, that lean old man works his clutched
+fingers in an ecstasy of fiendish pleasure, and chuckles: "Aye, I told
+them at Columbia that night, that the defense of the South is only to be
+secured through the lead of South Carolina; and, old as I am, I had come
+here to join them in that lead&mdash;and I have done it."</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [Edmund Ruffin, see p. 100. This theory of the necessity of South
+ Carolina leading, had long been held, as in the following, first
+ published in the New York Tribune, July 3, 1862, which, among other
+ letters, was found in the house of William H. Trescot, on
+ Barnwell's Island, South Carolina, when re-occupied by United
+ States troops:</p>
+
+<p> "VIRGINIA CONVENTION, May 3, 1851</p>
+
+<p> "My DEAR, SIR:&mdash;You misunderstood my last letter, if you supposed
+ that I intended to visit South Carolina this Spring. I am
+ exceedingly obliged to you for your kind invitations, and it would
+ afford me the highest pleasure to interchange in person, sentiments
+ with a friend whose manner of thinking so closely agrees with my
+ own. But my engagements here closely confine me to this city, and
+ deny me such a gratification.</p>
+
+<p> "I would be especially glad to be in Charleston next week, and
+ witness the proceedings of your Convention of Delegates from the
+ Southern Rights Associations. The condition of things in your
+ State deeply interests me. Her wise foresight and manly
+ independence have placed her, as the head of the South, to whom
+ alone true-hearted men can look with any hope or pleasure.</p>
+
+<p> "Momentous are the consequences which depend upon your action.
+ Which party will prevail? The immediate Secessionists, or those
+ who are opposed to separate State action at this time? For my part
+ I forbear to form a wish. Were I a Carolinian, it would be very
+ different; but when I consider the serious effects the decision may
+ have on your future weal or woe, I feel that a citizen of a State
+ which has acted as Virginia, has no right to interfere, even by a
+ wish.</p>
+
+<p> "If the General Government allows you peaceably and freely to
+ Secede, neither Virginia, nor any other Southern State, would, in
+ my opinion, follow you at present. But what would be the effect
+ upon South Carolina? Some of our best friends have supposed that
+ it would cut off Charleston from the great Western trade, which she
+ is now striking for, and would retard very greatly the progress of
+ your State. I confess that I think differently. I believe
+ thoroughly in our own theories, and that, even if Charleston did
+ not grow quite as fast in her trade with other States, yet the
+ relief from Federal taxation would vastly stimulate your
+ prosperity. If so, the prestige of the Union would be destroyed,
+ and you would be the nucleus for a Southern Confederation at no
+ distant day.</p>
+
+<p> "But I do not doubt, from all I have been able toe to learn that the
+ Federal Government would use force, beginning with the form most
+ embarrassing to you, and least calculated to excite sympathy. I
+ mean a naval blockade. In that event, could you stand the reaction
+ feeling which the suffering commerce of Charleston would probably
+ manifest? Would you not lose that in which your strength consists,
+ the union of your people? I do not mean to imply an opinion, I
+ only ask the question.</p>
+
+<p> "If you could force this blockade, and bring the Government to
+ direct force, the feeling in Virginia would be very great. I trust
+ in God it would bring her to your aid. But it would be wrong in me
+ to deceive you by speaking certainly. I cannot express the deep
+ mortification I have felt at her course this Winter. But I do not
+ believe that the course of the Legislature is a fair expression of
+ popular feeling. In the East, at least, the great majority
+ believes in the right of Secession, and feels the deepest sympathy
+ with Carolina in her opposition to measures which they regard as
+ she does. But the West&mdash;Western Virginia&mdash;there is the rub! Only
+ 60,000 slaves to 494,000 whites! When I consider this fact, and
+ the kind of argument which has been heard in this body, I cannot
+ but regard with the greatest fear the question whether Virginia
+ would assist Carolina in such an issue.</p>
+
+<p> "I must acknowledge, my dear sir, that I look to the future with
+ almost as much apprehension as hope. You well object to the term
+ Democrat. Democracy, in its original philosophical sense, is
+ indeed incompatible with Slavery and the whole system of Southern
+ society. Yet, if you look back, what change will you find made in
+ any of your State Constitutions, or in our legislation&mdash;that is, in
+ its general course&mdash;for the last fifty years, which was not in the
+ direction of this Democracy? Do not its principles and theories
+ become daily more fixed in our practice? (I had almost said in the
+ opinions of our people, did I not remember with pleasure the great
+ improvement of opinion in regard to the abstract question of
+ Slavery). And if such is the case, what are we to hope in the
+ future? I do not hesitate to say that if the question is raised
+ between Carolina and the Federal Government, and the latter
+ prevails, the last hope of republican government, and, I fear, of
+ Southern civilization, is gone. Russia will then be a better
+ government than ours.</p>
+
+<p> "I fear that the confusion and interruptions amid which I write
+ have made this rather a rambling letter. Do you visit the North in
+ the Summer? I would be very happy to welcome you to the Old
+ Dominion.</p>
+
+<p> "I am much obliged to you for the offer to send me Hammond's Eulogy
+ on Calhoun, but I am indebted to the author for a copy.</p>
+
+<p> "With esteem and friendship, yours truly,</p>
+
+<p> "M. R. H. GARNETT.</p>
+
+<p> "WM. H. TRESCOT, ESQ."]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>
+Next morning's New York herald, in its Charleston dispatch of April 12,
+announced to the World that "The first shot [fired at Fort Sumter] from
+Stevens's battery was fired by the venerable Edmund Ruffin, of
+Virginia," and added, "That ball will do more for the cause of
+Secession, in Virginia, than volumes of stump speeches."</p>
+
+<p>"Soon," says Greeley in his History, "the thunder of fifty heavy
+breaching cannon, in one grand volley, followed by the crashing and
+crumbling of brick, stone, and mortar around and above them, apprized
+the little garrison that their stay must necessarily be short."</p>
+
+<p>Says an eye-witness of the bombardment: "Shells burst with the greatest
+rapidity in every portion of the work, hurling the loose brick and stone
+in all directions, breaking the windows and setting fire to whatever
+woodwork they burst against. * * * The firing from the batteries on
+Cumming's Point was scattered over the whole of the gorge or rear of the
+Fort, till it looked like a sieve. The explosion of shells, and the
+quantity of deadly missiles that were hurled in every direction and at
+every instant of time, made it almost certain death to go out of the
+lower tier of casemates, and also made the working of the barbette or
+upper (uncovered) guns, which contained all our heaviest metal, and by
+which alone we could throw shells, quite impossible.</p>
+
+<p>"During the first day there was hardly an instant of time that there was
+a cessation of the whizzing of balls, which were sometimes coming half a
+dozen at once. There was not a portion of the work which was not taken
+in reverse from mortars. * * * During Friday, the officers' barracks
+were three times set on fire by the shells and three times put out under
+the most galling and destructive cannonade.</p>
+
+<p>"For the fourth time, the barracks were set on fire early on Saturday
+morning, and attempts were made to extinguish the flames; but it was
+soon discovered that red-hot shot were being thrown into the Fort with
+fearful rapidity, and it became evident that it would be impossible to
+put out the conflagration. The whole garrison was then set to work, or
+as many as could be spared, to remove the powder from the magazines,
+which was desperate work, rolling barrels of powder through the fire. *
+* * After the barracks were well on fire, the batteries directed upon
+Fort Sumter increased their cannonading to a rapidity greater than had
+been attained before."</p>
+
+<p>"About this time, the shells and ammunition in the upper
+service-magazines exploded, scattering the tower and upper portions of the
+building in every direction. The crash of the beams, the roar of the
+flames, and the shower of fragments of the Fort, with the blackness of
+the smoke, made the scene indescribably terrific and grand. This
+continued for several hours. * * * "</p>
+
+<p>"There was not a portion of the Fort where a breath of air could be got
+for hours, except through a wet cloth. The fire spread to the men's
+quarters on the right hand and on the left, and endangered the powder
+which had been taken out of the magazines. The men went through the
+fire, and covered the barrels with wet cloths, but the danger of the
+Fort's blowing up became so imminent that they were obliged to heave the
+barrels out of the embrasures."</p>
+
+<p>Major Anderson's official report tells the whole story briefly and well,
+in these words:</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> "STEAMSHIP BALTIC, OFF SANDY HOOK</p>
+
+<p> "April 18, 1861, 10.30 A.M., VIA NEW YORK.</p>
+
+<p>"Having defended Fort Sumter for thirty-four hours, until the quarters
+were entirely burnt, the main gates destroyed by fire, the gorge walls
+seriously injured, the magazine surrounded by flames, and its door
+closed from the effects of heat; four barrels and three cartridges of
+powder only being available, and no provisions remaining but pork, I
+accepted terms of evacuation offered by General Beauregard&mdash;being the
+same offered by him on the 11th inst., prior to the commencement of
+hostilities&mdash;and marched out of the Fort on Sunday afternoon, the 14th
+instant, with colors flying and drums beating, bringing away company and
+private property, and saluting my flag with fifty guns.</p>
+
+<p> "ROBERT ANDERSON,
+ "Major 1st Artillery, Commanding.</p>
+
+<p>"HON. SIMON CAMERON,
+"Secretary of War, Washington."</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>
+During all this thirty-four hours of bombardment, the South rejoiced
+with exceeding great joy that the time had come for the vindication of
+its peculiar ideas of State and other rights, even though it be with
+flames and the sword. At Charleston, the people were crazy with
+exultation and wine-feasting and drinking being the order of the day and
+night. But for the surrender, Fort Sumter would have been stormed that
+Sunday night. As it was, Sunday was turned into a day of general
+jubilation, and while the people cheered and filled the streets, all the
+Churches of Charleston celebrated, with more or less devotional fervor
+and ceremony, the bloodless victory.</p>
+
+<p>At Montgomery, the Chiefs of the Confederate Government were serenaded.
+"Salvos of artillery were fired, and the whole population seemed to be
+in an ecstasy of triumph."&mdash;[McPherson's History of the Rebellion, p.
+114]</p>
+
+<p>The Confederate Secretary of War, flushed with the success, predicted
+that the Confederate flag "will, before the first of May, float over the
+dome of the old Capitol at Washington" and "will eventually float over
+Faneuil Hall, in Boston."</p>
+
+<p>From Maryland to Mexico, the protests of Union men of the South were
+unheard in the fierce clamor of "On to Washington!"</p>
+
+<p>The Richmond Examiner said: "There never was half the unanimity among
+the people before, nor a tithe of the zeal upon any subject, that is now
+manifested to take Washington. From the mountain tops and valleys to
+the shores of the sea, there is one wild shout of fierce resolve to
+capture Washington City at all and every human hazard."</p>
+
+<p>So also, the Mobile Advertiser enthusiastically exclaimed:</p>
+
+<p>"We are prepared to fight, and the enemy is not. Now is the time for
+action, while he is yet unprepared. Let the fife sound 'Gray Jackets
+over the Border,' and let a hundred thousand men, with such arms as they
+can snatch, get over the border as quickly as they can. Let a division
+enter every Northern border State, destroy railroad connection to
+prevent concentration of the enemy, and the desperate strait of these
+States, the body of Lincoln's country, will compel him to a peace&mdash;or
+compel his successor, should Virginia not suffer him to escape from his
+doomed capital."</p>
+
+<p>It was on Friday morning, the 12th of April, as we have seen, that the
+first Rebel shot was fired at Fort Sumter. It was on Saturday afternoon
+and evening that the terms of surrender were agreed to, and on Sunday
+afternoon that the Federal flag was saluted and hauled down, and the
+surrender completed. On Monday morning, being the 15th of April, in all
+the great Northern Journals of the day appeared the following:</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p>"PROCLAMATION.</p>
+
+<p>"WHEREAS, the laws of the United States have been for some time past,
+and now are, opposed, and the execution thereof obstructed, in the
+States of South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi,
+Louisiana, and Texas, by Combinations too powerful to be suppressed by
+the ordinary course of Judicial proceedings, or by the powers vested in
+the Marshals by law; now, therefore I, ABRAHAM LINCOLN, President of the
+United States, in virtue of the power in me vested by the Constitution
+and the laws, have thought fit to call forth, and hereby do call forth,
+the Militia of the several States of the Union to the aggregate number
+of 75,000, in order to suppress said Combinations, and to cause the laws
+to be duly executed.</p>
+
+<p>"The details for this object will be immediately communicated to the
+State authorities through the War Department. I appeal to all loyal
+citizens to favor, facilitate, and aid this effort to maintain the
+honor, the integrity, and existence of our National Union, and the
+perpetuity of popular government, and to redress wrongs already long
+enough endured. I deem it proper to say that the first service assigned
+to the forces hereby called forth, will probably be to repossess the
+forts, places, and property which have been seized from the Union; and
+in every event the utmost care will be observed, consistently with the
+objects aforesaid, to avoid any devastation, any destruction of, or
+interference with, property, or any disturbance of peaceful citizens of
+any part of the Country; and I hereby command the persons composing the
+Combinations aforesaid, to disperse and retire peaceably to their
+respective abodes, within twenty days from this date.</p>
+
+<p>"Deeming that the present condition of public affairs presents an
+extraordinary occasion, I do hereby, in virtue of the power in me vested
+by the Constitution, convene both Houses of Congress. The Senators and
+Representatives are, therefore, summoned to assemble at their respective
+chambers at twelve o'clock, noon, on Thursday, the 4th day of July next,
+then and there to consider and determine such measures as, in their
+wisdom, the public safety and interest may seem to demand.</p>
+
+<p>"In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of
+the United States to be affixed.</p>
+
+<p>"Done at the city of Washington, this fifteenth day of April, in the
+year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-one, and of the
+independence of the United States the eighty-fifth.</p>
+
+<p>"By the President: ABRAHAM LINCOLN.</p>
+
+<p>"WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State."</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>
+While in the North the official responses to this Call for troops were
+prompt and patriotic, in the Border and Slave States, not yet in
+Rebellion, they were anything but encouraging.</p>
+
+<p>The reply of Governor Burton, of Delaware, was by the issue of a
+proclamation "recommending the formation of volunteer companies for the
+protection of the lives and property of the people of Delaware against
+violence of any sort to which they may be exposed; the companies not
+being subject to be ordered by the Executive into the United States
+service&mdash;the law not vesting him with such authority&mdash;but having the
+option of offering their services to the General Government for the
+defense of its capital and the support of the Constitution and laws of
+the Country."</p>
+
+<p>Governor Hicks, of Maryland, in like manner, issued a proclamation for
+Maryland's quota of the troops, but stated that her four regiments would
+be detailed to serve within the limits of Maryland&mdash;or, for the defense
+of the National Capital.</p>
+
+<p>Governor Letcher, of Virginia, replied: "The militia of Virginia will
+not be furnished to the powers at Washington for any such use or purpose
+as they have in view. Your object is to subjugate the Southern States,
+and a requisition made upon me for such an object&mdash;an object, in my
+judgment, not within the purview of the Constitution or the Act of 1795
+&mdash;will not be complied with. You have chosen to inaugurate Civil War,
+and having done so, we will meet it in a spirit as determined as the
+Administration has exhibited toward the South."</p>
+
+<p>Governor Ellis, of North Carolina, replied to Secretary Cameron: "Your
+dispatch is received, and, if genuine&mdash;which its extraordinary character
+leads me to doubt&mdash;I have to say in reply that I regard the levy of
+troops made by the Administration, for the purpose of subjugating the
+States of the South, as in violation of the Constitution and a
+usurpation of power. I can be no party to this wicked violation of the
+laws of the country, and to this War upon the liberties of a free
+people. You can get no troops from North Carolina. I will reply more
+in detail when your Call is received by mail."</p>
+
+<p>Governor Magoffin, of Kentucky, replied: "Your dispatch is received. In
+answer I say emphatically, Kentucky will furnish no troops for the
+wicked purpose of subduing her sister Southern States."</p>
+
+<p>Governor Harris, of Tennessee, replied: "Tennessee will not furnish a
+single man for Coercion, but fifty thousand, if necessary, for the
+Defense of our rights or those of our Southern brethren."</p>
+
+<p>Governor Jackson, of Missouri, replied: "Your requisition is illegal,
+unconstitutional, revolutionary, inhuman, diabolical and cannot be
+complied with."</p>
+
+<p>Governor Rector, of Arkansas, replied: "None will be furnished. The
+demand is only adding insult to injury."</p>
+
+<p>Discouraging and even insulting as were most of these replies, the
+responses of the Governors of the Free States were, on the other hand,
+full of the ring of true martial Patriotism evoked by the fall of Sumter
+and the President's first call for troops. Twenty millions of Northern
+hearts were stirred by that Call, as they had never before been stirred.
+Party and faction became for the moment, a thing of the past.</p>
+
+<p>The Governors of the Free States made instant proclamation for
+volunteers, and the People responded not by thousands but by hundreds of
+thousands. New York, the Empire State, by her Governor and her
+Legislature placed all her tremendous resources at the service of the
+Union; and the great State of Pennsylvania, through Governor Curtin, did
+the same. Nor were the other States at all behind.</p>
+
+<p>The Loyal North felt that Law, Order, Liberty, the existence of the
+Nation itself was in peril, and must be both saved and vindicated. Over
+half a million of men&mdash;from the prairies of the West and the hills and
+cities of the East&mdash;from farms and counting houses, from factories and
+mines and workshops&mdash;sprang to arms at the Call, and begged to be
+enrolled. The merchants and capitalists throughout the North proffered
+to the Government their wealth and influence and best services. The
+press and the people responded as only the press and people of a Free
+land can respond&mdash;with all their heart and soul. "Fort Sumter," said
+one of the journals, "is lost, but Freedom is saved. Henceforth, the
+Loyal States are a unit in uncompromising hostility to Treason, wherever
+plotted, however justified. Fort Sumter is temporarily lost, but the
+Country is saved. Live the Republic!"</p>
+
+<p>This, in a nutshell, was the feeling everywhere expressed, whether by
+the great crowds that marched through the streets of Northern cities
+with drums beating and banners flying&mdash;cheering wildly for the Union,
+singing Union songs, and compelling those of doubtful loyalty to throw
+out to the breeze from their homes the glorified Stars and Stripes&mdash;by
+the great majority of newspapers&mdash;by the pulpit, by the rostrum, by the
+bench, by all of whatever profession or calling in Northern life. For
+the moment, the voice of the Rebel-sympathizer was hushed in the land,
+or so tremendously overborne that it seemed as if there was an absolute
+unanimity of love for the Union.</p>
+
+<p>Of course, in Border-States, bound to the South by ties of lineage and
+intermarriage and politics and business association, the feeling could
+not be the same as elsewhere. There, they were, so to speak, drawn both
+ways at once, by the beckoning hands of kindred on the one side, and
+Country on the other! Thus they long waited and hesitated, praying that
+something might yet happen to save the Union of their fathers, and
+prevent the shedding of brothers' blood, by brothers&mdash;hoping against
+hope-waited, in the belief that a position of armed neutrality might be
+permitted to them; and grieved, when they found this could not be.</p>
+
+<p>Each side to the great Conflict-at-arms naturally enough believed itself
+right, and that the other side was the first aggressor; but the judgment
+of Mankind has placed the blame where it properly belonged&mdash;on the
+shoulders of the Rebels. The calm, clear statement of President
+Lincoln, in his July Message to Congress, touching the assault and its
+preceding history&mdash;together with his conclusions&mdash;states the whole
+matter in such authentic and convincing manner that it may be said to
+have settled the point beyond further controversy. After stating that
+it "was resolved to notify the Governor of South Carolina that he might
+expect an attempt would be made to provision the Fort; and that if the
+attempt should not be resisted there would be no effort to throw in men,
+arms, or ammunition, without further notice, or in case of an attack on
+the Fort," Mr. Lincoln continues: "This notice was accordingly given;
+whereupon the Fort was attacked and bombarded to its fall, without even
+awaiting the arrival of the provisioning expedition."</p>
+
+<p>The President then proceeds: "It is thus seen that the assault upon and
+reduction of Fort Sumter was, in no sense, a matter of self-defense on
+the part of the assailants. They well knew that the garrison in the
+Fort could, by no possibility, commit aggression upon them. They
+knew&mdash;they were expressly notified&mdash;that the giving of bread to the few brave
+and hungry men of the garrison was all which would on that occasion be
+attempted, unless themselves, by resisting so much, should provoke more.
+They knew that this Government desired to keep the garrison in the Fort
+&mdash;not to assail them&mdash;but merely to maintain visible possession, and
+thus to preserve the Union from actual and immediate
+dissolution&mdash;trusting, as hereinbefore stated, to time, discussion, and the
+ballot-box for final adjustment; and they assailed and reduced the Fort for
+precisely the reverse object&mdash;to drive out the visible authority of the
+Federal Union, and thus force it to immediate dissolution.</p>
+
+<p>"That this was their object, the Executive well understood; and, having
+said to them, in the Inaugural Address, 'you can have no conflict
+without being yourselves the aggressors,' he took pains not only to keep
+this declaration good, but also to keep the case so free from the power
+of ingenious sophistry as that the World should not be able to
+misunderstand it.</p>
+
+<p>"By the affair at Fort Sumter, with its surrounding circumstances, that
+point was reached. Then and thereby the assailants of the Government
+began the Conflict of arms, without a gun in sight or in expectancy to
+return their fire, save only the few in the Fort sent to that harbor
+years before for their own protection, and still ready to give that
+protection in whatever was lawful. In this act, discarding all else,
+they have forced upon the Country, the distinct issue: 'Immediate
+dissolution or blood.'</p>
+
+<p>"And this issue embraces more than the fate of these United States. It
+presents to the whole family of Man the question whether a
+Constitutional Republic or Democracy&mdash;a government of the People by the
+same People&mdash;can or cannot maintain its territorial integrity against
+its own domestic foes. It presents the question whether discontented
+individuals, too few in numbers to control administration according to
+organic law in any case, can always, upon the pretences made in this
+case, or on any other pretences, or arbitrarily without any pretence,
+break up their Government, and thus practically put an end to free
+government upon the earth. It forces us to ask: 'Is there in all
+republics, this inherent and fatal weakness?' 'Must a Government of
+necessity be too strong for the liberties of its own people, or too weak
+to maintain its own existence?'</p>
+
+<p>"So viewing the issue, no choice was left but to call out the War power
+of the Government; and so to resist force, employed for its destruction,
+by force, for its preservation."</p>
+
+<p>The Call for Troops was made, as we have seen, on the 15th day of April.
+On the evening of the following day several companies of a Pennsylvania
+Regiment reported for duty in Washington. On the 18th, more
+Pennsylvania Volunteers, including a company of Artillery, arrived
+there.</p>
+
+<p>On the 19th of April, the Sixth Massachusetts Regiment&mdash;whose progress
+through New York city had been triumphal&mdash;was suddenly and unexpectedly
+assailed, in its passage through Baltimore, to the defense of the
+National Capital, by a howling mob of Maryland Secessionists&mdash;worked up
+to a pitch of States-rights frenzy by Confederate emissaries and
+influential Baltimore Secession-sympathizers, by news of the sudden
+evacuation of the Federal Arsenal at Harper's Ferry, and other exciting
+tidings&mdash;and had to fight its way through, leaving three soldiers of
+that regiment dead, and a number wounded, behind it.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [At a meeting of the "National Volunteer Association," at Monument
+ Square, Baltimore, the previous evening, says Greeley's History of
+ the American Conflict, page 462, "None of the speakers directly
+ advocated attacks on the Northern troops about to pass through the
+ city; but each was open in his hostility to 'Coercion,' and
+ ardently exhorted his hearers to organize, arm and drill, for the
+ Conflict now inevitable. Carr (Wilson C. N. Carr) said: 'I do not
+ care how many Federal troops are sent to Washington; they will soon
+ find themselves surrounded by such an army from Virginia and
+ Maryland, that escape to their homes will be impossible; and when
+ the 75,000 who are intended to invade the South shall have polluted
+ that soil with their touch, the South will extermininate and sweep
+ them from the Earth.' (Frantic cheering and yelling). The meeting
+ broke up with stentorian cheers for 'the South' and for 'President
+ Davis."']</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Ten companies of Philadelphia troops, reaching Baltimore at the same
+time, unarmed, were also violently assailed by the crazy mob, and, after
+a two hours' fight, reached the cars and returned to Philadelphia.</p>
+
+<p>Washington City&mdash;already, by the Secession of Virginia, cut off from the
+South&mdash;was thus practically cut off from the North as well; and to
+isolate it more completely, the telegraph wires were cut down and the
+railroad bridges burned. A mere handful of regulars, the few volunteers
+that had got through before the outbreak in Baltimore, and a small
+number of Union residents and Government department clerks&mdash;these, under
+General Winfield Scott, constituted the paltry force that, for ten days
+after the Call for troops, held the National Capital.</p>
+
+<p>Informed, as the Rebels must have been, by their swarming spies, of the
+weakness of the Federal metropolis, it seems absolutely marvelous that
+instant advantage was not taken of it.</p>
+
+<p>The Richmond Examiner, of April 23d, said: "The capture of Washington
+City is perfectly within the power of Virginia and Maryland, if Virginia
+will only make the effort with her constituted authorities; nor is there
+a single moment to lose. * * * The fanatical yell for the immediate
+subjugation of the whole South is going up hourly from the united voices
+of all the North; and, for the purpose of making their work sure, they
+have determined to hold Washington City as the point whence to carry on
+their brutal warfare. Our people can take it&mdash;they will take it&mdash;and
+Scott, the arch-traitor, and Lincoln, the Beast, combined, cannot
+prevent it. The just indignation of an outraged and deeply injured
+people will teach the Illinois Ape to repeat his race and retrace his
+journey across the borders of the Free Negro States still more rapidly
+than he came. * * * Great cleansing and purification are needed and
+will be given to that festering sink of iniquity, that wallow of Lincoln
+and Scott&mdash;the desecrated city of Washington; and many indeed will be
+the carcasses of dogs and caitiff that will blacken the air upon the
+gallows before the great work is accomplished. So let it be!"</p>
+
+<p>But despite all this fanfaronade of brutal bluster, and various
+movements that looked somewhat threatening, and this complete isolation
+for more than a week from the rest of the World, the city of Washington
+was not seized by the Rebels, after all.</p>
+
+<p>This nervous condition of affairs, however, existed until the 25th&mdash;and
+to General Benjamin F. Butler is due the chief credit of putting an end
+to it. It seems he had reached the Susquehanna river at Perryville,
+with his Eighth Massachusetts Regiment on the 20th&mdash;the day after the
+Sixth Massachusetts had been mobbed at Baltimore&mdash;and, finding his
+further progress to Washington via Baltimore, barred by the destruction
+of the bridge across the Susquehanna, etc., he at once seized a large
+ferry steamer, embarked his men on her, steamed down the river and
+Chesapeake Bay to Annapolis, the capital of Maryland, took possession of
+the frigate Constitution, the Naval Academy, and the city itself,
+gathered supplies, and being reinforced by the arrival by water of the
+famous New York Seventh, and other regiments, repaired the branch
+railroad to Annapolis Junction (on the main line of railroad between
+Baltimore and Washington), and transferred his column from thence, by
+cars, on the 25th, to the National Capital&mdash;soon thereafter also taking
+military possession of Baltimore, which gave no further trouble to the
+Union Cause. In the meantime, however, other untoward events to that
+Cause had happened.</p>
+
+<p>Two days after the Call for troops, the Virginia Convention (April 17th)
+secretly voted to Secede from the Union. An expedition of Virginia
+troops was almost at once started to capture the Federal Arsenal at
+Harper's Ferry, which, as has already been intimated, was evacuated
+hastily on the night of the 18th, by the handful of Union regulars
+garrisoning it, after a futile effort to destroy the public property and
+stores it held. Another expedition was started to seize the Federal
+Navy Yard at Norfolk&mdash;a rich prize, containing as it did, between 2,000
+and 3,000 pieces of heavy ordnance (300 of them Dahlgrens), three old
+line-of-battle ships and a number of frigates, including the Cumberland
+and the fine forty-gun steam frigate Merrimac, together with thousands
+of kegs of powder and immense stores of other munitions of war, and
+supplies&mdash;that had cost in all some $10,000,000. Without an enemy in
+sight, however, this fine Navy Yard was shamefully evacuated, after
+partly scuttling and setting fire to the vessels&mdash;the Cumberland alone
+being towed away&mdash;and spiking the guns, and doing other not very
+material damage.</p>
+
+<p>So also, in North Carolina, Rebel influence was equally active. On the
+20th of April Governor Ellis seized the Federal Branch Mint at,
+Charlotte, and on the 22d the Federal Arsenal at Fayetteville. A few
+days thereafter his Legislature authorized him to tender to
+Virginia&mdash;which had already joined the Confederacy&mdash;or to the Government of the
+Confederate States itself, the volunteer forces of North Carolina. And,
+although at the end of January the people of that State had decided at
+the polls that no Secession Convention be held, yet the subservient
+Legislature did not hesitate, on demand, to call one together which met
+in May and ordained such Secession.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, by the end of May, 1861, the Confederacy had grown to comprise
+nine instead of seven States, and the Confederate troops were
+concentrating on Richmond&mdash;whither the Rebel Government was soon to
+remove, from Montgomery.</p>
+
+<p>By this time also not only had the ranks of the regular Union Army been
+filled and largely added to, but 42,000 additional volunteers had been
+called out by President Lincoln; and the blockade of the Southern ports
+(including those of Virginia and North Carolina) that had been
+proclaimed by him, was, despite all obstacles, now becoming effectual
+and respected.</p>
+
+<p>Washington City and its suburbs, by the influx of Union volunteers, had
+during this month become a vast armed camp; the Potomac river had been
+crossed and the Virginia hills (including Arlington heights) which
+overlooked the Federal Capital, had been occupied and fortified by Union
+troops; the young and gallant Colonel Ellsworth had been killed by a
+Virginia Rebel while pulling down a Rebel flag in Alexandria; and
+General Benjamin F. Butler, in command at Fortress Monroe, had by an
+inspiration, solved one of the knottiest points confronting our armies,
+by declaring of three Negroes who had fled from their master so as to
+escape working on Rebel fortifications, that they should not be returned
+to that master&mdash;under the Fugitive Slave Law, as demanded by a Rebel
+officer with a flag of truce&mdash;but were confiscated "property," and would
+be retained, as "contraband of war."</p>
+
+<p>It was about this time, too, that the New Orleans Picayune fell into
+line with other unscrupulous Rebel sheets, by gravely declaring that:
+"All the Massachusetts troops now in Washington are Negroes, with the
+exception of two or three drummer boys. General Butler, in command, is
+a native of Liberia. Our readers may recollect old Ben, the barber, who
+kept a shop in Poydras street, and emigrated to Liberia with a small
+competence. General Butler is his son." Little did the writer of that
+paragraph dream how soon New Orleans would crouch at the very feet of
+that same General!</p>
+
+<p>And now, while the armed hosts on either side are assembling in hostile
+array, or resting on their arms, preliminary to the approaching fray of
+battle, let us glance at the alleged causes underlying this great
+Rebellion against the Union.</p>
+
+<br><br>
+
+
+
+
+
+<center>
+<table summary="" cellPadding=4 border=3>
+<tr><td>
+
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="p1.htm">Previous Part</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</td><td>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7140-h.htm">Main Index</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</td><td>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="p3.htm">Next Part</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+
+</td></tr>
+</table>
+</center>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</body>
+</html>