summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/orig7140-h/p6.htm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/orig7140-h/p6.htm')
-rw-r--r--old/orig7140-h/p6.htm3240
1 files changed, 3240 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/orig7140-h/p6.htm b/old/orig7140-h/p6.htm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ce2e9dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/old/orig7140-h/p6.htm
@@ -0,0 +1,3240 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
+<html>
+<head>
+<title>THE GREAT CONSPIRACY, Part 6</title>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
+
+<style type="text/css">
+ <!--
+ body {background:#faebd7; margin:10%; text-align:justify}
+ P {
+ text-indent: 1em;
+ margin-top: .75em;
+ margin-bottom: .75em; }
+ H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; }
+ HR { width: 33%; text-align: center; }
+ blockquote {font-size: 95% }
+ .figleft {float: left;}
+ .figright {float: right;}
+ .toc { margin-left: 15%; margin-bottom: 0em;}
+ CENTER { padding: 10px;}
+ // -->
+</style>
+
+</head>
+<body>
+
+
+
+<h2>THE GREAT CONSPIRACY, Part 6</h2>
+
+
+<center>
+<table summary="" cellPadding=4 border=3>
+<tr><td>
+
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="p5.htm">Previous Part</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</td><td>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7140-h.htm">Main Index</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</td><td>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="p7.htm">Next Part</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+
+</td></tr>
+</table>
+</center>
+
+
+
+<br><br><br><br><br><br>
+
+
+
+
+<center>
+<h1>
+<br>
+ THE GREAT CONSPIRACY<br><br>
+<br>
+ Its Origin and History<br><br><br>
+<br>
+ Part 6.<br><br><br>
+
+ By John Logan
+<br></h1>
+<br>
+ <h2>
+
+ <br><br><br><br><br>
+ <img alt="titlepage.jpg (65K)" src="images/titlepage.jpg" height="1134" width="692">
+ <br><br><br><br><br>
+ <img alt="frontspiece.jpg (101K)" src="images/frontspiece.jpg" height="934" width="665">
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+<br><br><br>
+CONTENTS
+</h2></center>
+<br>
+<br>
+
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2> <a href="#ch22">CHAPTER XXII</a>.<br>
+ FREEDOM'S SUN STILL RISING.<br></h2>
+<br>
+DEFINITE CONGRESSIONAL ACTION, ON EMANCIPATION, GERMINATING&mdash;GLORIOUS
+NEWS FROM THE WEST AND EAST&mdash;FALL OF VICKSBURG&mdash;GETTYSBURG&mdash;LINCOLN'S
+GETTYSBURG ORATION&mdash;THE DRAFT&mdash;THE REBEL "FIRE IN THE REAR"&mdash;DRAFT RIOTS
+IN NEW YORK&mdash;LINCOLN'S LETTER, AUGUST, 1863, ON THE
+SITUATION&mdash;CHATTANOOGA&mdash;THE CHEERING FALL-ELECTIONS&mdash;VALLANDIGHAM'S
+DEFEAT&mdash;EMANCIPATION AS A "POLITICAL" MEASURE&mdash;"THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT" REPORTED
+IN THE SENATE&mdash;THADDEUS STEVENS'S RESOLUTIONS, AND TEST VOTE IN THE
+HOUSE&mdash;LOVEJOY'S DEATH&mdash;ELOQUENT TRIBUTES OF ARNOLD, WASHBURNE,
+GRINNELL, THADDEUS STEVENS, AND SUMNER
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch23">CHAPTER XXIII.</a><br>
+ "THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT" IN THE SENATE.<br></h2>
+<br>
+GREAT DEBATE IN THE U. S. SENATE, ON EMANCIPATION&mdash;THE WHOLE VILLANOUS
+HISTORY OF SLAVERY, LAID BARE&mdash;SPEECHES OF TRUMBULL, HENRY WILSON,
+HARLAN, SHERMAN, CLARK, HALL, HENDERSON, SUMNER, REVERDY JOHNSON,
+MCDOUGALL, SAULSBURY, GARRETT DAVIS, POWELL, AND HENDRICKS&mdash;BRILLIANT
+ARRAIGNMENT AND DEFENSE OF "THE INSTITUTION"&mdash;U. S. GRANT, NOW "GENERAL
+IN CHIEF"&mdash;HIS PLANS PERFECTED, HE GOES TO THE VIRGINIA FRONT&mdash;MR.
+LINCOLN'S SOLICITUDE FOR THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT&mdash;BORDER&mdash;STATE
+OBSTRUCTIVE MOTIONS, AMENDMENTS, AND SUBSTITUTES, ALL VOTED DOWN&mdash;MR.
+LINCOLN'S LETTER TO HODGES, OF KENTUCKY, REVIEWING EMANCIPATION AS A
+WAR MEASURE&mdash;THE DECISIVE FIELD-DAY (APRIL 8, 1864)&mdash;THE DEBATE ABLY
+CLOSED&mdash;THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PASSED BY THE SENATE
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch24">CHAPTER XXIV.</a><br>
+ TREASON IN THE NORTHERN CAMPS.<br></h2>
+<br>
+EMANCIPATION TEST&mdash;VOTES IN THE HOUSE&mdash;ARNOLD'S RESOLUTION&mdash;BLUE
+PROSPECTS FOR THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT&mdash;LINCOLN'S ANXIETY&mdash;CONGRESSIONAL
+COPPERHEADS&mdash;THINLY-DISGUISED TREASON&mdash;SPEECHES OF VOORHEES, WASHBURNE,
+AND KELLEY&mdash;SPRINGFIELD COPPERHEAD PEACE-CONVENTION&mdash;"THE UNION AS IT
+WAS"&mdash;PEACE ON ANY TERMS&mdash;VALLANDIGHAM'S LIEUTENANTS&mdash;ATTITUDE OF COX,
+DAVIS, SAULSBURY, WOOD, LONG, ALLEN, HOLMAN, AND OTHERS&mdash;NORTHERN
+ENCOURAGEMENT TO REBELS&mdash;CONSEQUENT SECOND INVASION, OF THE NORTH, BY
+LEE&mdash;500,000 TREASONABLE NORTHERN "SONS OF LIBERTY"&mdash;RITUAL AND OATHS OF
+THE "K. G. C." AND "O. A. K."&mdash;COPPERHEAD EFFORTS TO SPLIT THE NORTH
+AND WEST, ON TARIFF-ISSUES&mdash;SPALDING AND THAD. STEVENS DENOUNCE
+TREASON-BREEDING COPPERHEADS
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch25">CHAPTER XXV.</a><br>
+ THE "FIRE IN THE REAR."<br></h2>
+<br>
+THE REBEL MANDATE&mdash;"AGITATE THE NORTH!"&mdash;OBEDIENT COPPERHEADS&mdash;THEIR
+DENUNCIATIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT&mdash;BROOKS, FERNANDO WOOD, AND WHITE, ON
+THE "FOLLY" OF THE WAR FOR THE UNION&mdash;EDGERTON'S PEACE
+RESOLUTIONS&mdash;ECKLEY, ON COPPERHEAD MALIGNITY&mdash;ALEXANDER LONG GOES "A BOW-SHOT BEYOND
+THEM ALL"&mdash;HE PROPOSES THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SOUTHERN
+INDEPENDENCE&mdash;GARFIELD ELOQUENTLY DENOUNCES LONG'S TREASON&mdash;LONG DEFIANTLY REITERATES
+IT&mdash;SPEAKER COLFAX OFFERS A RESOLUTION TO EXPEL LONG&mdash;COX AND JULIAN'S
+VERBAL DUEL&mdash;HARRIS'S TREASONABLE BID FOR EXPULSION&mdash;EXTRAORDINARY SCENE
+IN THE HOUSE&mdash;FERNANDO WOOD'S BID&mdash;HE SUBSEQUENTLY "WEAKENS"&mdash;EXCITING
+DEBATE&mdash;LONG AND HARRIS VOTED "UNWORTHY MEMBERS" OF THE HOUSE
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch26">CHAPTER XXVI.</a><br>
+ "THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT" DEFEATED IN THE HOUSE.<br></h2>
+<br>
+GLANCE AT THE MILITARY SITUATION&mdash;"BEGINNING OF THE END"&mdash;THE
+CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT&mdash;HOLMAN "OBJECTS" TO "SECOND READING"&mdash;KELLOGG
+SCORES THE COPPERHEAD-DEMOCRACY&mdash;CONTINUOUS "FIRE IN THE REAR" IN BOTH
+HOUSES&mdash;THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT ATTACKED&mdash;THE ADMINISTRATION
+ATTACKED&mdash;THE TARIFF ATTACKED&mdash;SPEECHES OF GARRETT DAVIS, AND
+COX&mdash;PEACE-RESOLUTIONS OF LAZEAR AND DAVIS&mdash;GRINNELL AND STEVENS, SCORE COX AND
+WOOD&mdash;HENDRICKS ON THE DRAFT&mdash;"ON" TO RICHMOND AND ATLANTA&mdash;VIOLENT
+DIATRIBES OF WOOD, AND HOLMAN&mdash;FARNSWORTH'S REPLY TO ROSS, PRUYN, AND
+OTHERS&mdash;ARNOLD, ON THE ETHICS OF SLAVERY&mdash;INGERSOLL'S ELOQUENT
+BURST&mdash;RANDALL, ROLLINS, AND PENDLETON, CLOSING THE DEBATE&mdash;THE THIRTEENTH
+AMENDMENT DEFEATED&mdash;ASHLEY'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER&mdash;CONGRESS ADJOURNS
+<br>
+<br>
+ <h2><a href="#ch27">CHAPTER XXVII.</a><br>
+ SLAVERY DOOMED AT THE POLLS.<br></h2>
+<br>
+THE ISSUE BETWEEN FREEDOM AND SLAVERY&mdash;MR. LINCOLN'S
+RENOMINATION&mdash;ENDORSED, AT ALL POINTS, BY HIS PARTY&mdash;HIS FAITH IN THE PEOPLE&mdash;HORATIO
+SEYMOUR'S COPPERHEAD DECLARATIONS&mdash;THE NATIONAL DEMOCRACY DECLARE THE
+WAR "A FAILURE"&mdash;THEIR COPPERHEAD PLATFORM, AND UNION
+CANDIDATE&mdash;MCCLELLAN THEIR NOMINEE&mdash;VICTORIES AT ATLANTA AND MOBILE&mdash;FREMONT'S
+THIRD PARTY&mdash;SUCCESSES OF GRANT AND SHERIDAN&mdash;DEATH OF CHIEF-JUSTICE
+TANEY&mdash;MARYLAND BECOMES "FREE"&mdash;MORE UNION VICTORIES&mdash;REPUBLICAN
+"TIDAL-WAVE" SUCCESS&mdash;LINCOLN RE-ELECTED&mdash;HIS SERENADE-SPEECHES&mdash;AMAZING
+CONGRESSIONAL-RETURNS&mdash;THE DEATH OF SLAVERY INSURED&mdash;IT BECOMES SIMPLY A
+MATTER OF TIME
+<br>
+<br>
+<br><br><br><br>
+<h4>PORTRAITS.</h4>
+<center>
+<table summary="">
+<tr><td>
+
+<a href="#butler">BENJ. F. BUTLER</a><br>
+<a href="#trumbell">LYMAN TRUMBULL</a><br>
+<a href="#wade">BENJ. F. WADE</a><br>
+<a href="#mcclellan">GEO. B. MCCLELLAN</a><br>
+
+
+
+</td></tr>
+</table>
+</center>
+
+<br><br>
+<br><br><br>
+<a name="butler"></a>
+<center>
+<img alt="p502-butler.jpg (85K)" src="images/p502-butler.jpg" height="863" width="584">
+</center>
+<br><br><br>
+<a name="ch22"></a>
+<br><br>
+
+
+<center><h2>
+ CHAPTER XXII.<br>
+<br>
+ FREEDOM'S SUN STILL RISING.<br>
+</h2>
+<br>
+</center>
+<p>After President Lincoln had issued his Proclamation of Emancipation, the
+friends of Freedom clearly perceived&mdash;and none of them more clearly than
+himself that until the incorporation of that great Act into the
+Constitution of the United States itself, there could be no real
+assurance of safety to the liberties of the emancipated; that unless
+this were done there would be left, even after the suppression of the
+Rebellion, a living spark of dissension which might at any time again be
+fanned into the flames of Civil War.</p>
+
+<p>Hence, at all proper times, Mr. Lincoln favored and even
+urged Congressional action upon the subject. It was not, however, until
+the following year that definite action may be said to have commenced in
+Congress toward that end; and, as Congress was slow, he found it
+necessary to say in his third Annual Message: "while I remain in my
+present position I shall not attempt to retract or modify the
+Emancipation Proclamation; nor shall I return to Slavery any person who
+is Free by the terms of that Proclamation, or by any of the Acts of
+Congress."</p>
+
+<p>Meantime, however, occurred the series of glorious
+Union victories in the West, ending with the surrender to Grant's
+triumphant Forces on the 4th of July, 1863, of Vicksburg&mdash;"the Gibraltar
+of the West"&mdash;with its Garrison, Army, and enormous quantities of arms
+and munitions of war; thus closing a brilliant and successful Campaign
+with a blow which literally "broke the back" of the Rebellion; while,
+almost simultaneously, July 1-3, the Union Forces of the East, under
+Meade, gained the great victory of Gettysburg, and, driving the hosts of
+Lee from Pennsylvania, put a second and final end to Rebel invasion of
+Northern soil; gaining it, on ground dedicated by President Lincoln,
+before that year had closed&mdash;as a place of sepulture for the
+Patriot-soldiers who there had fallen in a brief, touching and immortal Address,
+which every American child should learn by heart, and every American
+adult ponder deeply, as embodying the very essence of true
+Republicanism.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [President Lincoln's Address, when the National Cemetery at
+ Gettysburg, Pa., was dedicated Nov. 19, 1863, was in these
+ memorable words:</p>
+
+<p> "Fourscore and seven years ago, our Fathers brought forth upon this
+ continent a new Nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the
+ proposition that all men are created equal.</p>
+
+<p> "Now we are engaged in a great Civil War, testing whether that
+ Nation, or any Nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long
+ endure.</p>
+
+<p> "We are met on a great battlefield of that War. We have come here
+ to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for
+ those who here gave their lives that that Nation might live.</p>
+
+<p> "It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.</p>
+
+<p> "But in a larger sense, we can not dedicate, we can not consecrate,
+ we can not hallow, this ground. The brave men, living and dead,
+ who struggled here, have consecrated it far above our power to add
+ or detract.</p>
+
+<p> "The World will little note, nor long remember, what we say here;
+ but it can never forget what they did here.</p>
+
+<p> "It is for us, the living, rather to be dedicated here to the
+ unfinished work which they who fought here have, thus far, so nobly
+ advanced.</p>
+
+<p> "It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task
+ remaining before us; that from these honored dead we take increased
+ devotion to that Cause for which they gave the last full measure of
+ devotion; that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not
+ have died in vain; that this Nation, under God, shall have a new
+ birth of Freedom; and that Government of the People, by the People,
+ and for the People, shall not perish front the Earth."]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>That season of victory for the Union arms, coming, as it did, upon a
+season of depression and doubtfulness, was doubly grateful to the loyal
+heart of the Nation. Daylight seemed to be breaking at last.
+Gettysburg had hurled back the Southern invader from our soil; and
+Vicksburg, with the immediately resulting surrender of Port Hudson, had
+opened the Mississippi river from Cairo to the Gulf, and split the
+Confederacy in twain.</p>
+
+<p>But it happened just about this time that, the enrollment of the whole
+Militia of the United States (under the Act of March, 1863), having been
+completed, and a Draft for 300,000 men ordered to be made and executed,
+if by a subsequent time the quotas of the various States should not be
+filled by volunteering, certain malcontents and Copperheads, inspired by
+agents and other friends of the Southern Conspirators, started and
+fomented, in the city of New York, a spirit of unreasoning opposition
+both to voluntary enlistment, and conscription under the Draft, that
+finally culminated, July 13th, in a terrible Riot, lasting several days,
+during which that great metropolis was in the hands, and completely at
+the mercy, of a brutal mob of Secession sympathizers, who made day and
+night hideous with their drunken bellowings, terrorized everybody even
+suspected of love for the Union, plundered and burned dwellings,
+including a Colored Orphan Asylum, and added to the crime of arson, that
+of murdering the mob-chased, terror-stricken Negroes, by hanging them to
+the lamp-posts.</p>
+
+<p>These Riots constituted a part of that "Fire in the Rear" with which the
+Rebels and their Northern Democratic sympathizers had so frequently
+menaced the Armies of the Union.</p>
+
+<p>Alluding to them, the N. Y. Tribune on July 15th, while its office was
+invested and threatened with attack and demolition, bravely said: "They
+are, in purpose and in essence, a Diversion in favor of Jefferson Davis
+and Lee. Listen to the yells of the mob and the harangues of its
+favorite orators, and you will find them surcharged with 'Nigger,'
+'Abolition,' 'Black Republican,' denunciation of prominent Republicans,
+The Tribune, etc. etc.&mdash;all very wide of the Draft and the exemption.
+Had the Abolitionists, instead of the Slaveholders, revolted, and
+undertaken to upset the Government and dissolve the Union, nine-tenths
+of these rioters would have eagerly volunteered to put them down. It is
+the fear, stimulated by the recent and glorious triumphs of the Union
+Arms, that Slavery and the Rebellion must suffer, which is at the bottom
+of all this arson, devastation, robbery, and murder."</p>
+
+<p>The Democratic Governor, Seymour, by promising to "have this Draft
+suspended and stopped," did something toward quieting the Riots, but it
+was not until the Army of the Potomac, now following Lee's retreat, was
+weakened by the sending of several regiments to New York that the
+Draft-rioting spirit, in that city, and to a less extent in other cities, was
+thoroughly cowed.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [In reply to Gov. Seymour's appeal for delay in the execution of
+ the Draft Law, in order to test its Constitutionality, Mr. Lincoln,
+ on the 7th of August, said he could not consent to lose the time
+ that would be involved in obtaining a decision from the U. S.
+ Supreme Court on that point, and proceeded: "We are contending with
+ an Enemy who, as I understand, drives every able-bodied man he can
+ reach into his ranks, very much as a butcher drives bullocks into a
+ slaughter-pen. No time is wasted, no argument is used.</p>
+
+<p> "This system produces an Army which will soon turn upon our now
+ victorious soldiers already in the field, if they shall not be
+ sustained by recruits as they should be.</p>
+
+<p> It produces an Army with a rapidity not to be matched on our side,
+ if we first waste time to re-experiment with the Volunteer system,
+ already deemed by Congress, and palpably, in fact, so far exhausted
+ as to be inadequate; and then more time to obtain a Court decision
+ as to whether a law is Constitutional which requires a part of
+ those not now in the Service to go to those who are already in it,
+ and still more time to determine with absolute certainty that we
+ get those who are to go, in the precisely legal proportion to those
+ who are not to go.</p>
+
+<p> "My purpose is to be in my action Just and Constitutional, and yet
+ Practical, in performing the important duty with which I am
+ charged, of maintaining the Unity and the Free principles of our
+ common Country."]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Worried and weakened by this Democratic opposition to the Draft, and the
+threatened consequent delays and dangers to the success of the Union
+Cause, and depressed moreover by the defeat of the National forces under
+Rosecrans at Chickamauga; yet, the favorable determination of the Fall
+elections on the side of Union and Freedom, and the immense majorities
+upholding those issues, together with Grant's great victory (November,
+1863) of Chattanooga&mdash;where the three days of fighting in the
+Chattanooga Valley and up among the clouds of Lookout Mountain and
+Mission Ridge, not only effaced the memory of Rosecrans's previous
+disaster, but brought fresh and imperishable laurels to the Union
+Arms&mdash;stiffened the President's backbone, and that of Union men everywhere.</p>
+
+<p>Not that Mr. Lincoln had shown any signs of weakness or wavering, or any
+loss of hope in the ultimate result of this War for the preservation of
+the Union&mdash;which now also involved Freedom to all beneath its banner.
+On the contrary, a letter of his written late in August shows
+conclusively enough that he even then began to see clearly the coming
+final triumph&mdash;not perhaps as "speedy," as he would like, in its coming,
+but none the less sure to come in God's "own good time," and furthermore
+not appearing "to be so distant as it did" before Gettysburg, and
+especially Vicksburg, was won; for, said he: "The signs look better.
+The Father of Waters again goes unvexed to the Sea".</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [This admirable letter, reviewing "the situation" and his policy,
+ was in these words</p>
+
+<p> EXECUTIVE MANSION,<br>
+ WASHINGTON, August 26. 1863.</p>
+
+<p> HON. JAMES C. CONKLING</p>
+
+<p> MY DEAR SIR; Your letter inviting me to attend a Mass Meeting of
+ unconditional Union men to be held at the Capital of Illinois, on
+ the 3rd day of September, has been received. It would be very
+ agreeable for me thus to meet my old friends at my own home; but I
+ cannot just now be absent from here so long a time as a visit there
+ would require.</p>
+
+<p> The meeting is to be of all those who maintain unconditional
+ devotion to the Union; and I am sure that my old political friends
+ will thank me for tendering, as I do, the Nation's gratitude to
+ those other noble men whom no partisan malice or partisan hope can
+ make false to the Nation's life.</p>
+
+<p> There are those who are dissatisfied with me. To such I would say:
+ you desire Peace, and you blame me that we do not have it. But how
+ can we attain it? There are but three conceivable ways: First, to
+ suppress the Rebellion by force of Arms. This I am trying to do.
+ Are you for it? If you are, so far we are agreed. If you are not
+ for it, a second way is to give up the Union. I am against this.
+ Are you for it? If you are, you should say so plainly. If you are
+ not for Force, nor yet for Dissolution, there only remains some
+ imaginable Compromise.</p>
+
+<p> I do not believe that any Compromise embracing the maintenance of
+ the Union is now possible. All that I learn leads to a directly
+ opposite belief. The strength of the Rebellion is its Military,
+ its Army. That Army dominates all the Country, and all the people,
+ within its range. Any offer of terms made by any man or men within
+ that range, in opposition to that Army, is simply nothing for the
+ present: because such man or men have no power whatever to enforce
+ their side of a Compromise, if one were made with them.</p>
+
+<p> To illustrate: Suppose refugees from the South, and Peace men of
+ the North, get together in Convention, and frame and proclaim a
+ Compromise embracing a restoration of the Union. In what way can
+ that Compromise be used to keep Lee's Army out of Pennsylvania?
+ Meade's Army can keep Lee's Army out of Pennsylvania, and, I think,
+ can ultimately drive it out of existence. But no paper Compromise
+ to which the controllers of Lee's Army are not agreed, can at all
+ affect that Army. In an effort at such Compromise we would waste
+ time, which the Enemy would improve to our disadvantage; and that
+ would be all.</p>
+
+<p> A Compromise, to be effective, must be made either with those who
+ control the Rebel Army, or with the people, first liberated from
+ the domination of that Army, by the success of our own Army. Now,
+ allow me to assure you that no word or intimation from that Rebel
+ Army, or from any of the men controlling it, in relation to any
+ Peace Compromise, has ever come to my knowledge or belief. All
+ charges and insinuations to the contrary are deceptive and
+ groundless. And I promise you that if any such proposition shall
+ hereafter come, it shall not be rejected and kept a secret from
+ you. I freely acknowledge myself to be the servant of the People,
+ according to the bond of service, the United States Constitution;
+ and that, as such, I am responsible to them.</p>
+
+<p> But, to be plain. You are dissatisfied with me about the Negro.
+ Quite likely there is a difference of opinion between you and
+ myself upon that subject. I certainly wish that all men could be
+ Free, while you, I suppose, do not. Yet I have neither adopted nor
+ proposed any measure which is not consistent with even your view,
+ provided that you are for the Union. I suggested compensated
+ Emancipation; to which you replied you wished not to be taxed to
+ buy Negroes. But I had not asked you to be taxed to buy Negroes,
+ except in such a way as to save you from greater taxation to save
+ the Union, exclusively by other means.</p>
+
+<p> You dislike the Emancipation Proclamation, and perhaps would have
+ it retracted. You say it is Unconstitutional. I think
+ differently. I think the Constitution invests the
+ Commander-in-Chief with the Law of War in Time of War. The most that can be
+ said, if so much, is, that Slaves are property. Is there, has
+ there ever been, any question that, by the Law of War, property,
+ both of enemies and friends, may be taken when needed? And is it
+ not needed whenever it helps us and hurts the Enemy? Armies, the
+ World over, destroy enemies' property when they cannot use it; and
+ even destroy their own to keep it from the Enemy. Civilized
+ belligerents do all in their power to help themselves or hurt the
+ Enemy, except a few things regarded as barbarous or cruel. Among
+ the exceptions are the massacre of vanquished foes and
+ non-combatants, male and female.</p>
+
+<p> But the Proclamation, as law, either is valid or is not valid. If
+ it is not valid, it needs no retraction. If it is valid it cannot
+ be retracted, any more than the dead can be brought to life. Some
+ of you profess to think its retraction would operate favorably for
+ the Union. Why better after the retraction than before the issue?
+ There was more than a year and a half of trial to suppress the
+ Rebellion before the Proclamation was issued, the last one hundred
+ days of which passed under an explicit notice that it was coming,
+ unless averted by those in revolt returning to their allegiance.
+ The War has certainly progressed as favorably for us since the
+ issue of the Proclamation as before.</p>
+
+<p> I know as fully as one can know the opinions of others that some of
+ the Commanders of our Armies in the field, who have given us our
+ most important victories, believe the Emancipation policy and the
+ use of Colored troops constitute the heaviest blows yet dealt to
+ the Rebellion, and that at least one of those important successes
+ could not have been achieved when it was, but for the aid of Black
+ soldiers.</p>
+
+<p> Among the Commanders who hold these views are some who have never
+ had an affinity with what is called "Abolitionism," or with
+ "Republican party politics," but who hold them purely as Military
+ opinions. I submit their opinions as entitled to some weight
+ against the objections often urged that Emancipation and arming the
+ Blacks are unwise as Military measures, and were not adopted as
+ such, in good faith.</p>
+
+<p> You say that you will not fight to Free Negroes. Some of them seem
+ willing to fight for you; but no matter. Fight you, then,
+ exclusively to save the Union. I issued the Proclamation on
+ purpose to aid you in saving the Union. Whenever you shall have
+ conquered all resistance to the Union, if I shall urge you to
+ continue fighting, it will be an apt time then for you to declare
+ you will not fight to Free Negroes. I thought that in your
+ struggle for the Union, to whatever extent the Negroes should cease
+ helping the Enemy, to that extent it weakened the Enemy in his
+ resistance to you. Do you think differently? I thought whatever
+ Negroes can be got to do as soldiers, leaves just so much less for
+ White soldiers to do in saving the Union. Does it appear otherwise
+ to you? But Negroes, like other people, act upon motives. Why
+ should they do anything for us if we will do nothing for them? If
+ they stake their lives for us they must be prompted by the
+ strongest motives, even the promise of Freedom. And the promise,
+ being made, must be kept.</p>
+
+<p> The signs look better. The Father of Waters again goes unvexed to
+ the Sea. Thanks to the great Northwest for it; nor yet wholly to
+ them. Three hundred miles up, they met New England, Empire,
+ Keystone, and Jersey, hewing their way right and left. The Sunny
+ South, too, in more colors than one, also lent a helping hand. On
+ the spot, their part of the history was jotted down in Black and
+ White. The job was a great National one, and let none be slighted
+ who bore an honorable part in it. And while those who have cleared
+ the Great River may well be proud, even that is not all. It is
+ hard to say that anything has been more bravely and well done than
+ at Antietam, Murfreesboro, Gettysburg, and on many fields of less
+ note. Nor must Uncle Sam's web-feet be forgotten. At all the
+ watery margins they have been present, not only on the deep Sea,
+ the broad Bay, and the rapid River, but also up the narrow, muddy
+ Bayou, and wherever the ground was a little damp they had been, and
+ made their tracks. Thanks to all. For the Great Republic&mdash;for the
+ principle it lives by, and keeps alive&mdash;for Man's vast
+ future&mdash;thanks to all.</p>
+
+<p> Peace does not appear so distant as it did. I hope it will come
+ soon, and come to stay; and so come as to be worth the keeping in
+ all future time. It will then have been proved that among Freemen
+ there can be no successful appeal from the ballot to the bullet,
+ and that they who take such appeal are sure to lose their case and
+ pay the cost. And there will be some Black men who can remember
+ that, with silent tongue, and clinched teeth, and steady eye, and
+ well poised bayonet, they have helped mankind on to this great
+ consummation, while I fear there will be some White ones unable to
+ forget that with malignant heart and deceitful speech they have
+ striven to hinder it.</p>
+
+<p> Still, let us not be over sanguine of a speedy, final triumph. Let
+ us be quite sober. Let us diligently apply the means, never
+ doubting that a just God, in his own good time, will give us the
+ rightful result.</p>
+
+<p> Yours very truly,<br>
+ A. LINCOLN.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<br><br>
+<p>
+But Chattanooga, and the grand majorities in all the Fall
+State-elections, save that of New Jersey,&mdash;and especially the manner in which
+loyal Ohio sat down upon the chief Copperhead-Democrat and
+Treason-breeder of the North, Vallandigham&mdash;came most auspiciously to strengthen
+the President's hands.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [The head of the Knights of the Golden Circle, and the Democratic
+ candidate for Governor of Ohio]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>And now he saw, more clearly still, the approach of that time when the
+solemn promise and declaration of Emancipation might be recorded upon
+the sacred roll of the Constitution, and thus be made safe for all time.</p>
+
+<p>In his Annual Message of December, 1863, therefore, President Lincoln,
+after adverting to the fact that "a year ago the War had already lasted
+nearly twenty months," without much ground for hopefulness, proceeded to
+say:</p>
+
+<p>"The preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, issued in September, was
+running its assigned period to the beginning of the New Year. A month
+later the final Proclamation came, including the announcement that
+Colored men of suitable condition would be received into the War
+service. The policy of Emancipation, and of employing Black soldiers,
+gave to the future a new aspect, about which hope, and fear, and doubt,
+contended in uncertain conflict.</p>
+
+<p>"According to our political system, as a matter of Civil Administration,
+the General Government had no lawful power to effect Emancipation in any
+State, and for a long time it had been hoped that the Rebellion could be
+suppressed without resorting to it as a Military measure. It was all
+the while deemed possible that the necessity for it might come, and that
+if it should, the crisis of the contest would then be presented. It
+came, and, as was anticipated, it was followed by dark and doubtful
+days.</p>
+
+<p>"Eleven months having now passed, we are permitted to take another view
+* * * Of those who were Slaves at the beginning of the Rebellion, full
+one hundred thousand are now in the United States Military service,
+about one half of which number actually bear arms in the ranks; thus
+giving the double advantage of taking so much labor from the Insurgent
+cause, and supplying the places which otherwise must be filled with so
+many White men. So far as tested, it is difficult to say they are not
+as good soldiers as any.</p>
+
+<p>"No servile insurrection, or tendency to violence or cruelty, has marked
+the measures of Emancipation and arming the Blacks. These measures have
+been much discussed in Foreign Countries, and contemporary with such
+discussion the tone of public sentiment there is much improved. At
+home, the same measures have been fully discussed, supported,
+criticised, and denounced, and the annual elections following are highly
+encouraging to those whose official duty it is to bear the Country
+through this great trial. Thus we have the new reckoning. The crisis
+which threatened to divide the friends of the Union is past."</p>
+
+<p>After alluding to his Proclamation of Amnesty, issued simultaneously
+with this Message, to all repentant Rebels who would take an oath
+therein prescribed, and contending that such an oath should be (as he
+had drawn it) to uphold not alone the Constitution and the Union, but
+the Laws and Proclamations touching Slavery as well, President Lincoln
+continued:</p>
+
+<p>"In my judgment they have aided and will further aid, the Cause for
+which they were intended. To now abandon them, would be not only to
+relinquish a lever of power, but would also be a cruel and an astounding
+breach of faith." And, toward the close of the Message, he added:</p>
+
+<p>"The movements by State action, for Emancipation, in several of the
+States not included in the Emancipation Proclamation, are matters of
+profound gratulation. And while I do not repeat in detail what I have
+heretofore so earnestly urged upon the subject, my general views remain
+unchanged; and I trust that Congress will omit no fair opportunity of
+AIDING THESE IMPORTANT STEPS TO A GREAT CONSUMMATION."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Lincoln's patient but persistent solicitude, his earnest and
+unintermitted efforts&mdash;exercised publicly through his Messages and
+speeches, and privately upon Members of Congress who called upon, or
+whose presence was requested by him at the White House&mdash;in behalf of
+incorporating Emancipation in the Constitution, were now to give
+promise, at least, of bearing good fruit.</p>
+
+<p>Measures looking to this end were submitted in both Houses of Congress
+soon after its meeting, and were referred to the respective Judiciary
+Committees of the same, and on the 10th of February, 1864, Mr. Trumbull
+reported to the Senate, from the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which he
+was Chairman, a substitute Joint Resolution providing for the submission
+to the States of an Amendment to the United States Constitution in the
+following words:</p>
+
+<p>"ART. XIII., SEC. I. Neither Slavery nor Involuntary Servitude, except
+as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly
+convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to
+their jurisdiction.</p>
+
+<p>"SEC. II. Congress shall have power to enforce this Article by
+appropriate legislation."</p>
+
+<p>This proposed Amendment came up for consideration in the Senate, on the
+28th of March, and a notable debate ensued.</p>
+
+<p>On the same day, in the House of Representatives, Thaddeus Stevens&mdash;with
+the object perhaps of ascertaining the strength, in that Body, of the
+friends of out-and-out Emancipation&mdash;offered a Resolution proposing to
+the States the following Amendments to the United States Constitution:</p>
+
+<p>"ART. I. Slavery and Involuntary Servitude, except for the punishment
+of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, is forever
+prohibited in the United States and all its Territories.</p>
+
+<p>"ART. II. So much of Article four, Section two, as refers to the
+delivery up of Persons held to Service or Labor, escaping into another
+State, is annulled."</p>
+
+<p>The test was made upon a motion to table the Resolution, which motion
+was defeated by 38 yeas to 69 nays, and showed the necessity for
+converting three members from the Opposition. Subsequently, at the
+instance of Mr. Stevens himself, the second Article of the Resolution
+was struck out by 72 yeas to 26 nays.</p>
+
+<p>The proceedings in both Houses of Congress upon these propositions to
+engraft upon the National Constitution a provision guaranteeing Freedom
+to all men upon our soil, were now interrupted by the death of one who
+would almost have been willing to die twice over, if, by doing so, he
+could have hastened their adoption.</p>
+
+<p>Owen Lovejoy, the life-long apostle of Abolitionism, the fervid
+gospeller of Emancipation, was dead; and it seemed almost the irony of
+Fate that, at such a time, when Emancipation most needed all its friends
+to make it secure, its doughtiest champion should fall.</p>
+
+<p>But perhaps the eloquent tributes paid to his memory, in the Halls of
+Congress, helped the Cause no less. They at least brought back to the
+public mind the old and abhorrent tyrannies of the Southern Slave power;
+how it had sought not not only to destroy freedom of Action, but freedom
+of Speech, and hesitated not to destroy human Life with these; reminded
+the Loyal People of the Union of much that was hateful, from which they
+had escaped; and strengthened the purpose of Patriots to fix in the
+chief corner-stone of the Constitution, imperishable muniments of human
+Liberty.</p>
+
+<p>Lovejoy's brother had been murdered at Alton, Illinois, while
+vindicating freedom of Speech and of the Press; and the blood of that
+martyr truly became "the seed of the Church." Arnold&mdash;recalling a
+speech of Owen Lovejoy's at Chicago, and a passage in it, descriptive of
+the martyrdom,&mdash;said to the House, on this sad occasion: "I remember
+that, after describing the scene of that death, in words&mdash;which stirred
+every heart, he said he went a pilgrim to his brother's grave, and,
+kneeling upon the sod beneath which sleeps that brother, he swore, by
+the everlasting God, eternal hostility to African Slavery." And,
+continued Arnold, "Well and nobly has he kept that oath."</p>
+
+<p>Washburne, too, reminded the House of the memorable episode in that very
+Hall when, (April 5, 1860), the adherents of Slavery crowding around
+Lovejoy with fierce imprecations and threats, seeking then and there to
+prevent Free Speech, "he displayed that undaunted courage and matchless
+bearing which extorted the admiration of even his most deadly foes."
+"His"&mdash;continued the same speaker&mdash;"was the eloquence of Mirabeau, which
+in the Tiers Etat and in the National Assembly made to totter the throne
+of France; it was the eloquence of Danton, who made all France to
+tremble from his tempestuous utterances in the National Convention.
+Like those apostles of the French Revolution, his eloquence could stir
+from the lowest depths all the passions of Man; but unlike them, he was
+as good and as pure as he was eloquent and brave, a noble minded
+Christian man, a lover of the whole human Race, and of universal Liberty
+regulated by Law."</p>
+
+<p>Grinnell, in his turn, told also with real pathos, of his having
+recently seen Lovejoy in the chamber of sickness. "When," said
+Grinnell, "I expressed fears for his recovery, I saw the tears course
+down his manly cheek, as he said 'Ah! God's will be done, but I have
+been laboring, voting, and praying for twenty years that I might see the
+great day of Freedom which is so near and which I hope God will let me
+live to rejoice in. I want a vote on my Bill for the destruction of
+Slavery, root and branch.'"</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p>
+ [Sumner, afterward speaking of Lovejoy and this Measure, said: "On
+ the 14th of December, 1863, he introduced a Bill, whose title
+ discloses its character: 'A Bill to give effect to the Declaration
+ of Independence, and also to certain Provisions of the Constitution
+ of the United States.' It proceeds to recite that All Men were
+ Created Equal, and were Endowed by the Creator with the Inalienable
+ Right to Life, Liberty and the Fruits of honest Toil; that the
+ Government of the United States was Instituted to Secure those
+ Rights; that the Constitution declares that No Person shall be
+ Deprived of Liberty without due Process of Law, and also
+ provides&mdash;article five, clause two&mdash;that this Constitution, and the Laws of
+ the United States made in pursuance thereof, shall be the Supreme
+ Law of the Land, and the Judges in each State shall be bound
+ thereby, anything in the Constitution and Laws of any State to the
+ contrary notwithstanding; that it is now demonstrated by the
+ Rebellion that Slavery is absolutely incompatible with the Union,
+ Peace, and General Welfare for which Congress is to Provide; and it
+ therefore Enacts that All Persons heretofore held in Slavery in any
+ of the States or Territories of the United States are declared
+ Freedmen, and are Forever Released from Slavery or Involuntary
+ Servitude except as Punishment for Crime on due conviction. On the
+ same day he introduced another Bill to Protect Freedmen and to
+ Punish any one for Enslaving them. These were among his last
+ Public acts,"&mdash;Cong. Globe, 1st S., 38th C., Pt. 2, p. 1334]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>And staunch old Thaddeus Stevens said: "The change to him, is great
+gain. The only regret we can feel is that he did not live to see the
+salvation of his Country; to see Peace and Union restored, and universal
+Emancipation given to his native land. But such are the ways of
+Providence. Moses was not permitted to enter the Promised Land with
+those he had led out of Bondage; he beheld it from afar off, and slept
+with his fathers." "The deceased," he impressively added, "needs no
+perishable monuments of brass or marble to perpetuate his name. So long
+as the English language shall be spoken or deciphered, so long as
+Liberty shall have a worshipper, his name will be known!"</p>
+
+<p>What influence the death of Owen Lovejoy may have had on the subsequent
+proceedings touching Emancipation interrupted as we have seen by his
+demise&mdash;cannot be known; but among all the eloquent tributes to his
+memory called forth by the mournful incident, perhaps none, could he
+have heard it, would have better pleased him than those two opening
+sentences of Charles Summer's oration in the Senate&mdash;where he said of
+Owen Lovejoy: "Could his wishes prevail, he would prefer much that
+Senators should continue in their seats and help to enact into Law some
+one of the several Measures now pending to secure the obliteration of
+Slavery. Such an Act would be more acceptable to him than any personal
+tribute,&mdash;" unless it might be these other words, which followed from
+the same lips: "How his enfranchised Soul would be elevated even in
+those Abodes to which he has been removed, to know that his voice was
+still heard on Earth encouraging, exhorting, insisting that there should
+be no hesitation anywhere in striking at Slavery; that this unpardonable
+wrong, from which alone the Rebellion draws its wicked life, must be
+blasted by Presidential proclamation, blasted by Act of Congress,
+blasted by Constitutional prohibition, blasted in every possible way, by
+every available agency, and at every occurring opportunity, so that no
+trace of the outrage may continue in the institutions of the Land, and
+especially that its accursed foot-prints may no longer defile the
+National Statute-book. Sir, it will be in vain that you pass
+Resolutions in tribute to him, if you neglect that Cause for which he
+lived, and do not hearken to his voice!"</p>
+
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+<a name="trumbell"></a>
+<center>
+<img alt="p528-trumbell.jpg (65K)" src="images/p528-trumbell.jpg" height="827" width="584">
+</center>
+<br><br><br>
+<a name="ch23"></a>
+<br><br>
+<center>
+<h2>
+ CHAPTER XXIII.<br><br>
+
+ "THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT" IN THE SENATE.
+
+</h2>
+</center>
+<br>
+<p>During the great debate, which now opened in the Senate, upon the
+Judiciary Committee's substitute resolution for the Amendment of the
+Constitution, so as forever to prohibit Slavery within the United
+States, and to empower Congress to pass such laws as would make that
+prohibition effective&mdash;participated in by Messrs. Trumbull, Wilson,
+Saulsbury, Davis, Harlan, Powell, Sherman, Clark, Hale, Hendricks,
+Henderson, Sumner, McDougall and others&mdash;the whole history of Slavery
+was enquired into and laid bare.</p>
+
+<p>Trumbull insisted that Slavery was at the bottom of all the internal
+troubles with which the Nation had from its birth been afflicted, down
+to this wicked Rebellion, with all the resulting "distress, desolation,
+and death;" and that by 1860, it had grown to such power and arrogance
+that "its advocates demanded the control of the Nation in
+its interests, failing in which, they attempted its overthrow." He
+reviewed, at some length, what had been done by our Government with
+regard to Slavery, since the breaking out of hostilities against us in
+that mad attempt against the National life; how, "in the earlier stages
+of the War, there was an indisposition on the part of the Executive
+Authority to interfere with Slavery at all;" how, for a long time,
+Slaves, escaping to our lines, were driven back to their Rebel masters;
+how the Act of Congress of July, 1861, which gave Freedom to all Slaves
+allowed by their Rebel masters to assist in the erection of Rebel works
+and fortifications, had "not been executed," and, said Mr. Trumbull, "so
+far as I am advised, not a single Slave has been set at liberty under
+it;" how, "it was more than a year after its enactment before any
+considerable number of Persons of African descent were organized and
+armed" under the subsequent law of December, 1861, which not only gave
+Freedom to all Slaves entering our Military lines, or who, belonging to
+Rebel masters, were deserted by them, or were found in regions once
+occupied by Rebel forces and later by those of the Union, but also
+empowered the President to organize and arm them to aid in the
+suppression of the Rebellion; how, it was not until this law had been
+enacted that Union officers ceased to expel Slaves coming within our
+lines&mdash;and then only when dismissal from the public service was made the
+penalty for such expulsion; how, by his Proclamations of Emancipation,
+of September, 1862, and January, 1863, the President undertook to
+supplement Congressional action&mdash;which had, theretofore, been confined
+to freeing the Slaves of Rebels, and of such of these only as had come
+within the lines of our Military power-by also declaring, Free, the
+Slaves "who were in regions of country from which the authority of the
+United States was expelled;" and how, the "force and effect" of these
+Proclamations were variously understood by the enemies and friends of
+those measures&mdash;it being insisted on the one side that Emancipation as a
+War-stroke was within the Constitutional War-power of the President as
+Commander-in-Chief, and that, by virtue of those Proclamations, "all
+Slaves within the localities designated become ipso facto Free," and on
+the other, that the Proclamations were "issued without competent
+authority," and had not effected and could not effect, "the Emancipation
+of a single Slave," nor indeed could at any time, without additional
+legislation, go farther than to liberate Slaves coming within the Union
+Army lines.</p>
+
+<p>After demonstrating that "any and all these laws and Proclamations,
+giving to each the largest effect claimed by its friends, are
+ineffectual to the destruction of Slavery," and protesting that some
+more effectual method of getting rid of that Institution must be
+adopted, he declared, as his judgment, that "the only effectual way of
+ridding the Country of Slavery, so that it cannot be resuscitated, is by
+an Amendment of the Constitution forever prohibiting it within the
+jurisdiction of the United States."</p>
+
+<p>He then canvassed the chances of adoption of such an Amendment by an
+affirmative vote of two thirds in each House of Congress, and of its
+subsequent ratification by three-fourths of the States of the Union, and
+declared that "it is reasonable to suppose that if this proposed
+Amendment passes Congress, it will, within a year, receive the
+ratification of the requisite number of States to make it a part of the
+Constitution." His prediction proved correct&mdash;but only after a
+protracted struggle.</p>
+
+<p>Henry Wilson also made a strong speech, but on different grounds. He
+held that the Emancipation Proclamations formed, together, a "complete,
+absolute, and final decree of Emancipation in Rebel States," and, being
+"born of Military necessity" and "proclaimed by the Commander-in-Chief
+of the Army and Navy, is the settled and irrepealable Law of the
+Republic, to be observed, obeyed, and enforced, by Army and Navy, and is
+the irreversible voice of the Nation."</p>
+
+<p>He also reviewed what had been done since the outbreak of the Rebellion,
+by Congress and the President, by Laws and Proclamations; and, while
+standing by the Emancipation Proclamations, declared that "the crowning
+Act, in this series of Acts, for the restriction and extinction of
+Slavery in America, is this proposed Amendment to the Constitution
+prohibiting the existence of Slavery in the Republic of the United
+States."</p>
+
+<p>The Emancipation Proclamation, according to his view, only needed
+enforcement, to give "Peace and Order, Freedom and Unity, to a now
+distracted Country;" but the "crowning act" of incorporating this
+Amendment into the Constitution would do even more than all this, in
+that it would "obliterate the last lingering vestiges of the Slave
+System; its chattelizing, degrading, and bloody codes; its malignant,
+barbarizing spirit; all it was, and is; everything connected with it or
+pertaining to it, from the face of the Nation it has scarred with moral
+desolation, from the bosom of the Country it has reddened with the blood
+and strewn with the graves of patriotism."</p>
+
+<p>While the debate proceeded, President Lincoln watched it with careful
+interest. Other matters, however, had, since the Battle of Chattanooga,
+largely engrossed his attention.</p>
+
+<p>The right man had at last been found&mdash;it was believed&mdash;to control as
+well as to lead our Armies. That man was Ulysses S. Grant. The grade
+of Lieutenant General of the Army of the United States&mdash;in desuetude
+since the days of Washington, except by brevet, in the case of Winfield
+Scott,&mdash;having been especially revived by Congress for and filled by the
+appointment and confirmation of Grant, March 2, 1864, that great soldier
+immediately came on to Washington, received his commission at the hands
+of President Lincoln, in the cabinet chamber of the White House, on the
+9th, paid a flying visit to the Army of the Potomac, on the 10th, and at
+once returned to Nashville to plan future movements.</p>
+
+<p>On the 12th, a General Order of the War Department (No. 98) was issued,
+relieving Major-General Halleck, "at his own request," from duty as
+"General-in-Chief" of the Army, and assigning Lieutenant-General U. S.
+Grant to "the command of the Armies of the United States," "the
+Headquarters of the Army" to be in Washington, and also with
+Lieutenant-General Grant in the Field, Halleck being assigned to "duty, in
+Washington, as Chief-of-staff of the Army, under the direction of the
+Secretary of War and the Lieutenant-General commanding."</p>
+
+<p>By the same order, Sherman was assigned to the command of the "Military
+Division of the Mississippi," composed of the Departments of the Ohio,
+the Cumberland, the Tennessee, and the Arkansas; and McPherson to that
+of the Department and Army of the Tennessee.</p>
+
+<p>On the 23rd of March, Grant was back again at Washington, and at once
+proceeded to Culpepper Court-house, Virginia, where his Headquarters in
+the field were, for a time, to be.</p>
+
+<p>Here he completed his plans, and reorganized his Forces, for the coming
+conflicts, in the South-west and South-east, which were to result in a
+full triumph to the Union Arms, and Peace to a preserved Union.</p>
+
+<p>It is evident, from the utterances of Mr. Lincoln when Vicksburg fell,
+that he had then become pretty well satisfied that Grant was "the coming
+man," to whom it would be safe to confide the management and chief
+leadership of our Armies. Chattanooga merely confirmed that belief&mdash;as
+indeed it did that of Union men generally. But the concurrent judgment
+of Congress and the President had now, as we have seen, placed Grant in
+that chief command; and the consequent relief to Mr. Lincoln, in thus
+having the heavy responsibility of Army-control, long unwillingly
+exercised by him, taken from his own shoulders and placed upon those of
+the one great soldier in whom he had learned to have implicit faith,&mdash;a
+faith earned by steady and unvaryingly successful achievements in the
+Field&mdash;must have been most grateful.</p>
+
+<p>Other responsibilities would still press heavily enough upon the
+President's time and attention. Questions touching the Military and
+Civil government of regions of the Enemy's country, conquered by the
+Union arms; of the rehabilitation or reconstruction of the Rebel States;
+of a thousand and one other matters, of greater or lesser perplexity,
+growing out of these and other questions; besides the ever pressing and
+gigantic problems involved in the raising of enormous levies of troops,
+and prodigious sums of money, needed in securing, moving, and supplying
+them, and defraying the extraordinary expenses growing out of the
+necessary blockade of thousands of miles of Southern Coast, and other
+Naval movements; not to speak of those expenditures belonging to the
+more ordinary business transactions of the Government.</p>
+
+<p>But chief of all things claiming his especial solicitude, as we have
+seen, was this question of Emancipation by Constitutional enactment, the
+debate upon which was now proceeding in the Senate. That solicitude was
+necessarily increased by the bitter opposition to it of Northern
+Copperheads, and by the attitude of the Border-State men, upon whose
+final action, the triumph or defeat of this great measure must
+ultimately depend.</p>
+
+<p>Many of the latter, were, as has already been shown in these pages,
+loyal men; but the loyalty of some of these to their Country, was still
+so questionably and so thoroughly tainted with their worshipful devotion
+to Slavery&mdash;although they must have been blind indeed not to have
+discovered, long ere this, that it was a "slowly-dying cause"&mdash;that they
+were ever on the alert to delay, hamper, and defeat, any action, whether
+Executive or Legislative, and however necessary for the preservation of
+the Union and the overthrow of its mortal enemies, which, never so
+lightly, impinged upon their "sacred Institution."</p>
+
+<p>This fact was well set forth, in this very debate, by a Senator from New
+England&mdash;[Wilson of Massachusetts]&mdash;when, after adjuring the
+anti-Slavery men of the age, not to forget the long list of Slavery's crimes,
+he eloquently proceeded:</p>
+
+<p>"Let them remember, too, that hundreds of thousands of our countrymen in
+Loyal States&mdash;since Slavery raised the banners of Insurrection, and sent
+death, wounds, sickness, and sorrow, into the homes of the People&mdash;have
+resisted, and still continue to resist, any measure for the defense of
+the Nation, if that measure tended to impair the vital and animating
+powers of Slavery. They resisted the Act making Free the Slaves used by
+Rebels for Military purposes; the Confiscation of Rebel property and the
+Freedom of the Slaves of Rebel masters; the Abolition of Slavery in the
+Capital of the Nation, and the consecration of the Territories to Free
+Labor and Free laboring men; the Proclamation of Emancipation; the
+enlistment of Colored men to fight the battles of the Country; the
+Freedom of the Black soldier, who is fighting, bleeding, dying for the
+Country; and the Freedom of his wife and children. And now, when War
+has for nearly three years menaced the life of the Nation, bathed the
+Land in blood, and filled two hundred thousand graves with our slain
+sons, these men of the Loyal States still cling to the falling fortunes
+of the relentless and unappeasable Enemy of their Country and its
+democratic institutions; they mourn, and will not be comforted, over the
+expiring System, in the Border Slave-States; and, in tones of
+indignation or of anguish, they utter lamentations over the Proclamation
+of Emancipation, and the policy that is bringing Rebel States back again
+radiant with Freedom."</p>
+
+<p>Among these "loyal" Democratic opponents of Emancipation, in any shape,
+or any where, were not wanting men&mdash;whether from Loyal Northern or
+Border States&mdash;who still openly avowed that Slavery was right; that
+Rebellion, to preserve its continuance, was justifiable; and that there
+was no Constitutional method of uprooting it.</p>
+
+<p>Saulsbury of Delaware, was representative and spokesman of this class,
+and he took occasion during this very debate&mdash;[In the Senate, March 31,
+1864.]&mdash;to defend Slavery as a Divine Institution, which had the
+sanction both of the Mosaic and Christian Dispensations!</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [Said he: "Slavery had existed under some form or other from the
+ first period of recorded history. It dates back even beyond the
+ period of Abraham, the Father of the Faithful, in whose seed all
+ the Nations of the Earth were to be blessed. We find that,
+ immediately after the Flood, the Almighty, for purposes inscrutable
+ to us, condemned a whole race to Servitude: 'Vayomer Orur Knoan
+ Efet Afoatim Yeahio Le-echot:' 'And he said, Cursed be Canaan;
+ Slave of Slaves he shall be to his brethren.' It continued among
+ all people until the advent of the Christian era. It was
+ recognized in that New Dispensation, which was to supersede the
+ Old. It has the sanction of God's own Apostle; for when Paul sent
+ back Onesimus to Philemon, whom did he send? A Freeman? No, Sir.
+ He sent his (doulos,) a Slave, born as such, not even his
+ andrapodon, who was such by captivity in War. Among all people,
+ and in all ages, has this Institution, if such it is to be called,
+ existed, and had the countenance of wise and good men, and even of
+ the Christian Church itself, until these modern times, up at least
+ to the Nineteenth Century. It exists in this Country, and has
+ existed from the beginning."</p>
+
+<p> Mr. Harlan's reply to the position of Mr. Saulsbury that Slavery is
+ right, is a Divine Institution, etc., was very able and
+ interesting. He piled up authority after authority, English as
+ well as American, to show that there is no support of Slavery&mdash;and
+ especially of the title to services of the adult offspring of a
+ Slave&mdash;at Common Law; and, after also proving, by the mouth of a
+ favorite son of Virginia, that it has no legal existence by virtue
+ of any Municipal or Statutory Law, he declared that the only
+ remaining Law that can be cited for its support is the Levitical
+ Code"&mdash;as follows:</p>
+
+<p> "'Both thy Bondmen, and thy Bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall
+ be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy
+ Bondmen and Bondmaids.</p>
+
+<p> "'Moreover, of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among
+ you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you,
+ which they begat in your land; and they shall be your possession.</p>
+
+<p> "'And ye shall take them as an Inheritance for your children after
+ you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your Bondmen
+ forever."'</p>
+
+<p> "I remark," said he, "in this connection, that the Levitical Code,
+ or the Hebrew Law, contains a provision for the Naturalization of
+ Foreigners, whether captives of War, or voluntary emigrants. By
+ compliance with the requirements of this law they became citizens,
+ entitled to all the rights and privileges and immunities of native
+ Hebrews. The Hebrew Slave Code, applicable to Enslaved Hebrews, is
+ in these words:</p>
+
+<p> "'And if thy brother, an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew woman, be sold
+ unto thee, and serve thee six years, then in the seventh year thou
+ shalt let him go Free from thee.'</p>
+
+<p> "Here I request the attention of those who claim compensation for
+ Emancipated Slaves to the text:</p>
+
+<p> "'And when thou sendest him out Free from thee, thou shalt not let
+ him go away empty:</p>
+
+<p> "'Thou shalt furnish him liberally out of thy floor'&mdash;</p>
+
+<p> "Which means granaries&mdash;</p>
+
+<p> "'and out of thy wine-press: of that wherewith the Lord thy God
+ hath blessed thee, thou shalt give unto him.'</p>
+
+<p> "'It shall not seem hard unto thee, when thou sendest him away Free
+ from thee, for he hath been worth a double-hired servant to thee,
+ in serving thee six years.'</p>
+
+<p> "These Hebrew Statutes provide that the heathen might be purchased
+ and held as Slaves, and their posterity after them; that under
+ their Naturalization Laws all strangers and sojourners, Bond and
+ Free, have the privilege of acquiring the rights of citizenship;
+ that all Hebrews, natives or naturalized, might assert and maintain
+ their right to Freedom.</p>
+
+<p> "At the end of six years a Hebrew Slave thus demanding his Liberty,
+ was not to be sent away empty; the owner, so far from claiming
+ compensation from his neighbors or from the Public Treasury for
+ setting him Free, was bound to divide with the Freedman, of his own
+ possessions: to give him of his flocks, of his herds, of his
+ granary, and of his winepress, of everything with which the Lord
+ Almighty had blessed the master during the years of his Servitude;
+ and then the owner was admonished that he was not to regard it as a
+ hardship to be required to Liberate the Slave, and to divide with
+ him of his substance.</p>
+
+<p> "The Almighty places the Liberated Slave's claim to a division of
+ his former master's property on the eternal principles of Justice,
+ the duty to render an equivalent for an equivalent. The Slave
+ having served six years must be paid for his Service, must be paid
+ liberally because he had been worth even more than a hired servant
+ during the period of his enslavement.</p>
+
+<p> "If, then," continued Mr. Harlan, "the justice of this claim cannot
+ be found either in Reason, Natural Justice, or the principles of
+ the Common Law, or in any positive Municipal or Statute regulation
+ of any State, or in the Hebrew Code written by the Finger of God
+ protruded from the flame of fire on the summit of Sinai, I ask
+ whence the origin of the title to the services of the adult
+ offspring of the Slave mother? or is it not manifest that there is
+ no just title? Is it not a mere usurpation without any known mode
+ of justification, under any existing Code of Laws, human or
+ Divine?"]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>He also undertook to justify Secession on the singular ground that "we
+are sprung from a Race of Secessionists," the proof of which he held to
+be in the fact that, while the preamble to, as well as the body of the
+Convention of Ratification of, the old Articles of Confederation between
+the States of New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and
+Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
+Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and
+Georgia, declared that Confederation to be a "Perpetual Union," yet,
+within nine years thereafter, all the other States Seceded from New
+York, Virginia, North Carolina, and Rhode Island by ratifying the new
+Constitution for "a more perfect Union."</p>
+
+<p>He also endeavored to maintain the extraordinary proposition that "if
+the Senate of the United States were to adopt this Joint-resolution, and
+were to submit it to all the States of this Union, and if three-fourths
+of the States should ratify the Amendment, it would not be binding on
+any State whose interest was affected by it, if that State protested
+against it!" And beyond all this, he re-echoed the old, old cry of the
+Border-state men, that "the time is unpropitious for such a measure as
+this."</p>
+
+<p>Reverdy Johnson, of Maryland, however, by his great speech, of April
+5th, in the Senate, did much to clear the tangle in the minds of some
+faltering Union statesmen on this important subject.</p>
+
+<p>He reviewed the question of human Slavery from the time when the
+Constitutional Convention was held; showed that at that period, as well
+as at the time of the Declaration of our Independence "there was but one
+sentiment upon the subject among enlightened Southern statesmen"&mdash;and
+that was, that Slavery "is a great affliction to any Country where it
+prevails;" and declared that "a prosperous and permanent Peace can never
+be secured if the Institution is permitted to survive."</p>
+
+<p>He then traversed the various methods by which statesmen were seeking to
+prevent that survival of Slavery, addressing himself by turns to the
+arguments of those who, with John Sherman, "seemed," said he, "to
+consider it as within the power of Congress by virtue of its Legislative
+authority;" to those of the "many well-judging men, with the President
+at their head, who," to again use his own words, "seem to suppose that
+it is within the reach of the Executive;" and lastly, to those "who
+express the opinion that it is not within the scope of either Executive
+or Legislative authority, or of Constitutional Amendment;" and after
+demolishing the arguments of those who held the two former of these
+positions, he proceeded to rebut the assumption that Slavery could not
+be abolished at all because it was not originally abolished by the
+Constitution.</p>
+
+<p>Continuing, he said: "Remember, now, the question is, can that
+Institution, which deals with Humanity as Property, which claims to
+shackle the mind, the soul, and the body, which brings to the level of
+the brute a portion of the race of Man, cease to be within the reach of
+the political power of the People of the United States, not because it
+was not at one time within their power, but because at that time they
+did not exert the power?</p>
+
+<p>"What says the Preamble to the Constitution? How pregnant with a
+conclusive answer is the Preamble, to the proposition that Slavery
+cannot be abolished! What does that Preamble state to have been the
+chief objects that the great and wise and good men had at heart, in
+recommending the Constitution, with that Preamble, to the adoption of
+the American People? That Justice might be established; that
+Tranquillity might be preserved; that the common Defense and general
+Welfare might be maintained; and, last and chief of all, that Liberty
+might be secured.</p>
+
+<p>"Is there no Justice in putting an end to human Slavery? Is there no
+danger to the Tranquillity of the Country in its existence? May it not
+interfere with the common Defense and general Welfare? And, above all,
+is it consistent with any notion, which the mind of man can conceive, of
+human Liberty?"</p>
+
+<p>He held that the very Amendatory clause of the Constitution under which
+it was proposed to make this Amendment, was probably inserted there from
+a conviction of that coming time "when Justice would call so loudly for
+the extinction of the Institution that her call could not be disobeyed,"
+and, when "the Peace and Tranquillity of the Land would demand, in
+thunder tones," its destruction, "as inconsistent with such Peace and
+Tranquillity."</p>
+
+<p>To the atrocious pretence that "there was a right to make a Slave of any
+human being"&mdash;which he said would have shocked every one of the framers
+of the Constitution had they heard it; and, what he termed, the nauseous
+declaration that "Slavery of the Black race is of Divine origin," and
+was intended to be perpetual; he said:</p>
+
+<p>"The Saviour of Mankind did not put an end to it by physical power, or
+by the declaration of any existing illegality, in word. His mission
+upon Earth was not to propagate His doctrines by force. He came to
+save, not to conquer. His purpose was not to march armed legions
+throughout the habitable Globe, securing the allegiance of those for
+whose safety He was striving. He warred by other influences. He aimed
+at the heart, principally. He inculcated his doctrines, more ennobling
+than any that the World, enlightened as it was before His advent upon
+Earth, had been able to discover. He taught to Man the obligation of
+brotherhood. He announced that the true duty of Man was to do to others
+as he would have others do to him&mdash;to all men, the World over; and
+unless some convert to the modern doctrine that Slavery itself finds not
+only a guarantee for its existence, but for its legal existence, in the
+Scripture, excepts from the operation of the influences which His
+morality brought to bear on the mind of the Christian world, the Black
+man, and shows that it was not intended to apply to Black men, then it
+is not true, it cannot be true, that He designed His doctrine not to be
+equally applicable to the Black and to the White, to the Race of Man as
+he then existed, or as he might exist in all after-time."</p>
+
+<p>To the assumption that the African Slaves were too utterly deficient and
+degraded, mentally and morally, to appreciate the blessings of Freedom,
+he opposed the eloquent fact that "wherever the flag of the United
+States, the symbol of human Liberty, now goes; under it, from their
+hereditary bondage, are to be found men and women and children
+assembling and craving its protection 'fleeing from' the iron of
+oppression that had pierced their souls, to the protection of that flag
+where they are 'gladdened by the light of Liberty.'"</p>
+
+<p>"It is idle to deny," said he&mdash;"we feel it in our own persons&mdash;how, with
+reference to that sentiment, all men are brethren. Look to the
+illustrations which the times now afford, how, in the illustration of
+that sentiment, do we differ from the Black man? He is willing to incur
+every personal danger which promises to result in throwing down his
+shackles, and making him tread the Earth, which God has created for all,
+as a man, and not as a Slave."</p>
+
+<p>Said he: "It is an instinct of the Soul. Tyranny may oppress it for
+ages and centuries; the pall of despotism may hang over it; but the
+sentiment is ever there; it kindles into a flame in the very furnace of
+affliction, and it avails itself of the first opportunity that offers,
+promising the least chance of escape, and wades through blood and
+slaughter to achieve it, and, whether it succeeds or fails,
+demonstrates, vindicates in the very effort, the inextinguishable right
+to Liberty."</p>
+
+<p>He thought that mischiefs might result from this measure, owing to the
+uneducated condition of the Slave, but they would be but temporary. At
+all events to "suffer those Africans," said he, "whom we are calling
+around our standard, and asking to aid us in restoring the Constitution
+and the power of the Government to its rightful authority, to be reduced
+to bondage again," would be "a disgrace to the Nation." The
+"Institution" must be terminated.</p>
+
+<p>"Terminate it," continued he, "and the wit of man will, as I think, be
+unable to devise any other topic upon which we can be involved in a
+fratricidal strife. God and nature, judging by the history of the past,
+intend us to be one. Our unity is written in the mountains and the
+rivers, in which we all have an interest. The very differences of
+climate render each important to the other, and alike important.</p>
+
+<p>"That mighty horde which, from time to time, have gone from the
+Atlantic, imbued with all the principles of human Freedom which animated
+their fathers in running the perils of the mighty Deep and seeking
+Liberty here, are now there; and as they have said, they will continue
+to say, until time shall be no more: 'We mean that the Government in
+future shall be, as it has been in the past&mdash;Once an exemplar of human
+Freedom, for the light and example of the World; illustrating in the
+blessings and the happiness it confers, the truth of the principles
+incorporated into the Declaration of Independence, that Life and Liberty
+are Man's inalienable right."</p>
+
+<p>Fortunately the Democratic opposition, in the Senate, to
+this measure, was too small in numbers to beat the proposed Amendment,
+but by offering amendments to it, its enemies succeeded in delaying its
+adoption.</p>
+
+<p>However, on the 5th of April, an amendment, offered by Garrett Davis,
+was acted upon. It was to strike out all after the preamble of the
+XIIIth Article of Amendment to the Constitution, proposed by the
+Judiciary Committee, and insert the words:</p>
+
+<p>"No Negro, or Person whose mother or grandmother is or was a Negro,
+shall be a citizen of the United States and be eligible to any Civil or
+Military office, or to any place of trust or profit under the United
+States."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Davis's amendment was rejected by a vote of 5 yeas to 32 nays; when
+he immediately moved to amend, by adding precisely the same words at the
+end of Section 1 of the proposed Article. It was again rejected. He
+then moved to amend by adding to the said Section these words:</p>
+
+<p>"But no Slave shall be entitled to his or her Freedom under this
+Amendment if resident at the time it takes effect in any State, the laws
+of which forbid Free Negroes to reside therein, until removed from such
+State by the Government of the United States."</p>
+
+<p>This also was rejected. Whereupon Mr. Powell moved to add, at the end
+of the first Section, the words:</p>
+
+<p>"No Slave shall be Emancipated by this Article unless the owner thereof
+shall be first paid the value of the Slave or Slaves so Emancipated."</p>
+
+<p>This likewise was rejected, on a yea and nay vote, by 2 yeas (Davis and
+Powell) to 34 nays; when Mr. Davis moved another amendment, viz.: to add
+at the end of Section 2 of the proposed Article, the following:</p>
+
+<p>"And when this Amendment of the Constitution shall have taken effect by
+Freeing the Slaves, Congress shall provide for the distribution and
+settlement of all the population of African descent in the United States
+among the several States and Territories thereof, in proportion to the
+White population of each State and Territory to the aggregate population
+of those of African descent."</p>
+
+<p>This met a like fate; whereupon the Senate adjourned, but, on the
+following day, the matter came up again for consideration:</p>
+
+<p>Hale, of New Hampshire, jubilantly declared that "this is a day that I
+and many others have long wished for, long hoped for, long striven for.
+* * * A day when the Nation is to commence its real life; or, if it is
+not the day, it is the dawning of the day; the day is near at hand * * *
+when the American People are to wake up to the meaning of the sublime
+truths which their fathers uttered years ago, and which have slumbered,
+dead-letters, upon the pages of our Constitution, of our Declaration of
+Independence, and of our history."</p>
+
+<p>McDougall, of California, on the other hand,&mdash;utterly regardless of the
+grandly patriotic resolutions of the Legislature of his State, which had
+just been presented to the Senate by his colleague&mdash;lugubriously
+declared:</p>
+
+<p>"In my judgment, it may well be said of us:</p>
+
+<center> 'Let the Heavens be hung in black<br>
+ And let the Earth put mourning on,'</center>
+
+<p>for in the history of no Free People, since the time the Persians came
+down upon Athens, have I known as melancholy a period as this day and
+year of Our Lord in our history; and if we can, by the blessing of God
+and by His favor, rise above it, it will be by His special providence,
+and by no act of ours."</p>
+
+<p>The obstructive tactics were now resumed, Mr. Powell leading off by a
+motion to amend, by adding to the Judiciary Committee's proposed
+Thirteenth Article of the Constitution, the following:</p>
+
+<p>"ART. 14.&mdash;The President and Vice-President shall hold their Offices for
+the term of four&mdash;[Which he subsequently modified to:
+'six years']&mdash;years. The person who has filled the Office of President shall not be
+reeligible."</p>
+
+<p>This amendment was rejected by 12 yeas to 32 nays; whereupon Mr. Powell
+moved to add to the Committee's Proposition another new Article, as
+follows:</p>
+
+<p>"ART. 14.&mdash;The principal Officer in each of the Executive Departments,
+and all persons connected with the Diplomatic Service, may be removed
+from office at the pleasure of the President. All other officers of the
+Executive Departments may be removed at any time by the President or
+other appointing power when their services are unnecessary, or for
+dishonesty, incapacity, inefficiency, misconduct, or neglect of duty,
+and when so removed, the removal shall be reported to the Senate,
+together with the reasons therefor."</p>
+
+<p>This amendment also being rejected, Mr. Powell offered another, which
+was to add a separate Article as follows:</p>
+
+<p>"ART. 14.&mdash;Every law, or Resolution having the force of law, shall
+relate to but one subject, and that shall be expressed in its title."</p>
+
+<p>This also being rejected&mdash;the negative vote being, as in other cases,
+without reference to the merits of the proposition&mdash;and Mr. Powell
+having now apparently exhausted his obstructive amendatory talents, Mr.
+Davis came to the aid of his Kentucky colleague by moving an amendment,
+to come in as an additional Article, being a new plan of Presidential
+election designed to do away with the quadrennial Presidential campaign
+before the People by giving to each State the right to nominate one
+candidate, and leaving it to a Convention of both Houses of
+Congress&mdash;and, in case of disagreement, to the Supreme Court of the United States
+&mdash;to elect a President and a Vice-President.</p>
+
+<p>The rejection of this proposition apparently exhausted the stock of
+possible amendments possessed by the Democratic opposition, and the
+Joint Resolution, precisely as it came from the Judiciary Committee,
+having been agreed to by that body, "as in Committee of the Whole," was
+now, April 6th, reported to the Senate for its concurrence.</p>
+
+<p>On the following day, Mr. Hendricks uttered a lengthy jeremiad on the
+War, and its lamentable results; intimated that along the Mississippi,
+the Negroes, freed by the advance of our invading Armies and Navies,
+instead of being happy and industrious, were without protection or
+provision and almost without clothing, while at least 200,000 of them
+had prematurely perished, and that such was the fate reserved for the
+4,000,000 Negroes if liberated; and declared he would not vote for the
+Resolution, "because," said he, "the times are not auspicious."</p>
+
+<p>Very different indeed was the attitude of Mr. Henderson, of Missouri,
+Border-State man though he was. In the course of a speech, of much
+power, which he opened with an allusion to the 115,000 Slaves owned in
+his State in 1860&mdash;as showing how deeply interested Missouri "must be in
+the pending proposition"&mdash;the Senator announced that: "Our great
+interest, as lovers of the Union, is in the preservation and
+perpetuation of the Union." He declared himself a Slaveholder, yet none
+the less desired the adoption of this Thirteenth Article of Amendment,
+for, said he: "We cannot save the Institution if we would. We ought not
+if we could. * * * If it were a blessing, I, for one, would be
+defending it to the last. It is a curse, and not a blessing. Therefore
+let it go. * * * Let the iniquity be cast away!"</p>
+
+<p>It was about this time that a remarkable letter written by Mr. Lincoln
+to a Kentuckian, on the subject of Emancipation, appeared in print. It
+is interesting as being not alone the President's own statement of his
+views, from the beginning, as to Slavery, and how he came to be "driven"
+to issue the Proclamation of Emancipation, and as showing how the Union
+Cause had gained by its issue, but also in disclosing, indirectly, how
+incessantly the subject was revolved in his own mind, and urged by him
+upon the minds of others. The publication of the letter, moreover, was
+not without its effect on the ultimate action of the Congress and the
+States in adopting the Thirteenth Amendment. It ran thus:</p>
+
+<br><br><br><br>
+
+<p> "EXECUTIVE MANSION.<br>
+ "WASHINGTON, April 4, 1864.</p>
+
+<p>"A. G. HODGES, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.</p>
+
+<p>"MY DEAR SIR: You ask me to put in writing the substance of&mdash;what I
+verbally said the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and
+Senator Dixon. It was about as follows:</p>
+
+<p>"I am naturally anti-Slavery. If Slavery is not wrong, nothing is
+wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel, and yet I
+have never understood that the 'Presidency conferred upon me an
+unrestricted right to act officially upon this judgment and feeling.</p>
+
+<p>"It was in the oath I took, that I would to the best of my ability
+preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. I
+could not take the Office without taking the oath. Nor was it my view
+that I might take an oath to get power, and break the oath in using the
+power.</p>
+
+<p>"I understood, too, that in ordinary and Civil Administration this oath
+even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on
+the moral question of Slavery. I had publicly declared this many times,
+and in many ways.</p>
+
+<p>"And I aver that, to this day, I have done no Official act in mere
+deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on Slavery.</p>
+
+<p>"I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to
+the best of my ability, imposed upon me the duty of preserving by every
+indispensable means, that Government&mdash;that Nation, of which that
+Constitution was the Organic Law.</p>
+
+<p>"Was it possible to lose the Nation and yet preserve the Constitution?</p>
+
+<p>"By General Law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must
+be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to save a
+limb. I felt that measures, otherwise Unconstitutional, might become
+lawful, by becoming Indispensable to the Constitution through the
+preservation of the Nation.</p>
+
+<p>"Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not
+feel that, to the best of my ability, I have even tried to preserve the
+Constitution, if, to save Slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit
+the wreck of Government, Country, and Constitution, altogether.</p>
+
+<p>"When, early in the War, General Fremont attempted Military
+Emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an
+Indispensable Necessity.</p>
+
+<p>"When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested
+the Arming of the Blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an
+Indispensable Necessity.</p>
+
+<p>"When, still later, General Hunter attempted Military Emancipation, I
+again forbade it, because I did not yet think the Indispensable
+Necessity had come.</p>
+
+<p>"When in March, and May, and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive
+appeals to the Border-States to favor compensated Emancipation, I
+believed the Indispensable Necessity for Military Emancipation and
+arming the Blacks would come, unless averted by that measure.</p>
+
+<p>"They declined the proposition, and I was, in my best judgment, driven
+to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it, the
+Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the Colored element. I
+chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss,
+but of this I was not entirely confident.</p>
+
+<p>"More than a year of trial now shows no loss by it in our Foreign
+Relations, none in our home popular sentiment, none in our white
+Military force, no loss by it anyhow, or anywhere. On the contrary, it
+shows a gain of quite a hundred and thirty thousand soldiers, seamen,
+and laborers.</p>
+
+<p>"These are palpable facts, about which, as facts, there can be no
+cavilling. We have the men; and we could not have had them without the
+measure.</p>
+
+<p>"And now let any Union man who complains of this measure, test himself
+by writing down in one line, that he is for subduing the Rebellion by
+force of arms; and in the next, that he is for taking one hundred and
+thirty thousand men from the Union side, and placing them where they
+would be best for the measure he condemns. If he cannot face his case
+so stated, it is only because he cannot face the truth.</p>
+
+<p>"I add a word which was not in the verbal conversation. In telling this
+tale, I attempt no compliment to my own sagacity. I claim not to have
+controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me.
+Now at the end of three years' struggle, the Nation's condition is not
+what either Party, or any man, devised or expected. God alone can claim
+it.</p>
+
+<p>"Whither it is tending seems plain. If God now wills the removal of a
+great wrong, and wills also that we of the North, as well as you of the
+South, shall pay fairly for our complicity in that wrong, impartial
+history will find therein new causes to attest and revere the Justice
+and goodness of God.<br>
+ "Yours truly,<br>
+ "A. LINCOLN."</p>
+<br><br>
+<p>
+The 8th of April (1864) turned out to be the decisive field-day in the
+Senate. Sumner endeavored to close the debate on that day in a speech
+remarkable no less for its power and eloquence of statement, its
+strength of Constitutional exposition, and its abounding evidences of
+extensive historical research and varied learning, than for its
+patriotic fervor and devotion to human Freedom.</p>
+
+<p>Toward the end of that great speech, however, he somewhat weakened its
+force by suggesting a change in the phraseology of the proposed
+Thirteenth Amendment, so that, instead of almost precisely following the
+language of the Jeffersonian Ordinance of 1787, as recommended by the
+Judiciary Committee of the Senate, it should read thus:</p>
+
+<p>"All Persons are Equal before the Law, so that no person can hold
+another as a Slave; and the Congress may make all laws necessary and
+proper to carry this Article into effect everywhere within the United
+States and the jurisdiction thereof."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Sumner's idea in antagonizing the Judiciary Committee's proposition
+with this, was to introduce into our Organic Act, distinctive words
+asserting the "Equality before the Law" of all persons, as expressed in
+the Constitutional Charters of Belgium, Italy and Greece, as well as in
+the various Constitutions of France&mdash;beginning with that of September,
+1791, which declared (Art. 1) that "Men are born and continue Free and
+Equal in Rights;" continuing in that of June, 1793, which declares that
+"All Men are Equal by Nature and before the Law:" in that of June, 1814,
+which declares that "Frenchmen are Equal before the Law, whatever may be
+otherwise their title and ranks;" and in the Constitutional Charter of
+August, 1830 in similar terms to the last.</p>
+
+<p>"But," said he, "while desirous of seeing the great rule of Freedom
+which we are about to ordain, embodied in a text which shall be like the
+precious casket to the more precious treasure, yet * * * I am consoled
+by the thought that the most homely text containing such a rule will be
+more beautiful far than any words of poetry or eloquence, and that it
+will endure to be read with gratitude when the rising dome of this
+Capitol, with the Statue of Liberty which surmounts it, has crumbled to
+dust."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Sumner's great speech, however, by no means ended the debate. It
+brought Mr. Powell to his feet with a long and elaborate contention
+against the general proposition, in the course of which he took occasion
+to sneer at Sumner's "most remarkable effort," as one of his "long
+illogical rhapsodies on Slavery, like:</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> '&mdash;a Tale
+ Told by an Idiot, full of sound and fury,
+ Signifying nothing.'"</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>He professed that he wanted "the Union to be restored with the
+Constitution as it is;" that he verily believed the passage of this
+Amendment would be "the most effective Disunion measure that could be
+passed by Congress"&mdash;and, said he, "As a lover of the Union I oppose
+it."</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [This phrase slightly altered, in words, but not in meaning, to
+ "The Union as it was, and the Constitution as it is," afterward
+ became the Shibboleth under which the Democratic Party in the
+ Presidential Campaign of 1864, marched to defeat.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>He endeavored to impute the blame for the War, to the northern
+Abolitionists, for, said he: "Had there been no Abolitionists, North,
+there never would have been a Fire-eater, South,"&mdash;apparently ignoring
+the palpable fact that had there been no Slavery in the South, there
+could have been no "Abolitionists, North."</p>
+
+<p>He heatedly denounced the "fanatical gentlemen" who desired the passage
+of this measure; declared they intended by its passage "to destroy the
+Institution of Slavery or to destroy the Union," and exclaimed: "Pass
+this Amendment and you make an impassable chasm, as if you were to put a
+lake of burning fire, between the adhering States and those who are out.
+You will then have to make it a War of conquest and extermination before
+you can ever bring them back under the flag of the Government. There is
+no doubt about that proposition."</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Sumner, at this point, withdrew his proposed amendment, at the
+suggestion of Mr. Howard, who expressed a preference "to dismiss all
+reference to French Constitutions and French Codes, and go back to the
+good old Anglo-Saxon language employed by our Fathers, in the Ordinance
+of 1787, (in) an expression adjudicated upon repeatedly, which is
+perfectly well understood both by the public and by Judicial
+Tribunals&mdash;a phrase, which is peculiarly near and dear to the people of the
+Northwestern Territory, from whose soil Slavery was excluded by it."</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [The following is the language of "the Ordinance of 1787" thus
+ referred to:</p>
+
+<p> "ART. 6.&mdash;There shall be neither Slavery nor Involuntary Servitude
+ in the said Territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes,
+ whereof the party shall have been duly convicted: * * *."]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Mr. Davis thereupon made another opposition speech and, at its
+conclusion, Mr. Saulsbury offered, as a substitute, an Article,
+comprising no less than twenty sections&mdash;that, he said, "embodied in
+them some things" which "did not meet his personal approbation," but he
+had consented to offer them to the Senate as "a Compromise"&mdash;as "a Peace
+offering."</p>
+
+<p>The Saulsbury substitute being voted down, the debate closed with a
+speech by Mr. McDougall&mdash;an eloquent protest from his standpoint, in
+which, after endorsing the wild statement of Mr. Hendricks that 250,000
+of the people of African descent had been prematurely destroyed on the
+Mississippi, he continued.</p>
+
+<p>"This policy will ingulf them. It is as simple a truth as has ever been
+taught by any history. The Slaves of ancient time were not the Slaves
+of a different Race. The Romans compelled the Gaul and the Celt,
+brought them to their own Country, and some of them became great poets,
+and some eloquent orators, and some accomplished wits, and they became
+citizens of the Republic of Greece, and of the Republic of Rome, and of
+the Empire.</p>
+
+<p>"This is not the condition of these persons with whom we are now
+associated, and about whose affairs we undertake to establish
+administration. They can never commingle with us. It may not be within
+the reading of some learned Senators, and yet it belongs to demonstrated
+Science, that the African race and the European are different; and I
+here now say it as a fact established by science, that the eighth
+generation of the Mixed race formed by the union of the African and
+European, cannot continue their species. Quadroons have few children;
+with Octoroons reproduction is impossible.</p>
+
+<p>"It establishes as a law of nature that the African has no proper
+relation to the European, Caucasian, blood. I would have them kindly
+treated. * * * Against all such policy and all such conduct I shall
+protest as a man, in the name of humanity, and of law, and of truth, and
+of religion."</p>
+
+<p>The amendment made, as in Committee of the Whole, having been concurred
+in, etc., the Joint Resolution, as originally reported by the Judiciary
+Committee, was at last passed, (April 8th)&mdash;by a vote of 38 yeas to 6
+nays&mdash;Messrs. Hendricks and McDougall having the unenviable distinction
+of being the only two Senators, (mis-)representing Free States, who
+voted against this definitive Charter of American Liberty.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [The full Senate vote, on passing the Thirteenth Amendment, was:</p>
+
+<p> YEAS&mdash;Messrs. Anthony, Brown, Chandler, Clark, Collamer, Conness,
+ Cowan, Dixon, Doolittle, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Grimes, Hale,
+ Harding, Harlan, Harris, Henderson, Howard, Howe, Johnson, Lane of
+ Indiana, Lane of Kansas, Morgan, Morrill, Nesmith, Pomeroy, Ramsey,
+ Sherman, Sprague, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Trumbull, Van Winkle, Wade,
+ Wilkinson, Willey, and Wilson&mdash;38.</p>
+
+<p> NAYs&mdash;Messrs. Davis, Hendricks, McDougall, Powell, Riddle, and
+ Saulsbury.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+<a name="wade"></a>
+<center>
+<img alt="p552-wade.jpg (82K)" src="images/p552-wade.jpg" height="872" width="581">
+</center>
+<br><br><br>
+<a name="ch24"></a>
+<br><br>
+<center>
+<h2>
+ CHAPTER XXIV.<br><br>
+
+ TREASON IN THE NORTHERN CAMPS.
+
+</h2>
+</center>
+<br>
+
+
+<p>The immortal Charter of Freedom had, as we have seen, with comparative
+ease, after a ten days' debate, by the power of numbers, run the
+gauntlet of the Senate; but now it was to be subjected to the much more
+trying and doubtful ordeal of the House. What would be its fate there?
+This was a question which gave to Mr. Lincoln, and the other friends of
+Liberty and Union, great concern.</p>
+
+<p>It is true that various votes had recently been taken in that body, upon
+propositions which had an indirect bearing upon the subject of
+Emancipation, as, for instance, that of the 1st of February, 1864, when,
+by a vote of 80 yeas to 46 nays, it had adopted a Resolution declaring
+"That a more vigorous policy to enlist, at an early day, and in larger
+numbers, in our Army, persons of African descent, would meet the
+approbation of the House;" and that vote, although indirect, being so
+very nearly a two-thirds vote, was most encouraging. But, on the other
+hand, a subsequent Resolution, squarely testing the sense of the House
+upon the subject, had been carried by much less than a two-thirds vote.</p>
+
+<p>This latter Resolution, offered by Mr. Arnold, after conference with Mr.
+Lincoln, with the very purpose of making a test, was in these direct
+terms:</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That the Constitution shall be so amended as to Abolish
+Slavery in the United States wherever it now exists, and to prohibit its
+existence in every part thereof forever."</p>
+
+<p>The vote, adopting it, was but 78 yeas to 62 nays. * This vote,
+therefore, upon the Arnold Resolution, being nowhere near the two-thirds
+affirmative vote necessary to secure the passage through the House of
+the Senate Joint Resolution on this subject amendatory of the
+Constitution, was most discouraging.</p>
+
+<p>It was definite enough, however, to show the necessity of a change from
+the negative to the affirmative side of at least fifteen votes. While
+therefore the outlook was discouraging it was far from hopeless. The
+debate in the Senate had already had its effect upon the public mind.
+That, and the utterances of Mr. Lincoln&mdash;and further discussion in the
+House, it was thought, might produce such a pressure from the loyal
+constituencies both in the Free and Border Slave-States as to compel
+success.</p>
+
+<p>But from the very beginning of the year 1864, as if instinctively aware
+that their Rebel friends were approaching the crisis of their fate, and
+needed now all the help that their allies of the North could give them,
+the Anti-War Democrats, in Congress, and out, had been stirring
+themselves with unusual activity.</p>
+
+<p>In both Houses of Congress, upon all possible occasions, they had been
+striving, as they still strove, with the venom of their
+widely-circulated speeches, to poison the loyal Northern and Border-State mind,
+in the hope that the renomination of Mr. Lincoln might be defeated, the
+chance for Democratic success at the coming Presidential election be
+thereby increased, and, if nothing else came of it, the Union Cause be
+weakened and the Rebel Cause correspondingly strengthened.</p>
+
+<p>At the same time, evidently under secret instructions from their
+friends, the Conspirators in arms, they endeavored to create
+heart-burnings and jealousies and ill-feeling between the Eastern (especially
+the New England) States and the Western States, and unceasingly attacked
+the Protective-Tariff, Internal Revenue, the Greenback, the Draft, and
+every other measure or thing upon which the life of the Union depended.</p>
+
+<p>Most of these Northern-Democratic agitators, "Stealing the livery of
+Heaven to serve the Devil in," endeavored to conceal their treacherous
+designs under a veneer of gushing lip-loyalty, but that disguise was
+"too thin" to deceive either their contemporaries or those who come
+after them. Some of their language too, as well as their blustering
+manner, strangely brought back to recollection the old days of Slavery
+when the plantation-whip was cracked in the House, and the air was blue
+with execration of New England.</p>
+
+<p>Said Voorhees, of Indiana, (January 11, 1864) when the House was
+considering a Bill "to increase the Internal Revenue and for other
+purposes:"</p>
+
+<p>"I want to know whether the West has any friends upon the floor of this
+House? We pay every dollar that is to be levied by this Tax Bill. * *
+* The Manufacturing Interest pays not a dollar into the public Treasury
+that stays there. And yet airs of patriotism are put on here by men
+representing that interest. I visited New England last Summer, * * *
+when I heard the swelling hum of her Manufactories, and saw those who
+only a short time ago worked but a few hands, now working their
+thousands, and rolling up their countless wealth, I felt that it was an
+unhealthy prosperity. To my mind it presented a wealth wrung from the
+labor, the sinews, the bone and muscle of the men who till the soil,
+taxed to an illegitimate extent to foster and support that great System
+of local wealth. * * * I do not intend to stand idly by and see one
+portion of the Country robbed and oppressed for the benefit of another."</p>
+
+<p>And the same day, replying to Mr. Morrill of Vermont, he exclaimed: "Let
+him show me that the plethoric, bloated Manufacturers of New England are
+paying anything to support the Government, and I will recognize it."</p>
+
+<p>Washburne, of Illinois got back at this part of Mr. Voorhees's speech
+rather neatly, by defending the North-west as being "not only willing to
+stand taxation" which had been "already imposed, but * * * any
+additional taxation which," said he, "may be necessary to crush out this
+Rebellion, and to hang the Rebels in the South, and the Rebel
+sympathizers in the North." And, he pointedly added: "Complaint has
+been made against New England. I know that kind of talk. I have heard
+too often that kind of slang about New England. I heard it here for ten
+years, when your Barksdales, and your Keitts's, and your other Traitors,
+now in arms against the Government, filled these Halls with their
+pestilential assaults not only upon New England, but on the Free North
+generally."</p>
+
+<p>Kelley of Pennsylvania, however, more fitly characterized the speech of
+Voorhees, when he termed it "a pretty, indeed a somewhat striking,
+paraphrase of the argument of Mr. Lamar, the Rebel Agent,&mdash;[in 1886,
+Secretary of the Interior]&mdash;to his confreres in Treason, as we find it
+in the recently published correspondence: 'Drive gold coin out of the
+Country, and induce undue Importation of Foreign products so as to
+strike down the Financial System. You can have no further hope for
+Foreign recognition. It is evident the weight of arms is against us;
+and it is clear that we can only succeed by striking down the Financial
+System of the Country.' It was an admirable paraphrase of the
+Instructions of Mr. Lamar to the Rebel Agents in the North."</p>
+
+<p>The impression was at this time abroad, and there were not wanting
+elements of proof, that certain members of Congress were trusted
+Lieutenants of the Arch-copperhead and Outlaw, Vallandigham. Certain it
+is, that many of these leaders, six months before, attended and
+addressed the great gathering from various parts of the Country, of
+nearly one hundred thousand Vallandigham-Anti-War Peace-Democrats, at
+Springfield, Illinois&mdash;the very home of Abraham Lincoln&mdash;which adopted,
+during a lull, when they were not yelling themselves hoarse for
+Vallandigham, a resolution declaring against "the further offensive
+prosecution of the War" as being subversive of the Constitution and
+Government, and proposing a National Peace Convention, and, as a
+consequence, Peace, "the Union as it was," and, substantially such
+Constitutional guarantees as the Rebels might choose to demand! And
+this too, at a time (June 13, 1863), when Grant, after many recent
+glorious victories, had been laying siege to Vicksburg, and its Rebel
+Army of 37,000 men, for nearly a month, with every reason to hope for
+its speedy fall.</p>
+
+<p>No wonder that under such circumstances, the news of such a gathering of
+the Northern Democratic sympathizers with Treason, and of their adoption
+of such treasonable Resolutions, should encourage the Rebels in the same
+degree that Union men were disheartened! No wonder that Lee, elated by
+this and other evidences of Northern sympathy with Rebellion, at once
+determined to commence a second grand invasion of the North, and on the
+very next day (June 14th,) moved Northward with all his Rebel hosts to
+be welcomed, he fondly hoped, by his Northern friends of Maryland and
+elsewhere! As we have seen, it took the bloody Battle of Gettysburg to
+undeceive him as to the character of that welcome.</p>
+
+<p>Further than this, Mr. Cox had stumped Ohio, in the succeeding election,
+in a desperate effort to make the banished Traitor, Vallandigham&mdash;the
+Chief Northern commander of the "Knights of the Golden Circle"
+(otherwise known as the "Order of the Sons of Liberty," and "O. A. K."
+or "Order of American Knights")&mdash;Governor of that great State.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [The Rebel General Sterling Price being the chief Southern
+ commander of this many-named treasonable organization, which in the
+ North alone numbered over 500,000 men.</p>
+
+<p> August, 1864.&mdash;See Report of Judge Advocate Holt on certain "Secret
+ Associations," in Appendix,]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>And it only lacked a few months of the time when quantities of copies of
+the treasonable Ritual of the "Order of American Knights"&mdash;as well as
+correspondence touching the purchase of thousands of Garibaldi rifles
+for transportation to the West&mdash;were found in the offices of leading
+Democrats then in Congress.</p>
+
+<p>When, therefore, it is said, and repeated, that there were not wanting
+elements of proof, outside of Congressional utterances and actions, that
+leading Democrats in Congress were trusted Lieutenants of the Supreme
+Commander of over half a million of Northern Rebel-sympathizers bound
+together, and to secrecy, by oaths, which were declared to be paramount
+to all other oaths, the violation of which subjected the offender to a
+shameful death somewhat like that, of being "hung, drawn, and
+quartered," which was inflicted in the middle ages for the crime of
+Treason to the Crown&mdash;it will be seen that the statement is supported by
+circumstantial, if not by positive and direct, evidence.</p>
+
+<p>Whether the Coxes, the Garret Davises, the Saulsburys, the Fernando
+Woods, the Alexander Longs, the Allens, the Holmans, and many other
+prominent Congressmen of that sort,&mdash;were merely in close communion with
+these banded "Knights," or were actual members of their secret
+organizations, may be an open question. But it is very certain that if
+they all were not oath-bound members, they generally pursued the precise
+methods of those who were; and that, as a rule, while they often loudly
+proclaimed loyalty and love for the Union, they were always ready to act
+as if their loyalty and love were for the so-called Confederacy.</p>
+
+<p>Indeed, it was one of these other "loyal" Democrats, who even preceded
+Voorhees, in raising the Sectional cry of: The West, against New
+England. It was on this same Internal Revenue Bill, that Holman of
+Indiana had, the day before Voorhees's attack, said:</p>
+
+<p>"If the Manufacture of the Northwest is to be taxed so heavily, a
+corresponding rate of increase must be imposed on the Manufactures of
+New England and Pennsylvania, or, will gentlemen tax us without limit
+for the benefit of their own Section? * * * I protest against what I
+believe is intended to be a discrimination against one Section of the
+Country, by increasing the tax three-fold, without a corresponding
+increase upon the burdens of other Sections."</p>
+
+<p>But these dreadfully "loyal" Democrats&mdash;who did the bidding of
+traitorous masters in their Treason to the Union, and thus, while
+posturing as "Patriots," "fired upon the rear" of our hard-pressed
+Armies&mdash;were super-sensitive on this point. And, when they could get
+hold of a quiet sort of a man, inclined to peaceful methods of
+discussion, how they would, terrier-like, pounce upon him, and extract
+from him, if they could, some sort of negative satisfaction!</p>
+
+<p>Thus, for instance, on the 22nd of January, when one of these quiet men
+&mdash;Morris of New York&mdash;was in the midst of an inoffensive speech, Mr. Cox
+"bristled up," and blusteringly asked whether he meant to say that he
+(Cox) had "ever been the apologist or the defender of a Traitor?"</p>
+
+<p>And Morris not having said so, mildly replied that he did "not so
+charge"&mdash;all of which little bit of by-play hugely pleased the touchy
+Mr. Cox, and his clansmen.</p>
+
+<p>But on the day following, their smiles vanished under the words of
+Spalding or Ohio, who, after referring to the crocodile-tears shed by
+Democratic Congressmen over the Confiscation Resolution&mdash;on the pretense
+that it would hunt down "innocent women and children" of the Rebels,
+when they had never a word of sympathy for the widows and children of
+the two hundred thousand dead soldiers of the Union&mdash;continued:</p>
+
+<p>"They can see our poor soldiers return, minus an arm, minus a leg, as
+they pass through these lobbies, but their only care is to protect the
+property of Rebels. And we are asked by one of my colleagues, (Mr. Cox)
+does the gentleman from New York intend to call us Traitors? My friend,
+Mr. Morris, modestly answered no! If he had asked that question of me,
+he knows what my answer would have been! I have seen Rebel officers at
+Johnson's Island, and I have taken them by the hand because they have
+fought us fairly in the field and did not seek to break down the
+Government while living under its protection. Yes, Sir, that gentleman
+knows that I would have said to him that I have more respect for an open
+and avowed Traitor in the field, than for a sympathizer in this Hall.
+Four months have scarcely gone by since that gentleman and his political
+friends were advocating the election of a man for the Gubernatorial
+office in my State, who was an open and avowed advocate of Secession&mdash;AN
+OUTLAW AT THAT!"</p>
+
+<p>And old Thaddeus Stevens&mdash;the clear-sighted and courageous "Old
+Commoner"&mdash;followed up Spalding, and struck very close to the root and
+animus of the Democratic opposition, when he exclaimed:</p>
+
+<p>"All this struggle by calm and dignified and moderate 'Patriots;' all
+this clamor against 'Radicals;' all this cry of 'the Union as it Was,
+and the Constitution as it Is;' is but a persistent effort to
+reestablish Slavery, and to rivet anew and forever the chains of Bondage
+on the limbs of Immortal beings. May the God of Justice thwart their
+designs and paralyze their wicked efforts!"</p>
+
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+<a name="mcclellan"></a>
+<center>
+<img alt="p594-mcclellan.jpg (63K)" src="images/p594-mcclellan.jpg" height="764" width="581">
+</center>
+<br><br><br>
+<a name="ch25"></a>
+<br><br>
+<center>
+<h2>
+ CHAPTER XXV.<br><br>
+
+ "THE FIRE IN THE REAR."
+
+</h2>
+</center>
+<br>
+
+
+<p>The treacherous purposes of professedly-loyal Copperheads being seen
+through, and promptly and emphatically denounced to the Country by Union
+statesmen, the Copperheads aforesaid concluded that the profuse
+circulation of their own Treason-breeding speeches&mdash;through the medium
+of the treasonable organizations before referred to, permeating the
+Northern States,&mdash;would more than counteract all that Union men could
+say or do. Besides, the fiat had gone forth, from their Rebel masters
+at Richmond, to Agitate the North.</p>
+
+<p>Hence, day after day, Democrat after Democrat, in the one House or the
+other, continued to air his disloyal opinions, and to utter more or less
+virulent denunciations of the Government which guarded and protected
+him.</p>
+
+<p>Thus, Brooks, of New York, on the 25th of January (1864), sneeringly
+exclaimed: "Why, what absurdity it is to talk at this Capitol of
+prosecuting the War by the liberation of Slaves, when from the dome of
+this building there can be heard at this hour the booming of cannon in
+the distance!"</p>
+
+<p>Thus, also, on the day following, Fernando Wood&mdash;the same man who, while
+Mayor of New York at the outbreak of the Rebellion, had, under
+Rebel-guidance, proposed the Secession from the Union, and the Independence,
+of that great Metropolis,&mdash;declared to the House that: "No Government
+has pursued a foe with such unrelenting, vindictive malignity as we are
+now pursuing those who came into the Union with us, whose blood has been
+freely shed on every battle-field of the Country until now, with our
+own; who fought by our side in the American Revolution, and in the War
+of 1812 with Great Britain; who bore our banners bravest and highest in
+our victorious march from Vera Cruz to the City of Mexico, and who but
+yesterday sat in these Halls contributing toward the maintenance of our
+glorious institutions."</p>
+
+<p>Then he went on, in the spirit of prophecy, to declare that: "No purely
+agricultural people, fighting for the protection of their own Domestic
+Institutions upon their own soil, have ever yet been conquered. I say
+further, that no revolted people have ever been subdued after they have
+been able to maintain an Independent government for three years." And
+then, warming up to an imperative mood, he made this explicit
+announcement: "We are at War. * * * Whether it be a Civil War,
+Rebellion, Revolution, or Foreign War, it matters little. IT MUST
+CEASE; and I want this Administration to tell the American People WHEN
+it will cease!" Again, only two days afterward, he took occasion to
+characterize a Bill, amendatory of the enrollment Act, as "this
+infamous, Unconstitutional conscription Act!"</p>
+
+<p>C. A. White, of Ohio, was another of the malcontents who undertook, with
+others of the same Copperhead faith, to "maintain, that," as he
+expressed it, "the War in which we are at present engaged is wrong in
+itself; that the policy adopted by the Party in power for its
+prosecution is wrong; that the Union cannot be restored, or, if
+restored, maintained, by the exercise of the coercive power of the
+Government, by War; that the War is opposed to the restoration of the
+Union, destructive of the rights of the States and the liberties of the
+People. It ought, therefore, to be brought to a speedy and immediate
+close."</p>
+
+<p>It was about this time also that, emboldened by immunity from punishment
+for these utterances in the interest of armed Rebels, Edgerton of
+Indiana, was put forward to offer resolutions "for Peace, upon the basis
+of a restoration of the Federal Union under the Constitution as it is,"
+etc.</p>
+
+<p>Thereafter, in both Senate and House, such speeches by
+Rebel-sympathizers, the aiders and abettors of Treason, grew more frequent and
+more virulent than ever. As was well said to the House, by one of the
+Union members from Ohio (Mr. Eckley):</p>
+
+<p>"A stranger, if he listened to the debates here, would think himself in
+the Confederate Congress. I do not believe that if these Halls were
+occupied to-day by Davis, Toombs, Wigfall, Rhett, and Pryor, they could
+add anything to the violence of assault, the falsity of accusation, or
+the malignity of attack, with which the Government has been assailed,
+and the able, patriotic, and devoted men who are charged with its
+Administration have been maligned, in both ends of the Capitol. The
+closing scenes of the Thirty-Sixth Congress, the treasonable
+declarations there made, contain nothing that we cannot hear, in the
+freedom of debate, without going to Richmond or to the camps of Treason,
+where most of the actors in those scenes are now in arms against us."</p>
+
+<p>With such a condition of things in Congress, it is not surprising that
+the Richmond Enquirer announced that the North was "distracted,
+exhausted, and impoverished," and would, "through the agency of a strong
+conservative element in the Free States," soon treat with the Rebels "on
+acceptable terms."</p>
+
+<p>Things indeed had reached such a pass, in the House of Representatives
+especially, that it was felt they could not much longer go on in this
+manner; that an example must be made of some one or other of these
+Copperheads. But the very knowledge of the existence of such a feeling
+of just and patriotic irritation against the continued free utterance of
+such sentiments in the Halls of Congress, seemed only to make some of
+them still more defiant. And, when the 8th of April dawned, it was
+known among all the Democrats in Congress, that Alexander Long proposed
+that day to make a speech which would "go a bow-shot beyond them all" in
+uttered Treason. He would speak right out, what the other Conspirators
+thought and meant, but dared not utter, before the World.</p>
+
+<p>A crowded floor, and packed galleries, were on hand to listen to the
+written, deliberate Treason, as it fell from his lips in the House. His
+speech began with an arraignment of the Government for treachery,
+incompetence, failure, tyranny, and all sorts of barbarous actions and
+harsh intentions, toward the Rebels&mdash;which led him to the indignant
+exclamation:</p>
+
+<p>"Will they throw down their arms and submit to the terms? Who shall
+believe that the free, proud American blood, which courses with as quick
+pulsation through their veins as our own, will not be spilled to the
+last drop in resistance?"</p>
+
+<p>Warming up, he proceeded to say: "Can the Union be restored by War? I
+answer most unhesitatingly and deliberately, No, never; 'War is final,
+eternal separation.'"</p>
+
+<p>He claimed that the War was "wrong;" that it was waged "in violation of
+the Constitution," and would "if continued, result speedily in the
+destruction of the Government and the loss of Civil Liberty, and ought
+therefore, to immediately cease."</p>
+
+<p>He held also "that the Confederate States are out of the Union,
+occupying the position of an Independent Power de facto; have been
+acknowledged as a belligerent both by Foreign Nations and our own
+Government; maintained their Declaration of Independence, for three
+years, by force of arms; and the War has cut asunder all the obligations
+that bound them under the Constitution."</p>
+
+<p>"Much better," said he, "would it have been for us in the beginning,
+much better would it be for us now, to consent to a division of our
+magnificent Empire, and cultivate amicable relations with our estranged
+brethren, than to seek to hold them to us by the power of the sword. *
+* * I am reluctantly and despondingly forced to the conclusion that the
+Union is lost, never to be restored. * * * I see neither North nor
+South, any sentiment on which it is possible to build a Union. * * * in
+attempting to preserve our Jurisdiction over the Southern States we have
+lost our Constitutional Form of Government over the Northern. * * * The
+very idea upon which this War is founded, coercion of States, leads to
+despotism. * * * I now believe that there are but two alternatives, and
+they are either an acknowledgment of the Independence of the South as an
+independent Nation, or their complete subjugation and extermination as a
+People; and of these alternatives I prefer the former."</p>
+
+<p>As Long took his seat, amid the congratulations of his Democratic
+friends, Garfield arose, and, to compliments upon the former's peculiar
+candor and honesty, added denunciation for his Treason. After drawing
+an effective parallel between Lord Fairfax and Robert E. Lee, both of
+whom had cast their lots unwillingly with the enemies of this Land, when
+the Wars of the Revolution and of the Rebellion respectively opened,
+Garfield proceeded:</p>
+
+<p>"But now, when hundreds of thousands of brave souls have gone up to God
+under the shadow of the Flag, and when thousands more, maimed and
+shattered in the Contest, are sadly awaiting the deliverance of death;
+now, when three years of terrific warfare have raged over us, when our
+Armies have pushed the Rebellion back over mountains and rivers and
+crowded it back into narrow limits, until a wall of fire girds it; now,
+when the uplifted hand of a majestic People is about to let fall the
+lightning of its conquering power upon the Rebellion; now, in the quiet
+of this Hall, hatched in the lowest depths of a similar dark Treason,
+there rises a Benedict Arnold and proposes to surrender us all up, body
+and spirit, the Nation and the Flag, its genius and its honor, now and
+forever, to the accursed Traitors to our Country. And that proposition
+comes&mdash;God forgive and pity my beloved State!&mdash;it comes from a citizen
+of the honored and loyal Commonwealth of Ohio! I implore you, brethren
+in this House, not to believe that many such births ever gave pangs to
+my mother-State such as she suffered when that Traitor was born!"</p>
+
+<p>As he uttered these sturdy words, the House and galleries were agitated
+with that peculiar rustling movement and low murmuring sound known as a
+"sensation," while the Republican side with difficulty restrained the
+applause they felt like giving, until he sadly proceeded:</p>
+
+<p>"I beg you not to believe that on the soil of that State another such
+growth has ever deformed the face of Nature and darkened the light of
+God's day."</p>
+
+<p>The hush that followed was broken by the suggestive whisper:
+"Vallandigham!"</p>
+
+<p>"But, ah," continued the Speaker&mdash;as his voice grew sadder still&mdash;"I am
+reminded that there are other such. My zeal and love for Ohio have
+carried me too far. I retract. I remember that only a few days since,
+a political Convention met at the Capital of my State, and almost
+decided, to select from just such material, a representative for the
+Democratic Party in the coming contest; and today, what claims to be a
+majority of the Democracy of that State say that they have been cheated
+or they would have made that choice!"</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [This refers to Horatio Seymour, the Democratic Governor of New
+ York.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>After referring to the "insidious work" of the "Knights of the Golden
+Circle" in seeking "to corrupt the Army and destroy its efficiency;" the
+"riots and murders which," said he, "their agents are committing
+throughout the Loyal North, under the lead and guidance of the Party
+whose Representatives sit yonder across the aisle;" he continued: "and
+now, just as the time is coming on when we are to select a President for
+the next four years, one rises among them and fires the Beacon, throws
+up the blue-light&mdash;which will be seen, and rejoiced over, at the Rebel
+Capital in Richmond&mdash;as the signal that the Traitors in our camp are
+organized and ready for their hellish work! I believe the utterance of
+to-day is the uplifted banner of revolt. I ask you to mark the signal
+that blazes here, and see if there will not soon appear the answering
+signals of Traitors all over the Land. * * * If these men do mean to
+light the torch of War in all our homes; if they have resolved to begin
+the fearful work which will redden our streets, and this Capitol, with
+blood, the American People should know it at once, and prepare to meet
+it."</p>
+
+<p>At the close of Mr. Garfield's patriotic and eloquent remarks, Mr. Long
+again got the floor, declared that what he had said, he believed to be
+right, and he would "stand by it," though he had to "stand solitary and
+alone," and "even if it were necessary to brave bayonets, and prisons,
+and all the tyranny which may be imposed by the whole power and force of
+the Administration."</p>
+
+<p>Said he: "I have deliberately uttered my sentiments in that speech, and
+I will not retract one syllable of it." And, to "rub it in" a little
+stronger, he exclaimed, as he took his seat, just before adjournment:
+"Give me Liberty, even if confined to an Island of Greece, or a Canton
+of Switzerland, rather than an Empire and a Despotism as we have here
+to-day!"</p>
+
+<p>This treasonable speech naturally created much excitement throughout the
+Country.</p>
+
+<p>On the following day (Saturday, April 9, 1864), immediately after
+prayer, the reading of the Journal being dispensed with, the Speaker of
+the House (Colfax) came down from the Speaker's Chair, and, from the
+floor, offered a Preamble and Resolution, which ended thus:</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That Alexander Long, a Representative from the second
+district of Ohio, having, on the 8th day of April, 1864, declared
+himself in favor of recognizing the Independence and Nationality of the
+so-called Confederacy now in arms against the Union, and thereby 'given
+aid, Countenance and encouragement to persons engaged in armed hostility
+to the United States,' is hereby expelled."</p>
+
+<p>The debate which ensued consumed nearly a week, and every member of
+prominence, on both the Republican and Democratic sides, took part in
+it&mdash;the Democrats almost invariably being careful to protest their own
+loyalty, and yet attempting to justify the braver and more candid
+utterances of the accused member.</p>
+
+<p>Mr. Cox led off, April 9th, in the defense, by counterattack. He quoted
+remarks made to the House (March 18, 1864) by Mr. Julian, of Indiana, to
+the effect that "Our Country, united and Free, must be saved, at
+whatever hazard or cost; and nothing, not even the Constitution, must be
+allowed to hold back the uplifted arm of the Government in blasting the
+power of the Rebels forever;"&mdash;and upon this, adopting the language of
+another&mdash;[Judge Thomas, of Massachusetts.]&mdash;Mr. Cox declared that "to
+make this a War, with the sword in one hand to defend the Constitution,
+and a hammer in the other to break it to pieces, is no less treasonable
+than Secession itself; and that, outside the pale of the Constitution,
+the whole struggle is revolutionary."</p>
+
+<p>He thought, for such words as he had just quoted, Julian ought to have
+been expelled, if those of Long justified expulsion!</p>
+
+<p>Finally, being pressed by Julian to define his own position, as between
+the Life of the Nation, and the Infraction of the United States
+Constitution, Mr. Cox said: "I will say this, that UNDER NO
+CIRCUMSTANCES CONCEIVABLE BY THE HUMAN MIND WOULD I EVER VIOLATE THAT
+CONSTITUTION FOR ANY PURPOSE!"</p>
+
+<p>This sentiment was loudly applauded, and received with cries of "THAT IS
+IT!" "THAT'S IT!" by the Democratic side of the House, apparently in
+utter contempt for the express and emphatic declaration of Jefferson
+that: "A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the
+highest duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws
+of Necessity, of Self-preservation, of SAVING OUR COUNTRY WHEN IN
+DANGER, are of higher obligation. To LOSE OUR COUNTRY by a scrupulous
+adherence to written law WOULD BE TO LOSE THE LAW ITSELF, with Life,
+Liberty, Property, and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus
+absolutely SACRIFICING THE END TO THE MEANS."</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [In a letter to J. B. Colvin, Sept. 20, 1810, quoted at the time
+ for their information, and which may be found at page 542 of vol.
+ v., of Jefferson's Works.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Indeed these extreme sticklers for the letter of the Constitution, who
+would have sacrificed Country, kindred, friends, honesty, truth, and all
+ambitions on Earth and hopes for Heaven, rather than violate it&mdash;for
+that is what Mr. Cox's announcement and the Democratic endorsement of it
+meant, if they meant anything&mdash;were of the same stripe as those
+querulous Ancients, for the benefit of whom the Apostle wrote: "For THE
+LETTER KILLETH, but the Spirit giveth life."</p>
+
+<p>And now, inspired apparently by the reckless utterances
+of Long, if not by the more cautious diatribe of Cox, Harris of
+Maryland, determining if possible to outdo them all, not only declared
+that he was willing to go with his friend Long wherever the House chose
+to send him, but added: "I am a peace man, a radical peace man; and I am
+for Peace by the recognition of the South, for the recognition of the
+Southern Confederacy; and I am for acquiescence in the doctrine of
+Secession." And, said he, in the midst of the laughter which followed
+the sensation his treasonable words occasioned, "Laugh as you may, you
+have got to come to it!" And then, with that singular obfuscation of
+ideas engendered, in the heads of their followers, by the astute
+Rebel-sympathizing leaders, he went on:</p>
+
+<p>"I am for Peace, and I am for Union too. I am as good a Union man as
+any of you. [Laughter.] I am a better Union man than any of you!
+[Great Laughter.] * * * I look upon War as Disunion."</p>
+
+<p>After declaring that, if the principle of the expulsion Resolution was
+to be carried out, his "friend," Mr. Long, "would be a martyr in a
+glorious cause"&mdash;he proceeded to announce his own candidacy for
+expulsion, in the following terms:</p>
+
+<p>"Mr. Speaker, in the early part of this Secession movement, there was a
+Resolution offered, pledging men and money to carry on the War. My
+principles were then, and are now, against the War. I stood, solitary
+and alone, in voting against that Resolution, and whenever a similar
+proposition is brought here it will meet with my opposition. Not one
+dollar, nor one man, I swear, by the Eternal, will I vote for this
+infernal, this stupendous folly, more stupendous than ever disgraced any
+civilized People on the face of God's Earth. If that be Treason, make
+the most of it!</p>
+
+<p>"The South asked you to let them go in peace. But no, you said you
+would bring them into subjugation. That is not done yet, and God
+Almighty grant that it never may be. I hope that you will never
+subjugate the South. If she is to be ever again in the Union, I hope it
+will be with her own consent; and I hope that that consent will be
+obtained by some other mode than by the sword. 'If this be Treason,
+make the most of it!'"</p>
+
+<p>An extraordinary scene at once occurred&mdash;Mr. Tracy desiring "to know
+whether, in these Halls, the gentleman from Maryland invoked Almighty
+God that the American Arms should not prevail?" "Whether such language
+is not Treason?" and "whether it is in order to talk Treason in this
+Hall?"&mdash;his patriotic queries being almost drowned in the incessant
+cries of "Order!" "Order!" and great disorder, and confusion, on the
+Democratic side of the House.</p>
+
+<p>Finally the treasonable language was taken down by the Clerk, and, while
+a Resolution for the expulsion of Mr. Harris was being written out, Mr.
+Fernando Wood&mdash;coming, as he said, from a bed of "severe sickness,"
+quoted the language used by Mr. Long, to wit:</p>
+
+<p>"I now believe there are but two alternatives, and they are either the
+acknowledgment of the Independence of the South as an independent
+Nation, or their complete subjugation and extermination as a People; and
+of these alternatives I prefer the former"&mdash;and declared that "if he is
+to be expelled for the utterance of that sentiment, you may include me
+in it, because I concur fully in that sentiment."</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [He afterwards (April 11,) said he did not agree with Mr. Long's
+ opinions.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Every effort was unavailingly made by the Democrats, under the lead of
+Messrs. Cox&mdash;[In 1886 American Minister at Constantinople.]&mdash;and
+Pendleton,&mdash;[In 1886 American Minister at Berlin.]&mdash;to prevent action
+upon the new Resolution of expulsion, which was in these words:</p>
+
+<p>"Whereas, Hon. Benjamin G. Harris, a member of the House of
+Representatives of the United States from the State of Maryland, has on
+this day used the following language, to wit: 'The South asked you to
+let them go in peace. But no; you said you would bring them into
+subjection. That is not done yet, and God Almighty grant that it never
+may be. I hope that you will never subjugate the South.' And whereas,
+such language is treasonable, and is a gross disrespect of this House:
+Therefore, Be it Resolved, That the said Benjamin G. Harris be expelled
+from this House."</p>
+
+<p>Upon reaching a vote, however, the Resolution was lost, there being only
+81 yeas, to 58 (Democratic) nays&mdash;two-thirds not having voted
+affirmatively. Subsequently, despite Democratic efforts to obstruct, a
+Resolution, declaring Harris to be "an unworthy Member" of the House,
+and "severely" censuring him, was adopted.</p>
+
+<p>The debate upon the Long-expulsion Resolution now proceeded, and its
+mover, in view of the hopelessness of securing a two-thirds affirmative
+vote, having accepted an amendment comprising other two Resolutions and
+a Preamble, the question upon adopting these was submitted on the 14th
+of April. They were in the words following:</p>
+
+<p>"Whereas, ALEXANDER LONG, a Representative from the second district of
+Ohio, by his open declarations in the National Capitol, and publications
+in the City of New York, has shown himself to be in favor of a
+recognition of the so-called Confederacy now trying to establish itself
+upon the ruins of our Country, thereby giving aid and comfort to the
+Enemy in that destructive purpose&mdash;aid to avowed Traitors, in creating
+an illegal Government within our borders, comfort to them by assurances
+of their success and affirmations of the justice of their Cause; and
+whereas, such conduct is at the same time evidence of disloyalty, and
+inconsistent with his oath of office, and his duty as a Member of this
+Body: Therefore,</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That the said Alexander Long, a Representative from the
+second district of Ohio, be, and he is hereby declared to be an unworthy
+Member of the House of Representatives.</p>
+
+<p>"Resolved, That the Speaker shall read these Resolutions to the said
+Alexander Long during the session of the House."</p>
+
+<p>The first of these Resolutions was adopted, by 80 yeas to 69 nays; the
+second was tabled, by 71 yeas to 69 nays; and the Preamble was agreed
+to, by 78 yeas to 63 nays.</p>
+
+<p>And, among the 63 Democrats, who were not only unwilling to declare
+Alexander Long "an unworthy Member," or to have the Speaker read such a
+declaration to him in a session of the House, but also refused by their
+votes even to intimate that his conduct evidenced disloyalty, or gave
+aid and comfort to the Enemy, were the names of such democrats as Cox,
+Eldridge, Holman, Kernan, Morrisson, Pendleton, Samuel J. Randall,
+Voorhees, and Fernando Wood.</p>
+
+<p>Hence Mr. Long not only escaped expulsion for his treasonable
+utterances, but did not even receive the "severe censure" which, in
+addition to being declared (like himself) "an unworthy Member," had been
+voted to Mr. Harris for recklessly rushing into the breach to help him!</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [The Northern Democracy comprised two well-recognized classes: The
+ Anti-War (or Peace) Democrats, commonly called "Copperheads," who
+ sympathized with the Rebellion, and opposed the War for the Union;
+ and the War (or Union) Democrats, who favored a vigorous
+ prosecution of the War for the preservation of the Union.]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<br><br><br><br>
+<a name="ch26"></a>
+<br><br>
+<center>
+<h2>
+ CHAPTER XXVI.<br><br>
+
+ "THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT" DEFEATED IN THE HOUSE.
+
+</h2>
+</center>
+<br>
+
+<p>The debate in the House of Representatives, upon the Thirteenth
+Amendment to the Constitution&mdash;interrupted by the treasonable episode
+referred to in the last Chapter&mdash;was subsequently resumed.</p>
+
+<p>Meanwhile, however, Fort Pillow had been stormed, and its garrison of
+Whites and Blacks, massacred.</p>
+
+<p>And now commenced the beginning of the end&mdash;so far as the Military aspect
+of the Rebellion was concerned. Early in May, Sherman's Atlanta
+Campaign commenced, and, simultaneously, General Grant began his
+movement toward Richmond. In quick succession came the news of the
+bloody battles of the Wilderness, and those around Spottsylvania, Va.;
+at Buzzard Roost Gap, Snake Creek Gap, and Dalton, Ga.; Drury's Bluff,
+Va.; Resaca, Ga.; the battles of the North Anna, Va.; those around
+Dallas, and New Hope church, Ga; the crossing of Grant's forces to the
+South side of the James and the assault on Petersburg. While the Union
+Armies were thus valiantly attacking and beating those of the Rebels, on
+many a sanguinary field the loyal men of the North, both in and out of
+Congress, pressed for favorable action upon the Thirteenth Amendment.
+"Friends of the wounded in Fredericksburg from the Battle of the
+Wilderness"&mdash;exclaimed Horace Greeley in the New York Tribune, of May
+31st,&mdash;"friends and relatives of the soldiers of Grant's Army beyond the
+Wilderness, let us all join hands and swear upon our Country's altar
+that we will never cease this War until African Slavery in the United
+States is dead forever, and forever buried!"</p>
+
+<p>Peace Democrats, however, were deaf to all such entreaties. On the very
+same day, Mr. Holman, in the House, objected even to the second reading
+of the Joint Resolution Amendatory of the Constitution, and there were
+so many "Peace Democrats" to back him, that the vote was: 55 yeas to 76
+nays, on the question "shall the Joint Resolution be rejected!"</p>
+
+<p>The old cry, that had been repeated by Hendricks and others, in the
+Senate and House, time and again, was still used&mdash;threadbare though it
+was&mdash;"this is not the right time for it!" On this very day, for
+instance, Mr. Herrick said: "I ask if this is the proper time for our
+People to consider so grave a measure as the Amendment of the
+Constitution in so vital a point? * * * this is no fitting time for
+such work."</p>
+
+<p>Very different was the attitude of Kellogg, of New York, and well did he
+show up the depths to which the Democracy&mdash;the Peace Democracy&mdash;had now
+fallen. "We are told," said he, "of a War Democracy, and such there
+are&mdash;their name is legion&mdash;good men and true; they are found in the
+Union ranks bearing arms in support of the Government and the
+Administration that wields it. At the ballot-box, whether at home or in
+the camp, they are Union men, and vote as they fight, and hold little in
+common with the political leaders of the Democratic Party in or out of
+this Hall&mdash;the Seymours, the Woods, the Vallandighams, the Woodwards,
+and their indorsers, who hold and control the Democratic Party here, and
+taint it with Treason, till it is a stench in the nostrils of all
+patriotic men."</p>
+
+<p>After referring to the fact that the leaders of the Rebellion had from
+the start relied confidently upon assistance from the Northern
+Democracy, he proceeded:</p>
+
+<p>"The Peace Democracy, and mere Party-hacks in the North, are fulfilling
+their masters' expectations industriously, unceasingly, and as far as in
+them lies. Not even the shouts for victory, in these Halls, can divert
+their Southern allies here. A sullen gloom at the defeat and
+discomfiture of their Southern brethren settles down on their disastrous
+countenances, from which no ray of joy can be reflected. * * * They
+even vote solid against a law to punish guerrillas.</p>
+
+<p>"Sir," continued he, "in my judgment, many of those who withhold from
+their Country the support they would otherwise give, find allegiance to
+Party too strong for their patriotism. * * * Rejecting the example and
+counsels of Stanton and Dickinson and Butler and Douglas and Dix and
+Holt and Andrew Johnson and Logan and Rosecrans and Grant and a host of
+others, all Democrats of the straightest sect, to forget all other ties,
+and cleave only to their Country for their Country's sake, and rejecting
+the overtures and example of the Republican Party to drop and forget
+their Party name, that all might unite and band together for their
+Country's salvation as Union men, they turn a deaf ear and cold
+shoulder, and sullenly pass by on the other side, thanking God they are
+not as other men are, and lend, if at all, a calculating, qualified, and
+conditional and halting support, under protest, to their Country's
+cause; thus justifying the only hope of the Rebellion to-day, that Party
+spirit at the North will distract its counsels, divide and discourage
+and palsy its efforts, and ultimately make way for the Traitor and the
+parricide to do their worst."</p>
+
+<p>Besides the set speeches made against the proposed
+Constitutional amendment in the House, Peace-Democrats of the Senate
+continued to keep up a running fire at it in that Chamber, on every
+possible occasion. Garrett Davis was especially garrulous on the
+subject, and also launched the thunders of his wrath at the President
+quite frequently and even vindictively. For instance, speaking in the
+Senate&mdash;[May 31,1864,]&mdash;of the right of Property in Slaves; said he:</p>
+
+<p>"This new-born heresy 'Military Necessity,' as President Lincoln claims,
+and exercises it, is the sum of all political and Military villianies * *
+* and it is no less absurd than it is villianous. * * * The man has
+never spoken or lived who can prove by any provision of the
+Constitution, or by any principle, or by any argument to be deduced
+logically and fairly from it, that he has any such power as this vast,
+gigantic, all-conquering and all-crushing power of Military Necessity
+which he has the audacity to claim.</p>
+
+<p>"This modern Emperor, this Tiberius, a sort of a Tiberius, and his
+Sejanus, a sort of a Sejanus, the head of the War Department, are
+organizing daily their Military Courts to try civilians. * * *</p>
+
+<p>"Sir, I want one labor of love before I die. I want the President of
+the United States, I want his Secretary of War, I want some of his high
+officers in Military command to bring a civilian to a Military
+execution, and me to have the proud privilege of prosecuting them for
+murder. * * * I want the law and its just retribution to be visited
+upon these great delinquents.</p>
+
+<p>"I would sooner, if I had the power, bring about such an atonement as
+that, than I would even put down the Rebellion. It would be a greater
+victory in favor of Freedom and Constitutional Liberty, a thousand-fold,
+of all the People of America besides, than the subjugation of the Rebel
+States could possibly be."</p>
+
+<p>But there seemed to be no end to the' attacks upon the Administration,
+made, in both Houses, by these peculiar Peace-Democrats. Union blood
+might flow in torrents on the fields of the rebellious South, atrocities
+innumerable might be committed by the Rebels, cold-blooded massacres of
+Blacks and Whites, as at Fort Pillow, might occur without rebuke from
+them; but let the Administration even dare to sneeze, and&mdash;woe to the
+Administration.</p>
+
+<p>It was not the Thirteenth Amendment only, that they assailed, but
+everything else which the Administration thought might help it in its
+effort to put down the Rebellion. Nor was it so much their malignant
+activity in opposition to any one measure intended to strengthen the
+hands of the Union, but to all such measures; and superadded to this was
+the incessant bringing forward, in both Houses of Congress, by these
+restless Rebel-sympathizers, of Peace-Resolutions, the mere presentation
+of which would be, and were, construed by the Rebel authorities at
+Richmond, as evidences of a weakening.</p>
+
+<p>Even some of the best of the Peace-Democrats, like S. S. Cox, for
+instance, not only assailed the Tariff&mdash;under which the Union Republican
+Party sought to protect and build up American Industry, as well as to
+raise as much revenue as possible to help meet the enormous current
+expenditures of the Government&mdash;but also denounced our great paper-money
+system, which alone enabled us to secure means to meet all deficiencies
+in the revenues otherwise obtained, and thus to ultimately conquer the
+hosts of Rebellion.</p>
+
+<p>He declared (June 2, 1864) that "The People are the victims of the
+joint-robbery of a system of bounties under the guise of duties, and of
+an inconvertible and depreciated paper currency under the guise of
+money," and added: "No man is now so wise and gifted that he can save
+this Nation from bankruptcy. * * * No borrowing system can save us.
+The scheme of making greenbacks a legal tender, which enabled the debtor
+to cheat his creditor, thereby playing the old game of kingcraft, to
+debase the currency in order to aid the designs of despotism, may float
+us for a while amidst the fluctuations and bubbles of the day; but as no
+one possesses the power to repeal the Law of the Almighty, which decrees
+(and as our Constitution has established) that gold and silver shall be
+the standard of value in the World, so they will ever thus remain,
+notwithstanding the legislation of Congress."</p>
+
+<p>Not satisfied with this sort of "fire in the rear," it was attempted by
+means of Democratic Free-Trade and antipaper-currency sophistries, to
+arouse jealousies, heart-burnings and resentful feelings in the breasts
+of those living in different parts of the Union&mdash;to implant bitter
+Sectional antagonisms and implacable resentments between the Eastern
+States, on the one hand, and the Western States, on the other&mdash;and thus,
+by dividing, to weaken the Loyal Union States.</p>
+
+<p>That this was the cold-blooded purpose of all who pursued this course,
+would no doubt be warmly denied by some of them; but the fact remains no
+less clear, that the effect of that course, whether so intended or not,
+was to give aid and comfort to the Enemy at that critical time when the
+Nation most needed all the men, money, and moral as well as material
+support, it was possible to get, to put an end to the bloody Rebellion,
+now&mdash;under the continuous poundings of Grant's Army upon that of Lee in
+Virginia, and the advance of Sherman's Army upon that of Johnston in
+Georgia&mdash;tottering to its overthrow. Thus this same speaker (S. S. Cox),
+in his untimely speech, undertook to divide the Union-loving States
+"into two great classes: the Protected States and the Unprotected
+States;" and&mdash;having declared that "The Manufacturing States, mainly the
+New England States and Pennsylvania, are the Protected States," and "The
+Agricultural States," mainly the eleven Western States, which he named,
+"are the Unprotected States"&mdash;proceeded to intemperately and violently
+arraign New England, and especially Massachusetts, in the same way that
+had years before been adopted by the old Conspirators of the South when
+they sought&mdash;alas, too successfully!&mdash;to inflame the minds of Southern
+citizens to a condition of unreasoning frenzy which made attempted
+Nullification and subsequent armed Rebellion and Secession possible.</p>
+
+<p>Well might the thoroughly loyal Grinnell, of Iowa&mdash;after exposing what
+he termed the "sophistry of figures" by which Mr. Cox had seen fit "to
+misrepresent and traduce" the Western States&mdash;exclaim: "Sir, I have no
+words which I can use to execrate sufficiently such language, in
+arraying the Sections in opposition during a time of War; as if we were
+not one People, descended from one stock, having one interest, and bound
+up in one destiny!"</p>
+
+<p>The damage that might have been done to the Union Cause by such
+malignant Democratic attacks upon the National unity and strength, may
+be imagined when we reflect that at this very time the annual expenses
+of our Government were over $600,000,000, and growing still larger; and
+that $1.90 in legal tender notes of the United States was worth but
+$1.00 in gold, with a downward tendency. Said stern old Thaddeus
+Stevens, alluding on this occasion, to Statesmanship of the peculiar
+stamp of the Coxes and Fernando Woods: "He who in this time will pursue
+such a course of argument for the mere sake of party, can never hope to
+be ranked among Statesmen; nay, Sir, he will not even rise to the
+dignity of a respectable Demagogue!"</p>
+
+<p>Within a week after this, (June 9, 1864), we find in the Senate also,
+similarly insidious attacks upon the strength of the Government, made by
+certain Northern Democrats, who never tired of undermining Loyalty, and
+creating and spreading discontent among the People. The Bill then up,
+for consideration, was one "to prohibit the discharge of persons from
+liability to Military duty, by reason of the payment of money."</p>
+
+<p>In the terribly bloody Campaign that had now been entered upon by Grant
+&mdash;in the West, under Sherman, and in the East, under his own personal
+eye&mdash;it was essential to send to the front, every man possible. Hence
+the necessity for a Bill of this sort, which moreover provided, in order
+as far as possible to popularize conscription, that all calls for drafts
+theretofore made under the Enrolling Act of March 3, 1863, should be for
+not over one year's service, etc.</p>
+
+<p>This furnished the occasion for Mr. Hendricks, among other Peace
+Democrats, to make opposing speeches. He, it seems, had all along been
+opposed to drafting Union soldiers; and because, during the previous
+Winter, the Senate had been unwilling to abolish the clause permitting a
+drafted man to pay a commutation of $300 (with which money a substitute
+could be procured) instead of himself going, at a time when men were not
+quite so badly needed as now, therefore Mr. Hendricks pretended to think
+it very strange and unjustifiable that now, when everything depended on
+getting every possible man in the field, the Senate should think of
+"abandoning that which it thought right last Winter!"</p>
+
+<p>He opposed drafting; but if drafting must be resorted to, then he
+thought that what he termed "the Horror of the Draft" should be felt by
+as many of the Union people as possible!&mdash;or, in his own words: "the
+Horror of the Draft ought to be divided among the People." As if this
+were not sufficient to conjure dreadful imaginings, he added: "if one
+set of men are drafted this year to serve twelve months, and they have
+to go because the power of the Government makes them go, whether they
+can go well or not, then at the end of the year their neighbors should
+be subjected to the same Horror, and let this dreadful demand upon the
+service, upon the blood, and upon the life of the People be distributed
+upon all."</p>
+
+<p>And, in order apparently to still further intensify public feeling
+against all drafting, and sow the seeds of dissatisfaction in the hearts
+of those drafted at this critical time, when the fate of the Union and
+of Republican Government palpably depended upon conscription, he added:
+"It is not so right to say to twenty men in a neighborhood: 'You shall
+go; you shall leave your families whether you can or not; you shall go
+without the privilege of commutation whether you leave starving wives
+and children behind you or not,' and then say to every other man of the
+neighborhood: 'Because we have taken these twenty men for three years,
+you shall remain with your wives and children safely and comfortably at
+home for these three years.' I like this feature of the amendment,
+because it distributes the Horror of the Draft more equally and justly
+over the whole People."</p>
+
+<p>Not satisfied with rolling the "Horror of the Draft" so often and
+trippingly over his tongue, he also essayed the role of Prophet in the
+interest of the tottering god of Slavery. "The People," said he,
+"expect great results from this Campaign; and when another year comes
+rolling around, and it is found that this War is not closed, and that
+there is no reasonable probability of its early close, my colleague
+(Lane) and other Senators who agree with him will find that the People
+will say that this effusion of blood must stop; that THERE MUST BE SOME
+ADJUSTMENT. I PROPHESY THIS."</p>
+
+<p>And, as a further declaration likely to give aid and comfort to the
+Rebel leaders, he said: "I do not believe many men are going to be
+obtained by a draft; I do not believe a very good Army will be got by a
+draft; I do not believe an Army will be put in the field, by a draft,
+that will whip General Lee."</p>
+
+<p>But while all such statements were, no doubt, intended to help the foes
+of the Union, and dishearten or dismay its friends, the really loyal
+People, understanding their fell object, paid little heed to them. The
+predictions of these Prophets of evil fell flat upon the ears of lovers
+of their Country. Conspirators, however much they might masquerade in
+the raiment of Loyalty, could not wholly conceal the ear-marks of
+Treason. The hand might be the hand of Esau, but the voice was the
+voice of Jacob.</p>
+
+<p>On the 8th of June&mdash;after a month of terrific and bloody fighting
+between the immediate forces of Grant and Lee&mdash;a dispatch from Sherman,
+just received at Washington, was read to the House of Representatives,
+which said: "The Enemy is not in our immediate front, but his signals
+are seen at Lost Mountain, and Kenesaw." So, at the same time, at the
+National Capital, while the friends of the Union there, were not
+immediately confronted with an armed Enemy, yet the signals of his
+Allies could be seen, and their fire upon our rear could be heard, daily
+and almost hourly, both in the Senate and the House of Representatives.</p>
+
+<p>The fight in the House, upon the Thirteenth Amendment, now seemed
+indeed, to be reaching a climax. During the whole of June 14th, until
+midnight, speech after speech on the subject, followed each other in
+rapid succession. Among the opposition speeches, perhaps those of
+Fernando Wood and Holman were most notable for extravagant and
+unreasoning denunciation of the Administration and Party in power&mdash;whose
+every effort was put forth, and strained at this very time to the
+utmost, to save the Union.</p>
+
+<p>Holman, for instance, declared that, "Of all the measures of this
+disastrous Administration, each in its turn producing new calamities,
+this attempt to tamper with the Constitution threatens the most
+permanent injury." He enumerated the chief measures of the
+Administration during its three and a half years of power&mdash;among them the
+Emancipation Proclamation, the arming of the Blacks, and what he
+sneeringly termed "their pet system of finance" which was to "sustain
+the public credit for infinite years," but which "even now," said he,
+"totters to its fall!" And then, having succeeded in convincing himself
+of Republican failure, he exultingly exclaimed: "But why enumerate?
+What measure of this Administration has failed to be fatal! Every step
+in your progress has been a mistake. I use the mildest terms of
+censure!"</p>
+
+<p>Fernando Wood, in his turn also, "mildly" remarked upon Republican
+policy as "the bloody and brutal policy of the Administration Party."
+He considered this "the crisis of the fate of the Union;" declared that
+Slavery was "the best possible condition to insure the happiness of the
+Negro race"&mdash;a position which, on the following day, he
+"reaffirmed"&mdash;and characterized those members of the Democratic Party who saw Treason
+in the ways and methods and expressions of Peace Democrats of his own
+stamp, as a "pack of political jackals known as War Democrats."</p>
+
+<p>On the 15th of June, Farnsworth made a reply to Ross&mdash;who had claimed to
+be friendly to the Union soldier&mdash;in which the former handled the
+Democratic Party without gloves. "What," said he, referring to Mr.
+Ross, "has been the course of that gentleman and his Party on this floor
+in regard to voting supplies to the Army? What has been their course in
+regard to raising money to pay the Army? His vote will be found
+recorded in almost every instance against the Appropriation Bills,
+against ways and means for raising money to pay the Army. It is only a
+week ago last Monday, that a Bill was introduced here to punish
+guerrillas * * * and how did my colleague vote? Against the Bill.* * *
+On the subject of arming Slaves, of putting Negroes into the Army, how
+has my colleague and his Party voted? Universally against it. They
+would strip from the backs of these Black soldiers, now in the service
+of the Country, their uniforms, and would send them back to Slavery with
+chains and manacles. And yet they are the friends of the soldier!"* * *
+"On the vote to repeal the Fugitive Slave Law, how did that (Democratic)
+side of the House vote? Does not the Fugitive Slave Law affect the
+Black soldier in the Army who was a Slave? That side of the House are
+in favor of continuing the Fugitive Slave Law, and of disbanding Colored
+troops. How did that side of the House vote on the question of arming
+Slaves and paying them as soldiers? They voted against it. They are in
+favor of disbanding the Colored regiments, and, armed with the Fugitive
+Slave Law, sending them back to their masters!"</p>
+
+<p>He took occasion also to meet various Democratic arguments against the
+Resolution,&mdash;among them, one, hinging on the alleged right of Property
+in Slaves. This was a favorite idea with the Border-State men
+especially, that Slaves were Property&mdash;mere chattels as it were,&mdash;and,
+only the day before, a Northern man, Coffroth of Pennsylvania, had said:</p>
+
+<p>"Sir, we should pause before proceeding any further in this
+Unconstitutional and censurable legislation. The mere abolition of
+Slavery is not my cause of complaint. I care not whether Slavery is
+retained or abolished by the people of the States in which it
+exists&mdash;the only rightful authority. The question to me is, has Congress a
+right to take from the people of the South their Property; or, in other
+words, having no pecuniary interest therein, are we justified in freeing
+the Slave-property of others? Can we Abolish Slavery in the Loyal State
+of Kentucky against her will? If this Resolution should pass, and be
+ratified by three-fourths of the States&mdash;States already Free&mdash;and
+Kentucky refuses to ratify it, upon what principle of right or law would
+we be justified in taking this Slave-property of the people of Kentucky?
+Would it be less than stealing?"</p>
+
+<p>And Farnsworth met this idea&mdash;which had also been advanced by Messrs.
+Ross, Fernando Wood, and Pruyn&mdash;by saying: "What constitutes property?
+I know it is said by some gentlemen on the other side, that what the
+statute makes property, is property. I deny it. What 'vested right'
+has any man or State in Property in Man? We of the North hold property,
+not by virtue of statute law, not by virtue of enactments. Our property
+consists in lands, in chattels, in things. Our property was made
+property by Jehovah when He gave Man dominion over it. But nowhere did
+He give dominion of Man over Man. Our title extends back to the
+foundation of the World. That constitutes property. There is where we
+get our title. There is where we get our 'vested rights' to property."</p>
+
+<p>Touching the ethics of Slavery, Mr. Arnold's speech on the same occasion
+was also able, and in parts eloquent, as where he said: 'Slavery is
+to-day an open enemy striking at the heart of the Republic. It is the soul
+and body, the spirit and motive of the Rebellion. It is Slavery which
+marshals yonder Rebel hosts, which confront the patriot Armies of Grant
+and Sherman. It is the savage spirit of this barbarous Institution
+which starves the Union prisoners at Richmond, which assassinates them
+at Fort Pillow, which murders the wounded on the field of battle, and
+which fills up the catalogue of wrong and outrage which mark the conduct
+of the Rebels during all this War.</p>
+
+<p>"In view of all the long catalogue of wrongs which Slavery has inflicted
+upon the Country, I demand to-day, of the Congress of the United States,
+the death of African Slavery. We can have no permanent Peace, while
+Slavery lives. It now reels and staggers toward its last death-struggle.
+Let us strike the monster this last decisive blow."</p>
+
+<p>And, after appealing to both Border-State men, and Democrats of the Free
+States, not to stay the passage of this Resolution which "will strike
+the Rebellion at the heart," he continued: "Gentlemen may flatter
+themselves with a restoration of the Slave-power in this Country. 'The
+Union as it was!' It is a dream, never again to be realized. The
+America of the past, has gone forever. A new Nation is to be born from
+the agony through which the People are now passing. This new Nation is
+to be wholly Free. Liberty, Equality before the Law, is to be the great
+Corner-stone."</p>
+
+<p>So, too, Mr. Ingersoll eloquently said&mdash;among many other good
+things:&mdash;"It is well to eradicate an evil. That Slavery is an evil, no sane,
+honest man will deny. It has been the great curse of this Country from
+its infancy to the present hour, And now that the States in Rebellion
+have given the Loyal States the opportunity to take off that curse, to
+wipe away the foul stain, I say let it be done. We owe it to ourselves;
+we owe it to posterity; we owe it to the Slaves themselves to
+exterminate Slavery forever by the adoption of the proposed Amendment to
+the Constitution. * * * I believe Slavery is the mother of this
+Rebellion, that this Rebellion can be attributed to no other cause but
+Slavery; from that it derived its life, and gathers its strength to-day.
+Destroy the mother, and the child dies. Destroy the cause, and the
+effect will disappear.</p>
+
+<p>"Slavery has ever been the enemy of liberal principles. It has ever
+been the friend of ignorance, prejudice, and all the unlawful, savage,
+and detestable passions which proceed therefrom. It has ever been
+domineering, arrogant, exacting, and overbearing. It has claimed to be
+a polished aristocrat, when in reality it has only been a coarse,
+swaggering, and brutal boor. It has ever claimed to be a gentleman,
+when in reality it has ever been a villain. I think it is high time to
+clip its overgrown pretensions, strip it of its mask, and expose it, in
+all its hideous deformity, to the detestation of all honest and
+patriotic men."</p>
+
+<p>After Mr. Samuel J. Randall had, at a somewhat later hour, pathetically
+and poetically invoked the House, in its collective unity, as a
+"Woodman," to "spare that tree" of the Constitution, and to "touch not a
+single bough," because, among other reasons, "in youth it sheltered"
+him; and furthermore, because "the time" was "most inopportune;" and,
+after Mr. Rollins, of Missouri, had made a speech, which he afterward
+suppressed; Mr. Pendleton closed the debate in an able effort, from his
+point of view, in which he objected to the passage of the Joint
+Resolution because "the time is not auspicious;" because, said he, "it
+is impossible that the Amendment proposed, should be ratified without a
+fraudulent use of the power to admit new States, or a fraudulent use of
+the Military power of the Federal Government in the Seceded
+States,"&mdash;and, said he, "if you should attempt to amend the Constitution by such
+means, what binding obligation would it have?"</p>
+
+<p>He objected, also, because "the States cannot, under the pretense of
+amending the Constitution, subvert the structure, spirit, and theory of
+this Government." "But," said he, "if this Amendment were within the
+Constitutional power of amendment; if this were a proper time to
+consider it; if three-fourths of the States were willing to ratify it;
+and if it did not require the fraudulent use of power, either in this
+House or in the Executive Department, to secure its adoption, I would
+still resist the passage of this Resolution. It is another step toward
+consolidation, and consolidation is Despotism; confederation is
+Liberty."</p>
+
+<p>It was about 4 o'clock in the afternoon of June 15th, that the House
+came to a vote, on the passage of the Joint Resolution. At first the
+strain of anxiety on both sides was great, but, as the roll proceeded,
+it soon became evident that the Resolution was doomed to defeat. And so
+it transpired. The vote stood 93 yeas, to 65 nays&mdash;Mr. Ashley having
+changed his vote, from the affirmative to the negative, for the purpose
+of submitting, at the proper time, a motion to reconsider.</p>
+
+<p>That same evening, Mr. Ashley made the motion to reconsider the vote by
+which the proposed Constitutional Amendment was rejected; and the motion
+was duly entered in the Journal, despite the persistent efforts of
+Messrs. Cox, Holman, and others, to prevent it.</p>
+
+<p>On the 28th of June, just prior to the Congressional Recess, Mr. Ashley
+announced that he had been disappointed in the hope of securing enough
+votes from the Democratic side of the House to carry the Amendment.
+"Those," said he, "who ought to have been the champions of this great
+proposition are unfortunately its strongest opponents. They have
+permitted the golden opportunity to pass. The record is made up, and we
+must go to the Country on this issue thus presented." And then he gave
+notice that he would call the matter up, at the earliest possible moment
+after the opening of the December Session of Congress.</p>
+
+<br><br><br><br>
+<a name="ch27"></a>
+<br><br>
+<center>
+<h2>
+ CHAPTER XXVII.<br><br>
+
+ SLAVERY DOOMED AT THE POLLS.
+
+</h2>
+</center>
+<br>
+
+<p>The record was indeed made up, and the issue thus made, between Slavery
+and Freedom, would be the chief one before the People. Already the
+Republican National Convention, which met at Baltimore, June 7, 1864,
+had not only with "enthusiastic unanimity," renominated Mr. Lincoln for
+the Presidency, but amid "tremendous applause," the delegates rising and
+waving their hats&mdash;had adopted a platform which declared, in behalf of
+that great Party: "That, as Slavery was the cause, and now constitutes
+the strength, of this Rebellion, and as it must be, always and
+everywhere, hostile to the principles of Republican government, Justice
+and the National safety demand its utter and complete extirpation from
+the soil of the Republic; and that while we uphold and maintain the Acts
+and Proclamations by which the Government, in its own defense, has aimed
+a death-blow at this gigantic evil, we are in favor, furthermore, of
+such an Amendment to the Constitution, to be made by the People in
+conformity with its provisions, as shall terminate and forever prohibit
+the existence of Slavery within the limits or the jurisdiction of the
+United States."</p>
+
+<p>So, too, with vociferous plaudits, had they received and adopted another
+Resolution, wherein they declared "That we approve and applaud the
+practical wisdom, the unselfish patriotism and the unswerving fidelity
+to the Constitution and the principles of American Liberty, with which
+Abraham Lincoln has discharged, under circumstances of unparalleled
+difficulty, the great duties and responsibilities of the Presidential
+Office; that we approve and endorse, as demanded by the emergency, and
+essential to the preservation of the Nation, and as within the
+provisions of the Constitution; the Measures and Acts which he has
+adopted to defend the Nation against its open and secret foes; that we
+approve, especially, the Proclamation of Emancipation, and the
+employment, as Union soldiers, of men heretofore held in Slavery; and
+that we have full confidence in his determination to carry these and all
+other Constitutional Measures essential to the salvation of the Country,
+into full and complete effect."</p>
+
+<p>Thus heartily, thoroughly and unreservedly, endorsed in all the great
+acts of his Administration&mdash;and even more emphatically, if possible, in
+his Emancipation policy&mdash;by the unanimous vote of his Party, Mr.
+Lincoln, although necessarily "chagrined and disappointed"
+by the House-vote which had defeated the Thirteenth Amendment, might well feel
+undismayed. He always had implicit faith in the People; he felt sure
+that they would sustain him; and this done, why could not the votes of a
+dozen, out of the seventy Congressional Representatives opposing that
+Amendment, be changed? Even failing in this, it must be but a question
+of time. He thought he could afford to bide that time.</p>
+
+<p>On the 29th of August, the Democratic National Convention met at
+Chicago. Horatio Seymour was its permanent President; that same
+Governor of New York whom the 4th of July, 1863, almost at the moment
+when Vicksburg and Gettysburg had brought great encouragement to the
+Union cause, and when public necessity demanded the enforcement of the
+Draft in order to drive the Rebel invader from Northern soil and bring
+the Rebellion speedily to an end&mdash;had threateningly said to the
+Republicans, in the course of a public speech, during the Draft-riots at
+New York City: "Remember this, that the bloody, and treasonable, and
+revolutionary doctrine of public necessity can be proclaimed by a mob as
+well as by a Government. * * * When men accept despotism, they may have
+a choice as to who the despot shall be!"</p>
+
+<p>In his speech to this Democratic-Copperhead National Convention,
+therefore, it is not surprising that he should, at this time, declare
+that "this Administration cannot now save this Union, if it would."
+That the body which elected such a presiding officer,&mdash;after the bloody
+series of glorious Union victories about Atlanta, Ga., then fast leading
+up to the fall of that great Rebel stronghold, (which event actually
+occurred long before most of these Democratic delegates, on their
+return, could even reach their homes)&mdash;should adopt a Resolution
+declaring that the War was a "failure," was not surprising either.</p>
+
+<p>That Resolution&mdash;"the material resolution of the Chicago platform," as
+Vallandigham afterward characters it, was written and "carried through
+both the Subcommittee and the General Committee" by that Arch-Copperhead
+and Conspirator himself.&mdash;[See his letter of October 22, 1864, to the
+editor of the New York News,]</p>
+
+<p>It was in these words: "Resolved, That this Convention does explicitly
+declare as the sense of the American People, that after four years of
+failure to restore the Union by the experiment of War, during which,
+under the pretense of a military necessity, or War&mdash;power higher than the
+Constitution, the Constitution itself has been disregarded in every
+part, and public Liberty and private right alike trodden down and the
+material prosperity of the Country essentially impaired&mdash;Justice,
+Humanity, Liberty, and the public welfare demand that immediate efforts
+be made for a cessation of hostilities, with a view to an ultimate
+Convention of the States, or other peaceable means, to the end that at
+the earliest practicable moment Peace may be restored on the basis of
+the Federal Union of the States."</p>
+
+<p>With a Copperhead platform, this Democratic Convention thought it
+politic to have a Union candidate for the Presidency. Hence, the
+nomination of General McClellan; but to propitiate the out-and-out
+Vallandigham Peace men, Mr. Pendleton was nominated to the second place
+on the ticket.</p>
+
+<p>This combination was almost as great a blunder as was the platform&mdash;than
+which nothing could have been worse. Farragut's Naval victory at
+Mobile, and Sherman's capture of Atlanta, followed so closely upon the
+adjournment of the Convention as to make its platform and candidates the
+laughing stock of the Nation; and all the efforts of Democratic orators,
+and of McClellan himself, in his letter of acceptance, could not prevent
+the rise of that great tidal wave of Unionism which was soon to engulf
+the hosts of Copperhead-Democracy.</p>
+
+<p>The Thanksgiving-services in the churches, and the thundering salutes of
+100 guns from every Military and Naval post in the United States, which
+&mdash;during the week succeeding that Convention's sitting&mdash;betokened the
+Nation's especial joy and gratitude to the victorious Union Forces of
+Sherman and Farragut for their fortuitously-timed demonstration that the
+"experiment of War" for the restoration of the Union was anything but a
+"Failure" all helped to add to the proportions of that rapidly-swelling
+volume of loyal public feeling.</p>
+
+<p>The withdrawal from the canvass, of General Fremont, nominated for the
+Presidency by the "radical men of the Nation," at Cleveland, also
+contributed to it. In his letter of withdrawal, September 17th, he
+said:</p>
+
+<p>"The Presidential contest has, in effect, been entered upon in such a
+way that the union of the Republican Party has become a paramount
+necessity. The policy of the Democratic Party signifies either
+separation, or reestablishment with Slavery. The Chicago platform is
+simply separation. General McClellan's letter of acceptance is
+reestablishment, with Slavery. The Republican candidate is, on the
+contrary, pledged to the reestablishment of the Union without Slavery;
+and, however hesitating his policy may be, the pressure of his Party
+will, we may hope, force him to it. Between these issues, I think no
+man of the Liberal Party can remain in doubt."</p>
+
+<p>And now, following the fall of Atlanta before Sherman's Forces, Grant
+had stormed "Fort Hell," in front of Petersburg; Sheridan had routed the
+Rebels, under Early, at Winchester, and had again defeated Early at
+Fisher's Hill; Lee had been repulsed in his attack on Grant's works at
+Petersburg; and Allatoona had been made famous, by Corse and his 2,000
+Union men gallantly repulsing the 5,000 men of Hood's Rebel Army, who
+had completely surrounded and attacked them in front, flank, and rear.</p>
+
+<p>All these Military successes for the Union Cause helped the Union
+political campaign considerably, and, when supplemented by the
+remarkable results of the October elections in Pennsylvania, Indiana,
+and Maryland, made the election of Lincoln and Johnson a foregone
+conclusion.</p>
+
+<p>The sudden death of Chief-Justice Taney, too, happening, by a strange
+coincidence, simultaneously with the triumph of the Union Party of
+Maryland in carrying the new Constitution of that State, which
+prohibited Slavery within her borders, seemed to have a significance*
+not without its effect upon the public mind, now fast settling down to
+the belief that Slavery everywhere upon the soil of the United States
+must die.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [Greeley well said of it: "His death, at this moment, seemed to
+ mark the transition from the Era of Slavery to that of Universal
+ Freedom."]</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>Then came, October 19th, the Battle of Cedar Creek, Va. where the Rebel
+General Early, during Sheridan's absence, surprised and defeated the
+latter's forces, until Sheridan, riding down from Winchester, turned
+defeat into victory for the Union Arms, and chased the armed Rebels out
+of the Shenandoah Valley forever; and the fights of October 27th and
+28th, to the left of Grant's position, at Petersburg, by which the
+railroad communications of Lee's Army at Richmond were broken up.</p>
+
+<p>At last, November 8, 1864, dawned the eventful day of election. By
+midnight of that date it was generally believed, all over the Union,
+that Lincoln and Johnson were overwhelmingly elected, and that the Life
+as well as Freedom of the Nation had thus been saved by the People.</p>
+
+<p>Late that very night, President Lincoln was serenaded by a Pennsylvania
+political club, and, in responding to the compliment, modestly said:</p>
+
+<p>"I earnestly believe that the consequences of this day's work (if it be
+as you assure, and as now seems probable) will be to the lasting
+advantage, if not to the very salvation, of the Country. I cannot at
+this hour say what has been the result of the election. But whatever it
+may be, I have no desire to modify this opinion, that all who have
+labored to-day in behalf of the Union organization have wrought for the
+best interests of their Country and the World, not only for the present
+but for all future ages.</p>
+
+<p>"I am thankful to God," continued he, "for this approval of the People;
+but, while deeply gratified for this mark of their confidence in me, if
+I know my heart, my gratitude is free from any taint of personal
+triumph. I do not impugn the motives of any one opposed to me. It is
+no pleasure to me to triumph over any one; but I give thanks to the
+Almighty for this evidence of the People's resolution to stand by Free
+Government and the rights of Humanity."</p>
+
+<p>On the 10th of November, in response to another serenade given at the
+White House, in the presence of an immense and jubilantly enthusiastic
+gathering of Union men, by the Republican clubs of the District of
+Columbia, Mr. Lincoln said:</p>
+
+<p>"It has long been a grave question whether any Government, not too
+strong for the Liberties of its People, can be strong enough to maintain
+its existence in great emergencies. On this point the present
+Rebellion has brought our Republic to a severe test, and a
+Presidential election, occurring in regular course during the Rebellion,
+has added not a little to the strain. * * * But the election, along
+with its incidental and undesired strife, has done good, too. It has
+demonstrated that a People's Government can sustain a National election
+in the midst of a great Civil War, until now it has not been known to
+the World that this was a possibility. It shows, also, how sound and
+how strong we still are.</p>
+
+<p>"But," said he, "the Rebellion continues; and now that the election is
+over, may not all having a common interest reunite in a common effort to
+save our common Country?</p>
+
+<p>"For my own part," continued he&mdash;as the cheering, elicited by this
+forcible appeal, ceased&mdash;"I have striven, and shall strive, to avoid
+placing any obstacle in the way. So long as I have been here I have not
+willingly planted a thorn in any man's bosom. While I am deeply
+sensible to the high compliment of a reelection, and duly grateful, as I
+trust, to Almighty God for having directed my countrymen to a right
+conclusion, as I think, for their own good, it adds nothing to my
+satisfaction that any other man may be disappointed or pained by the
+result."</p>
+
+<p>And, as the renewed cheering evoked by this kindly, Christian utterance
+died away again, he impressively added: "May I ask those who have not
+differed with me, to join with me in this same spirit, towards those who
+have?"</p>
+
+<p>So, too, on the 17th of November, in his response to the complimentary
+address of a delegation of Union men from Maryland.</p>
+<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>
+<p> [W. H. Purnell, Esq., in behalf of the Committee, delivered an
+ address, in which he said they rejoiced that the People, by such an
+ overwhelming and unprecedented majority, had again reelected Mr.
+ Lincoln to the Presidency and endorsed his course&mdash;elevating him to
+ the proudest and most honorable position on Earth. They felt under
+ deep obligation to him because he had appreciated their condition
+ as a Slave-State. It was not too much to say that by the exercise
+ of rare discretion on his part, Maryland to-day occupies her
+ position in favor of Freedom. Slavery has been abolished therefrom
+ by the Sovereign Decree of the People. With deep and lasting
+ gratitude they desired that his Administration, as it had been
+ approved in the past, might also be successful in the future, and
+ result in the Restoration of the Union, with Freedom as its
+ immutable basis. They trusted that, on retiring from his high and
+ honorable position, the universal verdict might be that he deserved
+ well of mankind, and that favoring Heaven might 'Crown his days
+ with loving kindness and tender mercies.']</p>
+</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
+<p>The same kindly anxiety to soften and dispel the feeling of bitterness
+that had been engendered in the malignant bosoms of the
+Copperhead-Democracy by their defeat, was apparent when he said with emphasis and
+feeling:</p>
+
+<p>"I have said before, and now repeat, that I indulge in no feeling of
+triumph over any man who has thought or acted differently from myself.
+I have no such feeling toward any living man;" and again, after
+complimenting Maryland for doing "more than double her share" in the
+elections, in that she had not only carried the Republican ticket, but
+also the Free Constitution, he added: "Those who have differed with us
+and opposed us will yet see that the result of the Presidential election
+is better for their own good than if they had been successful."</p>
+
+<p>The victory of the Union-Republican Party at this election was an
+amazing one, and in the words of General Grant's dispatch of
+congratulation to the President, the fact of its "having passed off
+quietly" was, in itself, "a victory worth more to the Country than a
+battle won,"&mdash;for the Copperheads had left no stone unturned in their
+efforts to create the utmost possible rancor, in the minds of their
+partisans, against the Administration and its Party.</p>
+
+<p>Of twenty-five States voting, Lincoln and Johnson had carried the
+electoral votes of twenty-two of them, viz.: Maine, New Hampshire,
+Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Vermont, New York,
+Pennsylvania, Maryland, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Michigan,
+Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, California, Oregon, Kansas, West Virginia,
+and Nevada; while McClellan and Pendleton had carried the twenty-one
+electoral votes of the remaining three, viz.: New Jersey, Delaware, and
+Kentucky&mdash;the popular vote reaching the enormous number of 2,216,067 for
+Lincoln, to 1,808,725 for McClellan&mdash;making Lincoln's popular majority
+407,342, and his electoral majority 191!</p>
+
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+<a name="poll"></a>
+<center>
+<img alt="p598-poll.jpg (170K)" src="images/p598-poll.jpg" height="959" width="637">
+</center>
+<br><br><br><br><br>
+
+<p>But if the figures upon the Presidential candidacy were so gratifying
+and surprising to all who held the cause of Union above all others, no
+less gratifying and surprising were those of the Congressional
+elections, which indicated an entire revulsion of popular feeling on the
+subject of the Administration's policy. For, while in the current
+Congress (the 38th), there were only 106 Republican-Union to 77
+Democratic Representatives, in that for which the elections had just
+been held, (the 39th), there would be 143 Republican-Union to 41
+Democratic Representatives.</p>
+
+<p>It was at once seen, therefore, that, should the existing House of
+Representatives fail to adopt the Thirteenth Amendment to the
+Constitution, there would be much more than the requisite two-thirds
+majority for such a Measure in both Houses of the succeeding Congress;
+and moreover that in the event of its failure at the coming Session, it
+was more than probable that President Lincoln would consider himself
+justified in calling an Extra Session of the Thirty-ninth Congress for
+the especial purpose of taking such action. So far then, as the
+prospects of the Thirteenth Amendment were concerned, they looked
+decidedly more encouraging.</p>
+
+
+
+
+
+<br>
+<br>
+
+
+<center>
+<table summary="" cellPadding=4 border=3>
+<tr><td>
+
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="p5.htm">Previous Part</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</td><td>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7140-h.htm">Main Index</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+</td><td>
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="p7.htm">Next Part</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+
+</td></tr>
+</table>
+</center>
+
+
+
+</body>
+</html>
+